Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
þ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended MAY 1, 2010
or
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 1-4365
OXFORD INDUSTRIES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
Georgia |
|
58-0831862 |
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
222 Piedmont Avenue, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30308 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(404) 659-2424 |
|
|
|
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) |
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨ No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
Large accelerated filer £ |
|
Accelerated filer þ |
|
Non-accelerated filer £ |
|
Smaller reporting company £ |
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
||||
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
|
|
|
Number of shares outstanding |
|
Title of each class |
|
as of June 4, 2010 |
|
Common Stock, $1 par value |
|
16,525,517 |
OXFORD INDUSTRIES, INC.
For the first quarter of fiscal 2010
CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Our SEC filings and public announcements may include forward-looking statements about future events. Generally, the words “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “project,” “will” and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements, which generally are not historical in nature. We intend for all forward-looking statements contained herein, in our press releases or on our website, and all subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf, to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and the provisions of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (which Sections were adopted as part of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995). Important assumptions relating to these forward-looking statements include, among others, assumptions regarding the impact of economic conditions on consumer demand and spending, the impact of natural or man-made disasters in any of the regions in which our retail stores or wholesale customers are concentrated, demand for our products, timing of shipments requested by our wholesale customers, expected pricing levels, competitive conditions, the timing and cost of planned capital expenditures, costs of products and raw materials we purchase, access to capital and/or credit markets, expected outcomes of pending or potential litigation and regulatory actions and disciplined execution by key management. Forward-looking statements reflect our current expectations, based on currently available information, and are not guarantees of performance. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, these expectations could prove inaccurate as such statements involve risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our ability to control or predict. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties, or other risks or uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial, materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those anticipated, estimated or projected. Important factors relating to these risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, those described Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2009, as updated by Part II, Item 1A. Risk Factors in this report and those described from time to time in our future reports filed with the SEC.
We caution that one should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date on which they are made. We disclaim any intention, obligation or duty to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law.
DEFINITIONS
Unless the context requires otherwise, the following terms, or words of similar import, have the following meanings:
Our, us or we: Oxford Industries, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries
SG&A: Selling, general and administrative expenses
SEC: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Securities Exchange Act: the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
FASB: Financial Accounting Standards Board
U.S. GAAP: Generally accepted accounting principles in the United States
ASC: FASB Accounting Standards Codification
|
Fiscal 2011 |
52 weeks ending January 28, 2012 |
|
Fiscal 2010 |
52 weeks ending January 29, 2011 |
|
Fiscal 2009 |
52 weeks ended January 30, 2010 |
|
Fourth quarter fiscal 2010 |
13 weeks ending January 29, 2011 |
|
Third quarter fiscal 2010 |
13 weeks ending October 30, 2010 |
|
Second quarter fiscal 2010 |
13 weeks ending July 31, 2010 |
|
First quarter fiscal 2010 |
13 weeks ended May 1, 2010 |
|
Fourth quarter fiscal 2009 |
13 weeks ended January 30, 2010 |
|
Third quarter fiscal 2009 |
13 weeks ended October 31, 2009 |
|
Second quarter fiscal 2009 |
13 weeks ended August 1, 2009 |
|
First quarter fiscal 2009 |
13 weeks ended May 2, 2009 |
OXFORD INDUSTRIES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(UNAUDITED)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
First
Quarter |
|
First
Quarter |
|
Net sales |
|
$217,750 |
|
$216,731 |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
116,168 |
|
126,797 |
|
Gross profit |
|
101,582 |
|
89,934 |
|
SG&A |
|
83,752 |
|
78,683 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
250 |
|
308 |
|
|
|
84,002 |
|
78,991 |
|
Royalties and other operating income |
|
3,841 |
|
2,469 |
|
Operating income |
|
21,421 |
|
13,412 |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
5,009 |
|
4,565 |
|
Earnings before income taxes |
|
16,412 |
|
8,847 |
|
Income taxes |
|
3,915 |
|
2,236 |
|
Net earnings |
|
$ 12,497 |
|
$ 6,611 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ 0.76 |
|
$ 0.42 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ 0.76 |
|
$ 0.42 |
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
16,490 |
|
15,876 |
|
Dilution |
|
13 |
|
— |
|
Diluted |
|
16,503 |
|
15,876 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared per common share |
|
$ 0.11 |
|
$ 0.09 |
See accompanying notes.
OXFORD INDUSTRIES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(UNAUDITED)
(in thousands, except par amounts)
|
|
|
May 1, |
|
January 30, |
|
May 2, |
|
|||
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ 18,823 |
|
|
$ 8,288 |
|
|
$ 8,386 |
|
|
|
Receivables, net |
|
94,481 |
|
|
74,398 |
|
|
93,795 |
|
|
|
Inventories, net |
|
56,319 |
|
|
77,029 |
|
|
93,875 |
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses, net |
|
12,286 |
|
|
10,713 |
|
|
11,629 |
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
15,397 |
|
|
13,875 |
|
|
9,863 |
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
197,306 |
|
|
184,303 |
|
|
217,548 |
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
76,474 |
|
|
79,540 |
|
|
88,311 |
|
|
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
136,033 |
|
|
137,490 |
|
|
136,454 |
|
|
|
Other non-current assets, net |
|
23,821 |
|
|
23,841 |
|
|
19,970 |
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$433,634 |
|
|
$425,174 |
|
|
$462,283 |
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts payable and other accrued expenses |
|
$ 69,254 |
|
|
$ 81,831 |
|
|
$ 70,685 |
|
|
|
Accrued compensation |
|
17,810 |
|
|
11,514 |
|
|
9,907 |
|
|
|
Income taxes payable |
|
6,023 |
|
|
2,517 |
|
|
2,414 |
|
|
|
Short-term debt and current maturities of long-term debt |
|
2,856 |
|
|
— |
|
|
25,479 |
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
95,943 |
|
|
95,862 |
|
|
108,485 |
|
|
|
Long-term debt, less current maturities |
|
146,572 |
|
|
146,408 |
|
|
181,501 |
|
|
|
Other non-current liabilities |
|
48,401 |
|
|
50,066 |
|
|
46,304 |
|
|
|
Non-current deferred income taxes |
|
28,192 |
|
|
28,421 |
|
|
31,423 |
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders’ Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $1.00 par value per common share |
|
16,526 |
|
|
16,461 |
|
|
16,057 |
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
93,131 |
|
|
91,840 |
|
|
89,040 |
|
|
|
Retained earnings |
|
30,036 |
|
|
19,356 |
|
|
15,805 |
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
(25,167 |
) |
|
(23,240 |
) |
|
(26,332 |
) |
|
|
Total shareholders’ equity |
|
114,526 |
|
|
104,417 |
|
|
94,570 |
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity |
|
$433,634 |
|
|
$425,174 |
|
|
$462,283 |
|
|
See accompanying notes.
OXFORD INDUSTRIES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
(in thousands)
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
First Quarter |
||
|
Cash Flows From Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ 12,497 |
|
|
$ 6,611 |
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
4,366 |
|
|
4,623 |
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
250 |
|
|
308 |
|
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs and bond discount |
|
488 |
|
|
335 |
|
|
Stock compensation expense |
|
1,657 |
|
|
671 |
|
|
Loss on sale of property, plant and equipment |
|
12 |
|
|
28 |
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
(1,433 |
) |
|
(594 |
) |
|
Changes in working capital: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables |
|
(20,690 |
) |
|
(14,759 |
) |
|
Inventories |
|
20,144 |
|
|
26,196 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
(1,719 |
) |
|
(678 |
) |
|
Current liabilities |
|
(2,524 |
) |
|
(19,192 |
) |
|
Other non-current assets |
|
(301 |
) |
|
(90 |
) |
|
Other non-current liabilities |
|
(1,630 |
) |
|
(929 |
) |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
11,117 |
|
|
2,530 |
|
|
Cash Flows From Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
|
(1,561 |
) |
|
(3,771 |
) |
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
(1,561 |
) |
|
(3,771 |
) |
|
Cash Flows From Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of revolving credit arrangements |
|
(22,350 |
) |
|
(63,373 |
) |
|
Proceeds from revolving credit arrangements |
|
25,233 |
|
|
70,875 |
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
115 |
|
|
137 |
|
|
Dividends on common stock |
|
(1,821 |
) |
|
(1,430 |
) |
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
1,177 |
|
|
6,209 |
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
10,733 |
|
|
4,968 |
|
|
Effect of foreign currency translation on cash and cash equivalents |
|
(198 |
) |
|
128 |
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of year |
|
8,288 |
|
|
3,290 |
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of period |
|
$ 18,823 |
|
|
$ 8,386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest, net |
|
$ 286 |
|
|
$ 514 |
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes |
|
$ 3,404 |
|
|
$ 580 |
|
See accompanying notes.
OXFORD INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FIRST QUARTER OF FISCAL 2010
1. Basis of Presentation: The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP for interim financial reporting and the instructions of Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP. We believe the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all normal, recurring adjustments that are necessary for a fair presentation of our financial position and results of operations as of the date and for the periods presented. Results of operations for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for our full fiscal year. The accounting policies applied during the interim periods presented are consistent with the significant accounting policies described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2009.
2. Inventories: The components of inventories as of the dates specified are summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
May 1, |
|
January 30, |
|
May 2, |
|
|||
|
Finished goods |
|
$ 92,288 |
|
|
$108,788 |
|
|
$129,597 |
|
|
|
Work in process |
|
5,001 |
|
|
6,972 |
|
|
4,283 |
|
|
|
Fabric, trim and supplies |
|
3,468 |
|
|
5,707 |
|
|
6,719 |
|
|
|
LIFO reserve |
|
(44,438 |
) |
|
(44,438 |
) |
|
(46,724 |
) |
|
|
Total |
|
$ 56,319 |
|
|
$ 77,029 |
|
|
$ 93,875 |
|
|
3. Comprehensive Income: Comprehensive income, which reflects the effects of foreign currency translation adjustments, is calculated as follows for the periods presented (in thousands):
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
First Quarter |
||
|
Net earnings |
|
$12,497 |
|
|
$6,611 |
|
|
Gain (loss) on foreign currency translation, net of tax |
|
(1,927 |
) |
|
1,273 |
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$10,570 |
|
|
$7,884 |
|
4. Operating Group Information: Our business is operated through our four operating groups: Tommy Bahama, Ben Sherman, Lanier Clothes and Oxford Apparel. We identify our operating groups based on the way our management organizes the components of our business for purposes of allocating resources and assessing performance. Corporate and Other is a reconciling category for reporting purposes and includes our corporate offices, substantially all financing activities, elimination of inter-group sales, LIFO inventory accounting adjustments and other costs that are not allocated to the operating groups.
The table below presents certain information about our operating groups (in thousands).
|
|
|
First
Quarter |
|
First
Quarter |
|
||
|
Net Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tommy Bahama |
|
$109,105 |
|
|
$ 98,420 |
|
|
|
Ben Sherman |
|
22,154 |
|
|
24,219 |
|
|
|
Lanier Clothes |
|
30,428 |
|
|
31,507 |
|
|
|
Oxford Apparel |
|
56,342 |
|
|
63,204 |
|
|
|
Corporate and Other |
|
(279 |
) |
|
(619 |
) |
|
|
Total |
|
$217,750 |
|
|
$216,731 |
|
|
|
|
|
First
Quarter |
|
First
Quarter |
|
||
|
Depreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tommy Bahama |
|
$ 3,274 |
|
|
$ 3,662 |
|
|
|
Ben Sherman |
|
536 |
|
|
555 |
|
|
|
Lanier Clothes |
|
119 |
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
Oxford Apparel |
|
182 |
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
Corporate and Other |
|
255 |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ 4,366 |
|
|
$ 4,623 |
|
|
|
Amortization of Intangible Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tommy Bahama |
|
$ 173 |
|
|
$ 222 |
|
|
|
Ben Sherman |
|
67 |
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
Lanier Clothes |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
Oxford Apparel |
|
10 |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
Corporate and Other |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ 250 |
|
|
$ 308 |
|
|
|
Operating Income (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tommy Bahama |
|
$17,861 |
|
|
$12,250 |
|
|
|
Ben Sherman |
|
522 |
|
|
(1,976 |
) |
|
|
Lanier Clothes |
|
4,359 |
|
|
2,737 |
|
|
|
Oxford Apparel |
|
5,971 |
|
|
5,193 |
|
|
|
Corporate and Other |
|
(7,292 |
) |
|
(4,792 |
) |
|
|
Total Operating Income |
|
$21,421 |
|
|
$13,412 |
|
|
|
Interest Expense, net |
|
5,009 |
|
|
4,565 |
|
|
|
Earnings Before Income Taxes |
|
$16,412 |
|
|
$ 8,847 |
|
|
5. Consolidating Financial Data of Subsidiary Guarantors: Our 113/8% Senior Secured Notes due 2015 are guaranteed by substantially all of our wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries (“Subsidiary Guarantors”). All guarantees are full and unconditional. For consolidated financial reporting purposes, non-guarantors consist of our subsidiaries which are organized outside the United States and certain domestic subsidiaries. We use the equity method with respect to investment in subsidiaries included in other non-current assets in our condensed consolidating financial statements. Set forth below are our condensed consolidating balance sheets as of May 1, 2010, January 30, 2010 and May 2, 2009 (in thousands) as well as our condensed consolidating statements of operations and statements of cash flows for the first quarter of fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009 (in thousands).
OXFORD INDUSTRIES, INC.
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEETS
May 1, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oxford |
|
Subsidiary |
|
Subsidiary |
|
Consolidating |
|
Consolidated |
|
||||||||||
|
ASSETS |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ 13,581 |
|
|
$ 562 |
|
|
$ 4,680 |
|
|
$ — |
|
|
$ 18,823 |
|
|
|||||
|
Receivables, net |
|
44,199 |
|
|
|
16,525 |
|
|
|
41,447 |
|
|
|
(7,690 |
) |
|
|
94,481 |
|
|
|
|
Inventories, net |
|
(2,025 |
) |
|
|
52,467 |
|
|
|
6,543 |
|
|
|
(666 |
) |
|
|
56,319 |
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and deferred tax assets |
|
19,016 |
|
|
|
7,886 |
|
|
|
4,663 |
|
|
|
(3,882 |
) |
|
|
27,683 |
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
74,771 |
|
|
|
77,440 |
|
|
|
57,333 |
|
|
|
(12,238 |
) |
|
|
197,306 |
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
13,543 |
|
|
|
57,660 |
|
|
|
5,271 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
76,474 |
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
18 |
|
|
|
112,999 |
|
|
|
23,016 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
136,033 |
|
|
|
|
Other non-current assets, net |
|
510,663 |
|
|
|
148,913 |
|
|
|
4,208 |
|
|
|
(639,963 |
) |
|
|
23,821 |
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$598,995 |
|
|
$ 397,012 |
|
|
$ 89,828 |
|
|
$(652,201 |
) |
|
$433,634 |
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Current liabilities |
|
$ 31,017 |
|
|
$ 38,651 |
|
|
$ 33,948 |
|
|
$ (7,673 |
) |
|
$ 95,943 |
|
|
|||||
|
Long-term debt, less current portion |
|
146,572 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
146,572 |
|
|
|
|
Non-current liabilities |
|
311,526 |
|
|
|
(298,549 |
) |
|
|
143,954 |
|
|
|
(108,530 |
) |
|
|
48,401 |
|
|
|
|
Non-current deferred income taxes |
|
(4,646 |
) |
|
|
26,258 |
|
|
|
6,580 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
28,192 |
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders’/invested equity |
|
114,526 |
|
|
|
630,652 |
|
|
|
(94,654 |
) |
|
|
(535,998 |
) |
|
|
114,526 |
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity |
|
$598,995 |
|
|
$ 397,012 |
|
|
$ 89,828 |
|
|
$(652,201 |
) |
|
$433,634 |
|
|
|||||
OXFORD INDUSTRIES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEETS
January 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
Oxford |
|
Subsidiary |
|
Subsidiary |
|
Consolidating |
|
Consolidated |
|
|||||
|
ASSETS |
||||||||||||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ 5,954 |
|
$ |
782 |
|
$ |
1,552 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
8,288 |
|
|
|
Receivables, net |
|
35,943 |
|
2,412 |
|
45,958 |
|
(9,915 |
) |
74,398 |
|
|||||
|
Inventories |
|
14,218 |
|
51,911 |
|
11,897 |
|
(997 |
) |
77,029 |
|
|||||
|
Prepaid expenses and deferred tax assets |
|
17,292 |
|
8,111 |
|
3,103 |
|
(3,918 |
) |
24,588 |
|
|||||
|
Total current assets |
|
73,407 |
|
63,216 |
|
62,510 |
|
(14,830 |
) |
184,303 |
|
|||||
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
13,997 |
|
59,939 |
|
5,604 |
|
— |
|
79,540 |
|
|||||
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
28 |
|
113,173 |
|
24,289 |
|
— |
|
137,490 |
|
|||||
|
Other non-current assets, net |
|
499,389 |
|
148,932 |
|
4,216 |
|
(628,696 |
) |
23,841 |
|
|||||
|
Total Assets |
|
$586,821 |
|
$ |
385,260 |
|
$ |
96,619 |
|
$ |
(643,526 |
) |
$ |
425,174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY |
||||||||||||||||
|
Current liabilities |
|
39,507 |
|
27,319 |
|
38,686 |
|
(9,650 |
) |
95,862 |
|
|||||
|
Long-term debt, less current portion |
|
146,408 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
146,408 |
|
|||||
|
Non-current liabilities |
|
300,896 |
|
(288,230 |
) |
145,195 |
|
(107,795 |
) |
50,066 |
|
|||||
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
(4,407 |
) |
27,000 |
|
6,794 |
|
(966 |
) |
28,421 |
|
|||||
|
Total shareholders’/invested equity |
|
104,417 |
|
619,171 |
|
(94,056 |
) |
(525,115 |
) |
104,417 |
|
|||||
|
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity |
|
$586,821 |
|
$ |
385,260 |
|
$ |
96,619 |
|
$ |
(643,526 |
) |
$ |
425,174 |
|
|
OXFORD INDUSTRIES, INC.
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEETS
May 2, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
Oxford |
|
Subsidiary |
|
Subsidiary |
|
Consolidating |
|
Consolidated |
|
|||||||||
|
ASSETS |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
$ |
2,034 |
|
$ |
2,070 |
|
$ 4,282 |
|
$ — |
|
$ 8,386 |
|
|||||||
|
Receivables, net |
|
|
45,608 |
|
22,950 |
|
33,594 |
|
(8,357) |
|
93,795 |
|
|||||||||
|
Inventories |
|
|
17,971 |
|
67,411 |
|
10,471 |
|
(1,978) |
|
93,875 |
|
|||||||||
|
Prepaid expenses and deferred tax assets |
|
|
8,832 |
|
8,121 |
|
4,691 |
|
(152) |
|
21,492 |
|
|||||||||
|
Total current assets |
|
|
74,445 |
|
100,552 |
|
53,038 |
|
(10,487) |
|
217,548 |
|
|||||||||
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
9,486 |
|
72,953 |
|
5,872 |
|
— |
|
88,311 |
|
|||||||||
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
57 |
|
113,838 |
|
22,559 |
|
— |
|
136,454 |
|
|||||||||
|
Other non-current assets, net |
|
|
461,904 |
|
145,896 |
|
35,271 |
|
(623,101) |
|
19,970 |
|
|||||||||
|
Total Assets |
|
|
$ |
545,892 |
|
$ |
433,239 |
|
$116,740 |
|
$(633,588) |
|
$462,283 |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
$ |
49,416 |
|
$ |
32,550 |
|
$ 34,877 |
|
$ (8,358) |
|
$108,485 |
|
|||||||
|
Long-term debt, less current portion |
|
|
181,501 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
181,501 |
|
|||||||||
|
Non-current liabilities |
|
|
223,892 |
|
(176,134) |
|
107,701 |
|
(109,155) |
|
46,304 |
|
|||||||||
|
Non-current deferred income taxes |
|
|
(3,487) |
|
28,563 |
|
6,347 |
|
— |
|
31,423 |
|
|||||||||
|
Total shareholders’/invested equity |
|
|
94,570 |
|
548,260 |
|
(32,185) |
|
(516,075) |
|
94,570 |
|
|||||||||
|
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity |
|
|
$ |
545,892 |
|
$ |
433,239 |
|
$116,740 |
|
$(633,588) |
|
$462,283 |
|
|||||||
OXFORD INDUSTRIES, INC.
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
First Quarter Fiscal 2010
|
|
|
Oxford |
|
Subsidiary |
|
Subsidiary |
|
Consolidating |
|
Consolidated |
|
|||||
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
92,676 |
|
$ |
110,957 |
|
$ |
22,332 |
|
$ |
(8,215 |
) |
$ |
217,750 |
|
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
68,620 |
|
42,738 |
|
8,483 |
|
(3,673 |
) |
116,168 |
|
|||||
|
Gross profit |
|
24,056 |
|
68,219 |
|
13,849 |
|
(4,542 |
) |
101,582 |
|
|||||
|
SG&A including amortization of intangible assets |
|
22,691 |
|
54,642 |
|
12,897 |
|
(6,228 |
) |
84,002 |
|
|||||
|
Royalties and other operating income |
|
37 |
|
2,930 |
|
1,568 |
|
(694 |
) |
3,841 |
|
|||||
|
Operating income |
|
1,402 |
|
16,507 |
|
2,520 |
|
992 |
|
21,421 |
|
|||||
|
Interest (income) expense, net |
|
4,965 |
|
(1,041 |
) |
682 |
|
403 |
|
5,009 |
|
|||||
|
Income from equity investment |
|
12,810 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
(12,810 |
) |
— |
|
|||||
|
Earnings before income taxes |
|
9,247 |
|
17,548 |
|
1,838 |
|
(12,221 |
) |
16,412 |
|
|||||
|
Income taxes (benefit) |
|
(2,866 |
) |
6,066 |
|
509 |
|
206 |
|
3,915 |
|
|||||
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
12,113 |
|
$ |
11,482 |
|
$ |
1,329 |
|
$ |
(12,427 |
) |
$ |
12,497 |
|
OXFORD INDUSTRIES, INC.
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
First Quarter Fiscal 2009
|
|
|
Oxford |
|
Subsidiary |
|
Subsidiary |
|
Consolidating |
|
Consolidated |
|
|||||
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
92,793 |
|
$ |
108,065 |
|
$ |
25,285 |
|
$ |
(9,412 |
) |
$ |
216,731 |
|
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
74,506 |
|
45,964 |
|
10,788 |
|
(4,461 |
) |
126,797 |
|
|||||
|
Gross profit |
|
18,287 |
|
62,101 |
|
14,497 |
|
(4,951 |
) |
89,934 |
|
|||||
|
SG&A including amortization of intangible assets |
|
13,987 |
|
57,034 |
|
13,979 |
|
(6,009 |
) |
78,991 |
|
|||||
|
Royalties and other operating income |
|
13 |
|
2,219 |
|
980 |
|
(743 |
) |
2,469 |
|
|||||
|
Operating income |
|
4,313 |
|
7,286 |
|
1,498 |
|
315 |
|
13,412 |
|
|||||
|
Interest (income) expense, net |
|
4,956 |
|
(1,347 |
) |
956 |
|
— |
|
4,565 |
|
|||||
|
Income from equity investment |
|
6,956 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
(6,956 |
) |
— |
|
|||||
|
Earnings before income taxes |
|
6,313 |
|
8,633 |
|
542 |
|
(6,641 |
) |
8,847 |
|
|||||
|
Income taxes (benefit) |
|
(95 |
) |
2,263 |
|
(42 |
) |
110 |
|
2,236 |
|
|||||
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
6,408 |
|
$ |
6,370 |
|
$ |
584 |
|
$ |
(6,751 |
) |
$ |
6,611 |
|
OXFORD INDUSTRIES, INC.
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
First Quarter Fiscal 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
Oxford |
|
Subsidiary |
|
Subsidiary |
|
Consolidating |
|
Consolidated |
|
||||||||||
|
Cash Flows From Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
(1,963 |
) |
|
$ |
11,166 |
|
|
$ 1,914 |
|
|
$— |
|
$11,117 |
|
|
||||
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(287 |
) |
|
|
(983 |
) |
|
(291 |
) |
|
— |
|
(1,561 |
) |
|
||||
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Change in debt |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
2,883 |
|
|
— |
|
2,883 |
|
|
||||
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
115 |
|
|
||||
|
Change in intercompany payable |
|
|
11,583 |
|
|
|
(10,403 |
) |
|
(1,180 |
) |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
||||
|
Dividends on common stock |
|
|
(1,821 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
(1,821 |
) |
|
||||
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
|
9,877 |
|
|
|
(10,403 |
) |
|
1,703 |
|
|
— |
|
1,177 |
|
|
||||
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
7,627 |
|
|
|
(220 |
) |
|
3,326 |
|
|
— |
|
10,733 |
|
|
||||
|
Effect of foreign currency translation |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
(198 |
) |
|
— |
|
(198 |
) |
|
||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of period |
|
|
5,954 |
|
|
|
782 |
|
|
1,552 |
|
|
— |
|
8,288 |
|
|
||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of period |
|
$ |
13,581 |
|
|
$ |
562 |
|
|
$ 4,680 |
|
|
$— |
|
$18,823 |
|
|
||||
OXFORD INDUSTRIES, INC.
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
First Quarter Fiscal 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oxford |
|
Subsidiary |
|
Subsidiary |
|
Consolidating |
|
Consolidated |
|
||||||||
|
Cash Flows From Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
(11,894 |
) |
|
$ |
12,187 |
|
|
$ |
2,241 |
|
|
$ (4) |
|
$ |
2,530 |
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(835 |
) |
|
|
(2,007 |
) |
|
|
(929 |
) |
|
— |
|
|
(3,771 |
) |
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in debt |
|
|
7,793 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(291 |
) |
|
— |
|
|
7,502 |
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
Change in intercompany payable |
|
|
6,736 |
|
|
|
(8,214 |
) |
|
|
1,474 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
Dividends on common stock |
|
|
(1,430 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
(1,430 |
) |
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
|
13,236 |
|
|
|
(8,214 |
) |
|
|
1,183 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
6,209 |
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
507 |
|
|
|
1,966 |
|
|
|
2,495 |
|
|
— |
|
|
4,968 |
|
|
|
Effect of foreign currency translation |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
— |
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of period |
|
|
1,527 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
1,659 |
|
|
— |
|
|
3,290 |
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of period |
|
$ |
2,034 |
|
|
$ |
2,070 |
|
|
$ |
4,282 |
|
|
$— |
|
$ |
8,386 |
|
|
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and the notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contained in this report and the consolidated financial statements, notes to consolidated financial statements and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2009.
OVERVIEW
We generate revenues and cash flow primarily through the design, production, sale and distribution of branded and private label consumer apparel for men and women and the licensing of company-owned trademarks. Our principal markets and customers are located in the United States and, to a lesser extent, the United Kingdom. We source substantially all of our products through third-party manufacturers located outside of the United States and United Kingdom. We distribute the majority of our products through our wholesale customers, which include chain stores, department stores, specialty stores, specialty catalog retailers, mass merchants and Internet retailers. Our products for certain owned brands are also sold through our owned and licensed retail stores and e-commerce websites.
As a result of the weak global economic conditions, fiscal 2009 was a particularly challenging year for each of our operating groups. While we have seen some signs of recovery, we believe these challenging economic conditions will continue to persist and impact each of our operating groups in fiscal 2010. Thus, we have purchased inventory for fiscal 2010 at levels which we believe will mitigate inventory markdown risk and promotional pressure, but also may limit our growth opportunities. In the current economic environment, we also believe it is important to continue to focus on maintaining a strong balance sheet and ample liquidity. We believe that the measures we have taken to reduce working capital requirements, moderate capital expenditures for retail stores, reduce our overhead and refinance our significant debt agreements have significantly enhanced our balance sheet and liquidity.
The apparel and retail industry is cyclical and dependent upon the overall level of discretionary consumer spending, which changes as regional, domestic and international economic conditions change. The impact of negative economic conditions may have a longer and more severe impact on the apparel and retail industry than the same conditions would have on other industries. Therefore, even if conditions improve in the general economy, the negative impact on the apparel and retail industry may continue.
The following table sets forth our consolidated operating results (in thousands, except per share amounts) for the first quarter of fiscal 2010 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2009:
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
Fiscal 2010 |
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
||
|
Net sales |
|
$217,750 |
|
|
$216,731 |
|
|
$1,019 |
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ 12,497 |
|
|
$ 6,611 |
|
|
$5,886 |
|
|
Diluted net earnings per common share |
|
$ 0.76 |
|
|
$ 0.42 |
|
|
$ 0.34 |
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding—diluted |
|
16,503 |
|
|
15,876 |
|
|
|
|
The primary reasons for the improvement in net earnings were:
· Improved gross margins in each operating group in the first quarter of fiscal 2010 primarily due to product mix within each group and the lack of sales related to certain exited businesses in the first quarter of fiscal 2010.
· A change in our consolidated net sales mix, with Tommy Bahama sales, which generally have higher gross margins than our other operating groups, representing a higher proportion of consolidated net sales during the first quarter of fiscal 2010.
· Increased royalty income in both Tommy Bahama and Ben Sherman resulting from increased sales during the first quarter of fiscal 2010 by existing licensees, as well as the addition of new licensees.
These items were partially offset by increased SG&A primarily due to increased incentive compensation amounts resulting from the resumption of our incentive compensation program which was suspended in fiscal 2009 and is tied to our financial performance.
OPERATING GROUPS
Our business is operated through our four operating groups: Tommy Bahama, Ben Sherman, Lanier Clothes and Oxford Apparel. We identify our operating groups based on the way our management organizes the components of our business for purposes of allocating resources and assessing performance.
Tommy Bahama designs, sources and markets collections of men’s and women’s sportswear and related products. The target consumers of Tommy Bahama are affluent men and women age 35 and older who embrace a relaxed and casual approach to daily living. Tommy Bahama® products can be found in our owned and licensed Tommy Bahama retail stores and on our e-commerce website as well as in certain department stores and independent specialty stores throughout the United States. We also license the Tommy Bahama name for various product categories and operate Tommy Bahama restaurants.
Ben Sherman is a London-based designer, marketer and distributor of branded sportswear and related products. Ben Sherman® was established in 1963 as an edgy, young men’s, “Mod”-inspired shirt brand and has evolved into a British lifestyle brand of apparel targeted at youthful-thinking men age 19 to 35 throughout the world. We offer a Ben Sherman men’s sportswear collection as well as tailored clothing and accessories. Our Ben Sherman products can be found in certain department stores and a variety of independent specialty stores and in our owned and licensed Ben Sherman retail stores as well as on our e-commerce websites. We also license the Ben Sherman name for various product categories.
Lanier Clothes designs and markets branded and private label men’s suits, sportcoats, suit separates and dress slacks across a wide range of price points. Certain Lanier Clothes products are sold using trademarks licensed to us by third parties, including Kenneth Cole®, Dockers®, and Geoffrey Beene®. We also offer branded tailored clothing products under our Billy London® and Arnold Brant® trademarks. In addition to our branded businesses, we design and source certain private label tailored clothing products. Significant private label brands include Stafford®, Lands’ End® and Alfani®. Our Lanier Clothes products are sold to national chains, department stores, mass merchants, specialty stores, specialty catalog retailers and discount retailers throughout the United States.
Oxford Apparel produces branded and private label dress shirts, suit separates, sport shirts, casual slacks, outerwear, sweaters, jeans, swimwear, westernwear and golf apparel. We design and source certain private label programs for several customers, including programs for Costco, Lands’ End, Target, Macy’s and Sears. Significant owned brands of Oxford Apparel include Oxford Golf®, Ely®, Cattleman® and Cumberland Outfitters®. Oxford Apparel also owns a two-thirds interest in the entity that owns the Hathaway® trademark in the United States and several other countries. Additionally, Oxford Apparel licenses from third parties the right to use certain trademarks including Dockers and United States Polo Association® for certain apparel products. Our Oxford Apparel products are sold to a variety of department stores, mass merchants, specialty catalog retailers, discount retailers, specialty stores, “green grass” golf merchants and Internet retailers throughout the United States.
Corporate and Other is a reconciling category for reporting purposes and includes our corporate office, substantially all financing activities, elimination of inter-segment sales, LIFO inventory accounting adjustments and other costs that are not allocated to the operating groups. LIFO inventory calculations are made on a legal entity basis which does not correspond to our operating group definitions; therefore, LIFO inventory accounting adjustments are not allocated to operating groups.
For further information regarding our operating groups, see Note 4 to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included in this report and Part I, Item 1, Business in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2009.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
FIRST QUARTER OF FISCAL 2010 COMPARED TO FIRST QUARTER OF FISCAL 2009
The following table sets forth the specified line items in our unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations both in dollars (in thousands) and as a percentage of net sales. The table also sets forth the dollar change and the percentage change of the data as compared to the same period of the prior year. We have calculated all percentages based on actual data, but percentage columns may not add due to rounding. Individual line items of our
consolidated statements of operations may not be directly comparable to those of our competitors, as classification of certain expenses may vary by company.
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
Fiscal 2010 |
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
||||
|
Net sales |
|
$217,750 |
|
100.0% |
|
$216,731 |
|
100.0% |
|
$ 1,019 |
|
0.5% |
|
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
116,168 |
|
53.3% |
|
126,797 |
|
58.5% |
|
(10,629 |
) |
(8.4% |
) |
|
Gross profit |
|
101,582 |
|
46.7% |
|
89,934 |
|
41.5% |
|
11,648 |
|
13.0% |
|
|
SG&A |
|
83,752 |
|
38.5% |
|
78,683 |
|
36.3% |
|
5,069 |
|
6.4% |
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
250 |
|
0.1% |
|
308 |
|
0.1% |
|
(58 |
) |
(18.8% |
) |
|
Royalties and other operating income |
|
3,841 |
|
1.8% |
|
2,469 |
|
1.1% |
|
1,372 |
|
55.6% |
|
|
Operating income |
|
21,421 |
|
9.8% |
|
13,412 |
|
6.2% |
|
8,009 |
|
59.7% |
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
5,009 |
|
2.3% |
|
4,565 |
|
2.1% |
|
444 |
|
9.7% |
|
|
Earnings before income taxes |
|
16,412 |
|
7.5% |
|
8,847 |
|
4.1% |
|
7,565 |
|
85.5% |
|
|
Income taxes |
|
3,915 |
|
1.8% |
|
2,236 |
|
1.0% |
|
1,679 |
|
75.1% |
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ 12,497 |
|
5.7% |
|
$ 6,611 |
|
3.1% |
|
$ 5,886 |
|
89.0% |
|
The discussion and tables below compare certain line items included in our statements of operations for the first quarter of fiscal 2010 to the first quarter of fiscal 2009. Each dollar and percentage change provided reflects the change between these periods unless indicated otherwise. Each dollar and share amount included in the tables is in thousands except for per share amounts.
Net Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2010 |
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
|||
|
Tommy Bahama |
|
|
|
|
|
$109,105 |
|
|
$ 98,420 |
|
|
$10,685 |
|
|
10.9% |
|
|
Ben Sherman |
|
|
|
|
|
22,154 |
|
|
24,219 |
|
|
(2,065 |
) |
|
(8.5% |
) |
|
Lanier Clothes |
|
|
|
|
|
30,428 |
|
|
31,507 |
|
|
(1,079 |
) |
|
(3.4% |
) |
|
Oxford Apparel |
|
|
|
|
|
56,342 |
|
|
63,204 |
|
|
(6,862 |
) |
|
(10.9% |
) |
|
Corporate and Other |
|
|
|
|
|
(279 |
) |
|
(619 |
) |
|
340 |
|
|
54.9% |
|
|
Total net sales |
|
|
|
|
|
$217,750 |
|
|
$216,731 |
|
|
$ 1,019 |
|
|
0.5% |
|
Consolidated net sales increased $1.0 million, or 0.5%, in the first quarter of fiscal 2010 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2009 primarily as a result of the improved retail environment, resulting in certain customers requesting the shipment of product in the first quarter of fiscal 2010 which we had planned to ship in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 and the other changes in each operating group discussed below.
Tommy Bahama:
The increase in net sales for Tommy Bahama was due to increases in both the direct to consumer and wholesale channels of distribution as the retail environment improved. Apparel unit sales increased 19.5% while the average selling price per unit for apparel decreased by 5.9%. As of May 1, 2010 and May 2, 2009, we operated 84 Tommy Bahama retail stores.
Ben Sherman:
The decrease in net sales for Ben Sherman was primarily due to an 8.9% reduction in unit sales primarily resulting from our exit and subsequent licensing of our footwear and kids’ businesses and the exit from the women’s operations. The decrease was partially offset by a 5.6% increase in the average exchange rate of the British pound sterling versus the United States dollar during the first quarter of fiscal 2010 compared to the average exchange rate during the first quarter of fiscal 2009 and higher sales at our own retail stores. The average selling price per unit for Ben Sherman remained relatively flat compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2009.
Lanier Clothes:
The decrease in net sales for Lanier Clothes was primarily due to our exit from certain businesses as the first quarter of fiscal 2009 included close-out sales associated with these businesses. This decrease in net sales was partially offset by higher sales levels in our owned and licensed branded businesses primarily resulting from the improved retail environment. Unit sales declined 1.4% and the average selling price per unit decreased 2.0%.
Oxford Apparel:
The decrease in net sales for Oxford Apparel was primarily due to the first quarter of fiscal 2009 including close-out sales related to certain businesses that we previously exited, partially offset by the positive impact of the improved retail environment. Unit sales declined 11.2% and the average selling price per unit was relatively flat between the two periods.
Gross Profit
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
Fiscal 2010 |
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
|||
|
Gross profit |
|
$101,582 |
|
|
$89,934 |
|
|
$11,648 |
|
|
13.0% |
|
|
Gross margin (gross profit as a % of net sales) |
|
46.7 |
% |
|
41.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIFO charges included in cost of goods sold |
|
$ 651 |
|
|
$ 1,448 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in gross profit was primarily due to improved gross margins in each operating group resulting from changes in product mix in each operating group and the increase in Tommy Bahama’s net sales, which generally have higher gross margins than our other operating groups, both in total and as a proportion of consolidated net sales. Gross margins increased to 46.7% of net sales during the first quarter of fiscal 2010 from 41.5% in the first quarter of fiscal 2009. Gross profit included charges for LIFO accounting of $0.7 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2010 and $1.4 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2009. We anticipate that consolidated gross margins in fiscal 2010 will continue to increase compared to the prior year as our consolidated sales mix is more heavily weighted towards Tommy Bahama, however, this change will be partially offset by increases in cotton prices, wages in Asia and ocean shipping costs. Our gross profit may not be directly comparable to those of our competitors, as statement of operations classification of certain expenses may vary by company.
SG&A
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
Fiscal 2010 |
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
|||
|
SG&A |
|
$83,752 |
|
|
$78,683 |
|
|
$5,069 |
|
|
6.4% |
|
|
SG&A (as % of net sales) |
|
38.5 |
% |
|
36.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in SG&A was primarily due to costs associated with the resumption of our incentive compensation program which was suspended in fiscal 2009 and is tied to our financial performance. The increase was also due to severance related costs.
Royalties and other operating income
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
Fiscal 2010 |
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
|
Royalties and other operating income |
|
$3,841 |
|
$2,469 |
|
$1,372 |
|
55.6% |
|
The increase in royalties and other operating income were primarily due to increased royalty income in both Tommy Bahama and Ben Sherman as sales reported by certain licensees increased and new licensees were added.
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
Fiscal 2010 |
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
|||
|
Tommy Bahama |
|
$17,861 |
|
|
$12,250 |
|
|
$ 5,611 |
|
|
45.8% |
|
|
Ben Sherman |
|
522 |
|
|
(1,976 |
) |
|
2,498 |
|
|
126.4% |
|
|
Lanier Clothes |
|
4,359 |
|
|
2,737 |
|
|
1,622 |
|
|
59.3% |
|
|
Oxford Apparel |
|
5,971 |
|
|
5,193 |
|
|
778 |
|
|
15.0% |
|
|
Corporate and Other |
|
(7,292 |
) |
|
(4,792 |
) |
|
(2,500 |
) |
|
(52.2% |
) |
|
Total operating income (loss) |
|
$ 21,421 |
|
|
$13,412 |
|
|
$ 8,009 |
|
|
59.7% |
|
|
Total LIFO charges included in total operating income |
|
$ 651 |
|
|
$ 1,448 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income, on a consolidated basis, increased to $21.4 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2010 from $13.4 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2009. The $8.0 million increase in operating income was primarily due to the increased net sales, improved gross margins resulting from changes in sales mix and higher royalty income, which was partially offset by increased SG&A, each as described above. Operating income included charges for LIFO accounting
of $0.7 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2010 and $1.4 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2009. Changes in operating income by operating group are discussed below.
Tommy Bahama:
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
Fiscal 2010 |
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
|||
|
Net sales |
|
$109,105 |
|
|
$98,420 |
|
|
$10,685 |
|
|
10.9% |
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ 17,861 |
|
|
$12,250 |
|
|
$ 5,611 |
|
|
45.8% |
|
|
Operating income as % of net sales |
|
16.4 |
% |
|
12.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in operating income for Tommy Bahama was primarily due to the increased net sales, improved gross margins due to sales mix and higher royalty income, partially offset by increased SG&A.
Ben Sherman:
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
Fiscal 2010 |
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
|||
|
Net sales |
|
$22,154 |
|
|
$24,219 |
|
|
$(2,065 |
) |
|
(8.5% |
) |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ 522 |
|
|
$ (1,976 |
) |
|
$ 2,498 |
|
|
126.4% |
|
|
Operating income (loss) as % of net sales |
|
2.4 |
% |
|
(8.2 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in operating income for Ben Sherman was primarily due to increased gross margins and reduced SG&A, both of which were a result of our exit from and subsequent licensing of the footwear and kids’ business and our exit from the women’s operations, and increased royalty income.
Lanier Clothes:
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
Fiscal 2010 |
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
|||
|
Net sales |
|
$30,428 |
|
|
$31,507 |
|
|
$(1,079 |
) |
|
(3.4% |
) |
|
Operating income |
|
$ 4,359 |
|
|
$ 2,737 |
|
|
$ 1,622 |
|
|
59.3% |
|
|
Operating income as % of net sales |
|
14.3 |
% |
|
8.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in operating income for Lanier Clothes was primarily due to improved gross margins due to (1) sales mix with branded sales representing a greater proportion of Lanier Clothes’ sales, (2) improved product cost and (3) close-out sales associated with exited businesses included in the prior year. The improved gross margins were partially offset by increased SG&A resulting from higher incentive compensation.
Oxford Apparel:
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
Fiscal 2010 |
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
|||
|
Net sales |
|
$56,342 |
|
|
$63,204 |
|
|
$(6,862 |
) |
|
(10.9% |
) |
|
Operating income |
|
$ 5,971 |
|
|
$ 5,193 |
|
|
$ 778 |
|
|
15.0% |
|
|
Operating income as % of net sales |
|
10.6 |
% |
|
8.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in operating income was primarily due to decreased SG&A and improved gross margins due to the prior year including certain close-out sales associated with exited businesses.
Corporate and Other:
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
Fiscal 2010 |
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
|||
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$(7,292 |
) |
|
$(4,792 |
) |
|
$(2,500 |
) |
|
(52.2% |
) |
|
LIFO charges included in operating income (loss) |
|
$ 651 |
|
|
$ 1,448 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Corporate and Other operating loss increased $2.5 million from a loss of $4.8 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2009 to a loss of $7.3 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2010. The increase in the operating loss was primarily due to higher incentive compensation and severance costs. Operating loss included LIFO accounting charges of $0.7 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2010 and $1.4 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2009.
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
Fiscal 2010 |
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
$5,009 |
|
$4,565 |
|
$444 |
|
9.7% |
|
The increase in interest expense was primarily due to the higher interest rate associated with our 113/8% Senior Secured Notes due 2015, which we issued in the second quarter of fiscal 2009. This higher interest rate was partially offset by a lower level of borrowings resulting from our use of positive operating cash flows to reduce our debt levels.
Income taxes
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
Fiscal 2010 |
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
|
Income taxes |
|
$3,915 |
|
$2,236 |
|
$1,679 |
|
75.1% |
|
|
Effective tax rate |
|
23.9% |
|
25.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
The rates for both periods reflect the favorable impact of permanent differences which do not necessarily fluctuate with earnings as well as the impact of certain discrete items, including the decrease in certain income tax contingency reserves upon the expiration of the corresponding statute of limitations.
Net earnings
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
Fiscal 2010 |
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
Change |
|
% Change |
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$12,497 |
|
$ 6,611 |
|
$5,886 |
|
89.0% |
|
|
Diluted net earnings per common share |
|
$ 0.76 |
|
$ 0.42 |
|
$ 0.34 |
|
81.0% |
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding-diluted |
|
16,503 |
|
15,876 |
|
627 |
|
3.9% |
|
The increase in diluted net earnings per common share was primarily due to (1) the improved gross margins in each operating group, (2) the change in sales mix with a greater proportion of net sales being sales of Tommy Bahama products and (3) higher royalty income, which were partially offset by higher SG&A, primarily due to higher incentive compensation costs resulting from the improved operating results in each group.
FINANCIAL CONDITION, LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Our primary source of revenue and cash flow is our operating activities in the United States and, to a lesser extent, the United Kingdom. When cash inflows are less than cash outflows, we also have access to amounts under our U.S. Revolving Credit Agreement and U.K. Revolving Credit Agreement (each as described below), subject to their terms, each of which is described below. We may seek to finance future capital investment programs through various methods, including, but not limited to, cash flow from operations, borrowings under our current or additional credit facilities and sales of debt or equity securities.
Our liquidity requirements arise from the funding of our working capital needs, which include inventory and accounts receivable, other operating expenses, funding of capital expenditures, payment of quarterly dividends, periodic interest payments related to our financing arrangements and repayment of our indebtedness. Some of our product purchases are facilitated by trade letters of credit which are drawn against our lines of credit at the time of shipment of the products and reduce the amounts available under our lines of credit and borrowing capacity under our credit facilities when issued.
Key Liquidity Measures
|
($ in thousands) |
|
May 1, 2010 |
|
January 30, 2010 |
|
May 2, 2009 |
|
January 31, 2009 |
|
||||
|
Current assets |
|
$197,306 |
|
|
$184,303 |
|
|
$217,548 |
|
|
$222,477 |
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
95,943 |
|
|
95,862 |
|
|
108,485 |
|
|
106,833 |
|
|
|
Working capital |
|
$101,363 |
|
|
$ 88,441 |
|
|
$109,063 |
|
|
$115,644 |
|
|
|
Working capital ratio |
|
2.06 |
|
|
1.92 |
|
|
2.01 |
|
|
2.08 |
|
|
|
Debt to total capital ratio |
|
57 |
% |
|
58 |
% |
|
69 |
% |
|
70 |
% |
|
Our working capital ratio is calculated by dividing total current assets by total current liabilities, both of which declined from May 2, 2009 to May 1, 2010, as described below. For the ratio of debt to total capital, debt is defined as short-term and long-term debt, and total capital is defined as debt plus shareholders’ equity. The change in the debt to
total capital ratio from May 2, 2009 to May 1, 2010 was primarily a result of the significant reduction in debt since May 2, 2009 due to cash flows from operations, as well as increased shareholders’ equity due to our net earnings subsequent to May 2, 2009. Our debt levels and ratio of debt to total capital in future periods may not be comparable to historical amounts as we continue to assess and may periodically make changes to our capital structure. Changes in our capital structure, if any, will depend on prevailing market conditions, our liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors.
Balance Sheet
The following tables set forth certain information included in our consolidated balance sheets (in thousands). Below each table are explanations for any significant changes in the balances from May 2, 2009 to May 1, 2010.
Current Assets:
|
|
|
May 1, 2010 |
|
January 30, 2010 |
|
May 2, 2009 |
|
January 31, 2009 |
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ 18,823 |
|
$ 8,288 |
|
$ 8,386 |
|
$ 3,290 |
|
|
Receivables, net |
|
94,481 |
|
74,398 |
|
93,795 |
|
78,567 |
|
|
Inventories, net |
|
56,319 |
|
77,029 |
|
93,875 |
|
119,616 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
12,286 |
|
10,713 |
|
11,629 |
|
10,845 |
|
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
15,397 |
|
13,875 |
|
9,863 |
|
10,159 |
|
|
Total current assets |
|
$197,306 |
|
$184,303 |
|
$217,548 |
|
$222,477 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents increased at May 1, 2010 primarily due to our positive cash flows from operating activities subsequent to May 2, 2009. Inventory levels for each operating group have decreased significantly as (1) we emphasized increasing inventory turns, (2) focused on mitigating inventory markdown risk and promotional pressure, (3) exited certain lines of business and (4) certain sales that were originally expected for the second quarter of fiscal 2010 were shipped during the first quarter of fiscal 2010 at the request of wholesale customers. The increase in deferred tax assets was primarily related to the tax impact associated with inventory levels.
Non-current Assets:
|
|
|
May 1, 2010 |
|
January 30, 2010 |
|
May 2, 2009 |
|
January 31, 2009 |
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
$ 76,474 |
|
$ 79,540 |
|
$ 88,311 |
|
$ 89,026 |
|
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
136,033 |
|
137,490 |
|
136,454 |
|
135,999 |
|
|
Other non-current assets, net |
|
23,821 |
|
23,841 |
|
19,970 |
|
20,180 |
|
|
Total non-current assets, net |
|
$236,328 |
|
$240,871 |
|
$244,735 |
|
$245,205 |
|
The decrease in property, plant and equipment, net was primarily due to depreciation expense exceeding capital expenditures during the twelve months preceding May 1, 2010, as we reduced our investments in new retail stores during the challenging economic environment. The increase in other non-current assets, net was primarily due to the payment of certain deferred financing costs associated with the offering of our 113/8% Senior Secured Notes in June 2009 and the increase in deferred compensation plan asset values.
Liabilities:
|
|
|
May 1, 2010 |
|
January 30, 2010 |
|
May 2, 2009 |
|
January 31, 2009 |
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
$ 95,943 |
|
$ 95,862 |
|
$108,485 |
|
$106,833 |
|
|
Long-term debt less current maturities |
|
146,572 |
|
146,408 |
|
181,501 |
|
194,187 |
|
|
Other non-current liabilities |
|
48,401 |
|
50,066 |
|
46,304 |
|
47,244 |
|
|
Non-current deferred income taxes |
|
28,192 |
|
28,421 |
|
31,423 |
|
32,111 |
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$319,108 |
|
$320,757 |
|
$367,713 |
|
$380,375 |
|
The decrease in current liabilities was primarily due to the reduction in the current maturities of long-term debt from the prior year. This decrease was partially offset by an increase in accrued compensation and income tax payable as of May 1, 2010. The decrease in long-term debt less current maturities and current maturities of long-term debt are primarily due to cash flow from operating activities for the twelve months preceeding May 1, 2010. The cash flow from operating activities was a result of net earnings and improved working capital positions. The increase in other non-current liabilities was primarily due to the increase in deferred compensation plan liabilities. The change in non-current deferred income taxes primarily resulted from (1) changes in book/tax differences for depreciation and deferred compensation, (2) changes in tax accrued on undistributed foreign earnings and (3) the indirect federal benefit of
certain reserves for uncertain tax positions and adjustments to reflect changes in the effective tax rate at which certain deferred items are expected to be realized, which are partially offset by changes in foreign currency rates.
Statement of Cash Flows
The following table sets forth the net cash flows resulting in the change in our in cash and cash equivalents (in thousands):
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
||
|
|
|
Fiscal 2010 |
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$11,117 |
|
$ 2,530 |
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
(1,561) |
|
(3,771) |
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
1,177 |
|
6,209 |
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
$10,733 |
|
$ 4,968 |
|
Operating Activities:
The operating cash flows for the first quarter of fiscal 2010 and the first quarter of fiscal 2009 were primarily the result of net earnings for the relevant period, adjusted for non-cash activities such as depreciation, amortization and stock compensation expense as well as changes in our working capital accounts. In both fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009, the significant changes in working capital were (1) decreased inventories, (2) decreased current liabilities and (3) increased accounts receivable. These changes reflect our emphasis on reducing our working capital investment during the challenging economic conditions.
Investing Activities:
During the first quarter of fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009, investing activities used $1.6 million and $3.8 million, respectively, of cash. In each of the applicable periods, these investing activities primarily consisted of capital expenditures related to new retail stores and costs associated with investment in certain technology initiatives, including the continuing implementation of our new integrated financial systems.
Financing Activities:
During the first quarter of fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009, financing activities provided $1.2 million and $6.2 million, respectively, of cash. In each of the applicable periods, these financing activities resulted primarily from borrowings under our revolving credit facilities, partially offset by the payment of dividends in each period.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The table below provides a description of our significant financing arrangements and the amounts outstanding under these financing arrangements (in thousands) as of May 1, 2010:
|
$175 million U.S. Secured Revolving Credit Facility (“U.S. Revolving Credit Agreement”), which is limited to a borrowing base consisting of specified percentages of eligible categories of assets, accrues interest, unused line fees and letter of credit fees based upon a pricing grid which is tied to average unused availability, requires interest payments monthly with principal due at maturity (August 2013) and is secured by a first priority security interest in the accounts receivable (other than royalty payments in respect of trademark licenses), inventory, investment property (including the equity interests of certain subsidiaries), general intangibles (other than trademarks, trade names and related rights), deposit accounts, intercompany obligations, equipment, goods, documents, contracts, books and records and other personal property of Oxford Industries, Inc. and substantially all of its domestic subsidiaries and a second priority interest in those assets in which the holders of the 113/8% Senior Secured Notes have a first priority interest |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
£10 million Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility (“U.K. Revolving Credit Agreement”), which accrues interest at the bank’s base rate plus 3.5% (4.0% as of May 1, 2010), requires interest payments monthly with principal payable on demand and is collateralized by substantially all of the United Kingdom assets of Ben Sherman |
|
2,856 |
|
|
|
11.375% Senior Secured Notes (“113/8% Senior Secured Notes”), which accrue interest at an annual rate of 11.375% (effective interest rate of 12%) and require interest payments semi-annually in January and July of each year, require payment of principal at maturity (July 2015), are subject to certain prepayment penalties, are secured by a first priority interest in all U.S. registered trademarks and certain related rights and certain future acquired real property owned in fee simple of Oxford Industries, Inc. and substantially all of its consolidated domestic subsidiaries and a second priority interest in those assets in which the lenders under the U.S. Revolving Credit Agreement have a first priority interest, and are guaranteed by certain of our domestic subsidiaries |
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
Unamortized discount |
|
(3,428 |
) |
|
|
Total debt |
|
$ |
149,428 |
|
|
Short-term debt and current maturities of long-term debt |
|
(2,856 |
) |
|
|
Long-term debt, less current maturities |
|
$ |
146,572 |
|
Our credit facilities are used to finance trade letters of credit, as well to provide funding for other operating activities, capital expenditures and acquisitions. As of May 1, 2010, approximately $17.0 million of trade letters of credit and other limitations on availability in the aggregate were outstanding against the U.S. Revolving Credit Agreement and the U.K. Revolving Credit Agreement. On May 1, 2010, we had approximately $138.8 million and $10.5 million in unused availability under the U.S. Revolving Credit Agreement and the U.K. Revolving Credit Agreement, respectively, subject to the respective limitations on borrowings set forth in the U.S. Revolving Credit Agreement, U.K. Revolving Credit Agreement and the indenture for the 113/8% Senior Secured Notes.
Covenants, Other Restrictions and Prepayment Penalties:
Our credit facilities and 113/8% Senior Secured Notes are subject to a number of affirmative covenants, negative covenants, financial covenants and other restrictions as discussed in Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Note 5 in our consolidated financial statements, both included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2009. We believe the affirmative covenants, negative covenants, financial covenants and other restrictions are customary for those included in similar facilities and notes entered into at the time we entered into our agreements. As of May 1, 2010, we were compliant with all covenants related to our credit facilities and 113/8% Senior Secured Notes. If we were to redeem any of our 113/8% Senior Secured Notes prior to July 15, 2014 pursuant to the indenture governing the notes, we would be required to pay certain premiums above the principal amount, which are also discussed in Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Note 5 in our consolidated financial statements, both included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2009.
Other Liquidity Items:
We anticipate that we will be able to satisfy our ongoing cash requirements, which generally consist of working capital needs, capital expenditures and interest payments on our debt during fiscal 2010, primarily from positive cash flow from operations supplemented by borrowings under our lines of credit, if necessary. Our need for working capital is typically seasonal with the greatest requirements generally existing in the fall and spring of each year. Our capital needs will depend on many factors including our growth rate, the need to finance inventory levels and the success of our various products. At maturity of the U.S. Revolving Credit Agreement and the 113/8% Senior Secured Notes or if the U.K. Revolving Credit Agreement was required to be paid, we anticipate that we will be able to refinance the facilities and debt with terms available in the market at that time, which may or may not be as favorable as the terms of the current agreements.
Our contractual obligations as of May 1, 2010 have not changed significantly from the contractual obligations outstanding at January 30, 2010 other than changes in the amounts outstanding under our U.K. Revolving Credit Agreement and pursuant to letters of credit (each as discussed above).
Our anticipated capital expenditures for fiscal 2010, including $1.6 million incurred during the first quarter of fiscal 2010, are expected to be approximately $15 million. These expenditures are expected to consist primarily of additional retail stores and costs associated with investment in certain technology initiatives, including the continuing implementation of new integrated financial systems.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have not entered into agreements which meet the SEC’s definition of an off balance sheet financing arrangement, other than operating leases, and have made no financial commitments to or guarantees with respect to any unconsolidated subsidiaries or special purpose entities.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to bad debts, inventories, intangible assets, income taxes, stock compensation expense, contingencies and litigation and certain other accrued expenses. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. Our critical accounting policies and estimates are discussed in Part II, Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2009. There have not been any significant changes to the application of our critical accounting policies and estimates during the first quarter of fiscal 2010.
A detailed summary of significant accounting policies is included in Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2009.
SEASONALITY
Although our various product lines are sold on a year-round basis, the demand for specific products or styles may be seasonal. For example, the demand for Tommy Bahama in our principal markets is higher in the spring season. Generally, our wholesale products are sold prior to each of the retail selling seasons, including spring, summer, fall and holiday. As the timing of product shipments and other events affecting the retail business may vary, we do not believe that results for any particular quarter are necessarily indicative of results for the full fiscal year. The following table presents the percentage of net sales and operating income by quarter (unaudited) for fiscal 2009.
|
|
|
First |
|
Second |
|
Third |
|
Fourth |
|
|
Net sales |
|
27% |
|
24% |
|
25% |
|
24% |
|
|
Operating income |
|
33% |
|
15% |
|
27% |
|
25% |
|
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are exposed to certain interest rate, foreign currency, commodity and inflation risks as discussed in Part II, Item 7A, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2009. There have not been any significant changes in our exposure to these risks during the first quarter of fiscal 2010.
Our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer have evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by us in our Securities Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
There have not been any changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act) that occurred during the first quarter of fiscal 2010 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
In the ordinary course of business, we may become subject to litigation or claims. We are not currently a party to any litigation or regulatory action that we believe could reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
We believe that an investor should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2009, which are not the only risks facing our company. We do not believe there have been any material changes to the risk factors described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2009. If any of the risks described in such Annual Report, or other risks or uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial, actually occur, our business, financial condition or operating results could suffer.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
(a) During the first quarter of fiscal 2010, we did not make any unregistered sales of our equity securities.
(c) We have certain stock incentive plans as described in Note 7 to our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2009, all of which are publicly announced plans. Under the plans, we can repurchase shares from employees to cover employee tax liabilities related to the exercise of stock options or the vesting of previously restricted shares. During the first quarter of fiscal 2010, we repurchased the following shares pursuant to these plans:
|
Fiscal |
|
|
Total
Number |
|
Average |
|
Total
Number of |
|
Maximum |
|
|
February (01/31/10 - 02/27/10) |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
|
March (02/28/10 - 4/3/10) |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
|
April (4/4/10 - 5/1/10) |
|
18,903 |
|
$21.25 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
|
Total |
|
18,903 |
|
$21.25 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
On September 8, 2008, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase by us of up to 0.5 million shares of our common stock. As of May 1, 2010, no shares had been repurchased pursuant to this authorization, which has no automatic expiration.
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None
None
None
|
|
3.1 |
Restated Articles of Incorporation of Oxford Industries, Inc. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended August 29, 2003. |
|
|
3.2 |
Bylaws of Oxford Industries, Inc., as amended. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on June 17, 2009. |
|
|
31.1 |
Section 302 Certification by Principal Executive Officer.* |
|
|
31.2 |
Section 302 Certification by Principal Financial Officer.* |
|
|
32 |
Section 906 Certification by Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer.* |
* Filed herewith.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
|
June 9, 2010 |
OXFORD INDUSTRIES, INC. |
|
|
|
(Registrant) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ K. Scott Grassmyer |
|
|
|
K. Scott Grassmyer |
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Controller |
|
|
|
(Authorized Signatory) |
|