UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2013
¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 001-34857
GOLD RESOURCE CORPORATION
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its charter)
|
|
Colorado |
84-1473173 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
2886 Carriage Manor Point, Colorado Springs, Colorado 80906
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)
(303) 320-7708
(Registrant’s telephone number including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
Larger accelerated filer |
x |
Accelerated filer |
¨ |
|
|
|
|
Non-accelerated filer |
¨(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company |
¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 53,279,369 shares of common stock outstanding as of August 7, 2013.
1
GOLD RESOURCE CORPORATION
FORM 10-Q
Index
|
|
|
|
Page |
|
Part I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
|
|
Item 1. |
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2013 (unaudited) and December 31, 2012 |
3 |
|
2 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) |
6 |
Item 2 |
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
14 |
Item 3 |
22 |
|
Item 4 |
24 |
|
|
|
|
Part II - OTHER INFORMATION |
|
|
Item 1. |
24 |
|
Item 2. |
24 |
|
Item 6. |
24 |
|
26 |
References in this report to agreements to which Gold Resource Corporation is a party and the definition of certain terms from those agreements are not necessarily complete and are qualified by reference to the agreements. Readers should refer to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 and the exhibits listed therein.
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING EXPLORATION STAGE STATUS AND USE OF CERTAIN MINING TERMS
We are considered an “exploration stage” company under the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Industry Guide 7, Description of Property by Issuers Engaged or to be Engaged in Significant Mining Operations (“Guide 7”), because we do not have reserves as defined under Guide 7. Reserves are defined in Guide 7 as that part of a mineral deposit which can be economically and legally extracted or produced at the time of the reserve determination. The establishment of reserves under Guide 7 requires, among other things, certain spacing of exploratory drill holes to establish the required continuity of mineralization and the completion of a detailed cost or feasibility study. Since we have no reserves as defined in Guide 7, we have not exited the exploration stage and continue to report our financial information as an exploration stage entity as required under relevant accounting principles.
Since we have no reserves, we have and will continue to expense all mine development, mill and other mine facility construction costs, even though these expenditures are expected to have a future economic benefit in excess of one year. We also expense our asset retirement obligations. Companies that have reserves and have exited the exploration stage typically capitalize these costs, and subsequently amortize them on a units-of-production basis as reserves are mined, with the resulting depletion charge allocated to inventory, and then to cost of sales as the inventory is sold. As a result of these and other differences, our financial statements will not be comparable to the financial statements of mining companies that have established reserves and have exited the exploration stage.
We use certain terms in this report such as “production,” “mining operations,” and “development,” which are terms typically used by companies that have established reserves and have exited the exploration stage under Guide 7. We use these terms in our report since we believe they are necessary and helpful for the reader to understand our business and operations. However, we caution you that we do not have reserves and therefore have not exited the exploration stage as defined in Guide 7, and our use of the terminology described above is not intended to indicate that we have established reserves or have exited the exploration stage for purposes of Guide 7. Furthermore, since we do not have reserves, we cannot provide any indication or assurance as to how long we will likely continue mining activities at our mine site or whether such activities will be profitable.
2
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
GOLD RESOURCE CORPORATION |
||||
(An Exploration Stage Company) |
||||
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS |
||||
(U.S. dollars in thousands, except shares) |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2013 |
|
2012 |
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ |
30,414 |
$ |
35,780 |
Gold and silver bullion |
|
3,825 |
|
5,809 |
Accounts receivable |
|
2,714 |
|
6,349 |
Inventories |
|
7,116 |
|
7,533 |
Income tax receivable |
|
6,922 |
|
419 |
Deferred tax assets |
|
2,121 |
|
2,121 |
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
3,751 |
|
973 |
Total current assets |
|
56,863 |
|
58,984 |
Land and mineral rights |
|
227 |
|
227 |
Property and equipment - net |
|
17,973 |
|
14,050 |
Inventories |
|
797 |
|
809 |
Deferred tax assets |
|
31,559 |
|
31,559 |
Total assets |
$ |
107,419 |
$ |
105,629 |
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
$ |
5,070 |
$ |
3,013 |
Accrued expenses |
|
5,802 |
|
4,178 |
Capital lease obligations |
|
1,376 |
|
- |
IVA taxes payable |
|
2,244 |
|
2,673 |
Dividends payable |
|
1,598 |
|
3,161 |
Total current liabilities |
|
16,090 |
|
13,025 |
Capital lease obligations |
|
3,125 |
|
- |
Asset retirement obligation |
|
2,861 |
|
2,790 |
Total liabilities |
|
22,076 |
|
15,815 |
Shareholders' equity: |
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock - $0.001 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized: |
|
|
|
|
no shares issued and outstanding |
|
- |
|
- |
Common stock - $0.001 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized: |
|
|
|
|
53,615,767 and 53,015,767 shares issued and outstanding, respectively |
|
54 |
|
53 |
Additional paid-in capital |
|
92,362 |
|
102,674 |
(Deficit) accumulated during the exploration stage |
|
- |
|
(5,851) |
Treasury stock at cost, 336,398 shares |
|
(5,884) |
|
(5,884) |
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) - currency translation adjustment |
|
(1,189) |
|
(1,178) |
Total shareholders' equity |
|
85,343 |
|
89,814 |
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity |
$ |
107,419 |
$ |
105,629 |
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements. |
3
GOLD RESOURCE CORPORATION |
||||||||||
(An Exploration Stage Company) |
||||||||||
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS |
||||||||||
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 |
||||||||||
and for the period from Inception (August 24, 1998) to June 30, 2013 |
||||||||||
(U.S. dollars in thousands, except shares and per share amounts) |
||||||||||
(Unaudited) |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inception |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(August 24, 1998) |
|
Three months ended June 30, |
Six months ended June 30, |
|
to June 30, |
||||||
|
|
2013 |
|
2012 |
|
2013 |
|
2012 |
|
2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of metals concentrate, net |
$ |
26,660 |
$ |
30,700 |
$ |
68,971 |
$ |
67,364 |
$ |
320,681 |
Mine cost of sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production costs |
|
14,931 |
|
12,603 |
|
30,642 |
|
19,545 |
|
103,678 |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
557 |
|
152 |
|
1,093 |
|
384 |
|
3,098 |
Accretion |
|
28 |
|
19 |
|
57 |
|
40 |
|
288 |
Total mine cost of sales |
|
15,516 |
|
12,774 |
|
31,792 |
|
19,969 |
|
107,064 |
Mine gross profit |
|
11,144 |
|
17,926 |
|
37,179 |
|
47,395 |
|
213,617 |
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
3,457 |
|
3,400 |
|
7,842 |
|
5,989 |
|
52,710 |
Exploration expenses |
|
2,806 |
|
2,231 |
|
6,105 |
|
3,584 |
|
48,217 |
Construction and development |
|
5,649 |
|
4,117 |
|
11,654 |
|
8,098 |
|
103,125 |
Production start-up expense, net |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
209 |
Management contract expense |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
752 |
Total costs and expenses |
|
11,912 |
|
9,748 |
|
25,601 |
|
17,671 |
|
205,013 |
Operating (loss) income |
|
(768) |
|
8,178 |
|
11,578 |
|
29,724 |
|
8,604 |
Other (expense) income |
|
(1,862) |
|
692 |
|
(1,898) |
|
(1,297) |
|
(1,759) |
(Loss) income before income taxes |
|
(2,630) |
|
8,870 |
|
9,680 |
|
28,427 |
|
6,845 |
Provision for income taxes (benefit) |
|
(1,257) |
|
4,742 |
|
3,667 |
|
10,798 |
|
4,927 |
Net (loss) income before extraordinary item |
|
(1,373) |
|
4,128 |
|
6,013 |
|
17,629 |
|
1,918 |
Extraordinary items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flood loss, net of income tax benefit of $750 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
(1,756) |
Net (loss) income |
$ |
(1,373) |
$ |
4,128 |
$ |
6,013 |
$ |
17,629 |
$ |
162 |
Other comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation (loss) |
|
(45) |
|
(1,689) |
|
(11) |
|
(225) |
|
(1,189) |
Comprehensive (loss) income |
$ |
(1,418) |
$ |
2,439 |
$ |
6,002 |
$ |
17,404 |
$ |
(1,027) |
Net (loss) income per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic: |
$ |
(0.03) |
$ |
0.08 |
$ |
0.11 |
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
Diluted: |
$ |
(0.03) |
$ |
0.07 |
$ |
0.11 |
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
53,272,776 |
|
52,909,756 |
|
52,977,712 |
|
52,904,370 |
|
|
Diluted |
|
53,272,776 |
|
56,443,419 |
|
55,434,474 |
|
56,400,692 |
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements. |
4
GOLD RESOURCE CORPORATION |
||||||
(An Exploration Stage Company) |
||||||
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS |
||||||
for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 |
||||||
and for the period from Inception (August 24, 1998) to June 30, 2013 |
||||||
(U.S. dollars in thousands) |
||||||
(Unaudited) |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inception |
|
|
|
|
(August 24, 1998) |
||
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
to June 30, |
|||
|
|
2013 |
|
2012 |
|
2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
$ |
6,013 |
$ |
17,629 |
$ |
162 |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
from (used in) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
1,188 |
|
518 |
|
4,199 |
Accretion |
|
57 |
|
40 |
|
288 |
Asset retirement obligation |
|
- |
|
- |
|
2,565 |
Stock-based compensation |
|
3,690 |
|
4,659 |
|
26,341 |
Management fee paid in stock |
|
- |
|
- |
|
392 |
Related party payable paid in stock |
|
- |
|
- |
|
320 |
Unrealized foreign currency exchange loss (gain) |
|
217 |
|
705 |
|
(685) |
Impairment loss on gold and silver bullion |
|
1,743 |
|
329 |
|
2,114 |
Deferred tax assets |
|
- |
|
- |
|
(36,259) |
Other |
|
2 |
|
- |
|
33 |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
3,086 |
|
9,673 |
|
(3,854) |
Inventories |
|
363 |
|
(912) |
|
(8,292) |
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
(2,483) |
|
(58) |
|
(3,597) |
Accounts payable |
|
1,642 |
|
(3,655) |
|
4,295 |
Accrued expenses |
|
1,682 |
|
2,973 |
|
4,601 |
IVA taxes payable/receivable |
|
(370) |
|
89 |
|
4,352 |
Income taxes payable/receivable |
|
(6,081) |
|
(16,128) |
|
(4,604) |
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
10,749 |
|
15,862 |
|
(7,629) |
Cash flows from (used in) investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
(5,113) |
|
(2,863) |
|
(22,610) |
Purchases of gold and silver bullion |
|
(806) |
|
(4,183) |
|
(8,883) |
Proceeds from conversion of gold and silver bullion |
|
1,048 |
|
885 |
|
2,945 |
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
(4,871) |
|
(6,161) |
|
(28,548) |
Cash flows from (used in) financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales of common stock |
|
- |
|
- |
|
150,633 |
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
150 |
|
- |
|
578 |
Proceeds from debentures - founders |
|
- |
|
- |
|
50 |
Dividends paid |
|
(15,876) |
|
(16,929) |
|
(84,986) |
Treasury stock purchases |
|
- |
|
- |
|
(5,885) |
Proceeds from exploration funding agreement |
|
- |
|
- |
|
500 |
Proceeds from capital leases |
|
4,501 |
|
- |
|
4,501 |
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
(11,225) |
|
(16,929) |
|
65,391 |
Effect of exchange rates on cash and equivalents |
|
(19) |
|
46 |
|
1,200 |
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
(5,366) |
|
(7,182) |
|
30,414 |
Cash and equivalents at beginning of period |
|
35,780 |
|
51,960 |
|
- |
Cash and equivalents at end of period |
$ |
30,414 |
$ |
44,778 |
$ |
30,414 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Cash Flow Information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes paid |
$ |
9,823 |
$ |
28,392 |
$ |
42,843 |
Non-cash investing and financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion of funding into |
|
|
|
|
|
|
common stock |
$ |
- |
$ |
- |
$ |
500 |
Conversion of founders debentures into |
|
|
|
|
|
|
common stock |
$ |
- |
$ |
- |
$ |
50 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements. |
5
(An Exploration Stage Company)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2013
(Unaudited)
1. Nature of Operations and Basis of Presentation
Nature of Operations
Gold Resource Corporation (the “Company”) was organized under the laws of the State of Colorado on August 24, 1998. The Company is a producer of metal concentrates that contain gold, silver, copper, lead and zinc at its El Aguila Project in the southern state of Oaxaca, Mexico. The El Aguila Project includes the El Aguila open pit mine, which ceased operations in February 2011, and the La Arista underground mine, which is currently in operation. The Company is also performing exploration and evaluation work on its portfolio of base and precious metal exploration properties in Mexico and is evaluating other properties for possible acquisition in Turkey and elsewhere.
Basis of Presentation
Basis of Presentation: The unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements included herein are expressed in United States dollars and conform to United States generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) and applicable rules of the SEC regarding interim financial reporting. The unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned Mexican subsidiaries, which are Don David Gold Mexico S.A. de C.V. (“Don David Gold Mexico”) and Golden Trump Mexico S.A. de C.V (“Golden Trump Mexico”) and the Company’s wholly owned Turkish subsidiary, Gold Resource Madencilik Sanayi Ve Ticaret Limited Sirketi. Significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to SEC rules and regulations, although the Company believes that the disclosures included herein are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. These unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s consolidated financial statements and notes thereto contained in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012. Except as noted below, there have been no material changes to the footnotes from those accompanying the audited financial statements contained in the Company’s Form 10-K.
In management’s opinion, the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contained herein reflect all material normal and recurring adjustments that are necessary for the fair presentation of the Company’s financial position, results of operations, and cash flows on a basis consistent with that of its audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2012. However, the results of operations for the interim period ended June 30, 2013 may not be indicative of results of operations to be expected for the full fiscal year.
Use of Estimates: The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Management routinely makes judgments and estimates about the effects of matters that are inherently uncertain and bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Revenue Recognition: Sales of concentrates are recorded net of treatment and refining charges, plus final settlement and mark to market price adjustments. Treatment and refining charges represent payments or price adjustments that are fixed and applied on a per tonne, pound or ounce basis, and in some cases provide for an increase in charges based on increases in metal prices above a base price. Treatment and refining charges are estimated upon shipment of concentrates based on contractual terms, with adjustments made at final settlement. Adjustments at final settlement typically do not vary materially from estimates made upon shipment however mark to market price adjustments could vary materially based on the precious metals market. In addition, because a portion of the metals contained in concentrates are unrecoverable as a result of the smelting process, the Company’s revenues from sales of concentrates are also recorded net of allowances based on the quantity and value of these estimated unrecoverable metals. These allowances are negotiated with the buyer of the Company’s concentrates.
Production Costs: Production costs include labor and benefits, royalties, concentrate shipping costs, mining subcontractors, fuel and lubricants, legal and professional fees related to mine operations, stock-based compensation attributable to mine employees, materials and supplies, repairs and maintenance, explosives, housing and food, insurance, reagents, travel, medical services, security equipment, office rent, tools and other costs that support our mining operations.
6
Reclassifications: Certain amounts presented in prior periods have been reclassified to conform with the current period presentation.
Exploration Stage Company: The Company has not yet demonstrated the existence of proven or probable reserves at its El Aguila Project in Oaxaca, Mexico or any of its other properties under the criteria set forth by the SEC and is therefore considered an exploration stage company. As a result, and in accordance with U.S. GAAP for exploration stage companies, substantially all of our investment in mining properties to date, including construction of the mill, mine facilities and mine development expenditures, have been expensed as incurred, and will continue to be expensed as incurred until such time as mineralized material is classified as proven or probable reserves. Certain expenditures, such as for rolling stock or other general-purpose equipment, may be capitalized, subject to evaluation of the possible impairment of the asset. The Company will not exit the exploration stage unless and until it demonstrates the existence of proven or probable reserves that meet SEC guidelines. See the cautionary Note at the beginning of this report for other information regarding our status as an exploration stage Company.
2. Fair Value Measurement
The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivable (which include provisionally priced sales) as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012. The following tables summarize the Company’s financial instruments required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012. The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivable approximated their fair values at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 due to their short maturities.
|
|
Fair Value as of June 30, 2013 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Total |
|
Balance Sheet Classification |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
||||||
Receivables related to unsettled invoices (1) |
$ |
- |
$ |
2,714 |
$ |
- |
$ |
2,714 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
Fair Value as of December 31, 2012 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Total |
|
Balance Sheet Classification |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
||||||
Receivables related to unsettled invoices (1) |
$ |
- |
$ |
6,349 |
$ |
- |
$ |
6,349 |
|
Accounts receivable |
(1) Certain concentrate sales contracts provide for provisional pricing as specified in such contracts. These sales contain an embedded derivative related to the provisional pricing mechanism which is bifurcated and accounted for as a derivative. At the end of each reporting period, the Company records an adjustment to sales to mark-to-market outstanding provisional invoices. Because these provisionally priced sales have not yet settled, the mark-to-market adjustment related to these invoices is included in accounts receivable as of each reporting date. The receivable is the sales contract with no quoted market price, whereas the underlying metal values (inputs) are directly observable for the full amount of the receivable (Level2).
Gains and losses related to changes in the fair value of these financial instruments were included in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively, in the following table:
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
||||
|
Type |
|
2013 |
|
2012 |
|
2013 |
|
2012 |
|
Statement of Operations Classification |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
||||
Receivables related to unsettled invoices on provisionally priced sales (1) |
Derivative (loss) |
$ |
(2,098) |
$ |
- |
$ |
(4,352) |
$ |
- |
|
Sales of metals concentrate, net |
(1) These sales contain an embedded derivative related to the provisional pricing mechanism which is bifurcated and accounted for as a derivative. At the end of each reporting period, the Company records an adjustment to sales to mark-to-market outstanding provisional invoices. Because these provisionally priced sales have not yet settled, the mark-to-market adjustment related to these invoices is included in sales of metals concentrate, net as of each reporting date.
7
3. Gold and Silver Bullion
The Company periodically purchases gold and silver bullion on the open market for investment purposes and to use in its dividend exchange program whereby shareholders may exchange their cash dividend for gold and silver bullion. The Company’s investment in gold and silver bullion is carried at cost and evaluated for impairment at relevant financial reporting dates in accordance with ASC 330-10-45-15 (a).
During the six months ended June 30, 2013, the Company purchased approximately 507 ounces of gold and 1,005 ounces of silver at market prices for a total cost of $0.8 million. During the six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company purchased approximately 1,372 ounces of gold and 58,011 ounces of silver at market prices for a total cost of $4.2 million. During the six months ended June 30, 2013, approximately 562 ounces of gold and 2,242 ounces of silver were converted into gold and silver bullion and distributed under the Company’s gold and silver bullion dividend exchange program, resulting in a realized loss of $0.1 million in that period. During the six months ended June 30, 2012, approximately 431 ounces of gold and 3,054 ounces of silver were converted into gold and silver bullion and distributed under this dividend program, resulting in a realized loss of $0.1 million in that period.
The table below shows the balance of the Company’s holdings of bullion as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2013 |
|
December 31, 2012 |
||||
|
|
Gold |
|
Silver |
|
Gold |
|
Silver |
|
|
(in thousands, except ounces and per ounce ) |
|
(in thousands, except ounces and per ounce ) |
||||
Ounces |
|
1,717 |
|
94,274 |
|
1,774 |
|
95,495 |
Carrying value per ounce |
$ |
1,192.00 |
$ |
18.86 |
$ |
1,659.83 |
$ |
30.00 |
Total carrying value |
$ |
2,047 |
$ |
1,778 |
$ |
2,945 |
$ |
2,864 |
The Company recorded impairment write-downs on its gold and silver bullion totaling $1.6 million and $1.7 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively.
4. Inventories
Inventories at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2013 |
|
2012 |
|
|
(in thousands) |
||
Ore stockpiles - underground mine |
$ |
1,901 |
$ |
1,466 |
Concentrates |
|
1,001 |
|
3,305 |
Materials and supplies |
|
4,214 |
|
2,762 |
Inventories - current |
|
7,116 |
|
7,533 |
|
|
|
|
|
Ore stockpiles - open pit mine |
|
797 |
|
809 |
Inventories - non-current |
|
797 |
|
809 |
Total inventories |
$ |
7,913 |
$ |
8,342 |
5. Property and Equipment
At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, property and equipment consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2013 |
|
2012 |
|
|
(in thousands) |
||
Trucks and autos |
$ |
1,864 |
$ |
1,631 |
Building |
|
1,737 |
|
1,737 |
Office furniture and equipment |
|
2,675 |
|
2,275 |
Machinery and equipment |
|
15,951 |
|
11,474 |
Subtotal |
|
22,227 |
|
17,117 |
Accumulated depreciation |
|
(4,254) |
|
(3,067) |
Total property and equipment, net |
$ |
17,973 |
$ |
14,050 |
8
Depreciation expense for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was $0.6 million and $0.2 million, respectively. Depreciation expense for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was $1.3 million and $0.5 million, respectively.
In May and June 2013, the Company entered into financing transactions with certain equipment financing companies whereby the Company sold to them mining equipment that was purchased by the Company from February 2013 through June 2013. The equipment was subsequently leased back to the Company for a three-year period with a bargain purchase option at the end of the lease term, which the Company intends to exercise. The Company will retain full use and all benefits attributable to the leased equipment.
The leased equipment qualifies as a capital lease and has been recorded at the present value of the future minimum lease payments, including the bargain purchase option and transaction fees, which approximates the net carrying value of the equipment. The equipment leases bear interest at 4.5% to 5.5% per annum, with monthly principal and interest payments of approximately $0.1 million over the three-year lease term. The Company has an option to purchase the equipment at the end of the lease term for less than $0.1 million. The present value of the future minimum lease payments, including the bargain purchase options and up-front transaction fees, totaled $4.8 million, of which $3.1 million is reflected as assets under capital lease and $1.7 is reflected as construction and development expenses. Depreciation on the leased assets is recorded over their estimated useful lives.
As of June 30, 2013, the Company’s obligations under capital leases are as follows:
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2013 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
2013 |
$ |
748 |
|
2014 |
|
1,621 |
|
2015 |
|
1,578 |
|
2016 |
|
901 |
|
Total payments due |
|
4,848 |
|
Less amounts representing interest |
|
(347) |
|
Subtotal |
|
4,501 |
|
Less current portion |
|
(1,376) |
|
Non-current portion |
$ |
3,125 |
|
6. Asset Retirement Obligation
The Company’s asset retirement obligation (“ARO”) relates to the estimated reclamation, remediation, and closure costs for its El Aguila Project. The following table presents the changes in ARO for June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2013 |
|
2012 |
|
|
(in thousands) |
||
Asset retirement obligation – opening balance |
$ |
2,790 |
$ |
2,281 |
Additions and changes in estimates |
|
- |
|
258 |
Foreign currency exchange gain |
|
14 |
|
170 |
Accretion |
|
57 |
|
81 |
Asset retirement obligation – ending balance |
$ |
2,861 |
$ |
2,790 |
9
7. Shareholders’ Equity
The Company declared dividends of $14.3 million and $17.5 million and paid dividends $15.9 million and $16.9 million during the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The Board of Directors has authorized the Company’s dividends to be charged to paid-in-capital until such time as the Company has retained earnings, at which time dividends will be charged to retained earnings to the extent that the Company has retained earnings. For the six months ended June 30, 2013, $0.2 million of declared dividends were charged to retained earnings and $14.1 million was charged to paid-in capital. For the six months ended June 30, 2012, all dividends were charged to paid-in capital.
8. Concentrate Sale Settlements
The Company records adjustments to sales of metals concentrate that result from final settlement of provisional invoices in the period that the final invoice settlement occurs. The Company also reviews assays taken at the mine site on its concentrate shipments, upon which the Company’s provisional invoices are based, to assays obtained from samples taken at the buyer’s warehouse prior to final settlement, upon which the final invoices are in part based, to assess whether an adjustment to sales is required prior to final invoice settlement. These adjustments resulted in a decrease of $0.7 million and $0.3 million to sales during the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively, and an increase to sales of $0.7 million and decrease to sales of $2.2 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively.
In addition to the final settlement adjustments on provisional invoices, the Company records a sales adjustment to mark-to-market outstanding provisional invoices at the end of each reporting period. These adjustments resulted in a decrease to sales of $2.1 million and $4.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively, and did not result in any change to sales for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012.
Smelter refining fees, treatment charges and penalties are netted against sales of metals concentrates in the condensed consolidated statement of operations. Total charges for these items totaled $3.3 million and $7.5 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and $3.8 million and $8.5 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012.
10. Stock Options
The Company has a non-qualified stock option and stock grant plan under which equity awards may be granted to key employees, directors and others (the “Plan”). A summary of activity under the Plan for the six months ended June 30, 2013 is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Options |
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price |
|
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (in yrs) |
|
Aggregate Intrinsic Value |
Outstanding as of January 1, 2013 |
6,020,000 |
$ |
8.55 |
|
6.1 |
$ |
46,698,100 |
Granted |
535,000 |
|
13.45 |
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
(210,000) |
|
17.64 |
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
(600,000) |
|
0.25 |
|
|
|
|
Outstanding as of June 30, 2013 |
5,745,000 |
$ |
9.53 |
|
6.4 |
$ |
16,838,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested and exercisable as of June 30, 2013 |
3,360,000 |
$ |
4.32 |
|
4.5 |
$ |
16,838,000 |
The fair value of options granted during the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 was $0.3 million and $3.0 million, respectively. The options vest over a three year period and have an exercise term of 10 years. The total fair value of stock options vested during the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 was nil and $0.7 million, respectively.
10
The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at June 30, 2013:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
Exercisable |
||||||
Range of Exercise Prices |
Number of Options |
|
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (in yrs) |
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price |
|
Number of Options |
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price |
$0.25 |
800,000 |
|
0.5 |
$ |
0.25 |
|
800,000 |
$ |
0.25 |
$3.40 - $3.95 |
2,000,000 |
|
5.2 |
$ |
3.68 |
|
2,000,000 |
$ |
3.68 |
$10.10 - $20.51 |
2,945,000 |
|
8.8 |
$ |
16.04 |
|
560,000 |
$ |
12.43 |
|
5,745,000 |
|
6.4 |
$ |
9.53 |
|
3,360,000 |
$ |
4.32 |
The fair value of stock option grants is amortized over the respective vesting period. Total stock-based compensation expense related to stock options for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was $2.2 million and $2.6 million, respectively, and for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was $3.7 million and $4.7 million, respectively. Stock-based compensation expense has been allocated between production costs and general and administrative expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
Six months ended June 30, |
||||
|
|
2013 |
|
2012 |
|
2013 |
|
2012 |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
(in thousands) |
||||
Production costs |
$ |
769 |
$ |
1,094 |
$ |
1,191 |
$ |
2,188 |
General and administrative expenses |
|
1,409 |
|
1,509 |
|
2,499 |
|
2,471 |
Total stock-based compensation |
$ |
2,178 |
$ |
2,603 |
$ |
3,690 |
$ |
4,659 |
The estimated unrecognized stock-based compensation expense from unvested options as of June 30, 2013 was approximately $14.7 million, and is expected to be recognized over the remaining vesting periods of up to 3.0 years.
The assumptions used to determine the value of stock-based awards under the Black-Scholes method are summarized below:
|
Six months ended June 30, |
||
|
2013 |
|
2012 |
Risk-free interest rate |
0.68% - 0.88% |
|
1.87% - 2.31% |
Dividend yield |
3.25% - 3.40% |
|
2.47% - 2.48% |
Expected volatility |
63.00% - 63.21% |
|
66.36% - 67.10% |
Expected life in years |
5 |
|
10 |
11. Other (expense) income
Other (expense) income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
Six months ended June 30, |
||||
|
|
2013 |
|
2012 |
|
2013 |
|
2012 |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
(in thousands) |
||||
Unrealized foreign currency exchange (loss) gain |
$ |
(337) |
$ |
1,278 |
$ |
(217) |
$ |
(705) |
Realized foreign currency exchange gain (loss) |
|
129 |
|
9 |
|
154 |
|
(233) |
Impairment (loss) on gold and silver bullion |
|
(1,565) |
|
(527) |
|
(1,743) |
|
(329) |
Realized (loss) from gold and silver bullion converted |
|
(50) |
|
(90) |
|
(89) |
|
(90) |
Interest income |
|
26 |
|
59 |
|
65 |
|
62 |
Other (expense) income |
|
(65) |
|
(37) |
|
(68) |
|
(2) |
Total other (expense) income |
$ |
(1,862) |
$ |
692 |
$ |
(1,898) |
$ |
(1,297) |
11
12. Income Taxes
The Company recorded an income tax (benefit) expense of $(1.3) million and $3.7 million for the three and six months ending June 30, 2013, respectively. During the three and six months ending June 30, 2012, the Company recorded income tax expense of $4.7 million and $10.8 million, respectively.
During the three and six months ending June 30, 2013, the Company has received advances of $5.1 million and $18.3 million, respectively, from its Mexican operations. The company has historically asserted permanent reinvestment of all Mexico earnings. The impact of the planned annual dividend for 2013, net of foreign tax credits, is reflected in the estimated annual effective tax rate.
In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities (including the impact of available carryback and carry forward periods), projected future taxable income and tax-planning strategies in making this assessment. As of June 30, 2013, the Company believes it has sufficient positive evidence to conclude that realization of its federal, state and foreign deferred tax assets of Gold Resource Corporation and Golden Trump Resources, S.A. de C.V. are more likely than not to be realized.
The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense. As of June 30, 2013, the Company has not identified any uncertain tax positions. The Company files income tax returns in U.S. federal and state jurisdictions, Mexico and Turkey. There are currently no U.S. federal or state, Mexico or Turkey income tax examinations underway for these jurisdictions. Furthermore, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal income tax examination by the Internal Revenue Service or by state and local tax authorities for tax years ended on or before December 31, 2010 or Mexican tax examinations for tax years ended on or before December 31, 2007, or Turkey tax examinations for tax years ended on or before December 31, 2011. Although certain tax years are closed under the statute of limitations, tax authorities can still adjust tax losses being carried forward to open tax years.
13. Net Income per Common Share
Basic earnings per share is calculated based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share is calculated based on the assumption that stock options outstanding, which have an exercise price less than the average market price of the Company’s common shares during the period, have been exercised on the later of the beginning of the period or the date granted and that the funds obtained from the exercise were used to purchase common shares at the average market price during the period.
The effect of potentially dilutive stock options on the weighted average number of shares outstanding for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
Six months ended June 30, |
||||
|
|
2013 |
|
2012 |
|
2013 |
|
2012 |
|
|
(in thousands, except share data) |
|
(in thousands, except share data) |
||||
Net (loss) income |
$ |
(1,373) |
$ |
4,128 |
$ |
6,013 |
$ |
17,629 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
53,272,776 |
|
52,909,756 |
|
52,977,712 |
|
52,904,370 |
Dilutive effect of stock options |
|
- |
|
3,533,663 |
|
2,456,762 |
|
3,496,322 |
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
53,272,776 |
|
56,443,419 |
|
55,434,474 |
|
56,400,692 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income per basic share |
$ |
(0.03) |
$ |
0.08 |
$ |
0.11 |
$ |
0.33 |
Net (loss) income per diluted share |
$ |
(0.03) |
$ |
0.07 |
$ |
0.11 |
$ |
0.31 |
12
Stock options totaling 2.9 million and 2.8 million for the three and six months ending June 30, 2013, respectively, were excluded from the computation of diluted weighted average shares outstanding, since the exercise price of those stock options exceeded the average market price of the Company’s common shares of $9.87 and $11.68 during the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively. Stock options totaling 0.8 million for both the three and six months ending June 30, 2012 were excluded from the computation of diluted weighted average shares outstanding, since the exercise price of those stock options exceeded the average market price of the Company’s common shares of $25.74 and $25.33 during the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively.
14. Legal Proceedings
A purported securities class action lawsuit filed against the Company on October 25, 2012 and subsequently captioned In re Gold Resource Corp. Securities Litigation, No.1:12-cv-02832 was pending in U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado. The complaint alleged violations of federal securities laws by the Company and certain of its officers and directors. On July 15, 2013, the federal district court granted the Company’s motion to dismiss the lawsuit with prejudice. The plaintiff filed notice it intends to appeal the District Court’s decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.
On February 8, 2013, a shareholder’s derivative lawsuit entitled City of Bristol Pension Fund v. Reid et al., No. 1:13-CV-00348 was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado naming the Company as a nominal defendant, and naming seven of its current and former officers and directors as defendants. The lawsuit alleges breach of fiduciary duty, gross mismanagement and unjust enrichment and seeks to recover, for the Company’s benefit, unspecified damages purportedly sustained by the Company in connection with the alleged misconduct identified in the class action lawsuit discussed above and an award of attorney’s fees and costs. The action was stayed pending resolution of the motion to dismiss in the securities class action lawsuit. There has been no discovery as the case is in its initial stages and accordingly, the Company is not in a position to assess the likelihood or estimate the potential range of loss associated with this matter, however, pursuant to the Company’s articles of incorporation, it is obligated to indemnify its officers and directors with respect to this litigation and the Company will bear the cost associated with defense of these claims.
13
ITEM 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion summarizes the results of operations of Gold Resource Corporation and its subsidiaries (“we”, “our”, or “us”) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and compares those results to the three and six months ended June 30, 2012. It also analyzes our financial condition at June 30, 2013 and compares it to our financial condition at December 31, 2012. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the Management’s Discussion and Analysis and the audited financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 and footnotes contained in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.
The discussion also presents certain Non-GAAP financial measures that are important to management in its evaluation of our operating results and which are used by management to compare our performance with what we perceive to be peer group mining companies and relied on as part of management’s decision-making process. Management believes these measures may also be important to investors in evaluating our performance. For a detailed description of each of the Non-GAAP financial measures, please see the discussion under “Non-GAAP Measures”.
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING EXPLORATION STAGE STATUS
AND USE OF CERTAIN MINING TERMS
We are considered an “exploration stage” company under the Securities and Exchange Commission Industry Guide 7, Description of Property by Issuers Engaged or to be Engaged in Significant Mining Operations (“Guide 7”), because we do not have reserves as defined under Guide 7. Reserves are defined in Guide 7 as that part of a mineral deposit which can be economically and legally extracted or produced at the time of the reserve determination. The establishment of reserves under Guide 7 requires, among other things, certain spacing of exploratory drill holes to establish the required continuity of mineralization and the completion of a detailed cost or feasibility study. Since we have no reserves as defined in Guide 7, we have not exited the exploration stage and continue to report our financial information as an exploration stage entity as required under relevant accounting principles.
Since we have no reserves, we have and will continue to expense all mine development, mill and other mine facility construction costs, even though these expenditures are expected to have a future economic benefit in excess of one year. We also expense our asset retirement obligations. Companies that have reserves and have exited the exploration stage typically capitalize these costs, and subsequently amortize them on a units-of-production basis as reserves are mined, with the resulting depletion charge allocated to inventory, and then to cost of sales as the inventory is sold. As a result of these and other differences, our financial statements will not be comparable to the financial statements of mining companies that have established reserves and have exited the exploration stage.
We use certain terms in this report such as “production,” “mining operations,” and “development,” which are terms typically used by companies that have established reserves and have exited the exploration stage under Guide 7. We use these terms in our report since we believe they are necessary and helpful for the reader to understand our business and operations. However, we caution you that we do not have reserves and therefore have not exited the exploration stage as defined in Guide 7, and our use of the terminology described above is not intended to indicate that we have established reserves or have exited the exploration stage for purposes of Guide 7. Furthermore, since we do not have reserves, we cannot provide any indication or assurance as to how long we will likely continue mining activities at our mine site or whether such activities will be profitable.
Overview
Business
We are an exploration stage mining company, in accordance with applicable guidelines of the SEC, which pursues gold and silver projects that are expected to have low operating costs and high returns on capital. We are presently focused on mineral production from mineralized material at the El Aguila Project in Oaxaca, Mexico. The mineralized material from the El Aguila open pit mine was processed into a metal concentrate containing the primary product of gold and silver, as a by-product. Operations at the El Aguila open pit mine ceased in February 2011 with the start-up of mine operations at the La Arista underground mine in March 2011. Our La Arista underground mine produces metal concentrates from mineralized material that contain our primary metal products of gold and silver, and by-products of copper, lead and zinc.
The mill located at our El Aguila Project produced a total of 20,574 precious metal gold equivalent ounces for the three months ended June 30, 2013. During this period we sold 19,992 precious metal gold equivalent ounces at a total cash cost (including royalties and as otherwise defined below) of $645 per precious metal gold equivalent ounce sold. The mill at our El Aguila Project produced a total of 42,999 precious metal gold equivalent ounces for the six months ended June 30, 2013.
14
During this period we sold 44,998 precious metal gold equivalent ounces at a total cash cost of $547 per precious metal gold equivalent ounce sold. Precious metal gold equivalent is determined by taking gold ounces produced or sold, plus silver ounces produced or sold converted to precious metal gold equivalent ounces using the gold to silver average price ratio for the period. The gold and silver average prices used to determine the gold to silver average price ratio are the actual metal prices realized from sales of our gold and silver. (Please see the section titled “Non-GAAP Measures” below for additional information concerning the cash cost per ounce measures.) For the three months ended June 30, 2013, we realized revenue of $26.7 million, mine gross profit of $11.1 million and net (loss) of $1.4 million. For the six months ended June 30, 2013, we realized revenue of $69.0 million, mine gross profit of $37.2 million and net income of $6.0 million.
Exploration Stage Company
We are considered an exploration stage company under SEC criteria since we have not demonstrated the existence of proven or probable reserves at our El Aguila Project in Oaxaca, Mexico or any of our other properties. Accordingly, as required under SEC guidelines and U.S. GAAP for companies in the exploration stage, substantially all of our investment in mining properties to date, including construction of the mill, mine facilities and mine development expenditures, have been expensed as incurred and therefore do not appear as assets on our balance sheet. Certain expenditures, such as expenses for rolling stock or other general purpose equipment may, be capitalized, subject to our evaluation of the possible impairment of the asset.
Our characterization as an exploration stage company has resulted in the classification of our construction and development expenditures as operating expenses rather than capital expenditures, and may cause us to report lower net income than if we had capitalized the expenditures. In addition, our financial statements do not reflect a corresponding depreciation or amortization expense for our construction and development costs since they are expensed as incurred rather than capitalized. Although the majority of our mine development and construction expenditures for the El Aguila Project were completed from 2008 through 2010, we expect underground mine development and capital improvements will continue during 2013 and subsequent years. We expect to remain as an exploration stage company for the foreseeable future. We will not exit the exploration stage until such time, if ever, that we demonstrate the existence of proven or probable reserves that meet SEC guidelines. Likewise, unless mineralized material is classified as proven or probable reserves, substantially all expenditures for mine development and construction will continue to be expensed as incurred.
Exploration Activities
El Aguila Project: Our exploration activities during the second quarter of 2013 at El Aguila continued to focus on development of the La Arista vein system. Thirty-eight diamond drill holes totaling 19,449 meters were completed during the second quarter of 2013, and sixty-two diamond drill holes totaling 33,079 meters have been completed year-to-date. Drilling principally targeted locating extensions to the Arista and Baja veins and in discovering additional veins. New mineralized discoveries included the switchback area approximately 500 meters to the northeast of the Arista vein. Other activities at El Aguila during the second quarter of 2013 included surface structural mapping, alteration mapping, geochemical sampling and condemnation drilling for the phase three proposed tailings dam where mineralization was intercepted and is being evaluated. The results from these activities have generated various exploration targets that are marked for future drilling.
Las Margaritas property: One diamond drill hole was completed in the second quarter of 2013 totaling 414 meters, and five diamond drill holes totaling 3,345 meters have been completed year-to-date. Additional exploration drilling at the Las Margaritas property is planned to resume later this year. Structural mapping, alteration mapping and geochemical sampling are ongoing at the property.
Cerro Colorado and El Fuego properties: In early 2013, we acquired two gold and silver properties in Oaxaca, Mexico for $0.2 million. The properties are subject to a 2% net smelter returns royalty on any future production. The properties are along the same mineralized trend and geologic structural corridor as our other properties in Mexico. The Cerro Colorado concessions were contiguous to and enlarged the area of our existing El Chamizo property, while the El Fuego concessions remain a separate property. Geologic mapping and surface sampling of these properties is planned for 2013.
Results of Operations
The following table summarizes our results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2012:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
Six months ended June 30, |
||||
|
|
2013 |
|
2012 |
|
2013 |
|
2012 |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
(in thousands) |
||||
Sales of metals concentrate, net |
$ |
26,660 |
$ |
30,700 |
$ |
68,971 |
$ |
67,364 |
Mine cost of sales |
|
15,516 |
|
12,774 |
|
31,792 |
|
19,969 |
Mine gross profit |
|
11,144 |
|
17,926 |
|
37,179 |
|
47,395 |
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
3,457 |
|
3,400 |
|
7,842 |
|
5,989 |
Exploration expenses |
|
2,806 |
|
2,231 |
|
6,105 |
|
3,584 |
Construction and development |
|
5,649 |
|
4,117 |
|
11,654 |
|
8,098 |
Total costs and expenses |
|
11,912 |
|
9,748 |
|
25,601 |
|
17,671 |
Operating (loss) income |
|
(768) |
|
8,178 |
|
11,578 |
|
29,724 |
Other (expense) income |
|
(1,862) |
|
692 |
|
(1,898) |
|
(1,297) |
(Loss) income before income taxes |
|
(2,630) |
|
8,870 |
|
9,680 |
|
28,427 |
Provision for income taxes (benefit) |
|
(1,257) |
|
4,742 |
|
3,667 |
|
10,798 |
Net (loss) income |
$ |
(1,373) |
$ |
4,128 |
$ |
6,013 |
$ |
17,629 |
15
Sales of metals concentrate, net
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, sales of concentrates totaled $26.7 million and $69.0 million respectively, net of treatment charges, compared to sales of $30.7 million and $67.4 million during the same period of 2012, a decrease of 13.0% and an increase of 2.4%, respectively. Although precious metal gold equivalent ounces sold during the second quarter of 2013 increased by 2,558 ounces or 14.7%, the decrease in second quarter 2013 sales principally resulted from falling metal prices. Precious metal prices realized in the second quarter of 2013 were lower when compared to the second quarter of 2012, with average realized gold prices decreasing to $1,386 from $1,603 per ounce, a 13.5% decrease, and average per ounce silver prices decreasing to $23 from $27 per ounce, a 14.8% decrease. Based on reported precious metal prices for July 2013, we expect this year over year decrease in sales to continue at least through the third quarter of 2013, and longer if prices do not recover. By-product revenues from copper, lead and zinc also decreased during the second quarter of 2013 due in part to lower average realized prices for copper and zinc. In addition, fewer tonnes of lead and zinc were sold due to a decrease in the average grade of lead and zinc mined in the second quarter. Revenue generated from sale of base metals contained in our concentrates is considered a by-product of our gold and silver production. (See “Production and Sales Statistics - La Arista Underground Mine” table below for additional information regarding our mineral production statistics for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012).
Sales for the six months ended June 30, 2013 increased by only $1.6 million, or 2.4%, when compared to the corresponding period in 2012, even though precious metal gold equivalent ounces sold for the six months ended June 30, 2013 increased to 44,998 ounces, or 17.3%, when compared to 38,370 ounces sold in the comparable preceding period. The increase in sales was due in part to the 2013 sale of excess concentrate inventory that had accumulated at the end of 2012 as well as an increase in the number of tonnes of mineralized material that was processed through the mill. In addition, although the average grades for all metals mined were lower for the six months ended 2013 as compared to 2012, the principal reason for the low increase in sales was due to lower realized gold and silver prices during the six months ended June 30, 2013 as compared to 2012. Gold prices realized for the six months ended June 30, 2013 decreased by 8.5% to $1,530 per ounce from $1,672 per ounce for the six months ended June 30, 2012, with average silver prices decreasing by 10% to $27 per ounce for the six months ended June 30, 2013 from $30 per ounce in 2012. Aggregate by-product revenues from copper, lead and zinc for the six months ended June 30, 2013 were comparable to the six months ended June 30, 2012.
Production
For the three months ended June 30, 2013, mill production totaled 20,574 precious metal gold equivalent ounces compared to 14,488 precious metal gold equivalent ounces for the three months ended June 30, 2012. The increase in mill production for the three months ended June 30, 2013 as compared to 2012 was due in part to higher gold and silver grades mined and a 21% increase in tonnes milled during the quarter ended June 30, 2013. See “Production and Sales Statistics-La Arista Underground Mine” table below for additional information regarding our mineral production statistics.
We continue to focus on mining and development activities at the La Arista underground mine. Our production rate at La Arista is directly a result of mine development and the establishment of sufficient stopes and working faces. A development drift to access the mineralized zone referred to as Splay 5 was completed at the end of the second quarter. Mining of mineralized material from this vein is expected to begin in the third quarter of 2013. We are currently mining the Arista vein using the long hole open stoping method, and the Baja vein and narrower parallel veins using the cut and fill method. We are also transitioning from manual to mechanized long hole stoping methods at the Arista vein, which we
16
anticipate will result in increased mine production and provide more mineralized material for processing at our mill, in connection with our mill expansion project.
The El Aguila mill expansion project is expected to increase the nominal mill processing rate from 900 tonnes per day to 1,500 tonnes per day. Commissioning of the mill expansion is expected to take place by the end of year. Although the mill is expected to have the capacity to process 1,500 tonnes of mineralized material per day, achieving this processing rate is also dependent on our ability to extract mineralized material from the mine at a minimum average rate of 1,500 tonnes per day. Although we are targeting a mining processing rate for mineralized material of 1,500 tonnes per day, there is no assurance that this mining rate can be achieved or sustained over the long-term.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production and Sales Statistics - La Arista Underground Mine |
||||||||
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
Six months ended June 30, |
||||
|
|
2013 |
|
2012 |
|
2013 |
|
2012 |
Production Summary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Milled: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tonnes Milled |
|
72,740 |
|
59,928 |
|
148,924 |
|
135,006 |
Tonnes Milled per Day |
|
808 |
|
659 |
|
823 |
|
742 |
Grade: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Gold Grade (g/t) |
|
3.83 |
|
3.73 |
|
3.75 |
|
4.03 |
Average Silver Grade (g/t) |
|
349 |
|
274 |
|
347 |
|
390 |
Average Copper Grade (%) |
|
0.38 |
|
0.38 |
|
0.39 |
|
0.44 |
Average Lead Grade (%) |
|
1.12 |
|
1.75 |
|
1.11 |
|
1.74 |
Average Zinc Grade (%) |
|
2.61 |
|
4.01 |
|
2.70 |
|
3.78 |
Recoveries: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Gold Recovery (%) |
|
90 |
|
88 |
|
89 |
|
89 |
Average Silver Recovery (%) |
|
92 |
|
92 |
|
92 |
|
93 |
Average Copper Recovery (%) |
|
72 |
|
70 |
|
78 |
|
74 |
Average Lead Recovery (%) |
|
70 |
|
69 |
|
70 |
|
72 |
Average Zinc Recovery (%) |
|
74 |
|
78 |
|
77 |
|
76 |
Mill production (before payable metal deductions)(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gold (ozs.) |
|
8,015 |
|
6,342 |
|
15,913 |
|
15,564 |
Silver (ozs.) |
|
747,646 |
|
487,053 |
|
1,525,317 |
|
1,577,534 |
Copper (tonnes) |
|
202 |
|
161 |
|
450 |
|
442 |
Lead (tonnes) |
|
573 |
|
720 |
|
1,159 |
|
1,683 |
Zinc (tonnes) |
|
1,405 |
|
1,876 |
|
3,081 |
|
3,862 |
Payable metal sold |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gold (ozs.) |
|
7,297 |
|
7,292 |
|
16,250 |
|
13,029 |
Silver (ozs.) |
|
755,746 |
|
606,429 |
|
1,618,898 |
|
1,383,367 |
Copper (tonnes) |
|
194 |
|
192 |
|
499 |
|
388 |
Lead (tonnes) |
|
496 |
|
674 |
|
1,139 |
|
1,385 |
Zinc (tonnes) |
|
1,180 |
|
1,999 |
|
2,915 |
|
3,075 |
Average metal prices realized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gold (oz.) |
$ |
1,386 |
$ |
1,603 |
$ |
1,530 |
$ |
1,672 |
Silver (oz.) |
$ |
23 |
$ |
27 |
$ |
27 |
$ |
30 |
Copper (tonne) |
$ |
7,114 |
$ |
7,688 |
$ |
7,652 |
$ |
8,155 |
Lead (tonne) |
$ |
2,127 |
$ |
1,973 |
$ |
2,308 |
$ |
2,060 |
Zinc (tonne) |
$ |
1,848 |
$ |
1,912 |
$ |
2,030 |
$ |
1,992 |
Precious metal gold equivalent ounces produced (mill production)(1)(3)(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gold Ounces |
|
8,015 |
|
6,342 |
|
15,913 |
|
15,564 |
Gold Equivalent Ounces from Silver |
|
12,559 |
|
8,146 |
|
27,086 |
|
28,903 |
Total Precious Metal Gold Equivalent Ounces |
|
20,574 |
|
14,488 |
|
42,999 |
|
44,467 |
Precious metal gold equivalent ounces sold(2)(3)(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gold Ounces |
|
7,297 |
|
7,292 |
|
16,250 |
|
13,029 |
Gold Equivalent Ounces from Silver |
|
12,695 |
|
10,142 |
|
28,748 |
|
25,342 |
Total Precious Metal Gold Equivalent Ounces |
|
19,992 |
|
17,434 |
|
44,998 |
|
38,370 |
Total Cash Cost per Precious Metal Gold Equivalent Ounce Sold(2) |
$ |
645 |
$ |
497 |
$ |
547 |
$ |
352 |
17
(1) |
Mill production represents metal contained in concentrates produced at the mill, which is before payable metal deductions are levied by the buyer of our concentrates. Payable metal deduction quantities are defined in our contracts with the buyer of our concentrates and represent an estimate of metal contained in the concentrates produced at our mill, for which the buyer cannot recover through the smelting process. There are inherent limitations and differences in the sampling method and assaying of estimated metal contained in concentrates that are shipped, and those contained metal estimates derived from sampling methods and assaying throughout the mill production process. The Company monitors these differences to insure that precious metal mill production quantities are materially correct. In addition, mill production quantities for the three months and six months ended March 31, 2012 do not reflect any deduction for 583 gold ounces and 45,432 silver ounces, respectively, (approximately 1,400 gold equivalent ounces) resulting from a settlement agreement with the buyer of our concentrates. |
(2) |
A reconciliation of this Non-GAAP measure to mine cost of sales, the most comparable U.S. GAAP measure, can be found below in “Non-GAAP Measures”. |
(3) |
Precious metal gold equivalent mill production for the second quarter of 2013 of 20,574 ounces differs from gold equivalent ounces sold for 2013 of 19,992 due principally to buyer (smelter) concentrate processing deductions of approximately 1,775 gold equivalent ounces and an increase in gold equivalent ounces contained in ending inventory of approximately 1,193 ounces.. |
(4) |
Precious metal gold equivalent mill production for the six months ended June 30, 2013 of 42,999 ounces differs from gold equivalent ounces sold for 2013 of 44,998 principally due to buyer (smelter) concentrate processing deductions of approximately 4,033 gold equivalent ounces and an increase in gold equivalent ounces contained in ending inventory of approximately 6,032 ounces. |
Mine gross profit. For the three months ended June 30, 2013, mine gross profit totaled $11.1 million compared to $17.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012. The decrease in gross profit principally results from higher operating costs and lower realized metal prices in the second quarter of 2013. Our costs have increased as we mine deeper mineralized zones at La Arista, and include increases in personnel, on-site contractors, repairs and maintenance, security, safety costs, fuel, materials and supplies. These factors have contributed to a decrease in our gross profit percentage from 58.3% for the three months ended June 30, 2012 to 41.6% for the three months ended June 30, 2013. For the six months ended June 30, 2013, mine gross profit totaled $37.2 million compared to $47.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012. Gross profit percentages for the six months ended June 30, 2013 decreased to 53.9% from 70.3% for the six months ended June 30, 2012. The decrease in mine gross profit from the prior period was also primarily due to an increase in operating costs and lower realized metal prices for the six months ended June 30, 2013 as compared to 2012.
Net (loss) income. For the three months ended June 30, 2013, net (loss) income was $(1.4) million, or $(0.03) per basic share, as compared to $4.1 million, or $0.08 per basic share, for the comparable period of 2012. Lower net income for the three months ended June 30, 2013 principally resulted from lower realized prices on metals sold, and an increase in production costs, exploration and construction and development expenses. For the six months ended June 30, 2013, net income was $6.0 million, or $0.11 per basic share, as compared to $17.6 million, or $0.33 per basic share, for the comparable period of 2012. The decrease in net income results for the six months ended June 30, 2013 of $11.6 million as compared to 2012 was also principally attributable to a decrease in metal prices, and higher production, general and administrative, exploration, and construction and development expenses.
Costs and expenses. Total costs and expenses during the three months ended June 30, 2013 were $11.9 million compared to $9.8 million during the comparable period of 2012, an increase of $2.1 million, or 21.4%, and principally resulted from an increase in construction and development expenses as discussed in more detail below. Total costs and expenses during the six months ended June 30, 2013 were $25.6 million compared to $17.7 million during the comparable period of 2012, an increase of $7.9 million, or 44.6%.The increase in cost and expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2013, as discussed in more detail below, resulted from increases in exploration, general and administrative, and construction and development expenses.
General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2013 of $3.5 million, were comparable to $3.4 million for the same period of 2012. General and administrative expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2013 were $7.8 million, compared to $6.0 million for the same period of 2012. The increase in general and administrative expenses of $1.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 principally resulted from an increase in insurance, computer IT support, compensation, investor relations and legal expenses.
Exploration expenses. Exploration expenses totaled $2.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013 as compared to $2.2 million for the corresponding period in 2012. The $0.6 million increase principally resulted from an increase in drilling activity at the El Aguila project. Exploration expenses totaled $6.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, compared to $3.6 million for the same periods of 2012. The increase in 2013 principally resulted from an aerial geophysical survey over our Oaxaca property trend, and a drilling program performed on our Las Margaritas property during the first quarter of 2013. Exploration costs associated with definition and delineation drilling of the La Arista vein system are reflected in construction and development expenses.
Construction and development expenses. Construction and development expenses during the three months ended June 30, 2013 were $5.7 million, compared to $4.1 million during the comparable period in 2012. Construction and development expenses during the six months ended June 30, 2013 were $11.7 million, as compared to $8.1 million during the comparable period in 2012. The increase in construction and development expenses for both the three and six months ended June 30,
18
2013 was principally due to our mill expansion project that commenced in early 2013. In addition to mine construction expenses, construction and development expense also includes drilling definition and delineation of the La Arista vein system.
Other (expense) income. For the three months ended June 30, 2013, we recorded other expense of $1.9 million compared to other income of $0.7 million during the same period of 2012. For the six months ended June 30, 2013, we recorded other expense of $1.9 million compared to other expense of $1.3 million during the same period of 2012. The $2.6 million decrease in other expense for the three months ended June 30, 2013 as compared to the comparable period in 2012 principally resulted from a $1.0 million increase in impairment on gold and silver bullion and a $1.6 million increase in unrealized foreign currency losses. The $0.6 million increase in other expense for the six months ended June 30, 2013 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2012 resulted from an increase in impairment of gold and silver bullion of $1.4 million, which was partially offset by a decrease in foreign currency losses of $0.5 million.
Provision (benefit) for income taxes. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, the Company recorded an income tax (benefit) expense of $(1.3) million and $3.7 million, respectively. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company recorded income tax expense of $4.7 million and $10.8 million, respectively. The decrease in income tax expense during the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 resulted from lower net income before taxes in 2013 as compared to 2012.
Non-GAAP Measures
Throughout this report, we have provided information prepared or calculated according to U.S. GAAP, as well as provided some Non-U.S. GAAP (“Non-GAAP”) performance measures. Because the Non-GAAP performance measures do not have any standardized meaning prescribed by U.S. GAAP, they may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies. Accordingly, these measures are intended to provide additional information and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
Total Cash Cost per Precious Metal Gold Equivalent Ounce Sold
We use total cash cost (including royalties) per precious metal gold equivalent ounce sold, calculated in accordance with the Gold Institute’s Standard, as one indicator for comparative monitoring of our mining operations from period to period and believe that investors also find this information helpful when evaluating our performance. Total cash costs are arrived at by taking mine cost of sales, plus treatment and refining charges (which are netted against revenues in the unaudited consolidated statements of operations), less by-product credits earned from sales of metals we consider by-products (copper, lead and zinc), less any noncash items such as depreciation, amortization, accretion and stock-based compensation, and reclamation costs. Total cash costs are divided by precious metal gold equivalent ounces sold (gold sold, plus gold equivalent ounces of silver sold converted to gold using our realized gold price to silver price ratio) to arrive at total cash cost per precious metal gold equivalent ounce sold. There can be no assurance that our reporting of this Non-GAAP measure is similar to that reported by other mining companies.