Registrant's telephone number, including area code:  630-218-8000

N/A
(Former name, former address and former fiscal
year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes  Q No  q

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer.  See definition of "accelerated filer and large accelerated filer" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.  (Check One):  Large accelerated filer Q Accelerated filer q Non-accelerated filer q

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes  q No Q

As of August 7, 2006, there were 67,710,749 shares of common stock outstanding.

INLAND REAL ESTATE CORPORATION
(a Maryland corporation)


TABLE OF CONTENTS

1

Part I - Financial Information

Item 1.  Financial Statements

INLAND REAL ESTATE CORPORATION
Consolidated Balance Sheets
June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005
(In thousands except per share data)

Assets

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

2

INLAND REAL ESTATE CORPORATION
Consolidated Balance Sheets (continued)
June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005
(In thousands except per share data)

Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

3

INLAND REAL ESTATE CORPORATION
Consolidated Statements of Operations
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 (unaudited)
(In thousands except per share data)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

4

INLAND REAL ESTATE CORPORATION
Consolidated Statements of Operations
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 (unaudited)
(In thousands except per share data)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

5

INLAND REAL ESTATE CORPORATION
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity
For the six months ended June 30, 2006
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

6

INLAND REAL ESTATE CORPORATION
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 (unaudited)
(In thousands)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

7

INLAND REAL ESTATE CORPORATION
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 (unaudited)
(In thousands)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

8

INLAND REAL ESTATE CORPORATION
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 (unaudited)
(In thousands)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

9

INLAND REAL ESTATE CORPORATION
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2006 (unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share data and square footage amounts)

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("U.S. GAAP") for interim financial information and with instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X.  Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements.  Readers of this Quarterly Report should refer to the audited financial statements of Inland Real Estate Corporation (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2005, which are included in the Company's 2005 Annual Report, as certain footnote disclosures contained in such audited financial statements have been omitted from this Report on Form 10-Q.  In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) necessary for a fair presentation have been included in this Quarterly Report.

(1) Organization and Basis of Accounting

The Company was formed on May 12, 1994.  The Company, collectively with its consolidated entities, is a publicly held real estate investment trust ("REIT") that owns, operates and develops (directly or through its unconsolidated entities) retail shopping centers located primarily within an approximate 400-mile radius of its headquarters in Oak Brook, Illinois.

The Company has qualified as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code") for federal income tax purposes commencing with the tax year ending December 31, 1995.  So long as the Company qualifies for treatment as a REIT, it generally will not be subject to federal income tax to the extent it meets the requirements of the tests imposed by the Code.  If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, the Company will be subject to federal income tax on its taxable income at regular corporate tax rates.  Even if the Company qualifies for taxation as a REIT, the Company may be subject to certain state and local taxes on its income and property and federal income and excise taxes on its undistributed income.

Additionally, in connection with the Tax Relief Extension Act of 1999, which became effective January 1, 2001, the Company is permitted to participate in certain activities that were previously prohibited in order to maintain its qualification as a REIT, so long as these activities are conducted in entities that elect to be treated as taxable REIT subsidiaries ("TRS") under the Code, subject to certain limitations.  As such, the TRS is subject to federal and state income taxes on the income from these activities.

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Certain reclassifications were made to the 2005 financial statements to conform to the 2006 presentation.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements of the Company include the accounts of its wholly-owned subsidiaries and consolidated joint ventures.  These entities are consolidated because the Company is either the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity or has substantial influence over or controls the entity.  The primary beneficiary is the party that absorbs a majority of the entity's expected residual returns and losses.  The third parties' interests in these consolidated entities are reflected as minority interest in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.  All inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The Company considers all demand deposits, money market accounts and investments in certificates of deposit and repurchase agreements purchased with a maturity of three months or less, at the date of purchase, to be cash equivalents.  The Company maintains its cash and cash equivalents at financial institutions.  The combined account balances at one or more institutions periodically exceed the Federal Depository Insurance Corporation ("FDIC") insurance coverage and, as a result, there is a concentration of credit risk related to amounts on deposit in excess of FDIC insurance coverage.  The Company believes that the risk is not significant, as the Company does not anticipate the financial institutions' non-performance.

10

INLAND REAL ESTATE CORPORATION
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2006 (unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share data and square footage amounts)

Depreciation expense is computed using the straight-line method.  Buildings and improvements are depreciated based upon estimated useful lives of 30 years for buildings and improvements and 15 years for site improvements.  The Company accounts for tenant allowances as tenant improvements.  Tenant improvements are depreciated over the life of the related lease.

Acquired above and below market leases are amortized on a straight-line basis over the life of the related leases as an adjustment to rental income.  Acquired in-place leases and customer relationship values are amortized over the average lease term as a component of amortization expense.

The Company allocates the purchase price of each acquired investment property between land, building and improvements, other intangibles (including acquired above market leases, acquired below market leases, customer relationships and acquired in-place leases) and any assumed financing that is determined to be above or below market terms.  The Company uses the information contained in the third party appraisals as the primary basis for allocating the purchase price between land and site improvements.  The aggregate value of other intangibles is measured based on the difference between the purchase price and the property valued as if vacant.

The Company capitalizes interest costs related to construction in progress and considers both interest paid on debt obtained to fund the project and the interest cost incurred during this period that could have been avoided.  The Company has recorded approximately $93 of capitalized interest related to its joint venture with Tucker Development Corporation for the six months ended June 30, 2006.

On a quarterly basis, in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, the Company reviews impairment indicators and if necessary conducts an impairment analysis to ensure that the carrying value of each property does not exceed its estimated fair value.  The Company evaluates its investment properties to assess whether any impairment indicators are present, including recurring operating losses and significant adverse changes in legal factors or business climate.  If an investment property is considered impaired, a loss is recorded to reduce the carrying value of the property to its estimated fair value.  No such losses have been required or recorded in the accompanying financial statements as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005.

Leasing fees are amortized on a straight-line basis over the life of the related lease.  Loan fees are amortized on a straight-line basis over the life of the related loan.

Offering costs are offset against the stockholders' equity accounts.  Offering costs consist principally of printing, selling and registration costs.

Tenants required to pay a security deposit under their lease with the Company have paid either in cash or by posting letters of credit.  The letters of credit are not recorded in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.  As of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, the Company held letters of credit for tenant security deposits totaling approximately $429 for each period.

Rental income is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of each lease.  The difference between rental income earned on a straight-line basis and the cash rent due under provisions of the lease agreements is recorded as deferred rent receivable and is included as a component of accounts and rents receivable in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

The Company accrues lease termination income if there is a signed termination agreement, all of the conditions of the agreement have been met and the tenant is no longer occupying the property.

11

INLAND REAL ESTATE CORPORATION
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2006 (unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share data and square footage amounts)

On December 2, 1999, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin 101 "Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements."  The staff determined that a lessor should defer recognition of contingent rental income, such as percentage/excess rent until the specified target that triggers the contingent rental income is achieved.  The Company has recorded percentage rental revenue in accordance with the SAB for all periods presented.

As of June 30, 2006 and 2005, the Company had no material derivative instruments.  The Company may enter into derivative financial instrument transactions in order to mitigate its interest rate risk on a related financial instrument.  The Company may designate these derivative financial instruments as hedges and apply hedge accounting, as the instrument to be hedged will expose the Company to interest rate risk, and the derivative financial instrument will reduce that exposure.  Gains or losses related to the derivative financial instrument would be deferred and amortized over the terms of the hedged instruments.  If a derivative terminates or is sold, the gain or loss is recognized.  The Company will generally enter into derivative transactions that satisfy the aforementioned criteria only.

Recent Accounting Principles

In June 2005, the FASB ratified the EITF's consensus on Issue No. 04-5 "Determining Whether a General Partner or the General Partners as a Group, Controls a Limited Partnership or Similar Entity When the Limited Partners Have Certain Rights."  This consensus establishes the presumption that general partners in a limited partnership control that limited partnership regardless of the extent of the general partners' ownership interest in the limited partnership.  The consensus further establishes that the rights of the limited partners can overcome the presumption of control by the general partners, if the limited partners have either (a) the substantive ability to dissolve (liquidate) the limited partnership or otherwise remove the general partners without cause or (b) substantive participating rights.  Whether the presumption of control is overcome is a matter of judgement based on the facts and circumstances, for which the consensus provides additional guidance.  This consensus is currently applicable to the Company for new or modified partnerships, and is applicable to existing partnerships in 2006.  This consensus applies to limited partnerships or similar entities, such as limited liability companies that have governing provisions that are the functional equivalent of a limited partnership.  Adoption did not have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

(2)     Investment Securities

The Company classifies its investment in securities in one of three categories: trading; available-for-sale; or held-to-maturity.  Trading securities are bought and held principally for the purpose of selling them in the near term.  Held-to-maturity securities are those securities in which the Company has the ability and intent to hold the security until maturity.  All securities not included in trading or held-to-maturity are classified as available-for-sale.

Investment in securities at June 30, 2006 and 2005 are classified as available-for-sale securities.  Available-for sale securities are recorded at fair value.  Unrealized holding gains and losses on available-for-sale securities are excluded from earnings and reported as a separate component of other comprehensive income until realized.  Realized gains and losses from the sale of available-for-sale securities are calculated using the first in first out ("FIFO") method of accounting.  Dividend income is recognized when received.  The Company acquires stock on margin.  The margin loan is subject to its terms and conditions.  At June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 the loan balances were $8,690 and $9,242, respectively, and are included in other liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

A decline in the market value of any available-for-sale security below cost that is deemed to be other than temporary results in a reduction in the carrying amount to fair value.  The impairment is charged to earnings and a new cost basis for the security is established.  To determine whether an impairment is other than temporary, the Company considers whether it has the ability and intent to hold the investment until a market price recovery and considers whether evidence indicating the cost of the investment is recoverable outweighs evidence to the contrary.  Evidence considered in this assessment includes the reasons for the impairment, the severity and duration of the impairment, changes in value subsequent to the end of the period and forecasted performance of the investee.

12

INLAND REAL ESTATE CORPORATION
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2006 (unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share data and square footage amounts)

Sales of investment securities available-for-sale during the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 resulted in gains on sale of $40 and $26, respectively.  These gains are included in other income in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

Gross unrealized losses on investment securities and the fair value of the related securities, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at June 30, 2006 were as follows:

(3)     Unconsolidated Joint Ventures

Unconsolidated joint ventures are those where the Company is not the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity or does not have substantial influence over or control the entity.  The Company accounts for its interest in these ventures using the equity method of accounting.  Pertinent information related to these ventures is summarized in the following table.

The Company's proportionate share of the earnings or losses related to these ventures is reflected as equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.  Additionally, the Company earns fees for providing property management, leasing and acquisition activities to these ventures.  The Company recognizes only its share of these fees in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

The operations of properties contributed to the joint ventures by the Company are not recorded as discontinued operations because of the Company's continuing involvement with these shopping centers.  Differences between the Company's investment in the joint ventures and the amount of the underlying equity in net assets of the joint ventures are due to basis differences resulting from the Company's equity investment recorded at its historical basis versus the fair value of certain of the Company's contributions to the joint venture.  Such differences are amortized over depreciable lives of the joint venture's property assets.  During the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, the Company recorded $683 and $714, respectively, of amortization of this basis difference.

13

INLAND REAL ESTATE CORPORATION
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2006 (unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share data and square footage amounts)

Summarized financial information for the unconsolidated joint ventures is as follows:

(4)     Mortgages Receivable

On June 30, 2005, the Company entered into a buy-out and restructuring agreement, which amended the previous LLC agreement with a wholly owned subsidiary of Tri-Land Properties, Inc., dated February 1, 2001.  The Company will continue to be a lender to the wholly owned subsidiary of Tri-Land Properties, Inc. for this redevelopment project.  The Company agreed to lend Tri-Land Properties, Inc. up to $21,500.  Draws on the loan bear interest at a rate of 8.5% per annum, with 5.5% to be paid currently and the remaining 3% to be accrued, with no additional interest, and paid upon maturity.  The loan matures on June 30, 2008.  As of June 30, 2006, the balance of this mortgage receivable was $11,865.  Tri-Land Properties, Inc. has guaranteed $1,000 of this mortgage receivable.  The Company recorded a deferred gain of $3,193 on the sale of its equity investment related to the previous joint venture agreement, as it did not qualify for gain recognition due to the lack of initial investment and continuing involvement.  Such amounts are included in other liabilities on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

In conjunction with the sale of Sears Plaza in Montgomery, Illinois, the Company gave a purchase money mortgage to the buyer in the amount of $1,000.  The buyer is required to pay interest only on a monthly basis at a rate of 9.0% per annum.  The balance of the mortgage, and any unpaid interest, are to be paid on May 1, 2007.

14

INLAND REAL ESTATE CORPORATION
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2006 (unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share data and square footage amounts)

(5)     Transactions with Related Parties

During the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, the Company purchased various administrative services, such as payroll preparation and management, data processing, insurance consultation and placement, property tax reduction services and mail processing from, or through, affiliates of The Inland Group, Inc.  The Company pays for these services on an hourly basis.  The hourly rate is based on the salary of the individual rendering the services, plus a pro rata allocation of overhead including, but not limited to, employee benefits, rent, materials, fees, taxes and operating expenses incurred by each entity in operating their respective businesses.  Computer services were purchased at a contract rate of $50 per hour.  The Company continues to purchase these services from The Inland Group, Inc. and its affiliates and for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, these expenses, totaling $383 and $385, respectively, are included in general and administrative expenses and property operating expenses.  Additionally, the Company leases its corporate office space from an affiliate of The Inland Group, Inc.  Payments under this lease for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 were $170 and $124, respectively, and are also included in general and administrative expenses.  The Inland Group, Inc., through affiliates, owns approximately 9.5% of the Company's outstanding common stock.  For accounting purposes however, the Company is not directly affiliated with The Inland Group, Inc. or its affiliates.

On June 30, 2005, the Company entered into a buy-out and restructuring agreement, which amended the previous LLC agreement with a wholly owned subsidiary of Tri-Land Properties, Inc., dated February 1, 2001.  The Company agreed to lend Tri-Land Properties, Inc. up to $21,500 for the development of the Century Consumer Mall in Merrillville, Indiana.  Richard Dube, the brother-in-law of Mr. Daniel Goodwin, the Company's Chairman of the Board, is the president and a principal owner of Tri-Land.  Reference is made to Note 5 for more information on the Company's mortgage receivable with Tri-Land.

On August 12, 2003, the Company entered into an agreement with Inland Investment Advisors, Inc., an affiliate of The Inland Group, Inc. to manage its investment in securities.  The Company pays a fee of up to one percent per annum on the net asset value under management.  The Company paid approximately $92 and $34 for these services during the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

In May 2005, the Company acquired a 1% interest in The Inland Real Estate Group of Companies, Inc. for a purchase price of $1.  The Inland Real Estate Group of Companies, Inc. provides assistance in the marketing of the Company's investment properties and provides representation at various trade shows and conventions.

In June 2006, the Company entered into a joint venture agreement with North American Real Estate, Inc ("NARE") to acquire and develop approximately 31 acres of vacant land.  One of our directors, Joel Simmons, is a minority partner in the entity that NARE formed to be the partner in this venture.  Mr. Simmons will receive his pro rata share of NARE's earnings from this venture and is not entitled to preferred distributions.

(6)     Discontinued Operations

During the six months ended June 30, 2006 and the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company sold a total of six investment properties.  Additionally, the Company has sold portions of certain investment properties.  For federal and state income tax purposes, certain of the Company's sales qualified as part of tax deferred exchanges and, as a result, the tax gains are deferred until the replacement properties are disposed of in subsequent taxable transactions.  The proceeds from these sales were deposited with a qualified tax deferred exchange agent with the intent of using these proceeds for future acquisitions.  The following table summarizes the properties sold, date of sale, approximate sales proceeds, net of closing costs, gain on sale and whether the sale qualified as part of a tax deferred exchange

15

INLAND REAL ESTATE CORPORATION
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2006 (unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share data and square footage amounts)

If the Company determines that an investment property meets the criteria to be classified as held for sale, it suspends depreciation on the assets held for sale, including depreciation for tenant improvements and additions, as well as on the amortization of acquired in-place leases and customer relationship values.  The assets and liabilities associated with those assets would be classified separately on the consolidated balance sheets for the most recent reporting period.  As of June 30, 2006, there were no properties classified as held for sale.

On the accompanying consolidated balance sheets at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, the Company has recorded $54 and $36, respectively of assets related to discontinued operations and $19 and $69, respectively of liabilities related to discontinued operations.  These amounts are reflected as a component of other assets and other liabilities on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.  Additionally, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, the Company has recorded income from discontinued operations of $2,357 and $2,134, respectively, including gains on sale of $2,329 and $2,134.  For the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 , the Company recorded income from discontinued operations of $189 and $346, respectively, including gains on sale of $219 for each period.

(7)     Operating Leases

Minimum lease payments under operating leases to be received in the future, excluding rental income under master lease agreements and assuming no expiring leases are renewed, are as follows:

Remaining lease terms range from one to fifty years.  Pursuant to the lease agreements, tenants of the property are required to reimburse the Company for some or all of the particular tenant's pro rata share of the real estate taxes and operating expenses of the property.  Such amounts are not included in the future minimum lease payments above, but are included in tenant recoveries on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

Certain tenant leases contain provisions providing for "stepped" rent increases.  U.S. GAAP requires the Company to record rental income for the period of occupancy using the effective monthly rent, which is the average monthly rent for the entire period of occupancy during the term of the lease.  The accompanying consolidated financial statements include an increase of $242 and a decrease of $294 for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, of rental income for the period of occupancy for which stepped rent increases apply and $19,563 and $19,322 in related accounts and rents receivable as of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively.  The Company anticipates collecting these amounts over the terms of the leases as scheduled rent payments are made.

16

INLAND REAL ESTATE CORPORATION
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2006 (unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share data and square footage amounts)

(8)     Mortgages Payable

The Company's mortgages payable are secured by certain of its investment properties and consist of the following at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005:

17

INLAND REAL ESTATE CORPORATION
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2006 (unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share data and square footage amounts)

The following table presents the principal amount of the debt maturing each year, including monthly annual amortization of principal, through December 31, 2010 and thereafter, based on debt outstanding at June 30, 2006:

(a)

Included in the debt maturing during 2008 is our line of credit with KeyBank N.A.  

(9)     Line of Credit

On June 28, 2002, the Company entered into a $100,000 unsecured line of credit arrangement with KeyBank N.A. for a period of three years.  The funds from this line of credit are used to purchase additional investment properties.  

On April 22, 2005, the Company completed a second amendment to this line of credit.  The aggregate commitment of the Company's line is $400,000 and matures on April 22, 2008.  The Company pays interest only on draws under the line at the rate equal to 120 – 160 basis points over LIBOR.  The Company is also required to pay, on a quarterly basis, an amount less than 1% per annum on the average daily funds remaining under this line.  In conjunction with this amendment, the Company paid approximately $541 in fees and costs.  The outstanding balance on the line of credit was $115,000 as of June 30, 2006.

The line of credit requires compliance with certain covenants, such as debt service ratios, minimum net worth requirements, distribution limitations and investment restrictions.  As of June 30, 2006, the Company was in compliance with these covenants.

(10)     Earnings per Share

Basic earnings per share ("EPS") is computed by dividing net income by the basic weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period (the "common shares").  Diluted EPS is computed by dividing net income by the common shares plus shares issuable upon exercise of existing options or other contracts.  

18

INLAND REAL ESTATE CORPORATION
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2006 (unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share data and square footage amounts)

As of June 30, 2006, 56 shares of common stock issued pursuant to employment agreements were outstanding, of which 11 have vested.  Additionally, the Company issued 26 shares pursuant to employment incentives of which 3 have vested.  The unvested shares are excluded from the computation of basic EPS but reflected in diluted EPS by application of the treasury stock method.  As of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively, options to purchase 34 and 29 shares of common stock at exercise prices ranging from $9.05 to $10.45 per share were outstanding, respectively.  These options were not included in the computation of basic or diluted EPS as the effect would be immaterial.

The basic weighted average number of common shares outstanding were 67,527 and 67,133 for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.  The diluted weighted average number of common shares outstanding were 67,595 and 67,182 for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

(11)     Deferred Stock Compensation

The Company has agreed to issue common stock to certain officers of the Company pursuant to employment agreements entered into with these officers.

As of June 30, 2006, an aggregate of 56 shares of the Company's common stock had been issued pursuant to agreements with certain of the Company's employees.  During the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, the Company issued 19 and 32 additional shares at a value of $15.18 and $12.93 per share, respectively, which was the average of the high and low selling price on the date of issue, as reported by the New York Stock Exchange.  Prior to 2004, the Company issued 5 shares at a value of $11 per share.  These 56 shares had an aggregate value of $762.  Additionally, during the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, the Company issued 26 shares pursuant to employment incentives for certain Company officers.  These shares were also issued at values of $15.18 and $12.93 per share, respectively, which was the average of the high and low selling price on the date of issue, as reported by the New York Stock Exchange.  Each officer vests an equal portion of shares over a five-year vesting period, beginning one year from the date of issuance of the award.  Compensation cost of $118 and $72 were recorded in connection with the issuance of these shares for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005.

The officers also may receive additional restricted shares of the Company's common stock, which also are subject to a five-year vesting period.  The number of these shares is to be determined based upon the future performance of the Company.  No additional shares were issued during the six months ended June 30, 2006.

(12)     Segment Reporting

The Company owns and acquires Neighborhood Retail Centers and Community Centers located primarily within an approximate 400-mile radius of its headquarters in Oak Brook, Illinois, as well as single-user properties located throughout the United States.  The Company currently owns investment properties located in the States of Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, Ohio, Tennessee and Wisconsin.  These properties are typically anchored by grocery and drug stores, complemented with additional stores providing a wide range of other goods and services.

The Company assesses and measures operating results on an individual property basis for each of its investment properties based on property net operating income.  Because all of the Company's investment properties exhibit highly similar economic characteristics, generally have tenants that offer products catering to the day-to-day living needs of individuals and offer similar degrees of risk and opportunities for growth, the shopping centers have been aggregated and reported as one operating segment.

The property net operating income is summarized in the following table for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, along with reconciliation to income from continuing operations.  Net investment properties and other related segment assets, non-segment assets and total assets are also presented as of June 30, 2006 and 2005:

19

INLAND REAL ESTATE CORPORATION
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2006 (unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share data and square footage amounts)

(13) Commitments and Contingencies

The Company is subject, from time to time, to various legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business.  While the resolution of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty, management believes, based on currently available information, that the final outcome of such matters will not have a material adverse effect on the financial statements of the Company.

(14) Subsequent Events

On July 17, 2006, the Company paid a cash distribution of $0.08 per share on the outstanding shares of its common stock to stockholders of record at the close of business on June 30, 2006.

On July 18, 2006, the Company announced that it had declared a cash distribution of $0.08 per share on the outstanding shares of its common stock.  This distribution will be paid on August 17, 2006 to stockholders of record at the close of business on July 31, 2006.

20

Item 2.

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Certain statements in this "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q constitute "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Federal Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.  Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical, including statements regarding management's intentions, beliefs, expectations, representations, plans or predictions of the future and are typically identified by words such as "believe," "expect," "anticipate," "intend," "estimate," "may," "will," "should" and "could."  The Company intends that such forward-looking statements be subject to the safe harbors created by Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.  These forward-looking statements involve numerous risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to be materially different from those set forth in the forward-looking statements.  Examples of factors which could affect our performance are set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 6, 2006, under the heading "Risk Factors."

Data in this section is presented in thousands, except per share data and square footage data.

This section provides the following:

·

an executive summary and our strategies and objectives;

·

the critical accounting policies that impact the treatment, for financial statement purposes, of certain items such as how we value our investment properties, recognize rental income and depreciate our assets;

·

a discussion of our consolidated balance sheets and consolidated statements of cash flows and how the changes in balance sheet and cash flow items from period to period impact our liquidity and capital resources;

·

a discussion of our results of operations, including changes in funds from operations ("FFO") from year to year and a discussion of the impact that inflation may have on our results; and

·

a discussion of the important factors that may impact your investment.

We have qualified as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code") for federal income tax purposes commencing with the tax year ending December 31, 1995.  So long as we qualify for treatment as a REIT, we generally will not be subject to federal income tax to the extent we meet the requirements of the tests imposed by the Code.  If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we will be subject to federal income tax on our taxable income at regular corporate tax rates.  Even if we qualify for taxation as a REIT, we may be subject to certain state and local taxes on our income and property and federal income and excise taxes on our undistributed income.

Additionally, in connection with the Tax Relief Extension Act of 1999, which became effective January 1, 2001, we are permitted to participate in certain activities that were previously prohibited in order to maintain our qualification as a REIT, so long as these activities are conducted in entities that elect to be treated as taxable REIT subsidiaries ("TRS") under the Code, subject to certain limitations.  As such, the TRS is subject to federal and state income taxes on the income from these activities.

Executive Summary

We are an owner/operator of Neighborhood Retail Centers (gross leasable areas ranging from 5,000 to 150,000 square feet) and Community Centers (gross leasable areas in excess of 150,000 square feet).  We are a self-administered REIT incorporated under Maryland law.  Our investment properties are located primarily within approximately 400 miles of our headquarters in Oak Brook, Illinois.  Additionally, we own and acquire single-user retail properties located throughout the United States.  We also may construct or develop properties or render services in connection with such development or construction.  As of June 30, 2006, we owned interests in 144 investment properties.

21

Essentially all of our revenues and cash flows are generated by collecting rental payments from our tenants.  Our goal is to continue increasing our revenues by acquiring additional investment properties and re-leasing those spaces that are vacant, or may become vacant, at more favorable rental rates.  We believe we have significant acquisition opportunities due to our reputation and our concentration of properties in the Chicago and Minneapolis-St. Paul metropolitan areas.  We will use cash provided by our Dividend Reinvestment Plan, proceeds from financings on previously unencumbered properties, draws on our line of credit and earnings we retain that are not distributed to our stockholders to continue purchasing additional investment properties.

Our largest expenses relate to the operation of our properties as well as the interest expense on our mortgages payable.  Our property operating expenses include, but are not limited to, real estate taxes, regular maintenance, landscaping, snow removal and periodic renovations to meet tenant needs.  Pursuant to the lease agreements, tenants of the property are required to reimburse the Company for some or all of the particular tenant's pro rata share of the real estate taxes and operating expenses of the property.

We consider FFO a widely accepted and appropriate measure of performance for a REIT.  FFO provides a supplemental measure to compare our performance and operations to other REIT's .  Due to certain unique operating characteristics of real estate companies, NAREIT has promulgated a standard known as FFO, which it believes more accurately reflects the operating performance of a REIT such as ours.  As defined by NAREIT, FFO means net income computed in accordance with U.S. GAAP, excluding gains (or losses) from sales of operating property, plus depreciation and amortization and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnership and joint ventures in which the REIT holds an interest.  We have adopted the NAREIT definition for computing FFO.  Management uses the calculation of FFO for several reasons.  We use FFO in conjunction with our acquisition policy to determine investment capitalization strategy and we also use FFO to compare our performance to that of other REITs in our peer group.  Additionally, FFO is used in certain employment agreements to determine incentives payable by us to certain executives, based on our performance.  The calculation of FFO may vary from entity to entity since capitalization and expense policies tend to vary from entity to entity.  Items that are capitalized do not impact FFO whereas items that are expensed reduce FFO.  Consequently, our presentation of FFO may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures presented by other REITs.  FFO does not represent cash flows from operations as defined by U.S. GAAP, it is not indicative of cash available to fund all cash flow needs and liquidity, including our ability to pay distributions and should not be considered as an alternative to net income, as determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP, for purposes of evaluating our operating performance.

We believe EBITDA is useful to us and to an investor as a supplemental measure in evaluating our financial performance because it excludes expenses that we believe may not be indicative of our operating performance.  EBITDA is defined as earnings (losses) from continuing operations, calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP, excluding: (1) interest expense; (2) income tax benefit or expenses; (3) depreciation and amortization.  By excluding interest expense, EBITDA measures our financial performance regardless of how we finance our operations and capital structure.  By excluding depreciation and amortization expense, we believe we can more accurately assess the performance of our portfolio.  Because EBITDA is calculated before recurring cash charges such as interest expense and taxes and is not adjusted for capital expenditures or other recurring cash requirements, it does not reflect the amount of capital needed to maintain our properties nor does it reflect trends in interest costs due to changes in interest rates or increases in borrowing.  EBITDA should be considered only as a supplement to net earnings and may be calculated differently by other equity REITs.

We look at several factors to measure our operating performance:

To measure our operating results to those of other retail real estate owners/operators in our area, we compare:

·

occupancy percentage; and

·

our rental rates to the average rents charged by our competitors in similar centers.

To measure our operating results to those of other REITs, we compare:

·

company-wide growth in income or FFO;

·

same store growth in income; and

22

·

general and administrative expenses as a percentage of investment in properties.

Based on the above measures, we have historically performed relatively in-line with those in our property sector peer group.

There are costs-and issues associated with re-leasing our properties, including:

·

length of time required to fill vacancies;

·

possibly releasing at rental rates lower than current market rates;

·

leasing costs associated with the new lease such as leasing commissions and tenant improvement allowances; and

·

paying operating expenses without tenant reimbursements.

Strategies and Objectives

Our primary business objective is to enhance the performance and value of our investment properties through management strategies that address the needs of an evolving retail marketplace.  Our commitment to operating our centers efficiently and effectively is, we believe, a direct result of our expertise in the acquisition, development/re-development, either directly or through a joint venture, management and leasing of our properties.  We focus on the following areas in order to achieve our objectives:

Acquisitions:

·

We seek to selectively acquire well-located Single-user Retail Properties, Neighborhood Retail Centers and Community Centers.

·

We acquire properties either without financing contingencies or by assuming existing debt to provide us with a competitive advantage over other potential purchasers.

·

We concentrate our property acquisitions in areas where we have a large market concentration.  In doing this, we believe we are able to attract new retailers to the area and possibly lease several locations to them.  Additionally, we are able to get existing retailers to lease more space at our current investment properties.

Joint Ventures:

·

We actively pursue new development opportunities through joint ventures with established local developers.

·

We have formed joint ventures to acquire stabilized retail properties as well as properties to be re-developed and vacant land to be developed.  We earn fees from the joint ventures for providing property management, acquisition and leasing services.

Operations:

·

We actively manage costs to minimize operating expenses by centralizing all management, leasing, marketing, financing, accounting and data processing activities.

·

We improve rental income and cash flow by aggressively marketing rentable space.

·

We emphasize regular maintenance and periodic renovation to meet the needs of tenants and to maximize long-term returns.

·

We maintain a diversified tenant base consisting primarily of retail tenants providing consumer goods and services.

·

We proactively review our existing portfolio for potential re-development opportunities.

23

Acquisitions and Dispositions

During the six months ended June 30, 2006 and the year ended December 31, 2005, we completed the following acquisitions and dispositions:

Acquisitions during the six months ended June 30, 2006:

·

Five investment properties, totaling approximately 1,103,000 square feet, for approximately $225,844 in the aggregate;

·

54 acres of vacant land through our joint venture with TMK Development, Ltd for approximately $8,400;

·

Vacant parcel of land at Shakopee Valley Marketplace for approximately $848; and

·

31 acres of vacant land through our joint venture with North American Real Estate, Inc. for approximately $18,000.

Dispositions during the six months ended June 30, 2006:

·

15 acres of vacant land through our joint venture with TMK Development, Ltd; and

·

Three investment properties.

Total proceeds from these sales were approximately $9,146.

Acquisitions during the year ended December 31, 2005:

·

Six investment properties, totaling approximately 1,036,000 square feet for approximately $143,821.

Dispositions during the year ended December 31, 2005:

·

Three investment properties;

·

Partial sale of approximately 70,000 square feet at certain investment properties;

·

One acre of vacant land at an existing investment property; and

·

Six investment properties contributed to our joint ventures with NYSTRS and Tucker Development Corporation.

Total proceeds from these sales were approximately $69,134.

The acquisition price per square foot is higher in 2006 than it was in 2005.  We believe that this does not reflect a market trend, but reflects the acquisition of Algonquin Commons.  Algonquin Commons is a lifestyle center that was purchased for approximately $275 per square foot.  This price is significantly higher than the amount per square foot that we typically pay for other centers, but is in-line with the average price for this type of center, based on comparable property sales.  

24

Critical Accounting Policies

General

A critical accounting policy is one that, we believe, would materially affect our operating results or financial condition, and requires management to make estimates or judgments in certain circumstances.  We believe that our most critical accounting policies relate to how we value our investment properties and determine whether assets are held for sale, recognize rental income and lease termination income, our cost capitalization and depreciation policies and consolidation/equity accounting policies.  These judgments often result from the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain.  U.S. GAAP requires information in financial statements about accounting principles, methods used and disclosures pertaining to significant estimates.  The following disclosure discusses judgments known to management pertaining to trends, events or uncertainties that were taken into consideration upon the application of critical accounting policies and the likelihood that materially different amounts would be reported upon taking into consideration different conditions and assumptions.

Valuation and Allocation of Investment Properties.  On a quarterly basis, in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, we review impairment indicators and, if necessary, conduct an impairment analysis to ensure that the carrying value of each investment property does not exceed its estimated fair value.  We evaluate our investment properties to assess whether any impairment indicators are present, including recurring operating losses and significant adverse changes in legal factors or business climate.  If an investment property is considered impaired, a loss is recorded to reduce the carrying value of the property to its estimated fair value.  No such losses have been required or recorded in the accompanying financial statements as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005.

In determining the value of an investment property and whether the property is impaired, management considers several factors, such as projected rental and vacancy rates, property operating expenses, capital expenditures and interest rates.  The capitalization rate used to determine property valuation is based on the market in which the property is located, length of leases, tenant financial strength, the economy in general, demographics, environment, property location, visibility, age, physical condition and investor return requirements among others.  Market capitalization rates fluctuate based on factors such as interest rates.  An increase in capitalization rates might result in a market valuation lower than our original purchase price.  Additionally, we obtain an appraisal prepared by a third party at the time we purchase the investment property.  All of the aforementioned factors are considered by management in determining the value of any particular property.  The value of any particular property is sensitive to the actual results of any of these uncertain factors, either individually or taken as a whole.  Should the actual results differ from management's judgment, the valuation could be negatively or positively affected.

We allocate the purchase price of each acquired investment property between land, building and improvements, other intangibles (including acquired above market leases, acquired below market leases, customer relationships and acquired in-place leases) and any financing assumed that is determined to be above or below market terms.  The allocation of the purchase price is an area that requires complex judgments and significant estimates.  The value allocated to land as opposed to building affects the amount of depreciation expense we record.  If more value is attributed to land, depreciation expense is lower than if more value is attributed to building and improvements.  We use the information contained in the third party appraisals as the primary basis for allocating the purchase price between land, building and improvements.  We determine whether any financing assumed is above or below market based upon comparison to similar financing terms for similar investment properties.  

The aggregate value of other intangibles is measured based on the difference between the purchase price and the property valued as if vacant.  We utilize information contained in independent appraisals and management's estimates to determine the respective as if vacant property values.  Factors considered by management in our analysis of determining the as if vacant property value include an estimate of carrying costs during the expected lease-up periods considering current market conditions, and costs to execute similar leases and the risk adjusted cost of capital.  In estimating carrying costs, management includes real estate taxes, insurance and other operating expenses and estimates of lost rentals at market rates during the expected lease-up periods, up to 24 months.  Management also estimates costs to execute similar leases including leasing commissions, tenant improvements, legal and other related expenses.  

25

We allocate the difference between the purchase price of the property and the as if vacant value first to acquired above and below market leases.  We evaluate each acquired lease based upon current market rates at the acquisition date and consider various factors including geographic location, size and location of leased space within the investment property, tenant profile and the credit risk of the tenant in determining whether the acquired lease is above or below market.  After an acquired lease is determined to be above or below market, we allocate a portion of the purchase price to the acquired above or below market lease based upon the present value of the difference between the contractual lease rate and the estimated market rate.  The determination of the discount rate used in the present value calculation is based upon a rate for each individual lease and primarily based upon the credit worthiness of each individual tenant.  The value of the acquired above and below market leases is amortized over the life of the related leases as an adjustment to rental income.  

We then allocate the remaining difference to the value of acquired in-place leases and customer relationships based on management's evaluation of specific leases and our overall relationship with the respective tenants.  The evaluation of acquired in-place leases consists of a variety of components including the costs avoided associated with originating the acquired in-place lease, including but not limited to, leasing commissions, tenant improvement costs and legal costs.  We also consider the value associated with lost revenue related to tenant reimbursable operating costs and rental income estimated to be incurred during the assumed re-leasing period.  The value of the acquired in-place lease is amortized over the average lease term as a component of amortization expense.  We also consider whether any customer relationship value exists related to the property acquisition.  As of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, we had not allocated any amounts to customer relationships.  

The valuation and possible subsequent impairment in the value of our investment properties is a significant estimate that can and does change based on management's continuous process of analyzing each property.

Cost Capitalization and Depreciation Policies.  We review all expenditures and capitalize any item that is deemed to be an upgrade or a tenant improvement.  If we capitalize more expenditures, current depreciation expense would be higher; however, total current expenses would be lower.  Depreciation expense is computed using the straight-line method.  Buildings and improvements are depreciated based upon estimated useful lives of 30 years for buildings and improvements, 15 years for site improvements and the remaining life of the related lease for tenant improvements.

Assets Held for Sale.  In determining whether to classify an asset as held for sale, we consider whether: (i) management has committed to a plan to sell the asset; (ii) the asset is available for immediate sale in its present condition; (iii) we have initiated a program to locate a buyer; (iv) we believe that the sale of the asset is probable; (v) we are actively marketing the asset for sale at a price that is reasonable in relation to its current value; and (vi) actions required for us to complete the plan indicate that it is unlikely that any significant changes will be made to the plan.

If all of the above criteria are met, we classify the asset as held for sale.  On the day that these criteria are met, we suspend depreciation on the assets held for sale, including depreciation for tenant improvements and additions, as well as on the amortization of acquired in-place leases and customer relationship values.  The assets and liabilities associated with those assets that are held for sale are classified separately on the consolidated balance sheets for the most recent reporting period.  Additionally, the operations for the periods presented are classified on the consolidated statements of operations as discontinued operations for all periods presented.

Recognition of Rental Income and Tenant Recoveries.  Under U.S. GAAP, we are required to recognize rental income based on the effective monthly rent for each lease.  The effective monthly rent is equal to the average monthly rent during the term of the lease, not the stated rent for any particular month.  The process, known as "straight-lining" rent, generally has the effect of increasing rental revenues during the early phases of a lease and decreasing rental revenues in the latter phases of a lease.  If rental income calculated on a straight-line basis exceeds the cash rent due under the lease, the difference is recorded as an increase to both deferred rent receivable and rental income in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.  If the cash rent due under the lease exceeds rental income calculated on a straight-line basis, the difference is recorded as a decrease to both deferred rent receivable and rental income in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.  In accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin 101, we defer recognition of contingent rental income, such as percentage/excess rent, until the specified target that triggers the contingent rental income is achieved.  We periodically review the collectibility of outstanding receivables.  Allowances are taken for those balances that we deem to be uncollectible, including any amounts relating to straight-line rent receivables.

26

Tenant recoveries are primarily comprised of real estate tax and common area maintenance reimbursement income.  Real estate tax income is based on an accrual reimbursement calculation by tenant, based on an estimate of current year real estate taxes.  As actual real estate tax bills are received, we reconcile with our tenants and adjust prior year income estimates in the current period.  Common area maintenance income is accrued on actual common area maintenance expenses as incurred.  Annually, we reconcile with the tenants for their share of the expenses per their lease and we adjust prior year income estimates in the current period.

Recognition of Lease Termination Income.  We accrue lease termination income if there is a signed termination agreement, all of the conditions of the agreement have been met and the tenant is no longer occupying the property.

Consolidation/Equity Accounting Policies.  We consolidate the operations of a joint venture if we determine that we are the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity or have substantial influence and control of the entity.  The primary beneficiary is the party that absorbs a majority of the entity's expected losses or residual returns, or both.  There are significant judgments and estimates involved in determining the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity or the determination of who has control and influence of the entity.  When we consolidate an entity, the assets, liabilities and results of operations of a variable interest entity are included in our consolidated financial statements.

In instances where we are not the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity or we do not control the joint venture, we use the equity method of accounting.  Under the equity method, the operations of a joint venture are not consolidated with our operations but instead our share of operations is reflected as equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures on our consolidated statements of operations.  Additionally, our net investment in the joint venture is reflected as investment in and advances to joint venture as an asset on the consolidated balance sheets.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

This section describes our balance sheet and discusses our liquidity and capital commitments.  Our most liquid asset is cash and cash equivalents which consist of cash and short-term investments.  Cash and cash equivalents at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 were $12,607 and $26,804, respectively.  See our discussion of the Statements of Cash Flows for a description of our cash activity during the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005.  We consider all demand deposits, money market accounts and investments in certificates of deposit and repurchase agreements purchased with a maturity of three months or less, at the date of purchase, to be cash equivalents.  We maintain our cash and cash equivalents at financial institutions.  The combined account balances at one or more institutions periodically exceed the Federal Depository Insurance Corporation ("FDIC") insurance coverage and, as a result, there is a concentration of credit risk related to amounts on deposits in excess of FDIC insurance coverage.  We believe that the risk is not significant as we do not anticipate the financial institutions' non-performance.

Income generated from our investment properties is the primary operating source from which we generate cash.  The table below presents lease payments to be received in the future from properties that we owned as of June 30, 2006.  Other sources of cash include amounts raised from the sale of securities under our Dividend Reinvestment Plan ("DRP"), our draws on the line of credit with KeyBank N.A., proceeds from financings secured by our investment properties and earnings we retain that are not distributed to our stockholders.  If necessary, such as for new acquisitions, we can generate cash flow by entering into financing arrangements or possible joint venture agreements with institutional investors.  We use our cash primarily to pay distributions to our stockholders, for operating expenses at our investment properties, for purchasing additional investment properties, joint venture commitments and to repay draws on the line of credit.

Minimum lease payments under operating leases to be received in the future, excluding rental income under master lease agreements and assuming no expiring leases are renewed, are as follows:

27

As of June 30, 2006, we owned interests in 144 investment properties.  Of the 144 investment properties owned, 20 are currently unencumbered by any indebtedness.  We generally limit our indebtedness to approximately 50% of the original purchase price, or current market value if higher, of the investment properties in the aggregate.  These 20 unencumbered investment properties were purchased for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $100,320 and would therefore yield at least $50,160 in additional cash from financing, using this standard.  In the aggregate, all of our 144 investment properties are currently generating sufficient cash flow to pay our operating expenses, debt service requirements and distributions equal to $0.96 per share on an annual basis.

The following table presents the principal amount of the debt maturing each year, including monthly annual amortization of principal, through December 31, 2010 and thereafter based on debt outstanding at June 30, 2006:

(a)

Included in the debt maturing during 2008 is our line of credit with KeyBank N.A.  This line of credit requires compliance with certain covenants, such as debt service ratios, minimum net worth requirements, distribution limitations and investment restrictions.  As of June 30, 2006, we were in compliance with such covenants.

The following table summarizes our consolidated statements of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005:

Statements of Cash Flows

Cash provided by operating activities during the six months ended June 30, 2006 decreased $2,077, as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2005, due primarily to a one-time lease termination fee in the amount of $6,100 from Dominick's Finer Food to terminate its lease at the Highland Park location received during the six months ended June 30, 2005.  This fee is included in lease termination income on our consolidated statements of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2005.  This decrease in cash is partially offset by cash flows from operations generated by properties acquired during 2006 and 2005, subsequent to the dates of their acquisitions and operating distributions received from the operations of our joint ventures.

Net cash used in investing activities increased by $49,263 as we acquired four investment properties during the six months ended June 30, 2006 at a cost of $60,311 and generated $9,146 of disposition proceeds, as compared to the acquisition of five investment properties during the six months ended June 30, 2005 at a cost of $77,694 and $47,249 of disposition proceeds.  Additionally, we invested approximately $14,370 for the purchase of land and one investment property in our joint ventures.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $27,685 during the six months ended June 30, 2006, as compared to $34,986 during the six months ended June 30, 2005.  This decrease is due primarily to a decrease in proceeds received from our line of credit, a decrease in loan proceeds, net of loan payoffs, and the purchase of minority interest units in one of our joint ventures, at a cost of $5,160 during the six months ended June 30, 2006.

28

Results of Operations

This section describes and compares our results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005.  As of June 30, 2006, we owned interests in 27 single-user retail properties, 89 Neighborhood Retail Centers and 28 Community Centers.  We generate almost all of our net operating income from property operations.  In order to evaluate our overall portfolio, management analyzes the operating performance of properties that we have owned and operated for the same three and six month periods during each year.  A total of 122 of our investment properties satisfied these criteria during the periods presented and are referred to herein as "same store" properties.  These properties comprise approximately 10.4 million square feet.  A total of nine investment properties, those that have been acquired during the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and the year ended December 31, 2005 are presented as "other investment properties" in the table below.  The "same store" investment properties represent approximately 75% of the square footage of our portfolio at June 30, 2006.  This analysis allows management to monitor the operations of our existing properties for comparable periods to measure the performance of our current portfolio.  Additionally, we are able to determine the effects of our new acquisitions on net income.

Net income available to common stockholders and net income available to common stockholders per weighted average common share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 are summarized below:

29

The following table presents the operating results, broken out between "same store" and "other investment properties," prior to straight-line rental income,  interest, depreciation, amortization and bad debt expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 along with reconciliation to income from continuing operations, calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

30

On a "same store" basis, (comparing the results of operations of the investment properties owned during the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 with the results of the same investment properties during the three and six months ended June 30, 2005), property net operating income increased by $476 with total rental income and tenant recoveries increasing by $1,734 and total property operating expenses increasing by $1,258 for the three months ended June 30, 2006.  Property net operating income increased by $1,327 with total rental income and tenant recoveries increasing by $957 and total property operating expenses decreasing by $370 for the six months ended June 30, 2006.

Total rental income and tenant recoveries for the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 were $44,734 and $44,161, respectively, and for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 these amounts were $88,653 and $89,068, respectively.  The primary reason for the decrease in rental income and tenant recoveries for the six months ended June 30, 2006, as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2005 is primarily the result of dilution from three investment properties held during 2005, that were later contributed to our joint venture with NYSTRS.  Partially offsetting this decrease is rental income on investment properties acquired later in 2005 and during the six months ended June 30, 2006.

Lease termination income decreased for the six months ended June 30, 2006, as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2005.  During the six months ended June 30, 2005, we received $6,100 from Dominick's Finer Food to terminate its lease at the Highland Park location.

General and administrative expenses increased $745 and $782, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, respectively, as compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2005.  This increase is due to an increase in salaries and other payroll related items and board of director fees.  Additionally, during the six months ended June 30, 2006, our marketing expenses have increased as we began utilizing a public relations firm.

Other income increased $424 and $1,060, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, respectively, as compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2005.  The primary reason for this increase is interest received on our mortgages receivable.  No such income was reflected during the three and six months ended June 30, 2005.  Additionally, dividend income received on our investment in securities increased for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006.

Interest expense increased for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, as compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, due to several factors.  We have increased our mortgages payable as well as the outstanding balance on our line of credit, resulting in higher interest expense.  Additionally, the interest rates charged on our variable rate mortgages have increased during the six months ended June 30, 2006.

Joint Ventures

Consolidated joint ventures are those where the Company is either the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity or has substantial influence over or controls the entity.  The primary beneficiary is the party that absorbs a majority of the entity's expected residual returns and losses.  The third parties' interests in these consolidated entities are reflected as minority interest in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.  All inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

Unconsolidated Real Estate Joint Ventures

Unconsolidated joint ventures are those where the Company is not the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity or does not have substantial influence over or control the entity.  The Company accounts for its interest in these ventures using the equity method of accounting.  Pertinent information related to these ventures is summarized in the following table.

31

The Company's proportionate share of the earnings or losses related to these ventures is reflected as equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.  Additionally, the Company earns fees for providing property management, leasing and acquisition activities to these ventures.  The Company recognizes only its share of these fees in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

The operations of properties contributed by the Company are not recorded as discontinued operations because of the Company's continuing involvement with these shopping centers.  Differences between the Company's investment in the joint ventures and the amount of the underlying equity in net assets of the joint ventures are due to basis differences resulting from the Company's equity investment recorded at its historical basis versus the fair value of certain of the Company's contributions to the joint venture.  Such differences are amortized over depreciable lives of the joint venture's property assets.  During the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, the Company recorded $683 and $714, respectively, of amortization of this basis difference.

32

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

We consider FFO a widely accepted and appropriate measure of performance for a REIT.  FFO provides a supplemental measure to compare our performance and operations to other REITs.  Due to certain unique operating characteristics of real estate companies, NAREIT has promulgated a standard known as FFO, which it believes more accurately reflects the operating performance of a REIT such as ours.  As defined by NAREIT, FFO means net income computed in accordance with U.S. GAAP, excluding gains (or losses) from sales of operating property, plus depreciation and amortization and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnership and joint ventures in which the REIT holds an interest.  We have adopted the NAREIT definition for computing FFO.  Management uses the calculation of FFO for several reasons.  We use FFO in conjunction with our acquisition policy to determine investment capitalization strategy and we also use FFO to compare our performance to that of other REITs in our peer group.  Additionally, FFO is used in certain employment agreements to determine incentives payable by us to certain executives, based on our performance.  The calculation of FFO may vary from entity to entity since capitalization and expense policies tend to vary from entity to entity.  Items that are capitalized do not impact FFO whereas items that are expensed reduce FFO.  Consequently, our presentation of FFO may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures presented by other REITs.  FFO does not represent cash flows from operations as defined by U.S. GAAP, it is not indicative of cash available to fund all cash flow needs and liquidity, including our ability to pay distributions and should not be considered as an alternative to net income, as determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP, for purposes of evaluating our operating performance.  The following table reflects our FFO for the periods presented, reconciled to net income available to common stockholders for these periods:

33

We believe EBITDA is useful to us and to an investor as a supplemental measure in evaluating our financial performance because it excludes expenses that we believe may not be indicative of our operating performance.  EBITDA is defined as earnings (losses) from operations excluding: (1) interest expense; (2) income tax benefit or expenses; (3) depreciation and amortization.  By excluding interest expense, EBITDA measures our financial performance regardless of how we finance our operations and capital structure.  By excluding depreciation and amortization expense, we believe we can more accurately assess the performance of our portfolio.  Because EBITDA is calculated before recurring cash charges such as interest expense and taxes and is not adjusted for capital expenditures or other recurring cash requirements, it does not reflect the amount of capital needed to maintain our properties nor does it reflect trends in interest costs due to changes in interest rates or increases in borrowing.  EBITDA should be considered only as a supplement to net earnings and may be calculated differently by other equity REITs.  The following table reflects our EBITDA for the periods presented, reconciled to income from continuing operations for these periods:

34

The following table lists the approximate physical occupancy levels for our investment properties as of the end of each quarter during 2006 and 2005.  N/A indicates we did not own the investment property at the end of the quarter.