As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 17, 2015
Registration No. 333-202530
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM N-2
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
ý PRE-EFFECTIVE AMENDMENT NO. 2
o POST-EFFECTIVE AMENDMENT NO.
ARES CAPITAL CORPORATION
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)
245 Park Avenue, 44th Floor
New York, New York 10167
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
Registrant's Telephone Number, including Area Code: (212) 750-7300
Joshua M. Bloomstein
General Counsel
Ares Capital Corporation
245 Park Avenue, 44th Floor
New York, New York 10167
(212) 750-7300
(Name and Address of Agent for Service)
Copies of information to:
Monica J. Shilling
Proskauer Rose LLP
2049 Century Park East, 32nd Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90067-3206
(310) 557-2900
Approximate Date of Proposed Public Offering:
From time to time after the effective date of this Registration Statement.
If any securities being registered on this form will be offered on a delayed or continuous basis in reliance on Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, other than securities offered in connection with a dividend reinvestment plan, check the following box. ý
It is proposed that this filing will become effective (check appropriate box):
o when declared effective pursuant to section 8(c).
CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
|
||||||||
Title of Securities Being Registered |
Amount Being Registered |
Proposed Maximum Offering Price Per Unit |
Proposed Maximum Aggregate Offering Price(1) |
Amount of Registration Fee |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share(2)(3) |
||||||||
Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value per share(2) |
||||||||
Subscription Rights(2) |
||||||||
Warrants(4) |
||||||||
Debt Securities(5) |
||||||||
Units(6) |
||||||||
Total |
$3,000,000,000(7) | $348,600(8) | ||||||
|
THE REGISTRANT HEREBY AMENDS THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON SUCH DATE OR DATES AS MAY BE NECESSARY TO DELAY ITS EFFECTIVE DATE UNTIL THE REGISTRANT SHALL FILE A FURTHER AMENDMENT WHICH SPECIFICALLY STATES THAT THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT SHALL THEREAFTER BECOME EFFECTIVE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 8(a) OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED, OR UNTIL THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE ON SUCH DATE AS THE COMMISSION, ACTING PURSUANT TO SECTION 8(a), MAY DETERMINE.
The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may not sell these securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and it is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted.
Subject to Completion, dated August 17, 2015
PROSPECTUS
$3,000,000,000
Common Stock
Preferred Stock
Debt Securities
Subscription Rights
Warrants
Units
Ares Capital Corporation is a specialty finance company that is a closed-end, non-diversified management investment company incorporated in Maryland. We have elected to be regulated as a business development company under the Investment Company Act of 1940. Our investment objective is to generate both current income and capital appreciation through debt and equity investments. We invest primarily in first lien senior secured loans (including "unitranche" loans, which are loans that combine both senior and mezzanine debt, generally in a first lien position), second lien senior secured loans and mezzanine debt, which in some cases includes an equity component. To a lesser extent, we also make preferred and/or common equity investments.
We are externally managed by our investment adviser, Ares Capital Management LLC, a subsidiary of Ares Management, L.P., a publicly traded, leading global asset manager. Ares Operations LLC, a subsidiary of Ares Management, L.P., provides certain administrative and other services necessary for us to operate.
Our common stock is traded on The NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol "ARCC." On August 14, 2015 the last reported sales price of our common stock on The NASDAQ Global Select Market was $16.09 per share. The net asset value per share of our common stock at June 30, 2015 (the last date prior to the date of this prospectus on which we determined net asset value) was $16.80.
Investing in our securities involves risks that are described in the "Risk Factors" section beginning on page 22 of this prospectus, including the risk of leverage.
We may offer, from time to time, in one or more offerings or series, up to $3,000,000,000 of our common stock, preferred stock, debt securities, subscription rights to purchase shares of our common stock, warrants representing rights to purchase shares of our common stock, preferred stock or debt securities, or units comprised of any combination of the foregoing, which we refer to, collectively, as the "securities." The preferred stock, debt securities, subscription rights and warrants (including as part of a unit) offered hereby may be convertible or exchangeable into shares of our common stock. The securities may be offered at prices and on terms to be described in one or more supplements to this prospectus. In the event we offer common stock, the offering price per share of our common stock less any underwriting commissions or discounts will generally not be less than the net asset value per share of our common stock at the time we make the offering. However, we may issue shares of our common stock pursuant to this prospectus at a price per share that is less than our net asset value per share (a) in connection with a rights offering to our existing stockholders, (b) with the prior approval of the majority of our common stockholders or (c) under such circumstances as the SEC may permit. This prospectus and the accompanying prospectus supplement concisely provide important information about us that you should know before investing in our securities. Please read this prospectus and the accompanying prospectus supplement before you invest and keep it for future reference. We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. This information is available free of charge by calling us collect at (310) 201-4200 or on our website at www.arescapitalcorp.com. The SEC also maintains a website at www.sec.gov that contains such information.
Neither the SEC nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
This prospectus may not be used to consummate sales of securities unless accompanied by a prospectus supplement.
The date of this prospectus is , 2015.
You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus and the accompanying prospectus supplement. We have not authorized any other person to provide you with different information. If anyone provides you with different or inconsistent information, you should not rely on it. We are not making an offer to sell these securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted. You should assume that the information appearing in this prospectus and the accompanying prospectus supplement is accurate only as of the date on the front cover of this prospectus and the accompanying prospectus supplement, as applicable. Our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects may have changed since that date.
|
Page | |
---|---|---|
Prospectus Summary |
1 | |
The Company |
1 | |
Offerings |
11 | |
Fees and Expenses |
14 | |
Selected Condensed Consolidated Financial Data of Ares Capital |
18 | |
Risk Factors |
22 | |
Forward-Looking Statements |
50 | |
Use of Proceeds |
52 | |
Price Range of Common Stock and Distributions |
54 | |
Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges |
56 | |
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
57 | |
Senior Securities |
101 | |
Business |
104 | |
Portfolio Companies |
120 | |
Management |
136 | |
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions |
166 | |
Control Persons and Principal Stockholders |
167 | |
Determination of Net Asset Value |
169 | |
Dividend Reinvestment Plan |
171 | |
Certain Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations |
173 | |
Description of Securities |
184 | |
Description of Our Capital Stock |
185 | |
Description of Our Preferred Stock |
192 | |
Description of Our Subscription Rights |
193 | |
Description of Our Warrants |
195 | |
Description of Our Debt Securities |
197 | |
Description of Our Units |
209 | |
Sales of Common Stock Below Net Asset Value |
210 | |
Issuance of Warrants or Securities to Subscribe For or Convertible Into Shares of Our Common Stock |
215 | |
Regulation |
216 | |
Custodian, Transfer and Dividend Paying Agent and Registrar |
224 | |
Brokerage Allocation and Other Practices |
224 | |
Plan of Distribution |
225 | |
Legal Matters |
227 | |
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
227 | |
Available Information |
227 | |
Financial Statements |
F-1 |
i
This prospectus is part of a registration statement that we have filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"), using the "shelf" registration process. Under the shelf registration process, we may offer, from time to time, in one or more offerings or series, up to $3,000,000,000 of our common stock, preferred stock, debt securities, subscription rights to purchase shares of our common stock, warrants representing rights to purchase shares of our common stock, preferred stock or debt securities, or units comprised of any combination of the foregoing, on terms to be determined at the time of the offering. The securities may be offered at prices and on terms described in one or more supplements to this prospectus. This prospectus provides you with a general description of the securities that we may offer. Each time we use this prospectus to offer securities, we will provide a prospectus supplement that will contain specific information about the terms of that offering. The prospectus supplement may also add, update or change information contained in this prospectus. Please carefully read this prospectus and the prospectus supplement together with any exhibits and the additional information described under the headings "Available Information" and "Risk Factors" before you make an investment decision.
ii
This summary highlights some of the information contained elsewhere in this prospectus. It is not complete and may not contain all of the information that you may want to consider. You should read carefully the more detailed information set forth under "Risk Factors" and the other information included in this prospectus and the accompanying prospectus supplement. Except where the context suggests otherwise, the terms "we," "us," "our," "the Company" and "Ares Capital" refer to Ares Capital Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries; "Ares Capital Management" and "our investment adviser" refer to Ares Capital Management LLC; "Ares Operations" and "our administrator" refer to Ares Operations LLC; and "Ares" and "Ares Management" refer to Ares Management, L.P. (NYSE: ARES) and its affiliated companies (other than portfolio companies of its affiliated funds).
Overview
Ares Capital, a Maryland corporation, is a specialty finance company that is a closed-end, non-diversified management investment company. We have elected to be regulated as a business development company, or a "BDC," under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder or the "Investment Company Act." We were founded on April 16, 2004, were initially funded on June 23, 2004 and completed our initial public offering on October 8, 2004. We are one of the largest BDCs with approximately $9.1 billion of total assets as of June 30, 2015.
We are externally managed by our investment adviser, Ares Capital Management, a subsidiary of Ares Management, a publicly traded, leading global alternative asset manager. Our administrator, Ares Operations, a subsidiary of Ares Management, provides certain administrative and other services necessary for us to operate.
Our investment objective is to generate both current income and capital appreciation through debt and equity investments. We invest primarily in U.S. middle-market companies, where we believe the supply of primary capital is limited and the investment opportunities are most attractive. However, we may from time to time invest in larger or smaller (in particular, for investments in early-stage and/or venture capital-backed) companies. We generally use the term "middle-market" to refer to companies with annual EBITDA between $10 million and $250 million. As used herein, EBITDA represents net income before net interest expense, income tax expense, depreciation and amortization.
We invest primarily in first lien senior secured loans (including "unitranche" loans, which are loans that combine both senior and mezzanine debt, generally in a first lien position), second lien senior secured loans and mezzanine debt, which in some cases includes an equity component. First and second lien senior secured loans generally are senior debt instruments that rank ahead of subordinated debt of a given portfolio company. Mezzanine debt is subordinated to senior loans and is generally unsecured. Our investments in corporate borrowers generally range between $30 million and $500 million each, investments in project finance/power generation projects generally range between $10 million and $200 million each and investments in early-stage and/or venture capital-backed companies generally range between $1 million and $25 million each. However, the investment sizes may be more or less than these ranges and may vary based on, among other things, our capital availability, the composition of our portfolio and general micro- and macro-economic factors.
To a lesser extent, we also make preferred and/or common equity investments, which have generally been non-control equity investments of less than $20 million (usually in conjunction with a concurrent debt investment). However, we may increase the size or change the nature of these investments.
1
The proportion of these types of investments will change over time given our views on, among other things, the economic and credit environment in which we are operating. In connection with our investing activities, we may make commitments with respect to indebtedness or securities of a potential portfolio company substantially in excess of our final investment. In such situations, while we may initially agree to fund up to a certain dollar amount of an investment, we may subsequently syndicate or sell a portion of such amount (including, without limitation, to vehicles managed by our portfolio company, Ivy Hill Asset Management, L.P. ("IHAM")), such that we are left with a smaller investment than what was reflected in our original commitment. In addition to originating investments, we may also acquire investments in the secondary market (including purchases of a portfolio of investments).
The first and second lien senior secured loans in which we invest generally have stated terms of three to 10 years and the mezzanine debt investments in which we invest generally have stated terms of up to 10 years, but the expected average life of such first and second lien loans and mezzanine debt is generally between three and seven years. However, we may invest in loans and securities with any maturity or duration. The instruments in which we invest typically are not rated by any rating agency, but we believe that if such instruments were rated, they would be below investment grade (rated lower than "Baa3" by Moody's Investors Service, lower than "BBB" by Fitch Ratings or lower than "BBB" by Standard & Poor's Ratings Services), which, under the guidelines established by these entities, is an indication of having predominantly speculative characteristics with respect to the issuer's capacity to pay interest and repay principal. Bonds that are rated below investment grade are sometimes referred to as "high yield bonds" or "junk bonds." We may invest without limit in debt or other securities of any rating, as well as debt or other securities that have not been rated by any nationally recognized statistical rating organization.
We believe that our investment adviser, Ares Capital Management, is able to leverage the current investment platform, resources and existing relationships of Ares Management with financial sponsors, financial institutions, hedge funds and other investment firms to provide us with attractive investment opportunities. In addition to deal flow, the Ares investment platform assists our investment adviser in analyzing, structuring and monitoring investments. Ares has been in existence for over 15 years and its partners have an average of over 24 years of experience in leveraged finance, private equity, distressed debt, commercial real estate finance, investment banking and capital markets. We have access to Ares' investment professionals and administrative professionals, who provide assistance in accounting, finance, legal, compliance, operations, information technology and investor relations. As of June 30, 2015, Ares had over 340 investment professionals and over 500 administrative professionals.
We and General Electric Capital Corporation and GE Global Sponsor Finance LLC (collectively, "GE") also co-invest in first lien senior secured loans of middle-market companies through an unconsolidated vehicle, the Senior Secured Loan Fund LLC, which operates using the name "Senior Secured Loan Program" (the "SSLP").
In April 2015, GE announced its intention to sell most of the assets of General Electric Capital Corporation ("GECC") and to exit certain commercial lending businesses. This sale includes the U.S. Sponsor Finance business, through which GE participates with us in the SSLP. On June 9, 2015, GE announced that it reached an agreement to sell its U.S. Sponsor Finance business to Canada Pension Plan Investment Board ("CPPIB"). GECC has announced its intention to continue to operate the SSLP and to provide us and CPPIB the opportunity to work together on the SSLP on a go-forward basis. GECC has stated that if a mutual agreement between us and CPPIB to partner on the SSLP is not reached, it intends to retain its interest in the SSLP and the SSLP would be wound down in an orderly manner. Given GECC's proposed exit of the U.S. Sponsor Finance business, we notified the SSLP on June 9, 2015 of our election to terminate, effective 90 days thereafter, our obligation to present senior secured lending investment opportunities to the SSLP prior to pursuing such opportunities for ourself. The SSLP continued to make new investments through June 30, 2015 with capital provided by us and GE. Subsequent to June 30, 2015, we and GE may provide capital to
2
support the SSLP's funding of existing commitments and other amounts to its portfolio companies; however, we do not anticipate that we will make any investments in the SSLP related to new portfolio companies. We expect that the aggregate SSLP portfolio will decline over time as loans in the program are repaid or exited, and as a result the portion of our earnings attributable to our investment in the SSLP will decline over time as well.
As of June 30, 2015, the SSLP had available capital of $11.5 billion of which approximately $10.0 billion in aggregate principal amount was funded. As of June 30, 2015, we had agreed to make available to the SSLP approximately $2.4 billion, of which approximately $2.1 billion was funded. The SSLP is capitalized as transactions are completed and all portfolio decisions and generally all other decisions in respect of the SSLP must be approved by an investment committee of the SSLP consisting of representatives of us and GE (with approval from a representative of each required). As of June 30, 2015, our investment in the SSLP was approximately $2.1 billion at fair value (including unrealized appreciation of $10.5 million), which represented approximately 25% of our total portfolio at fair value. As of June 30, 2015, the SSLP had 52 different underlying borrowers. For more information on the SSLP, see "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsPortfolio and Investment ActivitySenior Secured Loan Program."
While our primary focus is to generate current income and capital appreciation through investments in first and second lien senior secured loans and mezzanine debt and, to a lesser extent, equity securities of eligible portfolio companies, we also may invest up to 30% of our portfolio in non-qualifying assets, as permitted by the Investment Company Act. See "Regulation." Specifically, as part of this 30% basket, we may invest in entities that are not considered "eligible portfolio companies" (as defined in the Investment Company Act), including companies located outside of the United States, entities that are operating pursuant to certain exceptions under the Investment Company Act, and publicly traded entities whose public equity market capitalization exceeds the levels provided for under the Investment Company Act.
In the first quarter of 2011, the staff of the SEC (the "Staff") informally communicated to certain BDCs the Staff's belief that certain entities, which would be classified as an "investment company" under the Investment Company Act but for the exception from the definition of "investment company" set forth in Rule 3a-7 promulgated under the Investment Company Act, could not be treated as "eligible portfolio companies" (as defined in Section 2(a)(46) under the Investment Company Act) (i.e., not eligible to be included in a BDC's 70% "qualifying assets" basket). Subsequently, in August 2011 the SEC issued a concept release (the "Concept Release") which stated that "[a]s a general matter, the Commission presently does not believe that Rule 3a-7 issuers are the type of small, developing and financially troubled businesses in which the U.S. Congress intended BDCs primarily to invest" and requested comment on whether or not a 3a-7 issuer should be considered an "eligible portfolio company." We provided a comment letter in respect of the Concept Release and continue to believe that the language of Section 2(a)(46) of the Investment Company Act permits a BDC to treat as "eligible portfolio companies" entities that rely on the 3a-7 exception. However, given the current uncertainty in this area (including the language in the Concept Release) and subsequent discussions with the Staff, we have, solely for purposes of calculating the composition of our portfolio pursuant to Section 55(a) of the Investment Company Act, identified such entities, which include the SSLP, as "non-qualifying assets" should the Staff ultimately disagree with our position.
As of June 30, 2015, our portfolio company, IHAM, an SEC-registered investment adviser, managed 14 vehicles and served as the sub-manager/sub-servicer for three other vehicles (these vehicles managed or sub-managed/sub-serviced by IHAM are collectively referred to as the "IHAM Vehicles"). As of June 30, 2015, IHAM had assets under management of approximately $2.9 billion. As of June 30, 2015, Ares Capital had invested approximately $171.0 million (at amortized cost) in IHAM. In connection with IHAM's registration as a registered investment adviser, on March 30, 2012, we received exemptive relief from the SEC allowing us to, subject to certain conditions, own directly or
3
indirectly up to 100% of IHAM's outstanding equity interests and make additional investments in IHAM. From time to time, IHAM or certain IHAM Vehicles may purchase investments from us or sell investments to us, in each case for a price equal to the fair market value of such investments determined at the time of such transactions. See Note 4 to our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2014 and the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 for more information about IHAM.
Ares Capital Management LLC
Ares Capital Management, our investment adviser, is served by an origination, investment and portfolio management team of over 90 U.S.-based investment professionals as of June 30, 2015 and led by certain partners of the Ares Direct Lending Group: Michael Arougheti, Kipp deVeer, Mitchell Goldstein and Michael Smith. Ares Capital Management leverages off of Ares' investment platform and benefits from the significant capital markets, trading and research expertise of Ares' investment professionals. Ares Capital Management's investment committee has 12 members, including the U.S.-based partners of the Ares Direct Lending Group, certain partners in the Ares Private Equity Group and a partner in the Ares Tradable Credit Group.
MARKET OPPORTUNITY
We believe that current market conditions present attractive opportunities for us to invest in middle-market companies, specifically:
4
COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES
We believe that we have the following competitive advantages over other capital providers to middle-market companies:
The Ares Platform
Ares operates four distinct but complementary investment groups that invest in the tradable credit, direct lending, private equity and real estate markets. We believe Ares' current investment platform provides a competitive advantage in terms of access to origination and marketing activities and diligence for us. In particular, we believe that the Ares platform provides us with an advantage through its deal flow generation and investment evaluation process. Ares' asset management platform also provides additional market information, company knowledge and industry insight that benefit our investment and due diligence process. Ares' professionals maintain extensive financial sponsor and intermediary relationships, which provide valuable insight and access to transactions and information.
Seasoned Management Team
The investment professionals in the Ares Direct Lending Group and members of our investment adviser's investment committee also have significant experience investing across market cycles. This experience also provides us with a competitive advantage in identifying, originating, investing in and managing a portfolio of investments in middle-market companies.
Broad Origination Strategy
We focus on self-originating most of our investments by pursuing a broad array of investment opportunities in middle-market companies, venture capital backed businesses and power generation projects across multiple channels. We also leverage off of the extensive relationships of the broader Ares platform, including relationships with the portfolio companies in the IHAM Vehicles, to identify investment opportunities. We believe that this allows for asset selectivity and that there is a significant relationship between proprietary deal origination and credit performance. We believe that our focus on generating proprietary deal flow and lead investing also gives us greater control over capital structure, deal terms, pricing and documentation and enables us to actively manage our portfolio investments. Moreover, by leading the investment process, we are often able to secure controlling positions in credit tranches, thereby providing additional control in investment outcomes. We also have originated substantial proprietary deal flow from middle-market intermediaries, which often allows us to act as the sole or principal source of institutional capital to the borrower.
Scale and Flexible Transaction Structuring
We believe that being one of the largest BDCs makes us a more desirable and flexible capital provider, especially in competitive markets. We are flexible with the types of investments we make and the terms associated with those investments. We believe this approach and experience enables our investment adviser to identify attractive investment opportunities throughout economic cycles and across a company's capital structure so we can make investments consistent with our stated investment objective and preserve principal while seeking appropriate risk adjusted returns. In addition, we have the flexibility to provide "one stop" financing with the ability to invest capital across the balance sheet and syndicate and hold larger investments than many of our competitors. We believe that the ability to underwrite, syndicate and hold larger investments benefits our stockholders by (a) potentially increasing net income and earnings through syndication, (b) increasing originated deal flow flexibility, (c) broadening market relationships and deal flow, (d) allowing us to optimize our portfolio composition and (e) allowing us to provide capital to a broader spectrum of middle-market companies, which we believe currently have limited access to capital from traditional lending sources. In addition,
5
we believe that the ability to provide capital at every level of the balance sheet provides a strong value proposition to middle-market borrowers and our senior debt capabilities provide superior deal origination and relative value analysis capabilities compared to traditional "mezzanine only" lenders.
Experience with and Focus on Middle-Market Companies
Ares has historically focused on investments in middle-market companies and we benefit from this experience. In sourcing and analyzing deals, our investment adviser benefits from Ares' extensive network of relationships focused on middle-market companies, including management teams, members of the investment banking community, private equity groups and other investment firms with whom Ares has had long-term relationships. We believe this network enables us to identify well-positioned prospective portfolio company investments. The Ares Direct Lending Group works closely with Ares' other investment professionals. As of June 30, 2015, Ares oversaw a portfolio of investments in over 1,000 companies, over 475 structured assets and over 175 properties across over 30 industries, which provides access to an extensive network of relationships and insights into industry trends and the state of the capital markets.
Disciplined Investment Philosophy
In making its investment decisions, our investment adviser has adopted Ares' long-standing, consistent, credit-based investment approach that was developed over 15 years ago by its founders. Specifically, our investment adviser's investment philosophy, portfolio construction and portfolio management involve an assessment of the overall macroeconomic environment and financial markets and company-specific research and analysis. Its investment approach emphasizes capital preservation, low volatility and minimization of downside risk. In addition to engaging in extensive due diligence from the perspective of a long-term investor, our investment adviser's approach seeks to reduce risk in investments by focusing on:
Extensive Industry Focus
We seek to concentrate our investing activities in industries with a history of predictable and dependable cash flows and in which the Ares investment professionals have had extensive investment experience. Ares investment professionals have developed long-term relationships with management teams and management consultants in over 30 industries, and have accumulated substantial information and identified potential trends within these industries. In turn, we benefit from these relationships, information and identification of potential trends in making investments.
OPERATING AND REGULATORY STRUCTURE
Our investment activities are managed by our investment adviser, Ares Capital Management, which is a subsidiary of Ares, and supervised by our board of directors, a majority of whom are independent of Ares and its affiliates. Ares Capital Management is registered under the Investment
6
Advisers Act of 1940, or the "Advisers Act." Under our Amended and Restated Investment Advisory and Management Agreement with Ares Capital Management, referred to herein as our "investment advisory and management agreement," we have agreed to pay Ares Capital Management base management fees based on our total assets, as defined under the Investment Company Act (other than cash and cash equivalents, but including assets purchased with borrowed funds) ("base management fees"), fees based on our net investment income ("income based fees") and fees based on our net capital gains ("capital gains incentive fees"). See "ManagementInvestment Advisory and Management Agreement." Ares Operations provides us with certain administrative and other services necessary for us to operate pursuant to an Amended and Restated Administration Agreement, referred to herein as our "administration agreement." See "ManagementAdministration Agreement."
As a BDC, we are required to comply with certain regulatory requirements. For example, we are not generally permitted to invest in any portfolio company in which a fund managed by Ares or any of its downstream affiliates (other than us and our downstream affiliates) currently has an investment. However, we may co-invest with funds managed by Ares or any of its downstream affiliates, subject to compliance with existing regulatory guidance, applicable regulations and our allocation procedures. Certain types of co-investment transactions would only be permitted pursuant to an exemptive order from the SEC, for which we have applied. Any such order will be subject to certain terms and conditions. Further there is no assurance that this application for exemptive relief will be granted by the SEC.
Also, while we may borrow funds to make investments, our ability to use debt is limited in certain significant aspects. See "BusinessOperating and Regulatory Structure" and "Regulation." In particular, BDC's must have at least 200% asset coverage calculated pursuant to the Investment Company Act (i.e., we are permitted to borrow one dollar for every dollar we have in assets less all liabilities and indebtedness not represented by senior securities issued by us) in order to incur debt or issue preferred stock (which we refer to collectively as "senior securities"), which requires us to finance our investments with at least as much equity as senior securities in the aggregate. Certain of our credit facilities also require that we maintain asset coverage of at least 200%.
In addition, as a consequence of our being a regulated investment company ("RIC") under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code") for U.S. federal income tax purposes our asset growth is dependent on our ability to raise equity capital through the issuance of common stock. RICs generally must distribute substantially all of their investment company taxable income (as defined under the Code) to stockholders as dividends in order to preserve their status as a RIC and not be subject to additional U.S. federal corporate-level taxes. This requirement, in turn, generally prevents us from using our earnings to support our operations including making new investments. See "Certain Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations."
MARKET CONDITIONS
From time to time, capital markets may experience periods of disruption and instability. For example, between 2008 and 2009, the global financial markets experienced stress, volatility, instability, illiquidity and disruption, and as a result, during this time the availability of capital and access to capital markets was limited. While market conditions have experienced relative stability in recent years, there have been continuing periods of volatility and there can be no assurances that adverse market conditions will not repeat themselves in the future. If they do, we could face difficulty raising new capital on attractive terms. Consequently, our operating strategy could be materially and adversely affected. As the global liquidity situation and market conditions evolve, we will continue to monitor and adjust our approach to funding accordingly. See "Risk FactorsRisks Relating to Our BusinessThe capital markets may experience periods of disruption and instability. Such market conditions may materially and adversely affect debt and equity capital markets in the United States, which may have a negative impact on our business and operations."
7
In connection with the prior depressed market conditions of the general economy during the period between 2008 and 2009, the stocks of BDCs as an industry traded at near historic lows as a result of concerns over liquidity, credit quality, leverage restrictions and distribution requirements. In some cases, certain BDCs became "forced sellers" of assets, defaulted on their indebtedness, decreased their distributions to stockholders or announced share repurchase programs. Although we believe that we currently have sufficient capital to fund our investments and operations, if such adverse market conditions repeat themselves, we cannot assure you that the market pressures we may face in the future will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
ACQUISITION OPPORTUNITIES
We believe the volatility in the credit markets over the past several years has increased the likelihood of further consolidation in our industry. To that end, we are evaluating (and expect to continue to evaluate in the future) a number of potential strategic opportunities, including acquisitions of:
We have been in, and from time to time may engage in, discussions with counterparties in respect of various potential strategic acquisition and investment transactions, including potential acquisitions of other finance companies, business development companies and asset managers. Some of these transactions could be material to our business and, if consummated, could be difficult to integrate, result in increased leverage or dilution and/or subject us to unexpected liabilities. However, none of these discussions has progressed to the point at which the consummation of any such transaction could be deemed to be probable or reasonably certain as of the date of this prospectus. Consummation of any such transaction would be subject to completion of due diligence, finalization of key business and financial terms (including price) and negotiation of final definitive documentation as well as a number of other factors and conditions including, without limitation, the approval of our board of directors, any required third party consents and, in certain cases, the approval of our stockholders. We cannot predict how quickly the terms of any such transaction could be finalized, if at all. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that such transaction would be consummated. In connection with evaluating potential strategic acquisition and investment transactions, we have, and may in the future, incur significant expenses for the evaluation and due diligence investigation of these potential transactions.
INDEBTEDNESS
As of June 30, 2015, we had approximately $3.6 billion in aggregate principal amount of total outstanding indebtedness, approximately $3.5 billion aggregate principal amount of which was unsecured indebtedness of Ares Capital and approximately $0.1 billion aggregate principal amount of which was secured indebtedness of our consolidated subsidiaries.
For more information on the Company's debt, see "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsFinancial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources."
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
From July 1, 2015 through July 29, 2015, we made new investment commitments of approximately $427 million, of which $378 million were funded. Of these new commitments, 58% were in first lien senior secured loans and 42% were in second lien senior secured loans. Of the
8
approximately $427 million of new investment commitments, 100% were floating rate. The weighted average yield of debt and other income producing securities funded during the period at amortized cost was 8.2%. We may seek to sell all or a portion of these new investment commitments, although there can be no assurance that we will be able to do so.
From July 1, 2015 through July 29, 2015, we exited approximately $237 million of investment commitments. Of these investment commitments, 73% were first lien senior secured loans, 17% were second lien senior secured loans and 10% were investments in subordinated certificates of the SSLP. Of the approximately $237 million of exited investment commitments, 97% were floating rate and 3% were fixed rate. The weighted average yield of debt and other income producing securities exited or repaid during the period at amortized cost was 8.4%. On the approximately $237 million of investment commitments exited from July 1, 2015 through July 29, 2015, we recognized total net realized gains of approximately $9 million.
In addition, as of July 29, 2015, we had an investment backlog and pipeline of approximately $440 million and $810 million, respectively. Investment backlog includes transactions approved by our investment adviser's investment committee and/or for which a formal mandate, letter of intent or a signed commitment have been issued, and therefore we believe are likely to close. Investment pipeline includes transactions where due diligence and analysis are in process, but no formal mandate, letter of intent or signed commitment have been issued. The consummation of any of the investments in this backlog and pipeline depends upon, among other things, one or more of the following: satisfactory completion of our due diligence investigation of the prospective portfolio company, our acceptance of the terms and structure of such investment and the execution and delivery of satisfactory transaction documentation. In addition, we may sell all or a portion of these investments and certain of these investments may result in the repayment of existing investments. We cannot assure you that we will make any of these investments or that we will sell all or any portion of these investments.
RISK FACTORS
Investing in Ares Capital involves risks. The following is a summary of the principal risks that you should carefully consider before investing in our securities. In addition, see "Risk Factors" beginning on page 22 for a more detailed discussion of the principal risks as well as certain other risks you should carefully consider before deciding to invest in our securities.
9
OUR CORPORATE INFORMATION
Our administrative offices are located at 2000 Avenue of the Stars, 12th Floor, Los Angeles, California 90067, telephone number (310) 201-4200, and our executive offices are located at 245 Park Avenue, 44th Floor, New York, New York 10167, telephone number (212) 750-7300.
10
We may offer, from time to time, in one or more offerings or series, up to $3,000,000,000 of our common stock, preferred stock, debt securities, subscription rights to purchase shares of our common stock, warrants representing rights to purchase shares of our common stock, preferred stock or debt securities, or units comprised of any combination of the foregoing, on terms to be determined at the time of the offering. We will offer our securities at prices and on terms to be set forth in one or more supplements to this prospectus. The offering price per share of our common stock, less any underwriting commissions or discounts, generally will not be less than the net asset value per share of our common stock at the time of an offering. However, we may issue shares of our common stock pursuant to this prospectus at a price per share that is less than our net asset value per share (a) in connection with a rights offering to our existing stockholders, (b) with the prior approval of the majority of our common stockholders or (c) under such other circumstances as the SEC may permit. Any such issuance of shares of our common stock below net asset value may be dilutive to the net asset value of our common stock. See "Risk FactorsRisks Relating to Offerings Pursuant to this Prospectus."
Pursuant to approval granted at a special meeting of stockholders held on April 29, 2015, we currently are permitted to sell or otherwise issue shares of our common stock at a price below net asset value, subject to certain limitations and determinations that must be made by our board of directors. Such stockholder approval expires on April 29, 2016.
We may offer our securities directly to one or more purchasers, including existing stockholders in a rights offering, through agents that we designate from time to time or to or through underwriters or dealers. The prospectus supplement relating to each offering will identify any agents or underwriters involved in the sale of our securities, and will set forth any applicable purchase price, fee, commission or discount arrangement between us and our agents or underwriters or among our underwriters or the basis upon which such amount may be calculated. See "Plan of Distribution." We may not sell any of our securities through agents, underwriters or dealers without delivery of a prospectus supplement describing the method and terms of the offering of our securities.
Set forth below is additional information regarding offerings of our securities:
Use of proceeds |
Unless otherwise specified in a prospectus supplement, we intend to use the net proceeds from the sale of our securities for general corporate purposes, which include, among other things, (a) investing in portfolio companies in accordance with our investment objective and (b) repaying indebtedness. Each supplement to this prospectus relating to an offering will more fully identify the use of the proceeds from such offering. See "Use of Proceeds." | |
Distributions |
We currently intend to pay dividends or make other distributions to our stockholders on a quarterly basis out of assets legally available for distribution. We may also pay additional dividends or make additional distributions to our stockholders from time to time. Our quarterly and additional dividends or distributions, if any, will be determined by our board of directors. For more information, see "Price Range of Common Stock and Distributions." |
11
Taxation |
We have elected to be treated as a RIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As a RIC, we generally will not pay U.S. federal corporate-level income taxes on any income and gain that we distribute to our stockholders as dividends on a timely basis. Among other things, in order to maintain our RIC status, we must meet specified source of income and asset diversification requirements and distribute annually generally an amount equal to at least 90% of our investment company taxable income, out of assets legally available for distribution. See "Risk FactorsRisks Relating to Our BusinessWe may be subject to additional corporate-level income taxes if we fail to maintain our status as a RIC" and "Price Range of Common Stock and Distributions." |
|
Dividend reinvestment plan |
We have a dividend reinvestment plan for our stockholders. This is an "opt out" dividend reinvestment plan. As a result, if we declare a cash dividend, then stockholders' dividends will be automatically reinvested in additional shares of our common stock, unless they specifically "opt out" of the dividend reinvestment plan so as to receive cash. Stockholders whose cash dividends are reinvested in additional shares of our common stock will be subject to the same U.S. federal, state and local tax consequences as stockholders who elect to receive their dividends in cash. See "Dividend Reinvestment Plan." |
|
The NASDAQ Global Select Market symbol |
"ARCC" |
|
Anti-takeover provisions |
Our board of directors is divided into three classes of directors serving staggered three-year terms. This structure is intended to provide us with a greater likelihood of continuity of management, which may be necessary for us to realize the full value of our investments. A staggered board of directors also may serve to deter hostile takeovers or proxy contests, as may certain other measures adopted by us. See "Description of Our Capital Stock." |
|
Leverage |
We borrow funds to make additional investments. We use this practice, which is known as "leverage," to attempt to increase returns to our stockholders, but it involves significant risks. See "Risk Factors," "Senior Securities" and "RegulationIndebtedness and Senior Securities." With certain limited exceptions, we are only allowed to borrow amounts such that our asset coverage, as calculated pursuant to the Investment Company Act, equals at least 200% after such borrowing. The amount of leverage that we employ at any particular time will depend on our investment adviser's and our board of directors' assessments of market and other factors at the time of any proposed borrowing. |
12
Management arrangements |
Ares Capital Management serves as our investment adviser. Ares Operations serves as our administrator. For a description of Ares Capital Management, Ares Operations, Ares and our contractual arrangements with these companies, see "ManagementInvestment Advisory and Management Agreement," and "Administration Agreement." |
|
Available information |
We are required to file periodic reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. This information is available free of charge by calling us collect at (310) 201-4200 or on our website at www.arescapitalcorp.com. Information contained on our website is not incorporated into this prospectus and you should not consider such information to be part of this prospectus. Such information is also available from the EDGAR database on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov. |
13
The following table is intended to assist you in understanding the costs and expenses that an investor in our common stock will bear, directly or indirectly, based on the assumptions set forth below. We caution you that some of the percentages indicated in the table below are estimates and may vary. Except where the context suggests otherwise, whenever this table contains a reference to our fees or expenses, we will pay such fees and expenses out of our net assets and, consequently, stockholders will indirectly bear such fees or expenses as investors in Ares Capital.
Stockholder transaction expenses (as a percentage of offering price): |
||||
Sales load |
| (1) | ||
Offering expenses |
| (2) | ||
Dividend reinvestment plan expenses |
None | (3) | ||
| | | | |
Total stockholder transaction expenses paid |
| (4) | ||
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
Annual expenses (as a percentage of consolidated net assets attributable to common stock)(5): |
||||
Base management fees |
2.61% | (6) | ||
Income based fees and capital gains incentive fees |
2.30% | (7) | ||
Interest payments on borrowed funds |
4.40% | (8) | ||
Other expenses |
1.10% | (9) | ||
Acquired fund fees and expenses |
0.01% | (10) | ||
| | | | |
Total annual expenses |
10.42% | (11) | ||
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
14
15
incentive fees are carried over for payment in subsequent calculation periods to the extent such payment is payable under the investment advisory and management agreement.
Example
The following example demonstrates the projected dollar amount of total cumulative expenses over various periods with respect to a hypothetical investment in our common stock. In calculating the following expense amounts, we have assumed that we would have no additional leverage, that none of our assets are cash or cash equivalents, and that our annual operating expenses would remain at the levels set forth in the table above. Income based fees and the capital gains incentive fees under the
16
investment advisory and management agreement, which, assuming a 5% annual return, would either not be payable or have an insignificant impact on the expense amounts shown below, are not included in the example, except as specifically set forth below. Transaction expenses are not included in the following example. In the event that shares to which this prospectus relates are sold to or through underwriters, a corresponding prospectus supplement will restate this example to reflect the applicable sales load.
|
1 year | 3 years | 5 years | 10 years | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
You would pay the following expenses on a $1,000 common stock investment, assuming a 5% annual return (none of which is subject to the capital gains incentive fee)(1) |
$ | 83 | $ | 241 | $ | 389 | $ | 718 | |||||
You would pay the following expenses on a $1,000 common stock investment, assuming a 5% annual return resulting entirely from net realized capital gains (all of which is subject to the capital gains incentive fee)(2) |
$93 | $ | 269 | $ | 432 | $ | 789 |
The foregoing table is to assist you in understanding the various costs and expenses that an investor in our common stock will bear directly or indirectly. While the example assumes, as required by the SEC, a 5% annual return, our performance will vary and may result in a return greater or less than 5%. If we achieve sufficient returns on our investments, including through the realization of capital gains, to trigger income based fees or capital gains incentive fees of a material amount, our expenses, and returns to our investors, would be higher. In addition, while the example assumes reinvestment of all dividends and distributions at net asset value, if our board of directors authorizes and we declare a cash dividend, participants in our dividend reinvestment plan who have not otherwise elected to receive cash will receive a number of shares of our common stock, determined by dividing the total dollar amount of the dividend payable to a participant by the market price per share of our common stock at the close of trading on the valuation date for the dividend. See "Dividend Reinvestment Plan" for additional information regarding our dividend reinvestment plan.
This example and the expenses in the table above should not be considered a representation of our future expenses as actual expenses (including the cost of debt, if any, and other expenses) that we may incur in the future and such actual expenses may be greater or less than those shown.
17
SELECTED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA OF ARES CAPITAL
The following selected financial and other data as of and for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, 2012, 2011 and 2010 are derived from our consolidated financial statements, which have been audited by KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm whose report thereon is included elsewhere in this prospectus. The selected financial and other data for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and other quarterly financial information is derived from our unaudited financial statements, but in the opinion of management, reflects all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) that are necessary to present fairly the results of such interim periods. Interim results as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2015 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2015. The data should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and "Senior Securities," which are included elsewhere in this prospectus or the accompanying prospectus supplement.
18
ARES CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
As of and For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and
As of and For the Years Ended December 31, 2014, 2013, 2012, 2011 and 2010
(dollar amounts in millions, except per share data and as otherwise indicated)
|
As of and For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 |
As of and For the Year Ended December 31, 2014 |
As of and For the Year Ended December 31, 2013 |
As of and For the Year Ended December 31, 2012 |
As of and For the Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
As of and For the Year Ended December 31, 2010 |
|||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Investment Income |
$ | 502.7 | $ | 989.0 | $ | 881.7 | $ | 748.0 | $ | 634.5 | $ | 483.4 | |||||||
Total Expenses |
266.4 | 532.9 | 437.2 | 387.9 | 344.6 | 262.2 | |||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Investment Income Before Income Taxes |
236.3 | 456.1 | 444.5 | 360.1 | 289.9 | 221.2 | |||||||||||||
Income Tax Expense, Including Excise Tax |
6.1 | 18.3 | 14.1 | 11.2 | 7.5 | 5.4 | |||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Investment Income |
230.2 | 437.8 | 430.4 | 348.9 | 282.4 | 215.8 | |||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gains on Investments, Foreign Currencies, Extinguishment of Debt and Other Assets |
16.9 | 153.2 | 58.1 | 159.3 | 37.1 | 280.1 | |||||||||||||
Gain on the Allied Acquisition |
| | | | | 195.9 | |||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Increase in Stockholders' Equity Resulting from Operations |
$ | 247.1 | $ | 591.0 | $ | 488.5 | $ | 508.2 | $ | 319.5 | $ | 691.8 | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Per Share Data: |
|||||||||||||||||||
Net Increase in Stockholder's Equity Resulting from Operations: |
|||||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.79 | $ | 1.94 | $ | 1.83 | $ | 2.21 | $ | 1.56 | $ | 3.91 | |||||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.79 | $ | 1.94 | $ | 1.83 | $ | 2.21 | $ | 1.56 | $ | 3.91 | |||||||
Cash Dividends Declared and Payable(1) |
$ | 0.81 | $ | 1.57 | $ | 1.57 | $ | 1.60 | $ | 1.41 | $ | 1.40 | |||||||
Net Asset Value |
$ | 16.80 | $ | 16.82 | $ | 16.46 | $ | 16.04 | $ | 15.34 | $ | 14.92 | |||||||
Total Assets |
$ | 9,124.9 | $ | 9,497.8 | $ | 8,141.5 | $ | 6,401.2 | $ | 5,387.4 | $ | 4,562.5 | |||||||
Total Debt (Carrying Value) |
$ | 3,582.2 | $ | 3,924.5 | $ | 2,986.3 | $ | 2,195.9 | $ | 2,073.6 | $ | 1,378.5 | |||||||
Total Debt (Principal Amount) |
$ | 3,648.6 | $ | 3,999.3 | $ | 3,078.8 | $ | 2,293.8 | $ | 2,170.5 | $ | 1,435.1 | |||||||
Total Stockholders' Equity |
$ | 5,282.4 | $ | 5,283.7 | $ | 4,904.4 | $ | 3,988.3 | $ | 3,147.3 | $ | 3,050.5 | |||||||
Other Data: |
|||||||||||||||||||
Number of Portfolio Companies at Period End(2) |
207 | 205 | 193 | 152 | 141 | 170 | |||||||||||||
Principal Amount of Investments Purchased |
$ | 1,395.4 | $ | 4,534.3 | $ | 3,493.2 | $ | 3,161.6 | $ | 3,239.0 | $ | 1,583.9 | |||||||
Principal Amount of Investments Acquired as part of the Allied Acquisition |
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 1,833.8 | |||||||
Principal Amount of Investments Sold and Repayments |
$ | 1,830.6 | $ | 3,212.8 | $ | 1,801.4 | $ | 2,482.9 | $ | 2,468.2 | $ | 1,555.9 | |||||||
Total Return Based on Market Value(3) |
10.6 | % | (3.3 | )% | 10.5 | % | 23.6 | % | 2.3 | % | 43.6 | % | |||||||
Total Return Based on Net Asset Value(4) |
4.7 | % | 11.8 | % | 11.4 | % | 14.3 | % | 10.5 | % | 31.6 | % | |||||||
Weighted Average Yield of Debt and Other Income Producing Securities at Fair Value(5): |
10.6 | % | 10.1 | % | 10.4 | % | 11.3 | % | 12.0 | % | 12.9 | % | |||||||
Weighted Average Yield of Debt and Other Income Producing Securities at Amortized Cost(5): |
10.6 | % | 10.1 | % | 10.4 | % | 11.4 | % | 12.1 | % | 13.2 | % |
19
December 31, 2012 of $17.50 per share plus the declared and payable dividends of $1.57 per share for the year ended December 31, 2013, divided by the market value at December 31, 2012. For the year ended December 31, 2012, the total return based on market value equaled the increase of the ending market value at December 31, 2012 of $17.50 per share from the ending market value at December 31, 2011 of $15.45 per share plus the declared and payable dividends of $1.60 per share for the year ended December 31, 2012, divided by the market value at December 31, 2011. For the year ended December 31, 2011, the total return based on market value equaled the decrease of the ending market value at December 30, 2011 of $15.45 per share from the ending market value at December 31, 2010 of $16.48 per share plus the declared and payable dividends of $1.41 per share for the year ended December 31, 2011, divided by the market value at December 31, 2010. For the year ended December 31, 2010, the total return based on market value equaled the increase of the ending market value at December 31, 2010 of $16.48 per share from the ending market value at December 31, 2009 of $12.45 per share plus the declared and payable dividends of $1.40 per share for the year ended December 31, 2010, divided by the market value at December 31, 2009. The Company's shares fluctuate in value. The Company's performance changes over time and currently may be different than that shown. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
20
SELECTED QUARTERLY DATA (Unaudited)
(dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
|
2015 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Q2 | Q1 | |||||||||||
Total investment income |
$ | 249,479 | $ | 253,247 | |||||||||
Net investment income before net realized and unrealized losses and income based fees and capital gains incentive fees |
$ | 145,134 | $ | 146,822 | |||||||||
Income based fees and capital gains incentive fees |
$ | 36,631 | $ | 25,145 | |||||||||
Net investment income before net realized and unrealized losses |
$ | 108,503 | $ | 121,677 | |||||||||
Net realized and unrealized losses |
$ | 38,019 | $ | (21,101 | ) | ||||||||
Net increase in stockholders' equity resulting from operations |
$ | 146,522 | $ | 100,576 | |||||||||
Basic and diluted earnings per common share |
$ | 0.47 | $ | 0.32 | |||||||||
Net asset value per share as of the end of the quarter |
$ | 16.80 | $ | 16.71 |
|
2014 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | |||||||||
Total investment income |
$ | 270,917 | $ | 253,396 | $ | 224,927 | $ | 239,719 | |||||
Net investment income before net realized and unrealized gains and income based fees and capital gains incentive fees |
$ | 166,532 | $ | 149,722 | $ | 127,699 | $ | 141,589 | |||||
Income based fees and capital gains incentive fees |
$ | 38,347 | $ | 44,432 | $ | 35,708 | $ | 29,253 | |||||
Net investment income before net realized and unrealized gains |
$ | 128,185 | $ | 105,290 | $ | 91,991 | $ | 112,336 | |||||
Net realized and unrealized gains |
$ | 25,202 | $ | 72,449 | $ | 50,840 | $ | 4,656 | |||||
Net increase in stockholders' equity resulting from operations |
$ | 153,387 | $ | 177,739 | $ | 142,831 | $ | 116,992 | |||||
Basic and diluted earnings per common share |
$ | 0.49 | $ | 0.57 | $ | 0.48 | $ | 0.39 | |||||
Net asset value per share as of the end of the quarter |
$ | 16.82 | $ | 16.71 | $ | 16.52 | $ | 16.42 |
|
2013 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | |||||||||
Total investment income |
$ | 233,742 | $ | 246,801 | $ | 206,123 | $ | 195,055 | |||||
Net investment income before net realized and unrealized gains (losses) and income based fees and capital gains incentive fees |
$ | 145,003 | $ | 161,421 | $ | 126,951 | $ | 119,182 | |||||
Income based fees and capital gains incentive fees |
$ | 33,493 | $ | 35,199 | $ | 33,374 | $ | 20,085 | |||||
Net investment income before net realized and unrealized gains (losses) |
$ | 111,510 | $ | 126,222 | $ | 93,577 | $ | 99,097 | |||||
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) |
$ | 22,374 | $ | 14,575 | $ | 39,921 | $ | (18,755 | ) | ||||
Net increase in stockholders' equity resulting from operations |
$ | 133,884 | $ | 140,797 | $ | 133,498 | $ | 80,342 | |||||
Basic and diluted earnings per common share |
$ | 0.47 | $ | 0.52 | $ | 0.50 | $ | 0.32 | |||||
Net asset value per share as of the end of the quarter |
$ | 16.46 | $ | 16.35 | $ | 16.21 | $ | 15.98 |
21
You should carefully consider the risk factors described below, together with all of the other information included in this prospectus and the accompanying prospectus supplement, including our consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto, before you decide whether to make an investment in our securities. The risks set out below are not the only risks we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results. If any of the following events occur, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. In such case, the net asset value of our common stock and the trading price of our securities could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment.
RISKS RELATING TO OUR BUSINESS
The capital markets may experience periods of disruption and instability. Such market conditions may materially and adversely affect debt and equity capital markets, which may have a negative impact on our business and operations.
From time to time, capital markets may experience periods of disruption and instability. For example, between 2008 and 2009, the global capital markets were unstable as evidenced by periodic disruptions in liquidity in the debt capital markets, significant write-offs in the financial services sector, the re-pricing of credit risk in the broadly syndicated credit market and the failure of major financial institutions. Despite actions of the U.S. federal government and foreign governments, these events contributed to worsening general economic conditions that materially and adversely impacted the broader financial and credit markets and reduced the availability of debt and equity capital for the market as a whole and financial services firms in particular. While market conditions have experienced relative stability in recent years, there have been continuing periods of volatility and there can be no assurance that adverse market conditions will not repeat themselves in the future.
Equity capital may be difficult to raise during periods of adverse or volatile market conditions because, subject to some limited exceptions, as a BDC, we are generally not able to issue additional shares of our common stock at a price less than net asset value without first obtaining approval for such issuance from our stockholders and our independent directors. We generally seek approval from our stockholders so that we have the flexibility to issue up to 25% of our then outstanding shares of our common stock at a price below net asset value. Pursuant to approval granted at a special meeting of stockholders held on April 29, 2015, we currently are permitted to sell or otherwise issue shares of our common stock at a price below net asset value, subject to certain limitations and determinations that must be made by our board of directors. Such stockholder approval expires on April 29, 2016.
At times, volatility and dislocation in the capital markets can also create a challenging environment in which to raise or access debt capital. The re-appearance of market conditions similar to those experienced from 2008 through 2009 for any substantial length of time could make it difficult to extend the maturity of or refinance our existing indebtedness or obtain new indebtedness with similar terms and any failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on our business. The debt capital that will be available to us in the future, if at all, may be at a higher cost and on less favorable terms and conditions than what we currently experience.
If we are unable to raise or refinance debt, then our equity investors may not benefit from the potential for increased returns on equity resulting from leverage and we may be limited in our ability to make new commitments or to fund existing commitments to our portfolio companies. Significant changes or volatility in the capital markets may also have a negative effect on the valuations of our investments. While most of our investments are not publicly traded, applicable accounting standards require us to assume as part of our valuation process that our investments are sold in a principal market to market participants (even if we plan on holding an investment through its maturity).
22
Significant changes in the capital markets may also affect the pace of our investment activity and the potential for liquidity events involving our investments. Thus, the illiquidity of our investments may make it difficult for us to sell such investments to access capital if required, and as a result, we could realize significantly less than the value at which we have recorded our investments if we were required to sell them for liquidity purposes. An inability to raise or access capital could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Uncertainty about the financial stability of the United States and of several countries in the European Union (EU) and China could have a significant adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Due to federal budget deficit concerns, S&P downgraded the federal government's credit rating from AAA to AA+ for the first time in history on August 5, 2011. Further, Moody's and Fitch had warned that they may downgrade the federal government's credit rating. Further downgrades or warnings by S&P or other rating agencies, and the United States government's credit and deficit concerns in general, could cause interest rates and borrowing costs to rise, which may negatively impact both the perception of credit risk associated with our debt portfolio and our ability to access the debt markets on favorable terms. In addition, a decreased U.S. government credit rating could create broader financial turmoil and uncertainty, which may weigh heavily on our financial performance and the value of our common stock.
In 2010, a financial crisis emerged in Europe, triggered by high budget deficits and rising direct and contingent sovereign debt in Greece, Ireland, Italy, Portugal and Spain, which created concerns about the ability of these nations to continue to service their sovereign debt obligations. While the financial stability of many of such countries has improved significantly, risks resulting from any future debt crisis in Europe or any similar crisis could have a detrimental impact on the global economic recovery, sovereign and non-sovereign debt in these countries and the financial condition of European financial institutions. In July and August 2015, Greece reached agreements with its international creditors for bailouts that provide aid in exchange for austerity terms that had previously been rejected by Greek voters. Market and economic disruptions have affected, and may in the future affect, consumer confidence levels and spending, personal bankruptcy rates, levels of incurrence and default on consumer debt and home prices, among other factors. We cannot assure you that market disruptions in Europe, including the increased cost of funding for certain governments and financial institutions, will not impact the global economy, and we cannot assure you that assistance packages will be available, or if available, be sufficient to stabilize countries and markets in Europe or elsewhere affected by a financial crisis. To the extent uncertainty regarding any economic recovery in Europe negatively impacts consumer confidence and consumer credit factors, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be significantly and adversely affected.
In the second quarter of 2015, stock prices in China experienced a significant drop, resulting primarily from continued sell-off of shares trading in Chinese markets. In August 2015, Chinese authorities sharply devalued China's currency. These market and economic disruptions affected, and may in the future affect, the U.S. capital markets, which could adversely affect our business.
In October 2014, the Federal Reserve announced that it was concluding its bond-buying program, or quantitative easing, which was designed to stimulate the economy and expand the Federal Reserve's holdings of long-term securities, suggesting that key economic indicators, such as the unemployment rate, had showed signs of improvement since the inception of the program. It is unclear what effect, if any, the conclusion of the Federal Reserve's bond-buying program will have on the value of our investments. However, it is possible that, without quantitative easing by the Federal Reserve, these developments, along with the United States government's credit and deficit concerns and the European sovereign debt crisis, could cause interest rates and borrowing costs to rise, which may negatively impact our ability to access the debt markets on favorable terms. Additionally, in July 2015,
23
the Federal Reserve reaffirmed its view that the current target range for the federal funds rate was appropriate based on current economic conditions and that it would be appropriate to raise the rate when economic conditions improve further. However, if key economic indicators, such as the unemployment rate or inflation, do not progress at a rate consistent with the Federal Reserve's objectives, the target range for the federal funds rate may increase and cause interest rates and borrowing costs to rise, which may negatively impact our ability to access the debt markets on favorable terms.
A failure on our part to maintain our status as a BDC would significantly reduce our operating flexibility.
If we fail to maintain our status as a BDC, we might be regulated as a closed-end investment company that is required to register under the Investment Company Act, which would subject us to additional regulatory restrictions and significantly decrease our operating flexibility. In addition, any such failure could cause an event of default under our outstanding indebtedness, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
We are dependent upon certain key personnel of Ares for our future success and upon their access to other Ares investment professionals.
We depend on the diligence, skill and network of business contacts of certain key personnel of the Ares Direct Lending Group. We also depend, to a significant extent, on access to the investment professionals of other groups within Ares and the information and deal flow generated by Ares' investment professionals in the course of their investment and portfolio management activities. Our future success depends on the continued service of the key personnel of the Ares Direct Lending Group. The departure of any of these individuals, or of a significant number of the investment professionals or partners of Ares, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. In addition, we cannot assure you that Ares Capital Management will remain our investment adviser or that we will continue to have access to Ares' investment professionals or its information and deal flow. Further, there can be no assurance that Ares Capital will replicate its own or Ares' historical success, and we caution you that our investment returns could be substantially lower than the returns achieved by other Ares managed funds.
Our financial condition and results of operations depend on our ability to manage future growth effectively.
Our ability to achieve our investment objective depends on our ability to acquire suitable investments and monitor and administer those investments, which depends, in turn, on our investment adviser's ability to identify, invest in and monitor companies that meet our investment criteria.
Accomplishing this result on a cost-effective basis is largely a function of the structuring of our investment process and the ability of our investment adviser to provide competent, attentive and efficient services to us. Our executive officers and the members of our investment adviser's investment committee have substantial responsibilities in connection with their roles at Ares and with the other Ares funds, as well as responsibilities under the investment advisory and management agreement. They may also be called upon to provide significant managerial assistance to certain of our portfolio companies. These demands on their time, which will increase as the number of investments grow, may distract them or slow the rate of investment. In order to grow, Ares will need to hire, train, supervise, manage and retain new employees. However, we cannot assure you that Ares will be able to do so effectively. Any failure to manage our future growth effectively could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
24
In addition, as we grow, we may open up new offices in new geographic regions that may increase our direct operating expenses without corresponding revenue growth.
Our ability to grow depends on our ability to raise capital.
We will need to periodically access the capital markets to raise cash to fund new investments in excess of our repayments, and, beginning in 2016, we may also need to access the capital markets to refinance existing debt obligations to the extent such maturing obligations are not repaid with cash flows from operations. We have elected to be treated as a RIC and operate in a manner so as to qualify for the U.S. federal income tax treatment applicable to RICs. Among other things, in order to maintain our RIC status, we must distribute to our stockholders on a timely basis generally an amount equal to at least 90% of our investment company taxable income, and, as a result, such distributions will not be available to fund investment originations or repay maturing debt. We must continue to borrow from financial institutions and issue additional securities to fund our growth. Unfavorable economic or capital market conditions may increase our funding costs or limit our access to the capital markets, or could result in a decision by lenders not to extend credit to us. An inability to successfully access the capital markets may limit our ability to refinance our existing debt obligations as they become due and/or to fully execute our business strategy and could limit our ability to grow or cause us to have to shrink the size of our business, which could decrease our earnings, if any.
In addition, with certain limited exceptions, we are only allowed to borrow amounts or issue debt securities or preferred stock, which we refer to collectively as "senior securities," such that our asset coverage, as calculated pursuant to the Investment Company Act, equals at least 200% immediately after such borrowing, which, in certain circumstances, may restrict our ability to borrow or issue debt securities or preferred stock. The amount of leverage that we employ will depend on our investment adviser's and our board of directors' assessments of market and other factors at the time of any proposed borrowing or issuance of senior securities. We cannot assure you that we will be able to maintain our current Facilities (as defined below), obtain other lines of credit or issue senior securities at all or on terms acceptable to us.
Regulations governing our operation as a BDC affect our ability to, and the way in which we, raise additional capital.
We may issue senior securities or borrow money from banks or other financial institutions, up to the maximum amount permitted by the Investment Company Act. Under the provisions of the Investment Company Act, we are permitted, as a BDC, to incur indebtedness or issue senior securities only in amounts such that our asset coverage, as calculated pursuant to the Investment Company Act, equals at least 200% after each such incurrence or issuance. If the value of our assets declines, we may be unable to satisfy this test, which may prohibit us from paying dividends and could prevent us from maintaining our status as a RIC or may prohibit us from repurchasing shares of our common stock. In addition, our inability to satisfy this test could cause an event of default under our existing indebtedness. If we cannot satisfy this test, we may be required to sell a portion of our investments at a time when such sales may be disadvantageous and, depending on the nature of our leverage, repay a portion of our indebtedness. Accordingly, any failure to satisfy this test could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. As of June 30, 2015, our asset coverage calculated in accordance with the Investment Company Act was 247%. Also, to generate cash for funding new investments, we may in the future seek to issue additional debt or to securitize certain of our loans. The Investment Company Act may impose restrictions on the structure of any such securitization.
We are not generally able to issue and sell our common stock at a price below net asset value per share. We may, however, sell our common stock, or warrants, options or rights to acquire our common stock, at a price below the current net asset value per share of our common stock if our board
25
of directors determines that such sale is in our best interests and the best interests of our stockholders, and our stockholders approve such sale. Any such sale would be dilutive to the net asset value per share of our common stock. In any such case, the price at which our securities are to be issued and sold may not be less than a price that, in the determination of our board of directors, closely approximates the market value of such securities (less any commission or discount). If our common stock trades at a discount to net asset value, this restriction could adversely affect our ability to raise capital.
Pursuant to approval granted at a special meeting of stockholders held on April 29, 2015, we currently are permitted to sell or otherwise issue shares of our common stock at a price below net asset value, subject to certain limitations and determinations that must be made by our board of directors. Such stockholder approval expires on April 29, 2016.
We borrow money, which magnifies the potential for gain or loss on amounts invested and may increase the risk of investing with us.
Borrowings, also known as leverage, magnify the potential for gain or loss on amounts invested and, therefore, increase the risks associated with investing in our securities. We currently borrow under our Facilities and have issued or assumed other senior securities, and in the future may borrow from, or issue additional senior securities to, banks, insurance companies, funds, institutional investors and other lenders and investors. Lenders and holders of such senior securities have fixed dollar claims on our consolidated assets that are superior to the claims of our common stockholders or any preferred stockholders. If the value of our consolidated assets increases, then leveraging would cause the net asset value per share of our common stock to increase more sharply than it would have had we not incurred leverage.
Conversely, if the value of our consolidated assets decreases, leveraging would cause net asset value to decline more sharply than it otherwise would have had we not incurred leverage. Similarly, any increase in our consolidated income in excess of consolidated interest payable on the borrowed funds would cause our net income to increase more than it would had we not incurred leverage, while any decrease in our consolidated income would cause net income to decline more sharply than it would have had we not incurred leverage. Such a decline could negatively affect our ability to make common stock dividend payments. There can be no assurance that a leveraging strategy will be successful.
As of June 30, 2015, we had approximately $134.0 million of outstanding borrowings under the Facilities, approximately $15.0 million in aggregate principal amount outstanding of the SBA Debentures (as defined below), approximately $1,537.5 million in aggregate principal amount outstanding of the Convertible Unsecured Notes (as defined below) and approximately $1,962.1 million in aggregate principal amount outstanding of the Unsecured Notes (as defined below). In order for us to cover our annual interest payments on our outstanding indebtedness at June 30, 2015, we must achieve annual returns on our June 30, 2015 total assets of at least 2.0%. The weighted average stated interest rate charged on our principal amount of outstanding indebtedness as of June 30, 2015 was 5.0%. We intend to continue borrowing under the Facilities in the future and we may increase the size of the Facilities or issue additional debt securities or other evidences of indebtedness (although there can be no assurance that we will be successful in doing so). For more information on our indebtedness, see "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsFinancial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources." Our ability to service our debt depends largely on our financial performance and is subject to prevailing economic conditions and competitive pressures. The amount of leverage that we employ at any particular time will depend on our investment adviser's and our board of directors' assessments of market and other factors at the time of any proposed borrowing.
26
The Facilities, the SBA Debentures, the Convertible Unsecured Notes and the Unsecured Notes impose financial and operating covenants that restrict our business activities, including limitations that could hinder our ability to finance additional loans and investments or to make the distributions required to maintain our status as a RIC. A failure to renew the Facilities or to add new or replacement debt facilities or to issue additional debt securities or other evidences of indebtedness could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The following table illustrates the effect on return to a holder of our common stock of the leverage created by our use of borrowing at the weighted average stated interest rate of 5.0% as of June 30, 2015, together with (a) our total value of net assets as of June 30, 2015; (b) approximately $3,648.6 million in aggregate principal amount of indebtedness outstanding as of June 30, 2015 and (c) hypothetical annual returns on our portfolio of minus 15% to plus 15%.
Assumed Return on Portfolio (Net of Expenses)(1) |
-15 | % | -10 | % | -5 | % | 0 | % | 5 | % | 10 | % | 15 | % | ||||||||
Corresponding Return to Common Stockholders(2) |
-29.39 | % | -20.76 | % | -12.12 | % | -3.48 | % | 5.15 | % | 13.79 | % | 22.43 | % |
In addition to regulatory requirements that restrict our ability to raise capital, the Facilities, the Convertible Unsecured Notes and the Unsecured Notes contain various covenants that, if not complied with, could accelerate repayment under the Facilities, the Convertible Unsecured Notes and the Unsecured Notes, thereby materially and adversely affecting our liquidity, financial condition and results of operations.
The agreements governing the Facilities, the Convertible Unsecured Notes and the Unsecured Notes require us to comply with certain financial and operational covenants. These covenants may include, among other things:
As of the date of this prospectus, we are in compliance in all material respects with the covenants of the Facilities, the Convertible Unsecured Notes and the Unsecured Notes. However, our continued compliance with these covenants depends on many factors, some of which are beyond our control. For example, depending on the condition of the public debt and equity markets and pricing levels, unrealized depreciation in our portfolio may increase in the future. Any such increase could
27
result in our inability to comply with our obligation to restrict the level of indebtedness that we are able to incur in relation to the value of our assets or to maintain a minimum level of stockholders' equity.
Accordingly, although we believe we will continue to be in compliance, there are no assurances that we will continue to comply with the covenants in the Facilities, the Convertible Unsecured Notes and the Unsecured Notes. Failure to comply with these covenants could result in a default under the Facilities, the Convertible Unsecured Notes or the Unsecured Notes that, if we were unable to obtain a waiver from the lenders or holders of such indebtedness, as applicable, such lenders or holders could accelerate repayment under such indebtedness and thereby have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We operate in a highly competitive market for investment opportunities.
A number of entities compete with us to make the types of investments that we make in middle-market companies. We compete with other BDCs, public and private funds, commercial and investment banks, commercial financing companies, insurance companies, hedge funds, and, to the extent they provide an alternative form of financing, private equity funds. Many of our competitors are substantially larger and have considerably greater financial, technical and marketing resources than we do. Some competitors may have a lower cost of funds and access to funding sources that are not available to us. In addition, some of our competitors may have higher risk tolerances or different risk assessments, which could allow them to consider a wider variety of investments and establish more relationships than us. Furthermore, many of our competitors are not subject to the regulatory restrictions that the Investment Company Act imposes on us as a BDC and that the Code imposes on us as a RIC. We cannot assure you that the competitive pressures we face will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Also, as a result of this competition, we may not be able to pursue attractive investment opportunities from time to time.
We do not seek to compete primarily based on the interest rates we offer and we believe that some of our competitors may make loans with interest rates that are comparable to or lower than the rates we offer. Rather, we compete with our competitors based on our existing investment platform, seasoned investment professionals, experience and focus on middle-market companies, disciplined investment philosophy, extensive industry focus and flexible transaction structuring. For a more detailed discussion of these competitive advantages, see "BusinessCompetitive Advantages."
We may lose investment opportunities if we do not match our competitors' pricing, terms and structure. If we match our competitors' pricing, terms and structure, we may experience decreased net interest income and increased risk of credit loss. As a result of operating in such a competitive environment, we may make investments that are on less favorable terms than what we may have originally anticipated, which may impact our return on these investments.
We may be subject to additional corporate-level income taxes if we fail to maintain our status as a RIC.
We have elected to be treated as a RIC under the Code and operate in a manner so as to qualify for the U.S. federal income tax treatment applicable to RICs. As a RIC, we generally will not pay U.S. federal corporate-level income taxes on our income and net capital gains that we distribute to our stockholders as dividends on a timely basis. We will be subject to U.S. federal corporate-level income tax on any undistributed income and/or gains. To maintain our status as a RIC, we must meet certain source of income, asset diversification and annual distribution requirements. We may also be subject to certain U.S. federal excise taxes, as well as state, local and foreign taxes.
To satisfy the Annual Distribution Requirement (as defined below) applicable to RICs, we must distribute to our stockholders on a timely basis generally an amount equal to at least 90% of our
28
investment company taxable income for each year. We have the ability to pay a large portion of our dividends in shares of our stock, and as long as a portion of such dividend is paid in cash and other requirements are met, such stock dividends will be taxable as a dividend for U.S. federal income tax purposes. This may result in our U.S. stockholders having to pay tax on such dividends, even if no cash is received, and may result in our non-U.S. stockholders being subject to withholding tax in respect of amounts distributed in our stock. Because we use debt financing, we are subject to certain asset coverage ratio requirements under the Investment Company Act and financial covenants under our indebtedness that could, under certain circumstances, restrict us from making distributions necessary to qualify as a RIC. If we are unable to obtain cash from other sources, we may fail to maintain our status as a RIC and, thus, may be subject to corporate-level income tax on all of our income and/or gains.
To maintain our status as a RIC, in addition to the Annual Distribution Requirement, we must also meet certain annual source of income requirements at the end of each taxable year and asset diversification requirements at the end of each calendar quarter. Failure to meet these requirements may result in our having to (a) dispose of certain investments quickly or (b) raise additional capital to prevent the loss of RIC status. Because most of our investments are in private companies and are generally illiquid, any such dispositions may be at disadvantageous prices and may result in losses. Also, the rules applicable to our qualification as a RIC are complex with many areas of uncertainty. Accordingly, no assurance can be given that we have qualified or will continue to qualify as a RIC. If we fail to maintain our status as a RIC for any reason and become subject to regular "C" corporation income tax, the resulting corporate-level income taxes could substantially reduce our net assets, the amount of income available for distribution and the amount of our distributions. Such a failure would have a material adverse effect on us and on any investment in us. The "Regulated Investment Company Modernization Act of 2010," which is effective for 2011 and later tax years, provides some relief from RIC disqualification due to failures of the source of income and asset diversification requirements, although there may be additional taxes due in such cases. We cannot assure you that we would qualify for any such relief should we fail the source of income or asset diversification requirements.
We may have difficulty paying our required distributions under applicable tax rules if we recognize income before or without receiving cash representing such income.
For U.S. federal income tax purposes, we generally are required to include in income certain amounts that we have not yet received in cash, such as original issue discount, which may arise, for example, if we receive warrants in connection with the making of a loan, or payment-in-kind ("PIK") interest representing contractual interest added to the loan principal balance and due at the end of the loan term. Such original issue discount or PIK interest is included in income before we receive any corresponding cash payments. We also may be required to include in income certain other amounts that we will not receive in cash, including, for example, amounts attributable to hedging and foreign currency transactions or cancellation of indebtedness income resulting from a restructuring of an investment in debt securities.
Since, in certain cases, we may recognize income before or without receiving cash in respect of such income, we may have difficulty meeting the U.S. federal income tax requirement to distribute generally an amount equal to at least 90% of our investment company taxable income to maintain our status as a RIC. Accordingly, we may have to sell some of our investments at times we would not consider advantageous, raise additional debt or equity capital or reduce new investment originations to meet these distribution requirements. If we are not able to obtain cash from other sources, we may fail to qualify as a RIC and thus be subject to additional corporate-level income taxes. Such a failure would have a material adverse effect on us and on any investment in us. See "Certain Material U.S. Federal Income Tax ConsiderationsTaxation as a RIC."
29
We are exposed to risks associated with changes in interest rates.
General interest rate fluctuations may have a substantial negative impact on our investments and investment opportunities and, accordingly, may have a material adverse effect on our investment objective and rate of return on invested capital. Because we borrow money and may issue debt securities or preferred stock to make investments, our net investment income is dependent upon the difference between the rate at which we borrow funds or pay interest or dividends on such debt securities or preferred stock and the rate at which we invest these funds. As a result, there can be no assurance that a significant change in market interest rates will not have a material adverse effect on our net investment income.
Trading prices for debt that pays a fixed rate of return tend to fall as interest rates rise. Trading prices tend to fluctuate more for fixed-rate securities that have longer maturities. In the past, we have entered into certain hedging transactions, such as interest rate swap agreements, to mitigate our exposure to adverse fluctuations in interest rates, and we may do so again in the future. In addition, we may increase our floating rate investments to position the portfolio for rate increases. However, we cannot assure you that such transactions will be successful in mitigating our exposure to interest rate risk. Hedging transactions may also limit our ability to participate in the benefits of lower interest rates with respect to our portfolio investments.
Although we have no policy governing the maturities of our investments, under current market conditions we expect that we will invest in a portfolio of debt generally having maturities of up to 10 years. This means that we are subject to greater risk (other things being equal) than a fund invested solely in shorter-term securities. A decline in the prices of the debt we own could adversely affect the trading price of our common stock. Also, an increase in interest rates available to investors could make an investment in our common stock less attractive if we are not able to increase our dividend rate, which could reduce the value of our common stock.
Most of our portfolio investments are not publicly traded and, as a result, the fair value of these investments may not be readily determinable.
A large percentage of our portfolio investments are not publicly traded. The fair value of investments that are not publicly traded may not be readily determinable. We value these investments quarterly at fair value as determined in good faith by our board of directors based on, among other things, the input of our management and audit committee and independent valuation firms that have been engaged at the direction of our board of directors to assist in the valuation of each portfolio investment without a readily available market quotation at least once during a trailing 12-month period (with certain de minimis exceptions). The valuation process is conducted at the end of each fiscal quarter, with a minimum of 55% (based on value) of our valuations of portfolio companies without readily available market quotations subject to review by an independent valuation firm each quarter. However, we may use these independent valuation firms to review the value of our investments more frequently, including in connection with the occurrence of significant events or changes in value affecting a particular investment. In addition, our independent registered public accounting firm obtains an understanding of, and performs select procedures relating to, our investment valuation process within the context of performing the integrated audit.
The types of factors that may be considered in valuing our investments include the enterprise value of the portfolio company (the entire value of the portfolio company to a market participant, including the sum of the values of debt and equity securities used to capitalize the enterprise at a point in time), the nature and realizable value of any collateral, the portfolio company's ability to make payments and its earnings and discounted cash flows, the markets in which the portfolio company does business, a comparison of the portfolio company's securities to similar publicly traded securities, changes in the interest rate environment and the credit markets generally that may affect the price at
30
which similar investments would trade in their principal markets and other relevant factors. When an external event such as a purchase transaction, public offering or subsequent equity sale occurs, we consider the pricing indicated by the external event to corroborate our valuation. Because such valuations, and particularly valuations of private investments and private companies, are inherently uncertain, may fluctuate over short periods of time and may be based on estimates, our determinations of fair value may differ materially from the values that would have been used if a ready market for these investments existed and may differ materially from the values that we may ultimately realize. Our net asset value per share could be adversely affected if our determinations regarding the fair value of these investments are higher than the values that we realize upon disposition of such investments.
The lack of liquidity in our investments may adversely affect our business.
As we generally make investments in private companies, substantially all of these investments are subject to legal and other restrictions on resale or are otherwise less liquid than publicly traded securities. The illiquidity of our investments may make it difficult for us to sell such investments if the need arises. In addition, if we are required to liquidate all or a portion of our portfolio quickly, we could realize significantly less than the value at which we have recorded our investments. In addition, we may face other restrictions on our ability to liquidate an investment in a portfolio company to the extent that we or an affiliated manager of Ares has material non-public information regarding such portfolio company.
We may experience fluctuations in our quarterly results.
We could experience fluctuations in our quarterly operating results due to a number of factors, including the interest rates payable on the debt investments we make, the default rates on such investments, the level of our expenses, variations in and the timing of the recognition of realized and unrealized gains or losses, the degree to which we encounter competition in our markets and general economic conditions. As a result of these factors, results for any period should not be relied upon as being indicative of performance in future periods.
Our financial condition and results of operations could be negatively affected if a significant investment fails to perform as expected.
Our investment portfolio includes investments that may be significant individually or in the aggregate. If a significant investment in one or more companies fails to perform as expected, such a failure could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations, and the magnitude of such effect could be more significant than if we had further diversified our portfolio.
Our investment portfolio includes our investment in the SSLP, which as of June 30, 2015, represented approximately 25% of our total portfolio at fair value. In addition, for the six months ended June 30, 2015, approximately 34% of our total investment income was earned from our investment in the SSLP. The income earned from the SSLP is derived from the interest and fee income earned by the SSLP from its investments in first lien senior secured loans of middle-market companies. We provide capital to the SSLP in the form of subordinated certificates (the "SSLP Certificates"), which had a 13.7% yield at fair value as of June 30, 2015 and are junior in right of payment to the senior notes held by GE in the SSLP. For more information on the SSLP, see "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsPortfolio and Investment ActivitySenior Secured Loan Program." Our return on and repayment of our investment in the SSLP Certificates depends on the performance of the loans in the SSLP's portfolio in the aggregate. Accordingly, any material degradation in the performance of the loans in the SSLP's portfolio in the aggregate would have a negative effect on the yield on our SSLP Certificates and could ultimately result in the loss of some or all of our investment in the SSLP Certificates.
31
As discussed earlier in this prospectus, GE is selling its U.S. Sponsor Finance business, through which GE participates with us in the SSLP, to CPPIB. While GECC has announced its intention to continue to operate the SSLP and to provide us and CPPIB the opportunity to work together on the SSLP on a go-forward basis, it has also stated that if a mutual agreement between us and CPPIB to partner on the SSLP is not reached, it intends to retain its interest in the SSLP and the SSLP would be wound down in an orderly manner. We notified the SSLP on June 9, 2015 of our election to terminate, effective 90 days thereafter, our obligation to present senior secured lending investment opportunities to the SSLP prior to pursuing such opportunities for ourself. We do not anticipate that we will make any investments in the SSLP related to new portfolio companies. We expect that the aggregate SSLP portfolio will decline over time as loans in the program are repaid or exited, and as a result the portion of our earnings attributable to our investment in the SSLP will decline over time as well.
There are significant potential conflicts of interest that could impact our investment returns.
Certain of our executive officers and directors, and members of the investment committee of our investment adviser, serve or may serve as officers, directors or principals of other entities and affiliates of our investment adviser and investment funds managed by our affiliates. Accordingly, they may have obligations to investors in those entities, the fulfillment of which might not be in our or our stockholders' best interests or may require them to devote time to services for other entities, which could interfere with the time available to provide services to us. Certain members of our investment adviser's investment committee have significant responsibilities for other Ares funds. For example, Mr. Bennett Rosenthal is required to devote a substantial majority of his business time to the affairs of the Ares Private Equity Group. Similarly, although the professional staff of our investment adviser will devote as much time to the management of the Company as appropriate to enable our investment adviser to perform its duties in accordance with the investment advisory and management agreement, the investment professionals of our investment adviser may have conflicts in allocating their time and services among the Company, on the one hand, and investment vehicles managed by Ares or one or more of its affiliates, on the other hand. These activities could be viewed as creating a conflict of interest insofar as the time and effort of the professional staff of our investment adviser and its officers and employees will not be devoted exclusively to the business of the Company but will instead be allocated between the business of the Company and the management of these other investment vehicles. However, Ares believes that the efforts of such individuals are synergistic with and beneficial to the affairs of Ares Capital and these other investment vehicles managed by Ares or its affiliates.
In addition, certain Ares funds may have investment objectives that compete or overlap with, and may from time to time invest in asset classes similar to those targeted by, Ares Capital. Consequently, we, on the one hand, and these other entities, on the other hand, may from time to time pursue the same or similar capital and investment opportunities. Ares and our investment adviser endeavor to allocate investment opportunities in a fair and equitable manner, and in any event consistent with any fiduciary duties owed to Ares Capital. Nevertheless, it is possible that we may not be given the opportunity to participate in certain investments made by investment funds managed by investment managers affiliated with Ares. In addition, there may be conflicts in the allocation of investment opportunities among us and the funds managed by investment managers affiliated with Ares or one or more of our controlled affiliates or among the funds they manage.
We have from time to time sold assets to IHAM and certain of the vehicles managed by IHAM and, as part of our investment strategy, we may offer to sell additional assets to vehicles managed by one or more of our controlled affiliates (including IHAM) or we may purchase assets from vehicles managed by one or more of our controlled affiliates. In addition, vehicles managed by one or more of our controlled affiliates (including IHAM) may offer assets to or may purchase assets from one another. While assets may be sold or purchased at prices that are consistent with those that could be obtained from third parties in the marketplace, and although these types of transactions generally
32
require approval of one or more independent parties, there may be an inherent conflict of interest in such transactions between us and funds managed by one of our controlled affiliates.
We pay a base management fee, an income based fee and a capital gains incentive fee to our investment adviser, and reimburse our investment adviser for certain expenses it incurs. In addition, investors in our common stock will invest on a gross basis and receive distributions on a net basis after expenses, resulting in, among other things, a lower rate of return than one might achieve if distributions were made on a gross basis.
Our investment adviser's base management fee is based on a percentage of our total assets (other than cash or cash equivalents but including assets purchased with borrowed funds) and, consequently, our investment adviser may have conflicts of interest in connection with decisions that could affect our total assets, such as decisions as to whether to incur indebtedness or to make future investments.
The income based fees payable by us to our investment adviser that relate to our pre-incentive fee net investment income is computed and paid on income that may include interest that is accrued but not yet received in cash. If a portfolio company defaults on a loan that is structured to provide accrued interest, it is possible that accrued interest previously used in the calculation of such fee will become uncollectible. Our investment adviser is not under any obligation to reimburse us for any part of the income based fees it received that were based on accrued interest that we never actually receive.
Our investment advisory and management agreement renews for successive annual periods if approved by our board of directors or by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of our outstanding voting securities, including, in either case, approval by a majority of our directors who are not "interested persons" of the Company as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the Investment Company Act. However, both we and our investment adviser have the right to terminate the agreement without penalty upon 60 days' written notice to the other party. Moreover, conflicts of interest may arise if our investment adviser seeks to change the terms of our investment advisory and management agreement, including, for example, the terms for compensation. While any material change to the investment advisory and management agreement must be submitted to stockholders for approval under the Investment Company Act, we may from time to time decide it is appropriate to seek stockholder approval to change the terms of the agreement.
We are party to an administration agreement with our administrator, Ares Operations, a subsidiary of Ares Management, pursuant to which our administrator furnishes us with administrative services and we pay our administrator at cost our allocable portion of overhead and other expenses (including travel expenses) incurred by our administrator in performing its obligations under our administration agreement, including our allocable portion of the cost of certain of our officers (including our chief compliance officer, chief financial officer, chief accounting officer, general counsel, treasurer and assistant treasurer) and their respective staffs, but not investment professionals.
Our portfolio company, IHAM, is party to an administration agreement, referred to herein as the "IHAM administration agreement," with Ares Operations. Pursuant to the IHAM administration agreement, our administrator provides IHAM with administrative services and IHAM reimburses our administrator for all of the actual costs associated with such services, including its allocable portion of our administrator's overhead and the cost of our administrator's officers and respective staff in performing its obligations under the IHAM administration agreement. Prior to entering into the IHAM administration agreement, IHAM was party to a services agreement with our investment adviser, pursuant to which our investment adviser provided similar services.
As a result of the arrangements described above, there may be times when the management team of Ares (including those members of management focused primarily on managing Ares Capital) has interests that differ from those of yours, giving rise to a conflict.
33
Our stockholders may have conflicting investment, tax and other objectives with respect to their investments in us. The conflicting interests of individual stockholders may relate to or arise from, among other things, the nature of our investments, the structure or the acquisition of our investments, and the timing of dispositions of our investments. As a consequence, conflicts of interest may arise in connection with decisions made by our investment adviser, including with respect to the nature or structuring of our investments, that may be more beneficial for one stockholder than for another stockholder, especially with respect to stockholders' individual tax situations. In selecting and structuring investments appropriate for us, our investment adviser will consider the investment and tax objectives of the Company and our stockholders, as a whole, not the investment, tax or other objectives of any stockholder individually.
We are dependent on information systems and systems failures could significantly disrupt our business, which may, in turn, negatively affect our liquidity, financial condition or results of operations.
Our business is dependent on our and third parties' communications and information systems. Any failure or interruption of those systems, including as a result of the termination of an agreement with any third-party service providers, could cause delays or other problems in our activities. Our financial, accounting, data processing, backup or other operating systems and facilities may fail to operate properly or become disabled or damaged as a result of a number of factors including events that are wholly or partially beyond our control and adversely affect our business. There could be:
These events, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results and negatively affect the market price of our common stock and our ability to pay dividends to our stockholders.
Cybersecurity risks and cyber incidents may adversely affect our business by causing a disruption to our operations, a compromise or corruption of our confidential information and/or damage to our business relationships, all of which could negatively impact our business, financial condition and operating results.
A cyber incident is considered to be any adverse event that threatens the confidentiality, integrity or availability of our information resources. These incidents may be an intentional attack or an unintentional event and could involve gaining unauthorized access to our information systems for purposes of misappropriating assets, stealing confidential information, corrupting data or causing operational disruption. The result of these incidents may include disrupted operations, misstated or unreliable financial data, liability for stolen assets or information, increased cybersecurity protection and insurance costs, litigation and damage to our business relationships. As our reliance on technology has increased, so have the risks posed to our information systems, both internal and those provided by Ares Management and third-party service providers. Ares Management has implemented processes, procedures and internal controls to help mitigate cybersecurity risks and cyber intrusions, but these measures, as well as our increased awareness of the nature and extent of a risk of a cyber incident, do not guarantee that a cyber incident will not occur and/or that our financial results, operations or confidential information will not be negatively impacted by such an incident.
34
Changes in laws or regulations governing our operations or the operations of our portfolio companies or our SBIC subsidiary, changes in the interpretation thereof or newly enacted laws or regulations, such as the Dodd-Frank Act, and any failure by us or our portfolio companies to comply with these laws or regulations, could require changes to certain business practices of us or our portfolio companies, negatively impact the operations, cash flows or financial condition of us or our portfolio companies, impose additional costs on us or our portfolio companies or otherwise adversely affect our business or the business of our portfolio companies.
We and our portfolio companies are subject to regulation by laws and regulations at the local, state, federal and, in some cases, foreign levels. These laws and regulations, as well as their interpretation, may be changed from time to time, and new laws and regulations may be enacted. Accordingly, any change in these laws or regulations, changes in their interpretation, or newly enacted laws or regulations and any failure by us or our portfolio companies to comply with these laws or regulations, could require changes to certain business practices of us or our portfolio companies, negatively impact the operations, cash flows or financial condition of us or our portfolio companies, impose additional costs on us or our portfolio companies or otherwise adversely affect our business or the business of our portfolio companies.
On July 21, 2010, President Obama signed into law the Dodd-Frank Act. Many of the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act have had extended implementation periods and delayed effective dates and have required extensive rulemaking by regulatory authorities. While many of the rules required to be written have been promulgated, some have not yet been implemented. Although the full impact of the Dodd-Frank Act on us and our portfolio companies may not be known for an extended period of time, the Dodd-Frank Act, including the rules implementing its provisions and the interpretation of those rules, along with other legislative and regulatory proposals directed at the financial services industry or affecting taxation that are proposed or pending in the U.S. Congress, may negatively impact the operations, cash flows or financial condition of us or our portfolio companies, impose additional costs on us or our portfolio companies, intensify the regulatory supervision of us or our portfolio companies or otherwise adversely affect our business or the business of our portfolio companies.
Over the last several years, there also has been an increase in regulatory attention to the extension of credit outside of the traditional banking sector, raising the possibility that some portion of the non-bank financial sector will be subject to new regulation. While it cannot be known at this time whether any regulation will be implemented or what form it will take, increased regulation of non-bank credit extension could negatively impact our operating results or financial condition, impose additional costs on us, intensify the regulatory supervision of us or otherwise adversely affect our business.
Our investment adviser's liability is limited under the investment advisory and management agreement, and we are required to indemnify our investment adviser against certain liabilities, which may lead our investment adviser to act in a riskier manner on our behalf than it would when acting for its own account.
Our investment adviser has not assumed any responsibility to us other than to render the services described in the investment advisory and management agreement, and it will not be responsible for any action of our board of directors in declining to follow our investment adviser's advice or recommendations. Pursuant to the investment advisory and management agreement, our investment adviser and its members and their respective officers, managers, partners, agents, employees, controlling persons and members and any other person or entity affiliated with it will not be liable to us for their acts under the investment advisory and management agreement, absent willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard in the performance of their duties. We have agreed to indemnify, defend and protect our investment adviser and its members and their respective officers, managers, partners, agents, employees, controlling persons and members and any other person or entity affiliated
35
with it with respect to all damages, liabilities, costs and expenses resulting from acts of our investment adviser not arising out of willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard in the performance of their duties under the investment advisory and management agreement. These protections may lead our investment adviser to act in a riskier manner when acting on our behalf than it would when acting for its own account. See "Risk FactorsRisks Relating to Our InvestmentsOur investment adviser's fee structure may induce it to make certain investments, including speculative investments."
We may be obligated to pay our investment adviser certain fees even if we incur a loss.
Our investment adviser is entitled to income based fees for each fiscal quarter in an amount equal to a percentage of the excess of our pre-incentive fee net investment income for that quarter (before deducting any income based fee and capital gains incentive fees and certain other items) above a threshold return for that quarter. Our pre-incentive fee net investment income for income based fee purposes excludes realized and unrealized capital losses or depreciation and income taxes related to realized gains that we may incur in the fiscal quarter, even if such capital losses or depreciation and income taxes related to realized gains result in a net loss on our statement of operations for that quarter. Thus, we may be required to pay our investment adviser income based fees for a fiscal quarter even if there is a decline in the value of our portfolio or we incur a net loss for that quarter.
Under the investment advisory and management agreement, we will defer cash payment of any income based fee and the capital gains incentive fee otherwise earned by our investment adviser if, during the most recent four full calendar quarter periods ending on or prior to the date such payment is to be made, the sum of (a) our aggregate distributions to our stockholders and (b) our change in net assets (defined as total assets less indebtedness and before taking into account any income based fees or capital gains incentive fees accrued during the period) is less than 7.0% of our net assets (defined as total assets less indebtedness) at the beginning of such period. These calculations will be adjusted for any share issuances or repurchases. Any such deferred fees will be carried over for payment in subsequent calculation periods to the extent such payment can then be made under the investment advisory and management agreement.
If a portfolio company defaults on a loan that is structured to provide accrued interest, it is possible that accrued interest previously used in the calculation of income based fees will become uncollectible. Our investment adviser is not under any obligation to reimburse us for any part of income based fees it received that was based on accrued income that we never receive as a result of a default on the obligation that resulted in the accrual of such income.
Our SBIC subsidiary is subject to SBA regulations.
Our wholly owned subsidiary, Ares Venture Finance, L.P. ("AVF LP"), is a licensed Small Business Investment Company ("SBIC") and is regulated by the Small Business Administration ("SBA"). As of June 30, 2015, AVF LP held approximately $49.0 million in assets and accounted for approximately 0.5% of our total assets. AVF LP obtains leverage by issuing SBA-guaranteed debentures. As of June 30, 2015, AVF LP had approximately $15.0 million in aggregate principal amount of the SBA Debentures outstanding.
If AVF LP fails to comply with applicable regulations, the SBA could, depending on the severity of the violation, limit or prohibit AVF LP's use of SBA-guaranteed debentures, declare outstanding SBA-guaranteed debentures immediately due and payable, and/or limit AVF LP from making new investments. In addition, the SBA could revoke or suspend AVF LP's license for willful or repeated violation of, or willful or repeated failure to observe, any provision of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended (the "Small Business Investment Act") or any rule or regulation promulgated thereunder. AVF LP's status as an SBIC does not automatically assure that it will receive
36
SBA-guaranteed debenture funding. Receipt of SBA leverage funding is dependent upon whether AVF LP is and continues to be in compliance with SBA regulations and policies and whether funding is available. The amount of SBA leverage funding available to SBICs is dependent upon annual Congressional authorizations and in the future may be subject to annual Congressional appropriations. There can be no assurance that there will be sufficient debenture funding available at the times desired by AVF LP. For more information on SBA-guaranteed debentures or the SBA regulations to which AVF LP is subject, see "RegulationSBA Regulation."
We have elected to be treated as a RIC and operate in a manner so as to qualify for the U.S. federal income tax treatment applicable to RICs. Among other things, in order to maintain our RIC status, we must distribute to our stockholders on a timely basis generally an amount equal to at least 90% of our investment company taxable income, which includes taxable income from AVF LP. AVF LP may be limited by SBA regulations from making certain distributions to us that may be necessary to timely make distributions to stockholders and to maintain our status as a RIC. Compliance with the SBA regulations may cause us to fail to qualify as a RIC and consequently result in the imposition of additional corporate-level income taxes on us. Noncompliance with the SBA regulations may result in adverse consequences for AVF LP as described above.
RISKS RELATING TO OUR INVESTMENTS
Declines in market prices and liquidity in the corporate debt markets can result in significant net unrealized depreciation of our portfolio, which in turn would reduce our net asset value.
As a BDC, we are required to carry our investments at market value or, if no market value is ascertainable, at fair value as determined in good faith by or under the direction of our board of directors. We may take into account the following types of factors, if relevant, in determining the fair value of our investments: the enterprise value of a portfolio company (the entire value of the portfolio company to a market participant, including the sum of the values of debt and equity securities used to capitalize the enterprise at a point in time), the nature and realizable value of any collateral, the portfolio company's ability to make payments and its earnings and discounted cash flow, the markets in which the portfolio company does business, a comparison of the portfolio company's securities to similar publicly traded securities, changes in the interest rate environment and the credit markets generally that may affect the price at which similar investments would trade in their principal markets and other relevant factors. When an external event such as a purchase transaction, public offering or subsequent equity sale occurs, we use the pricing indicated by the external event to corroborate our valuation. While most of our investments are not publicly traded, applicable accounting standards require us to assume as part of our valuation process that our investments are sold in a principal market to market participants (even if we plan on holding an investment through its maturity). As a result, volatility in the capital markets can also adversely affect our investment valuations. Decreases in the market values or fair values of our investments are recorded as unrealized depreciation. The effect of all of these factors on our portfolio can reduce our net asset value by increasing net unrealized depreciation in our portfolio. Depending on market conditions, we could incur substantial realized losses and may suffer unrealized losses, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Economic recessions or downturns could impair our portfolio companies and harm our operating results.
Many of our portfolio companies may be susceptible to economic downturns or recessions and may be unable to repay our loans during these periods. Therefore, during these periods our non-performing assets may increase and the value of our portfolio may decrease if we are required to write down the values of our investments. Adverse economic conditions may also decrease the value of collateral securing some of our loans and the value of our equity investments. Economic slowdowns or
37
recessions could lead to financial losses in our portfolio and a decrease in revenues, net income and assets. Unfavorable economic conditions also could increase our funding costs, limit our access to the capital markets or result in a decision by lenders not to extend credit to us. These events could prevent us from increasing investments and harm our operating results. We experienced to some extent such effects as a result of the economic downturn that occurred from 2008 through 2009 and may experience such effects again in any future downturn or recession.
A portfolio company's failure to satisfy financial or operating covenants imposed by us or other lenders could lead to defaults and, potentially, acceleration of the time when the loans are due and foreclosure on its assets representing collateral for its obligations, which could trigger cross defaults under other agreements and jeopardize our portfolio company's ability to meet its obligations under the debt that we hold and the value of any equity securities we own. We may incur expenses to the extent necessary to seek recovery upon default or to negotiate new terms with a defaulting portfolio company.
Investments in privately held middle-market companies involve significant risks.
We primarily invest in privately held U.S. middle-market companies. Investments in privately held middle-market companies involve a number of significant risks, including the following:
Our debt investments may be risky and we could lose all or part of our investment.
The debt that we invest in is typically not initially rated by any rating agency, but we believe that if such investments were rated, they would be below investment grade (rated lower than "Baa3" by Moody's Investors Service, lower than "BBB" by Fitch Ratings or lower than "BBB" by
38
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services), which under the guidelines established by these entities, is an indication of having predominantly speculative characteristics with respect to the issuer's capacity to pay interest and repay principal. Bonds that are rated below investment grade are sometimes referred to as "high yield bonds" or "junk bonds." Therefore, our investments may result in an above average amount of risk and volatility or loss of principal. While the debt we invest in is often secured, such security does not guarantee that we will receive principal and interest payments according to the terms of the loan, or that the value of any collateral will be sufficient to allow us to recover all or a portion of the outstanding amount of the loan should we be forced to enforce our remedies.
We also may invest in assets other than first and second lien and mezzanine debt investments, including high-yield securities, U.S. government securities, credit derivatives and other structured securities and certain direct equity investments. These investments entail additional risks that could adversely affect our investment returns.
Investments in equity securities, many of which are illiquid with no readily available market, involve a substantial degree of risk.
We may purchase common and other equity securities. Although common stock has historically generated higher average total returns than fixed income securities over the long-term, common stock also has experienced significantly more volatility in those returns. The equity securities we acquire may fail to appreciate and may decline in value or become worthless and our ability to recover our investment will depend on our portfolio companies' success. Investments in equity securities involve a number of significant risks, including:
There are special risks associated with investing in preferred securities, including:
39
Additionally, when we invest in first lien senior secured loans (including unitranche loans), second lien senior secured loans or mezzanine debt, we may acquire warrants or other equity securities as well. Our goal is ultimately to dispose of such equity interests and realize gains upon our disposition of such interests. However, the equity interests we receive may not appreciate in value and, in fact, may decline in value. Accordingly, we may not be able to realize gains from our equity interests and any gains that we do realize on the disposition of any equity interests may not be sufficient to offset any other losses we experience.
We may invest, to the extent permitted by law, in the equity securities of investment funds that are operating pursuant to certain exceptions to the Investment Company Act and in advisers to similar investment funds and, to the extent we so invest, will bear our ratable share of any such company's expenses, including management and performance fees. We will also remain obligated to pay the base management fee, income based fee and capital gains incentive fee to our investment adviser with respect to the assets invested in the securities and instruments of such companies. With respect to each of these investments, each of our common stockholders will bear his or her share of the base management fee, income based fee and capital gains incentive fee due to our investment adviser as well as indirectly bearing the management and performance fees and other expenses of any such investment funds or advisers.
There may be circumstances in which our debt investments could be subordinated to claims of other creditors or we could be subject to lender liability claims.
If one of our portfolio companies were to go bankrupt, even though we may have structured our interest as senior debt, depending on the facts and circumstances, a bankruptcy court might recharacterize our debt holding as an equity investment and subordinate all or a portion of our claim to that of other creditors. In addition, lenders can be subject to lender liability claims for actions taken by them where they become too involved in the borrower's business or exercise control over the borrower. For example, we could become subject to a lender's liability claim, if, among other things, we actually render significant managerial assistance.
Our portfolio companies may incur debt or issue equity securities that rank equally with, or senior to, our investments in such companies.
Our portfolio companies may have, or may be permitted to incur, other debt, or issue other equity securities, that rank equally with, or senior to, our investments. By their terms, such instruments may provide that the holders are entitled to receive payment of dividends, interest or principal on or before the dates on which we are entitled to receive payments in respect of our investments. These debt instruments would usually prohibit the portfolio companies from paying interest on or repaying our investments in the event and during the continuance of a default under such debt. Also, in the event of insolvency, liquidation, dissolution, reorganization or bankruptcy of a portfolio company, holders of securities ranking senior to our investment in that portfolio company typically are entitled to receive payment in full before we receive any distribution in respect of our investment. After repaying such holders, the portfolio company may not have any remaining assets to use for repaying its obligation to us. In the case of securities ranking equally with our investments, we would have to share on an equal basis any distributions with other security holders in the event of an insolvency, liquidation, dissolution, reorganization or bankruptcy of the relevant portfolio company.
The rights we may have with respect to the collateral securing any junior priority loans we make to our portfolio companies may also be limited pursuant to the terms of one or more intercreditor agreements (including agreements governing "first out" and "last out" structures) that we
40
enter into with the holders of senior debt. Under such an intercreditor agreement, at any time that senior obligations are outstanding, we may forfeit certain rights with respect to the collateral to the holders of the senior obligations. These rights may include the right to commence enforcement proceedings against the collateral, the right to control the conduct of such enforcement proceedings, the right to approve amendments to collateral documents, the right to release liens on the collateral and the right to waive past defaults under collateral documents. We may not have the ability to control or direct such actions, even if as a result our rights as junior lenders are adversely affected.
When we are a debt or minority equity investor in a portfolio company, we are often not in a position to exert influence on the entity, and other equity holders and management of the company may make decisions that could decrease the value of our portfolio holdings.
When we make debt or minority equity investments, we are subject to the risk that a portfolio company may make business decisions with which we disagree and the other equity holders and management of such company may take risks or otherwise act in ways that do not serve our interests. As a result, a portfolio company may make decisions that could decrease the value of our investment.
Our portfolio companies may be highly leveraged.
Some of our portfolio companies may be highly leveraged, which may have adverse consequences to these companies and to us as an investor. These companies may be subject to restrictive financial and operating covenants and the leverage may impair these companies' ability to finance their future operations and capital needs. As a result, these companies' flexibility to respond to changing business and economic conditions and to take advantage of business opportunities may be limited. Further, a leveraged company's income and net assets will tend to increase or decrease at a greater rate than if borrowed money were not used.
Our investment adviser's fee structure may induce it to make certain investments, including speculative investments.
The fees payable by us to our investment adviser may create an incentive for our investment adviser to make investments on our behalf that are risky or more speculative than would be the case in the absence of such compensation arrangement. The way in which income based fees payable to our investment adviser are determined, which are calculated as a percentage of the return on invested capital, may encourage our investment adviser to use leverage to increase the return on our investments. Under certain circumstances, the use of leverage may increase the likelihood of default, which would disfavor the holders of our common stock and the holders of securities convertible into our common stock. In addition, our investment adviser will receive the capital gains incentive fee based, in part, upon net capital gains realized on our investments. Unlike income based fees, there is no hurdle rate applicable to the capital gains incentive fee. As a result, our investment adviser may have a tendency to invest more in investments that are likely to result in capital gains as compared to income producing securities. Such a practice could result in our investing in more speculative securities than would otherwise be the case, which could result in higher investment losses, particularly during economic downturns.
The income based fees will be computed and paid on income that has been accrued but not yet received in cash, including as a result of investments with a deferred interest feature such as debt instruments with PIK interest, preferred stock with PIK dividends and zero coupon securities. If a portfolio company defaults on a loan that is structured to provide accrued interest, it is possible that accrued interest previously used in the calculation of the income based fee will become uncollectible. Our investment adviser is not under any obligation to reimburse us for any part of the fees it received that were based on such accrued interest that we never actually received.
41
Because of the structure of the income based fees, it is possible that we may have to pay income based fees in a quarter during which we incur a loss. For example, if we receive pre-incentive fee net investment income in excess of the hurdle rate for a quarter, we will pay the applicable income based fees even if we have incurred a loss in that quarter due to realized and/or unrealized capital losses. In addition, if market interest rates rise, our investment adviser may be able to invest our funds in debt instruments that provide for a higher return, which would increase our pre-incentive fee net investment income and make it easier for our investment adviser to surpass the fixed hurdle rate and receive income based fees.
Our investments in foreign companies may involve significant risks in addition to the risks inherent in U.S. investments.
Our investment strategy contemplates potential investments in foreign companies. Investing in foreign companies may expose us to additional risks not typically associated with investing in U.S. companies. These risks include changes in exchange control regulations, political and social instability, expropriation, imposition of foreign taxes (potentially at confiscatory levels), less liquid markets, less available information than is generally the case in the United States, higher transaction costs, less government supervision of exchanges, brokers and issuers, less developed bankruptcy laws, difficulty in enforcing contractual obligations, lack of uniform accounting and auditing standards and greater price volatility.
Although most of our investments will be U.S. dollar denominated, our investments that are denominated in a foreign currency will be subject to the risk that the value of a particular currency will change in relation to one or more other currencies. Among the factors that may affect currency values are trade balances, the level of short-term interest rates, differences in relative values of similar assets in different currencies, long-term opportunities for investment and capital appreciation and political developments. We may employ hedging techniques to minimize these risks, but we cannot assure you that such strategies will be effective or without risk to us.
We may expose ourselves to risks if we engage in hedging transactions.
We have and may in the future enter into hedging transactions, which may expose us to risks associated with such transactions. We may utilize instruments such as forward contracts, currency options and interest rate swaps, caps, collars and floors to seek to hedge against fluctuations in the relative values of our portfolio positions from changes in currency exchange rates and market interest rates. Use of these hedging instruments may include counter-party credit risk.
Hedging against a decline in the values of our portfolio positions does not eliminate the possibility of fluctuations in the values of such positions or prevent losses if the values of such positions decline. However, such hedging can establish other positions designed to gain from those same developments, thereby offsetting the decline in the value of such portfolio positions. Such hedging transactions may also limit the opportunity for gain if the values of the underlying portfolio positions should increase. Moreover, it may not be possible to hedge against an exchange rate or interest rate fluctuation that is so generally anticipated that we are not able to enter into a hedging transaction at an acceptable price.
The success of our hedging transactions will depend on our ability to correctly predict movements in currencies and interest rates. Therefore, while we may enter into such transactions to seek to reduce currency exchange rate and interest rate risks, unanticipated changes in currency exchange rates or interest rates may result in poorer overall investment performance than if we had not engaged in any such hedging transactions. In addition, the degree of correlation between price movements of the instruments used in a hedging strategy and price movements in the portfolio positions being hedged may vary. Moreover, for a variety of reasons, we may not seek to (or be able
42
to) establish a perfect correlation between such hedging instruments and the portfolio holdings being hedged. Any such imperfect correlation may prevent us from achieving the intended hedge and expose us to risk of loss. In addition, it may not be possible to hedge fully or perfectly against currency fluctuations affecting the value of securities denominated in non-U.S. currencies because the value of those securities is likely to fluctuate as a result of factors not related to currency fluctuations. See also "Risk FactorsRisk Relating to Our BusinessWe are exposed to risks associated with changes in interest rates."
We may initially invest a portion of the net proceeds of offerings pursuant to this prospectus primarily in high-quality short-term investments, which will generate lower rates of return than those expected from the interest generated on first and second lien senior secured loans and mezzanine debt.
We may initially invest a portion of the net proceeds of offerings pursuant to this prospectus primarily in cash, cash equivalents, U.S. government securities and other high-quality short-term investments. These securities generally earn yields substantially lower than the income that we anticipate receiving once we are fully invested in accordance with our investment objective. As a result, we may not, for a time, be able to achieve our investment objective and/or we may need to, for a time, decrease the amount of any dividend that we may pay to our stockholders to a level that is substantially lower than the level that we expect to pay when the net proceeds of offerings are fully invested in accordance with our investment objective. If we do not realize yields in excess of our expenses, we may incur operating losses and the market price of our shares may decline.
RISKS RELATING TO OFFERINGS PURSUANT TO THIS PROSPECTUS
Our shares of common stock have traded at a discount from net asset value and may do so again in the future, which could limit our ability to raise additional equity capital.
Shares of closed-end investment companies frequently trade at a market price that is less than the net asset value that is attributable to those shares. This characteristic of closed-end investment companies is separate and distinct from the risk that our net asset value per share may decline. It is not possible to accurately predict whether any shares of our common stock will trade at, above, or below net asset value. In the recent past, the stocks of BDCs as an industry, including at times shares of our common stock, have traded below net asset value and during much of 2009 traded at near historic lows as a result of concerns over liquidity, leverage restrictions and distribution requirements. When our common stock is trading below its net asset value per share, we will generally not be able to issue additional shares of our common stock at its market price without first obtaining approval for such issuance from our stockholders and our independent directors. Pursuant to approval granted at a special meeting of stockholders held on April 29, 2015, we currently are permitted to sell or otherwise issue shares of our common stock at a price below net asset value, subject to certain limitations and determinations that must be made by our board of directors. Such stockholder approval expires on April 29, 2016.
There is a risk that investors in our common stock may not receive dividends or that our dividends may not grow over time and that investors in our debt securities may not receive all of the interest income to which they are entitled.
We intend to make distributions on a quarterly basis to our stockholders out of assets legally available for distribution. We cannot assure you that we will achieve investment results that will allow us to make a specified level of cash distributions or year-to-year increases in cash distributions. If we declare a dividend and if more stockholders opt to receive cash distributions rather than participate in our dividend reinvestment plan, we may be forced to sell some of our investments in order to make cash dividend payments.
43
In addition, due to the asset coverage test applicable to us as a BDC, we may be limited in our ability to make distributions. Certain of the Facilities may also limit our ability to declare dividends if we default under certain provisions. Further, if we invest a greater amount of assets in equity securities that do not pay current dividends, it could reduce the amount available for distribution. See "Price Range of Common Stock and Distributions."
The above-referenced restrictions on distributions may also inhibit our ability to make required interest payments to holders of our debt, which may cause a default under the terms of our debt agreements. Such a default could materially increase our cost of raising capital, as well as cause us to incur penalties under the terms of our debt agreements.
Provisions of the Maryland General Corporation Law and of our charter and bylaws could deter takeover attempts and have an adverse effect on the price of our common stock.
The Maryland General Corporation Law, our charter and our bylaws contain provisions that may discourage, delay or make more difficult a change in control of Ares Capital or the removal of our directors. We are subject to the Maryland Business Combination Act (the "Business Combination Act"), subject to any applicable requirements of the Investment Company Act. Our board of directors has adopted a resolution exempting from the Business Combination Act any business combination between us and any other person, subject to prior approval of such business combination by our board, including approval by a majority of our disinterested directors. If the resolution exempting business combinations is repealed or our board or disinterested directors do not approve a business combination, the Business Combination Act may discourage third parties from trying to acquire control of us and may increase the difficulty of consummating such an offer. Our bylaws exempt from the Maryland Control Share Acquisition Act (the "Control Share Acquisition Act") acquisitions of our stock by any person. If we amend our bylaws to repeal the exemption from the Control Share Acquisition Act, subject to any applicable requirements of the Investment Company Act, the Control Share Acquisition Act also may make it more difficult for a third party to obtain control of us and may increase the difficulty of consummating such an offer.
We have also adopted measures that may make it difficult for a third party to obtain control of us, including provisions of our charter classifying our board of directors into three classes serving staggered three-year terms, and provisions of our charter authorizing our board of directors to classify or reclassify shares of our stock into one or more classes or series, to cause the issuance of additional shares of our stock, and to amend our charter from time to time, without stockholder approval, to increase or decrease the aggregate number of shares of stock or the number of shares of stock of any class or series that we have authority to issue. These provisions, as well as other provisions of our charter and bylaws, may discourage, delay, defer, make more difficult or prevent a transaction or a change in control that might otherwise be in your best interest.
Investing in our common stock may involve an above average degree of risk.
The investments we make in accordance with our investment objective may result in a higher amount of risk than alternative investment options and volatility or loss of principal. Our investments in portfolio companies may be highly speculative and aggressive and, therefore, an investment in our securities may not be suitable for someone with lower risk tolerance.
The market price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly.
The capital and credit markets have experienced periods of extreme volatility and disruption over the past several years. The market price and liquidity of the market for shares of our common
44
stock may be significantly affected by numerous factors, some of which are beyond our control and may not be directly related to our operating performance. These factors include:
In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a company's securities, securities class action litigation has often been brought against that company. If our stock price fluctuates significantly, we may be the target of securities litigation in the future. Securities litigation could result in substantial costs and divert management's attention and resources from our business.
We may in the future determine to issue preferred stock, which could adversely affect the market value of our common stock.
The issuance of shares of preferred stock with dividend or conversion rights, liquidation preferences or other economic terms favorable to the holders of preferred stock could adversely affect the market price for our common stock by making an investment in the common stock less attractive. In addition, the dividends on any preferred stock we issue must be cumulative. Payment of dividends and repayment of the liquidation preference of preferred stock must take preference over any dividends or other payments to our common stockholders, and holders of preferred stock are not subject to any of our expenses or losses and are not entitled to participate in any income or appreciation in excess of their stated preference (other than convertible preferred stock that converts
45
into common stock). In addition, under the Investment Company Act, preferred stock constitutes a "senior security" for purposes of the 200% asset coverage test.
The net asset value per share of our common stock may be diluted if we sell shares of our common stock in one or more offerings at prices below the then current net asset value per share of our common stock or securities to subscribe for or convertible into shares of our common stock.
At a special meeting of stockholders held on April 29, 2015, subject to certain determinations required to be made by our board of directors, our stockholders approved our ability to sell or otherwise issue shares of our common stock, in an amount not exceeding 25% of our then outstanding common stock, at a price below the then current net asset value per share during a period that began on June 2, 2014 and expires on April 29, 2016.
In addition, at our 2009 annual stockholders meeting, our stockholders approved a proposal authorizing us to sell or otherwise issue warrants or securities to subscribe for or convertible into shares of our common stock subject to certain limitations (including, without limitation, that the number of shares issuable does not exceed 25% of our then outstanding common stock and that the exercise or conversion price thereof is not, at the date of issuance, less than the greater of the market value per share and the net asset value per share of our common stock). The authorization granted to sell or issue warrants or securities to subscribe for or convertible into shares of our common stock has no expiration.
Any decision to sell shares of our common stock below its then current net asset value per share or securities to subscribe for or convertible into shares of our common stock would be subject to the determination by our board of directors that such issuance is in our and our stockholders' best interests.
If we were to sell shares of our common stock below its then current net asset value per share, such sales would result in an immediate dilution to the net asset value per share of our common stock. This dilution would occur as a result of the sale of shares at a price below the then current net asset value per share of our common stock and a proportionately greater decrease in the stockholders' interest in our earnings and assets and their voting interest in us than the increase in our assets resulting from such issuance. Because the number of shares of common stock that could be so issued and the timing of any issuance is not currently known, the actual dilutive effect cannot be predicted.
In addition, if we issue warrants or securities to subscribe for or convertible into shares of our common stock, subject to certain limitations, the exercise or conversion price per share could be less than net asset value per share at the time of exercise or conversion (including through the operation of anti-dilution protections). Because we would incur expenses in connection with any issuance of such securities, such issuance could result in a dilution of the net asset value per share at the time of exercise or conversion. This dilution would include reduction in net asset value per share as a result of the proportionately greater decrease in the stockholders' interest in our earnings and assets and their voting interest than the increase in our assets resulting from such issuance.
Further, if current stockholders of the Company do not purchase any shares to maintain their percentage interest, regardless of whether such offering is above or below the then current net asset value per share, their voting power will be diluted. For additional information and hypothetical examples of these risks, see "Sales of Common Stock Below Net Asset Value" and the prospectus supplement pursuant to which such sale is made.
46
Your interest in us may be diluted if you do not fully exercise your subscription rights in any rights offering. In addition, if the subscription price is less than our net asset value per share, then you will experience an immediate dilution of the aggregate net asset value of your shares.
In the event we issue subscription rights, stockholders who do not fully exercise their subscription rights should expect that they will, at the completion of a rights offering pursuant to this prospectus, own a smaller proportional interest in us than would otherwise be the case if they fully exercised their rights. We cannot state precisely the amount of any such dilution in share ownership because we do not know at this time what proportion of the shares will be purchased as a result of such rights offering.
In addition, if the subscription price is less than the net asset value per share of our common stock, then our stockholders would experience an immediate dilution of the aggregate net asset value of their shares as a result of the offering. The amount of any decrease in net asset value is not predictable because it is not known at this time what the subscription price and net asset value per share will be on the expiration date of a rights offering or what proportion of the shares will be purchased as a result of such rights offering. Such dilution could be substantial. See "Risk FactorsRisks Relating to Offerings Pursuant to this ProspectusThe net asset value per share of our common stock may be diluted if we sell shares of our common stock in one or more offerings at prices below the then current net asset value per share of our common stock or securities to subscribe for or convertible into shares of our common stock" and "Sales of Common Stock Below Net Asset Value."
Investors in offerings of our common stock will likely incur immediate dilution upon the closing of such offering.
We generally expect the public offering price of any offering of shares of our common stock to be higher than the book value per share of our outstanding common stock (unless we offer shares pursuant to a rights offering or after obtaining prior approval for such issuance from our stockholders and our independent directors). Accordingly, investors purchasing shares of our common stock in offerings pursuant to this prospectus may pay a price per share that exceeds the tangible book value per share after such offering.
Our stockholders will experience dilution in their ownership percentage if they opt out of our dividend reinvestment plan.
All dividends declared in cash payable to stockholders that are participants in our dividend reinvestment plan are automatically reinvested in shares of our common stock. As a result, our stockholders that opt out of our dividend reinvestment plan will experience dilution in their ownership percentage of our common stock over time.
Our stockholders may experience dilution upon the conversion of the Convertible Unsecured Notes.
The February 2016 Convertible Notes (as defined below) are convertible into shares of our common stock beginning August 15, 2015 or, under certain circumstances, earlier. The June 2016 Convertible Notes (as defined below) are convertible into shares of our common stock beginning on December 15, 2015 or, under certain circumstances, earlier. The 2017 Convertible Notes (as defined below) are convertible into shares of our common stock beginning on September 15, 2016 or, under certain circumstances, earlier. The 2018 Convertible Notes (as defined below) are convertible into shares of our common stock beginning on July 15, 2017 or, under certain circumstances, earlier. The 2019 Convertible Notes (as defined below) are convertible into shares of our common stock beginning on July 15, 2018 or, under certain circumstances, earlier. Upon conversion of the Convertible Unsecured Notes, we have the choice to pay or deliver, as the case may be, at our election, cash, shares of our common stock or a combination of cash and shares of our common stock. As of June 30,
47
2015, the conversion price of the February 2016 Convertible Notes was effectively $18.40 per share of common stock, the conversion price of the June 2016 Convertible Notes was effectively $18.31 per share, the conversion price of the 2017 Convertible Notes was effectively $18.93 per share, the conversion price of the 2018 Convertible Notes was effectively $19.64 per share and the conversion price of the 2019 Convertible Notes was effectively $19.99 per share, in each case taking into account certain de minimis adjustments that will be made on the conversion date and subject to further adjustment in certain circumstances. If we elect to deliver shares of common stock upon a conversion at the time our tangible book value per share exceeds the conversion price in effect at such time, our stockholders may incur dilution. In addition, our stockholders will experience dilution in their ownership percentage of common stock upon our issuance of common stock in connection with the conversion of the Convertible Unsecured Notes and any dividends paid on our common stock will also be paid on shares issued in connection with such conversion after such issuance.
Our stockholders may receive shares of our common stock as dividends, which could result in adverse tax consequences to them.
In order to satisfy the Annual Distribution Requirement applicable to RICs, we have the ability to declare a large portion of a dividend in shares of our common stock instead of in cash. As long as a portion of such dividend is paid in cash (which portion could be as low as 20%) and certain requirements are met, the entire distribution would be treated as a dividend for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As a result, a stockholder would be taxed on 100% of the fair market value of the shares received as part of the dividend on the date a stockholder received it in the same manner as a cash dividend, even though most of the dividend was paid in shares of our common stock.
Sales of substantial amounts of our common stock in the public market may have an adverse effect on the market price of our common stock.
Sales of substantial amounts of our common stock, or the availability of such common stock for sale (including as a result of the conversion of our Convertible Unsecured Notes into common stock), could adversely affect the prevailing market prices for our common stock. If this occurs and continues, it could impair our ability to raise additional capital through the sale of securities should we desire to do so.
The trading market or market value of our publicly issued debt securities may fluctuate.
Our publicly issued debt securities may or may not have an established trading market. We cannot assure you that a trading market for our publicly issued debt securities will ever develop or be maintained if developed. In addition to our creditworthiness, many factors may materially adversely affect the trading market for, and market value of, our publicly issued debt securities. These factors include, but are not limited to, the following:
48
You should also be aware that there may be a limited number of buyers if and when you decide to sell your debt securities. This too may materially adversely affect the market value of the debt securities or the trading market for the debt securities.
Terms relating to redemption may materially adversely affect your return on any debt securities that we may issue.
If your debt securities are redeemable at our option, we may choose to redeem your debt securities at times when prevailing interest rates are lower than the interest rate paid on your debt securities. In addition, if your debt securities are subject to mandatory redemption, we may be required to redeem your debt securities also at times when prevailing interest rates are lower than the interest rate paid on your debt securities. In this circumstance, you may not be able to reinvest the redemption proceeds in a comparable security at an effective interest rate as high as your debt securities being redeemed.
Our credit ratings may not reflect all risks of an investment in our debt securities.
Our credit ratings are an assessment by third parties of our ability to pay our obligations. Consequently, real or anticipated changes in our credit ratings will generally affect the market value of our debt securities. Our credit ratings, however, may not reflect the potential impact of risks related to market conditions generally or other factors discussed above on the market value of or trading market for the publicly issued debt securities.
49
Some of the statements in this prospectus constitute forward-looking statements, which relate to future events or our future performance or financial condition. The forward-looking statements contained in this prospectus involve a number of risks and uncertainties, including statements concerning:
We use words such as "anticipates," "believes," "expects," "intends," "will," "should," "may" and similar expressions to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements include these words. Our actual results and condition could differ materially from those implied or expressed in the forward-looking statements for any reason, including the factors set forth in "Risk Factors" and the other information included in this prospectus.
We have based the forward-looking statements included in this prospectus on information available to us on the date of this prospectus, and we assume no obligation to update any such forward-looking statements. Although we undertake no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, you are advised
50
to consult any additional disclosures that we may make directly to you or through reports that we have filed or in the future may file with the SEC, including annual reports on Form 10-K, registration statements on Form N-2, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K.
The forward-looking statements in this prospectus are excluded from the safe harbor protection provided by Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act") and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act").
51
Unless otherwise specified in a prospectus supplement, we intend to use the net proceeds from the sale of our securities for general corporate purposes, which include investing in portfolio companies in accordance with our investment objective. We also expect to use the net proceeds of an offering to repay or repurchase outstanding indebtedness, which may include indebtedness (approximately $3.7 billion aggregate principal amount outstanding as of July 29, 2015) under (a) the Revolving Credit Facility (as defined below) (no amounts outstanding as of July 29, 2015), (b) the Revolving Funding Facility (as defined below) (approximately $108.0 million outstanding as of July 29, 2015), (c) the SMBC Funding Facility (as defined below) (approximately $65.0 million outstanding as of July 29, 2015), (d) the February 2016 Convertible Notes (approximately $575.0 million aggregate principal amount outstanding as of July 29, 2015), (e) the June 2016 Convertible Notes (approximately $230.0 million aggregate principal amount outstanding as of July 29, 2015), (f) the 2017 Convertible Notes (approximately $162.5 million aggregate principal amount outstanding as of July 29, 2015), (g) the 2018 Convertible Notes (approximately $270.0 million aggregate principal amount outstanding as of July 29, 2015), (h) the 2019 Convertible Notes (approximately $300.0 million aggregate principal amount outstanding as of July 29, 2015), (i) the 2018 Notes (as defined below) (approximately $750.0 million aggregate principal amount outstanding as of July 29, 2015), (j) the 2020 Notes (as defined below) (approximately $600.0 million aggregate principal amount outstanding as of July 29, 2015), (k) the October 2022 Notes (as defined below) (approximately $182.5 million aggregate principal amount outstanding as of July 29, 2015), (l) the 2040 Notes (as defined below) (approximately $200.0 million aggregate principal amount outstanding as of July 29, 2015) and (m) the 2047 Notes (as defined below) (approximately $229.6 million aggregate principal amount outstanding as of July 29, 2015).
The interest charged on the indebtedness incurred under the Revolving Credit Facility is based on LIBOR (one-, two-, three- or six-month) plus an applicable spread of either 1.75% or 2.00% or an "alternate base rate" (as defined in the agreements governing the Revolving Credit Facility) plus an applicable spread of either 0.75% or 1.00%, in each case, determined monthly based on the total amount of the borrowing base relative to the total commitments of the Revolving Credit Facility and other debt, if any, secured by the same collateral as the Revolving Credit Facility. As of July 29, 2015, one-, two-, three- and six-month LIBOR was 0.19%, 0.24%, 0.30% and 0.47%, respectively. The Revolving Credit Facility is scheduled to expire on May 4, 2020. The interest charged on the indebtedness incurred under the Revolving Funding Facility is based on LIBOR plus applicable spreads ranging from 2.25% to 2.50% and ranging from 1.25% to 1.50% over "base rate" (as defined in the agreements governing the Revolving Funding Facility), in each case, determined monthly based on the composition of the borrowing base relative to outstanding borrowings under the facility. The Revolving Funding Facility is scheduled to expire on May 14, 2019 (subject to extension exercisable upon mutual consent). The interest rate charged on the indebtedness incurred under the SMBC Funding Facility is based on an applicable spread of either 1.75% or 2.00% over LIBOR or 0.75% or 1.00% over a "base rate" (as defined in the agreements governing the SMBC Funding Facility), in each case, determined monthly based on the amount of the average borrowings outstanding under the SMBC Funding Facility. The SMBC Funding Facility is scheduled to expire on September 14, 2022 (subject to two one-year extension options exercisable upon mutual consent). The interest charged on the Convertible Unsecured Notes and the Unsecured Notes is as follows: (a) 5.75% in the case of the February 2016 Convertible Notes, (b) 5.125% in the case of the June 2016 Convertible Notes, (c) 4.875% in the case of the 2017 Convertible Notes, (d) 4.75% in the case of the 2018 Convertible Notes, (e) 4.375% in the case of the 2019 Convertible Notes, (f) 4.875% in the case of the 2018 Notes, (g) 3.875% in the case of the 2020 Notes, (h) 5.875% in the case of the October 2022 Notes, (i) 7.75% in the case of the 2040 Notes, and (j) 6.875% in the case of the 2047 Notes. The February 2016 Convertible Notes, the June 2016 Convertible Notes, the 2017 Convertible Notes, the 2018 Convertible Notes and the 2019 Convertible Notes mature on February 1, 2016, June 1, 2016, March 15, 2017, January 15, 2018 and
52
January 15, 2019, respectively. The 2018 Notes, the 2020 Notes, the October 2022 Notes, the 2040 Notes and the 2047 Notes mature on November 30, 2018, January 15, 2020, October 1, 2022, October 15, 2040 and April 15, 2047, respectively. The supplement to this prospectus relating to an offering may more fully identify the use of the proceeds from such offering.
We anticipate that substantially all of the net proceeds of an offering of securities pursuant to this prospectus and its related prospectus supplement will be used for the above purposes within three months of any such offering, depending on the availability of appropriate investment opportunities consistent with our investment objective, but no longer than within six months of any such offerings.
While our primary focus is to generate current income and capital appreciation through investments in first and second lien senior secured loans and mezzanine debt and, to a lesser extent, equity securities of eligible portfolio companies, we also may invest up to 30% of our portfolio in non-qualifying assets, as permitted by the Investment Company Act. See "Regulation." Specifically, as part of this 30% basket, we may invest in entities that are not considered "eligible portfolio companies" (as defined in the Investment Company Act), including companies located outside of the United States, entities that are operating pursuant to certain exceptions under the Investment Company Act, and publicly traded entities whose public equity market capitalization exceeds the levels provided for under the Investment Company Act. Pending such investments, we will invest a portion of the net proceeds primarily in cash, cash equivalents, U.S. government securities and other high-quality short-term investments. These securities generally earn yields substantially lower than the income that we anticipate receiving once we are fully invested in accordance with our investment objective. As a result, we may not, for a time, be able to achieve our investment objective and/or we may need to, for a time, decrease the amount of any dividend that we may pay to our stockholders to a level that is substantially lower than the level that we expect to pay when the net proceeds of offerings are fully invested in accordance with our investment objective. If we do not realize yields in excess of our expenses, we may incur operating losses and the market price of our common stock and debt securities may decline. See "RegulationTemporary Investments" for additional information about temporary investments we may make while waiting to make longer-term investments in pursuit of our investment objective.
53
PRICE RANGE OF COMMON STOCK AND DISTRIBUTIONS
Our common stock is traded on The NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol "ARCC." Our common stock has historically traded at prices both above and below our net asset value per share. It is not possible to accurately predict whether our common stock will trade at, above or below net asset value. See "Risk FactorsRisks Relating to Offerings Pursuant to this ProspectusOur shares of common stock have traded at a discount from net asset value and may do so again in the future, which could limit our ability to raise additional equity capital."
The following table sets forth the net asset value per share of our common stock, the range of high and low closing sales prices of our common stock as reported on The NASDAQ Global Select Market, the closing sales price as a premium (discount) to net asset value as reported on The NASDAQ Global Select Market and the dividends paid by us in each fiscal quarter for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013. On August 14, 2015, the last reported closing sales price of our common stock on The NASDAQ Global Select Market was $16.09 per share, which represented a discount of approximately 4.2% to the net asset value per share reported by us as of June 30, 2015.
|
|
|
|
High Sales Price Premium (Discount) to Net Asset Value(2) |
Low Sales Price Premium (Discount) to Net Asset Value(2) |
|
|||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Price Range | Cash Dividend Per Share(3) |
||||||||||||||||
|
Net Asset Value(1) |
||||||||||||||||||
|
High | Low | |||||||||||||||||
Year ended December 31, 2013 |
|||||||||||||||||||
First Quarter |
$ | 15.98 | $ | 18.54 | $ | 17.66 | 16.0 | % | 10.5 | % | $ | 0.38 | |||||||
Second Quarter |
$ | 16.21 | $ | 18.27 | $ | 16.42 | 12.7 | % | 1.3 | % | $ | 0.38 | |||||||
Third Quarter |
$ | 16.35 | $ | 18.12 | $ | 17.03 | 10.8 | % | 4.2 | % | $ | 0.38 | |||||||
Fourth Quarter |
$ | 16.46 | $ | 18.38 | $ | 17.06 | 11.7 | % | 3.6 | % | $ | 0.43 | (4) | ||||||
Year ended December 31, 2014 |
|||||||||||||||||||
First Quarter |
$ | 16.42 | $ | 18.51 | $ | 17.36 | 12.7 | % | 5.7 | % | $ | 0.43 | (4) | ||||||
Second Quarter |
$ | 16.52 | $ | 17.86 | $ | 16.50 | 8.1 | % | (0.1 | )% | $ | 0.38 | |||||||
Third Quarter |
$ | 16.71 | $ | 17.80 | $ | 16.12 | 6.5 | % | (3.5 | )% | $ | 0.38 | |||||||
Fourth Quarter |
$ | 16.82 | $ | 16.45 | $ | 14.66 | (2.2 | )% | (12.8 | )% | $ | 0.38 | |||||||
Year ended December 31, 2015 |
|||||||||||||||||||
First Quarter |
$ | 16.71 | $ | 17.60 | $ | 15.55 | 5.3 | % | (6.9 | )% | $ | 0.43 | (4) | ||||||
Second Quarter |
$ | 16.80 | $ | 17.30 | $ | 16.01 | 3.0 | % | (4.7 | )% | $ | 0.38 | |||||||
Third Quarter (through August 14, 2015) |
* | $ | 16.58 | $ | 15.72 | * | * | $ | 0.38 |
We currently intend to distribute dividends or make distributions to our stockholders on a quarterly basis out of assets legally available for distribution. We may also distribute additional dividends or make additional distributions to our stockholders from time to time. Our quarterly and additional dividends or distributions, if any, will be determined by our board of directors.
54
The following table summarizes our dividends declared and payable for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2013, 2014 and 2015:
Date Declared
|
Record Date | Payment Date | Amount | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
February 27, 2013 |
March 15, 2013 | March 29, 2013 | $ | 0.38 | ||||
May 7, 2013 |
June 14, 2013 | June 28, 2013 | $ | 0.38 | ||||
August 6, 2013 |
September 16, 2013 | September 30, 2013 | $ | 0.38 | ||||
November 5, 2013 |
December 16, 2013 | December 31, 2013 | $ | 0.38 | ||||
November 5, 2013 |
December 16, 2013 | December 31, 2013 | $ | 0.05 | (1) | |||
| | | | | | | | |
Total declared and payable for 2013 |
$ | 1.57 | ||||||
| | | | | | | | |
November 5, 2013 |
March 14, 2014 | March 28, 2014 | $ | 0.05 | (1) | |||
February 26, 2014 |
March 14, 2014 | March 31, 2014 | $ | 0.38 | ||||
May 6, 2014 |
June 16, 2014 | June 30, 2014 | $ | 0.38 | ||||
August 5, 2014 |
September 15, 2014 | September 30, 2014 | $ | 0.38 | ||||
November 4, 2014 |
December 15, 2014 | December 31, 2014 | $ | 0.38 | ||||
| | | | | | | | |
Total declared and payable for 2014 |
$ | 1.57 | ||||||
| | | | | | | | |
February 26, 2015 |
March 13, 2015 | March 31, 2015 | $ | 0.38 | ||||
February 26, 2015 |
March 13, 2015 | March 31, 2015 | $ | 0.05 | (1) | |||
May 4, 2015 |
June 15, 2015 | June 30, 2015 | $ | 0.38 | ||||
August 4, 2015 |
September 15, 2015 | September 30, 2015 | $ | 0.38 | ||||
| | | | | | | | |
Total declared and payable for 2015 |
$ | 1.19 | ||||||
| | | | | | | | |
Of the $1.57 per share in dividends declared and payable for the year ended December 31, 2014, the entire $1.57 per share was comprised of ordinary income. Of the $1.57 per share in dividends declared and payable for the year ended December 31, 2013, the entire $1.57 per share was comprised of ordinary income.
To maintain our RIC status under the Code, we must timely distribute an amount equal to at least 90% of our investment company taxable income (as defined by the Code, which generally includes net ordinary income and net short term capital gains) to our stockholders. In addition, we generally will be required to pay an excise tax equal to 4% on certain undistributed taxable income unless we distribute in a timely manner an amount at least equal to the sum of (i) 98% of our ordinary income recognized during a calendar year, (ii) 98.2% of our capital gain net income, as defined by the Code, recognized for the one year period ending October 31st in that calendar year and (iii) any income recognized, but not distributed, in preceding years. The taxable income on which we pay excise tax is generally distributed to our stockholders in the next tax year. Depending on the level of taxable income earned in a tax year, we may choose to carry forward such taxable income for distribution in the following year, and pay any applicable excise tax. For the six months ended June 30, 2015, we recorded an excise tax expense of $4.0 million. For the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, we recorded a net excise tax expense of $5.5 million and $10.3 million, respectively. We cannot assure you that we will achieve results that will permit the payment of any cash distributions. We maintain an "opt out" dividend reinvestment plan for our common stockholders. As a result, if we declare a cash dividend, stockholders' cash dividends will be automatically reinvested in additional shares of our common stock, unless they specifically "opt out" of the dividend reinvestment plan so as to receive cash dividends. See "Dividend Reinvestment Plan."
55
RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
For the six months ended June 30, 2015 and years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, 2012, 2011 and 2010, the ratios of earnings to fixed charges of the Company, computed as set forth below, were as follows:
|
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 |
For the Year Ended December 31, 2014 |
For the Year Ended December 31, 2013 |
For the Year Ended December 31, 2012 |
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
For the Year Ended December 31, 2010 |
|||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Earnings to Fixed Charges(1) |
3.2 | (2) | 3.8 | (3) | 3.9 | 4.6 | (4) | 3.7 | (5) | 9.8 | (6) |
For purposes of computing the ratios of earnings to fixed charges, earnings represent net increase in stockholders' equity resulting from operations plus (or minus) income tax expense (benefit) including excise tax expense plus fixed charges. Fixed charges include interest and credit facility fees expense and amortization of debt issuance costs.
56
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The information contained in this section should be read in conjunction with the "Selected Condensed Consolidated Financial Data of Ares Capital" and our financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this prospectus or the accompanying prospectus supplement.
OVERVIEW
We are a specialty finance company that is a closed-end, non-diversified management investment company incorporated in Maryland. We have elected to be regulated as a BDC under the Investment Company Act.
We are externally managed by Ares Capital Management, a subsidiary of Ares Management, a publicly traded, leading global alternative asset manager, pursuant to our investment advisory and management agreement. Ares Operations, a subsidiary of Ares Management, provides certain administrative and other services necessary for us to operate.
Our investment objective is to generate both current income and capital appreciation through debt and equity investments. We invest primarily in first lien senior secured loans (including unitranche loans), second lien senior secured loans and mezzanine debt, which in some cases includes an equity component like warrants.
To a lesser extent, we also make preferred and/or common equity investments, which have generally been non-control equity investments, of less than $20 million (usually in conjunction with a concurrent debt investment). However, we may increase the size or change the nature of these investments.
Since our initial public offering on October 8, 2004 through June 30, 2015, our exited investments resulted in an aggregate cash flow realized internal rate of return to us of approximately 13% (based on original cash invested, net of syndications, of approximately $11.1 billion and total proceeds from such exited investments of approximately $13.6 billion). Internal rate of return is the discount rate that makes the net present value of all cash flows related to a particular investment equal to zero. Internal rate of return is gross of expenses related to investments as these expenses are not allocable to specific investments. Investments are considered to be exited when the original investment objective has been achieved through the receipt of cash and/or non-cash consideration upon the repayment of a debt investment or sale of an investment or through the determination that no further consideration was collectible and, thus, a loss may have been realized. Approximately 70% of these exited investments resulted in an aggregate cash flow realized internal rate of return to us of 10% or greater.
Additionally, since our initial public offering on October 8, 2004 through June 30, 2015, our realized gains have exceeded our realized losses by approximately $408 million (excluding a one-time gain on the acquisition of Allied Capital and realized gains/losses from the extinguishment of debt and other assets). For this same time period, our average annualized net realized gain rate was approximately 1.1% (excluding a one-time gain on the acquisition of Allied Capital and realized gains/losses from the extinguishment of debt and other assets). Net realized gain/loss rates for a particular period are the amount of net realized gains/losses during such period divided by the average quarterly investments at amortized cost in such period.
Information included herein regarding internal rates of return, realized gains and losses and annualized net realized gain rates are historical results relating to our past performance and are not necessarily indicative of future results, the achievement of which cannot be assured.
57
As a BDC, we are required to comply with certain regulatory requirements. For instance, we generally have to invest at least 70% of our total assets in "qualifying assets," including securities and indebtedness of private U.S. companies and certain public U.S. companies, cash, cash equivalents, U.S. government securities and high-quality debt investments that mature in one year or less. We also may invest up to 30% of our portfolio in non-qualifying assets, as permitted by the Investment Company Act. See "Regulation." Specifically, as part of this 30% basket, we may invest in entities that are not considered "eligible portfolio companies" (as defined in the Investment Company Act), including companies located outside of the United States, entities that are operating pursuant to certain exceptions under the Investment Company Act, and publicly traded entities whose public equity market capitalization exceeds the levels provided for under the Investment Company Act.
We have elected to be treated as a RIC, under the Code, and operate in a manner so as to qualify for the tax treatment applicable to RICs. To qualify as a RIC, we must, among other things, meet certain source-of-income and asset diversification requirements and timely distribute to our stockholders generally at least 90% of our investment company taxable income, as defined by the Code, for each year. Pursuant to this election, we generally will not have to pay corporate-level income taxes on any income that we distribute to our stockholders provided that we satisfy those requirements.
58
PORTFOLIO AND INVESTMENT ACTIVITY
Our investment activity for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 and the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 is presented below (information presented herein is at amortized cost unless otherwise indicated).
|
For the Six Months Ended June 30, |
For the Years Ended December 31, |
||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(dollar amounts in millions)
|
2015 | 2014 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | |||||||||||
New investment commitments(1): |
||||||||||||||||
New portfolio companies |
$ | 593.5 | $ | 954.4 | $ | 2,283.8 | $ | 2,148.5 | $ | 1,794.7 | ||||||
Existing portfolio companies(2) |
727.0 | 916.6 | 2,294.8 | 1,854.4 | 1,402.3 | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total new investment commitments(3) |
1,320.5 | 1,871.0 | 4,578.6 | 4,002.9 | 3,197.0 | |||||||||||
Less: |
||||||||||||||||
Investment commitments exited(4) |
1,906.4 | 1,616.5 | 3,539.8 | 1,840.0 | 2,614.5 | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment commitments |
$ | (585.9 | ) | $ | 254.5 | $ | 1,038.8 | $ | 2,162.9 | $ | 582.5 | |||||
Principal amount of investments funded: |
||||||||||||||||
First lien senior secured loans |
$ | 449.9 | $ | 1,082.0 | $ | 2,642.1 | $ | 2,011.1 | $ | 1,953.3 | ||||||
Second lien senior secured loans |
614.1 | 302.2 | 1,046.9 | 602.8 | 733.1 | |||||||||||
Subordinated certificates of the SSLP(5) |
217.7 | 262.0 | 463.6 | 652.5 | 270.0 | |||||||||||
Senior subordinated debt |
90.3 | 64.4 | 298.8 | 181.0 | 101.3 | |||||||||||
Preferred equity securities |
13.9 | 7.7 | 13.7 | 1.8 | | |||||||||||
Other equity securities |
9.5 | 14.4 | 69.2 | 44.0 | 103.9 | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total |
$ | 1,395.4 | $ | 1,732.7 | $ | 4,534.3 | $ | 3,493.2 | $ | 3,161.6 | ||||||
Principal amount of investments sold or repaid: |
||||||||||||||||
First lien senior secured loans |
$ | 1,408.4 | $ | 924.1 | $ | 2,326.0 | $ | 885.8 | $ | 1,455.9 | ||||||
Second lien senior secured loans |
154.0 | 341.1 | 444.3 | 526.1 | 331.0 | |||||||||||
Subordinated certificates of the SSLP |
162.8 | 69.2 | 174.3 | 145.2 | 66.3 | |||||||||||
Senior subordinated debt |
80.9 | 46.7 | 143.5 | 201.0 | 409.0 | |||||||||||
Preferred equity securities |
8.6 | 2.7 | 31.2 | 26.3 | 26.2 | |||||||||||
Other equity securities |
15.5 | 13.8 | 88.7 | 16.8 | 126.0 | |||||||||||
Commercial real estate |
0.4 | | 4.8 | 0.2 | 13.0 | |||||||||||
Collateralized loan obligations |
| | | | 55.5 | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total |
$ | 1,830.6 | $ | 1,397.6 | $ | 3,212.8 | $ | 1,801.4 | $ | 2,482.9 | ||||||
Number of new investment commitments(6) |
39 | 53 | 115 | 95 | 82 | |||||||||||
Average new investment commitment amount |
$ | 33.9 | $ | 35.3 | $ | 39.8 | $ | 42.1 | $ | 39.0 | ||||||
Weighted average term for new investment commitments (in months) |
75 | 70 | 73 | 74 | 66 | |||||||||||
Percentage of new investment commitments at floating rates |
91 | % | 94 | % | 90 | % | 89 | % | 88 | % | ||||||
Percentage of new investment commitments at fixed rates |
8 | % | 4 | % | 8 | % | 10 | % | 8 | % | ||||||
Weighted average yield of debt and other income producing securities(7): |
||||||||||||||||
Funded during the period at amortized cost |
9.8 | % | 9.3 | % | 9.0 | % | 9.8 | % | 9.9 | % | ||||||
Funded during the period at fair value(8) |
9.8 | % | 9.2 | % | 9.0 | % | 9.8 | % | 9.9 | % | ||||||
Exited or repaid during the period at amortized cost |
7.9 | % | 8.6 | % | 8.3 | % | 9.8 | % | 9.7 | % | ||||||
Exited or repaid during the period at fair value(8) |
7.9 | % | 8.5 | % | 8.3 | % | 9.7 | % | 9.6 | % |
59
As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, our investments consisted of the following:
|
As of | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
June 30, 2015 | December 31, 2014 | |||||||||||
(in millions)
|
Amortized Cost |
Fair Value |
Amortized Cost |
Fair Value |
|||||||||
First lien senior secured loans |
$ | 2,773.2 | $ | 2,736.5 | $ | 3,728.9 | $ | 3,700.6 | |||||
Second lien senior secured loans |
2,371.4 | 2,330.6 | 1,938.9 | 1,900.5 | |||||||||
Subordinated certificates of the SSLP(1) |
2,089.3 | 2,099.8 | 2,034.5 | 2,065.0 | |||||||||
Senior subordinated debt |
541.2 | 538.6 | 524.1 | 523.3 | |||||||||
Preferred equity securities |
241.0 | 212.0 | 206.5 | 190.2 | |||||||||
Other equity securities |
435.1 | 651.1 | 440.1 | 642.8 | |||||||||
Commercial real estate |
1.7 | 4.8 | 2.1 | 6.0 | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total |
$ | 8,452.9 | $ | 8,573.4 | $ | 8,875.1 | $ | 9,028.4 | |||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
60
The weighted average yields at amortized cost and fair value of the following portions of our portfolio as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 were as follows:
|
As of | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
June 30, 2015 | December 31, 2014 | |||||||||||
|
Amortized Cost |
Fair Value |
Amortized Cost |
Fair Value |
|||||||||
Debt and other income producing securities(1) |
10.6 | % | 10.6 | % | 10.1 | % | 10.1 | % | |||||
Total portfolio(2) |
9.7 | % | 9.6 | % | 9.3 | % | 9.1 | % | |||||
First lien senior secured loans(2) |
8.6 | % | 8.8 | % | 8.1 | % | 8.2 | % | |||||
Second lien senior secured loans(2) |
9.3 | % | 9.5 | % | 8.7 | % | 8.8 | % | |||||
Subordinated certificates of the SSLP(2)(3) |
13.8 | % | 13.7 | % | 13.8 | % | 13.5 | % | |||||
Senior subordinated debt(2) |
10.9 | % | 11.0 | % | 11.2 | % | 11.2 | % | |||||
Income producing equity securities(2) |
9.5 | % | 9.8 | % | 9.4 | % | 9.4 | % |
Ares Capital Management, our investment adviser, employs an investment rating system to categorize our investments. In addition to various risk management and monitoring tools, our investment adviser grades the credit risk of all investments on a scale of 1 to 4 no less frequently than quarterly. This system is intended primarily to reflect the underlying risk of a portfolio investment relative to our initial cost basis in respect of such portfolio investment (i.e., at the time of origination or acquisition), although it may also take into account under certain circumstances the performance of the portfolio company's business, the collateral coverage of the investment and other relevant factors. Under this system, investments with a grade of 4 involve the least amount of risk to our initial cost basis. The trends and risk factors for this investment since origination or acquisition are generally favorable, which may include the performance of the portfolio company or a potential exit. Investments graded 3 involve a level of risk to our initial cost basis that is similar to the risk to our initial cost basis at the time of origination or acquisition. This portfolio company is generally performing as expected and the risk factors to our ability to ultimately recoup the cost of our investment are neutral to favorable. All investments or acquired investments in new portfolio companies are initially assessed a grade of 3. Investments graded 2 indicate that the risk to our ability to recoup the initial cost basis of
61
such investment has increased materially since origination or acquisition, including as a result of factors such as declining performance and non-compliance with debt covenants; however, payments are generally not more than 120 days past due. An investment grade of 1 indicates that the risk to our ability to recoup the initial cost basis of such investment has substantially increased since origination or acquisition, and the portfolio company likely has materially declining performance. For debt investments with an investment grade of 1, most or all of the debt covenants are out of compliance and payments are substantially delinquent. For investments graded 1, it is anticipated that we will not recoup our initial cost basis and may realize a substantial loss of our initial cost basis upon exit. For investments graded 1 or 2, our investment adviser enhances its level of scrutiny over the monitoring of such portfolio company. The grade of a portfolio investment may be reduced or increased over time.
Set forth below is the grade distribution of our portfolio companies as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014:
|
As of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
June 30, 2015 | December 31, 2014 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollar amounts in millions)
|
Fair Value |
% | Number of Companies |
% | Fair Value |
% | Number of Companies |
% | |||||||||||||||||
Grade 1 |
$ | 2.0 | | % | 5 | 2.4 | % | $ | 49.9 | 0.6 | % | 5 | 2.4 | % | |||||||||||
Grade 2 |
363.9 | 4.2 | % | 14 | 6.8 | % | 298.5 | 3.3 | % | 11 | 5.4 | % | |||||||||||||
Grade 3 |
7,404.9 | 86.4 | % | 170 | 82.1 | % | 7,847.6 | 86.9 | % | 171 | 83.4 | % | |||||||||||||
Grade 4 |
802.6 | 9.4 | % | 18 | 8.7 | % | 832.4 | 9.2 | % | 18 | 8.8 | % | |||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total |
$ | 8,573.4 | 100.0 | % | 207 | 100.0 | % | $ | 9,028.4 | 100.0 | % | 205 | 100.0 | % | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the weighted average grade of the investments in our portfolio at fair value was 3.1 and 3.0, respectively.
As of June 30, 2015, loans on non-accrual status represented 1.7% and 1.3% of the total investments at amortized cost and at fair value, respectively. As of December 31, 2014, loans on non-accrual status represented 2.2% and 1.7% of the total investments at amortized cost and at fair value, respectively.
Senior Secured Loan Program
We co-invest in first lien senior secured loans of middle market companies with GE through an unconsolidated Delaware limited liability company, the Senior Secured Loan Fund LLC (d/b/a "the Senior Secured Loan Program") or the SSLP. The SSLP is capitalized as transactions are completed and all portfolio decisions and generally all other decisions in respect of the SSLP must be approved by an investment committee of the SSLP consisting of representatives of ours and GE (with approval from a representative of each required). We provide capital to the SSLP in the form of the SSLP Certificates.
In April 2015, GE announced its intention to sell most of the assets of GECC and to exit certain commercial lending businesses. This sale includes the U.S. Sponsor Finance business, through which GE participates with us in the SSLP. On June 9, 2015, GE announced that it reached an agreement to sell its U.S. Sponsor Finance business to CPPIB. GECC has announced its intention to continue to operate the SSLP and to provide us and CPPIB the opportunity to work together on the SSLP on a go-forward basis. GECC has stated that if a mutual agreement between us and CPPIB to partner on the SSLP is not reached, it intends to retain its interest in the SSLP and the SSLP would be wound down in an orderly manner. Given GECC's proposed exit of the U.S. Sponsor Finance business, we notified the SSLP on June 9, 2015 of our election to terminate, effective 90 days thereafter, our obligation to present senior secured lending investment opportunities to the SSLP prior to pursuing such opportunities for ourself. The SSLP continued to make new investments through June 30, 2015
62
with capital provided by us and GE. Subsequent to June 30, 2015, we and GE may provide capital to support the SSLP's funding of existing commitments and other amounts to its portfolio companies; however, we do not anticipate that we will make any investments in the SSLP related to new portfolio companies. We expect that the aggregate SSLP portfolio will decline over time as loans in the program are repaid or exited, and as a result the portion of our earnings attributable to our investment in the SSLP will decline over time as well.
As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, we and GE had agreed to make capital available to the SSLP of $11.5 billion and $11.0 billion, respectively, of which approximately $10.0 billion and $9.9 billion in aggregate principal amount, respectively, was funded. Additionally, as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the SSLP had commitments to fund various delayed draw investments to certain of its portfolio companies of $380.7 million and $484.3 million, respectively, which had been approved by the investment committee of the SSLP described above. As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the total amounts funded and/or committed to the SSLP by GE and us were $10.4 billion and $10.4 billion, respectively. All investments of the SSLP must be approved by the investment committee of the SSLP as described above.
As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, we had agreed to make available to the SSLP (subject to the approval of the investment committee of the SSLP as described above) approximately $2.4 billion and $2.3 billion, respectively, of which approximately $2.1 billion and $2.0 billion in aggregate principal amount, respectively, was funded. Additionally, as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, we had commitments to co-invest in the SSLP for our portion of the SSLP's commitments to fund delayed draw investments of up to $69.1 million and $92.5 million, respectively, bringing total amounts funded and/or committed to the SSLP by us to $2.2 billion and $2.1 billion, respectively.
As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the SSLP had total assets of $10.1 billion and $10.0 billion, respectively. As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, GE's investment in the SSLP consisted of senior notes of $7.6 billion and $7.6 billion, respectively, and SSLP Certificates of $298.5 million and $290.6 million, respectively. As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, we and GE owned 87.5% and 12.5%, respectively, of the outstanding SSLP Certificates.
The SSLP Certificates pay a weighted average coupon of LIBOR plus approximately 8.0% and also entitle the holders thereof to receive a portion of the excess cash flow from the loan portfolio, which may result in a return to the holders of the SSLP Certificates that is greater than the coupon. The SSLP Certificates are junior in right of payment to the senior notes held by GE.
As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the SSLP portfolio was comprised of all first lien senior secured loans to U.S. middle-market companies. As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, one loan was on non-accrual status, representing 1.0% and 1.0%, respectively, of the total loans at principal amount in the SSLP. The portfolio companies in the SSLP are in industries similar to the companies in our portfolio.
63
Below is a summary of the SSLP's portfolio, followed by a listing of the individual first lien senior secured loans in the SSLP's portfolio as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014:
|
As of | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(dollar amounts in millions)
|
June 30, 2015 |
December 31, 2014 |
|||||
Total first lien senior secured loans(1) |
$ | 9,992.1 | $ | 9,522.6 | |||
Weighted average yield on first lien senior secured loans(2) |
6.8 | % | 6.7 | % | |||
Number of borrowers in the SSLP |
52 | 50 | |||||
Largest loan to a single borrower(1) |
$ | 347.6 | $ | 331.5 | |||
Total of five largest loans to borrowers(1) |
$ | 1,659.6 | $ | 1,571.7 |
64
SSLP Loan Portfolio as of June 30, 2015
(dollar amounts in millions) Portfolio Company |
Business Description | Maturity Date | Stated Interest Rate(1) |
Principal Amount | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADG, LLC |
Dental services provider | 9/2019 | 8.1 | % | $ | 205.1 | ||||||
AMZ Holding Corp. |
Specialty chemicals manufacturer | 12/2018 | 6.8 | % | 234.0 | |||||||
Argon Medical Devices, Inc. |
Manufacturer and marketer of single-use specialty medical devices | 4/2018 | 6.5 | % | 217.4 | |||||||
Argotec LLC |
Producer of thermoplastic polyurethane film and sheet used for paint production, glass lamination, medical use, graphics, and textile lamination | 12/2019 | 7.5 | % | 92.4 | |||||||
Athletico Management, LLC and Accelerated Holdings, LLC |
Provider of outpatient rehabilitation services | 12/2020 | 6.3 | % | 323.4 | |||||||
Breg, Inc. |
Designer, manufacturer, and distributor of non-surgical orthopedic products for preventative, post-operative and rehabilitative use | 10/2020 | 6.5 | % | 149.6 | |||||||
Brewer Holdings Corp. and Zywave, Inc. |
Provider of software and technology-enabled content and analytical solutions to insurance brokers | 3/2021 | 8.0 | % | 249.4 | |||||||
Cambridge International, Inc. |
Manufacturer of custom designed and engineered metal products | 4/2018 | 8.0 | % | 80.6 | |||||||
CH Hold Corp. |
Collision repair company | 11/2019 | 5.5 | % | 347.6 | |||||||
Chariot Acquisition, LLC |
Distributor and designer of aftermarket golf cart parts and accessories | 1/2019 | 7.8 | % | 150.2 | |||||||
CIBT Holdings, Inc.(4) |
Expedited travel document processing services | 12/2018 | 6.8 | % | 204.1 | |||||||
Connoisseur Media, LLC |
Owner and operator of radio stations | 6/2019 | 7.3 | % | 130.5 | |||||||
CWD, LLC |
Supplier of automotive aftermarket brake parts | 6/2016 | 7.0 | % | 123.6 | |||||||
DFS Holding Company, Inc. |
Distributor of maintenance, repair, and operations parts, supplies, and equipment to the food service industry | 2/2022 | 6.5 | % | 193.5 | |||||||
Drayer Physical Therapy Institute, LLC |
Outpatient physical therapy provider | 7/2018 | 8.0 | % | 133.9 | |||||||
DTI Holdco, Inc.(2)(4) |
Provider of legal process outsourcing and managed services | 8/2020 | 5.8 | % | 298.8 | |||||||
ECI Purchaser Company, LLC |
Manufacturer of equipment to safely control pressurized gases | 12/2019 | 6.0 | % | 228.0 | |||||||
Excelligence Learning Corporation |
Developer, manufacturer and retailer of educational products | 12/2020 | 6.8 | % | 180.0 | |||||||
Gehl Foods, LLC(4) |
Producer of low-acid, aseptic food and beverage products | 3/2021 | 7.5 | % | 161.5 | |||||||
Gentle Communications, LLC |
Dental services provider | 6/2020 | 6.5 | % | 84.4 | |||||||
III US Holdings, LLC |
Provider of library automation software and systems | 6/2018 | 6.0 | % | 214.1 | |||||||
Implus Footcare, LLC(2) |
Provider of footwear and other accessories | 4/2021 | 7.0 | % | 264.0 | |||||||
Instituto de Banca y Comercio, Inc.(2)(4) |
Private school operator | 12/2016 | 95.1 | (5) | ||||||||
Intermedix Corporation(3) |
Revenue cycle management provider to the emergency healthcare industry | 12/2019 | 5.8 | % | 264.5 | |||||||
ISS Compressors Industries, Inc. |
Provider of repairs, refurbishments and services to the broader industrial end user markets | 6/2018 | 6.5 | % | 121.4 | |||||||
Laborie Medical Technologies Corp(4) |
Developer and manufacturer of medical equipment | 9/2019 | 7.3 | % | 199.9 | |||||||
Mavis Tire Supply LLC |
Auto parts retailer | 10/2020 | 6.3 | % | 183.6 | |||||||
MCH Holdings, Inc.(4) |
Healthcare professional provider | 1/2020 | 6.3 | % | 173.8 | |||||||
MWI Holdings, Inc.(2) |
Engineered springs, fasteners, and other precision components | 3/2019 | 7.4 | % | 257.8 | |||||||
Noranco Manufacturing (USA) Ltd. |
Supplier of complex machined and sheet metal components for the aerospace industry | 4/2019 | 6.8 | % | 155.7 | |||||||
Nordco Inc. |
Designer and manufacturer of railroad maintenance-of-way machinery | 8/2019 | 7.0 | % | 210.9 | |||||||
Oak Parent, Inc.(2) |
Manufacturer of athletic apparel | 4/2018 | 7.5 | % | 290.0 |
65
(dollar amounts in millions) Portfolio Company |
Business Description | Maturity Date | Stated Interest Rate(1) |
Principal Amount | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Palermo Finance Corporation |
Provider of mission-critical integrated public safety software and services to local, state, and federal agencies | 11/2020 | 7.0 | % | 189.5 | |||||||
Penn Detroit Diesel Allison, LLC |
Distributor of new equipment and aftermarket parts to the heavy-duty truck industry | 10/2019 | 7.3 | % | 71.2 | |||||||
PetroChoice Holdings, LLC |
Provider of lubrication solutions | 1/2017 | 10.0 | % | 235.5 | |||||||
Pretium Packaging, L.L.C.(4) |
Manufacturer and supplier of high performance plastic containers | 6/2020 | 6.3 | % | 218.2 | |||||||
Restaurant Technologies, Inc. |
Provider of bulk cooking oil management services to the restaurant and fast food service industries | 10/2021 | 8.0 | % | 230.0 | |||||||
Sanders Industries Holdings, Inc.(4) |
Elastomeric parts, mid-sized composite structures, and composite tooling | 5/2020 | 7.0 | % | 77.9 | |||||||
Selig Sealing Products, Inc. |
Manufacturer of container sealing products for rigid packaging applications | 10/2019 | 6.8 | % | 173.0 | |||||||
Singer Sewing Company |
Manufacturer of consumer sewing machines | 6/2017 | 7.3 | % | 194.0 | |||||||
Square Brands International, LLC |
Franchisor and operator of specialty battery and light bulb retail stores | 6/2021 | 6.7 | % | 200.0 | |||||||
STATS Acquisition, LLC |
Sports technology, data and content company | 6/2020 | 7.0 | % | 103.0 | |||||||
Strategic Partners, Inc.(4) |
Supplier of medical uniforms, specialized medical footwear and accessories | 8/2018 | 7.3 | % | 287.8 | |||||||
TA THI Buyer, Inc. and TA THI Parent, Inc.(2)(4) |
Collision repair company | 7/2020 | 6.5 | % | 345.1 | |||||||
The Linen Group |
Provider of outsourced commercial linen and laundry services | 8/2019 | 8.0 | % | 92.1 | |||||||
The Teaching Company, LLC(2)(4) |
Education publications provider | 3/2017 | 9.0 | % | 108.0 | |||||||
Towne Holdings, Inc. |
Provider of contracted hospitality services and parking systems | 12/2019 | 6.8 | % | 167.0 | |||||||
U.S. Anesthesia Partners, Inc.(3) |
Anesthesiology service provider | 12/2019 | 6.0 | % | 262.8 | |||||||
Universal Services of America, LP |
Provider of security officer and guard services | 7/2019 | 6.0 | % | 344.7 | |||||||
Urgent Cares of America Holdings I, LLC(4) |
Operator of urgent care clinics | 6/2022 | 7.0 | % | 110.0 | |||||||
WCI-Quantum Holdings, Inc.(4) |
Distributor of instructional products, services and resources | 10/2020 | 5.8 | % | 80.5 | |||||||
Woodstream Group, Inc. |
Pet products manufacturer | 5/2022 | 7.3 | % | 283.0 | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
$ | 9,992.1 | ||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
66
SSLP Loan Portfolio as of December 31, 2014
(dollar amounts in millions) Portfolio Company |
Business Description | Maturity Date |
Stated Interest Rate(1) |
Principal Amount |
Fair Value(2) |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADG, LLC |
Dental services provider | 9/2019 | 8.1 | % | $ | 212.6 | $ | 212.6 | |||||||
AMZ Holding Corp. |
Specialty chemicals manufacturer | 12/2018 | 6.8 | % | 235.2 | 230.5 | |||||||||
Argon Medical Devices, Inc. |
Manufacturer and marketer of single-use specialty medical devices | 4/2018 | 6.5 | % | 221.3 | 221.3 | |||||||||
Argotec LLC |
Producer of thermoplastic polyurethane film and sheet used for paint production, glass lamination, medical use, graphics, and textile lamination. | 12/2019 | 7.5 | % | 93.0 | 93.0 | |||||||||
Athletico Management, LLC and Accelerated Holdings, LLC(3) |
Provider of outpatient rehabilitation services | 12/2020 | 6.3 | % | 325.0 | 325.0 | |||||||||
Breg, Inc. |
Designer, manufacturer, and distributor of non-surgical orthopedic products for preventative, post-operative and rehabilitative use | 10/2020 | 6.5 | % | 150.0 | 150.0 | |||||||||
Brewer Holdings Corp. and Zywave, Inc. |
Provider of software and technology-enabled content and analytical solutions to insurance brokers | 11/2019 | 7.0 | % | 173.7 | 173.7 | |||||||||
Cambridge International, Inc. |
Manufacturer of custom designed and engineered metal products | 4/2018 | 8.0 | % | 82.9 | 82.1 | |||||||||
CH Hold Corp.(3) |
Collision repair company | 11/2019 | 5.5 | % | 298.5 | 298.5 | |||||||||
Chariot Acquisition, LLC |
Distributor and designer of aftermarket golf cart parts and accessories | 1/2019 | 7.8 | % | 152.2 | 152.2 | |||||||||
CIBT Holdings, Inc.(5) |
Expedited travel document processing services | 12/2018 | 6.8 | % | 204.4 | 204.4 | |||||||||
Connoisseur Media, LLC |
Owner and operator of radio stations | 6/2019 | 7.3 | % | 134.3 | 133.0 | |||||||||
CWD, LLC |
Supplier of automotive aftermarket brake parts | 6/2016 | 7.0 | % | 125.9 | 125.9 | |||||||||
Drayer Physical Therapy Institute, LLC |
Outpatient physical therapy provider | 7/2018 | 8.0 | % | 133.9 | 133.9 | |||||||||
Driven Brands, Inc.(3)(5) |
Automotive aftermarket car care franchisor | 3/2017 | 6.0 | % | 201.2 | 201.2 | |||||||||
DTI Holdco, Inc.(3)(5) |
Provider of legal process outsourcing and managed services | 8/2020 | 5.8 | % | 300.3 | 300.3 | |||||||||
ECI Purchaser Company, LLC |
Manufacturer of equipment to safely control pressurized gases | 12/2019 | 6.0 | % | 235.0 | 232.6 | |||||||||
Excelligence Learning Corporation |
Developer, manufacturer and retailer of educational products | 12/2020 | 6.8 | % | 180.0 | 180.0 | |||||||||
Fleischmann's Vinegar Company, Inc. |
Manufacturer and marketer of industrial vinegar products | 5/2016 | 8.0 | % | 70.4 | 70.4 | |||||||||
Gentle Communications, LLC |
Dental services provider | 6/2020 | 6.5 | % | 84.8 | 84.0 | |||||||||
III US Holdings, LLC |
Provider of library automation software and systems | 6/2018 | 6.0 | % | 215.2 | 213.0 | |||||||||
Implus Footcare, LLC(5) |
Provider of footwear and other accessories | 4/2019 | 6.8 | % | 264.9 | 264.9 | |||||||||
Instituto de Banca y Comercio, Inc.(3)(5) |
Private school operator | 12/2016 | 91.5 | 73.2 | (6) | ||||||||||
Intermedix Corporation(4) |
Revenue cycle management provider to the emergency healthcare industry | 12/2019 | 5.8 | % | 267.9 | 267.9 | |||||||||
Laborie Medical Technologies Corp(5) |
Developer and manufacturer of medical equipment | 10/2018 | 6.8 | % | 125.4 | 125.4 | |||||||||
Mavis Tire Supply LLC |
Auto parts retailer | 10/2020 | 6.3 | % | 184.5 | 184.5 | |||||||||
MCH Holdings, Inc.(5) |
Healthcare professional provider | 1/2020 | 6.3 | % | 179.1 | 179.1 | |||||||||
MWI Holdings, Inc.(3) |
Engineered springs, fasteners, and other precision components | 3/2019 | 7.4 | % | 259.2 | 259.2 | |||||||||
Noranco Manufacturing (USA) Ltd. |
Supplier of complex machined and sheet metal components for the aerospace industry | 4/2019 | 6.8 | % | 156.3 | 156.3 | |||||||||
Nordco Inc. |
Designer and manufacturer of railroad maintenance-of-way machinery | 8/2019 | 7.0 | % | 217.3 | 217.3 | |||||||||
Oak Parent, Inc.(3) |
Manufacturer of athletic apparel | 4/2018 | 7.5 | % | 297.6 | 297.6 | |||||||||
Palermo Finance Corporation |
Provider of mission-critical integrated public safety software and services to local, state, and federal agencies | 11/2020 | 7.0 | % | 135.0 | 135.0 | |||||||||
Penn Detroit Diesel Allison, LLC |
Distributor of new equipment and aftermarket parts to the heavy-duty truck industry | 10/2019 | 7.3 | % | 71.6 | 71.6 | |||||||||
PetroChoice Holdings, LLC |
Provider of lubrication solutions | 1/2017 | 10.0 | % | 238.5 | 238.5 | |||||||||
PODS Funding Corp. II(3) |
Storage and warehousing | 12/2018 | 7.0 | % | 331.5 | 331.5 | |||||||||
Pretium Packaging, L.L.C(5) |
Manufacturer and supplier of high performance plastic containers | 6/2020 | 6.2 | % | 209.2 | 209.2 | |||||||||
Protective Industries, Inc.(3)(5) |
Plastic protection products | 10/2019 | 6.3 | % | 275.5 | 275.5 | |||||||||
Restaurant Technologies, Inc. |
Provider of bulk cooking oil management services to the restaurant and fast food service industries | 6/2018 | 7.0 | % | 198.5 | 198.5 | |||||||||
Sanders Industries Holdings, Inc.(5) |
Elastomeric parts, mid-sized composite structures, and composite tooling | 5/2020 | 7.0 | % | 83.8 | 83.8 | |||||||||
Selig Sealing Products, Inc. |
Manufacturer of container sealing products for rigid packaging applications | 10/2019 | 6.8 | % | 188.5 | 188.5 | |||||||||
Singer Sewing Company |
Manufacturer of consumer sewing machines | 6/2017 | 7.3 | % | 195.0 | 191.1 | |||||||||
STATS Acquisition, LLC |
Sports technology, data and content company | 6/2020 | 7.0 | % | 103.5 | 103.5 | |||||||||
Strategic Partners, Inc.(5) |
Supplier of medical uniforms, specialized medical footwear and accessories | 8/2018 | 7.3 | % | 289.3 | 289.3 |
67
(dollar amounts in millions) Portfolio Company |
Business Description | Maturity Date |
Stated Interest Rate(1) |
Principal Amount |
Fair Value(2) |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TA THI Buyer, Inc. and TA THI Parent, Inc.(5) |
Collision repair company | 7/2020 | 6.5 | % | 312.7 | 312.7 | |||||||||
The Linen Group |
Provider of outsourced commercial linen and laundry services | 8/2019 | 8.0 | % | 92.6 | 92.6 | |||||||||
The Teaching Company, LLC(3)(5) |
Education publications provider | 3/2017 | 9.0 | % | 109.2 | 108.1 | |||||||||
Towne Holdings, Inc. |
Provider of contracted hospitality services and parking systems | 12/2019 | 6.8 | % | 167.8 | 167.8 | |||||||||
U.S. Anesthesia Partners, Inc.(3)(4) |
Anesthesiology service provider | 12/2019 | 6.0 | % | 264.0 | 264.0 | |||||||||
Universal Services of America, LP |
Provider of security officer and guard services | 7/2019 | 6.0 | % | 302.2 | 302.2 | |||||||||
WCI-Quantum Holdings, Inc.(5) |
Distributor of instructional products, services and resources | 10/2020 | 5.8 | % | 80.7 | 80.7 | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
$ | 9,522.6 | $ | 9,487.1 | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The amortized cost and fair value of our SSLP Certificates was $2.1 billion and $2.1 billion, respectively, as of June 30, 2015, and $2.0 billion and $2.1 billion, respectively, as of December 31, 2014. As described above, the SSLP Certificates pay a weighted average coupon of LIBOR plus approximately 8.0% and also entitle the holders thereof to receive a portion of the excess cash flow from the underlying loan portfolio, which may result in a return to the holders of the SSLP Certificates that is greater than both the coupon on the SSLP Certificates as well as the weighted average yield on the SSLP's portfolio of 6.8% and 6.7% as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. Our yield on our investment in the SSLP at amortized cost and fair value was 13.8% and 13.7%, respectively, as of June 30, 2015, and 13.8% and 13.5%, respectively, as of December 31, 2014. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, we earned interest income of $69.9 million and $138.2 million, respectively, from our investment in the SSLP Certificates. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, we earned interest income of $68.0 million and $135.7 million, respectively, from our investment in the SSLP Certificates.
We are also entitled to certain fees in connection with the SSLP. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, in connection with the SSLP, we earned capital structuring service, sourcing and other fees totaling $18.7 million and $33.4 million, respectively. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, in connection with the SSLP, we earned capital structuring service, sourcing and other fees totaling $16.5 million and $29.0 million, respectively.
68
Selected financial information for the SSLP as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, and for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, was as follows:
|
As of | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(in millions)
|
June 30, 2015 | December 31, 2014 | |||||
Selected Balance Sheet Information: |
|||||||
Investments in loans receivable, net |
$ | 9,900.9 | $ | 9,442.6 | |||
Cash and other assets |
160.1 | 563.3 | |||||
| | | | | | | |
Total assets |
$ | 10,061.0 | $ | 10,005.9 | |||
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Senior notes |
$ | 7,619.3 | $ | 7,613.7 | |||
Other liabilities |
75.7 | 77.3 | |||||
| | | | | | | |
Total liabilities |
7,695.0 | 7,691.0 | |||||
Subordinated certificates and members' capital |
2,366.0 | 2,314.9 | |||||
| | | | | | | |
Total liabilities and members' capital |
$ | 10,061.0 | $ | 10,005.9 | |||
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
|
For the Six Months Ended June 30, |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2015 | 2014 | |||||
Selected Statement of Operations Information: |
|||||||
Total interest and other income |
$ | 338.1 | $ | 325.5 | |||
Interest expense |
115.0 |
114.3 |
|||||
Management and sourcing fees |
36.5 | 34.1 | |||||
Other expenses |
29.0 | 28.0 | |||||
| | | | | | | |
Total expenses |
180.5 | 176.4 | |||||
| | | | | | | |
Net income |
$ |
157.6 |
$ |
149.1 |
|||
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Senior Direct Lending Program
In June 2015, we announced the establishment of a new joint venture with Varagon Capital Partners ("Varagon") to make first lien senior secured loans, including stretch senior and unitranche loans, to middle-market companies. The new joint venture will be called the Senior Direct Lending Program (the "SDLP") and it is expected that the SDLP will commit and hold individual loans of up to $300 million. We may co-invest with the SDLP to accommodate larger transactions. It is expected that the SDLP will be co-managed by Varagon and a subsidiary of Ares Management.
69
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014
Operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 were as follows:
|
For the Three Months Ended June 30, |
For the Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(in millions)
|
2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||
Total investment income |
$ | 249.5 | $ | 224.9 | $ | 502.7 | $ | 464.6 | |||||
Total expenses |
138.4 | 130.0 | 266.4 | 252.0 | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income before income taxes |
111.1 | 94.9 | 236.3 | 212.6 | |||||||||
Income tax expense, including excise tax |
2.6 | 2.9 | 6.1 | 8.3 | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income |
108.5 | 92.0 | 230.2 | 204.3 | |||||||||
Net realized gains (losses) on investments and foreign currency transactions |
24.2 | (48.5 | ) | 56.0 | (36.4 | ) | |||||||
Net unrealized gains (losses) on investments and foreign currency transactions |
13.8 | 99.3 | (35.3 | ) | 92.0 | ||||||||
Realized losses on extinguishment of debt |
| | (3.8 | ) | (0.1 | ) | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net increase in stockholders' equity resulting from operations |
$ | 146.5 | $ | 142.8 | $ | 247.1 | $ | 259.8 | |||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income can vary substantially from period to period due to various factors, including acquisitions, the level of new investment commitments, the recognition of realized gains and losses and unrealized appreciation and depreciation. As a result, quarterly comparisons of net income may not be meaningful.
Investment Income
|
For the Three Months Ended June 30, |
For the Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(in millions)
|
2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||
Interest income from investments |
$ | 201.3 | $ | 176.2 | $ | 399.9 | $ | 349.7 | |||||
Capital structuring service fees |
23.1 | 21.7 | 43.2 | 42.6 | |||||||||
Dividend income |
14.8 | 16.7 | 39.4 | 47.5 | |||||||||
Management and other fees |
6.2 | 6.1 | 12.3 | 12.0 | |||||||||
Other income |
4.1 | 4.2 | 7.9 | 12.8 | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total investment income |
$ | 249.5 | $ | 224.9 | $ | 502.7 | $ | 464.6 | |||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The increase in interest income from investments for the three months ended June 30, 2015 from the comparable period in 2014 was primarily due to an increase in the size of our portfolio, which increased from an average of $7.8 billion at amortized cost for the three months ended June 30, 2014 to an average of $8.4 billion at amortized cost for the comparable period in 2015. The increase in capital structuring service fees for the three months ended June 30, 2015 from the comparable period in 2014 was primarily due to the increase in the weighted average capital structuring service fees received on new investment commitments, which increased from 2.1% for the three months ended June 30, 2014 to 2.8% in the comparable period in 2015, partially offset by the decrease in new investment commitments, which decreased from $1.0 billion for the three months ended June 30, 2014 to $0.8 billion for the comparable period in 2015. Dividend income for the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 included dividends received from IHAM, a wholly owned portfolio company, totaling $10.0 million and $10.0 million, respectively. Also during the three months ended June 30,
70
2015, we received $1.8 million in other non-recurring dividends from non-income producing equity securities compared to $2.9 million for the comparable period in 2014.
The increase in interest income from investments for the six months ended June 30, 2015 from the comparable period in 2014 was primarily due to an increase in the size of our portfolio, which increased from an average of $7.7 billion at amortized cost for the six months ended June 30, 2014 to an average of $8.6 billion at amortized cost for the comparable period in 2015. The increase in capital structuring service fees for the six months ended June 30, 2015 from the comparable period in 2014 was due to the increase in the weighted average capital structuring service fees received on new investment commitments, which increased from 2.3% for the six months ended June 30, 2014 to 3.3% in the comparable period in 2015, partially offset by the decrease in new investment commitments, which decreased from $1.9 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2014 to $1.3 billion for the comparable period in 2015. Dividend income for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 included dividends received from IHAM totaling $30.0 million and $30.0 million, respectively. The dividends received from IHAM for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 included additional dividends of $10.0 million for each period that were paid in addition to the quarterly dividends generally paid by IHAM. IHAM paid the additional dividends out of accumulated earnings that had previously been retained by IHAM. Also during the six months ended June 30, 2015, we received $3.3 million in other non-recurring dividends from non-income producing equity securities compared to $9.5 million for the comparable period in 2014. The decrease in other income for the six months ended June 30, 2015 from the comparable period in 2014 was primarily attributable to lower amendment fees.
Operating Expenses
|
For the Three Months Ended June 30, |
For the Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(in millions)
|
2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||
Interest and credit facility fees |
$ | 56.4 | $ | 53.2 | $ | 115.0 | $ | 105.6 | |||||
Base management fees |
33.0 | 30.7 | 66.9 | 60.8 | |||||||||
Income based fees |
29.0 | 25.5 | 58.3 | 53.9 | |||||||||
Capital gains incentive fees |
7.7 | 10.2 | 3.5 | 11.1 | |||||||||
Administrative fees |
3.5 | 2.8 | 7.0 | 6.6 | |||||||||
Other general and administrative |
8.8 | 7.6 | 15.7 | 14.0 | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total operating expenses |
$ | 138.4 | $ | 130.0 | $ | 266.4 | $ | 252.0 | |||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest and credit facility fees for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, were comprised of the following:
|
For the Three Months Ended June 30, |
For the Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(in millions)
|
2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||
Stated interest expense |
$ | 45.2 | $ | 42.2 | $ | 92.4 | $ | 83.7 | |||||
Facility fees |
2.9 | 3.2 | 5.8 | 6.6 | |||||||||
Amortization of debt issuance costs |
4.3 | 4.0 | 8.7 | 7.9 | |||||||||
Accretion of net discount on notes payable |
4.0 | 3.8 | 8.1 | 7.4 | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total interest and credit facility fees |
$ | 56.4 | $ | 53.2 | $ | 115.0 | $ | 105.6 | |||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Stated interest expense for the three months ended June 30, 2015 increased from the comparable period in 2014 primarily due to the increase in the average principal amount of debt outstanding, partially offset by a decrease in our weighted average stated interest rate of our debt
71
outstanding. For the three months ended June 30, 2015, our average principal debt outstanding increased to $3.5 billion as compared to $3.1 billion for the comparable period in 2014, and the weighted average stated interest rate on our outstanding debt was 5.2% for the three months ended June 30, 2015 as compared to 5.4% for the comparable period in 2014. Stated interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2015 increased from the comparable period in 2014 primarily due to the increase in the average principal amount of debt outstanding, partially offset by a decrease in our weighted average stated interest rate of our debt outstanding. For the six months ended June 30, 2015, our average principal debt outstanding increased to $3.6 billion as compared to $3.1 billion for the comparable period in 2014, and the weighted average stated interest rate on our outstanding debt was 5.2% for the six months ended June 30, 2015 as compared to 5.5% for the comparable period in 2014.
The increase in base management fees and our income based fees for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 from the comparable period in 2014 were primarily due to the increases in the size of the portfolio in the case of base management fees and in the case of income based fees, the related increase in net investment income excluding income based fees and capital gains incentive fees.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 the capital gains incentive fee expense accrual calculated in accordance with GAAP was $7.7 million and $3.5 million, respectively. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, the capital gains incentive fee expense accrual calculated in accordance with GAAP was $10.2 million and $11.1 million, respectively. Capital gains incentive fee expense accrual for the three months ended June 30, 2015 decreased from the comparable period in 2014 primarily due to lower net gains on investments and foreign currency transactions, which decreased from $50.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014 to $38.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015. Capital gains incentive fee expense accrual for the six months ended June 30, 2015 decreased from the comparable period in 2014 primarily due to lower net gains of $16.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 as compared to net gains of $55.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014. The capital gains incentive fee accrued under GAAP includes an accrual related to unrealized capital appreciation, whereas the capital gains incentive fee actually payable under our investment advisory and management agreement does not. There can be no assurance that such unrealized capital appreciation will be realized in the future. The accrual for any capital gains incentive fee under GAAP in a given period may result in an additional expense if such cumulative amount is greater than in the prior period or a reduction of previously recorded expense if such cumulative amount is less than in the prior period. If such cumulative amount is negative, then there is no accrual. As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the total capital gains incentive fee accrual calculated in accordance with GAAP was $72.4 million and $93.0 million, respectively. As of June 30, 2015, there was no capital gains incentive fee actually payable under our investment advisory and management agreement. As of December 31, 2014, the capital gains incentive fee actually payable under our investment advisory and management agreement was $24.0 million. The $24.0 million payable as of December 31, 2014 was paid in the first quarter of 2015. See Note 3 to our consolidated financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, for more information on the base management fees, income based fees and capital gains incentive fees.
Administrative fees represent fees paid to Ares Operations for our allocable portion of overhead and other expenses incurred by Ares Operations in performing its obligations under the administration agreement, including our allocable portion of the cost of certain of our executive officers and their respective staffs. Other general and administrative expenses include professional fees, rent, insurance, depreciation and director's fees, among other costs.
Income Tax Expense, Including Excise Tax
We have elected to be treated as a RIC under the Code and operate in a manner so as to qualify for the tax treatment applicable to RICs. To qualify as a RIC, we must generally (among other requirements) timely distribute to our stockholders at least 90% of our investment company taxable
72
income, as defined by the Code, for each year. In order to maintain our RIC status, we have made and intend to continue to make the requisite distributions to our stockholders which will generally relieve us from corporate-level income taxes.
Depending on the level of taxable income earned in a tax year, we may choose to carry forward such taxable income in excess of current year dividend distributions from such current year taxable income into the next tax year and pay a 4% excise tax on such income, as required. If we determine that our estimated current year taxable income will be in excess of estimated dividend distributions for the current year from such income, we accrue excise tax on estimated excess taxable income as such taxable income is earned. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, we recorded a net expense of $2.4 million and $4.0 million, respectively, for U.S. federal excise tax. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, we recorded a net expense of $1.5 million and $4.0 million, respectively, for U.S. federal excise tax.
Certain of our consolidated subsidiaries are subject to U.S. federal and state income taxes. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, we recorded a tax expense of approximately $0.2 million and $2.1 million, respectively, for these subsidiaries. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, we recorded a tax expense of approximately $1.4 million and $4.3 million, respectively, for these subsidiaries.
Net Realized Gains/Losses
During the three months ended June 30, 2015, we had $756.6 million of sales, repayments or exits of investments resulting in $24.9 million of net realized gains on investments. These sales, repayments or exits included $42.9 million of investments sold to IHAM and certain vehicles managed by IHAM. A net realized gain of $0.1 million was recorded on these transactions. See Note 4 to our consolidated financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 for more detail on IHAM and its managed vehicles. Net realized gains on investments of $24.9 million were comprised of $26.7 million of gross realized gains and $1.8 million of gross realized losses.
The net realized gains on investments during the three months ended June 30, 2015 consisted of the following:
(in millions) Portfolio Company |
Net Realized Gains (Losses) |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
TAP Holdings, LLC |
$ | 11.2 | ||
Driven Brands, Inc. |
5.5 | |||
Implus Footcare, LLC |
3.5 | |||
Woodstream Corporation |
3.2 | |||
Varsity Brands Holding Co., Inc. |
1.1 | |||
GHS Interactive Security, LLC |
(1.1 | ) | ||
Other, net |
1.5 | |||
| | | | |
Total |
$ | 24.9 | ||
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
During the three months ended June 30, 2015, we also recognized net realized loss on foreign currency transactions of $0.7 million.
During the three months ended June 30, 2014, we had $692.3 million of sales, repayments or exits of investments resulting in $47.4 million of net realized losses. These sales, repayments or exits included $64.5 million of investments sold to IHAM or certain vehicles managed by IHAM. No realized gains or losses were recognized on these transactions. Net realized losses of $47.4 million on investments were comprised of $4.6 million of gross realized gains and $52.0 million of gross realized losses.
73
The net realized losses on investments during the three months ended June 30, 2014 consisted of the following:
(in millions) Portfolio Company |
Net Realized Gains (Losses) |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
Dialysis Newco, Inc. |
$ | 1.7 | ||
Geotrace Technologies, Inc. |
(2.9 | ) | ||
CitiPostal Inc. |
(20.2 | ) | ||
MVL Group, Inc. |
(27.7 | ) | ||
Other, net |
1.7 | |||
| | | | |
Total |
$ | (47.4 | ) | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
During the three months ended June 30, 2014, we also recognized net realized losses on foreign currency transactions of $1.1 million.
During the six months ended June 30, 2015, we had $1.9 billion of sales, repayments or exits of investments resulting in $52.1 million of net realized gains on investments. These sales, repayments or exits included $300.8 million of investments sold to IHAM and certain vehicles managed by IHAM. A net realized gain of $0.2 million was recorded on these transactions. See Note 4 to our consolidated financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 for more detail on IHAM and its managed vehicles. Net realized gains on investments of $52.1 million were comprised of $55.4 million of gross realized gains and $3.3 million of gross realized losses.
The net realized gains on investments during the six months ended June 30, 2015 consisted of the following:
(in millions) Portfolio Company |
Net Realized Gains (Losses) |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
Tripwire, Inc. |
$ | 13.8 | ||
TAP Holdings, LLC |
11.2 | |||
Protective Industries, Inc. |
8.1 | |||
Driven Brands, Inc. |
5.5 | |||
Implus Footcare, LLC |
3.5 | |||
Woodstream Corporation |
3.2 | |||
Panda Temple Power, LLC |
2.4 | |||
Varsity Brands Holding Co., Inc. |
1.3 | |||
GHS Interactive Security, LLC |
(1.1 | ) | ||
Other, net |
4.2 | |||
| | | | |
Total |
$ | 52.1 | ||
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
During the six months ended June 30, 2015, we also recognized net realized gains on foreign currency transactions of $3.9 million. In addition, during the six months ended June 30, 2015, we redeemed the entire outstanding $143.8 million principal amount of the February 2022 Notes (defined below). The total redemption price (including accrued and unpaid interest) was $144.6 million, which resulted in a realized loss on the extinguishment of debt of $3.8 million.
During the six months ended June 30, 2014, we had $1,360.2 million of sales, repayments or exits of investments resulting in $35.5 million of net realized losses. These sales, repayments or exits included $64.5 million of investments sold to IHAM or certain vehicles managed by IHAM. No realized gains or losses were recognized on these transactions. Net realized losses of $35.5 million on investments were comprised of $16.7 million of gross realized gains and $52.2 million of gross realized losses.
74
The net realized losses on investments during the six months ended June 30, 2014 consisted of the following:
(in millions) Portfolio Company |
Net Realized Gains (Losses) |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
JHP Group Holdings, Inc. |
$ | 1.9 | ||
Dialysis Newco, Inc. |
1.7 | |||
Orion Foods, LLC |
1.6 | |||
La Paloma Generating Company, LLC |
1.6 | |||
Magnacare Holdings, Inc. |
1.3 | |||
Imperial Capital Group LLC |
1.3 | |||
Stag-Parkway, Inc. |
1.2 | |||
Eberle Design, Inc. |
1.1 | |||
Geotrace Technologies, Inc. |
(2.9 | ) | ||
CitiPostal Inc. |
(20.2 | ) | ||
MVL Group, Inc. |
(27.7 | ) | ||
Other, net |
3.6 | |||
| | | | |
Total |
$ | (35.5 | ) | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
During the six months ended June 30, 2014, we also recognized net realized losses on foreign currency transactions of $0.9 million. In addition, during the six months ended June 30, 2014, we purchased $0.4 million aggregate principal amount of the 2047 Notes (as defined below) and as a result of these transactions, we recognized realized losses of $0.1 million.
Net Unrealized Gains/Losses
We value our portfolio investments quarterly and the changes in value are recorded as unrealized gains or losses in the consolidated statement of operations. Net unrealized gains and losses for our portfolio for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, were comprised of the following:
|
For the Three Months Ended June 30, |
For the Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(in millions)
|
2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||
U |