e10vq
Table of Contents

 
 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
 
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
     
þ   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010
     
o   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                      to                     
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 001-14793
FIRST BANCORP.
(EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)
     
Puerto Rico   66-0561882
(State or other jurisdiction of   (I.R.S. employer
incorporation or organization)   identification number)
     
1519 Ponce de León Avenue, Stop 23    
Santurce, Puerto Rico   00908
(Address of principal executive offices)   (Zip Code) 
(787) 729-8200
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Not applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
             
Large accelerated filer o    Accelerated filer þ    Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
  Smaller reporting company o 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Common stock: 92,542,722 outstanding as of July 31, 2010.
 
 

 


 

FIRST BANCORP.
INDEX PAGE
         
    PAGE
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
       
Item 1. Financial Statements:
       
    5  
    6  
 
       
    7  
    8  
 
    9  
 
    10  
    49  
    98  
    98  
 
       
       
    99  
    99  
    109  
    109  
    109  
    109  
    110  
 
       
       
 EX-12.1
 EX-12.2
 EX-31.1
 EX-31.2
 EX-32.1
 EX-32.2

2


Table of Contents

Forward Looking Statements
     This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. When used in this Form 10-Q or future filings by First BanCorp (the “Corporation”) with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), in the Corporation’s press releases, in other public or stockholder communications, or in oral statements made with the approval of an authorized executive officer, the word or phrases “would be,” “will allow,” “intends to,” “will likely result,” “are expected to,” “should,” “anticipate” and similar expressions are meant to identify “forward-looking statements.”
     First BanCorp wishes to caution readers not to place undue reliance on any such “forward-looking statements,” which speak only as of the date made, and represent First BanCorp’s expectations of future conditions or results and are not guarantees of future performance. First BanCorp advises readers that various factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any “forward-looking statement.” Such factors include, but are not limited to, the following:
    uncertainty about whether the Corporation will be able to fully comply with the written agreement dated June 3, 2010 (the “Agreement”) that the Corporation entered into with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (the “FED”) and the order dated June 2, 2010 (the “Order” and collectively with the Agreement, the “Agreements”) that the Corporation’s banking subsidiary, FirstBank Puerto Rico (“FirstBank” or “the Bank”) entered into with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) and the Office of the Commissioner of Financial Institutions of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (“OCIF”) that, among other things, require the Bank to attain certain capital levels and reduce its special mention, classified, delinquent and non-accrual assets;
 
    uncertainty as to whether the Corporation will be able to meet the conditions necessary to compel the United States Department of the Treasury (the “U.S. Treasury”) to convert into Common Stock the shares of the Corporation’s preferred stock that the Corporation issued to the U.S. Treasury;
 
    uncertainty as to whether the Corporation will be able to complete future capital-raising efforts;
 
    the risk of being subject to possible additional regulatory action, including as a result of an inability to implement the capital plans submitted in accordance with the Agreements;
 
    the strength or weakness of the real estate market and of the consumer and commercial credit sector and their impact on the credit quality of the Corporation’s loans and other assets, including the construction and commercial real estate loan portfolios, which have contributed and may continue to contribute to, among other things, the increase in the levels of non-performing assets, charge-offs and the provision expense;
 
    adverse changes in general economic conditions in the United States and in Puerto Rico, including the interest rate scenario, market liquidity, housing absorption rates, real estate prices and disruptions in the U.S. capital markets, which may reduce interest margins, impact funding sources and affect demand for all of the Corporation’s products and services and the value of the Corporation’s assets;
 
    the Corporation’s reliance on brokered certificates of deposit and its ability to obtain, on a periodic basis, approval to issue brokered certificates of deposit to fund operations and provide liquidity in accordance with the terms of the Order;
 
    an adverse change in the Corporation’s ability to attract new clients and retain existing ones;
 
    a decrease in demand for the Corporation’s products and services and lower revenues and earnings because of the continued recession in Puerto Rico, the recently announced consolidation of the banking industry in Puerto Rico and the current fiscal problems and budget deficit of the Puerto Rico government;
 
    a need to recognize additional impairments of financial instruments or goodwill relating to acquisitions;
 
    uncertainty about regulatory and legislative changes for financial services companies in Puerto Rico, the United States and the U.S. and British Virgin Islands, which could affect the Corporation’s financial performance and could cause the Corporation’s actual results for future periods to differ materially from prior results and anticipated or projected results;
 
    uncertainty about the effectiveness of the various actions undertaken to stimulate the U.S. economy and stabilize the U.S. financial markets, and the impact such actions may have on the Corporation’s business, financial condition and results of operations;

3


Table of Contents

    changes in the fiscal and monetary policies and regulations of the federal government, including those determined by the FED, the FDIC, government-sponsored housing agencies and local regulators in Puerto Rico and the U.S. and British Virgin Islands;
 
    the risk that the FDIC may further increase the deposit insurance premium and/or require special assessments to replenish its insurance fund, causing an additional increase in the Corporation’s non-interest expense;
 
    risks of not being able to generate sufficient income to realize the benefit of the deferred tax asset;
 
    risks of not being able to recover the assets pledged to Lehman Brothers Special Financing, Inc.;
 
    changes in the Corporation’s expenses associated with acquisitions and dispositions;
 
    developments in technology;
 
    the impact of Doral Financial Corporation’s financial condition on the repayment of its outstanding secured loans to the Corporation;
 
    risks associated with further downgrades in the credit ratings of the Corporation’s securities;
 
    general competitive factors and industry consolidation; and
 
    the possible future dilution to holders of the Corporation’s Common Stock resulting from additional issuances of Common Stock or securities convertible into Common Stock.
     The Corporation does not undertake, and specifically disclaims any obligation, to update any of the “forward- looking statements” to reflect occurrences or unanticipated events or circumstances after the date of such statements except as required by the federal securities laws.
     Investors should refer to the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as well as “Part II, Item 1A, Risk Factors,” in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for a discussion of such factors and certain risks and uncertainties to which the Corporation is subject.

4


Table of Contents

FIRST BANCORP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
(Unaudited)
                 
(In thousands, except for share information)   June 30, 2010     December 31, 2009  
ASSETS
               
 
               
Cash and due from banks
  $ 523,047     $ 679,798  
 
           
 
               
Money market investments:
               
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell
    5,066       1,140  
Time deposits with other financial institutions
    1,588       600  
Other short-term investments
    15,390       22,546  
 
           
Total money market investments
    22,044       24,286  
 
           
 
               
Investment securities available for sale, at fair value:
               
Securities pledged that can be repledged
    2,342,398       3,021,028  
Other investment securities
    1,612,512       1,149,754  
 
           
Total investment securities available for sale
    3,954,910       4,170,782  
 
           
 
               
Investment securities held to maturity, at amortized cost:
               
Securities pledged that can be repledged
    333,581       400,925  
Other investment securities
    199,721       200,694  
 
           
Total investment securities held to maturity, fair value of $562,334
(December 31, 2009 — $621,584)
    533,302       601,619  
 
           
 
               
Other equity securities
    69,843       69,930  
 
           
 
               
Loans, net of allowance for loan and lease losses of $604,304
(December 31, 2009 — $528,120)
    11,898,808       13,400,331  
Loans held for sale, at lower of cost or market
    100,626       20,775  
 
           
Total loans, net
    11,999,434       13,421,106  
 
           
 
               
Premises and equipment, net
    207,440       197,965  
Other real estate owned
    72,358       69,304  
Accrued interest receivable on loans and investments
    66,390       79,867  
Due from customers on acceptances
    1,036       954  
Accounts receivable from investment sales
    319,459        
Other assets
    346,760       312,837  
 
           
Total assets
  $ 18,116,023     $ 19,628,448  
 
           
 
               
LIABILITIES
               
 
               
Deposits:
               
Non-interest-bearing deposits
  $ 715,166     $ 697,022  
Interest-bearing deposits
    12,012,409       11,972,025  
 
           
Total deposits
    12,727,575       12,669,047  
 
               
Loans payable
          900,000  
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
    2,584,438       3,076,631  
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB)
    940,440       978,440  
Notes payable (including $10,504 and $13,361 measured at fair value as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively)
    24,059       27,117  
Other borrowings
    231,959       231,959  
Bank acceptances outstanding
    1,036       954  
Accounts payable from investment purchases
    8,475        
Accounts payable and other liabilities
    159,752       145,237  
 
           
Total liabilities
    16,677,734       18,029,385  
 
           
 
               
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
               
 
               
Preferred stock, authorized 50,000,000 shares: issued and outstanding 22,404,000 shares at an aggregate liquidation value of $950,100
    930,830       928,508  
 
           
Common stock, $1 par value, authorized 750,000,000 shares; issued 102,440,522
    102,440       102,440  
Less: Treasury stock (at cost)
    (9,898 )     (9,898 )
 
           
Common stock outstanding, 92,542,722 shares outstanding
    92,542       92,542  
 
           
Additional paid-in capital
    134,270       134,223  
Legal surplus
    299,006       299,006  
(Accumulated deficit) retained earnings
    (81,670 )     118,291  
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax expense of $11,755 (December 31, 2009 — $4,628)
    63,311       26,493  
 
           
Total stockholders’equity
    1,438,289       1,599,063  
 
           
Total liabilities and stockholders’equity
  $ 18,116,023     $ 19,628,448  
 
           
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

5


Table of Contents

FIRST BANCORP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF LOSS
(Unaudited)
                                 
    Quarter Ended     Six-Month Period Ended  
    June 30,     June 30,     June 30,     June 30,  
(In thousands, except per share information)   2010     2009     2010     2009  
Interest income:
                               
Loans
  $ 175,070     $ 185,318     $ 352,503     $ 373,263  
Investment securities
    39,170       67,345       82,289       137,632  
Money market investments
    624       117       1,060       208  
 
                       
Total interest income
    214,864       252,780       435,852       511,103  
 
                       
Interest expense:
                               
Deposits
    63,766       79,458       129,732       174,768  
Loans payable
    1,265       614       3,442       960  
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase
    25,035       29,015       50,317       59,160  
Advances from FHLB
    7,587       8,317       15,281       16,609  
Notes payable and other borrowings
    (1,851 )     4,362       1,155       6,994  
 
                       
Total interest expense
    95,802       121,766       199,927       258,491  
 
                       
Net interest income
    119,062       131,014       235,925       252,612  
 
                       
Provision for loan and lease losses
    146,793       235,152       317,758       294,581  
 
                               
Net interest loss after provision for loan and lease losses
    (27,731 )     (104,138 )     (81,833 )     (41,969 )
 
                               
Non-interest income:
                               
Other service charges on loans
    1,486       1,523       3,242       3,052  
Service charges on deposit accounts
    3,501       3,327       6,969       6,492  
Mortgage banking activities
    2,140       2,373       4,640       3,179  
Net gain on sale of investments
    24,240       10,305       55,604       28,143  
Other-than-temporary impairment losses on investment securities:
                               
Total other-than-temporary impairment losses
    (3 )     (32,541 )     (603 )     (32,929 )
Noncredit-related impairment portion on debt securities not expected to be sold (recognized in other comprehensive income)
          31,480             31,480  
 
                       
Net impairment losses on investment securities
    (3 )     (1,061 )     (603 )     (1,449 )
Rental income
          407             856  
Other non-interest income
    8,161       6,541       14,999       13,195  
 
                       
Total non-interest income
    39,525       23,415       84,851       53,468  
 
                       
Non-interest expenses:
                               
Employees’ compensation and benefits
    30,958       34,472       62,686       68,714  
Occupancy and equipment
    14,451       17,448       29,302       32,222  
Business promotion
    3,340       3,836       5,545       6,952  
Professional fees
    5,604       3,342       10,891       6,528  
Taxes, other than income taxes
    3,817       4,017       7,638       8,018  
Insurance and supervisory fees
    16,606       16,622       35,124       23,294  
Net loss on real estate owned (REO) operations
    10,816       6,626       14,509       12,001  
Other non-interest expenses
    13,019       9,625       24,278       22,787  
 
                       
Total non-interest expenses
    98,611       95,988       189,973       180,516  
 
                       
 
Loss before income taxes
    (86,817 )     (176,711 )     (186,955 )     (169,017 )
 
                               
Income tax (expense) benefit
    (3,823 )     98,053       (10,684 )     112,250  
 
                       
 
Net loss
  $ (90,640 )   $ (78,658 )   $ (197,639 )   $ (56,767 )
 
                       
 
Net loss attributable to common stockholders
  $ (96,810 )   $ (94,825 )   $ (209,961 )   $ (88,051 )
 
                       
 
Net loss per common share:
                               
 
                               
Basic
  $ (1.05 )   $ (1.03 )   $ (2.27 )   $ (0.95 )
 
                       
Diluted
  $ (1.05 )   $ (1.03 )   $ (2.27 )   $ (0.95 )
 
                       
Dividends declared per common share
  $     $ 0.07     $     $ 0.14  
 
                       
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

6


Table of Contents

FIRST BANCORP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
                 
    Six-Month Period Ended  
    June 30,     June 30,  
(In thousands)   2010     2009  
Cash flows from operating activities:
               
Net loss
  $ (197,639 )   $ (56,767 )
 
           
 
               
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
               
Depreciation
    9,863       10,460  
Amortization and impairment of core deposit intangible
    1,297       5,856  
Provision for loan and lease losses
    317,758       294,581  
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)
    5,047       (94,057 )
Stock-based compensation recognized
    47       52  
Gain on sale of investments, net
    (55,604 )     (28,143 )
Other-than-temporary impairments on investment securities
    603       1,449  
Derivatives instruments and hedging activities gain
    (1,676 )     (16,302 )
Net gain on sale of loans and impairments
    (526 )     (3,807 )
Net amortization of premiums and discounts and deferred loan fees and costs
    802       549  
Net increase in mortgage loans held for sale
    (8,845 )     (27,691 )
Amortization of broker placement fees
    10,787       12,146  
Net amortization of premium and discounts on investment securities
    3,293       5,341  
Increase (decrease) in accrued income tax payable
    909       (16,509 )
Decrease in accrued interest receivable
    12,132       19,390  
Decrease in accrued interest payable
    (276 )     (19,193 )
(Increase) Decrease in other assets
    (298 )     17,283  
Increase in other liabilities
    13,727       22,520  
 
           
Total adjustments
    309,040       183,925  
 
           
 
               
Net cash provided by operating activities
    111,401       127,158  
 
           
 
               
Cash flows from investing activities:
               
Principal collected on loans
    2,118,978       1,661,329  
Loans originated
    (1,141,868 )     (1,984,001 )
Purchases of loans
    (87,436 )     (100,697 )
Proceeds from sale of loans
    19,187       4,866  
Proceeds from sale of repossessed assets
    47,440       31,510  
Proceeds from sale of available-for-sale securities
    733,887       791,313  
Purchases of securities available for sale
    (1,921,842 )     (2,627,666 )
Proceeds from principal repayments and maturities of securities held to maturity
    75,054       1,017,001  
Proceeds from principal repayments of securities available for sale
    1,278,313       511,713  
Additions to premises and equipment
    (19,338 )     (24,809 )
Proceeds from sale of other investment securities
    10,668        
Increase in other equity securities
    (163 )     (19,285 )
 
           
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
    1,112,880       (738,726 )
 
           
 
               
Cash flows from financing activities:
               
Net increase (decrease) in deposits
    46,919       (1,015,725 )
Net (decrease) increase in loans payable
    (900,000 )     135,000  
Net (decrease) increase in federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase
    (492,193 )     709,050  
Net FHLB advances (paid) taken
    (38,000 )     265,000  
Dividends paid
          (39,710 )
Issuance of preferred stock and associated warrant
          400,000  
Other financing activities
          8  
 
           
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
    (1,383,274 )     453,623  
 
           
 
               
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
    (158,993 )     (157,945 )
 
               
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
    704,084       405,733  
 
           
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
  $ 545,091     $ 247,788  
 
           
 
               
Cash and cash equivalents include:
               
Cash and due from banks
  $ 523,047     $ 177,963  
Money market instruments
    22,044       69,825  
 
           
 
  $ 545,091     $ 247,788  
 
           
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

7


Table of Contents

FIRST BANCORP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(Unaudited)
                 
    Six-Month Period Ended  
    June 30,     June 30,  
(In thousands)   2010     2009  
Preferred Stock:
               
Balance at beginning of period
  $ 928,508     $ 550,100  
Issuance of preferred stock — Series F
          400,000  
Preferred stock discount — Series F
          (25,820 )
Accretion of preferred stock discount- Series F
    2,322       1,979  
 
           
Balance at end of period
    930,830       926,259  
 
           
 
               
Common Stock outstanding
    92,542       92,546  
 
           
 
               
Additional Paid-In-Capital:
               
Balance at beginning of period
    134,223       108,299  
Issuance of common stock warrants
          25,820  
Stock-based compensation recognized
    47       52  
Other
          8  
 
           
Balance at end of period
    134,270       134,179  
 
           
 
               
Legal Surplus
    299,006       299,006  
 
           
 
               
(Accumulated deficit) Retained Earnings:
               
Balance at beginning of period
    118,291       440,777  
Net loss
    (197,639 )     (56,767 )
Cash dividends declared on common stock
          (12,966 )
Cash dividends declared on preferred stock
          (26,751 )
Accretion of preferred stock discount — Series F
    (2,322 )     (1,979 )
 
           
Balance at end of period
    (81,670 )     342,314  
 
           
 
               
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, net of tax:
               
Balance at beginning of period
    26,493       57,389  
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
    36,818       (11,007 )
 
           
Balance at end of period
    63,311       46,382  
 
           
Total stockholders’equity
  $ 1,438,289     $ 1,840,686  
 
           
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

8


Table of Contents

FIRST BANCORP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
(Unaudited)
                                 
    Quarter Ended     Six-Month Period Ended  
    June 30,     June 30,     June 30,     June 30,  
(In thousands)   2010     2009     2010     2009  
Net loss
  $ (90,640 )   $ (78,658 )   $ (197,639 )   $ (56,767 )
 
                       
 
                               
Unrealized losses on available-for-sale debt securities on which an other-than-temporary impairment has been recognized:
                               
Noncredit-related impairment losses on debt securities not expected to be sold
          (31,480 )           (31,480 )
Reclassification adjustment for other-than-temporary impairment on debt securities included in net income
          1,061             1,061  
 
All other unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities:
                               
All other unrealized holding gains arising during the period
    70,999       6,565       88,528       49,869  
Reclassification adjustments for net gain included in net income
    (24,240 )     (10,305 )     (44,936 )     (28,143 )
Reclassification adjustments for other-than-temporary impairment on equity securities
    3             353       388  
 
                               
Income tax expense related to items of other comprehensive income
    (6,399 )     (2,210 )     (7,127 )     (2,702 )
 
                       
Other comprehensive income (loss) for the period, net of tax
    40,363       (36,369 )     36,818       (11,007 )
 
                       
Total comprehensive loss
  $ (50,277 )   $ (115,027 )   $ (160,821 )   $ (67,774 )
 
                       
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

9


Table of Contents

FIRST BANCORP
PART I —
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
1 — BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
          The Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) have been prepared in conformity with the accounting policies stated in the Corporation’s Audited Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in the financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted from these statements pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC and, accordingly, these financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Audited Consolidated Financial Statements of the Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2009, included in the Corporation’s 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K. All adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of the statement of financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods have been reflected. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
          The results of operations for the quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire year.
Recent Developments
     Effective June 2, 2010, FirstBank, by and through its Board of Directors, entered into a Consent Order with the FDIC and the OCIF, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit 10.1 of the Form 8-K filed by the Corporation on June 4, 2010. This Order provides for various things, including (among other things) the following: (1) within 30 days of entering into the Order, the development by FirstBank of a capital plan to achieve over time a leverage ratio of at least 8%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of at least 10% and a total risk-based capital ratio of at least 12%, (2) the preparation by FirstBank of strategic, liquidity and earnings plans and related projections within certain timetables set forth in the Order and on an ongoing basis, (3) the preparation by FirstBank of plans for reducing criticized assets and delinquent loans within timeframes set forth in the Order, (4) the requirement for First Bank board approval prior to the extension of credit to classified borrowers, (5) certain limitations with respect to brokered deposits, including the need for pre-approval by the FDIC of the issuance of brokered deposits, (6) the establishment by FirstBank of a comprehensive policy and methodology for determining the allowance for loan and lease losses and the review and revision of loan policies, including the non-accrual policy, and (7) the operation by FirstBank under adequate and effective programs of independent loan review and appraisal compliance and under an effective policy for managing sensitivity to interest rate risk. The foregoing summary is not complete and is qualified in all respects by reference to the actual language of the Order. Although all the regulatory capital ratios exceeded the established “well capitalized” levels at June 30, 2010, because of the Order with the FDIC, FirstBank cannot be treated as a “well capitalized” institution under regulatory guidance.
     Effective June 3, 2010, First BanCorp entered into the Agreement with the FED, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit 10.2 of the Form 8-K filed by the Corporation on June 4, 2010. The Agreement provides, among other things, that the holding company must serve as a source of strength to FirstBank, and that, except upon consent of the FED, the holding company may not pay dividends to stockholders or receive dividends from FirstBank, the holding company and its nonbank subsidiaries may not make payments on trust preferred securities or subordinated debt, and the holding company cannot incur, increase or guarantee debt or repurchase any capital securities. The Agreement also requires that the holding company submit a capital plan that reflects sufficient capital, which must be acceptable to the FED, and follow certain guidelines with respect to the appointment or change in responsibilities of senior officers. The foregoing summary is not complete and is qualified in all respects by reference to the actual language of the Agreement.
          The Order imposes no other restrictions on FirstBank’s products or services offered to customers, nor does it impose any type of penalties or fines upon FirstBank or the Corporation. The FDIC has granted FirstBank temporary waivers to enable it to continue accessing the brokered deposit market through September 30, 2010. FirstBank will request approvals for future periods.
          On July 7, 2010, the Corporation entered into an Exchange Agreement (the “Exchange Agreement”) with the U.S. Treasury pursuant to which the U.S. Treasury agreed, subject to the satisfaction or waiver of certain closing conditions, to exchange all 400,000 shares of the Corporation’s Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series F, with a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share (the “Series F Preferred Stock”), beneficially owned and held by the Treasury, for 400,000 shares of a new series of preferred stock, Fixed Rate Cumulative Mandatorily Convertible Preferred Stock, Series G (the “Series G Preferred Stock”), with a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share, plus additional shares of Series G Preferred Stock having a value equal to the accrued and unpaid dividends on the Series F Preferred Stock. The Corporation subsequently completed the transaction with the U.S. Treasury by issuing 424,174 shares of Series G Preferred Stock to the U.S. Treasury in exchange for the Series F Preferred Stock it previously held and

10


Table of Contents

accrued dividends. The Series G Preferred Stock is convertible into approximately 380.2 million shares of the Corporation’s common stock by the Corporation upon the satisfaction of certain conditions and by the U.S. Treasury and successor holders anytime and will be mandatorily converted on the seventh year anniversary at the then market price if it is still outstanding.
Capital and Liquidity
          The Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the discharge of liabilities in the normal course of business for the foreseeable future. Sustained weak economic conditions that have severely affected Puerto Rico and the United States over the last several years have adversely impacted First BanCorp’s results of operations and capital levels. The net loss in 2009, primarily related to credit losses, the valuation allowance on deferred tax assets and an increase in the deposit insurance premium, reduced the Corporation’s capital levels during 2009. The net loss for the six-month period ended June 30, 2010 was primarily driven by credit losses. While regulatory capital ratios were not significantly impacted during the first half of 2010, the tangible common equity ratio, which is an important measure to investors and credit rating agencies, continued to decrease impacted by the net loss for the six-month period ended June 30, 2010. The tangible common equity ratio decreased from 3.20% as of December 31, 2009 to 2.57% as of June 30, 2010. The decrease in regulatory capital ratios during the six-month period ended June 30, 2010 was not significant since the net loss reported for the period was almost entirely offset by a decrease in risk-weighted assets, consistent with the Corporation’s decision to deleverage its balance sheet to preserve its capital position. As of June 30, 2010, the Corporation’s Total and Tier 1 capital ratios were 13.35% and 12.05%, respectively, compared to 13.44% and 12.16% as of December 31, 2009. Although all the regulatory capital ratios exceeded the established “well capitalized” levels at June 30, 2010, due to the Order discussed above, FirstBank cannot be treated as a “well capitalized” institution under regulatory guidance.
          The Corporation submitted capital plans to the FED and the FDIC setting forth how the Corporation and FirstBank plan to improve their capital positions to comply with the above mentioned Agreements over time. Specifically, FirstBank’s Capital Plan details how it will achieve over time a leverage ratio of at least 8%, a Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets ratio of at least 10% and a Total capital to risk-weighted assets ratio of at least 12%.
          The Corporation already announced that it has commenced an offer to exchange (the “Exchange Offer”) up to 256,401,610 newly issued shares of its common stock for any and all of the issued and outstanding shares of Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income Preferred Stock, Series A through E (the “Preferred Stock”). In addition to this exchange offer, the Corporation has been taking steps to implement strategies to increase tangible common equity and regulatory capital through (i) the issuance of approximately $500 million of equity in one or more public or private offerings (a “Capital Raise”), (ii) the conversion into common stock of the shares of Series G Preferred Stock that the Corporation issued to the U.S. Treasury on July 20, 2010 in exchange for the Series F Preferred Stock that the Corporation sold to it on January 16, 2009, and (iii) a rights offering to common stockholders. The Corporation may compel the conversion of the Series G Preferred Stock into common stock only if, among other things, by April 7, 2011, it issues common stock in the Exchange Offer for at least $385 million liquidation preference amount of the Preferred Stock and issues at least $500 million of equity in a Capital Raise. Also, the Corporation has continued to deleverage its balance sheet by reducing amounts of brokered certificates of deposit (“CDs”) and borrowings. Such reductions were partially offset by increases in retail and business deposits when comparing ending balances as of June 30, 2010 to balances as of December 31, 2009. Significant decreases in risk-weighted assets have been achieved mainly through the non-renewal of commercial loans with 100% risk weightings, such as temporary loan facilities to the Puerto Rico government and others, and through the charge-offs of portions of loans deemed uncollectible. Also, a reduced volume of loan originations contributed to partially offset the effect of net losses on capital ratios.
          Inability to complete the above mentioned Exchange Offer could hinder efforts to sell Common Stock in a Capital Raise. If holders of $385 million or approximately 70% of the liquidation preference of the Preferred Stock tender their shares of Preferred Stock in the Exchange Offer, the Corporation raises $500 million of additional capital, and the holders of the Corporation’s Common Stock approve amendments to the Articles of Incorporation, by April 7, 2011, the Corporation will meet the substantive conditions necessary to compel the U.S. Treasury to convert into Common Stock the shares of recently issued Series G Preferred Stock. Completing the Capital Plan initiatives would result in dilution to the Corporation’s current stockholders. If the Corporation needs to continue to recognize significant reserves and cannot complete a Capital Raise, the Corporation and FirstBank may not be able to comply with the minimum capital requirements included in the capital plans required by the Agreements. In that case, the Corporation would implement other capital preservation strategies, including among others, an accelerated deleverage strategy and the divesture of profitable businesses, which could allow us to meet the minimum capital requirements included in the capital plans required by the Agreements. The Corporation anticipates that it will need to continue to dedicate significant resources and efforts to comply with these Agreements, which may increase operational costs or adversely affect the amount of time management has to conduct operations.
          Both the Corporation and the Bank actively manage liquidity and cash flow needs. The Corporation does not have any unsecured debt maturing during the remaining of 2010; additionally, it suspended common and preferred dividends to stockholders effective August 2009. As of June 30, 2010, the holding company had $52.6 million of cash and cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents at the Bank as of June 30, 2010 were approximately $544.8 million. The Bank has $484.4 million in repurchase

11


Table of Contents

agreements maturing over the next year, of which $184.4 million mature in the next 30 days, and $7.2 million in notes that mature prior to June 30, 2011. In addition, it had $7.1 billion in brokered deposits as of June 30, 2010 of which $3.5 billion mature over the next year. Liquidity at the bank level is highly dependent on bank deposits which fund 70.64% of the Bank’s assets (or 31.39% excluding brokered CDs). As of June 30, 2010, the Bank held approximately $1.1 billion of readily pledgeable or saleable investment securities.
          The Corporation’s credit as a long-term issuer is currently rated CCC+ by Standard & Poor’s (“S&P”) and B- by Fitch Ratings Limited (“Fitch”); both with negative outlook. At the FirstBank subsidiary level, long-term issuer rating is currently B3 by Moody’s Investor Service (“Moody’s”), six notches below their definition of investment grade; CCC+ by S&P seven notches below their definition of investment grade, and B- by Fitch, six notches below their definition of investment grade. The outlook on the Bank’s credit ratings from the three rating agencies is negative. During the second quarter of 2010, the Corporation and its subsidiary bank suffered credit rating downgrades from Moody’s (B1 to B3), S&P (B to CCC+), and Fitch (B to B-) rating services. Furthermore, on June 2010, Moody’s and Fitch placed the Corporation on “Credit Watch Negative” and S&P placed a “Negative Outlook”. The Corporation does not have any outstanding debt or derivative agreements that would be affected by the recent credit downgrades. Furthermore, given our non-reliance on corporate debt or other instruments directly linked in terms of pricing or volume to credit ratings, the liquidity of the Corporation so far has also not been affected in any material way by the downgrades. The Corporation’s ability to access new non-deposit funding, however, could be adversely affected by these credit ratings and any additional downgrades.
          Based on current and expected liquidity needs and sources, management expects First BanCorp to be able to meet its obligations for a reasonable period of time. The Corporation has $3.5 billion of brokered CDs maturing within twelve months from June 30, 2010. Management anticipates it will continue to obtain waivers from the restrictions to issue brokered CDs under the Order to meet its obligations and execute its business plans. If unanticipated market factors emerge, or if the Corporation is unable to raise additional capital or complete the identified aforementioned capital preservation initiatives, successfully execute its plans, issue a sufficient amount of brokered deposits or comply with the Order, its banking regulators could take further action, which could include actions that may have a material adverse effect on the Corporation’s business, results of operations and financial position.
Adoption of new accounting requirements and recently issued but not yet effective accounting requirements
          The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) has issued the following accounting pronouncements and guidance relevant to the Corporation’s operations:
          In June 2009, the FASB amended the existing guidance on the accounting for transfers of financial assets, to improve the relevance, representational faithfulness, and comparability of the information that a reporting entity provides in its financial statements about a transfer of financial assets, the effects of a transfer on its financial position, financial performance, and cash flows, and a transferor’s continuing involvement, if any, in transferred financial assets. This guidance is effective as of the beginning of each reporting entity’s first annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual reporting period and for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. Subsequently in December 2009, the FASB amended the existing guidance issued in June 2009. Among the most significant changes and additions to this guidance are changes to the conditions for sales of a financial asset based on whether a transferor and its consolidated affiliates included in the financial statements have surrendered control over the transferred financial asset or third party beneficial interest; and the addition of the term participating interest, which represents a proportionate (pro rata) ownership interest in an entire financial asset. The Corporation adopted the guidance with no material impact on its financial statements.
          In June 2009, the FASB amended the existing guidance on the consolidation of variable interests to improve financial reporting by enterprises involved with variable interest entities and address (i) the effects of the elimination of the qualifying special-purpose entity concept in the accounting for transfer of financial assets guidance, and (ii) constituent concerns about the application of certain key provisions of the guidance, including those in which the accounting and disclosures do not always provide timely and useful information about an enterprise’s involvement in a variable interest entity. This guidance is effective as of the beginning of each reporting entity’s first annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual reporting period, and for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. Subsequently in December 2009, the FASB amended the existing guidance issued in June 2009. Among the most significant changes and additions to the guidance is the replacement of the quantitative based risks and rewards calculation for determining which reporting entity, if any, has a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity with an approach focused on identifying which reporting entity has the power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses of the entity or the right to receive benefits from the entity. The Corporation adopted the guidance with no material impact on its financial statements.
          In January 2010, the FASB updated the Accounting Standards Codification (“Codification”) to provide guidance to improve disclosure requirements related to fair value measurements and require reporting entities to make new disclosures about recurring or nonrecurring fair-value measurements including significant transfers into and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair-value measurements and information on purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements on a gross basis in the reconciliation of Level 3 fair-value measurements.

12


Table of Contents

Currently, entities are only required to disclose activity in Level 3 measurements in the fair-value hierarchy on a net basis. The FASB also clarified existing fair-value measurement disclosure guidance about the level of disaggregation, inputs, and valuation techniques. Entities are required to separately disclose significant transfers into and out of Level 1 and Level 2 measurements in the fair-value hierarchy and the reasons for the transfers. Significance will be determined based on earnings and total assets or total liabilities or, when changes in fair value are recognized in other comprehensive income, based on total equity. A reporting entity must disclose and consistently follow its policy for determining when transfers between levels are recognized. Acceptable methods for determining when to recognize transfers include: (i) actual date of the event or change in circumstances causing the transfer; (ii) beginning of the reporting period; and (iii) end of the reporting period. The guidance requires disclosure of fair-value measurements by “class” instead of “major category.” A class is generally a subset of assets and liabilities within a financial statement line item and is based on the specific nature and risks of the assets and liabilities and their classification in the fair-value hierarchy. When determining classes, reporting entities must also consider the level of disaggregated information required by other applicable GAAP. For fair-value measurements using significant observable inputs (Level 2) or significant unobservable inputs (Level 3), this guidance requires reporting entities to disclose the valuation technique and the inputs used in determining fair value for each class of assets and liabilities. If the valuation technique has changed in the reporting period (e.g., from a market approach to an income approach) or if an additional valuation technique is used, entities are required to disclose the change and the reason for making the change. Except for the detailed Level 3 roll forward disclosures, the guidance is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009 (first quarter of 2010 for public companies with calendar year-ends). The new disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward activity for Level 3 fair value measurements are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2010 (first quarter of 2011 for public companies with calendar year-ends). Early adoption is permitted. In the initial adoption period, entities are not required to include disclosures for previous comparative periods; however, they are required for periods ending after initial adoption. The Corporation adopted the guidance in the first quarter of 2010 and the required disclosures are presented in Note 19 — Fair Value.
          In February 2010, the FASB updated the Codification to provide guidance to improve disclosure requirements related to the recognition and disclosure of subsequent events. The amendment establishes that an entity that either (a) is an SEC filer or (b) is a conduit bond obligor for conduit debt securities that are traded in a public market (a domestic or foreign stock exchange or an over-the-counter market, including local or regional markets) is required to evaluate subsequent events through the date that the financial statements are issued. If an entity meets neither of those criteria, then it should evaluate subsequent events through the date the financial statements are available to be issued. An entity that is an SEC filer is not required to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated. Also, the scope of the reissuance disclosure requirements has been refined to include revised financial statements only. Revised financial statements include financial statements revised either as a result of the correction of an error or retrospective application of U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The guidance in this update was effective on the date of issuance in February. The Corporation has adopted this guidance; refer to Note 24 — Subsequent events.
          In February 2010, the FASB updated the Codification to provide guidance on the deferral of consolidation requirements for a reporting entity’s interest in an entity (1) that has all the attributes of an investment company or (2) for which it is industry practice to apply measurement principles for financial reporting purposes that are consistent with those followed by investment companies. The deferral does not apply in situations in which a reporting entity has the explicit or implicit obligation to fund losses of an entity that could potentially be significant to the entity. The deferral also does not apply to interests in securitization entities, asset-backed financing entities, or entities formerly considered qualifying special purpose entities. In addition, the deferral applies to a reporting entity’s interest in an entity that is required to comply or operate in accordance with requirements similar to those in Rule 2a-7 of the Investment Company Act of 1940 for registered money market funds. An entity that qualifies for the deferral will continue to be assessed under the overall guidance on the consolidation of variable interest entities. The guidance also clarifies that for entities that do not qualify for the deferral, related parties should be considered for determining whether a decision maker or service provider fee represents a variable interest. In addition, the requirements for evaluating whether a decision maker’s or service provider’s fee is a variable interest are modified to clarify the FASB’s intention that a quantitative calculation should not be the sole basis for this evaluation. The guidance was effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after November 15, 2009. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact in the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements.
          In March 2010, the FASB updated the Codification to provide clarification on the scope exception related to embedded credit derivatives related to the transfer of credit risk in the form of subordination of one financial instrument to another. The transfer of credit risk that is only in the form of subordination of one financial instrument to another (thereby redistributing credit risk) is an embedded derivative feature that should not be subject to potential bifurcation and separate accounting. The amendments address how to determine which embedded credit derivative features, including those in collateralized debt obligations and synthetic collateralized debt obligations, are considered to be embedded derivatives that should not be analyzed under this guidance. The Corporation may elect the fair value option for any investment in a beneficial interest in a securitized financial asset. The guidance is effective for the first fiscal quarter beginning after June 15, 2010. The Corporation is currently evaluating the impact, if any, of the adoption of this guidance on its financial statements.
          In April 2010, the FASB updated the codification to provide guidance on the effects of a loan modification when a loan is part of a pool that is accounted for as a single asset. Modifications of loans that are accounted for within a pool do not result in the removal of those loans from the pool even if the modification of those loans would otherwise be considered a troubled debt

13


Table of Contents

restructuring. An entity will continue to be required to consider whether the pool of assets in which the loan is included is impaired if expected cash flows for the pool change. The amendments in this Update are effective for modifications of loans accounted for within pools occurring in the first interim or annual period ending on or after July 15, 2010. The amendments are to be applied prospectively and early application is permitted. The Corporation is currently evaluating the impact, if any, of the adoption of this guidance on its financial statements.
          In July 2010, the FASB updated the codification to expand the disclosure requirements regarding credit quality of financing receivables and the allowance for credit losses. The objectives of the enhanced disclosures are to provide information that will enable readers of financial statements to understand the nature of credit risk in a company’s financing receivables, how that risk is analyzed in determining the related allowance for credit losses and changes to the allowance during the reporting period. An entity should provide disclosures on a disaggregated basis defined as a portfolio segment and class of financing receivable. The amendments in this Update are effective for both interim and annual reporting period ending after December 15, 2010. The Corporation is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this guidance on its financial statements.
     2 — EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
          The calculations of earnings per common share for the quarters and six-month periods ended on June 30, 2010 and 2009 are as follows:
                                 
    Quarter Ended     Six-Month Period Ended  
    June 30,     June 30,     June 30,     June 30,  
    2010     2009     2010     2009  
    (In thousands, except per share information)  
Net Loss:
                               
Net loss
  $ (90,640 )   $ (78,658 )   $ (197,639 )   $ (56,767 )
Less: Preferred stock dividends (1)
    (5,000 )     (15,069 )     (10,000 )     (29,305 )
Less: Preferred stock discount accretion
    (1,170 )     (1,097 )     (2,322 )     (1,979 )
 
                       
Net loss attributable to common stockholders
  $ (96,810 )   $ (94,824 )   $ (209,961 )   $ (88,051 )
 
                       
 
                               
Weighted-Average Shares:
                               
Basic weighted-average common shares outstanding
    92,521       92,511       92,521       92,511  
Average potential common shares
                       
 
                       
Diluted weighted-average number of common shares outstanding
    92,521       92,511       92,521       92,511  
 
                       
 
                               
Loss per common share:
                               
Basic
  $ (1.05 )   $ (1.03 )   $ (2.27 )   $ (0.95 )
Diluted
  $ (1.05 )   $ (1.03 )   $ (2.27 )   $ (0.95 )
 
(1)   Preferred stock dividends for the quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2010 relate to Series F preferred stock cumulative preferred dividends not declared corresponding to such periods while for the quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2009 cumulative dividends not declared on Series F preferred stock and included as preferred stock dividends for purposes of earnings per share calculation, amounted to $2.6 million. Refer to Note 17 and Note 24 for additional information related to the Series F preferred stock issued to the U.S. Treasury in connection with the Troubled Asset Relief Program (“TARP”) Capital Purchase Program.
          (Loss) earnings per common share is computed by dividing net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average common shares issued and outstanding. Net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders represents net (loss) income adjusted for preferred stock dividends including dividends declared, accretion of discount on preferred stock issuances and cumulative dividends related to the current dividend period that have not been declared as of the end of the period. Basic weighted average common shares outstanding exclude unvested shares of restricted stock.
          Potential common shares consist of common stock issuable under the assumed exercise of stock options, unvested shares of restricted stock, and outstanding warrants using the treasury stock method. This method assumes that the potential common shares are issued and the proceeds from the exercise, in addition to the amount of compensation cost attributable to future services, are used to purchase common stock at the exercise date. The difference between the number of potential shares issued and the shares purchased is added as incremental shares to the actual number of shares outstanding to compute diluted earnings per share. Stock options, unvested shares of restricted stock, and outstanding warrants that result in lower potential shares issued than shares purchased under the treasury stock method are not included in the computation of dilutive earnings per share since their inclusion would have an antidilutive effect on earnings per share. For the quarter and six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, there were 2,073,200 and 3,910,910, respectively, outstanding stock options, as well as warrants outstanding to purchase 5,842,259 shares of common stock related to the TARP Capital Purchase Program that were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per common share because the Corporation reported a net loss attributable to common stockholders for the periods and their inclusion would have an antidilutive effect. Approximately 21,477 and 36,243 unvested shares of restricted stock outstanding as of June 30, 2010 and 2009 were excluded from the computation of earnings per share.

14


Table of Contents

3 — STOCK OPTION PLAN
          Between 1997 and January 2007, the Corporation had a stock option plan (“the 1997 stock option plan”) that authorized the granting of up to 8,696,112 options on shares of the Corporation’s common stock to eligible employees. The options granted under the plan could not exceed 20% of the number of common shares outstanding. Each option provides for the purchase of one share of common stock at a price not less than the fair market value of the stock on the date the option was granted. Stock options were fully vested upon grant. The maximum term to exercise the options is ten years. The stock option plan provides for a proportionate adjustment in the exercise price and the number of shares that can be purchased in the event of a stock dividend, stock split, reclassification of stock, merger or reorganization and certain other issuances and distributions such as stock appreciation rights.
          Under the 1997 stock option plan, the Compensation and Benefits Committee (the “Compensation Committee”) had the authority to grant stock appreciation rights at any time subsequent to the grant of an option. Pursuant to stock appreciation rights, the optionee surrenders the right to exercise an option granted under the plan in consideration for payment by the Corporation of an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the shares of common stock subject to such option surrendered over the total option price of such shares. Any option surrendered is cancelled by the Corporation and the shares subject to the option are not eligible for further grants under the option plan. On January 21, 2007, the 1997 stock option plan expired; all outstanding awards granted under this plan continue in full force and effect, subject to their original terms. No awards for shares could be granted under the 1997 stock option plan as of its expiration.
          On April 29, 2008, the Corporation’s stockholders approved the First BanCorp 2008 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Omnibus Plan”). The Omnibus Plan provides for equity-based compensation incentives (the “awards”) through the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares, and other stock-based awards. This plan allows the issuance of up to 3,800,000 shares of common stock, subject to adjustments for stock splits, reorganization and other similar events. The Corporation’s Board of Directors, upon receiving the relevant recommendation of the Compensation Committee, has the power and authority to determine those eligible to receive awards and to establish the terms and conditions of any awards subject to various limits and vesting restrictions that apply to individual and aggregate awards. Shares delivered pursuant to an award may consist, in whole or in part, of authorized and unissued shares of Common Stock or shares of Common Stock acquired by the Corporation. During the fourth quarter of 2008, the Corporation granted 36,243 shares of restricted stock with a fair value of $8.69 under the Omnibus Plan to the Corporation’s independent directors, of which 4,027 were forfeited in the second half of 2009 and 10,739 have vested.
          For the quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2010, the Corporation recognized $23,333 and $46,666, respectively, of stock-based compensation expense related to the aforementioned restricted stock awards. The total unrecognized compensation cost related to the non-vested restricted shares was $167,223 as of June 30, 2010 and is expected to be recognized over the next 1.4 years.
          There were no stock options granted during 2010 and 2009, therefore, no compensation associated with stock options was recorded in those years.
          Stock-based compensation accounting guidance requires the Corporation to develop an estimate of the number of share-based awards which will be forfeited due to employee or director turnover. Quarterly changes in the estimated forfeiture rate may have a significant effect on share-based compensation, as the effect of adjusting the rate for all expense amortization is recognized in the period in which the forfeiture estimate is changed. If the actual forfeiture rate is higher than the estimated forfeiture rate, then an adjustment is made to increase the estimated forfeiture rate, which will result in a decrease to the expense recognized in the financial statements. If the actual forfeiture rate is lower than the estimated forfeiture rate, then an adjustment is made to decrease the estimated forfeiture rate, which will result in an increase to the expense recognized in the financial statements. When unvested options or shares of restricted stock are forfeited, any compensation expense previously recognized on the forfeited awards is reversed in the period of the forfeiture.
The activity of stock options for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 is set forth below:
                                 
    Six month period ended  
    June 30, 2010  
                    Weighted-Average        
                    Remaining     Aggregate  
    Number of     Weighted-Average     Contractual Term     Intrinsic Value  
    Options     Exercise Price     (Years)     (In thousands)  
Beginning of period
    2,481,310     $ 13.46                  
Options cancelled
    (408,110 )     14.61                  
 
                           
End of period outstanding and exercisable
    2,073,200     $ 13.24       4.8     $  
 
                       

15


Table of Contents

No stock options were exercised during the first half of 2010 or 2009.
4 — INVESTMENT SECURITIES
Investment Securities Available for Sale
          The amortized cost, non-credit loss component of other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) on securities recorded in other comprehensive income (“OCI”), gross unrealized gains and losses recorded in OCI, approximate fair value, weighted-average yield and contractual maturities of investment securities available for sale as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 were as follows:
                                                                                                 
    June 30, 2010     December 31, 2009  
            Non-Credit                                             Non-Credit                      
            Loss Component     Gross             Weighted             Loss Component     Gross             Weighted  
    Amortized     of OTTI     Unrealized     Fair     average     Amortized     of OTTI     Unrealized     Fair     average  
    cost     Recorded in OCI     gains     losses     value     yield%     cost     Recorded in OCI     gains     losses     value     yield%  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
U.S. Treasury securities:
                                                                                               
After 1 to 5 years
  $ 599,929     $     $ 8,444     $     $ 608,373       1.34     $     $     $     $     $        
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored agencies:
                                                                                               
After 1 to 5 years
    685,921             4,573               690,494       1.73       1,139,577             5,562             1,145,139       2.12  
Puerto Rico Government obligations:
                                                                                               
Due within one year
    12,032                   30       12,002       1.78       12,016             1       28       11,989       1.82  
After 1 to 5 years
    113,302             411             113,713       5.40       113,232             302       47       113,487       5.40  
After 5 to 10 years
    7,115             344             7,459       5.88       6,992             328       90       7,230       5.88  
After 10 years
    5,164             99             5,263       6.24       3,529             91             3,620       5.42  
 
                                                                       
United States and Puerto Rico Government obligations
    1,423,463             13,871       30       1,437,304       1.90       1,275,346             6,284       165       1,281,465       2.44  
 
                                                                       
Mortgage-backed securities:
                                                                                               
FHLMC certificates:
                                                                                               
Due within one year
    3                         3       4.14                                      
After 1 to 5 years
                                        30                         30       5.54  
After 10 years
    322,882             10,535             333,417       3.94       705,818             18,388       1,987       722,219       4.66  
 
                                                                       
 
    322,885             10,535             333,420       3.94       705,848             18,388       1,987       722,249       4.66  
 
                                                                       
GNMA certificates:
                                                                                               
After 1 to 5 years
    52                         52       6.55       69             3             72       6.56  
After 5 to 10 years
    1,516             85             1,601       4.81       808             39             847       5.47  
After 10 years
    886,183             34,505             920,688       4.51       407,565             10,808       980       417,393       5.12  
 
                                                                       
 
    887,751             34,590             922,341       4.51       408,442             10,850       980       418,312       5.12  
 
                                                                       
FNMA certificates:
                                                                                               
After 5 to 10 years
    88,424             5,161             93,585       4.51       101,781             3,716       91       105,406       4.55  
After 10 years
    921,990             38,188             960,178       4.14       1,374,533             30,629       2,776       1,402,386       4.51  
 
                                                                       
 
    1,010,414             43,349             1,053,763       4.16       1,476,314             34,345       2,867       1,507,792       4.51  
 
                                                                       
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations issued or guaranteed by FHLMC, FNMA and GNMA:
                                                                                               
After 10 years
    125,522             1,598             127,120       1.08       156,086             633       412       156,307       0.99  
 
                                                                       
Other mortgage pass-through trust certificates:
                                                                                               
After 10 years
    109,732       28,875       1             80,858       2.51       117,198       32,846       2             84,354       2.30  
 
                                                                       
Total mortgage-backed securities
    2,456,304       28,875       90,073             2,517,502       4.03       2,863,888       32,846       64,218       6,246       2,889,014       4.35  
 
                                                                       
Equity securities (without contractual maturity) (1)
    77             27             104             427             81       205       303        
 
                                                                       
Total investment securities available for sale
  $ 3,879,844     $ 28,875     $ 103,971     $ 30     $ 3,954,910       3.25     $ 4,139,661     $ 32,846     $ 70,583     $ 6,616     $ 4,170,782       3.76  
 
                                                                       
 
(1)   Represents common shares of other financial institutions in Puerto Rico.
          Maturities of mortgage-backed securities are based on contractual terms assuming no prepayments. Expected maturities of investments might differ from contractual maturities because they may be subject to prepayments and/or call options as was the case with approximately $951 million of investment securities (mainly U.S. agency debt securities) called during 2010. The weighted-average yield on investment securities available for sale is based on amortized cost and, therefore, does not give effect to changes in fair value. The net unrealized gain or loss on securities available for sale and the non-credit loss component of OTTI are presented as part of OCI.

16


Table of Contents

          The following tables show the Corporation’s available-for-sale investments’ fair value and gross unrealized losses, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009. It also includes debt securities for which an OTTI was recognized and only the amount related to a credit loss was recognized in earnings:
                                                 
    As of June 30, 2010  
    Less than 12 months     12 months or more     Total  
            Unrealized             Unrealized             Unrealized  
    Fair Value     Losses     Fair Value     Losses     Fair Value     Losses  
    (In thousands)  
Debt securities
                                               
Puerto Rico Government obligations
  $ 11,952     $ 30     $     $     $ 11,952     $ 30  
Mortgage-backed securities
                                               
GNMA
    52                         52        
Other mortgage pass-through trust certificates
                80,628       28,875       80,628       28,875  
 
                                   
 
  $ 12,004     $ 30     $ 80,628     $ 28,875     $ 92,632     $ 28,905  
 
                                   
                                                 
    As of December 31, 2009  
    Less than 12 months     12 months or more     Total  
            Unrealized             Unrealized             Unrealized  
    Fair Value     Losses     Fair Value     Losses     Fair Value     Losses  
    (In thousands)  
Debt securities
                                               
 
                                               
Puerto Rico Government obligations
  $ 14,760     $ 118     $ 9,113     $ 47     $ 23,873     $ 165  
Mortgage-backed securities
                                               
FHLMC
    236,925       1,987                   236,925       1,987  
GNMA
    72,178       980                   72,178       980  
FNMA
    415,601       2,867                   415,601       2,867  
Collateralized mortgage obligations issued or guaranteed by FHLMC, FNMA and GNMA
    105,075       412                   105,075       412  
Other mortgage pass-through trust certificates
                84,105       32,846       84,105       32,846  
Equity securities
    90       205                   90       205  
 
                                   
 
  $ 844,629     $ 6,569     $ 93,218     $ 32,893     $ 937,847     $ 39,462  
 
                                   

17


Table of Contents

Investments Held to Maturity
     The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, approximate fair value, weighted-average yield and contractual maturities of investment securities held to maturity as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 were as follows:
                                                                                 
    June 30, 2010     December 31, 2009  
            Gross             Weighted             Gross             Weighted  
    Amortized     Unrealized     Fair     average     Amortized     Unrealized     Fair     average  
    cost     gains     losses     value     yield%     cost     gains     losses     value     yield%  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
U.S. Treasury securities:
                                                                               
Due within 1 year
  $ 16,975     $     $ 2     $ 16,973       0.38     $ 8,480     $ 12     $     $ 8,492       0.47  
Puerto Rico Government obligations:
                                                                               
After 5 to 10 years
    18,929       829             19,758       5.86       18,584       564       93       19,055       5.86  
After 10 years
    4,730       80             4,810       5.50       4,995       77             5,072       5.50  
 
                                                           
United States and Puerto Rico Government obligations
    40,634       909       2       41,541       3.53       32,059       653       93       32,619       4.38  
 
                                                           
 
                                                                               
Mortgage-backed securities:
                                                                               
FHLMC certificates:
                                                                               
After 1 to 5 years
    3,691       52             3,743       3.78       5,015       78             5,093       3.79  
FNMA certificates:
                                                                               
After 1 to 5 years
    3,539       67             3,606       3.88       4,771       100             4,871       3.87  
After 5 to 10 years
    459,919       27,673             487,592       4.48       533,593       19,548             553,141       4.47  
After 10 years
    23,519       1,034             24,553       5.31       24,181       479             24,660       5.30  
 
                                                           
Mortgage-backed securities
    490,668       28,826             519,494       4.51       567,560       20,205             587,765       4.49  
 
                                                           
 
                                                                               
Corporate bonds:
                                                                               
After 10 years
    2,000             701       1,299       5.80       2,000             800       1,200       5.80  
 
                                                           
 
                                                                               
Total investment securities held-to-maturity
  $ 533,302     $ 29,735     $ 703     $ 562,334       4.44     $ 601,619     $ 20,858     $ 893     $ 621,584       4.49  
 
                                                           
          Maturities of mortgage-backed securities are based on contractual terms assuming no prepayments. Expected maturities of investments might differ from contractual maturities because they may be subject to prepayments and/or call options.
          The following tables show the Corporation’s held-to-maturity investments’ fair value and gross unrealized losses, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:
                                                 
    As of June 30, 2010  
    Less than 12 months     12 months or more     Total  
            Unrealized             Unrealized             Unrealized  
    Fair Value     Losses     Fair Value     Losses     Fair Value     Losses  
    (In thousands)  
Debt securities
                                               
US Treasury Notes
  $ 8,473     $ 2     $     $     $ 8,473     $ 2  
Corporate bonds
                1,299       701       1,299       701  
 
                                   
 
  $ 8,473     $ 2     $ 1,299     $ 701     $ 9,772     $ 703  
 
                                   
                                                 
    As of December 31, 2009  
    Less than 12 months     12 months or more     Total  
            Unrealized             Unrealized             Unrealized  
    Fair Value     Losses     Fair Value     Losses     Fair Value     Losses  
    (In thousands)  
Debt securities
                                               
Puerto Rico Government obligations
  $     $     $ 4,678     $ 93     $ 4,678     $ 93  
Corporate bonds
                1,200       800       1,200       800  
 
                                   
 
  $     $     $ 5,878     $ 893     $ 5,878     $ 893  
 
                                   

18


Table of Contents

Assessment for OTTI
          On a quarterly basis, the Corporation performs an assessment to determine whether there have been any events or economic circumstances indicating that a security with an unrealized loss has suffered OTTI. A debt security is considered impaired if the fair value is less than its amortized cost basis at the reporting date. The accounting literature requires the Corporation to assess whether the unrealized loss is other-than-temporary.
          Prior to April 1, 2009, unrealized losses that were determined to be temporary were recorded, net of tax, in other comprehensive income for available-for-sale securities, whereas unrealized losses related to held-to-maturity securities determined to be temporary were not recognized. Regardless of whether the security was classified as available for sale or held to maturity, unrealized losses that were determined to be other-than-temporary were recorded through earnings. An unrealized loss was considered other-than-temporary if (i) it was probable that the holder would not collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the debt security, or (ii) the fair value was below the amortized cost of the debt security for a prolonged period of time and the Corporation did not have the positive intent and ability to hold the security until recovery or maturity.
          In April 2009, the FASB amended the OTTI model for debt securities. Under the amended guidance, OTTI losses must be recognized in earnings if an investor has the intent to sell the debt security or it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell the debt security before recovery of its amortized cost basis. However, even if an investor does not expect to sell a debt security, it must evaluate expected cash flows to be received and determine if a credit loss has occurred.
          Under the amended guidance, an unrealized loss is generally deemed to be other-than-temporary and a credit loss is deemed to exist if the present value of the expected future cash flows is less than the amortized cost basis of the debt security. As a result of the Corporation’s adoption of this new guidance, the credit loss component of an OTTI, if any, would be recorded as a separate line item in the accompanying consolidated statements of (loss) income, while the remaining portion of the impairment loss would be recognized in OCI, provided the Corporation does not intend to sell the underlying debt security and it is “more likely than not” that the Corporation will not have to sell the debt security prior to recovery. For the quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2010, there were no credit loss impairment charges in earnings.
          Debt securities issued by U.S. government agencies, government-sponsored entities and the U.S. Treasury accounted for more than 94% of the total available-for-sale and held-to-maturity portfolio as of June 30, 2010 and no credit losses are expected, given the explicit and implicit guarantees provided by the U.S. federal government. The Corporation’s assessment was concentrated mainly on private label MBS of approximately $110 million for which the Corporation evaluates credit losses on a quarterly basis. The Corporation considered the following factors in determining whether a credit loss exists and the period over which the debt security is expected to recover:
The length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than the amortized cost basis.
Changes in the near term prospects of the underlying collateral of a security such as changes in default rates, loss severity given default and significant changes in prepayment assumptions;
The level of cash flows generated from the underlying collateral supporting the principal and interest payments of the debt securities; and
Any adverse change to the credit conditions and liquidity of the issuer, taking into consideration the latest information available about the overall financial condition of the issuer, credit ratings, recent legislation and government actions affecting the issuer’s industry and actions taken by the issuer to deal with the present economic climate.
          No OTTI losses on available-for-sale debt securities were recorded in the first half of 2010. Cumulative unrealized other-than-temporary impairment losses recognized in OCI as of June 30, 2010 amounted to $31.7 million.

19


Table of Contents

          For the second quarter and first half of 2009, the Corporation recorded OTTI losses on available-for-sale debt securities as follows:
         
(In thousands)   Private label MBS  
Total other-than-temporary impairment losses
  $ (32,541 )
Unrealized other-than-temporary impairment losses recognized in OCI (1)
    31,480  
 
     
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings (2)
  $ (1,061 )
 
     
 
(1)   Represents the noncredit component impact of the OTTI on available-for-sale debt securities
 
(2)   Represents the credit component of the OTTI on available-for-sale debt securities
          The following table summarizes the rollforward of credit losses on debt securities held by the Corporation for which a portion of OTTI is recognized in OCI:
         
    Quarter and  
    Six-Month Period Ended  
(In thousands)   June 30, 2009  
Credit losses at the beginning of the period
  $  
Additions:
       
Credit losses related to securities for which an OTTI was not previously recognized
    1,061  
 
     
Ending balance of credit losses on debt securities held for which a portion of an OTTI was recognized in OCI
  $ 1,061  
 
     
          Private label MBS are collateralized by fixed-rate mortgages on single family residential properties in the United States and the interest rate is variable, tied to 3-month LIBOR and limited to the weighted-average coupon of the underlying collateral. The underlying mortgages are fixed-rate single family loans with original high FICO scores (over 700) and moderate original loan-to-value ratios (under 80%), as well as moderate delinquency levels.
          Based on the expected cash flows derived from the model, and since the Corporation does not have the intention to sell the securities and has sufficient capital and liquidity to hold these securities until a recovery of the fair value occurs, no credit losses were reflected in earnings for the period ended June 30, 2010. As a result of the valuation performed as of June 30, 2010, no additional other-than-temporary impairment was recorded for the period. Significant assumptions in the valuation of the private label MBS as of June 30, 2010 were as follow:
                 
    Weighted    
    Average   Range
Discount rate
    15 %     15 %
Prepayment rate
    25 %     20.37% - 44.41 %
Projected Cumulative Loss Rate
    4 %     0.90% - 16.36 %
          For each of the quarter and six-month period ended on June 30, 2010, the Corporation recorded OTTI of approximately $0.4 million on certain equity securities held in its available-for-sale investment portfolio related to financial institutions in Puerto Rico. Management concluded that the declines in value of the securities were other-than-temporary; as such, the cost basis of these securities was written down to the market value as of the date of the analysis and is reflected in earnings as a realized loss.
          Total proceeds from the sale of securities available for sale during the first half of 2010 amounted to approximately $733.9 million, excluding $296.5 million of unsettled securities sold (2009 —$791.3 million).
5 — OTHER EQUITY SECURITIES
          Institutions that are members of the FHLB system are required to maintain a minimum investment in FHLB stock. Such minimum is calculated as a percentage of aggregate outstanding mortgages, and an additional investment is required that is calculated as a percentage of total FHLB advances, letters of credit, and the collateralized portion of interest-rate swaps outstanding. The stock is capital stock issued at $100 par value. Both stock and cash dividends may be received on FHLB stock.
          As of both June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Corporation had investments in FHLB stock with a book value of $68.5 million and $68.4 million, respectively. The net realizable value is a reasonable proxy for the fair value of these instruments.

20


Table of Contents

Dividend income from FHLB stock for the second quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2010 amounted to $0.6 million and $1.4 million, respectively, compared to $0.8 million and $1.1 million, respectively, for the same periods in 2009.
          The FHLB stocks owned by the Corporation are issued by the FHLB of New York and by the FHLB of Atlanta. Both banks are part of the Federal Home Loan Bank System, a national wholesale banking network of 12 regional, stockholder-owned congressionally chartered banks. The Federal Home Loan Banks are all privately capitalized and operated by their member stockholders. The system is supervised by the Federal Housing Finance Agency, which ensures that the Home Loan Banks operate in a financially safe and sound manner, remain adequately capitalized and able to raise funds in the capital markets, and carry out their housing finance mission.
          The Corporation has other equity securities that do not have a readily available fair value. The carrying value of such securities as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was $1.3 million and $1.6 million, respectively. An impairment charge of $0.25 million was recorded in the first quarter of 2010 related to an investment in a failed financial institution in the United States.
          During the first quarter of 2010, the Corporation recognized a $10.7 million gain on the sale of the remaining VISA Class C shares. As of June 30, 2010, the Corporation no longer held any VISA shares.
6 — LOAN PORTFOLIO
The following is a detail of the loan portfolio:
                 
    As of     As of  
    June 30,     December 31,  
    2010     2009  
    (In thousands)  
Residential mortgage loans, mainly secured by first mortgages
  $ 3,482,167     $ 3,595,508  
 
           
 
               
Commercial loans:
               
Construction loans
    1,310,065       1,492,589  
Commercial mortgage loans
    1,665,551       1,693,424  
Commercial and Industrial loans (1)
    3,931,991       4,927,304  
Loans to a local financial institution collateralized by real estate mortgages
    304,170       321,522  
 
           
Commercial loans
    7,211,777       8,434,839  
 
           
 
               
Finance leases
    299,060       318,504  
 
           
 
               
Consumer loans
    1,510,108       1,579,600  
 
           
 
               
Loans receivable
    12,503,112       13,928,451  
 
               
Allowance for loan and lease losses
    (604,304 )     (528,120 )
 
           
 
               
Loans receivable, net
    11,898,808       13,400,331  
 
               
Loans held for sale
    100,626       20,775  
 
           
Total loans
  $ 11,999,434     $ 13,421,106  
 
           
 
1 -   As of June 30, 2010, includes $1.5 billion of commercial loans that are secured by real estate but are not dependent upon the real estate for repayment.
          The Corporation’s primary lending area is Puerto Rico. The Corporation’s Puerto Rico banking subsidiary, FirstBank, also lends in the U.S. and British Virgin Islands markets and in the United States (principally in the state of Florida). Of the total gross loan portfolio, including loans held for sale, of $12.6 billion as of June 30, 2010, approximately 83% has credit risk concentration in Puerto Rico, 8% in the United States and 9% in the Virgin Islands
          As of June 30, 2010, the Corporation had $167.3 million outstanding on credit facilities granted to the Puerto Rico Government and/or its political subdivisions, down from $1.2 billion as of December 31, 2009, and $184.1 million granted to the Virgin Islands government. A substantial portion of these credit facilities are obligations that have a specific source of income or revenues identified for their repayment, such as property taxes collected by the central Government and/or municipalities. Another

21


Table of Contents

portion of these obligations consists of loans to public corporations that obtain revenues from rates charged for services or products, such as electric power and water utilities. Public corporations have varying degrees of independence from the central Government and many receive appropriations or other payments from it. The Corporation also has loans to various municipalities in Puerto Rico for which the good faith, credit and unlimited taxing power of the applicable municipality has been pledged to their repayment.
          The largest loan to one borrower as of June 30, 2010 in the amount of $304.2 million is with one mortgage originator in Puerto Rico, Doral Financial Corporation. This commercial loan is secured by individual real estate loans, mostly 1-4 residential mortgage loans.
7 — ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN AND LEASE LOSSES
The changes in the allowance for loan and lease losses were as follows:
                                 
    Quarter Ended     Six-Month Period Ended  
    June 30,     June 30,  
    2010     2009     2010     2009  
    (In thousands)  
Balance at beginning of period
  $ 575,303     $ 302,531     $ 528,120     $ 281,526  
Provision for loan and lease losses
    146,793       235,152       317,758       294,581  
Charge-offs
    (120,516 )     (131,375 )     (246,822 )     (173,835 )
Recoveries
    2,724       1,438       5,248       5,474  
 
                       
Balance at end of period
  $ 604,304     $ 407,746     $ 604,304     $ 407,746  
 
                       
          The allowance for impaired loans is part of the allowance for loan and lease losses. The allowance for impaired loans covers those loans for which management has determined that it is probable that the debtor will be unable to pay all the amounts due in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement, and does not necessarily represent loans for which the Corporation will incur a loss. As of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, impaired loans and their related allowance were as follows:
                 
    As of     As of  
    June 30,     December 31,  
    2010     2009  
    (In thousands)  
Impaired loans with valuation allowance, net of charge-offs
  $ 1,305,588     $ 1,060,088  
Impaired loans without valuation allowance, net of charge-offs
    565,244       596,176  
 
           
Total impaired loans
  $ 1,870,832     $ 1,656,264  
 
           
 
               
Allowance for impaired loans
  $ 277,642     $ 182,145  
          Interest income of approximately $8.2 million and $15.2 million was recognized on impaired loans for the second quarter and first half of 2010, respectively, compared to $5.4 million and $9.8 million, respectively, for the same periods in 2009. The average recorded investment in impaired loans for the first six-months of 2010 and 2009 was $1.8 billion and $693.4 million, respectively.

22


Table of Contents

The following tables show the activity for impaired loans and the related specific reserve during the first half of 2010:
         
    (In thousands)  
 
     
Impaired Loans:
       
Balance at beginning of year
  $ 1,656,264  
Loans determined impaired during the period
    570,528  
Net charge-offs (1)
    (199,635 )
Loans sold, net of charge-offs of $15.6 million (2)
    (70,749 )
Loans foreclosed, paid in full and partial payments, net of additional disbursements
    (85,576 )
 
     
Balance at end of period
  $ 1,870,832  
 
     
 
(1)   Approximately $94.6 million, or 47%, is related to construction loans. Also, approximately $30.3 million, or 15% related to two commercial loan relationships in Puerto Rico.
 
(2)   Related to one construction loan and two commercial mortgage loans (originally disbursed as condo-conversion) sold in Florida .
         
    (In thousands)  
 
     
Specific Reserve:
       
Balance at beginning of year
  $ 182,145  
Provision for loan losses
    295,132  
Net charge-offs
    (199,635 )
 
     
Balance at end of period
  $ 277,642  
 
     
          The Corporation provides homeownership preservation assistance to its customers through a loss mitigation program in Puerto Rico and through programs sponsored by the Federal Government. Due to the nature of the borrower’s financial condition, restructurings or loan modifications through these program as well as other restructurings of individual commercial, commercial mortgage loans, construction loans and residential mortgages in the U.S. mainland fit the definition of Troubled Debt Restructuring (“TDR”). A restructuring of a debt constitutes a TDR if the creditor for economic or legal reasons related to the debtor’s financial difficulties grants a concession to the debtor that it would not otherwise consider. Modifications involve changes in one or more of the loan terms that bring a defaulted loan current and provide sustainable affordability. Changes may include the refinancing of any past-due amounts, including interest and escrow, the extension of the maturity of the loans and modifications of the loan rate. As of June 30, 2010, the Corporation’s TDR loans amounted to $452.6 million consisting of: $161.2 million of residential mortgage loans, $51.0 million commercial and industrial loans, $100.3 million commercial mortgage loans and $140.0 million of construction loans. Outstanding unfunded loan commitments on TDR loans amounted to $0.4 million as of June 30, 2010.
          Included in the $452.6 million of TDR loans are certain impaired condo-conversion loans restructured into two separate agreements (loan splitting) in the fourth quarter of 2009. Each of these loans was restructured into two notes: one that represents the portion of the loan that is expected to be fully collected along with contractual interest and the second note that represents the portion of the original loan that was charged-off. The restructuring of these loans was made after analyzing the borrowers’ and guarantors’ capacity to service the debt and ability to perform under the modified terms. As part of the renegotiation of the loans, the first note of each loan has been placed on a monthly payment of principal and interest that amortizes the debt over 25 years at a market rate of interest. An interest rate reduction was granted for the second note.
          As of June 30, 2010, the carrying value of the notes that were deemed collectible amounted to $22.1 million. Charge-offs recorded prior to 2010 associated with these loans was $29.7 million. The loans that have been deemed to be collectible continue to be individually evaluated for impairment purposes and a specific reserve of $3.1 million was allocated to these loans as of June 30, 2010.
          As of June 30, 2010, the Corporation maintains a $8.5 million reserve for unfunded loan commitments mainly related to outstanding construction loans commitments in Puerto Rico. The reserve for unfunded loan commitments is an estimate of the losses inherent in off-balance sheet loan commitments at the balance sheet date. It is calculated by multiplying an estimated loss factor by an estimated probability of funding, and then by the period-end amounts for unfunded commitments. The reserve for unfunded loan commitments is included as part of accounts payable and other liabilities in the consolidated statement of financial condition.
8 — DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES
          One of the market risks facing the Corporation is interest rate risk, which includes the risk that changes in interest rates will result in changes in the value of the Corporation’s assets or liabilities and the risk that net interest income from its loan and investment portfolios will be adversely affected by changes in interest rates. The overall objective of the Corporation’s interest rate risk management activities is to reduce the variability of earnings caused by changes in interest rates.
          The Corporation uses various financial instruments, including derivatives, to manage the interest rate risk primarily for protection from rising interest rates in connection with private label MBS.

23


Table of Contents

          The Corporation designates a derivative as a fair value hedge, cash flow hedge or an economic undesignated hedge when it enters into the derivative contract. As of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, all derivatives held by the Corporation were considered economic undesignated hedges. These undesignated hedges are recorded at fair value with the resulting gain or loss recognized in current earnings.
          The following summarizes the principal derivative activities used by the Corporation in managing interest rate risk:
          Interest rate cap agreements — Interest rate cap agreements provide the right to receive cash if a reference interest rate rises above a contractual rate. The value increases as the reference interest rate rises. The Corporation enters into interest rate cap agreements for protection from rising interest rates. Specifically, the interest rate on certain of the Corporation’s commercial loans to other financial institutions is generally a variable rate limited to the weighted-average coupon of the pass-through certificate or referenced residential mortgage collateral, less a contractual servicing fee. During the second quarter of 2010, the counterparty for interest rate caps for certain private label mortgage pass-through securities was taken over by the FDIC, immediately canceling all outstanding commitments, and as a result, interest rate caps with notional amount of $117 million are no longer considered to be derivative financial instruments. The total exposure to fair value as of June 30, 2010 of $3.0 million related to such contract was reclassified to an account receivable.
          Interest rate swaps—Interest rate swap agreements generally involve the exchange of fixed and floating-rate interest payment obligations without the exchange of the underlying notional principal amount. As of June 30, 2010, most of the interest rate swaps outstanding are used for protection against rising interest rates. In the past, interest rate swaps volume was much higher since they were used to convert fixed-rate brokered CDs (liabilities), mainly those with long-term maturities, to a variable rate and mitigate the interest rate risk inherent in variable rate loans. All interest rate swaps related to brokered CDs were called during 2009, in the face of lower interest rate levels, and, as a consequence, the Corporation exercised its call option on the swapped-to-floating brokered CDs. Similar to unrealized gains and losses arising from changes in fair value, net interest settlements on interest rate swaps are recorded as an adjustment to interest income or interest expense depending on whether an asset or liability is being economically hedged.
          Indexed options — Indexed options are generally over-the-counter (OTC) contracts that the Corporation enters into in order to receive the appreciation of a specified Stock Index (e.g., Dow Jones Industrial Composite Stock Index) over a specified period in exchange for a premium paid at the contract’s inception. The option period is determined by the contractual maturity of the notes payable tied to the performance of the Stock Index. The credit risk inherent in these options is the risk that the exchange party may not fulfill its obligation. To satisfy the needs of its customers, the Corporation may enter into non-hedging transactions. On these transactions, generally, the Corporation participates as a buyer in one of the agreements and as a seller in the other agreement under the same terms and conditions.
          In addition, the Corporation enters into certain contracts with embedded derivatives that do not require separate accounting as these are clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics of the host contract. When the embedded derivative possesses economic characteristics that are not clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics of the host contract, it is bifurcated, carried at fair value, and designated as a trading or non-hedging derivative instrument.
The following table summarizes the notional amounts of all derivative instruments as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:
                 
    Notional Amounts  
    As of     As of  
    June 30,     December 31,  
    2010     2009  
    (In thousands)  
Economic undesignated hedges:
               
 
               
Interest rate contracts:
               
Interest rate swap agreements used to hedge loans
  $ 42,020     $ 79,567  
Written interest rate cap agreements
    79,071       102,521  
Purchased interest rate cap agreements (1)
    79,071       228,384  
 
               
Equity contracts:
               
Embedded written options on stock index deposits and notes payable
    53,515       53,515  
Purchased options used to manage exposure to the stock market on embedded stock index options
    53,515       53,515  
 
           
 
  $ 307,192     $ 517,502  
 
           
 
(1)   For June 30, 2010, excludes $117 million of terminated interest rate cap agreements.
     The following table summarizes the fair value of derivative instruments and identifies the location of such derivative instruments in the Statement of Financial Condition as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:

24


Table of Contents

                                                 
    Asset Derivatives     Liability Derivatives  
            June 30,     December 31,             June 30,     December 31,  
    Statement of     2010     2009     Statement of     2010     2009  
    Financial Condition     Fair     Fair     Financial Condition     Fair     Fair  
    Location     Value     Value     Location     Value     Value  
    (In thousands)  
Economic undesignated hedges:
                                               
 
                                               
Interest rate contracts:
                                               
Interest rate swap agreements used to hedge loans
  Other assets   $ 393     $ 319     Accounts payable and other liabilities   $ 5,202     $ 5,068  
Written interest rate cap agreements
  Other assets               Accounts payable and other liabilities     27       201  
Purchased interest rate cap agreements
  Other assets     30       4,423     Accounts payable and other liabilities            
 
                                               
Equity contracts:
                                               
Embedded written options on stock index deposits
  Other assets               Interest-bearing deposits     3       14  
Embedded written options on stock index notes payable
  Other assets               Notes payable     723       1,184  
Purchased options used to manage exposure to the stock market on embedded stock index options
  Other assets     772       1,194     Accounts payable and other liabilities            
 
                                   
 
          $ 1,195     $ 5,936             $ 5,955     $ 6,467  
 
                                   
          The following table summarizes the effect of derivative instruments on the Statement of Loss for the quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2010 and 2009:
                                         
            Unrealized Gain or (Loss)     Unrealized Gain or (Loss)  
    Location of Unrealized Gain or (loss)     Quarter Ended     Six-Month Period Ended  
    Recognized in Income on     June 30,     June 30,  
    Derivatives     2010     2009     2010     2009  
            (In thousands)  
Interest rate contracts:
                                       
Interest rate swap agreements used to hedge:
                                       
Brokered certificates of deposit
  Interest Expense on Deposit   $     $ (877 )   $     $ (5,236 )
Notes payable
  Interest Expense on Notes Payable and Other Borrowings                       3  
Loans
  Interest Income on Loans     (47 )     837       (60 )     1,390  
 
                                       
Written and purchased interest rate cap agreements — mortgage-backed securities
  Interest Income on Investment Securities     (440 )     2,489       (1,137 )     2,706  
Written and purchased interest rate cap agreements — loans
  Interest Income on Loans           139       (34 )     144  
 
                                       
Equity contracts:
                                       
Embedded written options on stock index deposits
  Interest Expense on Deposits           (15 )     (1 )     (82 )
Embedded written options on stock index notes payable
  Interest Expense on Notes Payable and Other Borrowings     81       (53 )     51       (166 )
 
                             
Total (loss) gain on derivatives
          $ (406 )   $ 2,520     $ (1,181 )   $ (1,241 )
 
                             
Derivative instruments, such as interest rate swaps, are subject to market risk. As is the case with investment securities, the market value of derivative instruments is largely a function of the financial market’s expectations regarding the future direction of interest rates. Accordingly, current market values are not necessarily indicative of the future impact of derivative instruments on earnings. This will depend, for the most part, on the shape of the yield curve, the level of interest rates, as well as the expectations for rates in the future. The unrealized gains and losses in the fair value of derivatives that have economically hedged certain callable brokered CDs and medium-term notes are partially offset by unrealized gains and losses on the valuation of such economically hedged liabilities measured at fair value. The Corporation includes the gain or loss on those economically hedged liabilities (brokered CDs and medium-term notes) in the same line item as the offsetting loss or gain on the related derivatives as set forth below:
                                                 
    Quarter ended June 30,
    2010   2009
            Gain / (Loss)                   Gain    
    Gain / (Loss)   on liabilities measured at fair   Net Unrealized   Loss   on liabilities measured at fair   Net Unrealized
(In thousands)   on Derivatives   value   Gain   on Derivatives   value   Gain / (Loss)
Interest expense on Deposits
  $     $     $     $ (892 )   $ 1,555     $ 663  
Interest expense on Notes Payable and Other Borrowings
    81       3,815       3,896       (53 )     (1,679 )     (1,732 )
                                                 
    Six-Month Period ended June 30,
    2010   2009
            Gain / (Loss)                   Gain / (Loss)    
    Gain / (Loss)   on liabilities measured at fair   Net Unrealized   Loss   on liabilities measured at fair   Net Unrealized
(In thousands)   on Derivatives   value   Gain / (Loss)   on Derivatives   value   Gain / (Loss)
Interest expense on Deposits
  $ (1 )   $     $ (1 )     (5,318 )     8,696     $ 3,378  
Interest expense on Notes Payable and Other Borrowings
    51       2,857       2,908       (163 )     (1,424 )     (1,587 )

25


Table of Contents

A summary of interest rate swaps as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 follows:
                 
    As of   As of
    June 30,   December 31,
    2010   2009
    (Dollars in thousands)
Pay fixed/receive floating (generally used to economically hedge loans):
               
Notional amount
  $ 42,020     $ 79,567  
Weighted-average receive rate at period end
    2.24 %     2.15 %
Weighted-average pay rate at period end
    6.84 %     6.52 %
Floating rates range from 167 to 252 basis points over 3-month LIBOR
               
          As of June 30, 2010, the Corporation has not entered into any derivative instrument containing credit-risk-related contingent features.
9 — GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLES
          Goodwill as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 amounted to $28.1 million, recognized as part of “Other Assets”. The Corporation conducted its annual evaluation of goodwill during the fourth quarter of 2009. This evaluation is a two-step process. The Step 1 evaluation of goodwill allocated to the Florida reporting unit, which is one level below the United States business segment, indicated potential impairment of goodwill. The Step 1 fair value for the unit was below the carrying amount of its equity book value as of the December 31, 2009 valuation date, requiring the completion of Step 2. The Step 2 required a valuation of all assets and liabilities of the Florida unit, including any recognized and unrecognized intangible assets, to determine the fair value of net assets. To complete Step 2, the Corporation subtracted from the unit’s Step 1 fair value the determined fair value of the net assets to arrive at the implied fair value of goodwill. The results of the Step 2 analysis indicated that the implied fair value of goodwill exceeded the goodwill carrying value by $107.4 million, resulting in no goodwill impairment. There have been no events related to the Florida reporting unit that could indicate potential goodwill impairment since the date of the last evaluation; therefore, no goodwill impairment evaluation was performed during the first half of 2010. Goodwill and other indefinite life intangibles are reviewed at least annually for impairment. The Corporation understands that it is in its best interest to move the annual evaluation date to an earlier date within the fourth quarter, therefore, the Corporation will evaluate for goodwill impairment as of October 1, 2010. The change in date will provide room improvement to the testing structure and coordination and will be performed in conjunction with the Corporation’s annual budgeting process.
          As of June 30, 2010, the gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization of core deposit intangibles was $41.8 million and $26.5 million, respectively, recognized as part of “Other Assets” in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition (December 31, 2009 — $41.8 million and $25.2 million, respectively). During the quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2010, the amortization expense of core deposit intangibles amounted to $0.6 million and $1.3 million, respectively, compared to $0.9 million and $1.9 million, respectively, for the comparable periods in 2009. As a result of an impairment evaluation of core deposit intangibles, there was an impairment charge of $4.0 million recognized during the first half of 2009 related to core deposits in Florida attributable to decreases in the base of core deposits acquired and recorded as part of other non-interest expenses in the Statement of (Loss) Income.
10 — NON-CONSOLIDATED VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES AND SERVICING ASSETS
          The Corporation transfers residential mortgage loans in sale or securitization transactions in which it has continuing involvement, which includes servicing responsibilities and guarantee arrangements. All such transfers have been accounted for as sales as required by applicable accounting guidance.
          When evaluating transfers and other transactions with variable interest entities for consolidation under the newly adopted guidance, the Corporation first determines if the counterparty is an entity for which a variable interest exists. If no scope exception is applicable and a variable interest exists, the Corporation then evaluates if it is the primary beneficiary of the variable interest entity and whether the entity should be consolidated or not.
          Below is a summary of transfers of financial assets to Variable Interest Entities (“VIEs”) for which the Company has retained some level of continuing involvement:
Ginnie Mae
          The Corporation typically transfers first lien residential mortgage loans in conjunction with Ginnie Mae securitization transactions whereby the loans are exchanged for cash or securities that are readily redeemed for cash proceeds and servicing rights.

26


Table of Contents

The securities issued through these transactions are guaranteed by the issuer and, as such, under seller/servicer agreements the Corporation is required to service the loans in accordance with the issuers’ servicing guidelines and standards. As of June 30, 2010, the Corporation serviced loans securitized through GNMA with principal balance of $381 million.
Trust Preferred Securities
          In 2004, FBP Statutory Trust I, a financing subsidiary of the Corporation, sold to institutional investors $100 million of its variable rate trust preferred securities. The proceeds of the issuance, together with the proceeds of the purchase by the Corporation of $3.1 million of FBP Statutory Trust I variable rate common securities, were used by FBP Statutory Trust I to purchase $103.1 million aggregate principal amount of the Corporation’s Junior Subordinated Deferrable Debentures. Also in 2004, FBP Statutory Trust II, a statutory trust that is wholly-owned by the Corporation, sold to institutional investors $125 million of its variable rate trust preferred securities. The proceeds of the issuance, together with the proceeds of the purchase by the Corporation of $3.9 million of FBP Statutory Trust II variable rate common securities, were used by FBP Statutory Trust II to purchase $128.9 million aggregate principal amount of the Corporation’s Junior Subordinated Deferrable Debentures. The trust preferred debentures are presented in the Corporation’s Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition as Other Borrowings, net of related issuance costs. The variable rate trust preferred securities are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by the Corporation. The $100 million Junior Subordinated Deferrable Debentures issued by the Corporation in April 2004 and the $125 million issued in September 2004 mature on September 17, 2034 and September 20, 2034, respectively; however, under certain circumstances, the maturity of Junior Subordinated Debentures may be shortened (such shortening would result in a mandatory redemption of the variable rate trust preferred securities). The trust preferred securities, subject to certain limitations, presently qualify as Tier I regulatory capital under current Federal Reserve rules and regulations. The Collins Amendment to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act eliminates certain trust preferred securities from Tier I Capital. TARP preferred securities are excepted from this treatment. These “regulatory capital deductions” for trust preferred securities are to be phases in incrementally over a period of 3 years beginning on January 1, 2013.
Grantor Trusts
          During 2004 and 2005, a third party to the Corporation, from now on identified as the seller, established a series of statutory trusts to effect the securitization of mortgage loans and the sale of trust certificates. The seller initially provided the servicing for a fee, which is senior to the obligations to pay trust certificate holders. The seller then entered into a sales agreement through which it sold and issued the trust certificates in favor of the Corporation’s banking subsidiary. Currently the Bank is the 100% owner of the trust certificates; the servicing of the underlying residential mortgages that generate the principal and interest cash flows, is performed by the seller, which receives a fee compensation for services provided, the servicing fee. The securities are variable rate securities tied to LIBOR index plus a spread. The principal payments from the underlying loans are remitted to a paying agent (the seller) who then remits interest to the Bank; interest income is shared to a certain extent with a third party financial institution that has an interest only strip (“IO”) tied to the cash flows of the underlying loans, whereas it is entitled to received the excess of the interest income less a servicing fee over the variable rate income that the Bank earns on the securities. This IO is limited to the weighted average coupon of the securities. No recourse agreement exists and the risk from losses on non accruing loans and repossessed collateral is absorbed by the Bank as the 100% holder of the certificates. As of June 30, 2010, the outstanding balance of Grantor Trusts amounted to $109.5 million with a weighted average yield of 2.51%.
Servicing Assets
          The Corporation is actively involved in the securitization of pools of FHA-insured and VA-guaranteed mortgages for issuance of GNMA mortgage-backed securities. Also, certain conventional conforming-loans are sold to FNMA or FHLMC with servicing retained. The Corporation recognizes as separate assets the rights to service loans for others, whether those servicing assets are originated or purchased.

27


Table of Contents

The changes in servicing assets are shown below:
                                 
    Quarter ended     Six-month period ended  
    June 30,     June 30,     June 30,     June 30,  
    2010     2009     2010     2009  
    (In thousands)  
Balance at beginning of period
  $ 12,594     $ 8,738     $ 11,902     $ 8,151  
Capitalization of servicing assets
    1,377       2,039       3,063       3,181  
Amortization
    (497 )     (629 )     (932 )     (1,184 )
Adjustment to servicing assets for loans repurchased (1)
    (139 )           (698 )      
 
                       
Balance before valuation allowance at end of period
    13,335       10,148       13,335       10,148  
Valuation allowance for temporary impairment
    (282 )     (1,796 )     (282 )     (1,796 )
 
                       
Balance at end of period
  $ 13,053     $ 8,352     $ 13,053     $ 8,352  
 
                       
 
(1)   Amount represents the adjustment to fair value related to the repurchase of $13.9 million and $67.4 million for the quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2010, respectively, in principal balance of loans serviced for others.
          Impairment charges are recognized through a valuation allowance for each individual stratum of servicing assets. The valuation allowance is adjusted to reflect the amount, if any, by which the cost basis of the servicing asset for a given stratum of loans being serviced exceeds its fair value. Any fair value in excess of the cost basis of the servicing asset for a given stratum is not recognized. Other-than-temporary impairments, if any, are recognized as a direct write-down of the servicing assets.
Changes in the impairment allowance were as follows:
                                 
    Quarter ended     Six-month period ended  
    June 30,     June 30,     June 30,     June 30,  
    2010     2009     2010     2009  
    (In thousands)  
Balance at beginning of period
  $ 180     $ 1,504     $ 745     $ 751  
Temporary impairment charges
    216       795       352       2,145  
Recoveries
    (114 )     (503 )     (815 )     (1,100 )
 
                       
Balance at end of period
  $ 282     $ 1,796     $ 282     $ 1,796  
 
                       
The components of net servicing income are shown below:
                                 
    Quarter ended     Six-month period ended  
    June 30,     June 30,     June 30,     June 30,  
    2010     2009     2010     2009  
    (In thousands)  
Servicing fees
  $ 1,008     $ 693     $ 1,936     $ 1,344  
Late charges and prepayment penalties
    207       173       321       481  
Adjustment for loans repurchased
    (140           (698 )      
 
                       
Servicing income, gross
    1,075       866       1,559       1,825  
Recovery (amortization and impairment) of servicing assets
    (599     (921 )     (469 )     (2,229 )
 
                       
Servicing income (loss), net
  $ 476     $ (55 )   $ 1,090     $ (404 )
 
                       

28


Table of Contents

          The Corporation’s servicing assets are subject to prepayment and interest rate risks. Key economic assumptions used in determining the fair value at the time of sale ranged as follows:
                 
    Maximum   Minimum
Six-month period ended June 30, 2010:
               
Constant prepayment rate:
               
Government guaranteed mortgage loans
    12.7 %     11.3 %
Conventional conforming mortgage loans
    16.2 %     14.8 %
Conventional non-conforming mortgage loans
    13.4 %     11.5 %
Discount rate:
               
Government guaranteed mortgage loans
    11.6 %     10.3 %
Conventional conforming mortgage loans
    9.3 %     9.2 %
Conventional non-conforming mortgage loans
    13.1 %     13.1 %
 
               
Six-month period ended June 30, 2009:
               
Constant prepayment rate:
               
Government guaranteed mortgage loans
    24.8 %     22.9 %
Conventional conforming mortgage loans
    21.9 %     20.4 %
Conventional non-conforming mortgage loans
    20.1 %     18.5 %
Discount rate:
               
Government guaranteed mortgage loans
    12.9 %     11.8 %
Conventional conforming mortgage loans
    9.3 %     9.2 %
Conventional non-conforming mortgage loans
    13.2 %     13.2 %
          At June 30, 2010, fair values of the Corporation’s servicing assets were based on a valuation model that incorporates market driven assumptions, adjusted by the particular characteristics of the Corporation’s servicing portfolio, regarding discount rates and mortgage prepayment rates. The weighted-averages of the key economic assumptions used by the Corporation in its valuation model and the sensitivity of the current fair value to immediate 10 percent and 20 percent adverse changes in those assumptions for mortgage loans at June 30, 2010, were as follows:
         
    (Dollars in thousands)
Carrying amount of servicing assets
  $ 13,053  
Fair value
  $ 14,456  
Weighted-average expected life (in years)
    7.57  
 
       
Constant prepayment rate (weighted-average annual rate)
    14.06 %
Decrease in fair value due to 10% adverse change
  $ 160  
Decrease in fair value due to 20% adverse change
  $ 827  
 
       
Discount rate (weighted-average annual rate)
    10.46 %
Decrease in fair value due to 10% adverse change
  $ 551  
Decrease in fair value due to 20% adverse change
  $ 1,062  
          These sensitivities are hypothetical and should be used with caution. As the figures indicate, changes in fair value based on a 10 percent variation in assumptions generally cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in assumption to the change in fair value may not be linear. Also, in this table, the effect of a variation in a particular assumption on the fair value of the servicing asset is calculated without changing any other assumption; in reality, changes in one factor may result in changes in another (for example, increases in market interest rates may result in lower prepayments), which may magnify or counteract the sensitivities.

29


Table of Contents

11 — DEPOSITS
The following table summarizes deposit balances:
                 
    June 30,     December 31,  
    2010     2009  
    (In thousands)  
Type of account and interest rate:
               
Non-interest bearing checking accounts
  $ 715,166     $ 697,022  
Savings accounts
    1,935,815       1,761,646  
Interest-bearing checking accounts
    1,108,032       998,097  
Certificates of deposit
    1,862,719       1,650,866  
Brokered certificates of deposit
    7,105,843       7,561,416  
 
           
 
  $ 12,727,575     $ 12,669,047  
 
           
          Brokered CDs mature as follows:
         
    June 30,  
    2010  
    (In thousands)  
One to ninety days
  $ 1,022,928  
Over ninety days to one year
    2,489,688  
One to three years
    3,271,217  
Three to five years
    310,717  
Over five years
    11,293  
 
     
Total
  $ 7,105,843  
 
     
          The following are the components of interest expense on deposits:
                                 
    Quarter Ended     Six-Month Period Ended  
    June 30,     June 30,     June 30,     June 30,  
    2010     2009     2010     2009  
    (In thosands)     (In thosands)  
Interest expense on deposits
  $ 58,444     $ 75,058     $ 118,944     $ 166,000  
Amortization of broker placement fees
    5,322       5,063       10,787       12,146  
 
                       
Interest expense on deposits excluding net unrealized (gain) loss on derivatives and brokered CDs measured at fair value
    63,766       80,121       129,731       178,146  
 
                               
Net unrealized (gain) loss on derivatives and brokered CDs measured at fair value
          (663 )     1       (3,378 )
 
                       
Total interest expense on deposits
  $ 63,766     $ 79,458     $ 129,732     $ 174,768  
 
                       
          The interest expense on deposits includes the valuation to market of interest rate swaps that economically hedged brokered CDs, the related interest exchanged, the amortization of broker placement fees related to brokered CDs not measured at fair value and changes in fair value of callable brokered CDs measured at fair value.
          Total interest expense on deposits includes net cash settlements on interest rate swaps that economically hedged brokered CDs and that, for the quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2009, amounted to net interest realized of $0.8 million and $5.5 million, respectively. No amount was recognized for the first half of 2010 since all interest rate swaps related to brokered CD’s were called in 2009.
12 — LOANS PAYABLE
          Loans payable consisted of short-term borrowings under the FED Discount Window Program. During the second quarter of 2010, the Corporation repaid the remaining balance under the Discount Window. As the capital markets recovered from the crisis witnessed in 2009, the FED gradually reversed its stance back to lender of last resort. Advances from the Discount Window are once again discouraged, and as such, the Corporation no longer plans to use FED Advances for regular funding needs.

30


Table of Contents

13 — SECURITIES SOLD UNDER AGREEMENTS TO REPURCHASE
          Securities sold under agreements to repurchase (repurchase agreements) consist of the following:
                 
    June 30,     December 31,  
    2010     2009  
    (In thousands)  
Repurchase agreements, interest ranging from 0.30% to 5.39% (2009 — 0.23% to 5.39%)
  $ 2,584,438     $ 3,076,631  
 
           
Repurchase agreements mature as follows:
         
    June 30,  
    2010  
    (In thousands)  
One to thirty days
  $ 184,438  
Over ninety days to one year
    300,000  
One to three years
    1,300,000  
Three to five years
    800,000  
 
     
Total
  $ 2,584,438  
 
     
As of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the securities underlying such agreements were delivered to the dealers with whom the repurchase agreements were transacted.
Repurchase agreements as of June 30, 2010, grouped by counterparty, were as follows:
                 
            Weighted-Average  
Counterparty   Amount     Maturity (In Months)  
Credit Suisse First Boston
  $ 884,438       23  
Citigroup Global Markets
    600,000       32  
Barclays Capital
    500,000       18  
Dean Witter / Morgan Stanley
    200,000       37  
JP Morgan Chase
    300,000       35  
UBS Financial Services, Inc.
    100,000       25  
 
             
 
  $ 2,584,438          
 
             
14 — ADVANCES FROM THE FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK (FHLB)
Following is a summary of the advances from the FHLB:
                 
    June 30,     December 31,  
    2010     2009  
    (In thousands)  
Fixed-rate advances from FHLB, with a weighted-average interest rate of 3.18% (2009 — 3.21%)
  $ 940,440     $ 978,440  
 
           

31


Table of Contents

Advances from FHLB mature as follows:
         
    June 30,  
    2010  
    (In thousands)  
One to thirty days
  $ 105,000  
Over ninety days to one year
    315,000  
One to three years
    462,000  
Three to five years
    58,440  
 
     
Total
  $ 940,440  
 
     
          As of June 30, 2010, the Corporation had additional capacity of approximately $242.4 million on this credit facility based on collateral pledged at the FHLB, including haircuts reflecting the perceived risk associated with holding the collateral.
15 — NOTES PAYABLE
Notes payable consist of:
                 
    June 30,     December 31,  
    2010     2009  
    (In thousands)  
Callable step-rate notes, bearing step increasing interest from 5.00% to 7.00% (5.50% as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009) maturing on October 18, 2019, measured at fair value
  $ 10,504     $ 13,361  
 
               
Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) linked principal protected notes:
               
 
               
Series A maturing on February 28, 2012
    6,403       6,542  
 
               
Series B maturing on May 27, 2011
    7,152       7,214  
 
           
Total
  $ 24,059     $ 27,117  
 
           
16 — OTHER BORROWINGS
Other borrowings consist of:
                 
    June 30,     December 31,  
    2010     2009  
    (In thousands)  
Junior subordinated debentures due in 2034, interest-bearing at a floating-rate of 2.75% over 3-month LIBOR (3.29% as of June 30, 2010 and 3.00% as of December 31, 2009)
  $ 103,093     $ 103,093  
 
               
Junior subordinated debentures due in 2034, interest-bearing at a floating-rate of 2.50% over 3-month LIBOR (3.04% as of June 30, 2010 and 2.75% as of December 31, 2009)
    128,866       128,866  
 
           
Total
  $ 231,959     $ 231,959  
 
           

32


Table of Contents

17 — STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Common stock
          As of June 30, 2010, the Corporation had 750,000,000 authorized shares of common stock with a par value of $1 per share. As of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, there were 102,440,522 shares issued and 92,542,722 shares outstanding. In February 2009, the Corporation’s Board of Directors declared a first quarter cash dividend of $0.07 per common share which was paid on March 31, 2009 to common stockholders of record on March 15, 2009 and in May 2009 declared a second quarter dividend of $0.07 per common share which was paid on June 30, 2009 to common stockholders of record on June 15, 2009. On July 30, 2009, the Corporation announced the suspension of common and preferred dividends effective with the preferred dividend for the month of August 2009.
          On April 27, 2010, the Corporation’s stockholders approved an increase in the Corporation’s authorized shares of common stock from 250 million to 750 million. Subsequently, the Corporation commenced the Exchange Offer to issue 256,401,610 shares of common stock in exchange for the Corporation’s outstanding Preferred Stock and issued shares of Series G Preferred Stock in exchange for Series F Preferred Stock, as discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements. The Corporation additionally plans to seek to raise $500 million in a Capital Raise. If the Capital Raise is successful, the Corporation also expects to offer the current stockholders the opportunity to buy one share of common stock for each share of common stock they own at the purchase price set forth in the Capital Raise. The Corporation estimates that it would issue an additional 1.43 billion shares after the completion of the Exchange Offer as a result of conversion of the Series G Preferred Stock, the Capital Raise and the issuance of shares to Bank of Nova Scotia (“BNS”) in accordance with its anti-dilution right in the Stockholder Agreement executed when BNS bought its approximately 10% of the common stock. The estimate is based on a sale in a Capital Raise of $500 million at an assumed per share price of $0.57, the market price of the Corporation’s common stock on July 14, 2010, and a sale to BNS of the maximum number of shares it could buy upon exercise of its anti-dilution right. Given these assumptions, the Corporation will need additional authorized shares. Accordingly, the Corporation’s Board of Directors has proposed to increase the number of authorized shares of the Corporation’s common stock from 750 million to 2 billion. The Corporation believes that this increase will enable it to complete the transactions described above. A Special Meeting has been scheduled for August 26, 2010 to vote on this and other matters. Refer to Note 24 for additional information regarding capital transactions occurring after June 30, 2010.
Stock repurchase plan and treasury stock
          The Corporation has a stock repurchase program under which from time to time it repurchases shares of common stock in the open market and holds them as treasury stock. No shares of common stock were repurchased during 2010 and 2009 by the Corporation. As of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, of the total amount of common stock repurchased in prior years, 9,897,800 shares were held as treasury stock and were available for general corporate purposes.
Preferred stock
          The Corporation has 50,000,000 authorized shares of preferred stock with a par value of $1, redeemable at the Corporation’s option subject to certain terms. This stock may be issued in series and the shares of each series shall have such rights and preferences as shall be fixed by the Board of Directors when authorizing the issuance of that particular series. As of June 30, 2010, the Corporation has five outstanding series of non-convertible non-cumulative preferred stock which trade on the NYSE: 7.125% non-cumulative perpetual monthly income preferred stock, Series A; 8.35% non-cumulative perpetual monthly income preferred stock, Series B; 7.40% noncumulative perpetual monthly income preferred stock, Series C; 7.25% non-cumulative perpetual monthly income preferred stock, Series D; and 7.00% non-cumulative perpetual monthly income preferred stock, Series E. The liquidation value per share is $25. Annual dividends of $1.75 per share (Series E), $1.8125 per share (Series D), $1.85 per share (Series C), $2.0875 per share (Series B) and $1.78125 per share (Series A) are payable monthly, if declared by the Board of Directors. Dividends declared on the non-convertible non-cumulative preferred stock for the first half of 2009 amounted to $20.1 million; consistent with the Corporation’s announcement in July 2009, no dividends have been declared for the six-month period ended June 30, 2010.
          In January 2009, in connection with the TARP Capital Purchase Program, established as part of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, the Corporation issued to the U.S. Treasury 400,000 shares of its Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series F, $1,000 liquidation preference value per share. On July 20, 2010, pursuant to the Exchange Agreement executed with the U.S. Treasury on July 7, 2010, the Corporation issued Series G Preferred Stock in exchange for the Series F Preferred Stock, which as discussed earlier, is convertible into common stock subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions. In connection with the Exchange Agreement, the Corporation also issued to the U.S. Treasury an amended 10-year warrant (the “Warrant”) to purchase 5,842,259 shares of the Corporation’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.7252 per share instead of the exercise price on the original warrant of $10.27 per share. As of June 30, 2010 the Corporation registered the Series F Preferred Stock, the Warrant and the shares of common stock underlying the Warrant for sale under the Securities Act of 1933. The Corporation recorded the total $400 million of the Series F Preferred Stock and the original Warrant at their relative fair values of $374.2 million and $25.8 million, respectively. The Series F Preferred Stock was valued using a discounted cash flow analysis and applying a discount rate of 10.9%. The difference from the par amount of the Series F Preferred Stock is accreted to preferred stock over five years using the interest method with a corresponding adjustment to preferred dividends. The Cox-

33


Table of Contents

Rubinstein binomial model was used to estimate the value of the Warrant with a strike price calculated, pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement with the U.S. Treasury, based on the average closing prices of the common stock on the 20 trading days ending the last day prior to the date of approval to participate in the Program. No credit risk was assumed given the Corporation’s availability of authorized, but unissued common shares, as well as its intention of reserving sufficient shares to satisfy the exercise of the warrants. The volatility parameter input was the historical 5-year common stock price volatility.
          Like the Series F Preferred Stock, the Series G Preferred Stock, qualifies as Tier 1 regulatory capital. Cumulative dividends on the Series G Preferred Stock accrue on the liquidation preference amount on a quarterly basis at a rate of 5% per annum for the first five years, and thereafter at a rate of 9% per annum, but will only be paid when, as and if declared by the Corporation’s Board of Directors out of assets legally available therefore. The Series G Preferred Stock ranks pari passu with the Corporation’s existing Series A through E, in terms of dividend payments and distributions upon liquidation, dissolution and winding up of the Corporation. The Purchase Agreement relating to this issuance contains limitations on the payment of dividends on common stock, including limiting regular quarterly cash dividends to an amount not exceeding the last quarterly cash dividend paid per share, or the amount publicly announced (if lower), of common stock prior to October 14, 2008, which is $0.07 per share. As of June 30, 2010, cumulative preferred dividends not declared on the Series F Preferred Stock amounted to $22.6 million, including $10.0 million corresponding to the first half of 2010, which were exchanged for shares of Series G Preferred Stock in July 2010.
          The Warrant has a 10-year term and is exercisable at any time. The exercise price and the number of shares issuable upon exercise of the Warrant are subject to certain anti-dilution adjustments.
          The possible future issuance of equity securities through the exercise of the Warrant could affect the Corporation’s current stockholders in a number of ways, including by:
diluting the voting power of the current holders of common stock (the shares underlying the warrant represent approximately 6% of the Corporation’s shares of common stock as of June 30, 2010);
diluting the earnings per share and book value per share of the outstanding shares of common stock; and
making the payment of dividends on common stock more expensive.
          As mentioned above, on July 30, 2009, the Corporation announced the suspension of dividends for common and all its outstanding series of preferred stock. This suspension was effective with the dividends for the month of August 2009, on the Corporation’s five outstanding series of non-cumulative preferred stock and dividends for the Corporation’s outstanding Series F Cumulative Preferred Stock and the Corporation’s common stock. As a result of the dividend suspension, the terms of the Series F Cumulative Preferred Stock include limitations on the resumption of the payment of cash dividends and purchases of outstanding shares of common and preferred stock.
18 — INCOME TAXES
          Income tax expense includes Puerto Rico and Virgin Islands income taxes as well as applicable U.S. federal and state taxes. The Corporation is subject to Puerto Rico income tax on its income from all sources. As a Puerto Rico corporation, First BanCorp is treated as a foreign corporation for U.S. income tax purposes and is generally subject to United States income tax only on its income from sources within the United States or income effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business within the United States. Any such tax paid is creditable, within certain conditions and limitations, against the Corporation’s Puerto Rico tax liability. The Corporation is also subject to U.S.Virgin Islands taxes on its income from sources within that jurisdiction. Any such tax paid is also creditable against the Corporation’s Puerto Rico tax liability, subject to certain conditions and limitations.
          Under the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code of 1994, as amended (the “PR Code”), the Corporation and its subsidiaries are treated as separate taxable entities and are not entitled to file consolidated tax returns and, thus, the Corporation is not able to utilize losses from one subsidiary to offset gains in another subsidiary. Accordingly, in order to obtain a tax benefit from a net operating loss, a particular subsidiary must be able to demonstrate sufficient taxable income within the applicable carry forward period (7 years under the PR Code). The PR Code provides a dividend received deduction of 100% on dividends received from “controlled” subsidiaries subject to taxation in Puerto Rico and 85% on dividends received from other taxable domestic corporations. Dividend payments from a U.S. subsidiary to the Corporation are subject to a 10% withholding tax based on the provisions of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code. Under the PR Code, First BanCorp is subject to a maximum statutory tax rate of 39%. In 2009, the Puerto Rico Government approved Act No. 7 (the “Act”), to stimulate Puerto Rico’s economy and to reduce the Puerto Rico Government’s fiscal deficit. The Act imposes a series of temporary and permanent measures, including the imposition of a 5% surtax over the total income tax determined, which is applicable to corporations, among others, whose combined income exceeds $100,000, effectively resulting in an increase in the maximum statutory tax rate from 39% to 40.95% and an increase in the capital gain statutory tax rate from 15% to 15.75%. This temporary measure is effective for tax years that commenced after December 31, 2008 and before January 1, 2012. The PR Code also includes an alternative minimum tax of 22% that applies if the Corporation’s regular income tax liability is less than the alternative minimum tax requirements.

34


Table of Contents

          The Corporation has maintained an effective tax rate lower than the maximum statutory rate mainly by investing in government obligations and mortgage-backed securities exempt from U.S. and Puerto Rico income taxes and by doing business through International Banking Entities (“IBEs”) of the the Corporation and the Bank and through the Bank’s subsidiary, FirstBank Overseas Corporation, in which the interest income and gain on sales is exempt from Puerto Rico and U.S. income taxation. Under the Act, all IBEs are subject to the special 5% tax on their net income not otherwise subject to tax pursuant to the PR Code. This temporary measure is also effective for tax years that commenced after December 31, 2008 and before January 1, 2012. The IBEs and FirstBank Overseas Corporation were created under the International Banking Entity Act of Puerto Rico, which provides for total Puerto Rico tax exemption on net income derived by IBEs operating in Puerto Rico. IBEs that operate as a unit of a bank pay income taxes at normal rates to the extent that the IBEs’ net income exceeds 20% of the bank’s total net taxable income.
          For the quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2010, the Corporation recognized an income tax expense of $3.8 million and $10.7 million, respectively, compared to an income tax benefit of $98.1 million and $112.3 million recorded for the same periods in 2009. The variance in income tax expense mainly resulted from non-cash charges of approximately $45.1 million for the second quarter of 2010 and $86.0 million for the first half of 2010 to increase the valuation allowance of the Corporation’s deferred tax asset. Most of the increase is related to deferred tax assets created in 2010 that were fully reserved. Approximately $3.5 million of the increase to the valuation allowance, which was recorded in the first quarter of 2010, was related to deferred tax assets created before 2010 and the remaining income tax expense is related to the operations of profitable subsidiaries.
          As of June 30, 2010, the deferred tax asset, net of a valuation allowance of $277.7 million, amounted to $97.2 million compared to $109.2 million as of December 31, 2009. In addition to the aforementioned $3.5 million increase in the valuation allowance related to deferred tax assets created prior to 2010, the decrease in the deferred tax asset during 2010 was mainly related to the creation of deferred tax liabilities in connection with unrealized gains on available for sale securities; such charge was recorded as part of other comprehensive income.
          Accounting for income taxes requires that companies assess whether a valuation allowance should be recorded against their deferred tax assets based on the consideration of all available evidence, using a “more likely than not” realization standard. Valuation allowances are established, when necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. In making such assessment, significant weight is to be given to evidence that can be objectively verified, including both positive and negative evidence. The accounting for income taxes guidance requires the consideration of all sources of taxable income available to realize the deferred tax asset, including the future reversal of existing temporary differences, future taxable income exclusive of reversing temporary differences and carryforwards, taxable income in carryback years and tax planning strategies. In estimating taxes, management assesses the relative merits and risks of the appropriate tax treatment of transactions taking into account statutory, judicial and regulatory guidance, and recognizes tax benefits only when deemed probable.
          In assessing the weight of positive and negative evidence, a significant negative factor that has resulted in increases of the valuation allowance was that the Corporation’s banking subsidiary FirstBank Puerto Rico continues in a three-year historical cumulative loss as of the end of the second quarter of 2010, mainly as a result of charges to the provision for loan and lease losses, especially in the construction loan portfolio in both, Puerto Rico and Florida markets, as a result of the economic downturn. As of June 30, 2010, management concluded that $97.2 million of the deferred tax assets will be realized. In assessing the likelihood of realizing the deferred tax assets, management has considered all four sources of taxable income mentioned above and, even though the Corporation expects to be profitable in the near future and be able to realize the deferred tax asset, given current uncertain economic conditions, the Corporation has only relied on tax-planning strategies as the main source of taxable income to realize the deferred tax asset amount. Among the most significant tax-planning strategies identified are: (i) sale of appreciated assets, (ii) consolidation of profitable and unprofitable companies (in Puerto Rico each company files a separate tax return; no consolidated tax returns are permitted), and (iii) deferral of deductions without affecting their utilization. Management will continue monitoring the likelihood of realizing the deferred tax assets in future periods. If future events differ from management’s June 30, 2010 assessment, an additional valuation allowance may need to be established, which may have a material adverse effect on the Corporation’s results of operations. Similarly, to the extent the realization of a portion, or all, of the tax asset becomes “more likely than not” based on changes in circumstances (such as, improved earnings, changes in tax laws or other relevant changes), a reversal of that portion of the deferred tax asset valuation allowance will then be recorded.
          The increase in the valuation allowance does not have any impact on the Corporation’s liquidity or cash flow, nor does such an allowance preclude the Corporation from using tax losses, tax credits or other deferred tax assets in the future.
          The income tax provision in 2010 and 2009 was also impacted by adjustments to deferred tax amounts as a result of the aforementioned changes to the PR Code enacted tax rates. Deferred tax amounts have been adjusted for the effect of the change in the income tax rate considering the enacted tax rate expected to apply to taxable income in the period in which the deferred tax asset or liability is expected to be settled or realized and an adjustment of $1.0 million and $7.3 million was recorded for the second quarter and first half of 2010, respectively.

35


Table of Contents

          FASB guidance prescribes a comprehensive model for the financial statement recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of income tax uncertainties with respect to positions taken or expected to be taken on income tax returns. Under the authoritative accounting guidance, income tax benefits are recognized and measured based upon a two-step model: 1) a tax position must be more likely than not to be sustained based solely on its technical merits in order to be recognized, and 2) the benefit is measured as the largest dollar amount of that position that is more likely than not to be sustained upon settlement. The difference between the benefit recognized in accordance with this model and the tax benefit claimed on a tax return is referred to as an unrecognized tax benefits (“UTB”).
          During the second quarter of 2009, the Corporation reversed UTBs of $10.8 million and related accrued interest of $3.5 million due to the lapse of the statute of limitations for the 2004 taxable year. Also, in July 2009, the Corporation entered into an agreement with the Puerto Rico Department of the Treasury to conclude an income tax audit and to eliminate all possible income and withholding tax deficiencies related to taxable years 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008. As a result of such agreement, the Corporation reversed during the third quarter of 2009 the remaining UTBs and related interest by approximately $2.9 million, net of the payment made to the Puerto Rico Department of the Treasury in connection with the conclusion of the tax audit. There were no UTBs outstanding as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
          The Corporation classified all interest and penalties, if any, related to tax uncertainties as income tax expense. For the first half of 2009, the total amount of interest recognized by the Corporation as part of income tax expense was $0.5 million. The amount of UTBs may increase or decrease for various reasons, including changes in the amounts for current tax year positions, the expiration of open income tax returns due to the expiration of statutes of limitations, changes in management’s judgment about the level of uncertainty, the status of examinations, litigation and legislative activity and the addition or elimination of uncertain tax positions.
19 — FAIR VALUE
Fair Value Option
Medium-Term Notes
          The Corporation elected the fair value option for certain medium term notes that were hedged with interest rate swaps that were previously designated for fair value hedge accounting. As of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, these medium-term notes had a fair value of $10.5 million and $13.4 million, respectively, and principal balance of $15.4 million recorded in notes payable. Interest paid/accrued on these instruments is recorded as part of interest expense and the accrued interest is part of the fair value of the notes. Electing the fair value option allows the Corporation to eliminate the burden of complying with the requirements for hedge accounting (e.g., documentation and effectiveness assessment) without introducing earnings volatility.
          Medium-term notes for which the Corporation elected the fair value option were priced using observable market data in the institutional markets.
Callable brokered CDs
          In the past, the Corporation also measured at fair value callable brokered CDs. All of the brokered CDs measured at fair value were called during 2009.
Fair Value Measurement
          The FASB authoritative guidance for fair value measurement defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. This guidance also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. Three levels of inputs may be used to measure fair value:
Level 1— Valuations of Level 1 assets and liabilities are obtained from readily available pricing sources for market transactions involving identical assets or liabilities. Level 1 assets and liabilities include equity securities that are traded in an active exchange market, as well as certain U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government and agency securities and corporate debt securities that are traded by dealers or brokers in active markets.
Level 2— Valuations of Level 2 assets and liabilities are based on observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. Level 2 assets and liabilities include (i) mortgage-backed securities for which the fair value is estimated based on the value of identical or comparable assets, (ii) debt securities with quoted prices that are traded less frequently than exchange-traded instruments and (iii) derivative contracts and financial liabilities (e.g.,

36


Table of Contents

medium-term notes elected to be measured at fair value) whose value is determined using a pricing model with inputs that are observable in the market or can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3— Valuations of Level 3 assets and liabilities are based on unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. Level 3 assets and liabilities include financial instruments whose value is determined using pricing models for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation.
          For the quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2010, there have been no transfers into or out of Level 1 and Level 2 measurements of the fair value hierarchy.
Estimated Fair Value of Financial Instruments
          The information about the estimated fair value of financial instruments required by GAAP is presented hereunder. The aggregate fair value amounts presented do not necessarily represent management’s estimate of the underlying value of the Corporation.
          The estimated fair value is subjective in nature and involves uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and, therefore, cannot be determined with precision. Changes in the underlying assumptions used in calculating fair value could significantly affect the results. In addition, the fair value estimates are based on outstanding balances without attempting to estimate the value of anticipated future business.
          The following table presents the estimated fair value and carrying value of financial instruments as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
                                 
    Total Carrying             Total Carrying        
    Amount in             Amount in        
    Statement of             Statement of        
    Financial     Fair Value     Financial     Fair Value  
    Condition     Estimated     Condition     Estimated  
    6/30/2010     6/30/2010     12/31/2009     12/31/2009  
    (In thousands)  
Assets:
                               
Cash and due from banks and money market investments
  $ 545,091     $ 545,091     $ 704,084     $ 704,084  
Investment securities available for sale
    3,954,910       3,954,910       4,170,782       4,170,782  
Investment securities held to maturity
    533,302       562,334       601,619       621,584  
Other equity securities
    69,843       69,843       69,930       69,930  
Loans receivable, including loans held for sale
    12,603,738       11,451,577       13,949,226          
Less: allowance for loan and lease losses
    (604,304 )             (528,120 )        
 
                       
Loans, net of allowance
    11,999,434             13,421,106       12,811,010  
 
                       
Derivatives, included in assets
    1,195       1,195       5,936       5,936  
 
                               
Liabilities:
                               
Deposits
    12,727,575       12,865,705       12,669,047       12,801,811  
Loans payable
                900,000       900,000  
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
    2,584,438       2,778,962       3,076,631       3,242,110  
Advances from FHLB
    940,440       983,881       978,440       1,025,605  
Notes Payable
    24,059       22,120       27,117       25,716  
Other borrowings
    231,959       66,330       231,959       80,267  
Derivatives, included in liabilities
    5,955       5,955       6,467       6,467  
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, including financial liabilities for which the Corporation has elected the fair value option, are summarized below:

37


Table of Contents

                                                                 
    As of June 30, 2010   As of December 31, 2009
    Fair Value Measurements Using   Fair Value Measurements Using
                            Assets / Liabilities                           Assets / Liabilities
(In thousands)   Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   at Fair Value   Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   at Fair Value
Assets:
                                                               
Securities available for sale :
                                                               
Equity securities
  $ 104     $     $     $ 104     $ 303     $     $     $ 303  
U.S. Treasury Securities
    608,373                   608,373                          
Non-callable U.S. agency debt
    304,569                   304,569                                  
Callable U.S. agency debt and MBS
          2,822,569             2,822,569             3,949,799             3,949,799  
Puerto Rico Government Obligations
          135,853       2,584       138,437             136,326             136,326  
Private label MBS
                80,858       80,858                   84,354       84,354  
Derivatives, included in assets:
                                                               
Interest rate swap agreements
          393             393             319             319  
Purchased interest rate cap agreements
          30             30             224       4,199       4,423  
Purchased options used to manage exposure to the stock market on embeded stock indexed options
          772             772             1,194             1,194  
Liabilities:
                                                             
Medium-term notes
          10,504             10,504             13,361             13,361  
Derivatives, included in liabilities:
                                                               
Interest rate swap agreements
            5,202             5,202             5,068             5,068  
Written interest rate cap agreements
          27             27             201             201  
Embedded written options on stock index deposits and notes payable
          726             726             1,198             1,198  
                 
    Changes in Fair Value for the Quarter Ended     Changes in Fair Value for the Six-Month Period Ended  
    June 30, 2010, for items Measured at Fair Value     June 30, 2010, for items Measured at Fair Value  
    Pursuant to Election of the Fair Value Option     Pursuant to Election of the Fair Value Option  
    Unrealized Gains     Unrealized Gains  
    and Interest Expense     and Interest Expense  
    included in     included in  
(In thousands)   Current-Period Earnings(1)     Current-Period Earnings(1)  
Medium-term notes
  $ 3,602     $ 2,432  
 
           
 
  $ 3,602     $ 2,432  
 
           
 
(1)   Changes in fair value for the quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2010 include interest expense on medium-term notes of $0.2 million and $0.4 million, respectively. Interest expense on medium-term notes that have been elected to be carried at fair value is recorded in interest expense in the Consolidated Statement of (Loss) Income based on their contractual coupons.
                                                 
    Changes in Fair Value for the Quarter Ended     Changes in Fair Value for the Six-Month Period Ended  
    June 30, 2009, for items Measured at Fair Value Pursuant     June 30, 2009, for items Measured at Fair Value Pursuant  
    to Election of the Fair Value Option     to Election of the Fair Value Option  
                    Total                     Total  
                    Changes in Fair Value                     Changes in Fair Value  
    Unrealized Losses and     Unrealized Gains and     Unrealized (Losses) Gains     Unrealized Gains and     Unrealized Losses and     Unrealized Gains (Losses)  
    Interest Expense included     Interest Expense included     and Interest Expense     Interest Expense included     Interest Expense included     and Interest Expense  
    in Interest Expense     in Interest Expense     included in     in Interest Expense     in Interest Expense     included in  
(In thousands)   on Deposits(1)     on Notes Payable(1)     Current-Period Earnings(1)     on Deposits(1)     on Notes Payable(1)     Current-Period Earnings(1)  
Callable brokered CDs
  $ (287 )   $     $ (287 )   $ (2,068 )   $     $ (2,068 )
Medium-term notes
          (1,892 )     (1,892 )           (1,849 )     (1,849 )
 
                                   
 
  $ (287 )   $ (1,892 )   $ (2,179 )   $ (2,068 )   $ (1,849 )   $ (3,917 )
 
                                   
 
(1)   Changes in fair value for the quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2009 include interest expense on callable brokered CDs of $1.8 million, and $10.8 million, respectively, and interest expense on medium-term notes of $0.2 million and $0.4 million, respectively. Interest expense on callable brokered CDs and medium-term notes that have been elected to be carried at fair value are recorded in interest expense in the Consolidated Statement of (Loss) Income based on their contractual coupons.
          The table below presents a reconciliation for all assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the quarter and six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.

38


Table of Contents

                                 
    Total Fair Value Measurements     Total Fair Value Measurements  
    (Quarter Ended June 30, 2010)     (Six-Month Period Ended June 30, 2010)  
Level 3 Instruments Only           Securities Available For             Securities Available For  
(In thousands)   Derivatives     Sale(2)     Derivatives     Sale(2)  
Beginning balance
  $ 3,487     $ 80,883     $ 4,199     $ 84,354  
Total gains or (losses) (realized / unrealized):
                               
Included in earnings
    (440 )           (1,152 )      
Included in other comprehensive income
          3,647             3,970  
Purchases
          2,584             2,584  
Principal repayments and amortization
          (3,672 )           (7,466 )
Other (1)
    (3,047 )           (3,047 )      
 
                       
 
Ending balance
  $     $ 83,442     $     $ 83,442  
 
                       
 
(1)   Amounts related to the valuation of interest rate cap agreements. The counterparty to these interest rate cap agreement collapsed on April 30, 2010 and was acquired by another financial institution through a FDIC assisted transaction. The Corporation currently has a claim with the FDIC.
 
(2)   Amounts mostly related to certain private label mortgage-backed securities.
                                 
    Total Fair Value Measurements     Total Fair Value Measurements  
    (Quarter Ended June 30, 2009)     (Six-Month Period Ended June 30, 2009)  
Level 3 Instruments Only           Securities Available For             Securities Available For  
(In thousands)   Derivatives(1)     Sale(2)     Derivatives(1)     Sale(2)  
Beginning balance
  $ 982     $ 110,982     $ 760     $ 113,983  
Total gains or (losses) (realized / unrealized):
                               
Included in earnings
    2,532       (1,061 )     2,754       (1,061 )
Included in other comprehensive income
          (2,372 )           (1,244 )
Principal repayments and amortization
          (10,981 )           (15,110 )
 
                       
Ending balance
  $ 3,514     $ 96,568     $ 3,514     $ 96,568  
 
                       
 
(1)   Amounts related to the valuation of interest rate cap agreements.
 
(2)   Amounts mostly related to certain private label mortgage-backed securities.
          The table below summarizes changes in unrealized gains and losses recorded in earnings for the quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2009 for Level 3 assets and liabilities that are still held at the end of such periods.
                                 
    Changes in Unrealized     Changes in Unrealized  
    Gains (Losses)     Gains (Losses)  
    Quarter Ended     Six-Month Period Ended  
    June 30, 2009     June 30, 2009  
Level 3 Instruments Only           Securities Available For             Securities Available For  
(In thousands)   Derivatives     Sale     Derivatives     Sale  
Changes in unrealized gains (losses) relating to assets still held at reporting date (1)
                               
Interest income on loans
  $ 43     $     $ 48     $  
Interest income on investment securities
    2,489             2,706        
Net impairment losses on investment securities
          (1,061 )           (1,061 )
 
                       
 
  $ 2,532     $ (1,061 )   $ 2,754     $ (1,061 )
 
                       
 
(1)   Unrealized losses of $2.4 million and $1.2 million on Level 3 available-for-sale securities was recognized as part of comprehensive income for the quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2009.
          Additionally, fair value is used on a non-recurring basis to evaluate certain assets in accordance with GAAP. Adjustments to fair value usually result from the application of lower-of-cost-or-market accounting (e.g., loans held for sale carried at the lower of cost or fair value and repossessed assets) or write-downs of individual assets (e.g., goodwill, loans).

39


Table of Contents

          As of June 30, 2010, impairment or valuation adjustments were recorded for assets recognized at fair value on a non-recurring basis as shown in the following table:
                                         
                            (Losses) gains recorded for   Losses recorded for
                            the Quarter Ended   the Six-month period
    Carrying value as of June 30, 2010   June 30, 2010   ended June 30, 2010
(In thousands)   Level 1   Level 2   Level 3                
Loans receivable (1)
  $     $     $ 1,443,045     $ (126,622 )   $ (272,859 )
Other Real Estate Owned (2)
                72,358       (7,631 )     (8,669 )
Loans held for sale (3)
          100,626             3     (137 )
 
(1)   Mainly impaired commercial and construction loans. The impairment was generally measured based on the fair value of the collateral. The fair values are derived from appraisals that take into consideration prices in observed transactions involving similar assets in similar locations but adjusted for specific characteristics and assumptions of the collateral (e.g. absorption rates), which are not market observable.
 
(2)   The fair value is derived from appraisals that take into consideration prices in observed transactions involving similar assets in similar locations but adjusted for specific characteristics and assumptions of the properties (e.g. absorption rates), which are not market observable. Losses are related to market valaution adjustments after the transfer from the loan to the Other Real Estate Owned (“OREO”) portfolio.
 
(3)   Fair value is primarily derived from quotations based on the mortgage-backed securities market.
          As of June 30, 2009, impairment or valuation adjustments were recorded for assets recognized at fair value on a non-recurring basis as shown in the following table:
                                         
                            Losses recorded for   Losses recorded for
                            the Quarter Ended   the Six-month period
    Carrying value as of June 30, 2009   June 30, 2009   ended June 30, 2009
(In thousands)   Level 1   Level 2   Level 3                
Loans receivable (1)
  $     $     $ 759,241     $ 80,146     $ 117,880  
Other Real Estate Owned (2)
                58,064       3,677       5,695  
Core deposit intangible (3)
                7,348       270       3,988  
 
(1)   Mainly impaired commercial and construction loans. The impairment was generally measured based on the fair value of the collateral. The fair values are derived from appraisals that take into consideration prices in observed transactions involving similar assets in similar locations but adjusted for specific characteristics and assumptions of the collateral (e.g. absorption rates), which are not market observable.
 
(2)   The fair value is derived from appraisals that take into consideration prices in observed transactions involving similar assets in similar locations but adjusted for specific characteristics and assumptions of the properties (e.g. absorption rates), which are not market observable. Losses are related to market valaution adjustments after the transfer from the loan to the OREO portfolio.
 
(3)   Amount represents core deposit intangible of FirstBank Florida. The impairment was generally measured based on internal information about decreases in the base of core deposits acquired upon the acquisition of FirstBank Florida.
          The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for instruments for which an estimated fair value is presented as well as for instruments for which the Corporation has elected the fair value option. The estimated fair value was calculated using certain facts and assumptions, which vary depending on the specific financial instrument.
Cash and due from banks and money market investments
          The carrying amounts of cash and due from banks and money market investments are reasonable estimates of their fair value. Money market investments include held-to-maturity U.S. Government obligations, which have a contractual maturity of three months or less. The fair value of these securities is based on quoted market prices in active markets that incorporate the risk of nonperformance.
Investment securities available for sale and held to maturity
          The fair value of investment securities is the market value based on quoted market prices (as is the case with equity securities, U.S. Treasury notes and non-callable U.S. Agency debt securities), when available, or market prices for identical or comparable assets (as is the case with MBS and callable U.S. agency debt) that are based on observable market parameters including benchmark yields, reported trades, quotes from brokers or dealers, issuer spreads, bids, offers and reference data including market research operations. Observable prices in the market already consider the risk of nonperformance. If listed prices or quotes are not available, fair value is based upon models that use unobservable inputs due to the limited market activity of the instrument, as is the case with certain private label mortgage-backed securities held by the Corporation.
          Private label mortgage-backed securities are collateralized by fixed-rate mortgages on single-family residential properties in the United States and the interest rate on the securities is variable, tied to 3-month LIBOR and limited to the weighted-average coupon

40


Table of Contents

of the underlying collateral. The market valuation is derived from a model and represents the estimated net cash flows over the projected life of the pool of underlying assets applying a discount rate that reflects market observed floating spreads over LIBOR, with a widening spread bias on a nonrated security and utilizes relevant assumptions such as prepayment rate, default rate, and loss severity on a loan level basis. The Corporation modeled the cash flow from the fixed-rate mortgage collateral using a static cash flow analysis according to collateral attributes of the underlying mortgage pool (i.e. loan term, current balance, note rate, rate adjustment type, rate adjustment frequency, rate caps, others) in combination with prepayment forecasts obtained from a commercially available prepayment model (ADCO). The variable cash flow of the security is modeled using the 3-month LIBOR forward curve. Loss assumptions were driven by the combination of default and loss severity estimates, taking into account loan credit characteristics (loan-to-value, state, origination date, property type, occupancy loan purpose, documentation type, debt-to-income ratio, other) to provide an estimate of default and loss severity. Refer to Note 4- Investment securities for additional information about assumptions used in the valuation of private label MBS.
Other equity securities
          Equity or other securities that do not have a readily available fair value are stated at the net realizable value, which management believes is a reasonable proxy for their fair value. This category is principally composed of stock that is owned by the Corporation to comply with FHLB regulatory requirements. Their realizable value equals their cost as these shares can be freely redeemed at par.
Loans receivable, including loans held for sale
          The fair value of all loans was estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, using interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms and credit quality and with adjustments that the Corporation’s management believes a market participant would consider in determining fair value. Loans were classified by type such as commercial, residential mortgage, credit cards and automobile. These asset categories were further segmented into fixed- and adjustable-rate categories. The fair values of performing fixed-rate and adjustable-rate loans were calculated by discounting expected cash flows through the estimated maturity date. Loans with no stated maturity, like credit lines, were valued at book value. Prepayment assumptions were considered for non-residential loans. For residential mortgage loans, prepayment estimates were based on prepayment experiences of generic U.S. mortgage-backed securities pools with similar characteristics (e.g. coupon and original term) and adjusted based on the Corporation’s historical data. Discount rates were based on the Treasury and LIBOR/Swap Yield Curves at the date of the analysis, and included appropriate adjustments for expected credit losses and liquidity. For impaired collateral dependent loans, the impairment was primarily measured based on the fair value of the collateral, which is derived from appraisals that take into consideration prices in observable transactions involving similar assets in similar locations.
Deposits
          The estimated fair value of demand deposits and savings accounts, which are deposits with no defined maturities, equals the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. For deposits with stated maturities, but that reprice at least quarterly, the fair value is also estimated to be the recorded amounts at the reporting date. The fair values of retail fixed-rate time deposits, with stated maturities, are based on the present value of the future cash flows expected to be paid on the deposits. The cash flows were based on contractual maturities; no early repayments are assumed. Discount rates were based on the LIBOR yield curve.
          The estimated fair value of total deposits excludes the fair value of core deposit intangibles, which represent the value of the customer relationship measured by the value of demand deposits and savings deposits that bear a low or zero rate of interest and do not fluctuate in response to changes in interest rates.
          The fair value of brokered CDs, which are included within deposits, is determined using discounted cash flow analyses over the full term of the CDs. The valuation uses a “Hull-White Interest Rate Tree” approach, an industry-standard approach for valuing instruments with interest rate call options. The fair value of the CDs is computed using the outstanding principal amount. The discount rates used are based on US dollar LIBOR and swap rates. At-the-money implied swaption volatility term structure (volatility by time to maturity) is used to calibrate the model to current market prices. The fair value does not incorporate the risk of nonperformance, since brokered CDs are generally participated out by brokers in shares of less than $100,000 and insured by the FDIC.
Loans payable
          Loans payable consisted of short-term borrowings under the FED Discount Window Program. Due to the short-term nature of these borrowings, their outstanding balances are estimated to be the fair value.
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase

41


Table of Contents

          Some repurchase agreements reprice at least quarterly, and their outstanding balances are estimated to be their fair value. Where longer commitments are involved, fair value is estimated using exit price indications of the cost of unwinding the transactions as of the end of the reporting period. Securities sold under agreements to repurchase are fully collateralized by investment securities.
Advances from FHLB
          The fair value of advances from FHLB with fixed maturities is determined using discounted cash flow analyses over the full term of the borrowings, using indications of the fair value of similar transactions. The cash flows assume no early repayment of the borrowings. Discount rates are based on the LIBOR yield curve. For advances from FHLB that reprice quarterly, their outstanding balances are estimated to be their fair value. Advances from FHLB are fully collateralized by mortgage loans and, to a lesser extent, investment securities.
Derivative instruments
          The fair value of most of the derivative instruments is based on observable market parameters and takes into consideration the credit risk component of paying counterparties when appropriate, except when collateral is pledged. That is, on interest rate swaps, the credit risk of both counterparties is included in the valuation; and on options and caps, only the seller’s credit risk is considered. The “Hull-White Interest Rate Tree” approach is used to value the option components of derivative instruments, and discounting of the cash flows is performed using US dollar LIBOR-based discount rates or yield curves that account for the industry sector and the credit rating of the counterparty and/or the Corporation. Derivatives include interest rate swaps used for protection against rising interest rates and, prior to June 30, 2009, included interest rate swaps to economically hedge brokered CDs and medium-term notes. For these interest rate swaps, a credit component was not considered in the valuation since the Corporation has fully collateralized with investment securities any mark to market loss with the counterparty and, if there were market gains, the counterparty had to deliver collateral to the Corporation.
          Certain derivatives with limited market activity, as is the case with derivative instruments named as “reference caps,” were valued using models that consider unobservable market parameters (Level 3). Reference caps were used mainly to hedge interest rate risk inherent in private label mortgage-backed securities, thus were tied to the notional amount of the underlying fixed-rate mortgage loans originated in the United States. The counterparty to these derivative instruments collapsed on April 30, 2010. The Corporation currently has a claim with the FDIC and the exposure to fair value of $3.0 million was recorded as an account receivable. In the past, significant inputs used for the fair value determination consisted of specific characteristics such as information used in the prepayment model which followed the amortizing schedule of the underlying loans, which was an unobservable input. The valuation model used the Black formula, which is a benchmark standard in the financial industry. The Black formula is similar to the Black-Scholes formula for valuing stock options except that the spot price of the underlying is replaced by the forward price. The Black formula uses as inputs the strike price of the cap, forward LIBOR rates, volatility estimates and discount rates to estimate the option value. LIBOR rates and swap rates are obtained from Bloomberg L.P. (“Bloomberg”) every day and are used to build a zero coupon curve based on the Bloomberg LIBOR/Swap curve. The discount factor is then calculated from the zero coupon curve. The cap is the sum of all caplets. For each caplet, the rate is reset at the beginning of each reporting period and payments are made at the end of each period. The cash flow of each caplet is then discounted from each payment date.
          Although most of the derivative instruments are fully collateralized, a credit spread is considered for those that are not secured in full. The cumulative mark-to-market effect of credit risk in the valuation of derivative instruments resulted in an unrealized gain of approximately $0.5 million as of June 30, 2010, which includes an immaterial unrealized loss $65,000 for the first half of 2010.
Term notes payable
          The fair value of term notes is determined using a discounted cash flow analysis over the full term of the borrowings. This valuation also uses the “Hull-White Interest Rate Tree” approach to value the option components of the term notes. The model assumes that the embedded options are exercised economically. The fair value of medium-term notes is computed using the notional amount outstanding. The discount rates used in the valuations are based on US dollar LIBOR and swap rates. At-the-money implied swaption volatility term structure (volatility by time to maturity) is used to calibrate the model to current market prices and value the cancellation option in the term notes. For the medium-term notes, the credit risk is measured using the difference in yield curves between swap rates and a yield curve that considers the industry and credit rating of the Corporation as issuer of the note at a tenor comparable to the time to maturity of the note and option. The net gain from fair value changes attributable to the Corporation’s own credit to the medium-term notes for which the Corporation has elected the fair value option recorded for the first half of 2010 amounted to $2.7 million, compared to an unrealized loss of $10.1 million for the first half of 2009. The cumulative mark-to-market unrealized gain on the medium-term notes since measured at fair value attributable to credit risk amounted to $5.3 million as of June 30, 2010.

42


Table of Contents

Other borrowings
          Other borrowings consist of junior subordinated debentures. Projected cash flows from the debentures were discounted using the LIBOR yield curve plus a credit spread. This credit spread was estimated using the difference in yield curves between Swap rates and a yield curve that considers the industry and credit rating of the Corporation as issuer of the note at a tenor comparable to the time to maturity of the debentures.
20 — SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION
          Supplemental cash flow information follows:
                 
    Six-Month Period Ended June 30,
    2010   2009
    (In thousands)
Cash paid for:
               
 
               
Interest on borrowings
  $ 192,323     $ 283,134  
Income tax
          319  
 
               
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
               
 
               
Additions to other real estate owned
    48,507       52,862  
Additions to auto repossesion
    37,614       40,048  
Capitalization of servicing assets
    3,063       3,181  
Loan securitizations
    105,112       187,815  
Non-cash acquisition of mortgage loans that previously served as collateral of a commercial loan to a local financial institution
          205,395  
21 — SEGMENT INFORMATION
          Based upon the Corporation’s organizational structure and the information provided to the Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation and, to a lesser extent, the Board of Directors, the operating segments are driven primarily by the Corporation’s lines of business for its operations in Puerto Rico, the Corporation’s principal market, and by geographic areas for its operations outside of Puerto Rico. As of June 30, 2010, the Corporation had six reportable segments: Commercial and Corporate Banking; Mortgage Banking; Consumer (Retail) Banking; Treasury and Investments; United States operations and Virgin Islands operations. Management determined the reportable segments based on the internal reporting used to evaluate performance and to assess where to allocate resources. Other factors such as the Corporation’s organizational chart, nature of the products, distribution channels and the economic characteristics of the products were also considered in the determination of the reportable segments.
          Starting in the fourth quarter of 2009, the Corporation realigned its reporting segments to better reflect how it views and manages its business. Two additional operating segments were created to evaluate the operations conducted by the Corporation, outside of Puerto Rico. Operations conducted in the United States and in the Virgin Islands are now individually evaluated as separate operating segments. This realignment in the segment reporting essentially reflects the effect of restructuring initiatives, including the merger of FirstBank Florida operations with and into FirstBank, and allows the Corporation to better present the results from its growth focus.
          Prior to the third quarter of 2009, the operating segments were driven primarily by the Corporation’s legal entities. FirstBank operations conducted in the Virgin Islands and through its loan production office in Miami, Florida were reflected in the Corporation’s then four reportable segments (Commercial and Corporate Banking; Mortgage Banking; Consumer (Retail) Banking; Treasury and Investments) while the operations conducted by FirstBank Florida were reported as part of a category named “Other”. In the third quarter of 2009, as a result of the aforementioned merger, the operations of FirstBank Florida were reported as part of the four reportable segments. Starting in the first quarter of 2010, activities related to auto floor plan financings previously included as part of Consumer (Retail) Banking are now included as part of the Commercial and Corporate Banking segment. The changes in the fourth quarter of 2009 and first quarter of 2010 reflected a further realignment of the organizational structure as a result of management changes. Prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to current period presentation. These changes did not have an impact on the previously reported consolidated results of the Corporation.
          The Commercial and Corporate Banking segment consists of the Corporation’s lending and other services for large customers represented by specialized and middle-market clients and the public sector. The Commercial and Corporate Banking segment offers commercial loans, including commercial real estate and construction loans, and floor plan financings as well as other products such as cash management and business management services. The Mortgage Banking segment’s operations consist of the origination, sale and

43


Table of Contents

servicing of a variety of residential mortgage loans. The Mortgage Banking segment also acquires and sells mortgages in the secondary markets. In addition, the Mortgage Banking segment includes mortgage loans purchased from other local banks and mortgage bankers. The Consumer (Retail) Banking segment consists of the Corporation’s consumer lending and deposit taking activities conducted mainly through its branch network and loan centers. The Treasury and Investments segment is responsible for the Corporation’s investment portfolio and treasury functions executed to manage and enhance liquidity. This segment lends funds to the Commercial and Corporate Banking, Mortgage Banking and Consumer (Retail) Banking segments to finance their lending activities and borrows from those segments. The Consumer (Retail) Banking segment also lends funds to other segments. The interest rates charged or credited by Treasury and Investments and the Consumer (Retail) Banking segments are allocated based on market rates. The difference between the allocated interest income or expense and the Corporation’s actual net interest income from centralized management of funding costs is reported in the Treasury and Investments segment. The United States operations segment consists of all banking activities conducted by FirstBank in the United States mainland, including commercial and retail banking services. The Virgin Islands operations segment consists of all banking activities conducted by the Corporation in the U.S. and British Virgin Islands, including commercial and retail banking services and insurance activities.
          The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those referred to in Note 1 to the Corporation’s financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009 contained in the Corporation’s Annual Report or Form 10-K.
          The Corporation evaluates the performance of the segments based on net interest income, the estimated provision for loan and lease losses, non-interest income and direct non-interest expenses. The segments are also evaluated based on the average volume of their interest-earning assets less the allowance for loan and lease losses.
The following table presents information about the reportable segments (in thousands):

44


Table of Contents

                                                         
    Mortgage     Consumer     Commercial and     Treasury and     United States     Virgin Islands        
(In thousands)   Banking     (Retail) Banking     Corporate     Investments     Operations     Operations     Total  
For the quarter ended June 30, 2010:
                                                       
Interest income
  $ 39,634     $ 47,127     $ 57,691     $ 39,208     $ 13,308       17,896     $ 214,864  
Net (charge) credit for transfer of funds
    (24,185 )     2,681       (6,484 )     27,988                    
Interest expense
          (13,549 )           (69,123 )     (11,561 )     (1,569 )     (95,802 )
 
                                         
Net interest income (loss)
    15,449       36,259       51,207       (1,927 )     1,747       16,327       119,062  
 
                                         
 
                                                       
Provision for loan and lease losses
    (29,424 )     (10,923 )     (71,651 )           (33,611 )     (1,184 )     (146,793 )
Non-interest income
    2,166       7,461       3,003       24,288       161       2,446       39,525  
Direct non-interest expenses
    (10,193 )     (25,151 )     (19,576 )     (1,413 )     (12,692 )     (10,500 )     (79,525 )
 
                                         
Segment (loss) income
  $ (22,002 )   $ 7,646     $ (37,017 )   $ 20,948     $ (44,395 )   $ 7,089     $ (67,731 )
 
                                         
 
                                                       
Average earnings (loss) assets
  $ 2,714,807     $ 1,625,859     $ 6,001,446     $ 5,428,208     $ 1,148,631     $ 1,031,373     $ 17,950,324  
 
    Mortgage     Consumer     Commercial and     Treasury and     United States     Virgin Islands        
    Banking     (Retail) Banking     Corporate     Investments     Operations     Operations     Total  
For the quarter ended June 30, 2009:
                                                       
Interest income
  $ 37,289     $ 50,113     $ 64,414     $ 66,491     $ 16,947       17,526     $ 252,780  
Net (charge) credit for transfer of funds
    (26,864 )     (552 )     (18,142 )     45,558                    
Interest expense
          (15,706 )           (84,616 )     (18,802 )     (2,642 )     (121,766 )
 
                                         
Net interest income (loss)
    10,425       33,855       46,272       27,433       (1,855 )     14,884       131,014  
 
                                         
 
                                                       
Provision for loan and lease losses
    (12,912 )     (11,594 )     (116,738 )           (85,715 )     (8,193 )     (235,152 )
Non-interest income
    2,294       7,948       1,246       8,365       1,106       2,456       23,415  
Direct non-interest expenses
    (8,701 )     (24,101 )     (13,159 )     (1,990 )     (10,793 )     (12,122 )     (70,866 )
 
                                         
Segment (loss) income
  $ (8,894 )   $ 6,108     $ (82,379 )   $ 33,808     $ (97,257 )   $ (2,975 )   $ (151,589 )
 
                                         
 
                                                       
Average earnings assets
  $ 2,554,381     $ 1,792,475     $ 6,460,666     $ 6,015,421     $ 1,509,517     $ 986,728     $ 19,319,188  
                                                         
    Mortgage     Consumer     Commercial and     Treasury and     United States     Virgin Islands        
    Banking     (Retail) Banking     Corporate     Investments     Operations     Operations     Total  
For the six-month period ended June 30, 2010:
                                                       
Interest income
  $ 79,660     $ 94,689     $ 116,533     $ 81,982     $ 27,238     $ 35,750     $ 435,852  
Net (charge) credit for transfer of funds
    (49,512 )     4,821       (13,310 )     58,001                    
Interest expense
          (27,117 )           (146,863 )     (22,828 )     (3,119 )     (199,927 )
 
                                         
Net interest income (loss)
    30,148       72,393       103,223       (6,880 )     4,410       32,631       235,925  
 
                                         
 
                                                       
Provision for loan and lease losses
    (45,438 )     (23,416 )     (131,099 )           (104,813 )     (12,992 )     (317,758 )
Non-interest income
    4,417       14,768       4,605       54,873       315       5,873       84,851  
Direct non-interest expenses
    (18,288 )     (49,151 )     (37,162 )     (3,025 )     (22,009 )     (21,509 )     (151,144 )
 
                                         
Segment (loss) income
  $ (29,161 )   $ 14,594     $ (60,433 )   $ 44,968     $ (122,097 )   $ 4,003     $ (148,126 )
 
                                         
 
                                                       
Average earnings assets
  $ 2,712,067     $ 1,646,337     $ 6,225,334     $ 5,447,358     $ 1,204,921     $ 1,036,541     $ 18,272,558  
                                                         
    Mortgage     Consumer     Commercial and     Treasury and     United States     Virgin Islands        
    Banking     (Retail) Banking     Corporate     Investments     Operations     Operations     Total  
For the six-month period ended June 30, 2009:
                                                       
Interest income
  $ 76,768     $ 101,482     $ 125,071     $ 136,248     $ 36,249       35,285     $ 511,103  
Net (charge) credit for transfer of funds
    (55,995 )     (1,883 )     (44,438 )     102,316                    
Interest expense
          (31,718 )           (188,388 )     (32,673 )     (5,712 )     (258,491 )
 
                                         
Net interest income
    20,773       67,881       80,633       50,176       3,576       29,573       252,612  
 
                                         
 
                                                       
Provision for loan and lease losses
    (20,929 )     (14,644 )     (143,931 )           (100,780 )     (14,297 )     (294,581 )
Non-interest income
    3,157       15,779       2,492       25,887       1,218       4,935       53,468  
Direct non-interest expenses
    (15,730 )     (47,773 )     (21,897 )     (3,712 )     (22,015 )     (23,631 )     (134,758 )
 
                                         
Segment (loss) income
  $ (12,729 )   $ 21,243     $ (82,703 )   $ 72,351     $ (118,001 )   $ (3,420 )   $ (123,259 )
 
                                         
 
                                                       
Average earnings assets
  $ 2,589,961     $ 1,811,678     $ 6,275,378     $ 5,788,347     $ 1,499,170     $ 989,771       18,954,305  

45


Table of Contents

          The following table presents a reconciliation of the reportable segment financial information to the consolidated totals:
                                 
    Quarter Ended     Six-month Period Ended  
    June 30,     June 30,  
    2010     2009     2010     2009  
Net loss:
                               
 
                               
Total loss for segments
  $ (67,731 )   $ (151,589 )   $ (148,126 )   $ (123,259 )
Other operating expenses
    (19,086 )     (25,122 )     (38,829 )     (45,758 )
 
                       
Income before income taxes
    (86,817 )     (176,711 )     (186,955 )     (169,017 )
Income tax (expense) benefit
    (3,823 )     98,053       (10,684 )     112,250  
 
                       
Total consolidated net loss
  $ (90,640 )   $ (78,658 )   $ (197,639 )   $ (56,767 )
 
                       
 
                               
Average assets:
                               
 
                               
Total average earning assets for segments
  $ 17,950,324     $ 19,319,188     $ 18,272,558     $ 18,954,305  
Average non-earning assets
    770,618       741,908       745,439       731,276  
 
                       
Total consolidated average assets
  $ 18,720,942     $ 20,061,096     $ 19,017,997     $ 19,685,581  
 
                       
22 — COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
          The Corporation enters into financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments may include commitments to extend credit and commitments to sell mortgage loans at fair value. As of June 30, 2010, commitments to extend credit amounted to approximately $1.1 billion and standby letters of credit amounted to approximately $81.8 million. Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any conditions established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses. For most of the commercial lines of credit, the Corporation has the option to reevaluate the agreement prior to additional disbursements. In the case of credit cards and personal lines of credit, the Corporation can cancel the unused credit facility at any time and without cause. Generally, the Corporation’s mortgage banking activities do not enter into interest rate lock agreements with prospective borrowers.
          Lehman Brothers Special Financing, Inc. (“Lehman”) was the counterparty to the Corporation on certain interest rate swap agreements. During the third quarter of 2008, Lehman failed to pay the scheduled net cash settlement due to the Corporation, which constitutes an event of default under those interest rate swap agreements. The Corporation terminated all interest rate swaps with Lehman and replaced them with other counterparties under similar terms and conditions. In connection with the unpaid net cash settlement due as of June 30, 2010 under the swap agreements, the Corporation has an unsecured counterparty exposure with Lehman, which filed for bankruptcy on October 3, 2008, of approximately $1.4 million. This exposure was reserved in the third quarter of 2008. The Corporation had pledged collateral of $63.6 million with Lehman to guarantee its performance under the swap agreements in the event payment thereunder was required. The book value of pledged securities with Lehman as of June 30, 2010 amounted to approximately $64.5 million.
          The Corporation believes that the securities pledged as collateral should not be part of the Lehman bankruptcy estate given the fact that the posted collateral constituted a performance guarantee under the swap agreements and, was not part of a financing agreement, and ownership of the securities was never transferred to Lehman. Upon termination of the interest rate swap agreements, Lehman’s obligation was to return the collateral to the Corporation. During the fourth quarter of 2009, the Corporation discovered that Lehman Brothers, Inc., acting as agent of Lehman, had deposited the securities in a custodial account at JP Morgan/ Chase, and that, shortly before the filing of the Lehman bankruptcy proceedings, it had provided instructions to have most of the securities transferred to Barclay’s Capital in New York. After Barclay’s refusal to turn over the securities, the Corporation, during the month of December 2009, filed a lawsuit against Barclay’s Capital in federal court in New York demanding the return of the securities.
          During the month of February 2010, Barclays filed a motion with the court requesting that the Corporation’s claim be dismissed on the grounds that the allegations of the complaint are not sufficient to justify the granting of the remedies therein sought. Shortly thereafter, the Corporation filed its opposition motion. A hearing on the motions was held in court on April 28, 2010. The court on that date, after hearing the arguments by both sides, concluded that the Corporation’s equitable-based causes of action, upon which the return of the investment securities is being demanded, contain allegations that sufficiently plead facts warranting the denial of Barclays’ motion to dismiss the Corporation’s claim. Accordingly, the judge ordered the case to proceed to trial. The scheduling conference that had been set for August 26, 2010, for purposes of having the parties agree on a timetable for discovery has been temporarily suspended. The judge decided to order the parties to submit to a mediation process prior to a scheduling conference. While there have been preliminary telephonic conversations with the appointed mediator, no formal mediation sessions have been held. It is expected that within the next 30 days the mediator will notice dated for mediation sessions. While the Corporation believes it has valid reasons to support its claim for the return of the securities, no assurances can be given that it will ultimately succeed in its litigation against Barclay’s Capital to recover all or a substantial portion of the securities.
          Additionally, the Corporation continues to pursue its claim filed in January 2009 in the proceedings under the Securities Protection Act with regard to Lehman Brothers Incorporated in Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York. An estimated loss

46


Table of Contents

was not accrued as the Corporation is unable to determine the timing of the claim resolution or whether it will succeed in recovering all or a substantial portion of the collateral or its equivalent value. If additional relevant negative facts become available in future periods, a need to recognize a partial or full reserve of this claim may arise. Considering that the investment securities have not yet been recovered by the Corporation, despite its efforts in this regard, the Corporation decided to classify such investments as non-performing during the second quarter of 2009.
          As of June 30, 2010, First BanCorp and its subsidiaries were defendants in various legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. Management believes that the final disposition of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Corporation’s financial position or results of operations.
23 — FIRST BANCORP (Holding Company Only) Financial Information
          The following condensed financial information presents the financial position of the Holding Company only as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 and the results of its operations for the quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.
                 
    As of     As of  
    June 30,     December 31,  
    2010     2009  
    (In thousands)  
Assets
               
 
               
Cash and due from banks
  $ 52,270     $ 55,423  
Money market investments
    300       300  
Investment securities available for sale, at market:
               
Equity investments
    104       303  
Other investment securities
    1,300       1,550  
Investment in FirstBank Puerto Rico, at equity
    1,595,912       1,754,217  
Investment in FirstBank Insurance Agency, at equity
    6,345       6,709  
Investment in PR Finance, at equity
    3,209       3,036  
Investment in FBP Statutory Trust I
    3,093       3,093  
Investment in FBP Statutory Trust II
    3,866       3,866  
Other assets
    4,653       3,194  
 
           
Total assets
  $ 1,671,052     $ 1,831,691  
 
           
 
               
Liabilities & Stockholders’ Equity
               
 
               
Liabilities:
               
Other borrowings
  $ 231,959     $ 231,959  
Accounts payable and other liabilities
    804       669  
 
           
Total liabilities
    232,763       232,628  
 
           
Stockholders’ equity
    1,438,289       1,599,063  
 
           
Total Liabilities & Stockholders’ Equity
  $ 1,671,052     $ 1,831,691  
 
           

47


Table of Contents

                                 
    Quarter Ended     Six-Month Period Ended  
    June 30,     June 30,     June 30,     June 30,  
    2010     2009     2010     2009  
    (In thousands)  
Income:
                               
 
                               
Interest income on other investments
  $     $     $     $ 1  
Dividends from FirstBank Puerto Rico
    771       24,962       1,522       44,939  
Other income
    51       69       101       141  
 
                       
 
    822       25,031       1,623       45,081  
 
                       
 
                               
Expense:
                               
 
                               
Notes payable and other borrowings
    1,697       2,291       3,369       4,729  
Other operating expenses
    821       751       1,510       1,162  
 
                       
 
    2,518       3,042       4,879       5,891  
 
                       
 
                               
Net loss on investments and impairments
    (3 )           (603 )     (388 )
 
                       
 
                               
(Loss) income before income taxes and equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries
    (1,699 )     21,989       (3,859 )     38,802  
 
                               
Income tax provision
          (11 )           (3 )
 
                               
Equity in undistributed losses of subsidiaries
    (88,941 )     (100,636 )     (193,780 )     (95,566 )
 
                       
 
                               
Net loss
  $ (90,640 )   $ (78,658 )   $ (197,639 )   $ (56,767 )
 
                       
24 — SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
          On July 7, 2010, First BanCorp (the “Corporation”) entered into an Exchange Agreement (the “Exchange Agreement”) with the United States Department of the Treasury (the “Treasury”) pursuant to which the Treasury agreed, subject to the satisfaction or waiver of certain closing conditions, to exchange all 400,000 shares of the Corporation’s Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series F, with a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share (the “Series F Preferred Stock”), beneficially owned and held by the Treasury, for 400,000 shares of a new series of preferred stock, the Series G Preferred Stock, with a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share, plus additional shares of Series G Preferred Stock having a value equal to the accrued and unpaid dividends on the Series F Preferred Stock. The Corporation subsequently completed the transaction with the U.S. Treasury by issuing 424,174 shares of Series G Mandatorily Convertible Preferred Stock to the U.S. Treasury in exchange for the Series F preferred stock it previously held. The Series G preferred stock is convertible into approximately 380.2 million shares of the Corporation’s common stock, based upon the initial conversion price, by the Corporation upon the satisfaction of certain conditions and by the U.S. Treasury and any subsequent holder at any time and, unless earlier converted, is automatically convertible into common stock on the seventh anniversary of the issuance of the Series G Preferred Stock at the then current market price of the common stock.
          On July 16, 2010, the Corporation commenced an offer to exchange up to 256,401,610 newly issued shares of the Corporation’s common stock, par value $1.00 per share, for any and all of the issued and outstanding shares of Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income Preferred Stock, Series A through E.
          The Company has performed an evaluation of all other events occurring subsequent to June 30, 2010, management has determined that there are no additional events occurring in this period that required disclosure in or adjustment to the accompanying financial statements.

48


Table of Contents

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (MD&A)
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
(In thousands, except for per share and financial ratios)
                                 
    Quarter ended   Six-month period ended
    June 30,   June 30,   June 30,   June 30,
    2010   2009   2010   2009
Condensed Income Statements:
                               
Total interest income
  $ 214,864     $ 252,780     $ 435,852     $ 511,103  
Total interest expense
    95,802       121,766       199,927       258,491  
Net interest income
    119,062       131,014       235,925       252,612  
Provision for loan and lease losses
    146,793       235,152       317,758       294,581  
Non-interest income
    39,525       23,415       84,851       53,468  
Non-interest expenses
    98,611       95,988       189,973       180,516  
Loss before income taxes
    (86,817 )     (176,711 )     (186,955 )     (169,017 )
Income tax (expense) benefit
    (3,823 )     98,053       (10,684 )     112,250  
Net loss
    (90,640 )     (78,658 )     (197,639 )     (56,767 )
Net loss attributable to common stockholders
    (96,810 )     (94,825 )     (209,961 )     (88,052 )
Per Common Share Results:
                               
Net loss per share basic
  $ (1.05 )   $ (1.03 )   $ (2.27 )   $ (0.95 )
Net loss per share diluted
  $ (1.05 )   $ (1.03 )   $ (2.27 )   $ (0.95 )
Cash dividends declared
  $     $ 0.07     $     $ 0.14  
Average shares outstanding
    92,521       92,511       92,521       92,511  
Average shares outstanding diluted
    92,521       92,511       92,521       92,511  
Book value per common share
  $ 5.48     $ 9.88     $ 5.48     $ 9.88  
Tangible book value per common share (1)
  $ 5.01     $ 9.38     $ 5.01     $ 9.38  
Selected Financial Ratios (In Percent):
                               
Profitability:
                               
Return on Average Assets
    (1.94 )     (1.57 )     (2.10 )     (0.58 )
Interest Rate Spread (2)
    2.38       2.60       2.41       2.53  
Net Interest Margin (2)
    2.66       2.92       2.70       2.89  
Return on Average Total Equity
    (24.52 )     (15.93 )     (25.85 )     (5.89 )
Return on Average Common Equity
    (70.31 )     (36.14 )     (69.13 )     (16.99 )
Average Total Equity to Average Total Assets
    7.92       9.85       8.11       9.79  
Tangible common equity ratio (1)
    2.57       4.35       2.57       4.35  
Dividend payout ratio
          (6.84 )           (14.73 )
Efficiency ratio (3)
    62.18       62.16       59.22       58.98  
Asset Quality:
                               
Allowance for loan and lease losses to loans receivable
    4.83       3.11       4.83       3.11  
Net charge-offs (annualized) to average loans
    3.62       3.85       3.63       2.52  
Provision for loan and lease losses to net charge-offs
    124.62       180.97       131.54       174.97  
Non-performing assets to total assets
    9.39       6.53       9.39       6.53  
Non-accruing loans to total loans receivable
    12.40       8.94       12.40       8.94  
Allowance to total non-accruing loans
    38.97       34.81       38.97       34.81  
Allowance to total non-accruing loans excluding residential real estate loans
    54.81       52.85       54.81       52.85  
Other Information:
                               
Common Stock Price: End of period
  $ 0.53     $ 3.95     $ 0.53     $ 3.95  
                 
    As of   As of
    June 30,   December 31,
    2010   2009
Balance Sheet Data:
               
Loans and loans held for sale
  $ 12,603,738     $ 13,949,226  
Allowance for loan and lease losses
    604,304       528,120  
Money market and investment securities
    4,580,099       4,866,617  
Intangible assets
    43,401       44,698  
Deferred tax asset, net
    97,155       109,197  
Total assets
    18,116,023       19,628,448  
Deposits
    12,727,575       12,669,047  
Borrowings
    3,780,896       5,214,147  
Total preferred equity
    930,830       928,508  
Total common equity
    444,148       644,062  
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax
    63,311       26,493  
Total equity
    1,438,289       1,599,063  
 
(1)   Non-gaap measure. Refer to “Capital” discussion below for additional information about the components and reconciliation of these measures.
 
(2)   On a tax-equivalent basis and excluding the changes in fair value of derivative instruments and financial liabilities measured at fair value (see “Net Interest Income” discussion below for a reconciliation of this non-gaap measure).
 
(3)   Non-interest expenses to the sum of net interest income and non-interest income. The denominator includes non recurring income and changes in the fair value of derivative instruments and financial instruments measured at fair value.

49


Table of Contents

     The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations relates to the accompanying consolidated unaudited financial statements of First BanCorp (the “Corporation” or “First BanCorp”) and should be read in conjunction with the interim unaudited financial statements and the notes thereto.
DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
     First BanCorp is a diversified financial holding company headquartered in San Juan, Puerto Rico offering a full range of financial products to consumers and commercial customers through various subsidiaries. First BanCorp is the holding company of FirstBank Puerto Rico (“FirstBank” or the “Bank”) and FirstBank Insurance Agency. Through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, the Corporation operates offices in Puerto Rico, the United States and British Virgin Islands and the State of Florida (USA) specializing in commercial banking, residential mortgage loan originations, finance leases, personal loans, small loans, auto loans, insurance agency and broker-dealer activities.
     Effective June 2, 2010, FirstBank, by and through its Board of Directors, entered into a Consent Order with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) and the Office of the Commissioner of Financial Institutions of Puerto Rico (the “Order”), a copy of which is attached as Exhibit 10.1 of the Form 8-K filed by the Corporation on June 4, 2010. This Order provides for various things, including (among other things) the following: (1) within 30 days of entering into the Order, the development by FirstBank of a capital plan to achieve over time a leverage ratio of at least 8%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of at least 10% and a total risk-based capital ratio of at least 12%, (2) the preparation by FirstBank of strategic, liquidity and earnings plans and related projections within certain timetables set forth in the Order and on an ongoing basis, (3) the preparation by FirstBank of plans for reducing criticized assets and delinquent loans within timeframes set forth in the Order, (4) the requirement for First Bank board approval prior to the extension of credit to classified borrowers, (5) certain limitations with respect to brokered deposits, including the need for pre-approval by the FDIC of the issuance of brokered deposits, (6) the establishment by FirstBank of a comprehensive policy and methodology for determining the allowance for loan and lease losses and the review and revision of loan policies, including the non-accrual policy, and (7) the operation by FirstBank under adequate and effective programs of independent loan review and appraisal compliance and under an effective policy for managing sensitivity to interest rate risk. The foregoing summary is not complete and is qualified in all respects by reference to the actual language of the Order. Although all the regulatory capital ratios exceeded the established “well capitalized” levels at June 30, 2010, because of the Order with the FDIC, FirstBank cannot be treated as a “well capitalized” institution under regulatory guidance.
     Effective June 3, 2010, First BanCorp entered into a written agreement (the “Agreement” and collectively with the Order the “Agreements”) with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (“FED”), a copy of which is attached as Exhibit 10.2 of the Form 8-K filed by the Corporation on June 4, 2010. The Agreement provides, among other things, that the holding company must serve as a source of strength to FirstBank, and that, except upon consent of the FED, the holding company may not pay dividends to stockholders or receive dividends from FirstBank, the holding company and its nonbank subsidiaries may not make payments on trust preferred securities or subordinated debt, and the holding company cannot incur, increase or guarantee debt or repurchase any capital securities. The Agreement also requires that the holding company submit a capital plan that reflects sufficient capital, which must be acceptable to the FED, and follow certain guidelines with respect to the appointment or change in responsibilities of senior officers. The foregoing summary is not complete and is qualified in all respects by reference to the actual language of the Agreement.
     As discussed in Item 1, Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, the Corporation has assessed its ability to continue as a going concern and has concluded that, based on current and expected liquidity needs and sources, management expects the Corporation to be able to meet its obligations for a reasonable period of time. The Corporation has $3.5 billion of brokered CDs maturing within twelve months from June 30, 2010. Management believes it will continue to obtain waivers from the restrictions to issue brokered CDs under the Order to meet its obligations and execute its business plans. If unanticipated market factors emerge, or if the Corporation is unable to raise additional capital or complete the identified alternative capital preservation initiatives, successfully execute its plans, or comply with the Order, its banking regulators could take further action, which could include actions that may have a material adverse effect on the Corporation’s business, results of operations and financial position. Also see “Liquidity and Capital Adequacy.”
OVERVIEW OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
     First BanCorp’s results of operations generally depend primarily upon its net interest income, which is the difference between the interest income earned on its interest-earning assets, including investment securities and loans, and the interest expense incurred on its interest-bearing liabilities, including deposits and borrowings. Net interest income is affected by various factors, including: the interest rate scenario; the volumes, mix and composition of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities; and the re-pricing characteristics of these assets and liabilities. The Corporation’s results of operations also depend on the provision for loan and lease losses, which significantly affected the results for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, non-interest expenses (such as personnel, occupancy, insurance premiums and other costs), non-interest income (mainly service charges and fees on loans and deposits and

50


Table of Contents

insurance income), the results of its hedging activities, gains (losses) on sales of investments, gains (losses) on mortgage banking activities, and income taxes.
     Net loss for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 amounted to $90.6 million or $1.05 per diluted common share, compared to net loss of $78.7 million or $1.03 per diluted common share for the quarter ended June 30, 2009. The Corporation’s financial results for the second quarter of 2010, as compared to the second quarter of 2009, were principally impacted by (i) a decrease of $101.9 million in income tax benefit, affected by a non-cash increase of $45.1 million in the Corporation’s deferred tax asset valuation allowance as most of the deferred tax assets created in 2010 were fully reserved, (ii) a decrease of $12.0 million in net interest income mainly resulting from the Corporation’s strategy to deleverage its balance sheet to preserve its capital position and from higher than historical levels of liquidity invested in overnight funding in 2010, and (iii) an increase of $2.6 million in non-interest expenses that was driven by an increase in losses on real estate owned (REO) operations, mainly due to write-downs to the value of repossessed properties, and by charges to the reserve for probable losses on outstanding unfunded loan commitments. These factors were partially offset by (i) a reduction of $88.4 million in the provision for loan and lease losses related to a slower migration of loans to non-performing and/or impaired status, reduced net charge-offs and loan portfolio deleverage, (ii) higher gains on sale of investment securities, mainly U.S. agency mortgage-backed securities, and (iii) reductions in certain expenses categories, including employees’ compensation, occupancy and business promotion expenses.
     The key drivers of the Corporation’s financial results for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 include the following:
    Net interest income for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 was $119.1 million, compared to $131.0 million for the same period in 2009. The decrease is mainly associated with the deleveraging of the Corporation’s balance sheet to preserve its capital position including sales of approximately $2.2 billion of investment securities over the last 12 months, mainly U.S. agency MBS, and loan repayments, in particular, repayments of credit facilities extended to the Puerto Rico Government. Net interest income was also affected by compressions in net interest margin, which on an adjusted tax-equivalent basis decreased to 2.66% for the second quarter of 2010 from 2.92% for the same period in 2009, mainly due to lower yields on investments and the adverse impact of maintaining higher than historical liquidity levels. Approximately $969 million in investment securities were called over the last twelve months and were replaced with lower yielding U.S. agency investment securities. These factors were partially offset by the favorable impact of lower deposit pricing and the strong core deposit growth. Refer to the “Net Interest Income” discussion below for additional information.
 
    For the second quarter of 2010, the Corporation’s provision for loan and lease losses amounted to $146.8 million, compared to $235.2 million for the same period in 2009. Refer to the discussion under “Risk Management” below for an analysis of the allowance for loan and lease losses and non-performing assets and related ratios. The decrease in the provision for 2010 was primarily due to a slower migration of loans to non-performing and/or impaired status, as well as decreases in charge-offs and the overall reduction of the loan portfolio. Much of the decrease in the provision is related to the construction loan portfolio in both the Puerto Rico and Florida market.
 
    The Corporation’s net charge-offs for the second quarter of 2010 were $117.8 million or 3.62% of average loans on an annualized basis, compared to $129.9 million or 3.85% of average loans on an annualized basis for the same period in 2009, a reduction mainly related to the construction loan portfolio. Refer to the “Provision for Loan and Lease Losses” and “Risk Management – Non-performing assets and Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses” sections below for additional information.
 
    For the quarter ended June 30, 2010, the Corporation’s non-interest income amounted to $39.5 million, compared to $23.4 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2009. The increase was mainly due to an increase of $13.9 million on realized gains on the sale of investment securities (mainly U.S. agency MBS), and commissions of $1.3 million related to the Corporation’s broker-dealer businesses. Refer to the “Non Interest Income” discussion below for additional information.
 
    Non-interest expenses for the second quarter of 2010 amounted to $98.6 million, compared to $96.0 million for the same period in 2009. The increase is mainly related to an increase of $4.2 million in losses on REO operations, driven by write-downs and losses on the sale of repossessed properties, a $3.6 million charge to the reserve for probable losses on outstanding unfunded loan commitments, and a $2.3 million increase in professional fees attributed in part to higher legal fees related to collections and foreclosure procedures and mortgage appraisals. This was partially offset by a decrease of $3.5 million in employees’ compensation and the impact in 2009 of a non-recurring $2.6 million charge to property tax expense attributable to the reassessed value of certain properties. Refer to the “Non Interest Expenses” discussion below for additional information.
 
    For the second quarter of 2010, the Corporation recorded an income tax expense of $3.8 million, compared to an income tax benefit of $98.1 million for the same period in 2009. The variance is mainly due to increases in the valuation allowance against deferred tax asset as most of the deferred tax assets created in 2010 was fully reserved. Refer to the “Income Taxes” discussion below for additional information.

51


Table of Contents

    Total assets as of June 30, 2010 amounted to $18.1 billion, a decrease of $1.5 billion compared to total assets as of December 31, 2009. The decrease in total assets was primarily a result of a net decrease of $1.4 billion in the loan portfolio largely attributable to repayments on credit facilities extended to the Puerto Rico government and/or political subdivisions coupled with charge-offs, the sale of non-performing loans and a higher allowance for loan and lease losses. The decrease in assets is consistent with the Corporation’s decision to deleverage its balance sheet to preserve its capital position. Refer to the “Financial Condition and Operating Data” discussion below for additional information.
 
    As of June 30, 2010, total liabilities amounted to $16.7 billion, a decrease of approximately $1.4 billion, as compared to $18.0 billion as of December 31, 2009. The decrease in total liabilities is mainly attributable to a decrease of $900 million in advances from the FED, a $492.2 million reduction in repurchase agreements, mainly maturing short-term repurchase agreements, and a decrease of $455.6 million in brokered certificates of deposit (“CDs”). This was partially offset by an increase of $514.1 million in total non-brokered deposits, mainly core deposits in Florida. Refer to the “Risk Management – Liquidity and Capital Adequacy” discussion below for additional information about the Corporation’s funding sources.
 
    The Corporation’s stockholders’ equity amounted to $1.4 billion as of June 30, 2010, a decrease of $160.8 million compared to the balance as of December 31, 2009, driven by the net loss of $197.6 million for the first half of 2010, partially offset by an increase of $36.8 million in accumulated other comprehensive income. As previously reported, the Corporation decided to suspend the payment of common and preferred dividends, effective with the preferred dividend due for the month of August 2009. As of June 30, 2010, all regulatory capital ratios exceeded the established well-capitalized minimums but, as a result of the Order, FirstBank is considered to be only adequately capitalized based on the definitions on FDIC regulations. Refer to the “Risk Management – Capital” section below for additional information, including information about strategies to increase the Corporation’s common equity.
 
    Total loan production, including purchases, refinancings and draws from existing commitments, for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 was $651 million, compared to $900.4 million for the comparable period in 2009. The decrease in loan production during 2010, as compared to the second quarter of 2009, was reflected in all major loan categories with the exception of auto financing.
 
    Total non-accrual loans as of June 30, 2010 were $1.55 billion, compared to $1.56 billion as of December 31, 2009. The decrease of $13.2 million, or 0.84%, in non-accrual loans from December 31, 2009 was led by decreases in construction and commercial and industrial (“C&I”) loans. Total non-accrual construction loans decreased $12.9 million, or 2%, from December 31, 2009 mainly in connection with charge-offs and the sale of a $52 million loan in Florida. Non-accrual C&I loans decreased by $8.1 million, or 3%, from the end of the year 2009 driven by charge-offs and, to a lesser extent, to loans restored to accrual status based on their compliance with modified terms, in the case of restructured loans, or on their having been brought current and repayment of principal and interest is expected by the Corporation. Non-accrual residential mortgage loans increased by $6.4 million mainly in Puerto Rico, which was negatively impacted by the continued trend of higher unemployment rates affecting consumers, partially offset by a decrease in the Florida portfolio. Non-accrual commercial mortgage loans increased by $3.5 million, mainly in Puerto Rico partially offset by charge-offs. The levels of non-accrual consumer loans, including finance leases, remained stable showing a $2.1 million decrease during the first half of 2010. Refer to the “Risk Management — Non-accruing and Non-performing Assets” section below for additional information.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND PRACTICES
     The accounting principles of the Corporation and the methods of applying these principles conform with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”). The Corporation’s critical accounting policies relate to the 1) allowance for loan and lease losses; 2) other-than-temporary impairments; 3) income taxes; 4) classification and related values of investment securities; 5) valuation of financial instruments; and 6) income recognition on loans. These critical accounting policies involve judgments, estimates and assumptions made by management that affect the amounts recorded for assets and liabilities and for contingent liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from estimates, if different assumptions or conditions prevail. Certain determinations inherently require greater reliance on the use of estimates, assumptions, and judgments and, as such, have a greater possibility of producing results that could be materially different than those originally reported.
     The Corporation’s critical accounting policies are described in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in First BanCorp’s 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K. There have not been any material changes in the Corporation’s critical accounting policies since December 31, 2009.

52


Table of Contents

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Net Interest Income
     Net interest income is the excess of interest earned by First BanCorp on its interest-earning assets over the interest incurred on its interest-bearing liabilities. First BanCorp’s net interest income is subject to interest rate risk due to the re-pricing and maturity mismatch of the Corporation’s assets and liabilities. Net interest income for the quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2010 was $119.1 million and $235.9 million, respectively, compared to $131.0 million and $252.6 million for the comparable periods in 2009. On a tax-equivalent basis and excluding the changes in the fair value of derivative instruments and unrealized gains and losses on liabilities measured at fair value, net interest income for the quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2010 was $122.9 million and $251.4 million, respectively, compared to $142.6 million and $275.0 million for the comparable periods of 2009.
     The following tables include a detailed analysis of net interest income. Part I presents average volumes and rates on an adjusted tax-equivalent basis and Part II presents, also on an adjusted tax-equivalent basis, the extent to which changes in interest rates and changes in volume of interest-related assets and liabilities have affected the Corporation’s net interest income. For each category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, information is provided on changes attributable to (i) changes in volume (changes in volume multiplied by prior period rates), and (ii) changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by prior period volumes). Rate-volume variances (changes in rate multiplied by changes in volume) have been allocated to the changes in volume and rate based upon their respective percentage of the combined totals.
     The net interest income is computed on a tax-equivalent basis (for definition and reconciliation of this non-GAAP measure, refer to discussions below) and excluding: (1) the change in the fair value of derivative instruments and (2) unrealized gains or losses on liabilities measured at fair value.

53


Table of Contents

Part I
                                                 
    Average Volume     Interest income(1) / expense     Average Rate(1)  
Quarter ended June 30,   2010     2009     2010     2009     2010     2009  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
Interest-earning assets:
                                               
 
                                               
Money market & other short-term investments
  $ 849,763     $ 101,819     $ 624     $ 117       0.29 %     0.46 %
Government obligations (2)
    1,422,418       1,540,821       8,157       15,904       2.30 %     4.14 %
Mortgage-backed securities
    3,141,519       4,322,708       35,418       60,012       4.52 %     5.57 %
Corporate bonds
    2,000       7,458       29       202       5.82 %     10.86 %
FHLB stock
    68,857       86,509       575       788       3.35 %     3.65 %
Equity securities
    1,377       1,977             18       0.00 %     3.65 %
 
                                       
Total investments (3)
    5,485,934       6,061,292       44,803       77,041       3.28 %     5.10 %
 
                                       
 
                                               
Residential mortgage loans
    3,547,874       3,425,235       52,806       51,717       5.97 %     6.06 %
Construction loans
    1,445,251       1,626,141       9,132       13,142       2.53 %     3.24 %
C&I and commercial mortgage loans
    6,199,005       6,423,055       65,386       66,801       4.23 %     4.17 %
Finance leases
    305,414       347,732       6,223       7,111       8.17 %     8.20 %
Consumer loans
    1,528,264       1,678,057       44,223       47,436       11.61 %     11.34 %
 
                                       
Total loans (4) (5)
    13,025,808       13,500,220       177,770       186,207       5.47 %     5.53 %
 
                                       
Total interest-earning assets
  $ 18,511,742     $ 19,561,512     $ 222,573     $ 263,248       4.82 %     5.40 %
 
                                       
 
                                               
Interest-bearing liabilities:
                                               
 
                                               
Brokered CDs
  $ 7,210,631     $ 7,051,179     $ 41,499     $ 56,677       2.31 %     3.22 %
Other interest-bearing deposits
    4,919,662       4,146,552       22,267       23,443       1.82 %     2.27 %
Loans payable
    406,044       768,505       1,265       614       1.25 %     0.32 %
Other borrowed funds
    2,882,674       3,862,885       27,080       31,646       3.77 %     3.29 %
FHLB advances
    959,011       1,450,478       7,587       8,317       3.17 %     2.30 %
 
                                       
Total interest-bearing liabilities (6)
  $ 16,378,022     $ 17,279,599     $ 99,698     $ 120,697       2.44 %     2.80 %
 
                                       
Net interest income
                  $ 122,875     $ 142,551                  
 
                                           
 
                                               
Interest rate spread
                                    2.38 %     2.60 %
 
Net interest margin
                                    2.66 %     2.92 %
                                                 
    Average Volume     Interest income(1) / expense     Average Rate(1)  
Six-Month Period Ended June 30,   2010     2009     2010     2009     2010     2009  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
Interest-earning assets:
                                               
 
                                               
Money market & other short-term investments
  $ 877,029     $ 108,314     $ 1,060     $ 208       0.24 %     0.39 %
Government obligations (2)
    1,353,376       1,341,934       16,977       35,505       2.53 %     5.34 %
Mortgage-backed securities
    3,203,535       4,288,731       76,000       123,433       4.78 %     5.80 %
Corporate bonds
    2,000       7,584       58       235       5.85 %     6.25 %
FHLB stock
    68,620       78,856       1,418       1,148       4.17 %     2.94 %
Equity securities
    1,587       2,167       15       36       1.91 %     3.35 %
 
                                       
Total investments (3)
    5,506,147       5,827,586       95,528       160,565       3.50 %     5.56 %
 
                                       
 
                                               
Residential mortgage loans
    3,550,968       3,460,647       106,405       105,766       6.04 %     6.16 %
Construction loans
    1,464,178       1,586,125       17,885       27,244       2.46 %     3.46 %
C&I and commercial mortgage loans
    6,424,543       6,267,792       132,790       130,946       4.17 %     4.21 %
Finance leases
    309,633       353,969       12,566       14,693       8.18 %     8.37 %
Consumer loans
    1,546,732       1,701,580       89,043       96,030       11.61 %     11.38 %
 
                                       
Total loans (4) (5)
    13,296,054       13,370,113       358,689       374,679       5.44 %     5.65 %
 
                                       
Total interest-earning assets
  $ 18,802,201     $ 19,197,699     $ 454,217     $ 535,244       4.87 %     5.62 %
 
                                       
 
                                               
Interest-bearing liabilities:
                                               
 
                                               
Brokered CDs
  $ 7,330,746     $ 7,255,053     $ 85,881     $ 129,510       2.36 %     3.60 %
Other interest-bearing deposits
    4,775,792       4,087,541       43,850       48,635       1.85 %     2.40 %
Loans payable
    604,144       534,331       3,442       960       1.15 %     0.36 %
Other borrowed funds
    2,943,079       3,609,918       54,380       64,568       3.73 %     3.61 %
FHLB advances
    965,269       1,496,949       15,281       16,609       3.19 %     2.24 %
 
                                       
Total interest-bearing liabilities (6)
  $ 16,619,030     $ 16,983,792     $ 202,834     $ 260,282       2.46 %     3.09 %
 
                                       
Net interest income
                  $ 251,383     $ 274,962                  
 
                                           
 
                                               
Interest rate spread
                                    2.41 %     2.53 %
 
                                               
Net interest margin
                                    2.70 %     2.89 %
 
(1)   On an adjusted tax-equivalent basis. The adjusted tax-equivalent yield was estimated by dividing the interest rate spread on exempt assets by 1 less Puerto Rico statutory tax rate as adjusted for changes to enacted tax rates (40.95% for the Corporation’s subsidiaries other than IBEs and 35.95% for the Corporation’s IBEs) and adding to it the cost of interest-bearing liabilities. The tax-equivalent adjustment recognizes the income tax savings when comparing taxable and tax-exempt assets. Management believes that it is a

54


Table of Contents

    standard practice in the banking industry to present net interest income, interest rate spread and net interest margin on a fully tax-equivalent basis. Therefore, management believes these measures provide useful information to investors by allowing them to make peer comparisons. Changes in the fair value of derivative and unrealized gains or losses on liabilities measured at fair value are excluded from interest income and interest expense because the changes in valuation do not affect interest paid or received.
 
(2)   Government obligations include debt issued by government sponsored agencies.
 
(3)   Unrealized gains and losses in available-for-sale securities are excluded from the average volumes.
 
(4)   Average loan balances include the average of non-accrual loans.
 
(5)   Interest income on loans includes $2.5 million and $2.7 million for the second quarter of 2010 and 2009, respectively, and $5.6 million and $5.5 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, of income from prepayment penalties and late fees related to the Corporation’s loan portfolio.
 
(6)   Unrealized gains and losses on liabilities measured at fair value are excluded from the average volumes.

55


Table of Contents

Part II
                                                 
    Quarter ended June 30,     Six-month period ended June 30,  
    2010 compared to 2009     2010 compared to 2009  
    Increase (decrease)     Increase (decrease)  
    Due to:     Due to:  
    Volume     Rate     Total     Volume     Rate     Total  
    (In thousands)     (In thousands)  
Interest income on interest-earning assets:
                                               
 
                                               
Money market & other short-term investments
  $ 706     $ (199 )   $ 507     $ 1,209     $ (357 )   $ 852  
Government obligations
    (1,142 )     (6,605 )     (7,747 )     301       (18,829 )     (18,528 )
Mortgage-backed securities
    (14,573 )     (10,021 )     (24,594 )     (27,994 )     (19,439 )     (47,433 )
Corporate bonds
    (106 )     (67 )     (173 )     (163 )     (14 )     (177 )
FHLB stock
    (151 )     (62 )     (213 )     (183 )     453       270  
Equity securities
    (4 )     (14 )     (18 )     (8 )     (13 )     (21 )
 
                                   
Total investments
    (15,270 )     (16,968 )     (32,238 )     (26,838 )     (38,199 )     (65,037 )
 
                                   
 
                                               
Residential mortgage loans
    1,842       (753 )     1,089       2,753       (2,114 )     639  
Construction loans
    (1,354 )     (2,656 )     (4,010 )     (1,967 )     (7,392 )     (9,359 )
C&I and commercial mortgage loans
    (2,351 )     936       (1,415 )     3,277       (1,433 )     1,844  
Finance leases
    (862 )     (26 )     (888 )     (1,806 )     (321 )     (2,127 )
Consumer loans
    (4,292 )     1,079       (3,213 )     (8,871 )     1,884       (6,987 )
 
                                   
Total loans
    (7,017 )     (1,420 )     (8,437 )     (6,614 )     (9,376 )     (15,990 )
 
                                   
Total interest income
    (22,287 )     (18,388 )     (40,675 )     (33,452 )     (47,575 )     (81,027 )
 
                                   
 
                                               
Interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities:
                                               
 
                                               
Brokered CDs
    1,123       (16,301 )     (15,178 )     1,309       (44,938 )     (43,629 )
Other interest-bearing deposits
    3,947       (5,123 )     (1,176 )     7,334       (12,119 )     (4,785 )
Loans payable
    (712 )     1,363       651       141       2,341       2,482  
Other borrowed funds
    (8,637 )     4,071       (4,566 )     (12,183 )     1,995       (10,188 )
FHLB advances
    (3,361 )     2,631       (730 )     (7,212 )     5,884       (1,328 )
 
                                   
Total interest expense
    (7,640 )     (13,359 )     (20,999 )     (10,611 )     (46,837 )     (57,448 )
 
                                   
Change in net interest income
  $ (14,647 )   $ (5,029 )   $ (19,676 )   $ (22,841 )   $ (738 )   $ (23,579 )
 
                                   
     Portions of the Corporation’s interest-earning assets, mostly investments in obligations of some U.S. Government agencies and sponsored entities, generate interest which is exempt from income tax, principally in Puerto Rico. Also, interest and gains on sales of investments held by the Corporation’s international banking entities are tax-exempt under the Puerto Rico tax law, except for a temporary 5% tax rate imposed by the Puerto Rico Government on IBEs’ net income effective for years that commenced after December 31, 2008 and before January 1, 2012 (refer to the Income Taxes discussion below for additional information). To facilitate the comparison of all interest data related to these assets, the interest income has been converted to an adjusted taxable equivalent basis. The tax equivalent yield was estimated by dividing the interest rate spread on exempt assets by 1 less the Puerto Rico statutory tax rate as adjusted for changes to enacted tax rates (40.95% for the Corporation’s subsidiaries other than IBEs and 35.95% for the Corporation’s IBEs) and adding to it the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities. The computation considers the interest expense disallowance required by Puerto Rico tax law. Refer to the “Income Taxes” discussion below for additional information of the Puerto Rico tax law.
     The presentation of net interest income excluding the effects of the changes in the fair value of the derivative instruments and unrealized gains or losses on liabilities measured at fair value (“valuations”) provides additional information about the Corporation’s net interest income and facilitates comparability and analysis. The changes in the fair value of the derivative instruments and unrealized gains or losses on liabilities measured at fair value have no effect on interest due or interest earned on interest-bearing liabilities or interest-earning assets, respectively, or on interest payments exchanged with derivatives counterparties.

56


Table of Contents

     The following table reconciles net interest income in accordance with GAAP to net interest income excluding valuations, and to net interest income on an adjusted tax-equivalent basis and net interest rate spread and net interest margin on a GAAP basis to these items excluding valuations and on an adjusted tax-equivalent basis:
                                 
    Quarter Ended     Six-Month Period Ended  
(dollars in thousands)   June 30, 2010     June 30, 2009     June 30, 2010     June 30, 2009  
Interest Income — GAAP
  $ 214,864     $ 252,780     $ 435,852     $ 511,103  
Unrealized loss (gain) on derivative instruments
    487       (3,465 )     1,231       (4,240 )
 
                       
Interest income excluding valuations
    215,351       249,315       437,083       506,863  
Tax-equivalent adjustment
    7,222       13,933       17,134       28,381  
 
                       
Interest income on a tax-equivalent basis excluding valuations
    222,573       263,248       454,217       535,244  
 
                               
Interest Expense — GAAP
    95,802       121,766       199,927       258,491  
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivative instruments and liabilities measured at fair value
    3,896       (1,069 )     2,907       1,791  
 
                       
Interest expense excluding valuations
    99,698       120,697       202,834       260,282  
 
                       
 
                               
Net interest income — GAAP
  $ 119,062     $ 131,014     $ 235,925     $ 252,612  
 
                       
 
                               
Net interest income excluding valuations
  $ 115,653     $ 128,618     $ 234,249     $ 246,581  
 
                       
 
                               
Net interest income on a tax-equivalent basis excluding valuations
  $ 122,875     $ 142,551     $ 251,383     $ 274,962  
 
                       
 
                               
Average Interest-Earning Assets
  $ 18,511,742     $ 19,561,512     $ 18,802,201     $ 19,197,699  
 
                               
Average Interest-Bearing Liabilities
  $ 16,378,022     $ 17,279,599     $ 16,619,030     $ 16,983,792  
 
                               
Average rate on interest-earning assets — GAAP
    4.66 %     5.18 %     4.68 %     5.37 %
Average rate on interest-earning assets excluding valuations
    4.66 %     5.11 %     4.69 %     5.32 %
Average rate on interest-earning assets on a tax-equivalent basis and excluding valuations
    4.82 %     5.40 %     4.87 %     5.62 %
 
                               
Average rate on interest-bearing liabilities — GAAP
    2.35 %     2.83 %     2.43 %     3.07 %
Average rate on interest-bearing liabilities excluding valuations
    2.44 %     2.80 %     2.46 %     3.09 %
 
                               
Net interest spread — GAAP
    2.31 %     2.35 %     2.25 %     2.30 %
Net interest spread excluding valuations
    2.22 %     2.31 %     2.23 %     2.23 %
Net interest spread on a tax-equivalent basis and excluding valuations
    2.38 %     2.60 %     2.41 %     2.53 %
 
                               
Net interest margin — GAAP
    2.58 %     2.69 %     2.53 %     2.65 %
Net interest margin excluding valuations
    2.51 %     2.64 %     2.51 %     2.59 %
Net interest margin on a tax-equivalent basis and excluding valuations
    2.66 %     2.92 %     2.70 %     2.89 %
     The following table summarizes the components of the changes in fair values of interest rate swaps and interest rate caps, which are included in interest income:
                                 
    Quarter Ended June 30,     Six-month period ended June 30,  
(In thousands)   2010     2009     2010     2009  
Unrealized (loss) gain on derivatives (economic undesignated hedges):
                               
 
Interest rate caps
  $ (440 )   $ 2,628     $ (1,171 )   $ 2,850  
Interest rate swaps on loans
    (47 )     837       (60 )     1,390  
 
                       
Net unrealized (loss) gain on derivatives (economic undesignated hedges)
  $ (487 )   $ 3,465     $ (1,231 )   $ 4,240  
 
                       

57


Table of Contents

     The following table summarizes the components of the net unrealized gain and loss on derivatives (economic undesignated hedges) and net unrealized gain and loss on liabilities measured at fair value which are included in interest expense:
                                 
    Quarter ended June 30,     Six-month period ended June 30,  
(In thousands)   2010     2009     2010     2009  
Unrealized (gain) loss on derivatives (economic undesignated hedges):
                               
Interest rate swaps and options on brokered CDs and stock index deposits
  $     $ 892     $ 1     $ 5,318  
Interest rate swaps and options on medium-term notes measured at fair value and stock index notes
    (81 )     53       (51 )     163  
 
                       
Net unrealized (gain) loss on derivatives (economic undesignated hedges)
  $ (81 )   $ 945     $ (50 )   $ 5,481  
 
                       
 
                               
Unrealized (gain) loss on liabilities measured at fair value:
                               
 
                               
Unrealized (gain) loss on brokered CDs
          (1,555 )           (8,696 )
Unrealized (gain) loss on medium-term notes
    (3,815 )     1,679       (2,857 )     1,424  
 
                       
Net unrealized (gain) loss on liabilities measured at fair value
  $ (3,815 )   $ 124     $ (2,857 )   $ (7,272 )