United
States
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-K
x ANNUAL
REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For
the
fiscal year ended December
31, 2006.
or
o TRANSITION
REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For
the
transition period from _______ to ________.
Commission
file number: 1-5740
DIODES
INCORPORATED
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
|
|
95-2039518
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification Number)
|
3050
East Hillcrest Drive, Westlake Village,
California
|
|
91362
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip
Code)
|
Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code: (805) 446-4800
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title
of Each
Class
|
Name
of Each Exchange on Which
Registered
|
Common
Stock, Par Value $0.66
2/3
|
The
NASDAQ Stock Market
LLC
|
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined
in
Rule 405 of the Security Act. Yes x No
o
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to
Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No
x
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for
the past 90 days. Yes x No
o
Indicate
by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to
this
Form 10-K. o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated
filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act:
Large
accelerated filer x Accelerated
filer o Non-accelerated
filer o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Act). Yes o No
x
The
aggregate market value of the 19,269,401 shares of Common Stock held by
non-affiliates of the registrant, based on the closing price of $41.44 per
share
of the Common Stock on the Nasdaq Global Select Market on June 30, 2006, the
last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second quarter,
was approximately $798,523,977. The number of shares of the registrant’s Common
Stock outstanding as of February 26,
2007
was
26,036,304.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions
of the registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A in connection with the 2007
annual meeting of stockholders are incorporated by reference into Part III
of
this Report. The proxy statement will be filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission not later than 120 days after the registrant’s fiscal year ended
December 31, 2006.
PART
I
Item
1. Business
GENERAL
We
are
global supplier of low pin-count standard semiconductor products. These products
have 8 pins or less and include small signal transistors, MOSFETs, thyristor
surge protection devices, transient voltage protection devices, Hall sensors,
power management products, programmable logic arrays, diodes, recitifiers,
bridges, and silicon wafer. We
design, manufacture
and market these semiconductors focused on diverse end-use applications in
the
consumer electronics, computing, industrial, communications and automotive
sectors. Semiconductors, which provide electronic signal amplification and
switching functions, are basic building-block electronic components that
are
incorporated into almost every electronic device. We believe that our focus
on
Standard Semiconductor products provides us with a meaningful competitive
advantage relative to other semiconductor companies that provide a wider
range
of semiconductor products.
Our
portfolio of discrete and analog semiconductors addresses the design needs
of
many advanced electronic devices including high-volume consumer devices such
as
digital audio players, notebook computers, flat-panel displays, mobile handsets,
digital cameras and set-top boxes. We believe that we have particular strength
in designing innovative surface-mount semiconductors for applications with
critical need to minimize product size while maximizing power efficiency and
overall performance, and at a lower cost than alternative solutions. Our product
portfolio includes over 4,000 products, and we shipped approximately
7.5 billion units, 10.2 billion units, and 14.5 billion units in 2004,
2005, and 2006, respectively. From 2001 to 2006, our net sales grew from
$93.2 million to $343.3million, representing a compound annual growth rate
of 29.2%.
We
serve
over 150 direct customers worldwide, which consist of original equipment
manufacturers (OEMs) and electronic manufacturing services (EMS) providers.
Additionally, we have approximately 60 distributor customers worldwide, through
which we indirectly serve over 10,000 customers. Our customers include:
(i) industry leading OEMs, in a broad range of industries, such as Bose
Corporation, Honeywell International, Inc., LG Electronics, Inc., Logitech,
Inc., Motorola, Inc., Quanta Computer, Inc., Sagem Communication, Samsung
Electronics Co., Ltd. and Thompson, Inc.; (ii) leading EMS providers such
as Celestica, Inc., Flextronics International, Ltd., Hon Hai Precision Industry
Co., Ltd., Inventec Corporation, Jabil Circuit, Inc., Sanmina-SCI Corporation
and Solectron Corporation who build end-market products incorporating our
semiconductors for companies such as Apple Computer, Inc., Cisco Systems, Inc.,
Dell, Inc., EMC Corporation, Intel Corporation, Microsoft Corporation and Roche
Diagnostics; and (iii) leading distributors, such as Arrow Electronics,
Inc., Avnet, Inc., Future Electronics and Yosun Industrial Corp. For 2005 and
2006, our OEM and EMS customers together accounted for 69.5% and 54.2%,
respectively, of our net sales.
We
were
incorporated in 1959 in California and reincorporated in Delaware in 1969.
We
are
headquartered in Westlake Village, California, near Los Angeles. We have two
manufacturing facilities located in Shanghai, China, one analog design and
testing facility located in Hsinchu, Taiwan, and our wafer fabrication facility
is in Kansas City, Missouri. Our sales, marketing and logistical centers are
located in Taipei, Taiwan; Shanghai and Shenzhen, China; and Hong Kong. In
2006,
we strengthened our product design centers in Dallas, San Jose, Shanghai and
Taiwan to position our design engineers to work more closely with our customers
and enable us to deliver a stream of innovative solutions in our targeted
product categories. We also have regional sales offices and/or representatives
in: Derbyshire, England; Toulouse, France; Frankfurt, Germany; and in various
cities throughout the United States.
The
following diagram shows the entities through which we conduct our business
and
the principal services provided by each entity.
As
part
of our growth strategy, in December 2005, we announced the acquisition of
Anachip Corporation, a fabless Taiwanese semiconductor company focused on analog
ICs designed for specific applications, and in November 2006, we acquired the
net assets
of
APD Semiconductor, Inc., a privately held U.S.-based fabless semiconductor
company. See
“Our
Strategy” for more discussion of these acquisitions.
SEGMENT
REPORTING AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION
An
operating segment is defined as a component of an enterprise about which
separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by
the
chief decision maker, or decision-making group, in deciding how to allocate
resources and in assessing performance. Our chief decision-making group consists
of the President and Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Senior
Vice President of Operations, Senior Vice President of Sales and Marketing,
Vice
President of Asia Sales, and Senior Vice President of Finance. For financial
reporting purposes, we operate in a single segment, standard semiconductor
products, through our various manufacturing and distribution facilities. We
aggregated our standard products
since
the products are similar and have similar economic characteristics, and the
products are similar in production process and share the same customer
type.
Our
operations include the domestic operations (Diodes Incorporated and
Diodes-FabTech) located in the United States and the Asian operations
(Diodes-Taiwan, located in Taipei, Taiwan, and Diodes-Anachip located in
Hsinchu, Taiwan, Diodes-China and Diodes-Shanghai both located in Shanghai,
China, and Diodes-Hong Kong located in Hong Kong, China). For reporting
purposes, European operations are consolidated into the domestic (North America)
operations. Information
about our net revenues, assets and property, plant and equipment is described
in
our notes to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
OUR
INDUSTRY
Semiconductors
are critical components used in the manufacture of an increasing variety of
electronic products and systems. Since the invention of the transistor in 1948,
continuous improvements in semiconductor processes and design technologies
have
led to smaller, more complex and more reliable devices at a lower cost per
function. The availability of low-cost semiconductors, together with increased
customer demand for sophisticated electronic systems, has led to the
proliferation of semiconductors in diverse end-use applications in the consumer
electronics, computing, industrial, communications and automotive sectors.
These
factors have also led to an increase in the total number of semiconductor
components in individual electronic systems and an increase in value of these
components as a percentage of the total cost of the electronic systems in which
they are incorporated.
OUR
COMPETITIVE STRENGTHS
We
believe our competitive strengths include the following:
Flexible,
scalable and cost-effective manufacturing - Our
manufacturing operations are a core element of our success and we have designed
our manufacturing base to allow us to respond quickly to changes in demand
trends in the end-markets we serve. For example, we have structured our Shanghai
assembly, test and packaging
facilities to enable us to rapidly and efficiently add capacity and adjust
product mix to meet shifts in customer demand and overall market trends. As
a
result, for the past several years we have operated our Shanghai facilities
at
near full capacity, while at the same time significantly expanding that
capacity. Additionally, the Shanghai location of our manufacturing operations
provides us with access to a highly-skilled workforce at a low overall cost
base
while enabling us to better serve our leading customers, many of which are
located in Asia.
Integrated
packaging expertise - We
believe that we have particular expertise in designing and manufacturing
innovative and proprietary packaging solutions that integrate multiple separate
discrete elements into a single semiconductor product called an array. Our
ability to design and manufacture highly integrated semiconductor solutions
provides our customers with products of equivalent functionality with fewer
individual parts, and at lower overall cost, than alternative products. For
example, one of our leading diode array products integrates eight discrete
elements into a single highly miniaturized package that provides four times
the
functionality, with less than 20% of the space requirements of the previous
solution. This combination of integration, functionality and miniaturization
makes our products well suited for high-volume consumer applications such as
digital audio players, notebook computers and digital cameras.
Broad
customer base and diverse end-markets - Our
customers include leading OEMs such as Bose Corporation, Honeywell
International, Inc., LG Electronics, Inc., Logitech, Inc., Motorola, Inc.,
Quanta Computer, Inc., Sagem Communication, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and
Thompson, Inc., as well as leading EMS providers such as Celestica, Inc.,
Flextronics International, Ltd., Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd., Inventec
Corporation, Jabil Circuit, Inc., Sanmina-SCI Corporation and Solectron
Corporation. Overall, we serve over 150 direct customers and over 10,000
additional customers through our distributors, including leading distributors
such as Arrow Electronics, Inc., Avnet, Inc., Future Electronics and Yosun
Industrial Corp. Our products are ultimately used in end-products in a large
number of markets served by our broad base of customers, which we believe makes
us less dependent on either specific customers or specific end-use
applications.
Customer
focused product development - Effective
collaboration with our customers and a high degree of customer service are
essential elements of our business. We believe focusing on dependable delivery
of semiconductor solutions tailored to specific end-user applications, has
fostered deep customer relationships and created a key competitive advantage
for
us in the highly fragmented discrete semiconductor marketplace. We believe
our
close relationships with our OEM and EMS customers have provided us with deeper
insight into our customers’ product needs. This results in differentiation in
our product designs and often provides us with insight into additional
opportunities for new design wins in our customers’ products.
Management
continuity and experience -
We
believe that the continuity of our management team is a critical competitive
strength. Five members of our executive management team have an average of
over
13 years of service at the Company and the length of their service with us
has
created significant institutional insight into our markets, our customers and
our operations.
In
June
2005, we appointed Dr. Keh-Shew Lu as President and Chief Executive Officer.
Dr.
Lu has served as a director of Diodes since 2001 and has 30 years of relevant
industry experience. Dr. Lu began his career at Texas Instruments, Inc. in
1974
and retired in 2001 as Senior Vice President and General Manager of Worldwide
Analog, Mixed-Signal and Logic Products. Our Chief Financial Officer, Carl
Wertz, has been employed by us since 1993 and has over 20 years of financial
experience in manufacturing and distribution industries. Joseph Liu, our Senior
Vice President of Operations, joined us in 1990 and has over 30 years of
relevant industry experience having started his career in 1971 at Texas
Instruments. Similarly, Mark King, our Senior Vice President of Sales and
Marketing, has been employed by us since 1991, as has Steven Ho, our Vice
President of Asia Sales.
Joining
our executive management team in 2006 were: Richard White, Sr. Vice President
of
Finance, bringing with him 30 years of senior level finance experience,
including 25 years at Texas Instruments; Francis Tang, Vice President of Product
Development, promoted from Global Product Manager in May of 2006; and Edmund
Tang, Vice President of Corporate Administration, with 30 years of managerial
and engineering experience.
OUR
STRATEGY –
Our
strategy is to continue to enhance our position as a global supplier of standard semiconductor
products, and to continue to add other
product lines such as power management using our packaging technology
capability.
The
principal elements of this strategy include the following:
Continue
to rapidly introduce innovative discrete and analog semiconductor
products – We
intend
to maintain our rapid pace of new product introductions, especially for
high-volume, growth applications with short design cycles, such as digital
audio
players, notebook computers, flat-panel displays, mobile handsets, digital
cameras, set-top boxes and other consumer electronics and computing devices.
During 2006, we introduced approximately 218 new devices in approximately 30
different product families and achieved new design wins at over 100 OEMs. We
believe that continued introduction of new and differentiated product solutions
is critically important in maintaining and extending our market share in the
highly competitive semiconductor marketplace.
Expand
our available market opportunities – We
intend
to aggressively maximize our opportunities in the discrete and analog
semiconductor market as well as in related markets where we can apply our
semiconductor design and manufacturing expertise. A key element of this is
leveraging our highly integrated packaging expertise through our Application
Specific Multi-Chip Circuit (ASMCC) product platform, which consists of standard
arrays, function specific arrays and end-equipment specific arrays. We intend
to
achieve this by:
Ø |
Continuing
to focus on increasing packaging integration, particularly with our
existing standard array and customer-specific array products, in
order to
achieve products with increased circuit density, reduced component
count
and lower overall product cost;
|
Ø |
Expanding
existing products and developing new products in our function specific
array lines, which combine multiple discrete semiconductor components
to
achieve specific common electronic device functionality at a low
cost;
and
|
Ø |
Developing
new product lines, which we refer to as end-equipment specific arrays,
which combine discrete components with logic and/or standard analog
circuits to provide system-level solutions for high-volume, high-growth
applications.
|
Maintain
intense customer focus – We
intend
to strengthen and deepen our customer relationships. We believe that continued
focus on customer service would increase our net sales, operating performance
and overall market share. To accomplish this, we intend to continue to closely
collaborate with our customers to design products that meet their specific
needs. A critical element of this strategy is to continue to further reduce
our
design cycle time in order to quickly provide our customers with innovative
products. Additionally, to support our customer-focused strategy, we are
continuing to expand our sales force and field application engineers,
particularly in Asia and Europe.
Enhance
cost competitiveness –
A key
element of our success is our overall low-cost base. While we believe that
our
Shanghai manufacturing facilities are among the most efficient in the industry,
we will continue to refine our proprietary manufacturing processes and
technology to achieve additional cost efficiencies. Additionally, we intend
to
continue to operate our facilities at high utilization rates and to increase
product yields in order to achieve meaningful economies of scale.
Pursue
selective strategic acquisitions –
As part
of our strategy to expand our standard semiconductor
product offerings and to maximize our market opportunities, we may acquire
discrete, analog or mixed-signal technologies, product lines or companies in
order to support our ASMCC product platform and enhance our standard and new
product offerings.
In
December 2005, we announced the acquisition of Anachip Corporation, a fabless
Taiwanese semiconductor company focused on analog ICs designed for specific
applications, and headquartered
in the Hsinchu Science Park in Taiwan.
This
acquisition, which was completed on January 10, 2006, fits in the center of
our
long-term
strategy. Anachip’s main product focus is power management ICs. The analog
devices they produce are used in LCD monitor/TV's, wireless LAN 802.11 access
points, brushless DC motor fans, portable DVD players, datacom devices, ADSL
modems, TV/satellite set-top boxes, and power supplies. Anachip brings a design
team with strong capabilities in a range of targeted analog and power management
technologies.
On
November 3, 2006, we purchased the net assets
of
APD Semiconductor, Inc., a privately held U.S.-based fabless semiconductor
company.
APD
Semiconductor is headquartered in Redwood City, California, with a sales,
application, and administration center in Taipei, Taiwan. APD Semiconductor’s
main product focus is its patented and trademarked Super Barrier Rectifier
(“SBR”) technology. Utilizing a low cost IC wafer process, the SBR technology
uses a MOS cellular design to replace standard traditional Schottky or PN
junction diodes. The SBR technology uses an innovative-patented process
technique that allows its key parameters to be easily tuned to optimize any
customer applications. This adaptive and scalable technology allows for
increased power saving with better efficiency and reliability at higher
operating temperatures for end user applications like digital audio players,
DC/DC converters. AC/DC power supplies, LCD monitors, Power-over-Ethernet (POE),
Power Factor Correction (PFC) and TV/satellite set-top boxes. The SBR technology
offers industry-leading products like the SBR20U100CT, which has the lowest
forward voltage and highest efficiency and power saving in its class. The APD
acquisition will further strengthen our technology leadership in the discrete
semiconductor market and expand our product capabilities across important
segments of our end-markets.
FOLLOW-ON
PUBLIC OFFERING
In
October 2005, we sold 2,125,000 shares of our Common Stock in a follow-on public
offering, raising approximately $71.7 million (net of commissions and expenses).
We used approximately $31 million and $8 million of the proceeds in connection
with the Anachip and ADP acquisitions, respectively, and we
intend
to use the remaining net proceeds from this offering for working capital and
other general corporate purposes, including additional
acquisitions.
CONVERTIBLE
BONDS OFFERING
On
October 12, 2006, we issued and sold convertible senior notes with an aggregate
principal amount of $230 million due 2026 (“Notes”), which pay 2.25% interest
per annum on the principal amount of the notes, payable semi-annually in arrears
on April 1 and October 1 of each year, beginning on April 1, 2007.
The
Notes
will be convertible into cash or, at our option, cash and shares of our Common
Stock based on an initial conversion rate, subject to adjustment, of 17.0946
shares per $1,000 principal amount of Notes (which represents an initial
conversion price of $58.50 per share), in certain circumstances. In addition,
following a “make-whole fundamental change” that occurs prior to October 1,
2011, we will, at our option, increase the conversion rate for a holder who
elects to convert its Notes in connection with such “make-whole fundamental
change,” in certain circumstances.
We
intend
to use the net proceeds for working capital and general corporate purposes,
which may include the acquisition of businesses, products, product rights or
technologies, strategic investments, or purchases of Common Stock.
OUR
PRODUCTS
Our
product portfolio includes over 4,000 products that are designed for use in
high-volume consumer devices such as digital audio players, notebook computers,
flat-panel displays, mobile handsets, digital cameras and set-top boxes. We
target and serve end-equipment market segments that we believe have higher
growth rates than other
end-equipment market segments served by the overall semiconductor
industry.
Our
broad
product line includes:
Ø |
Discrete
semiconductor products, including performance Schottky rectifiers;
performance Schottky diodes; Zener diodes and performance Zener diodes,
including tight tolerance and low operating current types; standard,
fast,
super-fast and ultra-fast recovery rectifiers; bridge rectifiers;
switching diodes; small signal bipolar transistors; prebiased transistors;
MOSFETs; thyristor surge protection devices; and transient voltage
suppressors;
|
Ø |
Complex
high-density diode, transistor and mixed technology arrays, in multi-pin
ultra-miniature surface-mount packages, including customer specific
and
function specific arrays;
|
Ø |
Silicon
wafers used in manufacturing these products;
and
|
Ø |
Power
management devices, Hall sensors and programmable logic
arrays
|
Our
semiconductor products are an essential building-block of electronic circuit
design and are available in thousands of permutations varying according to
voltage, current, power handling capability and switching speed.
Our
complex diode and transistor arrays help bridge the gap between discrete
semiconductors and integrated circuits. Arrays consist of multiple discrete
semiconductor devices housed in a single package. Our discrete surface-mount
devices, which are components that can be attached to the surface of a substrate
with solder, target end-equipment categories with critical needs to minimize
size while maintaining power efficiency and performance.
The
following table lists the end-markets, some of the applications in which our
products are used, and the percentage of net sales for each end market for
the
last three years:
End
Markets
|
2004
|
2005
|
2006
|
End
product applications
|
Consumer
Electronics
|
37%
|
38%
|
36%
|
Set-top
boxes, game consoles, digital audio players, digital cameras, mobile
handsets, flat-panel displays, personal medical devices
|
Computing
|
31%
|
34%
|
36%
|
Notebooks,
flat-panel monitors, motherboards, PDAs, multi-function printers,
servers,
network interface cards, hard disk drives
|
Communications
|
8%
|
17%
|
14%
|
Gateways,
routers, switches, hubs, fiber optics, DSL, cable and standard modems,
networking (wireless, ethernet, power/phone line)
|
Industrial
|
19%
|
7%
|
12%
|
Ballast
lighting, power supplies, DC-DC conversion, security/access systems,
motor
controls, HVAC
|
Automotive
|
5%
|
4%
|
2%
|
Comfort
controls, audio/video players, GPS navigation, safety, security,
satellite
radios, engine controls, HID
lighting
|
PRODUCT
PACKAGING
Our
device packaging technology includes a wide variety of surface-mount and leaded
types. Our focus on the development of smaller, more thermally efficient, and
increasingly integrated packaging, is an important component of our product
development. We provide a comprehensive offering of miniature and sub-miniature
packaging, enabling us to fit discrete components into smaller and more
efficient packages, while maintaining the same device functionality and power
handling capabilities. Smaller packaging provides a reduction in the height,
weight and board space required for our components, and is well suited for
battery-powered, hand-held and wireless consumer applications such as digital
audio players, notebook computers, flat-panel displays, mobile handsets, digital
cameras and set-top boxes.
CUSTOMERS
We
serve
over 150 direct customers worldwide, which consist of OEMs and EMS providers.
Additionally, we have approximately 60 distributor customers worldwide, through
which we indirectly serve over 10,000 customers. Our customers include:
(i) industry leading OEMs in a broad range of industries, such as Bose
Corporation, Honeywell International, Inc., LG Electronics, Inc., Logitech,
Inc., Motorola, Inc., Quanta Computer, Inc., Sagem Communication, Samsung
Electronics Co., Ltd. and Thompson, Inc.; (ii) leading EMS providers, such
as Celestica, Inc., Flextronics International, Ltd., Hon Hai Precision Industry
Co., Ltd., Inventec Corporation, Jabil Circuit, Inc., Sanmina-SCI Corporation
and Solectron Corporation, who build end-market products incorporating our
semiconductors for companies such as Apple Computer, Inc., Cisco Systems, Inc.,
Dell, Inc., EMC Corporation, Intel Corporation, Microsoft Corporation and Roche
Diagnostics; and (iii) leading distributors such as Arrow Electronics,
Inc., Avnet, Inc., Future Electronics and Yosun Industrial Corp. For the years
of 2004, 2005 and 2006, our OEM and EMS customers together accounted for 66.3%,
69.5% and 54.2%, respectively, of our net sales. The acquisition of Anachip,
which sold products predominantly through distributors, is the major contributor
to the increase in the percentage of our total net sales sold to
distributors.
For
the
year ended December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2006, Lite-On Semiconductor
Corporation (LSC), which is also our largest stockholder, (owning approximately
22.3% of our Common Stock as of December 31, 2006), accounted for approximately
9.6% and 6.5%, respectively, of our net sales. Additionally, other members
of
The Lite-On Group of companies accounted for 4.2% and 2.3%, respectively, of
our
net sales in 2005 and 2006. No other customer accounted for 10% or more of
our
net sales in 2005 and 2006. Also, 14.7% and 13.0% of our net sales were from
the
subsequent sale of products we purchased from LSC in 2005 and 2006,
respectively. We believe each member of The Lite On Group of companies makes
independent purchasing decisions. See “Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions.”
We
believe that our close relationships with our OEM and EMS customers have
provided us with deeper insight into our customers’ product needs than other
manufacturers who we believe depend to a greater extent on indirect sales
through distributors. In addition to seeking to expand relationships with our
existing customers, our strategy is to pursue new customers and diversify our
customer base by focusing on leading global consumer electronics companies
and
their EMS providers and distributors.
We
generally warrant that products sold to our customers will, at the time of
shipment, be free from defects in workmanship and materials and conform to
our
approved specifications. Subject to certain exceptions, our standard warranty
extends for a period of one year from the date of shipment. Warranty expense
to
date has not been significant. Generally, our customers may cancel orders on
short notice without incurring a significant penalty.
Many
of
our customers are based in Asia. Net sales by country consists of sales to
customers assigned to that country based on the country to which the product
is
shipped. For the year ended December 31, 2006, 34.5%, 28.1%, 22.2%, and
15.2% of our net sales were derived from China, Taiwan, the United States and
all other markets, respectively, compared to 31.7%, 27.9%, 25.6% and 14.8%,
respectively, for 2005.
SALES
AND MARKETING
We
market
and sell our products worldwide through a combination of direct sales and
marketing personnel, independent sales representatives and distributors. We
have
direct sales personnel in the United States, United Kingdom, France, Germany,
Taiwan and China. We also have independent sales representatives in the United
States, Japan, Korea, and Europe. We currently have distributors in the United
States, Europe and Asia.
As
of
December 31, 2006, our direct global sales and marketing organization consisted
of approximately 160 employees operating out of 18 offices. We have
sales and marketing offices or representatives in Taipei, Taiwan; Shanghai
and
Shenzhen, China; Hong Kong; Derbyshire, England; Toulouse, France; Frankfurt,
Germany; and we have five regional sales offices in the United States. As of
December 31, 2006, we also had approximately 20 independent sales
representative firms marketing our products.
Our
marketing group focuses on our product strategy, product development road map,
new product introduction process, demand assessment and competitive analysis.
Our marketing programs include participation in industry tradeshows, technical
conferences and technology seminars, sales training and public relations. The
marketing group works closely with our sales and research and development groups
to align our product development road map. The marketing group coordinates
its
efforts with our product development, operations and sales groups, as well
as
with our customers, sales representatives and distributors. We support our
customers through our field application engineering and customer support
organizations.
To
support our global customer-base, our website is language-selectable into
English, Chinese, and Korean, giving us an effective marketing tool for
worldwide markets. With its extensive online product catalog with advanced
search capabilities, our website facilitates quick and easy product selection.
Our website provides easy access to our worldwide sales contacts and customer
support, and incorporates a distributor-inventory check to provide component
inventory availability and a small order desk for overnight sample fulfillment.
Our website, www.diodes.com, also provides access to investor financial
information and our corporate governance information.
MANUFACTURING
OPERATIONS AND FACILITIES
We
operate four manufacturing facilities, two of which are located in Shanghai,
China. The third is located in Kansas City, Missouri, and the newly acquired
Anachip facility is located at Hsinchu, Taiwan. Our facilities in Shanghai
perform packaging, assembly and testing functions, and our Kansas City facility
is a 5-inch wafer foundry. Anachip’s
main product focus is power management ICs.
As
of
December 31, 2006, we had invested approximately $127.2 million in
plant and state-of-the-art equipment in China. Both of our Chinese factories
manufacture product for sale by our U.S. and Asian operations, and also sell
to
external customers. Silicon wafers are received and inspected in a highly
controlled “clean room” environment awaiting the assembly operation. At the
first step of assembly, the wafers are sawn with very thin, high speed diamond
blades into tiny semiconductor “dice”, numbering as many as 170,000 per
5-inch diameter wafer. Dice are then loaded onto a handler, which automatically
places the dice, one by one, onto lead frames, which are package specific,
where
they are bonded to the lead-frame pad. Next, automatic wire bonders make the
necessary electrical connections from the die to the leads of the lead-frame,
using micro-thin gold wire. Our fully automated assembly machinery then molds
the epoxy case around the die and lead-frame to produce the desired
semiconductor product. After a trim, form, test, mark and re-test operation,
the
parts are placed into special carrier housings and a cover tape seals the parts
in place. The taped parts are then spooled onto reels or placed into other
packaging medium and boxed for shipment.
Our
manufacturing processes use many raw materials, including silicon wafers, copper
lead frames, gold wire and other metals, molding compounds and various chemicals
and gases. We have no material agreements with any of our suppliers that impose
minimum or continuing supply obligations. From time to time, suppliers may
extend lead times, limit supplies or increase prices due to capacity constraints
or other factors. Although we believe that supplies of the raw materials we
use
are currently and will continue to be available, shortages could occur in
various essential materials due to interruption of supply or increased demand
in
the industry.
In
the
United States, our corporate headquarters are located in a leased facility
in
Westlake Village, California, approximately 30 miles northwest of Los
Angeles. We also lease or own properties around the world for use as sales
offices, research and development labs, warehouses and logistic centers. The
size and/or location of these properties change from time to time based on
business requirements. In 2006, we purchased a building in Taipei, Taiwan for
approximately $6.0 million (see Item 2 - Properties).
BACKLOG
The
amount of backlog to be shipped during any period is dependent upon various
factors, and all orders are subject to cancellation or modification, usually
with no penalty to the customer. Orders are generally booked from one month
to
greater than six months in advance of delivery. The rate of booking of new
orders can vary significantly from month to month. We, and the industry as
a
whole, are experiencing a trend towards shorter lead-times. The amount of
backlog at any date depends upon various factors, including the timing of the
receipt of orders, fluctuations in orders of existing product lines, and the
introduction of any new lines. Accordingly, we believe that the amount of our
backlog at any date is not a particularly useful measure of our future sales.
We
strive to maintain proper inventory levels to support our customers’
just-in-time order expectations.
PATENTS,
TRADEMARKS AND LICENSES
Although
patents and trademarks have not been material to our business to date, they
may
become more significant in the future, particularly as they relate to our
packaging and analog technologies.
Through
our APD asset acquisition, we acquired the Super Barrier Rectifier technology
(less than 500V) and the SBR trademark. SBR is state-of-the-art integrated
circuit wafer processing technology that allows the design and manufacture
of a
device, which is able to integrate and improve the benefits of the two existing
rectifier technologies into a single device. The creation of a finite conduction
cellular IC, combined with inherent design uniformity has allowed manufacturing
costs to be kept competitive with existing power device technology, thus
producing breakthrough in rectifier technology.
Currently,
our licensing of patents to other companies is not material. We do, however,
license certain product technology from other companies, but we do not consider
any of the licensed technology to be material in terms of royalties. We believe
the duration and other terms of the licenses are appropriate for our current
needs.
COMPETITION
Numerous
semiconductor manufacturers and distributors serve the discrete semiconductor
components market, making competition intense. Some of our larger competitors
include Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation, Infineon Technologies A.G.,
International Rectifier Corporation, ON Semiconductor Corporation, Philips
Electronics N.V. (NXP), Rohm Electronics USA, LLC, Toshiba Corporation and
Vishay Intertechnology, Inc., many of which have greater financial, marketing,
distribution and other resources than us. Accordingly, in response to market
conditions, we from time to time may reposition product lines or decrease
prices, which may affect our sales of, and profit margins on, such product
lines. The price and quality of the product, and our ability to design products
and deliver customer service in keeping with the customers’ needs, determine the
competitiveness of our products. We believe that our product focus and our
flexibility and ability to quickly adapt to customer needs affords us
competitive advantages.
ENGINEERING
AND RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
Our
engineering and research and development groups consist of applications,
technical marketing, and product development engineers who assist in determining
the direction of our future product lines. Their primary function is to work
closely with market-leading customers to further refine, expand and improve
our
product range within our product types and packages. In addition, customer
requirements and acceptance of new package types are assessed and new,
higher-density and more energy-efficient packages are developed to satisfy
customers’ needs. Working with customers to integrate multiple types of
technologies within the same package, our applications engineers strive to
reduce the required number of components and, thus, circuit board size
requirements of a device, while increasing the functionality of the component
technology.
Product
engineers work directly with our semiconductor wafer design and process
engineers who craft die designs needed for products that precisely match our
customers’ requirements. Direct contact with our manufacturing facilities allows
the manufacturing of products that are in line with current technical
requirements. We have the capability to capture the customer’s electrical and
packaging requirements through their product development engineers, and then
transfer those requirements to our research and development and engineering
department, so that the customer’s requirements can be translated, designed, and
manufactured with full control, even to the elemental silicon
level.
For
the
years ended December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006, investment in research and
development was $3.4 million, $3.7 million and $8.3 million,
respectively. As a percentage of net sales, research and development expense
was
1.8%, 1.7% and 2.4% for 2004, 2005 and 2006, respectively. We anticipate
research and development to increase in absolute dollars and to be in the range
of 2-3% of net sales as we continue to develop proprietary technology.
EMPLOYEES
As
of
December 31, 2006, we employed a total of 2,268 employees, of which 1,910 of
our
employees were in Asia, 352 were in the United States and six were in Europe.
None of our employees is subject to a collective bargaining agreement. We
consider our relations with our employees to be satisfactory.
ENVIRONMENTAL
MATTERS
We
are
subject to a variety of U.S. federal, state, local and foreign governmental
laws, rules and regulations related to the use, storage, handling, discharge
or
disposal of certain toxic, volatile or otherwise hazardous chemicals used in
our
manufacturing process both in the United States where our wafer fabrication
facility is located, and in China where our assembly, test and packaging
facilities are located. Any of these regulations could require us to acquire
equipment or to incur substantial other expenses to comply with environmental
regulations. As of December 31, 2006, there were no known environmental claims
or recorded liabilities.
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
We
conduct business with two related party companies, LSC (and its subsidiaries
and
affiliates) and Keylink International (formerly Xing International) (and its
subsidiaries). LSC is our largest stockholder and owned 22.3% of our outstanding
Common Stock as of December 31, 2006. Keylink International is our 5% joint
venture partner in Diodes-China and Diodes-Shanghai. C.H. Chen, our former
President and Chief Executive Officer, and Vice Chairman of our Board of
Directors, is also Vice Chairman of LSC. M.K. Lu, a member of our Board of
Directors, is President of LSC. In addition, Raymond Soong, the Chairman of
our
Board of Directors, is Chairman of LSC, and is the Chairman of Lite-On
Technology Corporation, a significant shareholder of LSC. In connection with
our
2005 follow-on public offering, LSC sold 750,000 shares (1,125,000
split-adjusted shares at December 1, 2005), reducing its holdings of our Common
Stock to approximately 5.8 million shares (split adjusted). We did not receive
any of the proceeds from their sale of our Common Stock. LSC shared in the
expenses of the offering.
The
Audit
Committee of our Board of Director reviews all related party transactions for
potential conflict of interest situations, and approves all such transactions,
in accordance with such procedures as it may adopt from time to time. We believe
that all related party transactions are on terms no less favorable to us than
would be obtained from unaffiliated third parties.
In
2006,
we sold silicon wafers to LSC representing 6.5% (9.6% in 2005 and 11.1% in
2004)
of our sales, making LSC our largest customer. Also for 2006, 13.0% (14.7%
in
2005 and 17.2% in 2004) of our net sales were from discrete semiconductor
products purchased from LSC for subsequent sale by us, making LSC our largest
outside supplier. In addition, companies affiliated with LSC, which we refer
to
collectively as The Lite-On Group, accounted for 3.3%, 4.2% and 2.3% of our
net
sales, respectively, in 2004, 2005 and 2006. We also rent warehouse space in
Hong Kong from a member of The Lite-On Group, which also provides us with
warehousing and logistics services at that Hong Kong location. For 2004, 2005
and 2006, we reimbursed this entity in aggregate amounts of $190,000, $288,000
and $474,000, respectively, for these items. Such transactions are on terms
no
less favorable to us than could be obtained from unaffiliated third parties.
The
Audit Committee of the Board of Directors has approved the arrangements we
have
with these related party transactions.
In
December 2000, we acquired a wafer foundry, FabTech, Inc., from LSC for
approximately $6.0 million cash plus $19.0 million in assumed debt (the debt
was
due primarily to LSC). In connection with the acquisition, LSC entered into
a
volume purchase agreement to purchase wafers from FabTech. In addition, in
accordance with the terms of the acquisition, we also entered into management
incentive agreements with several members of FabTech’s management. The
agreements provided members of FabTech's management with guaranteed annual
payments as well as contingent bonuses based on the annual profitability of
FabTech, subject to a maximum annual amount. LSC reimbursed us for any portion
of the guaranteed and contingent liability paid by FabTech. The final year
of
the management incentive agreements was 2004, with final payment made on
March 31, 2005. LSC reimbursed us $375,000 in each of 2003, 2004, and 2005
for amounts paid by us under these management incentive agreements.
In
2006,
we sold silicon wafers to companies owned by Keylink International totaling
0.4%
(0.6% in 2005 and 0.9% in 2004) of our net sales. Also for 2006, 2.3% (3.0%
in
2005 and 3.5% in 2004) of our sales were from semiconductor products purchased
from companies owned by Keylink International. In addition, Diodes-China and
Diodes-Shanghai lease their manufacturing facilities from, and subcontract
a
portion of their manufacturing process (metal plating and environmental waste
services) to, Keylink International. We also pay a consulting fee to Keylink
International. In 2004, 2005 and 2006, we paid Keylink International an
aggregate of $4.8 million, $6.6 million and $7.9 million,
respectively, with respect to these items. We believe such transactions are
on
terms no less favorable to us than could be obtained from unaffiliated third
parties. The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors has approved the
contracts associated with these related party transactions.
On
December 20, 2005, we entered into a definitive stock purchase agreement to
acquire Anachip Corporation, a Taiwanese fabless analog IC company, and
headquartered in the Hsinchu Science Park in Taiwan.
The selling shareholders included LSC (which owned approximately 60% of
Anachip's outstanding capital stock), and two Taiwanese venture capital firms
(together owning approximately 20% of Anachip's stock), as well as current
and
former Anachip employees. At December 31, 2005, we had purchased an aggregate
of
9,433,613 shares (or approximately 18.9%) of the 50,000,000 outstanding shares
of the capital stock of Anachip. On January 10, 2006 (the closing date of
the acquisition), we purchased an additional 40,470,212 shares and therefore,
we
now hold approximately 99.81% of the Anachip capital stock.
Concurrent
with the acquisition, Anachip entered into a wafer purchase agreement with
LSC,
pursuant to which LSC will sell to Anachip, according to Anachip's requirements,
during the two year period ending on December 31, 2007, wafers of the same
or
similar type, and meeting the same specifications, as those wafers purchased
from LSC by Anachip at the time of the acquisition. Anachip will purchase such
wafers on terms (including purchase price, delivery schedule, and payment terms)
no less favorable to Anachip than those terms on which Anachip purchased such
wafers from LSC at the time of the acquisition provided; however, that the
purchase price will be the lower of the current price or the most favorable
customer pricing. If the price of raw wafers increases by more than 20% within
any six-month period, Anachip and LSC will renegotiate in good faith the price
of wafers to reflect the cost increase.
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION ABOUT GEOGRAPHIC AREAS
We
sell
product primarily through our operations in North America, Asia and Europe.
See
Note 15 of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” for a description of our
geographic information.
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION ABOUT FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC OPERATIONS AND EXPORT
SALES
With
respect to foreign operations, see Notes 1 and 15 of “Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements.”
AVAILABLE
INFORMATION
Our
website address is http://www.diodes.com. We make available, free of charge
through our website, our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on
Form
10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, Proxy Statements, and amendments to those
reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange
Act as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically
filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).
Our
filings may also be read and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F
Street NE, Room 1580 Washington, DC 20549. Information on the operation of
the
Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330.
The
SEC also maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information
statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically
with the SEC. The address of that website is www.sec.gov.
To
support our global customer base, our website is language-selectable into
English, Chinese, and Korean, giving us an effective marketing tool for
worldwide markets. With its extensive online Product (Parametric) Catalog with
advanced search capabilities, our website facilitates quick and easy product
selection. Our website provides easy access to worldwide sales contacts and
customer support, and incorporates a distributor-inventory check to provide
component inventory availability and a small order desk for overnight sample
fulfillment. Our website also provides access to current and complete investor
financial information and corporate governance information including our Code
of
Business Conduct, as well as SEC filings and press releases, and stock
quotes.
Cautionary
Statement for Purposes of the “Safe Harbor” Provision of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995
Many
of
the statements included in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K
contain
forward-looking statements and information relating to our company. We generally
identify forward-looking statements by the use of terminology such as “may,”
“will,” “could,” “should,” “potential,” “continue,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,”
“estimate,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “project,” or similar phrases or the
negatives of such terms. We base these statements on our beliefs as well as
assumptions we made using information currently available to us. Such statements
are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions, including those identified
in “Risk Factors,” as well as other matters not yet known to us or not currently
considered material by us. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties
materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results
may vary materially from those anticipated, estimated or projected. Given these
risks and uncertainties, prospective investors are cautioned not to place undue
reliance on such forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements do
not
guarantee future performance and should not be considered as statements of
fact.
You
should not unduly rely on these forward-looking statements, which speak only
as
of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Unless required by law, we
undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking
statements to reflect new information or future events or otherwise.
The
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the “Act”) provides certain
“safe harbor” provisions for forward-looking statements. All forward-looking
statements made on this Annual Report on Form 10-K are made pursuant to the
Act.
Item
1A. Risk
Factors
Investing
in our Common Stock involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully
consider the following risks and other information in this report before you
decide to buy our Common Stock. Our business, financial condition or operating
results may suffer if any of the following risks are realized. Additional risks
and uncertainties not currently known to us may also adversely affect our
business, financial condition or operating results. If any of these risks or
uncertainties occurs, the trading price of our Common Stock could decline and
you could lose part or all of your investment.
RISKS
RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS
Downturns
in the highly cyclical semiconductor industry or changes in end-market demand
could affect our operating results and financial
condition.
The
semiconductor industry is highly cyclical, and periodically experiences
significant economic downturns characterized by diminished product demand,
production overcapacity and excess inventory, which can result in rapid erosion
in average selling prices. From time to time, the semiconductor industry
experiences order cancellations and reduced demand for products, resulting
in
significant revenue declines, due to excess inventories at computer and
telecommunications equipment manufacturers and general economic conditions,
especially in the technology sector. The market for semiconductors may
experience renewed, and possibly more severe and prolonged downturns in the
future, which may harm our results of operations and reduce the value of our
business.
In
addition, we operate in a narrower market of the broader semiconductor market
and, as a result, cyclical fluctuations may affect this segment to a greater
extent than they do the broader semiconductor market. This may cause us to
experience greater fluctuations in our results of operations than compared
to
some of our broad line semiconductor manufacturer competitors. In addition,
we
may experience significant changes in our profitability as a result of
variations in sales, changes in product mix, changes in end-user markets and
the
costs associated with the introduction of new products. The markets for our
products depend on continued demand in the consumer electronics, computer,
industrial, communications and automotive sectors. These end-user markets also
tend to be cyclical and may also experience changes in demand that could
adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.
The
semiconductor business is highly competitive, and increased competition may
harm
our business and our operating results.
The
sectors of the semiconductor industry in which we operate are highly
competitive. We expect intensified competition from existing competitors and
new
entrants. Competition is based on price, product performance, product
availability, quality, reliability and customer service. We compete in various
markets with companies of various sizes, many of which are larger and have
greater resources or capabilities as it relates to financial, marketing,
distribution, brand name recognition, research and development, manufacturing
and other resources than we have. As a result, they may be better able to
develop new products, market their products, pursue acquisition candidates
and
withstand adverse economic or market conditions. Most of our current major
competitors are broad line semiconductor manufacturers who often have a wider
range of product types and technologies than we do. In addition, companies
not
currently in direct competition with us may introduce competing products in
the
future. Some of our current major competitors are Fairchild Semiconductor
Corporation, International Rectifier Corporation, ON Semiconductor Corporation,
Philips Electronics N.V., Rohm Electronics USA LLC, and Vishay Intertechnology,
Inc. We may not be able to compete successfully in the future, and competitive
pressures may harm our financial condition or our operating
results.
We
receive a significant portion of our net sales from a single customer. In
addition, this customer is also our largest external supplier and is a related
party. The loss of this customer or supplier could harm our business and results
of operations.
In
2005
and 2006, LSC, our largest stockholder and our largest customer, accounted
for
9.6% and 6.5%, respectively, of our net sales. LSC is also our largest supplier,
providing us with discrete semiconductor products for subsequent sale by us,
which represented approximately 14.7% and 13.0%, respectively, of our net sales,
in 2005 and 2006. The loss of LSC as either a customer or a supplier, or any
significant reduction in either the amount of product it supplies to us, or
the
volume of orders it places with us, could materially harm our business and
results of operations.
Delays
in initiation of production at new facilities, implementing new production
techniques or resolving problems associated with technical equipment
malfunctions could adversely affect our manufacturing
efficiencies.
Our
manufacturing efficiency has been and will be an important factor in our future
profitability, and we may not be able to maintain or increase our manufacturing
efficiency. Our manufacturing and testing processes are complex, require
advanced and costly equipment and are continually being modified in our efforts
to improve yields and product performance. Difficulties in the manufacturing
process can lower yields. Technical or other problems could lead to production
delays, order cancellations and lost revenue. In addition, any problems in
achieving acceptable yields, construction delays, or other problems in upgrading
or expanding existing facilities, building new facilities, problems in bringing
other new manufacturing capacity to full production or changing our process
technologies, could also result in capacity constraints, production delays
and a
loss of future revenues and customers. Our operating results also could be
adversely affected by any increase in fixed costs and operating expenses related
to increases in production capacity if net sales do not increase
proportionately, or in the event of a decline in demand for our
products.
Our
wafer
fabrication facility is located in Kansas City, Missouri, while our facilities
in Shanghai, China provide assembly, test and packaging capabilities and the
Anachip facility in Taiwan produces power management ICs. Any disruption of
operations at these facilities could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and results of operations.
We
are and will continue to be under continuous pressure from our customers and
competitors to reduce the price of our products, which could adversely affect
our growth and profit margins.
Prices
for our products tend to decrease over their life cycle. There is substantial
and continuing pressure from customers to reduce the total cost of purchasing
our products. To remain competitive and retain our customers and gain new ones,
we must continue to reduce our costs through product and manufacturing
improvements. We must also strive to minimize our customers’ shipping and
inventory financing costs and to meet their other goals for rationalization
of
supply and production. We experienced an annual decrease in average selling
prices (ASP) for our products of 3.1% and 15.0% for 2004 and 2005, respectively,
and an ASP increase of 12.1%, primarily due to newly acquired product lines,
in
2006. Our growth and the profit margins of our products will suffer if we cannot
effectively continue to reduce our costs and keep our product prices
competitive.
Our
customer orders are subject to cancellation or modification usually with no
penalty. High volumes of order cancellation or reductions in quantities ordered
could adversely affect our results of operations and financial
condition.
All
of
our customer orders are subject to cancellation or modification, usually with
no
penalty to the customer. Orders are generally made on a purchase order basis,
rather than pursuant to long-term supply contracts, and are booked from one
to
twelve months in advance of delivery. The rate of booking new orders can vary
significantly from month to month. We, and the semiconductor industry as a
whole, are experiencing a trend towards shorter lead-times, which is the amount
of time between the date a customer places an order and the date the customer
requires shipment. Furthermore, our industry is subject to rapid changes in
customer outlook and periods of excess inventory due to changes in demand in
the
end markets our industry serves. As a result, many of our purchase orders are
revised, and may be cancelled, with little or no penalty and with little or
no
notice. However, we must still commit production and other resources to
fulfilling these orders even though they may ultimately be cancelled. If a
significant number of orders are cancelled or product quantities ordered are
reduced, and we are unable to timely generate replacement orders, we may build
up excess inventory and our results of operations and financial condition may
suffer.
New
technologies could result in the development of new products by our competitors
and a decrease in demand for our products, and we may not be able to develop
new
products to satisfy changes in demand, which could result in a decrease in
net
sales and loss of market share.
Our
product range and new product development program is focused on discrete and
analog semiconductor products. Our failure to develop new technologies, or
anticipate or react to changes in existing technologies, either within or
outside of the discrete semiconductor market, could materially delay development
of new products, which could result in a decrease in our net sales and a loss
of
market share to our competitors. The semiconductor industry is characterized
by
rapidly changing technologies and industry standards, together with frequent
new
product introductions. This includes the development of new types of technology
or the improvement of existing technologies, such as analog and digital
technologies that compete with, or seek to replace discrete semiconductor
technology. Our financial performance depends on our ability to design, develop,
manufacture, assemble, test, market and support new products and product
enhancements on a timely and cost-effective basis. New products often command
higher prices and, as a result, higher profit margins. We may not successfully
identify new product opportunities or develop and bring new products to market
or succeed in selling them into new customer applications in a timely and
cost-effective manner.
Products
or technologies developed by other companies may render our products or
technologies obsolete or noncompetitive and, since we operate primarily in
a
narrower segment of the broader semiconductor industry, this may have a greater
effect on us than it would if we were a broad-line semiconductor manufacturer
with a wider range of product types and technologies. Many of our competitors
are larger and more established international companies with greater engineering
and research and development resources than us. Our failure to identify or
capitalize on any fundamental shifts in technologies in our product markets,
relative to our competitors, could harm our business, have a material adverse
effect on our competitive position within our industry and harm our
relationships with our customers. In addition, to remain competitive, we must
continue to reduce package sizes, improve manufacturing yields and expand our
sales. We may not be able to accomplish these goals, which could harm our
business.
We
may be subject to claims of infringement of third-party intellectual property
rights or demands that we license third-party technology, which could result
in
significant expense and reduction in our intellectual property
rights.
The
semiconductor industry is characterized by vigorous protection and pursuit
of
intellectual property rights. From time to time, third parties have asserted,
and may in the future assert, patent, copyright, trademark and other
intellectual property rights to technologies that are important to our business
and have demanded, and may in the future demand, that we license their patents
and technology. Any litigation to determine the validity of allegations that
our
products infringe or may infringe these rights, including claims arising through
our contractual indemnification of our customers, or claims challenging the
validity of our patents, regardless of its merit or resolution, could be costly
and divert the efforts and attention of our management and technical personnel.
We may not prevail in litigation given the complex technical issues and inherent
uncertainties in intellectual property litigation. If litigation results in
an
adverse ruling we could be required to:
Ø |
pay
substantial damages for past, present and future use of the infringing
technology;
|
Ø |
cease
the manufacture, use or sale of infringing
products;
|
Ø |
discontinue
the use of infringing technology;
|
Ø |
expend
significant resources to develop non-infringing
technology;
|
Ø |
pay
substantial damages to our customers or end-users to discontinue use or
replace infringing technology with non-infringing
technology;
|
Ø |
license
technology from the third party claiming infringement, which license
may
not be available on commercially reasonable terms, or at
all; or
|
Ø |
relinquish
intellectual property rights associated with one or more of our patent
claims, if such claims are held invalid or otherwise
unenforceable.
|
We
depend on third-party suppliers for timely deliveries of raw materials, parts
and equipment, as well as finished products from other manufacturers, and our
results of operations could be adversely affected if we are unable to obtain
adequate supplies in a timely manner.
Our
manufacturing operations depend upon obtaining adequate supplies of raw
materials, parts and equipment on a timely basis from third parties. Our results
of operations could be adversely affected if we are unable to obtain adequate
supplies of raw materials, parts and equipment in a timely manner or if the
costs of raw materials, parts or equipment were to increase significantly.
Our
business could also be adversely affected if there is a significant degradation
in the quality of raw materials used in our products, or if the raw materials
give rise to compatibility or performance issues in our products, any of which
could lead to an increase in customer returns or product warranty claims.
Although we maintain rigorous quality control systems, errors or defects may
arise from a supplied raw material and be beyond our detection or control.
Any
interruption in, or change in quality of, the supply of raw materials, parts
or
equipment needed to manufacture our products could adversely affect our business
and harm our results of operations and our reputation with our
customers.
In
addition, we sell finished products from other manufacturers. Our business
could
also be adversely affected if there is a significant degradation in the quality
of these products. From time to time, such manufacturers may extend lead-times,
limit supplies or increase prices due to capacity constraints or other factors.
We have no long-term purchase contracts with any of these manufacturers and,
therefore, have no contractual assurances of continued supply, pricing or access
to finished products that we sell, and any such manufacturer could discontinue
supplying to us at any time. Additionally, some of our suppliers of finished
products or wafers compete directly with us and may in the future choose not
to
supply products to us.
If
we do not succeed in continuing to vertically integrate our business, we will
not realize the cost and other efficiencies we anticipate and our ability to
compete, profit margins and results of operations may
suffer.
We
are
continuing to vertically integrate our business. Key elements of this strategy
include continuing to expand the reach of our sales organization, expand our
manufacturing capacity, expand our wafer foundry and research and development
capability and expand our marketing, product development, package development
and assembly/testing operations in company-owned facilities or through the
acquisition of established contractors. There are certain risks associated
with
our vertical integration strategy, including:
Ø |
difficulties
associated with owning a manufacturing business, including, but not
limited to, the maintenance and management of manufacturing facilities,
equipment, employees and inventories and limitations on the flexibility
of
controlling overhead;
|
Ø |
difficulties
in continuing expansion of our operations in Asia and Europe, because
of
the distance from our U.S. headquarters and differing regulatory and
cultural environments;
|
Ø |
the
need for skills and techniques that are outside our traditional core
expertise;
|
Ø |
less
flexibility in shifting manufacturing or supply sources from one
region to
another;
|
Ø |
even
when
independent suppliers offer lower prices, we would continue to acquire
wafers from our captive manufacturing facility, which may result
in us
having higher costs than our
competitors;
|
Ø |
difficulties
developing and implementing a successful research and development
team; and
|
Ø |
difficulties
developing, protecting, and gaining market acceptance of, our proprietary
technology.
|
The
risks
of becoming a fully integrated manufacturer are amplified in an industry-wide
slowdown because of the fixed costs associated with manufacturing facilities.
In
addition, we may not realize the cost, operating and other efficiencies that
we
expect from continued vertical integration. If we fail to successfully
vertically integrate our business, our ability to compete, profit margins and
results of operations may suffer.
Part
of our growth strategy involves identifying and acquiring companies with
complementary product lines or customers. We may be unable to identify suitable
acquisition candidates or consummate desired acquisitions and, if we do make
any
acquisitions, we may be unable to successfully integrate any acquired companies
with our operations.
A
significant part of our growth strategy involves acquiring companies with
complementary product lines, customers or other capabilities. For example,
(i)
in fiscal year 2000, we acquired FabTech, a wafer fabrication company, in order
to have our own wafer manufacturing capabilities, (ii) in January 2006, we
acquired Anachip as an entry into standard
logic markets, and (iii) in November 2006, we acquired the assets of
APD.
While
we do not currently have any agreements or commitments in place with respect
to
any material acquisitions, we are in various stages of preliminary discussions,
and we intend to continue to expand and diversify our operations by making
further acquisitions. However, we may be unsuccessful in identifying suitable
acquisition candidates, or we may be unable to consummate a desired acquisition.
To the extent we do make acquisitions, if we are unsuccessful in integrating
these companies or their operations or product lines with our operations, or
if
integration is more difficult than anticipated, we may experience disruptions
that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition
and results of operations. In addition, we may not realize all of the benefits
we anticipate from any such acquisitions. Some of the risks that may affect
our
ability to integrate or realize any anticipated benefits from acquisitions
that
we may make include those associated with:
Ø |
unexpected
losses of key employees or customers of the acquired
company;
|
Ø |
bringing
the acquired company’s standards, processes, procedures and controls into
conformance with our operations;
|
Ø |
coordinating
our new product and process
development;
|
Ø |
hiring
additional management and other critical
personnel;
|
Ø |
increasing
the scope, geographic diversity and complexity of our
operations;
|
Ø |
difficulties
in consolidating facilities and transferring processes and
know-how;
|
Ø |
difficulties
in reducing costs of the acquired entity’s
business;
|
Ø |
diversion
of management’s attention from the management of our
business; and
|
Ø |
adverse
effects on existing business relationships with
customers.
|
We
are subject to many environmental laws and regulations that could affect our
operations or result in significant expenses.
We
are
subject to a variety of U.S. federal, state, local and foreign governmental
laws, rules and regulations related to the use, storage, handling, discharge
or
disposal of certain toxic, volatile or otherwise hazardous chemicals used in
our
manufacturing process both in the United States where our wafer fabrication
facility is located, in China where our assembly, test and packaging facilities
are located, and in Taiwan where our analog products are produced. Some of
these
regulations in the United States include the Federal Clean Water Act, Clean
Air
Act, Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability Act and similar state statutes and
regulations. Any of these regulations could require us to acquire equipment
or
to incur substantial other expenses to comply with environmental regulations.
If
we were to incur such additional expenses, our product costs could significantly
increase, materially affecting our business, financial condition and results
of
operations. Any failure to comply with present or future environmental laws,
rules and regulations could result in fines, suspension of production or
cessation of operations, any of which could have a material adverse effect
on
our business, financial condition and results of operations. Our operations
affected by such requirements include, among others: the disposal of wastewater
containing residues from our manufacturing operations through publicly operated
treatment works or sewer systems, and which may be subject to volume and
chemical discharge limits and may also require discharge permits; and the use,
storage and disposal of materials that may be classified as toxic or hazardous.
Any of these may result in, or may have resulted in, environmental conditions
for which we could be liable.
Some
environmental laws impose liability, sometimes without fault, for investigating
or cleaning up contamination on, or emanating from, our currently or formerly
owned, leased or operated properties, as well as for damages to property or
natural resources and for personal injury arising out of such contamination.
Such liability may also be joint and several, meaning that we could be held
responsible for more than our share of the liability involved, or even the
entire share. In addition, the presence of environmental contamination could
also interfere with ongoing operations or adversely affect our ability to sell
or lease our properties. Environmental requirements may also limit our ability
to identify suitable sites for new or expanded plants. Discovery of
contamination for which we are responsible, the enactment of new laws and
regulations, or changes in how existing requirements are enforced, could require
us to incur additional costs for compliance or subject us to unexpected
liabilities.
Our
products may be found to be defective and, as a result, product liability claims
may be asserted against us, which may harm our business and our reputation
with
our customers.
Our
products are typically sold at prices that are significantly lower than the
cost
of the equipment or other goods in which they are incorporated. For example,
our
products that are incorporated into a personal computer may be sold for several
cents, whereas the computer maker might sell the personal computer for several
hundred dollars. Although we maintain rigorous quality control systems, we
shipped approximately 14.5 billion individual semiconductor devices in 2006
to customers around the world, and in the ordinary course of our business,
we
receive warranty claims for some of these products that are defective, or that
do not perform to published specifications. Since a defect or failure in our
products could give rise to failures in the end products that incorporate them
(and consequential claims for damages against our customers from their
customers), we may face claims for damages that are disproportionate to the
revenues and profits we receive from the products involved. In addition, our
ability to reduce such liabilities may be limited by the laws or the customary
business practices of the countries where we do business. Even in cases where
we
do not believe we have legal liability for such claims, we may choose to pay
for
them to retain a customer’s business or goodwill or to settle claims to avoid
protracted litigation. Our results of operations and business could be adversely
affected as a result of a significant quality or performance issue in our
products, if we are required or choose to pay for the damages that result.
Although we currently have product liability insurance, we may not have
sufficient insurance coverage, and we may not have sufficient resources, to
satisfy all possible product liability claims. In addition, any perception
that
our products are defective would likely result in reduced sales of our products,
loss of customers and harm to our business and reputation.
We
may fail to attract or retain the qualified technical, sales, marketing and
management personnel required to operate our business
successfully.
Our
future success depends, in part, upon our ability to attract and retain highly
qualified technical, sales, marketing and managerial personnel. Personnel with
the necessary expertise are scarce and competition for personnel with these
skills is intense. We may not be able to retain existing key technical, sales,
marketing and managerial employees or be successful in attracting, assimilating
or retaining other highly qualified technical, sales, marketing and managerial
personnel in the future. For example, we have faced, and continue to face,
intense competition for qualified technical and other personnel in Shanghai,
China, where our assembly, test and packaging facilities are located. A number
of U.S. and multi-national corporations, both in the semiconductor industry
and
in other industries, have recently established and are continuing to establish
factories and plants in Shanghai, China, and the competition for qualified
personnel has increased significantly as a result. If we are unable to retain
existing key employees or are unsuccessful in attracting new highly qualified
employees, our business, financial condition and results of operations could
be
materially and adversely affected.
We
may not be able to maintain our growth or achieve future growth and such growth
may place a strain on our management and on our systems and
resources.
Our
ability to successfully grow our business within the discrete and analog
semiconductor markets requires effective planning and management. Our past
growth, and our targeted future growth, may place a significant strain on our
management and on our systems and resources, including our financial and
managerial controls, reporting systems and procedures. In addition, we will
need
to continue to train and manage our workforce worldwide. If we are unable to
effectively plan and manage our growth effectively, our business and prospects
will be harmed and we will not be able to maintain our profit growth or achieve
future growth.
Our
business may be adversely affected by obsolete inventories as a result of
changes in demand for our products and change in life cycles of our
products.
The
life
cycles of some of our products depend heavily upon the life cycles of the end
products into which devices are designed. These types of end-market products
with short life cycles require us to manage closely our production and inventory
levels. Inventory may also become obsolete because of adverse changes in
end-market demand. We may in the future be adversely affected by obsolete or
excess inventories which may result from unanticipated changes in the estimated
total demand for our products or the estimated life cycles of the end products
into which our products are designed. In addition, some customers restrict
how
far back the date of manufacture for our products can be, and therefore some
of
our products inventory may become obsolete, and thus, adversely affect our
results of operations.
If
OEMs do not design our products into their applications, a portion of our net
sales may be adversely affected.
We
expect
an increasingly significant portion of net sales will come from products we
design specifically for our customers. However, we may be unable to achieve
these design wins. In addition, a design win from a customer does not
necessarily guarantee future sales to that customer. Without design wins from
OEMs, we would only be able to sell our products to these OEMs as a second
source, which usually means we are only able to sell a limited amount of product
to them. Once an OEM designs another supplier’s semiconductors into one of its
product platforms, it is more difficult for us to achieve future design wins
with that OEM’s product platform because changing suppliers involves significant
cost, time, effort and risk to an OEM. Achieving a design win with a customer
does not ensure that we will receive significant revenues from that customer
and
we may be unable to convert design into actual sales. Even after a design win,
the customer is not obligated to purchase our products and can choose at any
time to stop using our products, if, for example, its own products are not
commercially successful.
We
rely heavily on our internal electronic information and communications systems,
and any system outage could adversely affect our business and results of
operations.
All
of
our operations, other than FabTech and Anachip, operate on a single technology
platform. To manage our international operations efficiently and effectively,
we
rely heavily on our Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system, internal
electronic information and communications systems and on systems or support
services from third parties. Any of these systems are subject to electrical
or
telecommunications outages, computer hacking or other general system failure.
Difficulties in upgrading or expanding our ERP system or system-wide or local
failures that affect our information processing could have material adverse
effects on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows.
We
are subject to interest rate risk that could have an adverse effect on our
cost
of working capital and interest expenses.
We
have
credit facilities with U.S. and Asian financial institutions, as well as other
debt instruments, with interest rates equal to LIBOR or similar indices plus
a
negotiated margin. A rise in interest rates could have an adverse impact upon
our cost of working capital and our interest expense. As of December 31,
2006, our outstanding interest-bearing debt was $239.9 million. An increase
of
1.0% in interest rates would increase our annual interest rate expense by
approximately $99,000 (our $230 million in convertible notes have a 2.25% fixed
interest rate).
We
had a significant amount of debt following the offering of convertible notes.
Our substantial indebtedness could adversely affect our business, financial
condition and results of operations and our ability to meet our payment
obligations under the notes and or other debt.
Following
the offering of convertible notes in October 2006, we had a significant amount
of debt and substantial debt service requirements. As of December 31, 2006,
we
had $239.9 million of outstanding debt, including $230 million senior
convertible notes. In addition, $50.9 million is available for future borrowings
under our principal U.S. credit facility, and we are permitted under the terms
of our debt agreements to incur substantial additional debt.
This
level of debt could have significant consequences on our future operations,
including:
Ø |
making
it more difficult for us to meet our payment and other obligations
under
the notes and our other outstanding
debt;
|
Ø |
resulting
in an event of default if we fail to comply with the financial and
other
restrictive covenants contained in our debt agreements, which event
of
default could result in all of our debt becoming immediately due
and
payable and, in the case of an event of default under our secured
debt,
such as our senior secured credit facility, could permit the lenders
to
foreclose on our assets securing that
debt;
|
Ø |
reducing
the availability of our cash flow to fund working capital, capital
expenditures, acquisitions and other general corporate purposes,
and
limiting our ability to obtain additional financing for these
purposes;
|
Ø |
subjecting
us to the risk of increased sensitivity to interest rate increases
on our
indebtedness with variable interest rates, including borrowings under
senior secured credit facility;
|
Ø |
limiting
our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, and increasing our
vulnerability to, changes in our business, the industry in which
we
operate and the general economy; and
|
Ø |
placing
us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors that
have
less debt or are less leveraged.
|
Any
of
the above-listed factors could have an adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and results of operations and our ability to meet our payment
obligations under the notes and our other debt.
If
we fail to maintain an effective system of internal controls or discover
material weaknesses in our internal controls over financial reporting, we may
not be able to report our financial results accurately or detect fraud, which
could harm our business and the trading price of our Common
Stock.
Effective
internal controls are necessary for us to produce reliable financial reports
and
are important in our effort to prevent financial fraud. We are required to
periodically evaluate the effectiveness of the design and operation of our
internal controls. These evaluations may result in the conclusion that
enhancements, modifications or changes to our internal controls are necessary
or
desirable. While management evaluates the effectiveness of our internal controls
on a regular basis, these controls may not always be effective. There are
inherent limitations on the effectiveness of internal controls including
collusion, management override, and failure of human judgment. Because of this,
control procedures are designed to reduce rather than eliminate business risks.
If we fail to maintain an effective system of internal controls or if management
or our independent registered public accounting firm were to discover material
weaknesses in our internal controls, we may be unable to produce reliable
financial reports or prevent fraud and it could harm our financial condition
and
results of operations and result in loss of investor confidence and a decline
in
our stock price.
Terrorist
attacks, or threats or occurrences of other terrorist activities whether in
the
United States or internationally may affect the markets in which our Common
Stock trades, the markets in which we operate and our
profitability.
Terrorist
attacks, or threats or occurrences of other terrorist or related activities,
whether in the United States or internationally, may affect the markets in
which
our Common Stock trades, the markets in which we operate and our profitability.
Future terrorist or related activities could affect our domestic and
international sales, disrupt our supply chains and impair our ability to produce
and deliver our products. Such activities could affect our physical facilities
or those of our suppliers or customers. Such terrorist attacks could cause
ports
or airports to or through which we ship to be shut down, thereby preventing
the
delivery of raw materials and finished goods to or from our manufacturing
facilities in Shanghai, China, Taiwan or Kansas City, Missouri, or to our
regional sales offices. Due to the broad and uncertain effects that terrorist
attacks have had on financial and economic markets generally, we cannot provide
any estimate of how these activities might affect our future
results.
RISKS
RELATED TO OUR INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS
Our
international
operations subject us to risks that could adversely affect our
operations.
We
expect
net sales from foreign markets to continue to represent a significant portion
of
our total net sales. In addition, the majority of our manufacturing facilities
are located overseas in China. In 2005 and 2006, net sales to customers outside
the United States represented 74.4% and 77.8%, respectively, of our net sales.
There are risks inherent in doing business internationally, and any or all
of
the following factors could cause harm to our business:
Ø |
changes
in, or impositions of, legislative or regulatory requirements, including
tax laws in the United States and in the countries in which we manufacture
or sell our products;
|
Ø |
compliance
with trade or other laws in a variety of
jurisdictions;
|
Ø |
trade
restrictions, transportation delays, work stoppages, and economic
and
political instability;
|
Ø |
changes
in import/export regulations, tariffs and freight
rates;
|
Ø |
difficulties
in collecting receivables and enforcing
contracts;
|
Ø |
currency
exchange rate fluctuations;
|
Ø |
restrictions
on the transfer of funds from foreign subsidiaries to the United
States;
|
Ø |
the
possibility of international conflict, particularly between or among
China
and Taiwan and the United States;
|
Ø |
legal
regulatory, political and cultural differences among the countries
in
which we do business;
|
Ø |
longer
customer payment terms; and
|
Ø |
changes
in U.S. or foreign tax regulations.
|
We
have significant operations and assets in China, Taiwan and Hong Kong and,
as a
result, will be subject to risks inherent in doing business in those
jurisdictions, which may adversely affect our financial
performance.
We
have a
significant portion of our assets in mainland China, Taiwan and Hong Kong.
Our
ability to operate in China, Taiwan and Hong Kong may be adversely affected
by
changes in those jurisdictions’ laws and regulations, including those relating
to taxation, import and export tariffs, environmental regulations, land use
rights, property and other matters. In addition, our results of operations
in
China, Taiwan and Hong Kong are subject to the economic and political situation
there. We believe that our operations in China, Taiwan and Hong Kong are in
compliance with all applicable legal and regulatory requirements. However,
the
central or local governments of these jurisdictions may impose new, stricter
regulations or interpretations of existing regulations that would require
additional expenditures and efforts on our part to ensure our compliance with
such regulations or interpretations.
Changes
in the political environment or government policies in those jurisdictions
could
result in revisions to laws or regulations or their interpretation and
enforcement, increased taxation, restrictions on imports, import duties or
currency revaluations. In addition, a significant destabilization of relations
between or among China, Taiwan or Hong Kong and the United States could result
in restrictions or prohibitions on our operations or the sale of our products
or
the forfeiture of our assets in these jurisdictions. There can be no certainty
as to the application of the laws and regulations of these jurisdictions in
particular instances. Enforcement of existing laws or agreements may be sporadic
and implementation and interpretation of laws inconsistent. Moreover, there
is a
high degree of fragmentation among regulatory authorities, resulting in
uncertainties as to which authorities have jurisdiction over particular parties
or transactions. The possibility of political conflict between these countries
or with the United States could have an adverse impact upon our ability to
transact business in these jurisdictions and to generate profits.
We
are subject to foreign currency risk as a result of our international
operations.
We
face
exposure to adverse movements in foreign currency exchange rates, primarily
Asian currencies and, to a lesser extent, the Euro. For example, many of our
employees who are located in China, are paid in the Chinese Yuan and,
accordingly, an increase in the value of the Yuan compared to the
U.S. dollar could increase our operating expenses. In addition, we sell our
products in various currencies and, accordingly, a decline in the value of
any
such currency against the U.S. dollar, which is our primary functional
currency, could create a decrease in our net sales. Our foreign currency risk
may change over time as the level of activity in foreign markets grows and
could
have an adverse impact upon our financial results. These currencies are
principally the Chinese Yuan, the Taiwanese dollar, the Japanese Yen, the Euro
and the Hong Kong dollar. The Chinese government has recently taken action
to
permit the Yuan to U.S. dollar exchange rate to fluctuate, which may
exacerbate our exposure to foreign currency risk and harm our results of
operations. We do not usually employ hedging techniques designed to mitigate
foreign currency exposures and, therefore, we could experience currency losses
as these currencies fluctuate against the U.S. dollar.
We
may not continue to receive preferential tax treatment in Asia, thereby
increasing our income tax expense and reducing our net
income.
As
an
incentive for establishing our manufacturing subsidiaries in China, we receive
preferential tax treatment. In addition, in conjunction with the acquisition
of
Anachip, we also receive preferential tax treatment in Taiwan. Governmental
changes in foreign tax law may cause us not to be able
to
continue receiving these preferential tax treatments in the future, which may
cause an increase in our income tax expense, thereby reducing our net
income.
The
distribution
of any earnings of our foreign subsidiaries to the United States may be subject
to U.S. income taxes, thus reducing our net
income.
We
are
currently planning, and may in the future plan, to distribute earnings of our
foreign subsidiaries from Asia to the United States. We may be required to
pay
U.S. income taxes on these earnings to the extent we have not previously
recorded deferred U.S. taxes on such earnings. Any such taxes would reduce
our net income in the period in which these earnings are
distributed.
On
October 22, 2004, the American Jobs Creation Act, or AJCA, was signed into
law. Among other items, the AJCA establishes a phased repeal of the
extraterritorial income exclusion, a new incentive tax deduction for
U.S. corporations to repatriate cash from foreign subsidiaries equal to 85%
of cash dividends received in the year elected that exceeds a base-period
amount, and significantly revises the taxation of U.S. companies doing
business abroad.
At
December 31, 2004, we made a minimum estimate for repatriating cash from our
subsidiaries in China and Hong Kong of $8.0 million under the AJCA, and recorded
an income tax expense of approximately $1.3 million. Under the guidelines of
the
AJCA, we developed a required domestic reinvestment plan, covering items such
as
U.S. bank debt repayment, U.S. capital expenditures and U.S. research and
development activities, among others, to cover the dividend repatriation. During
2005, we completed a quantitative analysis of the benefits of the AJCA, the
foreign tax credit implications, and state and local tax consequences of the
impact of the AJCA on our plans for repatriation. Based on the analysis, we
repatriated $24.0 million from our foreign subsidiaries in 2005.
We
are
evaluating the need to provide additional deferred taxes for the future earnings
of our foreign subsidiaries to the extent such earnings may be appropriated
for
distribution to our corporate offices in North America, and as further
investment strategies with respect to foreign earnings are determined. The
distribution of any unappropriated funds from our foreign subsidiaries to the
U.S. will require the recording of income tax provisions on the U.S. entity,
thus reducing net income. As of December 31, 2006, we have recorded
approximately $3.3 million in deferred taxes for earnings of our foreign
subsidiaries.
RISKS
RELATED TO OUR COMMON STOCK
Variations
in our quarterly operating results may cause our stock price to be
volatile.
We
may
experience substantial variations in net sales, gross profit margin and
operating results from quarter to quarter. We believe that the factors that
influence this variability of quarterly results include:
Ø |
general
economic conditions in the countries where we sell our
products;
|
Ø |
seasonality
and variability in the computing and communications market and our
other
end-markets;
|
Ø |
the
timing of our and our competitors’ new product
introductions;
|
Ø |
the
scheduling, rescheduling and cancellation of large orders by our
customers;
|
Ø |
the
cyclical nature of demand for our customers’
products;
|
Ø |
our
ability to develop new process technologies and achieve volume production
at our fabrication facilities;
|
Ø |
changes
in manufacturing yields;
|
Ø |
changes
in gross
profit margins due to the Anachip or APD
acquisitions;
|
Ø |
adverse
movements in exchange rates, interest rates or tax
rates; and
|
Ø |
the
availability of adequate supply commitments from our outside suppliers
or
subcontractors.
|
Accordingly,
a comparison of our results of operations from period to period is not
necessarily meaningful to investors and our results of operations for any period
do not necessarily indicate future performance. Variations in our quarterly
results may trigger volatile changes in our stock price.
We
may enter into future acquisitions and take certain actions in connection with
such acquisitions that could affect the price of our Common
Stock.
As
part
of our growth strategy, we expect to review acquisition prospects that would
implement our vertical integration strategy or offer other growth opportunities.
While we do not currently have any agreements or commitments in place with
respect to any material acquisitions, we are in various stages of preliminary
discussions, and we may acquire businesses, products or technologies in the
future. In the event of future acquisitions, we could:
Ø |
use
a significant portion of our available
cash;
|
Ø |
issue
equity securities, which would dilute current stockholders’ percentage
ownership;
|
Ø |
incur
substantial debt;
|
Ø |
incur
or assume contingent liabilities, known or
unknown;
|
Ø |
incur
amortization expenses related to
intangibles; and
|
Ø |
incur
large, immediate accounting
write-offs.
|
Such
actions by us could harm our results from operations and adversely affect the
price of our Common Stock.
Our
directors, executive officers and significant stockholders hold a substantial
portion of our Common Stock, which may lead to conflicts with other stockholders
over corporate transactions and other corporate
matters.
Our
directors, executive officers and our affiliate, LSC, beneficially own
approximately 29.7% of our outstanding Common Stock, including options to
purchase shares of our Common Stock that are exercisable within 60 days of
December 31, 2006. These stockholders, acting together, will be able to
influence significantly all matters requiring stockholder approval, including
the election of directors and significant corporate transactions such as mergers
or other business combinations. This control may delay, deter or prevent a
third
party from acquiring or merging with us, which could adversely affect the market
price of our Common Stock.
LSC,
our
largest stockholder, owns approximately 22.3% (5.8 million shares) of our Common
Stock. Some of our directors and executive officers may have potential conflicts
of interest because of their positions with LSC or their ownership of LSC Common
Stock. Some of our directors are LSC directors and officers, and our
non-employee Chairman of our Board of Directors is Chairman of the board of
LSC.
Several of our directors and executive officers own LSC Common Stock and hold
options to purchase LSC Common Stock. Service on our Board of Directors and
as a
director or officer of LSC, or ownership of LSC Common Stock by our directors
and executive officers, could create, or appear to create, actual or potential
conflicts of interest when directors and officers are faced with decisions
that
could have different implications for LSC and us. For example, potential
conflicts could arise in connection with decisions involving the Common Stock
owned by LSC, or under the other agreements we may enter into with LSC. LSC
was
our largest external supplier of discrete semiconductor products for subsequent
sale by us. In 2005 and 2006, approximately 14.7% and 13.0%, respectively,
of
our net sales were from products manufactured by LSC. In addition to being
our
largest external supplier of finished products in each of these periods, we
sold
silicon wafers to LSC totaling 9.6% and 6.5%, respectively, of our net sales
during such periods, making LSC our largest customer.
We
may
have difficulty resolving any potential conflicts of interest with LSC, and
even
if we do, the resolution may be less favorable than if we were dealing with
an
entirely unrelated third party.
We
were formed in 1959, and our early corporate records are incomplete. As a
result, we may have difficulty in assessing and defending against claims
relating to rights to our Common Stock purporting to arise during periods for
which our records are incomplete.
We
were
formed in 1959 under the laws of California and reincorporated in Delaware
in
1969. We have had several transfer agents over the past 47 years. In
addition, our early corporate records, including our stock ledger, are
incomplete. As a result, we may have difficulty in assessing and defending
against claims relating to rights to our Common Stock purporting to arise during
periods for which our records are incomplete.
Conversion
of our convertible senior notes will dilute the ownership interest of existing
stockholders, including holders who had previously converted their
notes.
To
the
extent we issue Common Stock upon conversion of the notes, the conversion of
some or all of the notes will dilute the ownership interests of existing
stockholders, including holders who have received Common Stock upon prior
conversion of the notes. Any sales in the public market of the Common Stock
issuable upon such conversion could adversely affect prevailing market prices
of
our Common Stock. In addition, the existence of the notes may encourage short
selling by market participants because the conversion of the notes could depress
the price of our Common Stock.
The
repurchase rights and the increased conversion rate triggered by a make-whole
fundamental change could discourage a potential
acquirer.
If
a
“fundamental change” in accordance with the terms of the senior convertible
notes were to occur, the holders of the notes have the right to require us
to
repurchase the notes. A fundamental change would include a change in control
of
the Company. In addition, if a make-whole fundamental change were to occur,
which may include an acquisition of the Company, the conversion rate for the
senior convertible notes will increase. The repurchase rights in our senior
convertible notes triggered by a fundamental change and the increased conversion
rate triggered by a make-whole fundamental change could discourage a potential
acquirer.
Anti-takeover
effects of certain provisions of Delaware law and our Certificate of
Incorporation and By-laws.
Some
provisions of Delaware law, our certificate of incorporation and by-laws may
be
deemed to have an anti-takeover effect and may delay or prevent a tender offer
to takeover attempt that a stockholder might consider in its best interest,
including those attempts that might result in a premium over the market price
for the shares held by stockholders.
Section 203
of Delaware General Corporation Law
Section 203
of the Delaware General Corporation Law prohibits transactions between a
Delaware corporation and an “interested stockholder,” which is defined as a
person who, together with any affiliates or associates, beneficially owns,
directly or indirectly, 15.0% or more of the outstanding voting shares of a
Delaware corporation. This provision prohibits certain business combinations
between an interested stockholder and a Delaware corporation for a period of
three years after the date the stockholder becomes an interested stockholder,
unless:
(i)
either the business combination or the transaction which resulted in the
stockholder becoming an interested stockholder is approved by the corporation’s
board of directors prior to the date the interested stockholder becomes an
interested stockholder;
(ii)
the
interested stockholder acquired at least 85.0% of the voting stock of the
corporation (other than stock held by directors who are also officers or be
certain employee stock plans) in the transaction in which the stockholder became
an interested stockholder; or
(iii)
the
business combination is approved by a majority of the board of directors and
by
the affirmative vote of 66.66% of the outstanding voting stock that is not
owned
by the interested stockholder.
For
this
purpose, business combinations include mergers, consolidations, sales or other
dispositions of assets having an aggregate value in excess of 10.0% of the
aggregate market value of the consolidated assets or outstanding stock of the
corporation, and certain transactions that would increase the interested
stockholder’s proportionate share ownership in the corporation.
Certificate
of Incorporation and Bylaw Provisions
Provisions
of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws may have the effect of making
it
more difficult for a third party to acquire control of our company. In
particular, our bylaws authorize our Board of Directors to issue, without
further action by the stockholders, up to 1,000,000 shares of undesignated
preferred stock with rights and preferences, including voting rights,
designated
from time to time by the board of directors. The existence of authorized but
unissued shares of preferred stock enables our board of directors to render
more
difficult or to discourage an attempt to obtain control of us by means of a
merger, tender offer, proxy contest or otherwise.
Item
1B. Unresolved
Staff Comments
None
Item
2. Properties
Our
primary physical properties at December 31, 2006, were as follows:
Use
|
Address
|
Owned
/
Leased
Expiration
|
Approximate
size
(sq.
ft.)
|
Approximate
Rental
/ Mo
|
|
|
|
|
|
Headquarters
and
distribution
center
|
3050
East Hillcrest Drive, Suite 200,
Westlake
Village, California, USA 91362
|
Leased
Dec,
2009
|
31,000
|
$
29,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
office, R&D center
|
780
Montague Express Way, Suite 201,
San
Jose, CA 95131
|
Leased
Jan,
2010
|
4,000
|
$
5,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
R&D
center
|
15660
N. Dallas Parkway, Suite 850,
Dallas,
TX 75248
|
Leased
Dec,
2011
|
6,000
|
$
8,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
office
|
One
Overlook Drive, Suite 8, Amherst, NH 03031
|
Leased
Monthly
|
*
|
*
|
Sales
office
|
160-D
Ease Wend, Lemont, IL 60439
|
Leased
Monthly
|
*
|
*
|
Sales
office
|
18430
Brookhurst Street, Suite 201A,
Fountain
Valley, CA 92708
|
Leased
Monthly
|
*
|
*
|
Sales
office
|
199
Route 13, Brookline, NH 03033
|
Leased
Monthly
|
*
|
*
|
Sales
office
|
22
Avenue Paul Sejourne F-31000
Toulouse,
France
|
Leased
Monthly
|
*
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing
facility
|
777
N. Blue Parkway Suite 350, Lee's
Summit,
MO 64086
|
Leased
Jun,
2013
|
70,000
|
$
117,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warehouse
|
2nd
Flr, 501-15, Chung-Cheng, Hsin-Tien City,
Taipei,
Taiwan, ROC
|
Owned
|
5,000
|
-
|
Warehouse
|
5th
Flr, 501-16, Chung-Cheng, Hsin-Tien City,
Taipei,
Taiwan, ROC
|
Owned
|
7,000
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
office
|
7F,
No. 50, Min-Quan Road, Hsin-Tien City,
Taipei,
Taiwan
|
Owned
|
11,000
|
-
|
Administrative
offices
|
5F,
No.52, Min-Quan Road, Hsin-Tien City,
Taipei,
Taiwan
|
Owned
|
12,000
|
-
|
Administrative
offices
|
7F,
No. 52, Min-Quan Road, Hsin-Tien City,
Taipei,
Taiwan
|
Owned
|
12,000
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
Continued
|
Properties
continued
|
|
|
|
|
Use
|
Address
|
Owned
/
Leased
Expiration
|
Approximate
size
(sq.
ft.)
|
Approximate
Rental
/ Mo
|
Warehouse
|
Room
B, 3F, Chuan Hing Building, No. 14
Wang
Tai Road, Kowloon Bay,
|
Leased
May,
2008
|
10,000
|
$
9,000
|
|
Hong
Kong
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing
facility
|
2F,
24-2 Gongyedong 4th Road, Hsinchu S
cience
Park, Hsin Chu 230077, Taiwan ROC
|
Leased
Jul,
2007
|
31,000
|
$
20,000
|
Manufacturing
facility
|
5F,
No. 2 Gongyedong 4th Road, Hsinchu
Science
Park, Hsin Chu 230077, Taiwan ROC
|
Leased
Jul,
2007
|
19,000
|
$
12,000
|
Office
|
F
Room, 15F,No.30 Chung Cheng 2nd Road,
Kaoshung
City
|
Leased
Dec,
2007
|
1,000
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing
facility,
products
distribution
|
999
ChenChun Road, Xinqiao Town,
SonJiang
County, Shanghai, China
|
Leased
Jan,
2017
|
145,000
|
$
67,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing
facility, products distribution
|
1F,
18 Lane, SanZhuang Road, SongJiang
export
zone, Shanghai, China
|
Leased
Jun,
2009
|
112,000
|
$
37,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shanghai
sales office
|
Room
606, No. 1158, Changning Road,
Shanghai,
China
|
Leased
Aug,
2008
|
4,000
|
$
4,300
|
ShenZhen
sales office
|
Room
A1103-04, Anlian Plaza # 2222,
Jintian
Road, Futian CBD, ShenZhen, China
|
Leased
Apr,
2012
|
5,000
|
$
6,000
|
*
Size is
less than 1,000 square feet and/or monthly rental is less than
$1,000.
We
believe our current facilities are adequate for the foreseeable future. See
“Property, Plant and Equipment” and “Commitments
and Contingencies” in “Notes
to
Consolidated Financial Statements.”
Item
3. Legal
Proceedings
We
are,
from time to time, involved in litigation incidental to the conduct of our
business. We do not believe we are currently a party to any material pending
litigation.
Item
4. Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
No
matter
was submitted by us to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter
of
2006.
PART
II
Item
5.
|
|
Market
for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer
Purchases of Equity
Securities
|
Our
Common Stock is traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market ("NasdaqGS") under
the
symbol "DIOD." Until June 19, 2000, our Common Stock was traded on the American
Stock Exchange (“AMEX”) under the symbol "DIO." In July 2000, November 2003, and
December 2005, we effected 50% stock dividends in the form of three-for-two
stock splits. The following table shows the range of high and low closing sales
prices per share, adjusted for the three-for-two stock splits, for our Common
Stock for each fiscal quarter from January 1, 2005 as reported by
Nasdaq.
Calendar
Quarter
Ended
|
|
Closing
Sales Price of
Common
Stock
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
First
quarter (through February 26, 2007)
|
|
$
|
40.41
|
|
$
|
32.83
|
|
Fourth
quarter 2006
|
|
|
45.35
|
|
|
35.48
|
|
Third
quarter 2006
|
|
|
45.99
|
|
|
32.56
|
|
Second
quarter 2006
|
|
|
43.62
|
|
|
32.54
|
|
First
quarter 2006
|
|
|
41.50
|
|
|
32.46
|
|
Fourth
quarter 2005
|
|
|
34.94
|
|
|
23.09
|
|
Third
quarter 2005
|
|
|
25.93
|
|
|
20.63
|
|
Second
quarter 2005
|
|
|
22.34
|
|
|
16.79
|
|
First
quarter 2005
|
|
|
18.31
|
|
|
13.05
|
|
On
February 26, 2007, the closing sales price of our Common Stock as reported
by
NasdaqGS was $39.37,
and there
were approximately 600 holders of record of our Common Stock.
We
have
never declared or paid cash dividends on our Common Stock. Our
credit agreement permits us to pay dividends to our stockholders to the extent
that any such dividends declared or paid in any fiscal year do not exceed an
amount equal to 50% of our net profit after taxes for such fiscal year. The
payment of dividends is within the discretion of our Board of Directors, and
will depend upon, among other things, our earnings, financial condition, capital
requirements, and general business conditions. There have been no stock
repurchases in our history.
Performance
Graph
Set
forth
below is a line graph comparing the yearly percentage change in the cumulative
total stockholder return of our Common Stock against the cumulative total return
of the Nasdaq Composite and the Nasdaq Industrial Index for the five calendar
years ending December 31, 2006. The graph is not necessarily indicative of
future price performance.
The
graph shall not be deemed incorporated by reference by any general statement
incorporating by reference this Annual Report iinto any filing under the
Securities Act of 1933 or under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except
to
the extent that the Company specifically incorporates this information by
reference, and shall not otherwise be deemed filed under such
Acts.
Source:
CTA Integrated Communications. Data from ReutersBRIDGE Data
Networks
The
graph
assumes $100 invested on December 31, 2001 in our Common Stock, the stock of
the
companies in the Nasdaq Composite Index and the Nasdaq Industrial Index, and
that all dividends received within a quarter, if any, were reinvested in that
quarter.
Item
6. Selected
Financial Data
The
following selected consolidated financial data for the fiscal years ended
December 31, 2002 through 2006 is qualified in its entirety by, and should
be
read in conjunction with, the other information and consolidated financial
statements, including the notes thereto, appearing elsewhere herein.
Certain
amounts as presented in the accompanying consolidated financial statements
have
been reclassified to conform to 2006 financial statement presentation. These
reclassifications had no impact on previously reported net income or
stockholders' equity.
(In
thousands, except per share data)
|
|
Year
Ended December 31,
|
|
Income
Statement Data
|
|
2002
|
|
2003
|
|
2004
|
|
2005
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
sales
|
|
$
|
115,821
|
|
$
|
136,905
|
|
$
|
185,703
|
|
$
|
214,765
|
|
$
|
343,308
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
profit
|
|
|
26,710
|
|
|
36,528
|
|
|
60,735
|
|
|
74,377
|
|
|
113,892
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
16,228
|
|
|
19,586
|
|
|
23,503
|
|
|
30,285
|
|
|
47,945
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research
and development expenses
|
|
|
1,472
|
|
|
2,049
|
|
|
3,422
|
|
|
3,713
|
|
|
8,317
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
(gain) on sales and impairment of fixed assets
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
1,037
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
(102
|
)
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
from operations
|
|
|
8,967
|
|
|
13,856
|
|
|
33,796
|
|
|
40,481
|
|
|
57,478
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
income (expense), net
|
|
|
(1,183
|
)
|
|
(860
|
)
|
|
(637
|
)
|
|
221
|
|
|
5,117
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
income (expense)
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
(418
|
)
|
|
406
|
|
|
(1,474
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
before taxes and minority interest
|
|
|
7,851
|
|
|
12,991
|
|
|
32,741
|
|
|
41,108
|
|
|
61,121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
tax provision
|
|
|
1,729
|
|
|
2,460
|
|
|
6,514
|
|
|
6,685
|
|
|
11,689
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority
interest in joint venture
|
|
|
(320
|
)
|
|
(436
|
)
|
|
(676
|
)
|
|
(1,094
|
)
|
|
(1,289
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income
|
|
|
5,802
|
|
|
10,095
|
|
|
25,551
|
|
|
33,329
|
|
|
48,143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings
per share: (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
$
|
0.53
|
|
$
|
1.27
|
|
$
|
1.44
|
|
$
|
1.88
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
$
|
0.47
|
|
$
|
1.10
|
|
$
|
1.29
|
|
$
|
1.74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
of shares used in computation (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
18,415
|
|
|
19,096
|
|
|
20,106
|
|
|
23,168
|
|
|
25,628
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
19,946
|
|
|
21,609
|
|
|
23,207
|
|
|
25,894
|
|
|
27,668
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As
of December 31,
|
|
Balance
Sheet Data
|
|
2002
|
|
2003
|
|
2004
|
|
2005
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
assets
|
|
$
|
105,010
|
|
$
|
123,795
|
|
$
|
167,801
|
|
$
|
289,515
|
|
$
|
622,139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working
capital
|
|
|
20,831
|
|
|
27,154
|
|
|
49,571
|
|
|
146,651
|
|
|
395,354
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term
debt
|
|
|
18,417
|
|
|
12,583
|
|
|
11,347
|
|
|
9,486
|
|
|
239,917
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders'
equity
|
|
|
57,678
|
|
|
71,450
|
|
|
112,148
|
|
|
225,474
|
|
|
294,167
|
|
(1)
Adjusted
for the effect of 3-for-2 stock splits in July 2000, November 2003, and December
2005.
2006
data
includes $5.3 million, or $0.15 per diluted share, of non-cash, stock option
compensation expense as per SFAS No. 123R.
Item
7. Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
The
following discussion of the Company’s financial condition and results of
operations should be read together with the consolidated financial statements
and the notes to consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this
Form 10-K.
The
following discussion contains forward-looking statements and information
relating to our Company. We generally identify forward-looking statements by
the
use of terminology such as “may,” “will,” “could,” “should,” “potential,”
“continue,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “believe,”
“project,” or similar phrases or the negatives of such terms. We base these
statements on our beliefs as well as assumptions we made using information
currently available to us. Such statements are subject to risks, uncertainties
and assumptions, including those identified in "Item 1A. Risk Factors,” as well
as other matters not yet known to us or not currently considered material by
us.
Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should
underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially
from
those anticipated, estimated or projected. Given these risks and uncertainties,
prospective investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such
forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements do not guarantee future
performance and should not be considered as statements of
fact.
You
should not unduly rely on these forward-looking statements, which speak only
as
of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Unless required by law, we
undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking
statements to reflect new information or future events or otherwise. The Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the “Act”) provides certain “safe
harbor” provisions for forward-looking statements. All forward-looking
statements made on this Annual Report on Form 10-K are made pursuant to the
Act.
Overview
We
are
global supplier of low pin-count standard semiconductor products. These products
have 8 pins or less and include small signal transistors, MOSFETs, thyristor
surge protection devices, transient voltage protection devices, Hall sensors,
power management products, programmable logic arrays, diodes, recitifiers,
bridges, and silicon wafer. We design, manufacture and market discrete
semiconductors focused on diverse end-use applications in the consumer
electronics, computing, industrial, communications and automotive sectors.
Semiconductors, which provide electronic signal amplification and switching
functions, are basic building-block electronic components that are incorporated
into almost every electronic device. We believe that our product focus provides
us with a meaningful competitive advantage relative to broad line semiconductor
companies that provide a wider range of semiconductor
products.
We
are
headquartered in Westlake Village, California, near Los Angeles. We have two
manufacturing facilities located in Shanghai, China, one manufacturing facility
located in Taipei, Taiwan and a wafer fabrication facility in Kansas City,
Missouri; and our sales and marketing and logistical centers are located in
Taipei, Taiwan; Shanghai and Shenzhen, China; and Hong Kong. We also have
regional sales offices or representatives in: Derbyshire, England; Toulouse,
France; Frankfurt, Germany; and various cities in the United
States.
In
1998,
we began to transform our business from the distribution of discrete
semiconductors manufactured by others to the design, manufacture and marketing
of discrete semiconductor products using our internal manufacturing
capabilities. The key elements of our strategy of transforming our business
from
a distribution-based model to one primarily based on the design and manufacture
of proprietary products are:
Ø |
expanding
our manufacturing capacity, including establishing integrated
state-of-the-art packaging and testing facilities in Asia, in 1998
and
2004, and acquiring a wafer foundry in the United States in
2000.
|
Ø |
expanding
our sales and marketing organization in Asia in order to address
the shift
of manufacturing of electronics products from the United States to
Asia.
|
Ø |
establishing
our sales and marketing organization in Europe commencing in
2002.
|
Ø |
expanding
the number of our field application engineers to design our products
into
specific end-user applications.
|
In
implementing this strategy, the following factors have affected, and, we
believe, will continue to affect, our results of operations:
Ø |
Since
1998, we have experienced increases in the demand for our products,
and
substantial pressure from our customers and competitors to reduce
the
selling price of our products. We expect future increases in net
income to
result primarily from increases in sales volume and improvements
in
product mix in order to offset reduced average selling prices of
our
products.
|
Ø |
In
2005 and 2006, 15.3% and 27.3%, respectively, of our net sales were
derived from products introduced within the last three years, which
we
term “new products,” compared to 14.3% in 2004. New products generally
have gross profit margins that are significantly higher than
the margins of our standard products. We expect net sales derived
from new
products to increase in absolute terms, although our net sales of
new
products as a percentage of our net sales will depend on the demand
for
our standard products, as well as our product
mix.
|
Ø |
Our
gross profit margin was 33.2% in 2006, compared to 34.6% in 2005
and 32.7%
in 2004. Our gross profit margin decrease in 2006 was due to the
lower
gross margin (approximately 25%) related to the acquisition of the
analog
product line. We will continue to move the analog product to our
China
manufacturing facilities to increase the gross margin on this product
line. Future gross profit margins will depend primarily on our product
mix, cost savings, and the demand for our
products.
|
Ø |
As
of December 31, 2006, we had invested approximately
$127.2 million in our Asian manufacturing facilities. During 2006, we
invested approximately $33.6 million in our Asian manufacturing
facilities and we expect to continue to invest in our manufacturing
facilities, although the amount to be invested will depend on product
demand and new product
developments.
|
Ø |
During
2006, the percentage of our net sales derived from our Asian subsidiaries
was 71.9%,
compared to 65.4% in 2005 and 55.5% in 2004. We expect our net sales
to
the Asian market to continue to increase as a percentage of our total
net
sales for 2007 and beyond as a result of the continuing shift of
the
manufacture of electronic products from the United States to
Asia.
|
Ø |
We
have increased our investment in research and development from
$3.7 million in 2005 to $8.3 million in 2006. We continue to
seek to hire qualified engineers who fit our focus on proprietary
semiconductor processes and packaging technologies. Our goal is to
expand
research and development expenses to approximately 2-3% of net sales,
which will enable us to bring additional proprietary devices to the
market.
|
During
2005, we sold 2,125,000 shares of our Common Stock in a follow-on public
offering, raising approximately $71.7 million (net of commissions and expenses).
We used approximately $31 million of the net proceeds in connection with the
Anachip acquisition and we
intend
to use the remaining net proceeds from this offering for working capital and
other general corporate purposes, including acquisitions.
On
October 12, 2006, we issued and sold convertible senior notes with an aggregate
principal amount of $230 million due 2026 (“Notes”), which pay 2.25% interest
per annum on the principal amount of the Notes, payable semi-annually in arrears
on April 1 and October 1 of each year, beginning on April 1, 2007. The
Notes
will be convertible into cash or, at our option, cash and shares of our Common
Stock based on an initial conversion rate, subject to adjustment, of 17.0946
shares per $1,000 principal amount of Notes (which represents an initial
conversion price of $58.50 per share), in certain circumstances. In addition,
following a “make-whole fundamental change” that occurs prior to October 1,
2011, we will, at our option, increase the conversion rate for a holder who
elects to convert its Notes in connection with such “make-whole fundamental
change,” in certain circumstances. We intend to use the net proceeds for working
capital and general corporate purposes, which may include the acquisition of
businesses, products, product rights or technologies, strategic investments,
or
additional purchases of Common Stock.
As
part
of our growth strategy, in December 2005, we announced the acquisition of
Anachip, a fabless Taiwanese semiconductor company focused on analog ICs
designed for specific applications. The acquisition, which closed on January
10,
2006, fits in the center of our long-term strategy. Anachip’s main product focus
is Power Management ICs. The analog devices they produce are used in LCD
monitor/TVs, wireless LAN 802.11 access points, brushless DC motor fans,
portable DVD players, datacom devices, ADSL modems, TV/satellite set-top boxes,
and power supplies. Anachip brings a design team with strong capabilities in
a
range of targeted analog and power management technologies. This acquisition
also shows our disciplined approach to making acquisitions. We paid $30.8
million to acquire Anachip and the acquisition was accretive to our 2006
earnings.
On
November 3, 2006, we completed the purchase of the assets of APD Semiconductor,
a privately held U.S.-based fabless semiconductor company. Headquartered in
Redwood City, California, APD's main product focus is its patented and
trademarked Super Barrier Rectifier
TM
(SBR
TM)
technology. The purchase price of the acquisition was $8.4 million in addition
to a potential earn-out provision with respect to pre-defined covered products.
Revenue generated from APD technologies was approximately $500,000 for year
2006. For 2007, we project the revenue generated from the APD product line
to
exceed the purchase price and that the acquisition will be accretive. The APD
acquisition is aligned with our strategy of strengthening our technology
leadership in the standard
semiconductor market and expanding our product capabilities across important
segments of our end-markets.
Net
Sales
We
generate a substantial portion of our net sales through the sale of
semiconductor products that are designed and manufactured by third parties
or
us. We also generate a portion of our net sales from outsourcing our
manufacturing capacity to third parties and from the sale of silicon wafers
to
manufacturers of discrete semiconductor components. We serve customers across
diversified industries, including the consumer electronics, computing,
industrial, communications and automotive markets.
We
recognize revenue from product sales when title to and risk of loss of the
product have passed to the customer, there is persuasive evidence of an
arrangement, the sale price is fixed or determinable and collection of the
related receivable is reasonably assured. These criteria are generally met
upon
shipment to our customers. Net sales are stated net of reserves for pricing
adjustments, discounts, rebates and returns.
The
principal factors that have affected or could affect our net sales from period
to period are:
Ø |
the
condition of the economy in general and of the semiconductor industry
in
particular,
|
Ø |
our
customers’ adjustments in their order
levels,
|
Ø |
changes
in our pricing policies or the pricing policies of our competitors
or
suppliers,
|
Ø |
the
termination of key supplier
relationships,
|
Ø |
the
rate of introduction to, and acceptance of new products by, our
customers,
|
Ø |
our
ability to compete effectively with our current and future
competitors,
|
Ø |
our
ability to enter into and renew key corporate and strategic relationships
with our customers, vendors and strategic
alliances,
|
Ø |
changes
in foreign currency exchange rates,
|
Ø |
a
major disruption of our information technology
infrastructure; and
|
Ø |
unforeseen
catastrophic events, such as armed conflict, terrorism, fires, typhoons
and earthquakes.
|
Cost
of goods sold
Cost
of
goods sold includes manufacturing costs for our semiconductors and our wafers.
These costs include raw materials used in our manufacturing processes as well
as
the labor costs and overhead expenses. Cost of goods sold is also impacted
by
yield improvements, capacity utilization and manufacturing efficiencies. In
addition, cost of goods sold includes the cost of products that we purchase
from
other manufacturers and sell to our customers. Cost of goods sold is also
affected by inventory obsolescence if our inventory management is not
efficient.
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
Selling,
general and administrative expenses relate primarily to compensation and
associated expenses for personnel in general management, sales and marketing,
information technology, engineering, human resources, procurement, planning
and
finance, and sales commissions, as well as outside legal, accounting and
consulting expenses, and other operating expenses. We expect our selling,
general and administrative expenses to increase in absolute dollars as we hire
additional personnel and expand our sales, marketing and engineering efforts
and
information technology infrastructure.
Research
and development expenses
Research
and development expenses consist of compensation and associated costs of
employees engaged in research and development projects, as well as materials
and
equipment used for these projects. Research and development expenses are
primarily associated with our wafer facility in Kansas City, Missouri and our
manufacturing facilities in China and Taiwan, as well as with our engineers
in
the U.S. All research and development expenses are expensed as incurred, and
we
expect our research and development expenses to increase in absolute dollars
as
we invest in new technologies and product lines.
Interest
income/expense
Interest
income consists of interest earned on our cash and investment balances. Interest
expense consists of interest payable on our outstanding credit facilities and
other debt instruments including the convertible bond.
Income
tax provision
Our
global presence requires us to pay income taxes in a number of jurisdictions.
In
general, earnings in the U.S. and Taiwan are currently subject to tax rates
of
39.0% and 35.0%, respectively. Earnings of Diodes-Hong Kong are subject to
a
17.5% tax for local sales or local source sales; all other Hong Kong sales
are
not subject to foreign income taxes. Earnings at Diodes-Taiwan and Diodes-Hong
Kong are also subject to U.S. taxes with respect to those earnings that are
derived from product manufactured by our China subsidiaries and sold to
customers outside of Taiwan and Hong Kong, respectively. The U.S. tax rate
on these earnings is computed as the difference between the foreign effective
tax rates and the U.S. tax rate. In accordance with U.S. tax law, we
receive credit against our U.S. federal tax liability for income taxes paid
by our foreign subsidiaries. Funds
repatriated from foreign subsidiaries to the U.S. may be subject to Federal
and
state income taxes.
Diodes-China
is located in the Songjiang district, where the standard central government
tax
rate is 24.0%. However, as an incentive for establishing Diodes-China, the
earnings of Diodes-China were subject to a 0% tax rate by the central government
from 1996 through 2000, and to a 12.0% tax rate from 2001 through 2006. In
addition, due to an $18.5 million permanent re-investment of Diodes-China
earnings in 2004, Diodes-China has re-applied to the Chinese government for
additional preferential tax treatment on earnings that are generated by this
$18.5 million investment. If approved, those earnings will be exempted from
central government income tax for two years, and then subject to a 12.0% tax
rate for the following three years.
In
addition, the earnings of Diodes-China would ordinarily be subject to a standard
local government tax rate of 3.0%. However, as an incentive for establishing
Diodes-China, the local government waived this tax from 1996 through 2005.
Management expects this tax to be waived for 2006; however, the local government
can re-impose this tax at its discretion at any time.
In
2004,
we established
our second Shanghai-based manufacturing facility, Diodes-Shanghai, located
in
the Songjiang Export Zone of Shanghai, China. In the Songjiang Export Zone,
the
central government standard tax rate is 15.0%. From
2010
onward, Diodes-Shanghai earnings might not continue to be subject to the 15%
tax
rate as a proposed income tax reform is expected to be taking effect in 2007
which could terminate some existing tax incentive for foreign enterprise doing
business in China. There
is
no local government
tax.
During 2004, Diodes-Shanghai earnings were subject to the standard 15.0% central
government tax rate. As an incentive for establishing Diodes-Shanghai, the
2005
and 2006 earnings of Diodes-Shanghai were exempted from central government
income tax, and for the years 2007 through 2009 its earnings will be subject
to
a 7.5% tax rate. From
2010
onward, Diodes-Shanghai earnings might not continue to be subject to the 15%
tax
rate as a proposed income tax reform is expected to be taking effect in 2007
which could terminate some existing tax incentive for foreign enterprise doing
business in China.
With
the
recently proposed China government income tax reform, which could terminate
some
existing tax incentives for foreign enterprises doing business in China, it
is
unclear to what extent our China subsidiaries will continue to receive
preferential tax treatment.
As
an
incentive for the formation of Anachip, earnings of Anachip are subject to
a
five-year tax holiday (subject to certain qualifications of Taiwanese tax law).
In the third quarter of 2006, we elected to begin this five-year tax holiday
as
of January 1, 2006.
As
of
December 31, 2006, accumulated and undistributed earnings of Diodes-China and
Diodes-Shanghai are approximately $67.0 million, including $28.5 million of
restricted earnings (which are not available for dividends). Through March
31,
2002, we had not recorded deferred U.S. Federal or state tax liabilities
(estimated to be $8.9 million as of March 31, 2002) on these cumulative earnings
since we, at that time, considered this investment to be permanent, and had
no
plans or obligation to distribute all or part of that amount from China to
the
U.S. Beginning in April 2002, we began to record deferred taxes on a portion
of
the China earnings in preparation of a dividend distribution. In the year ended
December 31, 2004, we received a dividend of approximately $5.7 million from
our
Diodes-China subsidiary, for which the tax effect is included in U.S. Federal
and state taxable income.
On
October 22, 2004, the President of the United States signed the American Jobs
Creation Act (AJCA) into law. Originally intended to repeal the extraterritorial
income (ETI) exclusion, which had triggered tariffs by the European Union,
the
AJCA expanded
to
cover a wide range of business tax issues. Among other items, the AJCA
establishes a phased repeal of the ETI, a new incentive tax deduction for U.S.
corporations to repatriate cash from foreign subsidiaries at a reduced tax
rate
(a deduction equal to 85% of cash dividends received in the year elected that
exceeds a base-period amount) and significantly revises the taxation of U.S.
companies doing business abroad.
At
December 31, 2004, we made a minimum estimate for repatriating cash from our
subsidiaries in China and Hong Kong of $8.0 million under the AJCA, and recorded
an income tax expense of approximately $1.3 million. Under the guidelines of
the
AJCA, we developed a required domestic reinvestment plan, covering items such
as
U.S. bank debt repayment, U.S. capital expenditures and U.S. research and
development activities, among others, to cover the dividend repatriation. During
2005, we completed a quantitative analysis of the benefits of the AJCA, the
foreign tax credit implications, and state and local tax consequences of the
impact of the AJCA on our plans for repatriation. Based on the analysis, we
repatriated $24.0 million from our foreign subsidiaries in 2005.
We
are
evaluating the need to provide additional deferred taxes for the future earnings
of our foreign subsidiaries to the extent such earnings may be appropriated
for
distribution to our corporate office in North America, and as further investment
strategies with respect to foreign earnings are determined. The distribution
of
any unappropriated funds from our foreign subsidiaries to the U.S. will require
the recording of income tax provisions on the U.S. entity, thus reducing net
income. As of December 31, 2006, we have recorded approximately $3.3 million
in
deferred taxes for earnings of our foreign subsidiaries, primarily Diodes-Hong
Kong.
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The
preparation of financial statements in accordance with Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles (GAAP)
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts
of
revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an on-going basis, we
evaluate our estimates, including those related to revenue recognition,
allowance for doubtful accounts, inventory reserves and income taxes, among
others. Our estimates are based upon historical experiences, market trends
and
financial forecasts and projections, and upon various other assumptions that
management believes to be reasonable under the circumstances and at that certain
point in time. Actual results may differ, significantly at times, from these
estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
We
believe the following critical accounting policies and estimates affect the
significant estimates and judgments we use in the preparation of our
consolidated financial statements, and may involve a higher degree of judgment
and complexity than others.
Revenue
recognition
We
recognize revenue when there is persuasive evidence that an arrangement exists,
when delivery has occurred, when our price to the buyer is fixed or determinable
and when collectibility of the receivable is reasonably assured. These elements
are met when title to the products is passed to the buyers, which is generally
when our product is shipped.
We
reduce
revenue in the period of sale for estimates of product returns, distributor
price adjustments and other allowances, the majority of which are related to
our
North American operations. Our reserve estimates are based upon historical
data
as well as projections of revenues, distributor inventories, price adjustments,
average selling prices and market conditions. Actual returns and adjustments
could be significantly different from our estimates and provisions, resulting
in
an adjustment to revenues.
Inventory
reserves
Inventories
are stated at the lower of cost or market value. Cost is determined principally
by the first-in, first-out method. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our
inventory, both finished goods and raw material, for obsolescence and
slow-moving items. This evaluation includes analysis of sales levels, sales
projections, and purchases by item, as well as raw material usage related to
our
manufacturing facilities. Based upon this analysis, as well as an inventory
aging analysis, we accrue a reserve for obsolete and slow-moving inventory.
If
future demand or market conditions are different than our current estimates,
an
inventory adjustment may be required, and would be reflected in cost of goods
sold in the period the revision is made.
Accounting
for income taxes
As
part
of the process of preparing our consolidated financial statements, we are
required to estimate our income taxes in each of the tax jurisdictions in which
we operate. This process involves using an asset and liability approach whereby
deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded for differences in the
financial reporting bases and tax bases of our assets and liabilities.
Significant management judgment is required in determining our provision for
income taxes, deferred tax assets and liabilities. We continually evaluate
our
deferred tax asset as to whether it is likely that the deferred tax assets
will
be realized. If management ever determined that our deferred tax asset was
not
likely to be realized, a write-down of the asset would be required and would
be
reflected as an expense in the accompanying period.
Allowance
for doubtful accounts
Management
evaluates the collectability of our accounts receivable based upon a combination
of factors, including the current business environment and historical
experience. If we are aware of a customer’s inability to meet its financial
obligations to us, we record an allowance to reduce the receivable to the amount
we reasonably believe we will be able to collect from the customer. For all
other customers, we record an allowance based upon the amount of time the
receivables are past due. If actual accounts receivable collections differ
from
these estimates, an adjustment to the allowance may be necessary with a
resulting effect on operating expense.
Impairment
of long-lived assets
As
of
December 31, 2006, goodwill was $25.0 million ($4.2 million
related to the FabTech acquisition, $0.9 million related to Diodes-China and
$19.9 million related to Anachip). We account for goodwill in accordance with
SFAS No. 142 (“Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”), for which
goodwill is tested for impairment at least annually. We performed the required
impairment tests of goodwill and have determined that the goodwill is fully
recoverable.
We
assess
the impairment of long-lived assets, including goodwill, on an on-going basis
and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying
value
may not be recoverable. Our impairment review process is based upon (i) an
income approach from a discounted cash flow analysis, which uses our estimates
of revenues, costs and expenses, as well as market growth rates, and (ii) a
market multiples approach which measures the value of an asset through an
analysis of recent sales or offerings or comparable public entities. If ever
the
carrying value of the goodwill is determined to be less than the fair value
of
the underlying asset, a write-down of the asset will be required, with the
resulting expense charged in the period that the impairment was
determined.
Share-Based
Compensation
Effective
in January 1, 2006, we adopted SFAS No. 123R, “Share-Based Payments,” using
the modified prospective method. Under SFAS 123R, we are required to select
a
valuation technique or option-pricing model that meets the criteria as stated
in
the standard, which includes a binomial model and the Black-Scholes model.
At
the present time, the Company is continuing to use the Black-Scholes model,
consistent with prior period valuations under SFAS 123. No modifications were
made to any outstanding share-options prior to the adoption of SFAS
123R.
The
adoption of SFAS 123R, applying the “modified prospective method,” as elected by
us, requires us to value stock options prior to our adoption of SFAS 123 under
the fair value method and expense these amounts over the stock options'
remaining vesting period. This resulted in the expensing of $6.5 million in
the
year ended December 31, 2006, which was recorded within the cost of goods sold
expense, general and administrative expense and research and development expense
on our condensed consolidated income statement. In addition, SFAS 123R requires
us to reflect any tax savings resulting from tax deductions in excess of expense
reflected in our financial statements as a financing cash inflow in our
statement of cash flows rather than as an operating cash flow as in prior
periods (See “Note 13 - Share-based Compensation” for details). We have changed
our primary award type to employees from stock options to stock awards as an
improved method of employee reward and retention. In general, we increased
the
vesting period from three years to four years, and reduced the number of shares
subject to the award by a factor of three.
We
have
567,748 restricted stock grants outstanding as of December 31, 2006. The
restricted stock grants will be recorded each quarter as a non-cash operating
expense item. As of December 31, 2006, there was $10.2 million of total
unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested share-based compensation.
This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 3.0
years. In the year ended December 31, 2006, an expense of $1.8 million was
recorded. In addition to the expense, the effects of the restricted stock grants
are included in the diluted shares outstanding calculation.
Results
of Operations
The
following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the percentage that
certain items in the statement of income bear to net sales and the percentage
dollar increase (decrease) of such items from period to period.
|
|
Percent
of Net sales
|
|
Percentage
Dollar Increase (Decrease)
|
|
|
|
Year
Ended December 31,
|
|
Year
Ended Decemeber 31,
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
2003
|
|
2004
|
|
2005
|
|
2006
|
|
'02
to '03
|
|
'03
to '04
|
|
'04
to '05
|
|
'05
to '06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
sales
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
18.2
|
%
|
|
35.6
|
%
|
|
15.6
|
%
|
|
59.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
of goods sold
|
|
|
(76.9
|
)
|
|
(73.3
|
)
|
|
(67.3
|
)
|
|
(65.4
|
)
|
|
(66.8
|
)
|
|
12.6
|
|
|
24.5
|
|
|
12.3
|
|
|
63.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
profit
|
|
|
23.1
|
|
|
26.7
|
|
|
32.7
|
|
|
34.6
|
|
|
33.2
|
|
|
36.8
|
|
|
66.3
|
|
|
22.5
|
|
|
53.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
expenses
|
|
|
(15.4
|
)
|
|
(16.6
|
)
|
|
(14.5
|
)
|
|
(15.8
|
)
|
|
(16.4
|
)
|
|
27.8
|
|
|
18.8
|
|
|
25.8
|
|
|
66.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
from operations
|
|
|
7.7
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
|
18.2
|
|
|
18.8
|
|
|
16.7
|
|
|
54.5
|
|
|
143.9
|
|
|
19.8
|
|
|
42.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
income (expense)
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
(27.3
|
)
|
|
(25.9
|
)
|
|
(134.7
|
)
|
|
2215.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
income (expense)
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
(0.0
|
)
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
(107.5
|
)
|
|
(8260.0
|
)
|
|
197.1
|
|
|
463.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
before taxes and minority interest
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
9.5
|
|
|
17.6
|
|
|
19.1
|
|
|
17.8
|
|
|
65.5
|
|
|
152.0
|
|
|
25.6
|
|
|
48.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
tax provision
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)
|
|
(1.8
|
)
|
|
(3.5
|
)
|
|
(3.1
|
)
|
|
(3.4
|
)
|
|
42.3
|
|
|
164.8
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
74.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority
interest
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
36.3
|
|
|
54.9
|
|
|
61.8
|
|
|
17.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
|
13.8
|
|
|
15.5
|
|
|
14.0
|
|
|
74.0
|
|
|
153.1
|
|
|
30.4
|
|
|
44.4
|
|
The
following discussion explains in greater detail the consolidated financial
condition of the Company. This discussion should be read in conjunction with
the
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere herein.
All per share amounts have been adjusted to reflect the three-for-two stock
split in December 2005.
Year
2006 Compared to Year 2005
Net
sales
Net
sales
for 2006 increase $128.5 million to $343.3 million from $214.8 million for
2005.
The 59.9% increase was due primarily to a 42.6% increase in units sold combined
with a 12.1% increase in average selling prices (ASP). The increase in ASP
was
due to the product lines related to the Anachip and APD
acquisitions. The following table sets forth the geographic
breakdown of our net sales for the periods indicated based on the country
to
which the product is shipped:
|
|
Net
sales for the year
ended
December 31
|
|
Percentage
of
Net
sales
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
China
|
|
$
|
68,050
|
|
$
|
118,303
|
|
|
31.7
|
%
|
|
34.5
|
%
|
Taiwan
|
|
|
59,838
|
|
|
96,401
|
|
|
27.9
|
%
|
|
28.1
|
%
|
United
States
|
|
|
54,981
|
|
|
76,357
|
|
|
25.6
|
%
|
|
22.2
|
%
|
All
Others
|
|
|
31,896
|
|
|
52,247
|
|
|
14.9
|
%
|
|
15.2
|
%
|
Total
|
|
$
|
214,765
|
|
$
|
343,308
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Cost
of goods sold
Cost
of
goods sold increased $89.0 million, or 63.4%, for 2006 compared to $140.4
million in 2005. As a percent of sales, cost of goods sold increased from 65.4%
for 2005 to 66.8% for 2006. Our average unit cost (AUP) for discrete devices
decreased approximately 4.4% from 2005, and AUPs for wafer products increased
approximately 6.0%. As
per
SFAS
123R, included in cost of goods sold for 2006 was $469,000 of non-cash, stock
option compensation expense related to our manufacturing
facilities.
Gross
profit
Gross
profit for 2006 increased 53.1% to $113.9 million from $74.4 million for 2005.
Gross margin as a percentage of net sales was at 33.2% for the year of 2006,
down from 34.6% for the year of 2005. The decreased gross margin was primarily
due to the lower margin product line related to the Anachip acquisition.
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
Selling,
general and administrative expenses (SG&A) for 2006 increased approximately
$17.7 million, or 58.3%, compared to $30.3 million in 2005, due primarily
to (i) an approximately $5.4 million increase associated with non-cash,
share-based compensation expense due to our adoption of SFAS 123R, (ii) higher
sales commissions, wages and marketing expenses associated with the acquisition
of Anachip, and (iii) audit and legal expenses associated with Sarbanes-Oxley
Act compliance. SG&A, as a percentage of net sales, was 14.0% in 2006,
compared to 14.1% in 2005. Included in SG&A for the year ended December 31,
2006 was an approximate $620,000 adjustment due to an overstatement of
restricted share grant expense recorded in 2005. For comparable purposes,
excluding the $5.4 million of share-based compensation, SG&A for the year
ended December 31, 2006 would have improved to 12.4% of total
sales.
Research
and development expenses
Research
and development expenses (R&D) in 2006 increased $4.6 million to $8.3
million, or 2.4% of net sales from $3.7 million, or 1.7% of net sales, in 2005.
R&D expenses are primarily related to new product development at the silicon
wafer level, and, to a lesser extent, at the packaging level. We continue to
seek to hire qualified engineers who fit our focus on next-generation processes
and packaging technologies. Our current goal is to maintain R&D at 2-3% of
revenue as we continue to bring proprietary technology and advanced devices
to
the market.
Interest
income/expense
Net
interest income for 2006 was $5.1 million compared to net interest income of
$221,000 in 2005, due primarily to interest income earned on proceeds from
the
offering of convertible notes, as well as to a reduction in our bank loans
from
$10.7 million at December 31, 2005 to $8.5 million at December 31,
2006. Our interest income is generated from interest earned on our $48.9 million
cash balances and $291.0 million short-term investments. Our interest expense
is
primarily the $1.1 million interest payable for $230 million convertible
notes.
Other
income/loss
Other
loss for the year ended December 31, 2006 was $1.5 million, compared to other
income $406,000 for the same period of 2005.
Included
in other expense for the year ended December 31, 2006, was an approximate $1.1
million one-time, non-cash, prior periods adjustment due to the understatement
of intercompany currency exchange losses at our Taiwan subsidiary.
Income
tax provision
We
recognized income tax expense of $11.7 million for 2006, resulting in an
effective tax rate of 19.1%, as compared to $6.7 million or 16.3% for the same
period in 2005, due primarily to higher income in the U.S. at higher tax rates
and accrued dividend related taxes for our foreign subsidiaries.
Minority
interest in joint venture earnings
Minority
interest in joint venture earnings primarily represented the minority investor's
share of the earnings of our China subsidiaries for the period. The joint
venture investments were eliminated in the consolidations of our financial
statements, and the activities of Diodes-China, Diodes-Shanghai and
Diodes-Anachip were included therein. As of December 31, 2006, we had 95%
controlling interests in Diodes-China and Diodes-Shanghai, and a 99.81%
controlling interest in Diodes-Anachip.
Net
income
We
generated net income of $48.1 million (or $1.88 basic earnings per share
and $1.74 diluted earnings per share) for the twelve months ended
December 31, 2006. For comparison purposes, excluding $5.3 million net of
tax stock option expenses, pro forma net income was $53.4 million (or $2.09
basic earnings per share and $1.89 diluted earnings per share) for the twelve
months ended December 31, 2006, as compared to $33.3 million (or $1.44
basic earnings per share and $1.29 diluted earnings per share) for the same
period in 2005.
Year
2005 Compared to Year 2004
Net
sales
Net
sales
for 2005 increased $29.1 million to $214.8 million from $185.7 million for
2004.
The 15.6% increase was due primarily to an approximately 36.0% increase in
units
sold as a result of increased end-market demand for our products, partly offset
by a 15.0% decrease in ASPs. ASPs for discrete products decreased by 10.7%
while
ASPs for wafers fell 17.3%. The following table sets forth the geographic
breakdown of our net sales for the periods indicated based on the country to
which the product is shipped:
|
|
Net
sales for the year
ended
December 31
|
|
Percentage
of
Net
sales
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
China
|
|
$
|
44,311
|
|
$
|
68,050
|
|
|
23.9
|
%
|
|
31.7
|
%
|
Taiwan
|
|
|
50,716
|
|
|
59,838
|
|
|
27.3
|
%
|
|
27.9
|
%
|
United
States
|
|
|
53,204
|
|
|
54,981
|
|
|
28.7
|
%
|
|
25.6
|
%
|
All
Others
|
|
|
37,472
|
|
|
31,896
|
|
|
20.2
|
%
|
|
14.9
|
%
|
Total
|
|
$
|
185,703
|
|
$
|
214,765
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Cost
of goods sold
Cost
of
goods sold increased $15.4 million, or 12.3%, for 2005 compared to $125.0
million in 2004. As a percent of sales, cost of goods sold decreased from 67.3%
for 2004 to 65.4% for 2005. Our AUP for discrete devices decreased approximately
14.3% from 2004, and AUPs for wafer products decreased approximately 14.9%.
These cost decreases were due primarily to improved manufacturing
efficiencies.
Gross
profit
Gross
profit for 2005 increased 22.5% to $74.4 million from $60.7 million for 2004.
Of
the $13.7 million increase, $9.6 million was due to the 190 basis point increase
in gross profit margin from 32.7% in 2004 to 34.6% in 2005, while $4.1 million
was due to the 22.5% increase in net sales. Gross profit increases in Asia
were
the primary contributor to the gross profit increase in 2005. The higher gross
margin percentage was due primarily to improved product sales mix, increased
capacity utilization and manufacturing efficiencies, partially offset by pricing
pressure on our wafer products.
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
SG&A
for 2005 increased approximately $6.8 million, or 28.9%, compared to $23.5
million 2004, due primarily to (i) a $1.8 million expense relating to share
inducement grants made to our President and Chief Executive Officer, and our
Vice Chairman, (ii) higher sales commissions, wages and marketing expenses
associated with increased sales and, (iii) consulting, legal and accounting
fees primarily associated with Sarbanes-Oxley compliance. SG&A, as a
percentage of net sales, was 14.1% in 2005, compared to 12.7% in
2004.
Research
and development expenses
R&D
increased to $3.7 million, or 1.7% of net sales, in 2005 from $3.4 million,
or
1.8% of net sales, in 2004. R&D expenses are primarily related to new
product development at the silicon wafer level, and, to a lesser extent, at
the
packaging level.
Gain
on sale of fixed assets
Gain
on
sale of fixed assets of $102,000 for 2005 was due primarily to a gain on the
termination of two capital leases in China.
Interest
income / expense
Net
interest income for 2005 was $221,000 compared to net interest expense of
$620,000 in 2004, due primarily to interest income earned on proceeds from
our
public offering of equity securities in 2005, as well as to a reduction in
our
total debt from $17.5 million at December 31, 2004 to $12.5 million at
December 31, 2005. Our interest income is generated from interest earned on
our
cash balances and short-term investments. Our interest expense has been
primarily the result of borrowings to finance the FabTech acquisition in 2000,
as well as our ongoing investment in, and expansion of, our Diodes-China and
Diodes-Shanghai manufacturing facilities.
Other
income
Other
income for 2005 increased $824,000 from 2004, due primarily to lower currency
exchange losses in Taiwan as well as the expiration of management incentive
agreements associated with the FabTech acquisition.
Income
tax provision
We
recognized income tax expense of $6.7 million for 2005, resulting in an
effective tax rate of 16.3%, as compared to $6.5 million or 19.9% for the same
period in 2004, due primarily to an increase in profits earned in lower tax
rate
jurisdictions.
Minority
interest in joint venture earnings
Minority
interest in joint venture earnings represents the minority investor’s share of
the income of Diodes-China and Diodes-Shanghai (established in 2004). The
increase in these subsidiaries’ income for the twelve months ended
December 31, 2005 is primarily the result of increased sales and
manufacturing efficiencies. As of December 31, 2005, we had a 95% controlling
interest in each of these subsidiaries.
Net
income
We
generated net income of $33.3 million (or $1.44 basic earnings per share
and $1.29 diluted earnings per share) for the twelve months ended
December 31, 2005, as compared to $25.6 million (or $1.27 basic
earnings per share and $1.10 diluted earnings per share) for the same period
in
2004. This 30.4% increase in net income is due primarily to the 15.6% net sales
increase at a gross profit margin of 34.6% for 2005, compared to a gross profit
margin of 32.7% in 2004.
Financial
Condition
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Our
primary sources of liquidity are cash, funds from operations and borrowings
under our credit facilities. Our primary liquidity requirements have been to
meet our inventory and capital expenditure needs. For 2004, 2005 and 2006,
our
working capital was $49.6 million, $146.7 million, and $395.4 million,
respectively. We anticipate our working capital position will be sufficient
for
at least the next 12 months.
During
2005, we sold 3.2 million (stock split adjusted) shares of our Common Stock
in a
follow-on public offering, raising approximately $72 million (net of commissions
and expenses). We used approximately $31 million of the net proceeds in
connection with the Anachip acquisition, and we intend to use the remaining
net
proceeds from this offering for working capital and other general corporate
purposes, including additional acquisitions.
On
October 12. 2006, we issued and sold convertible senior notes with an aggregate
principal amount of $230 million due 2026 (“Notes”), which pay 2.25% interest
per annum on the principal amount of the Notes, payable semi-annually in arrears
on April 1 and October 1 of each year, beginning on April 1, 2007. We intend
to
use the net proceeds for working capital and general corporate purposes, which
may include the acquisition of businesses, products, product rights or
technologies, strategic investments, or additional purchases of Common
Stock.
In
connection with the issuance of the Notes, we incurred approximately $6.2
million of issuance costs, which primarily consisted of investment banker fees,
legal and accounting fees. These costs are classified within Other Assets and
are being amortized as a component of interest expense using the straight-line
method over the life of the Notes from issuance through October 12,
2011.
In
2004,
2005 and 2006, our capital expenditures were $26.5 million,
$24.7 million and $45.1 million, respectively. Our capital
expenditures for these periods were primarily related to manufacturing expansion
in our facilities in China and, to a lesser extent, our wafer fabrication
facility in the United States, and an office building in Taiwan. Excluding
this
non-production related $6 million building purchase in Taiwan, the capital
expenditures for 2006 were approximately 11.4% of revenue, which is in the
range
of our 10-12% full-year estimate.
Discussion
of cash flows
Cash
and
short-term investments have increased from $19.0 million at
December 31, 2004, to $113.6 million at December 31, 2005, to
$339.9 million at December 31, 2006. The increase from 2004 to 2005
was
primarily due to the proceeds from the follow-on offering. During 2006, we
increased short-term investments to $339.9 million from the proceeds of the
convertible note offering.
Operating
activities
Net
cash
provided by operating activities during 2006 was $72.1 million, resulting
primarily from $48.1 million of net income in this period. Net cash
provided by operating activities was $47.7 million for 2005 and
$20.8 million for 2004. Net cash provided by operations increased by
$24.4 million from 2005 to 2006. This increase resulted primarily from a
$14.8 million increase in our net income (from $33.3 million in 2005
to $48.1 million in 2006), $6.5
million increase in non-cash, share-based compensation expense, and $4.8 million
increase in depreciation and amortization expense, partially
offset by increases in inventories, resulting from slower inventory turns,
and
increases in accounts receivable and prepaid expenses and other assets. We
continue to closely monitor our credit terms with our customers, while at times
providing extended terms, primarily required by our customers in Asia and
Europe.
Investing
activities
Net
cash
used by investing activities for 2006 was $325.7 million resulting from
capital expenditures of $45.7 million, including the $6 million office building
purchase in Taiwan, $250.7 million short-term investments of municipal bonds
and
$29.4 million used for acquisitions including the final acquisition payment
for
Anachip of $21.0 million (net of cash acquired) and the $8.4 million APD
acquisition payment.
Financing
activities
Net
cash
provided by financing activities for 2006 was $229.0 million, resulting
primarily from $224.0 million in net proceeds from the offering of convertible
notes and $4.8 million loan proceeds in Taiwan secured by land and building,
offset by $10.4 million debt repayment. In addition, we received $4.3
million from stock option exercises in 2006 and $6.7 million in excess tax
benefits related to stock option exercise. Net cash provided by financing
activities was $73.7 million for 2005 and $10.7 million for 2004. Net
cash provided by financing activities for 2005 was $73.7 million, resulting
primarily from $71.7 million in net proceeds from the offering of equity
securities, offset by $10.9 million in debt repayment. In addition, we
received $4.2 million from stock option exercises in 2005 and $2.9 million
in
excess tax benefits related to stock option exercise. Net cash provided by
financing activities for 2004 was primarily due to $5.6 million received in
connection with the exercise of stock options and excess tax benefits of $8.5
million related to stock option exercise, partially offset by $7.1 million
repaid under our debt instruments.
Debt
instruments
On
October 12, 2006, we issued $230 million in aggregate principal convertible
senior notes due on October 1, 2026, which pay interest semiannually at a rate
of 2.25% per annum. The notes will be convertible, in certain circumstances,
into cash up to the principal amount, and any conversion value above the
principal amount will be convertible, at our option, into cash or shares of
Common Stock, at an initial conversion rate of 17.0946 shares per $1,000
principal amount of notes (which represents an initial conversion price of
$58.50 per share). The initial conversion price represents a 39.68% conversion
premium, based on the last reported sale price of $41.88 of our Common Stock
on
October 5, 2006.
On
August 29, 2005, we amended our U.S. credit arrangements with Union
Bank of California, N.A. (Union Bank). Under the second amendment to our amended
and restated credit agreement, we now have available a revolving credit
commitment of up to $20.0 million, including a $5.0 million letter of
credit sub-facility. In addition, and in connection with this amendment, one
of
our subsidiaries, FabTech, also amended and restated a term note and related
agreement with respect to an existing term loan arrangement, which we refer
to
as the FabTech term loan. After giving effect to this amendment, the principal
amount under the FabTech term loan was increased to
$5.0 million.
The
revolving credit commitment expires on August 29, 2008. The FabTech term
loan, which amortizes monthly, matures on August 29, 2010. As of December
31, 2006, we had no amounts outstanding under our revolving credit facility,
and
$3.7 million was outstanding under the FabTech term loan. Loans to us under
our credit facility are guaranteed by FabTech, and in turn, the FabTech term
loan is guaranteed by us. The purpose of the revolving credit facility is to
provide cash for domestic working capital purposes, and to fund permitted
acquisitions.
All
loans
under the credit facility and the FabTech term loan are collateralized by all
of
our U.S. accounts, instruments, chattel paper, documents, general intangibles,
inventory, equipment, furniture and fixtures, pursuant to security agreements
entered into by us in connection with these credit arrangements.
Any
amounts borrowed under the revolving credit facility and the FabTech term loan
bear interest at LIBOR plus 1.15%. At December 31, 2006, the effective rate
under both the credit agreement and the FabTech term loan was LIBOR plus 1.15%,
or approximately 6.51%.
The
credit agreement contains covenants that require us to maintain a leverage
ratio
not greater than 2.25 to 1.0, an interest expense coverage ratio of not less
than 2.0 to 1.0 and a current ratio of not less than 1.0 to 1.0. It also
requires us to achieve a net profit before taxes, as of the last day of each
fiscal quarter, for the two consecutive fiscal quarters ending on that date
of
not less than $1. The credit agreement permits us to pay dividends to our
stockholders to the extent that any such dividends declared or paid in any
fiscal year do not exceed an amount equal to 50% of our net profit after taxes
for such fiscal year. However, it limits our ability to dispose of assets,
incur
additional indebtedness, engage in liquidation or merger, acquisition,
partnership or other combination (except permitted acquisitions). The credit
agreement also contains customary representations, warranties, affirmative
and
negative covenants and events of default.
The
agreements governing the FabTech term loan do not contain any financial or
negative covenants. However, they provide that a default under our credit
agreement will cause a cross-default under the FabTech term loan.
As
of
December 31, 2005, FabTech had paid down $3.75 million, to pay in full
a note in favor of LSC, which debt was incurred in connection with our
acquisition of FabTech from LSC in 2000. This note matured on June 30, 2006
and amortized monthly. The obligations under this note were subordinated to
the
obligations under our U.S. credit agreement with Union Bank.
As
of
December 31, 2006, our Asia subsidiaries have available lines of credit of
up to
an aggregate of $34.8 million with
a
number of Chinese and Taiwanese financial institutions. These lines of credit,
except for one Taiwanese credit facility, are collateralized by its premises,
are unsecured, uncommitted and, in some instances, may be repayable on demand.
Loans under these lines of credit bear interest at LIBOR or similar indices
plus
a specified margin.
As
of
December 31, 2006, Diodes-China owed $1.4 million under a note to one
of our customers, which debt was incurred in connection with our investing
in
manufacturing equipment. We repay this unsecured and interest-free note in
quarterly price concession installments, with any remaining balance due in
July
2008.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
We
do not
have any transactions, arrangements and other relationships with unconsolidated
entities that will affect our liquidity or capital resources. We have no special
purpose entities that provided off-balance sheet financing, liquidity or market
or credit risk support, nor do we engage in leasing, hedging or research and
development services, that could expose us to liability that is not reflected
on
the face of our financial statements.
Contractual
Obligations
The
following table represents our contractual obligations as of December 31,
2006:
|
|
Payments
due by period (in thousands)
|
|
Contractual
Obligations
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
1-3
years
|
|
3-5
years
|
|
|
|
Long-term
debt
|
|
$
|
239,917
|
|
$
|
2,802
|
|
$
|
2,695
|
|
$
|
1,388
|
|
$
|
233,032
|
|
Capital
leases
|
|
|
1,868
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
370
|
|
|
370
|
|
|
943
|
|
Operating
leases
|
|
|
16,169
|
|
|
4,096
|
|
|
5,870
|
|
|
6,176
|
|
|
27
|
|
Purchase
obligations
|
|
|
7,466
|
|
|
7,466
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
Total
obligations
|
|
$
|
265,420
|
|
$
|
15,549
|
|
$
|
8,935
|
|
$
|
7,934
|
|
$
|
234,002
|
|
Inflation
did not have a material effect on net sales or net income in fiscal years 2004
through 2006. A significant increase in inflation could affect future
performance.
Recently
Issued Accounting Pronouncements and Proposed Accounting
Changes
In
February 2007, the FASB issued FAS 159, The Fair Value Option for financial
assets and financial liabilities - including an amendment of FASB statement
No.
115 (“FAS 159”). SFAS 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial
instruments and certain other items at fair value. The objective is to improve
financial reporting by providing entities with the opportunity to mitigate
volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and
liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting
provisions. FAS 159 is expected to expand the use of fair value measurement,
which is consistent with the long-term measurement objectives for accounting
for
financial instruments. FAS 159 is effective for financial statements issued
for
fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 with early adoption permitted.
No
entity is permitted to apply this Statement retrospectively to fiscal years
preceding the effective date unless the entity chooses early adoption. The
Company has not yet determined the effect, if any, that the implementation
of
FAS 159 will have on our results of operations or financial
condition.
In
September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Staff
Position (FSP) AIG AIR-1, “Accounting for Planned Major Maintenance Activities”
(“FSP AUG AIR-1”). FSP AUG AIR-1 addresses the accounting for planned major
maintenance activities. Specifically, the FSP prohibits the practice of the
accrue-in-advance method of accounting for planned major maintenance activities.
FSP AUG AIR-1 is effective for the first fiscal year beginning after December
15, 2006. Retrospective application is required unless impracticable. We do
not
believe the adoption of FSP AUG AIR-1 will have a material impact on our
consolidated financial statements.
In
September 2006, FASB issued FAS 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined
Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans - an Amendment of FASB Statements
No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R)” ("FAS 158"). FAS 158 requires an employer that
is a business entity and sponsors one or more single employer benefit plans
to
(1) recognize the funded status of the benefit in its statement of
financial position, (2) recognize as a component of other comprehensive income,
net of tax, the gains or losses and prior service costs or credits that
arise during the period, but are not recognized as components of net periodic
benefit cost, (3) measure defined benefit plan assets and obligations as of
the date of the employer's fiscal year end statement of financial position
and
(4) disclose in the notes to financial statements additional information
about certain effects on net periodic benefit cost for the next fiscal year
that
arise from delayed recognition of the gains or losses, prior service costs
on credits, and transition asset or obligations. We do not expect FAS 158 to
have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In
September 2006, the FASB issued FAS 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“FAS 157”).
SFAS 157 clarifies the principle that fair value should be based on the
assumptions market participants would use when pricing an asset or liability
and
establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the information used to
develop those assumptions. Under the standard, fair value measurements would
be
separately disclosed by level within the fair value hierarchy. FAS 157 is
effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years, with early
adoption permitted. The Company has not yet determined the effect, if any,
that
the implementation of FAS 157 will have on our results of operations or
financial condition.
In
September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) issued Staff
Accounting Bulletin No. 108, “Considering the Effects of Prior Year
Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial
Statements” (“SAB 108”). SAB 108 provides interpretive guidance on how the
effects of the carryover or reversal of prior year misstatements should be
considered in quantifying a current year misstatement. The SEC staff believes
that registrants should quantify errors using both a balance sheet and an income
statement approach and evaluate whether either approach results in quantifying
a
misstatement that, when all relevant quantitative and qualitative factors are
considered, is material. SAB 108 is effective for the Company’s fiscal year
ending December 31, 2007. We do not expect SAB 108 to have a material impact
on
our consolidated financial statements.
In
July
2006, the FASB issued FASB interpretation (FIN) No. 48, "Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes" which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty
in
income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements in accordance
with FASB Statement No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes." FIN 48 prescribes
a
comprehensive model for how companies should recognize, measure, present, and
disclose in their financial statements uncertain tax positions taken or expected
to be taken on a tax return. Under FIN 48, tax positions shall initially be
recognized in the financial statements when it is more likely than not the
position will be sustained upon examination by the tax authorities. Such tax
positions shall initially and subsequently be measured as the largest amount
of
tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate
settlement with the tax authority assuming full knowledge of the position and
all relevant facts. FIN 48 also revises disclosure requirements to include
an
annual tabular rollforward of unrecognized tax benefits. FIN 48 is effective
for
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The cumulative effects, if
any,
of adopting FIN 48 will be recorded as an adjustment to retained earnings as
of
the beginning of the period of adoption. We continue to evaluate the impact
of
FIN 48 on our consolidated financial statements, and at this time, we do not
know the impact upon adoption of this standard.
In
March
2006, the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) reached a consensus on EITF Issue
No. 06-3, “How Taxes Collected from Customers and Remitted to Governmental
Authorities Should be Presented in the Income Statement (that is, Gross versus
Net Presentation).” Taxes within the scope of EITF Issue No. 06-3 include any
taxes assessed by a governmental authority that are directly imposed on a
revenue-producing transaction between a seller and a customer and may include,
but are not limited to, sales taxes, use taxes, value-added taxes, and some
excise taxes. The EITF concluded that the presentation of these taxes on either
a gross (included in revenues and costs) or a net (excluded from revenues)
basis
is an accounting policy decision that should be disclosed. For any such taxes
that are reported on a gross basis, a company should disclose the amounts of
those taxes in interim and annual financial statements. The Company’s policy is
to exclude all such taxes, if any, from revenue. The provisions of EITF 06-3
are
effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December
15,
2006. The adoption of EITF 06-3 will not have any material effect on our
consolidated financial statements.
Item
7A. Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Foreign
Currency Risk.
We face
exposure to adverse movements in foreign currency exchange rates, primarily
in
Asia. Our foreign currency risk may change over time as the level of activity
in
foreign markets grows and could have an adverse impact upon our financial
results. Certain of our assets, including certain bank accounts and accounts
receivable, and liabilities exist in non-U.S. dollar denominated
currencies, which are sensitive to foreign currency exchange fluctuations.
These
currencies are principally the Chinese Yuan and the Taiwanese dollar and, to
a
lesser extent, the Japanese Yen, the Euro and the Hong Kong dollar. Because
of
the relatively small size and nature of each individual currency exposure,
we do
not regularly employ hedging techniques designed to mitigate foreign currency
exposures. Therefore, we do experience currency gains and losses. If the Chinese
Yuan and the Taiwanese dollar were to strengthen or weaken by 1.0% against
the
U.S. dollar, we would experience currency losses of approximately $115,000
and $387,000, respectively. In the future, we may enter into hedging
arrangements designed to mitigate foreign currency fluctuations.
The
Chinese government does not permit the Chinese Yuan to float and be traded
freely compared to other world currencies. Should the Chinese government allow
a
significant Chinese Yuan appreciation, and we do not take appropriate means
to
offset this exposure, the effect could have an adverse impact upon our financial
results.
Interest
Rate Risk. We
have
credit facilities with U.S. and Asian financial institutions as well as other
debt instruments with interest rates equal to LIBOR or similar indices plus
a
negotiated margin. A rise in interest rates could have an adverse impact upon
our cost of working capital and our interest expense. In July 2001, we entered
into an interest rate swap agreement to hedge our exposure to variability in
expected future cash flows resulting from interest rate risk related to a
portion of our long-term debt. The interest rate under the swap agreement was
fixed at 6.8% and was based on the notional amount of
U.S. $2.3 million as of December 31, 2003. The swap contract was
inversely correlated to the related hedged long-term debt and was therefore
considered an effective cash flow hedge of the underlying long-term debt. The
level of effectiveness of the hedge was measured by the changes in the market
value of the hedged long-term debt resulting from fluctuation in interest rates.
At November 30, 2004 the interest rate swap agreement on our long-term debt
expired. As a matter of policy, we do not enter into derivative transactions
for
trading or speculative purposes. As of December 31, 2006, our outstanding
debt under our interest-bearing credit agreements was $239.9 million,
including $230 million convertible notes with a fixed interest rate of 2.25%.
Based on an increase or decrease in interest rates by 1.0% for the year, our
annual interest rate expense would increase or decrease by approximately
$99,000.
Political
Risk. We
have a
significant portion of our assets in mainland China and Taiwan. The possibility
of political conflict between the two countries or with the United States could
have an adverse impact upon our ability to transact business through these
important business segments and to generate profits. See “Risk Factors - Foreign
Operations.”
Item
8. Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data
See
“Item
15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules” for the Company’s Consolidated
Financial Statements and the notes and schedules thereto filed as part of this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item
9. Changes
In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial
Disclosure
Not
Applicable.
Item
9A. Controls
and Procedures
Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
The
Company's Chief Executive Officer, Dr. Keh-Shew Lu, and Chief Financial
Officer, Carl C. Wertz, with the participation of the Company's management,
carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure
controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e). Based upon
that
evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer believe
that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company's
disclosure controls and procedures are effective to provide reasonable assurance
that material information relating to the Company (including its consolidated
subsidiaries) required to be included in this report is made known to
them.
Disclosure
controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and implemented, can
provide only reasonable assurance of achieving an entity's disclosure
objectives. The likelihood of achieving such objectives is affected by
limitations inherent in disclosure controls and procedures. These include the
fact that human judgment in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns
in
internal control can occur because of human failures such as simple errors,
mistakes or intentional circumvention of the established processes.
Management’s
Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management
is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over
financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is a process
designed by, or under the supervision of, the Company's Chief Executive Officer
and the Chief Financial Officer and implemented by the Company's Board of
Directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles in the United States of America.
The
Company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and
procedures that: (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable
detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of
the
assets of the Company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are
recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States
of
America, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only
in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company;
and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection
of
unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company's assets that could
have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because
of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may
not
prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of
effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance
with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Under
the
supervision and with the participation from management, including our Chief
Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation
of
the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on
the
framework and criteria established in Internal
Control - Integrated Framework
issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
This evaluation included review of the documentation of controls, testing of
operating effectiveness of controls and a conclusion on this evaluation. Based
on this evaluation, management concluded that the Company’s internal control
over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2006. Management's
assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2006 has been audited by Moss Adams LLP, an independent
registered public accounting firm, who has expressed unqualified opinions on
management's assessment and on the effectiveness of the Company's internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006 as stated in their
report which is included in Item 8 of this Report.
Changes
in Internal Control
There
was
no change in our internal control over financial reporting, known to the Chief
Executive Officer or the Chief Financial Officer, that occurred during the
last
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial
reporting.
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Board
of
Directors and Stockholders
Diodes
Incorporated and Subsidiaries
We
have
audited management's assessment, included in the accompanying Management's
Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting that Diodes Incorporated
and
Subsidiaries maintained effective internal control over financial reporting
as
of December 31, 2006, based on criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control - Integrated
Framework. Diodes Incorporated and Subsidiaries’ management is responsible for
maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assessment and
an
opinion on the effectiveness of the capitalize company's internal control over
financial reporting based on our audit.
We
conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we
plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective
internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control
over
financial reporting, evaluating management's assessment, testing and evaluating
the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing
such
other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe
that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A
company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
A
company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies
and
procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable
detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of
the
assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are
recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts
and
expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with
authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a
material effect on the financial statements.
Because
of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may
not
prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of
effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance
with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In
our
opinion, management's assessment that Diodes Incorporated and Subsidiaries
maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December
31, 2006, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on criteria set
forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO) in Internal Control - Integrated Framework. Also in our opinion, Diodes
Incorporated and Subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective
internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on
criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO) in Internal Control - Integrated Framework.
We
have
also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements and
financial statement schedule of Diodes Incorporated and Subsidiaries as of
and
for the year ended December 31, 2006, and our report dated February 28, 2007
expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements
and
financial statement schedule.
/s/
Moss
Adams LLP
Moss
Adams LLP
Los
Angeles, California
February
28, 2007
Item
9B. Other
Information
None.
PART
III
Item
10. Directors,
Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
The
information concerning the directors, executive officers and corporate
governance of the Company is incorporated herein by reference from the section
entitled "Proposal One - Election of Directors" contained in the definitive
proxy statement of the Company to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A within
120
days after the Company's fiscal year end of December 31, 2006, for its annual
stockholders' meeting for 2007 (the "Proxy Statement").
We
have
adopted a code of ethics that applies to our Chief Executive Officer and senior
financial officers. The code of ethics has been posted on our website under
the
Corporate Governance portion of the Investor Relations section at
www.diodes.com. We intend to satisfy disclosure requirements regarding
amendments to, or waivers from, any provisions of our code of ethics on our
website.
Item
11. Executive
Compensation
The
information concerning executive compensation is incorporated herein by
reference from the section entitled “Proposal One - Election of Directors”
contained in the Proxy Statement.
Item
12.
|
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related
Stockholder Matters
|
The
information concerning the security ownership of certain beneficial owners
and
management and related stockholder matters is incorporated herein by reference
from the section entitled “General Information - Security Ownership of Certain
Beneficial Owners and Management” and “Proposal One - Election of Directors”
contained in the Proxy Statement.
Item
13. Certain
Relationships, Related Transactions and Director
Independence
The
information concerning certain relationships, related transactions and director
independence is incorporated herein by reference from the section entitled
“Proposal One - Election of Directors - Certain Relationships, Related
Transactions and Director Independence” and “Proposal One - Elections of
Directors” contained in the Proxy Statement.
Item
14. Principal
Accountant Fees and Services
The
information concerning the Company’s principal accountant’s fees and services is
incorporated herein by reference from the section entitled “Ratification of the
Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in the Proxy
Statement.
PART
IV
Item
15. Exhibits
and Financial Statement Schedules
(a) Financial
Statements and Schedules
(1) Financial statements: |
Page
|
|
|
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm
|
46
|
|
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheet at December 31, 2005 and
2006
|
47
to 48
|
|
|
Consolidated
Statement of Income for the Years Ended
December 31, 2004, 2005, and 2006
|
49
|
|
|
Consolidated
Statement of Stockholders' Equity for the Years Ended
December 31, 2004, 2005, and 2006
|
50
|
|
|
Consolidated
Statement of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December
31, 2004, 2005, and 2006
|
51
to 52
|
|
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
53
to 83
|
|
|
(2) Schedules: |
|
|
|
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on
Financial Statement Schedule
|
84
|
|
|
Schedule
II –
Valuation
and Qualifying Accounts
|
85
|
Schedules
not listed above have been omitted because the information required to be set
forth therein is not applicable or is shown in the financial statements and
note
thereto.
|
|
The
exhibits listed on the Index to Exhibits at page 86 are filed as
exhibits
or incorporated by reference to this Annual Report on Form
10-K.
|
|
(c)
|
Financial
Statements of Unconsolidated Subsidiaries and
Affiliates
|
Not
Applicable.
REPORT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board
of
Directors and Stockholders
Diodes
Incorporated and Subsidiaries
We
have
audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Diodes Incorporated
and
Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 and the related consolidated
statements of income, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the
years
in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006. These consolidated
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated
financial statements based on our audits.
We
conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that
we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. An
audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the consolidated financial statements, assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that
our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In
our
opinion, the consolidated
financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial position of Diodes Incorporated and
Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the consolidated results
of
its operations and cash flows for each of the years in the three year period
ended December 31, 2006, in conformity with accepted
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
As
discussed in Notes 1 and 13 to the consolidated financial statements, effective
January 1, 2006, the Company changed its method of accounting for share-based
payment arrangements to conform to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 123(R), Share-Based
Payment.
We
also
have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of Diodes Incorporated
and
Subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006,
based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework
issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission,
and our
report dated February 28, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion on
management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control
over financial reporting and an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness
of the
Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
/s/
Moss
Adams LLP
MOSS
ADAMS LLP
Los
Angeles, California
February
28, 2007
DIODES
INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
December
31,
|
|
2005
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
73,288,000
|
|
$
|
48,888,000
|
|
Short-term
investments
|
|
|
40,348,000
|
|
|
291,008,000
|
|
Total
cash and short-term investments
|
|
|
113,636,000
|
|
|
339,896,000
|
|
Accounts
receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade
customers
|
|
|
48,348,000
|
|
|
72,175,000
|
|
Related
parties
|
|
|
6,804,000
|
|
|
6,147,000
|
|
|
|
|
55,152,000
|
|
|
78,322,000
|
|
Allowance
for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(534,000
|
)
|
|
(617,000
|
)
|
Accounts
receivable, net of allowances
|
|
|
54,618,000
|
|
|
77,705,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
24,611,000
|
|
|
48,202,000
|
|
Deferred
income taxes, current
|
|
|
2,541,000
|
|
|
4,650,000
|
|
Prepaid
expenses and other
|
|
|
5,326,000
|
|
|
8,393,000
|
|
Total
current assets
|
|
|
200,732,000
|
|
|
478,846,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROPERTY,
PLANT AND EQUIPMENT,
net
|
|
|
68,930,000
|
|
|
95,469,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEFERRED
INCOME TAXES, non-current
|
|
|
8,466,000
|
|
|
5,428,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
investment
|
|
|
5,872,000
|
|
|
-
|
|
Intangible
assets, net
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
10,669,000
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
5,090,000
|
|
|
25,030,000
|
|
Other
|
|
|
425,000
|
|
|
6,697,000
|
|
Total
assets
|
|
$
|
289,515,000
|
|
$
|
622,139,000
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
DIODES
INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS (Continued)
December
31,
|
|
2005
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Line
of credit
|
|
$
|
3,000,000
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade
|
|
|
18,619,000
|
|
|
40,029,000
|
|
Related
parties
|
|
|
7,921,000
|
|
|
12,120,000
|
|
Accrued
liabilities
|
|
|
18,312,000
|
|
|
24,967,000
|
|
Income
tax payable
|
|
|
1,470,000
|
|
|
3,433,000
|
|
Current
portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
4,621,000
|
|
|
2,802,000
|
|
Current
portion of capital lease obligations
|
|
|
138,000
|
|
|
141,000
|
|
Total
current liabilities
|
|
|
54,081,000
|
|
|
83,492,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LONG-TERM
DEBT,
net of current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.25%
convertible senior notes due 2026
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
230,000,000
|
|
Others
|
|
|
4,865,000
|
|
|
7,115,000
|
|
CAPITAL
LEASE OBLIGATIONS,
net of current portion
|
|
|
1,618,000
|
|
|
1,477,000
|
|
OTHER
LONG TERM LIABILITIES
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
1,101,000
|
|
MINORITY
INTEREST IN JOINT VENTURE
|
|
|
3,477,000
|
|
|
4,787,000
|
|
Total
Liabilities
|
|
|
64,041,000
|
|
|
327,972,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS'
EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
stock - par value $1.00 per share;
1,000,000
shares authorized; no shares issued or outstanding
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
Common
stock - par value $0.66 2/3 per share;
70,000,000
shares authorized; 25,258,119 and 25,961,267
issued
at 2005 and 2006, respectively
|
|
|
16,839,000
|
|
|
17,308,000
|
|
Additional
paid-in capital
|
|
|
94,664,000
|
|
|
113,449,000
|
|
Retained
earnings
|
|
|
114,659,000
|
|
|
162,802,000
|
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive gain (loss)
|
|
|
(688,000
|
)
|
|
608,000
|
|
Total
stockholders' equity
|
|
|
225,474,000
|
|
|
294,167,000
|
|
Total
liabilities and stockholders' equity
|
|
$
|
289,515,000
|
|
$
|
622,139,000
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
DIODES
INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME
Years
ended December 31,
|
|
2004
|
|
2005
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET
SALES
|
|
$
|
185,703,000
|
|
$
|
214,765,000
|
|
$
|
343,308,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COST
OF GOODS SOLD
|
|
|
124,968,000
|
|
|
140,388,000
|
|
|
229,416,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
profit
|
|
|
60,735,000
|
|
|
74,377,000
|
|
|
113,892,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING
EXPENSES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling,
general and administrative
|
|
|
23,503,000
|
|
|
30,285,000
|
|
|
47,945,000
|
|
Research
and development
|
|
|
3,422,000
|
|
|
3,713,000
|
|
|
8,317,000
|
|
Loss
(gain) on fixed assets
|
|
|
14,000
|
|
|
(102,000
|
)
|
|
152,000
|
|
Total
operating expenses
|
|
|
26,939,000
|
|
|
33,896,000
|
|
|
56,414,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
from operations
|
|
|
33,796,000
|
|
|
40,481,000
|
|
|
57,478,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER
INCOME (EXPENSES)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
income (expense), net
|
|
|
(637,000
|
)
|
|
221,000
|
|
|
5,117,000
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(418,000
|
)
|
|
406,000
|
|
|
(1,474,000
|
)
|
Total
other income (expenses)
|
|
|
(1,055,000
|
)
|
|
627,000
|
|
|
3,643,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
before income taxes
and
minority interest
|
|
|
32,741,000
|
|
|
41,108,000
|
|
|
61,121,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME
TAX PROVISION
|
|
|
(6,514,000
|
)
|
|
|