U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-QSB

(Mark One)
[X] Quarterly report under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004
[ ] Transition report under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the transition period from __________	to ___________

Commission File Number 33-17598-NY

Check whether the issuer: (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the issuer was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes   X       No  ___

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS

State the number of shares outstanding for each of the issuer's classes of common equity, as of November 15, 2004 :249,895,892 shares

Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (check one): Yes ___     No   X   

The Tirex Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of
September 30, 2004

Consolidated Statements of Operations
for the three month periods
ended September 30, 2004 and 2003

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
for the three month periods
ended September 30, 2004 and 2003

Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited)

PART II B OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1 - Legal Proceedings

Item 2 - Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds

Item 3 - Defaults Upon Senior Securities

Item 4 - Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

Item 5 - Other Information

Item 6 - Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

THE TIREX CORPORATION
A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2004

THE TIREX CORPORATION
A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2004

THE TIREX CORPORATION
A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2004

An action was instituted by Plaintiffs, an individual and a corporation, in a Canadian court alleging a breach of contract and claims damages of approximately $508,600 representing expenses and an additional approximate amount of $1,874,000 in loss of profits. The current action follows two similar actions taken in United States courts, the first of which was withdrawn and the second of which was dismissed based on forum non convenience and other considerations. A detailed answer has been filed by the Company denying all liability, stating further that Plaintiffs failed to comply with their obligations. Counsel for the Company believes that the Company has meritorious defenses to all of the Plaintiff's claims. The action is still pending.

A Plaintiff instituted an action, a corporation, in August 2001 in a Canadian court claiming approximately $63,000 is due and owing for the manufacture and delivery of tire disintegrators. The Company has prepared its defense and a cross claim against the Plaintiff as the product delivered was defective and the Company believes it is entitled to a reimbursement of sums paid. The action is still pending.

An action was instituted by a Plaintiff, the Company's landlord, against the Company in June 2001 for arrears of rent in the amount of approximately $113,900. Subsequent additions to arrearages with respect to rent and property taxes raised the amount due to approximately $560,000. A settlement agreement with the former landlord is in place, under the terms of which the Company would pay to the former landlord the sum of $140,000 from the proceeds to the Company of revenues from the first four sales of TCS Systems.

The deficit accumulated during the development stage included accumulated comprehensive other income totaling $103,396.

The Company's management, with the participation of its Chief Executive Officer, who is the Company's principal executive officer, and its Chief Financial Officer, who is the Company's principal financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, 2004. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures are effective in alerting them in a timely manner to material information relating to The Tirex Corporation, including its consolidated subsidiaries, required to be included in this report and the other reports that the Company files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. During the first fiscal quarter of 2005, there have been no changes in the Company's internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or that are reasonably likely to materially affect, its internal control over financial reporting.

The following is management's discussion and analysis of significant factors which have affected the Company's financial position and operations during the three month period ended September 30, 2004. This discussion also includes events which occurred subsequent to the end of the last quarter and contains both historical and forward-looking statements. When used in this discussion, the words "expect(s)", "feel(s)","believe(s)", "will", "may", "anticipate(s)" "intend(s)" and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected.

In March 2000, we announced that our tire recycling technology was ready for replication and commercialization. Since Fiscal 2001, we have demonstrated our technology to numerous groups from Asia, Europe, North and South and America and the Caribbean, as well as to some shareholders and potential strategic alliance partners. While numerous Letters of Intent were signed during the early marketing stage, none materialized into firm purchase contracts. Management attributed these failures to proceed to firm contracts to the lack of a track record for the TCS technology, or alternatively, to the Company's inability to provide performance guarantees. The Company signed its License Agreement with Simpro S.p.A. of Italy in January of 2003, and thus created the potential that performance guarantees could be offered. As of September 30, 2004, no purchase/sale contracts had been written.

Tirex has continued with its marketing structure consisting primarily of independent representatives who have the possibility of gaining semi-exclusivities in certain territories based on sales results. Our manufacturing partner, Simpro, has a non-exclusive marketing agreement applicable on a worldwide basis. The previous marketing agreement with Mr. Louis Sanzaro, through one of his companies, respecting the US market is no longer effective. The Company continues to entertain requests for marketing agreements on several continents, but steadfastly adheres to its policy of not providing exclusivities in the absence of prior-established results.

In January 2003, the Company entered into a License Agreement with Simpro S.p.A. for exclusive manufacturing rights and for non-exclusive marketing rights with respect to TCS Systems. Simpro is actually negotiating with the Italian government respecting the financing of the construction of a new demonstration model in Italy, which it plans to use to support their marketing efforts. To date, Simpro has not sold any systems.

The lack of a significant track record relative to the operation and output of the TCS System has proven to be difficult hurdle to overcome in making TCS System sales. The installed cost of a TCS-1 System to an entrepreneur, depending on the system configuration, the condition of the feedstock and the output requirements and excluding building and infrastructure costs, is in the vicinity of Euros4,300,000 (approximately US$5.55 million at prevailing exchange rates). For a TCS-2, the comparable cost to the entrepreneur is in the vicinity of Euros 5,500,000 (approximately US$6.985 million at prevailing exchange rates). This represents a substantial investment for an entrepreneur and, without performance guarantees to substitute for the lack of a significant operating history, entrepreneurs or their financial backers have heretofore been unwilling to accept the risk of purchasing a new technology. Simpro has been able to obtain insurance backing to support their offer of limited performance guarantees, and such potential is expected to assist the marketing effort. Simpro is now offering limited Performance Guarantees.

During Fiscal 2004 and in the first quarter of Fiscal 2005, the Company and Simpro have responded to numerous requests for information. Out of these requests, several opportunities have presented themselves which merited the expenditure of considerable effort to close a Purchase and Sales Agreement. In addition to the Puerto Rican project, for which recent correspondence indicates that the Puerto Rican project continues to develop, Tirex and Simpro are actively pursuing opportunities in Mexico, Europe, Australia, Brazil, Malaysia, the Middle East and Botswana. All of these opportunities are

The finalizing of the License Agreement with Simpro means that the gross revenues from these sales will be recorded on Simpro's books, not in the books of Tirex. The amount remitted back to Tirex will take the form of a royalty and will be accounted for as such. Even if these sales would have been set up in such a way as to be recordable on the books of Tirex, generally accepted accounting principles in effect in the USA would have prevented the Company from recognizing the revenue as such until the systems would have been accepted by the customers. Given the time line required to manufacture, install and have accepted these systems, it is quite unlikely that these revenues would become recognizable during our fiscal year which will end June 30, 2005. By extension, the same principles would apply to the royalty to be received by Tirex. While the Company will benefit from the periodic cash inflows resulting from progress payments during the next approximately ten months, the royalty will, in fact, not have been earned until the systems are accepted by the customers.

In February of 2001, we concluded a private financing with an investor group. Under the terms of the Agreement, we had the contractual right to require the Investor to purchase up to US$5,000,000 of put notes. We drew down US$750,000 of this amount and used the proceeds of this financing toward legal and consulting fees due, normal operating expenses such as payroll, rent and taxes and the acquisition of equipment for our prototype TCS-1 Plant. In July of 2001, the Company entered into a technical default with respect to the Agreement by not having an SB-2 Registration Statement declared effective by the SEC. After several months of negotiations, the Company entered into a Settlement Agreement with the Investor Group which provided for a cash paydown of the amount owed, including interest and penalties over a period of approximately two years starting with the date the Settlement Agreement was signed, the right of the Investor Group to continue to be able to sell up to 600,000 collateral and Rule 144 shares per month and the issuance of three series of warrants, 500,000 each, exercisable at prices of one cent, five cents and ten cents over a three year period. This Settlement Agreement was announced in April of 2002, and details of the terms of the Agreement are filed as an Exhibit to this Report. The Company, in the absence of having completed its first sales of TCS Systems according to our expectations, was unable to generate the cash flow necessary to pay down the Convertible Note in accordance with the terms of the Settlement Agreement. Thus, the Company once again finds itself in a position of default. Numerous recourses are available to the holders of the Convertible Notes, but to date, these recourses have not been exercised. Such recourses can be exercised at any time and the fact that they have not been exercised so far does not preclude their being exercised now or in the future. The Company has kept the Convertible Note holders apprised of its efforts to sell TCS Systems and thus restart the repayments on the Convertible Notes.

Because of the lengthy delay preceding the commencement of commercial operations, we have historically had to cover our overhead costs from sources other than from commercial revenues. We expect that some portion of our future overhead costs, which may be quite significant, will continue to be covered from sources other than commercial revenues. Until December of 2001, our monthly operating costs were about US$100,000 per month. With the cessation of production activities and the scaling back of research and development expenditures starting in January of 2002, our monthly costs were reduced to approximately US$35,000 per month. Since March of 2003, our monthly our-of-pocket cash costs have been reduced to negligeable amounts, and thus our requirement to find financial resources to fund

While we have initiated marketing of TCS Systems and have in place a License Agreement, as of September 30, 2004, no unconditional sales orders for TCS Systems had been received and manufacturing of TCS Systems has not been initiated. We do anticipate that we will begin selling or licensing out the sale of TCS Systems and thus initiating the manufacturing of these systems on a commercial basis in the near future. Unless and until we successfully develop and commence TCS System manufacturing and sales operations on a full-scale commercial level, we will not generate significant revenues from operations. Accordingly, we would be obligated to attempt to seek noncommercial sources of revenues to support operations until TCS Systems sales and manufacturing operations would become a reality. In the event of such a circumstance, there can further be no assurance that such non-commercial revenue funding would be available at all or on terms acceptable to management. Except for activities related to the recycled crumb rubber industry, as noted above and in previous filings, we have never engaged in any other significant business activities.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of September 30, 2004, the Company had total assets of $233,297 as compared to $233,333 at September 30, 2003 reflecting a decrease of $36, and no change versus total assets as of the last fiscal year end, June 30, 2004.

As of September 30, 2004, the Company had total liabilities of $4,540,362 as compared to $3,916,298 at September 30, 2003, reflecting an increase of $624,064, and reflecting an increase of $212,651 versus total liabilities as of the last fiscal year end, June 30, 2004, which total amounted to $4,327,711. The increase in total liabilities from September 30, 2003 to September 30, 2004 is primarily attributable to an increase of $338,323 in Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities, by a decrease of $87,080 in Government Loans, by an increase of $376,245 in Convertible Loans and by a decrease of $3,425 in the Current Portion of Long-Term Debt. The increase in total liabilities from June 30, 2004 to September 30, 2004 is primarily attributable to an increase of $118,900 in Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities and to an increase of $93,750 in Convertible Loans.

Reflecting the foregoing, the financial statements indicate that as at September 30, 2004, the Company had a working capital deficit (current assets minus current liabilities) of $2,192,235 compared to a working capital deficit of $1,857,301 as at September 30, 2003, reflecting an increase of $334,934. The working capital deficit of $2,192,235 as at September 30, 2004 compares to a working capital deficit of $2,073,334 as at June 30, 2004, reflecting an increase of $118,901.

The financial statements which are included in this report reflect total operations and other expenses of $129,116 for the three month period ended September 30, 2004 versus $168,752 for the comparative three month period ended September 30, 2003, reflecting a decrease of $39,636. The Company has ceased Research and Development activities thereby resulting in a decrease in personnel expenses and other Research and Development expenses.

PART II: OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1:

Item 1 - Legal Proceedings

    We are presently a party in the following legal proceedings, the status of which has not changed since the Company filed its Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the second quarter of Fiscal 2003..

    No director, officer, or affiliate of the Company, or any associate of any of them, is a party to or has a material interest in any proceeding adverse to us.

Item 2: - Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds

None

Other than defaults previously reported on in prior periods, there were no other defaults upon senior securities.

During the three-month period ended September 30, 2004, there were no submissions of matters to a vote of Security Holders.

There have been no material changes in the way in which shareholders may nominate directors.

Exhibits

No exhibits or Reports on Form 8-K are filed with this report