SCHEDULE 14A
(RULE 14A-101)
INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(A) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Filed by the registrant /X/
Filed by a party other than the registrant / /
Check the appropriate box:
/X/ Preliminary Proxy Statement (Revocation of Consent Statement)
/ / Confidential, For Use of the Commission only (as permitted by
Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
/ / Definitive Consent Statement
/ / Definitive Additional Materials
/ / Soliciting Material Under Rule 14a-12
AUSTINS STEAKS & SALOON, INC.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, If Other Than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
/X/ No fee required.
/ / Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
(1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
-1-
(3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the
filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(5) Total fee paid:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
/ / Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
/ / Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule
0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid
previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number,
or the form or schedule and the date of its filing.
(1) Amount Previously Paid:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(3) Filing Party:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(4) Date Filed:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
-2-
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED SEPTEMBER ___, 2002
----------
REVOCATION OF CONSENT STATEMENT
BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF
AUSTINS STEAKS & SALOONS, INC.
----------
Dear Stockholders:
The Board of Directors of Austins Steaks & Saloons, Inc., a Delaware
corporation ("Austins" or the "Company") is furnishing this Revocation of
Consent Statement and the accompanying BLUE Revocation of Consent Card to the
holders of the outstanding shares of Austins common stock, par value $0.01 per
share, in opposition to the solicitation by a small group calling themselves the
"Austins Group" (the "Dissidents"), who collectively own slightly more than 23%
of the Company's outstanding stock.
The Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Austins was recently held on June 25,
2002. At that time, nine persons were elected to serve as Directors of your
Company for the ensuing year. One of the persons elected at the Annual Meeting
was Titus W. Greene. Mr. Greene served on the Nominating Committee, which
Committee nominated the persons who were elected.
Mr. Greene resigned from the Company's Board of Directors effective as of
July 18, 2002. Mr. Greene and the Dissidents (Titus W. Greene, G. Thomas Cliett,
Charles W. Mantooth and Thomas M. Hontzas) are now asking you to remove all of
your current Directors except Paul C. Schorr, III, Roger D. Sack, and William E.
Proffitt, and to elect six persons nominated by the Dissidents. Accordingly, a
consent in favor of the Dissidents' proposals is a consent to turn control of
your Austins Board over to the Dissidents.
The Dissidents allege a "pattern of mismanagement" and yet acknowledge that
three of the Dissidents have served as Directors of Austins during the period of
time in which they allege that the mismanagement has occurred.
-3-
Rather then raise their concerns directly with management or the Board, the
Dissidents have chosen this time-consuming and very expensive process. We
estimate our costs will be several hundred thousand dollars. The Dissidents will
spend a similar amount. If you vote for their proposals and turn over control of
Austins to them, they will seek reimbursement of their costs. At a time when
management is reducing costs and conserving cash, it makes no sense to incur
$400,000 or more of needless expense.
We believe that your current Austins Board is in the best position to
continue to move the Company forward. The current Board instituted a plan to
close or franchise under-performing stores in November 1999, and has sold or
franchised 13 company-operated units, which the Board anticipates will result in
a $700,000 increase in cash flow annually. The attached Revocation of Consent
Statement responds to the Dissidents' contentions and highlights certain
statements and omissions in the Consent Statement of the Dissidents which your
Board believes are false and misleading.
THEREFORE, WE ARE URGING YOU NOT TO GIVE ANY CONSENTS IN RESPONSE TO THE
DISSIDENTS SOLICITATION, AND WE ARE SEEKING THE REVOCATION OF ANY CONSENTS THAT
MAY HAVE BEEN GIVEN TO THE DISSIDENTS SOLICITATION.
YOUR AUSTINS BOARD (WITH THE EXCEPTION OF WILLIAM E. PROFFITT) OPPOSES THE
DISSIDENTS CONSENT SOLICITATION AND URGES YOU NOT TO SIGN ANY GOLD CONSENT CARD
SENT TO YOU BY THE DISSIDENTS. THE BOARD URGES YOU TO DISCARD ANY GOLD CONSENT
CARDS SENT TO YOU BY THE DISSIDENTS.
IF YOU HAVE PREVIOUSLY SIGNED AND RETURNED ANY GOLD CONSENT CARD TO THE
DISSIDENTS, YOU HAVE EVERY RIGHT TO CHANGE YOUR MIND. THE BOARD URGES YOU TO
SIGN, DATE AND MAIL THE ENCLOSED BLUE REVOCATION OF CONSENT CARD IN THE
POSTAGE-PAID ENVELOPE PROVIDED.
EVEN IF YOU HAVE NOT PREVIOUSLY SIGNED AND RETURNED ANY GOLD CONSENT CARD
TO THE DISSIDENTS, YOU MAY STILL SEND A BLUE REVOCATION OF CONSENT CARD TO
AUSTINS, WHICH WILL HAVE NO LEGAL EFFECT BUT WOULD ASSIST US IN MONITORING THE
PROGRESS OF THE CONSENT SOLICITATION.
IF YOUR SHARES ARE HELD IN THE NAME OF A BANK, BROKER OR OTHER NOMINEE,
ONLY YOUR BANK, BROKER OR OTHER NOMINEE CAN EXECUTE A REVOCATION OF CONSENT FOR
YOUR SHARES, AND ONLY PURSUANT TO YOUR SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS. ACCORDINGLY, YOU
ARE URGED TO REJECT THE DISSIDENTS BY SIGNING, DATING AND RETURNING THE ENCLOSED
BLUE REVOCATION OF CONSENT CARD PROMPTLY, USING THE ACCOMPANYING POSTAGE-PREPAID
ENVELOPE PROVIDED BY YOUR BANK, BROKER OR NOMINEE.
-4-
This Revocation of Consent Statement is first being furnished to
Stockholders of Austins on or about September _______, 2002.
If you have questions regarding completion of your BLUE Revocation of
Consent Card, please call:
Victor F. Foti, President or Robyn B. Mabe, CFO
(540) 345-3195 (540) 345-3195
or or
1-800-642-2157 1-800-642-2157
-5-
AUSTINS STEAKS & SALOON, INC.
----------
NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
PREVIOUSLY SCHEDULED FOR OCTOBER 14, 2002
----------
TO OUR STOCKHOLDERS
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Special Meeting of Stockholders of Austins
Steaks & Saloon, Inc., a Delaware corporation, ("Austins") or ("Company")
previously scheduled for October 14, 2002 at 10:00 a.m. local time at the
Renaissance Hotel, 1 Hartfield Centre Parkway, Atlanta, Georgia 30354, has been
cancelled. The Company originally called the meeting at the request of the
Dissidents, but the Dissidents have now revoked their request for the special
meeting. The Company is attempting to comply with the sometimes confusing
requests of the Dissidents, and apologizes for any confusion or inconvenience
this may cause.
Sincerely,
Victor F. Foti
President and Chief Executive
Officer
Roanoke, Virginia
September __, 2002
-6-
INFORMATION REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Revocation of Consent Statement may contain some forward-looking
statements. Forward-looking statements give our current expectations or
forecasts of future events. You can identify these statements by the fact that
they do not relate strictly to historical or current information. They use words
such as "anticipate," "estimate," "expect," "project," "intend," "plan,"
"believe," and other words and terms of similar meaning in connection with any
discussion of future operating or financial performance. In particular, these
include statements relating to future actions and plans, future performance, and
potential growth and performance of the Company.
Any and all of our forward-looking statements in this Revocation of Consent
Statement can be affected by inaccurate assumptions we might make or by known or
unknown risks and uncertainties. Consequently, no forward-looking statement can
be guaranteed. Because these statements are subject to risks and uncertainties,
actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by the
forward-looking statements. We caution you not to place undue reliance on the
statements, which speak only as of the date of this Revocation of Consent
Statement. We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking
statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.
The cautionary statements contained or referred to in this section should be
considered in connection with any subsequent written or oral forward-looking
statements that we or persons acting on our behalf may issue.
REASONS YOUR AUSTINS BOARD
OPPOSES THE DISSIDENTS' CONSENT SOLICITATION
The Dissidents indicate that they are disappointed with the Company's
performance, financial condition and stock price. Your management and the
current Board of Directors are also not satisfied with the earnings and the
stock price. None of us, including the Dissidents, can control the market price
of any individual stock including Austins.
Over the last two years, investors have suffered the most significant
decline in the stock market since 1987. During that two year period, the S&P 500
has dropped 41.7% and the NASDAQ has dropped 69.8%, while Austins shares have
increased 6.15% (based on closing prices on September 5, 2000 and September 5,
2002. Source - http://finance.yahoo.com).
-7-
All that the management and current Board can do is work hard to increase
the earnings of Austins. We have been through several difficult years in the
Company's history but the Board and management have been working hard to
position the Company for future growth and profitability. For example, general
and administrative expenses have been reduced from approximately $5,310,000 in
the year 2000 to $2,650,000 in 2001. Additionally, we believe that due to our
strategy of closing or franchising under performing company-owned stores and a
campaign to change the image of the WesterN SizzliN concept, we will show
increased earnings and we ask for your continued support to implement our plan.
After reviewing the Dissidents' plan, we believe that this very costly and
time-consuming process initiated by the Dissidents offers virtually nothing that
the Company has not undertaken already. Let's examine their plan.
- The Dissidents want to undertake a line-by-line review of the revenue
and expense items of the Company to operate more efficiently, reduce
overhead and improve liquidity. In fact, detailed monthly operating
information is provided to our Board of Directors and has been for the
past several years. Line-by-line reviews have been done in the past by
board request and approved without change. In 1995, Jerry Gardner,
then chairman of the Finance and Audit Committee, requested and
received a line-by-line review of the Company financial statements.
Again, in 1997, Jesse Harrington III, then chairman of the Finance and
Audit Committee and currently one of the Dissidents' nominees to be a
Director, requested and received a line-by-line review of the Company
financial statements.
- The Dissidents want to evaluate company-owned stores with a focus on
stemming the losses. This is precisely the program the Board has been
effecting over the past several years. Over the past two years, 13
Company-owned stores have been closed, franchised or subleased. By the
end of the current calendar year, it is expected that all unprofitable
company stores will either be sold or franchised.
During the time that various Dissidents were on the WesterN SizzliN
Board, they never objected to the acquisition of Company stores
(except Mr. Hontzas's opposition to the Shreveport lease in 1997
because he thought the stores had been poorly run previously).
-8-
During the time that the Dissidents were on the Board, they approved
of the acquisition of 26 Company stores.
Management has determined over the past several years, that it is
difficult for a small organization such as Austins to profitably
operate company-stores. What the Dissidents fail to point out to you,
however, is that under generally accepted accounting principles,
stores cannot just be closed on a moment's notice without incurring
significant impairment losses. Management believes that it has acted
responsibly and in a timely manner to reduce the impact to the
financial statements of Company store closings.
- The Dissidents want to minimize costly legal expenses and losses by
not initiating so-called misguided lawsuits. The Dissidents do not
point out to you, however, that the most expensive litigation in the
Company's history occurred when Mr. Greene was chairman of the board
of The WesterN SizzliN Corporation. At the first meeting of the board
of directors following the reorganization of the Company after coming
out of bankruptcy at the end of 1993, Mr. Greene and David Wachtel,
then president and chief executive officer of the Company, had a
confrontation about who would be chairman of the board. Mr. Greene
prevailed. Under Mr. Greene's leadership, David Wachtel was terminated
approximately 14 months later in February 1995. Mr. Wachtel then sued
for substantial damages alleging a breach of his employment agreement.
The ultimate resolution of this litigation cost the Company over $1.65
million in legal fees and a $1 million settlement to Mr. Wachtel.
Currently, the Company is involved in only one piece of operating
litigation involving lease disputes with the landlord of five company
stores in Louisiana. We sued the landlord over his refusal to allow us
to sublease certain of these stores to other operators and thereby
recoup some value to the Company. Contrary to the Dissidents'
assertions, we believe the Company has meritorious claims against the
landlord, but even if the landlord should prevail in claims the
landlord may make, the cost would be approximately offset by the
Company's claims against the landlord. The landlord prevailed in his
attempt to evict the Company from the stores, which claim the Company
lost on appeal. However, the Company has other
-9-
outstanding claims against the landlord for billboard revenue that are
expected to go to trial in 2003. We do not believe that the litigation
is material or will have any material adverse impact upon the
Company's financial condition. Disclosure was made in the Company's
Form 10-Q for June 30, 2002 even though the litigation is not material
according to Regulation S-K, because certain members of the Dissidents
were falsely telling stockholders that a one million judgment had been
rendered against the Company.
We have one other piece of litigation pending against the Dissidents.
Again, contrary to their representations to you, we did not initiate
the lawsuit to prevent them from proceeding with their consent
procedure but because they were proceeding in a manner which we
believed was violating federal securities laws.
- The Dissidents want to restore confidence in and communications with
franchisees. Again, that has been an articulated strategy of
management over the past several years. The Quincy's transaction,
which we will discuss below, ultimately netted over twenty new
franchisees. We have enhanced our franchise activities over the past
two years by providing additional services and training to franchisees
and we are continually searching for new and profitable opportunities.
We are NOT considering a plan to increase franchise fees for existing
franchisees. We do, however, intend to increase franchise fees for NEW
FRANCHISEES, as disclosed in our Uniform Franchise Offering Circular.
Along with the image enhancement program, we will continue to develop
new ideas for franchisees to upgrade their store images and physical
facilities and derive new and additional revenues. No quantifiable
information is yet available for these efforts.
- The Dissidents want to implement long-range strategic planning with an
emphasis on developing systems to grow earnings and increase
shareholder value. We have been doing exactly that over the past
several years. Our long range strategy of closing or franchising
unprofitable company owned units and improving and enhancing the
franchise program is calculated to significantly increase earnings and
stockholder value. The anticipated increase in cash flow of $700,000
-10-
annually is based upon historical averages of the amount that the
unprofitable stores were costing the Company.
In addition, we engaged J.H. Chapman Group, LLC in Chicago, a
recognized investment banking firm in the restaurant area, to analyze
a variety of different investment opportunities for the Company,
including the potential sale of the Company. Titus Greene, one of the
Dissidents, met with J.H. Chapman personnel in May, 2002, and voted
with the other directors to engage the J.H. Chapman Group. As a result
of the Dissidents' action, Chapman advised by letter dated July 29,
2002 that it could go no further for you, the stockholders, until the
struggle with the Dissidents is resolved.
- The Dissidents want to operate the Company like a public company by
complying with disclosure obligations. We believe that we have been so
operating and will continue to operate in the future. We did have
several mistakes in the May 24, 2002 proxy statement which we need to
discuss with you. Through inadvertence, and not intention, we failed
to disclose to you the one year severance package voted to Mr. Foti
and Ms. Mabe in the event the Company is sold or merged. This action
was taken to encourage management continuity in the event of a sale or
merger. The severance package does not apply to the current proxy
battle. In August, 2001, your Board of Directors approved the
amendment of the Company Bylaws to provide for a staggered Board of
Directors. The May 24, 2002 proxy statement was inaccurately drawn and
failed to include the provision for shareholder approval of the
amendment to the Bylaws. When this error was brought to the Company's
attention, it was explained at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders and
the Directors were elected for only a one year term which was
appropriate under Delaware law.
The Company WAS NOT ADVISED BY THE DELAWARE SECRETARY OF STATE OR THE
COMPANY'S REGISTERED AGENT IN DELAWARE that it had been dissolved for
non-payment of its franchise taxes. A former officer of the Company
apparently failed to pay these taxes, unbeknownst to current
management. The taxes have now been paid, the Company is in good
standing with the State of Delaware and we believe this will have no
further impact upon the Company.
-11-
Additionally, we want to set the facts straight on a number of other
matters which the Dissidents raise in their Consent Solicitation Statement.
- The Dissidents state that Titus Greene, and the other members of the
Dissidents, feel the current makeup of the Board hinders the Company's
future prospects. Mr. Greene was a director of the Company from 1994
to 1997, and again from 1999 until July 18, 2002, when he resigned.
Mr. Greene was also a member of the Board Nominating Committee for
2002. Mr. Greene never proposed, either this year or in prior years,
any new or different nominees for the Board of Directors. Mr. Greene
did not object to the current slate of directors which were approved
by you in June. Mr. Mantooth was on the Board of Directors in 1998 and
1999 and Mr. Hontzas was on the Board from 1997 to 2001. Mr. Mantooth
resigned specifically to allow Mr. Greene onto the Board. Mr. Hontzas
resigned in June 2001 due to health concerns. Neither of them ever
offered new or different nominees to the Board of Directors nor
objected to the nominees who were presented. The day following the
2002 annual meeting, Victor Foti invited Mr. Greene and the other
Dissidents to Roanoke, Virginia to discuss any concerns or problems
about the Company or management. No one chose to come. Until now, none
of the Dissidents has ever come forward to meet with management or the
current Board of Directors to propose any changes in management
strategy or any changes in the Board of Directors.
- The Dissidents complain about the Quincy's transaction. The Quincy's
transaction was a bold move by management to try to significantly
enhance earnings and shareholder value. The strategy was not totally
successful, however, the Company ultimately netted over 20 new
franchised units. The expected royalty stream from these units over
the next 20 years should more than make up for the net loss in the
year 2000. The Quincy's program was responsible for losses in 2000 of
$1.2 million, and in 2001 of $164,000. This transaction increased the
average life of the franchised system from nine years to eleven years.
With twenty-three franchises, if each franchise averages $1.2 million
in revenues (based on historical averages of stores in the franchise
system), and the Company receives a 2% royalty stream plus transfer
fees, this would equate to a minimum of $11 million to the Company
over the next twenty years.
-12-
- In an earlier filing with the SEC, the Dissidents proposed Mr. W.E.
Proffitt as a director. Management would likely have proposed Mr.
Proffitt as a director nominee if Mr. Greene had not stood for
re-election. Since Mr. Greene resigned and joined the Dissidents, the
Board of Directors on August 12, 2002 elected Mr. Proffitt to fill out
Mr. Greene's term on the Board.
- The Dissidents' complain about a salary increase and a bonus to Mr.
Foti. In the year 2000, the Company was hiring two additional
officers. Mr. Foti, on his own initiative, agreed to a $30,000 per
year salary reduction, in order to lessen the impact of the hiring of
these new officers. Both of the officers have since left the Company
and one has not been replaced. The Compensation Committee merely
restored Mr. Foti's salary to its previous level and gave him the one
time bonus to make up for his salary reduction. This was not an
additional increase for Mr. Foti.
Management and the current Board believe that the Company's financial
condition is good at this point. The Company has improved its ratio of current
assets to current liabilities to .74 and has a debt to equity ratio of .37. The
Company has reduced indebtedness by $1.16 million since December, 2000, thereby
strengthening the balance sheet. We believe that franchise revenues are
positioned for growth based on an increase in the number of franchises due to
our image enhancement program, and increased fees to be paid by the new
franchises. Additionally, operating expenses have been drastically reduced -
general and administrative expenses have been reduced from approximately
$5,310,000 in the year 2000 to $2,650,000 in 2001.
Before you think about signing a Gold card to replace current management
and the Board of Directors, please take into account that the Dissidents are
critical of Company decisions in which at least one of them participated in all
such decisions as a Director of the Company. Further, the Dissidents have
proposed no new plan to increase profitability or to increase the value of your
shares.
DISSIDENTS' PROPOSALS
The Dissidents are soliciting your consent to the following three actions.
WE BELIEVE THAT THE DISSIDENTS' PROPOSALS WILL DISADVANTAGE
-13-
AUSTINS STOCKHOLDERS AND URGE YOU NOT TO SIGN AND TO DISCARD ANY GOLD CONSENT
CARD SENT TO YOU BY THE DISSIDENTS.
(1) Remove six (6) of the current nine (9) Austins Directors (all except
Paul C. Schorr, III, Roger D. Sack, and William E. Proffitt) and
remove any other Directors elected or appointed to the Austins Board
before the effective time of this shareholder action.
(2) Elect Titus W. Greene, Charles W. Mantooth, Thomas M. Hontzas, Charles
H. Wright, Pat Vezertzis, and Jesse M. Harrington, III to replace the
six (6) removed Directors and to serve as Directors of Austins until
their respective successors are duly elected and qualified or their
earlier resignation or removal.
(3) Repeal any amendment to the Company's Bylaws adopted by the current
Board between July 17, 2002 and the date on which this Stockholder
action becomes effective.
Dissidents' Proposal No. 2 is conditioned upon the adoption of the
Dissident Proposal No. 1. Dissidents' Proposal Nos. 1 and 2 are designed to
enable the Dissidents to take control of your Company's Board of Directors.
Dissidents' Proposal No. 3 is designed to nullify unspecified bylaws which may
be adopted by your Board in its effort to act in and protect the interests of
Austins' stockholders. As of the date of this Revocation of Consent Statement,
Austins has not adopted or amended any bylaws subsequent to July 17, 2002.
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THIS
REVOCATION OF CONSENT SOLICITATION
Q: WHO IS MAKING THE SOLICITATION?
A: This Revocation of Consent Solicitation is being made by the Board of
Directors of your Company (except W.E. Proffitt). Members of the Board of
Directors are the beneficial owners of approximately 20.3% of the
Company's common stock as of September 5, 2002, which is the Record Date.
Q: WHAT ARE WE ASKING YOU TO DO?
-14-
A: We are asking you to not sign any GOLD cosent card and to sign and return
the BLUE Revocation of Consent Card.
Q: WHO CAN ACT ON THESE MATTERS?
A: If you owned shares of the Company on the Record Date, you have the right
to give consent as to the proposals, even if you disposed of some or all of
your shares after the Record Date.
Q: HOW MANY SHARES MUST BE VOTED IN FAVOR OF THE DISSIDENTS' PROPOSALS TO
ADOPT THEM?
A: The Dissidents must receive proxies from a majority (i.e., more than 50%)
of the issued and outstanding shares of Austins common stock as of the
Record Date as to Proposal No. 1 in order for that proposal to be adopted.
As of the Consent Record Date, the Company had 12,178,800 shares of common
stock outstanding. Therefore, the affirmative vote of at least 6,089,401
shares is necessary to adopt Dissidents' Proposal No. 1. Abstentions,
failures to vote and broker non-votes will have the same effect as a "no"
vote on Proposal No. 1. The Board of Directors of your Company beneficially
own 2,472,419 shares, or 20.3%, of the Company's issued and outstanding
shares and the individual Directors DO NOT intend to vote for any of the
Dissidents' Proposals. If Proposal No. 1 is adopted, Directors may be
elected under Proposal No. 2 by a plurality of votes cast.
Q: WHAT IS THE DEADLINE FOR SUBMITTING REVOCATION OF CONSENTS?
A: Revocation of Proxies must be received by the Company not later than 10:00
a.m. (EST) on the day of the Special Stockholders Meeting, October 14,
2002. WE URGE YOU TO ACT PROMPTLY. EVEN IF YOU HAVE NOT SIGNED AND RETURNED
A GOLD CONSENT CARD WE URGE YOU TO SIGN AND RETURN A BLUE REVOCATION OF
CONSENT CARD, WHICH WILL HAVE NO EFFECT BUT WILL ASSIST US IN MONITORING
THE PROGRESS OF THE CONSENT SOLICITATION.
Q: WHAT SHOULD YOU DO TO WITHHOLD OR REVOKE YOUR CONSENT?
-15-
A: If your shares of common stock are held in your own name, please sign, date
and fax the enclosed BLUE Revocation of Consent Card today to Victor F.
Foti at (540) 345-0831. Please also mail or hand-deliver the original to
Austins at 317 Kimball Avenue NW, Roanoke, Virginia, 24016.
If your shares of common stock are held in "Street Name" (e.g., by a broker
or bank), only your broker or bank can execute a Revocation of Consent Card
on your behalf, but only upon receipt of your specific instructions. Please
sign, date and mail or hand-deliver the enclosed REVOCATION OF CONSENT
INSTRUCTION FORM to your broker or bank today, along with the BLUE
REVOCATION OF CONSENT CARD for your broker or bank to execute. Please also
contact the persons responsible for your account and instruct them to
execute the BLUE Revocation of Consent Card on your behalf and to date the
card.
If you need additional BLUE Revocation of Consent Cards for shares held in
more than one name, please contact Victor F. Foti or Robyn B. Mabe at (540)
345-3195 or 1-800-642-2157 and we will forward additional Revocation of
Consent Cards.
Q: CAN YOU CONSENT EVEN IF YOU HAVE EXECUTED AND RETURNED A REVOCATION OF
CONSENT?
A: Yes. You may revoke an executed Revocation of Consent Card at any time
before the vote is taken at the Special Meeting of Stockholders by marking,
dating, signing and delivering a written consent card to Charles W.
Mantooth in any manner of delivery. The delivery of a subsequent and
properly dated consent that is properly completed, in opposition to an
earlier consent, will also constitute a revocation of the earlier consent.
Q: WHOM DO YOU CALL IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS ABOUT THE SOLICITATION?
A: Please call Victor F. Foti at (540) 345-3195 or 1-800-642-2157 or Robyn B.
Mabe at (540) 345-3195 or 1-800-642-2157.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF AUSTINS
MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The names of the current members of the Board of Directors and certain
information about them are set forth below:
-16-
NAME AGE POSITION SINCE
---- --- -------- -----
J. Carson Quarles(3)(4)(5) 65 Chairman of the Board 1999
Victor F. Foti(5) 66 President, Chief 1999
Executive Officer and
Director
Paul C. Schorr, III(1) 65 Director 1994
Roger D. Sack(1) 67 Director 1995
A. Jones Yorke(1)(4)(5) 71 Director 1995
Ronald G. Stancill(3)(4)(5) 62 Director 1999
J. Alan Cowart(2)(5) 38 Director 1999
Stanley L. Bozeman, Jr.(2)(4)(5) 46 Director 1999
William E. Proffitt 37 Director 2002
----------
(1) Member of Audit Committee
(2) Member of Compensation Committee
(3) Member of Nominating Committee
(4) Member of Executive Committee
(5) Also a WesterN SizzliN Director
JAMES CARSON QUARLES has been a Director of the Company since July 1, 1999.
He has also been a Director of The WesterN SizzliN Corporation ("WesterN
SizzliN") since February 26, 1996 and Chairman of the WesterN SizzliN Board
since November 25, 1996. Pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger by and
among Austins Steaks & Saloon, Inc., Austins Acquisition Corp. and WesterN
SizzliN dated April 30, 1999 (the "Merger Agreement"), WesterN SizzliN became a
wholly owned subsidiary of the Company (the "Merger"). Mr. Quarles retired as
President of Southwestern
-17-
Region of Central Fidelity National Bank on December 31, 1994, completing a
37-year banking career. He has served on several boards. He is currently on the
Board of Directors of two other companies. Among his many past civic and
professional affiliations, he was a past member of the Board of Directors and
Executive Committee of the Virginia Bankers Association. Mr. Quarles has been
inducted into the National Business Colleges' Hall of Fame.
VICTOR F. FOTI has been the Company's President, Chief Executive Officer
and a Director since July 1, 1999. Mr. Foti has been WesterN SizzliN's President
and Chief Executive Officer since March 1, 1995. He has been a WesterN SizzliN
Director since May 14, 1997. He was Director, Secretary, Treasurer and Executive
Vice President of WesterN SizzliN from December 13, 1993 to March 1, 1995. Mr.
Foti became a Certified Public Accountant in June, 1959 and was employed by the
certified public accounting firm of Foti, Flynn, Lowen & Co., P.C. in Roanoke,
Virginia from 1976 to July 1, 1997. Mr. Foti has been a WesterN SizzliN
franchisee since July 1, 1986. Mr. Foti has served as President of the Virginia
Society of CPA's; served on the Board of Directors of the Virginia Society of
CPA's and the American Institute of CPA's.
PAUL C. SCHORR, III has been a Director of the Company since August 1,
1994. Mr. Schorr served as Chairman of the Board of the Company from June 20,
1995 until July 1, 1999. For the past twelve years, Mr. Schorr has served as the
President and Chief Executive Officer of ComCor Holding, Inc., a consulting
firm. In addition, Mr. Schorr is a Director of Ameritas Life Insurance Corp.;
The Schorr Family Company, Inc.; and the National Research Corporation (a public
company).
ROGER D. SACK has served as a Director of the Company since June 26, 1995.
For the past seventeen years, Mr. Sack has been associated with York Cold
Storage Company, a refrigeration and storage company. Mr. Sack performs
strategic planning and financial service for York Cold Storage Company. In
addition, from 1980 until May, 1995, Mr. Sack served as an Executive Vice
President and Director of York State Co., a bank holding company and he
currently serves as Director, President and Chief Executive Officer.
A. JONES YORKE has been a Director since 1999, and also is and has been a
WesterN SizzliN Director since May 12, 1999. Mr. Yorke was previously Chairman
and a Director of Auerbach Financial Group, Inc., an investment firm in New York
City since July, 1998. Prior to that, Mr. Yorke served as a Senior Officer of
Weatherly Securities and Coleman & Company Securities Corporation. He was
previously President of Paine Webber, Inc. and Executive Director of the
Securities and Exchange Commission.
-18-
RONALD G. STANCILL has been a Company Director and a WesterN SizzliN
Director since November 11, 1999. He was a WesterN SizzliN Director from 1993 to
1996. Mr. Stancill was previously a WesterN SizzliN franchisee.
J. ALAN COWART has been a Company Director and a WesterN SizzliN Director
since November 11, 1999. Mr. Cowart has been a WesterN SizzliN franchisee since
1985 and is presently the owner-operator of a restaurant in Pooler, Georgia.
STANLEY L. BOZEMAN, JR. has been a Director since July 1, 1999, and has
been a WesterN SizzliN Director since April 12, 1995. Mr. Bozeman has been a
WesterN SizzliN franchisee since 1979. He is presently the owner-operator of a
restaurant in Griffin, Georgia. He is the General and Managing Partner of
Bozeman Properties Limited Partnership and owner of Stan Bozeman Rental Property
Company.
WILLIAM E. PROFFITT has been a Director since August 12, 2002. Mr. Proffitt
has owned and operated a WesterN SizzliN franchise restaurant in
Charlottesville, Virginia since 1997. He previously served as Director of
Company Operations for WesterN SizzliN from 1996 to 1997.
CERTAIN LITIGATION
The Company filed suit to enjoin the Dissidents from violating federal
securities laws and interfering with contractual relationships. A temporary
restraining order issued by the Court on August 12, 2002 was terminated on
August 16, 2002. The Dissidents raised an issue with the court that the Company
had been dissolved in Delaware for non-payment of its franchise taxes. This
oversight, created by a former officer of the Company, was corrected and Austins
is, again, in good standing in the State of Delaware effective August 20, 2002.
The Company continues to pursue the litigation through discovery and
depositions.
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL
OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth the beneficial ownership of the Company's
Common Stock as of the Record Date (a) by each Director and each Executive
Officer, (b) by all Directors and Executive Officers as a group, and (c) by all
persons known to the Company to be the beneficial owners of more than 5% of the
Company's Common Stock. Unless otherwise indicated, the address for these
individuals is 317 Kimball Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia 24016.
-19-
NO. OF PERCENT
NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON SHARES CLASS (2)
-------------------------- ------ ---------
Victor F. Foti 645,175(3) 5.3%
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
Robyn B. Mabe 10,000 (1)
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer/
Corporate Secretary and Treasurer
J. Carson Quarles 36,666 (1)
Chairman
7323 Lamarre Circle
Roanoke, VA 24019
Stanley L. Bozeman, Jr. 286,000(4) 2.3%
Director
1412 North Expressway
Griffin, GA 30223
J. Alan Cowart 457,500(5) 3.8%
Director
104 Pine Lakes Avenue
Savannah, GA 31405
Paul C. Schorr, III 385,009(7) 3.2%
Director
P.O. Box 57310
Lincoln, NE 68505
Roger D. Sack 229,799 1.9%
Director
2745 East Gate Road
Lincoln, NE 68502
A. Jones Yorke 20,000(6) (1)
Director
450 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10022
-20-
Ronald G. Stancill 402,000(8) 3.3%
Director
P.O. Box 1149
Anniston, AL 36202
Titus W. Greene 2,000,000 16.4%
2109 Windermere Lane
Shelby, NC 28150
All Directors and Officers as a group beneficially own 2,472,149 shares or 20.3%
of the outstanding Common Stock as of September 5, 2002.
----------
(1) Represents less than 1% of the outstanding Common Stock of the Company.
(2) Based upon 12,178,800 shares of Common Stock outstanding as of August 6,
2002. Each named person is deemed to be the beneficial owner of shares of
Common Stock that may be acquired within sixty (60) days upon exercise of
stock options or warrants and shares, options or warrants owned indirectly
through a partnership or corporation. Accordingly, the number of shares and
percentage set forth next to the name of such person and all officers and
directors as a group include the shares of Common Stock issuable upon
presently exercisable stock options or warrants and shares, options or
warrants owned indirectly. However, the shares of Common Stock so issuable
upon exercise by any persons are not included in calculating the percentage
of Common Stock beneficially owned by any other stockholder.
(3) This number of beneficially owned shares includes 177,222 shares owned by
H-H Corporation, a corporation in which Mr. Foti has voting shares and
investment power; 157,185 shares owned by VIAMAC, Inc., a corporation in
which Mr. Foti has voting shares and investment power; 24,000 shares owned
by A Storage on Wheels, a corporation in which Mr. Foti has voting shares
and investment power; and 76,000 shares owned by Mr. Foti's spouse.
(4) This number of beneficially owned shares includes 10,000 shares purchasable
pursuant to currently exercisable options or warrants.
(5) This number of beneficially owned shares includes 12,000 shares owned by
two of Mr. Cowart's minor children.
-21-
(6) This number of beneficially owned shares includes 20,000 shares purchasable
pursuant to currently exercised options or warrants.
(7) This number of beneficially owned shares includes 121,181 shares owned
directly by The Schorr Family Company, Inc., in which Mr. Schorr is the
President and Chief Executive Officer.
(8) This number of beneficially owned shares includes 362,500 shares owned by
Lynden, Inc., a corporation wholly owned by Mr. Stancill, and 40,000 shares
owned personally.
SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Under the securities laws of the United States, the Company's directors,
executive officers, and any persons holding more than 10% of the outstanding
shares of common stock are required to report their ownership of such shares and
any changes in that ownership to the SEC. These persons also are required by SEC
regulations to furnish the Company with copies of these reports. Specific due
dates for these reports have been established and the Company is required to
report in this Revocation of Consent Statement any failure to file by these
dates during the 2001 fiscal year. Based solely on a review of the reports
furnished to the Company or written representations from the Company's directors
and executive officers, the Company believes that all of these filing
requirements were satisfied by the Company's directors, executive officers, and
10% holders during the 2001 fiscal year.
BOARD MEETINGS AND COMMITTEES
The Board of Directors of the Company met five times during 2001. The Board
acted on several matters in the form of Consent minutes. The Board of Directors
has an Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, a Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee and an Executive Committee.
The Board of Directors has an Audit Committee which currently consists of
directors Paul C. Schorr, III, Roger D. Sack and A. Jones Yorke (Chair). All
members of the Audit Committee meet the independence standards of the NASD. The
Audit Committee meets periodically with the Company's independent public
accountants and members of management to review the Company's accounting
policies. It also reviews the scope and adequacy of the independent accountants'
examination of the Company's annual financial statements. In addition, the Audit
Committee recommends the firm of independent public accountants to be retained
by the
-22-
Company. In 2001, the Audit Committee held telephone conferences and met six
times.
The Compensation Committee currently consists of Directors Stanley L.
Bozeman, Jr. and J. Alan Cowart. In 2001, the Committee held telephone
conferences and met five times.
The Nominating Committee, which currently consists of Directors Ronald G.
Stancill, and J. Carson Quarles, nominates candidates to serve as Directors. In
2001, the Committee met two times.
The Executive Committee, which currently consists of Directors J. Carson
Quarles, Ronald G. Stancill, Stanley L. Bozeman, Jr., and A. Jones Yorke,
conducts certain affairs of the Company in absence of the entire Board of
Directors and as allowed by the Company's Bylaws and applicable law. In 2001,
the Executive Committee did not meet.
Directors, both employee and non-employees, are paid $1,000 for each Board
meeting attended and $250 for each Committee meeting attended. Additionally, the
Directors received a $1,000 quarterly retainer in 2001 and receive a $1,500
quarterly retainer during 2002.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE. The following table sets forth compensation
paid to certain executive officers during the last three fiscal years.
NAME AND
PRINCIPAL POSITION YEAR SALARY BONUS OTHER
Victor F. Foti 2001 $150,000 $ 0 $10,000
President and Chief Executive Officer 2000 $150,000 $ 0 $10,000
1999 $173,077 $81,264 $ 7,000
Mr. Foti's 2002 salary has been increased to $180,000. Mr. Foti was paid a
$35,000 bonus in April, 2002. No stock options or stock appreciation rights were
granted to Mr. Foti in 2001. Mr. Foti has no outstanding options or stock
appreciation grants. No other executive officer was paid as much as $100,000
during any of the last three fiscal years.
-23-
In November 2, 2001, the Board of Directors adopted a resolution to provide
severance of one year's salary to Victor F. Foti and Robyn B. Mabe in the event
they are terminated within one year from the date of a sale or merger of
Austins.
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Messrs. Foti, Bozeman, and Cowart collectively own franchises with respect
to ten restaurants. The franchises were granted on the same terms and conditions
as franchises to non-affiliated persons and these gentlemen paid the same
royalty, advertising and other costs as any other non-affiliated franchisee.
The Company leases chartered air service for corporate usage from time to
time for an airplane owned by the President of the Company. Charges are made on
an hourly rate approximately 80% of the competitive rate for chartered air
service available for non-affiliated vendors. The Company paid $103,000 directly
to the chartered air service during 2001.
The Company leases its headquarters office space from an entity in which
two of Mr. Foti's adult children collectively own a 50% interest. The rental
rate was $3,750 per month through September, 2001 and increased to $6,540 per
month in October, 2001 when an addition to the building was leased to the
Company. The lease was approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board and
the per square foot rental rate is deemed to be comparable and competitive with
similar space in Roanoke.
There are no other affiliated or related transactions between or among the
Company and its Officers and Directors.
The Board of Directors has a policy that all transactions with its
Officers, Directors, employees and affiliates of the Company will be approved by
a majority of disinterested Directors of the Company or a special committee of
the Board of Directors consisting of disinterested persons, and will be on terms
no less favorable to the Company that such Directors or committee believe would
be available from unrelated third parties.
SOLICITATION
Revocations of Consents are being solicited by and on behalf of the Company
by the Board of Directors (except Mr. Proffitt). All expenses of the Company's
solicitation of proxies, including the cost of preparing and mailing this
Revocation of Consent Statement, will be borne by the Company. In addition to
this mailing, Consents may be solicited by advertisement, telephone, telecopier,
and in person. None of the Officers or
-24-
Directors of the Company will receive compensation for soliciting proxies. The
Company has retained MacKenzie Partners, Inc. to assist in the obtaining of
Revocations of Consents. MacKenzie will be paid a fee not to exceed $________
for their services, plus reimbursement for their reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses.
The Company anticipates that its total expenditures relating to the
Company's solicitation (excluding costs representing salaries and wages of
regular employees and officers of the Company) will be approximately
$__________. The Company to date has incurred estimated total expenses of
approximately $75,000.
APPRAISAL RIGHTS
Holders of the Company's Common Stock do not have Dissenters' appraisal
rights under Delaware law in connection matters to be considered in relation to
this solicitation process.
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS
Stockholder proposals that are intended to be presented at the Company's
2003 Annual Meeting of Stockholders must be received by the Company not later
than January 24, 2003, in order to be included in the proxy statement and form
of proxy for that meeting.
QUESTIONS
If you have any questions or require any assistance in executing or
delivering your consent, please call:
Victor F. Foti, President or Robyn B. Mabe, CFO
(540) 345-3195 (540) 345-3195
or or
1-800-642-2157 1-800-642-2157
Dated: September __, 2002
-25-
ANNEX A
INFORMATION CONCERNING THE DIRECTORS AND CERTAIN EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND
EMPLOYEES OF AUSTINS AND OTHER PARTICIPANTS WHO MAY ALSO SOLICIT
REVOCATIONS OF CONSENTS.
In connection with Austins' solicitation of Revocations of Consents from
its stockholders, certain other persons may be deemed to be Participants in the
solicitation.
The following tables set forth the name, principal business address and the
present employment or other principal occupation, and the name, principal
business and the address of any corporation or other organization in which such
employment is carried on, of the Directors and certain executive officers and
employees of Austins and other representatives of Austins who may be deemed to
be Participants in the soliciting of Revocations of Consents.
DIRECTORS OF AUSTINS
The principal occupations of Austins' Directors who are deemed Participants
in the solicitation are set forth in the section entitled "Information About the
Board of Directors of Austins" on pages ____________ to _________ of this
Revocation of Consent Statement. The principal business address of each such
person is set forth in that section.
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND OTHER EMPLOYEES OF AUSTINS
The principal occupations of certain of Austins' executive officers and
certain other members of management who are deemed Participants in the
solicitation are set forth below. The principal occupation refers to such
person's position with Austins and each person's business address is 317 Kimball
Avenue, N.E., Roanoke, Virginia 24016.
NAME PRINCIPAL OCCUPATION
Victor F. Foti President, Chief Executive Officer
Robyn B. Mabe Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer/Corporate Secretary and
Treasurer
-26-
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION CONCERNING PARTICIPANTS
Except as described in this Annex A or in the Revocation of Consent
Statement, none of the persons who may be deemed "Participants" as defined in
Schedule 14A promulgated under the Exchange Act nor any of their respective
affiliates or associates (together, the "Participant Affiliates"), (1) directly
or indirectly beneficially owns any shares of Austins common stock or any
securities of any subsidiary of Austins or (2) has had any relationship with
Austins in any capacity other than as a stockholder, employee, officer or
director. Furthermore, except as described in this Annex A or in the Revocation
of Consent Statement, no Participant Affiliate is either a party to any
transaction or series of transactions since January 1, 2002, or has knowledge of
any currently proposed transaction or series of transactions, (1) to which
Austins or any of its subsidiaries was or is to be a party, (2) in which the
amount involved exceeds $60,000, and (3) in which any Participant Affiliate had,
or will have, a direct or indirect material interest.
Except for the employment agreements described in the Revocation of Consent
Statement or as otherwise described therein or in this Annex A thereto, no
Participant Affiliate has entered into any agreement or understanding with any
person respecting any future employment by Austins or its affiliates or any
future transactions to which Austins or any of its affiliates will or may be a
party. Except as described in this Annex A or in the Revocation of Consent
Statement, there are no contracts, arrangements or understandings by any
Participant Affiliate within the past year with any person with respect to
Austins' securities.
-27-
APPENDIX 1
AUSTINS STEAKS & SALOON, INC.
THIS REVOCATION OF CONSENT IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
AUSTINS STEAKS & SALOON, INC., IN OPPOSITION TO THE DISSIDENTS' CONSENT
SOLICITATION.
The undersigned, a holder of shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share,
of Austins Steaks & Saloon, Inc., is acting with respect to all the shares of
common stock of Austins Steaks & Saloon, Inc., held by the undersigned, and
hereby revokes any and all consents that the undersigned may have given in
respect of the following proposals:
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF AUSTINS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A `REVOKE CONSENT' ON
EACH PROPOSAL SET FORTH BELOW. PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND MAIL THIS REVOCATION OF
CONSENT CARD TODAY. BECAUSE THE ADOPTION OF EACH OF PROPOSAL 1 AND PROPOSAL 2
ARE CONDITIONED UPON ADOPTION OF THE OTHER PROPOSAL, A REVOCATION OF EITHER
PROPOSAL 1 OR PROPOSAL 2 WILL ACT AS A REVOCATION OF BOTH.
1. Remove six of the current eight Austins Directors (all except Paul C.
Schorr, III Roger D. Sack, and William E. Proffitt) and remove any other
Directors elected or appointed to the Austins Board before the effective
time of this stockholder action.
[ ] REVOKE CONSENT [ ] DO NOT REVOKE CONSENT
INSTRUCTIONS: TO REVOKE A CONSENT, WITHHOLD REVOCATION OF CONSENT OR ABSTAIN
FROM VOTING UPON THE REMOVAL OF ALL THE PERSONS NAMED IN THE ABOVE PROPOSAL,
CHECK THE APPROPRIATE BOX. IF YOU WISH TO REVOKE THE CONSENT TO THE REMOVAL OF
CERTAIN OF THE PERSONS NAMED ABOVE, BUT NOT ALL OF THEM, CHECK THE "REVOKE
CONSENT" BOX AND WRITE THE NAME OF EACH SUCH PERSON AS TO WHOM YOU DO NOT WISH
TO REVOKE CONSENT IN THE FOLLOWING SPACE:_______________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________
2. Elect Titus W. Greene, Charles W. Mantooth, Thomas M. Hontzas, Charles H.
Wright, Pat Vezertzis, Jesse M. Harrington, III to replace the six removed
Directors to serve as Directors of Austins until their respective
successors are duly elected and qualified or their earlier resignation or
removal.
[ ] REVOKE CONSENT [ ] DO NOT REVOKE CONSENT
-1-
3. Repeal any amendment to the Company's Bylaws adopted by the current Board
between July 17, 2002 and the date on which this stockholder action becomes
effective.
[ ] REVOKE CONSENT [ ] DO NOT REVOKE CONSENT
INSTRUCTIONS: TO REVOKE A CONSENT, WITHHOLD REVOCATION OF CONSENT OR ABSTAIN
FROM VOTING UPON THE ELECTION OF ALL THE PERSONS NAMED ABOVE, CHECK THE
APPROPRIATE BOX. IF YOU WISH TO REVOKE THE CONSENT TO THE ELECTION OF CERTAIN OF
THE PERSONS NAMED ABOVE, BUT NOT ALL OF THEM, CHECK THE "REVOKE CONSENT" BOX AND
WRITE THE NAME OF EACH SUCH PERSON AS TO WHOM YOU DO NOT WISH TO REVOKE CONSENT
IN THE FOLLOWING SPACE:_________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________
IF NO DIRECTION IS MADE WITH RESPECT TO ONE OR MORE OF THE FOREGOING PROPOSALS,
OR IF YOU MARK EITHER THE "REVOKE CONSENT" OR "ABSTAIN" BOX WITH RESPECT TO ONE
OR MORE OF THE FOREGOING PROPOSALS, THIS REVOCATION CARD WILL REVOKE ALL
PREVIOUSLY EXECUTED PROXIES WITH RESPECT TO SUCH PROPOSALS.
Please sign exactly as name appears hereon. If shares are held jointly,
each stockholder should sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator,
trustee, guardian, corporate officer, etc., give full title as such.
Dated:
----------------------------------
Signature
-------------------------------
----------------------------------------
Signature, if held jointly
----------------------------------------
Title of Authority
-2-
IN ORDER FOR YOUR REVOCATION OF CONSENT TO BE VALID, IT MUST BE DATED.
PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND MAIL YOUR REVOCATION OF CONSENT PROMPTLY IN THE
ENCLOSED POSTAGE-PAID ENVELOPE.
-3-