Edgar Filing: Resolute Energy Corp

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Form 10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D. C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File No. 001-34464

RESOLUTE ENERGY CORPORATION

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)


Delaware		27-0659371
(State or other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

1675 Broadway, Suite 1950 Denver, CO		80202
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)		(Zip Code)

(303) 534-4600

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

As of July 31, 2012, 61,891,096 shares of the Registrant’s $0.0001 par value Common Stock were outstanding.

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains “forward-looking statements” as that term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The use of any statements containing the words “anticipate,” “intend,” “believe,” “estimate,” “project,” “expect,” “plan,” “should” or similar expressions are intended to identify such statements. Forward-looking statements included in this report relate to, among other things, expected future production, expenses and cash flows in 2012 and beyond, the nature, timing and results of capital expenditure projects, amounts of future capital expenditures, the results of exploration and development activities, our plans with respect to future acquisitions, our future debt levels and liquidity and future derivative activities. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, those expectations may prove to be incorrect. Disclosure of important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations, or cautionary statements, are included under the heading “Risk Factors.” All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date made. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us, or persons acting on our behalf, are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations include, among others, those factors referenced in the “Risk Factors” section of this report, in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, and such things as:

•

volatility of oil and gas prices, including reductions in prices that would adversely affect our revenue, income, cash flow from operations, liquidity and reserves, discovery, estimation and development of, and our ability to replace oil and gas reserves;

•

our future cash flow, liquidity and financial position;

•

the success of our business and financial strategy, derivative strategies and plans;

•

the amount, nature and timing of our capital expenditures, including future development costs;

•

our relationship with the Navajo Nation, the local community in the area where we operate, and Navajo Nation Oil and Gas Company, as well as the timing of when certain purchase rights held by Navajo Nation Oil and Gas Company become exercisable;

•

the effectiveness and results of our CO₂ flood program;

•

the impact of U.S. and global economic recession;

•

anticipated CO₂supply, which is currently sourced exclusively from Kinder Morgan CO₂ Company, L.P.;

•

the success of the development plan and production from our oil and gas properties, particularly our Aneth Field Properties;

•

the timing and amount of future production of oil and gas;

•

the completion, timing and success of exploratory drilling;

•

availability of, or delays related to, drilling, completion and production, personnel, supplies and equipment;

•

the effect of third party activities on our oil and gas operations, including our dependence on gas gathering and processing systems;

•

inaccuracy in reserve estimates and expected production rates;

•

our operating costs and other expenses;

•

our success in marketing oil and gas;

•

competition in the oil and gas industry;

•

the concentration of our producing properties in a limited number of geographic areas;

•

operational problems, or uninsured or underinsured losses affecting our operations or financial results;

•

the impact and costs related to compliance with, or changes in, laws or regulations governing our oil and gas operations, including the potential for increased regulation of underground injection operations;

•

the availability of water and our ability to adequately treat and dispose of water after drilling and completing wells;

•

potential changes to regulations affecting derivatives instruments;

•

the success of our hedging program;

•

the impact of weather and the occurrence of disasters, such as fires, explosions, floods and other events and natural disasters;

•

environmental liabilities under existing or future laws and regulations;

•

developments in oil and gas producing countries;

•

loss of senior management or key technical personnel;

•

timing of issuance of permits and rights of way;

•

timing of installation of gathering infrastructure in areas of new exploration and development;

•

potential breakdown of equipment and machinery relating to the Aneth compression facility;

•

acquisitions and other business opportunities (or the lack thereof) that may be presented to and pursued by us;

•

risks related to our level of indebtedness;

•

a lack of available capital and financing on acceptable terms, including as a result of a reduction in the borrowing base under our credit facility;

•

constraints imposed on our business and operations by our credit agreement and our 8.50% senior notes due 2020 and our ability to generate sufficient cash flow to repay our debt obligations;

•

risk factors discussed or referenced in this report; and

•

other factors, many of which are beyond our control.

TABLE OF CONTENTS


PART I -	FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Financial Statements	1

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	14

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	20

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	22

PART II -	OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	23

Item 1 A.	Risk Factors	23

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	23

Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	23

Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	23

Item 5.	Other Information	23

Item 6.	Exhibits	24

Signatures		25

PART I -

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

RESOLUTE ENERGY CORPORATION

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (UNAUDITED)

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)


	June 30, 2012			December 31, 2011
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	2,852		$	1,135
Accounts receivable		73,532			61,930
Deferred income taxes		7,173			13,694
Derivative instruments		4,015			3,170
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		1,840			1,829

Total current assets		89,412			81,758

Property and equipment, at cost:
Oil and gas properties, full cost method of accounting
Unproved		85,646			64,357
Proved		1,002,973			885,503
Other property and equipment		5,170			4,070
Accumulated depletion, depreciation and amortization		(149,742	)		(114,214	)

Net property and equipment		944,047			839,716

Other assets:
Restricted cash		18,421			16,601
Derivative instruments		2,064			2,291
Deferred financing costs		10,465			2,433
Other assets		8,273			4,761

Total assets	$	1,072,682		$	947,560


Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	105,859		$	87,585
Asset retirement obligations		2,978			3,953
Derivative instruments		16,576			33,910

Total current liabilities		125,413			125,448

Long term liabilities:
Credit facility		27,000			170,000
Senior notes		250,000			—
Asset retirement obligations		13,178			12,600
Derivative instruments		15,229			30,701
Deferred income taxes		99,658			92,986
Other long term liabilities		10,000			—

Total liabilities		540,478			431,735


Commitments and contingencies

Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value; 1,000,000 shares authorized; none issued or outstanding		—			—
Common stock, $0.0001 par value; 225,000,000 shares authorized; issued and outstanding 61,893,009 and 60,947,329 shares at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively		6			6
Additional paid-in capital		512,566			518,267
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)		19,632			(2,448	)

Total stockholders’ equity		532,204			515,825

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	1,072,682		$	947,560

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

- 1 -

RESOLUTE ENERGY CORPORATION

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (UNAUDITED)

(in thousands, except per share data)


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
Revenue:
Oil	$	59,778		$	53,892		$	119,456		$	102,438
Gas		4,410			5,238			8,272			10,043
Other		291			778			291			1,483

Total revenue		64,479			59,908			128,019			113,964

Operating expenses:
Lease operating		19,564			13,526			36,748			27,912
Production and ad valorem taxes		9,642			8,233			19,868			16,025
Depletion, depreciation, amortization, and asset retirement obligation accretion		18,958			13,692			36,016			26,660
General and administrative		5,692			4,753			10,908			9,106

Total operating expenses		53,856			40,204			103,540			79,703

Income from operations		10,623			19,704			24,479			34,261

Other income (expense):
Interest expense, net		(3,696	)		(772	)		(4,910	)		(1,887	)
Realized and unrealized gains (losses) on derivative instruments		29,546			21,644			15,717			(18,331	)
Other income (expense)		(17	)		18			(14	)		52

Total other income (expense)		25,833			20,890			10,793			(20,166	)

Income before income taxes		36,456			40,594			35,272			14,095
Income tax expense		(13,634	)		(14,926	)		(13,192	)		(5,201	)

Net income	$	22,822		$	25,668		$	22,080		$	8,894


Net income per common share:
Basic	$	0.38		$	0.44		$	0.37		$	0.16
Diluted	$	0.37		$	0.37		$	0.36		$	0.13
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
Basic		59,405			58,883			59,401			56,059
Diluted		60,865			70,154			60,664			67,713

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

- 2 -

RESOLUTE ENERGY CORPORATION

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity (UNAUDITED)

(in thousands)


						Additional Paid-in			Accumulated
	Common Stock					Additional Paid-in			(Deficit)/Retained			Stockholders’
	Shares			Amount		Capital			Earnings			Equity

Balance as of January 1, 2012		60,947		$	6	$	518,267		$	(2,448	)	$	515,825
Issuance of stock, restricted stock and equity-based compensation		965			—		4,312			—			4,312
Redemption of restricted stock for employee income tax and restricted stock forfeitures		(19	)		—		(14	)		—			(14	)
Retirement of public warrants		—			—		(9,999	)		—			(9,999	)
Net income		—			—		—			22,080			22,080

Balance as of June 30, 2012		61,893		$	6	$	512,566		$	19,632		$	532,204

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

- 3 -

RESOLUTE ENERGY CORPORATION

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (UNAUDITED)

(in thousands)


	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012			2011
Operating activities:
Net income	$	22,080		$	8,894
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depletion, depreciation, amortization and asset retirement obligation accretion		36,016			26,660
Amortization of deferred financing costs		704			512
Equity-based compensation, net		4,145			3,532
Unrealized (gain) loss on derivative instruments		(33,423	)		7,615
Deferred income taxes		13,192			5,201
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		(11,433	)		(5,715	)
Other current assets		(11	)		59
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		9,300			3,326

Net cash provided by operating activities		40,570			50,084

Investing activities:
Oil and gas exploration and development expenditures		(98,440	)		(66,841	)
Purchase of proved oil and gas properties		(35,807	)		—
Proceeds from sale of oil and gas properties and other `		19			4,505
Purchase of other property and equipment		(1,100	)		(315	)
Increase in restricted cash		(1,820	)		(1,820	)
Other		10,044			45

Net cash used in investing activities		(127,104	)		(64,426	)

Financing activities:
Proceeds from bank borrowings		279,200			138,100
Repayments of bank borrowings		(422,200	)		(199,500	)
Proceeds from issuance of Senior notes		250,000			—
Payment of financing costs		(8,736	)		(130	)
Redemption of restricted stock for employee income taxes and restricted stock forfeitures		(14	)		(15	)
Retirement of public warrants		(9,999	)		—
Proceeds from exercise of warrants		—			74,417

Net cash provided by financing activities		88,251			12,872

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		1,717			(1,470	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		1,135			1,844

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	2,852		$	374


Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest, net of amounts capitalized	$	1,231		$	1,726


Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing and financing activities:
Asset retirement obligations sold	$	—		$	1,307

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

- 4 -

RESOLUTE ENERGY CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1 — Organization and Nature of Business

Resolute Energy Corporation (“Resolute” or the “Company”), a Delaware corporation incorporated on July 28, 2009, is an independent oil and gas company engaged in the acquisition, exploration, development and production of oil, gas and natural gas liquids. The Company conducts all of its activities in the United States of America.

Note 2 — Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and Regulation S-X for interim financial reporting. Except as disclosed herein, there has been no material change in our basis of presentation from the information disclosed in the notes to Resolute’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2011. In the opinion of management, all adjustments consisting of normal recurring accruals considered necessary for a fair presentation of the interim financial information have been included. Operating results for the periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year. All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

In connection with the preparation of the condensed consolidated financial statements, Resolute evaluated events that occurred subsequent to the balance sheet date, through the date of filing.

Significant Accounting Policies

The significant accounting policies followed by Resolute are set forth in Resolute’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2011. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements are to be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements appearing in Resolute’s Annual Report on Form 10-K and related notes for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Assumptions, Judgments and Estimates

The preparation of the condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make various assumptions, judgments and estimates to determine the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and in the disclosures of commitments and contingencies. Changes in these assumptions, judgments and estimates will occur as a result of the passage of time and the occurrence of future events. Accordingly, actual results could differ from amounts previously established.

Significant estimates with regard to the condensed consolidated financial statements include the estimate of proved oil and gas reserve volumes and the related present value of estimated future net cash flows and the ceiling test applied to capitalized oil and gas properties, the estimated cost and timing related to asset retirement obligations, the estimated fair value of derivative assets and liabilities, accrued liabilities, income taxes, the estimated expense for share-based compensation and depletion, depreciation, and amortization.

Note 3 — Asset Retirement Obligation

Asset retirement obligations relate to future costs associated with the plugging and abandonment of oil and gas wells, removal of equipment and facilities from leased acreage and returning such land to its original condition. The fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation is recorded in the period in which it is incurred and the cost of such liability is recorded as an increase in the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset by the same amount. The liability is accreted each period and the capitalized cost is depleted on a units-of-production basis as part of the full cost pool. Revisions to estimated retirement obligations result in adjustments to the related capitalized asset and corresponding liability.

Restricted cash of $18.4 million is contractually restricted for the purpose of settling certain asset retirement obligations of Resolute Aneth, LLC (“Aneth”), which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.

Resolute’s estimated asset retirement obligation liability is based on estimated economic lives, estimates as to the cost to abandon the wells in the future, and federal and state regulatory requirements. The liability is discounted using a credit-adjusted risk-free rate estimated at the time the liability is incurred or revised. Revisions to the liability could occur due to changes in estimated abandonment costs or well economic lives, or if federal or state regulators enact new requirements regarding the abandonment of wells. Asset retirement obligations are valued utilizing Level 3 fair value measurement inputs.

- 5 -

The following table provides a reconciliation of Resolute’s asset retirement obligations for the six months ended June 30, (in thousands):


	2012			2011

Asset retirement obligations at beginning of period	$	16,553		$	14,765
Additional liability incurred		102			72
Accretion expense		488			518
Liabilities settled		(987	)		(1,433	)
Revisions to previous estimates		—			—

Asset retirement obligations at end of period		16,156			13,922
Less: current asset retirement obligations		(2,978	)		(2,843	)

Long-term asset retirement obligations	$	13,178		$	11,079

Note 4 — Earnings per Share

The Company computes basic net income (loss) per share using the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted net income (loss) per share is computed using the weighted average number of shares of common stock and, if dilutive, potential shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Potential dilutive shares consist of the incremental shares issuable under the outstanding warrants, which entitle the holder to purchase one share of Company common stock at a price of $13.00 per share and expire on September 25, 2014, and incremental shares issuable under the Company’s 2009 Performance Incentive Plan (the “Incentive Plan”). The treasury stock method is used to measure the dilutive impact of potentially dilutive shares.

The following table details the potential weighted average dilutive and anti-dilutive securities for the periods presented (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months End June 30,
	2012		2011		2012		2011

Potential dilutive warrants		—		9,847		—		10,413
Potential dilutive restricted stock		1,566		1,424		1,346		1,241
Anti-dilutive securities		42,464		—		42,570		—

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income per share of common stock (in thousands, except per share amounts):


	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012		2011		2012		2011

Net income	$	22,822	$	25,668	$	22,080	$	8,894


Basic weighted average common shares outstanding		59,406		58,883		59,401		56,059
Add: dilutive effect of non-vested restricted stock		1,459		1,424		1,263		1,241
Add: dilutive effect of outstanding warrants		—		9,847		—		10,413

Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding		60,865		70,154		60,664		67,713


Basic earnings per common share	$	0.38	$	0.44	$	0.37	$	0.16
Diluted earnings per common share	$	0.37	$	0.37	$	0.36	$	0.13

- 6 -

Note 5 — Long Term Debt

Credit Facility

Resolute’s credit facility is with a syndicate of banks led by Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the “Credit Facility”) with Resolute as the borrower. The Credit Facility specifies a maximum borrowing base as determined by the lenders. The determination of the borrowing base takes into consideration the estimated value of Resolute’s oil and gas properties in accordance with the lenders’ customary practices for oil and gas loans. The borrowing base is redetermined semi-annually, and the amount available for borrowing could be increased or decreased as a result of such redeterminations. Under certain circumstances, either Resolute or the lenders may request an interim redetermination.

At Resolute’s option, prior to April 2012, the outstanding balance under the Credit Facility accrued interest at either (a) the London Interbank Offered Rate, plus a margin which varied from 1.75% to 2.75% or (b) the Alternative Base Rate defined as the greater of (i) the Administrative Agent’s Prime Rate, (ii) the Federal Funds Effective Rate plus 0.5%, or (iii) an adjusted London Interbank Offered Rate plus 1%, plus a margin which ranged from 0.75% to 1.75%. Each such margin is based on the level of utilization under the borrowing base. During November 2011, the borrowing base was increased to $330.0 million.

In April 2012, the Company entered into the Third Amendment to the amended and restated Credit Facility agreement which increased the size of the revolving Credit Facility from $500 million to $1 billion. In addition, under the terms of the amendment, at Resolute’s option, the Credit Facility accrues interest at either (a) the London Interbank Offered Rate, plus a margin which varies from 1.50% to 2.50% or (b) the alternative Base Rate defined as the greater of (i) the Administrative Agent’s Prime Rate (ii) the Federal Funds effective Rate plus 0.5% or (iii) an adjusted London Interbank Rate plus a margin which ranges from 0.50% to 1.50%. Each such margin is based on the level of utilization under the borrowing base. The Third Amendment also extended the maturity date of the revolving Credit Facility to April 2017. In connection with the Third Amendment, the semi-annual redetermination of the borrowing base was completed, confirming the borrowing base at $330 million.

As of June 30, 2012, outstanding borrowings were $27.0 million under the borrowing base of $330 million. The borrowing base availability had been reduced by $3.1 million in conjunction with letters of credit issued to vendors at June 30, 2012 and $164.5 million associated with limitations based upon a multiple of trailing earnings as defined in Credit Facility. To the extent that the borrowing base, as adjusted from time to time, exceeds the outstanding balance, no repayments of principal are required prior to maturity. The Credit Facility is guaranteed by all of Resolute’s subsidiaries and is collateralized by substantially all of the proved oil and gas assets of Aneth and Resolute Wyoming, Inc., which are wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company.

As of June 30, 2012, the weighted average interest rate on the outstanding balance under the Credit Facility was 3.75%. The recorded value of the Credit Facility approximates its fair market value because the interest rate of the Credit Facility is variable over the term of the loan (Level 2 fair value measurement).

The Credit Facility includes terms and covenants that place limitations on certain types of activities, the payment of dividends, and require satisfaction of certain financial tests. Resolute was in compliance with all terms and covenants of the Credit Facility at June 30, 2012.

Resolute Energy Corporation, the stand-alone parent entity, has insignificant independent assets and no operations. There are no restrictions on the Company’s ability to obtain cash dividends or other distributions of funds from its subsidiaries, except those imposed by applicable law.

Senior Notes

In April 2012, the Company consummated a private placement of $250 million in principal senior notes due May 1, 2020 (the “Senior Notes”). The Senior Notes bear an annual interest rate of 8.50% and were issued at par. The interest on the notes is payable semiannually in cash on May and November 1 of each year, beginning November 1, 2012. Resolute used the proceeds from the issuance to repay outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility, with the remainder reserved for general corporate purposes, including capital expenditures.

- 7 -

of events of default arising from certain events of bankruptcy or insolvency, the Senior Notes shall become due and payable immediately without any declaration or other act of the Trustee or the holders of the Senior Notes. Upon the occurrence of certain other events of default, the Trustee or the holders of the Senior Notes may declare all outstanding Senior Notes to be due and payable immediately. The Company was in compliance with all financial covenants under its Senior Notes as of June 30, 2012.

The Senior Notes are general unsecured senior obligations of the Company and guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by the Guarantors. The Senior notes rank equally in right of payment with all existing and future senior indebtedness of the Company, will be subordinated in right of payment to all existing and future senior secured indebtedness of the Guarantors, will rank senior in right of payment to any future subordinated indebtedness of the Company and will be fully and unconditionally guaranteed by the Guarantors on a senior basis.

The Senior Notes are redeemable by the Company on or after May 1, 2016 on not less than 30 or more than 60 days’ prior notice, at redemption prices set forth in the Indenture. In addition, at any time prior to May 1, 2015, the Company may use the net proceeds from equity offerings and warrant exercises to redeem up to 35% of the principal amount of notes issued under the Indenture at a redemption price equal to 108.50% of the principal amount of the notes redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest. The Senior Notes may also be redeemed at any time prior to May 1, 2016 at the option of the Company at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes redeemed plus the applicable premium, and accrued and unpaid interest and additional interest, if any, to the applicable redemption date as set forth in the Indenture. If a change of control occurs, each holder of the notes will have the right to require that the Company purchase all of such holder’s notes in an amount equal to 101% of the principal of such notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of the purchase.

The fair value of the Senior Notes at June 30, 2012, was estimated to be $248.6 million based upon data from independent market makers, a Level 2 fair value measurement.

The Company capitalized $1.3 million and $0.2 million of interest expense related to the Credit Facility and Senior Notes during the quarters ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The Company capitalized $1.8 million and $0.4 million of interest expense during the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Note 6 — Income Taxes

Income tax expense during interim periods is based on applying an estimated annual effective income tax rate to year-to-date income, plus any significant unusual or infrequently occurring items which are recorded in the interim period. The provision for income taxes for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, differ from the amount that would be provided by applying the statutory U.S. federal income tax rate of 35% to income before income taxes. This difference relates primarily to state income taxes and estimated permanent differences.

The following table summarizes the components of the provision for income taxes (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
Current income tax (expense) benefit	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—
Deferred income tax expense		(13,634	)		(14,926	)		(13,192	)		(5,201	)

Total income tax expense	$	(13,634	)	$	(14,926	)	$	(13,192	)	$	(5,201	)

The Company had no reserve for uncertain tax positions as of June 30, 2012 or 2011.

The Company is subject to the following material taxing jurisdictions: U.S. federal, Colorado, Utah, North Dakota and Texas. The tax years that remain open to examination by the Internal Revenue Service are the years 2008 through 2011. The tax years that remain open to examination by state taxing authorities are 2007 through 2011.

Note 7 — Stockholders’ Equity and Equity Based Awards

Preferred Stock

The Company is authorized to issue up to 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.0001, with such designations, voting and other rights and preferences as may be determined from time to time by the Board of Directors. No shares were issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2012 or December 31, 2011.

- 8 -

Common Stock

The authorized common stock of the Company consists of 225,000,000 shares. The holders of the common shares are entitled to one vote for each share of common stock. In addition, the holders of the common stock are entitled to receive dividends when and if declared by the Board of Directors. At June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company had 61,893,009 and 60,947,329 shares of common stock issued and outstanding, respectively. During the first quarter of 2011, 3,250,000 “Earnout Shares” vested. Earnout Shares are shares of the Company’s common stock that were issued at the time of the merger between the Company and Hicks Acquisition Company I, Inc. in September 2009. These shares had voting rights and were transferable, but were not registered for resale and were not able to participate in dividends until the trading price of the Company’s common stock exceeded $15.00 per share for 20 consecutive trading days. This target was met and the Earnout Shares vested on February 2, 2011.

The Company repurchased 9,634,821 million warrants for aggregate consideration of approximately $10.0 million in a private transaction and an average price of $1.04 per warrant during the second quarter of 2012. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, 5,724,397 warrants were exercised for proceeds to the Company of $74.4 million. During the six months ended June 30, 2012 no warrants were exercised. At June 30, 2012, 33,040,682 million warrants remain outstanding.

Share-Based Compensation

The Company accounts for share-based compensation in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, Stock Compensation.

On July 31, 2009, the Company adopted the 2009 Performance Incentive Plan, providing for long-term share-based awards intended as a means for the Company to attract, motivate, retain and reward directors, officers, employees and other eligible persons through the grant of awards and incentives for high levels of individual performance and improved financial performance of the Company. The share-based awards are intended to further align the interests of award recipients and the Company’s stockholders. The maximum number of common shares that may be issued under the Incentive Plan was increased from 2,657,744 to 9,157,744 pursuant to an amendment to the Incentive Plan that received shareholder approval at the Company’s Annual Meeting on June 2, 2011.

During the six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company granted 964,533 shares of restricted stock to employees and directors, pursuant to the Incentive Plan. Shares of restricted stock issued to employees generally vest in four year increments at specified dates based on continued employment and the satisfaction of certain market performance metrics.

Generally, two-thirds of each grant of restricted stock is time-based and will vest with continued employment in four equal annual tranches. The compensation expense to be recognized for the time-based awards was measured based on the Company’s traded stock price on the dates of grant, utilizing estimated forfeiture rates between 0% and 9%.

The remaining one-third of each grant is subject to the satisfaction of pre-established market performance targets. The performance-based shares will generally vest in equal tranches beginning on December 31^st of the year of the grant if there has been a 10% annual appreciation in the trading price of the Company’s common stock, compounded annually, from the twenty trading day average stock price ended on December 31^st of the year prior to the grant (which was $11.134 for 2010 grants, $14.227 for 2011 grants and $11.639 for 2012 grants). At the end of each year, the twenty trading day average stock price will be measured, and if the 10% threshold is met, the stock subject to the performance criteria will vest. If the 10% threshold is not met, shares that have not vested will be carried forward to the following year subject to a four year maximum vesting period.

The compensation expense to be recognized for the performance-based awards incorporates forfeiture rates and was measured based on the estimated fair value at the date of grant using a binomial lattice model that incorporates a Monte Carlo simulation.

The valuation model for the performance-based awards used the following assumptions:


Grant Year	Average Expected Volatility	Expected Dividend Yield			Risk-Free Interest Rate

2010	70.5% - 76.4%		0	%	1.04% - 1.75%
2011	31.9% - 74.5%		0	%	0.63% - 1.77%
2012	32.1% - 33.0%		0	%	0.56% - 0.85%

- 9 -

For the quarters ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company recorded $2.3 million and $2.1 million of stock based compensation expense, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company recorded $4.1 million and $3.5 million of stock based compensation expense, respectively. There was unrecognized compensation expense for all awards of restricted stock under the Incentive Plan of approximately $17.9 million at June 30, 2012, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.5 years. The following table summarizes the changes in the non-vested restricted stock for the six month period ended June 30, 2012:


	Shares			Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value

Non-vested, beginning of period		1,553,230		$	12.80
Granted		964,533		$	8.37
Vested		(16,557	)	$	13.59
Forfeited		(17,127	)	$	11.61

Non-vested, end of period		2,484,079		$	11.09

Note 8 — Derivative Instruments

Resolute enters into commodity derivative contracts to manage its exposure to oil and gas price volatility. Resolute has not elected to designate derivative instruments as hedges under the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging. As a result, these derivative instruments are marked to market at the end of each reporting period and changes in the fair value are recorded in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations. Realized and unrealized gains and losses from Resolute’s price risk management activities are recognized in other income (expense), with realized gains and losses recognized in the period in which the related production is sold. The cash flows from derivatives are reported as cash flows from operating activities unless the derivative contract is deemed to contain a financing element. Derivatives deemed to contain a financing element are reported as financing activities in the condensed consolidated statement of cash flows.

The Company utilizes fixed price swaps, basis swaps, option contracts and two and three-way collars. These instruments generally entitle Resolute (the floating price payor in most cases) to receive settlement from the counterparty (the fixed price payor in most cases) for each calculation period in amounts, if any, by which the settlement price for the scheduled trading days applicable to each calculation period is less than the fixed strike price or floor price. The Company would pay the counterparty if the settlement price for the scheduled trading days applicable to each calculation period exceeds the fixed strike price or ceiling price. The amount payable by Resolute, if the floating price is above the fixed or ceiling price, is the product of the notional contract quantity and the excess of the floating price over the fixed or ceiling price per calculation period. The amount payable by the counterparty, if the floating price is below the fixed or floor price, is the product of the notional contract quantity and the excess of the fixed or floor price over the floating price per calculation period. A three-way collar consists of a two-way collar contract combined with a put option contract sold by the Company with a strike price below the floor price of the two-way collar. The Company receives price protection at the purchased put option floor price of the two-way collar if commodity prices are above the sold put option strike price. If commodity prices fall below the sold put option strike price, the Company receives the cash market price plus the variance between the two put option strike prices. This type of instrument captures more value in a rising commodity price environment, but limits the benefits in a downward commodity price environment. Basis swaps are used in connection with gas swaps in order to fix the price differential between the NYMEX Henry Hub price and the index price at which the gas production is sold.

During the second quarter of 2012, the Company paid $3.4 million to terminate certain 2012 derivative contracts. As of June 30, 2012, the fair value of the Company’s commodity derivatives was a net liability of $25.7 million.

- 10 -

The following table represents Resolute’s two-way commodity collar contracts as of June 30, 2012.


			(NYMEX WTI -$/Bbl)
Year	Bbl per Day		Weighted Average Floor Price		Weighted Average Ceiling Price
2012		1,375	$	71.64	$	102.45
2013		775	$	80.00	$	105.00
2014		1,500	$	71.00	$	104.00

The following table represents Resolute’s three-way commodity collar contracts as of June 30, 2012.


			(NYMEX WTI -$/Bbl)
Year	Bbl Per Day		Weighted Average Short Put Price		Weighted Average Floor Price		Weighted Average Ceiling Price
2014		1,000	$	70.00	$	80.00	$	95.00

The following table represents Resolute’s commodity option contracts as of June 30, 2012.


			(NYMEX WTI -$/Bbl)
Year	Bbl per Day		Weighted Average Bought Call Price		Weighted Average Sold Call Price
2013		1,000	$	75.00	$	90.00

The following table represents Resolute’s commodity swap contracts as of June 30, 2012.


Year	Bbl per Day		(NYMEX WTI - $/Bbl) Weighted Average Swap Price		MMBtu per Day		(NYMEX HH - $/MMBtu) Weighted Average Swap Price
2012		1,750	$	71.24		2,100	$	7.42
2013		2,000	$	60.47		1,900	$	7.40

The following table sets forth Resolute’s basis swaps as of June 30, 2012.


Year	Index	MMBtu per Day		Weighted Average Price Differential per MMBtu
2012 – 2013	Rocky Mountain NWPL		1,800	$	2.100
2012	Rocky Mountain CIG		1,000	$	0.575
2013	Rocky Mountain CIG		500	$	0.590
2014	Rocky Mountain CIG		1,000	$	0.590

The table below summarizes the location and amount of commodity derivative instrument gains (losses) reported in the condensed consolidated statements of operations (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
Other income (expense):
Realized losses	$	(9,189	)	$	(5,365	)	$	(17,706	)	$	(10,716	)
Unrealized gains (losses)		38,735			27,009			33,423			(7,615	)

Total gains (losses) on derivative instruments	$	29,546		$	21,644		$	15,717		$	(18,331	)

Credit Risk and Contingent Features in Derivative Instruments

Resolute is exposed to credit risk to the extent of nonperformance by the counterparties in the derivative contracts discussed above. All counterparties are lenders under Resolute’s Credit Facility. Accordingly, Resolute is not required to provide any credit support to its counterparties other than cross collateralization with the properties securing the Credit Facility. Resolute’s derivative contracts are documented with industry standard contracts known as a Schedule to the Master Agreement and International Swaps and Derivative Association, Inc. Master Agreement (“ISDA”). Typical terms for each ISDA include credit support requirements, cross default provisions, termination events and set-off provisions. Resolute has set-off provisions with its lenders that, in the event of counterparty default, allow Resolute to set-off amounts owed under the Credit Facility or other general obligations against amounts owed for derivative contract liabilities.

- 11 -

The following is a listing of Resolute’s derivative assets and liabilities required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis and where they are classified within the fair value hierarchy as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 (in thousands):


Description	Level 2
	June 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
Assets
Oil and gas commodity contracts, current assets	$	4,015	$	3,170
Oil and gas commodity contracts, long term assets		2,064		2,291

Total assets	$	6,079	$	5,461


Liabilities
Oil and gas commodity contracts, current liabilities	$	16,576	$	33,910
Oil and gas commodity contracts, long term liabilities		15,229		30,701

Total liabilities	$	31,805	$	64,611

Note 9 — Commitments and Contingencies

CO₂ Take-or-Pay Agreements

Resolute is party to a take-or-pay purchase agreement with Kinder Morgan CO₂ Company, L.P., under which Resolute has committed to buy specified volumes of CO₂. The purchased CO₂ is for use in Resolute’s enhanced tertiary recovery projects in Aneth Field. Resolute is obligated to purchase a minimum daily volume of CO₂ or pay for any deficiencies at the price in effect when delivery was to have occurred. The CO₂volumes planned for use on the enhanced recovery projects generally exceed the minimum daily volumes provided in these take-or-pay purchase agreements. Therefore, Resolute expects to avoid any payments for deficiencies.

Future minimum CO₂ purchase commitments as of June 30, 2012 under this purchase agreement, based on prices in effect on June 30, 2012, are as follows (in thousands):


Year	CO₂ Purchase Commitments
2012	$	8,912
2013		19,152
2014		18,784
2015		14,732
2016		14,773
Thereafter		22,662

Total	$	99,015

Note 10 — Acquisitions and Divestitures

Aneth Field Transactions

During the second quarter of 2012 Resolute entered into two transactions regarding the Aneth Field Properties through which Resolute and Navajo Nation Oil and Gas Company (“NNOG”) consolidated their interests in the field.

In the first transaction, effective January 1, 2012, Resolute and NNOG together, on a 50%/50% basis, acquired a 13% working interest in the Aneth Unit and an 11% working interest in the Ratherford Unit for a total cash consideration of $75 million from affiliates of Denbury Resources Inc. (“Denbury”). The acquisition from Denbury was accounted for using the acquisition method, which requires the acquired assets and liabilities to be recorded at fair value on the acquisition date. After preliminary closing adjustments, the approximate $35.8 million purchase price was allocated to proved oil and gas properties. Revenue and expenses associated with the acquired interests are included in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations concurrent with the closing of the transaction in April, 2012.

Contemporaneously with this transaction, Resolute and NNOG also entered into an amendment of their Cooperative Agreement. Among other changes, this amendment allowed NNOG to exercise options to purchase 10% of the Company’s interest in the Aneth Field Properties, before giving effect to the Denbury transaction discussed above (the “Option Properties”). This option was exercised for cash consideration of $100 million. Resolute entered into a purchase and sale agreement relating to the option exercise which provides that the transaction will be closed and paid for in two equal transfers, each for 5% of Resolute’s interest in the properties. The Company received a $10 million purchase deposit from NNOG in April 2012 which is located on the balance sheet in other long term liabilities. The first transfer took place in July 2012 and the second transfer is expected to take place in January 2013, each with an effective date of January 1, 2012.

- 12 -

The Cooperative Agreement amendment also provides for the cancellation of a second set of options held by NNOG to purchase an additional 10% interest in the Option Properties and stipulates that NNOG has one remaining option to purchase an additional 10% of Resolute’s interest in the Option Properties. The remaining option is exercisable in July 2017 at the current fair market value of such interest at that time.

The net effect of the acquisition of properties from Denbury and the sale of properties to NNOG, following full consummation, is that the Company’s working interests in the Aneth Unit and the Ratherford Unit will remain essentially unchanged at 62% and 59%, respectively, and its working interest in the McElmo Creek Unit will be reduced to 67.5% from 75%. Resolute remains the operator of its properties in Greater Aneth Field.

- 13 -

ITEM 2.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, as well as the accompanying financial statements and related notes contained elsewhere in this report. References to the “Company,” “us,” “our” or “we” refer to Resolute Energy Corporation (“Resolute”) and its subsidiaries.

Overview

Resolute is a publicly traded, independent oil and gas company engaged in the exploitation, development, exploration and acquisition of oil and gas properties. Our primary operational focus is on increasing reserves and production from our properties while improving efficiency and optimizing operating costs. We plan to expand our reserve base through an organic growth strategy focused on the expansion of tertiary oil recovery in our Aneth Field Properties (defined below), the exploitation and development of oil-prone acreage, particularly in our properties in Texas and North Dakota, and through carefully targeted exploration activities in our properties in Wyoming. We also expect to engage in opportunistic acquisitions in our core geographic areas that would allow us to take advantage of our operational expertise.

As of December 31, 2011, Resolute’s estimated net proved reserves were approximately 64.8 MMBoe, of which approximately 44% were proved developed producing reserves, 82% were oil, and 91% were oil and natural gas liquids. The standardized measure of Resolute’s estimated net proved reserves as of December 31, 2011, was $816 million.

Resolute focuses its efforts on increasing reserves and production while controlling costs at a level that is appropriate for long-term operations. Resolute’s future earnings and cash flow from existing operations are dependent on a variety of factors including commodity prices, exploitation and recovery activities and its ability to manage its overall cost structure at a level that allows for profitable operation.

Resolute’s management uses a variety of financial and operational measurements to analyze its operating performance. These measurements include: (i) production levels, trends and prices, (ii) reserve and production volumes and trends, (iii) operating expenses and general and administrative expenses, (iv) operating cash flow and (v) Adjusted EBITDA. The analysis of these measurements should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” contained in Resolute’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Aneth Field Properties

Resolute’s largest asset, constituting 86% of its net proved reserves as of year-end 2011, is its ownership of working interests in Greater Aneth Field, a mature, long-lived oil producing field, most of which is located on the Navajo Reservation in southeast Utah. Resolute owns a majority of the working interests in, and is the operator of, three federal production units which constitute the Aneth Field Properties. These are the Aneth Unit, the McElmo Creek Unit and the Ratherford Unit in which Resolute owned working interests of 68%, 75% and 65%, respectively, at June 30, 2012. The crude oil produced from the Aneth Field Properties is generally characterized as light, sweet crude oil that is highly desired as a refinery blending feedstock. Resolute believes that significantly more oil can be recovered from its Aneth Field Properties through industry standard secondary and tertiary recovery techniques. During the first six months of 2012, the Company drilled 3 gross (2 net) wells on its Aneth Field Properties.

During the second quarter of 2012 we entered into two transactions regarding the Aneth Field Properties through which Resolute and Navajo Nation Oil and Gas Company (“NNOG”) consolidated their interests in the field. In the first transaction, which closed in April, 2012, Resolute entered into an agreement with affiliates of Denbury Resources Inc. (“Denbury”) pursuant to which Resolute and NNOG, on a 50%/50% basis, acquired a 13% working interest in the Aneth Unit and an 11% working interest in the Ratherford Unit for total cash consideration of $75 million (the “Denbury Acquisition”).

Contemporaneously with this transaction, Resolute and NNOG also entered into an amendment to their Cooperative Agreement. Among other changes, this amendment allowed NNOG to exercise options to purchase 10% of the Company’s interest in Aneth Field, before giving effect to the Denbury transaction discussed above. This option was exercised for cash consideration of $100 million. Resolute entered into a purchase and sale agreement relating to the option exercise which provides that the transaction will be closed and paid for in two equal transfers, each for 5% of Resolute’s interest in the properties. The Company received a $10 million purchase deposit from NNOG in April 2012 which is located on the balance sheet in other long term liabilities. The first transfer took place in July 2012 and the second transfer is expected to take place in January 2013, each with an effective date of January 1, 2012.

- 14 -

The Cooperative Agreement amendment also provides for the cancellation of a second set of options held by NNOG to purchase an additional 10% interest in the Aneth Field Properties and stipulates that NNOG has one remaining option to purchase an additional 10% of Resolute’s interest in the Aneth Field Properties (as it stood prior to the current option exercise and excluding the interest acquired from Denbury and certain other minority interests). The remaining option is exercisable in July 2017 at the then current fair market value of such interest.

The net effect of the acquisition of properties from Denbury and the sale of properties to NNOG, following full consummation, is that the Company’s working interests in the Aneth Unit and the Ratherford Unit will remain essentially unchanged at 62% and 59%, respectively, and the working interest in the McElmo Creek Unit will be reduced to 67.5% from 75%. Resolute remains the operator of its Aneth Field Properties.

Wyoming Properties

Resolute’s Wyoming Properties, which are operated by the Company, are located in the Powder River and Big Horn Basins in Wyoming. The producing properties in the Powder River Basin constitute approximately 6% of Resolute’s net proved reserves as of year-end 2011. Hilight Field, anchoring our Wyoming production and reserves, produces oil and gas from the Muddy sandstone and Mowry shale formations.

Resolute has interests in two exploratory areas in Wyoming. The Big Horn Basin has unconventional oil objectives in the Cretaceous Mowry shale and conventional oil objectives in the Permian Phosphoria formation. We are currently testing a horizontal well in the Big Horn Basin targeting the Mowry oil shale formation. To date we appear to have encountered non-commercial quantities of oil. In addition to exploration activities performed by Resolute, two other operators have drilled a total of four additional wells targeting the Mowry shale. In the Powder River Basin, levels of industry activity have increased significantly with various companies pursuing exploration programs targeting objectives including the Turner, Niobrara and Mowry formations. Some of this activity is on acreage directly adjacent to acreage controlled by Resolute. Resolute is currently analyzing a speculative 3D seismic survey covering Hilight Field and adjacent areas that was completed in 2011. This 3D seismic survey should help to delineate oil drilling prospects in the Mowry, and also in the Turner and Niobrara formations.

North Dakota Properties

Resolute has interests in the Bakken shale trend of the Williston Basin in North Dakota (the “North Dakota Properties”). The Company’s position is divided between two principal project areas; the New Home project area located in Williams County and the Paris project area located in McKenzie County. During the first six months of 2012, we placed 14 gross (3.2 net) wells on production and had 4 gross (1.0 net) wells waiting for completion operations.

Texas Properties

Resolute has interests in the Permian Basin of Texas (the “Texas Properties”). The Company’s position is divided between two principal project areas. The Wolfbone project area is located in the Delaware Basin portion of the Permian Basin in Reeves County, and the Wolfberry project area is located in the Midland Basin portion of the Permian Basin in Howard and Martin counties. During the first six months of 2012, we drilled and completed 7 gross (4.6 net) wells and had 1 gross (0.5 net) wells waiting on completion operations.

Factors That Significantly Affect Resolute’s Financial Results

Revenue, cash flow from operations and future growth depend substantially on factors beyond Resolute’s control, such as economic, political and regulatory developments and competition from other sources of energy. Crude oil prices have historically been volatile and may fluctuate widely in the future. Sustained periods of low prices for crude oil could materially and adversely affect Resolute’s financial position, its results of operations, the quantities of oil and gas that it can economically produce, and its ability to obtain capital.

Like all businesses engaged in the exploration for and production of oil and gas, Resolute faces the challenge of natural production declines. As initial reservoir pressures are depleted, oil and gas production from a given well decreases. Thus, an oil and gas exploration and production company depletes part of its asset base with each unit of oil or gas it produces. Resolute attempts to overcome this natural decline by implementing secondary and tertiary recovery techniques and by developing and acquiring more reserves than it produces. Resolute’s future growth will depend on its ability to enhance production levels from existing reserves and to continue to add reserves in excess of production through exploration, development and acquisition. Resolute will maintain its focus on costs necessary to produce its reserves as well as the costs necessary to add reserves through production enhancement, drilling and acquisitions. Resolute’s ability to make capital expenditures to increase production from existing reserves and to acquire more reserves is dependent on availability of capital resources, and can be limited by many factors, including the ability to obtain capital in a cost-effective manner and on economic terms and to timely obtain permits and regulatory approvals.

- 15 -

Results of Operations

For the purposes of management’s discussion and analysis of the results of operations of Resolute, management has analyzed the Company’s operational results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The following table reflects the components of the Company’s sales volumes and sets forth its sales prices, costs and expenses on a barrel of oil equivalent (“Boe”) basis for the periods indicated.


	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
Net Sales:
Total sales (MBoe)		858		1 729		1,620		1,436
Average daily sales (Boe/d)		9,427		8,012		8,903		7,936

Average Sales Price ($/Boe):
Average sales price (excluding derivative settlements)	$	75.16	$	82.17	$	79.01	$	79.34

Operating Expenses ($/Boe):
Lease operating	$	22.81	$	18.55	$	22.68	$	19.43
Production and ad valorem taxes		11.24		11.29		12.26		11.16
General and administrative		6.64		6.52		6.73		6.34
General and administrative (excluding non-cash compensation expense)		4.17		3.79		4.38		4.00
Depletion, depreciation, amortization and accretion		22.10		18.78		22.23		18.56

Comparison of Quarter Ended June 30, 2012 to Quarter Ended June 30, 2011

Revenue. Revenue from oil and gas activities increased by 8%, to $64.5 million during 2012 from $59.9 million during 2011. Of the net $4.6 million increase in revenue, approximately $10.6 million was attributable to increased production, offset by $6.0 million in lower commodity prices. Average sales price for the quarter, excluding derivative settlements, decreased from $82.17 per Boe in 2011 to $75.16 per Boe in 2012, primarily as a function of decreased commodity pricing. Sales volumes increased 18% during 2012 as compared to 2011, from 729 MBoe to 858 MBoe. The increase is mainly due to increased production from new wells in the Texas and North Dakota Properties and the purchase of interests in the Aneth Field Properties from Denbury.

Operating Expenses. Lease operating expenses include direct labor, contract services, field office rent, production and ad valorem taxes, vehicle expenses, supervision, transportation, minor maintenance, tools and supplies, workover expenses, utilities and other customary charges. Resolute assesses lease operating expenses in part by monitoring the expenses in relation to production volumes and the number of wells operated.

Aggregate lease operating expenses increased to $19.6 million during 2012, from $13.5 million during 2011. The $6.0 million, or 45%, increase was attributable to the additional working interests acquired in the Denbury Acquisition, expanded operations in the Texas and North Dakota Properties and increased workover activity in the Aneth Field Properties. On a unit-of-production basis, lease operating expense increased 23% from $18.55 in 2011 to $22.81 in 2012.

Production and ad valorem taxes increased by 17% to $9.6 million in 2012, versus $8.2 million in 2011, due to the increase in production over 2011 combined with higher ad valorem tax estimates as a result of increases in the assessed value of reserves in 2012. Production and ad valorem taxes were 15% of total revenue in 2012 versus 14% of total revenue in 2011.

Depletion, depreciation, amortization and accretion expenses increased to $19.0 million during 2012, as compared to $13.7 million during 2011. The $5.3 million, or 38%, increase is principally due to an increase in the depletion, depreciation and amortization rate from $18.78 per Boe in 2011 to $22.10 per Boe in 2012 as a result of increased finding costs on new drilling and completion activities.

General and administrative expenses include the costs of employees and executive officers, related benefits, share-based compensation, office leases, professional fees, general corporate overhead and other costs not directly associated with field operations. Resolute monitors its general and administrative expenses carefully, attempting to balance the cash effect of incurring general and administrative costs against the related benefits with a focus on hiring and retaining highly qualified staff who can add value to the Company’s asset base.

- 16 -

General and administrative expenses for Resolute increased to $5.7 million during 2012, as compared to $4.8 million during 2011. The $0.9 million, or 20%, increase in general and administrative expenses mainly resulted from increases of $1.2 million in salaries and wages, $0.1 million in professional services, $0.1 million in corporate overheard, offset by increases in capitalized labor and overhead billings. On a unit-of-production basis, general and administrative expenses increased 2%.

Other Income (Expense). All of our oil and gas derivative instruments are accounted for under mark-to-market accounting rules, which provide for the fair value of the contracts to be reflected as either an asset or a liability on the balance sheet. The change in the fair value during an accounting period is reflected in the income statement for that period.

During 2012, the gain on oil and gas derivatives was $29.5 million, consisting of $38.7 million of unrealized gains and $9.2 million of realized losses. During 2011, the gain on oil and gas derivatives was $21.6 million, consisting of $27.0 million of unrealized losses and $5.4 million of realized losses on derivative settlements.

Interest expense in 2012 increased to $3.7 million from the $0.8 million recorded in 2011 due to the higher interest rate associated with the private placement of $250 million in principal senior notes due May 1, 2020 (the “Senior Notes”) in April 2012 and increased average borrowings versus the second quarter of 2011.

Income Tax Benefit (Expense). Income tax expense recognized during 2012 was $13.6 million, or 37.4% of income before income taxes, as compared to income tax expense of $14.9 million, or 36.8% of income before income taxes in 2011.

Comparison of Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 to Six Months Ended June 30, 2011

Revenue. Revenue from oil and gas activities increased by 12% to $128.0 million during 2012, from $114.0 million during 2011. Of the net $14.0 million increase in revenue, approximately $14.5 million was attributable to increased production offset by $0.5 million of lower commodity prices. Average sales price for the quarter, excluding derivative settlements, decreased from $79.34 per Boe in 2011 to $79.01 per Boe in 2012, primarily as a function of decreased commodity pricing. Sales volumes increased 12% during 2012 as compared to 2011, from 1,436 MBoe to 1,620 MBoe. The increase is mainly due to increased production from new wells in the Texas Properties and North Dakota Properties and the purchase of interests in the Aneth Field Properties from Denbury.

Operating Expenses. Aggregate lease operating expenses increased to $36.7 million during 2012, from $27.9 million during 2011. The $8.8 million, or 32%, increase was attributable to higher service and supply costs during the first quarter, the additional working interests acquired in the Denbury acquisition, expanded operations in the Texas and North Dakota Properties and increased workover activity in the Aneth Field Properties. On a unit-of-production basis, the increase was 17%.

Production and ad valorem taxes increased by 24% to $19.9 million in 2012, versus $16.0 million in 2011, due to the increase in production over 2011 combined with higher ad valorem tax estimates associated with the increases in the assessed value of reserves in 2012. Production and ad valorem taxes were 16% of total revenue in 2012 versus 14% of total revenue in 2011.

Depletion, depreciation, amortization and accretion expenses increased to $36.0 million during 2012, as compared to $26.7 million during 2011. The $9.3 million, or 35%, increase is principally due to an increase in the depletion, depreciation and amortization rate from $18.56 per Boe in 2011 to $22.23 per Boe in 2012 as a result of increased finding costs on new drilling and completion activities.

General and administrative expenses for Resolute increased to $10.9 million during 2012, as compared to $9.1 million during 2011. The $1.8 million, or 20%, increase in general and administrative expenses resulted from increases of $2.1 million in salaries and wages, $0.4 million in share based compensation expense, $0.1 million in professional services, $0.1 million corporate overhead, offset by increases in capitalized labor and overhead billings. On a unit-of-production basis, general and administrative expenses increased 6%.

Other Income (Expense). During 2012, the gain on oil and gas derivatives was $15.7 million, consisting of $33.4 million of unrealized gains and $17.7 million of realized losses. During 2011, the loss on oil and gas derivatives was $18.3 million, consisting of $7.6 million of unrealized losses and $10.7 million of realized losses on derivative settlements.

- 17 -

Interest expense in 2012 increased to $4.9 million from the $1.9 million recorded in 2011 as a result of the higher interest rate associated with the Senior Notes issuance in 2012 and increased average borrowings.

Income Tax Benefit (Expense). Income tax expense recognized during 2012 was $13.2 million, or 37.4% of income before income taxes, as compared to income tax expense of $5.2 million, or 36.9% of the income before income taxes during 2011.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Resolute’s primary sources of liquidity have been cash generated from operations, amounts available under its revolving Credit Facility (as defined below), proceeds from warrant exercises, sales of non-strategic oil and gas properties and proceeds from the Senior Notes issuance. For the purposes of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Liquidity and Capital Resources, management has analyzed the cash flows and capital resources for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011.


	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012			2011
	(in thousands)
Cash provided by operating activities	$	40,570		$	50,084
Cash used in investing activities		(127,104	)		(64,426	)
Cash provided by financing activities		88,251			12,872

Net cash provided by operating activities was $40.6 million for the first six months of 2012 compared to $50.1 million for the 2011 period, which reflects increased production, offset by decreased commodity prices realized in 2012 and increases in accounts receivable.

Net cash used in investing activities was $127.1 million in 2012 compared to $64.4 million in 2011. The primary investing activity in 2012 was cash used for capital expenditures of $134.2 million. Capital expenditures were comprised of $23.4 million in compression, facility and drilling projects in Aneth Field, $35.8 million in the Denbury Acquisition, $7.8 million in CO₂ acquisition, $30.7 million in drilling activities and infrastructure projects in the Permian Basin of West Texas, $33.6 million in drilling and completion activities in the Bakken trend of North Dakota, $7.2 million in recompletion and drilling activities in the Company’s Wyoming properties and $0.2 million in other capital projects. A portion of these capital costs are accrued and not paid at period end. The 2011 capital expenditures were comprised of $30.0 million in compression and facility related projects, $8.8 million in CO₂ acquisition, $12.2 million in drilling and completion activities in the Bakken trend of North Dakota, $23.0 million in leasehold costs and drilling activities in the Delaware Basin of West Texas and $3.2 million in recompletion activities in the Company’s Wyoming properties.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $88.3 million in 2012 and $12.9 million in 2011. The primary financing activities in 2012 were $250.0 million in proceeds received from the issuance of the Senior Notes offset by net payments of $143.0 million under the Credit Facility, and $10.0 million paid to retire publicly traded Company warrants. Primary financing activities in 2011 were $74.4 million in proceeds from warrants exercised and $61.4 million in net payments under the Credit Facility. The Company is unable to predict the amount or timing of future warrant exercises.

Resolute plans to reinvest a sufficient amount of its cash flow in its development operations in order to maintain its production over the long term, and plans to use external financing sources as well as cash flow from operations and cash reserves to increase its production.

If cash flow from operating activities does not satisfy its capital requirements, Resolute may reduce its expected level of capital expenditures and/or fund a portion of its capital expenditures using borrowings under its Credit Facility, issuances of debt and equity securities or from other sources, such as asset sales. The Company has in place an effective universal shelf registration statement pursuant to which an aggregate amount of $500 million of any such equity or debt securities could be issued. There can be no assurance that needed capital will be available on acceptable terms or at all. Resolute’s ability to raise funds through the incurrence of additional indebtedness could be limited by the covenants in its Credit Facility and the indenture governing the Senior Notes. If Resolute is unable to obtain funds when needed or on acceptable terms, it may not be able to complete acquisitions that could be favorable to it or finance the capital expenditures necessary to maintain production or proved reserves.

Resolute plans to continue its practice of hedging a significant portion of its production through the use of various derivative transactions. Resolute’s existing derivative transactions do not qualify as cash flow hedges, and the Company anticipates that future transactions will receive similar accounting treatment. Derivative arrangements are generally settled within five days of the end of the month. As is typical in the oil and gas industry, however, Resolute does not generally receive the proceeds from the sale of its crude oil production until the 20th day of the month following the month of production. As a result, when commodity prices increase above the fixed price in the derivative contacts, Resolute will be required to pay the derivative counterparty the difference between the fixed price in the derivative contract and the market price before receiving the proceeds from the sale of the hedged production. If this occurs, Resolute may use Credit Facility borrowings to fund its operations.

- 18 -

Revolving Credit Facility

- 19 -

Senior Notes

The Senior Notes bear an annual interest rate of 8.50% and were issued at par. The interest on the notes is payable semiannually in cash on May and November 1 of each year, beginning November 1, 2012. Resolute used the proceeds from the issuance to repay outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility with the remainder reserved for general corporate purposes, including capital expenditures.

The Senior Notes were issued under an Indenture (the “Indenture”) among the Company, the Company’s existing subsidiaries (the “Guarantors”) and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (the “Trustee”) in a private transaction not subject to the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933. The Indenture contains affirmative and negative covenants that, among other things, limit the Company’s and the Guarantors’ ability to make investments, incur additional indebtedness or issue preferred stock, create liens, sell assets, enter into agreements that restrict dividends or other payments by restricted subsidiaries, consolidate, merge or transfer all or substantially all of the assets of the Company, engage in transactions with the Company’s affiliates, pay dividends or make other distributions on capital stock or prepay subordinated indebtedness and create unrestricted subsidiaries. The Indenture also contains customary events of default. Upon occurrence of events of default arising from certain events of bankruptcy or insolvency, the Senior Notes shall become due and payable immediately without any declaration or other act of the Trustee or the holders of the Senior Notes. Upon the occurrence of certain other events of default, the Trustee or the holders of the Senior Notes may declare all outstanding Senior Notes to be due and payable immediately. The Company was in compliance with all financial covenants under its Senior Notes as of June 30, 2012.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

Resolute does not have any off-balance sheet financing arrangements other than operating leases. Resolute has not guaranteed any debt or commitments of other entities or entered into any options on non-financial assets.

ITEM 3.

QUANTITIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Commodity Price Risk and Derivative Arrangements

Resolute’s major market risk exposure is in the pricing applicable to oil and gas production. Realized pricing on Resolute’s unhedged volumes of production is primarily driven by the spot market prices applicable to oil production and the prevailing price for gas. Pricing for oil production has been volatile and unpredictable for several years, and Resolute expects this volatility to continue in the future. The prices Resolute receives for unhedged production depends on many factors outside of Resolute’s control.

Resolute periodically hedges a portion of its oil and gas production through swaps, puts, calls, collars and other such agreements. The purpose of the hedges is to provide a measure of stability to Resolute’s cash flows in an environment of volatile oil and gas prices and to manage Resolute’s exposure to commodity price risk.

Under the terms of Resolute’s Credit Facility, the form of derivative instruments to be entered into is at Resolute’s discretion, not to exceed (i) 85% of our anticipated production from proved properties in the two years following entering into a derivative transaction and (ii) the greater of 75% of our anticipated production from proved properties or 85% of our anticipated production from proved developed producing properties thereafter, with no such hedges extending beyond five years.

By removing the price volatility from a significant portion of Resolute’s oil production, Resolute has mitigated, but not eliminated, the potential effects of changing prices on the cash flow from operations for those periods. While mitigating

- 20 -

negative effects of falling commodity prices, certain of these derivative contracts also limit the benefits Resolute would receive from increases in commodity prices. It is Resolute’s policy to enter into derivative contracts only with counterparties that are major, creditworthy financial institutions deemed by management as competent and competitive market makers, all of which are members of Resolute’s Credit Facility bank syndicate at June 30, 2012. As of June 30, 2012, the fair value of our commodity derivatives was a net liability of $25.7 million.

The following table represents Resolute’s two-way commodity collar contracts as of June 30, 2012.


			(NYMEX WTI -$/Bbl)
Year	Bbl per Day		Weighted Average Floor Price		Weighted Average Ceiling Price
2012		1,375	$	71.64	$	102.45
2013		775	$	80.00	$	105.00
2014		1,500	$	71.00	$	104.00

The following table represents Resolute’s three-way commodity collar contracts as of June 30, 2012.


			(NYMEX WTI -$/Bbl)
Year	Bbl Per Day		Weighted Average Short Put Price		Weighted Average Floor Price		Weighted Average Ceiling Price
2014		1,000	$	70.00	$	80.00	$	95.00

The following table represents Resolute’s commodity option contracts as of June 30, 2012.


			(NYMEX WTI -$/Bbl)
Year	Bbl per Day		Weighted Average Bought Call Price		Weighted Average Sold Call Price
2013		1,000	$	75.00	$	90.00

The following table represents Resolute’s commodity swap contracts as of June 30, 2012.


Year	Bbl per Day		(NYMEX WTI - $/Bbl) Weighted Average Swap Price		MMBtu per Day		(NYMEX HH - $/MMBtu) Weighted Average Swap Price
2012		1,750	$	71.24		2,100	$	7.42
2013		2,000	$	60.47		1,900	$	7.40

The following table sets forth Resolute’s outstanding basis swaps as of June 30, 2012.


Year	Index	MMBtu per Day		Weighted Average Price Differential per MMBtu
2012 – 2013	Rocky Mountain NWPL		1,800	$	2.100
2012	Rocky Mountain CIG		1,000	$	0.575
2013	Rocky Mountain CIG		500	$	0.590
2014	Rocky Mountain CIG		1,000	$	0.590

Interest Rate Risk

At June 30, 2012, Resolute had $27.0 million of outstanding floating rate debt. Interest is calculated under the terms of the agreement based generally on a prime rate or LIBOR spread. A 10% increase in either the prime rate or LIBOR would result in a less than $0.1 million increase in annual interest expense. Resolute does not currently intend to enter into any derivative arrangements to protect against fluctuations in interest rates applicable to its outstanding indebtedness.

Credit Risk and Contingent Features in Derivative Instruments

Resolute is exposed to credit risk to the extent of nonperformance by the counterparties in the derivative contracts discussed above. All counterparties are also lenders under Resolute’s Credit Facility. For these contracts, Resolute is not required to provide any credit support to its counterparties other than cross collateralization with the properties securing the Credit Facility. Resolute’s derivative contracts are documented with industry standard contracts known as a Schedule to the Master Agreement and International Swaps and Derivative Association, Inc. Master Agreement (“ISDA”). Typical terms for the ISDAs include credit support requirements, cross default provisions, termination events, and set-off provisions. Resolute has set-off provisions with its lenders that, in the event of counterparty default, allow Resolute to set-off amounts owed under the Credit Facility or other general obligations against amounts owed for derivative contract liabilities.

- 21 -

ITEM 4.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Our management, with the participation of Nicholas J. Sutton, our Chief Executive Officer, and Theodore Gazulis, our Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2012. Based on the evaluation, those officers have concluded that:

•

our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.

•

our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 was accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

There has not been any change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

- 22 -

PART II -

OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Resolute is not a party to any material pending legal or governmental proceedings, other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to its business. While the ultimate outcome and impact of any proceeding cannot be predicted with certainty, Resolute’s management believes that the resolution of any of its pending proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations.

ITEM 1A.

RISK FACTORS

Information about material risks related to Resolute’s business, financial condition and results of operations for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, does not materially differ from those set out in Part I, Item 1A of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 and the quarterly report for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 on Form 10-Q. These risks are not the only risks facing the Company.

ITEM 2.

UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

In connection with the vesting of Resolute Energy Corporation restricted common stock under the 2009 Performance Incentive Plan (“Incentive Plan”), the Company retains shares of common stock at the election of the recipients of such awards in satisfaction of withholding tax obligations. These shares are retired by the Company.

In June 2012, Resolute acquired publicly-traded warrants from an affiliate of Raymond James in a single transaction. The repurchased warrants have been retired.


2012	Total Number of Units Purchased⁽¹⁾		Average Price Paid Per Unit		Total Number of Units Purchased as Part of Publically Announced Plan		Maximum Number of Units That May Yet Be Purchased Under The Plan⁽²⁾

June		1,636 common shares	$	8.85		—		—
June		9,634,821 warrants	$	1.04		—		—

1)	All common shares purchased in 2012 were to offset tax withholding obligations that occur upon the vesting and delivery of outstanding common shares under the terms of the Incentive Plan.

2)	As of June 30, 2012, the maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased would not exceed the employees’ portion of taxes withheld on unvested shares (2,484,079 common shares) and the shares yet to be granted under the Incentive Plan (5,873,347 common shares).

ITEM 3.

DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

Not applicable

ITEM 4.

MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable

ITEM 5.

OTHER INFORMATION

Not applicable.

- 23 -

ITEM 6.

EXHIBITS


Exhibit Number		Description of Exhibits

31.1		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith)

31.2		Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith)

32.1		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith)

101		The following materials from the Resolute Energy Corporation Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) include (i) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity, (iv) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (v) Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

- 24 -

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


Signature	Capacity	Date

/s/ Nicholas J. Sutton
Nicholas J. Sutton	Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)	August 6, 2012

/s/ Theodore Gazulis
Theodore Gazulis	Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)	August 6, 2012

- 25 -

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company