UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Filed by the Registrant ☒ Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐
Check the appropriate box:
☐ | Preliminary Proxy Statement | |
☐ | Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) | |
☒ | Definitive Proxy Statement | |
☐ | Definitive Additional Materials | |
☐ | Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 |
INFINERA CORPORATION
(Name of registrant as specified in its charter)
(Name of person(s) filing proxy statement, if other than the registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
☒ | No fee required. | |||
☐ | Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. | |||
(1) | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
| |||
(2) | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
| |||
(3) | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
| |||
(4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
| |||
(5) | Total fee paid: | |||
| ||||
☐ | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. | |||
☐ | Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. | |||
(1) | Amount Previously Paid:
| |||
(2) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
| |||
(3) | Filing Party:
| |||
(4) | Date Filed:
|
Infinera Corporation
140 Caspian Court
Sunnyvale, California 94089
NOTICE OF 2017 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To Be Held on May 25, 2017
10:00 a.m. Pacific Time
Dear Stockholder:
You are cordially invited to attend the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the Annual Meeting) of Infinera Corporation, a Delaware corporation. Notice is hereby given that the meeting will be held on Thursday, May 25, 2017, at 140 Caspian Court, Sunnyvale, California 94089 at 10:00 a.m. Pacific Time, for the following purposes:
1. | To elect to the Board of Directors the three nominees for Class I directors named in the Proxy Statement; |
2. | To approve an amendment to the Infinera Corporation 2016 Equity Incentive Plan to increase the number of shares authorized for issuance thereunder by 6,400,000 shares; |
3. | To approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of Infineras named executive officers, as described in the Proxy Statement; |
4. | To approve, on an advisory basis, the frequency of stockholder advisory votes on the compensation of Infineras named executive officers; |
5. | To ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as Infineras independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 30, 2017; and |
6. | To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any postponement or adjournment thereof. |
These items of business are more fully described in the Proxy Statement accompanying this Notice.
The record date for the Annual Meeting is April 4, 2017. Only stockholders of record at the close of business on that date may vote at the Annual Meeting or any postponement or adjournment thereof. A list of our stockholders will be maintained and open for examination by any of our stockholders, for any purpose germane to the Annual Meeting, during regular business hours at the address listed above for ten days prior to the meeting.
We are pleased to inform you that we will again be utilizing the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission rules that allow issuers to furnish proxy materials to their stockholders via the Internet. We believe that these rules allow us to provide our stockholders with the information they need more quickly and conveniently, while lowering the cost of delivery and reducing the environmental impact of the Annual Meeting.
As a stockholder, your vote is important. Whether or not you expect to attend the Annual Meeting in person, it is important that you vote as soon as possible so that your shares are represented. To vote your shares, please follow the instructions in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, which is being mailed to you on or about April 13, 2017.
On behalf of the Board of Directors, thank you for your participation in this important annual process.
By Order of the Board, |
/s/ JAMES L. LAUFMAN |
James L. Laufman |
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary |
Sunnyvale, California |
April 12, 2017 |
ii | ||||
ii | ||||
ii | ||||
ii | ||||
iii | ||||
iii | ||||
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE PROXY MATERIALS AND VOTING PROCEDURAL MATTERS |
1 | |||
1 | ||||
3 | ||||
3 | ||||
5 | ||||
7 | ||||
7 | ||||
7 | ||||
7 | ||||
12 | ||||
12 | ||||
12 | ||||
12 | ||||
12 | ||||
13 | ||||
13 | ||||
13 | ||||
13 | ||||
17 | ||||
18 | ||||
18 | ||||
18 | ||||
19 | ||||
Additional Information with Respect to Director Equity Awards |
19 | |||
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT |
20 | |||
22 | ||||
22 | ||||
Overview of our Executive Compensation Program Philosophy and Process |
26 | |||
30 | ||||
36 | ||||
39 | ||||
40 | ||||
40 | ||||
41 | ||||
Fiscal 2016 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End Table |
42 | |||
44 | ||||
Estimated Payments and Benefits upon Termination, Change of Control or Death/Disability |
44 | |||
46 | ||||
47 | ||||
48 | ||||
PROPOSAL 3ADVISORY APPROVAL OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION |
57 | |||
58 | ||||
PROPOSAL 5RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM |
59 | |||
59 | ||||
60 | ||||
61 | ||||
62 | ||||
62 | ||||
63 | ||||
63 | ||||
DELIVERY OF DOCUMENTS TO STOCKHOLDERS SHARING THE SAME LAST NAME AND ADDRESS |
64 | |||
65 | ||||
A-1 | ||||
B-1 |
i
INFINERA CORPORATION
This summary highlights selected information contained elsewhere in this Proxy Statement. The summary does not contain all of the information that you should consider, and you should read and consider carefully the complete Proxy Statement before voting. Infinera Corporation is referred to herein as Infinera, we, us and our.
2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
Time and Date: |
10:00 a.m. Pacific Time, on Thursday, May 25, 2017 | |
Place: |
Infinera Corporation, 140 Caspian Court, Sunnyvale, California 94089 | |
Record Date: |
April 4, 2017 | |
Voting: |
Stockholders as of the record date are entitled to vote. Each share of common stock is entitled to one vote for each director nominee and one vote for each of the other proposals to be voted on. |
Meeting Agenda and Voting Matters
Agenda Items |
Board Vote Recommendation |
Page Reference (for more detail) | ||
1. To elect to the Board of Directors the three nominees for Class I directors named in the Proxy Statement. |
FOR EACH DIRECTOR NOMINEE |
7 | ||
2. To approve an amendment to the Infinera Corporation 2016 Equity Incentive Plan to increase the number of shares authorized for issuance thereunder by 6,400,000 shares. |
FOR | 48 | ||
3. To approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of Infineras named executive officers, as described in the Proxy Statement. |
FOR | 57 | ||
4. To approve, on an advisory basis, the frequency of stockholder advisory votes on the compensation of Infineras named executive officers. |
1 YEAR | 58 | ||
5. To ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as Infineras independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 30, 2017. |
FOR | 59 | ||
6. To transact such other business that may properly come before the meeting or any postponement or adjournment thereof. |
Name |
Age | Director Since | Independent(1) | Committee Memberships | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
AC | CC | NGC | TAC | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Thomas J. Fallon |
55 | 2009 | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Kambiz Y. Hooshmand(2) |
55 | 2009 | X | M | | M | M | |||||||||||||||||||||
Rajal M. Patel |
48 | 2015 | X | | | M | M |
AC = Audit Committee; CC = Compensation Committee; NGC = Nominating and Governance Committee
TAC = Technology and Acquisition Committee; M = Member
(1) | Under the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the listing standards of The NASDAQ Stock Market (NASDAQ). |
(2) | Mr. Hooshmand currently serves as Chairman of the Board. |
ii
Board and Governance Highlights
Board Independence. Six out of eight of our directors are independent.
Board Composition. The size of the Board of Directors is fixed at eight and is divided into three classes. The Board of Directors annually assesses its performance through a board self-evaluation.
Board Tenure. The average tenure of our current board members is 4.9 years. We have appointed three new directors in the last three years.
Board Diversity. The Board of Directors consists of a diverse group of professionals who bring significant leadership and distinct qualities to Infinera. This group provides a diverse range of perspectives and experience to engage each other and management to effectively represent our stockholders.
Board Committees. We have four committees of the Board of DirectorsAudit, Compensation, Nominating and Governance, and Technology and Acquisition. With the exception of the Technology and Acquisition Committee (David F. Welch, our President, serves on this committee), all other committees are composed entirely of independent directors.
Leadership Structure. We have separated the positions of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (CEO).
Director Stock Ownership. Each non-employee director is required to own shares of Infinera common stock having a value of at least four times the annual cash retainer.
Risk Oversight. Members of our senior management team are responsible for implementation of our day-to-day risk management processes, while the Board of Directors, as a whole and through its committees, has responsibility for the oversight of overall risk management.
Executive Compensation Program Highlights
Our executive compensation program continues to be designed to balance near-term results with long-term success and continues to encourage our executive officers (including our named executive officers (NEOs) for fiscal 2016) to build value through innovation and execution. To fulfill this mission, we have a pay-for-performance philosophy that forms the foundation for all decisions regarding executive compensation made by the Compensation Committee. As explained in more detail in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement, the design of our executive compensation program for fiscal 2016 promoted the continued strong alignment of the interests of our executive officers with those of our stockholders. Highlights of our executive compensation program for fiscal 2016 included:
| The majority of our CEOs fiscal 2016 target total direct compensation was in equity. |
| 69% of our CEOs target total direct compensation (the sum of base salary, target cash incentive opportunity and target equity incentive compensation at grant date fair value) was in the form of equity awards, which links our CEOs compensation directly to the value of our common stock. In fiscal 2016, our CEO received a performance-based restricted stock unit (PSU) award for 135,990 shares of our common stock (at target attainment) and a time-based restricted stock unit (RSU) award for 86,850 shares of our common stock. |
iii
| The majority of our CEOs fiscal 2016 target total direct compensation and target equity incentive compensation were at risk. |
| 58% of our CEOs target total direct compensation was fully at risk. This significant portion of his compensation was based on our performance against measurable performance objectives set forth under the fiscal 2016 bonus plan (the 2016 Bonus Plan) and PSU award. |
| 60% of our CEOs target equity incentive compensation was in the form of a PSU award. The PSU award could be earned based on our relative total stockholder return (TSR) performance measured over three performance periods against the Standard & Poors North American Technology Multimedia Networking Index (S&P Networking Index) (the 2016 TSR Award). |
| Our fiscal 2016 PSU awards included rigorous performance requirements. The 2016 TSR Award is consistent with prior year awards that measured our stock performance against a networking index. To support our pay-for-performance philosophy and further emphasize the importance of creating long-term stockholder value, the 2016 TSR Award contained several features we consider to be best practices. |
| Sustained performance requirement. To earn the maximum number of shares under the 2016 TSR Award, which is 200% of the target number of shares, our TSR must exceed that of the S&P Networking Index by 50 points or more as calculated on each of the one-, two- and three-year measurement periods (coinciding with the end of our fiscal 2016, 2017 and 2018). |
| Steeper downside risk. The number of shares that may be earned under the 2016 TSR Award is reduced one and one-half times faster if our TSR underperforms the S&P Networking Index (3-to-1 downside) than it is increased if our TSR outperforms the S&P Networking Index (2-to-1 upside). For example, if we underperform the S&P Networking Index by 10 points of TSR, 70% of the target number of shares subject to the award would be earned. If we outperform the S&P Networking Index by 10 points of TSR, 120% of the target number of shares subject to the award would be earned. |
| Payment cap. Regardless of our performance versus the S&P Networking Index, the number of shares that may be earned under the 2016 TSR Award is capped at 100% of target for any period in which our TSR is negative. Therefore, even if we significantly outperform the S&P Networking Index in challenging market conditions, this award only provides rewards above the target performance level if incremental stockholder value is created. |
| Our fiscal 2016 payouts reflect our pay-for-performance philosophy. Our fiscal 2016 payouts reflect the alignment of our executive compensation program to the performance of Infinera. As indicated above, a significant portion of our executive compensation program is designed to align the compensation outcomes for our NEOs on performance against measurable objectives. Our fiscal 2016 revenue and non-GAAP operating income results were lower compared to fiscal 2015 and did not meet the minimum threshold established by the Compensation Committee under the 2016 Bonus Plan, resulting in no payout for the financial component of the plan. During fiscal 2016, there were portions of four PSU awards for which payout was based entirely or in part on our performance during the year. We underperformed as compared to the S&P Networking Index for each of our fiscal 2016 PSU awards, fiscal 2015 PSU awards and fiscal 2014 PSU awards, which resulted in no payouts for each of the performance periods that concluded at the end of fiscal 2016. The fourth PSU award was tied to the achievement of a pre-established minimum revenue target for sales of our then-new Cloud Xpress family of products (the CX PSU Award). At the end of the performance period we exceeded the minimum revenue target for sales, which resulted in a payout at 136% of target. |
iv
| We continue to maintain sound corporate governance policies and practices. We seek to maintain sound corporate governance standards and during fiscal 2016, the following policies and practices continued to be in effect: |
Executive Clawback Policy Anti-Hedging Policy No Pledging of our Common Stock by NEOs Fully Independent Compensation Committee Stock Ownership Policy No Guaranteed Bonuses |
Majority Voting for the Election of Directors Double-Trigger Change-of-Control Agreements Annual Compensation Risk Assessment No Executive Perquisites Independent Compensation Consultant Reporting Directly to Compensation Committee No Tax Gross-Ups |
v
PROXY STATEMENT
2017 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE PROXY MATERIALS
AND VOTING PROCEDURAL MATTERS
Q: | Why am I being provided access to these proxy materials? |
A: | The Board of Directors (the Board) of Infinera is providing you access to these proxy materials in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board for use at the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the Annual Meeting) to be held on Thursday, May 25, 2017 at 10:00 a.m. Pacific Time, and at any adjournment or postponement thereof, for the purpose of considering and acting upon the matters described herein. These materials were first sent or given to stockholders on or about April 13, 2017. |
Q: | What is the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials? |
A: | In accordance with rules and regulations adopted by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC), instead of mailing a printed copy of our proxy materials to all stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting, Infinera is furnishing the proxy materials to its stockholders via the Internet. If you received a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the Notice) by mail, you will not receive a printed copy of the proxy materials. Instead, the Notice will instruct you as to how you may access and review the proxy materials and submit your vote via the Internet. If you received a Notice by mail and would like to receive a printed copy of the proxy materials, please follow the instructions for requesting such materials included in the Notice. |
Choosing to receive the Notice by email will save us the cost of printing and mailing the documents to you and will reduce the impact of the Annual Meeting on the environment. If you choose to receive the Notice by email, you will receive an email next year with instructions containing a link to the proxy materials and a link to the proxy voting site. Your election to receive the Notice by email will remain in effect until you terminate it.
On the date of mailing of the Notice, all stockholders of record and beneficial owners will have the ability to access all of our proxy materials on a website referred to in the Notice. These proxy materials will be available free of charge.
Q: | Where is the Annual Meeting? |
A: | The Annual Meeting will be held at our principal executive offices, located at 140 Caspian Court, Sunnyvale, California 94089. |
Q: | Can I attend the Annual Meeting? |
A: | You are invited to attend the Annual Meeting if you were a stockholder of record or a beneficial owner as of the close of business on April 4, 2017 (the Record Date). If you are a stockholder of record, please bring a form of personal identification to be admitted to the meeting. If your shares are held in the name of your broker, trustee or other nominee, you must obtain a legal proxy issued in your name from the broker, trustee or other nominee that holds your shares, together with a form of personal identification, to be admitted to the meeting. The Annual Meeting will begin promptly at 10:00 a.m. Pacific Time. |
Q: | What proposals will be voted on at the Annual Meeting? |
A: | At the Annual Meeting, stockholders will be asked to vote on: |
| The election of three Class I directors to serve until the 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders or until their successors have been duly elected and qualified; |
| The approval of an amendment to the Infinera Corporation 2016 Equity Incentive Plan (the 2016 Plan) to increase the number of shares authorized for issuance thereunder by 6,400,000 shares; |
1
| The approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of Infineras NEOs, as described in the Proxy Statement; |
| The approval, on an advisory basis, of the frequency of stockholder advisory votes on the compensation of Infineras NEOs; and |
| The ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as Infineras independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 30, 2017. |
We are not currently aware of any other business to be acted upon at the Annual Meeting. If any other matters are properly submitted for consideration at the Annual Meeting, including any proposal to adjourn the Annual Meeting, the persons named as proxies will vote the shares represented thereby at their discretion. Adjournments of the Annual Meeting may be made for the purpose of, among other things, soliciting additional proxies. Any adjournment may be made from time to time by approval of the holders of common stock representing a majority of the votes present in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting, whether or not a quorum exists, without further notice other than by an announcement at the Annual Meeting.
Q: | What is the voting requirement to approve each of the proposals and how does the Board recommend that I vote? |
A: | Proposal 1Directors are elected by a majority vote, which requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the total votes cast by holders of shares present in person, or represented by proxy, and entitled to vote for each nominee at the Annual Meeting. You may vote FOR, AGAINST or ABSTAIN on this proposal. Abstentions are deemed to be votes cast and have the same effect as a vote AGAINST this proposal. Broker non-votes are not deemed to be votes cast and, therefore, are not included in the tabulation of the voting results on this proposal and will not affect the outcome of the vote. The Board unanimously recommends that you vote your shares FOR the nominees listed in Proposal 1. |
Proposal 2Approval of an amendment to the 2016 Plan requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the total votes cast by holders of shares present in person, or represented by proxy, and entitled to vote on this proposal at the Annual Meeting. You may vote FOR, AGAINST or ABSTAIN on this proposal. Abstentions are deemed to be votes cast and have the same effect as a vote AGAINST this proposal. Broker non-votes are not deemed to be votes cast and, therefore, are not included in the tabulation of the voting results on this proposal and will not affect the outcome of the vote. The Board unanimously recommends that you vote your shares FOR Proposal 2.
Proposal 3Approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of Infineras NEOs requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the total votes cast by holders of shares present in person, or represented by proxy, and entitled to vote on this proposal at the Annual Meeting. You may vote FOR, AGAINST or ABSTAIN on this proposal. Abstentions are deemed to be votes cast and have the same effect as a vote AGAINST this proposal. Broker non-votes are not deemed to be votes cast and, therefore, are not included in the tabulation of the voting results on this proposal and will not affect the outcome of the vote. The Board unanimously recommends that you vote your shares FOR Proposal 3.
Proposal 4Approval, on an advisory basis, of the frequency of stockholder advisory votes on the compensation of Infineras NEOs will be determined by a plurality vote, which means the option that receives the highest number of votes cast by stockholders will be approved. You may vote for 1 YEAR, 2 YEARS or 3 YEARS on this proposal. Abstentions will not affect the outcome of this proposal. Broker non-votes are not deemed to be votes cast and, therefore, are not included in the tabulation of the voting results on this proposal and will not affect the outcome of the vote. The Board unanimously recommends that you vote your shares for 1 YEAR for Proposal 4.
Proposal 5Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as Infineras independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 30, 2017, requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the total votes cast by holders of shares present in person, or represented by proxy, and entitled to vote on this proposal at the Annual Meeting. You may vote FOR, AGAINST or ABSTAIN on this proposal. Abstentions are deemed to be votes cast and have the same effect as a vote AGAINST this proposal. Broker non-votes are not deemed to be votes cast and, therefore, are not included in the tabulation of the voting results on this proposal and will not affect the outcome of the vote. The Board unanimously recommends that you vote your shares FOR Proposal 5.
2
Q: | What is the difference between holding shares as a stockholder of record and as a beneficial owner? |
A: | Stockholders of RecordIf your shares are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, Computershare, Inc., you are the stockholder of record with respect to those shares, and the Notice has been sent directly to you. |
Beneficial OwnersMany stockholders hold their shares through a broker, trustee or other nominee, rather than directly in their own name. If your shares are held in a brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee, you are considered the beneficial owner of shares held in street name. The Notice has been forwarded to you by your broker, trustee or other nominee who is considered, with respect to those shares, the stockholder of record. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker, trustee or other nominee on how to vote your shares. For directions on how to vote shares beneficially held in street name, refer to the voting instruction card provided by your broker, trustee or other nominee. Because a beneficial owner is not the stockholder of record, you may not vote these shares in person at the Annual Meeting unless you obtain a legal proxy issued in your name from the broker, trustee or other nominee that holds your shares, giving you the right to vote the shares at the Annual Meeting.
Q: | Who is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting? |
A: | Stockholders of record of our common stock at the close of business on the Record Date are entitled to receive notice of and to vote their shares at the Annual Meeting. Such stockholders are entitled to cast one vote for each share of common stock held as of the Record Date. As of the close of business on the Record Date, there were 146,514,815 shares of common stock outstanding and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. Shares held as of the Record Date include shares that are held directly in your name as the stockholder of record and those shares held for you as a beneficial owner through a broker, bank or other nominee. |
Q: | How many shares must be present or represented to conduct business at the Annual Meeting? |
A: | The presence of the holders of a majority of the shares of our common stock entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting is necessary to constitute a quorum at the Annual Meeting. Such stockholders are counted as present at the meeting if they (1) are present in person at the Annual Meeting or (2) have properly submitted a proxy. |
Under the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, as amended, abstentions and broker non-votes are counted as present and entitled to vote and are included for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present at the Annual Meeting.
Q: | What is a broker non-vote and how are they counted at the Annual Meeting? |
A: | A broker non-vote occurs when the broker holding shares for a beneficial owner does not vote on a particular proposal because the broker does not exercise available discretionary voting power with respect to that proposal or, in the absence of discretionary voting power, has not received instructions from the beneficial owner on how to vote the shares. Broker non-votes will be counted towards the presence of a quorum, but will not be counted towards the vote total for any proposal. |
Q: | Which proposals are considered routine or non-routine? |
A: | The election of directors (Proposal 1), the amendment to the 2016 Plan (Proposal 2), the non-binding advisory vote on Infineras NEO compensation (Proposal 3) and the non-binding advisory vote on the frequency of stockholder votes on Infineras NEO compensation (Proposal 4) are non-routine matters for which discretionary voting power does not exist under applicable rules. A broker, trustee or other nominee cannot vote without instructions on non-routine matters, and therefore, broker non-votes may exist in connection with Proposals 1 through 4. Thus, if you hold your shares beneficially in street name and you do not instruct your broker, bank or other nominee how to vote with respect to Proposals 1 through 4, no votes will be cast on your behalf. |
3
The ratification of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm (Proposal 5) is considered a routine matter for which discretionary voting power exists under applicable rules. A broker, trustee or other nominee may generally vote on routine matters, and therefore no broker non-votes are expected to exist in connection with Proposal 5.
Q: | How can I vote my shares in person at the Annual Meeting? |
A: | Stockholders of RecordShares held in your name as the stockholder of record may be voted in person at the Annual Meeting, even if previously voted by another method. To vote in person, please bring a form of personal identification to be admitted to the meeting. |
Beneficial OwnersShares held beneficially in street name may be voted in person at the Annual Meeting only if you obtain a legal proxy issued in your name from the broker, trustee or other nominee that holds your shares, giving you the right to vote the shares at the Annual Meeting. Otherwise, you will not be permitted to vote at the Annual Meeting.
Even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we recommend that you submit your vote as described in the Notice and below, so that your vote will be counted if you later decide not to attend the Annual Meeting.
Q: | How can I vote my shares without attending the Annual Meeting? |
A: | Whether you hold shares directly as the stockholder of record or beneficially in street name, you may direct how your shares are voted without attending the Annual Meeting. If you are a stockholder of record, you may vote by submitting a proxy (please refer to the voting instructions in the Notice or below). If you hold shares beneficially in street name, you may vote by submitting voting instructions to your broker, trustee or other nominee (please refer to the voting instructions provided to you by your broker, trustee or other nominee). |
InternetStockholders of record with Internet access may submit proxies by following the instructions on the Notice. Most of our stockholders who hold shares beneficially in street name may vote by accessing the website specified in the voting instructions provided by their brokers, trustees or other nominees.
TelephoneDepending on how your shares are held, you may be able to vote by telephone. If this option is available to you, you will receive information explaining this procedure.
MailIf you are a stockholder of record and have not already received one, you may request a proxy card from Infinera, and indicate your vote by completing, signing and dating the card where indicated and returning it in the prepaid envelope that will be included with the proxy card.
Q: | How will my shares be voted if I submit a proxy via the Internet, by telephone or by mail and do not make specific choices? |
A: | If you are a stockholder of record or have obtained a proxy voting form from your broker, trustee or other nominee that holds your shares giving you the right to vote the shares, and you submit a proxy via the Internet, by telephone or by mail and do not make voting selections, the shares represented by that proxy will be voted FOR the nominees listed in Proposal 1, FOR Proposals 2, 3 and 5, and 1 YEAR for Proposal 4. If you are a beneficial owner of shares and your broker, trustee or other nominee does not receive instructions from you about how your shares are to be voted, the shares represented by that proxy will not be voted with respect to Proposals 1 through 4 and will be counted as broker non-votes, and with respect to Proposal 5 will be voted at the discretion of your broker, trustee or other nominee. |
Q: | Can I change or revoke my vote? |
A: | Subject to any rules your broker, trustee or other nominee may have, you may change your proxy instructions at any time before your proxy is voted at the Annual Meeting. |
Stockholders of RecordIf you are a stockholder of record, you may change your vote by (1) filing with our Corporate Secretary, prior to your shares being voted at the Annual Meeting, a written notice of revocation or a duly executed proxy card, in either case dated later than the prior proxy relating to the same shares, or
4
(2) attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person (although attendance at the Annual Meeting will not, by itself, revoke a proxy). Any written notice of revocation or subsequent proxy card must be received by our Corporate Secretary prior to the taking of the vote at the Annual Meeting. Such written notice of revocation or subsequent proxy card should be hand delivered to our Corporate Secretary or should be sent to our principal executive offices, Attn: Corporate Secretary. A stockholder of record who has voted via the Internet or by telephone may also change his or her vote by making a timely and valid Internet or telephone vote at a later time but prior to 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time, on the day prior to the Annual Meeting.
Beneficial OwnersIf you are a beneficial owner of shares held in street name, you may change your vote by (1) submitting new voting instructions by any of the applicable voting methods allowed to your broker, trustee or other nominee, or (2) attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person if you have obtained a proxy voting form from the broker, trustee or other nominee that holds your shares giving you the right to vote the shares.
Q: | Who will bear the cost of soliciting votes for the Annual Meeting? |
A: | We will bear all expenses of soliciting proxies for the Annual Meeting. We may reimburse brokerage firms, custodians, nominees, fiduciaries and other persons representing beneficial owners of common stock for their reasonable expenses in forwarding solicitation materials to such beneficial owners. Directors, officers and employees of Infinera may also solicit proxies in person or by other means of communication. Such directors, officers and employees will not be additionally compensated, but may be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses in connection with such solicitation. We have engaged the services of Morrow Sodali LLC, 470 West Avenue, Stamford, Connecticut 06902, as our proxy solicitor to aid in the solicitation of proxies from certain brokers, bank nominees and other institutional owners. Morrows fees for this service are estimated to be $9,500 plus expenses. |
Q: | Where can I find the voting results of the Annual Meeting? |
A: | We intend to announce preliminary voting results at the Annual Meeting and will publish final results on a Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC. |
Q: | Are votes confidential? Who counts the votes? |
A: | We will continue to hold the votes of all stockholders in confidence from directors, officers and employees except: |
| as necessary to meet applicable legal requirements and to assert or defend claims for or against Infinera; |
| in the case of a contested proxy solicitation; |
| if a stockholder makes a written comment on the proxy card or otherwise communicates his or her vote to management; or |
| to allow the independent inspectors of election to certify the results of the vote. |
A representative from Broadridge will serve as the inspector of election.
Q: | What should I do if I receive more than one Notice or set of proxy materials? |
A: | If you receive more than one Notice or set of proxy materials, your shares are likely registered in more than one name or brokerage account. Please follow the voting instructions on each Notice or voting instruction card that you receive to ensure that all of your shares are voted. |
Q: | Can I access Infineras proxy materials and Annual Report on Form 10-K via the Internet? |
A: | Our proxy materials will be available on our website at www.infinera.com/annual_meeting, and all stockholders of record and beneficial owners will have the ability to vote free of charge online with their control number referred to in the Notice at www.proxyvote.com. Our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year |
5
ended December 31, 2016 (the 2016 Annual Report) is also available on the Internet as indicated in the Notice. In addition, you can access this Proxy Statement and the 2016 Annual Report by going to Infineras website at www.infinera.com/annual_meeting. The 2016 Annual Report is not incorporated into this Proxy Statement and is not considered proxy soliciting material. |
Q: | What information from this proxy statement is incorporated by reference into certain Company SEC filings? |
A: | We have made previous filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act) that incorporate future filings, including this proxy statement, in whole or in part. However, the Compensation Committee Report and the Report of the Audit Committee shall not be incorporated by reference into any such filings. |
Q: | How can I view or request copies of Infineras corporate documents and SEC filings? |
A: | Our website contains our Amended and Restated Bylaws (Bylaws), Corporate Governance Guidelines, Board committee charters, Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, and SEC filings. To view these documents, go to www.infinera.com, click on Investor Relations under the Company heading and then click on Committee Charters & Governance Documents under the Corporate Governance heading. To view our SEC filings and Forms 3, 4 and 5 filed by our directors and executive officers, go to www.infinera.com, click on Investor Relations under the Company heading and then click on SEC Filings under the Financials heading. |
We will promptly deliver free of charge, upon request, a copy of our Corporate Governance Guidelines, Board committee charters or Code of Business Conduct and Ethics to any stockholder requesting a copy. Requests should be directed to Infinera Corporation, c/o Corporate Secretary, 140 Caspian Court, Sunnyvale, California 94089.
We will promptly deliver free of charge, upon request, a copy of the 2016 Annual Report and this Proxy Statement to any stockholder requesting a copy. Requests should be directed to Infinera Corporation, c/o Corporate Secretary, 140 Caspian Court, Sunnyvale, California 94089.
6
PROPOSAL 1ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
The Board currently consists of eight directors and is divided into three classes. Each class of the Board serves a staggered three-year term. Our Class I directors, whose terms expire at the Annual Meeting, are Thomas J. Fallon, Kambiz Y. Hooshmand and Rajal M. Patel.
There are three nominees for election to Class I of the Board this year, Messrs. Fallon, Hooshmand and Patel. The nomination of these directors to stand for election at the Annual Meeting has been recommended by the Nominating and Governance Committee and has been approved by the Board. Each of the nominees for our Class I directors, if elected, will serve for a three-year term expiring at the 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, or until his successor is duly elected and qualified, or until his earlier death, resignation or removal from the Board.
Our Bylaws provide that, in an election of directors where the number of nominees does not exceed the number of directors to be elected, each director nominee must receive a majority of votes cast with respect to that director nominee. Should one of the nominees up for election not receive a majority of votes cast, the Board, after taking into consideration the recommendation of the Nominating and Governance Committee, will determine whether or not to accept the pre-tendered resignation of such nominee. The Board will publicly disclose its decision and its rationale within 90 days of the certification of the election results. The director whose resignation is under consideration shall abstain from participating in any decision regarding that resignation.
We believe the current Board consists of a diverse group of professionals who bring significant leadership and distinct qualities to Infinera. This group provides a diverse range of perspectives and experience to engage each other and management to effectively represent our stockholders.
The Nominating and Governance Committee reviews candidates for service on the Board and recommends nominees for election to fill vacancies on the Board, including nomination for re-election of directors whose terms are due to expire. In discharging its responsibilities to nominate candidates for election to the Board, the Nominating and Governance Committee endeavors to identify, recruit and nominate candidates characterized by wisdom, maturity, sound judgment, excellent business skills and high integrity. The Nominating and Governance Committee seeks to assure that the Board is composed of individuals of diverse backgrounds who have a variety of complementary experience, training and relationships relevant to our business. This diversity of background and experience includes ensuring that the Board includes individuals with experience or skills sufficient to meet the requirements of the various rules and regulations of NASDAQ and the SEC, such as the requirements to have a majority of independent directors and an Audit Committee Financial Expert. In nominating candidates to fill vacancies created by the expiration of the term of a director, the Nominating and Governance Committee determines whether the incumbent director is willing to stand for re-election. The Nominating and Governance Committee evaluates each directors performance to determine suitability for re-election, taking into consideration, among other things, each directors willingness to fully participate and contribute to the Board and its committees, ability to work constructively with the rest of the members of the Board, personal and professional integrity and familiarity with our business, operations and markets.
Each of the nominees to fill positions as Class I directors has consented to serve if elected. However, if any of the persons nominated by the Board subsequently declines to accept election, or is otherwise unavailable for election prior to the Annual Meeting, proxies solicited by the Board will be voted by the proxy holders for the election of any other person or persons as the Board may recommend, at its option, or may decide to further reduce the number of directors that constitute the entire Board.
Information Regarding Nominees and Continuing Directors
Set forth below is information regarding each person nominated for election as a Class I director at the Annual Meeting, as well as for each director continuing service on the Board, including their ages as of the Record Date, the periods during which they have served as a director, certain information as to their principal occupations, directorships they hold in corporations whose shares are publicly registered and qualifications for serving as a member of the Board, including the skills, qualities, attributes and experiences that led the Board to determine it is appropriate to nominate these directors.
7
Nominees for Election as Class I Directors whose terms expire at the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. If re-elected, the Class I Directors terms would expire at the 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
Thomas J. Fallon Director since 2009 Age 55 |
Thomas J. Fallon has served as our CEO since January 2010 and as a member of our Board since July 2009. From January 2010 to June 2013, Mr. Fallon also served as our President. Mr. Fallon served as our Chief Operating Officer from October 2006 to December 2009, and as our Vice President of Engineering and Operations from April 2004 to September 2006. From August 2003 to March 2004, Mr. Fallon served as Vice President, Corporate Quality and Development Operations at Cisco Systems. From March 1991 to August 2003, Mr. Fallon served in a variety of functions at Cisco, including General Manager of the Optical Transport Business Unit and Vice President of Service Provider Manufacturing. Prior to joining Cisco, Mr. Fallon served in various manufacturing roles at Sun Microsystems and Hewlett Packard. Mr. Fallon currently serves on one other public company board, Hercules Capital, Inc., a specialty finance company. Mr. Fallon also serves on the Engineering Advisory Board of the Cockrell School at the University of Texas.
As the CEO of Infinera, Mr. Fallon provides significant institutional knowledge of Infinera and industry knowledge, as well as key insight and advice in the Boards consideration and oversight of corporate strategy and management development. Mr. Fallons leadership skills and executive management experience, along with his operational management experience and technical expertise, enable Mr. Fallon to make significant contributions to the Board. |
Kambiz Y. Hooshmand Director since 2009 Age 55 |
Kambiz Y. Hooshmand has been a member of the Board since December 2009 and has served as Chairman of the Board since October 2010. From March 2005 to May 2009, Mr. Hooshmand served as President and CEO of Applied Micro Circuits Corporation (AMCC), a communications solutions company. From February 2002 to March 2005, Mr. Hooshmand served as Group Vice President and General Manager of Cisco Systems. From March 2000 to February 2002, Mr. Hooshmand served as Vice President and Division General Manager of the DSL Business Unit at Cisco Systems. From June 1997 to February 2000, Mr. Hooshmand served as Cisco Systems Vice President of Engineering. From January 1992 to June 1997, Mr. Hooshmand served as Director of Engineering of StrataCom, Inc., a networking solutions company, which was acquired by Cisco Systems. Mr. Hooshmand served on the board of directors of Power-One, Inc., an energy efficient power solutions company, from October 2009 to July 2013. Power-One was acquired by ABB Ltd., a power and automation technology company, in July 2013.
As the Chairman of the Board of Infinera, Mr. Hooshmand brings his leadership skills, industry experience and comprehensive knowledge of our business, financial position and operations to the Board deliberations. Mr. Hooshmand brings significant executive management and technical experience in the networking industry as a result of his executive positions at AMCC, Cisco Systems and StrataCom. The Board also benefits from Mr. Hooshmands service as a member of the Audit Committee, Nominating and Governance Committee and Technology and Acquisition Committee. |
8
Rajal M. Patel Director since 2015 Age 48 |
Rajal M. Patel has been a member of the Board since September 2015. Mr. Patel brings more than 20 years of experience in scaling cloud infrastructure and applications for consumer Internet, SaaS and other service providers globally. Since April 2016, Mr. Patel has served as the Vice President, Cloud Platform Engineering at Symantec Corporation. From March 2014 to April 2016, Mr. Patel served as the Head of Cloud Engineering at Pinterest. Prior to Pinterest, Mr. Patel served as Senior Vice President for Technical Operations at Salesforce.com from July 2013 to December 2013. Mr. Patel was Vice President for Cloud Services Engineering at Cisco from April 2010 to July 2013 for the Webex collaboration portfolio, and held various engineering and management roles at Yahoo! Inc. from 2004 to early 2010. Prior to joining Yahoo!, Mr. Patel worked at Exodus Communications, which was shortly thereafter acquired by Cable and Wireless. While at Cable and Wireless, Mr. Patel served as Vice President of Network Services and facilitated the integration of Exodus technology assets into Cable and Wireless. Mr. Patel began his career at Pacific Bell, which is now AT&T, and over a 10-year span was last the GM of the Advanced Technologies Group.
With over 20 years of experience in technology management and engineering over several transformations of infrastructure and networking technologies ranging from traditional service providers to the most modern webscale networks at the advent of consumer internet providers, Mr. Patels leadership and know-how are additive to Infinera as it pursues these markets. The Board also benefits from Mr. Patels service as a member of the Nominating and Governance Committee and Technology and Acquisition Committee. |
Incumbent Class II Directors whose terms expire at the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
Paul J. Milbury Director since 2010 Age 68 |
Paul J. Milbury has been a member of the Board since July 2010. Mr. Milbury served as Vice President of Operations and CFO of Starent Networks, Corp., a provider of mobile network solutions, from January 2007 until its acquisition by Cisco Systems, Inc., a networking and telecommunications company, in December 2009. From December 2009 to July 2010, Mr. Milbury played a key role in integrating Starent Networks into Cisco Systems to create the Mobile Internet Technology Group. From December 2000 to March 2007, Mr. Milbury served as Vice President and CFO of Avid Technology, Inc., a digital media creation, management and distribution solutions company. Mr. Milbury currently serves on the board of directors of Gigamon, Inc., a provider of network traffic visibility solutions, enabling stronger security and superior performance.
As Chairman of the Audit Committee and as an Audit Committee Financial Expert, Mr. Milbury provides the Board with a strong understanding and high level of experience in the areas of finance, accounting and operations. The Board also benefits from Mr. Milburys service as a member of the Compensation Committee, his executive management experience at Starent Networks, Cisco Systems and Avid Technology, and his experience as a director at various public and private companies. |
9
David F. Welch, Ph.D. Director since 2010 Age 56 |
David F. Welch, Ph.D. co-founded Infinera and has served as our President since June 2013 and a member of the Board since October 2010. From May 2004 to June 2013, he served as our Executive Vice President and Chief Strategy Officer. From May 2001 to May 2004, he served as our Chief Development Officer/Chief Technology Officer. From May 2001 to November 2006, he also served as a member of our Board. From February 2001 to April 2001, he served as Chief Technology Officer of the Transmission Division of JDS Uniphase Corporation, an optical component company. From January 1985 to February 2001, he served in various executive roles, including Chief Technology Officer and Vice President of Corporate Development of SDL, an optical component company. Dr. Welch currently serves on the board of directors of AntriaBio, Inc., a biopharmaceutical company. Dr. Welch holds over 130 patents, and has been awarded the Optical Society of Americas (OSA) Adolph Lomb Medal, Joseph Fraunhofer Award, the John Tyndall Award and the IET JJ Thompson Medal for Achievement in Electronics, in recognition of his technical contributions to the optical industry. He is a Fellow of OSA and the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. Dr. Welch holds a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Delaware and a Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from Cornell University.
As co-founder and President of Infinera, Dr. Welch has strong institutional knowledge of Infinera, coupled with a deep technical understanding of the optical networking industry. Dr. Welchs leadership skills, industry experience and comprehensive technical knowledge provide the Board with an important perspective into our product development, marketing and selling strategies. The Board also benefits from Dr. Welchs service as a member of the Technology and Acquisition Committee. |
Incumbent Class III Directors whose terms expire at the 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
John P. Daane Director since 2016 Age 53 |
John P. Daane has been a member of our Board since January 2016. Mr. Daane served as President, CEO, and a board member of Altera Corporation, a semiconductor company, from November 2000 through Alteras acquisition by Intel Corporation in December 2015. Mr. Daane also served as Chairman of Alteras board from May 2003 through December 2015. From June 1985 through November 2000, Mr. Daane worked for LSI Logic Corporation, a semiconductor manufacturer, in a variety of positions starting as an engineering intern and ending as Executive Vice President of the Communication Product Divisions, including the Networking, Wireless, Telecom, Computer and Consumer Divisions, and central engineering. Mr. Daane also served as a board member of the Semiconductor Industry Association from January 2003 through December 2015. Mr. Daane holds a B.A. in Artificial Intelligence from the University of California at Berkeley.
Mr. Daane brings extensive executive leadership experience in the technology industry, including as the former CEO of Altera. His service as a former CEO of a large public company combined with his technology expertise allows him to provide significant contributions to the Board. The Board also benefits from Mr. Daanes service as Chairman of the Nominating and Governance Committee and as a member of the Compensation Committee. |
10
Marcel Gani Director since 2014 Age 64 |
Marcel Gani has been a member of our Board since June 2014. Mr. Gani has been an independent consultant since 2009. His previous experience includes Lecturer in Accounting and Finance at the Leavey School of Business at Santa Clara University, and multiple roles at Juniper Networks, Inc., including Chief of Staff from January 2005 to March 2006 and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (CFO) from February 1997 to December 2004. Prior to Juniper, Mr. Gani served as Vice President and CFO of NVIDIA Corporation from February 1996 to February 1997. Mr. Gani also served as CFO of Grand Junction Networks, Primary Access Corporation and NeXT Computer, Inc. Mr. Gani currently serves on the board of directors of SolarEdge Technologies, Inc., a power optimizer solutions company. Mr. Gani previously served on the board of directors of Envivio, Inc., a video technology company, from May 2011 through October 2015.
Mr. Ganis executive management experience as a former CFO for various public and private companies in the technology industry provides the Board with broad experience in finance, including accounting and financial reporting. In addition, the Board also benefits from Mr. Ganis service as Chairman of the Compensation Committee and as a member of the Audit Committee, as well as being an Audit Committee Financial Expert. |
Mark A. Wegleitner Director since 2011 Age 66 |
Mark A. Wegleitner has been a member of the Board since May 2011. Since April 2011, Mr. Wegleitner has served as President of Wegleitner Consulting, LLC, a privately owned telecommunications consulting company. From September 2007 until his retirement in July 2010, Mr. Wegleitner served as the Senior Vice President, Technology, for Verizon Communications Inc., a telecommunications company, where his responsibilities included technology assessment, network architecture, platform development and laboratory testing for wireline and wireless communications networks. From July 2000 to September 2007, he served as Chief Technology Officer (CTO) for Verizon, with responsibility for wireline communications technologies. Prior to the creation of Verizon, Mr. Wegleitner held various positions in the Network Services division of Bell Atlantic, a telecommunications company, including CTO from January 1999 to July 2000. Prior to joining Bell Atlantic, he worked at Bell Laboratories and AT&T General Departments.
Mr. Wegleitners extensive experience in the telecommunications industry provides the Board with a high level of expertise and experience. The Board also benefits from Mr. Wegleitners service as Chairman of the Technology and Acquisition Committee and as a member of the Nominating and Governance Committee. |
Vote Required
Directors are elected by a majority vote, which means that each of the three director nominees requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast in order to be elected. Abstentions will have the same effect as an AGAINST vote. Broker non-votes are not deemed to be votes cast and, therefore, are not included in the tabulation of the voting results on this proposal and will not affect the outcome of the vote.
Proposal 1Recommendation of the Board
The Board unanimously recommends a vote FOR the election of each of the three Class I nominees listed above.
11
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
We have adopted a number of policies and practices, some of which are described below, that highlight our commitment to sound corporate governance principles. We also maintain a Corporate Governance section on the Investor Relations page on our website, which can be found at www.infinera.com.
In accordance with the current listing standards of NASDAQ, the Board, on an annual basis, affirmatively determines the independence of each director or nominee for election as a director. The Board has determined that, with the exception of Mr. Fallon and Dr. Welch, both of whom are employees of Infinera, all of its members are independent directors, using the definition of that term in the listing standards of NASDAQ. Also, all members of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Governance Committee, as more fully described below, are independent directors.
Stockholder Communications with the Board
Stockholders may communicate with the Board by writing to the following address:
Board of Directors
c/o Corporate Secretary
Infinera Corporation
140 Caspian Court
Sunnyvale, California 94089
Communications are distributed to the Board or to any individual director, as appropriate, depending on the facts and circumstances outlined in the communication. At the direction of the Board, all mail received may be opened and screened for security purposes. Communications that are unduly hostile, threatening, illegal or similarly unsuitable will be excluded with the provision that any communication that is filtered out will be made available to any independent or non-employee director upon request.
In January 2010, we separated the positions of Chairman of the Board and CEO. Separating these positions allows our CEO to focus on our day-to-day business, while allowing the Chairman of the Board to lead the Board in its fundamental role of providing advice to and independent oversight of management. While our Bylaws do not require that our Chairman of the Board and CEO positions be separate, the Board believes that having separate positions is the appropriate leadership structure for Infinera at this time and demonstrates our commitment to good corporate governance practices. The Board has assigned the Chairman of the Board responsibility for presiding over meetings of the Board, developing meeting agendas, facilitating communication between management and the Board, representing director views to management and improving meeting effectiveness, among other things. Mr. Hooshmand has served as Chairman of the Board since October 2010.
The Board believes that its leadership structure is appropriate. The Board also believes that the combination of an independent chairman, three of our four committees comprised entirely of independent directors and the regular use of executive sessions of the independent directors enables the Board to maintain independent oversight of our strategies and activities.
Risk is inherent with every business and the Board is responsible for overseeing our risk management function. Members of our senior management team are responsible for implementation of our day-to-day risk management processes, while the Board, as a whole and through its committees, has responsibility for the oversight of overall risk management. In addition, each of the committees of the Board considers any risks that may be within its area of responsibilities and Board members, or Board committee members, periodically engage in discussions with members of our senior management team as appropriate. Specifically, the Audit Committee
12
assists the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to risk management in the areas of financial reporting, internal controls and compliance with certain public reporting requirements. The Compensation Committee assists the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to the management of risks arising from our compensation policies and programs. The Nominating and Governance Committee assists the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to the management of risks associated with Board organization, membership and structure, succession planning for our directors and executive officers, and corporate governance. The Technology and Acquisition Committee assists the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to managing the risks associated with technology development and acquisitions and investments. Each of the committee chairs reports to the full Board at regular meetings concerning the activities of the committee, the significant issues it has discussed and the actions taken by the committee.
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which applies to all of our employees, officers (including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, and principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions) and our directors. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics reflects our policy of dealing with all persons, including our customers, employees, investors and suppliers, with honesty and integrity. All employees are required to complete training on our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. A copy of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is posted on our website at www.infinera.com in the Corporate Governance section on our Investor Relations page. You may also obtain a copy of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics without charge by writing to: Infinera Corporation, c/o Corporate Secretary, 140 Caspian Court, Sunnyvale, California 94089. We intend to disclose future amendments to certain provisions of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, or waivers of such provisions, applicable to any principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions and our directors on our website identified above or on a Form 8-K if required by the applicable listing standards.
Corporate Governance Guidelines
The Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines which govern, among other things, board composition, board responsibilities, committee composition, management succession and stockholder communications. You can access these Corporate Governance Guidelines, along with other materials such as Board committee charters, on our website at www.infinera.com in the Corporate Governance section on our Investor Relations page.
The Board believes that it is important to link the interests of our directors and management to those of our stockholders. Accordingly, the Board has adopted a Stock Ownership Policy for our directors and executive officers who are designated as reporting officers under Section 16 of the Exchange Act (Section 16 Officers). For additional information regarding our Stock Ownership Policy, please see the section entitled Compensation Discussion and AnalysisAdditional Information Regarding Our Compensation PracticesStock Ownership Policy.
Information Regarding the Board and its Committees
The Board met seven times during fiscal 2016. The Board acted by written consent three times during fiscal 2016. During fiscal 2016, each director then in office attended 75% or more of the meetings of the Board and the committees on which he served during the period for which he was a director, committee chairman or committee member, as applicable. Our independent directors meet in executive sessions, without management present, during most regular meetings of the Board. Directors are encouraged, but not required, to attend our annual meetings of stockholders. Five members of the Board attended our 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
13
The Board has four standing committees: an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee, a Nominating and Governance Committee, and a Technology and Acquisition Committee. Mr. Fallon does not serve on any committees of the Board. The following table provides membership and meeting information for the Board and each of the committees of the Board as of the end of fiscal 2016:
Name |
Board | Audit | Compensation | Nominating and Governance |
Technology and Acquisition |
|||||||||||||||
John P. Daane(1) |
M | | M | C | | |||||||||||||||
Thomas J. Fallon |
M | | | | | |||||||||||||||
Marcel Gani |
M | M | C | | | |||||||||||||||
Kambiz Y. Hooshmand |
C | M | | M | M | |||||||||||||||
Paul J. Milbury |
M | C | M | | | |||||||||||||||
Rajal M. Patel |
M | | | M | M | |||||||||||||||
Mark A. Wegleitner |
M | | | M | C | |||||||||||||||
David F. Welch, Ph.D. |
M | | | | M | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total Meetings in Fiscal 2016 |
7 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
C = Chairman; M = Member
(1) | Mr. Daane was appointed to the Board effective January 14, 2016. |
Below is a description of each standing committee of the Board as well as the current composition of each committee.
Audit Committee
The Audit Committee reviews and monitors our financial statements, financial reporting process and our external audits, including, among other things, our internal controls and audit functions, the results and scope of the annual audit and other services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm as well as our compliance with legal matters that have a significant impact on our financial statements. The Audit Committee also consults with our management and our independent registered public accounting firm prior to the presentation of financial statements to stockholders and, as appropriate, initiates inquiries into aspects of our financial affairs. The Audit Committee is responsible for establishing procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters, and for the confidential, anonymous submission by our employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters. In addition, the Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, retention, compensation and oversight of the work of our independent registered public accounting firm, including approving services and fee arrangements. Any related party transactions are subject to approval by the Audit Committee. A more detailed description of the Audit Committees functions can be found in our Audit Committee charter. In addition, the Audit Committee meets in executive sessions, without management present and with the independent registered public accounting firm, during most regular meetings of the Audit Committee. A copy of the Audit Committee charter is available on our website at www.infinera.com in the Corporate Governance section on our Investor Relations page.
The current members of the Audit Committee are Messrs. Gani, Hooshmand and Milbury. Mr. Milbury chairs the Audit Committee. Each current member of the Audit Committee served the entire fiscal year. The Audit Committee met eight times during fiscal 2016. The Audit Committee did not act by written consent during fiscal 2016. Each member of the Audit Committee is independent for Audit Committee purposes under the rules and regulations of the SEC and the listing standards of NASDAQ. In addition to qualifying as independent under the NASDAQ rules, each member of the Audit Committee can read and understand fundamental financial statements in accordance with NASDAQ Audit Committee requirements. The Board has determined that Messrs. Gani and Milbury are each an Audit Committee Financial Expert as defined in Item 407(d)(5)(ii) of Regulation S-K. The designation does not impose on Messrs. Gani and Milbury any duties, obligations or liabilities that are greater than are generally imposed on them as members of the Audit Committee and the Board.
Compensation Committee
The Compensation Committee has the responsibility, authority and oversight relating to the development of our overall compensation strategy and compensation policies and programs. The Compensation Committee establishes our compensation philosophy and policies, administers all of our compensation plans for executive
14
officers, and recommends the compensation for the non-employee directors of the Board. The Compensation Committee seeks to assure that our compensation policies and practices promote stockholder interests and support our compensation objectives and philosophy as described in more detail in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement.
The Compensation Committee also oversees, reviews and administers all of our material employee benefit plans, including our 401(k) plan, and reviews and approves various other compensation policies and matters. The Compensation Committee may form and delegate authority to one or more subcommittees as appropriate. A more detailed description of the Compensation Committees functions can be found in our Compensation Committee charter. A copy of the Compensation Committee charter is available on our website at www.infinera.com in the Corporate Governance section on our Investor Relations page.
The current members of the Compensation Committee are Messrs. Daane, Gani and Milbury. Mr. Gani chairs the Compensation Committee. Messrs. Daane and Gani were appointed to the Compensation Committee on February 24, 2016. The Compensation Committee met six times during fiscal 2016. The Compensation Committee acted by written consent twice during fiscal 2016. Each member of the Compensation Committee is a non-employee director, as defined in Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act, an outside director, as defined pursuant to Section 162(m) (Section 162(m)) of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended (the Code) and satisfies the director and compensation committee independence requirements under the listing standards of NASDAQ.
Non-Executive Equity Award Subcommittee
The guidelines for the size of new hire, promotional and annual retention equity awards for Section 16 Officers are reviewed and approved by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee has delegated to the Non-Executive Equity Award Subcommittee (the Subcommittee), consisting of the CEO, General Counsel and Senior Vice President of Human Resources, the authority to formally approve new hire, promotional and annual retention equity awards to certain employees pursuant to guidelines pre-approved by the Compensation Committee. The delegation to the Subcommittee does not include the authority to grant equity awards to new employees who are or are reasonably expected to become Section 16 Officers or to current Section 16 Officers. The delegation of authority to the Subcommittee is not exclusive and the Board and Compensation Committee have retained the right to approve any equity awards at their discretion. The Subcommittee acted by written consent 14 times during fiscal 2016.
Nominating and Governance Committee
The Nominating and Governance Committee reviews and recommends changes to corporate governance policies and practices applicable to Infinera. In addition, the Nominating and Governance Committee is responsible for identifying, evaluating and making recommendations of nominees to the Board and evaluating the performance of the Board and individual directors, including those eligible for re-election at the annual meeting of stockholders. The Nominating and Governance Committee also oversees an annual board evaluation process to determine whether the Board is functioning effectively. The Nominating and Governance Committee is also responsible for reviewing developments in corporate governance practices, and evaluating and making recommendations to the Board concerning corporate governance matters. In addition, the Nominating and Governance Committee oversees our succession planning process. A more detailed description of the Nominating and Governance Committees functions can be found in our Nominating and Governance Committee charter. A copy of the Nominating and Governance Committee charter is available on our website at www.infinera.com in the Corporate Governance section on our Investor Relations page.
The current members of the Nominating and Governance Committee are Messrs. Daane, Hooshmand, Patel and Wegleitner. Mr. Daane chairs the Nominating and Governance Committee. Messrs. Patel and Wegleitner were appointed to the Nominating and Governance Committee on February 24, 2016, and Mr. Daane was appointed on June 20, 2016. The Nominating and Governance Committee met six times during fiscal 2016. The Nominating and Governance Committee did not act by written consent during fiscal 2016. Each member of the Nominating and Governance Committee satisfies the independence requirements under the listing standards of NASDAQ.
15
Board Nominees and Diversity
The Nominating and Governance Committee reviews and reports to the Board on a periodic basis with regard to matters of corporate governance, and reviews, assesses and makes recommendations on the effectiveness of our corporate governance policies. In addition, the Nominating and Governance Committee reviews and makes recommendations to the Board regarding the size and composition of the Board and the appropriate skills and characteristics required of our directors in the context of the then-current composition of the Board. This includes an assessment of each candidates independence, personal and professional integrity, financial literacy or other professional or business experience relevant to an understanding of our business, ability to think and act independently and with sound judgment, and ability to serve our stockholders long-term interests. While we do not have a formal written policy on director diversity, the Board and the Nominating and Governance Committee consider diversity when reviewing the overall composition of the Board and considering the slate of nominees for annual election to the Board and the appointment of individual directors to the Board. Diversity, in this context, includes factors such as experience, specialized expertise, geographic location, cultural background, gender and ethnicity. These factors, and others considered useful by the Nominating and Governance Committee, are reviewed in the context of an assessment of the perceived needs of the Board at a particular point in time. As a result, the priorities and emphasis of the Nominating and Governance Committee and of the Board may change from time to time to take into account changes in business and other trends, as well as the portfolio of skills and experience of current and prospective directors.
The Nominating and Governance Committee leads the search for, selects and recommends candidates for election to the Board. Consideration of new director candidates typically involves a series of committee discussions, review of information concerning candidates and interviews with selected candidates. Candidates for nomination to the Board typically have been suggested by other members of the Board or by our executive officers. From time to time, the Nominating and Governance Committee may engage the services of a third-party search firm to identify director candidates. The Nominating and Governance Committee will also consider candidates proposed in writing by stockholders, provided such proposal meets the eligibility requirements for submitting stockholder proposals for inclusion in our next proxy statement and is accompanied by the required information about the candidate specified in Section 2.4 of our Bylaws. Candidates proposed by stockholders are evaluated by the Nominating and Governance Committee using the same criteria as for all other candidates.
If a stockholder wishes to recommend a director candidate for consideration by the Nominating and Governance Committee, pursuant to our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the stockholder must have held at least 1,000 shares of our common stock for at least six months and must notify the Nominating and Governance Committee by writing to our Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices, and must include the following information:
| To the extent reasonably available, information relating to such director candidate that would be required to be disclosed in a proxy statement pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act, in which such individual would be a nominee for election to the Board; |
| The director candidates written consent to (a) if selected, be named in our proxy statement and proxy, and (b) if elected, to serve on the Board; |
| The other information set forth in the applicable sections of Section 2.4 of our Bylaws; and |
| Any other information that such stockholder believes is relevant in considering the director candidate. |
Technology and Acquisition Committee
The Technology and Acquisition Committee reviews with management, makes recommendations to the Board on and, when expressly authorized by the Board, approves acquisitions, investments, joint ventures and other strategic transactions in which we may engage from time to time. The Technology and Acquisition Committee also evaluates the execution, financial results and integration of any such potential transactions. In addition, the Technology and Acquisition Committee provides advice and counsel on matters relating to technology development and innovation, as well as enhancing the Boards understanding to allow for better input and direction regarding our strategy, progress and risks. A more detailed description of the Technology and Acquisition Committees functions can be found in our Technology and Acquisition Committee charter. A copy of the Technology and Acquisition Committee charter is available on our website at www.infinera.com in the Corporate Governance section on our Investor Relations page.
16
The current members of the Technology and Acquisition Committee are Messrs. Hooshmand, Patel and Wegleitner and Dr. Welch. Mr. Wegleitner chairs the Technology and Acquisition Committee. Messrs. Patel and Wegleitner were appointed to the Technology and Acquisition Committee on February 24, 2016. The Technology and Acquisition Committee met six times during fiscal 2016. The Technology and Acquisition Committee did not act by written consent during fiscal 2016.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
During fiscal 2016, Messrs. Daane, Gani, Milbury and Wegleitner (departed as of February 24, 2016) served on the Compensation Committee. None of these individuals was at any time during fiscal 2016, or at any other time, an executive officer or employee of Infinera. No member of the Compensation Committee had any relationship with Infinera during fiscal 2016 requiring disclosure under Item 404 of Regulation S-K under the Exchange Act. None of our executive officers has ever served as a member of the board or compensation committee of any other entity that has or has had one or more executive officers serving as a member of the Board or Compensation Committee.
17
Our compensation program for our non-employee directors is designed to attract and retain highly-qualified, independent directors to represent stockholders on the Board and to act in their best interests. The Compensation Committee, which consists solely of independent directors, has the primary responsibility for reviewing and recommending any changes to our director compensation program, with compensation changes approved or ratified by the full Board. During fiscal 2015, the Compensation Committee engaged an outside advisor to provide relevant market data regarding our director compensation program in order to review the program. The Compensation Committee and Board determined that a mix of cash compensation and equity awards should continue to be used in our compensation program for our non-employee directors. Directors who are also employees of Infinera do not participate in our director compensation program, nor do they receive any additional compensation for their service as directors. The full Board last approved some changes to the director cash compensation program in September 2015 that took effect beginning in fiscal 2016.
During fiscal 2016, our cash compensation program for our non-employee directors was as follows:
Position |
Annual Retainer Fee ($) |
|||
Non-Employee Director |
50,000 | |||
Chairman of the Board |
50,000 | |||
Audit Committee Chair |
30,000 | |||
Audit Committee Member |
12,500 | |||
Compensation Committee Chair |
20,000 | |||
Compensation Committee Member |
10,000 | |||
Nominating and Governance Committee Chair |
11,000 | |||
Nominating and Governance Committee Member |
6,000 | |||
Technology and Acquisition Committee Chair |
10,000 | |||
Technology and Acquisition Committee Member |
5,000 |
We do not pay any meeting fees for the Board or any of the committees of the Board. We pay the retainer fees set forth above in quarterly installments. Retainer fees are paid in arrears. In addition, we have a policy of reimbursing our non-employee directors for reasonable travel, lodging and other expenses incurred in connection with their attendance at Board and committee meetings.
Non-employee directors are eligible to receive equity awards as follows:
| Initial RSU Award. Each individual who commences service as a non-employee director upon his or her election or appointment to the Board at an annual meeting of stockholders will receive a RSU award for a number of shares with an aggregate fair market value as reported on NASDAQ equal to $165,000. The Initial RSU Award vests in annual installments over three years, provided that the non-employee director remains a service provider of Infinera through each applicable vesting date. |
| Annual RSU Award. On the date of each annual meeting of stockholders, each individual who continues to serve as a non-employee director after that annual meeting will be eligible to receive a RSU award for a number of shares with an aggregate fair market value as reported on NASDAQ equal to $165,000. The Annual RSU Award will vest as to 100% of the shares on the earlier of the date of the next annual meeting of stockholders or the one-year anniversary of the date of grant, provided that the non-employee director remains a service provider of Infinera on the applicable vesting date. |
In addition to the Initial RSU Award, any individual who is first elected or appointed as a non-employee director other than at an annual meeting of stockholders and at least six months prior to the next annual meeting of stockholders will also be eligible for a RSU award for a number of shares with an aggregate fair market value as reported on NASDAQ equal to $165,000 pro-rated for the number of months remaining until the next scheduled annual meeting of stockholders.
18
For the Annual RSU Award in connection with the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, we granted RSU awards in the amount of 13,242 shares of Infinera common stock to each non-employee director then in office. These RSU awards vest in full on May 12, 2017, subject to each non-employee directors continued service to Infinera on the applicable vesting date.
Fiscal 2016 Director Compensation
The following table sets forth all of the compensation awarded to or earned by the non-employee members of the Board in fiscal 2016.
Name |
Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)(1) |
Stock Awards ($)(2) |
Option Awards ($) |
Total ($) |
||||||||||||
John P. Daane |
60,981 | 329,190 | | 390,171 | ||||||||||||
Marcel Gani |
80,231 | 164,201 | | 244,432 | ||||||||||||
Kambiz Y. Hooshmand |
124,310 | 164,201 | | 288,511 | ||||||||||||
Paul J. Milbury |
90,000 | 164,201 | | 254,201 | ||||||||||||
Rajal M. Patel |
59,217 | 164,201 | | 223,418 | ||||||||||||
Mark A. Wegleitner |
69,574 | 164,201 | | 233,775 |
(1) | For a description of the annual non-employee director retainer fees and retainer fees for chair positions and for service as Chairman of the Board, see the disclosure above under Director Fees. |
(2) | The amounts reported in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair value of the RSU awards granted in fiscal 2016 computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, CompensationStock Compensation (ASC 718) and without any adjustment for estimated forfeitures. These amounts reflect our accounting expense for these awards and do not correspond to the actual value that will be recognized by the non-employee directors with respect to these awards at the time the shares of Infinera common stock underlying the RSU awards are vested and/or sold. There can be no assurance that the actual value realized by a non-employee director will be at or near the grant date fair value of the RSU awards granted. |
Additional Information with Respect to Director Equity Awards
Name |
Shares Subject to Stock Awards Outstanding at Fiscal Year-End (#)(1) |
Shares Subject to Option Awards Outstanding at Fiscal Year-End (#) |
||||||
John P. Daane |
23,771 | | ||||||
Marcel Gani |
19,168 | | ||||||
Kambiz Y. Hooshmand |
13,242 | | ||||||
Paul J. Milbury |
13,242 | 7,600 | ||||||
Rajal M. Patel |
18,487 | | ||||||
Mark A. Wegleitner |
13,242 | 40,000 |
(1) | Includes unvested RSU awards. |
19
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth certain information known to us regarding beneficial ownership of our common stock as of the Record Date by:
| Each person known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of any class of our voting securities; |
| Our NEOs; |
| Each of our directors; and |
| All current NEOs and directors as a group. |
The information provided in this table is based on our records, information filed with the SEC and information provided to Infinera, except where otherwise noted. To our knowledge and unless as otherwise indicated, each stockholder possesses sole voting and investment power over the shares listed, except for shares owned jointly with such persons spouse. Percentage beneficially owned is based on 146,514,815 shares of common stock outstanding on the Record Date. Unless otherwise indicated, the principal address of each of the stockholders below is c/o Infinera Corporation, 140 Caspian Court, Sunnyvale, California 94089.
Name of Beneficial Owner |
Common Shares Currently Held |
Common Shares That May Be Acquired Within 60 Days of the Record Date(1) |
Total Beneficial Ownership |
Percent Beneficially Owned |
||||||||||||
5% or More Stockholders |
||||||||||||||||
FMR LLC(2) |
21,644,134 | | 21,644,134 | 14.8 | % | |||||||||||
The Vanguard Group(3) |
10,916,753 | | 10,916,753 | 7.5 | % | |||||||||||
BlackRock, Inc.(4) |
9,228,833 | | 9,228,833 | 6.3 | % | |||||||||||
Named Executive Officers and Directors |
||||||||||||||||
Thomas J. Fallon(5) |
1,132,619 | 425,787 | 1,558,406 | 1.1 | % | |||||||||||
Brad D. Feller |
139,107 | 35,088 | 174,195 | * | ||||||||||||
David F. Welch, Ph.D.(6) |
1,613,051 | 693,667 | 2,306,718 | 1.6 | % | |||||||||||
Robert J. Jandro |
83,097 | 27,366 | 110,463 | * | ||||||||||||
James L. Laufman |
26,286 | 7,305 | 33,591 | * | ||||||||||||
John P. Daane |
15,510 | 13,242 | 28,752 | * | ||||||||||||
Marcel Gani |
87,547 | 13,242 | 100,789 | * | ||||||||||||
Kambiz Y. Hooshmand(7) |
75,489 | 13,242 | 88,731 | * | ||||||||||||
Paul J. Milbury |
25,255 | 20,842 | 46,097 | * | ||||||||||||
Rajal M. Patel |
7,868 | 13,242 | 21,110 | * | ||||||||||||
Mark A. Wegleitner |
38,389 | 53,242 | 91,631 | * | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
All Current Executive Officers and Directors as a Group (11 Persons) |
3,244,218 | 1,316,265 | 4,560,483 | 3.1 | % |
* | Less than 1% of the outstanding shares of common stock. |
(1) | Includes shares represented by vested, unexercised stock options as of the Record Date and stock options, RSUs or other rights that are expected to vest within 60 days of the Record Date. These shares are deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of the person holding the stock options or RSUs, but are not treated as outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. |
(2) | Information based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 14, 2017 by FMR LLC (FMR), Abigail P. Johnson (FMRs Director, Vice Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President) and Fidelity Growth Company Fund (Fidelity). Such amendment states that FMR is deemed to be the beneficial owner of 21,644,134 shares by virtue of its control over Fidelity, which is deemed to be the beneficial owner of 11,952,328 shares as a result of its acting as investment advisor to various investment companies registered under Section 8 of the Investment Company Act of 1940. Such amendment further states that (a) FMR has sole voting power over 5,779,675 shares, shared voting power over no shares, sole dispositive power over 21,644,134 shares, and shared dispositive power over no shares; (b) Ms. Johnson has neither sole nor shared voting power over any shares, sole dispositive power over 21,644,134 shares, and shared dispositive power over no shares |
20
and (c) Fidelity has sole voting power over 11,952,328 shares, shared voting power over no shares, sole dispositive power over no shares, and shared dispositive power over no shares. The address of FMR is 245 Summer Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02210. |
(3) | According to a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 10, 2017 by The Vanguard Group (Vanguard). Vanguard is the beneficial owner of 10,916,753 shares and has sole voting power with respect to 245,452 shares, shared voting power with respect to 14,446 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 10,663,809 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 252,944 shares. The address of Vanguard is 100 Vanguard Boulevard, Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355. |
(4) | According to a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on January 25, 2017 by BlackRock, Inc. (BlackRock). BlackRock is the beneficial owner of 9,228,833 shares and has sole voting power with respect to 8,945,002 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 9,228,833 shares. The address of BlackRock is 55 East 52nd Street, New York, New York 10055. |
(5) | Shares held by The Fallon Family Revocable Trust dated 9/7/94. |
(6) | Consists of (i) 620,408 shares held by The Welch Family Trust dated 4/3/96; (ii) 307,593 shares held by LRFA, LLC, a limited liability company of which Dr. Welch is the sole managing member; (iii) 140,000 shares held by The Welch Group, L.P., a limited partnership of which Dr. Welch is the general partner; (iv) 542,550 shares held by SEI Private Trust Company, Trustee of The Welch Family Heritage Trust I u/l dated 9/24/01; and (v) 2,500 shares held by Dr. Welch as trustee for his children. Dr. Welch disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares held in trust for his children. |
(7) | Consists of (i) 35,234 shares held by Mr. Hooshmand; and (ii) 40,255 shares held by 2002 Hooshmand Family Trust UA 03/01/2002. |
21
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis provides information related to the fiscal 2016 compensation program and related decisions for our NEOs identified below. For fiscal 2016, these individuals were:
| Thomas J. Fallon, our CEO; |
| Brad D. Feller, our CFO; |
| David F. Welch, Ph.D., our President; |
| Robert J. Jandro, our Senior Vice President, Worldwide Sales; and |
| James L. Laufman, our Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary. |
Our executive compensation program is designed to balance near-term results with long-term success and to encourage our executive officers to continue to build value through innovation and execution. To fulfill this mission, we have a pay-for-performance compensation philosophy that forms the foundation for all decisions regarding executive compensation made by the Compensation Committee of the Board. In addition, we are committed to equity-based pay practices, which help ensure alignment of our executive officers interests with the interests of our stockholders.
Fiscal 2016 Business Summary
After three years of solid revenue growth in which our total revenue grew from $544.1 million at the end of fiscal 2013 to $886.7 million by the end of fiscal 2015, total revenue of $870.1 million in fiscal 2016 was 2% lower than fiscal 2015 revenue. Technology and product transitions impacted the short-term competitiveness of our products, negatively impacting revenue. In addition, revenue was negatively impacted by the consolidation of some of our major customers and changes in their buying patterns, including shifting spend away from long-haul to other parts of their networks. Gross margin decreased to 45.2% in fiscal 2016 from 45.5% in fiscal 2015. In the second half of fiscal 2016, we experienced downward pressure on gross margin levels primarily attributable to making investments to secure future business with existing and prospective customers across our end markets.
Despite our challenges in the second half of fiscal 2016, we continued to diversify our customer base by delivering an end-to-end portfolio of packet-optical solutions for the long-haul, subsea, datacenter interconnect (DCI) and metro markets. As we continued to expand the markets we address in fiscal 2016, we continued to generate a majority of our revenue from the long-haul market, despite the downturn we experienced in long-haul revenue during the second half of fiscal 2016. The general slowdown in the long-haul market was exacerbated by significant consolidation among our largest customers. In addition, we faced a technology shortfall around spectral efficiencies, which limited our ability to win substantial business in the subsea market. In DCI, we made solid progress with our Cloud Xpress platform as we expanded business with existing customers and also won new customers in this market. During fiscal 2016, we also made solid progress in broadening the deployments of our metro solutions both with existing and new customers. Of note in fiscal 2016:
| Revenue was $870.1 million in fiscal 2016, compared to $886.7 million in fiscal 2015 and $668.1 million in fiscal 2014. |
| GAAP gross margin in fiscal 2016 was 45.2%, compared to 45.5% in fiscal 2015 and 43.2% in fiscal 2014. Non-GAAP gross margin(1) was 48.3% in fiscal 2016, compared to 47.8% in fiscal 2015 and 44.0% in fiscal 2014. |
| GAAP operating loss was $(25.8) million in fiscal 2016, compared to operating income of $59.7 million in fiscal 2015 and operating income of $27.3 million in fiscal 2014. Non-GAAP operating income(1) was $54.4 million in fiscal 2016, compared to $116.5 million in fiscal 2015 and $55.7 million in fiscal 2014. |
(1) | For a reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP gross profit, gross margin and operating income (loss) for fiscal 2016, 2015 and 2014, please see Appendix A to this Proxy Statement. |
22
| GAAP net loss in fiscal 2016 was $(23.9) million, or $(0.17) per share, compared to net income of $51.4 million, or $0.36 per diluted share, in fiscal 2015, and net income of $13.7 million, or $0.11 per diluted share, in fiscal 2014. |
The following tables illustrate our revenue and non-GAAP operating income over the last three fiscal years (in millions):
(1) | For a reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP gross profit, gross margin and operating income (loss) for fiscal 2016, 2015 and 2014, please see Appendix A to this Proxy Statement. |
The following graph shows our 1-, 3- and 5-year TSR as compared to the S&P Networking Index.
Fiscal 2016 Executive Compensation Program Design Highlights
The design of our executive compensation program for fiscal 2016 promoted the continued strong alignment of the interests of our executive officers with those of our stockholders. Highlights of our executive compensation program for fiscal 2016 included the following:
| The majority of our CEOs fiscal 2016 target total direct compensation was in equity. |
| 69% of our CEOs target total direct compensation (the sum of base salary, target cash incentive opportunity and target equity incentive compensation at grant date fair value) was in the form of equity awards, which links our CEOs compensation directly to the value of our common stock. In fiscal 2016, our CEO received a PSU award (also the 2016 TSR Award) for 135,990 shares of our common stock (at target attainment) and a time-based RSU award for 86,850 shares of our common stock. |
23
| The majority of our CEOs fiscal 2016 target total direct compensation and target equity compensation were at risk. |
| 58% of our CEOs target total direct compensation was fully at risk. This significant portion of his compensation was based on our performance against measurable performance objectives set forth under the 2016 Bonus Plan and PSU award. |
| 60% of our CEOs target equity compensation was in the form of a PSU award. The 2016 TSR Award could be earned based on our relative TSR performance measured over three performance periods against the S&P Networking Index. |
| Our fiscal 2016 PSU awards included rigorous performance requirements. The 2016 TSR Award is consistent with prior year awards that measured our stock performance against a networking index. To support our pay-for-performance philosophy and further emphasize the importance of creating long-term stockholder value, the 2016 TSR Award contained several features we consider to be best practices. |
| Sustained performance requirement. To earn the maximum number of shares under the 2016 TSR Award, which is 200% of the target number of shares, our TSR must exceed that of the S&P Networking Index by 50 points or more as calculated on each of the one-, two- and three-year measurement periods (coinciding with the end of our fiscal 2016, 2017 and 2018). |
| Steeper downside risk. The number of shares that may be earned under the 2016 TSR Award is reduced one and one-half times faster if our TSR underperforms the S&P Networking Index (3-to-1 downside) than it is increased if our TSR outperforms the S&P Networking Index (2-to-1 upside). For example, if we underperform the S&P Networking Index by 10 points of TSR, 70% of the target number of shares subject to the award would be earned. If we outperform the S&P Networking Index by 10 points of TSR, 120% of the target number of shares subject to the award would be earned. |
| Payment cap. Regardless of our performance versus the S&P Networking Index, the number of shares that may be earned under the 2016 TSR Award is capped at 100% of target for any period in which our TSR is negative. Therefore, even if we significantly outperform the S&P Networking Index in challenging market conditions, this award only provides rewards above the target performance level if incremental stockholder value is created. |
Fiscal 2016 Executive Compensation Program Payout Highlights
Our fiscal 2016 payouts reflect the alignment of our executive compensation program to the performance of Infinera. As indicated above, a significant portion of our executive compensation program was designed to align the compensation outcomes for our NEOs on performance against measurable objectives.
Bonuses under the 2016 Bonus Plan for NEOs were determined based on our performance against a mix of financial objectives (weighted at 80%) and operational objectives (weighted at 20%). The financial performance objectives for the 2016 Bonus Plan consisted of revenue and non-GAAP operating income, as detailed below. Our fiscal 2016 revenue and non-GAAP operating income results were lower compared to fiscal 2015 and did not meet the minimum threshold established by the Compensation Committee under the 2016 Bonus Plan, resulting in no payout for the financial component (weighted at 80%) of the plan.
Performance Measure |
Fiscal 2015 Actual Results |
Fiscal 2016 Financial Performance | Funding as a % of Target |
|||||||||||||||||
Threshold (50%) |
Target (100%) |
Actual | ||||||||||||||||||
Revenue (in millions) |
$ | 886.7 | $ | 1,000.0 | $ | 1,100.0 | $ | 870.1 | 0 | % | ||||||||||
Non-GAAP Operating Income (in millions) |
$ | 116.5 | >$ | 123.7 | >$ | 153.9 | $ | 54.4 |
For the operational objectives (weighted at 20%) under the 2016 Bonus Plan, the Compensation Committee included (i) three quality-based objectives related to a mix of hardware and software reliability; (ii) two key technology development objectives; and (iii) the expansion of our enterprise resource planning system. For fiscal 2016, we achieved a majority of the operational objectives, resulting in a payout for the operational component of the 2016 Bonus Plan at 82.5%. This resulted in an aggregate bonus payout of 16.5% of target performance based on the weighting between financial and operational objectives.
24
During fiscal 2016, there were portions of four PSU awards for which payout was based entirely or in part on our performance during the year. Three of the awards (the fiscal 2014, 2015 and 2016 PSU awards) measured our TSR against the S&P Networking Index. As summarized in the table below, we failed to outperform the TSR of the S&P Networking Index for any of the applicable periods, which resulted in no payouts for each of the performance periods that concluded at the end of fiscal 2016.
Year of |
Benchmark(1) |
Applicable Measurement Period(2) |
% of Target Award Tied to Period |
Performance Comparison | Payout as a % of Target |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Infinera % Change |
Index % Change |
Infinera Minus Index |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
2016 | S&P Networking Index | ~1-year | 33 | % | -59 | % | 17 | % | -76 points | 0 | % | |||||||||||||||
2015 | S&P Networking Index | ~2-years | 33 | % | -46 | % | 21 | % | -67 points | 0 | % | |||||||||||||||
2014 | S&P Networking Index | ~3-years | 33 | % | -2 | % | 33 | % | -36 points | 0 | % |
(1) | For the fiscal 2014 and 2015 awards, performance was calculated using a 60-day average closing stock price and index value leading up to and including the grant date and at the end of the performance period. For the fiscal 2016 awards, performance was calculated using a 60-day average closing stock price and index value up to and inclusive of December 26, 2015 (the last day of fiscal 2015), and at the end of the performance period. |
(2) | One-third of the target award is tied to the end of the first, second and third fiscal years after the grant date. |
The fourth PSU award eligible to vest in fiscal 2016 was the CX PSU Award granted in fiscal 2015. The target shares subject to the CX PSU Award were tied to the achievement of pre-established minimum revenue thresholds for our then-new Cloud Xpress family of products. For the first measurement period, which measured cumulative revenue performance during fiscal 2015, no shares had been earned. Revenue performance was also measured from the first day of fiscal 2015 through the second quarter of fiscal 2016, which resulted in a payout at 136% of target.
Governance of Executive Compensation
Our executive compensation program includes the following executive compensation governance policies and practices:
| Executive Clawback Policy. We maintain an executive clawback policy that applies to our Section 16 Officers and provides for recovery of incentive compensation under specified circumstances as described below in the section entitled Compensation Discussion and AnalysisAdditional Information Regarding our Compensation PracticesExecutive Clawback Policy. |
| Anti-Hedging Policy. Our Insider Trading Policy prohibits all employees, including our NEOs, from hedging their Infinera common stock. |
| Anti-Pledging Policy. Our Insider Trading Policy prohibits our NEOs from pledging Infinera common stock as collateral for a loan. |
| Fully Independent Compensation Committee. Our executive compensation program is administered annually by the Compensation Committee, which consists solely of independent directors. |
| Stock Ownership Policy. Our Section 16 Officers and the non-employee members of the Board are subject to minimum stock ownership requirements as described below in the section entitled Compensation Discussion and AnalysisAdditional Information Regarding our Compensation PracticesStock Ownership Policy. |
| No Guaranteed Bonuses. We do not provide any guaranteed bonuses for any of our executive officers with the exception of sign on bonuses that may be negotiated as part of an executive officer new hire package. |
| No Tax Gross-Ups. We do not have any arrangements providing for tax gross-ups of any compensation elements with any of our executive officers. |
| Double-trigger Change of Control Arrangements. Our change of control agreements contain double-trigger arrangements that require a termination of employment without cause or a constructive termination of employment following a change of control of Infinera before payments and benefits are triggered. |
25
| Annual Compensation Risk Assessment. The Compensation Committee annually conducts a compensation risk assessment to determine whether our compensation arrangements, or components thereof, create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on Infinera. |
| No Executive Perquisites. Our executive officers are only eligible to receive the same benefits and perquisites as our other U.S. salaried employees. |
| Independent Compensation Consultant Reporting Directly to Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee utilizes input from an independent compensation consultant that is retained directly by the Compensation Committee and performed no services for Infinera during fiscal 2016 other than services for the Compensation Committee. |
Advisory Vote on Fiscal 2015 Named Executive Officer Compensation Say-on-Pay Vote
In calendar 2016, stockholders were provided with the opportunity to cast an advisory (non-binding) vote (a say-on-pay proposal) on the compensation of our NEOs for fiscal 2015. Our stockholders overwhelmingly approved this say-on-pay proposal, with over 98% of votes cast voting in favor of our executive compensation program. Noting the results of this vote, for fiscal 2016, the Compensation Committee retained our general approach to our executive compensation program, with a continued emphasis on rewarding our executive officers through compensation if they deliver value for our stockholders. The Compensation Committee considers input from our stockholders, as well as the outcome of our annual say-on-pay vote, when making executive compensation program decisions.
Overview of our Executive Compensation Program Philosophy and Process
Compensation Objectives and Philosophy
Our executive compensation program is designed to attract, retain, and reward talented executive officers and to motivate them to pursue our corporate objectives, while fostering the creation of long-term value for our stockholders. To achieve this mission, we take a pay-for-performance approach that forms the foundation for the design of our executive compensation program. The Compensation Committee also designs the various components of our executive compensation program to support our company culture (i.e., increasing levels of accountability through the use of at risk pay for more senior employees), the internal company environment relative to industry conditions, current business priorities, strategy and product development cycles, and current market practices of our peer group.
Compensation-Setting Process
Role and Authority of Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee is responsible for our executive compensation program and all related policies and practices. The Compensation Committee has the responsibility to establish and approve the compensation of each of our executive officers, including our NEOs. In addition, the Compensation Committee reviews and administers our equity and employee benefit plans and programs, which are generally available to our employees, including our NEOs. The Compensation Committee also has the authority to engage its own advisors to assist it in carrying out its responsibilities, and the reasonable compensation for such advisor services is paid by Infinera.
Role of Compensation Consultant. During fiscal 2016, the Compensation Committee engaged the services of Compensia, Inc. (Compensia), a national compensation consulting firm. Compensia provided the Compensation Committee with an analysis of industry sector competitive market data regarding NEO compensation, information on compensation trends, peer group and general market data, as well as assistance with the parameters used to determine the peer group, base salary, incentive plan design and the structure of our executive compensation program. During fiscal 2016, Compensia also provided general observations about our compensation programs.
Compensia reports directly to the Compensation Committee. Compensia interacted with management at the direction of the Compensation Committee but did not provide any other services for Infinera or its management team in fiscal 2016. Compensias fees were paid by Infinera. The Compensation Committee annually reviews the independence of its compensation consultant and during fiscal 2016 determined that there were no conflicts of interest in connection with Compensias work.
26
Determination of CEO Compensation. Our compensation consultant provides market data and considerations for the Compensation Committee regarding the amount and form of our CEOs compensation. As part of this process, the Compensation Committee considers input from the Board and feedback from the Chairman of the Board in particular with respect to the performance of our CEO. After considering the feedback and recommendations received, all decisions regarding our CEOs compensation are made by the Compensation Committee, based on its own judgment and the interests of our stockholders, in executive sessions excluding our CEO.
Determination of non-CEO Compensation. As a result of his close working relationship with each of the other NEOs, our CEO is asked to provide his assessment of their performance to the Compensation Committee, including considerations regarding retention and importance to Infinera. Our CEO is assisted by our Senior Vice President of Human Resources in making these assessments. Our CEO then presents his performance assessment of the other NEOs and makes formal recommendations to the Compensation Committee regarding adjustments to base salary, annual cash incentive award opportunities and equity awards for our NEOs (other than himself). While the Compensation Committee considers the recommendations of our CEO in determining compensation for our other NEOs, ultimately its decisions are based on its own judgment and the interests of our stockholders. None of our NEOs makes any recommendations regarding his own compensation and, with the exception of our General Counsel, in his role as secretary of the meeting, none of our NEOs are present at meetings in which their compensation is determined. The Compensation Committee finalized compensation decisions for the CEO and President in executive session without management present.
Executive Compensation Elements
We provide base salaries to attract, retain and motivate our executive officers for their day-to-day contributions, annual incentive cash compensation to link payments to the achievement of our annual financial and/or operational objectives, and long-term incentive compensation delivered in the form of equity awards to align the interests of our executive officers with those of our stockholders and provide significant motivational and retention value to our executive officers. These are the key elements of our executive compensation program. We believe each is necessary to attract, retain and motivate our executive officers, on whom our success largely depends. In addition, we also provide employee benefits that are generally available to all our employees including our NEOs, and certain severance and double-trigger change of control payments and benefits as part of our executive compensation program as described further below.
Allocation of Compensation across Pay Elements
In determining how to allocate an NEOs target total direct compensation opportunity among these various elements, the Compensation Committee seeks to take into account market competitive practices for companies of a similar size and with a comparable business focus. Individual retention considerations specific to the individual are also factored in the Compensation Committees final determination of target total direct compensation. Equity awards, which for fiscal 2016 consisted of a time-based RSU award and a PSU award, represented the largest component of our NEOs target total direct compensation opportunity. This approach was designed to encourage sustained, long-term performance and to ensure alignment of the interests of our NEOs and our stockholders. Consistent with our pay-for-performance philosophy, a significant portion of our NEOs fiscal 2016 target total direct compensation opportunity was completely at risk, including 58% of our CEOs target total direct compensation opportunity. We define at risk compensation as opportunities for which vesting as well as the level of achievement is contingent upon achievement of specified performance conditions. In fiscal 2016, this included the 2016 Bonus Plan and PSU awards.
27
The following charts show the target total direct compensation mix for fiscal 2016 for our CEO and our other NEOs as a group (value of equity awards is determined using grant date fair value):
Competitive Positioning
In making compensation decisions for our executive officers (other than our President), the Compensation Committee reviews and analyzes competitive market practices using data drawn from a group of peer companies and the Radford Global Technology survey. In the case of our President, due to the lack of a representative sample of data specific to this position, the Compensation Committee used an approximation of peer compensation based on data available from these sources.
The Compensation Committee reviews the compensation peer group annually and updates its composition as necessary to take into account changes in both our business and the businesses of the peer group companies. The targeted selection criteria were adjusted to account for our improved revenue over the past several years as well as to account for the acquisition of Transmode AB (Transmode), which would add revenue in fiscal 2016. The fiscal 2016 peer group was based on the following targeted selection criteria:
| Industry: companies in the communications equipment or related industry segments; |
| Annual Revenue: $400 million to $2.5 billion; |
| Market Capitalization: $750 million to $5 billion; and |
| Number of Employees: 660 to 2,635. |
In addition to these criteria, the Compensation Committee considered each potential peer companys revenue growth rates, headcount, primary location and whether the potential peer company included Infinera in its compensation peer group. The Compensation Committee also considered whether a potential peer company was selected as a peer company of Infinera by one of the major proxy advisory firms. Given the limited number of companies directly comparable to us from a business perspective, and the wide range of factors under consideration, not all peer companies satisfy all of the targeted selection criteria. Further, a number of the companies in the fiscal 2015 peer group had been or were in the process of being acquired. The above factors resulted in a greater number of changes year over year as compared to prior years.
The compensation peer group established to assist in determining fiscal 2016 compensation for our NEOs included the following 18 companies:
ACI Worldwide* | IPG Photonics Corporation | |
ADTRAN, Inc. | Mentor Graphics* | |
Brocade Communications* | Microsemi* | |
Ciena Corporation | MicroStrategy* | |
Coherent, Inc. | Plantronics | |
FEI* | QLogic | |
Finisar Corporation | Silicon Laboratories* | |
Integrated Device Technology* | Ubiquiti Networks* | |
InterDigital, Inc. | ViaSat, Inc. |
* | Indicates an addition to the peer group for fiscal 2016. Companies removed from the fiscal 2015 peer group included Aruba Networks, Inc., Calix, Inc., Emulex Corporation, Extreme Networks, Inc., Harmonic, Inc., Ixia, NETGEAR, Inc., Riverbed Technology, Inc., ShoreTel, Inc. and Sonus Networks, Inc. |
28
Given that not all of the peer companies report data for a position comparable to each of our NEOs, the Compensation Committee also reviewed market data derived from the Radford Global Technology survey. In this discussion, where we refer to market levels of pay and the market data, we are referring to the combined compensation peer group and survey data described above that were then in effect and applicable to our NEOs.
Use of Market Data
For its fiscal 2016 compensation decisions, the Compensation Committee maintained a holistic and flexible approach in its use of market data. The Compensation Committees goal is generally to set all elements of compensation within a competitive range, using a balanced approach that does not use rigid percentiles to target pay levels for each compensation element, but instead makes its compensation decisions based on a variety of relevant factors, including those listed below. While the Compensation Committee continues to review and reference market data, the data generally is used to inform the Compensation Committee of market practices to ensure that our executive compensation program remains within a generally competitive range of our peers. In addition to the market data, several other factors are taken into account in setting the amount of each NEOs target total direct compensation opportunity. These factors include:
| Recruitment, retention and historical factors. The Compensation Committee reviews existing NEO compensation and retention levels relative to estimated replacement cost with respect to the scope, responsibilities and skills required of the particular position. |
| Lack of directly comparable data for some of our key roles. Compensation data for some of our key positions (i.e., President) are often not explicitly reported by companies in our compensation peer group or survey data. This results in limited sample sizes and/or inconclusive data that can be misleading if targeting a specific percentile for market positioning. |
| Market positioning may be distorted by the source of the data. Certain elements of compensation reported from one source can be consistently higher or lower than the data collected from another, given differences in methods and samples used by each source to collect market data. Given this variability and volatility within the market data, the Compensation Committee has determined that targeting pay levels at specific percentiles of this data could result in outcomes that do not align with the internal value and strategic importance of various roles at Infinera. |
| Desire to account for other factors not captured in the market data. As discussed below, the Compensation Committee also considers several qualitative factors. |
Relevant Qualitative Factors
In addition to our uses of competitive market data as described above, the Compensation Committee considers a range of subjective and qualitative factors when making compensation decisions for our NEOs, including:
| The role the executive officer plays and the importance of such individual to our ability to execute on our business strategy and to achieve our strategic objectives; |
| Each executive officers tenure, skills and experience; |
| The responsibilities and particular nature of the functions performed or managed by the executive officer; |
| Our CEOs recommendations and his assessment of each executive officers performance (other than his own performance), and with respect to the CEOs performance, assessment by the Board; |
| The value of unvested equity awards held by each executive officer and in comparison to other members of our executive management team and senior employees; |
| The impact of our compensation decisions on key financial and other measures such as our equity award burn rate; |
| Our overall performance as compared to internal plans and external benchmarks; |
| The potential impact on stockholder dilution of our compensation decisions relative to peers and historical practices; |
29
| Internal pay equity across the executive management team; and |
| Competitive labor market pressures and the likely cost, difficulty and impact on our business and strategic objectives that would be encountered in recruiting a replacement for the role filled by each of our NEOs. |
The Compensation Committee does not assign relative weights or rankings to any of these factors and does not solely use any quantitative formula, target percentile or multiple for establishing compensation among the executive officers or in relation to the market data. Instead, the Compensation Committee relies upon its members knowledge and judgment in assessing the various qualitative and quantitative inputs it receives regarding each individual and makes compensation decisions accordingly.
Base Salaries
Base salary is a customary, fixed element of compensation intended to attract and retain executives. For fiscal 2016, the Compensation Committee reviewed the base salaries for each of our NEOs taking into consideration the market data provided by its independent compensation consultant and strong financial performance over the prior fiscal year, and approved an increase for each of our NEOs. Given that our CEOs and Presidents base salaries had historically been below market levels, and after taking into consideration their significant contributions and strong leadership during fiscal 2015 and over the last few years, the Compensation Committee determined that increases in their base salaries were appropriate to maintain competitiveness with market practices and to recognize their performance during the year. The other NEOs were also given increases in recognition of their contributions to Infinera and to maintain competitiveness with market practices.
The following table shows the annual base salary for each of our NEOs for fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2016:
Name |
Fiscal 2015 Annual Base Salary |
Fiscal 2016 Annual Base Salary |
||||||
Thomas J. Fallon |
$ | 540,000 | $ | 650,000 | ||||
Brad D. Feller |
$ | 360,000 | $ | 400,000 | ||||
David F. Welch, Ph.D. |
$ | 450,000 | $ | 500,000 | ||||
Robert J. Jandro |
$ | 350,000 | $ | 365,000 | ||||
James L. Laufman |
$ | 325,000 | $ | 365,000 |
Performance-Based Incentive Cash Compensation (2016 Bonus Plan)
Target Bonus Opportunities. The Compensation Committee reviewed the target bonus opportunities (which are expressed as a percentage of base salary) for fiscal 2016 for each of our NEOs, and determined that an adjustment was appropriate in order to maintain competitiveness with market practices with respect to Dr. Welch, and in light of his significant contributions to Infinera. The Compensation Committee also increased the percentage for Mr. Feller in order to maintain competitiveness with market practices. The percentages for the other NEOs remained the same as the prior fiscal year. The following table shows the target bonus opportunities for each of our NEOs for fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2016:
Name |
Fiscal 2015 Target Bonus (as a percentage of base salary) |
Fiscal 2016 Target Bonus (as a percentage of base salary) |
||||||
Thomas J. Fallon |
125 | % | 125 | % | ||||
Brad D. Feller |
70 | % | 75 | % | ||||
David F. Welch, Ph.D. |
80 | % | 90 | % | ||||
Robert J. Jandro |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||||
James L. Laufman |
60 | % | 60 | % |
Bonus Plan Design. Bonuses under the 2016 Bonus Plan for NEOs were paid out based on our performance against a mix of financial objectives (weighted at 80%) and operational objectives (weighted at 20%) as discussed below.
30
The 2016 Bonus Plan also contained an individual performance component that could be used to adjust the bonus payouts for our NEOs by factors of 75% to 125% of the funded amount. Our CEO was responsible for reviewing the individual performance of each NEO (other than himself) and recommending a bonus adjustment for each NEO. The Compensation Committee then had sole discretion to determine any individual performance adjustments for each NEO (including the CEO) and the final bonus payout for fiscal 2016.
The financial performance objectives for the 2016 Bonus Plan consisted of revenue and non-GAAP operating income, and were selected to focus our NEOs on important and measurable financial measures, and to more closely align their interests with our stockholders interests. The Compensation Committee believes that revenue growth is an essential component of the long-term success and viability of Infinera. In addition, the Compensation Committee determined that a focus on non-GAAP operating income would serve to make generating a return for stockholders a priority. For purposes of the 2016 Bonus Plan, non-GAAP operating income was calculated excluding non-cash stock-based compensation expenses, amortization and impairment of acquired intangible assets, acquisition-related costs and certain purchasing accounting adjustments related to our acquisition of Transmode, which closed during the third quarter of fiscal 2015. For a reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP operating income for fiscal 2016, please see Appendix A to this Proxy Statement.
For fiscal 2016, the financial performance objectives for revenue and non-GAAP operating income were as follows:
Revenue |
Non-GAAP Operating Income |
Payout as a Percentage of Target | ||
$1,000 million |
$123.67 million | 50% | ||
$1,050 million |
$137.53 million | 75% | ||
$1,100 million |
$153.95 million | 100% | ||
$1,110 million |
$154.10 million | 100% | ||
$1,190 million |
$175.68 million | 138% | ||
$1,250 million |
$191.87 million | 172% | ||
$1,300 million |
$205.36 million | 200% |
| If the level of performance for either of the financial objectives was below the minimum thresholds of $1,000 million for revenue or $123.67 million for non-GAAP operating income, there would be no payout for the financial objectives. |
| For a payout to occur at each of the percentages indicated in the table above, both the revenue and non-GAAP operating income objectives had to be met at the specified levels applicable to that payout percentage. If the revenue and non-GAAP operating income objectives are achieved at levels that are at different payout percentages, then the payout will be governed by whichever objective is achieved at the lower level (and using straight line interpolation if achievement of such objective is between any two levels in the table above). |
| For performance attainment above the maximum level, the payout was capped at 200%. |
The Compensation Committee also believed that focusing on specific operational objectives was important to measuring our success in fiscal 2016. The Compensation Committee approved the following six operational objectives for the 2016 Bonus Plan (with an aggregate weighting of 20% under the 2016 Bonus Plan), which included (i) three quality-based objectives related to a mix of hardware and software reliability; (ii) two key technology development objectives; and (iii) the expansion of our enterprise resource planning system. Payouts tied to the operating objectives were based upon the achievement, as determined by the Compensation Committee, of each operating objective. No payout would be made for any operating objective that was behind schedule or failed to meet quality target measures. Payouts were capped at 100% for the operational objectives.
Operational Objectives |
Weighting | Maximum Attainment |
||||||
Three Quality Goals |
16.6% each (50%) | 100 | % | |||||
Two Development Goals |
17.5% each (35%) | 100 | % | |||||
One Goal Related to ERP Upgrade |
15% | 100 | % |
31
Bonus Plan Results. The following table shows our actual performance with respect to each financial and operational objective under the 2016 Bonus Plan:
Performance Measures |
Actual Performance | |||
Financial Objectives (weighted at 80%) |
||||
Revenue for Fiscal 2016 |
$ | 870.1 Million | ||
Non-GAAP Operating Income for Fiscal 2016 |
$ | 54.4 Million | ||
Operational Objectives (weighted at 20%) |
||||
Quality |
Achieved | |||
Development |
Partially Achieved | (1) | ||
Operations |
Achieved |
(1) | We achieved one of the two development goals during fiscal 2016. For the development goal that was not achieved, the eligible NEOs received no payout for this portion of the bonus. |
Upon review of our actual financial and operational performance for fiscal 2016 as compared to the pre-established target levels, the Compensation Committee approved a bonus payout to our NEOs based on the achievement of the financial objectives at 0% of target performance and the operational objectives at 82.5% of target performance, which resulted in an aggregate bonus payout of 16.5% of target performance based on the weighting between financial and operational objectives. No adjustments were made to the payouts of any of our NEOs, including our CEO, based on individual performance. The following table sets forth the bonus payments earned for fiscal 2016 by our NEOs pursuant to the 2016 Bonus Plan.
Name |
Fiscal 2016 Final Bonus Payout(1) |
|||
Thomas J. Fallon |
$ | 134,062 | ||
Brad D. Feller |
$ | 49,500 | ||
David F. Welch, Ph.D. |
$ | 74,250 | ||
Robert J. Jandro |
$ | 60,225 | ||
James L. Laufman |
$ | 36,135 |
(1) | Bonuses were paid in March 2017. |
Long-Term Incentive Compensation
Our long-term incentive compensation opportunities are delivered in the form of equity awards. Annual equity awards for NEOs are approved by the Compensation Committee during the first open trading window of each new calendar year.
Equity Compensation Design. Under the 2016 Plan, and before its approval by stockholders the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan (the 2007 Plan), the Compensation Committee grants equity awards to eligible employees, including our NEOs. The Compensation Committee actively monitors our annual aggregate equity utilization as measured by our burn rate.
The Compensation Committee believes that it is in the best interests of Infinera and our stockholders to grant performance-based equity awards to senior employees, including our NEOs. It also believes that our performance-based equity awards foster a pay-for-performance culture and multi-year vesting schedules create longer-term incentives that maintain alignment of the interests of our NEOs with those of our stockholders. Our NEOs benefit from these equity awards based on our sustained performance over time and the ability of our NEOs to create the results that drive stockholder value.
32
In determining the appropriate mix of such equity awards, the Compensation Committee considered how each equity vehicle supports our compensation strategy as follows:
Type of Award |
Description |
Why It Is Used | ||
RSU Award |
Provide the opportunity to earn a specified number of shares of Infinera common stock subject to the participants continued employment for a specified period.
Typically have a three-year or four-year vesting period to encourage a long-term perspective and to encourage key employees to remain at Infinera. |
Supports retention and succession planning.
Provides a direct incentive for future performance.
Useful in recruiting new executives. | ||
PSU Award |
Provide the opportunity to earn shares of Infinera common stock upon the achievement of pre-established performance objectives.
If the threshold performance level is not achieved, the entire portion of the award tied to such performance objective is forfeited. |
Supports pay-for-performance philosophy and retention efforts.
Links compensation directly to Infinera performance in areas identified as important by the Compensation Committee. |
In February 2016, the Compensation Committee granted annual equity awards for fiscal 2016 in the form of a time-based RSU award and a PSU award to each of our NEOs. For the PSU award in fiscal 2016, the Compensation Committee determined that with regards to the target value typically assigned to the PSU awards that 100% of the target value would be assigned to the 2016 TSR Award. This approach generally is consistent with the last several years PSU awards, with the exception of the CX PSU Award grants in fiscal 2015, which were a one-time, performance-based incentive to drive revenue performance related to our then-new Cloud Xpress family of products. The Compensation Committee continued to believe that TSR remains an important metric for driving performance and promoting the alignment of the interests of our NEOs with those of our stockholders.
In determining the size of these annual equity awards, the Compensation Committee considered the factors described above in the sections entitled Use of Market Data and Relevant Qualitative Factors, with particular attention to internal equity considerations, the potential dilutive impact of the equity awards and the amount and value of unvested equity awards held by each of our NEOs. The Compensation Committee believed a combination of time-based and performance-based equity awards promote close alignment of the interests of our NEOs with those of our stockholders. In addition, in awarding the same number of shares to the CEO and President, the Compensation Committee considered the value of the partnership in creating long-term value for the stockholders.
The following table sets forth the NEO equity awards in the fiscal 2016 program:
Number of Shares Subject to RSU Awards |
2016 TSR Awards | |||||||||||
Name |
Target Number of Shares |
Maximum Number of Shares (200% of Target) |
||||||||||
Thomas J. Fallon |
86,850 | 135,990 | 271,980 | |||||||||
Brad D. Feller |
32,270 | 33,690 | 67,380 | |||||||||
David F. Welch, Ph.D. |
86,850 | 135,990 | 271,980 | |||||||||
Robert J. Jandro |
31,320 | 32,700 | 65,400 | |||||||||
James L. Laufman |
29,220 | 30,500 | 61,000 |
The RSU awards in the table above vest in annual installments with one-fourth of the underlying shares of Infinera common stock vesting on May 5 of each of 2017, 2018, 2019 and 2020, subject to the NEOs continued service with Infinera through each applicable vesting date.
33
The shares of Infinera common stock subject to the 2016 TSR Award are eligible to vest based on our TSR performance relative to the S&P Networking Index over the applicable performance periods (as discussed below). The Compensation Committee selected relative TSR as the performance measure for this PSU award because it believes that our relative TSR is an important indicator of our long-term success and closely aligns the interests of our NEOs with those of our stockholders. In choosing an appropriate comparator group, the Compensation Committee selected the S&P Networking Index based on a review of its components (including the fact that Infinera is a component of the index, which shows its relevance), the relatively close correlation between our historical stock price movement and that of the S&P Networking Index, as well as the importance of the multimedia networking industry to our business.
Our relative TSR is measured against the S&P Networking Index at three intervals for the 2016 TSR Award, with one-third of the total number of shares of Infinera common stock subject to each NEOs 2016 TSR Award allocated to each of the three performance periods. For purposes of calculating TSR performance for Infinera and the S&P Networking Index, the performance periods are as follows:
(i) | For the first performance period, the starting price is the 60-day average (of our closing stock price or the index, as applicable) leading up to and inclusive of December 26, 2015 (the last day of fiscal 2015), and the ending price is the 60-day average leading up to and inclusive of the last day of fiscal 2016; |
(ii) | For the second performance period, the starting price is the 60-day average leading up to and inclusive of December 26, 2015 (the last day of fiscal 2015), and the ending price is the 60-day average leading up to and inclusive of the last day of fiscal 2017; and |
(iii) | For the third performance period, the starting price is the 60-day average leading up to and inclusive of December 26, 2015 (the last day of fiscal 2015), and the ending price is the 60-day average leading up to and inclusive of the last day of fiscal 2018. |
The table below summarizes the performance criteria used to determine the percentage of the shares subject to the 2016 TSR Award that would be eligible to vest by our NEOs for various levels of TSR performance relative to the S&P Networking Index for each performance period.
Minimum | Target | Maximum | Payment is capped at target if TSR is
| |||||||||||
INFN TSR vs. Index |
-33 Points | Match | +50 Points | |||||||||||
Payment as a Percentage of Target |
0 | % | 100 | % | 200 | % | ||||||||
Slope |
3 to 1 | | 2 to 1 |
As shown above, for each point of positive TSR we deliver above the TSR for the S&P Networking Index, the number of shares eligible to vest increases by 2% up to a maximum of 200% of the target award level. For each point of TSR we deliver below the TSR for the S&P Networking Index, the number of shares eligible to vest decreases by 3% and can be reduced to 0% of the target award level. The maximum cap was increased from 150% in fiscal 2015 to 200% for fiscal 2016. In conjunction with increasing the maximum cap, the performance threshold required to achieve the maximum payout also was increased by 25% so that our TSR must outperform the TSR of the S&P Networking Index by 50%. The Compensation Committee believed that it was appropriate to increase the maximum cap and maximum performance threshold required for such payout under the 2016 TSR Award, in order to provide strong incentive to continue driving the Companys TSR and reward high levels of performance.
Notwithstanding our TSR performance relative to the S&P Networking Index, if our TSR is negative for any performance period, the potential payout will be capped at 100% of the target number of shares allocated to that period. The 2016 TSR Award will be forfeited upon failure to achieve the TSR threshold for the relevant period, with the exception that if any shares allocated to the first and second performance periods would have otherwise vested but for the 100% cap imposed by a negative TSR for that period, then with respect to the first performance period, those shares may vest based on TSR performance for the second period criteria, or with respect to the second period, those shares may vest based on TSR performance for the third period, provided in each case that our TSR is positive and results achieved are at or above 100% of target for the applicable subsequent performance period.
34
As disclosed in last years proxy statement, for executive officer awards measuring TSR against an index, the Compensation Committee has determined that the start of the measurement period will be the 60-day average (of our closing stock price or the index, as applicable) leading up to and inclusive of the last day of the fiscal year prior to the grant of the award.
PSU Results. For the initial performance period ended December 31, 2016 under the 2016 TSR Award, our TSR performance underperformed the TSR performance of the S&P Networking Index by approximately 76 points. As a result, 0% of the target number of shares of Infinera common stock allocated to the initial performance period vested, as shown in the table below.
2016 TSR Award Summary for Initial Performance Period | ||||||||
Name |
Target Number of PSUs Granted | Actual Number of PSUs Vested | ||||||
Thomas J. Fallon |
135,990 | 0 | ||||||
Brad D. Feller |
33,690 | 0 | ||||||
David F. Welch, Ph.D. |
135,990 | 0 | ||||||
Robert J. Jandro |
32,700 | 0 | ||||||
James L. Laufman |
30,500 | 0 |
Outstanding PSU Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years. The following table provides information regarding outstanding PSU awards granted prior to fiscal 2016 that were eligible to be earned in fiscal 2016 by our NEOs, including the performance requirements and number of shares of Infinera common stock earned through fiscal 2016.
Name |
Fiscal Year of Grant |
Total Target Number of PSUs Granted in Grant Year (#) |
Target Number of Shares that Could Vest for Fiscal 2016 Performance Period (#) |
Maximum Number of Shares that Could Vest for Fiscal 2016 Performance Period (#) |
Actual Number of Shares Vested for Fiscal 2016 Performance Period (#) |
Performance | ||||||||||||||||
Thomas J. Fallon |
2015 | 51,920 | 17,307 | 25,960 | 0 | Relative TSR(1) | ||||||||||||||||
2015 | 27,620 | 27,620 | 55,240 | 37,563 | CX Revenue(2) | |||||||||||||||||
2014 | 160,330 | 53,443 | 80,164 | 0 | Relative TSR(3) | |||||||||||||||||
Brad D. Feller |
2015 | 11,630 | 3,877 | 5,815 | 0 | Relative TSR(1) | ||||||||||||||||
2015 | 6,190 | 6,190 | 12,380 | 8,418 | CX Revenue(2) | |||||||||||||||||
David F. Welch, Ph.D. |
2015 | 18,030 | 6,010 | 9,015 | 0 | Relative TSR(1) | ||||||||||||||||
2015 | 9,590 | 9,590 | 19,180 | 13,042 | CX Revenue(2) | |||||||||||||||||
2014 | 41,847 | 13,949 | 20,923 | 0 | Relative TSR(3) | |||||||||||||||||
Robert J. Jandro |
2015 | 11,270 | 3,757 | 5,635 | 0 | Relative TSR(1) | ||||||||||||||||
2015 | 6,000 | 6,000 | 12,000 | 8,160 | CX Revenue(2) | |||||||||||||||||
2014 | 27,079 | 9,026 | 13,539 | 0 | Relative TSR(3) |
(1) | In fiscal 2015, the Compensation Committee granted to the then-current NEOs a PSU award that measures our TSR against the TSR of the S&P Networking Index. This PSU award pays out at 150% if our TSR outperforms the S&P Networking Index by 25 points or more and 0% if our TSR underperforms the S&P Networking Index by 33 points or more. Our TSR performance underperformed the TSR performance of this index by approximately 67 points for the performance period measured, which resulted in no payout for this performance period. For the second performance period, the start price was the 60-day average (of our closing stock price or the index value, as applicable) leading up to and inclusive of February 24, 2015 and the end price was the 60-day average (of our closing stock price or the index value, as applicable) leading up to and inclusive of the last day of fiscal 2016. |
(2) | In fiscal 2015, the Compensation Committee granted to the then-current NEOs a PSU award that measures the cumulative revenue performance of the then-new Cloud Xpress family of products over a period of 18 months. At the minimum threshold performance level, 100% of the target shares may be earned and at two times the minimum threshold revenue, 200% of the target shares may be earned. No shares would be earned if actual performance fell below the minimum threshold revenue level. For the first measurement period of this award, which measured cumulative revenue performance during fiscal 2015, no shares were earned. Revenue performance was also measured from the first day of fiscal 2015 through the second quarter of fiscal 2016, which resulted in a payout at 136% of target. |
(3) | In fiscal 2014, the Compensation Committee granted to the then-current NEOs a PSU award that measures our TSR against the TSR of the S&P Networking Index. This PSU award pays out at 150% if our TSR outperforms the S&P Networking Index by 25 points or more and 0% if our TSR underperforms the S&P Networking Index by 33 points or more. Our TSR |
35
performance underperformed the TSR performance of this index by approximately 36 points for the performance period measured, which resulted in no payout for this performance period. For the third and final performance period, the start price was the 60-day average (of our closing stock price or the index value, as applicable) leading up to and inclusive of February 25, 2014 and the end price was the 60-day average (of our closing stock price or the index value, as applicable) leading up to and inclusive of the last day of fiscal 2016. |
Employee Benefits and Perquisites
Our NEOs are only eligible to receive the same benefits as our U.S. salaried employees except with respect to accrued paid time off (PTO) as explained below. Infinera and the Compensation Committee believe this approach is reasonable and consistent with the overall compensation objectives to attract and retain employees. These benefits include medical, dental, vision and disability benefits, a Section 401(k) plan, and other plans and programs, including the Infinera Corporation 2007 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (2007 ESPP), made available to other eligible employees in the applicable country of residence. In fiscal 2016, we began to provide a matching contribution under the Section 401(k) plan that is applicable to all eligible participants, including our NEOs. Employee benefits and perquisites are reviewed periodically to ensure that benefit levels remain competitive, but are not included in the Compensation Committees annual determination of the total compensation for each of our NEOs.
U.S. employees at the Senior Vice President level and above, at any U.S. work location, participate in our As Needed PTO Program. Under this program, these employees may schedule PTO as they see fit and as business necessity allows, although they must continue to meet all job expectations and remain responsible for ensuring appropriate coverage for the time they will be out of the office. Under this program, PTO does not accrue for these employees.
Additional Information Regarding Our Compensation Practices
Change of Control Payments and Benefits
The Compensation Committee considers maintaining a stable and effective management team to be essential to protecting the best interests of Infinera and its stockholders. Accordingly, Infinera has entered into Change of Control Agreements (the COC Agreements) with certain Vice President level officers and above, including each of our NEOs, to encourage their continued attention, dedication and continuity with respect to their roles and responsibilities without the distraction that may arise from the possibility or occurrence of a change of control of Infinera.
An NEO will receive payments and benefits under his or her COC Agreement only if his or her employment is terminated without cause, or by him or her as a result of a constructive termination (as more fully described in the section entitled Estimated Payments and Benefits upon Termination, Change of Control or Death/Disability below), within 12 months following a change of control of Infinera. The Compensation Committee believes that this double-trigger structure provides an appropriate balance between the corporate objectives described above and the potential compensation payable to each NEO upon a change of control. The Compensation Committee also believes that should Infinera engage in any discussions or negotiations relating to a change of control that the Board believes is in the best interests of our stockholders, these COC Agreements will help to ensure that our NEOs remain focused on the consummation of such potential transaction, without significant distraction or concern regarding their personal circumstances, such as continued employment.
The following terms apply with respect to our NEOs if we undergo a change of control and the NEOs employment is terminated without cause or as a result of a constructive termination within 12 months following the change of control of Infinera, subject to such individual entering into and not revoking a release of claims in our favor within 60 days of the termination date:
| 100% of all outstanding equity awards will vest; |
| Our CEO will be paid a lump sum severance payment equal to two times his annual base salary and our other NEOs will be paid a lump sum severance payment equal to one and one-half times their annual base salary; and |
| Our CEO will be reimbursed for premiums under COBRA for a period of 24 months and our other NEOs will be reimbursed for premiums under COBRA for a period of 18 months. |
36
Executive Severance Policy
In addition to the change of control-related payments and benefits discussed above, the Compensation Committee has taken appropriate steps to provide competitive post-employment compensation arrangements that promote the continued attention, dedication and continuity of the members of our senior management team, including our NEOs, and enable us to continue to recruit talented senior executive officers. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee has adopted an executive severance policy, under which the following severance payments and benefits will become payable if the employment of one of our NEOs is terminated by us without cause (as defined in the policy) subject to such individual entering into and not revoking a release of claims in our favor:
| Our CEO will be paid a lump sum severance payment equal to one and one-half times his annual base salary and our other NEOs will be paid a lump sum severance payment equal to one times their annual base salary; and |
| Our CEO will be reimbursed for premiums under COBRA for a period of 18 months and our other NEOs will be reimbursed for premiums under COBRA for a period of 12 months. |
If an NEOs employment with Infinera is less than one year, the amount of severance payable to such individual will be equal to the lesser of (x) the base salary paid to such individual during his or her period of employment, or (y) the severance amount set forth above.
Acceleration of Equity Awards upon Death or Disability. In addition, all awards granted under our equity incentive plans permit accelerated vesting in the event of an employees death or terminal illness (with exceptions in certain circumstances). Because we do not have any other policy with respect to severance payments or benefits in the event of an employees death or disability, the Compensation Committee believes that in the event of an employees death or terminal illness, it would be appropriate to provide the accelerated vesting of his or her RSU awards, PSU awards and stock options.
The estimated payments and benefits that would be received by each NEO in connection with a qualifying termination of employment are presented in the section entitled Estimated Payments and Benefits upon Termination, Change of Control or Death/Disability below.
Equity Grant Policy
Under our Equity Grant Policy, a Subcommittee of the Compensation Committee has been delegated the authority to grant new hire, promotional and annual retention equity awards to non-executive employees pursuant to certain pre-approved guidelines. This Subcommittee is currently comprised of our CEO, General Counsel and Senior Vice President of Human Resources.
The Subcommittee generally meets on the second Monday of each month to approve new hire and promotional equity awards that are within pre-approved guidelines established by the Compensation Committee. Annual retention equity awards for such non-executive employees are also scheduled to occur as part of the monthly meetings of the Subcommittee. The delegation to the Subcommittee does not include the authority to grant equity awards to new employees who are or are reasonably expected to become Section 16 Officers or to current Section 16 Officers.
Executive Clawback Policy
We maintain an Executive Clawback Policy that applies to our Section 16 Officers (which includes each of our NEOs) and directors. Pursuant to this policy, the Compensation Committee has the authority to seek:
| Repayment of any cash incentive payment; |
| Cancellation of unvested, unexercised or unreleased equity awards; and |
| Repayment of any compensation earned on previously exercised or released equity awards, |
where such payments, equity awards and/or compensation earned on previously exercised or released cash incentive payments and equity awards was predicated on financial results that were augmented by fraud,
37
embezzlement, gross negligence or deliberate disregard of applicable rules resulting in significant monetary loss, damage or injury to Infinera (the Excess Compensation), whether or not such activity resulted in a financial restatement. The Compensation Committee shall have sole discretion under this policy, consistent with any applicable statutory requirements, to seek reimbursement for any Excess Compensation paid or received by a Section 16 Officer or director for up to a 12-month period prior to the date of the Compensation Committee action to require reimbursement of the Excess Compensation. Further, following a restatement of our financial statements, we will recover any compensation received by our CEO and CFO that is required to be recovered by Section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
For purposes of this policy, Excess Compensation will be measured as the positive difference, if any, between the compensation earned by a Section 16 Officer or director and the compensation that would have been earned by a Section 16 Officer or director had the fraud, embezzlement, gross negligence or deliberate disregard of applicable rules resulting in significant monetary loss, damage or injury to Infinera not occurred.
Stock Ownership Policy
The Board believes that it is important to link the interests of our NEOs to those of our stockholders. Our Stock Ownership Policy requires our non-employee directors and Section 16 Officers (which includes each of our NEOs) to accumulate and hold a minimum number of shares of Infinera common stock within three years of the later of (i) the effective date of the policy or (ii) the date of appointment of the director or appointment/promotion of the Section 16 Officer. As of the Record Date, each of our Section 16 Officers and the non-employee members of the Board has either satisfied these ownership guidelines or had time remaining to do so. The specific Infinera stock ownership requirements for our Section 16 Officers and non-employee directors as a multiple of annual base salary (or cash retainer, in the case of the non-employee directors) are as follows:
CEO: |
4x annual base salary | |
President: |
2x annual base salary | |
CFO: |
2x annual base salary | |
Other NEOs: |
1x annual base salary | |
Non-employee directors: |
4x annual cash retainer |
Shares of Infinera common stock that count towards satisfaction of this policy include: (i) shares owned outright by the Section 16 Officer or non-employee director or his or her immediate family members residing in the same household; (ii) shares held in trust for the benefit of the Section 16 Officer or non-employee director or his or her family; and (iii) shares subject to vested, unexercised, in-the-money stock options (the spread or intrinsic value of options). The value of a share of Infinera common stock is measured on the last day of the fiscal year as the greater of (i) the closing price on the date of calculation or (ii) the purchase price actually paid by the person for such share of Infinera common stock (for the avoidance of doubt, the purchase price for shares of Infinera common stock subject to RSU awards, PSU awards and other similar full value awards is zero).
Anti-hedging Policy
Under our Insider Trading Policy, we prohibit our employees, including our NEOs, from hedging the risk associated with ownership of shares of Infinera common stock and other securities.
Anti-pledging Policy
Under our Insider Trading Policy, we prohibit our NEOs and directors from pledging any Infinera securities as collateral for a loan.
Tax and Accounting Treatment of Compensation
Section 162(m) limits the amount that we may deduct for compensation paid to our CEO and to our three other most highly compensated executive officers (other than our CFO) to $1 million per individual in any tax year, unless such compensation is exempt from the deduction limit. One exemption from this deduction limit is available for various forms of qualified performance-based compensation.
38
While it cannot predict how the deduction limit may impact our executive compensation program in future years, the Compensation Committee intends to maintain an approach to executive compensation that strongly links pay to performance. While it has not adopted a formal policy regarding tax deductibility of compensation paid to our CEO and other senior executive officers, the Compensation Committee intends to consider tax deductibility under Section 162(m) as a factor in its compensation decisions. For example, in 2016, our stockholders approved the 2016 Plan that permits us to grant equity awards intended to qualify as performance-based with the meaning of Section 162(m). However, from time to time, the Compensation Committee may provide compensation or grant equity awards to our executive officers that may not be deductible when, for example, we believe that such compensation is appropriate and in the best interests of our stockholders
We account for the equity compensation awarded to our executive officers and other employees under ASC 718, which requires us to estimate and record an expense for each award of equity compensation over the service period of the award. Accounting rules also require us to record cash compensation as an expense at the time the obligation is incurred.
The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management. Based on its review and discussions with management, the Compensation Committee has recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement.
Compensation Committee
Marcel Gani (Chair)
Paul J. Milbury
John P. Daane
39
The following tabular information and accompanying narratives and footnotes provide all of the compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to the individuals who served as our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and our three other highest paid executive officers during fiscal 2016. As previously noted, we refer to these executive officers as our NEOs.
Fiscal 2016 Summary Compensation Table
Name and Principal |
Year | Salary ($) |
Bonus ($) |
Stock Awards ($)(1) |
Option Awards ($)(1) |
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)(2) |
All Other Compensation ($)(3) |
Total ($) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Thomas J. Fallon |
2016 | 648,308 | | 3,300,134 | | 134,062 | (4) | 312 | 4,082,816 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
CEO |
2015 | 526,298 | | 2,383,666 | | 884,250 | (5) | 312 | 3,794,526 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 | 468,029 | | 2,036,202 | | 808,594 | (5) | 16,423 | 3,329,248 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brad D. Feller |
2016 | 399,385 | | 981,030 | | 49,500 | (4) | 312 | 1,430,227 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
CFO |
2015 | 360,000 | | 641,511 | | 330,120 | (5) | 281 | 1,331,912 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 | 346,154 | 30,000 | 1,499,999 | 96,323 | 285,796 | (5) | 1,034 | 2,259,306 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
David F. Welch, Ph.D. |
2016 | 499,231 | | 3,300,134 | | 74,250 | (4) | 312 | 3,873,927 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
President |
2015 | 435,577 | | 1,494,385 | | 471,600 | (5) | 312 | 2,401,874 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 | 374,885 | | 822,290 | | 414,000 | (5) | 31,774 | 1,642,949 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Robert J. Jandro |
2016 | 364,769 | | 952,176 | | 60,225 | (4) | 285 | 1,377,455 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Senior Vice President, Worldwide Sales |
|
2015 2014 |
|
|
350,000 350,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
621,760 532,106 |
|
|
|
|
|
458,500 483,000 |
(5) (5) |
|
273 11,068 |
|
|
1,430,533 1,376,174 |
| ||||||||
James L. Laufman |
2016 | 364,385 | | 888,222 | | 36,135 | (4) | 285 | 1,289,027 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary |
|
2015 2014 |
|
|
325,000 62,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
999,996 |
|
|
|
|
|
255,450 |
(5)
|
|
254 59 |
|
|
580,704 1,062,555 |
|
(1) | The amounts reported in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair value of the listed equity awards, computed in accordance with ASC 718. See Notes 2 and 14 of the notes to our consolidated financial statements contained in our 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on February 23, 2017 for a discussion of all assumptions made by us in determining the ASC 718 values of equity awards. |
(2) | The amounts reported in this column represent payouts under our annual cash incentive plan. |
(3) | For fiscal 2016 and 2015, this amount represented the payment of life insurance premiums. For fiscal 2014, this amount represented the payment of accrued vacation time and life insurance premiums. |
(4) | The amounts reported represent annual incentive cash awards earned under the 2016 Bonus Plan. For additional information regarding the 2016 Bonus Plan, please see the section entitled Fiscal 2016 CompensationPerformance-Based Incentive Cash Compensation (2016 Bonus Plan) in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis above. |
(5) | The amounts reported represent annual incentive cash awards earned under our bonus plan for fiscal 2015 and 2014. |
40
Fiscal 2016 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table
The following table sets forth information regarding fiscal 2016 annual cash incentive compensation and equity awards granted to our NEOs during fiscal 2016.
Name |
Grant Date |
Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1) |
Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards |
All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units (#) |
All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options (#) |
Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards ($/Sh) |
Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards ($)(2) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold ($) |
Target ($) |
Maximum ($) |
Threshold (#) |
Target (#) |
Maximum (#) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Thomas J. Fallon |
2/23/2016 | | 812,500 | 1,218,750 | | | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/23/2016 | | | | | | | 86,850 | (3) | | | 1,320,120 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/23/2016 | | | | | 135,990 | (4) | 271,980 | (4) | | | | 1,980,014 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brad D. Feller |
2/23/2016 | | 300,000 | 450,000 | | | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/23/2016 | | | | | | | 32,270 | (3) | | | 490,504 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/23/2016 | | | | | 33,690 | (4) | 67,380 | (4) | | | | 490,526 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
David F. Welch, Ph.D. |
2/23/2016 | | 450,000 | 675,000 | | | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/23/2016 | | | | | | | 86,850 | (3) | | | 1,320,120 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/23/2016 | | | | | 135,990 | (4) | 271,980 | (4) | | | | 1,980,014 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Robert J. Jandro |
2/23/2016 | | 365,000 | 547,500 | | | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/23/2016 | | | | | | | 31,320 | (3) | | | 476,064 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/23/2016 | | | | | 32,700 | (4) | 65,400 | (4) | | | | 476,112 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
James L. Laufman |
2/23/2016 | | 219,000 | 328,500 | | | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/23/2016 | | | | | | | 29,220 | (3) | | | 444,144 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/23/2016 | | | | | 30,500 | (4) | 61,000 | (4) | | | | 444,078 |
(1) | Represents the potential cash payment that may be earned for fiscal 2016 under the 2016 Bonus Plan. For additional information regarding the 2016 Bonus Plan and final payouts, please see the section entitled Fiscal 2016 CompensationPerformance-Based Incentive Cash Compensation (2016 Bonus Plan) in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis above. |
(2) | For RSUs, represents the aggregate grant date fair value of each equity award computed in accordance with ASC 718. For PSUs, represents the aggregate grant date fair value of each equity award at the target payout level computed in accordance with ASC 718. See Notes 2 and 14 of the notes to our consolidated financial statements contained in our 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on February 23, 2017 for a discussion of all assumptions made by us in determining the ASC 718 values of equity awards. |
(3) | These RSU awards are scheduled to vest in annual installments with one-fourth of the underlying shares vesting on May 5 of each of 2017, 2018, 2019 and 2020, subject to each NEOs continued service to Infinera through each applicable vesting date. |
(4) | This PSU award is earned based on our TSR as compared to the S&P Networking Index for the one-, two- and three-year performance periods running from the first day of fiscal 2016 through the end of fiscal 2016, 2017 and 2018, and subject to each NEOs continued service to Infinera through each applicable vesting date. The vesting date shall be the fifth day of the month after certification of the award, which certification typically takes place in February for the prior performance period. If the performance objectives are not met within the time limits specified in the award agreements, the PSUs will be cancelled. For additional information regarding the PSU awards granted to our NEOs in fiscal 2016, please see the section entitled Fiscal 2016 CompensationLong-Term Incentive Compensation in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis above. |
41
Fiscal 2016 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End Table
The following table sets forth information regarding outstanding stock options, RSU awards and PSU awards held by each of our NEOs as of December 31, 2016. The vesting conditions for each award are set forth in the footnotes below the table.
Stock Option Awards | Stock Awards | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name |
Grant Date |
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable |
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable |
Option Exercise Price ($) |
Option Expiration Date |
Grant Date | Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#) |
Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)(1) |
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#) |
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value or Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)(1) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Thomas J. Fallon |
11/23/2009 | 90,056 | | (2) | 8.19 | 11/23/2019 | 2/25/2014 | 35,629 | (3) | 302,490 | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/10/2011 | 14,286 | | (2) | 8.58 | 2/10/2021 | 2/25/2014 | | | 53,443 | (4) | 453,731 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/10/2011 | 32,965 | | (2) | 8.58 | 2/10/2021 | 2/24/2015 | 36,826 | (5) | 312,653 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/10/2011 | 30,475 | | (2) | 8.58 | 2/10/2021 | 2/24/2015 | | | 34,613 | (6) | 293,864 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/10/2011 | 182,250 | | (2) | 8.58 | 2/10/2021 | 2/23/2016 | 86,850 | (7) | 737,357 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | 2/23/2016 | | | 135,990 | (8) | 1,154,555 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brad D. Feller |
1/13/2014 | 18,229 | 6,771 | (9) | 9.02 | 1/13/2021 | 1/13/2014 | 83,148 | (10) | 705,927 | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | 2/24/2015 | 12,373 | (5) | 105,047 | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | 2/24/2015 | | | 7,753 | (6) | 65,823 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | 2/23/2016 | 32,270 | (7) | 273,972 | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | 2/23/2016 | | | 33,690 | (8) | 286,028 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
David F. Welch, Ph.D. |
2/10/2009 | 100,000 | | (2) | 7.11 | 2/10/2019 | 6/19/2013 | 12,000 | (11) | 101,880 | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8/10/2009 | 150,000 | | (2) | 7.45 | 8/10/2019 | 2/25/2014 | 20,923 | (3) | 177,636 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/22/2010 | 29,214 | | (2) | 7.61 | 6/6/2017 | 2/25/2014 | | | 13,949 | (4) | 118,427 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/22/2010 | 101,342 | | (2) | 7.61 | 6/6/2017 | 2/24/2015 | 19,180 | (5) | 162,838 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/22/2010 | 2,817 | | (2) | 7.61 | 2/28/2018 | 2/24/2015 | 28,770 | (12) | 244,257 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/22/2010 | 81,683 | | (2) | 7.61 | 2/28/2018 | 2/24/2015 | | | 12,020 | (6) | 102,050 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/10/2011 | 39,465 | | (2) | 8.58 | 2/10/2021 | 2/23/2016 | 86,850 | (7) | 737,357 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/10/2011 | 41,535 | | (2) | 8.58 | 2/10/2021 | 2/23/2016 | | | 135,990 | (8) | 1,154,555 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/10/2011 | 20,250 | | (2) | 8.58 | 2/10/2021 | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/10/2011 | 60,750 | | (2) | 8.58 | 2/10/2021 | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Robert J. Jandro |
| | | | | 7/1/2013 | 30,000 | (11) | 254,700 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | 2/25/2014 | 13,539 | (3) | 114,946 | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | 2/25/2014 | | | 9,026 | (4) | 76,631 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | 2/24/2015 | 11,993 | (5) | 101,821 | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | 2/24/2015 | | | 7,513 | (6) | 63,785 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | 2/23/2016 | 31,320 | (7) | 265,907 | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | 2/23/2016 | | | 32,700 | (8) | 277,623 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
James L. Laufman |
| | | | | 10/20/2014 | 47,303 | (13) | 401,602 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | 2/23/2016 | 29,220 | (7) | 248,078 | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | 2/23/2016 | | | 30,500 | (8) | 258,945 |
42
(1) | The closing price of our common stock as of the last trading day prior to our fiscal year end, December 30, 2016, was $8.49 per share, which was used as the value of our common stock in the calculations. |
(2) | This stock option grant is fully vested. |
(3) | The remaining unvested portion of this RSU grant vests in its entirety on May 5, 2017, subject to the NEOs continued service to Infinera through each applicable vesting date. |
(4) | This PSU award can be earned based on our TSR performance relative to that of the S&P Networking Index as measured over one-, two- and three-year performance periods. For purposes of calculating TSR performance for Infinera and the S&P Networking Index under the PSU awards, the baseline value for our relative TSR calculations is the 60-day average closing price of our common stock and the S&P Networking Index leading up to February 25, 2014, which was the grant date of the awards. TSR for Infinera and the S&P Networking Index is then calculated by comparing the average closing price of our common stock and the S&P Networking Index to this baseline value for the final 60 days of our fiscal 2014, 2015 and 2016. This PSU award pays out at a maximum of 150% if our TSR outperforms the S&P Networking Index by 25 points or more and 0% if our TSR underperforms the S&P Networking Index by 33 points or more. No PSUs subject to this award vested in March 2017, as the achievement of the third and final performance period was not met. |
(5) | The remaining unvested portion of this RSU grant vests in its entirety on May 5, 2018, subject to the NEOs continued service to Infinera through each applicable vesting date. |
(6) | This PSU award can be earned based on our TSR performance relative to that of the S&P Networking Index as measured over one-, two- and three-year performance periods. For purposes of calculating TSR performance for Infinera and the S&P Networking Index under the PSU awards, the baseline value for our relative TSR calculations is the 60-day average closing price of our common stock and the S&P Networking Index leading up to February 24, 2015, which was the grant date of the awards. TSR for Infinera and the S&P Networking Index is then calculated by comparing the average closing price of our common stock and the S&P Networking Index to this baseline value for the final 60 days of our fiscal 2015, 2016 and 2017. This PSU award pays out at a maximum of 150% if our TSR outperforms the S&P Networking Index by 25 points or more and 0% if our TSR underperforms the S&P Networking Index by 33 points or more. No PSUs subject to this award vested in March 2017, as the achievement of the second performance period was not met. |
(7) | The remaining unvested portion of this RSU grants vests in its entirety on May 5, 2020, subject to the NEOs continued service to Infinera through each applicable vesting date. |
(8) | This PSU award can be earned based on our TSR performance relative to that of the S&P Networking Index as measured over one-, two- and three-year performance periods. For purposes of calculating TSR performance for Infinera and the S&P Networking Index under the PSU awards, the baseline value for our relative TSR calculations is the 60-day average closing price of our common stock and the S&P Networking Index leading up to and inclusive of December 26, 2015, which was the last day of fiscal 2015. TSR for Infinera and the S&P Networking Index is then calculated by comparing the average closing price of our common stock and the S&P Networking Index to this baseline value for the final 60 days of our fiscal 2016, 2017 and 2018. This PSU award pays out at a maximum of 200% if our TSR outperforms the S&P Networking Index by 50 points or more and 0% if our TSR underperforms the S&P Networking Index by 33 points or more. No PSUs subject to his award vested in March 2017, as the achievement of the first performance period was not met. For a more detailed description of this PSU award, please see the section entitled Fiscal 2016 CompensationLong-Term Incentive Compensation in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis above. |
(9) | This option vests and becomes exercisable as to 1/4th of the underlying shares on January 13, 2015 and then 1/48th per month thereafter, subject to Mr. Fellers continued service to Infinera through each applicable vesting date. |
(10) | The remaining unvested portion of this RSU grant vests in its entirety on February 5, 2018, subject to Mr. Fellers continued service to Infinera through each applicable vesting date. |
(11) | The remaining unvested portion of this RSU grant vests in its entirety on August 5, 2017, subject to the NEOs continued service to Infinera through each applicable vesting date. |
(12) | The remaining unvested portion of this RSU grant vests as to one-half of the underlying shares vesting on May 5, 2017 and one-half of the shares on May 5, 2018, subject to Dr. Welchs continued service to Infinera through each applicable vesting date. |
(13) | The remaining unvested portion of this RSU grant vests in its entirety on November 5, 2018, subject to Mr. Laufmans continued service to Infinera through each applicable vesting date. |
43
Fiscal 2016 Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table
The following table sets forth the number of shares acquired and the value realized upon the exercise of stock options and the vesting of RSU awards and PSU awards during fiscal 2016 by each of our NEOs.
Name |
Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#) |
Value Realized on Exercise ($)(1) |
Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#) |
Value Realized on Vesting ($)(2) |
||||||||||||
Thomas J. Fallon |
| | 320,395 | 4,288,182 | ||||||||||||
Brad D. Feller |
| | 61,994 | 834,696 | ||||||||||||
David F. Welch, Ph.D. |
262,500 | 1,435,500 | 142,993 | 1,855,995 | ||||||||||||
Robert J. Jandro |
| | 76,871 | 865,383 | ||||||||||||
James L. Laufman |
| | 23,652 | 173,133 |
(1) | The value realized on the exercise date is based on the difference in the fair market value of our common stock on the exercise date and the exercise price, and does not necessarily reflect the proceeds actually received by the NEO. |
(2) | The value realized on the vesting date is based on the fair market value of our common stock on the vesting date and does not necessarily reflect the proceeds actually received by the NEO. |
Estimated Payments and Benefits upon Termination, Change of Control or Death/Disability
Change of Control Payments and Benefits
As discussed above in more detail in the section entitled Compensation Discussion and AnalysisAdditional Information Regarding Our Compensation PracticesChange of Control Payments and Benefits, Infinera has entered into COC Agreements with certain Vice President level officers and above, including each of our NEOs, to encourage their continued attention, dedication and continuity with respect to their roles and responsibilities without the distraction that may arise from the possibility or occurrence of a change of control of Infinera.
Executive Severance Policy
As discussed above in more detail in the section entitled Compensation Discussion and AnalysisAdditional Information Regarding Our Compensation PracticesExecutive Severance Policy, the Compensation Committee has taken appropriate steps to provide competitive post-employment compensation arrangements that promote the continued attention, dedication and continuity of the members of our senior management team, including our NEOs, and enable us to continue to recruit talented senior executive officers. Infinera shall not pay severance pursuant to this policy to the individuals subject to this policy in the event of (i) a change of control of Infinera (as defined below), or (ii) if such individual is terminated for Cause (as defined below).
Death and Disability Benefits
Pursuant to the 2007 Plan and the 2016 Plan, accelerated vesting is provided in the event of the death (with exceptions in certain circumstances) or permanent disability of an employee, including our NEOs. Accrued vacation will also be paid out in the event of the death or permanent disability of such individual. We do not currently provide any other benefits in the event of an employees death or permanent disability.
For purposes of these benefits, the following terms have the following meanings:
Change of Control |
(i) Any person (as such term is used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the Exchange Act) becomes the beneficial owner (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under said Act), directly or indirectly, of securities of Infinera representing fifty percent (50%) or more of the total voting power represented by Infineras then outstanding voting securities; (ii) the consummation of the sale or disposition by Infinera of all or substantially all of Infineras assets; (iii) the consummation of a merger or consolidation of Infinera with any other corporation, other than a merger or consolidation which would result in the voting securities of Infinera |
44
outstanding immediately prior thereto continuing to represent (either by remaining outstanding or by being converted into voting securities of the surviving entity or its parent) at least fifty percent (50%) of the total voting power represented by the voting securities of Infinera or such surviving entity or its parent outstanding immediately after such merger or consolidation; or (iv) a change in the composition of the Board occurring within a two (2) year period, as a result of which less than a majority of the directors are Incumbent Directors. Incumbent Directors means directors who either (A) are directors of Infinera as of the date hereof, or (B) are elected, or nominated for election, to the Board with the affirmative votes of at least a majority of the directors of Infinera at the time of such election or nomination (but will not include an individual whose election or nomination is in connection with an actual or threatened proxy contest relating to the election of directors to Infinera). |
Constructive Termination |
The executive officers resignation as a result of, and within three (3) months following the expiration of any company cure period (discussed below) following the occurrence of one or more of the following: (i) a material reduction in the executive officers job, duties or responsibilities in a manner that is substantially inconsistent with the position, duties or responsibilities held by the executive officer immediately before such reduction, (ii) a material reduction in the executive officers base salary (in other words, a reduction of more than five percent of executives base salary within the twelve-month period following a Change of Control), or (iii) a material change in the work location at which the executive officer is required to perform services for Infinera (in other words, a requirement that the executive officer relocate to a work location that is more than 50 miles from the executives work location in effect as of the date immediately prior to a Change in Control). The executive officer will not resign as the result of a Constructive Termination without first providing Infinera with written notice of the acts or omissions constituting the grounds for Constructive Termination within ninety (90) days of the initial existence of the grounds for Constructive Termination and a cure period of thirty (30) days following the date of such notice. |
Cause |
(i) The executive officers willful failure to substantially perform his or her duties and responsibilities to Infinera or deliberate violation of a company policy; (ii) the executive officers commission of any act of fraud, embezzlement, dishonesty or any other willful misconduct that has caused or is reasonably expected to result in material injury to Infinera; (iii) unauthorized use or disclosure by the executive officer of any proprietary information or trade secrets of Infinera or any other party to whom the executive officer owes an obligation of nondisclosure as a result of his or her relationship with Infinera; or (iv) the executive officers willful breach of any of his or her obligations under any written agreement or covenant with Infinera. The determination as to whether the executive officer is being terminated for Cause will be made in good faith by Infinera and will be final and binding on the executive officer. |
45
Fiscal 2016 Estimated Payments and Benefits Table
The amount of compensation and benefits payable to each of our NEOs in the event of a termination of employment by Infinera, a termination of employment following a Change of Control transaction (as defined above), or a termination of employment due to death or permanent disability has been estimated in the table below. The value of the outstanding equity award vesting acceleration was calculated based on the assumption that the termination event occurred on December 31, 2016, the last day of fiscal 2016. The closing price of our common stock as of the last trading day of fiscal 2016, was $8.49 per share, which was used as the value of our common stock in the calculations below. The value of the vesting acceleration was calculated by (i) multiplying the number of accelerated shares of common stock underlying unvested, in-the-money equity awards by $8.49 and (ii) subtracting the exercise price for the unvested stock options.
Potential Payments in Connection With: | ||||||||||||||
Name |
Type of Benefit |
Termination Under Severance Policy ($) |
Termination After a Change of Control ($) |
Termination Upon Death or Disability ($) |
||||||||||
Thomas J. Fallon |
Cash Severance | 972,462 | 1,296,616 | | ||||||||||
Vesting Acceleration(1) | | 3,254,650 | 3,254,650 | |||||||||||
Continued Coverage of Employee Benefits | 41,813 | 55,750 | | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total Benefits | 1,014,275 | 4,607,016 | 3,254,650 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Brad D. Feller |
Cash Severance | 399,385 | 599,078 | | ||||||||||
Vesting Acceleration(2) | | 1,436,797 | 1,436,797 | |||||||||||
Continued Coverage of Employee Benefits | 21,930 | 32,896 | | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total Benefits | 421,315 | 2,068,771 | 1,436,797 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
David F. Welch, Ph.D. |
Cash Severance | 499,231 | 748,847 | | ||||||||||
Vesting Acceleration(3) | | 2,799,000 | 2,799,000 | |||||||||||
Continued Coverage of Employee Benefits | 27,875 | 41,813 | | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total Benefits | 527,106 | 3,589,660 | 2,799,000 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Robert J. Jandro |
Cash Severance | 364,769 | 547,154 | | ||||||||||
Vesting Acceleration(4) | | 1,155,413 | 1,155,413 | |||||||||||
Continued Coverage of Employee Benefits | 15,963 | 23,944 | | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total Benefits | 380,732 | 1,726,511 | 1,155,413 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
James L. Laufman |
Cash Severance | 364,385 | 546,578 | | ||||||||||
Vesting Acceleration(5) | | 908,625 | 908,625 | |||||||||||
Continued Coverage of Employee Benefits | 21,930 | 32,896 | | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total Benefits | 386,315 | 1,488,099 | 908,625 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | The vesting of 383,351 shares of common stock would accelerate if Mr. Fallon was terminated without Cause, as a result of a Constructive Termination within 12 months following a Change of Control or upon death or permanent disability as of December 31, 2016. |
(2) | The vesting of 176,005 shares of common stock would accelerate if Mr. Feller was terminated without Cause, as a result of a Constructive Termination within 12 months following a Change of Control or upon death or permanent disability as of December 31, 2016. |
(3) | The vesting of 329,682 shares of common stock would accelerate if Dr. Welch was terminated without Cause, as a result of a Constructive Termination within 12 months following a Change of Control or upon death or permanent disability as of December 31, 2016. |
(4) | The vesting of 136,091 shares of common stock would accelerate if Mr. Jandro was terminated without Cause, as a result of a Constructive Termination within 12 months following a Change of Control or upon death or permanent disability as of December 31, 2016. |
(5) | The vesting of 107,023 shares of common stock would accelerate if Mr. Laufman was terminated without Cause, as a result of a Constructive Termination within 12 months following a Change of Control or upon death or permanent disability as of December 31, 2016. |
46
RISK ASSESSMENT OF COMPENSATION PRACTICES
During fiscal 2016, at the request of the Compensation Committee, a review of the risks associated with our organization-wide compensation policies and practices was conducted. This review was conducted by Compensia with input from our legal, finance and human resources departments. This assessment included:
| A review of the policies and practices relating to the components of our compensation programs and arrangements; |
| A review of incentive-based cash and equity compensation plans and arrangements; |
| The identification of compensation design features that could potentially encourage excessive or imprudent risk taking, and identification of business risks that these features could potentially encourage; and |
| Consideration of the presence or absence of controls, policies, plan features or other factors that mitigate potential risks. |
Although all compensation programs were considered, particular attention was paid to incentive-based plans and arrangements involving variable payouts, where an employee might be able to influence payout factors and compensation plans and arrangements involving our executive team. In substantially all cases, these compensation plans and arrangements are centrally designed and administered and, excluding sales incentive compensation, are substantially identical across function and geography. Equity incentive compensation was found to be based on a blend of financial objectives and TSR, which allows us to avoid an over-emphasis on shorter-term financial goals. In addition, the financial and operational objectives used to determine the performance measures for our incentive-based compensation plans and arrangements were found to be substantially derived from our annual operating plan, which is approved by the Board.
In addition, the assessment considered the controls and other mitigating factors that serve to offset elements of our compensation policies and practices that may introduce or encourage risk-taking, including:
| Oversight of major incentive compensation plans and arrangements and decision-making by the Compensation Committee, which, in most cases, retains the ability to adjust elements of incentive compensation in its discretion; |
| Internal controls over financial reporting and compensation practices regularly reviewed and/or tested by internal auditors and subject to testing as part of the annual independent integrated audit by our external auditors; |
| Audit Committee oversight and review of financial results and non-GAAP adjustments used in certain components of incentive compensation; |
| The existence of, and training relating to, corporate standards of business conduct and ethics; |
| Substantial alignment of compensation of and benefits for executive and non-executive, salaried employees; |
| A clawback policy pursuant to which the Compensation Committee has a one-year look-back provision and provides the authority to recoup up to 100% of any Excess Compensation; and |
| Stock ownership guidelines applicable to our Section 16 Officers to align their interests with those of our stockholders. |
Compensias review concluded that the risks associated with our compensation policies and practices were being effectively managed by Infinera. Based on this review, as well as our assessment of the factors described above, we have determined that the risks associated with our compensation policies and practices are not reasonably likely to result in a material adverse effect on Infinera. This risk assessment was presented to and reviewed by the Compensation Committee.
47
PROPOSAL 2APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT TO THE INFINERA CORPORATION 2016 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF SHARES AUTHORIZED FOR ISSUANCE THEREUNDER BY 6,400,000 SHARES
The Board believes that our future success depends on our ability to attract and retain talented employees and that the ability to grant equity awards is a necessary and powerful recruiting and retention tool for Infinera. The Board believes that equity awards motivate high levels of performance, more closely align the interests of employees and stockholders by giving employees an opportunity to hold an ownership stake in Infinera, and provide an effective means of recognizing employee contributions to the success of Infinera. At the Annual Meeting, we are requesting that stockholders approve an increase to the number of shares of our common stock (Shares) authorized for issuance under the 2016 Plan by 6,400,000 Shares.
The 2016 Plan has not been amended in any material way, other than this amendment, since our stockholders approved the 2016 Plan at our 2016 annual meeting of our stockholders. Upon recommendation of the Compensation Committee, the Board approved this amendment to the 2016 Plan on March 30, 2017, subject to the approval of our stockholders at the Annual Meeting.
As of April 1, 2017, there were 3,832,752 Shares available for issuance pursuant to awards that may be granted under the 2016 Plan, excluding Shares already subject to outstanding awards granted under our predecessor 2007 Plan that, if forfeited, would be added to the number of Shares reserved under the 2016 Plan. If the proposed amendment to the 2016 Plan to increase the Share reserve is not approved by our stockholders, the 2016 Plan will remain in effect without the amendment and awards will continue to be made under 2016 Plan to the extent Shares remain available. However, we may not be able to continue our equity incentive program in the future. This could preclude us from successfully attracting and retaining highly skilled employees. The Board and the Compensation Committee believe that the additional Shares under the increased Share reserve will enable us to continue to use the 2016 Plan to achieve our recruiting, retention and incentive goals and will be essential to our future success.
If our stockholders approve this amendment to the 2016 Plan, we currently anticipate that the Shares will be sufficient to meet our expected needs through the date of our 2018 annual meeting of our stockholders. In determining the number of Shares to be reserved for issuance under the 2016 Plan, the Compensation Committee and the Board considered the following:
| Historical Grant Practices. The Compensation Committee and the Board considered the historical amounts of equity awards that we granted in the past three years. In fiscal 2014, 2015 and 2016, we granted equity awards of 3.152 million, 2.534 million and 3.639 million Shares, respectively, or a total of approximately 9.325 million Shares over the three-year period. |
| Forecasted Grants. In determining the projected Share utilization, the Compensation Committee and the Board considered a forecast that included the following factors: (i) the Shares that would be available for grant under the 2016 Plan, if our stockholders approve this amendment to the 2016 Plan, which was 10,232,752 Shares (consisting of 3,832,752 Shares available for issuance under the 2016 Plan as of April 1, 2017, plus the 6,400,000 additional Shares pursuant to this amendment to the 2016 Plan, and excluding Shares already subject to outstanding awards granted under the 2007 Plan that, if forfeited, would be added to the number of Shares reserved under the 2016 Plan); (ii) the estimated number of Shares to be added to the 2016 Plan from forfeited awards under the 2007 Plan; and (iii) forecasted future grants, which are value-based, meaning that Share amounts granted will be determined based on a dollar value of the award to be granted to the participant and stock price of Infinera. Due to our value-based grant program, any significant changes in our stock price as compared to the stock price we assumed for forecasting purposes could cause our actual Share usage to deviate significantly from our anticipated Share usage. The Compensation Committee and the Board also took into account future headcount growth on projected Share utilization. |
| Proxy Advisory Firm Guidelines. Given our significant institutional stockholder base, the Compensation Committee and the Board considered proxy advisory firm guidelines. |
48
Outstanding Awards
The following table sets forth information regarding all outstanding stock options and unvested RSUs and PSUs under all of our equity plans (other than the 2007 ESPP) as of April 1, 2017. The last sales price of our common stock as reported on NASDAQ on March 31, 2017, was $10.23 per share.
Outstanding Options |
Weighted Average Exercise Price |
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (in years) |
Unvested PSUs / RSUs Outstanding |
Number of Shares Available for Grant under 2016 Plan | ||||
1,633,964 | $8.2765 | 2.70 | 9,187,197 | 3,832,752 |
Reasons for Voting for the Proposal
Our 2016 Plan has been designed consistent with best corporate governance practices.
| Administration. The 2016 Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board, which is comprised entirely of independent non-employee directors |
| Stockholder Approval is Required for Additional Shares. The 2016 Plan does not contain an annual evergreen provision but instead reserves a fixed maximum number of Shares for issuance. Stockholder approval is required to increase that number |
| Share Counting Provisions. Under the 2016 Plan, if an option or stock appreciation right expires or becomes unexercisable without having been exercised in full, or if Shares subject to other types of awards are forfeited or repurchased due to failure to vest, those Shares will become available for issuance again under the 2016 Plan. Shares used to pay the exercise or purchase price of an award will not become available for future grant under the 2016 Plan. Shares used to satisfy the tax withholding obligations for awards other than options and stock appreciation rights will become available for future grant under the 2016 Plan. With respect to stock appreciation rights settled in Shares, the gross number of Shares exercised under the stock appreciation right award will cease to be available under the 2016 Plan. In addition, to the extent that we pay out an award in cash rather than Shares, such cash payment will not reduce the number of Shares available for issuance under the 2016 Plan. No Shares purchased by us with proceeds received from the exercise of an option will become available for issuance under the 2016 Plan or the 2007 Plan. |
| Minimum Vesting Requirements. 95% of the Shares reserved for issuance under the 2016 Plan may be issued only through awards that cannot vest in less than one year from the date of grant unless the vesting of such awards is accelerated due to the participants death, disability, or retirement or upon a major capital change of Infinera (such as our change in control). |
| Repricing Prohibition. The 2016 Plan prohibits any program providing participants the opportunity to transfer outstanding awards to a financial institution or other person or entity selected by the administrator, exchange awards for awards of the same type, awards of a different type, and/or cash, or have the exercise price of awards repriced (i.e., increased or reduced). |
| Non-Employee Director Award Limits. Under the 2016 Plan, in any fiscal year, a non-employee director may be granted equity awards (with an aggregate grant date fair value) and any other compensation (including cash retainers or fees) of no more than an aggregate of $750,000, increased to $1,000,000 in our fiscal year of his or her initial service. Any equity awards or other compensation provided to the director for his or her services as an employee or consultant (other than as a non-employee director) will be excluded for purposes of these limits. |
Our executive officers and directors have an interest in the approval of the 2016 Plan by our stockholders because they would be eligible to receive awards under the 2016 Plan.
Description of the 2016 Plan
The following paragraphs provide a summary of the principal features of the 2016 Plan and its operation. However, this summary is not a complete description of all of the provisions of the 2016 Plan and is qualified in its entirety by the specific language of the 2016 Plan. A copy of the 2016 Plan is provided as Appendix B to this Proxy Statement.
49
Purposes. The purposes of the 2016 Plan are to attract and retain the best available personnel for positions of substantial responsibility; to provide additional incentive to employees, directors, and consultants; and to promote the success of our business. These incentives will be provided through the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, RSUs, performance units, and performance shares as the administrator of the 2016 Plan may determine.
Authorized Shares. Subject to the adjustment provisions contained in the 2016 Plan, the maximum number of Shares that may be issued pursuant to awards under the 2016 Plan is equal to the sum of (1) 7,500,000 Shares plus (2) Shares subject to awards granted under the 2007 Plan that after May 12, 2016, expire, are forfeited or otherwise terminate, or are repurchased by us due to failure to vest (provided that the maximum number of Shares that may be added to the 2016 Plan with respect to awards granted under the 2007 Plan pursuant to this clause (2) above is 7,700,000 Shares). Our stockholders are being asked to approve an increase of 6,400,000 Shares in the maximum number of Shares that may be issued pursuant to awards under the 2016 Plan. Thus, if our stockholders approve this increase, the maximum number of Shares that may be issued pursuant to awards under the 2016 Plan will be increased to 13,900,000 Shares, plus the number of Shares described in clause (2) above.
Shares may be authorized, but unissued, or reacquired Shares. If an option or stock appreciation right expires or becomes unexercisable without having been exercised in full, or if Shares subject to other types of awards are forfeited to or repurchased by us due to failure to vest, those Shares will become available for issuance again under the 2016 Plan. Shares used to pay the exercise or purchase price of an award will cease to be available for future grant under the 2016 Plan. Shares used to satisfy the tax withholding obligations related to an award, except with respect to options and stock appreciation rights, will become available for future grant under the 2016 Plan. With respect to stock appreciation rights settled in Shares, the gross number of Shares exercised under the stock appreciation right award will cease to be available under the 2016 Plan. In addition, to the extent that we pay out an award in cash rather than Shares, such cash payment will not reduce the number of Shares available for issuance under the 2016 Plan. No Shares purchased by us with proceeds received from the exercise of an option will become available for issuance under the 2016 Plan or the 2007 Plan.
Plan Administration. The Compensation Committee (or other committee appointed by the Board) administers the 2016 Plan. With respect to awards granted or to be granted to certain officers and key employees intended to be an exempt transaction under Rule 16b-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Rule 16b-3), the members of the committee administering the 2016 Plan with respect to those awards must qualify as non-employee directors under Rule 16b-3 will administer the 2016 Plan with respect to such awards. In the case of awards intended to qualify as performance-based compensation within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code, the committee administering the 2016 Plan with respect to those awards will consist of two or more outside directors within the meaning of Section 162(m).
Subject to the provisions of the 2016 Plan, the administrator will have the power to determine the award recipients and the terms of the awards, including the exercise price, the number of Shares subject to each such award, the exercisability of the awards, and the form of consideration, if any, payable upon exercise. The administrator also will have the authority to amend existing awards, to construe and interpret the 2016 Plan and awards granted under the 2016 Plan, to establish rules and regulations, including sub-plans for satisfying, or qualifying for favorable tax treatment under, applicable laws in jurisdictions outside of the United States, and to make all other determinations necessary or advisable for administering the 2016 Plan.
No Repricing. The 2016 Plan prohibits any program providing participants the opportunity to transfer outstanding awards to a financial institution or other person or entity selected by the administrator, exchange awards for awards of the same type, awards of a different type, and/or cash, or have the exercise price of awards repriced (i.e., increased or reduced).
Vesting Requirements. 95% of the Shares reserved for issuance under the 2016 Plan may be issued only through awards that cannot vest in less than one year from the date of grant unless the vesting of such awards is accelerated due to the participants death, disability, or retirement or upon a major capital change of Infinera (such as our change in control).
Eligibility. We will be able to grant all types of awards under the 2016 Plan to our employees, consultants, and non-employee directors and employees and consultants of our parent or subsidiary corporations. We will be able
50
to grant incentive stock options under the 2016 Plan only to individuals who, as of the time of grant, are employees of ours or of any parent or subsidiary corporation of ours. As of April 1, 2017, we had six non-employee directors, and approximately 2,245 employees (including five named executive officers) and 34 consultants.
Non-Employee Director Award Limits. The 2016 Plan provides that all non-employee directors will be eligible to receive all types of awards (except for incentive stock options) under the 2016 Plan. However, in any fiscal year, a non-employee director may be granted equity awards (with an aggregate grant date fair value) and any other compensation (including cash retainers or fees) of no more than an aggregate of $750,000, increased to $1,000,000 in our fiscal year of his or her initial service. Any equity awards or other compensation provided to the director for his or her services as an employee or consultant (other than as a non-employee director) will be excluded for purposes of these limits.
Certain Other Limits. In any fiscal year in which Infinera is publicly held and Section 162(m) applies to our employees who would be considered covered employees under Section 162(m), subject to any adjustment provisions contained in the 2016 Plan, the maximum aggregate number of Shares covering equity awards that a participant may receive is:
| With respect to stock options, 1,500,000 Shares, plus an additional 1,500,000 Shares in connection with his or her initial service as an employee; |
| With respect to stock appreciation rights, 1,500,000 Shares, plus an additional 1,500,000 Shares in connection with his or her initial service as an employee; |
| With respect to restricted stock, 1,500,000 Shares, plus an additional 1,500,000 Shares in connection with his or her initial service as an employee; |
| With respect to RSUs, 1,500,000 Shares, plus an additional 1,500,000 Shares in connection with his or her initial service as an employee; and |
| With respect to performance shares, 1,500,000 Shares, plus an additional 1,500,000 Shares in connection with his or her initial service as an employee. |
In addition, for each such fiscal year, the maximum aggregate grant date value of performance units that a participant may receive is $7,500,000.
Stock Options. We will be able to grant stock options under the 2016 Plan. Each option will be evidenced by an award agreement that specifies the exercise price, the term of the option, forms of consideration for exercise, and such other terms and conditions as the administrator determines, subject to the terms of the 2016 Plan. The exercise price of options granted under the 2016 Plan must be at least equal to the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant, except in special, limited circumstances as set forth in the 2016 Plan. The maximum term of an option will be specified in an award agreement, provided that an incentive stock option must have a term not exceeding 10 years. However, with respect to any participant who owns more than 10% of the voting power of all classes of outstanding stock of ours or of any parent or subsidiary of ours, the term must not exceed five years and the per share exercise price must equal at least 110% of the fair market value of a Share on the grant date. Generally, the fair market value of our common stock is the closing sales price on the relevant date as quoted on The NASDAQ Stock Market. Options will be exercisable at such times and under such conditions as determined by the administrator and as set forth in the applicable award agreement.
Stock Appreciation Rights. We will be able to grant stock appreciation rights under the 2016 Plan. Stock appreciation rights allow the recipient to receive the appreciation in the fair market value of our common stock between the exercise date and the date of grant. Each stock appreciation right will be evidenced by an award agreement that specifies the exercise price, the term of the stock appreciation right, and other terms and conditions as determined by the administrator, subject to the terms of the 2016 Plan. The per Share exercise price for the Shares to be issued pursuant to the exercise of a stock appreciation right will be no less than 100% of the fair market value per Share on the date of grant. Stock appreciation rights will be exercisable at such times and under such conditions as determined by the administrator and set forth in the applicable award agreement. At the discretion of the administrator, the payment upon exercise of a stock appreciation right may be paid in cash, Shares, or a combination of both.
51
Restricted Stock. We will be able to grant restricted stock under the 2016 Plan. Restricted stock awards are grants of Shares that are subject to various restrictions, including restrictions on transferability and forfeiture provisions. Each restricted stock award granted will be evidenced by an award agreement specifying the number of Shares subject to the award, any period of restriction, and other terms and conditions of the award, as determined by the administrator, subject to the terms of the 2016 Plan.
Restricted stock awards may (but are not required to) be subject to vesting conditions, as the administrator specifies (subject to the minimum vesting requirements), and the Shares acquired may not be transferred by the participant until the vesting conditions (if any) are satisfied. The administrator, in its sole discretion, may accelerate the time at which any restrictions will lapse or be removed. Recipients of restricted stock awards generally will have voting rights and rights to dividends and other distributions with respect to such Shares upon grant without regard to vesting, unless the administrator provides otherwise. Such dividends and other distributions, if any, will be subject to the same restrictions as the Shares of restricted stock on which they were paid. Unless otherwise determined by the administrator, a participant will forfeit any Shares of restricted stock as to which the restrictions have not lapsed prior to the participants termination of service.
Restricted Stock Units. We will be able to grant RSUs under the 2016 Plan. Each RSU granted is a bookkeeping entry representing an amount equal to the fair market value of one Share. Each RSU unit award will be evidenced by an award agreement that specifies the number of RSUs subject to the award, vesting criteria (which may include accomplishing specified performance criteria or continued service to us), form of payout, and other terms and conditions of the award, as determined by the administrator, subject to the terms of the 2016 Plan. RSUs result in a payment to a participant if the performance goals or other vesting criteria are achieved or the awards otherwise vest. The administrator, in its sole discretion, may accelerate the time at which any restrictions will lapse or be removed. The administrator determines in its sole discretion whether an award will be settled in stock, cash, or a combination of both.
Performance Units and Performance Shares. We will be able to grant performance units and performance shares under the 2016 Plan. Performance units and performance shares are awards that will result in a payment to a participant only if performance goals established by the administrator are achieved or the awards otherwise vest. Each award of performance units or performance shares will be evidenced by an award agreement specifying the number of units or shares (as applicable), the vesting conditions, the performance period, and other terms and conditions of the award, as determined by the administrator, subject to the terms and conditions of the 2016 Plan. On or before the date of grant, the administrator will establish an initial dollar value for each performance unit. Each performance share will have an initial value equal to the fair market value of a Share on the date of grant. The administrator in its discretion will establish performance goals or other vesting criteria (which may include continued service), which, depending on the extent to which they are met, will determine the number and/or the value of performance units and performance shares to be paid out. After the grant of performance units or performance shares, the administrator, in its sole discretion, may reduce or waive any performance objectives or other vesting provisions for such performance units or performance shares. The administrator, in its sole discretion, may pay earned performance units or performance shares in the form of cash, in Shares, or in some combination of both.
Performance Goals. Awards granted under the 2016 Plan that are intended to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) will be granted in accordance with additional terms set forth in the 2016 Plan.
The administrator in its discretion may make performance goals applicable to any award granted in its discretion, including but not limited to one or more of the performance goals listed below. If the administrator desires that an award of restricted stock, RSUs, performance shares or performance units under the 2016 Plan intended to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m), then the award may be made subject to the attainment of performance goal(s) relating to one or more business criteria within the meaning of Section 162(m) and may provide for a targeted level or levels of achievement using one or more of the following measures: revenue; gross margin; operating margin; operating income; pre-tax profit; earnings before stock-based compensation expense, interest, taxes and depreciation and amortization; earnings before interest, taxes and depreciation and amortization; earnings before interest and taxes; net income; expenses; new product development; stock price; earnings per share; return on stockholder equity; return on capital; return on net assets; economic value added; market share; customer service; customer satisfaction; sales; total stockholder return; free
52
cash flow; net operating income; operating cash flow; return on investment; employee satisfaction; employee retention; balance of cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities; product development; research and development expenses; completion of an identified special project; completion of a joint venture or other corporate transaction; inventory balance; or inventory turnover ratio.
The performance goal(s) may differ from participant to participant and from award to award. Any criteria used may be measured (as applicable), in absolute or relative terms, in combination with another performance goal or goals, on a per-share or per-capita basis, against the performance of the company as a whole or a segment of the company, and/or on a pre-tax or after-tax basis. Prior to the latest date that would meet the requirements under Section 162(m), the administrator will determine whether any significant elements or items will be included or excluded from the calculation of performance goals with respect to any award recipient. Except as so determined otherwise by the administrator, performance goals will be calculated in accordance with our financial statements, generally accepted accounting principles, or under a methodology established by the administrator prior to the issuance of the award.
Notwithstanding any other terms of the 2016 Plan, if we intend an award granted to a participant to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m), then in determining the amounts earned by a participant, the administrator may reduce or eliminate (but not increase) the amount payable at a given level of performance to take into account additional factors that the administrator deems relevant to the assessment of individual or corporate performance for the performance period. A participant may receive payment under such an award only if the performance goals for the performance period are achieved (unless otherwise permitted by Section 162(m) and determined by the administrator).
Non-Transferability of Awards. Unless the administrator provides otherwise, the 2016 Plan generally will not allow for the transfer of awards, and only the recipient of an award may exercise an award during his or her lifetime.
Certain Adjustments. In the event of any dividend or other distribution (whether in the form of cash, Shares, other securities or other property), recapitalization, stock split, reverse stock split, reorganization, reincorporation, reclassification, merger, consolidation, split-up, spin-off, combination, repurchase, or exchange of Shares or our other securities, or other change in our corporate structure affecting Shares, then in order to prevent diminution or enlargement of the benefits or potential benefits available under the 2016 Plan, the administrator will adjust the number and class of shares that may be delivered under the 2016 Plan and/or the number, class and price of shares covered by each outstanding award, and the numerical share limits set forth in the 2016 Plan. In the event of our proposed liquidation or dissolution, the administrator will notify participants as soon as practicable and all awards will terminate immediately prior to the completion of such proposed transaction.
Merger or Change in Control. The 2016 Plan provides that in the event of a merger or change in control, as defined in the 2016 Plan, each outstanding award will be treated as the administrator determines, including that each award be assumed or substituted by the successor corporation or its parent or subsidiary for an equivalent award for each outstanding award. The administrator will not be required to treat all awards similarly. If there is no assumption or substitution of outstanding awards, the awards will fully vest, all restrictions will lapse, all performance goals or other vesting criteria will be deemed achieved at 100% of target levels, and the awards will become fully exercisable. In addition, if an option or stock appreciation right is not assumed or substituted in the event of a change in control, the administrator will notify the participant that such award will be exercisable for a specified period prior to the transaction, and such award will terminate upon the expiration of such period.
Plan Amendment; Termination. The administrator has the authority to amend, suspend, or terminate the 2016 Plan provided such action does not impair the existing rights of any participant unless mutually agreed in writing. The 2016 Plan will terminate automatically in 2026, unless we terminate it sooner.
Number of Awards Granted to Employees and Directors
The number of awards that an employee, director, or consultant may receive under the 2016 Plan is in the discretion of the administrator and therefore cannot be determined in advance. The following table sets forth the aggregate number of RSUs and PSUs (at target) granted under the 2007 Plan and the 2016 Plan during fiscal
53
2016 to each of our NEOs; our NEOs, as a group; directors who are not executive officers, as a group; and all employees who are not executive officers, as a group. We ceased granting awards under the 2007 Plan after stockholders approved the 2016 Plan on May 12, 2016. There were no stock options granted to any employees (including our NEOs) or directors in fiscal 2016.
Name of Individual or Identity of Group and Principal Position |
Number of RSUs and PSUs Granted (#) |
Dollar Value of Award(s) ($)(1) |
||||||
Thomas J. Fallon |
222,840 | 3,300,134 | ||||||
Chief Executive Officer |
||||||||
Brad D. Feller |
65,960 | 981,030 | ||||||
Chief Financial Officer |
||||||||
David F. Welch, Ph.D. |
222,840 | 3,300,134 | ||||||
President |
||||||||
Robert J. Jandro |
64,020 | 952,176 | ||||||
Senior Vice President, Worldwide Sales |
||||||||
James L. Laufman |
59,720 | 888,222 | ||||||
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary |
||||||||
All current executive officers as a group |
635,380 | 9,421,696 | ||||||
All current directors who are not executive officers as a group |
89,981 | 1,150,195 | ||||||
All employees (excluding executive officers as a group) |
2,904,685 | 40,207,056 |
(1) | For RSUs, represents the aggregate grant date fair value of each equity award computed in accordance with ASC 718. For PSUs, represents the aggregate grant date fair value of each equity award at the target payout level computed in accordance with ASC 718. See Notes 2 and 14 of the notes to our consolidated financial statements contained in our 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on February 23, 2017 for a discussion of all assumptions made by us in determining the ASC 718 values of equity awards. |
U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences
The following paragraphs are a summary of the general federal income tax consequences to U.S. taxpayers and Infinera of awards granted under the 2016 Plan. Tax consequences for any particular individual may be different.
Incentive Stock Options. A participant recognizes no taxable income as the result of the grant or exercise of an incentive stock option qualifying under Section 422 of the Code (unless the participant is subject to the alternative minimum tax). If the participant exercises the option and then later sells or otherwise disposes of the Shares acquired through the exercise of the option after both the two-year anniversary of the grant date and the one-year anniversary of the exercise date, the difference between the sale price and the exercise price will be taxed as capital gain or loss. If the participant exercises the option and then later sells or otherwise disposes of the Shares on or before the two- or one-year anniversaries described above (a disqualifying disposition), he or she generally will have ordinary income at the time of the sale equal to the fair market value of the Shares on the exercise date (or the sale price, if less) minus the exercise price of the option.
Nonstatutory Stock Options. A participant generally recognizes no taxable income on the date of grant of a nonstatutory stock option with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the underlying stock on the date of grant. Upon the exercise of a nonstatutory stock option, the participant generally will recognize ordinary income equal to the excess of the fair market value of the Shares on the exercise date over the exercise price of the option. If the participant is an employee, such ordinary income generally is subject to withholding of income and employment taxes. Upon the sale of Shares acquired through the exercise of a nonstatutory stock option, any subsequent gain or loss (generally based on the difference between the sale price and the fair market value on the exercise date) will be treated as long-term or short-term capital gain or loss, depending on how long the Shares were held by the participant.
Stock Appreciation Rights. A participant generally recognizes no taxable income on the date of grant of a stock appreciation right with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the underlying stock on the date of
54
grant. Upon exercise of the stock appreciation right, the participant generally will be required to include as ordinary income an amount equal to the sum of the amount of any cash received and the fair market value of any Shares received upon the exercise. If the participant is an employee, such ordinary income generally is subject to withholding of income and employment taxes. Upon the sale of Shares acquired by an exercise of the stock appreciation right, any gain or loss (generally based on the difference between the sale price and the fair market value on the exercise date) will be treated as long-term or short-term capital gain or loss, depending on how long the Shares were held by the participant.
Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units, Performance Units and Performance Shares. A participant generally will not have taxable income at the time an award of restricted stock, RSUs, performance shares, or performance units is granted. Instead, he or she generally will recognize ordinary income in the first taxable year in which his or her interest in the Shares underlying the award becomes either (i) freely transferable, or (ii) no longer subject to substantial risk of forfeiture. If the participant is an employee, such ordinary income generally is subject to withholding of income and employment taxes. However, the recipient of a restricted stock award may elect to recognize income at the time he or she receives the award in an amount equal to the fair market value of the Shares underlying the award (less any cash paid for the Shares) on the date the award is granted.
Section 409A. Section 409A of the Code (Section 409A) provides certain requirements for non-qualified deferred compensation arrangements with respect to an individuals deferral and distribution elections and permissible distribution events. Awards granted under the 2016 Plan with a deferral feature will be subject to the requirements of Section 409A. If an award is subject to and fails to satisfy the requirements of Section 409A, the recipient of that award may recognize ordinary income on the amounts deferred under the award, to the extent vested, which may be prior to when the compensation is actually or constructively received. Also, if an award that is subject to Section 409A fails to comply with Section 409As provisions, Section 409A imposes an additional 20% tax on compensation recognized as ordinary income, as well as interest on such deferred compensation.
Tax Effect for Infinera. We generally will be entitled to a tax deduction in connection with an award under the 2016 Plan in an amount equal to the ordinary income realized by a participant and at the time the participant recognizes such income (for example, the exercise of a nonqualified stock option). However, special rules limit the deductibility of compensation paid to our CEO and other covered employees as determined under Section 162(m) of the Code and applicable guidance. Under Section 162(m), the annual compensation paid to any of these specified executives will be deductible only to the extent that it does not exceed $1,000,000. However, we can preserve the deductibility of certain compensation in excess of $1,000,000 if the conditions of Section 162(m) are met. These conditions include (among others) stockholder approval of the 2016 Plan and its material terms, setting certain limits on the number of Shares subject to awards and, for awards other than options and stock appreciation rights, establishing performance criteria that must be met before the award actually will vest or be paid. The 2016 Plan has been designed to permit (but not require) the administrator to grant awards that are intended to qualify as performance-based for purposes of satisfying the conditions of Section 162(m).
THE FOREGOING IS ONLY A SUMMARY OF THE TAX EFFECT OF FEDERAL INCOME TAXATION UPON PARTICIPANTS AND INFINERA WITH RESPECT TO THE GRANT AND VESTING OR EXERCISE OF AWARDS UNDER THE 2016 PLAN. IT DOES NOT PURPORT TO BE COMPLETE, AND DOES NOT DISCUSS THE TAX CONSEQUENCES OF A SERVICE PROVIDERS DEATH OR THE PROVISIONS OF THE INCOME TAX LAWS OF ANY MUNICIPALITY, STATE, OR NON-U.S. COUNTRY TO WHICH THE SERVICE PROVIDER MAY BE SUBJECT.
Summary
The Board believes that it is in the best interests of our company and our stockholders to continue to provide employees, consultants and directors with the opportunity to acquire an ownership interest in Infinera through the grant of equity awards under the 2016 Plan and thereby encourage them to remain in our service and more closely align their interests with those of our stockholders.
55
Vote Required
Approval of Proposal 2 requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on this proposal. Abstentions will have the same effect as an AGAINST vote. Broker non-votes are not deemed to be votes cast and, therefore, are not included in the tabulation of the voting results on this proposal and will not affect the outcome of the vote.
Proposal 2Recommendation of the Board
The Board unanimously recommends a vote FOR the approval of the amendment to the 2016 Plan to increase the number of Shares authorized thereunder by 6,400,000 Shares.
56
PROPOSAL 3ADVISORY APPROVAL OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, or the Dodd-Frank Act, enables our stockholders to vote to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our NEOs as disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and the tabular disclosures of this Proxy Statement. This proposal, commonly known as a say-on-pay proposal, provides our stockholders with the opportunity to express their views on the compensation of our NEOs.
As described in the section entitled Compensation Discussion and Analysis, we believe that the skill, talent, judgment and dedication of our executive officers are critical factors affecting the long-term value of Infinera. The goals of our executive compensation programs are to fairly compensate our executives, attract and retain highly-qualified executives able to contribute to our long-term success, encourage performance consistent with clearly defined corporate goals and align our executives long-term interests with those of our stockholders. The specific goals that our current executive compensation programs reward are focused on financial and operational objectives, including specific revenue and non-GAAP operating income targets as well as important operational goals important to the short-term and long-term growth of Infinera. Please read the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement beginning on page 22 for additional details about our executive compensation programs, including information about the fiscal 2016 compensation of our NEOs.
The Board is asking our stockholders to indicate their support for the compensation of our NEOs as described in this Proxy Statement. This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our NEOs and the philosophy, policies, practices and objectives described in this Proxy Statement. Accordingly, the Board recommends that our stockholders vote FOR the following resolution at the Annual Meeting:
RESOLVED: That the stockholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the named executive officers, as disclosed in the Proxy Statement for the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables, and the accompanying footnotes and narrative disclosures.
As an advisory vote, this say-on-pay proposal is not binding upon Infinera, the Board or the Compensation Committee. However, Infinera, the Board and the Compensation Committee, which are responsible for overseeing, reviewing and administering our executive compensation programs, value the opinions expressed by our stockholders and will continue to consider our stockholders concerns in evaluating future compensation options for our NEOs.
Vote Required
Approval of Proposal 3 requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on this proposal. Abstentions will have the same effect as an AGAINST vote. Broker non-votes are not deemed to be votes cast and, therefore, are not included in the tabulation of the voting results on this proposal and will not affect the outcome of the vote.
Proposal 3Recommendation of the Board
The Board unanimously recommends a vote FOR the approval of the compensation of our NEOs, as disclosed in this Proxy Statement pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC.
57
PROPOSAL 4ADVISORY APPROVAL OF THE FREQUENCY OF STOCKHOLDER ADVISORY VOTES ON NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION
In accordance with the requirements of Section 14A of the Exchange Act and the related rules of the SEC, our stockholders have the opportunity to cast an advisory vote to approve the compensation of our NEOs as described in Proposal 3 above. This Proposal 4 affords stockholders the opportunity to cast an advisory vote on how often we should include a say-on-pay proposal in our proxy materials for future annual stockholder meetings or any special stockholder meeting for which we must include executive compensation information in the proxy statement for that meeting (a say-on-pay frequency proposal). Under this Proposal 4, stockholders may vote to have the say-on-pay vote every year, every two years, or every three years.
Stockholders may also abstain from voting on this Proposal 4. In considering your vote, you may wish to review the information presented in connection with Proposal 3 in this Proxy Statement, together with the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and the tabular disclosures of this Proxy Statement, which provide more detailed discussion of our executive compensation policies and programs.
After careful consideration of this Proposal 4, our Board has determined that an annual advisory vote on executive compensation is the most appropriate alternative for Infinera and, therefore, the Board recommends that you vote for a one-year interval for the advisory vote on executive compensation.
The Board believes that an advisory say-on-pay vote should be conducted every year so that stockholders may annually express their views on the effectiveness of our executive compensation policies and programs.
As an advisory vote, this Proposal 4 is not binding upon Infinera or the Board. The Board may determine that it is in the best interests of our stockholders and Infinera to hold an advisory vote on executive compensation more or less frequently than the option approved by our stockholders. It is expected that the next vote on a say-on-pay frequency proposal will occur at the 2023 annual meeting of stockholders.
Vote Required
The option of 1 YEAR, 2 YEARS or 3 YEARS that receives the highest number of votes cast by stockholders will be the frequency for the advisory vote on executive compensation that has been selected by our stockholders.
Proposal 4Recommendation of the Board
The Board unanimously recommends a vote for 1 YEAR as the frequency with which stockholders are provided an advisory vote on executive compensation, as disclosed pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC.
58
PROPOSAL 5RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Audit Committee of the Board has selected Ernst & Young LLP, independent registered public accounting firm, as our independent auditors for the fiscal year ending December 30, 2017 and has further directed that we submit the appointment of independent auditors for ratification by the stockholders at the Annual Meeting. Ernst & Young LLP has audited our financial statements since fiscal 2001. Representatives of Ernst & Young LLP are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting. They will have an opportunity to make a statement if they so desire and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.
Ratification of appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm is not required pursuant to our Bylaws, our other governing documents or law. However, we are submitting the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP to the stockholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate practice. If the stockholders fail to ratify the appointment, the Audit Committee will reconsider whether or not to retain that firm. Even if the appointment is ratified, the Audit Committee in its discretion may direct the appointment of different independent auditors at any time during the year if it determines that such change would be in the best interests of Infinera and its stockholders.
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms Fees
The following table sets forth the aggregate fees for audit, tax and other services provided by Ernst & Young LLP for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2016 and December 26, 2015. All of the services described in the following table were approved in conformity with the Audit Committees pre-approval processes and procedures.
2016 | 2015 | |||||||
Audit Fees |
$ | 2,321,000 | $ | 1,768,000 | ||||
Audit-Related Fees |
| 810,000 | ||||||
Tax Fees |
389,000 | 73,000 | ||||||
All Other Fees |
82,000 | 2,000 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total Fees |
$ | 2,792,000 | $ | 2,653,000 | ||||
|
|
|
|
Audit Fees
This category of the table above includes fees for the integrated audit of our annual consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting, review of the condensed consolidated financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and services that are normally provided by Ernst & Young LLP in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for those fiscal years. This category also includes statutory audits required by non-U.S. jurisdictions. The preparation of our audited consolidated financial statements includes compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the preparation by Ernst & Young LLP of a report expressing its opinion regarding the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting.
Audit-Related Fees
Audit-related services principally include due diligence in connection with acquisitions, accounting consultations, audits in connection with proposed or consummated acquisitions and information systems audits. Audit-related fees for fiscal 2015 include $0.8 million of fees related to procedures in connection with the acquisition of Transmode.
Tax Fees
This category of the table above includes fees for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning.
59
All Other Fees
This category of the table above principally includes support and advisory services provided by Ernst & Young LLP that are not included in the service categories reported above.
Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures
The Audit Committees policy is to pre-approve all audit and permissible non-audit services rendered by Ernst & Young LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee can pre-approve specified services in defined categories of audit services, audit-related services and tax services up to specified amounts, as part of the Audit Committees approval of the scope of the engagement of Ernst & Young LLP or on an individual case-by-case basis before Ernst & Young LLP is engaged to provide a service. The Audit Committee has determined that the rendering of the services other than audit services by Ernst & Young LLP is compatible with maintaining the principal accountants independence.
Vote Required
Approval of Proposal 5 requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on this proposal. Abstentions will have the same effect as an AGAINST vote. Broker non-votes are not deemed to be votes cast and, therefore, are not included in the tabulation of the voting results on this proposal and will not affect the outcome of the vote.
Proposal 5Recommendation of the Board
The Board unanimously recommends a vote FOR the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as Infineras independent registered public accounting firm for its fiscal year ending December 30, 2017.
60
The Audit Committee of the Board currently consists of the three non-employee directors named below. The Board annually reviews the NASDAQ listing standards definition of independence for Audit Committee members and has determined that each member of the Audit Committee meets that standard. The Board has also determined that Messrs. Gani and Milbury are each an Audit Committee Financial Expert as described in applicable rules and regulations of the SEC.
The principal purpose of the Audit Committee is to assist the Board in its general oversight of our accounting practices, system of internal controls, audit processes and financial reporting processes. The Audit Committee is responsible for appointing and retaining our independent auditor and approving the audit and non-audit services to be provided by our independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committees function is more fully described in its charter, which the Board has adopted and which the Audit Committee reviews on an annual basis. A copy of the Audit Committee charter is available on our website at www.infinera.com.
Our management is responsible for preparing our financial statements and ensuring they are complete and accurate and prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Ernst & Young LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, is responsible for performing an independent audit of our consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting.
The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016 with our management and Ernst & Young LLP. The Audit Committee has also discussed with Ernst & Young LLP the matters required to be discussed by Auditing Standard No. 1301, Communications with Audit Committees issued by Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). The Audit Committee also has received and reviewed the written disclosures and the letter from Ernst & Young LLP required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding Ernst & Young LLPs communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and has discussed with Ernst & Young LLP its independence from Infinera.
Based upon the review and discussions described above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the audited financial statements referred to above be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 for filing with the SEC.
Submitted by the members of the Audit Committee:
Paul J. Milbury (Chair)
Marcel Gani
Kambiz Y. Hooshmand
61
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
We have adopted a formal policy that our executive officers, directors, and principal stockholders, including their immediate family members and affiliates, are not permitted to enter into a related party transaction with us without the prior consent of the Audit Committee, or other independent members of the Board in the case it is inappropriate for the Audit Committee to review such transaction due to a conflict of interest. Any request for us to enter into a transaction with an executive officer, director, principal stockholder, or any of such persons immediate family members or affiliates, in which the amount involved exceeds $120,000 must first be presented to the Audit Committee for review, consideration and approval. All of our directors, executive officers and employees are required to report to the Audit Committee any such related party transaction. In approving or rejecting the proposed agreement, the Audit Committee shall consider the relevant facts and circumstances available and deemed relevant to the Audit Committee, including, but not limited to the risks, costs and benefits to us, the terms of the transaction, the availability of other sources for comparable services or products, and, if applicable, the impact on a directors independence. The Audit Committee shall approve only those agreements that, in light of known circumstances, are, or are not inconsistent with, our best interests, as the Audit Committee determines in the good faith exercise of its discretion.
In fiscal 2016, Infinera did not engage in any related party transactions.
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
The members of the Board, our executive officers and persons who hold more than 10% of our outstanding common stock are subject to the reporting requirements of Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act, which requires them to file reports with respect to their ownership of our common stock and certain transactions in our common stock. Based solely upon (i) the copies of Section 16(a) reports that we received from such persons for their fiscal 2016 transactions in our common stock and their common stock holdings and (ii) the written representations received from one or more of such persons, we believe that all reporting requirements under Section 16(a) were met in a timely manner during fiscal 2016.
62
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
The following table provides information as of December 31, 2016 with respect to the shares of our common stock that may be issued under our existing equity compensation plans.
Plan Category |
(a) Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights |
(b) Weighted Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights |
(c) Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in First Column) |
|||||||||
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders |
7,852,531 | (1) | $ | 8.30 | 11,760,364 | (2) | ||||||
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders |
| | | |||||||||
Total |
7,852,531 | 11,760,364 |
(1) | This amount includes the following: |
| 1,655,731 shares issuable upon the exercise of outstanding stock options granted under the 2000 Stock Plan and 2007 Plan. |
| 5,293,179 shares subject to RSUs granted under the 2007 Plan and 2016 Plan. Since these awards have no exercise price, they are not included in the weighted average exercise price calculation in column (b). |
| 903,621 shares issuable pursuant to outstanding stock awards that have been granted under the 2007 Plan, but not yet earned as of December 31, 2016. The number of shares, if any, to be issued pursuant to such outstanding awards will be determined based on certain performance metrics, as discussed above in the section entitled Fiscal 2016 CompensationLong-Term Incentive Compensation in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis. Since these awards have no exercise price, they are not included in the weighted average exercise price calculation in column (b). |
(2) | This amount includes 4,664,239 shares of common stock available for future issuances under the 2007 ESPP. |
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR 2018 ANNUAL MEETING
To be considered for inclusion in our Proxy Statement for the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the 2018 Annual Meeting), stockholder proposals must comply with our Bylaws and the requirements of Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act and be received by our Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices no later than December 14, 2017, or no later than 120 calendar days before the one-year anniversary of the date on which we first mailed our Proxy Statement or Notice to stockholders in connection with this years Annual Meeting.
To be raised at the 2018 Annual Meeting, stockholder proposals must comply with our Bylaws. Under our Bylaws, a stockholder must give timely notice thereof in proper written form to our Corporate Secretary of any business, including nominations of directors for the Board that the stockholder wishes to raise at our 2018 Annual Meeting. To be timely, the stockholder notice must be received by our Corporate Secretary no later than February 27, 2018 nor earlier than January 28, 2018, or no later than the 45th day nor earlier than the 75th day before the one-year anniversary of the date on which we first mailed our proxy materials or a notice of availability of proxy materials (whichever is earlier) to stockholders in connection with this years Annual Meeting. To be in proper written form, the stockholder notice must contain a brief description of such business and the reasons for conducting such business at the meeting, as well as certain other information as set forth in greater detail in our Bylaws. In connection with a stockholder nomination of a candidate for the Board, the stockholder notice must also include certain information as set forth in our Bylaws about both the nominee and the stockholder making the nomination. If you wish to bring a stockholder proposal or nominate a candidate for director, you are advised to review our Bylaws, which contain additional requirements about advance notice of stockholder proposals and director nominations. Our current Bylaws may be found on our website at www.infinera.com in the Corporate Governance section on our Investor Relations page.
63
Under Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act, if the date of the 2018 Annual Meeting changes by more than 30 days from the anniversary of this years Annual Meeting, to be included in our Proxy Statement, stockholder proposals must be received by us within a reasonable time before our solicitation is made.
Under our Bylaws, if the date of the 2018 Annual Meeting is advanced by more than 30 days prior to or delayed by more than 60 days after the one-year anniversary of the date of this years Annual Meeting, then, for notice by the stockholder to be timely, it must be received by our Corporate Secretary no earlier than the close of business on the 120th day prior to the 2018 Annual Meeting and no later than the close of business on the later of (i) the 90th day prior to the 2018 Annual Meeting, or (ii) the tenth day following the day on which disclosure in a press release reported by GlobeNewswire, Associated Press or a comparable national news service or in a document publicly filed by Infinera with the SEC pursuant to Section 13, 14 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of the date of the 2018 Annual Meeting is first made.
If we receive notice of a matter to come before the 2018 Annual Meeting that is not in accordance with the deadlines described above and as more fully set forth in our Bylaws and Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act, we will use our discretion in determining whether or not to bring such matter before the 2018 Annual Meeting. If such matter is brought before the 2018 Annual Meeting, then our proxy card for such meeting will confer upon our proxy holders discretionary authority to vote on such matter.
DELIVERY OF DOCUMENTS TO STOCKHOLDERS
SHARING THE SAME LAST NAME AND ADDRESS
To reduce the expense of delivering duplicate proxy materials to stockholders who may have more than one account holding our common stock, but sharing the same address, we have adopted a procedure, approved by the SEC, called householding. Under this procedure, stockholders who have the same last name and address, and who do not participate in electronic delivery of proxy materials, will receive only one copy of our Notice, and as applicable, any additional proxy materials that are delivered. This procedure reduces duplicate mailings and saves printing costs and postage fees, as well as natural resources. Stockholders who participate in householding will continue to have access to and utilize separate proxy voting instructions.
Once you have received notice from your broker that they will be householding communications to your address, householding will continue until you are notified otherwise or until you revoke your consent. If, at any time, you no longer wish to participate in householding and would prefer to receive a separate set of proxy materials or if you would like an additional copy of any of the proxy materials, please notify your broker or direct your written request to Infinera Corporation, 140 Caspian Court, Sunnyvale, California 94089, Attention: Corporate Secretary, or call (408) 572-5200. Stockholders who currently receive multiple copies of the Proxy Statement at their address and would like to request householding of their communications should contact their broker.
64
The Board knows of no other matters that will be presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting. If any other matters are properly brought before the Annual Meeting, it is the intention of the persons named in the accompanying proxy to vote on such matters in accordance with their best judgment.
By Order of the Board, | ||
/S/ JAMES L. LAUFMAN | ||
James L. Laufman | ||
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary |
Sunnyvale, California
April 12, 2017
65
APPENDIX AUNAUDITED RECONCILIATIONS FROM GAAP TO NON-GAAP
Infinera Corporation
Unaudited Reconciliations from GAAP to Non-GAAP
(In thousands)
Years Ended | ||||||||||||
December 31, 2016 |
December 26, 2015 |
December 27, 2014 |
||||||||||
Revenue |
$870,135 | $886,714 | $668,079 | |||||||||
Reconciliation of Gross Profit: |
||||||||||||
U.S. GAAP as reported |
$393,718 | $403,477 | $288,304 | |||||||||
Stock-based compensation |
6,463 | 6,090 | 5,607 | |||||||||
Acquisition-related deferred revenue adjustment |
400 | 1,326 | | |||||||||
Amortization of acquired intangible assets |
19,715 | 6,562 | | |||||||||
Acquisition-related inventory step-up expense |
| 6,710 | | |||||||||
Acquisition-related costs |
144 | 39 | | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Non-GAAP as adjusted |
$420,440 | $424,204 | $293,911 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Reconciliation of Gross Margin: |
||||||||||||
U.S. GAAP as reported |
45.2 | % | 45.5 | % | 43.2 | % | ||||||
Stock-based compensation |
0.7 | % | 0.7 | % | 0.8 | % | ||||||
Acquisition-related deferred revenue adjustment |
0.1 | % | 0.1 | % | | |||||||
Amortization of acquired intangible assets |
2.3 | % | 0.7 | % | | |||||||
Acquisition-related inventory step-up expense |
| 0.8 | % | | ||||||||
Acquisition-related costs |
| | | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Non-GAAP as adjusted |
48.3 | % | 47.8 | % | 44.0 | % | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Reconciliation of Operating Income (Loss): |
||||||||||||
U.S. GAAP as reported |
$ (25,774 | ) | $ 59,736 | $ 27,342 | ||||||||
Stock-based compensation |
40,533 | 32,580 | 28,394 | |||||||||
Acquisition-related deferred revenue adjustment |
400 | 1,326 | | |||||||||
Amortization of acquired intangible assets |
25,904 | 8,904 | | |||||||||
Acquisition-related inventory step-up expense |
| 6,710 | | |||||||||
Acquisition-related costs |
2,013 | 7,280 | | |||||||||
Acquired in-process research & development |
11,295 | | | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Non-GAAP as adjusted |
$ 54,371 | $116,536 | $ 55,736 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
The non-GAAP measures of gross profit, gross margin and operating income exclude non-cash stock-based compensation expenses, amortization and impairment of acquired intangible assets, acquisition-related costs and certain purchase accounting adjustments related to our acquisition of Transmode AB, which closed during the third quarter of fiscal 2015. We believe these adjustments are appropriate to enhance an overall understanding of our underlying financial performance and also our prospects for the future and are considered by management for the purpose of making operational decisions. In addition, these results are the primary indicators management uses as a basis for our planning and forecasting of future periods. The presentation of this additional information is not meant to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for gross profit, gross margin and operating income prepared in accordance with GAAP. Non-GAAP financial measures are not based on a comprehensive set of accounting rules or principles and are subject to limitations.
A-1
APPENDIX BAMENDED 2016 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
INFINERA CORPORATION
2016 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
(Effective as of May 12, 2016, as amended , 2017)
1. Purposes of the Plan. The purposes of this Plan are:
| to attract and retain the best available personnel for positions of substantial responsibility, |
| to provide additional incentive to Employees, Directors and Consultants, and |
| to promote the success of the Companys business. |
The Plan permits the grant of Incentive Stock Options, Nonstatutory Stock Options, Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units, Stock Appreciation Rights, Performance Units and Performance Shares.
2. Definitions. As used herein, the following definitions will apply:
(a) Administrator means the Board or any of its Committees as will be administering the Plan, in accordance with Section 4 of the Plan.
(b) Applicable Laws means the legal and regulatory requirements relating to the administration of equity-based awards, including but not limited to U.S. federal and state corporate laws, U.S. federal and state securities laws, the Code, any stock exchange or quotation system on which the Common Stock is listed or quoted and the applicable laws of any non-U.S. country or jurisdiction where Awards are, or will be, granted under the Plan.
(c) Award means, individually or collectively, a grant under the Plan of Options, Stock Appreciation Rights, Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units, Performance Units or Performance Shares.
(d) Award Agreement means the written or electronic agreement setting forth the terms and provisions applicable to each Award granted under the Plan. The Award Agreement is subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan.
(e) Board means the Board of Directors of the Company.
(f) Change in Control means the occurrence of any of the following events:
(i) A change in the ownership of the Company which occurs on the date that any one person, or more than one person acting as a group (Person), acquires ownership of the stock of the Company that, together with the stock held by such Person, constitutes more than fifty percent (50%) of the total voting power of the stock of the Company; provided, however, that for purposes of this subsection, (A) the acquisition of additional stock by any one Person, who is considered to own more than fifty percent (50%) of the total voting power of the stock of the Company will not be considered a Change in Control, and (B) if the stockholders of the Company immediately before the change in ownership continue to retain, immediately after the change in ownership, in substantially the same proportions as their ownership of shares of the Companys voting stock immediately prior to the change in ownership, the direct or indirect beneficial ownership of fifty percent (50%) or more of the total voting power of the shares of the Company or of the ultimate parent entity of the Company, such event will not be considered a Change in Control; or
(ii) A change in the effective control of the Company which occurs on the date that a majority of members of the Board is replaced during any twelve (12) month period by Directors whose appointment or election is not endorsed by a majority of the members of the Board prior to the date of the appointment or election. For purposes of this clause (ii), if any Person is considered to be in effective control of the Company, the acquisition of additional control of the Company by the same Person will not be considered a Change in Control; or
B-1
(iii) A change in the ownership of a substantial portion of the Companys assets which occurs on the date that any Person acquires (or has acquired during the twelve (12) month period ending on the date of the most recent acquisition by such person or persons) assets from the Company that have a total gross fair market value equal to or more than fifty percent (50%) of the total gross fair market value of all of the assets of the Company immediately prior to such acquisition or acquisitions. For purposes of this subsection (iii), gross fair market value means the value of the assets of the Company, or the value of the assets being disposed of, determined without regard to any liabilities associated with su