Edgar Filing: IMAX CORP

e10vqza

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q/A

Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-Q


þ		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007


o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number 0-24216

IMAX Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Canada		98-0140269

(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)		Identification Number)


2525 Speakman Drive, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada		L5K 1B1

(Address of principal executive offices)		(Postal Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (905) 403-6500

N/A

(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer” and “large accelerated filer” in Rule 12B-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large Accelerated Filer o Accelerated Filer þ Non-Accelerated Filer o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes o No þ

Indicate the number of shares of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:


Class		Outstanding as of July 31, 2007

Common stock, no par value		40,288,074

IMAX CORPORATION

Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-Q

TABLE OF CONTENTS


		Page
PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Financial Statements		4

Item 2.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		47

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Factors about Market Risk		67

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures		68

PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings		71

Item 1A.	Risk Factors		73

Item 6.	Exhibits		73

Signatures			74
EX-31.1
EX-31.2
EX-31.3
EX-32.1
EX-32.2
EX-32.3

Page 2

IMAX CORPORATION

EXPLANATORY NOTE TO QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q/A

IMAX Corporation together with its wholly-owned subsidiaries (the “Company”) previously announced its intention to restate its consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2006, and the first six months of 2007. The Company files this Amendment No. 1 to its second quarter 2007 Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (this “Form 10-Q/A”), to reflect the correction of errors that were contained in the Company’s second quarter 2007 Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, originally filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on August 9, 2007, (the “Original 2007 Second Quarter Form 10-Q”). The Company also amends portions of its Original 2007 Second Quarter Form 10-Q in response to a comment letter received from the SEC. In this Form 10-Q/A, the Company has corrected certain errors with regard to its lease-related accounting practices as they related to the Company’s owned and operated theaters and office facilities, sponsorship revenue at its owned and operated theaters, corrected a revenue recognition error for a 2002 transaction, revised the presentation of discontinued operations in the consolidated statement of cash flows, enhanced disclosures relating to its credit facilities and revenue recognition accounting policies and updated the disclosure with respect to its legal proceedings. The Company is also updating Item 4. Controls and Procedures in connection with such changes.

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

Certain statements included in this quarterly report may constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, references to future capital expenditures (including the amount and nature thereof), business and technology strategies and measures to implement strategies, competitive strengths, goals, expansion and growth of business, operations and technology, plans and references to the future success of IMAX Corporation together with its wholly-owned subsidiaries (the “Company”) and expectations regarding the Company’s future operating results. These forward-looking statements are based on certain assumptions and analyses made by the Company in light of its experience and its perception of historical trends, current conditions and expected future developments, as well as other factors it believes are appropriate in the circumstances. However, whether actual results and developments will conform with the expectations and predictions of the Company is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, general economic, market or business conditions; the opportunities (or lack thereof) that may be presented to and pursued by the Company; competitive actions by other companies; U.S. or Canadian regulatory inquiries; conditions in the in-home and out-of-home entertainment industries; changes in laws or regulations; conditions, changes and developments in the commercial exhibition industry; the acceptance of the Company’s new technologies (including in particular its transition to digital projection technology); risks associated with investments and operations in foreign jurisdictions and any future international expansion, including those related to economic, political and regulatory policies of local governments and laws and policies of the United States and Canada; the potential impact of increased competition in the markets the Company operates within; and other factors, many of which are beyond the control of the Company. Consequently, all of the forward-looking statements made in this quarterly report are qualified by these cautionary statements, and actual results or anticipated developments by the Company may not be realized, and even if substantially realized, may not have the expected consequences to, or effects on, the Company. The Company undertakes no obligation to update publicly or otherwise revise any forward-looking information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

IMAX^®, IMAX^® Dome, IMAX^® 3D, IMAX^® 3D Dome, The IMAX Experience^®, An IMAX Experience^®,
IMAX DMR^®, DMR^®, IMAX MPX^®, IMAX think big^® and think big^® are trademarks and trade names of the
Company or its subsidiaries that are registered or otherwise protected under laws of various jurisdictions.

Page 3

IMAX CORPORATION

PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements


	Page
The following Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are filed as part of this Report:

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006		5

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006		6

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006		7

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements		8

Page 4

IMAX CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

In accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)


	June 30, 2007			December 31,
	(unaudited)			2006
	As restated			As restated
	(note 3)			(note 3)
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	16,310		$	25,123
Short-term investments		2,164			2,115
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $3,112 (2006 - $3,253)		26,354			26,017
Financing receivables (note 4)		62,792			65,878
Inventories (note 5)		27,122			26,913
Prepaid expenses		3,052			3,432
Film assets		4,178			1,235
Property, plant and equipment		24,734			24,639
Other assets		12,174			10,365
Goodwill		39,027			39,027
Other intangible assets		2,526			2,547

Total assets	$	220,433		$	227,291


Liabilities
Accounts payable	$	8,454		$	11,426
Accrued liabilities (notes 9(h),14(a), 17(a), 17(c))		61,574			58,294
Deferred revenue		60,205			55,803
Senior Notes due 2010 (note 6)		160,000			160,000

Total liabilities		290,233			285,523


Commitments and contingencies (notes 8 and 9)

Shareholders’ deficit
Capital stock (note 14) common shares – no par value. Authorized – unlimited number. Issued and outstanding – 40,288,074 (2006 – 40,285,574)		122,032			122,024
Other equity		3,400			2,937
Deficit		(195,742	)		(184,375	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income		510			1,182

Total shareholders’ deficit		(69,800	)		(58,232	)

Total liabilities and shareholders’ deficit	$	220,433		$	227,291

(the accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements)

Page 5

IMAX CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

In accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles

(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share amounts)

(unaudited)


	Three months ended						Six months ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2007			2006			2007			2006
	As restated			As restated			As restated			As restated
	(note 3)			(note 3)			(note 3)			(note 3)
Revenues
Equipment and product sales	$	6,781		$	15,322		$	13,855		$	23,096
Services		16,341			19,728			33,998			33,197
Rentals		1,672			1,485			2,958			2,464
Finance income		1,181			1,627			2,367			2,739
Other		1,539			—			1,539			—

		27,514			38,162			54,717			61,496
Cost of goods sold, services and rentals
Equipment and product sales		3,813			8,910			7,756			13,116
Services		10,698			13,084			21,990			23,745
Rentals		731			473			1,291			950
Other		19			—			19			—

		15,261			22,467			31,056			37,811

Gross margin		12,253			15,695			23,661			23,685

Selling, general and administrative expenses (note 10)		11,147			9,533			21,469			20,065
Research and development		1,121			664			2,616			1,579
Amortization of intangibles		141			132			277			324
Receivable provisions net of (recoveries) (note 12)		(31	)		(252	)		(25	)		(109	)

Earnings (loss) from operations		(125	)		5,618			(676	)		1,826

Interest income		227			280			453			533
Interest expense		(4,375	)		(4,242	)		(8,624	)		(8,399	)

Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes		(4,273	)		1,656			(8,847	)		(6,040	)
(Provision for) recovery of income taxes		(260	)		2			(427	)		1,694

Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations		(4,533	)		1,658			(9,274	)		(4,346	)
Net earnings from discontinued operations		—			—			—			2,300

Net earnings (loss)	$	(4,533	)	$	1,658		$	(9,274	)	$	(2,046	)


Earnings (loss) per share
Earnings (loss) per share – basic & diluted:
Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations	$	(0.11	)	$	0.04		$	(0.23	)	$	(0.10	)
Net earnings from discontinued operations	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	0.05

Net earnings (loss)	$	(0.11	)	$	0.04		$	(0.23	)	$	(0.05	)


Other comprehensive loss consists of:
Actuarial loss resulting from amendment (net of tax provision of $nil)	$	(997	)	$	—		$	(997	)	$	—
Amortization of prior service credits (net of tax provision of $73 and $nil for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and $149 and $nil for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively)		164			—			325			—

	$	(833	)	$	—		$	(672	)	$	—

(the accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements)

Page 6

IMAX CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

In accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

(unaudited)


	Six months ended
	June 30,
	2007			2006
	As restated			As restated
	(note 3)			(note 3)
Cash provided by (used in):

Operating Activities
Net loss	$	(9,274	)	$	(2,046	)
Net earnings from discontinued operations		—			(2,300	)
Items not involving cash:
Depreciation and amortization (note 11)		6,254			7,638
Write-downs (note 11)		(25	)		(109	)
Change in deferred income taxes		(149	)		(1,604	)
Stock and other non-cash compensation		2,006			2,554
Non-cash foreign exchange gain		(623	)		(405	)
Interest on short-term investments		(49	)		(179	)
Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance		(16	)		(6	)
Investment in film assets		(5,590	)		(5,696	)
Changes in other non-cash operating assets and liabilities (note 11)		2,227			(2,702	)
Net cash used in operating activities from discontinued operations		(775	)		—

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		(6,014	)		(4,855	)


Investing Activities
Purchases of short-term investments		(4,275	)		(10,322	)
Proceeds from maturities of short-term investments		4,274			10,321
Purchase of property, plant and equipment		(723	)		(739	)
Increase in other assets		(374	)		(566	)
Increase in other intangible assets		(256	)		(309	)
Net cash provided by investing activities from discontinued operations		—			3,493

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		(1,354	)		1,878


Financing Activities
Financing costs related to Senior Notes due 2010		(1,431	)		—
Common shares issued		8			286

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(1,423	)		286


Effects of exchange rate changes on cash		(22	)		(59	)


Decrease in cash and cash equivalents, during the period		(8,813	)		(2,750	)

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		25,123			24,324


Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	16,310		$	21,574

(the accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements)

Page 7

IMAX CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

In accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles

(Tabular amounts in thousands of U.S. dollars unless otherwise stated)

(unaudited)

Basis of Presentation

IMAX Corporation, together with its wholly-owned subsidiaries (the “Company”), reports its results under United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“U.S. GAAP”).

The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, except subsidiaries which the Company has identified as variable interest entities (“VIEs”) where the Company is not the primary beneficiary. The nature of the Company’s business is such that the results of operations for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the fiscal year. In the opinion of management, the information contained herein reflects all adjustments necessary to make the results of operations for the interim periods a fair statement of such operations.

The Company has evaluated its various variable interests to determine whether they are VIEs in accordance with Financial Accounting Standard Board (“FASB”) Interpretation No. 46R, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities” (“FIN 46R”). The Company has six film production companies that are VIEs. As the Company is exposed to the majority of the expected losses for one of the film production companies, the Company has determined that it is the primary beneficiary of this entity. The Company continues to consolidate this entity, with no material impact on the operating results or financial condition of the Company, as this production company has total assets and total liabilities of $nil as at June 30, 2007 (December 31, 2006 — $nil). For the other five film production companies which are VIEs, however, the Company did not consolidate these film entities since it does not bear the majority of the expected losses or expected residual returns. The Company equity accounts for these entities. As of June 30, 2007, these five VIEs have total assets of $0.4 million (December 31, 2006 — $0.4 million) and total liabilities of $0.4 million (December 31, 2006 — $0.4 million).

All significant intercompany accounts and transactions, including all intercompany profits on transactions with equity-accounted investees, have been eliminated.

These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements included in the Company’s Amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the “2006 Form 10-K/A”) which should be consulted for a summary of the significant accounting policies utilized by the Company. These interim financial statements are prepared following accounting policies consistent with the Company’s financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2006, except as noted below.

Change in Accounting Policy

Income Taxes

In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109), (“FIN 48”). This interpretation prescribes a more likely than not recognition threshold and a measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provided guidance on derecognition of a tax position, classification of a liability for unrecognized tax benefits, accounting or interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, and expanded income tax disclosures. FIN 48 was effective for the Company on January 1, 2007. The cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle recorded in the first quarter of 2007 upon adoption of FIN 48 was an increase to accrued liabilities of $2.1 million and a charge to opening deficit. For additional information see note 13.

Page 8

IMAX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
In accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
(Tabular amounts in thousands of U.S. dollars unless otherwise stated)
(unaudited)

Restatement of Previously Issued Financial Statements

As a result of certain transactions occurring during the 2007 fiscal year, the Company identified certain errors related to operating leases for its facilities and sponsorship revenues associated with its owned and operated theaters. In addition, the Company identified an error relating to revenue recognition, resulting from the Company’s review of one theater system arrangement which occurred in 2002 in response to comments received from the Staff of the Division of Corporate Finance of the SEC. As a result, the previously issued consolidated financial statements as at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 and for the three and six months ended June 2007 and 2006, have been restated (the “Second Restatement”). The previously issued consolidated financial statements included in the Original 2007 Second Quarter Form 10-Q, filed on August 9, 2007, had included restatements related to the consolidated financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 (the “First Restatement”).

First Restatement

In 2006, the Company effected a restatement of its prior period financial results due to discovery of certain errors related to: (a) revenue recognition resulting from the Company’s review of its theater system arrangements over the 5 year period ended December 31, 2006 in response to comments received from the staff of both the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and the Ontario Securities Commission (“OSC”) which indicated insufficient analysis of various sales and lease transactions and the accounting effect of certain contractual provisions within them; and misallocations of consideration to elements within certain multiple element arrangements; (b) capitalization of costs into inventory and film assets and amortization of film assets in accordance with American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Statement of Position 00-2, “Accounting by Producers or Distributors of Films” (“SOP 00-2”); (c) income tax liabilities resulting from failure to make certain tax elections on a timely basis and (d) certain other items described under Other Adjustments in this note. In addition, in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company recorded other adjustments related to prior periods’ unadjusted differences that had been deemed not to be material and adjustments related to prior periods recorded through the 2006 opening shareholders’ deficit.

Second Restatement

In October 2007, the Company announced that, after a review of its real estate leases, it had identified certain errors related to its accounting practices as they relate to such leases for certain of the Company’s owned and operated theaters and office facilities. The Company conducted this review after performing an analysis of a rent-abatement initiated in connection with the higher level of Finance Department oversight and awareness contemplated by the company’s ongoing remediation plan (see Item 4). The review focused on the Company’s historical accounting practice for recording the impact of rent holidays, abatements, escalation clauses and landlord construction allowances. The Company also reviewed its accounting for theater sponsorship revenue at its owned and operated theaters. As a result of this review, the Company concluded that certain of its prior practices were not in accordance with U.S. GAAP and the Company has restated its consolidated financial statements for prior periods. Information on the restatement of the consolidated balance sheet for the year ended December 31, 2006 is included in the 2006 Form 10-K/A. The overall net impact of these restatement errors was an increase of $5.7 million in June 30, 2007 closing deficit.

Furthermore, the Company identified an error relating to the classification of a theater system arrangement. The arrangement was originally treated as a sale with contingent minimums however, after further review of significant terms in the agreement it was determined that the arrangement should have been treated as an operating lease, the correction of which increased the June 30, 2007 closing deficit by $0.4 million.

Page 9

3.		Restatement of Previously Issued Financial Statements (cont’d)

c)		Impact of the First Restatement

Revenue Recognition — Theater Systems

The Company’s revenue arrangements include multiple elements. In prior years, the Company considered each component of its theater systems to be a separate element. As a result, revenue was recognized when certain components were installed. As part of the review of its revenue recognition policy, the Company concluded its policy for revenue recognition on theater systems should be revised to treat all components of the theater system (including the projector, sound system, and screen system and, if applicable, 3D glasses cleaning machine), theater design support, supervision of installation, projectionist training and the use of that IMAX brand as a single deliverable and a single unit of accounting, (the “System Deliverable”). In addition, the Company revised its policy to recognize revenue only when all of the following conditions have been met: (i) the projector, sound system and screen system have been installed and are in full working condition, (ii) the 3D glasses cleaning machine, if applicable, has been delivered, (iii) projectionist training has been completed and (iv) the earlier of (a) receipt of written customer acceptance certifying the completion of installation and run-in testing of the equipment and the completion of projection training or (b) public opening of the theater. In conjunction with these changes, the Company undertook an extensive review of all of its revenue arrangements for theater systems for the period from 2002 to 2006.

For the three months ended June 30, 2006 (as restated), three transactions which were originally recorded in 2005 (revenue and net earnings impact of $5.8 million and $3.1 million, respectively) and one transaction which was originally recorded in the first quarter of 2006 (revenue and net earnings impact of $1.8 million and $0.4 million, respectively) were moved to the second quarter of 2006. Six transactions which were originally recorded in the second quarter of 2006 (revenue and net earnings impact of $8.4 million and $5.0 million, respectively) were moved to the third quarter of 2006; and, one transaction (revenue and net earnings impact of $1.7 million and $0.6 million, respectively) was moved to the second quarter of 2007. The net impact of these adjustments was a decrease in revenue and net earnings of $2.7 million and $2.2 million, respectively, for the quarter ended June 30, 2006.

For the six months ended June 30, 2006 (as restated), six transactions which were originally recorded in 2005 (revenue and net earnings impact of $11.1 million and $5.7 million, respectively) were moved to the six month period ended June 30, 2006. Six transactions which were originally recorded in the six months period ended June 30, 2006 (revenue and net earnings impact of $10.1 million and $5.6 million, respectively) were moved to later periods: five transactions (revenue and net earnings impact of $8.4 million and $5.0 million, respectively) were moved to the third quarter of 2006 and one transaction (revenue and net earnings impact of $1.7 million and $0.6 million, respectively) was moved to the second quarter of 2007. The net impact of these adjustments was an increase in revenue of $0.6 million and a decrease in net earnings of less than $0.1 million for the six month period ended June 30, 2006.

Page 10

3.		Restatement of Previously Issued Financial Statements (cont’d)

c)		Impact of the First Restatement (cont’d)

Revenue Recognition — Other

As a result of the review of the revenue arrangements, the Company identified additional errors including the following:

	§		Based on an analysis of fair values of elements within its arrangements, the Company determined that the allocations of consideration received and receivable to elements of multiple element arrangements were not updated to reflect the current fair values of particular elements, in particular fair values of maintenance and extended warranty services in the period affected were not updated in accordance with the accounting guidance in Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue 00-21 and other applicable standards. This affected allocations of consideration in various arrangements to the System Deliverable, maintenance and extended warranty services, 3D glasses and film license credits. In addition, in certain arrangements, settlement income was adjusted to reflect the residual amount based on other elements being reflected at their fair values.

	§		The existence of certain non-standard contractual provisions resulted in: the reclassification of certain sales arrangements to sales-type lease transactions, for accounting purposes when the customer was not granted title to the system until all payments were made and certain sales-type leases to operating leases given substantially all of the benefits and risks of ownership had not passed to the customer; and the timing of recognition of the minimum annual payments under certain arrangements.

	§		Finance income continued to be recognized when the related financing receivables were impaired. The Company has corrected the error by discontinuing the recognition of finance income until the impairment issues were resolved.

The impact of these adjustments was a decrease to net earnings by $0.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006 and an increase to net loss of $0.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006.

Inventory Costs

During the period from 2001 to 2006, the Company paid certain fees to a professional services firm to assist the Company in identifying sales opportunities and provide assistance in negotiating and concluding contracts in the developing Asian market. These fees were capitalized and allocated to theater systems inventory for various Asian customers. The Company has determined that these fees were promotional and selling expenses which should have been expensed as incurred as the costs were not direct and incremental costs to a contract. The impact of the adjustments was a decrease to net earnings of $0.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006 and an increase to net loss of $0.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006.

Page 11

3.		Restatement of Previously Issued Financial Statements (cont’d)

c)		Impact of the First Restatement (cont’d)

Film Accounting

The Company has determined that it had misclassified certain costs incurred in respect of co-produced film productions between 2004 and the third quarter of 2006. Marketing and advertising costs were co-mingled with film production costs, and both were capitalized to film assets, and subsequently amortized into the income statement over the estimated total ultimate revenues associated with the film productions. Film exploitation costs, which include marketing and advertising costs, as defined in SOP 00-2, should have been expensed in the period incurred and not capitalized to film assets. In addition, certain costs were accrued by the Company prior to being incurred. These costs have been moved to the period they were incurred. On certain co-produced film productions, the Company received production fees which should have been deferred and recognized over the film ultimates. These production fees were previously recognized when production of the film was complete. The Company also determined that it had not appropriately applied the individual-film-forecast computation method when it amortized its film assets and deferred production fees and accrued its participation liabilities for the periods between 2002 and the third quarter of 2006. SOP 00-2 requires changes in estimates of ultimate revenues used in the individual-film-forecast computation method to be adjusted prospectively from the beginning of the year of the change. The Company had applied changes in estimates on a retroactive basis from the original release date. In addition, the Company adjusted its amortization of prepaid print costs. The impact of the adjustments was an increase to net earnings of $0.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006 and an increase to net loss of $0.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006.

Branch Level Interest Taxes

The Company did not properly account for tax liabilities for branch level interest tax. For the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, the Company failed to make timely tax elections that would have prevented an allocation of the Company’s interest expense on its long-term indebtedness to the Company’s U.S. branch income tax returns. In 2006, the Company was assessed branch level interest taxes, interest and penalties due to the fact that these tax elections were not filed on a timely basis. The Company has determined that an accrued liability for the tax obligations should have been recorded at the time elections should have been filed and the taxes were due to be paid, which was in the third quarter of each of the years ended December 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005. The impact of the adjustments was an increase to net earnings of $0.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006 and a decrease to net loss of $0.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006.

Other Adjustments

During the preparation of executive compensation information for the 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K, the Company determined that the two Co-Chief Executive Officers (“Co-CEOs”) were entitled to postretirement health benefits since 2000 for which the obligation had not been included in the prior financial statements as required under SFAS No. 106, “Employer’s Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other than Pensions”. As a result the Company should have accrued $0.2 million in 2000. SG&A has been increased by less than $0.1 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006.

Page 12

3.		Restatement of Previously Issued Financial Statements (cont’d)

c)		Impact of the First Restatement (cont’d)

The following table presents the impact of the First Restatement on the Company’s previously issued consolidated statements of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2006:


																						As
																						Restated
				Revenue												Branch						Per
	As			Recognition-			Revenue									Level						Original
	Previously			Theater			Recognition-			Inventory			Film			Interest			Other			2007
	Reported⁽¹⁾			Systems			Other			Costs			Accounting			Taxes			Adjustments			Form 10-Q
Revenues
Equipment and product sales	$	18,548		$	(2,605	)	$	(585	)	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	15,358
Services		19,837			—			317			—			(446	)		—			—			19,708
Rentals		1,354			—			62			—			—			—			—			1,416
Finance income		1,659			(50	)		18			—			—			—			—			1,627

		41,398			(2,655	)		(188	)		—			(446	)		—			—			38,109
Costs of goods sold, services and rentals
Equipment and product sales		9,413			(503	)		—			—			—			—			—			8,910
Services		13,685			(2	)		7			—			(640	)		—			—			13,050
Rentals		440			—			21			—			—			—			—			461

		23,538			(505	)		28			—			(640	)		—			—			22,421

Gross margin		17,860			(2,150	)		(216	)		—			194			—			—			15,688

Selling, general and administrative expenses		9,451			31			—			69			—			—			3			9,554
Research and development		664			—			—			—			—			—			—			664
Amortization of intangibles		132			—			—			—			—			—			—			132
Receivable provisions net of (recoveries)		(252	)		—			—			—			—			—			—			(252	)

Earnings (loss) from operations		7,865			(2,181	)		(216	)		(69	)		194			—			(3	)		5,590

Interest income		280			—			—			—			—			—			—			280
Interest expense		(4,231	)		—			—			—			—			(11	)		—			(4,242	)

Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes		3,914			(2,181	)		(216	)		(69	)		194			(11	)		(3	)		1,628
Recovery of (provision for) income taxes		(380	)		—			—			—			—			382			—			2

Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations		3,534			(2,181	)		(216	)		(69	)		194			371			(3	)		1,630
Net earnings from discontinued operations		—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—

Net earnings (loss)	$	3,534		$	(2,181	)	$	(216	)	$	(69	)	$	194		$	371		$	(3	)	$	1,630


Earnings (loss) per share
Earnings (loss) per share — basic:
Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations	$	0.09		$	(0.05	)	$	(0.01	)	$	—		$	—		$	0.01		$	—		$	0.04
Net earnings from discontinued operations	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—

Net (loss) earnings	$	0.09		$	(0.05	)	$	(0.01	)	$	—		$	—		$	0.01		$	—		$	0.04

Earnings (loss) per share — diluted:
Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations	$	0.08		$	(0.05	)	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	0.01		$	—		$	0.04
Net earnings from discontinued operations	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—

Net earnings (loss)	$	0.08		$	(0.05	)	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	0.01		$	—		$	0.04


(1)		The Company has changed the presentation of revenues and cost of goods sold, services and rentals to conform to the presentation requirements specified in Regulation S-X of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Page 13

3.		Restatement of Previously Issued Financial Statements (cont’d)

c)		Impact of the First Restatement (cont’d)

The following table presents the impact of the First Restatement on the Company’s previously issued consolidated statements of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2006:


																					As
																					Restated
				Revenue												Branch					Per
	As			Recognition-			Revenue									Level					Original
	Previously			Theater			Recognition-			Inventory			Film			Interest		Other			2007
	Reported⁽¹⁾			Systems			Other			Costs			Accounting			Taxes		Adjustments			Form 10-Q
Revenues
Equipment and product sales	$	23,227		$	710		$	(759	)	$	—		$	—		$	—	$	—		$	23,178
Services		33,545			—			560			—			(963	)		—		—			33,142
Rentals		2,208			—			107			—			—			—		—			2,315
Finance income		2,836			(131	)		34			—			—			—		—			2,739

		61,816			579			(58	)		—			(963	)		—		—			61,374
Costs of goods sold, services and rentals
Equipment and product sales		12,534			582			—			—			—			—		—			13,116
Services		24,514			12			7			—			(865	)		—		—			23,667
Rentals		883			—			42			—			—			—		—			926

		37,931			594			49			—			(865	)		—		—			37,709

Gross margin		23,885			(15	)		(107	)		—			(98	)		—		—			23,665

Selling, general and administrative expenses		19,956			31			—			114			—			—		6			20,107
Research and development		1,579			—			—			—			—			—		—			1,579
Amortization of intangibles		324			—			—			—			—			—		—			324
Receivable provisions net of (recoveries)		(109	)		—			—			—			—			—		—			(109	)

Earnings (loss) from operations		2,135			(46	)		(107	)		(114	)		(98	)		—		(6	)		1,764

Interest income		533			—			—			—			—			—		—			533
Interest expense		(8,405	)		—			—			—			—			6		—			(8,399	)

Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes		(5,737	)		(46	)		(107	)		(114	)		(98	)		6		(6	)		(6,102	)
Recovery of income taxes		1,150			—			—			—			—			544		—			1,694

Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations		(4,587	)		(46	)		(107	)		(114	)		(98	)		550		(6	)		(4,408	)
Net earnings from discontinued operations		2,300			—			—			—			—			—		—			2,300

Net earnings (loss)	$	(2,287	)	$	(46	)	$	(107	)	$	(114	)	$	(98	)	$	550	$	(6	)	$	(2,108	)


Earnings (loss) per share
Earnings (loss) per share — basic and diluted:
Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations	$	(0.11	)	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	0.01	$	—		$	(0.10	)
Net earnings from discontinued operations	$	0.05		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—	$	—		$	0.05

Net (loss) earnings	$	(0.06	)	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	0.01	$	—		$	(0.05	)


(1)		The Company has changed the presentation of revenues and cost of goods sold, services and rentals to conform to the presentation requirements specified in Regulation S-X of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Page 14

3.		Restatement of Previously Issued Financial Statements (cont’d)

d)		Impact of the Second Restatement

		Operating Leases

		FASB Statement No. 13, “Accounting for Leases” (“SFAS 13”), and related interpretations require that rent expense related to operating leases be recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease commencing when a lessee takes possession of or controls the use of the space. In addition, FASB Technical Bulletin 88-1, “Issues Related to Accounting for Leases”, requires lease incentives, such as landlord construction allowances received to defray construction costs incurred by the Company, be reflected as a deferred lease incentive, amortized over the lease term as a reduction to rent expense. Previously, the Company had recognized certain rent reductions and escalation clauses based on cash payments beginning from the date of occupancy or lease commencement date, which had the effect of excluding any rent expense during the build-out period. In addition, in certain cases, the Company had not recorded landlord construction allowances as a deferred lease incentive. The Company has restated the current and prior periods’ consolidated financial statements to recognize net rent expense on a straight-line basis over the period from the date the Company obtains possession and control of the property to the end of the lease term. Net rent expense includes payments as required under the lease adjusted for rent holidays, abatements, escalation clauses and construction allowances. In addition, the Company adjusted depreciation and impairment charges to reflect the full cost of the leaseholds acquired. The net impact of these restatement errors on net earnings was a nominal reduction in the loss for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006.

		Sponsorship Revenue

		The Company also determined the accounting for theater sponsorship revenue should have been recognized on a straight-line basis over the contractual period of the sponsorship. Previously, the Company recorded these revenues based on cash collections. The net impact of these restatement errors was a nominal reduction in the loss for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006.

		Revenue Recognition

		The Company also determined that one theater system revenue transaction had been classified as a sale with contingent minimums, which should have been classified as an operating lease. The Company reached this conclusion after consideration of EITF Issue No. 95-1, “Revenue Recognition on Sales with Guaranteed Minimum Resale Value,” and SFAS 13, since the arrangement contained an option, exercisable by the customer, requiring the Company to repurchase the theater system equipment for a fixed amount under certain conditions. The net impact of this restatement errors was a nominal reduction in the loss for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006.

Page 15

3.		Restatement of Previously Issued Financial Statements (cont’d)

d)		Impact of the Second Restatement (cont’d)

		The following table presents the impact of the Second Restatement on the Company’s previously issued consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2007:


	As Previously
	Reported Per			Second Restatement
	Original			Real Estate									As Restated
	2007			Operating			Sponsorship			Revenue			Per 2007
	Form 10-Q			Leases			Revenue			Recognition			Form 10-Q/A
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	16,310		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	16,310
Short-term investments		2,164			—			—			—			2,164
Accounts Receivable		26,354			—			—			—			26,354
Financing receivables		62,792			—			—			—			62,792
Inventories		27,122			—			—			—			27,122
Prepaid expenses		3,052			—			—			—			3,052
Film assets		4,178			—			—			—			4,178
Property, plant and equipment		24,507			—			—			227			24,734
Other assets		12,174			—			—			—			12,174
Goodwill		39,027			—			—			—			39,027
Other intangible assets		2,526			—			—			—			2,526

Total assets	$	220,206		$	—		$	—		$	227		$	$220,433


Liabilities
Accounts payable	$	8,454		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	8,454
Accrued liabilities		54,454			7,120			—			—			61,574
Deferred revenue		61,074			(1,552	)		33			650			60,205
Senior Notes due 2010		160,000			—			—			—			160,000

Total liabilities	$	283,982		$	5,568		$	33		$	650		$	290,233


Shareholders’ deficit
Capital Stock		122,032			—			—			—			122,032
Other equity		3,400			—			—			—			3,400
Deficit		(189,718	)		(5,568	)		(33	)		(423	)		(195,742	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income		510			—			—			—			510

Total shareholders’ deficit		(63,776	)		(5,568	)		(33	)		(423	)		(69,800	)

Total liabilities and shareholders’ deficit	$	220,206		$	—		$	—		$	227		$	220,433

Page 16

3.		Restatement of Previously Issued Financial Statements (cont’d)

d)		Impact of the Second Restatement (cont’d)

		The following table presents the impact of the Second Restatement on the Company’s previously issued consolidated statements of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2007:


	As Previously
	Reported Per			Second Restatement
	Original			Real Estate								As Restated
	2007			Operating			Sponsorship		Revenue			Per 2007
	Form 10-Q			Leases			Revenue		Recognition			Form 10-Q/A
Revenues
Equipment and product sales	$	6,813		$	—		$	—	$	(32	)	$	6,781
Services		16,329			—			12		—			16,341
Rentals		1,607			—			—		65			1,672
Finance income		1,181			—			—		—			1,181
Other		1,539			—			—		—			1,539

		27,469			—			12		33			27,514

Cost of goods sold, services and rentals
Equipment and product sales		3,813			—			—		—			3,813
Services		10,682			16			—		—			10,698
Rentals		719			—			—		12			731
Other		19			—			—		—			19

		15,233			16			—		12			15,261

Gross margin		12,236			(16	)		12		21			12,253

Selling, general and administrative expenses		11,168			(21	)		—		—			11,147
Research and development		1,121			—			—		—			1,121
Amortization of intangibles		141			—			—		—			141
Receivable provisions net of (recoveries)		(31	)		—			—		—			(31	)

Earnings (loss) from operations		(163	)		5			12		21			(125	)

Interest income		227			—			—		—			227
Interest expense		(4,375	)		—			—		—			(4,375	)

Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes		(4,311	)		5			12		21			(4,273	)
Provision for income taxes		(260	)		—			—		—			(260	)

Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations		(4,571	)		5			12		21			(4,533	)
Net earnings from discontinued operations		—			—			—		—			—

Net earnings (loss)	$	(4,571	)	$	5		$	12	$	21		$	(4,533	)


Earnings (loss) per share
Earnings (loss) per share – basic & diluted:
Net loss from continuing operations	$	(0.11	)	$	—		$	—	$	—		$	(0.11	)
Net earnings from discontinued operations	$	—		$	—		$	—	$	—		$	—

Net loss	$	(0.11	)	$	—		$	—	$	—		$	(0.11	)

Page 17

3.		Restatement of Previously Issued Financial Statements (cont’d)

d)		Impact of the Second Restatement (cont’d)

		The following table presents the impact of the Second Restatement on the Company’s previously issued consolidated statements of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2007:


	As Previously
	Reported Per			Second Restatement
	Original			Real Estate								As Restated
	2007			Operating			Sponsorship		Revenue			Per 2007
	Form 10-Q			Leases			Revenue		Recognition			Form 10-Q/A
Revenues
Equipment and product sales	$	13,918		$	—		$	—	$	(63	)	$	13,855
Services		33,974			—			24		—			33,998
Rentals		2,828			—			—		130			2,958
Finance income		2,367			—			—		—			2,367
Other		1,539			—			—		—			1,539

		54,626			—			24		67			54,717

Cost of goods sold, services and rentals
Equipment and product sales		7,756			—			—		—			7,756
Services		21,958			32			—		—			21,990
Rentals		1,268			—			—		23			1,291
Other		19			—			—		—			19

		31,001			32			—		23			31,056

Gross margin		23,625			(32	)		24		44			23,661

Selling, general and administrative expenses		21,510			(41	)		—		—			21,469
Research and development		2,616			—			—		—			2,616
Amortization of intangibles		277			—			—		—			277
Receivable provisions net of (recoveries)		(25	)		—			—		—			(25	)

Earnings (loss) from operations		(753	)		9			24		44			(676	)

Interest income		453			—			—		—			453
Interest expense		(8,624	)		—			—		—			(8,624	)

Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes		(8,924	)		9			24		44			(8,847	)
Provision for income taxes		(427	)		—			—		—			(427	)

Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations		(9,351	)		9			24		44			(9,274	)
Net earnings from discontinued operations		—			—			—		—			—

Net earnings (loss)	$	(9,351	)	$	9		$	24	$	44		$	(9,274	)


Earnings (loss) per share
Earnings (loss) per share – basic & diluted:
Net loss from continuing operations	$	(0.23	)	$	—		$	—	$	—		$	(0.23	)
Net earnings from discontinued operations	$	—		$	—		$	—	$	—		$	—

Net loss	$	(0.23	)	$	—		$	—	$	—		$	(0.23	)

Page 18

3.		Restatement of Previously Issued Financial Statements (cont’d)

d)		Impact of the Second Restatement (cont’d)

		*Restated Statement of Operations for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2006*

		The following table presents the impact of the Second Restatement on the Company’s previously issued consolidated statements of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2006:


	As Restated
	Reported Per			Second Restatement
	Original			Real Estate								As Restated
	2007			Operating			Sponsorship		Revenue			Per 2007
	Form 10-Q			Leases			Revenue		Recognition			Form 10-Q/A
Revenues
Equipment and product sales	$	15,358		$	—		$	—	$	(36	)	$	15,322
Services		19,708			—			20		—			19,728
Rentals		1,416			—			—		69			1,485
Finance income		1,627			—			—		—			1,627

		38,109			—			20		33			38,162

Costs of goods sold, services and rentals
Equipment and product sales		8,910			—			—		—			8,910
Services		13,050			34			—		—			13,084
Rentals		461			—			—		12			473

		22,421			34			—		12			22,467

Gross margin		15,688			(34	)		20		21			15,695

Selling, general and administrative expenses		9,554			(21	)		—		—			9,533
Research and development		664			—			—		—			664
Amortization of intangibles		132			—			—		—			132
Receivable provisions net of (recoveries)		(252	)		—			—		—			(252	)

Earnings (loss) from operations		5,590			(13	)		20		21			5,618

Interest income		280			—			—		—			280
Interest expense		(4,242	)		—			—		—			(4,242	)


Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
		1,628			(13	)		20		21			1,656
Recovery of (provision for) income taxes		2			—			—		—			2


Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations		1,630			(13	)		20		21			1,658
Net earnings from discontinued operations		—			—			—		—			—

Net earnings (loss)	$	1,630		$	(13	)	$	20	$	21		$	1,658


Earnings (loss) per share
Earnings (loss) per share – basic & diluted:
Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations	$	0.04		$	—		$	—	$	—		$	0.04
Net earnings from discontinued operations	$	—		$	—		$	—	$	—		$	—

Net earnings (loss)	$	0.04		$	—		$	—	$	—		$	0.04

Page 19

3.		Restatement of Previously Issued Financial Statements (cont’d)

d)		Impact of the Second Restatement (cont’d)

		*Restated Statement of Operations for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2006*

		The following table presents the impact of the Second Restatement on the Company’s previously issued consolidated statements of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2006:


	As Restated
	Reported Per			Second Restatement
	Original			Real Estate								As Restated
	2007			Operating			Sponsorship		Revenue			Per 2007
	Form 10-Q			Leases			Revenue		Recognition			Form 10-Q/A
Revenues
Equipment and product sales	$	23,178		$	—		$	—	$	(82	)	$	23,096
Services		33,142			—			55		—			33,197
Rentals		2,315			—			—		149			2,464
Finance income		2,739			—			—		—			2,739

		61,374			—			55		67			61,496

Costs of goods sold, services and rentals
Equipment and product sales		13,116			—			—		—			13,116
Services		23,667			78			—		—			23,745
Rentals		926			—			—		24			950

		37,709			78			—		24			37,811

Gross margin		23,665			(78	)		55		43			23,685

Selling, general and administrative expenses		20,107			(42	)		—		—			20,065
Research and development		1,579			—			—		—			1,579
Amortization of intangibles		324			—			—		—			324
Receivable provisions net of (recoveries)		(109	)		—			—		—			(109	)

Earnings (loss) from operations		1,764			(36	)		55		43			1,826

Interest income		533			—			—		—			533
Interest expense		(8,399	)		—			—		—			(8,399	)


Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes		(6,102	)		(36	)		55		43			(6,040	)
Recovery of income taxes		1,694			—			—		—			1,694


Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations		(4,408	)		(36	)		55		43			(4,346	)
Net earnings from discontinued operations		2,300			—			—		—			2,300

Net earnings (loss)	$	(2,108	)	$	(36	)	$	55	$	43		$	(2,046	)


Earnings (loss) per share
Earnings (loss) per share – basic and diluted:
Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations	$	(0.10	)	$	—		$	—	$	—		$	(0.10	)
Net earnings from discontinued operations		0.05		$	—		$	—	$	—		$	0.05

Net (loss) earnings	$	(0.05	)	$	—		$	—	$	—		$	(0.05	)

Page 20

3.		Restatement of Previously Issued Financial Statements (cont’d)

e)		Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

		As part of the Second Restatement, the Company changed the presentation of cash flows from discontinued operations to include cash flows related to operating and investing activities within those respective categories. Previously, the Company presented these cash flows on a net basis as a single caption within the statement of cash flows.

		There were no other errors in the cash flow statements for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 other than conforming changes to the components of the reconciliation to net cash provided by or used in operating activities related to the restatement adjustments described above.

4.		Financing Receivables

		Financing receivables, consisting of net investment in leases and receivables from financed sales of its theater systems, are as follows:


	June 30,			December 31,
	2007			2006
	As restated			As restated
Gross minimum lease amounts receivable	$	83,384		$	89,343
Residual value of equipment		321			368
Unearned finance income		(27,970	)		(31,182	)

Present value of minimum lease amounts receivable		55,735			58,529
Accumulated allowance for uncollectible amounts		(2,720	)		(2,445	)

Net investment in leases		53,015			56,084


Gross receivables from financed sales		14,266			14,268
Unearned income		(4,489	)		(4,474	)

Present value of financed sale receivables		9,777			9,794

Total financing receivables	$	62,792		$	65,878


Present value of financed sale receivables due within one year	$	2,631		$	1,886
Present value of financed sale receivables due after one year	$	7,146		$	7,908

		As at March 31, 2007 the financed sale receivables had a weighted average effective interest rate of 9.3% (December 31, 2006 – 8.3%).

5.		Inventories


	June 30,		December 31,
	2007		2006
	As restated		As restated
Raw materials	$	10,672	$	11,504
Work-in-process		2,791		2,677
Finished goods		13,659		12,732

	$	27,122	$	26,913

Page 21

6.		Senior Notes due 2010

		As at June 30, 2007, the Company had outstanding $159.0 million aggregate principal of Registered Senior Notes and $1.0 million aggregate principal of Unregistered Senior Notes. The Registered Senior Notes and the Unregistered Senior Notes are referred to herein as the “Senior Notes”.

		The terms of the Company’s Senior Notes impose certain restrictions on its operating and financing activities, including certain restrictions on the Company’s ability to: incur certain additional indebtedness; make certain distributions or certain other restricted payments; grant liens; create certain dividend and other payment restrictions affecting the Company’s subsidiaries; sell certain assets or merge with or into other companies; and enter into certain transactions with affiliates.

		In addition, the terms of the Company’s Senior Notes require that annual and quarterly financial statements are filed with the Trustee within 15 days of the required public company filing deadlines. If these financial reporting covenants are breached then this is considered an event of default under the terms of the Senior Notes and the Company has 30 days to cure this default, after which the Senior Notes become due and payable.

		In March 2007, the Company delayed the filing of its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 beyond the required public company filing deadline due to the discovery of certain accounting errors, broadened its accounting review to include certain other accounting matters based on comments received by the Company from the SEC and OSC, and ultimately restated financial statements for certain periods during those years. The filing delay resulted in the Company being in default of a financial reporting covenant under the indenture dated as of December 4, 2003, and as thereafter amended and supplemented, governing the Company’s Senior Notes due 2010 (the “Indenture”).

		On April 16, 2007 the Company completed a consent solicitation, receiving consents from holders of approximate 60% aggregate principal amount of the Senior Notes (the “Consenting Holders”) to execute a ninth supplemental indenture (the “Supplemental Indenture”) to the Indenture with the Guarantors named therein and U.S. Bank National Association. The Supplemental Indenture waived any defaults existing at such time arising from a failure by the Company to comply with the reporting covenant and extended until May 31, 2007, or at the Company’s election until June 30, 2007 (the “Covenant Reversion Date”), the date by which the Company’s failure to comply with the reporting covenant shall constitute a default, or be the basis for an event of default under the Indenture. The Company paid consent fees of $1.0 million to the Consenting Holders. On May 30, 2007, the Company provided notice to the holders of the Senior Notes of its election to extend the Covenant Reversion Date to June 30, 2007. The Company paid additional consent fees of $0.4 million to the Consenting Holders. In accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force Abstract 96-16 “Debtor’s Accounting for a Modification or Exchange of Debt Instruments”, the Company concluded that the payment of these fees did not result in an extinguishment of the debt and accordingly has capitalized these costs as deferred financing costs and is amortizing them, utilizing the effective interest method, as an adjustment of interest expense over the remaining term of the Senior Notes. Because the Company did not file its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 and its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 by June 30, 2007, it was in default of the reporting covenant under the Indenture on July 1, 2007, and received notice of such default on July 2, 2007. The Company cured such default under the Indenture by filing its 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K and first quarter 2007 Form 10-Q on July 20, 2007. See note 9(f) for more information.

Page 22

7.		Credit Facility

		Under the Indenture governing the Company’s Senior Notes, the Company is permitted to incur indebtedness pursuant to a credit agreement, or the refinancing or replacement of a credit facility, provided that the aggregate principal amount of indebtedness thereunder outstanding at any time does not exceed the greater of a) $30,000,000 minus the amount of any such indebtedness retired with the proceeds of an Asset Sale and (b) 15% of Total Assets, as defined in the Indenture, of the Company. The Indenture also permits the Company to incur indebtedness solely in respect of performances, surety or appeal bonds, letters of credit and letters of guarantee as required in the ordinary course of business in accordance with customary industry practices. On February 6, 2004, the Company entered into a Loan Agreement for a secured revolving credit facility as amended on June 30, 2005 and as further amended by the Second Amendment to the Loan Agreement which was entered into with effect from May 16, 2006 (the “Credit Facility”). The Credit Facility is a revolving credit facility expiring on October 31, 2009 with an optional one year renewal thereafter contingent upon approval by the lender, permitting maximum aggregate borrowings equal to the lesser of (i) $40.0 million, (ii) a collateral calculation based on percentages of the book values for the Company’s net investment in sales-type leases, financing receivables, finished goods inventory allocated to backlog contracts and the appraised values of the expected future cash flows related to operating leases and of the Company’s owned real property, reduced by certain accruals and accounts payable and (iii) a minimum level of trailing cash collections in the preceding twenty–six week period ($55.3 million as of June 30, 2007), and is subject to certain limitations under the Company’s Senior Notes and is reduced for outstanding letters of credit. As at June 30, 2007, the Company’s current borrowing capacity under such calculation is $25.5 million after deduction for outstanding letters of credit of $11.4 million. The Credit Facility bears interest at the applicable prime rate per annum or LIBOR plus a margin as specified therein per annum and is collateralized by a first priority security interest in all of the current and future assets of the Company. The Credit Facility contains typical affirmative and negative covenants, including covenants that restrict the Company’s ability to: incur certain additional indebtedness; make certain loans, investments or guarantees; pay dividends; make certain asset sales; incur certain liens or other encumbrances; conduct certain transactions with affiliates and enter into certain corporate transactions. In addition, the Credit Facility agreement contains customary events of default, including upon an acquisition or a change of control that may have a material adverse effect on the Company or a guarantor. The Credit Facility also requires the Company to maintain, over a period of time, a minimum level of adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization including film asset amortization, stock and other non-cash compensation, write downs (recoveries), and asset impairment charges, and other non-cash uses of funds on a trailing four quarter basis calculated quarterly, of not less than $20.0 million. In the event that the Company’s available borrowing base falls below the amount borrowed against the Credit Facility, the excess above the available borrowing base becomes due upon demand by the lender. If the Credit Facility were to be terminated by either the Company or the lender, the Company would have the ability to pursue another source of financing pursuant to the terms of the Indenture.

		Under the terms of the Credit Facility, the Company has to comply with several reporting requirements including the delivery of audited consolidated financial statements within 120 days of the end of the fiscal year.

		In March 2007, the Company delayed the filing of its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 beyond the filing deadline in order to restate financial statements for certain periods during the fiscal years 2002 — 2006. On March 27, 2007, the Credit Facility lender waived the requirement for the Company to deliver audited consolidated financial statements within 120 days of the end of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, provided such statements and documents were delivered on or before June 30, 2007. On June 27, 2007, the Credit Facility lender agreed that an event of default would not be deemed to have occurred unless the Company’s 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K filing did not occur by July 31, 2007 or upon the occurrence and continuance of an event of default under the Company’s Indenture governing its Senior Notes which, had not been cured within the applicable grace period. The Company cured such default under the Indenture by filing its 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K and first quarter 2007 Form 10-Q on July 20, 2007.

Page 23

8.		Commitments

(a)		The Company’s lease commitments consist of rent and equipment under operating lease. The Company accounts for any incentives provided over the term of the lease. Total minimum annual rental payments to be made by the Company under operating leases for premises and equipment as of June 30, 2007 for each of the years ended December 31, are as follows:


2007 (six months remaining)	$	3,222
2008		6,127
2009		5,883
2010		6,029
2011		6,166
Thereafter		14,686

	$	42,113

		Recorded in accrued liabilities balance as at June 30, 2007 is $9.4 million (December 31, 2006 - $9.6 million) related to rent expense recognized in excess of rental payments made and landlord incentives.

(b)		As at June 30, 2007, the Company has letters of credit of $11.5 million (December 31, 2006 - $9.4 million) outstanding under the Company’s credit facility arrangement (see note 7). In addition, as at June 30, 2007, the Company has performance security guarantees of $0.6 million (December 31, 2006 — $0.6 million) outstanding that have been guaranteed through Export Development Canada.

(c)		The Company compensates its sales force with both fixed and variable compensation. Commissions on the sale or lease of the Company’s theater system components are due in graduated amounts from the time of collection of the customer’s first payment to the Company up to the collection of the customer’s last initial payment. At June 30, 2007, $0.2 million (December 31, 2006 — $0.3 million) of commissions will be payable in future periods if the Company collects its initial payments as anticipated.

9.		Contingencies and Guarantees

		The Company is involved in lawsuits, claims, and proceedings, including those identified below, which arise in the ordinary course of business. In accordance with SFAS No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies”, the Company will make a provision for a liability when it is both probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. The Company believes it has adequate provisions for any such matters. The Company reviews these provisions in conjunction with any related provisions on assets related to the claims at least quarterly and adjusts these provisions to reflect the impacts of negotiations, settlements, rulings, advice of legal counsel and other pertinent information related to the case. Should developments in any of these matters outlined below cause a change in the Company’s determination as to an unfavorable outcome and result in the need to recognize a material provision, or, should any of these matters result in a final adverse judgment or be settled for significant amounts, they could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, cash flows, and financial position in the period or periods in which such a change in determination, settlement or judgment occurs.

		The Company expenses legal costs relating to its lawsuits, claims and proceedings as incurred.

Page 24

9.		Contingencies and Guarantees (cont’d)

(a)		In March 2005, the Company, together with Three-Dimensional Media Group, Ltd. (“3DMG”), filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, Western Division, against In-Three, Inc. (“In-Three”) alleging patent infringement. On March 10, 2006, the Company and In-Three entered into a settlement agreement settling the dispute between the Company and In-Three. On June 12, 2006, the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, Western Division, entered a stay in the proceedings against In-Three pending the arbitration of disputes between the Company and 3DMG. Arbitration was initiated by the Company against 3DMG on May 15, 2006 before the International Centre for Dispute Resolution in New York, alleging breaches of the license and consulting agreements between the Company and 3DMG. On June 15, 2006, 3DMG filed an answer denying any breaches and asserting counterclaims that the Company breached the parties’ license agreement. On June 21, 2007, the Arbitration Panel unanimously denied 3DMG’s Motion for Summary Judgment filed on April 11, 2007 concerning the Company’s claims and 3DMG’s counterclaims. On October 5, 2007, 3DMG amended its counterclaims and added counterclaims from UNIPAT.ORG relating to fees allegedly owed to UNIPAT.ORG by IMAX. An evidentiary hearing on liability issues has been set for January 2008 with further proceedings on damages issues to be scheduled if and when necessary. The Company will continue to pursue its claims vigorously and believes that all allegations made by 3DMG are without merit. The Company further believes that the amount of loss, if any, suffered in connection with the counterclaims would not have a material impact on the financial position or operations of the Company, although no assurance can be given with respect to the ultimate outcome of the arbitration.

(b)		In January 2004, the Company and IMAX Theater Services Ltd., a subsidiary of the Company, commenced an arbitration seeking damages of approximately $3.7 million before the International Court of Arbitration of the International Chambers of Commerce (the “ICC”) with respect to the breach by Electronic Media Limited (“EML”) of its December 2000 agreement with the Company. In June 2004, the Company commenced a related arbitration before the ICC against EML’s affiliate, E-CITI Entertainment (I) PVT Limited (“E-Citi”), seeking $17.8 million in damages as a result of E-Citi’s breach of a September 2000 lease agreement. The damages sought against E-Citi included the original claim sought against EML. An arbitration hearing took place in November 2005 against E-Citi, which included all claims by the Company. On February 1, 2006, the ICC issued an award on liability finding unanimously in the Company’s favor on all claims. Further hearings took place in July 2006 and December 2006. On August 24, 2007, the ICC issued an award unanimously in favor of the Company in the amount of $9.4 million, consisting of past and future rents owed to the Company under its lease agreements, plus interest and costs. In the award, the ICC upheld the validity and enforceability of the Company’s theater system contract. The Company has now submitted its application to the arbitration panel for interest and costs and is awaiting the Panel’s decision on that issue.

(c)		In June 2004, Robots of Mars, Inc. (“Robots”) initiated an arbitration proceeding against the Company in California with the American Arbitration Association pursuant to an arbitration provision in a 1994 film production agreement between Robots’ predecessor-in-interest and a subsidiary of the Company, asserting claims for breach of contract, fraud, breach of fiduciary duty and intentional interference with contract. Robots is seeking an accounting of the Company’s revenues and an award of all sums alleged to be due to Robots under the production agreement, as well as punitive damages. The Company intends to vigorously defend the arbitration proceeding and believes the amount of the loss, if any, that may be suffered in connection with this proceeding will not have a material impact on the financial position or results of operations of the Company, although no assurance can be given with respect to the ultimate outcome of such arbitration.

Page 25

9.		Contingencies and Guarantees (cont’d)

(d)		The Company and certain of its officers and directors were named as defendants in eight purported class action lawsuits filed between August 11, 2006 and September 18, 2006, alleging violations of U.S. federal securities laws. These eight actions were filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. On January 18, 2007, the Court consolidated all eight class action lawsuits and appointed Westchester Capital Management, Inc. as the lead plaintiff and Abbey Spanier Rodd Abrams & Paradis LLP as lead plaintiff’s counsel. On October 2, 2007, plaintiffs filed a consolidated amended class action complaint. The amended complaint, brought on behalf of shareholders who purchased the Company’s common stock between February 27, 2003 through July 30, 2007, alleges primarily that the defendants engaged in securities fraud by disseminating materially false and misleading statements during the class period regarding the Company’s revenue recognition of theater system installations, and failing to disclose material information concerning the Company’s revenue recognition practices. The amended complaint also adds PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the Company’s auditors, as a defendant. The lawsuit seeks unspecified compensatory damages, costs, and expenses. The lawsuit is at a very early stage and as a result the Company is not able to estimate a potential loss exposure. The Company believes the allegations made against it in the amended complaint are meritless and will vigorously defend the matter, although no assurances can be given with respect to the outcome of such proceedings. The Company’s directors and officers insurance policy provides for reimbursement for costs and expenses incurred in connection with this lawsuit as well as potential damages awarded, if any, subject to certain policy limits and deductibles. The deadline for defendants to respond to the amended complaint is currently December 3, 2007.

(e)		A class action lawsuit was filed on September 20, 2006 in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice against the Company and certain of its officers and directors, alleging violations of Canadian securities laws. This lawsuit was brought on behalf of shareholders who acquired the Company’s securities between February 17, 2006 and August 9, 2006. The lawsuit is in a very early stage and seeks unspecified compensatory and punitive damages, as well as costs and expenses. As a result, the Company is unable to estimate a potential loss exposure. The Company believes the allegations made against it in the statement of claim are meritless and will vigorously defend the matter, although no assurance can be given with respect to the ultimate outcome of such proceedings. The Company’s directors and officers insurance policy provides for reimbursement for costs and expenses incurred in connection with this lawsuit as well as potential damages awarded, if any, subject to certain policy limits and deductibles.

(f)		On September 7, 2007, Catalyst Fund Limited Partnership II, a holder of the Company’s Senior Notes (“Catalyst”), commenced an application against the Company in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice for a declaration of oppression pursuant to s. 229 and 241 of the Canada Business Corporations Act (“CBCA”) and for a declaration that the Company is in default of the Indenture governing its Senior Notes. The allegations of oppression are substantially the same as allegations Catalyst made in a May 10, 2007 complaint filed against the Company in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, and subsequently withdrawn on October 12, 2007, wherein Catalyst challenged the validity of the consent solicitation through which the Company requested and obtained a waiver of any and all defaults arising from a failure to comply with the reporting covenant under the Indenture and alleged common law fraud. Catalyst has also requested the appointment of an inspector and an order that an investigation be carried out pursuant to s. 229 of the CBCA. In addition, between March 2007 and October 2007, Catalyst has sent the Company eight purported notices of default or acceleration under the Indenture. It is the Company’s position that no default or event of default (as those terms are defined in the Indenture) has occurred or is continuing under the Indenture and, accordingly, that Catalyst’s purported acceleration notice is of no force or effect. The Company is in the process of responding to the Ontario application and a hearing is scheduled to take place on January 15 and 16, 2008. The litigation is at a preliminary stage and as a result, the Company is not able to estimate a potential loss exposure. The Company believes this application is entirely without merit and plans to contest it vigorously and seek costs from Catalyst, although no assurances can be given with respect to the outcome of the proceedings.

Page 26

9.		Contingencies and Guarantees (cont’d)

(g)		In addition to the matters described above, the Company is currently involved in other legal proceedings which, in the opinion of the Company’s management, will not materially affect the Company’s financial position or future operating results, although no assurance can be given with respect to the ultimate outcome of any such proceedings.

(h)		In the normal course of business, the Company enters into agreements that may contain features that meet the FASB issued Interpretation No. 45, “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others” (“FIN 45”) definition of a guarantee. FIN 45 defines a guarantee to be a contract (including an indemnity) that contingently requires the Company to make payments (either in cash, financial instruments, other assets, shares of its stock or provision of services) to a third party based on (a) changes in an underlying interest rate, foreign exchange rate, equity or commodity instrument, index or other variable, that is related to an asset, a liability or an equity security of the counterparty, (b) failure of another party to perform under an obligating agreement or (c) failure of another third party to pay its indebtedness when due.

		Financial Guarantees

		The Company has provided no significant financial guarantees to third parties.

		Product Warranties

		The following summarizes the accrual for product warranties that was recorded as part of accrued liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2007:


Balance as at December 31, 2006	$	38
Payments		(65	)
Warranties provision		15
Revisions		24

Balance as of June 30, 2007	$	12

		Director/Officer Indemnification

		The Company’s General By-law contains an indemnification of its directors/officers, former directors/officers and persons who have acted at its request to be a director/officer of an entity in which the Company is a shareholder or creditor, to indemnify them, to the extent permitted by the Canada Business Corporations Act, against expenses (including legal fees), judgments, fines and any amount actually and reasonably incurred by them in connection with any action, suit or proceeding in which the directors and/or officers are sued as a result of their service, if they acted honestly and in good faith with a view to the best interests of the Company. The nature of the indemnification prevents the Company from making a reasonable estimate of the maximum potential amount it could be required to pay to counterparties. The Company has purchased directors’ and officers’ liability insurance. No amount has been accrued in the consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2007, with respect to this indemnity.

Page 27

9.		Contingencies and Guarantees (cont’d)

		Other Indemnification Agreements

		In the normal course of the Company’s operations, it provides indemnifications to counterparties in transactions such as: theater system lease and sale agreements and the supervision of installation or servicing of the theater systems; film production, exhibition and distribution agreements; real property lease agreements; and employment agreements. These indemnification agreements require the Company to compensate the counterparties for costs incurred as a result of litigation claims that may be suffered by the counterparty as a consequence of the transaction or the Company’s breach or non-performance under these agreements. While the terms of these indemnification agreements vary based upon the contract, they normally extend for the life of the agreements. A small number of agreements do not provide for any limit on the maximum potential amount of indemnification, however virtually all of the Company’s system lease and sale agreements limit such maximum potential liability to the purchase price of the system. The fact that the maximum potential amount of indemnification required by the Company is not specified in some cases prevents the Company from making a reasonable estimate of the maximum potential amount it could be required to pay to counterparties. Historically, the Company has not made any significant payments under such indemnifications and no amount has been accrued in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements with respect to the contingent aspect of these indemnities.

10.		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations Supplemental Information

		Included in selling, general and administrative expenses for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 is a gain of $0.5 million and $0.6 million, respectively (2006 – $0.4 million and $0.4 million, respectively), for net foreign exchange gains or losses related to the translation of foreign currency denominated monetary assets, liabilities and integrated subsidiaries.

11.		Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(a)		Changes in other non-cash operating assets and liabilities are comprised of the following:


	Six months ended
	June 30,
	2007			2006
	As restated			As restated
Decrease (increase) in:
Accounts receivable	$	(297	)	$	(2,174	)
Financing receivables		3,712			(2,181	)
Inventories		(2,334	)		(912	)
Prepaid expenses		380			(970	)
Commissions and other deferred selling expenses		(564	)		(100	)
Increase (decrease) in:
Accounts payable		(2,971	)		(380	)
Accrued liabilities		(101	)		714
Deferred revenue		4,402			3,301

	$	2,227		$	(2,702	)

Page 28

11.		Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (cont’d)

(b)		Cash payments made during the quarter on account of:


	Six months ended
	June 30,
	2007		2006
	As restated		As restated
Income taxes	$	154	$	649


Interest	$	8,049	$	7,783

(c)

Depreciation and amortization are comprised of the following:


	Six months ended
	June 30,
	2007		2006
	As restated		As restated
Film assets	$	2,646	$	4,148
Property, plant and equipment		2,755		2,317
Other assets		—		235
Other intangible assets		277		324
Deferred financing costs		576		614

	$	6,254	$	7,638

(d)

Write-downs (recoveries) are comprised of the following:


	Six months ended
	June 30,
	2007			2006
Accounts receivable	$	(58	)	$	284
Financing receivables		33			(393	)

	$	(25	)	$	(109	)

12.

Receivable Provisions, Net of (Recoveries)


	Three months ended						Six months ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2007			2006			2007			2006
Accounts receivable provisions, net of (recoveries)	$	(47	)	$	81		$	(58	)	$	284
Financing receivables, net of (recoveries)		16			(333	)		33			(393	)

Receivable provisions, net of (recoveries)	$	(31	)	$	(252	)	$	(25	)	$	(109	)

Page 29

13.		Income Taxes

		The Company’s effective tax rate differs from the statutory tax rate and will vary from year to year primarily as a result of numerous permanent differences, investment and other tax credits, the provision for income taxes at different rates in foreign and other provincial jurisdictions, enacted Statutory tax rate increases or reductions in the year, changes in the Company’s valuation allowance based on the Company’s recoverability assessments of deferred tax assets, and favourable or unfavourable resolution of various tax examinations. There was no change in the Company’s estimates of projected future earnings and the recoverability of its deferred tax assets based on an analysis of both positive and negative evidence.

		As at June 30, 2007, the Company has net deferred income tax assets of $nil (December 31, 2006 - $nil). As of June 30, 2007, the Company had a gross deferred income tax asset of $57.3 million, against which the Company is carrying a $57.3 million valuation allowance.

		In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes – An Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes”. This Interpretation prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. This Interpretation also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. In connection with the Company’s adoption of FIN 48, as of January 1, 2007, the Company recorded a net increase to deficit of $2.1 million (including approximately $0.9 million related to accrued interest and penalties) related to the measurement of potential international withholding tax requirements and a decrease in reserves for income taxes. As of June 30, 2007 and January 1, 2007, the Company had total unrecognized tax benefits of $4.0 million and $3.7 comprised of (i) $3.8 million and $3.5 million for international withholding taxes, respectively, and (ii) $0.2 million related to Large Corporations’ Tax as of both periods. All of the unrecognized tax benefits could impact the Company’s effective tax rate if recognized. While the Company believes it has adequately provided for all tax positions, amounts asserted by taxing authorities could differ from the Company’s accrued position. Accordingly, additional provisions on federal and foreign tax-related matters could be recorded in the future as revised estimates are made or the underlying matters are settled or otherwise resolved.

		Consistent with its historical financial reporting, the Company has elected to classify interest and penalties related to income tax liabilities, when applicable, as part of the interest expense in its Consolidated Statements of Operations rather than income tax expense. In conjunction with the adoption of FIN 48, the Company recognized approximately $0.1 million in potential interest and penalties associated with uncertain tax positions for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2007.

Page 30

14.		Capital Stock

(a)		Stock-Based Compensation

		The Company has four stock-based compensation plans that are described below. The compensation costs recorded in the statement of operations for these plans were a less than $0.1 million recovery and a $1.0 million expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, respectively (2006 — $0.5 million expense and $1.4 million expense). No income tax benefit is recorded in the consolidated statement of operations for these costs.

		Stock Option Plan

		The Company’s Stock Option Plan, which is shareholder approved, permits the grant of options to employees, directors and consultants.

		The Company’s policy is to issue new shares from treasury to satisfy stock options which are exercised.

		The weighted average fair value of all common share options granted to employees for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 at the date of grant was $2.39 and $2.40 per share, respectively (2006 — $2.95 and 3.74 per share). The Company utilizes a Binomial Model to determine the fair value of common share options at the grant date. The following assumptions were used:


	Three months ended						Six months ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2007			2006			2007			2006
Average risk-free interest rate		5.04	%		5.13	%		5.02	%		4.85	%
Market risk premium		5.16	%		5.24	%		5.16 — 5.73	%		5.24 — 5.60	%
Beta		0.86 — 0.94			1.06			0.82 — 0.94			1.06 — 1.28
Expected option life (in years)		5.28 — 5.34			2.47 — 3.03			5.28 — 5.34			2.47 — 5.33
Expected volatility		61	%		60	%		61	%		60	%
Annual termination probability		11.87	%		8.06	%		11.87	%		8.06	%
Dividend yield		0	%		0	%		0	%		0	%

As the Company stratifies its employees into two groups in order to calculate fair value under the Binomial Model, ranges of assumptions used are presented for equity risk premium, Beta, expected option life and annual termination probability. The Company uses historical data to estimate option exercise and employee termination within the valuation model; separate groups of employees that have similar historical exercise behavior are considered separately for valuation purposes. The expected volatility rate is estimated based on the Company’s historical share-price volatility. The market risk premium reflects the amount by which the return on the market portfolio exceeds the risk-free rate, where the return on the market portfolio is based on the Standard and Poors 500 index. The Company utilizes an expected term method to determine expected option life based on such data as vesting periods of awards, historical data that includes past exercise and post-vesting cancellations and stock price history.

Page 31

14.		Capital Stock (cont’d)

(a)		Stock-Based Compensation (cont’d)

		Stock Option Plan (cont’d)

		As at June 30, 2007, the Company has reserved a total of 6,972,157 (December 31, 2006 – 6,974,657) common shares for future issuance under the Stock Option Plan, of which options in respect of 5,287,140 common shares are outstanding at June 30, 2007. Options are granted with an exercise price equal to the market value of the Company’s stock at the grant date. The options generally vest between one and five years and expire 10 years or less from the date granted. The Plan provides that vesting will be accelerated if there is a change of control, as defined in the plan. At June 30, 2007, options in respect of 4,535,617 common shares were vested and exercisable.

		The following table summarizes certain information in respect of option activity under the Stock Option Plan for the periods ended June 30:


							Weighted average
	Number of shares						exercise price per share
	2007			2006			2007		2006
Options outstanding, beginning of year		5,100,995			5,262,824		$	7.12	$	6.82
Granted		261,645			59,984			4.48		9.19
Exercised		(2,500	)		(72,032	)		3.04		3.96
Forfeited		(28,575	)		(87,768	)		7.54		8.01
Expired		(28,000	)		(20,000	)		18.45		16.34
Cancelled		(16,425	)		(15,833	)		6.89		21.33

Options outstanding, end of period		5,287,140			5,127,175			6.93		7.13

Options exercisable, end of period		4,535,617			4,343,947			6.97		7.09

		In the first half of 2007, the Company cancelled 16,425 stock options from its Stock Option Plan (2006 – 15,833) surrendered by Company employees for $nil consideration.

		As at June 30, 2007, 5,124,222 options are fully vested or are expected to vest with a weighted average exercise price of $6.92, aggregate intrinsic value of $0.7 million and weighted average remaining contractual life of 4.1 years. As at June 30, 2007, options that are exercisable have an intrinsic value of $0.7 million and a weighted average remaining contractual life of 4.0 years. The intrinsic value of options exercised in the six months ended June 30, 2007 was $0.5 million (2006 - less than $0.1 million).

		In the fourth quarter of 2006, the Company determined it had exceeded, by approximately 1.6% or 789,286 options (of which 45,286 were granted in the second quarter of 2006), certain cap limits for grants set by its Stock Option Plan. The options issued in excess of the cap limits were treated as liability-based awards commencing in the third quarter of 2006 as the Company determined it intended to settle the options in cash. The fair value of the options was recalculated each period. In the first quarter of 2007, the Company accelerated the vesting period to March 31, 2007. Immediately before the settlement date, the Company had accrued a liability of $0.7 million. In June 2007, the Company settled all but 195,286 options for cash in an amount of $0.5 million. The remaining 195,286 options were voluntarily surrendered by the Co-CEOs and members of the Board of Directors for no consideration, as a result the $0.2 million remaining in accrued liabilities was credited to Other Equity.

Page 32

14.		Capital Stock (cont’d)

(a)		Stock-Based Compensation (cont’d)

		Stock Option Plan (cont’d)

		*Options to Non-Employees*

		In the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, an aggregate of 120,255 and 129,145, respectively (2006 — 26,649 and 49,984) options to purchase the Company’s common stock with an average exercise price of $4.54 and $4.53, respectively (2006 — $9.35 and $9.07) were issued to certain advisors and strategic partners of the Company. These options have a maximum contractual life of seven years. Certain of these options vest immediately and others upon the occurrence of certain events. These options were granted under the Stock Option Plan.

		The Company has calculated the fair value of these options to non-employees for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 to be $0.1 million and $0.1 million, respectively (2006 — $0.1 million and $0.2 million), using a Binomial option-pricing model with the following underlying assumptions for periods ended:


	Three months ended						Six months ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2007			2006			2007			2006
Average risk-free interest rate		4.99	%		5.01	%		4.97	%		4.83	%
Contractual option life	6 years			5-7 years			6 years			5-7 years
Average expected volatility		61	%		60	%		61	%		60	%
Dividend yield		0	%		0	%		0	%		0	%

		For the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, the Company has recorded a charge of $0.1 million and $0.1 million, respectively (2006 — $0.1 million and $0.2 million) to film cost of sales related to the non-employee stock options.

		As at June 30, 2007, non-employee options outstanding amounted to 245,804 options (2006 – 89,989) with a weighted-average exercise price of $6.43 (2006 — $9.46). 128,884 options (2006 – 79,989) were exercisable with an average weighted exercise price of $7.80 (2006 — $9.53) and the vested options have an aggregate intrinsic value of less than $0.1 million.

		Restricted Common Shares

		Under the terms of certain employment agreements dated July 12, 2000, the Company is required to issue either 160,000 restricted common shares or pay their cash equivalent. The restricted shares are required to be issued, or payment of their cash equivalent, upon request by the employees at any time. The aggregate intrinsic value of the awards outstanding is $0.7 million. The Company accounts for the obligation as a liability, which is classified within accrued liabilities. The Company has recorded a $0.1 million recovery and $0.1 million expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, respectively (2006 — $0.2 million recovery and $0.3 million expense), due to the changes in the Company’s stock price during the period.

Page 33

14.		Capital Stock (cont’d)

(a)		Stock-Based Compensation (cont’d)

		Stock Appreciation Rights

		On February 15, 2007, 600,000 stock appreciation rights with an exercise price of $4.34 per right were granted to Company executives. Half of the rights were vested upon issuance and were exercisable immediately and the other 300,000 rights will vest and be exercisable by the end of 2007. The unvested rights were measured at fair value at the date of grant and are remeasured each period until settled. At June 30, 2007, these unvested rights had a fair value of $1.93 per right. The vested rights have an intrinsic value of $nil per right as the exercise price of the rights is greater than the Company’s stock price at June 30, 2007. The Company accounts for the obligation of these rights as a liability, which is classified within accrued liabilities. The Company has recorded a $0.1 million recovery and $0.2 million charge for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, respectively to SG&A related to these rights. The following assumptions were used at June 30, 2007 for measuring the fair value of the rights that vest during 2007:


Risk-free interest rate	5.11	%
Market risk premium	5.16	%
Beta	0.91
Expected option life (in years)	5.79
Expected volatility	61	%
Annual termination probability	0	%
Dividend yield	0	%

		Warrants to Non-Employees

		There were no warrants issued during the three months ended or outstanding as of June 30, 2007 and 2006.

(b)		Earnings (Loss) per Share

		Reconciliations of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted per-share computations are comprised of the following:


	Three months ended					Six months ended
	June 30,					June 30,
	2007			2006		2007			2006
	As restated			As restated		As restated			As restated
Net (loss) earnings from continuing operations applicable to common shareholders	$	(4,533	)	$	1,658	$	(9,274	)	$	(2,046	)


Weighted average number of common shares (000’s):
Issued and outstanding, beginning of period		40,286			40,280		40,286			40,213
Weighted average number of shares issued during the period		1			5		—			42

Weighted average number of shares used in computing basic earnings per share		40,287			40,285		40,286			40,255
Assumed exercise of stock options, net of shares assumed repurchased		—			1,919		—			—

Weighted average number of shares used in computing diluted earnings per share		40,287			42,204		40,286			40,255

The calculation of diluted earnings per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 excludes all shares that are issuable upon exercise of options as the impact of these exercises would be antidilutive.

Page 34

14.		Capital Stock (cont’d)

(c)		Shareholders’ Deficit

		The following summarizes the movement of Shareholders’ Deficit for the six months ended June 30, 2007:


Balance as of December 31, 2006 (as restated)	$	(58,232	)
Issuance of common shares		8
Net loss		(9,274	)
Adjustment to other equity for employee stock options granted		213
Adjustment to other equity capital for non-employee stock options granted		80
Adjustment to other equity capital for employee stock options cancelled		170
Adjustment to deficit on adoption of FIN 48		(2,093	)
Adjustments to accumulated other comprehensive income to amortize the prior service credits related to pensions and record the actuarial loss		(672	)

Balance as of June 30, 2007 (as restated)	$	(69,800	)

15.		Segmented Information

		The Company has six reportable segments identified by category of product sold or service provided: IMAX systems; film production and IMAX DMR; film distribution; film post-production; theater operations; and other. The IMAX systems segment designs, manufactures, sells or leases and maintains IMAX theater projection system equipment. The film production and IMAX DMR segment produces films and performs film re-mastering services. The film distribution segment distributes films for which the Company has distribution rights. The film post-production segment provides film post-production and film print services. The theater operations segment owns and operates certain IMAX theaters. The other segment includes camera rentals and other miscellaneous items. The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in note 2 to the audited consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006. The Company has conformed its segment information in the current year to the current information used by the Company’s Chief Operating Design Makers (“CODM”), as defined in SFAS No. 131 “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information” (“SFAS 131”).

		Transactions between the film production and IMAX DMR segment and the film post-production segment are valued at exchange value. Inter-segment profits are eliminated upon consolidation, as well as for the disclosures below.

		Transactions between the other segments are not significant.

Page 35

15.		Segmented Information (cont’d)

		The CODM assess segment performance based on segment gross margins. Selling, general and administrative expenses, research and development costs, amortization of intangibles, receivables provisions (recoveries), interest revenue, interest expense and tax provision (recovery) are not allocated to the segments.


	Three months ended					Six months ended
	June 30,					June 30,
	2007		2006			2007			2006
	As restated		As restated			As restated			As restated
Revenue
IMAX systems	$	13,984	$	21,122		$	27,102		$	33,919
Films
Production and IMAX DMR		3,801		4,063			8,393			5,160
Distribution		2,692		4,639			6,102			8,063
Post-production		1,472		3,042			2,546			4,524
Theater operations		4,579		4,071			9,066			7,763
Other		986		1,225			1,508			2,067

Total	$	27,514	$	38,162		$	54,717		$	61,496


Gross margins
IMAX systems	$	8,077	$	11,057		$	15,642		$	18,424
Films
Production and IMAX DMR		1,545		1,244			3,927			706
Distribution		942		1,560			2,298			2,104
Post-production		1,132		1,009			1,234			1,438
Theater operations		459		854			653			1,151
Other		98		(29	)		(93	)		(138	)

Total	$	12,253	$	15,695		$	23,661		$	23,685

16.		Discontinued Operations

(a)		Miami Theater LLC

		On December 23, 2003, the Company closed its owned and operated Miami IMAX theater. The Company completed its abandonment of assets and removal of its projection system from the theater in the first quarter of 2004, with no financial impact. The Company was involved in an arbitration proceeding with the landlord of the theater with respect to the amount owing to the landlord by the Company for lease and guarantee obligations. The amount of loss to the Company had been estimated as between $0.9 million and $2.3 million. Prior to 2006, the Company paid out $0.8 million with respect to amounts owing to the landlord. The Company paid out an additional $0.1 million and also accrued $0.8 million in net loss from discontinued operations related to Miami IMAX Theater in the fourth quarter of 2006. On January 4, 2007, as a result of a settlement negotiated between both parties, the Company paid out a final $0.8 million, extinguishing its obligations to the landlord.

(b)		Digital Projection International

		On December 29, 2005, the Company and a previously wholly-owned subsidiary, Digital Projection International, entered into an agreement to settle its loan agreements in exchange for a payment of $3.5 million. During the six months ended June 30, 2006, the Company recognized $2.3 million in income from discontinued operations as a result of this settlement. The other $1.2 million was recognized in 2005.

Page 36

17.		Employees Pension and Postretirement Benefits

(a)		Defined Benefit Plan

		The Company has an unfunded U.S. defined benefit pension plan, the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the “SERP”), covering its two Co-CEOs. The SERP provides for a lifetime retirement benefit from age 55 determined as 75% of the member’s best average 60 consecutive months of earnings.

		Under the original terms of the SERP, once benefit payments begin, the benefit is indexed annually to the cost of living and further provides for 100% continuance for life to the surviving spouse. On March 8, 2006, the Company and the Co-CEOs negotiated an amendment to the SERP effective January 1, 2006, which reduced the related pension expense to the Company. The Company was represented by the independent directors (as defined in Rule 4200(a)(15) of the NASDAQ Marketplace Rules and Section 1.4 of Multilateral Instrument 52-110, who retained Mercer Human Resources Consulting and outside legal counsel to advise them on certain analyses regarding the SERP. Under the terms of the SERP amendment, the cost of living adjustment and surviving spouse benefits previously owed to the Co-CEOs are each reduced by 50%, subject to a recoupment of a percentage of such benefits upon a change of control of the Company, and the net present value of the reduced pension benefit payments is accelerated and paid out upon a change of control of the Company. The benefits were 50% vested as of July 2000, the SERP initiation date. The vesting percentage increases on a straight-line basis from inception until age 55. The vesting percentage of a member whose employment terminates other than by voluntary retirement or upon a change in control shall be 100%. The actuarial liability was remeasured as of March 8, 2006 to reflect the SERP changes adopted. Under the original terms of the SERP, benefits were determined as 75% of the member’s best average 60 consecutive months of earnings during the 120 months preceding retirement. On May 4, 2007, the Company amended the SERP to provide for the determination of benefits to be 75% of the member’s best average 60 consecutive months of earnings over the member’s employment history. The actuarial liability was remeasured to reflect this amendment. The amendment resulted in a $1.0 million increase to the pension liability and a corresponding $1.0 million change to other comprehensive income. As of June 30, 2007, one of the Co-CEO’s benefits was 100% vested and the other Co-CEO’s benefits were approximately 84% vested.

		The amount accrued for the SERP is determined as follows:


	Six months ended
	June 30, 2007
Projected benefit obligation:
Obligation, beginning of period	$	26,109
Service cost		344
Interest cost		678
Actuarial loss resulting from the amendment		997
Amortization of prior service credits		(473	)

Obligation, end of period	$	27,655

Unfunded status:
Obligation, end of period	$	27,655

Accrued pension liability	$	27,655

The following table provides disclosure of pension expense for the SERP for periods ended June 30:


	Three months ended June 30,					Six months ended June 30,
	2007		2006			2007		2006
			As restated					As restated
Service cost	$	172	$	364		$	344	$	821
Interest cost		339		297			678		659
Amortization of prior service credits		—		(237	)		—		(83	)

Pension expense	$	511	$	424		$	1,022	$	1,397

The accumulated benefit obligation for the SERP was $27.7 million at June 30, 2007 and $26.1 million at December 31, 2006. No contributions are expected to be made for the SERP during 2007.

Page 37

17.		Employees Pension and Postretirement Benefits (cont’d)

(a)		Defined Benefit Plan (cont’d)

		As a result of the SERP amendment, in the first quarter of 2006, an adjustment to the unrecognized actuarial losses of $2.8 million and unrecognized prior service cost of $3.4 million was recorded in comprehensive income (loss) and other assets.

		The following benefit payments are expected to be made as per the current SERP assumptions and the terms of the SERP in each of the next five years, and in the aggregate over the five years thereafter:


2007	$	—
2008		1,045
2009		1,058
2010		32,496
2011 to 2016		—

		At the time the Company established the SERP, it also took out life insurance policies on its two Co-CEOs with coverage amounts of $21.5 million in aggregate. The Company intends to use the cash surrender value proceeds of life insurance policies taken on its Co-CEOs to be applied towards the benefits due and payable under the SERP, although there can be no assurance that the Company will ultimately do so. At June 30, 2007, the cash surrender value of the insurance policies is $4.6 million (December 31, 2006 — $4.3 million) and has been included in other assets.

(b)		Defined Contribution Plan

		The Company also maintains defined contribution pension plans for its employees, including its executive officers. The Company makes contributions to these plans on behalf of employees in an amount up to 5% of their base salary subject to certain prescribed maximums. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, the Company contributed and expensed an aggregate of $0.2 million and $0.4 million, respectively (2006 — $0.2 million and $0.4 million), to its Canadian plan and an aggregate of less than $0.1 million and $0.1 million, respectively (2006 — less than $0.1 million and $0.1 million), to its defined contribution employee pension plan under Section 401(k) of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code.

(c)		Postretirement Benefits

		The Company has an unfunded postretirement plan covering its two Co-CEOs. The plan provides that the Company will maintain health benefits for the Co-CEOs until they become eligible for Medicare and, thereafter, the Company will provide Medicare supplement coverage as selected by the Co-CEO. The postretirement benefits obligation as of June 30, 2007 is $0.4 million. The Company has expensed less than $0.1 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 with respect to this obligation (2006 – less than $0.1 million).

18.		Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

		In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”, which is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and for interim periods within those years. This statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands the related disclosure requirements. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of this statement.

		In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities — Including an Amendment of FASB Statements No. 115” (“SFAS 159”). SFAS 159 allows the irrevocable election of fair value as the initial and subsequent measurement attribute for certain financial assets and liabilities and other items on an instrument-by-instrument basis. Changes in fair value would be reflected in earnings as they occur. The objective of SFAS 159 is to improve financial reporting by providing entities with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. SFAS 159 is effective as of the beginning of the first fiscal year beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently evaluating if it will elect the fair value option for any of its eligible financial instruments and other items.

Page 38

19.		Supplemental Consolidating Financial Information

		The Company’s Senior Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed, jointly and severally by specific wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company (the “Guarantor Subsidiaries”). The main Guarantor Subsidiaries are David Keighley Productions 70MM Inc., Sonics Associates Inc., and the subsidiaries that own and operate certain theaters. These guarantees are full and unconditional. The information under the column headed “Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries” relates to the following subsidiaries of the Company: IMAX Japan Inc. and IMAX B.V. (the “Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries”) which have not provided any guarantees of the Senior Notes.

		Investments in subsidiaries are accounted for by the equity method for purposes of the supplemental consolidating financial data. Some subsidiaries may be unable to pay dividends due to negative working capital.

		Supplemental Consolidating Balance Sheets as at June 30, 2007:


							Non-		Adjustments
	IMAX			Guarantor			Guarantor		and			Consolidated
	Corporation			Subsidiaries			Subsidiaries		Eliminations			Total
	As restated			As restated					As restated			As restated
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	10,061		$	5,935		$	314	$	—		$	16,310
Short-term investments		2,164			—			—		—			2,164
Accounts receivable		23,665			2,291			398		—			26,354
Financing receivables		62,103			689			—		—			62,792
Inventories		26,803			238			81		—			27,122
Prepaid expenses		2,536			495			21		—			3,052
Intercompany receivables		25,029			47,389			10,918		(83,336	)		—
Film assets		4,178			—			—		—			4,178
Property, plant and equipment		23,601			1,127			6		—			24,734
Other assets		12,174			—			—		—			12,174
Goodwill		39,027			—			—		—			39,027
Other intangible assets		2,526			—			—		—			2,526
Investments in subsidiaries		31,082			—			—		(31,082	)		—

Total assets	$	264,949		$	58,164		$	11,738	$	(114,418	)	$	220,433


Liabilities
Accounts payable	$	3,276		$	5,175		$	3	$	—		$	8,454
Accrued liabilities		53,248			8,099			227		—			61,574
Intercompany payables		61,785			44,603			6,204		(112,592	)		—
Deferred revenue		56,860			3,088			257		—			60,205
Senior Notes due 2010		160,000			—			—		—			160,000

Total liabilities		335,169			60,965			6,691		(112,592	)		290,233


Shareholders’ equity (deficit)
Capital stock		122,032			—			117		(117	)		122,032
Other equity / additional paid in capital / contributed surplus		2,366			46,960			—		(45,926	)		3,400
Deficit		(195,742	)		(49,147	)		4,930		44,217			(195,742	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		1,124			(614	)		—		—			510

Total shareholders’ equity (deficit)	$	(70,220	)	$	(2,801	)	$	5,047	$	(1,826	)	$	(69,800	)

Total liabilities & shareholders’ equity (deficit)	$	264,949		$	58,164		$	11,738	$	(114,418	)	$	220,433

In certain Guarantor Subsidiaries, accumulated losses have exceeded the original investment balance. As a result of applying equity accounting, the parent company has consequently reduced intercompany receivable balances with respect to these Guarantor Subsidiaries in the amounts of $29.9 million as at June 30, 2007.

Page 39

19.		Supplemental Consolidating Financial Information (cont’d)

		Supplemental Consolidating Balance Sheets as at December 31, 2006:


							Non-		Adjustments
	IMAX			Guarantor			Guarantor		and			Consolidated
	Corporation			Subsidiaries			Subsidiaries		Eliminations			Total
	As restated								As restated			As restated
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	16,402		$	8,556		$	165	$	—		$	25,123
Short-term investments		2,115			—			—		—			2,115
Accounts receivable		23,902			1,866			249		—			26,017
Financing receivables		63,831			2,047			—		—			65,878
Inventories		26,592			237			84		—			26,913
Prepaid expenses		3,098			312			22		—			3,432
Intercompany receivables		25,799			36,182			11,164		(73,145	)		—
Film assets		1,235			—			—		—			1,235
Property, plant and equipment		23,412			1,212			15		—			24,639
Other assets		10,365			—			—		—			10,365
Goodwill		39,027			—			—		—			39,027
Other intangible assets		2,547			—			—		—			2,547
Investments in subsidiaries		29,543			—			—		(29,543	)		—

Total assets	$	267,868		$	50,412		$	11,699	$	(102,688	)	$	227,291


Liabilities
Accounts payable
Accrued liabilities	$	4,259		$	7,164		$	3	$	—		$	11,426
Intercompany payables		49,792			8,293			209		—			58,294
Deferred revenue		60,049			35,601			6,306		(101,956	)		—
Senior Notes due 2010		52,420			3,261			122		—			55,803
Total liabilities		160,000			—			—		—			160,000

		326,520			54,319			6,640		(101,956	)		285,523


Shareholders’ equity (deficit)
Capital stock	$	122,024		$	—		$	117	$	(117	)	$	122,024
Other equity		1,903			46,960			—		(45,926	)		2,937
Deficit		(184,375	)		(50,253	)		4,942		45,311			(184,375	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		1,796			(614	)		—		—			1,182

Total shareholders’ equity (deficit)		(58,652	)		(3,907	)		5,059		(732	)		(58,232	)

Total liabilities & shareholders’ equity (deficit)	$	267,868		$	50,412		$	11,699	$	(102,688	)	$	227,291

In certain Guarantor Subsidiaries accumulated losses have exceeded the original investment balance. As a result of applying equity accounting, the parent company has consequently reduced intercompany receivable balances with respect to these Guarantor Subsidiaries in the amounts of $29.0 million.

Page 40

19.		Supplemental Consolidating Financial Information (cont’d)

		Supplemental Consolidating Statements of Operations for the three months ended June 30, 2007:


							Non-			Adjustments
	IMAX			Guarantor			Guarantor			and			Consolidated
	Corporation			Subsidiaries			Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Total
	As restated			As restated						As restated			As restated
Revenues
Equipment and product sales	$	6,773		$	177		$	2		$	(171	)	$	6,781
Services		10,409			6,482			164			(714	)		16,341
Rentals		1,595			66			11			—			1,672
Finance income		1,170			11			—			—			1,181
Other revenues		1,539			—			—			—			1,539

		21,486			6,736			177			(885	)		27,514

Cost of goods sold, services and rentals
Equipment and product sales		3,740			170			2			(99	)		3,813
Services		6,287			5,150			47			(786	)		10,698
Rentals		731			—			—			—			731
Other		19			—			—			—			19

		10,777			5,320			49			(885	)		15,261

Gross margin		10,709			1,416			128			—			12,253

Selling, general and administrative expenses		10,671			285			191			—			11,147
Research and development		1,121			—			—			—			1,121
Amortization of intangibles		141			—			—			—			141
Loss (income) from equity-accounted investees		(1,057	)		—			—			1,057			—
Receivable provisions, net of (recoveries)		(33	)		2			—			—			(31	)

Earnings (loss) from operations		(134	)		1,129			(63	)		(1,057	)		(125	)

Interest income		227			—			—			—			227
Interest expense		(4,375	)		—			—			—			(4,375	)

Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes		(4,282	)		1,129			(63	)		(1,057	)		(4,273	)
Provision for income taxes		(251	)		(9	)		—			—			(260	)

Net earnings (loss)	$	(4,533	)	$	1,120		$	(63	)	$	(1,057	)	$	(4,533	)

Page 41

19.		Supplemental Consolidating Financial Information (cont’d)

		Supplemental Consolidating Statements of Operations for the six months ended June 30, 2007:


							Non-			Adjustments
	IMAX			Guarantor			Guarantor			and			Consolidated
	Corporation			Subsidiaries			Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Total
	As restated			As restated						As restated			As restated
Revenues
Equipment and product sales	$	13,822		$	627		$	4		$	(598	)	$	13,855
Services		22,565			12,601			325			(1,493	)		33,998
Rentals		2,860			85			13			—			2,958
Finance income		2,304			63			—			—			2,367
Other revenues		1,539			—			—			—			1,539

		43,090			13,376			342			(2,091	)		54,717

Cost of goods sold, services and rentals
Equipment and product sales		7,613			598			4			(459	)		7,756
Services		12,275			11,224			123			(1,632	)		21,990
Rentals		1,291			—			—			—			1,291
Other		19			—			—			—			19

		21,198			11,822			127			(2,091	)		31,056

Gross margin		21,892			1,554			215			—			23,661

Selling, general and administrative expenses		20,753			489			227			—			21,469
Research and development		2,616			—			—			—			2,616
Amortization of intangibles		277			—			—			—			277
Loss (income) from equity-accounted investees		(1,094	)		—			—			1,094			—
Receivable provisions, net of (recoveries)		(23	)		(2	)		—			—			(25	)

Earnings (loss) from operations		(637	)		1,067			(12	)		(1,094	)		(676	)

Interest income		405			48			—			—			453
Interest expense		(8,624	)		—			—			—			(8,624	)

Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes		(8,856	)		1,115			(12	)		(1,094	)		(8,847	)
Provision for income taxes		(418	)		(9	)		—			—			(427	)

Net earnings (loss)	$	(9,274	)	$	1,106		$	(12	)	$	(1,094	)	$	(9,274	)

Page 42

19.		Supplemental Consolidating Financial Information (cont’d)

		Supplemental Consolidating Statements of Operations for the three months ended June 30, 2006:


							Non-			Adjustments
	IMAX			Guarantor			Guarantor			and			Consolidated
	Corporation			Subsidiaries			Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Total
	As restated			As restated						As restated			As restated
Revenues
Equipment and product sales	$	15,319		$	—		$	3		$	—		$	15,322
Services		13,301			7,314			174			(1,061	)		19,728
Rentals		1,430			47			8			—			1,485
Finance income		1,573			54			—			—			1,627

		31,623			7,415			185			(1,061	)		38,162

Cost of goods sold, services and rentals
Equipment and product sales		8,846			—			—			64			8,910
Services		7,906			6,220			83			(1,125	)		13,084
Rentals		473			—			—			—			473

		17,225			6,220			83			(1,061	)		22,467

Gross margin		14,398			1,195			102			—			15,695

Selling, general and administrative expenses		9,311			224			(2	)		—			9,533
Research and development		664			—			—			—			664
Amortization of intangibles		132			—			—			—			132
Loss (income) from equity-accounted investees		(1,072	)		—			—			1,072			—
Receivable provisions, net of (recoveries)		(252	)		—			—			—			(252	)

Earnings (loss) from operations		5,615			971			104			(1,072	)		5,618

Interest income		280			—			—			—			280
Interest expense		(4,239	)		(3	)		—			—			(4,242	)

Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes		1,656			968			104			(1,072	)		1,656
Recovery of income taxes		2			—			—			—			2

Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations		1,658			968			104			(1,072	)		1,658
Net earnings from discontinued operations		—			—			—			—			—

Net earnings (loss)	$	1,658		$	968		$	104		$	(1,072	)	$	1,658

Page 43

19.		Supplemental Consolidating Financial Information (cont’d)

		Supplemental Consolidating Statements of Operations for the six months ended June 30, 2006:


							Non-			Adjustments
	IMAX			Guarantor			Guarantor			and			Consolidated
	Corporation			Subsidiaries			Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Total
	As restated			As restated						As restated			As restated
Revenues
Equipment and product sales	$	23,090		$	—		$	6		$	—		$	23,096
Services		21,825			12,976			365			(1,969	)		33,197
Rentals		2,341			111			12			—			2,464
Finance income		2,631			108			—			—			2,739

		49,887			13,195			383			(1,969	)		61,496

Cost of goods sold, services and rentals
Equipment and product sales		13,014			—			5			97			13,116
Services		14,007			11,646			158			(2,066	)		23,745
Rentals		950			—			—			—			950

		27,971			11,646			163			(1,969	)		37,811

Gross margin		21,916			1,549			220			—			23,685

Selling, general and administrative expenses		19,583			402			80			—			20,065
Research and development		1,579			—			—			—			1,579
Amortization of intangibles		324			—			—			—			324
Loss (income) from equity-accounted investees		(1,284	)		—			—			1,284			—
Receivable provisions, net of (recoveries)		(109	)		—			—			—			(109	)

Earnings (loss) from operations		1,823			1,147			140			(1,284	)		1,826

Interest income		533			—			—			—			533
Interest expense		(8,397	)		(2	)		—			—			(8,399	)

Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes		(6,041	)		1,145			140			(1,284	)		(6,040	)
Recovery of (provision for) income taxes		1,695			—			(1	)		—			1,694

Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations		(4,346	)		1,145			139			(1,284	)		(4,346	)
Net earnings from discontinued operations		2,300			—			—			—			2,300

Net earnings (loss)	$	(2,046	)	$	1,145		$	139		$	(1,284	)	$	(2,046	)

Page 44

19.		Supplemental Consolidating Financial Information (cont’d)

		Supplemental Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2007:


							Non-			Adjustments
	IMAX			Guarantor			Guarantor			and			Consolidated
	Corporation			Subsidiaries			Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Total
	As restated			As restated						As restated			As restated
Cash provided by (used in):

Operating Activities

Net earnings (loss)	$	(9,274	)	$	1,106		$	(12	)	$	(1,094	)	$	(9,274	)
Items not involving cash:
Depreciation and amortization		6,038			205			11			—			6,254
Write-downs (recoveries)		(23	)		(2	)		—			—			(25	)
Loss (income) from equity-accounted investees		(1,094	)		—			—			1,094			—
Change in deferred income taxes		(149	)		—			—			—			(149	)
Stock and other non-cash compensation		2,006			—			—			—			2,006
Non-cash foreign exchange gain		(623	)		—			—			—			(623	)
Interest on short-term investments		(49	)		—			—			—			(49	)
Change in cash surrender value of life insurance		(16	)		—			—			—			(16	)
Investment in film assets		(5,590	)		—			—			—			(5,590	)
Changes in other non-cash operating assets and liabilities		5,092			(3,025	)		160			—			2,227
Net cash used in operating activities from discontinued operations		—			(775	)		—			—			(775	)

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		(3,682	)		(2,491	)		159			—			(6,014	)


Investing Activities
Purchases of short-term investments		(4,275	)		—			—			—			(4,275	)
Proceeds from maturities of short-term investments		4,274			—			—			—			4,274
Purchase of fixed assets		(601	)		(120	)		(2	)		—			(723	)
Increase in other assets		(374	)		—			—			—			(374	)
Increase in other intangible assets		(256	)		—			—			—			(256	)

Net cash used in investing activities		(1,232	)		(120	)		(2	)		—			(1,354	)


Financing Activities
Financing costs related to new Senior Notes		(1,431	)		—			—			—			(1,431	)
Common shares issued		8			—			—			—			8

Net cash used in financing activities		(1,423	)		—			—			—			(1,423	)


Effects of exchange rate changes on cash		(4	)		(10	)		(8	)		—			(22	)


Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents, during the period		(6,341	)		(2,621	)		149			—			(8,813	)

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		16,402			8,556			165			—			25,123


Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	10,061		$	5,935		$	314		$	—		$	16,310

Page 45

19.		Supplemental Consolidating Financial Information (cont’d)

		Supplemental Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2006:


							Non-			Adjustments
	IMAX			Guarantor			Guarantor			and			Consolidated
	Corporation			Subsidiaries			Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Total
	As restated			As restated						As restated			As restated
Cash provided by (used in):

Operating Activities
Net earnings (loss)	$	(2,046	)	$	1,145		$	139		$	(1,284	)	$	(2,046	)
Net earnings from discontinued operations		(2,300	)		—			—			—			(2,300	)
Items not involving cash:
Depreciation and amortization		7,370			267			1			—			7,638
Write-downs		(109	)		—			—			—			(109	)
Loss (income) from equity-accounted investees		(1,284	)		—			—			1,284			—
Change in deferred income taxes		(1,600	)		(4	)		—			—			(1,604	)
Stock and other non-cash compensation		2,554			—			—			—			2,554
Unrealized foreign exchange loss		(405	)		—			—			—			(405	)
Interest on short-term investments		(179	)		—			—			—			(179	)
Change in cash surrender value of life insurance		(6	)		—			—			—			(6	)
Investment in film assets		(5,696	)		—			—			—			(5,696	)
Changes in other non-cash operating assets and liabilities		(2,851	)		239			(90	)		—			(2,702	)

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		(6,552	)		1,647			50			—			(4,855	)


Investing Activities
Purchases of short-term investments		(10,322	)		—			—			—			(10,322	)
Proceeds from maturities of short-term investments		10,321			—			—			—			10,321
Purchase of fixed assets		(568	)		(169	)		(2	)		—			(739	)
Increase in other assets		(566	)		—			—			—			(566	)
Increase in other intangible assets		(309	)		—			—			—			(309	)
Net cash provided by investing activities from discontinued operations		3,493			—			—			—			3,493

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		2,049			(169	)		(2	)		—			1,878


Financing Activities
Common shares issued		286			—			—			—			286

Net cash provided by financing activities		286			—			—			—			286


Effects of exchange rate changes on cash		(53	)		7			(13	)		—			(59	)


Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents, during the period		(4,270	)		1,485			35			—			(2,750	)

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		17,402			6,728			194			—			24,324


Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	13,132		$	8,213		$	229		$	—		$	21,574

Page 46

IMAX CORPORATION

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

OVERVIEW

The principal business of IMAX Corporation together with its wholly-owned subsidiaries (the “Company”) is the design, manufacture, sale or lease of theater systems for large-format theaters including commercial theaters, museums and science centers, and destination entertainment sites. In addition, the Company specializes in digital and film based motion picture technologies, designs and manufactures high-end sound systems and produces, remasters and distributes large-format films. At June 30, 2007, there were 290 IMAX theaters operating in 40 countries.

The Company derives revenue principally from the sale or long-term lease of its theater systems and associated maintenance and extended warranty services, the provision of film production and digital re-mastering services, the distribution of certain films, and the provision of post-production services. The Company also derives revenue from the operation of its own theaters, camera rentals and the provision of aftermarket parts for its system components.

Important factors that the Company’s Co-Chief Executive Officers (“Co-CEOs”) use in assessing the Company’s business and prospects include the signing of new theater systems arrangements, revenue, gross margins from the Company’s operating segments, earnings from operations as adjusted for unusual items that the Company views as non-recurring and the success of strategic initiatives such as the securing of new film projects, particularly IMAX DMR films, the signing and financial performance of joint revenue sharing arrangements and the progress of the Company’s development of a digital projector and related technologies.

Accounting Policies and Estimates

The Company reports its results under United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“U.S. GAAP”).

The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates its estimates, including those related to accounts receivable, net investment in leases, inventories, property, plant and equipment, film assets, investments, other assets, intangible assets, income taxes, contingencies and litigation. Management bases its estimates on historical experience, future expectations and other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable at the date of the condensed consolidated financial statements. Actual results may differ from these estimates due to uncertainty involved in measuring, at a specific point in time, events which are continuous in nature, and the differences may be material. The Company’s significant accounting policies are discussed in note 2 to its audited consolidated financial statements in the Company’s Amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the “2006 Form 10-K/A”), and are summarized below.

Restatement of Previously Issued Financial Statements

In October 2007, the Company announced that, after a review of its real estate leases, it had identified certain errors related to its accounting practices as they relate to such leases for certain of the Company’s owned and operated theaters and office facilities. The Company conducted this review after performing an analysis of a rent-abatement agreement initiated in connection with the higher level of Finance Department oversight and awareness contemplated by Company’s ongoing remediation plan (see Item 4). The review focused on the Company’s historical accounting practice for recording the impact of rent holidays, abatements, escalation clauses and landlord construction allowances. The Company also reviewed its accounting for theater sponsorship revenue at its owned and operated theaters. As a result of the review, the Company concluded that certain of its prior practices were not in accordance with U.S. GAAP. In addition, the Company identified an error relating to revenue recognition, resulting from the Company’s review of one theater system arrangement which occurred in 2002, in response to comments received from the Staff of the Division of Corporate Finance of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). As a result of these errors, the Company has restated its condensed consolidated financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006.

Page 47

IMAX CORPORATION

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (cont’d)

OVERVIEW (cont’d)

Restatement of Previously Issued Financial Statements (cont’d)

In 2006, the Company had identified certain errors related to: (a) revenue recognition resulting from the Company’s review of its theater system arrangements over the past 5 year period ended December 31, 2006 in response to comments received from the staff of both the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and the Ontario Securities Commission (“OSC”) which indicated insufficient analysis of various sales and lease transactions and the accounting effect of certain contractual provisions within them; and misallocations of consideration to elements within certain multiple element arrangements; (b) capitalization of costs into inventory and films assets and amortization of film assets in accordance with Statement of Position 00-2, “Accounting by Producers or Distributors of Films” (“SOP 00-2” ); (c) income tax liabilities resulting from failure to make certain tax elections on a timely basis and (d) certain other items in note 3 of the condensed consolidated financial statements (referred to as the “First Restatement”). In addition, in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company recorded other adjustments related to prior periods’ unadjusted differences that had been deemed not to be material and adjustments related to prior periods recorded through 2006 opening shareholders’ deficit. The condensed consolidated financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 have been restated to reflect these error corrections under U.S. GAAP.

See note 3 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for additional details.

Critical Accounting Policies

The preparation of these condensed consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates its estimates, including those related to fair values associated with the individual elements in multiple element arrangements; residual values of leased theater systems; economic lives of leased assets; allowances for potential uncollectibility of accounts receivable, financing receivables and net investment in leases; provisions for inventory obsolescence; ultimate revenues for film assets; estimates of fair values for film assets, long-lived assets and goodwill; depreciable lives of property, plant and equipment; useful lives of intangible assets; pension plan assumptions; accruals for contingencies including tax contingencies; valuation allowances for deferred income tax assets; and, estimates of the fair value of stock-based payment awards. Management bases its estimates on historic experience, future expectations and other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable at the date of the condensed consolidated financial statements. Actual results may differ from these estimates due to uncertainty involved in measuring, at a specific point in time, events which are continuous in nature, and the differences may be material. The Company’s significant accounting policies are discussed in note 2 to the audited consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s 2006 Form 10-K/A.

The Company considers the following critical accounting policies to have the most significant effect on its estimates, assumptions and judgments:

Revenue Recognition

The Company generates revenue from various sources as follows:

	•		Design, manufacture, sale and lease of proprietary theater systems for IMAX theaters principally owned and operated by commercial and institutional customers located in 40 countries as of June 30, 2007;

	•		Production, digital re-mastering, post-production and/or distribution of certain films shown throughout the IMAX theater network;

	•		Operation of certain IMAX theaters primarily in the United States and Canada;

	•		Provision of other services to the IMAX theater network including ongoing maintenance and extended warranty services for IMAX theater systems; and

	•		Other activities, which includes short-term rental of cameras and aftermarket sales of projector system components.

Page 48

IMAX CORPORATION

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (cont’d)

OVERVIEW (cont’d)

Critical Accounting Policies (cont’d)

Revenue Recognition (cont’d)

Multiple Element Arrangements

The Company’s revenue arrangements with certain customers may involve multiple elements consisting of a theater system (projector, sound system, and screen system and, if applicable, a 3D glasses cleaning machine); services associated with the theater system including theater design support, supervision of installation, and projectionist training; a license to use of the IMAX brand; 3D glasses; maintenance and extended warranty services; and licensing of films. The Company evaluates all elements in an arrangement to determine what are considered typical deliverables for accounting purposes and which of the deliverables represent separate units of accounting based on the applicable accounting guidance in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 13, “Accounting for Leases” (“SFAS 13”); Financial Accounting Standard Board (“FASB”) Technical Bulletin No. 90-1, “Accounting for Separately Priced Extended Warranty and Product Maintenance Contracts” (“FTB 90-1”); American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Statement of Position 00-2, “Accounting by Producers or Distributors of Films”; and Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 00-21, “Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables” (“EITF 00-21”). If separate units of accounting are either required under the relevant accounting standards or determined to be applicable under EITF 00-21, the total consideration received or receivable in the arrangement is allocated based on the applicable guidance in the above noted standards.

Theater Systems

The Company has identified the projection system, and sound system, and screen system and, if applicable, the 3D glasses cleaning machine, theater design support, supervision of installation, projectionist training and the use of the IMAX brand to be a single deliverable and a single unit of accounting (the “System Deliverable”). When an arrangement does not include all the elements of a System Deliverable, the elements of the System Deliverable included in the arrangements are considered by the Company to be a single deliverable and a single unit of accounting. The Company is not responsible for the physical installation of the equipment in the customer’s facility; however, the Company supervises the installation by the customer. The customer has the right to use the IMAX brand from the date the Company and the customer enter into an arrangement.

The Company’s System Deliverable arrangements involve either a lease or a sale of the theater system. The consideration in the Company’s arrangements consist of upfront or initial payments made before and after the final installation of the theater system equipment and ongoing payments throughout the term of the lease or over a period of time, as specified in the arrangement. The ongoing payments provide for a fee which is the greater of a fixed amount or a certain percentage of the theater box-office. The amounts over the fixed minimum amounts are considered contingent payments. The Company’s arrangements are non-cancellable, unless the Company fails to perform its obligations. In the absence of a material default by the Company, there is no right to any remedy for the customer under the Company’s arrangements. If a material default by the Company exists, the customer has the right to terminate the arrangement and seek a refund only if the customer provides notice to the Company of a material default and only if the Company does not cure the default within a specified period.

Sales Arrangements

For sales arrangements, the revenue allocated to the System Deliverable is recognized in accordance with the SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, “Revenue Recognition” (“SAB 104”), when all of the following conditions have been met: (i) the projector, sound system and screen system have been installed and are in full working condition, (ii) the 3D glasses cleaning machine, if applicable, has been delivered, (iii) projectionist training has been completed and (iv) the earlier of (a) receipt of written customer acceptance certifying the completion of installation and run-in testing of the equipment and the completion of projectionist training or (b) public opening of the theater, provided there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, the price is fixed or determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured.

The initial revenue recognized consists of the initial payments received and the present value of any future initial payments and fixed minimum ongoing payments that have been attributed to this unit of accounting. Contingent fees in excess of the fixed minimum ongoing payments are recognized when reported by theater operators, provided collection is reasonably assured.

The Company has also agreed, on occasion, to sell equipment under lease or at the end of a lease term. Consideration agreed to for these lease buyouts is included in revenues from equipment and product sales, when the persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the fees are determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured.

Page 49

IMAX CORPORATION

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (cont’d)

OVERVIEW (cont’d)

Critical Accounting Policies (cont’d)

Revenue Recognition (cont’d)

Lease Arrangements

The Company uses the guidance in EITF Issue No. 01-8, “Determining Whether an Arrangement Contains a Lease” (“EITF 01-8”), to evaluate whether an arrangement is a lease within the scope of SFAS 13. Arrangements not within the scope of SFAS 13 are accounted for either as a sales or services arrangement, as applicable.

For lease arrangements, the Company determines the classification of the lease in accordance with SFAS 13. A lease arrangement that transfers substantially all of the benefits and risks incident to ownership of the equipment is classified as a sales-type lease based on the criteria established by SFAS 13; otherwise the lease is classified as an operating lease. Prior to commencement of the lease term for the equipment, the Company may modify certain payment terms or make concessions. If these circumstances occur, the Company reassesses the classification of the lease based on the modified terms and conditions.

For sales-type leases, the revenue allocated to the System Deliverable is recognized when the lease term commences, which the Company deems to be when all of the following conditions have been met (i) the projector, sound system and screen system have been installed and are in full working condition, (ii) the 3D glasses cleaning machine, if applicable, has been delivered, (iii) projectionist training has been completed and (iv) the earlier of (a) receipt of the written customer acceptance certifying the completion of installation and run-in testing of the equipment and the completion of projectionist training or (b) public opening of the theater, provided collectibility is reasonably assured.

The initial revenue recognized for sales-type leases consists of the initial rents received and the present value of future initial rents and fixed minimum ongoing rents computed at the interest rate implicit in the lease. Contingent rents in excess of the fixed minimum rents are recognized when reported by theater operators, provided collection is reasonably assured.

For operating leases, initial rents and fixed minimum ongoing rents are recognized as revenue on a straight-line basis over the lease term. For operating leases, the lease term is considered to commence when all of the following conditions have been met (i) the projector, sound system and screen system have been installed and are in full working condition, (ii) the 3D glasses cleaning machine, if applicable, has been delivered, (iii) projectionist training has been completed and (iv) the earlier of (a) receipt of the written customer acceptance certifying the completion of installation and run-in testing of the equipment and the completion of projectionist training or (b) public opening of the theater. Contingent fees in excess of fixed minimum ongoing fees are recognized as revenue when reported by theater operators, provided that collection is reasonably assured.

Joint Revenue Sharing Arrangements

For joint revenue sharing arrangements, where the Company receives a portion of the a theater’s box-office and concession revenue in exchange for placing a theater system at the theater operator’s venue, revenue is recognized when reported by the theater operator, provided that collection is reasonably assured. Revenue recognized related to these arrangements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 included in rental revenues was $0.6 million and $1.0 million, respectively (2006 — $0.2 million and $0.3 million).

The Company believes that its joint revenue sharing arrangements represent an effective way for it to deploy capital, add incremental theater growth and realize the benefits of network economics more quickly. The Company believes that by contributing the theater system, with the exhibitor responsible for the theater retrofit costs, it significantly lowers the capital cost for exhibitors to deploy an IMAX theater, which, in turn, expands the IMAX network more rapidly and provides the Company with an increasingly significant portion of the IMAX box office from its licensed theaters, as well as a continuing portion of the IMAX DMR film revenue from the film studio.

Page 50

IMAX CORPORATION

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (cont’d)

OVERVIEW (cont’d)

Critical Accounting Policies (cont’d)

Revenue Recognition (cont’d)

Terminations and Consensual Buyouts

The Company enters into theater system arrangements with customers that contain customer payment obligations prior to the scheduled installation of the theater system. During the period of time between signing and the installation of the theater system, which may extend several years, certain customers may be unable to, or elect not to, proceed with the theater system installation for a number of reasons including business considerations, or the inability to obtain certain consents, approvals or financing. Once the determination is made that the customer will not proceed with installation, the arrangement may be terminated under the default provisions of the arrangement or by mutual agreement between the Company and the customer (a “consensual buyout”). Terminations by default are situations when a customer does not meet the payment obligations under an arrangement and the Company retains the amounts paid by the customer which are recorded in Other revenues. Under a consensual buyout, the Company and the customer agree, in writing, to a settlement and to release each other of any further obligations under the arrangement or an arbitrated settlement is reached. Any initial payments retained or additional payments received by the Company are recognized as revenue when the settlement arrangements are executed and the cash is received, respectively. These termination and consensual buyout amounts are recognized in Other revenues.

In addition, since the introduction of IMAX MPX theater system components in 2003, the Company has agreed with several customers to convert their obligations for other theater system configurations that have not yet been installed to arrangements to acquire or lease the IMAX MPX theater system. The Company considers these situations to be a termination of the previous arrangement and origination of a new arrangement for the IMAX MPX theater system. The Company continues to defer an amount of any initial fees received from the customer such that aggregate of the fees deferred and the net present value of the future fixed initial and ongoing payments to be received from the customer equals the fair value of the IMAX MPX theater system to be leased or acquired by the customer. Any residual portion of the initial fees received from the customer for the terminated theater system is recorded in Other revenues at the time when the obligation for the original theater system is terminated and the IMAX MPX theater system arrangement is signed.

The Company may offer certain incentives to customers to complete theater system transactions including payment concessions or free services and products such as film licenses or 3D glasses. The payment concessions do not affect the classification of leases. Reductions in, and deferral, of payments are taken into account in determining the sales price either by a direct reduction in the sales price or a reduction of payments to be discounted in accordance with SFAS 13 or Accounting Principle Board Opinion No. 21, “Interest on Receivables and Payables” (“APB 21”). Free or discounted products and services are accounted for as separate units of accounting.

Maintenance and Extended Warranty Services

Maintenance and extended warranty services may be provided under a multiple element arrangement or as a separately priced contract. Revenue related to these services are deferred and recognized on a straight-line basis over the contract period. Maintenance and extended warranty services includes maintenance of the customer’s equipment and spare replacement parts. Under certain maintenance arrangements, maintenance services may include the provision of training services to the customer’s technicians. All costs associated with this maintenance program are expensed as incurred. A loss on maintenance and extended warranty services is recognized if the expected cost of providing the services under the contracts exceeds the related deferred revenue.

Film Production and IMAX DMR Services

In certain film arrangements, the Company produces a film financed by third parties, whereby the third party retains the copyright and the Company obtains exclusive distribution rights. Under these arrangements, the Company is entitled to a fixed fee or retains as a fee the excess of funding over cost of production (the “production fee”). The third parties receive a portion of the revenues received by the Company on distributing the film, which is charged to costs of revenue. The production fees are deferred and recognized as a rebate of the cost of the film based on the ratio of the Company’s distribution revenues recognized in the current period to the ultimate distribution revenues expected from the film.

Page 51

IMAX CORPORATION

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (cont’d)

OVERVIEW (cont’d)

Critical Accounting Policies (cont’d)

Revenue Recognition (cont’d)

Film Production and IMAX DMR Services (cont’d)

Revenue from film production services where the Company does not hold the associated distribution rights are recognized when performance of the contractual service is complete, provided there is persuasive evidence of an agreement, the fee is fixed or determinable and collection is reasonably assured.

Revenues from digitally re-mastering (IMAX DMR) film where third parties own or hold the copyrights and the rights to distribute the film are derived in the form of processing fees and recoupments calculated as a percentage of box-office receipts generated from the re-mastered films. Processing fees are recognized as revenues when the performance of the related re-mastering service is completed, provided there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, the fee is fixed or determinable and collection is reasonably assured. Recoupments calculated as a percentage of box-office receipts are recognized as revenue when reported by the third party that owns or holds the related film right, provided that collection is reasonably assured.

Losses on film production and IMAX DMR services are recognized in the period when it is determined that the Company’s estimate of total revenues to be realized by the Company will not exceed estimated total production costs to be expended on the film production and the cost of IMAX DMR services.

Film Distribution

Revenue from the licensing of films is recognized when a licensing arrangement exists, the film has been completed and delivered, the license period has begun, the fee is fixed and determinable and collection is reasonably assured. When license fees are based on a percentage of box-office receipts, revenue is recognized when reported by exhibitor, provided that collection is reasonably assured.

Film Post-Production Services

Revenues from post-production film services are recognized when performance of the contracted services is complete.

Theater Operations Revenue

The Company recognizes revenue from its owned and operated theaters resulting from box-office ticket and concession sales as tickets are sold, films are shown and upon the sale of various concessions. The sales are cash or credit card transactions with theatergoers based on fixed prices per seat or per concession item.

In addition, the Company enters into commercial arrangements with third party theater owners resulting in the sharing of profits and losses which are recognized when reported by such theaters. The Company also provides management services to certain theaters and recognizes revenue over the term of such services.

Other

Revenues on camera rentals are recognized over the rental period.

Revenue from the sale of 3D glasses is recognized when the 3D glasses have been delivered to the customer.

Other service revenues are recognized when the performance of contracted services is complete.

Allowances for Accounts Receivable and Financing Receivables

Allowances for doubtful accounts receivable are based on the Company’s assessment of the collectibility of specific customer balances, which is based upon a review of the customer’s credit worthiness, past collection history and the underlying asset value of the equipment, where applicable. Interest on overdue accounts receivable is recognized as income as the amounts are collected.

Page 52

IMAX CORPORATION

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (cont’d)

OVERVIEW (cont’d)

Critical Accounting Policies (cont’d)

Revenue Recognition (cont’d)

Allowances for Accounts Receivable and Financing Receivables (cont’d)

The Company monitors the performance of the theaters to which it has leased or sold theater systems which are subject to ongoing payments. When facts and circumstances indicate that there is a potential impairment in the net investment in lease or a financing receivable, the Company will evaluate the potential outcome of either renegotiations involving changes in the terms of the receivable or defaults on the existing lease or financed sale agreements. The Company will record a provision if it is considered probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due under the contractual terms of the arrangement or a renegotiated lease amount will cause a reclassification of the sales-type lease to an operating lease. When the net investment in lease or the financing receivable is impaired, the Company will recognize a valuation allowance for the difference between the carrying value in the investment and the present value of expected future cash flows discounted using the effective interest rate for the net investment in the lease or the financing receivable. If the Company expects to recover the theater system, the provision is equal to the excess of the carrying value of the investment over the fair value of the equipment. When the minimum lease payments for a lease are renegotiated and the lease continues to be classified as a sales-type lease, the reduction in payments is applied to reduce unearned finance income.

These provisions are adjusted when there is a significant change in the amount or timing of the expected future cash flows or actual cash flows differ from cash flow previously expected.

Once a net investment in lease or financing receivable is considered impaired, the Company does not recognize interest income until the collectibility issues are resolved. When finance income is not recognized, any payments received are applied against outstanding gross minimum lease amounts receivable or gross receivables from financed sales.

Inventory

In establishing the appropriate provisions for theater system and parts inventory, the Company makes estimates of future events and conditions, including the anticipated installation dates for the current backlog of theater system contracts, potential future signings, technology factors, growth prospects within the customers’ ultimate marketplace and the market acceptance of the Company’s current and pending theater system configurations and film library. If the Company’s estimates of these events and conditions prove to be incorrect, it could result in inventory losses in excess of the provisions determined to be adequate as at the balance sheet date.

The Company has, on occasion, reclaimed theater systems from customers who have not fulfilled their contractual obligations. The valuation of returned theater systems is an area where significant estimates are made by the Company. The Company considers the configuration of theater systems returned and its current and anticipated future backlog in determining the fair value of the returned theater systems. Returned systems from lease arrangements are valued in inventory at the lower of original cost, carrying value or fair value. Returned systems from sales arrangements are valued in inventory at the lower of carrying cost and fair value.

Asset Impairments

The Company performs an impairment test on its goodwill on an annual basis, coincident with the year-end, as well as in quarters where events or changes in circumstances suggest that the carrying amount may not be recoverable.

Goodwill impairment is assessed at the reporting unit level by comparing the unit’s carrying value, including goodwill, to the fair value of the unit. Significant estimates are involved in the impairment test. The carrying values of each unit are subject to allocations of certain assets and liabilities that the Company has applied in a systematic and rationale manner. The fair value of the Company’s units is assessed using a discounted cash flow model. The model is constructed using the Company’s budget and long-range plan as a base. The Company’s estimates of future cash flows involve anticipating future revenue streams, which contain many assumptions that are subject to variability, as well as estimates for future cash outlays, the amounts of which, and the timing of which are both uncertain. Actual results that differ from the Company’s budget and long-range plan could result in a significantly different result to an impairment test, which could impact earnings.

Long-lived asset impairment is performed at the lowest identifiable level of cash flows. For a significant portion of long-lived assets, this is the reporting segment unit level used for goodwill testing.

Page 53

IMAX CORPORATION

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (cont’d)

OVERVIEW (cont’d)

Critical Accounting Policies (cont’d)

Pension Plan and Postretirement Benefit Obligations Assumptions

The Company’s pension plan and postretirement benefit obligations and related costs are calculated using actuarial concepts, within the framework of SFAS No. 87, “Employer’s Accounting for Pensions” and SFAS No. 106, “Employer’s Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pension”. A critical assumption to this accounting is the discount rate. The Company evaluates this critical assumption annually or when otherwise required to by accounting standards. Other assumptions include factors such as expected retirement, mortality, rate of compensation increase, and estimates of inflation.

The discount rate enables the Company to state expected future cash payments for benefits as a present value on the measurement date. The guideline for setting this rate is a high-quality long-term corporate bond rate. A lower discount rate increases the present value of benefit obligations and increases pension expense. The Company’s discount rate was determined by considering the average of pension yield curves constructed of a large population of high-quality corporate bonds. The resulting discount rate reflects the matching of plan liability cash flows to the yield curves.

Deferred Tax Asset Valuation

As at June 30, 2007, the Company had net deferred income tax assets of $nil. The Company’s management assesses realization of its deferred tax assets based on all available evidence in order to conclude whether it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will be realized. Available evidence considered by the Company includes, but is not limited to, the Company’s historic operation results, projected future operating earnings results, reversing temporary differences, contracted sales backlog at June 30, 2007, changing business circumstances, and the ability to realize certain deferred tax assets through loss and tax credit carryback strategies. At June 30, 2007, the Company has determined that based on the weight of the available evidence, positive and negative, a full valuation allowance for the net deferred tax assets was required.

When there is a change in circumstances that causes a change in judgment about the realizability of the deferred tax assets, the Company would adjust all or a portion of the applicable valuation allowance in the period when such changes occur.

Tax Exposures

The Company is subject to ongoing tax examinations and assessments in various jurisdictions. Accordingly, the Company may incur additional tax expense based upon the outcomes of such matters. In addition, when applicable, the Company adjusts tax expense to reflect both favorable and unfavorable examination results. The Company’s ongoing assessments of the outcomes of examinations and related tax positions require judgment and can materially increase or decrease its effective rate as well as impact operating results. The Company compiles these assessments using the guidance of FIN 48, as discussed below.

Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109), (“FIN 48”), which clarifies the relevant criteria and approach for the recognition, de-recognition and measurement of uncertain tax positions. FIN 48 was effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2007. The Company has assessed the effects of the provisions of FIN 48. The cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle recorded as of January 1, 2007 was $2.1 million.

In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”, which is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and for interim periods within those years. This statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands the related disclosure requirements. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of this statement.

In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities — Including an Amendment of FASB Statements No. 115” (“SFAS 159”). SFAS 159 allows the irrevocable election of fair value as the initial and subsequent measurement attribute for certain financial assets and liabilities and other items on an instrument-by-instrument basis. Changes in fair value would be reflected in earnings as they occur. The objective of SFAS 159 is to improve financial reporting by providing entities with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. SFAS 159 is effective as of the beginning of the first fiscal year beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently evaluating if it will elect the fair value option for any of its eligible financial instruments and other items.

Page 54

IMAX CORPORATION

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (cont’d)

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

As identified in note 15 to the condensed consolidated financial statements, the Company has six reportable segments identified by category of product sold or service provided: IMAX systems; film production and IMAX DMR; film distribution; film post-production; theater operations; and other. The IMAX systems segment designs, manufactures, sells or leases and maintains IMAX theater projection system equipment. The film production and IMAX DMR segment produces films and performs film re-mastering services. The film distribution segment distributes films for which the Company has distribution rights. The film post-production segment provides film post-production and film print services. The theater operations segment owns and operates certain IMAX theaters. The other segment includes camera rentals and other miscellaneous items. The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in note 2 to the audited consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s 2006 Form 10-K/A.

The Company’s Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations have been organized and discussed with respect to the above stated segments. Management feels that a discussion and analysis based on its segments is significantly more relevant as the Company’s consolidated statements of operations caption combines results from several segments.

Three Months Ended June 30, 2007 Versus Three Months Ended June 30, 2006

The Company reported a net loss from continuing operations before income taxes of $4.3 million or $0.11 per share on a diluted basis and a net loss from continuing operations after taxes of $4.5 million or $0.11 per share on a diluted basis for the second quarter of 2007. For the second quarter of 2006, the Company reported net earnings from continuing operations before income taxes of $1.7 million or $0.04 per share on a diluted basis and net earnings from continuing operations after taxes of $1.7 million or $0.04 per share on diluted basis.

Revenue

The Company’s revenues for the second quarter of 2007 decreased by 27.9% to $27.5 million from $38.1 million in the same period last year.

The following table sets forth the breakdown of revenue by category:


	Three months ended June 30,
	2007		2006
(In thousands of U.S. dollars)	As restated		As restated
IMAX Systems Revenue
Sales and sales-type leases⁽¹⁾	$	7,257	$	14,172
Ongoing rent⁽²⁾		2,930		3,037
Maintenance		3,797		3,913

		13,984		21,122


Films Revenue
Production and IMAX DMR		3,801		4,063
Distribution		2,692		4,639
Post-production		1,472		3,042

		7,965		11,744


Theater Operations		4,579		4,071


Other Revenue		986		1,225

	$	27,514	$	38,162


(1)		Includes initial rents and fees and the present value of fixed minimum rents and fees from equipment, sales and sales-type lease transactions.

(2)		Includes rental income from operating leases, revenues from joint revenue sharing arrangements, contingent rents from sales-type leases, contingent fees from sales arrangements and finance income.

Page 55

IMAX CORPORATION

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (cont’d)

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (cont’d)

Three Months Ended June 30, 2007 Versus Three Months Ended June 30, 2006 (cont’d)

Revenue (cont’d)

IMAX systems revenue decreased to $14.0 million in the second quarter of 2007 from $21.1 million in the second quarter of 2006, a decrease of 33.8%. Revenue from sales and sales-type leases decreased to $7.3 million in the second quarter of 2007 from $14.2 million in the second quarter of 2006, a decrease of 48.8%, mainly due to a lower number of theater system recognitions in 2007 versus 2006 (4 in 2007 versus 9 in 2006), partially offset by $1.5 million in settlement revenues from termination of agreements recognized during of the second quarter of 2007 versus $nil in 2006.

The Company recognized revenue on four theater systems which qualified as either sales or sales-type leases in the second quarter of 2007 versus nine in the second quarter of 2006. There were two new theater systems with a value of $3.6 million recognized into revenue in the second quarter of 2007 compared to six new theater systems with a total value of $9.2 million recognized in the second quarter of 2006. Two of the theater systems recognized in 2007 were used theater systems versus three used theater systems in the second quarter of 2006. The aggregate sales value of the used systems in 2007 totaled $2.4 million compared to $3.2 million for the used systems in the second quarter of 2006.

Average revenue per sales and sales-type lease systems increased slightly to $1.5 million from $1.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007 compared to the same period of 2006.

The table below illustrates the mix of theater systems recognized in the second quarter of 2007 compared to the same period in 2006.


	Three months ended
	June 30,
	2007	2006
		As restated
Sales and Sales-type lease systems recognized
IMAX 3D GT	2	4
IMAX 3D SR	1	—
IMAX 3D MPX	1	5

	4	9

Ongoing rent revenue decreased slightly to $2.9 million in the second quarter of 2007 from $3.0 million in 2006, a decrease of 3.8% primarily due to the recording of non-recurring finance income of $0.5 million in the second quarter of 2006. Revenues from joint revenue sharing arrangements, included in ongoing rent, increased from $0.2 million in the second quarter of 2006 to $0.6 million in the second quarter of 2007. The Company installed three new joint revenue sharing theaters in the second quarter of 2007, for a total of eight to date. Maintenance revenue for the quarter was $3.8 million as compared to $3.9 million in the prior year.

Film segment revenues decreased to $8.0 million in the second quarter of 2007 from $11.7 million in the second quarter of 2006. Film production and IMAX DMR revenues decreased to $3.8 million in the second quarter of 2007 from $4.1 million in the second quarter of 2006. The decrease in film production and IMAX DMR revenues was due primarily to slightly lower IMAX DMR revenues from the fact that two IMAX DMR films played in the second quarter of 2007 (300: An IMAX Experience, released in early March 2007 and completed its run in the second quarter of 2007, and Spider-Man 3: An IMAX Experience, which opened in May 2007), compared to three IMAX DMR films in the second quarter of 2006 (V for Vendetta: An IMAX Experience, Poseidon: An IMAX Experience and Superman Returns: An IMAX Experience). Film distribution revenues decreased to $2.7 million in the second quarter of 2007 from $4.6 million in the second quarter of 2006 due to stronger performances of Magnificent Desolation and Deep Sea 3D in the second quarter of 2006 compared to 2007. Film post-production revenues decreased to $1.5 million in the second quarter of 2007 from $3.0 million in the second quarter of 2006, mainly due to a decrease in third party business at the Company’s post-production unit.

Page 56

IMAX CORPORATION

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (cont’d)

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (cont’d)

Three Months Ended June 30, 2007 Versus Three Months Ended June 30, 2006 (cont’d)

Revenue (cont’d)

Theater operations revenue increased to $4.6 million in the second quarter of 2007 from $4.1 million in the second quarter of 2006, due to an increase in average ticket prices of approximately 14%.

Other revenue decreased to $1.0 million in the second quarter of 2007 compared to $1.2 million in the same period in 2006. Other revenue primarily includes revenue generated from the Company’s camera and rental business and after market sales of projection system parts.

Outlook

Theater system installations slip from period to period in the course of the Company’s business, and the Company has seen a significant number of theater system installations originally anticipated for the third and fourth quarters of 2006 move to anticipated installations for 2007 and beyond. The Company currently has 17 complete theater systems in its backlog that it anticipates will be installed in the second half of 2007, however it cautions that slippages remain a recurring and unpredictable part of its business.

The Company has signed agreements with Sony Pictures and Warner Bros. Pictures (“WB”) respectively, for the release of IMAX DMR versions of Spider-Man 3: The IMAX Experience which was released in May of 2007, 300: The IMAX Experience which was released in March 2007 and Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix: An IMAX 3D Experience which was released in July of 2007. The Company, in conjunction with Paramount Pictures, Shangri-La Entertainment and Concert Productions International, has signed an agreement to release the upcoming Rolling Stones concert film Shine a Light: An IMAX Experience. In November 2007, the Company in conjunction with Paramount Pictures, Shangri-La Entertainment and WB, will release Beowulf: An IMAX 3D Experience. The Company also has an agreement with WB to release The Dark Knight: The IMAX Experience, the next installment of WB’s Batman franchise, in July 2008. In conjunction with WB, the Company has also commenced production on a sequel to Deep Sea 3D, scheduled for release in 2009.

The Company supplements its sale and lease of theater systems by offering clients joint revenue sharing arrangements, whereby the Company contributes its theater systems, accounted for at its manufactured cost for manufactured components and at the Company’s cost for purchased components. Under some arrangements, the client contributes its retrofitted auditorium and there is a negotiated split of box-office revenues and concession revenues. The Company believes that, by offering such arrangements where exhibitors do not need to pay the initial capital required in a lease or a sale, the Company’s theater network can be expanded more rapidly and provide the Company with a significant portion of the IMAX box-office receipts from its theaters, as well as greater revenue from the studios releasing IMAX DMR films, for which the Company typically receives a percentage of the studio’s box-office receipts. In addition to the 5 joint revenue sharing arrangements in operation at the end of the first quarter 2007, the Company installed three additional joint revenue sharing theaters during the second quarter of 2007.

Page 57

IMAX CORPORATION

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (cont’d)

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (cont’d)

Three Months Ended June 30, 2007 Versus Three Months Ended June 30, 2006 (cont’d)

Outlook (cont’d)

The Company believes that digital technology has evolved sufficiently that it can develop an IMAX digital projection system that delivers high quality imagery consistent with the Company’s brand to deliver to theaters by early 2009. The Company believes that the dramatic print cost savings that would result from an IMAX digital system could lead to more profitability for the Company by increasing the number of films released to the IMAX network, which in turn could result in more theaters in the Company’s network, more profits per theater and more profits for studios amortizing their films over the network. There are a number of risks inherent in the Company’s digital strategy including the risk of exhibitors delaying theater system purchases during the Company’s transition period to digital, and the need to finance the Company’s investments necessary for implementing this strategy. In addition, the Company’s theater system contracts are increasingly including provisions providing for customer upgrades to digital systems, when available. The accounting impact of such provisions may include the deferral of some or all of the revenue (though not the cash) associated with such system until the time of such digital upgrade. Such deferral could result in a significant increase in the Company’s deferred revenue accounts and a significant decrease in the Company’s reported profits prior to the delivery of the digital upgrade. The Company’s goal is to create a digital product that provides a differentiated experience to moviegoers that is consistent with what they have come to expect from the IMAX brand. The Company believes that transitioning from a film-based platform to a digital platform for a large portion of its customer base is compelling for a number of reasons. The savings to the studios as a result of eliminating film prints are considerable, as the typical cost of an IMAX film print ranges from $22,500 per 2D print to $45,000 per 3D print. Removing those costs will significantly increase the profit of an IMAX release for a studio which, the Company believes, provides more incentive for studios to release their films to IMAX theaters. The Company similarly believes that economics change favorably for its exhibition clients as a result of a digital transition, since lower print costs and the increased programming flexibility that digital delivery provides should allow theaters to program three to four additional IMAX DMR films per year, thereby increasing both customer choice and total box-office revenue. Finally, digital transmission allows for the opportunity to show attractive alternate programming, such as live events like the Super Bowl or World Cup, in the immersive environment of an IMAX theater.

Gross Margin

The gross margin across all segments in the second quarter of 2007 was $12.2 million, or 44.5% of total revenue, compared to $15.7 million, or 41.1% of total revenue in the second quarter of 2006.

IMAX theater systems margin, excluding the impact of settlement revenues from termination of arrangements, was 52.6% in the second quarter of 2007, compared to 52.3% in the second quarter of 2006. Gross margins on sale of new systems were 63.5% in the second quarter of 2007 compared to 55.9% in the prior year quarter due mainly to the product mix sold. Gross margins on the sale of two used systems, in the second quarter of 2007 were 58.6% compared to 56.7% for the three used systems recognized in the prior year quarter.

The Company’s gross margin from its film segment decreased in the second quarter of 2007 by $0.2 million. Film production and IMAX DMR gross margin increased by $0.3 million due primarily to the improved margins from the successful releases of 300: An IMAX Experience and Spider-Man 3: An IMAX Experience versus the films released in the second quarter of 2006. Film distribution margin decreased by $0.6 million primarily due to higher margins earned on Magnificent Desolation and Deep Sea 3D in 2006 versus 2007. Film post-production gross margin increased by $0.1 million primarily due to a change in mix between internal and third party business.

Theater operations margin decreased $0.4 million in the second quarter of 2007 as compared to second quarter of 2006 primarily due to higher film rentals fees (related to the strong box office performance of 300: The IMAX Experience and Spider-Man 3: An IMAX Experience) partially offset by the impact of higher revenues.

Other gross margin increased slightly by $0.1 million in the second quarter of 2007, primarily as a result of increased activity from the Company’s camera and rental business.

Page 58

IMAX CORPORATION

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (cont’d)

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (cont’d)

Three Months Ended June 30, 2007 Versus Three Months Ended June 30, 2006 (cont’d)

Other

Selling, general and administrative expenses were $11.1 million in the second quarter of 2007, which included $1.2 million of professional and legal expenses the Company incurred costs to respond to inquiries made by the SEC and OSC, as compared to $9.6 million in 2006. Compensation expenses increased by $0.3 million in the second quarter of 2007 over 2006 due to higher salary costs. There was a decrease in non-cash stock-based compensation including stock options, stock appreciation rights and restricted shares issued to employees of $0.4 million from 2006. Travel and entertainment expenses decreased by $0.3 million in the second quarter of 2007 compared to the second quarter of 2006. The Company recorded a foreign exchange gain of $0.5 million in the second quarter of 2007, compared to a gain of $0.4 million in the second quarter of 2006. The Company records foreign exchange translation gains and losses primarily on a portion of its financing receivable balances which are denominated in Canadian dollars, Euros and Japanese Yen.

Receivable provisions net of recoveries for accounts receivable and financing receivables amounted to a net recovery of less than $0.1 million in the second quarter of 2007, compared to a net recovery of $0.3 million in the second quarter of 2006.

Interest income decreased slightly to $0.2 million in the second quarter of 2007 compared to $0.3 million in the prior year quarter.

Interest expense increased slightly to $4.4 million in the second quarter of 2007 compared to $4.2 in the second quarter of 2006. Included in interest expense is the amortization of deferred finance costs in the amount of $0.3 million and $0.3 million in the second quarter of 2007 and 2006, respectively, relating to the Company’s 9.625% Senior Notes due December 1, 2010 (the “Senior Notes”). The Company’s policy is to defer and amortize all the costs relating to a debt financing over the life of the debt instrument.

Income Taxes

The Company’s effective tax rate differs from the statutory tax rate and will vary from year to year primarily as a result of numerous permanent differences, investments and other tax credits, the provision for income taxes at different rates in foreign and other provincial jurisdictions, enacted statutory tax rate increases or reductions in the year, changes in the Company’s valuation allowance based on the Company’s recoverability assessments of deferred tax assets, and favorable or unfavorable resolution of various tax examinations. As of June 30, 2007, the Company had a gross deferred income tax asset of $57.3 million, against which the Company is carrying a $57.3 million valuation allowance.

Research and Development

Research and development expenses amounted to $1.1 million in the second quarter of 2007 compared to $0.7 million in 2006. The expenses primarily reflect research and development activities pertaining to a new digitally-based theater projector. Through research and development, the Company continues to design and develop cinema-based equipment, software and other technologies to enhance its product offering. The Company believes that the motion picture industry will be affected by the development of digital technologies, particularly in the areas of content creation (image capture), post-production (editing and special effects), distribution and display. Consequently, the Company has made significant investments in digital technologies, including the development of proprietary, patent-pending technology related to a digitally-based projector, as well as technologies to digitally enhance image resolution and quality of motion picture films, and convert monoscopic (2D) to stereoscopic (3D) images. The Company also holds a number of patents, patents pending and intellectual property rights in these areas.

The motion picture industry is in the early stages of transitioning from film projection to digital projection, and the Company itself is developing a digitally-based projector. In recent years, a number of companies have introduced digital 3D projection technology and a small number of Hollywood features have been exhibited in 3D using these technologies. The Company believes that its many competitive strengths, including the IMAX^® brand name, the quality and immersiveness of The IMAX Experience, its IMAX DMR technology and its patented theater geometry significantly differentiate the Company’s 3D presentations from any other 3D presentations.

Page 59

IMAX CORPORATION

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (cont’d)

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (cont’d)

Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 Versus Six Months Ended June 30, 2006

The Company reported a net loss from continuing operations before income taxes of $8.8 million or $0.23 per share on a diluted basis and a net loss from continuing operations after taxes of $9.3 million or $0.23 per share on a diluted basis for the six months ended June 30, 2007. For the six months ended June 30, 2006, the Company reported net loss from continuing operations before income taxes of $6.0 million or $0.15 per share on a diluted basis and net loss from continuing operations after taxes of $4.3 million or $0.11 per share on diluted basis.

Revenue

The Company’s revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2007 decreased 11.0% to $54.7 million from $61.5 million in the same period last year.

The following table sets forth the breakdown of revenue by category:


	Six months ended
	June 30,
	2007		2006
(In thousands of U.S. dollars)	As restated		As restated
IMAX Systems Revenue
Sales and sales-type leases⁽¹⁾	$	13,669	$	20,943
Ongoing rent⁽²⁾		5,542		5,290
Maintenance		7,891		7,686

		27,102		33,919


Films Revenue
Production and IMAX DMR		8,393		5,160
Distribution		6,102		8,063
Post-production		2,546		4,524

		17,041		17,747


Theater Operations		9,066		7,763


Other Revenue		1,508		2,067

	$	54,717	$	61,496


(1)		Includes initial rents and fees and the present value of fixed minimum rents and fees from equipment, sales and sales-type lease transactions.

(2)		Includes rental income from operating leases, revenues from joint revenue sharing arrangements, contingent rents from sales-type leases, contingent fees from sales arrangements and finance income.

IMAX systems revenue decreased to $27.1 million in the six months ended June 30, 2007 from $33.9 million in the six months ended June 30, 2006, a decrease of 20.1%. Revenue from sales and sales-type leases decreased to $13.7 million in the six months ended June 30, 2007 from $20.9 million in the six months ended June 30, 2006, a decrease of 34.7%, mainly due to a lower number of theater system recognitions (9 in 2007 versus 14 in 2006) in the period. The Company also recognized $1.5 million in settlement revenue during the six months ended June 30, 2007 versus $nil in 2006.

The Company recognized revenue on nine theater systems which qualified as either sales or sales-type leases in the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to fourteen in the same period in 2006. There were six new theater systems with a value of $9.6 million recognized into revenue in the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to eight new theater systems with a total value of $13.5 million recognized in the six months ended June 30, 2006. Three of the theater systems recognized in 2007 were used theater systems versus six used theater systems in the six months ended June 30, 2006. The aggregate sales value of the used systems in 2007 totaled $2.9 million compared to $5.7 million for the used systems in the six months ended June 30, 2006.

Page 60

IMAX CORPORATION

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (cont’d)

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (cont’d)

Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 Versus Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 (cont’d)

Revenue (cont’d)

Average revenue per sales and sales-type lease systems remained consistent at $1.4 million for the six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006.

The table below illustrates the mix of theater systems recognized in the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to the same period in 2006.


	Six months ended
	June 30,
	2007	2006
		As restated
Sales and Sales-type lease systems recognized
IMAX 2D GT	1	1
IMAX 3D GT	2	8
IMAX 2D SR	1	—
IMAX 3D SR	1	—
IMAX 3D MPX	4	5

	9	14

Ongoing rent revenue increased to $5.5 million in the six months ended June 30, 2007 from $5.3 million in 2006, an increase of 4.8%. Ongoing rent revenue for the first six months of 2006 included the recording of non-recurring finance income of $0.5 million. Absent this non recurring increase, ongoing rent revenue increase 17% over the prior year. Revenues from joint revenue sharing arrangements, included in ongoing rent, increased from $0.3 million in the six months ended June 30, 2006 to $1.0 million in the six months ended June 30, 2007. The Company installed three new joint revenue sharing theaters in the second quarter of 2007. Maintenance revenue increased 2.7% to $7.9 million over the prior year due to an increase in the theater network. The Company expects to see an increase in 2007 compared to 2006 in both ongoing rent and maintenance revenue as the Company’s theater network continues to grow in 2007.

Film segment revenues decreased to $17.0 million in the six months ended June 30, 2007 from $17.7 million in the six months ended June 30, 2006, due primarily to a decrease in film distribution and post-production revenues, offset by an increase in IMAX DMR revenues. Film production and IMAX DMR revenues increased to $8.4 million in the six months ended June 30, 2007 from $5.2 million in the six months ended June 30, 2006. The increase in film production and IMAX DMR revenues was due primarily to IMAX DMR revenues gross box office performance of Spider-Man 3: An IMAX Experience, released in 2007, 300: An IMAX Experience, released in March 2007 and the continued success of Night at the Museum: An IMAX Experience, released in December 2006, Happy Feet: An IMAX Experience, released November 2006, which together performed better than the 2006 release of Superman Returns: An IMAX Experience, released in June 2006, Poseidon: An IMAX Experience, released in May 2006, V for Vendetta: An IMAX Experience, released in March 2006, and the first quarter performance of Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire: The IMAX Experience, released in November 2005. Film distribution revenues decreased to $6.1 million in the six months ended June 30, 2007 from $8.1 million in the six months ended June 30, 2006 due to lower distribution revenues from Magnificent Desolation and Deep Sea 3D in 2007 compared to 2006. Film post-production revenues decreased to $2.5 million in the six months ended June 30, 2007 from $4.5 million in the six months ended June 30, 2006, mainly due to a decrease in third party business at the Company’s post-production unit.

Theater operations revenue increased to $9.1 million in the six months ended June 30, 2007 from $7.8 million in the six months ended June 30, 2006, due to an increase in average ticket prices of approximately 20%.

Other revenue decreased to $1.5 million in the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to $2.1 million in the same period in 2006. Other revenue primarily includes revenue generated from the Company’s camera and rental business and after market sales of projection system parts.

Page 61

IMAX CORPORATION

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (cont’d)

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (cont’d)

Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 Versus Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 (cont’d)

Gross Margin

The gross margin across all segments in the six months ended June 30, 2007 was $23.7 million, or 43.2% of total revenue, compared to $23.7 million, or 38.5% of total revenue in the six months ended June 30, 2006. The increase in gross margin for the six months ended June 30, 2007 is largely driven by the improved performance in the film segment.

IMAX theater systems margin, excluding the impact of settlement revenues from termination of arrangements, was 55.2% in the six months ended June 30, 2007, compared to 54.3% experienced in the six months ended June 30, 2006. The increase in gross margin of IMAX theater systems is due to a different mix of theater systems sold in the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to the same period in 2006. Gross margins on sale of new systems was 57.9% in the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to 52.5% in the prior year. Gross margins on the sale of used systems in the six months ended June 30, 2007 was 65.7% compared to 68.2% for the used systems recognized in the same period of 2006.

The Company’s gross margin from its film segment increased in the six months ended June 30, 2007 by $3.2 million. Film production and IMAX DMR gross margin increased by $3.2 million due primarily to the successful releases of Spider-Man 3: An IMAX Experience and 300: An IMAX Experience and Night at the Museum: An IMAX Experience as compared to the films released last year. Film distribution margin increased by $0.2 million primarily due to higher ongoing margins earned on Deep Sea 3D in 2007 over 2006 due to the Company’s expensing of associated film exploitation costs in the first and second quarters of 2006. Film post-production gross margin decreased by $0.2 million to $1.2 million.

Theater operations margin decreased $0.5 million in the six months ended June 30, 2007 as compared to six months ended June 30, 2006 primarily due to higher film rentals fees (related to the strong box office performance of 300: The IMAX Experience and Spider-Man 3: An IMAX Experience) partially offset by the impact of higher revenues.

Other gross margin remained consistent at negative $0.1 million for both the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006.

Other

Selling, general and administrative expenses were $21.5 million in the first six months of 2007, which included $2.0 million of professional and legal expenses the Company incurred to respond to inquiries made by the SEC and OSC, compared to $20.1 million in 2006. The $0.6 million decrease in SG&A when subtracting the above-referenced legal fees, includes a decrease in the Company’s SERP pension expense as it amended the SERP on March 8, 2006 to reduce certain benefits, resulted in savings of $0.4 million in compensation expense for six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to the same period in 2006. There was also an increase in professional fees of $0.3 million in the six months ended June 30, 2007 due to increased spending on restatement related activities, which were partially offset by reduced spending for SFAS 123R implementation and SERP amendment, which were not repeated in 2007. Compensation expenses decreased by $0.5 million during the six months ended June 30, 2007 as the Company incurred lower severance costs and employee bonus accruals which offset higher salary and compensation costs. There was a decrease in non-cash stock-based compensation for employees of $0.3 million during the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to the prior year period. Non-cash stock-based compensation includes stock options, stock appreciation rights and restricted shares issued to employees. The Company recorded a foreign exchange gain of $0.6 million in the six months ended June 30, 2007, compared to a gain of $0.4 million in the six months ended June 30, 2006. The Company records foreign exchange translation gains and losses primarily on a portion of its financing receivable balances which are denominated in Canadian dollars, Euros and Japanese Yen.

Receivable provisions net of recoveries for accounts receivable and financing receivables amounted to a net recovery of less than $0.1 million in the six months ended June 30, 2007, compared to a net recovery of $0.1 million in the six months ended June 30, 2006.

Interest income remained consistent at $0.5 million for both the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006.

Interest expense increased slightly to $8.6 million in the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to $8.4 million in the six months ended June 30, 2006. Included in interest expense is the amortization of deferred finance costs in the amount of $0.6 million and $0.6 million in the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, relating to the Senior Notes due 2010. The Company’s policy is to defer and amortize all the costs relating to a debt financing over the life of the debt instrument.

Page 62

IMAX CORPORATION

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (cont’d)

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (cont’d)

Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 Versus Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 (cont’d)

Research and Development

Research and development expenses amounted to $2.6 million in the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to $1.6 million in 2006. The expenses primarily reflect research and development activities pertaining to a new digitally-based theater projector. Through research and development, the Company continues to design and develop cinema-based equipment, software and other technologies to enhance its product offering. The Company believes that the motion picture industry will be affected by the development of digital technologies, particularly in the areas of content creation (image capture), post-production (editing and special effects), distribution and display. Consequently, the Company has made significant investments in digital technologies, including the development of proprietary, patent-pending technology related to a digitally-based projector, as well as technologies to digitally enhance image resolution and quality of motion picture films, and convert monoscopic (2D) to stereoscopic (3D) images. The Company also holds a number of patents, patents pending and intellectual property rights in these areas.

The motion picture industry is in the early stages of transitioning from film projection to digital projection, and the Company itself is developing a digitally-based projector. In recent years, a number of companies have introduced digital 3D projection technology and a small number of Hollywood features have been exhibited in 3D using these technologies. The Company believes that its many competitive strengths, including the IMAX^® brand name, the quality and immersiveness of The IMAX Experience, its IMAX DMR technology and its patented theater geometry, significantly differentiate the Company’s 3D presentations from any other 3D presentations.

Discontinued Operations

On December 23, 2003, the Company closed its owned and operated Miami IMAX theater. The Company completed its abandonment of assets and removal of its projection system from the theater in the first quarter of 2004, with no financial impact. The Company was involved in an arbitration proceeding with the landlord of the theater with respect to the amount owing to the landlord by the Company for lease and guarantee obligations. The amount of loss to the Company had been estimated as between $0.9 million and $2.3 million. Prior to 2006, the Company paid out $0.8 million with respect to amounts owing to the landlord. The Company paid out an additional $0.1 million and also accrued $0.8 million in net loss from discontinued operations related to Miami IMAX Theater in 2006. On January 4, 2007, as a result of a settlement negotiated between both parties, the Company paid out a final $0.8 million, extinguishing its obligations to the landlord.

On December 29, 2005, the Company and a previously wholly-owned subsidiary, Digital Projection International, entered into an agreement to settle its loan agreements in exchange for a payment of $3.5 million. During the six months ended June 30, 2006, the Company recognized $2.3 million in income from discontinued operations as a result of this settlement.

Page 63

IMAX CORPORATION

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (cont’d)

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Credit Facility

Under the indenture dated as of December 4, 2003, and as thereafter amended and supplemented, governing the Company’s Senior Notes (the “Indenture”), the Company is permitted to incur indebtedness pursuant to a credit agreement, or the refinancing or replacement of a credit facility, provided that the aggregate principal amount of indebtedness thereunder outstanding at any time does not exceed the greater of a) $30,000,000 minus the amount of any such indebtedness retired with the proceeds of an Asset Sale and (b) 15% of Total Assets, as defined in the Indenture, of the Company. The Indenture also permits the Company to incur indebtedness solely in respect of performances, surety or appeal bonds, letters of credit and letters of guarantee as required in the ordinary course of business in accordance with customary industry practices. On February 6, 2004, the Company entered into a Loan Agreement for a secured revolving credit facility as amended on June 30, 2005 and as further amended by the Second Amendment to the Loan Agreement which was entered into with effect from May 16, 2006 (the “Credit Facility”). The Credit Facility is a revolving credit facility expiring on October 31, 2009 with an optional one year renewal thereafter contingent upon approval by the lender, permitting maximum aggregate borrowings equal to the lesser of (i) $40.0 million, (ii) a collateral calculation based on percentages of the book values for the Company’s net investment in sales-type leases, financing receivables, finished goods inventory allocated to backlog contracts and the appraised values of the expected future cash flows related to operating leases and of the Company’s owned real property, reduced by certain accruals and accounts payable and (iii) a minimum level of trailing cash collections in the preceding twenty-six week period ($55.3 million as of June 30, 2007), and is subject to certain limitations under the Company’s Senior Notes and is reduced for outstanding letters of credit. As at June 30, 2007, the Company’s current borrowing capacity under such calculation is $25.5 million after deduction for outstanding letters of credit of $11.4 million. The Credit Facility bears interest at the applicable prime rate per annum or LIBOR plus a margin as specified therein per annum and is collateralized by a first priority security interest in all of the current and future assets of the Company. The Credit Facility contains typical affirmative and negative covenants, including covenants that restrict the Company’s ability to: incur certain additional indebtedness; make certain loans, investments or guarantees; pay dividends; make certain asset sales; incur certain liens or other encumbrances; conduct certain transactions with affiliates and enter into certain corporate transactions. In addition, the Credit Facility agreement contains customary events of default, including upon an acquisition or a change of control that may have a material adverse effect on the Company or a guarantor. The Credit Facility also requires the Company to maintain, over a period of time, a minimum level of adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization including film asset amortization, stock and other non-cash compensation, write downs (recoveries), and asset impairment charges, and other non-cash uses of funds on a trailing four quarter basis calculated quarterly, of not less than $20.0 million. In the event that the Company’s available borrowing base falls below the amount borrowed against the Credit Facility, the excess above the available borrowing base becomes due upon demand by the lender. If the Credit Facility were to be terminated by either the Company or the lender, the Company would have the ability to pursue another source of financing pursuant to the terms of the Indenture.

The Company was in compliance with its adjusted EBITDA covenant as of June 30, 2007.

In March 2007, the Company delayed the filing of its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 beyond the filing deadline in order to restate financial statements for certain periods during fiscal years 2002 — 2006. On March 27, 2007, the Credit Facility lender waived the requirement for the Company to deliver audited consolidated financial statements within 120 days of the end of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, provided such statements and documents are delivered on or before June 30, 2007. On June 27, 2007, the Credit Facility lender agreed that an event of default would not deemed to have occurred unless the Company’s 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K filing did not occur by July 31, 2007 or upon the occurrence and continuance of an event of default under the Company’s Indenture dated as of December 4, 2003, and as thereafter amended and supplemented, governing its Senior Notes, which goes uncured within the applicable grace period. The Company cured such default under the Indenture by filing its 2006 Form 10-K and first quarter 2007 Form 10-Q on July 20, 2007.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

As at June 30, 2007, the Company’s principal sources of liquidity included cash and cash equivalents of $16.3 million, short-term investments of $2.2 million, the Credit Facility, trade accounts receivable of $26.4 million and anticipated collection from financing receivables due in the next 12 months of $12.1 million. As at June 30, 2007, the Company has not drawn down on the Credit Facility, and has letters of credit for $11.4 million secured by the Credit Facility arrangement.

Page 64

IMAX CORPORATION

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (cont’d)

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES (cont’d)

Cash and Cash Equivalents (cont’d)

The Company believes that cash flow from operations together with existing cash and borrowing available under the Credit Facility will be sufficient to fund the Company’s business operations, including its strategic initiatives relating to joint revenue sharing arrangements and to fund the development of its digitally-based projection system. The Company similarly believes it will be able to continue to meet customer commitments for at least the 12 month period commencing July 1, 2007. However, the Company’s operating cash flow will be adversely impacted if management’s projections of future signings and installations are not realized. The Company forecasts its short-term liquidity requirements on a quarterly and annual basis. Since the Company’s future cash flows are based on estimates and there may be factors that are outside of the Company’s control (see “Risk Factors” in Item 1A in the Company’s 2006 Form 10-K/A), there is no guarantee the Company will continue to be able to fund its operations through cash flows from operations. Under the terms of the Company’s typical theater system component lease agreement, the Company receives substantial cash payments before the Company completes the performance of its obligations. Similarly, the Company receives cash payments for some of its film productions in advance of related cash expenditures.

The Company’s net cash provided by (used in) operating activities is impacted by a number of factors, including the proceeds associated with new signings of theater system component lease and sale agreements in the year, costs associated with contributing systems under joint box-office sharing arrangements, the box-office performance of large-format films distributed by the Company and/or exhibited in the Company’s theaters, increases or decreases in the Company’s operating expenses, including research and development, and the level of cash collections received from its customers.

Cash used in operating activities amounted to $6.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007. Changes in other non-cash operating assets as compared to December 31, 2006 include a $0.6 million increase in commissions and other deferred selling expenses, an increase of $2.3 million in inventories, a decrease of $3.7 million in financing receivables, a $0.3 million increase in accounts receivable and a $0.4 million decrease in prepaid expenses, which mostly relates to prepaid film print costs that will be expensed over the period to be benefited. Changes in other non-cash operating liabilities as compared to December 31, 2006 include an increase in deferred revenue of $4.4 million, a decrease in accounts payable of $3.0 million and a decrease of $0.1 million in accrued liabilities. Included in accrued liabilities for the six months ended June 30, 2007 were $27.7 million in respect of accrued pension obligations which are mostly long-term in nature. In addition, $0.8 million was paid in the six months ended June 30, 2007 to extinguished the Company’s lease obligation under discontinued operations. Investments in film assets were $5.6 million at June 30, 2007.

Net cash used in investing activities amounted to $1.4 million in the six months ended June 30, 2007, which includes purchases of short-term investments of $4.3 million, proceeds from maturities of short-term investments of $4.3 million, purchases of $0.7 million in fixed assets, an increase in other assets of $0.4 million and an increase in other intangible assets of $0.3 million.

Cash used in financing activities in the six months ended June 30, 2007 amounted to $1.4 million due mainly to financing costs related to Senior Notes due 2010.

Capital expenditures, including the purchase of fixed assets and investments in film assets were $6.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007.

Cash used in operating activities amounted to $4.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006. Changes in other non-cash operating assets and liabilities include a decrease in accounts payable of $0.4 million, an increase in accrued liabilities of $0.7 million, an increase in deferred revenue of $3.3 million, an increase of $0.9 million in inventories and an increase in trade accounts receivable and financing receivables of $4.3 million. Cash provided by investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2006 amounted to $1.9 million, primarily consisting of $10.3 million invested in short-term investments, $10.3 million received from proceeds of short-term investments and $3.5 million from settlement of a note receivable from discontinued operations. Cash provided by financing activities amounted to $0.3 million due to the issuance of common shares through the exercise of stock options. Capital expenditures including the purchase of fixed assets net of sales proceeds and investments in film assets were $5.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006.

Letters of Credit and Other Commitments

As at June 30, 2007, the Company has letters of credit of $11.5 million outstanding, of which the entire balance has been secured under the Credit Facility. In addition, the Company has performance guarantees outstanding of $0.6 million that have been guaranteed through Export Development Canada.

Page 65

IMAX CORPORATION

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (cont’d)

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES (cont’d)

Senior Notes due 2010

As at June 30, 2007, the Company had outstanding $159.0 million aggregate principal of Registered Senior Notes and $1.0 million aggregate principal of Unregistered Senior Notes. The Registered Senior Notes and the Unregistered Senior Notes are referred to herein as the “Senior Notes”.

The terms of the Company’s Senior Notes impose certain restrictions on its operating and financing activities, including certain restrictions on the Company’s ability to: incur certain additional indebtedness; make certain distributions or certain other restricted payments; grant liens; create certain dividend and other payment restrictions affecting the Company’s subsidiaries; sell certain assets or merge with or into other companies; and enter into certain transactions with affiliates. The Company believes these restrictions will not have a material impact on its financial condition or results of operations.

In addition, the terms of the Company’s Senior Notes require that annual and quarterly financial statements are filed with the Trustee within 15 days of the required public company filing deadlines. If these financial reporting covenants are breached then this is considered an event of default under the terms of the Senior Notes and the Company has 30 days to cure this default, after which the Senior Notes become due and payable.

In March 2007, the Company delayed the filing of its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 beyond the required public company filing deadline due to the discovery of certain accounting errors, broadened its accounting review to include certain other accounting matters based on comments received by the Company from the SEC and OSC, and ultimately restated financial statements for certain periods during those years. The filing delay resulted in the Company being in default of a financial reporting covenant under the Indenture, governing the Company’s Senior Notes.

On April 16, 2007 the Company completed a consent solicitation, receiving consents from holders of approximately 60% aggregate principal amount of the Senior Notes (the “Consenting Holders”) to execute a ninth supplemental indenture (the “Supplemental Indenture”) to the Indenture with the Guarantors named therein and U.S. Bank National Association. The Supplemental Indenture waived any defaults existing at such time arising from a failure by the Company to comply with the reporting covenant and extended until May 31, 2007, or at the Company’s election until June 30, 2007 (the “Covenant Reversion Date”), the date by which the Company’s failure to comply with the reporting covenant shall constitute a default, or be the basis for an event of default under the Indenture. The Company paid consent fees of $1.0 million to the Consenting Holders. On May 30, 2007, the Company provided notice to the holders of the Senior Notes of its election to extend the Covenant Reversion Date to June 30, 2007. The Company paid additional consent fees of $0.5 million to the Consenting Holders. Because the Company did not file its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 and its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 by June 30, 2007, it was in default of the reporting covenant under the Indenture on July 1, 2007, and received notice of such default on July 2, 2007. The Company cured such default under the Indenture, by filing its 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K and the first quarter 2007 Form 10-Q on July 20, 2007, within the applicable grace period.

Pension and Postretirement Obligations

The Company has a defined benefit pension plan, the SERP, covering its two Co-CEOs. As at June 30, 2007, the Company had an unfunded and accrued projected benefit obligation of approximately $27.7 million (December 31, 2006 — $26.1 million) in respect of the SERP. At the time the Company established the SERP, it also took out life insurance policies on its two Co-CEOs with coverage amounts of $21.5 million in aggregate. The Company intends to use the proceeds of life insurance policies taken on its Co-CEOs to be applied towards the benefits due and payable under the SERP, although there can be no assurance that the Company will ultimately do so. As at June 30, 2007, the cash surrender value of the insurance policies is $4.6 million (December 31, 2005 — $4.3 million).

In July 2000, the Company agreed to maintain health benefits for its two Co-CEOs upon retirement. As at June 30, 2007, the Company had an unfunded benefit obligation of $0.4 million (December 31, 2006 — $0.4 million).

Page 66

IMAX CORPORATION

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (cont’d)

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES (cont’d)

Pension and Postretirement Obligations (cont’d)

On March 8, 2006, the Company and the Co-CEOs negotiated an amendment to the SERP covering its two Co-CEOs effective January 1, 2006 which reduced the related pension expense to the Company. Under the original terms of the SERP, once benefit payments begin, the benefit is indexed annually to the cost of living and further provides for 100% continuance for life to the surviving spouse. The Company, represented by the independent directors (as defined in Rule 4200(a) of the NASDAQ Marketplace Rules and Section 1.4 of Multilateral Instrument 52-110), retained Mercer Human Resources Consulting and outside legal counsel to advise them on certain analyses regarding the SERP. Under the terms of the SERP amendment, the cost of living adjustment and surviving spouse benefits previously owed to the Co-CEOs are each reduced by 50%, subject to a recoupment of a percentage of such benefits upon a change of control of the Company, and the net present value of the reduced benefit payments is accelerated and paid out upon a change of control of the Company. The benefits were 50% vested as of July 2000, the SERP initiation date. The vesting percentage increases on a straight-line basis from inception until age 55. The vesting percentage of a member whose employment terminates other than by voluntary retirement or upon change of control shall be 100%. The actuarial liability was remeasured as of March 8, 2006 to reflect the SERP changes adopted. Under the original terms of the SERP, benefits were determined as 75% of the member’s best average 60 consecutive months of earnings during the 120 months preceding retirement. On May 4, 2007, the Company amended the SERP to provide for the determination of benefits to be 75% of the member’s best average 60 consecutive months of earnings over the member’s employment history. The actuarial liability was remeasured to reflect this amendment. The amendment resulted in a $1.0 million increase to the pension liability and a corresponding $1.0 million change to other comprehensive income. As of June 30, 2007, one of the Co-CEO’s benefits was 100% vested and the other Co-CEO’s benefits were approximately 84% vested.

A Co-CEO whose employment terminates other than for cause prior to August 1, 2010 will receive SERP benefits in the form of monthly annuity payments until the earlier of a change of control or August 1, 2010 at which time the Co-CEO shall receive remaining benefits in the form of a lump sum payment. A Co-CEO whose employment terminates other than for cause on or after August 1, 2010 shall receive SERP benefits in the form of a lump sum payment.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

There are currently no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future material effect on the Company’s financial condition.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Factors about Market Risk

The Company is exposed to market risk from changes in foreign currency rates. The Company does not use financial instruments for trading or other speculative purposes.

A majority of the Company’s revenue is denominated in U.S. dollars while a significant portion of its costs and expenses is denominated in Canadian dollars. A portion of the Company’s net U.S. dollar flows is converted to Canadian dollars to fund Canadian dollar expenses through the spot market. In Japan, the Company has ongoing operating expenses related to its operations. Net Japanese yen cash flows are converted to U.S. dollars through the spot market. The Company also has cash receipts under leases denominated in Japanese yen, Euros and Canadian dollars. The Company plans to convert Japanese yen and Euros lease cash flows to U.S. dollars through the spot markets on a go-forward basis.

Page 67

IMAX CORPORATION

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the specified time periods and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Co-CEOs and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), to allow timely discussions regarding required disclosures. There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives.

The Company’s management, with the participation of its Co-CEOs and its CFO, have evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s “disclosure controls and procedures” (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e)) as of June 30, 2007. Based on that evaluation, the Co-CEOs and the CFO have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as at June 30, 2007. In making this evaluation, management considered, among other matters: the identification of certain material weaknesses in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, as discussed in the Company’s 2006 Form 10-K (and as described below); and the conclusion of the Co-CEOs and the CFO that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as at December 31, 2006 and March 31, 2007 were not effective, as discussed in the Company’s 2006 Form 10-K and first quarter 2007 Form 10-Q, respectively.

MATERIAL WEAKNESSES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the Company.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

A material weakness is a control deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim consolidated financial statements will not be prevented or detected.

As previously disclosed in Item 9A of the Company’s 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K, the Company’s Co-CEOs and CFO assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, and concluded that the following material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting existed as at December 31, 2006, all of which had not yet been remediated as at June 30, 2007:

Application of U.S. GAAP

Six of the Company’s material weaknesses relate to controls over the analysis and review of certain transactions to be able to correctly apply U.S. GAAP to record those transactions. The financial impact of these material weaknesses on the Company’s restated financial results was principally related to the analysis and review of transactions that were complex or nonstandard. These material weaknesses are:

	1.		The Company did not maintain adequate controls, including period-end controls, over the analysis and review of revenue recognition for sales and lease transactions in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Specifically, effective controls were not maintained to correctly assess the identification of deliverables and their aggregation into units of accounting and in certain cases the point when certain units of accounting were substantially complete to allow for revenue recognition on a theater system.

			In addition, the Company did not have effective controls over other aspects of such transactions including identifying the fair values of certain future deliverables, identifying certain clauses in arrangements that impact revenue recognition, accounting for warranty costs, the appropriate accounting for certain settlement agreements and the recognition of finance income on impaired receivables.

Page 68

IMAX CORPORATION

Item 4. Controls and Procedures (cont’d)

MATERIAL WEAKNESSES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING (cont’d)

Application of U.S. GAAP (cont’d)

	2.		The Company did not maintain effective controls, including period-end controls, over accounting for film transactions in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Specifically, effective controls were not maintained related to the classification and accurate recording of marketing and advertising costs of co-produced film productions, production fees on co-produced films and the application of the individual-film forecast computation method to film assets, participation liabilities and deferred production fees.

	3.		The Company did not maintain effective controls, including period-end controls, over the accounting for contract origination costs in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Specifically, effective controls were not maintained related to the classification of fees paid to a professional services firm.

	4.		The Company did not maintain adequate controls over the complete and accurate recording of postretirement benefits other than pensions in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Specifically, effective controls were not maintained over the complete identification of all relevant contractual provisions within its executive employment contracts.

	5.		The Company did not maintain effective controls over the intraperiod allocation of the provision for income taxes in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Specifically, effective controls were not in place such that the tax provisions were appropriately allocated to continuing operations, discontinued operations, and accumulated other comprehensive income.

	6.		The Company did not maintain adequate controls, including period-end controls, over the complete and accurate recording of transactions related to real estate lease arrangements for owned and operated theaters or corporate offices in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Specifically, effective controls were not maintained over the complete identification of all relevant contractual provisions including lease inducements, construction allowances, rent holidays, escalation clauses and lease commencement dates. In addition, adequate controls were not maintained over the accurate recording of rent abatements received in subsequent periods.

Cross-departmental Communication

Two of the Company’s material weaknesses relate to controls over the lines of communication between different departments. These material weaknesses are:

	7.		The Company did not maintain adequate controls over the lines of communication between operational departments and the Finance Department related to revenue recognition for sales and lease transactions. Specifically, effective controls were not maintained to raise on a timely basis certain issues relating to observations of the installation process, any remaining installation or operating obligations, and concessions on contractual terms that may impact the accuracy and timing of revenue recognition.

	8.		The Company did not maintain adequate controls over the timely communication between departments of information relating to developing issues that may impact the Company’s financial reporting. Specifically, effective controls were not maintained over the status of a review of cap limits under the Company’s Stock Option Plan that affected the recording and related disclosure of stock-based compensation benefits.

In addition to the restatements and audit adjustments discussed in the Company’s 2006 Form 10-K/A, each of these control deficiencies above could result in a misstatement of certain account balances or disclosures that would result in a material misstatement to the annual or interim financial statements that would not be prevented or detected. Management determined that each of these control deficiencies set forth above constitutes a material weakness at June 30, 2007.

Page 69

IMAX CORPORATION

Item 4. Controls and Procedures (cont’d)

REMEDIATION PLAN

The Company’s management, including the Co-CEOs and CFO, are committed to remediating its material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting by enhancing existing controls and introducing new controls in all necessary areas. The smooth functioning of the Company’s finance area is of the highest priority for the Company’s management. Remediation activities will include the following specifics:

The Company will strengthen U.S. GAAP awareness throughout all levels of the Finance Department to help prevent material misstatements. The objective of strengthening U.S. GAAP awareness is to enable personnel throughout all levels of the Finance Department to recognize complex or atypical situations in the day-to-day operations which may require further analysis. Management is currently considering various ways of meeting this objective effectively.

The Company will enhance cross-functional communications to assist in preventing material misstatements. The objective of enhancing cross-functional communications is to provide an effective forum through which all relevant information pertaining to transactions could be sought by, and communicated to, the Finance Department for consideration of accounting implications. Management is currently considering various ways of meeting this objective most effectively and efficiently.

The Company has revised its revenue recognition policy in the second quarter of 2007. The Company will enhance its controls in this area by documenting a detailed analysis for all sales and lease transactions to help ensure that the timing of revenue recognition is appropriate, and that all contractual provisions have been sufficiently considered in determining the timing and amounts of revenues to be recognized. As well, to assist in preventing material misstatements, the Company will enhance its period-end reviews of sales and lease transactions to specifically consider whether the accounting for these transactions is in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

The Company will enhance its controls in accounting for film transactions. To assist in preventing material misstatements, the Company will enhance its review of new film transactions for complexities that may impact the accounting for the transaction and treatment within the film’s ultimate model. As well, to assist in preventing material misstatements, the Company will enhance its period-end reviews of film accounting to specifically consider whether revenues and costs are being treated in accordance with SOP 00-2.

The Company will enhance its controls in accounting for costs related to inventory. To assist in preventing material misstatements, the Company will develop guidelines regarding the nature of costs that could be capitalized to inventory with appropriate references to U.S. GAAP, which would be distributed to personnel involved with inventory costs. As well, to assist in preventing material misstatements, the Company will enhance its period-end reviews of the inventory balances to specifically consider whether the nature of the costs that comprise inventory balances are in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

The Company will enhance its controls to capture all postretirement benefits other than pensions included within executive employment contracts. Management is currently considering various ways of meeting this objective efficiently and effectively.

The Company will enhance its controls in accounting for intraperiod allocations of income taxes. Management is currently considering various ways of meeting this objective effectively.

The Company will enhance its controls in reviewing its real estate lease arrangements to determine the correct accounting treatment. Management is currently considering various ways of meeting this objective effectively.

The Company’s management, including the Co-CEOs and CFO, is committed to implementing its remediation plan as soon as practicable.

CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

Except as described above, there were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2007 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Page 70

IMAX CORPORATION

PART II OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

(a)		In March 2005, the Company, together with Three-Dimensional Media Group, Ltd. (“3DMG”), filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, Western Division, against In-Three, Inc. (“In-Three”) alleging patent infringement. On March 10, 2006, the Company and In-Three entered into a settlement agreement settling the dispute between the Company and In-Three. On June 12, 2006, the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, Western Division, entered a stay in the proceedings against In-Three pending the arbitration of disputes between the Company and 3DMG. Arbitration was initiated by the Company against 3DMG on May 15, 2006 before the International Centre for Dispute Resolution in New York, alleging breaches of the license and consulting agreements between the Company and 3DMG. On June 15, 2006, 3DMG filed an answer denying any breaches and asserting counterclaims that the Company breached the parties’ license agreement. On June 21, 2007, the Arbitration Panel unanimously denied 3DMG’s Motion for Summary Judgment filed on April 11, 2007 concerning the Company’s claims and 3DMG’s counterclaims. On October 5, 2007, 3DMG amended its counterclaims and added counterclaims from UNIPAT.ORG relating to fees allegedly owed to UNIPAT.ORG by IMAX. An evidentiary hearing on liability issues has been set for January 2008 with further proceedings on damages issues to be scheduled if and when necessary. The Company will continue to pursue its claims vigorously and believes that all allegations made by 3DMG are without merit. The Company further believes that the amount of loss, if any, suffered in connection with the counterclaims would not have a material impact on the financial position or operations of the Company, although no assurance can be given with respect to the ultimate outcome of the arbitration.

(b)		In January 2004, the Company and IMAX Theater Services Ltd., a subsidiary of the Company, commenced an arbitration seeking damages of approximately $3.7 million before the International Court of Arbitration of the International Chambers of Commerce (the “ICC”) with respect to the breach by Electronic Media Limited (“EML”) of its December 2000 agreement with the Company. In June 2004, the Company commenced a related arbitration before the ICC against EML’s affiliate, E-CITI Entertainment (I) PVT Limited (“E-Citi”), seeking $17.8 million in damages as a result of E-Citi’s breach of a September 2000 lease agreement. The damages sought against E-Citi included the original claim sought against EML. An arbitration hearing took place in November 2005 against E-Citi, which included all claims by the Company. On February 1, 2006, the ICC issued an award on liability finding unanimously in the Company’s favor on all claims. Further hearings took place in July 2006 and December 2006. On August 24, 2007, the ICC issued an award unanimously in favor of the Company in the amount of $9.4 million, consisting of past and future rents owed to the Company under its lease agreements, plus interest and costs. In the award, the ICC upheld the validity and enforceability of the Company’s theater system contract. The Company has now submitted its application to the arbitration panel for interest and costs and is awaiting the Panel’s decision on that issue.

(c)		In June 2004, Robots of Mars, Inc. (“Robots”) initiated an arbitration proceeding against the Company in California with the American Arbitration Association pursuant to an arbitration provision in a 1994 film production agreement between Robots’ predecessor-in-interest and a subsidiary of the Company, asserting claims for breach of contract, fraud, breach of fiduciary duty and intentional interference with contract. Robots is seeking an accounting of the Company’s revenues and an award of all sums alleged to be due to Robots under the production agreement, as well as punitive damages. The Company intends to vigorously defend the arbitration proceeding and believes the amount of the loss, if any, that may be suffered in connection with this proceeding will not have a material impact on the financial position or results of operations of the Company, although no assurance can be given with respect to the ultimate outcome of such arbitration

Page 71

IMAX CORPORATION

PART II OTHER INFORMATION (cont’d)

Item 1. Legal Proceedings (cont’d)

(d)		The Company and certain of its officers and directors were named as defendants in eight purported class action lawsuits filed between August 11, 2006 and September 18, 2006, alleging violations of U.S. federal securities laws. These eight actions were filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. On January 18, 2007, the Court consolidated all eight class action lawsuits and appointed Westchester Capital Management, Inc. as the lead plaintiff and Abbey Spanier Rodd Abrams & Paradis LLP as lead plaintiff’s counsel. On October 2, 2007, plaintiffs filed a consolidated amended class action complaint. The amended complaint, brought on behalf of shareholders who purchased the Company’s common stock between February 27, 2003 through July 30, 2007, alleges primarily that the defendants engaged in securities fraud by disseminating materially false and misleading statements during the class period regarding the Company’s revenue recognition of theater system installations, and failing to disclose material information concerning the Company’s revenue recognition practices. The amended complaint also adds PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the Company’s auditors, as a defendant. The lawsuit seeks unspecified compensatory damages, costs, and expenses. The lawsuit is at a very early stage and as a result the Company is not able to estimate a potential loss exposure. The Company believes the allegations made against it in the amended complaint are meritless and will vigorously defend the matter, although no assurances can be given with respect to the outcome of such proceedings. The Company’s directors and officers insurance policy provides for reimbursement for costs and expenses incurred in connection with this lawsuit as well as potential damages awarded, if any, subject to certain policy limits and deductibles. The deadline for defendants to respond to the amended complaint is currently December 3, 2007.

(e)		A class action lawsuit was filed on September 20, 2006 in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice against the Company and certain of its officers and directors, alleging violations of Canadian securities laws. This lawsuit was brought on behalf of shareholders who acquired the Company’s securities between February 17, 2006 and August 9, 2006. The lawsuit is in a very early stage and seeks unspecified compensatory and punitive damages, as well as costs and expenses. As a result, the Company is unable to estimate a potential loss exposure. The Company believes the allegations made against it in the statement of claim are meritless and will vigorously defend the matter, although no assurance can be given with respect to the ultimate outcome of such proceedings. The Company’s directors and officers insurance policy provides for reimbursement for costs and expenses incurred in connection with this lawsuit as well as potential damages awarded, if any, subject to certain policy limits and deductibles.

(f)		On September 7, 2007, Catalyst Fund Limited Partnership II, a holder of the Company’s Senior Notes (“Catalyst”), commenced an application against the Company in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice for a declaration of oppression pursuant to s. 229 and 241 of the Canada Business Corporations Act (“CBCA”) and for a declaration that the Company is in default of the Indenture governing its Senior Notes. The allegations of oppression are substantially the same as allegations Catalyst made in a May 10, 2007 complaint filed against the Company in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, and subsequently withdrawn on October 12, 2007, wherein Catalyst challenged the validity of the consent solicitation through which the Company requested and obtained a waiver of any and all defaults arising from a failure to comply with the reporting covenant under the Indenture and alleged common law fraud. Catalyst has also requested the appointment of an inspector and an order that an investigation be carried out pursuant to s. 229 of the CBCA. In addition, between March 2007 and October 2007, Catalyst has sent the Company eight purported notices of default or acceleration under the Indenture. It is the Company’s position that no default or event of default (as those terms are defined in the Indenture) has occurred or is continuing under the Indenture and, accordingly, that Catalyst’s purported acceleration notice is of no force or effect. The Company is in the process of responding to the Ontario application and a hearing is scheduled to take place on January 15 and 16, 2008. The litigation is at a preliminary stage and as a result, the Company is not able to estimate a potential loss exposure. The Company believes this application is entirely without merit and plans to contest it vigorously and seek costs from Catalyst, although no assurances can be given with respect to the outcome of the proceedings.

(g)		On June 19, 2007, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice granted the Company’s application to call its Annual General Meeting between June 30, 2007 and September 30, 2007.

(h)		In addition to the matters described above, the Company is currently involved in other legal proceedings which, in the opinion of the Company’s management, will not materially affect the Company’s financial position or future operating results, although no assurance can be given with respect to the ultimate outcome of any such proceedings.

Page 72

IMAX CORPORATION

Item 1A. Risk Factors

There have been no material changes to the factors disclosed in Item 1A. Risk Factors in the Company’s Amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2006.

Item 6. Exhibits


Exhibit No.		Description

31.1		Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes — Oxley Act of 2002, dated November 5, 2007, by Bradley J. Wechsler.

31.2		Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes — Oxley Act of 2002, dated November 5, 2007, by Richard L. Gelfond.

31.3		Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes — Oxley Act of 2002, dated November 5, 2007, by Joseph Sparacio.

32.1		Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes — Oxley Act of 2002, dated November 5, 2007, by Bradley J. Wechsler.

32.2		Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes — Oxley Act of 2002, dated November 5, 2007, by Richard L. Gelfond.

32.3		Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes — Oxley Act of 2002, dated November 5, 2007, by Joseph Sparacio.

Page 73

IMAX CORPORATION

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


	IMAX CORPORATION
Date: November 5, 2007	By:	/s/ Joseph Sparacio
		Joseph Sparacio
		Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)


Date: November 5, 2007	By:	/s/ Jeffrey Vance
		Jeffrey Vance
		Co-Controller (Principal Accounting Officer)


Date: November 5, 2007	By:	/s/ Vigna Vivekanand
		Vigna Vivekanand
		Co-Controller (Principal Accounting Officer)

Page 74