Filed by Bowne Pure Compliance
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
| |
|
|
| þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008
OR
| |
|
|
| o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 1-13692
AMERIGAS PARTNERS, L.P.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charters)
| |
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
23-2787918
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
460 North Gulph Road, King of Prussia, PA 19406
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(610) 337-7000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large
accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
At July 31, 2008, there were 57,009,951 Common Units of AmeriGas Partners, L.P. outstanding.
AMERIGAS PARTNERS, L.P.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
i
AMERIGAS PARTNERS, L.P.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(unaudited)
(Thousands of dollars)
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
June 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
| |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
10,502 |
|
|
$ |
34,034 |
|
|
$ |
15,453 |
|
Accounts receivable (less allowances for doubtful accounts of $20,415,
$15,150 and $18,816, respectively) |
|
|
234,658 |
|
|
|
184,038 |
|
|
|
183,627 |
|
Accounts receivable — related parties |
|
|
4,686 |
|
|
|
3,684 |
|
|
|
3,461 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
125,421 |
|
|
|
124,840 |
|
|
|
96,791 |
|
Derivative financial instruments |
|
|
28,959 |
|
|
|
18,300 |
|
|
|
3,160 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
9,214 |
|
|
|
10,124 |
|
|
|
5,927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
413,440 |
|
|
|
375,020 |
|
|
|
308,419 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment (less accumulated depreciation and
amortization of $725,347, $679,081 and
$665,924, respectively) |
|
|
621,610 |
|
|
|
633,978 |
|
|
|
599,963 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
640,439 |
|
|
|
640,664 |
|
|
|
622,694 |
|
Intangible assets (less accumulated amortization of $32,764, $29,253 and
$28,112, respectively) |
|
|
27,742 |
|
|
|
29,809 |
|
|
|
26,141 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
15,804 |
|
|
|
17,313 |
|
|
|
18,864 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,719,035 |
|
|
$ |
1,696,784 |
|
|
$ |
1,576,081 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt |
|
$ |
71,219 |
|
|
$ |
1,925 |
|
|
$ |
1,508 |
|
Bank loans |
|
|
26,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Accounts payable — trade |
|
|
146,264 |
|
|
|
163,092 |
|
|
|
118,518 |
|
Accounts payable — related parties |
|
|
1,373 |
|
|
|
3,588 |
|
|
|
2,753 |
|
Customer deposits and advances |
|
|
57,008 |
|
|
|
99,137 |
|
|
|
42,534 |
|
Derivative financial instruments |
|
|
2,558 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
50 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
82,911 |
|
|
|
110,851 |
|
|
|
76,854 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
387,333 |
|
|
|
378,593 |
|
|
|
242,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
861,455 |
|
|
|
931,117 |
|
|
|
931,011 |
|
Other noncurrent liabilities |
|
|
64,245 |
|
|
|
64,460 |
|
|
|
67,054 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (note 3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interests |
|
|
12,076 |
|
|
|
11,386 |
|
|
|
11,377 |
|
Partners’ capital |
|
|
393,926 |
|
|
|
311,228 |
|
|
|
324,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and partners’
capital |
|
$ |
1,719,035 |
|
|
$ |
1,696,784 |
|
|
$ |
1,576,081 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
- 1 -
AMERIGAS PARTNERS, L.P.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(unaudited)
(Thousands of dollars, except per unit amounts)
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
| |
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
| |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
| |
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Propane |
|
$ |
488,482 |
|
|
$ |
388,964 |
|
|
$ |
2,148,458 |
|
|
$ |
1,723,661 |
|
Other |
|
|
46,647 |
|
|
|
44,953 |
|
|
|
141,495 |
|
|
|
136,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
535,129 |
|
|
|
433,917 |
|
|
|
2,289,953 |
|
|
|
1,860,316 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales — propane |
|
|
343,561 |
|
|
|
251,663 |
|
|
|
1,492,705 |
|
|
|
1,107,673 |
|
Cost of sales — other |
|
|
19,386 |
|
|
|
20,440 |
|
|
|
52,585 |
|
|
|
53,440 |
|
Operating and administrative expenses |
|
|
146,265 |
|
|
|
135,937 |
|
|
|
463,805 |
|
|
|
430,089 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
20,158 |
|
|
|
18,933 |
|
|
|
60,004 |
|
|
|
56,074 |
|
Other income, net |
|
|
(3,826 |
) |
|
|
(5,091 |
) |
|
|
(15,976 |
) |
|
|
(13,515 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
525,544 |
|
|
|
421,882 |
|
|
|
2,053,123 |
|
|
|
1,633,761 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
9,585 |
|
|
|
12,035 |
|
|
|
236,830 |
|
|
|
226,555 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(18,135 |
) |
|
|
(17,837 |
) |
|
|
(55,062 |
) |
|
|
(53,626 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes and minority interests |
|
|
(8,550 |
) |
|
|
(5,802 |
) |
|
|
181,768 |
|
|
|
172,929 |
|
Income tax (expense) benefit |
|
|
(176 |
) |
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
(953 |
) |
|
|
(863 |
) |
Minority interests |
|
|
(62 |
) |
|
|
(97 |
) |
|
|
(2,348 |
) |
|
|
(2,252 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(8,788 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,712 |
) |
|
$ |
178,467 |
|
|
$ |
169,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General partner’s interest in net income (loss) |
|
$ |
217 |
|
|
$ |
(14 |
) |
|
$ |
2,177 |
|
|
$ |
1,741 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Limited partners’ interest in net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(9,005 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,698 |
) |
|
$ |
176,290 |
|
|
$ |
168,073 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income per limited partner unit (note 1): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
(0.16 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.10 |
) |
|
$ |
2.79 |
|
|
$ |
2.72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
(0.16 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.10 |
) |
|
$ |
2.79 |
|
|
$ |
2.72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average limited partner units outstanding (thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
57,010 |
|
|
|
56,822 |
|
|
|
57,003 |
|
|
|
56,817 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
57,010 |
|
|
|
56,822 |
|
|
|
57,040 |
|
|
|
56,851 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
- 2 -
AMERIGAS PARTNERS, L.P.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited)
(Thousands of dollars)
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
| |
|
June 30, |
|
| |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
178,467 |
|
|
$ |
169,814 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
60,004 |
|
|
|
56,074 |
|
Provision for uncollectible accounts |
|
|
12,362 |
|
|
|
9,262 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
2,952 |
|
|
|
4,269 |
|
Net change in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(63,670 |
) |
|
|
(18,761 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
(395 |
) |
|
|
6,222 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
(19,042 |
) |
|
|
(26,525 |
) |
Other current
assets and
liabilities |
|
|
(67,697 |
) |
|
|
(83,321 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
102,981 |
|
|
|
117,034 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditures for property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(48,168 |
) |
|
|
(58,252 |
) |
Proceeds from disposals of assets |
|
|
7,154 |
|
|
|
3,297 |
|
Acquisitions of businesses, net of cash acquired |
|
|
(1,533 |
) |
|
|
(27,783 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used by investing activities |
|
|
(42,547 |
) |
|
|
(82,738 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions |
|
|
(107,496 |
) |
|
|
(101,626 |
) |
Minority interest activity |
|
|
(1,759 |
) |
|
|
(1,661 |
) |
Increase in bank loans |
|
|
26,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Issuance of long-term debt |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
70 |
|
Repayment of long-term debt |
|
|
(1,485 |
) |
|
|
(1,223 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of Common Units |
|
|
766 |
|
|
|
814 |
|
Capital contributions from General Partner |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used by financing activities |
|
|
(83,966 |
) |
|
|
(103,618 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents decrease |
|
$ |
(23,532 |
) |
|
$ |
(69,322 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period |
|
$ |
10,502 |
|
|
$ |
15,453 |
|
Beginning of period |
|
|
34,034 |
|
|
|
84,775 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease |
|
$ |
(23,532 |
) |
|
$ |
(69,322 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
- 3 -
AMERIGAS PARTNERS, L.P.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS’ CAPITAL
(unaudited)
(Thousands of dollars, except unit data)
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
other |
|
|
Total |
|
| |
|
Number of |
|
|
Common |
|
|
General |
|
|
comprehensive |
|
|
partners’ |
|
| |
|
Common Units |
|
|
unitholders |
|
|
partner |
|
|
income (loss) |
|
|
capital |
|
Balance September 30, 2007 |
|
|
56,988,702 |
|
|
$ |
293,245 |
|
|
$ |
2,952 |
|
|
$ |
15,031 |
|
|
$ |
311,228 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
176,290 |
|
|
|
2,177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
178,467 |
|
Net gains on derivative instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,820 |
|
|
|
60,820 |
|
Reclassification of net gains on
derivative instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(50,466 |
) |
|
|
(50,466 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
176,290 |
|
|
|
2,177 |
|
|
|
10,354 |
|
|
|
188,821 |
|
Distributions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(106,029 |
) |
|
|
(1,467 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(107,496 |
) |
Unit-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
599 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
599 |
|
Common Units issued in connection
with incentive compensation plans |
|
|
21,249 |
|
|
|
766 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
774 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance June 30, 2008 |
|
|
57,009,951 |
|
|
$ |
364,871 |
|
|
$ |
3,670 |
|
|
$ |
25,385 |
|
|
$ |
393,926 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
- 4 -
AMERIGAS PARTNERS, L.P.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
(Thousands of dollars, except per unit)
| 1. |
|
Basis of Presentation |
| |
| |
|
The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of AmeriGas Partners,
L.P. (“AmeriGas Partners”) and its principal operating subsidiaries AmeriGas Propane, L.P.
(“AmeriGas OLP”) and AmeriGas OLP’s subsidiary, AmeriGas Eagle Propane, L.P. (“Eagle OLP”).
AmeriGas Partners, AmeriGas OLP and Eagle OLP are Delaware limited partnerships. AmeriGas
OLP and Eagle OLP are collectively referred to herein as “the Operating Partnerships,” and
AmeriGas Partners, the Operating Partnerships and all of their subsidiaries are collectively
referred to herein as “the Partnership” or “we.” We eliminate all significant intercompany
accounts and transactions when we consolidate. We account for AmeriGas Propane, Inc.’s (the
“General Partner’s”) 1.01% interest in AmeriGas OLP and an unrelated third party’s
approximate 0.1% limited partner interest in Eagle OLP as minority interests in the condensed
consolidated financial statements. AmeriGas Propane, Inc. is an indirect wholly owned
subsidiary of UGI Corporation (“UGI”). |
| |
| |
|
AmeriGas Finance Corp., AmeriGas Eagle Finance Corp. and AP Eagle Finance Corp. are
wholly owned finance subsidiaries of AmeriGas Partners. Their sole purpose is to serve as
co-obligors for debt securities issued by AmeriGas Partners, L.P. |
| |
| |
|
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements are unaudited and have been
prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission (“SEC”). They include all adjustments which we consider necessary for a fair
statement of the results for the interim periods presented. Such adjustments consisted only
of normal recurring items unless otherwise disclosed. The September 30, 2007 condensed
consolidated balance sheet data were derived from audited financial statements, but do not
include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the
financial statements and related notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended September 30, 2007. Weather significantly impacts demand for propane and
profitability because many customers use propane for heating purposes. Due to the seasonal
nature of the Partnership’s propane business, the results of operations for interim periods
are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for a full year. |
| |
| |
|
Allocation of Net Income (Loss). Net income (loss) for partners’ capital and statement of
operations presentation purposes is allocated to the General Partner and the limited partners
in accordance with their respective ownership percentages after giving effect to amounts
distributed to the General Partner in excess of its 1% general partner interest in AmeriGas
Partners, if any, in accordance with the Third Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited
Partnership of AmeriGas Partners as amended by Amendment No. 1. |
- 5 -
AMERIGAS PARTNERS, L.P.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
(Thousands of dollars, except per unit)
Net Income (Loss) Per Unit. Income (loss) per limited partner unit is computed in accordance
with Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 03-6, “Participating Securities and the
Two-Class Method under FASB Statement No. 128” (“EITF 03-6”), by dividing the limited
partners’ interest in net income (loss) by the weighted average number
of limited partner units outstanding. The two class method requires that income per limited
partner unit be calculated as if all earnings for the period were distributed and requires a
separate calculation for each quarter and year-to-date period. Thus, in periods when our net
income exceeds our aggregate distributions paid and undistributed earnings are above certain
levels, the calculation according to the two-class method results in an increased allocation
of undistributed earnings to the General Partner. Due to the seasonality of the propane
business, EITF 03-6 will typically impact net income per limited partner unit for our first
three fiscal quarters. Theoretical distributions of net income in accordance with EITF 03-6
for the nine months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 resulted in an increased allocation of net
income to the General Partner in the computation of income per limited partner unit which had
the effect of decreasing earnings per limited partner unit by $0.30 and $0.24, respectively.
There was no dilutive effect of EITF 03-6 on net loss per limited partner unit for the three
months ended June 30, 2008 or 2007.
Potentially dilutive Common Units included in the diluted limited partner units outstanding
computation reflect the effects of restricted Common Unit awards granted under the General
Partner’s incentive compensation plans.
Comprehensive Income (Loss). The following table presents the components of comprehensive
income (loss) for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
| |
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
| |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(8,788 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,712 |
) |
|
$ |
178,467 |
|
|
$ |
169,814 |
|
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
26,506 |
|
|
|
4,412 |
|
|
|
10,354 |
|
|
|
33,537 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
17,718 |
|
|
$ |
(1,300 |
) |
|
$ |
188,821 |
|
|
$ |
203,351 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income is principally the result of changes in the fair value of propane
commodity derivative instruments and interest rate protection agreements, net of
reclassifications of net gains and losses to net income.
Reclassifications. We have reclassified certain prior-year balances to conform to the
current period presentation.
- 6 -
AMERIGAS PARTNERS, L.P.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
(Thousands of dollars, except per unit)
Use of Estimates. We make estimates and assumptions when preparing financial statements in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities,
revenues and expenses, as well as the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities.
Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements. In May 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards
Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 162, “The
Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles” (“SFAS 162”). SFAS 162 clarifies the
sources of accounting principles and the framework to be followed in preparing financial
statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States
of America. We do not expect this standard to impact our financial statements.
In April 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) No. SFAS 142-3,
“Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets” (“FSP SFAS 142-3”). FSP SFAS 142-3
amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions
used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142,
“Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (“SFAS 142”). The intent of FSP SFAS 142-3 is to
improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS
142 and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under
SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), “Business Combinations” (“SFAS 141R”) and other applicable
accounting literature. FSP SFAS 142-3 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2008 and must be applied prospectively to intangible
assets acquired after the effective date. We are currently evaluating the provisions of FSP
SFAS 142-3.
In March 2008, the FASB ratified the consensus reached in EITF 07-4, “Application of the
Two-Class Method under FAS 128 to Master Limited Partnerships” (“EITF 07-4”). EITF 07-4
addresses the application of the two-class method for master limited partnerships when
incentive distribution rights are present and entitle the holder of such rights to a portion
of the distributions. EITF 07-4 states that when earnings exceed distributions, the
computation of earnings per unit should be based on the terms of the partnership agreement.
Accordingly, any contractual limitations on the distributions to incentive distribution
rights holders would need to be determined for each reporting period. If distributions are
contractually limited to the holder of the incentive distribution rights holders’ share of
currently designated available cash as defined in the partnership agreement, undistributed
earnings in excess of available cash should not be allocated with respect to the incentive
distribution rights. EITF 07-4 is effective for fiscal periods that begin after December 15,
2008, and would be accounted for as a change in accounting principle and applied
retrospectively. Early adoption of EITF 07-4 is not permitted. We are currently evaluating
the impact of EITF 07-4 on our income (loss) per limited partner unit calculation.
- 7 -
AMERIGAS PARTNERS, L.P.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
(Thousands of dollars, except per unit)
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161,
“Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“SFAS 161”). SFAS 161
requires enhanced disclosures in the following areas: (1) qualitative disclosures about
the overall objectives and strategies for using derivatives; (2) quantitative disclosures on
the fair value of the derivative instruments and related gains and losses in a tabular
format; and (3) credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative instruments. SFAS 161
is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. We are
currently evaluating the impact of the provisions of SFAS 161 on our future disclosures.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 141R. SFAS 141R applies to all transactions or other
events in which an entity obtains control of one or more businesses. SFAS 141R establishes,
among other things, principles and requirements for how the acquirer (1) recognizes and
measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities
assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree; (2) recognizes and measures the
goodwill acquired in a business combination or gain from a bargain purchase; and (3)
determines what information with respect to a business combination should be disclosed. SFAS
141R applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or
after the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Among the
more significant changes in accounting for acquisitions are (1) transaction costs will
generally be expensed (rather than being included as costs of the acquisition); (2)
contingencies, including contingent consideration, will generally be recorded at fair value
with subsequent adjustments recognized in operations (rather than as adjustments to the
purchase price) and (3) decreases in valuation allowances on acquired deferred tax assets
will be recognized in operations (rather than decreases in goodwill). Generally, the effects
of SFAS 141R will depend on future acquisitions.
Also in December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements — an amendment of ARB No. 51” (“SFAS 160”). SFAS 160
establishes accounting and reporting standards that require, among other things, (1)
ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent be presented within
equity, but separate from the parent’s equity; (2) earnings attributable to minority
interests be included in net earnings, although such earnings will continue to be deducted to
measure earnings per unit; (3) changes in a parent’s ownership interest while retaining
control be accounted for as equity transactions; and (4) any retained noncontrolling equity
investments in a former subsidiary be initially measured at fair value. SFAS 160 is effective
for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after
December 15, 2008. We are currently evaluating the impact of the provisions of SFAS 160.
- 8 -
AMERIGAS PARTNERS, L.P.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
(Thousands of dollars, except per unit)
In April 2007, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FIN 39-1, “Amendment of FASB
Interpretation No. 39” (“FSP 39-1”). FSP 39-1 permits companies to offset fair value amounts
recognized for the right to reclaim cash collateral (a receivable) or the obligation to
return cash collateral (a payable) against fair value amounts recognized for derivative
instruments executed with the same counterparty under a master netting agreement. In
addition, upon the adoption, companies are permitted to change their accounting policy to
offset or not offset fair value amounts recognized for derivative instruments under master
netting arrangements. FSP 39-1 requires retrospective application for all periods presented.
FSP 39-1 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. FSP 39-1 is not
expected to have a material effect on our earnings or financial position and will have no
effect on our future cash flows
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”). SFAS
157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally
accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. In
February 2008, the FASB issued two final staff positions (“FSPs”) amending SFAS 157. FSP
SFAS 157-1 amends SFAS 157 to exclude SFAS No. 13, “Accounting for Leases,” and its related
interpretive accounting pronouncements that address leasing transactions. FSP SFAS 157-2
delays the effective date of SFAS 157 until fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008
for non-financial assets and liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in
the financial statements on a non-recurring basis. The standard, as amended, applies
prospectively to new fair value measurements for the Partnership as follows: on October 1,
2008 the standard will apply to our measurements of fair values of financial instruments and
recurring fair value measurements of non-financial assets and liabilities; on October 1,
2009, the standard will apply to all remaining fair value measurements including nonrecurring
measurements of non-financial assets and liabilities such as measurement of potential
impairments of goodwill, other intangible assets and other long-lived assets. It will also
apply to non-financial assets acquired and liabilities assumed that are initially measured at
fair value in a business combination but that are not subject to remeasurement at fair value
in subsequent periods. SFAS 157 is not expected to have a material effect on our earnings or
financial position and will have no effect on our future cash flows.
| 2. |
|
Related Party Transactions |
| |
| |
|
Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement and a Management Services Agreement among AmeriGas
Eagle Holdings, Inc., the general partner of Eagle OLP, and the General Partner, the General
Partner is entitled to reimbursement for all direct and indirect expenses incurred or
payments it makes on behalf of the Partnership. These costs, which totaled $81,522 and
$263,754 during the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008, respectively, and $79,697 and
$254,953 during the three and nine months ended June 30, 2007, respectively, include employee
compensation and benefit expenses of employees of the General Partner and general and
administrative expenses. |
- 9 -
AMERIGAS PARTNERS, L.P.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
(Thousands of dollars, except per unit)
UGI provides certain financial and administrative services to the General Partner. UGI bills
the General Partner for all direct and indirect corporate expenses incurred in connection
with providing these services and the General Partner is reimbursed by the Partnership for
these expenses. Such corporate expenses totaled $2,275 and $9,062 during the three and nine
months ended June 30, 2008, respectively, and $2,244 and $8,393 during the three and nine
months ended June 30, 2007, respectively. In addition, UGI and certain of its subsidiaries
provide office space, medical stop loss coverage and automobile liability insurance to the
Partnership. These costs totaled $675 and $1,782 during the three and nine months ended June
30, 2008, respectively, and $562 and $1,858 during the three and nine months ended June 30,
2007, respectively.
AmeriGas OLP purchases propane from UGI Energy Services, Inc. and subsidiaries (“Energy
Services”), which is owned by an affiliate of UGI. Purchases of propane by AmeriGas OLP from
Energy Services totaled $6,396 and $40,932 during the three and nine months ended June 30,
2008, respectively, and $4,428 and $28,765 during the three and nine months ended June 30,
2007, respectively. Amounts due to Energy Services totaled $1,002, $3,507 and $1,807 at June
30, 2008, September 30, 2007 and June 30, 2007, respectively, and are reflected in accounts
payable — related parties in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
| 3. |
|
Commitments and Contingencies |
| |
| |
|
On August 21, 2001, AmeriGas Partners, through AmeriGas OLP, acquired the propane
distribution businesses of Columbia Energy Group (the “2001 Acquisition”) pursuant to the
terms of a purchase agreement (the “2001 Acquisition Agreement”) by and among Columbia Energy
Group (“CEG”), Columbia Propane Corporation (“Columbia Propane”), Columbia Propane, L.P.
(“CPLP”), CP Holdings, Inc. (“CPH,” and together with Columbia Propane and CPLP, the “Company
Parties”), AmeriGas Partners, AmeriGas OLP and the General Partner (together with AmeriGas
Partners and AmeriGas OLP, the “Buyer Parties”). As a result of the 2001 Acquisition,
AmeriGas OLP acquired all of the stock of Columbia Propane and CPH and substantially all of
the partnership interests of CPLP. Under the terms of an earlier acquisition agreement (the
“1999 Acquisition Agreement”), the Company Parties agreed to indemnify the former general
partners of National Propane Partners, L.P. (a predecessor company of the Columbia Propane
businesses) and an affiliate (collectively, “National General Partners”) against certain
income tax and other losses that they may sustain as a result of the 1999 acquisition by CPLP
of National Propane Partners, L.P. (the “1999 Acquisition”) or the operation of the business
after the 1999 Acquisition (“National Claims”). At June 30, 2008, the potential amount
payable under this indemnity by the Company Parties was approximately $58,000. These
indemnity obligations will expire on the
date that CPH acquires the remaining outstanding partnership interest of CPLP, which is
expected to occur on or after July 19, 2009. Under the terms of the 2001 Acquisition
Agreement, CEG agreed to indemnify the Buyer Parties and the Company Parties against any
losses that they sustain under the 1999 Acquisition Agreement and related agreements
(“Losses”), including National Claims, to the extent such claims are based on acts or
omissions of CEG or the Company Parties prior to the 2001 Acquisition. The Buyer Parties
agreed to indemnify CEG against Losses, including National Claims, to the extent such claims
are based on acts or omissions of the Buyer Parties or the Company Parties after the 2001
Acquisition. CEG and the Buyer Parties have agreed to apportion certain losses resulting from
National Claims to the extent such losses result from the 2001 Acquisition itself. |
- 10 -
AMERIGAS PARTNERS, L.P.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
(Thousands of dollars, except per unit)
Samuel and Brenda Swiger and their son (the “Swigers”) sustained personal injuries and
property damage as a result of a fire that occurred when propane that leaked from an
underground line ignited. In July 1998, the Swigers filed a class action lawsuit against
AmeriGas Propane, L.P. (named incorrectly as “UGI/AmeriGas, Inc.”), in the Circuit Court of
Monongalia County, West Virginia, in which they sought to recover an unspecified amount of
compensatory and punitive damages and attorney’s fees, for themselves and on behalf of
persons in West Virginia for whom the defendants had installed propane gas lines, resulting
from the defendants’ alleged failure to install underground propane lines at depths required
by applicable safety standards. In 2003, we settled the individual personal injury and
property damage claims of the Swigers. In 2004, the court granted the plaintiffs’ motion to
include customers acquired from Columbia Propane in August 2001 as additional potential class
members and the plaintiffs amended their complaint to name additional parties pursuant to
such ruling. Subsequently, in March 2005, we filed a cross-claim against CEG, former owner of
Columbia Propane, seeking indemnification for conduct undertaken by Columbia Propane prior to
our acquisition. Class counsel has indicated that the class is seeking compensatory damages
in excess of $12,000 plus punitive damages, civil penalties and attorneys’ fees. We believe
we have good defenses to the claims of the class members and intend to defend against the
remaining claims in this lawsuit.
By letter dated March 6, 2008, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
(“DEC”) notified AmeriGas OLP that DEC had placed property owned by the Partnership in
Saranac Lake, New York on its Registry of Inactive Hazardous Waste Disposal Sites. A site
characterization study performed by DEC disclosed contamination related to former
manufactured gas plant operations on the site. DEC has classified the site as a significant
threat to public health or environment with further action required. The Partnership is
researching the history of the site and is investigating DEC’s findings. The General Partner
has reviewed the preliminary site characterization study prepared by the DEC and is in the
early stages of investigating the extent of contamination and the possible existence of other potentially
responsible parties. Due to the early stage of such investigation, an estimate of possible
loss cannot be made. It is reasonably possible that such estimate of possible loss could be
material to the Partnership’s results of operations.
- 11 -
AMERIGAS PARTNERS, L.P.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
(Thousands of dollars, except per unit)
We also have other contingent liabilities, pending claims and legal actions arising in the
normal course of our business. We cannot predict with certainty the final results of these
and the aforementioned matters. However, it is reasonably possible that some of them could be
resolved unfavorably to us and result in losses in excess of recorded amounts. We are unable
to estimate any such possible excess losses. Although management currently believes, after
consultation with counsel, that damages or settlements, if any, recovered by the plaintiffs
in such claims or actions will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position,
damages or settlements could be material to our operating results or cash flows in future
periods depending on the nature and timing of future developments with respect to these
matters and the amounts of future operating results and cash flows.
| 4. |
|
Pending Sale of California Storage Facility |
| |
| |
|
On July 30, 2008, AmeriGas OLP signed a definitive agreement to sell its 600,000 barrel
refrigerated, above-ground storage facility located on leased property in California for
approximately $43,000 in cash. The transaction is subject to customary closing conditions and
is expected to close approximately sixty to ninety days after July 30, 2008. Upon closing, we
expect to record a gain of approximately $39,000 to $41,000 associated with this transaction. |
- 12 -
AMERIGAS PARTNERS, L.P.
|
|
|
| ITEM 2. |
|
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Information contained in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations may contain forward-looking statements. Such statements use forward-looking
words such as “believe,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “continue,” “estimate,” “expect,” “may,” “will,” or
other similar words. These statements discuss plans, strategies, events or developments that we
expect or anticipate will or may occur in the future.
A forward-looking statement may include a statement of the assumptions or bases underlying the
forward-looking statement. We believe that we have chosen these assumptions or bases in good faith
and that they are reasonable. However, we caution you that actual results almost always vary from
assumed facts or bases, and the differences between actual results and assumed facts or bases can
be material, depending on the circumstances. When considering forward-looking statements, you
should keep in mind the following important factors which could affect our future results and could
cause those results to differ materially from those expressed in our forward-looking statements:
(1) adverse weather conditions resulting in reduced demand; (2) cost volatility and availability of
propane, and the capacity to transport propane to our market areas; (3) the availability of, and
our ability to consummate, acquisition or combination opportunities; (4) successful integration and
future performance of acquired assets or businesses; (5) changes in laws and regulations, including
safety, tax and accounting matters; (6) competitive pressures from the same and alternative energy
sources; (7) failure to acquire new customers thereby reducing or limiting any increase in
revenues; (8) liability for environmental claims;
(9) increased customer conservation measures due to high energy prices and improvements in energy
efficiency and technology resulting in reduced demand; (10) adverse labor relations; (11) large
customer, counterparty or supplier defaults; (12) liability in excess of insurance coverage for
personal injury and property damage arising from explosions and other catastrophic events,
including acts of terrorism, resulting from operating hazards and risks incidental to transporting,
storing and distributing propane, butane and ammonia; (13) political, regulatory and economic
conditions in the United States and foreign countries; (14) reduced access to capital markets and
interest rate fluctuations; and (15) the impact of pending and future legal proceedings.
These factors are not necessarily all of the important factors that could cause actual results to
differ materially from those expressed in any of our forward-looking statements. Other unknown or
unpredictable factors could also have material adverse effects on future results. We undertake no
obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statement whether as a result of new information
or future events except as required by the federal securities laws.
- 13 -
AMERIGAS PARTNERS, L.P.
ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following analyses compare the Partnership’s results of operations for (1) the three months
ended June 30, 2008 (“2008 three-month period”) with the three months ended June 30, 2007 (“2007
three-month period”) and (2) the nine months ended June 30, 2008 (“2008 nine-month period”) with
the nine months ended June 30, 2007 (“2007 nine-month period”).
Executive Overview
Weather significantly impacts demand for propane and profitability because many customers use
propane for heating purposes particularly during the first half of our fiscal year. As a result,
our earnings are generally higher in the first and second fiscal quarters. Due to the seasonal
nature of the Partnership’s propane business, the results of operations for interim periods are not
necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for a full year. In addition, high and
volatile commodity prices like those experienced over the last several years and weak economic
conditions can result in lower customer consumption and increased competitive pressures in certain
markets.
The Partnership reported a net loss of $8.8 million for the 2008 three-month period compared with a
net loss of $5.7 million for the prior-year three-month period. Temperatures based upon heating
degree days during the 2008 three-month period were 1.8% colder than normal and 7.0% colder than
the prior year. Notwithstanding the volume benefits from acquisitions made during the twelve months
ended September 30, 2007 (“fiscal 2007”) and the cooler spring weather, retail gallons sold were
slightly lower in the 2008 three-month period due to, among other things, customer conservation,
resulting from record high propane commodity costs, and the impact of a sluggish economy on
commercial volumes. Although retail volumes sold were slightly lower than in the prior year, the
Partnership’s operating results
benefited from higher total margin in the 2008 three-month period due to higher average retail unit
margins.
The Partnership reported net income of $178.5 million for the 2008 nine-month period compared with
net income of $169.8 million for the prior-year nine-month period. Temperatures during the 2008
nine-month period were 2.7% warmer than normal but slightly colder than the prior-year nine-month
period. Similar to the 2008 three-month period, customer conservation resulting from, among other
things, significant increases in propane product costs and general economic conditions resulted in
slightly lower retail gallons sold notwithstanding the volume benefits of acquisitions. Although
retail volumes sold were slightly lower than in the prior year, operating results benefited from
higher total margin in the 2008 nine-month period due to higher average retail unit margins.
- 14 -
AMERIGAS PARTNERS, L.P.
2008 three-month period compared with 2007 three-month period
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
| Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
| (millions of dollars) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Gallons sold (millions): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail |
|
|
180.7 |
|
|
|
182.1 |
|
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
(0.8 |
)% |
Wholesale |
|
|
18.0 |
|
|
|
18.7 |
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
(3.7 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
198.7 |
|
|
|
200.8 |
|
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
|
|
(1.0 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail propane |
|
$ |
456.8 |
|
|
$ |
366.5 |
|
|
$ |
90.3 |
|
|
|
24.6 |
% |
Wholesale propane |
|
|
31.7 |
|
|
|
22.5 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
40.9 |
% |
Other |
|
|
46.6 |
|
|
|
44.9 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
535.1 |
|
|
$ |
433.9 |
|
|
$ |
101.2 |
|
|
|
23.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total margin (a) |
|
$ |
172.2 |
|
|
$ |
161.8 |
|
|
$ |
10.4 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
% |
EBITDA (b) |
|
$ |
29.7 |
|
|
$ |
30.9 |
|
|
$ |
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
(3.9 |
)% |
Operating income |
|
$ |
9.6 |
|
|
$ |
12.0 |
|
|
$ |
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
(20.0 |
)% |
Net loss |
|
$ |
(8.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(5.7 |
) |
|
$ |
(3.1 |
) |
|
|
54.4 |
% |
Heating degree days — % colder (warmer) than normal (c) |
|
|
1.8 |
% |
|
|
(6.1 |
)% |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
| |
|
|
| (a) |
|
Total margin represents total revenues less cost of sales — propane and cost of sales -
other. |
| |
| (b) |
|
Earnings before interest expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”)
should not be considered as an alternative to net income (as an indicator of operating
performance) and is not a measure of performance or financial condition under accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). Management believes
EBITDA is a meaningful non-GAAP financial measure used by investors to (1) compare the
Partnership’s operating performance with other companies within the propane industry and (2)
assess its ability to meet loan covenants. The Partnership’s definition of EBITDA may be
different from that used by other companies. Management uses EBITDA to compare year-over-year
profitability of the business without regard to capital structure as well as to compare the
relative performance of the Partnership to that of other master limited partnerships without
regard to their financing methods, capital structure, income taxes or historical cost basis.
In view of the omission of interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization from EBITDA,
management also assesses the profitability of the business by comparing net income for the
relevant years. Management also uses EBITDA to assess the Partnership’s profitability because
its parent, UGI Corporation, uses the Partnership’s EBITDA to assess the profitability of the
Partnership. UGI Corporation discloses the Partnership’s EBITDA as the profitability measure
to comply with the requirement in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 131,
“Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information,” to provide
profitability information about its domestic propane segment. |
| |
| |
|
The following table includes reconciliations of net income to EBITDA for the periods presented: |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
| |
|
June 30, |
|
| |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
| |
Net loss |
|
$ |
(8.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(5.7 |
) |
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
18.1 |
|
|
|
17.8 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
19.0 |
|
|
|
18.0 |
|
Amortization |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA |
|
$ |
29.7 |
|
|
$ |
30.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| (c) |
|
Deviation from average heating degree days for the 30-year period 1971-2000 based upon
national weather statistics provided by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
(“NOAA”) for 335 airports in the United States, excluding Alaska. |
- 15 -
AMERIGAS PARTNERS, L.P.
Based upon heating degree-day data, average temperatures in our service territories were 1.8%
colder than normal during the 2008 three-month period compared with temperatures in the prior-year
period that were 6.1% warmer than normal. Notwithstanding the cooler 2008 three-month period
weather and the full period benefits of acquisitions made in fiscal 2007, retail gallons sold were
about equal to the prior-year period reflecting, among other things, customer conservation, in
response to increasing propane product costs, and a weak economy. The average wholesale propane
cost at Mont Belvieu, Texas for the 2008 three-month period increased approximately 50% over such
average cost for the same period last year.
Retail propane revenues increased $90.3 million reflecting a $92.9 million increase due to the
higher average selling prices partially offset by a $2.6 million decrease as a result of the lower
retail volumes sold. Wholesale propane revenues increased $9.2 million reflecting a $10.0 million
increase from higher wholesale selling prices partially offset by a $0.8 million decrease from
lower wholesale volumes sold. Total cost of sales increased $90.8 million to $362.9 million
reflecting the effects of the higher propane product costs.
Total margin was $10.4 million greater in the 2008 three-month period principally reflecting higher
average propane margins per retail gallon sold and, to a lesser extent, higher fee and service
income.
Partnership EBITDA during the 2008 three-month period was $29.7 million, slightly lower than the
prior-year period. The previously mentioned increase in total margin was more than offset by a
$10.3 million increase in operating and administrative expenses and, to a lesser extent, lower
other income. Operating and administrative expenses increased due in large part to expenses
associated with acquisitions, increased vehicle fuel and maintenance expenses and the effects of a
greater reduction in general insurance liabilities recorded in the prior year.
The Partnership’s operating income decreased $2.4 million reflecting the $1.2 million reduction in
EBITDA and higher depreciation and amortization expense associated with acquisitions and plant and
equipment expenditures made since the prior year.
- 16 -
AMERIGAS PARTNERS, L.P.
2008 nine-month period compared with 2007 nine-month period
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
| Nine Months Ended June 30, |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
| (millions of dollars) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Gallons sold (millions): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail |
|
|
828.2 |
|
|
|
835.1 |
|
|
|
(6.9 |
) |
|
|
(0.8 |
)% |
Wholesale |
|
|
90.4 |
|
|
|
95.7 |
|
|
|
(5.3 |
) |
|
|
(5.5 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
918.6 |
|
|
|
930.8 |
|
|
|
(12.2 |
) |
|
|
(1.3 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail propane |
|
$ |
2,000.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,614.3 |
|
|
$ |
385.7 |
|
|
|
23.9 |
% |
Wholesale propane |
|
|
148.5 |
|
|
|
109.4 |
|
|
|
39.1 |
|
|
|
35.7 |
% |
Other |
|
|
141.5 |
|
|
|
136.6 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,290.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,860.3 |
|
|
$ |
429.7 |
|
|
|
23.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total margin (a) |
|
$ |
744.7 |
|
|
$ |
699.2 |
|
|
$ |
45.5 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
% |
EBITDA (b) |
|
$ |
294.5 |
|
|
$ |
280.4 |
|
|
$ |
14.1 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
Operating income |
|
$ |
236.8 |
|
|
$ |
226.6 |
|
|
$ |
10.2 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
% |
Net income |
|
$ |
178.5 |
|
|
$ |
169.8 |
|
|
$ |
8.7 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
% |
Heating degree days — % warmer than normal (c) |
|
|
2.7 |
% |
|
|
5.8 |
% |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
| |
|
|
| (a) |
|
Total margin represents total revenues less cost of sales — propane and cost of sales -
other. |
| |
| (b) |
|
Earnings before interest expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”)
should not be considered as an alternative to net income (as an indicator of operating
performance) and is not a measure of performance or financial condition under accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). Management believes
EBITDA is a meaningful non-GAAP financial measure used by investors to (1) compare the
Partnership’s operating performance with other companies within the propane industry and (2)
assess its ability to meet loan covenants. The Partnership’s definition of EBITDA may be
different from that used by other companies. Management uses EBITDA to compare year-over-year
profitability of the business without regard to capital structure as well as to compare the
relative performance of the Partnership to that of other master limited partnerships without
regard to their financing methods, capital structure, income taxes or historical cost basis.
In view of the omission of interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization from EBITDA,
management also assesses the profitability of the business by comparing net income for the
relevant years. Management also uses EBITDA to assess the Partnership’s profitability because
its parent, UGI Corporation, uses the Partnership’s EBITDA to assess the profitability of the
Partnership. UGI Corporation discloses the Partnership’s EBITDA as the profitability measure
to comply with the requirement in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 131,
“Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information,” to provide
profitability information about its domestic propane segment. |
| |
| |
|
The following table includes reconciliations of net income to EBITDA for the periods presented: |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
| |
|
June 30, |
|
| |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
| |
Net income |
|
$ |
178.5 |
|
|
$ |
169.8 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
55.1 |
|
|
|
53.6 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
56.5 |
|
|
|
53.2 |
|
Amortization |
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA |
|
$ |
294.5 |
|
|
$ |
280.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| (c) |
|
Deviation from average heating degree days for the 30-year period 1971-2000 based upon
national weather statistics provided by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
(“NOAA”) for 335 airports in the United States, excluding Alaska. |
- 17 -
AMERIGAS PARTNERS, L.P.
Based upon heating degree-day data, average temperatures in our service territories were 2.7%
warmer than normal compared with temperatures in the prior-year period that were 5.8% warmer than
normal. Notwithstanding the slightly colder 2008 nine-month period weather and the benefits of
acquisitions made in fiscal 2007, retail gallons sold were slightly lower reflecting, among other
things, customer conservation, in response to increasing propane product costs, and a weak economy.
The average wholesale propane cost at Mont Belvieu, Texas during the 2008 nine-month period
increased more than 50% over the average cost during the same period last year.
Retail propane revenues increased $385.7 million reflecting a $399.0 million increase due to the
higher average selling prices partially offset by a $13.3 million decrease as a result of the lower
retail volumes sold. Wholesale propane revenues increased $39.1 million reflecting a $45.2 million
increase from higher wholesale selling prices partially offset by a $6.1 million decrease from
lower wholesale volumes sold. Total cost of sales increased $384.2 million to $1,545.3 million in
the 2008 nine-month period reflecting higher propane product costs.
Total margin was $45.5 million greater in the 2008 nine-month period principally reflecting higher
average propane margins per retail gallon sold and, to a much lesser extent, higher fee income.
Partnership EBITDA during the 2008 nine-month period was $294.5 million, $14.1 million higher than
the prior-year period. The previously mentioned increase in total margin as well as a $2.5 million
increase in other income was partially offset by a $33.7 million increase in operating and
administrative expenses as a result of expenses associated with acquisitions, increased vehicle
fuel and maintenance expenses, greater general insurance expense and, to a lesser extent, higher
uncollectible accounts expenses attributable to the higher revenues.
The Partnership’s operating income increased $10.2 million reflecting the previously mentioned
greater EBITDA reduced by higher depreciation and amortization expense from acquisitions and plant
and equipment expenditures made since the prior year.
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY
Financial Condition
The Partnership’s total debt outstanding at June 30, 2008 was $958.7 million (including current
maturities of long-term debt of $71.2 million) compared to total debt outstanding at September 30,
2007 of $933.0 million (including current maturities of $1.9 million). Total debt outstanding at
June 30, 2008 includes long-term debt comprising $779.8 million of AmeriGas Partners’ Senior Notes,
$150.3 million of AmeriGas OLP First Mortgage Notes and $2.6 million of other long-term debt. Total
debt outstanding at June 30, 2008 also includes $26 million outstanding under AmeriGas OLP’s Credit
Agreement.
- 18 -
AMERIGAS PARTNERS, L.P.
AmeriGas OLP’s Credit Agreement is currently scheduled to expire in October 2011 and consists of
(1) a $125 million Revolving Credit Facility and (2) a $75 million Acquisition Facility. The
Revolving Credit Facility may be used for working capital and general purposes of AmeriGas OLP.
The Acquisition Facility provides AmeriGas OLP with the ability to borrow up to $75 million to
finance the purchase of propane businesses or propane business assets or, to the extent it is not
so used, for working capital and general purposes. AmeriGas OLP’s short-term borrowing needs are
seasonal and are typically greatest during the fall and winter heating-season months due to the
need to fund higher levels of working capital. At June 30, 2008, there were $26 million of
borrowings outstanding under the Credit Agreement. Issued and outstanding letters of credit under
the Revolving Credit Facility, which reduce the amount available for borrowings, totaled $44.4
million at June 30, 2008. The average daily and peak bank loan borrowings outstanding under the
Credit Agreement during the
2008 nine-month period were $47.4 million and $101 million, respectively. The average daily and
peak bank loan borrowings outstanding under the Credit Agreement during the 2007 nine-month period
were $2.0 million and $92 million, respectively. The higher balances in fiscal 2008 reflect in
large part higher cash needed to fund increases in working capital due to the significantly higher
propane product costs.
AmeriGas Partners periodically issues equity securities and may continue to do so. Proceeds from
the Partnership’s equity offerings have generally been used by the Partnership to reduce
indebtedness and for general Partnership purposes, including funding acquisitions.
At June 30, 2008, the amount of net assets of Partnership’s subsidiaries that was restricted from
transfer as a result of the amount of Available Cash, computed in accordance with the Partnership
Agreement, the applicable debt agreements and the partnership agreements of the Partnership’s
subsidiaries, totaled approximately $1,100 million.
During the nine months ended June 30, 2008, the Partnership declared and paid quarterly
distributions on all limited partner units at a rate of $0.61 per Common Unit for each of the
quarters ended December 31, 2007 and September 30, 2007, and at a rate of $0.64 per Common Unit for
the quarter ended March 31, 2008. The quarterly distribution of $0.64 per limited partner unit for
the quarter ended June 30, 2008 will be paid on August 18, 2008 to holders of record on August 8,
2008. The ability of the Partnership to declare and pay the quarterly distribution on its Common
Units in the future depends upon a number of factors. These factors include (1) the level of
Partnership earnings; (2) the cash needs of the Partnership’s operations (including cash needed for
maintaining and increasing operating capacity); (3) changes in operating working capital; and (4)
the Partnership’s ability to borrow under its Credit Agreement, refinance maturing debt, and
increase its long-term debt. Some of these factors are affected by conditions beyond the
Partnership’s control including weather, competition in markets we serve, the cost of propane and
changes in capital market conditions.
- 19 -
AMERIGAS PARTNERS, L.P.
Cash Flows
Operating activities. The Partnership had cash and cash equivalents totaling $10.5 million at June
30, 2008 compared to $34.0 million at September 30, 2007. Due to the seasonal nature of the
propane business, cash flows from operating activities are generally strongest during the second
and third fiscal quarters when customers pay for propane purchased during the heating season
months. Conversely, operating cash flows are generally at their lowest levels during the first and
fourth fiscal quarters when the Partnership’s investment in working capital, principally accounts
receivable and inventories, is generally greatest. Accordingly, cash flows from operating
activities during the nine months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 are not necessarily indicative of
cash flows to be expected for a full year. The Partnership generally uses its Revolving Credit
Facility to satisfy its seasonal cash flow needs.
Cash flow provided by operating activities was $103.0 million during the 2008 nine-month period
compared to cash provided of $117.0 million during the 2007 nine-month period. Cash flow from
operating activities before changes in working capital was $253.8 million in the 2008 nine-month
period compared to $239.4 million in the prior-year nine-month period reflecting the improved 2008
nine-month period results. Cash required to fund changes in operating working capital during the
2008 nine-month period totaled $150.8 million compared to $122.4 million required in the
prior-year nine-month period. The higher cash required to fund operating working capital in the
2008 nine-month period compared with the 2007 nine-month period principally reflects the impact of
the timing of purchases of propane and increases in propane prices on cash receipts from customers.
This increase in working capital cash requirements was partially offset principally by the effects
of the timing of payments and increasing purchase price per gallon of propane on accounts payable
and the timing of customers’ use of their deposits and prepayments.
Investing activities. We spent $48.2 million for property, plant and equipment (including
maintenance capital expenditures of $20.9 million and growth capital expenditures of $27.3 million)
during the 2008 nine-month period compared to $58.3 million (including maintenance capital
expenditures of $19.6 million and growth capital expenditures of $38.7 million) during the
prior-year nine-month period. During the 2008 nine-month period, we made cash payments of $2.7
million associated with business acquisitions which was partially offset by a $1.2 million cash
payment we received from a working capital adjustment associated with a fiscal 2007 business
acquisition. During the 2007 nine-month period, we made cash payments of $27.8 million associated
with business acquisitions.
Financing activities. Cash flow used by financing activities was $84.0 million in the 2008
nine-month period compared to $103.6 million of cash flow used in the prior-year period. The
Partnership’s cash flows from financing activities are typically the result of repayments and
issuances of long-term debt, borrowings under AmeriGas OLP’s Credit Agreement, issuances of Common
Units and distributions on partnership interests. During the 2008 nine-month period, the
Partnership had net borrowings under the Credit Agreement totaling $26 million which were used to
fund the increased working capital. AmeriGas Partners paid total cash distributions to Common
Unitholders and the General Partner totaling $107.5 million and $101.6 million during the 2008 and
the 2007 nine-month periods, respectively. The higher amount in the 2008 nine-month period
principally reflects higher quarterly per-unit distribution rates in the current year compared with
the prior year nine-month period.
- 20 -
AMERIGAS PARTNERS, L.P.
AmeriGas OLP Environmental Matter
By letter dated March 6, 2008, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (“DEC”)
notified AmeriGas OLP that DEC had placed property owned by the Partnership in Saranac Lake, New
York on its
Registry of Inactive Hazardous Waste Disposal Sites. A site characterization study performed by
DEC disclosed contamination related to former manufactured gas plant operations on the site. DEC
has classified the site as a significant threat to public health or environment with further action
required. The Partnership is researching the history of the site and is investigating DEC’s
findings. The General Partner has reviewed the preliminary site characterization study prepared by
the DEC and is in the early stages of investigating the extent of contamination and the possible
existence of other potentially responsible parties. Due to the early stage of such investigation,
an estimate of possible loss cannot be made. It is reasonably possible that such estimate of
possible loss could be material to the Partnership’s results of operations.
Pending Asset Sale
On July 30, 2008, AmeriGas OLP signed a definitive agreement to sell its 600,000 barrel
refrigerated, above-ground storage facility located on leased property in California for
approximately $43.0 million in cash. The transaction is subject to customary closing conditions and
is expected to close approximately sixty to ninety days after July 30, 2008. Upon closing, we
expect to record a gain of approximately $39.0 million to
$41.0 million associated with this transaction.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Our primary financial market risks are commodity prices for propane and interest rates on
borrowings.
The risk associated with fluctuations in the prices the Partnership pays for propane is principally
a result of market forces reflecting changes in supply and demand for propane and other energy
commodities. The Partnership’s profitability is sensitive to changes in propane supply costs, and
the Partnership generally attempts to pass on increases in such costs to customers. The
Partnership may not, however, always be able to pass through product cost increases fully, or on a
timely basis, particularly when product costs rise rapidly. In order to reduce the volatility of
the Partnership’s propane market price risk, we use contracts for the forward purchase or sale of
propane, propane fixed-price supply agreements, and over-the-counter derivative commodity
instruments including price swap and option contracts. Over-the-counter derivative commodity
instruments utilized by the Partnership are generally settled at expiration of the contract. In
order to minimize credit risk associated with derivative commodity contracts, we monitor
established credit limits with the contract counterparties. Although we use derivative financial
and commodity instruments to reduce market price risk associated with
forecasted transactions, we do not use derivative financial and commodity instruments for
speculative or trading purposes.
The Partnership has both fixed-rate and variable-rate debt. Changes in interest rates impact the
cash flows of variable-rate debt but generally do not impact its fair value. Conversely, changes
in interest rates impact the fair value of fixed-rate debt but do not impact its cash flows.
- 21 -
AMERIGAS PARTNERS, L.P.
Our variable-rate debt includes borrowings under AmeriGas OLP’s Credit Agreement. This agreement
has interest rates that are generally indexed to short-term market interest rates. Our long-term
debt is typically issued at fixed rates of interest based upon market rates for debt having similar
terms and credit ratings. As these long-term debt issues mature, we may refinance such debt with
new debt having interest rates reflecting then-current market conditions. This debt may have an
interest rate that is more or less than the refinanced debt. In order to reduce interest rate risk
associated with near to medium term forecasted issuances of fixed-rate debt, from time to time we
enter into interest rate protection agreements.
The following table summarizes the fair values of unsettled market risk sensitive derivative
instruments held at June 30, 2008. Fair values reflect the estimated amounts that we would receive
or (pay) to terminate the contracts at the reporting date based upon quoted market prices of
comparable contracts at June 30, 2008. The table also includes the changes in fair value that
would result if there were a ten percent adverse change in (1) the market price of propane and (2)
the three-month LIBOR:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Fair |
|
|
Change in |
|
| |
|
Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
| |
|
(Millions of dollars) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2008: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Propane commodity price risk |
|
$ |
30.3 |
|
|
$ |
(31.2 |
) |
Interest rate risk |
|
|
(3.4 |
) |
|
|
(4.2 |
) |
Because the Partnership’s derivative instruments generally qualify as hedges under Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities,” we expect that changes in the fair value of derivative instruments used to manage
propane price or interest rate risk would be substantially offset by gains or losses on the
associated anticipated transactions.
- 22 -
AMERIGAS PARTNERS, L.P.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
| (a) |
|
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures |
| |
| |
|
The Partnership’s management, with the participation of the Partnership’s Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the Partnership’s
disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based
on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that
the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by
this report were designed and functioning effectively to provide reasonable assurance that
the information required to be disclosed by the Partnership in reports filed under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules
and forms, and (ii) accumulated and communicated to our management, including the Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions
regarding disclosure. |
| |
| (b) |
|
Change in Internal Control over Financial Reporting |
| |
| |
|
No change in the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting occurred during the
Partnership’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting. |
- 23 -
AMERIGAS PARTNERS, L.P.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider
the factors discussed in Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2007, which could materially affect our business, financial
condition or future results. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the
only risks facing the Partnership. Other unknown or unpredictable factors could also have material
adverse effects on future results.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
The exhibits filed as part of this report are as follows (exhibits incorporated by reference are
set forth with the name of the registrant, the type of report and registration number or last date
of the period for which it was filed, and the exhibit number in such filing):
Incorporation by Reference
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| No. |
|
Exhibit |
|
Registrant |
|
Filing |
|
Exhibit |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
10.1 |
|
|
Form of Change in
Control Agreement
Amended and Restated
as of May 12, 2008
for Mr. Bissell |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
10.2 |
|
|
Form of Change in
Control Agreement
Amended and Restated
as of May 12, 2008
for Messrs. Sheridan,
Monaghan, Katz and
Lugar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
10.3 |
|
|
Form of Change in
Control Agreement
Amended and Restated
as of May 12, 2008
for Mr. Stanczak |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
10.4 |
|
|
Form of Change in
Control Agreement
Amended and Restated
as of May 12, 2008
for Messrs.
Greenberg, Knauss and
Walsh
|
|
UGI
Corporation
|
|
Form 10-Q
(6/30/08)
|
|
10.3 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
31.1 |
|
|
Certification by the
Chief Executive Officer
relating to the
Registrant’s Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 2008,
pursuant to Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
31.2 |
|
|
Certification by the
Chief Financial Officer
relating to the
Registrant’s Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 2008,
pursuant to Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
32 |
|
|
Certification by the
Chief Executive Officer
and the Chief Financial
Officer relating to the
Registrant’s Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 2008,
pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 24 -
AMERIGAS PARTNERS, L.P.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
AmeriGas Partners, L.P.
|
|
| |
(Registrant)
|
| |
By: |
AmeriGas Propane, Inc.,
|
|
| |
|
as General Partner |
|
| |
| Date: August 8, 2008 |
By: |
/s/ Jerry E. Sheridan
|
|
| |
|
Jerry E. Sheridan |
|
| |
|
Vice President — Finance
and Chief Financial Officer |
|
| |
| Date: August 8, 2008 |
By: |
/s/ William J. Stanczak
|
|
| |
|
William J. Stanczak |
|
| |
|
Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |
|
| |
- 25 -
AMERIGAS PARTNERS, L.P.
EXHIBIT INDEX
| 10.1 |
|
Form of Change in Control Agreement Amended and Restated as of May 12, 2008 for Mr. Bissell |
| |
| 10.2 |
|
Form of Change in Control Agreement Amended and Restated as of May 12, 2008 for Messrs.
Sheridan, Monaghan, Katz and Lugar |
| |
| 10.3 |
|
Form of Change in Control Agreement Amended and Restated as of May 12, 2008 for Mr. Stanczak |
| |
| 31.1 |
|
Certification by the Chief Executive Officer relating to the Registrant’s Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. |
| |
| 31.2 |
|
Certification by the Chief Financial Officer relating to the Registrant’s Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. |
| |
| 32 |
|
Certification by the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer relating to the
Registrant’s Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |