Form S-3
Table of Contents

AS FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ON JUNE 25, 2007

REGISTRATION NO. 333-            

 


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 


Form S-3

Registration Statement

Under

The Securities Act of 1933

 


Public Storage

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

 

Maryland   95-3551121

(State or Other Jurisdiction

of Incorporation or Organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

701 Western Avenue

Glendale, California 91201-2397

(818) 244-8080

(Address, Including Zip Code, and Telephone Number, Including Area Code, of Registrant’s Principal Executive Offices)

Ronald L. Havner, Jr.

President & Chief Executive Officer

Public Storage

701 Western Avenue

Glendale, California 91201-2397

(818) 244-8080

(Name, Address, Including Zip Code, and Telephone Number, Including Area Code, of Agent for Service)

Copies to:

 

Stephanie Heim, Esq.   James E. Showen, Esq.
Public Storage   Kevin L. Vold, Esq.
701 Western Avenue   Hogan & Hartson L.L.P.
Glendale, California 91201-2397   555 Thirteenth Street, N.W.
(818) 244-8080   Washington, D.C. 20004
  (202) 637-5600

APPROXIMATE DATE OF COMMENCEMENT OF PROPOSED SALE TO THE PUBLIC:  From time to time after the effective date of this Registration Statement.

If the only securities being registered on this Form are being offered pursuant to dividend or interest reinvestment plans, please check the following box.  ¨

If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, other than securities offered only in connection with dividend or interest reinvestment plans, check the following box.  x

If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.  ¨                    

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.  ¨                    

If this Form is a registration statement pursuant to General Instruction I.D. or a post-effective amendment thereto that shall become effective upon filing with the Commission pursuant to Rule 462(e) under the Securities Act, check the following box.  x

If this Form is a post-effective amendment to a registration statement pursuant to General Instruction I.D. filed to register additional securities or additional classes of securities pursuant to Rule 413(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box.  ¨

CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE

 

   

Title of Each Class of

Securities to be Registered

  Amount
to be
Registered
    Proposed
Maximum
Offering Price
Per Unit
    Proposed
Maximum
Offering Price
    Amount of
Registration
Fee
 

Common Shares of Beneficial Interest, $.10 par value per share

                       

Preferred Shares of Beneficial Interest, $.01 par value per share

                       

Equity Shares of Beneficial Interest, $.01 par value per share

                       

Depositary Shares Representing Interests in Preferred Shares or Equity Shares (2)

    (1)     (1)     (1)     (1)

Warrants

                       

Debt Securities

                       

Units (3)

       
   
(1) An indeterminate aggregate initial offering price or number of the securities of each identified class is being registered as may from time to time be offered at indeterminate prices. Separate consideration may or may not be received for securities that are issuable on exercise, conversion or exchange of other securities or that are represented by depositary shares. In accordance with Rules 456(b) and 457(r), the Registrant is paying a registration fee of $15,350 at this time to register $500,000,000 of securities and deferring payment of any other registration fees. The registration fee amount paid includes $1,070 that has already been paid with respect to $10,000,000 of securities that were previously registered by the Registrant’s predecessor, Public Storage, Inc., on Registration Statement No. 333-136139, and were not sold thereunder. Accordingly, the Registrant is paying $14,280 concurrently in connection with the filing of this Registration Statement.
(2) Each depositary share will be issued under a deposit agreement, will represent a specified interest in a preferred share or equity share and will be evidenced by a depositary receipt.
(3) Each unit will be issued under a unit agreement or indenture and will represent an interest in two or more debt securities, or warrants, which may or may not be separable from one another.

 



Table of Contents

Prospectus

Public Storage

By this prospectus, we may offer—

Common Shares of Beneficial Interest

Preferred Shares of Beneficial Interest

Equity Shares of Beneficial Interest

Depositary Shares

Warrants

Debt Securities

We may offer and sell these securities to or through one or more underwriters, dealers and agents, or directly to purchasers, on a delayed or continuous basis.

We will provide the specific terms of any offered securities in supplements to this prospectus and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. You should read this prospectus and the supplements carefully before you invest.

Our common shares of beneficial interest are listed and traded on the New York Stock Exchange and the Pacific Exchange under the symbol “PSA.”

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved the securities to be issued under this prospectus or determined if this prospectus is accurate or adequate. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

June 25, 2007


Table of Contents

You should rely only on the information contained in or incorporated by reference in this prospectus and any accompanying prospectus supplement. We have not authorized anyone to provide you with different information. We are not making an offer to sell these securities in any state where the offer is not permitted. The information contained in or incorporated by reference in this prospectus is accurate only as of the date on the front of this prospectus. Our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects may have changed since that date.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

ABOUT THIS PROSPECTUS

   1

WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

   1

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

   3

THE COMPANY

   4

USE OF PROCEEDS

   4

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

   4

DESCRIPTION OF COMMON SHARES

   5

DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED SHARES

   6

Outstanding Preferred Shares

   6

Future Series of Preferred Shares

   6

DESCRIPTION OF EQUITY SHARES

   11

Outstanding Series of Equity Shares

   11

Future Series of Equity Shares

   11

OWNERSHIP LIMITATIONS

   14

DESCRIPTION OF THE DEPOSITARY SHARES

   17

Distributions

   17

Liquidation Rights

   17

Redemption

   17

Conversion

   17

Voting

   18

Withdrawal of Preferred Shares or Equity Shares

   18

Amendment and Termination of Deposit Agreement

   18

Charges of Depositary

   18

Miscellaneous

   19

Resignation and Removal of Depositary

   19

DESCRIPTION OF WARRANTS

   20

DESCRIPTION OF DEBT SECURITIES

   21

General Terms of the Indenture

   21

Senior Debt Securities

   22

Subordinated Debt Securities

   22

Conversion or Exchange Rights

   22

Consolidation, Merger or Sale

   23

Events of Default

   23

Registered Global Securities

   24

Discharge, Defeasance and Covenant Defeasance

   26

Modification of the Indenture

   27

Concerning the Trustee

   28

No Individual Liability of Incorporators, Shareholders, Officers or Trustees

   28

Governing Law

   28

 

i


Table of Contents

MATERIAL U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES

   29

LEGAL OPINIONS

   51

EXPERTS

   51

SHURGARD’S MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

   51

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF SHURGARD STORAGE CENTERS, INC. AND SCHURGARD STORAGE CENTERS SCA

   F-1

 

ii


Table of Contents

ABOUT THIS PROSPECTUS

This prospectus is part of a registration statement that we filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission using a “shelf” registration process. Under this shelf process, we may sell from time to time an unlimited amount of our common shares of beneficial interest, preferred shares of beneficial interest, equity shares of beneficial interest, depositary shares, warrants and debt securities, in any combination. This prospectus provides a general description of the securities that we may offer. Each time we offer any of the types of securities described in this prospectus, we will prepare and distribute a prospectus supplement that will contain a description of the specific terms of the securities being offered and of the offering. The prospectus supplement also may also supplement the information contained in this prospectus. You should read both this prospectus and the applicable prospectus supplement, together with the additional information described under the heading “Where You Can Find More Information,” before purchasing any securities.

Unless otherwise indicated or unless the context requires otherwise, all references in this prospectus to “the Company,” “we,” “us,” “our” and similar references mean Public Storage and its subsidiaries.

WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

We are subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and are required to file annual, quarterly and special reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). You may read and copy any of these documents at the SEC public reference rooms at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. You may telephone the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on SEC public reference facilities. The SEC also maintains a website at http://www.sec.gov that contains the reports, proxy and information statements and other information that we and other registrants file electronically with the SEC. You also can inspect reports and other information we file at the offices of the New York Stock Exchange, 20 Broad Street, New York, New York 10005, and the Pacific Exchange, 301 Pine Street, San Francisco, California 94104.

This prospectus is a part of a registration statement on Form S-3 filed with the SEC to register offers and sales of the securities described in this prospectus under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The registration statement contains additional information about us and the securities. You may obtain the registration statement and its exhibits from the SEC as indicated above or from us.

The SEC allows us to provide information about our business and other important information to you by “incorporating by reference” the information we file with the SEC, which means that we can disclose that information to you by referring in this prospectus to the documents we file with the SEC. Under SEC regulations, any statement contained in a document incorporated by reference in this prospectus is automatically updated and superseded by any information contained in this prospectus, or in any subsequently filed document of the types described below.

We incorporate into this prospectus by reference the following documents filed with the SEC by us or our predecessor registrant, Public Storage, Inc., each of which should be considered an important part of this prospectus:

 

SEC Filing

  

Period Covered or Date of Filing

Annual Report on Form 10-K

  

Year ended December 31, 2006 (filed by Public Storage, Inc. on March 1, 2007, amended on March 12, 2007)

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

  

Period ended March 31, 2007 (filed by Public Storage, Inc. on May 10, 2007)

 

1


Table of Contents

SEC Filing

  

Period Covered or Date of Filing

Current Reports on Form 8-K

  

Filed by Public Storage, Inc. on January 5, 2007; February 28, 2007; March 16, 2007; April 2, 2007; May 2, 2007; and May 4, 2007; and filed by Public Storage on June 4, 2007 (and as amended on June 6, 2007) and June 6, 2007.

Description of our common, preferred and equity shares of beneficial interest contained in our Current Report on Form 8-K, as supplemented by the description contained in this prospectus

  

Filed by Public Storage on June 6, 2007

All subsequent documents filed by us under Sections 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934 (other than those “furnished” pursuant to Item 2.02 or Item 7.01 of Form 8-K or other information furnished to the SEC)

  

After the date of this prospectus and before the termination of the offering

You may request a copy of each of our filings at no cost, by writing or telephoning us at the following address, telephone or facsimile number:

Investor Services Department

Public Storage

701 Western Avenue

Glendale, California 91201-2397

  Telephone: (800) 421-2856
    (818) 244-8080
  Facsimile: (818) 241-0627

Exhibits to a document will not be provided unless they are specifically incorporated by reference in that document.

 

2


Table of Contents

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This prospectus includes or incorporates by reference forward-looking statements, including those identified by the words “expects,” “believes,” “anticipates,” “should,” “estimates,” “may,” “will,” “seeks,” “intends,” “plans,” “pro forma,” or the negative of these words and phrases or similar expressions that convey the uncertainty of future events or outcomes. Discussions of strategy, plans or intentions also include forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties which may cause our actual results to differ significantly from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements. Factors that may impact future results and performance are described in Public Storage, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 and Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007. These risks include the following:

 

   

risks related to the merger with Shurgard, including difficulties that may be encountered in integrating Public Storage and Shurgard, loss of personnel as a result of the merger, the impact of the merger on occupancy and rental rates, the inability to realize or delays in realizing expected results from the merger, unanticipated operating costs resulting from the merger and risks associated with international operations;

 

   

changes in the general economic conditions and in the markets in which Public Storage operates;

 

   

the impact of competition from new and existing self-storage and commercial facilities which could impact rents and occupancy levels at our facilities;

 

   

our ability to evaluate, finance and integrate acquired and developed properties into our existing operations and to fill up those properties, which could adversely affect our profitability;

 

   

the impact of the regulatory environment as well as national, state and local laws and regulations, including, without limitation, those governing real estate investment trusts; which could increase our expenses and reduce cash available for distribution;

 

   

consumers’ failure to accept the containerized storage concept;

 

   

difficulties in raising capital at reasonable rates, which would impede our ability to grow;

 

   

delays in the development process; and

 

   

economic uncertainty due to the impact of war or terrorism.

These factors, as well as changes in the real estate markets and the general economy, could cause future events and actual results to differ materially from those set forth or contemplated in the forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information or otherwise. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking events discussed in this prospectus or in the incorporated documents might not occur and actual results could be substantially different than expected.

 

3


Table of Contents

THE COMPANY

We are a fully integrated, self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust, or REIT, that primarily acquires, develops, owns and operates storage facilities. Our storage properties are located in 38 states and seven Western European nations. As of March 31, 2007, we had interests in 2,005 storage facilities with approximately 126 million net rentable square feet in the United States and 168 storage facilities with approximately 9 million net rentable square feet in Europe.

We elected to be taxed as a REIT beginning with our 1981 taxable year. So long as we continue to qualify as a REIT, we will not be taxed, with certain limited exceptions, on the net income that we distribute currently to our shareholders. We were incorporated in California in 1980 and reorganized as a Maryland real estate investment trust in June 2007. Our principal executive offices are located at 701 Western Avenue, Glendale, California 91201-2349. Our telephone number is (818) 244-8080.

USE OF PROCEEDS

Unless otherwise described in the applicable prospectus supplement, we intend to use the net proceeds from the sale of the securities described in this prospectus to make investments in self-storage facilities, including development, interests in partnerships and other entities and mortgage loans and for general corporate purposes, including repayment of debt and the redemption of outstanding securities. Pending application, we may invest the net proceeds in short-term, interest bearing securities.

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

We compute our ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges and preferred distributions by dividing our earnings by the sum of our fixed charges and preferred shares and preferred unit distributions, including the impact of EITF Topic D-42 described below. We compute our ratio of earnings to fixed charges by dividing our earnings by our fixed charges. Earnings consists of net income before interest expense and minority interests that have fixed charges, and excludes discontinued operations for all periods presented.

 

     Three Months
Ended March 31,
   Year Ended December 31,
     2007    2006    2006    2005    2004    2003    2002

Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges and preferred distributions, including the impact of EITF Topic D-42 (a)

   0.96x    2.32x    1.22x    2.27x    1.96x    1.90x    1.83x

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges

   4.48x    53.51x    10.26x    42.91x    91.03x    49.95x    34.15x

(a) Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Topic D-42, “The Effect on the Calculation of Earnings per Share for the Redemption or the Induced Conversion of Preferred Stock” provides, among other things, that any excess of (1) the fair value of the consideration transferred to the holders of preferred stock redeemed over (2) the carrying amount of the preferred stock should be subtracted from net earnings to determine net earnings available to common shareholders in the calculation of earnings per share. At the July 31, 2003 meeting of the EITF, the Securities and Exchange Commission Observer clarified that for purposes of applying EITF Topic D-42, the carrying amount of the preferred stock should be reduced by the issuance costs of the preferred stock, regardless of where in the stockholders’ equity section those costs were initially classified on issuance. This ratio reflects the SEC Observer’s clarification.

 

4


Table of Contents

DESCRIPTION OF COMMON SHARES

We are authorized to issue up to 650,000,000 common shares of beneficial interest, par value $0.10 per share. At June 20, 2007, we had outstanding 170,506,805 common shares (excluding common shares issuable upon conversion of convertible shares of beneficial interest and common shares subject to options).

The following description of our common shares sets forth certain general terms and provisions of our common shares to which any prospectus supplement may relate, including a prospectus supplement providing that common shares will be issuable upon conversion of preferred shares of beneficial interest or equity shares of beneficial interest or upon the exercise of warrants. The statements below describing our common shares are in all respects subject to and qualified in their entirety by reference to the applicable provisions of our declaration of trust and bylaws.

Holders of our common shares will be entitled to receive distributions when, as and if declared by our board of trustees, out of funds legally available for distribution. If we fail to pay distributions on our outstanding preferred shares of beneficial interest, generally we may not pay distributions on or repurchase our common shares. If we were to liquidate, dissolve or wind up our affairs, holders of common shares will be entitled to share equally and ratably in any assets available for distribution to them, after payment or provision for payment of our debts and other liabilities and the preferential amounts owing with respect to any of our outstanding preferred shares. Holders of common shares have no preemptive rights, which means they have no right to acquire any additional common shares that we may issue at a later date. See “Description of Preferred Shares.”

The holders of our common shares are entitled to cast one vote for each share on all matters presented to our holders for a vote. Our declaration of trust permits cumulative voting for the election of trustees. Cumulative voting means that each holder of our common shares is entitled to cast as many votes as there are trustees to be elected multiplied by the number of common shares registered in his or her name. A holder of our common shares may cumulate the votes for trustees by casting all of the votes for one candidate or by distributing the votes among as many candidates as he or she chooses. The common shares will be, when issued, fully paid and nonassessable.

The rights, preferences and privileges of holders of our common shares are subject to, and may be adversely affected by, the rights of the holders of shares of any series of our preferred shares or equity shares of beneficial interest which are outstanding or which we may designate and issue in the future. See “Description of Preferred Shares” and “Description of Equity Shares.”

 

5


Table of Contents

DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED SHARES

We are authorized to issue up to 100,000,000 preferred shares of beneficial interest, par value $0.01 per share. At June 20, 2007, we had outstanding 1,732,600 preferred shares and had reserved for issuance an additional 13,000 preferred shares. The Declaration of Trust provides that preferred shares may be issued from time to time in one or more series and gives our board of trustees broad authority to fix the distribution and distribution rights, conversion and voting rights, if any, redemption provisions and liquidation preferences of each series of Preferred Shares. Holders of preferred shares have no preemptive rights. The preferred shares will be, when issued, fully paid and nonassessable.

Although the issuance of preferred shares with special voting rights could be used to deter attempts to obtain control of us in transactions not approved by our board of trustees, we have no present intention to issue shares for that purpose.

Outstanding Preferred Shares

At June 20, 2007, we had outstanding 17 series of preferred shares and had reserved for issuance, upon conversion of preferred units in one of our operating partnerships, two additional series. Each series (1) has a stated value of $25.00 per share or depositary share as applicable, (2) provides for cumulative quarterly distributions calculated as a percentage of the stated value (ranging from 6.125% to 7.500% per year) in preference to the holders of common shares and any other equity shares ranking junior to such preferred shares as to payment of distributions, and (3) is subject to redemption after a specified date, in whole or in part, at our option at a cash redemption price of $25.00 per share or depositary share as applicable, plus accrued and unpaid distributions.

If we voluntarily or involuntarily liquidate, dissolve or wind up, the holders of our outstanding preferred shares will be entitled to receive out of our assets available for distribution to shareholders, before any assets are distributed to holders of our common shares or any other shares of beneficial interest ranking junior to our outstanding preferred shares, liquidating distributions equal to $25 per share or depositary share, plus all accrued and unpaid distributions.

Except as expressly required by law and in certain other limited circumstances, holders of our outstanding preferred shares are not entitled to vote. Our board of trustees will not, without the consent of holders of at least 66 2/3% of the outstanding preferred shares, voting as a single class, authorize another class of shares senior to our preferred shares.

Future Series of Preferred Shares

Below is a description of some general terms and provisions of our preferred shares which may be specified in a prospectus supplement. The statements below describing our preferred shares are in all respects subject to and qualified in their entirety by reference to the applicable provisions of our declaration of trust (including the applicable form of articles supplementary) and bylaws.

You should read the prospectus supplement relating to our preferred shares being offered for specific terms, including:

(1) the title and stated value of our preferred shares;

(2) the number of preferred shares being offered, the liquidation preference per share and the offering price of our preferred shares;

(3) the distribution rate, period and payment date or method of calculation applicable to our preferred shares;

 

6


Table of Contents

(4) the date from which distributions on our preferred shares accumulates, if applicable;

(5) the provision for a sinking fund, if any, for our preferred shares;

(6) the provision for redemption, if applicable, of our preferred shares;

(7) any listing of our preferred shares on any securities exchange;

(8) the terms and conditions, if applicable, upon which our preferred shares will be convertible into common shares, including the conversion price (or manner of calculation);

(9) the voting rights, if any, of our preferred shares;

(10) any other specific terms, preferences, rights, limitations or restrictions of our preferred shares;

(11) the relative ranking and preferences of our preferred shares as to distribution rights and rights upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of our affairs; and

(12) any limitations on issuance of any series of preferred shares ranking senior to or on a parity with the series of preferred shares as to distribution rights and rights upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of our affairs.

Ranking.    The ranking of our preferred shares will be set forth in the applicable prospectus supplement. Unless otherwise specified in the applicable prospectus supplement, our preferred shares will, with respect to distribution rights and rights upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of our affairs, rank:

(1) senior to the common shares, any additional class of common shares, existing and future equity shares and any future series of preferred shares ranking junior to our preferred shares;

(2) on a parity with all preferred shares previously issued by us the terms of which specifically provide that the preferred shares rank on a parity with the preferred shares being offered; and

(3) junior to all preferred shares previously issued by us the terms of which specifically provide that the preferred shares rank senior to the preferred shares being offered.

Distributions.    Holders of preferred shares of a particular series are entitled to receive, when, as and if declared by our board of trustees, out of our assets legally available for payment, cash distributions at the respective rates and on the respective dates as set forth in the articles supplementary relating to such series. Each distribution will be payable to holders of record as they appear on our share transfer books on the record dates fixed by our board of trustees.

Distributions on any series of the preferred shares being offered may be cumulative or non-cumulative, as provided in the applicable prospectus supplement. Distributions, if cumulative, will be cumulative from and after the date set forth in the applicable prospectus supplement. Any distribution made on shares of a series of cumulative preferred shares will first be credited against the earliest accrued but unpaid distribution due with respect to shares of the series which remains payable. If our board of trustees fails to declare a distribution on a distribution payment date on any series of the preferred shares for which distributions are non-cumulative, the holders of the series of the preferred shares will have no right to receive a distribution in respect of the distribution period ending on that distribution payment date, and we will have no obligation to pay the distribution accrued for the period, whether or not distributions on that series are declared payable on any future distribution payment date.

No distributions (other than in common shares or other equity shares ranking junior to the preferred shares of any series as to distributions and upon liquidation) will be declared or paid or set aside for payment (nor will any other distribution be declared or made upon our common shares, or any of our other equity shares ranking junior to or on a parity with the preferred shares of the series as to distributions or upon liquidation), nor will any common shares or any other of our equity shares ranking junior to or on a parity with the preferred shares of the series as to distributions or upon liquidation be redeemed, purchased or otherwise acquired for any consideration (or any moneys be paid to or made available for a sinking fund for the redemption of any shares) by us (except

 

7


Table of Contents

by conversion into or exchange for our other equity shares ranking junior to the preferred shares of the series as to distributions and upon liquidation) unless:

(1) if the series of preferred shares has a cumulative distribution, full cumulative distributions on the preferred shares of the series have been or contemporaneously are declared and paid or declared and a sum set apart for payment for all past distribution periods and the then current distribution period; and

(2) if the series of preferred shares does not have a cumulative distribution, full distributions on the preferred shares of the series have been or contemporaneously are declared and paid or declared and a sum set apart for payment for the then current distribution period.

Any distribution payment made on shares of a series of cumulative preferred shares being offered will first be credited against the earliest accrued but unpaid distribution due with respect to shares of the series which remains payable.

Redemption.    The preferred shares will be subject to mandatory redemption or redemption at our option, in whole or in part, in each case to the extent set forth in the prospectus supplement relating to the series. The preferred shares also will be subject to redemption at our option, in whole or in part, if the board of trustees determines in good faith that such redemption is necessary to maintain our status as a REIT for tax purposes.

The prospectus supplement relating to a series of preferred shares being offered that is subject to mandatory redemption will specify the number of shares of that series that will be redeemed by us in each year commencing after a date to be specified, at a redemption price per share to be specified, together with an amount equal to all accrued and unpaid distributions thereon (which will not, if shares of that series do not have a cumulative distribution, include any accumulation in respect of unpaid distributions for prior distribution periods) to the date of redemption. The redemption price may be payable in cash, securities or other property, as specified in the applicable prospectus supplement.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, no preferred shares of any series being offered will be redeemed and we will not purchase or otherwise acquire directly or indirectly any preferred shares of that series (except by conversion into or exchange for equity shares of us ranking junior to the preferred shares of that series as to distributions and upon liquidation) unless all outstanding preferred shares of that series are simultaneously redeemed unless, in each case:

(1) if that series of preferred shares has a cumulative distribution, full cumulative distributions on the preferred shares of that series will have been or contemporaneously are declared and paid or declared and a sum sufficient for payment for all past distribution periods and the then current distribution period is set apart; and

(2) if that series of preferred shares does not have a cumulative distribution, full distributions on the preferred shares of that series have been or contemporaneously are declared and paid or declared and a sum sufficient for payment for the then current distribution period is set apart; provided, however, that we may acquire preferred shares of the series under a purchase or exchange offer made on the same terms to holders of all outstanding preferred shares of the series.

If fewer than all of the outstanding preferred shares of any series being offered are to be redeemed, the number of shares to be redeemed will be determined by us and these shares may be redeemed pro rata from the holders of record of these shares in proportion to the number of these shares held by such holders (with adjustments to avoid redemption of fractional shares) or any other equitable method determined by us.

 

8


Table of Contents

Notice of redemption will be mailed at least 30 days but not more than 60 days before the redemption date to each holder of record of preferred shares of any series to be redeemed at the address shown on our share transfer books. Each notice will state:

(1) the redemption date;

(2) the number of shares and series of our preferred shares to be redeemed;

(3) the redemption price;

(4) the place or places where certificates for such preferred shares are to be surrendered for payment of the redemption price; and

(5) that distributions on our preferred shares to be redeemed will cease to accrue on the redemption date.

If fewer than all our preferred shares of any series are to be redeemed, the notice mailed to each holder will also specify the number of preferred shares to be redeemed from the holder and, upon redemption, a new certificate will be issued representing the unredeemed shares without cost to the holder. To facilitate the redemption of preferred shares, our board of trustees may fix a record date for the determination of preferred shares to be redeemed. The record date may not be less than 30 or more than 60 days before the date fixed for redemption.

If notice has been given as provided above, unless we default in providing funds for the payment of the redemption price on that date, then from and after the redemption date all distributions on our preferred shares called for redemption will cease. From and after the redemption date, unless we default, all rights of the holders of our preferred shares of such series, except the right to receive the redemption price (but without interest), will cease.

Subject to applicable law and the limitation on purchases when distributions on preferred shares are in arrears, we may, at any time and from time to time, purchase any preferred shares in the open market, by tender or by private agreement.

Liquidation Preference.    If we voluntarily or involuntarily liquidate, dissolve or wind-up our affairs, then, before we make any distribution or payment to the holders of any common shares or any other class or series of shares of beneficial interest ranking junior to our preferred shares in the distribution of assets upon our liquidation, dissolution or winding up, the holders of each series of preferred shares will be entitled to receive out of our assets legally available for distribution to shareholders liquidating distributions in the amount of the liquidation preference per share (set forth in the applicable articles supplementary relating to such series), plus an amount equal to all accrued and unpaid distributions. After payment of the full amount of the liquidating distributions to which they are entitled, the holders of preferred shares will have no right or claim to any of our remaining assets. In the event that, upon the voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding up, our legally available assets are insufficient to pay the amount of the liquidating distributions on all outstanding preferred shares of any series and the corresponding amounts payable on all shares of other classes or series of shares of beneficial interest ranking on a parity with our preferred shares in the distribution of assets upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up, then the holders of our preferred shares and all other such classes or series of shares of beneficial interest will share ratably in any distribution of assets in proportion to the full liquidating distributions to which they would otherwise be respectively entitled.

If liquidating distributions have been made in full to all holders of preferred shares, our remaining assets will be distributed among the holders of any other classes or series of shares of beneficial interest ranking junior to our preferred shares upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up, according to their respective rights and preferences and in each case according to their respective number of shares. For these purposes, our consolidation or merger with or into any other corporation, or the sale, lease, transfer or conveyance of all or substantially all of our property or business, will not be deemed to constitute a liquidation, dissolution or winding up.

 

9


Table of Contents

Voting Rights.    Holders of our preferred shares have no voting rights, except as set forth below or as otherwise expressly required by law or as indicated in the applicable articles supplementary.

If six quarterly distributions payable on any series of preferred shares are in default (whether or not declared or consecutive), the holders of all the series of preferred shares, voting as a single class with all other series of preferred shares upon which similar voting rights have been conferred and are exercisable, will be entitled to elect two additional trustees until all distributions in default have been paid or declared and set apart for payment.

The right to vote separately to elect trustees will, when vested, be subject, always, to the same provisions for vesting of the right to elect trustees separately in the case of future distribution defaults. At any time when the right to elect trustees separately has vested, we may, and upon the written request of the holders of record of not less than 20% of our total number of preferred shares then outstanding will, call a special meeting of shareholders for the election of trustees. In the case of the written request, a special meeting will be held within 90 days after the delivery of the request and, in either case, at the place and upon the notice provided by law and in the bylaws. However, we will not be required to call a special meeting if the request is received less than 120 days before the date fixed for the next annual meeting of shareholders, and the holders of all classes of outstanding preferred shares are offered the opportunity to elect the trustees (or fill any vacancy) at the annual meeting of shareholders. Trustees so elected will serve until the next annual meeting of shareholders or until their respective successors are elected and qualify. If, before the end of the term of any trustee so elected, a vacancy in the office of the trustee occurs, during the continuance of a default by reason of death, resignation, or disability, the vacancy will be filled for the unexpired term of the former trustee by the appointment of a new trustee by the remaining trustee or trustees so elected.

The affirmative vote or consent of the holders of at least 662/3% of the outstanding preferred shares of each series will be required to amend or repeal any provision of, or add any provision to, our Declaration of Trust, including the articles supplementary, if this action would adversely alter or change the rights, preferences or privileges of the series of preferred shares.

Our board of trustees will not, without the consent of holders of at least 662/3% of the outstanding preferred shares, voting as a single class, authorize another class of shares of beneficial interest senior to our preferred shares. No consent or approval of the holders of any series of preferred shares will be required for the issuance from authorized but unissued preferred shares of other preferred shares of any series ranking on a parity with or junior to our preferred shares in question, or senior to a series of preferred shares expressly made junior to that series of preferred shares as to payment of distributions and distribution of assets, including other preferred shares of the same series.

These voting provisions will not apply if, at or prior to the time when the act with respect to which a vote would otherwise be required is effected, all outstanding preferred shares of the series had been redeemed or called for redemption upon proper notice and sufficient funds had been deposited in trust to effect the redemption.

Conversion Rights.    The terms and conditions, if any, upon which shares of any series of preferred shares being offered are convertible into common shares will be set forth in the applicable prospectus supplement. The terms will include the number of common shares into which the preferred shares are convertible, the conversion price (or manner of calculation), the conversion period, provisions as to whether conversion will be at our option or at the option of the holders of the preferred shares or automatically upon the occurrence of certain events, the events requiring an adjustment of the conversion price and provisions affecting conversion if we redeem the preferred shares.

 

10


Table of Contents

DESCRIPTION OF EQUITY SHARES

We are authorized to issue up to 100,000,000 equity shares of beneficial interest, par value $.01 per share. At June 20, 2007, we had outstanding 4,298,284.766 equity shares (of which 8,740.766 are represented by 8,740,766 depositary shares) which rank on a parity with our common shares. Our declaration of trust provides that the equity shares may be issued from time to time in one or more series and gives the board of trustees broad authority to fix the distribution, conversion and voting rights, redemption provisions and liquidation rights of each series of equity shares. Holders of equity shares have no preemptive rights. The equity shares will be, when issued, fully paid and nonassessable.

The issuance of equity shares with special voting rights could be used to deter attempts by a single shareholder or group of shareholders to obtain control of us in transactions not approved by our board of trustees. We have no intention to issue equity shares for these purposes.

Outstanding Series of Equity Shares

At June 20, 2007, we have outstanding two series of equity shares, consisting of 8,740.766 equity shares, series A, and 4,289,544 equity shares, series AAA, each of which rank on a parity with our common shares. The equity shares, series A are represented by 8,740,766 depositary shares (each depositary share representing 1/1000 of an equity share, series A). Our equity shares, series A (1) provide for cash distributions at the rate of five times the distributions on the common share per depositary share, but not more than $2.45 per depositary share per year, (2) may be redeemed on or after March 31, 2010 at $24.50 per depositary share, (3) on liquidation receives the same per share amount allocated in respect of a common share, but not to exceed $24.50 per depositary share, (4) are convertible into common shares at the rate of one depositary share into .956 common shares if we fail to preserve our status as a REIT and (5) vote as a single class with the common shares at the rate of one-tenth of a vote per depositary share.

Our equity shares, series AAA (1) provide for cash distributions at the rate of five times the distributions on the common shares, provided that such distributions shall be neither more than $.539101563 per share per quarter nor less than the lesser of $2.15640625 per share per year or five times the dividends per common share per year, (2) are not redeemable except in certain limited circumstances (including if we determine a redemption is necessary to maintain our status as a REIT), (3) receive on our liquidation, dissolution or winding up 120% of the amount distributed per common share, (4) are not convertible into common shares except in certain limited circumstances and (5) have no voting rights.

Future Series of Equity Shares

Below is a description of some general terms and provisions of our equity shares which may be specified in a prospectus supplement. The statements below describing the equity shares are in all respects subject to and qualified in their entirety by reference to the applicable provisions of our declaration of trust (including the applicable form of articles supplementary) and bylaws.

You should read the prospectus supplement relating to the equity shares being offered for specific terms, including:

(1) the designation of that equity shares;

(2) the number of shares of that equity shares offered, the liquidation rights and the offering price of that equity shares;

(3) the distribution rate, period and payment date or method of calculation applicable to that equity shares;

(4) the provision for redemption, if applicable, of that equity shares;

 

11


Table of Contents

(5) any listing of that equity shares on any securities exchange;

(6) the terms and conditions, if applicable, upon which that equity shares will be convertible into common shares, including the conversion price (or manner of calculation);

(7) the voting rights, if any, of such equity shares;

(8) any other specific terms, rights, limitations or restrictions of such equity shares; and

(9) the relative ranking of that equity shares as to distribution rights and rights if we liquidate, dissolve or wind-up our affairs.

Ranking.    Unless otherwise specified in the applicable prospectus supplement, equity shares will, with respect to distribution rights and rights upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of our affairs, rank on a parity with the common shares.

Distributions.    Holders of equity shares of each series being offered will be entitled to receive, when, as and if declared by our board of trustees, out of our assets legally available for payment, cash distributions at the rates and on the dates set forth in the applicable prospectus supplement. Each distribution will be payable to holders of record as they appear on our share transfer books on the record dates fixed by our board of trustees. Unless otherwise specified in the applicable prospectus supplement, distributions on equity shares will be non-cumulative.

Redemption.    The equity shares will be subject to mandatory redemption or redemption at our option, in whole or in part, in each case to the extent set forth in the applicable prospectus supplement.

The prospectus supplement relating to a series of equity shares being offered that is subject to mandatory redemption will specify the number of shares of that series that we must redeem in each year commencing after a date to be specified, at a redemption price per share to be specified, together with an amount equal to all accrued and unpaid distributions (which will not, if that series does not have a cumulative distribution, include any accumulation in respect of unpaid distributions for prior distribution periods) to the date of redemption. The redemption price may be payable in cash, securities or other property, as specified in the applicable prospectus supplement.

If fewer than all of the outstanding equity shares of any series offered are to be redeemed, the number of shares to be redeemed will be determined by us and those shares may be redeemed pro rata from the holders of record of those shares in proportion to the number of those shares held by such holders (with adjustments to avoid redemption of fractional shares) or any other equitable method determined by us.

Notice of redemption will be mailed at least 30 days but not more than 60 days before the redemption date to each holder of record of equity shares of any series to be redeemed at the address shown on our share transfer books. Each notice will state:

(1) the redemption date;

(2) the number of shares and series of the equity shares to be redeemed;

(3) the redemption price;

(4) the place or places where certificates for shares of that series are to be surrendered for payment of the redemption price;

(5) that distributions on the shares to be redeemed will cease to accrue on the redemption date; and

(6) the date upon which the holder’s conversion rights, if any, as to those shares terminates.

 

12


Table of Contents

If fewer than all the shares of equity shares of any series are to be redeemed, the notice mailed to each holder will also specify the number of shares of equity shares to be redeemed from the holder and, upon redemption, a new certificate will be issued representing the unredeemed shares without cost to the holder. To facilitate the redemption of shares of equity shares, our board of trustees may fix a record date for the determination of equity shares to be redeemed. The record date may not be less than 30 or more than 60 days before the date fixed for redemption.

If notice has been given as provided above, unless we default in providing funds for the payment of the redemption price on that date, then from and after the redemption date all distributions on the equity shares called for redemption will cease. From and after the redemption date, unless we default, all rights of the holders of our equity shares, except the right to receive the redemption price (but without interest), will cease.

Liquidation Rights.    If we voluntarily or involuntarily liquidate, dissolve or wind-up our affairs, then, before we make any distribution or payment to the holders of the equity shares or any other class or series of our equity shares ranking junior to any series of preferred shares in the distribution of assets upon our liquidation, dissolution or winding up, the holders of each series of preferred shares will be entitled to receive out of our assets legally available for distribution to shareholders liquidating distributions in the amount of the liquidation preference per share, plus an amount equal to all accrued and unpaid distributions (which shall not include any accumulation in respect of unpaid distributions for prior distribution periods if the preferred shares does not have a cumulative distribution). After payment of the full amount of the liquidating distributions to which they are entitled, the holders of preferred shares will have no right or claim to any of our remaining assets.

If liquidating distributions have been made in full to all holders of preferred shares, our remaining assets will be distributed among the holders of any other classes or series of equity shares ranking junior to the preferred shares upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up, including the equity shares, according to their respective rights and in each case according to their respective number of shares. For these purposes, our consolidation or merger with or into any other corporation, or the sale, lease, transfer or conveyance of all or substantially all of our property or business, will not be deemed to constitute a liquidation, dissolution or winding up.

Unless otherwise specified in the applicable prospectus supplement, if we voluntarily or involuntarily liquidate, dissolve or wind up our affairs, holders of the equity shares will rank on a parity with the holders of the common shares, subject to any maximum or minimum distribution to holders of equity shares specified in the applicable prospectus supplement.

Voting Rights.    Unless otherwise specified in the applicable prospectus supplement, holders of the equity shares will vote with holders of the common shares.

No consent or approval of the holders of any series of equity shares will be required for the issuance from our authorized but unissued equity shares of other shares of any series of equity shares including shares of the same series of equity shares.

Conversion Rights.    The terms and conditions, if any, upon which shares of any series of equity shares being offered are convertible into common shares will be set forth in the applicable prospectus supplement. The terms will include the number of common shares into which the equity shares are convertible, the conversion price (or manner of calculation), the conversion period, provisions as to whether conversion will be at our option or at the option of the holders of the equity shares or automatically upon the occurrence of certain events, the events requiring an adjustment of the conversion price and provisions affecting conversion in the event of the redemption of the series of equity shares.

 

13


Table of Contents

OWNERSHIP LIMITATIONS

To qualify as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), our shares must be beneficially owned by 100 or more persons during at least 335 days of a taxable year of 12 months or during a proportionate part of a shorter taxable year. Also, not more than 50% of the value of our outstanding shares (after taking into account options to acquire shares) may be owned, directly, indirectly or through attribution, by five or fewer individuals (as defined in the Code to include certain entities) during the last half of a taxable year.

To maintain our qualification as a REIT, our declaration of trust provides that:

 

   

no person, other than an excepted holder or a designated investment entity (each as defined in our declaration of trust and as described below), may own directly or indirectly, or be deemed to own by virtue of the attribution provisions of the Code, more than 3%, in value or number of common shares, whichever is more restrictive, of the outstanding shares of any class or series of common shares;

 

   

no person, other than a designated investment entity or an excepted holder (each as defined in our declaration of trust and as described below), may own directly or indirectly, or be deemed to own through attribution, more than 9.9% in value or number of shares, whichever is more restrictive, of the outstanding shares of any class or series of preferred shares, or equity shares;

 

   

no excepted holder, which means certain members of the Hughes family, certain trusts established for the benefit of members of the Hughes family, certain related entities, as well as persons whose ownership of shares would cause members of the Hughes family to be deemed to own shares pursuant to application attribution rules under the Code, may own directly or indirectly common shares if, under the applicable tax attribution rules of the Code, any single excepted holder who is treated as an individual would own more than 35.66%, in value or number of shares, whichever is more restrictive, of any class or series of the outstanding common shares, any two excepted holders treated as individuals would own more than 38.66%, in value or number of shares, whichever is more restrictive, of any class or series of the outstanding common shares, any three excepted holders treated as individuals would own more than 41.66%, in value or number of shares, whichever is more restrictive, of any class or series of the outstanding common shares, any four excepted holders treated as individuals would own more than 44.66%, in value or number of shares, whichever is more restrictive, of any class or series of the outstanding common shares, or any five excepted holders treated as individuals would own more than 47.66%, in value or number of shares, whichever is more restrictive, of any class or series of the outstanding common shares;

 

   

no excepted holder, as described above, may own directly or indirectly, or be deemed to own through attribution, more than 15% in value or number of shares, whichever is more restrictive, of the outstanding shares of any class or series of equity shares; there is no special limit specifically applicable to preferred shares except the general ownership limit;

 

   

no designated investment entity may acquire or hold, directly or indirectly (or through attribution), shares in excess of the designated investment entity limit of 9.9%, in value or number of shares, whichever is more restrictive, of the outstanding shares of any class or series of common shares;

 

   

a designated investment entity may acquire or hold, directly or indirectly (or through attribution), 100% of the outstanding shares of any class or series of preferred shares or equity shares;

 

   

no person shall actually or beneficially own our shares to the extent that such ownership would result in us being “closely held” under Section 856(h) of the Code or otherwise cause us to fail to qualify as a REIT at any time; and

 

   

no person shall transfer our shares if such transfer would result in our shares being owned by fewer than 100 persons at any time.

 

14


Table of Contents

The excepted holder limit has been established in light of the fact that the Hughes family and certain related trusts and entities own approximately 27% of our common shares, and have the right to acquire additional shares up to 35.66% of our outstanding common shares. The excepted holder limit allows excepted holders, defined in our declaration of trust to include certain members of the Hughes family, certain trusts established for the benefit of members of the Hughes family and certain related entities, to own up to 47.66% of the outstanding shares of any class or series of common shares, so long as no one individual excepted holder would own in excess of 35.66% of the outstanding shares of any such class or series. We believe that the excepted holder limit will not jeopardize our status as a REIT because no five excepted holders can own more than 47.66% of any class or series of our outstanding common shares and, thus, we will be in compliance with the REIT qualification requirement prohibiting five or fewer individuals from owning more than 50% of the value of our outstanding shares.

Our declaration of trust defines a “designated investment entity” as:

1. an entity that is a pension trust that qualifies for look-through treatment under Section 856(h)(3) of the Code;

2. an entity that qualifies as a regulated investment company under Section 851 of the Code; or

3. an entity (referred to in our declaration of trust as a “qualified investment manager”) that (i) for compensation engages in the business of advising others as to the value of securities or as to the advisability of investing in, purchasing or selling securities; (ii) purchases securities in the ordinary course of its business and not with the purpose or effect of changing or influencing control of the Trust, nor in connection with or as a participant in any transaction having such purpose or effect, including any transaction subject to Rule 13d-3(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (iii) has or shares voting power and investment power under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;

so long as each beneficial owner of such entity, or in the case of a qualified investment manager holding shares solely for the benefit of its customer account holders, the individual account holders of the accounts managed by such entity, would satisfy the 3% common share or 9.9% preferred share or equity share ownership limit, as applicable, if such beneficial owner or account holder owned directly its proportionate share of the shares held by the entity.

Under our declaration of trust, the board of trustees may, in its sole and absolute discretion, exempt a shareholder that is not an individual from the 3% ownership limit for common shares, the 9.9% ownership limit for preferred and equity shares, or the ownership limit for common shares applicable to designated investment entities, if such shareholder provides information and makes representations to the board of trustees that are satisfactory to the board of trustees, in its sole and absolute discretion, to establish that such person’s ownership in excess of the applicable ownership limit would not jeopardize our qualification as a REIT. The board of trustees has granted waivers to certain persons.

Any person who acquires or attempts or intends to acquire actual/or beneficial or constructive ownership of our shares that will or may violate any of the foregoing restrictions on transferability and ownership will be required to give notice immediately to us and provide us with such other information as the board of trustees may request in order to determine the effect of such transfer on our status as a REIT. If any transfer of shares or any other event would otherwise result in any person violating the ownership limits described above, then our declaration of trust provides that (a) the transfer will be void and of no force or effect with respect to the prohibited transferee with respect to that number of shares that exceeds the ownership limits and (b) the prohibited transferee would not acquire any right or interest in the shares. The foregoing restrictions on transferability and ownership will not apply if our board of trustees determines that it is no longer in our best interests to attempt to qualify, or to continue to qualify, as a REIT.

All certificates representing our shares will bear a legend referring to the restrictions described above.

 

15


Table of Contents

Every owner of more than 5% (or such lower percentage as required by the Code or the regulations promulgated thereunder) of all classes or series of our shares, including common shares, will be required to give written notice to us within 30 days after the end of each taxable year stating the name and address of such owner, the number of shares of each class and series of shares that the owner beneficially owns and a description of the manner in which such shares are held. Each such owner shall provide to us such additional information as the board of trustees may request in order to determine the effect, if any, of such beneficial ownership on our status as a REIT and to ensure compliance with the various ownership limitations. In addition, each shareholder shall upon demand be required to provide to the board of trustees such information as the board of trustees may request, in good faith, in order to determine our status as a REIT and to comply with the requirements of any taxing authority or governmental authority or to determine such compliance.

 

16


Table of Contents

DESCRIPTION OF THE DEPOSITARY SHARES

We may, at our option, elect to offer depositary shares, each of which will represent a fractional interest in a preferred share or equity share of a specified series as described in the applicable prospectus supplement. The preferred shares or equity shares represented by the depositary shares will be deposited with Computershare Trust Company, N.A. or another depositary named in the applicable prospectus supplement, under a deposit agreement, among the depositary, the holders of the depositary receipts and us. Depositary receipts, which are certificates evidencing depositary shares, will be delivered to those persons purchasing depositary shares in the offering. The depositary will be the transfer agent, registrar and distribution disbursing agent for the depositary shares. Holders of depositary receipts agree to be bound by the deposit agreement, which requires holders to take certain actions such as filing proof of residence and paying certain charges.

The summary of terms of the depositary shares contained in this prospectus does not purport to be complete and is subject to, and qualified in its entirety by, the provisions of the deposit agreement, our declaration of trust and the form of articles supplementary for the applicable series of preferred shares or equity shares.

Distributions

The depositary will distribute all cash or other cash distributions received in respect of the series of preferred shares or equity shares represented by the depositary shares to the record holders of depositary receipts in proportion to the number of depositary shares owned by those holders on the relevant record date, which will be the same date as the record date fixed by us for the applicable series of preferred shares or equity shares. The depositary, however, will distribute only an amount as can be distributed without attributing to any depositary share a fraction of one cent with any undistributed balance added to and treated as part of the next sum received by the depositary for distribution to record holders of depositary receipts then outstanding.

In the event of a distribution other than in cash, the depositary will distribute property received by it to the record holders of depositary receipts that are entitled to receive the distribution, in proportion, as nearly as may be practicable, to the number of depositary shares owned by those holders on the relevant record date, unless the depositary determines (after consultation with us) that it is not feasible to make the distribution. If this occurs, the depositary may (with our approval) sell the property and distribute the net proceeds from that sale to those holders or adopt another method of distribution as it deems equitable and appropriate.

Liquidation Rights

If we liquidate, dissolve or wind up our affairs, whether voluntarily or involuntarily, the holders of each depositary share will be entitled to the fraction of the liquidation amount accorded each share of the applicable series of preferred shares or equity shares, as set forth in the applicable articles supplementary.

Redemption

For all cases where series of preferred shares or equity shares represented by that series of depositary shares is redeemable, those depositary shares will be redeemed from the proceeds received by the depositary resulting from the redemption, in whole or in part, of that series of preferred shares or equity shares held by the depositary. Whenever we redeem any preferred shares or equity shares held by the depositary, the depositary will redeem as of the same redemption date the number of depositary shares representing our preferred shares or equity shares so redeemed. The depositary will mail the notice of redemption promptly upon receipt of such notice from us and not less than 30 nor more than 60 days prior to the date fixed for redemption of our preferred shares or equity shares and the depositary shares to the record holders of the depositary receipts.

Conversion

If the series of preferred shares or equity shares represented by the applicable series of depositary shares is convertible into a different class of our shares, the depositary shares will be also be convertible on the terms described in the applicable prospectus supplement.

 

17


Table of Contents

Voting

Promptly upon receipt of notice of any meeting at which the holders of the series of preferred shares or equity shares represented by the applicable series of depositary shares are entitled to vote, the depositary will mail the information contained in the notice of meeting to the record holders of the depositary receipts as of the record date for that meeting. Each record holder of depositary receipts will be entitled to instruct the depositary as to the exercise of the voting rights pertaining to the number of preferred shares or equity shares represented by that record holder’s depositary shares. The depositary will then try, as far as practicable, to vote our preferred shares or equity shares represented by such depositary shares in accordance with those instructions, and we will agree to take all action which may be deemed necessary by the depositary in order to enable the depositary to do so. The depositary will not vote any of our preferred shares or equity shares to the extent that it does not receive specific instructions from the holders of depositary receipts.

Withdrawal of Preferred Shares or Equity Shares

Upon surrender of depositary receipts at the principal office of the depositary, upon payment of any unpaid amount due the depositary, and subject to the terms of the deposit agreement, the holder of the depositary shares evidenced by the depositary receipts is entitled to delivery of the number of whole preferred shares or equity shares and all money and other property, if any, represented by those depositary shares. Partial preferred shares or equity shares will not be issued. If the depositary receipts delivered by the holder evidence a number of depositary shares in excess of the number of depositary shares representing the number of whole preferred shares or equity shares to be withdrawn, the depositary will deliver to that holder at the same time a new depositary receipt evidencing the excess number of depositary shares. Holders of withdrawn preferred shares or equity shares will not be entitled to deposit those shares under the deposit agreement or to receive depositary receipts evidencing depositary shares.

Amendment and Termination of Deposit Agreement

The form of depositary receipt evidencing the depositary shares of any series and any provision of the deposit agreement may at any time be amended by agreement between the depositary and us. However, any amendment which materially and adversely alters the rights of the holders (other than any change in fees) of depositary shares of any series will not be effective unless that amendment has been approved by the holders of at least a majority of the depositary shares of that series then outstanding. No such amendment may impair the right, subject to the terms of the deposit agreement, of any owner of any depositary shares to surrender the depositary receipt evidencing those depositary shares with instructions to the depositary to deliver to the holder our preferred shares or equity shares and all money and other property, if any, represented by the depositary receipt, except in order to comply with mandatory provisions of applicable law. The deposit agreement may be terminated by the depositary or by us only if:

(1) all outstanding depositary shares have been redeemed or

(2) there has been a final distribution in respect of our preferred shares or equity shares in connection with our liquidation, dissolution or winding up and the distribution has been made to all the holders of depositary shares.

Charges of Depositary

We will pay all transfer and other taxes and governmental charges arising solely from the existence of the depositary arrangements. We will pay charges of the depositary in connection with the initial deposit of our preferred shares or equity shares and the initial issuance of the depositary shares, and redemption of our preferred shares or equity shares and all withdrawals of preferred shares or equity shares by owners of depositary shares. Holders of depositary receipts will pay transfer, income and other taxes and governmental charges and those other charges as are provided in the deposit agreement to be for their accounts. In some circumstances, the depositary may refuse to transfer depositary shares, may withhold dividends and distributions and sell the depositary shares evidenced by the depositary receipt if the charges are not paid.

 

18


Table of Contents

Miscellaneous

The depositary will forward to the holders of depositary receipts all reports and communications from us which are delivered to the depositary and which we are required to furnish to the holders of our preferred shares or equity shares. In addition, the depositary will make available for inspection by holders of depositary receipts at the principal office of the depositary, and at other places as it may from time to time deem advisable, any reports and communications received from us which are received by the depositary as the holder of preferred shares or equity shares.

Neither the depositary nor we assume any obligation or liability under the deposit agreement to holders of depositary receipts other than for its or our negligence or willful misconduct. Neither the depositary nor we will be liable if the depositary is prevented or delayed by law or any circumstance beyond its control in performing its obligations under the deposit agreement. Our obligations and those of the depositary under the deposit agreement will be limited to performance in good faith of the depositary’s duties under the deposit agreement. Neither of them will be obligated to prosecute or defend any legal proceeding in respect of any depositary shares or preferred shares or equity shares unless satisfactory indemnity is furnished. We and the depositary may rely on written advice of counsel or accountants, on information provided by holders of depositary receipts or other persons believed in good faith to be competent to give the information and on documents believed to be genuine and to have been signed or presented by the proper party or parties.

Resignation and Removal of Depositary

The depositary may resign at any time by delivering to us notice of its election to do so, and we may at any time remove the depositary. Any resignation or removal will take effect upon the appointment of a successor depositary and its acceptance of the appointment. The successor depositary must be appointed within 60 days after delivery of the notice for resignation or removal and must be a bank or trust company having its principal office in the United States of America and having a combined capital and surplus of at least $150,000,000.

 

19


Table of Contents

DESCRIPTION OF WARRANTS

We have no warrants outstanding (other than options issued under our option plan). We may issue warrants for the purchase of common shares, preferred shares, equity shares or debt securities. Warrants may be issued independently or together with any other securities offered by any prospectus supplement and may be attached to or separate from those securities. Each series of warrants will be issued under a separate warrant agreement to be entered into between a warrant agent specified in the applicable prospectus supplement and us. The warrant agent will act solely as our agent in connection with the warrants of that series and will not assume any obligation or relationship of agency or trust for or with any holders or beneficial owners of warrants. The following sets forth certain general terms and provisions of the warrants being offered. Further terms of the warrants and the applicable warrant agreement will be set forth in the applicable prospectus supplement.

The applicable prospectus supplement will describe the terms of the warrants in respect of which this prospectus is being delivered, including, where applicable, the following:

(1) the title of those warrants;

(2) the aggregate number of those warrants;

(3) the price or prices at which those warrants will be issued;

(4) the designation, number and terms of the shares of common shares, preferred shares or equity shares purchasable upon exercise of those warrants;

(5) the designation and terms of the other equity shares, if any, with which those warrants are issued and the number of those warrants issued with each share;

(6) the date, if any, on and after which those warrants and the related common shares, preferred shares or equity shares, if any, will be separately transferable;

(7) the price at which each share of common shares, preferred shares or equity shares purchasable upon exercise of those warrants may be purchased;

(8) the date on which the right to exercise those warrants will commence and the date on which that right expires;

(9) the minimum or maximum amount of those warrants which may be exercised at any one time; and

(10) any other terms of those warrants, including terms, procedures and limitations relating to the exchange and exercise of those warrants.

 

20


Table of Contents

DESCRIPTION OF DEBT SECURITIES

The following descriptions of the debt securities do not purport to be complete and are subject to and qualified in their entirety by reference to the indenture, a form of which has been filed with the SEC as an exhibit to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part. Any future supplemental indenture or similar document also will be so filed. You should read the indenture and any supplemental indenture or similar document because they, and not this description, define your rights as holder of our debt securities. All capitalized terms have the meanings specified in the indenture.

We may issue, from time to time, debt securities, in one or more series, that will consist of either our senior debt (the “Senior Debt Securities”) or our subordinated debt securities (the “Subordinated Debt Securities”). The debt securities we offer will be issued under one or more indentures between us and a trustee (the “Trustee”), which may be the same trustee. Debt securities, whether senior or subordinated, may be issued as convertible debt securities or exchangeable debt securities.

General Terms of the Indenture

The indenture does not limit the amount of debt securities that we may issue. It provides that we may issue debt securities up to the principal amount that we may authorize and may be in any currency or currency unit designated by us. Except for the limitations on consolidation, merger and sale of all or substantially all of our assets contained in the indenture, the terms of the indenture do not contain any covenants or other provisions designed to afford holders of any debt securities protection with respect to our operations, financial condition or transactions involving us.

We may issue the debt securities issued under the indenture as “discount securities,” which means they may be sold at a discount below their stated principal amount. These debt securities, as well as other debt securities that are not issued at a discount, may, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, be treated as if they were issued with “original issue discount,” or “OID,” because of interest payment and other characteristics. Special U.S. federal income tax considerations applicable to debt securities issued with original issue discount will be described in more detail in any applicable prospectus supplement.

The applicable prospectus supplement for a series of debt securities that we issue will describe, among other things, the following terms of the offered debt securities:

 

   

the title;

 

   

the aggregate principal amount;

 

   

whether issued in fully registered form without coupons or in a form registered as to principal only with coupons or in bearer form with coupons;

 

   

whether issued in the form of one or more global securities and whether all or a portion of the principal amount of the debt securities is represented thereby;

 

   

the price or prices at which the debt securities will be issued;

 

   

the date or dates on which principal is payable;

 

   

the place or places where and the manner in which principal, premium or interest will be payable and the place or places where the debt securities may be presented for transfer and, if applicable, conversion or exchange;

 

   

interest rates, and the dates from which interest, if any, will accrue, and the dates when interest is payable;

 

   

the right, if any, to extend the interest payment periods and the duration of the extensions;

 

   

our rights or obligations to redeem or purchase the debt securities, including sinking fund or partial redemption payments;

 

21


Table of Contents
   

conversion or exchange provisions, if any, including conversion or exchange prices or rates and adjustments thereto;

 

   

the currency or currencies of payment of principal or interest;

 

   

the terms applicable to any debt securities issued at a discount from their stated principal amount;

 

   

the terms, if any, pursuant to which any debt securities will be subordinate to any of our other debt;

 

   

if the amount of payments of principal or interest is to be determined by reference to an index or formula, or based on a coin or currency other than that in which the debt securities are stated to be payable, the manner in which these amounts are determined and the calculation agent, if any, with respect thereto;

 

   

if other than the entire principal amount of the debt securities when issued, the portion of the principal amount payable upon acceleration of maturity, and the terms and conditions of any acceleration;

 

   

if applicable, covenants affording holders of debt protection with respect to our operations, financial condition or transactions involving us; and

 

   

any other specific terms of any debt securities.

The applicable prospectus supplement will set forth material U.S. federal income tax considerations for holders of any debt securities and the securities exchange or quotation system on which any debt securities are listed or quoted, if any.

Debt securities issued by us will be structurally subordinated to all indebtedness and other liabilities of our subsidiaries, except to the extent any such subsidiary guarantees or is otherwise obligated to make payment on such debt securities.

Unless otherwise provided in the applicable prospectus supplement, all securities of any one series need not be issued at the same time and may be issued from time to time without consent of any holder.

Senior Debt Securities

Payment of the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on Senior Debt Securities will rank on a parity with all of our other unsecured and unsubordinated debt.

Subordinated Debt Securities

Payment of the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on Subordinated Debt Securities will be subordinated and junior in right of payment to the prior payment in full of all of our senior debt. We will set forth in the applicable prospectus supplement relating to any Subordinated Debt Securities the subordination terms of such securities as well as the aggregate amount of outstanding indebtedness, as of the most recent practicable date, that by its terms would be senior to the Subordinated Debt Securities. We will also set forth in such prospectus supplement limitations, if any, on issuance of additional senior debt.

Conversion or Exchange Rights

Debt securities may be convertible into or exchangeable for shares of beneficial interest or property of the Company. The terms and conditions of conversion or exchange will be set forth in the applicable prospectus supplement. The terms will include, among others, the following:

 

   

the conversion or exchange price;

 

   

the conversion or exchange period;

 

22


Table of Contents
   

provisions regarding the ability of the Company or the holder to convert or exchange the debt securities;

 

   

events requiring adjustment to the conversion or exchange price; and

 

   

provisions affecting conversion or exchange in the event of our redemption of the debt securities.

Consolidation, Merger or Sale

We cannot consolidate or merge with or into, or transfer or lease all or substantially all of our assets to, any person unless (a) we will be the continuing corporation or (b) the successor corporation or person to which our assets are transferred or leased is a corporation organized under the laws of the United States, any state of the United States or the District of Columbia and it expressly assumes our obligations on the debt securities and under the indenture. In addition, we cannot effect such a transaction unless immediately after giving effect to such transaction, no default or event of default under the indenture shall have occurred and be continuing. Subject to certain exceptions, when the person to whom our assets are transferred or leased has assumed our obligations under the debt securities and the indenture, we shall be discharged from all our obligations under the debt securities and the indenture, except in limited circumstances.

This covenant would not apply to any recapitalization transaction, a change of control of the Company or a highly leveraged transaction, unless the transaction or change of control were structured to include a merger or consolidation or transfer or lease of all or substantially all of our assets.

Events of Default

Unless otherwise indicated, the term “Event of Default,” when used in the indenture, means any of the following:

 

   

failure to pay interest for 30 days after the date payment is due and payable;

 

   

failure to pay principal or premium, if any, on any debt security when due, either at maturity, upon any redemption, by declaration or otherwise;

 

   

failure to make sinking fund payments when due;

 

   

failure to perform any other covenant for 60 days after notice that performance was required;

 

   

events of bankruptcy, insolvency or reorganization of the Company; or

 

   

any other Event of Default provided in the applicable resolution of our board of trustees or the supplemental indenture under which we issue series of debt securities.

An Event of Default for a particular series of debt securities does not necessarily constitute an Event of Default for any other series of debt securities issued under the indenture. Unless otherwise indicated in the applicable prospectus supplement, an Event of Default relating to the payment of interest, principal or any sinking fund installment involving any series of debt securities has occurred and is continuing, the trustee or the holders of not less than 25% in aggregate principal amount of the debt securities of each affected series may declare the entire principal of all the debt securities of that series to be due and payable immediately.

Unless otherwise indicated in the applicable prospectus supplement, an Event of Default relating to the performance of other covenants occurs and is continuing for a period of 60 days after notice of such, or if any other Event of Default occurs and is continuing involving all of the series of Senior Debt Securities, then the trustee or the holders of not less than 25% in aggregate principal amount of all of the series of Senior Debt Securities may declare the entire principal amount of all of the series of Senior Debt Securities due and payable immediately.

Similarly, unless otherwise indicated in the applicable prospectus supplement, if an Event of Default relating to the performance of other covenants occurs and is continuing for a period of 60 days after notice of such, or if any other Event of Default occurs and is continuing involving all of the series of Subordinated Debt

 

23


Table of Contents

Securities, then the trustee or the holders of not less than 25% in aggregate principal amount of all of the series of Subordinated Debt Securities may declare the entire principal amount of all of the series of Subordinated Debt Securities due and payable immediately.

If, however, the Event of Default relating to the performance of other covenants or any other Event of Default that has occurred and is continuing is for less than all of the series of Senior Debt Securities or Subordinated Debt Securities, as the case may be, then, unless otherwise indicated in the applicable prospectus supplement, the trustee or the holders of not less than 25% in aggregate principal amount of each affected series of the Senior Debt Securities or the Subordinated Debt Securities, as the case may be, may declare the entire principal amount of all debt securities of such affected series due and payable immediately. The holders of not less than a majority in aggregate principal amount of the debt securities of a series may, after satisfying conditions, rescind and annul any of the above-described declarations and consequences involving the series.

If an Event of Default relating to events of bankruptcy, insolvency or reorganization of the Company occurs and is continuing, then the principal amount of all of the debt securities outstanding, and any accrued interest, will automatically become due and payable immediately, without any declaration or other act by the trustee or any holder.

The indenture imposes limitations on suits brought by holders of debt securities against us. Except as provided below, no holder of debt securities of any series may institute any action against us under the indenture unless:

 

   

the holder has previously given to the trustee written notice of default and continuance of that default;

 

   

the holders of at least 25% in principal amount of the outstanding debt securities of the affected series have requested that the trustee institute the action;

 

   

the requesting holders have offered the trustee reasonable indemnity for expenses and liabilities that may be incurred by bringing the action;

 

   

the trustee has not instituted the action within 60 days of the request; and

 

   

the trustee has not received inconsistent direction by the holders of a majority in principal amount of the outstanding debt securities of the series.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, each holder of debt securities of any series has the right, which is absolute and unconditional, to receive payment of the principal of and premium and interest, if any, on such debt securities when due and to institute suit for the enforcement of any such payment, and such rights may not be impaired without the consent of that holder of debt securities.

We will be required to file annually with the Trustee a certificate, signed by an officer of the Company, stating whether or not the officer knows of any default by us in the performance, observance or fulfillment of any condition or covenant of the indenture.

Registered Global Securities

We may issue the debt securities of a series in whole or in part in the form of one or more fully registered global securities that we will deposit with a depositary or with a nominee for a depositary identified in the applicable prospectus supplement and registered in the name of such depositary or nominee. In such case, we will issue one or more registered global securities denominated in an amount equal to the aggregate principal amount of all of the debt securities of the series to be issued and represented by such registered global security or securities.

Unless and until it is exchanged in whole or in part for debt securities in definitive registered form, a registered global security may not be transferred except as a whole:

 

   

by the depositary for such registered global security to its nominee;

 

24


Table of Contents
   

by a nominee of the depositary to the depositary or another nominee of the depositary; or

 

   

by the depositary or its nominee to a successor of the depositary or a nominee of the successor.

The prospectus supplement relating to a series of debt securities will describe the specific terms of the depositary arrangement with respect to any portion of such series represented by a registered global security. We anticipate that the following provisions will apply to all depositary arrangements for debt securities:

 

   

ownership of beneficial interests in a registered global security will be limited to persons that have accounts with the depositary for the registered global security, those persons being referred to as “participants,” or persons that may hold interests through participants;

 

   

upon the issuance of a registered global security, the depositary for the registered global security will credit, on its book-entry registration and transfer system, the participants’ accounts with the respective principal amounts of the debt securities represented by the registered global security beneficially owned by the participants;

 

   

any dealers, underwriters, or agents participating in the distribution of the debt securities will designate the accounts to be credited; and

 

   

ownership of any beneficial interest in the registered global security will be shown on, and the transfer of any ownership interest will be effected only through, records maintained by the depositary for the registered global security (with respect to interests of participants) and on the records of participants (with respect to interests of persons holding through participants).

The laws of some states may require that certain purchasers of securities take physical delivery of the securities in definitive form. These laws may limit the ability of those persons to own, transfer or pledge beneficial interests in registered global securities.

So long as the depositary for a registered global security, or its nominee, is the registered owner of the registered global security, the depositary or the nominee, as the case may be, will be considered the sole owner or holder of the debt securities represented by the registered global security for all purposes under the indenture. Except as set forth below, owners of beneficial interests in a registered global security:

 

   

will not be entitled to have the debt securities represented by a registered global security registered in their names;

 

   

will not receive or be entitled to receive physical delivery of the debt securities in the definitive form; and

 

   

will not be considered the owners or holders of the debt securities under the indenture.

Accordingly, each person owning a beneficial interest in a registered global security must rely on the procedures of the depositary for the registered global security and, if the person is not a participant, on the procedures of a participant through which the person owns its interest, to exercise any rights of a holder under the indenture.

We understand that under existing industry practices, if we request any action of holders or if an owner of a beneficial interest in a registered global security desires to give or take any action that a holder is entitled to give or take under the indenture, the depositary for the registered global security would authorize the participants holding the relevant beneficial interests to give or take the action, and those participants would authorize beneficial owners owning through those participants to give or take the action or would otherwise act upon the instructions of beneficial owners holding through them.

We will make payments of principal and premium, if any, and interest, if any, on debt securities represented by a registered global security registered in the name of a depositary or its nominee to the depositary or its nominee, as the case may be, as the registered owners of the registered global security. None of the Company, the

 

25


Table of Contents

trustee or any other agent of the Company or the trustee will be responsible or liable for any aspect of the records relating to, or payments made on account of, beneficial ownership interests in the registered global security or for maintaining, supervising or reviewing any records relating to the beneficial ownership interests.

We expect that the depositary for any debt securities represented by a registered global security, upon receipt of any payments of principal and premium, if any, and interest, if any, in respect of the registered global security, will immediately credit participants’ accounts with payments in amounts proportionate to their respective beneficial interests in the registered global security as shown on the records of the depositary. We also expect that standing customer instructions and customary practices will govern payments by participants to owners of beneficial interests in the registered global security held through the participants, as is now the case with the securities held for the accounts of customers in bearer form or registered in “street name.” We also expect that any of these payments will be the responsibility of the participants.

If the depositary for any debt securities represented by a registered global security is at any time unwilling or unable to continue as depositary or ceases to be a clearing agency registered under the Exchange Act, we will appoint an eligible successor depositary. If we fail to appoint an eligible successor depositary within 90 days, we will issue the debt securities in definitive form in exchange for the registered global security. In addition, we may at any time and in our sole discretion decide not to have any of the debt securities of a series represented by one or more registered global securities. In such event, we will issue debt securities of that series in a definitive form in exchange for all of the registered global securities representing the debt securities. The trustee will register any debt securities issued in definitive form in exchange for a registered global security in such name or names as the depositary, based upon instructions from its participants, shall instruct the trustee.

We may also issue bearer debt securities of a series in the form of one or more global securities, referred to as “bearer global securities.” We will deposit these bearer global securities with a common depositary for Euroclear System and Clearstream Bank Luxembourg, Societe Anonyme, or with a nominee for the depositary identified in the prospectus supplement relating to that series. The prospectus supplement relating to a series of debt securities represented by a bearer global security will describe the specific terms and procedures, including the specific terms of the depositary arrangement and any specific procedures for the issuance of debt securities in definitive form in exchange for a bearer global security, with respect to the position of the series represented by a bearer global security.

Discharge, Defeasance and Covenant Defeasance

We can discharge or defease our obligations under the indenture as set forth below. Unless otherwise set forth in the applicable prospectus supplement, the subordination provisions applicable to any Subordinated Debt Securities will be expressly subject to the discharge and defeasance provisions of the indenture.

We may discharge some of our obligations to holders of any series of debt securities that have not already been delivered to the trustee for cancellation and that have either become due and payable or are by their terms to become due and payable within one year (or are scheduled for redemption within one year). We may effect a discharge by irrevocably depositing with the trustee cash or U.S. government obligations, as trust funds, in an amount certified to be sufficient to pay when due, whether at maturity, upon redemption or otherwise, the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the debt securities and any mandatory sinking fund payments.

Unless otherwise provided in the applicable prospectus supplement, we may also discharge any and all of our obligations to holders of any series of debt securities at any time (“defeasance”). We also may be released from the obligations imposed by any covenants of any outstanding series of debt securities and provisions of the indenture, and we may omit to comply with those covenants without creating an Event of Default (“covenant defeasance”). We may effect defeasance and covenant defeasance only if, among other things:

 

   

we irrevocably deposit with the trustee cash or U.S. government obligations, as trust funds, in an amount certified to be sufficient to pay at maturity (or upon redemption) the principal, premium, if any, and interest on all outstanding debt securities of the series; and

 

26


Table of Contents
   

we deliver to the trustee an opinion of counsel from a nationally recognized law firm to the effect that the holders of the series of debt securities will not recognize income, gain or loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes as a result of the defeasance or covenant defeasance and that defeasance or covenant defeasance will not otherwise alter the holders’ U.S. federal income tax treatment of principal, premium, if any, and interest payments on the series of debt securities, which opinion, in the case of legal defeasance, must be based on a ruling of the Internal Revenue Service issued, or a change in U.S. federal income tax law.

Although we may discharge or defease our obligations under the indenture as described in the two preceding paragraphs, we may not avoid, among other things, our duty to register the transfer or exchange of any series of debt securities, to replace any temporary, mutilated, destroyed, lost or stolen series of debt securities or to maintain an office or agency in respect of any series of debt securities.

Modification of the Indenture

The indenture provides that we and the trustee may enter into supplemental indentures without the consent of the holders of debt securities to:

 

   

secure any debt securities;

 

   

evidence the assumption by a successor corporation of our obligations;

 

   

add covenants for the protection of the holders of debt securities;

 

   

cure any ambiguity or correct any inconsistency in the indenture;

 

   

establish the forms or terms of debt securities of any series; and

 

   

evidence and provide for the acceptance of appointment by a successor trustee.

The indenture also provides that we and the trustee may, with the consent of the holders of not less than a majority in aggregate principal amount of debt securities of all series of Senior Debt Securities or Subordinated Debt Securities, as the case may be, then outstanding and affected (voting as one class), add any provisions to, or change in any manner, eliminate or modify in any way the provisions of, the indenture or modify in any manner the rights of the holders of the debt securities. We and the trustee may not, however, without the consent of the holder of each outstanding debt security affected thereby:

 

   

extend the final maturity of any debt security;

 

   

reduce the principal amount or premium, if any;

 

   

reduce the rate or extend the time of payment of interest;

 

   

reduce any amount payable on redemption;

 

   

change the currency in which the principal (other than as may be provided otherwise with respect to a series), premium, if any, or interest is payable;

 

   

reduce the amount of the principal of any debt security issued with an original issue discount that is payable upon acceleration or provable in bankruptcy;

 

   

modify any of the subordination provisions or the definition of senior indebtedness applicable to any Subordinated Debt Securities in a manner adverse to the holders of those securities;

 

   

alter provisions of the indenture relating to the debt securities not denominated in U.S. dollars;

 

   

impair the right to institute suit for the enforcement of any payment on any debt security when due; or

 

   

reduce the percentage of holders of debt securities of any series whose consent is required for any modification of the indenture.

 

27


Table of Contents

A prospectus supplement may set forth modifications or additions to these provisions with respect to a particular series of Debt Securities.

Concerning the Trustee

The indenture provides that there may be more than one trustee under the indenture, each with respect to one or more series of debt securities. If there are different trustees for different series of debt securities, each trustee will be a trustee of a trust under the indenture separate and apart from the trust administered by any other trustee under the indenture. Except as otherwise indicated in this prospectus or any prospectus supplement, any action permitted to be taken by a trustee may be taken by such trustee only with respect to the one or more series of debt securities for which it is the trustee under the indenture. Any trustee under the indenture may resign or be removed with respect to one or more series of debt securities. All payments of principal of, premium, if any, and interest on, and all registration, transfer, exchange, authentication and delivery (including authentication and delivery on original issuance of the debt securities) of, the debt securities of a series will be effected by the trustee with respect to that series at an office designated by the trustee in New York, New York.

The indenture contains limitations on the right of the trustee, should it become a creditor of the Company, to obtain payment of claims in some cases or to realize on certain property received in respect of any such claim as security or otherwise. The trustee may engage in other transactions. If it acquires any conflicting interest relating to any duties with respect to the debt securities, however, it must eliminate the conflict or resign as trustee.

The holders of a majority in aggregate principal amount of any series of debt securities then outstanding will have the right to direct the time, method and place of conducting any proceeding for exercising any remedy available to the trustee with respect to such series of debt securities, provided that the direction would not conflict with any rule of law or with the indenture, would not be unduly prejudicial to the rights of another holder of the debt securities, and would not involve any trustee in personal liability. The indenture provides that in case an Event of Default shall occur and be known to any trustee and not be cured, the trustee must use the same degree of care as a prudent person would use in the conduct of his or her own affairs in the exercise of the trustee’s power. Subject to these provisions, the trustee will be under no obligation to exercise any of its rights or powers under the indenture at the request of any of the holders of the debt securities, unless they shall have offered to the trustee security and indemnity satisfactory to the trustee.

No Individual Liability of Incorporators, Shareholders, Officers or Trustees

The indenture provides that no incorporator and no past, present or future shareholder, officer or trustee, of the Company or any successor corporation in their capacity as such shall have any individual liability for any of our obligations, covenants or agreements under the debt securities or the indenture.

Governing Law

The indenture and the debt securities will be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of New York.

 

28


Table of Contents

MATERIAL U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES

For purposes of the following discussion, references to “our company,” “we” and “us” mean Public Storage and not its subsidiaries or affiliates. The following discussion describes the material U.S. federal income tax considerations relating to the taxation of Public Storage as a REIT and the acquisition, ownership and disposition of our common shares. If we offer debt securities or equity securities other than common shares, information about any additional income tax consequences to holders of those securities will be included in the documents pursuant to which those securities are offered.

Because this is a summary that is intended to address only the federal income tax considerations relating to the ownership and disposition of our common shares, it may not contain all the information that may be important in your specific circumstances. As you review this discussion, you should keep in mind that:

(1) The tax considerations to you may vary depending on your particular tax situation;

(2) Special rules that are not discussed below may apply to you if, for example, you are a tax-exempt organization, a broker-dealer, a non-U.S. person, a trust, an estate, a regulated investment company, a financial institution, an insurance company, or otherwise subject to special tax treatment under the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”);

(3) This summary does not address state, local or non-U.S. tax considerations;

(4) This summary deals only with Public Storage common shareholders that hold common shares as “capital assets,” within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Code; and

(5) This discussion is not intended to be, and should not be construed as, tax advice.

You are urged both to review the following discussion and to consult with your tax advisor to determine the effect of acquiring, owning and disposing of our common shares in your individual tax situation, including any state, local or non-U.S. tax consequences.

The information in this section is based on the Code, current, temporary and proposed regulations promulgated by the U.S. Treasury Department, the legislative history of the Code, current administrative interpretations and practices of the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”), and court decisions. The reference to IRS interpretations and practices includes IRS practices and policies as endorsed in private letter rulings, which are not binding on the IRS except with respect to the taxpayer that receives the ruling. In each case, these sources are relied upon as they exist on the date of this registration statement. Future legislation, regulations, administrative interpretations and court decisions could change current law or adversely affect existing interpretations of current law. Any change could apply retroactively. Except as described under “—Taxation of Public Storage as a REIT—Income Tests Applicable to REITs,” we have not obtained any rulings from the IRS concerning the tax treatment of the matters discussed below. Accordingly, even if there is no change in the applicable law, no assurance can be provided that the statements made in the following discussion, which do not bind the IRS or the courts, will not be challenged by the IRS or will be sustained by a court if so challenged.

Taxation of Public Storage as a REIT

General.    We elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Code beginning with our taxable year ended December 31, 1981. A REIT generally is not subject to federal income tax on the net income that it distributes to shareholders if it meets the applicable REIT distribution requirements and other requirements for REIT qualification under the Code.

We believe that we have been and that we are organized and have operated, and we intend to continue to operate, in a manner to qualify as a REIT, but there can be no assurance that we qualify or will remain qualified as a REIT. Qualification and taxation as a REIT depend upon our ability to meet, through actual annual (or in

 

29


Table of Contents

some cases quarterly) operating results, requirements relating to income, asset ownership, distribution levels and diversity of share ownership, and the various other REIT qualification requirements imposed under the Code. Given the complex nature of the REIT qualification requirements, the ongoing importance of factual determinations and the possibility of future changes in our circumstances, we cannot provide any assurance that our actual operating results will satisfy the requirements for taxation as a REIT under the Code for any particular taxable year.

The sections of the Code that relate to our qualification and operation as a REIT are highly technical and complex. This discussion sets forth the material aspects of the sections of the Code that govern the federal income tax treatment of a REIT and its shareholders. This summary is qualified in its entirety by the applicable Code provisions, relevant rules and Treasury regulations, and related administrative and judicial interpretations.

Taxation.    For each taxable year in which we qualify for taxation as a REIT, we generally will not be subject to federal corporate income tax on our net income that is distributed currently to our shareholders. U.S. Shareholders (as defined below) generally will be subject to taxation on dividends (other than designated capital gain dividends and “qualified dividend income”) at rates applicable to ordinary income, instead of at lower capital gain rates. Qualification for taxation as a REIT enables the REIT and its shareholders to substantially eliminate the “double taxation” (that is, taxation at both the corporate and shareholder levels) that generally results from an investment in a regular corporation. Regular corporations (non-REIT “C” corporations) generally are subject to federal corporate income taxation on their income and shareholders of regular corporations are subject to tax on any dividends that are received. Currently, however, shareholders of regular corporations who are taxed at individual rates generally are taxed on dividends they receive at capital gains rates, which are lower for individuals than ordinary income rates, and shareholders of regular corporations who are taxed at regular corporate rates will receive the benefit of a dividends received deduction that substantially reduces the effective rate that they pay on such dividends. Income earned by a REIT and distributed currently to its shareholders generally will be subject to lower aggregate rates of federal income taxation than if such income were earned by a non-REIT “C” corporation, subjected to corporate income tax, and then distributed to shareholders and subjected to tax either at capital gain rates or the effective rate paid by a corporate recipient entitled to the benefit of the dividends received deduction.

While we generally will not be subject to corporate income taxes on income that we distribute currently to shareholders, we will be subject to federal income tax as follows:

1. We will be taxed at regular corporate rates on any undistributed “REIT taxable income.” REIT taxable income is the taxable income of the REIT subject to specified adjustments, including a deduction for dividends paid.

2. We may be subject to the “alternative minimum tax” on our undistributed items of tax preference, if any.

3. If we have (1) net income from the sale or other disposition of “foreclosure property” that is held primarily for sale to tenants in the ordinary course of business, or (2) other non-qualifying income from foreclosure property, we will be subject to tax at the highest corporate rate on this income.

4. Our net income from “prohibited transactions” will be subject to a 100% tax. In general, prohibited transactions are sales or other dispositions of property held primarily for sale to tenants in the ordinary course of business other than foreclosure property.

5. If we fail to satisfy either the 75% gross income test or the 95% gross income test discussed below, but nonetheless maintain our qualification as a REIT because other requirements are met, we will be subject to a tax equal to the gross income attributable to the greater of either (1) the amount by which 75% of our gross income exceeds the amount of our income qualifying under the 75% test for the taxable year or (2) the amount by which 95% of our gross income exceeds the amount of our income qualifying for the 95% income test for the taxable year, multiplied in either case by a fraction intended to reflect our profitability.

 

30


Table of Contents

6. We will be subject to a 4% nondeductible excise tax on the excess of the required distribution over the sum of amounts actually distributed, excess distributions from the preceding tax year and amounts retained for which federal income tax was paid if we fail to make the required distributions by the end of a calendar year. The required distributions for each calendar year is equal to the sum of:

 

   

85% of our REIT ordinary income for the year;

 

   

95% of our REIT capital gain net income for the year; and

 

   

any undistributed taxable income from prior taxable years.

7. We will be subject to a 100% penalty tax on some payments we receive (or on certain expenses deducted by a taxable REIT subsidiary) if arrangements among us, our tenants, and our taxable REIT subsidiaries are not comparable to similar arrangements among unrelated parties.

8. If we acquire any assets from a non-REIT “C” corporation in a carry-over basis transaction (such as in the case of our 1995 merger with Public Storage Management), we would be liable for corporate income tax, at the highest applicable corporate rate for the “built-in gain” with respect to those assets if we disposed of those assets within 10 years after they were acquired. Built-in gain is the amount by which an asset’s fair market value exceeds its adjusted tax basis at the time we acquire the asset. To the extent that assets are transferred to us in a carry-over basis transaction by a partnership in which a corporation owns an interest, we will be subject to this tax in proportion to the non-REIT “C” corporation’s interest in the partnership. We also have acquired assets in carryover basis merger transactions with a number of REITs (including our 1999 merger with Storage Trust Realty). If any such acquired REIT failed to qualify as a REIT at the time of its merger into us, it would have been a non-REIT “C” corporation and we also would be liable for tax liabilities inherited from it.

9. With regard to our 2005 and subsequent taxable years, if we fail to satisfy one of the REIT asset tests (other than certain de minimis failures), but nonetheless maintain our qualification as a REIT because other requirements are met, we will be subject to a tax equal to the greater of $50,000 or the amount determined by multiplying the net income generated by the non-qualifying assets during the period of time that the assets were held as non-qualifying assets by the highest rate of tax applicable to corporations.

10. With regard to our 2005 and subsequent taxable years, if we fail to satisfy certain of the requirements under the Code the failure of which would result in the loss of our REIT status, and the failure is due to reasonable cause and not willful neglect, we may be required to pay a penalty of $50,000 for each such failure in order to maintain our qualification as a REIT.

11. If we fail to comply with the requirements to send annual letters to our shareholders requesting information regarding the actual ownership of our shares and the failure was not due to reasonable cause or was due to willful neglect, we will be subject to a $25,000 penalty or, if the failure is intentional, a $50,000 penalty.

Furthermore, notwithstanding our status as a REIT, we also may have to pay certain state and local income taxes, because not all states and localities treat REITs the same as they are treated for federal income tax purposes. Moreover, each of our taxable REIT subsidiaries (as further described below) is subject to federal, state and local corporate income taxes on its net income.

If we are subject to taxation on our REIT taxable income or subject to tax due to the sale of a built-in gain asset that was acquired in a carry-over basis from a non-REIT “C” Corporation, some of the dividends we pay to our shareholders during the following year may be subject to tax at the reduced capital gains rates, rather than taxed at ordinary income rates. See “—Taxation of U.S. Shareholders—Qualified Dividend Income.”

Requirements for Qualification as a REIT.    The Code defines a REIT as a corporation, trust or association:

(1) that is managed by one or more trustees or directors;

(2) that issues transferable shares or transferable certificates to evidence its beneficial ownership;

 

31


Table of Contents

(3) that would be taxable as a domestic corporation, but for Sections 856 through 860 of the Code;

(4) that is neither a financial institution nor an insurance company within the meaning of certain provisions of the Code;

(5) that is beneficially owned by 100 or more persons;

(6) not more than 50% in value of the outstanding shares or other beneficial interest of which is owned, actually or constructively, by five or fewer individuals (as defined in the Code to include certain entities and as determined by applying certain attribution rules) during the last half of each taxable year;

(7) that makes an election to be a REIT for the current taxable year, or has made such an election for a previous taxable year that has not been revoked or terminated, and satisfies all relevant filing and other administrative requirements established by the IRS that must be met to elect and maintain REIT status;

(8) that uses a calendar year for federal income tax purposes and complies with the recordkeeping requirements of the Code and the Treasury regulations promulgated thereunder; and

(9) that meets other applicable tests, described below, regarding the nature of its income and assets and the amount of its distributions.

The Code provides that conditions (1), (2), (3) and (4) above must be met during the entire taxable year and condition (5) above must be met during at least 335 days of a taxable year of 12 months, or during a proportionate part of a taxable year of less than 12 months. Conditions (5) and (6) do not apply until after the first taxable year for which an election is made to be taxed as a REIT. Condition (6) must be met during the last half of each taxable year. For purposes of determining share ownership under condition (6) above, a supplemental unemployment compensation benefits plan, a private foundation or a portion of a trust permanently set aside or used exclusively for charitable purposes generally is considered an individual. However, a trust that is a qualified trust under Code Section 401(a) generally is not considered an individual, and beneficiaries of a qualified trust are treated as holding shares of a REIT in proportion to their actuarial interests in the trust for purposes of condition (6) above.

We believe that we have been organized, have operated and have issued sufficient shares of beneficial ownership with sufficient diversity of ownership to allow us to satisfy the above conditions. In addition, our organizational documents contain restrictions regarding the transfer of our shares that are intended to assist us in continuing to satisfy the share ownership requirements described in conditions (5) and (6) above. The ownership restrictions in our declaration of trust generally prohibit the actual or constructive ownership of more than 3% of our outstanding common shares or more than 9.9% of the outstanding class or series of preferred or equity shares, in each case, other than certain “excepted holders” or “designated investment entities,” (each as defined in our declaration of trust), which are subject to separate limits set forth in our declaration of trust, unless an exemption is granted by the board of trustees. See “Ownership Limitations.” At the time of the merger with Public Storage Management, to further assist us in meeting the ownership restrictions, the Hughes family entered into an agreement with us for the benefit of Public Storage and certain designated charitable beneficiaries providing that if, at any time, for any reason, more than 50% in value of our outstanding shares otherwise would be considered owned by five or fewer individuals, then a number of common shares owned by Wayne Hughes necessary to cure such violation would automatically and irrevocably be transferred to a designated charitable beneficiary.

The REIT protective provisions of our organizational documents are modeled after certain arrangements that the IRS has ruled in private letter rulings will preclude a REIT from being considered to violate the ownership restrictions so long as the arrangements are enforceable as a matter of state law and the REIT seeks to enforce them as and when necessary. There can be no assurance, however, that the IRS might not seek to take a different position concerning Public Storage (a private letter ruling is legally binding only as to the taxpayer to whom it was issued and we will not seek a private ruling on this issue) or contend that we failed to enforce these various arrangements. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that these arrangements necessarily will preserve our REIT status. If we fail to satisfy these share ownership requirements, we will fail to qualify as a REIT.

 

32


Table of Contents

To monitor compliance with condition (6) above, a REIT is required to send annual letters to its shareholders requesting information regarding the actual ownership of its shares. If we comply with the annual letters requirement and do not know, or exercising reasonable diligence, would not have known, of a failure to meet condition (6) above, then we will be treated as having met condition (6) above.

To qualify as a REIT, we cannot have at the end of any taxable year any undistributed earnings and profits that are attributable to a non-REIT taxable year. As a result of the 1995 merger with Public Storage Management, the 1999 merger with Storage Trust Realty and mergers with other affiliated REITs, Public Storage has succeeded to various tax attributes of those entities and their predecessors, including any undistributed earnings and profits. We do not believe that we have acquired any undistributed non-REIT earnings and profits and we believe that the REITs with which we have merged qualified as REITs at the time of acquisition. However, neither these entities nor Public Storage has sought an opinion of counsel or outside accountants to the effect that we did not acquire any undistributed non-REIT earnings and profits. There can be no assurance that the IRS would not contend otherwise on a subsequent audit.

If the IRS determined that we inherited undistributed non-REIT earnings and profits and that we did not distribute the non-REIT earnings and profits by the end of that taxable year, it appears that we could avoid disqualification as a REIT by using “deficiency dividend” procedures to distribute the non-REIT earnings and profits. The deficiency dividend procedures would require us to make a distribution to shareholders, in addition to the regularly required REIT distributions, within 90 days of the IRS determination. In addition, we would have to pay to the IRS interest on 50% of the non-REIT earnings and profits that were not distributed prior to the end of the taxable year in which we inherited the undistributed non-REIT earnings and profits. If, however, we were considered to be a “successor” under the applicable Treasury regulations to a corporation that had failed to qualify as a REIT at the time of its merger with Public Storage, we could fail to qualify as a REIT and could be prevented from reelecting REIT status for up to four years after such failure to qualify.

Qualified REIT Subsidiaries.    We may acquire 100% of the stock of one or more corporations that are qualified REIT subsidiaries. A corporation will qualify as a qualified REIT subsidiary if we own 100% of its stock and it is not a taxable REIT subsidiary. A qualified REIT subsidiary will not be treated as a separate corporation, and all assets, liabilities and items of income, deduction and credit of a qualified REIT subsidiary will be treated as our assets, liabilities and such items (as the case may be) for all purposes of the Code, including the REIT qualification tests. For this reason, references in this discussion to our income and assets should be understood to include the income and assets of any qualified REIT subsidiary we own. A qualified REIT subsidiary will not be subject to federal income tax, although it may be subject to state and local taxation in some states. Our ownership of the voting stock of a qualified REIT subsidiary will not violate the asset test restrictions against ownership of securities of any one issuer which constitute more than 10% of the voting power or value of such issuer’s securities or more than five percent of the value of our total assets, as described below in “—Asset Tests Applicable to REITs”.

Taxable REIT Subsidiaries.    A taxable REIT subsidiary is a corporation other than a REIT in which we directly or indirectly hold stock, which has made a joint election with us to be treated as a taxable REIT subsidiary under Section 856(l) of the Code. A taxable REIT subsidiary also includes any corporation other than a REIT in which a taxable REIT subsidiary of ours owns, directly or indirectly, securities, (other than certain “straight debt” securities), which represent more than 35% of the total voting power or value of the outstanding securities of such corporation. Other than some activities relating to lodging and health care facilities, a taxable REIT subsidiary may generally engage in any business, including the provision of customary or non-customary services to our tenants without causing us to receive impermissible tenant service income under the REIT gross income tests. A taxable REIT subsidiary is required to pay regular federal income tax, and state and local income tax where applicable, as a non-REIT “C” corporation. In addition, a taxable REIT subsidiary may be prevented from deducting interest on debt funded directly or indirectly by us if certain tests regarding the taxable REIT subsidiary’s debt to equity ratio and interest expense are not satisfied. If dividends are paid to us by our taxable REIT subsidiary, then a portion of the dividends we distribute to shareholders who are taxed at individual rates

 

33


Table of Contents

will generally be eligible for taxation at lower capital gains rates, rather than at ordinary income rates. See “Taxation of U.S. Shareholders—Qualified Dividend Income.”

Generally, a taxable REIT subsidiary can perform impermissible tenant services without causing us to receive impermissible tenant services income under the REIT income tests. However, several provisions applicable to the arrangements between a REIT and its taxable REIT subsidiaries are intended to ensure that a taxable REIT subsidiary will be subject to an appropriate level of federal income taxation. For example, a taxable REIT subsidiary is limited in its ability to deduct interest payments made directly or indirectly to us in excess of a certain amount. In addition, a REIT will be obligated to pay a 100% penalty tax on some payments that it receives or on certain expenses deducted by the taxable REIT subsidiary if the economic arrangements between the REIT, the REIT’s tenants and the taxable REIT subsidiary are not comparable to similar arrangements among unrelated parties. Our taxable REIT subsidiaries may make interest and other payments to us and to third parties in connection with activities related to our properties. There can be no assurance that our taxable REIT subsidiaries will not be limited in their ability to deduct certain interest payments made to us. In addition, there can be no assurance that the IRS might not seek to impose the 100% excise tax on a portion of payments received by us from, or expenses deducted by, our taxable REIT subsidiaries.

PS Orangeco, Inc. (and its subsidiaries, including PS Pickup & Delivery, Inc.), PSCC, Inc., PS Insurance Company—Hawaii, Ltd. and certain other corporations (including corporations the interests in which were directly or indirectly acquired in connection with the Shurgard merger) have elected, together with us, to be treated as taxable REIT subsidiaries of Public Storage. These entities engage in businesses such as the portable self-storage business, providing moving services and tenant reinsurance, selling locks, boxes and packing materials, and renting trucks, among other activities.

Ownership of Partnership Interests by a REIT.    A REIT that owns an equity interest in an entity treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes is deemed to own its share (based upon its proportionate share of the capital of the partnership) of the assets of the partnership and is deemed to earn its proportionate share of the partnership’s income. The assets and gross income of the partnership retain the same character in the hands of the REIT for purposes of the gross income and asset tests applicable to REITs as described below. In the mergers with Public Storage Management and Storage Trust Realty, the formation of PS Business Parks, L.P., and in other transactions, we have acquired interests in various partnerships that own and operate properties. Thus, our proportionate share of the assets and items of income of Storage Trust Properties, L.P., PS Business Parks, L.P. or other partnerships, including any such partnerships’ shares of assets and items of income of any subsidiaries that are partnerships or limited liability companies treated as partnerships for federal income tax purposes, are treated as assets and items of income of Public Storage for purposes of applying the REIT asset and income tests. For these purposes, under current Treasury regulations our interest in each of the partnerships must be determined in accordance with our “capital interest” in each entity, as applicable.

We believe that Storage Trust Properties, L.P., PS Business Parks, L.P. and each of the partnerships and limited liability companies in which we own an interest, directly or through another partnership or limited liability company, will be treated as partnerships or disregarded for federal income tax purposes and will not be taxable as corporations. If any of these entities were treated as a corporation, it would be subject to an entity level tax on its income and we could fail to meet the REIT income and asset tests. See “—Income Tests Applicable to REITs” and “—Asset Tests Applicable to REITs” below.

Income Tests Applicable to REITs.    To qualify as a REIT, we must satisfy two gross income tests which are applied on an annual basis. First, in each taxable year we must derive directly or indirectly at least 75% of our gross income, excluding gross income from prohibited transactions, from investments relating to real property or mortgages on real property or from some types of temporary investments. Income from investments relating to real property or mortgages on related property includes “rents from real property,” gains on the disposition of real estate, dividends paid by another REIT and interest on obligations secured by mortgages on real property or on interests in real property. Second, in each taxable year we must derive at least 95% of our gross income,

 

34


Table of Contents

excluding gross income from prohibited transactions, from any combination of income qualifying under the 75% test and dividends, interest, and gain from the sale or disposition of stock or securities.

Rents we receive will qualify as “rents from real property” for the purpose of satisfying the gross income requirements for a REIT described above only if several conditions are met:

 

   

The amount of rent must not be based in whole or in part on the income or profits of any person. However, an amount we receive or accrue generally will not be excluded from the term “rents from real property” solely by reason of being based on a fixed percentage or percentages of gross receipts or sales;

 

   

We, or an actual or constructive owner of 10% or more of our shares, must not actually or constructively own 10% or more of the interests in the tenant, or, if the tenant is a corporation, 10% or more of the voting power or value of all classes of stock of the tenant. Rents received from such a tenant that is a taxable REIT subsidiary, however, will not be excluded from the definition of “rents from real property” as a result of this condition if either (i) at least 90% of the space at the property to which the rents relate is leased to third parties, and the rents paid by the taxable REIT subsidiary are comparable to rents paid by our other tenants for comparable space or (ii) the property is a qualified lodging property and such property is operated on behalf of the taxable REIT subsidiary by a person who is an independent contractor and certain other requirements are met;

 

   

Rent attributable to personal property, leased in connection with a lease of real property, is not greater than 15% of the total rent received under the lease. If this requirement is not met, then the portion of rent attributable to personal property will not qualify as “rents from real property;” and

 

   

We generally must not provide directly impermissible tenant services to the tenants of a property, subject to a 1% de minimis exception, other than through an independent contractor from whom we derive no income or a taxable REIT subsidiary. We may, however, directly perform certain services that are “usually or customarily rendered” in connection with the rental of space for occupancy only and are not otherwise considered “rendered primarily for the convenience of the tenant” of the property. Examples of such services include the provision of light, heat, or other utilities, trash removal and general maintenance of common areas. In addition, we may provide through an independent contractor or a taxable REIT subsidiary, which may be wholly or partially owned by us, both customary and non-customary services to our tenants without causing the rent we receive from those tenants to fail to qualify as “rents from real property.” If the total amount of income we receive from providing impermissible tenant services at a property exceeds 1% of our total income from that property, then all of the income from that property will fail to qualify as “rents from real property.” Impermissible tenant service income is deemed to be at least 150% of our direct cost in providing the service.

In light of these requirements, we do not intend to take any of the actions listed below, unless we determine that the resulting nonqualifying income, taken together with all other nonqualifying income that we earn in the taxable year, will not jeopardize our status as a REIT:

(1) charge rent for any property that is based in whole or in part on the income or profits of any person (unless based on a fixed percentage or percentages of gross receipts or sales, as permitted and described above);

(2) rent any property to a related party tenant, including a taxable REIT subsidiary, unless the rent from the lease to the taxable REIT subsidiary would qualify for the special exception from the related party tenant rule applicable to certain leases with a taxable REIT subsidiary;

(3) derive rental income attributable to personal property other than personal property leased in connection with the lease of real property, the amount of which is less than 15% of the total rent received under the lease; or

(4) directly perform services considered to be noncustomary or “rendered to the occupant” of the property.

 

35


Table of Contents

In connection with our merger with Public Storage Management, Public Storage and the various other owners of self-storage facilities and business parks for which we performed management activities entered into an agreement with PSCC, Inc. under which PSCC provides the owners and Public Storage certain administrative and cost-sharing services in connection with the operation of the properties and the performance of certain administrative functions. The services include the provision of corporate office space and certain equipment, personnel required for the operation and maintenance of the properties, and corporate or partnership administration. Each of the owners and Public Storage pay PSCC directly for services rendered by PSCC in connection with the administrative and cost sharing agreement. That payment is separate from and in addition to the compensation paid to Public Storage under the management agreements for the management of the properties owned by the owners. At the time of the merger with Public Storage Management, we received a private letter ruling from the IRS to the effect that the reimbursements and other payments made to PSCC by the owners would not be treated as our revenues for purposes of the 95% gross income test, and to the effect that our income from self-storage facility rentals generally would qualify as rent from real property for purposes of the REIT gross income tests. We subsequently received a private letter ruling indicating that the truck rental activities of an affiliated corporation (PS Orangeco, Inc., now a taxable REIT subsidiary of Public Storage) would not adversely affect the treatment of our income from self-storage facility rentals as rent from real property for purposes of the REIT gross income tests.

We now own directly and indirectly all of Pickup & Delivery (the portable self-storage business). The income from that business would be nonqualifying income to us and the business is conducted by a limited partnership between Public Storage and a subsidiary of PS Orangeco, Inc. The share of gross income of that business attributable to our direct partnership interest, when combined with our other nonqualifying income, must be less than 5% of our total gross income. While we have earned and will continue to earn some nonqualifying income from this and other sources, we anticipate that we will be able to continue to satisfy both the 75% and 95% gross income tests.

The ownership of certain partnership interests creates several issues regarding our satisfaction of the 95% gross income test. First, we earn property management fees from these partnerships. Existing Treasury regulations do not address the treatment of management fees derived by a REIT from a partnership in which the REIT holds a partnership interest, but the IRS has issued a number of private letter rulings holding that the portion of the management fee that corresponds to the REIT’s interest in the partnership in effect is disregarded in applying the 95% gross income test when the REIT holds a “substantial” interest in the partnership. We disregard the portion of management fees derived from partnerships in which we are a partner that corresponds to our interest in these partnerships in determining the amount of our nonqualifying income. There can be no assurance, however, that the IRS would not take a contrary position with respect to Public Storage, either rejecting the approach set forth in the private letter rulings mentioned above or contending that our situation is distinguishable from those addressed in the private letter rulings (for example, arguing that we do not have a “substantial” interest in the partnerships).

In addition, we acquired interests in certain of these partnerships that entitle us to a percentage of profits (either from operations, or upon a sale, or both) in excess of the percentage of total capital originally contributed to the partnership with respect to such interest. Existing Treasury regulations do not specifically address how our “capital interest” in partnerships of this type should be determined. This determination is relevant because it affects both the percentage of the gross rental income of the partnership that is considered gross rental income (or qualifying income) to us and the percentage of the management fees paid to us that is disregarded in determining our nonqualifying income. For example, if we take the position that we have a 25% “capital interest” in a partnership (because we would receive 25% of the partnership’s assets upon a sale and liquidation) but the IRS determines we only have a 1% “capital interest” (because the original holder of our interest only contributed 1% of the total capital contributed to the partnership), our share of the qualifying income from the partnership would be reduced and the portion of the management fee from the partnership that would be treated as nonqualifying income would be increased, both of which would adversely affect our ability to satisfy the 75% and 95% gross income tests. In determining our “capital interest” in the various partnerships, we estimate the percentage of the

 

36


Table of Contents

partnership’s assets that would be distributed to us if those assets were sold and distributed among the partners in accordance with the applicable provisions of the partnership agreements. There can be no assurance, however, that the IRS will agree with this methodology and not contend that another, perhaps less favorable, method must be used for purposes of determining our “capital interests,” which could adversely affect our ability to satisfy the 75% and 95% gross income tests.

Moreover, in connection with the Shurgard merger, we have acquired indirect equity interests in real estate located outside of the United States, and Public Storage may acquire additional interests in non-U.S. properties both directly and through equity interests in partnerships, joint ventures, or other legal entities that have invested in real estate. These investments carry risks and uncertainties with respect to our status as a REIT that are not present when we invest directly in real estate in the U.S. and against which we may not be able to protect.

“Interest” income that depends in whole or in part on the income or profits of any person generally will be non-qualifying income for purposes of the 75% or 95% gross income tests. However, interest based on a fixed percentage or percentages of gross receipts or sales may still qualify under the gross income tests. We do not expect to derive significant amounts of interest that would fail to qualify under the 75% and 95% gross income tests.

Our share of any dividends received from our corporate subsidiaries that are not “qualified REIT subsidiaries” (and from other corporations in which we own an interest) will qualify for purposes of the 95% gross income test but not for purposes of the 75% gross income test. We do not anticipate that we will receive sufficient dividends to cause us to exceed the limit on nonqualifying income under the 75% gross income test. Dividends that we receive from other qualifying REITs will qualify for purposes of both REIT income tests.

If we fail to satisfy one or both of the 75% or 95% gross income tests for any taxable year, we may nevertheless qualify as a REIT for that year if we are entitled to relief under the Code. These relief provisions generally will be available if our failure to meet the tests is due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect, and we disclose to the IRS the sources of our income as required by the Code and applicable regulations. It is not possible, however, to state whether in all circumstances we would be entitled to the benefit of these relief provisions. For example, if we fail to satisfy the gross income tests because nonqualifying income that we intentionally incur exceeds the limits on nonqualifying income, the IRS could conclude that the failure to satisfy the tests was not due to reasonable cause. If these relief provisions are inapplicable to a particular set of circumstances, we will fail to qualify as a REIT. As discussed under “—Taxation of Public Storage as a REIT—General” even if these relief provisions apply, a tax would be imposed based on the amount of nonqualifying income.

Prohibited Transaction Income.    Any gain that we realize on the sale of any property held as inventory or otherwise held primarily for sale to tenants in the ordinary course of business, including our share of any such gain realized through our subsidiary partnerships and disregarded entities for federal income tax purposes, will be treated as income from a prohibited transaction that is subject to a 100% penalty tax. Under existing law, whether property is held as inventory or primarily for sale to tenants in the ordinary course of a trade or business is a question of fact that depends on all the facts and circumstances surrounding the particular transaction. However, we will not be treated as a dealer in real property with respect to a property we sell for the purposes of the 100% tax if (i) we have held the property for at least four years for the production of rental income prior to the sale, (ii) capitalized expenditures on the property in the four years preceding the sale are less than 30% of the net selling price of the property, and (iii) we either (a) have seven or fewer sales of property (excluding certain property obtained through foreclosure) for the year of sale or (b) the aggregate tax basis of property sold during the year of sale is 10% or less of the aggregate tax basis of all of our assets as of the beginning of the taxable year

 

37


Table of Contents

and substantially all of the marketing and development expenditures with respect to the property sold are made through an independent contractor from whom we derive no income. The sale of more than one property to one buyer as part of one transaction constitutes one sale for purposes of this “safe harbor.” We intend to hold our facilities for investment with a view to long-term appreciation, to engage in the business of acquiring, developing and owning our facilities and to make occasional sales of facilities as are consistent with our investment objectives. However, the IRS may successfully contend that some or all of the sales made by us are prohibited transactions. In that case, we would be required to pay the 100% penalty tax on our allocable share of the gains resulting from any such sales.

Penalty Tax.    Any redetermined rents, redetermined deductions or excess interest we generate will be subject to a 100% penalty tax. In general, redetermined rents are rents from real property that are overstated as a result of services furnished by one of our taxable REIT subsidiaries to any of our tenants, and redetermined deductions and excess interest represent amounts that are deducted by a taxable REIT subsidiary for payments to us that are in excess of the amounts that would have been deducted based on arm’s-length negotiations. Rents we receive will not constitute redetermined rents if they qualify for the safe harbor provisions contained in the Code. Safe harbor provisions are provided where:

 

   

amounts are excluded from the definition of impermissible tenant service income as a result of satisfying the 1% de minimis exception;

 

   

a taxable REIT subsidiary renders a significant amount of similar services to unrelated parties and the charges for such services are substantially comparable;

 

   

rents paid to us by tenants who are not receiving services from the taxable REIT subsidiary are substantially comparable to the rents paid by our tenants leasing comparable space who are receiving services from the taxable REIT subsidiary and the charge for the services is separately stated; or

 

   

the taxable REIT subsidiary’s gross income from the service is not less than 150% of the taxable REIT subsidiary’s direct cost of furnishing the service.

While we anticipate that any fees paid to a taxable REIT subsidiary for tenant services will reflect arm’s-length rates, a taxable REIT subsidiary may under certain circumstances provide tenant services which do not satisfy any of the safe-harbor provisions described above. Nevertheless, these determinations are inherently factual, and the IRS has broad discretion to assert that amounts paid between related parties should be reallocated to clearly reflect their respective incomes. If the IRS successfully made such an assertion, we would be required to pay a 100% penalty tax on the redetermined rent, redetermined deductions or excess interest, as applicable.

Asset Tests Applicable to REITs.    At the close of each quarter of our taxable year, we must satisfy four tests relating to the nature and diversification of our assets:

(1) At least 75% of the value of our total assets must be represented by real estate assets, cash, cash items and government securities. For purposes of this test, real estate assets include our allocable share of real estate assets held by entities that are treated as partnerships or that are disregarded for federal income tax purposes, as well as stock or debt instruments that are purchased with the proceeds of an offering of shares or a public offering of debt with a term of at least five years, but only for the one-year period beginning on the date we receive such proceeds.

(2) Not more than 25% of our total assets may be represented by securities, other than those securities includable in the 75% asset class (e.g., securities that qualify as real estate assets and government securities);

(3) Except for equity investments in REITs, debt or equity investments in qualified REIT subsidiaries and taxable REIT subsidiaries, and other securities that qualify as “real estate assets” for purpose of the 75% test described in clause (1):

 

   

the value of any one issuer’s securities owned by us may not exceed 5% of the value of our total assets;

 

38


Table of Contents
   

we may not own more than 10% of any one issuer’s outstanding voting securities; and

 

   

we may not own more than 10% of the total value of the outstanding securities of any one issuer, other than securities that qualify for the “straight debt” exception discussed below; and

(4) Not more than 20% of the value of our total assets may be represented by the securities of one or more taxable REIT subsidiaries.

Securities for purposes of the asset tests may include debt securities. However, the Code specifically provides that the following types of debt will not be taken into account for purposes of the 10% value test: (1) securities that meet the “straight debt” safe-harbor, as discussed in the next paragraph; (2) loans to individuals or estates; (3) obligations to pay rent from real property; (4) rental agreements described in Section 467 of the Code; (5) any security issued by other REITs; (6) certain securities issued by a state, the District of Columbia, a foreign government, or a political subdivision of any of the foregoing, or the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico; and (7) any other arrangement as determined by the IRS. In addition, for purposes of the 10% value test only, to the extent we hold debt securities that are not described in the preceding sentence, (a) debt issued by partnerships that derive at least 75% of their gross income from sources that constitute qualifying income for purposes of the 75% gross income test, and (b) debt that is issued by any partnership, to the extent of our interest as a partner in the partnership, are not considered securities.

Debt will meet the “straight debt” safe harbor if (1) neither we, nor any of our controlled taxable REIT subsidiaries (i.e., taxable REIT subsidiaries more than 50% of the vote or value of the outstanding stock of which is directly or indirectly owned by us), own any securities not described in the preceding paragraph that have an aggregate value greater than one percent of the issuer’s outstanding securities, as calculated under the Code, (2) the debt is a written unconditional promise to pay on demand or on a specified date a sum certain in money, (3) the debt is not convertible, directly or indirectly, into stock, and (4) the interest rate and the interest payment dates of the debt are not contingent on the profits, the borrower’s discretion or similar factors. However, contingencies regarding time of payment and interest are permissible for purposes of qualifying as a straight debt security if either (1) such contingency does not have the effect of changing the effective yield of maturity, as determined under the Code, other than a change in the annual yield to maturity that does not exceed the greater of (i) 5% of the annual yield to maturity or (ii) 0.25%, or (2) neither the aggregate issue price nor the aggregate face amount of the issuer’s debt instruments held by the REIT exceeds $1,000,000 and not more than 12 months of unaccrued interest can be required to be prepaid thereunder. In addition, debt will not be disqualified from being treated as “straight debt” solely because the time or amount of payment is subject to a contingency upon a default or the exercise of a prepayment right by the issuer of the debt, provided that such contingency is consistent with customary commercial practice.

We currently own approximately 25% of the outstanding common stock of PS Business Parks, Inc., which has elected to be taxed as a REIT for federal income tax purposes (as well as a substantial portion of the outstanding common units of limited partnership interest of PS Business Parks, L.P., which may be exchangeable for shares of PS Business Parks, Inc.’s common stock). As a REIT, PS Business Parks, Inc. is subject to the various REIT qualification requirements. We believe that PS Business Parks, Inc. has been organized and has operated in a manner to qualify for taxation as a REIT for federal income tax purposes and will continue to be organized and operated in this manner. If PS Business Parks, Inc. were to fail to qualify as a REIT, our stock investment in PS Business Parks, Inc. would cease to be a qualifying real estate asset for purposes of the 75% gross asset test and would become subject to the 5% asset test, the 10% voting stock limitation, and the 10% value limitation generally applicable to our ownership in corporations (other than REITs, qualified REIT subsidiaries and taxable REIT subsidiaries). If PS Business Parks, Inc. failed to qualify as a REIT, we would not meet the 10% voting securities limitation and the 10% value limitation with respect to our interest in PS Business Parks, Inc., and accordingly, we also would fail to qualify as a REIT.

We believe that the aggregate value of our interests in our taxable REIT subsidiaries does not exceed, and in the future will not exceed, 20% of the aggregate value of our gross assets. As of each relevant testing date prior to the election to treat each corporate subsidiary of Public Storage or any other corporation in which we own an

 

39


Table of Contents

interest as a taxable REIT subsidiary, we believe we did not own more than 10% of the voting securities of any such entity. In addition, we believe that as of each relevant testing date prior to the election to treat each corporate subsidiary of Public Storage or any other corporation in which we own an interest as a taxable REIT subsidiary of Public Storage, our pro rata share of the value of the securities, including debt, of any such corporation or other issuer did not exceed 5% of the total value of our assets.

With respect to each issuer in which we currently own an interest that does not qualify as a REIT, a qualified REIT subsidiary or a taxable REIT subsidiary, we believe that our pro rata share of the value of the securities, including debt, of any such issuer does not exceed 5% of the total value of our assets and that it complies with the 10% voting securities limitation and 10% value limitation with respect to each such issuer. However, no independent appraisals have been obtained to support these conclusions. In this regard, however, we cannot provide any assurance that the IRS might not disagree with our determinations.

The asset tests must be satisfied not only on the last day of the calendar quarter in which we, directly or through pass-through subsidiaries, acquire securities in the applicable issuer, but also on the last day of the calendar quarter in which we increase our ownership of securities of such issuer, including as a result of increasing our interest in pass-through subsidiaries. After initially meeting the asset tests at the close of any quarter, we will not lose our status as a REIT for failure to satisfy the 25%, 20% or 5% asset tests solely by reason of changes in the relative values of our assets. If failure to satisfy the 25%, 20% or 5% asset tests results from an acquisition of securities or other property during a quarter, we can cure this failure by disposing of sufficient non-qualifying assets within 30 days after the close of that quarter. We intend to maintain adequate records of the value of our assets to ensure compliance with the asset tests and to take any available action within 30 days after the close of any quarter as may be required to cure any noncompliance with the 25%, 20% or 5% asset tests. Although we plan to take steps to ensure that we satisfy such tests for any quarter with respect to which testing is to occur, there can be no assurance that such steps will always be successful. If we fail to timely cure any noncompliance with the asset tests, we would cease to qualify as a REIT, unless we satisfy certain relief provisions described in the next paragraph.

Furthermore, for our 2005 and subsequent taxable years, the failure to satisfy the asset tests can be remedied even after the 30-day cure period under certain circumstances. If the total value of the assets that caused a failure of the 5% asset test, the 10% voting securities test or the 10% value test does not exceed either 1% of our assets at the end of the relevant quarter or $10,000,000, we can cure such a failure by disposing of sufficient assets to cure such a violation within six months following the last day of the quarter in which we first identify the failure of the asset test. For a violation of any of the asset tests not described in the prior sentence (including the 75%, 25% and the 20% asset tests), we can avoid disqualification as a REIT if the violation is due to reasonable cause and we dispose of an amount of assets sufficient to cure such violation within the six-month period described in the preceding sentence, pay a tax equal to the greater of $50,000 or the highest corporate tax rate multiplied by the net income generated by the nonqualifying assets during the period of time that the assets were held as nonqualifying assets, and file in accordance with applicable Treasury regulations a schedule with the IRS that describes the assets. The applicable Treasury regulations are yet to be issued. Thus, it is not possible to state with precision under what circumstances we would be entitled to the benefit of these provisions.

Annual Distribution Requirements Applicable to REITs.    To qualify as a REIT, we are required to distribute dividends, other than capital gain dividends, to our shareholders each year in an amount at least equal to the sum of:

 

   

90% of our “REIT taxable income”, computed without regard to the dividends paid deduction and our net capital gain; and

 

   

90% of our after tax net income, if any, from foreclosure property; minus

 

   

the excess of the sum of certain items of non-cash income over 5% of our “REIT taxable income.”

 

40


Table of Contents

In addition, for purposes of this test, non-cash income means income attributable to leveled stepped rents, original issue discount included in our taxable income without the receipt of a corresponding payment, cancellation of indebtedness or a like-kind exchange that is later determined to be taxable. We must pay these distributions in the taxable year to which they relate, or in the following taxable year if they are declared during the last three months of the taxable year, payable to shareholders of record on a specified date during such period and paid during January of the following year. Such distributions are treated as paid by us and received by our shareholders on December 31 of the year in which they are declared. In addition, at our election, a distribution for a taxable year may be declared before we timely file our tax return for such year and paid on or before the first regular dividend payment date after such declaration, provided such payment is made during the twelve-month period following the close of such year. These distributions are taxable to our shareholders, other than tax-exempt entities, in the year in which paid. This is so even though these distributions relate to the prior year for purposes of our 90% distribution requirement. The amount distributed must not be preferential—i.e., every shareholder of the class of shares with respect to which a distribution is made must be treated the same as every other shareholder of that class, and no class of shares may be treated otherwise than in accordance with its dividend rights as a class. To the extent that we do not distribute all of our net capital gain or distribute at least 90%, but less than 100%, of our “REIT taxable income,” as adjusted, we will be required to pay tax on that amount at regular corporate tax rates. We intend to make timely distributions sufficient to satisfy these annual distribution requirements.

In years prior to 1990, we made distributions in excess of our REIT taxable income. During 1990, we reduced the level of distributions to our shareholders. As a result, distributions paid by us in 1990 were less than 95% of our REIT taxable income for 1990. The same circumstance has existed with respect to each year through 2003. We have satisfied the REIT distribution requirements for 1990 through 2003 by attributing distributions in 1991 through 2004 to the prior year’s taxable income. We may be required to continue this pattern of making distributions after the close of a taxable year that are attributed to the prior year for this purpose, but shareholders will be treated for federal income tax purposes as having received such distributions in the taxable years in which they actually are made. The extent to which we will be required to attribute distributions to the prior year will depend on our operating results and the level of distributions as determined by the board of directors. As noted below, reliance on subsequent year distributions could cause us to be subject to an excise tax, although we intend to comply with the 85% current distribution requirement under the excise tax in an effort to avoid or minimize any effect of that tax.

We intend to make timely distributions sufficient to satisfy our annual distribution requirements. Although we anticipate that our cash flow will permit us to make those distributions, it is possible that, from time to time, we may not have sufficient cash or other liquid assets to meet these distribution requirements. In this event, we may find it necessary to arrange for short-term, or possibly long-term, borrowings to fund required distributions or to pay dividends in the form of taxable dividends of our shares.

Under some circumstances, we may be able to rectify an inadvertent failure to meet the distribution requirement for a year by paying “deficiency dividends” to our shareholders in a later year, which may be included in our deduction for dividends paid for the earlier year. Thus, we may be able to avoid being taxed on amounts distributed as deficiency dividends. However, we will be required to pay interest to the IRS based upon the amount of any deduction claimed for deficiency dividends.

Furthermore, we will be required to pay a 4% nondeductible excise tax to the extent we fail to distribute during each calendar year, or in the case of distributions with declaration and record dates falling in the last three months of the calendar year, by the end of January following such calendar year, at least the sum of:

 

   

85% of our REIT ordinary income for such year;

 

   

95% of our REIT capital gain net income for the year; and

 

   

any undistributed taxable income from prior taxable years.

 

41


Table of Contents

Any REIT taxable income and net capital gain on which this excise tax is imposed for any year is treated as an amount distributed during that year for purposes of calculating such tax and excess distributions from the immediately preceding year may be carried over.

A REIT may elect to retain rather than distribute all or a portion of its net capital gains and pay the tax on the gains. In that case, a REIT may elect to have its shareholders include their proportionate share of the undistributed net capital gains in income as long-term capital gains and receive a credit for their share of the tax paid by the REIT. For purposes of the 4% excise tax described above, any retained amounts would be treated as having been distributed.

Record-Keeping Requirements.    We are required to comply with applicable record-keeping requirements. Failure to comply could result in monetary fines.

Failure of Public Storage to Qualify as a REIT.    If we fail to comply with one or more of the conditions required for qualification as a REIT (other than asset tests and the income tests that have the specific savings clauses discussed above in “—Asset Tests Applicable to REITs,” and “—Income Tests Applicable to REITs”), we can avoid termination of our REIT status by paying a penalty of $50,000 for each such failure, provided that our noncompliance was due to reasonable cause and not willful neglect. If we fail to qualify for taxation as a REIT in any taxable year and the statutory relief provisions do not apply, we will be subject to tax, including any applicable alternative minimum tax, on our taxable income at regular corporate rates. Distributions to shareholders in any year in which we fail to qualify will not be deductible by us, and we will not be required to distribute any amounts to our shareholders. As a result, our failure to qualify as a REIT would significantly reduce the cash available for distribution by us to our shareholders. In addition, if we fail to qualify as a REIT, all distributions to shareholders will be taxable as dividends to the extent of our current and accumulated earnings and profits, whether or not attributable to capital gains earned by us. Non-corporate shareholders currently would be taxed on these dividends at capital gains rates; corporate shareholders may be eligible for the dividends received deduction with respect to such dividends. Unless entitled to relief under specific statutory provisions, we will also be disqualified from taxation as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year during which we lost our qualification. There can be no assurance that we would be entitled to any statutory relief.

Tax Liabilities Inherited from Shurgard.    In connection with the Shurgard merger, our indirect subsidiary (“Merger Sub”) succeeded to the tax and other liabilities of Shurgard. If Shurgard failed to qualify as a real estate investment trust in any taxable year, it would have been subject to federal income tax (including any applicable alternative minimum tax) on its taxable income at regular corporate rates. Unless statutory relief provisions apply, Shurgard would have been disqualified from treatment as a real estate investment trust for the four taxable years following the year during which it lost qualification. Merger Sub, as successor to Shurgard, would be required to pay this tax. As is the case with Public Storage, qualification as a real estate investment trust required Shurgard to satisfy numerous requirements, some on an annual basis, others on a quarterly basis and still others on an ongoing basis, established under highly technical and complex Code provisions. As a condition to closing, tax counsel to Shurgard rendered an opinion relating to Shurgard’s REIT status and related tax matters.

If Shurgard were not to have qualified as a REIT at the time of the merger, Shurgard would have incurred a Federal corporate income tax liability in connection with the merger, which would have been treated as a taxable asset sale by Shurgard for Federal income tax purposes. The resulting gain subject to tax would have been equal to the excess of the value of the merger consideration and the Shurgard liabilities assumed by Merger Sub at the time of the merger over Shurgard’s adjusted tax basis in its assets at that time. Merger Sub, as the successor to Shurgard, would be obligated to pay this tax.

In addition, if Shurgard did not qualify as a REIT at any time during the 10 years preceding the Shurgard merger, even if it qualified as a REIT at the time of the merger, Shurgard would incur a Federal corporate income tax liability on an amount equal to the “built-in gain” that existed with respect to its assets at the time it “requalified” as a REIT prior to the merger. Again, Merger Sub, as the successor to Shurgard, would be obligated to pay this tax.

 

42


Table of Contents

Taxation of U.S. Shareholders

As used in the remainder of this discussion, the term “U.S. shareholder” means a beneficial owner of a Public Storage common share that is, for U.S. federal income tax purposes:

 

   

a citizen or resident, as defined in Section 7701(b) of the Code, of the United States;

 

   

a corporation, partnership, limited liability company or other entity treated as a corporation or partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes that was created or organized in or under the laws of the United States or of any State thereof or in the District of Columbia unless, in the case of a partnership or limited liability company, Treasury regulations provide otherwise;

 

   

an estate the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source; or

 

   

in general, a trust whose administration is subject to the primary supervision of a United States court and which has one or more U.S. persons who have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, to the extent provided in the Treasury regulations, certain trusts in existence on August 20, 1996, and treated as United States persons prior to this date that elect to continue to be treated as United States persons, shall also be considered U.S. shareholders.

If you hold our common shares and are not a U.S. shareholder, you are a “non-U.S. shareholder.” If a partnership holds our common shares, the tax treatment of a partner in the partnership will generally depend upon the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. If you are a partner of a partnership holding our common shares, you should consult your tax advisor regarding the tax consequences of the ownership and disposition of our common shares.

Distributions by Public Storage—General.    As long as we qualify as a REIT, distributions out of our current or accumulated earnings and profits that are not designated as capital gains dividends or “qualified dividend income” will be taxable to our taxable U.S. shareholders as ordinary income and will not be eligible for the dividends-received deduction in the case of U.S. shareholders that are corporations. For purposes of determining whether distributions to holders of common shares or equity shares are out of current or accumulated earnings and profits, our earnings and profits will be allocated first to our outstanding preferred shares and then to our outstanding common shares and equity shares.

To the extent that we make distributions in excess of our current and accumulated earnings and profits, these distributions will be treated first as a tax-free return of capital to each U.S. shareholder. This treatment will reduce the adjusted tax basis that each U.S. shareholder has in its shares for tax purposes by the amount of the distribution, but not below zero. Distributions in excess of a U.S. shareholder’s adjusted tax basis in its shares will be taxable as capital gains, provided that the shares have been held as a capital asset, and will be taxable as long-term capital gain if the shares have been held for more than one year. Dividends we declare in October, November, or December of any year and payable to a shareholder of record on a specified date in any of these months shall be treated as both paid by us and received by the shareholder on December 31 of that year, provided we actually pay the dividend on or before January 31 of the following calendar year.

Capital Gain Distributions.    We may elect to designate distributions of our net capital gain as “capital gain dividends.” Distributions that we properly designate as “capital gain dividends” will be taxable to our taxable U.S. shareholders as gain from the sale or disposition of a capital asset to the extent that such gain does not exceed our actual net capital gain for the taxable year. Designations made by us will only be effective to the extent that they comply with Revenue Ruling 89-81, which requires that distributions made to different classes of shares be composed proportionately of dividends of a particular type. If we designate any portion of a dividend as a capital gain dividend, a U.S. shareholder will receive an IRS Form 1099-DIV indicating the amount that will be taxable to the shareholder as capital gain. Corporate shareholders, however, may be required to treat up to 20% of some capital gain dividends as ordinary income.

 

43


Table of Contents

Instead of paying capital gain dividends, we may designate all or part of our net capital gain as “undistributed capital gain.” We will be subject to tax at regular corporate rates on any undistributed capital gain. A U.S. shareholder will include in its income as long-term capital gains its proportionate share of such undistributed capital gain and will be deemed to have paid its proportionate share of the tax paid by us on such undistributed capital gain and receive a credit or a refund to the extent that the tax paid by us exceeds the U.S. shareholder’s tax liability on the undistributed capital gain. A U.S. shareholder will increase the basis in its common shares by the difference between the amount of capital gain included in its income and the amount of tax it is deemed to have paid. A U.S. shareholder that is a corporation will appropriately adjust its earnings and profits for the retained capital gain in accordance with Treasury regulations to be prescribed by the IRS. Our earnings and profits will be adjusted appropriately.

We will classify portions of any designated capital gain dividend or undistributed capital gain as either:

(1) a 15% rate gain distribution, which would be taxable to non-corporate U.S. shareholders at a maximum rate of 15%; or

(2) an “unrecaptured Section 1250 gain” distribution, which would be taxable to non-corporate U.S. shareholders at a maximum rate of 25%.

We must determine the maximum amounts that we may designate as 15% and 25% rate capital gain dividends by performing the computation required by the Code as if the REIT were an individual whose ordinary income were subject to a marginal tax rate of at least 28%.

Recipients of capital gain dividends from us that are taxed at corporate income tax rates will be taxed at the normal corporate income tax rates on those dividends.

Qualified Dividend Income.    With respect to shareholders who are taxed at the rates applicable to individuals, we may elect to designate a portion of our distributions paid to shareholders as “qualified dividend income.” A portion of a distribution that is properly designated as qualified dividend income is taxable to non-corporate U.S. shareholders as capital gain, provided that the shareholder has held the common shares with respect to which the distribution is made for more than 60 days during the 121-day period beginning on the date that is 60 days before the date on which such common shares become ex-dividend with respect to the relevant distribution (or, in the case of preferred shares, for more than 90 days during the 181-period beginning on the date that is 90 days before such ex-dividend date where the dividend is attributable to a period or periods aggregating in excess of 366 days). The maximum amount of our distributions eligible to be designated as qualified dividend income for a taxable year is equal to the sum of:

(1) the qualified dividend income received by us during such taxable year from non-REIT “C” corporations (including our corporate subsidiaries, other than qualified REIT subsidiaries, and our taxable REIT subsidiaries);

(2) the excess of any “undistributed” REIT taxable income recognized during the immediately preceding year over the federal income tax paid by us with respect to such undistributed REIT taxable income; and

(3) the excess of any income recognized during the immediately preceding year attributable to the sale of a built-in-gain asset that was acquired in a carry-over basis transaction from a non-REIT “C” corporation over the federal income tax paid by us with respect to such built-in gain.

Generally, dividends that we receive will be treated as qualified dividend income for purposes of (1) above if the dividends are received from a domestic corporation (other than a REIT or a regulated investment company) or a “qualified foreign corporation” and specified holding period requirements and other requirements are met. A foreign corporation (other than a “passive foreign investment company”) will be a qualified foreign corporation if it is incorporated in a possession of the United States, the corporation is eligible for benefits of an income tax treaty with the United States that the Secretary of Treasury determines is satisfactory, or the stock of the foreign

 

44


Table of Contents

corporation on which the dividend is paid is readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States. We generally expect that an insignificant portion, if any, of our distributions will consist of qualified dividend income. If we designate any portion of a dividend as qualified dividend income, a U.S. shareholder will receive an IRS Form 1099-DIV indicating the amount that will be taxable to the shareholder as qualified dividend income.

Sunset of Reduced Tax Rate Provisions.    The applicable provisions of the federal income tax laws relating to the 15% rate of capital gain taxation and the applicability of capital gain rates for designated qualified dividend income of REITs are currently scheduled to “sunset” or revert back to provisions of prior law effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2010. Upon the sunset of the current provisions, all dividend income of REITs and non-REIT corporations would be taxable at ordinary income rates and the maximum capital gain tax rate for gains other than “unrecaptured section 1250 gains” would be increased (from 15% to 20%). The impact of this reversion is not discussed herein. Consequently, shareholders should consult their tax advisors regarding the effect of sunset provisions on an investment in common shares.

Other Tax Considerations.    Distributions we make and gain arising from the sale or exchange by a U.S. shareholder of our shares will not be treated as passive activity income. As a result, U.S. shareholders generally will not be able to apply any “passive losses” against this income or gain. Distributions we make, to the extent they do not constitute a return of capital, generally will be treated as investment income for purposes of computing the investment interest limitation. A U.S. shareholder may elect, depending on its particular situation, to treat capital gain dividends, capital gains from the disposition of shares and income designated as qualified dividend income as investment income for purposes of the investment interest limitation, in which case the applicable capital gains will be taxed at ordinary income rates. We will notify shareholders regarding the portions of our distributions for each year that constitute ordinary income, return of capital and qualified dividend income. U.S. shareholders may not include in their individual income tax returns any of our net operating losses or capital losses. Our operating or capital losses would be carried over by us for potential offset against future income, subject to applicable limitations.

Sales of Shares.    If a U.S. shareholder sells or otherwise disposes of its shares in a taxable transaction, it will recognize gain or loss for federal income tax purposes in an amount equal to the difference between the amount of cash and the fair market value of any property received on the sale or other disposition and the holder’s adjusted basis in the shares for tax purposes. This gain or loss will be a capital gain or loss if the shares have been held by the U.S. shareholder as a capital asset. The applicable tax rate will depend on the U.S. shareholder’s holding period in the asset (generally, if an asset has been held for more than one year, such gain or loss will be long-term capital gain or loss) and the U.S. shareholder’s tax bracket. A U.S. shareholder who is an individual or an estate or trust and who has long-term capital gain or loss will be subject to a maximum capital gain rate, which is currently 15%. The IRS has the authority to prescribe, but has not yet prescribed, regulations that would apply a capital gain tax rate of 25% (which is generally higher than the long-term capital gain tax rates for noncorporate shareholders) to a portion of capital gain realized by a noncorporate shareholder on the sale of REIT shares that would correspond to the REIT’s “unrecaptured Section 1250 gain.” In general, any loss recognized by a U.S. shareholder upon the sale or other disposition of common shares that have been held for six months or less, after applying the holding period rules, will be treated be such U.S. shareholders as a long-term capital loss, to the extent of distributions received by the U.S. shareholder from us that were required to be treated as long-term capital gains. Shareholders are advised to consult their tax advisors with respect to the capital gain liability.

Taxation of Tax-Exempt Shareholders

Provided that a tax-exempt shareholder, except certain tax-exempt shareholders described below, has not held its common shares as “debt financed property” within the meaning of the Code and the shares are not otherwise used in its trade or business, the dividend income from us and gain from the sale of our common shares will not be unrelated business taxable income, or UBTI to a tax-exempt shareholder. Generally, “debt financed

 

45


Table of Contents

property” is property, the acquisition or holding of which was financed through a borrowing by the tax-exempt shareholder.

For tax-exempt shareholders that are social clubs, voluntary employee benefit associations, supplemental unemployment benefit trusts, or qualified group legal services plans exempt from federal income taxation under Sections 501(c)(7), (c)(9), (c)(17) or (c)(20) of the Code, respectively, or single parent title-holding corporations exempt under Section 501(c)(2) and whose income is payable to any of the aforementioned tax-exempt organizations, income from an investment in Public Storage will constitute unrelated business taxable income unless the organization is able to properly claim a deduction for amounts set aside or placed in reserve for certain purposes so as to offset the income generated by its investment in our shares. These prospective investors should consult with their tax advisors concerning these set aside and reserve requirements.

Notwithstanding the above, however, a portion of the dividends paid by a “pension-held REIT” are treated as UBTI if received by any trust which is described in Section 401(a) of the Code, is tax-exempt under Section 501(a) of the Code and holds more than 10%, by value, of the interests in the REIT. A pension-held REIT includes any REIT if:

 

   

at least one of such trusts holds more than 25%, by value, of the interests in the REIT, or two or more of such trusts, each of which owns more than 10%, by value, of the interests in the REIT, hold in the aggregate more than 50%, by value, of the interests in the REIT; and

 

   

it would not have qualified as a REIT but for the fact that Section 856(h)(3) of the Code provides that shares owned by such trusts shall be treated, for purposes of the “not closely held” requirement, as owned by the beneficiaries of the trust, rather than by the trust itself.

The percentage of any REIT dividend from a “pension-held REIT” that is treated as UBTI is equal to the ratio of the UBTI earned by the REIT, treating the REIT as if it were a pension trust and therefore subject to tax on UBTI, to the total gross income of the REIT. An exception applies where the percentage is less than 5% for any year, in which case none of the dividends would be treated as UBTI. The provisions requiring pension trusts to treat a portion of REIT distributions as UBTI will not apply if the REIT is able to satisfy the “not closely held requirement” without relying upon the “look-through” exception with respect to pension trusts. As a result of certain limitations on the transfer and ownership of our shares contained in our organizational documents, we do not expect to be classified as a “pension-held REIT,” and accordingly, the tax treatment described above should be inapplicable to our tax-exempt shareholders.

U.S. Taxation of Non-U.S. Shareholders

The following discussion addresses the rules governing U.S. federal income taxation of the ownership and disposition of our common shares by non-U.S. shareholders. These rules are complex, and no attempt is made herein to provide more than a brief summary of such rules. Accordingly, the discussion does not address all aspects of U.S. federal income taxation and does not address state, local or foreign tax consequences that may be relevant to a non-U.S. shareholder in light of its particular circumstances.

Distributions by Public Storage.    As described in the discussion below, distributions paid by us with respect to our common shares will be treated for federal income tax purposes as either:

 

   

ordinary income dividends;

 

   

long-term capital gain; or

 

   

return of capital distributions.

This discussion assumes that our shares will continue to be considered regularly traded on an established securities market located in the U.S. for purposes of the “FIRPTA” provisions described below. If our shares are no longer regularly traded on an established securities market located in the U.S., the tax considerations described below would differ.

 

46


Table of Contents

Ordinary Income Dividends.    A distribution paid by us to a non-U.S. shareholder will be treated as an ordinary income dividend if the distribution is paid out of our current or accumulated earnings and profits and:

 

   

the distribution is not attributable to our net capital gain; or

 

   

the distribution is attributable to our net capital gain from the sale of “U.S. real property interests” and the non-U.S. shareholder owns 5% or less of the value of the relevant class of shares at all times during the 1-year period ending on the date of the distribution.

Ordinary dividends that are effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business of the non-U.S. shareholder will be subject to tax on a net basis (that is, after allowance for deductions) at graduated rates in the same manner as U.S. shareholders (including any applicable alternative minimum tax).

Generally, we will withhold and remit to the IRS 30% of dividend distributions (including distributions that may later be determined to have been made in excess of current and accumulated earnings and profits) that could not be treated as capital gain distributions with respect to the non-U.S. shareholder (and that are not deemed to be capital gain dividends for purposes of the FIRPTA withholding rules described below) unless:

 

   

a lower treaty rate applies and the non-U.S. shareholder files an IRS Form W-8BEN evidencing eligibility for that reduced treaty rate with us; or

 

   

the non-U.S. shareholder files an IRS Form W-8ECI with us claiming that the distribution is income effectively connected with the non-U.S. shareholder’s trade or business.

Return of Capital Distributions.    A distribution in excess of our current and accumulated earnings and profits will be taxable to a non-U.S. shareholder, if at all, as gain from the sale of common shares to the extent that the distribution exceeds the non-U.S. shareholder’s basis in its common shares. A distribution in excess of our current and accumulated earnings and profits will reduce the non-U.S. shareholder’s basis in its common shares and will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax.

We may be required to withhold at least 10% of any distribution in excess of our current and accumulated earnings and profits, even if a lower treaty rate applies and the non-U.S. shareholder is not liable for tax on the receipt of that distribution. However, the non-U.S. shareholder may seek a refund of these amounts from the IRS if the non-U.S. shareholder’s U.S. tax liability with respect to the distribution is less than the amount withheld.

Capital Gain Dividends.    A distribution paid by us to a non-U.S. shareholder will be treated as long-term capital gain if the distribution is paid out of our current or accumulated earnings and profits and:

 

   

the distribution is attributable to our net capital gain (other than from the sale of “U.S. real property interests”) and we timely designate the distribution as a capital gain dividend; or

 

   

the distribution is attributable to our net capital gain from the sale of “U.S. real property interests” and the non-U.S. shareholder owns more than 5% of the value of the relevant class of shares at any point during the one-year period ending on the date of the distribution.

Due to recent amendments to the REIT taxation provisions in the Code, it is not entirely clear whether designated capital gain dividends described in the first bullet point above (that is, distributions attributable to net capital gain from sources other than the sale of “U.S. real property interests”) that are paid to non-U.S. shareholders who own less than 5% of the value of the relevant class of shares at all times during the one-year period ending on the date of the distribution will be treated as long-term capital gain to such non-U.S. shareholders. If we were to pay such a capital gain dividend, non-U.S. shareholders should consult their tax advisors regarding the taxation of such distribution. Long-term capital gain that a non-U.S. shareholder is deemed to receive from a capital gain dividend that is not attributable to the sale of “U.S. real property interests” generally will not be subject to U.S. tax in the hands of the non-U.S. shareholder unless:

 

   

the non-U.S. shareholder’s investment in our common shares is effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business of the non-U.S. shareholder, in which case the non-U.S. shareholder will be subject to the

 

47


Table of Contents
 

same treatment as U.S. shareholders with respect to any gain, except that a non-U.S. shareholder that is a corporation also may be subject to the 30% branch profits tax; or

 

   

the non-U.S. shareholder is a nonresident alien individual who is present in the United States for 183 days or more during the taxable year and has a “tax home” in the United States in which case the nonresident alien individual will be subject to a 30% tax on his capital gains.

Under the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act, referred to as “FIRPTA,” distributions that are attributable to net capital gain from the sales by us of U.S. real property interests and paid to a non-U.S. shareholder that owns more than 5% of the value of the relevant class of shares at any time during the one-year period ending on the date of the distribution will be subject to U.S. tax as income effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business. The FIRPTA tax will apply to these distributions whether or not the distribution is designated as a capital gain dividend.

Any distribution paid by us that is treated as a capital gain dividend or that could be treated as a capital gain dividend with respect to a particular non-U.S. shareholder that owns more than 5% of the value of the relevant class of shares at any time during the one-year period ending on the date of the distribution will be subject to special withholding rules under FIRPTA. We will be required to withhold and remit to the IRS 35% of any distribution that could be treated as a capital gain dividend with respect to the non-U.S. shareholder, whether or not the distribution is attributable to the sale by us of U.S. real property interests. The amount withheld is creditable against the non-U.S. shareholder’s U.S. federal income tax liability or refundable when the non-U.S. shareholder properly and timely files a tax return with the IRS.

Undistributed Capital Gain.    Although the law is not entirely clear on the matter, it appears that amounts designated by us as undistributed capital gains in respect of our shares held by non-U.S. shareholders generally should be treated in the same manner as actual distributions by us of capital gain dividends. Under that approach, the non-U.S. shareholder would be able to offset as a credit against their U.S. federal income tax liability resulting therefrom their proportionate share of the tax paid by us on the undistributed capital gains treated as long-term capital gain to the non-U.S. shareholder, and generally to receive from the IRS a refund to the extent their proportionate share of the tax paid by us were to exceed the non-U.S. shareholder’s actual U.S. federal income tax liability on such long-term capital gain. If we were to designate any portion of our net capital gain as undistributed capital gain, a non-U.S. shareholder should consult its tax advisor regarding the taxation of such undistributed capital gain.

Sale of Common Shares.    Gain recognized by a non-U.S. shareholder upon the sale or exchange of our common shares generally would not be subject to U.S. taxation unless:

(1) the investment in our common shares is effectively connected with the non-U.S. shareholder’s United States trade or business, in which case the non-U.S. shareholder will be subject to the same treatment as domestic shareholders with respect to any gain;

(2) the non-U.S. shareholder is a nonresident alien individual who is present in the United States for 183 days or more during the taxable year and has a “tax home” in the United States, in which case the nonresident alien individual will be subject to a 30% tax on the individual’s net capital gains from United States sources for the taxable year; or

(3) our common shares constitute a U.S. real property interest within the meaning of FIRPTA, as described below.

Our common shares will not constitute a U.S. real property interest if we are a domestically controlled REIT. We will be a domestically controlled REIT if, at all times during a specified testing period, less than 50% in value of our common shares is held directly or indirectly by non-U.S. shareholders.

We believe that we will be a domestically controlled REIT and, therefore, that the sale of our common shares by a non-U.S. shareholder would not be subject to taxation under FIRPTA. Because our common shares are publicly traded, however, we cannot guarantee that we are or will continue to be a domestically controlled REIT.

 

48


Table of Contents

Even if we do not qualify as a domestically controlled REIT at the time a non-U.S. shareholder sells our common shares, gain arising from the sale still would not be subject to FIRPTA tax if:

(1) the class or series of shares sold is considered regularly traded under applicable Treasury regulations on an established securities market, such as the New York Stock Exchange; and

(2) the selling non-U.S. shareholder owned, actually or constructively, 5% or less in value of the outstanding class or series of shares being sold throughout the shorter of the period during which the non-U.S. shareholders held such class or series of shares or the five-year period ending on the date of the sale or exchange.

If gain on the sale or exchange of our common shares by a non-U.S. shareholder were subject to taxation under FIRPTA, the non-U.S. shareholder would be subject to regular U.S. federal income tax with respect to any gain on a net basis in the same manner as a taxable U.S. shareholder, subject to any applicable alternative minimum tax and special alternative minimum tax in the case of nonresident alien individuals.

Information Reporting and Backup Withholding Tax Applicable to Shareholders

U.S. Shareholders.    In general, information-reporting requirements will apply to payments of distributions on our common shares and payments of the proceeds of the sale of our common shares to some U.S. shareholders, unless an exception applies. Further, the payer will be required to withhold backup withholding tax on such payments at the rate of 28% if:

(1) the payee fails to furnish a taxpayer identification number, or TIN, to the payer or to establish an exemption from backup withholding;

(2) the IRS notifies the payer that the TIN furnished by the payee is incorrect;

(3) there has been a notified payee under-reporting with respect to interest, dividends or original issue discount described in Section 3406(c) of the Code; or

(4) there has been a failure of the payee to certify under the penalty of perjury that the payee is not subject to backup withholding under the Code.

Some shareholders, including corporations, may be exempt from backup withholding. Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules from a payment to a shareholder will be allowed as a credit against the shareholder’s U.S. federal income tax liability and may entitle the shareholder to a refund, provided that the required information is furnished to the IRS.

Non-U.S. Shareholders.    Generally, information reporting will apply to payments of distributions on our common shares, and backup withholding described above for a U.S. shareholder will apply, unless the payee certifies that it is not a U.S. person or otherwise establishes an exemption.

The payment of the proceeds from the disposition of our common shares to or through the United States office of a United States or foreign broker will be subject to information reporting and, possibly, backup withholding as described above for U.S. shareholders, or the withholding tax for non-U.S. shareholders, as applicable, unless the non-U.S. shareholder certifies as to its non-U.S. status or otherwise establishes an exemption, provided that the broker does not have actual knowledge that the shareholder is a U.S. person or that the conditions of any other exemption are not, in fact, satisfied. The proceeds of the disposition by a non-U.S. shareholder of our common shares to or through a foreign office of a broker generally will not be subject to information reporting or backup withholding. However, if the broker is a U.S. person, a controlled foreign corporation for United States tax purposes, or a foreign person 50% or more of whose gross income from all sources for specified periods is from activities that are effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business, a foreign partnership 50% or more of whose interests are held by partners who are U.S. persons, or a foreign partnership that is engaged in the conduct of a trade or business in the United States, then information reporting generally will apply as though the payment was made

 

49


Table of Contents

through a U.S. office of a United States or foreign broker unless the broker has documentary evidence as to the non-U.S. shareholder’s foreign status and has no actual knowledge to the contrary.

Applicable Treasury regulations provide presumptions regarding the status of shareholders when payments to the shareholders cannot be reliably associated with appropriate documentation provided to the payer. If a non-U.S. shareholder fails to comply with the information reporting requirement, payments to such person may be subject to the full withholding tax even if such person might have been eligible for a reduced rate of withholding or no withholding under an applicable income tax treaty. Because the application of these Treasury regulations varies depending on the shareholder’s particular circumstances, you are urged to consult your tax advisor regarding the information reporting requirements applicable to you.

Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Any amounts that we withhold under the backup withholding rules will be refunded or credited against the non-U.S. shareholder’s federal income tax liability if certain required information is furnished to the IRS. Non-U.S. shareholders should consult with their tax advisors regarding application of backup withholding in their particular circumstances and the availability of and procedure for obtaining an exemption from backup withholding under current Treasury regulations.

Other Tax Consequences for Public Storage and Our Shareholders

We may be required to pay tax in various state or local jurisdictions, including those in which we transact business, and our shareholders may be required to pay tax in various state or local jurisdictions, including those in which they reside. Our state and local tax treatment may not conform to the federal income tax consequences discussed above. In addition, a shareholder’s state and local tax treatment may not conform to the federal income tax consequences discussed above. Consequently, prospective investors should consult with their tax advisors regarding the effect of state and local tax laws on an investment in our common shares.

A portion of our income is earned through our taxable REIT subsidiaries. The taxable REIT subsidiaries are subject to federal, state and local income tax at the full applicable corporate rates. In addition, a taxable REIT subsidiary will be limited in its ability to deduct interest payments in excess of a certain amount made directly or indirectly to us. To the extent that our taxable REIT subsidiaries and we are required to pay federal, state or local taxes, we will have less cash available for distribution to shareholders.

Tax Shelter Reporting

If a holder recognizes a loss as a result of a transaction with respect to our shares of at least (i) for a holder that is an individual, S corporation, trust or a partnership with at least one noncorporate partner, $2 million or more in a single taxable year or $4 million or more in a combination of taxable years, or (ii) for a holder that is either a corporation or a partnership with only corporate partners, $10 million or more in a single taxable year or $20 million or more in a combination of taxable years, such holder may be required to file a disclosure statement with the IRS on Form 8886. Direct shareholders of portfolio securities are in many cases exempt from this reporting requirement, but shareholders of a REIT currently are not excepted. The fact that a loss is reportable under these regulations does not affect the legal determination of whether the taxpayer’s treatment of the loss is proper. Shareholders should consult their tax advisors to determine the applicability of these regulations in light of their individual circumstances.

 

50


Table of Contents

LEGAL OPINIONS

In connection with particular offerings of the securities in the future, and if stated in the applicable prospectus supplement, the validity of those securities and certain U.S. federal income tax matters may be passed upon for us by Hogan & Hartson L.L.P., and for the underwriters or agents by counsel named in the applicable prospectus supplement.

EXPERTS

The consolidated financial statements of Public Storage appearing in Public Storage’s Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2006 (including schedules appearing therein) and Public Storage’s management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006 included in Public Storage, Inc.’s Form 10-K/A, which did not include an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of Shurgard Self Storage SCA and subsidiaries, have been audited by Ernst & Young L.L.P., independent registered public accounting firm, as set forth in its reports thereon, which as to the report on internal control over financial reporting contains an explanatory paragraph describing the above referenced exclusion of Shurgard Self Storage SCA and subsidiaries from the scope of management’s assessment and such firm’s audit of internal control over financial reporting included therein, and incorporated therein by reference. Such consolidated financial statements and management’s assessment have been incorporated herein by reference in reliance upon such reports given on the authority of such firm as experts in accounting and auditing.

The consolidated financial statements of Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc. as of December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 and for each of the three fiscal years in the period ended December 31, 2005 and Shurgard management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting (which is included in Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting) as of December 31, 2005 included in this prospectus have been so included in reliance upon the report of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, given on the authority of said firm as experts in accounting and auditing.

The consolidated balance sheets of Shurgard Self Storage S.C.A. as of December 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001 and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of three years in the period ended December 31, 2003, have been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, independent auditors, as stated in their report (including explanatory paragraphs for a change in the method of accounting for derivatives and goodwill, as well as the effects of the restatement), which is included in this prospectus, and have been so included in reliance upon the report of such firm given on their authority as experts in accounting and auditing.

SHURGARD’S MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON

INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

Shurgard’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

Shurgard’s management has assessed the effectiveness of Shurgard’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, using the criteria described in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (or the COSO criteria). Based on its assessment, Shurgard’s management has concluded, as of December 31, 2005, Shurgard maintained effective internal control over financial reporting.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has audited Shurgard’s management’s assessment of the effectiveness of Shurgard’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, as stated in their report, which appears herein.

 

51


Table of Contents

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF

SHURGARD STORAGE CENTERS, INC.

 

     Page

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

   F-2

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2005 and 2004

   F-4

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003

   F-5

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity as of December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003

   F-6

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003

   F-7

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

   F-9

Schedule III—Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation

   F-49

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 (unaudited)

   F-73

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 (unaudited)

  

F-74

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 (unaudited)

  

F-76

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

   F-78
SHURGARD SELF STORAGE SCA   
      Page

Independent Auditors’ Report

   F-107

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 and 2001

   F-108

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001

   F-109

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001

   F-110

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001

   F-111

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

   F-112

 

F-1


Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and the Shareholders of Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc.:

We have completed integrated audits of Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc.’s 2005 and 2004 consolidated financial statements and of its internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, and an audit of its 2003 consolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Our opinions, based on our audits and the report of other auditors, are presented below.

Consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule

In our opinion, based on our audits and the report of other auditors on the Shurgard Self Storage, SCA financial statements as of December 31, 2003, the consolidated financial statements listed in the accompanying index present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc. and its subsidiaries at December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, based on our audits, the financial statement schedule listed in the accompanying index presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits. We did not audit the financial statements of Shurgard Self Storage, SCA, an investment accounted for under the equity method, which statements reflect total shareholders’ equity of $137.6 million as of December 31, 2003 and net loss of $29.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2003. Those statements were audited by other auditors whose report thereon has been furnished to us, and our opinion expressed herein, insofar as it relates to the amounts included for Shurgard Self Storage, SCA, is based solely on the report of the other auditors. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit of financial statements includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits and the report of other auditors provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

As described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company adopted FASB Interpretation No. 46R, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, in 2004.

Internal control over financial reporting

Also, in our opinion, based on our audit, management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005 based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on those criteria. Furthermore, in our opinion, based on our audit, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the COSO. The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express opinions on management’s assessment and on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We conducted our audit of internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight

 

F-2


Table of Contents

Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. An audit of internal control over financial reporting includes obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we consider necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinions.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Seattle, Washington

March 20, 2006, except with respect to our opinions on the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule insofar as they relate to the effects of the discontinued operations as discussed in Note 25, as to which the date is May 23, 2006.

 

F-3


Table of Contents

SHURGARD STORAGE CENTERS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands except share and per share data)

 

     As of December 31,  
     2005     2004  

ASSETS

    

Storage centers:

    

Operating storage centers

   $ 3,244,258     $ 3,143,488  

Less accumulated depreciation

     (552,171 )     (479,531 )
                

Operating storage centers, net

     2,692,087       2,663,957  

Construction in progress

     67,073       58,431  

Properties held for sale

     6,774       8,328  
                

Total storage centers

     2,765,934       2,730,716  
                

Cash and cash equivalents

     39,778       50,277  

Restricted cash

     4,972       7,181  

Goodwill

     27,440       24,206  

Other assets

     119,248       128,204  
                

Total assets

   $ 2,957,372     $ 2,940,584  
                

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

    

Accounts payable and other liabilities

   $ 181,435     $ 180,652  

Lines of credit

     583,500       397,300  

Notes payable

     1,275,720       1,287,202  
                

Total liabilities

     2,040,655       1,865,154  
                

Minority interest

     116,365       169,232  

Commitments and contingencies (Note 22)

    

Shareholders’ equity:

    

Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock; $0.001 par value; 2,000,000 shares authorized; 2,000,000 shares issued and outstanding; liquidation preference of $50,000

     48,115       48,115  

Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock; $0.001 par value; 3,450,000 shares authorized; 3,450,000 shares issued and outstanding; liquidation preference of $86,250

     83,068       83,068  

Class A Common Stock, $0.001 par value; 120,000,000 authorized; 47,041,680 and 46,624,900 shares issued and outstanding, respectively

     47       47  

Additional paid-in capital

     1,142,288       1,127,138  

Accumulated deficit

     (459,586 )     (354,985 )

Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income

     (13,580 )     2,815  
                

Total shareholders’ equity

     800,352       906,198  
                

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

   $ 2,957,372     $ 2,940,584  
                

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

 

F-4


Table of Contents

SHURGARD STORAGE CENTERS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(in thousands except share and per share data)

 

    

For the year ended

December 31,

 
     2005     2004     2003  

Revenue

      

Storage center operations

   $ 478,970     $ 419,187     $ 291,085  

Other

     4,922       5,101       6,877  
                        

Total revenue

     483,892       424,288       297,962  
                        

Expenses

      

Operating

     233,006       211,380       125,880  

Real estate development

     10,042       4,991       23  

Depreciation and amortization

     95,722       87,503       55,537  

Impairment and abandoned project expense

     3,354       2,856       13,889  

General, administrative and other

     35,318       32,961       18,012  
                        

Total storage center expenses

     377,442       339,691       213,341  
                        

Income from operations

     106,450       84,597       84,621  
                        

Other Income (Expense)

      

Costs related to takeover proposal and exploration of strategic alternatives (Note 22)

     (13,775 )     —         —    

Interest expense

     (105,584 )     (82,876 )     (51,182 )

Amortization of participation rights discount

     —         1,123       5,529  

Loss on derivatives, net

     (2,122 )     (615 )     (2,194 )

Foreign exchange (loss) gain

     (9,665 )     6,247       (431 )

Interest income and other, net

     3,746       4,361       4,887  
                        

Other expense, net

     (127,400 )     (71,760 )     (43,391 )
                        

(Loss) income before minority interest, equity in earnings of other real estate investments, net and income tax expense

     (20,950 )     12,837       41,230  

Minority interest

     20,936       16,608       (1,206 )

Equity in earnings (losses) of other real estate investments, net

     60       93       (3,099 )

Income tax expense

     (636 )     (72 )     (1,611 )
                        

(Loss) income from continuing operations

     (590 )     29,466       35,314  
                        

Discontinued operations

      

Income from discontinued operations

     418       1,942       2,324  

Gain on sale of discontinued operations

     11,831       16,226       —    
                        

Total discontinued operations

     12,249       18,168       2,324  
                        

Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle

     —         (2,339 )     —    
                        

Net Income

     11,659       45,295       37,638  

Net Income Allocation

      

Preferred stock dividends and other

     (12,153 )     (12,193 )     (12,082 )
                        

Net (loss) income available to common shareholders

   $ (494 )   $ 33,102     $ 25,556  
                        

Basic per share amounts:

      

(Loss) income from continuing operations available to common shareholders

   $ (0.27 )   $ 0.37     $ 0.57  

Discontinued operations

     0.26       0.40       0.06  

Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle

     —         (0.05 )     —    
                        

Net (loss) income available to common shareholders per share

   $ (0.01 )   $ 0.72     $ 0.63  
                        

Diluted per share amounts:

      

(Loss) income from continuing operations available to common shareholders

   $ (0.27 )   $ 0.37     $ 0.56  

Discontinued operations

     0.26       0.39       0.06  

Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle

     —         (0.05 )     —    
                        

Net (loss) income available to common shareholders per share

   $ (0.01 )   $ 0.71     $ 0.62  
                        

Distributions per common share

   $ 2.23     $ 2.19     $ 2.15  
                        

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

 

F-5


Table of Contents

SHURGARD STORAGE CENTERS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(in thousands)

 

    Preferred Stock   Class A
Common Stock
 

Additional

Paid-in
Capital

  Accumulated
Deficit
    Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
    Total  
    Shares   Amount   Shares   Amount        

Balance, January 1, 2003

  5,450   $ 131,183   35,934   $ 36   $ 804,582   $ (225,811 )   $ (2,734 )   $ 707,256  

Comprehensive income (1)

              37,638       12,492       50,130  

Issuance of common stock

      9,814     10     296,367         296,377  

Distributions:

               

Preferred

              (11,896 )       (11,896 )

Common

  —       —     —       —       —       (87,447 )     —         (87,447 )
                                                 

Balance, December 31, 2003

  5,450     131,183   45,748     46     1,100,949     (287,516 )     9,758       954,420  

Comprehensive income (loss) (1)

              45,295       (6,943 )     38,352  

Issuance of common stock

      877     1     26,189         26,190  

Distributions:

               

Preferred

              (11,897 )       (11,897 )

Common

  —       —     —       —       —       (100,867 )     —         (100,867 )
                                                 

Balance, December 31, 2004

  5,450     131,183   46,625     47     1,127,138     (354,985 )     2,815       906,198  

Comprehensive income (loss) (1)

              11,659       (16,395 )     (4,736 )

Issuance of common stock

      417     —       15,150         15,150  

Distributions:

               

Preferred

              (11,897 )       (11,897 )

Common

  —       —     —       —       —       (104,363 )     —         (104,363 )
                                                 

Balance, December 31, 2005

  5,450   $ 131,183   47,042   $ 47   $ 1,142,288   $ (459,586 )   $ (13,580 )   $ 800,352  
                                                 

(1) See Note 2 for components of other comprehensive income (loss).

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

 

F-6


Table of Contents

SHURGARD STORAGE CENTERS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)

 

     For the year ended December 31,  
     2005     2004     2003  

Operating activities:

      

Net income

   $ 11,659     $ 45,295     $ 37,638  

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

      

Gain on sale of assets, including discontinued operations

     (12,850 )     (16,689 )     (2,489 )

Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle

     —         2,339       —    

Depreciation, amortization and impairment losses

     96,242       88,209       69,051  

Loss on derivatives, net

     2,122       615       2,194  

Stock-based compensation expense

     2,751       3,433       1,150  

Equity in earnings of other real estate investments, net

     (60 )     (93 )     3,099  

Non-cash interest and other

     10,454       7,017       (1,376 )

Foreign exchange loss (gain)

     9,523       (6,247 )     431  

Minority interest

     (20,936 )     (16,608 )     1,206  

Changes in operating accounts, net of effect of acquisitions:

      

Other assets

     (2,809 )     (3,816 )     7,968  

Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities

     20,056       19,286       4,826  
                        

Net cash provided by operating activities

     116,152       122,741       123,698  
                        

Investing activities:

      

Construction and improvements to storage centers

     (166,886 )     (209,294 )     (97,482 )

Acquisitions of storage centers, including associated intangible assets

     (35,659 )     (20,887 )     —    

Purchase of intangible assets

     (5,268 )     (3,548 )     (379 )

Proceeds from sale of assets

     26,293       30,071       5,725  

Changes in restricted cash, net

     1,610       (3,046 )     (355 )

Increase in notes receivable

     (4,429 )     (5,617 )     (6,315 )

Purchase of additional interest in European affiliated partnerships

     (97,847 )     (5,285 )     (309,068 )

Increase in cash due to consolidation of Shurgard Europe

     —         32,877       —    

Purchase of additional interest in affiliated partnerships

     —         (2,457 )     (245 )
                        

Net cash used in investing activities

     (282,186 )     (187,186 )     (408,119 )
                        

 

F-7


Table of Contents

SHURGARD STORAGE CENTERS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS—(Continued)

(in thousands)

 

     For the year ended December 31,  
     2005     2004     2003  

Financing activities:

      

Proceeds from notes payable

     78,718       556,763       237,047  

Payments on notes payable

     (4,564 )     (96,500 )     (55,789 )

Proceeds from lines of credit

     1,056,500       427,000       589,695  

Payments on lines of credit

     (870,300 )     (676,949 )     (594,114 )

Payment of loan costs

     (7,638 )     (2,621 )     (1,276 )

Payments on participation rights

     —         (39,500 )     (1,320 )

Distributions paid on common and preferred stock

     (113,284 )     (112,764 )     (99,343 )

Payments on derivatives

     (15,999 )     —         —    

Proceeds from derivatives

     1,114       —         —    

Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net

     —         —         178,236  

Proceeds from payments on loans to shareholders

     —         —         20,000  

Proceeds from exercise of stock options and dividend reinvestment plan

     7,821       21,491       12,858  

Contributions received from minority partners

     32,006       29,403       226  

Distributions paid to minority partners

     (4,634 )     (6,956 )     (3,097 )
                        

Net cash provided by financing activities

     159,740       99,367       283,123  
                        

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

     (4,205 )     3,685       —    
                        

(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents

     (10,499 )     38,607       (1,298 )

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

     50,277       11,670       12,968  
                        

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

   $ 39,778     $ 50,277     $ 11,670  
                        

Supplemental schedule of cash flow information:

      

Cash paid for interest, net of amounts capitalized

   $ 98,412     $ 71,791     $ 47,272  
                        

Cash paid for income taxes

   $ 1,746     $ (40 )   $ 3,358  
                        

Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing information:

      

Common stock issued in acquisition of storage centers

   $ 5,490     $ 1,936     $ 84,134  
                        

Notes receivable forgiven in the acquisition of storage centers

   $ 6,727     $ —       $ —    
                        

Contributions from minority interest partners

   $ —       $ 3,635     $ 2,336  
                        

Minority interests granted in acquisition of storage centers

   $ 4,475     $ —       $ —    
                        

Supplemental schedule of non-cash financing information:

      

Preferred dividends declared but not paid

   $ 2,976     $ —       $ —    
                        

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

 

F-8


Table of Contents

SHURGARD STORAGE CENTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1—Description of the Business

Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc. and our subsidiaries (the “Company,” “we,” “Shurgard” or “us”) are engaged principally in investing in, acquiring, developing and operating self-storage centers located in markets throughout the United States and in Western Europe. Our revenues are generated primarily from leasing self-storage space to tenants on a month-to-month basis. We also provide ancillary services at our storage centers consisting primarily of truck rentals and sales of storage products. Prior to January 1, 2004, we did not consolidate Shurgard Self Storage, SCA (Shurgard Europe) and its subsidiaries in our financial statements. Instead, we accounted for our investments in these entities under the equity method of accounting.

Note 2—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of presentation:    The consolidated financial statements are presented on an accrual basis in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) and include the accounts of Shurgard and our consolidated subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Any references to the number of properties and square footage in the consolidated financial statement notes are unaudited.

Consolidated and unconsolidated subsidiaries:    We consolidate all wholly-owned subsidiaries. We assess whether our subsidiaries are Variable Interest Entities (VIEs) as defined by the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (FASB) Interpretation No. (FIN) 46R, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities.” Since January 1, 2004, we consolidate all VIEs of which we are the primary beneficiary. Partially-owned subsidiaries and joint ventures that are not VIEs are consolidated when we control the entity. Through June 30, 2005, we evaluated partially-owned subsidiaries and joint ventures held in partnership form in accordance with the provisions of Statement of Position (SOP) 78-9, “Accounting for Investments in Real Estate Ventures,” to determine whether the rights held by other investors constitute “important rights” as defined therein. Since July 1, 2005, we evaluate such rights in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 04-5, “Determining Whether a General Partner, or the General Partners as a Group, Controls a Limited Partnership or Similar Entity When the Limited Partners Have Certain Rights.” For partially-owned subsidiaries or joint ventures held in corporate form (including limited liability companies with governance provisions that are the functional equivalent of regular corporations), we consider the guidance of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 94, “Consolidation of All Majority-Owned Subsidiaries” and EITF Issue No. 96-16, “Investor’s Accounting for an Investee When the Investor has a Majority of the Voting Interest but the Minority Shareholder or Shareholders Have Certain Approval or Veto Rights” and, in particular, whether rights held by other investors would be viewed as “participating rights” as defined therein. To the extent that any minority investor has substantive participating rights, has the ability to dissolve the partnership or remove the general partner without cause in a partnership or participating rights in a corporation, including substantive veto rights, the related entity will generally not be consolidated.

We account for unconsolidated subsidiaries and joint ventures over which we have significant influence using the equity method. In applying the equity method, our proportionate share of intercompany profits is eliminated as a component of equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities.

Foreign operations:    The functional currency of each of our European subsidiaries, and their subsidiaries, is the local currency of the country in which the entity has operations (euro for members of the European Union that have adopted the euro, Krona for Sweden, Pound Sterling for the United Kingdom, and Krone for Denmark). Assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rate in effect as of the end of each period and income statement accounts are re-measured at the average exchange rate for each period. Additionally, Recom SNC (Recom), a consolidated foreign entity with a U.S. dollar functional currency, has transactions that are

 

F-9


Table of Contents

SHURGARD STORAGE CENTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

denominated in currencies other than U.S. dollars. For Recom, non-monetary assets and liabilities are converted to U.S dollars at historical exchange rates, monetary assets and liabilities are re-measured at the exchange rate in effect as of the end of the period and income statement accounts are re-measured at the average exchange rate for the period.

The results of our operations and our financial position are affected by the fluctuations in the value of the euro, and to a lesser extent, other European currencies, against the U.S. dollar. We recognize the effects of foreign currency exchange variances on our European assets, liabilities and equity as a currency translation adjustment in other comprehensive income (loss). We include gains and losses from foreign currency transactions, such as those resulting from the settlement of foreign receivables or payables on intercompany transactions, in net income. Also, we are exposed to foreign currency exchange risk related to intercompany debt with or between our European subsidiaries that are not denominated in the functional currency of the subsidiary or the investee. We recognize the effects of foreign currency on such debt in net income when we expect to settle the debt and in other comprehensive income when the debt is considered to be of a long-term investment nature.

Use of estimates:    The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the amounts of revenues and expenses recognized during the reporting period. Significant estimates are inherent in the preparation of our financial statements and include the evaluation of impairment of long-lived assets and goodwill, valuation allowance for deferred tax assets, estimated lives of depreciable and amortizable assets, the allocation of the purchase price of acquired properties and legal liabilities. Actual results could differ from these and other estimates.

Reclassifications:    We have reclassified certain prior year amounts to conform to the current presentation with no effect on shareholders’ equity, net income or net cash-flows from operating, investing and financing activities.

Storage centers:    We carry storage centers to be developed or held and used in operations at depreciated cost, reduced for impairment losses where appropriate. We capitalize acquisition, development and construction costs of properties in development in accordance with SFAS No. 67, “Accounting for Costs and Initial Rental Operations of Real Estate Projects,” and include, where applicable, salaries and related costs, real estate taxes, interest, lease expense and preconstruction costs directly related to the project. The preconstruction stage of development of a storage center (or redevelopment of an existing storage center) includes efforts to secure land control and zoning, to evaluate feasibility and to complete other initial tasks that are essential to development. Costs of preconstruction efforts incurred prior to projects being considered probable to be completed are charged as real estate development expenses as incurred. We record abandonment losses for previously capitalized costs of development projects when we assess that the completion of the project is no longer probable. We capitalize development and construction costs and costs of significant improvements and replacements and renovations at storage centers, while we expense costs of maintenance and repairs as we incur them.

We compute depreciation of each operating storage center using the straight-line method based on the shorter of an estimated useful life of 30 years or the lease term for storage centers built on leased land. We evaluate and if necessary, revise estimates of the useful lives of specific storage centers, when we plan to demolish or replace them. We depreciate equipment and furniture and fixtures based on estimated useful lives of three to six years.

If events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an operating storage center may be impaired, we conduct a recoverability analysis based on expected undiscounted cash flows to be generated from the

 

F-10


Table of Contents

SHURGARD STORAGE CENTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

property. If the analysis indicates that we cannot recover the carrying value from estimated future cash flows, we write down the property to its estimated fair value and recognize an impairment loss. We determine fair values based on expected future cash flows using appropriate market discount and capitalization rates.

We carry storage centers held for sale at the lower of their carrying value (i.e., cost less accumulated depreciation and any impairment loss recognized) or estimated fair value less costs to sell. We classify the net carrying values of properties as held for sale when the properties are actively marketed, their sale is considered probable within one year and various other criteria relating to their disposition are met. We discontinue depreciation of the operating storage centers at that time, but we continue to recognize operating revenues, operating expenses and interest expense until the date of sale. In accordance with SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” we report revenues and expense of properties classified as held for sale in discontinued operations for all periods presented if we will sell or have sold the properties on terms where we have no continuing involvement with them after the sale. If active marketing ceases or the properties no longer meet the criteria to be classified as held for sale, we reclassify the properties as held for use, resume depreciation and recognize the loss for the period that we classified the properties as held for sale, and we charge deferred selling costs, if any, to expense.

We recognize gains from sales of properties using the full accrual method provided that the terms of the transactions and any continuing involvement by us with the properties sold meet certain criteria. We defer gains relating to transactions that do not meet the established criteria and recognize them when the criteria are met, or using the installment or cost recovery methods, as appropriate in the circumstances. We account for other sales of interests in properties that are substantially financing arrangements as such.

Acquisitions of businesses and storage centers:    We allocate the purchase price of acquired storage centers and businesses to tangible and identified intangible assets based on their fair values. In making estimates of fair values for the purposes of allocating the purchase price, we rely primarily on our extensive knowledge of the market for storage centers and if considered appropriate, will consult with independent appraisers. In estimating the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets acquired, we also consider information obtained about each property as a result of our pre-acquisition due diligence, including independent appraisals that may be obtained in connection with the acquisition or financing of the respective assets.

The fair values of intangible assets include leases to customers with above market rents and in-place lease values. The fair values of these identifiable intangible assets are generally not significant, because substantially all leases in our business are month-to-month, and most customers use our facilities for less than one year. We expense internal costs related to the acquisition of a business, or an operating storage center, as we incur them.

We classify as goodwill any purchase price in excess of the value of acquired net tangible and identified intangible assets acquired in a business combination (including the acquisition of a minority interest in a business) or in the acquisition of a business and assign it to the reporting unit that expects to benefit from the acquisition. We test goodwill for impairment annually and whenever events or circumstances indicate that impairment may have occurred.

We evaluate acquisitions of businesses and storage centers from parties with whom we have a preexisting relationship to determine if a settlement of the preexisting relationship exists and, if so, we account for these acquisitions as multiple element transactions.

Cash and cash equivalents:    Cash equivalents consist of money market instruments and securities with original maturities of 90 days or less.

 

F-11


Table of Contents

SHURGARD STORAGE CENTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Restricted cash:    Restricted cash consists of cash deposits and represents expense reserves required by lenders or contractors and escrow deposits on pending real estate transactions or pending resolution of contingencies on the purchase price of completed real estate acquisitions.

Other assets:    Other assets include financing costs, non-compete agreements and computer software costs (see Note 7). We amortize financing costs over the life of the related debt using the effective interest or the straight-line method if it approximates the effective interest method and we include the related expense in interest expense. We amortize non-compete agreements over their estimated useful lives, which range from two to five years. We record internal-use computer software at cost less accumulated amortization and amortize it over the estimated useful life, which ranges from two to seven years. During the software application development stage, capitalized costs include external consulting costs, cost of software licenses, interest expense and internal payroll and payroll-related costs for employees who are directly associated with the software project. We expense software maintenance, training and data conversion costs in the period in which we incur them.

Self insurance:    We are self-insured for a portion of the risks associated with medical, dental and workmen’s compensation. We recognize liabilities for unpaid claims and claims adjustment expenses that represent our best estimate of the total obligation for reported claims plus those incurred but not reported (IBNR) and the related estimated claim settlement expenses for all claims incurred through December 31 of each year. We determine IBNR reserves for workmen’s compensation using actuarial methods that take into account historical loss experience data, industry statistics and additional qualitative factors, as appropriate. Additionally, we recognize a receivable for the estimated insurance reimbursement for any insured portion of the total liabilities.

Income taxes:    We have elected to be taxed as a Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT) pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. To qualify as a REIT, we must distribute annually to our shareholders at least 90% of our REIT taxable income and meet certain other requirements relating primarily to the nature of our assets and the sources of our revenues. As a REIT, we are not subject to U.S. Federal income taxes to the extent of distributions. We believe that we met the qualifications for REIT status at December 31, 2005 and intend to meet the qualifications in the future and to distribute at least 90% of our REIT taxable income to shareholders in 2006 and future years. We conduct our domestic non-REIT activities primarily through Shurgard TRS, Inc., a taxable REIT subsidiary. We conduct our foreign non-REIT activities primarily through six European taxable REIT subsidiaries. As a result, we have not provided for U.S. federal income taxes for the REIT in our financial statements. However, we do provide for U.S. federal income taxes for our domestic taxable REIT subsidiaries (TRSs). Additionally, both the REIT and our domestic TRSs are subject to certain state income taxes as well as franchise taxes in some jurisdictions. We also provide for income taxes of our European subsidiaries, which are subject to income taxes in the respective jurisdictions of the countries in which they operate.

We have deferred tax assets arising primarily from cumulative net operating losses arising in certain taxable subsidiaries. We evaluate both the positive and negative evidence that we believe is relevant in assessing whether we will realize the deferred tax assets. When we determine that it is more likely than not that we will not realize the tax asset either in part or in whole, we record a valuation allowance. One significant factor representing negative evidence in the evaluation of whether we will realize deferred tax assets arising from cumulative net operating losses is the historical taxable income or loss of the entity. In cases where a taxable entity has not demonstrated a history of achieving taxable income, this represents significant negative evidence in assessing whether we will realize the amounts and generally requires that we provide a valuation allowance.

Revenue recognition:    The majority of our customers rent under month-to-month lease agreements and we recognize revenue at the contracted rate for each month occupied. We recognize revenue related to customers

 

F-12


Table of Contents

SHURGARD STORAGE CENTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

who sign longer period leases ratably over the term of the lease. We recognize management fee revenue each month for which we render services. These contracts are generally cancelable by either party on specified advanced notice. Revenues are presented net of provisions for doubtful accounts of $6.8 million, $6.0 million and $5.0 million in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

We recognize, in other revenue, revenue on our profit sharing contracts related to our tenant insurance referral program based on the excess of premiums over estimated claims and administrative costs.

Capitalized interest:    We capitalize interest incurred during the construction period of storage centers and during the development period of internally developed computer software. We capitalize interest to the related assets using a weighted-average rate of our credit facilities and senior notes payable. For the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, we capitalized interest of $3.2 million, $2.7 million and $2.3 million, respectively.

Advertising costs:    We incur advertising costs primarily attributable to print advertisements in telephone books. We recognize the costs when the related telephone book is first published. We recognized $17.7 million, $17.3 million and $6.0 million in advertising expenses for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

Derivative financial instruments:    We use derivative financial instruments to reduce risks associated with movements in interest and foreign currency exchange rates. We may choose to reduce cash flow and earnings volatility associated with interest rate risk exposure on existing variable-rate borrowings or forecasted variable- and fixed-rate borrowings. In some instances, lenders may require us to do so. In order to limit interest rate risk on variable-rate borrowings, we may enter into interest rate swaps or interest rate caps to hedge specific risks. In order to limit interest rate risk on forecasted borrowings, we may enter into interest rate swaps, forward starting swaps, forward rate agreements, interest rate locks and interest rate collars. We may also use derivative financial instruments to reduce foreign currency exchange rate risks to our earnings, cash flows and financial position arising from forecasted intercompany foreign currency denominated transactions and net investments in certain foreign operations. In order to limit foreign currency exchange rate risks associated with forecasted intercompany foreign currency denominated transactions, we may enter into cross-currency interest rate swaps. In order to limit foreign currency exchange rate risks associated with net investments in foreign operations, we may enter into foreign currency forward contracts. We may also use derivative financial instruments to reduce earnings volatility associated with other derivative financial instruments that are not designated as cash flow hedges. We do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes.

Under purchased interest rate cap agreements, we make initial premium payments to the counterparties in exchange for the right to receive payments from them if interest rates exceed specified levels during the agreement period. Under sold interest rate cap agreements, we receive initial premium payments from the counterparties in exchange for the obligation to make payments to them if interest rates exceed specified levels during the agreement period. Under interest rate swap agreements, we and the counterparties agree to exchange the difference between fixed-rate and variable-rate interest amounts calculated by reference to specified notional principal amounts during the agreement period. Notional principal amounts are used to express the volume of these transactions, but the cash requirements and amounts subject to credit risk are substantially less.

Under cross currency interest rate swaps, we and the counterparties agree to exchange fixed amounts of foreign currencies calculated by reference to fixed interest rates and notional principal amounts during the agreement period. We also agree to exchange the notional amounts at the end of the agreement period. Under foreign currency forward contracts, we and the counterparties agree to exchange fixed amounts of foreign currencies at the end of the agreement period.

 

F-13


Table of Contents

SHURGARD STORAGE CENTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Parties to interest rate and foreign currency exchange agreements are subject to market risk for changes in interest rates and currency exchange rates and risk of credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the counterparty. We do not require any collateral under these agreements but deal only with highly rated financial institution counterparties (which, in certain cases, are also the lenders on the related debt) and expect that all counterparties will meet their obligations.

We measure derivative financial instruments at fair value and recognize these instruments as assets or liabilities on our balance sheet. We report changes in the values of the effective portions of derivative financial instruments designated as cash flow hedges and changes in the values of derivative financial instruments designated as economic hedges of net investments in foreign subsidiaries as components of other comprehensive income. We recognize changes in the values of the ineffective portions of cash flow hedges and all changes in the values of undesignated derivative financial instruments in earnings. We account for amounts receivable or payable under interest rate cap and swap agreements designated as cash flow hedges as adjustments to interest expense on the related debt. To qualify for hedge accounting, we must formally document the details of the hedging relationship at inception of the arrangement, including the risk management objective, hedging strategy, hedged item, specific risks that are being hedged, the derivative instrument and how we assess effectiveness. The derivative must be highly effective in offsetting either changes in fair value or cash flows, as appropriate, for the risk being hedged. We evaluate effectiveness on a retrospective and prospective basis based on quantitative measures of correlation. When we determine that a derivative has ceased to be highly effective as a hedge, we discontinue hedge accounting prospectively.

We discontinue hedge accounting prospectively when (i) we determine that the derivative is no longer effective in offsetting changes in the fair value or cash flows of a hedged item (including hedged items such as firm commitments or forecasted transactions); (ii) the derivative expires or is sold, terminated or exercised; (iii) it is no longer probable that the forecasted transaction will occur; (iv) a hedged firm commitment no longer meets the definition of a firm commitment; or (v) we determine that designating the derivative as a hedging instrument is no longer appropriate.

When we discontinue hedge accounting because we determine that the derivative no longer qualifies as an effective fair-value hedge, we will continue to carry the derivative on the balance sheet at its fair value but cease to adjust the hedged asset or liability for changes in fair value. When we discontinue hedge accounting because the hedged item no longer meets the definition of a firm commitment, we will continue to carry the derivative on the balance sheet at its fair value, removing from the balance sheet any asset or liability that we recorded to recognize the firm commitment and recording it as a gain or loss in current period earnings. When we discontinue hedge accounting because it is no longer probable that the forecasted transaction will occur in the originally expected period, the gain or loss on the derivative remains in accumulated other comprehensive income and we reclassify it into earnings when the forecasted transaction affects earnings. However, if it is probable that a forecasted transaction will not occur by the end of the originally specified time period or within an additional two month period of time thereafter, we immediately recognize in earnings the gains and losses that were accumulated in other comprehensive income. If we discontinue a cash flow hedge because the variability of the probable forecasted transaction has been eliminated, we will reclassify the net accumulated other comprehensive income to income over the term of the designated hedging relationship. Whenever we discontinue hedge accounting and the derivative remains outstanding, we will carry the derivative at its fair value on the balance sheet, recognizing changes in the fair value in current period earnings. Expenses recognized relating to changes in the time value of interest rate cap agreements were insignificant in 2005, 2004 and 2003.

 

F-14


Table of Contents

SHURGARD STORAGE CENTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Other comprehensive income:    The following tables summarize components of other comprehensive income:

 

     2005     2004     2003
     (in thousands)

Net income

   $ 11,659     $ 45,295     $ 37,638

Other comprehensive income (loss):

      

Derivatives designated as hedges

     440       (10,118 )     2,058

Currency translation adjustment

     (16,835 )     3,175       10,434
                      

Total other comprehensive (loss) income

     (16,395 )     (6,943 )     12,492
                      

Total comprehensive (loss) income

   $ (4,736 )   $ 38,352     $ 50,130
                      

The currency translation adjustment represents the net currency translation adjustment gains and losses related to our European subsidiaries. Amounts are presented net of minority interest.

Financial instruments:    The carrying values reflected on the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2005 and 2004 reasonably approximate the fair values of restricted cash, cash and cash equivalents, other assets, accounts payable and other liabilities, lines of credit and variable rate debt.

Based on the borrowing rates currently available to us for bank loans with similar terms and average maturities, we estimate the fair value of our fixed rate long-term debt was $648.8 million compared to a book value of $617.3 million at December 31, 2005. As of December 31, 2004, we estimated the fair value of our fixed rate long-term debt was $667.7 million compared to a book value of $619.5 million.

Financial assets that are exposed to credit risk consist primarily of accounts receivable and notes receivable. As of December 31, 2005 and 2004, notes receivable, which are included in other assets, consisted primarily of notes to finance the construction of certain properties and were secured by the properties. The carrying values of those notes approximate fair value, because the applicable interest rates approximate market rates for these loans. We adjust the value of notes that we consider are not collectible. In 2003, we recognized a $1.6 million impairment expense on the write-down of one note receivable. Accounts receivable from customers are included in other assets (see Note 7), and are not a significant component of total assets. Accounts are deemed past due based on payment terms. The allowance for doubtful accounts represents management’s estimate and is based on historic losses, recent collection history of individual customers, foreclosure recovery experience for each storage center and economic conditions. We write-off delinquent accounts to the extent and at the time we deem them to be not recoverable.

Financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity:    We adopted the requirements of SFAS No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity,” in the third quarter of 2003, and there was no impact on our financial position, operating results or cash flows. However, the minority interests associated with certain of our consolidated joint ventures and our European subsidiaries that have finite lives under the terms of the partnership agreements represent mandatorily redeemable interests as defined in SFAS No. 150. As of December 31, 2005 and 2004, the aggregate book value of these minority interests in finite-lived entities on our consolidated balance sheet was $105.3 million and $158.4 million, respectively and we believe that the estimated aggregate settlement value of these interests was approximately $213.2 million and $210.0 million, respectively. This amount is based on the estimated liquidation values of the assets and liabilities and the resulting proceeds that we would distribute to our joint venture partners assuming dissolution as of December 31, 2005. As required under the terms of the respective partnership agreements, subsequent changes to the estimated fair value of the assets and liabilities of the consolidated joint

 

F-15


Table of Contents

SHURGARD STORAGE CENTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

ventures will affect our estimate of the aggregate settlement value. The partnership agreements do not limit the amount to which the minority partners would be entitled in the event of liquidation of the assets and liabilities and dissolution of the respective partnerships.

Stock-based compensation expense.    At December 31, 2005, we had stock based employee compensation plans, which are described more fully in Note 16 to the financial statements. We account for stock based compensation under APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.” We adopted the disclosure provisions of SFAS No, 148, “Accounting for Stock Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure,” which amends SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock Based Compensation.”

The following table reflects pro forma net income as if we had recognized stock-based compensation expense using the fair value method in accordance with SFAS No. 123.

 

     2005     2004     2003  
     (in thousands except per share data)  

Net income:

      

As reported

   $ 11,659     $ 45,295     $ 37,638  

Add: Stock based compensation expense

     2,751       3,433       1,150  

Less: Pro forma stock based compensation expense

     (4,315 )     (4,502 )     (2,132 )
                        

Pro forma net income

   $ 10,095     $ 44,226     $ 36,656  
                        

Basic net (loss) income available to common shareholders per share:

      

As reported

   $ (0.01 )   $ 0.72     $ 0.63  

Pro forma

     (0.04 )     0.70       0.61  

Diluted net (loss) income available to common shareholders per share:

      

As reported

   $ (0.01 )   $ 0.71     $ 0.62  

Pro forma

     (0.04 )     0.69       0.60  

Recent accounting pronouncements:    In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment,” a revision of SFAS No. 123. This statement disallows APB Opinion No. 25’s intrinsic value method of accounting for share based compensation awards and generally requires entities to recognize the cost of employee services received in exchange for awards of equity instruments based on the fair value of those awards as of their grant date. We will adopt the provisions of SFAS 123R as of January 1, 2006 using the modified prospective method. Under the modified prospective method, compensation cost is recognized beginning with the effective date for all share-based payments granted after the effective date and for the unamortized portion of all awards granted to employees prior to the effective date of SFAS No. 123R. Under SFAS No. 123R, we will recognize stock-based compensation expenses related to our stock option plans and our Employee Stock Purchase Plan that were previously only subject to disclosure. We are still evaluating the impact of adopting SFAS No. 123R on our financial position and operating results in 2006. We believe that the disclosure of pro-forma results required under SFAS No. 123 approximates our results if we had adopted the provisions of SFAS 123R as of January 1, 2003.

In October 2005, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) FAS 13-1 “Accounting for Rental Costs Incurred during a Construction Period,” which is effective for lease agreements entered into after January 1, 2006. This FSP clarifies that rental costs incurred during the period of construction of an asset on leased property should not be capitalized; rather they should be recognized as rental expense in the same manner as rental costs incurred after the construction period. However, to the extent a lessee accounts for rental of real estate projects under SFAS No. 67, “Accounting for Costs and Initial Rental Operations of Real Estate Projects,” it should continue capitalizing rental costs. We lease under operating leases certain parcels of land and buildings on which

 

F-16


Table of Contents

SHURGARD STORAGE CENTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

we develop storage centers or perform certain construction improvements. We have historically capitalized rental costs during the construction period on such properties. We account for real estate projects involving our development and construction of self-storage facilities under SFAS No. 67; therefore, we do not believe that the adoption of this FSP will have a material impact on our financial position, operating results or cash flows.

In June 2005, the FASB issued EITF Issue No. 04-5, “Determining Whether a General Partner, or the General Partners as a Group, Controls a Limited Partnership or Similar Entity When the Limited Partners Have Certain Rights.” In light of guidance provided in FIN 46R regarding “kick-out” rights in the context of evaluating variable interests and consolidation of variable interest entities, EITF 04-5 clarifies when a sole general partner should consolidate a limited partnership. EITF 04-5 provides authoritative guidance for purposes of assessing whether a limited partner’s rights are important rights that, under SOP 78-9, might preclude a general partner from consolidating a limited partnership. For general partners of all new limited partnerships formed and for existing limited partnerships for which the partnership agreements are modified, EITF 04-5 is effective after June 29, 2005. For general partners in all other limited partnerships, the guidance in this Issue was effective no later than the beginning of the first reporting period in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. We do not believe that the adoption of EITF 04-5 will have a material impact on our financial position, operating results or cash flows.

In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections—a replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3.” This statement replaces APB Opinion No. 20, “Accounting Changes,” and SFAS No. 3, “Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements,” and changes the requirements for the accounting for and reporting of a voluntary change in accounting principle. It also applies to changes required by an accounting pronouncement in the instance that the pronouncement does not include specific transition provisions. APB Opinion No. 20 previously required that most voluntary changes in accounting principle be recognized by including in net income of the period the cumulative effect of changing to the new accounting principle. SFAS No. 154 requires retrospective application of changes in accounting principle to prior periods’ financial statements, unless it is impracticable to determine either the period-specific effects or the cumulative effect of the change. We will adopt the provisions of SFAS No. 154 as of January 1, 2006 and we do not believe this statement will have a material impact on our financial position, operating results or cash flows.

In March 2005, the FASB issued FASB FIN 47, “Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations.” FIN 47 clarifies that the term “conditional asset retirement obligations” as used in SFAS No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations,” refers to a legal obligation to perform an asset retirement activity in which the timing and/or method of settlements are conditional on a future event that may or may not be within the control of the entity. FIN 47 indicates that an entity must record a liability for a conditional asset retirement obligation if the fair value of the obligation can be reasonably estimated and also clarifies when an entity should have sufficient information to reasonably estimate the fair value of an asset retirement obligation. This interpretation was effective October 1, 2005. The adoption of FIN 47 had no material impact on our financial position, operating results or cash flows.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, “Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets,” an amendment of APB Opinion No. 29, “Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions.” This statement eliminates the exception to the measurement at fair value for exchanges of similar productive assets and replaces it with an exception for exchange transactions that lack economic substance. The provisions of this statement were effective for transactions occurring after June 15, 2005 and have been applied prospectively. Accordingly, any exchange of properties or interests in properties needs to be evaluated for economic substance. The adoption of SFAS No. 153 had no material impact on our financial position, operating results or cash flows.

 

F-17


Table of Contents

SHURGARD STORAGE CENTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Note 3—Variable Interest Entities and Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting Principle

Under FIN 46R, a VIE must be consolidated by a company if that company is subject to a majority of the expected losses from the VIE’s activities or entitled to receive a majority of the entity’s residual returns or both. FIN 46R also requires disclosures about VIEs that a company is not required to consolidate, but in which it has a significant variable interest. We adopted FIN 46R as of January 1, 2004.

Prior to June 30, 2005, we had direct and indirect ownership interests in Shurgard Self Storage SCA (Shurgard Europe) of 87.23%. We assessed Shurgard Europe under the provisions of FIN 46R and concluded that it met the definition of a VIE. We also concluded that we were the primary beneficiary effective as of June 2003. As a result, we began consolidating Shurgard Europe in our financial statements beginning January 1, 2004. On June 30, 2005, we acquired the remaining 12.77% ownership interests in Shurgard Europe at a purchase price of approximately $97.4 million in cash. Accordingly, as of June 30, 2005, Shurgard Europe became a wholly-owned subsidiary and is no longer a VIE.

Shurgard Europe has created two joint venture entities: First Shurgard SPRL (First Shurgard) formed in January 2003 and Second Shurgard SPRL (Second Shurgard) formed in May 2004. Those joint ventures are expected to develop or acquire up to approximately 75 storage facilities in Europe. Shurgard Europe has a 20% interest in each of these ventures. We have also determined that First Shurgard and Second Shurgard are each VIEs, of which Shurgard Europe is the primary beneficiary. Accordingly, First Shurgard has been consolidated in our financial statements since January 1, 2004, and Second Shurgard has been consolidated since inception. At December 31, 2005, First Shurgard and Second Shurgard had aggregate total assets of $330.7 million, total liabilities of $212.5 million, and credit facilities collateralized by assets with net book value of $310.9 million (see Note 9). As of December 31, 2005, First Shurgard’s and Second Shurgard’s creditors had no recourse to the general credit of Shurgard or Shurgard Europe other than certain loan commitments. Under those commitments, Shurgard could subscribe to up to $20 million and an additional €5.0 million ($5.9 million as of December 31, 2005) in preferred bonds in a potential event of default of First Shurgard in addition to a €2.5 million ($3.0 million as of December 31, 2005) working capital facility. We have an option to put 80% of the bonds issued by First Shurgard to Crescent Euro Self Storage Investments, Shurgard Europe’s partner in the joint venture.

In October 2004, Self-Storage Securitisation B.V. (Securitisation BV), a Dutch limited liability entity in which Shurgard and its subsidiaries have no ownership interest, was formed to issue €325 million in floating rate investment grade bonds. This entity receives interest under a note of a similar amount with Shurgard Europe and holds certain derivatives instruments to hedge its interest rate exposure on the bonds. We determined that Securitisation BV is a VIE of which Shurgard Europe is the primary beneficiary based on the activity of this entity and the fact that the notes issued by Securitisation BV are collateralized by assets of Shurgard Europe. We have consolidated this entity since its inception.

Upon adoption of FIN 46R in 2004, we recognized a cumulative effect of change in accounting principle of approximately $2.3 million relating to the consolidation of First Shurgard. This is the result of eliminating all intercompany profits from inception of First Shurgard in 2003 as required under FIN 46R. Prior to adoption of FIN 46R, we eliminated our 20% ownership share of intercompany profits.

We do not believe that any of our other investees in which we do not hold a majority voting interest are VIEs under the provisions of FIN 46R.

 

F-18


Table of Contents

SHURGARD STORAGE CENTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Note 4—Storage Centers

The following table summarizes our operating storage centers at December 31, 2005 and 2004:

 

     As of December 31,
     2005    2004
     (in thousands)

Land

   $ 675,379    $ 662,458

Building

     2,487,831      2,405,370

Equipment & Other

     81,048      75,660
             
   $ 3,244,258    $ 3,143,488
             

During 2005, we purchased the remaining third party interest in Shurgard Europe, opened sixteen new storage centers, acquired ten storage centers and completed five major redevelopment projects on existing storage centers. We also sold five storage centers, including two that were classified as properties held for sale as of December 31, 2004. As of December 31, 2005, we had two properties and seven parcels of land held for sale with a net carrying value of $6.8 million (see Note 25). Construction in progress at December 31, 2005, consisted primarily of nine storage centers under construction and redevelopment projects for two existing storage centers, compared to five storage centers under construction and six redevelopments as of December 31, 2004.

Acquisitions

We completed the following acquisitions in 2005:

 

   

We recorded $47.0 million additions to storage centers related to our acquisition of the remaining third party interest in Shurgard Europe (See Note 5).

 

   

We acquired one storage center, for a purchase price of $3.0 million, in North Carolina through Shurgard/Morningstar Storage Centers, LLC, one of our consolidated subsidiaries of which we own 74%. Also, we completed the purchase of six storage centers in North Carolina for an aggregate purchase price of $26.0 million. These storage centers are managed by affiliates of certain members of Shurgard/Morningstar Storage Centers, LLC that are unrelated to Shurgard.

 

   

During 2005, we acquired Central Parkway Storage, Inc. (CPI), which owns two storage properties in Florida. We had a preexisting relationship with the shareholders of CPI and as part of the transaction we settled approximately $1.2 million of liabilities due to them. We also settled an option we had to acquire an interest in a property owned by them and recorded a gain on that option of approximately $560,000. The net consideration we issued in these transactions was approximately $10.4 million and consisted of 127,684 shares of common stock ($5.5 million) and cash ($4.9 million). We allocated $9.8 million of the consideration to storage centers and related assets. We also agreed to provide the sellers of CPI, at their request, a line of credit collateralized by the stock issued in the acquisition for up to 50% of the value of such stock for a term not to exceed 13 months with monthly interest payable at prime. No advances have been made under this facility.

 

   

We have an agreement with a California developer under which it purchases sites in southern California and constructs storage centers on them according to our specifications. On completion of the rent-up period, we have the option to purchase the storage centers. In 2005, we contributed three storage centers to one of the joint ventures. The development manager of these storage centers contributed an additional storage center in California (subject to a mortgage due to us) to the venture. We cancelled the mortgage on that storage center and received an approximate 85% interest in the

 

F-19


Table of Contents

SHURGARD STORAGE CENTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

 

venture; our partner received an approximate 15% interest in the venture. We agreed to lend up to $10.0 million to this developer to fund the construction of two properties, secured by the properties developed. As of December 31, 2005, the developer had drawn $9.4 million, which is included in other assets.

In 2005, we recognized assets for acquired non-compete agreements of $3.4 million on the above described acquisitions.

In 2004, we acquired eight storage centers through various acquisition transactions for an aggregate cost of $59.4 million, of which $35.8 million was settled in cash.

Minnesota Mini-Storage

On June 30, 2003, we acquired five entities owning a total of 19 self-storage centers located in Minnesota and operated under the name of Minnesota Mini-Storage in order to establish market presence in that state. We have included the results of Minnesota Mini-Storage in our consolidated financial statements since that date. We accounted for this acquisition as a purchase transaction.

Assuming we had acquired Minnesota Mini-Storage at the beginning 2003, pro forma income for continuing operations and net income would have exceeded reported amounts for 2003 by approximately $3.1 million or $0.05 per share for basic and diluted.

Other storage center activity

In 2005, we completed the sale of five storage centers: one in Arizona, one in California and three in Washington, for aggregate total proceeds of approximately $24.8 million and aggregate gains of $11.8 million.

We determined that the net book value of certain properties exceeded their fair value less costs to sell. Accordingly, we recorded an impairment loss for these properties of $420,000, $80,000 and $9.9 million in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

Additionally, the closure of warehouses of our containerized storage operations (see Note 11) caused us to evaluate the assets associated with these warehouses. As a result, we recognized equipment impairment losses related to these warehouses of $650,000 in 2003. We also recorded losses from write-offs of development costs on several projects of $2.9 million, $2.8 million and $1.2 million in 2005, 2004 and 2003.

Note 5—Investment in Shurgard Europe

We operate in seven European countries through our subsidiary Shurgard Europe. Through April 2003 our ownership interest in Shurgard Europe was 7.57%. During the period from April 2003 through December 31, 2003 we increased our ownership interest to 85.47% through several acquisition transactions and further increased our ownership interest in 2004 to 87.23%. On June 30, 2005, we acquired the remaining interest in Shurgard Europe for a purchase price of $97.4 million in cash, net of the minority interest partner’s share of intercompany debt between Shurgard Europe and Shurgard (approximately $8.1 million). The purchase price and direct acquisition costs exceeded the carrying value of the related minority interest by approximately $50.2 million of which we allocated $47.0 million to the storage centers owned by Shurgard Europe and its subsidiaries based on the properties’ fair values. We allocated the remaining $3.2 million to goodwill associated with Shurgard Europe’s underlying reporting units. We acquired this interest in order to gain full control of Shurgard Europe so that we can direct its future activities. We also expect to consolidate certain functions and, over the longer term, eliminate certain redundant costs.

 

F-20


Table of Contents

SHURGARD STORAGE CENTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Shurgard Europe conducts its development growth through two 20% owned consolidated joint ventures First Shurgard and Second Shurgard (see Note 3). These joint ventures had total equity commitments of €100 million ($118.4 million as of December 31, 2005) each, of which €2.4 million and €55.2 million ($2.8 million and $65.4 million as of December 31, 2005) remained to be drawn for First Shurgard and Second Shurgard, respectively, at December 31, 2005.

As of December 31, 2005, Shurgard Europe and its subsidiaries owned, managed or leased 149 properties containing approximately 7.9 million rentable square feet in seven European countries.

As discussed in Note 3, upon the adoption of FIN 46R, we started consolidating Shurgard Europe and First Shurgard as of January 1, 2004, and we started consolidating Second Shurgard at its inception in May 2004. We previously accounted for our investments in Shurgard Europe and First Shurgard using the equity method of accounting.

Shurgard Europe financial information

Following are summarized statements of operations for Shurgard Europe and its subsidiaries. We have eliminated in consolidation with Shurgard, interest income related to the preferred bonds of Shurgard Europe (see Note 23) of $8.7 million, $8.0 million and $6.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003.

Shurgard Self Storage S.C.A. (3)

Consolidated Statements of Operations

 

     2005     2004 (1)     2003 (1)  
     (in thousands)  

Revenue

      

Storage center operations

   $ 124,928     $ 101,532     $ 70,118  

Other revenue

     101       219       11,376  
                        

Total revenue

     125,029       101,751       81,494  
                        

Expenses

      

Operating

     83,793       74,250       50,373  

Real estate development

     7,396       4,592       8,928  

Depreciation and amortization

     24,831       21,090       19,433  

Impairment and abandoned project losses

     2,294       2,226       1,422  

General, administrative and other

     8,151       6,509       6,181  
                        

Total expenses

     126,465       108,667       86,337  
                        

Loss from operations

     (1,436 )     (6,916 )     (4,843 )
                        

Other Income (Expense)

      

Interest expense

     (44,475 )     (36,091 )     (36,171 )

Loss on derivatives

     (4,073 )     (1,244 )     —    

Foreign exchange (loss) gain

     (8,034 )     4,930       9,830  

Interest income and other

     224       605       1,520  
                        

Other expense, net

     (56,358 )     (31,800 )     (24,821 )
                        

Loss before minority interest and income taxes

     (57,794 )     (38,716 )     (29,664 )

Minority interest (2)

     19,832       13,334       —    

Income tax expense

     (253 )     (46 )     (202 )
                        

Net loss before cumulative effect of accounting change

     (38,215 )     (25,428 )     (29,866 )

Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle

     —         (2,339 )     —    
                        

Net loss

   $ (38,215 )   $ (27,767 )   $ (29,866 )
                        

 

F-21


Table of Contents

SHURGARD STORAGE CENTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 


(1) Certain prior years’ amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation with no effect on net loss.
(2) The minority interest represents approximately 80% of the losses attributable to Shurgard Europe’s joint ventures.
(3) The financial information is presented as used for consolidation purposes with Shurgard and is not representative of Shurgard Europe’s financial information in U.S. GAAP on a stand-alone basis.

Note 6—Goodwill

In 2005, we recognized $3.2 million of goodwill associated with Shurgard Europe’s underlying reporting units upon acquisition of our minority partner’s share of Shurgard Europe (see Note 5).

In 2003, we determined that the remaining goodwill on Storage To Go, LLC (STG), a company that held our containerized storage operations, was fully impaired due to the closure of this activity. As a result, we recorded an impairment loss of $490,000 in 2003.

Note 7—Other Assets and Accounts Payable and Other Liabilities

The following table summarizes other assets by category:

 

     As of December 31,
     2005    2004
     (in thousands)

Financing costs, net of accumulated amortization of $22,852 in 2005 and $19,121 in 2004

   $ 34,121    $ 39,976

Trade receivable, net of allowance of $4,681 in 2005 and $3,393 in 2004

     14,964      13,206

Prepaid expenses

     14,751      15,300

Software costs, net of accumulated amortization of $3,056 in 2005 and $2,134 in 2004

     14,638      10,551

Notes receivable

     13,868      16,956

Non-competition, trademark and management agreements, net of accumulated amortization of $9,827 in 2005 and $8,464 in 2004

     4,186      912

Other accounts receivable

     10,958      12,560

Other real estate investments (1)

     26      738

Derivatives—assets (see Note 14)

     4,709      11,234

Other assets, net of accumulated amortization of $1,575 in 2005 and $2,039 in 2004

     7,027      6,771
             

Total other assets

   $ 119,248    $ 128,204
             

(1) We had an investment in one domestic unconsolidated entity accounted for using the equity method as of December 31, 2004. We sold our investment in that subsidiary in July 2005.

 

F-22


Table of Contents

SHURGARD STORAGE CENTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

The major components of our amortizable intangible balances are software costs and non-compete agreements, trademark and management agreements. Amortizable intangibles are included in other assets as presented above. We recognized amortization expenses on these intangibles of $2.9 million, $1.4 million and $1.3 million in 2005, 2004 and 2003. The following table summarizes our estimated amortization expense for intangible assets over the next five years (in thousands):

 

2006

   $ 4,024

2007

     4,161

2008

     2,916

2009

     2,389

2010

     1,836
      
   $ 15,326
      

The following table presents the components of accounts payable and other liabilities:

 

     As of December 31,
     2005    2004
     (in thousands)

Accounts payable

   $ 17,937    $ 22,029

Accrued real estate taxes

     12,652      11,620

Accrued personnel cost

     15,711      13,124

Accrued interest

     15,330      14,164

Prepaid revenue and deposits

     28,641      27,489

Taxes payable

     15,765      18,086

Accrued expense related to exploration of strategic alternatives

     11,350      —  

Derivatives—liabilities (see Note 14)

     23,997      41,675

Other accrued expenses and liabilities

     40,052      32,465
             

Total accounts payable and other liabilities

   $ 181,435    $ 180,652
             

Note 8—Lines of Credit

The following table summarizes our lines of credit:

 

     December 31,
2005
   December 31,
2004
   Weighted
Average
interest rate at
December 31,
2005
    Weighted
Average
interest rate at
December 31,
2004
 
     (in thousands)             

Unsecured domestic line of credit

   $ 233,500    $ 297,300    5.46 %   3.52 %

Unsecured domestic term loan credit facility

     350,000      100,000    5.76 %   3.53 %
                          
   $ 583,500    $ 397,300    5.64 %   3.52 %
                          

In 2005, we entered into a three-year unsecured domestic credit agreement, which includes a revolving credit facility with a group of banks to borrow up to $350 million and a $350 million term loan facility that matures in February 2008. We borrowed the entire available $350 million on the term loan facility and used the proceeds to fund the acquisition of the remaining interest in Shurgard Europe (See Note 5), to finance other acquisitions (See Note 4) and the development of certain of our properties, and to repay borrowings under the revolving credit facility. The revolving credit facility can be extended for one year at our option for a fee. The

 

F-23


Table of Contents

SHURGARD STORAGE CENTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

revolving credit facility and the term loan require monthly interest payments at LIBOR plus 0.90% and LIBOR plus 1.10%, respectively, at December 31, 2005. Downgrades made by bond rating agencies in July 2005 to our senior unsecured debt rating resulted in an increase of 0.2% (included in above rates) in our interest rate on the domestic line of credit and term loan agreements. As of December 31, 2005, availability under the revolving credit facility was $116.5 million. The domestic credit agreement requires us to maintain quarterly maximum total debt and secured debt to gross asset value ratios and minimum adjusted EBITDA to fixed charges and unencumbered net operating income to unsecured interest expense ratios. The financial covenants also require us to maintain a minimum tangible net worth. A breach of these covenants and other various covenants may result in an acceleration of the maturity of amounts outstanding. The domestic credit agreement restricts our distributions to a maximum of 105% of Adjusted Funds from Operations (Adjusted FFO) for up to four consecutive quarters; after that it must not exceed 95% of Adjusted FFO. Adjusted FFO is defined in the domestic credit agreement as (i) net income (calculated in accordance with GAAP) excluding non-recurring gains and losses on or from operating properties; plus (ii) depreciation and amortization; and after adjustments for unconsolidated subsidiaries. Adjusted FFO excludes the effects of charges and costs associated with the takeover proposal and exploration of strategic alternatives. Contributions to Adjusted FFO from unconsolidated subsidiaries are reflected in Adjusted FFO in proportion to borrower’s share of such unconsolidated subsidiaries. The quarterly distributions did not reach 95% of the Adjusted FFO in 2005. As of December 31, 2005, we were in compliance with these financial covenants.

As of December 31, 2004, we had an unsecured domestic line of credit to borrow up to $360 million, an unsecured term loan agreement for an additional $100 million and an unused line of credit for the Storage Center Trust available for the financing of the properties under our tax retention operating leases. These facilities required monthly interest payments at LIBOR plus 1.25%. Both facilities matured on February 26, 2005 and we refinanced them with borrowings on our new credit facilities discussed above.

 

F-24


Table of Contents

SHURGARD STORAGE CENTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Note 9—Notes Payable

Notes payable consisted of the following:

 

     As of December 31,  
     2005     2004  
     (in thousands)  

Domestic Notes payable (1)

    

5.875% senior unsecured notes due in 2013

   $ 200,000     $ 200,000  

7.75% senior unsecured notes due in 2011

     200,000       200,000  

7.625% senior unsecured notes due in 2007

     50,000       50,000  

Fixed rate mortgage notes payable

     167,331       169,510  

Maturity dates range from 2006 to 2015

    

Interest rates range from 4.95% to 8.9%

    

Variable rate mortgage notes payable

     81,410       75,231  

Maturity dates range from 2006 to 2010

    

Interest rates range from 6.29% to 7.25%

    

European Notes payable (1)

    

Collateralized €325 million notes payable due in 2011

     384,889       443,299  

Interest rate of 2.68% (EURIBOR + 0.51%)

    

First Shurgard and Second Shurgard

     185,931       137,764  

Senior credit agreements

    

Maturity dates range from 2008 to 2009

    

Interest rate of 4.58% (EURIBOR + 2.25%)

    

Capital leases

     6,010       11,112  

Maturity dates range from 2011 to 2052

    

Interest rates range from 6% to 14%

    
                
     1,275,571       1,286,916  

Discount on domestic senior notes payable

     (610 )     (695 )

Premium on domestic mortgage notes payable

     759       981  
                

Total Notes Payable

     1,275,720       1,287,202  
                

(1) All maturities and interest rates are as of December 31, 2005.

First Shurgard and Second Shurgard have senior credit agreements denominated in euros to borrow, in aggregate, up to €272.5 million ($322.7 million as of December 31, 2005). As of December 31, 2005, the available amount under those credit facilities was, in aggregate, €115.5 million ($136.8 million). Our draws under the First Shurgard and Second Shurgard credit facilities are determined on a development project basis and can be limited if the completion of projects is not timely and if we have certain cost overruns. The credit facilities also require us to maintain a maximum loan to value of the collateral ratio and a minimum debt service ratio. In December 2004, we notified the agent for the lenders of First Shurgard’s credit facility that First Shurgard would require modifications to certain of its covenants in order to be in compliance. The lenders agreed to modifications of these covenants in February 2005. No default or acceleration of the credit facility was declared by the lenders. As of December 31, 2005, we were in compliance with the revised covenants. Borrowings under both the First Shurgard and Second Shurgard credit facilities were such that they could only be used to fund property development costs of First Shurgard and Second Shurgard. In January 2006, we amended Second Shurgard’s credit agreement such as to allow for borrowings for up to €21.9 million ($25.9 million as of December 31, 2005) to be used for acquisition of existing self-storage properties including properties under capital leases.

 

F-25


Table of Contents

SHURGARD STORAGE CENTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

In December 2005, we renewed a domestic variable rate mortgage note payable at maturity. The note is collateralized by 21 self-storage properties and bears interest of LIBOR plus 1.5%. This amendment increased the principal amount of the borrowing by $0.7 million to $67.0 million and extended the term to December 2008.

In February 2005, we entered into one new domestic mortgage agreement to partially finance the purchase of a storage center in North Carolina (see Note 4). This $2.2 million note matures in February 2010 and bears monthly interest of LIBOR plus 2%. At December 31, 2005, we had three loan agreements to develop three new properties. We had drawn $3.5 million under these loans and $5.0 million remained available for draw. Also, in July 2005, we refinanced two of our fixed interest rate mortgages into one new $3.1 million fixed interest rate mortgage bearing a 4.95% interest rate and maturing in August 2015.

As of December 31, 2005 and 2004, our notes payable were collateralized by storage centers with net book values of $1.42 billion and $1.18 billion, respectively.

At December 31, 2005, scheduled amortization and maturities of all notes payable, excluding capital leases, for the next five years and thereafter were as follows (in thousands):

 

Year

   Total

2006

   $ 9,226

2007

     64,310

2008

     230,542

2009

     37,976

2010

     10,631

Thereafter

     916,876
      
   $ 1,269,561
      

Participation Rights

In 2000 and prior, we formed joint ventures in which our partners’ rights, including rights to redeem their interests at amounts determined in the related agreements, were substantively participating mortgages. We accounted for these joint ventures as financing arrangements, and, as such, recognized all activities related to those properties in our financial statements. On the formation of the ventures, we recognized participation rights liabilities and related discounts on the underlying liabilities for the estimated fair values of the partners’ shares of the joint ventures based on the best evidence available to us. The discounts were amortized as a component of interest expense based on estimated dates of redemptions. We retired our remaining participation rights in December 2004, when we acquired our joint venture partner’s interest. In 2004 and 2003, we recognized $1.1 million and $5.5 million, respectively, in amortization income. The adjustments to amortization were based on re-evaluations of our estimated participation rights liability each period based on the performance of the related properties and estimates of the rights’ retirement dates. Also, in 2003 we recognized a $7.5 million impairment loss in relation with four properties associated with these participation rights.

 

F-26


Table of Contents

SHURGARD STORAGE CENTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Note 10—Lease Obligations

We lease certain parcels of land, buildings and equipment. We also have five properties in Belgium and the Netherlands under capital leases with purchase options on the Belgian properties exercisable in 2011 and 2022. The future minimum rental payments required under these leases are as follows (in thousands):

 

     Operating
leases (1)
   Capital
leases
   Total

2006

   $ 9,509    $ 618    $ 10,127

2007

     8,512      630      9,142

2008

     7,265      642      7,907

2009

     6,584      654      7,238

2010

     5,200      604      5,804

Thereafter

     143,852      33,784      177,636
                    
   $ 180,922    $ 36,932    $ 217,854
                    

(1) Certain of our European land operating leases have indefinite terms or extension options exercisable at discretion of the lessee. For such land leases we have disclosed operating lease obligations over the estimated useful life of the related property.

The present value of net minimum capital lease payments at December 31, 2005, was as follows (in thousands):

 

Present value of net minimum capital lease payments

      

Capital lease total future payments

   $ 36,932  

Amount representing interest

     (30,922 )
        

Present value of net minimum capital lease payments

   $ 6,010  
        

Expenses under operating leases were approximately $8.4 million, $6.3 million and $5.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Certain of our land leases include escalation clauses, and we recognize related lease expenses on a straight-line basis. Several of our lease agreements have rent amounts contingent on our storage centers’ revenue. Our lease expense due to contingent rent was $280,000, $150,000 and $180,000, in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

The net book value of properties under capital leases was $6.1 million and $9.8 million as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, net of accumulated depreciation of $1.2 million and $2.9 million, respectively. We recognize depreciation expense on these properties in depreciation and amortization on the consolidated statements of operations.

Note 11—Restructuring and Exit Costs

Upon acquiring the remaining minority interest, we announced a plan to change the management structure of Shurgard Europe, including the consolidation of certain national offices, and recorded charges associated with these activities, including certain termination benefits payable to certain involuntarily terminated employees and lease termination costs relating to certain leased office facilities that we ceased using in 2005. Under this plan, we also announced that we would undertake further cost reduction initiatives through the end of 2007. In 2005, we started implementing cost reductions by consolidating certain departments and we reduced the number of

 

F-27


Table of Contents

SHURGARD STORAGE CENTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

positions in operations management, real estate and finance groups in various countries. We recorded the charges related to these cost reduction initiatives as the various initiatives take effect. We also recognized a liability for lease termination costs based on the remaining rental payments under the lease less estimated market sublease payments we might receive should we sublease the space. The operating leases for facilities we have ceased to use expire in 2009. Under this plan, we recognized expenses of $2.4 million in 2005, including $2.0 million in severance payments and $0.4 million for lease obligations that are included in general administrative and other on our consolidated statement of operations. As of December 31, 2005, we had an outstanding liability of $630,000. We expect to incur additional expenses in 2006 and 2007 as further reorganization decisions are made.

In December 2001 and 2003, our board of directors approved exit plans to discontinue our containerized storage operations. In connection with these decisions, we accrued incremental costs expected to be incurred during the closing of the warehouses affected by our exit plan. As of December 31, 2005, we had a remaining liability under warehouse operating lease obligations through 2008. The liability is recognized at its fair value for the remaining lease rentals, reduced by estimated sublease rentals and is reevaluated periodically. As of December 31, 2005, we had entered into subleasing agreements for all seven warehouses, including some on a month-to-month basis.

Since 2001, we have incurred $5.3 million of exit costs related to containerized storage operations. The following table summarizes costs incurred for exiting our containerized storage operations since January 2003:

 

     (in thousands)  

Total accrued exit costs as of January 1, 2003

   $ 1,019  

Payments made

     (507 )
        

Total accrued exit costs as of December 31, 2003

     512  

Exit costs

     2,276  

Payments made

     (1,304 )
        

Total accrued exit costs as of December 31, 2004

     1,484  

Exit costs

     271  

Payments made

     (982 )
        

Total accrued exit costs as of December 31, 2005

   $ 773  
        

Note 12—Income Taxes

We elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code commencing with our taxable year ended December 31, 1994. As a REIT, we generally will not be subject to corporate level federal income tax on taxable income we distribute to our shareholders. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we will be subject to federal income taxes at regular corporate rates (including any applicable alternative minimum tax) and may not qualify as a REIT for four subsequent years. Even if we qualify for taxation as a REIT, we are subject to certain state and local taxes on income and property, and to federal income and excise taxes on undistributed taxable income. In addition, taxable income from non-REIT activities managed through our taxable REIT subsidiaries is subject to federal, state and local income taxes and our European subsidiaries are subject to certain income taxes in the respective jurisdictions of the countries in which they operate. As of December 31, 2005, we believe we were in compliance with REIT requirements.

 

F-28


Table of Contents

SHURGARD STORAGE CENTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

The following reconciles our net income to the adjusted REIT taxable income:

 

     2005
(estimate)
    2004
(actual)
    2003
(actual)
 
     (in thousands)  

Net income

   $ 11,659     $ 45,295     $ 37,638  

Adjustments to earnings of European subsidiaries

     53,680       39,775       20,329  

Costs related to takeover proposal and exploration of strategic alternatives

     13,775       —         —    

Stock grant compensation

     (5,168 )     (4,782 )     (2,353 )

Settlement reserves

     (2,693 )     2,790       144  

Investment in U.S. partnerships and joint ventures

     2,280       365       9,055  

Travel and entertainment

     302       273       222  

Unrealized (gain) loss on financial instruments

     (1,951 )     (630 )     2,194  

Adjustments to earnings of taxable REIT subsidiaries

     (749 )     218       3,035  

Depreciation and amortization

     10,702       9,860       597  

Gain on disposition of assets

     284       193       2,540  

Workmen’s compensation

     (343 )     1,840       1,336  

Unrealized loss (gain) on foreign exchange

     2,473       (2,172 )     (230 )

Professional fees

     843       (2,749 )     4,781  

Prepaid rent

     (143 )     307       314  

Section 162(m) limitation

     183       1,171       —    

Accrued compensation

     846       915       453  

Other items

     71       68       (208 )
                        

Adjusted REIT taxable income subject to the 90% distribution requirement

   $ 86,051     $ 92,737     $ 79,847  
                        

For income tax purposes, distributions paid to common shareholders consist of ordinary income, capital gains, return of capital or a combination thereof. For the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, distributions paid per share were taxable as follows:

 

     2005     2004     2003  
     Amount    Percentage     Amount    Percentage     Amount    Percentage  

Ordinary income

   $ 1.47    65.9 %   $ 1.52    69.4 %   $ 1.67    77.7 %

Capital gains

     0.22    9.9 %     0.32    14.6 %     0.06    2.8 %

Return of capital

     0.54    24.2 %     0.35    16.0 %     0.42    19.5 %
                                       
   $ 2.23    100.0 %   $ 2.19    100.0 %   $ 2.15    100.0 %
                                       

Additionally, during 2005 we paid dividends on our Series C and Series D cumulative redeemable preferred stock of $1.63 and $1.64 per share, respectively. Of these amounts, 87.0% consisted of ordinary dividends and 13.0% consisted of capital gain dividends.

In 2005, we transferred ownership interests of certain properties from a taxable entity to the REIT and recorded approximately $410,000 of U.S. federal and state income tax expense related to this transaction. Also, certain European subsidiaries have started generating taxable income resulting in income tax expense in 2005. In 2003, we recognized a $1.6 million tax expense for Recom, a Belgian subsidiary that we started consolidating that year. As of December 31, 2005 and 2004, we had tax liabilities of $870,000 and $1.9 million, respectively.

Consolidated U.S. income from continuing operations before income tax expense was $27.8 million, $63.6 million and $40.7 million for 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The corresponding amounts from foreign based operations were losses of $27.7 million, $34.1 million and $3.8 million, respectively.

 

F-29


Table of Contents

SHURGARD STORAGE CENTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Our income tax expense consisted of the following components:

 

     2005    2004    2003
     (in thousands)

Federal

   $ 386    $ 27    $ —  

State

     73      —        —  

Foreign

     177      45      1,611
                    

Total income tax expense

   $ 636    $ 72    $ 1,611
                    

The components of deferred tax assets (liabilities) for Shurgard’s taxable operations are included in the table below. As of December 31, 2005 and 2004, we had established a valuation allowance for the value of our deferred tax assets. Given the history of losses of our taxable operations, we have concluded there is insufficient evidence at this point to justify recognition of the benefits of these deferred tax assets on our books. Our domestic TRS entities have started to generate taxable income, which resulted in a reduction of our domestic deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2005 compared to 2004. As of December 31, 2005, we had U.S. federal net operating loss carryforwards of $24.1 million that will expire starting in 2012. Additionally, as of December 31, 2005, we had U.S. state and local net operating loss carryforwards of $11.8 million that will start expiring in 2006. We had $307.4 million of net operating loss carryforwards from our European operations as of December 31, 2005. This amount may be carried forward indefinitely. On March 6, 2006, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (see Note 22) with Public Storage, Inc., that contemplates a merger whereby we will be merged with and into a subsidiary of Public Storage, Inc. Upon merger it is possible that part of the net operating loss carryforwards described above could be lost, in whole or in part, depending upon the type of transaction.

The foreign and domestic components of our net deferred tax asset were as follows:

 

     2005     2004  
     (in thousands)  

Domestic

   $ 9,627     $ 10,592  

Foreign

     95,062       77,019  
                

Net deferred tax asset before valuation allowance

     104,689       87,611  

Valuation allowance

     (104,689 )     (87,611 )
                

Net deferred tax asset

   $ —       $ —    
                

Significant components of our deferred tax assets and liabilities were as follows:

 

     2005     2004  
     (in thousands)  

Deferred tax assets:

    

Net operating loss carryforwards

   $ 106,580     $ 105,888  

Net unrealized loss on derivatives

     5,575       —    

Losses on asset recognition

     591       503  

Accrual of warehouses exit costs

     263       595  

Other

     791       1,164  

Deferred tax liabilities:

    

Depreciation

     (5,579 )     (9,028 )

Exchange translation on bonds payable

     (3,186 )     (6,888 )

Other

     (346 )     (4,623 )
                

Net deferred tax asset before valuation allowance

     104,689       87,611  

Valuation allowance

     (104,689 )     (87,611 )
                

Net deferred tax asset

   $ —       $ —    
                

 

F-30


Table of Contents

SHURGARD STORAGE CENTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

We increased our valuation allowance for deferred tax assets by $17.1 million, $78.2 million and $1.0 million in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

Note 13—Shareholders’ Equity

Shurgard has 40 million shares of preferred stock authorized, of which 2.8 million shares have been designated as Series A junior participating preferred stock (none of which were issued or outstanding at December 31, 2005), 2 million shares have been designated as Series C cumulative redeemable preferred stock (all of which were issued and outstanding at December 31, 2005) and 3.45 million shares have been designated as Series D cumulative redeemable preferred stock (all of which were issued and outstanding at December 31, 2005). The board of directors is authorized to determine the rights, preferences and privileges of the preferred stock including the number of shares constituting any such series and the designation thereof.

Our Series C and Series D cumulative redeemable preferred stock earn quarterly dividends at rates of 8.70% and 8.75% of their liquidation preferences, respectively. Our series C cumulative redeemable preferred stock became callable at our option in December 2003, at a redemption price of $25 per share. Our Series D cumulative redeemable preferred Stock became callable at our option in February 2006, at a redemption price of $25 per share. On December 1, 2005, our board of directors declared preferred dividends for our Series C and Series D cumulative redeemable preferred stock for the fourth quarter of 2005 at a rate of $0.54 and $0.55 per share, respectively. The aggregate amount of these preferred stock dividends was $3.0 million and was accrued in other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2005.

In 2005, we acquired CPI, which owns two storage properties in Florida (see Note 4). We issued 127,684 shares of Class A common stock ($5.5 million) in connection with this purchase. We allocated the amount of the consideration to storage centers and related assets acquired.

In October 2003, we issued 395,000 shares of our Class A common stock in connection with our purchase of our European operating partners’ interest in Recom and Shurgard Europe.

On July 11, 2003, we raised approximately $178.2 million through the sale to the public of 5.75 million shares of Class A common stock. We used approximately $101.6 million of the proceeds to fund the acquisition of an additional 19.7% ownership interest in Shurgard Europe. We used the additional proceeds to repay a portion of the indebtedness under our line of credit, which included amounts we borrowed to purchase the 36 properties that we previously operated under our tax retention operating leases and to fund our additional investment in Recom.

In June 2003, we issued 3,050,000 shares of Class A common stock in connection with our purchase of Minnesota Mini-Storage at closing and issued an additional 50,000 shares in September 2004 when the transaction was finalized.

 

F-31


Table of Contents

SHURGARD STORAGE CENTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Note 14—Derivative Financial Instruments

We use derivative instruments to manage risks associated with movements in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. We report derivative financial instruments at fair value on our consolidated balance sheets in other assets and other liabilities and had the following balances as of December 31:

 

     December 31,
2005
    December 31,
2004
 
     (in thousands)  

Assets

    

Debt-related contracts

   $ 2,792     $ 5,612  

Foreign currency exchange contracts

     1,917       5,622  
                
   $ 4,709     $ 11,234  
                

Liabilities

    

Debt-related contracts

   $ (21,778 )   $ (39,586 )

Foreign currency exchange contracts

     (2,219 )     (2,089 )
                
   $ (23,997 )   $ (41,675 )
                

As of December 31, 2005 and 2004, the balance in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) related to derivative transactions was a loss of $9.5 million and of $9.9 million, respectively.

In the United States we had entered into interest rate swaps that were not designated as hedges, which matured in February 2005 and were settled for $14.9 million.

In March 2002, we entered into a fixed to variable interest rate swap for $50 million of the senior notes payable due in 2004. We designated this hedge as a fair value hedge. We recognized the gain or loss on the swap and the bonds in earnings and adjusted the carrying value of the bonds accordingly. On August 20, 2002, we terminated these swaps at a gain of $2 million. We amortized this gain to interest expense as an adjustment to the carrying value of the bonds over the remaining life of the bonds using the effective interest method. For the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, interest expense was reduced by $380,000 and $1.2 million respectively, for amortization of the gain. We repaid the bonds in full in April 2004.

Shurgard Europe has entered into an interest rate swap to effectively fix EURIBOR at 3.714% through October 2011 on €325 million of variable rate debt. This swap is designated as a cash flow hedge and was a liability of $12.9 million and $12.7 million at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Shurgard Europe has also entered into foreign currency exchange derivatives designated as cash flow hedges. These instruments were liabilities of $1.7 million and assets of $940,000 at December 31, 2005 and assets of $2.1 million and liabilities of $1.5 million at December 31, 2004. We had undesignated interest rate caps for interest rate changes between October 2011 and October 2014 that we entered into as part of Shurgard Europe’s bond issuance. Shurgard Europe’s interest rate cap was an asset of $2.8 million at December 31, 2005, and expires in October 2014. To offset the earnings impact of this cap, we sold two interest rate caps with terms, that combined, reciprocate those of Shurgard Europe’s cap. These caps were liabilities of $3.0 million at December 31, 2005.

First Shurgard has entered into interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges of interest payments on future borrowings under its credit facility. In June 2005, we determined that one of these swaps ceased to be an effective hedge and no longer qualified for hedge accounting. Accordingly, we are reclassifying the related accumulated other comprehensive loss of €230,000 ($280,000 at December 31, 2005) to earnings through the swaps’ maturity in March 2006. We expect to reclassify approximately $95,000 to earnings for this instrument in 2006.

 

F-32


Table of Contents

SHURGARD STORAGE CENTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

(The weighted-average notional amounts and fixed pay rates of these swaps still designated as cash flow hedges are as follows (euros in millions):

 

     2006     2007     2008  

Notional amounts

   123.6     118.8     45.1  

Weighted-average pay rates

     3.7 %     3.8 %     3.8 %

The swap agreements were liabilities of $2.7 million and $4.1 million at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

First Shurgard has also entered into foreign currency exchange derivatives designated as cash flow hedges or economic hedges of net investments in subsidiaries outside the euro zone. These instruments, which mature in May 2008, were liabilities of $0.5 million at December 31, 2005 and assets of $0.8 million and liabilities of $0.5 million at December 31, 2004. We recognized a gain of $0.8 million and $0.3 million in currency translation adjustment on our consolidated balance sheet for those derivatives for the same periods.

In connection with financing agreements, First Shurgard also entered into call options maturing on May 27, 2008, for the purchase of €15 million equating to $18.6 million at a fixed exchange rate. This transaction does not qualify for hedge accounting. These instruments were assets of $970,000 and $2.7 million at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

Second Shurgard has entered into interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges of interest payments on future borrowings under its credit facility. The weighted-average notional amounts and fixed pay rates of these swaps are as follows (euros in millions):

 

     2006     2007     2008     2009  

Notional amounts

   91.4     123.3     125.2     69.3  

Weighted-average pay rates

     3.8 %     3.7 %     3.7 %     3.7 %

These swap agreements were liabilities of $3.1 million and $2.8 million at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

In 2005 and 2004, we recognized a loss of $0.4 million and $0.7 million, respectively, for hedge ineffectiveness in (interest expense/foreign exchange gain/loss) in our consolidated statements of operations.

Note 15—Foreign operations

We conduct our foreign operations through Shurgard Europe and other European subsidiaries, which we started consolidating as of January 1, 2004. Our European revenues amounted to $126.5 million, or 26%, and $102.1 million, or 24%, of total revenue for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

As a result of our international operations, we recorded a $9.7 million foreign exchange loss, a $6.2 million foreign exchange gain and a $430,000 foreign exchange loss for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

Through July 1, 2005, we were exposed to foreign currency exchange risk related to intercompany debt with or between our European subsidiaries that is not denominated in the functional currency of the subsidiary or the investee. In connection with the acquisition of the remaining interest in Shurgard Europe, we reevaluated our

 

F-33


Table of Contents

SHURGARD STORAGE CENTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

plans and expectations with respect to repayment of certain intercompany debt with our European subsidiaries and determined that it is prospectively a long-term-investment as defined in SFAS 52, “Foreign Currency Translation.” Accordingly, we do not recognize exchange gains or losses on such intercompany debt in our consolidated statements of operations. Rather, beginning July 1, 2005, we report these translation adjustments as a component of other comprehensive income (loss). We had a foreign exchange loss of $9.2 million in net income related to this intercompany debt during 2005 compared to a gain of $6.5 million during 2004. We recorded losses of $1.3 million related to this intercompany debt during 2005, as a component of other comprehensive income (loss).

Included in accumulated other comprehensive income was a cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment loss of $4.1 million as of December 31, 2005, and a gain of $12.7 million as of December 31, 2004.

Note 16—Stock Compensation and Benefit Plans

Summary of Stock Compensation Plans

Our stock compensation plans provide for the granting of options, as well as restricted stock awards, performance awards, stock unit awards and distribution equivalent rights. As of December 31, 2005, we had outstanding grants under several stock option and long-term incentive compensation plans. Our 1993 Stock Option Plan for Employees and Stock Option Plan for Non-employee Directors, as amended during 1995, expired in 2003. Our 1995 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan expired in 2000, and the remaining outstanding options under the plan will expire in or before 2010.

In 2005 and 2004, we made grants under both the 2000 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan (the 2000 Plan), and the 2004 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan (the 2004 Plan) that was approved by shareholders in June 2004. In 2003, we made grants under the 2000 Plan. The purpose of the 2004 Plan is to enhance the long-term profitability and shareholder value of the Company by offering incentives and rewards to those employees, officers, directors, consultants and agents of Shurgard and its subsidiaries who are key to our growth and success. The 2004 Plan is also intended to encourage such persons to remain in the service of Shurgard and its subsidiaries and to acquire and maintain stock ownership in Shurgard. Both the 2000 Plan and the 2004 Plan permit the plan administrator to authorize loans, loan guarantees or installment payments to assist award recipients in acquiring shares pursuant to awards, but contain certain limitations imposed by tax legislation. Both plans require mandatory acceleration of vesting in the event of certain mergers and consolidations or a sale of substantially all the assets or a liquidation of Shurgard, except where such awards are assumed or replaced in the transaction. The 2000 Plan and the 2004 Plan allow for grants to consultants and agents as well as our officers, directors and key employees.

The 2000 Plan provides for the granting of up to 2.8 million shares of our Class A common stock. Approximately 20,000 authorized shares remained available for future grants under this plan as of December 31, 2005. The 2004 Plan provides for the granting of up to 3.5 million shares of our Class A common stock. Approximately 3.1 million authorized shares were available for future grants under this plan as of December 31, 2005.

Stock Options

Each stock option provides the recipient the right to purchase shares of our Class A common stock at the fair market value of our common stock as of the date of grant. Stock options have a ten-year term from the grant date and vest over a three-year period under the 2000 Plan and a minimum of four years under the 2004 Plan with a vesting schedule determined by the plan administrator at the time of grant.

 

F-34


Table of Contents

SHURGARD STORAGE CENTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

The fair value of options granted under our stock option plans is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with weighted-average assumptions as follows:

Weighted average assumptions used for

Black-Scholes option-pricing model

 

     2005     2004     2003  

Dividend yield

     4.02 %     5.55 %     7.97 %

Expected volatility

     20 %     22 %     23 %

Risk free interest rate

     4.43 %     3.59 %     2.94 %

Expected life (in years)

     5.5       5.5       5.6  

Fair value per option (1)

   $ 8.83     $ 5.04     $ 3.12  

(1) Weighted averages of option grants during each period.

The following table summarizes changes in options outstanding under the plans:

 

     2005    2004    2003
     Number of
Shares
    Weighted
average
exercise
price
   Number of
Shares
    Weighted
average
exercise
price
   Number of
Shares
    Weighted
average
exercise
price

Outstanding, January 1,

   2,727,970     $ 31.64    2,887,294     $ 28.21    2,896,461     $ 26.17

Granted

   402,180     $ 56.07    605,203     $ 42.09    492,350     $ 36.43

Forfeited

   (90,533 )   $ 37.88    (88,262 )   $ 33.19    (72,283 )   $ 23.67

Exercised

   (222,030 )   $ 29.11    (676,265 )   $ 26.17    (429,234 )   $ 29.46
                          

Outstanding, December 31,

   2,817,587     $ 35.11    2,727,970     $ 31.64    2,887,294     $ 28.21
                          

Exercisable, December 31,

   1,896,545     $ 29.04    1,727,562     $ 27.13    1,982,611     $ 25.67
                          

The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2005:

 

     Options outstanding    Options exercisable

Range of exercise

    prices per share    

   Number of
options
   Weighted
average
exercise price
   Weighted average
remaining
contractual life
   Number of
options
   Weighted
average
exercise price

$21.63 to $25.99

   756,390    $ 23.28    4.2 years    756,390    $ 23.28

$26.00 to $31.99

   746,282    $ 29.76    5.0 years    746,282    $ 29.76

$32.00 to $41.99

   433,008    $ 37.21    7.9 years    282,655    $ 37.14

$42.00 to $57.71

   881,907    $ 48.75    9.3 years    111,218    $ 42.77
                  
   2,817,587    $ 35.11    6.6 years    1,896,545    $ 29.04
                  

 

F-35


Table of Contents

SHURGARD STORAGE CENTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Restricted Stock

Restricted shares entitle the grantees to all shareholder rights with respect to voting and receipt of dividends during the restriction period, except restricted stock may not be sold, assigned, transferred, pledged or otherwise disposed of prior to vesting. The shares generally vest ratably over 5 years. If a grantee’s employment is terminated prior to the end of the five-year period, the unvested shares will be forfeited. The table below presents the activity for restricted shares:

 

     2005     2004     2003  
     (in thousands except share and per
share data)
 

Restricted shares granted (1)

     37,528       51,130       101,650  

Restricted shares forfeited

     (8,656 )     (8,317 )     (3,651 )

Average fair value of restricted shares granted

   $ 56.66     $ 41.68     $ 37.08  

Compensation expense for restricted shares

   $ 1,575     $ 2,559     $ 948  

(1) The 2003 grants include a special award to an officer in December 2003 of 38,889 shares of restricted stock with an accelerated vesting term of six months and 17,584 shares with ratable vesting over a four-year term commencing in December 2003.

Other Stock Compensation and Benefit Plans

In 1996, we established an employee stock purchase plan under which U.S. employees can elect to purchase Shurgard stock through regular periodic payroll deductions without paying broker commissions. This plan provides for potential price discounts of up to 15%. Since January 2000, a 10% discount has been offered to employees under this plan.

We have an employee retirement savings plan, which includes an employee incentive savings plan (the 401(k) plan) and an employee stock ownership plan (the ESOP), in which substantially all our U.S. employees are eligible to participate. Under the 401(k) plan, each year, employees may contribute an amount not to exceed the maximum allowable by law. We match a portion of employee contributions in cash. Our expense for contributions to the 401(k) plan was approximately $880,000, $680,000 and $580,000 for 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Employees may direct the investment of all contributions to the 401(k) plan in one or more of ten mutual fund investment options administered by a third party, but cannot invest them directly in Shurgard stock. Under our ESOP, U.S. employees may receive discretionary annual awards of Shurgard stock that are determined as a percentage of the eligible employees’ salaries. ESOP contributions are funded in cash, which the plan uses to purchase Shurgard stock on the open market. Funded shares are held in individual participant accounts and may not be sold by participants while they are in the employ of Shurgard. Our expense for contributions to the ESOP was approximately $800,000, $720,000 and $620,000 for 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

In 2004, we implemented a stock appreciation rights plan in Europe whereby participants are entitled to receive a payment based on the appreciation of our common stock and dividends paid over the vesting period. The rights fully vest at the end of a three-year period and are generally forfeited if a participant’s employment is terminated prior to maturity. We recognize a liability for these rights and adjust it each reporting period based on the current stock price and dividend rights accrued for all rights outstanding. The expense is recognized through earnings ratably over the three-year vesting period. If a right is forfeited, we reduce the liability to reflect the forfeiture and reverse the compensation expense previously recognized. In 2005, we recognized compensation expense of approximately $760,000 related to this plan, compared to $670,000 in 2004. Also, we recognized expenses of $1.1 million and $970,000 in 2005 and in 2004, respectively, for various defined contribution plans in Europe.

 

F-36


Table of Contents

SHURGARD STORAGE CENTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

We have entered into an agreement with each of our executive officers that provides for payments in the event that the officer’s employment is terminated by us other than for cause, or by the employee for good reason, within two years after certain business combination transactions, including, but not limited to, the proposed merger with Public Storage, Inc. (Public Storage). In the event of such a termination, the officer would be entitled to payment of two and one-half times his or her annual salary plus his or her bonus. In addition, in the event the payments made under one of these agreements are subject to certain taxation, the officer would be entitled to additional payments necessary to reimburse him or her for such additional tax payment.

Note 17—Shareholder Rights Plan

In March 2004, we adopted an amended and restated rights agreement and declared a distribution of one right for each outstanding share of our common stock. The rights expire in March 2014. Under certain conditions, each right may be exercised to purchase one one-hundredth of a share of Series A junior participating preferred stock at a purchase price of $110, subject to adjustment. The rights will be exercisable only if a person or group has acquired 10% or more of the outstanding shares of common stock, or following the commencement of a tender or exchange offer for 10% or more of such outstanding shares of common stock, other than in connection with a transaction approved by our board of directors. If a person or group acquires more than 10% of the then outstanding shares of common stock, each right will entitle its holder to purchase, common stock (or, in certain circumstances, cash, property or other securities of Shurgard) having a value equal to two times the exercise price of the right. In addition, if Shurgard is acquired in a merger or other business combination transaction other than a transaction approved by our board of directors, each right will entitle its holder to purchase that number of the acquiring company’s common shares having a market value of twice the right’s exercise price. We will be entitled to redeem the rights at $0.0001 per right at any time prior to the earlier of their expiration or the time that a person has acquired a 10% position. In March 2006, we amended the rights agreement (i) to clarify that the rights agreement does not apply to, and the rights are not exercisable in connection with, our the Agreement and Plan of Merger (Merger Agreement) dated March 6, 2006, with Public Storage or the proposed merger that it contemplates and (ii) to provide that in addition to the expiration provisions set forth in the rights agreement, the rights will expire at the effective time of the proposed merger. The rights do not have voting or distribution rights, and until they become exercisable, have no dilutive effect on our earnings.

 

F-37


Table of Contents

SHURGARD STORAGE CENTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Note 18—Net Income Per Common Share

The following summarizes the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:

 

     2005     2004     2003  
     (in thousands except share data)  

Results of operations—Numerator

      

(Loss) income from continuing operations

   $ (590 )   $ 29,466     $ 35,314  

Preferred distributions and other

     (12,153 )     (12,193 )     (12,082 )
                        

(Loss) income from continuing operations available to common shareholders

     (12,743 )     17,273       23,232  

Discontinued operations

     12,249       18,168       2,324  

Cumulative effect of accounting changes

     —         (2,339 )     —    
                        

Net (loss) income available to common shareholders

   $ (494 )   $ 33,102     $ 25,556  
                        

Weighted average share amounts—Denominator

      

Basic weighted average shares outstanding

     46,660       45,968       40,406  

Effect of dilutive stock based awards

     —         658       582  
                        

Diluted weighted average shares outstanding

     46,660       46,626       40,988  
                        

Basic per share amounts

      

(Loss) income from continuing operations available to common shareholders

   $ (0.27 )   $ 0.37     $ 0.57  

Discontinued operations

     0.26       0.40       0.06  

Cumulative effect of accounting changes

     —         (0.05 )     —    
                        

Net (loss) income available to common shareholders

   $ (0.01 )   $ 0.72     $ 0.63  
                        

Diluted per share amounts

      

(Loss) income from continuing operations available to common shareholders

   $ (0.27 )   $ 0.37     $ 0.56  

Discontinued operations

     0.26       0.39       0.06  

Cumulative effect of accounting changes

     —         (0.05 )     —    
                        

Net (loss) income available to common shareholders

   $ (0.01 )   $ 0.71     $ 0.62  
                        

We have excluded the following non-dilutive stock options and unvested common stock awards for certain periods from the computation of diluted earnings per share, because the options’ exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the common shares or the Company incurred a loss from continuing operations available to common shareholders during the reporting period:

 

     2005    2004    2003

Number of options

   2.8 million    531,000    416,000

Range of exercise prices

   $21.63 to $57.71    $38.61 to $43.68    $33.91 to $37.60

Expiration on or before

   December 2015    December 2014    December 2013

Unvested common stock awards

   113,000    41,000    94,000

Note 19—Discontinued Operations

In 2004, we designated eight storage centers, six of which are located in California and the others in Texas and Washington, as discontinued operations. We sold six of those properties in 2004 for an aggregate gain of $16.2 million. We sold the remaining two in 2005 for aggregate proceeds of $14.1 million and an aggregate gain of $6.4 million.

 

F-38


Table of Contents

SHURGARD STORAGE CENTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

In 2005, we sold one storage center in Arizona and two in Washington for aggregate proceeds of approximately $10.7 million, resulting in aggregate gains of approximately $5.4 million. We have presented the results of operations and gains on sales of these storage centers as discontinued operations for all periods presented. Furthermore, as of December 31, 2005, we had two storage centers designated as held for sale on our balance sheet. The results of operations of storage centers held for sale were included in our domestic Same Store segment (also see Note 25).

The following table summarizes income from discontinued operations:

 

     2005     2004     2003  
     (in thousands)  

Discontinued operations:

      

Revenue

   $ 903     $ 4,355     $ 5,360  

Operating expense

     (386 )     (1,788 )     (2,194 )

Depreciation and amortization

     (99 )     (625 )     (842 )
                        

Operating income from discontinued operations

     418       1,942       2,324  

Gain on sale of properties

     11,831       16,226       —    
                        

Discontinued operations

   $ 12,249     $ 18,168     $ 2,324  
                        

Note 20—Segment Reporting

Shurgard currently has four reportable segments: Domestic Same Store and New Store and European Same Store and New Store. We have adjusted the previously reported segment information for 2003 to include our European segments’ information; however, the new composition of our segments is additive only and does not change previously reported segment results for our domestic operations. For the purpose of reconciliation of the segment reporting to the consolidated statement of operations, the 2003 results of our European segments are classified in unconsolidated joint ventures.

Our definition of Same Store includes existing storage centers acquired prior to January 1 of the previous year, as well as developed properties that have been operating for a full two years as of January 1 of the current year. We project that newly developed properties will reach stabilization in approximately 24-48 months. New Store includes existing facilities that had not been acquired as of January 1 of the previous year, as well as developed properties that have not been operating a full two years as of January 1 of the current year.

These reportable segments allow us to focus on improving results from our existing real estate assets and renting up our new facilities. We evaluate each segment’s performance based on net operating income (NOI) and NOI after indirect and leasehold expenses. NOI is defined as storage center operations revenue less direct operating expenses, but does not include any allocation of indirect operating expenses. Indirect and leasehold expenses include land or building lease expense and certain shared property costs such as bank fees, district and corporate management, purchasing, national contracts personnel and marketing, as well as certain overhead costs allocated to property operations such as business information technology, legal services, human resources and accounting. Indirect operating expenses are allocated to storage centers based on number of months in operation during the period and do not include containerized storage operations, internal real estate acquisition costs or abandoned development expenses.

Using the definition of Same Store and New Store described above, the portfolio of assets reported in these segments changes from year to year. Assets transition from New Store to Same Store over time. As of December 31, 2005, the goodwill balance was $27.4 million of which we allocated $24.2 million to our domestic

 

F-39


Table of Contents

SHURGARD STORAGE CENTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

reporting units and $3.2 million to our European reporting units. The following table illustrates the results using the 2005 Same Store and New Store bases for reportable segments as of and for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004. Same Store includes all storage centers acquired prior to January 1, 2004, and developments opened prior to January 1, 2003. New Store represents all storage centers acquired after January 1, 2004, and developments opened after January 1, 2003. Other Stores include properties no longer in service, properties closed in the process of being redeveloped, or disposed properties in which we have no remaining ownership interest as of December 31, 2005.

 

    2005
    Domestic
Same Store
  Domestic
New Store
  Europe
Same Store
  Europe
New Store
    Other
Stores
  Discontinued
Stores
    Total
    (in thousands)

Storage center operations revenue

  $ 329,002   $ 23,432   $ 101,819   $ 24,698     $ 922   $ (903 )   $ 478,970

Direct operating expense

    112,002     11,545     42,592     20,714       349     (322 )     186,880
                                             

Net operating income

    217,000     11,887     59,227     3,984       573     (581 )     292,090
                                             

Indirect expense

    16,989     1,453     11,907     6,512       69     (64 )     36,866

Leasehold expense

    4,157     379     2,299     325       —       —         7,160
                                             

Indirect and leasehold expense

    21,146     1,832     14,206     6,837       69     (64 )     44,026
                                             

Net operating income (loss) after indirect and leasehold expense

  $ 195,854   $ 10,055   $ 45,021   $ (2,853 )   $ 504   $ (517 )   $ 248,064
                                             

Segment operating storage center assets, net

  $ 1,395,141   $ 211,201   $ 710,284   $ 359,527     $ 3,112   $ (2,175 )   $ 2,677,090
                                             

Total Storage center additions

  $ 221,534   $ 68,383   $ 58,318   $ 103,855     $ —     $ —       $ 452,090
                                             
    2004
    Domestic
Same Store
  Domestic
New Store
  Europe
Same Store
  Europe
New Store
    Other
Stores
  Discontinued
Stores
    Total
    (in thousands)

Storage center operations revenue

  $ 309,228   $ 7,010   $ 90,948   $ 11,161     $ 5,195   $ (4,355 )   $ 419,187

Direct operating expense

    103,583     5,759     41,141     13,973       2,026     (1,520 )     164,962
                                             

Net operating income

    205,645     1,251     49,807     (2,812 )     3,169     (2,835 )     254,225
                                             

Indirect expense

    14,975     664     12,025     5,291       276     (268 )     32,963

Leasehold expense

    4,114     53     1,892     215       —       —         6,274
                                             

Indirect and leasehold expense

    19,089     717     13,917     5,506       276     (268 )     39,237
                                             

Net operating income (loss) after indirect and leasehold expense

  $ 186,556   $ 534   $ 35,890   $ (8,318 )   $ 2,893   $ (2,567 )   $ 214,988
                                             

Segment operating storage center assets, net

  $ 1,414,307   $ 164,591   $ 759,374   $ 299,657     $ 9,230   $ —       $ 2,647,159
                                             

Total Storage center additions

  $ 205,900   $ 99,248   $ 16,375   $ 100,392     $ —     $ —       $ 421,915
                                             

 

F-40


Table of Contents

SHURGARD STORAGE CENTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

The following table illustrates the results using the 2004 Same Store and New Store base for reportable segments as of and for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003. Same Store includes all storage centers acquired prior to January 1, 2003, and all developments opened prior to January 1, 2002. New Store represent all storage centers acquired after January 1, 2003, and developments opened after January 1, 2002:

 

    2004  
    Domestic
Same Store
  Domestic
New Store
  Europe
Same Store
    Europe
New Store
    Other
Store
    Discontinued
Stores
    Total  
    (in thousands)  

Storage center operations revenue

  $ 288,167   $ 30,591   $ 73,241     $ 28,868     $ 2,675     $ (4,355 )   $ 419,187  

Direct operating expense

    93,918     16,283     30,539       24,575       1,167       (1,520 )     164,962  
                                                   

Net operating income

    194,249     14,308     42,702       4,293       1,508       (2,835 )     254,225  
                                                   

Indirect expense

    14,103     1,684     8,781       8,535       128       (268 )     32,963  

Leasehold expense

    3,736     431     1,620       487       —         —         6,274  
                                                   

Indirect and leasehold expense

    17,839     2,115     10,401       9,022       128       (268 )     39,237  
                                                   

Net operating income (loss) after indirect and leasehold expense

  $ 176,410   $ 12,193   $ 32,301     $ (4,729 )   $ 1,380     $ (2,567 )   $ 214,988  
                                                   

Segment operating storage center assets, net

  $ 1,249,893   $ 334,181   $ 541,367     $ 517,664     $ 4,054     $ —       $ 2,647,159  
                                                   

Total Storage center additions

  $ 195,701   $ 102,434   $ 10,127     $ 106,640     $ —       $ —       $ 414,902  
                                                   
    2003  
    Domestic
Same Store
  Domestic
New Store
  Europe
Same Store
    Europe
New Store
    Other
Store
    Discontinued
Stores
    Total  
    (in thousands)  

Segment revenue

  $ 275,397   $ 13,437   $ 60,707     $ 10,065     $ 7,841     $ (5,360 )   $ 362,087  

Less unconsolidated joint ventures

    —       —       (60,707 )     (10,065 )     (230 )     —         (71,002 )
                                                   

Consolidated revenue

    275,397     13,437     —         —         7,611       (5,360 )     291,085  

Direct operating expense

    91,401     8,956     25,136       12,661       3,619       (1,874 )     139,899  

Less unconsolidated joint ventures

    —       —       (25,136 )     (12,661 )     (131 )     —         (37,928 )
                                                   

Consolidated direct operating expense

    91,401     8,956     —         —         3,488       (1,874 )     101,971  
                                                   

Consolidated NOI

    183,996     4,481     —         —         4,123       (3,486 )     189,114  
                                                   

Indirect expense

    12,767     865     8,734       5,529       369       (320 )     27,944  

Leasehold expense

    3,241     445     1,433       247       —         —         5,366  

Less unconsolidated joint ventures

    —       —       (10,167 )     (5,776 )     (11 )     —         (15,954 )
                                                   

Consolidated indirect and leasehold expense

    16,008     1,310     —         —         358       (320 )     17,356  
                                                   

Consolidated NOI after indirect and leasehold expense

  $ 167,988   $ 3,171   $ —       $ —       $ 3,765     $ (3,166 )   $ 171,758  
                                                   

Segment operating storage center assets, net

  $ 1,294,584   $ 245,193   $ —       $ —       $ 32,107     $ —       $ 1,571,884  
                                                   

Total Storage center additions

  $ 168,247   $ 182,046   $ —       $ —       $ —       $ —       $ 350,293  
                                                   

 

F-41


Table of Contents

SHURGARD STORAGE CENTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

The following table reconciles the reportable segments’ direct and indirect operating expense to consolidated operating expense, for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003:

 

     2005    2004    2003
     (in thousands)

Consolidated direct operating expense

   $ 186,880    $ 164,962    $ 101,971

Consolidated indirect operating and leasehold expense

     44,026      39,237      17,356

Other operating expense, net

     2,100      7,181      6,553
                    

Consolidated operating expense

   $ 233,006    $ 211,380    $ 125,880
                    

The following table reconciles the reportable segments’ NOI per the table above to consolidated net income for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003:

 

     2005     2004     2003  
     (in thousands)  

Consolidated NOI after indirect and leasehold expense

   $ 248,064     $ 214,988     $ 171,758  

Other revenue

     4,922       5,101       6,877  

Other operating expense, net

     (2,100 )     (7,181 )     (6,553 )

Real estate development expense

     (10,042 )     (4,991 )     (23 )

Depreciation and amortization

     (95,722 )     (87,503 )     (55,537 )

Impairment and abandoned project expense

     (3,354 )     (2,856 )     (13,889 )

General, administrative and other

     (35,318 )     (32,961 )     (18,012 )

Costs related to takeover proposal and exploration of strategic alternatives

     (13,775 )     —         —    

Interest expense

     (105,584 )     (82,876 )     (51,182 )

Amortization of participation rights discount

     —         1,123       5,529  

Loss on derivatives, net

     (2,122 )     (615 )     (2,194 )

Foreign exchange (loss) gain

     (9,665 )     6,247       (431 )

Interest income and other, net

     3,746       4,361       4,887  

Minority interest

     20,936       16,608       (1,206 )

Equity in earnings (losses) of other real estate investments, net

     60       93       (3,099 )

Income tax expense

     (636 )     (72 )     (1,611 )
                        

(Loss) income from continuing operations

   $ (590 )   $ 29,466     $ 35,314  
                        

The following table reconciles the reportable segments’ assets to consolidated assets as of December 31, 2005 and 2004:

 

     As of December 31,
     2005    2004
     (in thousands)

Segment operating storage centers assets, net

   $ 2,677,090    $ 2,647,159

Non storage centers and properties held for sale

     9,093      10,628

Corporate assets, net

     12,678      14,498
             

Storage centers, net

     2,698,861      2,672,285

Construction in progress

     67,073      58,431
             

Total storage centers

     2,765,934      2,730,716

Cash and cash equivalents

     39,778      50,277

Restricted cash

     4,972      7,181

Goodwill

     27,440      24,206

Other assets

     119,248      128,204
             

Total assets

   $ 2,957,372    $ 2,940,584
             

 

F-42


Table of Contents

SHURGARD STORAGE CENTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Note 21—Supplemental Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)

We separately report as discontinued operations the historical operating results attributable to operating properties sold and held for sale and the applicable gain or loss on the disposition of the properties. As a result, we have made the appropriate reclassification adjustments to our previously issued financial statements for the quarters ended March 31, June 30, and September 30, and December 31, 2005 and 2004.

 

     Three months ended
     March 31,
2005
    June 30,
2005
    September 30,
2005 (1)
    December 31,
2005
     (in thousands, except share data)

Revenue

   $ 113,625     $ 119,467     $ 125,484     $ 125,316

Income from operations

     19,921       23,909       31,728       30,892

Income (loss) from continuing operations

     (1,332 )     (865 )     (3,903 )     5,510

Net income (loss)

     5,256       (693 )     1,590       5,506

Basic per share amounts

        

(Loss) income from continuing operations available to common shareholders

   $ (0.09 )   $ (0.08 )   $ (0.15 )   $ 0.05

Discontinued operations

     0.14       —         0.12       —  
                              

Net income (loss) available to common shareholders per share

   $ 0.05     $ (0.08 )   $ (0.03 )   $ 0.05
                              

Diluted per share amounts

        

(Loss) income from continuing operations available to common shareholders

   $ (0.09 )   $ (0.08 )   $ (0.15 )   $ 0.05

Discontinued operations

     0.14       —         0.12       —  
                              

Net income (loss) available to common shareholders per share

   $ 0.05     $ (0.08 )   $ (0.03 )   $ 0.05
                              

(1) In the third quarter of 2005, we recognized a $12.7 million expense associated with the merger proposal and exploration of strategic alternatives. See Note 22.

 

     Three months ended
     March 31,
2004
    June 30,
2004
   September 30,
2004
   December 31,
2004
     (in thousands, except share data)

Revenue

   $ 99,075     $ 104,153    $ 109,701    $ 111,359

Income from operations

     18,939       24,008      26,967      14,683

Income from continuing operations

     1,429       8,095      13,574      6,368

Income before cumulative effect of change

     2,034       20,807      18,153      6,640

Net (loss) income

     (305 )     20,807      18,153      6,640

Basic per share amounts

          

(Loss) income from continuing operations available to common shareholders

   $ (0.03 )   $ 0.11    $ 0.23    $ 0.07

Discontinued operations

     0.01       0.28      0.10      0.01

Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle

     (0.05 )     —        —        —  
                            

Net income (loss) available to common shareholders per share

   $ (0.07 )   $ 0.39    $ 0.33    $ 0.08
                            

Diluted per share amounts

          

(Loss) income from continuing operations available to common shareholders

   $ (0.03 )   $ 0.11    $ 0.23    $ 0.07

Discontinued operations

     0.01       0.27      0.10      0.01

Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle

     (0.05 )     —        —        —  
                            

Net income (loss) available to common shareholders per share

   $ (0.07 )   $ 0.38    $ 0.33    $ 0.08
                            

 

F-43


Table of Contents

SHURGARD STORAGE CENTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Note 22—Commitments and contingencies

The following tables summarize our contractual obligations and our off-balance sheet commitments as of December 31, 2005.

 

     Payments due by period
     Total    2006    2007-2008    2009-2010    2011 and
beyond
     (in thousands)

Contractual Obligations

              

Long-term debt

   $ 1,853,061    $ 9,226    $ 878,352    $ 48,607    $ 916,876

Capital and operating lease obligations

     217,854      10,127      17,049      13,042      177,636
                                  

Totals

   $ 2,070,915    $ 19,353    $ 895,401    $ 61,649    $ 1,094,512
                                  
     Amount of commitment expiration per period
     Total
amounts
committed
   2006    2007-2008    2009-2010    2011 and
beyond
     (in thousands)

Other Commercial Commitments & Contingent Liabilities

              

Development contract commitments (1)

   $ 51,697    $ 50,775    $ 347    $ 575    $ —  

Commitment to purchase interests (2)

     2,000      2,000      —        —        —  

Loan commitments (3)

     4,187      4,129      58      —        —  

Outstanding letters of credit and other (4)

     3,718      3,718      —        —        —  
                                  

Totals

   $ 61,602    $ 60,622    $ 405    $ 575    $ —  
                                  

(1) Includes costs to complete property development and redevelopment projects conducted with contractors. We computed the outstanding commitment based on total estimated project costs less costs incurred to date. This includes $21.1 million of development commitments on our European joint ventures in which we have a 20% ownership interest.
(2) Includes a commitment to purchase the ownership interest of a minority interest.
(3) Includes loan commitments to a California developer to finance the construction of certain storage centers according to our specifications.
(4) Includes primarily an outstanding letter of credit related to our insurance trust for workmen’s compensation and of letters of credit related to properties under construction.

Legal Proceedings

On March 7, 2006, Doris Staer filed a purported class action suit in the Superior Court of Washington for King County styled as Doris Staer v. Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc., Charles K. Barbo, Anna Karin Andrews, Raymond A. Johnson, W. Thomas Porter, Gary E. Pruitt, David K. Grant, Howard P. Behar and Richard P. Fox (Case No. 06-2-08148-0 SEA) alleging self-dealing and breaches of fiduciary duties. Ms. Staer claims that Shurgard and the named directors breached their fiduciary duties in connection with the approval of our Merger Agreement with Public Storage, Inc. and seeks among other things to enjoin the transaction. We believe that our actions and the actions of our board of directors were appropriate.

We are a defendant in litigation filed on September 17, 2002, in the Superior Court of California for Orange County styled as Gary Drake v. Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc. et al (Case No. 02CC00152). The complaint

 

F-44


Table of Contents

SHURGARD STORAGE CENTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

alleges that we misrepresented the size of our storage units, seeks class action status and seeks damages, injunctive relief and declaratory relief against us under California statutory and common law relating to consumer protection, unfair competition, fraud and deceit and negligent misrepresentation. The Court recently ruled that the class of potential members in this lawsuit is limited to our California customers. No class has yet been certified. It is possible that we may incur losses as a result of this litigation, but we currently do not believe that the range of such losses would be material to our financial position, operating results or cash flows. However, we cannot presently determine the potential total damages, if any, or the ultimate outcome of the litigation. We are vigorously defending this action.

In addition, from time to time we are subject to various legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of business. Although we cannot predict the outcomes of these proceedings with certainty, we do not believe that the disposition of these matters and the matters discussed above will have a material adverse effect on our financial position, operating results or cash flows. We expense legal costs on legal proceedings as incurred.

Takeover Proposal and Exploration of Strategic Alternatives

By letter dated July 8, 2005, Public Storage, Inc. made an unsolicited takeover proposal to acquire us through a fully taxable all stock transaction pursuant to which 0.8 shares of Public Storage common stock would be exchanged for each outstanding share of Shurgard common stock. The board of directors met on July 22, 2005 and, with the assistance of financial and legal advisors, conducted a thorough review of the proposal and unanimously decided to reject the proposal. The board of directors determined that a combination of the companies on the terms proposed would not be in the best interests of our shareholders and communicated our rejection of the proposal by letter to Public Storage dated July 26, 2005. On August 1, 2005, Public Storage publicly disclosed its interest in combining the two companies on the same terms previously presented, and Shurgard publicly reiterated its rejection of that proposal.

On October 27, 2005, we announced that our board of directors has authorized management and our financial advisors to explore reasonably available strategic alternatives to maximize shareholder value. These alternatives include, but are not limited to, a sale of the Company, the formation of asset joint ventures with strategic partners, a sale of certain of our assets or operations, and continued implementation of our strategic business plan.

On March 6, 2006, we entered into a Merger Agreement, dated as of March 6, 2006, with Public Storage, that contemplates a merger whereby we will be merged with and into a subsidiary of Public Storage. Each outstanding share of our common stock will be converted into the right to receive 0.82 of a fully paid and non-assessable share of Public Storage common stock, and we expect to redeem each series of our outstanding preferred stock in accordance with its terms. Public Storage will assume approximately $1.8 billion of our debt. Holders of Shurgard’s stock options, restricted stock units and shares of restricted stock will receive, subject to adjustments, options exercisable for shares of Public Storage common stock, restricted stock units and restricted shares of Public Storage common stock, respectively.

Our board of directors and the board of directors of Public Storage have approved the Merger Agreement. The proposed merger is subject to our shareholders’ approval, Public Storage’s shareholders’ approval of the issuance of shares of Public Storage stock to be used as merger consideration and other customary closing conditions.

We have made certain representations and warranties in the Merger Agreement and have agreed to certain covenants, including, among others, subject to certain exceptions, to permit our board of directors to comply with its fiduciary duties, and not to solicit, negotiate, provide information in furtherance of, approve, recommend or enter into any other acquisition proposal (as defined in the Merger Agreement).

 

F-45


Table of Contents

SHURGARD STORAGE CENTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

The Merger Agreement contains representations and warranties that the parties have made to each other as of specific dates. The assertions embodied in those representations and warranties were made solely for purposes of the contract between the parties, and may be subject to important qualifications and limitations agreed to by the parties in connection with negotiating its terms. Moreover, the representations and warranties are subject to a contractual standard of materiality that may be different from what may be viewed as material to shareholders, and the representations and warranties may have been intended not as statements of fact, but rather as a way of allocating risk between the parties. This description of certain terms of the Merger Agreement does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the Merger Agreement, a copy of which is filed with our current report on Form 8-K dated March 7, 2006.

We have entered into engagement letters with our financial advisors for services to be rendered in connection with the takeover proposal and an exploration of strategic alternatives. Combined minimum fee obligations under these agreements total $12 million for services to be rendered to us over a period of up to 18 months, which commenced in July 2005. We expensed the entire $12 million combined minimum fee obligation in 2005. As of December 31, 2005, $11.4 million of accrued minimum fee obligations were included in other liabilities. We expensed an additional $1.8 million in legal fees and reimbursements of expenses as incurred in 2005. As a result of entering into the Merger Agreement with Public Storage in March 2006, we will incur $12 million of additional financial advisory fees plus out of pocket expenses in 2006. Of the total $23.4 million financial advisory fees payable in 2006, approximately $10.5 million are due during the first quarter of 2006; the balance of $12.9 million will become payable upon consummation of the proposed merger.

Note 23—Related Party Transactions

Charles K. Barbo, our chief executive officer though January 1, 2006, and chairman of our board of directors, indirectly owns a 0.5% ownership interest in a limited partnership known as Shurgard Institutional Fund L.P. I, a consolidated subsidiary of Shurgard. Shurgard owns a 99% interest in this entity.

Recom, a consolidated Belgian subsidiary as of June 28, 2003, made a subordinated loan to Shurgard Europe in 1999. In September 2003, Recom and other Shurgard Europe warrant holders exercised their warrants to purchase additional equity interests in Shurgard Europe. The majority of the warrants were held by Recom which upon exercise, exchanged $139.6 million of the subordinated loan payable, an amount equal to the exercise price of the warrants. Cash proceeds from the exercise of the remaining warrants and other borrowings by Shurgard Europe were used to repay the remaining $7.5 million balance of the subordinated loan payable.

On July 8, 2003, we loaned €1.9 million ($2.2 million based on exchange rates as of July 8, 2003, which rates were applied in all the amounts listed below) to E-Parco, a Belgian company owned by certain employees of Shurgard Europe. E-Parco had an indirect ownership interest in Shurgard Europe through Recom. The proceeds of this loan were used by E-Parco to repurchase its shares from Mr. Grant, an officer of the Company, and certain other employees of Shurgard Europe. We paid €1.2 million ($1.4 million as of July 2, 2003) to Mr. Grant for his shares and €0.7 million ($0.8 million as of July 2, 2003) was paid to the other former employees for their shares. The purchase price for the E-Parco shares was based on recent third party sales transactions for interests in Shurgard Europe. As partial consideration for the loan, E-Parco granted Shurgard an option to purchase its 377 Recom shares for €4.3 million ($5.3 million on July 2, 2004) plus forgiveness of the loan including accrued interest. We exercised the option on June 1, 2004 and closed the purchase of E-Parco shares on July 2, 2004. Since July 2, 2004, we have been the sole shareholder of Recom.

On June 30, 2003, we issued $20 million of our Class A common stock in exchange for notes receivable from shareholders. The shares were initially recorded as a reduction of shareholders’ equity that secured

 

F-46


Table of Contents

SHURGARD STORAGE CENTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

$20 million in mortgage debt assumed in the purchase of Minnesota Mini-Storage (see Note 4). The notes from shareholders were collateralized by a pledge of the shareholders’ Shurgard common stock and were paid in full in October 2003, and we reclassified the $20 million to shareholders’ equity.

In April 2003, we acquired the general partner interests in Shurgard Partners LP II (Shurgard Partners II), the general partner of Shurgard Institutional Fund LP II (Institutional II), a consolidated entity, for $0.2 million. The acquired Shurgard Partners II general partner interests were owned by an unaffiliated third party and an officer of the Company. The acquisition was, in part, in response to the board of directors stated objective of eliminating existing historical arrangements involving related parties. The purchase price payable for the acquired Shurgard Partners II general partner interests was governed by the terms of the partnership agreements for Shurgard Partners II and Institutional II and was based on the fair market value of the property owned by Institutional II as determined by a third party appraisal. This transaction increased our ownership of Institutional II from 99% to 100%. Of the $0.2 million total purchase price, we paid $84,000 to Mr. Barbo, our Chief Executive Officer at the time, to acquire his partnership interest in Shurgard Partners II.

On May 27, 2002, we entered into a subscription agreement to purchase up to $50 million of three year 9.75% payment-in-kind cumulative preferred bonds to be issued at the option of Shurgard Europe. Pursuant to the subscription agreement, Shurgard Europe had the ability to issue up to $50 million of these preferred bonds to us during the first two years of the three-year commitment term. Shurgard Europe has the option of increasing our total notional subscription to $55 million with an additional $20 million that can be drawn by First Shurgard only in a potential event of a default on the five year debt facility between First Shurgard and a group of commercial banks. In February 2005, as part of a renegotiation of the covenants on the First Shurgard credit facility, an additional €5 million of subordinated bonds and a €2.5 million subordinated working capital facility was made available to First Shurgard. Interest is payable on the bonds at the end of each quarter in cash or through an issuance of additional bonds. Any bonds issued to pay interest can be issued above the commitment amount. Shurgard Europe must redeem the bonds on the redemption date, or may redeem at any time prior to the redemption date, by paying us 115% of the face value of the outstanding bonds plus accrued and unpaid interest. The subscription agreement with Shurgard Europe entitles us to a commitment fee of 0.5% and a structuring fee of 1.5% of the initial commitment of $50 million, as well as an unused fee equal to 1% of the undrawn amount payable in arrears on an annual basis. The subscription agreement with First Shurgard for the additional $20 million entitles us to a commitment fee of 2% of the $20 million. Prior to the consolidation of Shurgard Europe, these fees were recognized in income using the effective interest method over the extended term of the bonds. As of December 31, 2003, $55.3 million of U.S. dollar denominated bonds had been issued to us under this commitment including $6.0 million in additional bonds issued for accrued interest. The terms of the bonds provide that the parties will treat the bonds as an equity investment in Shurgard Europe for federal income tax purposes. The bonds income and fees related to the bonds are included in our consolidated statements of operations in interest income other, net for the period ended December 31, 2003. Shurgard Europe’s interest expense and fees related to this subscription agreement are also included in interest income and other and therefore the impact of interest is eliminated in the consolidated statements of operations as of December 31, 2003.

Note 24—Subsequent Events

On January 23, 2006, we completed the acquisition of 3S-Self-Storage Systems SAS in France a company that operates nine self-storage facilities in various metropolitan areas where we already have operating properties. We will incorporate the management of these properties with our existing portfolio of 39 self-storage centers in France. We completed the acquisition through our 20% owned Second Shurgard subsidiary for total consideration and acquisition costs of approximately $46 million. We financed the acquisition with $20.0 million from draws on Second Shurgard’s credit facility and the remainder with Second Shurgard’s cash from equity contributions.

 

F-47


Table of Contents

SHURGARD STORAGE CENTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

On February 16, 2006, our board of directors declared a fourth quarter dividend of $0.56 per common share. The dividend totals $26.4 million and was paid on March 13, 2006, to shareholders of record as of March 3, 2006.

Note 25—Reclassifications (Subsequent Event)

Subsequent to the filing of our annual report on Form 10-K on March 20, 2006, in conjunction with the planned merger with Public Storage, Shurgard terminated its plans to sell two domestic storage centers, which were classified as held for sale and reported as discontinued operations at December 31, 2005. Instead, management has determined it will hold such properties for the foreseeable future. Therefore, in accordance with SFAS 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” the accompanying consolidated statements of operations have been restated and the net results of operations from these properties have been reclassified to continuing operations from discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003. The effect of the reclassification represents a $277,000, or 32%, decrease in our previously reported net loss from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2005, and an increase in our previously reported net income from continuing operations of $235,000, or 0.8%, and $166,000, or 0.5%, for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. As a result of the foregoing, Notes 4, 18, 19, 20 and 21 to the consolidated financial statements for the three years ended December 31, 2005, have been updated. There is no effect on Shurgard’s previously reported net income, financial condition or cash flows.

 

F-48


Table of Contents

SCHEDULE III—REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

 

Property Name

  Location   State or
Country
(3)
  Encum-
brances
(2)
  INITIAL COST   Costs
Subsequent
to
Acquisition
    Gross Amount as of December 31, 2005     Owned
Since
  Year
Built
  Depr.
Life
in
mos.
        Land   Building,
Equip.
& Other
  Gross
Storage
Centers
    Land and
Land Held
for Sale
  Building
Equip.
& Other
  Gross
Storage
centers
  Accum.
Depr.
       

Ahwatukee

  Phoenix   AZ   $ —     $ 721   $ 2,469   $ 3,190   $ 40     $ 721   $ 2,509   $ 3,230   $ (677 )   1998   1998   360

Arrowhead

  Glendale   AZ     —       569     2,600     3,169     58       569     2,658     3,227     (735 )   1997   1997   360

Chandler

  Chandler   AZ     —       652     2,608     3,260     600       652     3,208     3,860     (1,282 )   1986   1986   360

Collonade Mall

  Phoenix   AZ     —       —       1,146     1,146     60       —       1,206     1,206     (407 )   1998   1997   275

Cooper Road

  Gilbert   AZ     —       376     2,398     2,774     59       376     2,457     2,833     (424 )   2001   2001   360

Desert Sky

  Phoenix   AZ     —       536     2,891     3,427     5       536     2,896     3,432     (452 )   2001   2001   360

Dobson Ranch

  Mesa   AZ     —       499     1,996     2,495     229       499     2,225     2,724     (767 )   1996   1978   360

Houghton

  Tucson   AZ     2,289     607     2,536     3,143     349       607     2,885     3,492     (579 )   2000   2000   360

Mesa

  Mesa   AZ     —       352     1,829     2,181     587       355     2,413     2,768     (1,045 )   1987   1985   360

Mill Avenue

  Tempe   AZ     —       147     1,799     1,946     105       431     1,620     2,051     (387 )   1999   1998   360

Oro Valley

  Tucson   AZ     —       561     2,930     3,491     5       561     2,935     3,496     (319 )   2003   2003   360

Phoenix

  Phoenix   AZ     —       670     2,697     3,367     209       656     2,920     3,576     (1,237 )   1985   1984   360

Phoenix East

  Phoenix   AZ     —       543     2,189     2,732     429       543     2,618     3,161     (1,097 )   1987   1984   360

Scottsdale Air Park

  Scottsdale   AZ     —       880     3,694     4,574     97       880     3,791     4,671     (1,129 )   1997   1997   360

Scottsdale North

  Scottsdale   AZ     —       1,093     4,811     5,904     449       1,093     5,260     6,353     (1,810 )   1985   1985   360

Scottsdale South

  Scottsdale   AZ     —       410     1,743     2,153     217       410     1,960     2,370     (878 )   1985   1976/85   360

Shea

  Scottsdale   AZ     —       786     3,165     3,951     283       807     3,427     4,234     (977 )   1997   1996   360

Speedway

  Tucson   AZ     —       744     2,304     3,048     799       773     3,074     3,847     (763 )   1998   1998   360

Tanque Verde

  Tucson   AZ     —       578     2,620     3,198     8       578     2,628     3,206     (387 )   2002   2002   360

Union Hills

  Phoenix   AZ     —       615     2,475     3,090     175       617     2,648     3,265     (691 )   1998   1998   360

Val Vista

  Gilbert   AZ     —       682     2,805     3,487     1,114       778     3,823     4,601     (766 )   1999   1999   360

Warner

  Tempe   AZ     —       313     1,352     1,665     280       313     1,632     1,945     (783 )   1995   1985   360

Alicia Parkway

  Laguna Hills   CA     —       1,729     7,027     8,756     434       1,729     7,461     9,190     (1,834 )   1998   1991   360

Aliso Viejo

  Aliso Viejo   CA     —       2,218     3,628     5,846     845       2,218     4,473     6,691     (1,455 )   1996   1996   360

Antioch

  Antioch   CA     3,281     638     4,366     5,004     513       678     4,839     5,517     (834 )   2000   2000   360

Blossom Valley

  San Jose   CA     —       1,204     4,128     5,332     628       1,212     4,748     5,960     (1,163 )   1998   1998   360

Cabot Road

  Laguna Niguel   CA     4,180     1,300     6,129     7,429     39       1,300     6,168     7,468     (922 )   2001   2000   360

Capitol Expressway

  San Jose   CA     —       973     6,181     7,154     (658 )     —       6,496     6,496     (1,157 )   2000   2000   360

Castro Valley

  Castro Valley   CA     —       810     4,010     4,820     318       907     4,231     5,138     (1,422 )   1996   1975   360

Castro Valley Business Park

  Castro Valley   CA     —       97     390     487     26       97     416     513     (144 )   1996   1975   360

 

F-49


Table of Contents

SCHEDULE III—REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION—(Continued)

 

Property Name

  Location   State or
Country
(3)
  Encum-
brances
(2)
  INITIAL COST   Costs
Subsequent
to
Acquisition
    Gross Amount as of December 31, 2005     Owned
Since
  Year
Built
  Depr.
Life
in
mos.
        Land   Building,
Equip.
& Other
  Gross
Storage
Centers
    Land and
Land Held
for Sale
  Building
Equip.
& Other
  Gross
Storage
centers
  Accum.
Depr.
       

Costa Mesa

  Costa Mesa   CA   2,407   1,057   2,956   4,013   287     882   3,418   4,300   (725 )   1999   1998   360

Culver City

  Culver City   CA   —     1,039   4,146   5,185   328     1,039   4,474   5,513   (1,831 )   1988   1989   360

Daly City

  Daly City   CA   —     1,846   5,438   7,284   901     1,846   6,339   8,185   (2,606 )   1995   1989   360

El Cajon

  El Cajon   CA   —     1,013   4,113   5,126   737     1,013   4,850   5,863   (2,066 )   1986   1977   360

El Cerito

  Richmond   CA   —     765   3,055   3,820   316     765   3,371   4,136   (1,348 )   1986   1987   360

Huntington Beach

  Huntington Beach   CA   —     949   3,794   4,743   522     949   4,316   5,265   (1,715 )   1988   1986   360

Kearney—Balboa

  San Diego   CA   —     830   3,333   4,163   494     830   3,827   4,657   (1,618 )   1986   1984   360

La Habra

  La Habra   CA   —     715   2,886   3,601   404     715   3,290   4,005   (1,397 )   1986   1979/91   360

Livermore

  Livermore   CA   —     1,185   4,622   5,807   (6 )   1,185   4,616   5,801   (663 )   2002   2002   360

Long Beach

  Long Beach   CA   —     1,190   6,601   7,791   760     1,190   7,361   8,551   (578 )   2003   2003   360

Martinez

  Martinez   CA   —     1,012   2,215   3,227   8,334     2,830   8,731   11,561   (1,700 )   1995   1987/2004   360

Monterey

  Sand City   CA   —     1,274   6,107   7,381   (4 )   1,274   6,103   7,377   (736 )   2002   2002   360

Mountain View

  Mountain View   CA   —     439   1,757   2,196   312     439   2,069   2,508   (864 )   1987   1986   360

Natomas

  Sacramento   CA   —     1,307   4,604   5,911   22     1,307   4,626   5,933   (349 )   2003   2003   360

Newark

  Newark   CA   —     855   3,421   4,276   499     855   3,920   4,775   (1,167 )   1996   1991   360

Northridge

  Northridge   CA   —     2,215   6,250   8,465   1,701     2,215   7,951   10,166   (454 )   2004   2004   360

Oakley

  Oakley   CA   —     1,570   4,655   6,225   17     1,570   4,672   6,242   (693 )   2001   2001   360

Ontario

  Ontario   CA   —     512   2,058   2,570   472     512   2,530   3,042   (696 )   1996   1984   360

Orange

  Orange   CA   —     1,144   4,580   5,724   96     1,144   4,676   5,820   (1,504 )   1996   1985   360

Palm Desert

  Palm Desert   CA   —     921   5,885   6,806   —       921   5,885   6,806   (105 )   2005   2005   360

Palms

  Los Angeles   CA   4,839   1,598   6,309   7,907   —       1,598   6,309   7,907   (409 )   2003   2001   360

Palo Alto

  Palo Alto   CA   —     701   2,805   3,506   596     705   3,397   4,102   (1,279 )   1986   1987   360

Pinole

  Pinole   CA   —     614   1,023   1,637   1,658     1,006   2,289   3,295   (672 )   1995   1988   360

Presidio

  San Francisco   CA   —     104   1,137   1,241   —       104   1,137   1,241   (40 )   2005   2005   360

Rancho Mirage

  Rancho Mirage   CA   —     912   5,313   6,225   1,125     957   6,393   7,350   (288 )   2004   2004   360

Rancho San Diego

  Rancho San Diego   CA   3,759   1,312   4,874   6,186   —       1,312   4,874   6,186   (519 )   2003   2002   360

Sacramento

  Sacramento   CA   —     680   2,723   3,403   132     680   2,855   3,535   (916 )   1996   1991   360

San Juan Creek

  San Juan Capistran   CA   4,693   1,450   5,526   6,976   1,345     1,450   6,871   8,321   (933 )   2001   2001   360

San Leandro

  San Leandro   CA   —     776   3,105   3,881   156     776   3,261   4,037   (1,080 )   1996   1991   360

San Lorenzo

  San Lorenzo   CA   —     611   2,447   3,058   212     611   2,659   3,270   (875 )   1996   1990   360

 

F-50


Table of Contents

SCHEDULE III—REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION—(Continued)

 

Property Name

  Location   State or
Country
(3)
  Encum-
brances
(2)
  INITIAL COST   Costs
Subsequent
to
Acquisition
  Gross Amount as of December 31, 2005     Owned
Since
  Year
Built
  Depr.
Life
in
mos.
        Land   Building,
Equip.
& Other
  Gross
Storage
Centers
    Land and
Land Held
for Sale
  Building
Equip.
& Other
  Gross
Storage
centers
  Accum.
Depr.
       

Santa Ana

  Santa Ana   CA   —     1,467   5,920   7,387   621   1,467   6,541   8,008   (2,704 )   1986   1975/86   360

SF-Evans

  San Francisco   CA   —     2,073   11,236   13,309   44   2,073   11,280   13,353   (1,155 )   2002   2002   360

Solana Beach

  Solana Beach   CA   —     —     6,837   6,837   620   —     7,457   7,457   (3,035 )   1987   1984   360

South San Francisco

  San Francisco   CA   —     721   2,897   3,618   333   721   3,230   3,951   (1,322 )   1987   1985   360

Sunnyvale

  Sunnyvale   CA   —     1,697   6,541   8,238   5,827   1,697   12,368   14,065   (3,750 )   1986   1975/98   360

Tracy

  Tracy   CA   —     732   2,928   3,660   279   732   3,207   3,939   (1,035 )   1996   1986   360

Tracy II

  Tracy   CA   —     840   2,858   3,698   42   826   2,914   3,740   (395 )   2002   2000   360

Union City

  Hayward   CA   —     287   1,208   1,495   197   287   1,405   1,692   (835 )   1985   1985   360

Van Ness

  San Francisco   CA   —     5,289   9,001   14,290   530   5,289   9,531   14,820   (1,878 )   1999   1999/1934   360

Vista Park-Land Lease

  San Jose   CA   —     —     93   93   4   —     97   97   (75 )   2001   2000   360

Walnut Creek

  Walnut Creek   CA   3,181   630   4,512   5,142   1,317   —     6,459   6,459   (1,430 )   1999   1987   327

West Covina

  West Covina   CA   3,896   1,470   4,869   6,339   8   1,470   4,877   6,347   (205 )   2004   2001   360

Westpark

  Irvine   CA   7,382   690   7,478   8,168   5,021   4,190   8,999   13,189   (1,841 )   2000   1999   360

Westwood

  Los Angeles   CA   —     951   3,797   4,748   4,318   951   8,115   9,066   (2,744 )   1986   1988/97   360

Woodland Hills

  Woodland Hills   CA   4,889   1,980   8,342   10,322   3   1,980   8,345   10,325   (297 )   2004   2003   360

Denver Tech Center

  Greenwood Village   CO   —     863   3,296   4,159   25   863   3,321   4,184   (265 )   2003   2003   360

Highlands Ranch

  Highlands Ranch   CO   —     594   2,822   3,416   155   596   2,975   3,571   (121 )   2004   2004   360

Kipling & Hampden

  Lakewood   CO   —     326   2,472   2,798   8   327   2,479   2,806   (340 )   2002   2002   360

Lakewood

  Golden   CO   —     528   2,108   2,636   238   528   2,346   2,874   (922 )   1986   1985   360

Northglenn

  Northglenn   CO   —     531   2,152   2,683   729   531   2,881   3,412   (1,237 )   1987   1979   360

Tamarac

  Denver   CO   —     194   776   970   225   194   1,001   1,195   (446 )   1984   1977   360

Thornton

  Denver   CO   —     237   956   1,193   204   235   1,162   1,397   (506 )   1984   1984   360

Windermere

  Littleton   CO   —     653   2,690   3,343   481   653   3,171   3,824   (1,364 )   1984   1977/79   360

Alafaya JV

  Orlando   FL   2,791   1,984   3,234   5,218   105   1,984   3,339   5,323   (473 )   2002   2002   360

Blue Heron

  West Palm Beach   FL   —     1,327   5,490   6,817   236   1,327   5,726   7,053   (2,384 )   1987   1975   360

Brandon

  Brandon   FL   2,999   973   3,423   4,396   143   989   3,550   4,539   (825 )   1999   1999   360

Carrollwood

  Tampa   FL   1,480   884   2,705   3,589   579   911   3,257   4,168   (666 )   2000   1999   360

 

F-51


Table of Contents

SCHEDULE III—REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION—(Continued)

 

Property Name

  Location   State or
Country
(3)
  Encum-
brances
(2)
  INITIAL COST   Costs
Subsequent
to
Acquisition
    Gross Amount as of December 31, 2005     Owned
Since
  Year
Built
  Depr.
Life
in
mos.
        Land   Building,
Equip.
& Other
  Gross
Storage
Centers
    Land and
Land Held
for Sale
  Building
Equip.
& Other
  Gross
Storage
centers
  Accum.
Depr.
       

Central Parkway

  Altamonte Springs   FL   —     1,166   3,972   5,138   —       1,166   3,972   5,138   (95 )   2005   1992   360

Colonial Town

  Orlando   FL   4,564   1,040   3,439   4,479   269     1,040   3,708   4,748   (565 )   2001   2001   360

Davie

  Davie   FL   —     1,890   3,021   4,911   3,997     2,633   6,275   8,908   (2,314 )   1996   1990   360

Daytona Beach

  Daytona Beach   FL   2,902   1,620   3,165   4,785   174     1,651   3,308   4,959   (729 )   1999   1999   360

Delray Beach

  Delray Beach   FL   —     748   2,993   3,741   347     748   3,340   4,088   (1,114 )   1996   1986   360

Eau Gallie

  Melbourne   FL   2,607   629   2,718   3,347   139     649   2,837   3,486   (640 )   1999   1999   360

Fairbanks

  Winter Park   FL   —     1,104   3,329   4,433   165     1,104   3,494   4,598   (411 )   2002   2002   360

Hunt Club

  Apopka   FL   —     764   3,614   4,378   —       764   3,614   4,378   (328 )   2003   2003   360

Hyde Park

  Tampa   FL   2,907   1,237   2,773   4,010   1,000     1,243   3,767   5,010   (761 )   2000   1999   360

Kirkman

  Orlando   FL   —     954   3,151   4,105   —       954   3,151   4,105   (74 )   2005   1990   360

Lauderhill

  Lauderhill   FL   —     761   3,164   3,925   325     761   3,489   4,250   (1,050 )   1997   1986   360

Maguire

  Orlando   FL   3,501   954   4,244   5,198   —       954   4,244   5,198   (26 )   2005   2005   360

Maitland

  Maitland   FL   4,426   74   4,985   5,059   575     106   5,528   5,634   (1,598 )   1997   1997   360

Margate

  Margate   FL   —     906   3,623   4,529   (9 )   906   3,614   4,520   (1,175 )   1996   1984   360

McCoy-Wells Fargo NW

  Orlando   FL   —     765   3,700   4,465   16     765   3,716   4,481   (542 )   2001   2001   360

Military Trail

  West Palm Beach   FL   —     1,140   4,564   5,704   222     1,140   4,786   5,926   (1,912 )   1987   1981   360

Oakland Park

  FT Lauderdale   FL   —     2,443   9,878   12,321   217     2,439   10,099   12,538   (4,073 )   1985   1974/78   360

Oldsmar

  Oldsmar   FL   2,273   606   2,787   3,393   155     628   2,920   3,548   (516 )   2000   2000   360

Ormond Beach

  Ormond Beach   FL   2,912   761   3,202   3,963   253     792   3,424   4,216   (739 )   1999   1999   360

Oviedo

  Oviedo   FL   2,744   527   2,716   3,243   331     535   3,039   3,574   (907 )   1997   1997   360

Red Bug

  Wintersprings   FL   2,530   856   2,951   3,807   150     825   3,132   3,957   (867 )   1997   1997   360

Seminole

  Seminole   FL   —     336   1,344   1,680   181     336   1,525   1,861   (654 )   1986   1984/85   360

South Orange

  Orlando   FL   3,032   715   2,709   3,424   349     741   3,032   3,773   (893 )   1997   1997   360

South Semoran

  Orlando   FL   2,701   933   3,184   4,117   862     965   4,014   4,979   (1,037 )   1997   1997   360

University

  Orlando   FL   —     1,140   4,374   5,514   7     1,140   4,381   5,521   (587 )   2002   2002   360

Vineland

  Orlando   FL   1,896   1,752   1,165   2,917   —       638   2,279   2,917   (522 )   1999   1999   360

West Town

  Altamonte Springs   FL   2,155   657   3,070   3,727   439     728   3,438   4,166   (843 )   1998   1998   360

West Waters

  Tampa   FL   2,269   950   3,569   4,519   168     950   3,737   4,687   (650 )   2000   2000   360

Ansley Park

  Atlanta   GA   —     804   3,255   4,059   3,130     1,301   5,888   7,189   (2,374 )   1995   1991   360

Brookhaven

  Atlanta   GA   —     1,082   2,223   3,305   2,589     1,568   4,326   5,894   (1,718 )   1995   1992   360

Clairmont Road

  Atlanta   GA   —     470   1,907   2,377   370     470   2,277   2,747   (723 )   1996   1990   360

 

F-52


Table of Contents

SCHEDULE III—REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION—(Continued)

 

Property Name

  Location   State or
Country
(3)
  Encum-
brances
(2)
  INITIAL COST   Costs
Subsequent
to
Acquisition
    Gross Amount as of December 31, 2005     Owned
Since
  Year
Built
  Depr.
Life
in
mos.
        Land   Building,
Equip.
& Other
  Gross
Storage
Centers
    Land and
Land Held
for Sale
  Building
Equip.
& Other
  Gross
Storage
centers
  Accum.
Depr.
       

Decatur

  Decatur   GA   —     644   2,719   3,363   2,665     1,111   4,917   6,028   (1,973 )   1995   1992   360

Forest Park

  Forest Park   GA   —     573   2,293   2,866   201     573   2,494   3,067   (850 )   1996   1980   360

Gwinnett Place

  Lawrenceville   GA   —     820   2,324   3,144   551     820   2,875   3,695   (948 )   1996   1996   360

Holcomb Bridge

  Roswell   GA   2,750   917   2,991   3,908   8     920   2,996   3,916   (582 )   1999   2000   360

Jones Bridge

  Alpharetta   GA   —     676   3,833   4,509   28     630   3,907   4,537   (1,038 )   1997   1997   360

Lawrenceville

  Lawrenceville   GA   —     858   3,064   3,922   162     858   3,226   4,084   (874 )   1997   1997   360

Morgan Falls

  Atlanta   GA   —     1,429   5,718   7,147   382     1,429   6,100   7,529   (1,985 )   1996   1990   360

Norcross

  Norcross   GA   —     562   2,248   2,810   193     562   2,441   3,003   (831 )   1996   1984   360

Peachtree

  Duluth   GA   —     1,144   4,784   5,928   213     1,144   4,997   6,141   (1,564 )   1997   1996   360

Perimeter Center

  Atlanta   GA   —     1,458   2,715   4,173   256     1,458   2,971   4,429   (1,030 )   1996   1996   360

Roswell

  Roswell   GA   —     435   1,743   2,178   289     435   2,032   2,467   (814 )   1986   1986   360

Sandy Plains

  Marietta   GA   —     1,012   4,066   5,078   449     1,012   4,515   5,527   (1,089 )   1998   1998   360

Satellite Blvd

  Atlanta   GA   —     670   2,831   3,501   146     670   2,977   3,647   (892 )   1997   1994   360

Stone Mountain

  Stone Mountain   GA   —     656   2,637   3,293   262     656   2,899   3,555   (961 )   1996   1985   360

Tucker

  Tucker   GA   —     241   656   897   509     241   1,165   1,406   (390 )   1996   1987   360

Alsip

  Alsip   IL   —     250   1,001   1,251   1,520     250   2,521   2,771   (824 )   1982   1980   360

Berwyn

  Berwyn   IL   —     868   5,375   6,243   69     868   5,444   6,312   (694 )   2002   2002   360

Bolingbrook

  Bolingbrook   IL   —     641   2,631   3,272   571     641   3,202   3,843   (838 )   1997   1997   360

Bridgeview

  Bridgeview   IL   —     479   1,917   2,396   253     479   2,170   2,649   (890 )   1985   1983   360

Chicago Heights

  Chicago Heights   IL   —     1,543   3,575   5,118   (5 )   1,543   3,570   5,113   (466 )   2002   2002   360

Country Club Hills

  Country Club Hills   IL   —     777   3,109   3,886   596     781   3,701   4,482   (789 )   1999   1999   360

Dolton

  Calumet City   IL   —     344   1,489   1,833   1,502     344   2,991   3,335   (1,003 )   1982   1979   360

Fox Valley

  Aurora   IL   —     927   2,986   3,913   30     932   3,011   3,943   (815 )   1998   1998   360

Fullerton

  Chicago   IL   —     3,325   6,965   10,290   98     3,325   7,063   10,388   (614 )   2003   2003   360

Glenview West

  Glenview   IL   —     1,003   3,878   4,881   25     1,003   3,903   4,906   (388 )   2003   2003   360

Hillside

  Hillside   IL   —     261   1,043   1,304   308     261   1,351   1,612   (516 )   1988   1988   360

Lincolnwood

  Lincolnwood   IL   —     818   4,356   5,174   5     818   4,361   5,179   (680 )   2001   2001   360

Lisle

  Lisle   IL   —     575   2,335   2,910   304     576   2,638   3,214   (1,073 )   1986   1976/86   360

Lombard

  Lombard   IL   —     392   1,566   1,958   269     239   1,988   2,227   (836 )   1982   1980   360

Niles

  Niles   IL   —     1,449   3,935   5,384   161     1,449   4,096   5,545   (524 )   2002   2002   360

Oak Forest

  Orland Park   IL   —     704   1,869   2,573   1,493     704   3,362   4,066   (1,206 )   1995   1991   360

Palatine

  Palatine   IL   2,134   413   2,213   2,626   1,146     453   3,319   3,772   (582 )   2000   2000   360

River West

  Chicago   IL   —     1,187   5,116   6,303   333     1,187   5,449   6,636   (426 )   2003   2003   360

Rolling Meadows

  Rolling Meadows   IL   —     384   1,587   1,971   550     384   2,137   2,521   (812 )   1982   1980   360

 

F-53


Table of Contents

SCHEDULE III—REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION—(Continued)

 

Property Name

  Location   State or
Country (3)
      INITIAL COST   Costs
Subsequent
to
Acquisition
    Gross Amount as of December 31, 2005             Depr.
Life
in
mos.
      Encum-
brances (2)
  Land   Building,
Equip.
& Other
  Gross
Storage
Centers
    Land and
Land Held
for Sale
  Building
Equip.
& Other
  Gross
Storage
centers
  Accum.
Depr.
    Owned
Since
  Year
Built
 

Schaumburg

  Schaumburg   IL   —     443   1,808   2,251   501     429   2,323   2,752   (887 )   1982   1980   360

Schaumburg South

  Schaumburg   IL   —     490   3,231   3,721   1,531     921   4,331   5,252   (911 )   1999   1999   360

Wheaton

  Wheaton   IL   —     247   4,190   4,437   80     221   4,296   4,517   (744 )   2002   2001   360

Willowbrook

  Willowbrook   IL   —     412   1,650   2,062   433     412   2,083   2,495   (820 )   1986   1979/82   360

Carmel

  Carmel   IN   —     404   2,560   2,964   24     404   2,584   2,988   (899 )   1996   1996   360

Castleton

  Indianapolis   IN   —     494   1,969   2,463   189     522   2,130   2,652   (609 )   1998   1988   360

College Park

  Indianapolis   IN   —     694   2,777   3,471   778     694   3,555   4,249   (1,388 )   1986   1984   360

Downtown Indy

  Indianapolis   IN   2,792   947   3,393   4,340   (17 )   1,286   3,037   4,323   (637 )   2004   2000   360

Eagle Creek

  Indianapolis   IN   —     802   2,646   3,448   76     802   2,722   3,524   (733 )   1998   1998   360

East 62nd Street

  Indianapolis   IN   —     376   1,629   2,005   —       376   1,629   2,005   (221 )   2002   1999   360

East Washington St.  

  Indianapolis   IN   2,136   399   2,583   2,982   20     412   2,590   3,002   (539 )   1999   1999   360

Fishers

  Fishers   IN   —     827   3,394   4,221   424     827   3,818   4,645   (1,089 )   1997   1987   360

Geist

  Fishers   IN   —     547   2,356   2,903   5     547   2,361   2,908   (328 )   2002   1999   360

Georgetown

  Indianapolis   IN   —     461   2,143   2,604   432     461   2,575   3,036   (804 )   1996   1996   360

Glendale

  Indianapolis   IN   —     520   2,077   2,597   210     520   2,287   2,807   (949 )   1986   1985   360

North Greenwood

  Indianapolis   IN   —     —     2,600   2,600   65     —     2,665   2,665   (684 )   1998   1998   360

Speedway—IN

  Indianapolis   IN   —     472   2,094   2,566   177     452   2,291   2,743   (291 )   2002   2002   360

Annapolis

  Annapolis   MD   —     —     3,432   3,432   90     —     3,522   3,522   (917 )   1998   1998   360

Briggs Chaney

  Silver Springs   MD   —     430   1,727   2,157   187     430   1,914   2,344   (757 )   1994   1987   360

Clinton

  Clinton   MD   —     303   1,213   1,516   2,106     650   2,972   3,622   (927 )   1986   1985   360

Crofton

  Gambrills   MD   —     376   1,516   1,892   161     376   1,677   2,053   (674 )   1988   1985   360

Frederick Road

  Frederick   MD   —     206   826   1,032   154     206   980   1,186   (409 )   1994   1987   360

Gaithersburg

  Gaithersburg   MD   —     614   2,465   3,079   1,634     614   4,099   4,713   (1,493 )   1994   1986   360

Germantown

  Germantown   MD   —     552   2,218   2,770   231     552   2,449   3,001   (942 )   1994   1988   360

Laurel

  Laurel   MD   —     391   1,570   1,961   298     391   1,868   2,259   (752 )   1988   1984   360

Oxon Hill

  FT Washington   MD   —     349   1,401   1,750   192     349   1,593   1,942   (608 )   1994   1987   360

Reisterstown

  Owing Mills   MD   —     586   1,177   1,763   176     586   1,353   1,939   (178 )   2002   1992   360

Suitland

  Suitland   MD   —     660   2,638   3,298   246     660   2,884   3,544   (1,171 )   1987   1985   360

Ann Arbor

  Ann Arbor   MI   —     424   1,695   2,119   295     424   1,990   2,414   (878 )   1988   1977   360

Auburn Hills

  Auburn Hills   MI   —     565   2,798   3,363   198     565   2,996   3,561   (475 )   2002   2001   360

Canton

  Canton   MI   —     433   1,797   2,230   447     433   2,244   2,677   (789 )   1988   1986   360

 

F-54


Table of Contents

SCHEDULE III—REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION—(Continued)

 

Property Name

  Location   State or
Country (3)
      INITIAL COST   Costs
Subsequent
to
Acquisition
    Gross Amount as of December 31, 2005             Depr.
Life
in
mos.
      Encum-
brances (2)
  Land   Building,
Equip.
& Other
  Gross
Storage
Centers
    Land and
Land Held
for Sale
  Building
Equip.
& Other
  Gross
Storage
centers
  Accum.
Depr.
    Owned
Since
  Year
Built
 

Canton South

  Canton   MI   2,591   842   2,308   3,150   803     852   3,101   3,953   (557 )   2000   2000   360

Clinton Township

  Clinton Township   MI   —     754   3,195   3,949   267     772   3,444   4,216   (794 )   1999   1999   360

Dearborn

  Dearborn   MI   —     1,773   2,694   4,467   —       1,773   2,694   4,467   (238 )   2003   2003   360

Farmington Hills (O’Brien)

  Farmington Hills   MI   —     1,361   3,597   4,958   6     1,361   3,603   4,964   (234 )   2004   2004   360

Flint South

  Flint   MI   —     615   1,738   2,353   273     615   2,011   2,626   (301 )   2001   1983   360

Fraser

  Fraser   MI   —     627   2,599   3,226   290     627   2,889   3,516   (917 )   1988   1985   360

Jackson

  Jackson   MI   —     317   1,282   1,599   (376 )   309   914   1,223   (4 )   1997   1978   360

Lansing

  Lansing   MI   —     124   500   624   (184 )   124   316   440   (2 )   1983   1978/79   360

Livonia

  Livonia   MI   —     636   2,634   3,270   532     636   3,166   3,802   (944 )   1988   1985   360

Madison Heights

  Madison Height   MI   —     487   2,099   2,586   772     487   2,871   3,358   (951 )   1995   1977   360

Mt. Clemens

  Mt. Clemens   MI   1,856   935   2,614   3,549   (130 )   935   2,484   3,419   (390 )   2001   2001   360

Plymouth

  Canton Township   MI   —     348   1,436   1,784   1,295     348   2,731   3,079   (970 )   1985   1979   360

Rochester

  Shelby Township   MI   —     610   2,445   3,055   201     610   2,646   3,256   (880 )   1996   1989   360

Rochester Hills

  Rochester Hills   MI   —     970   3,929   4,899   84     970   4,013   4,983   (613 )   2001   2001   360

Roseville

  Roseville   MI   —     931   3,295   4,226   2     931   3,297   4,228   (235 )   2003   2003   360

Southfield

  Southfield   MI   —     702   2,824   3,526   721     702   3,545   4,247   (1,326 )   1983   1976   360

Southfield at Telegraph

  Southfield   MI   —     702   2,824   3,526   2,461     1,333   4,654   5,987   (579 )   2002   2002   360

Sterling Heights

  Sterling Heights   MI   —     919   3,692   4,611   174     919   3,866   4,785   (1,283 )   1996   1986   360

Taylor

  Taylor   MI   —     632   2,094   2,726   1,586     632   3,680   4,312   (1,311 )   1995   1980   360

Troy—Maple

  Troy   MI   —     556   2,243   2,799   3,359     1,987   4,171   6,158   (1,451 )   1981   1975/77   360

Troy—Oakland Mall

  Troy   MI   —     642   2,604   3,246   762     642   3,366   4,008   (1,313 )   1983   1979   360

Walled Lake

  Walled Lake   MI   —     359   1,437   1,796   564     359   2,001   2,360   (796 )   1985   1984   360

Warren

  Warren   MI   —     683   2,831   3,514   1,376     815   4,075   4,890   (1,110 )   1988   1985   360

Westland

  Westland   MI   —     617   3,607   4,224   —       617   3,607   4,224   (363 )   2003   2003   360

Anoka

  Anoka   MN   —     368   1,714   2,082   125     368   1,839   2,207   (166 )   2003   1986   360

 

F-55


Table of Contents

SCHEDULE III—REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION—(Continued)

 

Property Name

  Location   State or
Country (3)
      INITIAL COST   Costs
Subsequent
to
Acquisition
    Gross Amount as of December 31, 2005             Depr.
Life
in
mos.
      Encum-
brances (2)
  Land   Building,
Equip.
& Other
  Gross
Storage
Centers
    Land and
Land Held
for Sale
  Building
Equip.
& Other
  Gross
Storage
centers
  Accum.
Depr.
    Owned
Since
  Year
Built
 

Apple Valley

  Apple
Valley
  MN   —     633   3,103   3,736   44     633   3,147   3,780   (272 )   2003   2001   360

Brooklyn Park

  Brooklyn
Park
  MN   —     1,226   3,195   4,421   232     1,226   3,427   4,653   (283 )   2003   1986   360

Burnsville

  Burnsville   MN   —     661   3,074   3,735   40     661   3,114   3,775   (276 )   2003   1999   360

Chanhassen

  Chanhassen   MN   —     774   4,343   5,117   79     774   4,422   5,196   (389 )   2003   1988/2000   360

Coon Rapids

  Coon
Rapids
  MN   —     971   4,161   5,132   133     971   4,294   5,265   (366 )   2003   1986/1997   360

Eden Prairie East

  Eden
Prairie
  MN   —     1,182   4,894   6,076   162     1,182   5,056   6,238   (432 )   2003   1978/1992   360

Eden Prairie West

  Eden
Prairie
  MN   —     913   5,151   6,064   189     913   5,340   6,253   (439 )   2003   1988/1997   360

Edina

  Edina   MN   —     1,316   5,627   6,943   63     1,316   5,690   7,006   (475 )   2003   1998   360

Hopkins

  Hopkins   MN   —     829   2,522   3,351   60     829   2,582   3,411   (219 )   2003   1989/1995   360

Little Canada

  Little
Canada
  MN   —     1,233   8,182   9,415   410     1,233   8,592   9,825   (708 )   2003   1982/1997   360

Maple Grove

  Maple
Grove
  MN   —     653   2,199   2,852   39     653   2,238   2,891   (194 )   2003   1996   360

Minnetonka

  Minnetonka   MN   —     631   3,089   3,720   327     631   3,416   4,047   (267 )   2003   1994   360

Plymouth 169

  Plymouth   MN   —     534   1,175   1,709   20     534   1,195   1,729   (106 )   2003   1972   360

Plymouth 494

  Plymouth   MN   —     1,364   4,025   5,389   (5 )   1,364   4,020   5,384   (344 )   2003   1978   360

Plymouth West

  Plymouth   MN   —     813   3,346   4,159   48     813   3,394   4,207   (286 )   2003   2001   360

Richfield

  Richfield   MN   —     1,298   5,458   6,756   18     1,298   5,476   6,774   (485 )   2003   1983   360

Shorewood

  Shorewood   MN   —     1,039   5,793   6,832   158     1,039   5,951   6,990   (510 )   2003   1984/1998   360

Woodbury

  Woodbury   MN   —     1,097   4,467   5,564   30     1,097   4,497   5,594   (393 )   2003   2000   360

Southhaven

  Hornlake   MS   1,761   814   1,863   2,677   1,007     835   2,849   3,684   (614 )   1998   1998/2004   360

Albermarle

  Charlotte   NC   3,308   707   3,960   4,667   149     707   4,109   4,816   (517 )   2002   1984   360

Amity Ct

  Charlotte   NC   1,842   433   2,054   2,487   57     459   2,085   2,544   (280 )   2002   1993   360

Arrowood

  Charlotte   NC   2,597   1,155   2,541   3,696   212     1,218   2,690   3,908   (363 )   2002   1992   360

Atlantic Avenue

  Raleigh   NC   —     1,424   4,058   5,482   —       1,424   4,058   5,482   (96 )   2005   1997   360

Capital Boulevard

  Raleigh   NC   —     342   1,376   1,718   1,308     339   2,687   3,026   (798 )   1994   1984   360

Cary

  Cary   NC   —     714   2,860   3,574   1,843     714   4,703   5,417   (1,224 )   1994   1984   360

Clayton

  Clayton   NC   —     764   2,344   3,108   473     807   2,774   3,581   (305 )   2002   1999   360

 

F-56


Table of Contents

SCHEDULE III—REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION—(Continued)

 

Property Name

  Location   State or
Country (3)
      INITIAL COST   Costs
Subsequent
to
Acquisition
  Gross Amount as of December 31, 2005             Depr.
Life
in
mos.
      Encum-
brances (2)
  Land   Building,
Equip.
& Other
  Gross
Storage
Centers
    Land and
Land Held
for Sale
  Building
Equip.
& Other
  Gross
Storage
centers
  Accum.
Depr.
    Owned
Since
  Year
Built
 

Concord

  Concord   NC   1,897   665   1,949   2,614   110   703   2,021   2,724   (260 )   2002   1995   360

Cone Blvd

  Greensboro   NC   1,070   599   3,024   3,623   507   651   3,479   4,130   (419 )   2002   2000   360

COTT

  Matthews   NC   857   237   1,210   1,447   49   273   1,223   1,496   (155 )   2002   1989   360

Country Club

  Winston Salem   NC   —     757   3,198   3,955   1,355   803   4,507   5,310   (411 )   2002   2000   360

Creedmoor

  Raleigh   NC   —     807   3,178   3,985   15   807   3,193   4,000   (858 )   1997   1997   360

Eastland

  Charlotte   NC   2,228   536   3,209   3,745   144   536   3,353   3,889   (416 )   2002   1983   360

English Rd

  High Point   NC   —     602   2,020   2,622   433   636   2,419   3,055   (285 )   2002   2000   360

Friendly Avenue

  Greensboro   NC   —     657   3,175   3,832   —     657   3,175   3,832   (77 )   2005   1997   360

Garner

  Garner   NC   —     204   818   1,022   188   250   960   1,210   (392 )   1994   1987   360

Gastonia

  Gastonia   NC   2,200   881   2,138   3,019   —     881   2,138   3,019   (75 )   2005   2005   360

Glenwood

  Raleigh   NC   —     266   1,066   1,332   139   266   1,205   1,471   (509 )   1994   1983   360

Glenwood Avenue

  Raleigh   NC   —     1,214   2,975   4,189   —     1,214   2,975   4,189   (71 )   2005   1997   360

Hickory

  Hickory   NC   4,317   892   2,885   3,777   3,770   1,410   6,137   7,547   (773 )   2002   1986   360

Lexington NC

  Lexington   NC   1,046   430   1,315   1,745   83   425   1,403   1,828   (188 )   2002   1987   360

Matthews

  Matthews   NC   1,733   775   4,709   5,484   26   743   4,767   5,510   (603 )   2002   1981   360

Monroe

  Monroe   NC   2,125   506   2,628   3,134   10   506   2,638   3,144   (369 )   2002   1985   360

Morrisville

  Morrisville   NC   —     409   1,640   2,049   144   409   1,784   2,193   (725 )   1994   1988   360

N. Tryon

  Charlotte   NC   1,974   873   2,175   3,048   125   873   2,300   3,173   (309 )   2002   1987   360

Park Rd

  Charlotte   NC   —     1,014   3,337   4,351   2   1,014   3,339   4,353   (428 )   2002   1998   360

Pavilion

  Charlotte   NC   1,487   1,320   1,969   3,289   61   1,298   2,052   3,350   (254 )   2002   1997   360

Pineville

  Pineville   NC   9,168   2,334   4,764   7,098   151   2,334   4,915   7,249   (652 )   2002   1983   360

Poole Road

  Raleigh   NC   —     1,123   1,266   2,389   —     1,123   1,266   2,389   (31 )   2005   1998   360

Randleman

  Greensboro   NC   1,950   1,094   2,314   3,408   9   1,094   2,323   3,417   (293 )   2002   1998   360

Rockingham

  Rockingham   NC   774   157   1,564   1,721   20   157   1,584   1,741   (209 )   2002   1996   360

Salisbury

  Salisbury   NC   3,188   155   4,617   4,772   97   155   4,714   4,869   (579 )   2002   1986   360

Silas Creek

  Winston Salem   NC   —     1,640   2,311   3,951   1,035   1,691   3,295   4,986   (381 )   2002   2000   360

South Boulevard

  Charlotte   NC   4,794   2,180   3,926   6,106   36   2,180   3,962   6,142   (221 )   2004   1996   360

South Raleigh

  Raleigh   NC   —     792   610   1,402   —     792   610   1,402   (15 )   2005   1997   360

Stallings

  Matthews   NC   2,068   747   1,689   2,436   535   786   2,185   2,971   (317 )   2002   1995   360

Wake Forest

  Wake Forest   NC   713   851   1,484   2,335   500   901   1,934   2,835   (237 )   2002   1998   360

Weddington

  Waxhaw   NC   2,386   642   2,345   2,987   71   706   2,352   3,058   (293 )   2002   1999   360

Wendover

  Charlotte   NC   —     1,736   6,402   8,138   —     1,736   6,402   8,138   (151 )   2005   2003   360

 

F-57


Table of Contents

SCHEDULE III—REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION—(Continued)

 

Property Name

  Location   State or
Country (3)
      INITIAL COST   Costs
Subsequent
to
Acquisition
    Gross Amount as of December 31, 2005             Depr.
Life
in
mos.
      Encum-
brances (2)
  Land   Building,
Equip.
& Other
  Gross
Storage
Centers
    Land and
Land Held
for Sale
  Building
Equip.
& Other
  Gross
Storage
centers
  Accum.
Depr.
    Owned
Since
  Year
Built
 

Wilkinson

  Charlotte   NC   1,968   548   2,777   3,325   115     548   2,892   3,440   (363 )   2002   1986   360

Winston

  Winston Salem   NC   1,171   354   1,441   1,795   252     328   1,719   2,047   (232 )   2002   1985   360

Bricktown

  Bricktown   NJ   3,699   1,398   2,640   4,038   2,423     1,957   4,504   6,461   (749 )   2004   2000   360

Marlboro

  Morganville   NJ   —     1,320   4,963   6,283   75     1,320   5,038   6,358   (814 )   2001   2001   360

Marlton

  Marlton   NJ   —     842   4,643   5,485   77     842   4,720   5,562   (421 )   2003   2003   360

Old Bridge

  Matawan   NJ   —     767   2,301   3,068   2,185     767   4,486   5,253   (1,479 )   1987   1987/2000   360

Rockaway (dover)

  Dover   NJ   —     2,038   3,983   6,021   38     2,038   4,021   6,059   (421 )   2003   2003   360

Voorhees

  Voorhees   NJ   —     1,121   4,268   5,389   (60 )   1,121   4,208   5,329   (674 )   2001   2001   360

West Paterson

  West Paterson   NJ   —     1,944   6,367   8,311   66     1,944   6,433   8,377   (399 )   2004   2004   360

Bethpage

  Bethpage   NY   6,475   2,370   6,209   8,579   2,674     3,417   7,836   11,253   (1,211 )   2004   2000   360

Commack

  Commack   NY   6,140   3,461   6,203   9,664   212     3,461   6,415   9,876   (1,430 )   1999   1999   360

Gold Street

  Brooklyn   NY   —     1,194   4,821   6,015   1,622     1,194   6,443   7,637   (2,590 )   1986   1940   360

Great Neck

  Great Neck   NY   2,047   436   2,632   3,068   320     438   2,950   3,388   (569 )   1999   1929/2000   360

Hempstead

  Hempstead   NY   4,420   1,902   4,572   6,474   1,450     2,599   5,325   7,924   (969 )   2004   2000   360

Melville

  Melville   NY   —     1,099   3,897   4,996   3,739     1,099   7,636   8,735   (1,595 )   1998   1998   360

Nesconset

  Nesconset   NY   3,048   1,072   2,919   3,991   665     1,074   3,582   4,656   (678 )   2000   2000   360

Northern Boulevard

  Long Island   NY   —     1,244   5,039   6,283   1,119     1,244   6,158   7,402   (2,561 )   1987   1940   360

Utica Avenue

  Brooklyn   NY   —     830   3,556   4,386   653     830   4,209   5,039   (1,728 )   1986   1964   360

Van Dam Street

  Long Island   NY   —     760   3,189   3,949   540     760   3,729   4,489   (1,621 )   1986   1925   360

Yonkers

  Yonkers   NY   —     913   3,936   4,849   739     913   4,675   5,588   (2,008 )   1986   1928   360

16th & Sandy

  Portland   OR   —     231   938   1,169   1,521     492   2,198   2,690   (700 )   1995   1973   360

Allen Boulevard

  Beaverton   OR   —     525   2,101   2,626   121     525   2,222   2,747   (734 )   1996   1973   360

Barbur Boulevard

  Portland   OR   —     337   3,411   3,748   2,612     790   5,570   6,360   (2,157 )   1995   1993   360

Beaverton

  Beaverton   OR   —     216   4,201   4,417   —       216   4,201   4,417   (161 )   1985   2005   360

Denney Road

  Beaverton   OR   —     593   2,380   2,973   271     593   2,651   3,244   (1,070 )   1989   1988   360

Division

  Portland   OR   —     352   1,395   1,747   2,708     809   3,646   4,455   (1,320 )   1996   1992   360

Gresham

  Gresham   OR   —     744   2,442   3,186   122     744   2,564   3,308   (864 )   1996   1996   360

Hillsboro

  Hillsboro   OR   —     720   2,992   3,712   185     720   3,177   3,897   (1,047 )   1996   1996   360

 

F-58


Table of Contents

SCHEDULE III—REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION—(Continued)

 

Property Name

  Location   State or
Country (3)
      INITIAL COST   Costs
Subsequent
to
Acquisition
  Gross Amount as of December 31, 2005             Depr.
Life
in
mos.
      Encum-
brances (2)
  Land   Building,
Equip.
& Other
  Gross
Storage
Centers
    Land and
Land Held
for Sale
  Building
Equip.
& Other
  Gross
Storage
centers
  Accum.
Depr.
    Owned
Since
  Year
Built
 

King City / Tigard

  Tigard   OR   —     511   2,051   2,562   228   511   2,279   2,790   (929 )   1987   1986   360

Liberty Road

  Salem   OR   —     524   1,280   1,804   3,971   889   4,886   5,775   (1,245 )   1995   1993   360

Milwaukie

  Milwaukie   OR   —     583   2,005   2,588   3,290   1,161   4,717   5,878   (1,687 )   1996   1990   360

Oregon City

  Oregon City   OR   —     321   1,613   1,934   2,088   715   3,307   4,022   (1,334 )   1995   1992   360

Portland

  Portland   OR   —     382   1,530   1,912   160   382   1,690   2,072   (694 )   1988   1988   360

Salem

  Salem   OR   —     574   2,294   2,868   519   574   2,813   3,387   (1,172 )   1983   1979/81   360

Airport

  Philadelphia   PA   —     799   3,194   3,993   731   799   3,925   4,724   (1,509 )   1986   1985   360

Edgemont

  Newton Square   PA   —     497   3,070   3,567   2,761   949   5,379   6,328   (2,075 )   1995   1992   360

Jenkintown

  Jenkintown   PA   —     1   2,247   2,248   115   —     2,363   2,363   (128 )   2004   2004   360

Oxford Valley

  Fairless Hills   PA   —     1,197   4,174   5,371   84   1,197   4,258   5,455   (558 )   2002   2002   360

Painters Crossing

  Glen Mills   PA   —     513   2,868   3,381   9   511   2,879   3,390   (765 )   1998   1998   360

Valley Forge

  Berwyn   PA   —     331   2,816   3,147   594   —     3,741   3,741   (416 )   2002   2002   360

Westchester

  West Chester   PA   —     —     4,197   4,197   578   —     4,775   4,775   (1,931 )   1986   1980   360

Ashley River

  Charleston   SC   —     851   3,880   4,731   5   910   3,826   4,736   (483 )   2002   1999   360

Ballantyne

  Fort Mill   SC   —     640   1,976   2,616   638   681   2,573   3,254   (286 )   2002   1998   360

Charleston

  Ladson   SC   1,892   403   3,063   3,466   505   467   3,504   3,971   (427 )   2002   1999   360

Dave Lyle

  Rock Hill   SC   —     487   2,483   2,970   417   533   2,854   3,387   (341 )   2002   2000   360

Florence

  Florence   SC   2,653   584   3,841   4,425   213   584   4,054   4,638   (483 )   2002   1985   360

Garners Ferry

  Columbia   SC   2,338   1,026   2,361   3,387   44   1,026   2,405   3,431   (309 )   2002   1988   360

Greenville

  Greenville   SC   1,794   330   1,557   1,887   33   330   1,590   1,920   (235 )   2002   1987   360

James Island (Folly Road)

  Charleston   SC   —     605   2,372   2,977   —     605   2,372   2,977   (190 )   2003   2003   360

Rock Hill

  Rock Hill   SC   2,181   415   1,867   2,282   381   451   2,212   2,663   (284 )   2002   1998   360

Rosewood (Morningstar)

  Columbia   SC   —     363   3,549   3,912   11   363   3,560   3,923   (256 )   2002   2004   360

Shriners

  Greenville   SC   1,968   431   2,324   2,755   73   460   2,368   2,828   (314 )   2002   1998   360

Spartanburg

  Spartanburg   SC   472   212   1,065   1,277   102   212   1,167   1,379   (156 )   2002   1986   360

Sumter

  Sumter   SC   1,142   268   1,657   1,925   72   253   1,744   1,997   (225 )   2002   1986   360

Sunset

  Lexington   SC   —     535   2,299   2,834   443   400   2,877   3,277   (331 )   2002   1999   360

Woodruff

  Greenville   SC   1,866   1,082   1,390   2,472   208   1,078   1,602   2,680   (216 )   2002   1996   360

Franklin

  Franklin   TN   2,245   569   2,057   2,626   140   584   2,182   2,766   (796 )   1995   1995   360

Hermitage

  Hermitage   TN   2,259   157   2,445   2,602   597   327   2,872   3,199   (1,325 )   1995   1995   360

 

F-59


Table of Contents

SCHEDULE III—REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION—(Continued)

 

Property Name

  Location   State or
Country (3)
      INITIAL COST   Costs
Subsequent
to
Acquisition
    Gross Amount as of December 31, 2005             Depr.
Life
in
mos.
      Encum-
brances (2)
  Land   Building,
Equip.
& Other
  Gross
Storage
Centers
    Land and
Land Held
for Sale
  Building
Equip.
& Other
  Gross
Storage
centers
  Accum.
Depr.
    Owned
Since
  Year
Built
 

Hickory Hollow

  Antioch   TN   1,686   743   2,337   3,080   318     758   2,640   3,398   (777 )   1997   1997   360

Medical Center—TN

  Nashville   TN   1,738   236   2,251   2,487   126     246   2,367   2,613   (909 )   1995   1995   360

Rivergate

  Madison   TN   2,913   760   1,958   2,718   870     776   2,812   3,588   (854 )   1996   1996   360

South Main

  Memphis   TN   585   465   1,480   1,945   (329 )   352   1,264   1,616   (312 )   2000   2000   360

Stones River

  Murfreesboro   TN   2,175   373   1,879   2,252   584     399   2,437   2,836   (661 )   1998   1998   360

Sycamore View

  Memphis   TN   1,161   340   1,460   1,800   1,360     364   2,796   3,160   (716 )   1998   1998   360

Winchester

  Memphis   TN   1,897   620   2,655   3,275   277     642   2,910   3,552   (807 )   1998   1998   360

Wolfchase

  Memphis   TN   1,564   760   1,881   2,641   630     781   2,490   3,271   (760 )   1997   1997   360

Audelia II

  Richardson   TX   —     689   2,286   2,975   (5 )   689   2,281   2,970   (339 )   2002   2002   360

Bandera Road

  San Antonio   TX   —     468   1,873   2,341   155     468   2,028   2,496   (867 )   1988   1981   360

Bedford

  Bedford   TX   —     408   1,678   2,086   174     408   1,852   2,260   (800 )   1985   1984   360

Bee Caves Road

  Austin   TX   —     608   3,609   4,217   1,305     1,207   4,315   5,522   (944 )   1999   1999   360

Beltline

  Irving   TX   —     414   1,671   2,085   476     414   2,147   2,561   (953 )   1989   1985/86   360

Blanco Road

  San Antonio   TX   —     801   3,235   4,036   160     801   3,395   4,196   (1,436 )   1988   1989/91   360

Champions

  Houston   TX   —     515   2,775   3,290   261     484   3,067   3,551   (782 )   1998   1998   360

Cinco Ranch

  Katy   TX   —     1,751   1,336   3,087   108     523   2,672   3,195   (630 )   1999   1998   360

City Place

  Dallas   TX   —     1,045   3,314   4,359   464     1,118   3,705   4,823   (846 )   1999   1999   360

East Lamar

  Arlington   TX   —     742   1,863   2,605   592     742   2,455   3,197   (767 )   1996   1996   360

Federal Road

  Houston   TX   —     552   2,223   2,775   208     552   2,431   2,983   (1,039 )   1988   1988   360

First Colony

  Missouri City   TX   —     447   2,175   2,622   36     427   2,231   2,658   (431 )   2000   1994   360

Forum 303

  Arlington   TX   —     273   1,100   1,373   182     273   1,282   1,555   (565 )   1986   1984   360

Fredericksburg Road

  San Antonio   TX   —     645   2,596   3,241   439     645   3,035   3,680   (1,254 )   1987   1978/82   360

Greenville Avenue

  Dallas   TX   —     768   3,104   3,872   817     1,375   3,314   4,689   (922 )   1998   1998   360

Helotes

  Helotes   TX   1,816   481   2,277   2,758   41     493   2,306   2,799   (453 )   2000   2000   360

Henderson Pass

  San Antonio   TX   —     562   2,348   2,910   933     1,386   2,457   3,843   (670 )   1998   1995   360

Henderson Street

  Fort Worth   TX   —     318   3,137   3,455   966     338   4,083   4,421   (884 )   1999   1999   360

Highway 26

  Hurst   TX   —     517   2,761   3,278   (1 )   527   2,750   3,277   (468 )   2001   2001   360

Highway 78

  San Antonio   TX   —     392   1,550   1,942   229     392   1,779   2,171   (480 )   1998   1997   360

Hill Country Village

  San Antonio   TX   —     679   2,731   3,410   200     679   2,931   3,610   (1,237 )   1985   1982   360

 

F-60


Table of Contents

SCHEDULE III—REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION—(Continued)

 

Property Name

  Location   State or
Country (3)
      INITIAL COST   Costs
Subsequent
to
Acquisition
    Gross Amount as of December 31, 2005             Depr.
Life
in
mos.
      Encum-
brances (2)
  Land   Building,
Equip.
& Other
  Gross
Storage
Centers
    Land and
Land Held
for Sale
  Building
Equip.
& Other
  Gross
Storage
centers
  Accum.
Depr.
    Owned
Since
  Year
Built
 

Hillcroft

  Houston   TX   —     —     3,645   3,645   101     —     3,746   3,746   (1,548 )   1991   1988   360

Hurst

  Hurst   TX   —     363   1,492   1,855   154     363   1,646   2,009   (677 )   1987   1974   360

Imperial Valley

  Houston   TX   —     461   1,856   2,317   224     461   2,080   2,541   (887 )   1988   1987   360

Irving

  Irving   TX   —     180   734   914   813     314   1,413   1,727   (592 )   1985   1975/84   360

Kingwood

  Kingwood   TX   —     525   2,097   2,622   813     511   2,924   3,435   (1,128 )   1988   1988   360

Lakeline

  Austin   TX   —     737   3,412   4,149   (24 )   748   3,377   4,125   (596 )   2001   2001   360

Las Colinas

  Irving   TX   2,326   478   2,717   3,195   461     491   3,165   3,656   (591 )   2000   2000   360

Lewisville

  Lewisville   TX   —     434   2,521   2,955   31     434   2,552   2,986   (810 )   1997   1997   360

MacArthur

  Irving   TX   —     180   734   914   1,241     359   1,796   2,155   (838 )   1985   1975/84   360

Macarthur Crossing

  Irving   TX   —     746   2,577   3,323   404     746   2,981   3,727   (1,023 )   1996   1996   360

Medical Center (TX)

  Houston   TX   —     737   2,950   3,687   336     737   3,286   4,023   (1,500 )   1989   1989   360

Medical Center SA

  San
Antonio
  TX   2,165   660   2,683   3,343   149     667   2,825   3,492   (544 )   2000   2000   360

Mission Bend

  Houston   TX   —     653   2,218   2,871   560     653   2,778   3,431   (937 )   1995   1995   360

Nacogdoches

  San
Antonio
  TX   —     363   1,565   1,928   1,561     381   3,108   3,489   (773 )   1998   1996   360

North Austin

  Austin   TX   —     609   1,331   1,940   25     609   1,356   1,965   (62 )   1986   2004   360

North Carrollton

  Carrollton   TX   —     627   2,739   3,366   38     627   2,777   3,404   (575 )   2000   1999   360

North Park

  Kingwood   TX   —     570   2,163   2,733   79     549   2,263   2,812   (432 )   2000   1996   360

Oak Farms

  Houston   TX   —     2,603   2,730   5,333   986     2,652   3,667   6,319   (827 )   1999   1999   360

Oak Hills

  Austin   TX   2,491   149   3,568   3,717   21     —     3,738   3,738   (840 )   1999   1999   360

Oltorf

  Austin   TX   —     609   4,399   5,008   2     609   4,401   5,010   (593 )   2002   2002   360

Olympia

  Missouri
City
  TX   2,247   489   2,912   3,401   24     505   2,920   3,425   (550 )   2000   2000   360

Park Cities East

  Dallas   TX   —     1,017   2,686   3,703   329     1,017   3,015   4,032   (1,054 )   1995   1995   360

Parker Road

  Plano   TX   —     809   2,133   2,942   49     809   2,182   2,991   (765 )   1995   1995   360

Preston Road

  Dallas   TX   —     703   2,702   3,405   118     697   2,826   3,523   (888 )   1997   1997   360

River Oaks

  Houston   TX   —     987   2,565   3,552   5,018     1,738   6,832   8,570   (2,657 )   1996   1989   360

Round Rock

  Round
Rock
  TX   —     386   1,641   2,027   162     386   1,803   2,189   (589 )   1997   1995   360

San Antonio NE

  San
Antonio
  TX   —     406   1,630   2,036   159     406   1,789   2,195   (758 )   1985   1982   360

 

F-61


Table of Contents

SCHEDULE III—REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION—(Continued)

 

Property Name

  Location   State or
Country (3)
      INITIAL COST   Costs
Subsequent
to
Acquisition
    Gross Amount as of December 31, 2005             Depr.
Life
in
mos.
      Encum-
brances (2)
  Land   Building,
Equip.
& Other
  Gross
Storage
Centers
    Land and
Land Held
for Sale
  Building
Equip.
& Other
  Gross
Storage
centers
  Accum.
Depr.
    Owned
Since
  Year
Built
 

Shavano Park

  San Antonio   TX   —     566   2,887   3,453   (6 )   565   2,882   3,447   (440 )   2001   2001   360

Slaughter Lane

  Austin   TX   —     592   2,428   3,020   340     592   2,768   3,360   (866 )   1997   1994   360

South Cooper

  Arlington   TX   —     632   2,305   2,937   335     632   2,640   3,272   (867 )   1996   1996   360

South Main—TX

  Houston   TX   —     404   1,039   1,443   184     392   1,235   1,627   (284 )   2000   1999   360

Southlake

  Southlake   TX   —     670   2,738   3,408   429     670   3,167   3,837   (801 )   1998   1998   360

Sugarland

  Sugarland   TX   —     761   2,991   3,752   191     761   3,182   3,943   (1,309 )   1988   1987   360

T.C. Jester

  Houston   TX   —     903   3,613   4,516   491     903   4,104   5,007   (1,304 )   1996   1990   360

The Quarry

  San Antonio   TX   —     1,316   2,817   4,133   164     488   3,809   4,297   (919 )   1999   1999   360

Thousand Oaks

  San Antonio   TX   —     421   1,683   2,104   158     421   1,841   2,262   (771 )   1986   1987   360

Universal City

  Universal City   TX   —     169   593   762   1,098     169   1,691   1,860   (690 )   1995   1985   360

Valley Ranch

  Coppell   TX   —     791   3,210   4,001   240     791   3,450   4,241   (1,064 )   1997   1995   360

West University

  Houston   TX   —     1,121   4,484   5,605   205     1,121   4,689   5,810   (1,942 )   1989   1988   360

Westchase

  Houston   TX   —     250   2,756   3,006   16     351   2,671   3,022   (520 )   2000   1998   360

Westheimer

  Houston   TX   —     611   2,470   3,081   92     611   2,562   3,173   (1,040 )   1986   1977   360

Windcrest

  San Antonio   TX   —     626   2,535   3,161   510     626   3,045   3,671   (995 )   1996   1975   360

Woodforest

  Houston   TX   —     538   1,870   2,408   438     538   2,308   2,846   (732 )   1996   1996   360

Woodlands

  Spring   TX   —     737   2,948   3,685   405     737   3,353   4,090   (1,374 )   1988   1988   360

Bayside

  Virginia Beach   VA   —     236   943   1,179   358     236   1,301   1,537   (500 )   1988   1984   360

Burke

  Fairfax   VA   —     634   2,539   3,173   233     634   2,772   3,406   (878 )   1996   1984   360

Burke Centre

  Burke   VA   —     1,035   4,778   5,813   274     1,035   5,052   6,087   (700 )   2001   1983   360

Cedar Road

  Chesapeake   VA   —     295   1,184   1,479   268     295   1,452   1,747   (547 )   1994   1989   360

Charlottesville

  Charlottesville   VA   —     305   1,225   1,530   150     305   1,375   1,680   (583 )   1994   1984   360

Chesapeake

  Chesapeake   VA   —     454   1,821   2,275   110     454   1,931   2,385   (639 )   1996   1986   360

Crater Road

  Petersburg   VA   —     224   898   1,122   120     224   1,018   1,242   (416 )   1994   1987   360

Dale City

  Dale City   VA   —     346   1,388   1,734   514     346   1,902   2,248   (711 )   1994   1986   360

Fairfax

  Fairfax   VA   —     1,136   4,555   5,691   2,542     1,414   6,819   8,233   (2,636 )   1986   1980   360

Falls Church

  Falls Church   VA   —     1,413   5,661   7,074   1,685     1,413   7,346   8,759   (2,477 )   1987   1988   360

Fordson

  Alexandria   VA   —     324   3,114   3,438   95     324   3,209   3,533   (452 )   2002   1984   360

Fullerton

  Springfield   VA   —     1,139   4,346   5,485   128     1,139   4,474   5,613   (657 )   2001   1983   360

Gainesville

  Gainesville   VA   —     245   983   1,228   196     245   1,179   1,424   (489 )   1994   1988   360

Herndon

  Herndon   VA   —     582   2,334   2,916   576     582   2,910   3,492   (1,142 )   1988   1985   360

Holland Road

  Virginia Beach   VA   —     204   818   1,022   207     204   1,025   1,229   (443 )   1994   1985   360

 

F-62


Table of Contents

SCHEDULE III—REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION—(Continued)

 

Property Name

  Location   State or
Country (3)
      INITIAL COST   Costs
Subsequent
to
Acquisition
  Gross Amount as of December 31, 2005             Depr.
Life
in
mos.
      Encum-
brances (2)
  Land   Building,
Equip.
& Other
  Gross
Storage
Centers
    Land and
Land Held
for Sale
  Building
Equip.
& Other
  Gross
Storage
centers
  Accum.
Depr.
    Owned
Since
  Year
Built
 

Jefferson Davis Hwy

  Richmond   VA   —     306   1,226   1,532   127   306   1,353   1,659   (552 )   1994   1990   360

Kempsville

  Virginia Beach   VA   —     279   1,116   1,395   170   279   1,286   1,565   (512 )   1989   1985   360

Laskin Road

  Virginia Beach   VA   —     305   1,225   1,530   181   305   1,406   1,711   (588 )   1994   1984   360

Leesburg

  Leesburg   VA   —     541   2,174   2,715   97   541   2,271   2,812   (742 )   1996   1986   360

Manassas East

  Manassas   VA   —     339   1,406   1,745   28   339   1,434   1,773   (596 )   2004   N/A   360

Manassas West/East

  Manassas   VA   —     315   1,221   1,536   738   315   1,959   2,274   (767 )   1988   1984   360

McLean

  McLean   VA   —     —     1,839   1,839   1,799   —     3,638   3,638   (1,599 )   1997   1997   225

Merrifield

  Fairfax   VA   —     3,184   3,966   7,150   918   3,192   4,876   8,068   (1,006 )   1999   1999   360

Midlothian Turnpike

  Richmond   VA   —     646   2,591   3,237   85   582   2,740   3,322   (902 )   1996   1984   360

Newport News North

  Newport News   VA   —     574   2,301   2,875   393   574   2,694   3,268   (857 )   1996   1986   360

Newport News South

  Newport News   VA   —     496   2,014   2,510   383   496   2,397   2,893   (969 )   1985   1985   360

North Richmond

  Richmond   VA   —     344   1,375   1,719   220   344   1,595   1,939   (670 )   1988   1984   360

Old Towne

  Alexandria   VA   5,500   2,036   7,210   9,246   173   2,036   7,383   9,419   (1,548 )   1999   1999   360

Potomac Mills

  Woodbridge   VA   —     1,114   3,440   4,554   32   1,122   3,464   4,586   (932 )   1997   1997   360

Princess Anne Road

  Virginia Beach   VA   —     305   1,225   1,530   128   305   1,353   1,658   (539 )   1994   1985   360

South Military Highway

  Virginia Beach   VA   —     289   1,161   1,450   363   289   1,524   1,813   (512 )   1996   1984   360

Sterling (Cascades)

  Sterling   VA   —     2,292   3,639   5,931   64   2,292   3,703   5,995   (937 )   1998   1998   360

Telegraph

  Lorton   VA   —     441   2,036   2,477   302   441   2,338   2,779   (319 )   2001   2001   360

Temple

  Prince George   VA   —     297   1,193   1,490   213   297   1,406   1,703   (562 )   1994   1989   360

Virginia Beach Blvd.

  Virginia Beach   VA   —     502   1,832   2,334   513   502   2,345   2,847   (963 )   1989   1985   360

Auburn

  Auburn   WA   —     760   2,773   3,533   214   760   2,987   3,747   (1,042 )   1996   1996   360

Ballinger Way

  Shoreline   WA   —     893   3,545   4,438   55   893   3,600   4,493   (226 )   2004   2004   360

Bellefield

  Bellevue   WA   —     957   3,830   4,787   288   957   4,118   5,075   (1,367 )   1996   1978   360

Bellevue

  Bellevue   WA   —     1,860   7,483   9,343   5,196   2,320   12,219   14,539   (4,159 )   1984   1975/99   360

Bellingham

  Bellingham   WA   —     601   2,400   3,001   415   601   2,815   3,416   (1,121 )   1981   1981   360

 

F-63


Table of Contents

SCHEDULE III—REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION—(Continued)

 

Property Name

  Location   State or
Country (3)
      INITIAL COST   Costs
Subsequent
to
Acquisition
  Gross Amount as of December 31, 2005             Depr.
Life
in
mos.
      Encum-
brances (2)
  Land   Building,
Equip.
& Other
  Gross
Storage
Centers
    Land and
Land Held
for Sale
  Building
Equip.
& Other
  Gross
Storage
centers
  Accum.
Depr.
    Owned
Since
  Year
Built
 

Bremerton

  Bremerton   WA   —     563   2,297   2,860   135   563   2,432   2,995   (716 )   1997   1976   360

Burien

  Burien   WA   —     646   2,622   3,268   565   646   3,187   3,833   (1,296 )   1985   1974   360

Burien II

  Seatac   WA   —     388   1,553   1,941   313   388   1,866   2,254   (788 )   1985   1979   360

Canyon Park

  Bothell   WA   —     1,023   2,949   3,972   332   1,023   3,281   4,304   (1,534 )   1996   1990   360

Canyon Road Puyallup

  Puyallup   WA   —     234   937   1,171   168   234   1,105   1,339   (379 )   1996   1986   360

Capitol Hill

  Seattle   WA   —     764   4,516   5,280   990   839   5,431   6,270   (3,164 )   1987   1988   360

East Bremerton

  Bremerton   WA   —     576   2,312   2,888   262   576   2,574   3,150   (854 )   1996   1985   360

East Lynnwood

  Lynnwood   WA   —     482   1,933   2,415   534   482   2,467   2,949   (955 )   1986   1978   360

Edmonds

  Edmonds   WA   —     1,190   4,806   5,996   670   1,190   5,476   6,666   (2,133 )   1984   1974/75   360

Everett

  Everett   WA   —     512   2,045   2,557   772   512   2,817   3,329   (1,107 )   1981   1978   360

Factoria

  Bellevue   WA   —     590   2,362   2,952   241   580   2,613   3,193   (1,010 )   1984   1984   360

Factoria Square

  Bellevue   WA   —     1,226   4,909   6,135   203   1,226   5,112   6,338   (1,635 )   1996   1989   360

Federal Way

  Federal
Way
  WA   —     862   3,414   4,276   301   872   3,705   4,577   (1,611 )   1984   1975   360

Gig Harbor

  Gig
Harbor
  WA   —     1,119   769   1,888   126   1,059   955   2,014   (248 )   1999   1980   360

Hazel Dell

  Vancover   WA   —     728   1,506   2,234   2,928   1,279   3,883   5,162   (1,350 )   1996   1989   360

Highland Hills

  Tacoma   WA   —     592   2,362   2,954   290   592   2,652   3,244   (1,085 )   1981   1982   360

Issaquah

  Issaquah   WA   —     615   2,460   3,075   248   615   2,708   3,323   (1,159 )   1985   1986   360

Juanita

  Kirkland   WA   3,472   877   4,469   5,346   30   877   4,499   5,376   (866 )   2000   2000   360

Kennydale

  Renton   WA   —     816   3,267   4,083   233   816   3,500   4,316   (1,095 )   1996   1991   360

Kent

  Kent   WA   —     557   2,297   2,854   52   543   2,363   2,906   (701 )   1997   1977   360

Lacey

  Lacey   WA   —     251   1,014   1,265   105   185   1,185   1,370   (362 )   1997   1977   360

Lake City

  Seattle   WA   —     572   2,421   2,993   340   572   2,761   3,333   (1,212 )   1995   1987   360

Lake Union

  Seattle   WA   —     1,580   7,440   9,020   62   2,956   6,126   9,082   (2,614 )   1998   1998   360

Lakewood 512

  Lakewood   WA   —     920   3,676   4,596   737   920   4,413   5,333   (1,602 )   1987   1979/81   360

Lynnwood

  Lynnwood   WA   —     775   3,186   3,961   143   757   3,347   4,104   (980 )   1997   1979   360

Mill Creek

  Everett   WA   —     627   3,760   4,387   315   627   4,075   4,702   (975 )   1998   1998   360

Parkland

  Tacoma   WA   —     400   1,634   2,034   138   391   1,781   2,172   (531 )   1997   1980   360

Pier 57

  Seattle   WA   —     872   4,558   5,430   131   872   4,689   5,561   (1,141 )   1986   1912/98   360

Port Orchard

  Port
Orchard
  WA   —     483   2,013   2,496   151   483   2,164   2,647   (690 )   1997   1991   360

Queen Anne/Magnolia

  Seattle   WA   —     952   3,777   4,729   305   952   4,082   5,034   (1,705 )   1987   1988   360

Redmond

  Redmond   WA   —     537   5,503   6,040   52   529   5,563   6,092   (1,380 )   1998   1998   360

 

F-64


Table of Contents

SCHEDULE III—REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION—(Continued)

 

Property Name

  Location   State or
Country (3)
      INITIAL COST   Costs
Subsequent
to
Acquisition
    Gross Amount as of December 31, 2005             Depr.
Life
in
mos.
      Encum-
brances (2)
  Land   Building,
Equip. &
Other
  Gross
Storage
Centers
    Land and
Land Held
for Sale
  Building
Equip.
& Other
  Gross
Storage
centers
  Accum.
Depr.
    Owned
Since
  Year
Built
 

Renton

  Renton   WA   —     625   2,557   3,182   308     625   2,865   3,490   (1,211 )   1984   1979/89   360

Salmon Creek

  Vancouver   WA   —     759   3,327   4,086   153     759   3,480   4,239   (1,048 )   1997   1997   360

Sammamish Plateau

  Sammamish   WA   —     963   3,854   4,817   71     963   3,925   4,888   (982 )   1998   1998   360

Shoreline

  Shoreline   WA   —     770   3,446   4,216   734     770   4,180   4,950   (1,643 )   1986   1978   360

Smokey Point (1)(5)

  Arlington   WA   —     232   929   1,161   (280 )   881   —     881   —       1987   1984/87   360

South Hill

  Puyallup   WA   —     300   1,247   1,547   209     300   1,456   1,756   (591 )   1995   1980   360

Southcenter

  Renton   WA   —     425   1,783   2,208   241     425   2,024   2,449   (881 )   1985   1979   360

Sprague

  Tacoma   WA   —     717   1,431   2,148   2,937     1,241   3,844   5,085   (1,435 )   1996   1950/89   360

Tacoma South (1)(5)

  Tacoma   WA   —     315   1,263   1,578   (284 )   1,294   —     1,294   —       1987   1975   360

Totem Lake

  Kirkland   WA   —     660   2,668   3,328   321     660   2,989   3,649   (1,233 )   1984   1978   360

Vancouver Mall

  Vancouver   WA   —     364   1,457   1,821   326     364   1,783   2,147   (770 )   1980   1982   360

W. Olympia

  Olympia   WA   —     359   1,446   1,805   131     351   1,585   1,936   (456 )   1997   1978   360

West Seattle

  Seattle   WA   —     698   4,202   4,900   66     698   4,268   4,966   (1,298 )   1997   1997   360

White Center (aka West Seattle)

  Seattle   WA   —     559   2,284   2,843   199     559   2,483   3,042   (1,014 )   1980   1981   360

Woodinville

  Woodinville   WA   —     674   2,693   3,367   454     674   3,147   3,821   (1,203 )   1984   1982/84   360

Corporate Office

  Seattle   WA   —     3,947   7,096   11,043   19,204     4,070   26,178   30,248   (18,669 )   1998   1998   360

Monocacy (Land with no Building)

  Frederick   MD   —     1,288   —     1,288   —       1,288   —     1,288   —       2002   N/A   N/A

Olive Interbelt (Non-Shurgard Store)

  St. Louis   MO   —     818   3,705   4,523   116     818   3,821   4,639   (1,527 )   1994   1994   360

Dolfield (1)

  Baltimore   MD   —     —     —     —     565     565   —     565   —       2003   N/A   N/A

Fontana-Sierra (1)

  Fontana   CA   —     391   1,572   1,963   (1,635 )   328   —     328   —       1987   1980/85   N/A

St. Peters (Land with no Building)

  St. Peters   MO   —     1,012   —     1,012   25     1,037   —     1,037   —       1999   N/A   N/A
                                                 

Domestic total

      248,741   376,524   1,421,816   1,798,340   259,428     398,314   1,659,455   2,057,769   (432,937 )      
                                                 

 

F-65


Table of Contents

SCHEDULE III—REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION—(Continued)

 

Property Name

  Location   State or
Country (3)
      INITIAL COST   Costs
Subsequent
to
Acquisition
    Gross Amount as of December 31, 2005             Depr.
Life
in
mos.
      Encum-
brances (2)
  Land   Building,
Equip.
& Other
  Gross
Storage
Centers
    Land and
Land Held
for Sale
  Building
Equip.
& Other
  Gross
Storage
centers
  Accum.
Depr.
    Owned
Since
  Year
Built
 

Aartselaar

  Antwerpen   Belgium   $ 3,345   $ 1,030   $ 6,038   $ 7,068   $ 674     $ 1,397   $ 6,345   $ 7,742   $ (1,402 )   2004   1997   360

Antwerpen Bredabaan

  Antwerpen   Belgium     3,045     1,753     4,683     6,436     423       2,003     4,856     6,859     (672 )   2004   2000   360

Borgerhout

  Antwerpen   Belgium     2,685     395     4,842     5,237     252       685     4,804     5,489     (523 )   2004   2002   360

Brugge

  Brugge   Belgium     2,269     1,023     3,784     4,807     68       1,023     3,852     4,875     (619 )   2004   1999   360

Forest

  Brussels   Belgium     4,306     —       5,336     5,336     858       408     5,786     6,194     (1,469 )   2004   1995   360

Ghent

  Ghent   Belgium     3,841     1,283     6,730     8,013     328       1,288     7,053     8,341     (2,226 )   2004   1998   360

Groot-Bijgaarden

  Brussels   Belgium     3,118     1,959     3,799     5,758     (1 )     1,959     3,798     5,757     —       2005   2005   360

Jette

  Brussels   Belgium     4,249     1,190     7,802     8,992     543       1,406     8,129     9,535     (1,367 )   2004   2000   360

Kortrijk

  Kortrijk   Belgium     2,685     1,418     4,491     5,909     651       1,946     4,614     6,560     (643 )   2004   1999   360

Leuven

  Leuven   Belgium     3,248     1,843     5,024     6,867     69       1,843     5,093     6,936     (876 )   2004   1998   360

Linkeroever

  Antwerpen   Belgium     2,075     789     3,510     4,299     165       820     3,644     4,464     (402 )   2004   2002   360

Luik

  Luik   Belgium     2,085     924     3,403     4,327     235       938     3,624     4,562     (504 )   2004   2000   360

Machelen

  Machelen   Belgium     2,517     871     4,459     5,330     669       1,348     4,651     5,999     (1,021 )   2004   1997   360

Molenbeek

  Brussels   Belgium     1,978     839     3,242     4,081     150       839     3,392     4,231     (847 )   2004   1995   360

Overijse

  Overijse   Belgium     2,299     1,459     3,385     4,844     541       1,644     3,741     5,385     (613 )   2004   1998   360

Sint Pieters Leeuw

  Brussels   Belgium     2,344     743     4,206     4,949     195       806     4,338     5,144     (651 )   2004   2001   360

Waterloo

  Waterloo   Belgium     4,899     626     7,680     8,306     984       1,913     7,377     9,290     (1,581 )   2004   1995   360

Wavre

  Wavre   Belgium     2,199     851     3,704     4,555     33       851     3,737     4,588     (275 )   2004   2003   360

Zaventem

  Zaventem   Belgium     3,983     3,272     5,090     8,362     1,038       3,706     5,694     9,400     (2,156 )   2004   1996   360

Amager

  Copenhagen   Denmark     4,457     475     6,683     7,158     60       481     6,737     7,218     (152 )   2005   2005   360

Herlev

  Copenhagen   Denmark     4,350     2,197     4,124     6,321     414       2,223     4,512     6,735     (161 )   2004   2004   360

Hørsholm

  Hørsholm   Denmark     4,543     1,373     7,775     9,148     664       1,440     8,372     9,812     (708 )   2004   2002   360

Hvidovre

  Hvidovre   Denmark     4,780     1,907     8,133     10,040     845       1,968     8,917     10,885     (976 )   2004   2001   360

Ishøj

  Ishøj   Denmark     3,595     1,203     6,232     7,435     182       1,203     6,414     7,617     (736 )   2004   2001   360

Osterbro

  Copenhagen   Denmark     4,724     2,332     7,409     9,741     259       2,351     7,649     10,000     (611 )   2004   2003   360

Roskilde

  Roskilde   Denmark     4,603     2,348     7,645     9,993     57       2,348     7,702     10,050     (672 )   2004   2002   360

Tårnby

  Copenhagen   Denmark     4,705     1,753     5,195     6,948     317       1,773     5,492     7,265     (297 )   2004   2004   360

Aix La Pioline

  Marseille   France     4,089     1,748     4,643     6,391     24       1,748     4,667     6,415     (20 )   2005   2005   360

Asnières

  Asnières   France     5,285     2,762     8,485     11,247     821       2,964     9,104     12,068     (1,439 )   2004   2001   360

Avignon

  Avignon   France     3,403     1,255     3,389     4,644     653       1,283     4,014     5,297     (133 )   2004   2004   360

Ballainvilliers

  Ballainvilliers   France     3,612     1,918     5,673     7,591     214       1,934     5,871     7,805     (1,052 )   2004   2000   360

Buchelay

  Buchelay   France     3,567     1,465     6,090     7,555     231       1,465     6,321     7,786     (1,051 )   2004   2001   360

Chambourcy

  Chambourcy   France     4,602     3,806     6,042     9,848     382       3,980     6,250     10,230     (435 )   2004   2003   360

Coignières

  Coignières   France     3,330     1,536     5,514     7,050     443       1,611     5,882     7,493     (860 )   2004   2001   360

 

F-66


Table of Contents

SCHEDULE III—REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION—(Continued)

 

Property Name

  Location   State or
Country (3)
      INITIAL COST   Costs
Subsequent
to
Acquisition
  Gross Amount as of
December 31, 2005
            Depr.
Life
in
mos.
      Encum-
brances (2)
  Land   Building,
Equip.
& Other
  Gross
Storage
Centers
    Land and
Land Held
for Sale
  Building
Equip.
& Other
  Gross
Storage
centers
  Accum.
Depr.
    Owned
Since
  Year
Built
 

Epinay

  Epinay   France   3,620   1,401   6,290   7,691   65   1,401   6,355   7,756   (843 )   2004   2002   360

Eragny

  Paris   France   3,770   748   5,071   5,819   71   756   5,134   5,890   (380 )   2004   2003   360

Fresnes

  Fresnes   France   3,988   2,514   5,961   8,475   717   2,733   6,459   9,192   (1,089 )   2004   2000   360

Grigny

  Grigny   France   3,586   1,312   6,288   7,600   73   1,312   6,361   7,673   (924 )   2004   2001   360

La Seyne

  La Seyne-sur-mer   France   3,330   749   6,226   6,975   368   838   6,505   7,343   (776 )   2004   2002   360

Lormont

  Bordeaux   France   3,676   914   5,004   5,918   32   914   5,036   5,950   (29 )   2005   2005   360

Lyon Gerland

  Lyon   France   3,987   3,291   5,104   8,395   105   3,291   5,209   8,500   (529 )   2004   2002   360

Lyon Sarrazin

  Lyon   France   4,178   720   6,111   6,831   34   720   6,145   6,865   (24 )   2005   2005   360

Lyon Vaise

  Lyon   France   3,997   2,168   3,855   6,023   335   2,192   4,166   6,358   (244 )   2004   2003   360

Marseille

  Marseille   France   4,193   1,958   6,928   8,886   140   1,964   7,062   9,026   (942 )   2004   2002   360

Marseille Bonneveine

  Marseille   France   3,534   2,280   3,234   5,514   69   2,305   3,278   5,583   (303 )   2004   2003   360

Mérignac

  Bordeaux   France   3,696   1,097   4,379   5,476   311   1,110   4,677   5,787   (194 )   2004   2004   360

Montrouge

  Montrouge   France   2,798   988   6,474   7,462   1,470   988   7,944   8,932   (2,554 )   2004   1997   360

Nanterre

  Nanterre   France   5,089   2,787   7,487   10,274   1,727   3,148   8,853   12,001   (1,614 )   2004   2000   360

Nice

  Nice   France   3,699   1,710   4,576   6,286   2,118   1,878   6,526   8,404   (2,335 )   2004   1997   360

Noisy

  Noisy   France   4,592   2,618   6,984   9,602   346   2,705   7,243   9,948   (744 )   2004   2002   360

Osny

  Osny   France   2,899   1,134   4,982   6,116   503   1,203   5,416   6,619   (1,001 )   2004   2000   360

Pessac

  Bordeaux   France   3,085   1,427   3,793   5,220   67   1,443   3,844   5,287   (133 )   2004   2004   360

Pierrefitte

  Paris   France   4,205   1,964   4,163   6,127   656   1,986   4,797   6,783   (190 )   2004   2004   360

Poissonniers

  Paris   France   6,449   1,968   10,262   12,230   58   1,968   10,320   12,288   (5 )   2005   2005   360

Pontault Combault

  Pontault Combault   France   2,989   1,116   5,205   6,321   706   1,187   5,840   7,027   (1,138 )   2004   1999   360

Port-Marly

  Port-Marly   France   3,248   1,207   5,681   6,888   994   1,434   6,448   7,882   (1,037 )   2004   2000   360

Rosny

  Rosny   France   3,708   1,551   6,273   7,824   941   1,691   7,074   8,765   (1,139 )   2004   2000   360

Sevran

  Sevran   France   3,780   1,471   6,572   8,043   110   1,470   6,683   8,153   (763 )   2004   2002   360

Sucy

  Paris   France   4,433   3,278   3,584   6,862   98   3,315   3,645   6,960   (322 )   2004   2003   360

Thiais

  Thiais   France   5,136   4,266   6,537   10,803   227   4,366   6,664   11,030   (861 )   2004   2001   360

Varlin

  Varlin   France   277   —     550   550   572   —     1,122   1,122   (696 )   2004   1997   360

Villejust

  Villejust   France   3,546   1,504   5,996   7,500   457   1,553   6,404   7,957   (1,151 )   2004   2000   360

Vitrolles

  Vitrolles   France   3,780   1,799   6,201   8,000   98   1,803   6,295   8,098   (759 )   2004   2002   360

Wambrechies

  Lille   France   2,927   1,593   2,837   4,430   134   1,611   2,953   4,564   (184 )   2004   2003   360

Wasquehal

  Lille   France   3,533   708   4,750   5,458   45   716   4,787   5,503   (83 )   2005   2005   360

Wattignies

  Lille   France   3,252   640   4,606   5,246   81   647   4,680   5,327   (288 )   2004   2003   360

 

F-67


Table of Contents

SCHEDULE III—REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION—(Continued)

 

Property Name

  Location   State or
Country (3)
      INITIAL COST   Costs
Subsequent
to
Acquisition
    Gross Amount as of
December 31, 2005
            Depr.
Life
in
mos.
      Encum-
brances (2)
  Land   Building,
Equip.
& Other
  Gross
Storage
Centers
    Land and
Land Held
for Sale
  Building
Equip.
& Other
  Gross
Storage
centers
  Accum.
Depr.
    Owned
Since
  Year
Built
 

Bonn Bornheimer Strasse

  Bonn   Germany   4,244   2,129   4,452   6,581   122     2,152   4,551   6,703   (226 )   2004   2004   360

Düsseldorf Erkrather Strasse

  Düsseldorf   Germany   4,240   1,508   5,023   6,531   170     1,538   5,163   6,701   (326 )   2004   2003   360

Düsseldorf Heerdter Landstrasse

  Düsseldorf   Germany   3,753   1,064   5,079   6,143   4     1,078   5,069   6,147   (361 )   2004   2003   360

Essen Martin Luther Strasse

  Essen   Germany   4,580   1,689   5,979   7,668   28     1,708   5,988   7,696   (435 )   2004   2003   360

Köln Clevischer Ring

  Köln   Germany   3,571   1,362   4,813   6,175   47     1,362   4,860   6,222   (66 )   2005   2005   360

Köln Melatengürtel

  Köln   Germany   4,635   2,277   4,609   6,886   54     2,297   4,643   6,940   (230 )   2004   2004   360

Krefeld Diessemer Bruch

  Krefeld   Germany   3,522   926   4,476   5,402   425     936   4,891   5,827   (230 )   2004   2004   360

Mönchengladbach Krefelder Strasse

  Mönchengladbach   Germany   4,012   1,575   4,707   6,282   95     1,592   4,785   6,377   (345 )   2004   2003   360

Mönchengladbach Waldnieler Strasse

  Mönchengladbach   Germany   4,197   1,980   4,590   6,570   64     2,001   4,633   6,634   (340 )   2004   2003   360

Mülheim Düsseldorfer Strasse

  Essen   Germany   3,617   868   4,631   5,499   40     876   4,663   5,539   (81 )   2005   2005   360

Wuppertal Friedrich-Engels-Alle

  Wuppertal   Germany   3,859   926   4,556   5,482   575     935   5,122   6,057   (169 )   2004   2004   360

Almere

  Amsterdam   Netherlands   4,005   1,066   4,766   5,832   397     1,078   5,151   6,229   (340 )   2004   2003   360

Amersfoort

  Amersfoort   Netherlands   5,984   3,136   5,931   9,067   (2,097 )   683   6,287   6,970   (859 )   2004   2000   360

Amstelveen

  Amsterdam   Netherlands   2,448   —     3,584   3,584   181     —     3,765   3,765   (235 )   2004   2003   360

Amsterdam

  Amsterdam   Netherlands   2,738   287   3,527   3,814   2,432     287   5,959   6,246   (733 )   2004   2000   360

Amsterdam Badhoeve

  Amsterdam   Netherlands   3,546   1,404   3,886   5,290   371     1,420   4,241   5,661   (251 )   2004   2003   360

Amsterdam Sneevliet

  Amsterdam   Netherlands   4,259   —     4,525   4,525   117     —     4,642   4,642   (342 )   2004   2003   360

Apeldoorn

  Apeldoorn   Netherlands   3,256   1,666   5,207   6,873   312     1,704   5,481   7,185   (683 )   2004   2001   360

Breda

  Breda   Netherlands   3,975   2,267   6,169   8,436   252     2,341   6,347   8,688   (785 )   2004   2001   360

Delft

  Delft   Netherlands   3,910   2,386   4,778   7,164   972     2,466   5,670   8,136   (512 )   2004   2002   360

Den Haag

  The Hague   Netherlands   4,908   782   9,420   10,202   974     782   10,394   11,176   (1,657 )   2004   1999   360

Den Haag 2, Lozerlaan

  The Hague   Netherlands   326   —     3,268   3,268   —       —     3,268   3,268   —       2005   2005   360

 

F-68


Table of Contents

SCHEDULE III—REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION—(Continued)

 

Property Name

  Location   State or
Country (3)
      INITIAL COST   Costs
Subsequent
to
Acquisition
    Gross Amount as of
December 31, 2005
            Depr.
Life
in
mos.
      Encum-
brances (2)
  Land   Building,
Equip.
& Other
  Gross
Storage
Centers
    Land and
Land Held
for Sale
  Building
Equip.
& Other
  Gross
Storage
centers
  Accum.
Depr.
    Owned
Since
  Year
Built
 

Diemen

  Amsterdam   Netherlands   4,256   3,755   5,224   8,979   460     4,074   5,365   9,439   (508 )   2004   2002   360

Dordrecht Ampere

  Dordrecht   Netherlands   3,265   1,501   4,465   5,966   772     1,513   5,225   6,738   (466 )   2004   2002   360

Dordrecht II

  Dordrecht   Netherlands   4,048   2,011   6,467   8,478   153     2,037   6,594   8,631   (711 )   2004   2001   360

Ede

  Ede   Netherlands   3,268   484   5,933   6,417   485     484   6,418   6,902   (692 )   2004   2002   360

Eindhoven Praxis

  Eindhoven   Netherlands   2,847   —     4,344   4,344   7     —     4,351   4,351   —       2005   2005   360

Heemstede

  Amsterdam   Netherlands   6,459   3,434   6,257   9,691   (2,037 )   730   6,924   7,654   (772 )   2004   2001   360

Kerkrade—Heerlen

  Kerkrade   Netherlands   3,119   1,343   5,235   6,578   107     1,342   5,343   6,685   (623 )   2004   2001   360

Maastricht

  Maastricht   Netherlands   3,047   389   4,318   4,707   1,446     448   5,705   6,153   (794 )   2004   2000   360

Nijmegen

  Nijmegen   Netherlands   2,385   —     5,032   5,032   300     —     5,332   5,332   (562 )   2004   2001   360

Rijswijk

  Rijswijk   Netherlands   3,260   511   6,275   6,786   483     511   6,758   7,269   (638 )   2004   2002   360

Rotterdam

  Rotterdam   Netherlands   2,990   1,121   5,168   6,289   836     1,121   6,004   7,125   (845 )   2004   2000   360

Rotterdam Stadionweg

  Rotterdam   Netherlands   2,957   1,302   4,934   6,236   248     1,328   5,156   6,484   (585 )   2004   2001   360

Spaanse Polder

  Rotterdam   Netherlands   2,200   —     5,238   5,238   402     —     5,640   5,640   (743 )   2004   2001   360

Spijkenisse

  Rotterdam   Netherlands   3,369   1,399   5,779   7,178   51     1,399   5,830   7,229   (410 )   2004   2003   360

Tilburg

  Tilburg   Netherlands   3,502   1,209   4,101   5,310   132     1,223   4,219   5,442   (270 )   2004   2003   360

Utrecht Cartesius

  Utrecht   Netherlands   3,887   2,151   5,066   7,217   1,006     2,244   5,979   8,223   (522 )   2004   2002   360

Utrecht Franciscus

  Utrecht   Netherlands   4,466   2,930   4,141   7,071   90     2,963   4,198   7,161   (342 )   2004   2003   360

Utrecht Nieuwegein

  Utrecht   Netherlands   3,858   2,129   5,975   8,104   1,000     2,397   6,707   9,104   (925 )   2004   2000   360

Veldhoven

  Eindhoven   Netherlands   3,728   1,944   5,032   6,976   903     2,014   5,865   7,879   (530 )   2004   2002   360

Zaandam

  Amsterdam   Netherlands   3,608   2,059   5,544   7,603   203     2,106   5,700   7,806   (750 )   2004   2001   360

Zoetermeer

  The Hague   Netherlands   335   —     3,278   3,278   —       —     3,278   3,278   —       2005   2005   360

Årstaberg

  Årstaberg   Sweden   3,831   1,548   5,680   7,228   679     1,548   6,359   7,907   (709 )   2004   2002   360

Danderyd

  Danderyd   Sweden   4,206   1,760   6,623   8,383   446     1,791   7,038   8,829   (794 )   2004   2002   360

Handen

  Handen   Sweden   3,652   1,147   6,356   7,503   810     1,296   7,017   8,313   (1,611 )   2004   1999   360

Helsingborg

  Malmö   Sweden   3,292   559   3,976   4,535   240     565   4,210   4,775   (428 )   2004   2003   360

Högdalen

  Högdalen   Sweden   3,756   1,319   6,378   7,697   292     1,319   6,670   7,989   (947 )   2004   2002   360

Jakobsberg

  Jakobsberg   Sweden   2,769   503   5,180   5,683   946     928   5,701   6,629   (1,612 )   2004   1998   360

Kungens Kurva

  Kungens
Kurva
  Sweden   3,581   1,087   6,271   7,358   1,398     2,376   6,380   8,756   (2,108 )   2004   1998   360

Lund (MMÖ)

  Malmö   Sweden   2,896   1,468   4,423   5,891   250     1,511   4,630   6,141   (723 )   2004   2001   360

Lundavägen (MMÖ)

  Malmö   Sweden   4,110   2,168   5,737   7,905   1,150     2,372   6,683   9,055   (1,307 )   2004   2000   360

Minelund (GBG)

  Goteborg   Sweden   3,628   1,736   5,742   7,478   419     1,824   6,073   7,897   (1,005 )   2004   2001   360

Molndal (GBG)

  Goteborg   Sweden   3,493   1,249   5,958   7,207   848     1,699   6,356   8,055   (1,529 )   2004   1999   360

 

F-69


Table of Contents

SCHEDULE III—REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION—(Continued)

 

Property Name

  Location   State or
Country (3)
      INITIAL COST   Costs
Subsequent
to
Acquisition
  Gross Amount as of December 31, 2005             Depr.
Life
in
mos.
      Encum-
brances (2)
  Land   Building,
Equip. &
Other
  Gross
Storage
Centers
    Land and
Land Held
for Sale
  Building
Equip.
& Other
  Gross
Storage
centers
  Accum.
Depr.
    Owned
Since
  Year
Built
 

Moraberg (STHLM)

  Stockholm   Sweden     3,365     1,171     5,724     6,895     293     1,299     5,889     7,188     (1,173 )   2004   2000   360

Rissne

  Rissne   Sweden     3,991     2,450     5,774     8,224     945     2,450     6,719     9,169     (1,715 )   2004   1998   360

Sköndal

  Sköndal   Sweden     3,644     1,380     6,097     7,477     303     1,379     6,401     7,780     (853 )   2004   2001   360

Sodermalm

  Sodermalm   Sweden     1,330     333     2,111     2,444     525     332     2,637     2,969     (909 )   2004   1999   360

Solna

  Solna   Sweden     6,614     2,445     11,097     13,542     1,813     3,361     11,994     15,355     (2,849 )   2004   1999   360

Taby

  Taby   Sweden     3,320     1,415     5,401     6,816     1,057     1,654     6,219     7,873     (1,672 )   2004   1998   360

Upplands Väsby

  Upplands Väsby   Sweden     3,873     1,418     6,509     7,927     348     1,429     6,846     8,275     (1,282 )   2004   2001   360

Uppsala

  Uppsala   Sweden     3,370     983     5,925     6,908     699     1,124     6,483     7,607     (1,580 )   2004   1999   360

Vällingby

  Stockholm   Sweden     4,258     2,509     6,149     8,658     255     2,509     6,404     8,913     (454 )   2004   2003   360

Västra Frölunda (GBG)

  Goteborg   Sweden     3,651     2,324     5,132     7,456     422     2,489     5,389     7,878     (810 )   2004   2001   360

Ystadsvägen (MMÖ)

  Malmö   Sweden     3,128     1,073     5,231     6,304     336     1,078     5,562     6,640     (821 )   2004   2001   360

Croydon

  Croydon   UK     5,574     3,887     8,216     12,103     1,621     4,597     9,127     13,724     (1,411 )   2004   1999   360

Edgeware

  Edgeware   UK     7,326     3,133     7,633     10,766     112     3,168     7,710     10,878     (505 )   2004   2003   360

Ewell

  Ewell   UK     5,595     3,301     8,841     12,142     2,145     3,994     10,293     14,287     (1,261 )   2004   2001   360

Forest Hill

  London   UK     6,908     3,351     7,837     11,188     113     3,389     7,912     11,301     (176 )   2004   2005   360

Greenford

  Greenford   UK     8,590     5,966     12,670     18,636     1,524     7,348     12,812     20,160     (1,208 )   2004   2002   360

Gypsy Corner

  London   UK     6,685     4,784     9,456     14,240     920     5,461     9,699     15,160     (688 )   2004   2003   360

Hanworth

  Hanworth   UK     5,457     4,424     7,436     11,860     1,350     5,539     7,671     13,210     (1,187 )   2004   2000   360

Hatch End

  Harrow   UK     7,309     2,823     6,726     9,549     531     2,847     7,233     10,080     (253 )   2004   2004   360

Hayes

  Hayes   UK     5,500     3,532     8,358     11,890     1,667     4,582     8,975     13,557     (1,382 )   2004   1999   360

Neasden

  Neasden   UK     7,316     5,345     10,479     15,824     926     5,812     10,938     16,750     (1,290 )   2004   2001   360

Putney

  Putney   UK     7,455     5,129     10,847     15,976     1,057     5,510     11,523     17,033     (1,069 )   2004   2002   360

Reading

  Reading   UK     6,636     6,016     8,353     14,369     141     6,119     8,391     14,510     (1,259 )   2004   2000   360

Ruislip

  Ruislip   UK     4,507     —       9,766     9,766     1,665     —       11,431     11,431     (1,030 )   2004   2002   360

Streatham

  London   UK     4,564     3,847     6,001     9,848     882     4,136     6,594     10,730     (985 )   2004   1999   360

Surbiton

  Surbiton   UK     —       3,351     2,033     5,384     246     3,395     2,235     5,630     (128 )   2004   2004   360

Wallington

  London   UK     6,094     2,130     6,793     8,923     72     2,130     6,865     8,995     (112 )   2005   2005   360

West London

  London   UK     —       4,989     8,884     13,873     762     5,118     9,517     14,635     (416 )   2004   2004   360

Wokingham

  Wokingham   UK     6,124     6,306     7,033     13,339     552     6,703     7,188     13,891     (628 )   2004   2003   360

Borsbeek (1)

  Antwerpen   Belgium     —       —       —       —       2,238     2,238     —       2,238     —       2005   2006   360

Europe Corporate

  Brussels   Belgium     —       —       7,086     7,086     50     7     7,129     7,136     (6,037 )   2004   1996   360
                                                                 

European total

        575,632     266,556     853,908     1,120,464     72,799     283,839     909,424     1,193,263     (119,234 )      
                                                                 

Total (4)

      $ 824,373   $ 643,080   $ 2,275,724   $ 2,918,804   $ 332,227   $ 682,153   $ 2,568,879   $ 3,251,032   $ (552,171 )      
                                                                 

 

F-70


Table of Contents

SCHEDULE III—REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION—(Continued)

 


(1) These properties were classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2005.
(2) In addition to encumbrances listed we had $1.2 million of mortgage debt on two properties under construction in Europe.
(3) All amounts for properties in foreign countries have been translated from the functional currency of the country at the balance sheet rate as of December 31, 2005.
(4) Gross amounts as of December 31, 2005, included properties held for sale of $6.8 million (including properties subsequently reclassified to properties held for use as of March 31, 2006, as discussed in Note 25 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements).
(5) These properties were reclassified to properties held for use from properties held for sale as of March 31, 2006.

 

F-71


Table of Contents

SCHEDULE III—REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION—(Continued)

The following tables reconcile the changes in land, building, equipment and other, as well as accumulated depreciation over the last three years:

 

     (in thousands)  

Land, Building, Equipment and Other

    

Balance at January 1, 2003

     $ 1,728,636  

Additions during the period

    

Acquisitions

   $ 123,234    

Developments

     41,219    

Improvements and other

     23,282    
          
       187,735  

Cost of real estate sold or disposed

       (13,735 )
          

Balance at December 31, 2003

       1,902,636  

Additions during the period

    

Effect of consolidation of Shurgard Europe

     966,437    

Acquisitions

     70,501    

Developments

     166,072    

Improvements and other

     10,170    

Effect of change in currency translation rate

     62,356    
          
       1,275,536  

Cost of real estate sold or disposed

       (34,684 )
          

Balance at December 31, 2004

       3,143,488  

Additions during the period

    

Acquisitions

     96,304    

Developments

     125,820    

Improvements and other

     45,241    

Effect of change in currency translation rate

     (155,136 )  
          
       112,229  

Cost of real estate sold or disposed

       (11,459 )
          

Balance at December 31, 2005

     $ 3,244,258  
          

Accumulated Depreciation

    

Balance at January 1, 2003

     $ 274,435  

Depreciation expense

       54,253  

Depreciation associated with discontinued operations

       842  

Disposals

       (7,525 )
          

Balance at December 31, 2003

       322,005  

Effect of consolidation of Shurgard Europe

       72,275  

Depreciation expense

       86,138  

Depreciation associated with discontinued operations

       625  

Disposals

       (5,526 )

Effect of change in currency translation rate

       4,014  
          

Balance at December 31, 2004

       479,531  

Depreciation expense

       92,819  

Depreciation associated with discontinued operations

       99  

Disposals

       (5,947 )

Effect of change in currency translation rate

       (14,331 )
          

Balance at December 31, 2005

     $ 552,171  
          

 

F-72


Table of Contents

Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc.

Part I, Item 1: Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(unaudited)

(Amounts in thousands except share and per share data)

 

     June 30,
2006
    December 31,
2005
 

ASSETS

    

Storage centers:

    

Operating storage centers

   $ 3,402,653     $ 3,244,258  

Less accumulated depreciation

     (605,228 )     (552,171 )
                

Operating storage centers, net

     2,797,425       2,692,087  

Construction in progress

     77,396       67,073  

Properties held for sale

     3,893       6,774  
                

Total storage centers

     2,878,714       2,765,934  

Cash and cash equivalents

     40,938       39,778  

Restricted cash

     3,236       4,972  

Goodwill

     27,440       27,440  

Other assets

     132,038       119,248  
                

Total assets

   $ 3,082,366     $ 2,957,372  
                

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

    

Accounts payable and other liabilities

   $ 153,874     $ 181,435  

Lines of credit

     626,700       583,500  

Notes payable

     1,355,320       1,275,720  
                

Total liabilities

     2,135,894       2,040,655  
                

Minority interest

     145,679       116,365  

Commitments and contingencies (Note 17)

    

Shareholders’ equity:

    

Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock; $0.001 par value; 2,000,000 shares authorized; 2,000,000 shares issued and outstanding; liquidation preference of $50,000

     48,115       48,115  

Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock; $0.001 par value; 3,450,000 shares authorized; 3,450,000 shares issued and outstanding; liquidation preference of $86,250

     83,068       83,068  

Class A Common Stock; $0.001 par value; 120,000,000 shares authorized; 47,434,615 and 47,041,680 shares issued and outstanding, respectively

     47       47  

Additional paid-in capital

     1,156,916       1,142,288  

Accumulated deficit

     (501,327 )     (459,586 )

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

     13,974       (13,580 )
                

Total shareholders’ equity

     800,793       800,352  
                

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

   $ 3,082,366     $ 2,957,372  
                

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

 

F-73


Table of Contents

Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc.

Part I, Item 1: Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

(unaudited)

(Amounts in thousands except share and per share data)

 

     For the three months
ended June 30,
    For the six months
ended June 30,
 
     2006     2005     2006     2005  

Revenue

        

Storage center operations

   $ 135,165     $ 118,118     $ 261,933     $ 230,356  

Other

     1,089       1,350       1,931       2,736  
                                

Total revenue

     136,254       119,468       263,864       233,092  
                                

Expenses

        

Operating

     61,510       57,812       122,604       116,890  

Real estate development

     1,945       2,713       3,615       5,643  

Depreciation and amortization

     26,342       23,252       52,265       46,596  

Impairment and abandoned project expense

     255       868       800       1,191  

General, administrative and other

     7,018       10,914       14,471       18,943  
                                

Total storage center expenses

     97,070       95,559       193,755       189,263  
                                

Income from operations

     39,184       23,909       70,109       43,829  
                                

Other Income (Expense)

        

Costs related to proposed merger (Note 17)

     (1,363 )     —         (2,828 )     —    

Interest expense

     (30,845 )     (25,485 )     (60,249 )     (49,610 )

Gain (loss) on derivatives, net

     418       (1,353 )     1,109       (1,712 )

Foreign exchange gain (loss)

     378       (5,715 )     503       (9,563 )

Interest income and other, net

     464       1,270       869       2,230  
                                

Other expense, net

     (30,948 )     (31,283 )     (60,596 )     (58,655 )
                                

Income (loss) before minority interest, equity in earnings of other real estate investments, net and income tax expense

     8,236       (7,374 )     9,513       (14,826 )

Minority interest

     3,953       6,876       7,886       12,986  

Equity in earnings of other real estate investments, net

     —         12       —         33  

Income tax expense

     (75 )     (379 )     (94 )     (389 )
                                

Income (loss) from continuing operations

     12,114       (865 )     17,305       (2,196 )

Discontinued operations

        

(Loss) income from discontinued operations

     (74 )     172       (6 )     336  

Gain on sale of discontinued operations

     —         —         —         6,423  
                                

Total (loss) income from discontinued operations

     (74 )     172       (6 )     6,759  

Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle (Note 10)

     —         —         (200 )     —    
                                

Net Income (loss)

     12,040       (693 )     17,099       4,563  

Net Income (loss) allocation

        

Preferred stock dividends and other

     (3,035 )     (3,039 )     (6,072 )     (6,080 )
                                

Net income (loss) available to common shareholders

   $ 9,005     $ (3,732 )   $ 11,027     $ (1,517 )
                                

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

 

F-74


Table of Contents

Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc.

Part I, Item 1: Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations—(Continued)

(unaudited)

(Amounts in thousands except share and per share data)

 

     For the three months
ended June 30,
    For the six months
ended June 30,
 
         2006          2005             2006            2005      

Basic per share amounts:

          

Income (loss) from continuing operations available to common shareholders

   $ 0.19    $ (0.08 )   $ 0.23    $ (0.18 )

Discontinued operations

     —        —         —        0.15  

Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle

     —        —         —        —    
                              

Net income (loss) available to common shareholders per share

   $ 0.19    $ (0.08 )   $ 0.23    $ (0.03 )
                              

Diluted per share amounts:

          

Income (loss) from continuing operations available to common shareholders

   $ 0.19    $ (0.08 )   $ 0.23    $ (0.18 )

Discontinued operations

     —        —         —        0.15  

Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle

     —        —         —        —    
                              

Net income (loss) available to common shareholders per share

   $ 0.19    $ (0.08 )   $ 0.23    $ (0.03 )
                              

Distributions per common share

   $ 0.56    $ 0.56     $ 1.12    $ 1.11  
                              

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

 

F-75


Table of Contents

Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc.

Part I, Item 1: Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(unaudited)

(Amounts in thousands)

 

     For the six months
ended June 30,
 
     2006     2005  

Operating activities:

    

Net income

   $ 17,099     $ 4,563  

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

    

Loss (gain) on sale of assets, including discontinued operations

     88       (6,423 )

Depreciation, amortization and impairment losses

     52,269       46,931  

(Gain) loss on derivatives, net

     (1,109 )     1,712  

Stock-based compensation expense

     3,664       1,600  

Non-cash interest and other

     4,392       4,508  

Foreign exchange (gain) loss

     (503 )     9,563  

Minority interest

     (7,886 )     (12,986 )

Changes in operating accounts, net of effect of acquisitions:

    

Payments of accrued costs related to proposed merger

     (10,840 )     —    

Other assets

     (2,638 )     (9,156 )

Accounts payable and other liabilities

     (6,465 )     5,089  
                

Net cash provided by operating activities

     48,071       45,401  
                

Investing activities:

    

Construction on and improvements to storage centers

     (60,652 )     (65,449 )

Acquisitions of storage centers, including associated intangible assets

     (3,114 )     (34,467 )

Payment for purchase of 3S-Self-Storage, net of cash acquired

     (46,997 )     —    

Purchase of additional interest in affiliated partnerships

     (2,866 )     (97,397 )

Purchase of intangible assets

     (1,348 )     (1,299 )

Proceeds from sale of assets

     3,645       13,040  

Decrease in restricted cash

     1,883       1,432  

Increase in notes receivable

     (539 )     (1,253 )
                

Net cash used in investing activities

     (109,988 )     (185,393 )
                

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

 

F-76


Table of Contents

Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc.

Part I, Item 1: Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows—(Continued)

(unaudited)

(Amounts in thousands)

 

     For the six months
ended June 30,
 
     2006     2005  

Financing activities:

    

Proceeds from notes payable

   $ 45,847     $ 37,876  

Payments on notes payable

     (1,747 )     (1,480 )

Proceeds from lines of credit

     127,100       761,000  

Payments on lines of credit

     (83,900 )     (600,900 )

Payment of loan costs

     (2,420 )     (3,608 )

Distributions paid on common and preferred stock

     (61,814 )     (57,803 )

Payments on derivatives, net

     (95 )     (14,933 )

Proceeds from exercise of stock options and dividend reinvestment plan

     12,113       562  

Contributions received from minority partners

     30,044       12,394  

Distributions paid to minority partners

     (3,317 )     (2,074 )
                

Net cash provided by financing activities

     61,811       131,034  
                

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

     1,266       (3,840 )
                

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

     1,160       (12,798 )

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

     39,778       50,277  
                

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

   $ 40,938     $ 37,479  
                

Supplemental schedule of cash flow information:

    

Cash paid for interest, net of amounts capitalized

   $ 56,499     $ 46,372  
                

Cash paid for income taxes

   $ 494     $ 1,642  
                

Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing and financing information:

    

Common stock issued in acquisition of storage centers

   $ —       $ 5,490  
                

Notes receivable forgiven in the acquisition of storage centers

   $ —       $ 6,727  
                

Minority interests granted in acquisition of storage centers

   $ —       $ 4,834  
                

Liabilities assumed in acquisition of management contracts

   $ —       $ 1,200  
                

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

 

F-77


Table of Contents

Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc.

Part I, Item 1: Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006

(unaudited)

Note 1—Organization

Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company,” “we,” “Shurgard” or “us”) are engaged principally in investing in, acquiring, developing and operating self-storage centers located throughout the United States and in Western Europe. Our revenues are generated primarily from leasing self-storage space to tenants on a month-to-month basis. We also provide ancillary services at our storage centers consisting primarily of truck rentals and sales of storage products.

On March 6, 2006, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (Merger Agreement) with Public Storage, Inc. (Public Storage), which contemplates that we will be merged with and into a subsidiary of Public Storage. Each outstanding share of our common stock will be converted into the right to receive 0.82 of a fully paid and non-assessable share of Public Storage common stock. We will treat the merger as if we had sold all our assets to the subsidiary of Public Storage in a fully taxable transaction and then made a liquidating distribution of the merger consideration to our shareholders in exchange for our outstanding common stock. In addition, in connection with the merger, and pursuant to the notice of redemption issued July 24, 2006, we expect to redeem each outstanding series of our preferred stock in accordance with its terms. Public Storage will assume approximately $2.0 billion of our debt. Our board of directors and the board of directors of Public Storage have approved the Merger Agreement. The proposed merger is subject to our shareholders’ approval, Public Storage’s shareholders’ approval of the issuance of shares of Public Storage common stock to be used as merger consideration and other customary closing conditions. (See further discussion at Note 17).

Note 2—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of presentation:    The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Shurgard and our consolidated subsidiaries presented on an accrual basis in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) for interim financial information and in accordance with the requirements of Form 10-Q pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, they do not include all of the disclosures required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In our opinion, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, considered necessary for a fair presentation of our financial condition at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, the results of operations for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, and the cash flows for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of the results for the year. The interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. All amounts are presented in U.S. dollars unless indicated otherwise; all balances related to our foreign subsidiaries have been translated into U.S. dollars at period-average or period-end exchange rates as appropriate. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The interim financial statements assume that Shurgard continues as a separate public company, and therefore do not reflect the effects of transactions or decisions that are contingent on the completion of the proposed merger with Public Storage.

Consolidated and unconsolidated subsidiaries:    We consolidate all wholly-owned subsidiaries. We assess whether our subsidiaries are Variable Interest Entities (VIEs) as defined by the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (FASB) Interpretation No. (FIN) 46R, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities.” Upon implementation of FIN 46R in January of 2004, we consolidated all VIEs of which we are the primary beneficiary. We evaluate partially-owned subsidiaries and joint ventures held in partnership form to determine whether rights held by other investors constitute substantive participating rights in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 04-5, “Determining Whether a General Partner, or the General Partners as a

 

F-78


Table of Contents

Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc.

Part I, Item 1: Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006

(unaudited)

 

Group, Controls a Limited Partnership or Similar Entity When the Limited Partners Have Certain Rights.” For partially-owned subsidiaries or joint ventures held in corporate form (including limited liability companies with governance provisions that are the functional equivalent of regular corporations), we consider the guidance of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 94, “Consolidation of All Majority-Owned Subsidiaries” and EITF Issue No. 96-16, “Investor’s Accounting for an Investee When the Investor has a Majority of the Voting Interest but the Minority Shareholder or Shareholders Have Certain Approval or Veto Rights” and, in particular, whether rights held by other investors would be viewed as “participating rights” as defined therein. To the extent that any minority investor has substantive participating rights, has the ability to dissolve the partnership or remove the general partner without cause in a partnership or participating rights in a corporation, including substantive veto rights, the related entity will generally not be consolidated.

Use of estimates:    The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the amounts of revenues and expenses recognized during the reporting period. Significant estimates are inherent in the preparation of our financial statements and include the evaluation of impairment of long-lived assets and goodwill, valuation allowances for deferred tax assets, estimated lives of depreciable and amortizable assets and the allocation of the purchase price of acquired businesses and properties and legal liabilities. Actual results could differ from these and other estimates.

Reclassifications: Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation with no effect on shareholders’ equity, net income or net cash-flows from operating, investing and financing activities.

Storage centers:    We carry storage centers to be developed or held and used in operations at depreciated cost, reduced for impairment losses where appropriate. We capitalize acquisition, development and construction costs of properties in development in accordance with SFAS No. 67, “Accounting for Costs and Initial Rental Operations of Real Estate Projects,” and include, where applicable, salaries and related costs, real estate taxes, interest, lease expense and preconstruction costs directly related to the project. Preconstruction costs, which included efforts to secure land control and zoning, to evaluate feasibility and to complete other initial tasks that are essential to development, incurred prior to the acquisition of the property or acquisition of an option to purchase the property being probable, are charged as real estate development expenses as incurred. Real estate development expense represents costs incurred in connection with real estate development projects that do not qualify for capitalization under the above provisions. In addition, for the six-month period ended June 30, 2006, real estate development includes $500,000 of non-capitalizable fees related to the financing of an acquisition completed in January 2006. We record abandonment losses for previously capitalized costs of development projects when we assess that the completion of the project is no longer probable. We capitalize development and construction costs and costs of significant improvements and replacements and renovations at storage centers, while we expense costs of maintenance and repairs as we incur them.

We compute depreciation of each operating storage center using the straight-line method based on the shorter of an estimated useful life of 30 years or the lease term for storage centers built on leased land. We evaluate and, if necessary, revise estimates of the useful lives of specific storage centers when we plan to demolish or replace them. We depreciate equipment and furniture and fixtures based on estimated useful lives of three to six years.

If events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an operating storage center may be impaired, we conduct a recoverability analysis based on expected undiscounted cash flows to be generated from the

 

F-79


Table of Contents

Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc.

Part I, Item 1: Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006

(unaudited)

 

property. If the analysis indicates that we cannot recover the carrying value from estimated future cash flows, we write down the property to its estimated fair value and recognize an impairment loss. We determine fair values based on expected future cash flows using appropriate market discount and capitalization rates.

We carry storage centers held for sale at the lower of their carrying value (i.e., cost less accumulated depreciation and any impairment loss recognized) or estimated fair value less costs to sell. We classify the net carrying values of properties as held for sale when the properties are actively marketed, their sale is considered probable within one year and various other criteria relating to their disposition are met. We discontinue depreciation of the operating storage centers at that time, but we continue to recognize operating revenues, operating expenses and interest expense until the date of sale. In accordance with SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” we report revenues and expense of properties classified as held for sale in discontinued operations for all periods presented if we will sell or have sold the properties on terms where we have no continuing involvement with them after the sale. If active marketing ceases or the properties no longer meet the criteria to be classified as held for sale, we reclassify the properties as held for use, resume depreciation and recognize the loss for the period that we classified the properties as held for sale, and we charge deferred selling costs, if any, to expense.

Acquisitions of businesses and storage centers: We allocate the purchase price of acquired storage centers and businesses to tangible and identified intangible assets based on their fair values. In making estimates of fair values for the purposes of allocating the purchase price, we rely primarily on our extensive knowledge of the market for storage centers and if considered appropriate, will consult with independent appraisers. In estimating the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets acquired, we also consider information obtained about each property as a result of our pre-acquisition due diligence, including independent appraisals that may be obtained in connection with the acquisition or financing of the respective assets.

The fair values of intangible assets include, where applicable, leases to customers with above market rents and in-place lease values. The fair values of these identifiable intangible assets are generally not significant, because substantially all leases in our business are month-to-month, and most customers use our facilities for less than one year. We expense internal costs related to the acquisition of a business, or an operating storage center, as we incur them.

Discontinued operations: We report real estate dispositions as discontinued operations separately as prescribed under the provisions of SFAS No. 144. Accordingly, we report the operating results attributable to operating properties sold or held for sale and the applicable gain or loss on the disposition of the properties as discontinued operations. The condensed consolidated statements of operations for prior periods are also adjusted to conform to this classification. There is no impact on our previously reported consolidated financial position, net income or cash flows.

Revenue recognition: The majority of our customers rent under month-to-month lease agreements and revenue is recognized at the contracted rate for each month occupied. Revenue related to customers who sign longer period leases is recognized ratably over the term of the lease. Management fee revenue is recognized each month for which services are rendered; these contracts are generally cancelable by either party on specified advanced notice. We recognize revenue related to profit sharing contracts related to our tenant insurance referral program based on the excess of premiums over actual and estimated claims and administrative costs. Revenues are presented net of provisions for doubtful accounts of $1.7 million and $1.6 million for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and of $3.3 million and $3.1 million for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

 

F-80


Table of Contents

Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc.

Part I, Item 1: Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006

(unaudited)

 

Income taxes: We have elected to be taxed as a Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT) pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. To qualify as a REIT, we must distribute annually to our shareholders at least 90% of our REIT taxable income and meet certain other requirements relating primarily to the nature of our assets and the sources of our revenues. As a REIT, we are not subject to U.S. federal income taxes to the extent of distributions. We believe that we met the qualifications for REIT status at December 31, 2005 and intend to meet the qualifications in the future and to distribute at least 90% of our REIT taxable income to shareholders in future tax years. Our domestic non-REIT activities are conducted primarily through Shurgard TRS, Inc., a taxable REIT subsidiary. Our foreign non-REIT activities are conducted primarily through six European taxable REIT subsidiaries. As a result, we have not provided for U.S. federal income taxes for the REIT in our financial statements. However, we do provide for U.S. federal income taxes for our domestic taxable REIT subsidiaries (TRSs). Additionally, both the REIT and our domestic TRSs are subject to certain state income taxes as well as certain franchise taxes. We also provide for income taxes of our European subsidiaries, which are subject to income taxes in the respective jurisdictions of the countries in which they operate.

We have deferred tax assets arising primarily from cumulative net operating losses arising in certain taxable subsidiaries. We evaluate both the positive and negative evidence that we believe is relevant in assessing whether we will realize the deferred tax assets. When we determine that it is more likely than not that we will not realize the tax asset either in part or in whole, we record a valuation allowance. One significant factor representing negative evidence in the evaluation of whether we will realize deferred tax assets arising from cumulative net operating losses is the historical taxable income or loss of the entity. In cases where a taxable entity has not demonstrated a history of achieving taxable income, this represents significant negative evidence in assessing whether we will realize the amounts and generally requires that we provide a valuation allowance.

Derivative financial instruments: We use derivative financial instruments to reduce risks associated with movements in interest and foreign currency exchange rates. We may choose to reduce cash flow and earnings volatility associated with interest rate risk exposure on existing variable-rate borrowings or forecasted variable and fixed-rate borrowings. In some instances, lenders may require us to do so. In order to limit interest rate risk on variable-rate borrowings, we may enter into interest rate swaps or interest rate caps to hedge specific risks. In order to limit interest rate risk on forecasted borrowings, we may enter into interest rate swaps, forward starting swaps, forward rate agreements, interest rate locks and interest rate collars. We may also use derivative financial instruments to reduce foreign currency exchange rate risks to our earnings, cash flows and financial position arising from forecasted intercompany foreign currency denominated transactions and net investments in certain foreign operations. In order to limit foreign currency exchange rate risks associated with forecasted, foreign currency denominated intercompany transactions, we may enter into cross-currency interest rate swaps. In order to limit foreign currency exchange rate risks associated with net investments in foreign operations, we may enter into foreign currency forward contracts. We may also use derivative financial instruments to reduce earnings volatility associated with other derivative financial instruments that are not designated as cash flow hedges. We do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes.

Derivative financial instruments are measured at fair value and recognized as assets or liabilities in the balance sheet. Changes in the values of the effective portions of derivative financial instruments designated as cash flow hedges and changes in the values of derivative financial instruments designated as economic hedges of net investments in foreign subsidiaries are reported as components of other comprehensive income (loss). Changes in the values of the ineffective portions of cash flow hedges and all changes in the values of undesignated derivative financial instruments are recognized in earnings. Amounts receivable or payable under interest rate cap and swap agreements designated as cash flow hedges are accounted for as adjustments to interest expense on the related debt.

 

F-81


Table of Contents

Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc.

Part I, Item 1: Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006

(unaudited)

 

To qualify for hedge accounting, the details of the hedging relationship must be formally documented at inception of the arrangement, including the risk management objective, hedging strategy, hedged item, specific risks that are being hedged, the derivative instrument and how effectiveness is being assessed. The derivative must be highly effective in offsetting either changes in fair value or cash flows, as appropriate, for the risk being hedged. Effectiveness is evaluated on a retrospective and prospective basis based on quantitative measures of correlation. When it is determined that a derivative has ceased to be highly effective as a hedge, we discontinue hedge accounting prospectively. In all situations in which hedge accounting is discontinued and the derivative remains outstanding, we will carry the derivative at its fair value on the balance sheet, recognizing subsequent changes in the fair value in current period earnings. Expenses recognized relating to changes in the time value of interest rate cap agreements were insignificant in 2006 and 2005.

Other comprehensive income (loss):

The following tables summarize components of other comprehensive income (loss):

 

     For the three months
ended June 30,
    For the six months
ended June 30,
 
     2006    2005     2006    2005  
     (in thousands)  

Net income (loss)

   $ 12,040    $ (693 )   $ 17,099    $ 4,563  

Other comprehensive income (loss):

          

Derivatives designated as hedges

     3,456      (11,003 )     14,273      (12,678 )

Currency translation adjustment

     10,151      (5,672 )     13,281      (9,112 )
                              

Total other comprehensive income (loss)

     13,607      (16,675 )     27,554      (21,790 )
                              

Total comprehensive income (loss)

   $ 25,647    $ (17,368 )   $ 44,653    $ (17,227 )
                              

The currency translation adjustment represents the net currency translation adjustment gains and losses related to our European subsidiaries and changes in fair values of currency related derivatives designated as hedges. Amounts are presented net of minority interests. As of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) included an accumulated gain of $4.8 million and an accumulated loss of $9.5 million, respectively, related to derivative transactions. Additionally, accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) included a cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment gain of $9.2 million and a loss of $4.1 million as of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively.

Financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity: The minority interests associated with certain of our consolidated joint ventures and our subsidiaries that have finite lives under the terms of the partnership agreements represent mandatorily redeemable interests as defined in SFAS No. 150. As of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, the aggregate book value of these minority interests in finite-lived entities on our condensed consolidated balance sheet was $130.7 million and $105.3 million, respectively. We believe that the estimated aggregate settlement value of these interests was approximately $267.7 million and $213.2 million, respectively. These amounts are based on the estimated liquidation values of the assets and liabilities and the resulting proceeds that we would distribute to our joint venture partners assuming dissolution as of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively. As required under the terms of the respective partnership agreements, subsequent changes to the estimated fair value of the assets and liabilities of the consolidated joint ventures will affect our estimate of the aggregate settlement value. The partnership agreements do not limit the amount to which the minority partners would be entitled in the event of liquidation of the assets and liabilities and dissolution of the respective partnerships.

 

F-82


Table of Contents

Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc.

Part I, Item 1: Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006

(unaudited)

 

Recent accounting pronouncements:

Stock-based compensation expense: At June 30, 2006, we have stock-based employee compensation plans, which are described more fully in Note 10 to the condensed consolidated financial statements. Prior to January 1, 2006, we accounted for those plans under the recognition and measurement provisions of APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” (APB 25), and related Interpretations, as permitted by SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (SFAS 123).

Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted SFAS No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment,” (SFAS 123R), using the modified-prospective-transition method. Under that transition method, compensation costs recognized in 2006 include: (a) compensation cost for all share-based awards granted prior to, but not yet vested as of January 1, 2006, which is estimated in accordance with the original provisions of SFAS 123 for (i) “equity awards” (as defined in SFAS 123R) based on the grant date fair value, and for (ii) “liability awards” based on the balance sheet date fair value, and (b) compensation cost for all share-based awards granted subsequent to January 1, 2006, based on the grant date or balance sheet date fair value, as applicable, estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123R. Stock-based compensation expense recognized during the period is based on the value of the portion of stock-based payment awards that is ultimately expected to vest. Expense recognized in 2006, therefore, was reduced for estimated forfeitures. Estimated forfeitures are adjusted at least annually if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. Results for prior periods have not been restated pursuant to SFAS 123R. (See Note 10.)

Prior to January 1, 2006, stock-based compensation recognized in our statement of income was based on the grant date fair value of restricted shares of Shurgard’s common stock, and the intrinsic value of stock options and stock appreciation rights granted to employees of our European subsidiary. Under APB 25 we did not recognize stock-based compensation cost related to stock options that had an exercise price equal to the market value of Shurgard’s common stock on the date of grant. Prior to adoption of SFAS 123R, the value of stock options was estimated for purposes of pro forma disclosure using the Black-Scholes option-pricing formula and amortized to pro forma expense ratably over the options’ vesting periods. Pre-vesting forfeitures were recognized as incurred through cumulative reversal of previously reported compensation expense.

Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123R, tax benefits of deductions resulting from the exercise of stock options or vesting of restricted share awards were presented as operating cash flows in the Statement of Cash Flows. SFAS 123R requires the cash flows resulting from the tax benefits from tax deductions in excess of the compensation cost recognized for those share based payments (excess tax benefits) to be classified as financing cash flows. Due primarily to our status as a REIT, no excess tax benefit was recognized during the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2006 or 2005.

In June 2006, the FASB issued FIN 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes,” which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. This interpretation also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. FIN 48 is effective for Shurgard beginning January 1, 2007. We have not completed our evaluation of the impact of adopting FIN 48 on our financial position, operating results or cash flows in 2007.

In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155, “Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments,” which: (1) permits fair value remeasurement for any hybrid financial instrument that contains an embedded

 

F-83


Table of Contents

Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc.

Part I, Item 1: Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006

(unaudited)

 

derivative that otherwise would require bifurcation, (2) clarifies which interest-only strips and principal-only strips are not subject to the requirements of SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” (3) establishes a requirement to evaluate interests in securitized financial assets to identify interests that are freestanding derivatives or that are hybrid financial instruments that contain an embedded derivative requiring bifurcation, (4) clarifies that concentrations of credit in the form of subordination are not embedded derivatives and (5) amends SFAS No. 140 “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities a replacement of FASB Statement 125” to eliminate the prohibition of a qualifying special-purpose entity from holding a derivative financial instrument that pertains to a beneficial interest other than another derivative financial instrument. SFAS No. 155 is effective for Shurgard beginning January 1, 2007. We do not believe that the adoption of SFAS No. 155 will have a material impact on our financial position, operating results or cash flows.

In October 2005, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) FAS 13-1 “Accounting for Rental Costs Incurred during a Construction Period,” which is effective for lease agreements entered into after January 1, 2006. This FSP clarifies that rental costs incurred during the period of construction of an asset on leased property should not be capitalized; rather they should be recognized as rental expense in the same manner as rental costs incurred after the construction period. However, to the extent a lessee accounts for rental of real estate projects under SFAS No. 67, “Accounting for Costs and Initial Rental Operations of Real Estate Projects,” it should continue capitalizing rental costs incurred during the period of construction. We lease under operating leases certain parcels of land and buildings on which we develop storage centers or perform certain construction improvements. We have historically capitalized rental costs during the construction period on such properties. We account for real estate projects involving our development and construction of self-storage facilities under SFAS No. 67; therefore, the adoption of this FSP did not have a material impact on our financial position, operating results or cash flows.

In June 2005, the FASB issued EITF Issue No. 04-5, “Determining Whether a General Partner, or the General Partners as a Group, Controls a Limited Partnership or Similar Entity When the Limited Partners Have Certain Rights.” In light of guidance provided in FIN 46R regarding “kick-out” rights in the context of evaluating variable interests and consolidation of VIEs, EITF 04-5 clarifies when a sole general partner should consolidate a limited partnership. EITF 04-5 provides authoritative guidance for purposes of assessing whether a limited partner’s rights are important rights that, under SOP 78-9, might preclude a general partner from consolidating a limited partnership. We adopted EITF 04-5 effective July 1, 2005, to account for our general partner interests in any new limited partnerships formed and for existing limited partnerships for which the partnership agreements are modified. For all other limited partnerships in which Shurgard is the general partner, we adopted the guidance in EITF 04-05 effective January 1, 2006. The adoption of EITF 04-05 did not have a material effect on our financial position, operating results or cash flows.

Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted SFAS No. 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections—a replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3,” which was issued in May 2005. This statement replaces APB Opinion No. 20, “Accounting Changes,” and SFAS No. 3, “Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements,” and changes the requirements for the accounting for and reporting of a voluntary change in accounting principle. It also applies to changes required by an accounting pronouncement in the instance that the pronouncement does not include specific transition provisions. APB Opinion No. 20 previously required that most voluntary changes in accounting principle be recognized by including in net income of the period the cumulative effect of changing to the new accounting principle. SFAS No. 154 requires retrospective application of changes in accounting principle to prior periods’ financial statements, unless it is impracticable to

 

F-84


Table of Contents

Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc.

Part I, Item 1: Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006

(unaudited)

 

determine either the period-specific effects or the cumulative effect of the change. Adoption of this standard had no impact on our financial position, operating results or cash flows.

Note 3—Variable Interest Entities

Under FIN 46R, a VIE must be consolidated by a company if that company is subject to a majority of the expected losses from the VIE’s activities or entitled to receive a majority of the VIE’s residual returns or both. FIN 46R also requires disclosures about VIEs that a company is not required to consolidate, but in which it has a significant variable interest. We adopted FIN 46R as of January 1, 2004.

Prior to June 30, 2005, we had direct and indirect ownership interests in Shurgard Self Storage SCA (Shurgard Europe) of 87.23%. We assessed Shurgard Europe under the provisions of FIN 46R and concluded that it met the definition of a VIE. We also concluded that we were the primary beneficiary effective as of June 2003. As a result, we began consolidating Shurgard Europe in our financial statements beginning January 1, 2004. On June 30, 2005, we acquired the remaining 12.77% ownership interests. Accordingly, as of June 30, 2005, Shurgard Europe became a wholly-owned subsidiary and is no longer a VIE.

Shurgard Europe has created two joint venture entities: First Shurgard SPRL (First Shurgard) formed in January 2003 and Second Shurgard SPRL (Second Shurgard) formed in May 2004. Those joint ventures are expected to develop or acquire up to approximately 75 storage facilities in Europe. Shurgard Europe has a 20% interest in each of these ventures. We have also determined that First Shurgard and Second Shurgard are each VIEs, of which Shurgard Europe is the primary beneficiary. Accordingly, First Shurgard has been consolidated in our financial statements since January 1, 2004, and Second Shurgard has been consolidated since inception. At June 30, 2006, First Shurgard and Second Shurgard had aggregate total assets of $424.3 million, total liabilities of $268.1 million, and credit facilities collateralized by assets with net book value of $396.0 million (see Note 7). As of June 30, 2006, First Shurgard’s and Second Shurgard’s creditors had no recourse to the general credit of Shurgard or Shurgard Europe other than Shurgard’s commitment to subscribe to up to $20 million and an additional €7.5 million ($9.4 million as of June 30, 2006) in preferred bonds in order for First Shurgard to fulfill its obligations under its senior credit agreement. We have an option to put 80% of the bonds issued by First Shurgard to Crescent Euro Self Storage Investments, Shurgard Europe’s partner in the joint venture.

In October 2004, Self-Storage Securitisation B.V. (Securitisation BV), a Dutch limited liability entity in which Shurgard and its subsidiaries have no ownership interest, was formed to issue €325 million in floating rate investment grade bonds. This entity receives interest from Shurgard Europe under a note of a similar amount payable by Shurgard Europe and holds certain derivative instruments to hedge its interest rate exposure on the bonds. We determined that Securitisation BV is a VIE of which Shurgard Europe is the primary beneficiary based on the activity of this entity and due to the fact that the notes issued by Securitisation BV are collateralized by assets of Shurgard Europe. This entity has been consolidated since inception.

We do not believe that any of our other investees, in which we would not hold a majority voting interest, are VIEs under the provisions of FIN 46R.

 

F-85


Table of Contents

Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc.

Part I, Item 1: Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006

(unaudited)

 

Note 4—Storage Centers and Acquisitions

The following table summarizes the components of our operating storage centers:

 

     June 30,
2006
   December 31,
2005
     (in thousands)

Land

   $ 714,007    $ 675,379

Building

     2,607,017      2,487,831

Equipment & Other

     81,629      81,048
             
   $ 3,402,653    $ 3,244,258
             

Storage centers activity

During the six-month period ended June 30, 2006, we acquired third party interests in certain of our domestic joint ventures, we acquired ten new storage centers (one of which was held for sale as of June 30, 2006), opened six new storage centers and completed two redevelopment projects on existing storage centers. In March 2006, we reevaluated and canceled the disposition plans of two storage centers that were classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2005, at an aggregate carrying value of $2.2 million, and we reclassified them to operating storage centers.

In 2006, we sold three parcels of land for total proceeds of $3.4 million for an aggregate gain of $60,000 for the six-month period ended June 30, 2006. One of these properties was held for sale at December 31, 2005, at a carrying value of $2.2 million.

Construction in progress at June 30, 2006, consisted primarily of ten storage centers under construction, of which six were located in Europe and four were located in the United States, and redevelopment projects for seven existing storage centers in the United States.

Acquisitions

On June 28, 2006, we acquired the minority interests held by one of our partners in seven joint ventures holding nine storage centers. As a result of this transaction five of these joint ventures became wholly-owned. We acquired the minority interests for cash of $2.4 million and forgiveness of our joint venture partner’s $260,000 accumulated minority interest receivable balance. The $2.7 million total consideration was allocated to the storage centers and related assets acquired.

On January 23, 2006, we completed the acquisition of 3S Self-Storage Systems SAS, a company that operates nine self-storage facilities in various metropolitan areas in France where we already have operating properties. 3S Self-Storage Systems SAS owns six of the facilities and leases the other three under operating leases. We completed the acquisition through Second Shurgard, our 20% owned European joint venture for total cash consideration and acquisition costs of approximately $47.4 million. We financed the acquisition with $20.0 million from draws on Second Shurgard’s credit facility and the remainder with Second Shurgard’s cash from equity contributions provided by us and our 80% joint venture partner. We incorporated the results of operations of the acquired entity in our condensed consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition.

 

F-86


Table of Contents

Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc.

Part I, Item 1: Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006

(unaudited)

 

This acquisition was accounted for as a purchase transaction. The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition (in thousands):

 

Receivables and other assets (1)

   $ 4,965  

Property held for sale

     2,547  

Operating storage centers

     42,524  
        

Total assets acquired

     50,036  
        

Accounts payable and other liabilities assumed

     (2,591 )
        

Net assets acquired

   $ 47,445  
        

(1) Receivables and other assets include an operating lease related intangible of $880,000 that is amortized over the remaining period of the lease.

Additionally, in March 2006, we acquired a self-storage center in France for cash of $3.1 million.

Note 5—Other Assets and Accounts Payable and Other Liabilities

The following table presents the components of other assets:

 

     June 30, 2006    December 31, 2005
     (in thousands)

Financing costs, net of accumulated amortization of $27,525 in 2006 and $22,852 in 2005

   $ 31,625    $ 34,121

Trade receivable, net of allowance of $5,479 in 2006 and $4,681 in 2005

     17,420      14,964

Prepaid expenses

     16,426      14,751

Software costs, net of accumulated amortization of $4,039 in 2006 and $3,056 in 2005

     16,024      14,638

Notes receivable

     14,228      13,868

Other accounts receivable

     14,400      10,958

Derivatives—assets (see Note 8)

     9,770      4,709

Non-competition, trademark and management agreements, net of accumulated amortization of $10,771 in 2006 and $9,827 in 2005

     3,242      4,186

Other assets, net of accumulated amortization of $1,801 in 2006 and $1,575 in 2005

     8,903      7,053
             

Total other assets

   $ 132,038    $ 119,248
             

 

F-87


Table of Contents

Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc.

Part I, Item 1: Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006

(unaudited)

 

The following table presents the components of accounts payable and other liabilities:

 

     June 30, 2006    December 31, 2005
     (in thousands)

Accounts payable

   $ 12,719    $ 17,937

Accrued real estate taxes

     13,812      12,652

Accrued personnel cost

     16,202      15,711

Accrued interest

     16,195      15,330

Prepaid revenue and deposits

     34,321      28,641

Taxes payable (1)

     20,483      15,765

Accrued expense related to proposed merger

     360      11,350

Derivatives—liabilities (see Note 8)

     9,436      23,997

Other accrued expenses and liabilities

     30,346      40,052
             

Total accounts payable and other liabilities

   $ 153,874    $ 181,435
             

(1) Consists of value added tax, franchise tax, income tax and sales and use tax.

Note 6—Lines of Credit

The following table summarizes our lines of credit:

 

     June 30,
2006
   December 31,
2005
   Weighted
Average
interest rate
at June 30,
2006
    Weighted
Average
interest rate at
December 31,
2005
 
     (in thousands)  

Unsecured domestic line of credit

   $ 276,700    $ 233,500    6.18 %   5.46 %

Unsecured domestic term loan credit facility

     350,000      350,000    6.28 %   5.76 %
                          
   $ 626,700    $ 583,500    6.24 %   5.64 %
                          

As of June 30, 2006, we had an unsecured domestic credit agreement, which includes a revolving credit facility with a group of banks to borrow up to $350 million and a $350 million term loan facility, that matures in February 2008. The revolving credit facility can be extended for one year at our option for a fee. The revolving credit facility and the term loan require monthly interest payments at LIBOR plus 0.90% and LIBOR plus 1.10%, respectively, at June 30, 2006. These rates can range from LIBOR plus 0.60% to LIBOR plus 1.15% for the revolving credit facility and from LIBOR plus 0.75% to LIBOR plus 1.50% for the term loan facility based on the ratings assigned to our senior unsecured long-term debt securities. As of June 30, 2006, availability under the revolving credit facility was $69.8 million, net of commitments on outstanding letters of credit of $3.5 million.

The domestic credit agreement requires us to maintain quarterly maximum total debt and secured debt to gross asset value ratios and minimum adjusted EBITDA to fixed charges and unencumbered net operating income to unsecured interest expense ratios. The financial covenants also require us to maintain a minimum tangible net worth. A breach of these covenants and other various covenants may result in an acceleration of the maturity of amounts outstanding. The domestic credit agreement restricts our distributions to a maximum of 105% of Adjusted Funds from Operations (Adjusted FFO) for up to four consecutive quarters; after that it must not exceed 95% of Adjusted FFO. Adjusted FFO is defined in the domestic credit agreement as (i) net income

 

F-88


Table of Contents

Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc.

Part I, Item 1: Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006

(unaudited)

 

(calculated in accordance with GAAP) excluding non-recurring gains and losses on or from operating properties; plus (ii) depreciation and amortization; and after adjustments for unconsolidated subsidiaries. Adjusted FFO excludes the effects of charges and costs associated with the proposed merger. Contributions to Adjusted FFO from unconsolidated subsidiaries are reflected in Adjusted FFO in proportion to our share of such unconsolidated subsidiaries. The quarterly distributions did not reach 95% of the Adjusted FFO in 2005 or 2006. As of June 30, 2006, we were in compliance with these financial covenants.

Note 7—Notes Payable

 

     June 30, 2006(1)     December 31, 2005  
     (in thousands)  

Domestic Notes Payable (1)

    

5.875% senior unsecured notes due in 2013

   $ 200,000     $ 200,000  

7.75% senior unsecured notes due in 2011

     200,000       200,000  

7.625% senior unsecured notes due in 2007

     50,000       50,000  

Fixed rate mortgage notes payable

     165,817       167,331  

Maturity dates range from 2006 to 2015

    

Interest rates range from 4.95% to 8.9%

    

Variable rate mortgage notes payable

     81,576       81,410  

Maturity dates range from 2006 to 2010

    

Interest rates range from 6.63% to 8.25%

    

European Notes Payable (1)

    

Collateralized €325 million notes payable due in 2011

     407,829       384,889  

Interest rate of 3.33% (EURIBOR + 0.51%)

    

First Shurgard and Second Shurgard

     243,694       185,931  

Senior credit agreements

    

Maturity dates range from 2008 to 2009

    

Interest rate of 5.00% (EURIBOR + 2.25%)

    

Capital leases

     6,289       6,010  

Maturity dates range from 2011 to 2052

    

Interest rates range from 6% to 14%

    
                
     1,355,205       1,275,571  

Discount on domestic senior notes payable

     (567 )     (610 )

Premium on domestic mortgage notes payable

     682       759  
                

Total Notes Payable

   $ 1,355,320     $ 1,275,720  
                

(1) All maturities and interest rates are as of June 30, 2006.

First Shurgard and Second Shurgard have senior credit agreements denominated in euros to borrow, in aggregate, up to €272.5 million ($342.0 million as of June 30, 2006). As of June 30, 2006, the available amount under those credit facilities was, in aggregate, €78.3 million ($98.3 million). In January 2006, we amended Second Shurgard’s credit agreement so as to allow for borrowings of up to €21.9 million ($27.5 million as of June 30, 2006) to be used for acquisition of existing self-storage properties including properties under capital leases. Our draws under the First Shurgard and Second Shurgard credit facilities are determined on a development project basis, or on an acquisition project basis when applicable for Second Shurgard, and can be

 

F-89


Table of Contents

Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc.

Part I, Item 1: Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006

(unaudited)

 

limited if the completion of projects is not timely and if we have certain cost overruns. The credit facilities also require us to maintain a maximum loan to value of the collateral ratio and a minimum debt service ratio. As of June 30, 2006, we were in compliance with these financial covenants.

At June 30, 2006, we had two credit facilities with $4.7 million available for draw to develop two new domestic properties.

As of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, our notes payable were collateralized by storage centers with net book values of $1.51 billion and $1.42 billion, respectively.

We capitalized interest of $1.2 million and $760,000 for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, using a weighted-average rate of our credit facilities and senior notes payable. We capitalized interest of $2.2 million and $1.3 million for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

Note 8—Derivative Financial Instruments

We use derivative instruments to manage risks associated with movements in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. We report derivative financial instruments at fair value on our consolidated balance sheets; respective balances included in other assets and other liabilities were as follows:

 

     June 30,
2006
    December 31,
2005
 
     (in thousands)  

Assets

    

Debt-related contracts

   $ 8,210     $ 2,792  

Foreign currency exchange contracts

     1,560       1,917  
                
   $ 9,770     $ 4,709  
                

Liabilities

    

Debt-related contracts

   $ (5,409 )   $ (21,778 )

Foreign currency exchange contracts

     (4,027 )     (2,219 )
                
   $ (9,436 )   $ (23,997 )
                

Shurgard Europe has entered into an interest rate swap to effectively fix EURIBOR at 3.714% through October 2011 on €325 million of variable rate debt. This swap is designated as a cash flow hedge and was an asset of $3.3 million and $12.9 million liability at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively. Shurgard Europe has also entered into foreign currency exchange derivatives designated as cash flow hedges. These instruments were liabilities of $3.3 million at June 30, 2006 and liabilities of $1.7 million and assets of $940,000 at December 31, 2005. We had undesignated interest rate caps for interest rate changes between October 2011 and October 2014 that we entered into as part of Shurgard Europe’s bond issuance. Shurgard Europe’s interest rate cap was an asset of $4.4 million and $2.8 million at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively, and expires in October 2014. To offset the earnings impact of this cap, we sold two interest rate caps with terms, that combined, reciprocate those of Shurgard Europe’s cap. These caps were liabilities of $4.6 million and $3.0 million at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively.

First Shurgard has entered into interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges of interest payments on future borrowings under its credit facility. In June 2005, we determined that a swap had ceased to be an effective

 

F-90


Table of Contents

Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc.

Part I, Item 1: Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006

(unaudited)

 

hedge and no longer qualified for hedge accounting. Accordingly, we reclassified the remaining related accumulated other comprehensive loss to earnings. During the first quarter 2006, we reclassified $95,000 through earnings for this instrument that matured in March 2006. The weighted-average notional amounts and fixed pay rates of these swaps designated as cash flow hedges are as follows:

 

     2006     2007     2008  

Notional amounts (in millions)

   123.6     118.8     45.1  

Weighted-average pay rates

     3.7 %     3.8 %     3.8 %

The swap agreements represented liabilities of $720,000 and assets of $110,000 at June 30, 2006, and liabilities of $2.7 million at December 31, 2005.

First Shurgard has also entered into foreign currency exchange derivatives designated as cash flow hedges or economic hedges of net investments in subsidiaries outside the euro zone. These instruments, which mature in May 2008, were liabilities of $760,000 and $490,000 at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively. We recognized a loss of $400,000 and a gain of $290,000 in currency translation adjustment on our consolidated balance sheet for these derivatives for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. For the six-month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, we recognized a loss of $250,000 and a gain of $720,000 in currency translation adjustment, respectively, for these derivatives.

In connection with financing agreements, First Shurgard also entered into call options maturing on May 27, 2008 for the purchase of €15 million equating to $18.6 million at a fixed exchange rate. This transaction does not qualify for hedge accounting. These instruments were assets of $1.6 million and $970,000 at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively.

Second Shurgard has entered into interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges of interest payments on future borrowings under its credit facility. The weighted-average notional amounts and fixed pay rates of Second Shurgard’s interest rate swaps are as follows:

 

     2006     2007     2008     2009  

Notional amounts (in millions)

   91.4     123.3     125.2     69.3  

Weighted-average pay rates

     3.8 %     3.7 %     3.7 %     3.7 %

These swap agreements represented assets of $330,000 and liabilities of $50,000 at June 30, 2006, and liabilities of $3.1 million at December 31, 2005. In March 2006, we determined that one of these EURIBOR swaps with a €60 million notional amount no longer qualified for hedge accounting based on our methodology for determining hedge effectiveness. Effective April 3, 2006, we re-designated the swap as a cash flow hedge. As a result, for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2006, we recognized through earnings a gain of $90,000 and $390,000, respectively, representing the change in fair value of the swap from the date the hedge first fell out of effectiveness through when the instrument was re-designated as a hedge. Of this gain, 80% was allocated to our joint venture partner through minority interest expense. Furthermore, we are reclassifying the accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of minority interest of €50,000 ($60,000 at June 30, 2006) to earnings through the swap’s maturity.

 

F-91


Table of Contents

Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc.

Part I, Item 1: Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006

(unaudited)

 

Note 9—Shareholders’ Equity

We had the following activity with respect to common stock in the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005:

 

     Three months
ended June 30,
   Six months
ended June 30,
     2006    2005    2006    2005

Shares issued for acquisitions

   —      127,684    —      127,684

Shares issued for dividend reinvestment

   4,977    8,270    9,983    16,793

Shares issued for options exercised and employee stock purchase plan

   178,302    28,030    382,952    51,442

Restricted shares issued

   —      861    —      2,279

Shares retired

   —      5,549    —      5,549

Note 10—Stock-Based Compensation and Benefit Plans

Summary of stock compensation plans

We have several stock-based compensation plans that provide for the granting of options, as well as restricted stock awards, performance awards, stock unit awards and distribution equivalent rights. A more detailed description of these plans can be found in our 2005 annual report on Form 10-K. As of June 30, 2006, awards outstanding consisted of stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units and stock appreciation rights. Stock options are settled at exercise through the issuance of new shares; restricted stock is settled on date of grant through the issuance of new shares; restricted stock units are settled upon vesting through issuance of new shares; and stock appreciation rights are settled in cash. As of June 30, 2006, we had approximately 3.2 million authorized shares available for future grants under our 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan (2004 Plan).

Compensation expense

Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted the provisions of SFAS 123R using the modified prospective method as described in further detail in Note 2. Total stock-based compensation expense for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2006 was $1.6 million and $3.7 million, respectively, of which $880,000 and $1.8 million, respectively, related to stock options, $530,000 and $1.1 million, respectively, related to restricted stock and restricted stock units, and $230,000 and $710,000, respectively, related to stock appreciation rights. Of the $3.7 million compensation expense for the six-month period ended June 30, 2006, $200,000 relates to the effect of the requirement under SFAS 123R to recognize, on a fair value basis, compensation expense for certain awards that had previously been expensed based on the awards’ intrinsic value, net of the cumulative effect that resulted from applying estimated expected pre-vesting forfeitures. This $200,000 cumulative effect has been reported on our condensed consolidated statement of operations as a cumulative effect of change in accounting principle.

 

F-92


Table of Contents

Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc.

Part I, Item 1: Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006

(unaudited)

 

The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share if we had applied the recognition provisions of SFAS 123 to record stock-based compensation in all periods presented:

 

     Three months ended
June 30, 2005
    Six months ended
June 30, 2005
 
     (in thousands except per share data)  

Net (loss) income:

    

As reported

   $ (693 )   $ 4,563  

Add: Stock based compensation expense included in reported net income

     858       1,330  

Less: Pro forma stock based compensation expense

     (1,217 )     (2,079 )
                

Pro forma net (loss) income

   $ (1,052 )   $ 3,814  
                

Basic and diluted net loss per share:

    

As reported

   $ (0.08 )   $ (0.03 )

Pro forma

   $ (0.09 )   $ (0.05 )

As of June 30, 2006, we had $11.8 million of unrecognized compensation expense, net of estimated pre-vesting forfeitures, related to unvested awards under our stock-based compensation plans, of which $5.3 million relates to stock options, $4.9 million relates to restricted stock and restricted stock units and $1.6 million relates to stock appreciation rights. We expect to recognize the unrecognized compensation expense over a weighted-average period of 2.0 years.

Stock options

We estimate the fair value of stock option awards using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The fair value of option awards is expensed on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of the options. Expected volatility is based on historic volatility of our stock, adjusted for current trends. The risk-free interest rate is based on the yield curve of a risk free investment on the grant date with a maturity equal to the expected term of each award. We use historical data and trends in actual forfeitures to estimate pre-vesting forfeitures; compensation expense is recognized only for the portion of awards that is expected to vest. The expected term of awards is derived from historical experience under our stock-based compensation plans and represents the period of time that awards are expected to be outstanding.

U.S. stock options: As of June 30, 2006, we had approximately 2.44 million stock options outstanding that were issued to our employees and non-employee directors in the United States. Each stock option provides the recipient the right to purchase shares of our Class A common stock at the fair value of our Class A common stock as of the date of grant. Stock options have a ten-year term from the grant date and vest over a minimum of three years under the 2000 Long-Term Incentive Plan (2000 Plan) and a minimum of four years under the 2004 Plan with a vesting schedule determined by the plan administrator at the time of grant.

 

F-93


Table of Contents

Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc.

Part I, Item 1: Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006

(unaudited)

 

The fair value of options granted under our stock option plans is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with weighted-average assumptions as follows:

 

     Six months ended
June 30,
 
     2006     2005  

Dividend yield

     3.88 %     5.27 %

Expected volatility

     20 %     21 %

Risk free interest rate

     4.50 %     3.79 %

Expected life (in years)

     5.5       5.5  

Fair value per option

   $ 9.23     $ 5.27  

The following table summarizes changes in options outstanding under the plans:

 

     Number of
Shares
    Weighted
average
exercise
price
   Weighted
average
remaining
contractual term
   Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
                     (in thousands)

Outstanding, January 1, 2006

   2,817,587     $ 35.11    6.6 years    $ 60,862

Granted

   790     $ 58.33      

Forfeited

   (4,804 )   $ 51.88      

Exercised

   (374,377 )   $ 30.86      
              

Outstanding, June 30, 2006

   2,439,196     $ 35.74    6.2 years    $ 65,281
              

Exercisable, June 30, 2006

   1,569,030     $ 28.98    4.8 years    $ 52,595
              

Vested and expected to vest in the future, at June 30, 2006

   2,309,686     $ 34.98    6.0 years    $ 63,555
              

The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the three-month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 was $5.2 million and $370,000, respectively. During the six-month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 the total intrinsic value of options exercised was $12.1 million and $630,000, respectively. Intrinsic value is measured using the fair value of the stock at the date of exercise (for options exercised during the period) or at the specified date (for options outstanding), less the applicable exercise price.

Shurgard Self Storage SCA stock options: Certain of our key employees in Europe receive incentive stock options for shares in our subsidiary, Shurgard Europe, under our Shurgard Self Storage SCA European Share Plan (European Plan). These options have a ten-year contractual term, generally vest in full at the end of a three-year period from the grant date, and are generally forfeited if a recipient’s employment is terminated prior to maturity. Recipients of Shurgard Europe’s stock options may exercise options upon vesting and have the right to require Shurgard to repurchase the shares for cash at fair value after the recipient’s employment with Shurgard Europe terminates. As a result, the cumulative compensation expense is presented as a liability in our consolidated balance sheet and compensation expense recognized for these awards will equal the appreciation in the fair value of the underlying shares of Shurgard Europe over the exercise price of the option from the date of grant through the date of the redemption of the shares.

As of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, options for 4,143 and 4,152 shares, respectively, were outstanding under our European Plan with a weighted-average exercise price of $1,555 per share of Shurgard

 

F-94


Table of Contents

Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc.

Part I, Item 1: Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006

(unaudited)

 

Europe. At June 30, 2006, these options had a weighted-average remaining contractual term of 8.7 years and an aggregate intrinsic value of $1.1 million. Of the 4,143 options outstanding as of June 30, 2006, 228 were exercisable at a weighted-average exercise price of $1,192 per share; vested options had a remaining contractual term of 6.25 years and an aggregate intrinsic value of $140,000.

As of June 30, 2006, the fair value of Shurgard Europe’s stock options has been estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with weighted-average assumptions as follows:

 

     June 30, 2006  

Per-share fair value of Shurgard Europe stock

   $ 1,823  

Expected volatility

     20.0 %

Risk free interest rate

     4.2 %

Expected term (in years)

     4.7  

Dividend yield

     0.0 %

Fair value per option

   $ 631  

Restricted stock and restricted stock units

U.S. restricted stock and restricted stock units: We grant restricted shares and restricted stock units to key employees in the United States and in Europe under our 2000 Plan and 2004 Plan. Restricted shares entitle the grantees to all shareholder rights with respect to voting and receipt of dividends during the restriction period, except restricted stock may not be sold, assigned, transferred, pledged or otherwise disposed of prior to vesting. Awards generally vest ratably over five years. We recognize compensation expense for restricted shares and restricted share units on a straight-line basis over the vesting period based on the grant date fair value of a single share of our Class A common stock multiplied by the number of awards expected to vest. Generally, if a grantee’s employment is terminated prior to the end of the five-year period, the unvested shares will be forfeited.

The table below presents the activity for restricted shares and restricted stock units for the six-month period ended June 30, 2006:

 

     Restricted Stock    Restricted Stock Units
     Number
of Shares
    Weighted Average
Grant Date Fair
Value
   Number
of Units
    Weighted Average
Grant Date Fair
Value

Outstanding, January 1, 2006

     112,753     $ 44.53      —       $ —  

Granted

     —       $ —        20,102     $ 60.16

Vested

     (6,424 )   $ 43.24      —       $ —  

Forfeited

     —       $ —        (307 )   $ 60.16
                     

Outstanding, June 30, 2006

     106,329     $ 44.61      19,795     $ 60.16
                     

Weighted average remaining term (years)

     1.7          2.6    

Aggregate intrinsic value (in millions)

   $ 6.6        $ 1.2    

Total fair value of shares vested (in millions)

   $ 0.4        $ —      

Shurgard Self Storage SCA restricted stock units: We have granted 286 restricted stock units under our European Plan to certain key employees in Europe. These awards are paid in shares of Shurgard Europe and generally vest in full after three years from the date of grant. After the recipient’s employment with Shurgard

 

F-95


Table of Contents

Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc.

Part I, Item 1: Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006

(unaudited)

 

Europe has terminated, holders of these restricted stock units will have the right to require us to repurchase vested shares at fair value for cash. As a result, the cumulative compensation expense is presented as a liability in our consolidated balance sheet and total compensation expense recognized for these awards will equal the fair value of the underlying shares of Shurgard Europe at the date of the redemption of the shares. During the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2006, we recorded $50,000 and $150,000, respectively, of stock-based compensation expense for these awards. As of June 30, 2006, we estimate the value of these awards at $520,000 based on an estimated fair value of Shurgard Europe’s stock of $1,823 per share. The accrued liability as of June 30, 2006, included in our condensed consolidated balance sheet was $160,000; the unrecognized compensation cost was $360,000; the weighted-average remaining term was 2.1 years.

Stock appreciation rights

We grant stock appreciation rights to most of our employees in Europe under our Shurgard Europe Gain Sharing Plan (Gain Sharing Plan). Recipients are entitled to receive a payment at maturity based on the sum of the appreciation of our common stock and dividends paid over the vesting period. The rights generally vest in full at the end of a three-year term and are generally forfeited if a participant’s employment is terminated prior to maturity. Compensation expense is recognized in our financial statements ratably over the three-year vesting period, net of estimated pre-vesting forfeitures. Gain Sharing Plan awards are settled in cash when they vest. As a result, the compensation expense recognized over the vesting period for Gain Sharing Plan awards under SFAS 123R will equal the fair value (i.e., cash value) of an award as of the last day of the vesting period multiplied by the number of awards that are earned. We determine the fair value of stock appreciation rights using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model, using assumptions that are generally consistent with those we used in valuing U.S. stock options, plus dividend rights accrued for all rights outstanding. The expected term of stock appreciation rights is each award’s remaining contractual term. As of June 30, 2006, 142,510 stock appreciation rights were vested and expected to vest, which had a weighted-average remaining contractual term of 1.6 years, and an aggregate intrinsic value of $2.7 million.

Measurement of compensation costs for Gain Sharing Plan awards and stock options of Shurgard Europe

Grants to employees of our European subsidiary of both stock appreciation rights granted under our Gain Sharing Plan and stock options for shares of Shurgard Europe under our European Plan represent awards that are classified and accounted for as liabilities under SFAS 123R. Accordingly, SFAS 123R requires the quarterly compensation expense recognized during the vesting period to be based on the fair value of Shurgard Europe’s stock options and Gain Sharing Plan awards as of the end of the most recent accounting period. Prior to the end of the vesting period, compensation costs for these awards are based on the awards’ most recent fair values, determined as of the end of the accounting period, and the number of months of service rendered during the vesting period.

Modifications of stock-based compensation and benefit plans under our plan of merger

Under the terms of our proposed merger with Public Storage, all U.S. stock options outstanding (except for certain options issued to nonemployee directors) will become fully vested as of the consummation of the merger and will be converted into options to acquire shares of Public Storage common stock. Certain outstanding stock options granted to our nonemployee directors will terminate as of the consummation of the merger; for 20 days prior to the consummation of the merger, each nonemployee director will be entitled to exercise those options granted to such director, whether vested or unvested. Any outstanding restricted shares of Shurgard common

 

F-96


Table of Contents

Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc.

Part I, Item 1: Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006

(unaudited)

 

stock held by employees and nonemployee directors that were granted under our stock-based compensation plans will be converted into the number of shares of Public Storage common stock obtained by multiplying such number of restricted shares of Shurgard common stock by 0.82. In addition, each of our executive officers is a party to a senior management employment agreement that provides for payments in the event that the executive’s employment is terminated, within two and a half years after a business combination, including the consummation of the merger with Public Storage, either by the executive for good reason or by Shurgard for any reason other than death, disability or for cause.

Other stock compensation and benefit plans

As required by the Merger Agreement, our employee stock ownership plan (ESOP), which is part of our employee retirement savings plan, and our employee stock purchase plan (ESPP) were suspended as of March 6, 2006, the date of the Merger Agreement. In March 2006, we funded the ESOP contributions that were included in accrued compensation costs as of December 31, 2005, related to amounts earned by employees in 2005. For our ESOP, there will be no further funding in subsequent periods and, as a result, no related expense was incurred during the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2006. Related to our ESPP, we issued all shares during the first quarter of 2006 for employee contributions made from January 1, 2006 through March 6, 2006.

Note 11—Income Taxes

We conduct our domestic non-REIT activities primarily through TRSs. Our foreign non-REIT activities are primarily conducted through six European taxable TRSs.

The components of deferred tax assets for Shurgard’s taxable operations at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 are included in the table below. As of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, we had established a valuation allowance against the value of our net deferred tax assets. Our domestic TRSs have started to generate taxable income, which resulted in a reduction of our domestic deferred tax assets as of June 30, 2006 compared to December 31, 2005. However, given the history of losses of our domestic TRS and of our European operations, we have concluded that there is currently insufficient evidence to justify recognition of the benefits of these deferred tax assets on our books. At the time the transaction with Public Storage is consummated, it is possible that certain domestic and European net operating loss carryforwards could be lost in whole or in part.

 

     June 30,
2006
    December 31,
2005
 
     (in thousands)  

Domestic

   $ 9,143     $ 9,627  

Foreign

     106,248       95,062  
                

Net deferred tax asset before valuation allowance

     115,391       104,689  

Valuation allowance

     (115,391 )     (104,689 )
                

Net deferred tax asset

   $ —       $ —    
                

Note 12—Restructuring and Exit Costs

European cost reduction plan

In June 2005, when we acquired the remaining minority interest in Shurgard Europe, we announced a plan to change the management structure, including the consolidation of certain national offices, and recorded charges

 

F-97


Table of Contents

Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc.

Part I, Item 1: Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006

(unaudited)

 

associated with these activities, including termination benefits payable to certain involuntarily terminated employees and lease termination costs relating to certain leased office facilities that we ceased using in 2005. Under this plan, we also announced that we would undertake further cost reduction initiatives through the end of 2007. In 2005, we started implementing cost reductions by consolidating certain departments, and we reduced the number of positions in the operations management, real estate and finance groups in various countries. We record the charges related to these cost reduction initiatives as the various initiatives take effect. We also recognized a liability for lease termination costs based on the remaining rental payments under the lease less estimated market sublease payments we might receive should we sublease the space. The operating leases for facilities we have ceased to use expire in 2009. We expect to incur additional expenses in the second half of 2006 and in 2007 as we make further reorganization decisions. As of June 30, 2006, the following table summarizes costs incurred since June 2005 for our plan to change the management structure of Shurgard Europe:

 

     (in thousands)  

Exit costs for lease obligations

   $ 342  

Exit costs for severance

     2,021  

Payments made

     (1,738 )
        

Total accrued exit costs as of December 31, 2005

     625  

Exit costs for severance

     127  

Payments made

     (363 )

Effect of foreign exchange

     59  
        

Total accrued exit costs as of June 30, 2006

   $ 448  
        

Additionally, in the first quarter of 2006, we recorded a restructuring liability of approximately $190,000 related to the acquisition of 3S Self-Storage Systems SAS (see Note 4) which was included as part of the costs of the assets.

Containerized storage operations exit plans

In December 2001 and 2003, our board of directors approved exit plans to discontinue our containerized storage operations. In connection with these decisions, we accrued incremental costs expected to be incurred during the closing of the warehouses affected by our exit plan. As of June 30, 2006, we had a remaining liability of $450,000 for warehouse operating lease obligations through 2008. The liability is recognized at its fair value for the remaining lease rentals, reduced by estimated sublease rentals and is reevaluated periodically. As of June 30, 2006, we had entered into subleasing agreements for all seven warehouses, including some on a month-to-month basis.

Since 2001, we have incurred $5.5 million of exit costs related to containerized storage operations. During the six-month period ended June 30, 2006, we incurred $140,000 related to exit costs and we made payments of $470,000.

 

F-98


Table of Contents

Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc.

Part I, Item 1: Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006

(unaudited)

 

Note 13—Net Income (Loss) Per Share

The following summarizes the computation of basic and diluted net income (loss) per share for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005:

 

     Three months
ended June 30,
    Six months
ended June 30,
 
     2006     2005     2006     2005  
     (in thousands except share data)  

Results of operations—Numerator

        

Income (loss) from continuing operations

   $ 12,114     $ (865 )   $ 17,305     $ (2,196 )

Preferred distributions and other

     (3,035 )     (3,039 )     (6,072 )     (6,080 )
                                

Income (loss) from continuing operations available to common shareholders

     9,079       (3,904 )     11,233       (8,276 )

Discontinued operations

     (74 )     172       (6 )     6,759  

Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle

     —         —         (200 )     —    
                                

Net income (loss) available to common shareholders

   $ 9,005     $ (3,732 )   $ 11,027     $ (1,517 )
                                

Effect of dilutive stock based awards

   $ —       $ —       $ —       $ —    
                                

Weighted-average share amounts—Denominator

        

Basic weighted-average shares outstanding

     47,220       46,600       47,089       46,557  

Effect of dilutive stock based awards

     1,059       —         1,143       —    
                                

Diluted weighted-average shares outstanding

     48,279       46,600       48,232       46,557  
                                

Basic per share amounts

        

Income (loss) from continuing operations available to common shareholders

   $ 0.19     $ (0.08 )   $ 0.23     $ (0.18 )

Discontinued operations

     —         —         —         0.15  

Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle

     —         —         —         —    
                                

Net income (loss) available to common shareholders

   $ 0.19     $ (0.08 )   $ 0.23     $ (0.03 )
                                

Diluted per share amounts

        

Income (loss) from continuing operations available to common shareholders

   $ 0.19     $ (0.08 )   $ 0.23     $ (0.18 )

Discontinued operations

     —         —         —         0.15  

Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle

     —         —         —         —    
                                

Net income (loss) available to common shareholders

   $ 0.19     $ (0.08 )   $ 0.23     $ (0.03 )
                                

We have excluded the following non-dilutive stock options and unvested common stock awards for certain periods from the computation of diluted earnings per share, because the options’ exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the common shares or the Company incurred a loss from continuing operations available to common shareholders during the reporting period:

 

     Three and six months ended
     June 30, 2006    June 30, 2005

Number of options

   350,000    2.7 million

Exercise prices

   $55.87 to $58.33    $21.62 to $44.01

Expiration on or before

   January 2016    May 2015

Unvested common stock awards

   112,000    124,000

 

F-99


Table of Contents

Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc.

Part I, Item 1: Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006

(unaudited)

 

Note 14—Foreign Operations

We conduct our foreign operations through Shurgard Europe and other European subsidiaries. Our European revenues amounted to $39.9 million, or 29% of our total revenues, and $75.6 million, or 29% of our revenues, for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2006, respectively, compared to $30.9 million, or 26% of our total revenues, and $61.3 million, or 26% of our revenues, for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2005, respectively.

As a result of our international operations, we recorded a $380,000 foreign exchange gain and a $5.7 million foreign exchange loss for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. In the six-month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, we recorded a $500,000 foreign exchange gain and a $9.6 million foreign exchange loss, respectively.

We are exposed to foreign currency exchange risk related to intercompany debt with or between our European subsidiaries that is not denominated in the functional currency of the subsidiary or the investee. In connection with the acquisition of the remaining interest in Shurgard Europe, we reevaluated our plans and expectations with respect to repayment of certain intercompany debt with our European subsidiaries and determined that it is prospectively a long-term-investment as defined in SFAS No. 52, “Foreign Currency Translation.” Accordingly, commencing July 1, 2005, we have not recognized exchange gains or losses on the principal of such intercompany debt in our consolidated statements of operations. Rather, beginning July 1, 2005, we report these translation adjustments as a component of other comprehensive income (loss). As a result, we recorded a gain of $3.0 million and $4.4 million in the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2006, respectively, as a component of other comprehensive income (loss). We have residual foreign exchange gains of $330,000 and $450,000 related to intercompany debt during the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2006, respectively, compared to a loss of $5.1 million and $9.1 million during the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2005, respectively.

Note 15—Discontinued Operations

We have presented the results of operations and gains on sales of these storage centers as discontinued operations for all periods presented.

In 2006, we designated one European storage center as discontinued operations. This property has been held for sale since we acquired it in January 2006 as part of a business acquisition (see Note 4). During the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2006, we recognized a loss on discontinued operations of $70,000 and $6,000, respectively. We completed the sale of the storage center in July 2006 for proceeds of $2.8 million.

In 2005, we sold five storage centers and designated them as discontinued operations as we have no continuing involvements in these properties. Of these storage centers, two were sold in the first quarter of 2005 for aggregate proceeds of $14.1 million and at a gain of $6.4 million. We recognized revenues for these storage centers of $360,000 and $780,000 for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2005, respectively, and expenses of $190,000 and $450,000, respectively, for the same periods.

Note 16—Segment Reporting

Shurgard has four reportable segments: Domestic Same Store and New Store, and European Same Store and New Store. Our definition of Same Store includes existing storage centers acquired prior to January 1 of the

 

F-100


Table of Contents

Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc.

Part I, Item 1: Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006

(unaudited)

 

previous year, as well as developed properties that have been operating for a full two years as of January 1 of the current year. We project that newly developed properties will reach stabilization in approximately 24 to 48 months. New Store includes existing facilities that had not been acquired as of January 1 of the previous year, as well as developed properties that have not been operating a full two years as of January 1 of the current year.

These reportable segments allow us to focus on improving results from our existing real estate assets and renting up our new facilities. We evaluate each segment’s performance based on net operating income (NOI) and NOI after indirect and leasehold expenses. NOI is defined as storage center operations revenue less direct operating expenses and real estate taxes, but does not include any allocation of indirect operating expenses. Indirect operating expenses include certain shared property costs such as bank fees, regional management, purchasing, national contracts, personnel and marketing, as well as certain overhead costs allocated to property operations such as business information technology, legal services, human resources and accounting. Indirect operating expenses are allocated to storage centers based on the number of months in operation during the period and do not include internal real estate acquisition costs or abandoned development expenses.

The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies. There are no inter-segment sales and transfers. We do not allocate development and acquisition expense, depreciation and amortization, general, administrative and other, impairment, interest expense, interest income and other, net or minority interest to the segments.

 

F-101


Table of Contents

Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc.

Part I, Item 1: Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006

(unaudited)

 

The following tables illustrate the results of our Same Store and New Store reportable segments as of and for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005. Same Store includes all storage centers acquired prior to January 1, 2005, and developments opened prior to January 1, 2004. New Store represents all storage centers acquired after January 1, 2005, and developments opened after January 1, 2004. Other Stores include properties no longer in service, properties closed in the process of being redeveloped, properties held for sale or disposed properties in which we have no remaining ownership interest as of June 30, 2006:

 

Three months ended
June 30, 2006
  Domestic
Same Store
  Domestic
New Store
  Europe
Same Store
  Europe
New Store
    Other
Stores
    Discon-
tinued Stores
    Total
    (in thousands)

Storage center operations revenue

  $ 91,242   $ 3,994   $ 34,832   $ 5,097     $ —       $ —       $ 135,165

Direct operating expense

    29,896     1,605     13,998     4,373       74       (74 )     49,872
                                               

Net operating income (loss)

    61,346     2,389     20,834     724       (74 )     74       85,293
                                               

Indirect operating expense

    4,435     231     3,115     1,027       —         —         8,808

Leasehold expense

    1,053     176     685     419       —         —         2,333
                                               

Indirect and leasehold expense

    5,488     407     3,800     1,446       —         —         11,141
                                               

Net operating income (loss) after indirect and leasehold expense

  $ 55,858   $ 1,982   $ 17,034   $ (722 )   $ (74 )   $ 74     $ 74,152
                                               
Three months ended
June 30, 2005
  Domestic
Same Store
  Domestic
New Store
  Europe
Same Store
  Europe
New Store
    Other
Stores
    Discon-
tinued Stores
    Total
    (in thousands)

Storage center operations revenue

  $ 85,615   $ 1,589   $ 29,871   $ 1,032     $ 375     $ (364 )   $ 118,118

Direct operating expense

    28,643     845     14,166     1,692       133       (120 )     45,359
                                               

Net operating income (loss)

    56,972     744     15,705     (660 )     242       (244 )     72,759
                                               

Indirect operating expense

    4,726     153     4,354     713       26       (31 )     9,941

Leasehold expense

    1,029     31     576     6       —         —         1,642
                                               

Indirect and leasehold expense

    5,755     184     4,930     719       26       (31 )     11,583
                                               

Net operating income (loss) after indirect and leasehold expense

  $ 51,217   $ 560   $ 10,775   $ (1,379 )   $ 216     $ (213 )   $ 61,176
                                               
Six months ended
June 30, 2006
  Domestic
Same Store
  Domestic
New Store
  Europe
Same Store
  Europe
New Store
    Other
Stores
    Discon-
tinued Stores
    Total
    (in thousands)

Storage center operations revenue

  $ 178,825   $ 7,542   $ 66,955   $ 8,611     $ 98     $ (98 )   $ 261,933

Direct operating expense

    60,503     3,186     27,921     8,377       104       (104 )     99,987
                                               

Net operating income (loss)

    118,322     4,356     39,034     234       (6 )     6       161,946
                                               

Indirect expense

    9,184     459     5,739     1,897       —         —         17,279

Leasehold expense

    2,055     338     1,339     735       —         —         4,467
                                               

Indirect and leasehold expense

    11,239     797     7,078     2,632       —         —         21,746
                                               

Net operating income (loss) after indirect and leasehold expense

  $ 107,083   $ 3,559   $ 31,956   $ (2,398 )   $ (6 )   $ 6     $ 140,200
                                               

 

F-102


Table of Contents

Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc.

Part I, Item 1: Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006

(unaudited)

 

Six months ended
June 30, 2005
  Domestic
Same
Store
  Domestic
New
Store
  Europe
Same
Store
  Europe
New
Store
    Other
Stores
  Discon-
tinued
Stores
    Total
    (in thousands)

Storage center operations revenue

  $ 166,756   $ 2,242   $ 59,588   $ 1,753     $ 800   $ (783 )   $ 230,356

Direct operating expense

    57,964     1,388     29,375     3,344       312     (289 )     92,094
                                             

Net operating income (loss)

    108,792     854     30,213     (1,591 )     488     (494 )     138,262
                                             

Indirect expense

    9,157     244     8,852     1,298       66     (65 )     19,552

Leasehold expense

    2,158     66     1,179     6       —       —         3,409
                                             

Indirect and leasehold expense

    11,315     310     10,031     1,304       66     (65 )     22,961
                                             

Net operating income (loss) after indirect and leasehold expense

  $ 97,477   $ 544   $ 20,182   $ (2,895 )   $ 422   $ (429 )   $ 115,301
                                             

The following table reconciles the reportable segments’ direct and indirect operating expense to consolidated operating expense, for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005:

 

     Three months ended
June 30,
   Six months ended
June 30,
     2006    2005    2006    2005
     (in thousands)

Direct store operating expenses

   $ 49,872    $ 45,359    $ 99,987    $ 92,094

Indirect operating and leasehold expense

     11,141      11,583      21,746      22,961

Other operating

     497      870      871      1,835
                           

Operating expense

   $ 61,510    $ 57,812    $ 122,604    $ 116,890
                           

The following table reconciles the reportable segments’ NOI after indirect and leasehold expense per the table above to consolidated income from continuing operations for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005:

 

     Three months ended
June 30,
    Six months ended
June 30,
 
     2006     2005     2006     2005  
     (in thousands)  

NOI after indirect and leasehold expense

   $ 74,152     $ 61,176     $ 140,200     $ 115,301  

Other revenue

     1,089       1,350       1,931       2,736  

Other operating expense, net

     (497 )     (870 )     (871 )     (1,835 )

Real estate development expense

     (1,945 )     (2,713 )     (3,615 )     (5,643 )

Depreciation and amortization

     (26,342 )     (23,252 )     (52,265 )     (46,596 )

Impairment and abandoned project expense

     (255 )     (868 )     (800 )     (1,191 )

General, administrative and other

     (7,018 )     (10,914 )     (14,471 )     (18,943 )

Costs related to proposed merger

     (1,363 )     —         (2,828 )     —    

Interest expense

     (30,845 )     (25,485 )     (60,249 )     (49,610 )

Gain (loss) on derivatives, net

     418       (1,353 )     1,109       (1,712 )

Foreign exchange gain (loss)

     378       (5,715 )     503       (9,563 )

Interest income and other, net

     464       1,270       869       2,230  

Minority interest

     3,953       6,876       7,886       12,986  

Equity in earnings of other real estate investments, net

     —         12       —         33  

Income tax expense

     (75 )     (379 )     (94 )     (389 )
                                

Income (loss) from continuing operations

   $ 12,114     $ (865 )   $ 17,305     $ (2,196 )
                                

 

F-103


Table of Contents

Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc.

Part I, Item 1: Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006

(unaudited)

 

Note 17—Commitments and Contingencies

The following tables summarize our contractual obligations, commitments and contingent liabilities as of June 30, 2006:

 

     Payments due by period
     Total    2006    2007-2008    2009-2010    2011 and
beyond
     (in thousands)

Contractual Obligations

              

Lines of credit and notes payable

   $ 1,975,616    $ 6,966    $ 932,403    $ 96,443    $ 939,804

Capital and operating lease obligations

     245,469      6,319      21,815      17,611      199,724
                                  

Totals

   $ 2,221,085    $ 13,285    $ 954,218    $ 114,054    $ 1,139,528
                                  
     Amount of commitment expiration per period
     Total
amounts
committed
   2006    2007-2008    2009-2010    2011 and
beyond
     (in thousands)

Other Commercial Commitments & Contingent Liabilities

              

Development contract commitments (1)

   $ 50,686    $ 40,133    $ 10,455    $ 98    $ —  

Proposed merger advisory fees (2)

     12,900      12,900      —        —        —  

Commitment to purchase property (3)

     3,200      3,200      —        —        —  

Outstanding letters of credit and other (4)

     3,724      2,800      924      —        —  
                                  

Totals

   $ 70,510    $ 59,033    $ 11,379    $ 98    $ —  
                                  

(1) Includes costs to complete property development and redevelopment projects conducted with contractors. We computed the outstanding commitment based on total estimated project costs less costs incurred to date. This includes $13.7 million of development commitments on our 20% owned European joint ventures.
(2) Includes a commitment to financial advisors on the proposed merger with Public Storage. See further discussion below.
(3) Includes a commitment to purchase a parcel of land. As of June 30, 2006, the commitment to purchase the real estate property was contingent upon the seller satisfying certain conditions prior to closing.
(4) Includes primarily an outstanding letter of credit related to our insurance trust for workmen’s compensation and letters of credit related to properties under construction.

Legal proceedings

On March 7, 2006, a putative class action complaint was filed on behalf of our public shareholders in the Superior Court of the State of Washington, King County, against Shurgard and certain of its directors entitled Staer v. Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc. et al (case no. 06-2-08148-0). The complaint alleges, among other things, that our directors breached their fiduciary duties in connection with the approval of the Merger Agreement with Public Storage, by failing to properly value the Company and by failing to protect against alleged conflicts of interest arising out of certain directors’ interests in the transaction. Among other things, the complaint seeks an order enjoining Shurgard from consummating the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement. We intend to defend the action vigorously. We believe that our actions and the actions of our board of directors were

 

F-104


Table of Contents

Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc.

Part I, Item 1: Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006

(unaudited)

 

appropriate. We maintain directors and officers insurance, which may provide coverage, subject to certain deductibles, with respect to this matter. We cannot presently determine the potential total damages, if any, or the ultimate outcome of the litigation.

We are a defendant in litigation filed on September 17, 2002, in the Superior Court of California for Orange County styled as Gary Drake v. Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc. et al (Case No. 02CC00152). The complaint alleges that we misrepresented the size of our storage units, seeks class action status and seeks damages, injunctive relief and declaratory relief against us under California statutory and common law relating to consumer protection, unfair competition, fraud and deceit and negligent misrepresentation. The Court recently ruled that the class of potential members in this lawsuit is limited to our California customers. No class has yet been certified. It is possible that we may incur losses as a result of this litigation, but we currently do not believe that the range of such losses would be material to our financial position, operating results or cash flows. However, we cannot presently determine the potential total damages, if any, or the ultimate outcome of the litigation. We are vigorously defending this action.

On July 28, 2006, certain of our joint venture partners filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, Nashville Division, against Shurgard and Public Storage entitled Freeman Management Corporation et al v. Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc. and Public Storage, Inc. for breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duties and tortious interference with a contract in connection with the termination of certain of the joint venture agreements. The complaint seeks an order declaring that Shurgard is removed as manager of the joint ventures, which hold 11 storage centers, declaring that the management agreements executed with Public Storage are void and enjoining Shurgard from managing the joint ventures as well as compensatory and punitive damages. We cannot presently determine the ultimate outcome or potential loss, if any, of the litigation. We intend to defend the action vigorously.

In addition, from time to time we are subject to various legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of business. Although we cannot predict the outcomes of these proceedings with certainty, we do not believe that the disposition of these matters and the matters discussed above will have a material adverse effect on our financial position, operating results or cash flows. We expense legal costs on legal proceedings as incurred.

Proposed merger

On March 6, 2006, we entered into a Merger Agreement with Public Storage that contemplates that we will be merged with and into a subsidiary of Public Storage. Each outstanding share of our common stock will be converted into the right to receive 0.82 of a fully paid and non-assessable share of Public Storage common stock. In addition, in connection with the merger, we expect to redeem each outstanding series of our preferred stock in accordance with its terms. Holders of Shurgard’s stock options, restricted stock units and shares of restricted stock will receive, subject to adjustments, options exercisable for shares of Public Storage common stock, restricted stock units and restricted shares of Public Storage common stock, respectively.

Our board of directors and the board of directors of Public Storage have approved the Merger Agreement. The proposed merger is subject to our shareholders’ approval, Public Storage’s shareholders’ approval of the issuance of shares of Public Storage common stock to be used as merger consideration and other customary closing conditions. Public Storage filed a registration statement on Form S-4 relating to the Public Storage common stock issuable in connection with the merger, containing a joint proxy statement seeking the approvals necessary to consummate the merger and certain other approvals as described in a joint proxy statement/

 

F-105


Table of Contents

Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc.

Part I, Item 1: Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006

(unaudited)

 

prospectus. This registration statement became effective on July 24, 2006. As described in the joint proxy statement/prospectus, we will seek our shareholders’ approval of the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement at the special shareholders’ meeting scheduled for August 22, 2006. Similarly, Public Storage will seek its shareholders’ approval of the Merger Agreement at Public Storage’s annual meeting of shareholders on the same date.

We have made certain representations and warranties in the Merger Agreement and have agreed to certain covenants, including, among others, subject to certain exceptions, to permit our board of directors to comply with its fiduciary duties, and not to solicit, negotiate, provide information in furtherance of, approve, recommend or enter into any other acquisition proposal (as defined in the Merger Agreement).

The Merger Agreement contains representations and warranties that the parties have made to each other as of specific dates. The assertions embodied in those representations and warranties were made solely for purposes of the contract between the parties, and may be subject to important qualifications and limitations agreed to by the parties in connection with negotiating its terms. Moreover, the representations and warranties are subject to a contractual standard of materiality that may be different from what may be viewed as material to shareholders, and the representations and warranties may have been intended not as statements of fact, but rather as a way of allocating risk between the parties. This description of certain terms of the Merger Agreement does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the Merger Agreement, a copy of which is filed with our current report on Form 8-K dated March 7, 2006.

As of December 31, 2005, we had an accrued liability of $11.4 million for fees that were contingently due to our financial advisors in connection with the proposed merger with Public Storage and our review of strategic alternatives to such proposed merger. During the first quarter of 2006, we paid $10.5 million of these fees plus out of pocket expenses, which became due upon entering into the Merger Agreement on March 6, 2006. As of June 30, 2006, we had commitments to pay our financial advisors additional success fees totaling $12.9 million, which we will recognize when incurred contingent upon the consummation of our merger with Public Storage. Merger transaction related expenses of $1.4 million and $2.8 million recognized as incurred during the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2006, respectively, consisted primarily of legal fees and reimbursements of expenses.

Note 18—Related Party Affiliation

Charles K. Barbo, the chairman of our board of directors, indirectly owns a 0.5% ownership interest in a limited partnership known as Shurgard Institutional Fund L.P., a consolidated subsidiary of Shurgard. Shurgard owns a 99% interest in this entity. We expect to acquire the minority interests in this entity, including Mr. Barbo’s interest, in connection with the closing of the proposed merger.

Note 19—Subsequent Events

In accordance with the terms of the Merger Agreement, on July 23, 2006, we issued notice that we will redeem all outstanding shares of our 8.7% Series C cumulative redeemable preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share and all outstanding shares of our 8.75% Series D cumulative redeemable preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share, on August 22, 2006, provided that certain conditions in the Merger Agreement have been satisfied by that date. Our Series C and Series D cumulative redeemable preferred stock is redeemable at a redemption price of $25 per share.

 

F-106


Table of Contents

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF SHURGARD SELF STORAGE S.C.A.

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT

To the Shareholders of

Shurgard Self Storage SCA,

Brussels, Belgium

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Shurgard Self Storage, SCA. and subsidiaries (collectively “the Company”) as of December 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001 and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of three years in the period ended December 31, 2003. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001 and the results of its operations and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2003 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

As discussed in Note E, the accompanying 2002 and 2001 consolidated financial statements have been restated.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE

Reviseurs d’Entreprises SC s.f.d. SCRL

Represented by Daniel Kroes

/s/    DANIEL KROES

April 23, 2004

 

F-107


Table of Contents

SHURGARD SELF STORAGE S.C.A.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands)

(in U.S. dollars)

 

     Note    As of December 31,  
        2003    

2002

(as restated)

   

2001

(as restated)

 

ASSETS

         

Storage Centres:

         

Land

      $ 137,615     $ 83,297     $ 53,623  

Buildings & equipment, net

        400,397       279,570       171,321  

Construction in progress

        12,766       87,225       68,839  
                           

Total Storage Centres

   C      550,778       450,092       293,783  

Investment in and receivables from affiliates

   D      29,824       —         —    

Cash & cash equivalents

        11,965       24,978       15,324  

Deferred taxation

   E      —         —         —    

Other assets

   F      31,902       30,103       20,059  
                           

Total Assets

      $ 624,469     $ 505,173     $ 329,166  
                           

LIABILITIES & SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

         

Accounts payable and other liabilities

      $ 41,637     $ 35,617     $ 24,676  

Liabilities under capital leases

   G      11,391       9,469       7,838  

Bonds payable to an affiliated company

   H      57,287       49,623    

Line of credit

   I      376,553       270,936       174,506  

Subordinated loan payable to related party

   K      —         127,620       99,534  
                           

Total Liabilities

        486,868       493,265       306,554  
                           

Commitments and contingencies

   N       

Shareholders’ equity

   L       

General Partner Interest

         

€160.50 par value; 56 shares issued and outstanding in 2003 and 2002

        10       10       10  

Class A Limited Liability Partner Interest

         

€160.50 par value; 233,844 shares (2002: 97,733) issued and outstanding

        40,948       17,769       17,769  

Additional paid in capital

        118,653       30       30  

Profit Certificates: 219,234 (2002: 219,234) issued

        139,754       139,754       139,754  

Less: uncalled Profit Certificates

        (26,089 )     (26,089 )     (47,718 )
                           

Total shareholders’ interest

        273,276       131,474       109,845  

Accumulated loss

        (140,287 )     (110,421 )     (80,590 )

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

        4,612       (9,145 )     (6,643 )
                           

Total shareholders’ equity

        137,601       11,908       22,612  
                           

Total liabilities & shareholders’ equity

      $ 624,469     $ 505,173     $ 329,166  
                           

See Notes to consolidated financial statements

 

F-108


Table of Contents

SHURGARD SELF STORAGE S.C.A.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(in thousands)

(in U.S. dollars)

 

     For the year ended December 31,  
     2003    

2002

(as restated)

   

2001

(as restated)

 

Revenue

      

Real estate operations

   $ 67,318     $ 43,512     $ 26,526  

Other revenue

     11,376       —         —    
                        

Total revenue

     78,694       43,512       26,526  

Expenses

      

Operating expenses

     54,383       32,236       24,296  

Real estate taxes

     3,540       2,193       1,777  

Depreciation and amortization

     19,433       12,959       9,044  

General, administrative and other expenses

     6,181       4,798       3,425  
                        

Total expenses

     83,537       52,186       38,542  
                        

Net loss arising from operations

     (4,843 )     (8,674 )     (12,016 )
                        

Other Income (Expense)

      

Interest income and other

     1,520       620       482  

Interest and other charges

     (21,508 )     (13,863 )     (9,206 )

Interest expense on bonds payable to an affiliated company

     (6,889 )     (1,403 )     —    

Interest expense on subordinated loan payable to related party

     (7,774 )     (8,881 )     (7,750 )

Exchange translation gain on bonds payable to an affiliated company

     9,830       2,357       —    
                        

Net loss before taxation

     (29,664 )     (29,844 )     (28,490 )

Income tax (charge) benefit

     (202 )     13       —    
                        

Net loss before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle

     (29,866 )     (29,831 )     (28,490 )

Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle

     —         —         (1,106 )
                        

Net loss

   $ (29,866 )   $ (29,831 )   $ (29,596 )
                        

See Notes to consolidated financial statements

 

F-109


Table of Contents

SHURGARD SELF STORAGE S.C.A.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)

(in U.S. dollars)

 

          For the year ended December 31,  
     Note    2003    

2002

(as restated)

   

2001

(as restated)

 

Operating activities:

         

Net loss

      $ (29,866 )   $ (29,831 )   $ (29,596 )

Adjustments to reconcile earnings to net cash used in operating activities

         

Income tax charge (benefit)

        202       (13 )  

Share of loss of affiliate

        1,135       —         —    

(Gains) on disposal of property

        —         (257 )     (20 )

Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle

            1,106  

Derivative expense

        192       —         —    

Depreciation and amortization

        19,433       12,959       9,044  

Amortization of financing costs as interest expense

        4,651       3,268       2,706  

Exchange translation gain on bonds payable to an affiliated company

        (9,830 )     (2,357 )     —    

Interest and redemption premium accrued on bonds payable to an affiliated company

        6,889       539       —    

Subordinated loan payable to related party

   K      7,774       8,893       7,735  

Changes in operating accounts:

         

Receivables from affiliate

   D      (6,307 )     —         —    

Other assets

        2,202       (5,742 )     (1,016 )

Accounts payable and other liabilities

        1,630       4,608       7,429  
                           

Net cash used in operating activities

        (1,895 )     (7,933 )     (2,612 )
                           

Investing activities:

         

Payments for site acquisition and construction

        (79,459 )     (114,634 )     (104,889 )

Transfer of assets to affiliate

   D      44,139       —         —    

Proceeds of derivative contract

        2,283       —         —    

Investment in affiliate

   D      (22,357 )     —         —    

Proceeds of disposal of property

        —         4,216       43  

Payments for other intangible assets

        (768 )     (666 )     (470 )
                           

Net cash used in investing activities

        (56,162 )     (111,084 )     (105,316 )
                           

Financing activities:

         

Proceeds from issue of Profit Certificates

   L      —         21,837       38,339  

Proceeds from issue of Partner Interests

   L      7,316       —         —    

Proceeds from lines of credit

        45,494       57,188       76,678  

Proceeds from bonds payable to an affiliated company

        —         49,317       —    

Repayment of subordinated loan payable to related party

   K      (7,344 )     —         —    

Increase in liabilities under capital leases

        44       177       (54 )

Payment of financing and related costs

        (4,134 )     (3,207 )     (4,809 )
                           

Net cash provided by financing activities

        41,376       125,312       110,154  
                           

Net effect of translation on cash

        3,668       3,359       (664 )
                           

(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents

        (13,013 )     9,654       1,562  

Cash and cash equivalents at start of year

        24,978       15,324       13,762  
                           

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

      $ 11,965     $ 24,978     $ 15,324  
                           

Supplemental schedule of cash flow information:

         

Interest paid net of capitalization

      $ 10,114     $ 9,055     $ 6,315  
                           

Capital lease obligation incurred on site acquisition

      $ —       $ —       $ 5,989  
                           

Partner Interests issued for contribution in kind of subordinated loan payable to related party

      $ 135,548     $ —       $ —    
                           

Total amount of corporate income taxes paid

      $ 202     $ (13 )   $ —    
                           

See Notes to consolidated financial statements

 

F-110


Table of Contents

SHURGARD SELF STORAGE S.C.A.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(in thousands)

(in U.S. dollars)

 

     General
Partner
Interest
   Limited
Partner
Interest
and
profit
certificates
   Additional
paid-in
capital
   Accumulated
loss
    Accumulated
other
comprehensive
loss
    Total
shareholders’
equity
 

Balance January 1, 2001 (as restated)

   $ 10    $ 71,902    $ 30    $ (50,994 )   $ (6,392 )   $ 14,556  

Increase in shareholders’ interest

        37,903             37,903  

Comprehensive loss:

               

Net loss

              (29,596 )       (29,596 )

Other Comprehensive Income (loss):

               

Gain on derivative instruments

                900       900  

Foreign currency translation

              —         (1,151 )     (1,151 )
                                 

Total Comprehensive Loss:

     —        —        —        (29,596 )     (251 )     (29,847 )
                                             

Balance January 1, 2002 (as restated)

     10      109,805      30      (80,590 )     (6,643 )     22,612  

Increase in shareholders’ interest

        21,629             21,629  

Comprehensive loss:

               

Net loss

              (29,831 )       (29,831 )

Other Comprehensive Income (loss):

               

Loss on derivative instruments

                (2,483 )     (2,483 )

Foreign currency translation

              —         (19 )     (19 )
                                 

Total Comprehensive Loss:

     —        —        —        (29,831 )     (2,502 )     (32,333 )
                                             

Balance January 1, 2003 (as restated)

     10      131,434      30      (110,421 )     (9,145 )     11,908  

Increase in shareholders’ interest cash

        1,204      6,074          7,278  

Increase in shareholders’ interest non cash

        21,975      112,549          134,524  

Comprehensive loss:

               

Net Loss

              (29,866 )       (29,866 )

Other Comprehensive Income (loss):

               

Gain on derivative instruments

                1,795       1,795  

Foreign currency translation

              —         11,962       11,962  
                                 

Total Comprehensive Loss:

     —        —        —        (29,866 )     13,757       (16,109 )
                                             

Balance December 31, 2003

   $ 10    $ 154,613    $ 118,653    $ (140,287 )   $ 4,612     $ 137,601  
                                             

See Notes to consolidated financial statements

 

F-111


Table of Contents

SHURGARD SELF STORAGE S.C.A.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note A—Organization

Shurgard Self Storage S.C.A. (the Company) was incorporated under Belgian Law as a Société en Commandite Simple on December 8, 1994 and reorganized as a Société en Commandite par Actions on September 28, 1999. The Company invests directly or through wholly-owned subsidiaries in Belgium, the Netherlands, France, Sweden, Denmark, the United Kingdom and Germany (Collectively the “Group”) in the development and operation of self-service storage properties providing month-to-month leases for business and personal use.

Note B—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of presentation: These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America on the basis described below.

Consolidation: The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and all of its domestic and foreign subsidiaries and joint ventures in which the Company has effective control as evidenced by, among other factors, holding a majority interest in the investment and having the ability to cause a sale of assets. All investments in joint ventures that do not qualify for consolidation, but in which the Company exercise significant influence, are accounted for under the equity method (See Note D). All inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated upon consolidation.

Use of estimates: The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires the Group to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

New accounting principles: In November 2002, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation (FIN) 45, “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others,” which elaborates on the disclosures to be made by a guarantor in its interim and annual financial statements about its obligations under certain guarantees that it has issued. It also clarifies that a guarantor is required to recognize, at the inception of a guarantee, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee. The initial recognition and initial measurement provisions of FIN 45 are applicable on a prospective basis to guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002, irrespective of the guarantor’s fiscal year-end. The Group have not entered into any guarantees or modified any existing guarantees subsequent to December 31, 2002 and therefore adoption of this statement has had no effect on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation—Transition and Disclosure,” which amended SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”. SFAS 148 provides alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based compensation and amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS 123 to require prominent disclosures of the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method used on reported results. On December 31, 2002, the Group adopted the disclosure provisions of SFAS 148 and continues to account for stock-based compensation under APB Opinion No. 25 “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.” Therefore, the adoption of SFAS 148 did not have any effect on its financial position or results of operations. The following table reflects pro forma net income as if the Group had recognized stock-based compensation expense using the fair value method in accordance with SFAS 123. As the Group is a non-public

 

F-112


Table of Contents

SHURGARD SELF STORAGE S.C.A.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

entity, the fair value of options issued in 2003 and 2002 was calculated at their minimum value of $99 (2002: $78) per option granted, applying a risk free interest rate of 2.75% and 2.74%, respectively. All grants of options were made at fair market value and no compensation expense has been recorded in Net Loss for the year ended December 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001.

 

     Year ended December 31,
     2003    2002    2001
     (in thousands)

Net loss as reported

   29,866    29,831    29,596

Add: proforma compensation expense

   49    12    —  
              

Proforma net loss

   29,915    29,843    29,596
              

In January 2003, the FASB issued FIN 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities,” which clarifies the application of Accounting Research Bulletin 51, “consolidated financial statements”, for entities in which equity investors do not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties. FIN 46, as revised by FIN 46R in December 2003, becomes effective for variable interest entities for periods ending after March 15, 2004. The Group is in the process of determining whether First Shurgard SPRL, an entity newly formed in May 2003 (Note D), meets the definition of a Variable Interest Entity under the conditions outlined in FIN 46R.

In April 2003, the FASB issued SFAS 149, “Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” which amends and clarifies financial accounting and reporting for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, and for hedging activities. In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity” which requires that certain financial instruments previously accounted for as equity should be classified as liabilities in statements of financial position. In December 2003, the FASB issued a revised SFAS 132, “Employers’ Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits—an amendment of FASB Statements 87, 88 and 106”. Adoption of these statements has no effect on the Group’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities: The Group has adopted the requirements of SFAS 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”, as amended and interpreted, which establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts and for hedging activities. Under SFAS 133, certain contracts that were not formerly considered derivatives may now meet the definition of a derivative. SFAS 133 requires that all derivatives, whether designated in hedging relationships or not, be recorded on the balance sheet at fair value. The accounting for changes in fair value depends upon the purpose of the derivative instrument and whether it is designated and qualifies for hedge accounting. To the extent derivative instruments qualify and are designated as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of the gain or loss on such derivative instruments will generally be reported in Other Comprehensive Income (OCI) and the ineffective portion, if any, will be reported in net income. Such amounts recorded in accumulated OCI will be reclassified into net income when the hedged item affects earnings. To the extent derivative instruments qualify and are designated as hedges of changes in the fair value of an existing asset, liability or firm commitment, the gain or loss on the hedging instrument will be recognized currently in earnings along with the changes in fair value of the hedged asset, liability or firm commitment attributable to the hedged risk.

Foreign exchange: The consolidated financial statements are initially prepared in euro, the primary functional currency of the Group. Assets and liabilities of certain subsidiaries outside the euro zone, whose

 

F-113


Table of Contents

SHURGARD SELF STORAGE S.C.A.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

functional currencies are the local currencies of the countries in which they are located, are translated in accordance with SFAS 52, “Foreign Currency Translation”. In accordance with SFAS 52, assets and liabilities of such subsidiaries denominated in local currencies are translated into euro at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date and revenue and expenses are translated at average rates of exchange rate prevailing during the year. Gains or losses arising from such translation, together with gains or losses on translation of intercompany loans to such subsidiaries that are of a long-term nature, are accumulated in OCI as a separate component of shareholders’ equity.

For presentation, these financial statements have been translated into U.S. dollars. For this purpose, the consolidated balance sheet has been converted at the exchange rate in effect at the balance sheet date and the consolidated statement of operations has been translated at average rates of exchange. Gains or losses arising from this translation are also accumulated in OCI.

The Company has entered into contracts for the hedging of that proportion of investments made in currencies outside the euro through the forward sale of such currencies. In accordance with SFAS 133, the Company records such contracts on the balance sheet at market value. Changes in market values are recorded in OCI in the same manner as for the exchange translation of the related intercompany loans as above.

Gains or losses from transactions denominated in other currencies are included in the determination of net loss.

Storage Centers: Storage centers are recorded at cost. Depreciation on buildings is recorded on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives, on average over 30 years and equipment and leasehold improvements are depreciated over 5 years. Repair and maintenance costs are recognized in expense as incurred, unless the costs are incurred for the replacement of existing building infrastructures.

Valuation of long-lived assets: Whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of storage centers or other long lived assets might not be recoverable, the Group reviews the related assets for impairment using best estimates based upon reasonable and supportable assumptions and projections. The Group uses the expected cash flow method to determine if the net book value of the properties exceeds fair value less costs to sell. As at December 31, 2003, no such assets had been written down.

Cash and cash equivalents: Cash equivalents consist of money market instruments and securities with original maturities of 90 days or less.

Financing costs: Financing costs are amortized on the effective interest method over the life of the related debt (See Note I). The related expense is included in interest expense.

Revenue recognition: The majority of the Group’s customers rent under month-to-month lease agreements and revenue is recognized at the contracted rate for each month occupied. Revenue related to customers who sign longer period leases is recognized ratably over the term of the lease. Revenue from development fees in respect of stores developed on behalf of First Shurgard SPRL (See Note D) is recognized as earned to the extent of development costs incurred and stores opened, calculated on the basis set out in the joint venture agreements. Revenue from management fees in respect of the operation of those stores is recognized based upon the revenue of those stores.

Financial instruments: The carrying values reflected on the balance sheet at December 31, 2003 reasonably approximate the fair value of cash and cash equivalents, other assets, accounts payable, lines of credit and other liabilities.

 

F-114


Table of Contents

SHURGARD SELF STORAGE S.C.A.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Income taxes: The Group accounts for income taxes under the provisions of SFAS 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” SFAS 109 requires companies to account for deferred income taxes using the asset and liability method. Deferred taxation liabilities or assets are recognized for the estimated future tax effects, based upon enacted tax law, attributable to temporary differences in the timing of recognition of transactions for reporting and tax purposes. The measurement of deferred tax assets is reduced, if necessary, by the amount of any tax benefits that, based upon available evidence, are not expected to be realized.

Comprehensive income: The Group follows SFAS 130, “Reporting of Comprehensive Income”. SFAS 130 establishes rules for the reporting of comprehensive income and its components. Comprehensive income comprises net income, foreign currency translation adjustments and adjustments to market value of certain derivative instruments and is presented in the consolidated statements of shareholders’ equity and comprehensive income.

Segment information: The Group has adopted SFAS 131, “Disclosures About Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information”, which establishes annual and interim reporting standards for an enterprise’s business segments and related disclosures about products, services, geographic areas and customers. The segments adopted by the Group and related financial information are set out in Note O.

Environmental costs: Group policy is to accrue environmental assessments and/or remediation costs when it is probable that such efforts will be required and the related costs can be reasonably estimated. The majority of Group real estate facilities have undergone independent environmental investigations and Group policy is to have such investigations conducted on all new real estate acquired. Although there can be no assurance that there is no environmental contamination, the Group is not aware of any such contamination which individually or in aggregate would be material to its business, financial condition or results of operations.

Note C—Storage Centers

 

     2003     2002     2001  
     (in thousands)  

Land

   137,615     83,297     53,623  

Buildings

   437,094     299,857     177,551  

Properties under capital lease

   12,040     5,640     5,297  

Equipment and other

   16,089     11,249     8,675  
                  

Total property, plant & equipment

   602,838     400,043     245,146  

Less: accumulated depreciation

(Including $1,393,000 on leased assets)

   (64,826 )   (37,176 )   (20,202 )
                  
   538,012     362,867     224,944  

Construction in progress

   12,766     87,225     68,839  
                  

Net book value

   550,778     450,092     293,783  
                  

As at December 31, 2003, the Group had outstanding commitments under contracts for the acquisition and construction of new storage centers totaling $43,777,000. This amount includes the value of certain contracts for the acquisition of new properties, the completion of which are subject to conditions such as the achievement of planning consents. In 2003, 2002 and 2001, interest of $948,000, $2,149,000 and $1,927,000 respectively relating to the development of storage centers was capitalized.

 

F-115


Table of Contents

SHURGARD SELF STORAGE S.C.A.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Note D—Investment in and Receivables from Real Estate Affiliate

This comprises:

 

     December 31,
2003
 
     (in thousands)  

Investment in affiliates

   23,615  

Amounts receivable from affiliates

   7,344  

Less: share of losses of affiliates

   (1,135 )
      
   29,824  
      

The investment comprises an investment in a 20% interest in the registered capital of First Shurgard SPRL (First Shurgard), a Belgian entity formed in May 2003, together with a 5.2% direct interest in one of its subsidiaries, First Shurgard Deutschland GmBH. These entities were formed under a joint venture agreement with Crescent Euro Self Storage Investments SARL (Crescent) for the development of up to 38 storage centers in the Group’s European markets. During the year, the Group transferred ten properties under development into the joint venture at their cost of $44,139,000 plus reimbursement of interest carry cost of $1,283,000, included in Interest Income in the consolidated statements of operations.

First Shurgard has equity commitments of €20,000,000 (Equivalent to $25,104,000 at December 31, 2003) from the Group and €80,000,000 (Equivalent to $100,414,000 at December 31, 2003) from Crescent, of which €15,981,000 (equivalent to $20,059,000 at December 31, 2003) remains to be drawn, and has obtained a non-recourse five year debt facility for €140,000,000 (equivalent to $175,725,000 at December 31, 2003) from a group of commercial banks. Under the terms of this debt facility, a subsidiary of First Shurgard entered into a Subscription Agreement with Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc. (Shurgard) under which Shurgard irrevocably agreed to subscribe to subordinated and unsecured registered bonds in the aggregate principal amount of up to $20,000,000. This commitment may be reduced if certain financial covenants are met and otherwise terminates not later than July 25, 2009. These bonds may generally only be drawn down either to avoid an imminent default or in the event of a default and so applied to repay amounts due under the credit agreement.

Under the joint venture agreement, the Group is responsible for the acquisition and construction of sites on behalf of First Shurgard for which First Shurgard pays development fees equal to 7% of the cost of developed storage centers, together with reimbursement of certain out-of-pocket costs and certain other initial fees in connection with capital raising. In addition, the Group has entered into a 20-year management agreement for the operation of First Shurgard stores, for which the Group receives management fees equal to 7% of revenues subject to a minimum of €50,000 (equivalent to $63,000 at December 31, 2003) per year per store, together with certain other fixed fees. In the year ended December 31, 2003, the Group received a total of $12,108,000 in development and initial fees and $403,000 in management fees from First Shurgard, which amounts are included in Other Revenue in the consolidated statement of operations, net of the Group’s share of losses of those affiliates of $1,135,000.

Store personnel of First Shurgard stores are employed either directly by the Group or under joint employment contracts between the Group and First Shurgard. First Shurgard reimburses to the Group the personnel costs of these employees, amounting in total to $801,000 in the year ended December 31, 2003.

The joint venture agreement also provides that, in addition to its initial 20% ownership interest, the Group will receive an additional 20% of First Shurgard’s income and cash flow after each of the investors has received an internal rate of return of 12% on its equity investment. First Shurgard owns the developed storage centers

 

F-116


Table of Contents

SHURGARD SELF STORAGE S.C.A.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

subject to the management agreements. Although the Group has no obligation to purchase the properties, if they are put up for sale, it has a right of first offer at fair market value.

Below is summarized financial information for First Shurgard and its subsidiary companies:

First Shurgard

Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheet

 

     December 31,
2003
     ($000)

ASSETS

  

Storage centers:

  

Land

   38,201

Buildings and equipment, net

   79,887

Construction in progress

   13,952
    

Total storage centers

   132,040

Cash and cash equivalents

   20,951

Other assets

   21,998
    

Total assets

   174,989
    

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

  

Accounts payable and other liabilities

   11,618

Amounts payable to Shurgard Europe

   7,344

Line of credit

   55,228
    

Total liabilities

   74,190
    

Minority interest

   948
    

Shareholders’ equity

   99,851
    

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

   174,989
    

 

F-117


Table of Contents

SHURGARD SELF STORAGE S.C.A.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

First Shurgard

Unaudited Consolidated Statement of Operations

 

     December 31,
2003
 
     $’000  

Revenue

  

Rental revenue

   596  
      

Total revenue

   596  
      

Expenses

  

Operating

   3,647  

Real estate taxes

   66  

Depreciation and amortization

   660  

General, administrative and other

   1,416  
      

Total expenses

   5,789  
      

Loss from operations

   (5,193 )

Interest expense

   (177 )

Minority interest

   63  
      

Net loss

   (5,307 )
      

Note E—Income Taxation

The Income tax (charge) benefit comprises:

 

     2003     2002    2001
     $’000     $’000    $’000

Corporate income taxes payable

   (202 )   13    —  
               
   (202 )   13    —  
               

The net deferred tax asset is made up as follows:

 

     2003     2002     2001  
     $’000     $’000     $’000  

Net loss before taxation

   29,664     29,844     28,490  
                  

Deferred tax assets:

      

Tax loss carried forward

   64,269     44,676     28,560  

Other timing assets

   2,985     2,430     909  

Deferred tax liabilities:

      

Accelerated depreciation allowances

   (2,569 )   (2,791 )   (2,067 )

Exchange translation on bond payable

   (4,664 )   (850 )  

Other timing liabilities

   (5,383 )   (3,102 )   (1,654 )
                  

Net deferred tax asset (Before valuation allowance)

   54,638     40,363     25,748  

Valuation allowance

   (54,638 )   (40,363 )   (25,748 )
                  

Net deferred tax asset

   —       —       —    
                  

 

F-118


Table of Contents

SHURGARD SELF STORAGE S.C.A.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

The Group has re-evaluated the appropriateness of its deferred tax assets. Based on the fact that it has not demonstrated a history of taxable income in any jurisdiction since inception, the Group has concluded that it is not appropriate to recognize the potential future benefit of these deferred tax assets until such time as it actually begins to realize them. Consequently, in accordance with SFAS 109, a full valuation allowance is necessary. The facts considered have been present since 2001, and as a result, the Group has determined that a full valuation allowance should have been recorded for net deferred tax assets recognized in prior periods. As a result, the accompanying consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001 have been restated.

A summary of the significant effects of the restatement is as follows:

 

     At December 31, 2002     At December 31, 2001  
     As
previously
reported
$’000
    As
restated
$’000
    As
previously
reported
$’000
    As
restated
$’000
 

Net deferred tax asset

   36,428     —       24,005     —    

Shareholder’s Equity

   48,336     11,908     46,617     22,612  
     2002     2001  
     As
previously
reported
$’000
    As
restated
$’000
    As
previously
reported
$’000
    As
restated
$’000
 

Net loss

   (22,501 )   (29,831 )   (21,292 )   (29,596 )

Net operating losses carried forward at the end of 2003 amounted to $181,085,000 and they may be carried forward indefinitely in all jurisdictions.

In 2002 and 2001, net operating losses carried forward amounted to $125,860,000 and $90,167,000 respectively.

Note F—Other Assets

Other assets are comprised of:

 

     2003    2002    2001
     (in thousands)

Accounts receivable, net of allowances

   8,710    5,187    2,490

Prepayments and deposits

   8,216    10,003    1,810

Value Added Taxes recoverable

   4,776    5,234    6,393

Financing costs, net of amortization

   7,418    7,553    6,327

Software development and other intangibles, net of amortization

   1,472    1,116    953

Other assets

   1,310    1,010    2,086
              
   31,902    30,103    20,059
              

The risk on our accounts receivable is limited due to the nature of the business which is characterized by a large number of customers and low transaction values per customer.

 

F-119


Table of Contents

SHURGARD SELF STORAGE S.C.A.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Note G—Liabilities Under Leases

The Group has a number of operating lease commitments, including ground leases with terms up to 95 years. Under these lease agreements, the Group expensed $2,149,000, $1,416,000 and $1,209,000 in the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The Group also leases five properties in Belgium and the Netherlands under capital leases with purchase options on the Belgian properties exercisable in 2011 and 2022 respectively. The liability under these leases was $11,391,000, $9,469,000 and $7,838,000 at December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 respectively.

The future minimum payments required under these leases are as follows (in thousands):

 

Year

  

Future
payments

Operating
leases

  

Future
payments

Capital
leases

2004

   2,557    879

2005

   1,840    884

2006

   2,109    886

2007

   2,070    889

2008

   2,105    892

Following years

   32,584    32,036

Note H—Bonds payable

In May 2002, the Company entered into a Subscription Agreement with Shurgard under which Shurgard irrevocably agreed to subscribe to registered bonds in the aggregate principal amount of up to $55,000,000 (reduced from $75,000,000 under amendments to the Subscription Agreement dated May and December 2003) to be issued by the Company from time to time in order to meet its development and working capital requirements. These subscription commitments automatically terminate two years following the date of the agreement.

The bonds are unsecured and subordinated to all creditors including other unsecured creditors, although they are senior to all equity distributions or distribution rights of any kind. They bear annual interest at 9.75% with an unused fee of 1% per annum on the undrawn amount. The Company has the option to pay interest in either cash or by the issue of additional bonds that are not taken into account in computing the maximum principal amount of bonds that may be issued as above. As at December 31, 2003, the aggregate face value of bonds issued under the Agreement was $55,274,000, including $6,249,000 in respect of accrued interest. In the year ended December 31, 2002, the Company also paid to Shurgard a commitment fee of 0.5% and a structuring fee of 1.5% of the initial commitment of $50,000,000.

The bonds will be redeemed on December 31, 2004 at 115% of the principal amount of the issued bonds together with accrued interest. The Company has two one year options to extend the redemption date, subject to certain conditions, and may also redeem all or any part of the outstanding bonds at any time. Any bonds so redeemed will be cancelled and may not be re-issued. The Company is accruing the redemption premium payable on the effective interest method assuming the bond will be redeemed on December 31, 2006, taking into account the options to extend the redemption date.

Under the Subscription Agreement, subject to the condition, inter alia, that the Company has already launched an Initial Public Offering on a regulated stock market, Shurgard has undertaken, if so requested, to subscribe to any capital increase in the Company prior to the redemption date to be effected by a contribution in kind of receivables arising from the outstanding bonds held by Shurgard at a price equal to 80% of the trading price of the shares at the time.

 

F-120


Table of Contents

SHURGARD SELF STORAGE S.C.A.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Note I—Line of Credit

This comprises:

 

     Amount of
facility
   Amount drawn   

Interest

rate at
December 31,
2003

 

Bridge credit agreement end 2003

   310,000,000    $ 376,553,000    3.8 %

Bridge credit agreement end 2002

   300,000,000    $ 270,936,000    4.8 %

This facility, which was drawn down on 29 December 2003 in order to refinance the Group’s existing revolving credit agreement, bears interest at a margin over EURIBOR +2%, is secured by mortgages and other charges on substantially all of the storage centers and certain other assets of group companies. It is subject to customary banking covenants and is repayable on December 31, 2004. The Group is examining proposals for longer term financing.

Note J—Derivative instruments and hedging activities

The Group has used interest rate swaps and caps to manage its variable rate debt and forward contracts for the sale of foreign currencies in order to manage its foreign currency investments as described below. These transactions have been accounted for in accordance with SFAS 133 as described in Note B.

Foreign currency risk

In order to minimize the risk of changes in the fair value of assets attributable to fluctuating exchange rates, the Company entered into contracts for the hedging of that proportion of investments made in currencies outside the euro zone and financed by euro denominated debt, through the forward sale of such currencies as at December 31, 2003, the maturity date of the related financing (See note I). Credit risk was minimized through the placing of such contracts only with highly rated banks in major European financial markets. In accordance with SFAS 133, at maturity of the contracts at December 31, 2003, the Company received proceeds of $2,283,000 in respect of the market value of the contracts at that date (2002: liability of $37,000; 2001: liability of $990,000), which was recorded by a credit of $2,327,000 (2002: credit of $1,135,000; 2001: charge of $990,000) to Foreign Currency Translation in OCI.

Interest rate risk

In 2001, the Company entered into an interest rate cap agreement at 6.75% for a notional amount of €64,000,000 ($80,331,000 at December 31, 2003) and an interest rate swap fixing the interest rate at 5.24% for a notional amount of €191,000,000 ($239,739,000 at December 31, 2003), both contracts maturing on December 31, 2003. During 2002, the Company purchased two further interest rate caps at 6.75% for notional amounts of €25,000,000 ($31,379,000 at December 31, 2003) and €20,000,000 ($25,104,000 at December 31, 2003) respectively maturing also on December 31, 2003, for a total cost of €36,000 ($45,000 at December 31, 2003). Although these transactions were designated as cash flow hedges of the interest rate risk attributable to changes in the variable rate interest on the Group’s Line of Credit (Note I), the terms differed from the underlying debt in that, at December 31, 2002, the notional value of the contracts exceeded the amount drawn under the Line of Credit by €41,500,000 ($43,496,000 at December 31, 2002) (2001: €58,000,000; $51,377,000 at December 31, 2001). Accordingly, in the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2002, the Company used the hypothetical derivative method to test hedge effectiveness as well as the amount of ineffectiveness to be recorded in earnings. This method compares changes in the value of a hypothetical “at market” swap for a notional amount

 

F-121


Table of Contents

SHURGARD SELF STORAGE S.C.A.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

matching the hedged debt to changes in value of the actual swap. Amounts are recorded in net interest expense (see below) to the extent changes in value of the actual swap exceed changes in the value of the hypothetically perfect swap.

The Group adopted SFAS 133 on January 1, 2001 and initially recorded a charge of $1,106,000 in respect of a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle relating to the adjustment from its book value of $1,421,000 to market value of $315,000 of the Company’s interest rate cap at that date. As the above contracts matured at December 31, 2003, their fair market value was reduced to $Nil at that date (2002: A liability of $1,524,000; 2001: An asset of $996,000) by a credit to OCI of $2,017,000 (2002: debit of $2,739,000; 2001: credit of $891,000) and a debit to interest expense of $192,000 (2002: credit of $950; 2001: debit of $761,000).

Note K—Subordinated Loan Payable

At December 31, 2002, the Company had drawn €121,763,000, including accrued interest at annual rate of 8.25%, under a €206,000,000 ($258,567,000 at December 31, 2003) Loan Facility Agreement with Recom & Co SNC (Recom), a Belgian holding company with a partnership interest then of 53.83% in the Company. The outstanding loan of €128,766,000 ($142,892,000 at September 8, 2003), including accrued interest, was repaid in full on September 8, 2003 by payment of cash of €6,618,000 ($7,344,000 at September 8, 2003) together with the contribution in kind by Recom of the balance of €122,148,000 ($135,548,000 at 8 September 2003) in consideration for its subscription for shares issued under certain warrants (See Note L).

Note L—Shareholders’ Equity

The registered capital of the Company amounts to €15,695,000 (equivalent to $17,779,000 at historical rates) which is represented by 97,789 Partner Interests, each representing an equal part of the capital. The participants comprise General Partners, who commit themselves with unlimited liability, jointly and severally, to the obligations of the Company and Classes A, B and C Limited Liability Partners, whose liability is limited up to the amount of their contribution, provided that they do not engage in the management of the Company. No Class B or C Partner Interests have yet been issued. The three classes of Partner Interests have in certain circumstances (i) varying preference rights with respect to distributions made by the Company to its partners and (ii) varying rights to give effect to a transfer or sale of their interest.

On October 8, 1999, the Company entered into a Joint Venture Agreement with new partners in order to provide capital to finance the ongoing development of the Group’s business. Under this Agreement, the partners subscribed to additional General Partner Interests in the Company for a total amount of $8,500. In addition to the partner interests representing the registered capital of the Company, the Company also issued to the new partners 178,306 Profit Certificates against a commitment to contribute in cash an amount of €684.13 (equivalent to $859 at December 31, 2003) per certificate. At December 31, 2003 and 2002, the Profit Certificates were fully subscribed, amounting in total to €121,984,000 ($113,665,000 at historical rates). Each Profit Certificate entitles its holder to certain voting rights as set out in the Joint Venture Agreement and otherwise to the same rights and obligations as a limited liability partner interest. Each Profit Certificate may be converted into one Class B limited liability partner interest at any time provided that it has been paid up in accordance with the terms of the Joint Venture Agreement.

The Company also issued free of charge to certain of its partners, a total of 136,111 warrants, each to acquire one Class A limited liability partner interest through a capital increase at a predetermined price. These warrants were exercised on September 8, 2003 for a total consideration of €128,740,000 ($142,863,000 at September 8, 2003) of which €6,592,000 ($7,315,000 at September 8, 2003) was paid in cash and €122,148,000

 

F-122


Table of Contents

SHURGARD SELF STORAGE S.C.A.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

($135,548,000 at September 8, 2003) was settled by way of contribution in kind of the Subordinated Loan Payable (Note K). This contribution in kind has not been recorded in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flow as it represents a non cash transaction.

On February 27, 2001, as part of arrangements for additional financing, the Company and its partners entered into a further agreement under which the partners agreed to subscribe for a further 40,928 New Profit Certificates at €684.13 (equivalent to $859 at December 31, 2003) per New Profit Certificate, amounting in total to €28,000,000 ($35,145,000 at December 31, 2003). Subsequent to December 31, 2002, the partners are only required at the discretion of the Company to pay up the New Profit Certificates in the event the Company defaults (or threatens to default) on the terms of any material indebtedness or in the event of bankruptcy, insolvency or liquidation, irrespective of other conditions. When it is fully paid, each New Profit Certificate may be converted into one Class C limited liability partner interest at any time.

Note M—Compensation and Benefit Plans

On 6 December 2001, the Group adopted the Shurgard Self Storage SCA European Share Plan that provides for the granting of options to eligible employees of Group companies to acquire limited liability Class A Partner Interests in the Company up to a maximum of 7% of the issued ordinary share capital. The options vest after three years. Under the Plan, option holders irrevocably grant to Shurgard a call option with right of first refusal to purchase shares and Shurgard grants option holders a put option to sell to Shurgard any shares acquired under the Plan at a price based upon an independent valuation of the Group. The following table summarizes the number of options issued, none of which are yet exercisable:

 

     Number of
options
    Weighted
average
exercise price
  

$ equivalent
as at

Dec 31,
2003

Granted in 2002

   1,836     950    $ 1,192

Forfeit or refused

   (78 )   950    $ 1,192
                   

Outstanding at December 31, 2002

   1,758     950    $ 1,192

Granted in 2003

   955     1,010    $ 1,268

Forfeit or refused

   (430 )   991    $ 1,244
                   

Outstanding at December 31, 2003

   2,283     967    $ 1,214
                   

 

Exercise price

   Options
outstanding
at December 31,
2003
   Weighted
average
remaining
life

€950

   1,624    1.9 years

€1,010

   659    2.9 years
       
   2,283   
       

In 1999, the Group established a Phantom Share Incentive Plan in which certain employees are eligible to participate. Under this Plan, annual awards are made to eligible employees of rights to receive a compensation benefit calculated according to a predetermined formula based upon the increase in value of the business of the Group between the date of the award and the date of exercise of the rights. Under the terms of the Plan, rights generally vest on the third anniversary of the date of grant only if the employee has remained with the Group and may only be exercised thereafter either (i) on the date of an initial public offering, (ii) if any participant ceases to be an employee or (iii) otherwise on December 31, 2005. In the year ended December 31, 2003, payments of

 

F-123


Table of Contents

SHURGARD SELF STORAGE S.C.A.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

$27,000 were made under the Plan. A provision was recorded for the estimated cost of the benefit payable under the Plan for awards granted prior to the balance sheet date based upon the estimated increase in value of the business up to that date, calculated according to the predetermined formula, on the assumption that all awards that have not otherwise lapsed will vest in due course. This provision amounted to $768,000 and $419,000 as at December 31, 2003 and 2002 respectively.

Certain group companies make defined contributions to pension plans according to local employment law and practice. The cost of contributions to such plans, which is expensed as incurred, was $750,000, $450,000 and $335,000 in the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 respectively.

Note N—Commitments and Contingent liabilities

There are no material contingencies or litigation known to the Group. Commitments are disclosed in Notes C and G.

Note O—Segment Reporting

The Group has adopted two reportable segments: “Same” and “New” Stores. The definition of Same Stores includes existing stores acquired prior to January 1st of the previous year as well as developed properties that have been operating for a full two years as of January 1st of the current year. All other facilities are defined as New Stores.

The performance of properties is evaluated based upon Net Operating Income (NOI), which is defined as rental revenue less direct operating expenses and real estate taxes. These segments allow management to focus separately on increasing NOI from existing properties and renting up new facilities. The accounting policies applicable to segments are as described in Note B above. There are no inter-segment sales and transfers. Depreciation and amortization, other operating expenses and net interest expense are not allocated to segments.

The following table illustrates the results for these segments for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 using the Same Store and New Store data for the 47 stores meeting the above criteria as at December 31, 2003.

 

     Same Stores     New Stores     TOTAL  
     (in thousands)  

Year ended December 31, 2003

      

Rental revenue

   42,930     24,388     67,318  

Direct store operating expenses(1)

   (15,747 )   (17,563 )   (33,310 )
                  

NOI

   27,183     6,825     34,008  
                  

Total land, buildings & equipment

   216,745     318,374     535,119  
                  

Year ended December 31, 2002

      

Rental revenue

   34,372     9,140     43,512  

Direct store operating expenses(1)

   (12,525 )   (9,730 )   (22,255 )
                  

NOI

   21,847     (590 )   21,257  
                  

Total land, buildings & equipment

   192,179     168,363     360,542  
                  

 

F-124


Table of Contents

SHURGARD SELF STORAGE S.C.A.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

The following table illustrates the results for these segments for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 using the Same Store and New Store data for the 28 stores meeting the above criteria as at December 31, 2002.

 

     Same Stores     New Stores     TOTAL  
     (in thousands)  

Year ended December 31, 2002

      

Rental revenue

   23,153     20,359     43,512  

Direct store operating expenses(1)

   (7,734 )   (14,521 )   (22,255 )
                  

NOI

   15,419     5,838     21,257  
                  

Total land, buildings & equipment

   105,161     255,381     360,542  
                  

Year ended December 31, 2001

      

Rental revenue

   17,849     8,677     26,526  
                  

Direct store operating expenses(1)

   (7,012 )   (8,466 )   (15,478 )
                  

NOI

   10,837     211     11,048  
                  

Total land, buildings & equipment

   92,957     130,503     223,460  
                  

(1) Including real estate taxes and leasehold expense

The following table reconciles the reported segments’ revenue to consolidated total revenue for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001:

 

     2003    2002    2001
     (in thousands)

Total segment revenue

   67,318    43,512    26,526

Other income

   11,376      
              

Total revenue

   78,694    43,512    26,526
              

Of the total segment revenue, $10,829,000 (2002: $8,550,000) was attributed to Belgium and $56,489,000 (2002: $34,962,000) to other European markets.

The following table reconciles the reported segments’ NOI to consolidated net loss for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001:

 

     2003     2002     2001  
     (in thousands)  

Total segment NOI

   34,008     21,251     11,048  

Other income

   11,376      

Depreciation and amortization

   (19,433 )   (12,959 )   (9,044 )

Other operating expenses

   (30,794 )   (16,966 )   (14,020 )

Effect of change in accounting principle

   —       —       (1,106 )

Net financial expense

   (34,651 )   (23,527 )   (16,474 )

Exch. transl. gain on bonds payable

   9,830     2,357    

Provision for taxes

   (202 )   13    
                  

Net loss

   (29,866 )   (29,831 )   (29,596 )
                  

 

F-125


Table of Contents

SHURGARD SELF STORAGE S.C.A.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

The following table reconciles the reported segments’ assets to consolidated assets as at December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001:

 

     2003    2002    2001
     (in thousands)

Total segment assets

   535,119    360,542    223,460

Construction in progress

   12,766    87,225    68,839

Other fixed assets

   2,893    2,325    1,485

Other assets

   73,691    91,509    59,387
              

Consolidated total assets

   624,469    541,601    353,171
              

Of the total segment assets, $68,409,000 (2002: $55,822,000) was attributed to Belgium and $466,710,000 (2002: $304,720,000) to other European markets.

Note P—Related Party Transactions

Related Party Transactions are disclosed in Notes D, H and K. Additionally (i) on October 8, 1999, the Company entered into a license agreement with Shurgard whereby the Company was granted an exclusive license for the use of proprietary marks and know-how for establishing, owning and operating self-storage facilities in countries within Western Europe. As from October 8, 1999, the Company pays the costs in connection with registering proprietary marks within its territory, and (ii) the Group also reimburses Shurgard and two partners for the services of certain key executives. These charges amounted to $838,000, $1,293,000 and $1,064,000 in the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 respectively. Finally, (iii), in Other Revenue, the amount of $11.4 million in 2003 is comprised of development fees, management fees and other initial financing fees invoiced to First Shurgard less our share of losses in the joint venture of $1.1 million.

 

F-126


Table of Contents

PART II

INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS

 

Item 14. Other Expenses of Issuance and Distribution.

The estimated expenses, other than underwriting discounts and commissions, in connection with the offerings of the Securities, are as follows:

 

Registration Fee—Securities and Exchange Commission

   $ 15,350 (1)

Transfer Agent, Depositary and Trustee Fees

     200,000  

Rating Agency Fees

     400,000  

Printing and Engraving Expenses

     300,000  

Legal Fees and Expenses

     200,000  

Accounting Fees and Expenses

     200,000  

Miscellaneous

     31,600  
        

Total

   $ 1,346,950  
        

(1) Includes $1,070 previously paid in connection with registration statement no. 333-136139. Additional fees will be paid subsequently in advance of a particular offering.

 

Item 15. Indemnification of Directors and Officers.

The Maryland REIT Law permits a Maryland real estate investment trust to include in its declaration of trust a provision limiting the liability of its trustees and officers to the trust and its shareholders for money damages except for liability resulting from (a) actual receipt of an improper benefit or profit in money, property or services or (b) active or deliberate dishonesty established in a judgment or other final adjudication to be material to the cause of action. Our declaration of trust contains a provision that limits the liability of our trustees and officers to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law.

The Maryland REIT Law permits a Maryland real estate investment trust to indemnify and advance expenses to its trustees, officers, employees and agents to the same extent as permitted by the Maryland General Corporation Law (the “MGCL”) for directors and officers of Maryland corporations. The MGCL permits a corporation to indemnify its present and former directors and officers, among others, against judgments, penalties, fines, settlements and reasonable expenses actually incurred by them in connection with any proceeding to which they may be a party by reason of their service in those or other capacities unless it is established that (a) the act or omission if the director or officer was material to the matter giving rise to the proceeding and (i) was committed in bad faith or (ii) was a result of active and deliberate dishonesty, (b) the director or officer actually received an improper personal benefit in money, property or services or (c) in the case of any criminal proceeding, the director or officer had reasonable cause to believe that the act or omission was unlawful. However, a Maryland corporation may not indemnify for an adverse judgment in a suit by or in the right if the corporation or if the director or officer was adjudged to be liable to the corporation nor may a director be indemnified in circumstances in which the director is found liable for an improper personal benefit. In accordance with the MGCL and our bylaws, our bylaws require us, as a condition to advancement of expenses, to obtain (a) a written affirmation by the trustee or officer of his good faith belief that he has met the standard of conduct necessary for indemnification and (b) a written statement by or on his behalf to repay the amount paid or reimbursed by us if it shall ultimately be determined that the standard of conduct was not met.

Our declaration of trust provides that we shall indemnify, to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law in effect from time to time, any individual who is a present or former trustee or officer (including any individual who, at our request, serves or has served as an, officer, partner, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan or any other enterprise) from and against any claim or liability to which such person may become subject by reason of service in such capacity. We have the

 

II-1


Table of Contents

power, with the approval of our board of trustees, to provide indemnification and advancement of expenses to a present or former trustee or officer who served a predecessor of our company in any of the capacities described above and to any employee or agent of our company or a predecessor of our company. Maryland law requires us to indemnify a trustee or officer who has been successful, on the merits or otherwise, in the defense of any proceeding to which he is made a party by reason of his service in that capacity.

We have also entered into indemnity agreements with our management and non-management trustees and executive officers. We believe the indemnification agreements will assist us in attracting and retaining qualified individuals to serve as our trustees and executive officers.

 

Item 16. Exhibits

The Exhibit Index filed herewith is incorporated herein by reference.

 

Item 17. Undertakings.

The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes:

 

  (1) To file, during any period in which offers or sales are being made, a post-effective amendment to this registration statement:

 

  (i) To include any prospectus required by Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933;

 

  (ii) To reflect in the prospectus any facts or events arising after the effective date of the registration statement (or the most recent post-effective amendment thereof) which, individually or in the aggregate, represent a fundamental change in the information set forth in this registration statement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any increase or decrease in volume of securities offered (if the total dollar value of securities offered would not exceed that which was registered) and any deviation from the low or high end of the estimated maximum offering range may be reflected in the form of prospectus filed with the Commission pursuant to Rule 424(b) if, in the aggregate, the changes in volume and price represent no more than 20 percent change in the maximum aggregate offering price set forth in the “Calculation of Registration Fee” table in the effective registration statement;

 

  (iii) To include any material information with respect to the plan of distribution not previously disclosed in this registration statement or any material change to such information in this registration statement;

Provided, however, that subparagraphs (i), (ii) and (iii) of this section do not apply if the information required to be included in a post-effective amendment by those paragraphs is contained in reports filed with or furnished to the Commission by the registrant pursuant to section 13 or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 that are incorporated by reference in the registration statement, or is contained in a form of prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b) that is part of the registration statement.

 

  (2) That, for the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act, each such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.

 

  (3) To remove from registration by means of a post-effective amendment any of the Securities being registered which remains unsold at the termination of the offering.

 

  (4) That, for the purpose of determining liability under the Securities Act of 1933 to any purchaser:

(A) Each prospectus filed by the registrant pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3) shall be deemed to be part of the registration statement as of the date the filed prospectus was deemed part of and included in the registration statement; and

 

II-2


Table of Contents

(B) Each prospectus required to be filed pursuant to Rule 424(b)(2), (b)(5), or (b)(7) as part of a registration statement in reliance on Rule 430B relating to an offering made pursuant to Rule 415(a)(1)(i), (vii), or (x) for the purpose of providing the information required by section 10(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 shall be deemed to be part of and included in the registration statement as of the earlier of the date such form of prospectus is first used after effectiveness or the date of the first contract of sale of securities in the offering described in the prospectus. As provided in Rule 430B, for liability purposes of the issuer and any person that is at that date an underwriter, such date shall be deemed to be a new effective date of the registration statement relating to the securities in the registration statement to which that prospectus relates, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof. Provided, however, that no statement made in a registration statement or prospectus that is part of the registration statement or made in a document incorporated or deemed incorporated by reference into the registration statement or prospectus that is part of the registration statement will, as to a purchaser with a time of contract of sale prior to such effective date, supersede or modify any statement that was made in the registration statement or prospectus that was part of the registration statement or made in any such document immediately prior to such effective date.

 

  (5) That, for the purpose of determining liability of the registrant under the Securities Act of 1933 to any purchaser in the initial distribution of the securities:

The undersigned registrant undertakes that in a primary offering of securities of the undersigned registrant pursuant to this registration statement, regardless of the underwriting method used to sell the securities to the purchaser, if the securities are offered or sold to such purchaser by means of any of the following communications, the undersigned registrant will be a seller to the purchaser and will be considered to offer or sell such securities to such purchaser:

 

  (i) Any preliminary prospectus or prospectus of the undersigned registrant relating to the offering required to be filed pursuant to Rule 424;

 

  (ii) Any free writing prospectus relating to the offering prepared by or on behalf of the undersigned registrant or used or referred to by the undersigned registrant;

 

  (iii) The portion of any other free writing prospectus relating to the offering containing material information about the undersigned registrant or its securities provided by or on behalf of the undersigned registrant; and

 

  (iv) Any other communication that is an offer in the offering made by the undersigned registrant to the purchaser.

The undersigned registrant hereby further undertakes:

 

  (1) That for purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act, each filing of the registrant’s annual report pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act (and, where applicable, each filing of an employee benefit plan’s annual report pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act) that is incorporated by reference in the Registration Statement shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof,

 

  (2)

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the registrant will,

 

II-3


Table of Contents
 

unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue. the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.

 

  (3) To file an application for the purpose of determining the eligibility of the trustee to act under subsection (a) of Section 310 of the Trust Indenture Act in accordance with the rules and regulations prescribed by the Commission under Section 305(b)(2) of the Act.

 

II-4


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the Registrant certifies that it has reasonable grounds to believe that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form S-3 and has duly caused this Registration Statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Glendale, State of California, on June 25, 2007.

 

PUBLIC STORAGE
By:   /s/    RONALD L. HAVNER, JR.        
  Ronald L. Havner, Jr.
  President & Chief Executive Officer

Each person whose signature appears below hereby authorizes John S. Baumann and Stephanie Heim, and each of them, as attorney-in-fact, to sign on his behalf, individually and in each capacity stated below, any amendment, including post-effective amendments to this Registration Statement, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and all documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this Registration Statement has been signed by the following persons in the capacities indicated on June 25, 2007.

 

Name

  

Title

/s/    RONALD L. HAVNER, JR.        

Ronald L. Havner, Jr.

  

Vice Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, President and Trustee (principal executive officer)

/s/    B. WAYNE HUGHES        

B. Wayne Hughes

  

Chairman of the Board and Trustee

/s/    JOHN REYES        

John Reyes

  

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer and principal accounting officer)

/s/    DANN V. ANGELOFF        

Dann V. Angeloff

  

Trustee

/s/    WILLIAM C. BAKER        

William C. Baker

  

Trustee

/s/    JOHN T. EVANS        

John T. Evans

  

Trustee

/s/    URI P. HARKHAM        

Uri P. Harkham

  

Trustee

/s/    B. WAYNE HUGHES, JR.        

B. Wayne Hughes, Jr.

  

Trustee

/s/    GARY E. PRUITT        

Gary E. Pruitt

  

Trustee

/s/    DANIEL C. STATON        

Daniel C. Staton

  

Trustee


Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX

 

Exhibit No.

  

Description

    1.1

   Form of Underwriting Agreement. (1)

    3.1

   Articles of Amendment and Restatement of Declaration of Trust of Public Storage, a Maryland real estate investment trust. Filed with the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 6, 2007 and incorporated by reference herein.

    3.2

   Bylaws of Public Storage, a Maryland real estate investment trust. Filed with the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 6, 2007 and incorporated by reference herein.

    3.3

   Articles Supplementary for Public Storage Equity Shares, Series A. Filed with the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 6, 2007 and incorporated by reference herein.

    3.4

   Articles Supplementary for Public Storage Equity Shares, Series AAA. Filed with the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 6, 2007 and incorporated by reference herein.

    3.5

   Articles Supplementary for Public Storage 7.500% Cumulative Preferred Shares, Series V. Filed with the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 6, 2007 and incorporated by reference herein.

    3.6

   Articles Supplementary for Public Storage 6.500% Cumulative Preferred Shares, Series W. Filed with the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 6, 2007 and incorporated by reference herein.

    3.7

   Articles Supplementary for Public Storage 6.450% Cumulative Preferred Shares , Series X. Filed with the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 6, 2007 and incorporated by reference herein.

    3.8

   Articles Supplementary for Public Storage 6.850% Cumulative Preferred Shares, Series Y. Filed with the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 6, 2007 and incorporated by reference herein.

    3.9

   Articles Supplementary for Public Storage 6.250% Cumulative Preferred Shares, Series Z. Filed with the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 6, 2007 and incorporated by reference herein.

    3.10

   Articles Supplementary for Public Storage 6.125% Cumulative Preferred Shares, Series A. Filed with the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 6, 2007 and incorporated by reference herein.

    3.11

   Articles Supplementary for Public Storage 7.125% Cumulative Preferred Shares, Series B. Filed with the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 6, 2007 and incorporated by reference herein.

    3.12

   Articles Supplementary for Public Storage 6.600% Cumulative Preferred Shares, Series C. Filed with the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 6, 2007 and incorporated by reference herein.

    3.13

   Articles Supplementary for Public Storage 6.180% Cumulative Preferred Shares, Series D. Filed with the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 6, 2007 and incorporated by reference herein.

    3.14

   Articles Supplementary for Public Storage 6.750% Cumulative Preferred Shares, Series E. Filed with the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 6, 2007 and incorporated by reference herein.

    3.15

   Articles Supplementary for Public Storage 6.450% Cumulative Preferred Shares, Series F. Filed with the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 6, 2007 and incorporated by reference herein.


Table of Contents

Exhibit No.

  

Description

    3.16

   Articles Supplementary for Public Storage 7.000% Cumulative Preferred Shares, Series G. Filed with the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 6, 2007 and incorporated by reference herein.

    3.17

   Articles Supplementary for Public Storage 6.950% Cumulative Preferred Shares, Series H. Filed with the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 6, 2007 and incorporated by reference herein.

    3.18

   Articles Supplementary for Public Storage 7.250% Cumulative Preferred Shares, Series I. Filed with the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 6, 2007 and incorporated by reference herein.

    3.19

   Articles Supplementary for Public Storage 7.250% Cumulative Preferred Shares, Series K. Filed with the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 6, 2007 and incorporated by reference herein.

    3.20

   Articles Supplementary for Public Storage 6.750% Cumulative Preferred Shares, Series L. Filed with the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 6, 2007 and incorporated by reference herein.

    3.21

   Articles Supplementary for Public Storage 6.625% Cumulative Preferred Shares, Series M. Filed with the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 6, 2007 and incorporated by reference herein.

    4

   Form of Articles Supplementary for additional series of Preferred Shares. (1)

    4.2

   Master Deposit Agreement, dated as of May 31, 2007. Filed with the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 6, 2007 and incorporated by reference herein.

    4.3

   Form of Articles Supplementary for additional series of Equity Shares. (1)

    4.4

   Form of Warrant Agreement. (1)

    4.5

   Form of Indenture for Debt Securities. (1)

    5.1

   Opinion of Hogan & Hartson L.L.P. as to the legality of the shares being registered. Filed herewith.

    8.1

   Opinion of Hogan & Hartson L.L.P. as to certain U.S. federal income tax matters. Filed herewith.

  12.1

   Statement on computation of ratio of earnings to fixed charges. Filed as Exhibit 12 with Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference.

  23.1

   Consent of Ernst & Young LLP. Filed herewith.

  23.2

   Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. Filed herewith.

  23.3

   Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP. Filed herewith.

  23.4

   Consent of Hogan & Hartson L.L.P. (included in Exhibit 5.1).

  23.5

   Consent of Hogan & Hartson L.L.P. (included in exhibit 8.1).

  25.1

   Statement of Eligibility of Trustee.(1)

(1) To be filed by amendment or incorporated by reference in connection with the offering of securities.