o
|
Preliminary Proxy Statement | |
o
|
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) | |
o
|
Definitive Proxy Statement | |
þ
|
Definitive Additional Materials | |
o
|
Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 |
þ | No fee required. | |||||
o | Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. | |||||
1) | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: | |||||
2) | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: | |||||
3) | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): | |||||
4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: | |||||
5) | Total fee paid: | |||||
o | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. | |||||
o | Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. | |||||
1) | Amount Previously Paid: | |||||
2) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: | |||||
3) | Filing Party: | |||||
4) | Date Filed: | |||||
| Press release issued by the Company on January 25, 2007 | ||
| Letter mailed to stockholders of the Company on or about January 25, 2006 (the 10-K Cover) along with the Companys Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006 and its definitive proxy statement for its 2007 annual meeting | ||
| Cover letter mailed to certain stockholders of the Company on or about January 25, 2006 along with the Companys Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006 and its definitive proxy statement for its 2007 annual meeting | ||
| Transcript of the Companys earnings webcast held on January 25, 2007 |
Contacts: |
||
Phoenix Technologies Ltd.
|
Sapphire Investor Relations, LLC | |
Richard Arnold
|
Erica Mannion, Investor Relations | |
Executive Vice President
|
212-766-1800 | |
Strategy and Corporate Development
|
investor_relations@phoenix.com | |
Chief Financial Officer |
||
408-570-1256 |
||
investor_relations@phoenix.com |
1
2
3
4
December 31, | September 30, | |||||||
2006 | 2006 | |||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
25,126 | 34,743 | ||||||
Marketable Securities |
25,485 | 25,588 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, net of allowances |
5,924 | 8,434 | ||||||
Prepaid royalties and maintenance |
68 | 111 | ||||||
Other current assets |
4,038 | 4,052 | ||||||
Total current assets |
60,641 | 72,928 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net |
3,714 | 4,247 | ||||||
Purchased Technology and Intangible assets, net |
1,167 | 1,458 | ||||||
Goodwill |
14,433 | 14,433 | ||||||
Other assets |
2,017 | 2,094 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 81,972 | $ | 95,160 | ||||
Liabilities and stockholders equity |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 1,471 | $ | 3,072 | ||||
Accrued compensation and related liabilities |
3,151 | 3,844 | ||||||
Deferred revenue |
5,152 | 7,584 | ||||||
Income taxes payable |
9,114 | 9,041 | ||||||
Accrued restructuring charges current |
2,448 | 3,287 | ||||||
Other accrued liabilities |
2,522 | 3,605 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
23,858 | 30,433 | ||||||
Accrued restructuring charges noncurrent |
941 | 1,166 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
3,324 | 3,385 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
28,123 | 34,984 | ||||||
Stockholders equity: |
||||||||
Preferred stock |
| | ||||||
Common stock |
35 | 34 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
193,234 | 191,519 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
(46,911 | ) | (38,899 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(831 | ) | (800 | ) | ||||
Less: Cost of treasury stock |
(91,678 | ) | (91,678 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders equity |
53,849 | 60,176 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 81,972 | $ | 95,160 | ||||
Three Months ended December 31, | ||||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||
License fees |
$ | 7,924 | $ | 18,072 | ||||
Services fees |
1,800 | 517 | ||||||
Total revenues |
9,724 | 18,589 | ||||||
Cost of revenues: |
||||||||
License fees |
265 | 1,321 | ||||||
Services fees |
1,997 | 2,457 | ||||||
Amortization of purchased technology |
292 | 838 | ||||||
Total cost of revenues |
2,554 | 4,616 | ||||||
Gross Margin |
7,170 | 13,973 | ||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||
Research and development |
4,546 | 5,832 | ||||||
Sales and marketing |
4,140 | 9,624 | ||||||
General and administrative |
4,228 | 5,494 | ||||||
Amortization of acquired intangible assets |
| 18 | ||||||
Restructuring |
2,211 | | ||||||
Total operating expenses |
15,125 | 20,968 | ||||||
Income (loss) from operations |
(7,955 | ) | (6,995 | ) | ||||
Interest and other income, net |
573 | 555 | ||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
(7,382 | ) | (6,440 | ) | ||||
Income tax expense |
629 | 1,483 | ||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | (8,011 | ) | $ | (7,923 | ) | ||
Earnings (loss) per share: |
||||||||
Basic |
$ | (0.31 | ) | $ | (0.32 | ) | ||
Diluted |
$ | (0.31 | ) | $ | (0.32 | ) | ||
Shares used in Earnings (loss) per share calculation: |
||||||||
Basic |
25,474 | 25,014 | ||||||
Diluted |
25,474 | 25,014 |
Three Months Ended December 31, | ||||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | (8,011 | ) | $ | (7,923 | ) | ||
Reconciliation to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
884 | 1,539 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation |
1,151 | 1,405 | ||||||
Loss from disposal of fixed assets |
28 | (2 | ) | |||||
Deferred income tax |
| | ||||||
Change in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable |
2,492 | (3,564 | ) | |||||
Prepaid royalties and maintenance |
43 | 569 | ||||||
Other assets |
90 | 850 | ||||||
Accounts payable |
(1,614 | ) | (156 | ) | ||||
Accrued compensation and related liabilities |
(801 | ) | (28 | ) | ||||
Deferred Revenue |
(2,449 | ) | 5,637 | |||||
Income taxes |
72 | 731 | ||||||
Accrued Restructuring charges |
(1,070 | ) | (71 | ) | ||||
Other accrued |
(1,049 | ) | (539 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
(10,234 | ) | (1,552 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||
Proceeds from sales and maturities of marketable securities |
48,128 | 88,512 | ||||||
Purchases of marketable securities |
(48,025 | ) | (77,100 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from the sale of fixed assets |
| | ||||||
Purchases of property and equipment |
(87 | ) | (738 | ) | ||||
Payments in connection with prior business acquisition |
| | ||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
16 | 10,674 | ||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||
Proceeds from stock purchases under stock option and stock purchase plans |
565 | 1,026 | ||||||
Repurchase of common stock |
| (993 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
565 | 33 | ||||||
Effect of changes in exchange rates |
36 | (44 | ) | |||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
(9,617 | ) | 9,111 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
34,743 | 27,805 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 25,126 | $ | 36,916 | ||||
* | Reclassification of investment was done as of June 2006 (Q306) $9.1M to beginning cash (row 43) |
Three Months Ended December 31, | ||||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
GAAP net income (loss) |
$ | (8,011 | ) | $ | (7,923 | ) | ||
(1) Equity-based compensation expense
under SFAS 123R (see note below) |
1,135 | 1,405 | ||||||
(2) Restructuring |
2,211 | | ||||||
Non-GAAP net income (loss) |
$ | (4,665 | ) | $ | (6,518 | ) | ||
Non-GAAP Earnings (loss) per share: |
||||||||
Basic |
$ | (0.18 | ) | $ | (0.26 | ) | ||
Diluted |
$ | (0.18 | ) | $ | (0.26 | ) | ||
Shares used in Earnings (loss) per share calculation: |
||||||||
Basic |
25,474 | 25,014 | ||||||
Diluted |
25,474 | 25,014 |
(1) | This number represents non-cash equity-based compensation expense related to the Companys adoption of SFAS No. 123R beginning October 1, 2005. For the three months ending December 31, 2006, non-cash equity-based compensation was $1.1 million, allocated as follows: $0.3 million to research and development, $0.3 million to sales and marketing and $0.5 million to general and administrative. Management believes that it is useful to investors to understand how the expenses associated with the adoption of SFAS 123R are reflected in net income. | |
(2) | The Company has incurred restructuring expenses, included in its GAAP presentation of operating expense, primarily due to workforce related charges such as payments for severance and benefits and estimated costs of exiting and terminating facility lease commitments related to formal restructuring plans approved by the Board of Directors in June 2006, in September 2006, and November 2006. For the three months ending December 31, 2006, severance and benefits totaled $1.9 million and cost related to exiting and terminating two facility lease totaled $0.4 million. In addition, the Company decreased the fiscal year 2003 restructuring reserve for the Irvine facility by $0.1 million due to a revised projection of the liability over the remaining term of the lease. The Company believes that these items do not reflect expected future operating expenses nor does the Company believe that they provide a meaningful evaluation of current versus past operational performance. Net income for the three months ended December 31, 2005 did not include restructuring expenses. |
Three Months Ended December 31, | Three Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||||||
GAAP net income (loss) |
$ | (8,011 | ) | $ | (7,923 | ) | $ | (14,321 | ) | $ | (5,693 | ) | ||||
(1) Equity-based compensation expense
under SFAS 123R (see note below) |
1,135 | 1,405 | 938 | | ||||||||||||
(2) Restructuring |
2,211 | | 2,731 | | ||||||||||||
Non-GAAP net income (loss) |
$ | (4,665 | ) | $ | (6,518 | ) | $ | (10,652 | ) | $ | (5,693 | ) | ||||
Non-GAAP Earnings (loss) per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | (0.18 | ) | $ | (0.26 | ) | $ | (0.42 | ) | $ | (0.23 | ) | ||||
Diluted |
$ | (0.18 | ) | $ | (0.26 | ) | $ | (0.42 | ) | $ | (0.23 | ) | ||||
Shares used in Earnings (loss) per share calculation: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
25,474 | 25,014 | 25,323 | 24,893 | ||||||||||||
Diluted |
25,474 | 25,014 | 25,323 | 24,983 |
(1) | This number represents non-cash equity-based compensation expense related to the Companys adoption of SFAS No. 123R beginning October 1, 2005. For the three months ending December 31, 2006, non-cash equity-based compensation was $1.1 million, allocated as follows: $0.3 million to research and development, $0.3 million to sales and marketing and $0.5 million to general and administrative. For the three months ended September 30, 2006, non-cash equity-based compensation was $0.9 million, allocated as follows: $0.1 million to cost of goods sold, $0.2 million to research and development, $0.3 million to sales and marketing and $0.3 million to general and administrative. Management believes that it is useful to investors to understand how the expenses associated with the adoption of SFAS 123R are reflected in net income. Net income for the three months ending September 30, 2005 did not include equity-based compensation expense under SFAS 123. | |
(2) | The Company has incurred restructuring expenses, included in its GAAP presentation of operating expense, primarily due to workforce related charges such as payments for severance and benefits and estimated costs of exiting and terminating facility lease commitments related to formal restructuring plans approved by the Board of Directors in June, September, and November 2006. For the three months ending December 31, 2006, severance and benefits totaled $1.9 million and cost related to exiting and terminating facility lease totaled $0.4 million. In addition, the Company decreased the fiscal year 2003 restructuring reserve for the Irvine facility by $0.1 million due to a revised projection of the liability over the remaining term of the lease. For the three months ended September 30, 2006, severance and benefits totaled $2.1 million and cost related to exiting and terminating facility lease totaled $0.1 million. In addition, the Company increased the fiscal year 2003 restructuring reserve for the Irvine facility by $0.5 million due to projected increased operating expenses over the remaining term of the lease. The Company believes that these items do not reflect expected future operating expenses nor does the Company believe that they provide a meaningful evaluation of current versus past operational performance. |
Sincerely, |
||||
/s/ Scott C. Taylor | ||||
Scott C. Taylor | ||||
Chief Administrative Officer, SVP and General Counsel | ||||
Operator:
|
Good day, everyone, and thank you for joining us on Phoenix Technologies First Fiscal Quarter 2007 Financial Results conference call. I would like to remind you that this call is being recorded and simultaneously Webcast at www.phoenix.com. | |
At this time, Id like to turn the call over to Erica Mannion of Sapphire Investor Relations for opening remarks and introductions. Erica, please go ahead. | ||
Erica Mannion:
|
Thank you. Good morning. Thank you and thank you for joining us to discuss Phoenix Technologies financial and operating results. | |
With me today are Woody Hobbs, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Richard Arnold, Executive Vice President, Strategy and Corporate Development and Chief Financial Officer. | ||
Before I turn the call over to Rich, I would like to mention on the call today you may hear forward-looking statements about events and circumstances that have not yet occurred. Actual outcome and results may differ materially from the expectations contained in these statements due to a number of risks and uncertainties. Please refer to the companys recent SEC filings at the SEC web site at www.sec.gov or the Safe Harbor located in this press release for a detailed |
discussions of the relevant risks and uncertainties. The company undertakes no responsibility to update this information in the conference call under any circumstance. | ||
The press release distributed today that announced the companys results is available on our web site at www.phoenix.com in the investor relations section under financial press releases. The current report on form 8K furnished with respect to our press release is available on our web site in the investor relations section under SEC filings. | ||
This conference call is also being recorded for replay and is being Webcast. The Webcast will be available on the companys web site until February 26th, 2007. | ||
Now, it is my pleasure to hand the call over to Rich Arnold, Phoenix Technologies Executive Vice President, Strategy and Corporate Development and Chief Financial Officer. Rich? | ||
Richard Arnold:
|
Thank you, Erica. Good morning to everyone and thanks for joining us for the Phoenix Technologies first quarterly earnings call for fiscal year 2007. This is the first full quarter of operations under our new management team. | |
As indicated in our press release, net revenues during the three months ended December 31, 2006 were 9.7 million. This compares to net revenues of 8.3 million reported in the quarter ended September 30th of 2006, and 18.6 million for the quarter ended December 31st of 2005. The comparison periods both included revenue from fully paid up licenses, which were 1.3 million in the immediate prior quarter and 11.8 million in the year earlier period. In accordance for that previously announced decision in the first quarter of fiscal year 2007, we had no revenue from paid up licenses. |
On a GAAP basis, the net loss in the first quarter of fiscal 2007 was 8.0 million, or 31 cents per share, compared with a net loss of 14.3 million, or 57 cents a share, for the fourth quarter of fiscal 06, and a net loss of 7.9 million, or 32 cents a share, for the first quarter of that year. | ||
On a non-GAAP basis, in the first fiscal quarter of 2007 Phoenix reported a net loss of 4.7 million, or 18 cents a share, a $6 million dollar, or 24 cents a share, improvement when compared to the non-GAAP net loss of 10.7 million, 42 cents a share, for the fourth quarter of fiscal year 06. | ||
In the first quarter of the previous year, the non-GAAP net loss was 6.5 million, or 26 cents a share, so the current quarter result is an improvement of 1.8 million, or eight cents a share, despite revenue having been reduced by 48 percent. | ||
Total non-GAAP adjustments in the first quarter of fiscal year 2007 were 3.3 million and include non-cash stock compensation expense as required according to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards 123R, as well as a restructuring charge of 2.2 million covering severance and related costs and additional expense associated with a facility closure in Europe. These non- GAAP adjustments are more fully described in the reconciliation between net loss on a GAAP basis and non-GAAP net loss provided in the financial statements which accompanied the press release. | ||
Regarding net revenue performance in Q1, as I said, this quarter marks the first full quarter of operations since Woody and I arrived along with Dr. Gaurav Banga, our new CTO. Our performance this quarter, therefore, reflects the beginning stages of execution of our new product and pricing strategies, and also the effects of key operating decisions that were taken in late fiscal year 2006. | ||
As weve announced previously, weve ceased marketing and sales of enterprise application products and have discontinued the use of fully paid up licenses. Net license revenue for the first |
quarter of fiscal year 2007, including zero paid up license revenue, were 7.9 million. This represented a 13 percent improvement over license revenue for the previous quarter ended September 2006 when net license revenue was 7 million, though it was a significant reduction from the license revenue in the year earlier period of 18.1 million. Our cessation of the use of fully paid up licenses has helped us to stabilize the prices were able to achieve for our products and services. Weve now increased our use of volume pricing agreements with our larger customers, which we believe helps us to achieve a higher level of predictability of future license and service revenues. Were, therefore, returning today to the practice of providing guidance as to our revenue expectations, which Woody will discuss later in the call. | ||
During the first quarter of fiscal 2007, we entered into several of these large volume purchase agreements, or VPAs. These agreements are generally non-cancelable set prices with the specific customer for a year in advance and have payment terms spread over a nine to 12 month period. Under our accounting policies, only those payments that are due within 90 days are considered fixed and determinable, and therefore invoiced and recorded on our books as either current or deferred revenue. VPA fees that are payable beyond 90 days are not considered fixed and determinable and are therefore neither invoiced nor immediately recorded on the companys financial statements. | ||
As a result of sales achieved during the first quarter of fiscal 2007, the amount of such volume purchase agreements which has not been recorded by the company was approximately 16.7 million. The company expects to invoice and recognize revenue on these agreements in the full amount of that 16.7 million over the next nine months. | ||
In the future, we expect to regularly report to the market on the outstanding unbooked amount of such volume purchase agreements. We anticipate that these transactions are likely to be somewhat cyclical with a bias towards calendar year-end sales, and hence towards higher unbooked for amounts at the end of our first fiscal quarter than at the end of subsequent quarters |
in the financial year. Due to the previous use of fully paid up licenses, were unable to provide comparisons to periods prior to the current quarter. | ||
We also ended the current quarter with deferred revenues of 5.2 million, a reduction of 2.4 million from the balance of September 30. With our increase in the use of volume purchase agreements, we do not expect to see growth in our deferred revenue balances in future periods. Together with the VPA agreement backlog discussed earlier, we now have executed sales agreements which reflect in total 21.9 million of anticipated future revenue. Our service revenue for the first quarter of fiscal year 2006 was 1.8 million, which represents 34 percent growth over the immediate previous quarter and almost 250 percent growth over the same period a year ago. These increases reflect the initial effects of our revised sales and pricing policies as well as strong performance by our customer support teams. | ||
In respect of gross margin and operating expenses, our gross margin percentage increased from 63 percent in Q4 of fiscal year 06 to 74 percent in Q1 of fiscal 07. The improvement in the overall gross margin percentage resulted from four factors, higher overall revenues, lower service costs due to our expense reduction efforts, lower royalties due to our withdrawal from the marketing of enterprise application products, and lower costs from amortization of purchase technology due to the Q3 write-off of these assets. Were particularly encouraged by the improvement weve achieved in margin on services, which while still negative in the amount of 0.2 million, is substantially improved from the 0.8 million of negative services margin in the previous quarter, and 1.9 million of negative services margin in the same quarter a year ago. | ||
Total operating expenses decreased by 5.7 million, or 27 percent, from 20.8 million in Q4 of fiscal 06 to 15.1 million in Q1. R&D, sales and marketing, and G&A expenses all decreased by 11 percent, 42 percent and 23 percent, respectively. These reductions reflect our ongoing expense management, and they demonstrate the degree to which weve focused our cuts in marketing and overhead areas. |
Included within the first quarter 07 operating expenses, are restructuring charges of approximately 2.2 million, which compares to 2.7 million in restructuring charges that had been taken in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 06. The Q1 restructuring charge included estimated severance and related costs of approximately 1.9 million in respect of staff reductions of 58 employees. Headcount at the end of December was 354, down significantly from recent peak staffing levels of 521. We also had several employees leave the company as of the 31st of December, 2006, so our head count on January 1 of 07 was 334, consistent with the target wed announced in November. With the restructurings in the fourth quarter of 06 and the quarter just ended, as well as other reductions in costs and operating expenses, we now believe that our total expenses for the second fiscal quarter, including cost of goods sold, should fall slightly below our previously announced target of 15 million. | ||
Turning now to the balance sheet and cash flow statement, our balance sheet remains strong with cash and short term investment balances of 50.6 million December 31st. This reflects a decline of 9.7 million from the balance at September 30th of 60.3 million, principally as a result of negative cash flow from operations. We expect to continue to operate at negative cash flow in the second quarter of fiscal year 07, principally as a result of continuing operating deficits and the accrued but unpaid portions of severance payments and other restructuring costs associated with the Q4 and Q1 expense reduction programs. However, we anticipate this negative cash flow will be substantially reduced from that experienced in the last two quarters. We also continue to expect some recovery during the second half of fiscal year 07 as certain paid up licenses expire, so we continue to expect a total deficit operating cash flow for the full financial year of approximately 15 million. | ||
That completes my comments on the financial results. Id now like to hand over to Woody, our CEO. |
Woody Hobbs:
|
Thank you, Rich. As you can tell from Richs comments, we have had a great beginning to our first fiscal year here at Phoenix. The results we have just announced are exactly in line with our plan for the company and reflect very important accomplishments made in a short time frame by the new management team. | |
As most of you know, when I arrived in Phoenix in September of 2006, the company was in the process of completing a quarter, in which it lost 14 million, on revenues of eight million, and a half a year in which it lost 33 million on revenues of 19 million. Radical action was required to restore the company to a healthy operating condition. And I am very happy to report to you now, that the new management team and I have taken the required actions, substantially reduced operating cost, and have successfully set the company on the course that we outlined in our report to you, three months ago, shortly after we arrived here. | ||
The results we have just announced are inline with and even slightly better than our original plan for the first quarter. And we are expecting the remainder of the year to further justify the confidence we expressed during last quarters call. Our staff reductions have been conducted smoothly and efficiently, without any noticeable disruptions to our core business, and we met our announced target of having only 334 employees on January one. As Rich mentioned, we have achieved our stated intention of reducing our planned spending, including both cost of sales, and operating expenses, to below 15 million for the quarter which has just begun. | ||
But Phoenix is not going to be restored to health simply through expense reductions. To build a healthy and growing business we also need to be succeeding on the revenue front. And Im extremely pleased to report that we have made substantial progress in this regard also in the first fiscal quarter. We needed to establish disciplined transaction approval and pricing policies and stick to them in the face of some inevitable resistance. We have done that. A significant number of our major customers have entered into new license agreements with us this quarter, and all of |
those agreements were approved under our new processes and reflect our newly established rigorous pricing policies. | ||
We needed to be aggressive about beginning to be fairly paid for the extensive services we provide to our customers, in order to begin returning our services business to positive gross margins. We have done that. For the first time in years, the company has substantially reduced its negative margin on services, and we are confident that we will continue this trend in order to meet our longer term targets of delivering services profitability. We needed to begin the process of remonetizing customers, to whom the previous management had sold fully paid up licenses. We have done that. The first such customer entered into a new revenue generating agreement with us, this quarter. And although we do not expect much further improvement on this front in the current quarter, we are now more than more confident than ever of our prospects for significant revenue growth in the second half of this fiscal year. | ||
We needed to begin winning business from at least one of the major OEMs that had previously relied solely upon their in-house BIOS teams. We have done that. We recently signed a new major sales agreement with our long term customer, Quanta, covering the use of our core system software, which for systems, as I speak, are all ready being shipped by one of the largest PC manufacturers in the world. We are particularly proud that through this initiative, we have enabled this manufacturer to rapidly adopt dual sourcing for processor technology and further enhance and differentiate their service offerings. | ||
We needed to update our product roadmap and reinvigorate our strategic partnerships across the industry to ensure a healthy and sustainable competitive position, and to reestablish Phoenix as the global leader in core system software design and development. We have done that. I am extremely pleased to report that our new product vision and overall technical architecture, which we have begun to share with the industry, has received very favorable reactions, not only from our prospective partners, but from very important customers as well. |
On other fronts, we have also begun to the reap the benefits of certain administrative improvements, we have introduced within Phoenix with the successful completion of our annual audit and the filing of a 10-K which reflects considerable enhancement in the overall quality of the companys internal controls. As you know, our Board of Directors has been undertaking a review of the companys strategic alternatives with the help of external advisors. This process has been detailed and extensive and has included reaching out to potential strategic and financial investors who might have interest in purchasing Phoenix. | ||
During this process, one of our largest investors, Ramius Capital and some of its associates were provided an opportunity, as were certain other parties to conduct due diligence investigations, in order to refine their offer to purchase the company. In the case of the Ramius group, these investigations included numerous meetings and discussions with the company, its advisors and management, thorough review of the companys internal, strategic and financial plans, and the examination of over 400 documents, which we provided to them under the terms of confidentiality agreements. | ||
Following these investigations, Ramius saw sufficient value in the companys future, to launch an increased bid to acquire the company at a price of $5.25 per share. After considering all relevant factors and taking input from the retained advisors, the Board of Directors of Phoenix, having completed its review of the strategic alternatives, rejected all offers to acquire the company, including the Ramius Capital groups proposal. In doing so, our board stated its belief in the companys potential to yield significantly more values to stockholders, than the Ramius proposed offer. Ramius has now nominated two candidates for election to the companys Board of Directors, seeking to replace our current chairman and an independent director, currently nominated by the board for reelection. |
The company will, today, be mailing proxy materials in connection with that election, which is scheduled for February 14. And we encourage you to review those materials and vote any eligible shares that you may hold. My team and I are eager to see an end to this expensive and disruptive process and to move on with our management efforts. We are confident that we will continue to execute on our plan successfully. And we believe that you, our stockholders, are poised to recognize the benefits of this plan. We hope you will give us the opportunity to continue working with the current board and its advisors to ensure favorable results for all shareholders, not just a single investor group. | ||
Last quarter, I mentioned our lack of confidence in the companys historic methods of revenue forecasting and our willingness to provide revenue guidance, until we had made some significant progress towards overcoming this weakness. We have done this. We are now comfortable stating that we expect greater than a 10 percent quarter-on-quarter revenue growth for our second fiscal quarter. For the full year, we expect substantial continued growth in the second half, and total annual revenue in excess of 50 million. We have previously stated that our expectation, that we would achieve a break even run rate by the end of this fiscal year. We now expect that we will achieve this target, somewhat earlier, and that we, therefore, hope to report better than breakeven results for the fourth fiscal quarter. | ||
So in summary, we have made very good progress over the last quarter. We feel we are completely on track with our turnaround plan for Phoenix and we are more confident than ever about all of the beliefs regarding the companys potential that we expressed on the last quarterly conference call. | ||
With that, I would like to open it up to questions-and-answers. Operator. | ||
Operator:
|
Thank you. The question-and-answer session will be conducted electronically. If you would like to ask a question, please do so by pressing the star key followed by the digit one on your |
touch-tone telephone. If you are using a speakerphone, please be sure your mute function has been turned off to allow your signal to reach our equipment. Once again, that is star one to pose a question. | ||
Well go to Eric Martinuzzi of Craig-Hallum | ||
Eric Martinuzzi:
|
Good morning. My question first has to do with the guidance; it looks like youre talking about 10.7 million, approximately, for Q2. Using the first half of the year, then, as 20 million starting point and your other comment about 50 million, that implies about 30 million in the back half of the year. How does that lay out? Is that is your expectations that thats kind of a linear progression, going from the 10.7, out to, you know, on average 15 million a quarter, but certainly ramping. | |
Richard Arnold:
|
Yes, good question, Eric. Youve got the numbers about right. This is Rich. The 30 in the back half is not quite linear. Theres a bit of a step function as the result of the termination of initial FPULS. So we get some of the benefit earlier. So I dont want to go too far down into detail, but your numbers for the two halves are correct. | |
Eric Martinuzzi:
|
OK. Secondly, the youve driven the services sales and obviously, you know, everybody would love to see them as a profitable part of your business. A two part question here, what are you doing to drive services/sales? And then, what are you doing to improve those margins? | |
Woody Hobbs:
|
Well the I think its just a matter of improving service quality. Theres plenty of demand out there, and we have to improve our productivity and we just we dont really have to worry more a bunch about sales at all. If we just get our productivity up and our pricing up to match the productivity and eliminate the non-billable time that comes from the lack of productivity well get there. Its just process and hard work. Theres no genius involved. |
Eric Martinuzzi:
|
But theres not a there hasnt been a new services being offered? Its monetizing previously provided services? | |
Woody Hobbs:
|
Thats correct. Thats right. Im not offering new services at this time. Were just trying to perfect what we previously offered and get paid for it. And to some extent, unbundled, you know, this started before we got here, but sort of unbundle the pricing for services, and licenses so that theyre separate and apart. | |
Eric Martinuzzi:
|
OK. And then, lastly, on the Microsoft launch of Vista, what impact have you seen from the enterprise launch and what do you expect from the consumer launch? | |
Woody Hobbs:
|
Well I think theres been a little impact. Certainly, its hard to imagine new computers being shipped, you know, with XP in them. I just dont think thats going to be the case much longer. And the bulk of the uptake in the market has been expected on the consumer side, not the enterprise side. Enterprises are just not going to convert that easily. Theyre both leery of the new releases, and they usually wait until the first service pack. And so, unless they have an immediate requirement for it, theyre not going to convert. So I think the consumer part will actually be better. There may be some backlog at the major OEMs winning for the consumer launch, but as you know, the consumer launch is next week, so well get going on that pretty quickly. | |
Eric Martinuzzi:
|
Thank you. | |
Operator:
|
Well go next to John Lynch of Needham. |
John Lynch:
|
Hi, guys. I was curious with regards to the cuts in sales and marketing, if you could give us a flavor of how much of that pertains to taking resources away from the defunct applications business, versus the core business. | |
Woody Hobbs:
|
In one way or another, I think it all relates to that. You know, we have a relatively small number of customers, that are easily managed with a relatively small sales staff, albeit high powered sales staff. And so the distributor network, on the other hand, was an expensive thing to support. So really, in one way or another, our sales reductions can be, almost all attributed to just reductions due to eliminating the distributor network. | |
Now, we do have a distributor network for our smaller core system sales, but Im talking about for the enterprise applications. | ||
John Lynch:
|
Sure. | |
Richard Arnold:
|
And then, on the marketing side, much of the marketing spend was also enterprise applications directed, although, you know, things like marketing research budgets and things like that, also got cut. | |
John Lynch:
|
Great. And then just my last question, if you could address your market share, and where youre at now, and kind of where you think thats going by any chance, with regards to the core business? | |
Woody Hobbs:
|
Well I think the its sort of working in our favor, because whats happening is a greater percentage of the PCs being shipped are mobile, and thats always been where weve commanded a larger market share. And so I think our market share is increasing, at the moment, where its not because weve introduced new hot products, although weve got them in the works, its more because were beneficiaries of the shift from desktop to mobile. |
John Lynch:
|
OK. Great. Thanks, guys, very much. | |
Operator:
|
And once again, that is star one if you would like to pose a question. Well go to Joan Tong of Sidoti and Company. | |
Joan Tong:
|
Good morning. Very good job at getting the expense down and a nice comeback again, on the top line. I just have a couple of questions here. You know, first off, Rich for the VPA booking numbers 16.7 million that I think you mentioned about, how much, you know, is being recognized for this quarter? | |
Richard Arnold:
|
So the let me just make sure that weve got all of the numbers correct here. | |
Joan Tong:
|
OK. | |
Richard Arnold:
|
You have three components that a given sales contract can generate. If we invoice it, it is either going to generate revenue in the current quarter meaning the first fiscal quarter. Or its going to go under the balance sheet as deferred revenue. | |
Joan Tong: |
OK. | |
Richard Arnold:
|
If we dont invoice it, its going to go into this unaccounted fall backlog. So the numbers are the revenue weve reported, plus the 5.2 million of deferred revenue remaining, thats all ready been invoiced but hasnt yet been taken to income. And the 16-point-something million that leaves us with 21 million of contracts in hand, that havent yet flowed through the revenue statement. |
So in the revenue statement in any given quarter, you will have some revenue that comes from sales activity in that quarter, some revenue that is pulled out of the old deferred revenue balance, and some revenue thats pulled out of the old unbooked balance. So our total sales activity for the quarter, is not a number that weve given in part because we havent given the detail of what came into this quarter out of prior backlogs. | ||
Joan Tong:
|
OK. All right, that answers my question, thank you. And also, maybe one question for like, you know, Woody. You know, Im just wondering, like for all of the VPAs that you signed this quarter, are there any low end (first) BIOS products, or theyre mostly just the core product? | |
Woody Hobbs:
|
No. We have a substantial amount of award BIOS still being sold. So we have not discontinued that product. We dont intend to discontinue it, and were getting good sales from it. | |
Joan Tong:
|
OK. And then, also it seems like to me, this is more like a recovery story. However, I just wonder, like if you can maybe talk about your growth prospects going forward? And, you know, just wondering if theres any growth prospect in the business, given that you have a very strong countering effect or maybe I should say headwind, a pricing drop, PC pricing drop, maybe or your average deal size or your price has been coming down, which I think thats the case. I just wonder like how are you going to grow like under this kind of environment going forward. | |
Woody Hobbs:
|
Right. Well I think that were going to grow by increasing function, increasing our capabilities. Weve got a new architecture that extends our stack substantially. It increases the value. Its very difficult to keep todays PC running in the complex environment, especially in the home and office networks. And weve got features coming up that match some of the new complex chip sets coming up from our competitors I mean from our partners, that will increase our ASPs significantly, and Im talking about potentially 100 percent. So thats the type of growth we want. |
We think we can, with this new architecture, not only increase our ASP substantially but also we can increase our market share at the same time. | ||
Joan Tong:
|
OK. And then, finally, Rich for that $15 million of operating expenses, is this a GAAP number that including option expense? | |
Richard Arnold:
|
Yes. Just for clarity, its the 15 million is the sum of cost of goods, and OPEX. And yes, it includes all of the non, all of the things that are normally pulled out of non GAAP. So it does include the 123R, equity compensation expense and it also includes any continuing payments on the restructuring costs that havent all ready been accrued. | |
Joan Tong:
|
OK. All right. Thank you so much. | |
Richard Arnold:
|
Thank you. | |
Operator:
|
And that does conclude todays question-and-answer session we thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect. |