AMENDMENT #2 TO PROXY
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Filed by the Registrant þ
Filed by a Party other than the
Registrant o
Check the appropriate box:
|
|
|
þ Preliminary
Proxy Statement |
o Confidential,
for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by
Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
o Definitive Proxy
Statement |
|
|
o Definitive
Additional Materials |
o Soliciting
Material Pursuant to § 240.14a-11(c) or
§ 240.14a-12 |
Phelps Dodge Corporation
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the
Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
|
|
o |
No fee required. |
|
þ |
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act
Rules 14a-6(i)(1)
and 0-11. |
|
|
(1) |
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
Common Stock, par value $6.25 per share
(including associated preferred share purchase rights)
|
|
(2) |
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
155,290,625 shares of Phelps Dodge Corporations
common stock |
|
|
(3) |
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on
which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was
determined): $90.66 (average of high and low prices of Phelps
Dodge Corporation common stock reported on the New York Stock
Exchange for such shares on August 22, 2006) |
|
|
(4) |
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
$18,274,395,063.54 |
|
|
(5) |
Total fee paid: $1,955,360.27 computed in accordance
with Rule 0-11(c)(i) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, by multiplying the proposed aggregate value of
the transaction by 0.0001070 |
|
|
þ |
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|
þ |
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by
Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for
which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the
previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or
Schedule and the date of its filing. |
|
|
(1) |
Amount Previously Paid: |
$3,218,407.21
|
|
(2) |
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
Schedule 14A, File No. 001-00082
Phelps Dodge Corporation
July 5, 2006
IMPORTANT SPECIAL MEETING OF PHELPS DODGE SHAREHOLDERS
l, 2006
Dear Fellow Shareholder:
You are cordially invited to attend a special meeting of the
shareholders of Phelps Dodge Corporation, to be held on
September 25, 2006, at 9:00 a.m. (MST), at The Heard
Museum, 2301 North Central Avenue, Phoenix, Arizona. At the
special meeting you will be asked to approve four proposals
presented for your consideration.
The proposals relate to Phelps Dodges agreement to combine
with Inco Limited to create an industry-leading, diversified
metals and mining company. The combined company would have one
of the industrys most exciting portfolios of development
projects and the scale and management expertise to pursue their
development successfully. The creation of this new company would
give us the size and diversification to better manage
cyclicality, stabilize earnings and increase shareholder returns.
Phelps Dodge first announced this transaction on June 26,
2006. Under the terms of a combination agreement between Phelps
Dodge and Inco, Phelps Dodge will acquire all of the outstanding
common shares of Inco for a combination of cash and common
shares of Phelps Dodge having a value of Cdn.$87.73 (U.S.$78.66)
per Inco share, based upon the closing price of Phelps Dodge
stock and the closing U.S./Canadian dollar exchange rate on
August 22, 2006. Each shareholder of Inco would receive
0.672 shares of Phelps Dodge common stock plus Cdn.$20.25
(or, at such holders option, the U.S. dollar
equivalent) per share in cash for each Inco common share. The
Phelps Dodge board of directors also announced, as part of the
transaction, a share repurchase program, to be commenced after
closing, of up to $5.0 billion.
The combination will be effected pursuant to a plan of
arrangement under Section 192 of the Canada Business
Corporations Act under which Phelps Dodge Canada Inc., our
recently formed, wholly owned subsidiary, will acquire all of
Incos outstanding common shares and Inco will amalgamate
with a wholly owned subsidiary of Phelps Dodge Canada Inc.
In order to complete the proposed transaction, we are asking you
to approve the following proposals, together with two proposals
regarding adjournment of the meeting:
|
|
|
1. a proposal to amend and restate Phelps Dodges
restated certificate of incorporation in the form attached as
Annex B to the proxy statement to which this letter is
attached, which we refer to as the charter amendment proposal,
to (i) change the companys name to Phelps Dodge Inco
Corporation from Phelps Dodge Corporation, (ii) increase
the number of authorized shares of the common stock of Phelps
Dodge from 300 million to 800 million and
(iii) increase the maximum number of members of Phelps
Dodges board of directors from 12 to 15; and |
|
|
2. the proposed issuance of Phelps Dodge common stock to
Inco securityholders in connection with the combination of
Phelps Dodge with Inco, which we refer to as the share issuance
proposal. |
Approval of the charter amendment proposal requires the
affirmative vote of a majority of all outstanding shares of
Phelps Dodge common stock entitled to vote on the matter.
Approval of the share issuance proposal requires the affirmative
vote of a majority of the votes cast on such matter, provided
that the total vote cast on the proposal represents a majority
of all outstanding shares of Phelps Dodge common stock entitled
to vote on the matter.
Your board of directors has determined that the charter
amendment proposal, the share issuance proposal and the
combination is in the best interest of Phelps Dodge and its
shareholders, has unanimously approved the charter amendment
proposal and the share issuance proposal, and unanimously
recommends that you vote FOR approval of the charter
amendment proposal and FOR the share issuance
proposal.
Detailed information regarding the two proposals is contained in
the accompanying proxy statement. In view of the importance of
the actions to be taken at the special meeting, we urge you to
read the accompanying proxy statement carefully. Regardless of
the number of shares you own, we request that you
complete, sign, date and mail the enclosed proxy card promptly
in the accompanying envelope, which requires no postage if
mailed in the United States. You may also vote your shares by
telephone or through the Internet by following the instructions
on the enclosed proxy card or voting instruction form.
You may, of course, attend the special meeting and vote in
person, even if you have previously returned your proxy card.
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT. Regardless of the number of
shares of Phelps Dodge common stock you own, we urge you to vote
FOR approval of the charter amendment proposal and
FOR the share issuance proposal. Finally, if you
have any questions or need assistance in voting your shares of
Phelps Dodge common stock, please call D.F. King & Co.,
Inc., which is assisting Phelps Dodge, toll-free at
1-800-659-5550 (U.S.
and Canada). Non-U.S. or non-Canadian investors may contact
D.F. King at +44 20 7920 9700.
On behalf of your board of directors, thank you for your
continued support and cooperation.
|
|
|
|
|
J. Steven Whisler |
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
This proxy statement is
dated l ,
2006 and is expected to be first mailed to our shareholders on
or
about l ,
2006.
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TO THE SHAREHOLDERS OF PHELPS DODGE CORPORATION:
A special meeting of shareholders of Phelps Dodge Corporation
will be held at The Heard Museum, 2301 North Central Avenue,
Phoenix, Arizona, on September 25, 2006, at 9:00 a.m.
(MST), for the following purposes:
|
|
|
1. to consider and vote on a proposal to amend and restate
Phelps Dodges restated certificate of incorporation to
(i) change the companys name to Phelps Dodge Inco
Corporation from Phelps Dodge Corporation, (ii) increase
the number of authorized shares of Phelps Dodge common stock
from 300 million to 800 million shares and
(iii) increase the maximum number of members of Phelps
Dodges board of directors from 12 to 15; |
|
|
2. to consider and vote on the proposed issuance of Phelps
Dodge common stock, par value $6.25 per share, to Inco
securityholders in connection with the combination of Phelps
Dodge with Inco; |
|
|
|
3. in the event that there are not sufficient votes for
approval of the charter amendment proposal at the special
meeting, to consider and vote upon any proposal to postpone or
adjourn the special meeting to a later date to solicit
additional proxies with respect to such proposal, which we refer
to as the charter amendment adjournment proposal; |
|
|
|
|
4. in the event that there are not sufficient votes for
approval of the share issuance proposal at the special meeting,
to consider and vote upon any proposal to postpone or adjourn
the special meeting to a later date to solicit additional
proxies with respect to such proposal, which we refer to as the
share issuance adjournment proposal; and |
|
|
|
|
5. to conduct any other business as may be properly brought
before the special meeting. |
|
Your board of directors has determined that the charter
amendment proposal, the share issuance proposal and the
combination is in the best interest of Phelps Dodge and its
shareholders, has unanimously approved the charter amendment
proposal and the share issuance proposal, and unanimously
recommends that you vote FOR approval of the charter
amendment proposal, FOR the share issuance proposal,
FOR the charter amendment adjournment proposal and
FOR the share issuance adjournment proposal.
Only holders of record of the common stock of Phelps Dodge at
the close of business on August 24, 2006 will be entitled
to notice of and to vote at the special meeting or at any
adjournments or postponement of the special meeting. On
August 24, 2006, we
had l common
shares outstanding.
If you participate in the Mellon Investor Services, L.L.C.
Investor Services Program for Phelps Dodge shareholders, all
common shares held for your account under that service will be
voted in accordance with your proxy.
Proxies are solicited by the board of directors. If you are a
shareholder of record, you may revoke your proxy before it is
voted at the special meeting by delivering a signed revocation
letter or new proxy, dated later than your first proxy, to
Catherine R. Hardwick, Assistant General Counsel and Secretary.
Any shareholder of record may attend the special meeting and
vote in person even if he/she previously has returned a proxy.
If your shares of Phelps Dodge common stock are held in
street name by a broker or bank, you should contact
the person responsible for your account to revoke your proxy or
to arrange to vote in person at the special meeting.
Shareholders are asked to access electronic voting via the
Internet or telephone voting as described on the enclosed proxy
card or voting instruction form, or complete, sign, date and
mail the enclosed proxy
card or voting instruction form promptly in the enclosed
envelope, which requires no postage if mailed in the United
States. Your vote is important, and you are requested to act at
your first convenience.
This Proxy Statement and accompanying materials are first being
sent to shareholders
on l ,
2006. Phelps Dodges principal executive office is located
at One North Central Avenue, Phoenix, Arizona 85004.
|
|
|
By Order of the Board of Directors, |
|
|
Catherine R. Hardwick |
|
Assistant General Counsel and Secretary |
Phoenix, Arizona
l ,
2006
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT
Whether or not you plan to attend the special meeting, please
complete, sign, date and mail the enclosed proxy card, or voting
instruction form, promptly in the enclosed envelope, which
requires no postage if mailed in the United States. Should
you prefer, you may vote by delivering your proxy via telephone
or via the Internet by following the instructions on your
enclosed proxy card or voting instruction form. Remember, if you
do not return your proxy card or vote by telephone or via the
Internet, or in person, or if you abstain from voting, it will
have the same effect as a vote against adoption of the charter
amendment proposal.
If you have any questions or need assistance in voting your
shares of Phelps Dodge common stock, please call D.F. King
& Co., Inc., which is assisting your company, toll-free at
1-800-659-5550 (U.S.
& Canada). Non-U.S. or non-Canadian investors may contact
D.F. King at +44 20 7920 9700.
Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
iv |
|
|
|
|
iv |
|
|
|
|
iv |
|
|
|
|
v |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
|
|
60 |
|
i
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
ii
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Annex A |
|
|
|
|
Annex B |
|
|
|
|
Annex C |
|
|
|
|
Annex D |
|
|
|
|
Annex E |
|
iii
REFERENCE TO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
This proxy statement incorporates by reference important
business and financial information about Phelps Dodge
Corporation (Phelps Dodge, we or
us) and Inco Limited (Inco) from
documents that are not included in or delivered with this proxy
statement. For a listing of the documents incorporated by
reference into this proxy statement, see Where You Can
Find More Information and Incorporation by Reference
beginning on page 100 of this proxy statement. This
information is available to you without charge upon your written
or oral request. You can obtain documents related to Phelps
Dodge and Inco that are incorporated by reference into this
proxy statement, without charge, from the Securities and
Exchange Commissions (the SEC) Web site
(www.sec.gov) or by requesting them in writing or by telephone
from Phelps Dodge:
|
|
|
Phelps Dodge Corporation
One North Central Avenue
Phoenix, Arizona 85004-4414
Attention: Assistant General Counsel and Secretary
(602) 366-8100 |
(All Web site addresses given in this proxy statement are for
information only and are not intended to be an active link or to
incorporate any Web site information into this proxy statement.)
Please note that copies of the documents provided to you by
Phelps Dodge will not include exhibits, unless the exhibits are
specifically incorporated by reference into the documents or
this proxy statement.
In order to receive timely delivery of documents requested
from Phelps Dodge in advance of the special meeting, you should
make your request no later than September 15, 2006.
INDUSTRY DATA
Industry statistics and data included in this proxy statement
are based on currently available public information. In
addition, statements in this proxy statement about our industry
and our position in our industry or any sector of our industry
or about our or the combined companys market shares, are
statements of our belief. This belief is based on industry
statistics and data and on estimates and assumptions that we
have made based on our knowledge of the market for our products
and our experience in those markets. We have not verified
industry statistics or data. Accordingly, we cannot assure you
that any of these estimates or assumptions are accurate or that
our estimates, assumptions or statements correctly reflect our
industry or our or the combined companys position in the
industry.
REPORTING CURRENCIES AND ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES
The financial information included in this proxy statement
regarding Phelps Dodge, including Phelps Dodges audited
consolidated financial statements and Phelps Dodges
unaudited consolidated financial statements, are reported in
U.S. dollars ($), (U.S.$) or (US$) and have been prepared
in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles (U.S. GAAP).
The financial information included in this proxy statement
regarding Inco, including Incos audited consolidated
financial statements and Incos unaudited consolidated
financial statements, are reported in U.S. dollars, unless
otherwise indicated, and have been prepared in accordance with
Canadian generally accepted accounting principles
(Canadian GAAP), which differs from U.S. GAAP
in certain significant respects. The differences, insofar as
they affect Incos consolidated financial statements,
relate to accounting for post-retirement benefits, currency
translation gains (losses), intangible assets, research and
development, exploration, asset impairment, convertible debt,
derivative instruments, investments, income and mining taxes,
reporting of comprehensive income, net earnings and
shareholders equity. A discussion of these differences is
presented in the notes to the financial statements incorporated
by reference into this proxy statement and, in particular,
Note 24 to Incos audited consolidated financial
statements and Note 17 to Incos unaudited
consolidated financial statements incorporated by reference into
this proxy statement.
iv
In this proxy statement, unless otherwise stated, dollar amounts
are expressed in U.S. dollars.
EXCHANGE RATES
Exchanging Canadian Dollars. The following table sets
forth, for each period indicated, the high and low exchange
rates for one Canadian dollar (Cdn.$) during that period, the
average of the exchange rates during that period, and the
exchange rate at the end of that period, in each case expressed
in U.S. dollars, based upon the noon buying rate in New
York City for cable transfers in foreign currencies as certified
for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months | |
|
|
|
|
Ended | |
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
June 30, | |
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In $ per Cdn.$1) | |
High
|
|
|
0.8528 |
|
|
|
0.8690 |
|
|
|
0.8493 |
|
|
|
0.7738 |
|
|
|
0.6619 |
|
|
|
0.6697 |
|
Low
|
|
|
0.9100 |
|
|
|
0.7872 |
|
|
|
0.7158 |
|
|
|
0.6349 |
|
|
|
0.6200 |
|
|
|
0.6241 |
|
Average
|
|
|
0.8852 |
|
|
|
0.8254 |
|
|
|
0.7682 |
|
|
|
0.7139 |
|
|
|
0.6368 |
|
|
|
0.6458 |
|
Period End
|
|
|
0.8969 |
|
|
|
0.8579 |
|
|
|
0.8310 |
|
|
|
0.7738 |
|
|
|
0.6329 |
|
|
|
0.6279 |
|
On June 23, 2006, the last trading day prior to the
announcement of the combination, the exchange rate for one
Canadian dollar expressed in U.S. dollars, based upon the
noon buying rate in New York City for cable transfers in foreign
currencies as certified for customs purposes by the Federal
Reserve Bank of New York, was $0.8896. On August 22, 2006,
the most recent practicable date prior to the filing of this
proxy statement, the exchange rate for one Canadian dollar
expressed in U.S. dollars, based upon the noon buying rate
in New York City for cable transfers in foreign currencies as
certified for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of
New York, was $0.8966.
Exchanging U.S. Dollars. The following table sets
forth, for each period indicated, the high and low exchange
rates for one U.S. dollar during that period, the average
of the exchange rates during that period, and the exchange rate
at the end of that period, in each case expressed in Canadian
dollars, based upon the noon buying rate in New York City for
cable transfers in foreign currencies as certified for customs
purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months | |
|
|
|
|
Ended | |
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
June 30, | |
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In Cdn.$ per $1) | |
High
|
|
|
1.1726 |
|
|
|
1.2703 |
|
|
|
1.3970 |
|
|
|
1.5750 |
|
|
|
1.6128 |
|
|
|
1.6023 |
|
Low
|
|
|
1.0989 |
|
|
|
1.1507 |
|
|
|
1.1775 |
|
|
|
1.2923 |
|
|
|
1.5108 |
|
|
|
1.4933 |
|
Average
|
|
|
1.1381 |
|
|
|
1.2115 |
|
|
|
1.3017 |
|
|
|
1.4008 |
|
|
|
1.5704 |
|
|
|
1.5485 |
|
Period End
|
|
|
1.1150 |
|
|
|
1.1656 |
|
|
|
1.2034 |
|
|
|
1.2923 |
|
|
|
1.5800 |
|
|
|
1.5925 |
|
On June 23, 2006, the last trading day prior to the
announcement of the combination, the exchange rate for one
U.S. dollar expressed in Canadian dollars, based upon the
noon buying rate in New York City for cable transfers in foreign
currencies as certified for customs purposes by the Federal
Reserve Bank of New York, was Cdn.$1.1241. On August 22,
2006, the most recent practicable date prior to the filing of
this proxy statement, the exchange rate for one U.S. dollar
expressed in Canadian dollars, based upon the noon buying rate
in New York City for cable transfers in foreign currencies as
certified for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of
New York, was $1.1153.
v
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
The following are some of the questions that you, as a
shareholder of Phelps Dodge, may have and answers to those
questions. These questions and answers, as well as the following
summary, are not meant to be a substitute for the information
contained in the remainder of this proxy statement, and this
information is qualified in its entirety by the more detailed
descriptions and explanations contained elsewhere in this proxy
statement. We urge you to read this proxy statement in its
entirety prior to making any decision.
|
|
|
Q1: |
|
Why am I receiving this proxy statement? |
|
|
A1: |
|
You are receiving this proxy statement and enclosed proxy card
because, as of August 24, 2006, the record date for the
special meeting, you owned shares of Phelps Dodge common stock.
Only holders of record of shares of Phelps Dodge common stock as
of close of business on August 24, 2006, will be entitled
to vote those shares at the special meeting. This proxy
statement describes the issues on which we would like you, as a
shareholder, to vote. It also provides you with important
information about these issues to enable you to make an informed
decision as to whether to vote your shares of Phelps Dodge
common stock for the matters described herein. |
|
|
|
|
As more fully described herein, we have agreed to combine Phelps
Dodge with Inco pursuant to a combination agreement, made and
entered into as of June 25, 2006, between Phelps Dodge and
Inco, as amended by the waiver and first amendment dated as of
July 16, 2006. The combination will be effected pursuant to
a plan of arrangement under Section 192 of the Canada
Business Corporations Act under which Phelps Dodge
Canada Inc., our recently formed, wholly owned subsidiary,
will acquire all of Incos outstanding common stock and
Inco will amalgamate with a wholly owned subsidiary of Phelps
Dodge Canada Inc. |
|
|
|
We are holding a special meeting of shareholders in order to
obtain the shareholder approval necessary to authorize and issue
shares of our common stock to shareholders of Inco, change our
companys name and increase the size of our board of
directors in accordance with the combination agreement. |
|
|
|
We will be unable to complete our combination with Inco unless
you approve the proposals described in this proxy statement at
the special meeting. |
|
|
|
We have included in this proxy statement important information
about a combination of our company with Inco, the combination
agreement and the special meeting. You should read this
information carefully and in its entirety. We have attached a
copy of the combination agreement and the waiver and first
amendment to this proxy statement as Annex A and
Annex E, respectively. The enclosed voting materials allow
you to vote your shares without attending the special meeting.
Your vote is very important and we encourage you to complete,
sign, date and mail your proxy card, as soon as possible,
whether or not you plan to attend the special meeting.
Convenient telephone and Internet voting options also are
available. |
|
Q2: |
|
When and where will the special meeting be held? |
|
|
A2: |
|
The special meeting is scheduled to be held at 9:00 a.m. (MST),
at The Heard Museum, 2301 North Central Avenue, Phoenix,
Arizona, on September 25, 2006. |
|
|
Q3: |
|
Who is entitled to vote at the special meeting? |
|
|
A3: |
|
Phelps Dodge has fixed August 24, 2006, as the record date
for the special meeting. If you were a Phelps Dodge shareholder
at the close of business on the record date, you are entitled to
vote on matters that come before the special meeting. However, a
Phelps Dodge shareholder may only vote his or her shares if he
or she is present in person or is represented by proxy at the
special meeting. |
|
1
|
|
|
Q4: |
|
What will happen at the special meeting? |
|
A4: |
|
At the special meeting, our shareholders will be asked to: |
|
|
|
1. consider and vote on a proposal to amend and restate
Phelps Dodges restated certificate of incorporation in the
form attached as Annex B to this proxy statement, which we
refer to as the charter amendment proposal, to (i) change
the companys name to Phelps Dodge Inco Corporation from
Phelps Dodge Corporation, (ii) increase the number of
authorized shares of the common stock of Phelps Dodge from
300 million shares to 800 million shares and
(iii) increase the maximum number of members of Phelps
Dodges board of directors from 12 to 15; |
|
|
|
2. consider and vote on the proposed issuance of Phelps
Dodge common stock to Inco securityholders in connection with
the combination of Phelps Dodge with Inco, which we refer to as
the share issuance proposal; |
|
|
|
|
3. in the event that there are not sufficient votes for
approval of the charter amendment proposal at the special
meeting, to consider and vote upon any proposal to postpone or
adjourn the special meeting to a later date to solicit
additional proxies with respect to such proposal, which we refer
to as the charter amendment adjournment proposal; |
|
|
|
|
|
4. in the event that there are not sufficient votes for
approval of the share issuance proposal at the special meeting,
to consider and vote upon any proposal to postpone or adjourn
the special meeting to a later date to solicit additional
proxies with respect to such proposal, which we refer to as the
share issuance adjournment proposal; and |
|
|
|
|
|
5. to conduct any other business as may be properly brought
before the special meeting. |
|
|
|
|
|
Your board of directors unanimously recommends that you vote
FOR the adoption of the charter amendment proposal,
FOR the share issuance proposal, FOR the
charter amendment adjournment proposal and FOR the
share issuance adjournment proposal. |
|
|
Q5: |
|
How does Phelps Dodge intend to finance the combination and
related transactions? |
|
|
A5: |
|
We have agreed to pay 0.672 shares of Phelps Dodge common
stock and Cdn.$20.25 (or, at the Inco holders option, the
U.S. dollar equivalent) in cash for each Inco common share
held immediately prior to the consummation of the combination.
In addition, holders of Inco restricted common stock and Inco
stock options will be entitled to receive shares of Phelps Dodge
common stock or options to acquire Phelps Dodge common stock,
respectively, in exchange for such securities. See The
Combination Agreement Combination
Consideration beginning on page 66 of this proxy
statement. |
|
|
|
|
The issuance of the requisite shares of the common stock of
Phelps Dodge to Incos shareholders requires the approval
of Phelps Dodges shareholders, which is one of the
purposes of the special meeting. Phelps Dodge will finance the
cash component of the combination consideration, in part, from
its available cash and with borrowings under new credit
facilities to be entered into in connection with the
combination. The new credit facilities will have aggregate
borrowing capacity of $10.45 billion, which, together with
available cash, will be available for the following purposes: |
|
|
|
to finance up to $4.1 billion of the cash
consideration to be paid by Phelps Dodge in connection with the
combination; |
|
|
|
to finance our post-combination share repurchase
program, pursuant to which we intend to repurchase up to
$5 billion of the common stock of Phelps Dodge; |
|
|
|
to repurchase or refinance up to $0.4 billion
of Incos indebtedness; |
|
|
|
to refinance liabilities outstanding under our and
Incos existing revolving credit agreements; and |
|
|
|
to finance transaction expenses related to the
combination, which we estimate will be approximately
$100 million. |
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phelps Dodge has received executed commitments from Citigroup
Global Markets Inc. and HSBC Securities (USA) Inc. for the
entire $10.45 billion principal amount of the new credit
facilities. The combination consideration and financing,
including the new credit facilities, are more fully described in
this proxy statement. See The Combination
Combination Consideration and Financing beginning on
page 29 of this proxy statement. |
|
|
Q6: |
|
What will the share ownership, board of directors and
management of Phelps Dodge look like after the combination? |
|
A6: |
|
We estimate that, upon completion of the combination, former
shareholders of Inco will own approximately 43% of the
outstanding common stock of the combined company. |
|
|
|
We expect that, upon consummation of the combination of our
company with Inco, J. Steven Whisler, the chairman and chief
executive officer of Phelps Dodge, will be chairman and chief
executive officer of the combined new company; Scott M. Hand,
the chairman and chief executive officer of Inco, will become
the vice chairman of the combined company and the president of
the combined companys nickel division; Timothy R. Snider,
the president and chief operating officer of Phelps Dodge, will
hold the same positions in the combined company; and Ramiro G.
Peru, executive vice president and chief financial officer of
Phelps Dodge, will hold the same positions in the combined
company. We expect Messrs. Whisler, Snider and Peru to be
based in Phoenix and Mr. Hand to be based in Toronto. |
|
|
|
We expect the board of directors of the combined company to be
composed of 15 members, 11 of which will be members of the
current Phelps Dodge board of directors and four of which will
be members of the current Inco board. |
|
Q7: |
|
Why does Phelps Dodge want to consummate a combination with
Inco? |
|
A7: |
|
The Phelps Dodge board of directors believes that a combination
of Phelps Dodge with Inco will create a combined company with
the scope, scale and financial strength to more efficiently
develop existing opportunities and assets and to capitalize
quickly on new growth and other opportunities within the mining
industry. The Phelps Dodge board of directors believes that the
combined company will be able to benefit from: |
|
|
|
its position as an industry-leading, diversified
metals and mining company with a portfolio of world-class assets
with leading market positions in multiple commodities; |
|
|
|
relatively lower cost positions in the combined
companys primary commodities, which should allow the
combined company to better weather any future downturns in
commodity prices; |
|
|
|
enhanced growth opportunities from a broad portfolio
of brownfield and greenfield growth projects, primarily in
nickel, copper, molybdenum and cobalt; |
|
|
|
significant synergies and cost savings; |
|
|
|
greater financial strength and flexibility as a
result of the combined companys increased size, asset
diversification and expected synergies |
|
|
|
|
|
increased market liquidity and the potential for
valuation enhancement as a result of the combined companys
position as the largest mining company based in North America; |
|
|
|
reduced risks associated with (i) price
fluctuations for any particular commodity and
(ii) production costs associated with any particular mining
or production site; |
|
|
|
reduced risks associated with political or economic
instability or natural disasters in any particular geographical
locale; and |
|
|
|
a highly skilled and experienced management team. |
|
|
|
|
The Phelps Dodge board of directors reasons for the
combination are discussed in more detail beginning on
page 39 of this proxy statement under The
Combination Phelps Dodges Reasons |
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
for the Combination. Please review the disclosure under
Risk Factors and Forward-Looking
Information in this proxy statement for a more complete
description of certain other considerations that you should
consider in deciding how to vote at the special meeting. |
|
Q8: |
|
When do you expect the combination to close? |
|
|
A8: |
|
We expect the combination to close in September 2006, subject to
the factors and conditions set forth elsewhere in this proxy
statement. See The Combination Agreement
Conditions to the Combination and The
Combination Regulatory Matters Related to the
Combination beginning on page 60 of this proxy
statement. |
|
|
Q9: |
|
Are there risks I should consider in deciding whether to vote
for the charter amendment proposals and the share issuance
proposals? |
|
|
A9: |
|
Yes. The proposed combination of our company with Inco is
subject to a number of risks and uncertainties. We may not
realize the benefits we currently anticipate from the
combination, including those described in the answer to Question
7 above, due to challenges associated with integrating the
companies. We may fail to realize increased earnings and cost
savings and enhanced growth opportunities described elsewhere in
this proxy statement. Further, we may fail to successfully
integrate the companies technologies and personnel in an
efficient and effective manner. In addition, the combination is
subject to the receipt of consents and approvals from government
entities that could delay completion of the combination or
impose conditions on the combined company. See Risk
Factors and The Combination Agreement
Conditions to the Combination beginning on pages 24
and 77 of this proxy statement, respectively. |
|
|
Q10: |
|
What vote is required to approve each proposal? |
|
A10: |
|
Approval of the charter amendment proposal requires: the
affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of our outstanding
common shares entitled to vote. |
|
|
|
Approval of the share issuance proposal requires: the
affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of our common
shares voting on the proposal, so long as the total vote cast on
the proposal represents a majority of our common shares
outstanding. |
|
|
|
|
Approval of the charter amendment adjournment proposal
requires: the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority
of our common shares voting on the proposal. |
|
|
|
|
|
Approval of the share issuance adjournment proposal
requires: the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority
of our common shares voting on the proposal. |
|
|
Q11: |
|
How do I vote? |
|
|
A11: |
|
If you are entitled to vote at the special meeting, you can vote
by proxy before the special meeting or you can vote in person by
completing a ballot at the special meeting. Even if you plan to
attend the special meeting, we encourage you to vote your shares
by proxy as soon as possible. After carefully reading and
considering the information contained in this proxy statement,
please submit your proxy by telephone or Internet in accordance
with the instructions set forth on the enclosed proxy card or
voting instruction form, or complete, sign, date and mail the
proxy card or voting instruction form, in the enclosed
postage-paid envelope as soon as possible so that your shares
may be voted at the special meeting. For detailed information,
please see Information About the Special
Meeting How to Vote beginning on page 64
of this proxy statement. |
|
|
Q12: |
|
I hold my shares in street name. How are my
shares voted? |
|
A12: |
|
If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a
bank or other nominee, you are considered the beneficial
holder of the shares held for you in what is known as
street name. If this is the case, this proxy
statement has been forwarded to you by your brokerage firm, bank
or other nominee, or their agent. As the beneficial holder, you
have the right to direct your broker, bank or other nominee as
to how to vote your shares. If you hold your shares in
street name and |
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
do not provide your broker, bank or other nominee with
instructions on how to vote your shares, your broker, bank or
other nominee will not be permitted to vote them on the charter
amendment proposal, the share issuance proposal, the charter
amendment adjournment proposal or the share issuance adjournment
proposal. Shares not voted in favor of the charter amendment
proposal will have the effect of a vote against that proposal.
You should, therefore, be sure to provide your broker, bank or
other nominee with instructions on how to vote your shares. Your
broker or bank may also provide telephone or Internet voting
options, and you should refer to the instructions that
accompanied this proxy statement. |
|
|
Q13: |
|
How many votes do I have? |
|
|
A13: |
|
You are entitled to one vote for each share of Phelps Dodge
common stock that you own as of the record date. As of the close
of business on August 24, 2006, there were
approximately l outstanding
shares of Phelps Dodge common stock. As of that date, less than
1% of the outstanding shares of Phelps Dodge common stock were
held by the directors and executive officers of Phelps Dodge. |
|
|
Q14: |
|
What constitutes a quorum? |
|
A14: |
|
Holders of at least a majority of our outstanding common stock
as of the close of business on the record date who are entitled
to vote must be present or represented by proxy in order to
constitute a quorum to conduct business at the special meeting
under our corporate by-laws. |
|
Q15: |
|
If I participate in the Mellon Investor Services, L.L.C.
Investor Services Program, how will my shares be voted? |
|
A15: |
|
If you participate in the Mellon Investor Services, L.L.C.
Investor Services Program for Phelps Dodge shareholders, all
common shares held for your account under that plan will be
voted in accordance with your proxy. |
|
Q16: |
|
What if I return my proxy card but do not mark it to show how
I am voting? |
|
A16: |
|
If your proxy card is signed and returned without specifying
your choices, your shares will be voted in favor of all
proposals in accordance with the unanimous recommendations of
the Phelps Dodge board of directors. |
|
Q17: |
|
Can I change my vote after I have submitted a proxy by
telephone or Internet or mailed my signed proxy card? |
|
A17: |
|
Yes. You can change your vote by revoking your proxy at any time
before it is exercised at the special meeting. |
|
|
|
You may revoke your proxy before it is voted at the special
meeting by delivering a signed revocation letter or a new proxy,
dated later than your first proxy, to Catherine R. Hardwick,
Assistant General Counsel and Secretary. If your shares are held
in street name you must contact your broker or
banker for instructions if you wish to revoke your voting
instructions. |
|
Q18: |
|
What do I need to do now? |
|
A18: |
|
Read and consider the information contained in this proxy
statement carefully, and then please vote your shares as soon as
possible so that your shares may be represented at the special
meeting. Your vote is important, so please act today. |
|
Q19: |
|
Who should I call if I have questions about the proxy
materials or voting procedures? |
|
A19: |
|
If you have questions or need assistance in voting your shares
or you need additional copies of the proxy statement, you should
contact D.F. King & Co., Inc., which is assisting us,
at 1-800-659-5550
(toll-free in the U.S. and Canada). Non-U.S. or non-Canadian
investors may contact D.F. King at
+44 20 7920 9700. You may also contact your
banker, broker or financial advisor for assistance. |
5
SUMMARY
This summary highlights selected information about the
combination, the combination agreement, as amended by the waiver
and first amendment, and the special meeting in this proxy
statement and does not contain all of the information that may
be important to you. You should carefully read this entire proxy
statement and the other documents to which this proxy statement
refers for a more complete understanding of the matters being
considered at the special meeting. See Where You Can Find
More Information and Incorporation by Reference beginning
on page 100 of this proxy statement. Unless we have stated
otherwise, all references in this proxy statement to:
(i) the combination are to the combination of
Phelps Dodge with Inco, (ii) the combination
agreement are to the Combination Agreement, made and
entered into as of June 25, 2006, between Phelps Dodge and
Inco, a copy of which is attached as Annex A to this proxy
statement, as amended by the waiver and first amendment,
(iii) the initial combination agreement are to
the unamended combination agreement, (iv) the waiver
and first amendment are to the Waiver and First Amendment
to the Combination Agreement, dated as of July 16, 2006, a
copy of which is attached as Annex E to this proxy
statement, (v) the arrangement are to the Plan
of Arrangement under Section 192 of the Canada Business
Corporations Act, which we refer to as the CBCA, pursuant to
which Phelps Dodge Canada Inc., Phelps Dodges recently
formed, wholly owned subsidiary, will acquire all of Incos
outstanding common shares and Inco will amalgamate with
PD Canada Subco, (vi) PD Canada Subco are
to the wholly owned subsidiary of Phelps Dodge Canada Inc. with
which Inco will amalgamate in accordance with the arrangement,
(vii) Amalco are to PD Canada Subco and Inco
after they have amalgamated, and (viii) the
U.S. dollar equivalent are to the Cdn.$20.25
cash component of the per share consideration to be paid by
Phelps Dodge pursuant to the combination agreement expressed in
U.S. dollars based upon the Bank of Canada noon exchange
rate for the Canadian dollar against the U.S. dollar on the
last business day immediately preceding the date shown on the
certificate of arrangement giving effect to the combination,
issued pursuant to subsection 192(7) of the CBCA after the
arrangement has been filed.
The Companies (page 29)
Phelps Dodge Corporation. Phelps Dodge is one of the
worlds leading producers of copper and molybdenum, and is
the worlds largest producer of molybdenum-based chemicals
and continuous-cast copper rod. PDMC, our mining division,
includes our worldwide, vertically integrated copper operations
from mining through rod production, marketing and sales;
molybdenum operations from mining through conversion to chemical
and metallurgical products, marketing and sales; other mining
operations and investments; and worldwide mineral exploration,
technology and project development programs. PDI, our
manufacturing division, produces engineered wire and cable
products principally for the global energy sector.
Phelps Dodge was incorporated as a business corporation under
the laws of the state of New York in 1885. Phelps Dodges
executive offices are located at One North Central Avenue,
Phoenix, AZ 85004-4414.
Inco Limited. Inco is one of the worlds premier
mining and metals companies and a leading producer of nickel.
Inco is also an important producer of copper, precious metals
and cobalt and a major producer of value-added specialty nickel
products. Inco also produces sulphuric acid and liquid sulphur
dioxide as by-products from its processing operations in
Sudbury, Ontario.
Incos business operations consist of three segments,
(i) the finished products segment, which comprises
Incos mining and processing operations in Ontario,
Manitoba and Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada, and refining
operations in the United Kingdom and interests in refining
operations in Japan and other Asian countries, (ii) the
intermediates segment, which comprises Incos mining and
processing operations in Indonesia where
nickel-in-matte, an
intermediate product, is produced and sold primarily into the
Japanese market, and (iii) the development projects
segment, which comprises Incos Goro nickel-cobalt project
under development in the French overseas territorial community
(collectivité territoriale) of New Caledonia, a nickel
processing plant being built in Dalian, China, an expansion of
Incos facilities in
6
Indonesia and the next phase of development at Incos
Voiseys Bay project (consisting of feasibility work for a
nickel processing plant and underground mine development).
Inco was incorporated in 1916 under the laws of Canada,
succeeding a business established in 1902. In 1979, Inco was
continued by articles of continuance under the Canada Business
Corporations Act and is governed by that Act. Incos
executive offices are located at 145 King Street West,
Suite 1500, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5H 4B7.
The Combination (page 29)
On June 25, 2006, we agreed to combine our company with
Inco pursuant to the combination agreement. The combination
agreement also provided that if Inco successfully completed its
acquisition of Falconbridge Limited prior to the consummation of
our combination with Inco in accordance with the terms of the
combination agreement, which we refer to as the Falconbridge
acquisition, we would combine our company with both Inco and
Falconbridge. However, on July 28, 2006, Inco announced
that it elected not to extend its bid for Falconbridge and the
support agreement between Inco and Falconbridge, which we refer
to as the support agreement, was terminated. Therefore, we will
combine our company with Inco only. The combination will be
effected pursuant to the arrangement.
Combination Consideration and Financing (page 29)
We have agreed to pay 0.672 shares of Phelps Dodge common
stock and Cdn.$20.25 (or, at the Inco holders option, the
U.S. dollar equivalent) in cash for each Inco common share
held immediately prior to the consummation of the combination.
Holders of Inco common shares may elect to receive the cash
payment in either Canadian dollars or U.S. dollars. In
addition, holders of Inco restricted common stock and Inco stock
options will be entitled to receive shares of Phelps Dodge
common stock or options to acquire Phelps Dodge common stock,
respectively, in exchange for such securities. See The
Combination Agreement Combination
Consideration beginning on page 67 of this proxy
statement.
The issuance of the requisite shares of the common stock of
Phelps Dodge to Incos shareholders requires the approval
of Phelps Dodges shareholders, which is one of the
purposes of the special meeting. Phelps Dodge will finance the
cash component of the combination consideration, in part, from
its available cash and with borrowings under new credit
facilities to be entered into in connection with the
combination. The new credit facilities will have aggregate
borrowing capacity of $10.45 billion, which, together with
available cash, will be available for the following purposes:
|
|
|
|
|
to finance up to $4.1 billion of the cash consideration to
be paid by Phelps Dodge in connection with the combination; |
|
|
|
to finance our post-combination share repurchase program,
pursuant to which we intend to repurchase up to $5 billion
of the common stock of Phelps Dodge; |
|
|
|
to repurchase or refinance up to $0.4 billion of
Incos indebtedness; |
|
|
|
to refinance liabilities outstanding under our and Incos
existing revolving credit agreements; and |
|
|
|
to finance transaction expenses related to the combination,
which we estimate will be approximately $100 million. |
Phelps Dodge has received executed commitments from Citigroup
and HSBC for the entire $10.45 billion principal amount of
the new credit facilities. We currently intend to refinance
indebtedness incurred under the
12-month term loan
facility in amounts then outstanding by accessing the capital
markets in one or more public or private offerings of debt
securities of Phelps Dodge Canada Inc., Amalco or Phelps Dodge
Inco at appropriate times following the completion of the
combination. The combination consideration and financing,
including the new credit facilities, are more fully described in
this proxy statement. See The Combination
Combination Consideration and Financing beginning on
page 29 of this proxy statement.
7
Post-Combination Shareholding, Board of Directors and
Management (page 31)
We estimate that, upon completion of the combination, former
shareholders of Inco are expected to own approximately 43% of
the outstanding common shares of the combined company.
We expect that, upon consummation of the combination of our
company with Inco, J. Steven Whisler, the chairman and chief
executive officer of Phelps Dodge, will be chairman and chief
executive officer of the combined new company; Scott M. Hand,
the chairman and chief executive officer of Inco, will become
the vice chairman of the combined company and the president of
the combined companys nickel division; Timothy R. Snider,
the president and chief operating officer of Phelps Dodge, will
hold the same positions in the combined company; and Ramiro G.
Peru, executive vice president and chief financial officer of
Phelps Dodge, will hold the same positions in the combined
company. We expect Messrs. Whisler, Snider and Peru to be
based in Phoenix and Mr. Hand to be based in Toronto.
We expect the board of directors of the combined company to be
composed of 15 members, 11 of which will be members of the
current Phelps Dodge board of directors and four of which will
be members of the current Inco board.
Phelps Dodges Reasons for the Combination
(page 39)
The Phelps Dodge board of directors believes that a combination
of Phelps Dodge with Inco will create a combined company with
the scope, scale and financial strength to more efficiently
develop existing opportunities and assets and to capitalize
quickly on new growth and other opportunities within the mining
industry. The Phelps Dodge board of directors believes that the
combined company will be able to benefit from:
|
|
|
|
|
its position as an industry-leading, diversified metals and
mining company with a portfolio of world-class assets with
leading market positions in multiple commodities; |
|
|
|
relatively lower cost positions in the combined companys
primary commodities, which should allow the combined company to
better weather any future downturns in commodity prices; |
|
|
|
enhanced growth opportunities from a broad portfolio of
brownfield and greenfield growth projects, primarily in nickel,
copper, molybdenum and cobalt; |
|
|
|
significant synergies and cost savings; |
|
|
|
greater financial strength and flexibility as a result of the
combined companys increased size, asset diversification
and expected synergies and cost savings; |
|
|
|
increased market liquidity and the potential for valuation
enhancement as a result of the combined companys position
as the largest mining company based in North America; |
|
|
|
reduced risks associated with (i) price fluctuations for
any particular commodity and (ii) production costs
associated with any particular mining or production site; |
|
|
|
reduced risks associated with political or economic instability
or natural disasters in any particular geographical locale; and |
|
|
|
a highly skilled and experienced management team. |
The Phelps Dodge board of directors reasons for the
combination are discussed in more detail beginning on
page 39 of this proxy statement under The
Combination Phelps Dodges Reasons for the
Combination. Please review the disclosure under Risk
Factors and Forward-Looking Information in
this proxy statement for a more complete description of certain
other considerations that you should consider in deciding how to
vote at the special meeting.
Unanimous Recommendation of the Phelps Dodge Board of
Directors (page 42)
After careful consideration, the Phelps Dodge board of directors
determined that each of:
|
|
|
|
|
the charter amendment proposal; |
|
|
|
the share issuance proposal; |
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
the charter amendment adjournment proposal; |
|
|
|
|
|
the share issuance adjournment proposal; and |
|
|
|
|
the combination, |
is in the best interests of Phelps Dodges shareholders and
unanimously approved each such action.
The Phelps Dodge board of directors unanimously recommends
that holders of Phelps Dodge common stock vote FOR
the charter amendment proposal, FOR the share
issuance proposal, FOR the charter amendment
adjournment proposal and FOR the share issuance
adjournment proposal.
In approving the charter amendment proposal, the share issuance
proposal, the charter amendment adjournment proposal, the share
issuance adjournment proposal and the combination and making its
unanimous recommendation, the Phelps Dodge board of directors
consulted with Phelps Dodges senior management and Phelps
Dodges financial and legal advisors and considered a
number of strategic, financial and other considerations referred
to under The Combination Phelps Dodges
Reasons for the Combination beginning on page 39 of
this proxy statement.
Opinions of Phelps Dodges Financial Advisors
(page 42)
Citigroup Global Markets Inc., which, along with its affiliates,
is referred to as Citigroup, has rendered its opinion to the
Phelps Dodge board of directors that, as of July 16, 2006,
and based upon and subject to the factors, assumptions,
procedures, limitations and qualifications set forth therein and
other factors Citigroup deemed relevant, the per share
consideration to be paid by Phelps Dodge pursuant to the
combination agreement (the Combination
Consideration) was fair, from a financial point of view to
Phelps Dodge. HSBC Securities (USA) Inc., which, along with its
affiliates, is referred to as HSBC, has rendered its opinion to
the Phelps Dodge board of directors that, as of July 16,
2006, and based upon and subject to the factors, assumptions,
procedures, limitations and qualifications set forth therein and
other factors HSBC deemed relevant, the Combination
Consideration was fair, from a financial point of view, to
Phelps Dodge.
The full text of the written opinions of Citigroup and HSBC,
each dated July 16, 2006, are attached as Annexes C
and D to this document and set forth assumptions made, general
procedures followed, factors considered and limitations and
qualifications on the review undertaken by each of Citigroup and
HSBC in connection with their respective opinions. Citigroup and
HSBC provided their respective opinions for the information and
assistance of the Phelps Dodge board of directors in connection
with its consideration of the arrangement. The Citigroup and
HSBC opinions are not recommendations to any shareholder as to
how such shareholder should vote or act on any matters relating
to the proposed Arrangement. Pursuant to separate engagement
letters between Phelps Dodge and each of Citigroup and HSBC,
Phelps Dodge has agreed to pay each of Citigroup and HSBC a
customary transaction fee, payable upon the completion of the
arrangement, as well as a more limited fee payable in connection
with the delivery of its initial respective opinion.
Interests of Phelps Dodge Employees in the Combination
(page 58)
You should be aware that certain Phelps Dodge employees,
including senior management, have interests in the combination
that are different from, or are in addition to, the interests of
Phelps Dodge shareholders generally. These interests relate to
the vesting of certain benefits under various compensation plans
and programs resulting from the combination.
Accounting Treatment of the Combination (page 60)
Upon completion of the combination with Inco, the
pre-combination shareholders of Phelps Dodge will own
approximately 57% of the combined company and the
pre-combination shareholders of Inco will own approximately 43%
of the combined company. In addition to considering these
relative shareholdings, the company also considered the proposed
composition and terms of the board of directors, the proposed
structure and members of the executive management team of Phelps
Dodge Inco, and the premium paid by Phelps Dodge to acquire
Inco, in determining the accounting acquirer.
9
Based on the weight of these factors, the company concluded that
Phelps Dodge will be the accounting acquirer. In accordance with
U.S. GAAP, Phelps Dodge will account for the combination
using the purchase method of accounting. Accordingly, the assets
and liabilities of Inco will be recorded by Phelps Dodge at
their respective fair values at the time of the combination. The
excess of Phelps Dodges purchase price over the fair value
of assets acquired, including identifiable intangible assets,
and liabilities assumed will be recorded as goodwill. Phelps
Dodge will record amortization expense over the useful lives of
amortizable intangible assets acquired in connection with the
combination.
Goodwill will be periodically assessed for impairment but not
less frequently than on an annual basis. To the extent that
goodwill becomes impaired, Phelps Dodge may be required to
record material charges relating to the impairment of that
asset. Any such charges could have a material impact on the
carrying value of the combined companys assets and the
combined companys results of operations. Long-lived
depreciable assets recorded at fair value pursuant to purchase
accounting will be depreciated, depleted or amortized over their
respective useful lives and will be evaluated for impairment
when events or changes in economic circumstances indicate the
carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. Metal
inventories recorded at fair value pursuant to purchase
accounting will be subject to periodic assessments for
lower-of-cost-or-market adjustments. To the extent that market
values fall below carrying values in future reporting periods,
the combined company may be required to record material charges
relating to such adjustments.
Regulatory Matters Related to the Combination
(page 60)
HSR Act. On July 12, 2006, we received from the U.S.
Department of Justice notification of early termination of the
waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust
Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, which we refer to as the
HSR Act.
Competition Act (Canada). On July 25, 2006, we
received an advance ruling certificate under the Competition Act
(Canada), which we refer to as the Competition Act Approval.
Investment Canada Act (Canada). The combination is
subject to the requirements of the Investment Canada Act
(Canada), as amended, which we refer to as the Investment Canada
Act, which prevents us from completing the combination until we
receive the requisite approval, actual or deemed, from the
Minister of Industry, which we refer to as the Investment Canada
Act Approval. We filed an Application for Review with the
Investment Review Division of Industry Canada on July 6,
2006. On August 21, 2006, the Minister of Industry extended
the review of our application for an additional 30 day
period as permitted under the Investment Canada Act.
EC Merger Regulation Filing. The combination is
subject to the requirements of Council Regulation
(EC) 139/2004 of 20 January 2004, which we refer to as the
Council Regulation, which prevents us from completing the
combination until we furnish required information and materials
to the European Commission, and the European Commission issues a
clearance decision or the applicable waiting period expires. We
filed the Form CO Merger Notification pursuant to the
Council Regulation with the European Commission on
August 1, 2006.
New York Stock Exchange Listing; Delisting and Deregistration
of Inco Common Shares (page 61)
It is a condition to the combination that the shares of our
common stock issuable in the combination be approved for listing
on the New York Stock Exchange and the Toronto Stock Exchange,
subject to official notice of issuance and the satisfaction of
certain other customary conditions. We received conditional
approval for the listing of our shares of common stock issuable
in the combination from the Toronto Stock Exchange on
July 31, 2006. If the combination is completed, Inco common
shares will cease to be listed on the New York Stock Exchange
and the Toronto Stock Exchange. In addition, after the
completion of the combination, (i) Phelps Dodge will become
a reporting issuer in certain provinces of Canada and will be
subject to ongoing statutory financial and other reporting
requirements of applicable Canadian securities laws, and
(ii) Inco may cease to be subject to the public reporting
and proxy solicitation requirements of the CBCA and the
securities laws and various securities regulations of Canada
10
and the United States or may request to cease to be a reporting
issuer under the securities laws of one or more of such
jurisdictions.
Completion of the Combination (page 77)
We expect to complete the combination of our company with Inco
upon satisfaction and/or waiver of all conditions precedent set
forth in the combination agreement. See The Combination
Agreement Conditions to the Combination
beginning on page 77 of this proxy statement. We currently
expect to complete the combination in September 2006. However,
it is possible that factors outside our control could require us
to complete the combination at a later time or not to complete
it at all. See The Combination Regulatory
Matters Related to the Combination beginning on
page 60 of this proxy statement.
No Dissenters Rights (page 61)
Under the New York Business Corporation Law, shareholders who
dissent with respect to any matters to be acted upon pursuant to
this proxy statement will not have any rights of appraisal or
similar rights.
The Combination Agreement (page 66)
The combination agreement, including the waiver and first
amendment, is described beginning on page 66 of this proxy
statement. The combination agreement is attached as Annex A
to this proxy statement and the waiver and first amendment is
attached as Annex E to this proxy statement. We urge you to
read the combination agreement and the waiver and first
amendment in their entirety because they contain important
provisions governing the terms and conditions of the combination.
Court Approval Will be Required to Complete the Combination
(page 77)
Under the Canada Business Corporations Act, a Canadian court
must approve the arrangement set forth in the Plan of
Arrangement pursuant to which the combination will be effected.
Under the arrangement, Phelps Dodge Canada Inc. will acquire all
of Incos outstanding common shares and Inco will
amalgamate with PD Canada Subco. As long as the arrangement has
received the approval required by Incos shareholders, Inco
will submit the proposed arrangement for review before the
Superior Court of Justice (Ontario). The court will consider,
among other things, the fairness and reasonableness of the
arrangement. The court may approve the arrangement in any manner
the court may direct, subject to compliance with such terms and
conditions, if any, as the court deems fit.
Conditions to the Combination (page 77)
Our and Incos obligations to complete the combination are
subject to conditions that must be satisfied, including:
|
|
|
|
|
approval of the charter amendment proposal and the share
issuance proposal by Phelps Dodges shareholders; |
|
|
|
approval of the Plan of Arrangement by Incos shareholders; |
|
|
|
receipt of an interim order and a final order approving the Plan
of Arrangement from the Superior Court of Justice (Ontario) in
form and terms reasonably satisfactory to Phelps Dodge and Inco,
and those orders having not been set aside or modified in a
manner unacceptable to Phelps Dodge and Inco; |
|
|
|
receipt of the Competition Act Approval and the Investment
Canada Act Approval; |
|
|
|
expiration or termination of the waiting period under the HSR
Act; |
|
|
|
expiration or termination of the waiting period under the
Council Regulation; |
|
|
|
receipt of approval from the New York Stock Exchange and the
Toronto Stock Exchange for the listing, subject to notice of
issuance, of the shares of Phelps Dodge common stock to be
issued to Inco shareholders; |
11
|
|
|
|
|
amendment and restatement of Phelps Dodges restated
certificate of incorporation and by-laws in accordance with the
applicable charter amendment proposal; and |
|
|
|
absence of any injunction, orders or laws restraining or
enjoining or making illegal the combination. |
On July 12, 2006, the waiting period under the HSR Act was
terminated and on July 25, 2006, we received the
Competition Act Approval and, therefore, the conditions relating
thereto under the combination agreement have been satisfied.
Neither party is required to complete the acquisition unless a
number of other conditions are satisfied or waived. These
conditions, any or all of which can be waived, include:
|
|
|
|
|
accuracy of the representations and warranties of the other
party, except as would not reasonably be expected to have,
individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse effect on
such party; |
|
|
|
performance in all material respects by the other party of its
pre-closing obligations under the combination agreement; and |
|
|
|
absence of any events or changes which, individually or in the
aggregate, has had or would reasonably be expected to have a
material adverse effect on the other party. |
In addition, we will not be obligated to complete the
combination if either (i) Inco has not completed the
acquisition of at least 50.01% of Falconbridges
outstanding common shares on the terms set forth in the
combination agreement or (ii) the support agreement has not
been terminated in accordance with its terms. On July 28,
2006, the support agreement was terminated in accordance with
its terms and, therefore, this condition has been satisfied.
Further, Inco will not be obligated to complete the combination
unless Phelps Dodge has taken all actions necessary to cause the
board of directors of Phelps Dodge to be constituted as
described in this proxy statement under Other Agreements
and Documents Phelps Dodges Post-Closing Board
of Directors and Officers beginning on page 81 of
this proxy statement.
Phelps Dodge will need the consent of its lenders to waive any
of its closing conditions under the combination agreement.
Termination of the Combination Agreement
(page 79)
The combination agreement may be terminated at any time prior to
the combination:
|
|
|
|
|
by mutual written consent duly authorized by the boards of
directors of Phelps Dodge and Inco; or |
|
|
|
by either Inco or Phelps Dodge, if: |
|
|
|
|
|
the arrangement shall not have been consummated by
March 31, 2007, subject to specified exceptions; |
|
|
|
any law is passed that makes the combination illegal or
otherwise prohibited or a governmental authority in the United
States or Canada issues a final, non-appealable order
restraining, enjoining or otherwise prohibiting consummation of
the combination; |
|
|
|
Inco shareholders fail to approve the arrangement or the Phelps
Dodge shareholders fail to approve the charter amendment
proposal and the share issuance proposal; |
|
|
|
the other party cannot satisfy the conditions related to its
representations, warranties, covenants and agreements in the
combination agreement on or before March 31, 2007; or |
|
|
|
the board of directors of the other party withdraws, modifies or
qualifies its recommendation in favor of the transactions
contemplated by the combination agreement. |
In addition, Inco may terminate the combination agreement under
specified circumstances to accept a superior proposal (as
defined on page 73 of this proxy statement), upon
satisfaction of various other conditions.
12
Effect of Termination; Termination Fees and Expenses
(page 79)
Termination of the combination agreement under certain
circumstances gives rise to an obligation to pay certain fees or
expenses of the other party.
|
|
|
|
|
If the combination agreement is terminated by either party in
specified circumstances, either Phelps Dodge or Inco may be
required to pay to the other party expenses incurred by the
other party in connection with the combination transaction up to
$40 million provided that, if a third-party acquisition
proposal had been made in relation to the party obligated to pay
expenses prior to termination and, within 12 months after
termination, that party consummates any merger, combination or
similar transaction pursuant to which a person or group acting
in concert acquires a majority of such partys shares
(aggregated with such persons or groups other
holdings), such party, if Phelps Dodge, will owe a termination
fee of $500 million to Inco or, if Inco, will owe a
termination fee of $475 million to Phelps Dodge, in all
cases less any amounts previously paid. |
|
|
|
Inco will owe to Phelps Dodge a termination fee of
$475 million if Inco or Phelps Dodge terminates the
agreement due to a withdrawal, modification or qualification by
Incos board of directors of its recommendation in favor of
the transactions contemplated by the combination agreement
(other than as a result of the occurrence of a material adverse
effect with respect to Phelps Dodge); |
|
|
|
Inco will owe to Phelps Dodge a termination fee of
$475 million if Inco terminates the combination agreement
to accept a superior proposal; |
|
|
|
Inco will owe to Phelps Dodge a termination fee of
$125 million if the combination agreement is terminated by
either Phelps Dodge or Inco if (i) the arrangement has not
been consummated by March 31, 2007, and between the date of
the initial combination agreement and the termination of the
combination agreement, an alternate business combination
involving Inco and not involving Phelps Dodge has been publicly
announced or otherwise communicated to the shareholders of Inco
or (ii) Incos shareholders fail to approve the
arrangement upon a vote taken thereon at the duly convened
meeting of Inco shareholders or at any adjournment or
postponement thereof; provided that, in each case, if within 12
months after termination, Inco consummates any merger,
combination or similar transaction pursuant to which a person or
group acting in concert acquires a majority of Inco shares
(aggregated with such persons or groups other
holdings), Inco will owe to Phelps Dodge $475 million, less
any amounts previously paid; |
|
|
|
Phelps Dodge will owe to Inco a termination fee of
$500 million if Inco terminates the combination agreement
due to a withdrawal, modification or qualification by Phelps
Dodges board of directors of its recommendation in favor
of the transactions contemplated by the combination agreement
(other than as a result of the occurrence of a material adverse
affect with respect to Inco); |
|
|
|
Phelps Dodge will owe to Inco a termination fee of
$125 million if the combination agreement is terminated by
either Phelps Dodge or Inco if (i) the arrangement has not
been consummated by March 31, 2007, and between the date of
the initial combination agreement and the termination of the
combination agreement, an alternate business combination
involving Phelps Dodge and not involving Inco has been publicly
announced or otherwise communicated to the shareholders of
Phelps Dodge or (ii) Phelps Dodges shareholders fail
to approve the charter amendment proposal and share issuance
proposal upon a vote taken thereon at the duly convened meeting
of Phelps Dodges shareholders or at any adjournment or
postponement thereof; provided that, in each case, if within 12
months after termination, Phelps Dodge consummates any merger,
combination or similar transaction pursuant to which a person or
group acting in concert acquires a majority of Phelps Dodge
common stock (aggregated with such persons or groups
other holdings), Phelps Dodge will owe to Inco
$500 million, less any amounts previously paid. |
13
SELECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL DATA OF PHELPS DODGE
The following statement of operations data for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 2005, and the
balance sheet data as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, have
been derived from Phelps Dodges audited consolidated
financial statements contained in its Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, which are incorporated
into this document by reference. The statements of operations
data for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, and
the balance sheet data as of December 31, 2003, 2002 and
2001, have been derived from Phelps Dodges audited
consolidated financial statements for such years, which have not
been incorporated into this document by reference.
The statement of operations data for the six months ended
June 30, 2006 and 2005, and the balance sheet data as of
June 30, 2006 and 2005, have been derived from Phelps
Dodges unaudited consolidated financial statements
contained in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
period ended June 30, 2006, which are incorporated into
this document by reference.
You should read this selected historical financial data together
with the financial statements that are incorporated by reference
into this document and their accompanying notes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At or for the | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months | |
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,* | |
|
Year Ended December 31,* | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2006(a) | |
|
2005(b) | |
|
2005(c) | |
|
2004(d) | |
|
2003(e) | |
|
2002(f) | |
|
2001(g) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
($ in millions, except per share amounts) | |
Statement of Operations Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and other operating revenues
|
|
$ |
5,216.8 |
|
|
|
3,852.5 |
|
|
|
8,287.1 |
|
|
|
6,415.2 |
|
|
|
3,498.5 |
|
|
|
3,173.2 |
|
|
|
3,420.4 |
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
$ |
1,537.5 |
|
|
|
700.6 |
|
|
|
1,764.9 |
|
|
|
1,474.9 |
|
|
|
142.8 |
|
|
|
(257.4 |
) |
|
|
(90.6 |
) |
Income (loss) from continuing operations before extraordinary
item and cumulative effect of accounting changes
|
|
$ |
822.1 |
|
|
|
1,052.5 |
|
|
|
1,583.9 |
|
|
|
1,023.6 |
|
|
|
(21.1 |
) |
|
|
(356.5 |
) |
|
|
(377.7 |
) |
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes**
|
|
$ |
(16.6 |
) |
|
|
16.5 |
|
|
|
(17.4 |
) |
|
|
22.7 |
|
|
|
39.2 |
|
|
|
41.3 |
|
|
|
48.2 |
|
Income (loss) before extraordinary item and cumulative effect of
accounting changes
|
|
$ |
805.5 |
|
|
|
1,069.0 |
|
|
|
1,566.5 |
|
|
|
1,046.3 |
|
|
|
18.1 |
|
|
|
(315.2 |
) |
|
|
(329.5 |
) |
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
805.5 |
|
|
|
1,069.0 |
|
|
|
1,556.4 |
|
|
|
1,046.3 |
|
|
|
94.8 |
|
|
|
(338.1 |
) |
|
|
(331.5 |
) |
Basic earnings (loss) per common share from continuing
operations***
|
|
$ |
4.06 |
|
|
|
5.45 |
|
|
|
8.06 |
|
|
|
5.41 |
|
|
|
(0.19 |
) |
|
|
(2.17 |
) |
|
|
(2.41 |
) |
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share from continuing
operations***
|
|
$ |
4.04 |
|
|
|
5.21 |
|
|
|
7.82 |
|
|
|
5.18 |
|
|
|
(0.19 |
) |
|
|
(2.17 |
) |
|
|
(2.41 |
) |
Basic earnings (loss) per common share from discontinued
operations, extraordinary item and cumulative effect of
accounting changes***
|
|
$ |
(0.08 |
) |
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
(0.14 |
) |
|
|
0.12 |
|
|
|
0.65 |
|
|
|
0.11 |
|
|
|
0.30 |
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share from discontinued
operations, extraordinary item and cumulative effect of
accounting changes***
|
|
$ |
(0.08 |
) |
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
(0.13 |
) |
|
|
0.11 |
|
|
|
0.65 |
|
|
|
0.11 |
|
|
|
0.30 |
|
Basic earnings (loss) per common share***
|
|
$ |
3.98 |
|
|
|
5.53 |
|
|
|
7.92 |
|
|
|
5.53 |
|
|
|
0.46 |
|
|
|
(2.06 |
) |
|
|
(2.11 |
) |
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share***
|
|
$ |
3.96 |
|
|
|
5.29 |
|
|
|
7.69 |
|
|
|
5.29 |
|
|
|
0.46 |
|
|
|
(2.06 |
) |
|
|
(2.11 |
) |
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At or for the | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months | |
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,* | |
|
Year Ended December 31,* | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2006(a) | |
|
2005(b) | |
|
2005(c) | |
|
2004(d) | |
|
2003(e) | |
|
2002(f) | |
|
2001(g) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
($ in millions, except per share amounts) | |
Balance Sheet Data (at period end)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash (including restricted cash)
|
|
$ |
2,656.1 |
|
|
|
2,763.9 |
|
|
|
1,937.5 |
|
|
|
1,200.1 |
|
|
|
683.8 |
|
|
|
349.8 |
|
|
|
386.9 |
|
Current assets (including cash)
|
|
$ |
5,231.5 |
|
|
|
4,539.8 |
|
|
|
4,070.7 |
|
|
|
2,661.7 |
|
|
|
1,790.0 |
|
|
|
1,428.2 |
|
|
|
1,531.2 |
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
11,805.6 |
|
|
|
10,058.9 |
|
|
|
10,358.0 |
|
|
|
8,594.1 |
|
|
|
7,272.9 |
|
|
|
7,029.0 |
|
|
|
7,584.3 |
|
Total debt
|
|
$ |
828.2 |
|
|
|
1,044.2 |
|
|
|
694.5 |
|
|
|
1,096.9 |
|
|
|
1,959.0 |
|
|
|
2,110.6 |
|
|
|
2,871.6 |
|
Long-term debt
|
|
$ |
704.4 |
|
|
|
970.3 |
|
|
|
677.7 |
|
|
|
972.2 |
|
|
|
1,703.9 |
|
|
|
1,948.4 |
|
|
|
2,538.3 |
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
$ |
5,586.1 |
|
|
|
5,399.9 |
|
|
|
5,601.6 |
|
|
|
4,343.1 |
|
|
|
3,063.8 |
|
|
|
2,813.6 |
|
|
|
2,730.1 |
|
Other Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared per common share****
|
|
$ |
4.5875 |
|
|
|
0.4375 |
|
|
|
3.125 |
|
|
|
0.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.375 |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$ |
1,645.1 |
|
|
|
944.7 |
|
|
|
1,769.7 |
|
|
|
1,700.1 |
|
|
|
461.6 |
|
|
|
359.1 |
|
|
|
310.7 |
|
Capital expenditures and investments in subsidiaries, net of
cash received and acquired
|
|
$ |
606.7 |
|
|
|
182.5 |
|
|
|
698.2 |
|
|
|
317.3 |
|
|
|
102.4 |
|
|
|
133.2 |
|
|
|
311.0 |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
$ |
(200.3 |
) |
|
|
103.8 |
|
|
|
(368.0 |
) |
|
|
(291.0 |
) |
|
|
(87.7 |
) |
|
|
(140.3 |
) |
|
|
(266.8 |
) |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
$ |
(739.2 |
) |
|
|
339.7 |
|
|
|
(685.8 |
) |
|
|
(947.2 |
) |
|
|
(48.8 |
) |
|
|
(244.8 |
) |
|
|
101.0 |
|
Division Results
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phelps Dodge Mining Company operating income (loss)
|
|
$ |
1,592.6 |
|
|
|
755.1 |
|
|
|
1,929.9 |
|
|
|
1,606.7 |
|
|
|
265.2 |
|
|
|
(65.0 |
) |
|
|
(83.6 |
) |
Phelps Dodge Industries operating income (loss)
|
|
|
22.1 |
|
|
|
17.3 |
|
|
|
14.6 |
|
|
|
18.8 |
|
|
|
13.7 |
|
|
|
(17.5 |
) |
|
|
12.2 |
|
Corporate and other operating loss
|
|
|
(77.2 |
) |
|
|
(71.8 |
) |
|
|
(179.6 |
) |
|
|
(150.6 |
) |
|
|
(136.1 |
) |
|
|
(174.9 |
) |
|
|
(19.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,537.5 |
|
|
|
700.6 |
|
|
|
1,764.9 |
|
|
|
1,474.9 |
|
|
|
142.8 |
|
|
|
(257.4 |
) |
|
|
(90.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copper
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copper production (consolidated basis thousand tons)
|
|
|
612.6 |
|
|
|
617.4 |
|
|
|
1,228.0 |
|
|
|
1,260.6 |
|
|
|
1,242.3 |
|
|
|
1,213.7 |
|
|
|
1,352.1 |
|
Copper production (pro rata basis thousand tons)
|
|
|
506.5 |
|
|
|
531.4 |
|
|
|
1,042.3 |
|
|
|
1,081.7 |
|
|
|
1,042.5 |
|
|
|
1,012.1 |
|
|
|
1,145.2 |
|
Copper sales from own mines (consolidated basis
thousand tons)
|
|
|
616.0 |
|
|
|
623.7 |
|
|
|
1,238.4 |
|
|
|
1,268.9 |
|
|
|
1,254.1 |
|
|
|
1,239.0 |
|
|
|
1,367.4 |
|
Copper sales from own mines (pro rata basis thousand
tons)
|
|
|
510.8 |
|
|
|
535.9 |
|
|
|
1,051.6 |
|
|
|
1,089.1 |
|
|
|
1,052.6 |
|
|
|
1,034.5 |
|
|
|
1,156.0 |
|
COMEX copper price (per pound)(h)
|
|
$ |
2.814 |
|
|
|
1.50 |
|
|
|
1.68 |
|
|
|
1.29 |
|
|
|
0.81 |
|
|
|
0.72 |
|
|
|
0.73 |
|
LME copper price (per pound)(i)
|
|
$ |
2.756 |
|
|
|
1.51 |
|
|
|
1.67 |
|
|
|
1.30 |
|
|
|
0.81 |
|
|
|
0.71 |
|
|
|
0.72 |
|
Commercially recoverable copper (pro rata basis
million tons):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ore reserves(j)
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
17.7 |
|
|
|
23.2 |
|
|
|
19.5 |
|
|
|
19.6 |
|
|
|
22.1 |
|
|
Stockpiles and in-process inventories
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.2 |
|
|
|
24.8 |
|
|
|
21.1 |
|
|
|
21.0 |
|
|
|
23.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
2006, 2005 and 2004 reflected full consolidation of El Abra and
Candelaria; prior to 2004, El Abra and Candelaria are reflected
on a pro rata basis (51 percent and 80 percent,
respectively). |
|
|
|
|
** |
As a result of the Companys agreement to sell Columbian
Chemicals Company (Columbian), previously disclosed as our
Specialty Chemicals segment, the operating results for Columbian
have been reported separately from continuing operations and
shown as discontinued operations for all periods presented in
the statement of operations data. |
15
|
|
*** |
Basic and diluted earnings per common share have been adjusted
to reflect the March 10, 2006, two-for-one stock split for
all periods presented. |
|
|
**** |
All periods presented reflect post-split cash dividends per
common share. |
All
references to per share earnings or loss are based on diluted
earnings (loss) per share.
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Reported amounts for the first six months of 2006 included
after-tax, net special charges of $28.8 million, or
14 cents per common share, for additional charges
associated with discontinued operations in connection with the
sale of Columbian Chemicals Company, which included transaction
and employee-related costs of $14.7 million, or
7 cents per common share, and a loss on disposal of
$14.1 million, or 7 cents per common share;
$16.5 million, or 8 cents per common share, for
environmental provisions; $4.9 million, or 2 cents per
common share, from the sale of Phelps Dodges High
Performance Conductors of SC & GA, Inc., which included
transaction and employee-related costs of $2.7 million, or
1 cent per common share, and a loss on disposal of
$2.2 million, or 1 cent per common share;
$4.7 million, or 3 cents per common share, for
additional charges associated with the completion of the sale of
substantially all of Phelps Dodges North American magnet
wire assets, which included transaction and employee-related
costs of $3.6 million, or 2 cents per common share,
and a loss on disposal of $1.1 million, or 1 cent per
common share; and $0.2 million for historical legal
matters; partially offset by $0.4 million for the sale of
non-core real estate. |
(b) |
|
Reported amounts for the first six months of 2005 included
after-tax, net special gains of $388.0 million, or
$1.92 per common share, for sale of a cost-basis
investment; $172.9 million, or 86 cents per common
share, for change of interest gain at Cerro Verde;
$15.8 million, or 7 cents per common share, for the
settlement of historical legal matters; partially offset by
special charges of $321.2 million, or $1.59 per common
share, for asset impairment charges; $26.9 million, or
13 cents per common share, for environmental provisions;
$2.4 million, or 1 cent per common share, for foreign
dividend taxes; and $0.3 million for magnet wire
restructuring activities. |
(c) |
|
Reported amounts for 2005 included after-tax, net special
charges of $331.8 million, or $3.28 per common share,
for asset impairment charges; tax expense of $88.1 million,
or 87 cents per common share, for foreign dividend taxes;
$86.4 million, or 85 cents per common share, for
environmental provisions; $42.6 million, or 42 cents per
common share, for charges associated with discontinued
operations in connection with the pending sale of Columbian;
$41.3 million, or 41 cents per common share, for early debt
extinguishment costs; $34.5 million (net of minority
interest), or 35 cents per common share, for tax on unremitted
foreign earnings; $23.6 million, or 23 cents per common
share, for a tax charge associated with minimum pension
liability reversal; $10.1 million, or 10 cents per common
share, for cumulative effect of accounting change;
$5.9 million, or 6 cents per common share, for transaction
and employee-related costs associated with the sale of North
American magnet wire assets; partially offset by special gains
of $388.0 million, or $3.83 per common share, for sale
of a cost-basis investment; $181.7 million, or
$1.80 per common share, for change-of-interest gains at
Cerro Verde and Ojos del Salado; $15.6 million, or 16 cents
per common share, for legal matters; $11.9 million, or 12
cents per common share, for the reversal of PD Brazil
deferred tax asset valuation allowance; $8.5 million, or 8
cents per common share, for the sale of non-core real estate;
$4.0 million, or 4 cents per common share, for the reversal
of U.S. deferred tax asset valuation allowance;
$0.4 million, or 1 cent per common share, for environmental
insurance recoveries; and $0.1 million for Magnet Wire
restructuring activities. The after-tax, net special charges of
$42.6 million associated with discontinued operations
consisted of $67.0 million (net of minority interests), or
66 cents per common share, for a goodwill impairment charge;
taxes of $7.6 million, or 8 cents per common share,
associated with the sale and dividends paid in 2005; and
$5.0 million, or 5 cents per common share, for a loss on
disposal of Columbian associated with transaction and
employee-related costs; partially offset by a deferred income
tax benefit of $37.0 million, or 37 cents per common share. |
(d) |
|
Reported amounts for 2004 included after-tax, net special
charges of $44.7 million, or 45 cents per common share, for
environmental provisions; $30.9 million (net of minority
interests), or 31 cents per common share, for early debt
extinguishment costs; $9.9 million, or 10 cents per common
share, for the write-down of two cost-basis investments;
$9.6 million, or 10 cents per common share, for taxes on
anticipated foreign dividends; $9.0 million, or 9 cents per
common share, for a deferred tax asset valuation allowance at
our Brazilian wire and cable operation; $7.6 million, or 8
cents per |
16
|
|
|
|
|
common share, for Magnet Wire restructuring activities;
$5.9 million, or 6 cents per common share, for asset
impairments (included $4.5 million, or 4 cents per common
share, for discontinued operations); and $0.7 million, or 1
cent per common share, for interest on a Texas franchise tax
matter; partially offset by special gains of $30.0 million,
or 31 cents per common share, for the reversal of a
U.S. deferred tax asset valuation allowance;
$15.7 million (net of minority interest), or 16 cents per
common share, for the reversal of an El Abra deferred tax asset
valuation allowance; $10.1 million, or 10 cents per common
share, for the gain on the sale of uranium royalty rights;
$7.4 million, or 7 cents per common share, for
environmental insurance recoveries; and $4.7 million, or 5
cents per common share, for the settlement of historical legal
matters. |
(e) |
|
Reported amounts for 2003 included after-tax, net special gains
of $2.4 million, or 3 cents per common share, for the
termination of a foreign postretirement benefit plan associated
with discontinued operations; $0.5 million, or 1 cent per
common share, for environmental insurance recoveries;
$0.2 million for the reassessment of prior restructuring
programs; $6.4 million, or 7 cents per common share, on the
sale of a cost-basis investment; $8.4 million, or 9 cents
per common share, for cumulative effect of an accounting change;
$1.0 million, or 1 cent per common share, for the tax
benefit relating to additional 2001 net operating loss
carryback; and an extraordinary gain of $68.3 million, or
76 cents per common share, on the acquisition of our
partners one-third interest in Chino Mines Company;
partially offset by charges of $27.0 million, or 30 cents
per common share, for environmental provisions (included a gain
of $0.5 million, or 1 cent per common share, for
discontinued operations); $8.0 million, or 9 cents per
common share, for a probable Texas franchise tax matter;
$2.9 million, or 3 cents per common share, for the
settlement of historical legal matters; and $2.6 million,
or 3 cents per common share, for asset and goodwill impairments. |
(f) |
|
Reported amounts for 2002 included after-tax, net special
charges of $153.5 million, or $1.82 per common share,
for Phelps Dodge Mining Company asset impairment charges and
closure provisions; $53.0 million, or 63 cents per common
share, for historical lawsuit settlements; $45.0 million,
or 54 cents per common share, for a historical arbitration
award; $26.6 million, or 32 cents per common share, for
early debt extinguishment costs; $23.0 million, or 27 cents
per common share, for Phelps Dodge Industries restructuring
activities; $22.9 million, or 27 cents per common share,
for cumulative effect of an accounting change;
$14.0 million, or 17 cents per common share, for
environmental provisions (included a gain of $0.6 million,
or 1 cent per common share, for discontinued operations);
$1.2 million, or 1 cent per common share, for the write-off
of two cost-basis investments; $1.0 million, or 1 cent per
common share, for the settlement of legal matters; and
$0.5 million, or 1 cent per common share, for the
reassessment and additional retirement benefits in connection
with prior restructuring programs; partially offset by special
gains of $29.1 million, or 35 cents per common share,
for environmental insurance recoveries; $22.6 million, or
27 cents per common share, for the gain on the sale of a
non-core parcel of real estate; $13.0 million, or 15 cents
per common share, for the release of deferred taxes previously
provided with regard to Plateau Mining Corporation; and
$66.6 million, or 79 cents per common share, for the tax
benefit relating to the net operating loss carryback prior to
2002 resulting from a change in U.S. tax legislation; and
$0.5 million, or 1 cent per common share, associated with
discontinued operations for the reassessment of a prior
restructuring program. |
(g) |
|
Reported amounts for 2001 included after-tax, net special gains
of $61.8 million, or 79 cents per common share, for
environmental insurance recoveries; $39.9 million, or 51
cents per common share, for the gain on the sale of Sossego;
$9.0 million, or 11 cents per common share, for an
insurance settlement for potential future legal matters; offset
by special charges of $57.9 million, or 74 cents per common
share, to provide a deferred tax valuation allowance;
$31.1 million, or 40 cents per common share, for
environmental provisions (included $1.4 million, or 2 cents
per common share, for discontinued operations);
$29.8 million, or 38 cents per common share, for
restructuring activities; $12.9 million, or 16 cents per
common share, for investment impairments; $2.0 million, or
3 cents per common share, for cumulative effect of an accounting
change; and $3.4 million, or 4 cents per common share, for
other items, net. |
(h) |
|
New York Commodity Exchange annual average spot price per
pound cathodes. |
(i) |
|
London Metal Exchange annual average spot price per
pound cathodes. |
(j) |
|
Ore reserves are calculated on an annual basis. |
17
SELECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL DATA OF INCO
The following statements of operations data for each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 2005, and the
balance sheet data as of December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
have been derived from Incos audited consolidated
financial statements contained in its Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, which are incorporated
into this proxy statement by reference. The statements of
operations data for the years ended December 31, 2002 and
2001, and the balance sheet data as of December 31, 2002
and 2001, have been derived from Incos consolidated
financial statements for such years, which have not been
incorporated into this document by reference.
The statements of operations data for the six months ended
June 30, 2006 and 2005, and the balance sheet data as of
June 30, 2006 and 2005, have been derived from Incos
unaudited consolidated financial statements contained in
Incos Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the
period ended June 30, 2006, which are incorporated into
this proxy statement by reference.
Inco prepares its financial statements in accordance with
Canadian GAAP. There are a number of differences between
Canadian and U.S. GAAP. The differences, insofar as they affect
Incos consolidated financial statements, relate to
accounting for post-retirement benefits, currency translation
gains (losses), intangible assets, research and development,
exploration, asset impairment, convertible debt, derivative
instruments, investments, income and mining taxes, reporting of
comprehensive income, net earnings and shareholders
equity. A discussion of these differences for the years ended
December 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005 and the six months ended
June 30, 2006 and 2005 is presented in the notes to the
financial statements of Inco incorporated by reference into this
proxy statement and, in particular, Note 24 to the audited
consolidated financial statements and Note 17 to the
unaudited consolidated financial statements of Inco.
You should read this selected historical financial data together
with the financial statements that are incorporated by reference
into this document and their accompanying notes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At or for the | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months | |
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30, | |
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005(a) | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004(a) | |
|
2003(a) | |
|
2002(a) | |
|
2001(a) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(Restated) | |
|
|
|
(Restated) | |
|
(Restated) | |
|
(Restated) | |
|
(Restated) | |
|
|
($ in millions, except per share amounts) | |
Statement of Operations Data(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$ |
3,025 |
|
|
|
2,315 |
|
|
|
4,518 |
|
|
|
4,278 |
|
|
|
2,474 |
|
|
|
2,161 |
|
|
|
2,066 |
|
Cost of sales and operating expenses, excluding depreciation and
depletion
|
|
$ |
1,754 |
|
|
|
1,219 |
|
|
|
2,633 |
|
|
|
2,348 |
|
|
|
1,735 |
|
|
|
1,378 |
|
|
|
1,416 |
|
Depreciation and depletion
|
|
$ |
151 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
263 |
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
$ |
131 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
Asset impairment charges
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,415 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
$ |
33 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
Income and mining taxes
|
|
$ |
239 |
|
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
408 |
|
|
|
432 |
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
(641 |
) |
|
|
(88 |
) |
Net earnings (loss)
|
|
$ |
674 |
|
|
|
537 |
|
|
|
836 |
|
|
|
619 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
(1,475 |
) |
|
|
302 |
|
Dividends per common share
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
|
0.10 |
|
|
|
0.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred dividends
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
Premium on redemption of preferred shares
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) applicable to common shares
|
|
$ |
674 |
|
|
|
537 |
|
|
|
836 |
|
|
|
619 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
(1,501 |
) |
|
|
276 |
|
Net earnings (loss) per common share basic
|
|
$ |
3.46 |
|
|
|
2.85 |
|
|
|
4.41 |
|
|
|
3.30 |
|
|
|
0.68 |
|
|
|
(8.21 |
) |
|
|
1.52 |
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At or for the | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months | |
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30, | |
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005(a) | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004(a) | |
|
2003(a) | |
|
2002(a) | |
|
2001(a) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(Restated) | |
|
|
|
(Restated) | |
|
(Restated) | |
|
(Restated) | |
|
(Restated) | |
|
|
($ in millions, except per share amounts) | |
Net earnings (loss) per common share diluted
|
|
$ |
3.03 |
|
|
|
2.41 |
|
|
|
3.75 |
|
|
|
2.95 |
|
|
|
0.64 |
|
|
|
(8.21 |
) |
|
|
1.49 |
|
Common shares outstanding (weighted average, in millions)
|
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
182 |
|
Balance Sheet Data (at period end)(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
13,209 |
|
|
|
11,291 |
|
|
|
12,010 |
|
|
|
10,716 |
|
|
|
9,058 |
|
|
|
8,596 |
|
|
|
9,630 |
|
Long-term debt
|
|
$ |
1,844 |
|
|
|
1,727 |
|
|
|
1,852 |
|
|
|
1,761 |
|
|
|
1,603 |
|
|
|
1,636 |
|
|
|
842 |
|
Convertible debt
|
|
$ |
262 |
|
|
|
418 |
|
|
|
362 |
|
|
|
418 |
|
|
|
418 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
Preferred shares
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
472 |
|
|
|
472 |
|
|
|
(a) |
Financial information for the six months ended June 30,
2005 and years ended December 31, 2001 through 2004,
reflect restatements that are discussed in Note 2 to the
consolidated financial statements in Incos Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for
the period ended June 30, 2006, and Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2005, that are incorporated into
this proxy statement by reference. |
|
(b) |
Inco financial data is prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP
and presented in U.S. dollars. |
The following table reconciles results as reported under
Canadian GAAP with those that would have been reported under
U.S. GAAP:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months | |
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30, | |
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005(a) | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004(a) | |
|
2003(a) | |
|
2002(a) | |
|
2001(a) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(Restated) | |
|
|
|
(Restated) | |
|
(Restated) | |
|
(Restated) | |
|
(Restated) | |
|
|
($ in millions, except per share amounts) | |
Net earnings (loss) Canadian GAAP
|
|
$ |
674 |
|
|
|
537 |
|
|
|
836 |
|
|
|
619 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
(1,475 |
) |
|
|
302 |
|
Increased post-retirement benefits expense
|
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
Currency translation gains (losses)
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
(62 |
) |
|
|
(89 |
) |
|
|
(219 |
) |
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
123 |
|
Increased intangible assets amortization expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Increased research and development expense
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
Decreased (increased) exploration expense
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
Decreased (increased) asset impairment charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(961 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Increased interest expense
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
Cash settlement of LYONs Notes tendered for conversion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized net gain (loss) on derivative instruments
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
Increased depreciation and depletion expense
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months | |
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30, | |
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005(a) | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004(a) | |
|
2003(a) | |
|
2002(a) | |
|
2001(a) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(Restated) | |
|
|
|
(Restated) | |
|
(Restated) | |
|
(Restated) | |
|
(Restated) | |
|
|
($ in millions, except per share amounts) | |
Increased income and mining tax expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decreased (increased) minority interest
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Change in accounting policy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Taxes on U.S. GAAP differences
|
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) before cumulative effect of a change in
accounting principle U.S. GAAP
|
|
|
543 |
|
|
|
502 |
|
|
|
628 |
|
|
|
477 |
|
|
|
(129 |
) |
|
|
(2,374 |
) |
|
|
395 |
|
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) U.S. GAAP
|
|
$ |
543 |
|
|
|
502 |
|
|
|
628 |
|
|
|
477 |
|
|
|
(146 |
) |
|
|
(2,376 |
) |
|
|
395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) per share basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) per share before cumulative effect of a
change in accounting principle
|
|
$ |
2.79 |
|
|
|
2.66 |
|
|
|
3.32 |
|
|
|
2.54 |
|
|
|
(0.82 |
) |
|
|
(13.13 |
) |
|
|
2.03 |
|
|
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.09 |
) |
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) per share basic
|
|
$ |
2.79 |
|
|
|
2.66 |
|
|
|
3.32 |
|
|
|
2.54 |
|
|
|
(0.91 |
) |
|
|
(13.14 |
) |
|
|
2.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) per share diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) per share before cumulative effect of a
change in accounting principle
|
|
$ |
2.47 |
|
|
|
2.29 |
|
|
|
2.87 |
|
|
|
2.30 |
|
|
|
(0.82 |
) |
|
|
(13.13 |
) |
|
|
1.99 |
|
|
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.09 |
) |
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) per share diluted
|
|
$ |
2.47 |
|
|
|
2.29 |
|
|
|
2.87 |
|
|
|
2.30 |
|
|
|
(0.91 |
) |
|
|
(13.14 |
) |
|
|
1.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Financial information for the six months ended June 30,
2005 and years ended December 31, 2001 through 2004,
reflect restatements that are discussed in Note 17 to the
consolidated financial statements in Incos Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q for the
three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2006, and
Note 24 to the consolidated financial statements in
Incos Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2005, each incorporated into this
proxy statement by reference. |
The selected financial data item Preferred shares in
the table above would be reported in the same amounts under
Canadian and U.S. GAAP. Under U.S. GAAP, Total
assets would be reported as $10,249 million at
December 31, 2005 (2004 $9,352 million;
2003 $7,959 million; 2002
$7,727 million; 2001 $9,755 million).
20
SELECTED UNAUDITED PRO FORMA FINANCIAL DATA
The selected pro forma financial information presented below
combines the historical balance sheets of Phelps Dodge with Inco
for the periods presented, as if the combination had been
consummated June 30, 2006, and combines the statement of
income of Phelps Dodge with Inco for the year ended
December 31, 2005, and the six months ended June 30,
2006, as if the combination had been consummated on
January 1, 2005, in each case after giving effect to the
combination and related transactions under the purchase method
of accounting in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States (U.S. GAAP). The pro forma
adjustments are described in the Notes to Unaudited Pro
Forma Combined Financial Statements beginning on
page 88 of this proxy statement. Shareholders are urged to
read such Notes carefully. The selected pro forma combined
financial information is not necessarily indicative of the
operating results or financial position that would have occurred
had the combination been consummated on the dates for which the
consummation of the combination are being given effect, nor is
it necessarily indicative of future operating results or
financial position. See Unaudited Pro Forma Combined
Financial Statements beginning on page 82 of this
proxy statement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
Year Ended |
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions, except |
|
|
per share data) |
Income Statement Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$ |
8,242 |
|
|
|
12,750 |
|
Income from continuing operations before cumulative effect of
accounting changes
|
|
$ |
1,272 |
|
|
|
2,012 |
|
Income from continuing operations per common share before
cumulative effect of accounting changes basic
|
|
$ |
3.56 |
|
|
|
5.73 |
|
Dividends declared per common share
|
|
$ |
4.59 |
|
|
|
3.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions, |
|
|
except |
|
|
per share data) |
Balance Sheet Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
37,273 |
|
|
Long-term obligations
|
|
$ |
13,285 |
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
$ |
17,872 |
|
|
Book value (per share)
|
|
$ |
49.74 |
|
21
UNAUDITED COMPARATIVE PER SHARE DATA
The following table presents historical per common share
information for Phelps Dodge and Inco, and the pro forma per
common share data giving effect to the combination of Phelps
Dodge and Inco, for the six months ended June 30, 2006, and
the year ended December 31, 2005. The pro forma combined
per share information does not purport to represent what the
combined financial position or results of operations would
actually have been if the combinations had occurred at
January 1, 2005, nor are they necessarily indicative of
Phelps Dodges future consolidated results of operations or
financial position. The information tabled below is prepared in
accordance with U.S. GAAP and should be read in conjunction
with the historical financial statements of the combining
corporations and the Selected Historical Financial
Data of Phelps Dodge and Inco beginning on page 14 of
this proxy statement, and the Unaudited Pro Forma Combined
Financial Statements beginning on page 82 of this
proxy statement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At or for the |
|
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
Year Ended |
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
Per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phelps Dodge(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book value(2)
|
|
$ |
27.38 |
|
|
|
27.57 |
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
4.06 |
|
|
|
8.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
4.04 |
|
|
|
7.82 |
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends(3)
|
|
$ |
4.59 |
|
|
|
3.13 |
|
|
|
Inco
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book value(2)
|
|
$ |
17.31 |
|
|
|
15.08 |
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
2.79 |
|
|
|
3.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
2.47 |
|
|
|
2.87 |
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
|
0.30 |
|
|
Pro forma:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined Phelps Dodge and Inco
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book value(2),(4)
|
|
$ |
49.74 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
3.56 |
|
|
|
5.73 |
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
3.55 |
|
|
|
5.62 |
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends(5)
|
|
$ |
4.59 |
|
|
|
3.13 |
|
|
|
Equivalent Inco(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book value
|
|
$ |
33.43 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
2.39 |
|
|
|
3.85 |
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
2.39 |
|
|
|
3.78 |
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends
|
|
$ |
3.08 |
|
|
|
2.10 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Phelps Dodge per share information based on post-split number of
shares. See Phelps Dodges audited consolidated financial
statements for year ended December 31, 2005, in particular,
Note 24, incorporated by reference into this proxy
statement. |
|
(2) |
Book value per share is determined at June 30, 2006, and
December 31, 2005, under U.S. GAAP. |
|
(3) |
All periods presented reflect post-split cash dividends per
common share. |
|
(4) |
In accordance with applicable requirements, we have included in
this proxy statement a pro forma balance sheet for the six
months ended June 30, 2006 only, and a calculation of
combined book value for December 31, 2005 is not available. |
|
(5) |
Pro forma cash dividends are based solely on historical
post-split dividends per share for Phelps Dodge. |
|
(6) |
The equivalent Inco amounts are calculated by multiplying the
combined pro forma Phelps Dodge and Inco by an assumed exchange
ratio of 0.672, which represents the exchange ratio that would
have applied if the proposed transaction had been consummated on
July 14, 2006. |
22
COMPARATIVE PER SHARE DIVIDEND INFORMATION
The table below sets forth, for the calendar quarters indicated,
the dividends declared on Phelps Dodge and Inco common shares.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phelps Dodge |
|
Inco |
|
|
Common Shares |
|
Common Shares |
|
|
Dividends(a)(b) |
|
Dividends(c) |
|
|
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$ |
0.2500 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
0.0625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
0.0625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
0.1250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
0.1250 |
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$ |
0.1250 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
0.3125 |
|
|
|
0.100 |
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.100 |
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
2.6875 |
|
|
|
0.100 |
|
2006 (through August 1, 2006)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$ |
2.1875 |
|
|
$ |
0.125 |
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
2.4000 |
|
|
|
0.125 |
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
0.2000 |
|
|
|
0.125 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
All periods presented reflect post-split dividends per common
share. |
|
|
(b) |
|
On June 6, 2006, the Phelps Dodge board declared a dividend
on the Phelps Dodge common shares of $0.20 per share, payable on
September 1, 2006, to Phelps Dodge shareholders of record
as of August 14, 2006. |
|
|
|
(c) |
|
On July 18, 2006, the Inco board declared a quarterly
dividend on the Inco common shares of $0.125 per share, payable
on September 1, 2006, to Inco shareholders of record as of
August 16, 2006. |
|
23
RISK FACTORS
You should carefully consider the following risk factors, as
well as the other information contained in this proxy statement,
in evaluating whether to approve the charter amendment proposal,
the share issuance proposal, the charter amendment adjournment
proposal and the share issuance adjournment proposal. In
particular, we direct your attention to the risk factors and
cautionary statements incorporated by reference into this proxy
statement from public filings made by Phelps Dodge and Inco. See
Where You Can Find More Information and Incorporation By
Reference beginning on page 100 of this proxy
statement.
We may not realize the operating and other synergies, cost
savings and other benefits currently anticipated due to
challenges associated with integrating the operations,
technologies and personnel of Phelps Dodge and Inco.
The success of the combination transaction will be dependent in
large part on the success of the management of the combined
company in integrating the operations, technologies and
personnel of the combined company following the combination
transaction. The failure of the combined company to successfully
integrate the operations of Phelps Dodge with Inco, or otherwise
to realize any of the anticipated benefits of the combination
transaction, could impair the results of operations,
profitability and financial results of the combined company. In
particular, a failure to realize increased earnings, cost
savings and enhanced growth opportunities described elsewhere in
this proxy statement could have a material adverse effect on the
combined companys results of operations.
Realization of the anticipated benefits of the combination will
depend in part on whether our and Incos operations,
systems and personnel can be integrated in an efficient and
effective manner. In addition, realization of these anticipated
benefits may depend, in part, on the timing and manner of
completion of a subsequent acquisition transaction between
Phelps Dodge and Incos shareholders. Moreover, the overall
integration of the companies may result in unanticipated
operations problems, expenses and liabilities and diversion of
managements attention.
As a result of these and other factors, it is possible that the
synergies and cost reductions expected from the combination
transaction will not be realized. In addition, such synergies
assume certain realized long-term metals prices. If actual
prices are below such assumed prices, that could adversely
affect the synergies to be realized.
The value of your shares of Phelps Dodge common stock may be
adversely affected by any inability of the combined company to
achieve the benefits expected to result from the completion of
the combination.
Achieving the benefits of the combination will depend in part
upon meeting the challenges inherent in the successful
combination of business enterprises of the size and scope of
Phelps Dodge and Inco and the possible resulting diversion of
management attention for an extended period of time. There can
be no assurance that we will meet these challenges and that such
diversion will not negatively impact the operations of the
combined company following the combination.
The closing of the combination is conditioned upon, among
other things, the receipt of consents and approvals from
governments that could delay completion of the combination or
impose conditions on the companies that could result in an
adverse effect on the business or financial condition of the
combined company.
Completion of the combination is conditioned upon the expiration
or termination of the applicable waiting period under the HSR
Act, the expiration or termination of the applicable waiting
period under the Council Regulation, receipt of the Competition
Act Approval and receipt of the Investment Canada Act Approval.
The conditions relating to the HSR Act and the Competition Act
Approval have been satisfied. A substantial delay in obtaining
satisfactory approvals or the imposition of unfavorable terms or
conditions in the approvals to be obtained could have an adverse
effect on the business, financial condition or results of
operations of the combined company.
24
Certain jurisdictions throughout the world could claim
jurisdiction under their competition or antitrust laws in
respect of acquisitions or mergers that have the potential to
affect their domestic marketplace. Although we do not currently
anticipate that there will be any investigations or proceedings
in any jurisdiction that would have a material impact on the
completion of the combination or the operations of the combined
company, there can be no assurance that such investigations or
proceedings, whether by governmental authorities or private
parties, will not be initiated and, if initiated, will not have
a material adverse impact on the completion of the combination
or the operations of the combined company.
We may not realize the benefits of the combined
companys growth projects.
As part of its strategy, the combined company will continue
existing efforts and initiate new efforts to develop new copper,
nickel and other projects and will have a larger number of such
projects as a result of the combination. A number of risks and
uncertainties are associated with the development of these types
of projects, including political, regulatory, design,
construction, labor, operating, technical and technological
risks, uncertainties relating to capital and other costs and
financing risks. The failure to successfully develop any of
these initiatives could have a material adverse effect on the
combined companys financial position and results of
operations.
The combined company may not meet key production and other
cost estimates.
A decrease in the amount of, and a change in the timing of the
production outlook for, the metals the combined company will be
producing, in particular copper and nickel, will directly impact
the amount and timing of the combined companys cash flow
from operations. The actual impact of such a decrease on the
combined companys cash flow from operations would depend
on the timing of any changes in production and on actual prices
and costs. Any change in the timing of these projected cash
flows that would occur due to production shortfalls or labor
disruptions would, in turn, result in delays in receipt of such
cash flows and in using such cash to reduce debt levels and may
require additional borrowings to fund capital expenditures,
including capital for the combined companys development
projects, in the future. Any such financing requirements could
adversely effect the combined companys credit ratings and
its ability to access the capital markets in the future to meet
any external financing requirements or increase its debt
financing costs. In addition, a number of these and other
developments or events, including changes in credit terms,
product mix, demand for the combined companys products and
production disruptions, could make historical trends in Phelps
Dodges and Incos cash flows lose their predictive
value.
The level of production and capital and operating cost estimates
relating to growth projects, which are used in establishing
ore/mineral reserve estimates for determining and obtaining
financing and other purposes, are based on certain assumptions
and are inherently subject to significant uncertainties. It is
very likely that actual results for the combined companys
projects will differ from current estimates and assumptions, and
these differences may be material. In addition, experience from
actual mining or processing operations may identify new or
unexpected conditions that could reduce production below, and/or
increase capital and/or operating costs above, current
estimates. If actual results are less favorable than currently
estimated, the combined companys business, results of
operations, financial condition and liquidity could be
materially adversely effected.
The pro forma combined companys indebtedness following
the completion of the combination will be higher than Phelps
Dodges and Incos existing combined indebtedness.
This increased level of indebtedness could adversely affect the
combined company in many ways, including reducing funds
available for other business purposes.
The total combined indebtedness of Phelps Dodge and Inco as of
June 30, 2006, was approximately $3.0 billion. The
combined companys approximate pro forma indebtedness as of
June 30, 2006, after giving effect to a combination of
Phelps Dodge with Inco would have been approximately
$5.1 billion (which would be increased up to approximately
$10.1 billion assuming that Phelps Dodge draws down amounts
under its $5.0 billion unsecured, five-year loan facility
in connection with its share repurchase program). Should any
existing or future third-party bidder offer to purchase Inco, we
may incur additional
25
indebtedness in order to increase the consideration we offer and
pay to Inco shareholders. In addition, the cash consideration
Phelps Dodge has offered to pay to Inco shareholders under the
combination agreement is denominated in Canadian dollars while
Phelps Dodges financing for the combination under its new
credit facilities will be denominated in U.S. dollars. To
the extent that the Canadian dollar appreciates in value against
the U.S. dollar prior to the close of the combination,
Phelps Dodge may need to secure additional debt financing to
cover the increased value of the cash consideration resulting
from any such exchange rate movement if it is unable to
implement effective exchange rate protection measures or
cash-on-hand or other
financing sources are insufficient. As a result of the increase
in debt resulting from either combination transaction, demands
on the combined companys resources would increase after
such transaction. The increased levels of indebtedness could
reduce funds available to the combined company for growth
projects and maintenance of current production and mining
operations or create competitive disadvantages for the combined
company compared with other companies with lower debt levels. In
addition, although we intend to refinance any debt incurred
under the $3.6 billion 12-month credit facility in amounts
then outstanding by accessing the capital markets in one or more
public or private offerings of debt securities at appropriate
times following completion of the combination, there can be no
assurance that we will be able to refinance the debt on
favorable terms or at all. Any such failure to refinance the
debt could have a material adverse impact on the combined
companys results of operations and liquidity.
Up to $6.35 billion of the new debt expected to be incurred
under Phelps Dodges new $10.45 billion credit
facilities will be incurred by Phelps Dodge Canada Inc., or an
affiliated entity, as primary obligor. Debt issued by Phelps
Dodge may be structurally subordinated to creditors of Phelps
Dodge Canada Inc., or any such affiliated entity, with respect
to the assets of Phelps Dodge Canada Inc., or any such
affiliated entity. The resulting structural subordination could
negatively affect Phelps Dodges credit rating, which could
have a material adverse impact on the combined companys
results of operations and liquidity.
Commodity price volatility may reduce the combined
companys cash flow and negatively affect its liquidity.
The combined companys financial performance will be
heavily dependent on commodities prices, in particular copper,
nickel, molybdenum and cobalt, which are affected by many
factors beyond the companys control. The prices of these
commodities, as reported on the exchanges on which they trade,
are influenced significantly by numerous factors, including
(i) the worldwide balance of demand and supply relating to
such commodities, (ii) rates of global economic growth,
trends in industrial production and other economic conditions
that correlate with demand for such commodities,
(iii) economic growth and political conditions in China,
which has become the largest consumer of various commodities in
the world, and other major developing economies,
(iv) speculative investment positions in such commodities
and commodities futures, (v) the availability and cost of
substitute materials, (vi) currency exchange fluctuations,
including the relative strength of the U.S. dollar and
(vii) relative production costs. A sustained period of low
prices for any of these commodities would adversely affect the
combined companys profits and cash flow and could
(i) reduce revenues as a result of production cutbacks due
to curtailment of operations or temporary or permanent closure
of mines or portions of deposits that have become uneconomical
at the then-prevailing prices, (ii) delay or halt
exploration or the development of new process technology or
projects, (iii) reduce funds available for exploration and
the building of ore reserves and (iv) reduce cash available
to service the combined companys indebtedness.
Potential payments made to dissenting Inco shareholders in
respect of their shares could exceed the amount of consideration
otherwise due to them under the terms of the combination
agreement.
Inco is a corporation governed by the Canada Business
Corporations Act, which we refer to as the CBCA. Incos
shareholders will have the right to dissent from the approval of
the arrangement pursuant to which the combination will be
effected. If the shareholders of Inco exercise their right to
dissent in compliance with the CBCA, such dissenting
shareholders will be entitled to be paid the judicially
determined fair value of their shares, which could be higher
than the consideration to which such shareholders would have
been entitled under the combination agreement. As a result,
Phelps Dodge may
26
be required to spend more to acquire Inco, or to pay a greater
proportion of the purchase price in cash, than would have been
the case if all shares were purchased under the combination
agreement. Although we believe that our new credit facilities
will be adequate to fund any such required cash, any such
payments to dissenting shareholders could have a material
adverse effect on the combined companys financial position
and its liquidity.
The combined company may face increased risk associated with
labor relations.
The combined company may have difficulty maintaining positive
relationships with its combined global workforce, and the
historical representation of employees of Phelps Dodge and Inco
by different labor unions in the same country or locale may
increase the possibility of work interruptions or impede its
ability to enter into new collective bargaining agreements on
terms favorable to the combined company. Strikes and other labor
disruptions at any of the combined companys operations or
lengthy work interruptions at the combined companys
existing and future development projects could materially
adversely affect the timing and completion and the cost of any
such project, as well as the combined companys business,
results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.
The issuance of new shares of Phelps Dodge common stock and
the resale of Phelps Dodge stock received in connection with the
combination may cause the market price of Phelps Dodge common
stock to fall.
As of August 24, 2006, Phelps Dodge had
approximately l shares
of common stock outstanding and
approximately l shares
of common stock subject to outstanding options and other rights
to purchase or acquire its shares. Phelps Dodge currently
expects that it will issue approximately 155,290,625 shares
of its common stock in connection with a combination with Inco.
The issuance of these new shares of Phelps Dodge common stock
and the sale of additional shares of common stock that may
become eligible for sale in the public market from time to time
could have the effect of depressing the market price for Phelps
Dodge common stock.
The shareholders of PT Inco could take legal action seeking
to compel the combined company to make a tender offer for the
minority shares of PT Inco for cash, which may increase the debt
of the combined company.
PT Inco, a 60.8% majority owned subsidiary of Inco, is a public
Indonesian company with its shares listed on the Jakarta Stock
Exchange. An Indonesian capital markets regulation targeting
indirect acquisitions requires that, in certain circumstances, a
new controlling party of a public Indonesian company must make a
tender offer to the other shareholders of the company. One of PT
Incos shareholders has publicly claimed that the
combination will result in the creation of a new controlling
party in respect of PT Inco, therefore requiring Phelps
Dodge to make a tender offer for the shares of PT Inco not owned
by Inco. While Inco and Phelps Dodge believe that Phelps Dodge
would not be required to undertake a tender offer under the
terms of the relevant Indonesian capital markets regulation,
shareholders of PT Inco could take legal action to compel such a
tender offer and it is possible that an order to this effect
might be granted. As a result, the combined company could be
required to purchase a portion of the outstanding shares of PT
Inco for cash, which may increase the debt of the combined
company. See Regulatory Matters Related to the
Combination beginning on page 60 of this proxy
statement.
The combined company will be subject to a broad range of
environmental laws and regulations in the jurisdictions in which
it operates and will be exposed to potentially significant
environmental costs and liabilities.
Each of Phelps Dodge and Inco is subject to a broad range of
environmental laws and regulations in each of the jurisdictions
in which it operates. These laws and regulations, as interpreted
by relevant agencies and the courts, impose increasingly
stringent environmental protection standards regarding, among
other things, air emissions, wastewater storage, treatment and
discharges, the use and handling of hazardous or toxic
materials, waste disposal practices, and the remediation of
environmental contamina-
27
tion. The costs of complying with these laws and regulations,
including participation in assessments and remediation of sites,
could be significant. In addition, these standards can create
the risk of substantial environmental liabilities, including
liabilities associated with divested assets and past activities.
Currently, each of Phelps Dodge and Inco is involved in a number
of compliance efforts and legal proceedings concerning
environmental matters. Each of Phelps Dodge and Inco has
established reserves for environmental remediation activities
and liabilities. However, environmental matters cannot be
predicted with certainty, and these amounts may not be adequate,
especially in light of potential changes in environmental
conditions or the discovery of previously unknown environmental
conditions, the risk of governmental orders to carry out
additional compliance on certain sites not initially included in
remediation in progress, and the potential liability of each of
Phelps Dodge and Inco to remediate sites for which provisions
have not been previously established. Such future developments
with respect to Phelps Dodge and Inco could result in increased
environmental costs and liabilities that could have a material
adverse effect on the combined companys financial position
and results of operations.
28
THE COMBINATION
The Companies
Phelps Dodge. Phelps Dodge is one of the worlds
leading producers of copper and molybdenum, and is the
worlds largest producer of molybdenum-based chemicals and
continuous-cast copper rod. PDMC, our mining division, includes
our worldwide, vertically integrated copper operations from
mining through rod production, marketing and sales; molybdenum
operations from mining through conversion to chemical and
metallurgical products, marketing and sales; other mining
operations and investments; and worldwide mineral exploration,
technology and project development programs. PDI, our
manufacturing division, produces engineered wire and cable
products principally for the global energy sector.
Phelps Dodge was incorporated as a business corporation under
the laws of the state of New York in 1885. Phelps Dodges
executive offices are located at One North Central Avenue,
Phoenix, AZ 85004-4414.
Inco. Inco is one of the worlds premier mining and
metals companies and a leading producer of nickel. Inco is also
an important producer of copper, precious metals and cobalt and
a major producer of value-added specialty nickel products. Inco
also produces sulphuric acid and liquid sulphur dioxide as
by-products from its processing operations in Sudbury, Ontario.
Incos business operations consist of three segments,
(i) the finished products segment, which comprises
Incos mining and processing operations in Ontario,
Manitoba and Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada, and refining
operations in the United Kingdom and interests in refining
operations in Japan and other Asian countries, (ii) the
intermediates segment, which comprises Incos mining and
processing operations in Indonesia where
nickel-in-matte, an
intermediate product, is produced and sold primarily into the
Japanese market, and (iii) the development projects
segment, which comprises Incos Goro nickel-cobalt project
under development in the French overseas territorial community
(collectivité territoriale) of New Caledonia, a nickel
processing plant being built in Dalian, China, an expansion of
Incos facilities in Indonesia and the next phase of
development at Incos Voiseys Bay project (consisting
of feasibility work for a nickel processing plant and
underground mine development).
Inco was incorporated in 1916 under the laws of Canada,
succeeding a business established in 1902. In 1979, Inco was
continued by articles of continuance under the Canada Business
Corporations Act and is governed by that Act. Incos
executive offices are located at 145 King Street West,
Suite 1500, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5H 4B7.
The Combination
On June 25, 2006, we agreed to combine our company with
Inco pursuant to the combination agreement. The combination
agreement also provided that if Inco successfully completed the
Falconbridge acquisition prior to the consummation of our
combination with Inco, we would combine our company with both
Inco and Falconbridge. However, on July 28, 2006, Inco
announced that it elected to not extend its bid for Falconbridge
and the support agreement between Inco and Falconbridge was
terminated in accordance with its terms. Therefore, we will
combine our company with Inco only. The combination will be
effected pursuant to the plan of arrangement.
Combination Consideration and Financing
We have agreed to pay 0.672 shares of the common stock of
Phelps Dodge and Cdn.$20.25 (or, at the Inco holders
option, the U.S. dollar equivalent) in cash for each Inco
common share held immediately prior to the consummation of the
combination.
The issuance of the requisite shares of Phelps Dodge common
stock to Incos shareholders requires the approval of
Phelps Dodges shareholders, which is one of the purposes
of the special meeting. Phelps Dodge will finance the cash
component of the Combination Consideration, in part, from its
available cash and with borrowings under the new credit
facilities to be entered into in connection with the combination.
29
The new credit facilities will have aggregate borrowing capacity
of up to $10.45 billion which, together with available cash
from other sources, will be available for the following purposes:
|
|
|
|
|
to finance up to $4.1 billion of the cash
consideration to be paid by us in connection with the
combination; |
|
|
|
to finance our post-combination share repurchase program,
pursuant to which we intend to repurchase up to $5 billion
of our common stock; |
|
|
|
to repurchase or refinance up to $0.4 billion of
Incos indebtedness; |
|
|
|
to refinance liabilities outstanding under our and Incos
existing revolving credit agreements; and |
|
|
|
to fund transaction expenses related to the combination, which
we estimate will be approximately $100 million. |
Credit Facilities. Phelps Dodge has received executed
commitments from Citigroup and HSBC for the entire
$10.45 billion principal amount of the new credit
facilities. The new credit facilities will consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
a $3.6 billion unsecured
12-month multiple draw
term loan facility. The facility will mature at the earlier of
(i) the first anniversary of the closing date under the
facility and (ii) March 31, 2008, and have an interest
rate of, at the borrowers option, a base rate established
by Citibank or LIBOR plus a margin, subject to the combined
companys long-term senior unsecured debt rating. |
|
|
|
a $5.0 billion unsecured
five-year term loan
facility. The facility will be a multi-draw facility with
$3 billion available for drawings by Phelps Dodge and
$2 billion available for drawings by Phelps Dodge Canada,
and the facility will be payable in quarterly installments on an
amortizing basis requiring 0%, 0%, 10%, 15% and 75% of the
indebtedness under the facility to be repaid in the first,
second, third, fourth and fifth year, respectively, following
the funding date with the balance payable on the maturity date.
The facility will have an interest rate of, at the
borrowers option, a base rate established by Citibank or
LIBOR plus a margin, subject to the combined companys
long-term senior unsecured debt rating; |
|
|
|
a $750 million
five-year unsecured
revolving credit facility. The facility will terminate on the
fifth anniversary after the closing date and have an interest
rate of, at the borrowers option, (i) for U.S.$
loans, a base rate established by Citibank or LIBOR plus a
margin and (ii) for Cdn.$ loans, a bankers acceptance
discount rate plus a margin, in each case, subject to the
combined companys long-term senior unsecured debt rating;
and |
|
|
|
a $1.1 billion
five-year unsecured
revolving credit facility. The facility will terminate on the
fifth anniversary after the closing date and have an interest
rate of, at the borrowers option, a base rate established
by Citibank or LIBOR plus a margin, subject, in each case, to
the combined companys long-term senior unsecured debt
rating. |
The primary obligor under each term loan facility (except with
respect to the $3 billion principal amount of the five-year
term facility) and the $750 million revolving credit
facility will be Phelps Dodge Canada Inc. Phelps Dodge and PD
Canada Subco will guarantee Phelps Dodge Canada Inc.s
obligations under such facilities. Phelps Dodge will be the
primary obligor under the $1.1 billion revolving credit
facility and $3 billion of the $5 billion unsecured
five-year term loan facility.
We currently intend to refinance indebtedness incurred under the
12-month term loan facility in amounts then outstanding by
accessing the capital markets in one or more public or private
offerings of debt securities of Phelps Dodge Canada Inc., Amalco
or Phelps Dodge Inco at appropriate times following completion
of the combination.
30
Post-Combination Shareholding, Board of Directors and
Management
We estimate that, upon completion of the combination, former
shareholders of Inco will own approximately 43% of the combined
companys outstanding common shares.
We expect that, upon consummation of the combination of our
company with Inco, J. Steven Whisler, the chairman and
chief executive officer of Phelps Dodge, will be chairman and
chief executive officer of the combined new company;
Scott M. Hand, the chairman and chief executive officer of
Inco, will become the vice chairman of the combined company and
the president of the combined companys nickel division;
Timothy R. Snider, the president and chief operating
officer of Phelps Dodge, will hold the same positions in the
combined company; and Ramiro G. Peru, executive vice
president and chief financial officer of Phelps Dodge, will hold
the same positions in the combined company. We expect
Messrs. Whisler, Snider and Peru to be based in Phoenix and
Mr. Hand to be based in Toronto.
We expect the board of directors of the combined company to be
composed of 15 members, 11 of which will be members of the
current Phelps Dodge board of directors and four of which will
be members of the current boards of Inco.
Background of the Combination
Phelps Dodge regularly reviews, as part of its strategic
planning process, the possibility of selected strategic
acquisitions, divestitures and business combinations with others
in order to enhance shareholder value and its competitive and
financial position. In late 2004 and early 2005, management of
Phelps Dodge and Inco jointly considered a number of options
concerning the possible acquisition of the assets or common
stock of a third company. Among the acquisition structures
considered was a combination of Phelps Dodge and Inco. However,
the parties were unable to agree on a transaction or a basis on
which to proceed with further discussions.
Inco has historically supplied certain products to Phelps Dodge,
and Phelps Dodge and Falconbridge have supplied certain products
to each other in the ordinary course of each companys
respective business. As of the date of this proxy statement,
Phelps Dodge and Falconbridge are parties to an agreement, dated
December 28, 2005, pursuant to which Falconbridge supplies
copper cathodes to Phelps Dodge, and to an agreement, dated
December 13, 2005, pursuant to which Phelps Dodge supplies
smelter reverts to Falconbridge. Phelps Dodge and Inco were
parties to a letter agreement, dated November 29, 2004,
pursuant to which Inco supplied copper cathodes to Phelps Dodge.
The letter agreement expired by its terms on December 31,
2005.
The transaction described in this proxy statement, including the
acquisition by Phelps Dodge of all of the outstanding equity of
Inco (whether following Incos acquisition of Falconbridge
or on a stand-alone basis), was negotiated in the context of
several other proposed transactions involving Inco and
Falconbridge (but not Phelps Dodge). On October 11, 2005,
Inco and Falconbridge jointly announced that Inco had agreed to
make an offer to purchase all of the outstanding common shares
of Falconbridge, for a price of Cdn.$7.50 in cash and 0.524 Inco
common shares for each Falconbridge share, and that Inco and
Falconbridge had entered into a support agreement with respect
to that offer. Incos offer for Falconbridge formally
commenced on October 24, 2005, and had a value of
approximately Cdn.$13.1 billion based on the closing price
of Incos common shares on October 10, 2005. The
support agreement was amended on January 12, 2006 and
February 20, 2006 to extend the date that Incos offer
would remain open, and on March 21, 2006 to reflect
Falconbridges implementation of a new shareholder rights
plan and to amend Incos right to modify its offer.
On May 8, 2006, Teck Cominco Limited announced an
unsolicited offer to purchase all of the outstanding common
stock of Inco, conditional upon Inco not completing its
announced transaction with Falconbridge.
On May 13, 2006, Inco and Falconbridge announced that they
had amended their support agreement to, among other things,
increase the consideration offered by Inco for each common share
of Falconbridge, which now constituted Cdn.$51.17 in cash or a
combination of 0.6927 shares of Inco and $0.05 in cash for
each share
31
of Falconbridge (which had a value of approximately
Cdn.$19.7 billion on the date of announcement) and to
increase the
break-up
fee payable by Falconbridge to Inco in certain
circumstances.
On May 17, 2006, Xstrata plc announced an unsolicited offer
to acquire all of the outstanding common shares of Falconbridge
that Xstrata did not already own, at a price of Cdn.$52.50 in
cash for each Falconbridge common share (which had a value of
approximately Cdn.$20.2 billion on the date of
announcement), and specified that its offer would remain open
until July 7, 2006.
Within a few days thereafter, Mr. Ramiro G. Peru, executive
vice president and chief financial officer of Phelps Dodge,
called a representative of Morgan Stanley, who was acting as one
of Incos financial advisors, and indicated that Phelps
Dodge would be open to discussing how it might assist Inco to
respond to the hostile bid for Inco made by Teck Cominco and the
competing bid for Falconbridge made by Xstrata.
On May 26, 2006, a representative of Morgan Stanley called
Mr. Peru and told him that Inco was interested in talking
to Phelps Dodge concerning the possibility that Phelps Dodge
could assist Inco in enhancing the financial terms of
Incos offer for Falconbridge or make a more attractive bid
for Inco than Teck Cominco, and more generally regarding the
possibility of a three-way combination of Phelps Dodge, Inco and
Falconbridge.
On May 27, 2006, Mr. J. Steven Whisler, chairman and
chief executive officer of Phelps Dodge, telephoned
Mr. Scott M. Hand, chairman and chief executive officer of
Inco. Mr. Hand invited Mr. Whisler and representatives
of Phelps Dodge to meet with Inco in Toronto, Canada on
June 2, 2006. At the same time, Phelps Dodge began to
review publicly-available information regarding Inco and
Falconbridge, assemble due diligence teams and plan its due
diligence strategy.
On May 31, 2006, Inco filed a Directors Circular and a
Schedule 14D-9 recommending that the Inco shareholders
reject the unsolicited Teck Cominco bid on the grounds that,
among other things, the consideration being offered by Teck
Cominco was inadequate.
On June 2, 2006, representatives of Inco and Phelps Dodge,
and their respective financial and legal advisors, met in
Toronto to discuss the parties respective businesses and
the possibility of a transaction. At this meeting,
representatives of Inco emphasized that they believed that, in
light of the July 7, 2006, expiration date of the Xstrata
bid for Falconbridge and the hearing on the Falconbridge
shareholder rights plan scheduled for June 27, 2006, before
the Ontario Securities Commission, to be competitive Phelps
Dodge would need to complete its due diligence and be in a
position to enter into definitive agreements with respect to a
transaction by no later than Monday, June 26, 2006.
On June 4, 2006, the financial and legal advisors of each
of Phelps Dodge and Inco spoke by telephone regarding the
various ways in which a transaction between Phelps Dodge and
Inco might be structured, including in particular the
possibility that Phelps Dodge would acquire all of the
outstanding common equity of Inco. On this call, the financial
advisors for Inco also requested that Phelps Dodge consider how
it could provide support to Inco to allow it to increase the
cash component of its bid for Falconbridge.
Also on June 4, 2006, Inco executed a confidentiality
agreement in favor of Phelps Dodge, and on June 5, Phelps
Dodge executed a similar agreement in favor of Inco. Also on
June 5, 2006, Inco filed an amendment to its
Schedule 14D-9 stating that it had commenced negotiations
in response to the Teck Cominco offer concerning a potential
merger, amalgamation or other form of strategic transaction on a
basis consistent with its obligations under its support
agreement with Falconbridge, and had entered into customary
arrangements relating to confidentiality and standstill
obligations in exchange for being provided with confidential
information.
On June 6, 2006, Phelps Dodge formally engaged Citigroup
and HSBC as its financial advisors in connection with the
transaction. Phelps Dodge selected Citigroup and HSBC as
financial advisors based on their qualifications, experience and
reputation, their familiarity with Phelps Dodge and its business
and the significance of the proposed transaction for Phelps
Dodge.
32
On June 7, 2006, in connection with a regularly scheduled
board meeting, the Phelps Dodge board of directors discussed the
possibility of a transaction involving Inco and Falconbridge.
Representatives of Citigroup and HSBC attended this meeting as
did representatives of Debevoise & Plimpton LLP, the
companys regular outside legal counsel. Citigroup and HSBC
provided their preliminary perspectives with respect to a
possible combination of Phelps Dodge with Inco and Falconbridge
or with Inco only. Citigroup and HSBC also discussed alternate
forms of consideration that could be offered to Incos
shareholders in such a combination with Phelps Dodge as well as
certain implications of these alternatives. At this June 7,
2006 meeting, the board of directors authorized senior
management of Phelps Dodge to pursue discussions with Inco and
Falconbridge regarding a possible combination.
On June 8, 2006, Phelps Dodge began a customary due
diligence review of Inco, including of certain non-public
information provided in an electronic data room. From June 8
through June 25, 2006, being the date that definitive
transaction documents were signed, Phelps Dodge and its advisors
continued to conduct due diligence regarding Inco and its
business, including reviewing public and non-public documents,
meeting with various members of Inco management, and visiting
Inco facilities in Canada, Indonesia, New Caledonia and
elsewhere. At the same time, Phelps Dodge made available to Inco
an electronic data room and held various meetings with
representatives of Inco in connection with Incos due
diligence review of Phelps Dodge.
On June 9, 2006, Mr. Whisler telephoned Mr. Hand
to advise him that the Phelps Dodge board of directors had
authorized Phelps Dodge to continue discussions with respect to
a possible transaction among Phelps Dodge, Inco and
Falconbridge. Messrs. Whisler and Hand discussed various
timing issues with respect to the possible transaction and
agreed to meet in New York on June 14, 2006.
On June 12, 2006, Phelps Dodge and Falconbridge each
executed confidentiality agreements in favor of the other and
Phelps Dodge received access to Falconbridges electronic
data room for the purposes of conducting due diligence. From
June 12 to and including the date that definitive
transaction documents were signed, Phelps Dodge conducted a due
diligence review of public and non-public materials provided by
Falconbridge, met with certain members of Falconbridge
management and visited various Falconbridge facilities located
in Canada, South America and elsewhere.
Also on June 12, 2006, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP,
counsel to affiliates of Citigroup and HSBC as potential lenders
to Phelps Dodge, circulated the first draft of the commitment
papers pursuant to which Citigroup and HSBC would commit to
provide financing for the transaction. Various drafts of the
commitment papers were subsequently exchanged until the date
that definitive transaction documents were signed on
June 25, 2006.
On June 14, 2006, Phelps Dodge management met in New York with
the companys legal and financial advisors to discuss the
structure and terms of a possible offer by Phelps Dodge to
acquire Inco and the terms on which Incos offer to acquire
Falconbridge might be increased. Also on June 14, 2006, the
financial advisors of Phelps Dodge spoke by telephone with the
financial advisors of Inco regarding the structure and terms of
any financing that Phelps Dodge might be willing to provide to
Inco to assist it in increasing its offer for Falconbridge,
following which Phelps Dodges legal and financial advisors
sent a term sheet for a proposed issuance of new convertible
preferred stock of Inco.
On the evening of June 14, 2006, Messrs. Whisler and
Hand met in New York to discuss the status of the proposed
transaction and certain non-economic issues, including the
proposed name of the combined company, management composition,
board size and related matters.
On June 15, the Phelps Dodge board of directors met
telephonically to discuss the status of the proposed
transaction. At this meeting, management provided the board with
an update of its due diligence investigation of Inco and
Falconbridge, and Mr. Whisler reported on his meeting with
Mr. Hand. The companys financial advisors updated the
board on their prior presentations with respect to a potential
business combination involving Inco and Falconbridge and the
companys legal advisors discussed with the board the terms
of a draft combination agreement for the proposed transaction.
33
Following the Phelps Dodge board meeting, the companys
legal advisors sent to Incos legal advisors,
Sullivan & Cromwell LLP and Osler, Hoskin &
Harcourt LLP, a draft of a combination agreement for the
proposed transaction. The draft agreement did not include
pricing terms but focused on the structure of the transaction,
providing for the acquisition by Phelps Dodge of all of the
outstanding common equity of Inco by means of a Canadian plan of
arrangement, and set forth customary representations,
warranties, covenants (including non-solicitation and
fiduciary out provisions), closing conditions and
termination rights and remedies.
On the evening of June 15, Mr. Whisler met with
Mr. Derek G. Pannell, the chief executive officer of
Falconbridge, to discuss in general terms the proposed
combination of Phelps Dodge with both Inco and Falconbridge.
On June 17, 2006, the Phelps Dodge board of directors met
by teleconference with its legal and financial advisors to
discuss the status of the proposed transaction. On this call,
representatives of Phelps Dodge updated the board as to the
companys due diligence investigation of Inco and
Falconbridge and the anticipated synergies that could be
realized in such a transaction. Phelps Dodges financial
advisors, Citigroup and HSBC, reviewed the bids of Inco for
Falconbridge, Xstrata for Falconbridge and Teck Cominco for
Inco, and discussed with the board and Phelps Dodges other
advisors alternative bidding approaches for a combination with
both Inco and Falconbridge, and with Inco on a stand-alone
basis. Citigroup and HSBC also updated their prior presentation
of June 7 and addressed various matters relating to a potential
business combination of Phelps Dodge with both Inco and
Falconbridge or with Inco only. At the meeting, the board
authorized Phelps Dodge senior management to continue
discussions with Inco and Falconbridge, and authorized
Mr. Whisler to submit a formal proposal to Inco.
Also on June 17, 2006, Mr. Whisler submitted
electronically to Mr. Hand a letter setting forth the terms
on which Phelps Dodge would be willing to acquire Inco. The
letter proposed that Phelps Dodge acquire all the outstanding
common equity of Inco in exchange for Cdn.$11.50 in cash and
0.695 shares of Phelps Dodge common stock for each
outstanding common share of Inco. Based on the closing price of
Phelps Dodges common stock on Friday, June 16, 2006,
this implied a price of Cdn.$74.00 for each common share of
Inco, representing a premium of approximately 11 percent to
Incos closing stock price on June 16, 2006 and
8 percent to the value of the Teck Cominco offer to acquire
Inco. The proposal letter observed that the stock portion of the
offer would allow Inco shareholders to participate in the value
of the synergies, cost savings, increased scale and financial
and market potential of the combined company going forward,
including that the increased capitalization of the combined
company could make the stock of the combined company
increasingly attractive to index funds. The letter also stated
that the transaction between Inco and Phelps Dodge would not be
conditioned on the completion of Incos acquisition of
Falconbridge.
Phelps Dodges letter to Inco also suggested that Inco
should increase the implied value of its offer for Falconbridge
to between Cdn.$58.00 to Cdn.$60.00. In this connection, Phelps
Dodge indicated that it would be willing to purchase between
$3.0 billion and $3.5 billion of a new class of Inco
convertible preferred stock to assist Inco, if necessary, in
raising its bid for Falconbridge. The letter further stated that
Phelps Dodge was analyzing a $5.0 billion stock repurchase
program, a portion of which could be reserved to fund any cash
payment required to be made to Inco or Falconbridge shareholders
who exercised dissenters rights in connection with the proposed
transaction. The repurchase program, the letter stated, could
also be used to return capital to Phelps Dodge shareholders. The
Phelps Dodge letter also proposed that the combined company
would be named Phelps Dodge Inco Corporation, its board would
include prominent Canadian directors, the company would maintain
the headquarters of the nickel division in Toronto and that its
securities would be listed on both the New York Stock Exchange
and the Toronto Stock Exchange.
After sending this letter to Mr. Hand, Mr. Whisler
called Mr. Pannell and advised him that Phelps Dodge had
made a proposal to Inco that was designed, among other things,
to enable Inco to enhance the financial terms of its proposed
acquisition of Falconbridge, although he did not discuss with
Mr. Pannell the economic terms of the transaction proposed
by Phelps Dodge to Inco.
34
On June 18, 2006, Mr. Hand and Mr. Whisler spoke
by telephone regarding the Phelps Dodge proposal letter and the
draft combination agreement. Mr. Hand noted that the Inco
board of directors planned to meet that evening and would
consider in more detail the Phelps Dodge proposal and
Incos other options at that time.
On June 19, Mr. Hand spoke by telephone with
Mr. Whisler and indicated that Incos principal
concern with respect to the Phelps Dodge offer was valuation.
The parties discussed in general terms the possibility of
adjusting the
cash-to-stock ratio and
agreed that their counsel could begin to negotiate definitive
documents, which negotiations commenced the following day and
continued until definitive transaction documents were executed
on June 25, 2006. Mr. Hand indicated that the Inco
board would meet on Wednesday, June 21, to further consider the
Phelps Dodge offer.
Following the June 21, 2006, meeting of the Inco board of
directors, Mr. Hand called Mr. Whisler and informed
him that the Inco board had requested that Phelps Dodge improve
its per share offer to a level of Cdn.$17.50 in cash and
0.750 shares of Phelps Dodge common stock. Mr. Hand
indicated that Inco would be willing to increase its per share
offer for Falconbridge by Cdn.$5.00 in cash (keeping the
exchange ratio for the stock component unchanged).
Mr. Whisler told Mr. Hand that the Phelps Dodge board
would meet on June 22 and would consider Incos proposal at
that time.
On June 22, 2006, the Phelps Dodge board and its legal and
financial advisors met telephonically. The companys
financial advisors summarized the current proposals for the
Phelps Dodge purchase of Inco and Falconbridge and updated their
prior presentations to the board with respect to the proposed
transaction. This update included a discussion of the current
bid and ask prices for the proposed Phelps Dodge purchase of
Inco and Falconbridge and a review of the implications of the
proposed stock repurchase program and various financing
alternatives. After discussion, the board authorized
Mr. Whisler to make a revised proposal to Mr. Hand at
a price per Inco share of Cdn.$17.50 in cash and
0.672 shares of Phelps Dodge common stock (which
corresponded to a total value of Cdn.$78.00 based on that
days closing prices).
Following the Phelps Dodge board meeting, Mr. Whisler
called Mr. Hand to communicate the revised Phelps Dodge
offer. In addition to indicating the proposed exchange ratio and
cash payment for Inco common shares, Mr. Whisler emphasized
that the parties commitment should be firm and proposed
termination fees for each company equal to 4 percent of
their respective equity market capitalizations. Mr. Whisler
did not include any Phelps Dodge financing commitment as part of
this revised proposal.
The Inco board of directors met on June 23, 2006, following
which Mr. Hand called Mr. Whisler to discuss the
Phelps Dodge proposal. Mr. Hand made a counterproposal of
0.6817 Phelps Dodge shares and Cdn.$17.50 in cash for each Inco
share. In addition, Mr. Hand stated that the Inco board
thought the termination fees should be approximately
2.5 percent of the parties respective market
capitalizations. Mr. Hand also said that the Inco board
wanted Phelps Dodge to commit to provide financing to Inco
through Phelps Dodges purchase of a convertible
subordinated note in an aggregate principal amount in the range
of $3 billion to $3.5 billion, which could be drawn on
in connection with Incos bid for Falconbridge.
Later on June 23, after discussing the matter with Phelps
Dodges financial and legal advisors, Mr. Whisler
called Mr. Hand and informed him that Phelps Dodge
continued to believe that an exchange ratio of 0.672 shares
of Phelps Dodge common stock for each non-dissenting Inco common
share was appropriate. Mr. Whisler said that he would be
willing to consider termination fees in the range of
3 percent of each companys respective market
capitalization, and that he would discuss with the Phelps Dodge
board of directors the possibility of providing convertible
subordinated debt financing to Inco in an aggregate principal
amount of up to $1 billion. Mr. Hand indicated that he
believed that the Inco board would require a stronger financing
commitment from Phelps Dodge and both Mr. Hand and
Mr. Whisler said that they would discuss these matters
further with their respective boards of directors.
On June 24, 2006, Messrs. Whisler and Peru held a
telephone conference with Mr. Hand and a representative of
Morgan Stanley. After discussion of the possible terms of a
transaction, including Mr. Hands indicating again
that Inco wanted Phelps Dodge to commit to purchase up to an
aggregate of
35
$3.5 billion of Incos convertible subordinated notes,
Mr. Whisler said that he was prepared to present to the
Phelps Dodge board of directors a combination including the
following terms: a price per Inco share of Cdn.$17.50 in cash
plus 0.672 shares of Phelps Dodge common stock, which
corresponded to Cdn.$80.13 per Inco share based on the
closing price of the Phelps Dodge stock on June 23, 2006; a
commitment of Phelps Dodge to purchase convertible subordinated
notes of Inco in an aggregate amount of up to $3 billion;
and termination fees payable by Inco and Phelps Dodge under
certain circumstances of approximately 3 percent of each
companys respective equity market capitalization.
Mr. Whisler also noted that this offer, together with the
Cdn.$5.00 per share increase in the cash portion of
Incos bid for Falconbridge that the parties had previously
discussed, together with an increase in the share exchange ratio
in such bid from 0.524 to 0.55676, would result in an implied
value per Falconbridge share of Cdn.$62.11. Mr. Hand
indicated that, subject to the approval of these terms by the
Phelps Dodge board of directors, and the negotiation and
execution of definitive transaction documents, he would
recommend these terms to the Inco board of directors.
The board of directors of Phelps Dodge met on the morning of
June 25, 2006. At this meeting, Phelps Dodges senior
management briefed the board on the results of the
companys due diligence investigation of Inco and
Falconbridge, Debevoise & Plimpton LLP, the
companys regular outside legal counsel, discussed with the
board their fiduciary duties, Debevoise & Plimpton LLP
and Heenan Blaikie LLP, the companys Canadian legal
counsel, briefed the board on the terms of the transaction
documents, and Citigroup and HSBC discussed with the board the
financial implications of the proposed transaction. In that
connection, Citigroup and HSBC each delivered to the board of
directors an oral opinion, subsequently confirmed in writing,
that as of June 25, 2006, and based upon and subject to the
factors, assumptions, procedures, limitations and qualifications
set forth therein, combination consideration of Cdn.$17.50 in
cash plus 0.672 shares of Phelps Dodge common stock per Inco
share was fair, from a financial point of view, to Phelps Dodge.
During the course of Citigroups and HSBCs
presentation and rendering of their respective opinions,
representatives of Citigroup and HSBC responded to questions
from members of the board of directors confirming or clarifying
their understanding of the analyses performed by Citigroup and
HSBC and the respective opinions rendered by Citigroup and HSBC.
Later on June 25, each of Inco and Falconbridge informed
Phelps Dodge that their respective boards of directors had met
and had approved the terms of the transaction. During the
afternoon and evening of June 25, the parties and their
legal advisors finalized the combination agreement between
Phelps Dodge and Inco, an amendment to the support agreement
between Inco and Falconbridge, and the other definitive
transaction documents, including commitments from Citigroup and
HSBC to provide financing for the transaction. The definitive
agreements were executed by the parties that evening and the
transaction was announced on the morning of June 26, 2006.
On July 7, 2006, Xstrata announced that it had extended the
expiration of its offer to acquire all of the outstanding shares
of Falconbridge that it did not already own from July 7,
2006 to July 21, 2006, although it did not change the
economic terms of that offer.
On July 11, 2006, Xstrata announced that it had increased
the amount of its offer for Falconbridge from Cdn.$52.50 in cash
to Cdn.$59.00 in cash per share, and that it had reduced the
minimum condition that its offer be accepted by at least
662/3 percent
of the outstanding Falconbridge shares to a condition that the
offer be accepted by a majority of the approximately
80.2 percent of the outstanding Falconbridge shares that
Xstrata did not already own. Xstrata specified that its revised
offer would remain open until July 21, 2006.
During the period from July 12 through July 15, senior
management of Phelps Dodge, Inco and Falconbridge discussed
potential changes to the terms of the combination agreement and
of Incos offer for Falconbridge in response to the
increase in the consideration being offered in the Xstrata bid
for Falconbridge. In particular, on July 14, Phelps Dodge
and Inco discussed increasing the consideration payable by
Phelps Dodge to the Inco shareholders from Cdn.$17.50 in cash
and 0.672 of a Phelps Dodge Share to Cdn.$20.25 in cash and
0.672 of a Phelps Dodge Share. The parties also discussed, among
other things, increasing the cash consideration payable under
Incos offer for Falconbridge from Cdn.$17.50 and 0.55676
of an Inco Share to Cdn.$18.50 and 0.55676 of an Inco Share, and
replacing the condition that
36
the Inco offer be accepted by at least
662/3 percent
of the outstanding Falconbridge shares with a condition that the
offer shall have received acceptances from the holders of at
least 50.01 percent of the Falconbridge shares (in each
case calculated on a fully diluted basis). Contemporaneously,
Inco and Falconbridge discussed the possibility of amending
their support agreement to permit Falconbridge to declare a
special dividend of Cdn.$0.75 per Falconbridge share payable to
holders of Falconbridge shares of record on July 26, 2006,
and to permit Inco to acquire up to 5 percent of the
Falconbridge shares through open market purchases.
The Phelps Dodge board of directors met on July 15, 2006.
At this meeting, Phelps Dodges senior management briefed
the Board on the results of the negotiations with Inco and
Falconbridge. Debevoise & Plimpton LLP discussed with the
board their fiduciary duties and briefed the board on the
proposed revisions to the transaction documents, and Citigroup
and HSBC discussed with the board the financial implications of
the proposed revisions to the terms of the transaction.
The Phelps Dodge board of directors met on July 16, 2006.
At this meeting, Citigroup and HSBC each delivered to the board
an oral opinion, subsequently confirmed in writing, that as of
July 16, 2006, and based upon and subject to the factors,
assumptions, procedures, limitations and qualifications set
forth therein, the Combination Consideration was fair, from a
financial point of view, to Phelps Dodge. During the course of
Citigroups and HSBCs presentation and rendering of
their respective opinions, representatives of Citigroup and HSBC
responded to questions from members of the board confirming or
clarifying their understanding of the analyses performed by
Citigroup and HSBC and the respective opinions rendered by
Citigroup and HSBC, as described in more detail under The
Combination Opinions of Phelps Dodges
Financial Advisors beginning on page 42 of this proxy
statement. The full text of the written opinions of Citigroup
and HSBC, each dated July 16, 2006, are attached as
Annexes C and D to this proxy statement and set forth
assumptions made, general procedures followed, factors
considered and limitation and qualifications on the review
undertaken by each of Citigroup and HSBC in connection with
their respective opinions.
Later on July 16, 2006, management of Phelps Dodge and
management of Inco informed each other that their respective
boards of directors had met and had approved the revised terms
of the transaction and management of Phelps Dodge and management
of Inco informed Falconbridge management of such approvals.
During the afternoon and evening of July 16, the parties
and their legal advisors finalized a waiver and amendment to the
combination agreement between Phelps Dodge and Inco and an
amendment to the support agreement between Inco and Falconbridge.
Also, on July 16, 2006, the Falconbridge board of directors
met and unanimously determined to support Incos revised
offer and declared a special dividend in the amount of Cdn.$0.75
payable to Falconbridge shareholders of record as at the close
of business on July 26, 2006, with a payment date of
August 10, 2006.
The definitive agreements were executed by the parties later
that day and the revised transaction terms were announced on
July 16, 2006.
On July 19, 2006, Xstrata announced that it had increased
its offer to acquire all of the outstanding Falconbridge shares
not already owned by Xstrata from Cdn.$59.00 in cash to
Cdn.$62.50 in cash per Falconbridge share. Xstrata also
announced that it had varied its offer to remove the condition
that the Xstrata offer shall have received acceptances from the
holders of at least a majority of the Falconbridge shares. The
revised Xstrata offer was set to expire on August 14, 2006.
On July 20, 2006, Inco announced that its shareholder
rights plan will cease to apply after 4:30 p.m. (Toronto time)
on August 16, 2006. On July 21, 2006, Teck Cominco
announced that it had extended the expiry date of its offer to
acquire all of the outstanding shares of Inco until 8:00 p.m.
(Toronto time) on August 16, 2006.
On July 28, 2006, Inco announced that its tender offer to
acquire all of the outstanding common shares of Falconbridge had
expired at midnight (Vancouver time) on July 27, 2006, and
that the minimum tender condition of 50.01 per cent of the
outstanding Falconbridge common shares had not been satisfied,
and that as a result Inco had elected to terminate its offer. On
the same day, Inco and
37
Falconbridge announced that their support agreement had been
terminated. As a result of such termination, Falconbridge became
obligated to pay $150 million to Inco, with a further
$300 million being payable in the event that Xstratas
offer for Falconbridge is consummated.
Also on July 28, 2006, Phelps Dodge and Inco announced that
they would now focus on the completion of the two-way
combination of Phelps Dodge and Inco.
On July 31, 2006, Teck Cominco announced that it intended
to increase the consideration payable to Inco shareholders under
its original offer announced on May 8, 2006 from Cdn.$78.50
in cash, or 0.9776 of a Teck Cominco Class B subordinate
voting share plus Cdn.$0.05 in cash, for each Inco share to
Cdn.$82.50 in cash, or 1.1293 Teck Cominco Class B
subordinate voting shares plus Cdn.$0.05 in cash, for each Inco
share. Teck Cominco also increased the maximum amount of cash
consideration available under such offer from approximately
Cdn.$6.37 billion to Cdn.$9.1 billion, while reducing
the maximum amount of share consideration to 132.3 million
Class B subordinate voting shares. Teck Cominco specified
that its offer would remain open until August 16, 2006.
On August 6, 2006, Inco filed a Directors Circular and a
Schedule 14D-9 indicating that its board of directors had
determined that the revised Teck Cominco offer was not a
superior proposal for purposes of the combination
agreement, and unanimously recommended that the Inco
shareholders reject the revised Teck Cominco offer. However, the
Inco board also determined that the revised Teck Cominco offer
could reasonably be expected to result in a superior
proposal for purposes of the combination agreement, and
accordingly authorized senior management of Inco and its
advisors to engage in discussions and negotiations with Teck
Cominco. On August 8, 2006, Teck Cominco announced that it
would not enter into discussions or negotiations with Inco
regarding Teck Comincos revised offer.
On August 11, 2006, Companhia Vale do Rio Doce, or CVRD,
announced an unsolicited offer to acquire all of the outstanding
common shares of Inco at a price of Cdn.$86.00 in cash for each
Inco common share (which had a value of approximately
Cdn.$17 billion on the date of announcement), and specified
that its offer would remain open until September 28, 2006.
CVRD stated that completion of its offer was subject to a
sufficient number of shares being tendered to the offer such
that CVRD would own at least
662/3%
of Incos common shares, on a fully-diluted basis,
following completion of the offer, the receipt of all necessary
regulatory approvals, the absence of litigation, no material
adverse change at Inco and other customary conditions. On
August 14, 2006, CVRD formally launched its offer by
publishing an advertisement containing a brief summary of the
offer and by filing offer documents in the United States and
Canada.
On August 15, 2006, Inco filed a Directors Circular and a
Schedule 14D-9 stating that Incos board of directors
had reviewed the CVRD offer and had not concluded that it was a
superior proposal for purposes of the combination
agreement. Accordingly, the Inco board of directors continued to
recommend that the Inco shareholders vote in favor of the
proposed combination between Inco and Phelps Dodge. However,
Incos board of directors did determine that the CVRD offer
could reasonably be expected to result in a superior
proposal for purposes of the combination agreement, and
authorized senior management of Inco and its advisors to engage
in discussions and negotiations with CVRD. Inco further stated
that since the CVRD offer remains open for acceptance until
September 28, 2006 and is subject to a number of
conditions, there was no necessity for Inco shareholders to take
any action with respect to the CVRD Offer at that time and the
Inco board of directors determined for the time being to remain
neutral and to make no recommendation to Inco shareholders in
respect of the CVRD offer. Also on August 15, 2006, Teck
Cominco announced its intention to amend its cash and share
offer to acquire all of the outstanding shares of Inco to
provide for consideration with an aggregate value of C$89.00 per
Inco share, subject to its having completed an offering of its
Class B subordinate voting shares in an amount not less
than Cdn.$5.725 billion. However, on August 16, 2006,
Teck Cominco announced that its proposed equity offering would
not proceed and accordingly that that it would not be amending
its outstanding offer to acquire all of the outstanding common
shares of Inco as announced on August 15, 2006.
On August 17, 2006, Teck Cominco announced that its offer
to acquire all of the outstanding common shares of Inco expired
at midnight on August 16, 2006 and, at the time of expiry,
the offers
38
minimum tender condition of
662/3%
of Inco common shares had not been satisfied. Accordingly, the
Teck Cominco offer was terminated.
Phelps Dodges Reasons for the Combination
In reaching its conclusion to unanimously approve a combination
of Phelps Dodge with Inco, and unanimously recommend that Phelps
Dodge shareholders vote FOR approval of the
charter amendment proposal and FOR the share
issuance proposal, the Phelps Dodge board of directors
considered a number of factors.
|
|
|
Combination of Phelps Dodge with Inco: |
The Phelps Dodge board of directors believes that a combination
of Phelps Dodge with Inco would create a combined company with a
portfolio of world-class assets with the scope, scale and
financial strength to more efficiently develop existing
opportunities and assets and to capitalize quickly on new growth
and other opportunities within the mining industry.
|
|
|
Global Industry Leader With High-Quality, Long-Lived
Assets |
The board believes that the combination would result in the
creation of an industry-leading, diversified metals and mining
company with leading market positions in multiple commodities.
Based on 2005 production for Phelps Dodge and Inco, the combined
company would be:
|
|
|
|
|
the worlds second-largest nickel producer at 487 million
pounds; |
|
|
|
the worlds third-largest copper producer at 2.4 billion
pounds; |
|
|
|
the worlds second-largest producer of molybdenum at 62
million pounds; and |
|
|
|
a major cobalt producer at 4 million pounds. |
The combined companys nickel and copper portfolio would
consist primarily of high-quality, low-cost operations with
significant estimated long-lived mineral/ore reserves and
resources. Based on 2005 sales, the combined company will have
among the highest percentage of its sales derived from base
metals of any of the global metals and mining companies.
|
|
|
Commodity and Asset Diversification |
The board expects the size and diversity of the combined
companys commodity portfolio and mining and production
sites to reduce risks associated with price fluctuations for any
particular commodity and with variations in production costs
associated with any particular mining or production site.
|
|
|
|
|
With its leading positions in nickel, copper, molybdenum and
cobalt, the combined company should benefit from significantly
enhanced commodity diversification. |
|
|
|
The board believes that Inco has relatively low cost positions
in its commodities, which the board believes will allow the
combined company to better weather any future downturns in
commodity prices. |
|
|
|
Based on 2005 revenue figures, approximately 53%, 29% and
15% of the combined companys revenue would be derived
from copper, nickel and molybdenum, respectively. Phelps Dodge
currently derives approximately 77% of its revenues from copper
production. |
|
|
|
The board believes that the combined companys numerous
mines will reduce production disruption risks. |
The board expects the size and scale of the combined
companys financial resources to reduce risks associated
with political or economic instability or natural disasters, in
any particular geographical locale.
39
|
|
|
|
|
Based on 2005 revenue, approximately 64% of the combined
companys revenue would derive from operations in North
America and Europe. |
|
|
|
An additional 17% would be derived from operations in Latin
America (primarily Chile). |
|
|
|
Greater Opportunities for Growth |
The combined company will have a broad portfolio of brownfield
and greenfield growth projects, primarily in nickel, copper,
molybdenum and cobalt available for development. The board
believes that the combined company will have greater flexibility
and financial resources to pursue organic and acquisition growth
opportunities than would Phelps Dodge alone.
|
|
|
Synergies and Cost Savings |
Phelps Dodge has a strong track record of delivering on synergy
expectations based on previous acquisition experience. The board
believes that the combined company will realize from the
combination approximately $215 million in estimated annual
synergies within two years following the closing of the
combination. The board believes there is additional potential
for increased synergies in the mid to long term. The synergies
the board believes the combined company will realize include:
|
|
|
|
|
benefits from exploration synergies resulting from prioritizing
exploration efforts, including prioritizing and reducing overall
exploration spending; |
|
|
|
general and administrative savings resulting from consolidating
various functions and eliminating duplicative activities and
costs, including establishing one corporate headquarters in
Phoenix, Arizona and the head of the combined companys
nickel operations in Toronto, Canada; and |
|
|
|
benefits from general operating improvements and from economies
of scale in purchasing, operating supplies and capital equipment
and technology management. |
|
|
|
Greater Financial Strength |
Phelps Dodge believes that the increased size, asset
diversification and expected synergies and cost savings of the
combined company will lead to significantly enhanced financial
strength and flexibility, including as a result of:
|
|
|
|
|
the companys expectation that the transaction will be
immediately accretive to cash flow; |
|
|
|
the companys expectation that the transaction will be
accretive to earnings per share beginning in 2008; |
|
|
|
greater ability to fund future acquisitions and capital return
programs; and |
|
|
|
the companys expectation that the diversification in its
asset base and lower relative cost position, together with its
greater size, will result in improvements in its overall cost of
capital. |
|
|
|
Increased Market Liquidity |
The combined company would have a meaningfully enhanced position
in the S&P 500 Index. As a result, the board believes
that Phelps Dodge investors will benefit from enhanced trading
volume of the combined companys stock and a broader
shareholder base, including greater appeal to institutional
investors and indexed funds. In addition, the board believes
that the projected position of the combined company as a North
America-based global industry leader with diverse, high-quality,
long-lived assets and broad growth potential could positively
affect the combined companys valuation multiple as
compared with Phelps Dodges current valuation multiple.
The combined company will have what the board believes is an
outstanding management team. The potential members of the new
management team have proven themselves to be highly skilled in
operations,
40
technology and financial management, and most of new management
will have spent their entire careers working in the mining
industry. The board believes that the members of the new
management team have the skills necessary to manage the combined
company through the most significant challenges that our
industry may face and create value for Phelps Dodge shareholders.
|
|
|
Other Factors Considered by the Phelps Dodge Board of
Directors |
Other factors the board considered in reaching its conclusion to
unanimously approve a combination of our company with Inco and
unanimously recommend that Phelps Dodge shareholders
vote FOR approval of the charter amendment
proposal and FOR the share issuance proposal,
include:
|
|
|
|
|
the information concerning Phelps Dodges and Incos
respective historical businesses and financial results and
prospects, including the results of Phelps Dodges due
diligence investigation of Inco; |
|
|
|
Phelps Dodges managements assessment that it can,
working with Incos managers and employees, effectively and
efficiently integrate the two companies; and |
|
|
|
the opinions of Phelps Dodges financial advisors,
Citigroup and HSBC, that, as of July 16, 2006, and based on
and subject to the factors, assumptions procedures, limitations
and considerations in their respective opinions, the Combination
Consideration was fair, from a financial point of view, to
Phelps Dodge. The full text of the written opinions of Citigroup
and HSBC, each dated July 16, 2006, are attached as
Annexes C and D to this proxy statement and set forth
assumptions made, general procedures followed, factors
considered and limitations and qualifications on the review
undertaken by each of Citigroup and HSBC in connection with
their respective opinions. |
|
|
|
Potential Risks Considered by the Phelps Dodge Board of
Directors |
|
|
|
|
|
The risks of integrating the operations of businesses the size
of Phelps Dodge and Inco, including that integration costs may
be greater, and that cost savings, growth prospects and other
synergies may be lower, than anticipated by Phelps Dodges
board of directors. |
|
|
|
The risk that regulatory agencies may not approve the
combination or may impose terms and conditions on their
approvals that adversely affect the projected financial results
of the combined company. |
|
|
|
Risks, associated with the combined companys greater
indebtedness when compared to Phelps Dodges and
Incos outstanding pre-combination total indebtedness. |
|
|
|
Other risks discussed more fully under Risk Factors
beginning on page 24 of this proxy statement. |
The board recognized that there can be no assurance about future
results, including results expected or considered in the factors
listed above in respect of either potential combination. The
board of directors unanimously concluded, however, that the
potential advantages of both potential combinations outweighed
their potential risks.
The foregoing discussion of the information and factors
considered by the board is not exhaustive, but includes the
material factors considered by it. The board did not quantify or
assign relative weights to the specific factors considered in
reaching the determination to unanimously recommend that Phelps
Dodge shareholders vote FOR approval of the charter
amendment proposal and FOR the share issuance
proposal. In addition, individual directors may have given
different weights to different factors.
Please review the disclosure under Risk Factors and
Forward-Looking Information in this proxy statement
for a more complete description of certain other considerations
that you should consider in deciding how to vote at the special
meeting.
41
Unanimous Recommendation of the Phelps Dodge Board of
Directors
After careful consideration, the Phelps Dodge board of directors
determined that each proposal set forth below is in the best
interests of Phelps Dodges shareholders and unanimously
approved each such proposal and the combination.
|
|
|
1. the proposed amendment to and restatement of our
restated certificate of incorporation, which we refer to as the
charter amendment proposal, to (i) change the
companys name to Phelps Dodge Inco Corporation from Phelps
Dodge Corporation, (ii) increase the number of authorized
shares of Phelps Dodge common stock from 300 million shares
to 800 million shares and (iii) increase the maximum
number of members of Phelps Dodges board of directors from
12 to 15; |
|
|
|
2. the proposed issuance of Phelps Dodge common stock,
which we refer to as the share issuance proposal, to finance the
combination of Phelps Dodge with Inco; |
|
|
|
|
3. the charter amendment adjournment proposal; and |
|
|
|
|
4. the share issuance adjournment proposal. |
|
The Phelps Dodge board of directors unanimously recommends
that holders of shares of Phelps Dodge common stock vote
FOR the charter amendment proposal, FOR
the share issuance proposal, FOR the charter
amendment adjournment proposal and FOR the share
issuance adjournment proposal.
In approving the charter amendment proposal, the share issuance
proposal, the charter amendment adjournment proposal, the share
issuance adjournment proposal and the combination and making its
unanimous recommendation, the Phelps Dodge board of directors
consulted with Phelps Dodges senior management and Phelps
Dodges financial and legal advisors and considered a
number of strategic, financial and other considerations referred
to above under The Combination Phelps
Dodges Reasons for the Combination beginning on
page 39 of this proxy statement.
Opinions of Phelps Dodges Financial Advisors
We retained Citigroup and HSBC as our financial advisors in
connection with the transaction. In connection with their
engagement, we requested that Citigroup and HSBC evaluate the
fairness, from a financial point of view, to Phelps Dodge of the
Combination Consideration. On July 15 and 16, 2006, our
board of directors met to review the proposed waiver and the
terms of the amended combination agreement. At our board meeting
on July 15, 2006, Citigroup and HSBC made a joint
presentation in which they reviewed with our board of directors
certain financial analyses as described below and at our board
meeting on July 16, 2006 each rendered to our board an oral
opinion, subsequently confirmed in writing, that as of
July 16, 2006, and subject to the factors, assumptions,
procedures, limitations and qualifications set forth therein,
the Combination Consideration was fair, from a financial point
of view, to Phelps Dodge.
Citigroups and HSBCs written opinions, each dated
July 16, 2006, to our board of directors, the full text of
which sets forth, among other things, the general procedures
followed, factors considered, assumptions made, and limitations
and qualifications on the review undertaken by each of Citigroup
and HSBC in rendering their opinions, are attached as
Annex C and Annex D, respectively, and are
incorporated into this proxy statement by reference in their
entirety. You are encouraged to read these opinions carefully in
their entirety. Citigroups and HSBCs opinions speak
only as of the date of such opinions. Citigroups and
HSBCs opinions were provided to our board of directors for
its information in connection with its evaluation of the
Combination Consideration and relate only to the fairness, from
a financial point of view, of the Combination Consideration to
Phelps Dodge. Their respective opinions were not intended to be
and do not constitute any opinion or recommendation to any
shareholder as to how such shareholder should vote or act on any
matters relating to the proposed arrangement. The summaries of
Citigroups and HSBCs opinions in this proxy
statement are qualified in their entirety by reference to the
full text of the opinions.
42
Opinion of Citigroup Global Markets Inc. In arriving at
its opinion, Citigroup considered that Inco has a pending
business combination with Falconbridge pursuant to the support
agreement, and it reviewed the combination agreement and the
support agreement. It understood that Phelps Dodges
obligations under the combination agreement are subject to a
condition (which, subsequent to the delivery of its opinion, was
satisfied) that either (x)(i) Inco shall have acquired at
least 50.01% of the outstanding common shares of Falconbridge
calculated on a fully diluted basis, or (ii) the support
agreement shall have been terminated in accordance with its
terms without Inco having acquired any shares of Falconbridge
pursuant to its offer to Falconbridge shareholders and
(y) in the event that Inco shall have acquired at least
two-thirds of the outstanding common shares of Falconbridge,
Inco shall have completed a subsequent acquisition transaction
with Falconbridge contemplated by the combination agreement. In
arriving at its opinion, Citigroup also held discussions with
certain senior officers, directors and other representatives and
advisors of Phelps Dodge, certain senior officers and other
representatives and advisors of Inco and certain representatives
and advisors of Falconbridge concerning, as may be applicable,
the businesses, operations and prospects of Phelps Dodge, Inco
and Falconbridge. It examined certain publicly available
business and financial information relating to Phelps Dodge,
Inco and Falconbridge as well as certain financial forecasts and
other information and data relating to Phelps Dodge, Inco and
Falconbridge which were provided to or discussed with it by the
respective managements of Phelps Dodge and Inco, including
information relating to the potential strategic implications and
operational benefits (including the amount, timing and
achievability thereof) anticipated by the managements of Phelps
Dodge, Inco and Falconbridge to result from the arrangement
without the combination of Inco and Falconbridge being completed
(the Two-Way Business Combination) and the
arrangement being consummated in conjunction with the business
combination between Inco and Falconbridge being completed (the
Three-Way Business Combination). These financial
projections included financial projections prepared by the
management of Phelps Dodge assuming that the Three-Way Business
Combination were consummated or, in the alternative, the Two-Way
Business Combination were consummated. Citigroup reviewed the
financial terms of the arrangement as set forth in the
combination agreement in relation to, among other things:
current and historical market prices and trading volumes of
Phelps Dodge common stock and Inco common shares; the historical
and projected earnings and other operating data of Phelps Dodge
and Inco; and the capitalization and financial condition of
Phelps Dodge and Inco. In its review of the financial terms of
the Arrangement as set forth in the combination agreement,
Citigroup gave effect to the Three-Way Business Combination
being consummated or, in the alternative, the Two-Way Business
Combination being consummated. In that connection, Citigroup
reviewed the consummation of the Three-Way Business Combination
in relation to, among other things, the historical and projected
earnings and other operating data of Falconbridge and the
capitalization and financial condition of Falconbridge.
Citigroup considered, to the extent publicly available, the
financial terms of certain other transactions that it considered
relevant in evaluating the arrangement and analyzed certain
financial, stock market and other publicly available information
relating to the businesses of other companies whose operations
it considered relevant in evaluating those of Phelps Dodge, Inco
and Falconbridge. Citigroup also evaluated certain potential pro
forma financial effects of the arrangement on Phelps Dodge. In
addition to the foregoing, Citigroup conducted such other
analyses and examinations and considered such other information
and financial, economic and market criteria as it deemed
appropriate in arriving at its opinion.
In rendering its opinion, Citigroup assumed and relied, without
assuming any responsibility for independent verification, upon
the accuracy and completeness of all financial and other
information and data publicly available or provided to or
otherwise reviewed by or discussed with it and upon the
assurances of the managements of Phelps Dodge and Inco that they
were not aware of any relevant information that had been omitted
or that remained undisclosed to it. With respect to financial
forecasts and other information and data relating to Phelps
Dodge, Inco and Falconbridge provided to or otherwise reviewed
by or discussed with Citigroup, Citigroup was advised by the
respective managements of Phelps Dodge and Inco that, as may be
applicable, such forecasts and other information and data were
reasonably prepared on bases reflecting the best currently
available estimates and judgments of the managements of Phelps
Dodge, Inco and Falconbridge as to the future financial
performance of Phelps Dodge, Inco and Falconbridge, the
potential strategic implications and operational benefits
anticipated to result from the
43
Three-Way Business Combination and the Two-Way Business
Combination and the other matters covered thereby, and Citigroup
assumed, with the consent of Phelps Dodge, that the financial
results (including the potential strategic implications and
operational benefits anticipated to result from the Three-Way
Business Combination and Two-Way Business Combination) reflected
in the projections prepared by the management of Phelps Dodge
(assuming the consummation of the Three-Way Business Combination
or, in the alternative, the consummation of the Two-Way Business
Combination) and related information and data will be realized
in the amounts and at the times projected. Citigroup had limited
access to senior officers and representatives and advisors of
Falconbridge, and, accordingly, with the consent of Phelps
Dodge, Citigroup assumed and relied, without assuming any
responsibility for obtaining information directly from senior
officers and representatives and advisors of Falconbridge, upon
the accuracy and completeness of information provided by senior
officers and other representatives and advisors of Phelps Dodge
and Inco with respect to the business, operations and prospects
of Falconbridge, as well as certain financial forecasts and
other information and data relating to Falconbridge, including
information relating to the potential strategic implications and
operational benefits (including the amount, timing and
achievability thereof) anticipated by the management of
Falconbridge to result from the Three-Way Business Combination
or the Two-Way Business Combination. Citigroup assumed, with the
consent of Phelps Dodge, that the combination agreement and
support agreement (unless the support agreement were terminated)
will each be consummated in accordance with its terms, without
waiver, modification or amendment of any material term,
condition or agreement. Citigroup also assumed that, in the
course of obtaining the necessary regulatory or third-party
approvals, consents and releases for the Three-Way Business
Combination and the Two-Way Business Combination, no delay,
limitation, restriction or condition will be imposed that would
have an adverse effect on Phelps Dodge, Inco, Falconbridge or
the contemplated benefits of the Three-Way Business Combination
and the Two-Way Business Combination. Citigroup did not express
any opinion as to what the value of the stock consideration
actually will be when issued pursuant to the arrangement or the
price at which the Phelps Dodge common stock will trade at any
time. It did not make and was not provided with an independent
evaluation or appraisal of the assets or liabilities (contingent
or otherwise) of Phelps Dodge, Inco or Falconbridge nor did it
make any physical inspection of the properties or assets of
Phelps Dodge, Inco or Falconbridge. Its opinion was limited to
the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the Combination
Consideration to Phelps Dodge. In that connection, Citigroup
expressed no opinion with respect to the purchase of the
8% convertible subordinated notes of Inco due April 1,
2012, pursuant to the convertible note purchase agreement dated
as of June 25, 2006 (the Convertible Note Purchase
Agreement) between Phelps Dodge and Inco. Citigroup
expressed no opinion as to the underlying decision by Phelps
Dodge to engage in the arrangement, and Citigroup expressed no
view as to, and its opinion did not address, the relative merits
of the arrangement as compared to any alternative business
strategies that might exist for Phelps Dodge or the effect of
any other transaction in which Phelps Dodge might engage. In
connection with the consummation of the arrangement, Citigroup
also expressed no opinion with respect to the consideration to
be paid by Inco pursuant to the support agreement, and it also
expressed no view on the relative valuation or merits of the
consummation of the Three-Way Business Combination when compared
with the Two-Way Business Combination. Citigroups opinion
was necessarily based upon information available to it, and
financial, stock market and other conditions and circumstances
existing, as of the date delivered.
An affiliate of Citigroup engaged in the commercial lending
business is acting as lender and agent for credit facilities to
be used by Phelps Dodge in connection with the arrangement. See
The Combination Combination Consideration and
Financing beginning on page 29 of this proxy
statement. Citigroup and its affiliates in the past have
provided, and currently provide, services to Phelps Dodge, Inco
and Falconbridge unrelated to the proposed arrangement, for
which services Citigroup and such affiliates have received and
expect to receive compensation, including without limitation,
acting as underwriter for Phelps Dodge in its Peruvian bond
offering for Cerro Verde in April 2006, acting as advisor to
Phelps Dodge in its sale of Columbian Chemicals Company in March
2006, acting as underwriter in Phelps Dodges sale of its
investment in Southern Copper Corporation in June 2005, acting
as lead arranger in Phelps Dodges $1.1 billion
revolving credit facility in May 2005, acting as underwriter in
Incos $45 million trade receivables securitization in
October 2005 and acting as lead arranger in Incos
$750 million revolving
44
credit facility in May 2005. In the ordinary course of its
business, Citigroup and its affiliates may actively trade or
hold the securities of Phelps Dodge, Inco and Falconbridge for
its own account or for the account of its customers and,
accordingly, may at any time hold a long or short position in
such securities. In addition, Citigroup and its affiliates
(including Citigroup Inc. and its affiliates) may maintain
relationships with Phelps Dodge, Inco, Falconbridge and their
respective affiliates.
Opinion of HSBC Securities (USA) Inc. In arriving at
its opinion, HSBC considered that Inco has a pending business
combination with Falconbridge pursuant to the support agreement.
HSBC understood that Phelps Dodges obligations under the
combination agreement are subject to a condition (which,
subsequent to the delivery of its opinion, was satisfied) that
either (x)(i) Inco shall have acquired at least 50.01% of
the outstanding common shares of Falconbridge calculated on a
fully diluted basis, or (ii) the support agreement shall
have been terminated in accordance with its terms without Inco
having acquired any shares of Falconbridge pursuant to its offer
to Falconbridge shareholders and (y) in the event that Inco
shall have acquired at least two-thirds of the outstanding
common shares of Falconbridge, Inco shall have completed a
subsequent acquisition transaction with Falconbridge
contemplated by the combination agreement.
In connection with its opinion, HSBC:
|
|
|
(i) reviewed certain publicly available financial
statements and other business and financial information relating
to Phelps Dodge, Inco and Falconbridge; |
|
|
(ii) reviewed certain internal financial forecasts and
other information and data relating to Phelps Dodge, Inco and
Falconbridge which were provided to or discussed with it by the
respective managements of Phelps Dodge and Inco, including
information relating to the potential strategic implications and
operational benefits (including the amount, timing and
achievability thereof) anticipated by the managements of Phelps
Dodge, Inco and Falconbridge to result from the Three- Way
Business Combination and Two-Way Business Combination, which
financial projections included financial projections prepared by
the management of Phelps Dodge assuming the Three-Way Business
Combination or, in the alternative, the Two-Way Business
Combination; |
|
|
(iii) discussed with certain senior officers, directors and
other representatives and advisors of Phelps Dodge, certain
senior officers and other representatives and advisors of Inco
and certain representatives and advisors of Falconbridge
concerning, as may be applicable, the businesses, financial
condition, operations and prospects of Phelps Dodge, Inco and
Falconbridge; |
|
|
(iv) discussed the strategic rationale for, and potential
benefits of, the Three-Way Business Combination and the Two-Way
Business Combination with certain senior officers, directors and
other representatives and advisors of Phelps Dodge and certain
senior officers and other representatives and advisors of Inco; |
|
|
(v) reviewed the financial terms of the arrangement as set
forth in the combination agreement in relation to, among other
things: current and historical market prices and trading volumes
of Phelps Dodge common stock and Inco common shares; the
historical and projected earnings and other operating data of
Phelps Dodge and Inco; and the capitalization and financial
condition of Phelps Dodge and Inco; |
|
|
(vi) evaluated certain potential pro forma financial
effects of the arrangement on Phelps Dodge; |
|
|
(vii) considered, to the extent publicly available, the
financial terms of certain other transactions which it
considered relevant in evaluating the arrangement and analyzed
certain financial, stock market and other publicly available
information relating to the businesses of other companies whose
operations it considered relevant in evaluating those of Phelps
Dodge, Inco and Falconbridge; |
|
|
(viii) participated in discussions and negotiations among
representatives of Phelps Dodge, Inco and their respective
financial and legal advisors; and |
|
|
(ix) reviewed the combination agreement, the support
agreement and certain related documents. |
45
In addition to the foregoing, HSBC conducted such other analyses
and examinations and considered such other information and
financial, economic and market criteria as it deemed appropriate
in arriving at its opinion.
In its review of the financial terms of the arrangement as set
forth in the combination agreement, HSBC gave effect to the
Three-Way Business Combination being consummated or, in the
alternative, the Two-Way Business Combination. In that
connection, HSBC reviewed the Three-Way Business Combination in
relation to, among other things, the historical and projected
earnings and other operating data of Falconbridge and the
capitalization and financial condition of Falconbridge.
In rendering its opinion, HSBC assumed and relied, without
assuming any responsibility for independent verification, upon
the accuracy and completeness of all financial and other
information and data publicly available or provided to or
otherwise reviewed by or discussed with its and upon the
assurances of the managements of Phelps Dodge and Inco that they
were not aware of any relevant information that had been omitted
or that remained undisclosed to it. With respect to financial
forecasts and other information and data relating to Phelps
Dodge, Inco and Falconbridge provided to or otherwise reviewed
by or discussed with HSBC, HSBC was advised by the respective
managements of Phelps Dodge and Inco that, as may be applicable,
such forecasts and other information and data were reasonably
prepared on bases reflecting the best currently available
estimates and judgments of the managements of Phelps Dodge, Inco
and Falconbridge as to the future financial performance of
Phelps Dodge, Inco and Falconbridge, the potential strategic
implications and operational benefits anticipated to result from
the Three-Way Business Combination and the Two-Way Business
Combination and the other matters covered thereby, and HSBC
assumed, with the consent of Phelps Dodge, that the financial
results (including the potential strategic implications and
operational benefits anticipated to result from the Three-Way
Business Combination and the Two-Way Business Combination)
reflected in the projections prepared by the management of
Phelps Dodge (assuming the consummation of the Three-Way
Business Combination or, in the alternative, the consummation of
the Two-Way Business Combination) and related information and
data will be realized in the amounts and at the times projected.
HSBC had limited access to senior officers and other
representatives and advisors of Falconbridge, and, accordingly,
with the consent of Phelps Dodge, HSBC assumed and relied,
without assuming any responsibility for obtaining information
directly from senior officers and other representatives and
advisors of Falconbridge, upon the accuracy and completeness of
information provided by senior officers and other
representatives and advisors of Phelps Dodge and Inco with
respect to the business, operations and prospects of
Falconbridge, as well as certain financial forecasts and other
information and data relating to Falconbridge, including
information relating to the potential strategic implications and
operational benefits (including the amount, timing and
achievability thereof) anticipated by the management of
Falconbridge to result from the Three-Way Business Combination
or the Two-Way Business Combination. HSBC assumed, with the
consent of Phelps Dodge, that the combination agreement and
support agreement (unless the support agreement were terminated)
will each be consummated in accordance with its terms, without
waiver, modification or amendment of any material term,
condition or agreement. HSBC also assumed that, in the course of
obtaining the necessary regulatory or third-party approvals,
consents and releases for the Three-Way Business Combination and
the Two-Way Business Combination, no delay, limitation,
restriction or condition will be imposed that would have an
adverse effect on Phelps Dodge, Inco, Falconbridge or the
contemplated benefits of the Three-Way Business Combination or
the Two-Way Business Combination.
HSBC did not express any opinion as to what the value of the
stock consideration actually will be when issued pursuant to the
arrangement or the price at which the Phelps Dodge common stock
will trade at any time. It did not make and was not provided
with an independent evaluation or appraisal of the assets or
liabilities (contingent or otherwise) of Phelps Dodge, Inco or
Falconbridge nor did it make any physical inspection of the
properties or assets of Phelps Dodge, Inco or Falconbridge. HSBC
is not a legal, regulatory, accounting or tax expert and it
assumed the accuracy and veracity of all assessments made by
such advisors. HSBCs opinion is limited to the fairness,
from a financial point of view, of the Combination Consideration
to Phelps Dodge. In that connection, it expressed no opinion
with respect to the purchase of 8% convertible subordinated
notes of Inco due April 1, 2012, pursuant to the Convertible
46
Note Purchase Agreement. HSBC expressed no opinion as to the
underlying decision by Phelps Dodge to engage in the
arrangement, and it expressed no view as to, and its opinion did
not address, the relative merits of the arrangement as compared
to any alternative business strategies that might exist for
Phelps Dodge or the effect of any other transaction in which
Phelps Dodge might engage. In connection with the consummation
of the arrangement, HSBC expressed no opinion with respect to
the consideration to be paid by Inco pursuant to the support
agreement, and it also expressed no view on the relative
valuation or merits of the consummation of the Three-Way
Business Combination when compared with the Two-Way Business
Combination. HSBCs opinion is necessarily based upon
information available to it, and financial, stock market and
other conditions and circumstances existing, as of the date
delivered.
An affiliate of HSBC engaged in the commercial lending business
is acting as lender and agent for credit facilities to be used
by Phelps Dodge in connection with the arrangement. See
The Combination Combination Consideration and
Financing beginning on page 29 of this proxy
statement. HSBC and its affiliates in the past have provided,
and currently provide, services to Phelps Dodge, Inco and
Falconbridge unrelated to the proposed arrangement, for which
services HSBC and such affiliates have received and expect to
receive compensation, including without limitation, acting as a
participant in the $2,900 million term loan portion of the
$5,500 million revolving credit facility to Inco to fund
the acquisition of Falconbridge pursuant to the support
agreement, acting as a lender to Inco in a $750 million
revolving credit facility and a $400 million term loan,
each established in 2004, acting as a member of the Girardin
structured tax syndicate facility for Incos Goro Project
in New Caledonia in 2005 and acting as a lender to Falconbridge
under a $60 million bilateral revolving credit facility in
2005. HSBC also maintains other trading, overdraft and interest
rate swap facilities for each of Inco, Falconbridge and their
respective affiliates. In connection with the above-described
services, HSBC has received, and may receive, compensation. HSBC
is a part of the global HSBC Holdings plc group, a full-service
banking and securities firm engaged in securities trading,
investment management and brokerage activities, as well as
providing investment banking, financing and financial advisory
services. In the ordinary course of its business, HSBC and its
affiliates may actively trade or hold the debt and equity
securities (or related derivative securities) of Phelps Dodge,
Inco and Falconbridge for its own account or for the account of
its customers and, accordingly, may at any time hold a long or
short position in such securities. In addition, HSBC and its
affiliates may maintain relationships with Phelps Dodge, Inco,
Falconbridge and their respective affiliates.
Joint Financial Analyses of Citigroup and HSBC
The following is a summary of the material financial analyses
performed by Citigroup and HSBC in evaluating the fairness of
the Combination Consideration to Phelps Dodge. Citigroup and
HSBC collaborated in performing each of the financial analyses
summarized below. The following summary, however, does not
purport to be a complete description of the financial analyses
performed by Citigroup or HSBC, nor does the order of analyses
described represent relative importance or weight given to those
analyses by Citigroup or HSBC. Some of the summaries of
financial analyses include information presented in tabular
format. The tables must be read together with the full text of
each summary and are alone not a complete description of the
financial analyses performed by Citigroup and HSBC. Except as
otherwise noted, the following quantitative information, to the
extent that it is based on market data, is based on market data
as it existed on or before July 16, 2006, and is not
necessarily indicative of current or future market conditions.
Transaction Overview and Valuation Statistics
Citigroup and HSBC provided a situation update to the Phelps
Dodge board of directors reflecting the increase in the
Combination Consideration as described to Citigroup and HSBC by
Phelps Dodge management, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
an increase of the cash consideration to be paid to Inco
shareholders of Cdn.$2.75 per share to Cdn.$20.25; |
47
|
|
|
|
|
the fixed exchange ratio of 0.672x (Phelps Dodge share per Inco
share); |
|
|
|
the implied offer value of Cdn.$80.70 (US$71.58) per share
(based on the closing price of the common stock of Phelps Dodge
of $79.79 and an US$/Cdn.$ exchange rate of 0.8870, each on
July 14, 2006); |
|
|
|
Inco increases the cash consideration of its bid for
Falconbridge by Cdn.$1.00 to Cdn.$18.50; |
|
|
|
Falconbridge issues a special dividend to existing shareholders
of Cdn.$0.75 per share (which is reflected as additional debt
assumed by Phelps Dodge in the Three-Way Business Combination);
and |
|
|
|
an increase in total debt from $21.965 billion to
$23.634 billion and an increase in total debt to
capitalization from 44.0% to 45.8% (assuming the Three-Way
Business Combination is consummated). |
Citigroup and HSBC calculated for the Phelps Dodge board of
directors various multiples resulting from the arrangement. The
following table presents the results of Citigroups and
HSBCs calculations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inco at | |
|
Phelps Dodge/Inco | |
|
|
Inco at | |
|
Offer | |
|
Post-Falconbridge | |
July 14, 2006 |
|
Market Price: | |
|
Price: | |
|
at Offer Price: | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Price/2007E EPS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Call Consensus Estimates
|
|
|
13.4 |
x |
|
|
14.5 |
x |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
Management Base Case(1)
|
|
|
9.8 |
x |
|
|
10.5 |
x |
|
|
9.2 |
x |
EV/2007E EBITDA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Call Consensus Estimates
|
|
|
6.4 |
x |
|
|
6.7 |
x |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
Management Base Case(2)
|
|
|
5.1 |
x |
|
|
5.4 |
x |
|
|
5.3 |
x |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Earnings Per Share (EPS) for Inco and Falconbridge based on
Phelps Dodge management base case estimates, including synergies. |
|
|
(2) |
Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization
(EBITDA) for Inco and Falconbridge based on Phelps Dodge
management base case estimates, including synergies. |
Citigroup and HSBC also calculated for the Phelps Dodge board of
directors various premiums resulting from the arrangement. The
following table presents the results of Citigroups and
HSBCs calculations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inco at | |
|
Falconbridge at | |
July 14, 2006 |
|
Offer Price | |
|
Offer Price | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Premium to(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 day (based on Incos common shares of Cdn.$74.89 and
Falconbridges common shares of Cdn.$61.00 on July 14,
2006)
|
|
|
7.8 |
% |
|
|
4.0 |
% |
Inco and Falconbridge common share price as of June 23, 2006
|
|
|
23.7 |
% |
|
|
14.3 |
% |
10 day average
|
|
|
23.3 |
% |
|
|
15.8 |
% |
30 day average
|
|
|
17.9 |
% |
|
|
15.4 |
% |
60 day average
|
|
|
14.2 |
% |
|
|
19.1 |
% |
90 day average
|
|
|
17.7 |
% |
|
|
23.2 |
% |
180 day average
|
|
|
27.6 |
% |
|
|
37.6 |
% |
52 week high
|
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
|
11.8 |
% |
52 week low
|
|
|
77.2 |
% |
|
|
205.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Average prices weighted by volumes. |
48
|
|
|
Pro Forma Merger Analysis. |
Citigroup and HSBC analyzed the pro forma financial impact of
the arrangement on projected earnings per share (EPS) and
cash flow per share, defined as earnings per share plus
depreciation, depletion and amortization (CFPS). This analysis
was based on the Three-Way Business Combination and, in the
alternative, the Two-Way Business Combination. The earnings
estimates were prepared by Phelps Dodge for each of the
Three-Way Business Combination and Two-Way Business Combination.
Phelps Dodge, in preparing the earnings estimates, prepared
different cases on different price assumptions for various
commodities, including copper and nickel. While each of Phelps
Dodge, Inco and Falconbridge produces commodities other than
nickel and copper, the pro forma combination analysis for the
Three-Way Business Combination and Two-Way Business Combination
is most sensitive to nickel and copper prices. These assumptions
and the corresponding cases were as follows:
Copper Price Deck Assumptions ($ per lb)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006E | |
|
2007E | |
|
2008E | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Management Base Case
|
|
$ |
2.85 |
|
|
$ |
2.25 |
|
|
$ |
1.75 |
|
Management Upside Case
|
|
$ |
3.50 |
|
|
$ |
3.00 |
|
|
$ |
2.50 |
|
Management Downside Case
|
|
$ |
2.25 |
|
|
$ |
1.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
Street Case(1)
|
|
$ |
2.80 |
|
|
$ |
2.49 |
|
|
$ |
2.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Street Case was based on the average of publicly available
equity research estimates published from April 11, 2006,
through June 19, 2006, for 10 commodities, including
copper, nickel, molybdenum, zinc, aluminum, cobalt, silver,
gold, platinum and palladium. The price estimates for copper
were based on the average of up to 24 equity research estimates. |
Nickel Price Deck Assumptions ($ per lb)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006E | |
|
2007E | |
|
2008E | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Management Base Case
|
|
$ |
8.25 |
|
|
$ |
7.60 |
|
|
$ |
6.20 |
|
Management Upside Case
|
|
$ |
9.30 |
|
|
$ |
10.00 |
|
|
$ |
8.20 |
|
Management Downside Case
|
|
$ |
7.00 |
|
|
$ |
5.85 |
|
|
$ |
3.50 |
|
Street Case(1)
|
|
$ |
7.81 |
|
|
$ |
7.16 |
|
|
$ |
6.10 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Street Case was based on the average of publicly available
equity research estimates published from April 11, 2006,
through June 19, 2006, for 10 commodities, including
copper, nickel, molybdenum, zinc, aluminum, cobalt, silver,
gold, platinum and palladium. The price estimates for nickel
were based on the average of up to 20 equity research estimates. |
Each case was based on the following transaction assumptions,
per Phelps Dodges management:
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2006, closing; |
|
|
|
pre-tax synergies (i) for the Three-Way Business
Combination of $484 million for 2007 and $923 million
in 2008 and (ii) for the Two-Way Business Combination of
$143 million in 2007 and $272 million in 2008; |
|
|
|
asset write-up based on
Phelps Dodge management estimate of net asset value amortized
over a weighted average life of approximately 20 years; |
|
|
|
Falconbridge special dividend of Cdn.$0.75 per share issued to
existing Falconbridge shareholders (included as additional debt
assumed by Phelps Dodge in the Three-Way Business Combination); |
|
|
|
repurchase of $5.0 billion of Phelps Dodge common stock
(assumed to be effected at market price on closing of the
combination); |
49
|
|
|
|
|
Phelps Dodge dividend policy of $0.80 per common share
maintained; and |
|
|
|
stock prices and a US$/Cdn.$ exchange rate of 0.8870, each as of
July 14, 2006. |
The estimated financial impact of the Three-Way Business
Combination and the Two-Way Business Combination on selected
financial statistics of Phelps Dodge is as follows:
Three-Way Business Combination
EPS Accretion/(Dilution) %
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base |
|
Upside |
|
Downside |
|
Street |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007E
|
|
(2.4%) |
|
5.6% |
|
(19.7%) |
|
(10.8%) |
2008E
|
|
5.3% |
|
4.5% |
|
Not Meaningful |
|
(9.2%) |
Break-Even Synergies (cushion) 2007/2008 (in
billions)(1)
|
|
$0.2/($0.3) |
|
($0.8)/($0.5) |
|
$0.4/Not
Meaningful |
|
$1.1/$0.7 |
|
|
(1) |
Break-even synergies/(cushion) equals incremental pre-tax
synergies required, or cushion available, to result in no
dilution. |
CFPS Accretion/ Dilution %
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base |
|
Upside |
|
Downside |
|
Street |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007E
|
|
17.4% |
|
17.2% |
|
49.2% |
|
8.1% |
2008E
|
|
34.5% |
|
20.2% |
|
Not Meaningful |
|
15.6% |
Break-Even Synergies (cushion) 2007/2008 (in
billions)(1)
|
|
($1.8)/($2.5) |
|
($2.7)/($2.7) |
|
($1.7)/Not
Meaningful |
|
($0.9)/($1.5) |
|
|
(1) |
Break-even synergies/(cushion) equals incremental pre-tax
synergies required, or cushion available, to result in no
dilution. |
Two-Way Business Combination
EPS Accretion/(Dilution) %
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base |
|
Upside |
|
Downside |
|
Street |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007E
|
|
(5.7%) |
|
0.7% |
|
(18.4%) |
|
(11.5%) |
2008E
|
|
0.4% |
|
2.7% |
|
Not Meaningful |
|
(8.4%) |
Break-Even Synergies
(cushion) 2007/2008 (in billions)(1)
|
|
$0.3/($0.0) |
|
($0.1)/($0.2) |
|
$0.2/Not
Meaningful |
|
$0.8/$0.5 |
|
|
(1) |
Break-even synergies/(cushion) equals incremental pre-tax
synergies required, or cushion available, to result in no
dilution. |
50
CFPS Accretion/ Dilution %
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base |
|
Upside |
|
Downside |
|
Street |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007E
|
|
11.8% |
|
11.0% |
|
40.9% |
|
5.0% |
2008E
|
|
28.0% |
|
17.2% |
|
Not Meaningful |
|
14.2% |
Break-Even Synergies (cushion) 2007/2008 (in
billions)(1)
|
|
($0.8)/($1.4) |
|
($1.2)/($1.5) |
|
($1.0)/Not
Meaningful |
|
($0.4)/($0.9) |
|
|
(1) |
Break-even synergies/(cushion) equals incremental pre-tax
synergies required, or cushion available, to result in no
dilution. |
|
|
|
Selected Companies Analysis. |
Citigroup and HSBC reviewed certain financial information for
Phelps Dodge on a stand-alone basis, as well as assuming a
Three-Way Business Combination and Two-Way Business Combination,
and compared it to corresponding financial information, ratios
and public market multiples for the following selected publicly
traded companies in the metals and mining industry:
|
|
|
Large Cap Base Metals/ Diversified |
|
|
|
|
|
Teck Cominco Limited |
|
|
|
Antofagasta plc |
|
|
|
Freeport McMoRan Copper & Gold, Inc. |
|
|
|
Southern Copper Corporation |
|
|
|
Vedanta Resources plc |
|
|
|
|
|
Rio Tinto plc |
|
|
|
BHP Billiton Limited |
|
|
|
Anglo American plc |
|
|
|
Xstrata plc |
|
|
|
Companhia Vale do Rio Doce |
|
|
|
|
|
Jubilee Platinum plc |
|
|
|
Minara Resources Limited |
|
|
|
FNX Mining Company Inc. |
|
|
|
MMC Norilsk Nickel Group |
|
|
|
The Eramet Group |
|
|
|
|
|
Kazakhmys plc |
|
|
|
KGHM Polska Miedz S.A. |
|
|
|
Aur Resources Inc. |
|
|
|
Inmet Mining Corporation |
|
|
|
Southern Copper Corporation |
51
Although none of the selected companies was directly comparable
to Phelps Dodge, Inco and Falconbridge, the companies included
were chosen because they are publicly traded companies with
businesses and operations that, for purposes of analysis, may be
considered similar to certain businesses and operations of,
Phelps Dodge, Inco and Falconbridge (or a combination thereof).
The financial information used by Citigroup and HSBC for all
selected comparable company analysis in the case of this
analysis was based on First Call consensus estimates and Street
research. The financial information used for Phelps Dodge on a
stand-alone basis was based on both management estimates and
First Call consensus estimates. The financial information used
for the Three-Way Business Combination and Two-Way Business
Combination was based on Phelps Dodge management estimates and
reflected each of the different cases that was prepared. All of
the multiples and ratios were calculated using public trading
market closing prices on July 14, 2006 and using the
implied offer value of Cdn. $80.70 (US$71.58) per
share (based on the closing price of the common stock of Phelps
Dodge of $79.79). For Phelps Dodge, on a stand-alone basis, and
the selected comparable companies, Citigroup and HSBC calculated:
|
|
|
|
|
the enterprise value, which is the market value of common equity
plus the book value of net debt (total debt minus cash),
preferred stock and minority interest, less investments in
unconsolidated affiliates, as a multiple of estimated 2007
EBITDA; |
|
|
|
the ratio of the price per share to the estimated 2007 EPS, or
Price/ Earnings (P/E) multiple; and |
|
|
|
the ratio of the price per share to the estimated 2007 CFPS, or
Price/ Cash Flow Per Share multiple. |
The multiples for the comparable companies did not include a
control premium.
The results of these analyses are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enterprise Value/ | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA | |
|
P/E | |
|
P/CFPS | |
|
|
2007E | |
|
2007E | |
|
2007E | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Selected Companies in the Metals and Mining Industry
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large Cap Base Metals/ Diversified(1)
|
|
|
3.3x-5.2x |
|
|
|
6.7x-10.6x |
|
|
|
5.8x-9.0x |
|
|
Super Major Diversified
|
|
|
5.9x-6.8x |
|
|
|
7.3x-10.5x |
|
|
|
7.3x-9.0x |
|
|
Nickel(2)
|
|
|
4.6x-8.3x |
|
|
|
7.4x-17.2x |
|
|
|
5.9x-10.9x |
|
|
Copper
|
|
|
3.2x-5.1x |
|
|
|
6.1x-7.7x |
|
|
|
5.0x-6.7x |
|
Phelps Dodge Stand-alone
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management estimate
|
|
|
3.2x |
|
|
|
6.2x |
|
|
|
5.2x |
|
|
First Call Consensus estimate
|
|
|
3.0x |
|
|
|
6.2x |
|
|
|
5.2x |
|
Three-Way Business Combination
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Upside Case
|
|
|
3.4x |
|
|
|
5.3x |
|
|
|
4.1x |
|
|
Base Case
|
|
|
5.3x |
|
|
|
9.2x |
|
|
|
6.2x |
|
|
Street Case
|
|
|
5.4x |
|
|
|
9.5x |
|
|
|
6.3x |
|
|
Downside Case
|
|
|
10.4x |
|
|
|
31.7x |
|
|
|
11.9x |
|
Two-Way Business Combination
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Upside Case
|
|
|
3.5x |
|
|
|
6.3x |
|
|
|
5.0x |
|
|
Base Case
|
|
|
5.4x |
|
|
|
10.5x |
|
|
|
7.4x |
|
|
Street Case
|
|
|
5.7x |
|
|
|
11.4x |
|
|
|
7.7x |
|
|
Downside Case
|
|
|
9.5x |
|
|
|
23.9x |
|
|
|
12.1x |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Excludes Falconbridge and Inco. |
|
|
(2) |
Excludes Inco. |
52
Citigroup and HSBC selected the comparable companies used in the
comparable company analysis because their businesses and
operating profiles are reasonably similar to that of Phelps
Dodge, Inco and Falconbridge. However, because of the inherent
differences among the businesses, operations and prospects of
Phelps Dodge, Inco and Falconbridge and the businesses,
operations and prospects of the selected comparable companies,
no comparable company is exactly the same as Phelps Dodge, Inco
and Falconbridge. Therefore, Citigroup and HSBC believed that it
was inappropriate to, and therefore did not, rely solely on the
quantitative results of the comparable analysis. Accordingly,
Citigroup and HSBC made qualitative judgments concerning
differences between the financial and operating characteristics
and prospects of Phelps Dodge, Inco and Falconbridge and the
companies included in the comparable company analysis that would
affect the public trading values of each in order to provide a
context in which to consider the results of the quantitative
analysis. These qualitative judgments related primarily to the
differing sizes, growth prospects, profitability levels and
business segments between Phelps Dodge, Inco and Falconbridge
and the companies included in the comparable company analysis.
|
|
|
Precedent Transactions Analysis. |
Citigroup and HSBC reviewed implied purchase price multiples and
premiums paid in the following six precedent transactions in the
mineral and mining industry:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquiror |
|
|
|
Target |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*Teck |
|
|
|
Inco |
|
|
*Xstrata |
|
|
|
Falconbridge |
|
|
*Inco |
|
|
|
Falconbridge |
|
|
BHP Billiton |
|
|
|
WMC Resources |
|
|
BHP Company Limited |
|
|
|
Magma Copper Company |
|
|
Noranda |
|
|
|
Falconbridge |
(*) Pending acquisition as of July 16, 2006.
In light of the strength of the commodity prices today,
Citigroup and HSBC only chose precedent transactions that were
announced during a relatively strong commodity price environment
in order to enhance comparability.
For each of the selected transactions and for each of the
Three-Way Business Combination and
Two-Way Business
Combination, Citigroup and HSBC calculated and compared the
resulting:
|
|
|
|
|
enterprise value as multiple of EBITDA for the last
12 months (LTM EBITDA); and |
|
|
|
enterprise value as multiple of estimated forward fiscal year
EBITDA (Forward EBITDA). |
For purposes of this analysis, enterprise value was calculated
by determining each target companys implied equity value
and then adding the book value of each target companys net
debt, preferred stock and minority interest, less investments in
unconsolidated affiliates. LTM EBITDA, net debt and minority
interest were calculated using each target companys most
recent quarterly filing with the SEC or other publicly disclosed
information as of the respective announcement dates. Forward
EBITDA was based on First Call consensus estimates of forward
fiscal year at time of announcement.
53
The following table presents the results of this analysis for
the precedent transactions and each of the Three-Way Business
Combination and Two-Way Business Combination:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multiple of LTM EBITDA: |
|
Multiple of Forward EBITDA: |
|
|
|
|
|
Teck/Inco(1)
|
|
|
11.2x |
|
|
|
8.5x |
|
Xstrata/ Falconbridge(1)
|
|
|
9.5x |
|
|
|
6.4x |
|
Inco/ Falconbridge(1)
|
|
|
8.4x |
|
|
|
6.9x |
|
BHP Billiton/ WMC Resources
|
|
|
6.9x |
|
|
|
7.6x |
|
BHP Company Limited/ Magma Copper Company
|
|
|
6.1x |
|
|
|
5.0x |
|
Noranda/ Falconbridge
|
|
|
5.3x |
|
|
|
5.1x |
|
Two-Way Business Combination(2)
|
|
|
9.4x |
|
|
|
7.0x |
|
Three-Way Business Combination(2)
|
|
|
8.4x |
|
|
|
6.4x |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Pending as of July 16, 2006. Implied LTM transaction
multiples for pending transactions based on LTM 3/31/06, which
is assumed to be the latest publicly available
12-month period to be
disclosed prior to the expected closing date of the transaction. |
|
(2) |
|
Implied LTM transaction multiples for Two-Way Business
Combination and Three-Way Business Combination based on LTM
6/30/06 EBITDA, which is assumed to be the latest publicly
available 12-month
period to be disclosed prior to the expected closing date of the
transaction. |
Citigroup and HSBC sought precedent transactions that were most
comparable to the
Three-Way Business
Combination and the
Two-Way Business
Combination. Nevertheless, because the reasons for and the
circumstances surrounding each of the transactions analyzed were
so diverse and because of the inherent differences in the
businesses, operations, financial conditions and prospects of
Inco and Falconbridge, and the businesses, operations and
financial conditions of the companies included in the precedent
transaction analysis, Citigroup and HSBC believed that a purely
quantitative comparable transaction analysis would not be
particularly meaningful in the context of the
Three-Way Business
Combination or the
Two-Way Business
Combination. Citigroup and HSBC believed that the appropriate
use of the precedent transaction analysis in this instance
involves qualitative judgments concerning the differences
between the characteristics of these transactions and the
Three-Way Business Combination and the Two-Way Business
Combination. Citigroup and HSBC, in their discussions with the
Phelps Dodge board of directors, placed the most emphasis on the
BHP Billiton acquisition of WMC Resources transaction given that
it was consummated and because Citigroup and HSBC believe WMC
Resources has the most similarity to Inco and Falconbridge, in
terms of size and quality of assets.
Citigroup and HSBC considered a net asset value
(NAV) approach to Inco on a stand-alone basis and
Inco on a combined basis with Falconbridge. The NAV approach
builds up a value by separately considering each operating,
development, exploration and financial asset, the individual
values of which are estimated through the application of that
methodology viewed as most appropriate in the circumstances, net
of obligations and liabilities, including reclamation and
closure costs, and the present value of corporate expenses not
directly attributable to operating and development assets. The
NAV approach adopts a prospective view in regard to commodity
prices and explicitly addresses the unique characteristics of
each major asset.
To value the operating mines and other developmental exploration
of final assets of Inco and Falconbridge, Citigroup and HSBC
relied primarily on a discounted cash flow (DCF)
analysis whereby it discounted the present value of the
unleveraged after-tax cash flows of each asset over a horizon
equal to the remaining life of the asset and at a prescribed
discount rate to generate present values. Citigroup and HSBC
used cash flow estimates provided by Phelps Dodge for the
relevant periods. These cash flows were prepared based on
different price assumptions for various commodities, including
copper and nickel,
54
as reflected in the Upside Case, Downside Case, Base Case and
Street Case. The prescribed real discount rate was 7% and 8%.
Citigroup and HSBC chose the discount rates utilized in this
analysis based upon an analysis of the weighted average cost of
capital of Phelps Dodge, Inco and Falconbridge, adjusted
downward for long-term inflation. With respect to Inco on a
stand-alone basis, the unleveraged after-tax cash flows were
also adjusted to reflect Phelps Dodge management estimates of
synergies associated with combining the businesses and
operations of Inco and Phelps Dodge. In the event that Inco
combines with Falconbridge, the unleveraged after-tax cash flows
were also adjusted to reflect Phelps Dodge management estimates
of synergies associated with combining the businesses and
operations of Inco and Falconbridge; Phelps Dodge and Inco; and
Phelps Dodge and Falconbridge. Citigroup and HSBC calculated per
share equity values based on adding the present values of the
after-tax unleveraged free cash flows of the assets of Inco and
Falconbridge for each scenario, and then subtracting from this
value the net debt, and dividing those amounts by the number of
fully diluted shares of the applicable entity.
The results of these analyses are summarized as follows:
Inco Combined with Falconbridge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implied Multiple |
Case |
|
NAV/ share |
|
@ Cdn.$80.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
Base Case (7% discount)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inco/ Falconbridge
|
|
Cdn.$ |
39.93 |
|
|
|
2.0x |
|
|
plus Inco/ Falconbridge Synergies
|
|
|
50.01 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
plus PD/ Falconbridge Synergies
|
|
|
52.28 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
plus PD/ Inco Synergies
|
|
|
55.98 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
Upside Case (7% discount)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inco/ Falconbridge
|
|
Cdn.$ |
79.69 |
|
|
|
1.0x |
|
|
plus Inco/ Falconbridge Synergies
|
|
|
89.77 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
plus PD/ Falconbridge Synergies
|
|
|
92.04 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
plus PD/ Inco Synergies
|
|
|
95.74 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
Downside Case (7% discount)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inco/ Falconbridge
|
|
Cdn.$ |
(2.82 |
) |
|
|
Not Meaningful |
|
|
plus Inco/ Falconbridge Synergies
|
|
|
7.26 |
|
|
|
Not Meaningful |
|
|
plus PD/ Falconbridge Synergies
|
|
|
9.52 |
|
|
|
8.5x |
|
|
plus PD/ Inco Synergies
|
|
|
13.22 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
Street Case (7% discount)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inco/ Falconbridge
|
|
Cdn.$ |
40.91 |
|
|
|
2.0x |
|
|
plus Inco/ Falconbridge Synergies
|
|
|
51.00 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
plus PD/ Falconbridge Synergies
|
|
|
53.26 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
plus PD/ Inco Synergies
|
|
|
56.96 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base Case (8% discount)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inco/ Falconbridge
|
|
Cdn.$ |
31.85 |
|
|
|
2.5x |
|
|
plus Inco/ Falconbridge Synergies
|
|
|
41.08 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
plus PD/ Falconbridge Synergies
|
|
|
43.09 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
plus PD/ Inco Synergies
|
|
|
46.53 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
Inco on a Stand-alone Basis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implied Multiple |
Case |
|
NAV/share |
|
@ Cdn.$80.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
Base Case (7% discount)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inco Stand-alone
|
|
Cdn.$ |
43.34 |
|
|
|
1.9x |
|
|
plus PD Synergies
|
|
|
50.54 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
Upside Case (7% discount)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inco Stand-alone
|
|
Cdn.$ |
84.00 |
|
|
|
1.0x |
|
|
plus PD Synergies
|
|
|
91.20 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
Downside Case (7% discount)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inco Stand-alone
|
|
Cdn.$ |
9.23 |
|
|
|
8.7x |
|
|
plus PD Synergies
|
|
|
16.43 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
Street Case (7% discount)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inco Stand-alone
|
|
Cdn.$ |
45.09 |
|
|
|
1.8x |
|
|
plus PD Synergies
|
|
|
52.29 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base Case (8% discount)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inco Stand-alone
|
|
Cdn.$ |
34.20 |
|
|
|
2.4x |
|
|
plus PD Synergies
|
|
|
40.91 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assessment of the NAV Approach |
Citigroup and HSBC, in presenting their NAV analysis to the
Phelps Dodge board of directors, noted that forecast commodity
prices and exchange rate assumptions are a critical determinant
of the NAV analysis. Because the NAV approach requires the
valuator to make a number of assumptions, valuators could derive
different NAVs for the same assets. Future commodity prices and
exchange rates are very difficult to predict and different views
can have a very significant impact on resulting values as
reflected by the differences between the upside case and
downside case. Citigroup and HSBC also expressly noted to the
board of directors the limitations to NAV analysis, particularly
in a strong commodity environment. As the NAV methodology adopts
a prospective, long-term view with respect to commodity prices,
it is not as sensitive to the current levels of commodity prices
as are the precedent transactions analysis and comparable
trading analysis, that are based on metrics which reflect the
current strength of commodity prices. At this stage of the
commodity price cycle, a significant number of publicly traded
mining companies are trading at premiums to their NAV. Citigroup
and HSBC noted that the values of the common stock of Inco and
Falconbridge also currently trade at a premium to their NAV. In
addition, the NAV approach values the development and
exploration of a mine at the time of the analysis and does not
ascribe value to the replacement of reserves through additional
exploration over time. This is another reason that may factor
into a company trading at a premium to NAV. Therefore it is
difficult to observe premiums to NAV in the market and it is
difficult to otherwise determine a reliable basis for selecting
the appropriate premiums to NAV at which the common stock of
Inco and Falconbridge should be valued. Thus Citigroup and HSBC
did not rely, in any material respect, on this method in
rendering their respective fairness opinions.
General.
The preparation of a fairness opinion is a complex process
involving subjective judgments as to the most appropriate
methods of financial analysis and the application of those
methods to the particular facts and circumstances, and therefore
is not necessarily susceptible to partial analysis or summary
description.
Citigroup and HSBC made no attempt to assign specific weights to
particular analyses or factors considered, but rather each made
its own qualitative judgments as to the significance and
relevance of all the analyses and factors considered and
determined to give its fairness opinion as described above.
Selecting
56
portions of the analyses or of the summary set forth herein,
without considering the analyses as a whole, could create a
misleading or incomplete view of the processes underlying the
opinions of Citigroup and HSBC.
In arriving at their respective fairness determinations,
Citigroup and HSBC each separately considered the results of all
of their analyses and did not form any conclusion as to whether
any individual analysis, considered in isolation, supported or
failed to support an opinion as to fairness from a financial
point of view. Rather, Citigroup and HSBC each made its
respective determination as to fairness on the basis of its
experience and professional judgment after considering the
results of all of their analyses assessed as a whole. No company
or transaction referenced in the above analyses is directly
comparable to Phelps Dodge, Inco, Falconbridge or the
arrangement. Such comparative analyses necessarily involve
complex considerations and judgments concerning financial and
operating characteristics, market conditions and other factors
that could affect the public trading of the selected companies
or terms of the selected transactions.
Citigroup and HSBC prepared the analyses described herein for
purposes of providing their respective opinions to the Phelps
Dodge board of directors as to the fairness, from a financial
point of view, of the combination agreement to Phelps Dodge, and
their opinions are not intended to be and do not constitute
recommendations. These analyses do not purport to be appraisals
nor do they necessarily reflect the prices at which businesses
or securities actually may be sold. Analyses based upon
forecasts of future results are not necessarily indicative of
actual future results, which may be significantly more or less
favorable than suggested by these analyses. Because these
analyses are inherently subject to uncertainty, being based upon
numerous factors or events beyond the control of the parties or
their respective advisors, none of Phelps Dodge, Citigroup, HSBC
or any other person assumes responsibility if future results are
materially different from those forecast.
As described above, each of the respective opinions of Citigroup
and HSBC to the Phelps Dodge board of directors was one of a
number of factors taken into consideration by Phelps
Dodges board of directors in making its determination to
unanimously approve the transactions contemplated by the
combination agreement. For a further discussion of the factors
the Phelps Dodge board of directors considered, see The
Combination Phelps Dodges Reasons for the
Combination and The Combination Unanimous
Recommendation of the Phelps Dodge Board of Directors
beginning on page 39 and 42, respectively, of this proxy
statement. Citigroup and HSBC were not asked to, and did not,
recommend the specific consideration payable in the arrangement,
which consideration was determined through negotiations between
Phelps Dodge and Inco. The summary contained herein does not
purport to be a complete description of the analyses performed
by Citigroup and HSBC in connection with their respective
fairness opinions and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to the written opinion of Citigroup and the written opinion of
HSBC attached as Annexes C and D, respectively.
We selected Citigroup and HSBC as our financial advisors in
connection with the combination based on their qualifications,
experience and reputation, their familiarity with Phelps Dodge
and the significance of the proposed matter for Phelps Dodge.
Citigroup and HSBC are internationally recognized investment
banking firms and are regularly engaged in the valuation of
businesses and securities in connection with mergers and
acquisitions, leveraged buyouts, negotiated underwritings,
competitive biddings, secondary distributions of listed and
unlisted securities, private placements and valuations for
corporate and other purposes.
Pursuant to the terms of the engagement letter between Phelps
Dodge and Citigroup, Phelps Dodge has agreed to pay to Citigroup
a fee equal to $1 million in connection with the delivery
of its fairness opinion dated June 25, 2006, and Citigroup
will receive an additional fee (inclusive of the amount paid in
connection with such opinion) of (i) $18 million in
the event of a business combination of Phelps Dodge with Inco
only or (ii) $30 million in the event of a business
combination of Phelps Dodge with Inco and Falconbridge. Pursuant
to the terms of the engagement letter between Phelps Dodge and
HSBC, Phelps Dodge has agreed to pay to HSBC a fee equal to
$1 million in connection with the delivery of its fairness
opinion dated June 25, 2006, and HSBC will receive an
additional fee (inclusive of the amount paid in connection with
such opinion) of (i) $12 million in the event of a
business combination of Phelps Dodge with Inco only or
(ii) $20 million in the event of a business
combination of Phelps Dodge with Inco and Falconbridge. In
addition, Phelps Dodge has agreed to reimburse each of Citigroup
and HSBC,
57
respectively, for its reasonable expenses incurred in connection
with its engagement, including reasonable attorneys fees
and disbursements, and to indemnify each of Citigroup and HSBC
against specific liabilities and expenses relating to or arising
out of its engagement, including liabilities under the federal
securities laws.
Interests of Phelps Dodge Employees in the Combination
Under the terms of our various compensation plans and programs,
the combination of Phelps Dodge with Inco would constitute a
change of control that provides certain additional
benefits to our employees. As is more fully described below, we
have sought and received from each of our named executive
officers amendments to these arrangements that limit the
circumstances under which such benefits would be provided such
that the change of control protection is limited to
circumstances where the employee has suffered a significant and
adverse change in the particular terms of the employees
employment. In addition, Phelps Dodge is seeking to put in place
similar amendments with respect to other employees subject to
the agreements described below. Such benefits, and the
amendments to the scope of such benefits, referenced above are
described in more detail below.
Change of Control Agreements. Phelps Dodge has Change of
Control Agreements with its named executive officers and other
members of its senior management team (the Senior Change
of Control Agreements), pursuant to which each executive,
in the event the executive is terminated by Phelps Dodge without
Cause or voluntarily terminates employment for
Good Reason (as each term is defined in the Senior
Change of Control Agreements), will receive a lump sum equal to
three times the executives highest base salary during that
year and the prior two years, plus three times the
executives target bonus calculated using the highest base
salary and target bonus percentage for the immediately preceding
12 months, less any severance pay otherwise payable under
our otherwise applicable plans and programs. The Senior Change
of Control Agreements also provide these executives with a
30-day window period
beginning on the first anniversary date of the change of control
in which they may voluntarily terminate their employment and
still receive their change of control benefits (a Window
Period Termination). As is described below, our named
executive officers have agreed with us that the Window Period
Termination would not be applicable in the context of the
acquisition of Inco. Those with Senior Change of Control
Agreements also receive a tax
gross-up payment in
respect of any excise taxes triggered by the change of control
benefits; the cost of three years of insured group medical,
dental, vision, life insurance and long-term disability plans;
the cost of continuing executive physicals and financial
counseling services for a similarly limited period; and
outplacement services at a cost up to a maximum amount of 15% of
their base salary.
A second group of key management personnel receive similar
Change of Control Agreements that provide a lump sum benefit
equal to two times the executives highest base salary
during that year and the prior two years, plus two times the
executives target bonus calculated using the highest base
salary and target bonus percentage for the immediately preceding
12 months less any severance pay otherwise payable under
our otherwise applicable plans and programs. Phelps Dodge will
also pay the cost of the group benefits outlined above for a
period of two years. However, these agreements do not include a
30-day termination
window, nor are the executives eligible for a tax
gross-up payment unless
the benefits payable due to a change of control are at least
120% of the allowable cap. All of the other material terms and
conditions are substantially the same as those included in the
Senior Change of Control Agreements.
Stock Option and Restricted Stock Award Agreements. Stock
options granted by Phelps Dodge under its Stock Option
Agreements become exercisable (but not earlier than six months
from the date of grant) for a period of 30 days following a
change of control and, in the case of the five named executive
officers and certain other key employees, the date of a
termination of employment for a reason other than death,
disability, for cause or, under certain circumstances, a
voluntary termination of employment by the executive if such
termination occurs within two years following a change of
control. In addition, restricted shares awarded by Phelps Dodge
pursuant to Award of Restricted Stock Agreements and held for at
least six months vest in connection with a change of control. As
is described below, our named executive officers have agreed
with us that their options and restricted stock will not become
vested solely on
58
account of the acquisition of Inco. However, in the event that
any such officers employment is terminated within two
years of the closing of such transaction by us without Cause or
by the officer for Good Reason, such options and
restricted shares will become vested in connection with the
executives termination of employment.
Other Executive Change of Control Provisions. The Phelps
Dodge Corporation Supplemental Retirement Plan provides for an
additional 36 months of service credit, as well as the
payment of unreduced benefits under liberalized age and length
of service requirements, as well as, to certain executives, if
such an executive is terminated from employment within two years
following a change of control. In addition, the Phelps Dodge
Corporation Supplemental Savings Plan obligates Phelps Dodge to
transfer an amount equal to the deficiency in the assets of the
Plans trust fund, if any, prior to the day on which a
change of control occurs. While the Inco transaction is a change
of control for purposes of triggering this funding requirement,
the trust is currently fully funded and no additional
contribution to the trust is expected to be required because of
the anticipated change of control.
Amendments. As referenced above, on June 24, 2006
Phelps Dodge and each of its named executive officers entered
into certain amendments to the respective Senior Change of
Control Agreements, Stock Option Agreements and Award of
Restricted Stock Agreements applicable to each such named
executive officer. The purpose of these amendments was to reduce
the circumstances under which an affected executive would be
entitled to additional benefits as a result of the transaction
with Inco. Our objective was to limit the special change of
control protection available to any such executive to those
circumstances in which such executive suffers a substantial and
adverse change in the particular terms and conditions of the
executives employment within a two-year period following
the Inco transaction. Accordingly, in certain circumstances, our
executives can receive enhanced benefits following the Inco
transaction. Given the scope of this transaction, we believe
that, if an executives particular terms and conditions of
employment are adversely affected by the synergies that are
expected to be derived from the business combination, such
additional rights are appropriate. As a result of the
amendments, the potential cost associated with the applicable
change of control provisions will be reduced substantially from
that which would have applied under the amended plans, programs
and agreements prior to such amendments. We currently expect
that the number of our officers and other executives who will
actually receive additional benefits in connection with the Inco
transaction by reason of the modified change of control
provisions will be limited to a modest percentage of the total
number of officers and executives to whom such protection
applies.
The amendments, which apply only in respect of the Inco
transaction, (i) eliminate the right of an executive who is
a party to a Senior Change of Control Agreement to receive
severance and other termination benefits upon a Window Period
Termination, (ii) provide that unvested options and
unvested restricted shares will not become vested solely upon
the consummation of the Inco transaction, (iii) provide, as
a substitute for full acceleration, a conditional vesting
provision under the Award of Restricted Stock Agreements, which
is generally consistent with the double-trigger
vesting currently applicable under the Option Agreements (as
modified by the amendments), under which such shares would
become fully-vested upon an executives termination of
employment without Cause or for Good
Reason within two years following a change of control, and
(iv) limit the definition of Good Reason
included in the Senior Change of Control Agreements, Stock
Option Agreements and Award of Restricted Stock Agreements
principally to those events previously included within the
definition of Good Reason that related to the executives
particular terms and conditions of employment (for example, a
change in our benefits plans generally applicable to all
similarly situated employees would not constitute Good Reason
following the Inco transaction). In consideration of these
modifications, the requirement that options or restricted shares
be granted at least six months prior to a change of control to
be eligible for the benefit of the special change of control
protection has been eliminated for purposes of this transaction.
One of our key executives, Arthur R. Miele, is retiring at the
end of the year, and had already announced his intention to
retire prior to the execution of the combination agreement with
Inco. Mr. Miele has agreed with us that, because of this
announced intention, it would not be appropriate to provide him
with any additional rights under his Senior Change of Control
Agreement due to this transaction. Accordingly, he has agreed
that consummation of the transaction will not be deemed a
59
Change of Control for purposes of his Senior Change
of Control Agreement. With regard to his equity awards,
Mr. Miele has entered into the amendments described above
with respect to our other executive officers.
Accounting Treatment of the Combination
Upon completion of the combination with Inco, the
pre-combination shareholders of Phelps Dodge will own
approximately 57% of the combined company and the
pre-combination shareholders of Inco will own approximately 43%
of the combined company. In addition to considering these
relative shareholdings, the company also considered the proposed
composition and terms of the board of directors, the proposed
structure and members of the executive management team of Phelps
Dodge Inco, and the premium paid by Phelps Dodge to acquire
Inco, in determining the accounting acquirer. Based on the
weight of these factors, the company concluded that Phelps Dodge
will be the accounting acquirer.
In accordance with U.S. GAAP, Phelps Dodge will account for
the combination using the purchase method of accounting.
Accordingly, the assets and liabilities of Inco will be recorded
by Phelps Dodge at their respective fair values at the time of
the combination. The excess of Phelps Dodges purchase
price over the fair value of assets acquired, including
identifiable intangible assets, and liabilities assumed will be
recorded as goodwill. Phelps Dodge will record amortization
expense over the useful lives of amortizable intangible assets
acquired in connection with the combination.
Goodwill will be periodically assessed for impairment but not
less frequently than on an annual basis. To the extent that
goodwill becomes impaired, Phelps Dodge may be required to
record material charges relating to the impairment of that
asset. Any such charges could have a material impact on the
carrying value of the combined companys assets and the
combined companys results of operations. Long-lived
depreciable assets recorded at fair value pursuant to purchase
accounting will be depreciated, depleted or amortized over their
respective useful lives and will be evaluated for impairment
when events or changes in economic circumstances indicate the
carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. Metal
inventories recorded at fair value pursuant to purchase
accounting will be subject to periodic assessments for
lower-of-cost-or-market adjustments. To the extent that market
values fall below carrying values in future reporting periods,
the combined company may be required to record material charges
relating to such adjustments.
Regulatory Matters Related to the Combination
HSR Act. On July 12, 2006, we received from the U.S.
Department of Justice notification of early termination of the
waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust
Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, which we refer to as the
HSR Act.
Competition Act (Canada). On July 25, 2006, we
received, under the combination agreement, the completion of the
combination is conditional upon receipt of an advance ruling
certificate under the Competition Act (Canada).
Investment Canada Act (Canada). The combination of Phelps
Dodge with Inco is subject to the requirements of the Investment
Canada Act, which prevents us from completing the combination
until we receive the requisite approval, actual or deemed, from
the Minister of Industry. We filed an Application for Review
with the Investment Review Division of Industry Canada on
July 6, 2006. On August 21, 2006, the Minister of
Industry extended the review of our application for an
additional 30 day period as permitted under the Investment
Canada Act.
EC Merger Regulation Filing. The combination is
subject to the requirements of Council Regulation
(EC) 139/2004 of 20 January 2004, which we refer to as the
Council Regulation, which prevents us from completing the
combination until we furnish required information and materials
to the European Commission, and the European Commission issues a
clearance decision or the applicable waiting period expires. We
filed the Form CO Merger Notification pursuant to the
Council Regulation with the European Commission on
August 1, 2006.
60
The U.S. Department of Justice, the Federal Trade Commission or
the European Commission may challenge the combination on
antitrust grounds either before or after expiration or
termination of the waiting period. Accordingly, at any time
before or after the completion of the combination, any of the
U.S. Department of Justice, the Federal Trade Commission or
the European Commission could take action under the antitrust
laws as it deems necessary or desirable in the public interest,
including without limitation seeking to enjoin the completion of
the combination or permitting completion subject to regulatory
concessions or conditions. We cannot assure you that a challenge
to the combination will not be made or that, if a challenge is
made, it will not succeed.
Indonesian Capital Markets Regulation. PT Inco, a 60.8%
majority owned subsidiary of Inco, is a public Indonesian
company with its shares listed on the Jakarta Stock Exchange. An
Indonesian capital markets regulation targeting indirect
acquisitions requires that, in certain circumstances, a new
controlling party of a public Indonesian company must make a
tender offer to the other shareholders of the company. One of PT
Incos shareholders has publicly claimed that the
combination will result in the creation of a new controlling
party in respect of PT Inco, therefore requiring Phelps Dodge to
make a tender offer for the shares of PT Inco not owned by Inco.
While Inco and Phelps Dodge believe that Phelps Dodge would not
be required to undertake a tender offer under the terms of the
relevant Indonesian capital markets regulation, shareholders of
PT Inco could take legal action to compel such a tender offer
and it is possible that an order to this effect might be
granted. Of the shares of PT Inco not held by Inco,
approximately 18% are held by the public, 20.1% are held by
Sumitomo Metal Mining Co. Ltd, and the remainder are held by a
number of other small shareholders.
Fees, Costs and Expenses
All expenses incurred in connection with the combination
agreement and the transactions contemplated by the combination
agreement will be paid by the party incurring those expenses,
except in specified circumstances in which reimbursement or
sharing of expenses may be required by the combination
agreement. The circumstances in which reimbursement of expenses
may be required are described under The Combination
Agreement Fees and Expenses and The
Combination Agreement Termination Fees and
Expenses beginning on page 81 and 79,
respectively, of this proxy statement.
No Dissenters Rights
Under the New York Business Corporation Law, shareholders who
dissent with respect to any matters to be acted upon pursuant to
this proxy statement will not have any rights of appraisal or
similar rights.
Repurchase of Phelps Dodge Common Stock
Subject to applicable law, we may, at various times as price and
market conditions warrant, repurchase our common shares. At the
time the proposed combination was announced, we announced that
our board of directors had approved a share repurchase
authorization of up to $5 billion of shares (inclusive of
the remaining amounts available under Phelps Dodges
existing capital return program). Regulation M under the
federal securities laws prohibits Phelps Dodge from bidding for
or repurchasing its common shares during certain
restricted periods. As such, we will not repurchase
any of our common shares under this share repurchase program or
Phelps Dodges existing capital return program until the
combination is completed.
New York Stock Exchange Listing; Delisting and Deregistration
of Inco Common Shares
It is a condition to the combination that the shares of our
common stock issuable in the combination be approved for listing
on the New York Stock Exchange and the Toronto Stock Exchange,
subject to official notice of issuance and the satisfaction of
certain other customary conditions. If the combination is
completed, Inco common shares will cease to be listed on the New
York Stock Exchange and the Toronto
61
Stock Exchange. In addition, after the completion of the
combination, (i) Phelps Dodge will become a reporting
issuer in certain provinces of Canada and will be subject to
ongoing Statutory Financial and other reporting requirements of
applicable Canadian Securities laws, and (ii) Inco may
cease to be subject to the public reporting and proxy
solicitation requirements of the CBCA and the securities laws
and various securities regulations of Canada and the United
States or may request to cease to be a reporting issuer under
the securities laws of one or more of such jurisdictions.
62
INFORMATION ABOUT THE SPECIAL MEETING
Time, Date and Place
This proxy statement is furnished in connection with the
solicitation of proxies by Phelps Dodges board of
directors for use at the special meeting. The special meeting
will be held on September 25, 2006, at 9:00 a.m.
(MST), at The Heard Museum, 2301 North Central Avenue,
Phoenix, Arizona.
Purpose
The purpose of the meeting is to:
|
|
|
1. consider and vote on the charter amendment proposal
pursuant to which Phelps Dodges restated certificate of
incorporation would be amended and restated to (i) change
the companys name to Phelps Dodge Inco Corporation from
Phelps Dodge Corporation, (ii) increase the number of
authorized shares of Phelps Dodge common stock from
300 million to 800 million shares and
(iii) increase the maximum number of members of Phelps
Dodges board of directors from 12 to 15; |
|
|
2. consider and vote on the share issuance proposal
pursuant to which shares of Phelps Dodge common stock would be
authorized for issuance to Inco securityholders in connection
with the combination of Phelps Dodge with Inco; |
|
|
|
3. in the event that there are not sufficient votes for
approval of the charter amendment proposal at the special
meeting, to consider and vote upon any proposal to postpone or
adjourn the special meeting to a later date to solicit
additional proxies with respect to such proposal; |
|
|
|
|
4. in the event that there are not sufficient votes for
approval of the share issuance proposal at the special meeting,
to consider and vote upon any proposal to postpone or adjourn
the special meeting to a later date to solicit additional
proxies with respect to such proposal; and |
|
|
|
|
5. to conduct any other business as may be properly brought
before the special meeting. |
|
Record Date and Shares Entitled to Vote
Only holders of record of Phelps Dodge common stock at the close
of business on August 24, 2006, which we refer to as the
record date, are entitled to notice of and to vote at the
special meeting. As of that date, there
were l shares
of Phelps Dodge common stock issued and outstanding. Holders of
record of Phelps Dodge common stock on the record date are
entitled to one vote per share on any matter that may properly
come before the special meeting.
Your shares may be voted at the meeting only if you are present
or represented by a valid proxy.
Vote Required; Security Ownership of Management
Approval of the charter amendment proposal
requires: the affirmative vote of the holders of a
majority of our outstanding common shares entitled to vote.
Approval of the share issuance proposal requires:
the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of our common
shares voting on the proposal, so long as the total vote cast on
the proposal represents a majority of our common shares
outstanding.
Approval of the charter amendment adjournment proposal
requires: the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority
of our common shares voting on the proposal.
Approval of the share issuance adjournment proposal requires:
the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of our
common shares voting on the proposal.
If you hold your shares of Phelps Dodge common stock in
street name and do not provide your broker, bank or
other nominee with instructions on how to vote your shares, your
broker, bank or other nominee will not be permitted to vote your
shares on the charter amendment proposal, the share issuance
proposal, the charter amendment adjournment proposal or the
share issuance adjournment proposal. Shares not voted in favor
of the charter amendment proposal will have the effect of a vote
against that
63
proposal. Since your vote is important, you should therefore
be sure to provide your broker, bank or other nominee with
instructions on how to vote your shares.
As of the record date, the executive officers and directors of
Phelps Dodge and their affiliates beneficially owned in the
aggregate approximately 707,201 shares of common stock, or
less than 1% of the Phelps Dodge common stock then outstanding.
All of the executive officers and directors of Phelps Dodge have
advised us that they intend to vote their shares of Phelps Dodge
common stock to approve the charter amendment proposal and the
share issuance proposal.
Solicitation and Revocation of Proxies
A form of proxy for the special meeting is enclosed with this
proxy statement. All shares of common stock held of record as of
the record date represented by properly executed proxies will,
unless such proxies have been previously revoked, be voted in
accordance with the instructions indicated on such proxies.
The board of directors is not aware of any other matters that
may be presented for action at the special meeting, but if other
matters do come properly before the special meeting it is
intended that shares of Phelps Dodge common stock represented by
proxies in the accompanying form will be voted by the persons
named in the proxy in accordance with their best judgment.
A shareholder of record may revoke a proxy by:
(a) delivering to Phelps Dodge written notice of
revocation, (b) delivering to Phelps Dodge a proxy signed
on a later date or (c) appearing at the special meeting and
voting in person. If your shares of Phelps Dodge common stock
are held in street name by a broker or bank, you
should contact your broker or bank if you wish to revoke your
proxy. The cost of soliciting proxies from shareholders will be
borne by Phelps Dodge. Proxies may be solicited by personal
interview, mail and telephone by certain of our executive
officers, directors and regular employees, without additional
compensation. In addition, we may reimburse brokerage firms and
other persons representing beneficial owners of Phelps Dodge
stock for their expenses in forwarding solicitation material to
beneficial owners.
Unanimous Recommendation of Phelps Dodges Board of
Directors
The board of directors unanimously recommends that you vote
FOR the charter amendment proposal, FOR
the share issuance proposal, FOR the charter
amendment adjournment proposal and FOR the share
issuance adjournment proposal.
Quorum
Holders of at least a majority of our outstanding common stock
as of the close of business on the record date who are entitled
to vote must be present or represented by proxy in order to
constitute a quorum to conduct business at the special meeting
under our corporate by-laws. However, regardless of corporate
quorum requirements, under New York Stock Exchange rules for
purposes of the vote on the share issuance proposal, at least
50% of our outstanding shares must have been voted. A list
of eligible shareholders of record will be available at the
special meeting. Presence at the special meeting may be in
person or by proxy. You will be considered part of the quorum if
you return a signed and dated proxy card, if you vote by
telephone or the Internet, or if you vote in person at the
special meeting.
How to Vote
All shares represented by proxies will be voted by one or more
of the persons designated on the enclosed proxy card in
accordance with the instructions indicated on the proxy card. If
the proxy card is signed and returned without specific
directions with respect to the matters to be acted upon, the
shares will be voted in accordance with the recommendation of
the board of directors. A shareholder of record giving a proxy
may revoke it at any time before such proxy is voted at the
meeting by giving written notice
64
of revocation to the Assistant General Counsel and Secretary of
Phelps Dodge, by submitting a later-dated proxy, or by attending
the meeting and voting in person. Shareholders holding shares of
Phelps Dodge common stock in street name through a
broker or bank, should contact their broker or bank for
instructions on how to revoke their proxies.
Instead of submitting a signed proxy card, shareholders may
submit their proxies by telephone or through the Internet using
the instructions accompanying the proxy card. Telephone and
Internet proxies must be used in conjunction with, and will be
subject to, the information and terms contained on the proxy
card. Similar procedures may also be available to shareholders
who hold their shares through a broker, nominee, fiduciary or
other custodian.
Where the shareholder is not the record holder, such as where
the shares are held through a broker, nominee, fiduciary or
other custodian, the shareholder must provide voting
instructions to the record holder of the shares in accordance
with the record holders requirements in order to ensure
the shares are properly voted.
If you participate in the Mellon Investor Services L.L.C.
Investor Services Program for Phelps Dodge shareholders, all
common shares held for your account under that plan will be
voted in accordance with your proxy.
To Attend the Special Meeting
Each shareholder will be asked to present valid picture
identification. Shareholders holding stock in brokerage accounts
will need to bring evidence of their stock ownership as of the
August 24, 2006 record date (for example, a copy of a
brokerage statement).
Expenses of Soliciting
The cost of soliciting proxies will be borne by Phelps Dodge.
Directors, officers, agents and employees of Phelps Dodge and
its subsidiaries and other solicitors retained by Phelps Dodge
may, by letter, by telephone or in person, make additional
requests for the return of proxies and may receive proxies on
our behalf. Brokers, nominees, fiduciaries and other custodians
will be requested to forward soliciting material to the
beneficial owners of shares and will be reimbursed for their
expenses.
Phelps Dodge has retained D.F. King & Co., Inc. to
assist and to provide advisory services in connection with this
proxy statement for which it will receive a fee estimated not to
exceed $300,000 and will be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses.
Phelps Dodge will indemnify D.F. King & Co., Inc.
against certain liabilities and expenses in connection with the
proxy solicitation, including liabilities under the federal
securities laws.
Questions About Voting Your Shares
If you have questions or need assistance voting your shares, or
need additional copies of the proxy materials, you should
contact D.F. King & Co., Inc., by mail
at 48 Wall Street, New York, NY 10005, or by
(toll-free) telephone at
1-800-659-5550 (U.S.
and Canada). Non-US or
non-Canadian investors may call D.F. King at
+44 20 7920 9700.
Your vote is important, regardless of the number of shares of
Phelps Dodge common stock you own. Remember, failure to vote on
the charter amendment proposal will have the same effect as a
vote against such proposal. Please complete, sign,
date and mail your proxy card or submit your proxy and/or voting
instructions by telephone or through the Internet promptly.
65
THE COMBINATION AGREEMENT
The following is a summary of selected terms of the combination
agreement, as amended by the waiver and first amendment, and the
exhibits thereto, which constitute an integral part of the
combination agreement. Although Phelps Dodge believes that this
description includes the material terms of the combination
agreement, as amended, it may not contain all of the information
that is important to you and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to the combination agreement and the waiver and first
amendment, each of which is incorporated by reference in its
entirety into, and is attached as Annex A and Annex E,
respectively, to this proxy statement. We urge you to read the
full text of the combination agreements, as amended, because the
rights and obligations of the parties are governed by the terms
of the combination agreements, as amended, and not by this
summary or other information contained in this proxy statement.
Unless otherwise indicated, references to combination
agreement are to the combination agreement, as amended by
the waiver and first amendment. For purposes of the following
discussion, provisions of the combination agreement that relate
solely to the now terminated Falconbridge acquisition have been
omitted and the discussion focuses on the terms of the
combination agreement relevant to the combination of Phelps
Dodge with Inco only.
Except for the combination agreements status as a
contractual document that establishes and governs the legal
relations among the parties thereto with respect to the
combination, its text is not intended to be, and should not be
interpreted as, a source of factual, business or operational
information about Phelps Dodge or Inco, or any of their
respective affiliates. The combination agreement contains
representations, warranties and covenants that are qualified and
limited, including by information in the schedules referenced in
the combination agreement that the parties delivered in
connection with the execution of the combination agreement,
certain other information provided by Inco or Phelps Dodge to
the other party, or disclosed on or after January 1, 2004,
in public filings with, in the case of Phelps Dodge, the
Securities and Exchange Commission and, in the case of Inco, the
Ontario Securities Commission. Representations and warranties
may be used as a tool to allocate risks between the respective
parties to the combination agreement, including where the
parties do not have complete knowledge of all facts, instead of
establishing such matters as facts. Furthermore, the
representations and warranties may be subject to different
standards of materiality applicable to the contracting parties,
which may differ from what may be viewed as material to
shareholders. These representations may or may not have been
accurate as of any specific date and do not purport to be
accurate as of the date of this proxy statement. Moreover,
information concerning the subject matter of the representations
and warranties may have changed since the date of the
combination agreement and subsequent developments or new
information qualifying a representation or warranty may have
been included in this proxy statement. Except for the parties
themselves, under the terms of the combination agreement only
certain other specifically identified persons are third-party
beneficiaries of the combination agreement who may enforce it
and rely on its terms. As shareholders, you are not third-party
beneficiaries of the combination agreement and therefore may not
directly enforce or rely upon its terms and conditions and you
should not rely on its representations, warranties or covenants
as characterizations of the actual state of facts or condition
of Phelps Dodge or Inco, or any of their respective
affiliates.
Closing and Effective Time
The closing of the combination will take place on the second
business day after the date on which all closing conditions have
been satisfied or waived (subject to applicable laws and other
than any conditions which by their terms cannot be satisfied
until the closing date, but subject to the satisfaction or,
where permitted, waiver of those conditions as of the closing
date) or another time as agreed to in writing by Phelps Dodge
and Inco. We currently expect to complete the combination in
September 2006. The combination transaction will be
effective at 12:01 a.m. (Toronto time) on the date shown on
the certificate of arrangement issued under the Canada Business
Corporation Act, or the CBCA, which will give effect to the
combination. We refer to this time as the effective time.
66
Combination Consideration
Treatment of Inco Common Shares. At the effective time,
each Inco common share issued and outstanding immediately prior
to the effective time (other than Inco restricted common shares,
shares held by a holder who has validly exercised such
holders dissent rights under the Plan of Arrangement or
shares held by Phelps Dodge or any of its subsidiaries) will be
transferred to Phelps Dodge Canada Inc. in exchange for the
right to receive 0.672 shares of Phelps Dodge common stock
and Cdn.$20.25 cash (or, at the Inco holders option, the
U.S. dollar equivalent).
At the effective time, each Inco common share held by Phelps
Dodge or a Phelps Dodge subsidiary will be canceled, without any
consideration being paid for it.
Inco Restricted Shares and Stock Options. Each restricted
Inco common share granted under Incos 2001 Key Executive
Incentive Plan and its 2005 Key Executive Incentive Plan
outstanding immediately prior to the effective time, will be
exchanged for a number of shares of Phelps Dodge common stock
(on the same terms and conditions as were applicable prior to
the effective time to such Inco restricted share pursuant to the
relevant incentive plan under which it was issued and the
agreement evidencing the grant thereof) equal to:
As of June 16, 2006, there were approximately
155,931 restricted Inco common shares awarded and
outstanding pursuant to the incentive plans.
Each outstanding option to acquire Inco common shares issued
under Incos incentive plans, whether or not vested, will
be exchanged for a fully vested option granted by Phelps Dodge
to acquire (on the same terms and conditions, other than
vesting, as were applicable to such option under the relevant
Inco incentive plan under which such option was issued) a
specified number of shares of Phelps Dodge common stock (rounded
down to the nearest whole number), as follows:
67
at an exercise price (rounded up to the nearest Cdn.$0.0001),
expressed in U.S. dollars, equal to:
The exercise price set forth above may be increased to ensure
that, immediately after the exchange, the amount by which the
fair market value of a share of Phelps Dodge common stock
exceeds the exercise price of the newly-issued Phelps Dodge
option is equal to the amount by which, immediately before the
exchange, the fair market value of an Inco common share exceeded
the exercise price of the Inco option subject to the exchange.
If an Inco option includes an Inco stock appreciation right
(SAR), the Phelps Dodge option for which such Inco
option is exchanged will include a SAR subject to the same terms
and conditions, other than vesting, as were applicable to the
Inco SAR except that the Phelps Dodge SAR, which may be
exercised in lieu of but not in addition to such Phelps Dodge
option, will represent the right to receive, upon exercise, the
number of shares of Phelps Dodge common stock (rounded down to
the nearest whole share), or an equivalent amount of cash or a
combination of Phelps Dodge common stock and cash, at Phelps
Dodges option, with an aggregate fair market value on the
date of exercise equal to the positive difference between
(a) the aggregate fair market value of the shares of Phelps
Dodge common stock subject to the corresponding Phelps Dodge
option and (b) the aggregate Phelps Dodge option exercise
price.
The conversion mechanisms relating to the Inco options and SARs
are also subject to adjustments required to comply with
Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended, and the rules, regulations and guidance promulgated
thereunder.
As of June 16, 2006, there were outstanding options to
acquire approximately 1,780,539 Inco common shares and 715,300
Inco SARs outstanding.
Current shareholders of Inco are expected to own approximately
43% of Phelps Dodges outstanding common shares after the
combination.
Representations and Warranties
The combination agreement contains a number of customary
representations and warranties of Phelps Dodge and Inco, in some
cases subject to certain exceptions or qualifications contained
in the combination agreement, the disclosure schedules delivered
in connection therewith, certain other information provided by
Inco or Phelps Dodge to the other party, or disclosed on or
after January 1, 2004, in public filings with, in the case
of Phelps Dodge, the Securities and Exchange Commission and, in
the case of Inco, the Ontario Securities Commission, and
relating to, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
due organization, valid existence, good standing, qualification
and power and authority to operate its respective business; |
|
|
|
ownership of subsidiaries; |
68
|
|
|
|
|
no violations of organizational documents; |
|
|
|
capitalization and capital structure; |
|
|
|
the corporate authorization and enforceability of, and board
approval of, the combination agreement and the combination; |
|
|
|
the absence of conflicts with or breaches or violations of,
organizational documents, applicable law, material contracts or
licenses in connection with performance under the combination
agreement as a result of entering into the combination agreement
or consummating the combination; |
|
|
|
compliance with laws, permits, contracts and stock exchange
requirements; |
|
|
|
the material accuracy of (i) reports required to be filed
with Canadian securities regulatory authorities and the Toronto
Stock Exchange, in the case of Inco, and with the Securities and
Exchange Commission and the New York Stock Exchange, in the case
of Phelps Dodge, since January 1, 2004, and (ii) the
financial statements included in those reports; |
|
|
|
the design and maintenance of disclosure controls and procedures; |
|
|
|
absence of undisclosed liabilities; |
|
|
|
absence of any litigation, claims, complaints or other similar
actions which, if determined adversely, have had or would
reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect; |
|
|
|
employee plans; |
|
|
|
labor matters; |
|
|
|
rights with respect to real and operating property; |
|
|
|
mining and other operations; |
|
|
|
mineral reserves and resources; |
|
|
|
insurance; |
|
|
|
taxes; |
|
|
|
environmental matters; |
|
|
|
intellectual property; |
|
|
|
material contracts; |
|
|
|
brokers and finders fees; |
|
|
|
the securityholder votes required to approve, in the case of
Inco, the Plan of Arrangement and, in the case of Phelps Dodge,
the restated certificate of incorporation and the authorization
and issuance of its shares of common stock to be issued in
connection with the combination; and |
|
|
|
the absence of any material adverse effect and certain other
material changes or events since December 31, 2005. |
In addition to the representations and warranties described
above, Inco makes representations and warranties relating to:
|
|
|
|
|
the opinion of each of its financial advisors; and |
|
|
|
the support agreement contracts in connection with the
Falconbridge acquisition. |
Phelps Dodge makes representations and warranties relating to
the due and valid issuance of the Phelps Dodge common stock
issued in connection with the combination.
The representations and warranties of each of Inco and Phelps
Dodge in the combination agreement will terminate at the
effective time.
69
Material Adverse Effect. Numerous representations and
covenants contained in the combination agreement are qualified
by the absence of a material adverse effect. Under
the combination agreement, material adverse effect
means, with respect to each party, any fact, change, event,
occurrence or effect that is or would reasonably be expected to
be materially adverse to:
|
|
|
|
|
the condition (financial or otherwise) of properties, assets,
liabilities, obligations, businesses, operations or results of
operations of that party and its subsidiaries and material joint
ventures, taken as a whole, or |
|
|
|
the ability of that party to consummate the combination. |
However, a material adverse effect will not have occurred in the
case of any fact, change, event, occurrence or effect relating
to:
|
|
|
|
|
the announcement of the execution of the combination agreement
or the combination; |
|
|
|
changes, circumstances or conditions generally affecting the
mining industry that do not have a materially disproportionate
effect on the applicable party; |
|
|
|
changes in general economic conditions in the United States or
Canada; |
|
|
|
changes in any of the principal markets served by the applicable
partys business generally; |
|
|
|
shortages or price changes with respect to raw materials, metals
or other products (including, but not limited to, copper,
nickel, cobalt, molybdenum, any platinum-group metals, sulfur,
sulphuric acid, electricity, zinc or aluminum) used or sold by
that party; |
|
|
|
changes in generally applicable laws or regulations (other than
orders, judgments or decrees against the applicable party or any
of its subsidiaries or material joint ventures); |
|
|
|
changes in United States or Canadian generally accepted
accounting principles; or |
|
|
|
a change in the trading prices of the applicable partys
equity securities or a failure by any party to reach any
internal or published projections, forecasts or revenue, synergy
or earnings predictions, although the events underlying such a
change may constitute a material adverse effect. |
Covenants
Conduct of Business. Each of Inco and Phelps Dodge has
agreed that, pending the consummation of the combination, except
as expressly contemplated by the combination agreement or with
the other partys prior written consent, which is not to be
unreasonably withheld or denied, it and each of its respective
subsidiaries will conduct its business in the ordinary course
and consistent with past practice and in compliance with all
applicable laws and use its commercially reasonable efforts to
preserve its business structure and relationships, and will not
do any of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
amend its governing documents; |
|
|
|
split, combine, subdivide or reclassify its capital stock, pay
any dividend or make any distribution or redeem, repurchase or
otherwise acquire any of its securities, subject to certain
exceptions such as dividends in the ordinary course of business
or, in the case of Inco, paid by wholly owned subsidiaries to
Inco or another subsidiary or paid by non-wholly owned
subsidiaries in the ordinary course, or, in the case of Phelps
Dodge, paid by a subsidiary to Phelps Dodge or another
subsidiary; |
|
|
|
adopt any complete or partial plan of liquidation, dissolution,
winding up, merger, consolidation, amalgamation, restructuring,
recapitalization or other material reorganization (other than a
merger or consolidation between wholly owned subsidiaries); |
|
|
|
issue, deliver or sell equity securities, or securities
convertible into or exchangeable for equity securities, subject
to specified exceptions such as the exercise or granting of
stock options in the ordinary course or conversion of
convertible securities outstanding on the date of the initial
combination agreement or as permitted by the combination
agreement; |
70
|
|
|
|
|
except as required to ensure that any employee plans comply with
applicable law or as specifically required or permitted by the
combination agreement or, in the case of Inco, required in
connection with the termination of its Non-Employee Director
Share Ownership Plan or the payment of any amount to the holders
of deferred share units issued under such plan in consideration
for the cancellation of such deferred share units: |
|
|
|
|
|
adopt, enter into, terminate or amend any employee plan, other
than in the ordinary course of business consistent with past
practice; |
|
|
|
increase the compensation or benefits of, or pay any bonus to,
any employee (including employees of subsidiaries), except for
increases in base salary or payments of bonuses in the ordinary
course of business consistent with past practice, as required to
comply with any employee plan in effect on the date of the
initial combination agreement, or in 2007 in connection with
annual performance assessments consistent with past practice; |
|
|
|
pay or provide to any employee (including employees of
subsidiaries) any benefit not provided for under an employee
plan already in effect on the date of the initial combination
agreement, other than the payment of base compensation in the
ordinary course of business consistent with prior practice or as
otherwise provided in the combination agreement; |
|
|
|
except to the extent expressly permitted under the combination
agreement, grant any awards under any employee plan (including
the grant of rights and awards in connection with stock or
equity) or remove existing restrictions in any employee plan or
awards; |
|
|
|
take any action to fund or in any other way secure the payment
of compensation or benefits under any employee plan, except as
required to comply with any employee plan as in effect on the
date of the initial combination agreement; or |
|
|
|
take any action to accelerate the vesting or payment of any
compensation or benefits under any employee plan; |
|
|
|
|
|
acquire any material business; |
|
|
|
sell or otherwise transfer or encumber any material assets or
material rights, other than under current contracts or ordinary
course sales of inventory; |
|
|
|
incur, assume or guarantee any indebtedness for borrowed money
or issue or sell any debt securities or enter into any keep-well
or other arrangements to maintain the financial condition of
another person, other than short-term borrowings in the ordinary
course consistent with past practices; |
|
|
|
make any loan, advance or capital contribution, subject to
specified exceptions such as loans to subsidiaries, under
contracts currently in effect or otherwise in the ordinary
course of business to the extent not material individually or in
the aggregate; |
|
|
|
change its methods of accounting or accounting practices in any
material respect, or its fiscal year, except as required by law
or applicable generally accepted accounting principles; |
|
|
|
take any action that would or reasonably would be expected to
prevent or materially impair or delay the ability to consummate
the combination transaction; or |
|
|
|
agree or commit to do any of the foregoing. |
Inco has also agreed that it will not:
|
|
|
|
|
file any registration statement or amendment to a registration
statement under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. |
Special Meetings of the Shareholders. Subject to the
terms and conditions of the combination agreement, each of
Phelps Dodge and Inco will use its reasonable best efforts to
cause a special meeting of its shareholders to be held as soon
as reasonably practicable. The Inco special meeting is to be
called and held in accordance with the Interim Order and the
CBCA for the purpose of considering the
71
arrangement and other matters relating to the arrangement and
the combination agreement. The Phelps Dodge special meeting is
to be called and held for the purpose of considering the
proposed amendment and restatement of Phelps Dodges
certificate of incorporation and the proposed issuance of Phelps
Dodge common stock to be issued in connection with the
combination. Each of Phelps Dodge and Inco have agreed to
finalize all notices, filings, solicitations and informational
statements to be provided to its shareholders, secure necessary
governmental approvals for such solicitations and informational
statements, and mail such solicitations and informational
statements to its shareholders. Inco may, however, postpone its
shareholders meeting to the extent that its outside legal
advisor advises Inco that it would be appropriate to do so for
the purpose of allowing the Inco shareholders to review any
additional disclosure that Inco, with the advice of its outside
counsel, determines in good faith is advisable and should be
made available to Inco shareholders in a supplemental management
information circular or otherwise. Inco is not required to hold
its shareholder meeting until Inco counsel has had reasonable
opportunity to review comments of the Securities and Exchange
Commission relating to this proxy statement or has been advised
in writing that there are no such comments.
Inco has agreed, subject to the terms and conditions of the
combination agreement, to take all lawful actions to solicit the
approval of the Plan of Arrangement from its shareholders and to
recommend such approval to its shareholders.
Phelps Dodge has agreed, subject to the terms and conditions of
the combination agreement, to take all lawful actions to solicit
the approval of (a) the authorization and issuance of the
Phelps Dodge common stock to be issued in connection with the
combination and (b) the restated certificate of
incorporation of Phelps Dodge required under the combination
agreement, and to recommend such approvals to its shareholders.
In the case of each such approval, each of Inco and Phelps Dodge
have agreed not to withdraw, modify or qualify (or publicly
propose to or publicly state that it intends to withdraw, modify
or qualify) in any manner adverse to the other party such
recommendation, except as provided in the combination agreement
and as summarized in the following paragraph and, in the case of
Inco, under Acquisition Proposals beginning on
page 72 of this proxy statement.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, each of the Phelps Dodge and Inco
board of directors may withdraw, modify or qualify its
respective recommendation to its shareholders if, after
consultation with outside legal counsel, it determines that
failure to do so would be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties
under applicable law. Upon such a withdrawal, modification or
qualification, Inco or Phelps Dodge, as applicable, may solicit
votes of its shareholders consistent with the withdrawn,
modified or qualified recommendation. The Inco board of
directors may also withdraw, modify or qualify its
recommendation to its shareholders as set forth below under
Acquisition Proposals.
Acquisition Proposals. The combination agreement
restricts Incos ability to solicit, provide information
related to or enter into any agreement related to an acquisition
proposal other than the combination, as summarized below. For
the purposes of the combination agreement, acquisition
proposal means any of the following (other than the
combination):
|
|
|
|
|
any merger, take-over bid, amalgamation, plan of arrangement,
business combination, consolidation, recapitalization,
liquidation or
winding-up in respect
of Inco; |
|
|
|
any sale or acquisition of 20% or more of the fair market value
of the assets of Inco on a consolidated basis; |
|
|
|
any sale or acquisition of 20% or more of Incos shares of
any class or rights or interests in or to such shares; |
|
|
|
any sale of any material interest in any material joint ventures
or material mineral properties; |
|
|
|
any similar business combination or transaction, of or involving
Inco, any of its subsidiaries or material joint venture of Inco,
other than with Phelps Dodge; and |
72
|
|
|
|
|
any proposal or offer to, or public announcement of an intention
to do, any of the foregoing from any person, entity or
organization other than Phelps Dodge; |
provided that the term acquisition proposal does not
include the transactions contemplated by the support agreement.
Certain restrictions on Incos ability to solicit, provide
information related to or enter into an agreement with respect
to an acquisition proposal are qualified, as set forth in the
combination agreement and summarized below, in the event that
Inco receives a superior proposal. For the purposes of the
combination agreement, superior proposal means an
unsolicited bona fide acquisition proposal made by a third party
to Inco in writing after the date of the initial combination
agreement to purchase or otherwise acquire, directly or
indirectly, by means of merger, take-over bid, amalgamation,
plan of arrangement, business combination, consolidation,
recapitalization, liquidation or
winding-up or similar
transaction, all of the capital stock of Inco, and
|
|
|
|
|
that is reasonably capable of being completed, taking into
account all legal, financial, regulatory (including applicable
regulatory approvals) and other aspects of such proposal and the
party making such proposal; |
|
|
|
in respect of which any required financing to complete such
acquisition proposal has been demonstrated, to the satisfaction
of the Inco board of directors, acting in good faith (after
receipt of advice from its financial advisors and outside legal
counsel), is reasonably likely to be obtained; |
|
|
|
that is not subject to any due diligence condition; |
|
|
|
that is offered or made available to all shareholders of Inco in
Canada and the United States on the same terms; and |
|
|
|
in respect of which the Inco board of directors determines in
good faith: |
|
|
|
|
|
after receipt of advice from outside legal counsel, that failure
to recommend the acquisition proposal to Inco shareholders would
be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties; and |
|
|
|
after receipt of advice from its financial advisors, that taking
into account all of the terms and conditions of the acquisition
proposal, if consummated in accordance with its terms (but not
assuming away any risk of non-completion), the acquisition
proposal would result in a transaction more favorable to
shareholders from a financial point of view than the combination
transaction (including any adjustment to the terms and
conditions of the arrangement set out in the Plan of Arrangement
and the combination agreement proposed by Phelps Dodge, as
summarized below), and taking into account the long-term value
and anticipated synergies anticipated to be realized as a result
of the combination of Phelps Dodge and Inco. |
The combination agreement provides that Inco may not, directly
or indirectly, through any officer, director, employee,
financial or other advisor or representative, or agent of Inco
or any of its subsidiaries:
|
|
|
|
|
solicit, assist, initiate, encourage or otherwise facilitate any
inquiries, proposals or offers regarding any acquisition
proposal, including by furnishing non-public information or
permitting any visit to any facilities or properties of Inco or
any of its subsidiaries (including any material joint ventures
or material mineral properties); |
|
|
|
engage in any discussions or negotiations regarding, or provide
any confidential information with respect to, any acquisition
proposal, except that Inco may advise any person making an
unsolicited acquisition proposal that such acquisition proposal
does not constitute a superior proposal when the Inco board of
directors has so determined; |
|
|
|
withdraw, modify or qualify, or propose publicly to withdraw,
modify or qualify, in any manner adverse to Phelps Dodge, the
approval or recommendation of the Inco board of directors or any
committee of the board of directors; |
73
|
|
|
|
|
approve or recommend, or, for longer than 15 calendar days
following its formal commencement, remain neutral with respect
to, or propose publicly to approve or recommend, or remain
neutral with respect to, any acquisition proposal; or |
|
|
|
accept or enter into, or publicly propose to accept or enter
into, any letter of intent, agreement in principle, agreement,
arrangement or undertaking related to any acquisition proposal. |
However, the Inco board of directors may withdraw, modify or
qualify its recommendation in favor of the Plan of Arrangement
and/or engage in discussions or negotiations with, or provide
certain non-public information with respect to it, its
subsidiaries, material joint ventures and material mineral
properties to any person making an acquisition proposal, if:
|
|
|
|
|
the Inco board of directors has received an unsolicited bona
fide written acquisition proposal from such person and the Inco
board of directors has determined in good faith based on
information then available and after consultation with its
financial advisors that the proposal constitutes or could
reasonably be expected to result in a superior proposal; |
|
|
|
prior to providing any confidential information or data to any
person making an acquisition proposal that is or could
reasonably be expected to result in a superior proposal, the
Inco board of directors receives from such person an executed
confidentiality agreement which includes a standstill provision
that restricts such person from acquiring, or publicly
announcing an intention to acquire, or acquiring, any securities
or assets of Inco other than pursuant to a superior proposal for
a period of not less than one year from the date of such
confidentiality agreement, and the Inco board of directors
(a) provides a copy of any such confidentiality agreement
to Phelps Dodge promptly upon its execution and
(b) promptly provides Phelps Dodge a list of, or in the
case of information that was not previously made available to
Phelps Dodge, copies of, any information provided to such
person; and |
|
|
|
Inco promptly (and in any event within 24 hours) notifies
Phelps Dodge, at first orally and then in writing, of any: |
|
|
|
|
|
proposal, inquiry, offer (including any amendment) or request
relating to or constituting an acquisition proposal; |
|
|
|
request for discussions, negotiations or representation on the
Inco board of directors; or |
|
|
|
request for non-public information relating to Inco, any
subsidiary, material joint venture or material mining property
relating to or constituting an acquisition proposal of which
Incos directors, officers, representatives or agents are
or become aware. |
Inco has agreed that the above notice will include a description
of the terms and conditions of, and the identity of the person
making, the proposal, inquiry, offer (including any amendment)
or request, and will include copies thereof, as well as such
other details as Phelps Dodge may reasonably request. Inco has
agreed to keep Phelps Dodge promptly and fully informed of the
status, including any change to the material terms, of any such
proposal, inquiry, offer or any amendment, and to respond
promptly to all inquiries by Phelps Dodge.
In addition, the Inco board of directors may not withdraw,
modify or qualify its recommendation, in favor of the
combination or publicly propose or state its intention to do so
or enter into any agreement (other than a confidentiality
agreement, subject to the terms and conditions of the
combination agreement) relating to any acquisition proposal
unless:
|
|
|
|
|
the acquisition proposal constitutes a superior proposal; |
|
|
|
Inco has provided Phelps Dodge with notice in writing that there
is a superior proposal and all documentation (including any
confidentiality agreements) detailing that proposal and at least
10 business days have elapsed from the date that Phelps
Dodge received a copy of the written proposal (or any amendment
or revision thereof); |
74
|
|
|
|
|
if Phelps Dodge proposes to amend the terms of the arrangement
and the combination agreement in accordance with the procedures
set forth in the combination agreement, the Inco board of
directors (after receiving advice from its financial advisors
and outside legal counsel) determines in good faith (after
taking into account such amendments) that the alternative
acquisition proposal continues to be a superior proposal; |
|
|
|
Incos board of directors, after consultation with outside
legal counsel, determines in good faith that the failure to take
such action would be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties
under all applicable laws; and |
|
|
|
|
Inco, prior to entering into an agreement relating to a superior
proposal (other than a confidentiality agreement), has
terminated the combination agreement in accordance with its
terms and paid to Phelps Dodge the applicable termination fee
set forth in the combination agreement and summarized under
Termination Fees and Expenses beginning on
page 79 of this proxy statement. |
|
In the combination agreement, Inco agrees that it will:
|
|
|
|
|
cease and cause to be terminated any existing solicitation,
encouragement, activity, discussion or negotiation with any
person by Inco or any of its subsidiaries or any of their
representatives or agents in respect of any acquisition
proposal, whether or not initiated by Inco; |
|
|
|
discontinue access to any virtual or other data rooms; |
|
|
|
request (and reasonably exercise all rights it has to require)
the return or destruction of all information regarding Inco and
its subsidiaries previously provided to any person in connection
with an acquisition proposal; |
|
|
|
request (and reasonably exercise all rights it has to require)
the destruction of all material including or incorporating or
otherwise reflecting any information regarding Inco and its
subsidiaries in connection with an acquisition proposal; and |
|
|
|
not terminate, amend, modify or waive any provision of any
confidentiality or standstill or similar agreement to which Inco
or any of its subsidiaries is a party with any other person,
other than to allow such person to make and consummate a
superior proposal. |
Other Covenants. Each of Inco and Phelps Dodge has also
agreed to a number of other mutual covenants, including to:
|
|
|
|
|
comply with the confidentiality agreement previously executed by
each them in favor of each other; |
|
|
|
provide, and use its reasonable best efforts to cause its
subsidiaries to provide, the other party and its representatives
with reasonable access to its advisors, books, records,
contracts and properties as may be reasonably requested by the
other party during the period prior to the effective time,
subject to the confidentiality agreements or as restricted by
applicable law; |
|
|
|
cooperate in the preparation, filing and mailing of each
partys shareholder solicitations, provide reasonable
opportunities to review and comment on such statements (and any
amendments or supplements), to review any comments received from
any governmental entity, furnish each other with information
required by the parties in connection with such filings and
solicitations, and to advise the other party when such
solicitations have been referred by the applicable governmental
entity or of any request for amendment by such entity; |
|
|
|
furnish to the other party all information concerning it and its
shareholders required and available for the preparation of
information statements and solicitations; |
|
|
|
use reasonable best efforts to develop a joint communications
plan, ensure that any public announcements in respect of the
combination are consistent with such plan and, except in
connection with any announcement required by applicable law or
by any listing agreement or rules |
75
|
|
|
|
|
of any securities exchange, to consult with each other before
making public statements regarding the combination; |
|
|
|
not make, unless required by law, any public statement or
disclosure concerning the other partys business, financial
condition or results of operations without such other
partys consent, which will not be unreasonably withheld or
delayed; |
|
|
|
use reasonable best efforts to do all things, take all actions
necessary or advisable to consummate the combination as soon as
reasonably practicable, including to (i) obtain approval of
its respective securityholders (unless the partys board of
directors has changed its recommendation in respect of the
combination in compliance with the terms of the combination
agreement), (ii) obtain all requisite governmental
approvals required to be obtained by the applicable party,
including any merger notification forms and other information
required by United States, Canadian, European Union and other
governmental authorities and, in so doing, to consult with and
keep the other party informed to the extent legally permitted
and to obtain the other partys prior written consent
before agreeing with governmental authorities to take certain
actions under antitrust or competition laws, (iii) obtain
any required non-governmental third-party approvals and consents
and (iv) comply with all legal requirements, including
those of the Superior Court of Justice (Ontario); |
|
|
|
cooperate in all reasonable respects and use commercially
reasonable efforts to contest any action or proceeding and to
have vacated, lifted, reversed or overturned any decree,
judgment, injunction or other order that prohibits, prevents or
restricts the combination; |
|
|
|
take all actions necessary to eliminate or minimize the effects
of any fair price, moratorium, control share acquisition or
other anti-takeover statute or regulation that is or may become
applicable to the combination agreement and the combination; |
|
|
|
take all actions necessary or appropriate to exempt the exchange
of Inco common shares for Phelps Dodge common stock from the
reporting requirements of Section 16(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the rules and regulations
promulgated thereunder; and |
|
|
|
take all reasonable steps to ensure that the acquisition of Inco
common shares by Phelps Dodge Canada Inc. is treated as a
qualified stock purchase for U.S. federal
income tax purposes. |
Inco has made a number of additional covenants in connection
with the combination (in each case subject to the limits and
qualifications set forth in the combination agreement),
including to:
|
|
|
|
|
as soon as reasonably practicable, apply for an order approving
the combination and to seek the applicable interim and final
orders of the Superior Court of Justice (Ontario) under the CBCA; |
|
|
|
in accordance with such interim order, as soon as reasonably
practicable, convene and hold a special meeting of the Inco
shareholders for the purpose of approving the Plan of
Arrangement; |
|
|
|
at least 10 days prior to the special meeting, provide to Phelps
Dodge a list of those persons who may be deemed to be, in
Incos reasonable judgment, affiliates of Inco within the
meaning of Rule 145 promulgated under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended; |
|
|
|
provide Phelps Dodge with a copy of any purported exercise of
any dissenters rights and written communications relating
to such exercise; |
|
|
|
not settle or compromise any claim, litigation, complaint or
other similar action brought by any present, former or purported
holder of any of Inco securities in connection with the
combination without the prior written consent of Phelps Dodge,
not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed; and |
|
|
|
subject to obtaining the final order of the Superior Court of
Justice (Ontario) and the satisfaction or waiver of the closing
conditions described below in Conditions to the
Combination, send to the Director (as defined in the CBCA)
all documents required in order to give effect to the
arrangement. |
76
Phelps Dodge has made a number of additional covenants in
connection with the combination (in each case subject to the
limits and qualifications set forth in the combination
agreement), including to:
|
|
|
|
|
in the event that the exemption from registration under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is not available for the
issuance of the Phelps Dodge common stock to be issued in
connection with the combination, take all necessary action to
file a registration statement in order to register such Phelps
Dodge common stock, and use its reasonable best efforts to cause
the registration statement to become effective by the effective
time; |
|
|
|
use its reasonable best efforts to obtain the approval of the
New York Stock Exchange and the Toronto Stock Exchange for the
listing of the Phelps Dodge common stock to be issued in
connection with the combination on each such exchange; |
|
|
|
take all actions necessary to restate its certificate of
incorporation in accordance with the terms and conditions set
forth in Exhibit C to the combination agreement and
summarized in Other Agreements and Documents
Restated Certificate of Incorporation, subject to the
approval of (i) the shareholders of Phelps Dodge and
(ii) the satisfaction or waiver of the closing conditions
described below in Conditions to the Combination; |
|
|
|
use its reasonable best efforts to cause the full board of
directors of the combined company, at the effective time, to
consist of 11 individuals who are currently members of the
Phelps Dodge board of directors and four individuals who are
currently members of the board of directors of Inco; |
|
|
|
take all actions necessary to cause, at the effective time: J.
Steven Whisler, the current chairman and chief executive officer
of Phelps Dodge to serve as chairman and chief executive officer
of the combined company; and Scott M. Hand, the current chairman
and chief executive officer of Inco to become the vice chairman
of the combined company and the president of the combined
companys nickel division; and |
|
|
|
from and after the effective time, (i) fulfill and cause
Incos successors to fulfill indemnification obligations to
the present and former directors and officers of Inco as in
effect immediately prior to the effective time, (ii) not
modify in a way adverse to directors and officers of Inco any
charter provisions related to indemnification and exculpation
and (iii) provide directors and officers
liability insurance policies with a claims period of six years
with coverage and benefits comparable to those currently
provided by Inco. |
Conditions to the Combination
Phelps Dodges and Incos obligations to effect the
combination are subject to conditions that must be satisfied
prior to the effective time, including:
|
|
|
|
|
the approval of the Plan of Arrangement by the Inco
shareholders, in accordance with any conditions imposed by the
interim order; |
|
|
|
the approval by the Phelps Dodge shareholders of the restated
certificate of incorporation and the authorization and issuance
of the Phelps Dodge common stock to be issued in connection with
the combination; |
|
|
|
receipt of the interim order and the final order approving the
Plan of Arrangement from the Superior Court of Justice (Ontario)
in form and terms reasonably acceptable to Phelps Dodge and
Inco, and those orders having not been set aside or modified in
a manner unacceptable to Phelps Dodge or Inco; |
|
|
|
the absence of injunctions, orders or laws restraining,
enjoining or making illegal the consummation of the combination; |
|
|
|
receipt of approvals required under the Competition Act and the
Investment Canada Act, and the expiration or termination of
applicable waiting periods under the HSR Act and the Council
Regulation; |
77
|
|
|
|
|
receipt of New York Stock Exchange and Toronto Stock Exchange
approval for listing of the Phelps Dodge common stock to be
issued in connection with the combination; and |
|
|
|
the amendment and restatement of the Phelps Dodges
certificate of incorporation in accordance with the combination
agreement. |
On July 12, 2006, the waiting period under the HSR Act was
terminated and on July 25, 2006, we received the
Competition Act Approval and, therefore, the conditions relating
thereto under the combination agreement have been satisfied.
Each partys obligation to effect the arrangement is
subject to the satisfaction of the following additional
conditions by the other party, or the waiver of such conditions
by the party entitled to the benefit of such condition:
|
|
|
|
|
the representations and warranties of the other party in the
combination agreement (without giving effect to any materiality
or material adverse effect qualification) being true and correct
as of the closing date of the combination (or other date
specified in the applicable representation and warranty), except
as would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in
the aggregate, a material adverse effect on the other party, and
the delivery of an officers certificate with respect
thereto; |
|
|
|
performance and compliance in all material respects with all
agreements and covenants required by the combination agreement
to have been complied with, on, or by the closing date and the
delivery of an officers certificate with respect
thereto; and |
|
|
|
the absence of any fact, event, change, development,
circumstance or effect since the date of the initial combination
agreement which, individually or in the aggregate, has had or
would reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect
on the other party. |
In addition, Phelps Dodge will not be obligated to complete the
combination if either (i) Inco has not completed the
acquisition of at least 50.01% of Falconbridges
outstanding common shares on the terms set forth in the
combination agreement or (ii) the support agreement has not
been terminated in accordance with its terms. On July 28,
2006, the support agreement was terminated in accordance with
its terms and, therefore, this condition has been satisfied.
Incos obligation to effect the combination is also subject
to the satisfaction by Phelps Dodge or waiver by Inco of the
condition that Phelps Dodge has caused the combined company
board of directors to consist of 11 individuals who are
currently members of the Phelps Dodge board of directors and
four individuals who are currently members of the board of
directors of Inco.
Amendment and Waiver
Subject to applicable law and the interim order of the Superior
Court of Justice (Ontario), at any time prior to the effective
time, Phelps Dodge and Inco may amend the combination agreement
by written agreement. However, after the Inco shareholders have
approved the Plan of Arrangement or the Phelps Dodge
shareholders have approved the restated certificate of
incorporation and the authorization and issuance of the Phelps
Dodge common stock to be issued in connection with the
combination, no amendment requiring further approval by the
Phelps Dodge or Inco shareholders, as applicable, may be
effected without first obtaining that further approval.
78
Termination
Phelps Dodge and Inco may terminate the combination agreement by
mutual written consent of each of their board of directors. In
addition, either Phelps Dodge or Inco may terminate the
combination agreement prior to the effective time if:
|
|
|
|
|
the combination is not consummated on or before March 31,
2007, except that a party whose action in breach of the
agreement has been a principal cause of or resulted in such
failure does not have the right to terminate for the failure of
the combination to occur; |
|
|
|
any law is passed that makes the arrangement illegal or
otherwise prohibited or a governmental entity in the United
States or Canada issues a final, non-appealable order or takes
another final, non-appealable action with the effect of
permanently restraining, enjoining or otherwise prohibiting
consummation of the combination; |
|
|
|
the shareholders of Inco fail to approve the Plan of
Arrangement, or the shareholders of Phelps Dodge fail to approve
the restated certificate of incorporation or the authorization
and issuance of the Phelps Dodge common stock to be issued in
connection with the combination, in each case, upon a vote taken
at the applicable shareholder meeting or any adjournment or
postponement thereof; |
|
|
|
the other party cannot satisfy the conditions related to its
representations, warranties, covenants and agreements on or
before March 31, 2007; or |
|
|
|
it or the other party withdraws, modifies or qualifies the
recommendation of its board of directors in favor of the
transactions contemplated by the combination agreement. |
In addition, Inco may terminate the combination agreement if it
proposes to enter into a definitive agreement with respect to a
superior proposal in compliance with the terms and conditions of
the combination agreement summarized under Acquisition
Proposals, above, provided that Inco has paid the
termination fee discussed below.
In the event of the termination of the combination agreement,
the obligations of Phelps Dodge and Inco in respect of the
combination agreement will terminate, except for certain general
provisions, provisions related to fees and expenses and
termination of the combination agreement and the confidentiality
agreements. Except for the foregoing, there will be no liability
on the part of either Phelps Dodge or Inco upon termination of
the combination agreement except for liabilities or damages
arising from a willful or intentional breach of the combination
agreement.
Termination Fees and Expenses
Termination Fees and Expenses Payable by Inco. Inco will
pay to Phelps Dodge a termination fee in an aggregate amount
equal to $475 million in the event that the combination
agreement is terminated:
|
|
|
|
|
by Phelps Dodge or Inco if Incos board of directors
withdraws, modifies or qualifies its recommendation that the
Inco shareholders approve the plan of arrangement, unless the
withdrawal, modification or qualification is due to a material
adverse effect in respect of Phelps Dodge having occurred since
the date of the initial combination agreement, and the Inco
board has determined in good faith (after receipt of advice from
its legal and financial advisors) that failure to so withdraw,
modify or change its recommendation, or refusal to reaffirm its
recommendation, would be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties,
which fee shall be payable by Inco within one business day of
demand by Phelps Dodge; or |
|
|
|
by Inco if Inco proposes to enter into a definitive agreement in
respect of a superior proposal in compliance with the provisions
of the combination agreement, which fee shall be payable by Inco
immediately prior to the termination. |
79
Inco will pay to Phelps Dodge, within one business day of demand
by Phelps Dodge, an aggregate amount equal to $125 million,
in the event that the combination agreement is terminated:
|
|
|
|
|
by Phelps Dodge or Inco, if such party terminates the
combination agreement after March 31, 2007, in accordance
with the terms of the combination agreement and, between the
date of the initial combination agreement and the date of
termination, an acquisition proposal (or an intention to make a
proposal) for Inco has been publicly announced or otherwise made
known to Inco shareholders, which proposal, if consummated,
would result in the person making the proposal holding, directly
or indirectly or acting jointly or in concert with others, a
majority of the outstanding shares of Inco; or |
|
|
|
by Inco or Phelps Dodge if the Inco shareholder vote was taken
at Incos duly convened shareholder meeting or an
adjournment or postponement thereof and Incos shareholder
approval was not obtained. |
In the event of termination under the two bullet points above,
if within 12 months after termination, Inco consummates any
transaction pursuant to which a person acquires, together with
such persons other holdings of Inco common shares,
directly or indirectly or acting jointly or in concert with
others, a majority of the outstanding shares of Inco, then Inco
will pay to Phelps Dodge, within one business day of demand by
Phelps Dodge, $475 million, less any amounts previously
paid to Phelps Dodge pursuant to the applicable provision
discussed in the previous two bullet points.
Inco will pay to Phelps Dodge, within one business day of demand
by Phelps Dodge, Phelps Dodges
out-of-pocket fees and
expenses (up to a maximum of $40 million) relating to the
combination (including fees and expenses of its advisors and
affiliates) if Phelps Dodge terminates the combination agreement
because Inco cannot satisfy the conditions related to its
representations, warranties and covenants on or before
March 31, 2007. In the event that Inco pays or is obligated
to pay such expense to Phelps Dodge and an acquisition proposal
(or an intention to make a proposal) for Inco had been publicly
announced or otherwise made known to Inco shareholders prior to
termination, which proposal, if consummated, would result in the
person making the proposal holding, directly or indirectly or
acting jointly or in concert with others, a majority of the
outstanding shares of Inco and, within 12 months after
termination, Inco consummates any transaction pursuant to which
a person acquires, together with such persons other
holdings of Inco common shares, directly or indirectly or acting
jointly or in concert with others, a majority of the outstanding
shares of Inco, then Inco will pay to Phelps Dodge, within one
business day of demand by Phelps Dodge, $475 million, less
any expenses previously paid to Phelps Dodge.
Termination Fees and Expenses Payable by Phelps Dodge.
Phelps Dodge will pay to Inco, within one business day of demand
by Inco, a termination fee in an aggregate amount equal to
$500 million in the event that the combination agreement is
terminated by Inco or Phelps Dodge, if Phelps Dodges board
of directors withdraws, modifies or qualifies its recommendation
that the Phelps Dodge shareholders approve the restated
certificate of incorporation and the authorization and issuance
of the shares of Phelps Dodge common stock to be issued in
connection with the combination, unless the withdrawal,
modification or qualification is due to a material adverse
effect in respect of Inco having occurred since the date of the
initial combination agreement and if the Phelps Dodge board has
determined in good faith (after receipt of advice from its legal
and financial advisors) that failure to so withdraw, modify or
change its recommendation, or refusal to reaffirm its
recommendation, would be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties.
Phelps Dodge will pay to Inco, within one business day of demand
by Inco, an aggregate amount of $125 million, in the event
that the combination agreement is terminated:
|
|
|
|
|
by Phelps Dodge or Inco, if such party terminates the
combination agreement after March 31, 2007 in accordance
with the terms of the combination agreement and, between the
date of the initial combination agreement and the date of
termination, an acquisition proposal (or an intention to make a
proposal) for Phelps Dodge has been publicly announced or
otherwise made known to Phelps Dodge shareholders, which
proposal, if consummated, would result in the person making the |
80
|
|
|
|
|
proposal holding, directly or indirectly or acting jointly or in
concert with others, a majority of the outstanding capital stock
of Phelps Dodge; or |
|
|
|
by Phelps Dodge or Inco, if the Phelps Dodge shareholder vote
was taken at Phelps Dodges duly convened shareholder
meeting or an adjournment or postponement thereof and of Phelps
Dodges shareholder approval was not obtained. |
In the event of termination under the two bullet points above,
if within 12 months after termination, Phelps Dodge
consummates any transaction pursuant to which a person acquires,
together with such persons other holdings of Phelps Dodge
common stock, directly or indirectly or acting jointly or in
concert with others, a majority of the outstanding shares of
Phelps Dodge, then Phelps Dodge will pay to Inco, within one
business day of demand by Inco, $500 million, less any
amounts previously paid to Inco pursuant to the applicable
provision discussed in the previous two bullet points.
Phelps Dodge will pay to Inco, within one business day of demand
by Inco, Incos
out-of-pocket fees and
expenses (up to a maximum of $40 million) relating to the
combination (including fees and expenses of its advisors and
affiliates) if Inco terminates the combination agreement because
Phelps Dodge cannot satisfy the conditions related to its
representations, warranties and covenants on or before
March 31, 2007. In the event that Phelps Dodge pays or is
obligated to pay such expenses to Inco and an acquisition
proposal (or an intention to make a proposal) for Phelps Dodge
had been publicly announced or otherwise made known to Phelps
Dodge shareholders prior to termination, which proposal, if
consummated, would result in the person making the proposal
holding, directly or indirectly or acting jointly or in concert
with others, a majority of the outstanding shares of Phelps
Dodge and, within twelve months after termination, Phelps Dodge
consummates any transaction pursuant to which a person acquires,
together with such persons other holdings of Inco common
shares, directly or indirectly or acting jointly or in concert
with others, a majority of the outstanding shares of Phelps
Dodge, then Phelps Dodge will pay to Inco, within one business
day of demand by Inco, $500 million, less any expenses
previously paid to Inco.
Fees and Expenses
Whether or not the combination is completed, all costs and
expenses incurred in connection with the combination will be
paid by the party incurring the expense, except as otherwise
provided in the combination agreement and summarized under
Termination Fees and Expenses above.
OTHER AGREEMENTS AND DOCUMENTS
Restated Certificate of Incorporation
In connection with the closing of the combination, the restated
certificate of incorporation of Phelps Dodge will become
effective, and Phelps Dodges name will be changed to
Phelps Dodge Inco Corporation, the number of authorized shares
of the common stock of Phelps Dodge will be increased from the
300 million shares currently authorized by Phelps
Dodges restated certificate of incorporation to
800 million shares and the maximum number of members of
Phelps Dodges board of directors will be increased from 12
to 15.
Phelps Dodges Post-Closing Board of Directors and
Officers
We expect that, upon consummation of the combination of our
company with Inco, J. Steven Whisler, the chairman and chief
executive officer of Phelps Dodge, will be chairman and chief
executive officer of the combined company; Scott M. Hand, the
chairman and chief executive officer of Inco, will become the
vice chairman of the combined company and the president of the
combined companys nickel division; Timothy R. Snider, the
president and chief operating officer of Phelps Dodge, will hold
the same positions in the combined company; and Ramiro G. Peru,
executive vice president and chief financial officer of Phelps
Dodge, will hold the same positions in the combined company. We
expect Messrs. Whisler, Snider and Peru to be based in
Phoenix and Mr. Hand to be based in Toronto.
We expect the board of directors of the combined company to be
composed of 15 members, 11 of which will be members of the
current Phelps Dodge board of directors and four of which will
be members of the current board of Inco.
81
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Statements presented
herein are derived from the historical consolidated financial
statements of Phelps Dodge and Inco. The Unaudited Pro Forma
Combined Financial Statements are prepared using the purchase
method of accounting, with the acquisition of Inco, by Phelps
Dodge assumed to have occurred on January 1, 2005, for
statement of income purposes and on June 30, 2006, for
balance sheet purposes using accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States (U.S. GAAP). Upon completion of
the combination with Inco, the pre-combination shareholders of
Phelps Dodge will own approximately 57% of the combined company
and the pre-combination shareholders of Inco, approximately 43%.
In addition to considering these relative shareholdings, the
company also considered the proposed composition and terms of
the board of directors, the proposed structure and members of
the executive management team of Phelps Dodge Inco, and the
premium paid by Phelps Dodge to acquire Inco, in determining the
accounting acquirer. Based on the weight of these factors, the
company concluded that Phelps Dodge was the accounting acquirer.
The pro forma amounts have been developed from (a) the
audited consolidated financial statements of Phelps Dodge
contained in its Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2005, which were prepared in
accordance with U.S. GAAP, (b) the audited
consolidated financial statements of Inco contained in its
Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2005, which were prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in
Canada (Canadian GAAP) and adjusted to U.S. GAAP based on a
reconciliation presented in the footnotes to such statements,
(c) the unaudited consolidated financial statements of
Phelps Dodge contained in its Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the
period ended June 30, 2006, which were prepared in
accordance with U.S. GAAP and (d) the unaudited
consolidated financial statements of Inco contained in its
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the
period ended June 30, 2006, which were prepared in
accordance with Canadian GAAP and adjusted to U.S. GAAP based on
a reconciliation presented in the footnotes to such statements.
Phelps Dodge intends to complete its share repurchase program
within the 12 months after closing of the Inco transaction
in an amount up to $5 billion. The share repurchase program
has not been included in the Unaudited Pro Forma Combined
Financial Statements and is not a condition of the proposed
business combination.
The Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Statements are
provided for illustrative purposes only and do not purport to
represent what the actual consolidated results of operations or
the consolidated financial position of Phelps Dodge would have
been had the combination occurred on the dates assumed, nor are
they necessarily indicative of future consolidated results of
operations or consolidated financial position. In this regard,
we note that the Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial
Statements do not give effect to (i) any integration costs
that may be incurred as a result of the acquisition,
(ii) synergies, operating efficiencies and cost savings
that are expected to result from the acquisition,
(iii) benefits expected to be derived from the combined
companys growth projects or brownfield expansions,
(iv) changes in commodities prices subsequent to the dates
of such Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Statements,
(v) Phelp Dodges share repurchase program or
(vi) the impact of undertakings that Phelps Dodge is
prepared to make in order to address regulatory clearance
requirements.
Phelps Dodge has not developed formal plans for combining the
operations. Accordingly, additional liabilities may be incurred
in connection with the business combination and any ultimate
restructuring. These additional liabilities and costs have not
been contemplated in the Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial
Statements because information necessary to reasonably estimate
such costs and to formulate detailed restructuring plans is not
available to Phelps Dodge. The allocation of the purchase price
to acquired assets and liabilities in the Unaudited Pro Forma
Combined Financial Statements are based on managements
preliminary internal valuation estimates. Such allocations will
be finalized based on valuation and other studies to be
performed by management with the services of outside valuation
specialists after the closing of the business combination.
Accordingly, the purchase price allocation adjustments and
related impacts on the Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial
Statements are
82
preliminary and are subject to revision, which may be material,
after the closing of the business combination.
The Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Statements should be
read in conjunction with the separate historical consolidated
financial statements and accompanying notes of Phelps Dodge and
Inco incorporated by reference into this proxy statement.
83
PHELPS DODGE CORPORATION
PRO FORMA COMBINED STATEMENT OF INCOME
PHELPS DODGE AND INCO COMBINED
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006
(UNAUDITED)
(AMOUNTS IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT PER SHARE INFORMATION)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical |
|
Pro Forma |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments |
|
Pro Forma |
|
|
Phelps Dodge |
|
Inco |
|
(Note 3) |
|
Combined |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and other operating revenues
|
|
$ |
5,217 |
|
|
|
3,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of products sold
|
|
|
3,272 |
|
|
|
1,794 |
|
|
|
(56 |
)(N) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
(P) |
|
|
5,016 |
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
106 |
(J) |
|
|
480 |
|
|
Selling and general administrative expense
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
229 |
|
|
Exploration and research expense
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
Special items and provisions, net
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,679 |
|
|
|
2,149 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
5,884 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
1,538 |
|
|
|
876 |
|
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
2,358 |
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
(35 |
)(A) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(84 |
)(O) |
|
|
(192 |
) |
|
Capitalized interest
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
(A) |
|
|
59 |
|
|
Miscellaneous income and expense, net
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes,
minority interests in consolidated subsidiaries and equity in
net earnings (losses) of affiliated companies
|
|
|
1,588 |
|
|
|
882 |
|
|
|
(140 |
) |
|
|
2,330 |
|
|
Provision for taxes on income
|
|
|
(449 |
) |
|
|
(299 |
) |
|
|
47 |
(F) |
|
|
(701 |
) |
|
Minority interests in consolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
(319 |
) |
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(359 |
) |
|
Equity in net earnings (losses) of affiliated companies
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
822 |
|
|
|
543 |
|
|
|
(93 |
) |
|
|
1,272 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share from continuing operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
4.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.56 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
4.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.55 |
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
202.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
357.5 |
(M) |
|
Diluted
|
|
|
203.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
358.6 |
(M) |
See accompanying notes to pro forma combined financial
statements.
84
PHELPS DODGE CORPORATION
PRO FORMA COMBINED STATEMENT OF INCOME
PHELPS DODGE AND INCO COMBINED
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2005
(UNAUDITED)
(AMOUNTS IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT PER SHARE INFORMATION)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical |
|
Pro Forma |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments |
|
Pro Forma |
|
|
Phelps Dodge |
|
Inco |
|
(Note 3) |
|
Combined |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and other operating revenues
|
|
$ |
8,287 |
|
|
|
4,518 |
|
|
|
(55 |
)(I) |
|
|
12,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of products sold
|
|
|
5,282 |
|
|
|
2,697 |
|
|
|
(55 |
)(I) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(93 |
)(N) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
(P) |
|
|
7,841 |
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
442 |
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
212 |
(J) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
(P) |
|
|
911 |
|
|
Selling and general administrative expense
|
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
365 |
|
|
Exploration and research expense
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
Special items and provisions, net
|
|
|
523 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,522 |
|
|
|
3,318 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
9,915 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
1,765 |
|
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
|
(130 |
) |
|
|
2,835 |
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(79 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
(103 |
)(A) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(168 |
)(O) |
|
|
(372 |
) |
|
Capitalized interest
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
103 |
(A) |
|
|
92 |
|
|
Early debt extinguishment costs
|
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
)(A) |
|
|
(89 |
) |
|
Gain on sale of cost-basis investment
|
|
|
439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
439 |
|
|
Change in interest gains
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
Miscellaneous income and expense, net
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
7 |
(A) |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes,
minority interests in consolidated subsidiaries and equity in
net earnings (losses) of affiliated
companies
|
|
|
2,348 |
|
|
|
1,070 |
|
|
|
(300 |
) |
|
|
3,118 |
|
|
Provision for taxes on income
|
|
|
(577 |
) |
|
|
(378 |
) |
|
|
98 |
(F) |
|
|
(857 |
) |
|
Minority interests in consolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
(190 |
) |
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(254 |
) |
|
Equity in net earnings (losses) of affiliated
companies
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
(A) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
1,584 |
|
|
|
628 |
|
|
|
(200 |
) |
|
|
2,012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share from continuing operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
8.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.73 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
7.82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.62 |
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
195.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
351.0 |
(M) |
|
Diluted
|
|
|
202.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
357.8 |
(M) |
See accompanying notes to pro forma combined financial
statements.
85
PHELPS DODGE CORPORATION
PRO FORMA COMBINED BALANCE SHEET
PHELPS DODGE AND INCO COMBINED
JUNE 30, 2006
(UNAUDITED)
(AMOUNTS IN MILLIONS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical |
|
Pro Forma |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments |
|
Pro Forma |
|
|
Phelps Dodge |
|
Inco |
|
(Note 3) |
|
Combined |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
2,632 |
|
|
|
690 |
|
|
|
(4,124 |
)(B) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100 |
)(C) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(358 |
)(E) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
345 |
(H) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
417 |
(K) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,546 |
(L) |
|
|
2,048 |
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
Accounts receivable, less allowance
|
|
|
1,592 |
|
|
|
1,151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,743 |
|
|
Mill and leach stockpiles
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
372 |
|
|
|
1,254 |
|
|
|
(147 |
)(A) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,501 |
(D) |
|
|
3,980 |
|
|
Supplies
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
147 |
(A) |
|
|
361 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
(56 |
)(A) |
|
|
288 |
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56 |
(A) |
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
5,231 |
|
|
|
3,213 |
|
|
|
1,227 |
|
|
|
9,671 |
|
Investments and long-term receivables
|
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
199 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
5,176 |
|
|
|
7,670 |
|
|
|
28 |
(D) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,235 |
(D),(J) |
|
|
17,109 |
|
Long-term mill and leach stockpiles
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
184 |
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155 |
(F) |
|
|
225 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,536 |
(D) |
|
|
8,548 |
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
Trust assets
|
|
|
568 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
568 |
|
Other assets and deferred charges
|
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
503 |
|
|
|
(76 |
)(D) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
(L) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(75 |
)(Q) |
|
|
762 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
11,806 |
|
|
|
11,386 |
|
|
|
14,081 |
|
|
|
37,273 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to pro forma combined financial
statements.
86
PHELPS DODGE CORPORATION
PRO FORMA COMBINED BALANCE
SHEET (Continued)
PHELPS DODGE AND INCO COMBINED
JUNE 30, 2006
(UNAUDITED)
(AMOUNTS IN MILLIONS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical |
|
Pro Forma |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments |
|
Pro Forma |
|
|
Phelps Dodge |
|
Inco |
|
(Note 3) |
|
Combined |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES |
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt
|
|
$ |
61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
1,899 |
|
|
|
1,596 |
|
|
|
(15 |
)(D) |
|
|
3,480 |
|
|
Dividends payable
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
Accrued income taxes
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
370 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
2,207 |
|
|
|
1,889 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
4,081 |
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
704 |
|
|
|
2,110 |
|
|
|
26 |
(D) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(479 |
)(G) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,546 |
(L) |
|
|
4,907 |
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
712 |
|
|
|
1,304 |
|
|
|
2,727 |
(F) |
|
|
4,743 |
|
|
Other liabilities and deferred credits
|
|
|
1,378 |
|
|
|
1,813 |
|
|
|
444 |
(D) |
|
|
3,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,001 |
|
|
|
7,116 |
|
|
|
5,249 |
|
|
|
17,366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interests in consolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
1,219 |
|
|
|
816 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares
|
|
|
1,275 |
|
|
|
3,211 |
|
|
|
971 |
(G) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,211 |
)(I) |
|
|
2,246 |
|
|
Capital in excess of par value
|
|
|
1,360 |
|
|
|
576 |
|
|
|
11,315 |
(G) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(576 |
)(I) |
|
|
12,675 |
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
3,049 |
|
|
|
394 |
|
|
|
(394 |
)(I) |
|
|
3,049 |
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
|
(787 |
) |
|
|
977 |
(D) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(382 |
)(F) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
192 |
(I) |
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
Warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
(60 |
)(I) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,586 |
|
|
|
3,454 |
|
|
|
8,832 |
|
|
|
17,872 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
11,806 |
|
|
|
11,386 |
|
|
|
14,081 |
|
|
|
37,273 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to pro forma combined financial
statements.
87
COMBINATION OF PHELPS DODGE AND INCO
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED PRO FORMA
COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Statements have been
derived from historical consolidated financial statements of
Phelps Dodge and Inco incorporated by reference into this proxy
statement.
Upon completion of the combination with Inco, the
pre-combination shareholders of Phelps Dodge will own
approximately 57% of the combined company and the
pre-combination shareholders of Inco, approximately 43%. In
addition to considering these relative shareholdings, the
company also considered the proposed composition and terms of
the board of directors, the proposed structure and members of
the executive management team of Phelps Dodge Inco, and the
premium paid by Phelps Dodge to acquire Inco, in determining the
accounting acquirer. Based on the weight of these factors, the
company concluded that Phelps Dodge was the accounting acquirer.
Phelps Dodge is proposing a combination of Phelps Dodge and
Inco. Phelps Dodge proposes to acquire all the issued and
outstanding common shares of Inco for Cdn.$80.70 (US$71.58) per
share composed of cash of Cdn.$20.25 per share and stock
worth Cdn.$60.45 per share (based on Phelps Dodges
closing price of US$79.79 on July 14, 2006). On
July 14, 2006, the US$/Cdn.$ exchange rate was 0.887
resulting in a cash component of US$17.96 per share and
stock of US$53.62 per share. The Phelps Dodge to Inco stock
exchange ratio was 0.672.
The transaction would be accounted for under the purchase method
of accounting. The pro forma adjustments reflect Phelps
Dodges acquisition of 100 percent of Incos net
reported assets at their fair values at June 30, 2006, and
the accounting for Inco as a wholly owned subsidiary.
The purchase price for the business combination is estimated as
follows (dollars and shares in millions, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
Phelps Dodges acquisition of Inco:
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares outstanding
|
|
|
231.087 |
|
Exchange offer ratio of Phelps Dodge common stock for Inco
common share
|
|
|
0.672 |
|
Shares of Phelps Dodge common stock to be issued
|
|
|
155.291 |
|
Weighted average market price of each share of Phelps Dodge
common stock from July 13-18, 2006
|
|
$ |
79.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of Phelps Dodge common stock issued, comprising par
value of $971 ($6.25 per share) and capital in excess of
par of $11,315
|
|
$ |
12,286 |
|
Cash consideration of $17.85 for each Inco common share using
the US$/Cdn.$ exchange rate as of July 27, 2006
|
|
|
4,124 |
|
Change of control costs and related employee benefits
|
|
|
243 |
|
Estimated transaction costs
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase price
|
|
$ |
16,753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The final purchase price could change materially from the
purchase price estimated above as a result of changes in the
US$/ Cdn.$ exchange rate. The potential impact of this factor
cannot be estimated.
88
COMBINATION OF PHELPS DODGE AND INCO
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED PRO FORMA
COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
3. |
PRO FORMA ASSUMPTIONS AND ADJUSTMENTS |
The following assumptions and related pro forma adjustments give
effect to the proposed business combination of Phelps Dodge and
Inco as if such combination occurred on January 1, 2005, in
the Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Statement of Income for the
six-month interim period ended June 30, 2006, and for the
year ended December 31, 2005, respectively, and on
June 30, 2006, for the Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Balance
Sheet.
The Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Statements are
provided for illustrative purposes only and do not purport to
represent what the actual consolidated results of operations or
the consolidated financial position of Phelps Dodge would have
been had the business combination with Inco occurred on the
respective dates assumed, nor are they necessarily indicative of
future consolidated operating results or financial position.
The Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Statements do not
reflect and do not give effect to (i) any integration costs
that may be incurred as a result of the acquisition,
(ii) synergies, operating efficiencies and cost savings
that are expected to result from the acquisition,
(iii) benefits expected to be derived from the combined
companys growth projects or brownfield expansions,
(iv) changes in commodities prices subsequent to the dates
of such Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Statements,
(v) Phelps Dodges share repurchase program or
(vi) the impact of undertakings that Phelps Dodge is
prepared to make in order to address regulatory clearance
requirements.
Additionally, Phelps Dodge believes that cost savings will be
realized upon the consolidation and integration of the
companies. Phelps Dodge has not developed formal plans for
combining the operations. Accordingly, additional liabilities
may be incurred in connection with the business combination and
any ultimate restructuring. These additional liabilities and
costs have not been contemplated in the Unaudited Pro Forma
Combined Financial Statements because information necessary to
reasonably estimate such costs and to formulate detailed
restructuring plans is not available to Phelps Dodge.
Accordingly, the allocation of the purchase price cannot be
estimated with a reasonable degree of accuracy and may differ
materially from the amounts assumed in the Unaudited Pro Forma
Combined Financial Statements.
The Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Statements include
the following pro forma assumptions and adjustments:
|
|
|
(A) Reclassifications have been made to the Inco historical
consolidated financial information to conform to Phelps
Dodges presentation. |
|
|
(B) These pro forma adjustments represent payment of the
cash component of the purchase price for Incos common
shares and for Incos outstanding stock options, warrants
and convertible debt of $546 million. |
|
|
(C) Phelps Dodge estimates it will incur approximately
$100 million of transaction costs, consisting primarily of
investment bankers, attorneys, financing and accountants fees,
and financial printing and other charges related to the purchase
of Inco and debt acquisition costs. These estimates are
preliminary and, therefore, are subject to change. |
89
COMBINATION OF PHELPS DODGE AND INCO
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED PRO FORMA
COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
(D) The pro forma adjustments to fair value Incos net
reported assets are estimated as follows (in millions): |
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to fair value inventory
|
|
$ |
2,501 |
|
Adjustment to fair value asset retirement costs(P)
|
|
$ |
28 |
|
Adjustment to fair value debt(O)
|
|
$ |
26 |
|
Adjustment to fair value pension obligations
|
|
$ |
1,043 |
|
Adjustment to fair value postretirement obligations other than
pensions
|
|
$ |
329 |
|
Adjustment to fair value asset retirement obligations(P)
|
|
$ |
94 |
|
Adjustment to fair value derivative instrument obligations
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
Adjustment to fair value property, plant and equipment(J)
|
|
$ |
4,235 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
$ |
8,536 |
|
|
|
|
Due to limited publicly available information, the allocation of
the purchase price is based upon managements preliminary
estimates and certain assumptions with respect to the fair value
increment associated with the assets to be acquired and the
liabilities to be assumed. The actual fair values of the assets
and liabilities will be determined as of the date of acquisition
and may differ materially from the amounts disclosed above in
the assumed pro forma purchase price allocation due to the
changes in fair values of the assets and liabilities until the
date of the transaction, and as further analysis is completed.
The actual allocation of the purchase price may result in
different adjustments in the Unaudited Pro Forma Combined
Statement of Income. |
|
|
(E) This pro forma adjustment recognizes certain estimated
change of control obligations arising from the combination of
Inco and Phelps Dodge related to employee benefits of
$243 million and certain costs related to investment
bankers of $115 million. |
|
|
(F) The estimated income tax effect of the pro forma
adjustments has been recorded based upon the estimated statutory
tax rate of approximately 34% for Inco for the six months ended
June 30, 2006, and 33% for the year ended December 31,
2005, which has been derived from public quarterly and annual
filings of Inco. The business combination is expected to be
non-taxable to the respective companies with Incos
historical tax bases surviving for income tax reporting
purposes. Additional deferred income taxes have been recognized
based on the pro forma fair value adjustments to assets and
liabilities, including an adjustment to eliminate $382 million
in accumulated other comprehensive loss related to the pro forma
adjustment of minimum pension liabilities. |
|
|
Provisions for pro forma income tax expense have been recorded
as pro forma adjustments to the Unaudited Pro Forma Combined
Statement of Income. |
|
|
(G) This pro forma adjustment reflects the issue of
155.291 million shares of Phelps Dodge common stock in
connection with the exchange offer for all the outstanding
common shares of Inco. The common stock of Phelps Dodge
represents common shares of $971 million at $6.25 per
share par value and capital in excess of par of
$11,315 million. These shares include the potential shares
issued in connection with the outstanding stock options,
warrants and $479 million (book value) of convertible debt
instruments of Inco. |
|
|
(H) This pro forma adjustment gives effect to
$345 million of proceeds deemed to be received from the
exercise of
in-the-money stock
options and warrants. Phelps Dodge has assumed that all of
Incos stock options and warrants are exercised prior to
the purchase transaction. |
|
|
(I) These pro forma adjustments eliminate the historical
shareholders equity accounts of Inco and intercompany
transactions. |
90
COMBINATION OF PHELPS DODGE AND INCO
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED PRO FORMA
COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
(J) This pro forma adjustment represents the estimated
increase to depreciation, depletion and amortization expense
associated with the preliminary fair value adjustment of
approximately $4,235 million allocated to property, plant,
and equipment as further discussed in Note (D) of the Notes to
the Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Statements. Phelps
Dodge has not completed an assessment of the fair values of
assets and liabilities of Inco and the related business
integration plans and synergies. The ultimate purchase price
allocation will include possible adjustments to fair values of
depreciable tangible assets, proven and probable reserves,
reserves related to current development projects and intangible
assets after a full review has been completed. |
|
|
The preliminary allocation of $4,235 million to property,
plant and equipment is primarily based on an assessment of
estimated cash flows from the long-lived reserves and resources
that Inco owns directly or through joint ventures with other
companies and a valuation of certain undeveloped properties and
project opportunities based on either estimated cash flows or
estimated comparable values. |
|
|
For the purpose of preparing the Unaudited Pro Forma Combined
Statement of Income, Phelps Dodge assumed an estimated remaining
useful life of 20 years, which was based on an analysis of
Incos estimated mine lives and on the estimated useful
lives of other property, plant and equipment disclosed in
Incos public filings. A one-year change in the estimated
useful life would have a 5% impact on the pro forma
depreciation, depletion and amortization expense. Additionally,
for each $1 billion that the final fair value of property,
plant and equipment and intangible assets differs from the
pro forma fair value, related depreciation, depletion and
amortization expense would increase or decrease approximately
$50 million annually or $25 million for the six
months, assuming a weighted average 20-year life. |
|
|
(K) This pro forma adjustment is associated with (i) a
payment of $150 million payable by Falconbridge to Inco as
a result of the failure to meet the minimum tender condition of
the Inco offer; (ii) a further break-up fee of
$300 million payable by Falconbridge to Inco assuming
Xstrata completes its proposed acquisition of Falconbridge; and
(iii) a payment of $33 million by Inco to LionOre
Mining International (LionOre) as a result of the Falconbridge
transaction not being completed, which negates the sale of
Falconbridges Nikkelverk refinery and related assets to
LionOre. |
|
|
(L) This pro forma adjustment relates to borrowings under
the companys one-year term loan facility
($2.5 billion) and related debt issuance costs
($51 million). The proceeds from this loan facility, in
conjunction with available cash, would be used for: (i) the
Cdn.$20.25 per share cash payment to Inco shareholders,
including payments for shares issued as a result of certain debt
that is convertible into Inco shares (approximately
$4 billion), (ii) repayments of Inco debt that may be
callable upon a change of control and (iii) payments for
other transaction fees and expenses. |
|
|
(M) Pro forma weighted average common stock and common
stock equivalents outstanding are estimated as follows (in
millions): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
June 30, 2006 | |
|
December 31, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Basic | |
|
Diluted | |
|
Basic | |
|
Diluted | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Average number of Phelps Dodge common shares outstanding
|
|
|
202.196 |
|
|
|
203.286 |
|
|
|
195.717 |
|
|
|
202.502 |
|
Shares of Phelps Dodge common stock to be issued in connection
with the business combination (Note 2)
|
|
|
155.291 |
|
|
|
155.291 |
|
|
|
155.291 |
|
|
|
155.291 |
|
91
COMBINATION OF PHELPS DODGE AND INCO
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED PRO FORMA
COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
The average number of common shares outstanding gives effect to
Incos outstanding stock options, warrants and convertible
debt, all of which are assumed to be exercised or converted.
Based upon public information reported and the current exchange
offer ratio, Phelps Dodge estimates that the incremental number
of shares of Phelps Dodge stock issuable upon the exercise of
Inco stock options, warrants and convertible debt is
approximately 20.568 million. |
|
|
(N) This pro forma adjustment eliminates amortization
expense for past service costs and net actuarial losses relating
to postretirement benefits. |
|
|
(O) This pro forma adjustment recognizes imputed interest
expense in the year ended December 31, 2005, and the six
months ended June 30, 2006, resulting from the fair value
adjustment of Incos long-term debt and acquisition related
debt discussed at (L) above at an assumed interest rate of
approximately 6.1%. A 12.5-basis point change in interest rates
would increase (decrease) interest expense by approximately
$3.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2005, and
by approximately $1.6 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2006. |
|
|
(P) These pro forma adjustments reflect the net impact on
accretion and depreciation expense for the year ended
December 31, 2005, and the six months ended June 30,
2006, associated with the fair value adjustment to the asset
retirement cost and asset retirement obligation. The accretion
adjustment primarily reflects the impact of applying a current,
credit-adjusted, risk-free interest rate and current escalation
rate in the fair value calculation. |
|
|
(Q) This pro forma adjustment represents the write-off of
the Falconbridge acquisition costs deferred by Inco as of
June 30, 2006. |
92
DESCRIPTION OF PHELPS DODGE CAPITAL STOCK
The following description of the terms of the capital stock of
Phelps Dodge is not meant to be complete and is qualified by
reference to Phelps Dodges restated certificate of
incorporation and the provisions of the Rights Agreement, dated
as of February 5, 1998, between Phelps Dodge and The Chase
Manhattan Bank, as rights agent.
As of the date of this proxy statement, the number of shares of
our capital stock authorized for issuance under our restated
certificate of incorporation consists of 300,000,000 shares
of common stock, par value $6.25 per share, and
6,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value
$1.00 per share.
Common Stock
Listing. As of August 24, 2006, there
were l million
of our common shares outstanding. The common stock of Phelps
Dodge is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the Symbol
PD.
Voting Rights. Each holder of Phelps Dodge common stock
is entitled to one vote for each share of Phelps Dodge common
stock held of record on the applicable record date on all
matters submitted to a vote of shareholders. The holders of
Phelps Dodge common stock are entitled to receive, from funds
legally available for the payment thereof, dividends if, when
and as declared by resolution of the board of directors, subject
to any preferential dividend rights granted to the holders of
any outstanding Phelps Dodge preferred stock
Dividend Rights; Rights upon Liquidation. In the event of
liquidation, each share of Phelps Dodge common stock is entitled
to share pro rata in any distribution of Phelps Dodges
assets after payment or providing for the payment of liabilities
and the liquidation preference of any outstanding Phelps Dodge
preferred stock.
Preemptive Rights. Holders of Phelps Dodge common stock
have no preemptive rights to purchase, subscribe for or
otherwise acquire any unissued shares, treasury shares or other
securities.
Rights Agreement. Each share of Phelps Dodge common stock
carries with it one preferred share purchase right. If these
rights become exercisable, each right entitles the registered
holder to purchase one four-hundredth of a Junior Participating
Cumulative Preferred Share (subject to a proportionate decrease
in the fractional number of Junior Participating Cumulative
Preferred Shares that may be purchased if a stock split, stock
dividend or similar transaction occurs with respect to the
common shares and a proportionate increase in the event of a
reverse stock split). Until a right is exercised, the holder of
the right has no right to vote or receive dividends or any other
rights as a shareholder as a result of holding the right. The
rights trade automatically with shares of Phelps Dodge common
stock and are designed to protect Phelps Dodges interests
and the interests of Phelps Dodges shareholders against
coercive takeover tactics. The rights are also designed to
encourage potential acquirors to negotiate with the Phelps Dodge
board of directors before attempting a takeover and to increase
the ability of the board of directors to negotiate terms of any
proposed takeover that benefit Phelps Dodges shareholders.
Preferred Stock
Phelps Dodge Preferred Stock Outstanding. As of the date
of this proxy statement, no shares of Phelps Dodge preferred
stock were issued and outstanding.
Authorized Preferred Stock. Under the Phelps Dodge
restated certificate of incorporation, the board of directors
has the authority, without shareholder approval, to create one
or more classes or series within a class of preferred stock, to
issue shares of preferred stock in such class or series up to
the maximum number of shares of the relevant class or series of
preferred stock authorized, and to determine the preferences,
rights, privileges and restrictions of any such class or series,
including the dividend rights, voting rights, the rights and
terms of redemption, the rights and terms of conversion,
liquidation
93
preferences, the number of shares constituting any such class or
series and the designation of such class or series. The board of
directors has designated a series of preferred stock as junior
participating cumulative preferred shares, and has issued rights
to purchase those shares which are exercisable only upon the
occurrence of certain events.
Transfer and Dividend Paying Agent and Registrar
Mellon Investor Services, L.L.C. is the transfer and dividend
paying agent and registrar for our common stock.
94
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND
MANAGEMENT
To the knowledge of Phelps Dodge, the following entities
beneficially owned in excess of 5% of the Phelps Dodge common
shares as of July 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of | |
|
|
Number of | |
|
Outstanding | |
Name and Address |
|
Shares(a) | |
|
Shares | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Atticus Management, L.L.C.(b)
|
|
|
20,151,800 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
% |
152 West 57th Street, 45th Floor
New York, NY 10019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Barclays Global Investors, NA(c) |
|
|
17,862,316 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
% |
45 Fremont Street
San Francisco, CA 94105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
On February 1, 2006, the company announced that the board
of directors had approved a two-for-one split of the
companys outstanding common stock, to be effected in the
form of a 100 percent stock dividend. Common shareholders
of record at the close of business on February 17, 2006,
received one additional share of common stock for every share
they owned as of the date. The additional shares were
distributed on March 10, 2006. The share numbers presented
in this table reflect the effect of this stock dividend, as
explained more fully in notes (b) and (c). |
|
(b) |
|
Reports on Schedule 13D/ A, dated February 15, 2006,
and December 2, 2005, disclosed that this entity, as a
registered investment adviser, had sole voting and dispositive
power over 10,075,900 shares which represented 9.9% of the
outstanding common shares, comprised of
(i) 5,210,900 shares of common stock and
(ii) 4,865,000 shares of common stock issuable upon
exercise of stock options. If the stock dividend referred to in
note (a) above had occurred on or prior to the date of the
report, this entity would have had voting and dispositive power
over 20,151,800 common shares, comprised of
(i) 10,421,800 shares of common stock and
9,730,000 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of
stock options. |
|
(c) |
|
A report on Schedule 13G, dated January 26, 2006,
disclosed that this entity, as a registered investment adviser,
had sole voting power over 7,868,320 shares and sole
dispositive power over 8,931,158 shares which represented
8.8% of the outstanding common shares at December 31, 2005.
If the stock dividend referred to in note (a) above had
occurred on or prior to the date of the report, this entity
would have had voting power over 15,736,640 common shares and
dispositive power over 17,862,316 common shares. |
95
SHARE OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The following table lists the common share ownership as of
July 31, 2006, for our directors and executive officers.
Beneficial Ownership includes shares a director or
officer has the power to vote or transfer, and stock options
that were exercisable on July 31, 2006, or within
60 days thereafter. On July 31, 2006, the directors
and the five named executive officers of Phelps Dodge owned, in
the aggregate, 950,197 shares of the common stock of Phelps
Dodge (less than 1% of the shares outstanding). Phelps
Dodges non-employee directors also have interests in
stock-based units under Phelps Dodges plans. While these
units may not be voted or transferred, they are listed in the
table below because they represent a component of the total
economic interest of our directors in the common stock of Phelps
Dodge.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares | |
|
Exercisable | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficially | |
|
Within | |
|
Stock | |
|
|
Name of Beneficial Owner |
|
Owned(a) | |
|
60 Days | |
|
Units(b) | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
S. David Colton
|
|
|
41,808 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
41,808 |
|
Archie W. Dunham
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
33,051 |
(c) |
|
|
33,051 |
|
William A. Franke
|
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
19,943 |
|
|
|
23,943 |
|
Robert D. Johnson
|
|
|
1,086 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
4,223 |
|
|
|
5,309 |
|
Marie L. Knowles
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
17,779 |
|
|
|
19,779 |
|
Charles C. Krulak
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1,080 |
|
|
|
1,080 |
|
Jon C. Madonna
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
4,223 |
|
|
|
6,223 |
|
Dustan E. McCoy
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Arthur R. Miele
|
|
|
38,942 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
38,942 |
|
Gordon R. Parker
|
|
|
8,538 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
18,089 |
|
|
|
26,627 |
|
Ramiro G. Peru
|
|
|
83,380 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
83,381 |
|
William J. Post
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
11,176 |
|
|
|
13,176 |
|
Martin H. Richenhagen
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Timothy R. Snider
|
|
|
104,549 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
104,549 |
|
Jack E. Thompson
|
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
4,223 |
|
|
|
8,223 |
|
J. Steven Whisler
|
|
|
362,306 |
|
|
|
181,800 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
544,106 |
|
Directors and executive officers as a group (18 persons)
|
|
|
708,211 |
|
|
|
183,134 |
|
|
|
113,787 |
|
|
|
1,005,132 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes, as of May 31, 2006, the following shares of
restricted stock awarded under the Phelps Dodge 1998 Stock
Option and Restricted Stock Plan and the Phelps Dodge 2003
Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan: Mr. Whisler,
227,250 shares, Mr. Snider, 76,558 shares,
Mr. Peru, 70,380 shares, Mr. Colton,
27,440 shares and Mr. Miele, 22,016 shares. |
|
|
(b) |
|
Except where indicated below, represents stock units awarded
under the Directors Stock Unit Plan. |
|
(c) |
|
Includes stock units credited under the Deferred Compensation
Plan for Directors of Phelps Dodge. |
96
FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
The U.S. securities laws provide a safe harbor
for certain forward-looking statements. This proxy statement
(including the documents attached as annexes and incorporated by
reference into this proxy statement) contains forward-looking
statements, including, without limitation, statements concerning
possible or assumed future results of operations of Phelps Dodge
and, Inco and the synergies expected to result from the
combination set forth under The Combination
Phelps Dodges Reasons for the Combination and
The Combination Opinions of Phelps
Dodges Financial Advisors beginning on page 39
and 42, respectively, of this proxy statement.
Frequently, but not always, forward-looking statements are
identified by the use of the future tense and by words such as
believes, expects,
anticipates, intends, will,
may, could, would,
projects, continues,
estimates, or similar expressions. Forward-looking
statements are not guarantees of future performance and actual
results could differ materially from those indicated by the
forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements involve
known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that
may cause Phelps Dodges and Incos or their
industrys actual results, levels of activity, performance
or achievements to be materially different from any future
results, levels of activity, performance or achievements
expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements.
Readers are cautioned that the following important factors, in
addition to those discussed under Risk Factors and
elsewhere in this proxy statement, and in the documents attached
as annexes to and incorporated by reference into this proxy
statement, could affect Phelps Dodges and Incos
future results and cause the future results of the combined
company to differ materially from those expressed in the
forward-looking statements.
|
|
|
|
|
the ability to obtain governmental approvals of the combination
on the proposed terms and schedule; |
|
|
|
the failure of Incos shareholders to approve the Plan of
Arrangement; |
|
|
|
the failure of Phelps Dodges shareholders to authorize
(i) the issuance of Phelps Dodge common stock,
(ii) the change of Phelps Dodge Corporations name to
Phelps Dodge Inco Corporation and (iii) an increase in the
size of Phelps Dodges board of directors as required under
the combination agreement; |
|
|
|
the risks that the businesses of Phelps Dodge and Inco will not
be integrated successfully; |
|
|
|
the risks that the cost savings, growth prospects and any other
synergies from the combination may not be fully realized or may
take longer to realize than expected; |
|
|
|
the combined companys inability to refinance indebtedness
incurred in connection with the combination on favorable terms
or at all; |
|
|
|
the combined companys inability to maintain positive
relations with its combined global work force; |
|
|
|
the possible impairment of goodwill resulting from the
combination and the resulting impact on the combined
companys assets and earnings; |
|
|
|
general U.S. and international economic, financial market and
political conditions; |
|
|
|
political and economic risks associated with operations outside
the U.S.; |
|
|
|
currency fluctuations; |
|
|
|
the cyclical and volatile price of copper and other commodities; |
|
|
|
the volatility in the price or availability of oil (the main
feedstock of our carbon black operations), diesel fuel,
electricity and natural gas; |
|
|
|
unanticipated ground, water, weather or operating conditions; |
|
|
|
force majeure events; |
97
|
|
|
|
|
unanticipated ore grade and geological problems; |
|
|
|
metallurgical and other processing problems; |
|
|
|
the availability of materials and equipment; |
|
|
|
delays in the receipt of or failure to receive necessary
government permits; |
|
|
|
changes in laws or regulations or the interpretation and
enforcement thereof; |
|
|
|
appeals of agency decisions or other litigation; |
|
|
|
labor relations and accidents; |
|
|
|
the ability to obtain satisfactory insurance coverage; and |
|
|
|
environmental risks. |
We can provide no assurance that the plans, intentions or
expectations upon which forward-looking statements are based
will occur. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date
of this proxy statement, in the case of forward-looking
statements contained in this proxy statement, as of the date of
the documents attached as annexes to this proxy statement, in
the case of forward-looking statements made in those attached
documents, or the dates of the documents incorporated by
reference, in the case of forward-looking statements made in
those incorporated documents. Except as may be required by law,
we have no obligations to update or alter these forward-looking
statements, whether as a result of new information, future
events or otherwise.
REGISTERED INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP or a predecessor firm has been the
independent accountants for Phelps Dodge since 1915. A
representative of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP will be present at
the special meeting with the opportunity to make a statement if
he or she so desires and to respond to appropriate questions.
98
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS
Pursuant to our By-Laws and the rules of the Securities and
Exchange Commission, shareholders may submit proposals that they
believe should be voted on at the annual meeting or may
recommend persons for nomination to the board of directors.
There are several alternatives a shareholder may use and a
summary of those alternatives follows.
Under Rule 14a-8
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, some shareholder
proposals may be eligible to be included in the Phelps
Dodge 2007 proxy statement. Shareholder proposals must be
submitted, along with proof of ownership of Phelps Dodge stock
in accordance with
Rule 14a-8(b)(2),
to our principal executive office, at Phelps Dodge, Attn:
Assistant General Counsel and Secretary, One North Central
Avenue, Phoenix, Arizona 85004. All shareholder proposals
submitted pursuant to
Rule 14a-8 must be
received by Phelps Dodge on or before December 15, 2006.
Alternatively, under our By-Laws, if a shareholder wishes to
appear at the 2007 Annual Shareholders Meeting and submit a
proposal or nominate a person as a director candidate, the
shareholder must provide specific information and meet the
required deadlines set forth in the By-Laws and summarized here.
These shareholder proposals and director nominations will not
appear in our proxy statement.
|
|
|
|
|
For both shareholder proposals and director nominations, the
proposing shareholder must deliver to the Secretary of Phelps
Dodge at its principal executive office a notice that includes
the shareholders name, address, and the number of shares
of stock the shareholder owns of record and beneficially. If the
shareholder holds shares through a nominee or street
name holder of record, the shareholder must deliver
evidence establishing the shareholders indirect ownership
of and entitlement to vote the shares. |
|
|
|
If a shareholder proposes to nominate any person for election as
director, the shareholder must also deliver to Phelps Dodge a
statement in writing setting forth the name, age and address of
the nominated person, the principal occupation or employment of
the nominated person, the number of shares of stock owned of
record and beneficially by the nominated person, the information
regarding the nominated person as required by
paragraphs (a), (d), (e) and (f) of Item 401 of
Regulation S-K
adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the
nominated persons signed consent to serve as a director of
Phelps Dodge if elected. Director nominations must be received
by Phelps Dodge no earlier than the close of business on
January 25, 2007, and no later than the close of business
on February 24, 2007. |
|
|
|
If the shareholder proposes another matter (other than the
nomination of a director), the shareholder must also deliver to
Phelps Dodge a description of the proposal and the reasons for
bringing the proposal before the annual meeting and a statement
identifying any material interest the shareholder has in the
matter proposed (other than as a shareholder). Proposals must be
received by Phelps Dodge no earlier than the close of business
on January 26, 2007, and no later than the close of
business on February 25, 2007. |
|
|
|
If the date of the 2007, annual meeting of shareholders is
changed, and the meeting is held before April 26, 2007, or
after July 25, 2007, notice of shareholder nominations of
directors or proposals that will not appear in Phelps
Dodges proxy statement must be received by Phelps Dodge at
its principal executive office no earlier than the close of
business on the 120th day prior to the new date of such
annual meeting and no later than the close of business on the
later of (i) the 90th day prior to the new date of
such meeting, and (ii) the 10th day following the day
on which a public announcement of the new date of such annual
meeting is first made. |
Phelps Dodge will not entertain any proposals or nominations at
the annual meeting that do not meet these requirements. If you
are planning to submit a proposal, please be sure to review
Phelps Dodges By-Laws and current SEC rules that are
applicable. If Phelps Dodge does not receive notice by the
required deadlines, or if it meets other requirements of the SEC
rules, the persons named as proxies in the proxy materials
relating to the 2007 Annual Shareholders Meeting will use their
discretion in voting the proxies when these matters are raised
at the meeting.
99
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION AND
INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE
Phelps Dodge and Inco file annual, quarterly and current
reports, and other information with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. You may read and copy any document Phelps Dodge or
Inco files at the Securities and Exchange Commissions
public reference rooms in Washington, D.C. Please call the
Securities and Exchange Commission at
1-800-SEC-0330 for
further information on the public reference room. These
Securities and Exchange Commission filings (other than
paper-only filings) are also available to the public at the
Securities and Exchange Commissions website at
http://www.sec.gov. Phelps Dodges filings are also
available at www.phelpsdodge.com and Incos filings are
also available at www.inco.com. Copies of documents filed by
Phelps Dodge and Inco with the Securities and Exchange
Commission are also available at the offices of The New York
Stock Exchange, 20 Broad Street, New York, New York 10005.
The Securities and Exchange Commission allows Phelps Dodge to
incorporate by reference into this document, documents that it
and Inco file with the Securities and Exchange Commission. This
means that, if you are a Phelps Dodge stockholder, Phelps Dodge
can disclose important information to you by referring you to
those documents.
The information filed by Phelps Dodge and Inco and incorporated
by reference is considered to be a part of this document, and
later information that Phelps Dodge and Inco file with the
Securities and Exchange Commission will update and supersede
that information. Statements contained in this document, or in
any document incorporated in this document by reference,
regarding the contents of any contract or other document are not
necessarily complete and each such statement is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such contract or other document filed
as an exhibit with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Phelps Dodge incorporates by reference the documents listed
below and any documents filed by Phelps Dodge and Inco pursuant
to Sections 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act,
after the date of this document and before the date of the
special meeting (other than portions of those documents not
deemed to be filed):
|
|
|
Phelps Dodge Filings: |
|
Periods: |
|
|
|
Annual Report on Form 10-K
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2005. |
Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q
|
|
Quarters ended June 30, 2006 and March 31, 2006. |
Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders
|
|
Filed on April 13, 2006. |
Current Reports on Form 8-K
|
|
Filed on August 14, 2006; July 28, 2006; July 26,
2006 (2 filings); July 18, 2006, July 17, 2006 (2
filings); July 5, 2006, June 29, 2006, June 28,
2006, June 26, 2006, June 2, 2006, April 10,
2006, March 17, 2006, March 9, 2006, February 14,
2006, February 7, 2006 and February 6, 2006. |
|
|
|
Inco Filings: |
|
Periods: |
|
|
|
Annual Report on Form 10-K
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2005. |
Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q
|
|
Quarters ended June 30, 2006 and March 31, 2006. |
To the extent that any information contained in any Current
Report on
Form 8-K, or any
exhibit thereto, was furnished to, rather than filed with, the
SEC, such information or exhibit is specifically not
incorporated by reference in this proxy statement.
The information concerning Inco contained in this proxy
statement and any documents filed by Inco with the SEC that are
incorporated by reference herein has been taken from or based
upon publicly available documents and records on file with the
SEC. Although Phelps Dodge has no knowledge that would indicate
any statements contained therein taken from or based upon such
documents and records are untrue or incomplete, neither Phelps
Dodge nor any of its officers or directors has independently
confirmed the accuracy or completeness of the information taken
from or based upon such documents or
100
records, or whether Inco has failed to disclose events that may
have occurred or may affect the significance or accuracy of any
such information.
You may request a copy of these documents by writing to or
telephoning Phelps Dodge at the contact information specified
below. Any such document, excluding any exhibits to those
documents unless the exhibit is specifically incorporated by
reference as an exhibit in this document will be provided,
without charge, by first class mail or equally prompt means,
within one business day of your request. Requests for documents
should be directed to:
|
|
|
Assistant General Counsel and Secretary |
|
Phelps Dodge Corporation |
|
One North Central Avenue |
|
Phoenix, AZ 85004-4414 |
|
Telephone
(602) 366-8100 |
If you would like to request documents, please do so at least
five business days before the date of the Phelps Dodge special
meeting in order to receive timely delivery of such documents
prior to the special meeting.
Phelps Dodge has not authorized anyone to give any information
or make any representation about the matters discussed in this
proxy statement that is different from, or in addition to, the
information contained in this proxy statement or in any of the
materials that are incorporated by reference into this proxy
statement. Therefore, if anyone does give you information of
this sort, you should not rely on it. The information contained
in this proxy statement speaks only as of the date of this proxy
statement unless the information specifically indicates that
another date applies.
101
Annex A
COMBINATION AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
PHELPS DODGE CORPORATION
AND
INCO LIMITED
Dated as of June 25, 2006
Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
|
|
| |
ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS |
|
|
A-1 |
|
|
1.1.
|
|
Certain Definitions |
|
|
A-1 |
|
|
1.2.
|
|
Terms Defined in Other Sections |
|
|
A-6 |
|
|
1.3.
|
|
Interpretation |
|
|
A-8 |
|
|
ARTICLE II THE ARRANGEMENT |
|
|
A-8 |
|
|
2.1.
|
|
The Arrangement |
|
|
A-8 |
|
|
2.2.
|
|
Implementation Steps by Italy |
|
|
A-9 |
|
|
2.3.
|
|
Implementation Steps by Portugal |
|
|
A-10 |
|
|
2.4.
|
|
Interim Order |
|
|
A-10 |
|
|
2.5.
|
|
Closing |
|
|
A-10 |
|
|
ARTICLE III REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF ITALY |
|
|
A-11 |
|
|
3.1.
|
|
Organization and Qualification; Subsidiaries |
|
|
A-11 |
|
|
3.2.
|
|
Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws |
|
|
A-12 |
|
|
3.3.
|
|
Capitalization |
|
|
A-12 |
|
|
3.4.
|
|
Authority Relative to this Agreement |
|
|
A-13 |
|
|
3.5.
|
|
No Conflict; Required Filings and Consents |
|
|
A-13 |
|
|
3.6.
|
|
Compliance; Permits |
|
|
A-14 |
|
|
3.7.
|
|
Reports; Financial Statements |
|
|
A-14 |
|
|
3.8.
|
|
No Undisclosed Liabilities |
|
|
A-16 |
|
|
3.9.
|
|
Absence of Certain Changes or Events |
|
|
A-16 |
|
|
3.10.
|
|
Absence of Litigation |
|
|
A-16 |
|
|
3.11.
|
|
Employee Plans |
|
|
A-16 |
|
|
3.12.
|
|
Labor Matters |
|
|
A-17 |
|
|
3.13.
|
|
Property and Title |
|
|
A-18 |
|
|
3.14.
|
|
Mineral Reserves and Resources |
|
|
A-18 |
|
|
3.15.
|
|
Operational Matters |
|
|
A-18 |
|
|
3.16.
|
|
Insurance |
|
|
A-18 |
|
|
3.17.
|
|
Taxes |
|
|
A-19 |
|
|
3.18.
|
|
Environmental Matters |
|
|
A-20 |
|
|
3.19.
|
|
Intellectual Property |
|
|
A-20 |
|
|
3.20.
|
|
Agreements, Contracts and Commitments |
|
|
A-21 |
|
|
3.21.
|
|
Brokers |
|
|
A-21 |
|
|
3.22.
|
|
Opinions of Financial Advisors |
|
|
A-21 |
|
|
3.23.
|
|
Vote Required |
|
|
A-21 |
|
|
3.24.
|
|
No Other Representations and Warranties |
|
|
A-22 |
|
ARTICLE IV REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF PORTUGAL |
|
|
A-22 |
|
|
4.1.
|
|
Organization and Qualification; Subsidiaries |
|
|
A-22 |
|
|
4.2.
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws |
|
|
A-23 |
|
|
4.3.
|
|
Capitalization |
|
|
A-23 |
|
|
4.4.
|
|
Authority Relative to this Agreement |
|
|
A-24 |
|
|
4.5.
|
|
No Conflict; Required Filings and Consents |
|
|
A-24 |
|
A-i
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
4.6.
|
|
Compliance; Permits |
|
|
A-25 |
|
|
4.7.
|
|
SEC Filings; Financial Statements |
|
|
A-25 |
|
|
4.8.
|
|
No Undisclosed Liabilities |
|
|
A-27 |
|
|
4.9.
|
|
Absence of Certain Changes or Events |
|
|
A-27 |
|
|
4.10.
|
|
Absence of Litigation |
|
|
A-27 |
|
|
4.11.
|
|
Employee Plans |
|
|
A-27 |
|
|
4.12.
|
|
Labor Matters |
|
|
A-28 |
|
|
4.13.
|
|
Property and Title |
|
|
A-28 |
|
|
4.14.
|
|
Mineral Reserves and Resources |
|
|
A-29 |
|
|
4.15.
|
|
Operational Matters |
|
|
A-29 |
|
|
4.16.
|
|
Insurance |
|
|
A-29 |
|
|
4.17.
|
|
Taxes |
|
|
A-30 |
|
|
4.18.
|
|
Environmental Matters |
|
|
A-30 |
|
|
4.19.
|
|
Intellectual Property |
|
|
A-31 |
|
|
4.20.
|
|
Agreements, Contracts and Commitments |
|
|
A-31 |
|
|
4.21.
|
|
Brokers |
|
|
A-32 |
|
|
4.22.
|
|
Vote Required |
|
|
A-32 |
|
|
4.23.
|
|
Portugal Common Shares |
|
|
A-32 |
|
|
4.24.
|
|
No Other Representations and Warranties |
|
|
A-32 |
|
|
ARTICLE V COVENANTS OF ITALY |
|
|
A-32 |
|
|
5.1.
|
|
Conduct of Business |
|
|
A-32 |
|
|
5.2.
|
|
Shareholders Meeting |
|
|
A-34 |
|
|
5.3.
|
|
No Solicitation; Opportunity to Match |
|
|
A-35 |
|
|
5.4.
|
|
Dissent Rights |
|
|
A-38 |
|
|
5.5.
|
|
Italy Affiliates |
|
|
A-38 |
|
|
5.6.
|
|
Preference Shares and Convertible Debentures |
|
|
A-38 |
|
|
ARTICLE VI COVENANTS OF PORTUGAL |
|
|
A-38 |
|
|
6.1.
|
|
Conduct of Business |
|
|
A-38 |
|
|
6.2.
|
|
Shareholders Meeting |
|
|
A-40 |
|
|
6.3.
|
|
Section 3(a)(10) Exemption |
|
|
A-40 |
|
|
6.4.
|
|
Stock Exchange Listings |
|
|
A-40 |
|
|
6.5.
|
|
Amendment to Governing Documents of Portugal |
|
|
A-40 |
|
|
6.6.
|
|
Board Composition |
|
|
A-40 |
|
|
6.7.
|
|
Certain Officers |
|
|
A-40 |
|
|
ARTICLE VII ADDITIONAL AGREEMENTS |
|
|
A-41 |
|
|
7.1.
|
|
Confidentiality; Access to Information |
|
|
A-41 |
|
|
7.2.
|
|
Cooperation in Filings |
|
|
A-41 |
|
|
7.3.
|
|
Public Announcements |
|
|
A-42 |
|
|
7.4.
|
|
Reasonable Best Efforts |
|
|
A-42 |
|
|
7.5.
|
|
Regulatory Filings |
|
|
A-43 |
|
|
7.6.
|
|
Indemnification |
|
|
A-44 |
|
|
7.7.
|
|
Takeover Statutes |
|
|
A-44 |
|
A-ii
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
7.8.
|
|
Section 16(b) |
|
|
A-44 |
|
|
7.9.
|
|
U.S. Tax Treatment |
|
|
A-44 |
|
|
ARTICLE VIII CONDITIONS |
|
|
A-45 |
|
|
8.1.
|
|
Conditions to Obligations of Each Party to Effect the Arrangement |
|
|
A-45 |
|
|
8.2.
|
|
Additional Conditions to Obligations of Italy |
|
|
A-45 |
|
|
8.3.
|
|
Additional Conditions to the Obligations of Portugal |
|
|
A-46 |
|
|
ARTICLE IX TERMINATION, AMENDMENT AND WAIVER |
|
|
A-47 |
|
|
9.1.
|
|
Termination |
|
|
A-47 |
|
|
9.2.
|
|
Notice of Termination; Effect of Termination |
|
|
A-47 |
|
|
9.3.
|
|
Fees and Expenses |
|
|
A-48 |
|
|
9.4.
|
|
Amendment |
|
|
A-50 |
|
|
9.5.
|
|
Extension; Waiver |
|
|
A-50 |
|
|
ARTICLE X GENERAL PROVISIONS |
|
|
A-51 |
|
|
10.1.
|
|
Non-Survival of Representations and Warranties |
|
|
A-51 |
|
|
10.2.
|
|
Notices |
|
|
A-51 |
|
|
10.3.
|
|
Counterparts |
|
|
A-52 |
|
|
10.4.
|
|
Entire Agreement; Third Party Beneficiaries |
|
|
A-52 |
|
|
10.5.
|
|
Severability |
|
|
A-52 |
|
|
10.6.
|
|
Other Remedies; Specific Performance |
|
|
A-52 |
|
|
10.7.
|
|
Governing Law |
|
|
A-52 |
|
|
10.8.
|
|
No Personal Liability |
|
|
A-53 |
|
|
10.9.
|
|
Assignment |
|
|
A-53 |
|
|
10.10.
|
|
WAIVER OF JURY TRIAL |
|
|
A-53 |
|
|
10.11.
|
|
Currency |
|
|
A-53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit A |
|
|
Form of Italy Resolution |
|
Exhibit B |
|
|
Form of Plan of Arrangement |
|
Exhibit C |
|
|
Form of Restated Certificate of Incorporation |
|
Exhibit D |
|
|
Form of Support Agreement Amendment |
|
Exhibit E |
|
|
Form of Portugal France Agreement |
|
Exhibit F |
|
|
Form of Convertible Note Purchase Agreement |
A-iii
COMBINATION AGREEMENT
This COMBINATION AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of
June 25, 2006, between Phelps Dodge Corporation, a New York
corporation (Portugal), and Inco Limited, a
corporation organized and existing under the laws of Canada
(Italy).
RECITALS
A. The board of directors of Italy has (i)
determined that it is in the best interests of Italy and its
shareholders to effect the business combination and other
transactions provided for herein, including the Arrangement
pursuant to which an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of
Portugal will acquire all of the outstanding common shares of
Italy and the shareholders of Italy immediately prior to the
effectiveness of the Arrangement will receive the consideration
described herein and in the Plan of Arrangement, and
(ii) resolved to recommend that the shareholders of
Italy vote in favour of the Arrangement.
B. The board of directors of Portugal has (i) deemed
it advisable and in the best interests of Portugal and its
shareholders to effect the business combination and other
transactions provided for herein, including the Portugal Share
Issuance and the Portugal Charter Amendment, and (ii)
resolved to recommend that the shareholders of Portugal vote in
favor of the Portugal Share Issuance and the Portugal Charter
Amendment.
C. Contemporaneously with the execution and delivery of
this Agreement, (i) Italy and Falconbridge Limited, a
corporation organized and existing under the laws of Ontario
(France), have entered into an amendment to
the Support Agreement between them in the form set forth as
Exhibit D hereto, (ii) Portugal and France have
entered into an Agreement in the form set forth as
Exhibit E, and (iii) Italy and Portugal have
entered into the Convertible Note Purchase Agreement in the
form set forth in Exhibit F hereto.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants, promises and
representations set forth herein, and for other good and
valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are
hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:
ARTICLE I
DEFINITIONS
1.1. Certain
Definitions. The following terms shall have the
following meanings:
|
|
|
1933 Act means the United States
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the rules and
regulations promulgated from time to time thereunder. |
|
|
1934 Act means the United States
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the rules and
regulations promulgated from time to time thereunder. |
|
|
Action means any action, claim, suit,
litigation, demand, cause of action, charge, complaint,
arbitration or other proceeding. |
|
|
Affiliate means, with respect to any
Person, any other Person that directly, or through one or more
intermediaries, controls or is controlled by or is under common
control with such Person. For purposes of the foregoing,
control means the possession, direct or indirect, of
the power to direct or cause the direction of the management and
policies of a person, whether through the ownership of voting
securities, by contract, or otherwise. For the avoidance of
doubt, a Subsidiary of any Person shall be deemed to be an
Affiliate of such Person, and such Person shall be deemed to be
an Affiliate of such Subsidiary. |
|
|
Agreement means this Combination
Agreement, including the Exhibits and schedules hereto, as the
same may be amended, supplemented or otherwise modified from
time to time in accordance with the terms hereof. |
A-1
|
|
|
ARC means an advance ruling
certificate issued by the Commissioner pursuant to
Section 102 of the Competition Act. |
|
|
Arrangement means an arrangement under
section 192 of the CBCA on the terms and subject to the
conditions set out in the Plan of Arrangement, subject to any
amendments or variations thereto made in accordance with
Section 9.4 hereof or Article VII of the Plan of
Arrangement or made at the direction of the Court in the Final
Order. |
|
|
Articles of Arrangement means the
articles of arrangement of Italy in respect of the Arrangement,
required by the CBCA to be sent to the Director after the Final
Order is made. |
|
|
CBCA means the Canada Business
Corporations Act, as now in effect and as it may be amended from
time to time prior to the Effective Time. |
|
|
Canadian Securities Regulatory
Authorities means the OSC and each other
securities commission or similar regulatory authority in each of
the provinces and territories of Canada. |
|
|
Code means the United States Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. |
|
|
Commissioner means the Commissioner of
Competition under the Competition Act. |
|
|
Competition Act means the Competition
Act (Canada), as amended. |
|
|
Competition Act Approval means receipt
of an ARC or, in the alternative to an ARC, the waiver,
expiration or earlier termination of the waiting period under
Part IX of the Competition Act and receipt of a letter from
the Commissioner or a person authorized by the Commissioner that
the Commissioner has determined not to make an application for
an order under section 92 of the Competition Act in respect
of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. |
|
|
Contract means any written agreement,
commitment, contract, note, bond, mortgage, indenture, lease,
instrument or other binding arrangement. |
|
|
Court means the Superior Court of
Justice (Ontario). |
|
|
Director means the Director appointed
pursuant to section 260 of the CBCA. |
|
|
Disclosed Publicly by Italy means
disclosed in a public filing by Italy with the OSC on or after
January 1, 2004 and prior to the date hereof. |
|
|
Disclosed Publicly by Portugal means
disclosed in a public filing by Portugal with the SEC on or
after January 1, 2004 and prior to the date hereof. |
|
|
Disclosed to Italy means disclosed by
Portugal in the Portugal Dataroom or made available in writing
by Portugal to Italy. |
|
|
Disclosed to Portugal means disclosed
by Italy in the Italy Dataroom or made available in writing by
Italy to Portugal. |
|
|
Dissent Rights means the rights of
dissent in respect of the Arrangement described in
Article IV of the Plan of Arrangement. |
|
|
Effective Time has the meaning
ascribed thereto in the Plan of Arrangement. |
|
|
Employee Plan means, with respect to
any Person, any employee benefit plan, as defined in
Section 3(3) of ERISA, and any stock purchase, stock
option, stock appreciation, stock incentive, phantom stock,
severance, termination, employment,
change-in-control,
retention, insurance (including self-insurance), split-dollar,
health, medical, disability, sick pay, workers compensation,
supplemental unemployment, post-employment, pension, savings,
retirement, profit sharing, vacation, fringe benefit,
multiemployer, collective bargaining, bonus, incentive, deferred
compensation, loan and any other employee benefit plan,
agreement, program, policy or other arrangement (including any
funding mechanism therefor now in effect or required in the
future as a result of the transactions |
A-2
|
|
|
contemplated by this Agreement or otherwise), whether or not
subject to ERISA, whether formal or informal. |
|
|
Environmental Laws means all Laws and
Orders of any international, provincial, federal, state, local
and any other Governmental Entity that relate to the protection
of the environment, protection of wildlife and/or wildlife
habitat, protection of cultural or historic resources, including
those relating to reclamation, remediation or restoration of
mineral or other properties, the natural environment or to the
presence, use, production, generation, handling, transportation,
treatment, storage, disposal, distribution, labeling, testing,
processing, discharge, release, threatened release, control, or
cleanup of any Hazardous Substances, or to the impact of
Hazardous Substances on the environment, health or property. |
|
|
Environmental Lien means any Lien in
favor of any Governmental Entity arising under Environmental
Laws. |
|
|
ERISA means the Employee Retirement
Income Security Act of 1974, as amended. |
|
|
ERISA Affiliate means, with respect to
any Person, any trade or business (whether or not incorporated)
which is a member of a controlled group or which is under common
control with such Person within the meaning of Section 414
of the Code. |
|
|
France Subsequent Acquisition
Transaction means the acquisition by Italy of the
common shares of France held by Persons who have not accepted
the Italy Bid in the manner contemplated under the heading
Acquisition of France Shares Not Deposited in the
Italy Bid Circular. |
|
|
Final Order means the final order of
the Court approving the Arrangement, as such order may be
amended or varied at any time prior to the Effective Time or, if
appealed, then unless such appeal is withdrawn or denied, as
affirmed or as amended on appeal. |
|
|
Governmental Entity means any
(a) multinational, federal, provincial, state, regional,
municipal or other government, or governmental department,
central bank, court, tribunal, arbitrator, commission, board,
bureau or agency, whether U.S., Canadian, foreign or
multinational, (b) subdivision, agent, commission,
board or authority of any of the foregoing or (c) stock
exchange, including the NYSE or TSX. |
|
|
Hazardous Substance means any
chemical, material or substance in any form, whether solid,
liquid, gaseous, semisolid or any combination thereof, whether
waste material, raw material, finished product, intermediate
product, byproduct or any other material or article, that is
listed or regulated under any applicable Environmental Laws as a
hazardous substance, toxic substance, waste or contaminant or is
otherwise listed or regulated under any applicable Environmental
Laws because it poses a hazard to human health or the
environment, including petroleum products, asbestos, PCBs, urea
formaldehyde foam insulation and lead-containing paints or
coatings. |
|
|
ICA means the Investment Canada Act
(Canada), as amended, and the regulations thereunder. |
|
|
ICA Approval means the determination
or deemed approval by the Minister responsible for the
administration of the ICA that the transactions contemplated
hereby are of net benefit to Canada pursuant to
Part IV of the ICA. |
|
|
In the Money Amount in respect of a
stock option at any time means the amount, if any, by which the
aggregate fair market value at that time of the securities
subject to the option exceeds the aggregate exercise price under
the stock option. |
|
|
Intellectual Property means all
federal, state, provincial, foreign and multinational
intellectual and industrial property rights, including without
limitation, all (i) patents; (ii) copyrights;
(iii) trademarks and service marks, the goodwill of
any business symbolized thereby, and all common-law rights
relating thereto; (iv) trade secrets; and (v) all
registrations, applications, and recordings related to the
foregoing. |
A-3
|
|
|
Interim Order means the interim order
of the Court, as the same may be amended in respect of the
Arrangement, as contemplated by Section 2.4. |
|
|
ITA means the Income Tax Act (Canada),
as amended, and the regulations thereunder, as amended, in each
case, except as otherwise provided herein, as of the date hereof. |
|
|
Italy Bid means the offer, as the same
may be amended from time to time, by Italy to acquire all of the
outstanding common shares of France as described in the Italy
Bid Circular. |
|
|
Italy Bid Circular means the take-over
bid circular of Italy dated October 24, 2005, as the same
has been amended or varied and as the same may be amended or
varied from time to time, relating to the Italy Bid. |
|
|
Italy Dataroom means the electronic
dataroom relating to Italy to which Portugal has had access
prior to the date hereof. |
|
|
Italy Employee Plan means any Employee
Plan under which (i) any current or former director,
officer, consultant or employee of Italy or any of its
Subsidiaries (or any of their beneficiaries or dependants) has
any present or future right to benefits and which is contributed
to, entered into, sponsored by or maintained by Italy, any of
its Subsidiaries or any of their ERISA Affiliates or
(ii) Italy or any of its Subsidiaries has or reasonably
would be expected to have any present or future liability. |
|
|
Italy Meeting means the special
meeting of holders of Italy Common Shares, including any
adjournment or postponement thereof, to be called and held in
accordance with the Interim Order to consider the Arrangement
and other matters related to this Agreement and the Arrangement. |
|
|
Italy Option Plans means the stock
option or incentive plans for directors, officers and employees
of Italy and its Subsidiaries and other eligible persons (as
applicable). |
|
|
Italy Resolution means the special
resolution of the holders of the Italy Common Shares, to be
substantially in the form of Exhibit A hereto. |
|
|
Italy SAR means a stock appreciation
right included in an Italy Option and exercisable in lieu of
(but not in addition to) such Italy Option. |
|
|
knowledge of Italy, means the actual
knowledge of the Persons set forth in Section 1.2 of the
Italy Disclosure Schedule, and of Portugal, means the actual
knowledge of the Persons set forth in Section 1.2 of the
Portugal Disclosure Schedule. |
|
|
Laws means laws (including common
law), statutes, rules, regulations, orders, ordinances, codes,
treaties, and judicial, arbitral, administrative, ministerial or
departmental judgments, awards or other requirements of any
Governmental Entity. |
|
|
Lien means, with respect to any
property, right or asset, any mortgage, lien, pledge, charge,
security interest, purchase option, right of first offer or
refusal, encumbrance or other adverse claim of any kind in
respect of such property or asset. |
|
|
Material Adverse Effect means, with
respect to each party, any fact, change, event, occurrence or
effect (a) that is or would reasonably be expected to be
materially adverse to the condition (financial or otherwise),
properties, assets, liabilities, obligations (whether absolute,
accrued, conditional or otherwise), businesses, operations or
results of operations of such party, its Subsidiaries and its
material joint ventures, taken as a whole, other than any such
fact, change, event, occurrence or effect relating to
(i) the announcement of the execution of this Agreement or
the transactions contemplated hereby, including the consummation
of the acquisition of common shares of France as contemplated by
the Support Agreement and this Agreement, the exercise of
dissent rights in connection with any subsequent acquisition
transaction, and any divestitures or other actions required to
obtain all necessary regulatory approvals relating thereto,
(ii) changes, circumstances or conditions generally
affecting the mining industry and not having a materially
disproportionate effect on such |
A-4
|
|
|
party, (iii) changes in general economic conditions in the
United States or Canada, (iv) changes in any of the
principal markets served by such partys business generally
or shortages or price changes with respect to raw materials,
metals or other products (including, but not limited to, nickel,
copper, cobalt, molybdenum, any platinum-group metals, sulfur,
sulphuric acid, electricity, zinc or aluminum) used or sold by
that party, (v) changes in generally applicable Laws or
regulations (other than orders, judgments or decrees against
such party, any of its Subsidiaries or any of its material joint
ventures), or (vi) changes in US GAAP or Canadian GAAP or
(b) that as of the date hereof is, or would reasonably be
expected to be, materially adverse to the ability of such party
to consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement;
provided, however, that in no event shall (A) a change in
the trading prices of a partys equity securities, or
(B) any failure by a party, including France, to meet any
internal or published projections, forecasts or revenue or
synergy or earnings predictions (collectively
Estimates) by itself, be deemed to constitute a
Material Adverse Effect (it being understood that the foregoing
shall not prevent a party from asserting that any fact, change,
event, occurrence or effect that may have contributed to such
change in trading prices or Estimates independently constitutes
a Material Adverse Effect); it being understood and agreed that,
after the consummation of the acquisition of common shares of
France as contemplated by the Support Agreement and this
Agreement, for purposes of determining whether a Material
Adverse Effect with respect to Italy shall have occurred, the
financial condition, business and results of operations of Italy
shall be deemed to include the financial condition, business and
results of operations of Italy, France and their collective
Subsidiaries and material joint ventures, taken as a whole. |
|
|
NYSE means The New York Stock
Exchange, Inc. |
|
|
OBCA means the Business Corporations
Act (Ontario), as now in effect and as it may be amended from
time to time prior to the Effective Time. |
|
|
Order means any legally enforceable
judgment, order, decision, writ, injunction, stipulation, ruling
or decree of, or any settlement under jurisdiction of, any
Governmental Entity. |
|
|
OSC means the Ontario Securities
Commission. |
|
|
Person shall mean any individual,
corporation (including any non-profit corporation), general
partnership, limited partnership, limited liability partnership,
joint venture, estate, trust, company (including any limited
liability company, unlimited liability company or joint stock
company), firm or other enterprise, association, organization,
entity or Governmental Entity. |
|
|
Plan of Arrangement means, subject to
Section 2.2(a), the plan of arrangement, substantially in
the form of Exhibit B hereto as amended by any amendments
or variations thereto made in accordance with Section 9.4
hereof or Article VII of the Plan of Arrangement or made at
the direction of the Court in the Final Order. |
|
|
Portugal Charter Amendment means the
amendment and restatement of the certificate of incorporation of
Portugal so that, after giving effect thereto, the certificate
of incorporation of Portugal shall be substantially in the form
set forth as Exhibit C. |
|
|
Portugal Dataroom means the electronic
dataroom relating to Portugal to which Italy has had access
prior to the date hereof. |
|
|
Portugal Employee Plan means any
Employee Plan under which (i) any current or former
director, officer, consultant or employee of Portugal or any of
its Subsidiaries (or any of their beneficiaries or dependants)
has any present or future right to benefits and which is
contributed to, entered into, sponsored by or maintained by
Portugal, any of its Subsidiaries or any of their ERISA
Affiliates or (ii) Portugal or any of its Subsidiaries
has or reasonably would be expected to have any present or
future liability. |
|
|
Portugal Meeting means the special
meeting of holders of Portugal Common Shares, including any
adjournment or postponement thereof, to be called to consider
the Portugal Charter Amendment and the Portugal Share Issuance. |
A-5
|
|
|
Portugal Share Issuance means the
issuance of Portugal Common Shares pursuant to the Arrangement. |
|
|
Proprietary Subject Matter means:
(i) all information (whether or not protectable by
patent, copyright, mask work or trade secret rights) not
generally known to the public, including know-how and show-how,
discoveries, processes, formulae, designs, methods, techniques,
procedures, concepts, specifications, technical manuals and
data, libraries, blueprints, drawings, product information,
development
work-in-process,
inventions and trade secrets; (ii) patentable subject
matter, patented inventions and inventions subject to patent
applications; (iii) industrial models and industrial
designs; (iv) works of authorship, software and
copyrightable subject matter; (v) mask works; and
(vi) trademarks, trade names, service marks, brand
names, corporate names, emblems, logos, trade dress, domain
names, insignia and related marks. |
|
|
Regulatory Approvals means, with
respect to a party, those Orders, sanctions, consents,
exemptions, waivers, permits, agreements, certificates,
authorizations and other Approvals (including the lapse, without
objection, of a prescribed time under a statute or regulation
that states that a transaction may be implemented if a
prescribed time lapses following the giving of notice without an
objection being made) of Governmental Entities that are
necessary or advisable in connection with the transactions
contemplated hereby, including, in the case of Italy, those
referred to in Section 3.5(b) hereof and, in the case of
Portugal, those referred to in Section 4.5(b) hereof. |
|
|
Securities Act (Ontario) means the
Securities Act (Ontario) and all rules and regulations enacted
thereunder, as now in effect and as it may be amended from time
to time prior to the Effective Time. |
|
|
SEC means the United States Securities
and Exchange Commission. |
|
|
Securities Laws means the Securities
Act (Ontario) and the equivalent legislation in the other
provinces and territories of Canada, the 1933 Act, and the
1934 Act, all as now enacted or as the same may from time
to time be amended, and the applicable rules and regulations
promulgated thereunder. |
|
|
Stock Award Exchange Ratio means the
sum of (i) the Share Exchange Ratio plus (ii) the
fraction resulting from dividing the Per Share Cash Amount by
the closing price of the Portugal Common Shares on the NYSE on
the last trading day immediately preceding the Closing Date
expressed in Canadian dollars based upon the noon buying rate of
the Bank of Canada on such date. |
|
|
Subsidiary shall mean, when used with
reference to any party, any Person of which such party (either
alone or through or together with any other Subsidiary) either
owns, directly or indirectly, fifty percent (50%) or more of the
outstanding capital stock or other equity interests the holders
of which are generally entitled to vote for the election of
directors or members of any other governing body of such Person
or, in the case of a Person that is a partnership, is a general
partner of such partnership, or any Person the accounts of which
such party is required to consolidate in its own financial
statements under the generally accepted accounting principles
applicable to such party. |
|
|
Support Agreement means the Support
Agreement, dated October 10, 2005, between Italy and
France, as amended from time to time (including pursuant to
amendments dated January 12, 2006, February 20, 2006,
March 21, 2006, May 13, 2006 and the date hereof). |
|
|
TSX means The Toronto Stock Exchange. |
1.2. Terms Defined in Other
Sections. The following terms are defined elsewhere in
this Agreement in the following Sections:
|
|
|
Acquisition Proposal
|
|
Section 5.3(j) |
Approvals
|
|
Section 3.1(a) |
Canadian GAAP
|
|
Section 3.7(b) |
Change in Italy Recommendation
|
|
Section 5.2(c) |
A-6
|
|
|
Change in Portugal Recommendation
|
|
Section 6.2(c) |
Change in Recommendation
|
|
Section 6.2(c) |
Closing Date
|
|
Section 2.5(a) |
Collective Agreements
|
|
Section 3.12(a) |
Confidentiality Agreements
|
|
Section 7.1(a) |
Converted Portugal Option
|
|
Section 2.1(c) |
Converted Portugal Option Exercise Price
|
|
Section 2.1(c) |
DOJ
|
|
Section 7.5 |
European Commission
|
|
Section 7.5 |
Expenses
|
|
Section 9.3(d) |
France
|
|
Recitals |
France Condition
|
|
Section 8.1(g) |
FTC
|
|
Section 7.5 |
HSR Act
|
|
Section 3.5(b) |
Indemnified Parties
|
|
Section 7.6 |
Infringe
|
|
Section 3.19 |
IRD
|
|
Section 7.5 |
Italy
|
|
Preamble |
Italy Charter Documents
|
|
Section 3.2 |
Italy Circular
|
|
Section 5.2(b) |
Italy Common Shares
|
|
Section 3.3(a) |
Italy Competing Proposal
|
|
Section 9.3(d) |
Italy Disclosure Schedule
|
|
Article III |
Italy Documents
|
|
Section 3.7(a) |
Italy Environmental Permits
|
|
Section 3.18(c) |
Italy Financial Statements
|
|
Section 3.7(b) |
Italy Insurance Policies
|
|
Section 3.16 |
Italy Intellectual Property
|
|
Section 3.19 |
Italy Options
|
|
Section 3.3(a) |
Italy Preferred Shares
|
|
Section 3.3(a) |
Italy Property
|
|
Section 3.18(a) |
Italy Restricted Shares
|
|
Section 3.3(a) |
Italy Returns
|
|
Section 3.17(b)(i) |
Italy Shareholder Approval
|
|
Section 2.4(b) |
Italy Termination Fee
|
|
Section 9.3(d) |
Italy-Used Proprietary Subject Matter
|
|
Section 3.19 |
KEIP Plans
|
|
Section 3.3(a) |
LYON Notes
|
|
Section 3.3(a) |
Material Italy Contract
|
|
Section 3.20 |
Material Portugal Contract
|
|
Section 4.20 |
Permit
|
|
Section 3.5(a) |
Per Share Cash Amount
|
|
Section 2.1(a)(ii) |
Portugal
|
|
Preamble |
Portugal Canada
|
|
Section 2.1(a) |
Portugal Charter Documents
|
|
Section 4.2 |
A-7
|
|
|
Portugal Competing Proposal
|
|
Section 9.3(d) |
Portugal Common Shares
|
|
Section 4.3(a) |
Portugal Disclosure Schedule
|
|
Article IV |
Portugal Environmental Permits
|
|
Section 4.18(c) |
Portugal Financial Statements
|
|
Section 4.7(b) |
Portugal Insurance Policies
|
|
Section 4.16 |
Portugal Intellectual Property
|
|
Section 4.19 |
Portugal Preferred Shares
|
|
Section 4.3(a) |
Portugal Property
|
|
Section 4.18(a) |
Portugal Proxy Statement
|
|
Section 6.2(b) |
Portugal Returns
|
|
Section 4.17(a)(i) |
Portugal SEC Reports
|
|
Section 4.7(a) |
Portugal Stockholder Approval
|
|
Section 4.22 |
Portugal Termination Fee
|
|
Section 9.3(d) |
Portugal-Used Proprietary Subject Matter
|
|
Section 4.19 |
Sarbanes-Oxley Act
|
|
Section 3.7(c) |
Share Exchange Ratio
|
|
Section 2.1(a)(ii) |
Shareholder Solicitations
|
|
Section 7.2(a) |
Superior Proposal
|
|
Section 5.3(j) |
Support Agreement Contracts
|
|
Section 3.20(b) |
Takeover Statute
|
|
Section 7.7 |
Tax
|
|
Section 3.17(a) |
Tax Pools
|
|
Section 3.17(b)(iv) |
Termination Date
|
|
Section 9.1(b) |
US GAAP
|
|
Section 4.7(b) |
1.3. Interpretation.
When a reference is made in this Agreement to Exhibits, such
reference shall be to an Exhibit to this Agreement unless
otherwise indicated. When a reference is made in this Agreement
to Sections, such reference shall be to a Section of this
Agreement unless otherwise indicated. Unless otherwise
indicated, the words include, includes
and including when used herein shall be deemed in
each case to be followed by the words without
limitation. The table of contents and headings contained
in this Agreement are for reference purposes only and shall not
affect in any way the meaning or interpretation of this
Agreement. When reference is made herein to the business
of a Person, such reference shall be deemed to include the
business of such Person and all direct and indirect Subsidiaries
of such Person taken as a whole. Reference to the Subsidiaries
of a Person shall be deemed to include all direct and indirect
Subsidiaries of such Person.
ARTICLE II
THE ARRANGEMENT
2.1. The Arrangement.
Subject to the terms hereof, at the Effective Time and as more
fully set forth in the Plan of Arrangement:
|
|
|
(a) A newly-formed, Canadian wholly-owned Subsidiary of
Portugal (Portugal Canada) will
acquire all outstanding Italy Common Shares; Italy and Portugal
Canada will amalgamate; and each outstanding Italy Common Share
(other than (x) Italy Common Shares held by a holder who
has validly exercised its Dissent Rights or by Portugal or any
Subsidiary of Portugal and (y) the Italy Restricted
Shares) will be exchanged by the holder thereof for: |
A-8
|
|
|
(i) 0.672 Portugal Common Shares (the Share
Exchange Ratio), plus |
|
|
(ii) Cdn.$17.50 in cash (the Per Share Cash
Amount). |
|
|
|
(b) Each Italy Restricted Share granted under the KEIP
Plans and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time
will be exchanged for the number of restricted Portugal Common
Shares (on the same terms and conditions as were applicable
prior to the Effective Time to such award of Italy Restricted
Shares pursuant to the relevant KEIP Plan under which such Italy
Restricted Share was issued and the agreement evidencing the
grant thereof) equal to the Stock Award Exchange Ratio. |
|
|
(c) Each Italy Option outstanding immediately prior to the
Effective Time, whether or not vested, shall be exchanged for a
fully vested option granted by Portugal (a Converted
Portugal Option) to acquire (on the same terms and
conditions, other than vesting, as were applicable to such Italy
Option pursuant to the relevant Italy Option Plan under which it
was issued and the agreement evidencing the grant thereof prior
to the Effective Time) the number (rounded down to the nearest
whole number) of Portugal Common Shares determined by
multiplying (A) the number of Italy Common Shares subject
to such Italy Option immediately prior to the Effective Time by
(B) the Stock Award Exchange Ratio. The exercise price per
Portugal Common Share subject to any such Converted Portugal
Option (the Converted Portugal Option Exercise
Price) will be an amount (rounded up to the nearest
one hundredth of a cent) equal to the quotient of (A) the
exercise price per Italy Common Share subject to such Italy
Option immediately prior to the Effective Time and (B) the
Stock Award Exchange Ratio, expressed in U.S. dollars based
on the noon buying rate of the Bank of Canada on the last
trading day immediately preceding the Closing Date; provided
that the exercise price otherwise determined shall be increased
to the extent, if any, required to ensure that the In The Money
Amount of the Converted Portugal Option immediately after the
exchange is equal to the in the Money Amount of the
corresponding Italy Option immediately before the exchange. The
conversion mechanism set forth in this Section 2.1(c) shall
be adjusted to the extent required to comply with
Section 409A of the Code and the rules, regulations and
guidance promulgated thereunder, where applicable. |
|
|
(d) For greater certainty, if a particular Italy Option
includes an Italy SAR, the corresponding Converted Portugal
Option will include a stock appreciation right subject to the
same terms and conditions (other than vesting) as were
applicable to the Italy SAR except that the stock appreciation
right, which may be exercised in lieu of, but not in addition to
the Converted Portugal Option shall represent the right to
receive, upon exercise (and consequent surrender of the
Converted Portugal Option), (i) the number of Portugal
Common Shares (rounded down to the nearest whole share) having
an aggregate fair market value on the date of exercise equal to
the positive difference between (A) the aggregate fair
market value of the Portugal Common Shares subject to the
corresponding Converted Portugal Option and (B) the
aggregate Converted Portugal Option exercise price,
(ii) the equivalent amount of cash, or (iii) an
equivalent combination thereof, as Portugal may determine in its
sole discretion. The conversion mechanism in relation to the
Italy SAR shall be adjusted as necessary to the extent required
to comply with section 409A of the Code and the rules,
regulations and guidance promulgated thereunder, where
applicable. |
2.2. Implementation Steps by
Italy. Italy covenants in favor of Portugal that Italy
shall:
|
|
|
(a) subject to the terms of this Agreement and the
preparation of a substantially complete Italy Circular in
accordance with Section 5.2 of this Agreement, as soon as
reasonably practicable, apply in a manner reasonably acceptable
to Portugal under Section 192 of the CBCA for an order
approving the Arrangement and for the Interim Order, and
thereafter proceed with and diligently seek the Interim Order.
Notwithstanding that this Agreement contemplates that the
Arrangement will be implemented under the CBCA, the parties
agree that the Arrangement may, if the parties consider it to be
appropriate in the circumstances, be effected under the OBCA
with necessary modifications to the Plan of Arrangement and
without any requirement to amend or otherwise modify this
Agreement. In such event, at the option of Portugal, the Plan of
Arrangement may be modified at any time prior |
A-9
|
|
|
to the Italy Meeting to provide that the France Subsequent
Acquisition Transaction shall be completed as part of the
Arrangement; |
|
|
(b) subject to the terms of this Agreement and in
accordance with the Interim Order, as soon as reasonably
practicable, convene and hold the Italy Meeting for the purpose
of considering the Italy Resolution; |
|
|
(c) provided that Italy has taken up and paid for not less
than
662/3
% of the outstanding common shares of France pursuant to
the Italy Bid, to use its reasonable best efforts, in
consultation and with the prior approval of Portugal, to
complete a France Subsequent Acquisition Transaction as soon as
practicable and in any event prior to the Effective Time; |
|
|
(d) subject to obtaining such approvals as are required by
the Interim Order, proceed with and diligently pursue the
application to the Court for the Final Order; and |
|
|
(e) subject to obtaining the Final Order and the
satisfaction or waiver of the other conditions herein contained
in favor of each party, send to the Director, for endorsement
and filing by the Director, the Articles of Arrangement and such
other documents as may be required in connection therewith under
the CBCA to give effect to the Arrangement. |
2.3. Implementation Steps by
Portugal. Portugal covenants in favor of Italy that:
|
|
|
(a) subject to the terms of this Agreement, Portugal shall,
as soon as reasonably practicable, convene and hold the Portugal
Meeting for the purpose of considering the Portugal Share
Issuance and the Portugal Charter Amendment; |
|
|
(b) subject to obtaining the Final Order and the
satisfaction or waiver of the other conditions herein contained
in favor of each party, on the Closing Date and prior to the
Effective Time, Portugal shall file the restated certificate of
incorporation of Portugal, in the form set forth in
Exhibit C hereto, with the Secretary of State of the State
of New York. |
2.4. Interim Order.
The notice of motion for the application referred to in
Section 2.2(a) shall request that the Interim Order provide:
|
|
|
(a) for the class of Persons to whom notice is to be
provided in respect of the Arrangement and the Italy Meeting and
for the manner in which such notice is to be provided; |
|
|
(b) that, subject to the approval of the Court, the
requisite approval for the Italy Resolution shall be
662/3%
of the votes cast on the Italy Resolution by holders of Italy
Common Shares present in person or by proxy at the Italy Meeting
(the Italy Shareholder Approval); |
|
|
(c) that, in all other respects, the terms, restrictions
and conditions of the Italy Charter Documents, including quorum
requirements and all other matters, shall apply in respect of
the Italy Meeting; |
|
|
(d) for the grant of the Dissent Rights; and |
|
|
(e) for the notice requirements with respect to the
presentation of the application to the Court for a Final Order. |
2.5. Closing.
(a) The closing of the transactions contemplated hereby
will take place at 8:00 am, Eastern Time, at the offices of
Debevoise & Plimpton LLP, 919 Third Avenue, New York,
NY 10022, on the second business day after the satisfaction or
waiver (subject to applicable Laws) of the conditions set forth
in Article VIII (excluding conditions that, by their terms,
cannot be satisfied until the Closing Date, but subject to the
satisfaction or, where permitted, waiver of those conditions as
of the Closing Date), or such other date, time and place as is
agreed to in writing by the parties hereto (such date, the
Closing Date).
(b) On the Closing Date, the Articles of Arrangement shall
be filed with the Director. The Articles of Arrangement shall
implement the Plan of Arrangement.
A-10
(c) At the Effective Time, each Italy Common Share
outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time will be
exchanged or converted, as provided in the Plan of Arrangement,
and the Arrangement will, from and after the Effective Time,
have all of the effects provided by applicable Laws, including
the CBCA.
ARTICLE III
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF ITALY
Italy represents and warrants to Portugal, subject to such
exceptions as are specifically disclosed in writing in the
disclosure schedule (arranged in sections and subsections
corresponding to the numbered and lettered sections and
subsections contained in this Article III with the
disclosures in any section or subsection of such schedule
qualifying the corresponding section or subsection in this
Article III, as well as any other section or subsection of
this Article III if the relevance of the disclosed item to
such other section or subsection is reasonably apparent on its
face) supplied by Italy to Portugal dated as of the date hereof
(the Italy Disclosure Schedule), as follows:
3.1. Organization and
Qualification; Subsidiaries.
(a) Each of Italy and its Subsidiaries that is a
corporation or other legal entity is duly organized, validly
existing and in good standing under the Laws of the jurisdiction
of its incorporation and has the requisite corporate,
partnership or similar power and authority to own, lease and
operate its assets and properties and to carry on its business
as now conducted, except where the failure to do so has not had
and would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in
the aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect with respect to Italy.
Each of Italy and its Subsidiaries is in possession of all
franchises, grants, qualifications, authorizations, licenses,
permits, easements, consents, certificates, approvals and orders
(Approvals) from all Governmental Entities
necessary to own, lease and operate the properties it purports
to own, operate or lease and to lawfully carry on its business
as now conducted, except where the failure to have such
Approvals has not had and would not reasonably be expected to
have, individually or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse
Effect with respect to Italy.
(b) Italy has no material Subsidiaries except as Disclosed
to Portugal prior to the date hereof.
(c) Except as Disclosed Publicly by Italy or as Disclosed
to Portugal, all of the outstanding capital stock of, or other
equity securities or ownership interests in, each Subsidiary of
Italy, is owned by Italy, directly or indirectly, free and clear
of any Lien and free of any other limitation or restriction
(including any restriction on the right to vote, sell or
otherwise dispose of such capital stock or other equity
securities or ownership interests). Except as Disclosed Publicly
by Italy or as Disclosed to Portugal, there are no outstanding
(i) securities of Italy or its Subsidiaries convertible
into or exchangeable for capital or equity securities or
ownership interests in any Subsidiary of Italy or (ii)
except for employee or director stock options issued pursuant to
Italys stock option plans, options or other rights to
acquire from Italy or any of its Subsidiaries, or other
obligation of Italy or any of its Subsidiaries to issue, any
capital stock or other equity securities or ownership interests
in, or any securities convertible into or exchangeable for any
capital stock or other equity securities or ownership interests
in, any Subsidiary of Italy. Except as Disclosed Publicly by
Italy or as Disclosed to Portugal, there are no outstanding
obligations of Italy or any of its Subsidiaries to repurchase,
redeem or otherwise acquire any of the items referred to in
clauses (i) and (ii) above.
(d) Except as Disclosed Publicly by Italy or as Disclosed
to Portugal, neither Italy nor any of its Subsidiaries has
agreed nor is it obligated to make nor is it bound by any
Contract under which it may become obligated to acquire any
material equity interest or investment in, or make any material
capital contribution to, any Person (other than a wholly-owned
Subsidiary of Italy). Except as Disclosed Publicly by Italy or
as Disclosed to Portugal, neither Italy nor any of its
Subsidiaries directly or indirectly owns any material interest
or investment (whether equity or debt) nor has any rights to
acquire any material interest or investment in any Person (other
than a Subsidiary of Italy).
A-11
(e) Italy and each of its Subsidiaries that is a
corporation or other legal entity is duly qualified to do
business as a foreign corporation or other foreign legal entity,
and is in good standing, under the Laws of all jurisdictions
where the nature of its business requires such qualification,
except for those jurisdictions where the failure to be so
qualified, individually or in the aggregate, has not had and
would not be reasonably expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect with respect to Italy.
3.2. Articles of
Incorporation and Bylaws. Italy has Disclosed to
Portugal complete and correct copies of its Articles of
Incorporation and Bylaws or other similar organizational
documents (together, the Italy Charter
Documents), as amended to date. Such Italy Charter
Documents, as so amended, and the equivalent organizational
documents of each of its Subsidiaries, are in full force and
effect. Italy is not in violation of any of the provisions of
the Italy Charter Documents, and no material Subsidiary of Italy
is in violation of any of its organizational documents.
3.3. Capitalization.
(a) The authorized capital of Italy consists of (i)
an unlimited number of common shares, without par value (the
Italy Common Shares), and (ii)
45,000,000 preferred shares issuable in series (the
Italy Preferred Shares). As of June 16,
2006, 198,755,104 Italy Common Shares, including 155,931
restricted Italy Common Shares in respect of which the
restriction period has not expired (the Italy
Restricted Shares) awarded pursuant to Italys
2001 Key Executive Incentive Plan and 2005 Key Executive
Incentive Plan (the KEIP Plans), are
outstanding and no Italy Preferred Shares are outstanding. As of
June 16, 2006, options to acquire an aggregate of 1,780,539
Italy Common Shares (the Italy Options) and
715,300 Italy SARs are outstanding under the Italy Option Plans.
In addition, Italy has issued and there are outstanding as of
June 16, 2006: (i) liquid yield option notes
representing an aggregate amount payable at maturity of
U.S. $178,908,000, which are due and payable on
March 29, 2021 (the LYON Notes), which
are convertible into an aggregate of 4,750,544 Italy Common
Shares; (ii) subordinated convertible debentures due on
March 14, 2052, which are convertible into an aggregate of
8,670,469 Italy Common Shares with U.S. $225,545,000 amount
payable at maturity; and (iii) U.S. $176,579,000
aggregate principal amount of convertible debentures due on
March 14, 2023, which are convertible into an aggregate of
5,639,121 Italy Common Shares. Italy has also issued warrants
for the purchase of Italy Common Shares at an exercise price of
Cdn. $30, expiring on August 21, 2006, of which
10,770,964 warrants remain outstanding as of June 16, 2006.
As of the date hereof, no shares of capital stock of Italy are
held by any Subsidiary of Italy or in treasury by Italy. All
issued and outstanding shares of capital stock of Italy have
been duly authorized and validly issued and are fully paid and
nonassessable.
(b) Except as Publicly Disclosed by Italy or as Disclosed
to Portugal or as set forth in Section 3.3(a), there are no
subscriptions, options, warrants, phantom shares, stock units,
stock appreciation rights, other equity-based awards, equity
securities, partnership interests, conversion privileges or
similar ownership interests, calls, rights (including preemptive
rights) or Contracts of any character to which Italy or any of
its Subsidiaries is a party or by which it is bound obligating
Italy or any of its Subsidiaries to issue, deliver or sell, or
cause to be issued, delivered or sold, or to repurchase, redeem
or otherwise acquire, or cause the repurchase, redemption or
acquisition of, any equity securities, partnership interests or
similar ownership interests of Italy or any of its Subsidiaries,
or obligating Italy or any of its Subsidiaries to grant, extend,
accelerate the vesting of or enter into any such subscription,
option, warrant, phantom share, stock unit, stock appreciation
right, other equity-based award, equity security, call, right,
commitment or agreement. Except as Disclosed to Portugal or as
set forth in Section 3.3(a), there are no outstanding
bonds, debentures, or other evidences of indebtedness of Italy
or any Subsidiary thereof having the right to vote (or that are
convertible for or exercisable into securities having the right
to vote) with the holders of Italy Common Shares on any matter.
Except as Disclosed to Portugal or as contemplated by this
Agreement, there is no voting trust, proxy, registration rights
agreement, rights plan, anti-takeover plan or other Contract or
understanding to which Italy or any of its Subsidiaries is a
party or by which it is bound with respect to any equity
security of any class of Italy or with respect to any equity
security, partnership interest or similar ownership interest of
any class of any of its Subsidiaries.
A-12
3.4. Authority Relative to
this Agreement.
(a) Italy has all necessary corporate power and authority
to execute and deliver this Agreement and to perform its
obligations hereunder and, subject to the receipt of the Italy
Shareholder Approval, the Interim Order and the Final Order, to
consummate the transactions contemplated hereby and thereby. The
execution, delivery and performance by Italy of this Agreement
and the consummation by Italy of the transactions contemplated
hereby have been duly and validly authorized by all necessary
corporate action on the part of Italy, and no other corporate
proceedings on the part of Italy are necessary to authorize this
Agreement, or to consummate the transactions so contemplated,
other than the Italy Shareholder Approval, the Interim Order and
the Final Order. This Agreement has been duly and validly
executed and delivered by Italy and, assuming the due
authorization, execution and delivery by Portugal, constitutes a
valid, legal and binding obligation of Italy, enforceable
against Italy in accordance with its terms, except that
(i) such enforcement may be subject to applicable
bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium or other
similar Laws, now or hereafter in effect, affecting
creditors rights generally, (ii) the remedy of
specific performance and injunctive and other forms of equitable
relief may be subject to equitable defenses and to the
discretion of the court before which any proceeding may be
brought and (iii) the Currency Act (Canada) precludes a
court in Canada from rendering judgment in any currency other
than Canadian currency.
(b) At a meeting duly called and held, Italys board
of directors has unanimously: (i) determined that this
Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby (including
the Arrangement) are fair to the holders of the Italy Common
Shares and in the best interests of Italy; (ii)
authorized and approved this Agreement and the transactions
contemplated hereby (including the Arrangement); and
(iii) resolved to recommend approval and adoption of the
Arrangement by its shareholders at the Italy Meeting.
3.5. No Conflict; Required
Filings and Consents.
(a) The execution, delivery and performance by Italy of
this Agreement and the consummation by Italy of the transactions
contemplated hereby do not and will not, subject to obtaining
the Italy Shareholder Approval and receipt of the Approvals
referred to in Section 3.5(b) below, (i) contravene,
conflict with or result in a violation or breach of any
provision of the Italy Charter Documents or the equivalent
organizational documents of any of Italys material
Subsidiaries, (ii) contravene, conflict with or result in
a violation or breach of any provisions of any Law applicable to
Italy or any of its Subsidiaries or by which its or any of their
respective properties is bound or affected, (iii) require
any consent or other action by any Person under, constitute a
default (or an event that, with or without notice or lapse of
time or both, would constitute a default) under, or cause or
permit the termination, amendment, acceleration, triggering or
cancellation or other change of any right or obligation or the
loss of any benefit to which Italy or any of its Subsidiaries is
entitled under (A) any provision of any Contract or other
instrument binding upon Italy or any of its Subsidiaries or
(B) any license, permit, franchise, certificate, approval
or other similar authorization (a Permit)
held by, or affecting, or relating in any way to, the assets or
business of, Italy or any of its Subsidiaries, or (iv)
result in the creation or imposition of any Lien on any asset of
Italy or any of its Subsidiaries, other than such exceptions in
the case of clause (ii), (iii) or (iv) as would
not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to
have a Material Adverse Effect with respect to Italy.
(b) The execution, delivery and performance by Italy of
this Agreement and the consummation by Italy of the transactions
contemplated hereby do not, and shall not, require any Approval,
action by or in respect of, filing with or notification to, any
Governmental Entity, to be made or obtained by Italy or its
Subsidiaries, except for (A) the Competition Act
Approval, (B) the compliance with any applicable
requirements of the United States Hart-Scott-Rodino
Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, and the
rules and regulations thereunder (the HSR
Act), including pre-merger notification requirements,
(C) compliance with any applicable requirements of
Council Regulation (EC) 139/2004 of 20 January 2004 on the
control of concentrations between undertakings; (D) any
other applicable competition, merger control, antitrust or
similar Law of foreign Governmental Entities, (E) the
filing with the Canadian Securities Regulatory Authorities and
the mailing to the shareholders of Italy of the Italy
A-13
Circular, (F) such other filings, authorizations,
decisions or orders as may be required by the rules and
regulations of the TSX or NYSE, (G) the Interim Order,
the Final Order and any approvals required by the Interim Order,
the Final Order or filings with the Director under the CBCA and
(H) any other Approvals or Permits, which, if not
obtained, would not, individually or in the aggregate,
reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect with
respect to Italy.
3.6. Compliance;
Permits.
(a) Each of Italy and its Subsidiaries is, and at all times
since January 1, 2004 has been, in compliance with all Laws
and Orders applicable to it or by which its properties are bound
or affected, other than non-compliance matters that have not had
and would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be
expected to have a Material Adverse Effect with respect to Italy.
(b) Neither Italy nor any of its Subsidiaries is in default
or violation of (i) any Law or Order applicable to Italy
or any of its Subsidiaries or by which its or any of their
respective properties is bound or affected, or (ii) any
material Contract, Permit or other instrument or obligation to
which Italy or any of its Subsidiaries is a party or by which
Italy or any of its Subsidiaries or its or any of their
respective properties is bound or affected; except, in each
case, for any conflicts, defaults or violations that have not
had and would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably
be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect with respect to
Italy. To the knowledge of Italy, no investigation or review by
any Governmental Entity is pending or threatened against Italy
or its Subsidiaries, other than, in each such case, those the
outcome of which have not had and would not, individually or in
the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse
Effect with respect to Italy.
(c) Since January 1, 2004 Italy has complied in all
material respects with the applicable listing and corporate
governance rules and regulations of the TSX and NYSE.
(d) Each of Italy and its Subsidiaries owns, possesses or
has obtained, and is in compliance with, all Permits of or from
any Governmental Entity necessary to conduct its business as now
conducted, except for such failures which have not had and would
not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to
have a Material Adverse Effect with respect to Italy.
3.7. Reports; Financial
Statements.
(a) Since January 1, 2004, Italy has filed with the
Canadian Securities Regulatory Authorities, the SEC, the TSX and
the NYSE the forms, reports and documents, including financial
statements, annual information forms, material change reports
and management proxy circulars required to be filed by Italy
under applicable Securities Laws, including but not limited to
all documents relating to the transactions contemplated by the
Support Agreement (collectively, the Italy
Documents). The Italy Documents, at the time filed (or
if amended or superseded by a filing prior to the date of this
Agreement, then on the date of such filing), complied in all
material respects with the requirements of applicable Securities
Laws and did not contain any misrepresentation (as defined in
the Securities Act (Ontario)) or any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be
stated therein or necessary in order to make the statements
therein, in light of the circumstances under which they were
made, not misleading. Italy has not filed any confidential
material change report with the Canadian Securities Regulatory
Authorities or any other securities authority or regulator or
any stock exchange or other self-regulatory authority which as
of the date hereof remains confidential. None of Italys
Subsidiaries is required to file any reports or other documents
with any of the Canadian Securities Regulatory Authorities, the
SEC, the TSX or the NYSE.
(b) The annual audited consolidated financial statements
and the quarterly unaudited consolidated financial statements
(including in each case, any related notes thereto) contained in
the Italy Documents (the Italy Financial
Statements) complied as to form in all material
respects with the published rules and regulations of applicable
Governmental Entities, the Canadian Securities Regulatory
Authorities, the SEC, the TSX and the NYSE with respect thereto
as of their respective dates, and have been prepared in
accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting
principles (Canadian GAAP) applied on a basis
consistent throughout the periods indicated and consistent with
each other (except as may be
A-14
indicated in the notes thereto). The Italy Financial Statements
present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial position, results of operations and cash flows of
Italy and its Subsidiaries as of the dates and for the periods
indicated therein (subject, in the case of unaudited statements,
to normal, recurring year-end adjustments that are not expected
to be material in amount and the absence of notes thereto) on a
consolidated basis.
(c) Since the enactment of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(the Sarbanes-Oxley Act), Italy has been and
is in compliance in all material respects with the applicable
provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (including, without
limitation, Section 402 thereof) and the rules and
regulations promulgated thereunder.
(d) The books and records of Italy and its Subsidiaries, in
all material respects, (i) have been maintained in
accordance with good business practices on a basis consistent
with prior years, (ii) state in reasonable detail the
material transactions and dispositions of the assets of Italy
and its Subsidiaries and (iii) accurately and fairly
reflect the basis for the Italy Financial Statements. Italy has
(i) designed and maintains disclosure controls and
procedures to ensure that material information relating to Italy
and its Subsidiaries is made known to management of Italy by
others within those entities to allow timely decisions regarding
required disclosure, and (ii) designed and maintains a
system of internal controls over financial reporting sufficient
to provide reasonable assurances regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements,
including that (A) transactions are executed in
accordance with managements general or specific
authorization; (B) transactions are recorded as necessary
(x) to permit preparation of consolidated financial
statements in conformity with Canadian GAAP and (y) to
maintain accountability of the assets of Italy and its
Subsidiaries; (C) access to assets is permitted only in
accordance with managements general or specific
authorization; and (D) the recorded accountability of
assets is compared with the existing assets at reasonable
intervals and appropriate action is taken with respect to any
differences. The management of Italy has disclosed, based on its
most recent evaluation, to Italys auditors and the audit
committee of Italys board of directors (i) all
significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect Italys ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
identified for Italys auditors any material weaknesses in
internal controls and (ii) any fraud, whether or not
material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in Italys internal controls.
(e) To the knowledge of Italy, as of the date hereof, Italy
has not identified any material weaknesses in the design or
operation of its internal controls over financial reporting. To
the knowledge of Italy, there is no reason to believe that its
auditors and its chief executive officer and chief financial
officer will not be able to give the certifications and
attestations required pursuant to the rules and regulations
adopted pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act,
when first due.
(f) PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP are and were at all times
during the audit engagement period with Italy
(i) independent registered public accountants with respect
to Italy and its Subsidiaries in accordance with the applicable
rules and regulations thereunder adopted by the SEC and the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and (ii) a
participating audit firm within the meaning of
National Instrument 52-108 Auditor Oversight of the
Canadian Securities Administrators and in compliance with any
restrictions or sanctions imposed by the Canadian Public
Accountability Board.
(g) No attorney representing Italy or any of its
Subsidiaries, whether or not employed by Italy or any of its
Subsidiaries, has reported evidence of a violation of any
Securities Laws, breach of fiduciary duty or similar violation
by Italy or any of its Subsidiaries or their respective
officers, directors, employees or agents to Italys chief
legal officer, audit committee (or other committee designated
for the purpose) of the board of directors or the board of
directors.
(h) None of the information to be supplied by Italy or its
Affiliates in writing specifically for use in the Portugal Proxy
Statement will, at the time of the mailing of the Portugal Proxy
Statement and any amendments or supplements thereto, and at the
time of the Portugal Meeting, contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state any material fact required to be
stated therein or necessary in order to make the statements
therein, in the light of the circumstances under which they are
made, not misleading.
A-15
(i) None of the information to be included in or
incorporated by reference into the Italy Circular (other than
information supplied in writing by Portugal specifically for use
therein) will, at the time of the mailing of the Italy Circular
and any amendments or supplements thereto, and at the time of
the Italy Meeting, contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state any material fact required to be stated
therein or necessary in order to make the statements therein, in
the light of the circumstances under which they are made, not
misleading.
3.8. No Undisclosed
Liabilities. Except as Disclosed to Portugal, neither
Italy nor any of its Subsidiaries has any liabilities (absolute,
accrued, contingent, determined, determinable or otherwise) or
obligations, in each case, of the type that would be required to
be disclosed on a consolidated balance sheet of Italy (or the
notes thereto) and there is no existing condition, situation or
set of circumstances that could be reasonably expected to result
in such a liability or obligation, except
(i) liabilities or obligations fully reflected or
reserved against in Italys balance sheet as of
December 31, 2005 (or the notes thereto), included in the
Italy Financial Statements, (ii) liabilities or
obligations disclosed in any Italy Document filed after
December 31, 2005 and prior to the date of this Agreement,
(iii) liabilities incurred since December 31,
2005 in the ordinary course of business consistent with past
practice, (iv) obligations arising pursuant to the
terms of the Contracts disclosed in Section 3.20 (or not
required to be so disclosed) or (v) liabilities or
obligations that have not had and would not, individually or in
the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse
Effect with respect to Italy.
3.9. Absence of Certain
Changes or Events. Since December 31, 2005, the
business of Italy and its Subsidiaries has been conducted in the
ordinary course consistent with past practices and except as
Disclosed Publicly by Italy there has not been
(i) any event, occurrence or development of a state
of circumstances or facts which has had or would, individually
or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have any Material
Adverse Effect with respect to Italy, (ii) any
material revaluation by Italy of any of its assets, including,
without limitation, writing down the value of capitalized
inventory or writing off notes or accounts receivable or any
material sale of assets of Italy other than in the ordinary
course of business, (iii) any material damage,
destruction or loss (whether or not covered by insurance) with
respect to any material assets of Italy or its Subsidiaries,
(iv) any Material Italy Contract cancelled,
terminated, or materially adversely modified that would
reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect with
respect to Italy or (v) any event or action that if taken
after the date hereof would be prohibited by Section 5.1
hereof.
3.10. Absence of
Litigation. Except as Disclosed Publicly by Italy or as
Disclosed to Portugal, (a) there is no Action that
has been commenced or, to the knowledge of Italy, threatened
against or affecting Italy or any Subsidiary thereof or any of
their respective properties, rights or assets before any
Governmental Entity which, if determined adversely with respect
to Italy, would, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be
expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on Italy; and
(b) neither Italy nor any Subsidiary thereof, nor
any of their respective properties, rights or assets, is subject
to any outstanding Order that has had or would, individually or
in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material
Adverse Effect with respect to Italy.
3.11. Employee Plans.
(a) Italy and each Subsidiary thereof has complied, in all
material respects, with all the terms of, and all applicable
Laws in respect of, each Italy Employee Plan, and has made all
funding contributions required under applicable Law to be made
to such Italy Employee Plans. All Italy Employee Plans are in
good standing in all material respects under applicable Law.
Italy has Disclosed to Portugal copies of all material Italy
Employee Plans (and in the case of any material Italy Employee
Plan that is not written, a written description of such plan or
board of directors or compensation committee resolution
providing for such plan).
(b) Each Italy Employee Plan intended to be tax qualified
under the Code has been the subject of determination letters
from the U.S. Internal Revenue Service to the effect that
such plans are qualified and exempt from Federal income taxes
under Sections 401(a) and 501(a), respectively, of the
Code. Each Italy Employee Plan intended to be tax qualified
under the ITA has been established, registered and
A-16
operated in accordance with the applicable requirements of the
ITA and other applicable Law. No step has been taken, no event
has occurred and no condition or circumstance exists that has
resulted or could reasonably be expected to result in any Italy
Employee Plan being ordered or required to be terminated or
wound up in whole or in part or having its tax qualification or
registration under applicable Law refused or revoked, or being
placed under the administration of any trustee or receiver or
regulatory authority or being required to pay any material
Taxes, fees, penalties or levies under applicable Laws. There
are no actions, suits, claims (other than routine claims for
payment of benefits in the ordinary course), trials, demands,
investigations, arbitrations, or other proceedings which are
pending or threatened in respect of any of the Italy Employee
Plans or their assets which individually or in the aggregate
would have a Material Adverse Effect with respect to Italy.
(c) No event has occurred or condition exists with respect
to any of the Italy Employee Plans or relating to any current or
former employee of Italy or any Subsidiary thereof (or any of
their beneficiaries or dependants) which, individually or in the
aggregate, is reasonably likely to result in a Material Adverse
Effect with respect to Italy.
(d) Except as Disclosed Publicly by Italy or as Disclosed
to Portugal, the consummation of the transactions contemplated
by this Agreement will not by itself entitle any employee or any
independent contractor of Italy or any Subsidiary thereof to
severance or similar pay or accelerate the time of payment or
vesting or trigger any payment of funding (through a grantor
trust or otherwise) or compensation or benefits under, increase
the amount payable or trigger any other material obligation
pursuant to, any Italy Employee Plan.
(e) The consummation of the transactions contemplated by
this Agreement will not (either alone or upon the occurrence of
additional acts or events) result in any payment under any Italy
Employee Plan that would constitute an excess parachute
payment for purposes of Section 280G or 4999 of the
Code.
3.12. Labor Matters.
(a) Italy has Disclosed to Portugal copies of all
collective agreements (Collective Agreements)
to which Italy or any Subsidiary thereof is a party. To the
knowledge of Italy, there are no threatened or apparent union
organizing activities involving employees of Italy or any
Subsidiary thereof that are not already covered by a Collective
Agreement that would have a Material Adverse Effect with respect
to Italy. Neither Italy nor any Subsidiary thereof is in
material violation of any provision under any Collective
Agreement. There is no strike or lock out occurring or, to the
knowledge of Italy, threatened affecting Italy or any Subsidiary
thereof that would have a Material Adverse Effect with respect
to Italy.
(b) Neither Italy nor any Subsidiary thereof is subject to
any claim for wrongful dismissal, constructive dismissal or any
other tort claim, actual or threatened, or any litigation,
actual or threatened, relating to its employees or independent
contractors (including any termination of such persons) other
than those claims or such litigation as would not individually
or in the aggregate have a Material Adverse Effect with respect
to Italy. Italy and each Subsidiary thereof has operated in
material compliance with all applicable Laws with respect to
employment and labor, including, but not limited to, employment
and labor standards, occupational health and/or safety,
employment equity, pay equity, workers compensation, human
rights and labor relations and there are no current, pending or
threatened proceedings before any board or tribunal with respect
to any of the areas listed herein other than where the failure
to so operate, or for such proceedings which individually or in
the aggregate, would not have a Material Adverse Effect with
respect to Italy. Italy and each Subsidiary thereof has operated
in material compliance with the National Labor Relations Act
(U.S.) as amended, and the rules and regulations promulgated
thereunder, the Labour Relations Act, 1995 (Ontario), and the
rules and regulations promulgated thereunder and any and all
similar Laws.
(c) Each of Italy and its Subsidiaries is in compliance
with all applicable Laws covering occupational health and/or
safety, including the Occupational Health and Safety Act
(Ontario), as amended, and the regulations promulgated
thereunder, and the Workplace Safety and Insurance Act, 1977
(Ontario) as
A-17
amended and any regulations promulgated thereunder, except for
any non-compliance that would not reasonably be expected to have
a Material Adverse Effect with respect to Italy.
3.13. Property and
Title. Applying customary standards in the Canadian
mining industry, each of Italy, its Subsidiaries and its
material joint ventures has, to the extent necessary to permit
the operation of their respective businesses as presently
conducted: (a) sufficient title, clear of any title defect
or Lien (other than as Disclosed to Portugal or Disclosed
Publicly by Italy) to its operating properties and properties
with estimated proven and probable mineral reserves and/or
estimated mineral resources (other than property to which it is
lessee, in which case it has a valid leasehold interest) and
(b) good and sufficient title to the real property
interests including, without limitation, fee simple estate of
and in real property, leases, easements, rights of way, permits,
mining claims, concessions or licenses from landowners or
authorities permitting the use of land by Italy, its
Subsidiaries and its material joint ventures (other than as
Disclosed Publicly by Italy). Italy, its Subsidiaries and its
material joint ventures hold all mineral rights required to
continue their respective businesses and operations as currently
conducted and as proposed to be conducted as Disclosed Publicly
by Italy, except to the extent that a failure to do so would not
constitute a Material Adverse Effect with respect to Italy.
Except for such failures of title or liens and royalty burdens
that would, individually or in the aggregate, not have a
Material Adverse Effect with respect to Italy, (x) all
mineral rights held by Italy, its Subsidiaries and its material
joint ventures are free and clear of all Liens and royalty
burdens (other than as Disclosed Publicly by Italy), and
(y) none of such mineral rights are subject to reduction by
reference to mine payout or otherwise except for those created
in the ordinary course of business and which would not have a
Material Adverse Effect with respect to Italy.
3.14. Mineral Reserves and
Resources. The estimated proven and probable mineral
reserves and estimated, indicated, measured and inferred mineral
resources disclosed in the Italy Documents as of
December 31, 2005 have been prepared and disclosed in all
material respects in accordance with all applicable Laws. There
has been no material reduction (other than as a result of
operations in the ordinary course of business) in the aggregate
amount of estimated mineral reserves and estimated mineral
resources of Italy, its Subsidiaries and its material joint
ventures, taken as a whole, from the amounts Disclosed Publicly
by Italy.
3.15. Operational
Matters. Except as would not, individually or in the
aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse
Effect with respect to Italy:
|
|
|
(a) all rentals, royalties, overriding royalty interests,
production payments, net profits, interest burdens and other
payments due or payable on or prior to the date hereof under or
with respect to the direct or indirect assets of Italy, its
Subsidiaries and its material joint ventures have been properly
and timely paid; |
|
|
(b) all rentals, payments, and obligations due and payable
or performable on or prior to the date hereof under or on
account of any of the direct or indirect assets of Italy, its
Subsidiaries and its material joint ventures have been duly
paid, performed, or provided for prior to the date hereof; |
|
|
(c) all (i) mines where Italy or a Subsidiary of
Italy is operator at the relevant time have been developed and
operated in accordance with good mining practices and in
compliance with all then-applicable Laws, and (ii) mines
located in or on the lands of Italy, any Subsidiary or material
joint venture of Italy, or lands pooled or unitized therewith,
which have been abandoned by Italy or any Subsidiary or material
joint venture of Italy, have been developed, managed, and
abandoned in accordance with good mining practices and in
compliance with all applicable Laws, and (iii) all future
abandonment, remediation and reclamation obligations have been
accurately Disclosed Publicly by Italy without omission of
information necessary to make the disclosure not misleading, and
(iv) all costs, expenses, and liabilities payable on or
prior to the date hereof under the terms of any Material Italy
Contract have been properly and timely paid, except for such
expenses that are being currently paid prior to delinquency in
the ordinary course of business. |
3.16. Insurance.
Italy maintains insurance policies covering the assets,
business, equipment, properties, operations, employees, officers
and directors of Italy and its Subsidiaries (collectively, the
Italy
A-18
Insurance Policies) which are of the type and in
amounts which it believes are reasonably appropriate to conduct
its business. To Italys knowledge, there is no material
claim by Italy or any of its Subsidiaries pending under any of
the material Italy Insurance Policies as to which coverage has
been questioned, denied or disputed by the underwriters of such
policies or bonds that would have a Material Adverse Effect with
respect to Italy.
3.17. Taxes.
(a) Definition of Taxes. For the purposes of
this Agreement, Tax and
Taxes means any and all taxes, charges, fees,
levies or other assessments imposed by Laws, including all
income taxes (including any tax on or based upon net income,
gross income, income as specially defined, earnings, profits or
selected items of income) and all capital taxes, mining taxes,
gross receipts taxes, environmental taxes, profits taxes,
disability taxes, registration taxes, sales taxes, use taxes, ad
valorem taxes, value added taxes, transfer taxes, franchise
taxes, license taxes, development taxes, education taxes,
business taxes, social services taxes, surtaxes, land transfer
taxes, harmonized sales taxes, withholding taxes or other
withholding obligations, net worth taxes, recording taxes,
capital stock taxes, payroll taxes, employment taxes, excise
taxes, stamp taxes, occupation taxes, premium taxes, property
taxes, windfall profits taxes, alternative or add-on minimum
taxes, goods and services taxes, service use taxes, customs
duties or other governmental charges, estimated or other taxes,
assessments, charges, duties or imposts of any kind whatsoever,
including Canada Pension Plan and provincial pension plan
contributions, unemployment insurance payments and workers
compensation premiums, together with any installments with
respect thereto, and any interest, penalties, additional taxes,
additions to tax or other amounts imposed by any taxing
authority with respect to the foregoing and any liability for
any such Taxes imposed by Law with respect to any other person,
including under any tax sharing, indemnification or other
agreements or arrangements or any liability for taxes of a
predecessor or transferor entity.
(b) Taxes. Except as Disclosed Publicly by
Italy or as Disclosed to Portugal or as would not, individually
or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material
Adverse Effect with respect to Italy:
|
|
|
(i) All Tax returns, statements, reports, forms,
declarations, remittances, and similar statements (including
estimated Tax returns, claims for refunds, amended returns and
reports and information returns and reports) required to be
filed with any taxing authority by or on behalf of Italy or any
of its Subsidiaries (collectively, the Italy
Returns) were filed when due with all appropriate
taxing authorities (including any applicable extension periods)
in accordance with all applicable Laws and were correct and
complete in all material respects. |
|
|
(ii) Italy and each of its Subsidiaries have timely paid,
or withheld and remitted to the appropriate taxing authority,
all Taxes due and payable by any of them under any applicable
Law, including all Taxes required to be withheld, collected and
paid in connection with (i) amounts paid or owing to any
present or former employee, independent contractor, creditor or
shareholder or to any other Person, (ii) goods and services
received from or provided to any Person and (iii) amounts
paid or credited to any Person not resident in the jurisdiction
of the relevant payor. |
|
|
(iii) The charges, accruals and reserves for Taxes with
respect to Italy and its Subsidiaries reflected on the Italy
Financial Statements (whether or not due and whether or not
shown on any Italy Return but excluding any provision for
deferred income Taxes) are adequate under Canadian GAAP to cover
Taxes accruing through the date thereof. |
|
|
(iv) The tax basis of the assets of Italy and its
Subsidiaries by category including the classification of such
assets as being depreciable, amortizable or resource properties
giving rise to resource pools (collectively, the Tax
Pools) as reflected in the Italy Returns is true and
correct in all material respects. |
|
|
(v) There is no Action or audit now pending or threatened
in writing in respect of any Tax or tax asset of
Italy or any of its Subsidiaries. For purposes of this
Section 3.17 and Section 4.17 below, the term
tax asset shall include but is not limited to any
net operating loss, non-capital |
A-19
|
|
|
losses, net capital losses, Tax Pools, investment tax credit,
foreign tax credit, charitable deduction or any other credit or
Tax attribute which could reduce Taxes. There are no
reassessments of Italys or any of its Subsidiaries
Taxes that have been issued and which remain outstanding. |
|
|
(vi) Neither Italy nor any of its Subsidiaries is party to
any tax sharing agreement, tax indemnification agreement or
other agreement or arrangement relating to Taxes with any Person
(other than Italy or any of its Subsidiaries). Neither Italy nor
any of its Subsidiaries has been a member of an affiliated,
combined or unitary group filing a combined, unitary, or other
return for Canadian provincial, local or non-Canadian tax
purposes reflecting the income, assets, or activities of
affiliated companies, or has any liability for the Taxes of any
other Person (other than Italy or any of its Subsidiaries) under
any provision of Canadian federal, provincial, local, or
non-Canadian Law, or as a transferee or successor, or by
contract, or otherwise. |
3.18. Environmental
Matters. Except as Disclosed Publicly by Italy or except
for items with respect to which adequate provision in accordance
with Canadian GAAP has been made in the Italy Financial
Statements or except as has not had and would not reasonably be
expected to result, individually or in the aggregate, in a
Material Adverse Effect with respect to Italy:
|
|
|
(a) (i) No Hazardous Substance has been discharged,
disposed of, dumped, pumped, deposited, spilled, leaked, emitted
or released by Italy or any of its Subsidiaries (or, to the
knowledge of Italy, is otherwise present) at, on, under or from
any property now or previously owned, leased or operated by
Italy or any of its Subsidiaries (Italy
Property) in such manner or quantity that exceeds
remediation criteria or standards under any applicable
Environmental Laws or as would require investigation or
remediation (either by Italy or its Subsidiaries, or for which
Italy or its Subsidiaries would otherwise be liable) under any
applicable Environmental Laws or as would adversely affect the
business or operations of Italy or any of its Subsidiaries and
(ii) to the knowledge of Italy, there are no liabilities
of Italy or any of its Subsidiaries arising out of any
Environmental Laws or any agreement with a third party and
relating to any Hazardous Substances at, on, under or about any
property other than a Italy Property. |
|
|
(b) The operations of Italy and each of its Subsidiaries
are and have been in compliance with all, and have not violated
any, applicable Environmental Laws. |
|
|
(c) (i) Italy and its Subsidiaries hold all
approvals, certificates, authorizations, agreements, permits,
licenses, certificates, clearances and consents under or
pursuant to applicable Environmental Laws (the Italy
Environmental Permits) necessary for the conduct of
Italys and its Subsidiaries businesses as conducted
currently and through the most recent fiscal year, (ii)
all such Italy Environmental Permits are valid and in full force
and effect, (iii) Italy and its Subsidiaries have not
violated any such Italy Environmental Permits, and (iv)
neither Italy nor any of its Subsidiaries has received any
notice that any Italy Environmental Permits will be revoked,
adversely modified or not renewed, and to the knowledge of Italy
there is no reasonable basis for revoking, adversely modifying
or refusing to renew any such Italy Environmental Permits. |
|
|
(d) No Order or Action is pending, and to Italys
knowledge, no Order or Action has been threatened, by any
Governmental Entity or third party against or, to Italys
knowledge, affecting Italy or any of its Subsidiaries concerning
any alleged violation of or liability under any Environmental
Law or concerning any Hazardous Substance. |
|
|
(e) No Environmental Lien is pending, and to Italys
knowledge, no Environmental Lien has been threatened against or
affecting Italy, any of its Subsidiaries, or any real or
personal property of Italy or any of its Subsidiaries. |
3.19. Intellectual
Property. Except as would not, individually or in the
aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse
Effect with respect to Italy, (i) Italy or one or more of
its Subsidiaries is the owner or has the right to use all
Intellectual Property and Proprietary Subject Matter used in the
conduct of its business as it is currently conducted (such
Intellectual Property which is owned or used by Italy or one of
its Subsidiaries, the Italy Intellectual
Property and such Proprietary Subject
A-20
Matter, the Italy-Used Proprietary Subject
Matter), free and clear of all Liens; (ii)
there are no Orders or Actions pending, or to Italys
knowledge, threatened, respecting the ownership, validity,
enforceability or use of any Italy Intellectual Property or
Italy-Used Proprietary Subject Matter, and to the knowledge of
Italy, no facts or circumstances exist as a valid basis for
same; (iii) the Italy Intellectual Property has not been,
and Italy has no reason to expect it to become, abandoned,
cancelled or invalidated; (iv) Italy and its Subsidiaries
have taken all reasonable actions to protect the Italy
Intellectual Property, including Italy Intellectual Property
that is confidential in nature; and (v) to the knowledge
of Italy the conduct of the business of Italy and its
Subsidiaries as currently conducted does not infringe,
misappropriate, dilute or otherwise violate or make unauthorized
use of (Infringe) any Intellectual Property
of any Person, and no Person is currently Infringing Italy
Intellectual Property.
3.20. Agreements, Contracts
and Commitments.
(a) Except as Publicly Disclosed by Italy or as limited by
confidentiality obligations and applicable regulatory
requirements, Italy has Disclosed to Portugal (prior to the date
hereof with respect to contracts existing on the date hereof)
each material Contract to which Italy and each of its
Subsidiaries is a party (each, a Material Italy
Contract). Except for breaches, violations or defaults
which have not had and would not, individually or in the
aggregate, have a Material Adverse Effect with respect to Italy,
(i) each of the Material Italy Contracts is valid and in
full force and effect, unamended, and (ii) neither Italy
nor any of its Subsidiaries, nor to Italys knowledge any
other party to a Material Italy Contract, has violated any
material provision of, or committed or failed to perform any act
which, with or without notice, lapse of time, or both, would
constitute a material default under the provisions of any such
Material Italy Contract, and neither Italy nor any of its
Subsidiaries has received written notice that it has breached,
violated or defaulted under, any of the material terms or
conditions of any of the Material Italy Contracts. Neither Italy
nor any Subsidiary of Italy is a party to, or otherwise a
guarantor of or liable with respect to, any interest rate,
currency or other swap or derivative transaction, other than any
such transactions in the ordinary course of business.
(b) All Contracts to which Italy or any of its Subsidiaries
is a party relating to the transactions contemplated by the
Support Agreement (including but not limited to contracts with
France or any of its Subsidiaries) are set forth on
Schedule 3.20 (such contracts, together with the Support
Agreement, the Support Agreement Contracts).
All Support Agreement Contracts are valid and in full force and
effect and neither Italy nor any of its Subsidiaries has
violated any material provision of, or committed or failed to
perform any act which, with or without notice, lapse of time, or
both, would constitute a material default under the provisions
of any Support Agreement Contract.
3.21. Brokers. Italy
and its Subsidiaries have not incurred, nor will they incur,
directly or indirectly, any liability for brokerage or finders
fees or agents commissions or any similar charges in
connection with this Agreement or any transaction contemplated
hereby, other than fees and expenses payable to Morgan
Stanley & Co. Incorporated, Goldman Sachs Canada Credit
Partners Co. and RBC Dominion Securities Corporation.
3.22. Opinions of Financial
Advisors. On the date of this Agreement the board of
directors of Italy received from its financial advisors, Morgan
Stanley & Co. Incorporated, Goldman, Sachs &
Co. and RBC Dominion Securities Corporation, separate opinions,
each dated the date of this Agreement, to the effect that, as of
such date, the consideration to be received by the holders of
Italy Common Shares pursuant to the Combination Agreement is
fair, from a financial point of view, to the holders of the
Italy Common Shares.
3.23. Vote Required.
The only votes of the holders of any class or series of the
Italy Common Shares, Italy Options or other securities of Italy
necessary to approve this Agreement and the Arrangement and the
transactions contemplated hereby and thereby is, subject to any
requirement of the Interim Order and subject to obtaining any
required exemptions from applicable Canadian Securities
Regulatory Authorities, the Italy Shareholder Approval.
A-21
3.24. No Other
Representations and Warranties. Except for the
representations and warranties contained in this Agreement,
neither Italy nor its Subsidiaries nor any other Person or its
Subsidiaries makes any representation or warranty, express or
implied, on behalf of Italy and its Subsidiaries with respect to
the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
ARTICLE IV
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF PORTUGAL
Portugal represents and warrants to Italy, subject to such
exceptions as are specifically disclosed in writing in the
disclosure schedule (arranged in sections and subsections
corresponding to the numbered and lettered sections and
subsections contained in this Article IV with the
disclosures in any section or subsection of such schedule
qualifying the corresponding section or subsection in this
Article IV, as well as any other section or subsection of
this Article IV if the relevance of the disclosed item to
such other section or subsection is reasonably apparent on its
face) supplied by Portugal to Italy dated as of the date hereof
(the Portugal Disclosure Schedule) as follows:
4.1. Organization and
Qualification; Subsidiaries.
(a) Each of Portugal and its Subsidiaries that is a
corporation or other legal entity duly organized, validly
existing and in good standing under the Laws of the jurisdiction
of its incorporation and has the requisite corporate,
partnership or similar power and authority to own, lease and
operate its assets and properties and to carry on its business
as now conducted, except where the failure to do so has not had
and would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in
the aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect with respect to
Portugal. Each of Portugal and its Subsidiaries is in possession
of all Approvals from all Governmental Entities necessary to
own, lease and operate the properties it purports to own,
operate or lease and to lawfully carry on its business as now
conducted, except where the failure to have such Approvals has
not had and would not reasonably be expected to have,
individually or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect with
respect to Portugal.
(b) Portugal has no material Subsidiaries except those as
Disclosed to Italy prior to the date hereof.
(c) Except as Disclosed Publicly by Portugal or as
Disclosed to Italy, all of the outstanding capital stock of, or
other equity securities or ownership interests in, each
Subsidiary of Portugal, is owned by Portugal, directly or
indirectly, free and clear of any Lien and free of any other
limitation or restriction (including any restriction on the
right to vote, sell or otherwise dispose of such capital stock
or other equity securities or ownership interests). Except as
Disclosed Publicly by Portugal or as Disclosed to Italy, there
are no outstanding (i) securities of Portugal or its
Subsidiaries convertible into or exchangeable for capital stock
or other equity securities or ownership interests in any
Subsidiary of Portugal or (ii) except for employee or
director stock options issued pursuant to Portugals
employee stock option plans, options or other rights to acquire
from Portugal or any of its Subsidiaries, or other obligation of
Portugal or any of its Subsidiaries to issue, any capital stock
or other equity securities or ownership interests in, or any
securities convertible into or exchangeable for any capital
stock or other equity securities or ownership interests in, any
Subsidiary of Portugal. Except as Disclosed Publicly by Portugal
or as Disclosed to Italy, there are no outstanding obligations
of Portugal or any of its Subsidiaries to repurchase, redeem or
otherwise acquire any of the items referred to in
clauses (i) and (ii) above.
(d) Except as Disclosed Publicly by Portugal or as
Disclosed to Italy, neither Portugal nor any of its Subsidiaries
has agreed nor is it obligated to make nor is it bound by any
Contract under which it may become obligated to acquire any
material equity interest or investment in, or make any material
capital contribution to, any Person (other than a wholly-owned
Subsidiary of Portugal). Except as Disclosed Publicly by
Portugal or as Disclosed to Italy, neither Portugal nor any of
its Subsidiaries directly or indirectly owns any material
interest or investment (whether equity or debt) nor has any
rights to acquire any material interest or investment in any
Person (other than a Subsidiary of Portugal).
A-22
(e) Portugal and each of its Subsidiaries that is a
corporation or other legal entity is duly qualified to do
business as a foreign corporation or other foreign legal entity,
and is in good standing, under the Laws of all jurisdictions
where the nature of its business requires such qualification,
except for those jurisdictions where the failure to be so
qualified, individually or in the aggregate, has not had and
would not be reasonably expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect on Portugal.
4.2. Certificate of
Incorporation and Bylaws. Portugal has Disclosed to
Italy complete and correct copies of its Certificate of
Incorporation and Bylaws (together, the Portugal
Charter Documents), as amended to date. Such Portugal
Charter Documents, as so amended, and the equivalent
organizational documents of each of its Subsidiaries, are in
full force and effect. Portugal is not in violation of any of
the provisions of the Portugal Charter Documents, and no
material Subsidiary of Portugal is in violation of any of its
organizational documents.
4.3. Capitalization.
(a) The authorized capital stock of Portugal consists of
(i) 300,000,000 shares of common stock, par value
$6.25 per share (Portugal Common Shares)
(including 1,642,433 restricted shares in respect of which the
restriction period has not expired awarded pursuant to
Portugals equity-based incentive plans), and (ii)
6,000,000 shares of preferred stock (Portugal
Preferred Shares). As of June 20, 2006,
(1) 219,991,676 Portugal Common Shares and
(2) no Portugal Preferred Shares are outstanding. As of
the date hereof, options to acquire an aggregate of 582,473
Portugal Common Shares and 129,947 deferred share units payable
in cash or Portugal Common Shares are outstanding under
Portugals stock equity-based incentive plans. In addition,
as of the date hereof, no shares of capital stock of Portugal
are held by any Subsidiary of Portugal and
15,998,219 shares of capital stock of Portugal are held by
Portugal in treasury. All issued and outstanding shares of
capital stock of Portugal have been duly authorized and validly
issued and are fully paid and nonassessable.
(b) Except as Publicly Disclosed by Portugal or as
Disclosed to Italy or as set forth in Section 4.3(a), there
are no subscriptions, options, warrants, phantom shares, stock
units, stock appreciation rights, other equity-based awards,
equity securities, partnership interests, conversion privileges
or similar ownership interests, calls, rights (including
preemptive rights) or Contracts of any character to which
Portugal or any of its Subsidiaries is a party or by which it is
bound obligating Portugal or any of its Subsidiaries to issue,
deliver or sell, or cause to be issued, delivered or sold, or to
repurchase, redeem or otherwise acquire, or cause the
repurchase, redemption or acquisition of, any equity securities,
partnership interests or similar ownership interests of Portugal
or any of its Subsidiaries, or obligating Portugal or any of its
Subsidiaries to grant, extend, accelerate the vesting of or
enter into any such subscription, option, warrant, phantom
share, stock unit, stock appreciation right, other equity-based
awards, equity security, call, right, commitment or agreement.
Except as Disclosed to Italy or as set forth in
Section 4.3(a), there are no outstanding bonds, debentures,
or other evidences of indebtedness of Portugal or any Subsidiary
thereof having the right to vote (or that are convertible for or
exercisable into securities having the right to vote) with the
holders of Portugal Common Shares on any matter. Except as
Disclosed to Italy or as contemplated by this Agreement, there
is no voting trust, proxy, registration rights agreement, rights
plan, anti-takeover plan or other Contract or understanding to
which Portugal or any of its Subsidiaries is a party or by which
it is bound with respect to any equity security of any class of
Portugal or with respect to any equity security, partnership
interest or similar ownership interest of any class of any of
its Subsidiaries.
(c) The Portugal Common Shares to be issued at the
Effective Time as part of the Arrangement have, subject to the
receipt of the Portugal Stockholder Approval, been duly
authorized and, when issued and delivered in accordance with the
terms of this Agreement will have been validly issued and will
be fully paid and nonassessable and the issuance thereof will
not be subject to any preemptive or other similar right.
(d) The Portugal Common Shares are prescribed shares for
the purpose of paragraph 110(1)(d) of the ITA.
A-23
4.4. Authority Relative to
this Agreement.
(a) Portugal has all necessary corporate power and
authority to execute and deliver this Agreement and to perform
its obligations hereunder and, subject to the receipt of the
Portugal Stockholder Approval, to consummate the transactions
contemplated hereby. The execution, delivery and performance by
Portugal of this Agreement and the consummation by Portugal of
the transactions contemplated hereby have been duly and validly
authorized by all necessary corporate action on the part of
Portugal, and no other corporate proceedings on the part of
Portugal are necessary to authorize this Agreement or to
consummate the transactions so contemplated, other than the
Portugal Stockholder Approval, the Interim Order and the Final
Order. This Agreement has been duly and validly executed and
delivered by Portugal and, assuming the due authorization,
execution and delivery by Italy, constitutes a valid, legal and
binding obligation of Portugal, enforceable against Portugal in
accordance with its terms, except that (i) such
enforcement may be subject to applicable bankruptcy, insolvency,
reorganization, moratorium or other similar Laws, now or
hereafter in effect, affecting creditors rights generally,
(ii) the remedy of specific performance and injunctive
and other forms of equitable relief may be subject to equitable
defenses and to the discretion of the court before which any
proceeding may be brought and (iii) the Currency Act
(Canada) precludes a court in Canada from rendering judgment in
any currency other than Canadian currency.
(b) At a meeting duly called and held, Portugals
board of directors has unanimously: (i) determined that
this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby
(including the Portugal Share Issuance, the Portugal Charter
Amendment and the Arrangement) are advisable and fair to and in
the best interests of the Portugal and the holders of the
Portugal Common Shares; (ii) authorized and approved this
Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby (including
the Portugal Share Issuance, the Portugal Charter Amendment and
the Arrangement); and (iii) resolved to recommend
approval and adoption of the Portugal Charter Amendment and
approval of the Portugal Share Issuance by its shareholders at
the Portugal Meeting.
4.5. No Conflict; Required
Filings and Consents.
(a) The execution, delivery and performance by Portugal of
this Agreement and the consummation by Portugal of the
transactions contemplated hereby, do not and will not, subject
to obtaining the Portugal Stockholder Approval and receipt of
the Approvals referred to in Section 4.5(b) below,
(i) contravene, conflict with or result in a violation or
breach of any provision of the Portugal Charter Documents or the
equivalent organizational documents of any of Portugals
material Subsidiaries, (ii) contravene, conflict with or
result in a violation or breach of any provisions of any Law
applicable to Portugal or any of its Subsidiaries or by which
its or any of their respective properties is bound or affected,
(iii) require any consent or other action by any Person
under, constitute a default (or an event that, with or without
notice or lapse of time or both, would constitute a default)
under, or cause or permit the termination, amendment,
acceleration, triggering or cancellation or other change of any
right or obligation or the loss of any benefit to which Portugal
or any of its Subsidiaries is entitled under (A) any
provision of any Contract or other instrument binding upon
Portugal or any of its Subsidiaries or (B) any Permit
held by, or affecting, or relating in any way to, the assets or
business of, Portugal or any of its Subsidiaries, or
(iv) result in the creation or imposition of any
Lien on any asset of Portugal or any of its Subsidiaries, other
than such exceptions in the case of clause (ii),
(iii) or (iv) as would not, individually or in the
aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse
Effect with respect to Portugal.
(b) The execution, delivery and performance by Portugal of
this Agreement and the consummation by Portugal of the
transactions contemplated hereby do not, and shall not, require
any Approval, action by or in respect of, filing with or
notification to, any Governmental Entity, to be made or obtained
by Portugal or its Subsidiaries, except for (A) the
Competition Act Approval, (B) the ICA Approval,
(C) the compliance with any applicable requirements
of the HSR Act, including pre-merger notification requirements,
(D) compliance with any applicable requirements of
Council Regulation (EC) 139/2004 of 20 January 2004 on the
control of concentrations between undertakings; (E) any
other applicable competition, merger control, antitrust or
similar Law of foreign Governmental Entities, (F) the
filing with
A-24
the SEC and the mailing to the Portugal shareholders of the
Portugal Proxy Statement, and the filing with the SEC of any
reports that might be required pursuant to the 1934 Act in
connection with this Agreement and the transactions contemplated
hereby, (G) the filing with the Secretary of State of the
State of New York of the restated certificate of incorporation
of Portugal, in the form attached hereto as Exhibit C,
(H) such other filings, authorizations, decisions or
orders as may be required by the rules and regulations of the
NYSE or any state securities or blue sky laws, or by the rules
and policies of the TSX, (I) the Interim Order, the Final
Order and any approvals required by the Interim Order, the Final
Order or filings with the Director under the CBCA and (J)
any other Approvals or Permits, which, if not obtained, would
not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to
have a Material Adverse Effect with respect to Portugal.
4.6. Compliance;
Permits.
(a) Each of Portugal and its Subsidiaries is, and at all
times since January 1, 2004 has been, in compliance with
all Laws and Orders applicable to it or by which its properties
are bound or affected, other than non-compliance matters that
have not had and would not, individually or in the aggregate,
reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect with
respect to Portugal.
(b) Neither Portugal nor any of its Subsidiaries is in
default or violation of (i) any Law or Order applicable
to Portugal or any of its Subsidiaries or by which its or any of
their respective properties is bound or affected, or (ii)
any material Contract, Permit or other instrument or obligation
to which Portugal or any of its Subsidiaries is a party or by
which Portugal or any of its Subsidiaries or its or any of their
respective properties is bound or affected; except, in each
case, for any conflicts, defaults or violations that have not
had and would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably
be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect with respect to
Portugal. To the knowledge of Portugal, no investigation or
review by any Governmental Entity is pending or threatened
against Portugal or its Subsidiaries, other than, in each such
case, those the outcome of which have not had and would not,
individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have
a Material Adverse Effect with respect to Portugal.
(c) Since January 1, 2004 Portugal has complied in all
material respects with the applicable listing and corporate
governance rules and regulations of the NYSE.
(d) Each of Portugal and its Subsidiaries owns, possesses
or has obtained, and is in compliance with, all Permits of or
from any Governmental Entity necessary to conduct its business
as now conducted, except for such failures which have not had
and would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be
expected to have a Material Adverse Effect with respect to
Portugal.
4.7. SEC Filings; Financial
Statements.
(a) Since January 1, 2004, Portugal has filed with the
SEC and NYSE all forms, reports, schedules, prospectuses,
registration statements, proxy or information statements and
other documents required to be filed by Portugal under
applicable Securities Laws (collectively, the Portugal
SEC Reports). The Portugal SEC Reports, at the time
filed (or if amended or superseded by a filing prior to the date
of this Agreement, then on the date of such filing), (i)
complied in all material respects with the requirements of the
applicable Securities Laws and (ii) did not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact required to be stated therein or necessary in order to make
the statements therein, in light of the circumstances under
which they were made, not misleading. None of Portugals
Subsidiaries is required to file any reports or other documents
with the SEC.
(b) The annual audited consolidated financial statements
and the unaudited consolidated interim financial statements
(including, in each case, any related notes thereto) contained
in the Portugal SEC Reports (the Portugal Financial
Statements) complied as to form in all material
respects with the published rules and regulations of the SEC
with respect thereto as of their respective dates, and have been
prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted
accounting principles (US GAAP) applied on a
basis consistent throughout the periods indicated and consistent
with each other (except as may be indicated in the notes thereto
or, in the case of unaudited statements, do not contain
footnotes as permitted by
Form 10-Q under
the 1934 Act) present fairly, in all material respects, the
consolidated
A-25
financial position, results of operations and cash flows of
Portugal and its Subsidiaries as of the dates and for the
periods indicated therein (subject, in the case of unaudited
statements, to normal, recurring year-end adjustments that are
not expected to be material in amount and the absence of notes
thereto) on a consolidated basis.
(c) Since the enactment of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, Portugal
has been and is in compliance in all material respects with the
applicable provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (including,
without limitation, Section 402 thereof) and the rules and
regulations promulgated thereunder.
(d) The books and records of Portugal and its Subsidiaries,
in all material respects, (i) have been maintained in
accordance with good business practices on a basis consistent
with prior years, (ii) state in reasonable detail the
material transactions and dispositions of the assets of Portugal
and its Subsidiaries and (iii) accurately and fairly
reflect the basis for the Portugal Financial Statements.
Portugal has (i) designed and maintains disclosure
controls and procedures to ensure that material information
relating to Portugal and its Subsidiaries is made known to
management of Portugal by others within those entities to allow
timely decisions regarding required disclosure, and (ii)
designed and maintains a system of internal controls over
financial reporting sufficient to provide reasonable assurances
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements, including that (A)
transactions are executed in accordance with managements
general or specific authorization; (B) transactions are
recorded in reasonable detail accurately and fairly as necessary
(x) to permit preparation of consolidated financial
statements in conformity with US GAAP, and that receipts and
expenditures of the issuer are being made only in accordance
with authorizations of management and directors of Portugal and
its Subsidiaries, as applicable, (y) to maintain
accountability of the assets of Portugal and its Subsidiaries
and (z) to provide reasonable assurance regarding
prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use
or disposition of the issuers assets that could have a
material effect on the financial statements; (C) access
to assets is permitted only in accordance with managements
general or specific authorization; and (D) the recorded
accountability of assets is compared with the existing assets at
reasonable intervals and appropriate action is taken with
respect to any differences. The management of Portugal has
disclosed, based on its most recent evaluation, to
Portugals auditors and the audit committee of
Portugals board of directors (i) all significant
deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect Portugals ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified
for Portugals auditors any material weaknesses in internal
controls and (ii) any fraud, whether or not material,
that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in Portugals internal controls.
(e) To the knowledge of Portugal, as of the date hereof,
Portugal has not identified any material weaknesses in the
design or operation of its internal controls over financial
reporting.
(f) PricewaterhouseCoopers LLC are and were at all times
during the audit engagement period with Portugal independent
registered public accountants with respect to Italy and its
Subsidiaries in accordance with the applicable rules and
regulations thereunder adopted by the SEC and the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board.
(g) No attorney representing Portugal or any of its
Subsidiaries, whether or not employed by Portugal or any of its
Subsidiaries, has reported evidence of a violation of any
Securities Laws, breach of fiduciary duty or similar violation
by Portugal or any of its Subsidiaries or their respective
officers, directors, employees or agents to Portugals
chief legal officer, audit committee (or other committee
designated for the purpose) of the board of directors or the
board of directors.
(h) None of the information to be supplied by Portugal or
its Affiliates in writing specifically for use in the Italy
Circular or the Italy Bid Circular will, at the time of the
mailing of the Italy Circular or any notice of variation in
respect of the Italy Bid and any amendments or supplements
thereto, and in the case of the Italy Circular at the time of
the Italy Meeting, contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state any material fact required to be stated
therein or necessary in order to make the statements therein, in
the light of the circumstances under which they are made, not
misleading.
A-26
(i) None of the information to be included in or
incorporated by reference into the Portugal Proxy Statement
(other than information supplied in writing by Italy
specifically for use therein) will, at the time of the mailing
of the Portugal Proxy Statement and any amendments or
supplements thereto, and at the time of the Portugal Meeting,
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
any material fact required to be stated therein or necessary in
order to make the statements therein, in the light of the
circumstances under which they are made, not misleading.
4.8. No Undisclosed
Liabilities. Except as Disclosed to Italy, neither
Portugal nor any of its Subsidiaries has any liabilities
(absolute, accrued, contingent, determined, determinable or
otherwise) or obligations, in each case, of the type that would
be required to be disclosed on a consolidated balance sheet of
Portugal (or the notes thereto) and there is no existing
condition, situation or set of circumstances that could be
reasonably expected to result in such a liability or obligation,
except (i) liabilities or obligations fully reflected or
reserved against in Portugals balance sheet as of
December 31, 2005 (or the notes thereto), included in the
Portugal Financial Statements, (ii) liabilities or
obligations disclosed in any Portugal SEC Report filed after
December 31, 2005, and prior to the date of this Agreement,
(iii) liabilities incurred since December 31,
2005 in the ordinary course of business consistent with past
practice, (iv) obligations arising pursuant to the terms
of the Contracts disclosed in Section 4.20 (or not required
to be so disclosed) or (v) liabilities or obligations
that have not had and would not, individually or in the
aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse
Effect with respect to Portugal.
4.9. Absence of Certain
Changes or Events. Since December 31, 2005, the
business of Portugal and its Subsidiaries has been conducted in
the ordinary course consistent with past practices and except as
Disclosed Publicly by Portugal there has not been (i) any
event, occurrence or development of a state of circumstances or
facts which has had or would, individually or in the aggregate,
reasonably be expected to have any Material Adverse Effect with
respect to Portugal, (ii) any material revaluation by
Portugal of any of its assets, including, without limitation,
writing down the value of capitalized inventory or writing off
notes or accounts receivable or any material sale of assets of
Portugal other than in the ordinary course of business,
(iii) any material damage, destruction or loss (whether
or not covered by insurance) with respect to any material assets
of Portugal or its Subsidiaries, (iv) any Material
Portugal Contract cancelled, terminated, or materially adversely
modified that would reasonably be expected to have a Material
Adverse Effect with respect to Portugal or (v) any event
or action that if taken after the date hereof would be
prohibited by Section 6.1 hereof.
4.10. Absence of
Litigation. Except as Disclosed Publicly by Portugal or
as Disclosed to Italy, (a) there is no Action that
has been commenced or, to the knowledge of Portugal, threatened
against or affecting Portugal or any Subsidiary thereof or any
of their respective properties, rights or assets before any
Governmental Entity which, if determined adversely to Portugal,
would, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected
to have a Material Adverse Effect with respect to Portugal; and
(b) neither Portugal nor any Subsidiary thereof, nor any
of their respective properties, rights or assets is subject to
any outstanding Order that has had or would, individually or in
the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse
Effect with respect to Portugal.
4.11. Employee Plans.
(a) Portugal and each Subsidiary thereof has complied, in
all material respects, with all the terms of, and all applicable
Laws in respect of, each Portugal Employee Plan, and all
Portugal Employee Plans required under applicable Law to be
funded are fully funded and in good standing in all material
respects under applicable Law. Portugal has Disclosed to Italy
copies of all material Portugal Employee Plans (and in the case
of any material Portugal Employee Plan that is not written, a
written description of such plan).
(b) Each Portugal Employee Plan intended to be tax
qualified under the Code has been the subject of determination
letters from the U.S. Internal Revenue Service to the
effect that such plans are qualified and exempt from Federal
income taxes under Sections 401(a) and 501(a),
respectively, of the Code. No step has been taken, no event has
occurred and no condition or circumstance exists that has
resulted or could reasonably be expected to result in any
Portugal Employee Plan being ordered or required to be
terminated in whole or in part or having its tax qualification
refused or revoked, or being placed under the
A-27
administration of any trustee or receiver or regulatory
authority or being required to pay any material Taxes, fees,
penalties or levies under applicable Laws. There are no actions,
suits, claims (other than routine claims for payment of benefits
in the ordinary course), trials, demands, investigations,
arbitrations, or other proceedings which are pending or
threatened in respect of any of the Portugal Employee Plans or
their assets which individually or in the aggregate would have a
Material Adverse Effect with respect to Portugal.
(c) No event has occurred or condition exists with respect
to any of the Portugal Employee Plans or relating to any current
or former employee of Portugal or any Subsidiary thereof (or any
of their beneficiaries or dependants) which, individually or in
the aggregate, is reasonably likely to result in a Material
Adverse Effect with respect to Portugal.
(d) Except as Disclosed Publicly by Portugal or as
Disclosed to Italy, the consummation of the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement will not by itself entitle any
employee or any independent contractor of Portugal or any
Subsidiary thereof to severance or similar pay or accelerate the
time of payment or vesting or trigger any payment of funding
(through a grantor trust or otherwise) or compensation or
benefits under, increase the amount payable or trigger any other
material obligation pursuant to, any Portugal Employee Plan.
(e) The consummation of the transactions contemplated by
this Agreement will not (either alone or upon the occurrence of
additional acts or events) result in any payment under any
Portugal Employee Plan that would constitute an excess
parachute payment for purposes of Section 280G or
4999 of the Code.
4.12. Labor Matters.
(a) Portugal has Disclosed to Italy copies of all
Collective Agreements to which Portugal or any Subsidiary
thereof is a party. To the knowledge of Portugal, there are no
threatened or apparent union organizing activities involving
employees of Portugal or any Subsidiary thereof that are not
already covered by a Collective Agreement that would have a
Material Adverse Effect with respect to Portugal. Neither
Portugal nor any Subsidiary thereof is in material violation of
any provision under any Collective Agreement. There is no strike
or lock out occurring or, to the knowledge of Portugal,
threatened affecting Portugal or any Subsidiary thereof that
would have a Material Adverse Effect with respect to Portugal.
(b) Neither Portugal nor any Subsidiary thereof is subject
to any claim for wrongful dismissal, constructive dismissal or
any other tort claim, actual or threatened, or any litigation,
actual or threatened, relating to its employees or independent
contractors (including any termination of such persons) other
than those claims or such litigation as would not individually
or in the aggregate have a Material Adverse Effect with respect
to Portugal. Portugal and each Subsidiary thereof has operated
in material compliance with all applicable Laws with respect to
employment and labor, including, but not limited to, employment
and labor standards, occupational health and/or safety,
employment equity, pay equity, workers compensation, human
rights and labor relations and there are no current, pending or
threatened proceedings before any board or tribunal with respect
to any of the areas listed herein other than where the failure
to so operate, or for such proceedings which individually or in
the aggregate, would not have a Material Adverse Effect with
respect to Portugal. Portugal and each Subsidiary thereof has
operated in material compliance with the National Labor
Relations Act (U.S.) as amended, and the rules and regulations
promulgated thereunder and any and all similar Laws.
(c) Each of Portugal and its Subsidiaries is in compliance
with all applicable Laws covering occupational health and/or
safety, including the Occupational Health and Safety Act (U.S.),
as amended, except for any non-compliance that would not
reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect with
respect to Portugal.
4.13. Property and
Title. Applying customary standards in the United States
mining industry, each of Portugal, its Subsidiaries and its
material joint ventures has, to the extent necessary to permit
the operation of their respective businesses as presently
conducted: (a) sufficient title, clear of any title defect
or Lien (other than as Disclosed to Italy or Disclosed Publicly
by Portugal) to its operating properties and properties with
estimated proven and probable mineral reserves and/or estimated
mineral resources (other
A-28
than property to which it is lessee, in which case it has a
valid leasehold interest) and (b) good and sufficient title
to the real property interests including, without limitation,
fee simple estate of and in real property, leases, easements,
rights of way, permits, mining claims, concessions or licenses
from landowners or authorities permitting the use of land by
Portugal, its Subsidiaries and its material joint ventures
(other than as Disclosed Publicly by Portugal). Portugal, its
Subsidiaries and its material joint ventures hold all mineral
rights required to continue their respective businesses and
operations as currently conducted and as proposed to be
conducted as Disclosed Publicly by Portugal, except to the
extent that a failure to do so would not constitute a Material
Adverse Effect with respect to Portugal. Except for such
failures of title or liens and royalty burdens that would,
individually or in the aggregate, not have a Material Adverse
Effect with respect to Portugal, (x) all mineral rights
held by Portugal, its Subsidiaries and its material joint
ventures are free and clear of all Liens and royalty burdens
(other than as Publicly Disclosed by Portugal), and
(y) none of such mineral rights are subject to reduction by
reference to mine payout or otherwise except for those created
in the ordinary course of business and which would not have a
Material Adverse Effect with respect to Portugal.
4.14. Mineral Reserves and
Resources. The estimated proven and probable mineral
reserves and estimated, indicated, measured and inferred mineral
resources disclosed in the Portugal SEC Documents as of
December 31, 2005 have been prepared and disclosed in all
material respects in accordance with all applicable Laws. There
has been no material reduction (other than as a result of
operations in the ordinary course of business) in the aggregate
amount of estimated mineral reserves and estimated mineral
resources of Portugal, its Subsidiaries and its material joint
ventures, taken as a whole, from the amounts Disclosed Publicly
by Portugal.
4.15. Operational
Matters. Except as would not, individually or in the
aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse
Effect with respect to Portugal:
|
|
|
(a) all rentals, royalties, overriding royalty interests,
production payments, net profits, interest burdens and other
payments due or payable on or prior to the date hereof under or
with respect to the direct or indirect assets of Portugal, its
Subsidiaries and its material joint ventures have been properly
and timely paid; |
|
|
(b) all rentals, payments, and obligations due and payable
or performable on or prior to the date hereof under or on
account of any of the direct or indirect assets of Portugal, its
Subsidiaries and its material joint ventures have been duly
paid, performed, or provided for prior to the date hereof; |
|
|
(c) all (i) mines where Portugal or a Subsidiary of
Portugal is operator at the relevant time have been developed
and operated in accordance with good mining practices and in
compliance with all then-applicable Laws, and (ii) mines
located in or on the lands of Portugal, any Subsidiary or
material joint venture of Portugal, or lands pooled or unitized
therewith, which have been abandoned by Portugal or any
Subsidiary or material joint venture of Portugal, have been
developed, managed and abandoned in accordance with good mining
practices and in compliance with all applicable Laws, and
(iii) all future abandonment, remediation and reclamation
obligations have been accurately Disclosed Publicly by Portugal
without omission of information necessary to make the disclosure
not misleading, and (iv) all costs, expenses, and
liabilities payable on or prior to the date hereof under the
terms of any Material Portugal Contract have been properly and
timely paid, except for such expenses that are being currently
paid prior to delinquency in the ordinary course of business. |
4.16. Insurance.
Portugal maintains insurance policies covering the assets,
business, equipment, properties, operations, employees, officers
and directors of Portugal and its Subsidiaries (collectively,
the Portugal Insurance Policies) which are of
the type and in amounts which it believes are reasonably
appropriate to conduct its business. To Portugals
knowledge, there is no material claim by Portugal or any of its
Subsidiaries pending under any of the material Portugal
Insurance Policies as to which coverage has been questioned,
denied or disputed by the underwriters of such policies or bonds
that would not have a Material Adverse Effect with respect to
Portugal.
A-29
4.17. Taxes.
(a) Except as Disclosed Publicly by Portugal or as
Disclosed to Italy or as would not, individually or in the
aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse
Effect with respect to Portugal:
|
|
|
(i) All Tax returns, statements, reports, forms,
declarations, remittances, and similar statements (including
estimated Tax returns, claims for refunds, amended returns and
reports and information returns and reports) required to be
filed with any taxing authority by or on behalf of Portugal or
any of its Subsidiaries (collectively, the Portugal
Returns) were filed when due with all appropriate
taxing authorities (including any applicable extension periods)
in accordance with all applicable Laws and were correct and
complete in all material respects. |
|
|
(ii) Portugal and each of its Subsidiaries have timely
paid, or withheld and remitted to the appropriate taxing
authority, all Taxes due and payable by any of them under any
applicable Law, including all Taxes required to be withheld,
collected and paid in connection with (i) amounts paid or
owing to any present or former employee, independent contractor,
creditor or shareholder or to any other Person, (ii) goods
and services received from or provided to any Person and
(iii) amounts paid or credited to any Person not resident
in the jurisdiction of the relevant payor. |
|
|
(iii) The charges, accruals and reserves for Taxes with
respect to Portugal and its Subsidiaries reflected on the
Portugal Financial Statements (whether or not due and whether or
not shown on any Portugal Return but excluding any provision for
deferred income Taxes) are adequate under US GAAP to cover
Taxes accruing through the date thereof. |
|
|
(iv) The tax basis of the assets of Portugal and its
Subsidiaries by category including the classification of such
assets as being depreciable or amortizable as reflected in the
Portugal Returns is true and correct in all material respects. |
|
|
(v) There is no Action or audit now pending or threatened
in writing in respect of any Tax or tax asset of
Portugal or any of its Subsidiaries. There are no reassessments
of Portugals or any of its Subsidiaries Taxes that
have been issued and which remain outstanding. |
|
|
(vi) Neither Portugal nor any of its Subsidiaries is party
to any tax sharing agreement, tax indemnification agreement or
other agreement or arrangement relating to Taxes with any Person
(other than Portugal or any of its Subsidiaries). Neither
Portugal nor any of its Subsidiaries has been a member of an
affiliated, combined or unitary group filing a consolidated,
combined, unitary or other return for U.S. federal, state,
local or
non-U.S. tax
purposes reflecting the income, assets or activities of
affiliated companies (other than a group the common parent of
which is Portugal), or has any liability for the Taxes of any
other Person (other than Portugal or any of its Subsidiaries)
under any provision of U.S. federal, state, local or
non-U.S. law, or
as a transferee or successor, or by contract, or otherwise. |
(b) Tax Status. Portugal is not, and
immediately prior to the Effective Time Portugal will not be, a
foreign investment entity within the meaning of the
ITA assuming the enactment into law and the proclamation into
force of proposed sections 94.1 to 94.4 and related provisions
as contained in the draft legislation released on behalf of the
Minister of Finance dated July 18, 2005 or in a form
substantially similar to such proposed sections.
4.18. Environmental
Matters. Except as Disclosed Publicly by Portugal or
except for items with respect to which adequate provision in
accordance with US GAAP has been made in the Portugal Financial
Statements or except as has not had and would not reasonably be
expected to result, individually or in the aggregate, in a
Material Adverse Effect with respect to Portugal:
|
|
|
(a) (i) No Hazardous Substance has been discharged,
disposed of, dumped, pumped, deposited, spilled, leaked, emitted
or released by Portugal or any of its Subsidiaries (or, to the
knowledge of Portugal, is otherwise present) at, on, under or
from any property now or previously owned, leased or operated by
Portugal or any of its Subsidiaries (Portugal
Property) in such manner or quantity that exceeds
remediation criteria or standards under any applicable
Environmental Laws or as would |
A-30
|
|
|
require investigation or remediation (either by Portugal or its
Subsidiaries, or for which Portugal or its Subsidiaries would
otherwise be liable) under any applicable Environmental Laws or
as would adversely affect the business or operations of Portugal
or any of its Subsidiaries and (ii) to the knowledge of
Portugal, there are no liabilities of Portugal or any of its
Subsidiaries arising out of any Environmental Laws or any
agreement with a third party and relating to any Hazardous
Substances at, on, under or about any property other than a
Portugal Property. |
|
|
(b) The operations of Portugal and each of its Subsidiaries
are and have been in compliance with all, and have not violated
any, applicable Environmental Laws. |
|
|
(c) (i) Portugal and its Subsidiaries hold all
approvals, certificates, authorizations, agreements, permits,
licenses, certificates, clearances and consents under or
pursuant to applicable Environmental Laws (the Portugal
Environmental Permits) necessary for the conduct of
Portugals and its Subsidiaries businesses as
conducted currently and through the most recent fiscal year,
(ii) all such Portugal Environmental Permits are valid
and in full force and effect, (iii) Portugal and its
Subsidiaries have not violated any such Portugal Environmental
Permits, and (iv) neither Portugal nor any of its
Subsidiaries has received any notice that any Portugal
Environmental Permits will be revoked, adversely modified or not
renewed, and to the knowledge of Portugal there is no reasonable
basis for revoking, adversely modifying or refusing to renew any
such Portugal Environmental Permits. |
|
|
(d) No Order or Action is pending, and to Portugals
knowledge, no Order or Action has been threatened, by any
Governmental Entity or third party against or, to
Portugals knowledge, affecting Portugal or any of its
Subsidiaries concerning any alleged violation of or liability
under any Environmental Law or concerning any Hazardous
Substance. |
|
|
(e) No Environmental Lien is pending, and to
Portugals knowledge, no Environmental Lien has been
threatened against or affecting Portugal, any of its
Subsidiaries, or any real or personal property of Portugal or
any of its Subsidiaries. |
4.19. Intellectual
Property. Except as would not, individually or in the
aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse
Effect with respect to Portugal, (i) Portugal or one or
more of its Subsidiaries is the owner or has the right to use
all Intellectual Property and Proprietary Subject Matter used in
the conduct of its business as it is currently conducted (such
Intellectual Property which is owned or used by Portugal or one
of its Subsidiaries, the Portugal Intellectual
Property and such Proprietary Subject Matter, the
Portugal-Used Proprietary Subject Matter),
free and clear of all Liens; (ii) there are no
Orders or Actions pending, or to Portugals knowledge,
threatened, respecting the ownership, validity, enforceability
or use of any Portugal Intellectual Property or Portugal-Used
Proprietary Subject Matter, and to the knowledge of Portugal, no
facts or circumstances exist as a valid basis for same;
(iii) the Portugal Intellectual Property has not
been, and Portugal has no reason to expect it to become,
abandoned, cancelled or invalidated; (iv) Portugal and
its Subsidiaries have taken all reasonable actions to protect
the Portugal Intellectual Property, including Portugal
Intellectual Property that is confidential in nature; and
(v) to the knowledge of Portugal the conduct of the
business of Portugal and its Subsidiaries as currently conducted
does not Infringe any Intellectual Property of any Person and no
Person is currently Infringing Portugal Intellectual Property.
4.20. Agreements, Contracts
and Commitments. Except as Publicly Disclosed by
Portugal or as limited by confidentiality obligations and
applicable regulatory requirements, Portugal has Disclosed to
Italy (prior to the date hereof with respect to contracts
existing on the date hereof) each material Contract to which
Portugal and each of its Subsidiaries is a party (each, a
Material Portugal Contract). Except for
breaches, violations or defaults which have not had and would
not, individually or in the aggregate, have a Material Adverse
Effect with respect to Portugal, (i) each of the Material
Portugal Contracts is valid and in full force and effect,
unamended, and (ii) neither Portugal nor any of its
Subsidiaries, nor to Portugals knowledge any other party
to a Material Portugal Contracts, has violated any material
provision of, or committed or failed to perform any act which,
with or without notice, lapse of time, or both, would constitute
a material default under the provisions of any such Material
Portugal Contracts, and neither Portugal nor any of its
Subsidiaries has received written notice that it has breached,
A-31
violated or defaulted under, any of the material terms or
conditions of any of the Material Portugal Contracts. Neither
Portugal nor any Subsidiary of Portugal is a party to, or
otherwise a guarantor of or liable with respect to, any interest
rate, currency or other swap or derivative transaction, other
than any such transactions in the ordinary course of business.
4.21. Brokers.
Portugal and its Subsidiaries have not incurred, nor will they
incur, directly or indirectly, any liability for brokerage or
finders fees or agents commissions or any similar charges
in connection with this Agreement or any transaction
contemplated hereby, except for the fees of Citigroup Global
Markets Inc. and HSBC Securities (USA) Inc.
4.22. Vote Required.
The only votes of the holders of any class or series of
Portugals capital stock or other securities of Portugal
necessary to approve the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement are: (i) the affirmative vote in favor of the
Portugal Charter Amendment of the holders of a majority of the
outstanding Portugal Common Shares and (ii) the
affirmative vote in favor of the Portugal Share Issuance of a
majority of the votes cast thereon by the holders of the
outstanding Portugal Common Shares (provided that the total
votes cast on the Portugal Share Issuance represent at least a
majority of the Portugal Common Shares issued and outstanding
and entitled to vote at the Portugal Meeting) (such approvals,
collectively, the Portugal Stockholder
Approval).
4.23. Portugal Common
Shares. The Portugal Common Shares to be issued pursuant
to the Arrangement will be duly and validly issued by Portugal,
fully paid and non-assessable and free of preemptive rights,
encumbrances, charges and liens on their respective dates of
issue.
4.24. No Other
Representations and Warranties. Except for the
representations and warranties contained in this Agreement,
neither Portugal nor its Subsidiaries nor any other Person or
its Subsidiaries makes any representation or warranty, express
or implied, on behalf of Portugal and its Subsidiaries with
respect to the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
ARTICLE V
COVENANTS OF ITALY
5.1. Conduct of
Business. During the period from the date of this
Agreement to the Effective Time, except as provided in
Section 5.1 of the Disclosure Schedule or as otherwise
expressly contemplated or permitted in this Agreement and except
to the extent Portugal shall otherwise give its prior written
consent, not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed, each of
Italy and its Subsidiaries shall: (i) conduct its
business in the ordinary course and consistent with past
practice and in compliance in all material respects with
applicable Laws; (ii) pay or perform its material
obligations when due; and (iii) use its commercially
reasonable efforts consistent with past practices to: (A)
preserve intact its present business organization, (B)
keep available the services of its present officers and
employees, (C) preserve in all material respects its
relationships with customers, suppliers, distributors, joint
venture partners, and others with which it has significant
business dealings, and (D) preserve in all material
respects the Italy Intellectual Property. Without limiting the
generality of the foregoing, except as provided in
Section 5.1 of the Italy Disclosure Schedule or as
expressly contemplated by this Agreement or the Plan of
Arrangement, without the prior written consent of Portugal (not
to be unreasonably withheld or delayed, except with respect to
paragraph (l) below), during the period from the date
of this Agreement to the Effective Time, Italy shall not, and
shall not permit any of its Subsidiaries to, do any of the
following:
|
|
|
(a) amend its articles of incorporation or by-laws or other
applicable governing instruments; |
|
|
(b) split, combine, subdivide or reclassify any shares of
its capital stock or other equity interests or declare, set
aside or pay any dividend or other distribution (whether in
cash, stock or property or any combination thereof) in respect
of its capital stock, or redeem, repurchase or otherwise acquire
or offer to redeem, repurchase, or otherwise acquire any of its
securities, except for (i) cash dividends with respect to
the Italy Common Shares in the ordinary course, in each case
with usual declaration, record and payment dates and in
accordance with Italys current dividend policy and
(ii) dividends |
A-32
|
|
|
paid to Italy or any of its Subsidiaries by any Subsidiary that
is, directly or indirectly, wholly-owned by Italy; and
(iii) dividends paid by non-wholly owned Subsidiaries in
the ordinary course consistent with current dividend policy; |
|
|
(c) adopt a plan or agreement of complete or partial
liquidation, dissolution, winding up, merger, consolidation,
amalgamation, restructuring, recapitalization or other material
reorganization (other than in connection with the transactions
contemplated by the Support Agreement or a merger, amalgamation
or consolidation between wholly owned Subsidiaries of Italy); |
|
|
(d) issue, deliver or sell, or authorize the issuance,
delivery or sale of, any shares of its capital stock of any
class or other equity interests or any securities convertible
into or exercisable for, or any rights, warrants or options to
acquire, any such capital stock or other equity interests, other
than (i) the issuances of Italy Common Shares upon
the exercise of Italy Options outstanding on the date hereof or
issued after the date hereof in compliance with the terms of
this Agreement in accordance with their present terms,
(ii) grants of options to its employees and directors in
the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice,
using Italys standard form of stock option award agreement
as of the date hereof, up to a maximum of 1,114,000 optioned
Italy Common Shares in the aggregate in calendar year 2006 and
1,114,000 optioned Italy Common Shares in the aggregate in
calendar year 2007 (and up to a further 750,000 optioned Italy
Common Shares following the satisfaction of the France
Condition), provided that none of the Italy Options
referred to in this clause shall accelerate or become vested as
a result of the consummation of the transactions contemplated by
this Agreement, (iii) issuances of Italy Common Shares
required pursuant to the conversion of convertible securities
outstanding on the date hereof, and (iv) issuances of
Italy Common Shares and Italy Options in connection with the
acquisition of France pursuant to and on the terms set forth in
the Support Agreement; |
|
|
(e) except as required to ensure that any Italy Employee
Plan in effect on the date of this Agreement is not then out of
compliance with applicable Law or as specifically required or
permitted pursuant to this Agreement or as provided in the Italy
Disclosure Schedule or as required in connection with the
termination of Italys Non-Employee Director Share
Ownership Plan or the payment of any amount to the holders of
deferred share units issued under such plan in consideration for
the cancellation of such deferred share units, (A) adopt,
enter into, terminate or amend any Italy Employee Plan, other
than in the ordinary course of business consistent with past
practice, (B) increase in any manner the compensation or
benefits of, or pay any bonus to, any employee of Italy or its
Subsidiaries, except for increases in base salary or payments of
bonuses in the ordinary course of business consistent with past
practice, as required to comply with any Italy Employee Plan in
effect on the date of this Agreement, or in 2007 in connection
with annual performance assessments consistent with past
practice, (C) pay or provide to any employee of Italy or
its Subsidiaries any benefit not provided for under an Italy
Employee Plan as in effect on the date of this Agreement, other
than the payment of base compensation in the ordinary course of
business consistent with prior practice or as permitted by
clause (B) above, (D) except to the extent expressly
permitted under Section 5.1(d), grant any awards under any
Italy Employee Plan (including the grant of stock or other
equity options, stock or other equity appreciation rights,
performance units, restricted stock or other equity, stock or
other equity purchase rights or other stock or other
equity-based or stock-related awards) or remove existing
restrictions in any Italy Employee Plan or awards made
thereunder, (E) take any action to fund or in any other way
secure the payment of compensation or benefits under any Italy
Employee Plan, except as required to comply with any Italy
Employee Plan as in effect on the date of this Agreement or
(F) take any action to accelerate the vesting or payment of
any compensation or benefits under any Italy Employee Plan; |
|
|
(f) acquire (by merger, consolidation, acquisition of stock
or assets or otherwise), directly or indirectly, any material
business, other than the acquisition of France pursuant to and
on the terms set forth in the Support Agreement; |
A-33
|
|
|
(g) other than pursuant to Contracts in effect as of the
date hereof and other than sales of inventory in the ordinary
course of business consistent with past practice, sell, lease,
license (as licensor or licensee), assign, encumber or otherwise
transfer in one transaction or any series of related
transactions, any material assets or material rights; |
|
|
(h) incur, assume or guarantee any indebtedness for
borrowed money or issue or sell any debt securities or warrants
or other rights to acquire debt securities or enter into any
keep-well or other arrangements to maintain the financial
condition of any other Person, other than short-term borrowings
in the ordinary course of business and in amounts and on terms
consistent with past practices and indebtedness incurred in
connection with the payment to the shareholders of France of the
cash consideration provided for in the Support Agreement (for
greater certainty, including payments to dissenting shareholders
with respect to the France Subsequent Acquisition Transaction); |
|
|
(i) make any loan, advance or capital contribution to or
investment in any Person, other than (i) loans,
advances or capital contributions to or investments in its
Subsidiaries or pursuant to Contracts in effect at the date
hereof, (ii) in connection with acquisitions permitted by
Section 5.1(e), or (iii) in the ordinary course
of business consistent with past practice, to the extent not
individually or in the aggregate material to Italy; provided
that none of such transactions permitted by this
clause (iii) shall present a material risk of delaying or
impairing the parties ability to consummate the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement; |
|
|
(j) change (i) its methods of accounting or
accounting practices in any material respect, except as required
by concurrent changes in Canadian GAAP or by Law and concurred
in by Italys external auditors or (ii) its fiscal
year; |
|
|
(k) take any action that would, or would reasonably be
expected to, prevent or materially impair or delay the ability
of Italy to consummate the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement, including the Arrangement and the transactions
contemplated by the Arrangement; |
|
|
(l) enter into, cancel, terminate, or grant any waiver in
respect of any Support Agreement Contract or any Contract that
would be a Support Agreement Contract if in effect on the date
hereof; it being understood and agreed between the parties that,
notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth herein, after
consultation with Portugal, Italy may, at its sole discretion,
terminate any Support Agreement Contract in accordance with its
terms; |
|
|
(m) file any registration statement under the 1933 Act
or an amendment to any 1933 Act registration statement
(other than an amendment to its registration statement on
Form F-8 relating
to the Italy Bid); or |
|
|
(n) agree or commit to do any of the foregoing. |
5.2. Shareholders
Meeting.
(a) Subject to the terms of this Agreement, Italy shall use
its reasonable best efforts to cause the Italy Meeting to be
held as soon as reasonably practicable after the date hereof,
provided that (x) the Italy Meeting shall not be
held until counsel to Italy has had reasonable opportunity to
review all comments from the staff of the SEC relating to the
Portugal Proxy Statement or been advised in writing that the
staff of the SEC will not have any comments thereon and
(y) this covenant shall not restrict the ability of Italy
to postpone or adjourn such meeting to the extent that
Italys outside counsel advises Italy that it would be
appropriate to do so for the purpose of allowing the holders of
Italy Common Shares to review any additional disclosure that
Italy, with the advice of its outside counsel, determines in
good faith is advisable and should be made available to such
holders by means of a supplemental management information
circular or otherwise.
(b) Subject to the terms hereof, Italy shall, promptly
after the execution and delivery of this Agreement
(i) finalize the notice of the Italy Meeting to be sent to
holders of Italy Common Shares, the accompanying management
information circular, and any other documents required by
applicable Laws to be sent to holders of Italy Common Shares in
connection with the Italy Meeting (such documents, as
A-34
amended, supplemented or otherwise modified, the Italy
Circular), and (ii) cause the Italy Circular and
any other such documents to be sent to each holder of Italy
Common Shares and filed as required by the Interim Order and
applicable Laws.
(c) Subject to the terms of this Agreement, Italy shall
(i) take all lawful action to solicit in favor of the
Italy Resolution and the Italy Shareholder Approval, (ii)
recommend to all holders of Italy Common Shares that they vote
in favor of this Agreement and the Arrangement and the other
transactions contemplated hereby and thereby and (iii)
not withdraw, modify or qualify (or publicly propose to or
publicly state that it intends to withdraw, modify or qualify)
in any manner adverse to Portugal such recommendation (any such
action, a Change in Italy Recommendation)
except as explicitly permitted by Section 5.3(b) provided,
however, that Italy may (A) make such Change in Italy
Recommendation if Italys board of directors, after
consultation with outside legal counsel, has determined that
failure to take such action would be inconsistent with its
fiduciary duties under applicable Law and (B) upon such
Change in Italy Recommendation, may solicit votes of the Italy
shareholders consistent with such Change in Italy Recommendation.
5.3. No Solicitation;
Opportunity to Match.
(a) Italy shall not, directly or indirectly, through any
officer, director, employee, representative (including for
greater certainty any financial or other advisors) or agent of
Italy or any Subsidiary of Italy: (i) solicit, assist,
initiate, encourage or otherwise facilitate (including by way of
furnishing non-public information or permitting any visit to any
facilities or properties of Italy or any Subsidiary of Italy,
including any material joint ventures or material mineral
properties) any inquiries, proposals or offers regarding any
Acquisition Proposal; (ii) engage in any discussions or
negotiations regarding, or provide any confidential information
with respect to, any Acquisition Proposal, provided that for
greater certainty, Italy may advise any Person making an
unsolicited Acquisition Proposal that such Acquisition Proposal
does not constitute a Superior Proposal when the Italy board of
directors has so determined; (iii) withdraw, modify or
qualify, or propose publicly to withdraw, modify or qualify, in
any manner adverse to Portugal, the approval or recommendation
of the Italy board of directors or any committee thereof of this
Agreement; (iv) approve or recommend, or remain neutral
with respect to, or propose publicly to approve or recommend, or
remain neutral with respect to, any Acquisition Proposal (it
being understood that publicly taking no position or a neutral
position with respect to an Acquisition Proposal until 15
calendar days following the formal commencement of such
Acquisition Proposal shall not be considered to be in violation
of this Section 5.3(a)); or (v) accept or enter into,
or publicly propose to accept or enter into, any letter of
intent, agreement in principle, agreement, arrangement or
undertaking related to any Acquisition Proposal.
(b) Notwithstanding Section 5.3(a) and any other
provision of this Agreement, the Italy board of directors shall
be permitted to: (i) make a Change in Italy Recommendation,
provided that Italy shall have complied in all material respects
with all requirements of Section 5.3(f) below; and/or
(ii) engage in discussions or negotiations with, or provide
information pursuant to Section 5.3(b) to, any Person in
response to an Acquisition Proposal by any such Person, provided
that (A) it has received an unsolicited bona fide written
Acquisition Proposal from such Person and the Italy board of
directors has determined in good faith based on information then
available and after consultation with its financial advisors
that such Acquisition Proposal constitutes a Superior Proposal
or could reasonably be expected to result in a Superior
Proposal; and (B) prior to providing any confidential
information or data to such Person in connection with such
Acquisition Proposal, (x) the Italy board of directors
receives from such Person an executed confidentiality agreement
which includes a standstill provision that restricts such Person
from acquiring, or publicly announcing an intention to acquire,
any securities or assets of Italy (other than pursuant to a
Superior Proposal) for a period of not less than one year from
the date of such confidentiality agreement and Italy sends a
copy of any such confidentiality agreement to Portugal promptly
upon its execution and promptly provides Portugal a list of, or
in the case of information that was not previously made
available to Portugal, copies of, any information provided to
such Person, and (y) Italy has complied in all material
respects with Section 5.3(d).
A-35
(c) Italy will cease and cause to be terminated any
existing solicitation, encouragement, activity, discussion or
negotiation with any Person by Italy or any Subsidiary thereof
or any of its or their representatives or agents with respect to
any Acquisition Proposal, whether or not initiated by Italy,
and, in connection therewith, Italy will discontinue access to
any data rooms (virtual or otherwise) and will request (and
reasonably exercise all rights it has to require) the return or
destruction of all information regarding Italy and its
Subsidiaries previously provided to any such Person or any other
Person and will request (and reasonably exercise all rights it
has to require) the destruction of all material including or
incorporating or otherwise reflecting any information regarding
Italy and its Subsidiaries. Italy shall not terminate, amend,
modify or waive any provision of any confidentiality or
standstill or similar agreement to which Italy or any of its
Subsidiaries is a party with any other Person, other than to
allow such Person to make and consummate a Superior Proposal.
(d) From and after the date of this Agreement, Italy shall
promptly (and in any event within 24 hours) notify
Portugal, at first orally and then in writing, of any proposal,
inquiry, offer (or any amendment thereto) or any request for
discussions or negotiations in each case or request relating to
or constituting an Acquisition Proposal, any request for
representation on the Italy board of directors, or any request
for non-public information relating to Italy or any Subsidiary
of Italy or any material joint venture or material mineral
property relating to or constituting an Acquisition Proposal of
which Italys directors, officers, representatives or
agents are or became aware. Such notice shall include a
description of the terms and conditions of, and the identity of
the Person making, any proposal, inquiry, offer (including any
amendment thereto) or request, and shall include copies of any
such proposal or offer or any amendment to such proposal or
offer. Italy shall also provide such other details of the
proposal or offer, or any amendment thereto, as Portugal may
reasonably request. Italy shall keep Portugal promptly and fully
informed of the status, including any change to the material
terms, of any such proposal or offer, or any amendment thereto,
and will respond promptly to all inquiries by Portugal with
respect thereto.
(e) Italy shall ensure that its officers, directors,
representatives, agents and legal and financial advisors, and
its Subsidiaries and their officers, directors, representatives,
agents and legal and financial advisors, are aware of the
provisions of Sections 5.3(a) to 5.3(d) hereof and agree to
be bound thereby, and it shall be responsible for any breach of
such provisions by any of them or by any employee of Italy or
any Subsidiary.
(f) Italy shall not make any Change in Italy Recommendation
in respect of, or enter into any agreement relating to, an
Acquisition Proposal (other than a confidentiality agreement
contemplated by Section 5.3(b)(ii)(B) above) unless:
|
|
|
(i) the Acquisition Proposal constitutes a Superior
Proposal; |
|
|
(ii) Italy has provided Portugal with notice in writing
that there is a Superior Proposal together with all
documentation detailing the Superior Proposal (including a copy
of the confidentiality agreement between Italy and the Person
making the Superior Proposal if not previously delivered); |
|
|
(iii) at least 10 business days shall have elapsed from the
date that Portugal has received a copy of the written proposal
in respect of the purported Superior Proposal (or any amendment
or revision thereof); |
|
|
(iv) if Portugal has proposed to amend the terms of the
Arrangement and this Agreement in accordance with
Section 5.3(g), the Italy board of directors (after
receiving advice from its financial advisors and outside legal
counsel) shall have determined in good faith that the
Acquisition Proposal continues to constitute a Superior Proposal
after taking into account such amendments; |
|
|
(v) Italys board of directors, after consultation
with outside legal counsel, determines in good faith that the
failure to take such action would be inconsistent with its
fiduciary duties under all applicable Laws; and |
A-36
|
|
|
(vi) prior to entering into an agreement relating to such
Superior Proposal (other than the aforesaid confidentiality
agreement) Italy shall have terminated this Agreement pursuant
to Section 9.1(j) and paid to Portugal the Italy
Termination Fee. |
(g) Italy acknowledges and agrees that, during the 10
business day period referred to in Section 5.3(f)(iii),
Portugal shall have the opportunity, but not the obligation, to
propose to amend the terms of the Arrangement and this
Agreement. The Italy board of directors will review any proposal
by Portugal to amend the terms of the Arrangement and this
Agreement in order to determine, in good faith in the exercise
of its fiduciary duties, whether such proposal would result in
the Acquisition Proposal not being a Superior Proposal compared
to the proposed amendments to the terms of the Arrangement and
this Agreement.
(h) Nothing in this Agreement shall prevent the Italy board
of directors from responding through a directors circular
or otherwise as required by applicable Securities Laws to any
Acquisition Proposal or from calling and holding a meeting of
the holders of the Italy Common Shares requisitioned by such
shareholders pursuant to Section 143 of the CBCA or ordered
to be held by a court pursuant to section 144 of the CBCA.
(i) Italy acknowledges and agrees that each successive
modification of the material terms of any Acquisition Proposal
shall constitute a new Acquisition Proposal for purposes of this
Section 5.3.
(j) When used in this Agreement, the following terms shall
have the following meanings:
|
|
|
Acquisition Proposal means:
(i) any merger, take-over bid, amalgamation, plan of
arrangement, business combination, consolidation,
recapitalization, liquidation or
winding-up in respect
of Italy; (ii) any sale or acquisition of 20% or more of
the fair market value of the assets of Italy on a consolidated
basis; (iii) any sale or acquisition of 20% or more of
Italys shares of any class or rights or interests therein
or thereto; (iv) any sale of any material interest in any
material joint ventures or material mineral properties;
(v) any similar business combination or transaction, of or
involving Italy, any material Subsidiary of Italy or material
joint venture of Italy, other than with Portugal; or
(vi) any proposal or offer to, or public announcement of an
intention to do, any of the foregoing from any Person other than
Portugal, provided, however, that the term
Acquisition Proposal shall not include the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement or the Support
Agreement. |
|
|
Superior Proposal means an unsolicited
bona fide Acquisition Proposal made by a third party to Italy in
writing after the date hereof: (i) to purchase or otherwise
acquire, directly or indirectly, by means of a merger, take-over
bid, amalgamation, plan of arrangement, business combination,
consolidation, recapitalization, liquidation,
winding-up or similar
transaction, all of the Italy Common Shares; (ii) that is
reasonably capable of being completed, taking into account all
legal, financial, regulatory (including U.S. and European
Competition Authority and any Investment Canada approval) and
other aspects of such proposal and the party making such
proposal; (iii) in respect of which any required financing
to complete such Acquisition Proposal has been demonstrated to
the satisfaction of the Italy board of directors, acting in good
faith (after receipt of advice from its financial advisors and
outside legal counsel), is reasonably likely to be obtained,
(iv) that is not subject to any due diligence condition;
(v) that is offered or made available to all shareholders
of Italy in Canada and the United States on the same terms; and
(vi) in respect of which the Italy board of directors
determines in good faith (after receipt of advice from its
financial advisors with respect to (y) below and outside
legal counsel with respect to (x) below) that
(x) failure to recommend such Acquisition Proposal to
Italys shareholders would be inconsistent with its
fiduciary duties and (y) such Acquisition Proposal taking
into account all of the terms and conditions thereof, if
consummated in accordance with its terms (but not assuming away
any risk of non-completion), would result in a transaction more
favorable to shareholders from a financial point of view than
the Arrangement (including any adjustment to the terms and
conditions of the Arrangement and this Agreement proposed by
Portugal pursuant to Section 5.3(g), and taking into
account the long-term value and anticipated synergies
anticipated to be realized as a result of the combination of
Portugal and Italy). |
A-37
5.4. Dissent Rights.
Italy shall provide Portugal with a copy of any purported
exercise of the Dissent Rights and written communications with
such Italy shareholder purportedly exercising the Dissent
Rights; and not settle or compromise any Action brought by any
present, former or purported holder of any of its securities in
connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement,
including the Arrangement, without the prior written consent of
Portugal, not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed.
5.5. Italy
Affiliates. At least 10 days prior to the Italy
Meeting, Italy shall provide to Portugal a list of those persons
who may be deemed to be, in Italys reasonable judgment,
affiliates of Italy within the meaning of Rule 145
promulgated under the 1933 Act.
5.6. Preference Shares and
Convertible Debentures. At the request of Portugal, in
the event that Italy acquires control of France, Italy shall
cause France to use its reasonable best efforts to redeem or
repurchase all outstanding France preference shares and
convertible debentures (including, without limitation, making
offers to purchase any class of preference shares that are not
redeemable at Frances option on such terms and conditions
as are reasonably acceptable to Portugal and Italy). Without the
prior written approval of Portugal, Italy will not cause France
to amalgamate with Italy prior to the time that all convertible
debentures and preference shares of France (whether or not
redeemable at Frances option) have been redeemed or
repurchased in full.
ARTICLE VI
COVENANTS OF PORTUGAL
6.1. Conduct of
Business. During the period from the date of this
Agreement to the Effective Time, except as otherwise expressly
contemplated or permitted in this Agreement and except to the
extent Italy shall otherwise give its prior written consent, not
to be unreasonably withheld or delayed, each of Portugal and its
Subsidiaries shall: (i) conduct its business in the
ordinary course and consistent with past practice and in
compliance in all material respects with applicable Laws;
(ii) pay or perform its material obligations when due;
and (iii) use its commercially reasonable efforts
consistent with past practices to: (A) preserve intact
its present business organization, (B) keep available the
services of its present officers and employees, (C)
preserve in all material respects its relationships with
customers, suppliers, distributors, joint venture partners and
others with which it has significant business dealings, and
(D) preserve in all material respects the Portugal
Intellectual Property. Without limiting the generality of the
foregoing, except as provided in Section 6.1 of the
Portugal Disclosure Schedule or as expressly contemplated by
this Agreement or the Plan of Arrangement, without the prior
written consent of Italy, not to be unreasonably withheld or
delayed, during the period from the date of this Agreement to
the Effective Time, Portugal shall not, and shall not permit any
of its Subsidiaries to, do any of the following:
|
|
|
(a) amend its certificate of incorporation or by-laws or
other applicable governing instruments; |
|
|
(b) split, combine, subdivide or reclassify any shares of
its capital stock or other equity interests or declare, set
aside or pay any dividend or other distribution (whether in
cash, stock or property or any combination thereof) in respect
of its capital stock, or redeem, repurchase or otherwise acquire
or offer to redeem, repurchase, or otherwise acquire any of its
securities, except for (i) cash dividends with respect to
the Portugal Common Shares, consistent with past practice and in
the ordinary course, in each case with usual declaration, record
and payment dates and in accordance with Portugals current
dividend policy and (ii) dividends paid to Portugal or
any of its Subsidiaries by any Subsidiary of Portugal; |
|
|
(c) adopt a plan or agreement of complete or partial
liquidation, dissolution, merger, consolidation, amalgamation,
restructuring, recapitalization or other material reorganization
(other than a merger, amalgamation or consolidation between
wholly owned Subsidiaries of Portugal); |
|
|
(d) issue, deliver or sell, or authorize the issuance,
delivery or sale of, any shares of its capital stock of any
class or other equity interests or any securities convertible
into or exercisable for, or any rights, warrants or options to
acquire, any such capital stock or other equity interests, other
than |
A-38
|
|
|
(i) the issuances of Portugal Common Shares upon the
exercise of stock options outstanding on the date hereof or
issued after the date hereof in compliance with the terms of
this Agreement in accordance with their present terms,
(ii) grants of options, restricted shares, and/or
deferred stock units to its employees and directors in the
ordinary course of business consistent with past practice, using
Portugals standard form of award agreement as of the date
hereof, in respect of a maximum of 500,000 Portugal Common
Shares in the aggregate; or (iii) issuances of Portugal
Common Shares required pursuant to the conversion of convertible
securities outstanding on the date hereof; |
|
|
(e) except as required to ensure that any Portugal Employee
Plan in effect on the date of this Agreement is not then out of
compliance with applicable Law or as specifically required or
permitted pursuant to this Agreement or as provided in the
Portugal Disclosure Schedule, (A) adopt, enter into,
terminate or amend any Portugal Employee Plan, other than in the
ordinary course of business consistent with past practice, (B)
increase in any manner the compensation or benefits of, or pay
any bonus to, any employee of Portugal or its Subsidiaries,
except for increases in base salary or payments of bonuses in
the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice or
as required to comply with any Portugal Employee Plan in effect
on the date of this Agreement, or in 2007 in connection with
annual performance assessments consistent with past practices,
(C) pay or provide to any employee of Portugal or its
Subsidiaries any benefit not provided for under any Portugal
Employee Plan as in effect on the date of this Agreement, other
than the payment of base compensation in the ordinary course of
business consistent with prior practice or as permitted by
clause (B) above, (D) except to the extent
expressly permitted under Section 6.1(d), grant any awards
under any Portugal Employee Plan (including the grant of stock
or other equity options, stock or other equity appreciation
rights, performance units, restricted stock or other equity,
stock or other equity purchase rights or other stock or other
equity-based or stock-related awards) or remove existing
restrictions in any Portugal Employee Plan or awards made
thereunder, (E) take any action to fund or in any other way
secure the payment of compensation or benefits under any
Portugal Employee Plan, except as required to comply with any
Portugal Employee Plan as in effect on the date of this
Agreement or (F) take any action to accelerate the vesting
or payment of any compensation or benefits under any Portugal
Employee Plan; |
|
|
(f) acquire (by merger, consolidation, acquisition of stock
or assets or otherwise), directly or indirectly, any material
business; |
|
|
(g) other than pursuant to Contracts in effect as of the
date hereof and other than sales of inventory in the ordinary
course of business consistent with past practice, sell, lease,
license (as licensor or licensee), assign, encumber or otherwise
transfer in one transaction or any series of related
transactions, any material assets or material rights; |
|
|
(h) incur, assume or guarantee any indebtedness for
borrowed money or issue or sell any debt securities or warrants
or other rights to acquire debt securities, or enter into any
keep-well or other arrangements to maintain the financial
condition of any other Person, other than short-term borrowings
in the ordinary course of business and in amounts and on terms
consistent with past practices; |
|
|
(i) make any loan, advance or capital contribution to or
investment in any Person, other than (i) loans,
advances or capital contributions to or investments in its
Subsidiaries or pursuant to Contracts in effect at the date
hereof, (ii) in connection with acquisitions permitted by
Section 6.1(e), or (iii) in the ordinary course
of business consistent with past practice, to the extent not
individually or in the aggregate material to Portugal; provided
that none of such transactions permitted by this
clause (iii) shall present a material risk of delaying
or impairing the parties ability to consummate the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement; |
|
|
(j) change (i) its methods of accounting or
accounting practices in any material respect, except as required
by concurrent changes in US GAAP (or the permitted early
adoption of such changes) or by Law and concurred in by
Portugals external auditors or (ii) its fiscal year; |
A-39
|
|
|
(k) take any action that would, or would reasonably be
expected to, prevent or materially impair or delay the ability
of Portugal to consummate the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement, including the Arrangement and the transactions
contemplated by the Arrangement; or |
|
|
(l) agree or commit to do any of the foregoing. |
6.2. Shareholders
Meeting.
(a) Subject to the terms of this Agreement, Portugal shall
use its reasonable best efforts to cause the Portugal Meeting to
be held as soon as practicable after the date hereof.
(b) Subject to the terms hereof, Portugal shall
(i) promptly after the execution and delivery of this
Agreement, finalize the notice of the Portugal Meeting, the
accompanying proxy statement, and all other documents required
by the Securities Laws or other applicable Laws to be sent to
holders of Portugal Common Shares in connection with the
Portugal Meeting (such documents, as amended, supplemented or
otherwise modified, the Portugal Proxy
Statement), (ii) use its reasonable best efforts
to have the Portugal Proxy Statement cleared by the SEC, and
(iii) as promptly as practicable after such clearance,
cause the Portugal Proxy Statement to be sent to each Portugal
shareholder.
(c) Subject to the terms of this Agreement, Portugal shall
(i) take all lawful action to solicit in favor of the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement the Portugal
Stockholder Approval, (ii) recommend to holders of
Portugal Common Shares that they vote in favor of (A) the
Portugal Share Issuance and (B) the Portugal Charter
Amendment and (iii) not withdraw, modify or qualify (or
publicly propose to or publicly state that it intends to
withdraw, modify or qualify) in any manner adverse to Italy such
recommendation (any such action, a Change in Portugal
Recommendation and, together with a Change in Italy
Recommendation, a Change in Recommendation),
provided, however, that Portugal may (A) make such
Change in Portugal Recommendation if Portugals board of
directors, after consultation with outside legal counsel, has
determined that failure to take such action would be
inconsistent with its fiduciary duties under applicable Law and
(B) upon such a Change in Portugal Recommendation, may
solicit votes of the Portugal stockholders consistent with such
Change in Portugal Recommendation.
6.3. Section 3(a)(10)
Exemption. In the event that the exemption from
registration under Section 3(a)(10) of the 1933 Act is
not available for any reason to exempt the issuance of the
Portugal Common Shares in accordance with the Plan of
Arrangement from the registration requirements of the
1933 Act, then Portugal shall take all necessary action to
file a registration statement on
Form S-4 (or on
such other form that may be available to Portugal) in order to
register such Portugal Common Shares and shall use its
reasonable best efforts to cause such registration statement to
become effective at or prior to the Effective Time.
6.4. Stock Exchange
Listings. Portugal shall use its reasonable best efforts
to obtain the approval of the NYSE for the listing of the
Portugal Common Shares to be issued in connection with the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement, and for the listing
of the Portugal Common Shares on the TSX, such listings to be
effective prior to or as of the time of issuance of such shares
pursuant to the Arrangement.
6.5. Amendment to Governing
Documents of Portugal. Subject to the receipt of the
Portugal Stockholder Approval, Portugal shall take all actions
necessary to cause the certificate of incorporation of Portugal
at the Effective Time to be in the form of Exhibit C hereto.
6.6. Board
Composition. Portugal shall use its reasonable best
efforts to cause the full board of directors of Portugal,
effective immediately following the filing of the Articles of
Arrangement, to consist of (i) 11 individuals who are
currently members of the board of directors of Portugal and
(ii) 4 individuals who are currently members of the
board of directors of Italy or, provided that the France
Condition has been satisfied, and France, the identity of such
individuals to be determined by the Committee on Directors and
Corporate Governance of the Portugal Board of Directors.
6.7. Certain
Officers. The parties hereby agree that (i) the
current Chief Executive Officer of Portugal shall continue to
serve as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Portugal
immediately
A-40
following the filing of the Articles of Arrangement, (ii)
Portugal shall take all actions necessary to cause the current
Chief Executive Officer of Italy to become the Vice-Chairman of
Portugal effective immediately following the filing of the
Articles of Arrangement, and (iii) provided that the
France Condition shall have been satisfied, Portugal shall take
all action necessary to cause the current Chief Executive
Officer of France to become the President-Operations of Portugal
effective immediately following the filing of the Articles of
Arrangement. The foregoing persons shall continue to serve in
the foregoing positions until otherwise provided in accordance
with the Portugal Charter Documents and applicable Laws.
ARTICLE VII
ADDITIONAL AGREEMENTS
7.1. Confidentiality; Access
to Information.
(a) Confidentiality. The parties acknowledge
that Italy and Portugal have previously executed reciprocal
confidentiality agreements, each dated as of June 4, 2006
(the Confidentiality Agreements), which
Confidentiality Agreements will continue in full force and
effect in accordance with their respective terms.
(b) Access to Information. Each of Portugal
and Italy will (and will use reasonable best efforts to cause
each of its Subsidiaries to) afford the other party and its
accountants, counsel and other representatives reasonable access
during normal business hours, upon reasonable notice, to its
properties, books, records, Contracts and personnel during the
period prior to the Effective Time to obtain all information
concerning its business, properties, results of operations and
personnel, as may be reasonably requested. No information or
knowledge obtained by any party in any investigation pursuant to
this Section 7.1(b) will affect or be deemed to modify any
representation or warranty contained herein or the conditions to
the obligations of the parties to consummate the Arrangement.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, either party may restrict the
foregoing access to the extent that any Law (including Laws
relating to the exchange of information and all applicable
antitrust, competition and similar Laws, and attorney-client and
other privileges) applicable to such party requires such party
or its Subsidiaries to restrict or prohibit such access. The
parties will hold any information obtained pursuant to this
Section 7.1(b) in confidence in accordance with, and
otherwise subject to, the provisions of the applicable
Confidentiality Agreement.
7.2. Cooperation in
Filings.
(a) Portugal and Italy shall cooperate in the preparation,
filing and mailing of the Italy Circular and the Portugal Proxy
Statement (collectively, the Shareholder
Solicitations). Each of Portugal and Italy shall, as
promptly as practicable after receipt thereof, provide the other
party copies of any written comments and advise the other party
of any oral comments with respect to its respective Shareholder
Solicitation received from the SEC, the Canadian Securities
Regulatory Authorities or any other Governmental Entity. The
parties shall cooperate and each party shall provide the other
with a reasonable opportunity to review and comment on its
respective Shareholder Solicitation and any amendments or
supplements thereto prior to filing such with the SEC, the
Canadian Securities Regulatory Authorities and/or each other
applicable Government Entity, and will provide each other with a
copy of all such filings made. Each party will advise the other
party, promptly after it receives notice thereof, of the time
when its respective Shareholder Solicitation has been cleared by
the SEC, the Canadian Securities Regulatory Authorities or any
other Governmental Entity, or any request by the SEC, the
Canadian Securities Regulatory Authorities or any other
Governmental Entity for amendment of its respective Shareholder
Solicitation.
(b) Each of Portugal and Italy shall furnish to the other
all such information concerning it and its shareholders as may
be required (and, in the case of its shareholders, available to
it) for the effectuation of the actions described in
Sections 5.2 and 6.2 and the foregoing provisions of this
Section 7.2, and each covenants that the information
furnished by it (or, to its knowledge, with respect to
information concerning
A-41
its shareholders) in connection with such actions or otherwise
in connection with the consummation of the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement in the aggregate will not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact required to be stated in any such document or
necessary in order to make any information so furnished for use
in any such document not misleading in the light of the
circumstances in which it is furnished.
(c) Each of Portugal and Italy shall use its reasonable
best efforts to ensure that its respective Shareholder
Solicitation complies with all applicable Laws in all material
respects and, without limiting the generality of the foregoing,
that the information furnished by it (or, to its knowledge, with
respect to information concerning its shareholders) for
inclusion in the other partys respective Shareholder
Solicitation will not, in the aggregate, contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
required to be stated therein or necessary to make the
statements contained therein not misleading in light of the
circumstances in which they are made (other than with respect to
any information relating to and provided by the other party or
any third party that is not one of its Affiliates).
(d) Each of Portugal and Italy shall promptly notify the
other if, at any time before the Effective Time, it becomes
aware that either Shareholder Solicitation or any application
for an Interim Order or Final Order contains any untrue
statement of a material fact or omits to state a material fact
required to be stated therein or necessary to make the
statements contained therein not misleading in light of the
circumstances in which they are made, or that otherwise requires
an amendment or supplement to such Shareholder Solicitation or
such other document or application. In any such event, each of
Portugal and Italy shall cooperate in the preparation of a
supplement or amendment to such Shareholder Solicitation or such
other document or application, as required and as the case may
be, and, if required, shall cause the same to be distributed to
shareholders of Portugal or Italy, respectively, and/or filed
with the relevant Governmental Entities.
7.3. Public
Announcements. Portugal and Italy shall use reasonable
best efforts (i) to develop a joint communications plan,
(ii) to ensure that all press releases and other public
statements with respect to this Agreement and the transactions
contemplated hereby shall be consistent with such joint
communications plan, and (iii) except where the
circumstances make it impractical or prompt disclosure is
required by applicable law, to consult with each other before
issuing any press release or, to the extent practical, otherwise
making any public statement with respect to this Agreement or
the transactions contemplated hereby. Except in respect of any
announcement required by applicable Law, no party shall issue
any press release or otherwise make any public statement or
disclosure concerning the other party or the other partys
business, financial condition or results of operations without
the consent of such other party, which consent shall not be
unreasonably withheld or delayed.
7.4. Reasonable Best
Efforts.
(a) Upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth
in this Agreement, each of Portugal and Italy agrees to use its
reasonable best efforts to take, or cause to be taken, all
actions, and to do, or cause to be done, and to assist and
cooperate with the other party in doing, all things necessary,
proper or advisable under applicable Laws to consummate and make
effective, in the most expeditious manner practicable, the
Arrangement and the other transactions contemplated by this
Agreement. The parties shall cooperate in all reasonable
respects and will use reasonable best efforts to contest any
action or proceeding and to have vacated, lifted, reversed or
overturned any decree, judgment, injunction or other order,
whether temporary, preliminary or permanent, that prohibits,
prevents or restricts the consummation of the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement.
(b) Upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth
in this Agreement, each of Portugal and Italy shall and shall
use reasonable best efforts to cause its respective Subsidiaries
to perform all obligations required or desirable to be performed
by it or any of such Subsidiaries under this Agreement,
cooperate with the other party in connection therewith, and do
all such other acts and things as may be necessary or desirable
in order to consummate and make effective, as soon as reasonably
practicable, the
A-42
transactions contemplated in this Agreement and, without
limiting the generality of the foregoing, each party shall and
where appropriate shall cause its Subsidiaries to:
|
|
|
(i) use its reasonable best efforts to obtain the requisite
approvals of this Agreement from its shareholders, except to the
extent that the board of directors of such party has effected a
Change in Recommendation in compliance with the terms hereof
(including Sections 5.2 and 6.2); |
|
|
(ii) apply for and use its reasonable best efforts to
promptly obtain all Regulatory Approvals to be obtained by it
and its Subsidiaries and, in doing so, keep the other party
reasonably informed, subject to ensuring that confidential
competitively sensitive information is exchanged among outside
counsel only, as to the status of the proceedings related to
obtaining the Regulatory Approvals, including, but not limited
to, (A) providing such other party with copies of all
material related applications and notifications prepared for
submission to any other Person or Governmental Entity, in draft
form, in order for such other party to provide its reasonable
comments and providing such other party with copies of all
related material communications regarding this Agreement
received by such party from, or given by such party to, any
Governmental Entity and any material communication received or
given in connection with any proceeding by a private party
relating to such Regulatory Approvals, (B) consulting
with the other party to the extent practicable in advance of any
meeting or conference with Governmental Entities or, in
connection with any proceeding by a private party, with any
other Person and, to the extent permitted by such Governmental
Entities, to permit the other party to attend such meetings and
conferences, in each case to the extent relating to the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement and (C)
receiving the prior written consent of the other party before
agreeing to extend any waiting period any antitrust merger
control Laws or entering into any agreement with any
Governmental Entity regarding antitrust, competition or similar
Laws; |
|
|
(iii) use its reasonable best efforts to obtain all
necessary Approvals required to be obtained by it or its
Subsidiaries from third parties in connection with the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement, including the
Arrangement; |
|
|
(iv) carry out the terms of the Interim Order and the Final
Order applicable to it and use its reasonable best efforts to
comply promptly with all requirements which applicable Laws may
impose on it or its Subsidiaries with respect to the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement; and |
|
|
(v) promptly advise the other party orally and, if then
requested, in writing of any event occurring subsequent to the
date of this Agreement that, if uncured at the Effective Time,
would render it incapable of satisfying any condition to be
satisfied by it pursuant to Article VII. |
7.5. Regulatory
Filings. Without limiting the generality of
Section 7.4, as soon as may be reasonably practicable,
Italy and Portugal each shall (i) file with the United
States Federal Trade Commission (the FTC) and
the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of
Justice (DOJ) Notification and Report Forms
relating to the transactions contemplated herein as required by
the HSR Act, (ii) notify the Commissioner as required by
Part IX of the Competition Act and/or request an ARC,
(iii) make all appropriate filings with the European
Commission (European Commission) pursuant to
Council Regulation (EC) 139/2004 of 20 January 2004 or
otherwise, and (iv) file comparable merger notification
forms required by the merger notification or control Laws of any
other applicable jurisdiction as required by Laws or that
Portugal and Italy reasonably determine to be necessary. Italy
and Portugal each shall promptly (a) supply the other
with any information which may be required in order to
effectuate such filings and (b) supply any additional
information which reasonably may be required by the FTC, the
DOJ, the Commissioner, the European Commission, or the
competition or merger control authorities of any other
jurisdiction. As soon as reasonably practicable, Portugal shall
file with the Investment Review Division of Industry Canada
(IRD), an application for review and any
supplemental information (other than privileged information)
which may be required in connection therewith pursuant to the
ICA, which filings will comply in all material respects with the
requirements of the ICA. Italy will provide Portugal with such
information and documents as Portugal reasonably requests for
purposes of preparing such filings.
A-43
7.6. Indemnification.
(a) From and after the Effective Time, Portugal will
fulfill, and will cause Italy and/or its successors to fulfill
and honor in all respects its obligations pursuant to any
indemnification agreements between Italy and the present and
former directors or officers of Italy or any Subsidiary thereof
(the Indemnified Parties) in effect
immediately prior to the Effective Time and any indemnification
provisions under the Italy Charter Documents or applicable Laws,
in each case, as in effect on the date hereof (and shall also
pay expenses in advance of the final disposition of any such
action, suit or proceeding to each Indemnified Party to the
fullest extent permitted under applicable Law, upon receipt from
the Indemnified Party to whom expenses are advanced of the
undertaking to repay such advances if indemnification is
subsequently found by a court of competent jurisdiction, which
finding is no longer subject to appeal or further proceedings,
that such person is not entitled to indemnification). Portugal
shall cause Italy and/or its successors to not amend, repeal or
otherwise modify the provisions with respect to exculpation and
indemnification contained in the Italy Charter Documents as in
effect on the date hereof for a period of six (6) years
from the Effective Time in any manner that would adversely
affect the rights thereunder of individuals who, prior to the
Effective Time, were directors or officers of Italy, unless such
modification is required by Law.
(b) Prior to the Effective Time, Italy shall (or if Italy
is unable to, Portugal shall) obtain and pay for
tail insurance policies with a claims period of at
least six years from and after the Effective Time from an
insurance carrier with the same or better credit rating as
Italys current insurance carrier with respect to
directors and officers liability insurance and
fiduciary liability insurance (collectively,
D&O Insurance) with benefits and levels of
coverage at least as favorable as Italys existing policies
with respect to matters existing or occurring at or prior to the
Effective Time (including in connection with this Agreement or
the transactions or actions contemplated hereby). If Italy or
Portugal for any reason fail to obtain such tail
insurance policies as of the Effective Time, for a period of six
(6) years after the Effective Time, Portugal will, or will
cause Italy and/or its successors to, maintain in effect
directors and officers liability insurance covering
those persons who are currently covered by Italys
directors and officers liability insurance policy
with respect to claims arising from facts or events that
occurred on or before the Effective Time on terms comparable to
those applicable to the current directors and officers of Italy.
(c) This Section 7.6 is intended to be for the benefit
of, and shall be enforceable by, the Indemnified Parties
referred to herein, their heirs and personal representatives.
7.7. Takeover
Statutes. If any fair price,
moratorium, control share acquisition or
other similar anti-takeover statute or regulation (each a
Takeover Statute) is or may become applicable
to the transactions contemplated by this Agreement or the
Arrangement, each of Portugal, Italy and their respective boards
of directors shall grant such approvals and take such actions as
are necessary so that such transactions may be consummated as
promptly as practicable on the terms contemplated by this
Agreement and the Arrangement and otherwise act to eliminate or
minimize the effects of such statute or regulation on such
transactions.
7.8. Section 16(b).
The board of directors of Italy and Portugal shall, prior to the
Effective Time, take all such actions as may be necessary or
appropriate pursuant to
Rule 16b-3(d) and
Rule 16b-3(e)
under the 1934 Act to exempt the exchange of Italy Common
Shares for Portugal Common Shares pursuant to the terms of this
Agreement by officers or directors of Italy who may become an
officer or director of Portugal subject to the reporting
requirements of Section 16(a) of the 1934 Act.
7.9. U.S. Tax
Treatment. Italy and Portugal intend for the acquisition
by Portugal Canada of Italy Common Shares pursuant to this
Agreement to be treated as a qualified stock
purchase for U.S. federal income tax purposes in
respect of which an election under Section 338(g) of the
Code may be made. Italy and Portugal shall take all reasonable
steps to ensure such treatment, including, if necessary,
amending the Plan of Arrangement.
A-44
ARTICLE VIII
CONDITIONS
8.1. Conditions to
Obligations of Each Party to Effect the Arrangement. The
respective obligations of each party to this Agreement to effect
the Arrangement and the other transactions contemplated herein
shall be subject to the satisfaction at or prior to the
Effective Time of the following conditions:
|
|
|
(a) Portugal Stockholder Approval. The
Portugal Stockholder Approval shall have been obtained. |
|
|
(b) Italy Shareholder Approval. The Italy
Shareholder Approval shall have been obtained, in accordance
with any conditions which may be imposed by the Interim Order. |
|
|
(c) Interim Order; Final Order. The Interim
Order and the Final Order shall each have been obtained in form
and terms reasonably satisfactory to each of Portugal and Italy,
and shall not have been set aside or modified in a manner
unacceptable to such parties, acting reasonably, on appeal or
otherwise. |
|
|
(d) No Orders. No Order or Law entered,
enacted, promulgated, enforced or issued by any court or other
Governmental Entity of competent jurisdiction shall be in effect
which restrains or enjoins the consummation of the Arrangement
or makes the Arrangement or the other transactions contemplated
by this Agreement illegal. |
|
|
(e) Regulatory Approvals. |
|
|
|
(i) Portugal shall have obtained the Competition Act
Approval and the ICA Approval; |
|
|
(ii) all applicable waiting periods (and any extensions
thereof) under the HSR Act shall have expired or been
terminated; and |
|
|
(iii) the applicable waiting periods under Council
Regulation (EC) 139/2004 of 20 January 2004 shall have
expired or been terminated. |
|
|
|
(f) Listing of Shares. The Portugal Common
Shares issuable pursuant to the Arrangement shall have been
approved for listing on the NYSE and TSX, subject to notice of
issuance. |
|
|
(g) France. Either (i) Italy shall
have acquired at least two-thirds of the outstanding common
shares of France on the terms set forth in the Support Agreement
and the Italy Bid Circular, without the waiver or change of any
material term or condition thereof except as approved by
Portugal in writing, and shall have completed a France
Subsequent Acquisition Transaction (the France
Condition), or (ii) the Support Agreement has
been terminated in accordance with its terms. Italy will give
Portugal at least 5 days written notice of any
determination to waive any material term or condition of the
Support Agreement and the Italy Bid Circular and Portugal will
inform Italy within such period whether or not Portugal consents
to such waiver. |
|
|
(h) Portugal Charter Amendment.
Portugals certificate of incorporation shall have been
amended and restated in the form attached as Exhibit C,
provided that (i) such amendment and restatement
shall be effectuated only upon satisfaction or waiver of all
other conditions set forth in this Article VIII and
(ii) Portugal shall not be entitled to rely on this
condition precedent to the extent that it is in breach of its
obligations hereunder in respect of the implementation of such
amendment. |
8.2. Additional Conditions to
Obligations of Italy. The obligation of Italy to
consummate and effect the Arrangement shall be subject to the
satisfaction at or prior to the Effective Time of each of the
following conditions, any of which may be waived, in writing,
exclusively by Italy:
|
|
|
(a) Representations and Warranties. The
representations and warranties of Portugal contained in this
Agreement (without giving effect to any materiality (including
the word material) or Material Adverse
Effect qualification) shall be true and correct as of the
Closing Date with the |
A-45
|
|
|
same effect as if made at and as of the Closing Date (other than
such representations that are made as of a specified date, which
shall be true and correct as of such date), except as would not
reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect on Portugal. Italy shall
have received a certificate with respect to the foregoing signed
on behalf of Portugal by an authorized officer of Portugal. |
|
|
(b) Agreements and Covenants. Portugal shall
have performed or complied in all material respects with all
material agreements and covenants required by this Agreement to
be performed or complied with by it on or prior to the Closing
Date, and Italy shall have received a certificate to such effect
signed on behalf of Portugal by an authorized officer of
Portugal. |
|
|
(c) No Material Adverse Effect. Since the
date hereof, there shall not have occurred any fact, event,
change, development, circumstance or effect which, individually
or in the aggregate, has had or would reasonably be expected to
have a Material Adverse Effect on Portugal. |
|
|
(d) Portugal Board of Directors. Portugal
shall have taken all such actions as are necessary to cause the
board of directors of Portugal as of the Effective Time to be
constituted in accordance with Section 6.6. |
8.3. Additional Conditions to
the Obligations of Portugal. The obligations of Portugal
to complete the Arrangement shall be subject to the satisfaction
at or prior to the Effective Time of each of the following
conditions, any of which may be waived, in writing, exclusively
by Portugal:
|
|
|
(a) Representations and Warranties. The
representations and warranties of Italy contained in this
Agreement (without giving effect to any materiality (including
the word material) or Material Adverse
Effect qualification) shall be true and correct as of the
Closing Date with the same effect as if made at and as of the
Closing Date (other than such representations that are made as
of a specified date, which shall be true and correct as of such
date), except as would not reasonably be expected to have,
individually or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect on
Italy; it being understood and agreed that for purposes of
measuring the truth and correctness of the representations and
warranties of Italy as of the Closing Date, if the France
Acquisition has occurred, France, its Subsidiaries and material
joint ventures shall not be considered to be Subsidiaries or
material joint ventures of Italy. Portugal shall have received a
certificate with respect to the foregoing signed on behalf of
Italy by an authorized officer of Italy. |
|
|
(b) Agreements and Covenants. Italy shall
have performed or complied in all material respects with all
material agreements and covenants required by this Agreement to
be performed or complied with by it at or prior to the Closing
Date, and Portugal shall have received a certificate to such
effect signed on behalf of Italy by an authorized officer of
Italy. |
|
|
(c) No Material Adverse Effect. Since the
date hereof, there shall not have occurred any fact, event,
change, development, circumstance or effect which, individually
or in the aggregate, has had or would reasonably be expected to
have a Material Adverse Effect on Italy. |
|
|
(d) Dissent Rights. The holders of no more
than 10% of all of the issued and outstanding Italy Common
Shares shall have exercised their Dissent Rights (and shall not
have lost or withdrawn such rights) in respect of the
Arrangement, provided that in the event that any Person who
holds, directly or indirectly, on the date hereof more than 10%
of the common shares of France exercises Dissent Rights in
respect of the Arrangement in respect of more than 5% of the
Italy Common Shares, the first reference to 10% in this
Section 8.3(d) shall be increased to 15%. |
A-46
ARTICLE IX
TERMINATION, AMENDMENT AND WAIVER
9.1. Termination.
This Agreement may be terminated at any time prior to the
Effective Time, whether before or after the requisite approval
of the shareholders of Italy or Portugal:
|
|
|
(a) by mutual written consent duly authorized by the boards
of directors of each of Portugal and Italy; |
|
|
(b) by either Italy or Portugal, if the Arrangement shall
not have been consummated by March 31, 2007 for any reason
(the Termination Date); provided, however,
that the right to terminate this Agreement under this
Section 9.1(b) shall not be available to any party whose
action or failure to act has been a principal cause of or
resulted in the failure of the Arrangement to occur on or before
such date and such action or failure to act constitutes a breach
of this Agreement; |
|
|
(c) by either Italy or Portugal, if there shall be passed
any Law that makes the consummation of the Arrangement illegal
or otherwise prohibited, or if a Governmental Entity in the
United States or Canada shall have issued an Order or taken any
other action, in any case having the effect of permanently
restraining, enjoining or otherwise prohibiting the Arrangement,
which Order or other action is final and nonappealable; |
|
|
(d) by either Italy or Portugal, if the Italy Shareholder
Approval shall not have been obtained by reason of the failure
to obtain the Italy Shareholder Approval upon a vote taken
thereon at the duly convened Italy Meeting or at any adjournment
or postponement thereof; |
|
|
(e) by either Italy or Portugal, if the Portugal
Stockholder Approval shall not have been obtained by reason of
the failure to obtain the Portugal Stockholder Approval upon a
vote taken thereon at the duly convened Portugal Meeting or any
adjournment or postponement thereof; |
|
|
(f) by Italy, upon a breach of any representation,
warranty, covenant or agreement on the part of Portugal set
forth in this Agreement such that the conditions set forth in
Section 8.2(a) or Section 8.2(b) are incapable of
being satisfied on or before the Termination Date; |
|
|
(g) by Portugal, upon a breach of any representation,
warranty, covenant or agreement on the part of Italy set forth
in this Agreement such that the conditions set forth in
Section 8.3(a) or Section 8.3(b) are incapable of
being satisfied on or before the Termination Date; |
|
|
(h) by Italy or Portugal if the board of directors of
Portugal shall have effected a Change in Portugal Recommendation; |
|
|
(i) by Portugal or Italy if the board of directors of Italy
shall have effected a Change in Italy Recommendation; or |
|
|
(j) by Italy, if Italy proposes to enter into a definitive
agreement with respect to a Superior Proposal in compliance with
the provisions of Section 5.3(f), provided that Italy has
previously or concurrently will have paid to Portugal the Italy
Termination Payment. |
9.2. Notice of Termination;
Effect of Termination. Subject to Sections 9.1(j),
any termination of this Agreement under Section 9.1 above
will be effective immediately upon the delivery of written
notice of the terminating party to the other party hereto. In
the event of the termination of this Agreement as provided in
Section 9.1, this Agreement shall be of no further force or
effect, except that (i) Section 9.2,
Section 9.3 and Article X (General Provisions) shall
survive the termination of this Agreement, and
(ii) nothing herein shall relieve any party from
liability for any intentional or willful breach of this
Agreement. No termination of this Agreement shall affect the
obligations of the parties contained in the Confidentiality
Agreements, all of which obligations shall survive termination
of this Agreement in accordance with their terms.
A-47
9.3. Fees and
Expenses.
(a) General. Except as set forth in this
Section 9.3, all fees and expenses incurred in connection
with this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby
shall be paid by the party incurring such expenses whether or
not the Arrangement is consummated.
(b) Italy Payments.
(i) Italy shall pay to Portugal in immediately available
funds, within one (1) business day after demand by
Portugal, the Italy Termination Fee if this Agreement is
terminated by Portugal or Italy pursuant to Section 9.1(i),
unless: (A) the termination arises as a result of a
Material Adverse Effect in respect of Portugal that has occurred
since the date hereof, and (B) the Italy board of directors
has determined in good faith (after receipt of advice from its
legal and financial advisors) the failure to change the
Boards recommendation, or refusal to reaffirm such
recommendation, would be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties.
(ii) Italy shall pay Portugal in immediately available
funds, within one (1) business day after demand by
Portugal, the Expenses of Portugal if this Agreement is
terminated by Portugal pursuant to Section 9.1(g).
(iii) Italy shall pay Portugal in immediately available
funds, within one (1) business day after demand by
Portugal, the amount of US$125 million, if:
|
|
|
(A) this Agreement is terminated by Portugal or Italy
pursuant to Section 9.1(b) and following the date hereof
and prior to the termination of this Agreement, an Italy
Competing Proposal shall have been publicly announced or
otherwise communicated to the shareholders of Italy, or |
|
|
(B) this Agreement is terminated by Italy or Portugal
pursuant to Section 9.1(d). |
(iv) If any payment becomes due and payable either
(x) pursuant to clause (ii) above in circumstances
where an Italy Competing Proposal was publicly announced or
otherwise communicated to the shareholders of Italy prior to the
termination of this Agreement or (y) pursuant to
clause (iii) above, and within twelve (12) months
following the termination of this Agreement, an Italy Competing
Proposal is consummated, then Italy shall pay to Portugal,
within one (1) business day after demand by Portugal, an
amount equal to the amount by which (A) the Italy
Termination Fee exceeds (B) the amount Italy paid to
Portugal pursuant to clause (ii) or (iii) above.
(v) Italy shall pay to Portugal in immediately available
funds the Italy Termination Fee immediately prior to the
termination of this Agreement by Italy pursuant to
Section 9.1(j).
(vi) In the event that Italy acquires at least two-thirds
of the outstanding common shares of France after the date that
it has become obligated to pay pursuant to the terms hereof the
Italy Termination Fee to Portugal, Italy shall, within one day
of such acquisition, pay to Portugal an additional $450 million,
so that the total amount paid by Italy in respect of the Italy
Termination Fee shall equal $925 million.
(vii) Italy acknowledges that the agreements contained in
this Section 9.3(b) are an integral part of the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement, and that if Italy
fails to pay in a timely manner the amounts due pursuant to this
Section 9.3(b) and, in order to obtain such payment,
Portugal makes a claim that results in a judgment against Italy
for the amounts set forth in this Section 9.3(b), Italy
shall pay to Portugal its reasonable costs and expenses
(including reasonable attorneys fees and expenses) in
connection with such suit, together with interest on the amounts
set forth in this Section 9.3(b) at the prime rate of
Citibank N.A. in effect on the date such payment was required to
be made. Payment of the fees described in this
Section 9.3(b) shall not be in lieu of damages incurred in
the event of intentional or willful breach of this Agreement.
(c) Portugal Payments.
(i) Portugal shall pay to Italy in immediately available
funds, within one (1) business day after demand by Italy,
the Portugal Termination Fee if this Agreement is terminated by
Italy or Portugal
A-48
pursuant to Section 9.1(h) unless: (A) the termination
arises as a result of a Material Adverse Effect in respect of
Italy that has occurred since the date hereof, and (B) the
Portugal board of directors has determined in good faith (after
receipt of advice from its legal and financial advisors) that
the failure to change the Boards recommendation, or
refusal to reaffirm such recommendation, would be inconsistent
with its fiduciary duties.
(ii) Portugal shall pay Italy in immediately available
funds, within one (1) business day after demand by Italy,
the Expenses of Italy if this Agreement is terminated by Italy
pursuant to Section 9.1(f).
(iii) Portugal shall pay Italy in immediately available
funds, within one (1) business day after demand by Italy,
the amount of US$125 million, if:
|
|
|
(A) this Agreement is terminated by Portugal or Italy
pursuant to Section 9.1(b), and following the date hereof
and prior to the termination of this Agreement, a Portugal
Competing Proposal shall have been publicly announced or
otherwise communicated to the shareholders of Portugal, or |
|
|
(B) this Agreement is terminated by Italy or Portugal
pursuant to Section 9.1(e). |
(iv) If any payment becomes due and payable either
(x) pursuant to clause (ii) above in
circumstances where a Portugal Competing Proposal was publicly
announced or otherwise communicated to the shareholders of
Portugal prior to the termination of this Agreement or
(y) pursuant to clause (iii) above, and within
twelve (12) months following the termination of this
Agreement, an Portugal Competing Proposal is consummated, then
Portugal shall pay to Italy, within one (1) business day after
demand by Italy, an amount equal to the amount by which
(A) the Portugal Termination Fee exceeds (B)
the amount Portugal paid to Italy pursuant to
clause (ii) or (iii) above.
(v) Portugal acknowledges that the agreements contained in
this Section 9.3(c) are an integral part of the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement and that if Portugal
fails to pay in a timely manner the amounts due pursuant to this
Section 9.3(c) and, in order to obtain such payment, Italy
makes a claim that results in a judgment against Portugal for
the amounts set forth in this Section 9.3(c), Portugal
shall pay to Italy its reasonable costs and expenses (including
reasonable attorneys fees and expenses) in connection with
such suit, together with interest on the amounts set forth in
this Section 9.3(c) at the prime rate of Citibank N.A. in
effect on the date such payment was required to be made. Payment
of the fees described in this Section 9.3(c) shall not be
in lieu of damages incurred in the event of intentional or
willful breach of this Agreement.
(d) Defined Terms. For purposes of
Sections 9.3(b) and (c), the following terms shall have the
following meanings:
|
|
|
Expenses means all
out-of-pocket fees and
expenses (including all fees and expenses of counsel,
accountants, financial advisors and investment bankers to a
party hereto and its Affiliates), up to $40 million in the
aggregate, incurred by a party or on its behalf in connection
with or related to the authorization, preparation, negotiation,
execution and performance of this Agreement, the preparation,
printing, filing and mailing of its Shareholder Solicitation,
the filing of any required notices under applicable antitrust
Laws or in connection with other Regulatory Approvals, and all
other matters related to the Arrangement (including the Interim
Order and Final Order) and the other transactions contemplated
hereby. |
|
|
Italy Competing Proposal means:
(i) any merger, take-over bid, amalgamation, plan of
arrangement, business combination, consolidation, or similar
transaction in respect of Italy; (ii) any purchase or other
acquisition by a Person (other than Portugal) of such number of
Italys Common Shares or any rights or interests therein or
thereto which together with such Persons other direct or
indirect holdings of Common Shares and the holdings of any other
Person or Persons with whom such first Person may be acting
jointly or in concert constitutes at least a majority of
Italys outstanding Common Shares; (iii) any similar
business combination or transaction, of or involving Italy; or
(iv) any proposal or offer to, or public announcement of an
intention to do, any of the foregoing from any Person other than
Portugal; provided that notwithstanding the foregoing
neither (a) the |
A-49
|
|
|
acquisition by Italy of a third party, whether structured by
means of a merger, amalgamation, consolidation or otherwise, in
which Italy remains as the parent company and the shareholders
of Italy immediately prior to the consummation of such
transaction hold a majority of the outstanding shares of Italy
calculated on a fully diluted basis immediately following such
consummation nor (b) the acquisition by Italy of France as
contemplated by the Support Agreement shall constitute an Italy
Competing Proposal, and provided, further, that
the offer by Teck Cominco in respect of the Italy Common Shares
that was announced on May 8, 2006 shall not be considered
an Italy Competing Proposal unless Teck Cominco amends such
offer to increase or materially improve the consideration
proposed to be paid by Teck Cominco thereunder. |
|
|
Italy Termination Fee means an amount
equal to US$475 million, provided that such amount
shall be US$925 million from and after the date that Italy
has acquired at least two-thirds of the outstanding common
shares of France. |
|
|
Portugal Competing Proposal means:
(i) any merger, take-over bid, amalgamation, plan of
arrangement, business combination, consolidation, or similar
transaction in respect of Portugal; (ii) any purchase or
other acquisition by a Person (other than Italy) of such number
of Portugal Common Shares or any rights or interests therein or
thereto which together with such Persons other direct or
indirect holdings of Portugal Common Shares and the holdings of
any other Person or Persons with whom such first Person may be
acting jointly or in concert constitutes at least a majority of
Portugal Common Shares outstanding; (iii) any similar
business combination or transaction, of or involving Portugal;
or (iv) any proposal or offer to, or public announcement of
an intention to do, any of the foregoing from any Person other
than Italy; provided that notwithstanding the foregoing
the acquisition by Portugal of a third party, whether structured
by means of a merger, amalgamation, consolidation or otherwise,
in which Portugal remains as the parent company and the
shareholders of Portugal immediately prior to the consummation
of such transaction hold a majority of the outstanding shares of
Portugal immediately following such consummation shall not
constitute a Portugal Competing Proposal. |
|
|
Portugal Termination Fee means an
amount equal to US$500 million. |
9.4. Amendment.
Subject to applicable Law and the Interim Order, this Agreement
may be amended, not later than the Effective Time, whether
before or after the Italy Shareholder Approval and the Portugal
Stockholder Approval have been obtained, by action taken or
authorized by the respective boards of directors of the parties
(or, to the extent permitted by Laws, any duly empowered
committee thereof) at any time by execution of an instrument in
writing signed on behalf of each of Portugal and Italy;
provided that after the Portugal Stockholder Approval or
Italy Shareholder Approval is obtained, no such amendment which
requires further approval by the shareholders of Portugal or
Italy, as the case may be, shall be effected without such
further approval.
9.5. Extension;
Waiver. At any time prior to the Effective Time, any
party hereto may, to the extent legally allowed, (i)
extend the time for the performance of any of the obligations or
other acts of the other parties hereto, (ii) waive any
inaccuracies in the representations and warranties made to such
party contained herein or in any document delivered pursuant
hereto and (iii) waive compliance with any of the
agreements or conditions for the benefit of such party contained
herein. Any agreement on the part of a party hereto to any such
extension or waiver shall be valid only if set forth in an
instrument in writing signed on behalf of such party, shall be
limited to its terms and shall not be deemed to extend or waive
any other provision of this Agreement. Delay in exercising any
right under this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of such
right.
A-50
ARTICLE X
GENERAL PROVISIONS
10.1. Non-Survival of
Representations and Warranties. The representations and
warranties of Italy and Portugal contained in this Agreement
shall terminate at the Effective Time, and only the covenants
and agreements that by their terms specifically survive the
Effective Time shall survive the Effective Time.
10.2. Notices. All
notices and other communications hereunder shall be in writing
and shall be deemed given if delivered personally or by
commercial delivery service, or sent via telecopy (receipt
confirmed) to the parties at the following addresses or telecopy
numbers (or at such other address or telecopy numbers for a
party as shall be specified by like notice):
(i) if to Portugal, to:
|
|
|
Phelps Dodge Corporation |
|
One North Central Ave. |
|
Phoenix, AZ 85004 |
|
Attention: David Colton |
|
Telecopy No.: (602) 366-7321 |
|
|
with copies to: |
|
|
Debevoise & Plimpton LLP |
|
919 Third Avenue |
|
New York, N.Y. 10022 |
|
Attention: Michael W. Blair |
|
Gregory
V. Gooding |
|
Telecopy No.: (212) 909-6870 |
|
|
and |
|
|
Heenan Blaikie LLP |
|
P.O. Box 185, Suite 2600 |
|
200 Bay Street |
|
South Tower, Royal Bank Plaza |
|
Toronto, Ontario M5J 2J4 |
|
Attention: Jeff Barnes |
|
Telecopy No.: (416) 360-8425 |
(ii) if to Italy, to:
|
|
|
Inco Limited |
|
145 King Street West |
|
Suite 1500 |
|
Toronto, Ontario M5H 4B7, |
|
Canada |
|
Attention: Simon Fish |
|
Telecopy No.: (416) 361-7781 |
|
|
with copies to: |
|
|
Sullivan & Cromwell LLP |
|
125 Broad Street |
|
New York, New York 10004 |
|
Attention: James C. Morphy |
|
George
J. Sampas |
|
Telecopy No.: 212-558-3588 |
A-51
and
Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
P.O. Box 50
1 First Canadian Place, Suite 6600
Toronto, Ontario
Canada M5X 1B8
|
|
Attention: |
Dale R. Ponder |
Douglas R. Marshall
|
|
|
Telecopy No.: 416-862-6666 |
10.3. Counterparts.
This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts,
which may be delivered by facsimile transmission, all of which
shall be considered one and the same agreement and shall become
effective when one or more counterparts have been signed by each
of the parties and delivered to the other party, it being
understood that all parties need not sign the same counterpart.
10.4. Entire Agreement; Third
Party Beneficiaries. This Agreement and the documents
and instruments and other agreements among the parties hereto as
contemplated by or referred to herein, including the Italy
Disclosure Schedule and the Portugal Disclosure Schedule,
(a) constitute the entire agreement among the parties
with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersede all
prior representations, agreements and understandings, both
written and oral, among the parties with respect to the subject
matter hereof, and neither party is relying on any prior oral or
written representations, agreements, understandings or
undertakings with respect to the subject matter hereof, it being
understood that the Confidentiality Agreements shall continue in
full force and effect and shall survive any termination of this
Agreement; and (b) are not intended to confer upon any
other person any rights or remedies hereunder, except (i)
as specifically provided in Section 7.6 and (ii) the
right of Italys shareholders to receive Portugal Common
Shares and cash at the Effective Time and to recover, solely
through an action brought by Italy, damages from Portugal in the
event of a wrongful termination of this Agreement by Portugal.
10.5. Severability.
In the event that any provision of this Agreement, or the
application thereof, becomes or is declared by a court of
competent jurisdiction to be illegal, void or unenforceable, the
remainder of this Agreement will continue in full force and
effect and the application of such provision to other persons or
circumstances will be interpreted so as reasonably to effect the
intent of the parties hereto. The parties further agree to
replace such void or unenforceable provision of this Agreement
with a valid and enforceable provision that will achieve, to the
extent possible, the economic, business and other purposes of
such void or unenforceable provision.
10.6. Other Remedies;
Specific Performance. Except as otherwise provided
herein, any and all remedies herein expressly conferred upon a
party will be deemed cumulative with and not exclusive of any
other remedy conferred hereby, or by Law or equity upon such
party, and the exercise by a party of any one remedy will not
preclude the exercise of any other remedy. The parties hereto
agree that irreparable damage would occur in the event that any
of the provisions of this Agreement were not performed in
accordance with their specific terms or were otherwise breached.
It is accordingly agreed that the parties shall be entitled to
seek an injunction or injunctions to prevent breaches of this
Agreement and to enforce specifically the terms and provisions
hereof in any court of the United States or any state having
jurisdiction, this being in addition to any other remedy to
which they are entitled at law or in equity. The parties agree
that, notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, in the
event of a willful or intentional breach of this Agreement by
Portugal or any of its Subsidiaries, the damages recoverable by
Italy for itself and on behalf of its shareholders shall be
determined by reference to the total amount that would have been
recoverable by the holders of the Italy Common Shares if all
such holders brought an action against Portugal and were
recognized as intended third party beneficiaries hereunder.
10.7. Governing Law.
This Agreement shall be deemed to be made in and in all respects
shall be interpreted, construed and governed by and in
accordance with, and any disputes arising out of or related to
this Agreement shall be interpreted, construed and governed by
and in accordance with, the laws of the
A-52
State of New York, except to the extent mandatorily governed by
the laws of Canada. Except with respect to the Interim Order or
Final Order or any other matter relating thereto over which the
Court has jurisdiction, the parties hereby irrevocably submit to
the jurisdiction of the courts of the State of New York solely
in respect of the interpretation and enforcement of the
provisions of this Agreement and of the documents referred to in
this Agreement, and in respect of the transactions contemplated
hereby, and hereby waive, and agree not to assert, as a defense
in any Action for the interpretation or enforcement hereof or of
any such document, that it is not subject thereto or that such
Action may not be brought or is not maintainable in said courts
or that the venue thereof may not be appropriate or that this
Agreement or any such document may not be enforced in or by such
courts, and the parties hereto irrevocably agree that all claims
with respect to such Actions shall be heard and determined in
such New York court. The parties hereby consent to and grant any
such court jurisdiction over the person of such parties and over
the subject matter of such dispute and agree that mailing of
process or other papers in connection with any such Action in
the manner provided in Section 10.2 or in such other manner
as may be permitted by Law shall be valid and sufficient service
thereof.
10.8. No Personal
Liability.
(a) No director or officer of Portugal shall have any
personal liability whatsoever to Italy under this Agreement, or
any other document delivered in connection with the Arrangement
on behalf of Portugal.
(b) No director or officer of Italy shall have any personal
liability whatsoever to Portugal under this Agreement, or any
other document delivered in connection with the Arrangement on
behalf of Italy.
10.9. Assignment. No
party may assign either this Agreement or any of its rights,
interests, or obligations hereunder without the prior written
approval of the other parties. Any attempted assignment in
violation hereof shall be null and void. Subject to the
foregoing, this Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure
to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective
successors and permitted assigns.
10.10. WAIVER OF JURY
TRIAL. EACH OF PORTUGAL AND ITALY HEREBY IRREVOCABLY
WAIVES ALL RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY IN ANY ACTION OR COUNTERCLAIM
(WHETHER BASED ON CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE) ARISING OUT OF OR
RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE ACTIONS OF PORTUGAL OR ITALY
IN THE NEGOTIATION, ADMINISTRATION, PERFORMANCE AND ENFORCEMENT
HEREOF.
10.11. Currency.
Unless otherwise specifically indicated, all sums of money
referred to in this Agreement are expressed in U.S. Dollars.
* * * * *
A-53
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this
Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized respective
officers as of the date first written above.
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ J. Steven Whisler |
|
|
|
|
|
Name: J. Steven Whisler |
|
Title: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
INCO LIMITED |
|
|
|
Name: Scott M. Hand |
|
Title: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
A-54
Annex B
FORM OF RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF PHELPS
DODGE
AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
OF
PHELPS DODGE INCO CORPORATION
(Under Section 807 of the
Business Corporation Law)
I,
[ ],
being the
[ ]
of Phelps Dodge Inco Corporation, a corporation formed under the
laws of the State of New York (the Corporation), to
effect the amendment and restatement of the Restated Certificate
of Incorporation of the Corporation, do hereby certify as
follows:
1. The name of the corporation is Phelps Dodge Inco
Corporation (the Corporation).
2. The Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation was
filed by the Department of State of the State of New York on
August 10, 1885. Restated Certificates of Incorporation
were filed by such Department on June 16, 1987 and
July 13, 1999.
3. The Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the
Corporation, as amended to date, is hereby further amended as
authorized by Section 801 of the Business Corporation Law
(a) to change the name of the Corporation, (b) to
increase the authorized capital of the Corporation, (c) to
increase the maximum number of directors of the Corporation from
12 to 15; and (d) to delete as obsolete provision A.2
regarding the 6.75% Series A Mandatory Convertible
Preferred Shares.
4. The text of the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of
the Corporation as amended and supplemented to date, and as
further amended by the filing of this Amended and Restated
Certificate of Incorporation, is hereby amended and restated to
read in full as follows:
* * * * *
FIRST: The name of the Corporation is Phelps Dodge Inco
Corporation.
SECOND: The objects for which this Corporation is formed
are to do any of the things herein set forth to the same extent
as natural born persons might, and in any part of the world and
as principal or agent, to wit: To conduct mining operations of
all kinds; to explore for, develop and deal in, any natural
resources of any kind; to purchase, take, hold, sell, convey,
lease, explore, develop, improve or otherwise deal in mining,
natural resources, land, town site, building, power, water and
other properties of all forms; to mine, extract or otherwise
develop minerals, ores, metals, oil and other substances of all
kinds; to smelt, reduce and otherwise treat minerals, ores,
metals, oil and other substances of all kinds; to sell the
product of all the foregoing operations; to undertake and carry
on any business and operations incidental to such dealings,
exploration, development; mining and treatment.
To apply for, purchase, or otherwise acquire, and to hold, own,
use, operate and to sell, assign or to otherwise dispose of, to
grant licenses in respect to or otherwise turn to account
letters patent and any and all inventions, improvements and
processes used in connection with or secured under letters
patent of the United States or elsewhere, or otherwise.
To build and construct houses, structures, engines, cars,
machinery and other equipment, and mining and metallurgical
facilities and plants, including plants for the handling,
concentrating, smelting, reduction and treatment of minerals,
ores, metals, oil and other substances of all kinds, and to
operate the same.
To conduct manufacturing operations of all kinds; to
manufacture, purchase or otherwise acquire, hold, own, mortgage,
pledge, sell, assign, transfer or otherwise dispose of, invest,
trade and deal in goods, wares and merchandise and property of
all classes and descriptions; to transact a general mercantile
business.
To act as the agent of others in disposing of their minerals,
ores and metals of all kinds or other substances, and to make
contracts with others with reference to handling, smelting,
treating and disposing of their minerals, ores and metals of all
kinds and other substances.
B-1
The Corporation may purchase, acquire, hold and dispose of the
stocks, bonds and other evidences of indebtedness of any
corporation, domestic or foreign, and issue in exchange therefor
its stock, bonds or other obligations.
The Corporation may do everything necessary, suitable and proper
for the accomplishment of any of the purposes or the attainment
of any of the objects or the furtherance of any of the powers
hereinabove set forth, either alone or in association with other
corporations, firms or individuals, and do every other act or
thing incidental or appurtenant to or growing out of or
connected with the aforesaid business or powers, or any part
thereof.
THIRD: The total number of shares that the Corporation
shall have authority to issue shall be eight hundred and six
million (806,000,000), consisting of six million (6,000,000)
Preferred Shares having a par value of one dollar per share and
eight hundred million (800,000,000) Common Shares having a par
value of six dollars and twenty-five cents ($6.25) per share.
The designations, relative rights, preferences and limitations
of each class of shares of the Corporation shall be as follows:
|
|
|
A. The Preferred Shares may be issued from time to time in
one or more series, in such number, and with such distinctive
serial designations and relative rights, preferences and
limitations, as may be fixed by the Board of Directors. Subject
to the limitations set forth herein and any limitations
prescribed by law, the Board of Directors is expressly
authorized, prior to issuance of any series of Preferred Shares,
to fix the number of shares included in such series and the
designation, relative rights, preferences and limitations of
such series and to file a certificate of amendment pursuant to
Section 805 of the Business Corporation Law or any statute
amendatory thereof or supplemental thereto, establishing or
changing the number, designation and relative rights,
preferences and limitations of such series. Pursuant to the
foregoing general authority vested in the Board of Directors,
but not in limitation of the powers conferred on the Board of
Directors thereby and by the laws of the State of New York, the
Board of Directors is expressly authorized to determine with
respect to each series of Preferred Shares: |
|
|
|
(a) the distinctive designation or designations of such
series and the number of shares constituting such series; |
|
|
(b) the rate or amount and times at which, and the
preferences and conditions under which, dividends shall be
payable on shares of such series, the status of such dividends
as cumulative or noncumulative, the date or dates from which
dividends, if cumulative, shall accumulate, and the status of
such shares as participating or non-participating after the
payment of dividends as to which such shares are entitled to any
preference; |
|
|
(c) the rights and preferences, if any, of the holders of
shares of such series upon the liquidation, dissolution or
winding-up of the
affairs of, or upon any distribution of the assets of, the
Corporation, which amount may vary depending upon whether such
liquidation, dissolution or
winding-up is voluntary
or involuntary and, if voluntary, may vary at different dates,
and the status of the shares of such series as participating or
non-participating after the satisfaction of any such rights and
preferences; |
|
|
(d) the full or limited voting rights, if any, to be
provided for shares of such series, in addition to the voting
rights provided by law; |
|
|
(e) the times, terms and conditions, if any, upon which
shares of such series shall be subject to redemption, including
the amount the holders of shares of such series shall be
entitled to receive upon redemption (which amount may vary under
different conditions or at different redemption dates) and the
amount, terms, conditions and manner of operation of any
purchase, retirement or sinking fund to be provided for the
shares of such series; |
|
|
(f) the rights, if any, of holders of shares of such series
to convert such shares into, or to exchange such shares for,
shares of any other class or classes or of any other series of
the same class, the prices or rates of conversion or exchange,
and adjustments thereto, and any other terms and conditions
applicable to such conversion or exchange; |
B-2
|
|
|
(g) the limitations, if any, applicable while such series
is outstanding on the payment of dividends or making of
distributions on, or the acquisition or redemption of, Common
Shares or any other class of share ranking junior, either as to
dividends or upon liquidation, to the shares of such series; |
|
|
(h) the conditions or restrictions, if any, upon the issue
of any additional shares (including additional shares of such
series or any other series or of any other class) ranking on a
parity with or prior to the shares of such series either as to
dividends or upon liquidation; and |
|
|
(i) any other preferences and relative, participating,
optional or other special rights, and the qualifications,
limitations or restrictions thereof, of shares of such series; |
|
|
|
in each case, so far as not inconsistent with the provisions of
this Certificate of Incorporation or the laws of the State of
New York as then in effect. All Preferred Shares shall be
identical and of equal rank except in respect to the particulars
that may be fixed by the Board of Directors as provided above,
and all shares of each series of Preferred Shares shall be
identical and of equal rank except as to the times from which
cumulative dividends, if any, thereon shall be cumulative. The
number of authorized Preferred Shares may be increased or
decreased by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority
of the shares of the Corporation entitled to vote thereon,
without any requirement that such increase or decrease be
approved by a class vote on the part of the holders of the
Preferred Shares or any series thereof, or on the part of any
other class of stock of the Corporation, except as may be
otherwise required by the laws of the State of New York or
provided in the certificate of amendment establishing the voting
rights of any series of Preferred Shares. The Board of Directors
may from time to time amend any of the provisions of any
certificate of amendment establishing any series of Preferred
Shares, subject to any class voting rights of the holders of
such shares and subject to the requirements of the laws of the
State of New York. |
|
|
|
A.1. Junior Participating Cumulative Preferred Shares |
|
|
The number, designation, relative rights, preferences and
limitations of the Junior Participating Cumulative Preferred
Shares are as follows: |
|
|
|
(1) Designation and Number of Shares. 400,000
of the Preferred Shares shall be, and be designated as, Junior
Participating Cumulative Preferred Shares (hereinafter referred
to as the Junior Preferred Shares). |
|
|
(2) Dividends. |
|
|
A. Subject to the provisions of subclauses B and D of this
clause (2), holders of the Junior Preferred Shares shall be
entitled to receive, when, as and if declared by the Board of
Directors out of funds legally available for the purpose,
quarterly dividends payable in cash on the tenth day of March,
June, September and December in each year (each such date, which
is subject to change pursuant to the provisions of subclause D
of this clause (2), being hereinafter referred to as a
Quarterly Dividend Payment Date), commencing on the
first Quarterly Dividend Payment Date after the first issuance
of a Junior Preferred Share, in an amount per share (rounded to
the nearest cent) equal to the greater of (i)
$2.50 per share ($10.00 per annum), and (ii)
subject to the provision for adjustment hereinafter set forth,
100 times the aggregate per share amount of all cash dividends,
and 100 times the aggregate per share amount (payable in kind)
of all non-cash dividends or other distributions, other than a
dividend payable in Common Shares or a subdivision of the
outstanding Common Shares (by reclassification or otherwise),
declared on the Common Shares since the immediately preceding
Quarterly Dividend Payment Date, or, with respect to the first
Quarterly Dividend Payment Date, since the first issuance of any
Junior Preferred Share. In the event the Corporation shall at
any time declare or pay any dividend on Common Shares payable in
Common Shares, or effect a subdivision or combination or
consolidation of the outstanding Common Shares (by
reclassification or otherwise than by payment of a dividend in
Common Shares) into a greater or lesser number of Common Shares,
then the number 100 (or such number to which it may previously
have been adjusted) in subclause (ii) of the preceding
sentence shall be adjusted (or further adjusted) by multiplying |
B-3
|
|
|
such number by a fraction the numerator of which is the number
of Common Shares outstanding immediately after such event and
the denominator of which is the number of Common Shares that
were outstanding immediately prior to such event. |
|
|
B. Holders of the Junior Preferred Shares shall be entitled
to receive such dividends in preference to and in priority over
dividends upon the Common Shares and upon any other shares which
are by their terms junior to the Junior Preferred Shares as to
dividends. Junior Preferred Shares shall be junior as to
dividends to any other Preferred Shares which are by their terms
senior to the Junior Preferred Shares as to dividends, and if at
any time the Corporation has failed to pay accrued dividends on
any such other Preferred Shares at the time outstanding at the
times such dividends are payable, the Corporation shall not
declare or pay any dividends on the Junior Preferred Shares. |
|
|
C. If at any time the Corporation has failed to pay accrued
dividends on any Junior Preferred Shares at the time outstanding
at the times such dividends are payable, the Corporation shall
not |
|
|
|
(i) declare or pay any dividend on the Common Shares or
make any payment on account of, or set apart money for a sinking
or other analogous fund for, the purchase, redemption or other
retirement of any Common Shares or make any distribution in
respect thereof, either directly or indirectly and whether in
cash or property or in obligations or shares of the Corporation
(other than in Common Shares), |
|
|
(ii) purchase any Junior Preferred Shares (except for a
consideration payable in Common Shares), or |
|
|
(iii) permit any corporation or other entity directly or
indirectly controlled by the Corporation to purchase any Common
Shares or Junior Preferred Shares, |
|
|
|
unless, in the case of any such dividend, payment, distribution,
purchase or redemption, all dividends accrued and payable but
unpaid on the Junior Preferred Shares have been or
contemporaneously are declared and paid in full or declared and
a sum sufficient for the payment thereof set aside for such
payment. |
|
|
|
D. The Corporation shall declare a dividend or distribution
on the Junior Preferred Shares as provided in subclause A of
this clause (2) immediately after it declares a dividend or
distribution on the Common Shares (other than a dividend payable
in Common Shares); provided that, in the event no dividend or
distribution shall have been declared on the Common Shares
during the period between any Quarterly Dividend Payment Date
and the next subsequent Quarterly Dividend Payment Date, a
dividend of $2.50 per share ($10.00 per annum) on the
Junior Preferred Shares shall nevertheless be payable on such
subsequent Quarterly Dividend Payment Date. The Board of
Directors may change any of the Quarterly Dividend Payment Dates
to a different date to coincide with the payment date for a
dividend or distribution on the Common Shares. |
|
|
E. Dividends at the $10.00 minimum annual rate shall begin
to accrue and be cumulative on outstanding Junior Preferred
Shares from the Quarterly Dividend Payment Date next preceding
the date of issue of such Junior Preferred Shares, unless the
date of issue of such shares is prior to the record date for the
first Quarterly Dividend Payment Date, in which case dividends
on such shares shall begin to accrue from the date of issue of
such shares, or unless the date of issue is a Quarterly Dividend
Payment Date or is a date after the record date for the
determination of holders of Junior Preferred Shares entitled to
receive a quarterly dividend and before such Quarterly Dividend
Payment Date, in either of which events such dividends shall
begin to accrue and be cumulative from such Quarterly Dividend
Payment Date. Accrued but unpaid dividends shall accumulate but
shall not bear interest. Dividends paid on the shares of Junior
Preferred Shares in an amount less than the total amount of such
dividends at the time accrued and payable on such shares shall
be allocated pro rata on a share-by-share basis among all such
shares at the time outstanding. The Board of Directors may fix a
record date for the |
B-4
|
|
|
determination of holders of Junior Preferred Shares entitled to
receive payment of a dividend or distribution declared thereon,
which record date shall be not more than 50 days prior to
the date fixed for the payment thereof. |
|
|
(3) No Redemption. The Junior Preferred
Shares shall not be redeemable. |
|
|
(4) Liquidation. |
|
|
A. The liquidation price of the Junior Preferred Shares, in
case of the voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or
winding-up of the
Corporation, shall be an amount per share equal to the greater
of (i) $100 and (ii) an aggregate amount (subject
to the provisions for adjustment hereinafter set forth) equal to
100 times the aggregate per share amount to be distributed to
holders of Common Shares. In the event the Corporation shall at
any time declare or pay any dividend on Common Shares payable in
Common Shares, or effect a subdivision or combination or
consolidation of the outstanding Common Shares (by
reclassification or otherwise than by payment of a dividend in
Common Shares) into a greater or lesser number of Common Shares,
then the number 100 (or such number to which it may previously
have been adjusted) in subclause (ii) of the preceding
sentence shall be adjusted (or further adjusted) by multiplying
such number by a fraction the numerator of which is the number
of Common Shares outstanding immediately after such event and
the denominator of which is the number of Common Shares that
were outstanding immediately prior to such event. |
|
|
B. In the event of any voluntary or involuntary
liquidation, dissolution or
winding-up of the
Corporation, the holders of Junior Preferred Shares (i)
shall not be entitled to receive the liquidation price of such
shares held by them until the liquidation price of any other
Preferred Shares which are by their terms senior to the Junior
Preferred Shares as to the distribution of assets on any
voluntary or involuntary liquidation of the Corporation shall
have been paid in full and (ii) shall be entitled to
receive the liquidation price of such shares held by them in
preference to and in priority over any distributions upon the
Common Shares and upon any other shares which are by their terms
junior to the Junior Preferred Shares as to the distribution of
assets on any voluntary or involuntary liquidation of the
Corporation. Upon payment in full of the liquidation price to
which the holders of Junior Preferred Shares are entitled, the
holders of Junior Preferred Shares will not be entitled to any
further participation in any distribution of assets by the
Corporation. If the assets of the Corporation are not sufficient
to pay in full the liquidation price payable to the holders of
Junior Preferred Shares, the holders of all such shares shall
share pro rata on a share-by-share basis among all such shares
at the time outstanding. |
|
|
C. Neither a consolidation or merger of the Corporation
with or into any other corporation, nor a merger of any other
corporation with or into the Corporation, nor a sale or transfer
of all or any part of the Corporations assets for cash or
securities shall be considered a liquidation, dissolution or
winding-up of the
Corporation within the meaning of this clause (4). |
|
|
(5) Convertibility. The Junior Preferred
Shares shall not be convertible into any other securities of the
Corporation. |
|
|
(6) Other Shares. The Junior Preferred Shares
do not restrict in any way the issuance of any additional shares
(including additional Junior Preferred Shares) ranking on a
parity with or prior to the Junior Preferred Shares either as to
dividends or upon liquidation or any additional Common Shares or
other shares that may be entitled to vote with the Junior
Preferred Shares. Any Junior Preferred Shares which are acquired
by the Corporation and subsequently cancelled by the Board of
Directors shall have the status of authorized but unissued
Preferred Shares, without designation as to series, subject to
reissuance by the Board of Directors as Junior Preferred Shares
or of any one or more series. |
|
|
|
(7) Voting Rights. The holders of Junior
Preferred Shares shall have the following voting rights: |
|
|
|
A. Subject to the provisions for adjustment hereinafter set
forth, each Junior Preferred Share shall entitle the holder
thereof to 100 votes on all matters submitted to a vote of |
B-5
|
|
|
shareholders of the Corporation and the holders of Junior
Preferred Shares and the holders of Common Shares shall vote
together as one class on all such matters. In the event the
Corporation shall at any time declare or pay any dividend on
Common Shares payable in Common Shares, or effect a subdivision
or combination or consolidation of the outstanding Common Shares
(by reclassification or otherwise than by payment of a dividend
in Common Shares) into a greater or lesser number of Common
Shares, then the number 100 in the preceding sentence (or such
number to which it may previously have been adjusted) shall be
adjusted (or further adjusted) by multiplying such number by a
fraction the numerator of which is the number of Common Shares
outstanding immediately after such event and the denominator of
which is the number of Common Shares that were outstanding
immediately prior to such event. |
|
|
B. Except as otherwise provided herein or required by law,
the holders of Junior Preferred Shares shall have no voting
rights for taking any corporate action. |
|
|
|
(8) Consolidation, Merger, etc. In case the
Corporation shall enter into any consolidation, merger,
combination or other transaction in which the Common Shares are
exchanged for or changed into other stock or securities, cash
and/or any other property, then in any such case (subject to the
provision for adjustment hereinafter set forth) each Junior
Preferred Share shall at the same time be similarly exchanged
for or changed into 100 times the aggregate per share amount of
stock, securities, cash and/or any other property (payable in
kind), as the case may be, for which or into which each Common
Share is exchanged or changed. In the event the Corporation
shall at any time declare or pay any dividend on Common Shares
payable in Common Shares, or effect a subdivision or combination
or consolidation of the outstanding Common Shares (by
reclassification or otherwise than by payment of a dividend in
Common Shares) into a greater or lesser number of Common Shares,
then the number 100 in the preceding sentence (or such number to
which it may previously have been adjusted) shall be adjusted
(or further adjusted) by multiplying such number by a fraction
the numerator of which is the number of Common Shares
outstanding immediately after such event and the denominator of
which is the number of Common Shares that were outstanding
immediately prior to such event. |
|
|
(9) Definition of Common Shares.
As used in this Paragraph A.1 of this Certificate of
Incorporation, the term Common Shares shall mean the
Common Shares of the Corporation having a par value of six
dollars and twenty-five cents ($6.25) per share, as such shares
may be changed through any subdivision, combination or
consolidation thereof. |
|
|
|
B. Except as otherwise provided by the laws of the State of
New York or by any certificate of amendment filed pursuant to
Paragraph A of this Article THIRD, setting forth the
relative rights, preferences and limitations of any series of
Preferred Shares, the entire voting power of the shares of the
Corporation for the election of Directors and for all other
purposes, as well as all other rights appertaining to shares of
the Corporation, shall be vested exclusively in the Common
Shares. Each Common Share shall have one vote upon all matters
to be voted on by the holders of the Common Shares, and shall be
entitled to participate equally in all dividends payable with
respect to the Common Shares and to share ratably, subject to
the rights and preferences of any such Preferred Shares, in all
assets of the Corporation in the event of any voluntary or
involuntary liquidation, dissolution or
winding-up of the
affairs of the Corporation. |
|
|
C. No present or future holder of any shares of the
Corporation, whether heretofore or hereafter issued, shall have
any preemptive rights with respect to (a) any shares of
the Corporation or (b) any other securities of the
Corporation (including bonds and debentures) convertible into or
carrying rights or options to purchase any shares of the
Corporation. |
B-6
FOURTH: The office of the Corporation shall be located in
the City of New York, County of New York, State of New
York. CT Corporation System, 1633 Broadway, New York, New York
10019, is designated as the registered agent of the Corporation
upon whom process in any action or proceeding against it may be
served. The Secretary of State of the State of New York is also
designated as the agent of the Corporation upon whom process in
any action or proceeding against it may be served. The address
to which the Secretary of State shall mail a copy of process in
any action or proceeding against the Corporation which may be
served upon him is: Phelps Dodge Inco Corporation, c/o CT
Corporation System, 1633 Broadway, New York, New York 10019.
FIFTH: The duration of the Corporation shall be perpetual.
SIXTH: The number of the Corporations Directors
shall not be less than nine nor more than fifteen, provided that
whenever the holders of any one or more series of Preferred
Shares of the Corporation become entitled to elect one or more
Directors to the Board of Directors in accordance with any
applicable provisions of this Certificate of Incorporation, such
maximum number of Directors shall be increased automatically by
the number of Directors such holders are so entitled to elect.
Such increase shall remain in effect until the right of such
holders to elect such Director or Directors shall cease and
until the Director or Directors elected by such holders shall no
longer hold office. No Director may be removed without cause by
shareholders of the Corporation.
SEVENTH: The personal liability of the Directors of the
Corporation for any breach of duty in such capacity is hereby
eliminated and limited to the fullest extent permitted by
Section 402(b) of the New York Business Corporation
Law, as the same may be amended from time to time.
* * * * *
5. The majority of the stockholders of the Corporation, at
meeting duly called, approved said restatement and amendment in
accordance with the applicable provisions of section 803 of
the Business Corporation Law of the State of New York.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this certificate, and affirm
that the statements made herein are true under penalties of
perjury, on this [ ] day of
[ ],
2006.
B-7
Annex C
|
|
|
|
|
Global Banking
633 West Fifth Street, Suite 6300
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Tel 213-833-2300
Fax 213-833-2389 |
July 16, 2006
The Board of Directors
Phelps Dodge Corporation
One North Central Avenue
Phoenix, Arizona 85004-4414
Members of the Board:
You have requested our opinion as to the fairness, from a
financial point of view, to Phelps Dodge Corporation
(Phelps Dodge) of the Combination Consideration (as
defined below) set forth in a Combination Agreement, dated as of
June 25, 2006, between Phelps Dodge and Inco Limited
(Inco), as amended by a Waiver and First Amendment
to the Combination Agreement, dated as of July 16, 2006,
between Phelps Dodge and Inco (as amended, the Combination
Agreement). As more fully described in the Combination
Agreement, (i) a newly-formed Canadian wholly-owned
subsidiary of Phelps Dodge (Phelps Dodge Canada)
will acquire all of the outstanding common shares, no par value,
of Inco (Inco Common Shares), (ii) Inco and
Phelps Dodge Canada will amalgamate (the
Arrangement) and (iii) each outstanding share
of Inco Common Shares (other than (x) Inco Common Shares
held by a holder who has validly exercised its Dissent Rights
(as defined in the Combination Agreement) or by Phelps Dodge or
any subsidiary of Phelps Dodge and (y) the Italy Restricted
Shares (as defined in the Combination Agreement)) will be
exchanged by the holder therefor for (I) 0.672 shares
(the Stock Consideration) of the common stock, par
value $6.25 per share, of Phelps Dodge (Phelps Dodge
Common Shares) plus (II) Cdn.$20.25 in cash (the
Per Share Cash Amount and together with the Stock
Consideration, the Combination Consideration).
In arriving at our opinion, we have considered that Inco has a
pending business combination with Falconbridge Limited
(Falconbridge) pursuant to a Support Agreement (as
defined in the Combination Agreement). We understand that Phelps
Dodges obligations under the Combination Agreement are
subject to a condition (the Falconbridge Condition)
that (x) either (i) Inco shall have acquired at least
50.01% of the outstanding common shares of Falconbridge
calculated on a Fully-Diluted Basis (as defined in the Support
Agreement) on the terms set forth in the Support Agreement and
the Italy Bid Circular (as defined in the Combination
Agreement), without the waiver or change of any material term or
condition thereof except as approved by Phelps Dodge in writing,
or (ii) the Support Agreement shall have been terminated in
accordance with its terms without Inco having acquired any
shares of Falconbridge pursuant to the Italy Bid (as defined in
the Combination Agreement) and (y) in the event that Inco
shall have acquired at least two-thirds of the outstanding
common shares of Falconbridge, Inco shall have completed a
France Subsequent Acquisition Transaction (as defined in the
Combination Agreement). The business combination with Inco and
Falconbridge, pursuant to the consummation of the Offer (as
defined in the Support Agreement) and, subsequent thereto, the
France Subsequent Acquisition Transaction, is referred to herein
as the Falconbridge Business Combination. In
arriving at our opinion, we have also held discussions with
certain senior officers, directors and other representatives and
advisors of Phelps Dodge, certain senior officers and other
representatives and advisors of Inco and certain representatives
and advisors of Falconbridge concerning, as may be applicable,
the businesses, operations and prospects of Phelps Dodge, Inco
and Falconbridge. We examined certain publicly available
business and financial information relating to Phelps Dodge,
Inco and Falconbridge, as well as certain financial
C-1
The Board of Directors
Phelps Dodge Corporation
July 16, 2006
Page 2
forecasts and other information and data relating to Phelps
Dodge, Inco and Falconbridge which were provided to or discussed
with us by the respective managements of Phelps Dodge and Inco,
including information relating to the potential strategic
implications and operational benefits (including the amount,
timing and achievability thereof) anticipated by the managements
of Phelps Dodge, Inco and Falconbridge to result from the
Arrangement and the Arrangement in conjunction with the
Falconbridge Business Combination. These financial projections
included financial projections prepared by the management of
Phelps Dodge assuming the consummation of the Arrangement and
giving effect either to the Falconbridge Business Combination
being consummated or, in the alternative, the termination of the
Support Agreement (the Phelps Dodge Arrangement
Projections). We reviewed the financial terms of the
Arrangement as set forth in the Combination Agreement in
relation to, among other things: current and historical market
prices and trading volumes of Phelps Dodge Common Shares and
Inco Common Shares; the historical and projected earnings and
other operating data of Phelps Dodge and Inco; and the
capitalization and financial condition of Phelps Dodge and Inco.
In our review of the financial terms of the Arrangement as set
forth in the Combination Agreement, we gave effect to the
Falconbridge Business Combination being consummated or, in the
alternative, the termination of the Support Agreement. In that
connection, we reviewed the consummation of the Falconbridge
Business Combination, in conjunction with the Arrangement, in
relation to, among other things, the historical and projected
earnings and other operating data of Falconbridge and the
capitalization and financial condition of Falconbridge. We
considered, to the extent publicly available, the financial
terms of certain other transactions which we considered relevant
in evaluating the Arrangement and analyzed certain financial,
stock market and other publicly available information relating
to the businesses of other companies whose operations we
considered relevant in evaluating those of Phelps Dodge, Inco
and Falconbridge. We also evaluated certain potential pro forma
financial effects of the Arrangement on Phelps Dodge. In
addition to the foregoing, we conducted such other analyses and
examinations and considered such other information and
financial, economic and market criteria as we deemed appropriate
in arriving at our opinion.
In rendering our opinion, we have assumed and relied, without
assuming any responsibility for independent verification, upon
the accuracy and completeness of all financial and other
information and data publicly available or provided to or
otherwise reviewed by or discussed with us and upon the
assurances of the managements of Phelps Dodge and Inco that they
are not aware of any relevant information that has been omitted
or that remains undisclosed to us. With respect to financial
forecasts and other information and data relating to Phelps
Dodge, Inco and Falconbridge provided to or otherwise reviewed
by or discussed with us, we have been advised by the respective
managements of Phelps Dodge and Inco that, as may be applicable,
such forecasts and other information and data were reasonably
prepared on bases reflecting the best currently available
estimates and judgments of the managements of Phelps Dodge, Inco
and Falconbridge as to the future financial performance of
Phelps Dodge, Inco and Falconbridge, the potential strategic
implications and operational benefits anticipated to result from
the Arrangement, and the Arrangement in conjunction with the
Falconbridge Business Combination, and the other matters covered
thereby, and have assumed, with your consent, that the financial
results (including the potential strategic implications and
operational benefits anticipated to result from the Arrangement
and the Arrangement in conjunction with the Falconbridge
Business Combination) reflected in the Phelps Dodge Arrangement
Projections and related information and data will be realized in
the amounts and at the times projected. We have had limited
access to senior officers and other representatives and advisors
of Falconbridge, and, accordingly, with your consent, we have
assumed and relied, without assuming any responsibility for
obtaining information directly from senior officers and other
representatives and advisors of Falconbridge, upon the accuracy
and completeness of information provided by senior officers and
other representatives and advisors of Phelps Dodge and Inco with
respect to the business, operations and prospects of
Falconbridge as well as certain financial forecasts and other
information and data relating to
C-2
The Board of Directors
Phelps Dodge Corporation
July 16, 2006
Page 3
Falconbridge, including information relating to the potential
strategic implications and operational benefits (including the
amount, timing and achievability thereof) anticipated by the
management of Falconbridge to result from the Falconbridge
Business Combination in conjunction with the Arrangement. We
have assumed, with your consent, that the Combination Agreement
and Support Agreement (unless the Support Agreement were
terminated) will each be consummated in accordance with its
terms, without waiver, modification or amendment of any material
term, condition or agreement, including the Falconbridge
Condition. We have also assumed that, in the course of obtaining
the necessary regulatory or third party approvals, consents and
releases for the Arrangement and the Falconbridge Business
Combination, no delay, limitation, restriction or condition will
be imposed that would have an adverse effect on Phelps Dodge,
Inco, Falconbridge or the contemplated benefits of the
Arrangement or the Arrangement in conjunction with Falconbridge
Business Combination. We are not expressing any opinion as to
what the value of the Stock Consideration actually will be when
issued pursuant to the Arrangement or the price at which the
Phelps Dodge Common Shares will trade at any time. We have not
made or been provided with an independent evaluation or
appraisal of the assets or liabilities (contingent or otherwise)
of Phelps Dodge, Inco or Falconbridge nor have we made any
physical inspection of the properties or assets of Phelps Dodge,
Inco or Falconbridge. Our opinion, as set forth herein, is
limited to the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the
Combination Consideration to Phelps Dodge. In that connection,
we express no opinion with respect to the purchase of the
8% Convertible Subordinated Notes due April 1, 2012 of
Inco pursuant to the Convertible Note Purchase Agreement
(attached as an exhibit to the Combination Agreement). We
express no opinion as to the underlying decision by Phelps Dodge
to engage in the Arrangement, and we express no view as to, and
our opinion does not address, the relative merits of the
Arrangement as compared to any alternative business strategies
that might exist for Phelps Dodge or the effect of any other
transaction in which Phelps Dodge might engage. In connection
with the consummation of the Arrangement, we also express no
opinion with respect to the consideration to be paid by Inco
pursuant to the Support Agreement, and we are also expressing no
view on the relative valuation or merits of the consummation of
the Falconbridge Business Combination when compared with the
termination of the Support Agreement. Our opinion is necessarily
based upon information available to us, and financial, stock
market and other conditions and circumstances existing, as of
the date hereof.
Citigroup Global Markets Inc. has acted as financial advisor to
Phelps Dodge in connection with the proposed Arrangement and is
entitled to a fee for such services, substantially all of which
is contingent upon the consummation of the Arrangement. An
affiliate of Citigroup engaged in the commercial lending
business is acting as lender and agent for credit facilities to
be used by Phelps Dodge in connection with the Arrangement. We
and our affiliates in the past have provided, and currently
provide, services to Phelps Dodge, Inco and Falconbridge
unrelated to the proposed Arrangement, for which services we and
such affiliates have received and expect to receive
compensation, including without limitation, acting as
underwriter for Phelps Dodge in its Peruvian bond offering for
Cerro Verde in April 2006, acting as advisor to Phelps Dodge in
its sale of Columbian Chemicals Company in March 2006, acting as
underwriter in Phelps Dodges sale of its investment in
Southern Copper Corporation in June 2005, acting as lead
arranger in Phelps Dodges $1.1 billion revolving
credit facility in May 2005, acting as underwriter in
Incos $45 million trade receivables securitization in
October 2005 and acting as lead arranger in Incos
$750 million revolving credit facility in May 2005. In the
ordinary course of our business, we and our affiliates may
actively trade or hold the securities of Phelps Dodge, Inco and
Falconbridge for our own account or for the account of our
customers and, accordingly, may at any time hold a long or short
position in such securities. In addition, we and our affiliates
(including Citigroup Inc. and its affiliates) may maintain
relationships with Phelps Dodge, Inco, Falconbridge and their
respective affiliates.
C-3
The Board of Directors
Phelps Dodge Corporation
July 16, 2006
Page 4
Our advisory services and the opinion expressed herein are
provided for the information of the Board of Directors of Phelps
Dodge in its evaluation of the proposed Arrangement, and our
opinion is not intended to be and does not constitute a
recommendation to any shareholder as to how such shareholder
should vote or act on any matters relating to the proposed
Arrangement.
Based upon and subject to the foregoing, our experience as
investment bankers, our work as described above and other
factors we deemed relevant, we are of the opinion that, as of
the date hereof, the Combination Consideration is fair, from a
financial point of view, to Phelps Dodge.
Very truly yours,
CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS INC.
C-4
Annex D
July 16, 2006
The Board of Directors
Phelps Dodge Corporation
One North Central Avenue
Phoenix, Arizona 85004-4414
Members of the Board:
You have requested our opinion as to the fairness, from a
financial point of view, to Phelps Dodge Corporation
(Phelps Dodge) of the Combination Consideration (as
defined below) set forth in a Combination Agreement, dated as of
June 25, 2006, between Phelps Dodge and Inco Limited
(Inco), as amended by a Waiver and First Amendment
to the Combination Agreement, dated as of July 16, 2006,
between Phelps Dodge and Inco (as amended, the Combination
Agreement). As more fully described in the Combination
Agreement, (i) a newly-formed Canadian wholly-owned
subsidiary of Phelps Dodge (Phelps Dodge Canada)
will acquire all of the outstanding common shares, no par value,
of Inco (Inco Common Shares), (ii) Inco and
Phelps Dodge Canada will amalgamate (the
Arrangement) and (iii) each outstanding share
of Inco Common Shares (other than (x) Inco Common Shares held by
a holder who has validly exercised its Dissent Rights (as
defined in the Combination Agreement) or by Phelps Dodge or any
subsidiary of Phelps Dodge and (y) the Italy Restricted
Shares (as defined in the Combination Agreement)) will be
exchanged by the holder therefor for (I) 0.672 shares
(the Stock Consideration) of the common stock, par
value $6.25 per share, of Phelps Dodge (Phelps Dodge
Common Shares) plus (II) Cdn.$20.25 in cash (the
Per Share Cash Amount and together with the Stock
Consideration, the Combination Consideration).
In arriving at our opinion, we have considered that Inco has a
pending business combination with Falconbridge Limited
(Falconbridge) pursuant to a Support Agreement (as
defined in the Combination Agreement). We understand that Phelps
Dodges obligations under the Combination Agreement are
subject to a condition (the Falconbridge Condition)
that (x) either (i) Inco shall have acquired at least
50.01% of the outstanding common shares of Falconbridge
calculated on a Fully-Diluted Basis (as defined in the Support
Agreement) on the terms set forth in the Support Agreement and
the Italy Bid Circular (as defined in the Combination
Agreement), without the waiver or change of any material term or
condition thereof except as approved by Phelps Dodge in writing,
or (ii) the Support Agreement shall have been terminated in
accordance with its terms without Inco having acquired any
shares of Falconbridge pursuant to the Italy Bid (as defined in
the Combination Agreement) and (y) in the event that Inco
shall have acquired at least two-thirds of the outstanding
common shares of Falconbridge, Inco shall have completed a
France Subsequent Acquisition Transaction (as defined in the
Combination Agreement). The business combination with Inco and
Falconbridge, pursuant to the consummation of the Offer (as
defined in the Support Agreement) and, subsequent thereto, the
France Subsequent Acquisition Transaction, is referred to herein
as the Falconbridge Business Combination.
HSBC Securities (USA) Inc.
452 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10018
Telephone (212) 525-5000
D-1
The Board of Directors
Phelps Dodge Corporation
July 16, 2006
Page 2
In connection with this opinion, we have:
|
|
|
(i) reviewed certain publicly available financial
statements and other business and financial information relating
to Phelps Dodge, Inco and Falconbridge; |
|
|
(ii) reviewed certain internal financial forecasts and
other information and data relating to Phelps Dodge, Inco and
Falconbridge which were provided to or discussed with us by the
respective managements of Phelps Dodge and Inco, including
information relating to the potential strategic implications and
operational benefits (including the amount, timing and
achievability thereof) anticipated by the managements of Phelps
Dodge, Inco and Falconbridge to result from the Arrangement, and
the Arrangement in conjunction with the Falconbridge Business
Combination, which financial projections included financial
projections prepared by the management of Phelps Dodge assuming
the consummation of the Arrangement and giving effect either to
the Falconbridge Business Combination being consummated or, in
the alternative, the termination of the Support Agreement (the
Phelps Dodge Arrangement Projections); |
|
|
(iii) discussed with certain senior officers, directors and
other representatives and advisors of Phelps Dodge, certain
senior officers and other representatives and advisors of Inco
and certain representatives and advisors of Falconbridge
concerning, as may be applicable, the businesses, financial
condition, operations and prospects of Phelps Dodge, Inco and
Falconbridge; |
|
|
(iv) discussed the strategic rationale for, and potential
benefits of, the Arrangement, and the Arrangement in conjunction
with the Falconbridge Business Combination, with certain senior
officers, directors and other representatives and advisors of
Phelps Dodge and certain senior officers and other
representatives and advisors of Inco; |
|
|
(v) reviewed the financial terms of the Arrangement as set
forth in the Combination Agreement in relation to, among other
things: current and historical market prices and trading volumes
of Phelps Dodge Common Shares and Inco Common Shares; the
historical and projected earnings and other operating data of
Phelps Dodge and Inco; and the capitalization and financial
condition of Phelps Dodge and Inco; |
|
|
(vi) evaluated certain potential pro forma financial
effects of the Arrangement on Phelps Dodge; |
|
|
(vii) considered, to the extent publicly available, the
financial terms of certain other transactions which we
considered relevant in evaluating the Arrangement and analyzed
certain financial, stock market and other publicly available
information relating to the businesses of other companies whose
operations we considered relevant in evaluating those of Phelps
Dodge, Inco and Falconbridge; |
|
|
(viii) participated in discussions and negotiations among
representatives of Phelps Dodge, Inco and their respective
financial and legal advisors; and |
|
|
(ix) reviewed the Combination Agreement, the Support
Agreement and certain related documents. |
In addition to the foregoing, we conducted such other analyses
and examinations and considered such other information and
financial, economic and market criteria as we deemed appropriate
in arriving at our opinion.
In our review of the financial terms of the Arrangement as set
forth in the Combination Agreement, we gave effect to the
Falconbridge Business Combination being consummated or, in the
alternative, the termination of the Support Agreement. In that
connection, we reviewed the consummation of the Falconbridge
Business Combination, in conjunction with the Arrangement, in
relation to, among other
D-2
The Board of Directors
Phelps Dodge Corporation
July 16, 2006
Page 3
things, the historical and projected earnings and other
operating data of Falconbridge and the capitalization and
financial condition of Falconbridge.
In rendering our opinion, we have assumed and relied, without
assuming any responsibility for independent verification, upon
the accuracy and completeness of all financial and other
information and data publicly available or provided to or
otherwise reviewed by or discussed with us and upon the
assurances of the managements of Phelps Dodge and Inco that they
are not aware of any relevant information that has been omitted
or that remains undisclosed to us. With respect to financial
forecasts and other information and data relating to Phelps
Dodge, Inco and Falconbridge provided to or otherwise reviewed
by or discussed with us, we have been advised by the respective
managements of Phelps Dodge and Inco that, as may be applicable,
such forecasts and other information and data were reasonably
prepared on bases reflecting the best currently available
estimates and judgments of the managements of Phelps Dodge, Inco
and Falconbridge as to the future financial performance of
Phelps Dodge, Inco and Falconbridge, the potential strategic
implications and operational benefits anticipated to result from
the Arrangement, and the Arrangement in conjunction with the
Falconbridge Business Combination, and the other matters covered
thereby, and have assumed, with your consent, that the financial
results (including the potential strategic implications and
operational benefits anticipated to result from the Arrangement
and the Arrangement in conjunction with the Falconbridge
Business Combination) reflected in the Phelps Dodge Arrangement
Projections and related information and data will be realized in
the amounts and at the times projected. We have had limited
access to senior officers and other representatives and advisors
of Falconbridge, and, accordingly, with your consent, we have
assumed and relied, without assuming any responsibility for
obtaining information directly from senior officers and other
representatives and advisors of Falconbridge, upon the accuracy
and completeness of information provided by senior officers and
other representatives and advisors of Phelps Dodge and Inco with
respect to the business, operations and prospects of
Falconbridge, as well as certain financial forecasts and other
information and data relating to Falconbridge, including
information relating to the potential strategic implications and
operational benefits (including the amount, timing and
achievability thereof) anticipated by the management of
Falconbridge to result from the Falconbridge Business
Combination in conjunction with the Arrangement. We have
assumed, with your consent, that the Combination Agreement and
Support Agreement (unless the Support Agreement were terminated)
will each be consummated in accordance with its terms, without
waiver, modification or amendment of any material term,
condition or agreement, including the Falconbridge Condition. We
have also assumed that, in the course of obtaining the necessary
regulatory or third party approvals, consents and releases for
the Arrangement and the Falconbridge Business Combination, no
delay, limitation, restriction or condition will be imposed that
would have an adverse effect on Phelps Dodge, Inco, Falconbridge
or the contemplated benefits of the Arrangement or the
Arrangement in conjunction with the Falconbridge Business
Combination.
We are not expressing any opinion as to what the value of the
Stock Consideration actually will be when issued pursuant to the
Arrangement or the price at which the Phelps Dodge Common Shares
will trade at any time. We have not made or been provided with
an independent evaluation or appraisal of the assets or
liabilities (contingent or otherwise) of Phelps Dodge, Inco or
Falconbridge nor have we made any physical inspection of the
properties or assets of Phelps Dodge, Inco or Falconbridge. We
are not legal, regulatory, accounting or tax experts and we have
assumed the accuracy and veracity of all assessments made by
such advisors. Our opinion, as set forth herein, is limited to
the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the Combination
Consideration to Phelps Dodge. In that connection, we express no
opinion with respect to the purchase of the 8% Convertible
Subordinated Notes due April 1, 2012 of Inco pursuant to
the Convertible Note Purchase Agreement (attached as an exhibit
to the Combination Agreement). We express no opinion as to the
underlying decision by Phelps Dodge to engage in the
Arrangement, and we express no view as to, and our opinion does
not address, the relative merits of the
D-3
The Board of Directors
Phelps Dodge Corporation
July 16, 2006
Page 4
Arrangement as compared to any alternative business strategies
that might exist for Phelps Dodge or the effect of any other
transaction in which Phelps Dodge might engage. In connection
with the consummation of the Arrangement, we also express no
opinion with respect to the consideration to be paid by Inco
pursuant to the Support Agreement, and we are also expressing no
view on the relative valuation or merits of the consummation of
the Falconbridge Business Combination when compared with the
termination of the Support Agreement. Our opinion is necessarily
based upon information available to us, and financial, stock
market and other conditions and circumstances existing, as of
the date hereof.
HSBC Securities (USA) Inc. (HSBC) has acted as a
financial advisor to Phelps Dodge in connection with the
proposed Arrangement and is entitled to a fee for such services,
substantially all of which is contingent upon the consummation
of the Arrangement, and Phelps Dodge has agreed to reimburse our
expenses and to indemnify us against certain liabilities arising
out of our engagement. An affiliate of HSBC engaged in the
commercial lending business is acting as lender and agent for
credit facilities to be used by Phelps Dodge in connection with
the Arrangement. We and our affiliates in the past have
provided, and currently provide, services to Phelps Dodge, Inco
and Falconbridge unrelated to the proposed Arrangement, for
which services we and such affiliates have received and expect
to receive compensation, including without limitation, acting as
a participant in the $2,900 million term loan portion of
the $5,500 million revolving credit facility to Inco to
fund the acquisition of Falconbridge pursuant to the Support
Agreement, acting as a lender to Inco in a $750 million
revolving credit facility and a $400 million term loan,
each established in 2004, acting as a member of the Girardin
structured tax syndicate facility for Incos Goro Project
in New Caledonia in 2005 and acting as a lender to Falconbridge
under a $60 million bilateral revolving credit facility in
2005. We also maintain other trading, overdraft and interest
rate swap facilities for each of Inco, Falconbridge and their
respective affiliates. In connection with the above-described
services we have received, and may receive, compensation. HSBC
is a part of the global HSBC Holdings plc group, a full-service
banking and securities firm engaged in securities trading,
investment management and brokerage activities, as well as
providing investment banking, financing and financial advisory
services. In the ordinary course of our business, we and our
affiliates may actively trade or hold the debt and equity
securities (or related derivative securities) of Phelps Dodge,
Inco and Falconbridge for our own account or for the account of
our customers and, accordingly, may at any time hold a long or
short position in such securities. In addition, we and our
affiliates may maintain relationships with Phelps Dodge, Inco,
Falconbridge and their respective affiliates.
Our advisory services and the opinion expressed herein are
provided for the information of the Board of Directors of Phelps
Dodge in its evaluation of the proposed Arrangement, and our
opinion is not intended to be and does not constitute any
opinion or recommendation to any shareholder as to how such
shareholder should vote or act on any matters relating to the
proposed Arrangement.
D-4
The Board of Directors
Phelps Dodge Corporation
July 16, 2006
Page 5
Based upon and subject to the foregoing, our experience as
investment bankers, our work as described above and other
factors we deemed relevant, we are of the opinion that, as of
the date hereof, the Combination Consideration to be paid
pursuant to the Combination Agreement is fair, from a financial
point of view, to Phelps Dodge.
|
|
|
Very truly yours, |
|
|
|
|
|
HSBC SECURITIES (USA) INC. |
D-5
Annex E
WAIVER AND AMENDMENT TO COMBINATION AGREEMENT
This WAIVER and FIRST AMENDMENT TO COMBINATION AGREEMENT (this
Waiver and Amendment) is made and entered
into as of July 16, 2006, between Phelps Dodge Corporation,
a New York corporation (Portugal), and Inco
Limited, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of
Canada (Italy).
RECITALS
A. Portugal and Italy are party to a Combination Agreement,
dated as of June 25, 2006 (as amended pursuant hereto, the
Combination Agreement), providing, among
other things, for an Arrangement pursuant to which an indirect
wholly-owned subsidiary of Portugal will acquire all of the
outstanding common shares of Italy and the shareholders of Italy
immediately prior to the effectiveness of the Arrangement will
receive the consideration described in the Combination Agreement
herein and in the Plan of Arrangement referred to therein.
B. Italy wishes to make certain modifications to the Italy
Bid, including to increase the amount of the Offer and to reduce
the Minimum Tender Condition (as such terms are defined in the
Support Agreement), and to make certain modifications to the
Support Agreement, including to provide for the payment of a
special dividend by France to shareholders of France prior to
the initial closing of the Italy Bid, and Portugal wishes Italy
to make such modifications, to consent to such modifications and
to grant certain irrevocable waivers of Italys obligations
under the Combination Agreement in order for Inco to make such
modifications, all as further provided herein.
C. Portugal and Italy wish to amend the terms of the
Arrangement to provide for an increase in the Per Share Cash
Amount.
D. Italy may desire to (i) acquire common shares of
France prior to the Expiry Time (as defined in the Support
Agreement) pursuant to subsection 94(3) of the Securities
Act (Ontario), Ontario Securities Commission Rule 62-501
and all other applicable laws (the Open Market
Purchases) and/or (ii) acquire common shares of
France after the Expiry Time, subject to compliance with
subsection 94(6) of the Securities Act (Ontario) and all
other applicable laws (the Subsequent
Purchases) and Portugal desires to authorize Italy to
make the Open Market Purchases and/or the Subsequent Purchases.
E. Portugal and Italy wish to make certain conforming
modifications to the Combination Agreement as further set forth
herein.
F. All capitalized terms used herein without being
specifically defined are used as defined in the Combination
Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and promises
set forth herein, and for other good and valuable consideration,
the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged,
the parties agree as follows:
ARTICLE I
Waiver and Covenant
1.1. Waivers.
Portugal hereby consents to and irrevocably grants such waivers
as may be required under the Combination Agreement in order to
allow Italy to:
|
|
|
(a) modify the Italy Bid in order to increase the Offer (as
defined in the Support Agreement) by Cdn. $1.00 in cash,
after taking into account the France Special Dividend (as
defined below), and |
E-1
|
|
|
to make such conforming changes as are necessary to reflect such
increase (the Italy Offer Increase); |
|
|
(b) modify the Italy Bid in order to reduce the Minimum
Tender Condition (as defined in the Support Agreement) from
662/3%
to 50.01%, calculated on a Fully-Diluted Basis (as defined in
the Support Agreement) (the Minimum Tender Condition
Reduction); |
|
|
(c) amend the Support Agreement, in the form previously
provided to Portugal, including to provide for the payment of a
dividend by France in the amount of Cdn. $0.75 in cash to
all France shareholders as of a record date not later than
July 26, 2006 (the France Special
Dividend); |
|
|
(d) make the Open Market Purchases and/or the Subsequent
Purchases; and |
|
|
(e) enter into such consents or amendments with its lenders
and prospective lenders as are appropriate to reflect the Italy
Offer Increase, the Minimum Tender Condition Reduction, the Open
Market Purchases and/or the Subsequent Purchases, and the France
Special Dividend. |
1.2. Covenant. Italy
agrees promptly to amend the Italy Bid to reflect the Italy
Offer Increase, the Minimum Tender Condition Reduction and the
France Special Dividend.
ARTICLE II
Amendment of Combination Agreement
Portugal and Italy hereby amend the Combination Agreement as
follows:
|
|
|
2.1. Per Share Cash
Amount. The Combination Agreement is hereby amended to
increase the Per Share Cash Amount, as defined in
clause (ii) of Section 2.1(a), from Cdn. $17.50
in cash to Cdn. $20.25 in cash. The parties will make such
changes to the Plan of Arrangement as are necessary to reflect
such increase in the Per Share Cash Amount. |
|
|
2.2. Section 5.6.
Section 5.6 of the Combination Agreement is hereby amended
by deleting the first sentence of that section and replacing it
with the following sentence: |
|
|
|
At the request of Portugal, in the event that Italy
acquires control of France, Italy shall cause France to use its
reasonable best efforts to (i) redeem the outstanding
France preferred shares Series F and 1 and the outstanding
France convertible debentures in accordance with their
respective terms, (ii) call a meeting of the holders of
outstanding France preferred shares, Series G, H and 3 to
approve amendments to the terms of such preferred shares to
provide for the redemption of such preferred shares on such
terms and conditions as are reasonably acceptable to Portugal
and Italy, and (iii) redeem the France preferred shares,
Series 2 following the Effective Time. |
|
|
|
2.3. Section 6.2.
Section 6.2 of the Combination Agreement is hereby amended
to add a new paragraph (d) to the end thereof as
follows: |
|
|
|
(d) Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary,
in the event that Italy has acquired at least 50.01%, but less
than two-thirds, of the outstanding common shares of France
calculated on a Fully-Diluted Basis (as defined in the Support
Agreement), Portugal may with the prior written consent of
Italy, such consent not to be unreasonably withheld, postpone
the mailing of the Portugal Proxy Statement (and the date of the
Portugal Meeting) until such time as Italy has acquired at least
two-thirds of the outstanding common shares of France. |
|
|
|
2.4. Section 8.1.
Section 8.1 of the Combination Agreement is hereby amended
to delete paragraph (g) thereof in its entirety. |
|
|
2.5. Subsection 8.3(a).
Subsection 8.3(a) of the Combination Agreement is hereby
amended be deleting the words the France Acquisition has
occurred and replacing them with the words |
E-2
|
|
|
Italy has acquired at least 50.01% of the outstanding
common shares of France calculated on a Fully-Diluted Basis (as
defined in the Support Agreement). |
|
|
2.6. Section 8.3.
Section 8.3 of the Combination Agreement is hereby amended
to add a new paragraph (e) to the end thereof as
follows: |
|
|
|
(e) France. Either (i) Italy shall have
acquired at least 50.01% of the outstanding common shares of
France calculated on a Fully-Diluted Basis (as defined in the
Support Agreement) on the terms set forth in the Support
Agreement and the Italy Bid Circular, without the waiver or
change of any material term or condition thereof except as
approved by Portugal in writing, or (ii) the Support
Agreement shall have been terminated in accordance with its
terms without Italy having acquired any shares of France
pursuant to the Italy Bid. In the event that Italy shall have
acquired at least two-thirds of the outstanding common shares of
France, Italy shall have completed a France Subsequent
Acquisition Transaction (the France
Condition). Italy will give Portugal at least
5 days written notice of any determination to waive any
material term or condition of the Support Agreement and the
Italy Bid Circular and Portugal will inform Italy within such
period whether or not Portugal consents to such waiver. |
|
|
|
2.7. Section 9.3.
Section 9.3 of the Combination Agreement is hereby amended
as follows: |
|
|
|
(a) The reference to two-thirds in
paragraph (vi) of Section 9.3(b) is deleted and
replaced with 50.01%. |
|
|
(b) The reference to two-thirds in the
definition of Italy Termination Fee in Section 9.3(d) is
deleted and replaced with 50.01%. |
ARTICLE III
General Provisions
3.1. Counterparts.
This Waiver and Amendment may be executed in one or more
counterparts, which may be delivered by facsimile transmission,
all of which shall be considered one and the same agreement and
shall become effective when one or more counterparts have been
signed by each of the parties and delivered to the other party,
it being understood that all parties need not sign the same
counterpart.
3.2. Governing Law.
This Waiver and Amendment shall be deemed to be made in and in
all respects shall be interpreted, construed and governed by and
in accordance with, and any disputes arising out of or related
to this Waiver and Amendment shall be interpreted, construed and
governed by and in accordance with, the laws of the State of New
York, except to the extent mandatorily governed by the laws of
Canada. Except with respect to the Interim Order or Final Order
or any other matter relating thereto over which the Court has
jurisdiction, the parties hereby irrevocably submit to the
jurisdiction of the courts of the State of New York solely in
respect of the interpretation and enforcement of the provisions
of this Waiver and Amendment and of the documents referred to
herein, and in respect of the transactions contemplated hereby,
and hereby waive, and agree not to assert, as a defense in any
Action for the interpretation or enforcement hereof or of any
such document, that it is not subject thereto or that such
Action may not be brought or is not maintainable in said courts
or that the venue thereof may not be appropriate or that this
Waiver and Amendment or any such document may not be enforced in
or by such courts, and the parties hereto irrevocably agree that
all claims with respect to such Actions shall be heard and
determined in such New York court. The parties hereby consent to
and grant any such court jurisdiction over the person of such
parties and over the subject matter of such dispute and agree
that mailing of process or other papers in connection with any
such Action in the manner provided in Section 10.2 of the
Combination Agreement or in such other manner as may be
permitted by Law shall be valid and sufficient service thereof.
3.3. Continued
Effectiveness. The Combination Agreement as modified by
this Waiver and Amendment is and shall continue to be in full
force and effect and is hereby in all respects ratified and
E-3
confirmed. This Waiver and Amendment shall be effective only in
the specific instances and for the specific purposes for which
given.
* * * *
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Waiver
and Amendment to be executed by their duly authorized respective
officers as of the date first written above.
|
|
|
|
Name: |
Ramiro G. Peru |
|
Title: |
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
Name: |
Simon A. Fish |
|
Title: |
Executive Vice President,
General Counsel and Secretary |
E-4
IMPORTANT VOTING INFORMATION
Your vote is important. Regardless of the number of
shares of Phelps Dodge common stock that you own, please sign,
date and promptly mail the enclosed proxy card in the
accompanying postage-paid envelope. Should you prefer, you may
exercise a proxy by telephone or via the Internet. Please refer
to the instructions on your proxy card which accompanied this
proxy statement.
Instructions for Street Name
Shareholders
If you own shares of Phelps Dodge common stock in the name of a
broker, bank or other nominee, only it can vote your shares of
Phelps Dodge common stock on your behalf and only upon receipt
of your instructions. You should sign, date and promptly mail
your proxy card, or voting instruction form, when you receive it
from your broker, bank or nominee. Please do so for each
separate account you maintain.
Your broker, bank or nominee also may provide for telephone or
Internet voting. Please refer to the proxy card, or voting
instruction form, which you received with this proxy statement.
Please vote by proxy or telephone or via Internet at your
earliest convenience.
If you have any questions or need assistance in voting your
shares of Phelps Dodge common stock, please call:
D.F. King & Co., Inc.
48 Wall Street
New York, New York 10005
Toll Free 1-800-659-5550 (U.S. & Canada)
+44 20 7920 9700 (outside of the U.S. and Canada)
|
|
|
|
|
Phelps Dodge Corporation
c/o Corporate Election Services
P. O. Box 3230
Pittsburgh, PA 15230 |
|
Vote by Telephone
Have your proxy card available when
you call Toll-Free 1-888-693-8683 using a
touch-tone phone and follow the simple
instructions to record your vote.
Vote by Internet
Have your proxy card available when
you access the website www.cesvote.com and
follow the simple instructions to record
your vote.
Vote by Mail
Please mark, sign and date your proxy
card and return it in the postage-paid
envelope provided or return it to: Phelps
Dodge Corporation, c/o Corporate Election
Services, P.O. Box 3230, Pittsburgh PA
15230-3230.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vote by Telephone
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vote by Internet
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vote by Mail |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Call Toll-Free using a
|
|
|
|
|
|
Access the Website and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sign and return your proxy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
touch-tone telephone:
|
|
|
|
|
|
cast your vote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
in the postage-paid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1-888-693-8683
|
|
|
|
|
|
www.cesvote.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
envelope provided. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vote by Internet or Telephone or Mail
24 Hours a Day, 7 Days a Week
Internet and telephone voting are available through 11:59 PM EDT the day prior to special meeting day.
Your telephone or Internet vote authorizes the named proxies to vote your shares in the same manner as if you marked, signed and mailed your proxy card. If you vote your proxy by Internet or by telephone, you do NOT need to mail back your proxy card.
Ø
Proxy card must be signed and dated below.
â Please fold and detach card at perforation before mailing. â
|
|
|
Phelps Dodge Corporation
|
|
Proxy |
The proxies are instructed to vote as directed, and in their discretion on all other matters.
Where no direction is specified, this proxy will be voted
FOR Proposals 1, 2, 3 and 4 as recommended
by the Board of Directors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Board of Directors unanimously
recommends you vote FOR PROPOSALS 1, 2, 3 and 4. |
|
|
|
FOR |
|
|
|
AGAINST |
|
|
|
ABSTAIN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROPOSAL 1: Approve the amendment to and restatement of Phelps Dodges restated certificate of incorporation
to (i) change the companys name to Phelps Dodge Inco Corporation from Phelps Dodge Corporation, (ii) increase
the number of authorized shares of Phelps Dodge common stock from 300 million to 800 million shares and (iii)
increase the maximum number of members of Phelps Dodges board of directors from 12 to 15.
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
|
|
o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROPOSAL 2: Approve the issuance of Phelps Dodge common stock, par value $6.25 per share.
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
|
|
o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROPOSAL 3: Approve the postponement or adjournment of the special meeting to a later date or dates, if
necessary, to permit further solicitation of proxies if there are not sufficient votes at the time of the special meeting
to approve the charter amendment proposal.
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
|
|
o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROPOSAL
4: Approve the postponement or adjournment of the special meeting
to a later date or dates, if necessary, to permit further
solicitation of proxies if there are not sufficient votes at the time
of the special meeting to approve the share issuance proposal.
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
|
|
o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o |
|
Please mark this box if you plan to attend the Special Meeting. |
NOTE: Please sign name exactly as it appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When
signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such.
A corporation should sign in its full corporate name by a duly authorized officer, stating such
officers title. A partnership should sign in the partnership name by an authorized person, stating
such persons title and relationship to the partnership.
PHELPS DODGE CORPORATION
VOTE YOUR SHARES VIA THE INTERNET OR BY TELEPHONE
Dear Shareholder:
Your vote is important and Phelps Dodge Corporation encourages you to submit your proxy
electronically via the Internet or by telephone, both of which are available 24 hours a day, seven
days a week. If you vote your proxy by Internet or by telephone, you do NOT need to mail back your
proxy card.
|
|
|
To submit your proxy electronically via the Internet, go to the Website:
http://www.cesvote.com and follow the prompts. You must use the control number printed in
the box by the arrow on the reverse side of this card. |
|
|
|
|
To submit your proxy by telephone, use a touch-tone telephone and call
1-888-693-8683. You must use the control number printed in the box by the arrow on the
reverse side of this card. |
Also, you may view the Proxy Statement on the Internet at http://www.phelpsdodge.com.
If you have any questions or need assistance in voting, please call D. F. King & Co., Inc.
toll-free at 1-800-659-5550. Shareholders calling from outside the U.S. and Canada may call +44 20
7920 9700.
Your vote is important. Thank you for voting.
Proxy card must be signed and dated on the reverse side.
â Please fold and detach card at perforation before mailing. â
|
|
|
|
|
PROXY
|
|
|
|
|
Solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors of Phelps Dodge Corporation
The undersigned shareholder of PHELPS DODGE CORPORATION hereby appoints Timothy R.
Snider, Ramiro G. Peru and S. David Colton, each or any of them, proxies of the undersigned, each
with power of substitution, at the special meeting of shareholders of the Corporation to be held at
the Heard Museum, 2301 North Central Avenue, Phoenix, Arizona, on the
25th day
of September 2006
at 9:00 a.m., MST and at any adjournments thereof, to vote all Common Shares of the
Corporation held or owned by the undersigned, including any which may be held for the undersigneds
account under the Phelps Dodge Corporation Common Stock Investor Services Program administered by
Mellon Investor Services LLC.
For those participants who hold accounts with Common Shares through the Phelps Dodge Employee
Savings Plan and/or The Phelps Dodge Corporation Supplemental Savings Plan: the undersigned
instructs J.P. Morgan Chase Bank as Trustee for the Plans, to vote all shares or fractions of
shares credited to the account of the undersigned as of the latest available processing date on or before
September 25, 2006,
as directed on the reverse side of this proxy. Those shares for which no directions are
received will be voted by the Trustee in its sole discretion.
THIS PROXY IS CONTINUED ON THE REVERSE SIDE
PLEASE SIGN ON THE REVERSE SIDE AND MAIL PROMPTLY