OMB APPROVAL

OMB Number: 3235-0570

Expires: August 31, 2010

Estimated average burden hours per response: 18.9

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM N-CSR

 

CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF
REGISTERED MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES

 

Investment Company Act file number:  811-5410

 

ING Prime Rate Trust

(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)

 

7337 E. Doubletree Ranch Rd., Scottsdale, AZ

 

85258

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

(Zip code)

 

CT Corporation System, 101 Federal Street, Boston, MA 02110

(Name and address of agent for service)

 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: 1-800-992-0180

 

Date of fiscal year end:

February 29

 

 

Date of reporting period:

February 29, 2008

 

 

 



 

Item 1. Reports to Stockholders.

 

The following is a copy of the report transmitted to stockholders pursuant to Rule 30e-1 under the Act (17 CFR 270.30e-1):

 



Funds

Annual Report

February 29, 2008

ING Prime Rate Trust

E-Delivery Sign-up – details inside

This report is submitted for general information to shareholders of the ING Funds. It is not authorized for distribution to prospective shareholders unless accompanied or preceded by a prospectus which includes details regarding the funds' investment objectives, risks, charges, expenses and other information. This information should be read carefully.




ING Prime Rate Trust

ANNUAL REPORT

February 29, 2008

Table of Contents

Portfolio Managers' Report     2    
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm     8    
Statement of Assets and Liabilities     9    
Statement of Operations     10    
Statements of Changes in Net Assets     11    
Statement of Cash Flows     12    
Financial Highlights     13    
Notes to Financial Statements     14    
Portfolio of Investments     25    
Shareholder Meeting Information     58    
Additional Information     59    
Tax Information     61    
Trustee and Officer Information     62    

 

  Go Paperless with E-Delivery!  

Sign up now for on-line prospectuses, fund reports, and proxy statements. In less than five minutes, you can help reduce paper mail and lower fund costs.

Just go to www.ingfunds.com, click on the E-Delivery icon from the home page, follow the directions and complete the quick 5 Steps to Enroll.

You will be notified by e-mail when these communications become available on the internet. Documents that are not available on the internet will continue to be sent by mail.



ING Prime Rate Trust

PORTFOLIO MANAGERS' REPORT

Dear Shareholders:

ING Prime Rate Trust (the "Trust") is a diversified, closed-end management investment company that seeks to provide investors with as high a level of current income as is consistent with the preservation of capital. The Trust seeks to achieve this objective by investing, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of its net assets, plus the amount of any borrowings for investment purposes, in U.S. dollar denominated floating rate secured senior loans.

PORTFOLIO CHARACTERISTICS
AS OF FEBRUARY 29, 2008
 
Net Assets   $ 886,975,904    
Total Assets   $ 1,687,029,654    
Assets Invested in Senior Loans   $ 1,643,761,920    
Senior Loans Represented     586    
Average Amount Outstanding per Loan   $ 2,805,054    
Industries Represented     38    
Average Loan Amount per Industry   $ 43,256,893    
Portfolio Turnover Rate (YTD)     60 %  
Weighted Average Days to Interest Rate Reset     42    
Average Loan Final Maturity     64 months    
Total Leverage as a Percentage of Total Assets
(including Preferred Shares)
    46.71 %  

 

PERFORMANCE SUMMARY

The Trust declared $0.14 of dividends to common shareholders during the fourth fiscal quarter and $0.56 for the year ended February 29, 2008. Based on the average month-end net asset value ("NAV") per share of $7.15, this resulted in an annualized distribution rate of 8.79%(1) for the quarter and 7.95%(1) for the year. The Trust's total net return for the fourth fiscal quarter, based on NAV, was (10.55)% versus a total gross return on the S&P/LSTA Leveraged Loan Index ("LLI")(2) of (5.37)% for the same quarter. For the year, the Trust's total return, based on NAV, was (13.28)% versus (5.29)% gross return for the LLI. The total market value return (based on full reinvestment of dividends) for the Trust's common shares during the fourth fiscal quarter was (12.15)% and (17.25)% for the year ended February 29, 2008.

MARKET REVIEW

The Trust's fiscal year ended February 29, 2008 marked arguably the most extraordinary and challenging period in recorded loan market history. The early part of the year saw a continuation of a very strong issuer's market, as investor demand for senior loans remained exceptionally robust and credit spreads and default rates compressed to record lows. Beginning in mid-summer, however, global credit markets began to quickly unravel as investors in the mortgage and asset backed securities markets struggled with accelerating losses and plummeting valuations. While the corporate loan market is not directly linked to these securities markets (the Trust has never invested directly in mortgages or mortgage-baked securities), they do share, in part, a common investor

(1)  The distribution rate is calculated by annualizing dividends declared during the period and dividing the resulting annualized dividend by the Trust's average net asset value (in the case of NAV) or the average month-end NYSE Composite closing price (in the case of Market). The distribution rate is based solely on the actual dividends and distributions, which are made at the discretion of management. The distribution rate may or may not include all investment income and ordinarily will not include capital gains or losses, if any.

(2)  The LLI is an unmanaged total return index that captures accrued interest, repayments, and market value changes. It represents a broad cross section of leveraged loans syndicated in the United States, including dollar-denominated loans to overseas issuers. Standard & Poor's and the Loan Syndications and Trading Association ("LSTA") conceived the LLI to establish a performance benchmark for the syndicated leveraged loan industry. An investor cannot invest directly in an index.


2



ING Prime Rate Trust

PORTFOLIO MANAGERS' REPORT (continued)

base. As a result of this broad reassessment of risk, underlying demand for senior loans fell dramatically, at a time when the visible supply of new loans coming to market hit an all time high. This extreme "technical" dislocation, in concert with falling short-term interest rates and concerns about the outlook for the U.S. economy, had a decidedly negative impact on loan prices (and loan fund NAVs) during the period, even though default rates, while up noticeably from the all-time low of December 2007, have thus far remained below the long-run historical average. Since the end of the fiscal year, loan prices have recovered somewhat, buoyed by a continued (albeit slow-moving) reduction in the supply overhang and improving, but still opportunistic, investor demand for senior secured loans at what many now consider exceptionally attractive yields.

The Trust's performance during this difficult time must be viewed from two perspectives. Total net returns relative to the LLI were negatively impacted by the use of leverage (see below). We continue to believe that the disciplined use of leverage in this asset category is appropriate and accretive to common shareholders under normal market conditions. The velocity of the technical dislocation described above effectively precluded us from materially reducing leverage sufficiently in advance of the contraction in loan prices. Conversely, performance based on asset selection and industry positioning continues to be solid. The Trust did not hold any defaulted loans over the course of the fiscal year ended February 29, 2008 and is, we believe, well positioned to withstand a rising default rate environment. Further, the Trust's long-standing underweight of the generally riskier component of the loan asset category (e.g., second lien loans) has proved beneficial to recent asset-level performance, as has a continual underweight of problematic industry sectors (e.g. autos and real estate). As loan investors look to increasingly factor in a more challenging fundamental credit landscape, better quality non-investment grade loans have begun to outperform the broader market. We expect that trend to continue.

USE OF LEVERAGE

The Trust utilizes financial leverage to seek to increase the yield to the holders of common shares while maintaining the appropriate credit standards. Using leverage for investment purposes involves borrowing at a floating short-term rate, and investing those proceeds at a higher floating rate. Unlike traditional fixed income asset classes, using leverage in the floating rate

TOP TEN SENIOR LOAN ISSUERS
AS OF FEBRUARY 29, 2008
AS A PERCENTAGE OF:
 
    TOTAL
ASSETS
  NET
ASSETS
 
Charter Communications Operating, LLC     3.2 %     6.0 %  
CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.     2.9 %     5.4 %  
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc.     2.0 %     3.9 %  
Cequel Communications, LLC     2.0 %     3.7 %  
HCA, Inc.     1.9 %     3.7 %  
Georgia Pacific Corporation     1.9 %     3.6 %  
CSC Holdings, Inc.     1.7 %     3.3 %  
Sungard Data Systems, Inc.     1.6 %     3.0 %  
UPC Financing Partnership     1.4 %     2.6 %  
Univision Communications, Inc.     1.3 %     2.6 %  

 

TOP TEN INDUSTRY SECTORS
AS OF FEBRUARY 29, 2008
AS A PERCENTAGE OF:
 
    TOTAL
ASSETS
  NET
ASSETS
 
Healthcare, Education and Childcare     11.6 %     22.0 %  
North American Cable     9.0 %     17.1 %  
Printing & Publishing     6.2 %     11.8 %  
Retail Stores     5.4 %     10.2 %  
Utilities     5.0 %     9.4 %  
Data and Internet Services     4.9 %     9.4 %  
Leisure, Amusement, Entertainment     4.3 %     8.1 %  
Chemicals, Plastics & Rubber     4.3 %     8.1 %  
Foreign Cable, Foreign TV, Radio
and Equipment
    3.8 %     7.1 %  
Oil & Gas     3.6 %     6.8 %  

 


3



ING Prime Rate Trust

PORTFOLIO MANAGERS' REPORT (continued)

senior loan asset class should not expose investors to the same degree of risk from rising short-term interest rates, as the income produced from the Trust's loan investments will adjust in a fashion consistent with the Trust's borrowing costs. The use of leverage can, however, magnify the erosion of the Trust's net asset value in declining markets. As of February 29, 2008, the Trust had $450 million of "Aaa/AAA(3)" rated cumulative auction rate preferred shares outstanding, and $338 million of borrowings outstanding under $550 million in available credit facilities. Total leverage, as a percentage of total assets (including preferred shares), was 46.71% at period end.

Since early February 2008, for the first time in the history of its auction rate preferred shares program, the Trust did not receive hold orders and purchase requests for its preferred shares during their weekly auctions that equaled the full amount of such shares. As a result the amount sold by each selling shareholder was reduced pro rata or to zero. In addition, the dividend rate on such preferred shares, which is normally set by means of a Dutch Auction procedure, automatically reset to the maximum rate permitted under the preferred shares program. That maximum rate is 150% of the applicable commercial paper base rate on the day of the auction. Since early February, Preferred Shareholders have had limited liquidity for their preferred shares.

It is important for investors in the Trust's common and preferred shares to understand that this is a market liquidity issue and not a credit issue. The preferred shares of ING Prime Rate Trust have the highest rating issued by the rating agencies and are backed by the assets of the Trust. Further, even under current conditions, we believe that the Trust will be able to continue to pay the dividends required under its preferred shares program, whether those dividend rates are set by the Dutch Auction procedure or at the maximum rate.

We are very sensitive to the effects recent auction failures are having on holders of the Trust's auction rate preferred shares. We are closely monitoring the situation and are evaluating potential options to restore liquidity to and/or provide additional refinancing options in the context of regulatory guidelines, as well as the economic and tax implications for both common and preferred shareholders. We are also working with industry groups that are exploring with regulators various methods to try to provide liquidity to preferred shares of closed-end funds. There can be no assurance that any means for liquidity will be identified, and if they are, it is possible that the Trust's leverage or its benefits from leverage will diminish.

OUTLOOK

Looking forward, although decent progress has been made in mending the technical imbalance largely responsible for recent loan market woes, we believe substantial headwinds still exist. Global credit markets have not yet returned to full functionality, and most credit investors still envision further write-downs coming from the corporate banking ranks as weaker economic conditions take hold of both the consumer and corporate markets. However, we also believe that

(3)  Obligations rated Aaa by Moody's Investors Service are judged to be of the highest quality, with minimal credit risk. An obligator rated 'AAA' has extremely strong capacity to meet its financial commitments. 'AAA' is the highest Issuer Credit Rating assigned by Standard & Poor's. Credit quality refers to the Trust's underlying investments, not to the stability or safety of this Trust.


4



ING Prime Rate Trust

PORTFOLIO MANAGERS' REPORT (continued)

the recent actions taken by the Federal Reserve to aggressively infuse liquidity into the U.S financial system have not only had an immediate positive psychological impact on investor sentiment, but will provide the foundation for improved credit conditions longer-term. Specific to the senior loan market, we remain of the opinion that, given time, the still present technical imbalance will eventually subside and thus provide a natural catalyst to higher loan prices, even if default rates continue to moderately increase. We also believe that our strategy of investing primarily in the better quality and most liquid non-investment grade bank loans, combined with rigorous ongoing monitoring, has the potential to continue our favorable default experience. Recall that, absent a loss associated with a default, senior bank loans pay off at par, which would provide investors the opportunity to, over time, recapture price declines and price discounts. Investors looking to capitalize on that favorable total return opportunity must have a reasonable risk tolerance and a sufficiently long investment horizon.

  `  
Jeffrey A. Bakalar
Senior Vice President
Senior Portfolio Manager
ING Investment Management Co.
  Daniel A. Norman
Senior Vice President
Senior Portfolio Manager
ING Investment Management Co.
 
   

 

ING Prime Rate Trust
April 11, 2008


5



ING Prime Rate Trust

PORTFOLIO MANAGERS' REPORT (continued)

    Average Annual Total Returns for the
Years Ended February 29, 2008
 
    1 Year   3 Years   5 Years   10 Years  
Based on Net Asset Value (NAV)     (13.28 )%     0.81 %     5.01 %     3.57 %  
Based on Market Value     (17.25 )%     (2.24 )%     4.19 %     1.73 %  
S&P/LSTA Leveraged Loan Index     (5.29 )%     2.27 %     4.20 %     4.13 %  
Credit-Suisse Leveraged Loan Index     (5.13 )%     2.64 %     4.70 %     4.29 %  

 

The table above illustrates the total return of the Trust against the Indices indicated. An index has no cash in its portfolio, imposes no sales charges and incurs no operating expenses. An investor cannot invest directly in an index.

Total returns based on NAV reflect that ING Investments, LLC (the Trust's "Investment Adviser") may have waived or recouped fees and expenses otherwise payable by the Trust.

Performance data represents past performance and is no guarantee of future results. Investment return and principal value of an investment in the Trust will fluctuate. Shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost. The Trust's future performance may be lower or higher than the performance data shown. Please log on to www.ingfunds.com or call (800) 992-0180 to get performance through the most recent month end.

Calculation of total return assumes a hypothetical initial investment at the net asset value (in the case of NAV) or the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") Composite closing price (in the case of Market Value) on the last business day before the first day of the stated period, with all dividends and distributions reinvested at the actual reinvestment price.

Senior loans are subject to credit risks and the potential for non-payment of scheduled principal or interest payments, which may result in a reduction of the Trust's NAV.

This report contains statements that may be "forward-looking" statements. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in the "forward-looking" statements.

The views expressed in this report reflect those of the portfolio managers only through the end of the period of the report as stated on the cover. The portfolio managers' views are subject to change at any time based on market and other conditions.

INDEX DESCRIPTIONS

The LLI is an unmanaged total return index that captures accrued interest, repayments, and market value changes. It represents a broad cross section of leveraged loans syndicated in the United States, including dollar-denominated loans to overseas issuers. Standard & Poor's and the Loan Syndications & Trading Association ("LSTA") conceived the LLI to establish a performance benchmark for the syndicated leveraged loan industry. An investor cannot invest directly in an index.

The Credit-Suisse Leveraged Loan Index is an unmanaged index of below investment grade loans designed to mirror the investable universe of the U.S. dollar-denominated leveraged loan market. An investor cannot invest directly in an index.


6



ING Prime Rate Trust

PORTFOLIO MANAGERS' REPORT (continued)

YIELDS AND DISTRIBUTION RATES

Quarter Ended   Prime Rate   NAV 30-day
SEC Yield(A) 
  Mkt. 30-Day
SEC Yield(A) 
  Annualized Dist.
Rate @ NAV(B) 
  Annualized Dist.
Rate @ Mkt.(B) 
 
February 29, 2008     6.00 %     10.99 %     11.93 %     9.03 %     9.79 %  
November 30, 2007     7.50 %     10.46 %     11.15 %     7.97 %     8.67 %  
August 31, 2007     8.25 %     10.92 %     10.18 %     7.53 %     8.44 %  
May 31, 2007     8.25 %     9.89 %     9.81 %     7.38 %     7.52 %  

 

(A)  Yield is calculated by dividing the Trust's net investment income per share for the most recent thirty days by the net asset value (in the case of NAV) or the NYSE Composite closing price (in the case of Market) at quarter-end. Yield calculations do not include any commissions or sales charges, and are compounded for six months and annualized for a twelve-month period to derive the Trust's yield consistent with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") standardized yield formula.

(B)  The distribution rate is calculated by annualizing each monthly dividend, then averaging the annualized dividends declared for each month during the quarter and dividing the resulting average annualized dividend amount by the Trust's average net asset value (in the case of NAV) or the NYSE Composite closing price (in the case of Market) at the end of the period.

Risk is inherent in all investing. The following are the principal risks associated with investing in the Trust. This is not, and is not intended to be, a description of all risks of investing in the Trust. A more detailed description of the risks of investing in the Trust is contained in the Trust's current prospectus.

Credit Risk: The Trust invests a substantial portion of its assets in below investment grade senior loans and other below investment grade assets. Below investment grade loans involve a greater risk that borrowers may not make timely payment of the interest and principal due on their loans. They also involve a greater risk that the value of such loans could decline significantly. If borrowers do not make timely payments of the interest due on their loans, the yield on the Trust's common shares will decrease. If borrowers do not make timely payment of the principal due on their loans, or if the value of such loans decreases, the value of the Trust's NAV will decrease.

Interest Rate Risk: Changes in short-term market interest rates will directly affect the yield on the Trust's common shares . If short-term market interest rates fall, the yield on the Trust's common shares will also fall. To the extent that the interest rate spreads on loans in the Trust experience a general decline, the yield on the Trust will fall and the value of the Trust's assets may decrease, which will cause the Trust's value to decrease. Conversely, when short-term market interest rates rise, because of the lag between changes in such short-term rates and the resetting of the floating rates on assets in the Trust's portfolio, the impact of rising rates will be delayed to the extent of such lag.

Leverage Risk: The Trust borrows money for investment purposes. Borrowing increases both investment opportunity and investment risk. In the event of a general market decline in the value of assets such as those in which the Trust invests, the effect of that decline will be magnified in the Trust because of the additional assets purchased with the proceeds of the borrowings.


7



ING Prime Rate Trust

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Shareholders and Board of Trustees
ING Prime Rate Trust

We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities, including the portfolio of investments, of ING Prime Rate Trust, as of February 29, 2008, and the related statements of operations and cash flows for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the years in the five-year period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of February 29, 2008, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers or by other appropriate auditing procedures where replies from brokers were not received. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of ING Prime Rate Trust as of February 29, 2008, the results of its operations and its cash flows, the changes in its net assets, and the financial highlights for the periods specified in the first paragraph above, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

Boston, Massachusetts
April 29, 2008


8




ING Prime Rate Trust

STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES as of February 29, 2008

ASSETS:  
Investments in securities at value (Cost $1,842,102,096)   $ 1,649,661,151    
Cash     11,689,975    
Foreign currencies at value (Cost $1,255,057)     1,229,556    
Receivables:  
Investment securities sold     5,964,084    
Interest     17,855,736    
Other     42,419    
Unrealized appreciation on forward foreign currency contracts     541,323    
Prepaid expenses     20,512    
Prepaid facility fees on notes payable     24,898    
Total assets     1,687,029,654    
LIABILITIES:  
Notes payable     338,000,000    
Payable for investment securities purchased     1,853,668    
Accrued interest payable     1,359,855    
Deferred arrangement fees on revolving credit facilities     698,810    
Dividends payable — preferred shares     163,114    
Payable to affilates     1,386,655    
Payable to custodian     75,458    
Accrued trustees fees     44,563    
Unrealized depreciation on forward foreign currency contracts     3,550,376    
Unrealized depreciation on unfunded commitments     2,210,079    
Other accrued expenses     711,172    
Total liabilities     350,053,750    
Preferred shares, $25,000 stated value per share at liquidation
value (18,000 shares outstanding)
    450,000,000    
NET ASSETS   $ 886,975,904    
Net assets value per common share outstanding (net assets less preferred
shares at liquidation value, divided by 145,094,493 shares of beneficial  
interest authorized and outstanding, no par value)
  $ 6.11    
NET ASSETS WERE COMPRISED OF:  
Paid-in capital   $ 1,312,128,054    
Undistributed net investment income     390,926    
Accumulated net realized loss on investments and foreign currency
related transactions
    (228,096,961 )  
Net unrealized depreciation on investments and foreign currency
related transactions
    (197,446,115 )  
NET ASSETS   $ 886,975,904    

 

See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
9



ING Prime Rate Trust

STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS for the Year Ended February 29, 2008

INVESTMENT INCOME:  
Interest   $ 150,101,644    
Arrangement fees earned     578,747    
Other     3,073,112    
Total investment income     153,753,503    
EXPENSES:  
Investment management fees     15,097,475    
Administration fees     4,717,961    
Transfer agent fees     101,022    
Interest expense     22,536,395    
Shareholder reporting expense     179,800    
Custody and accounting expense     834,097    
Professional fees     235,190    
Preferred shares — dividend disbursing agent fees     1,148,193    
ICI fees     2,949    
Postage expense     218,050    
Trustees fees     72,377    
Miscellaneous expense     417,806    
Total expenses     45,561,315    
Net investment income     108,192,188    
REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN (LOSS) FROM INVESTMENTS AND
FOREIGN CURRENCY RELATED TRANSACTIONS:
         
Net realized gain (loss) on:  
Investments     17,974,664    
Foreign currency related transactions     (12,901,195 )  
Net realized gain on investments and foreign currency related transactions     5,073,469    
Net change in unrealized appreciation or depreciation on:  
Investments     (226,464,695 )  
Foreign currency related transactions     (2,324,193 )  
Unfunded commitments     (2,210,079 )  
Net change in unrealized appreciation or depreciation on investments and
foreign currency related transactions
    (230,998,967 )  
Net realized and unrealized loss on investments and foreign currency
related transactions
    (225,925,498 )  
DISTRIBUTIONS TO PREFERRED SHAREHOLDERS:  
From net investment income     (23,475,824 )  
Net decrease in net assets resulting from operations   $ (141,209,134 )  

 

See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
10



ING Prime Rate Trust

STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS

    Year
Ended
February 29,
2008
  Year
Ended
February 28,
2007
 
FROM OPERATIONS:  
Net investment income   $ 108,192,188     $ 103,083,218    
Net realized gain on investments and foreign
currency related transactions
    5,073,469       14,599,027    
Net change in unrealized appreciation or
depreciation on investments and
foreign currency related transactions
    (230,998,967 )     (6,442,840 )  
Distributions to preferred shareholders from net
investment income
    (23,475,824 )     (22,313,381 )  
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting
from operations
    (141,209,134 )     88,926,024    
FROM DISTRIBUTIONS TO COMMON SHAREHOLDERS:  
From net investment income     (81,821,838 )     (80,058,346 )  
Decrease in net assets from distributions
to common shareholders
    (81,821,838 )     (80,058,346 )  
CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS:  
Reinvestment of distributions from common shares     450,139          
Proceeds from shares sold     17,785          
Net increase from capital share transactions     467,924          
Net increase (decrease) in net assets     (222,563,048 )     8,867,678    
NET ASSETS:  
Beginning of year     1,109,538,952       1,100,671,274    
End of year (including undistributed net investment
income of $390,926 and $4,124,094, respectively)
  $ 886,975,904     $ 1,109,538,952    

 

See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
11



ING Prime Rate Trust

STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS for the Year Ended February 29, 2008

INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:
 
Interest received   $ 138,197,551    
Facility fees received     32,030    
Dividend paid to preferred shareholder     (23,549,121 )  
Arrangement fee received     742,902    
Other income received     3,314,797    
Interest paid     (22,788,174 )  
Other operating expenses paid     (23,104,880 )  
Purchases of securities     (1,168,747,773 )  
Proceeds on sale of securities     1,126,524,909    
Net cash provided by operating activities     30,622,241    
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:  
Dividends paid to common shareholders     (81,371,699 )  
Proceeds from shares sold     17,785    
Net increase in notes payable     57,000,000    
Net cash flows provided by financing activities     (24,353,914 )  
Net increase     6,268,327    
Cash at beginning of year     5,421,648    
Cash at end of year   $ 11,689,975    
Reconciliation Of Net Decrease In Net Assets Resulting From
Operations To Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities:
         
Net decrease in net assets resulting from operations   $ (141,209,134 )  
Adjustments to reconcile net decrease in net assets resulting
from operations to net cash provided by operating activities:
         
Change in unrealized depreciation on investments     226,464,695    
Change in unrealized depreciation on foreign currencies     27,482    
Change in unrealized depreciation on forward currency contracts     2,534,758    
Change in unrealized depreciation on unfunded commitments     2,210,079    
Net accretion of discounts on investments     (6,545,513 )  
Net amortization of premiums on investments     350,311    
Net realized gain on sale of investments and forward foreign currency
related transactions
    (5,073,469 )  
Purchases of securities     (1,168,747,773 )  
Proceeds on sale of securities     1,126,524,909    
Decrease in other assets     3,638    
Increase in interest receivable     (5,708,891 )  
Decrease in prepaid facility fees on notes payable     32,030    
Decrease in prepaid expenses     20,547    
Increase in deferred arrangement fees on revolving credit facilities     164,155    
Decrease in accrued interest payable     (251,780 )  
Decrease in dividends payable — preferred shares     (73,297 )  
Decrease in payable to affiliates     (142,745 )  
Increase in accrued trustees fees     13,576    
Increase in other accrued expenses     28,663    
Total adjustments     171,831,375    
Net cash provided by operating activities   $ 30,622,241    
Non Cash Financing Activities  
Reinvestment of distributions from common shares   $ 450,139    

 

See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
12



ING PRIME RATE TRUST  FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

For a common share outstanding throughout the year

    Years Ended February 28 or February 29,  
    2008   2007   2006   2005   2004  
Per Share Operating Performance  
Net asset value, beginning of year   $ 7.65       7.59       7.47       7.34       6.73    
Income (loss) from investment operations:  
Net investment income   $ 0.75       0.71       0.57       0.45       0.46    
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments   $ (1.57 )     0.06       0.12       0.16       0.61    
Total from investment operations   $ (0.82 )     0.77       0.69       0.61       1.07    
Distributions to Common Shareholders from net
investment income
  $ (0.56 )     (0.55 )     (0.46 )     (0.43 )     (0.42 )  
Distribution to Preferred Shareholders   $ (0.16 )     (0.16 )     (0.11 )     (0.05 )     (0.04 )  
Net asset value, end of year   $ 6.11       7.65       7.59       7.47       7.34    
Closing market price at end of year   $ 5.64       7.40       7.02       7.56       7.84    
Total Investment Return(1)   
Total investment return at closing market price(2)    % (17.25 )     13.84       (0.82 )     2.04       28.77    
Total investment return at net asset value(3)    % (13.28 )     8.85       8.53       7.70       15.72    
Ratios/Supplemental Data  
Net assets end of year (000's)   $ 886,976       1,109,539       1,100,671       1,082,748       1,010,325    
Preferred Shares-Aggregate amount outstanding (000's)   $ 450,000       450,000       450,000       450,000       450,000    
Liquidation and market value per share of Preferred Shares   $ 25,000       25,000       25,000       25,000       25,000    
Borrowings at end of year (000's)   $ 338,000       281,000       465,000       496,000       225,000    
Asset coverage per $1,000 of debt(4)    $ 2,125       2,517       2,203       2,140       2,500    
Average borrowings (000's)   $ 391,475       459,982       509,178       414,889       143,194    
Ratios to average net assets including Preferred Shares(5)   
Expenses (before interest and other fees related to revolving 
credit facility)
  % 1.54       1.57       1.64       1.60       1.45    
Net expenses after expense reimbursement   % 3.05       3.27       3.02       2.21       1.65    
Gross expenses prior to expense reimbursement   % 3.05       3.27       3.02       2.22       1.65    
Net investment income   % 7.23       6.68       5.44       4.21       4.57    
Ratios to average net assets plus borrowings  
Expenses (before interest and other fees related to revolving  
credit facility)
  % 1.60       1.56       1.58       1.63       1.84    
Net expenses after expense reimbursement   % 3.17       3.25       2.90       2.26       2.09    
Gross expenses prior to expense reimbursement   % 3.17       3.25       2.90       2.27       2.09    
Net investment income   % 7.53       6.63       5.24       4.32       5.82    
Ratios to average net assets  
Expenses (before interest and other fees related to revolving  
credit facility)
  % 2.20       2.21       2.33       2.29       2.11    
Net expenses after expense reimbursement   % 4.36       4.62       4.27       3.17       2.40    
Gross expenses prior to expense reimbursement   % 4.36       4.62       4.27       3.18       2.40    
Net investment income   % 10.35       9.42       7.71       6.04       6.68    
Portfolio turnover rate   % 60       60       81       93       87    
Common shares outstanding at end of year (000's)     145,094       145,033       145,033       145,033       137,638    

 

(1)  Total investment return calculations are attributable to common shares.

(2)  Total investment return measures the change in the market value of your investment assuming reinvestment of dividends and capital gain distributions, if any, in accordance with the provisions of the Trust's dividend reinvestment plan.

(3)  Total investment return at net asset value has been calculated assuming a purchase at net asset value at the beginning of each period and a sale at net asset value at the end of each period and assumes reinvestment of dividends and capital gain distributions in accordance with the provisions of the dividend reinvestment plan.

This calculation differs from total investment return because it excludes the effects of changes in the market values of the Trust's shares.

(4)  Asset coverage represents the total assets available for settlement of Preferred Stockholder's interest and notes payables in relation to the Preferred Shareholder interest and notes payable balance outstanding. The Preferred Shares were first offered November 2, 2000.

(5)  Ratios do not reflect the effect of dividend payments to Preferred Shareholders; income ratios reflect income earned on assets attributable to the Preferred Shares; ratios do not reflect any add-back for the borrowings.

See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
13




ING Prime Rate Trust

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS as of February 29, 2008

NOTE 1 — ORGANIZATION

ING Prime Rate Trust (the "Trust"), a Massachusetts business trust, is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "1940 Act"), as a diversified, closed-end, management investment company. The Trust invests primarily in senior loans, which generally are not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "1933 Act"), and which contain certain restrictions on resale and cannot be sold publicly. These loans bear interest (unless otherwise noted) at rates that float periodically at a margin above the London Inter-Bank Offered Rate ("LIBOR") and other short-term rates.

NOTE 2 — SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The following is a summary of the significant accounting policies consistently followed by the Trust in the preparation of its financial statements. The policies are in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for investment companies.

A.  Senior Loan and Other Security Valuation. Senior loans held by the Trust are normally valued at the average of the means of one or more bid and ask quotations obtained from an independent pricing service or other sources determined by the Trust's Board of Trustees ("Board") to be independent and believed to be reliable. Loans for which reliable market value quotations are not readily available may be valued with reference to another loan or a group of loans for which reliable quotations are readily available and whose characteristics are comparable to the loan being valued. Under this approach, the comparable loan or loans serve as a proxy for changes in value of the loan being valued.

The Trust has engaged an independent pricing service to provide market value quotations from dealers in loans and, when such quotations are not readily available, to calculate values under the proxy procedure described above. As of February 29, 2008, 98.92% of total loans were valued based on these procedures. It is expected that most of the loans held by the Trust will continue to be valued with reference to quotations from the independent pricing service or with reference to the proxy procedure described above.

Prices from a pricing source may not be available for all loans and ING Investments, LLC (the "Investment Adviser") or ING Investment Management Co. ("ING IM" or the "Sub-Adviser"), may believe that the price for a loan derived from market quotations or the proxy procedure described above is not reliable or accurate. Among other reasons, this may be the result of information about a particular loan or borrower known to the Investment Adviser or the Sub-Adviser that the Investment Adviser or the Sub-Adviser believes may not be known to the pricing service or reflected in a price quote. In this event, the loan is valued at fair value as determined in good faith under procedures established by the Board and in accordance with the provisions of the 1940 Act. Under these procedures, fair value is determined by the Investment Adviser or Sub-Adviser and monitored by the Board through its Valuation, Brokerage and Proxy Committee.

In fair valuing a loan, consideration is given to several factors, which may include, among others, the following: (i) the characteristics of and fundamental analytical data relating to the loan, including the cost, size, current interest rate, period until the next interest rate reset, maturity and base lending rate of the loan, the terms and conditions of the loan and any related agreements, and the position of the loan in the borrower's debt structure; (ii) the nature, adequacy and value of the collateral, including the Trust's rights, remedies and interests with respect to the collateral; (iii) the creditworthiness of the borrower and the cash flow coverage of outstanding principal and interest, based on an evaluation of its financial condition, financial statements and information about the borrower's business, cash flows, capital structure and future prospects; (iv) information relating to the market for the loan,


14



ING Prime Rate Trust

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS as of February 29, 2008 (continued)

NOTE 2 — SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

including price quotations for, and trading in, the loan and interests in similar loans; (v) the reputation and financial condition of the agent for the loan and any intermediate participants in the loan; (vi) the borrower's management; and (vii) the general economic and market conditions affecting the fair value of the loan. Securities for which the primary market is a national securities exchange are valued at the last reported sale price. Securities reported by NASDAQ will be valued at the NASDAQ Official Closing Price. Securities traded in the over-the-counter market and listed securities for which no sale was reported on a valuation date are valued at the mean between the last reported bid and ask price on such exchange. Securities, other than senior loans, for which reliable market value quotations are not readily available, and all other assets, will be valued at their respective fair values as determined in good faith by, and under procedures established by, the Board. Investments in securities maturing in 60 days or less from the date of acquistion are valued at amortized cost which approximates market value.

B.  Federal Income Taxes. It is the Trust's policy to comply with subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code and related excise tax provisions applicable to regulated investment companies and to distribute substantially all of its net investment income and net realized capital gains to its shareholders. Therefore, no federal income tax provision is required. No capital gain distributions will be made by the Trust until any capital loss carryforwards have been fully utilized or expire.

C.  Security Transactions and Revenue Recognition. Revolver and delayed draw loans are booked on a settlement date basis. Security transactions and senior loans are accounted for on trade date (date the order to buy or sell is executed). Realized gains or losses are reported on the basis of identified cost of securities sold. Dividend income is recognized on the ex-dividend date. Interest income is recorded on an accrual basis at the then-current interest rate of the loan. The accrual of interest on loans is partially or fully discontinued when, in the opinion of management, there is an indication that the borrower may be unable to meet payments as they become due. If determined to be uncollectable, accrued interest is also written off. Cash collections on non-accrual senior loans are generally applied as a reduction to the recorded investment of the loan. Senior loans are generally returned to accrual status only after all past due amounts have been received and the borrower has demonstrated sustained performance. For all loans, except revolving credit facilities, fees received are treated as discounts and are accreted whereas premiums are amortized. Fees associated with revolving credit facilities are deferred and recognized over the shorter of four years or the actual term of the loan.

D.  Foreign Currency Translation. The books and records of the Trust are maintained in U.S. dollars. Any foreign currency amounts are translated into U.S. dollars on the following basis:

(1)  Market value of investment securities, other assets and liabilities — at the exchange rates prevailing at the end of the day.

(2)  Purchases and sales of investment securities, income and expenses — at the rates of exchange prevailing on the respective dates of such transactions.

Although the net assets and the market values are presented at the foreign exchange rates at the end of the day, the Trust does not isolate the portion of the results of operations resulting from changes in foreign exchange rates on investments from the fluctuations arising from changes in market prices of securities held. Such fluctuations are included with the net realized and unrealized gains or losses from investments. For securities, which are subject to foreign withholding tax upon disposition, liabilities are recorded on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities for the estimated tax withholding based on the securities current market value. Upon disposition, realized gains or losses on such securities are recorded net of foreign withholding tax.


15



ING Prime Rate Trust

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS as of February 29, 2008 (continued)

NOTE 2 — SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

Reported net realized foreign exchange gains or losses arise from sales of foreign currencies, currency gains or losses realized between the trade and settlement dates on securities transactions, the difference between the amounts of dividends, interest, and foreign withholding taxes recorded on the Trust's books, and the U.S. dollar equivalent of the amounts actually received or paid. Net unrealized foreign exchange gains and losses arise from changes in the value of assets and liabilities other than investments in securities at fiscal year end, resulting from changes in the exchange rate. Foreign security and currency transactions may involve certain considerations and risks not typically associated with investing in U.S. companies and the U.S. government. These risks include, but are not limited to, revaluation of currencies and future adverse political and economic developments which could cause securities and their markets to be less liquid and prices more volatile than those of comparable U.S. companies and U.S. government securities.

E.  Forward Foreign Currency Contracts. The Trust may enter into forward foreign currency contracts primarily to hedge against foreign currency exchange rate risks on its non-U.S. dollar denominated investment securities. When entering into a currency forward contract, the Trust agrees to receive or deliver a fixed quantity of foreign currency for an agreed-upon price on an agreed future date. These contracts are valued daily and the Trust's net equity therein, representing unrealized gain or loss on the contracts as measured by the difference between the forward foreign exchange rates at the dates of entry into the contracts and the forward rates at the reporting date, is included in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Realized and unrealized gains and losses are included in the Statement of Operations. These instruments involve market and/or credit risk in excess of the amount recognized in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Risks arise from the possible inability of counterparties to meet the terms of their contracts and from movement in currency and securities values and interest rates. Open forward foreign currency contracts are presented following the respective Portfolio of Investments.

F.  Distributions to Common Shareholders. The Trust declares and pays dividends monthly from net investment income. Distributions from capital gains, if any, are declared and paid annually. The Trust may make additional distributions to comply with the distribution requirements of the Internal Revenue Code. The character and amounts of income and gains to be distributed are determined in accordance with federal income tax regulations, which may differ from U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for investment companies. The Trust records distributions to its shareholders on the ex-dividend date.

G.  Dividend Reinvestments. Pursuant to the Trust's Shareholder Investment Program (the "Program"), DST Systems, Inc. ("DST"), the Program administrator, purchases, from time to time, shares of beneficial interest of the Trust on the open market to satisfy dividend reinvestments. Such shares are purchased on the open market only when the closing sale or bid price plus commission is less than the NAV per share of the Trust's common shares on the valuation date. If the market price plus commissions is equal to or exceeds NAV, new shares are issued by the Trust at the greater of (i) NAV or (ii) the market price of the shares during the pricing period, minus a discount of 5%.

H.  Use of Estimates. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of increases and decreases in net assets from operations during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.


16



ING Prime Rate Trust

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS as of February 29, 2008 (continued)

NOTE 2 — SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

I.  Share Offerings. The Trust issues shares under various shelf registration statements, whereby the net proceeds received by the Trust from share sales may not be less than the greater of (i) the NAV per share or (ii) 94% of the average daily market price over the relevant pricing period.

NOTE 3 — INVESTMENTS

For the year ended February 29, 2008, the cost of purchases and the proceeds from principal repayment and sales of investments, excluding short-term notes, totaled $1,137,452,291 and $1,139,645,431, respectively. At February 29, 2008, the Trust held senior loans valued at $1,643,761,920 representing 99.6% of its total investments. The market value of these assets is established as set forth in Note 2.

The senior loans acquired by the Trust typically take the form of a direct lending relationship with the borrower, and are typically acquired through an assignment of another lender's interest in a loan. The lead lender in a typical corporate loan syndicate administers the loan and monitors the collateral securing the loan.

Common and preferred shares, and stock purchase warrants held in the portfolio were acquired in conjunction with loans held by the Trust. Certain of these stocks and warrants are restricted and may not be publicly sold without registration under the 1933 Act, or without an exemption under the 1933 Act. In some cases, these restrictions expire after a designated period of time after issuance of the shares or warrants.


17



ING Prime Rate Trust

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS as of February 29, 2008 (continued)

NOTE 3 — INVESTMENTS (continued)

Dates of acquisition and cost of assigned basis of restricted securities are as follows:

    Date of
Acquisition
  Cost or
Assigned Basis
 
Allied Digital Technologies Corporation (Residual Interest in
Bankruptcy Estate)
  06/05/02   $ 100    
Block Vision Holdings Corporation (571 Common Shares)   09/17/02        
Boston Chicken, Inc. (Residual Interest in Boston Chicken Plan Trust)   12/26/00     9,893    
Cedar Chemical (Liquidation Interest)   12/31/02        
Covenant Care, Inc. (Warrants for 19,000 Common Shares,
Expires January 13, 2005)
  12/22/95        
Covenant Care, Inc. (Warrants for 26,901 Common Shares,
Expires March 31, 2013)
  01/18/02        
Decision One Corporation (1,752,103 Common Shares)   05/17/05     1,116,773    
Enterprise Profit Solutions (Liquidation Interest)   10/21/02        
EquityCo, LLC (Warrants for 28,752 Common Shares)   02/25/05        
Euro United Corporation (Residual Interest in Bankruptcy Estate)   06/21/02     100    
Grand Union Company (Residual Interest in Bankruptcy Estate)   07/01/02     2,576    
Humphrey's, Inc. (Residual Interest in Bankruptcy Estate)   05/15/02     50    
IAP Acquisition Corporation (3,524 Common Shares)   08/29/03        
IAP Acquisition Corporation (1,084 Common Shares)   08/29/03     3,524,300    
IAP Acquisition Corporation (1,814 Common Shares)   08/29/03        
IAP Acquisition Corporation (17,348 Common Shares)   08/29/03     428,603    
Imperial Home Décor Group, Inc. (Liquidation Interest)   01/22/04        
IT Group, Inc. (Residual Interest in Bankruptcy Estate)   09/12/03     25    
Kevco Inc. (Residual Interest in Bankruptcy Estate)   06/05/02     25    
Lincoln Paper & Tissue (Warrants for 291 Common Shares,
Expires August 14, 2015)
  08/25/05        
Lincoln Pulp and Easten Fine (Residual Interest in Bankruptcy Estate)   06/08/04        
Norwood Promotional Products, Inc. (104,148 Common Shares)   08/23/04     32,939    
Norwood Promotional Products, Inc. (Contingent Value Rights)   12/14/07     377,999    
Safelite Realty Corporation (57,804 Common Shares)   10/12/00        
Transtar Metals (Residual Interest in Bankruptcy Estate)   01/09/03     40,230    
TSR Wireless, LLC (Residual Interest in Bankruptcy Estate)   10/15/02        
US Office Products Company (Residual Interest in Bankruptcy Estate)   02/11/04        
Total Restricted Securities excluding senior loans (market value
of $840,481 was 0.10% of net assets at February 29, 2008)
      $ 5,533,613    

 


18



ING Prime Rate Trust

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS as of February 29, 2008 (continued)

NOTE 4 — MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION AGREEMENTS

The Trust has entered into an investment management agreement ("Investment Advisory Agreement") with the Investment Adviser, an Arizona limited liability company, to provide advisory and management services. The Investment Advisory Agreement compensates the Investment Adviser with a fee, computed daily and payable monthly, at an annual rate of 0.80% of the Trust's Managed Assets. For purposes of the Investment Advisory Agreement, "Managed Assets" shall mean the Trust's average daily gross asset value, minus the sum of the Trust's accrued and unpaid dividends on any outstanding preferred shares and accrued liabilities (other than liabilities for the principal amount of any borrowings incurred, commercial paper or notes issued by the Trust and the liquidation preference of any outstanding preferred shares).

The Investment Adviser entered into a Sub-Advisory agreement with ING IM, a Connecticut corporation. Subject to such policies as the Board or the Investment Adviser may determine, ING IM manages the Trust's assets in accordance with the Trust's investment objectives, policies, and limitations.

The Trust has also entered into an administration agreement with ING Funds Services, LLC (the "Administrator") to provide administrative services and also to furnish facilities. The Administrator is compensated with a fee, computed daily and payable monthly, at an annual rate of 0.25% plus the proceeds of any outstanding borrowings of the Trust's Managed Assets.

The Investment Adviser, ING IM and the Administrator are indirect, wholly-owned subsidiaries of ING Groep N.V. ("ING Groep"). ING Groep is one of the largest financial services organizations in the world, and offers an array of banking, insurance and asset management services to both individual and institutional investors.

NOTE 5 — TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES AND RELATED PARTIES

At February 29, 2008, the Trust had the following amounts recorded in payables to affiliates on the accompanying Statement of Assets and Liabilities:

Accrued Investment
Management Fees
  Accrued
Administrative Fees
  Total  
$ 1,056,499     $ 330,156     $ 1,386,655    

 

The Trust has adopted a Retirement Policy ("Policy") covering all independent trustees of the Trust who will have served as an independent trustee for at least five years at the time of retirement. Benefits under this Policy are based on an annual rate as defined in the Policy agreement.

NOTE 6 — COMMITMENTS

The Trust has entered into both a $90 million 364-day revolving credit agreement which matures August 20, 2008 and a $460 million 364-day revolving securitization facility which matures June 12, 2008, collateralized by assets of the Trust. Borrowing rates under these agreements are based on a fixed spread over LIBOR, the federal funds rate, or a commercial paper-based rate. Prepaid arrangement fees for these facilities are amortized over the term of the agreements. The amount of borrowings outstanding at February 29, 2008, was $338 million. Weighted average interest rate on outstanding borrowings was 5.63%, excluding fees related to the unused portion of the facilities, and other fees. The amount of borrowings represented 20.0% of total assets at February 29, 2008. Average borrowings for the year ended February 29, 2008 were $391,475,410 and the average annualized interest rate was 5.75% excluding other fees related to the unused portion of the facilities, and other fees.


19



ING Prime Rate Trust

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS as of February 29, 2008 (continued)

NOTE 6 — COMMITMENTS (continued)

As of February 29, 2008, the Trust had unfunded loan commitments pursuant to the terms of the following loan agreements:

Advance Food Company   $ 116,878    
Calpine Corporation     1,785,000    
Cannery Casino Resorts     755,906    
Cellular South, Inc.     500,000    
Cengage Learning, Inc.     3,333,333    
Centaur Gaming     350,877    
Coach America Holdings, Inc.     442,989    
Coleto Creek Power     4,625,000    
Community Health Systems, Inc.     2,645,012    
Fleetcor Technologies Operating
Company, LLC
    116,667    
Fountainebleau Resorts, LLC     966,667    
Golden Nugget, Inc.     545,455    
Hub International Holdings, Inc.   $ 81,046    
Iasis Healthcare Corporation     266,614    
Kerasotes Theatres, Inc.     996,930    
Las Vegas Sands LLC     1,600,000    
Longview Power LLC     96,000    
Meg Energy Corporation     1,880,000    
Ply Gem Industries, Inc.     1,000,000    
Sturm Foods, Inc.     500,000    
United Surgical Partners
International, Inc.
    117,742    
Univision Communications     973,323    
Valassis Communications, Inc.     320,000    
    $ 24,015,439    

 

The unrealized depreciation on these commitments of $2,210,079 as of February 29, 2008 is reported as such on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities.

NOTE 7 — RIGHTS AND OTHER OFFERINGS

As of February 29, 2008, outstanding share offerings pursuant to shelf registrations were as follows:

Registration
Date
  Shares
Registered
  Shares
Remaining
 
  9/15/98       25,000,000       12,372,589    
  3/04/99       5,000,000       3,241,645    

 

On November 2, 2000, the Trust issued 3,600 shares each of Series M, Series W and Series F Auction Rate Cumulative Preferred Shares, $0.01 Par Value, $25,000 liquidation preference, for a total issuance of $270 million. Also, on November 16, 2000, the Trust issued 3,600 shares of Series T and Series Th Auction Rate Cumulative Preferred Shares, $0.01 Par Value, $25,000, liquidation preference, for a total issuance of $180 million. The Trust used the net proceeds of the offering to partially pay down the then existing indebtedness and to purchase additional senior loans. Preferred Shares pay dividends based on a rate set at auctions, normally held every 7 days. In most instances dividends are also payable every 7 days, on the first business day following the end of the rate period. Preferred shares have no stated conversion, redemption or liquidation date, but may be redeemed at the election of the Trust. Such shares may only be redeemed by the Preferred Shareholders if the Trust fails to meet certain credit quality thresholds within its portfolio.

Since early February 2008, for the first time in the history of its auction rate preferred shares program, the Trust did not receive hold orders and purchase requests for its preferred shares during their weekly auctions that equaled the full amount of such shares. As a result the amount sold by each selling shareholder was reduced pro rata or to zero. In addition, the dividend rate on such preferred shares, which is normally set by means of a Dutch Auction procedure, automatically reset to the maximum rate permitted under the preferred shares program. That maximum rate is 150% of the applicable commercial paper base rate on the day of the auction.

NOTE 8 — CUSTODIAL AGREEMENT

State Street Bank and Trust Company ("SSB") serves as the Trust's custodian and recordkeeper. Custody fees paid to SSB are reduced by earnings credits based on the cash balances held by SSB for the Trust. There were no earnings credits for the year ended February 29, 2008.


20



ING Prime Rate Trust

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS as of February 29, 2008 (continued)

NOTE 9 — SUBORDINATED LOANS AND UNSECURED LOANS

The Trust may invest in subordinated loans and in unsecured loans. The primary risk arising from investing in subordinated loans or in unsecured loans is the potential loss in the event of default by the issuer of the loans. The Trust may acquire a subordinated loan only if, at the time of acquisition, it acquires or holds a senior loan from the same borrower. The Trust will acquire unsecured loans only where the Investment Adviser believes, at the time of acquisition, that the Trust would have the right to payment upon default that is not subordinate to any other creditor. Subject to the aggregate 20% limit on other investments, the Trust may invest up to 20% of its total assets in unsecured floating rate loans, notes and other debt instruments and 5% of its total assets in floating rate subordinated loans. As of February 29, 2008, the Trust held 0.3% of its total assets in subordinated loans and unsecured loans.

NOTE 10 — CAPITAL SHARES

Transactions in capital shares and dollars were as follows:

    Prime Rate Trust  
    Year Ended
February 29,
2008
  Year Ended
February 28,
2007
 
Number of Shares  
Reinvestment of distributions from common shares     58,938          
Proceeds from shares sold     2,320          
Net increase in shares outstanding     61,258          
Dollar Amount ($)  
Reinvestment of distributions from common shares   $ 450,139     $    
Proceeds from shares sold     17,785          
Net increase   $ 467,924     $    

 

NOTE 11 — FEDERAL INCOME TAXES

The amount of distributions from net investment income and net realized capital gains are determined in accordance with federal income tax regulations, which may differ from U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for investment companies. These book/tax differences may be either temporary or permanent. Permanent differences are reclassified within the capital accounts based on their federal tax-basis treatment; temporary differences are not reclassified. Key differences include the treatment of short-term capital gains, foreign currency transactions, and wash sale deferrals. Distributions in excess of net investment income and/or net realized capital gains for tax purposes are reported as distributions of paid-in capital.

The following permanent tax differences have been reclassified as of February 29, 2008:

Paid-in
Capital
  Undistributed
Net Investment Income
  Accumulated
Net Realized
Gains/(Losses)
 
$ (19,753,526 )   $ (6,627,694 )   $ 26,381,220    

 

Dividends paid by the Trust from net investment income and distributions of net realized short-term capital gains are, for federal income tax purposes, taxable as ordinary income to shareholders.

The tax composition of dividends and distributions to shareholders was as follows:

Year Ended February 29, 2008   Year Ended February 28, 2007  
Ordinary Income   Ordinary Income  
$ 105,297,662     $ 102,371,727    

 


21



ING Prime Rate Trust

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS as of February 29, 2008 (continued)

NOTE 11 — FEDERAL INCOME TAXES (continued)

The tax-basis components of distributable earnings and the expiration dates of the capital loss carryforwards which may be used to offset future realized capital gains for federal income tax purposes as of February 29, 2008 were:

Unrealized
Appreciation/
(Depreciation)
  Post-October
Currency
Losses
Deferred
  Post-October
Capital
Losses
Deferred
  Capital
Loss
Carryforwards
  Expiration
Dates
 
$ (194,491,261 )   $ (2,455,013 )   $ (2,086,199 )   $ (847,193 )     2009    
              (47,376,376 )     2010    
              (97,064,717 )     2011    
              (57,686,392 )     2012    
              (22,421,058 )     2013    
              (560,828 )     2014    
            $ (225,956,564 )        

 

The Trust's major tax jurisdictions are federal and Arizona. The earliest tax year that remains subject to examination by these jurisdictions is 2003.

NOTE 12 — OTHER ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued FASB Interpretation No. 48 ("FIN 48"), "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes." This standard defines the threshold for recognizing the benefits of tax-return positions in the financial statements as "more-likely-than-not" to be sustained upon challenge by the taxing authority and requires measurement of a tax position meeting the more-likely-than-not criterion, based on the largest benefit that is more than 50 percent likely to be realized. FIN 48 was effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006, with early application permitted if no interim financial statements have been issued. Acknowledging the unique issues that FIN 48 presents for investment companies that calculate NAVs, the SEC indicated that they would not object if a fund implemented FIN 48 in its NAV calculation as late as its last NAV calculation in the first required financial statement reporting period for its fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2006. At adoption, companies must adjust their financial statements to reflect only those tax positions that are more likely-than-not to be sustained as of the adoption date. Management of the Trust has analyzed the tax positions of the Trust. Upon adoption of FIN 48, we identified no uncertain tax positions that have not met the more likely-than-not standard.

On September 15, 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 ("SFAS No. 157"), "Fair Value Measurements." The new accounting statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (an exit price). SFAS No. 157 also stipulates that, as a market-based measurement, fair value should be determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, and establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between (a) market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity (observable inputs) and (b) the reporting entity's own assumptions about market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available in the circumstances (unobservable inputs). SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. As of February 29, 2008, management of the Trust is currently assessing the potential impact, in addition to expanded financial statement disclosure, that may result from adopting SFAS No. 157.

On March 19, 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 161 ("SFAS No. 161"), "Disclosure about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities." This new


22



ING Prime Rate Trust

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS as of February 29, 2008 (continued)

NOTE 12 — OTHER ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS (continued)

accounting statement requires enhanced disclosures about an entity's derivative and hedging activities. Entities are required to provide enhanced disclosures about (a) how and why an entity invests in derivatives, (b) how derivatives are accounted for under Statement 133, and (c) how derivatives affect an entity's financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 also requires enhanced disclosures regarding credit-risk-related contingent features of derivative instruments.

SFAS No. 161 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. As of February 29, 2008, management of the Trust is currently assessing the impact of the expanded financial statement disclosures that will result from adopting SFAS No. 161.

NOTE 13 — INFORMATION REGARDING TRADING OF ING'S US MUTUAL FUNDS

As discussed in earlier supplements filed with the SEC, ING Investments, LLC ("Investments"), the adviser to the ING Funds, has reported to the Boards of Directors/Trustees (the "Boards") of the ING Funds that, like many U.S. financial services companies, Investments and certain of its U.S. affiliates have received informal and formal requests for information since September 2003 from various governmental and self-regulatory agencies in connection with investigations related to mutual funds and variable insurance products. Investments has advised the Boards that it and its affiliates have cooperated fully with each request.

In addition to responding to regulatory and governmental requests, Investments reported that management of U.S. affiliates of ING Groep N.V., including Investments (collectively, "ING"), on their own initiative, have conducted, through independent special counsel and a national accounting firm, an extensive internal review of trading in ING insurance, retirement, and mutual fund products. The goal of this review was to identify any instances of inappropriate trading in those products by third parties or by ING investment professionals and other ING personnel. ING's internal review related to mutual fund trading is now substantially completed. ING has reported that, of the millions of customer relationships that ING maintains, the internal review identified several isolated arrangements allowing third parties to engage in frequent trading of mutual funds within ING's variable insurance and mutual fund products, and identified other circumstances where frequent trading occurred, despite measures taken by ING intended to combat market timing. ING further reported that each of these arrangements has been terminated and fully disclosed to regulators. The results of the internal review were also reported to the independent members of the Boards.

Investments has advised the Boards that most of the identified arrangements were initiated prior to ING's acquisition of the businesses in question in the U.S. Investments further reported that the companies in question did not receive special benefits in return for any of these arrangements, which have all been terminated.

Based on the internal review, Investments has advised the Boards that the identified arrangements do not represent a systemic problem in any of the companies that were involved.

Despite the extensive internal review conducted through independent special counsel and a national accounting firm, there can be no assurance that the instances of inappropriate trading reported to the Boards are the only instances of such trading respecting the ING Funds.

Investments reported to the Boards that ING is committed to conducting its business with the highest standards of ethical conduct with zero tolerance for noncompliance. Accordingly, Investments advised the Boards that ING management was disappointed that its voluntary internal review identified these situations. Viewed in the context of the breadth and magnitude of its U.S. business as a whole, ING management does not believe that ING's acquired companies had systemic ethical or compliance issues in these areas. Nonetheless, Investments reported that given ING's


23



ING Prime Rate Trust

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS as of February 29, 2008 (continued)

NOTE 13 — INFORMATION REGARDING TRADING OF ING'S US MUTUAL FUNDS (continued)

refusal to tolerate any lapses, it has taken the steps noted below, and will continue to seek opportunities to further strengthen the internal controls of its affiliates.

•  ING has agreed with the ING Funds to indemnify and hold harmless the ING Funds from all damages resulting from wrongful conduct by ING or its employees or from ING's internal investigation, any investigations conducted by any governmental or self-regulatory agencies, litigation or other formal proceedings, including any proceedings by the SEC. Investments reported to the Boards that ING management believes that the total amount of any indemnification obligations will not be material to ING or its U.S. business.

•  ING updated its Code of Conduct for employees reinforcing its employees' obligation to conduct personal trading activity consistent with the law, disclosed limits, and other requirements.

Other Regulatory Matters

The New York Attorney General (the "NYAG") and other federal and state regulators are also conducting broad inquiries and investigations involving the insurance industry. These initiatives currently focus on, among other things, compensation and other sales incentives; potential conflicts of interest; potential anti-competitive activity; reinsurance; marketing practices (including suitability); specific product types (including group annuities and indexed annuities); fund selection for investment products and brokerage sales; and disclosure. It is likely that the scope of these industry investigations will further broaden before they conclude. ING has received formal and informal requests in connection with such investigations, and is cooperating fully with each request.

Other federal and state regulators could initiate similar actions in this or other areas of ING's businesses. These regulatory initiatives may result in new legislation and regulation that could significantly affect the financial services industry, including businesses in which ING is engaged. In light of these and other developments, ING continuously reviews whether modifications to its business practices are appropriate. At this time, in light of the current regulatory factors, ING U.S. is actively engaged in reviewing whether any modifications in our practices are appropriate for the future.

There can be no assurance that these matters, or the adverse publicity associated with them, will not result in increased fund redemptions, reduced sale of fund shares, or other adverse consequences to ING Funds.

NOTE 14 — SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Subsequent to February 29, 2008, the Trust paid to Common Shareholders the following dividends from net investment income:

Per Share Amount   Declaration Date   Record Date   Payable Date  
$ 0.044       2/29/08       3/10/08       3/25/08    
$ 0.042       3/31/08       4/10/08       4/22/08    

 

Subsequent to February 29, 2008, the Trust paid to Preferred Shareholders the following dividends from net investment income:

Preferred
Shares
  Total Per Share
Amount
  Auction Dates   Record Dates   Payable Dates   Average
Rate
 
Series M   $ 129.15     03/03/08-04/14/08   03/10/08-04/21/08   03/11/08-04/22/08     3.796 %  
Series T   $ 126.59     03/04/08-04/15/08   03/11/08-04/22/08   03/12/08-04/23/08     3.720 %  
Series W   $ 126.98     03/05/08-04/16/08   03/12/08-04/23/08   03/13/08-04/24/08     3.732 %  
Series Th   $ 127.56     03/06/08-04/17/08   03/13/08-04/24/08   03/14/08-04/25/08     3.673 %  
Series F   $ 124.28     03/07/08-04/18/08   03/14/08-04/25/08   03/17/08-04/28/08     3.652 %  

 


24




ING Prime Rate Trust

PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS as of February 29, 2008

Senior Loans*: 185.3%           Bank Loan
Ratings†
(Unaudited)
  Market  
Principal Amount       Borrower/Tranche Description   Moody's   S&P   Value  
Aerospace & Defense: 3.1%      
        Avio Group   NR   NR        
EUR 708,333       Term Loan, 6.425%, maturing
December 13, 2014
      $ 932,172    
$ 556,314       Term Loan, 6.510%,
maturing December 13, 2014
        478,430    
EUR 708,333       Term Loan, 7.050%,
maturing December 13, 2015
        936,880    
$ 590,346         Term Loan, 7.468%,
maturing December 13, 2015
        510,649    
        Delta Air Lines, Inc.   Ba2   BB-        
  1,417,500       Term Loan, 6.832%, maturing April 30, 2012         1,217,869    
        Delta Air Lines, Inc.   B2   B        
  2,487,500       Term Loan, 8.082%, maturing April 30, 2012         2,114,375    
        Dyncorp International, LLC   Ba2   BB        
  2,163,626
 
  Term Loan, 6.875%, maturing
February 11, 2011
 
 
   
2,001,354
   
        Hawker Beechcraft Acquisition Company, LLC   Ba3   BB        
  6,762,532
 
  Term Loan, 6.830%, maturing
March 26, 2014
 
 
   
6,278,592
   
  712,208
 
  Term Loan, 6.930%, maturing
March 26, 2014
 
 
   
661,241
   
        Hexcel Corporation   Ba1   BB+        
  582,999
 
  Term Loan, 5.862%, maturing
March 01, 2012
 
 
   
565,510
   
        McKechnie Aerospace DE, Inc.   Ba3   B+        
  995,000       Term Loan, 6.772%, maturing May 11, 2014         875,600    
        Transdigm, Inc.   Ba3   BB-        
  3,000,000       Term Loan, 6.858%, maturing June 23, 2013         2,799,999    
        United Airlines, Inc.   B1   BB-        
  2,496,357
 
  Term Loan, 6.529%, maturing
February 01, 2014
 
 
   
2,112,542
   
          US Airways Group, Inc.   B2   B+        
  6,200,000
 
  Term Loan, 5.625%, maturing
March 24, 2014
 
 
   
4,903,816
   
        Wesco Aircraft Hardware Corporation   B1   BB-        
  1,458,750
 
  Term Loan, 7.080%, maturing
September 29, 2013
 
 
   
1,369,402
   
      27,758,431    
Automobile: 3.0%      
        Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group, Inc.   B1   BB        
  746,250       Term Loan, 5.122%, maturing June 15, 2014         643,641    
        Ford Motor Company   Ba3   B+        
  1,231,281
 
  Term Loan, 8.000%, maturing
December 15, 2013
 
 
   
1,057,876
   
        Hertz Corporation   Ba1   BB+        
  2,292,468
 
  Term Loan, 5.002%, maturing
December 21, 2012
 
 
   
2,134,574
   
  570,329
 
  Term Loan, 6.660%, maturing
December 21, 2012
 
 
   
531,047
   

 

See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
25



ING Prime Rate Trust

PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS as of February 29, 2008 (continued)

            Bank Loan
Ratings†
(Unaudited)
  Market  
Principal Amount       Borrower/Tranche Description   Moody's   S&P   Value  
Automobile: (continued)      
        KAR Holdings, Inc.   Ba3   B+        
$ 4,477,500       Term Loan, 7.080%, maturing            
   
          October 20, 2013       $ 4,023,034    
          Navistar International Corporation   NR   BB-        
  1,800,000    
  Term Loan, 7.276%, maturing
January 19, 2012
        1,620,000    
          Oshkosh Truck Corporation   Ba3   BBB-        
  17,775,000
 
  Term Loan, 6.900%, maturing
December 06, 2013
        16,643,692    
        26,653,864    
Beverage, Food & Tobacco: 4.4%      
        Advance Food Company   B1   BB-        
  50,090
 
  Term Loan, 2.364%, maturing
March 16, 2014
 
 
   
42,076
   
  580,005
 
  Term Loan, 6.580%, maturing
March 16, 2014
 
 
   
487,204
   
        ARAMARK Corporation   Ba3   BB        
  2,970,000
 
  Term Loan, 6.705%, maturing
January 26, 2014
 
 
   
2,757,205
   
  16,822,496
 
  Term Loan, 6.705%, maturing
January 26, 2014
 
 
   
15,617,198
   
  1,447,943
 
  Term Loan, 7.223%, maturing
January 26, 2014
 
 
   
1,344,201
   
        Birds Eye Foods, Inc.   B1   B+        
  859,167
 
  Term Loan, 6.580%, maturing
March 22, 2013
 
 
   
762,510
   
        Bumble Bee Foods, LLC   B1   B+        
  1,200,000       Term Loan, 5.521%, maturing May 02, 2012         1,116,000    
        Golden State Foods   B1   B+        
  3,850,000
 
  Term Loan, 4.994%, maturing
February 28, 2011
 
 
   
3,763,375
   
        Iglo Birds Eye   NR   NR        
EUR 51,247       Term Loan, 7.018%, maturing
October 25, 2014
        70,569    
EUR 380,330       Term Loan, 7.018%, maturing
October 27, 2014
        523,732    
EUR 568,424       Term Loan, 7.018%, maturing
October 27, 2014
        782,747    
EUR 51,247       Term Loan, 7.393%, maturing
October 25, 2015
        70,930    
EUR 380,330       Term Loan, 7.393%, maturing
October 27, 2015
        523,732    
EUR 568,424       Term Loan, 7.393%, maturing
October 27, 2015
        786,755    
        Pinnacle Foods Holding Corporation   B2   B        
$ 5,671,500       Term Loan, 7.483%, maturing April 02, 2014         5,013,963    
        Sturm Foods, Inc.   B1   B        
  2,977,500
 
  Term Loan, 5.813%, maturing
January 31, 2014
        2,243,049    

 

See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
26



ING Prime Rate Trust

PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS as of February 29, 2008 (continued)

            Bank Loan
Ratings†
(Unaudited)
  Market  
Principal Amount       Borrower/Tranche Description   Moody's   S&P   Value  
Beverage, Food & Tobacco: (continued)      
        United Biscuits   NR   NR        
GBP 1,476,692       Term Loan, 7.962%, maturing            
   
          December 14, 2014       $ 2,566,025    
          Van Houtte, Inc.   B1   BB-        
$ 89,550       Term Loan, 7.330%, maturing July 19, 2014         83,282    
  656,700       Term Loan, 7.330%, maturing July 19, 2014         610,731    
      39,165,284    
Buildings & Real Estate: 3.0%      
        Capital Automotive, L.P.   Ba1   BB+        
  9,913,155
 
  Term Loan, 5.020%, maturing
December 16, 2010
 
 
   
9,257,092
   
        Contech Construction Products, Inc.   Ba3   BB        
  1,715,972
 
  Term Loan, 5.191%, maturing
January 31, 2013
 
 
   
1,501,476
   
        Custom Building Products, Inc.   B1   BB-        
  4,288,276
 
  Term Loan, 6.977%, maturing
October 29, 2011
 
 
   
3,816,566
   
        Headwaters, Inc.   Ba2   BB+        
  1,830,256       Term Loan, 6.808%, maturing April 30, 2011         1,747,894    
        John Maneely Company   B3   B+        
  4,268,161
 
  Term Loan, 7.461%, maturing
December 08, 2013
 
 
   
3,723,971
   
        KCPC Acquisition, Inc.   Ba2   B        
  562,196       Term Loan, 5.318%, maturing May 22, 2014         500,354    
  189,655       Term Loan, 7.000%, maturing May 22, 2014         168,793    
        LaFarge Roofing   NR   NR        
EUR 441,573       Term Loan, 6.890%, maturing June 14, 2015         475,736    
EUR 180,337       Term Loan, 6.890%, maturing June 14, 2015         194,289    
$ 169,425       Term Loan, 6.955%, maturing June 14, 2015         120,150    
EUR 409,551       Term Loan, 7.140%, maturing
March 14, 2016
        453,680    
EUR 210,674       Term Loan, 7.140%, maturing
March 14, 2016
        233,374    
$ 171,654       Term Loan, 7.205%, maturing
March 14, 2016
        125,164    
        Nortek, Inc.   Ba2   B+        
  2,472,064
 
  Term Loan, 5.350%, maturing
August 27, 2011
        2,144,515    
        Ply Gem Industries, Inc.   B1   BB-        
  428,571
 
  Revolver, 2.799%, maturing
February 12, 2009
        353,571    
        Shea Capital I, LLC   Ba3   BB-        
  553,535
 
  Term Loan, 6.828%, maturing
October 27, 2011
        426,222    
        Tishman Speyer   Ba2   BB-        
  1,500,000
 
  Term Loan, 4.920%, maturing
December 27, 2012
        1,275,000    
      26,517,847    

 

See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
27



ING Prime Rate Trust

PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS as of February 29, 2008 (continued)

            Bank Loan
Ratings†
(Unaudited)
  Market  
Principal Amount       Borrower/Tranche Description   Moody's   S&P   Value  
Cargo Transport: 2.2%      
        Baker Tanks, Inc.   B1   B        
$ 1,985,000       Term Loan, 5.333%, maturing May 08, 2014       $ 1,836,125    
        Dockwise Transport, N.V.   NR   NR        
  1,094,819
 
  Term Loan, 7.205%, maturing
January 11, 2015
 
 
   
952,493
   
  875,000
 
  Term Loan, 7.205%, maturing
January 11, 2015
 
 
   
761,250
   
  875,000
 
  Term Loan, 7.705%, maturing
January 11, 2016
 
 
   
764,166
   
  1,094,819
 
  Term Loan, 7.705%, maturing
January 11, 2016
 
 
   
956,142
   
  500,000       Term Loan, 9.330%, maturing July 11, 2016         460,000    
  560,000
 
  Term Loan, 9.330%, maturing
October 20, 2016
 
 
   
515,200
   
        Gainey Corporation   Caa1   B-        
  755,528       Term Loan, 10.000%, maturing April 20, 2012         498,648    
        Greatwide Logistics Services, Inc.   B3   B        
  2,970,000
 
  Term Loan, 8.330%, maturing
December 19, 2013
 
 
   
2,361,150
   
        Inmar, Inc.   B1   B        
  570,688       Term Loan, 7.330%, maturing April 29, 2013         496,498    
        Kenan Advantage Group, Inc.   B3   B+        
  980,010
 
  Term Loan, 7.580%, maturing
December 16, 2011
 
 
   
891,809
   
          (2 )   Neoplan USA Corporation   NR   NR        
  953,221       (3 )   Term Loan, 11.008%, maturing June 30, 2006         88,406    
        Railamerica Transportation Corporation   NR   NR        
  4,200,000
 
  Term Loan, 5.320%, maturing
August 14, 2008
 
 
   
3,969,000
   
        TNT Logistics   Ba2   BB-        
  1,907,611
 
  Term Loan, 6.122%, maturing
November 04, 2013
 
 
   
1,721,619
   
  723,070
 
  Term Loan, 7.830%, maturing
November 04, 2013
 
 
   
667,032
   
        US Shipping Partners, L.P.   B3   B        
  2,802,377       Term Loan, 8.330%, maturing March 31, 2012         2,276,931    
      19,216,469    
Cellular: 2.9%      
        Alltel Communications, Inc.   Ba3   BB-        
  3,739,375       Term Loan, 5.866%, maturing May 16, 2015         3,401,769    
  2,000,000       Term Loan, 4.991% maturing May 16, 2015         1,819,432    
        Centennial Communications Corporation   Ba2   BB-        
  10,085,631
 
  Term Loan, 6.705%, maturing
February 09, 2011
 
 
   
9,641,863
   
        Cricket Communications, Inc.   Ba2   B+        
  5,910,000       Term Loan, 7.830%, maturing June 16, 2013         5,660,468    
        NTELOS, Inc.   Ba3   BB-        
  4,322,237
 
  Term Loan, 5.271%, maturing
August 24, 2011
 
 
    4,122,333    

 

See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
28



ING Prime Rate Trust

PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS as of February 29, 2008 (continued)

            Bank Loan
Ratings†
(Unaudited)
  Market  
Principal Amount       Borrower/Tranche Description   Moody's   S&P   Value  
Cellular: (continued)      
        Telepak, Inc. / Cellular South   Ba3   B+        
$ 1,488,833       Term Loan, 4.665%, maturing May 29, 2014       $ 1,384,615    
      26,030,480    
Chemicals, Plastics & Rubber: 8.1%      
        AZ Chem US, Inc.   B1   BB-        
EUR 753,893       Term Loan, 6.996%, maturing
February 28, 2013
        937,726    
        AZ Chem US, Inc.   Caa1   CCC+        
$ 333,333       Term Loan, 8.590%, maturing
February 28, 2014
        200,000    
        Borsodchem Nyrt.   NR   NR        
EUR 804,394       Term Loan, 6.593%, maturing
March 26, 2015
        1,066,227    
EUR 804,394       Term Loan, 7.075%, maturing
March 26, 2016
        1,072,337    
        Brenntag Holding GmbH & Co. KG   B1   B+        
$ 1,178,182       Term Loan, 5.794%, maturing
January 17, 2014
        1,025,755    
  3,621,818
 
  Term Loan, 5.794%, maturing
January 17, 2014
        3,153,245    
        Celanese   Ba3   BB+        
  3,200,000       Term Loan, 3.144%, maturing April 02, 2014         3,000,445    
  6,947,500       Term Loan, 6.479%, maturing April 02, 2014         6,514,247    
        Cristal Inorganic Chemicals, Inc.   Ba3   BB-        
  2,900,000       Term Loan, 7.080%, maturing May 15, 2014         2,320,000    
        Cristal Inorganic Chemicals, Inc.   B3   CCC+        
  900,000
 
  Term Loan, 10.580%, maturing
November 15, 2014
 
 
   
616,500
   
        Flint Group   NR   NR        
  936,821
 
  Term Loan, 7.393%, maturing
December 31, 2012
 
 
   
815,034
   
  353,279
 
  Term Loan, 7.393%, maturing
December 31, 2014
 
 
   
307,353
   
EUR 666,667       Term Loan, 7.002%, maturing May 29, 2015         886,200    
$ 2,333,333       Term Loan, 7.393%, maturing May 29, 2015         2,030,000    
  1,290,100
 
  Term Loan, 7.393%, maturing
December 31, 2015
 
 
   
1,128,838
   
        Hawkeye Renewables, LLC   B3   NR        
  3,693,750       Term Loan, 7.234%, maturing June 30, 2012         2,677,969    
        Hexion Specialty Chemicals, Inc.   Ba3   B+        
  2,468,750       Term Loan, 5.375%, maturing May 05, 2013         2,273,993    
  7,846,851       Term Loan, 7.000%, maturing May 05, 2013         7,227,820    
  1,703,188       Term Loan, 7.125%, maturing May 05, 2013         1,568,825    
  995,000       Term Loan, 7.125%, maturing May 05, 2013         916,505    
  1,176,000       Term Loan, 7.474%, maturing May 05, 2013         1,083,227    
        Ineos US Finance, LLC   Ba3   BB-        
  2,150,615
 
  Term Loan, 7.357%, maturing
December 16, 2012
 
 
    1,835,416    

 

See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
29



ING Prime Rate Trust

PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS as of February 29, 2008 (continued)

            Bank Loan
Ratings†
(Unaudited)
  Market  
Principal Amount       Borrower/Tranche Description   Moody's   S&P   Value  
Chemicals, Plastics & Rubber: (continued)      
$ 2,854,474       Term Loan, 7.357%, maturing        
   
        December 16, 2013       $ 2,538,341    
  2,853,691
 
  Term Loan, 7.857%, maturing
December 16, 2014
 
 
    2,537,645    
        ISP Chemco, Inc.   Ba3   BB-        
  3,482,500       Term Loan, 5.294%, maturing June 04, 2014         3,149,486    
        JohnsonDiversey, Inc.   Ba2   BB-        
  503,580
 
  Term Loan, 5.112%, maturing
December 16, 2010
 
 
    472,946    
  2,612,396
 
  Term Loan, 5.112%, maturing
December 16, 2011
 
 
    2,453,476    
        Kraton Polymers, LLC   Ba3   B+        
  1,582,434       Term Loan, 6.750%, maturing May 12, 2013         1,388,586    
        Lucite International US Finco, Ltd.   Ba3   BB-        
  1,032,977       Term Loan, 5.500%, maturing July 07, 2013         890,943    
  701,155       Term Loan, 5.500%, maturing July 07, 2013         604,746    
        MacDermid, Inc.   B1   BB-        
  1,698,375       Term Loan, 6.830%, maturing April 12, 2014         1,426,635    
EUR 832,042       Term Loan, 7.021%, maturing April 12, 2014         1,011,231    
        Northeast Biofuels, LLC   B1   B+        
$ 1,073,171       Term Loan, 8.080%, maturing June 30, 2013         965,854    
        Polypore, Inc.   Ba3   BB-        
  3,316,666       Term Loan, 5.370%, maturing July 03, 2014         2,918,666    
        Rockwood Specialties Group, Inc.   Ba2   BB+        
  9,725,235
 
  Term Loan, 4.744%, maturing
December 13, 2013
 
 
   
9,161,978
   
      72,178,195    
Containers, Packaging & Glass: 5.3%      
        Berry Plastics Corporation   B1   BB-        
  9,941,169       Term Loan, 5.095%, maturing April 03, 2015         8,626,449    
        Graham Packaging Company   B1   B+        
  13,101,000
 
  Term Loan, 7.253%, maturing
October 07, 2011
 
 
   
11,944,837
   
        Graphic Packaging International, Inc.   Ba2   BB-        
  7,866,343       Term Loan, 6.032%, maturing May 16, 2014         7,085,168    
        Klockner Pentaplast   NR   NR        
  2,000,000
 
  Term Loan, 7.043%, maturing
January 03, 2016
 
 
   
1,485,000
   
EUR 1,019,453       Term Loan, 7.116%, maturing
January 03, 2016
        1,113,167    
EUR 480,547       Term Loan, 7.116%, maturing
January 03, 2016
        524,721    
        Mauser AG   NR   NR        
EUR 625,000       Term Loan, 6.561%, maturing June 13, 2013         699,070    
EUR 625,000       Term Loan, 6.811%, maturing June 13, 2014         703,817    
$ 842,699       Term Loan, 5.498%, maturing June 13, 2015         620,437    
  842,699       Term Loan, 5.748%, maturing June 13, 2016         624,651    
        Owens-Illinois   Ba2   BBB-        
EUR 2,154,375       Term Loan, 5.677%, maturing June 14, 2013         2,929,270    

 

See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
30



ING Prime Rate Trust

PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS as of February 29, 2008 (continued)

            Bank Loan
Ratings†
(Unaudited)
  Market  
Principal Amount       Borrower/Tranche Description   Moody's   S&P   Value  
Containers, Packaging & Glass: (continued)      
        Pro Mach, Inc.   B1   B        
$ 2,456,250       Term Loan, 7.080%, maturing        
   
        December 01, 2011       $ 2,296,594    
        Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation   Ba2   BB        
  1,575,522
 
  Term Loan, 6.638%, maturing
November 01, 2011
 
 
   
1,494,974
   
  3,126,468
 
  Term Loan, 6.704%, maturing
November 01, 2011
 
 
   
2,968,841
   
        Tegrant Holding Company   B2   BB-        
  496,250
 
  Term Loan, 7.600%, maturing
March 08, 2014
 
 
   
357,300
   
        Tegrant Holding Company   Caa2   CCC+        
  500,000
 
  Term Loan, 10.350%, maturing
March 08, 2015
 
 
   
247,500
   
        Xerium Technologies, Inc.   B2   B+        
  4,247,314       Term Loan, 7.580%, maturing May 18, 2012         3,684,545    
      47,406,341    
Data and Internet Services: 9.4%      
        Activant Solutions, Inc.   B1   B+        
  930,897       Term Loan, 6.771%, maturing May 02, 2013         800,572    
        Acxiom Corporation   Ba2   BB+        
  1,741,667
 
  Term Loan, 5.840%, maturing
September 15, 2012
 
 
   
1,584,917
   
        Amadeus IT Group, S.A.   NR   NR        
EUR 768,581       Term Loan, 6.959%, maturing May 04, 2015         998,322    
EUR 768,581       Term Loan, 7.209%, maturing May 04, 2016         1,004,403    
        Audatex   B1   BB-        
$ 3,105,857       Term Loan, 7.063%, maturing May 16, 2014         2,764,213    
        Carlson Wagonlit Holdings, B.V.   Ba2   BB-        
  2,750,000
 
  Term Loan, 5.501%, maturing
August 03, 2012
 
 
   
2,392,500
   
        First Data Corporation   Ba3   BB-        
  4,485,681
 
  Term Loan, 7.630%, maturing
September 24, 2014
 
 
   
4,088,824
   
  249,375
 
  Term Loan, 7.630%, maturing
September 24, 2014
 
 
   
227,498
   
  2,198,337
 
  Term Loan, 7.630%, maturing
September 30, 2014
 
 
   
2,004,059
   
        Open Text Corporation   Ba3   BB        
  1,325,972
 
  Term Loan, 5.372%, maturing
October 02, 2013
 
 
   
1,277,905
   
        Orbitz   B1   BB-        
  10,473,750       Term Loan, 6.965%, maturing July 25, 2014         9,164,531    
        Reynolds & Reynolds Company   Ba2   BB        
  9,957,012
 
  Term Loan, 6.843%, maturing
October 26, 2012
 
 
   
8,762,171
   
        Sabre, Inc.   B1   B+        
  15,958,689
 
  Term Loan, 5.244%, maturing
September 30, 2014
 
 
   
13,309,179
   

 

See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
31



ING Prime Rate Trust

PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS as of February 29, 2008 (continued)

            Bank Loan
Ratings†
(Unaudited)
  Market  
Principal Amount       Borrower/Tranche Description   Moody's   S&P   Value  
Data and Internet Services: (continued)  
        Sitel, LLC   B2   B+        
$ 3,893,842       Term Loan, 5.900%, maturing        
   
        January 30, 2014       $ 3,134,543    
        Sungard Data Systems, Inc.   Ba3   BB        
  28,249,874
 
  Term Loan, 5.128%, maturing
February 28, 2014
 
 
   
26,170,853
   
        Transaction Network Services, Inc.   B1   BB-        
  2,310,780
 
  Term Loan, 7.479%, maturing
March 28, 2014
 
 
   
2,114,364
   
        Travelport, Inc.   Ba3   BB-        
  289,971
 
  Term Loan, 7.080%, maturing
August 23, 2013
 
 
   
256,036
   
  1,445,156
 
  Term Loan, 7.080%, maturing
August 23, 2013
 
 
   
1,276,028
   
  995,000       Term Loan, 7.080%, maturing May 23, 2014         877,777    
        Verifone, Inc.   B1   BB        
  1,057,500
 
  Term Loan, 5.250%, maturing
October 31, 2013
 
 
   
983,475
   
      83,192,170    
Diversified / Conglomerate Manufacturing: 3.9%      
        BOC Edwards   B1   BB        
  2,238,750       Term Loan, 5.085%, maturing May 31, 2014         1,499,963    
        Brand Services, Inc.   B1   B        
  2,851,721
 
  Term Loan, 6.971%, maturing
February 07, 2014
 
 
   
2,680,617
   
  1,246,875
 
  Term Loan, 8.125%, maturing
February 07, 2014
 
 
   
1,172,063
   
        Brand Services, Inc.   Caa1   CCC+        
  1,600,000
 
  Term Loan, 9.238%, maturing
February 07, 2015
 
 
   
1,458,000
   
        Dresser, Inc.   B2   B+        
  4,910,577       Term Loan, 5.566%, maturing May 04, 2014         4,552,105    
        EPD, Inc.   B1   B+        
  437,500       Term Loan, 5.630%, maturing July 31, 2014         363,672    
  3,054,844       Term Loan, 5.750%, maturing July 31, 2014         2,539,339    
        Ferretti, S.P.A   NR   NR        
EUR 600,000       Term Loan, 4.715%, maturing
January 21, 2008
        785,275    
EUR 600,000       Term Loan, 4.715%, maturing
January 22, 2008
        780,717    
        Flextronics International, Ltd.   Ba1   BB+        
$ 691,825       Term Loan, 7.394%, maturing
October 01, 2014
        646,280    
  198,322
 
  Term Loan, 7.455%, maturing
October 01, 2014
 
 
    185,266    
        Generac Power Systems, Inc.   B1   B        
  4,410,000
 
  Term Loan, 7.203%, maturing
November 09, 2013
 
 
    3,679,201    
        Gentek Holding Corporation   Ba3   BB-        
  382,635
 
  Term Loan, 6.330%, maturing
February 28, 2011
 
 
    353,459    

 

See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
32



ING Prime Rate Trust

PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS as of February 29, 2008 (continued)

            Bank Loan
Ratings†
(Unaudited)
  Market  
Principal Amount       Borrower/Tranche Description   Moody's   S&P   Value  
Diversified / Conglomerate Manufacturing: (continued)  
$ 2,134,193       Term Loan, 6.347%, maturing        
   
        February 28, 2011       $ 1,971,461    
        Mueller Group, Inc.   Ba3   BB+        
  3,757,345       Term Loan, 5.129%, maturing May 24, 2014         3,437,971    
        Norcross Safety Products, LLC   Ba1   BB        
  960,980       Term Loan, 5.125%, maturing June 30, 2012         893,712    
        Rexnord Corporation / RBS Global, Inc.   Ba2   BB-        
  968,485       Term Loan, 7.401%, maturing July 19, 2013         878,900    
        Sensata Technologies   Ba3   BB        
  4,137,000       Term Loan, 5.056%, maturing April 27, 2013         3,540,089    
        Sensus Metering Systems, Inc.   Ba3   BB        
  1,495,652
 
  Term Loan, 5.763%, maturing
December 17, 2010
 
 
   
1,346,087
   
  97,174
 
  Term Loan, 6.878%, maturing
December 17, 2010
 
 
   
87,457
   
        Springs Window Fashions, LLC   B1   B+        
  1,434,427
 
  Term Loan, 7.625%, maturing
December 31, 2012
 
 
   
1,032,788
   
        Textron Fastening Systems   B2   B+        
  493,750
 
  Term Loan, 8.330%, maturing
August 11, 2013
 
 
   
459,188
   
      34,343,610    
Diversified / Conglomerate Service: 4.4%      
        Affinion Group   Ba2   BB        
  3,937,668
 
  Term Loan, 5.572%, maturing
October 17, 2012
 
 
   
3,629,219
   
        AlixPartners, LLP   B1   BB-        
  2,648,250
 
  Term Loan, 6.380%, maturing
October 12, 2013
 
 
   
2,449,631
   
        Brickman Group   Ba3   BB-        
  1,985,000
 
  Term Loan, 7.143%, maturing
January 23, 2014
 
 
   
1,816,275
   
        Brock Holdings, Inc.   B1   B        
  1,488,750
 
  Term Loan, 7.142%, maturing
February 26, 2014
 
 
   
1,317,544
   
        Catalina Marketing Corporation   Ba3   BB-        
  2,992,500
 
  Term Loan, 7.830%, maturing
October 01, 2014
 
 
   
2,748,112
   
        Coach America Holdings, Inc.   B2   B        
  1,714,701       Term Loan, 6.200%, maturing April 20, 2014         1,144,563    
  442,989       Term Loan, 7.680%, maturing April 20, 2014         295,695    
 
   
  Fleetcor Technologies Operating
Company, LLC
 
Ba3
 
B+
   
   
  578,958
 
  Term Loan, 5.511%, maturing
April 30, 2013
 
 
   
523,957
   
        Intergraph Corporation   Ba3   BB-        
  1,884,107       Term Loan, 5.092%, maturing May 29, 2014         1,723,958    
        ISS Global A/S   NR   NR        
EUR 122,807       Term Loan, 6.949%, maturing        
   
        December 31, 2013         164,035    

 

See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
33



ING Prime Rate Trust

PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS as of February 29, 2008 (continued)

            Bank Loan
Ratings†
(Unaudited)
  Market  
Principal Amount       Borrower/Tranche Description   Moody's   S&P   Value  
Diversified / Conglomerate Service: (continued)  
EUR 877,193       Term Loan, 6.949%, maturing        
   
        December 31, 2013       $ 1,171,675    
        ISTA International GmbH   NR   NR        
EUR 1,668,522       Term Loan, 6.769%, maturing June 30, 2015         2,105,168    
EUR 331,478       Term Loan, 6.769%, maturing June 30, 2015         418,224    
        Mitchell International, Inc.   Ba3   B+        
$ 446,625       Term Loan, 6.843%, maturing        
   
        March 28, 2014         395,263    
        Mitchell International, Inc.   Caa1   B+        
  250,000
 
  Term Loan, 10.125%, maturing
March 28, 2015
 
 
   
210,000
   
        Valley National Gases, Inc.   Ba3   BB-        
  1,965,879
    Term Loan, 6.741%, maturing
February 28, 2014
 
     
1,670,997
   
        Valley National Gases, Inc.   B3   CCC+        
  250,000
 
  Term Loan, 9.122%, maturing
August 28, 2014
 
 
   
212,500
   
        Valleycrest Companies, LLC   B1   B+        
  1,981,898
 
  Term Loan, 7.131%, maturing
October 04, 2013
 
 
   
1,744,071
   
        Vertafore, Inc.   B1   B        
  3,076,808
 
  Term Loan, 5.593%, maturing
January 31, 2012
 
 
   
2,861,432
   
        West Corporation   B1   BB-        
  14,417,803
 
  Term Loan, 5.744%, maturing
October 24, 2013
 
 
   
12,338,035
   
      38,940,354    
Diversified Nat'l Rsrcs, Precious Metals & Minerals: 3.6%      
        Georgia Pacific Corporation   Ba2   BB+        
  34,692,011
 
  Term Loan, 6.696%, maturing
December 20, 2012
 
 
   
32,064,091
   
      32,064,091    
Ecological: 0.4%      
        Allied Waste North America, Inc.   Ba3   BBB-        
  572,651
 
  Term Loan, 4.599%, maturing
January 15, 2012
 
 
   
539,455
   
  629,351
 
  Term Loan, 6.000%, maturing
January 15, 2012
 
 
   
592,868
   
        IESI Corporation   B1   BB+        
  1,800,000
 
  Term Loan, 6.610%, maturing
January 21, 2012
 
 
   
1,656,000
   
        Synagro Technologies, Inc.   Ba3   BB-        
  895,500       Term Loan, 5.088%, maturing April 02, 2014         754,459    
        Synagro Technologies, Inc.   Caa1   B-        
  485,000
 
  Term Loan, 7.820%, maturing
October 02, 2014
 
 
   
380,725
   
      3,923,507    
Electronics: 1.6%      
        Decision One   NR   NR        
  1,674,773
    Term Loan, 12.000%, maturing
April 15, 2010
 
 
   
1,507,296
   

 

See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
34



ING Prime Rate Trust

PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS as of February 29, 2008 (continued)

            Bank Loan
Ratings†
(Unaudited)
  Market  
Principal Amount       Borrower/Tranche Description   Moody's   S&P   Value  
Electronics: (continued)  
        Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.   Ba1   BB        
$ 4,100,503       Term Loan, 5.014%, maturing        
   
        December 01, 2013       $ 3,498,241    
        Infor Global Solutions   B1   B+        
  494,761       Term Loan, 7.580%, maturing July 28, 2012         426,355    
EUR 742,500       Term Loan, 7.771%, maturing July 28, 2012         902,405    
$ 106,069       Term Loan, 8.580%, maturing July 28, 2012         95,992    
  203,298
 
  Term Loan, 8.580%, maturing
March 02, 2014
 
 
   
183,985
   
        Infor Global Solutions   Caa2   CCC+        
EUR 500,000       Term Loan, 10.976%, maturing        
   
        March 02, 2014         603,882    
        Kronos, Inc.   Ba3   B+        
$ 2,469,643       Term Loan, 7.080%, maturing June 11, 2014         2,009,672    
        NXP, B.V.   Ba3   BB-        
  1,750,000
    Floating Rate Note, 7.008%, maturing
October 15, 2013
 
 
   
1,413,125
   
EUR 1,500,000         Floating Rate Note, 7.326%, maturing        
   
        October 15, 2013         1,754,676    
        ON Semiconductor   Ba1   BB        
$ 1,985,000       Term Loan, 6.580%, maturing        
   
        September 03, 2013         1,766,650    
      14,162,279    
Finance: 1.6%      
        LPL Holdings, Inc.   B1   B        
  7,449,969       Term Loan, 6.830%, maturing June 28, 2013         6,649,097    
        Rent-A-Center, Inc.   Ba2   BB+        
  2,411,071       Term Loan, 5.766%, maturing June 30, 2012         2,209,144    
        Riskmetrics   Ba3   BB        
  1,389,500
 
  Term Loan, 7.080%, maturing
January 11, 2014
 
 
   
1,321,762
   
        TD Ameritrade Holding Corporation   Ba1   BB        
  3,834,062
 
  Term Loan, 4.620%, maturing
December 31, 2012
 
 
   
3,601,357
   
      13,781,360    
Foreign Cable, Foreign TV, Radio and Equipment: 7.1%      
        Casema Bidco/Serpering Investments, B.V.   NR   NR        
EUR 548,444       Term Loan, 6.685%, maturing
November 14, 2014
        771,401    
EUR 284,889       Term Loan, 6.685%, maturing
November 14, 2014
        400,704    
EUR 583,333       Term Loan, 6.685%, maturing
November 14, 2014
        820,473    
EUR 583,333       Term Loan, 7.185%, maturing
November 14, 2015
        824,413    
EUR 833,333       Term Loan, 7.185%, maturing
November 14, 2015
        1,177,732    
        Com Hem   NR   NR        
SEK 8,666,667       Term Loan, 7.030%, maturing
January 31, 2014
        1,263,127    

 

See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
35



ING Prime Rate Trust

PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS as of February 29, 2008 (continued)

            Bank Loan
Ratings†
(Unaudited)
  Market  
Principal Amount       Borrower/Tranche Description   Moody's   S&P   Value  
Foreign Cable, Foreign TV, Radio and Equipment: (continued)  
SEK 8,000,000       Term Loan, 7.155%, maturing        
   
        January 31, 2015       $ 1,165,963    
        Levana Holding 4 GmbH   NR   NR        
EUR 1,081,359       Term Loan, 6.770%, maturing
March 02, 2015
        1,161,696    
EUR 1,081,359       Term Loan, 7.284%, maturing
March 02, 2016
        1,169,910    
        Numericable/YPSO France SAS   NR   NR        
EUR 765,871       Term Loan, 6.054%, maturing July 28, 2016         962,079    
EUR 1,249,580       Term Loan, 6.679%, maturing July 28, 2016         1,569,708    
EUR 1,984,549       Term Loan, 6.679%, maturing July 28, 2016         2,492,968    
EUR 1,305,125       Term Loan, 6.929%, maturing July 28, 2016         1,656,832    
EUR 694,875       Term Loan, 6.929%, maturing July 28, 2016         882,131    
        ProSiebenSat.1 Media AG   NR   NR        
EUR 64,583       Term Loan, 6.123%, maturing July 02, 2014         79,768    
EUR 1,190,021       Term Loan, 6.123%, maturing July 02, 2014         1,469,806    
SEK 2,269,914       Term Loan, 6.223%, maturing July 02, 2014         299,682    
EUR 122,161       Term Loan, 6.248%, maturing May 09, 2015         132,164    
EUR 2,715,121       Term Loan, 6.248%, maturing May 09, 2015         3,405,783    
        TDF, S.A.   NR   NR        
EUR 1,000,000       Term Loan, 6.185%, maturing
January 31, 2015
        1,212,943    
EUR 1,000,000       Term Loan, 6.645%, maturing
January 31, 2016
        1,219,850    
        UPC Financing Partnership   Ba3   B+        
$ 5,000,000       Term Loan, 5.014%, maturing
December 31, 2014
        4,407,815    
EUR 1,741,434       Term Loan, 6.193%, maturing
December 31, 2014
        2,288,983    
EUR 12,401,899       Term Loan, 6.193%, maturing
December 31, 2014
        16,301,358    
        Virgin Media Investment Holdings, Ltd.   Ba2   BB        
GBP 3,928,977       Term Loan, 7.657%, maturing
September 03, 2012
        7,203,207    
GBP 3,361,428       Term Loan, 7.657%, maturing
September 03, 2012
        6,162,689    
GBP 828,509       Term Loan, 7.680%, maturing
September 03, 2012
        1,518,950    
GBP 421,274       Term Loan, 7.680%, maturing
September 03, 2012
        772,346    
      62,794,481    
Gaming: 4.7%      
        Cannery Casino Resorts, LLC   B2   BB        
$ 590,551       Term Loan, 4.025%, maturing May 18, 2013         553,641    
  1,645,276       Term Loan, 5.320%, maturing May 18, 2013         1,542,446    
        CCM Merger, Inc.   Ba3   BB-        
  3,384,049       Term Loan, 6.519%, maturing July 13, 2012         2,944,122    
        Centaur, LLC   B1   BB-        
  1,649,123
    Term Loan, 8.830%, maturing
October 30, 2012
 
      1,442,982    

 

See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
36



ING Prime Rate Trust

PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS as of February 29, 2008 (continued)

            Bank Loan
Ratings†
(Unaudited)
  Market  
Principal Amount       Borrower/Tranche Description   Moody's   S&P   Value  
Gaming: (continued)  
        Fontainebleau Las Vegas, LLC   B1   B+        
$ 1,933,333       Term Loan, 8.400%, maturing June 06, 2014       $ 1,614,333    
        Golden Nugget, Inc.   B1   BB-        
  954,545       Term Loan, 5.125%, maturing June 30, 2014         830,455    
        Green Valley Ranch Gaming, LLC   B1   BB-        
  1,434,205
 
  Term Loan, 5.740%, maturing
February 16, 2014
 
 
   
1,168,877
   
        Green Valley Ranch Gaming, LLC   Caa1   CCC+        
  750,000
 
  Term Loan, 6.335%, maturing
August 16, 2014
 
 
   
573,750
   
        Greenwood Racing, Inc.   B2   BB-        
  1,485,000
 
  Term Loan, 5.380%, maturing
November 28, 2011
 
 
   
1,373,625
   
        Harrahs Operating Company, Inc   Ba2   BB        
  2,000,000
 
  Term Loan, 6.244%, maturing
January 28, 2015
 
 
   
1,836,608
   
        Isle Of Capri Casinos, Inc.   Ba3   BB+        
  1,324,622
 
  Term Loan, 4.875%, maturing
November 25, 2013
 
 
   
1,146,901
   
  4,393,328
 
  Term Loan, 6.580%, maturing
November 25, 2013
 
 
   
3,803,889
   
  1,757,331
 
  Term Loan, 6.580%, maturing
November 25, 2013
 
 
   
1,521,556
   
        Las Vegas Sands, LLC   Ba3   BB        
  6,368,000       Term Loan, 6.580%, maturing May 23, 2014         5,688,082    
        New World Gaming Partners, Ltd.   Ba3   BB-        
  708,333
 
  Term Loan, 7.229%, maturing
September 30, 2014
 
 
   
605,625
   
  3,541,667
 
  Term Loan, 7.229%, maturing
September 30, 2014
 
 
   
3,028,125
   
        Penn National Gaming, Inc.   Ba2   BBB-        
  1,500,000
 
  Term Loan, 4.959%, maturing
October 03, 2012
 
 
   
1,430,454
   
        Riviera Holdings Corporation   B2   BB-        
  500,000       Term Loan, 5.130%, maturing June 08, 2014         455,000    
        Seminole Tribe Of Florida   Baa3   BBB        
  16,791
 
  Term Loan, 6.688%, maturing
March 05, 2014
 
 
   
15,909
   
        Tropicana Entertainment — Landco   B3   B-        
  3,750,000       Term Loan, 5.372%, maturing July 03, 2008         3,576,563    
        VML US Finance, LLC   B1   BB-        
  1,600,000       Term Loan, 7.080%, maturing May 26, 2012         1,454,182    
  3,200,000       Term Loan, 7.080%, maturing May 25, 2013         2,908,365    
  2,000,000       Term Loan, 7.080%, maturing May 26, 2013         1,817,728    
      41,333,218    
Grocery: 0.1%      
        Roundys Supermarkets, Inc.   Ba3   B+        
  1,131,970
    Term Loan, 5.910%, maturing
November 03, 2011
 
     
1,063,345
   
      1,063,345    

 

See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
37



ING Prime Rate Trust

PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS as of February 29, 2008 (continued)

            Bank Loan
Ratings†
(Unaudited)
  Market  
Principal Amount       Borrower/Tranche Description   Moody's   S&P   Value  
Healthcare, Education and Childcare: 22.0%  
    Accellent, Inc.   B2   BB-        
$ 1,960,000       Term Loan, 5.839%, maturing        
   
    November 22, 2012       $ 1,664,367    
    Advanced Medical Optics, Inc.   Ba2   BB-        
  992,500       Term Loan, 6.631%, maturing April 02, 2014         880,844    
    AGA Medical Corporation   B1   BB-        
  1,632,209       Term Loan, 5.150%, maturing April 28, 2013         1,460,827    
    AMN Healthcare, Inc.   Ba2   BB-        
  565,818
 
  Term Loan, 6.580%, maturing
November 02, 2011
 
 
   
512,065
   
    Catalent Pharma Solutions   Ba3   BB-        
  6,544,889       Term Loan, 7.080%, maturing April 10, 2014         5,481,344    
    CHG Medical Staffing, Inc.   Ba3   B+        
  400,000       Term Loan, 7.210%, maturing June 20, 2012         378,000    
  1,584,000
 
  Term Loan, 6.342%, maturing
December 20, 2012
 
 
   
1,496,880
   
    CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc.   Ba3   BB        
  52,591,647       Term Loan, 5.335%, maturing July 25, 2014         48,230,906    
    Concentra Operating Corporation   B1   B+        
  1,990,000       Term Loan, 7.080%, maturing June 25, 2014         1,671,600    
    CRC Health Corporation   Ba3   BB-        
  1,453,315
 
  Term Loan, 7.093%, maturing
February 06, 2013
 
 
   
1,307,075
   
  1,473,844
 
  Term Loan, 7.448%, maturing
February 06, 2013
 
 
   
1,325,538
   
    Davita, Inc.   Ba1   BB+        
  9,999,946
 
  Term Loan, 5.336%, maturing
October 05, 2012
 
 
   
9,406,199
   
    Education Management Corporation   B2   B+        
  8,235,191       Term Loan, 6.625%, maturing June 01, 2013         7,167,194    
    Emdeon Business Services, LLC   B1   BB-        
  2,374,094
 
  Term Loan, 7.107%, maturing
November 16, 2013
 
 
   
2,190,101
   
    EMSC, L.P.   Ba1   BB        
  3,202,387
 
  Term Loan, 7.117%, maturing
February 10, 2012
 
 
   
2,978,220
   
    Gambro   NR   NR        
  646,459       Term Loan, 5.565%, maturing June 05, 2014         592,049    
SEK 2,111,070       Term Loan, 7.196%, maturing June 05, 2014         313,964    
SEK 2,146,343       Term Loan, 7.196%, maturing June 05, 2014         319,209    
$ 646,459       Term Loan, 6.065%, maturing June 05, 2015         595,281    
SEK 2,111,070       Term Loan, 7.696%, maturing June 05, 2015         315,678    
SEK 2,146,343       Term Loan, 7.696%, maturing June 05, 2015         320,952    
    Gentiva Health Services, Inc.   Ba3   BB-        
$ 2,513,513       Term Loan, 6.207%, maturing        
   
    March 31, 2013         2,306,149    
  Golden Gate National Senior Care     
    Holdings, LLC   Ba3   BB-        
  1,089,857
 
  Term Loan, 5.872%, maturing
March 14, 2011
 
 
   
1,002,669
   

 

See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
38



ING Prime Rate Trust

PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS as of February 29, 2008 (continued)

            Bank Loan
Ratings†
(Unaudited)
  Market  
Principal Amount       Borrower/Tranche Description   Moody's   S&P   Value  
Healthcare, Education and Childcare: (continued)  
        Harlan Sprague Dawley, Inc.   B2   BB-        
$ 2,508,750       Term Loan, 5.706%, maturing July 11, 2014       $ 2,295,506    
        Harrington Holdings, Inc.   B1   BB-        
  2,448,167
 
  Term Loan, 7.080%, maturing
January 11, 2014
 
 
   
2,191,109
   
        HCA, Inc.   Ba3   BB        
  35,237,035
 
  Term Loan, 7.080%, maturing
November 17, 2013
 
 
   
32,536,434
   
        Health Management Associates, Inc.   Ba2   BB-        
  6,692,954
 
  Term Loan, 6.580%, maturing
February 28, 2014
 
 
   
5,782,884
   
        Iasis Healthcare, LLC   Ba2   B+        
  2,978,605
 
  Term Loan, 5.248%, maturing
March 15, 2014
 
 
   
2,621,172
   
  758,824
 
  Term Loan, 5.551%, maturing
March 15, 2014
 
 
   
667,765
   
  273,450
 
  Term Loan, 6.631%, maturing
March 15, 2014
 
 
   
240,636
   
        IM US Holdings, LLC   B1   BB        
  4,975,000       Term Loan, 6.843%, maturing June 26, 2014         4,433,969    
        inVentiv Health, Inc.   Ba3   BB-        
  938,143       Term Loan, 6.580%, maturing July 06, 2014         843,156    
        Lifepoint Hospitals, Inc.   Ba2   BB        
  1,821,524       Term Loan, 4.710%, maturing April 15, 2012         1,670,272    
        Multiplan, Inc.   B1   B+        
  1,316,894       Term Loan, 5.622%, maturing April 12, 2013         1,198,786    
        Mylan Laboratories, Inc.   B1   BB        
  1,500,000
 
  Term Loan, 7.098%, maturing
October 02, 2014
 
 
   
1,454,166
   
        National Mentor, Inc.   B1   B+        
  117,736       Term Loan, 6.600%, maturing June 29, 2013         103,019    
  1,989,837       Term Loan, 6.730%, maturing June 29, 2013         1,741,108    
        Nycomed   NR   NR        
EUR 394,286       Term Loan, 7.013%, maturing
December 10, 2014
        451,745    
EUR 543,619       Term Loan, 7.013%, maturing
December 10, 2014
        622,841    
EUR 1,418,795       Term Loan, 7.013%, maturing
December 10, 2014
        1,625,557    
EUR 87,538       Term Loan, 7.013%, maturing
December 10, 2014
        100,295    
EUR 55,762       Term Loan, 7.013%, maturing
December 10, 2014
        63,889    
EUR 394,286       Term Loan, 7.763%, maturing
December 10, 2014
        451,745    
EUR 55,762       Term Loan, 7.763%, maturing
December 10, 2014
        63,889    
EUR 543,619       Term Loan, 7.763%, maturing
December 10, 2014
        622,841    

 

See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
39



ING Prime Rate Trust

PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS as of February 29, 2008 (continued)

            Bank Loan
Ratings†
(Unaudited)
  Market  
Principal Amount       Borrower/Tranche Description   Moody's   S&P   Value  
Healthcare, Education and Childcare: (continued)  
EUR 1,418,795       Term Loan, 7.763%, maturing        
   
        December 10, 2014       $ 1,625,557    
EUR 87,538       Term Loan, 7.763%, maturing
December 10, 2014
        100,295    
        Orthofix International/Colgate Medical   Ba3   BB+        
$ 1,804,242       Term Loan, 6.580%, maturing        
   
        September 22, 2013         1,632,839    
        Psychiatric Solutions, Inc.   Ba3   BB-        
  670,879       Term Loan, 6.173%, maturing July 01, 2012         618,886    
        Quintiles Transnational Corporation   B1   BB        
  4,991,473
 
  Term Loan, 6.830%, maturing
March 31, 2013
 
 
   
4,667,027
   
        Renal Advantage, Inc.   NR   B+        
  3,570,991
 
  Term Loan, 7.466%, maturing
October 06, 2012
 
 
   
3,187,109
   
        Rural/Metro Operating Company, LLC   Ba2   BB-        
  519,127
 
  Term Loan, 6.450%, maturing
March 04, 2011
 
 
   
514,585
   
  976,470
 
  Term Loan, 6.965%, maturing
March 04, 2011
 
 
   
967,925
   
        Select Medical Corporation   Ba2   BB-        
  2,431,250
 
  Term Loan, 5.149%, maturing
February 24, 2012
 
 
   
2,204,840
   
        Sterigenics International, Inc.   B3   BB-        
  1,954,310
 
  Term Loan, 7.330%, maturing
November 21, 2013
 
 
   
1,778,422
   
        Stiefel Laboratories, Inc.   B1   BB-        
  1,179,896
 
  Term Loan, 6.693%, maturing
December 28, 2013
 
 
   
1,094,353
   
  1,542,604
 
  Term Loan, 6.693%, maturing
December 28, 2013
 
 
   
1,430,766
   
        Sun Healthcare Group, Inc.   Ba2   B+        
  139,655       Term Loan, 5.901%, maturing April 12, 2014         127,086    
  847,364       Term Loan, 5.918%, maturing April 12, 2014         771,101    
  217,241       Term Loan, 6.930%, maturing April 12, 2014         197,690    
        Surgical Care Affiliates, LLC   Ba3   B        
  2,985,000
 
  Term Loan, 7.080%, maturing
December 29, 2014
 
 
   
2,492,475
   
        Team Health, Inc.   B1   BB-        
  2,042,359
 
  Term Loan, 5.089%, maturing
November 23, 2012
 
 
   
1,802,381
   
        United Surgical Partners International, Inc.   Ba3   B        
  204,839       Term Loan, 4.166%, maturing April 19, 2014         184,355    
  1,664,839       Term Loan, 5.490%, maturing April 19, 2014         1,498,355    
        Vanguard Health Holdings Company II, LLC   Ba3   B+        
  7,823,387
 
  Term Loan, 5.372%, maturing
September 23, 2011
 
 
   
7,256,192
   
        Viant Holdings, Inc.   Ba3   B+        
  746,250       Term Loan, 7.080%, maturing June 25, 2014         570,881    
        VWR International, Inc.   B1   B+        
EUR 2,500,000       Term Loan, 7.271%, maturing June 29, 2014         3,399,211    

 

See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
40



ING Prime Rate Trust

PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS as of February 29, 2008 (continued)

            Bank Loan
Ratings†
(Unaudited)
  Market  
Principal Amount       Borrower/Tranche Description   Moody's   S&P   Value  
Healthcare, Education and Childcare: (continued)  
$ 3,500,000       Term Loan, 7.330%, maturing June 29, 2014       $ 3,018,750    
      194,840,976    
Home & Office Furnishings: 1.6%      
        Global Garden Products Italy, S.P.A.   NR   NR        
EUR 1,250,000       Term Loan, 7.148%, maturing        
   
        October 19, 2014         1,666,373    
EUR 1,250,000       Term Loan, 7.648%, maturing        
   
        October 19, 2015         1,675,868    
        Hilding Anders   NR   NR        
SEK 18,071,429       Term Loan, 6.690%, maturing April 25, 2015         2,274,335    
EUR 328,571       Term Loan, 6.999%, maturing April 25, 2015         410,564    
        National Bedding Company   B1   BB        
$ 2,194,088       Term Loan, 5.969%, maturing        
   
        February 28, 2013         1,843,034    
        Simmons Company   Ba2   BB-        
  6,942,562
 
  Term Loan, 5.627%, maturing
December 19, 2011
 
 
   
6,230,950
   
      14,101,124    
Insurance: 1.8%      
        AmWINS Group, Inc.   B2   B-        
  1,990,000       Term Loan, 6.708%, maturing June 08, 2013         1,417,875    
        Applied Systems, Inc.   B1   B-        
  1,975,000
 
  Term Loan, 7.190%, maturing
September 26, 2013
 
 
   
1,797,250
   
        Conseco, Inc.   Ba3   B+        
  6,177,525
 
  Term Loan, 5.122%, maturing
October 10, 2013
 
 
   
5,106,756
   
        Crawford & Company   B1   BB-        
  2,861,161
 
  Term Loan, 7.580%, maturing
October 30, 2013
 
 
   
2,625,115
   
        Hub International, Ltd.   B2   B+        
  283,967       Term Loan, 6.069%, maturing June 13, 2014         247,051    
  1,625,817       Term Loan, 7.330%, maturing June 13, 2014         1,414,461    
        Swett & Crawford   B2   B        
  2,580,500       Term Loan, 6.248%, maturing April 03, 2014         2,038,595    
        USI Holdings Corporation   B2   B        
  1,791,000       Term Loan, 7.580%, maturing May 05, 2014         1,598,468    
      16,245,571    
Leisure, Amusement, Entertainment: 8.1%      
        24 Hour Fitness Worldwide, Inc.   Ba3   B+        
  3,193,125       Term Loan, 6.949%, maturing June 08, 2012         2,650,294    
        Alpha D2, Ltd.   NR   NR        
  1,714,286
 
  Term Loan, 7.093%, maturing
December 31, 2012
 
 
   
1,502,571
   
  1,285,714
 
  Term Loan, 7.093%, maturing
December 31, 2013
 
 
   
1,126,929
   
        AMF Bowling Worldwide, Inc.   B1   B+        
  3,109,375       Term Loan, 7.678%, maturing June 10, 2013         2,565,234    
        Cedar Fair, L.P.   Ba3   BB        
  7,877,531
 
  Term Loan, 5.122%, maturing
August 30, 2012
 
 
   
7,343,829
   

 

See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
41



ING Prime Rate Trust

PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS as of February 29, 2008 (continued)

            Bank Loan
Ratings†
(Unaudited)
  Market  
Principal Amount       Borrower/Tranche Description   Moody's   S&P   Value  
Leisure, Amusement, Entertainment: (continued)      
        Cinemark USA, Inc.   Ba3   B        
$ 3,688,682       Term Loan, 5.340%, maturing        
   
        October 05, 2013       $ 3,276,011    
        HIT Entertainment, Inc.   Ba3   B+        
  1,940,892
 
  Term Loan, 5.150%, maturing
March 20, 2012
 
 
   
1,659,463
   
        Kerasotes Showplace Theater, LLC   B1   B-        
  120,000
    Revolver, 1.098%, maturing
October 31, 2010
 
 
   
114,000
   
  302,295
 
  Term Loan, 5.438%, maturing
October 28, 2011
 
 
   
272,066
   
        Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc.   Ba3   B+        
  7,833,661       Term Loan, 8.108%, maturing April 08, 2012         6,508,464    
  33,326,493       Term Loan, 8.108%, maturing April 08, 2012         27,688,750    
        NEP II, Inc.   B1   B        
  4,463,748
 
  Term Loan, 7.108%, maturing
February 16, 2014
 
 
   
3,969,017
   
        Warner Music Group   Ba3   BB-        
  14,931,517
 
  Term Loan, 5.249%, maturing
February 28, 2011
 
 
   
13,519,249
   
      72,195,877    
Lodging: 2.0%      
        Audio Visual Services Corporation   Ba3   B+        
  997,500
 
  Term Loan, 5.520%, maturing
February 28, 2014
 
 
   
907,725
   
        Hotel Del Coronado   NR   NR        
  16,400,000
 
  Term Loan, 5.987%, maturing
January 15, 2009
 
 
   
16,400,000
   
      17,307,725    
Machinery: 1.5%      
        Enersys Capital, Inc.   Ba2   BB        
  4,128,010
 
  Term Loan, 5.242%, maturing
March 17, 2011
 
 
   
3,849,369
   
        Kion Group   NR   NR        
EUR 1,238,909       Term Loan, 6.775%, maturing
December 23, 2014
        1,610,806    
EUR 1,145,833       Term Loan, 7.275%, maturing
December 23, 2015
        1,497,529    
        LN Acquisition Corporation   B1   BB-        
$ 362,045       Term Loan, 5.751%, maturing July 11, 2014         336,702    
  135,682       Term Loan, 5.754%, maturing July 11, 2014         126,184    
        Maxim Crane Works, L.P.   B1   BB-        
  2,487,500       Term Loan, 5.145%, maturing June 29, 2014         2,189,000    
        United Rentals, Inc.   Ba1   BB+        
  3,505,377
 
  Term Loan, 5.100%, maturing
February 14, 2011
 
 
   
3,341,791
   
      12,951,381    
Mining, Steel, Iron & Nonprecious Metals: 1.0%      
        Continental Alloys & Services, Inc.   B2   B        
  497,500       Term Loan, 7.330%, maturing June 15, 2012         472,625    

 

See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
42



ING Prime Rate Trust

PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS as of February 29, 2008 (continued)

            Bank Loan
Ratings†
(Unaudited)
  Market  
Principal Amount       Borrower/Tranche Description   Moody's   S&P   Value  
Mining, Steel, Iron & Nonprecious Metals: (continued)      
        Noranda Aluminum Acquisition Corporation   Ba2   BB-        
$ 741,563       Term Loan, 5.065%, maturing May 18, 2014       $ 652,575    
        Novelis   Ba2   BB        
  1,243,750       Term Loan, 6.830%, maturing July 06, 2014         1,098,853    
  2,736,250       Term Loan, 6.830%, maturing July 06, 2014         2,417,477    
        Oxbow Carbon and Minerals Holdings, LLC   B1   BB-        
  2,909,150       Term Loan, 6.820%, maturing May 08, 2014         2,574,598    
  260,436       Term Loan, 6.830%, maturing May 08, 2014         230,486    
        Tube City IMS Corporation   Ba3   BB        
  162,162
 
  Term Loan, 7.080%, maturing
January 25, 2013
 
 
   
147,568
   
  1,327,804
 
  Term Loan, 7.080%, maturing
January 25, 2013
 
 
   
1,208,302
   
      8,802,484    
North American Cable: 17.1%      
        Atlantic Broadband   B1   B        
  1,970,116
 
  Term Loan, 7.080%, maturing
August 10, 2012
 
 
   
1,742,731
   
        Bresnan Communications, LLC   B2   BB-        
  2,750,000
 
  Term Loan, 5.576%, maturing
September 29, 2013
 
 
   
2,477,945
   
  2,246,939       Term Loan, 5.930%, maturing April 30, 2014         2,024,651    
        Cequel Communications, LLC   B1   BB-        
  38,716,957       Term Loan, 6.508%, maturing April 04, 2013         32,729,031    
        Cequel Communications, LLC   Caa1   B-        
  525,000       Term Loan, 7.739%, maturing May 05, 2014         404,250    
        Charter Communications Operating, LLC   B1   B+        
  60,364,583
 
  Term Loan, 5.260%, maturing
March 06, 2014
 
 
   
53,228,644
   
        CSC Holdings, Inc.   Ba1   BBB-        
  31,288,184
    Term Loan, 6.896%, maturing
March 29, 2013
 
     
29,010,655
   
        Insight Midwest Holdings, LLC   Ba3   BB-        
  11,002,500       Term Loan, 6.730%, maturing April 06, 2014         9,914,287    
        Knology, Inc.   B2   B        
  1,990,000       Term Loan, 6.953%, maturing June 30, 2012         1,691,500    
        Mediacom Broadband, LLC   Ba3   BB-        
  10,781,100
 
  Term Loan, 4.895%, maturing
January 31, 2015
 
 
   
9,339,128
   
        Quebecor Media, Inc.   B1   B        
  2,940,000
 
  Term Loan, 6.258%, maturing
January 17, 2013
 
 
   
2,690,100
   
        San Juan Cable, LLC   B1   BB-        
  1,716,867
 
  Term Loan, 6.978%, maturing
October 31, 2012
 
 
   
1,467,921
   
        WideOpenWest Finance, LLC   B2   B-        
  5,833,333       Term Loan, 5.831%, maturing June 28, 2014         4,943,750    
      151,664,593    

 

See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
43



ING Prime Rate Trust

PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS as of February 29, 2008 (continued)

            Bank Loan
Ratings†
(Unaudited)
  Market  
Principal Amount       Borrower/Tranche Description   Moody's   S&P   Value  
Oil & Gas: 6.8%      
        Alon USA   B1   BB        
$ 1,751,111       Term Loan, 5.372%, maturing June 22, 2013       $ 1,562,867    
  218,889       Term Loan, 5.521%, maturing June 22, 2013         195,358    
        Atlas Pipeline Partners, L.P.   Ba3   BB-        
  3,000,000       Term Loan, 5.880%, maturing July 27, 2014         2,840,001    
        Calumet Lubricants Company   B1   BB-        
  2,102,012
 
  Term Loan, 7.065%, maturing
December 15, 2014
 
 
   
1,986,401
   
  272,989
 
  Term Loan, 8.553%, maturing
December 15, 2014
 
 
   
257,974
   
        Coffeyville Resources, LLC   B2   BB-        
  1,067,105
 
  Term Loan, 7.979%, maturing
December 28, 2010
 
 
   
1,007,525
   
  1,271,707
 
  Term Loan, 7.479%, maturing
December 28, 2013
 
 
   
1,200,704
   
        CR Gas Storage   Ba3   BB-        
  461,382       Term Loan, 6.741%, maturing May 13, 2011         432,545    
  317,452       Term Loan, 6.808%, maturing May 12, 2013         297,611    
  2,851,846       Term Loan, 7.323%, maturing May 12, 2013         2,673,606    
  469,832       Term Loan, 7.323%, maturing May 12, 2013         440,468    
        Energy Transfer Company, L.P.   Ba2   NR        
  8,000,000
 
  Term Loan, 4.878%, maturing
February 08, 2012
 
 
   
7,516,664
   
        Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc.   Ba2   BB+        
  2,636,858       Term Loan, 6.536%, maturing July 01, 2013         2,461,066    
        Hercules Offshore, LLC   Ba3   BB        
  2,487,500       Term Loan, 6.580%, maturing July 11, 2013         2,310,266    
        McJunkin Corporation   B2   B+        
  2,677,613
    Term Loan, 8.080%, maturing
January 31, 2013
 
     
2,557,121
   
        MEG Energy   Ba3   BB        
  918,800       Term Loan, 3.217%, maturing April 03, 2013         833,811    
  2,751,000       Term Loan, 6.830%, maturing April 03, 2013         2,514,414    
        Pine Prairie Energy Center   B1   B+        
  496,250
 
  Term Loan, 5.670%, maturing
December 31, 2013
 
 
   
473,919
   
        Semcrude, L.P.   Ba2   NR        
  5,211,875
 
  Term Loan, 5.122%, maturing
March 01, 2011
 
 
   
5,016,430
   
        SG Resources Mississippi, LLC   B1   BB-        
  2,500,000       Term Loan, 5.019%, maturing April 02, 2014         2,350,000    
        Targa Resources, Inc.   Ba3   B+        
  4,186,452
 
  Term Loan, 6.903%, maturing
October 31, 2012
 
 
   
3,931,079
   
  1,758,674
 
  Term Loan, 6.955%, maturing
October 31, 2012
 
 
   
1,651,395
   
        Venoco, Inc.   Caa1   B        
  3,000,000
 
  Term Loan, 7.125%, maturing
September 20, 2011
 
 
   
2,640,000
   

 

See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
44



ING Prime Rate Trust

PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS as of February 29, 2008 (continued)

            Bank Loan
Ratings†
(Unaudited)
  Market  
Principal Amount       Borrower/Tranche Description   Moody's   S&P   Value  
Oil & Gas: (continued)  
        Vulcan Energy Corporation   Ba2   BB        
$ 4,340,471       Term Loan, 4.628%, maturing        
   
        August 12, 2011       $ 4,085,469    
        Western Refining, Inc.   B1   BB+        
  10,348,000       Term Loan, 4.994%, maturing May 30, 2014         9,360,625    
      60,597,319    
Other Broadcasting and Entertainment: 2.4%      
        Deluxe Entertainment Services Group, Inc.   B1   B        
  118,110       Term Loan, 7.080%, maturing May 11, 2013         101,575    
  2,465,055       Term Loan, 7.080%, maturing May 11, 2013         2,119,947    
  227,858       Term Loan, 7.080%, maturing May 11, 2013         195,958    
        VNU   Ba3   B+        
  20,834,619
 
  Term Loan, 5.346%, maturing
August 09, 2013
 
 
   
18,490,724
   
      20,908,204    
Other Telecommunications: 4.0%      
        Asurion Corporation   B2   B-        
  15,250,000       Term Loan, 6.095%, maturing July 03, 2014         13,008,250    
        BCM Ireland Holdings, Ltd.   Ba3   BB        
EUR 2,083,333       Term Loan, 6.625%, maturing        
   
        September 30, 2014         2,778,507    
EUR 2,083,333       Term Loan, 6.875%, maturing        
   
        September 30, 2015         2,782,564    
        Cavalier Telephone   B3   B-        
$ 2,475,013       Term Loan, 9.580%, maturing        
   
        December 31, 2012         1,905,760    
        Gabriel Communications   B2   CCC+        
  497,500       Term Loan, 8.241%, maturing May 31, 2014         449,616    
        Hargray Communications Group, Inc.   B1   B        
  480,692       Term Loan, 7.080%, maturing June 29, 2014         441,035    
        Hawaiian Telcom Communications, Inc.   Ba3   B-        
  2,818,023       Term Loan, 7.080%, maturing June 01, 2014         2,299,036    
        Iowa Telecommunications Services, Inc.   Ba3   BB-        
  1,500,000
 
  Term Loan, 6.679%, maturing
November 23, 2011
 
 
   
1,397,813
   
        Kentucky Data Link, Inc.   B1   B        
  3,966,284
 
  Term Loan, 5.372%, maturing
February 26, 2014
 
 
   
3,569,656
   
        One Communications   B2   B-        
  2,851,071       Term Loan, 9.000%, maturing June 30, 2012         2,551,709    
        PAETEC Holding Corporation   B1   B-        
  642,672
 
  Term Loan, 5.622%, maturing
February 28, 2013
 
 
   
582,153
   
        Time Warner Telecom Holdings, Inc.   Ba2   B        
  3,187,800
 
  Term Loan, 5.130%, maturing
January 07, 2013
 
 
   
2,974,217
   
        U.S. Telepacific Corporation   B1   CCC+        
  987,503
 
  Term Loan, 8.965%, maturing
August 04, 2011
 
 
   
957,878
   
      35,698,194    

 

See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
45



ING Prime Rate Trust

PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS as of February 29, 2008 (continued)

            Bank Loan
Ratings†
(Unaudited)
  Market  
Principal Amount       Borrower/Tranche Description   Moody's   S&P   Value  
Personal & Nondurable Consumer Products: 4.7%      
        Advantage Sales And Marketing   B2   B-        
$ 3,041,360       Term Loan, 5.563%, maturing        
   
        March 29, 2013       $ 2,645,984    
        Bushnell Performance Optics   Ba3   BB-        
  1,745,625
 
  Term Loan, 8.580%, maturing
August 24, 2013
 
 
   
1,640,888
   
        Fender Musical Instruments Corporation   B2   B+        
  1,166,667       Term Loan, 6.970%, maturing June 09, 2014         991,667    
  2,321,667       Term Loan, 7.160%, maturing June 09, 2014         1,973,417    
        Gibson Guitar Corporation   B2   B        
  495,000
 
  Term Loan, 7.330%, maturing
December 29, 2013
 
 
   
475,200
   
        Huish Detergents, Inc.   B1   B+        
  2,686,500       Term Loan, 6.830%, maturing April 26, 2014         2,196,214    
        Information Resources, Inc.   Ba2   B+        
  463,080       Term Loan, 4.845%, maturing May 16, 2014         400,565    
        Jarden Corporation   Ba3   BB-        
  1,184,282
    Term Loan, 6.580%, maturing
January 24, 2012
 
     
1,090,198
   
  9,193,720
 
  Term Loan, 6.580%, maturing
January 24, 2012
 
 
   
8,463,335
   
        KIK Custom Products, Inc.   B1   B        
  72,988       Term Loan, 7.110%, maturing May 31, 2014         53,038    
  425,762       Term Loan, 7.110%, maturing May 31, 2014         309,387    
        Mega Bloks, Inc.   Ba3   B        
  975,000       Term Loan, 5.500%, maturing July 26, 2012         770,250    
        Natural Products Group, LLC   B1   B+        
  1,588,141
 
  Term Loan, 6.182%, maturing
March 08, 2014
 
 
   
1,052,143
   
        Norwood Promotional Products   NR   NR        
  16,875,587
 
  Term Loan, 6.000%, maturing
August 17, 2011
 
 
   
15,525,540
   
        Spectrum Brands, Inc.   B2   B-        
  44,301
 
  Term Loan, 7.144%, maturing
March 30, 2013
 
 
   
39,882
   
  881,824
 
  Term Loan, 7.815%, maturing
March 30, 2013
 
 
   
793,862
   
        Totes Isotoner Corporation   B2   B        
  412,500
 
  Term Loan, 7.331%, maturing
January 31, 2013
 
 
   
367,125
   
        Yankee Candle Company, Inc.   Ba3   BB-        
  3,693,077
 
  Term Loan, 6.831%, maturing
February 06, 2014
 
 
   
3,277,606
   
      42,066,301    
Personal, Food & Miscellaneous: 2.5%      
        Acosta, Inc.   B1   B        
  2,955,000       Term Loan, 5.370%, maturing July 28, 2013         2,580,699    
        Arbys Restaurant Group, Inc.   Ba3   BB        
  5,355,078       Term Loan, 5.715%, maturing July 25, 2012         4,946,754    

 

See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
46



ING Prime Rate Trust

PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS as of February 29, 2008 (continued)

            Bank Loan
Ratings†
(Unaudited)
  Market  
Principal Amount       Borrower/Tranche Description   Moody's   S&P   Value  
Personal, Food & Miscellaneous: (continued)      
        Culligan International Company   B2   B+        
$ 992,500       Term Loan, 6.345%, maturing        
   
        November 24, 2012       $ 755,955    
        Dennys, Inc.   Ba2   BB        
  762,613
    Term Loan, 6.855%, maturing
March 31, 2012
 
     
718,763
   
  555,000
 
  Term Loan, 6.950%, maturing
March 31, 2012
 
 
   
523,088
   
        MD Beauty, Inc.   B1   BB-        
  2,406,749
 
  Term Loan, 5.380%, maturing
February 18, 2012
 
 
   
2,310,479
   
        N.E.W. Customer Services Companies, Inc.   B1   B        
  3,191,953       Term Loan, 6.416%, maturing May 22, 2014         2,601,442    
        OSI Restaurant Partners, Inc.   B1   BB-        
  372,420       Term Loan, 7.488%, maturing June 14, 2013         304,853    
  4,402,983       Term Loan, 5.438%, maturing June 14, 2014         3,604,154    
        QCE, LLC   B2   B+        
  2,035,667       Term Loan, 7.030%, maturing May 05, 2013         1,739,042    
        Reddy Ice Group, Inc.   Ba3   BB-        
  1,000,000
 
  Term Loan, 6.127%, maturing
August 09, 2012
 
 
   
900,000
   
        Sbarro, Inc.   Ba3   B+        
  496,250
 
  Term Loan, 7.407%, maturing
January 31, 2014
 
 
   
443,523
   
        Seminole Hard Rock Entertainment   B1   BB        
  750,000
 
  Floating Rate Note, 7.491%, maturing
March 15, 2014
 
 
   
585,000
   
        U.S. Security Holdings, Inc.   B1   B+        
  614,063       Term Loan, 7.350%, maturing May 08, 2013         610,992    
      22,624,744    
Printing & Publishing: 11.8%      
        American Achievement Corporation   Ba3   BB-        
  520,531
 
  Term Loan, 5.424%, maturing
March 25, 2011
 
 
   
481,491
   
        Ascend Media Holdings, LLC   B3   B        
  853,249
 
  Term Loan, 8.964%, maturing
January 31, 2012
 
 
   
733,794
   
        Black Press, Ltd.   Ba3   BB-        
  728,621
 
  Term Loan, 5.085%, maturing
August 02, 2013
 
 
   
658,313
   
  1,203,136
 
  Term Loan, 5.085%, maturing
August 02, 2013
 
 
   
1,087,334
   
        Canwest Media, Inc.   Ba1   BB-        
  1,985,000       Term Loan, 5.085%, maturing July 10, 2014         1,808,831    
        Caribe Information Investments, Inc.   B1   B+        
  1,742,742
 
  Term Loan, 6.013%, maturing
March 31, 2013
 
 
   
1,581,538
   
        Cengage Learning, Inc.   B1   B+        
  17,206,875       Term Loan, 5.813%, maturing July 05, 2014         15,102,939    

 

See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
47



ING Prime Rate Trust

PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS as of February 29, 2008 (continued)

            Bank Loan
Ratings†
(Unaudited)
  Market  
Principal Amount       Borrower/Tranche Description   Moody's   S&P   Value  
Printing & Publishing: (continued)  
    Cenveo Corporation   Ba2   BB+        
$ 2,844,119       Term Loan, 6.660%, maturing June 21, 2013       $ 2,517,045    
  61,603       Term Loan, 6.660%, maturing June 21, 2013         54,519    
    Dex Media West, LLC   Ba1   BB+        
  2,777,837
    Term Loan, 5.607%, maturing
March 09, 2010
 
 
   
2,650,520
   
    Hanley Wood, LLC   B2   B        
  2,715,688       Term Loan, 6.745%, maturing
March 08, 2014
 
 
   
2,063,923
   
    Idearc, Inc.   Ba2   BBB-        
  25,170,874
 
  Term Loan, 6.830%, maturing
November 17, 2014
 
 
   
20,860,375
   
    Intermedia Outdoor, Inc.   NR   NR        
  1,633,500       Term Loan, 7.830%, maturing
January 31, 2013
 
 
   
1,429,313
   
    Mediannuaire Holding   NR   NR        
EUR 600,000       Term Loan, 7.177%, maturing April 10, 2016         760,739    
EUR 600,000       Term Loan, 7.677%, maturing April 10, 2016         764,538    
    Medimedia USA, Inc.   Ba3   BB-        
$ 1,234,375       Term Loan, 7.171%, maturing        
   
    October 05, 2013         1,129,453    
    Merrill Communications, LLC   Ba3   BB-        
  2,901,564       Term Loan, 6.399%, maturing May 15, 2011         2,596,900    
    Nelson Canada   Ba3   BB-        
  3,990,000       Term Loan, 7.330%, maturing July 05, 2014         3,670,800    
    PagesJaunes Groupe, S.A.   NR   NR        
EUR 800,000       Term Loan, 6.677%, maturing        
   
    October 24, 2013         1,052,588    
    PBL Media   B1   NR        
AUD 24,331,191       Term Loan, 9.865%, maturing        
   
    February 05, 2013         20,243,274    
  Prism Business Media Holdings/Penton     
    Media, Inc.   B1   BB-        
$ 1,687,250       Term Loan, 5.372%, maturing        
   
    February 01, 2013         1,356,127    
    R.H. Donnelley Corporation   Ba1   BB+        
  7,842,877       Term Loan, 5.866%, maturing June 30, 2011         7,260,104    
    Readers Digest   B1   B+        
EUR 751,552       Term Loan, 6.791%, maturing        
   
    March 02, 2014         936,242    
  4,342,188
 
  Term Loan, 7.131%, maturing
March 02, 2014
 
 
   
3,573,620
   
    Source Media, Inc.   B1   B        
  2,786,119
 
  Term Loan, 7.080%, maturing
November 08, 2011
 
 
   
2,451,785
   
    Thomas Nelson Publishers   B1   B        
  2,298,333       Term Loan, 6.380%, maturing June 12, 2012         1,896,125    
    Tribune Company   B2   BB-        
  497,500       Term Loan, 7.910%, maturing May 19, 2014         365,787    
    Valassis Communications, Inc.   Ba2   BB        
  971,150
 
  Term Loan, 6.580%, maturing
March 02, 2014
 
 
   
892,851
   

 

See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
48



ING Prime Rate Trust

PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS as of February 29, 2008 (continued)

            Bank Loan
Ratings†
(Unaudited)
  Market  
Principal Amount       Borrower/Tranche Description   Moody's   S&P   Value  
Printing & Publishing: (continued)  
        Yell Group, PLC   Ba3   BB-        
$ 2,000,000       Term Loan, 5.122%, maturing        
   
        February 10, 2013       $ 1,738,750    
EUR 2,000,000       Term Loan, 6.185%, maturing
February 27, 2013
        2,676,746    
      104,396,364    
Radio and TV Broadcasting: 6.7%      
        Block Communications, Inc.   Ba1   BB        
$ 980,000       Term Loan, 6.830%, maturing        
   
        December 22, 2012         901,600    
        Citadel Broadcasting Corporation   Ba3   BB-        
  9,600,000       Term Loan, 5.625%, maturing June 12, 2014         7,308,000    
        CMP KC, LLC   NR   NR        
  1,363,163       Term Loan, 7.220%, maturing May 03, 2011         1,226,847    
        CMP Susquehanna Corporation   B1   B-        
  4,936,286       Term Loan, 5.166%, maturing May 05, 2013         4,035,414    
        Cumulus Media, Inc.   Ba3   B        
  2,847,027       Term Loan, 4.885%, maturing June 11, 2014         2,363,032    
        CW Media Holdings, Inc.   Ba1   B+        
  2,743,125
 
  Term Loan, 8.080%, maturing
February 15, 2015
 
 
   
2,564,822
   
        Emmis Communication   B2   B+        
  1,205,201
 
  Term Loan, 6.843%, maturing
November 01, 2013
 
 
   
1,014,378
   
        Local TV Finance, LLC   Ba3   B+        
  2,885,500       Term Loan, 5.161%, maturing May 07, 2013         2,495,958    
        Nexstar Broadcasting Group   Ba3   BB-        
  2,251,331
 
  Term Loan, 6.580%, maturing
October 01, 2012
 
 
   
2,054,340
   
  2,377,665
 
  Term Loan, 6.580%, maturing
October 01, 2012
 
 
   
2,169,620
   
        Nextmedia Operating, Inc.   B1   B+        
  1,484,554
 
  Term Loan, 5.086%, maturing
November 15, 2012
 
 
   
1,298,985
   
  659,802
 
  Term Loan, 5.098%, maturing
November 15, 2012
 
 
   
577,327
   
        Paxson Communications   B1   CCC+        
  4,500,000
 
  Term Loan, 7.508%, maturing
January 15, 2012
 
 
   
3,825,000
   
        Regent Communications   B2   B+        
  1,485,000
 
  Term Loan, 7.093%, maturing
November 21, 2013
 
 
   
1,213,988
   
        Spanish Broadcasting Systems   B2   B-        
  3,890,000       Term Loan, 6.580%, maturing June 11, 2012         3,267,600    
        Univision Communications, Inc.   Ba3   B+        
  24,526,462
 
  Term Loan, 5.490%, maturing
September 29, 2014
 
 
   
20,661,190
   
        Univision Communications, Inc.   B3   CCC+        
  2,250,000
 
  Term Loan, 5.625%, maturing
March 29, 2009
 
 
   
2,176,875
   
      59,154,976    

 

See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
49



ING Prime Rate Trust

PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS as of February 29, 2008 (continued)

            Bank Loan
Ratings†
(Unaudited)
  Market  
Principal Amount       Borrower/Tranche Description   Moody's   S&P   Value  
Retail Stores: 10.2%      
        Amscan Holdings, Inc.   B1   B        
$ 1,488,750       Term Loan, 5.901%, maturing May 25, 2013       $ 1,339,875    
        Burlington Coat Factory   B2   B-        
  5,787,868       Term Loan, 5.340%, maturing May 28, 2013         4,889,544    
        CBR Fashion Holding   NR   NR        
EUR 500,000       Term Loan, 6.310%, maturing July 20, 2015         624,771    
EUR 460,000       Term Loan, 6.560%, maturing July 20, 2016         578,284    
        Claires Stores, Inc.   B1   B+        
$ 4,975,000       Term Loan, 6.472%, maturing May 29, 2014         3,930,250    
        Dollar General Corporation   B2   B+        
  12,500,000       Term Loan, 5.994%, maturing July 06, 2014         11,171,875    
        Dollarama Group, L.P.   Ba1   BB-        
  3,395,766
 
  Term Loan, 4.994%, maturing
November 18, 2011
 
 
   
2,988,274
   
        General Nutrition Centers, Inc.   B1   B-        
  3,573,000
 
  Term Loan, 7.035%, maturing
September 16, 2013
 
 
   
2,928,074
   
        Guitar Center, Inc.   B2   B-        
  5,000,000
 
  Term Loan, 6.640%, maturing
October 09, 2014
 
 
   
4,200,000
   
        Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc.   B1   B+        
  6,832,211       Term Loan, 5.368%, maturing July 15, 2010         6,080,667    
        Mapco Express, Inc.   B2   B+        
  2,205,959       Term Loan, 6.010%, maturing April 28, 2011         2,051,542    
        Mattress Firm   B1   B+        
  496,256
 
  Term Loan, 5.500%, maturing
January 18, 2014
 
 
   
359,786
   
        Michaels Stores, Inc.   B2   B        
  8,669,033
 
  Term Loan, 5.432%, maturing
October 31, 2013
 
 
   
7,499,702
   
        Nebraska Book Company, Inc.   Ba2   B        
  2,388,470
 
  Term Loan, 7.650%, maturing
March 04, 2011
 
 
   
2,236,205
   
        Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.   Ba3   BB+        
  14,299,578       Term Loan, 6.602%, maturing April 06, 2013         13,266,047    
        Oriental Trading Company, Inc.   B1   B+        
  2,401,524       Term Loan, 5.360%, maturing July 31, 2013         1,999,269    
        Petco Animal Supplies, Inc.   Ba3   BB-        
  5,073,750
 
  Term Loan, 6.261%, maturing
October 26, 2013
 
 
   
4,610,770
   
        Phones 4U Group, Ltd.   NR   NR        
GBP 1,615,726       Term Loan, 7.849%, maturing        
   
        September 22, 2014         2,449,442    
GBP 1,545,301       Term Loan, 8.599%, maturing        
   
        September 22, 2015         2,351,321    
        Rite Aid   Ba3   BB-        
$ 5,000,000       Term Loan, 4.907%, maturing June 04, 2014         4,454,690    
        Sally Holding, LLC   B2   BB-        
  3,458,725
 
  Term Loan, 5.700%, maturing
November 16, 2013
 
 
   
3,211,672
   

 

See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
50



ING Prime Rate Trust

PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS as of February 29, 2008 (continued)

            Bank Loan
Ratings†
(Unaudited)
  Market  
Principal Amount       Borrower/Tranche Description   Moody's   S&P   Value  
Retail Stores: (continued)      
        Sports Authority   B2   B        
$ 985,000       Term Loan, 7.080%, maturing May 03, 2013       $ 817,550    
        Toys "R" Us, Inc.   B2   BB-        
  1,368,159       Term Loan, 7.315%, maturing July 19, 2012         1,267,542    
        Vivarte   NR   NR        
EUR 2,500,000       Term Loan, 6.175%, maturing June 28, 2015         2,729,133    
EUR 2,500,000       Term Loan, 6.675%, maturing June 28, 2016         2,746,768    
      90,783,053    
Satellite: 0.4%      
        Intelsat Corporation   B1   BB-        
$ 1,398,619       Term Loan, 5.144%, maturing        
   
        January 03, 2012         1,277,405    
  1,398,200
 
  Term Loan, 5.144%, maturing
January 03, 2012
 
 
   
1,277,022
   
  1,398,200
 
  Term Loan, 5.144%, maturing
January 03, 2012
 
 
   
1,277,022
   
      3,831,449    
Telecommunications Equipment: 1.4%      
        Macquarie UK Broadcast Ventures, Ltd.   NR   NR        
GBP 4,500,000       Term Loan, 7.951%, maturing        
   
        December 01, 2014         7,448,287    
        Sorenson Communications, Inc.   B1   B        
$ 4,885,214       Term Loan, 7.375%, maturing        
   
        August 16, 2014         4,598,207    
      12,046,494    
Textiles & Leather: 1.1%      
        Hanesbrands, Inc.   Ba2   BB        
  937,041
 
  Term Loan, 4.998%, maturing
September 05, 2013
 
 
   
896,631
   
        Iconix Brand Group, Inc.   Ba2   BB        
  1,687,271       Term Loan, 7.080%, maturing April 30, 2013         1,573,380    
        Polymer Group, Inc.   B1   BB        
  6,737,196
 
  Term Loan, 7.093%, maturing
November 22, 2012
 
 
   
5,731,126
   
        St. John Knits International, Inc.   B1   BB        
  698,281
 
  Term Loan, 7.843%, maturing
March 21, 2012
 
 
   
607,505
   
        Targus Group, Inc.   B2   B        
  1,457,221
 
  Term Loan, 7.608%, maturing
November 22, 2012
 
 
   
1,258,066
   
      10,066,708    
Utilities: 9.4%      
        Boston Generating, LLC   B1   B+        
  256,593
    Term Loan, 7.080%, maturing
December 20, 2013
 
 
    225,664    
  1,916,404
 
  Term Loan, 7.080%, maturing
December 20, 2013
 
 
   
1,685,408
   
  7,070,723
 
  Term Loan, 7.080%, maturing
December 20, 2013
 
 
   
6,218,446
   

 

See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
51



ING Prime Rate Trust

PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS as of February 29, 2008 (continued)

            Bank Loan
Ratings†
(Unaudited)
  Market  
Principal Amount       Borrower/Tranche Description   Moody's   S&P   Value  
Utilities: (continued)      
        Calpine Corporation   B2   B+        
$ 315,000         Revolver, 1.337%, maturing        
   
        March 29, 2009       $ 281,925    
  8,534,079
 
  Term Loan, 7.080%, maturing
March 29, 2009
 
 
   
7,622,000
   
        Cellnet Technology, Inc.   Ba2   NR        
  1,299,620       Term Loan, 6.860%, maturing July 22, 2011         1,202,148    
        Cellnet Technology, Inc.   B2   NR        
  333,333
    Term Loan, 9.110%, maturing
October 22, 2011
 
 
    303,333    
        Coleto Creek WLE, L.P.   B1   BB-        
  375,000       Revolver, 1.709%, maturing June 30, 2011         273,750    
  5,215,703       Term Loan, 7.580%, maturing June 28, 2013         4,635,456    
  764,331       Term Loan, 7.948%, maturing June 28, 2013         679,299    
        FirstLight Power Resources, Inc.   B1   BB-        
  792,683
 
  Term Loan, 7.375%, maturing
November 01, 2013
 
 
   
679,726
   
  1,834,852
 
  Term Loan, 7.430%, maturing
November 01, 2013
 
 
   
1,573,386
   
        FirstLight Power Resources, Inc.   B3   B-        
  1,675,000       Term Loan, 9.438%, maturing May 01, 2014         1,384,667    
        Infrastrux Group, Inc.   B2   B        
  4,279,474
 
  Term Loan, 7.771%, maturing
November 03, 2012
 
 
   
3,851,526
   
        KGEN, LLC   Ba3   BB        
  937,500
 
  Term Loan, 6.625%, maturing
February 05, 2014
 
 
   
820,313
   
  1,546,875
 
  Term Loan, 6.625%, maturing
February 05, 2014
 
 
   
1,353,516
   
        Longview Power, LLC   Ba3   BB        
  837,333
 
  Term Loan, 6.092%, maturing
February 28, 2014
 
 
   
761,973
   
  266,667
 
  Term Loan, 7.080%, maturing
February 28, 2014
 
 
   
242,667
   
  800,000
 
  Term Loan, 7.250%, maturing
February 28, 2014
 
 
   
728,000
   
        MACH Gen, LLC   B2   B+        
  453,125
 
  Term Loan, 6.830%, maturing
February 22, 2013
 
 
   
423,219
   
  4,336,406
 
  Term Loan, 5.100%, maturing
February 22, 2014
 
 
   
4,050,203
   
        NRG Energy, Inc.   Ba1   BB        
  13,223,556
    Term Loan, 6.480%, maturing
February 01, 2013
 
 
    12,215,260    
  7,904,268
 
  Term Loan, 6.580%, maturing
February 01, 2013
 
 
   
7,301,567
   
        NSG Holdings, LLC   Ba2   BB        
  183,673       Term Loan, 6.560%, maturing June 15, 2014         163,469    
  1,390,112       Term Loan, 6.560%, maturing June 15, 2014         1,237,199    

 

See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
52



ING Prime Rate Trust

PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS as of February 29, 2008 (continued)

            Bank Loan
Ratings†
(Unaudited)
  Market  
Principal Amount       Borrower/Tranche Description   Moody's   S&P   Value  
Utilities: (continued)  
    Riverside Energy Center, LLC   Ba3   B        
$ 57,431       Term Loan, 9.210%, maturing June 24, 2010       $ 56,498    
  367,065       Term Loan, 7.494%, maturing June 24, 2011         361,101    
  677,766       Term Loan, 7.494%, maturing June 24, 2011         666,752    
  Texas Competitive Electric Holdings     
    Company, LLC   Ba3   B+        
  5,985,000
 
  Term Loan, 6.579%, maturing
October 10, 2014
 
 
    5,478,450    
  2,997,500
 
  Term Loan, 6.583%, maturing
October 10, 2014
 
 
    2,742,713    
    TPF Generation Holdings, LLC   Ba3   BB-        
  4,755,118
 
  Term Loan, 6.830%, maturing
December 15, 2013
 
 
   
4,163,700
   
  1,600,000
 
  Term Loan, 6.930%, maturing
December 15, 2013
 
 
   
1,401,000
   
    TPF Generation Holdings, LLC   B3   B-        
  1,500,000
 
  Term Loan, 9.080%, maturing
December 15, 2014
 
 
   
1,300,001
   
    Viridian Group PLC   NR   NR        
EUR 1,072,386       Term Loan, 8.304%, maturing
December 19, 2012
        1,354,926    
GBP 1,080,000       Term Loan, 9.726%, maturing
December 19, 2012
        1,818,009    
    Wolf Hollow I, L.P.   B1   B+        
$ 450,000       Term Loan, 5.372%, maturing June 22, 2012         371,251    
  1,800,000       Term Loan, 5.372%, maturing June 22, 2012         1,530,000    
  2,111,218       Term Loan, 7.080%, maturing June 22, 2012         1,794,536    
      82,953,057    
    Total Senior Loans
(Cost $1,830,868,483)
            1,643,761,920    
Other Corporate Debt: 0.6%  
Automobile: 0.6%  
    Avis Budget Car Rental   Ba1   BB-        
  750,000
    Floating Rate Note, 7.369%,
maturing May 15, 2014
 
 
    603,750    
    Navistar International Corporation   NR   NR        
  4,950,000
    Unsecured Term Loan, 6.501%,
maturing January 19, 2012
 
 
   
4,455,000
   
    Total Other Corporate Debt
(Cost $5,700,000)
        5,058,750    

 

See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
53



ING Prime Rate Trust

PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS as of February 29, 2008 (continued)

Equities and Other Assets: 0.1%      
 
Description
    Market
Value
 
(1), (@), (R)   Allied Digital Technologies Corporation (Residual Interest
in Bankruptcy Estate)
        $    
(@), (R)   Block Vision Holdings Corporation (571 Common Shares)              
(2), (@), (R)   Boston Chicken, Inc. (Residual Interest in Boston
Chicken Plan Trust)
             
(2), (@), (R)   Cedar Chemical (Liquidation Interest)              
(@), (R)   Covenant Care, Inc. (Warrants for 19,000 Common Shares,
Expires January 13, 2005)
             
(@), (R)   Covenant Care, Inc. (Warrants for 26,901 Common Shares,
Expires March 31, 2013)
             
(@), (R)   Decision One Corporation (1,752,103 Common Shares)              
(2), (@), (R)   Enterprise Profit Solutions (Liquidation Interest)              
(@), (R)   EquityCo, LLC (Warrants for 28,752 Common Shares)              
(4), (@), (R)   Euro United Corporation (Residual Interest
in Bankruptcy Estate)
             
(2), (@), (R)   Grand Union Company (Residual Interest
in Bankruptcy Estate)
             
(@), (R)   Humphrey's, Inc. (Residual Interest in Bankruptcy Estate)              
(@), (R)   IAP Acquisition Corporation (3,524 Common Shares)              
(@), (R)   IAP Acquisition Corporation (1,084 Common Shares)              
(@), (R)   IAP Acquisition Corporation (1,814 Common Shares)              
(@), (R)   IAP Acquisition Corporation (17,348 Common Shares)              
(2), (@), (R)   Imperial Home Décor Group, Inc. (Liquidation Interest)              
(2), (@), (R)   IT Group, Inc. (Residual Interest in Bankruptcy Estate)           25    
(2), (@), (R)   Kevco Inc. (Residual Interest in Bankruptcy Estate)           25    
(2), (@), (R)   Lincoln Paper & Tissue (Warrants for 291 Common Shares,
Expires August 14, 2015)
             
(@), (R)   Lincoln Pulp and Eastern Fine (Residual Interest
in Bankruptcy Estate)
             
(@), (R)
  Norwood Promotional Products, Inc.
(104,148 Common Shares)
             
(@), (R)   Norwood Promotional Products, Inc.
(Contingent Value Rights)
          377,999    
(@), (R)   Safelite Realty Corporation (57,804 Common Shares)           462,432    
(1), (@), (R)   Transtar Metals (Residual Interest in Bankruptcy Estate)              
(1), (@), (R)   TSR Wireless, LLC (Residual Interest in Bankruptcy Estate)              
(2), (@), (R)   US Office Products Company (Residual Interest
in Bankruptcy Estate)
             
    Total for Equities and Other Assets
(Cost $5,533,613)
          840,481    
  Total Investments
(Cost $1,842,102,096)**
    186.0 %   $ 1,649,661,151    
    Other Assets and Liabilities — Net     (86.0 )     (762,685,247 )  
    Net Assets     100.0 %   $ 886,975,904    

 

  *  Senior loans, while exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, contain certain restrictions on resale and cannot be sold publicly. These senior loans bear interest (unless otherwise noted) at rates that float periodically at a margin above the London Inter-Bank Offered Rate ("LIBOR") and other short-term rates.

See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
54



ING Prime Rate Trust

PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS as of February 29, 2008 (continued)

  †  Bank Loans rated below Baa are considered to be below investment grade.

  NR  Not Rated

  (1)  The borrower filed for protection under Chapter 7 of the U.S. Federal Bankruptcy code.

  (2)  The borrower filed for protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Federal Bankruptcy code.

  (3)  Loan is on non-accrual basis.

  (4)  The borrower filed for protection under the Canadian Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act.

  (@)  Non-income producing security.

  (R)  Restricted security.

  AUD  Australian Dollar

  GBP  British Pound Stirling

  EUR  Euro

  SEK  Swedish Kronor

  **  For Federal Income Tax purposes cost of investments is $1,842,156,295.

    Net unrealized depreciation consists of the following:

Gross Unrealized Appreciation   $ 3,882,962    
Gross Unrealized Depreciation     (196,378,106 )  
Net Unrealized Depreciation   $ (192,495,144 )  

 

See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
55



ING Prime Rate Trust

PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS as of February 29, 2008 (continued)

At February 29, 2008 the following forward foreign currency contracts were outstanding for ING Prime Rate Trust :


 

Currency
 

Buy/Sell
 
Settlement
Date
  In
Exchange
For
 

Value
  Unrealized
Appreciation/
(Depreciation)
 
Australian Dollar
AUD 632,000
  Buy   04/15/08     USD
$567,555
    $ 585,729     $ 18,174    
Australian Dollar
AUD 474,000
  Buy   05/15/08     423,993       437,476       13,483    
Euro
EUR 400,000
  Buy   04/15/08     588,240       606,782       18,542    
Euro
EUR 2,140,000
  Buy   04/15/08     3,127,567       3,246,283       118,716    
Euro
EUR 1,200,000
  Buy   04/15/08     1,759,500       1,820,346       60,846    
Euro
EUR 1,605,000
  Buy   05/15/08     2,343,091       2,431,802       88,711    
Euro
EUR 900,000
  Buy   05/15/08     1,318,185       1,363,627       45,442    
British Pound Sterling
GBP 480,000
  Buy   04/15/08     943,872       951,267       7,395    
British Pound Sterling
GBP 600,000
  Buy   04/15/08     1,173,096       1,189,083       15,987    
British Pound Sterling
GBP 450,000
  Buy   05/15/08     878,094       889,810       11,716    
Sweden Kronor
SEK 1,160,000
  Buy   04/15/08     179,789       187,998       8,209    
Sweden Kronor
SEK 800,000
  Buy   04/15/08     129,329       129,654       325    
Sweden Kronor
SEK 870,000
  Buy   05/15/08     134,675       140,791       6,116    
Sweden Kronor
SEK 600,000
  Buy   05/15/08     96,864       97,097       233    
Australian Dollar
AUD 9,360,000
  Sell   04/15/08     8,160,142       8,674,719       (514,577 )  
Australian Dollar
AUD 2,182,000
  Sell   04/15/08     2,049,116       2,022,247       26,869    
Australian Dollar
AUD 7,020,000
  Sell   05/15/08     6,165,947       6,479,071       (313,124 )  
Australian Dollar
AUD 4,364,000
  Sell   06/13/08     4,064,542       4,011,008       53,534    
Euro
EUR 31,280,000
  Sell   04/15/08     46,013,818       47,450,349       (1,436,531 )  
Euro
EUR 6,885,000
  Sell   04/15/08     10,410,774       10,444,235       (33,461 )  
Euro
EUR 23,160,000
  Sell   05/15/08     34,142,472       35,090,675       (948,203 )  
Euro
EUR 13,770,000
  Sell   06/13/08     20,772,527       20,837,705       (65,178 )  
British Pound Sterling
GBP 8,200,000
  Sell   04/15/08     16,297,828       16,250,803       47,025    
British Pound Sterling
GBP 40,000
  Sell   04/15/08     77,313       79,272       (1,959 )  
British Pound Sterling
GBP 1,790,000
  Sell   04/15/08     3,545,399       3,547,431       (2,032 )  
British Pound Sterling
GBP 5,790,000
  Sell   05/15/08     11,430,618       11,448,888       (18,270 )  

 

See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
56



ING Prime Rate Trust

PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS as of February 29, 2008 (continued)


 Currency
 

Buy/Sell
  Settlement
Date
  In
Exchange
For
 

Value
  Unrealized
Appreciation/
(Depreciation)
 
British Pound Sterling
GBP 30,000
  Sell   05/15/08     USD
$57,864
    $ 59,320       $(1,456)    
British Pound Sterling
GBP 3,580,000
  Sell   06/13/08     7,060,082       7,063,612       (3,530 )  
Sweden Kronor
SEK 17,920,000
  Sell   04/15/08     2,783,477       2,904,239       (120,762 )  
Sweden Kronor
SEK 3,990,000
  Sell   04/15/08     642,576       646,647       (4,071 )  
Sweden Kronor
SEK 13,440,000
  Sell   05/15/08     2,095,482       2,174,968       (79,486 )  
Sweden Kronor
SEK 7,980,000
  Sell   06/13/08     1,281,639       1,289,375       (7,736 )  
    $ 190,715,466     $ 194,552,309     $ (3,009,053 )  

 

See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
57




ING Prime Rate Trust

JUNE 12, 2007 ANNUAL SHAREHOLDER MEETING (Unaudited)

A special meeting of shareholders of ING Prime Rate Trust was held June 12, 2007, at the offices of ING Funds, 7337 East Doubletree Ranch Road, Scottsdale, AZ 85258.

A brief description of each matter voted upon as well as the results are outlined below:

ING Prime Rate Trust, Common Shares

1  To elect eight members of the Board of Trustees to represent the interests of the holders of Common Shares of the Trust until the election and qualification of their successors.

ING Prime Rate Trust, Preferred Shares

2  To elect two members of the Board of Trustees to represent the interests of the holders of Auction Rate Cumulative Preferred Shares - Series M, T, W, Th and F of the Trust - until the election and qualification of their successors.

    Proposal*   Shares
voted for
  Shares voted
against or
withheld
  Shares
abstained
  Total
Shares Voted
 
Common   Patricia W. Chadwick     125,652,460.248       1,686,533.408             127,338,993.656    
Shares   J. Michael Earley     125,680,320.149       1,658,673.507             127,338,993.656    
Trustees   R. Barbara Gitenstein     125,554,321.201       1,784,672.455             127,338,993.656    
    Patrick W. Kenny     125,624,782.149       1,714,211.507             127,338,993.656    
    Shaun P. Mathews     125,485,141.776       1,853,851.880             127,338,993.656    
    Sheryl K. Pressler     125,507,966.487       1,831,027.169             127,338,993.656    
    David W.C. Putnam     125,647,586.379       1,691,407.277             127,338,993.656    
    John G. Turner     125,706,496.163       1,632,497.493             127,338,993.656    
Preferred                            
Shares   John V. Boyer     15,655.000       136.000             15,791.000    
Trustees   Roger B. Vincent     15,653.000       138.000             15,791.000    

 

*  All proposals were passed at this meeting.


58



ING Prime Rate Trust

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

SHAREHOLDER INVESTMENT PROGRAM

The Trust offers a Shareholder Investment Program (the "Program") which allows holders of the Trust's common shares a simple way to reinvest dividends and capital gains distributions, if any, in additional common shares of the Trust. The Program also offers holders of the Trust's common shares the ability to make optional cash investments in any amount from $100 to $100,000 on a monthly basis.

For dividend and capital gains distribution reinvestment purposes, DST will purchase shares of the Trust on the open market when the market price plus estimated fees is less than the NAV on the valuation date. The Trust will issue new shares for dividend and capital gains distribution reinvestment purchases when the market price plus estimated fees is equal to or exceeds the net asset value on the valuation date. New shares may be issued at the greater of (i) NAV or (ii) the market price of the shares during the pricing period, minus a discount of 5%.

For optional cash investments, shares will be purchased on the open market by the DST when the market price plus estimated fees is less than the NAV on the valuation date. New shares will be issued by the Trust for optional cash investments when the market price plus estimated fees is equal to or exceeds the net asset value on the valuation date. Such shares will be issued at a discount to market, determined by the Trust, between 0% and 5%.

There is no charge to participate in the Program. Participants may elect to discontinue participation in the Program at any time. Participants will share, on a pro rata basis, in the fees or expenses of any shares acquired in the open market.

Participation in the Program is not automatic. If you would like to receive more information about the Program or if you desire to participate, please contact your broker or the Trust's Shareholder Services Department at 1-(800) 992-0180.

KEY FINANCIAL DATES — CALENDAR 2008 DIVIDENDS:

DECLARATION DATE   EX-DIVIDEND DATE   PAYABLE DATE  
January 31   February 7   February 25  
February 29   March 6   March 25  
March 31   April 8   April 22  
April 30   May 8   May 22  
May 30   June 6   June 23  
June 30   July 8   July 22  
July 31   August 7   August 22  
August 29   September 8   September 22  
September 30   October 8   October 22  
October 31   November 6   November 24  
November 28   December 8   December 22  
December 19   December 29   January 13  

 

Record date will be two business days after each Ex-Dividend Date. These dates are subject to change.


59



ING Prime Rate Trust

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (continued)

STOCK DATA

The Trust's common shares are traded on the New York Stock Exchange (Symbol: PPR). Effective March 1, 2002, the Trust's name changed to ING Prime Rate Trust and its CUSIP number changed to 44977W106. The Trust's NAV and market price are published daily under the "Closed-End Funds" feature in Barron's, The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal and many other regional and national publications.

REPURCHASE OF SECURITIES BY CLOSED-END COMPANIES

In accordance with Section 23(c) of the 1940 Act, and Rule 23c-1 under the 1940 Act the Trust may from time to time purchase shares of beneficial interest of the Trust in the open market, in privately negotiated transactions and/or purchase shares to correct erroneous transactions.

NUMBER OF SHAREHOLDERS

The approximate number of record holders of Common Stock as of February 29, 2008 was 4,951 which does not include approximately 59,987 beneficial owners of shares held in the name of brokers of other nominees.

PROXY VOTING INFORMATION

A description of the policies and procedures that the Trust uses to determine how to vote proxies related to portfolio securities is available (1) without charge, upon request, by calling Shareholder Services toll-free at 1-800-992-0180; (2) on the Trust's website at www.ingfunds.com and (3) on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov. Information regarding how the Trust voted proxies related to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available without charge on the Trust's website at www.ingfunds.com and on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov.

QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS

The Trust files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The Trust's Forms N-Q are available on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov. The Trust's Forms N-Q may be reviewed and copied at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC, and information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-800-SEC-0330; and is available upon request from the Trust by calling Shareholder Services toll-free at 1-800-992-0180.

CERTIFICATIONS

In accordance with Section 303A.12 (a) of the New York Stock Exchange Listed Company Manual, the Trust submitted the Annual CEO Certification on August 2, 2007 certifying that he was not aware, as of that date, of any violation by the Trust of the NYSE's Corporate governance listing standards. In addition, as required by Section 203 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and related SEC rules, the Trust's principal executive and financial officers have made quarterly certifications, included in filings with the SEC on Forms N-CSR and N-Q, relating to, among other things, the Trust's disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial reporting.


60



ING Prime Rate Trust

TAX INFORMATION (Unaudited)

The Trust is required by Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of the 1986, as amended, to advise within 60 days of the Trust's fiscal year end (February 29, 2008) as to the federal tax status of distributions received by the Trust's shareholders. Accordingly, the Trust is hereby advising you that the following dividends were paid to Common Shareholders during the fiscal year ended February 29, 2008:

Type of Dividend   Per Share
Amount
  Ex-Dividend
Date
  Payable Date  
Ordinary Income   $ 0.0450     3/8/07   3/22/07  
  $ 0.0475     4/5/07   4/23/07  
  $ 0.0470     5/8/07   5/22/07  
  $ 0.0475     6/7/07   6/22/07  
  $ 0.0470     7/6/07   7/23/07  
  $ 0.0475     8/8/07   8/22/07  
  $ 0.0475     9/6/07   9/24/07  
  $ 0.0470     10/5/07   10/22/07  
  $ 0.0475     11/7/07   11/23/07  
  $ 0.0470     12/6/07   12/24/07  
  $ 0.0475     12/27/07   1/10/08  
  $ 0.0460     2/7/08   2/25/08  
Total   $ 0.5640            

 

The Trust is hereby advising you that the following dividends were paid to Preferred Shareholders during the fiscal year ended February 29, 2008:

Preferred Shares   Type of
Dividend
  Total Per
Share
Amount
  Auction
Dates
  Record Dates   Payable
Dates
 
Series M   Ordinary Income   $ 1,235.10     03/19/07-02/15/08   03/26/07-02/25/08   03/27/07-02/26/08  
Series T   Ordinary Income   $ 1,224.42     03/20/07-02/19/08   03/27/07-02/26/08   03/28/07-02/27/08  
Series W   Ordinary Income   $ 1,221.04     03/21/07-02/20/08   03/28/07-02/27/08   03/29/07-02/28/08  
Series Th   Ordinary Income   $ 1,223.74     03/22/07-02/21/08   03/29/07-02/28/08   03/30/07-02/29/08  
Series F   Ordinary Income   $ 1,221.11     03/23/07-02/22/08   03/30/07-02/29/08   04/02/07-03/03/08  

 

Pursuant to Internal Revenue Code Section 871(k)(1), the Trust designates 99.44% of net investment income distributions as interest-related dividends.

Above figures may differ from those cited elsewhere in this report due to differences in the calculation of income and gains under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (book) purposes and Internal Revenue Service (tax) purposes.

Shareholders are strongly advised to consult their own tax advisers with respect to the tax consequences of their investments in the Trust. In January, shareholders, excluding corporate shareholders, receive an IRS 1099-DIV regarding the federal tax status of the dividends and distributions they received in the calendar year.


61




ING Prime Rate Trust

TRUSTEE AND OFFICER INFORMATION (Unaudited)

The business and affairs of the Trust are managed under the direction of the Trust's Board. A Trustee who is not an interested person of the Trust, as defined in the 1940 Act, is an independent trustee ("Independent Trustee"). The Trustees and Officers of the Trust are listed below. The Statement of Additional Information includes additional information about trustees of the Trust and is available, without charge, upon request at (800) 992-0180.

Name, Address
and Age
  Position(s)
held with
Trust
  Term of Office
and
Length of
Time
Served(1) 
  Principal
Occupation(s)
during the
Past Five Years
  Number of
Portfolios in
Fund Complex(2)
Overseen by
Trustee
  Other
Directorships
held by
Trustee
 
Independent Trustees:  
Colleen D. Baldwin
7337 E. Doubletree Ranch Rd.
Scottsdale, Arizona 85258
Age: 47
  Trustee   October
2007 - Present
  Consultant (January 2005 - Present). Formerly, Chief Operating Officer, Ivy Asset Management Group (April 2002 - October 2004).     179     None  
John V. Boyer
7337 E. Doubletree Ranch Rd.
Scottsdale, Arizona 85258
Age: 54
  Trustee   January
2005 - Present
  President, Bechtler Arts Foundation (March 2008 - Present), and Consultant (July 2007 - Present). Formerly, President and Chief Executive Officer, Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt Institute (March 2006 - July 2007), and Executive Director, The Mark Twain House & Museum(3) (September 1989 - November 2005).     179     None  
Patricia W. Chadwick
7337 E. Doubletree Ranch Rd.
Scottsdale, Arizona 85258
Age: 59
  Trustee   January
2006 - Present
  Consultant and President of self-owned company, Ravengate Partners LLC (January 2000 - Present).     179     Wisconsin Energy
(June 2006 - Present).
 
Peter S. Drotch
7337 E. Doubletree Ranch Rd.
Scottsdale, Arizona 85258
Age: 66
  Trustee   October
2007 - Present
  Retired partner. PricewaterhouseCoopers.     179     First Marblehead Corporation,(October 2003 - Present); BlackRock Funds/State Street Research Funds, Trustee (February 2004 - January 2007); Tufts Health Plan, Director (June 2006 - Present); and University of Connecticut, Trustee (November 2004 - Present)  
J. Michael Earley
7337 E. Doubletree Ranch Rd.
Scottsdale, Arizona 85258
Age: 62
  Trustee   February
2002 - Present
  President, Chief Executive Officer and Director, Bankers Trust Company, N.A., Des Moines (June 1992 - Present).     179     Midamerica Financial Corporation (December 2002 - Present).  
Patrick W. Kenny
7337 E. Doubletree Ranch Rd.
Scottsdale, Arizona 85258
Age: 65
  Trustee   January
2005 - Present
  President and Chief Executive Officer, International Insurance Society (June 2001 - Present).     179     Assured Guaranty Ltd. (April 2004 - Present); and Odyssey Reinsurance Holdings (November 2006 - Present).  
Sheryl K. Pressler
7337 E. Doubletree Ranch Rd.
Scottsdale, Arizona 85258
Age: 57
  Trustee   January
2006 - Present
  Consultant
(May 2001 - Present).
    179     Stillwater Mining Company (May 2002 - Present); California HealthCare Foundation (June 1999 - Present); Romanian-American Enterprise Fund (February 2004 - Present) and Global Alternative Asset Management, Inc. (October 2007 - Present).  
Roger B. Vincent
7337 E. Doubletree Ranch Rd.
Scottsdale, Arizona 85258
Age: 62
  Chairman/ Trustee   February
2002 - Present
  President, Springwell Corporation (March 1989 - Present).     179     UGI Corporation (February 2006 - Present); and UGI Utilities, Inc. (February 2006 - Present).  

 


62



ING Prime Rate Trust

TRUSTEE AND OFFICER INFORMATION (Unaudited) (continued)

Name, Address
and Age
  Position(s)
held with
Trust
  Term of Office
and
Length of
Time
Served(1) 
  Principal
Occupation(s)
during the
Past Five Years
  Number of
Portfolios in
Fund Complex(2)
Overseen by
Trustee
  Other
Directorships
held by
Trustee
 
Trustees who are "Interested Persons":  
Robert W. Crispin(4)
7337 E. Doubletree Ranch Rd.
Scottsdale, Arizona 85258
Age: 61
  Trustee   October
2007 - Present
  Retired Chairman and Chief Investment Officer, ING Investment Management Co. (June 2001 - December 2007).     179     ING Life Insurance and Annuity Company (May 2006 - Present); ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company (May 2006 - Present); Midwestern United Life Insurance Company (May 2006 - Present); ReliaStar Life Insurance Company (May 2006 - Present); Security Life of Denver Insurance Company (May 2006 - Present); Belair Insurance Company Inc. (August 2005 - Present); The Nordic Insurance Company of Canada (February 2005 - Present); Trafalgar Insurance Company of Canada (February 2005 - Present); ING Novex Insurance Company of Canada (February 2005 - Present); Allianz Insurance Company of Canada (February 2005 - Present); ING Canada Inc. (December 2004 - Present); ING Bank, fsb (June 2001 - Present); ING Investment Management, Inc (June 2001 - December 2007); ING Insurance Company of Canada (June 2001 - Present); Sul America S.A. (June 2001 - Present); and ING Foundation (March 2004 - Present)  
Shaun P. Mathews(4)
7337 E. Doubletree Ranch Rd.
Scottsdale, Arizona 85258
Age: 52
  Trustee   June
2006 - Present
  President and Chief Executive Officer, ING Investments, LLC (December 2006 - Present), and Head of ING USFS Mutual Funds and Investment Products (November 2004 - November 2006). Formerly, CMO, ING USFS (April 2002 - October 2004), and Head of Rollover/Payout (October 2001 - December 2003).     179     Mark Twain House & Museum(3) (September 2002 - Present); Connecticut Forum (May 2002 - Present); Capital Community College Foundation (February 2002 - Present); ING Services Holding Company, Inc. (May 2000 - Present); Southland Life Insurance Company (June 2002 - Present); and ING Capital Corporation, LLC, ING Funds Distributor, LLC(5), ING Funds Services, LLC(6), ING Investments, LLC(7) and ING Pilgrim Funding, Inc. (March 2006 - Present).  

 

(1)  The Board is divided into three classes, with the term of one class expiring at each annual meeting of the Fund. At each annual meeting, one class of Trustees is elected to a three-year term and serves until their successors are duly elected and qualified. The tenure of each Trustee is subject to the Board's retirement policy, which states that each duly elected or appointed Trustee who is not an "interested person" of the Fund, as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended ("1940 Act") ("Independent Trustees"), shall retire from service as a Trustee at the conclusion of the first regularly scheduled meeting of the Board that is held after (a) the Trustee reaches the age of 70, if that Trustee qualifies for a retirement benefit as discussed in the board's retirement policy; or (b) the Trustee reaches the age of 72 or has served as a Trustee for 15 years, if that Trustee does not qualify for the retirement benefit. A unanimous vote of the Board may extend the retirement date of a Trustee for up to one year. An extension may be permitted if the retirement would trigger a requirement to hold a meeting of shareholders of the Fund under applicable law, whether for purposes of appointing a successor to the Trustee or if otherwise necessary under applicable law, in which case the extension would apply until such time as the shareholder meeting can be held or is no longer needed.


63



ING Prime Rate Trust

TRUSTEE AND OFFICER INFORMATION (Unaudited) (continued)

(2)  For the purposes of this table, "Fund Complex" means the following investment companies: ING Asia Pacific High Dividend Equity Income Fund, ING Equity Trust; ING Funds Trust; ING Global Equity Dividend and Premium Opportunity Fund; ING Global Advantage and Premium Opportunity Fund; ING International High Dividend Equity Income Fund; ING Investors Trust; ING Mayflower Trust; ING Mutual Funds; ING Prime Rate Trust; ING Risk Managed Natural Resources Fund; ING Senior Income Fund; ING Variable Insurance Trust; ING Variable Products Trust; and ING Partners, Inc.

(3)  Shaun Mathews, President, ING USFS Mutual Funds and Investment Products, has held a seat on the Board of Directors of The Mark Twain House & Museum since September 19, 2002. ING Groep N.V. makes non-material, charitable contributions to The Mark Twain House & Museum.

(4)  Messrs. Mathews and Crispin are deemed to be "interested persons" of the Trust as defined in the 1940 Act because of their relationship with ING Groep, the parent corporation of the Adviser, ING Investments, LLC and the Distributor, ING Funds Distributor, LLC.

(5)  ING Funds Distributor, LLC is the sucessor in interest to ING Funds Distributor, Inc., which was previously known as ING Pilgrim Securities, Inc., and before that was known as Pilgrim Securities, Inc., and before that was known as Pilgrim America Securities, Inc.

(6)  ING Funds Services, LLC was previously named ING Pilgrim Group, LLC. ING Pilgrim Group, LLC is the sucessor in interest to ING Pilgrim Group, Inc., which was previously known as Pilgrim Group, Inc. and before that was known as Pilgrim America Group, Inc.

(7)  ING Investments, LLC was previously named ING Pilgrim Investments, LLC. ING Pilgrim Investments, LLC is the sucessor in interest to ING Pilgrim Investments, Inc., which was previously known as Pilgrim Investments, Inc. and before that was known as Pilgrim America Investments, Inc.


64



ING Prime Rate Trust

TRUSTEE AND OFFICER INFORMATION (Unaudited) (continued)

Name, Address
and Age
  Position(s) Held
with the Trust
  Term of Office
and Length of
Time Served(1) 
  Principal
Occupation(s)
during the
Past Five Years
 
Officers:  
Shaun P. Mathews(5)
7337 East Doubletree Ranch Rd.
Scottsdale, Arizona 85258
Age: 52
  President and Chief Executive Officer   November 2006 - Present   President and Chief Executive Officer, ING Investments, LLC(2) and ING Funds Services, LLC(3) (December 2006 - Present); and Head of ING USFS Mutual Funds and Investment Products (November 2004 - November 2006). Formerly, CMO, ING USFS (April 2002 - October 2004); and Head of Rollover/Payout (October 2001 - December 2003).  
Michael J. Roland
7337 East Doubletree Ranch Rd.
Scottsdale, Arizona 85258
Age: 49
  Executive Vice President   February 2002 - Present   Head of Mutual Fund Platform (February 2007 - Present); and Executive Vice President, ING Investments, LLC(2) and ING Funds Services, LLC(3) (December 2001 - Present). Formerly, Head of Product Management (January 2005 - January 2007); Chief Compliance Officer, ING Investments, LLC(2) and Directed Services, LLC(6) (October 2004 - December 2005); and Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, ING Investments, LLC(2) (December 2001 - March 2005).  
Stanley D. Vyner
230 Park Avenue
New York, New York 10169
Age: 57
  Executive Vice President   August 2003 - Present   Executive Vice President, ING Investments, LLC(2) (July 2000 - Present); and Chief Investment Risk Officer, ING Investments, LLC(2) (January 2003 - Present). Formerly, Chief Investment Officer of International Investments (August 2000 - January 2003).  
Joseph M. O'Donnell
7337 East Doubletree Ranch Rd.
Scottsdale, Arizona 85258
Age: 53
  Executive Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer   March 2006 - Present
November 2004 - Present
  Chief Compliance Officer of the ING Funds (November 2004 - Present), ING Investments, LLC(2) and Directed Services, LLC(6) (March 2006 - Present); and Executive Vice President of the ING Funds (March 2006 - Present). Formerly, Chief Compliance Officer of ING Life Insurance and Annuity Company (March 2006 - December 2006); Vice President, Chief Legal Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer and Secretary of Atlas Securities, Inc., Atlas Advisers, Inc. and Atlas Funds (October 2001 - October 2004).  
Todd Modic
7337 East Doubletree Ranch Rd.
Scottsdale, Arizona 85258
Age: 40
  Senior Vice President, Chief/Principal Financial Officer and Assistant Secretary   March 2005 - Present   Senior Vice President, ING Funds Services, LLC(3) (April 2005 - Present). Formerly, Vice President, ING Funds Services, LLC(3) (September 2002 - March 2005); and Director of Financial Reporting, ING Investments, LLC(2) (March 2001 - September 2002).  
Daniel A. Norman
7337 E. Doubletree Ranch Rd.
Scottsdale, Arizona 85258
Age: 50
  Senior Vice President and Treasurer   April 1995 - Present
June 1997 - Present
  Senior Vice President and Group Head, ING Senior Debt Group, ING Investment Management Co. (January 2000 - Present).  
Jeffrey A. Bakalar
7337 E. Doubletree Ranch Rd.
Scottsdale, Arizona 85258
Age: 48
  Senior Vice President   November 1999 - Present   Senior Vice President and Group Head, ING Senior Debt Group, ING Investment Management Co. (January 2000 - Present).  
Elliot Rosen
7337 E. Doubletree Ranch Rd.
Scottsdale, Arizona 85258
Age: 54
  Senior Vice President   May 2002 - Present   Senior Vice President in the Senior Floating Rate Loan Group, ING Investment Management Co. (February 1999 - Present).  

 


65



ING Prime Rate Trust

TRUSTEE AND OFFICER INFORMATION (Unaudited) (continued)

Name, Address
and Age
  Position(s) Held
with the Trust
  Term of Office
and Length of
Time Served(1) 
  Principal
Occupation(s)
during the
Past Five Years
 
William H. Rivoir III
7337 E. Doubletree Ranch Rd.
Scottsdale, Arizona 85258
Age: 57
  Senior Vice President and Assistant Secretary   February 2001 - Present   Senior Vice President, ING Investment Management Co. (January 2004 - Present). Formerly, Counsel, ING USFS Law Department (January 2003 - December 2003); and Senior Vice President, ING Investments, LLC (June 1998 - December 2002).  
Curtis F. Lee
7337 E. Doubletree Ranch Rd.
Scottsdale, Arizona 85258
Age: 53
  Senior Vice President and Chief Credit Officer   February 2001 - Present   Senior Vice President and Chief Credit Officer in the Senior Floating Rate Loan Group, ING Investment Management Co. (January 2001 - Present).  
Kimberly A. Anderson
7337 East Doubletree Ranch Rd.
Scottsdale, Arizona 85258
Age: 43
  Senior Vice President   November 2003 - Present   Senior Vice President, ING Investments, LLC(2) (October 2003 - Present). Formerly, Vice President and Assistant Secretary, ING Investments, LLC(2) (January 2001 - October 2003).  
Robert Terris
7337 East Doubletree Ranch Rd.
Scottsdale, Arizona 85258
Age: 37
  Senior Vice President   May 2006 - Present   Senior Vice President, Head of Division Operations, ING Funds (May 2006 - Present); and Vice President, Head of Division Operations, ING Funds Services, LLC(3) (March 2006 - Present). Formerly, Vice President of Administration, ING Funds Services, LLC(3) (October 2001 - March 2006).  
Robyn L. Ichilov
7337 East Doubletree Ranch Rd.
Scottsdale, Arizona 85258
Age: 40
  Vice President   November 1997 - Present   Vice President and Treasurer, ING Funds Services, LLC(3) (October 2001 - Present) and ING Investments, LLC(2) (August 1997 - Present).  
Lauren D. Bensinger
7337 East Doubletree Ranch Rd.
Scottsdale, Arizona 85258
Age: 54
  Vice President   August 2003 - Present   Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer, ING Funds Distributor, LLC(4) (July 1995 - Present); and Vice President, ING Investments, LLC(2) (February 1996 - Present); and Director of Compliance, ING Investments, LLC(2) (October 2004 - Present). Formerly, Chief Compliance Officer, ING Investments, LLC(2) (October 2001 - October 2004).  
William Evans
10 State House Square
Hartford, Connecticut 06103
Age: 35
  Vice President   September 2007 - Present   Vice President, Head of Mutual Fund Advisory Group (April 2007 - Present), Vice President, U.S. Mutual Funds and Investment Products (May 2005 - April 2007), Senior Fund Analyst, U.S. Mutual Funds and Investment Products (May 2002 - May 2005)  
Maria M. Anderson
7337 East Doubletree Ranch Rd.
Scottsdale, Arizona 85258
Age: 49
  Vice President   September 2004 - Present   Vice President, ING Funds Services, LLC(3) (September 2004 - Present). Formerly, Assistant Vice President, ING Funds Services, LLC(3) (October 2001 - September 2004); and Manager of Fund Accounting and Fund Compliance, ING Investments, LLC(2) (September 1999 - October 2001).  
Denise Lewis
7337 East Doubletree Ranch Rd.
Scottsdale, Arizona 85258
Age: 44
  Vice President   January 2007 - Present   Vice President, ING Funds Services, LLC (December 2006 - Present). Formerly, Senior Vice President, UMB Investment Services Group, LLC - November 2003 - December 2006); and Vice President, Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC (December 2000 - August 2003).  

 


66



ING Prime Rate Trust

TRUSTEE AND OFFICER INFORMATION (Unaudited) (continued)

Name, Address
and Age
  Position(s) Held
with the Trust
  Term of Office
and Length of
Time Served(1) 
  Principal
Occupation(s)
during the
Past Five Years
 
Kimberly K. Palmer
7337 East Doubletree Ranch Rd.
Scottsdale, Arizona 85258
Age: 50
  Vice President   March 2006 - Present   Vice President, ING Funds Services, LLC(3) (March 2006 - Present). Formerly, Assistant Vice President, ING Funds Services, LLC(3) (August 2004 - March 2006); Manager, Registration Statements, ING Funds Services, LLC(3) (May 2003 - August 2004); Associate Partner, AMVESCAP PLC (October 2000 - May 2003); and Director of Federal Filings and Blue Sky Filings, INVESCO Funds Group, Inc. (March 1994 - May 2003).  
Susan P. Kinens
7337 East Doubletree Ranch Rd.
Scottsdale, Arizona 85258
Age: 31
  Assistant Vice President   February 2003 - Present   Assistant Vice President, ING Funds Services, LLC(3) (December 2002 - Present); and has held various other positions with ING Funds Services, LLC(3) for more than the last five years.  
Huey P. Falgout, Jr.
7337 East Doubletree Ranch Rd.
Scottsdale, Arizona 85258
Age: 44
  Secretary   August 2003 - Present   Chief Counsel, ING Americas, U.S. Legal Services (September 2003 - Present). Formerly, Counsel, ING Americas, U.S. Legal Services (November 2002 - September 2003); and Associate General Counsel of AIG American General (January 1999 - November 2002).  
Theresa K. Kelety
7337 East Doubletree Ranch Rd.
Scottsdale, Arizona 85258
Age: 45
  Assistant Secretary   August 2003 - Present   Senior Counsel, ING Americas, U.S. Legal Services (April 2003 - Present). Formerly, Senior Associate with Shearman & Sterling (February 2000 - April 2003).  

 

(1)  The officers hold office until the next annual meeting of the Trustees and until their successors shall have been elected and qualified.

(2)  ING Investments, LLC was previously named ING Pilgrim Investments, LLC. ING Pilgrim Investments, LLC is the sucessor in interest to ING Pilgrim Investments, Inc., which was previously known as Pilgrim Investments, Inc. and before that was known as Pilgrim America Investments, Inc.

(3)  ING Funds Services, LLC was previously named ING Pilgrim Group, LLC. ING Pilgrim Group, LLC is the sucessor in interest to ING Pilgrim Group, Inc., which was previously known as Pilgrim Group, Inc. and before that was known as Pilgrim America Group, Inc.

(4)  ING Funds Distributor, LLC is the sucessor in interest to ING Funds Distributor, Inc., which was previously known as ING Pilgrim Securities, Inc., and before that was known as Pilgrim Securities, Inc., and before that was known as Pilgrim America Securities, Inc.

(5)  Mr. Mathews commenced services as CEO and President of the ING Funds on November 11, 2006.

(6)  Directed Services, LLC is the sucessor in interest to Directed Services, Inc.


67




Investment Adviser

ING Investments, LLC

7337 East Doubletree Ranch Road

Scottsdale, Arizona 85258

Sub-Adviser

ING Investment Management Co.

230 Park Avenue

New York, NY 10169

Institutional Investors and Analysts

Call ING Prime Rate Trust

1-800-336-3436, Extension 2217

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

KPMG LLP

99 High Street

Boston, Massachusetts 02110

Administrator

ING Funds Services, LLC

7337 East Doubletree Ranch Road

Scottsdale, Arizona 85258

1-800-992-0180

Written Requests

Please mail all account inquiries and other comments to:

ING Prime Rate Trust Account

c/o ING Fund Services, LLC

7337 East Doubletree Ranch Road

Scottsdale, Arizona 85258

Distributor

ING Funds Distributor, LLC

7337 East Doubletree Ranch Road

Scottsdale, Arizona 85258

1-800-334-3444

Transfer Agent

DST Systems, Inc.

P.O. Box 219368

Kansas City, Missouri 64141

Custodian

State Street Bank and Trust Company

801 Pennsylvania Avenue

Kansas City, Missouri 64105

Legal Counsel

Dechert LLP

1775 I Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20006

Toll-Free Shareholder Information

Call us from 9:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Eastern time on any business day for account or other information, at (800)-992-0180

For more complete information, or to obtain a prospectus on any ING fund, please call your Investment Professional or ING Funds Distributor, LLC at (800) 992-0180 or log on to www.ingfunds.com. The prospectus should be read carefully before investing. Consider the Trust's investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses carefully before investing. The prospectus contains this information and other information about the Trust.

PRAR-UPRT     (0208-042508)




 

Item 2. Code of Ethics.

 

As of the end of the period covered by this report, Registrant had adopted a code of ethics, as defined in Item 2 of Form N-CSR, that applies to the Registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer.  There were no amendments to the Code during the period covered by the report.  The Registrant did not grant any waivers, including implicit waivers, from any provisions of the Code during the period covered by this report.  The code of ethics is filed herewith pursuant to Item 10(a)(1), Exhibit 99.CODE ETH.

 

Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert.

 

The Board of Trustees has determined that J.Michael Earley is an audit committee financial expert, as defined in Item 3 of Form N-CSR.  Mr. Earley is “independent” for purposes of Item 3 of Form N-CSR.

 

Item 4.  Principal Accountant Fees and Services.

 

(a)                                  Audit Fees:  The aggregate fees billed for each of the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered by KPMG LLP (“KPMG”), the principal accountant for the audit of the registrant’s annual financial statements, for services that are normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for those fiscal years were $66,000 for year ended February 29, 2008 and $68,750 for year ended February 28, 2007.

 

(b)                                 Audit-Related Fees:  The aggregate fees billed in each of the last two fiscal years for assurance and related services by KPMG that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit of the registrant’s financial statements and are not reported under paragraph (a) of this Item were $35,075 for the year ended February 29, 2008 and $33,125 for the year ended February 28, 2007.

 

(c)                                  Tax Fees:  The aggregate fees billed in each of the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered by KPMG for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning were $8,749 in the year ended February 29, 2008 and $8,838 in the year ended February 28, 2007.  Such services included review of excise distribution calculations (if applicable), preparation of the Funds’ federal, state and excise tax returns, tax services related to mergers and routine consulting.

 

(d)                                 All Other Fees:  None

 

(e) (1)                 Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

 

2



 

AUDIT AND NON-AUDIT SERVICES
PRE-APPROVAL POLICY

 

I.              Statement of Principles

 

Under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Act”), the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors or Trustees (the “Committee”) of the ING Funds (each a “Fund,” collectively, the “Funds”) set out on Exhibit A to this Audit and Non-Audit Services Pre-Approval Policy (“Policy”) is responsible for the oversight of the work of the Funds’ independent auditors. As part of its responsibilities, the Committee must pre-approve the audit and non-audit services performed by the auditors in order to assure that the provision of these services does not impair the auditors’ independence from the Funds. The Committee has adopted, and the Board has ratified, this Policy, which sets out the procedures and conditions under which the services of the independent auditors may be pre-approved.

 

Under Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules promulgated in accordance with the Act, the Funds may establish two different approaches to pre-approving audit and non-audit services. The Committee may approve services without consideration of specific case-by-case services (“general pre-approval”) or it may pre-approve specific services (“specific pre-approval”). The Committee believes that the combination of these approaches contemplated in this Policy results in an effective and efficient method for pre-approving audit and non-audit services to be performed by the Funds’ independent auditors. Under this Policy, services that are not of a type that may receive general pre-approval require specific pre-approval by the Committee. Any proposed services that exceed pre-approved cost levels or budgeted amounts will also require the Committee’s specific pre-approval.

 

For both types of approval, the Committee considers whether the subject services are consistent with the SEC’s rules on auditor independence and that such services are compatible with maintaining the auditors independence. The Committee also considers whether a particular audit firm is in the best position to provide effective and efficient services to the Funds. Reasons that the auditors are in the best position include the auditors’ familiarity with the Funds’ business, personnel, culture, accounting systems, risk profile, and other factors, and whether the services will enhance the Funds’ ability to manage and control risk or improve audit quality. Such factors will be considered as a whole, with no one factor being determinative.

 

The appendices attached to this Policy describe the audit, audit-related, tax-related, and other services that have the Committee’s general pre-approval. For any service that has been approved through general pre-approval, the general pre-approval will remain in place for a period 12 months from the date of pre-approval, unless the Committee determines that a different period is appropriate. The Committee will annually review and pre-approve the services that may be provided by the independent auditors without specific pre-approval. The Committee will revise the list of services subject to general pre-approval as appropriate. This Policy does not serve as a delegation to Fund management of the Committee’s duty to pre-approve services performed by the Funds’ independent auditors.

 



 

II.            Audit Services

 

The annual audit services engagement terms and fees are subject to the Committee’s specific pre-approval. Audit services are those services that are normally provided by auditors in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements or those that generally only independent auditors can reasonably provide. They include the Funds’ annual financial statement audit and procedures that the independent auditors must perform in order to form an opinion on the Funds’ financial statements (e.g., information systems and procedural reviews and testing). The Committee will monitor the audit services engagement and approve any changes in terms, conditions or fees deemed by the Committee to be necessary or appropriate.

 

The Committee may grant general pre-approval to other audit services, such as statutory audits and services associated with SEC registration statements, periodic reports and other documents filed with the SEC or issued in connection with securities offerings.

 

The Committee has pre-approved the audit services listed on Appendix A. The Committee must specifically approve all audit services not listed on Appendix A.

 

III.           Audit-related Services

 

Audit-related services are assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or the review of the Funds’ financial statements or are traditionally performed by the independent auditors. The Committee believes that the provision of audit-related services will not impair the independent auditors’ independence, and therefore may grant pre-approval to audit-related services. Audit-related services include accounting consultations related to accounting, financial reporting or disclosure matters not classified as “audit services;” assistance with understanding and implementing new accounting and financial reporting guidance from rulemaking authorities; agreed-upon or expanded audit procedures relating to accounting and/or billing records required to respond to or comply with financial, accounting or regulatory reporting matters; and assistance with internal control reporting requirements under Form N-SAR or Form N-CSR.

 

The Committee has pre-approved the audit-related services listed on Appendix B. The Committee must specifically approve all audit-related services not listed on Appendix B.

 

IV.           Tax Services

 

The Committee believes the independent auditors can provide tax services to the Funds, including tax compliance, tax planning, and tax advice, without compromising the auditors’ independence. Therefore, the Committee may grant general pre-approval with respect to tax services historically provided by the Funds’ independent auditors that do not, in the Committee’s view, impair auditor independence and that are consistent with the SEC’s rules on auditor independence.

 

The Committee will not grant pre-approval if the independent auditors initially recommends a transaction the sole business purpose of which is tax avoidance and the tax treatment of which may not be supported in the Internal Revenue Code and related regulations. The Committee may consult

 

2



 

outside counsel to determine that tax planning and reporting positions are consistent with this Policy.

 

The Committee has pre-approved the tax-related services listed on Appendix C. The Committee must specifically approve all tax-related services not listed on Appendix C.

 

V.            Other Services

 

The Committee believes it may grant approval of non-audit services that are permissible services for independent auditors to a Fund. The Committee has determined to grant general pre-approval to other services that it believes are routine and recurring, do not impair auditor independence, and are consistent with SEC rules on auditor independence.

 

The Committee has pre-approved the non-audit services listed on Appendix D. The Committee must specifically approve all non-audit services not listed on Appendix D.

 

A list of the SEC’s prohibited non-audit services is attached to this Policy as Appendix E. The SEC’s rules and relevant guidance should be consulted to determine the precise definitions of these impermissible services and the applicability of exceptions to certain of the SEC’s prohibitions.

 

VI.           Pre-approval of Fee levels and Budgeted Amounts

 

The Committee will annually establish pre-approval fee levels or budgeted amounts for audit, audit-related, tax and non-audit services to be provided to the Funds by the independent auditors. Any proposed services exceeding these levels or amounts require the Committee’s specific pre-approval. The Committee considers fees for audit and non-audit services when deciding whether to pre-approve services. The Committee may determine, for a pre-approval period of 12 months, the appropriate ratio between the total amount of fees for the Fund’s audit, audit-related, and tax services (including fees for services provided to Fund affiliates that are subject to pre-approval), and the total amount of fees for certain permissible non-audit services for the Fund classified as other services (including any such services provided to Fund affiliates that are subject to pre-approval).

 

VII.         Procedures

 

Requests or applications for services to be provided by the independent auditors will be submitted to management. If management determines that the services do not fall within those services generally pre-approved by the Committee and set out in the appendices to these procedures, management will submit the services to the Committee or its delagee. Any such submission will include a detailed description of the services to be rendered. Notwithstanding this paragraph, the Committee will, on a quarterly basis, receive from the independent auditors a list of services provided for the previous calendar quarter on a cumulative basis by the auditors during the Pre-Approval Period.

 

3



 

VIII.        Delegation

 

The Committee may delegate pre-approval authority to one or more of the Committee’s members. Any member or members to whom such pre-approval authority is delegated must report any pre-approval decisions, including any pre-approved services, to the Committee at its next scheduled meeting. The Committee will identify any member to whom pre-approval authority is delegated in writing. The member will retain such authority for a period of 12 months from the date of pre-approval unless the Committee determines that a different period is appropriate. The period of delegated authority may be terminated by the Committee or at the option of the member.

 

IX.           Additional Requirements

 

The Committee will take any measures the Committee deems necessary or appropriate to oversee the work of the independent auditors and to assure the auditors’ independence from the Funds. This may include reviewing a formal written statement from the independent auditors delineating all relationships between the auditors and the Funds, consistent with Independence Standards Board No. 1, and discussing with the auditors their methods and procedures for ensuring independence.

 

Last Approved:  November 29, 2007

 

4



 

Appendix A
Pre-Approved Audit Services for the Pre-Approval Period January 1, 2008 through December 31, 2008

 

Service

 

The Fund(s)

 

Fee Range

 

 

 

 

 

Statutory audits or financial audits (including tax services associated with audit services)

 

Ö

 

As presented to Audit Committee (1)

 

 

 

 

 

Services associated with SEC registration statements, periodic reports and other documents filed with the SEC or other documents issued in connection with securities offerings (e.g., consents), and assistance in responding to SEC comment letters.

 

Ö

 

Not to exceed $9,750 per filing

 

 

 

 

 

Consultations by Fund management with respect to accounting or disclosure treatment of transactions or events and/or the actual or potential effect of final or proposed rules, standards or interpretations by the SEC, Financial Accounting Standards Board, or other regulatory or standard setting bodies.

 

Ö

 

Not to exceed $8,000 during the Pre-Approval
Period

 

 

 

 

 

Seed capital audit and related review and issuance of consent on the N-2 registration statement

 

Ö

 

Not to exceed $12,600 per audit

 


(1)           For new Funds launched during the Pre-Approval Period, the fee ranges pre-approved will be the same as those for existing Funds, pro-rated in accordance with inception dates as provided in the auditors’ Proposal or any Engagement Letter covering the period at issue.  Fees in the Engagement Letter will be controlling.

 

5



 

Appendix B
Pre-Approved Audit-Related Services for the Pre-Approval Period January 1, 2008 through December 31, 2008

 

Service

 

The Fund(s)

 

Fund Affiliates

 

Fee Range

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Services related to Fund mergers (Excludes tax services - See Appendix C for tax services associated with Fund mergers)

 

Ö

 

Ö

 

Not to exceed $10,000 per merger

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consultations by Fund management with respect to accounting or disclosure treatment of transactions or events and/or the actual or potential effect of final or proposed rules, standards or interpretations by the SEC, Financial Accounting Standards Board, or other regulatory or standard setting bodies. [Note:  Under SEC rules some consultations may be “audit” services and others may be “audit-related” services.]

 

Ö

 

 

 

Not to exceed $5,000 per occurrence during the Pre-Approval Period

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Review of the Funds’ semi-annual financial statements

 

Ö

 

 

 

Not to exceed $2,200 per set of financial statements per fund

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reports to regulatory or government agencies related to the annual engagement

 

Ö

 

 

 

Up to $5,000 per occurrence during the Pre-Approval Period

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regulatory compliance assistance

 

Ö

 

Ö

 

Not to exceed $5,000 per quarter

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Training courses

 

 

 

Ö

 

Not to exceed $2,000 per course

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For Prime Rate Trust, agreed upon procedures for quarterly reports to rating agencies

 

Ö

 

 

 

Not to exceed $9,450 per quarter

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For Prime Rate Trust and Senior Income Fund, agreed upon procedures for the Revolving Credit and Security Agreement with Citigroup

 

Ö

 

 

 

Not to exceed $21,000 per fund per year

 

6



 

Appendix C
Pre-Approved Tax Services for the Pre-Approval Period January 1, 2008 through December 31, 2008

 

Service

 

The Fund(s)

 

Fund
Affiliates

 

Fee Range

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Preparation of federal and state income tax returns and federal excise tax returns for the Funds including assistance and review with excise tax distributions

 

Ö

 

 

 

As presented to Audit Committee (2)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Review of IRC Sections 851(b) and 817(h) diversification testing on a real-time basis

 

Ö

 

 

 

As presented to Audit Committee (2)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assistance and advice regarding year-end reporting for 1099’s

 

Ö

 

 

 

As presented to Audit Committee (2)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tax assistance and advice regarding statutory, regulatory or administrative developments

 

Ö

 

Ö

 

Not to exceed $5,000 for the Funds or for the Funds’ investment adviser during the Pre-Approval Period

 


(2)           For new Funds launched during the Pre-Approval Period, the fee ranges pre-approved will be the same as those for existing Funds, pro-rated in accordance with inception dates as provided in the auditors’ Proposal or any Engagement Letter covering the period at issue.  Fees in the Engagement Letter will be controlling.

 

7



 

Service

 

The Fund(s)

 

Fund
Affiliates

 

Fee Range

Tax training courses

 

 

 

Ö

 

Not to exceed $2,000 per course during the Pre-Approval Period

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tax services associated with Fund mergers

 

Ö

 

Ö

 

Not to exceed $4,000 per fund per merger during the Pre-Approval Period

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other tax-related assistance and consultation, including, without limitation, assistance in evaluating derivative financial instruments and international tax issues, qualification and distribution issues, and similar routine tax consultations.

 

Ö

 

 

 

Not to exceed $120,000 during the Pre-Approval Period

 

8



 

Appendix D
Pre-Approved Other Services for the Pre-Approval Period January 1, 2008 through December 31, 2008

 

Service

 

The Fund(s)

 

Fund Affiliates

 

Fee Range

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Agreed-upon procedures for Class B share 12b-1 programs

 

 

 

Ö

 

Not to exceed $50,000 during the Pre-Approval Period

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Security counts performed pursuant to Rule 17f-2 of the 1940 Act (i.e., counts for Funds holding securities with affiliated sub-custodians)

Cost to be borne 50% by the Funds and 50% by ING Investments, LLC.

 

Ö

 

Ö

 

Not to exceed $5,000 per Fund during the Pre-Approval Period

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Agreed upon procedures for 15 (c) FACT Books

 

Ö

 

 

 

Not to exceed $35,000 during the Pre-Approval Period

 

9



 

Appendix E

 

Prohibited Non-Audit Services

Dated:            January 1, 2008

 

      Bookkeeping or other services related to the accounting records or financial statements of the Funds

 

      Financial information systems design and implementation

 

      Appraisal or valuation services, fairness opinions, or contribution-in-kind reports

 

      Actuarial services

 

      Internal audit outsourcing services

 

      Management functions

 

      Human resources

 

      Broker-dealer, investment adviser, or investment banking services

 

      Legal services

 

      Expert services unrelated to the audit

 

      Any other service that the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board determines, by regulation, is impermissible

 

10



 

EXHIBIT A

 

ING EQUITY TRUST

ING FUNDS TRUST

ING ASIA PACIFIC HIGH DIVIDEND EQUITY INCOME FUND

ING GLOBAL ADVANTAGE AND PREMIUM OPPORTUNITY FUND

ING GLOBAL EQUITY DIVIDEND AND PREMIUM OPPORTUNITY FUND

ING INTERNATIONAL HIGH DIVIDEND EQUITY INCOME FUND

ING RISK MANAGED NATURAL RESOURCES FUND

ING INVESTMENT FUNDS, INC.

ING INVESTORS TRUST

ING MAYFLOWER TRUST

ING MUTUAL FUNDS

ING PARTNERS, INC.

ING PRIME RATE TRUST

ING SENIOR INCOME FUND

ING SEPARATE PORTFOLIOS TRUST

ING VARIABLE INSURANCE TRUST

ING VARIABLE PRODUCTS TRUST

 



 

(e) (2)      Percentage of services referred to in 4(b) — (4)(d) that were approved by the audit committee 

 

                100% of the services were approved by the audit committee.

 

(f)            Percentage of hours expended attributable to work performed by other than full time employees of KPMG if greater than 50%.

 

Not applicable.

 

(g)           Non-Audit Fees:  The non-audit fees billed by the registrant’s accountant for services rendered to the registrant, and rendered to the registrant’s investment adviser, and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant for each of the last two fiscal years of the registrant were $1,394,538 for year ended February 29, 2008 and $898,238 for fiscal year ended February 28, 2007.

 

(h)           Principal Accountants Independence:  The Registrant’s Audit committee has considered whether the provision of non-audit services that were rendered to the registrant’s investment adviser and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the investment adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant that were not pre-approved pursuant to Rule 2-01(c)(7)(ii) of Regulation S-X is compatible with maintaining KPMG’s independence.

 

3



 

Item 5.  Audit Committee of Listed Registrants.

 

a.             The registrant has a separately-designated standing audit committee.  The members are J. Michael Earley, Patricia
W. Chadwick and Peter S. Drotch.

 

b.             Not applicable.

 

Item 6.  Schedule of Investments

 

Schedule is included as part of the report to shareholders filed under Item 1 of this Form.

 

Item 7.  Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment companies.

 



 

ING FUNDS

 

PROXY VOTING PROCEDURES AND GUIDELINES

 

Effective Date:  July 10, 2003

Revision Date:  March 27, 2008

 

I.                                         INTRODUCTION

 

The following are the Proxy Voting Procedures and Guidelines (the “Procedures and Guidelines”) of the ING Funds set forth on Exhibit 1 attached hereto and each portfolio or series thereof, except for any “Sub-Adviser-Voted Series” identified on Exhibit 1 and further described in Section III below (each non-Sub-Adviser-Voted Series hereinafter referred to as a “Fund” and collectively, the “Funds”).  The purpose of these Procedures and Guidelines is to set forth the process by which each Fund subject to these Procedures and Guidelines will vote proxies related to the equity assets in its investment portfolio (the “portfolio securities”).  The Procedures and Guidelines have been approved by the Funds’ Boards of Trustees/Directors(1) (each a “Board” and collectively, the “Boards”), including a majority of the independent Trustees/Directors(2) of the Board.  These Procedures and Guidelines may be amended only by the Board.  The Board shall review these Procedures and Guidelines at its discretion, and make any revisions thereto as deemed appropriate by the Board.

 

II.                                     COMPLIANCE COMMITTEE

 

The Boards hereby delegate to the Compliance Committee of each Board (each a “Committee” and collectively, the “Committees”) the authority and responsibility to oversee the implementation of these Procedures and Guidelines, and where applicable, to make determinations on behalf of the Board with respect to the voting of proxies on behalf of each Fund.  Furthermore, the Boards hereby delegate to each Committee the authority to review and approve material changes to proxy voting procedures of any Fund’s investment adviser (the “Adviser”).  The Proxy Voting Procedures of the Adviser (the “Adviser Procedures”) are attached hereto as Exhibit 2.  Any determination regarding the voting of proxies of each Fund that is made by a Committee, or any member thereof, as permitted herein, shall be deemed to be a good faith determination regarding the voting of proxies by the full Board.  Each Committee

 


(1)

 

Reference in these Procedures to one or more Funds shall, as applicable, mean those Funds that are under the jurisdiction of the particular Board or Compliance Committee at issue. No provision in these Procedures is intended to impose any duty upon the particular Board or Compliance Committee with respect to any other Fund.

 

 

 

(2)

 

The independent Trustees/Directors are those Board members who are not “interested persons” of the Funds within the meaning of Section 2(a)(19) of the Investment Company Act of 1940.

 



 

may rely on the Adviser through the Agent, Proxy Coordinator and/or Proxy Group (as such terms are defined for purposes of the Adviser Procedures) to deal in the first instance with the application of these Procedures and Guidelines.  Each Committee shall conduct itself in accordance with its charter.

 

III.                                 DELEGATION OF VOTING AUTHORITY

 

Except as otherwise provided for herein, the Board hereby delegates to the Adviser to each Fund the authority and responsibility to vote all proxies with respect to all portfolio securities of the Fund in accordance with then current proxy voting procedures and guidelines that have been approved by the Board.  The Board may revoke such delegation with respect to any proxy or proposal, and assume the responsibility of voting any Fund proxy or proxies as it deems appropriate.  Non-material amendments to the Procedures and Guidelines may be approved for immediate implementation by the President or Chief Financial Officer of a Fund, subject to ratification at the next regularly scheduled meeting of the Compliance Committee.

 

A Board may elect to delegate the voting of proxies to the Sub-Adviser of a portfolio or series of the ING Funds.  In so doing, the Board shall also approve the Sub-Adviser’s proxy policies for implementation on behalf of such portfolio or series (a “Sub-Adviser-Voted Series”).  Sub-Adviser-Voted Series shall not be covered under these Procedures and Guidelines but rather shall be covered by such Sub-Adviser’s proxy policies, provided that the Board, including a majority of the independent Trustees/Directors(1), has approved them on behalf of such Sub-Adviser-Voted Series.

 

When a Fund participates in the lending of its securities and the securities are on loan at record date, proxies related to such securities will not be forwarded to the Adviser by the Fund’s custodian and therefore will not be voted.  However, the Adviser shall use best efforts to recall or restrict specific securities from loan for the purpose of facilitating a “material” vote as described in the Adviser Procedures.

 

Funds that are “funds-of-funds” will “echo” vote their interests in underlying mutual funds, which may include ING Funds (or portfolios or series thereof) other than those set forth on Exhibit 1 attached hereto.  This means that, if the fund-of-funds must vote on a proposal with respect to an underlying investment company, the fund-of-funds will vote its interest in that underlying fund in the same proportion all other shareholders in the investment company voted their interests.

 

A fund that is a “feeder” fund in a master-feeder structure does not echo vote.  Rather, it passes votes requested by the underlying master fund to its shareholders.  This means that, if the feeder fund is solicited by the master fund, it will request instructions from its own shareholders, either directly or, in the case of an insurance-dedicated Fund, through an insurance product or retirement plan, as to the manner in which to vote its interest in an underlying master fund.

 


(1)

 

The independent Trustees/Directors are those Board members who are not “interested persons” of the Funds within the meaning of Section 2(a)(19) of the Investment Company Act of 1940.

 

2



 

When a Fund is a feeder in a master-feeder structure, proxies for the portfolio securities owned by the master fund will be voted pursuant to the master fund’s proxy voting policies and procedures.  As such, and except as otherwise noted herein with respect to vote reporting requirements, feeder Funds shall not be subject to these Procedures and Guidelines.

 

IV.                                APPROVAL AND REVIEW OF PROCEDURES

 

Each Fund’s Adviser has adopted proxy voting procedures in connection with the voting of portfolio securities for the Funds as attached hereto in Exhibit 2.  The Board hereby approves such procedures.  All material changes to the Adviser Procedures must be approved by the Board or the Compliance Committee prior to implementation; however, the President or Chief Financial Officer of a Fund may make such non-material changes as they deem appropriate, subject to ratification by the Board or the Compliance Committee at its next regularly scheduled meeting.

 

V.                                    VOTING PROCEDURES AND GUIDELINES

 

The Guidelines that are set forth in Exhibit 3 hereto specify the manner in which the Funds generally will vote with respect to the proposals discussed therein.

 

Unless otherwise noted, the defined terms used hereafter shall have the same meaning as defined in the Adviser Procedures

 

A.                                   Routine Matters
 

The Agent shall be instructed to submit a vote in accordance with the Guidelines where such Guidelines provide a clear “For,” “Against,” “Withhold” or “Abstain” on a proposal.  However, the Agent shall be directed to refer any proxy proposal to the Proxy Coordinator for instructions as if it were a matter requiring case-by-case consideration under circumstances where the application of the Guidelines is unclear, it appears to involve unusual or controversial issues, or an Investment Professional (as such term is defined for purposes of the Adviser Procedures) recommends a vote contrary to the Guidelines.

 

B.                                     Matters Requiring Case-by-Case Consideration

 

The Agent shall be directed to refer proxy proposals accompanied by its written analysis and voting recommendation to the Proxy Coordinator where the Guidelines have noted “case-by-case” consideration.

 

Upon receipt of a referral from the Agent, the Proxy Coordinator may solicit additional research from the Agent, Investment Professional(s), as well as from any other source or service.

 

Except in cases in which the Proxy Group has previously provided the Proxy Coordinator

 

3



 

with standing instructions to vote in accordance with the Agent’s recommendation, the Proxy Coordinator will forward the Agent’s analysis and recommendation and/or any research obtained from the Investment Professional(s), the Agent or any other source to the Proxy Group.  The Proxy Group may consult with the Agent and/or Investment Professional(s), as it deems necessary.

 

The Proxy Coordinator shall use best efforts to convene the Proxy Group with respect to all matters requiring its consideration.  In the event quorum requirements cannot be timely met in connection with a voting deadline, it shall be the policy of the Funds to vote in accordance with the Agent’s recommendation, unless the Agent’s recommendation is deemed to be conflicted as provided for under the Adviser Procedures, in which case no action shall be taken on such matter (i.e., a “Non-Vote”).

 

1.

 

Within-Guidelines Votes: Votes in Accordance with a Fund’s Guidelines and/or, where applicable, Agent Recommendation

 

In the event the Proxy Group, and where applicable, any Investment Professional participating in the voting process, recommend a vote Within Guidelines, the Proxy Group will instruct the Agent, through the Proxy Coordinator, to vote in this manner.  Except as provided for herein, no Conflicts Report (as such term is defined for purposes of the Adviser Procedures) is required in connection with Within-Guidelines Votes.

 

2.

 

Non-Votes:  Votes in Which No Action is Taken

 

The Proxy Group may recommend that a Fund refrain from voting under circumstances including, but not limited to, the following:  (1) if the economic effect on shareholders’ interests or the value of the portfolio holding is indeterminable or insignificant, e.g., proxies in connection with fractional shares, securities no longer held in the portfolio of an ING Fund or proxies being considered on behalf of a Fund that is no longer in existence; or (2) if the cost of voting a proxy outweighs the benefits, e.g., certain international proxies, particularly in cases in which share blocking practices may impose trading restrictions on the relevant portfolio security.  In such instances, the Proxy Group may instruct the Agent, through the Proxy Coordinator, not to vote such proxy.  The Proxy Group may provide the Proxy Coordinator with standing instructions on parameters that would dictate a Non-Vote without the Proxy Group’s review of a specific proxy.  It is noted a Non-Vote determination would generally not be made in connection with voting rights received pursuant to class action participation; while a Fund may no longer hold the security, a continuing economic effect on shareholders’ interests is likely.

 

Reasonable efforts shall be made to secure and vote all other proxies for the Funds, but, particularly in markets in which shareholders’ rights are limited, Non-Votes may also occur in connection with a Fund’s related inability to timely

 

4



 

access ballots or other proxy information in connection with its portfolio securities.

 

Non-Votes may also result in certain cases in which the Agent’s recommendation has been deemed to be conflicted, as described in V.B. above and V.B.4. below.

 

3.

 

Out-of-Guidelines Votes: Votes Contrary to Procedures and Guidelines, or Agent Recommendation, where applicable, Where No Recommendation is Provided by Agent, or Where Agent’s Recommendation is Conflicted

 

If the Proxy Group recommends that a Fund vote contrary to the Procedures and Guidelines, or the recommendation of the Agent, where applicable, if the Agent has made no recommendation on a matter requiring case-by-case consideration and the Procedures and Guidelines are silent, or the Agent’s recommendation on a matter requiring case-by-case consideration is deemed to be conflicted as provided for under the Adviser Procedures, the Proxy Coordinator will then request that all members of the Proxy Group, including any members not in attendance at the meeting at which the relevant proxy is being considered, and each Investment Professional participating in the voting process complete a Conflicts Report (as such term is defined for purposes of the Adviser Procedures).  As provided for in the Adviser Procedures, the Proxy Coordinator shall be responsible for identifying to Counsel potential conflicts of interest with respect to the Agent.

 

If Counsel determines that a conflict of interest appears to exist with respect to the Agent, any member of the Proxy Group or the participating Investment Professional(s), the Proxy Coordinator will then contact the Compliance Committee(s) and forward to such Committee(s) all information relevant to their review, including the following materials or a summary thereof:  the applicable Procedures and Guidelines, the recommendation of the Agent, where applicable, the recommendation of the Investment Professional(s), where applicable, any resources used by the Proxy Group in arriving at its recommendation, the Conflicts Report and any other written materials establishing whether a conflict of interest exists, and findings of Counsel (as such term is defined for purposes of the Adviser Procedures).  Upon Counsel’s finding that a conflict of interest exists with respect to one or more members of the Proxy Group or the Advisers generally, the remaining members of the Proxy Group shall not be required to complete a Conflicts Report in connection with the proxy.

 

If Counsel determines that there does not appear to be a conflict of interest with respect to the Agent, any member of the Proxy Group or the participating Investment Professional(s), the Proxy Coordinator will instruct the Agent to vote the proxy as recommended by the Proxy Group.

 

5



 

4.

 

Referrals to a Fund’s Compliance Committee

 

A Fund’s Compliance Committee may consider all recommendations, analysis, research and Conflicts Reports provided to it by the Agent, Proxy Group and/or Investment Professional(s), and any other written materials used to establish whether a conflict of interest exists, in determining how to vote the proxies referred to the Committee.  The Committee will instruct the Agent through the Proxy Coordinator how to vote such referred proposals.

 

The Proxy Coordinator shall use best efforts to timely refer matters to a Fund’s Committee for its consideration.  In the event any such matter cannot be timely referred to or considered by the Committee, it shall be the policy of the Funds to vote in accordance with the Agent’s recommendation, unless the Agent’s recommendation is conflicted on a matter requiring case-by-case consideration, in which case no action shall be taken on such matter (i.e., a “Non-Vote”).

 

The Proxy Coordinator will maintain a record of all proxy questions that have been referred to a Fund’s Committee, all applicable recommendations, analysis, research and Conflicts Reports.

 

VI.                                CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

 

In all cases in which a vote has not been clearly determined in advance by the Procedures and Guidelines or for which the Proxy Group recommends an Out-of-Guidelines Vote, and Counsel has determined that a conflict of interest appears to exist with respect to the Agent, any member of the Proxy Group, or any Investment Professional participating in the voting process, the proposal shall be referred to the Fund’s Committee for determination so that the Adviser shall have no opportunity to vote a Fund’s proxy in a situation in which it or the Agent may be deemed to have a conflict of interest.  In the event a member of a Fund’s Committee believes he/she has a conflict of interest that would preclude him/her from making a voting determination in the best interests of the beneficial owners of the applicable Fund, such Committee member shall so advise the Proxy Coordinator and recuse himself/herself with respect to determinations regarding the relevant proxy.

 

VII.                            REPORTING AND RECORD RETENTION

 

Annually in August, each Fund will post its proxy voting record or a link thereto, for the prior one-year period ending on June 30th on the ING Funds website.  No proxy voting record will be posted on the ING Funds website for any Fund that is a feeder in a master/feeder structure; however, a cross-reference to that of the master fund’s proxy voting record as filed in the SEC’s EDGAR database will be posted on the ING Funds website.  The proxy voting record for each Fund will also be available in the EDGAR database on the SEC’s website.

 

6



 

EXHIBIT 1

to the

ING Funds

Proxy Voting Procedures

 

ING ASIA PACIFIC HIGH DIVIDEND EQUITY INCOME FUND

ING EQUITY TRUST

ING FUNDS TRUST

ING GLOBAL ADVANTAGE AND PREMIUM OPPORTUNITY FUND

ING GLOBAL EQUITY DIVIDEND AND PREMIUM OPPORTUNITY FUND

ING INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT EQUITY FUND

ING INTERNATIONAL HIGH DIVIDEND EQUITY INCOME FUND

ING INVESTMENT FUNDS, INC.

ING INVESTORS TRUST(1)

ING MAYFLOWER TRUST

ING MUTUAL FUNDS

ING PARTNERS, INC.

ING PRIME RATE TRUST

ING RISK MANAGED NATURAL RESOURCES FUND

ING SENIOR INCOME FUND

ING SEPARATE PORTFOLIOS TRUST

ING VARIABLE INSURANCE TRUST

ING VARIABLE PRODUCTS TRUST

ING VP NATURAL RESOURCES TRUST

 


(1)                  Sub-Adviser-Voted Series:  ING Franklin Mutual Shares Portfolio

 



 

EXHIBIT 2

to the

ING Funds

Proxy Voting Procedures

 

ING INVESTMENTS, LLC,

ING INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT CO.

AND

DIRECTED SERVICES, LLC

 

PROXY VOTING PROCEDURES

 

I.                                         INTRODUCTION

 

ING Investments, LLC, ING Investment Management Co. and Directed Services, LLC (each an “Adviser” and collectively, the “Advisers”) are the investment advisers for the registered investment companies and each series or portfolio thereof (each a “Fund” and collectively, the “Funds”) comprising the ING family of funds.  As such, the Advisers have been delegated the authority to vote proxies with respect to securities for certain Funds over which they have day-to-day portfolio management responsibility.

 

The Advisers will abide by the proxy voting guidelines adopted by a Fund’s respective Board of Directors or Trustees (each a “Board” and collectively, the “Boards”) with regard to the voting of proxies unless otherwise provided in the proxy voting procedures adopted by a Fund’s Board.

 

In voting proxies, the Advisers are guided by general fiduciary principles.  Each must act prudently, solely in the interest of the beneficial owners of the Funds it manages.  The Advisers will not subordinate the interest of beneficial owners to unrelated objectives.  Each Adviser will vote proxies in the manner that it believes will do the most to maximize shareholder value.

 

The following are the Proxy Voting Procedures of ING Investments, LLC, ING Investment Management Co. and Directed Services, LLC (the “Adviser Procedures”) with respect to the voting of proxies on behalf of their client Funds as approved by the respective Board of each Fund.

 

Unless otherwise noted, best efforts shall be used to vote proxies in all instances.

 



 

II.            ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

 

A.                                   Proxy Coordinator

 

The Proxy Coordinator identified in Appendix 1 will assist in the coordination of the voting of each Fund’s proxies in accordance with the ING Funds Proxy Voting Procedures and Guidelines (the “Procedures” or “Guidelines” and collectively the “Procedures and Guidelines”).  The Proxy Coordinator is authorized to direct the Agent to vote a Fund’s proxy in accordance with the Procedures and Guidelines unless the Proxy Coordinator receives a recommendation from an Investment Professional (as described below) to vote contrary to the Procedures and Guidelines.  In such event, and in connection with proxy proposals requiring case-by-case consideration (except in cases in which the Proxy Group has previously provided the Proxy Coordinator with standing instructions to vote in accordance with the Agent’s recommendation), the Proxy Coordinator will call a meeting of the Proxy Group (as described below).

 

Responsibilities assigned herein to the Proxy Coordinator, or activities in support thereof, may be performed by such members of the Proxy Group or employees of the Advisers’ affiliates as are deemed appropriate by the Proxy Group.

 

Unless specified otherwise, information provided to the Proxy Coordinator in connection with duties of the parties described herein shall be deemed delivered to the Advisers.

 

B.                                     Agent

 

An independent proxy voting service (the “Agent”), as approved by the Board of each Fund, shall be engaged to assist in the voting of Fund proxies for publicly traded securities through the provision of vote analysis, implementation, recordkeeping and disclosure services.  The Agent is ISS Governance Services, a unit of RiskMetrics Group, Inc.  The Agent is responsible for coordinating with the Funds’ custodians to ensure that all proxy materials received by the custodians relating to the portfolio securities are processed in a timely fashion.  To the extent applicable, the Agent is required to vote and/or refer all proxies in accordance with these Adviser Procedures.  The Agent will retain a record of all proxy votes handled by the Agent.  Such record must reflect all the information required to be disclosed in a Fund’s Form N-PX pursuant to Rule 30b1-4 under the Investment Company Act.  In addition, the Agent is responsible for maintaining copies of all proxy statements received by issuers and to promptly provide such materials to the Adviser upon request.

 

The Agent shall be instructed to vote all proxies in accordance with a Fund’s Guidelines, except as otherwise instructed through the Proxy Coordinator by the Adviser’s Proxy Group or a Fund’s Compliance Committee (“Committee”).

 

9



 

The Agent shall be instructed to obtain all proxies from the Funds’ custodians and to review each proxy proposal against the Guidelines.  The Agent also shall be requested to call the Proxy Coordinator’s attention to specific proxy proposals that although governed by the Guidelines appear to involve unusual or controversial issues.

 

Subject to the oversight of the Advisers, the Agent shall establish and maintain adequate internal controls and policies in connection with the provision of proxy voting services voting to the Advisers, including methods to reasonably ensure that its analysis and recommendations are not influenced by conflict of interest, and shall disclose such controls and policies to the Advisers when and as provided for herein.  Unless otherwise specified, references herein to recommendations of the Agent shall refer to those in which no conflict of interest has been identified.

 

C.                                     Proxy Group

 

The Adviser shall establish a Proxy Group (the “Group” or “Proxy Group”) which shall assist in the review of the Agent’s recommendations when a proxy voting issue is referred to the Group through the Proxy Coordinator.  The members of the Proxy Group, which may include employees of the Advisers’ affiliates, are identified in Appendix 1, as may be amended from time at the Advisers’ discretion.

 

A minimum of four (4) members of the Proxy Group (or three (3) if one member of the quorum is either the Fund’s Chief Investment Risk Officer or Chief Financial Officer) shall constitute a quorum for purposes of taking action at any meeting of the Group.  The vote of a simple majority of the members present and voting shall determine any matter submitted to a vote.  Tie votes shall be broken by securing the vote of members not present at the meeting; provided, however, that the Proxy Coordinator shall ensure compliance with all applicable voting and conflict of interest procedures and shall use best efforts to secure votes from all or as many absent members as may reasonably be accomplished.  The Proxy Group may meet in person or by telephone.  The Proxy Group also may take action via electronic mail in lieu of a meeting, provided that each Group member has received a copy of any relevant electronic mail transmissions circulated by each other participating Group member prior to voting and provided that the Proxy Coordinator follows the directions of a majority of a quorum (as defined above) responding via electronic mail.  For all votes taken in person or by telephone or teleconference, the vote shall be taken outside the presence of any person other than the members of the Proxy Group and such other persons whose attendance may be deemed appropriate by the Proxy Group from time to time in furtherance of its duties or the day-to-day administration of the Funds.  In its discretion, the Proxy Group may provide the Proxy Coordinator with standing instructions to perform responsibilities assigned herein to the Proxy Group, or activities in support thereof, on its behalf, provided that such instructions do not contravene any requirements of these Adviser Procedures or a Fund’s Procedures and Guidelines.

 

10



 

A meeting of the Proxy Group will be held whenever (1) the Proxy Coordinator receives a recommendation from an Investment Professional to vote a Fund’s proxy contrary to the Procedures and Guidelines, or the recommendation of the Agent, where applicable, (2) the Agent has made no recommendation with respect to a vote on a proposal, or (3) a matter requires case-by-case consideration, including those in which the Agent’s recommendation is deemed to be conflicted as provided for under these Adviser Procedures, provided that, if the Proxy Group has previously provided the Proxy Coordinator with standing instructions to vote in accordance with the Agent’s recommendation and no issue of conflict must be considered, the Proxy Coordinator may implement the instructions without calling a meeting of the Proxy Group.

 

For each proposal referred to the Proxy Group, it will review (1) the relevant Procedures and Guidelines, (2) the recommendation of the Agent, if any, (3) the recommendation of the Investment Professional(s), if any, and (4) any other resources that any member of the Proxy Group deems appropriate to aid in a determination of a recommendation.

 

If the Proxy Group recommends that a Fund vote in accordance with the Procedures and Guidelines, or the recommendation of the Agent, where applicable, it shall instruct the Proxy Coordinator to so advise the Agent.

 

If the Proxy Group recommends that a Fund vote contrary to the Procedures and Guidelines, or the recommendation of the Agent, where applicable, or if the Agent’s recommendation on a matter requiring case-by-case consideration is deemed to be conflicted, it shall follow the procedures for such voting as established by a Fund’s Board.

 

The Proxy Coordinator shall use best efforts to convene the Proxy Group with respect to all matters requiring its consideration.  In the event quorum requirements cannot be timely met in connection with to a voting deadline, the Proxy Coordinator shall follow the procedures for such voting as established by a Fund’s Board.

 

D.            Investment Professionals

 

The Funds’ Advisers, sub-advisers and/or portfolio managers (each referred to herein as an “Investment Professional” and collectively, “Investment Professionals”) may submit, or be asked to submit, a recommendation to the Proxy Group regarding the voting of proxies related to the portfolio securities over which they have day-to-day portfolio management responsibility.  The Investment Professionals may accompany their recommendation with any other research materials that they deem appropriate or with a request that the vote be deemed “material” in the context of the portfolio(s) they manage, such that lending activity on behalf of such portfolio(s) with respect to the relevant security should be reviewed by the Proxy Group and considered for recall and/or restriction.  Input from the relevant sub-advisers and/or portfolio managers shall be given primary consideration in the Proxy Group’s determination of whether a given proxy vote

 

11



 

is to be deemed material and the associated security accordingly restricted from lending.  The determination that a vote is material in the context of a Fund’s portfolio shall not mean that such vote is considered material across all Funds voting that meeting.  In order to recall or restrict shares timely for material voting purposes, the Proxy Group shall use best efforts to consider, and when deemed appropriate, to act upon, such requests timely, and requests to review lending activity in connection with a potentially material vote may be initiated by any relevant Investment Professional and submitted for the Proxy Group’s consideration at any time.

 

III.          VOTING PROCEDURES

 

A.            In all cases, the Adviser shall follow the voting procedures as set forth in the Procedures and Guidelines of the Fund on whose behalf the Adviser is exercising delegated authority to vote.

 

B.            Routine Matters
 

The Agent shall be instructed to submit a vote in accordance with the Guidelines where such Guidelines provide a clear “For”, “Against,” “Withhold” or “Abstain” on a proposal.  However, the Agent shall be directed to refer any proxy proposal to the Proxy Coordinator for instructions as if it were a matter requiring case-by-case consideration under circumstances where the application of the Guidelines is unclear, it appears to involve unusual or controversial issues, or an Investment Professional recommends a vote contrary to the Guidelines.

 

C.            Matters Requiring Case-by-Case Consideration

 

The Agent shall be directed to refer proxy proposals accompanied by its written analysis and voting recommendation to the Proxy Coordinator where the Guidelines have noted “case-by-case” consideration.

 

Upon receipt of a referral from the Agent, the Proxy Coordinator may solicit additional research from the Agent, Investment Professional(s), as well as from any other source or service.

 

Except in cases in which the Proxy Group has previously provided the Proxy Coordinator with standing instructions to vote in accordance with the Agent’s recommendation, the Proxy Coordinator will forward the Agent’s analysis and recommendation and/or any research obtained from the Investment Professional(s), the Agent or any other source to the Proxy Group.  The Proxy Group may consult with the Agent and/or Investment Professional(s), as it deems necessary.

 

1.     Within-Guidelines Votes:  Votes in Accordance with a Fund’s Guidelines and/or, where applicable, Agent Recommendation

 

12



 

In the event the Proxy Group, and where applicable, any Investment Professional participating in the voting process, recommend a vote Within Guidelines, the Proxy Group will instruct the Agent, through the Proxy Coordinator, to vote in this manner.  Except as provided for herein, no Conflicts Report (as such term is defined herein) is required in connection with Within-Guidelines Votes.

 

2.     Non-Votes:  Votes in Which No Action is Taken

 

The Proxy Group may recommend that a Fund refrain from voting under circumstances including, but not limited to, the following:  (1) if the economic effect on shareholders’ interests or the value of the portfolio holding is indeterminable or insignificant, e.g., proxies in connection with fractional shares, securities no longer held in the portfolio of an ING Fund or proxies being considered on behalf of a Fund that is no longer in existence; or (2) if the cost of voting a proxy outweighs the benefits, e.g., certain international proxies, particularly in cases in which share blocking practices may impose trading restrictions on the relevant portfolio security.  In such instances, the Proxy Group may instruct the Agent, through the Proxy Coordinator, not to vote such proxy.  The Proxy Group may provide the Proxy Coordinator with standing instructions on parameters that would dictate a Non-Vote without the Proxy Group’s review of a specific proxy.  It is noted a Non-Vote determination would generally not be made in connection with voting rights received pursuant to class action participation; while a Fund may no longer hold the security, a continuing economic effect on shareholders’ interests is likely.

 

Reasonable efforts shall be made to secure and vote all other proxies for the Funds, but, particularly in markets in which shareholders’ rights are limited, Non-Votes may also occur in connection with a Fund’s related inability to timely access ballots or other proxy information in connection with its portfolio securities.

 

Non-Votes may also result in certain cases in which the Agent’s recommendation has been deemed to be conflicted, as provided for in the Funds’ Procedures.

 

3.     Out-of-Guidelines Votes:  Votes Contrary to Procedures and Guidelines, or Agent Recommendation, where applicable, Where No Recommendation is Provided by Agent, or Where Agent’s Recommendation is Conflicted

 

If the Proxy Group recommends that a Fund vote contrary to the Procedures and Guidelines, or the recommendation of the Agent, where applicable, if the Agent has made no recommendation on a matter requiring case-by-case consideration and the Procedures and Guidelines are silent, or the Agent’s recommendation on a matter requiring case-by-case consideration is deemed to be conflicted as

 

13



 

provided for under these Adviser Procedures, the Proxy Coordinator will then implement the procedures for handling such votes as adopted by the Fund’s Board.

 

4.     The Proxy Coordinator will maintain a record of all proxy questions that have been referred to a Fund’s Compliance Committee, all applicable recommendations, analysis, research and Conflicts Reports.

 

IV.          ASSESSMENT OF THE AGENT AND CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

 

In furtherance of the Advisers’ fiduciary duty to the Funds and their beneficial owners, the Advisers shall establish the following:

 

A.            Assessment of the Agent

 

The Advisers shall establish that the Agent (1) is independent from the Advisers, (2) has resources that indicate it can competently provide analysis of proxy issues and (3) can make recommendations in an impartial manner and in the best interests of the Funds and their beneficial owners.  The Advisers shall utilize, and the Agent shall comply with, such methods for establishing the foregoing as the Advisers may deem reasonably appropriate and shall do not less than annually as well as prior to engaging the services of any new proxy service.  The Agent shall also notify the Advisers in writing within fifteen (15) calendar days of any material change to information previously provided to an Adviser in connection with establishing the Agent’s independence, competence or impartiality.

 

Information provided in connection with assessment of the Agent shall be forwarded to a member of the mutual funds practice group of ING US Legal Services (“Counsel”) for review.  Counsel shall review such information and advise the Proxy Coordinator as to whether a material concern exists and if so, determine the most appropriate course of action to eliminate such concern.

 

B.            Conflicts of Interest

 

The Advisers shall establish and maintain procedures to identify and address conflicts that may arise from time to time concerning the Agent.  Upon the Advisers’ request, which shall be not less than annually, and within fifteen (15) calendar days of any material change to such information previously provided to an Adviser, the Agent shall provide the Advisers with such information as the Advisers deem reasonable and appropriate for use in determining material relationships of the Agent that may pose a conflict of interest with respect to the Agent’s proxy analysis or recommendations.  The Proxy Coordinator shall forward all such information to Counsel for review.  Counsel shall review such information and provide the Proxy Coordinator with a brief statement regarding whether or not a

 

14



 

material conflict of interest is present.  Matters as to which a material conflict of interest is deemed to be present shall be handled as provided in the Fund’s Procedures and Guidelines.

 

In connection with their participation in the voting process for portfolio securities, each member of the Proxy Group, and each Investment Professional participating in the voting process, must act solely in the best interests of the beneficial owners of the applicable Fund.  The members of the Proxy Group may not subordinate the interests of the Fund’s beneficial owners to unrelated objectives, including taking steps to reasonably insulate the voting process from any conflict of interest that may exist in connection with the Agent’s services or utilization thereof.

 

For all matters for which the Proxy Group recommends an Out-of-Guidelines Vote, or for which a recommendation contrary to that of the Agent or the Guidelines has been received from an Investment Professional and is to be utilized, the Proxy Coordinator will implement the procedures for handling such votes as adopted by the Fund’s Board, including completion of such Conflicts Reports as may be required under the Fund’s Procedures.  Completed Conflicts Reports shall be provided to the Proxy Coordinator within two (2) business days.  Such Conflicts Report should describe any known conflicts of either a business or personal nature, and set forth any contacts with respect to the referral item with non-investment personnel in its organization or with outside parties (except for routine communications from proxy solicitors).  The Conflicts Report should also include written confirmation that any recommendation from an Investment Professional provided in connection with an Out-of-Guidelines Vote or under circumstances where a conflict of interest exists was made solely on the investment merits and without regard to any other consideration.

 

The Proxy Coordinator shall forward all Conflicts Reports to Counsel for review.  Counsel shall review each report and provide the Proxy Coordinator with a brief statement regarding whether or not a material conflict of interest is present.  Matters as to which a material conflict of interest is deemed to be present shall be handled as provided in the Fund’s Procedures and Guidelines.

 

V.            REPORTING AND RECORD RETENTION

 

The Adviser shall maintain the records required by Rule 204-2(c)(2), as may be amended from time to time, including the following: (1) A copy of each proxy statement received regarding a Fund’s portfolio securities.  Such proxy statements received from issuers are available either in the SEC’s EDGAR database or are kept by the Agent and are available upon request. (2) A record of each vote cast on behalf of a Fund. (3) A copy of any document created by the Adviser that was material to making a decision how to vote a proxy, or that memorializes the basis for that decision. (4) A copy of written requests for Fund proxy voting information and any written

 

15



 

response thereto or to any oral request for information on how the Adviser voted proxies on behalf of a Fund.  All proxy voting materials and supporting documentation will be retained for a minimum of six (6) years.

 

16



 

APPENDIX 1

to the

Advisers’ Proxy Voting Procedures

 

Proxy Group for registered investment company clients of ING Investments, LLC, ING Investment Management Co. and Directed Services, LLC:

 

Name

 

Title or Affiliation

 

 

 

Stanley D. Vyner

 

Chief Investment Risk Officer and Executive Vice President, ING Investments, LLC

 

 

 

Todd Modic

 

Senior Vice President, ING Funds Services, LLC and ING Investments, LLC; and Chief Financial Officer of the ING Funds

 

 

 

Maria Anderson

 

Vice President of Fund Compliance, ING Funds Services, LLC

 

 

 

Karla J. Bos

 

Proxy Coordinator for the ING Funds and Assistant Vice President – Special Projects, ING Funds Services, LLC

 

 

 

Julius A. Drelick III, CFA

 

Vice President, Platform Product Management and Project Management, ING Funds Services, LLC

 

 

 

Harley Eisner

 

Vice President of Financial Analysis, ING Funds Services, LLC

 

 

 

Theresa K. Kelety, Esq.

 

Counsel, ING Americas US Legal Services

 

Effective as of January 1, 2008

 

17



 

EXHIBIT 3

to the

ING Funds
Proxy Voting Procedures

 

PROXY VOTING GUIDELINES OF THE ING FUNDS

 

I.             INTRODUCTION

 

The following is a statement of the Proxy Voting Guidelines (“Guidelines”) that have been adopted by the respective Boards of Directors or Trustees of each Fund.  Unless otherwise provided for herein, any defined term used herein shall have the meaning assigned to it in the Funds’ and Advisers’ Proxy Voting Procedures (the “Procedures”).

 

Proxies must be voted in the best interest of the Fund(s).  The Guidelines summarize the Funds’ positions on various issues of concern to investors, and give a general indication of how Fund portfolio securities will be voted on proposals dealing with particular issues.  The Guidelines are not exhaustive and do not include all potential voting issues.

 

The Advisers, in exercising their delegated authority, will abide by the Guidelines as outlined below with regard to the voting of proxies except as otherwise provided in the Procedures.  In voting proxies, the Advisers are guided by general fiduciary principles.  Each must act prudently, solely in the interest of the beneficial owners of the Funds it manages.  The Advisers will not subordinate the interest of beneficial owners to unrelated objectives.  Each Adviser will vote proxies in the manner that it believes will do the most to maximize shareholder value.

 

II.            GUIDELINES

 

The following Guidelines are grouped according to the types of proposals generally presented to shareholders of U.S. issuers:  Board of Directors, Proxy Contests, Auditors, Proxy Contest Defenses, Tender Offer Defenses, Miscellaneous, Capital Structure, Executive and Director Compensation, State of Incorporation, Mergers and Corporate Restructurings, Mutual Fund Proxies, and Social and Environmental Issues.  An additional section addresses proposals most frequently found in global proxies.

 

General Policies

 

These Guidelines apply to securities of publicly traded companies and to those of privately held companies if publicly available disclosure permits such application.  All matters for which such disclosure is not available shall be considered CASE-BY-CASE.

 



 

It shall generally be the policy of the Funds to take no action on a proxy for which no Fund holds a position or otherwise maintains an economic interest in the relevant security at the time the vote is to be cast.

 

In all cases receiving CASE-BY-CASE consideration, including cases not specifically provided for under these Guidelines, unless otherwise provided for under these Guidelines, it shall generally be the policy of the Funds to vote in accordance with the recommendation provided by the Funds’ Agent, Institutional Shareholder Services, Inc.

 

Unless otherwise provided for herein, it shall generally be the policy of the Funds to vote in accordance with the Agent’s recommendation in cases in which such recommendation aligns with the recommendation of the relevant issuer’s management or management has made no recommendation.  However, this policy shall not apply to CASE-BY-CASE proposals for which a contrary recommendation from the Investment Professional for the relevant Fund has been received and is to be utilized, provided that incorporation of any such recommendation shall be subject to the conflict of interest review process required under the Procedures.

 

Recommendations from the Investment Professionals, while not required under the Procedures, are likely to be considered with respect to proxies for private equity securities and/or proposals related to merger transactions/corporate restructurings, proxy contests, or unusual or controversial issues.  Such input shall be given primary consideration with respect to CASE-BY-CASE proposals being considered on behalf of the relevant Fund.

 

Except as otherwise provided for herein, it shall generally be the policy of the Funds not to support proposals that would impose a negative impact on existing rights of the Funds to the extent that any positive impact would not be deemed sufficient to outweigh removal or diminution of such rights.

 

The foregoing policies may be overridden in any case as provided for in the Procedures.  Similarly, the Procedures provide that proposals whose Guidelines prescribe a firm voting position may instead be considered on a CASE-BY-CASE basis in cases in which unusual or controversial circumstances so dictate.

 

Interpretation and application of these Guidelines is not intended to supersede any law, regulation, binding agreement or other legal requirement to which an issuer may be or become subject.  No proposal shall be supported whose implementation would contravene such requirements.

 

1.             The Board of Directors

 

Voting on Director Nominees in Uncontested Elections

 

Unless otherwise provided for herein, the Agent’s standards with respect to determining director independence shall apply.  These standards generally provide that, to be considered completely

 

19



 

independent, a director shall have no material connection to the company other than the board seat.

 

Agreement with the Agent’s independence standards shall not dictate that a Fund’s vote shall be cast according to the Agent’s corresponding recommendation.  Votes on director nominees not subject to specific policies described herein should be made on a CASE-BY-CASE basis.

 

Where applicable and except as otherwise provided for herein, it shall be the policy of the Funds to lodge disagreement with an issuer’s policies or practices by withholding support from a proposal for the relevant policy or practice rather than the director nominee(s) to which the Agent assigns a correlation.  Support shall be withheld from culpable nominees as appropriate, but if they are not standing for election (e.g., the board is classified), support shall generally not be withheld from others in their stead.

 

If application of the policies described herein would result in withholding votes from the majority of independent outside directors sitting on a board, or removal of such directors is likely to negatively impact majority board independence, primary consideration shall be given to retention of such independent outside director nominees unless the concerns identified are of such grave nature as to merit removal of the independent directors.

 

Where applicable and except as otherwise provided for herein, generally DO NOT WITHHOLD support (or DO NOT VOTE AGAINST, pursuant to the applicable election standard) in connection with issues raised by the Agent if the nominee did not serve on the board or relevant committee during the majority of the time period relevant to the concerns cited by the Agent.

 

WITHHOLD support from a nominee who, during both of the most recent two years, attended less than 75 percent of the board and committee meetings without a valid reason for the absences.  DO NOT WITHHOLD support in connection with attendance issues for nominees who have served on the board for less than the two most recent years.

 

WITHHOLD support from a nominee in connection with poison pill or anti-takeover considerations (e.g., furtherance of measures serving to disenfranchise shareholders or failure to remove restrictive pill features or ensure pill expiration or submission to shareholders for vote) in cases for which culpability for implementation or renewal of the pill in such form can be specifically attributed to the nominee.

 

Provided that a nominee served on the board during the relevant time period, WITHHOLD support from a nominee who has failed to implement a shareholder proposal that was approved by (1) a majority of the issuer’s shares outstanding (most recent annual meeting) or (2) a majority of the votes cast for two consecutive years.  However, in the case of shareholder proposals seeking shareholder ratification of a poison pill, generally DO NOT WITHHOLD support from a nominee in such cases if the company has already implemented a policy that should reasonably prevent abusive use of the pill.

 

20



 

If a nominee has not acted upon negative votes (WITHHOLD or AGAINST, as applicable based on the issuer’s election standard) representing a majority of the votes cast at the previous annual meeting, consider such nominee on a CASE-BY-CASE basis.  Generally, vote FOR nominees when (1) the issue relevant to the majority negative vote has been adequately addressed or cured or (2) the Funds’ Guidelines or voting record do not support the relevant issue.

 

WITHHOLD support from inside directors or affiliated outside directors who sit on the audit committee.

 

DO NOT WITHHOLD support from inside directors or affiliated outside directors who sit on the nominating or compensation committee, provided that such committee meets the applicable independence requirements of the relevant listing exchange.

 

DO NOT WITHHOLD support from inside directors or affiliated outside directors if the full board serves as the compensation or nominating committee OR has not created one or both committees, provided that the issuer is in compliance with all provisions of the listing exchange in connection with performance of relevant functions (e.g., performance of relevant functions by a majority of independent directors in lieu of the formation of a separate committee).

 

Compensation Practices:

 

It shall generally be the policy of the Funds that matters of compensation are best determined by an independent board and compensation committee.  Generally:

 

(1)       Where applicable and except as otherwise provided for herein, DO NOT WITHHOLD support from nominees who did not serve on the compensation committee, or board, as applicable based on the Agent’s analysis, during the majority of the time period relevant to the concerns cited by the Agent.

(2)       In cases in which the Agent has identified a “pay for performance” disconnect, or internal pay disparity, as such issues are defined by the Agent, DO NOT WITHHOLD support from director nominees.

(3)       If the Agent recommends withholding support from nominees in connection with executive compensation or perquisites related to retention or recruitment, including severance or termination arrangements, vote FOR such nominees if the issuer has provided adequate rationale and/or disclosure.

(4)       If the Agent has raised issues of options backdating, consider members of the compensation committee, or board, as applicable, as well as company executives nominated as directors, on a CASE-BY-CASE basis.

(5)       If the Agent has raised other considerations regarding poor compensation practices, consider nominees on a CASE-BY-CASE basis.

 

Accounting Practices:

 

(1)       Generally, vote FOR independent outside director nominees serving on the audit committee.

(2)       Where applicable and except as otherwise provided for herein, generally DO NOT WITHHOLD support from nominees serving on the audit committee who did not serve

 

21



 

on that committee during the majority of the time period relevant to the concerns cited by the Agent.

(3)       If the Agent has raised concerns regarding poor accounting practices, consider the company’s CEO and CFO, if nominated as directors, and nominees serving on the audit committee on a CASE-BY-CASE basis.

(4)       If total non-audit fees exceed the total of audit fees, audit-related fees and tax compliance and preparation fees, the provisions under Section 3., Auditor Ratification, shall apply.

 

Board Independence:

 

It shall generally be the policy of the Funds that a board should be majority independent and therefore to consider inside director or affiliated outside director nominees in cases in which the full board is not majority independent on a CASE-BY-CASE basis.  Generally:

 

(1)       WITHHOLD support from the fewest directors whose removal would achieve majority independence across the remaining board, except that support may be withheld from additional nominees whose relative level of independence cannot be differentiated.

(2)       WITHHOLD support from all non-independent nominees, including the founder, chairman or CEO, if the number required to achieve majority independence is equal to or greater than the number of non-independent nominees.

(3)       Except as provided above, vote FOR non-independent nominees in the role of CEO, and when appropriate, founder or chairman, and determine support for other non-independent nominees based on the qualifications and contributions of the nominee as well as the Funds’ voting precedent for assessing relative independence to management, e.g., insiders holding senior executive positions are deemed less independent than affiliated outsiders with a transactional or advisory relationship to the company, and affiliated outsiders with a material transactional or advisory relationship are deemed less independent than those with lesser relationships.

(4)       Non-voting directors (e.g., director emeritus or advisory director) shall be excluded from calculations with respect to majority board independence.

(5)       When conditions contributing to a lack of majority independence remain substantially similar to those in the previous year, it shall generally be the policy of the Funds to vote on nominees in a manner consistent with votes cast by the Fund(s) in the previous year.

 

Generally vote FOR nominees without regard to “over-boarding” issues raised by the Agent unless other concerns requiring CASE-BY-CASE consideration have been raised.

 

Generally, when the Agent recommends withholding support due to assessment that a nominee acted in bad faith or against shareholder interests in connection with a major transaction, such as a merger or acquisition, consider on a CASE-BY-CASE basis, factoring in the merits of the nominee’s performance and rationale and disclosure provided.

 

Performance Test for Directors

 

Consider nominees failing the Agent’s performance test, which includes market-based and operating performance measures, on a CASE-BY-CASE basis.  Input from the Investment

 

22



 

Professional(s) for a given Fund shall be given primary consideration with respect to such proposals.

 

Proposals Regarding Board Composition or Board Service

 

Generally, except as otherwise provided for herein, vote AGAINST shareholder proposals to impose new board structures or policies, including those requiring that the positions of chairman and CEO be held separately, except support proposals in connection with a binding agreement or other legal requirement to which an issuer has or reasonably may expect to become subject, and consider such proposals on a CASE-BY-CASE basis if the board is not majority independent or pervasive corporate governance concerns have been identified.  Generally, except as otherwise provided for herein, vote FOR management proposals to adopt or amend board structures or policies, except consider such proposals on a CASE-BY-CASE basis if the board is not majority independent, pervasive corporate governance concerns have been identified, or the proposal may result in a material reduction in shareholders’ rights.

 

Generally, vote AGAINST shareholder proposals asking that more than a simple majority of directors be independent.

 

Generally, vote AGAINST shareholder proposals asking that board compensation and/or nominating committees be composed exclusively of independent directors.

 

Generally, vote AGAINST shareholder proposals to limit the number of public company boards on which a director may serve.

 

Generally, vote AGAINST shareholder proposals that seek to redefine director independence or directors’ specific roles (e.g., responsibilities of the lead director).

 

Generally, vote AGAINST shareholder proposals requesting creation of additional board committees or offices, except as otherwise provided for herein.

 

Generally, vote FOR shareholder proposals that seek creation of an audit, compensation or nominating committee of the board, unless the committee in question is already in existence or the issuer has availed itself of an applicable exemption of the listing exchange (e.g., performance of relevant functions by a majority of independent directors in lieu of the formation of a separate committee).

 

Generally, vote AGAINST shareholder proposals to limit the tenure of outside directors.

 

Generally, vote AGAINST shareholder proposals to impose a mandatory retirement age for outside directors unless the proposal seeks to relax existing standards, but generally DO NOT VOTE AGAINST management proposals seeking to establish a retirement age for directors.

 

Stock Ownership Requirements

 

Generally, vote AGAINST shareholder proposals requiring directors to own a minimum amount of company stock in order to qualify as a director or to remain on the board.

 

Director and Officer Indemnification and Liability Protection

 

Proposals on director and officer indemnification and liability protection should be evaluated on a CASE-BY-CASE basis, using Delaware law as the standard.  Vote AGAINST proposals to limit or eliminate entirely directors’ and officers’ liability for monetary damages for violating the duty of care.  Vote AGAINST indemnification proposals that would expand coverage beyond just legal expenses to acts, such as negligence, that are more serious violations of fiduciary

 

23



 

obligation than mere carelessness.  Vote FOR only those proposals providing such expanded coverage in cases when a director’s or officer’s legal defense was unsuccessful if:

 

(1)       The director was found to have acted in good faith and in a manner that he reasonably believed was in the best interests of the company, and

(2)       Only if the director’s legal expenses would be covered.

 

2.             Proxy Contests

 

These proposals should generally be analyzed on a CASE-BY-CASE basis.  Input from the Investment Professional(s) for a given Fund shall be given primary consideration with respect to proposals in connection with proxy contests being considered on behalf of that Fund.

 

Voting for Director Nominees in Contested Elections

 

Votes in a contested election of directors must be evaluated on a CASE-BY-CASE basis.

 

Reimburse Proxy Solicitation Expenses

 

Voting to reimburse proxy solicitation expenses should be analyzed on a CASE-BY-CASE basis.

 

3.             Auditors

 

Ratifying Auditors

 

Generally, except in cases of poor accounting practices or high non-audit fees, vote FOR management proposals to ratify auditors.  Consider management proposals to ratify auditors on a CASE-BY-CASE basis if the Agent cites poor accounting practices.  If fees for non-audit services exceed 50 percent of total auditor fees as described below, consider on a CASE-BY-CASE basis, voting AGAINST management proposals to ratify auditors only if concerns exist that remuneration for the non-audit work is so lucrative as to taint the auditor’s independence.  For purposes of this review, fees deemed to be reasonable, generally non-recurring, exceptions to the non-audit fee category (e.g., those related to an IPO) shall be excluded.  If independence concerns exist or an issuer has a history of questionable accounting practices, also vote FOR shareholder proposals asking the issuer to present its auditor annually for ratification, but in other cases generally vote AGAINST.

 

Auditor Independence

 

Generally, consider shareholder proposals asking companies to prohibit their auditors from engaging in non-audit services (or capping the level of non-audit services) on a CASE-BY-CASE basis.

 

Audit Firm Rotation:

 

Generally, vote AGAINST shareholder proposals asking for mandatory audit firm rotation.

 

24



 

4.             Proxy Contest Defenses

 

Board Structure: Staggered vs. Annual Elections

 

Generally, vote AGAINST proposals to classify the board or otherwise restrict shareholders’ ability to vote upon directors.

 

Generally, vote FOR proposals to repeal classified boards and to elect all directors annually.

 

Shareholder Ability to Remove Directors

 

Generally, vote AGAINST proposals that provide that directors may be removed only for cause.

 

Generally, vote FOR proposals to restore shareholder ability to remove directors with or without cause.

 

Generally, vote AGAINST proposals that provide that only continuing directors may elect replacements to fill board vacancies.

 

Generally, vote FOR proposals that permit shareholders to elect directors to fill board vacancies.

 

Cumulative Voting

 

If the company maintains a classified board of directors, generally, vote AGAINST management proposals to eliminate cumulative voting, except that such proposals may be supported irrespective of classification in furtherance of an issuer’s plan to adopt a majority voting standard.

 

In cases in which the company maintains a classified board of directors, generally vote FOR shareholder proposals to restore or permit cumulative voting.

 

Time-Phased Voting

 

Generally, vote AGAINST proposals to implement, and FOR proposals to eliminate, time-phased or other forms of voting that do not promote a one share, one vote standard.

 

Shareholder Ability to Call Special Meetings

 

Generally, vote AGAINST proposals to restrict or prohibit shareholder ability to call special meetings.

 

Generally, vote FOR proposals that remove restrictions on the right of shareholders to act independently of management.

 

Shareholder Ability to Act by Written Consent

 

Generally, vote AGAINST proposals to restrict or prohibit shareholder ability to take action by written consent.

 

Generally, vote FOR proposals to allow or make easier shareholder action by written consent.

 

Shareholder Ability to Alter the Size of the Board

 

Generally, vote FOR proposals that seek to fix the size of the board or designate a range for its size.

 

Generally, vote AGAINST proposals that give management the ability to alter the size of the board outside of a specified range without shareholder approval.

 

25



 

5.             Tender Offer Defenses

 

Poison Pills

 

Generally, vote FOR shareholder proposals that ask a company to submit its poison pill for shareholder ratification, or to redeem its pill in lieu thereof, unless (1) shareholders have approved adoption of the plan, (2) a policy has already been implemented by the company that should reasonably prevent abusive use of the pill, or (3) the board had determined that it was in the best interest of shareholders to adopt a pill without delay, provided that such plan would be put to shareholder vote within twelve months of adoption or expire, and if not approved by a majority of the votes cast, would immediately terminate.

 

Review on a CASE-BY-CASE basis shareholder proposals to redeem a company’s poison pill.

 

Review on a CASE-BY-CASE basis management proposals to approve or ratify a poison pill or any plan that can reasonably be construed as an anti-takeover measure, with voting decisions generally based on the Agent’s approach to evaluating such proposals, considering factors such as rationale, trigger level and sunset provisions.  Votes will generally be cast in a manner that seeks to preserve shareholder value and the right to consider a valid offer, voting AGAINST management proposals in connection with poison pills or anti-takeover activities that do not meet the Agent’s standards.

 

Fair Price Provisions

 

Vote proposals to adopt fair price provisions on a CASE-BY-CASE basis.

 

Generally, vote AGAINST fair price provisions with shareholder vote requirements greater than a majority of disinterested shares.

 

Greenmail

 

Generally, vote FOR proposals to adopt antigreenmail charter or bylaw amendments or otherwise restrict a company’s ability to make greenmail payments.

 

Review on a CASE-BY-CASE basis antigreenmail proposals when they are bundled with other charter or bylaw amendments.

 

Pale Greenmail

 

Review on a CASE-BY-CASE basis restructuring plans that involve the payment of pale greenmail.

 

Unequal Voting Rights

 

Generally, vote AGAINST dual-class exchange offers.

 

Generally, vote AGAINST dual-class recapitalizations.

 

Supermajority Shareholder Vote Requirement to Amend the Charter or Bylaws

 

Generally, vote AGAINST management proposals to require a supermajority shareholder vote to approve charter and bylaw amendments or other key proposals.

 

Generally, vote FOR shareholder proposals to lower supermajority shareholder vote requirements for charter and bylaw amendments, unless the proposal also asks the issuer to

 

26



 

mount a solicitation campaign or similar form of comprehensive commitment to obtain passage of the proposal.

 

Supermajority Shareholder Vote Requirement to Approve Mergers

 

Generally, vote AGAINST management proposals to require a supermajority shareholder vote to approve mergers and other significant business combinations.

 

Generally, vote FOR shareholder proposals to lower supermajority shareholder vote requirements for mergers and other significant business combinations.

 

White Squire Placements

 

Generally, vote FOR shareholder proposals to require approval of blank check preferred stock issues for other than general corporate purposes.

 

6.             Miscellaneous

 

Amendments to Corporate Documents

 

Except to align with legislative or regulatory changes or when support is recommended by the Agent or Investment Professional (including, for example, as a condition to a major transaction such as a merger), generally, vote AGAINST proposals seeking to remove shareholder approval requirements or otherwise remove or diminish shareholder rights, e.g., by (1) adding restrictive provisions, (2) removing provisions or moving them to portions of the charter not requiring shareholder approval, or (3) in corporate structures such as holding companies, removing provisions in an active subsidiary’s charter that provide voting rights to parent company shareholders.  This policy would also generally apply to proposals seeking approval of corporate agreements or amendments to such agreements that the Agent recommends AGAINST because a similar reduction in shareholder rights is requested.

 

Generally, vote AGAINST proposals for charter amendments that may support board entrenchment or may be used as an anti-takeover device, particularly if the proposal is bundled or the board is classified.

 

Generally, vote FOR proposals seeking charter or bylaw amendments to remove anti-takeover provisions.

 

Consider proposals seeking charter or bylaw amendments not addressed under these Guidelines on a CASE-BY-CASE basis.

 

Confidential Voting

 

Generally, vote FOR shareholder proposals that request companies to adopt confidential voting, use independent tabulators, and use independent inspectors of election as long as the proposals include clauses for proxy contests as follows:

 

·      In the case of a contested election, management should be permitted to request that the dissident group honor its confidential voting policy.

 

·      If the dissidents agree, the policy remains in place.

 

·      If the dissidents do not agree, the confidential voting policy is waived.

 

Generally, vote FOR management proposals to adopt confidential voting.

 

27



 

Proxy Access

 

Consider on a CASE-BY-CASE basis shareholder proposals seeking access to management’s proxy material in order to nominate their own candidates to the board.

 

Majority Voting Standard

 

Except as otherwise provided for herein, it shall generally be the policy of the Funds to extend discretion to issuers to determine when it may be appropriate to adopt a majority voting standard.  Generally, vote FOR management proposals, irrespective of whether the proposal contains a plurality carve-out for contested elections, but AGAINST shareholder proposals unless also supported by management, seeking election of directors by the affirmative vote of the majority of votes cast in connection with a meeting of shareholders, including amendments to corporate documents or other actions in furtherance of such standard, and provided such standard when supported does not conflict with state law in which the company is incorporated.  For issuers with a history of board malfeasance or pervasive corporate governance concerns, consider such proposals on a CASE-BY-CASE basis.

 

Bundled Proposals

 

Except as otherwise provided for herein, review on a CASE-BY-CASE basis bundled or “conditioned” proxy proposals, generally voting AGAINST bundled proposals containing one or more items not supported under these Guidelines if the Agent or an Investment Professional deems the negative impact, on balance, to outweigh any positive impact.

 

Shareholder Advisory Committees

 

Review on a CASE-BY-CASE basis proposals to establish a shareholder advisory committee.

 

Reimburse Shareholder for Expenses Incurred

 

Voting to reimburse expenses incurred in connection with shareholder proposals should be analyzed on a CASE-BY-CASE basis, with voting decisions determined based on the Agent’s criteria, considering whether the related proposal received the requisite support for approval and was adopted for the benefit of the company and its shareholders.

 

Other Business

 

In connection with proxies of U.S. issuers, generally vote FOR management proposals for Other Business, except in connection with a proxy contest in which a Fund is not voting in support of management.

 

Quorum Requirements

 

Review on a CASE-BY-CASE basis proposals to lower quorum requirements for shareholder meetings below a majority of the shares outstanding.

 

28



 

Advance Notice for Shareholder Proposals

 

Generally, vote FOR management proposals related to advance notice period requirements, provided that the period requested is in accordance with applicable law and no material governance concerns have been identified in connection with the issuer.

 

7.             Capital Structure

 

Analyze on a CASE-BY-CASE basis.

 

Common Stock Authorization

 

Review proposals to increase the number of shares of common stock authorized for issue on a CASE-BY-CASE basis.  Except where otherwise indicated, the Agent’s proprietary approach, utilizing quantitative criteria (e.g., dilution, peer group comparison, company performance and history) to determine appropriate thresholds and, for requests marginally above such allowable threshold, a qualitative review (e.g., rationale and prudent historical usage), will generally be utilized in evaluating such proposals.

 

·      Generally vote FOR proposals to authorize capital increases within the Agent’s allowable thresholds or those in excess but meeting Agent’s qualitative standards, but consider on a CASE-BY-CASE basis those requests failing the Agent’s review for proposals in connection with which a contrary recommendation from the Investment Professional(s) has been received and is to be utilized (e.g., in support of a merger or acquisition proposal).

 

·      Generally vote FOR proposals to authorize capital increases within the Agent’s allowable thresholds or those in excess but meeting Agent’s qualitative standards, unless the company states that the stock may be used as a takeover defense.  In those cases, consider on a CASE-BY-CASE basis if a contrary recommendation from the Investment Professional(s) has been received and is to be utilized.

 

·      Generally vote FOR proposals to authorize capital increases exceeding the Agent’s thresholds when a company’s shares are in danger of being delisted or if a company’s ability to continue to operate as a going concern is uncertain.

 

·      Generally, vote AGAINST proposals to increase the number of authorized shares of a class of stock if the issuance which the increase is intended to service is not supported under these Guidelines.

 

Dual Class Capital Structures

 

Generally, vote AGAINST proposals to increase the number of authorized shares of the class of stock that has superior voting rights in companies that have dual class capital structures, but consider CASE-BY-CASE if (1) bundled with favorable proposal(s), (2) approval of such proposal(s) is a condition of such favorable proposal(s), or (3) part of a recapitalization for which support is recommended by the Agent or an Investment Professional.

 

Generally, vote AGAINST management proposals to create or perpetuate dual class capital structures with unequal voting rights, and vote FOR shareholder proposals to eliminate them, in cases in which the relevant Fund owns the class with inferior voting rights, but generally vote FOR management proposals and AGAINST shareholder proposals in cases in which the relevant

 

29



 

Fund owns the class with superior voting rights.  Consider CASE-BY-CASE if bundled with favorable proposal(s), (2) approval of such proposal(s) is a condition of such favorable proposal(s), or (3) part of a recapitalization for which support is recommended by the Agent or an Investment Professional.

 

Consider management proposals to eliminate dual class capital structures CASE-BY-CASE, generally voting with the Agent’s recommendation unless a contrary recommendation has been received from the Investment Professional for the relevant Fund and is to be utilized.

 

Stock Distributions: Splits and Dividends

 

Generally, vote FOR management proposals to increase common share authorization for a stock split, provided that the increase in authorized shares falls within the Agent’s allowable thresholds, but consider on a CASE-BY-CASE basis those proposals exceeding the Agent’s threshold for proposals in connection with which a contrary recommendation from the Investment Professional(s) has been received and is to be utilized.

 

Reverse Stock Splits

 

Consider on a CASE-BY-CASE basis management proposals to implement a reverse stock split.  In the event the split constitutes a capital increase effectively exceeding the Agent’s allowable threshold because the request does not proportionately reduce the number of shares authorized, vote FOR the split if the Agent otherwise supports management’s rationale.

 

Preferred Stock

 

Generally, vote AGAINST proposals authorizing the issuance of preferred stock or creation of new classes of preferred stock with unspecified voting, conversion, dividend distribution, and other rights (“blank check” preferred stock), but vote FOR if the Agent or an Investment Professional so recommends because the issuance is required to effect a merger or acquisition proposal.

 

Generally, vote FOR proposals to issue or create blank check preferred stock in cases when the company expressly states that the stock will not be used as a takeover defense.  Generally vote AGAINST in cases where the company expressly states that, or fails to disclose whether, the stock may be used as a takeover defense, but vote FOR if the Agent or an Investment Professional so recommends because the issuance is required to effect a merger or acquisition proposal.

 

Generally, vote FOR proposals to authorize or issue preferred stock in cases where the company specifies the voting, dividend, conversion, and other rights of such stock and the terms of the preferred stock appear reasonable.

 

Vote CASE-BY-CASE on proposals to increase the number of blank check preferred shares after analyzing the number of preferred shares available for issue given a company’s industry and performance in terms of shareholder returns.

 

Shareholder Proposals Regarding Blank Check Preferred Stock

 

Generally, vote FOR shareholder proposals to have blank check preferred stock placements, other than those shares issued for the purpose of raising capital or making acquisitions in the normal course of business, submitted for shareholder ratification.

 

30



 

Adjustments to Par Value of Common Stock

 

Generally, vote FOR management proposals to reduce the par value of common stock.

 

Preemptive Rights

 

Review on a CASE-BY-CASE basis shareholder proposals that seek preemptive rights or management proposals that seek to eliminate them.  In evaluating proposals on preemptive rights, consider the size of a company and the characteristics of its shareholder base.

 

Debt Restructurings

 

Review on a CASE-BY-CASE basis proposals to increase common and/or preferred shares and to issue shares as part of a debt restructuring plan.

 

Share Repurchase Programs

 

Generally, vote FOR management proposals to institute open-market share repurchase plans in which all shareholders may participate on equal terms, but vote AGAINST plans with terms favoring selected, non-Fund parties.

 

Generally, vote FOR management proposals to cancel repurchased shares.

 

Generally, vote AGAINST proposals for share repurchase methods lacking adequate risk mitigation as assessed by the Agent.

 

Tracking Stock

 

Votes on the creation of tracking stock are determined on a CASE-BY-CASE basis.

 

8.                                      Executive and Director Compensation

 

Except as otherwise provided for herein, votes with respect to compensation and employee benefit plans should be determined on a CASE-BY-CASE basis, with voting decisions generally based on the Agent’s approach to evaluating such plans, which includes determination of costs and comparison to an allowable cap.

 

·                  Generally, vote in accordance with the Agent’s recommendations FOR equity-based plans with costs within such cap and AGAINST those with costs in excess of it, except that plans above the cap may be supported if so recommended by the Agent or Investment Professional as a condition to a major transaction such as a merger.

 

·                  Generally, vote AGAINST plans if the Agent suggests cost or dilution assessment may not be possible due to the method of disclosing shares allocated to the plan(s), except that such concerns arising in connection with evergreen provisions shall be considered CASE-BY-CASE.

 

·                  Generally, vote FOR plans with costs within the cap if the primary considerations raised by the Agent pertain to matters that would not result in a negative vote under these Guidelines on the relevant board or committee member(s), or equity compensation burn rate or pay for performance as defined by Agent.

 

·                  Generally, vote AGAINST plans administered by potential grant recipients.

 

31



 

·                  Generally, vote AGAINST proposals to eliminate existing shareholder approval requirements for plan changes assessed as material by the Agent, unless the company has provided a reasonable rationale and/or adequate disclosure regarding the requested changes.

 

·                  Consider plans CASE-BY-CASE if the Agent raises other considerations not otherwise provided for herein.

 

Restricted Stock or Stock Option Plans

 

Consider proposals for restricted stock or stock option plans, or the issuance of shares in connection with such plans, on a CASE-BY-CASE basis, considering factors such as level of disclosure and adequacy of vesting or performance requirements.  Plans that do not meet the Agent’s criteria in this regard may be supported, but vote AGAINST if no disclosure is provided regarding either vesting or performance requirements.

 

Management Proposals Seeking Approval to Reprice Options

 

Review on a CASE-BY-CASE basis management proposals seeking approval to reprice, replace or exchange options, considering factors such as rationale, historic trading patterns, value-for-value exchange, vesting periods and replacement option terms.  Generally, vote FOR proposals that meet the Agent’s criteria for acceptable repricing, replacement or exchange transactions, except that considerations raised by the Agent regarding burn rate or executive participation shall not be grounds for withholding support.

 

Vote AGAINST compensation plans that (1) permit or may permit (e.g., history of repricing and no express prohibition against future repricing) repricing of stock options, or any form or alternative to repricing, without shareholder approval, (2) include provisions that permit repricing, replacement or exchange transactions that do not meet the Agent’s criteria (except regarding burn rate or executive participation as noted above), or (3) give the board sole discretion to approve option repricing, replacement or exchange programs.

 

Director Compensation

 

Votes on stock-based plans for directors are made on a CASE-BY-CASE basis, with voting decisions generally based on the Agent’s quantitative approach described above as well as a review of qualitative features of the plan in cases in which costs exceed the Agent’s threshold.  DO NOT VOTE AGAINST plans for which burn rate is the sole consideration raised by the Agent.

 

Employee Stock Purchase Plans

 

Votes on employee stock purchase plans, and capital issuances in support of such plans, should be made on a CASE-BY-CASE basis, with voting decisions generally based on the Agent’s approach to evaluating such plans, except that negative recommendations by the Agent due to evergreen provisions will be reviewed CASE-BY-CASE.

 

OBRA-Related Compensation Proposals

 

Votes on plans intended to qualify for favorable tax treatment under the provisions of Section 162(m) of OBRA should be evaluated irrespective of the Agent’s assessment of board

 

32



 

independence, provided that the board meets the independence requirements of the relevant listing exchange.

 

Amendments that Place a Cap on Annual Grants or Amend Administrative Features

 

Generally, vote FOR plans that simply amend shareholder-approved plans to include administrative features or place a cap on the annual grants any one participant may receive to comply with the provisions of Section 162(m) of OBRA.

 

Amendments to Add Performance-Based Goals

 

Generally, vote FOR amendments to add performance goals to existing compensation plans to comply with the provisions of Section 162(m) of OBRA.

 

Amendments to Increase Shares and Retain Tax Deductions Under OBRA

 

Votes on amendments to existing plans to increase shares reserved and to qualify the plan for favorable tax treatment under the provisions of Section 162(m) should be evaluated on a CASE-BY-CASE basis.

 

Approval of Cash or Cash-and-Stock Bonus Plans

 

Generally, vote FOR cash or cash-and-stock bonus plans to exempt the compensation from taxes under the provisions of Section 162(m) of OBRA, with primary consideration given to management’s assessment that such plan meets the requirements for exemption of performance-based compensation.

 

Shareholder Proposals Regarding Executive and Director Pay

 

Regarding the remuneration of individuals other than senior executives and directors, generally, vote AGAINST shareholder proposals that seek to expand or restrict disclosure or require shareholder approval beyond regulatory requirements and market practice.  Vote AGAINST shareholder proposals that seek disclosure of executive or director compensation if providing it would be out of step with market practice and potentially disruptive to the business.

 

Unless evidence exists of abuse in historical compensation practices, and except as otherwise provided for herein, generally vote AGAINST shareholder proposals that seek to impose new compensation structures or policies, such as “claw back” recoupments or advisory votes.

 

Severance and Termination Payments

 

Generally, vote FOR shareholder proposals to have parachute arrangements submitted for shareholder ratification (with “parachutes” defined as compensation arrangements related to termination that specify change-in-control events) and provided that the proposal does not include unduly restrictive or arbitrary provisions such as advance approval requirements.

 

Generally vote AGAINST shareholder proposals to submit executive severance agreements for shareholder ratification, unless such proposals specify change-in-control events, Supplemental Executive Retirement Plans or deferred executive compensation plans, or ratification is required by the listing exchange.

 

Review on a CASE-BY-CASE basis all proposals to approve, ratify or cancel executive severance or termination arrangements, including those related to executive recruitment or

 

33



 

retention, generally voting FOR such compensation arrangements if the issuer has provided adequate rationale and/or disclosure or support is recommended by the Agent or Investment Professional (e.g., as a condition to a major transaction such as a merger).

 

Employee Stock Ownership Plans (ESOPs)

 

Generally, vote FOR proposals that request shareholder approval in order to implement an ESOP or to increase authorized shares for existing ESOPs, except in cases when the number of shares allocated to the ESOP is “excessive” (i.e., generally greater than five percent of outstanding shares).

 

401(k) Employee Benefit Plans

 

Generally, vote FOR proposals to implement a 401(k) savings plan for employees.

 

Holding Periods

 

Generally, vote AGAINST proposals requiring mandatory periods for officers and directors to hold company stock.

 

Advisory Votes on Executive Compensation

 

Generally, management proposals seeking ratification of the company’s compensation program will be voted FOR unless the program includes practices or features not supported under these Guidelines and the proposal receives a negative recommendation from the Agent.  Unless otherwise provided for herein, reports not receiving the Agent’s support due to concerns regarding severance/termination payments, incentive structures or vesting or performance criteria not otherwise supported by these Guidelines will be considered on a CASE-BY-CASE basis, generally voted FOR if the company has provided a reasonable rationale and/or adequate disclosure regarding the matter(s) under consideration.

 

9.                                      State of Incorporation

 

Voting on State Takeover Statutes

 

Review on a CASE-BY-CASE basis proposals to opt in or out of state takeover statutes (including control share acquisition statutes, control share cash-out statutes, freezeout provisions, fair price provisions, stakeholder laws, poison pill endorsements, severance pay and labor contract provisions, antigreenmail provisions, and disgorgement provisions).

 

Voting on Reincorporation Proposals

 

Proposals to change a company’s state of incorporation should be examined on a CASE-BY-CASE basis, generally supporting management proposals not assessed by the Agent as a potential takeover defense, but if so assessed, weighing management’s rationale for the change.  Generally, vote FOR management reincorporation proposals upon which another key proposal, such as a merger transaction, is contingent if the other key proposal is also supported.  Generally, vote AGAINST shareholder reincorporation proposals not also supported by the company.

 

34



 

10.                               Mergers and Corporate Restructurings

 

Input from the Investment Professional(s) for a given Fund shall be given primary consideration with respect to proposals regarding business combinations, particularly those between otherwise unaffiliated parties, or other corporate restructurings being considered on behalf of that Fund.

 

Generally, vote FOR a proposal not typically supported under these Guidelines if a key proposal, such as a merger transaction, is contingent upon its support and a vote FOR is accordingly recommended by the Agent or an Investment Professional.

 

Mergers and Acquisitions

 

Votes on mergers and acquisitions should be considered on a CASE-BY-CASE basis.

 

Corporate Restructuring

 

Votes on corporate restructuring proposals, including demergers, minority squeezeouts, leveraged buyouts, spinoffs, liquidations, dispositions, divestitures and asset sales, should be considered on a CASE-BY-CASE basis, with voting decisions generally based on the Agent’s approach to evaluating such proposals.

 

Adjournment

 

Generally, vote FOR proposals to adjourn a meeting to provide additional time for vote solicitation when the primary proposal is also voted FOR.

 

Appraisal Rights

 

Generally, vote FOR proposals to restore, or provide shareholders with, rights of appraisal.

 

Changing Corporate Name

 

Generally, vote FOR changing the corporate name.

 

11.                               Mutual Fund Proxies

 

Election of Directors

 

Vote the election of directors on a CASE-BY-CASE basis.

 

Converting Closed-end Fund to Open-end Fund

 

Vote conversion proposals on a CASE-BY-CASE basis.

 

Proxy Contests

 

Vote proxy contests on a CASE-BY-CASE basis.

 

Investment Advisory Agreements

 

Vote the investment advisory agreements on a CASE-BY-CASE basis.

 

Approving New Classes or Series of Shares

 

Generally, vote FOR the establishment of new classes or series of shares.

 

35



 

Preferred Stock Proposals

 

Vote the authorization for or increase in preferred shares on a CASE-BY-CASE basis.

 

1940 Act Policies

 

Vote these proposals on a CASE-BY-CASE basis.

 

Changing a Fundamental Restriction to a Nonfundamental Restriction

 

Vote these proposals on a CASE-BY-CASE basis.

 

Change Fundamental Investment Objective to Nonfundamental

 

Generally, consider proposals to change a fund’s fundamental investment objective to nonfundamental on a CASE-BY-CASE basis.

 

Name Rule Proposals

 

Vote these proposals on a CASE-BY-CASE basis.

 

Disposition of Assets/Termination/Liquidation

 

Vote these proposals on a CASE-BY-CASE basis.

 

Changes to the Charter Document

 

Vote changes to the charter document on a CASE-BY-CASE basis.

 

Changing the Domicile of a Fund

 

Vote reincorporations on a CASE-BY-CASE basis.

 

Change in Fund’s Subclassification

 

Vote these proposals on a CASE-BY-CASE basis.

 

Authorizing the Board to Hire and Terminate Subadvisors Without Shareholder Approval

 

Generally, vote FOR these proposals.

 

Distribution Agreements

 

Vote these proposals on a CASE-BY-CASE basis.

 

Master-Feeder Structure

 

Generally, vote FOR the establishment of a master-feeder structure.

 

Mergers

 

Vote merger proposals on a CASE-BY-CASE basis.

 

Establish Director Ownership Requirement

 

Generally, vote AGAINST shareholder proposals for the establishment of a director ownership requirement.

 

36



 

Reimburse Shareholder for Expenses Incurred

 

Voting to reimburse proxy solicitation expenses should be analyzed on a CASE-BY-CASE basis.

 

Terminate the Investment Advisor

 

Vote to terminate the investment advisor on a CASE-BY-CASE basis.

 

12.                               Social and Environmental Issues

 

These issues cover a wide range of topics.  In general, unless otherwise specified herein, vote CASE-BY-CASE.  While a wide variety of factors may go into each analysis, the overall principle guiding all vote recommendations focuses on how or whether the proposal will enhance the economic value of the company.  Because a company’s board is likely to have access to relevant, non-public information regarding a company’s business, such proposals will generally be voted in a manner intended to give the board (rather than shareholders) latitude to set corporate policy and oversee management.

 

Absent concurring support from the issuer, compelling evidence of abuse, significant public controversy or litigation, the issuer’s significant history of relevant violations; or activities not in step with market practice or regulatory requirements, or unless provided for otherwise herein, generally vote AGAINST shareholder proposals seeking to dictate corporate conduct, apply existing law, duplicate policies already substantially in place and/or addressed by the issuer, or release information that would not help a shareholder evaluate an investment in the corporation as an economic matter.  Such proposals would generally include those seeking preparation of reports and/or implementation or additional disclosure of corporate policies related to issues such as consumer and public safety, environment and energy, labor standards and human rights, military business and political concerns, workplace diversity and non-discrimination, sustainability, social issues, vendor activities, economic risk or matters of science and engineering.

 

13.                               Global Proxies

 

The foregoing Guidelines provided in connection with proxies of U.S. issuers shall also be applied to global proxies where applicable and not provided for otherwise herein.  The following provide for differing regulatory and legal requirements, market practices and political and economic systems existing in various global markets.

 

Unless otherwise provided for herein, it shall generally be the policy of the Funds to vote AGAINST global proxy proposals in cases in which the Agent recommends voting AGAINST such proposal because relevant disclosure by the issuer, or the time provided for consideration of such disclosure, is inadequate.  For purposes of these global Guidelines, “AGAINST” shall mean withholding of support for a proposal, resulting in submission of a vote of AGAINST or ABSTAIN, as appropriate for the given market and level of concern raised by the Agent regarding the issue or lack of disclosure or time provided.

 

37



 

In connection with practices described herein that are associated with a firm AGAINST vote, it shall generally be the policy of the Funds to consider them on a CASE-BY-CASE basis if the Agent recommends their support (1) as the issuer or market transitions to better practices (e.g., having committed to new regulations or governance codes) or (2) as the more favorable choice in cases in which shareholders must choose between alternate proposals.

 

Routine Management Proposals

 

Generally, vote FOR the following and other similar routine management proposals:

 

·                  the opening of the shareholder meeting

 

·                  that the meeting has been convened under local regulatory requirements

 

·                  the presence of quorum

 

·                  the agenda for the shareholder meeting

 

·                  the election of the chair of the meeting

 

·                  the appointment of shareholders to co-sign the minutes of the meeting

 

·                  regulatory filings (e.g., to effect approved share issuances)

 

·                  the designation of inspector or shareholder representative(s) of minutes of meeting

 

·                  the designation of two shareholders to approve and sign minutes of meeting

 

·                  the allowance of questions

 

·                  the publication of minutes

 

·                  the closing of the shareholder meeting

 

Discharge of Management/Supervisory Board Members

 

Generally, vote FOR management proposals seeking the discharge of management and supervisory board members, unless the Agent recommends AGAINST due to concern about the past actions of the company’s auditors or directors or legal action is being taken against the board by other shareholders, including when the proposal is bundled.

 

Director Elections

 

Unless otherwise provided for herein, the Agent’s standards with respect to determining director independence shall apply.  These standards generally provide that, to be considered completely independent, a director shall have no material connection to the company other than the board seat.

 

Agreement with the Agent’s independence standards shall not dictate that a Fund’s vote shall be cast according to the Agent’s corresponding recommendation.  Further, unless otherwise provided for herein, the application of Guidelines in connection with such standards shall apply only in cases in which the nominee’s level of independence can be ascertained based on available disclosure.  These policies generally apply to director nominees in uncontested elections; votes in contested elections, and votes on director nominees not subject to policies described herein, should be made on a CASE-BY-CASE basis, with primary consideration in contested elections given to input from the Investment Professional(s) for a given Fund.

 

38



 

For issuers domiciled in Canada, Finland, France, Ireland, the Netherlands, Sweden or tax haven markets, generally vote AGAINST non-independent directors in cases in which the full board serves as the audit committee, or the company does not have an audit committee.

 

For issuers in all markets, including those in tax haven markets and those in Japan that have adopted the U.S.-style board-with-committees structure, vote AGAINST non-independent nominees to the audit committee, or, if the slate of nominees is bundled, vote AGAINST the slate.  If the slate is bundled and audit committee membership is unclear or proposed as a separate agenda item, vote FOR if the Agent otherwise recommends support.  For Canadian issuers, the Funds’ U.S. Guidelines with respect to audit committees shall apply.

 

In tax haven markets, DO NOT VOTE AGAINST non-independent directors in cases in which the full board serves as the compensation committee, or the company does not have a compensation committee.

 

DO NOT VOTE AGAINST non-independent directors who sit on the compensation or nominating committees, provided that such committees meet the applicable independence requirements of the relevant listing exchange.

 

In cases in which committee membership is unclear, consider non-independent director nominees on a CASE-BY-CASE basis if no other issues have been raised in connection with his/her nomination.

 

Generally follow Agent’s recommendations to vote AGAINST individuals nominated as outside/non-executive directors who do not meet the Agent’s standard for independence, unless the slate of nominees is bundled, in which case the proposal(s) to elect board members shall be considered on a CASE-BY-CASE basis.

 

For issuers in tax haven markets, generally withhold support (AGAINST or ABSTAIN, as appropriate) from bundled slates of nominees if the board is non-majority independent.  For issuers in Canada and other global markets, generally follow the Agent’s standards for withholding support from bundled slates or non-independent directors (typically excluding the CEO), as applicable, if the board does not meet the Agent’s independence standards or the board’s independence cannot be ascertained due to inadequate disclosure.

 

Generally, withhold support (AGAINST or ABSTAIN, as appropriate) from nominees or slates of nominees presented in a manner not aligned with market practice and/or legislation, including:

 

·                  bundled slates of nominees (e.g., France, Hong Kong or Spain);

 

·                  simultaneous reappointment of retiring directors (e.g., South Africa);

 

·                  in markets with term lengths capped by legislation or market practice, nominees whose terms exceed the caps or are not disclosed (except that bundled slates with such lack of disclosure shall be considered on a CASE-BY-CASE basis); or

 

39



 

·                  nominees whose names are not disclosed in advance of the meeting (e.g., Austria, Philippines, Hong Kong or South Africa) or far enough in advance relative to voting deadlines (e.g., Italy) to make an informed voting decision.

 

Such criteria will not generally provide grounds for withholding support in countries in which they may be identified as best practice but such legislation or market practice is not yet applicable, unless specific governance shortfalls identified by the Agent dictate that less latitude should be extended to the issuer.

 

Generally vote FOR nominees without regard to recommendations that the position of chairman should be separate from that of CEO or otherwise required to be independent, unless other concerns requiring CASE-BY-CASE consideration have been raised.

 

In cases in which cumulative or net voting applies, generally vote with Agent’s recommendation to support nominees asserted by the issuer to be independent, even if independence disclosure or criteria fall short of Agent’s standards.

 

Consider nominees for whom the Agent has raised concerns regarding scandals or internal controls on a CASE-BY-CASE basis, generally withholding support (AGAINST or ABSTAIN, as appropriate) from nominees or slates of nominees when:

 

·                  the scandal or shortfall in controls took place at the company, or an affiliate, for which the nominee is being considered;

 

·                  culpability can be attributed to the nominee (e.g., nominee manages or audits relevant function), and

 

·                  the nominee has been directly implicated, with resulting arrest and criminal charge or regulatory sanction.

 

For markets such as the tax havens, Australia, Canada, Hong Kong, Japan, Malaysia, Singapore and South Africa (and for outside directors in South Korea) in which nominees’ attendance records are adequately disclosed, the Funds’ U.S. Guidelines with respect to director attendance shall apply.  The same policy shall be applied regarding attendance by statutory auditors of Japanese companies.

 

Consider self-nominated director candidates on a CASE-BY-CASE basis, with voting decisions generally based on the Agent’s approach to evaluating such candidates.

 

Generally vote FOR nominees without regard to “over-boarding” issues raised by the Agent unless other concerns requiring CASE-BY-CASE consideration have been raised.

 

For companies incorporated in tax haven markets but which trade exclusively in the U.S., the Funds’ U.S. Guidelines with respect to director elections shall apply.

 

Board Structure

 

Generally, vote FOR proposals to fix board size, but also support proposals seeking a board range if the range is reasonable in the context of market practice and anti-takeover

 

40



 

considerations.  Proposed article amendments in this regard shall be considered on a CASE-BY-CASE basis, with voting decisions generally based on the Agent’s approach to evaluating such proposals.

 

Director and Officer Indemnification and Liability Protection

 

Generally, vote in accordance with the Agent’s standards for indemnification and liability protection for officers and directors, voting AGAINST overly broad provisions.

 

Independent Statutory Auditors

 

With respect to Japanese companies that have not adopted the U.S.-style board-with-committees structure, vote AGAINST any nominee to the position of “independent statutory auditor” whom the Agent considers affiliated, e.g., if the nominee has worked a significant portion of his career for the company, its main bank or one of its top shareholders.  Where shareholders are forced to vote on multiple nominees in a single resolution, vote AGAINST all nominees.  In cases in which multiple slates of statutory auditors are presented, generally vote with the Agent’s recommendation, typically to support nominees deemed to be more independent and/or aligned with interests of minority shareholders.

 

Generally, vote AGAINST incumbent nominees at companies implicated in scandals or exhibiting poor internal controls.

 

Key Committees

 

Generally, vote AGAINST proposals that permit non-board members to serve on the audit, compensation or nominating committee, provided that bundled slates may be supported if no slate nominee serves on the relevant committee(s).

 

Director and Statutory Auditor Remuneration

 

Consider director compensation plans on a CASE-BY-CASE basis, with voting decisions generally based on the Agent’s approach to evaluating such proposals, while also factoring in the merits of the rationale and disclosure provided.  Generally, vote FOR proposals to approve the remuneration of directors and auditors as long as the amount is not excessive (e.g., significant increases should be supported by adequate rationale and disclosure) and there is no evidence of abuse.  For Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX) issuers, the Agent’s limits with respect to equity awards to non-employee directors shall apply.

 

Bonus Payments

 

With respect to Japanese companies, generally vote FOR retirement bonus proposals if all payments are for directors and auditors who have served as executives of the company.  Generally vote AGAINST such proposals if one or more payments are for non-executive, affiliated directors or statutory auditors when one or more of the individuals to whom the grants are being proposed (1) has not served in an executive capacity for the company for at least three years or (2) has been designated by the company as an independent statutory auditor, regardless of the length of time he/she has served.  In all markets, if issues have been raised regarding a scandal or internal controls, generally vote AGAINST bonus proposals for retiring directors or continuing directors or auditors when culpability can be attributed to the nominee (e.g., if a Fund

 

41



 

is also voting AGAINST the nominee under criteria herein regarding issues of scandal or internal controls), unless bundled with bonuses for a majority of directors or auditors a Fund is voting FOR.

 

Stock Option Plans for Independent Internal Statutory Auditors

 

With respect to Japanese companies, follow the Agent’s guidelines with respect to proposals regarding option grants to independent internal statutory auditors, generally voting AGAINST such plans.

 

Compensation Plans

 

Unless otherwise provided for herein, votes with respect to compensation plans, and awards thereunder or capital issuances in support thereof, should be determined on a CASE-BY-CASE basis, with voting decisions generally based on the Agent’s approach to evaluating such plans, considering quantitative or qualitative factors as appropriate for the market.

 

Amendment Procedures for Equity Compensation Plans and ESPPs

 

For TSX issuers, votes with respect to amendment procedures for security-based compensation arrangements and employee share purchase plans shall generally be cast in a manner designed to preserve shareholder approval rights, with voting decisions generally based on the Agent’s recommendation.

 

Shares Reserved for Equity Compensation Plans

 

Unless otherwise provided for herein, voting decisions shall generally be based on the Agent’s methodology, including classification of a company’s stage of development as growth or mature and the corresponding determination as to reasonability of the share requests.

 

Generally, vote AGAINST equity compensation plans (e.g., option, warrant, restricted stock or employee share purchase plans or participation in company offerings such as IPOs or private placements), the issuance of shares in connection with such plans, or related management proposals (e.g., article amendments) that:

 

·                  exceed Agent’s recommended dilution limits, including cases in which the Agent suggests dilution cannot be fully assessed (e.g., due to inadequate disclosure);

 

·                  provide deep or near-term discounts to executives or directors, unless discounts to executives are deemed by the Agent to be adequately mitigated by other requirements such as long-term vesting (e.g., Japan) or broad-based employee participation otherwise meeting Agent’s standards (e.g., France);

 

·                  are administered with discretion by potential grant recipients;

 

·                  provide for retirement benefits or equity incentive awards to outside directors if not in line with market practice (e.g., Australia, Belgium, The Netherlands);

 

·                  permit financial assistance in the form of non-recourse (or essentially non-recourse) loans in connection with executive’s participation;

 

·                  for matching share plans, do not meet the Agent’s standards, considering holding period, discounts, dilution, participation, purchase price and performance criteria;

 

·                  provide for vesting upon change in control if deemed by the Agent to evidence a conflict of interest or anti-takeover device;

 

42



 

·                  provide no disclosure regarding vesting or performance criteria (provided that proposals providing disclosure in one or both areas, without regard to Agent’s criteria for such disclosure, shall be supported provided they otherwise satisfy these Guidelines);

 

·                  permit post-employment vesting if deemed inappropriate by the Agent;

 

·                  allow plan administrators to make material amendments without shareholder approval unless adequate prior disclosure has been provided, with such voting decisions generally based on the Agent’s approach to evaluating such plans; or

 

·                  provide for retesting in connection with achievement of performance hurdles unless the Agent’s analysis indicates that (1) performance targets are adequately increased in proportion to the additional time available, (2) the retesting is de minimis as a percentage of overall compensation or is acceptable relative to market practice, or (3) the issuer has committed to cease retesting within a reasonable period of time.

 

Generally, vote FOR such plans/awards or the related issuance of shares that (1) do not suffer from the defects noted above, or (2) otherwise meet the Agent’s tests if the considerations raised by the Agent pertain primarily to performance hurdles, contract or notice periods, discretionary bonuses, recruitment awards, retention incentives, non-compete payments or vesting upon change in control (other than addressed above), if the company has provided adequate disclosure and/or a reasonable rationale regarding the relevant plan/award, practice or participation.  Unless otherwise provided for herein, market practice of the primary country in which a company does business, or in which an employee is serving, as applicable, shall supersede that of the issuer’s domicile.

 

Consider proposals in connection with such plans or the related issuance of shares in other instances on a CASE-BY-CASE basis.

 

Remuneration Reports

 

Generally, withhold support (AGAINST or ABSTAIN as appropriate for specific market and level of concerns identified by the Agent) from remuneration reports that include compensation plans permitting:

 

(1)          practices or features not supported under these Guidelines, including financial assistance under the conditions described above;

(2)          retesting deemed by the Agent to be excessive relative to market practice (irrespective of the Agent’s support for the report as a whole);

(3)          equity award valuation triggering a negative recommendation from the Agent; or

(4)          provisions for retirement benefits or equity incentive awards to outside directors if not in line with market practice, except that reports will generally be voted FOR if contractual components are reasonably aligned with market practices on a going-forward basis (e.g., existing obligations related to retirement benefits or terms contrary to evolving standards would not preclude support for the report).

 

Reports receiving the Agent’s support and not triggering the concerns cited above will generally be voted FOR.  Unless otherwise provided for herein, reports not receiving the Agent’s support due to concerns regarding severance/termination payments, “leaver” status, incentive structures and vesting or performance criteria not otherwise supported by these Guidelines shall be

 

43



 

considered on a CASE-BY-CASE basis, generally voted FOR if the company has provided a reasonable rationale and/or adequate disclosure regarding the matter(s) under consideration.  Reports with typically unsupported features may be voted FOR in cases in which the Agent recommends their initial support as the issuer or market transitions to better practices (e.g., having committed to new regulations or governance codes).

 

Shareholder Proposals Regarding Executive and Director Pay

 

The Funds’ U.S. Guidelines with respect to such shareholder proposals shall apply.

 

General Share Issuances

 

Unless otherwise provided for herein, voting decisions shall generally be based on the Agent’s practice to determine support for general issuance requests (with or without preemptive rights), or related requests to repurchase and reissue shares, based on their amount relative to currently issued capital as well as market-specific considerations (e.g., priority right protections in France, reasonable levels of dilution and discount in Hong Kong).  Requests to reissue repurchased shares will not be supported unless a related general issuance request is also supported.

 

Consider specific issuance requests on a CASE-BY-CASE basis based on the proposed use and the company’s rationale.

 

Generally, vote AGAINST proposals to issue shares (with or without preemptive rights), convertible bonds or warrants, to grant rights to acquire shares, or to amend the corporate charter relative to such issuances or grants in cases in which concerns have been identified by the Agent with respect to inadequate disclosure, inadequate restrictions on discounts, failure to meet the Agent’s standards for general issuance requests, or authority to refresh share issuance amounts without prior shareholder approval.

 

Increases in Authorized Capital

 

Unless otherwise provided for herein, voting decisions should generally be based on the Agent’s approach, as follows:

 

·                  Generally, vote FOR nonspecific proposals, including bundled proposals, to increase authorized capital up to 100 percent over the current authorization unless the increase would leave the company with less than 30 percent of its new authorization outstanding.

 

·                  Vote FOR specific proposals to increase authorized capital, unless:

 

·                  the specific purpose of the increase (such as a share-based acquisition or merger) does not meet these Guidelines for the purpose being proposed; or

 

·                  the increase would leave the company with less than 30 percent of its new authorization outstanding after adjusting for all proposed issuances.

 

·                  Vote AGAINST proposals to adopt unlimited capital authorizations.

 

·                  The Agent’s market-specific exceptions to the above parameters (e.g., The Netherlands, due to hybrid market controls) shall be applied.

 

Preferred Stock

 

Unless otherwise provided for herein, voting decisions should generally be based on the Agent’s approach, including:

 

44



 

·                  Vote FOR the creation of a new class of preferred stock or issuances of preferred stock up to 50 percent of issued capital unless the terms of the preferred stock would adversely affect the rights of existing shareholders.

 

·                  Vote FOR the creation/issuance of convertible preferred stock as long as the maximum number of common shares that could be issued upon conversion meets the Agent’s guidelines on equity issuance requests.

 

·                  Vote AGAINST the creation of (1) a new class of preference shares that would carry superior voting rights to the common shares or (2) blank check preferred stock unless the board states that the authorization will not be used to thwart a takeover bid.

 

Poison Pills/Protective Preference Shares

 

Generally, vote AGAINST management proposals in connection with poison pills or anti-takeover activities (e.g., disclosure requirements or issuances, transfers or repurchases) that do not meet the Agent’s standards.  Generally vote in accordance with Agent’s recommendation to withhold support from a nominee in connection with poison pill or anti-takeover considerations when culpability for the actions can be specifically attributed to the nominee.  Generally DO NOT VOTE AGAINST director remuneration in connection with poison pill considerations raised by the Agent.

 

Approval of Financial Statements and Director and Auditor Reports

 

Generally, vote FOR management proposals seeking approval of financial accounts and reports, unless there is concern about the company’s financial accounts and reporting, which, in the case of related party transactions, would include concerns raised by the Agent regarding consulting agreements with non-executive directors.  Unless otherwise provided for herein, reports not receiving the Agent’s support due to concerns regarding severance/termination payments not otherwise supported by these Guidelines shall be considered on a CASE-BY-CASE basis, factoring in the merits of the rationale and disclosure provided.  Generally, vote AGAINST board-issued reports receiving a negative recommendation from the Agent due to concerns regarding independence of the board or the presence of non-independent directors on the audit committee.  However, generally do not withhold support from such proposals in connection with remuneration practices otherwise supported under these Guidelines or as a means of expressing disapproval of broader practices of the issuer or its board.

 

Remuneration of Auditors

 

Generally, vote FOR proposals to authorize the board to determine the remuneration of auditors, unless there is evidence of excessive compensation relative to the size and nature of the company.

 

Indemnification of Auditors

 

Generally, vote AGAINST proposals to indemnify auditors.

 

Ratification of Auditors and Approval of Auditors’ Fees

 

For Canadian issuers, the Funds’ U.S. Guidelines with respect to auditors and auditor fees shall apply.  For other markets, generally, follow the Agent’s standards for proposals seeking auditor

 

45



 

ratification or approval of auditors’ fees, which indicate a vote FOR such proposals for companies in the MSCI EAFE index, provided the level of audit fee disclosure meets the Agent’s standards.  In other cases, generally vote FOR such proposals unless there are material concerns raised by the Agent about the auditor’s practices or independence.

 

Allocation of Income and Dividends

 

Generally, vote FOR management proposals concerning allocation of income and the distribution of dividends, including adjustments to reserves to make capital available for such purposes.  In the event management offers multiple dividend proposals on the same agenda, primary consideration shall be given to input from the relevant Investment Professional(s).

 

Stock (Scrip) Dividend Alternatives

 

Generally, vote FOR most stock (scrip) dividend proposals, but vote AGAINST proposals that do not allow for a cash option unless management demonstrates that the cash option is harmful to shareholder value.

 

Debt Instruments

 

Generally, vote AGAINST proposals authorizing excessive discretion, as assessed by the Agent, to a board to issue or set terms for debt instruments (e.g., commercial paper).

 

Debt Issuance Requests

 

When evaluating a debt issuance request, the issuing company’s present financial situation is examined.  The main factor for analysis is the company’s current debt-to-equity ratio, or gearing level.  A high gearing level may incline markets and financial analysts to downgrade the company’s bond rating, increasing its investment risk factor in the process.  A gearing level up to 100 percent is considered acceptable.

 

Generally, vote FOR debt issuances for companies when the gearing level is between zero and 100 percent.  Review on a CASE-BY-CASE basis proposals where the issuance of debt will result in the gearing level being greater than 100 percent, or for which inadequate disclosure precludes calculation of the gearing level, comparing any such proposed debt issuance to industry and market standards, and with voting decisions generally based on the Agent’s approach to evaluating such requests.

 

Financing Plans

 

Generally, vote FOR the adoption of financing plans if they are in the best economic interests of shareholders.

 

Related Party Transactions

 

Consider related party transactions on a CASE-BY-CASE basis.  Generally, vote FOR approval of such transactions unless the agreement requests a strategic move outside the company’s charter or contains unfavorable or high-risk terms (e.g., deposits without security interest or guaranty).

 

46



 

Approval of Donations

 

Generally, vote AGAINST such proposals unless adequate, prior disclosure of amounts is provided; if so, single- or multi-year authorities may be supported.

 

Capitalization of Reserves

 

Generally, vote FOR proposals to capitalize the company’s reserves for bonus issues of shares or to increase the par value of shares.

 

Investment of Company Reserves

 

These proposals should generally be analyzed on a CASE-BY-CASE basis, with primary consideration given to input from the Investment Professional(s) for a given Fund.

 

Article Amendments

 

Review on a CASE-BY-CASE basis all proposals seeking amendments to the articles of association.

 

Generally, vote FOR an article amendment if:

 

·                  it is editorial in nature;

 

·                  shareholder rights are protected;

 

·                  there is negligible or positive impact on shareholder value;

 

·                  management provides adequate reasons for the amendments or the Agent otherwise supports management’s position;

 

·                  it seeks to discontinue and/or delist a form of the issuer’s securities in cases in which the relevant Fund does not hold the affected security type; or

 

·                  the company is required to do so by law (if applicable).

 

Generally, vote AGAINST an article amendment if:

 

·                  it removes or lowers quorum requirements for board or shareholder meetings below levels recommended by the Agent;

 

·                  it reduces relevant disclosure to shareholders;

 

·                  it seeks to align the articles with provisions of another proposal not supported by these Guidelines;

 

·                  it is not supported under these Guidelines, is presented within a bundled proposal, and the Agent deems the negative impact, on balance, to outweigh any positive impact; or

 

·                  it imposes a negative impact on existing shareholder rights, including rights of the Funds, to the extent that any positive impact would not be deemed by the Agent to be sufficient to outweigh removal or diminution of such rights.

 

With respect to article amendments for Japanese companies:

 

·                  Generally vote FOR management proposals to amend a company’s articles to expand its business lines.

 

·                  Generally vote FOR management proposals to amend a company’s articles to provide for an expansion or reduction in the size of the board, unless the expansion/reduction is

 

47



 

clearly disproportionate to the growth/decrease in the scale of the business or raises anti-takeover concerns.

 

·                  If anti-takeover concerns exist, generally vote AGAINST management proposals, including bundled proposals, to amend a company’s articles to authorize the Board to vary the annual meeting record date or to otherwise align them with provisions of a takeover defense.

 

·                  Generally follow the Agent’s guidelines with respect to management proposals regarding amendments to authorize share repurchases at the board’s discretion, voting AGAINST proposals unless there is little to no likelihood of a “creeping takeover” (major shareholder owns nearly enough shares to reach a critical control threshold) or constraints on liquidity (free float of shares is low), and where the company is trading at below book value or is facing a real likelihood of substantial share sales; or where this amendment is bundled with other amendments which are clearly in shareholders’ interest.

 

Other Business

 

In connection with global proxies, vote in accordance with the Agent’s market-specific recommendations on management proposals for Other Business, generally AGAINST.

 

48



 

Item 8.  Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies.

 

(a) (1) Portfolio Management. The following individuals comprise the investment committee of the Trust and share responsibility for the day-to-day management of the Trust’s portfolio:

 

Daniel A. Norman.  Mr. Norman is Senior Vice President and Senior Portfolio Manager in the Senior Debt Group, and has served in that capacity since November 1999. Prior to that, Mr. Norman was Senior Vice President and Portfolio Manager in the Senior Debt Group (since April 1995). Mr. Norman has managed the Trust since April 1995 and is responsible for the operations, analytics, legal and marketing areas for the Trust. Mr. Norman also serves as Senior Vice President of the Trust, and he serves as Senior Vice President of ING Senior Income Fund, another closed-end fund sub-advised by ING IM that invests primarily in Senior Loans. Mr. Norman co-manages the Trust with Mr. Bakalar.

 

Jeffrey A. Bakalar.  Mr. Bakalar is Senior Vice President and Senior Portfolio Manager in the Senior Debt Group, and has served in that capacity since November 1999. Prior to that, Mr. Bakalar was Senior Vice President and Portfolio Manager in the Senior Debt Group (since January 1998). Mr. Bakalar has managed the Trust since January 1998 and is responsible for overseeing the portfolio management of the Trust. Before joining ING Groep N.V., Mr. Bakalar was Vice President of The First National Bank of Chicago (from 1994 to 1998). Mr. Bakalar also serves as Senior Vice President of the Trust and as Senior Vice President of ING Senior Income Fund, another closed-end fund sub-advised by ING IM that invests primarily in Senior Loans. Mr. Bakalar co-manages the Trust with Mr. Norman.

 

Curtis F. Lee.  Mr. Lee is Senior Vice President and Chief Credit Officer in the Senior Debt Group and has served in that capacity since January 2001. Mr. Lee has managed the Trust since August 1999. Prior to joining the Investment Manager, Mr. Lee held a series of positions with Standard Chartered Bank in the credit approval and problem loan management functions (1992 - 1999). Mr. Lee also serves as Senior Vice President and Chief Credit Officer of the Trust (since January 2001), and he serves as Senior Vice President and Chief Credit Officer of ING Senior Income Fund, another closed-end fund sub-advised by ING IM that invests primarily in Senior Loans.

 

(a) (2) (i-iii) Other Accounts Managed

 

The following table shows the number of accounts and total assets in the accounts managed by the Portfolio Managers as of February 28, 2007.

 

 

 

Registered Investment
Companies

 

Other Pooled Investment Vehicles

 

Other Accts*

 

Portfolio Manager

 

Number of
Accounts

 

Total Assets
(in billions)

 

Number of
Accounts

 

Total Assets
(in billions)

 

Number of
Accounts

 

Total Assets
(in billions)

 

Daniel A. Norman

 

2

 

$

4.2b

 

0

 

$

0

 

13

 

$

3.5b

 

Jeffrey A. Bakalar

 

2

 

$

4.2b

 

0

 

$

0

 

13

 

$

3.5b

 

Curtis F. Lee

 

2

 

$

4.2b

 

0

 

$

0

 

13

 

$

3.5b

 

 


* Of these other accounts, none have an advisory fee based on performance.

 



 

(a) (2) (iv) Conflicts of Interest

 

A portfolio manager may be subject to potential conflicts of interest because the portfolio manager is responsible for other accounts in addition to the Trust.  These other accounts may include, among others, other mutual funds, separately managed advisory accounts, commingled trust accounts, insurance separate accounts, wrap fee programs and hedge funds.  Potential conflicts may arise out of the implementation of differing investment strategies for the portfolio manager’s various accounts, the allocation of investment opportunities among those accounts or differences in the advisory fees paid by the portfolio manager’s accounts.

 

A potential conflict of interest may arise as a result of the portfolio manager’s responsibility for multiple accounts with similar investment guidelines.  Under these circumstances, a potential investment may be suitable for more than one of the portfolio manager’s accounts, but the quantity of the investment available for purchase is less than the aggregate amount the accounts would ideally devote to the opportunity.  Similar conflicts may arise when multiple accounts seek to dispose of the same investment.

 

A portfolio manager may also manage accounts whose objectives and policies differ from those of the Trust.  These differences may be such that under certain circumstances, trading activity appropriate for one account managed by the portfolio manager may have adverse consequences for another account managed by the portfolio manager.  For example, if an account were to sell a significant position in a security, which could cause the market price of that security to decrease, while the Trust maintained its position in that security.

 

A potential conflict may arise when a portfolio manager is responsible for accounts that have different advisory fees – the difference in the fees may create an incentive for the portfolio manager to favor one account over another, for example, in terms of access to particularly appealing investment opportunities.  This conflict may be heightened where an account is subject to a performance-based fee.

 

As part of its compliance program, ING IM has adopted policies and procedures reasonably designed to address the potential conflicts of interest described above.

 

Finally, a potential conflict of interest may arise because the investment mandates for certain other accounts, such as hedge funds, may allow extensive use of short sales, which, in theory, could allow them to enter into short positions in securities where other accounts hold long positions. ING IM has policies and procedures reasonably designed to limit and monitor short sales by the other accounts to avoid harm to the Trust.

 

(a) (3) Compensation

 

Compensation consists of (a) fixed base salary; (b) bonus which is based on ING IM’s performance, one- and three-year pre-tax performance of the accounts the portfolio managers are primarily and jointly responsible for relative to account benchmarks and peer universe performance, and revenue growth of the accounts they are responsible for; and (c) long-term equity awards tied to the performance of our parent company, ING Groep.

 



 

Portfolio managers are also eligible to participate in an annual cash incentive plan.  The overall design of the ING IM annual incentive plan was developed to closely tie pay to performance, structured in such a way as to drive performance and promote retention of top talent.  As with base salary compensation, individual target awards are determined and set based on external market data and internal comparators.  Investment performance is measured on both relative and absolute performance in all areas.  ING IM has a defined index, the S&P’s LSTA Leveraged Loan Index and, where applicable, peer groups including but not limited to Russell, Morningstar, Inc. (“Morningstar”), Lipper Analytical Services, Inc. (“Lipper”) and Lehman and set performance goals to appropriately reflect requirements for each investment team.  The measures for each team are outlined on a “scorecard” that is reviewed on an annual basis.  These scorecards reflect a comprehensive approach to measuring investment performance versus both benchmarks and peer groups over one- and three-year periods and year-to-date net cash flow (changes in the accounts’ net assets not attributable to changes in the value of the accounts’ investments) for all accounts managed by the team.  The results for overall IIM scorecards are calculated on an asset weighted performance basis of the individual team scorecards.

 

Investment professionals’ performance measures for bonus determinations are weighted by 25% being attributable to the overall ING IM performance and 75% attributable to their specific team results (60% investment performance and 15% net cash revenue).

 

Based on job function, internal comparators and external market data, portfolio managers participate in the ING Long-Term Incentive Plan.  Plan awards are based on the current year’s performance as defined by the ING IM component of the annual incentive plan.  The awards vest in three years and are paid in a combination of ING restricted stock, stock options and restricted performance units.

 

Portfolio managers whose base salary compensation exceeds a particular threshold may participate in ING’s deferred compensation plan.  The plan provides an opportunity to invest deferred amounts of compensation in mutual funds, ING stock or at an annual fixed interest rate.  Deferral elections are done on an annual basis and the amount of compensation deferred is irrevocable.

 

(a) (4) Ownership of Securities

 

The following table shows the dollar range of shares of the Trust owned by each team member as of February 28, 2007, including investments by their immediate family members and amounts invested through retirement and deferred compensation plans.

 

 

 

Dollar Range of

 

Portfolio Manager

 

Trust Shares Owned

 

Daniel A. Norman

 

$50,001 - $100,00

 

Jeffrey A. Bakalar

 

$1 - $10,000

*

Curtis F. Lee

 

none

 

 


*   Mr. Bakalar sold all of his shares in June 2007.

 

(b) Not applicable.

 



 

Item 9.  Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers

 

None

 

Item 10.  Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

 

The Board has a Nominating Committee for the purpose of considering and presenting to the Board candidates it proposes for nomination to fill Independent Trustee vacancies on the Board.  The Committee currently consists of all Independent Trustees of the Board (6 individuals). The Nominating Committee operates pursuant to a Charter approved by the Board.  The primary purpose of the Nominating Committee is to consider and present to the Board the candidates it proposes for nomination to fill vacancies on the Board.  In evaluating candidates, the Nominating Committee may consider a variety of factors, but it has not at this time set any specific minimum qualifications that must be met. Specific qualifications of candidates for Board membership will be based on the needs of the Board at the time of nomination.

 

The Nominating Committee is willing to consider nominations received from shareholders and shall assess shareholder nominees in the same manner as it reviews its own nominees.  A shareholder nominee for director should be submitted in writing to the Fund’s Secretary.  Any such shareholder nomination should include at a minimum the following information as to each individual proposed for nomination as trustee: such individual’s written consent to be named in the proxy statement as a nominee (if nominated) and to serve as a trustee (if elected), and all information relating to such individual that is required to be disclosed in the solicitation of proxies for election of trustees, or is otherwise required, in each case under applicable federal securities laws, rules and regulations.

 

The Secretary shall submit all nominations received in a timely manner to the Nominating Committee.  To be timely, any such submission must be delivered to the Fund’s Secretary not earlier than the 90th day prior to such meeting and not later than the close of business on the later of the 60th day prior to such meeting or the 10th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of the meeting is first made, by either disclosure in a press release or in a document publicly filed by the Fund with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

Item 11.  Controls and Procedures.

 

(a)                                  Based on our evaluation conducted within 90 days of the filing date, hereof, the design and operation of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known to the certifying officers by others within the appropriate entities, particularly during the period in which Forms N-CSR are being prepared, and the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures allow timely preparation and review of the information for the registrant’s Form N-CSR and the officer certifications of such Form N-CSR.

 

(b)                                 There were no significant changes in the registrant’s internal controls that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Item 12. Exhibits.

 

(a)(1)                    Code of Ethics pursuant to Item 2 of Form N-CSR is filed and attached hereto as EX-99.CODE ETH.

 

(a)(2)                    A separate certification for each principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the registrant as required by Rule 30a-2 under the Act (17 CFR 270.30a-2) is attached hereto as EX-99.CERT.

 

(b)                                 The officer certifications required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 are attached hereto as EX-99.906CERT.

 

     (3)                   Not applicable.

 



 

SIGNATURES

 

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

(Registrant): ING Prime Rate Trust

 

 

By

/s/ Shaun P. Mathews

 

Shaun P. Mathews

 

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

Date:

May 9, 2008

 

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

 

By

/s/ Shaun P. Mathews

 

Shaun P. Mathews

 

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

Date:

May 9, 2008

 

 

By

/s/ Todd Modic

 

Todd Modic

 

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

 

Date:

May 9, 2008