a50458263.htm


UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C.  20549
FORM 10-Q
     
(Mark One)
   
     
R
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
 
 
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
 
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2012
 

or

£
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
 
 
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 

For the transition period from ________ to ________

Commission File Number 001-34931

SeaCube Container Leasing Ltd.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Bermuda
98-0655416
(State of other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
   
1 Maynard Drive
 
Park Ridge, New Jersey
07656
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)

(201) 391-0800
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
 
Yes
x
No
o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
 
Yes
x
No
o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
 
Large accelerated filer o
Accelerated filer x
Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller
reporting company)
Smaller reporting company o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
 
Yes
o
No
x
 
The number of outstanding shares of the Registrant’s Common Stock as of November 1, 2012 was 20,288,359.



 
 

 
 
SeaCube Container Leasing Ltd.
 
FORM 10-Q
 
Table of Contents
 
 
     
Page No.
 
       
   
       
 
1
       
   
 
2
       
   
 
3
       
   
 
4
       
 
5
       
   
   
15
       
 
27
       
 
28
       
 
       
 
29
       
 
29
       
 
29
       
 
29
       
 
29
       
 
29
       
 
30
       
 
31

 
 

 
 
PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION


Item 1.  Financial Statements

SeaCube Container Leasing Ltd.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Amounts in thousands, except for share amounts)
 
 
   
September 30, 2012
   
December 31, 2011
 
   
(unaudited)
       
Assets
           
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 18,085     $ 15,006  
Restricted cash
    34,614       29,649  
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $1,506 and $3,290, respectively
    40,832       41,570  
Net investment in direct finance leases
    652,606       639,248  
Leasing equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $166,319 and
$171,993, respectively
    847,783       748,945  
Goodwill
    22,483       22,483  
Shareholder note
    8,691       8,498  
Other assets
    23,652       19,903  
Total assets
  $ 1,648,746     $ 1,525,302  
Liabilities and shareholders’ equity
               
                 
Liabilities:
               
Equipment purchases payable
  $ 54,871     $ 26,305  
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
    31,576       37,097  
Fair value of derivative instruments
    31,156       38,750  
Deferred income
    1,984       2,044  
Deferred income taxes
    913       1,532  
Debt:
               
Due within one year
    181,411       161,171  
Due after one year
    1,100,555       1,039,274  
Total debt
    1,281,966       1,200,445  
Total liabilities
    1,402,466       1,306,173  
Commitments and contingencies (Note 7)
               
Shareholders’ equity:
               
Preferred shares, $0.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized
           
Common shares, $0.01 par value, 400,000,000 shares authorized;
20,288,359 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2012;
20,163,359 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2011
    202       201  
Additional paid in capital
    220,199       218,879  
Retained earnings
    50,650       32,916  
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
    (24,771 )     (32,867 )
Total shareholders’ equity
    246,280       219,129  
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
  $ 1,648,746     $ 1,525,302  
 
See accompanying notes.
 
 
-1-

 
 
SeaCube Container Leasing Ltd.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Amounts in thousands, except for per share amounts)
(unaudited)
 
 
    Three months ended
September 30,
    Nine months ended
September 30,
 
   
2012
   
2011
   
2012
   
2011
 
Revenues:
                       
Equipment leasing revenue
  $ 30,754     $ 28,726     $ 90,707     $ 75,444  
Finance revenue
    16,213       13,945       49,102       40,281  
Other revenue
    2,531       2,558       8,147       7,089  
Total revenues
    49,498       45,229       147,956       122,814  
Expenses:
                               
Direct operating expenses
    1,306       2,092       4,134       4,341  
Selling, general and administrative expenses
    5,949       5,996       18,158       17,641  
Depreciation expenses
    13,328       12,242       39,485       33,159  
Provision for doubtful accounts
    224       180       894       220  
Impairment of leasing equipment held for sale
    536       539       1,946       904  
Interest expense, including non-cash interest of $1,420,
$2,320, $4,031 and $3,559, respectively
    17,763       15,424       51,370       39,283  
Interest income
    (71 )     (68 )     (209 )     (211 )
Other expenses (income), net
    (949 )     6       (2,268 )     438  
Total expenses
    38,086       36,411       113,510       95,775  
                                 
Income before provision for income taxes
    11,412       8,818       34,446       27,039  
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
          35       (127 )     (142 )
Net income
  $ 11,412     $ 8,783     $ 34,573     $ 27,181  
Net income per common share
                               
Basic
  $ 0.56     $ 0.44     $ 1.71     $ 1.35  
Diluted
  $ 0.56     $ 0.44     $ 1.71     $ 1.35  
Dividend per common share
  $ 0.29     $ 0.24     $ 0.83     $ 0.68  
 
See accompanying notes.
 
 
-2-

 
 
SeaCube Container Leasing Ltd.
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(Amounts in thousands)
(unaudited)
 
 
   
Three months ended
September 30,
   
Nine months ended
September 30,
 
   
2012
   
2011
   
2012
   
2011
 
Net income
  $ 11,412     $ 8,783     $ 34,573     $ 27,181  
                                 
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
                               
Net derivative loss reclassified into earnings
    644       1,039       2,202       2,911  
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivative instruments, net of
tax of $68,$(29), $211 and $104, respectively
    1,949       (839 )     6,012       973  
Foreign currency translation
    16       (101 )     (117 )     (65 )
Other comprehensive income
    2,609       99       8,097       3,819  
                                 
Comprehensive Income
  $ 14,021     $ 8,882     $ 42,670     $ 31,000  
 
See accompanying notes.
 
 
-3-

 
 
SeaCube Container Leasing Ltd.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Amounts in thousands)
(unaudited)
 
 
   
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
   
2012
   
2011
 
Cash flows from operating activities
           
Net income
  $ 34,573     $ 27,181  
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
               
Depreciation and amortization
    42,684       34,945  
Provision for doubtful accounts
    894       220  
Loss (gain) on sale of leasing equipment
    (2,338 )     262  
Stock based compensation
    1,322       865  
Derivative loss reclassified into earnings
    2,202       2,911  
Ineffective portion of cash flow hedges
    (1,371 )     (1,148 )
Impairment of leasing equipment held for sale
    1,946       904  
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
               
Accounts receivable
    (155 )     (8,641 )
Other assets
    464       2,906  
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities
    (3,227 )     4,078  
Deferred income
    (60 )     436  
Net cash provided by operating activities
    76,934       64,919  
Cash flows from investing activities
               
Proceeds from sale of leasing equipment
    17,125       9,715  
Collections on net investment in direct finance leases, net of interest earned
    90,601       75,936  
(Increase) decrease in restricted cash
    (4,964 )     (8,182 )
Purchase of fixed assets
    (21 )     (45 )
Purchase of leasing equipment
    (145,234 )     (257,858 )
Investment in direct financing leases
    (86,768 )     (127,042 )
Increase in Shareholder Note
    (193 )     (187 )
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
    (129,454 )     (307,663 )
Cash flows from financing activities
               
Proceeds from long-term debt
    584,000       629,000  
Repayments of long-term debt
    (502,479 )     (361,006 )
Cash paid for debt issuance fees
    (5,838 )     (7,498 )
Cash paid for derivatives
          (676 )
Dividends paid
    (16,839 )     (12,875 )
Other financing activities
    (3,126 )     (1,000 )
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
    55,718       245,945  
Effect of changes in exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents
    (119 )     (65 )
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
    3,079       3,136  
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
    15,006       17,868  
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
  $ 18,085     $ 21,004  
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information
               
Cash paid for interest
  $ 47,490     $ 33,646  
Cash paid for taxes
  $ 38     $ 191  
 
See accompanying notes.
 
 
-4-

 
 
SeaCube Container Leasing Ltd.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands, except as otherwise noted)
(unaudited)
 
 
1. Description of the Business and Basis of Presentation
 
The accompanying consolidated financial statements of SeaCube Container Leasing Ltd. (the “Company” or “SeaCube”) are unaudited and have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) for interim financial reporting and, in our opinion, reflect all adjustments, including normal recurring items, which are necessary to present fairly the results for interim periods.  Operating results for the periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire year.  Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP have been omitted in accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC; however, we believe that the disclosures are adequate to make information presented not misleading.  These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.
 
The Company purchases intermodal containers and leases them to shipping and transportation companies, both domestically and internationally. Containers include refrigerated and dry freight containers as well as generator sets, which are leased to shipping line customers through a variety of long-term and short-term contractual leasing arrangements.  The Company operates in a single segment.
 
SeaCube was incorporated by Seacastle Operating Company Ltd. (the “Initial Shareholder” or “Seacastle Operating”) in Bermuda in March 2010.  Container Leasing International, LLC (d/b/a SeaCube Containers, LLC), the entity through which we conduct all of our operations (“CLI”), was founded in 1993 and was acquired by an affiliate of the Initial Shareholder in 2006. On October 27, 2010, the SEC declared effective the registration statement relating to the Company’s initial public offering (“IPO”).

New Accounting Pronouncements
 
Adopted in 2012
 
In June 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income (“ASU 2011-05”), which eliminates the option to present other comprehensive income and its components in the statement of shareholders’ equity.  The Company may either present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements.  The Company adopted ASU 2011-05 on January 1, 2012 and now presents the components of net income and other comprehensive income in two separate but consecutive statements.
 
 
-5-

 
 
SeaCube Container Leasing Ltd.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except as otherwise noted)
(unaudited)
 
 
2. Leasing Activity
 
Equipment Leasing Revenue

The Company has noncancelable operating leases for its leasing equipment.  As of September 30, 2012, future minimum lease revenue under these agreements was estimated as follows:
 
2012
  $ 25,590  
2013
    93,536  
2014
    78,297  
2015
    68,659  
2016
    52,112  
Thereafter
    79,556  
    $ 397,750  
 
Finance Revenue

At September 30, 2012, receivables under these direct finance leases are collectible through 2024 as follows:
 
   
Total Lease
Receivables
   
Unearned
Lease Income
   
Net Lease
Receivables
 
2012
  $ 47,004     $ 15,574     $ 31,430  
2013
    184,020       54,447       129,573  
2014
    200,021       40,530       159,491  
2015
    119,898       25,967       93,931  
2016
    102,897       21,411       81,486  
Thereafter
    190,439       33,744       156,695  
    $ 844,279     $ 191,673     $ 652,606  

The Company does not record an allowance for credit losses associated with direct finance leases. The Company has had strong credit performance due to our comprehensive credit underwriting and monitoring in addition to certain attributes of our business including the size and quality of our customers and our ability to recover containers and remarket them in default situations.
 
As of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company had guaranteed and unguaranteed residual values for leasing equipment on direct finance leases of $121,415 and $113,476, respectively.  As of December 31, 2011, the Company had total lease receivables, unearned lease income and net lease receivables of $842,321, $203,073 and $639,248, respectively. The unguaranteed residual values are reflected in the ‘‘Net Lease Receivables’’ above.
 
 
-6-

 
 
SeaCube Container Leasing Ltd.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except as otherwise noted)
(unaudited)
 
 
3. Leasing Equipment
 
The following is a summary of leasing equipment recorded:
 
   
September 30, 2012
   
December 31, 2011
 
Dry containers
  $ 449,619     $ 335,922  
Refrigerated containers
    542,926       562,550  
Generator sets
    21,557       22,466  
Total
    1,014,102       920,938  
Less accumulated depreciation
    (166,319 )     (171,993 )
Leasing equipment, net of accumulated depreciation
  $ 847,783     $ 748,945  
 
There were no assets recorded under capital leases as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.

4. Borrowings
 
CLI Funding IV Credit Facility
 
On March 27, 2012, CLI Funding IV LLC, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, amended and restated in its entirety its existing credit facility, dated May 18, 2010 (as amended and restated, the “Amended and Restated Credit Agreement”).  The Amended and Restated Credit Agreement increases the total commitments of the Lenders available to $300 million from $200 million and extends the Scheduled Termination Date to March 27, 2014, from May 9, 2013.
 
CLI Funding V Credit Facility
 
On June 21, 2012, CLI Funding V LLC ("CLIF V"), an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, completed the offering of $225 million aggregate principal amount of Series 2012-1 Fixed Rate Secured Notes ("Series 2012-1 Notes"). The Series 2012-1 Notes were issued with an annual interest rate of 4.21%, have a scheduled maturity date of December 18, 2022 and a legal final maturity date of June 18, 2027. The transaction documents contain customary affirmative and negative covenants, financial covenants, representations and warranties, and events of default, which are subject to various exceptions and qualifications.
 
Container Revolving Credit Facility
 
On June 27, 2012, CLI amended and restated its existing revolving credit agreement, dated November 3, 2010 (as amended and restated, the “Fifth Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement”).  The Fifth Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement (i) increases the total commitments of the lenders available to CLI to $150 million from $120 million; and (ii) extends the Maturity Date (as defined therein) to June 27, 2015, from November 3, 2013.
 
 
-7-

 
 
SeaCube Container Leasing Ltd.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except as otherwise noted)
(unaudited)
 
 
The following is a summary of the Company’s borrowings:
 
   
September 30, 2012
   
December 31, 2011
 
Container Asset-Backed Securitizations:
           
Series 2006-1 Notes
  $ 243,501     $ 290,128  
CLI Funding III Credit Facility
    190,205       245,153  
CLI Funding IV Credit Facility
    90,000       76,000  
CLI Funding V Credit Facility
    644,260       460,164  
Unsecured Term Notes
    50,000       50,000  
Container Revolving Credit Facility
    64,000       79,000  
Total debt
    1,281,966       1,200,445  
Less current maturities
    (181,411 )     (161,171 )
Long-term debt, less current maturities
  $ 1,100,555     $ 1,039,274  
 
The Company has debt obligations that are collateralized by the Company’s restricted cash, leasing equipment and net investment in direct finance leases.  As of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, assets pledged as collateral on the Company’s debt amounted to $1,527,225 and $1,406,502, respectively.
 
5. Derivatives and Hedging Activities
 
In the normal course of business the Company utilizes interest rate derivatives to manage our exposure to interest rate risks.  Specifically, interest rate derivatives are hedging variable rate interest payments on its various debt facilities.  If certain conditions are met, an interest rate derivative may be specifically designated as a cash flow hedge.  All of the Company’s designated interest rate derivatives are cash flow hedges.  For effective cash flow hedges, changes in fair value are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and subsequently reclassified into earnings when the interest payments on the debt are recorded in earnings.
 
The Company’s interest rate derivatives involve counterparty credit risk.  As of September 30, 2012, all of the Company’s interest rate derivatives are held with counterparties or guaranteed by parties with a credit rating of at least A3 by Moody’s.  The Company monitors the credit risk associated with these instruments periodically to validate that it is probable that the counterparty (or guarantor) will perform.  As of September 30, 2012, the Company does not anticipate that any of these counterparties will fail to meet their obligations.  As of September 30, 2012, there are no credit risk related contingent features in any of the Company’s derivative agreements.
 
 
-8-

 
 
SeaCube Container Leasing Ltd.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except as otherwise noted)
(unaudited)

 
The Company held the following interest rate derivatives designated as cash flow hedges as of September 30, 2012:
 
Hedged Item
 
Current
Notional
Amount
   
Effective
Date
 
Maturity
Date
 
Floating
Rate
 
Fixed
Interest
Rate
   
Fair Value
(a)
 
CLI Funding Series 2006-1
    5,417    
Feb-2006
 
Oct-2013
 
1M LIBOR
    4.1450 %     (135 )
CLI Funding Series 2006-1
    22,708    
Feb-2006
 
Dec-2013
 
1M LIBOR
    4.2990 %     (682 )
CLI Funding Series 2006-1
    9,375    
Feb-2006
 
Dec-2013
 
1M LIBOR
    4.9200 %     (281 )
CLI Funding Series 2006-1
    124,542    
Aug-2006
 
Jun-2016
 
1M LIBOR
    5.2950 %     (13,555 )
CLI Funding Series 2006-1
    38,959    
Jan-2009
 
Aug-2016
 
1M LIBOR
    4.6400 %     (3,570 )
CLI Funding Series 2006-1
    42,500    
Jan-2009
 
Aug-2016
 
1M LIBOR
    4.9500 %     (4,029 )
CLI Funding III, LLC
       
Jun-2008
 
Jun-2018
 
1M LIBOR
    5.2900 %     (77 )
CLI Funding III, LLC
    11,003    
May-2008
 
Feb-2018
 
1M LIBOR
    4.5200 %     (1,322 )
CLI Funding III, LLC
    20,212    
May-2008
 
Jul-2017
 
1M LIBOR
    4.5300 %     (2,052 )
CLI Funding III, LLC
    44,560    
May-2008
 
Feb-2018
 
1M LIBOR
    4.2075 %     (2,994 )
CLI Funding III, LLC
    5,314    
Jul-2008
 
Jun-2016
 
1M LIBOR
    4.0500 %     (371 )
CLI Funding III, LLC
    14,500    
Jul-2008
 
Jul-2017
 
1M LIBOR
    4.1000 %     (783 )
CLI Funding III, LLC
    4,419    
Jul-2008
 
Dec-2018
 
1M LIBOR
    3.6420 %     (13 )
CLI Funding III, LLC
    32,420    
Mar-2010
 
Nov-2014
 
1M LIBOR
    2.0200 %     (875 )
CLI Funding III, LLC
    16,763    
Jan-2011
 
May-2017
 
1M LIBOR
    1.6250 %     (417 )
Total interest rate derivatives designated as cash flow hedges
  $ 392,692                         $ (31,156 )
 

 
(a)
All interest rate derivatives are recorded in fair value of derivative instruments in the liabilities section of the consolidated balance sheets.
 
The following tables set forth the net of tax effect of the Company’s cash flow hedge derivative instruments on the consolidated financial statements for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011:
 
   
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2012
 
   
Effective Portion
 
Ineffective Portion
 
Derivative Instrument
 
Change in
Unrealized (Gain)
Loss Recognized
in OCI(a)
 
Location of (Gain)
Loss reclassified
from Accumulated
OCI into Income
 
(Gain) Loss
Reclassified from Accumulated
OCI into
Income(b)
 
Location of
(Gain) Loss
Recognized Directly
in Income
 
(Gain) Loss
Recognized
Directly in
Income
 
Interest rate derivatives
    (2,210 )
Interest expense
    4,803  
Interest expense
    (434 )

   
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2011
 
   
Effective Portion
 
Ineffective Portion
 
Derivative Instrument
 
Change in
Unrealized (Gain)
Loss Recognized
in OCI(a)
 
Location of (Gain)
Loss reclassified
from Accumulated
OCI into Income
 
(Gain) Loss
Reclassified from Accumulated
OCI into
Income(b)
 
Location of
(Gain) Loss
Recognized Directly
in Income
 
(Gain) Loss
Recognized
Directly in
Income
 
Interest rate derivatives
    (6,153 )
Interest expense
    6,353  
Interest expense
    517  

   
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012
 
   
Effective Portion
 
Ineffective Portion
 
Derivative Instrument
 
Change in
Unrealized (Gain)
Loss Recognized
in OCI(a)
 
Location of (Gain)
Loss reclassified
from Accumulated
OCI into Income
 
(Gain) Loss
Reclassified from Accumulated
OCI into
Income(b)
 
Location of
(Gain) Loss
Recognized Directly
in Income
 
(Gain) Loss
Recognized
Directly in
Income
 
Interest rate derivatives
    (7,125 )
Interest expense
    15,339  
Interest expense
    (1,371 )
 
 
-9-

 
 
SeaCube Container Leasing Ltd.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except as otherwise noted)
(unaudited)

 
   
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011
 
   
Effective Portion
 
Ineffective Portion
 
Derivative Instrument
 
Change in
Unrealized (Gain)
Loss Recognized
in OCI(a)
 
Location of (Gain)
Loss reclassified
 from Accumulated
OCI into Income
 
(Gain) Loss
Reclassified from Accumulated
OCI into
Income(b)
 
Location of
(Gain) Loss
Recognized Directly
in Income
 
(Gain) Loss
Recognized
Directly in
Income
 
Interest rate derivatives
    (15,613 )
Interest expense
    19,497  
Interest expense
    (1,148 )
 

(a)
Represents the change in the fair market value of the Company’s interest rate derivatives, net of tax, offset by the amount of actual cash paid related to the net settlements of the interest rate derivatives.
 
(b)
Represents the amount of actual cash paid related to the net settlements of the interest rate derivatives and amortization of deferred losses on the Company’s terminated derivatives as follows:
 
   
Three months ended September 30,
   
Nine months ended September 30,
 
   
2012
   
2011
   
2012
   
2011
 
                         
Net settlement of interest rate derivatives
  $ 4,159     $ 5,314     $ 13,137     $ 16,586  
Amortization of terminated derivatives
    644       1,039       2,202       2,911  
 
As of September 30, 2012, the amount of Accumulated OCI related to derivatives was $23,848.  The amount of loss expected to be reclassified from OCI into interest expense over the next 12 months consists of net interest settlements on active interest rate derivatives in the amount of $14,459 and the amortization of deferred net losses on the Company’s terminated derivatives of $1,425.
 
6. Income Taxes
 
The consolidated income tax expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 was determined based upon estimates of the Company's consolidated effective income tax rates for the years ending December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The Company’s effective tax rate differs from the U.S. federal tax rate of 35% primarily due to the fact that the majority of its income is deemed to be foreign sourced and is either not taxable or taxable at effectively lower tax rates.  The Company is not subject to taxation in its country of incorporation and although the Company is subject to taxation in certain other jurisdictions, including in the U.S. and other foreign countries, these amounts are not material.  Further, given the nature of the Company's operations and activities, including where its containers are used and where the lessees of its containers (or others in possession of its containers) are located, the remainder of its earnings is not attributable to any specific tax jurisdiction and is thus not taxable.
 
7. Commitments and Contingencies
 
Purchase Commitments
 
As of September 30, 2012, commitments for capital expenditures were $2,301.
 
 
-10-

 
 
SeaCube Container Leasing Ltd.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except as otherwise noted)
(unaudited)
 

Lease Commitments
 
The Company and its subsidiaries are parties to various operating leases relating to office facilities, transportation vehicles, and certain other equipment with various expiration dates through 2016. All leasing arrangements contain normal leasing terms without unusual purchase options or escalation clauses.
 
As of September 30, 2012, the aggregate minimum rental commitment under operating leases having initial or remaining noncancelable lease terms in excess of one year was $922.
 
8. Share Based Payments
 
 
A summary of the restricted shares under the Company’s incentive plan is as follows:
 
   
Shares
   
Weighted-average
per share at
grant date
 
Nonvested at January 1, 2012
    231,207     $ 13.47  
Granted
    125,000       16.68  
Vested
    (86,132 )     12.79  
Nonvested at September 30, 2012
    270,075     $ 15.08  
 
The Company recorded compensation expense of $459 and $1,322 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, and $291 and $865 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively. Compensation expense is recorded as a component of selling, general and administrative expenses in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. Total unrecognized compensation cost was approximately $3,051 at September 30, 2012 which is expected to be recognized over the remaining weighted-average vesting period of 1.9 years.
 
9. Earnings per Share and Dividends
 
The computation of basic earnings per share is based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding including participating securities outstanding during the period.  Diluted EPS is calculated by dividing Net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period while also giving effect to all potentially dilutive common shares based on the treasury stock method.
 
In accordance with the Earnings per Share Topic, any unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and shall be included in the computation of EPS pursuant to the two-class method.  Accordingly, all of the Company’s restricted common shares are participating securities.
 
   
Three months ended September 30,
   
Nine months ended September 30,
 
   
2012
   
2011
   
2012
   
2011
 
Weighted-average shares:
                       
Common shares outstanding
    20,018,284       19,932,152       20,018,284       19,932,152  
Restricted common shares
    270,075       231,207       245,440       203,659  
Total weighted-average shares
    20,288,359       20,163,359       20,263,724       20,135,811  
 
 
-11-

 
 
SeaCube Container Leasing Ltd.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except as otherwise noted)
(unaudited)
 
 
The calculation for basic and diluted earnings per share is as follows:
 
   
Three months ended September 30,
   
Nine months ended September 30,
 
   
2012
   
2011
   
2012
   
2011
 
                         
Net income
  $ 11,412     $ 8,783     $ 34,573     $ 27,181  
Less:  Undistributed earnings allocated to restricted shareholders
    (152 )     (101 )     (419 )     (275 )
Income attributable to common shareholders
  $ 11,260     $ 8,682     $ 34,154     $ 26,906  

Income per share attributable to common shareholders:
                       
Basic
  $ 0.56     $ 0.44     $ 1.71     $ 1.35  
Diluted
  $ 0.56     $ 0.44     $ 1.71     $ 1.35  
 
There were no potentially dilutive common shares for any period in these consolidated financial statements.
 
The following table sets forth the quarterly dividends declared by our Board of Directors for the nine months ended September, 30 2012:
 
 
 
Declaration Date
 
Dividend per
Common
Share
   
Aggregate
Dividend
Amount
   
Record Date
 
Payment Date
                     
February 29, 2012
  $ 0.26     $ 5,275    
March 13, 2012
 
March 20, 2012
May 7, 2012
  $ 0.28     $ 5,681    
June 7, 2012
 
June 14, 2012
August 6, 2012
  $ 0.29     $ 5,883    
September 7, 2012
 
September 14, 2012
 
10. Related Party Transactions
 
Shareholder Note
 
In August 2010, the Company distributed $3.75 million to the Initial Shareholder in the form of a loan which was used to make interest and principal payments on Seacastle’s Credit Facility.  In September 2010, the Company distributed $4.4 million to the Initial Shareholder in the form of a loan which was used to make interest and principal payments and pay fees on Seacastle’s Credit Facility.  The loans have an annual interest rate of 3% and are payable in full upon maturity in 2015.  Interest income earned from this note was $65 and $193 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, and $64 and $187 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively.
 
Management Services
 
On September 5, 2012, the Company entered into an agreement to provide management services on container equipment that is owned in part by private equity funds that are managed by an affiliate of Fortress Investment Group LLC.  Management revenue earned from this agreement was $65 for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012
 
 
-12-

 
 
SeaCube Container Leasing Ltd.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except as otherwise noted)
(unaudited)

11. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
 
The following tables set forth the valuation of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis by input levels as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:
 
   
Fair Value
   
Fair Value Hierarchy
 
   
September 30, 2012
   
Level 1
   
Level 2
   
Level 3
 
Assets:
                       
Restricted cash
  $ 34,614     $ 34,614     $     $  
Liabilities:
                               
Derivative instruments
    31,156             31,156        

   
Fair Value
   
Fair Value Hierarchy
 
   
December 31, 2011
   
Level 1
   
Level 2
   
Level 3
 
Assets:
                       
Restricted cash
  $ 29,649     $ 29,649     $     $  
Liabilities:
                               
Derivative instruments
    38,750             38,750        
 
Restricted cash:  Restricted cash consists of cash that is held by the Company for security deposits received from lessees pursuant to the terms of various lease agreements and rent collections held in lockbox accounts pursuant to the Company’s credit facilities and securitization agreements.
 
Derivative instruments:  The Company’s interest rate derivatives are recorded at fair value on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets and consist of United States dollar denominated LIBOR-based interest rate derivatives, and their fair values are determined using cash flows discounted at relevant market interest rates in effect at the period close. The fair value generally reflects the estimated amounts that the Company would receive or pay to transfer the contracts at the reporting date and therefore reflects the Company’s or counterparty’s non-performance risk.
 
Leasing assets held for sale are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis.  The fair value is calculated using the income approach based on inputs classified as level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.  There were no other assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis.
 
The Company’s financial instruments, other than cash, consist principally of cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable, debt and interest rate derivatives.  The fair value of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximates the carrying value of these financial instruments because of their short-term nature.  The fair values of our debt are estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis, based on our current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements.
 
The carrying amounts and fair values of the Company’s financial instruments are as follows:
 
   
September 30, 2012
   
December 31, 2011
 
   
Carrying
Amount of Asset (Liability)
   
Fair Value
of Asset
(Liability)
   
Carrying
Amount of Asset (Liability)
   
Fair Value
of Asset
(Liability)
 
                         
Long-term debt
  $ (1,281,966 )   $ (1,332,756 )   $ (1,200,445 )   $ (1,206,707 )
Derivative Instrument
    (31,156 )     (31,156 )     (38,750 )     (38,750 )
 
 
-13-

 
 
SeaCube Container Leasing Ltd.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except as otherwise noted)
(unaudited)
 
 
12. Subsequent Events
 
Dividend
 
On November 5, 2012, the Company’s Board of Directors approved and declared a $0.30 per share cash dividend on its issued and outstanding common stock, payable on December 14, 2012 to shareholders of record at the close of business on December 7, 2012.
 
The Company has evaluated all significant activities through the time of filing these financial statements with the SEC and has concluded that no additional subsequent events have occurred that would require recognition in the consolidated financial statements or disclosure in the notes to the consolidated financial statements.
 
 
-14-

 

Item 2.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

This management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties.  You should read the following discussion in conjunction with our historical consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-Q and our annual audited consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011. The results of operations for the periods reflected herein are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for future periods, and our actual results may differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including but not limited to those listed under ‘‘Risk Factors’’ included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Overview
 
SeaCube Container Leasing Ltd (“SeaCube” or “the Company”) is one of the world’s largest container leasing companies based on total assets.  Containers are the primary means by which products are shipped internationally because they facilitate efficient movement of goods via multiple transportation modes including ships, rail and trucks.  The principal activities of our business include the acquisition, leasing, re-leasing and subsequent sale of refrigerated and dry containers and generator sets.  The Company leases our containers primarily under long-term contracts to a diverse group of the world’s leading shipping lines.  As of September 30, 2012, we employ 77 people in seven offices worldwide and have total assets of $1.6 billion.
 
As of September 30, 2012, we own or manage a fleet of 703,305 units, representing 1,092,091 TEUs of containers and generator sets.  For the three months ended September 30, 2012, our average utilization was 97.9%, as measured in units.
 
We lease three types of assets:

Refrigerated containers (‘‘reefers’’), which are used for perishable items such as fresh and frozen foods;
Dry freight containers, which are used for general cargo such as manufactured component parts, consumer staples and apparel; and
Generator sets (‘‘gensets’’), which are diesel generators used to provide mobile power to reefers.
 
We lease these assets on a per diem basis on two principal lease types under which the lessee is responsible for all operating costs including taxes, insurance and maintenance:

Operating leases, typically with initial terms of five to eight years, under which containers are re-leased or returned to us at expiration of the initial lease; and
Direct finance leases, which are typically structured as long-term leases with a bargain purchase option, under which ownership transfers to the lessee at expiration of the lease.
 
The tables below summarize the composition of our fleet by unit, TEU and our owned fleet by net book value as of September 30, 2012:

Equipment Fleet by Units
 
   
   
Refrigerated
   
Dry
   
Gensets
   
Total
 
Operating Leases
    34,647       143,476       2,492       180,615  
Direct Finance Leases
    26,034       243,984       2,556       272,574  
Total Owned
    60,681       387,460       5,048       453,189  
Managed
    30,216       218,562       1,338       250,116  
Total Fleet
    90,897       606,022       6,386       703,305  
 
 
-15-

 
 
Equipment Fleet by TEUs
 
   
   
Refrigerated
   
Dry
   
Gensets
   
Total
 
Operating Leases
    63,988       222,752       2,492       289,232  
Direct Finance Leases
    50,617       376,961       2,556       430,134  
Total Owned
    114,605       599,713       5,048       719,366  
Managed
    57,352       314,035       1,338       372,725  
Total Fleet
    171,957       913,748       6,386       1,092,091  
 
Container Fleet by Net Book Value
 
   
   
Refrigerated
   
Dry
   
Gensets
   
Total
 
Operating Leases
  $ 417,091     $ 419,651     $ 11,041     $ 847,783  
Direct Finance Leases
    225,358       414,187       13,061       652,606  
Total Fleet
  $ 642,449     $ 833,838     $ 24,102     $ 1,500,389  

Results of Operations
 
Comparison of the Three Months Ended September 30, 2012 to the Three Months Ended September 30, 2011
 
   
Three Months Ended
   
Three Months Ended
     
   
September 30, 2012
   
September 30, 2011
   
$ Change
   
% Change
   
   
(dollars in thousands)
Equipment leasing revenue
  $ 30,754     $ 28,726     $ 2,028       7 %
Finance revenue
    16,213       13,945       2,268       16 %
Other revenue
    2,531       2,558       (27 )     -1 %
Total revenues
  $ 49,498     $ 45,229     $ 4,269       9 %
 
Revenue
 
Total revenue was $49.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012 compared to $45.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011, an increase of $4.3 million or 9%.
 
Equipment leasing revenue was $30.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012 compared to $28.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011, an increase of $2.0 million or 7%.  This was primarily due to the average on-hire fleet increasing by approximately 40,600 units.
 
Finance revenue was $16.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012 compared to $13.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011, an increase of $2.3 million or 16%.  The increase was the result of new investments that increased the average size of our finance lease portfolio.
 
Other revenue, which includes management fee revenues and re-billable costs to our lessees, was $2.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012 compared to $2.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011.  This small decrease was attributable to higher rebillable costs which were offset by lower management fee revenues.
 
 
-16-

 
 
   
Three Months Ended
   
Three Months Ended
     
   
September 30, 2012
   
September 30, 2011
   
$ Change
   
% Change
   
(dollars in thousands)
   
Direct operating expenses
  $ 1,306     $ 2,092     $ (786 )     -38 %
Selling, general and administrative expenses
    5,949       5,996       (47 )     -1 %
Depreciation expenses
    13,328       12,242       1,086       9 %
Provision for doubtful accounts
    224       180       44       *  
Impairment of leasing equipment held for sale
    536       539       (3 )     *  
Total
  $ 21,343     $ 21,049     $ 294       1 %

*Not meaningful.
 
Direct Operating Expenses
 
Direct operating expenses were $1.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012 compared to $2.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011, a decrease of $0.8 million or 38%.  In the prior year period, we incurred higher recovery costs attributable to one customer.
 
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
 
Selling, general and administrative expenses were $5.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012 compared to $6.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011, a slight decrease.  Slightly higher compensation expenses were offset by savings in travel, professional and legal fees.
 
Depreciation Expenses
 
Depreciation of leasing equipment was $13.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012 compared to $12.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011, an increase of $1.1 million or 9%. Depreciation on new additions net of disposals and sales accounted for an increase of $1.5 million, which was partially offset by a decrease of $0.4 million due to equipment reaching the end of their depreciable lives.
 
Provision for Doubtful Accounts
 
Provision for doubtful accounts was $0.2 million for both the three months ended September 30, 2012 and September 30, 2011.
 
Impairment of Leasing Equipment Held for Sale
 
We recorded an impairment of leasing equipment held for sale of $0.5 million for both the three months ended September 30, 2012 and September 30, 2011. We evaluate the recovery of our containers and gensets designated for sale and record a loss if the ultimate sales value is expected to be below the current carrying cost.  The majority of our impairments occur at the conclusion of an operating lease when our equipment is older and has incurred a certain amount of damage that the lessee is responsible for.  These impairments do not include amounts that we recover from lessees to return containers to leasable condition, in accordance with industry standards. We bill our lessees for the cost to repair equipment to this industry standard even if we do not repair the container. This revenue is recorded as Other Revenue and not a reduction of impairment losses.  The number of units that were returned and expected to be sold were similar in the current and prior year periods.
 
 
-17-

 

   
Three Months Ended
   
Three Months Ended
     
   
September 30, 2012
   
September 30, 2011
   
$ Change
   
% Change
   
(dollars in thousands)
   
Interest expense
  $ 17,763     $ 15,424     $ 2,339       15 %
Interest income
    (71 )     (68 )     (3 )     4 %
Other expenses (income), net
    (949 )     6       (955 )     *  
Total
  $ 16,743     $ 15,362     $ 1,381       9 %

*Not meaningful.
 
Interest Expense
 
Interest expense was $17.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012 compared to $15.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011, an increase of $2.3 million or 15%.  Our weighted average debt balance for the three months ended September 30, 2012 increased by approximately $203 million due to our investment in new containers.  This resulted in an increase of approximately $2.9 million to interest expense.  In addition, we had slightly higher commitment fees in the current year of $0.3 million.  These increases were offset by a decrease in non-cash interest expense in the current period by $0.9 million.  Higher amortization of deferred financing fees of $0.4 million was offset by an increase in gains recognized directly into income for ineffective derivatives of $0.9 million and lower amortization of terminated derivatives of $0.4 million.
 
Interest Income
 
Interest income was $0.1 million for both the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011.
 
Other Expense (Income), Net
 
Other expense (income), net was $(0.9) million for the three months ended September 30, 2012 compared to $0.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011.  This is attributable to higher gains on the sale of equipment in the current year period due to more containers being returned and sold upon the completion of leases.
 
   
Three Months Ended
   
Three Months Ended
     
   
September 30, 2012
   
September 30, 2011
   
$ Change
   
% Change
 
   
(dollars in thousands)
   
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
  $     $ 35     $ (35 )     *  

 *Not meaningful.
 
Provision (benefit) for income taxes was $0.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012 compared to $0.03 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011. The change in the effective tax rate is primarily attributable to the impact of the U.S. effectively connected income tax liability on the overall provision calculation.
 
 
-18-

 
 
   
Three Months Ended
   
Three Months Ended
     
   
September 30, 2012
   
September 30, 2011
   
$ Change
   
% Change
   
(dollars in thousands)
   
Net income
  $ 11,412     $ 8,783     $ 2,629       30 %
Adjusted net income**
  $ 12,832     $ 11,111     $ 1,721       15 %
Adjusted EBITDA**
  $ 74,172     $ 61,589     $ 12,583       20 %

**Adjusted net income and adjusted EBITDA are measures of financial and operational performance that are not defined by U.S. GAAP.  See “Non-GAAP Measures” for the discussion of adjusted net income and adjusted EBITDA as a non-GAAP measures and their reconciliation to net income (loss).
 
Net Income
 
Net income was $11.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012 compared to $8.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011. The increase in net income was attributable to the items above.
 
Adjusted Net Income
 
Adjusted net income was $12.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012 compared to $11.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011, an increase of $1.7 million or 15%. In addition to the changes in net income noted above, the three months ended September 30, 2012, includes a decrease in non-cash interest expense of $0.9 million, which is excluded from the adjusted net income calculation.
 
Adjusted EBITDA
 
Adjusted EBITDA was $74.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012 compared to $61.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011, an increase of $12.6 million or 20%. In addition to the changes in net income noted above, the three months ended September 30, 2012, includes higher depreciation of $1.1 million and higher interest expense of $2.3 million, which are excluded from the adjusted EBITDA calculation.  In addition, the current year period had higher collections on investments in direct financing leases of $6.6 million.
 
Comparison of the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 to the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011

   
Nine Months Ended
   
Nine Months Ended
       
   
September 30, 2012
   
September 30, 2011
   
$ Change
   
% Change
 
   
(dollars in thousands)
 
Equipment leasing revenue
  $ 90,707     $ 75,444     $ 15,263       20 %
Finance revenue
    49,102       40,281       8,821       22 %
Other revenue
    8,147       7,089       1,058       15 %
Total revenues
  $ 147,956     $ 122,814     $ 25,142       20 %
 
Revenue
 
Total revenue was $148.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 compared to $122.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, an increase of $25.1 million or 20%.
 
Equipment leasing revenue was $90.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 compared to $75.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, an increase of $15.3 million or 20%.  This was primarily due to the average on-hire fleet increasing by approximately 44,500 units.
 
 
-19-

 

Finance revenue $49.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 compared to $40.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, an increase of $8.8 million or 22%.  The increase was the result of new investments that increased the average size of our finance lease portfolio.
 
Other revenue, which includes management fee revenues and re-billable costs to our lessees, was $8.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 compared to $7.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, an increase of $1.1 million or 15%. This increase was attributable to higher rebillable costs of $1.3 million, which were partially offset by lower management fee revenues of $0.2 million.
 
   
Nine Months Ended
   
Nine Months Ended
     
   
September 30, 2012
   
September 30, 2011
   
$ Change
   
% Change
   
(dollars in thousands)
   
Direct operating expenses
  $ 4,134     $ 4,341     $ (207 )     -5 %
Selling, general and administrative expenses
    18,158       17,641       517       3 %
Depreciation expenses
    39,485       33,159       6,326       19 %
Provision for doubtful accounts
    894       220       674       *  
Impairment of leasing equipment held for sale
    1,946       904       1,042       *  
Total
  $ 64,617     $ 56,265     $ 8,352       15 %

*Not meaningful.
 
Direct Operating Expenses
 
Direct operating expenses were $4.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 compared to $4.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, a decrease of $0.2 million or 5%.  During the current year period, more containers were returned upon the completion of their lease than in the prior year period resulting in higher positioning as well as maintenance and repair costs.  This was offset by higher recovery costs incurred in the prior year that were attributable to one customer.
 
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
 
Selling, general and administrative expenses were $18.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 compared to $17.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, an increase of $0.5 million or 3%.  This is primarily due to merit increases and higher incentive compensation expense that was partially offset by savings in travel, professional and legal fees.
 
Depreciation Expenses
 
Depreciation of leasing equipment was $39.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 compared to $33.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, an increase of $6.3 million or 19%. Depreciation on new additions net of disposals and sales accounted for an increase of $7.1 million, which was partially offset by a decrease of $0.8 million due to equipment reaching the end of their depreciable lives.
 
Provision for Doubtful Accounts
 
Provision for doubtful accounts was $0.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 compared to $0.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. In the current year period, provision for doubtful account increased moderately compared to the prior year period.
 
Impairment of Leasing Equipment Held for Sale
 
We recorded an impairment of leasing equipment held for sale of $1.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 compared to $0.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, an increase of $1.0 million. We evaluate the recovery of our containers and gensets designated for sale and record a loss if the ultimate sales value is expected to be below the current carrying cost.  The majority of our impairments occur at the conclusion of an operating lease when our equipment is older and has incurred a certain amount of damage that the lessee is responsible for.  These impairments do not include amounts that we recover from lessees to return containers to leasable condition, in accordance with industry standards. We bill our lessees for the cost to repair equipment to this industry standard even if we do not repair the container. This revenue is recorded as Other Revenue and not a reduction of impairment losses.  In the current year period, we had more containers returned and sold upon the completion of their lease term.
 
 
-20-

 
 
   
Nine Months Ended
   
Nine Months Ended
     
   
September 30, 2012
   
September 30, 2011
   
$ Change
   
% Change
   
(dollars in thousands)
   
Interest expense
  $ 51,370     $ 39,283     $ 12,087       31 %
Interest income
    (209 )     (211 )     2       -1 %
Other expenses (income), net
    (2,268 )     438       (2,706 )     *  
Total
  $ 48,893     $ 39,510     $ 9,383       24 %

*Not meaningful.
 
Interest Expense
 
Interest expense was $51.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 compared to $39.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, an increase of $12.1 million or 31%.  Our weighted average debt balance for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 increased by approximately $291 million due to our investment in new containers.  This resulted in an increase of approximately $11.4 million to interest expense.  In the current year period, there were slightly higher commitment fees of $0.2 million.  In addition, non-cash interest expense increased in the current period by $0.5 million, which included higher amortization of deferred financing fees of $1.4 million partially offset by increases in gains recognized directly into income for ineffective derivatives of $0.2 million and by lower amortization of terminated derivatives of $0.7 million.
 
Interest Income
 
Interest income was $0.2 million for both the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011.
 
Other Expense (Income), Net
 
Other expense (income), net was $(2.3) million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 compared to $0.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011.  This is attributable to higher gains on the sale of equipment in the current year period due to more containers being returned and sold upon the completion of leases.
 
   
Nine Months Ended
   
Nine Months Ended
     
   
September 30, 2012
   
September 30, 2011
   
$ Change
   
% Change
 
   
(dollars in thousands)
   
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
  $ (127 )   $ (142 )   $ 15       *  

 *Not meaningful.
 
Provision (benefit) for income taxes was $(0.1) million for both the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and September 30, 2011. The change in the effective tax rate is primarily attributable to the impact of the U.S. effectively connected income tax liability on the overall provision calculation.
 
 
-21-

 
 
   
Nine Months Ended
   
Nine Months Ended
     
   
September 30, 2012
   
September 30, 2011
   
$ Change
   
% Change
   
(dollars in thousands)
   
Net income
  $ 34,573     $ 27,181     $ 7,392       27 %
Adjusted net income**
  $ 38,619     $ 30,760     $ 7,859       26 %
Adjusted EBITDA**
  $ 215,693     $ 175,206     $ 40,487       23 %

**Adjusted net income and adjusted EBITDA are measures of financial and operational performance that are not defined by U.S. GAAP.  See “Non-GAAP Measures” for the discussion of adjusted net income and adjusted EBITDA as a non-GAAP measures and their reconciliation to net income (loss).
 
Net Income
 
Net income was $34.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 compared to $27.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. The increase in net income was attributable to the items above.
 
Adjusted Net Income
 
Adjusted net income was $38.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 compared to $30.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, an increase of $7.9 million or 26%. In addition to the changes in net income noted above, the nine months ended September 30, 2012, includes an increase in the non-cash interest expense of $0.5 million, which is excluded from the adjusted net income calculation.
 
Adjusted EBITDA
 
Adjusted EBITDA was $215.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 compared to $175.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, an increase of $40.5 million or 23%. In addition to the changes in net income noted above, the nine months ended September 30, 2012, includes higher depreciation of $6.3 million and higher interest expense of $12.1 million, which are excluded from the adjusted EBITDA calculation.  In addition, the current year period had higher collections on investments in direct financing leases of $14.7 million.
 
Liquidity and Capital Resources
 
We have historically met our liquidity requirements primarily from the following sources:
 
 
Revenues including operating lease revenues, total finance lease collections, billings to lessors for repairs and maintenance, and asset management fees. Cash flows from operating activities and principal collections on finance leases were $167.5 million and $140.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
 
 
Lines of credit and other secured borrowings, under which $1,282.0 million was outstanding and $296 million was available as of September 30, 2012.
 
 
Sales of our older leasing equipment, which was $17.1 million and $9.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
 
We expect that our cash flows from our operations, principal collections on direct finance leases, existing credit facilities and sales of older equipment will be sufficient to meet our liquidity needs.  Our current projections of cash flows from operations and the availability of funds under our revolving credit agreement are expected to be sufficient to fund our maturing debt and contractual obligations in the next several years.  In the future, we will need to borrow funds to finance the purchases of new assets we intend to buy to expand our business.
 
On March 27, 2012, CLI Funding IV LLC, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, amended and restated in its entirety its existing credit facility, dated May 18, 2010 (as amended and restated, the “Amended and Restated Credit Agreement”).  The Amended and Restated Credit Agreement increases the total commitments of the Lenders available to $300 million from $200 million and extends the Scheduled Termination Date to March 27, 2014, from May 9, 2013.  On June 21, 2012, CLI Funding V LLC, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, completed the offering of $225 million aggregate principal amount of Series 2012-1 Fixed Rate Secured Notes ("Series 2012-1 Notes"). The Series 2012-1 Notes were issued with an annual interest rate of 4.21%, have a scheduled maturity date of December 18, 2022 and a legal final maturity date of June 18, 2027. The transaction documents contain customary affirmative and negative covenants, financial covenants, representations and warranties, and events of default, which are subject to various exceptions and qualifications. On June 27, 2012, CLI amended and restated its existing revolving credit agreement, dated November 3, 2010 (as amended and restated, the “Fifth Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement”).  The Fifth Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement (i) increases the total commitments of the lenders available to CLI to $150 million from $120 million; and (ii) extends the Maturity Date (as defined therein) to June 27, 2015, from November 3, 2013. We will use the net proceeds of these offerings for container purchases and other general business purposes.
 
 
-22-

 
 
Foreign Cash
 
As of September 30, 2012, substantially all of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents are held in banks in the United States.
 
Covenants
 
The Company’s debt instruments contain typical representations and covenants for loans of this type that, among other things, restrict the ability of CLI and certain restricted subsidiaries, to incur indebtedness and/or create liens against its assets and/or to make investments, to dispose of assets, to merge or consolidate with any other person, to engage in transactions with affiliates except on an arm's-length basis in the ordinary course of business, or  to incur certain restrictions or prohibitions on granting liens and/or making distributions, dividends or similar payments. For all of our asset-backed securitizations and our Container Revolving Credit Facility, CLI shall not permit the tangible net worth of CLI and its subsidiaries at any time to be less than the amount stated in the respective agreements ($175 million for the CLI Funding Series 2006-1 Notes and the CLI Funding V Credit Facility and $200 million for the Container Revolving Credit Facility, the CLI Funding III Credit Facility, and the CLI Funding IV Credit Facility). In addition, for the Container Revolving Credit Facility and the CLI Funding IV Credit Facility, CLI will also be required to comply with a maximum consolidated leverage ratio of 5.25 times adjusted EBITDA through the third anniversary of the facility and of 5.00 times adjusted EBITDA with respect to the time period thereafter.  At September 30, 2012, the Company was in compliance with all of the covenants described above.
 
Liquidity Needs to Acquire Equipment to be Leased
 
The acquisition of leasing assets fuels our growth. As a result, we expect to invest substantial funds to acquire containers and gensets, although there can be no assurances as to the timing and amount of such acquisitions.  Going forward, provided there is sufficient demand, production capacity, appropriate pricing and available financing, we intend to invest in new containers at a level that is consistent with our historical investment activity. As of October 26, 2012, SeaCube has ordered approximately $318.8 million of new equipment for delivery through January 2013.  Of this amount, approximately $272.4 million, or 85%, has been committed to long-term leases.
 
 
-23-

 

Cash Flow
 
The following table sets forth cash flow information for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011.
 
   
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2012
   
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2011
 
   
(dollars in thousands)
 
Net cash provided by operating activities
  $ 76,934     $ 64,919  
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
    (129,454 )     (307,663 )
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
    55,718       245,945  
Effect of changes in exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents
    (119 )     (65 )
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
  $ 3,079     $ 3,136  

Net cash provided by operating activities was $76.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 compared to $64.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, a $12.0 million increase. The increase in operating cash flow was primarily the result of increased profitability.
 
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities was $(129.5) million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 compared to $(307.7) million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, an increase of $178.2 million to cash flow.  The primary driver of the increase is the timing of purchases of leased equipment as well as investment in direct finance leases.  Our restricted cash balances increased by $5.0 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2012 versus $8.2 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2011. In addition, we had higher collections on net investment in direct finance leases and higher proceeds from the sale of leasing equipment of $14.7 million and $7.4 million, respectively.
 
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities was $55.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 compared to $245.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, a decrease of $190.2 million to cash flow.  During the current period, the proceeds of long-term debt (net of payments) decreased by $186.5 million versus the prior period.  In conjunction with the closing of the Series 2012-1 Notes and the restatement of the revolving credit facility in the current year period, we incurred debt issuance costs of $5.8 million. In conjunction with the closing of the Series 2011-1 Notes and the repayment of the borrowings under CLIF IV in the prior year period, we incurred debt issuance costs of $3.8 million and paid $0.7 million, which represented the fair value of the derivative on the CLIF IV borrowings.  In addition, there were higher dividends paid during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 of $4.0 million.
 
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
 
We did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as of September 30, 2012.
 
 
-24-

 

Non-GAAP Measures
 
Adjusted Net Income
 
Adjusted net income is a measure of financial and operating performance that is not defined by U.S. GAAP and should not be considered a substitute for net income, income from operations or cash flow from operations, as determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP.  Adjusted net income is a measure of our operating and financial performance used by management to focus on consolidated financial and operating performance exclusive of income and expenses that relate to non-routine or significant non-cash items of the business.
 
We define adjusted net income (loss) as net income before non-cash interest expense related to amortization of deferred financing fees, terminations and modifications of derivative instruments, losses on retirement of debt, fair value adjustments on derivative instruments, loss on swap terminations, and write-offs of goodwill. We use adjusted net income to assess our consolidated financial and operating performance, and we believe this non-GAAP measure is helpful to management and investors in identifying trends in our performance. This measure helps management make decisions which are expected to facilitate meeting current financial goals as well as achieve optimal financial performance. Adjusted net income provides us with a measure of financial performance of the business based on operational factors including the profitability of assets on an economic basis net of operating expenses and the capital costs of the business on a consistent basis as it removes the impact of certain non-routine and non-cash items from our operating results.  Adjusted net income is a key metric used by senior management and our board of directors to review the consolidated financial performance of the business.
 
The following table shows the reconciliation of net income, the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measure to adjusted net income:
 
   
Three Months Ended September 30,
   
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
   
2012
   
2011
   
2012
   
2011
 
Net income
  $ 11,412     $ 8,783     $ 34,573     $ 27,181  
Non-cash interest expense, net of tax
    1,420       2,328       4,046       3,579  
Adjusted net income
  $ 12,832     $ 11,111     $ 38,619     $ 30,760  

 
-25-

 

Adjusted EBITDA
 
Adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“adjusted EBITDA”) is a measure of financial and operating performance that is not defined by U.S. GAAP and should not be considered a substitute for net income, income from operations or cash flow from operations, as determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
 
We define adjusted EBITDA as income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes, interest expenses including loss on retirement of debt, depreciation and amortization, fair value adjustments on derivative instruments, loss on terminations and modification of derivative instruments, gain on sale of assets, and write-offs of goodwill plus principal collections on direct finance lease receivables.  We use adjusted EBITDA in a number of ways to assess our consolidated financial and operating performance, and we believe this measure is helpful to management, the board of directors and investors in identifying trends in our performance. We use adjusted EBITDA as a measure of our consolidated operating performance exclusive of income and expenses that relate to the financing, income taxes, and capitalization of the business. Also, adjusted EBITDA assists us in comparing our operating performance on a consistent basis as it removes the impact of our capital structure (primarily interest charges on our outstanding debt) and asset base (primarily depreciation and amortization) from our operating results. In addition, Adjusted EBITDA helps management identify controllable expenses and make decisions designed to help us meet our current financial goals and optimize our financial performance. Accordingly, we believe this metric measures our financial performance based on operational factors that management can impact in the short-term, namely the cost structure and expenses of the organization. Lastly, adjusted EBITDA is the basis for calculating selected financial ratios as required in the debt covenants of one of our credit facilities and one of our management agreements.
 
The following table shows the reconciliation of net income, the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measure to adjusted EBITDA:
 
SeaCube Container Leasing Ltd.
Non-GAAP Reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA
(Amounts in thousands)
(unaudited)

   
Three months ended September 30,
   
Nine months ended September 30,
 
   
2012
   
2011
   
2012
   
2011
 
Net income
  $ 11,412     $ 8,783     $ 34,573     $ 27,181  
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
          35       (127 )     (142 )
Depreciation expenses
    13,328       12,242       39,485       33,159  
Interest expense, net of interest income
    17,692       15,356       51,161       39,072  
Collections on net investment in direct financing leases, net of interest earned
    31,740       25,173       90,601       75,936  
Adjusted EBITDA
  $ 74,172     $ 61,589     $ 215,693     $ 175,206  
 
New Accounting Pronouncements
 
Adopted in 2012
 
In June 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income (“ASU 2011-05”), which eliminates the option to present other comprehensive income and its components in the statement of shareholders’ equity.  The Company may either present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements.  The Company adopted ASU 2011-05 on January 1, 2012 and now presents the components of net income and other comprehensive income in two separate but consecutive statements.
 
 
-26-

 
 
Item 3.   Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
 
 
Exchange Rate Risk
 
While our leasing per diems are billed and paid to us in U.S. dollars, we are subject to exchange gains and losses for local currency expenditures. We record the effect of non-U.S. dollar currency transactions when we translate the non-U.S. subsidiaries’ financial statements into U.S. dollars using exchange rates as they exist at the end of each month.
 
 
Interest Rate Risk
 
We have long-term debt obligations that accrue interest at variable rates. Interest rate changes may therefore impact the amount of interest payments, future earnings and cash flows. We have entered into interest rate swap agreements to mitigate the impact of changes in interest rates that may result from fluctuations in the variable rates of interest accrued by our long-term debt obligations.  Based on the debt obligation payable as of September 30, 2012, we estimate that cash flows from interest expense relating to variable rate debt and the relevant interest rate swap agreement would increase by $0.04 million on an annual basis in the event interest rates were to increase by 10%.
 
 
Credit Risk
 
We are subject to concentrations of credit risk with respect to amounts due from customers. We seek to limit our credit risk by performing ongoing credit evaluations and, when deemed necessary, require letters of credit, guarantees or collateral. Our credit policy sets different maximum exposure guidelines for each customer. Credit criteria may include, but are not limited to, customer trade route, country, social and political climate, assessments of net worth, asset ownership, bank and trade credit references, credit bureau reports, operational history and financial strength.
 
We seek to reduce credit risk by maintaining insurance coverage against customer insolvency and related equipment losses. We maintain contingent physical damage, recovery and loss of revenue insurance, which provides coverage in the event of a customer’s insolvency, bankruptcy or default giving rise to our demand for return of all of our equipment. Subject to the policy’s deductible and other terms and conditions, it covers the cost of recovering our equipment, damage to the equipment, loss of equipment and, to a limited extent, lost revenues. This coverage automatically renews for one additional one-year term on the anniversary of the commencement date subject to maintaining a certain claim experience rate.
 
Our hedging transactions using derivative instruments have counterparty credit risk. The counterparties to our derivative arrangements and repurchase agreements are major financial institutions with high credit ratings. As a result, we do not anticipate that any of these counterparties will fail to meet their obligations. However, there can be no assurance that we will be able to adequately protect against this risk and will ultimately realize an economic benefit from our hedging strategies or recover the full value of the securities underlying our repurchase agreements in the event of a default by a counterparty.
 
 
Provision for Doubtful Accounts
 
The provision for doubtful accounts includes our estimate of allowances necessary for receivables on both operating and direct financing lease receivables. The provision for doubtful accounts is developed based on two key components (1) specific reserves for receivables which are impaired for which management believes full collection is doubtful and (2) reserves for estimated losses inherent in the receivables based upon historical trends. We believe our provision for doubtful accounts is adequate to provide for credit losses inherent in our accounts receivable. The provision for doubtful accounts requires the application of estimates and judgments as to the outcome of collection efforts and the realization of collateral, among other things. In addition, changes in economic conditions or other events may necessitate additions or deductions to the provision for doubtful accounts. Direct financing leases are evaluated on a case-by-case basis. When evaluating our operating and direct financing lease receivables for impairment, we consider, among other things, the level of past due amounts of the respective receivable, the borrower’s financial condition, credit quality indicators of the borrower, the value of underlying collateral and third party credit enhancements such as guarantees and insurance policies. Once a direct financing lease is determined to be non-performing, our procedures provide for the following events to take place in order to evaluate collectability:
 
 
-27-

 
 
 
The past due amounts are reclassified to accounts receivable,
 
 
The equipment value supporting such direct financing lease is reclassified to leasing equipment, and
 
 
Collectability is evaluated, taking into consideration equipment book value and the total outstanding receivable, as well as the likelihood of collection through the recovery of equipment.
 
The adequacy of our provision for doubtful accounts is provided based upon a monthly review of the collectability of our receivables. This review is based on the risk profile of the receivables, credit quality indicators such as the level of past-due amounts and economic conditions, as well as the value of underlying collateral in the case of direct financing lease receivables.
 
Item 4.   Controls and Procedures
 
(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

The Company’s management, with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of September 30, 2012.  Based on such evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of September 30, 2012, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective at the reasonable assurance level.
 
(b) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.

There have not been any changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
 
-28-

 
 
PART II.   OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.
Legal Proceedings

We have been, and may from time to time be, involved in litigation and claims incidental to the conduct of our business in the ordinary course. Our industry is also subject to scrutiny by government regulators, which could result in enforcement proceedings or litigation related to regulatory compliance matters. We maintain insurance policies in amounts and with the coverage and deductibles we believe are adequate, based on the nature and risks of our business, historical experience and industry standards. As of the date of this Form 10-Q, we are not a party to any material legal or adverse regulatory proceedings.

Item 1A.
Risk Factors

In addition to the information set forth in this Form 10-Q, you should carefully consider the risk factors described under the caption "Risk Factors" in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011. As of the date of this Form 10-Q, there have been no significant changes from the risk factors previously disclosed therein.

Item 2.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
 
NONE

Item 3.
Defaults Upon Senior Securities

NONE

Item 4.
Mine Safety Disclosures

NONE

Item 5.
Other Information
 
NONE
 
 
-29-

 
 
Item 6.
Exhibits

Exhibit No.
 
Description
31.1
 
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2
 
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1
 
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2
 
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.INS
 
XBRL Instance Document.
101.SCH
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
101.CAL
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
101.DEF
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
101.LAB
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
101.PRE
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.

 
-30-

 
 
SIGNATURES



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned there unto duly authorized.

Date:    November 6, 2012
   
 
 
 
   
SEACUBE CONTAINER LEASING LTD.
   
Registrant
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Stephen P. Bishop
   
Stephen P. Bishop
   
Chief Operating and Chief Financial Officer
   
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer and
   
Duly Authorized Officer)
 
 
-31-