Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

  Filed by the Registrant ý

 

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o

 

Check the appropriate box:

 

o

 

Preliminary Proxy Statement

 

o

 

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

 

ý

 

Definitive Proxy Statement

 

o

 

Definitive Additional Materials

 

o

 

Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

AmerisourceBergen Corporation

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
         
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

ý

 

No fee required.

o

 

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
    (1)   Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
        
 
    (2)   Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
        
 
    (3)   Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
        
 
    (4)   Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
        
 
    (5)   Total fee paid:
        
 

o

 

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

o

 

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

 

 

(1)

 

Amount Previously Paid:
        
 
    (2)   Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
        
 
    (3)   Filing Party:
        
 
    (4)   Date Filed:
        
 

Table of Contents

GRAPHIC


Table of Contents

LOGO

NOTICE OF 2018 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS


TIME AND DATE:

 

2:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on Thursday, March 1, 2018

PLACE:

 

Ritz-Carlton Golf Resort
2600 Tiburon Drive
Naples, Florida 34109

ITEMS OF BUSINESS:

 

1.

 

To elect the ten director nominees named in the accompanying proxy statement (or, if necessary, any substitute nominees selected by the Board of Directors), each to serve until the 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified;

 

 

2.

 

To ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2018;

 

 

3.

 

To conduct an advisory vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers;

 

 

4.

 

To approve an amendment and restatement of the AmerisourceBergen Corporation 2011 Employee Stock Purchase Plan;

 

 

5.

 

To vote on the stockholder proposals set forth in the proxy statement, if properly presented at the 2018 Annual Meeting; and

 

 

6.

 

To transact any other business properly coming before the meeting.

WHO MAY VOTE:

 

Stockholders of record on January 2, 2018.

DATE OF AVAILABILITY:

 

This notice and proxy statement, together with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017, are being made available to stockholders on or about January 19, 2018.

 

    By order of the Board of Directors,

 

 

GRAPHIC

 

 

HYUNG J. BAK
Senior Vice President, Group General Counsel and Secretary


   

 

 

 

Important Notice Regarding Availability of Proxy Materials for AmerisourceBergen's
Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be Held on March 1, 2018.

The proxy statement and Annual Report on Form 10-K are available at investor.amerisourcebergen.com.






   

Table of Contents

LOGO

January 19, 2018

Dear Stockholder:

We are pleased to invite you to attend our 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders on Thursday, March 1, 2018 at 2:00 p.m. Eastern Time. The meeting will be held at the Ritz-Carlton Golf Resort, 2600 Tiburon Drive, Naples, Florida. The Notice of the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and the proxy statement describe the items of business for the meeting. At the meeting we will also report on AmerisourceBergen's performance and operations during fiscal year 2017 and respond to stockholder questions.

Your vote is very important. Whether or not you plan to attend the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, we urge you to vote and to submit your proxy over the Internet, by telephone or by mail. If you are a registered stockholder and attend the meeting, you may revoke the proxy and vote your shares in person. If you hold your shares through a bank or broker and want to vote your shares in person at the meeting, please contact your bank or broker to obtain a legal proxy.

At AmerisourceBergen, we believe that effective governance is critical to a successful long-term strategy. We remain committed to a strong and independent Board and constructive stockholder engagement. On behalf of the entire Board, we encourage you to read more about our robust governance structure in the enclosed proxy statement.

Thank you for your support.

Sincerely,    

GRAPHIC

 

GRAPHIC

STEVEN H. COLLIS
Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer

 

JANE E. HENNEY, M.D.
Lead Independent Director

Table of Contents


JANUARY 19, 2018

AMERISOURCEBERGEN CORPORATION
1300 MORRIS DRIVE
CHESTERBROOK, PA 19087

PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2018 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
  Page

Highlights of Our Corporate Governance Practices and Policies

 
1

About the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Voting at the Meeting

 
4

Item 1—Election of Directors

 
7

Additional Information about the Directors, the Board and the Board Committees

 
15

Codes of Ethics

 
19

Corporate Governance

 
20

Stockholder Engagement

 
25

Stockholder Recommendations for Director Nominees

 
26

Audit Matters

 
26

Audit Committee Financial Experts

 
26

Report of the Audit Committee

 
26

Policy for Pre-Approval of Audit and Non-Audit Services

 
27

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm's Fees

 
28

Item 2—Ratification of Appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as AmerisourceBergen's Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for Fiscal Year 2018

 
28

Compensation Committee Matters

 
29

Executive Compensation

 
31

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

 
31

Compensation Committee Report

 
43

Executive Compensation Tables

 
44

Employment Agreements

 
51

Potential Payments Upon Termination of Employment or Change in Control

 
51

Certain Transactions

 
56

Item 3—Advisory Vote to Approve the Compensation of our Named Executive Officers

 
58

Beneficial Ownership of Common Stock

 
58

Equity Compensation Plan Information

 
61

Item 4—Approval of an Amendment and Restatement of the AmerisourceBergen Corporation 2011 Employee Stock Purchase Plan

 
62

Item 5—Stockholder Proposal

 
67

Item 6—Stockholder Proposal

 
69

Item 7—Stockholder Proposal

 
71

Item 8—Stockholder Proposal

 
74

Table of Contents

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

  77

Availability of Form 10-K

 
77

Requirements for Submission of Proxy Proposals, Nomination of Directors and Other Business of Stockholders

 
78

Appendix A—Supplemental Information: GAAP to Non-GAAP Reconciliation

 
A-1

Appendix B—Form of Amended and Restated AmerisourceBergen Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan

 
B-1

Table of Contents


HIGHLIGHTS OF OUR CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRACTICES AND POLICIES

Our Board consistently seeks to implement leading practices and policies in corporate governance, with emphasis on maintaining the Board's independence to provide effective oversight of management and ensure accountability to our stockholders. Below, we highlight our key corporate governance practices and policies:

  Board of Directors
   
    Independence       The majority of our directors are independent (eight out of ten). Our corporate governance principles require us to maintain a minimum of 70% independent directors on our Board (see page 8).
  Independence of Key Oversight Committees     All members of our Audit Committee, Compensation and Succession Planning Committee and Governance and Nominating Committee are independent and meet applicable SEC and NYSE standards (see page 22).
     
    Lead Independent Director       Our corporate governance principles require the election of a Lead Independent Director whenever our Chief Executive Officer also serves as Chairman of the Board and clearly define the Lead Independent Director's authority and significant responsibilities in the governance of our Board (see page 20).
  Diversity     Our directors have diverse business experiences, backgrounds and expertise in a wide range of fields, all of which are critical to understanding our businesses, competitive position and risks. Our Board has a long-standing receptiveness to gender and ethnic diversity and is especially proud of the representation on our Board of three leading women in the fields of business, medicine, and pharmaceuticals and a leading African-American businessman with extensive experience in corporate governance.
     
    Overboarding Policy       Pursuant to our overboarding policy, if our Chief Executive Officer serves as a director, he or she may only serve on the board of one other public company. Non-employee directors should not serve on more than three other public company boards (see page 9).
  Tenure Policy     Our policy for directors' tenure provides that a director will resign at the annual meeting of stockholders following his or her 75th birthday and a director will tender his or her resignation for consideration by the Governance and Nominating Committee when his or her employment or principal business association changes materially. A director who is an employee will resign when he or she retires or is no longer employed by us.
     
    Succession Planning       We undertake succession planning and maintain an emergency succession plan for our Chief Executive Officer (see page 21).
  Refreshment     Four of our nine non-employee directors have served on the Board for five years or less. Additionally, we encourage our Board to rotate its committee Chairs on a regular basis and each current committee Chair has served in such position for five years or less.
     
    Annual Evaluation Process       Our Board has a comprehensive annual evaluation process for directors and each committee, which is led by the Chair of our Governance and Nominating Committee and the Board's Lead Independent Director. The Governance and Nominating Committee and the full Board also conduct an annual review and update of our corporate governance principles and committee charters (see page 24).

GRAPHIC       1


Table of Contents

  Risk Oversight     Our full Board and each of our Board committees actively engage in risk assessment and management for all aspects of our business, including our compensation policies and practices, with certain specific responsibilities for risk oversight also designated in the committee charters and our corporate governance principles. Our corporate officers and senior managers report on risk exposure at regular intervals to the appropriate committee or full Board.
     
    Stockholder Communication and Engagement       Our corporate governance principles outline the procedures for stockholders to communicate and seek engagement with our Board (see page 25).
    Executive Compensation

   
    Alignment with Stockholders' Interests       We align executive compensation with AmerisourceBergen Corporation's performance through performance metrics. We also require executives to adhere to stock ownership guidelines and holding requirements that align their interests with those of our stockholders and encourage long-term growth (see page 32).
  Clawback     We have the right to claw back the value of cash and equity awards held by current and former executives as a result of misconduct, including misconduct that leads to the restatement of our financial statements (see page 40).
     
    Independent Compensation Consultant       The consultant to our Compensation and Succession Planning Committee provides no other services to AmerisourceBergen Corporation (see page 30).
    Rights of Stockholders

   
    Annual Election of Directors       All directors of our Board are elected annually.
  Majority Vote Standard     Our bylaws and corporate governance principles establish majority voting standards for the election of directors and require each director nominee to tender an irrevocable resignation prior to each annual meeting in the event an incumbent director does not receive the required votes for re-election (see page 25).
     
    Removal of Directors With or Without Cause       Our bylaws and our certificate of incorporation permit stockholders to remove directors with or without cause.
  Right to Call Special Meetings     Stockholders with at least 25% of the outstanding shares of our common stock have the right to call special meetings.
     
    Proxy Access       A stockholder, or a group of up to 20 stockholders, who have continuously owned at least 3% of our outstanding common stock for three years or more may nominate directors to fill up to the greater of two or 20% of the available board seats (see page 26).
  Annual Say-on-Pay Vote     We have an annual say-on-pay vote (see page 58).
     
    No Supermajority Requirement       Majority vote is required for stockholder action.
  No Poison Pill     We do not have a "poison pill" stockholder rights agreement in place.
     

2       GRAPHIC


Table of Contents

    Corporate Citizenship

   
    Philosophy       We are proud of our stated purpose of being united in our responsibility to create healthier futures. We are committed to fulfilling our purpose in part through a commitment to sustainability and social responsibility.
  Environment     We started responding to the CDP's Climate Change Survey in 2016 with information on our largest business unit and expanded to enterprise-wide information in our 2017 response.
     
    Sustainability       We have implemented practices that reduce energy use and waste, such as our deployment of a data management system to more efficiently allocate and track usage of resources.
  Social Responsibility     We are committed to the communities in which we operate as evidenced by various efforts, including our philanthropic activities. In 2017, we announced a partnership with Walgreens and other leading health care organizations to provide safe medication disposal kiosks at approximately 1,500 Walgreens stores nationwide, with an emphasis on locations near military bases and other areas where the opioid epidemic has challenged communities.
     
    Workplace Culture       AmerisourceBergen is committed to fostering an accepting and collaborative work environment. We received a perfect score on the 2018 Corporate Equality Index, a national benchmarking survey and report on corporate policies and practices related to LGBTQ workplace equality.

For further details, please see the full discussion relating to our corporate governance policies and practices and our leadership structure in this proxy statement under the section titled "Corporate Governance."

GRAPHIC       3


Table of Contents


ABOUT THE 2018 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS AND VOTING AT THE MEETING

Why am I being furnished this proxy statement?

The Board of Directors of AmerisourceBergen Corporation (the "Company," "AmerisourceBergen," "we" or "us") is furnishing this proxy statement in connection with its solicitation of proxies for use at the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on March 1, 2018, and at any adjournments thereof. Our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017 accompanies this notice and proxy statement, but is not incorporated as a part of the proxy statement and is not to be regarded as part of the proxy solicitation material.

Who is soliciting my proxy?

The Board of Directors is soliciting your proxy in order to provide you with an opportunity to vote on all matters scheduled to come before the meeting whether or not you attend the meeting in person.

What if I received a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials?

We are providing access to our proxy materials over the Internet. Accordingly, on or about January 19, 2018, we are mailing to our record and beneficial stockholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, which contains instructions on how to access our proxy materials over the Internet and vote online. If you received a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, you will not receive a printed copy of our proxy materials by mail unless you request one. If you wish to receive a printed copy of our proxy materials for the 2018 Meeting of Stockholders, you should follow the instructions for requesting those materials included in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials.

Who is entitled to vote?

You may vote if you owned shares of our common stock ("Common Stock") as of the close of business on January 2, 2018, which is the record date. You are entitled to one vote for each share of Common Stock that you own. As of January 2, 2018, we had 218,506,730 shares of Common Stock outstanding.

What shares can I vote?

You may vote all shares owned by you as of the close of business on January 2, 2018, the record date. These shares include:

How do I vote before the meeting?

If you hold your shares in your own name as the stockholder of record, you have three options for voting and submitting your proxy before the meeting:

If you hold your shares through an account with a bank, broker or other nominee, you may view materials at www.edocumentview.com/ABC and may vote by completing and signing the voting instruction form that the bank, broker or other nominee will provide to you, or by using telephone or Internet voting arrangements

4       GRAPHIC


Table of Contents

described on the voting instruction form or other materials that the bank, broker or other nominee will provide to you.

May I vote at the meeting?

You may vote your shares at the meeting if you attend in person. If you hold your shares through an account with a bank or broker, you must obtain a legal proxy from the bank or broker in order to vote at the meeting.

Even if you plan to attend the meeting, we encourage you to vote your shares by proxy. You may vote by proxy over the Internet, by telephone or by mail.

How do I revoke my proxy?

If you are the stockholder of record, you may revoke your proxy at any time before the polls close at the meeting. You may revoke your proxy by:

If you hold your shares through an account with a bank or broker, your ability to revoke your proxy depends on the voting procedures of the bank or broker. Please follow the directions provided to you by your bank or broker.

May I change my vote?

You may change your vote at any time before the polls close at the meeting. You may change your vote by:

If you hold your shares through an account with a bank or broker, your ability to change your vote depends on the voting procedures of the bank or broker. Please follow the directions provided to you by your bank or broker.

What if I return my proxy card but do not provide voting instructions?

Proxy cards that are signed and returned but do not contain instructions will be voted as follows:

GRAPHIC       5


Table of Contents

What does it mean if I receive more than one proxy card or instruction form?

It means that you have multiple accounts with our transfer agent and/or banks or brokers. Please vote all of your shares. We recommend that you consolidate as many accounts as possible under the same name and address. For assistance consolidating accounts where you are the stockholder of record, you may contact our transfer agent, Computershare, at 1-800-522-6645.

Will my shares be voted if I do not provide my proxy?

If you are a registered stockholder and do not provide a proxy, you must attend the meeting in order to vote your shares.

If you hold shares through an account with a bank or broker, your shares may be voted even if you do not provide voting instructions to your bank or broker. Banks and brokers have the authority under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange, or NYSE, to vote shares for which their customers do not provide voting instructions on certain routine matters. The ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm (Item 2 on the Proxy Card) is considered a routine matter for which banks and brokers may vote without specific instructions from their customers.

May stockholders ask questions at the meeting?

Yes. Representatives of AmerisourceBergen will answer stockholders' questions of general interest at the end of the meeting. In order to be eligible to ask questions at the meeting, you must be able to establish that you are a stockholder either as of January 2, 2018 or as of the date of the meeting.

How many votes must be present to hold the meeting?

In order for us to conduct our meeting, a majority of the shares of our Common Stock outstanding as of January 2, 2018 must be present in person or by proxy at the meeting. This is referred to as a quorum. Your shares are counted as present at the meeting if you attend the meeting and vote in person or if you properly return a proxy over the Internet, by telephone or by mail. Shares voted by banks or brokers on behalf of beneficial owners are also counted as present at the meeting. In addition, abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted for purposes of establishing a quorum with respect to any matter properly brought before the meeting. Broker non-votes occur on a matter when a bank or broker is not permitted under applicable rules and regulations to vote on a matter without instruction from the beneficial owner of the underlying shares and no instruction has been given.

How many votes are needed to elect a director and how are votes counted?

The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast will be required for the election of each director (Item 1 on the Proxy Card).

A majority of the votes cast means that the votes cast "for" a director exceed the number of votes cast "against" that director. Abstentions and broker non-votes are disregarded when determining if a majority of the votes have been cast in favor of a director.

How many votes are needed for each proposal to pass and how are the votes counted?

The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote will be required for:

6       GRAPHIC


Table of Contents

Abstentions will be counted toward the tabulation of votes on Items 2 through 8, and will have the effect of negative votes. Under NYSE rules, Item 2 is considered a routine matter on which brokers will be permitted to vote in their discretion even if the beneficial owners do not provide voting instructions. However, Items 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 are not considered routine matters under NYSE rules, and brokers will not be permitted to vote on Items 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 unless the beneficial owners provide voting instructions. Broker non-votes will not be counted toward the tabulation of votes on Items 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8.

How will proxies be voted on other items or matters that properly come before the meeting?

If any other items or matters properly come before the meeting, the proxies received will be voted on those items or matters in accordance with the discretion of the proxy holders.

Is AmerisourceBergen aware of any other item of business that will be presented at the meeting?

We are not aware of any other business to be presented at the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. However, if any other matter should properly come before the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the enclosed proxy confers discretionary authority with respect to such matter.

Will there be any further solicitation of proxies for the meeting?

Our directors, officers and employees may solicit proxies by telephone or in person. In addition, we have hired Morrow & Co., LLC, 470 West Ave, Stamford, CT 06902 to assist us in soliciting proxies, if necessary. Morrow may solicit proxies by telephone or in person. We will pay Morrow a fee of $41,500, plus expenses, for providing such services. All costs and expenses of any solicitation, including the cost of preparing this proxy statement and posting it on the Internet and mailing the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, will be borne by AmerisourceBergen.

Will AmerisourceBergen reimburse any expenses of banks, brokers, nominees and fiduciaries?

Yes, we will reimburse the expenses of banks, brokers, nominees and fiduciaries that send notices, proxies and proxy materials to our stockholders for such service.

Will the directors be in attendance at the meeting?

We currently expect all of our directors to be in attendance at the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. It has been customary for our directors to attend our annual meetings. All of our directors attended the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.


ITEM 1—ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

How often are directors elected?

Directors are elected annually. Any nominee who is elected to serve as a director at our 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders will be elected to serve a term of one year. Similarly, any director who is appointed to fill a vacancy on the Board will serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders after his or her appointment and until his or her successor is elected and qualified.

What is the size of the Board of Directors?

The size of the Board of Directors is ten.

GRAPHIC       7


Table of Contents

Who are this year's nominees?

Ornella Barra, Steven H. Collis, Douglas R. Conant, D. Mark Durcan, Richard W. Gochnauer, Lon R. Greenberg, Jane E. Henney, M.D., Kathleen W. Hyle, Michael J. Long and Henry W. McGee.

Which of this year's nominees are independent?

Mr. Conant, Mr. Durcan, Mr. Gochnauer, Mr. Greenberg, Dr. Henney, Ms. Hyle, Mr. Long and Mr. McGee are independent (as independence is defined in Section 303A of the NYSE Listed Company Manual and in our corporate governance principles).

Are there any family relationships among AmerisourceBergen's directors and executive officers?

No.

What is the term of office for which this year's nominees are to be elected?

The nominees are to be elected for a term of one year and are expected to hold office until the 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until their successors are elected and qualified.

What if a nominee is unwilling or unable to serve?

Each nominee for director has consented to his or her nomination and, so far as the Board of Directors and management are aware, intends to serve a full term as a director if elected. However, if any of the nominees should become unavailable or unable to stand for election prior to the election, the shares represented by proxies may be voted for the election of substitute nominees selected by the Board of Directors.

Why does Walgreens Boots Alliance designate a nominee?

Pursuant to the Shareholders Agreement between AmerisourceBergen and Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. (as successor in interest to Walgreen Co. and Alliance Boots GmbH), Walgreens Boots Alliance has the right to designate a director to our Board once Walgreens Boots Alliance and certain of its subsidiaries collectively own five percent or more of our Common Stock. On May 1, 2014, Walgreens Boots Alliance notified us that they had acquired at least five percent of our Common Stock. Ms. Barra, Co-Chief Operating Officer of Walgreens Boots Alliance, has been designated by Walgreens Boots Alliance to serve on our Board. She was appointed to the Board on January 16, 2015 and is a current nominee for election as director. In addition, upon the acquisition in full by Walgreens Boots Alliance and its subsidiaries of 19,859,795 shares of AmerisourceBergen in the open market, Walgreens Boots Alliance will be entitled to designate a second director to the Board of Directors. For so long as Walgreens Boots Alliance has a right to designate a director to the Board, subject to certain exceptions, including matters related to acquisition proposals, Walgreens Boots Alliance and its subsidiaries will be obligated to vote their shares in accordance with our Board on all matters submitted to a vote of our stockholders. Please refer to "Certain Transactions" on page 56 of this proxy statement and our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 20, 2013 for more detailed information regarding the Shareholders Agreement and related agreements and arrangements.

How does our Governance and Nominating Committee identify and evaluate director nominees?

Our Governance and Nominating Committee seeks director nominees who possess qualifications, experience, attributes and skills that will enable them to contribute meaningfully to the leadership of our Board and to effectively guide and supervise management in driving AmerisourceBergen's growth and financial and operational performance. Each director nominee should:

8       GRAPHIC


Table of Contents

Each nominee should also have sufficient time to effectively carry out his or her duties as a director. Except for the Chief Executive Officer of AmerisourceBergen, who may serve on no more than one other public company board, director nominees may serve on no more than three other public company boards.

In addition, our Governance and Nominating Committee has identified the following expertise, experience, attributes and skills that are particularly relevant to AmerisourceBergen:

We do not have a specific diversity policy, but we seek individuals with diverse backgrounds, skills and expertise to serve on our Board, including women and minorities. We believe that diversity is essential to encourage fresh perspectives, enrich the Board's deliberations and avoid the dominance of a particular individual or group over the Board's decisions. The Governance and Nominating Committee may consider and evaluate director nominees identified by our stockholders as described below in the Section titled "Stockholder Recommendations for Director Nominees."

Below are each nominee's biography and an assessment of the above-mentioned expertise, experience, attributes and skills that the nominee possesses.

GRAPHIC       9


Table of Contents

Biographical information about our nominees

 

ORNELLA BARRA
GRAPHIC

Age: 64
Director since January 2015
Member of our Finance
Committee

 

Principal Occupation, Business Experience and Directorships

Ms. Barra has served on our Board since January 2015 and currently serves as Co-Chief Operating Officer of Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. Previously, she served as Executive Vice President of Walgreens Boots Alliance,  Inc. and President and Chief Executive of Global Wholesale and International Retail from February 2015 until June 2016. Ms. Barra served as Chief Executive, Wholesale and Brands of Alliance Boots GmbH from September 2013 until January 2015 and as Chief Executive of the Pharmaceutical Wholesale Division of Alliance Boots GmbH from January 2009 until September 2013. Prior to her role as Chief Executive of the Pharmaceutical Wholesale Division, Ms. Barra was the Wholesale and Commercial Affairs Director and a Board member of Alliance Boots plc. Prior to the merger of Alliance UniChem Plc and Boots Group plc, Ms. Barra was Executive Director of Alliance UniChem Plc, having been appointed to its Board in 1997 when Alliance Sante merged with UniChem Plc. Ms. Barra has been a member of Board of Directors of Assicurazioni Generali, one of the largest Italian insurance companies, since April 2013 and is an honorary Professor of the University of Nottingham's School of Pharmacy. Ms. Barra was a member of the Board of Directors of Alliance Boots GmbH between June 2007 and February 2015 and was Chairman of its Corporate Social Responsibility Committee from 2009 to 2014. She served as a member of the Board of International Federation of Pharmaceutical Wholesalers, Inc., and has been Chairman, since October 2014. Ms. Barra is a member of the Board of Efficient Consumer Response Europe.

Key Attributes, Expertise, Experience and Skills:

Global Markets: Demonstrated expertise and understanding of global markets by leading and expanding international operations of multinational company.

Healthcare and Distribution Expertise: Heads global wholesale and international retail operations for Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. Acquired extensive experience in pharmaceutical wholesale distribution and pharmaceutical retail industries through long career at Alliance Boots GmbH and predecessor companies, and trained as a pharmacist.

Risk Oversight: Serves as Co-Chief Operating Officer of Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. and as a director of one of the largest insurance companies in Italy.

Sustainability & Corporate Citizenship: Serves as Chair of the Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. Corporate Social Responsibility Committee and served as Chairman of the Corporate Social Responsibility Committee for Alliance Boots GmbH.

     
 

STEVEN H. COLLIS
GRAPHIC

Age: 56
Chairman of the Board since
March 2016
Director since May 2011
Chair of our Executive
Committee

 

Principal Occupation, Business Experience and Directorships

Mr. Collis is the President and Chief Executive Officer of AmerisourceBergen Corporation and has served in this position since July 2011. He has been a member of our Board since 2011 and has served as our Board's Chairman since March 2016. From November 2010 to July 2011, Mr. Collis served as President and Chief Operating Officer of AmerisourceBergen Corporation. He served as Executive Vice President and President of AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation from September 2009 to November 2010, as Executive Vice President and President of AmerisourceBergen Specialty Group from September 2007 to September 2009 and as Senior Vice President of AmerisourceBergen Corporation and President of AmerisourceBergen Specialty Group from August 2001 to September 2007. Mr. Collis has held a variety of other positions with AmerisourceBergen Corporation and its predecessors since 1994. Mr. Collis is a member of the Board of the International Federation of Pharmaceutical Wholesalers, Inc. and CEOs Against Cancer (PA Chapter), and is a member of the American Red Cross Board of Governors. He previously served as a Member of the Board of Thoratec Corporation from 2008 to 2015.

Key Attributes, Expertise, Experience and Skills:

Healthcare and Distribution Expertise: Has held various senior executive leadership positions with AmerisourceBergen Corporation and has extensive business and operating experience in wholesale pharmaceutical distribution and in-depth knowledge of the healthcare distribution and services market.

Global Markets: Leads multinational company that has significantly expanded international operations.

Governance and Risk Oversight: Serves as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer and director of AmerisourceBergen and previously served as director of Thoratec Corporation.

     
 

10       GRAPHIC


Table of Contents

 

DOUGLAS R. CONANT
GRAPHIC

Age: 66
Director since January 2013
Member of our Compensation
and Succession Planning
Committee and our
Governance and Nominating
Committee

 

Principal Occupation, Business Experience and Directorships

Mr. Conant has served on our Board since January 2013. He is the Founder and Chief Executive Officer of Conant Leadership, a firm dedicated to improving the quality of leadership in the 21st century. Mr. Conant served as President and Chief Executive Officer and a member of the Board of Directors of Campbell Soup Company from January 2001 to July 2011. He served as Chairman of the Board of Directors of Avon Products, Inc. from April 2014 to March 2016. Mr. Conant served from 1992 to 2000 at Nabisco Foods Company in a series of senior leadership positions, including President of Nabisco Foods Company from 1995 to 2000. He is also Chairman of CECP, National Organization on Disability, a member of the Board of the Center for Higher Ambition Leadership and Partnership for Public Service. He also serves as trustee for Kellogg Executive Leadership and Hope College.

Key Attributes, Expertise, Experience and Skills:

Executive Leadership: Former Chief Executive Officer and director of Campbell Soup Company and held various senior leadership positions with Nabisco Foods Company.

Global Markets: Has in-depth knowledge of international markets and global distribution operations.

Governance and Risk Oversight: Former Chairman of the Board of Avon Products, Inc.

Talent Management: Brings in-depth knowledge of the development and advancement of leadership skills.

     
 

D. MARK DURCAN
GRAPHIC

Age: 56
Director since September 2015
Member of our Audit
Committee and our Finance
Committee

 

Principal Occupation, Business Experience and Directorships

Mr. Durcan has served on our Board since September 2015. He served as Chief Executive Officer and Director of Micron Technology, Inc. from February 2012 until his retirement in May 2017. Mr. Durcan has served in a variety of roles at Micron Technology, Inc., including as President and Chief Operating Officer from June 2007 to February 2012, as Chief Operating Officer from February 2006 to June 2007, and as Chief Technology Officer from June 1997 to February 2006. Between 1984 and February 2006, Mr. Durcan held various other positions with Micron Technology, Inc. and its subsidiaries and served as an officer from 1996 through his retirement. Mr. Durcan served as a director of MWI Veterinary Supply, Inc. from March 2014 until its acquisition by AmerisourceBergen in February 2015. He served as a director at Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. from 2014 through 2015 and has served as a Director of St. Luke's Health System of Idaho since February 2017. Mr. Durcan has also served on the Semiconductor Industry Association Board and the Technology CEO Council.

Key Attributes, Expertise, Experience and Skills:

Financial Expertise: Brings substantial experience in the area of finance, executive leadership and strategic planning in his former roles as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer of Micron Technology, Inc.

Global Markets: Contributes deep understanding of global markets and extensive experience in managing global manufacturing, procurement, supply chain and quality control for a multinational corporation and, as former member of the board of MWI Veterinary Supply, Inc., has important insights into wholesale distribution of animal health products.

Information Technology: Has unique and in-depth knowledge of technology and capability to drive technological innovation.

     
 

GRAPHIC       11


Table of Contents

 

RICHARD W. GOCHNAUER
GRAPHIC

Age: 68
Director since September 2008
Chair of our Finance Committee
and member of our Executive
Committee and Governance
and Nominating Committee

 

Principal Occupation, Business Experience and Directorships

Mr. Gochnauer has served on our Board since September 2008. He served as Chief Executive Officer of United Stationers Inc. from December 2002 until his retirement in May 2011 and as Chief Operating Officer of United Stationers Inc. from July 2002 to December 2002. Mr. Gochnauer served as Vice Chairman and President, International, and President and Chief Operating Officer of Golden State Foods Corporation from 1994 to 2002. He currently serves as a member of the Boards of UGI Corporation, Golden State Foods Corporation and Rush University Medical Center and previously served as a director of Fieldstone Communities, Inc. from 2000 to 2008 and United Stationers Inc. from July 2002 to May 2011. Mr. Gochnauer is also a member of the Boards of Opportunity International and the Center for Higher Ambition Leadership.

Key Attributes, Expertise, Experience and Skills:

Distribution and Logistics: Provides strategic direction and valuable perspective on measures to drive operating growth and compete effectively in the distribution business gained through his management of diverse distribution businesses.

Governance Experience: Serves as director of UGI Corporation and Golden State Foods Corporation and held senior executive leadership roles at United Stationers Inc. and Golden State Foods Corporation.

Risk Oversight: Extensive experience overseeing the management of risk on an enterprise-wide basis.

     
 

LON R. GREENBERG
GRAPHIC

Age: 67
Director since May 2013
Chair of our Audit Committee
and member of our Executive
Committee and Finance Committee

 

Principal Occupation, Business Experience and Directorships

Mr. Greenberg has served on our Board since May 2013. He served as Chairman of UGI Corporation's Board of Directors from 1996 until January 2016 and as director of UGI Utilities, Inc. and AmeriGas Propane, both UGI Corporation subsidiaries. Mr. Greenberg served as Chief Executive Officer of UGI Corporation from 1995 until his retirement in April 2013. Mr. Greenberg served in various leadership positions throughout his tenure with UGI Corporation. He is a member of the Board of Ameriprise Financial, Inc. and is a member of the Board of Directors of the United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey. Mr. Greenberg served as Chairman of the Board of Directors of Temple University Health System and is a member of the Board of Trustees of Temple University, the Board of Directors of Fox Chase Cancer Center and the Board of The Philadelphia Foundation. Mr. Greenberg previously served as a member of the Board of Aqua America,  Inc.

Key Attributes, Expertise, Experience and Skills:

Financial Expertise: Brings financial literacy and sophistication acquired through various executive, legal and corporate roles, as well as membership on other NYSE listed companies.

Global Markets: Has valuable business and executive management experience in distribution and global operations acquired as Chief Executive Officer of UGI Corporation.

Healthcare Expertise: Contributes experience and knowledge of the healthcare industry from his perspective as a director of healthcare organizations.

Governance and Regulatory Experience: Served as Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of UGI Corporation, as a director of subsidiaries of UGI Corporation, and as a director of Aqua America, Inc. Mr. Greenberg also currently serves as a director of Ameriprise Financial, Inc.

     
 

12       GRAPHIC


Table of Contents

 

JANE E. HENNEY, M.D.
GRAPHIC

Age: 70
Lead Independent Director
since March 2016
Director since January 2002
Serves ex officio on each of
the Board's committees

 

Principal Occupation, Business Experience and Directorships

Dr. Henney has served as our Board's Lead Independent Director since March 2016 and as a Director since January 2002. She has served as Home Secretary for the National Academy of Medicine since April 1, 2014. Dr. Henney was a Professor of Medicine at the College of Medicine at the University of Cincinnati from January 2008 until December 2012. She served as Senior Vice President and Provost for Health Affairs at the University of Cincinnati from July 2003 to January 2008 and was the Commissioner of Food and Drugs at the United States Food and Drug Administration from 1998 to 2001. Dr. Henney served as Vice President for Health Sciences at the University of New Mexico from 1994 to 1998. She currently serves as a director for CIGNA Corporation and The China Medical Board. Dr. Henney previously served as a director of AstraZeneca PLC from September 2001 to April 2011 and Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc. from March 2012 to January 2014. Dr. Henney is a National Association of Corporate Directors (NACD) Board Leadership Fellow. Dr. Henney is a former member of the Board of The Commonwealth Fund and The Monnell Center for the Chemical Senses.

Key Attributes, Expertise, Experience and Skills:

Governance and Risk Oversight: Serves as director of Cigna Corporation, was a former director of AstraZeneca PLC and Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and is a NACD Board Leadership Fellow.

Healthcare Expertise: Provides in-depth knowledge and industry-specific perspective acquired through her experience as a medical oncologist, prominent government and academic posts, and tenure as director of pharmaceutical and insurance companies.

Regulatory: As a former Commissioner of Food and Drugs for the United States Food and Drug Administration, Dr. Henney has extensive insight into federal regulatory matters.

     
 

KATHLEEN W. HYLE
GRAPHIC

Age: 59
Director since May 2010
Member of our Audit
Committee and
Compensation and
Succession Planning
Committee

 

Principal Occupation, Business Experience and Directorships

Ms. Hyle has served on our Board since May 2010. She served as Senior Vice President of Constellation Energy and Chief Operating Officer of Constellation Energy Resources from November 2008 until March 2012. Ms. Hyle served as Chief Financial Officer for Constellation Energy Nuclear Group and for UniStar Nuclear Energy, LLC from June 2007 to November 2008. Prior to joining Constellation Energy in 2003, Ms. Hyle served as the Chief Financial Officer of ANC Rental Corp., Vice President and Treasurer of Auto-Nation, Inc., and Vice President and Treasurer of Black & Decker Corporation. She is a member of the Board of Bunge Limited and of the Board of Trustees of Center Stage in Baltimore, MD. Ms. Hyle is a Partner in WKW LLC, a limited liability company and is a former member of the Board of Sponsors for the Loyola University Maryland Sellinger School of Business and Management.

Key Attributes, Expertise, Experience and Skills:

Financial Expertise: Provides critical insight into, among other things, financial statements, accounting principles and practices, internal control over financial reporting and risk management processes.

Governance and Risk Oversight: Current director of Bunge Limited and former director of The ADT Corporation.

Risk Management: Held senior management positions at Constellation Energy, ANC Rental Corp., and Black & Decker Corporation and brings extensive experience in management, operations and regulatory compliance.

     
 

GRAPHIC       13


Table of Contents

 

MICHAEL J. LONG
GRAPHIC

Age: 59
Director since May 2006
Chair of our Compensation and
Succession Planning
Committee and member of
our Audit Committee
and Executive Committee

 

Principal Occupation, Business Experience and Directorships

Mr. Long has served on our Board since May 2006. He has served as the Chief Executive Officer of Arrow Electronics, Inc. since May 2009 and as Chairman of the Board since 2010. Previously, he served as President and Chief Operating Officer of Arrow Electronics, Inc. from February 2008 until May 2009 and as a Senior Vice President of Arrow Electronics, Inc. from January 2006 to February 2008. He is a member of the Board of Trustees of the Denver Zoo.

Key Attributes, Expertise, Experience and Skills:

Financial Expertise: Brings relevant experience in the areas of finance, operations, management, leadership, strategic planning, executive compensation and global competition drawn from his current and prior leadership positions at Arrow Electronics, Inc.

Global Markets and Distribution Expertise: Contributes critical insight into international markets and has an in-depth knowledge of business and strategic opportunities for wholesale distribution.

Governance and Risk Oversight: Serves as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Arrow Electronics, Inc.

Information Technology: Familiarity with technology solutions and IT services through experience in electronic components industry.

     
 

HENRY W. MCGEE
GRAPHIC

Age: 64
Director since November 2004
Chair of our Governance
and Nominating Committee
and member of our
Compensation and
Succession Planning
Committee and
Executive Committee

 

Principal Occupation, Business Experience and Directorships

Mr. McGee has served on our Board since November 2004. He is a Senior Lecturer at Harvard Business School, a position he has held since July 2013. From April 2013 to August 2013, Mr. McGee served as a Consultant at HBO Home Entertainment. Previously, Mr. McGee served as President of HBO Home Entertainment from 1995 until his retirement in March 2013. He served as Senior Vice President, Programming, HBO Video, from 1988 to 1995 and prior to that, Mr. McGee served in leadership positions in various divisions of HBO. Mr. McGee is the former President of the Alvin Ailey Dance Theater Foundation and the Film Society of Lincoln Center. He has served on the Boards of the Sundance Institute, the Public Theater, Save the Children and the Time Warner Foundation and is currently a member of the Board of Tegna Inc., the Pew Research Center and the Black Filmmaker Foundation. Mr. McGee was recognized by Savoy Magazine in 2016 and 2017 as a member of the Power 300 list of the Most Influential Black Corporate Directors.

Key Attributes, Expertise, Experience and Skills:

Global Markets and Distribution Expertise: Contributes significant operational, marketing and wholesale distribution expertise and knowledge of international markets acquired in senior management and leadership roles during his long career with HBO.

Information Technology: Has a deep understanding of the uses of technology and application to marketing and media.

Governance and Risk Oversight: Current director of Tegna Inc. and Pew Research Center. Teaches courses on leadership and corporate accountability. Served as President of HBO Home Entertainment and in other leadership positions within HBO.

     
 

How does the Board of Directors recommend that I vote?

We recommend that you vote For the election of each of the ten nominees named in this proxy statement to the Board of Directors.

14       GRAPHIC


Table of Contents


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE DIRECTORS, THE BOARD
AND THE BOARD COMMITTEES

Identified below are the members of the current Board committees, the number of meetings that each committee held in fiscal year 2017 and the responsibilities of each committee:

    Name


    Board
    Executive
    Audit
    Compensation and
Succession Planning


    Finance
    Governance and
Nominating

Ornella Barra

                                      X        

Steven H. Collis

    CHAIR     CHAIR                
                       

Douglas R. Conant

                              X               X

D. Mark Durcan

            X         X    
                       

Richard W. Gochnauer

              X                       CHAIR       X

Lon R. Greenberg

        X     CHAIR         X    
                       

Jane E. Henney, M.D.(1)

              X                                

Kathleen W. Hyle

            X     X        
                       

Michael J. Long

              X       X       CHAIR                

Henry W. McGee

        X         X         CHAIR
                       

Number of Meetings in Fiscal Year 2017

      8       0       9       4       7       4
(1)
Dr. Henney, as our Lead Independent Director, serves ex officio on each of the Board's committees.

Summary of Duties and Responsibilities of the Board Committees

Audit Committee

GRAPHIC       15


Table of Contents

Compensation and Succession Planning Committee

Executive Committee

Finance Committee

Governance and Nominating Committee

16       GRAPHIC


Table of Contents

Did each director attend at least 75% of the aggregate of (i) the total number of meetings of the Board of Directors held during fiscal 2017 and (ii) the total number of meetings held by each committee of the Board on which such person served during fiscal 2017?

Yes, except for Ms. Barra, who attended 67% of the aggregate of the total number of meetings of the Board of Directors and the total number of meetings held by committees on which she served.

Do the independent directors meet regularly?

The independent directors meet prior to the commencement of each of the regularly scheduled Committee meetings. Additionally, the independent directors, together with our one additional non-management director, meet following each regularly scheduled meeting of the full Board of Directors. The Lead Independent Director presides at such meetings and, if the Lead Independent Director is not present, the committee Chairs preside on a rotating basis.

How do interested parties make their concerns known to the non-management directors?

Interested parties who wish to make any concerns known to the non-management directors may submit communications at any time in writing to: Hyung J. Bak, Secretary, AmerisourceBergen Corporation, 1300 Morris Drive, Chesterbrook, PA 19087. AmerisourceBergen's Secretary will determine, in his good faith judgment, which communications will be relayed to the Lead Independent Director and other non-management directors.

How are directors compensated?

The following table summarizes the total compensation earned by directors who were not employees of AmerisourceBergen during fiscal year 2017. Ms. Barra waived her right to receive compensation as a non-employee director. Directors who are employees of AmerisourceBergen receive no compensation for their service as directors or as members of Board committees.

GRAPHIC       17


Table of Contents


Non-Employee Director Compensation at 2017 Fiscal Year End

    Name


  Retainer/
Fees
Earned or
Paid in
Cash
(1)






  Stock
Awards
(2)



  Option
Awards
(3)



  All Other
Compensation
(4)



  Total    

Ornella Barra(5)

         

Douglas R. Conant

$ 100,000 $ 125,038 $ 6,763 $ 231,801

D. Mark Durcan

  $ 100,000   $ 125,038       $ 225,038

Richard W. Gochnauer

$ 110,000 $ 125,038 $ 235,038

Lon R. Greenberg

  $ 110,000   $ 125,038     $ 6,763   $ 241,801

Jane E. Henney, M.D.

$ 130,000 $ 149,954 $ 6,763 $ 286,717

Kathleen W. Hyle

  $ 110,000   $ 125,038     $ 6,763   $ 241,801

Michael J. Long

$ 115,072 $ 125,038 $ 6,763 $ 246,873

Henry W. McGee

  $ 105,000   $ 125,038     $ 17,933   $ 247,971
(1)
These amounts include amounts earned for service as Committee Chairs and amounts deferred into our deferred compensation plan. In fiscal year 2017, Mr. Long received 1,395 shares of Common Stock, in lieu of the retainer.

(2)
As of September 30, 2017, each of the non-employee directors held the following shares of outstanding restricted stock units: Ms. Barra—0; Mr. Conant—3,983; Mr. Durcan—2,777; Mr. Gochnauer—5,801; Mr. Greenberg—3,983; Dr. Henney—4,537; Ms. Hyle—3,983; Mr. Long—3,983; and Mr. McGee—5,801.
(3)
No stock options were granted to directors in fiscal year 2017. As of September 30, 2017, each of the non-employee directors held outstanding stock options as follows: Ms. Barra—0; Mr. Conant—0; Mr. Durcan—0; Mr. Gochnauer—52,541; Mr. Greenberg—0; Dr. Henney—3,528; Ms. Hyle—19,932; Mr. Long—0; and Mr. McGee—10,585.

(4)
These amounts represent the dividends accrued and paid on restricted stock and restricted stock units that vested in fiscal year 2017. In addition, the amount shown for Mr. McGee also includes the value of prescription drug benefits provided to Mr. McGee and his spouse during fiscal year 2017.

(5)
Ms. Barra waived her right to receive compensation as a non-employee director. Consequently, our Board has waived the stock ownership requirements for Ms. Barra.

Director Fees.    Our director compensation program provides for an annual cash retainer plus an annual equity award of restricted stock units. Consistent with our overall compensation philosophy, the compensation program for non-employee directors provides total direct compensation (cash retainer and equity award) in the 50th percentile of our peer group. (See page 34 for a description of our peer group.)


Compensation Element










2018 Compensation Program



Annual Retainer

      $100,000 Non-Employee Director
$125,000 Lead Independent Director

Annual Equity Award

    $125,000 Non-Employee Director
$150,000 Lead Independent Director
   

Chair Fee

      $20,000 Audit Committee
$15,000 Compensation and Succession Planning Committee
$10,000 Finance Committee
$10,000 Governance and Nominating Committee

18       GRAPHIC


Table of Contents

Annual Retainers.    A director may elect to have the annual retainer paid in cash, Common Stock or restricted stock units or credited to a deferred compensation account. Payment of annual retainers in cash will be made in equal quarterly installments in advance.

Annual Equity Awards.    On March 2, 2017, each of the non-employee directors (other than Ms. Barra, who waived compensation) received an annual grant of restricted stock units. The vesting period for these awards is three years from the date of grant, subject to continued service on the Board or following retirement by a director (i) aged 62 with five years of continuous service on the Board or (ii) who, after reaching age 55, has an age plus years of continuous employment with the Company that equals at least 70. These grants were made under the AmerisourceBergen Corporation Omnibus Incentive Plan (the "Omnibus Incentive Plan"). A director may defer settlement of shares payable with respect to restricted stock units as described below.

Deferral and Other Arrangements.    Directors have the option to defer all or any part of the annual retainer and to credit the deferred amount to an account under the AmerisourceBergen Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan. Payment of deferred amounts will be made or begin on the first day of the month after the non-employee director ceases to serve as a director. A director may elect to receive the deferred benefit (i) over annual periods ranging from three to fifteen years and payable in quarterly installments or (ii) in a single distribution. We pay all costs and expenses incurred in the administration of the Deferred Compensation Plan. Directors also have the option to forgo 50% or more of their annual cash retainers and receive either Common Stock or restricted stock units covering shares having a fair market value on the quarterly grant date equal to the amount of the foregone compensation. In addition, directors may defer settlement of any shares payable with respect to any restricted stock units (and any dividend equivalents) received either in lieu of the annual retainer or as the annual equity award to a later date. We also provide our directors with a prescription drug benefit and reimburse them for the cost of education programs, transportation, food and lodging in connection with their service as directors.

Stock Ownership Guidelines.    We require our non-employee directors to own shares of our Common Stock to align their interests with those of the stockholders and to provide an incentive to foster our long-term success. From and after the fifth year following their Board election, non-employee directors must own stock equal in value to at least five times the annual cash retainer. We may take unusual market conditions into consideration when assessing compliance.


CODES OF ETHICS

Has AmerisourceBergen adopted a code of ethics and business conduct that applies to directors, officers and employees?

The Board of Directors adopted our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct in May 2004. We review and revise the Code of Ethics and Business Conduct from time to time, most recently in March 2017. It applies to directors and employees, including officers, and is intended to comply with the requirements of Section 303A.10 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual.

Any waivers of the application of the Code of Ethics and Business Conduct to directors or executive officers must be approved by either the Board of Directors or the Audit Committee. We will disclose any such waiver or amendment of the Code of Ethics and Business Conduct promptly on our website at investor.amerisourcebergen.com.

Has AmerisourceBergen adopted a code of ethics for the principal executive officer and principal financial and accounting officers of AmerisourceBergen as required by SEC regulations?

We have adopted our Code of Ethics for Designated Senior Officers in accordance with Item 406 of the SEC's Regulation S-K. It applies to our President and Chief Executive Officer, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President and Corporate Controller. Any waiver or amendment of the Code of Ethics for Designated Senior Officers will be disclosed promptly on our website at investor.amerisourcebergen.com.

GRAPHIC       19


Table of Contents

Where can stockholders obtain copies of the codes of ethics?

Our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct and our Code of Ethics for Designated Senior Officers are posted on our website at investor.amerisourcebergen.com.


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

What is our leadership structure?

In March 2016, the Board determined that naming Steven H. Collis as Chairman of the Board and naming Dr. Jane E. Henney as Lead Independent Director is the governance structure best suited to enable our Board and management to carry out their responsibilities to our stockholders and promote the growth of AmerisourceBergen.

Accordingly, our employees conduct our business under the direction of our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer and with the independent oversight of our Board. To enhance its oversight function, our Board is composed of directors who are not employed by us, with the exception of Mr. Collis.

Our Board provides guidance and critical review of our governance, strategic initiatives, talent management and risk management processes. Our Board ensures that we have an effective management team in place to run our business and serves to protect and advance the long-term interests of our stockholders. The role of our senior executives is to develop and implement a strategic business plan for AmerisourceBergen and to grow our business.

Why have we named Mr. Collis as Chairman and Dr. Henney as Lead Independent Director?

We believe that our leadership structure is in the best interests of AmerisourceBergen and its stockholders and that it fosters innovative, responsive and strong leadership for the Company as a whole. Our Board determined that the election of an executive Chairman must be accompanied by the election of a strong Lead Independent Director with a clearly defined and dynamic leadership role in the governance of the Board. We believe the structure promotes, through the clearly articulated roles and responsibilities of the Lead Independent Director and Board committees, the objective and effective oversight of management.

Serving as both Chairman and Chief Executive Officer enables Mr. Collis to effectively and efficiently execute our strategic initiatives, and to respond to challenges and changes in both U.S. and international markets. In addition to her extensive knowledge of the healthcare industry and regulatory environment, Dr. Henney has a thorough understanding of the Board's oversight role and leading corporate governance practices. As Lead Independent Director, Dr. Henney provides assertive, independent leadership in the boardroom.

What are the responsibilities of the Chairman and the Lead Independent Director?

The Chairman's primary responsibility is to set the agenda for the Board and to facilitate communications among our directors and between the Board and senior management. As Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Collis ensures that the Board's agenda and discussions address strategic planning as well as key business issues and risks that he encounters in daily operations.

Our governance structure establishes a dynamic leadership role for the Lead Independent Director, which, together with independent Committee leadership, provides a meaningful counterbalance to the executive Chairman and maintains independent and effective oversight of management.

Key aspects of this structure include: if the Chairman is not an independent member of the Board, a majority of the independent directors shall elect a Lead Independent Director annually, subject to his or her continuing reelection and status as an independent director; the Lead Independent Director has clearly articulated and extensive authority and responsibilities in the Board's governance and functions; our Audit Committee, the Compensation and Succession Planning Committee and the Governance and Nominating Committee are each chaired by and comprised solely of independent directors; and our non-employee directors are encouraged to, and often do, have direct contact with our senior managers outside the presence of our executive officers.

20       GRAPHIC


Table of Contents

The Lead Independent Director's authority is as follows:

Our Board conducts annual evaluations, under the oversight of our Governance and Nominating Committee. The Compensation and Succession Planning Committee, in accordance with its charter and under the oversight of the Lead Independent Director, will annually review the performance of, and succession plan for, the Chief Executive Officer. These processes provide our Board with opportunities to examine and reassess the effectiveness of our leadership structure, including the performance of our Chairman and Lead Independent Director.

Has AmerisourceBergen adopted corporate governance principles for the Board of Directors?

Our Board has adopted our corporate governance principles. Together with the charters of the Board committees, they provide the framework for the governance of AmerisourceBergen. Our corporate governance principles clearly delineate the authority and roles of the Chairman of the Board and the Lead Independent Director in the leadership of the Board, mandate the independence of the committee Chairs and all the members of our audit, compensation and governance committees, and affirm non-employee directors' access to managers and associates outside the presence of our executives. The corporate governance principles address a variety of governance issues in addition to the leadership structure, including those discussed under the headings "Election of Directors," "Additional Information about the Directors, the Board and the Board Committees," "Codes of Ethics" and "Stockholder Engagement." The Board reviews and updates the corporate governance principles and the committee charters from time to time to reflect leading corporate governance practices.

What are the standing Committees of the Board?

There are five standing committees of the Board: the Audit Committee, the Compensation and Succession Planning Committee, the Executive Committee, the Finance Committee and the Governance and Nominating Committee. The Board committees, with the exception of the Executive Committee and the Finance Committee, are required to be composed entirely of independent directors. Our Executive Committee, which is composed of our Chairman of the Board, the Lead Independent Director and the Chairs of the other standing committees, has the authority to act between regularly scheduled meetings of the Board, subject to applicable law. The

GRAPHIC       21


Table of Contents

Chairman of the Board serves as the Chair of the Executive Committee. The Board believes that changing committee assignments from time to time strengthens our corporate governance practices and enhances each committee's objective review of management.

Where can stockholders find our corporate governance documents?

Our corporate governance principles and the charters of the Audit Committee, the Compensation and Succession Planning Committee, the Finance Committee and the Governance and Nominating Committee have been posted on our website at investor.amerisourcebergen.com.

Has the Board determined which of the directors are independent?

The Board has determined that, except for Ms. Barra and Mr. Collis, all of the directors are independent. Our corporate governance principles require us to maintain a minimum of 70% independent directors on our Board. If the ten director nominees are elected at the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, eight out of ten directors then serving will be independent.

The Board has adopted guidelines in our corporate governance principles to assist it in making independence determinations, which meet or exceed the independence requirements set forth in the NYSE listing standards. These guidelines are contained in Section 5 of our corporate governance principles. For a director to be considered independent, the Board must determine that the director does not have any direct or indirect material relationship with AmerisourceBergen.

With the assistance of legal counsel, our Board reviewed the applicable legal standards for director and Board committee member independence. In undertaking its review, the Board considered that some of our directors serve on the board of directors or as executive officers of companies for which we perform (or may seek to perform) drug distribution and other services in the ordinary course of business. As a result of this review, the Board has determined that each of the following directors is independent: Douglas R. Conant, D. Mark Durcan, Richard W. Gochnauer, Lon R. Greenberg, Jane E. Henney, M.D., Kathleen W. Hyle, Michael J. Long and Henry W. McGee.

Our Board has also determined that each of the members of our Audit Committee, Compensation and Succession Planning Committee and Governance and Nominating Committee are independent, in accordance with the independence requirements set forth in their charters and, as applicable, SEC rules and NYSE listing standards. None of the members of these committees receives any consulting or advisory fee from us other than compensation as non-employee directors.

How does the Board oversee our risk management process?

The Board executes its oversight responsibility for risk management directly and through its committees, as follows:

22       GRAPHIC


Table of Contents

Has management conducted a risk assessment of AmerisourceBergen's employee compensation policies and practices?

We have conducted an internal risk assessment of our employee compensation policies and practices, including those relating to our executives. We have concluded that our compensation policies and practices do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on AmerisourceBergen. We have reviewed our risk analysis with the Compensation and Succession Planning Committee. The risk assessment process included, among other things, a review of all key incentive compensation plans to ensure that they are aligned with our pay-for-performance philosophy and include performance metrics that support corporate goals. The objective of the process was to identify any compensation plans and practices that may encourage employees to take unnecessary risks that could threaten the Company. No such plans or practices were identified. Moreover, various factors mitigate the risk profile of our compensation programs, including, among others:

GRAPHIC       23


Table of Contents

What orientation and educational opportunities does AmerisourceBergen provide for our directors?

We provide our directors with comprehensive orientation and continuing education, which is overseen by the Governance and Nominating Committee. Director orientation familiarizes the directors with our business and strategic plans, significant financial, accounting and risk management issues, compliance programs and other controls, policies, principal officers and internal auditors, and our independent registered public accounting firm. The orientation also addresses Board procedures, our corporate governance principles and our Board committee charters. We offer continuing education programs and provide opportunities to attend commercial director education seminars to assist our directors in maintaining their expertise in areas related to the work of the Board and the directors' committee assignments. For example, some of our directors have completed executive education programs for directors as part of their continuing education. We provide our directors with full membership to the National Association of Corporate Directors to provide a forum for them to maintain their insight into leading governance practices and exchange ideas with peers. Dr. Henney in 2011 and 2012 and Ms. Hyle in 2015 were named to the "NACD Directorship 100," an annual honor sponsored by the National Association of Corporate Directors to recognize influential directors and others who impact corporate governance.

How is the Board's performance evaluated?

We have a comprehensive annual evaluation policy and process in place for the Board and each of its committees, which is led by the Chair of our Governance and Nominating Committee and by our Lead Independent Director. As required by our corporate governance principles, the evaluation occurs annually in advance of the Board's November meeting. Either the Chair of our Governance and Nominating Committee, the Lead Independent Director, or an independent, third-party governance expert interviews each director to obtain his or her assessment of the effectiveness of the Board and the Committees on which he or she serves, as well as director performance and Board dynamics. In 2017, the interview process was led by the Lead Independent Director. In advance of the interview, each member of a committee receives a questionnaire soliciting feedback regarding the committee's performance. During the interview, each member is asked to provide an assessment of the Board's and the relevant committee's performance. We also solicit suggestions for improving the Board's and the committee's performance, dynamics, time-management, and functioning, as well as proposed topics of focus for the Board and the committee in the upcoming year. The results of the individual interviews and assessments are aggregated in a report, which the Lead Independent Director presents to the full Board for review, discussion and determination of action items. The annual review in November by the Board of the corporate governance principles and by each committee of its charter is a further step in the evaluation process through which the directors consider leading corporate governance practices for the Board as a whole and identify new areas of focus for the different committees. The full Board reviews and discusses recommended revisions to the corporate governance principles and committee charters prior to voting on their approval.

24       GRAPHIC


Table of Contents

Do we have a majority vote standard for director elections and a director resignation policy?

Our bylaws and corporate governance principles provide for a majority vote standard for the election of directors. Under the majority vote standard, each director must be elected by a majority of the votes cast by the shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote. A "majority of the votes cast" means that the number of votes cast "for" a candidate for director must exceed the number of votes cast "against" that director. A plurality voting standard will apply instead of a majority voting standard if:

Under Delaware law, if an incumbent nominee for director in an uncontested election does not receive the required votes for re-election, the director remains in office until a successor is elected and qualified. Our bylaws and corporate governance principles require each director nominee to tender an irrevocable resignation prior to the applicable meeting of stockholders and include post-election procedures in the event an incumbent director does not receive the required votes for re-election, as follows:


STOCKHOLDER ENGAGEMENT

What efforts has AmerisourceBergen made to engage with stockholders?

We value open communications with our stockholders. The goal of our engagement and outreach efforts is to ensure that we work collaboratively to educate our investors about our business and governance practices as well as to identify issues of importance to our stockholders and our business. Our investor relations team regularly shares with our Board and senior executives the feedback that they have received from our stockholders.

On an ongoing basis, we proactively communicate with the investment community and stockholders about AmerisourceBergen's financial performance, operations and strategic developments through the following:

Specifically, in 2017 we communicated with our largest stockholders in order to seek their input on a variety of topics.

Our corporate governance principles, which were revised in November 2017, describe the procedures through which stockholders may seek direct engagement with Board members. While management, through our President and Chief Executive Officer and our investor relations team, ordinarily engages with stockholders, the Chairman of the Board, in consultation with the Lead Independent Director, will review and consider, on a case-by-case basis, stockholder requests for meetings with the Board of Directors related to key areas of Board

GRAPHIC       25


Table of Contents

oversight and determine whether such meetings would be appropriate and beneficial. Stockholders may communicate their views directly to the Board by writing to Hyung J. Bak, Secretary, AmerisourceBergen Corporation, 1300 Morris Drive, Chesterbrook, Pennsylvania 19087.


STOCKHOLDER RECOMMENDATIONS FOR DIRECTOR NOMINEES

What process should a stockholder follow to propose nominees for consideration by the Governance and Nominating Committee?

The advance notice provision for nomination of directors in our bylaws allows a stockholder to propose nominees for consideration by the Governance and Nominating Committee by submitting specified information concerning itself and the proposed nominee, including the name, appropriate biographical information and qualifications of the proposed nominee. This and other information required under the advance notice provision must be provided to us in writing to: Hyung J. Bak, Secretary, AmerisourceBergen Corporation, 1300 Morris Drive, Chesterbrook, Pennsylvania 19087, no earlier than November 1, 2018 and no later than December 1, 2018 to be considered for the 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

The proxy access provision in our bylaws allows an eligible stockholder or group of no more than 20 eligible stockholders that has maintained continuous ownership of 3% or more of our Common Stock for at least three years to include in our proxy materials for an annual meeting of stockholders a number of director nominees up to the greater of two or 20% of the directors then in office. Loaned stock that can be recalled within three days may count towards an eligible stockholder's 3% beneficial ownership requirement, which must be maintained at least until the annual meeting at which the proponent's nominee will be considered. Proxy access nominees who do not receive at least a 25% vote in favor of election will be ineligible as a nominee for the following two years. Provisions in the Shareholders Agreement with Walgreens Boots Alliance would not permit Walgreens Boots Alliance to use proxy access. If any stockholder proposes a director nominee under our advance notice provision, we are not required to include any proxy access nominee in our proxy statement for the annual meeting. Information required under the proxy access provision must be provided to us in writing to: Hyung J. Bak, Secretary, AmerisourceBergen Corporation, 1300 Morris Drive, Chesterbrook, Pennsylvania 19087, no earlier than August 22, 2018 and no later than September 21, 2018 to be considered for the 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. In considering any nominee proposed by a stockholder in accordance with the requirements set forth in our bylaws, the Governance and Nominating Committee will reach a conclusion based on the nominee evaluation criteria described above. After full consideration, the stockholder proponent will be notified of the decision of the committee.


AUDIT MATTERS

Audit Committee Financial Experts

The Board of Directors has determined that each of Mr. Greenberg, Mr. Durcan and Ms. Hyle is an "audit committee financial expert" as defined in Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K. Mr. Greenberg serves as Chair of the Audit Committee. A description of the financial expertise of Mr. Greenberg, Mr. Durcan and Ms. Hyle accompanies their biographies on pages 12, 11 and 13, respectively.

Report of the Audit Committee

The Audit Committee consists of the four directors named at the end of this report. All of the Audit Committee members are independent under SEC and NYSE rules and our corporate governance principles. The Board of Directors has concluded that each member is financially literate and that three of the members qualify as an audit committee financial expert. The key responsibilities of the Audit Committee are set forth in its charter, which was most recently revised by the Board of Directors in November 2017. The charter is available on our website at investor.amerisourcebergen.com.

AmerisourceBergen's management has the primary responsibility for the Company's financial statements and its internal control over financial reporting. AmerisourceBergen's independent registered public accounting firm, Ernst & Young LLP (EY), is responsible for performing an independent audit of AmerisourceBergen's consolidated financial statements and for issuing a report on the effectiveness of AmerisourceBergen's internal

26       GRAPHIC


Table of Contents

control over financial reporting. AmerisourceBergen's management has represented to the Audit Committee that the financial statements contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2017 were prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of September 30, 2017.

The Audit Committee reviewed and discussed with AmerisourceBergen's management and EY the audited financial statements contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017 and our internal control over financial reporting. The Audit Committee discussed with EY, which is responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of the audited financial statements with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, the firm's judgments as to the quality, not just the acceptability, of the Company's accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments reflected in the financial statements and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements. The Audit Committee also discussed with EY the matters related to the conduct of the audit that are required to be discussed with the Audit Committee under the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB), including the matters required to be discussed by the PCAOB Auditing Standard No. 1301, "Communication with Audit Committees." In addition, the Audit Committee discussed with Ernst & Young LLP the firm's independence from the Company and its management, including the matters in the written disclosures and letter that were received by the Audit Committee from EY as required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding EY's communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence. The Audit Committee also discussed with EY the firm's audit of the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2017.

Based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in AmerisourceBergen's Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2017.

  AUDIT COMMITTEE

 

Lon R. Greenberg, Chair
D. Mark Durcan
Kathleen W. Hyle
Michael J. Long

Policy for Pre-Approval of Audit and Non-Audit Services

The Audit Committee's policy is to pre-approve all audit services and all non-audit services that the Company's independent registered public accounting firm is permitted to perform for the Company under applicable federal securities regulations. As permitted by the applicable regulations, the committee's policy utilizes a combination of specific pre-approval on a case-by-case basis of individual engagements of the independent registered public accounting firm and general pre-approval of certain categories of engagements up to predetermined dollar thresholds that are reviewed annually by the committee. Specific pre-approval is mandatory for the annual financial statement audit engagement, among others.

GRAPHIC       27


Table of Contents

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm's Fees

During the fiscal years ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, Ernst & Young LLP, AmerisourceBergen's independent registered public accounting firm, billed the Company the fees set forth below in connection with services rendered by the independent registered public accounting firm to the Company:

    Fee Category








Fiscal Year 2017








Fiscal Year 2016

Audit Fees

  $ 6,760,000   $ 6,799,000

Audit-Related Fees

227,000 307,000

Tax Fees

  1,502,000   1,881,000

All Other Fees

2,000 2,000

TOTAL

  $ 8,491,000   $ 8,989,000

Audit fees consisted of fees for the audit of AmerisourceBergen's annual financial statements, consultation concerning financial accounting and reporting standards and consultation concerning matters relating to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, reviews of quarterly financial statements as well as services normally provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements, comfort letters, consents and assistance with and review of Company documents filed with the SEC. Audit fees also included fees for the audit of the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Audit-related fees consisted of fees for assurance and related services, including employee benefit plan audits.

Tax fees consisted of fees for services related to tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning services.

Other fees consisted of subscription fees for Internet-based professional literature.

Our Audit Committee reviewed and approved all fees charged by Ernst & Young LLP in accordance with the policy described above and monitored the relationship between audit and permissible non-audit services provided. The policy is intended to ensure that the fees earned by Ernst & Young LLP are consistent with the maintenance of the independent registered public accounting firm's independence in the conduct of its auditing functions.


ITEM 2—RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP AS
AMERISOURCEBERGEN'S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018

What am I voting on?

You are voting on the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as AmerisourceBergen's independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2018. The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors has appointed Ernst & Young LLP to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2018. Although our governing documents do not require the submission of the appointment of AmerisourceBergen's independent registered public accounting firm to the stockholders for approval, the Board considers it desirable that the stockholders ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP. Should the stockholders not ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as AmerisourceBergen's independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2018, the Audit Committee will investigate the reasons and will reconsider the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP.

What is the oversight relationship between the Audit Committee and our external auditor?

Under its charter, the Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of AmerisourceBergen's external auditor. To execute this responsibility, the Audit Committee engages in a comprehensive annual evaluation of the external auditor's qualifications, performance and independence. In accordance with SEC rules, audit partners are subject to rotation requirements to limit the number of

28       GRAPHIC


Table of Contents

consecutive years an individual partner may provide service to AmerisourceBergen. For lead and concurring audit partners, the maximum number of consecutive years of service in that capacity is five years. The Audit Committee reviews the process that we and Ernst & Young LLP undertake to ensure the rotation of the audit partner responsible for reviewing the audit, and evaluates the qualifications and experience of the individual selected to serve as lead partner for our audit. Ernst & Young LLP has been retained as the external auditor of AmerisourceBergen since 2001 and of its predecessor entity AmeriSource Health Corporation since 1988. The members of the Audit Committee believe that the continued retention of Ernst & Young LLP to serve as our external auditor is in the best interests of AmerisourceBergen and its stockholders.

What services will the independent registered public accounting firm provide?

Audit services provided by Ernst & Young LLP for fiscal year 2018 will include examination of the consolidated financial statements of AmerisourceBergen and services related to periodic SEC filings. Audit services for fiscal year 2018 also will include the audit of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Additionally, Ernst & Young LLP may provide audit-related, tax and other services comparable in nature to the services performed in fiscal years 2016 and 2017, as described under the heading Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm's Fees.

Will representatives of the independent registered public accounting firm be present at the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders?

Representatives of Ernst & Young LLP are expected to be present at the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Such representatives will have an opportunity to make a statement and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

How does the Board of Directors recommend that I vote?

We recommend that you vote For the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as AmerisourceBergen's independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2018.


COMPENSATION COMMITTEE MATTERS

General

Our Compensation and Succession Planning Committee, or the Committee, is composed of independent directors. The Committee is responsible for the design of our executive compensation program and review of succession planning. The Committee reviews and approves the compensation of our executives, including our named executive officers. The Committee also oversees our long-term incentive and savings, retirement, health and welfare plans. The Committee has delegated the administration of our benefit plans to an internal benefits committee, composed of senior finance, human resources and legal executives. The internal benefits committee oversees the selection of investment options under our savings plans and the performance of the investment advisers and plan administrators.

Processes and Procedures

Meetings.    The Committee met four times in fiscal year 2017. The Chairman, in consultation with the other Committee members and management, prepares agendas that address an annual calendar of topics and other matters. The Committee meets without management present, whenever necessary, to discuss matters it deems appropriate.

Role of External Compensation Consultant.    The Committee has sole authority to retain and terminate any consultant or other external advisor, and to approve the fees and other terms of engagement for such consultant or advisor. Each year, the Committee evaluates the qualifications, performance, independence and potential for conflicts of interest of its compensation consultant and any other external advisors to the Committee. This evaluation takes place at the beginning of the fiscal year in the case of an ongoing engagement or prior to the selection of a new consultant or advisor.

GRAPHIC       29


Table of Contents

Pearl Meyer & Partners ("Pearl Meyer") serves as the Committee's compensation consultant. The Committee has determined that Pearl Meyer is independent, and has not had any economic interests or other relationship with AmerisourceBergen or the Committee members that would conflict with its obligation to provide the Committee with impartial and objective advice. Pearl Meyer did not provide any services to our management in fiscal year 2017.

The Committee's compensation consultant advises the Committee on all aspects of executive compensation, including comparative data, competitive positioning of executive pay, plan design, long-term incentive pay practices and market trends. As directed by the Committee, the consultant prepares analysis and recommendations relating to the compensation of our executive officers, including pay recommendations for our Chief Executive Officer ("CEO"). Representatives of Pearl Meyer attended Committee meetings and met privately from time to time with the Committee and individual Committee members to plan for Committee meetings and discuss executive compensation matters.

Role of Management.    Mr. Collis gives the Committee a performance assessment and pay recommendation for senior management, including each of the other named executive officers. Management, in consultation with the Committee's compensation consultant, may also make recommendations on matters of compensation philosophy and plan design. Executives may attend the Committee meetings, but they are not present when the Committee meets in executive session and they do not make recommendations regarding their own pay.

30       GRAPHIC


Table of Contents


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Overview

AmerisourceBergen Corporation is one of the largest global pharmaceutical sourcing and distribution services companies, helping both healthcare providers and pharmaceutical and biotech manufacturers improve patient access to products and enhance patient care. The purpose of our executive compensation program is to attract, motivate and retain the individuals who lead our Company and align their interests with the long-term interests of our stockholders.

Our fiscal year 2017 named executive officers were:

Steven H. Collis   Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Tim G. Guttman   Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
John G. Chou   Executive Vice President and Chief Legal & Business Officer
Peyton R. Howell   Executive Vice President and President, Health Systems & Specialty Care Solutions
Robert P. Mauch   Executive Vice President and Group President, Pharmaceutical Distribution & Strategic Global Sourcing
James D. Frary   Former Executive Vice President and President, AmerisourceBergen Specialty Group

We seek to pay our executive officers fairly and competitively and to link pay with performance. The main elements of our compensation program are base salary, a short-term incentive in the form of an annual cash bonus, and long-term equity incentive awards. We emphasize compensation opportunities that reward our executive officers when they deliver targeted financial results. A significant portion of our executive officers' compensation is equity-based. In fiscal year 2017, incentive compensation (annual cash bonus and equity incentive awards) accounted for approximately 87% of Mr. Collis's total direct compensation (base salary, annual cash bonus and equity incentive awards) and approximately 79% of the average total direct compensation of the other named executive officers.

GRAPHIC

2017 Say-On-Pay Vote

In fiscal 2017, we emphasized our pay for performance culture and did not make significant changes to our compensation program. The compensation of our named executive officers was overwhelmingly approved by stockholders in March 2017 with approximately 95% of stockholder votes cast in favor of our 2017 "say-on-pay" resolution. During fiscal 2017, the Compensation and Succession Planning Committee (the "Compensation Committee") reviewed our executive compensation peer group and worked to align pay opportunities for our executive officers with our compensation philosophy. The Compensation Committee also approved performance

GRAPHIC       31


Table of Contents

metrics for incentive pay that were designed to correlate with the way we evaluate our operational results and reflect measures of performance that drive returns for our stockholders.

Fiscal Year 2017 Compensation Practices and Policies

We believe our executive pay is reasonable and provides appropriate incentives to our executive officers to achieve our financial and strategic goals without encouraging them to take excessive risks in their business decisions. We regularly evaluate the major risks to our business, including how risks taken by management could affect the value of executive compensation. To this end, we note the following regarding our compensation practices:

 


Highlights of Our Executive Compensation Program—Linking Pay with Performance and Mitigating Risk

 

Best Practices

 

  Use financial performance metrics to align pay with performance.
 

 

  Cap payouts under our annual cash bonus plan and performance share plans.
 

 

  Require our CEO to own stock equal in value to 6 times his base salary, and the CFO and other executive officers to own stock equal in value to 3 times their respective base salaries.
 

 

  Require other executives to own our stock and require the amount of their stock ownership to increase with their level of responsibility.
 

 

  Require executive officers to retain all options and equity grants until required ownership levels are met.
 

 

  Apply clawback obligations to annual cash bonus and equity awards for executive officers.
 

 

  Regularly review the Compensation Committee charter to ensure best practices.
 

 

  Engage an independent compensation consultant that reports to the Compensation Committee and that provides no other services to AmerisourceBergen.
 

 

  Consider a peer group in establishing all named executive officer compensation, and consider published compensation survey data for our other executive officers.
 

 

  Prohibit short sales, hedging or pledging of our stock by our executive officers and directors.
 

 

  Require forfeiture of awards upon violation of restrictive covenants.
 

 

  Require double-trigger for change in control payments.
 

 

  Consider burn rate in equity grant decisions and manage use of equity plan conservatively.
 

Practices We

 

  Compensation practices that encourage excessively risky business decisions.
 

Do Not Allow

 

  Paying for poor financial performance under our incentive plans.
 

 

  Granting stock options with an exercise price lower than fair market value.
 

 

  Backdating or retroactively granting options or restricted stock units.
 

 

  Paying dividends on unearned and unvested performance shares.
 

 

  Repricing stock options.
 

 

  Providing tax gross-ups in the event of a change in control.
   

2017 Fiscal Year Business Highlights

The Company's performance in fiscal 2017 included the combination of our legacy AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation (ABDC) and AmerisourceBergen Specialty Group (ABSG) operating segments in order to further align the Company with our customers' needs in a more seamless and unified way and the launch of our Lash Group's new patient support technology ecosystem, Fusion, which is designed to improve patient access to life saving medications and enhance patient engagement and outcomes. Those achievements and others were accomplished against the backdrop of an evolving healthcare landscape. The following highlights of the year include non-GAAP financial measures with respect to which Appendix A to this proxy statement presents reconciliations to the most comparable GAAP financial measures and information about the reasons such non-GAAP financial measures are disclosed:

32       GRAPHIC


Table of Contents

2017 Fiscal Year Executive Compensation Objectives and Actions

The Compensation Committee reviews and makes decisions about executive officer compensation, including the amount of base salary, short-term incentive awards and long-term incentive awards made to our named executive officers. The Compensation Committee takes into account our financial and business results, individual performance and competitive data. In light of these considerations, the Compensation Committee made the following executive compensation decisions in fiscal year 2017:

   


1
See Appendix A for additional information regarding non-GAAP financial measures, including GAAP to non-GAAP reconciliations. For a comprehensive discussion of our GAAP financial results, please refer to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017.

GRAPHIC       33


Table of Contents

We believe that the fiscal year 2017 compensation of our executive officers was aligned with AmerisourceBergen's adjusted fiscal year 2017 results and met our compensation objectives. Our compensation policies have enabled us to attract and retain talented and experienced executive officers. We believe that these policies have benefited AmerisourceBergen over time and will position us for growth in future years.

Setting Executive Compensation

We consider market pay practices as a starting reference point when setting executive compensation. The Compensation Committee assesses whether our level of executive pay is appropriate when compared to industry and market standards. The Compensation Committee's independent compensation consultant assists the Compensation Committee in developing a peer group of companies to serve as the basis for comparing the pay of our named executive officers to the market. We conduct a detailed market review of executive pay to evaluate each element of pay and benefit competitiveness, review pay practices and compare performance against our peer group.

Our peer group is composed of companies with business models and operations comparable to our own, including our two largest direct competitors, and companies that we believe have a similar financial and operational profile. Metrics used to select our peer group include: revenue; market capitalization; number of employees; net income; operating income margin; and return on invested capital. We believe that our peer group reflects the type and complexity of business risks managed by our named executive officers and that we compete with many of the companies in our peer group for executive talent.

In fiscal year 2017, the Compensation Committee, in consultation with its independent compensation consultant, evaluated our peer group to ensure that our peer group companies were still appropriate. Following its review, the Compensation Committee removed three companies, Costco Wholesale Corporation, The Home Depot, Inc. and Ingram Micro Inc., and added six new companies to our peer group: Abbott Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, HCA Holdings, Inc., IQVIA Holdings Inc., Mylan N.V., and Quest Diagnostics Incorporated. Our 2017 peer group as determined by the Compensation Committee was as follows:

  2017 Peer Group

 


    Abbott Laboratories
    Avnet, Inc.
    Cardinal Health, Inc.
    CVS Health Corporation
    Eli Lilly and Company
    Express Scripts Holding Company
    FedEx Corporation








    HCA Holdings, Inc.
    Henry Schein, Inc.
    IQVIA Holdings Inc.
    The Kroger Co.
    Laboratory Corporation of America
    McKesson Corporation







    Mylan N.V.
    Quest Diagnostics Incorporated
    Sysco Corporation
    Target Corporation
    United Parcel Service, Inc.
    Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.







In fiscal year 2017, the Compensation Committee reviewed peer group proxy statement data in evaluating our named executive officers' pay and published compensation survey data in evaluating our other executive officers' pay. When assessing pay levels, the Compensation Committee also reviews the relative positioning of our executive officers with each other. In 2017, the Compensation Committee's consultant concluded that our overall competitive posture for executive pay remained aligned with our pay for performance compensation philosophy.

Target Percentile Compensation Opportunity

Our compensation program targets executive officer pay relative to our peer group as follows:

    
Base Salary





    Total Cash Compensation
(Base Salary + Cash Bonus)


    Total Direct Compensation
(Base Salary + Cash Bonus + LTI)

35th percentile of peer group

      50th percentile of peer group       50th percentile of peer group

We target total direct compensation opportunity in the 50th percentile relative to our peer group. We believe that targeting pay opportunities at the median of our peer group enables us to retain talented and experienced executive officers and is consistent with market-leading practices.

34       GRAPHIC


Table of Contents

Components of the Executive Compensation Program


Pay Element










Award Type









 

Purpose









 

Fixed vs. Variable









 

Performance Measure

Base Salary

     

Cash

     

Provide a regular stream of income and security

     

Fixed

     

The Compensation Committee takes into account job performance, scope of duties and responsibilities, expected future contributions, peer group and other market pay data.

Short-Term Incentive

 

 

Cash

 

 

Motivate executives to improve financial performance year-over-year

Reward executive officers who deliver targeted financial results

 

 

Variable

 

 

Actual payout based on Company performance.

               

Long-Term Incentives

     

Performance Shares, Restricted Stock Units and Stock Options

     

Motivate executive officers to achieve superior business results over long-term

Enhance alignment between management and stockholder interests

Support stock ownership requirements

     

Variable

     

Actual value is determined by Company performance over a three-year time frame and/or linked to stock price.

Base Salary

We target base salary in the 35th percentile for similar positions in our peer group. By positioning base salary below our peer median, we place greater emphasis on incentive compensation for our executive officers.

In November 2016, the Compensation Committee accepted management's recommendation that the named executive officers and other senior executives receive no increase in base salary for fiscal 2017. Subsequently, to reflect their increased responsibilities in connection with the publicly announced restructuring of the Company's operating model and executive leadership, the salaries of Ms. Howell and Messrs. Chou and Mauch were increased, effective June 2017, by 10.6%, 5.8%, and 12.5%, respectively.

FY2017 Short-Term Cash Incentive

The Compensation Committee approves the performance goals and incentive levels for each of our executive officers, and assigns a relative weighting to each performance measure under our cash incentive plan. For each performance measure, there is a threshold and a target. Threshold refers to the minimum acceptable level of performance. We do not pay a bonus on a particular financial measure if our performance is at or below the threshold, except with respect to the adjusted operating income margin financial measure, where we pay 50% at threshold. Target is the expected level of performance. All cash incentive awards are issued to the executive officers pursuant to our Omnibus Incentive Plan.

Executive officers may receive an amount in excess of their target bonus (up to a maximum of 200% of the target incentive) if we exceed target on the key performance metric established for them. Therefore, an individual's actual bonus consists of the amount determined for exceeding the thresholds and, if applicable, an amount (which we refer to as a "stretch" bonus) for exceeding target on the key performance metric established

GRAPHIC       35


Table of Contents

for them. The key performance metric for Messrs. Collis, Guttman and Chou and Ms. Howell was adjusted EPS. The key performance metric for Messrs. Mauch and Frary was operating income of a specific business unit.

The stretch portion is calculated by increasing the earned bonus by an additional 5% for every 1% that actual performance exceeds target on the key performance metric. For example, if actual adjusted EPS exceeded target adjusted EPS by 1%, for the four named executive officers with adjusted EPS as the key metric, the stretch portion would be calculated by multiplying the earned bonus by 5%.

In November 2016, the Compensation Committee approved the following corporate performance measures for our fiscal year 2017 cash incentive plan:

    Corporate Performance Measure




    ​Threshold




    ​Target




    ​Actual Performance1

Adjusted EPS

      $5.28       $5.87       $5.88

Adjusted Operating Income

    $1.9 billion     $2.1 billion     $2.0 billion
           

Adjusted Operating Income Margin

      1.29%       1.31%       1.32%

Free Cash Flow

    $1.2 billion     $1.4 billion     $1.0 billion
           
1
See Appendix A to this proxy statement for additional information regarding non-GAAP financial measures, including GAAP to non-GAAP reconciliations.

The Compensation Committee chose adjusted EPS, adjusted operating income, adjusted operating income margin and free cash flow as corporate-level goals because they are the key metrics used by management to set business goals and evaluate our financial results. In fiscal 2017, we defined the non-GAAP financial measure of free cash flow as net cash provided by operating activities minus capital expenditures. In addition, we communicate our expectations about future business performance to investors by using an adjusted EPS range each fiscal year. We generally set adjusted EPS targets to reflect our long-term business goal of growing adjusted EPS, while allowing for reasonable flexibility to set our annual targets based on the impact of industry trends, other market factors and special items from year to year. The Compensation Committee chose adjusted operating income and adjusted operating income margin to encourage our executive officers to grow our Company's profitability. We use free cash flow as a corporate-level financial metric because the amount of free cash flow that we generate each year is essential for us to maintain appropriate working capital, complete acquisitions, and return capital to stockholders through dividends. The targets for the 2017 cash incentive plan financial performance measures were based on our Board-approved business plan for fiscal year 2017. AmerisourceBergen exceeded target on the adjusted EPS and adjusted operating income margin performance metrics and exceeded threshold on the adjusted operating income performance metric. As a result, the bonus payout for corporate-level metrics was approximately 72.0% of the target incentive amount.

Target and actual fiscal year 2017 cash bonuses for our named executive officers were as follows:

     
Target Incentive


           

Name


  2017 Base
Salary


  Percent of
Base Salary


  Amount
  Maximum Bonus
Potential


  Percentage
Payout versus
Target Incentive



  Actual Bonus
Payout

Steven H. Collis

  $ 1,240,000   150 %   $ 1,860,000   $ 3,720,000   72.0 %   $ 1,339,883

Tim G. Guttman

$ 710,000 100 % $ 710,000 $ 1,420,000 72.0 % $ 511,461

John G. Chou

  $ 634,258   100 %   $ 634,258   $ 1,268,515   72.0 %   $ 456,898

Peyton R. Howell

$ 535,671 100 % $ 535,671 $ 1,071,342 72.0 % $ 385,880

Robert P. Mauch

  $ 621,370   100 %   $ 621,370   $ 1,242,740   35.0 %   $ 217,479

James D. Frary

$ 600,000 100 % $ 600,000 $ 1,200,000 105.3 % $ 631,592

36       GRAPHIC


Table of Contents

The fiscal year 2017 cash bonuses for Messrs. Collis, Guttman and Chou and Ms. Howell were designed to reflect enterprise-wide performance. As a result, 100% of their respective bonus payments was dependent upon the achievement of corporate financial performance goals with adjusted EPS and adjusted operating income each weighted at 30% of the total target incentive and adjusted operating income margin and free cash flow each weighted at 20% of the total target incentive.

Prior to the Company's announcement of its new organizational structure, Messrs. Mauch and Frary were each in charge of a business unit at the Company. As such, a substantial part of their bonuses was tied to business unit performance measures. The Compensation Committee selects business unit performance goals that are designed to help us achieve our overall Company corporate performance goals for the fiscal year (i.e., adjusted EPS, adjusted operating income, adjusted operating income margin and free cash flow). Business unit operating goals also take into account the risk profile and market dynamics in each business.

The fiscal year 2017 cash bonuses for Messrs. Mauch and Frary were based on the following metrics and weighting: 20% on the Company's adjusted EPS; 15% on the Company's adjusted operating income margin; 15% on the Company's free cash flow; 40% on business unit operating income; and 10% on business unit pre-tax profit. Business unit performance metrics were based upon our reporting structure prior to September 30, 2017, pursuant to which Mr. Mauch was Executive Vice President and President of the AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation legacy operating segment and Mr. Frary was Executive Vice President and President of the AmerisourceBergen Specialty Group legacy operating segment. The Compensation Committee believes this mix appropriately linked pay to the respective operating responsibilities of Messrs. Mauch and Frary while also aligning their goals with the broader organization. The Compensation Committee chose business unit operating income because it is the primary indicator of profitability for each business and emphasizes our drive toward efficiency in our operations, and it chose pre-tax profit to focus the business units on capital efficient growth in their respective markets. The 2017 stretch bonuses for Messrs. Mauch and Frary were based on the operating income of the applicable business unit.

The goals for Messrs. Mauch and Frary were intended to be challenging and to provide an incentive for them to drive their business units to help achieve our strategic objectives. For Mr. Mauch, those objectives included integrating recently acquired businesses, increasing operational efficiency, and expanding the distribution center network. For Mr. Frary, those objectives included growth in select global markets and increased profitability through improved application of technology.

In fiscal year 2017, the results for the AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation legacy operating segment did not exceed target on business unit operating income and business unit pre-tax profit. The AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation legacy operating segment did not achieve target on two of the business unit cash incentive financial performance measures applicable to a named executive officer in three of the last five fiscal years (FY13 - FY17). In fiscal year 2017, the results for the AmerisourceBergen Specialty Group legacy operating segment exceeded target on both business unit performance goals. The AmerisourceBergen Specialty Group legacy operating segment did not achieve target on two of the business unit cash incentive financial performance measures applicable to a named executive officer in one of the last five fiscal years (FY13 - FY17).

Looking Ahead: FY2018 Cash Bonus

In November 2017, the Compensation Committee approved performance measures for our fiscal year 2018 annual cash incentive plan. In 2018, the fiscal year cash bonus will continue be paid solely on the attainment of financial performance metrics. For named executive officers whose compensation is based entirely on Company performance, the metrics are the Company's adjusted EPS, adjusted operating income, adjusted operating income margin and adjusted free cash flow. For fiscal 2018, we have defined the non-GAAP financial measure of adjusted free cash flow as net cash provided by operating activities, excluding other significant, unpredictable or non-recurring cash payments or receipts relating to legal settlements, minus capital expenditures. For named executive officers whose compensation is based on both Company and business unit performance, the metrics are the Company's adjusted EPS, adjusted operating income and adjusted operating income margin, and the applicable business unit's operating income and free cash flow.

GRAPHIC       37


Table of Contents

These metrics are intended to be challenging and to provide an incentive to achieve the goals set out in our fiscal year 2018 business plan and the strategic and other priorities established by our long-range plan. The fiscal year 2018 target incentive level for the CEO is 150% of base salary and for the other named executive officers is 100% of base salary, with the opportunity for each named executive officer to earn up to a maximum of 200% of target incentive if we exceed our financial performance goals.

Long-Term Equity Incentives

We use equity awards to motivate our executive officers to achieve superior business results over the long term. Equity awards support our stock ownership requirements and further enhance the alignment between management and stockholder interests. In fiscal year 2017, the annual equity award for our executive officers was allocated 40% in stock options, 20% in restricted stock units and 40% in performance shares. In fiscal year 2018, the annual equity award for our executive officers will be allocated 30% in stock options, 20% in restricted stock units and 50% in performance shares. This mix will provide an incentive to achieve favorable long-term results at a reasonable cost to the Company. Long-term incentives are issued pursuant to our Omnibus Incentive Plan.

In fiscal year 2017, we awarded our named executive officers options to purchase 495,942 shares of our Common Stock, 44,438 restricted stock units of our Common Stock and 88,878 target performance shares. These awards represented approximately 23% of the total equity incentives granted to management and other employees in fiscal year 2017. We believe that it was appropriate to award approximately 23% of the annual equity incentives to our named executive officers because they are in the best position to drive our future results and implement our long-term business strategy. Equity incentives represented approximately 73% of Mr. Collis's total direct compensation and approximately 65%, on average, of the total direct compensation of the other named executive officers in fiscal year 2017.

In approving fiscal year 2017 long-term equity incentive award grants, the Compensation Committee considered a number of factors:

Equity awards are subject to vesting, forfeiture and clawback provisions, described in more detail below and in the sections following the Summary Compensation Table. When an executive officer retires, unvested equity awards will continue to vest according to their schedule and vested options will remain exercisable for the length of their original term (which is currently seven years). We believe these requirements support our goal of retaining executive officers and aligning individual performance with our long-term growth. The post-retirement

38       GRAPHIC


Table of Contents

provisions provide an additional incentive for executive officers, particularly those near retirement, to continue to focus on our long-term performance. Forfeiture and clawback provisions serve as a means to redress detrimental behavior by current and former employees. For additional information about our long-term equity incentive awards see the narrative discussion titled "Stock Awards and Option Awards (Columns (d) and (e))" following the Summary Compensation Table below.

Performance Share Awards

Our performance plan is designed to encourage our executive officers to focus on initiatives that promote the achievement of our long-term goals. Performance share awards are granted annually, and each performance award is based on a performance period covering three fiscal years.

Performance shares are subject to the attainment of performance goals approved by the Compensation Committee. Vesting (or payout of shares) is based on cumulative performance at the end of the applicable three-year performance cycle.

A participating executive officer has the opportunity to earn a payout of between 0% and 150% of his or her target award. If threshold performance for a particular metric is not attained, the executive officer forfeits the right to receive any payout based on that metric. Threshold performance for each metric will result in a share payout equal to 50% of the target award. Target performance for each metric will result in a share payout equal to 100% of the target award. Attaining the maximum goal for each metric will result in a share payout equal to 150% of the target award.

Payout of FY15 - FY17 Performance Shares

In November 2017, the Compensation Committee approved the vesting and payment of the FY15 - FY17 performance shares at 120% of their target award level. The Compensation Committee's determination was based on AmerisourceBergen's achievement of a compound annual adjusted EPS growth rate of 14.0% and an average annual adjusted ROIC of 19.3% for the three-year performance period ended September 30, 2017. (See the footnotes to the table below for how these non-GAAP performance measures are calculated.)

The award metrics for the FY15 - FY17 performance share awards were as follows:

               
Threshold


  Target
  Maximum
  Actual
Performance
                                   

Metric


    Weighting
    Baseline
    Goal
    Payout
Ratio


    Goal
    Payout
Ratio


    Goal
    Payout
Ratio


     

Compound Annual Adjusted EPS(1)

      75%       $3.97       9%       50%       12%       100%       15%       150%       14.0%

Average Annual Adjusted ROIC(2)

      25%             18%       50%       20%       100%       22%       150%       19.3%
                                   
(1)
Compound Annual Adjusted EPS is the mean annual growth rate of adjusted EPS from the baseline over the three-year performance period.

(2)
Average Annual Adjusted ROIC is calculated by taking the average of the Company's adjusted ROIC during the three-year performance period. Adjusted ROIC is calculated by dividing after tax adjusted operating income by invested capital.

Based on our performance, and the respective weighting of each performance metric, the number of shares earned for the FY15 - FY17 performance share awards was calculated as follows:


Metric





    Percentage of Target
Award Allocated


            Performance Multiplier
            Awards Earned

Adjusted EPS

      75%       X       Performance-Determined Payout Ratio       =       Awards Earned Based on Adjusted EPS Performance

Adjusted ROIC

    25%     X     Performance-Determined Payout Ratio     =     Awards Earned Based on Adjusted ROIC Performance
                   

                                      Total Performance Share Awards Earned

GRAPHIC       39


Table of Contents

FY15 - FY17 Performance Shares Earned:


Name





    Shares Earned

Steven H. Collis

      36,277

Tim G. Guttman

    10,829
   

John G. Chou

      7,039

Peyton R. Howell

    6,497
   

Robert P. Mauch

      3,194

James D. Frary

    8,122
   

FY17 - FY19 Performance Share Metrics

The Compensation Committee approved the terms of the FY17 - FY19 performance shares in November 2016, including the following performance metrics and weightings:

    
Metric





  Weighting

Adjusted EPS

  75%

Adjusted ROIC

25%

The Compensation Committee believes the compound adjusted EPS and adjusted ROIC growth goals for the performance shares covering the three-year performance period (beginning on October 1, 2016 and ending September 30, 2019) are challenging and difficult to achieve, but attainable with significant skill and effort on the part of our executive leadership team. The adjusted EPS and adjusted ROIC goals of the FY17 - FY19 performance share awards are consistent with our long-range plan. In the case of the FY17 - FY19 performance share awards, performance will be assessed as of September 30, 2019.

Clawback Policy

All cash and equity awards granted under the Omnibus Incentive Plan are subject to binding, contractual obligations to comply with forfeiture and clawback (i.e., recoupment) provisions. Our executive officers receive their annual cash bonus and equity awards under our Omnibus Incentive Plan. The forfeiture or clawback of shares or other amounts received would apply if the executive officer is terminated for cause, breaches restrictive covenants (during the employment period or two years thereafter), or engages in any conduct (during the employment period or three years thereafter) that results in AmerisourceBergen having to restate its financial statements or engages in certain other misconduct. The forfeiture and clawback provisions of our Omnibus Incentive Plan also apply to any outstanding equity awards held by executive officers. Further, should any additional clawback regulations be promulgated by the SEC or the NYSE, we will modify our current provisions, as needed, in order to comply with such final regulations.

All of our employees who are eligible for equity awards receive those awards pursuant to the Omnibus Incentive Plan. As such, forfeiture and clawback provisions apply to all employees who receive equity awards from us.

Equity Award Grant Practices

We have a written policy on equity grants designed to formalize our equity grant practices and ensure that equity awards will generally be made at specified times. Our equity award policy is not intended to and does not limit the authority of the Compensation Committee under our equity incentive plans, including the Omnibus Incentive Plan. The Compensation Committee generally will review and approve annual equity awards to executive officers and other eligible employees in November of each year, which is near the beginning of our fiscal year. This allows the Compensation Committee to make annual equity awards at the beginning of the relevant performance cycle with the benefit of reviewing results from the immediately preceding performance

40       GRAPHIC


Table of Contents

cycle. We also may make equity awards at other times during the year for new hires or other reasons, including, for example, a job promotion or as a result of an acquisition. In accordance with our policy and our Omnibus Incentive Plan, the Compensation Committee has delegated limited authority to our CEO to approve grants to non-executive officers. Such awards may only be made on the first day of a month (or the next trading day, if the first day of the month is not a trading day). The Compensation Committee must approve any equity awards to our named executive officers.

The exercise price of any stock option award is the closing price of our Common Stock on the date of grant. We do not backdate or retroactively grant options, restricted stock or restricted stock units. We generally schedule Board and Compensation Committee meetings at least one year in advance and, as noted above, generally make annual equity awards to our executive officers at approximately the same time each year. We do not time our equity awards to take advantage of the release of earnings or other major announcements by us or market conditions.

Other Compensation

Our named executive officers receive a limited amount of other benefits as part of a competitive compensation package. These benefits include, as discussed below, a Company matching contribution under our 401(k) plan, which is provided to all employee participants. We provide an allowance for tax and financial planning services for our executive officers to give them the opportunity to maximize the benefits from the compensation and benefits programs offered to them and to enable them to focus more of their time and attention on achieving our financial and strategic goals. In the aggregate, these other benefits constitute only a small percentage of each named executive officer's total compensation.

Deferred Compensation

Executive officers may defer receipt of part or all of their cash compensation under our deferred compensation plan. The plan is intended to promote retention of executive officers by providing a long-term, tax efficient savings opportunity at low cost to us. Amounts deferred under the plan are deemed invested in the plan investment options chosen by the executive officer. The executive officer's account is adjusted for any notional gains and losses on the amounts deferred under the plan.

Employee and Retirement Benefits

Core employee benefits are available to the executive officers on the same basis as all domestic employees generally. These benefits include medical and dental coverage, disability insurance, life insurance and a 401(k) plan.

We offer a benefit restoration plan to selected key management, including the executive officers. We implemented this plan to address the absence of any non-legacy executive retirement plan following the 2001 merger to form the Company and to permit executive officers to receive the full amount of the Company match available for other employees generally under the 401(k) plan. This plan provides an annual contribution amount equal to 3% of a participant's salary and bonus to the extent that his or her compensation exceeds IRS limits applicable to our 401(k) plan. Benefits under the plan are subject to certain vesting requirements based on age and length of service (other than in the event of death, disability or a change in control).

Severance and Change in Control Benefits

Severance Benefits.    We provide severance benefits under specified circumstances to give executive officers a measure of financial security following the loss of employment, to protect the Company from competitive activities after the departure of certain executive officers, and because we believe that these benefits are important to attract and retain our executive officers in a competitive industry. We will provide severance benefits if we discharge an executive officer without cause or such executive officer leaves the Company for good reason. Good reason means a reduction in base salary or our failure to comply with our obligations (including, in some cases, by diminishing the executive officer's authority, duties and responsibilities) under his or her employment agreement. The terms of these benefits are set out in employment agreements and various

GRAPHIC       41


Table of Contents

plans, which are described in the section of this proxy statement titled "Executive Compensation—Employment Agreements."

We do not provide severance benefits if an executive officer is terminated for cause or leaves without good reason. In that case, we would only pay the amount of accrued obligations.

Change in Control.    We do not provide enhanced cash compensation in connection with a change in control of the Company. The vesting of equity awards will be accelerated if an executive officer's employment is involuntarily terminated within two years after a change in control. In the event of a change in control, a shortened performance period, which extends only through the end of the fiscal quarter preceding the change in control, will be used to determine the payout under awards of performance shares. We provide these benefits to provide financial protection to employees following an involuntary loss of employment in connection with a change in control and to enable our executive officers to focus on important business decisions should we be acquired without regard to how the transaction may affect them personally. We believe that this structure provides executive officers with an appropriate incentive to cooperate in completing a change in control transaction. The Board and the Compensation Committee also have discretion under our equity plans to take certain actions in the event of a change in control. These actions include canceling options that are not exercised within 30 days after a change in control; cashing out outstanding options; canceling any restricted stock awards in exchange for the payment of cash, property or a combination of cash and property equal to the award's value; or substituting other property (including securities of another entity) for awards granted under our equity plans.

In addition, there is discretion under the Omnibus Incentive Plan to pay cash bonuses during any year in which a change in control occurs. If this discretion is exercised, bonus payments would be based at target level and/or based on performance for the portion of the fiscal year until the change in control event and paid within 75 days of the change in control.

Any payments that are made to an executive officer under the Omnibus Incentive Plan as a result of termination are not intended to constitute excess parachute payments within the meaning of Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code. The employment agreements of the executive officers require us to reduce these payments, if necessary, to ensure that they do not constitute excess parachute payments.

Separation Agreement.    We entered into a separation agreement with Mr. Frary with a separation date of November 13, 2017. Under the separation agreement, Mr. Frary agreed to two-year non-competition and non-solicitation provisions, and provided the Company with a general release of claims. Mr. Frary forfeited equity awards, including any options, restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards to the extent that any such award had not vested prior to the date of separation. Pursuant to the separation agreement and Mr. Frary's employment agreement with the Company, Mr. Frary is entitled to receive:

Mr. Frary will retain the right to receive accrued benefits under the retirement plans and deferred compensation plans in which he participated. He may also receive continuation coverage under the Company's group health plans pursuant to COBRA for himself (and to the extent permitted under COBRA, for his spouse and eligible

42       GRAPHIC


Table of Contents

dependents) for up to 18 months after his separation from service and will be eligible to receive an amount equal to the COBRA premiums from the Company for an additional 6 months thereafter. Amounts payable to Mr. Frary that we have paid or accrued are included in the Summary Compensation Table. All amounts payable to Mr. Frary under the separation agreement are included in the table on page 53 except for balances under our deferred compensation plan, which are set forth on page 50.

Executive Stock Ownership

Our executive officers must own shares of our Common Stock in an amount equal to a multiple of their base salary. Stock ownership aligns management's interests with those of our stockholders and provides a continuing incentive for management to focus on long-term growth. Under our executive stock ownership guidelines, Mr. Collis must own shares worth six times his base salary and the other executive officers must own shares worth three times their base salaries. Executive officers who become subject to the guidelines have five years from the date of hire or change in status, whichever is later, to comply with the ownership requirements, but must retain all options and equity grants until required ownership levels are met. Following its annual review, the Compensation Committee determined that each of the named executive officers is in compliance with the guidelines.

Derivatives Trading and Hedging Prohibition

No director, officer or employee may buy or sell options on our Common Stock or engage in short sales of our Common Stock. We also prohibit directors and executive officers from pledging our stock and hedging the economic risk of ownership of our Common Stock. We have a written policy for our employees on these matters.

Tax and Accounting Considerations

For our 2017 fiscal year, Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code generally disallows a tax deduction to public companies for annual compensation over $1 million paid to their chief executive officer and the next three most highly compensated executive officers (other than the principal financial officer), and the Internal Revenue Code generally excludes from the calculation of the $1 million cap "qualified performance-based compensation." In fiscal year 2017, a portion of the compensation paid to Messrs. Collis and Mauch was not deductible.

Our Omnibus Incentive Plan was structured so that compensation deemed paid to an executive officer in connection with the exercise of stock options should qualify as performance-based compensation that is not subject to the $1 million limitation. In addition, performance share awards and cash incentive awards with performance-vesting goals tied to one or more of the performance criteria approved by the stockholders were designed to also qualify as performance-based compensation for Section 162(m) purposes. However, restricted stock units subject only to service-vesting requirements will not qualify as such performance-based compensation.

When developing and implementing our executive compensation programs, we considered the potential deductibility of the compensation payable under those programs. Our view was that the deductibility of compensation should be only one of a number of relevant factors taken into consideration, and not the sole governing factor. We believe that it is important to preserve flexibility in administering compensation programs in a manner designed to attract and retain executive officers who are essential to our financial success and to promote various other corporate goals. Accordingly, we had not adopted a policy that all compensation must qualify as deductible under Section 162(m). The Compensation Committee will consider the impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (P.L. 115-97), which was signed into law on December 22, 2017, on the design of the Company's executive compensation programs in the future.

Compensation Committee Report

The Compensation and Succession Planning Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis contained in this proxy statement. Based on this review and discussion, we recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this

GRAPHIC       43


Table of Contents

proxy statement for our 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and incorporated by reference into our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017.

  COMPENSATION AND SUCCESSION PLANNING COMMITTEE

 

Michael J. Long, Chairman
Douglas R. Conant
Kathleen W. Hyle
Henry W. McGee

Executive Compensation Tables

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

The following table sets forth the compensation paid to or earned during fiscal year 2017 by (i) our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, (ii) our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, (iii) the three other most highly compensated executive officers, and (iv) a former executive officer who would have been one of the three other most highly compensated executive officers had he continued to serve as an executive officer of the Company at the end of fiscal year 2017, who we collectively refer to in this proxy statement as our named executive officers.

    (A)
Name and Principal Position



  (B)
Year


  (C)
Salary


  (D)
Stock
Awards



  (E)
Option
Awards



  (F)
Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compensation





  (G)
All
Other
Compensation




  (H)
Total

Steven H. Collis

  2017   $ 1,240,000   $ 4,199,984   $ 2,799,999   $ 1,339,883   $ 327,408   $ 9,907,274

Chairman, President and

  2016   $ 1,234,231   $ 4,019,981   $ 2,680,003   $ 1,330,783   $ 713,178   $ 9,978,176

Executive Officer Chief

  2015   $ 1,190,000   $ 4,019,982   $ 2,679,998   $ 2,447,342   $ 463,504   $ 10,800,826

Tim G. Guttman

  2017   $ 710,000   $ 1,500,027   $ 1,000,004   $ 511,461   $ 121,494   $ 3,842,986

Executive Vice President and

  2016   $ 706,539   $ 1,200,002   $ 800,004   $ 507,987   $ 153,946   $ 3,368,478

Chief Financial Officer