20-F
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
April 28, 2009
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 20-F
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended:
December 31, 2008
Commission file number:
001-15030
COMPANHIA VALE DO RIO
DOCE
(Exact name of Registrant as
specified in its charter)
Federative Republic of Brazil
(Jurisdiction of incorporation
or organization)
Fabio de Oliveira Barbosa, Chief Financial Officer
fax: +55 21 3814 8820
Avenida Graça Aranha, No. 26
20030-900 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
(Address of principal executive
offices)
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section
12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
|
|
Name of Each Exchange on
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
Which Registered
|
|
Preferred class A shares of Vale, no par value per share
|
|
New York Stock Exchange*
|
American Depositary Shares (evidenced by American Depositary
Receipts),
each representing one preferred class A share of Vale
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
Common shares of Vale, no par value per share
|
|
New York Stock Exchange*
|
American Depositary Shares (evidenced by American Depositary
Receipts), each representing one common share of Vale
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
6.875% Guaranteed Notes due 2036, issued by Vale Overseas
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
8.250% Guaranteed Notes due 2034, issued by Vale Overseas
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
6.250% Guaranteed Notes due 2017, issued by Vale Overseas
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
6.250% Guaranteed Notes due 2016, issued by Vale Overseas
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
5.50% Guaranteed Notes due 2010, series RIO P, issued by
Vale Capital
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
5.50% Guaranteed Notes due 2010, series RIO, issued by Vale
Capital
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Shares are not listed for trading,
but only in connection with the registration of American
Depositary Shares pursuant to the requirements of the New York
Stock Exchange.
|
Securities
registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of
the Act: None
Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to
Section 15(d) of the Act: None
The number of outstanding shares of each class of stock of Vale
as of December 31, 2008 was:
3,181,786,583
common shares, no par value per share
2,031,725,314 preferred class A shares, no par value per
share
12
golden shares, no par value per share
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act.
Yes
þ No
o
If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by
check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports
pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934.
Yes
o No
þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject
to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes
þ No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated
filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large
accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large
accelerated filer
þ Accelerated
filer
o Non-accelerated
filer
o
Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant
has used to prepare the financial statements included in this
filing:
U.S. GAAP
þ International
Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International
Accounting Standards Board
o Other
o
If Other has been checked in response to the
previous question, indicate by check mark which financial
statement item the registrant has elected to follow.
Item 17
o Item 18
o
If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the
registrant is a shell company (as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act).
Yes
o No
þ
PRESENTATION
OF FINANCIAL INFORMATION
We have prepared our financial statements in this annual report
in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in
the United States (U.S. GAAP), which differ in
certain respects from accounting practices adopted in Brazil
(Brazilian GAAP). Brazilian GAAP is determined by
the requirements of Brazilian corporate law and the rules and
regulations of the Brazilian Securities Commission
(Comissão de Valores Mobiliários), or CVM.
We also publish Brazilian GAAP financial statements and use them
for reports to Brazilian shareholders, CVM filings, determining
the legal minimum dividend under Brazilian law and determining
our Brazilian tax liability. Beginning in 2008, significant
changes are being made to Brazilian corporate law to permit
Brazilian GAAP to converge with International Financial
Reporting Standards (IFRS). Pursuant to CVM
regulations, we are required to report our financial statements
in IFRS beginning with the year ending December 31, 2010.
Our financial statements and the other financial information
appearing in this annual report have been translated from
Brazilian reais into U.S. dollars on the basis
explained in Note 3 to our financial statements, unless we
indicate otherwise.
References to real, reais or
R$ are to Brazilian reais (plural) and to the
Brazilian real (singular), the official currency of
Brazil. References to U.S. dollars or
US$ are to United States dollars. References to
CAD are to Canadian dollars, and references to
A$ are to Australian dollars. Unless otherwise
specified, we use metric units. References to Vale
are to Companhia Vale do Rio Doce. References to us
or we are to Vale and, except where the context
otherwise requires, its consolidated subsidiaries. References to
our preferred shares are to our preferred
class A shares. References to our ADSs or
American Depositary Shares include both our common
American Depositary Shares (our common ADSs), each
of which represents one common share of Vale, and our preferred
American Depositary Shares (our preferred ADSs),
each of which represents one preferred share of Vale. American
Depositary Shares are represented by American Depositary
Receipts (ADRs) issued by the depositary.
1
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
This annual report contains statements that may constitute
forward-looking statements within the meaning of the safe harbor
provisions of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform
Act of 1995. Many of those forward-looking statements can be
identified by the use of forward-looking words such as
anticipate, believe, could,
expect, should, plan,
intend, estimate and
potential, among others. Those statements appear in
a number of places and include statements regarding our intent,
belief or current expectations with respect to:
|
|
|
|
|
our direction and future operation;
|
|
|
|
the implementation of our principal operating strategies,
including our potential participation in acquisition,
divestiture or joint venture transactions or other investment
opportunities;
|
|
|
|
the implementation of our financing strategy and capital
expenditure plans;
|
|
|
|
the exploration of mineral reserves and development of mining
facilities;
|
|
|
|
the depletion and exhaustion of mines and mineral reserves;
|
|
|
|
trends in commodity prices and demand for commodities;
|
|
|
|
the future impact of competition and regulation;
|
|
|
|
the payment of dividends;
|
|
|
|
industry trends, including the direction of prices and expected
levels of supply and demand;
|
|
|
|
other factors or trends affecting our financial condition or
results of operations; and
|
|
|
|
the factors discussed under Item 3. Key
informationRisk factors.
|
We caution you that forward-looking statements are not
guarantees of future performance and involve risks and
uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from those
in forward-looking statements as a result of various factors.
These risks and uncertainties include factors relating to
(a) the countries in which we operate, mainly Brazil and
Canada, (b) the global economy, (c) capital markets,
(d) the mining and metals businesses and their dependence
upon global industrial production, which is cyclical by nature,
and (e) the high degree of global competition in the
markets in which we operate. For additional information on
factors that could cause our actual results to differ from
expectations reflected in forward-looking statements, see
Item 3. Key informationRisk factors.
Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are
made, and we do not undertake any obligation to update them in
light of new information or future developments. All
forward-looking statements attributed to us or a person acting
on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by this
cautionary statement, and you should not place undue reliance on
any forward-looking statement.
2
PART I
|
|
Item 1.
|
Identity
of directors, senior management and advisors
|
Not applicable.
|
|
Item 2.
|
Offer
statistics and expected timetable
|
Not applicable.
SELECTED
FINANCIAL DATA
The tables below present selected consolidated financial
information as of and for the periods indicated. You should read
this information together with our consolidated financial
statements appearing in this annual report.
Statement
of income data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
Net operating revenues
|
|
|
8,066
|
|
|
|
12,792
|
|
|
|
19,651
|
|
|
|
32,242
|
|
|
|
37,426
|
|
Cost of products and services
|
|
|
(4,081)
|
|
|
|
(6,229)
|
|
|
|
(10,147)
|
|
|
|
(16,463)
|
|
|
|
(17,641)
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(452)
|
|
|
|
(583)
|
|
|
|
(816)
|
|
|
|
(1,245)
|
|
|
|
(1,748)
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
(153)
|
|
|
|
(277)
|
|
|
|
(481)
|
|
|
|
(733)
|
|
|
|
(1,085)
|
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(950)
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
(257)
|
|
|
|
(271)
|
|
|
|
(570)
|
|
|
|
(607)
|
|
|
|
(1,254)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
3,123
|
|
|
|
5,432
|
|
|
|
7,637
|
|
|
|
13,194
|
|
|
|
14,748
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-operating income (expenses):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial income (expenses)
|
|
|
(589)
|
|
|
|
(437)
|
|
|
|
(1,011)
|
|
|
|
(1,291)
|
|
|
|
(1,975)
|
|
Foreign exchange and monetary gains, net
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
299
|
|
|
|
529
|
|
|
|
2,553
|
|
|
|
364
|
|
Gain on sale of investments
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
674
|
|
|
|
777
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
(120)
|
|
|
|
(12)
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
2,039
|
|
|
|
(1,531)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes, equity results and minority interests
|
|
|
3,003
|
|
|
|
5,420
|
|
|
|
7,829
|
|
|
|
15,233
|
|
|
|
13,217
|
|
Income taxes charge
|
|
|
(749)
|
|
|
|
(880)
|
|
|
|
(1,432)
|
|
|
|
(3,201)
|
|
|
|
(535)
|
|
Equity in results of affiliates and joint ventures and change in
provision for gains on equity investments
|
|
|
542
|
|
|
|
760
|
|
|
|
710
|
|
|
|
595
|
|
|
|
794
|
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
(223)
|
|
|
|
(459)
|
|
|
|
(579)
|
|
|
|
(802)
|
|
|
|
(258)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
2,573
|
|
|
|
4,841
|
|
|
|
6,528
|
|
|
|
11,825
|
|
|
|
13,218
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash paid to shareholders(1)
|
|
|
787
|
|
|
|
1,300
|
|
|
|
1,300
|
|
|
|
1,875
|
|
|
|
2,850
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Consists of total cash paid to
shareholders, whether classified as dividends or interest on
shareholders equity, during the period.
|
3
Basic and
diluted earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31,(1)
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008(5)
|
|
|
|
(US$, except as noted)
|
|
|
Earnings per share(2):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per common share
|
|
|
0.56
|
|
|
|
1.05
|
|
|
|
1.35
|
|
|
|
2.41
|
|
|
|
2.58
|
|
Per preferred share
|
|
|
0.56
|
|
|
|
1.05
|
|
|
|
1.35
|
|
|
|
2.41
|
|
|
|
2.58
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.42
|
|
|
|
2.61
|
|
Per preferred share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.42
|
|
|
|
2.61
|
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding
(in thousands)(3):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares
|
|
|
2,943,216
|
|
|
|
2,943,216
|
|
|
|
2,943,216
|
|
|
|
2,943,216
|
|
|
|
3,028,817
|
|
Preferred shares
|
|
|
1,662,864
|
|
|
|
1,662,864
|
|
|
|
1,908,852
|
|
|
|
1,889,171
|
|
|
|
1,946,454
|
|
Treasury common shares underlying convertible notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,510
|
|
|
|
56,582
|
|
Treasury preferred shares underlying convertible notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,478
|
|
|
|
30,295
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
4,606,080
|
|
|
|
4,606,080
|
|
|
|
4,852,068
|
|
|
|
4,885,375
|
|
|
|
5,062,148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions to shareholders per share(4):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In US$
|
|
|
0.17
|
|
|
|
0.28
|
|
|
|
0.27
|
|
|
|
0.39
|
|
|
|
0.56
|
|
In reais
|
|
R$
|
0.49
|
|
|
R$
|
0.67
|
|
|
R$
|
0.58
|
|
|
R$
|
0.74
|
|
|
R$
|
1.09
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
We carried out two-for-one forward
stock splits in September 2007 and in May 2006 and a
three-for-one forward stock split in August 2004. Share and
per-share amounts for all periods give retroactive effect to all
forward stock splits.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Diluted earnings per share for 2007
and 2008 include preferred shares and common shares underlying
the mandatorily convertible notes due in 2010, which were issued
in June 2007.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Each common ADS represents one
common share and each preferred ADS represents one preferred
share.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Our distributions to shareholders
may be classified as either dividends or interest on
shareholders equity. Since 2004, part of each distribution
has been classified as interest on shareholders equity and
part as dividends. For information about distributions paid to
shareholders, see Item 8. Financial
informationDistributions.
|
|
(5)
|
|
In July 2008, we issued 80,079,223
common ADSs, 176,847,543 common shares, 63,506,751 preferred
ADSs and 100,896,048 preferred shares in a global equity
offering. In August 2008, we issued an additional 24,660,419
preferred shares. In October 2008, our Board of Directors
approved a share buy-back program. As of December 31, 2008,
we had acquired 18,355,859 common shares and 46,513,400
preferred shares, which are held in treasury. For more
information see Item 16E. Purchases of equity securities
by the issuer and affiliated purchasers.
|
4
Balance
sheet data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
3,890
|
|
|
|
4,775
|
|
|
|
12,940
|
|
|
|
11,380
|
|
|
|
23,238
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
9,063
|
|
|
|
14,166
|
|
|
|
38,007
|
|
|
|
54,625
|
|
|
|
49,329
|
|
Investments in affiliated companies and joint ventures and other
investments
|
|
|
1,159
|
|
|
|
1,672
|
|
|
|
2,353
|
|
|
|
2,922
|
|
|
|
2,408
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
1,603
|
|
|
|
2,031
|
|
|
|
7,626
|
|
|
|
7,790
|
|
|
|
4,956
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
15,715
|
|
|
|
22,644
|
|
|
|
60,926
|
|
|
|
76,717
|
|
|
|
79,931
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
2,455
|
|
|
|
3,325
|
|
|
|
7,312
|
|
|
|
10,083
|
|
|
|
7,237
|
|
Long-term liabilities(1)
|
|
|
1,867
|
|
|
|
2,410
|
|
|
|
10,008
|
|
|
|
13,195
|
|
|
|
10,112
|
|
Long-term debt(2)
|
|
|
3,214
|
|
|
|
3,714
|
|
|
|
21,122
|
|
|
|
17,608
|
|
|
|
17,535
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
7,536
|
|
|
|
9,449
|
|
|
|
38,442
|
|
|
|
40,886
|
|
|
|
34,884
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
788
|
|
|
|
1,218
|
|
|
|
2,811
|
|
|
|
2,555
|
|
|
|
2,491
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital stock
|
|
|
3,209
|
|
|
|
5,868
|
|
|
|
8,119
|
|
|
|
12,306
|
|
|
|
23,848
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
498
|
|
|
|
498
|
|
|
|
498
|
|
|
|
498
|
|
|
|
393
|
|
Mandatorily convertible notescommon ADSs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,288
|
|
|
|
1,288
|
|
Mandatorily convertible notespreferred ADSs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
581
|
|
|
|
581
|
|
Reserves and retained earnings
|
|
|
3,684
|
|
|
|
5,611
|
|
|
|
11,056
|
|
|
|
18,603
|
|
|
|
16,446
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
7,391
|
|
|
|
11,977
|
|
|
|
19,673
|
|
|
|
33,276
|
|
|
|
42,556
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
|
15,715
|
|
|
|
22,644
|
|
|
|
60,926
|
|
|
|
76,717
|
|
|
|
79,931
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Excludes long-term debt.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Excludes current portion of
long-term debt.
|
5
RISK
FACTORS
Risks
relating to our business
The
global recession could lead to a significant reduction in our
revenues, cash flow and profitability.
The global economy, and in particular global industrial
production, is the primary driver of demand for minerals and
metals. Global industrial production has been trending downward
since the second half of 2008, resulting in a significant and
widespread contraction in demand for minerals and metals,
including an unprecedented decline in global demand for iron
ore, our main product.
There is uncertainty about the depth and duration of the current
global economic downturn and its continuing impact on the demand
for minerals and metals. To avoid significant inventory
accumulation, we have been reducing production of several
products, which will have a negative impact on our cash
generation and profitability.
Slowing
economic growth in China could have a negative impact on our
revenues, cash flow and profitability.
China has been the main driver of the global demand for minerals
and metals over the last few years. In 2008, Chinese demand
represented approximately 53% of global demand for seaborne iron
ore, 29% of global demand for nickel, 34% of global demand for
aluminum and 27% of global demand for copper. The percentage of
our gross revenues attributable to sales to consumers in China
was 17.4% in 2008. A contraction of Chinas economic growth
could result in lower demand for our products, leading to lower
revenues, cash flow and profitability.
Chinese economic growth has been decelerating sharply as a
result of a tightening domestic credit market and slowing
exports. The strong decline in credit growth from the last
quarter of 2007 through the third quarter of 2008 significantly
impeded growth in the real estate sector, one of the largest
consumers of steel in China. Although the Chinese government is
increasing expenditure on infrastructure and public housing,
launching tax incentives, and taking measures to ease credit
tightness, there is uncertainty about the extent and duration of
the current growth deceleration.
A
decline in demand for steel would adversely affect our
business.
Demand for our most important products depends on global demand
for steel. Iron ore and iron ore pellets, which together
accounted for 57.3% of our 2008 gross revenues, are used to
produce carbon steel. Nickel, which accounted for 15.5% of our
2008 gross revenues, is used mainly to produce stainless
steel. Demand for steel depends heavily on global economic
conditions, but it also depends on a variety of regional and
sectoral factors. The prices of different steels and the
performance of the global steel industry are highly cyclical and
volatile, and these business cycles in the steel industry affect
demand and prices for our products. In addition, vertical
backward integration of the steel industry could reduce the
global seaborne trade of iron ore. The global seaborne trade of
iron ore could also suffer from competition from metallics, such
as semi-finished steel and scrap. In certain cases, it may be
more economical for steelmakers to charge more scrap in basic
oxygen furnaces (BOF) and electric arc furnaces
(EAF), instead of producing pig iron. Semi-finished
products, such as billets and slabs, may also be available from
fully-integrated steel mills at low cost, reducing overall
demand for seaborne iron ore.
From 2003 to 2007, growing worldwide demand for carbon steel led
to strong demand and rising prices for iron ore and iron ore
pellets. However, the acceleration of the global financial
crisis and the slowdown in Chinese demand since the second half
of 2008 have resulted in sharp cuts in global carbon steel
output, negatively affecting demand for iron ore and iron ore
pellets. Moreover, the global financial crisis has had a sharp
impact on Europe and Brazil, our natural markets for iron ore
and iron ore pellets. The European economy may recover more
slowly than other regions, which would negatively affect the
volume of our
6
shipments of iron ore and iron ore pellets to this region. A
sustained decline in prices or sales volumes for iron ore and
iron ore pellets would have a material adverse effect on our
revenues and earnings.
In response to high nickel prices, which reached record highs in
the second quarter of 2007 as a result of high demand for
stainless steel, producers and consumers of stainless steel
started shifting from stainless steel with high nickel content
(series 300) to stainless steels with either lower
nickel content (series 200) or no nickel content
(series 400). It is unclear whether this trend will
continue or potentially reverse in the midst of lower nickel
prices. Stainless steel production fell 2% in the first half of
2008, and declined 13% in the second half of 2008 relative to
2007, as a result of inventory de-stocking and the global
financial crisis. A sustained decline in austenitic stainless
steel production would have a material adverse effect on our
revenues from nickel.
The
prices of nickel, aluminum and copper, which are actively traded
on world commodity exchanges, are subject to significant
volatility.
Nickel, aluminum and copper are sold in an active global market
and traded on commodity exchanges, such as the London Metal
Exchange and the New York Mercantile Exchange. Prices for these
metals are subject to significant fluctuations and are affected
by many factors, including actual and expected global
macroeconomic and political conditions, levels of supply and
demand, the availability and cost of substitutes, inventory,
investments by commodity funds and others and actions of
participants in the commodity markets. Prices for these metals
are more volatile than contractual prices for products such as
iron ore, iron ore pellets and metallurgical coal, because they
respond more quickly to actual and expected changes in market
conditions.
Increased
direct or indirect substitution of primary nickel could
adversely affect our nickel business.
Demand for primary nickel may be negatively affected by the
direct substitution of primary nickel with other materials in
current applications. Scrap nickel competes directly with
primary nickel as a source of nickel for use in the production
of stainless steel, and the choice between them is largely
driven by their relative prices and availability. In 2008, the
stainless steel scrap ratio is estimated to have remained
relatively unchanged compared to 2007, at 49%. Nickel pig iron,
a product developed by Chinese steel and alloy makers that
utilizes low-grade lateritic nickel ores, competes with other
nickel sources in the production of stainless steel. In 2008,
nickel pig iron production declined approximately 17%, given
high production costs and lower nickel prices.
We may
not be able to reduce our production volume in response to lower
demand in a timely and
cost-efficient
manner.
Due to the slowdown in the global economy beginning in the
second half of 2008, demand for our products has declined
sharply. We have been taking measures to adjust our production
volume to the lower demand level, such as shutting down mines,
slowing down plant production, and undertaking maintenance ahead
of schedule. However, operating at significant idle capacity may
expose us to higher unit production costs, because a significant
portion of our cost structure is fixed in the short-term due to
the high capital intensity of mining operations. In addition,
there could be limits to cost cutting due to certain labor
regulations or previous labor or government agreements. During
periods of high demand, conversely, our ability to rapidly
increase production capacity is limited.
Regulatory,
political, economic and social conditions in the countries in
which we operate or have projects could adversely impact our
business and the market price of our securities.
Our financial performance may be negatively affected by
regulatory, political, economic and social conditions in
countries in which we have significant operations or projects,
particularly Brazil, Canada, Indonesia, Australia, New Caledonia
and Mozambique.
7
Our operations depend on authorizations from and concessions by
governmental regulatory agencies of the countries in which we
operate. For details about the authorizations and concessions
upon which our operations activities depend, see Item 4.
Information on the companyRegulatory matters. We are
subject to laws and regulations in many jurisdictions that can
change at any time, and changes in laws and regulations may
require modifications to our technologies and operations and
result in unanticipated capital expenditures. For example, a
mining law in Indonesia enacted in January 2009 may have
important implications for current and future mining operations
of PT International Nickel Indonesia Tbk (PT Inco).
See Item 4. Information on the companyRegulatory
mattersMining regulation.
Actual or potential political changes and changes in economic
policy may undermine investor confidence, result in economic
slowdowns and otherwise adversely affect the economic and other
conditions under which we operate in ways that could have a
material adverse effect on our business. Governments in emerging
economies such as Brazil, Indonesia and New Caledonia frequently
intervene in the economy and occasionally make substantial
changes in policy that could adversely affect exchange rates,
inflation, interest rates, rates of taxes or royalties and the
economic and regulatory environment in which we operate. For
example, a planned referendum in 2014 may result in New
Caledonia becoming fully independent from France, which may
result in political and economic changes that could adversely
affect our Goro project.
Protestors have taken actions to disrupt our operations and
projects, and they may continue to do so in the future. In New
Caledonia, protestors have in the past caused physical damage to
our Goro project and have impeded the construction of the marine
pipeline. Although we vigorously defend ourselves against
illegal acts, while supporting the communities living near our
operations, future attempts by protestors to harm our operations
could adversely affect our business.
Our
projects are subject to risks that may result in increased costs
or delay or prevent their successful
implementation.
We are investing to further increase our production capacity,
logistics capabilities and to expand the scope of minerals we
produce. Our expansion and mining projects are subject to a
number of risks that may adversely affect our growth prospects
and profitability, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
We may encounter delays or higher than expected costs in
obtaining the necessary equipment or services to build and
operate a project.
|
|
|
|
Our efforts to develop projects according to schedule may be
hampered by a lack of infrastructure, including a reliable power
supply.
|
|
|
|
We may fail to obtain, or experience delays or higher than
expected costs in obtaining, the required permits to build a
project.
|
|
|
|
Changes in market conditions or regulations may make a project
less profitable than expected at the time we initiated work
on it.
|
|
|
|
Adverse mining conditions may delay and hamper our ability to
produce the expected quantities of minerals.
|
|
|
|
Some of our development projects are located in regions where
tropical diseases, AIDS, malaria, yellow fever and other
contagious diseases are a major public health issue and pose
health and safety risks to our employees. If we are unable to
ensure the health and safety of our employees, our business may
be adversely affected.
|
Our
controlling shareholder has significant influence over Vale, and
the Brazilian government has certain veto rights.
As of March 31, 2009, Valepar S.A. owned 52.7% of our
outstanding common stock and 32.4% of our total outstanding
capital. As a result of its share ownership, Valepar can control
the outcome of some actions
8
that require shareholder approval. For a description of our
ownership structure and of the Valepar shareholders
agreement, see Item 7. Major shareholders and related
party transactionsMajor shareholders.
The Brazilian government owns 12 Vale golden shares, granting it
limited veto power over certain company actions, such as changes
to our name, the location of our headquarters and our corporate
purpose as it relates to mining activities. For a detailed
description of the Brazilian governments veto powers, see
Item 10. Additional informationCommon shares and
preferred sharesGeneral.
Our
governance and compliance processes may fail to prevent
regulatory penalties and reputational harm.
We operate in a global environment, and our activities straddle
multiple jurisdictions and complex regulatory frameworks with
increased enforcement activities worldwide. Our governance and
compliance processes, which include the review of internal
control over financial reporting, may not prevent future
breaches of law, accounting or governance standards. We may be
subject to breaches of our Code of Ethical Conduct, business
conduct protocols and instances of fraudulent behavior and
dishonesty by our employees, contractors or other agents. Our
failure to comply with applicable laws and other standards could
subject us to fines, loss of operating licenses and reputational
harm.
Many
of our operations depend on joint ventures or consortia, and our
business could be adversely affected if our partners fail to
observe their commitments.
We currently operate important parts of our pelletizing, nickel,
bauxite, coal and steel businesses through joint ventures with
other companies. Important parts of our electricity business are
operated through consortia. Our forecasts and plans for these
joint ventures and consortia assume that our partners will
observe their obligations to make capital contributions,
purchase products and, in some cases, provide managerial
personnel. If any of our partners fails to observe its
commitments, the affected joint venture or consortium may not be
able to operate in accordance with its business plans, or we may
have to increase the level of our investment to implement these
plans. For more information about our joint ventures, see
Item 4. Information on the companyLines of
business.
Environmental,
health and safety regulation may adversely affect our
business.
Our operations often involve the use, handling, disposal and
discharge of hazardous materials into the environment or the use
of natural resources, and nearly all aspects of our operations
and development projects around the world are subject to
environmental, health and safety regulation. Such regulation
requires us to obtain operating licenses, permits and other
approvals and to conduct environmental assessments prior to
initiating projects or undertaking significant changes to
existing operations. Difficulties in obtaining permits may lead
to construction delays or cost increases, and in some cases may
lead us to postpone or even abandon a project. Environmental
regulation also imposes standards and controls on activities
relating to mining, exploration, development, production,
reclamation, closure, monitoring and the refining, distribution
and marketing of our products. Such regulation may give rise to
significant costs and liabilities. In addition, community
activist groups and other stakeholders may increase demands for
environmentally-sustainable development, which could entail
significant costs and reduce our profitability.
Environmental regulation in many countries in which we operate
has become stricter in recent years, and it is possible that
more regulation or more aggressive enforcement of existing
regulations will adversely affect us by imposing restrictions on
our activities, creating new requirements for the issuance or
renewal of environmental licenses, raising our costs or
requiring us to engage in expensive reclamation efforts. For
more information on environmental, health and safety regulation
applicable to our operations, see Item 4. Information on
the companyRegulatory mattersEnvironmental
regulation and Item 8. Financial
informationLegal proceedings.
9
Our
reserve estimates may materially differ from mineral quantities
that we may be able to actually recover; our estimates of mine
life may prove inaccurate; and market price fluctuations and
changes in operating and capital costs may render certain ore
reserves uneconomical to mine.
Our reported ore reserves are estimated quantities of ore and
minerals that we have determined can be economically mined and
processed under present and anticipated conditions to extract
their mineral content. There are numerous uncertainties inherent
in estimating quantities of reserves and in projecting potential
future rates of mineral production, including many factors
beyond our control. Reserve engineering involves estimating
deposits of minerals that cannot be measured in an exact manner,
and the accuracy of any reserve estimate is a function of the
quality of available data and engineering and geological
interpretation and judgment. As a result, no assurance can be
given that the indicated amount of ore will be recovered or that
it will be recovered at the rates we anticipate. Estimates of
different engineers may vary, and results of our mining and
production subsequent to the date of an estimate may lead to
revision of estimates. Reserve estimates and estimates of mine
life may require revision based on actual production experience
and other factors. For example, fluctuations in the market
prices of minerals and metals, reduced recovery rates or
increased operating and capital costs due to inflation, exchange
rates or other factors may render proven and probable reserves
uneconomic to exploit and may ultimately result in a restatement
of reserves.
We may
not be able to replenish our reserves, which could adversely
affect our mining prospects.
We engage in mineral exploration, which is highly speculative in
nature, involves many risks and frequently is non-productive.
Our exploration programs, which involve significant capital
expenditures, may fail to result in the expansion or replacement
of reserves depleted by current production. If we do not develop
new reserves, we will not be able to sustain our current level
of production beyond the remaining lives of our existing mines.
Even
if we discover mineral deposits, we remain subject to drilling
and production risks, which could adversely affect the mining
process.
Once mineral deposits are discovered, it can take a number of
years from the initial phases of drilling until production is
possible, during which the economic feasibility of production
may change. Substantial time and expenditures are required to:
|
|
|
|
|
establish mineral reserves through drilling;
|
|
|
|
determine appropriate mining and metallurgical processes for
optimizing the recovery of metal contained in ore;
|
|
|
|
obtain environmental and other licenses;
|
|
|
|
construct mining, processing facilities and infrastructure
required for greenfield properties; and
|
|
|
|
obtain the ore or extract the metals from the ore.
|
If a project proves not to be economically feasible by the time
we are able to exploit it, we may incur substantial write-offs.
In addition, potential changes or complications involving
metallurgical and other technological processes arising during
the life of a project may result in cost overruns that may
render the project not economically feasible.
We
face rising extraction costs over time as reserves
deplete.
Reserves are gradually depleted in the ordinary course of a
given mining operation. As mining progresses, distances to the
primary crusher and to waste deposits become longer, pits become
steeper and underground operations become deeper. As a result,
over time, we usually experience rising unit extraction costs
with respect to each mine. Several of our mines have been
operating for long periods, and we will likely experience rising
extraction costs per unit in the future at these operations.
10
We may
face shortages of equipment, services and skilled
personnel.
From 2003 to 2007, the mining industry faced worldwide shortages
of mining and construction equipment, spare parts, contractors
and other skilled personnel as a result of high demand for
minerals and metals and the large number of projects under
development. We have experienced longer lead-times for mining
equipment and problems with the quality of contracted
engineering, construction and maintenance services. We compete
with other mining companies for highly skilled executives and
staff with relevant industry and technical experience, and we
may not be able to attract and retain such people. Shortages
during peak periods could negatively impact our operations,
resulting in higher production or capital expenditure costs,
production interruptions, higher inventory costs, project delays
and potentially lower production and revenues. While this risk
may be mitigated in the short term by economic conditions, we
believe it remains an issue in the medium-term upon the recovery
of the global economy.
Labor
disputes have disrupted our operations, and such disputes could
recur.
A substantial number of our employees, and some of the employees
of our subcontractors, are represented by labor unions and are
covered by collective bargaining or other labor agreements,
which are subject to periodic negotiation. Negotiation may
become more difficult in times of higher prices and increased
profits in the mining and metals industries, as labor unions may
seek wage increases. Strikes or work stoppages have occurred in
the past in Canada and Indonesia and could reoccur in connection
with negotiations of new labor agreements or during other
periods for other reasons, including the risk of layoffs during
a downcycle. Moreover, we could be adversely affected by labor
disruptions involving unrelated parties that may provide us with
goods or services. Strikes and other labor disruptions at any of
our operations could adversely affect the operation of
facilities and the timing of completion and the cost of our
capital projects.
Higher
energy costs or energy shortages would adversely affect our
business.
Energy costs are a significant component of our cost of
production, representing 16.6% of our total cost of goods sold
in 2008. To fulfill our energy needs, we depend on oil
by-products, which represented 33.7% of total energy needs in
2008 in TOE (tons of oil equivalent), electricity (40.4% on the
same basis), coal (12.4% on the same basis) and natural gas
(13.5% on the same basis).
Fuel costs represented 10.4% of our cost of goods sold in 2008.
Increases in oil and gas prices adversely affect margins in our
logistics, mining, iron ore pellets, nickel and alumina
businesses. Due to relatively high international oil prices,
which increased by 38% in 2008, and low nickel prices recently,
we have announced cuts in nickel production in Indonesia, where
we use oil generators.
Electricity costs represented 6.1% of our total cost of goods
sold in 2008. If we are unable to secure reliable access to
electric energy at acceptable prices, we may be forced to
curtail production or may experience higher production costs,
either of which would adversely affect our results of
operations. Due to relatively high electricity prices and low
aluminum prices recently, we have announced a production
curtailment at one of our aluminum smelters, which pays
electricity at spot prices.
Electricity shortages have occurred in Brazil in the past and
could reoccur in the future, and there can be no assurance that
the Brazilian governments policies will succeed in
encouraging growth in power generation capacity. Future
shortages, and government efforts to respond to or prevent
shortages, may adversely impact the cost or supply of
electricity for our Brazilian aluminum and ferroalloy
operations, which are electricity-intensive. Changes in the
laws, regulations or governmental policies regarding the power
sector or concession requirements could reduce our expected
returns from our investments in power generation. See
Item 4. Information on the companyRegulatory
mattersElectric energy regulation.
Through our subsidiary PT Inco, we process lateritic nickel ores
using a pyrometallurgical process, which is energy-intensive.
Although PT Inco currently generates a majority of the
electricity for its operations from its own hydroelectric power
plants, hydrological factors, such as low rainfalls, could
adversely affect electricity production at PT Incos plants
in the future, which could significantly increase the risk of
higher costs or
11
lower production volume. For more information on the regulations
governing energy production, see Item 4. Information on
the companyRegulatory mattersElectric energy
regulation.
Price
volatility of the currencies in which we conduct operations
relative to the U.S. dollar could adversely affect our financial
condition and results of operations.
We are affected by fluctuations in the prices of the currencies
in which we conduct operations relative to the U.S. dollar.
A substantial portion of our revenues and debt is denominated in
U.S. dollars, and changes in exchange rates may result in
losses or gains on our net U.S. dollar-denominated
indebtedness and accounts payable. In 2008, 2007 and 2006,
changes in exchange rates produced net foreign exchange gains
(loss) of US$(1.011) billion, US$1.639 billion and
US$452 million, respectively. In addition, the price
volatility of the Brazilian real, the Canadian dollar,
the Indonesian rupiah and other currencies against the
U.S. dollar affect our results since most of our costs of
goods sold are denominated in currencies other than the
U.S. dollar, principally the real (62% in
2008) and the Canadian dollar (20% in 2008), while our
revenues are mostly U.S. dollar-denominated. Currency
fluctuations are expected to continue to affect our financial
income, expense and cash flow generation.
Significant volatility in currency prices may also result in
disruption of countries foreign exchange markets and may
limit our ability to transfer or to convert such currencies into
U.S. dollars and other currencies for the purpose of making
timely payments of interest and principal on our indebtedness.
The governments of countries in which we operate may institute
restrictive exchange rate policies in the future.
We may
not have adequate insurance coverage for some business
risks.
Our businesses are generally subject to a number of risks and
hazards, which could result in damage to, or destruction of,
mineral properties, facilities and equipment. The insurance we
maintain against risks that are typical in our business may not
provide adequate coverage. Insurance against some risks
(including liabilities for environmental pollution or certain
hazards or interruption of certain business activities) may not
be available at a reasonable cost, or at all. As a result,
accidents or other negative developments involving our mining,
production or transportation facilities could have a material
adverse effect on our operations.
Risks
relating to our American Depositary Shares
If ADR
holders exchange ADSs for the underlying shares, they risk
losing the ability to remit foreign currency abroad and
Brazilian tax advantages.
The Brazilian custodian for the shares underlying our ADSs will
maintain an electronic registration from the Central Bank of
Brazil entitling it to remit U.S. dollars outside Brazil
for payments of dividends and other distributions relating to
the shares underlying our ADSs or upon the disposition of the
underlying shares. If an ADR holder exchanges its ADSs for the
underlying shares, it will be entitled to rely on the
custodians electronic registration for only five business
days from the date of exchange. Thereafter, an ADR holder may
not be able to obtain and remit U.S. dollars abroad upon
the disposition of, or distributions relating to, the underlying
shares unless it obtains its own electronic registration by
registering the investment in the underlying shares under
Resolution No. 2,689 of the National Monetary Council,
which permits qualifying institutional foreign investors to buy
and sell securities on the São Paulo Stock Exchange (the
BOVESPA). For more information regarding these
exchange controls, see Item 10. Additional
informationExchange controls and other limitations
affecting security holders. If an ADR holder attempts to
obtain its own electronic registration, it may incur expenses or
suffer delays in the application process, which could delay the
receipt of dividends or distributions relating to the underlying
shares or the return of capital in a timely manner.
We cannot assure ADR holders that the custodians
electronic registration or any certificate of foreign capital
registration obtained by them will not be affected by future
legislative changes, or that additional restrictions applicable
to ADR holders, the disposition of the underlying shares or the
repatriation of the proceeds from disposition will not be
imposed in the future.
12
ADR
holders may be unable to exercise preemptive rights relating to
the shares underlying their ADSs.
ADR holders may not be able to exercise preemptive rights, or
exercise other types of rights, with respect to the underlying
shares. The ability of ADR holders to exercise preemptive rights
is not assured, particularly if the applicable law in the
holders jurisdiction (for example, the Securities Act in
the United States) requires that either a registration statement
be effective with respect to those rights or an exemption be
available. We are not obligated to file a registration statement
in the United States, or to make any other similar filing in any
other jurisdiction, relating to preemptive rights with respect
to the underlying shares or to undertake steps that may be
needed to make exemptions from registration available, and we
cannot assure ADR holders that we will file any registration
statement or take such steps. For a more complete description of
preemptive rights with respect to the underlying shares, see
Item 10. Additional informationCommon shares and
preferred sharesPreemptive rights.
ADR
holders may encounter difficulties in the exercise of voting
rights.
ADR holders do not have the rights of shareholders. They have
only the contractual rights set forth for their benefit under
the deposit agreements. ADR holders are not permitted to attend
shareholders meetings, and they may only vote by providing
instructions to the depositary. In the event that we fail to
provide the depositary with voting materials on a timely basis,
or the depositary does not provide sufficient time for ADR
holders to submit voting instructions, ADR holders will not be
able to vote. With respect to ADSs for which instructions are
not received, the depositary may, subject to certain
limitations, grant a proxy to a person designated by us.
Brazilian
securities markets are not as highly regulated as the securities
markets in certain other jurisdictions.
ADR holders may be disadvantaged by the fact that the Brazilian
securities markets are not as highly regulated and supervised as
the securities markets in the United States or in certain other
jurisdictions. Rules and policies against self-dealing and
regarding the preservation of minority shareholder interests may
be less well-developed and enforced in Brazil than in the United
States or in certain other jurisdictions. For example, when
compared to Delaware corporate law, Brazilian corporate law and
practice have less detailed and well-established rules and
judicial precedents relating to the review of management
decisions against duty of care and duty of loyalty standards in
the context of corporate restructurings, transactions with
related parties, and sale-of-business transactions. Moreover,
shareholders in Brazilian companies ordinarily do not have
standing to bring a
class-action
lawsuit. As a foreign private issuer, we are not required to
follow many of the corporate governance rules that apply to
U.S. domestic issuers with securities listed on the New
York Stock Exchange, and we are not subject to the
U.S. proxy rules. For more information concerning our
corporate governance policies, see Item 16G. Corporate
governance.
13
|
|
Item 4.
|
Information
on the company
|
BUSINESS
OVERVIEW
General
We are the second-largest metals and mining company in the world
and the largest in the Americas, based on market capitalization.
We are the worlds largest producer of iron ore and iron
ore pellets and the worlds second-largest producer of
nickel. We are one of the worlds largest producers of
manganese ore, ferroalloys and kaolin. We also produce bauxite,
alumina, aluminum, copper, coal, cobalt, precious metals, potash
and other products. To support our growth strategy, we are
actively engaged in mineral exploration efforts in 22 countries
around the globe. We operate large logistics systems in Brazil,
including railroads, maritime terminals and a port, which are
integrated with our mining operations. Directly and through
affiliates and joint ventures, we have investments in the energy
and steel businesses.
The following table presents the breakdown of our total gross
revenues attributable to each of our main lines of business,
each of which is described following the table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006(1)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
Ferrous minerals:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iron ore
|
|
|
49.2%
|
|
|
|
39.0%
|
|
|
|
36.0%
|
|
|
|
46.2%
|
|
Iron ore pellets
|
|
|
9.7
|
|
|
|
7.7
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
|
|
|
11.2
|
|
Manganese
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
Ferroalloys
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Pig iron
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
61.7
|
|
|
|
48.9
|
|
|
|
46.8
|
|
|
|
61.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-ferrous minerals:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nickel(2)
|
|
|
11.6
|
|
|
|
25.6
|
|
|
|
30.3
|
|
|
|
15.5
|
|
Aluminum
|
|
|
11.7
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
|
|
|
8.2
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
Copper
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
PGMs(2)
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
Other precious metals(2)
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
Other non-ferrous minerals
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
31.0
|
|
|
|
45.3
|
|
|
|
47.5
|
|
|
|
31.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
Logistics
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Other investments
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Including Vale Incos
2006 gross revenues prior to its acquisition.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Revenues included in the nickel
product segment in our consolidated financial statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iron ore and iron ore pellets. We operate
three systems in Brazil for producing and distributing iron ore.
The Northern and the Southeastern Systems are fully integrated,
consisting of mines, railroads, a maritime terminal and a port.
The Southern System consists of three mining complexes and two
maritime terminals. We operate 10 pellet-producing facilities in
Brazil, one of which is a joint venture. We also have a 50%
stake in a joint venture that owns three pelletizing plants in
Brazil and a 25% stake in a pellet company in China.
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
Manganese and ferroalloys. We conduct our
manganese mining operations through subsidiaries in Brazil, and
we produce several types of manganese ferroalloys through
subsidiaries in Brazil, France and Norway.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nickel. Our principal nickel mines and
processing operations are conducted by our wholly-owned
subsidiary Vale Inco Limited (Vale Inco), which has
mining operations in Canada and Indonesia. We own and operate,
or have interests in, nickel refining facilities in the United
Kingdom, Japan, Taiwan, South Korea and China.
|
|
|
|
Aluminum. We are engaged in bauxite mining,
alumina refining, and aluminum metal smelting. In Brazil, we own
a bauxite mine, an alumina refinery and two aluminum smelters.
We have a 40% interest in Mineração Rio do Norte S.A.
(MRN), a bauxite producer, operations of which are
also located in Brazil.
|
|
|
|
Copper. We have copper mining operations in
Brazil and Canada. In Brazil, we produce copper concentrates at
Sossego in Carajás, in the state of Pará. In Canada,
we produce copper concentrate, copper anode and copper cathode
in conjunction with our nickel mining operations at Sudbury,
Thompson and Voiseys Bay.
|
|
|
|
PGMs. We produce platinum-group metals as by-products of
our nickel mining and processing operations in Canada. The PGMs
are concentrated at our Port Colborne facilities, in the
Province of Ontario, Canada, and refined at our precious metals
refinery in Acton, England.
|
|
|
|
Other precious metals. We produce gold and
silver as by-products of our nickel mining and processing
operations in Canada. Some of these precious metals are upgraded
at our facilities in Port Colborne, Ontario, and all are refined
by unrelated parties in Canada.
|
|
|
|
Other non-ferrous minerals. We are the
worlds fourth-largest producer of kaolin for the paper
industry and Brazils sole producer of potash. We produce
cobalt as a by-product of our nickel mining and processing
operations in Canada and refine it at our Port Colborne
facilities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coal. We produce metallurgical and thermal
coal through Vale Australia Holdings
(Vale Australia), which operates coal assets in
Australia through wholly-owned subsidiaries and unincorporated
joint ventures. We also have minority interests in Chinese coal
and coke producers.
|
|
|
|
Logistics. We are a leading provider of
logistics services in Brazil, with railroads, maritime terminals
and a port. Two of our three iron ore systems incorporate an
integrated railroad network linked to automated port and
terminal facilities, which provide rail transportation for our
mining products, general cargo and passengers, bulk terminal
storage, and ship loading services for our mining operations and
for customers. We also have a 31.3% interest in Log-In
Logística Intermodal S.A. (Log-In), which
provides container-based logistics services in Brazil, and a
41.5% interest in MRS Logística S.A. (MRS),
which transports our iron ore products from the Southern System
mines to our Guaíba Island and Itaguaí maritime
terminals, in the state of Rio de Janeiro.
|
Business
strategy
Our mission is to transform mineral resources into prosperity
and sustainable development. Our vision is to become the largest
mining company in the world and to surpass current standards of
excellence in research, development, project implementation and
business operations. Given the current economic environment, the
following objectives have assumed paramount importance in the
short term: cost minimization, operational and financial
flexibility and the reconciliation of cash preservation with the
pursuit of profitable growth options. However, we maintain our
long-term growth strategy, and we aim to increase our
geographical and product diversification and logistics
capabilities. We continue to review opportunities to make
strategic acquisitions,
15
while focusing on disciplined capital management in order to
maximize return on invested capital and total return to
shareholders. Below we highlight our major business strategies.
Maintaining
our leadership position in the global iron ore
market
We continue to consolidate our leadership in the global iron ore
market. In 2007 and 2008, we had an estimated market share of
32.5% and 30.2%, respectively, of the total volume traded in the
seaborne market. We are committed to maintaining our position in
the global iron ore market by strengthening relationships with
customers, focusing our product line to capture industry trends,
increasing our production capacity in line with demand growth,
controlling costs and strengthening our logistics infrastructure
of railroads, ports, shipping and distribution centers. We
believe that our strong relationships with major customers,
reinforced through long-term contracts, high quality products
and a strong technical marketing strategy, will help us achieve
this goal. We have also encouraged steelmakers to develop steel
slab plants in Brazil, through joint ventures in which we may
hold minority stakes, in order to create additional demand for
our iron ore.
Achieving
leadership in the nickel business
We are the worlds second-largest nickel producer, with
large-scale, long-life and low-cost operations, a substantial
resource base, advanced technology and a robust growth profile.
We are a leading producer of high-quality nickel products for
non-stainless steel applications, such as plating, alloy steels,
high nickel alloys and batteries, which represented 67% of our
nickel sales in 2008. Our long-term goal is to strengthen our
leadership in the nickel business. Given the challenges imposed
by the near- and medium-term prospects for the balance between
nickel supply and demand, we are exercising strong capital
discipline while evaluating our growth projects and the
ramp-up of
our Goro and Onça Puma projects.
Expanding
our aluminum activities
We are developing and increasing production capacity in our
aluminum operations, focusing on the upstream portion of the
production chain by developing low-cost bauxite and alumina
projects. We have large, undeveloped high-quality bauxite
reserves and opportunities for low-cost expansions in alumina
refining. We are working on the development of these
opportunities. We are also investing in mineral exploration to
increase our bauxite resources.
Developing
our copper resources
We believe that our Brazilian copper projects, which are all
situated in the Carajás mineral province, in the Brazilian
state of Pará, could be among the most competitive in the
world in terms of investment cost per metric ton of ore. We are
developing the Salobo project, and we are testing new technology
that, if successful, could permit the development of other
copper projects in this region. We expect these copper mines to
benefit from our infrastructure facilities serving the Northern
System. We are also engaged in mineral exploration in several
countries to increase our reserve base.
Investing
in coal
We are pursuing various opportunities to become a large global
player in coal businesses. We have coal operating assets and a
portfolio of exploration projects in Australia and two joint
ventures in China. In addition, we recently acquired coal assets
in Colombia. We intend to continue pursuing organic growth in
the coal business through the development of the Moatize project
in Mozambique, development of more advanced coal exploration
projects in Australia and mineral exploration initiatives in
several countries, including Colombia and Mongolia.
Investing
in fertilizers
We are pursuing various opportunities to become a large producer
of fertilizers in order to benefit from rising global
consumption. Per capita income growth correlates with increased
use of fertilizers. Recently, biofuels have emerged as another
driver of demand for fertilizers. Ethanol is made from sugar
cane in Brazil
16
and corn in the United States, while biodiesel is made mainly
from soybeans, palm and rapeseed. South America and emerging
Asian countries are expected to be the major drivers of future
growth in global potash consumption. Brazil is expected to play
a key role, given its position as a global agricultural
powerhouse where modernization has recently been taking place at
a fast pace and large investments in logistics infrastructure
are planned. We have a phosphate project in Peru under
development, and we recently acquired two potash projects, in
Argentina and Canada. Moreover, we are engaged in potash and
phosphate mineral exploration in several countries.
Diversification
and expansion of our resource base
We are engaged in an active mineral exploration program, with
efforts in 22 countries around the globe. We are mainly seeking
new deposits of bauxite, coal, copper, diamond, iron ore,
manganese ore, nickel, phosphate, platinum group metals, potash
and uranium. Mineral exploration is an important part of our
organic growth strategy.
Enhancing
our logistics capacity to support our iron ore
business
We believe that the quality of our railway assets and our many
years of experience as a railroad and port operator, together
with the lack of efficient transportation for general cargo in
Brazil, position us as a leader in the logistics business in
Brazil. We have been expanding the capacity of our railroads
primarily to meet the needs of our iron ore business.
To support our commercial strategy for our iron ore business, we
are investing in a dedicated shuttle service from Brazil to Asia
and in the development of distribution centers in Asia and the
Middle East in order to minimize the freight-cost differential
between Brazil and Australia to Asia and to increase the
competitiveness of our iron ore business in these regions.
Developing
power generation projects
Energy management and efficient supply have become a priority
for us. As a large consumer of electricity, we believe that
investing in power generation projects to support our operations
will help protect us against volatility in the price of energy,
regulatory uncertainties and the risk of energy shortages.
Accordingly, we have developed hydroelectric power generation
plants in Brazil, Canada and Indonesia, and we are using the
electricity from these projects to supply our internal needs. In
2007, we began investing in natural gas exploration in Brazil
through consortia. We are seeking to diversify and optimize our
energy matrix through increased use of thermal coal, renewable
fuels and natural gas.
Significant
changes in our business
The scope of our operations has been enlarged by acquisitions,
dispositions, the completion of major investment projects and
production adjustments. We summarize below the major
acquisitions, divestitures, investment projects and other
developments having a significant effect on our financial
performance since the beginning of 2008.
Production
adjustments
Since November 2008, we have been taking steps to adjust our
production plans given the change in the global economic
outlook. We have shut down some mines in the Southern and
Southeastern Systems, in the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil. In
addition, we have reduced the production pace at other sites to
adjust our output to anticipated lower sales volumes. Only three
of our 10 pellet plants are currently operating. We have shut
down five of the seven pellet plants located at the port of
Tubarão, in the state of Espírito Santo, Brazil, a
pellet plant in São Luís, in the state of
Maranhão, and a pellet plant in Fábrica, in the state
of Minas Gerais.
We stopped our manganese ore and ferroalloy operations in Brazil
from December 2008 to January 2009. We will keep our Dunkerque
ferroalloy plant in France idle until April 2009, and extend
furnace maintenance
17
at the plant in Mo I Rana, Norway, until June 2009. These
changes will cut production by 600,000 metric tons of manganese
ore and 90,000 metric tons of ferroalloys.
In December 2008, we shut down one of the two blast furnaces at
our pig iron operation in Carajás, which is now operating
at 40% of its nominal capacity.
In our nickel operations, we have discontinued the use of
higher-cost thermal power generation, which will lead to a
reduction of
nickel-in-matte
output by approximately 17,000 metric tons annually in
Indonesia. In January 2009, we shut down the Copper Cliff South
mine (CC South), located in the mining site of
Sudbury, province of Ontario, Canada, for an undetermined period
of time. CC South has an annual production capacity of 8,000
metric tons of finished nickel. We plan to shut down our Sudbury
operation for a period of eight weeks, from June 1 to
July 27, 2009, and our Voiseys Bay operation during
the entire month of July 2009.
In October 2008, we reduced activities at one of our aluminum
smelters, Valesul, located in the state of Rio de Janeiro,
Brazil, to 40% of its nominal annual capacity of 95,000 metric
tons, which was the level required to operate solely with energy
produced by Valesul. In April 2009 Valesul shifted from aluminum
smelting to being a producer of billets for extrusion using
purchased primary ingots and scrap as raw materials.
In response to weak market demand for kaolin, we reduced the
production by our subsidiary CADAM S.A., in the state of
Amapá, Brazil, by 30% of its nominal production capacity.
We reduced the kaolin production of our subsidiary PPSA by
200,000 metric tons per year at its sites in the state of
Pará, Brazil, effective January 1, 2009.
Companhia
Siderúrgica Vitória
We are acquiring the interest of our former joint venture
partner Baosteel Group Corporation in Companhia Siderúrgica
Vitória (CSV), which was established to
construct an integrated steel slab plant in the Brazilian state
of Espírito Santo.
Global
offer
In the second half of 2008, Vale conducted a global equity
offering of 256,926,766 common shares and 189,063,218 preferred
shares, including ADSs. The aggregate proceeds of the global
offering to Vale, after underwriting discounts and commissions,
and including the proceeds from the exercise of the
over-allotment option, were approximately US$12.2 billion,
which we intend to use for capital expenditures and strategic
acquisitions and to maximize our financial flexibility.
Pellet
plant leases
In 2008, we leased four pelletizing plants located in
Tubarão complex, in Vitória, in the Brazilian state of
Espírito Santo, which are owned by joint ventures in which
we have a stake. We have consolidated 100% of the sales and
related costs of pellets produced by these pelletizing
operations in our financial statements, which simplified and
increased the transparency of our operational and financial
reporting. These operating leases are consistent with our
continuous search for opportunities to maximize shareholder
value creation. They enabled us to increase our exposure to the
iron ore business and capture synergies arising from operations
at the Tubarão Port.
Investing
in shipping
As part of our commercial strategy for our iron ore business, we
are investing in the development of a maritime shuttle service
between Brazil and Asia that is intended to minimize the
freight-cost differential between Brazil and Australia to Asia
and to enhance our competitiveness in the Asian market, which we
expect to account for most of the future growth in the global
demand for iron ore. Accordingly, we have ordered the
construction of 12 large ore carriers, bought used ships and
entered into freight contracts. The
18
investment in new large ore carriers amounted to
US$1.6 billion, while we have spent US$74 million on
the acquisition of used ships.
Acquisitions
Copper
exploration assets in the African copperbelt
In December 2008, we entered into an agreement with African
Rainbow Minerals Limited and its
65%-owned
subsidiary, TEAL Exploration & Mining Incorporated
(TEAL), to acquire a 50% interest in a joint venture
company that will own TEALs subsidiaries for
CAD81 million, enhancing our strategic growth options in
the copper business in Africa. The transaction was completed in
the first quarter of 2009.
TEAL has three copper projects in the feasibility and approval
stages in the African copperbelt, which together could represent
a nominal production capacity of 65,000 metric tons of copper
per year in the next few years, and an extensive and highly
prospective copper exploration portfolio, which indicates a
potential for more than 300 million metric tons of high
grade ore (greater than 1.5% Cu).
Coal
assets in Colombia
In December 2008, we agreed to acquire 100% of the export coal
assets of Cementos Argos S.A. (Argos) in Colombia
for US$300 million. Argoss coal assets consist of two
mining concessions, a port and a minority stake in a railroad.
Since Colombia is the worlds third-largest exporter of
high-quality thermal coal, given its low level of sulfur and
high calorific value, we are seeking to build a coal asset
platform in the country to enhance our growth options in the
coal business. The acquisition was completed in the first
quarter of 2009.
Potash
deposits in Argentina and Canada
In the first quarter of 2009, we acquired from Rio Tinto Plc
(Rio Tinto) 100% of the Rio Colorado project
(Rio Colorado), in the provinces of Mendoza and
Neuquén, Argentina, and 100% of the Regina project
(Regina), in the province of Saskatchewan, Canada,
for US$850 million. Rio Colorado includes the development
of a mine with an initial nominal capacity of 2.4 Mtpy of
potash, with potential for expansion of up to 4.35 Mtpy,
construction of a
350-kilometer
railway spur, port facilities and a power plant. Regina is still
in the exploration stage, with potential to deliver an annual
output of 2.8 Mt of potash. Existing infrastructure near the
project will allow transportation of the final product to
Vancouver, facilitating access to the
fast-growing
Asian market.
Corumbá
iron ore assets
In January 2009, we agreed to acquire from Rio Tinto 100% of the
Corumbá open-pit iron ore mining operations in Brazil, with
associated logistics assets, for US$750 million. The
Corumbá iron ore mine is a world-class asset, characterized
by high grade and rich in direct-reduction lump ores. The
logistics assets support 70% of the operations
transportation needs. The acquisition of the Corumbá assets
is subject to certain Brazilian government approvals.
Mining
rights in Minas Gerais
In the second quarter of 2008, we acquired from
Mineração Apolo iron ore mining rights located in the
Rio Acima and Caeté districts, in the Brazilian state of
Minas Gerais. We made payments amounting to US$128 million
in 2008, and we will make remaining payments of R$7 million
(approximately US$3 million).
Organic
growth
We have a challenging program of investments in the organic
growth of our businesses. Our main investment projects are
summarized under Capital expenditures, and
detailed in the discussion of each of
19
our lines of business. The projects that have had the largest
impact on our financial performance since the beginning of 2008
are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
In our iron ore business, Fazendão started up in the first
quarter of 2008 and has an annual production capacity of
15.8 million metric tons of run-of-mine.
|
|
|
|
In iron ore pellets, we concluded two pellet projects in 2008,
Zhuhai and Samarco III, and one in the first half of 2009,
Vargem Grande (formerly Itabiritos). Vargem Grandes
operations have a nominal annual production capacity of
7 million metric tons.
|
|
|
|
In our nickel business, we completed the Dalian nickel
processing plant in 2008. Dalian, located in the province of
Liaoning, China, began operations in April 2008 and will process
the nickel oxide sinter produced by Goro, as well as other
existing operations. Dalian has annual production capacity of
35,000 metric tons of finished nickel. Goro, in New Caledonia,
is expected to start up in the first half of 2009 and to ramp up
over a four-year period to a nominal annual production capacity
of 60,000 metric tons of nickel and 4,600 metric tons of cobalt.
|
|
|
|
In our aluminum business, we completed the first expansion of
Paragominas (Paragominas II), from 5.4 to 9.9 million
metric tons per year, in the first half of 2008. We also
completed the construction of stages 6 and 7 at our Alunorte
alumina facility in Brazil, which started operating in the
second half of 2008, adding 1.9 million metric tons to its
nominal production capacity.
|
|
|
|
In copper, we started up a hydro-metallurgical plant in December
2008 to test the application of hydro-metallurgical technology
for industrial-scale processing of more complex copper minerals
to produce copper cathode. This plant processes copper
concentrate produced at our Sossego mine, in the Carajás
region of the Brazilian state of Pará. It has an annual
production capacity of 10,000 metric tons of copper cathode.
|
Divestitures
and asset sales
In line with our strategy, we have continued to reduce our
holdings of non-strategic assets. We summarize below our key
dispositions and asset sales since the beginning of 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
Jubilee Mines. In the first quarter of 2008,
we sold our minority stake in Jubilee Mines, a nickel-producing
company in Australia, for US$130 million.
|
|
|
|
Usiminas. In the second quarter of 2009, we
sold our remaining 2.93% interest in Usinas Siderúrgicas de
Minas Gerais S.A. (Usiminas) for R$595 million.
|
20
LINES OF
BUSINESS
Our principal lines of business consist of mining and logistics.
We also invest in energy to supply part of our consumption.
Below is an outline of the information provided in this section:
1.1 Iron ore
1.1.2 Production
1.1.3 Projects and exploration
1.2 Iron ore pellets
1.2.2 Production
1.2.3 Projects
1.3 Iron ore and iron ore pellets
|
|
|
1.3.1 Customers, sales and marketing
|
1.3.2 Competition
1.4 Manganese ore
1.5 Ferroalloys
1.6 Manganese ore and
ferroalloyscompetition
1.7 Pig iron
2.1 Nickel
2.1.2 Production
2.1.3 Projects and exploration
2.1.4 Customers, sales and marketing
2.1.5 Competition
2.2 Aluminum
2.2.2 Alumina
2.2.3 Aluminum
2.2.4 Customers and sales
2.2.5 Competition
2.3 Copper
2.3.2 Production
2.3.3 Projects and exploration
2.3.4 Customers and sales
2.3.5 Competition
2.4 PGMs and other precious metals
2.5 Other non-ferrous minerals
2.5.2 Kaolin
2.5.3 Potash
2.5.4 Projects and exploration
3.1 Operations
3.2 Production
3.3 Projects and exploration
3.4 Customers and sales
3.5 Competition
4.1 Logistics
4.1.2 Ports and maritime terminals
4.1.3 Shipping
4.1.4 Projects
4.2. Energy
4.2.2 Projects
5.1 Steel
The following map shows the locations of our operations
worldwide.
21
Our ferrous minerals business segment includes:
|
|
|
|
|
iron ore mining;
|
|
|
|
iron ore pellet production;
|
|
|
|
manganese ore mining; and
|
|
|
|
ferroalloy production.
|
1.1 Iron
ore
1.1.1 Operationsiron
ore
We conduct our iron ore business in Brazil, primarily at the
parent-company level and through our subsidiary Urucum
Mineração S.A. (Urucum). Our iron ore
mining and related operations are concentrated in three systems:
the Southeastern System, the Southern System and the Northern
System, each with its own transportation capability.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our share of capital
|
|
|
|
|
Company
|
|
System
|
|
Voting
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Partners
|
|
|
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vale
|
|
Northern, Southeastern and Southern
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Urucum
|
|
Southeastern
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
Southeastern
System
The Southeastern System mines are located in the Iron Quadrangle
region of the state of Minas Gerais, where they are divided into
three mining complexes (Itabira, Minas Centrais, and Mariana),
and in the state of Mato Grosso do Sul, where Urucums mine
is located.
The ore reserves in the three mining complexes have high ratios
of itabirite ore relative to hematite ore. Itabirite ore has
iron grade of
35-60% and
requires concentration to achieve shipping grade, which is at
least 63.5% average iron grade. The Urucum ore reserves have
high ratios of hematite ore, which has an average grade of
approximately 62.3%.
We conduct open-pit mining operations in the Southeastern
System. At the three mining complexes, we generally process the
run-of-mine
by means of standard crushing, classification and concentration
steps, producing sinter feed, lump ore and pellet feed in the
beneficiation plants located at the mining sites. At
Urucums mine, we generally process the
run-of-mine
by means of standard crushing and classification steps,
producing only lump ore. In 2008, we produced 99.4% of the
electric energy consumed in the Southeastern System at our
hydroelectric power plants (Igarapava, Porto Estrela, Funil,
Candonga, Aimorés, Capim Branco I and Capim Branco II).
We own and operate integrated railroad and terminal networks in
the three mining complexes, which are accessible by road or by
spur tracks of our EFVM railroad. The EFVM railroad connects
these mines to the Tubarão port in Vitória, in the
state of Espírito Santo. For a more detailed description of
the networks, see Logistics, below. We do not own
or operate logistics facilities at the site of Urucums
mine. Urucum iron ore is delivered to customers by barges
through the Paraguay River.
Southern
System
The Southern System mines are located in the Iron Quadrangle
region of the state of Minas Gerais in Brazil. The mines of
Minerações Brasileiras Reunidas (MBR) have
been incorporated into this system and
23
are now operated at the parent-company level pursuant to an
asset lease agreement. The Southern System has three major
mining complexes: the Minas Itabirito complex (comprised of four
mines, with two major beneficiation plants and three secondary
beneficiation plants); the Vargem Grande complex (comprised of
three mines and one major beneficiation plant); and the
Paraopeba complex (comprised of four mines and three
beneficiation plants).
We use wet beneficiation processes to convert
run-of-mine
obtained from open-pit mining operations into sinter feed, lump
ore and pellet feed, in addition to hematitinha, a
product used primarily by Brazilian pig-iron producers. In 2008,
we produced 72% of the electric energy consumed in the Southern
System at our hydroelectric power plants (Igarapava, Porto
Estrela, Funil, Candonga, Capim Branco I and Capim Branco II).
We enter into freight contracts with our affiliate, MRS, a
railway company, to transport our iron ore products at market
prices from the mines to our Guaíba Island and Itaguaí
maritime terminals in the state of Rio de Janeiro.
Northern
System
The Northern System mines, located in the Carajás mineral
province of the Brazilian state of Pará, contain some of
the largest iron ore deposits in the world. The reserves are
divided into northern and southern ranges situated approximately
35 kilometers apart. Since 1983, we have been conducting mining
activities in the northern range, which is divided into four
main mining bodies. The Northern System has open-pit mines and
an ore-processing plant. The mines are located on public lands
for which we hold mining concessions.
Because of the high grade (66.7% on average) of the Northern
System deposits, we do not have to operate a concentration plant
at Carajás. The beneficiation process consists simply of
sizing operations, including screening, hydrocycloning, crushing
and filtration. Output from the beneficiation process consists
of sinter feed, pellet feed, special fines for direct reduction
processes and lump ore. We obtain all of the electrical power
for the Northern System at market prices from regional utilities.
We operate an integrated railroad and terminal network in the
Northern System. After completion of the beneficiation process,
our EFC railroad transports the iron ore to the Ponta da Madeira
maritime terminal in the state of Maranhão. To support our
Carajás operations, we have housing and other facilities in
a nearby township. These operations are accessible by road, air
and rail.
24
1.1.2 Productioniron
ore
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production for the year ended December 31,
|
|
|
Nominal
|
|
|
Recovery
|
|
Mine/Plant
|
|
Type
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
capacity(1)
|
|
|
rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(million metric tons)
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
Southeastern System
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Itabira complex
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cauê(2)
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
23.7
|
|
|
|
24.8
|
|
|
|
21.5
|
|
|
|
24.6
|
|
|
|
69.8
|
|
Conceição(2)
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
23.3
|
|
|
|
21.9
|
|
|
|
20.3
|
|
|
|
22.0
|
|
|
|
74.7
|
|
Minas Centrais complex
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Água Limpa/Cururu(3)
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
55.5
|
|
Gongo Soco
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
|
|
80.0
|
|
Brucutu
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
7.7
|
|
|
|
21.9
|
|
|
|
26.4
|
|
|
|
30.0
|
|
|
|
74.0
|
|
Andrade(4)
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Mariana complex
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alegria
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
12.9
|
|
|
|
13.5
|
|
|
|
12.3
|
|
|
|
12.4
|
|
|
|
72.3
|
|
Fábrica Nova(5)
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
13.2
|
|
|
|
14.6
|
|
|
|
14.0
|
|
|
|
15.6
|
|
|
|
78.2
|
|
Fazendão(6)
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
9.8
|
|
|
|
15.8
|
|
|
|
92.8
|
|
Timbopeba
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Urucum
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
60.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Southeastern System
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98.0
|
|
|
|
114.9
|
|
|
|
116.4
|
|
|
|
134.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
Southern System(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minas Itabirito complex
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segredo/João Pereira
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
11.5
|
|
|
|
11.8
|
|
|
|
12.1
|
|
|
|
12.1
|
|
|
|
72.3
|
|
Sapecado/Galinheiro(8)
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
17.1
|
|
|
|
17.4
|
|
|
|
15.1
|
|
|
|
18.8
|
|
|
|
76.8
|
|
Vargem Grande complex
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tamanduá(9)
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
|
|
9.8
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
81.6
|
|
Capitão do Mato(9)
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
11.4
|
|
|
|
11.5
|
|
|
|
9.7
|
|
|
|
11.5
|
|
|
|
80.6
|
|
Abóboras
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Paraopeba Complex
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jangada
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
84.7
|
|
Córrego do Feijão
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
8.2
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
|
|
|
8.4
|
|
|
|
8.4
|
|
|
|
84.7
|
|
Capão Xavier
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
13.5
|
|
|
|
13.3
|
|
|
|
13.5
|
|
|
|
13.5
|
|
|
|
86.8
|
|
Mar Azul
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
90.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Southern System
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84.3
|
|
|
|
89.3
|
|
|
|
80.5
|
|
|
|
88.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
Northern System
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Serra Norte(10)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N4W
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
34.3
|
|
|
|
40.3
|
|
|
|
44.3
|
|
|
|
47.2
|
|
|
|
89.3
|
|
N4E
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
19.2
|
|
|
|
15.4
|
|
|
|
13.2
|
|
|
|
15.1
|
|
|
|
89.3
|
|
N5-W
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
15.2
|
|
|
|
30.4
|
|
|
|
34.7
|
|
|
|
34.7
|
|
|
|
89.3
|
|
N5E(11)
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
13.1
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
89.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Northern System
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81.8
|
|
|
|
91.7
|
|
|
|
96.5
|
|
|
|
100.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Vale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
264.2
|
|
|
|
295.9
|
|
|
|
293.4
|
|
|
|
323.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
These figures represent nominal
capacity in 2008, which is equivalent to planned production for
2008.
|
|
(2)
|
|
The
run-of-mine
from Minas do Meio is sent to the Cauê and
Conceição concentration plants.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Água Limpa/Cururu is owned by
Baovale, in which we own 100% of the voting shares and 50% of
the total shares. Production figures for Água Limpa/Curucu
have not been adjusted to reflect our ownership interest.
|
|
(4)
|
|
We lease the Andrade mine from
Companhia Siderúrgica Belgo-Mineira pursuant to a
40-year
contract.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Fábrica Nova ore is sent to
the Alegria and Fábrica Nova plants.
|
|
(6)
|
|
Fazendão ore is sent to the
Alegria plant and Samarco.
|
|
(7)
|
|
Former MBR mines were included in
other complexes in the Southern System.
|
|
(8)
|
|
Galinheiro mine was separated from
the Sapecado mine and includes the Pico mine.
|
|
(9)
|
|
Tamanduá and Capitão do
Mato ores are processed at the Vargem Grande plant.
|
|
(10)
|
|
All Serra Norte ores are processed
at the Carajás plant.
|
|
(11)
|
|
Our former N5E-N mine was
incorporated in the N5E reserve model.
|
25
1.1.3 Projects
and explorationiron ore
|
|
|
|
|
Carajás 130 mtpy. This brownfield
project, located in the Northern System, will add
30 million metric tons per year to our capacity with the
construction of a new composite primary crushing plant,
beneficiation and classification units and significant
investment in logistics (including car dumpers, stockyards and
sideways terminals). Our estimated total investment in this
project is US$2.478 billion. This project is currently
scheduled to come on stream in the first half of 2011, subject
to obtaining the required environmental licenses.
|
|
|
|
Carajás - additional 10 mtpy. This
brownfield project, also located in the Northern System, is
being developed to partially compensate for the delay of the
Carajás project described above. Our estimated total
investment in this project is US$290 million, representing
a relatively low capital expenditure cost per ton of US$29,
given the projects focus on increasing the capacity of
iron ore beneficiation.
Start-up is
scheduled for the second half of 2009.
|
|
|
|
Serra Sul (mine S11D). This project, located
in the Northern System, is the largest greenfield project in our
history and in the history of the iron ore industry. We expect
it to have an annual production capacity of 90 million
metric tons of iron ore. Completion is currently scheduled for
the first half of 2013, subject to obtaining the required
environmental licenses. Our estimated total investment in this
project is US$11.297 billion. This project is subject to
approval by our Board of Directors.
|
|
|
|
Apolo (previously Maquiné
- Baú). We expect this project,
located in the Southeastern System, to have annual production
capacity of 24 million metric tons. The estimated total
cost of the project, which is subject to approval by our Board
of Directors, is US$2.509 billion. Completion is scheduled
for the first half of 2013, subject to market conditions.
|
We are currently engaged in mineral exploration efforts for iron
ore deposits in several states in Brazil. We are also seeking
iron ore exploration opportunities in Africa, Australia and
India.
1.2 Iron
ore pellets
1.2.1 Operationsiron
ore pellets
Directly and through joint ventures, we produce iron ore pellets
in Brazil and in China, as set forth in the following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our share of capital
|
|
|
|
Company
|
|
Location
|
|
Voting (%)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Partners
|
|
|
|
Brazil:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vale
|
|
Tubarão, Fábrica, Vargem
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grande and São Luís
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hispanobras
|
|
Tubarão
|
|
|
51.0
|
|
|
|
50.9
|
|
|
Arcelor Mittal
|
Samarco
|
|
Mariana and Anchieta
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
|
BHP Billiton
|
|
|
China:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zhuhai YPM
|
|
Zhuhai, Guangdong
|
|
|
25.0
|
|
|
|
25.0
|
|
|
Zhuhai Yueyufeng Iron and Steel Co., Ltd Pioneer Iron and Steel
Group Co. Ltd.
|
In the Tubarão port area, in the Brazilian state of
Espírito Santo, we operate our wholly-owned pelletizing
plants, Tubarão I and II, four plants with respect to which
we signed operating leases in 2008, and our jointly-owned plant,
Hispanobras. We send iron ore from our Southeastern System mines
to these plants and use our logistics infrastructure to
distribute their final products.
26
Our São Luís pelletizing plant, located in the
Brazilian state of Maranhão, is part of the Northern
System. We send Carajás iron ore to this plant and ship its
production to customers through our Ponta da Madeira maritime
terminal.
The Fábrica and Vargem Grande (formerly Itabiritos)
pelletizing plants, located in the Brazilian state of Minas
Gerais, are part of the Southern System. We send some of the
iron ore from the Fábrica Nova mine to the Fábrica
plant, and we send iron ore from the Pico mine to the Vargem
Grande plant. We transport pellets from these plants using MRS.
Samarco operates a mine, Germano, and three pelletizing plants
in two operating sites. The Germano mine is located in Mariana,
Minas Gerais, close to our Southeastern System, and the
pelletizing plants are located in the Ponta Ubu unit, in
Anchieta, Espírito Santo. Iron ore from Germano and our
Southeastern System mine Fábrica Nova is sent to the
Samarco pelletizing plants using a
396-kilometer
pipeline, the longest pipeline in the world for the conveyance
of iron ore. Samarco has its own port facilities to transport
its production.
The Zhuhai YPM pelletizing plant, in China, is part of the
Yueyufeng Steelmaking Complex. It has port facilities, which we
use to send feed from our mines in Brazil. Zhuhai YPMs
main customer is Yueyufeng Iron & Steel
(YYS), which is also located in the Yueyufeng
Steelmaking Complex.
We sell pellet feed to our pelletizing joint ventures at market
prices. Historically, we have supplied all of the iron ore
requirements of our wholly-owned pelletizing plants and joint
ventures, except for Samarco and Zhuhai YPM, to which we supply
only a portion of their needs. Of our total 2008 pellet
production, 68.3% was blast furnace pellets, and the remaining
31.7% was direct reduction pellets, which are used in steel
mills that employ the direct reduction process rather than blast
furnace technology.
The following table sets forth information regarding our iron
ore sales to our pelletizing joint ventures for the periods
indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales for the year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(million metric tons)
|
|
|
Hispanobras
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Itabrasco(1)
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Kobrasco(2)
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
Nibrasco(3)
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
Samarco(4)
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
|
|
11.3
|
|
Zhuhai YPM(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
30.0
|
|
|
|
28.1
|
|
|
|
23.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Sales until September 2008, since
we signed a
10-year
operating lease contract for Itabrascos pelletizing plant
in October 2008.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Sales until May 2008, since we
signed a five-year operating lease contract for Kobrascos
pelletizing plant in June 2008.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Sales until April 2008, since we
signed a
30-year
operating lease contract for Nibrascos two pelletizing
plants in May 2008.
|
|
(4)
|
|
In 2006 we sold 1.9 million
metric tons of concentrate and 5.6 million metric tons of
run-of-mine;
in 2007 we sold 1.9 million metric tons of concentrate and
5.2 million metric tons of
run-of-mine;
and in 2008 we sold 1.8 million metric tons of concentrate
and 9.5 million metric tons of
run-of-mine.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Zhuhai YPM started operations in
January 2008.
|
27
1.2.2 Productioniron
ore pellets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production for the year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
Company
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Nominal capacity
|
|
|
|
(million metric tons)
|
|
|
Vale(1)
|
|
|
14.2
|
|
|
|
17.6
|
|
|
|
26.6
|
|
|
|
31.7
|
|
GIIC(2)
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hispanobras
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
Itabrasco(3)
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kobrasco(4)
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nibrasco(5)
|
|
|
9.1
|
|
|
|
9.0
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
Samarco
|
|
|
13.9
|
|
|
|
14.3
|
|
|
|
17.1
|
|
|
|
21.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
51.8
|
|
|
|
53.7
|
|
|
|
55.2
|
|
|
|
58.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Figure includes actual production,
including production from the four pellet plants we leased in
2008.
|
|
(2)
|
|
We sold our interest in GIIC in May
2006.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Production until September 2008,
since we signed a
10-year
operating lease contract for Itabrascos pelletizing plant
in October 2008.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Production until May 2008, since we
signed a five-year operating lease contract for Kobrascos
pelletizing plant in June 2008.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Production until April 2008, since
we signed a
30-year
operating lease contract for Nibrascos two pelletizing
plants in May 2008.
|
1.2.3 Projectsiron
ore pellets
|
|
|
|
|
Tubarão VIII. We are building a new
pelletizing plant at our existing seven-plant complex at the
Tubarão Port. We expect the plant to have annual production
capacity of 7.5 million metric tons. Completion is
scheduled for the first half of 2011. The estimated total cost
of this project is US$636 million. In response to market
conditions for iron ore pellets, we have temporarily slowed down
the project development.
|
|
|
|
Oman. In Oman, at the Sohar industrial
complex, we are developing a pelletizing plant, a bulk terminal
and a distribution center with capacity of 40 million
metric tons. The plant will have annual nominal production
capacity of 9 million metric tons of direct reduction
pellets. The estimated total cost of this project is
US$1.356 billion. Operations are scheduled to begin in the
second half of 2010.
|
1.3 Iron
ore and iron ore pellets
1.3.1 Customers,
sales and marketingiron ore and iron ore pellets
We supply all of our iron ore and iron ore pellets (including
our share of joint-venture pellet production) to the steel
industry. Prevailing and expected levels of demand for steel
products affect demand for our iron ore and iron ore pellets.
Demand for steel products is influenced by many factors, such as
global manufacturing production, civil construction and
infrastructure spending.
In 2008, China accounted for 28.7% of our iron ore and iron ore
pellet shipments, and Asia as a whole accounted for 47.8%.
Europe accounted for 24.4%, followed by Brazil with 19.0%. Our
10 largest customers collectively purchased 143.5 million
metric tons of iron ore and iron ore pellets from us,
representing 48.5% of our 2008 iron ore and iron ore pellet
shipments and 50.9% of our total iron ore and iron ore pellet
revenues. With the exception of Arcelor Mittal, which accounted
for 13.6% of our shipments of iron ore and iron ore pellets in
2008, no individual customer accounted for more than 10.0% of
our shipments of iron ore and iron ore pellets for any of the
three years ended December 31, 2008.
In 2008, the Asian market (primarily China and Japan) and the
European market were the primary markets for our blast furnace
pellets, while North America, the Middle East and North Africa
were the primary markets for our direct reduction pellets.
28
We strongly emphasize customer service in order to improve our
competitiveness. We work with our customers to understand their
main objectives and to provide them with iron ore solutions to
meet specific customer needs. Using our expertise in mining,
agglomeration and iron-making processes, we search for technical
solutions that will balance the best use of our world-class
mining assets and the satisfaction of our clients. We believe
that our ability to provide customers with a total iron ore
solution and the quality of our products are very important
advantages helping us to improve our competitiveness in relation
to competitors who may be more conveniently located
geographically. In addition to offering technical assistance to
our customers, we operate sales support offices in Tokyo
(Japan), Seoul (South Korea), Singapore, Muscat (Oman) and
Shanghai (China), which support the sales made by our
wholly-owned subsidiary located in Saint-Prex, Switzerland.
These offices also allow us to stay in close contact with our
customers, monitor their requirements and our contract
performance, and ensure that our customers receive timely
deliveries.
1.3.2 Competitioniron
ore and iron ore pellets
The global iron ore and iron ore pellet markets are highly
competitive. The main factors affecting competition are price,
quality, range of products offered, reliability, operating costs
and shipping costs.
Our biggest competitors in the Asian market are located in
Australia and include subsidiaries and affiliates of BHP
Billiton PLC and Rio Tinto Ltd. Although the transportation
costs of delivering iron ore from Australia to Asian customers
are generally lower than ours as a result of Australias
geographical proximity, we are competitive in the Asian market
for two main reasons.
First, steel companies generally seek to obtain the types (or
blends) of iron ore and iron ore pellets that can produce the
intended final product in the most economic and efficient
manner. Our iron ore has low impurity levels and other
properties that generally lead to lower processing costs. For
example, in addition to its high grade, the alumina grade of our
iron ore is very low compared to Australian ores, improving
productivity in blast furnaces, which is particularly important
during periods of high demand.
Second, steel companies often develop sales relationships based
on a reliable supply of a specific mix of iron ore and iron ore
pellets. We have a customer-oriented marketing policy and place
specialized personnel in direct contact with our clients to help
determine the blend that best suits each particular customer.
In terms of reliability, our ownership and operation of
logistics facilities in the Northern and Southeastern Systems
help us ensure that our products are delivered on time and at a
relatively low cost. In addition, we are developing a dedicated
shuttle service from Brazil to China, aimed at enhancing our
ability to offer our products in the Chinese market at
competitive prices and to increase our market share. To support
this strategy, we will order new ships, purchase used vessels
and enter into long-term freight contracts.
Our principal competitors in Europe are Kumba Iron Ore Limited;
Luossavaara Kiirunavaara AB (LKAB);
Société Nationale Industrielle et Minière
(SNIM); Rio Tinto Ltd.; and BHP Billiton. We are
competitive in the European market for the same reasons we are
competitive in Asia, as well as the proximity of our port
facilities to European customers.
The Brazilian iron ore market is also competitive. There are
several small iron ore producers and new companies with
developing projects, such as Anglo Ferrous Brazil, MMX, MHAG and
Bahia Mineração. At the same time, there are
vertically integrated steel companies such as CSN and
Mannesmann. Usiminas has become partially integrated with the
acquisition of an iron ore company. Although pricing is
relevant, quality and reliability are important competitive
factors as well. We believe that our integrated transportation
systems, high-quality ore and technical services make us a
strong competitor in the Brazilian market.
With respect to pellets, our major competitors are Luossavaara
Kiirunavaara AB (LKAB), Cleveland-Cliffs Inc.,
Quebec Cartier Mining Co., Iron Ore Company of Canada (a
subsidiary of Rio Tinto Ltd.) and Gulf Industrial Investment Co.
29
1.4 Manganese
ore
We conduct our manganese mining operations in Brazil through our
subsidiaries Vale Manganês S.A. (Vale
Manganês) and Urucum.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our share of capital
|
|
Company
|
|
Location
|
|
Voting
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
|
|
Brazil:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vale Manganês(1)
|
|
Pará and Minas Gerais
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Urucum
|
|
Mato Grosso do Sul
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Vale Manganêss mines are
Azul and Morro da Mina.
|
Our mines produce three types of manganese ore products:
|
|
|
|
|
metallurgical ore, used primarily for the production of
ferroalloys;
|
|
|
|
natural manganese dioxide, suitable for the manufacture of
electrolytic batteries; and
|
|
|
|
chemical ore, used in several industries for the production of
fertilizer, pesticides and animal feed, and used as a pigment in
the ceramics industry.
|
We operate
on-site
beneficiation plants at our Azul mine and at the Urucum mines,
which are accessible by road. The Azul and Urucum mines have
high-grade ores (at least 40% manganese grade), while our Morro
da Mina mine has low-grade ores. All of these mines obtain
electrical power at market prices from regional electric
utilities.
The following table sets forth information about our manganese
production.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production for the year ended December 31,
|
|
|
Nominal
|
|
|
Recovery
|
|
Mine
|
|
Type
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
capacity
|
|
|
rate
|
|
|
|
(million metric tons)
|
|
|
Azul(1)
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
63.3
|
|
Morro da Mina
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
93.2
|
|
Urucum(2)
|
|
Underground
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
83.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Given the need to prioritize iron
ore transportation through the EFC railroad, we shut down the
Azul mine from July to December 2007.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Urucum has a five-year renewable
lease agreement with CPFL for its plant in Corumbá, in the
Brazilian state of Mato Grosso do Sul.
|
We are seeking opportunities for mineral exploration and
development of manganese deposits mainly in Africa and Brazil.
30
1.5 Ferroalloys
The following table sets forth the subsidiaries through which we
conduct our ferroalloys business.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our share of capital
|
|
Company
|
|
Location
|
|
Voting
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
Vale Manganês
|
|
Minas Gerais and Bahia, Brazil
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Urucum
|
|
Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Vale Manganèse France
|
|
Dunkerque, France
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Vale Manganese Norway AS
|
|
Mo I Rana, Norway
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
We produce several types of manganese ferroalloys, such as high
carbon and medium carbon ferro-manganese and ferro-silicon
manganese. The production of ferroalloys consumes significant
amounts of electricity, representing 7% of our total consumption
in 2008. The electricity supply for our ferroalloy plant in
Dunkerque, France and Mo I Rana, Norway are provided through a
long-term contract. For information on the risks associated with
potential energy shortages, see Item 3. Key
informationRisk factors.
The following table sets forth information about our ferroalloys
production.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production for the year ended December 31,
|
|
|
Nominal
|
|
Company
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
capacity
|
|
|
|
(thousand metric tons)
|
|
|
Vale Manganês(1)
|
|
|
260
|
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
368
|
|
Urucum(2)
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Vale Manganèse France(3)
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
Vale Manganese Norway AS
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
NES(4)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
540
|
|
|
|
542
|
|
|
|
475
|
|
|
|
648
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Vale Manganês has five plants
in Brazil: Santa Rita, Barbacena and Ouro Preto in the state of
Minas Gerais; and Simões Filho in the state of Bahia. We
sold Vale Manganêss São João del-Rei plant
in June 2007. From January 2006 to October 2007, we reduced
capacity at Simões Filho due to weak demand for ferroalloys.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Urucum has one plant in
Corumbá in the Brazilian state of Mato Grosso do Sul.
|
|
(3)
|
|
From August to October 2007, we
shut down our furnace at Vale Manganèse France due to
technical problems. We shut it down again in August 2008 due to
technical problems, and it is currently undergoing repairs.
|
|
(4)
|
|
We sold our interest in NES (Nova
Era Silicon S.A.) in February 2006.
|
1.6 Manganese
ore and ferroalloyscompetition
The markets for manganese ore and ferroalloys are highly
competitive. Competition in the manganese ore market takes place
in two segments. High-grade manganese ore competes on a global
seaborne basis, while low-grade ore competes on a regional
basis. For some ferroalloys, high-grade ore is mandatory, while
for others high- and low-grade ores are complementary. The main
suppliers of high-grade ores are located in South Africa, Gabon,
Australia and Brazil. The main producers of low-grade ores are
located in Ukraine, China, Ghana, Kazakhstan, India and Mexico.
The ferroalloy market is characterized by a large number of
participants who compete primarily on the basis of price. The
principal competitive factors in this market are the costs of
manganese ore, electricity and logistics and reductants. We
compete both with stand-alone producers and integrated producers
that also mine their own ore. Our competitors are located
principally in countries that produce manganese ore or steel.
31
1.7 Pig
iron
We conduct a pig iron operation in northern Brazil. This
operation was conducted through our subsidiary Ferro-Gusa
Carajás S.A. (FGC) until April 2008, when FGC
was merged into Vale.
We utilize two conventional mini-blast furnaces to produce
approximately 350,000 metric tons of pig iron per year, using
iron ore from our Carajás mines in northern Brazil. The
charcoal source is exclusively from eucalyptus trees grown in a
cultivated forest of 82,000 acres, with the total project
encompassing approximately 200,000 acres.
2.1 Nickel
2.1.1 Operationsnickel
We conduct our nickel operations primarily through our
wholly-owned subsidiary Vale Inco. Vale Inco operates two nickel
production systems, one in North America and Europe and the
other in Asia and the South Pacific, as set forth in the
following table.
|
|
|
|
|
System
|
|
Location
|
|
Operations
|
|
North America & Europe
|
|
CanadaSudbury, Ontario
|
|
Fully integrated mines, mill, smelter and refinery (producing
intermediates and finished nickel and by-products)
|
|
|
CanadaThompson, Manitoba
|
|
Fully integrated mines, mill, smelter and refinery (producing
finished nickel and by-products)
|
|
|
CanadaVoiseys Bay, Newfoundland and Labrador
|
|
Mine and mill (producing nickel concentrate and by-products)
|
|
|
U.K.Clydach, Wales
|
|
Stand-alone nickel refinery (producing finished nickel)
|
Asia & the South Pacific
|
|
IndonesiaSorowako, Sulawesi(1)
|
|
Mining and processing operations (producing nickel matte, an
intermediate product)
|
|
|
JapanMatsuzaka(2)
|
|
Stand-alone nickel refinery (producing finished nickel)
|
|
|
TaiwanKaoshiung(3)
|
|
Stand-alone nickel refinery (producing finished nickel)
|
|
|
ChinaDalian, Liaoning(4)
|
|
Stand-alone nickel refinery (producing finished nickel)
|
|
|
South KoreaOnsan(5)
|
|
Stand-alone nickel refinery (producing finished nickel)
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Operations conducted through our
61%-owned subsidiary PT International Nickel Indonesia Tbk.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Operations conducted through our
67%-owned subsidiary Vale Inco Japan Limited.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Operations conducted through our
49.9%-owned subsidiary Taiwan Nickel Refining Corporation.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Operations conducted through our
98%-owned subsidiary Vale Inco New Nickel Materials (Dalian) Co.
Ltd.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Operations conducted through our
25% interest in Korea Nickel Corporation.
|
North
America & Europe
Sudbury
operations
Our long-established mines in Sudbury, Ontario, are primarily
underground operations with nickel sulfide ore bodies. These ore
bodies also contain co-deposits of copper, cobalt,
platinum-group metals, gold and silver. We have integrated
mining, milling, smelting and refining operations to process ore
into finished nickel at Sudbury. We also smelt and refine an
intermediate product, nickel concentrate, from our Voiseys
Bay operations. We ship a nickel intermediate product, nickel
oxide, from our Sudbury smelter to our nickel refineries in
Wales, Taiwan, China and South Korea for processing into
finished nickel. In 2008, we produced
32
19.1% of the electric energy consumed in Sudbury at our
hydroelectric power plants there. The remaining electricity was
purchased from Ontarios provincial electricity grid.
Thompson
operations
Our long-established mines in Thompson, Manitoba, are primarily
underground operations with nickel sulfide ore bodies. The ore
bodies also contain co-deposits of copper and cobalt. We have
integrated mining, milling, smelting and refining operations to
process ore into finished nickel at Thompson. We also smelt and
refine an intermediate product, nickel concentrate, from our
Voiseys Bay operations. Low-cost energy is available from
purchased hydroelectric power at our Thompson operations.
Voiseys
Bay operations
Our Voiseys Bay mine, in Newfoundland and Labrador, is an
open-pit operation with the potential for underground operations
at a later stage. We mine nickel sulfide ore bodies here, which
also contain co-deposits of copper and cobalt. We mill
Voiseys Bay ore on site and ship it as an intermediate
product (nickel concentrates) primarily to our Sudbury and
Thompson operations for final processing (smelting and
refining). A portion of our Voiseys Bay nickel concentrate
is also toll-smelted and toll-refined by unrelated parties in
Europe. The electricity requirements of our Voiseys Bay
mine are supplied through diesel generators.
Clydach
operations
Clydach is a stand-alone nickel refinery in the U.K. that
processes a nickel intermediate product, nickel oxide, supplied
from our Sudbury operations to produce finished nickel.
Asia &
the South Pacific
Sulawesi
operations
Our subsidiary PT Inco operates an open cast mining area and
related processing facility in Sorowako on the Island of
Sulawesi, Indonesia. PT Inco mines nickel laterite saprolite ore
and produces an intermediate product (nickel matte), which is
shipped primarily to our nickel refinery in Japan. Pursuant to
life-of-mine
off-take agreements, PT Inco sells 80% of its production to Vale
Inco and 20% of its production to Sumitomo Metal Mining Co.,
Ltd. (Sumitomo). PT Inco is a public company whose
shares are traded on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. We hold 61%
of its share capital, Sumitomo holds 20% and the remaining 19%
is publicly held.
Energy costs are a significant component of our nickel
production costs for the processing of lateritic ores at our PT
Inco operations in Indonesia. A major part of the electric
furnace power requirements of PT Inco is supplied at low cost by
its two hydroelectric power plants on the Larona River, Larona
and Balambano. PT Inco has thermal generating facilities in
order to supplement its hydroelectric power supply with a source
of energy that is not subject to hydrological factors. Since
October 2008, all thermal generating facilities have been shut
down in order to decrease operational costs. In 2008, the
hydroelectric power plants provided 81% of the electric energy
consumed at our Indonesian operations, and the oil generators
provided the remainder.
Asian
refinery operations
Our 67%-owned subsidiary Vale Inco Japan Limited operates a
refinery in Matsuzaka, which produces intermediate and finished
nickel products, primarily using nickel matte sourced from PT
Inco. Vale Inco Japan is a private company. The minority
interest is held by Sumitomo (13%), Daido Steel Co., Ltd. (9%),
Mitsui & Co., Ltd. (7%) and other Japanese companies
(5%).
We also operate or have investments in nickel refining
operations in Taiwan, China and South Korea, through our 49.9%
stake in Taiwan Nickel Refining Corporation (TNRC),
our 98% interest in Vale Inco New Nickel Materials (Dalian) Co.
Ltd. (VINNM) and our 25% stake in Korea Nickel
Corporation
33
(KNC). TNRC, INNM and KNC produce finished nickel
for the local stainless steel industry in Taiwan, China and
South Korea, primarily using intermediate products containing
about 75% nickel (in the form of nickel oxide) from Vale Inco
Japan and our Sudbury operations. Dalian is expected to start
receiving nickel oxide from Goro in late 2009.
Other
operations
Our 65%-owned joint venture Jinco Nonferrous Metals Co., Ltd
(Jinco) operates a nickel salts operation in China
(Kunshan, province of Jiangsu). Jinco produces nickel sulphate
and chloride, which are used in the nickel plating industry. The
remaining 35% of Jinco is held by Jinchuan Group Limited.
Through our wholly-owned subsidiary The International Metals
Reclamation Company, Inc., or INMETCO, in the United States
(Ellwood City, Pennsylvania), we process stainless steel waste,
end-of-life
batteries and other waste products primarily containing nickel,
chromium, iron and cadmium. We sell the resulting recovered
metals as a remelt alloy ingot to the stainless steel industry.
Through our wholly-owned subsidiary Novamet Specialty Products
Corporation, in the United States (Wyckoff, New Jersey), we
process and sell nickel powders.
Through our 77%-owned subsidiary Inco Advanced Technology
Materials (Shenyang) Co. Ltd. and our 76.7% subsidiary Inco
Advanced Technology Materials (Dalian) Co. Ltd., both in China,
we produce and sell nickel foam.
2.1.2 Productionnickel
The following table sets forth our annual mine production by
operating mine (or on an aggregate basis for PT Inco because it
has mining areas rather than mines) and the average percentage
grades of certain metals (nickel and copper). For our Sudbury,
Thompson and Voiseys Bay operations, the production and
average grades represent the mine product delivered to those
operations respective processing plants and do not include
adjustments due to beneficiation, smelting or refining. The mine
production at PT Inco represents the product from PT Incos
dryer kilns delivered to PT Incos smelting operations and
does not include nickel losses due to smelting. The following
table sets forth information about ore production at our nickel
mining sites.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
Production
|
|
|
Copper
|
|
|
Nickel
|
|
|
Production
|
|
|
Copper
|
|
|
Nickel
|
|
|
Production
|
|
|
Copper
|
|
|
Nickel
|
|
|
|
(thousands of metric tons, except percentages)
|
|
|
Ontario operating mines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copper Cliff North
|
|
|
1,341
|
|
|
|
1.19
|
|
|
|
0.96
|
|
|
|
1,078
|
|
|
|
0.92
|
|
|
|
0.84
|
|
|
|
1,165
|
|
|
|
1.01
|
|
|
|
1.01
|
|
Copper Cliff South(1)
|
|
|
879
|
|
|
|
1.94
|
|
|
|
1.63
|
|
|
|
883
|
|
|
|
1.71
|
|
|
|
1.46
|
|
|
|
771
|
|
|
|
1.67
|
|
|
|
1.48
|
|
Creighton
|
|
|
997
|
|
|
|
1.55
|
|
|
|
2.09
|
|
|
|
963
|
|
|
|
1.62
|
|
|
|
2.08
|
|
|
|
1,001
|
|
|
|
1.56
|
|
|
|
2.14
|
|
Stobie
|
|
|
2,808
|
|
|
|
0.68
|
|
|
|
0.75
|
|
|
|
2,850
|
|
|
|
0.68
|
|
|
|
0.72
|
|
|
|
2,892
|
|
|
|
0.65
|
|
|
|
0.72
|
|
Garson
|
|
|
721
|
|
|
|
1.19
|
|
|
|
1.60
|
|
|
|
692
|
|
|
|
1.58
|
|
|
|
1.59
|
|
|
|
840
|
|
|
|
1.72
|
|
|
|
1.69
|
|
Coleman
|
|
|
1,348
|
|
|
|
2.40
|
|
|
|
1.65
|
|
|
|
1,408
|
|
|
|
2.75
|
|
|
|
1.74
|
|
|
|
1,425
|
|
|
|
2.66
|
|
|
|
1.62
|
|
Gertrude
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
|
0.27
|
|
|
|
0.70
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
0.66
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
0.29
|
|
|
|
0.72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Ontario operations
|
|
|
8,301
|
|
|
|
1.32
|
%
|
|
|
1.25
|
%
|
|
|
7,887
|
|
|
|
1.39
|
%
|
|
|
1.25
|
%
|
|
|
8,219
|
|
|
|
1.36
|
%
|
|
|
1.26
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manitoba operating mines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thompson
|
|
|
1,214
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.08
|
|
|
|
1,380
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.83
|
|
|
|
1,320
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.77
|
|
Birchtree
|
|
|
1,069
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.62
|
|
|
|
1,164
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.52
|
|
|
|
971
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Manitoba operations
|
|
|
2,283
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.86
|
%
|
|
|
2,545
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.69
|
%
|
|
|
2,291
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.66
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voiseys Bay operating mines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ovoid
|
|
|
1,507
|
|
|
|
2.22
|
|
|
|
3.77
|
|
|
|
2,147
|
|
|
|
2.47
|
|
|
|
3.74
|
|
|
|
2,385
|
|
|
|
2.38
|
|
|
|
3.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Voiseys Bay operations
|
|
|
1,507
|
|
|
|
2.22
|
%
|
|
|
3.77
|
%
|
|
|
2,147
|
|
|
|
2.47
|
%
|
|
|
3.74
|
%
|
|
|
2,385
|
|
|
|
2.38
|
%
|
|
|
3.50
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
Production
|
|
|
Copper
|
|
|
Nickel
|
|
|
Production
|
|
|
Copper
|
|
|
Nickel
|
|
|
Production
|
|
|
Copper
|
|
|
Nickel
|
|
|
|
(thousands of metric tons, except percentages)
|
|
|
Sulawesi operating mining areas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sorowako
|
|
|
4,459
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.95
|
|
|
|
4,615
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.03
|
|
|
|
4,258
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.08
|
|
Pomalaa(2)
|
|
|
685
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.30
|
|
|
|
645
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.30
|
|
|
|
417
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Sulawesi operations
|
|
|
5,144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.00
|
%
|
|
|
5,260
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.06
|
%
|
|
|
4,675
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.10
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
This mine has been closed
indefinitely since January 2009.
|
|
(2)
|
|
This mine has been closed
indefinitely since May 2008.
|
The following table sets forth information about our finished
nickel production. Finished nickel includes (i) nickel
refined through our facilities, (ii) nickel further refined
into specialty products, and (iii) intermediates designated
for sale. The numbers below are reported on an ore-source basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production for the year ended December 31,
|
|
|
Nominal
|
|
Mine
|
|
Type
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
capacity(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(thousand metric tons)
|
|
|
Sudbury(2)
|
|
Underground
|
|
|
82.0
|
|
|
|
70.7
|
|
|
|
85.3
|
|
|
|
91.5
|
|
Thompson(2)
|
|
Underground
|
|
|
30.3
|
|
|
|
29.8
|
|
|
|
28.9
|
|
|
|
38.3
|
|
Voiseys Bay(3)
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
35.5
|
|
|
|
58.9
|
|
|
|
77.5
|
|
|
|
77.5
|
|
Sorowako(4)
|
|
Open cast
|
|
|
70.0
|
|
|
|
75.8
|
|
|
|
68.3
|
|
|
|
78.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
External(5)
|
|
|
|
|
17.1
|
|
|
|
12.7
|
|
|
|
15.4
|
|
|
|
18.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total(6)
|
|
|
|
|
234.9
|
|
|
|
247.9
|
|
|
|
275.4
|
|
|
|
304.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
These figures represent nominal
capacity in 2008, which is equivalent to planned production for
2008 (except for Voiseys Bay, for which nominal capacity
is equivalent to actual production for 2008).
|
|
(2)
|
|
Figures for 2006 and 2007 were
revised to exclude finished nickel we produced using feeds
purchased from unrelated parties. Primary nickel production only
(does not include secondary nickel from INMETCO).
|
|
(3)
|
|
Includes finished nickel produced
at our Sudbury and Thompson operations, as well as some finished
nickel produced by unrelated parties under toll-smelting and
toll-refining arrangements.
|
|
(4)
|
|
We have a 61% interest in PT Inco,
which owns the Sorowako mines, and these figures include the
minority interests.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Finished nickel processed at our
facilities using feeds purchased from unrelated parties.
|
|
(6)
|
|
Excludes finished nickel produced
under toll-smelting and refining arrangements covering purchased
intermediates with unrelated parties. Unrelated-party tolling of
purchased intermediates was 16.1 thousand metric tons in 2006,
14.2 thousand metric tons in 2007 and 7.5 thousand metric tons
in 2008.
|
2.1.3 Projects
and explorationnickel
|
|
|
|
|
Goro. Located in New Caledonia, in the South
Pacific, Goro has one of the largest deposits of lateritic
nickel in the world. We expect it to reach nominal annual
production capacity of 60,000 metric tons of nickel in the form
of nickel oxide sinter and 4,600 metric tons of cobalt. Our
estimated total investment in this project is
US$4.083 billion. Operations are scheduled to begin in the
first half of 2009 and to ramp up over a four-year period in
order to mitigate operational risks.
|
|
|
|
Onça Puma. Onça Puma is a nickel
mine built on deposits of nickel laterite (saprolite) in the
Brazilian state of Pará. We expect it to reach nominal
annual production capacity of 58,000 metric tons of nickel in
ferro-nickel, its final product. The total estimated investment
in this project is US$2.297 billion.
|
|
|
|
Totten. Totten is a nickel mine in Sudbury,
Ontario. The estimated total cost of Totten is
US$362 million, and completion is scheduled for the first
half of 2011, subject to market conditions. The new mine will
have annual production capacity of 8,200 metric tons of nickel,
with copper and precious metals (platinum, gold and silver) as
by-products.
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
Voiseys Bay processing
facility. Pursuant to an agreement with the
government of the Province of Newfoundland and Labrador, we are
required to construct a commercial nickel processing facility in
Newfoundland and Labrador to produce approximately 50,000 metric
tons of finished nickel per year together with up to 5,000
metric tons of copper and 2,500 metric tons of cobalt, utilizing
the ore from the Ovoid mine at our Voiseys Bay mining
site. The most recent budget approved by our Board of Directors
for this project was US$2.177 billion. We are contractually
obligated to complete the construction of the facility by the
first quarter of 2013. The total investment for this project is
subject to board approval.
|
|
|
|
Clarabelle Mill expansion. The expansion of
Clarabelle Mill, a processing plant in Sudbury, consists of
increasing ore beneficiation capacity, while improving recovery
rates for nickel and copper. The estimated total cost is
US$1.272 billion. Completion of the project, which is
subject to board approval and to market conditions, is scheduled
for the second half of 2011.
|
We are engaged in greenfield exploration for nickel, with
several active programs and projects in Australia, Brazil,
Canada, China, Yemen, Mongolia and the Philippines. We are
engaged in brownfield exploration for nickel in Canada and
Indonesia.
2.1.4 Customers,
sales and marketingnickel
Our customers are broadly distributed on a global basis. In
2008, 56.2% of our total nickel sales were delivered to
customers in Asia, 27.2% to North America, 11.6% to Europe and
5.0% to other locations. We have short-term fixed-volume
contracts with customers for the majority of our expected annual
nickel sales. These contracts, together with our sales of
proprietary and multi-use nickel products, provide stable demand
for a significant portion of our annual production.
Nickel is an exchange-traded metal, listed on the London Metal
Exchange (LME), and most nickel products are priced
according to a discount or premium to the LME price, depending
on the nickel products physical and technical
characteristics. Our finished nickel products represent what is
known in the industry as primary nickel, meaning
nickel produced principally from nickel ores (as opposed to
secondary nickel, which is recovered from recycled
nickel-containing material). Finished primary nickel products
are distinguishable in terms of the following characteristics,
which determine the product price level and the suitability for
various end-use applications:
|
|
|
|
|
nickel content and purity level: (i) intermediates with
various levels of nickel content, (ii) nickel pig iron has
1.5-6% nickel, (iii) ferro-nickel has
20-40%
nickel, (iv) standard LME grade nickel has a minimum of
99.8% nickel, and (v) high purity nickel has a minimum of
99.9% nickel and does not contain specific elemental impurities;
|
|
|
|
shape (such as pellets, discs, squares, strips, and foams); and
|
|
|
|
size.
|
In 2008, the principal end-use applications for nickel were:
|
|
|
|
|
austenitic stainless steel
(55-60% of
global nickel consumption);
|
|
|
|
non-ferrous alloys, alloy steels, and foundry applications
(20-25% of
global nickel consumption);
|
|
|
|
nickel plating (10% of global nickel consumption); and
|
|
|
|
specialty applications, such as batteries, fuel cells, powder
metallurgy and automotive parts (5-10% of global nickel
consumption).
|
In 2008, 67% of our refined nickel sales were made into
non-stainless steel applications, compared to the industry
average for primary nickel producers of approximately 12%. As a
result of our focus on such higher-
36
value segments, our average realized nickel prices for refined
nickel have consistently exceeded LME cash nickel prices.
We offer sales and technical support to our customers on a
global basis. We have a well-established global marketing
network for finished nickel, based at our head office in
Toronto, Canada. We also have sales offices in Saddle Brook, New
Jersey, and San Antonio, Texas in the United States, in
London, England, in Tokyo, Japan, in Hong Kong and Shanghai,
China, in Kaohsiung, Taiwan, in Bangkok, Thailand and in
Bridgetown, Barbados.
2.1.5 Competitionnickel
The global nickel market is highly competitive. We believe that
our key competitive strengths include our long-life mines, our
low cash costs of production relative to other nickel producers,
and sophisticated exploration and processing technologies. Our
global marketing reach, diverse product mix, and technical
support direct our products to the applications and geographic
regions that offer the highest margins for our products.
In 2008, our nickel deliveries represented approximately 21% of
global consumption for primary nickel. In addition to us, the
largest suppliers in the nickel industry (each with its own
integrated facilities, including nickel mining, processing,
refining and marketing operations) are Mining and Metallurgical
Company Norilsk Nickel, BHP Billiton plc, Xstrata plc and
Jinchuan Nonferrous Metals Corporation. Together with us, these
companies accounted for about 61% of global finished primary
nickel production in 2008.
While stainless steel production is a major driver of global
nickel demand, stainless steel producers can use nickel products
with a wide range of nickel content, including secondary nickel
(scrap). The choice between primary and secondary nickel is
largely based on their relative prices and availability. In
recent years, secondary nickel has accounted for about
44-49% of
total nickel used for stainless steels, and primary nickel has
accounted for about
51-56%. In
2006, a new primary nickel product entered the market, known as
nickel pig iron. This is a low-grade nickel product made in
China from imported lateritic ores (primarily from the
Philippines, Indonesia and New Caledonia) that is suitable
primarily for use in stainless steel production. In 2008, nickel
pig iron production totaled an estimated 75,000 metric tons,
representing 5.4% of world primary nickel supply.
Competition in the nickel market is based primarily on quality,
reliability of supply and price. We believe our operations are
competitive in the nickel market because of the high quality of
our nickel products and our relatively low production costs.
Given the competitive advantages described above, we were able
to increase our sales in 2008 despite a decline in worldwide
demand of 1% from 2006 to 2007 and of 4% from 2007 to 2008. Our
global deliveries (including intermediates and purchased nickel)
increased, as a percentage of total deliveries in the global
nickel market, from 20% in 2006 to 21% in 2008.
37
2.2 Aluminum
We operate our aluminum businesses at the parent-company level
and through subsidiaries and joint ventures, as set forth in the
following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our share of capital
|
|
|
|
Company
|
|
Business
|
|
Voting
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Partners
|
|
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
|
|
Vale
|
|
Bauxite
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MRN
|
|
Bauxite
|
|
|
40.0
|
|
|
|
40.0
|
|
|
Alcan Participações Ltda.,
BHP Billiton Metais S.A.,
Companhia Brasileira de Alumínio,
Alcoa Alumínio S.A.,
Alcoa World Alumina Brasil
Participações Ltda. and
Norsk Hydro Brasil Ltda
|
Alunorte
|
|
Alumina
|
|
|
59.0
|
|
|
|
57.0
|
|
|
Hydro Aluminium Brasil Investment BV,
Companhia Brasileira de Alumínio,
Nippon Amazon Aluminium Co., Ltd,
Japan Alunorte Investment Co., Ltd,
Mitsui & Co., Ltd. and Mitsubishi Corporation
|
Albras
|
|
Aluminum
|
|
|
51.0
|
|
|
|
51.0
|
|
|
Nippon Amazon Aluminium Co., Ltd
|
Valesul
|
|
Aluminum
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
2.2.1 Bauxite
We conduct our bauxite operations through our joint venture
Mineração Rio do Norte S.A. (MRN) and at
the parent company level.
|
|
|
|
|
MRN. MRN, which is located in the northern
region of the Brazilian state of Pará, is one of the
largest bauxite operations in the world, operating four open-pit
bauxite mines that produce high quality bauxite. In addition,
MRN controls substantial additional high quality bauxite
resources. MRN also operates ore beneficiation facilities at its
mines, which are connected by rail to a loading terminal and
port facilities on the Trombetas River, a tributary of the
Amazon River, that can handle vessels of up to 60,000 deadweight
tons (DWT). MRN owns and operates the rail and the port
facilities serving its mines. The MRN mines are accessible by
road from the port area and obtain electricity from their own
thermal power plant.
|
|
|
|
Paragominas mine. Operations at our
Paragominas mine, in the Brazilian state of Pará, began in
the first quarter of 2007 to supply Alunortes alumina
refinery. The first expansion of Paragominas (Paragominas
II) was concluded in the second quarter of 2008. The mine
has a nominal annual production capacity of 9.9 million
metric tons of wet 12% moisture bauxite, and the bauxite quality
is similar to that of MRN. The Paragominas site has a
beneficiation plant with milling and a
244-kilometer
slurry pipeline. We obtain electricity from Eletronorte.
|
38
The following table sets forth information about ore production
at our mining sites.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production for the year ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Nominal
|
|
|
Recovery
|
|
Mine(1)
|
|
Type
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
capacity
|
|
|
rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(million metric tons)
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
MRN
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Almeidas
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
8.4
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aviso
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
12.0
|
|
|
|
14.4
|
|
|
|
14.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Saracá V
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Saracá W
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total MRN
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.2
|
|
|
|
24.8
|
|
|
|
24.2
|
|
|
|
25.1
|
|
|
|
72-75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paragominas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miltonia 3
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Paragominas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
These figures represent
run-of-mine
production.
|
The following table sets forth information about our final
bauxite production.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production for the year ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Nominal
|
|
Recovery
|
Mine
|
|
Type
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
capacity
|
|
rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
|
|
(million metric tons)
|
|
|
|
MRN
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
17.8
|
|
|
|
18.1
|
|
|
|
18.1
|
|
|
|
18.0
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
Paragominas
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
9.9
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
We are developing the Paragominas III bauxite project.
Paragominas III, which will increase production capacity by
4.95 million metric tons per year, has an estimated cost of
US$487 million. We intend to supply the first stage of a
new alumina refinery, Companhia de Alumina do Pará, with
production from Paragominas III. The project is scheduled for
completion in the second half of 2012.
We are engaged in greenfield exploration for bauxite in Brazil
and Guinea.
2.2.2 Alumina
We conduct our alumina operations in Brazil, through our
subsidiary AlunorteAlumina do Norte do Brasil S.A.
(Alunorte), which produces alumina by refining
bauxite supplied by MRN and the Paragominas mine. The Alunorte
plant is the largest alumina refinery in the world, with a
nominal production capacity of 6.3 million metric tons per
year, after the last expansion concluded in the second quarter
of 2008.
Alunorte sells alumina to our subsidiary
AlbrasAlumínio Brasileiro S.A. (Albras),
its principal customer, as well as to our subsidiary Valesul and
unaffiliated customers. Albras aluminum production
facilities are located nearby, in the city of Barcarena in the
state of Pará, and Alunorte and Albras share infrastructure
and other resources.
The following table sets forth information on our alumina
production.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production for the year ended December 31,
|
|
Nominal
|
Company
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
capacity
|
|
|
(million metric tons)
|
|
Alunorte
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
39
We are developing the Companhia de Alumina do Pará
(CAP) alumina project. The CAP refinery is 61% owned
by us, 20% by Hydro Aluminum S.A. and 19% by Dubai Aluminium
Company Limited (DUBAL). The initial production
capacity of this refinery, located in Barcarena, close to
Alunortes alumina refinery, will be 1.86 million
metric tons per year of alumina through two lines each of
930,000 tons per year. Future capacity expansions at this
refinery has the potential to reach up to 7.4 million
metric tons per year. The estimated total cost for the first
phase of CAP is US$2.200 billion. The start-up of the first
phase is scheduled for the end of 2012, subject to approval by
our Board of Directors and to market conditions.
2.2.3 Aluminum
We conduct our aluminum smelting operations in Brazil through
our subsidiaries Albras and Valesul Alumínio S.A.
(Valesul).
Albras. The Albras smelter, located in
Barcarena, in the state of Pará, is one of the largest
aluminum plants in the Americas, with a nominal capacity of
455,000 metric tons per year. Albras produces aluminum using
alumina supplied by Alunorte. Alunorte supplied 100% of
Albras alumina requirements in 2008. Albras produces pure
metal ingots.
Aluminum is produced from alumina by means of a continuous
electro-chemical process, which requires substantial amounts of
electricity. Albras purchases electric power from Eletronorte.
Eletronorte generates electricity at the Tucuruí
hydroelectric power plant located on the Tocantins River. This
plant is the sole source of electrical power in the region in
the quantities required for Albras operations. Albras
consumes approximately one-fifth of the non-peak period output
of the Tucuruí plant.
Valesul. Valesul operates a smelter located in
the state of Rio de Janeiro with a nominal capacity of 95,000
metric tons per year. Valesul produces primary aluminum and
aluminum alloys in the form of ingots and billets. Valesul
produces aluminum using alumina provided by Alunorte, which
supplied 53.6% of Valesuls alumina requirements in 2008
and the remaining 46.4% was supplied by external sources. In
2008, Valesul obtained 94% of its electrical energy requirements
from: (a) four wholly-owned small hydroelectric power
plants located in the state of Minas Gerais,
(b) Aimorés, in the state of Minas Gerais, in which
Valesul has a 51% stake as of March 2009, and (c) the
Machadinho hydroelectric power plant, in the state of Santa
Catarina, in which Valesul has a 8.29% stake. Its remaining
electrical energy requirements are obtained from unrelated
parties at market prices. The 51% stake in Aimorés is being
transferred back to Vale, pending approval from ANEEL, the
Brazilian electricity regulatory agency.
Valesul is engaged in litigation regarding the prices charged by
an electricity utility in the state of Rio de Janeiro for the
transmission of electricity. See Item 8. Financial
informationLegal proceedings. The following table sets
forth information on our aluminum and aluminum alloys production.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production for the year ended December 31,
|
|
|
Nominal
|
|
Company
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
capacity
|
|
|
|
(thousand metric tons)
|
|
|
Albras
|
|
|
456
|
|
|
|
455
|
|
|
|
455
|
|
|
|
455
|
|
Valesul(1)
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
551
|
|
|
|
551
|
|
|
|
543
|
|
|
|
540
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
In 2006, 2007 and 2008, Valesul
also recycled 13,000, 13,000 and 15,000 metric tons,
respectively, of aluminum scrap from unrelated parties.
|
2.2.4 Customers
and salesaluminum
Bauxite. MRN produces bauxite for sale on a
take-or-pay
basis to the joint venture partners. Excess production may be
sold to customers. The joint venture partners pay a price that
is determined by a formula linked to the price of aluminum for
three-month futures contracts on the London Metal Exchange and
to the
40
price of alumina FOB Australia. In 2008, our subsidiary Alunorte
purchased 64.7% of its bauxite requirements from MRN.
Paragominas sells all of its production to our subsidiary
Alunorte, which corresponds to 35.3% of its bauxite requirements
in 2008.
Alumina. Each Alunorte partner must purchase
on a
take-or-pay
basis all alumina produced by Alunorte in proportion to its
respective interest. The partners pay the same price, which is
determined by a formula based on the price of aluminum for
three-month futures contracts on the London Metal Exchange. We
usually use a portion of our share of Alunortes alumina
production to supply Albras and Valesul, and we sell the
remainder to customers in Argentina, Canada, Egypt, Norway, the
United States and other countries.
Aluminum. The Albras partners must purchase on
a
take-or-pay
basis all aluminum produced by Albras in proportion to their
ownership interests. We generally market our aluminum in the
global markets, mainly Asia and Europe, to clients in the
aluminum industry. Valesuls aluminum products are sold
primarily in the Brazilian market.
2.2.5 Competitionalumina
and aluminum
Alumina. The alumina market is competitive,
but small compared to the primary aluminum market, because many
of the major aluminum-producing companies have integrated
bauxite, alumina and aluminum operations. Competition in the
alumina market is based primarily on quality, reliability of
supply and price, which is directly related to lower costs and
logistics. We believe that Alunorte is competitive in the
alumina market because of the high quality of its alumina, its
advantages in scale and technology, lower conversion costs
relative to other refineries in the Atlantic, its efficient port
facilities, and the ongoing commitment of its shareholders to
purchase a substantial portion of its annual production to place
it both in Brazilian and other markets.
Aluminum. The global aluminum market is highly
competitive. The worlds largest producers are subsidiaries
and affiliates of Alcoa, Rusal, Rio Tinto, Chalco, Norsk Hydro
and BHP Billiton. As primary aluminum is a commodity,
competition in the aluminum market is based primarily on the
economics of transportation and the costs of production. We
believe that Albras is competitive in the global aluminum market
because of its relatively efficient and accessible port
facilities and its generally prevailing lower cost of production.
2.3 Copper
2.3.1 Operationscopper
We conduct our copper operations at the parent-company level in
Brazil and through our subsidiary Vale Inco in Canada.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our share of capital
|
Company
|
|
Location
|
|
Voting
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
Vale
|
|
|
Brazil
|
|
|
|
−
|
|
|
|
−
|
|
Vale Inco
|
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Brazilian
operations
Our Sossego copper mine in Carajás, in the state of
Pará, has two main copper ore bodies, Sossego and
Sequeirinho. Its annual operating capacity is 14 million
metric tons of
run-of-mine,
averaging 120,000 metric tons of copper contained in concentrate
(30% grade) and 104,000 ounces of gold in concentrate. The
copper ore is mined by open-pit method, and the
run-of-mine
is processed by means of standard primary crushing and
conveying, SAG milling (a semi-autogenous mill that uses a large
rotating drum filled with ore, water and steel grinding balls to
transform the ore into a fine slurry), ball milling, copper
concentrate flotation, tailings disposal, concentrate
thickening, filtration and load out. We truck the concentrate to
a storage terminal in
41
Parauapebas and then transport it via the EFC railroad to the
Ponta da Madeira maritime terminal in São Luís, in the
state of Maranhão.
We constructed an
85-kilometer
road to link Sossego to the Carajás air and rail facilities
and a power line that allows us to purchase electrical power at
market prices. We have a long-term energy supply contract with
Eletronorte.
In December 2008, we concluded the construction of the Usina
Hidrometalúrgica de Carajás plant (UHC),
located at the Sossego mining site, to test the application of
hydro-metallurgical technology for the industrial-scale
processing of more complex copper ores to produce copper
cathode. This plant uses copper concentrate from our Sossego
mine. It has an annual production capacity of 10,000 metric tons
of copper cathode. If proven to be efficient after the estimated
21-month
testing period, we believe this technology could be used to
process the sulfide ore produced at the mines in the
Carajás mineral province at a relatively low cost.
Canadian
operations
In Canada, we recover copper in conjunction with our nickel
operations, principally at Sudbury and Voiseys Bay. At
Sudbury, we produce two intermediate copper products, copper
concentrate and copper anodes, and we also produce electrowon
copper cathode as a by-product of our nickel refining
operations. At Voiseys Bay, we produce copper concentrates.
2.3.2 Productioncopper
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production for the year ended December 31,
|
|
|
Nominal
|
|
Mine
|
|
Type
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
capacity(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(thousand metric tons)
|
|
|
Brazil:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sossego
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
Canada:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sudbury
|
|
Underground
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
Voiseys Bay
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
Thompson
|
|
Underground
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
External(2)
|
|
−
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
267
|
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
|
312
|
|
|
|
309
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
These figures represent nominal
capacity in 2008, which is equivalent to planned production for
2008 (except for Sudbury and Voiseys Bay, for which
nominal capacity is equivalent to actual production for 2008).
|
|
(2)
|
|
We process copper at our facilities
using feed purchased from unrelated parties.
|
2.3.3 Projects
and explorationcopper
|
|
|
|
|
Tres Valles (formerly Papomono). We are
investing in the Tres Valles project in the Coquimbo region of
Chile, which has an estimated nominal production capacity of
18,000 metric tons per year of copper cathode. The estimated
total cost of the project is US$102 million. The completion
of this project is scheduled for the first half of 2010.
|
|
|
|
Salobo. In the first phase of development of
the Salobo copper deposit in Carajás, annual nominal
capacity will be 127,000 metric tons of copper in concentrates,
with 130,000 troy ounces of gold in concentrate as a by-product.
The concentrate will be processed using conventional smelting
technology. The total estimated cost for this project is
US$1.152 billion. Subject to market conditions, it is
scheduled to be completed by the first half of 2011.
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
Salobo expansion. The project will expand the
Salobo mines annual production capacity from 127,000 to
254,000 metric tons of copper in concentrates. The scope of the
project contemplates the expansion of the industrial and support
facilities, raising the height of the tailing dam and increasing
mine movement. The total estimated cost for this project is
US$855 million. Subject to market conditions, it is
scheduled to be completed by the second half of 2013.
|
|
|
|
Totten. The Totten nickel mine in Sudbury,
Ontario, is expected to produce 11,200 metric tons of copper per
year as a co-product of nickel production. Subject to market
conditions, completion is scheduled for the first half of 2011.
The estimated total cost of the project is US$362 million.
|
We are engaged in copper mineral exploration primarily in
Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Democratic Republic
of Congo, Kazakhstan, Mongolia, Peru and the Philippines.
2.3.4 Customers
and salescopper
Copper concentrates from Sossego are sold under medium- and
long-term contracts to copper smelters in South America, Europe
and Asia. We have a long-term off-take agreement to sell the
majority of copper concentrate from Salobo to smelters. Vale
Inco has long-term copper supply agreements with Xstrata Copper
Canada for the sale of copper anodes and copper concentrates
produced in Sudbury. Copper in concentrates from Voiseys
Bay are sold under medium-term contracts to customers in Europe.
Electrowon copper from Sudbury is sold in North America under
short-term sales agreements.
2.3.5 Competitioncopper
The global copper cathode market is highly competitive.
Producers are integrated mining companies and custom smelters,
covering all regions of the world, while consumers are
principally wire, rod and copper-alloy producers. Competition
occurs mainly on a regional level and is based primarily on
production costs, quality, reliability of supply and logistics
costs. The worlds largest copper cathode producers are
Codelco, Freeport, BHP Billiton and Xstrata, operating at the
parent-company level or through subsidiaries. Our participation
in the global copper cathode market is marginal.
Copper concentrate and copper anode are intermediary products in
the copper production chain. Both the concentrate and anode
markets are competitive, having numerous producers but fewer
participants and smaller volumes than in the copper cathode
market due to high levels of integration by the major copper
producers.
In the copper concentrate market, the main producers are mining
companies located in South America, Indonesia and Australia,
while consumers are custom smelters located in Europe and Asia.
Competition in the copper concentrate market occurs mainly on a
global level and is based on production costs, quality,
logistics costs and reliability of supply. The largest
competitors in the copper concentrate market are BHP Billiton,
Rio Tinto, Freeport and Xstrata, operating at the parent-company
level or through subsidiaries. Our market share in 2008 was
about 3% of the total custom copper concentrate market.
The copper anode/blister market has very limited trade within
the copper industry; generally, anodes are produced to supply
each companys integrated refinery. The trade in
anodes/blister is limited to those facilities that have more
smelting capacity than refining capacity or to those situations
where logistics cost savings provide an incentive to source
anodes from outside smelters. The largest competitors in the
copper anode market are Codelco, Anglo American and Xstrata,
operating at the parent-company level or through subsidiaries.
2.4 PGMs
and other precious metals
As by-products of our Sudbury nickel operations in Canada, we
recover significant quantities of platinum-group metals, as well
as small quantities of gold and silver. We operate a processing
facility in Port Colborne, Ontario, which produces PGMs, gold
and silver intermediate products. We have a refinery in Acton,
England, where we process our intermediate products, as well as
feeds purchased from unrelated parties and toll-refined
materials. In 2008, PGM concentrates from our Sudbury operations
supplied about 33% of our PGM
43
production. The remaining portion was supplied by feed from
unrelated parties (including purchased and toll-refined
materials). Vale Incos global marketing department sells
our own PGMs and other precious metals, as well as products from
unrelated parties and toll-refined products, on a sales agency
basis. The following table sets forth information on our
precious metals production.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nominal
|
|
Mine(1)
|
|
Type
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
capacity(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(thousand troy ounces)
|
|
|
Sudbury:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Platinum
|
|
|
Underground
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
Palladium
|
|
|
Underground
|
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
Gold
|
|
|
Underground
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Production figures exclude precious
metals purchased from unrelated parties and toll-refined
materials.
|
|
(2)
|
|
These figures represent nominal
capacity in 2008, which is equivalent to planned production for
2008, (except for palladium and gold, for which nominal capacity
is equivalent to actual production for 2008).
|
2.5 Other
non-ferrous minerals
2.5.1 Cobalt
We recover significant quantities of cobalt as a by-product of
our Canadian nickel operations. In 2008, we produced 1,472
metric tons of refined cobalt metal at our Port Colborne
refinery and 728 metric tons of cobalt hydrate at our Thompson
nickel operations in Canada. Our remaining cobalt production
consisted of 773 metric tons of cobalt contained in intermediate
products (such as nickel concentrates). We expect to increase
our production of cobalt as we increase nickel production in New
Caledonia at the Goro mine, because the nickel laterite ore at
this location contains significant co-deposits of cobalt.
We sell cobalt on a global basis. Our cobalt metal, which is
electro-refined at our Port Colborne refinery, has very high
purity levels (99.8%) and consequently commands a price premium
in the market. Cobalt metal is used in the production of various
alloys, particularly for aerospace applications, as well as the
manufacture of cobalt-based chemicals. Our cobalt hydrate is
used by chemical producers to make cobalt-based chemicals.
The following table sets forth information on our cobalt
production.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production for the year ended December 31,
|
|
|
Nominal
|
|
Mine
|
|
Type
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
capacity(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(metric tons)
|
|
|
Sudbury
|
|
Underground
|
|
|
665
|
|
|
|
727
|
|
|
|
804
|
|
|
|
1,003
|
|
Thompson
|
|
Underground
|
|
|
411
|
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
242
|
|
Voiseys Bay
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
680
|
|
|
|
1,239
|
|
|
|
1,695
|
|
|
|
1,695
|
|
External(2)
|
|
−
|
|
|
221
|
|
|
|
379
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
1,977
|
|
|
|
2,524
|
|
|
|
2,828
|
|
|
|
3,109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
These figures represent nominal
capacity in 2008, which is equivalent to planned production for
2008 (except for Voiseys Bay, for which nominal capacity
is equivalent to actual production for 2008).
|
|
(2)
|
|
These figures do not include
unrelated-party tolling of feeds purchased from unrelated
parties.
|
44
2.5.2 Kaolin
We conduct our kaolin business in Brazil, through the
subsidiaries set forth in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our share of capital
|
|
|
|
Company
|
|
Location
|
|
Voting
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Partners
|
|
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
|
|
CADAM
|
|
Vitória do Jari, Amapá
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
61.5
|
|
|
Banco do Brasil and BNDES
|
PPSA
|
|
Barcarena, Pará
|
|
|
85.6
|
|
|
|
86.2
|
|
|
Mitsubishi Corporation
|
CADAM S.A. (CADAM) and Pará Pigmentos S.A.
(PPSA) produce kaolin for paper coating. They also
conduct research into other uses for kaolin products in order to
develop a more diversified portfolio.
CADAM is located on the border of the states of Pará and
Amapá, in the Amazon area in northern Brazil. CADAMs
reserves are principally concentrated in the open-pit Morro do
Felipe mine, in Vitória do Jari, in the state of
Amapá. The beneficiation plant and private port facilities
are situated on the west bank of the Jari River, in Munguba, in
the state of Pará. CADAM produces the following products:
Amazon SB, Amazon Premium and Amazon Plus. They are sold mainly
in the European, Asian and Latin American markets.
PPSA operates an open-pit mine, Rio Capim, and a beneficiation
plant. These operations are linked to the land and port
facilities in Barcarena, via a
180-kilometer
pipeline. The beneficiated kaolin is pumped through a slurry
pipeline. PPSA produces the following products: Century, Century
S, Paraprint, Paraplate and Paralux. They are sold mainly in the
European, Asian and North American markets.
CADAM obtains electricity from its own thermal power plant,
whose nominal capacity is 22.5 MW. PPSA has an energy
supply contract with Rede Celpa.
The following table sets forth information on our kaolin
production.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production for the year ended December 31,
|
|
|
Nominal
|
|
|
Recovery
|
|
|
|
|
Mine
|
|
Type
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
capacity
|
|
|
rate(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(thousand metric tons)
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
CADAM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Morro do Felipe(2)
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
755
|
|
|
|
714
|
|
|
|
602
|
|
|
|
645
|
|
|
|
48.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
PPSA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rio Capim
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
597
|
|
|
|
639
|
|
|
|
528
|
|
|
|
672
|
|
|
|
28.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,352
|
|
|
|
1,354
|
|
|
|
1,129
|
|
|
|
1,317
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Total recovery rate.
|
|
(2)
|
|
The reduction in nominal capacity
was due to deactivation of the lump production line.
|
2.5.3 Potash
We conduct potash operations in Brazil at the parent-company
level. We lease the only potash mine in Brazil (in Rosario do
Catete, in the state of Sergipe) from
PetrobrasPetróleo Brasileiro S.A., the Brazilian
state-owned oil company. The lease, signed in 1991, became
effective in 1992 for a period of 25 years. All sales from
the Taquari-Vassouras mine are to the Brazilian market. The
following table sets forth information on our potash production.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production for the year ended December 31,
|
|
Nominal
|
|
Recovery
|
Mine
|
|
Type
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
capacity
|
|
rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
|
|
(thousand metric tons)
|
|
|
|
Taquari-Vassouras
|
|
|
Underground
|
|
|
|
731
|
|
|
|
671
|
|
|
|
607
|
|
|
|
850
|
|
|
|
87.8
|
|
45
2.5.4 Projectsother
non-ferrous minerals
We are developing the Bayovar project, in Bayovar, Peru, which
consists of an open-pit phosphate mine with nominal production
capacity of 3.9 million metric tons per year and a maritime
terminal. Completion is expected in the second half of 2010. The
estimated total cost of this project is US$479 million.
We are engaged in potash mineral exploration in Argentina,
Brazil and Canada and in phosphate mineral exploration in
Brazil, Mozambique and Peru.
3.1 Operationscoal
We produce thermal and metallurgical coal through our subsidiary
Vale Australia, which operates coal assets in Australia through
wholly-owned companies and unincorporated joint ventures, and we
have minority interest in two Chinese companies, Henan Longyu
Energy Resources Co., Ltd. (Longyu) and Shandong
Yankuang International Coking Company Ltd.
(Yankuang), as set forth in the following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our share
|
|
|
Company
|
|
Business
|
|
Location
|
|
of capital
|
|
Partners
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
|
Vale Australia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Integra Coal
|
|
Thermal and metallurgical coal
|
|
Hunter Valley, New South Wales
|
|
|
61.2
|
|
|
NSC, JFE, Posco, Toyota
|
Carborough Downs
|
|
Metallurgical coal
|
|
Bowen Basin, Queensland
|
|
|
80.0
|
|
|
NSC, JFE, Posco, Tata
|
Isaac Plains
|
|
Thermal and metallurgical coal
|
|
Bowen Basin, Queensland
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
|
Aquila
|
Broadlea
|
|
Thermal and metallurgical coal
|
|
Bowen Basin, Queensland
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
China:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Longyu
|
|
Coal and other related products
|
|
Henan Province
|
|
|
25.0
|
|
|
Yongcheng Coal & Electricity
(Group) Co. Ltd., Shanghai Baosteel
International Economic & Trading Co., Ltd. and other
minority shareholders
|
Yankuang
|
|
Metallurgical coke and methanol
|
|
Shandong Province
|
|
|
25.0
|
|
|
Yankuang Group Co. Limited, Itochu Corporation
|
Integra Coal Operations (underground and
open-cut). The Integra Coal Operations are
located 10 kilometers north-west of Singleton in the Hunter
Valley of New South Wales. The operations comprise an
underground coal mine that produces coal by longwall methods,
and an open-cut pit. Coal from the mine is processed at a coal
handling and processing plant (CHPP) with a capacity
of 1,200 metric tons per hour, loaded onto trains at a
purpose-built rail loadout facility for transport to the Port of
Newcastle.
Carborough Downs. Carborough Downs is located
in the Central Bowen Basin in central Queensland, approximately
15 kilometers east of the township of Moranbah and approximately
180 kilometers southwest of the coastal city of Mackay.
Carborough Downs mining leases overlie the Rangal Coal Measures
of the Bowen Basin with the economic seams of Leichardt and
Vermont. Both seams have coking properties and can be
beneficiated to produce coking and PCI products. Carborough
Downs coal is processed at the Carborough Downs CHPP, which is
capable of processing 500 metric tons per hour, and which
operates seven days per week. The product is loaded onto trains
at a rail loadout facility and transported 160 kilometers to the
Dalrymple Bay Coal Terminal.
46
Isaac Plains. The Isaac Plains open-cut mine
is located close to Carborough Downs in central Queensland. The
mine is managed by Isaac Plains Coal Management on behalf of the
joint venture parties. The coal is classified as a medium
volatile bituminous coal with low ash and sulfur contents. Isaac
Plains product split is 75% metallurgical coal and 25%
thermal coal. Coal is processed at the Isaac Plains CHPP and
railed 172 kilometers to the Dalrymple Bay Coal Terminal.
Broadlea. Broadlea is an open-cut operation
located just north of Carborough Downss underground mine,
consisting of a collection of small economic coal deposits.
Broadlea is mined using the
truck-and-shovel
method, and product coal is toll-washed at the Carborough Downs
CHPP and railed 172 kilometers to the Dalrymple Bay Coal
Terminal.
3.2 Productioncoal
The following table sets forth information on our coal
production.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production for the year ended December 31,(1)
|
|
Joint venture
|
|
Mine type
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
(thousand metric tons)
|
|
|
Thermal coal:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Integra Coal(2)
|
|
Opencut
|
|
|
255
|
|
|
|
557
|
|
Isaac Plains(3)
|
|
Opencut
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
Broadlea
|
|
Opencut
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
582
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total thermal coal
|
|
|
|
|
440
|
|
|
|
1,286
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Metallurgical coal:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Integra Coal(2)
|
|
Underground and opencut
|
|
|
1,214
|
|
|
|
1,747
|
|
Isaac Plains(3)
|
|
Opencut
|
|
|
249
|
|
|
|
382
|
|
Carborough Downs(4)
|
|
Underground
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
429
|
|
Broadlea
|
|
Opencut
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
249
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total metallurgical coal
|
|
|
|
|
1,764
|
|
|
|
2,808
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
We acquired AMCI HA, the previous
owner of these mines, in April 2007. 2007 figures include
production from May to December 2007.
|
|
(2)
|
|
We own 61.2% of Integra Coal and
these figures relate to our equity.
|
|
(3)
|
|
We own 50% of Isaac Plains and
these figures relate to our equity.
|
|
(4)
|
|
We own 80% of Carborough Downs and
these figures relate to our equity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joint venture
|
|
Mine type
|
|
Nominal capacity
|
|
|
|
|
|
(million metric tons)
|
|
|
Integra Coal(1)
|
|
Underground and opencut
|
|
|
2.75
|
|
Isaac Plains(2)
|
|
Opencut
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
Carborough Downs(3)
|
|
Underground
|
|
|
3.84
|
|
Broadlea
|
|
Opencut
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
8.79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
We own 61.2% of Integra Coal and
these figures relate to our equity.
|
|
(2)
|
|
We own 50% of Isaac Plains and
these figures relate to our equity.
|
|
(3)
|
|
We own 80% of Carborough Downs and
these figures relate to our equity.
|
Longyu has annual production capacity of 5.85 million
metric tons of coal and other related products, and Yankuang, a
metallurgical coke plant, has annual production capacity of
2.0 million metric tons of coke and 200,000 metric tons of
methanol.
3.3 Projects
and explorationcoal
|
|
|
|
|
Moatize. We have obtained all of the required
licenses from the Mozambique government for the construction of
the Moatize mine, which will have nominal production capacity of
11 million metric tons per year, of which 8.5 million
metric tons per year will be metallurgical coal and
2.5 million
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
metric tons per year will be thermal coal. In 2008, we signed a
memorandum of understanding with the government of Mozambique
establishing a railroad tariff. The port construction is subject
to a bidding process. The estimated total cost of this project
is US$1.322 billion, and
start-up is
expected in the second half of 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carborough Downs. This project will increase
the nominal capacity of the Carborough Downs mine to
4.8 million metric tons per year. The longwall operations
are scheduled to start in the second half of 2009. Meanwhile,
the mine is producing up to 1.0 million metric tons per
year via continuous miners in the development of gate roads and
inventory of longwall panels. The project requires an estimated
total investment of US$330 million.
|
We are currently seeking opportunities for greenfield mineral
exploration for coal in Australia, Brazil, Colombia, Mongolia
and Mozambique.
3.4 Customers
and salescoal
Our coal sales are primarily focused in East Asia. In 2008, 43%
of our coal sales were made to Japanese steel mills and power
utilities. We also sell coal to customers in South Korea, India,
Taiwan, China, Pakistan and Brazil. In 2008, our Chinese coal
joint ventures directed their sales mainly to the Chinese
domestic market.
Our Integra Operations in New South Wales are similar to many
Hunter Valley operations in that the vast majority of production
is consumed in Japan, and the remaining amounts are delivered to
Korea and Taiwan. Our Queensland operations commenced production
in late 2006. Aided by a strong market for metallurgical coal,
we were able to market various types of coal from our Carborough
Downs, Broadlea and Isaac Plains mines in a number of target
markets, predominantly those mentioned above, as well as a trial
shipment to Germany.
3.5 Competitioncoal
The global coal industry, which is primarily comprised of the
markets for hard coal (metallurgical coal and thermal coal) and
brown coal/lignite, is highly competitive. Growth in steel
demand, especially in Asia, may underpin strong demand for
metallurgical coal. Major port (and often rail) constraints in
some of the countries in which major suppliers are located could
lead to limited availability of incremental metallurgical coal
production.
The global seaborne thermal coal market has significantly
expanded in recent years. Growth in thermal coal demand is
closely related to growth in electricity consumption, which will
continue to be driven by global economic growth, particularly
from emerging markets economies. Large existing fleets of
coal-fired power plants with long life cycles take decades to
replace or upgrade, keeping the share of thermal coal in the
electricity matrix very high in countries with high consumption.
The cost of fuel is typically the largest variable cost involved
in electricity generation and coal is currently the most
competitively priced fossil fuel for this purpose.
Competition in the coal industry is based primarily on the
economics of production costs, coal quality and transportation
costs. We believe that our operations and project pipeline are
competitive, and our key competitive strengths include the
strategic geographic location of our current and future supply
bases and our production cash costs relative to several other
coal producers.
Major participants in the coal seaborne market are subsidiares
and affiliates of Xstrata plc, BHP Billiton plc, PT Bumi
Resources Tbk., Anglo Coal, Drummond Company, Inc., Rio Tinto
Ltd., Teck Cominco, Peabody and the Shenhua Group.
48
4.1 Logistics
We have developed our logistics business based on the
transportation needs of our mining operations, mainly iron ore,
and it also provides transportation services for customers
products and for passengers. We conduct logistics businesses at
the parent-company level, through subsidiaries and through joint
ventures, as set forth in the following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our share of capital
|
|
|
Company
|
|
Business
|
|
Location
|
|
Voting
|
|
Total
|
|
Partners
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
|
Vale
|
|
Railroad (EFVM, EFC, FNS), port and maritime terminal operations
|
|
Brazil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FCA
|
|
Railroad operations
|
|
Brazil
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
99.9
|
|
|
Former employees of Rede Ferroviária Federal S.A.
|
MRS
|
|
Railroad operations
|
|
Brazil
|
|
|
37.9
|
|
|
|
41.5
|
|
|
CSN, Usiminas and Gerdau
|
CPBS
|
|
Port and maritime terminal operations
|
|
Brazil
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
Log-In
|
|
Port and maritime terminal operations and shipping activities
|
|
Brazil
|
|
|
31.3
|
|
|
|
31.3
|
|
|
Mitsui & Co. and several institutional investors
|
PT Inco
|
|
Port and maritime terminal operations
|
|
Indonesia
|
|
|
61.0
|
|
|
|
61.0
|
|
|
Sumitomo and several institutional investors
|
4.1.1 Railroads
Vitória a Minas railroad
(EFVM). The EFVM railroad links our
Southeastern System mines in the Iron Quadrangle region in the
Brazilian state of Minas Gerais to the Tubarão Port, in
Vitória, in the Brazilian state of Espírito Santo. We
operate this
905-kilometer
railroad under a
30-year
renewable concession, which expires in 2027. The EFVM railroad
consists of two lines of track extending for a distance of 601
kilometers to permit continuous railroad travel in opposite
directions, and single-track branches of 304 kilometers.
Industrial manufacturers are located in this area and major
agricultural regions are also accessible to it. The EFVM
railroad has a daily capacity of 342,000 metric tons of iron
ore. In 2008, the EFVM railroad carried a total of
75.8 billion ntk of iron ore and other cargo, of which
17.3 billion ntk, or 23%, consisted of cargo transported
for customers, including iron ore for Brazilian customers. The
EFVM railroad also carried approximately 1 million
passengers in 2008. In 2008, we had a fleet of 326 locomotives
and 19,743 wagons at EFVM.
Carajás railroad (EFC). We
operate the EFC railroad under a
30-year
renewable concession, which expires in 2027. This railroad,
located in the Northern System, starts at our Carajás iron
ore mines in the Brazilian state of Pará, and extends 892
kilometers to our Ponta da Madeira maritime terminal complex
facilities located near the São Luís Port in the
Brazilian state of Maranhão. The EFC railroad consists of
one line of track, with crossing yards and turnouts to permit
the passage of trains in opposite directions. The EFC railroad
has a daily capacity of 301,000 metric tons of iron ore. In
2008, the EFC railroad carried a total of 88.7 billion ntk
of iron ore and other cargo. In 2008, the EFC railroad
transported a total of 6.4 billion ntk of cargo for
customers, including iron ore for Brazilian customers. The EFC
railroad also carried approximately 330,000 passengers in 2008.
The main cargo of the EFC railroad consists of iron ore,
principally carried for us. In 2008, we had a fleet of 211
locomotives and 12,084 wagons at EFC. In May 2008, we began
operations of the largest capacity train in Latin America. This
train has 330 cars, measures 3.4 kilometers and weighs
42,300 gross metric tons when loaded.
Ferrovia Centro-Atlântica
(FCA). Our subsidiary FCA operates
the central-east regional railway network of the Brazilian
national railway system under a
30-year
renewable concession, which expires in 2026. The central east
network has approximately 8,023 kilometers of track extending
into the states of Sergipe, Bahia, Espírito Santo, Minas
Gerais, Rio de Janeiro and Goiás and Brasília, the
Federal District of Brazil. It connects with our EFVM railroad
near the cities of Belo Horizonte, in the state of Minas Gerais
and Vitória, in the state of Espírito Santo. FCA
operates on the same track gauge as our EFVM railroad and
49
provides access to the Santos Port in the state of São
Paulo. In 2008, the FCA railroad transported a total of
11.3 billion ntk of cargo for customers. In 2008, FCA had a
fleet of 495 locomotives and 11,881 wagons.
Ferrovia Norte-Sul railroad
(FNS). In October 2007, we won the
auction for the subconcession for commercial operation for
30 years of a
720-kilometer
segment of the FNS railroad, in Brazil. Since 1989, we have
operated a segment of the FNS, which connects to the EFC
railroad, enabling access to the port of Itaqui, in São
Luís, where our Ponta da Madeira maritime terminal is
located. A
452-kilometer
extension was concluded in December 2008. A state-owned company
is required to complete a new
268-kilometer
segment by December 2009. In 2008, the FNS railroad transported
a total of 0.9 billion ntk of cargo for customers. This new
railroad creates a new corridor for the transportation of
general cargo, mainly for the export of soybeans, rice and corn
produced in the center-northern region of Brazil. In 2008, FNS
had a fleet of six locomotives and 370 wagons.
The principal items of cargo of the EFVM, EFC, FCA and FNS
railroads are:
|
|
|
|
|
iron ore and iron ore pellets, carried for us and customers;
|
|
|
|
steel, coal, pig iron, limestone and other raw materials carried
for customers with steel mills located along the railroad;
|
|
|
|
agricultural products, such as soybeans, soybean meal and
fertilizers; and
|
|
|
|
other general cargo, such as building materials, pulp, fuel and
chemical products.
|
We charge market prices for customer freight, including iron ore
pellets originating from joint ventures and other enterprises in
which we do not have a 100% equity interest. Market prices vary
based on the distance traveled, the type of product transported
and the weight of the freight in question, and are regulated by
the Brazilian transportation regulatory agency, ANTT
(Agência Nacional de Transportes Terrestres).
MRS Logística S.A. (MRS). The
MRS railroad is 1,643 kilometers long and links the Brazilian
states of Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo and Minas Gerais. In
2008, the MRS railroad carried a total of 55.5 billion ntk
of cargo, including 32.4 billion nkt of iron ore and other
cargo from Vale.
4.1.2 Ports
and maritime terminals
Brazil
We operate a port and six maritime terminals principally as a
means to complete the delivery of our iron ore and iron ore
pellets to bulk carrier vessels serving the seaborne market. See
Item 4. Information on the companyLines of
businessFerrous mineralsOperationsIron ore
pellets. We also use our port and terminals to handle
customers cargo. In 2008, 10.8% of the cargo handled by
our port and terminals represented cargo handled for customers.
Tubarão Port. The Tubarão Port,
which covers an area of approximately 18 square kilometers,
is located near the Vitória Port in the Brazilian state of
Espírito Santo and contains four maritime terminals:
(i) the iron ore maritime terminal, (ii) Praia Mole
Terminal, (iii) Terminal de Produtos Diversos, and
(iv) Terminal de Granéis Líquidos.
|
|
|
|
|
The iron ore maritime terminal has two
piers. Pier I can accommodate two vessels at a
time, one of up to 170,000 DWT on the southern side and one of
up to 200,000 DWT on the northern side. Pier II can
accommodate one vessel of up to 365,000 DWT at a time, limited
at 20 meters draft plus tide. In Pier I there are two ship
loaders, which can load up to a combined total of 14,000 metric
tons per hour. In Pier II there are two ship loaders that
work alternately and can each load up to 16,000 metric tons per
hour. In 2008, 93.9 million metric tons of iron ore and
iron ore pellets were shipped through the terminal for us. The
iron ore maritime terminal has a stockyard capacity of
2.8 million metric tons.
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
Praia Mole terminal is principally a coal terminal and handled
13.6 million metric tons in 2008. See Item 8.
Financial informationLegal proceedingsPraia Mole
suit.
|
|
|
|
Terminal de Produtos Diversos handled 5.3 million metric
tons of grains and fertilizers in 2008.
|
|
|
|
Terminal de Granéis Líquidos handled 1.1 million
metric tons of bulk liquid in 2008.
|
Ponta da Madeira maritime terminal. The Ponta
da Madeira maritime terminal is located near the Itaqui Port in
the Brazilian state of Maranhão. The terminal facilities
can accommodate three vessels. Pier I can accommodate vessels
displacing up to 420,000 DWT. Pier II can accommodate
vessels of up to 155,000 DWT. Pier I has a maximum loading rate
of 16,000 tons per hour. Pier II has a maximum loading rate
of 8,000 tons per hour. Pier III, which has two berths and three
shiploaders, can accommodate vessels of up to 220,000 DWT and
has a maximum loading rate of 8,000 metric tons per hour in each
shiploader. Cargo shipped through our Ponta da Madeira maritime
terminal consists principally of our own iron ore production.
Other cargo includes manganese ore, copper concentrate and pig
iron produced by us and pig iron and soybeans for unrelated
parties. In 2008, 85.7 million metric tons were handled
through the terminal for us and 6.0 million metric tons for
customers. The Ponta da Madeira maritime terminal has a
stockyard capacity of 5.4 million metric tons.
Itaguaí maritime terminal Cia.
Portuária Baía de Sepetiba (CPBS).
CPBS is a wholly-owned subsidiary that operates the Itaguaí
terminal, in the Sepetiba Port, in the Brazilian state of Rio de
Janeiro. Itaguaís maritime terminal has a pier that
allows the loading of ships up to 18.1 meters and up to 230,000
DWT. In 2008, the terminal uploaded approximately
22.8 million metric tons of iron ore. From December 2007 to
February 2008, Itaguaí operated with limited capacity as a
result of an accident with a ship in the terminal.
Guaíba Island maritime terminal. We
operate a maritime terminal on Guaíba Island in the
Sepetiba Bay, in the Brazilian state of Rio de Janeiro. The iron
ore terminal has a pier that allows the loading of ships of up
to 300,000 DWT. In 2008, the terminal uploaded approximately
40.6 million metric tons of iron ore.
Inácio Barbosa maritime terminal
(TMIB). We operate the Inácio
Barbosa maritime terminal, located in the Brazilian state of
Sergipe. The terminal is owned by Petrobras. Vale and Petrobras
entered into an agreement in December 2002, which allows Vale to
operate this terminal for a period of 10 years. In 2008,
1.1 metric tons of fuel and agricultural and steel products were
shipped through TMIB.
Indonesia
PT Inco owns and operates two ports in Indonesia to support its
nickel mining activities.
|
|
|
|
|
The Balantang Special Port is located in Balantang Village,
South Sulawesi, and has a pier that can accommodate vessels
displacing up to 6,000 DWT.
|
|
|
|
The Harapan Tanjung Mangkasa Village is located in Harapan
Tanjung Mangkasa Village, South Sulawesi, and has a pier that
can accommodate vessels displacing up to 39,000 DWT.
|
51
4.1.3 Shipping
We operate in two distinct shipping areas: seaborne dry bulk
shipping and tug boat services. The following table sets forth
information on the volume of cargo that our seaborne dry bulk
shipping service carried for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(thousand metric tons)
|
|
|
Iron ore:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vale
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
1,324
|
|
|
|
1,884
|
|
Customers
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coal
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
2,243
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2,551
|
|
|
|
1,471
|
|
|
|
1,884
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We operate three capesize vessels, which have been fully
dedicated to perform shuttle services from Brazil to China since
May 2007. We have entered into long-term freight contracts, are
building 12 large ore carriers, each with a capacity of 400,000
DWT, and have bought four used capesize vessels to develop a
dedicated shuttle service from Brazil to China using these
vessels. We expect this service to enhance our ability to offer
our products in the Chinese market at competitive prices and to
increase our market share in China and the global seaborne
market.
We have also entered into a long-term freight contracts to
transport pellet feed from Brazil to Oman, where we are building
a pelletizing plant with nominal capacity of 9 million
metric tons of direct reduction iron ore pellets per year and a
distribution center with capacity to handle 40 million tons
of iron ore or iron ore pellets.
We conduct our intermodal shipping business through Log-In.
Log-In offers port handling and container transportation
services, by sea or rail, as well as container storage. It has a
fleet of seven ships for coastal shipping, a container terminal
(Terminal Vila Velha, or TVV) and two multimodal
terminals. In 2008, Log-Ins coastal shipping service
transported 119,918 twenty-foot equivalent units (teus), TVV
handled 283,660 teus and its express train service moved 45,202
teus.
We also operate a fleet of 24 tug boats (13 owned and 11
chartered) in maritime terminals in Brazil, in Vitória
(state of Espírito Santo), Trombetas (state of Pará),
São Luís (state of Maranhão) and Aracaju (state
of Sergipe).
4.1.4 Projectslogistics
|
|
|
|
|
Southeastern Corridor project. We are
investing in the EFVM railroad and Tubarão Port in order to
increase our logistics capacity in our Southeastern System for
iron ore. The estimated total cost is US$553 million, and
the conclusion of the project is scheduled for the second half
of 2009.
|
|
|
|
Litorânea Sul railroad. The
Litorânea Sul railroad will be
165-kilometers
long and will serve the Anchieta Industrial complex and a new
port to be built in Ubu, both in the Brazilian state of
Espírito Santo. This project is still subject to board
approval. The estimated total cost of this project is
US$935 million. Its conclusion has been preliminarily
scheduled for the first half of 2012.
|
4.2 Energy
4.2.1 Operationsenergy
We have developed our energy assets based on the current and
projected energy needs of our mining operations, with the goal
of reducing our energy costs and minimizing the risk of energy
shortages.
52
Brazil
Energy management and efficient supply in Brazil are priorities
for us, given the uncertainties associated with changes in the
regulatory environment, and the risk of rising electricity
prices and electric energy shortages (as experienced in Brazil
in the second half of 2001). We currently have seven
hydroelectric power plants in operation. In 2008, our total
energy capacity in Brazil was 4.152 GWh. We use the electricity
produced by these plants for our internal needs. As a large
consumer of electricity, we expect that investing in power
projects will help us reduce costs and will protect us against
energy price volatility. However, we may experience delays in
the construction of certain generation projects due to
environmental and regulatory issues, which may lead to higher
costs.
Canada
In 2008, our wholly-owned and operated hydroelectric power
plants in Sudbury generated 19.1% of the electricity
requirements of our Sudbury operations. The power plants consist
of five separate generation stations with an installed generator
nameplate capacity of approximately 56 MW. The output of
the plants is limited by water availability, as well as
constraints imposed by a water management plan regulated by the
provincial government. Over the course of 2008, the power system
operator distributed electrical energy at the rate of
approximately 211.5 MW to all surface plants and mines in
the Sudbury area.
In 2008, diesel generation generated 100% of the electric
requirements of our Voiseys Bay operations. We have six
diesel generators
on-site, of
which normally only four are in operation, producing
approximately 25 MW.
Indonesia
Energy costs are a significant component of our nickel
production costs for the processing of lateritic ores at our PT
Inco operations in Indonesia. A major portion of PT Incos
electric furnace power requirements are supplied at low-cost by
its two hydroelectric power plants on the Larona River:
(i) the Larona plant, which generates an average of
165 MW, and (ii) the Balambano plant, which generates
an average of 110 MW. PT Inco has thermal generating
facilities which include 24 cat-type diesel generators, with
capacity of 1 MW each, five Mirless Black diesel generators
being converted from diesel to fuel oil, and one oil burning
steam turbine generator. These generators have the capacity to
provide 80 MW of power. Since October 2008, all thermal
facilities have been shut down in order to reduce operational
costs.
4.2.2 Projectsenergy
We are developing the following energy projects:
|
|
|
|
|
Barcarena thermal power plant. We plan to
start the construction of a coal-fired thermal power plant in
Brazil with 600 MW of capacity in the second half of 2009,
subject to obtaining required environmental licenses. Completion
is scheduled for the second half of 2011. Our estimated total
investment in the project is US$898 million.
|
|
|
|
Estreito hydroelectric power plant. In the
second half of 2007, we began construction of the Estreito
hydroelectric power plant, located on the Tocantins River, on
the border of the Brazilian states of Maranhão and
Tocantins. The plant will have an installed capacity of
1,087 MW. Completion is targeted for the second half of
2010. We have a 30% stake in the consortium that will build and
operate the plant. Our estimated share of the total investment
is US$514 million.
|
|
|
|
Karebbe hydroelectric power plant. Karebbe
will be the third hydroelectric power plant built by PT Inco in
Sulawesi, Indonesia. It is intended to reduce production costs
and to produce enough energy to enable the potential expansion
of production to 90,000 metric tons per year of nickel in matte.
The estimated total cost is US$410 million, and
start-up is
scheduled for the first half of 2011.
|
53
We also hold 58.08% of a consortium that has a concession to
build the Santa Isabel hydroelectric power plant on the Araguia
River in Brazil. We continue our efforts to obtain the necessary
environmental licenses to begin construction.
We are participating, through joint ventures, in natural gas
exploration efforts in Brazil. Currently, we have minority
stakes in 16 consortiums to explore natural gas in 26 blocks
located in Espírito Santo, Pará-Maranhão,
Parnaíba and Santos Basins. We aim to use any natural gas
discovered to meet our energy needs. We expect at least three
exploration wells to be drilled during 2009.
5.1 Steel
We have ownership interest in a steel company, as set forth in
the following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our share of capital
|
Company
|
|
Location
|
|
Voting
|
|
Total
|
|
Partners
|
|
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
|
CSI
|
|
California, United States
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
|
JFE Steel
|
California Steel Industries (CSI) is a flat-rolled
steel producer located in the United States. It produces
approximately 1.8 million metric tons of flat steel per
year.
We are developing the following steel projects in order to
create additional demand for our iron ore and iron ore pellets:
|
|
|
|
|
ThyssenKrupp-CSASiderúrgica do Atlântico
Ltda. We have a minority stake in an integrated
steel slab plant in the Brazilian state of Rio de Janeiro, which
is currently under construction. Our total investment will be
US$630 million, corresponding to a 10% stake in the joint
venture.
Start-up is
scheduled for the first half of 2010.
|
|
|
|
Companhia Siderúrgica de Pecém
(CSP). In November 2007, we signed a
memorandum of understanding with Dongkuk Steel Mill Co.
(Dongkuk), one of the largest steel producers in
South Korea, for the construction of a steel slab plant in
the Brazilian state of Ceará with initial production
capacity of 2.5 million metric tons per year with the
possibility for expansion to 5 million metric tons per
year. In April 2008, we signed a new memorandum of understanding
with Dongkuk and JFE Steel Corporation (JFE) to
conduct a feasibility study to analyze the construction of a
larger steel slab plant, with initial production capacity of 5
to 6 million metric tons per year. Depending on the outcome
of the feasibility study, JFE will either participate in the
project as a majority shareholder or not at all. In the former
case, we expect our stake in CSPs capital to be no more
than 20%. In the latter case, we and Dongkuk will construct the
plant as contemplated in the November 2007 memorandum of
understanding and, in such case, we expect our stake in
CSPs capital to be 40%. This project is subject to board
approval, and our total investment has not yet been determined.
|
|
|
|
Marabá. We are conducting a feasibility
study for the construction of a steel plant in Marabá, in
the Brazilian state of Pará. The plant would have
production capacity of 2.5 million metric tons per year of
semi-finished steel and would entail an estimated investment of
US$3.3 billion.
Start-up of
this project, which is subject to board approval, would be in
2013.
|
|
|
|
Companhia Siderúrgica de Vitória
(CSV). We are acquiring the interest
of our former joint venture partner Baosteel Group Corporation
in CSV, which was established to construct an integrated steel
slab plant Brazil. We are renaming CSV Companhia
Siderúrgica de Ubu (CSU). CSU is expected to
have initial production capacity of 5 million metric tons
per year and will undertake the conceptual engineering studies
and licensing process. However, in the event the project is
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
implemented, we expect to find a majority partner and retain
only a 20% stake. This project is subject to board approval, and
our total investment has not yet been determined.
|
RESERVES
Presentation
of information concerning reserves
The estimates of proven and probable ore reserves at our mines
and projects and the estimates of mine life included in this
annual report have been prepared by our staff of experienced
geologists and engineers, unless otherwise stated, and
calculated in accordance with the technical definitions required
by the SEC. Under the SECs Industry Guide 7:
|
|
|
|
|
Reserves are the part of a mineral deposit that could be
economically and legally extracted or produced at the time of
the reserve determination.
|
|
|
|
Proven (measured) reserves are reserves for which
(a) quantity is computed from dimensions revealed in
outcrops, trenches, working or drill holes; grade
and/or
quality are computed from the results of detailed sampling and
(b) the sites for inspection, sampling and measurement are
spaced so closely and the geologic character is so well defined
that size, shape, depth and mineral content of reserves are
well-established.
|
|
|
|
Probable (indicated) reserves are reserves for which quantity
and grade
and/or
quality are computed from information similar to that used for
proven (measured) reserves, but the sites for inspection,
sampling and measurement are farther apart or are otherwise less
adequately spaced. The degree of assurance, although lower than
that for proven (measured) reserves, is high enough to assume
continuity between points of observation.
|
We periodically revise our reserve estimates when we have new
geological data, economic assumptions or mining plans. During
2008, we performed an analysis of our reserve estimates for
certain projects, which is reflected in new estimates as of
December 31, 2008. Reserve estimates for each operation are
for 100% of the operation and assume that we either have or will
obtain all of the necessary rights to mine, extract and process
ore reserves at each mine. Where we own less than 100% of the
operation, reserve estimates have not been adjusted to reflect
our ownership interest. Certain figures in the tables,
discussions and notes have been rounded. For a description of
risks relating to reserves and reserve estimates, see
Item 3. Key informationRisk factors.
Iron ore
reserves
In preparing iron ore reserve data, we used price assumptions
that did not exceed the following three-year (2006 to
2008) historical average prices for iron ore:
|
|
|
|
|
US$0.9675 per Fe unit for Southeastern System fines; and
|
|
|
|
US$1.0088 per Fe unit for Carajás fines.
|
55
Our iron ore reserve estimates are of in-place material after
adjustments for mining depletion, with no adjustments made for
metal losses due to processing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iron oreSoutheastern System mines(1)
|
|
|
|
Proven
|
|
|
Probable
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Itabira complex
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conceição
|
|
|
321.1
|
|
|
|
51.4
|
|
|
|
28.0
|
|
|
|
58.9
|
|
|
|
349.1
|
|
|
|
52.0
|
|
Minas do Meio
|
|
|
344.7
|
|
|
|
53.7
|
|
|
|
176.9
|
|
|
|
56.1
|
|
|
|
521.7
|
|
|
|
54.5
|
|
Centrais complex
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Água Limpa/Cururu
|
|
|
46.5
|
|
|
|
41.8
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
|
|
42.2
|
|
|
|
52.8
|
|
|
|
41.8
|
|
Gongo Soco
|
|
|
54.2
|
|
|
|
64.6
|
|
|
|
20.2
|
|
|
|
58.6
|
|
|
|
74.4
|
|
|
|
63.0
|
|
Brucutu
|
|
|
295.0
|
|
|
|
52.3
|
|
|
|
364.2
|
|
|
|
50.1
|
|
|
|
659.2
|
|
|
|
51.1
|
|
Baú
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37.1
|
|
|
|
55.7
|
|
|
|
37.1
|
|
|
|
55.7
|
|
Apolo(2)
|
|
|
145.2
|
|
|
|
60.3
|
|
|
|
133.5
|
|
|
|
56.2
|
|
|
|
278.7
|
|
|
|
58.3
|
|
Andrade
|
|
|
106.8
|
|
|
|
59.7
|
|
|
|
14.1
|
|
|
|
54.8
|
|
|
|
120.9
|
|
|
|
59.2
|
|
Mariana complex
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alegria
|
|
|
185.2
|
|
|
|
50.2
|
|
|
|
55.7
|
|
|
|
48.1
|
|
|
|
240.8
|
|
|
|
49.7
|
|
Fábrica Nova
|
|
|
511.3
|
|
|
|
47.0
|
|
|
|
351.4
|
|
|
|
44.2
|
|
|
|
862.6
|
|
|
|
45.8
|
|
Fazendão
|
|
|
251.5
|
|
|
|
50.1
|
|
|
|
94.5
|
|
|
|
49.7
|
|
|
|
346.0
|
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
Timbopeba
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73.3
|
|
|
|
55.2
|
|
|
|
73.3
|
|
|
|
55.2
|
|
Urucum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mina de Ferro
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
|
|
62.7
|
|
|
|
29.5
|
|
|
|
62.1
|
|
|
|
37.5
|
|
|
|
62.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Southeastern System
|
|
|
2,269.6
|
|
|
|
51.7
|
|
|
|
1,384.6
|
|
|
|
50.8
|
|
|
|
3,654.2
|
|
|
|
51.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Tonnage is stated in millions of
metric tons of wet run-of-mine. Grade is % of Fe. Approximate
drill hole spacings used to classify the reserves were: 100m x
100m to proven reserves and 200m x 200m to probable reserves.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Formerly Maquiné.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iron oreSoutheastern System mines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type
|
|
|
Operating since
|
|
|
exhaustion date
|
|
|
Vale interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
Itabira complex
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conceição
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
1957
|
|
|
|
2023
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Minas do Meio
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
1976
|
|
|
|
2023
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Centrais complex
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Água Limpa/Cururu
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
2000
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
Gongo Soco
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
2000
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Brucutu
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
1994
|
|
|
|
2027
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Baú
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2029
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Apolo
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2029
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Andrade(1)
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
2027
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Mariana complex
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alegria
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
2000
|
|
|
|
2029
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Fábrica Nova
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
2023
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Fazendão
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
1976
|
|
|
|
2032
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Timbopeba
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
1984
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Urucum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mina de Ferro
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
1994
|
|
|
|
2023
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
We entered into a
40-year
contract with Companhia Siderúrgica Belgo-Mineira to lease
the Andrade mine.
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iron oreSouthern System mines(1)(2)
|
|
|
|
Proven
|
|
|
Probable
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Minas Itabiritos complex
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segredo/João Pereira
|
|
|
404.0
|
|
|
|
46.1
|
|
|
|
472.0
|
|
|
|
43.8
|
|
|
|
876.0
|
|
|
|
44.9
|
|
Sapecado(3)
|
|
|
109.2
|
|
|
|
52.8
|
|
|
|
145.2
|
|
|
|
53.5
|
|
|
|
254.4
|
|
|
|
53.2
|
|
Galinheiro(3)
|
|
|
132.0
|
|
|
|
54.7
|
|
|
|
191.6
|
|
|
|
54.1
|
|
|
|
323.6
|
|
|
|
54.3
|
|
Vargem Grande complex
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tamanduá
|
|
|
305.9
|
|
|
|
56.6
|
|
|
|
210.1
|
|
|
|
51.5
|
|
|
|
516.0
|
|
|
|
54.5
|
|
Capitão do Mato
|
|
|
227.1
|
|
|
|
56.2
|
|
|
|
598.7
|
|
|
|
50.4
|
|
|
|
825.8
|
|
|
|
52.0
|
|
Abóboras
|
|
|
269.5
|
|
|
|
46.8
|
|
|
|
181.5
|
|
|
|
43.8
|
|
|
|
450.9
|
|
|
|
45.6
|
|
Paraopeba complex
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jangada
|
|
|
45.6
|
|
|
|
66.6
|
|
|
|
15.7
|
|
|
|
66.2
|
|
|
|
61.3
|
|
|
|
66.5
|
|
Córrego do Feijão
|
|
|
31.5
|
|
|
|
67.0
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
63.1
|
|
|
|
35.0
|
|
|
|
66.6
|
|
Capão Xavier
|
|
|
92.6
|
|
|
|
65.1
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
|
|
64.4
|
|
|
|
103.0
|
|
|
|
65.0
|
|
Mar Azul
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26.6
|
|
|
|
55.9
|
|
|
|
26.6
|
|
|
|
55.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Southern System
|
|
|
1,617.4
|
|
|
|
52.9
|
|
|
|
1,855.2
|
|
|
|
49.1
|
|
|
|
3,472.6
|
|
|
|
50.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Tonnage is stated in millions of
metric tons of wet run-of-mine. Grade is % of Fe. Approximate
drill hole spacings used to classify the reserves were: 100m x
100m to proven reserves and 200m x 200m to probable reserves.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Mines formerly categorized as part
of the MBR System are now included in the Southern System.
|
|
(3)
|
|
The Galinheiro reserves were
separated from the Sapecado reserves and include the Pico
reserves.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iron oreSouthern System mines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
Projected
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type
|
|
|
since
|
|
|
exhaustion date
|
|
|
Vale interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
Minas Itabiritos complex
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segredo/João Pereira
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
2040
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Sapecado
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
1942
|
|
|
|
2030
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Galinheiro
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
1942
|
|
|
|
2030
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Vargem Grande complex
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tamanduá
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
1993
|
|
|
|
2040
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Capitão do Mato
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
1997
|
|
|
|
2050
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Abóboras
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
2040
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Paraopeba complex
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jangada
|
|
|
Open Pit
|
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Córrego do Feijão
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Capão Xavier
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
2021
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Mar Azul
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iron oreNorthern System mines(1)
|
|
|
|
Proven
|
|
|
Probable
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Serra Norte complex
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N4W
|
|
|
1,284.0
|
|
|
|
66.5
|
|
|
|
285.7
|
|
|
|
66.1
|
|
|
|
1,569.7
|
|
|
|
66.5
|
|
N4E
|
|
|
331.5
|
|
|
|
66.5
|
|
|
|
96.2
|
|
|
|
66.0
|
|
|
|
427.7
|
|
|
|
66.4
|
|
N5-W
|
|
|
51.1
|
|
|
|
66.5
|
|
|
|
187.2
|
|
|
|
66.1
|
|
|
|
238.3
|
|
|
|
66.2
|
|
N5E(2)
|
|
|
344.6
|
|
|
|
67.4
|
|
|
|
321.2
|
|
|
|
67.3
|
|
|
|
665.8
|
|
|
|
67.4
|
|
Serra Sul
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S11
|
|
|
3,045.8
|
|
|
|
66.8
|
|
|
|
1,193.7
|
|
|
|
66.7
|
|
|
|
4,239.6
|
|
|
|
66.8
|
|
Serra Leste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SL1
|
|
|
55.7
|
|
|
|
66.2
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
66.4
|
|
|
|
60.9
|
|
|
|
66.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Northern System
|
|
|
5,112.7
|
|
|
|
66.7
|
|
|
|
2,089.3
|
|
|
|
66.6
|
|
|
|
7,202.0
|
|
|
|
66.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Tonnage is stated in millions of
metric tons of wet run-of-mine. Grade is % of Fe. Approximate
drill hole spacings used to classify the reserves are: 200m x
150m to proven reserves and 300m x 200m to probable reserves,
except SL1 which is 100m x 100m to proven reserves and 200m x
200m to probable reserves.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Reserves previously classified
under N5E-N and N5S were incorporated in the N5E reserve model.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iron oreNorthern System mines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
exhaustion
|
|
|
Vale
|
|
|
|
Type
|
|
|
since
|
|
|
date
|
|
|
interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
Serra Norte
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N4W
|
|
|
Open Pit
|
|
|
|
1994
|
|
|
|
2031
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
N4E
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
1984
|
|
|
|
2025
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
N5-W
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
1998
|
|
|
|
2023
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
N5E
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
1998
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Serra Sul
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S11
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2059
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Serra Leste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SL1
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2039
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iron oreTotal reserves for all systems(1)
|
|
|
|
Proven
|
|
|
Probable
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Total Southeastern System
|
|
|
2,269.6
|
|
|
|
51.7
|
|
|
|
1,384.6
|
|
|
|
50.8
|
|
|
|
3,654.2
|
|
|
|
51.4
|
|
Total Southern System
|
|
|
1,617.4
|
|
|
|
52.9
|
|
|
|
1,855.2
|
|
|
|
49.1
|
|
|
|
3,472.6
|
|
|
|
50.9
|
|
Total Northern System
|
|
|
5,112.7
|
|
|
|
66.7
|
|
|
|
2,089.3
|
|
|
|
66.6
|
|
|
|
7,202.0
|
|
|
|
66.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Vale
|
|
|
8,999.7
|
|
|
|
60.5
|
|
|
|
5,329.1
|
|
|
|
56.4
|
|
|
|
14,328.8
|
|
|
|
59.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Tonnage is stated in millions of
metric tons of wet run-of-mine. Grade is % of Fe.
|
Changes
in iron ore reserves: 2008 versus 2007
Our iron ore reserve estimates increased from 7,267.8 to
14,328.8 million metric tons. The increase mainly reflects
(i) the inclusion of the huge reserves of S11, part of the
Serra Sul deposit in Carajás, (ii) the expansion of
the N4W reserves into a continuous body to the south of the
deposit, and (iii) the inclusion of the low-grade itabirite
reserves for the Vargem Grande complex (the Tamanduá,
Capitão do Mato and Abóboras mines). All of these
deposits have been intensively drilled over the past four years,
and the related projects (Serra Sul, Carajás 130 Mt, and
Vargem Grande (formerly Itabiritos)) are now in feasibility or
pre-feasibility stages. Moreover, our reserve estimates for
Segredo/João Pereira increased due to the expansion of the
open-pit project, which was undertaken in order to include
low-grade materials, that will be used to feed a new
concentration plant. Changes in the other reserves reflect
mining production during the year and small changes in new
updated geological models
and/or pit
designs and reserve classifications.
58
Manganese
ore reserves
In preparing manganese reserve data, we used price assumptions
that did not exceed the three-year (2006 to
2008) historical average price for manganese of US$349.50
per metric ton (published by Ryans Notes). We have
adjusted ore reserve estimates for extraction losses and
metallurgical recoveries during extraction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manganese ore reserves(1)
|
|
|
|
Proven
|
|
|
Probable
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Azul
|
|
|
35.5
|
|
|
|
35.7
|
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
|
|
33.3
|
|
|
|
42.6
|
|
|
|
35.2
|
|
Urucum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
|
|
44.4
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
|
|
44.4
|
|
Morro da Mina
|
|
|
9.2
|
|
|
|
24.3
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
|
|
24.3
|
|
|
|
15.3
|
|
|
|
24.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
44.7
|
|
|
|
33.4
|
|
|
|
20.3
|
|
|
|
34.4
|
|
|
|
64.9
|
|
|
|
33.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Tonnage is stated in millions of
metric tons of wet run-of-mine. Grade is % of Mn.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manganese ore mines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type
|
|
Operating since
|
|
|
exhaustion date
|
|
|
Vale interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
Azul
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
1985
|
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Urucum
|
|
Underground
|
|
|
1976
|
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Morro da Mina
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
1902
|
|
|
|
2045
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Changes
in manganese ore reserves: 2008 versus 2007
Our manganese ore reserve estimates increased from 58.6 to
64.9 million metric tons in 2008, due to revision of the
ultimate pit in Morro da Mina and Azul Mine. The economic
assumptions were updated based on a three-year average price
revision for both mines, the removal of some physical
restrictions at Morro da Mina (relocation of the mineral
processing plant occurred in 2008) and a revised cut-off
grade for the Azul mine based on new market product
specifications. During 2009, we are performing an analysis of
our manganese ore reserve estimates and new exploration
drilling, which will be reflected in comprehensive new estimates
as of December 31, 2009.
Nickel
ore reserves
In preparing nickel reserve data, we used price assumptions that
did not exceed the three-year (2006 to 2008) historical
average LME spot price for nickel of US$27,297 per metric ton.
Our nickel reserve estimates are of in-place material after
adjustments for mining depletion and mining losses (or screening
and drying in the cases of Sulawesi and Goro) and recoveries,
with no adjustments made for metal losses due to processing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nickel ore reserves(1)
|
|
|
|
Proven
|
|
|
Probable
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sudbury
|
|
|
75.6
|
|
|
|
1.20
|
|
|
|
74.8
|
|
|
|
1.14
|
|
|
|
150.4
|
|
|
|
1.17
|
|
Thompson
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
|
|
1.94
|
|
|
|
14.4
|
|
|
|
1.67
|
|
|
|
24.5
|
|
|
|
1.78
|
|
Voiseys Bay
|
|
|
23.0
|
|
|
|
3.03
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
0.68
|
|
|
|
26.0
|
|
|
|
2.76
|
|
Indonesia(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sulawesi
|
|
|
88.7
|
|
|
|
1.81
|
|
|
|
64.0
|
|
|
|
1.72
|
|
|
|
152.7
|
|
|
|
1.77
|
|
New Caledonia(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goro
|
|
|
100.8
|
|
|
|
1.35
|
|
|
|
23.5
|
|
|
|
1.91
|
|
|
|
124.3
|
|
|
|
1.46
|
|
Brazil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Onça Puma
|
|
|
55.1
|
|
|
|
1.79
|
|
|
|
27.6
|
|
|
|
1.62
|
|
|
|
82.7
|
|
|
|
1.73
|
|
Vermelho
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
353.3
|
|
|
|
1.63
|
|
|
|
207.2
|
|
|
|
1.50
|
|
|
|
560.6
|
|
|
|
1.58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Tonnage is stated in millions of
dry metric tons. Grade is % of nickel.
|
|
(2)
|
|
We have rights to other properties
in Indonesia, New Caledonia and in other locations, which have
not yet been fully explored.
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nickel ore mines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type
|
|
Operating since
|
|
|
exhaustion date
|
|
|
Vale interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sudbury
|
|
Underground
|
|
|
1885
|
|
|
|
2042
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Thompson
|
|
Underground
|
|
|
1960
|
|
|
|
2021
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Voiseys Bay
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Indonesia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sulawesi
|
|
Open cast
|
|
|
1978
|
|
|
|
2037
|
|
|
|
61.0
|
|
New Caledonia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goro
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2036
|
|
|
|
74.0
|
|
Brazil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Onça Puma
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2039
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Changes
in nickel ore reserves: 2008 versus 2007
Reserves at our Sudbury operations decreased from 160.3 to
150.4 million metric tons, after mining depletion, while
nickel grades remained similar. The change was essentially due
to reclassification of mineral reserves to mineral resources at
Stobie Mine and at the non-operating Blezzard deposit, which was
partially offset by exploration additions and re-evaluations at
our operating mines.
Reserves at our Thompson operations remained stable at
24.5 million metric tons. Mining depletion was partially
offset by ore reserve additions resulting from exploration and
mine plan re-evaluations. The estimated average nickel grade
declined by 2%.
Reserves at our Voiseys Bay operations decreased from 28.9
to 26.0 million metric tons, primarily due to mining
depletion and a copper grade increase caused by a reduction of
the mining internal dilution rate. This reduction is supported
by the reconciliation of three years of production data with the
life-of-mine plan estimates.
Reserves at Sulawesi decreased from 160.9 to 152.7 million
metric tons, after adjustments for mining depletion, changes in
plant feed chemistry operational targets and the reassessment of
ore quantity estimates on steep slopes. These adjustments were
partially offset by additional drilling that converted mineral
resources to reserves.
Reserves at Goro increased from 120.0 to 124.3 million
metric tons after consideration of additional drilling, feed,
preparation attrition revisions and a more accurate
interpolation of ore and waste interfaces.
Reserves at Onça Puma remained unchanged from 2007
estimates, since no production activities occurred in 2008.
Reserves at Vermelho, which we reported last year, have been
downgraded to mineral resources as a result of a review underway
to change the plant flowsheet design in order to reduce capital
expenditures and operational costs. As a result, the
projects technical and economic viability cannot be
demonstrated.
Bauxite
ore reserves
In preparing bauxite reserve data, we used price assumptions
that did not exceed the three-year (2006 to
2008) historical average realized sales price for bauxite
of US$30.56 per metric ton. We have adjusted ore reserve
estimates for mass recoveries during washing, bone dry.
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bauxite ore reserves(1)
|
|
|
|
Proven
|
|
|
Probable
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
MRN
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Almeidas
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
50.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
50.2
|
|
Aviso
|
|
|
22.1
|
|
|
|
51.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.1
|
|
|
|
51.2
|
|
Bacaba
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
|
53.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
|
53.5
|
|
Saracá V
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
47.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
47.9
|
|
Saracá W
|
|
|
11.7
|
|
|
|
49.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.7
|
|
|
|
49.8
|
|
Bela Cruz
|
|
|
45.1
|
|
|
|
52.1
|
|
|
|
22.2
|
|
|
|
51.6
|
|
|
|
67.3
|
|
|
|
52.1
|
|
Cipó
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
49.8
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
49.8
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
|
|
49.8
|
|
Teófilo
|
|
|
27.9
|
|
|
|
50.1
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
|
|
49.4
|
|
|
|
33.2
|
|
|
|
50.1
|
|
Aramã
|
|
|
8.6
|
|
|
|
49.8
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
49.1
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
49.8
|
|
Greigh
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
48.9
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
48.8
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
48.8
|
|
Monte Branco
|
|
|
16.9
|
|
|
|
49.0
|
|
|
|
24.3
|
|
|
|
49.1
|
|
|
|
41.2
|
|
|
|
48.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total MRN
|
|
|
146.8
|
|
|
|
50.8
|
|
|
|
58.5
|
|
|
|
50.1
|
|
|
|
205.4
|
|
|
|
50.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paragominas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miltonia 3
|
|
|
141.0
|
|
|
|
49.4
|
|
|
|
55.4
|
|
|
|
49.4
|
|
|
|
196.4
|
|
|
|
49.4
|
|
Miltonia 5
|
|
|
95.7
|
|
|
|
47.3
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
47.3
|
|
|
|
98.6
|
|
|
|
47.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Paragominas
|
|
|
236.7
|
|
|
|
48.6
|
|
|
|
58.3
|
|
|
|
49.3
|
|
|
|
295.0
|
|
|
|
48.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Tonnage is stated in millions of
metric tons of washed product (bone dry). Grade is % of
Al2O3.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bauxite ore mines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type
|
|
|
Operating since
|
|
|
exhaustion date
|
|
|
Vale interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
MRN
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Almeidas
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
40.0
|
|
Aviso
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
40.0
|
|
Bacaba
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
40.0
|
|
Saracá V
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
1979
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
40.0
|
|
Saracá W
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
40.0
|
|
Bela Cruz
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
40.0
|
|
Cipó
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023
|
|
|
|
40.0
|
|
Teófilo
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023
|
|
|
|
40.0
|
|
Aramã
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
40.0
|
|
Greigh
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
40.0
|
|
Monte Branco
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
|
40.0
|
|
Paragominas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miltonia 3
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2032
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Miltonia 5
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2032
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Changes
in bauxite ore reserves: 2008 versus 2007
MRNs bauxite reserves increased from 164.9 to
205.4 million metric tons, primarily due to research and
valuation of new mining areas in 2008.
Paragominas bauxite reserves decreased from 299.9 to
295.0 million metric tons, primarily due to mining
depletion. The mine contains 692,000 metric tons of stockpiled
material that was taken into account in the reserve calculations.
Copper
ore reserves
In preparing copper reserve data, we used price assumptions that
did not exceed the three-year (2006 to 2008) historical
average LME spot price for copper of US$6,977 per metric ton.
Our copper reserve estimates
61
are of in-place material after adjustments for mining depletion
and mining losses and recoveries, with no adjustments made for
metal losses due to processing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copper ore reserves(1)
|
|
|
|
Proven
|
|
|
Probable
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sudbury
|
|
|
75.6
|
|
|
|
1.43
|
|
|
|
74.8
|
|
|
|
1.27
|
|
|
|
150.4
|
|
|
|
1.35
|
|
Thompson
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
|
|
0.13
|
|
|
|
14.4
|
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
|
|
24.5
|
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
Voiseys Bay
|
|
|
23.0
|
|
|
|
1.78
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
0.38
|
|
|
|
26.0
|
|
|
|
1.62
|
|
Brazil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sossego
|
|
|
124.6
|
|
|
|
1.00
|
|
|
|
41.9
|
|
|
|
0.91
|
|
|
|
166.5
|
|
|
|
0.93
|
|
Salobo
|
|
|
508.2
|
|
|
|
0.80
|
|
|
|
420.3
|
|
|
|
0.74
|
|
|
|
928.5
|
|
|
|
0.77
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
741.5
|
|
|
|
0.92
|
|
|
|
554.4
|
|
|
|
0.81
|
|
|
|
1,295.9
|
|
|
|
0.86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Tonnage is stated in millions of
metric tons of dry run-of-mine. Grade is % of copper.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copper ore mines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type
|
|
Operating since
|
|
|
exhaustion date
|
|
|
Vale interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sudbury
|
|
Underground
|
|
|
1885
|
|
|
|
2042
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Thompson
|
|
Underground
|
|
|
1960
|
|
|
|
2021
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Voiseys Bay
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Brazil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sossego
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
2021
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Salobo
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2030
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Changes
in copper ore reserves: 2008 versus 2007
Our copper ore reserve estimates for our Canadian operations
decreased from 213 to 201 million metric tons for the
reasons discussed in connection with nickel reserves above.
Reserves at Sossego decreased from 181.8 to 166.5 million
metric tons, primarily reflecting mining depletion, and a review
of pit optimization with an updated economic model with
increased operational costs.
Reserves at Salobo were unchanged from 2007 estimates, at
928.5 million metric tons, because no production activities
occurred in 2008.
Reserves at 118, which we reported last year, have been
downgraded to mineral resources as a result of delays in
environmental licensing and the decision to evaluate the
resources of sulfide copper ore in addition to the previously
analyzed resources of oxide copper ore.
Cobalt
ore reserves
We expect to recover significant quantities of cobalt as a
by-product of our Canadian operations and from the Goro project.
Our cobalt reserve estimates are of in-place material after
adjustments for mining depletion and mining losses (or screening
and drying in the case of Goro) and recoveries, with no
adjustments made for metal losses due to processing.
62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cobalt ore reserves(1)
|
|
|
|
Proven
|
|
|
Probable
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sudbury
|
|
|
75.6
|
|
|
|
0.04
|
|
|
|
74.8
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
150.4
|
|
|
|
0.04
|
|
Voiseys Bay
|
|
|
23.0
|
|
|
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
26.0
|
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
New Caledonia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goro
|
|
|
100.8
|
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
|
|
23.5
|
|
|
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
124.3
|
|
|
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
199.4
|
|
|
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
101.3
|
|
|
|
0.04
|
|
|
|
300.7
|
|
|
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Tonnage is stated in millions of
metric tons. Grade is % of cobalt.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cobalt ore mines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type
|
|
Operating since
|
|
|
exhaustion date
|
|
|
Vale interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sudbury
|
|
Underground
|
|
|
1885
|
|
|
|
2042
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Voiseys Bay
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
New Caledonia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goro
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2036
|
|
|
|
74.0
|
|
Changes
in cobalt ore reserves: 2008 versus 2007
Our cobalt reserve estimates changed from 2007 to 2008 for the
reasons discussed in connection with nickel reserves above.
PGMs and
other precious metals reserves
We expect to recover significant quantities of precious metals
as by-products of our Canadian operations and from the Salobo
project. Our reserve estimates are of in-place material after
adjustments for mining depletion and mining losses and
recoveries, with no adjustments made for metal losses due to
processing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Precious metals reserves(1)
|
|
|
|
Proven
|
|
|
Probable
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sudbury
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Platinum
|
|
|
75.6
|
|
|
|
0.60
|
|
|
|
74.8
|
|
|
|
0.90
|
|
|
|
150.4
|
|
|
|
0.70
|
|
Palladium
|
|
|
75.6
|
|
|
|
0.80
|
|
|
|
74.8
|
|
|
|
1.10
|
|
|
|
150.4
|
|
|
|
0.90
|
|
Gold
|
|
|
75.6
|
|
|
|
0.30
|
|
|
|
74.8
|
|
|
|
0.40
|
|
|
|
150.4
|
|
|
|
0.30
|
|
Brazil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sossego
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gold
|
|
|
124.6
|
|
|
|
0.28
|
|
|
|
41.9
|
|
|
|
0.24
|
|
|
|
166.5
|
|
|
|
0.27
|
|
Salobo
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gold
|
|
|
508.2
|
|
|
|
0.50
|
|
|
|
420.3
|
|
|
|
0.40
|
|
|
|
928.5
|
|
|
|
0.46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TotalGold
|
|
|
708.4
|
|
|
|
0.44
|
|
|
|
537.0
|
|
|
|
0.39
|
|
|
|
1,245.4
|
|
|
|
0.42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Tonnage is stated in millions of
dry metric tons. Grade is grams per dry metric ton.
|
63
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Precious metals mines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type
|
|
Operating since
|
|
|
exhaustion date
|
|
|
Vale interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sudbury
|
|
Underground
|
|
|
1885
|
|
|
|
2042
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Brazil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sossego
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
2021
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Salobo
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2030
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Changes
in PGMs and other precious metals reserves: 2008 versus
2007
The decrease in our platinum, palladium and gold reserve
estimates from 2007 to 2008 for the Canadian operations was due
to the reasons discussed in connection with nickel reserves
above.
Kaolin
ore reserves
In preparing kaolin reserve data, we used price assumptions that
did not exceed the three-year (2006 to 2008) historical
average realized sales price for kaolin of US$184.91 per metric
ton. Our reserve estimates are of in-place material after
adjustments for mining depletion and mining losses and
recoveries, with no adjustments made for metal losses due to
processing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kaolin ore reserves(1)
|
|
|
|
Proven
|
|
|
Probable
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Brightness
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Brightness
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Brightness
|
|
|
Morro do Felipe
|
|
|
9.6
|
|
|
|
86.7
|
|
|
|
23.1
|
|
|
|
86.8
|
|
|
|
32.7
|
|
|
|
86.7
|
|
Rio Capim
|
|
|
34.8
|
|
|
|
82.5
|
|
|
|
8.6
|
|
|
|
81.9
|
|
|
|
43.5
|
|
|
|
82.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
44.5
|
|
|
|
84.6
|
|
|
|
31.7
|
|
|
|
84.4
|
|
|
|
76.2
|
|
|
|
84.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Tonnage is stated in millions of
metric tons. Brightness is stated in percentage terms.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kaolin ore mines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type
|
|
Operating since
|
|
|
exhaustion date
|
|
|
Vale interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
Morro do Felipe
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
1976
|
|
|
|
2030
|
|
|
|
86.2
|
|
Rio Capim
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
1996
|
|
|
|
2030
|
|
|
|
61.5
|
|
Changes
in kaolin ore reserves: 2008 versus 2007
Reserves at Morro do Felipe decreased from 34.1 to
32.7 million metric tons, primarily reflecting mining
depletion in 2008 and, to a lesser extent, a reduction in
estimates to reflect differences between actual recoveries and
amounts predicted by our reserve model.
Reserves at Rio Capim increased from 29.1 to 43.5 million
metric tons due to the increase in the number of holes and the
development of a new three-dimensional geological model.
During 2009, we are performing an analysis of our kaolin ore
reserve estimates, which will be reflected in comprehensive new
estimates as of December 31, 2009.
Potash
ore reserves
In preparing potash reserve data, we used price assumptions that
did not exceed the three-year (2006 to 2008) historical
average realized sales price for potash of US$350.12 per metric
ton. Our reserve estimates are of in-place material after
adjustments for mining depletion and mining losses and
recoveries, with no adjustments made for metal losses due to
processing.
64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potash ore reserves(1)
|
|
|
|
Proven
|
|
|
Probable
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Taquari-Vassouras
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
28.0
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
28.0
|
|
|
|
9.8
|
|
|
|
28.0
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Tonnage is stated in millions of
dry metric tons. Grade is % of KCI.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potash ore mine
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type
|
|
Operating since
|
|
|
exhaustion date
|
|
|
Vale interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
Taquari-Vassouras(1)
|
|
Underground
|
|
|
1986
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
We have a
25-year
lease contract, which was signed in 1991, with Petrobras.
|
Changes
in potash ore reserves: 2008 versus 2007
Our potash reserves decreased from 12.9 to 9.8 million
metric tons, mainly reflecting mining depletion in 2008.
Phosphate
reserves
In preparing phosphate reserve data, we used price assumptions
that did not exceed the three year (2006 to
2008) historical average benchmarking prices for phosphate
concentrate of US$153.5 per metric ton (published by
CRUFertilizer Week). Our reserve estimates are of in-place
material after adjustments for mining depletion, mining losses
and recoveries, with no adjustments made for metal losses due to
processing. The year 2008 is the first year for which we have
reported phosphate reserves.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phosphate reserves(1)
|
|
|
|
Proven
|
|
|
Probable
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Bayovar
|
|
|
245.4
|
|
|
|
17.1
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
15.0
|
|
|
|
247.5
|
|
|
|
17.1
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Tonnage is stated in millions of
dry metric tons. Grade is % of
P2O5.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phosphate ore mine
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type
|
|
Operating since
|
|
|
exhaustion date
|
|
|
Vale interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
Bayovar
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2037
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Coal
reserves
In preparing coal reserve data, we used price assumptions that
did not exceed the following (2006 to 2008) historical
average prices (realized sales and benchmarking prices) for coal:
|
|
|
|
|
US$104.87 per metric ton of hard metallurgical coal;
|
|
|
|
US$65.66 per metric ton of pulverized coal injection
(PCI); and
|
|
|
|
US$53.11 per metric ton of thermal coal.
|
Our coal reserve estimates are of in-place material after
adjustments for mining depletion, in-situ moisture content,
anticipated mining losses and dilution, but excluding any
adjustment for losses associated with beneficiation of raw coal
mined to meet saleable product requirements. Our coal reserve
estimates were prepared by the following independent
consultants: Mr. Colin Coxhead (Integra Coal), SRK
Consulting (Carborough Downs), MB Mining Consultants and
Hoskings Resource Management (Isaac Plains), and Snowden Mining
Industry Consultants Pty Ltd (Moatize).
65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coal ore reserves(1)
|
|
|
|
Coal type
|
|
Proven
|
|
Probable
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
(tonnage)
|
|
(tonnage)
|
|
(calorific value)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Integra Coal:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South Opencut
|
|
Metallurgical
and thermal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28.5 (thermal)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Middle Liddell Seam
|
|
Metallurgical
|
|
|
1
|
.2
|
|
|
14
|
.6
|
|
|
15
|
.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Barret and Hebden Seam
|
|
Metallurgical
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North Opencut
|
|
Metallurgical
and thermal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28.5 (thermal)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Integra Coal
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
.2
|
|
|
14
|
.6
|
|
|
15
|
.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carborough Downs
|
|
Metallurgical
and PCI
|
|
|
41
|
.2
|
|
|
5
|
.0
|
|
|
46
|
.2
|
|
|
31.7 (PCI)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Isaac Plains
|
|
Metallurgical,
|
|
|
22
|
.8
|
|
|
0
|
.9
|
|
|
23
|
.7
|
|
|
31.0 (PCI);
|
|
|
|
PCI and thermal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27.8 (thermal)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Broadlea
|
|
Metallurgical
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moatize
|
|
Metallurgical
|
|
|
422
|
|
|
|
416
|
|
|
|
838
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
487
|
.2
|
|
|
436
|
.5
|
|
|
923
|
.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Tonnage is stated in millions of
dry metric tons. Calorific value is stated in Mj/kg and refers
to the quality of marketable coal, quoted on a gross air
dried basis. Calorific value is used in marketing thermal
and PCI coals. Marketable coal quality reported is based on 2007
sales contract specifications, except for Moatize.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coal mines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type
|
|
Operating since
|
|
|
exhaustion date
|
|
|
Vale interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
Integra Coal:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South Opencut
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
1999
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
61.2
|
|
Middle Liddell Seam
|
|
Underground
|
|
|
1999
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
61.2
|
|
Barret and Hebden Seam
|
|
Underground
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023
|
|
|
|
61.2
|
|
North Opencut
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
61.2
|
|
Carborough Downs
|
|
Underground
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
|
80.0
|
|
Isaac Plains
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
Broadlea
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Moatize
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2046
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Changes
in coal reserves: 2008 versus 2007
Our coal reserves decreased from 995.2 to 923.7 million
metric tons.
We are reporting Middle Liddell Seam reserves for the first time
this year, at 15.8 million metric tons.
Reserves at Barret and Hebden Seam and North Opencut were
reduced to zero, from 36.9 and 8.7 million metric tons,
respectively, since they have been downgraded to mineral
resources while new studies are underway.
Reserves at Carborough Downs decreased from 47 to
46.2 million metric tons, mainly reflecting mining
depletion.
66
Reserves at Isaac Plains increased from 19.0 to
23.7 million metric tons, mainly reflecting a reserve
update and mining depletion.
Reserves at Moatize were unchanged from 2007 estimates, at
838 million metric tons, because no production activities
occurred in 2008.
REGULATORY
MATTERS
In this section, we describe the following:
|
|
|
|
|
mining regulation in Australia, Brazil, Canada, Indonesia and
New Caledonia;
|
|
|
|
railroad regulation in Brazil;
|
|
|
|
electric energy regulation in Brazil, Canada and Indonesia;
|
|
|
|
environmental regulation in Australia, Brazil, Canada,
Indonesia, New Caledonia and international standards;
|
|
|
|
European regulation of hazardous substances; and
|
|
|
|
Investment Canada Act undertakings.
|
Mining
regulation
Australiamining
regulation
In Australia, government approval is required for any mine and
infrastructure development that could have a significant impact
on a matter of national environmental significance. The key
features of the regulatory arrangements in each state and
territory are the following:
|
|
|
|
|
The government owns all minerals (with some minor exceptions),
and rights to minerals are separate from other interests in land.
|
|
|
|
Exploration and mining activities must be carried out pursuant
to a tenement granted by the state or territory in
which the activities will take place. A tenement holder has an
enforceable right to enter upon the land and undertake all works
authorized by the terms of the grant and applicable legislation.
The minister of the relevant state or territory may consent to
an assignment of a tenement subject to the satisfaction of
transfer conditions.
|
|
|
|
Tenements are granted by the state upon satisfaction of certain
conditions, such as: (i) posting of a security bond for
site rehabilitation in accordance with the site environmental
license or other requirements after completion of mining
operations; (ii) payment of any outstanding rent or
royalties; and (iii) compliance with the relevant state
mining legislation.
|
|
|
|
After a tenement is granted, further conditions apply for its
duration, such as payment of royalties on extractions and sales.
|
|
|
|
Tenements and other licenses may be required for purposes
incidental to mining, including access, storage and some
processing activities such as washing and crushing.
|
Mining rights in Australia may also be subject to native title.
Native title describes the rights and interests of
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in land and waters
according to their traditional laws and customs as recognized by
the laws of Australia. Native title does not equate to our
common understanding of title to land in the sense
of ownership of land and may consist of different rights and
interests. Examples include the right to access land, hunt,
gather and fish, conduct ceremonies, camp; and have possession,
use, occupation and enjoyment of the land. State laws require
consultation with traditional owner claimants to
67
identify cultural heritage values on areas to be disturbed by
mining, and implementation of appropriate management plans.
All Australian states and territories impose statutory royalties
on extraction of minerals and royalties on sales of extracted
minerals. The amount of the extraction royalty, the method of
its calculation and the minerals covered differ from
jurisdiction to jurisdiction. While there are some flat-rate
extraction royalties, others involve complicated calculations
taking into account the market value of the mineral and an index
price set by the jurisdiction. The royalty on revenues from
sales of extracted minerals is levied net of certain allowable
costs such as demurrage, marine costs (including ocean freight
and insurance) and exchange losses. Currently, the royalty rates
we pay on our coal operations are 6-8% in New South Wales and
7-10% in Queensland.
Compliance with the terms of a tenement and the applicable
regulatory scheme may involve significant expenditures. Failure
to comply with applicable requirements can result in financial
penalties, prosecution or, in extreme cases, forfeiture of the
tenements. Although the terms of a tenement and applicable
regulations may be subject to change or amendment by the state
or territory in certain circumstances, it is rare for this to
occur unilaterally and without prior notice or negotiation.
We own, or have rights to acquire interest in, a combination of
496 exploration or mining tenements in Australia, covering
978,600 hectares in New South Wales, 778,600 hectares in
Queensland and 861,600 hectares in Western Australia.
Brazilmining
regulation
Under the Brazilian Constitution, all mineral resources in
Brazil belong to the Brazilian government. The Brazilian
Constitution and Mining Code impose on mining companies various
regulatory restrictions relating to, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
the manner in which mineral deposits are exploited;
|
|
|
|
the health and safety of workers and the safety of residential
areas located near mining operations;
|
|
|
|
the protection and restoration of the environment;
|
|
|
|
the prevention of pollution; and
|
|
|
|
the support of local communities where mines are located.
|
Mining companies in Brazil can only prospect and mine for
mineral resources pursuant to prospecting authorizations or
mining concessions granted by the National Mineral Production
Department (Departamento Nacional de Produção
Mineral), or DNPM, an agency of the Ministry of Mines and Energy
of the Brazilian government. DNPM grants prospecting
authorizations to a requesting party for an initial period of
three years. These authorizations are renewable at DNPMs
discretion for another period of one to three years, provided
that the requesting party is able to show that the renewal is
necessary for proper conclusion of prospecting activities.
On-site
prospecting activities must start within 60 days of
official publication of the issuance of a prospecting
authorization. Upon completion of prospecting activities and
geological exploration at the site, the grantee must submit a
final report to DNPM. If the geological exploration reveals the
existence of a mineral deposit that is economically exploitable,
the grantee has one year (which DNPM may extend) from approval
of the report by DNPM to apply for a mining concession or to
transfer its right to apply for a mining concession to an
unrelated party. When a mining concession is granted, the holder
of the concession must begin
on-site
mining activities within six months. DNPM grants mining
concessions for an indeterminate period of time lasting until
the exhaustion of the mineral deposit. Extracted minerals that
are specified in the concession belong to the holder of the
concession. With the prior approval of DNPM, the holder of a
mining concession can transfer it to an unrelated party that is
qualified to own concessions. In some cases, mining concessions
are challenged by unrelated parties.
68
We own a combination of 2,663 exploration licenses and mining
concessions covering 8,115,316 hectares. We also have 1,175
applications comprising of bids and exploration licenses,
covering a total of 7,930,702 hectares.
The Brazilian government charges us a royalty known as the CFEM
(Compensação Financeira pela Exploração de
Recursos Minerais) on the revenues from the sale of minerals we
extract, net of taxes, insurance costs and costs of
transportation. The current annual rates on our products are:
|
|
|
|
|
2% for iron ore, kaolin, copper, nickel, fertilizers and other
minerals;
|
|
|
|
3% on bauxite, potash and manganese ore; and
|
|
|
|
1% on gold.
|
The Mining Code and ancillary mining laws and regulations also
impose other financial obligations. For example, mining
companies must compensate landowners for the damages and loss of
income caused by the use and occupation of the land (either for
exploitation or exploration) and must also share with the
landowners the results of the exploration (at the rate of 50% of
the CFEM). Mining companies must also compensate the government
for damages caused to public lands. A substantial majority of
our mines and mining concessions are on lands owned by us or on
public lands for which we hold mining concessions.
We are currently engaged in a series of administrative and other
legal proceedings alleging that we have failed to pay the proper
amount of CFEM. In addition, we are discussing with DNPM the
applicable rate for potash. See Item 8. Financial
informationLegal proceedingsCFEM-related
proceedings.
Canadamining
regulation
The Canadian provinces charge us a tax on profit from mining
operations. Profit from mining operations is generally
determined by reference to gross revenue from the sale of mine
output and deducting certain costs, such as mining and
processing costs and investment in processing assets. The
statutory mining tax rates for each of the provinces in which we
operate in Canada are: 10% in Ontario; 18% in Manitoba; and 15%
in Newfoundland and Labrador.
Ontario
At our Sudbury operations, we hold (i) mining rights,
(ii) surface rights, (iii) licenses of occupation and
(iv) mining claims, each granted to us by the Province of
Ontario.
Mining rights are rights to exploit and extract minerals on, in
or under the land, and surface rights are rights to use the
surface of the land. Mining rights and surface rights may be
either owned or leased. Mining rights and surface rights that
are owned remain in effect so long as we own the land to which
the rights apply. Mining rights and surface rights that are
leased remain in effect for the term of the lease, either 10 or
21 years. We own mining rights covering 82,058 hectares and
surface rights covering 60,002 hectares, including a combination
of mining and surface rights co-owned with third parties
covering 1,198 hectares. All properties at our Sudbury
operations that contain proven and probable ore reserves are
owned by us, with the exception of a portion of ore reserves
under Kelly Lake, which is under a
21-year
mining lease from the Province of Ontario and which can be
accessed from the Copper Cliff South Mine. We lease mining
rights covering 14,116 hectares from the Province of Ontario. We
do not expect any problems in obtaining renewals of these leases
since the only requirement for renewal is payment of a nominal
renewal fee. The next lease due for renewal expires in 2010.
Licenses of occupation allow the holder to use licensed land in
the manner specified in each license, including the right to
dig, excavate and remove ores and minerals from and under the
land. We currently hold licenses of occupation covering 2,939
hectares in Ontario, of which approximately 17 hectares are
jointly held with third parties.
69
Mining claims are rights to explore the land covered by the
claim. We hold mineral claims covering 8,455 hectares in
Ontario, of which 6,596 hectares are jointly held with third
parties.
The permission of the government of the Province of Ontario is
required for us to export from Canada intermediate products
derived from our Sudbury ores. In December 2005, the Ontario
government granted us permission to continue to export
intermediate nickel products to our nickel refinery in Clydach,
Wales until December 31, 2015. In December 2005, the
Ontario government granted us permission to continue to export
semi-refined PGMs concentrate to our precious metals refinery in
Acton, England until December 31, 2015. In June 2007, the
Ontario government also granted us permission to ship copper
anodes, copper concentrate and MK copper concentrate offshore
for further processing until June 27, 2012. We are not
aware of any reason at this time that would prevent us from
reaching an agreement with the Province of Ontario to extend
these permits for additional periods upon their expiration.
Manitoba
At our Thompson operations, our landholdings or mining rights
consist of
(i) order-in-council
leases (OIC Leases), (ii) mining leases, and
(iii) mineral claims.
OIC Leases entitle the lessee to explore for, and mine, all
minerals in the subsurface (except hydrocarbons, industrial
minerals and superficial deposits that are not incidental to the
mining, milling, smelting and refining processes). OIC Leases
provide for an initial
21-year term
and two subsequent guaranteed renewals of 21 years each,
for a total guaranteed lease period of 63 years. Subsequent
lease renewals beyond the three guaranteed
21-year
terms can be granted at the discretion of the Province of
Manitoba. We currently hold a total of 2,947 OIC Leases covering
109,043 hectares. Of these, 29 OIC Leases, covering 488
hectares, are held by Mystery Lake Nickel Mines Limited, which
is 82.6%-owned by Vale Inco (17.4% is held by Newmont
Exploration of Canada). Vale Inco holds the remaining OIC
Leases. All of our current OIC Leases have been renewed twice
(each is in its third guaranteed 21 year term) and remain
in effect through the
2022-2025
period.
Mineral leases are issued by the Province of Manitoba and convey
(i) the exclusive right to the minerals (other than quarry
minerals) existing on or under the land covered by the lease and
(ii) access rights to erect buildings and structures
(including shafts) to mine within the limits of the lease. The
duration of mineral leases is 21 years, and they are
renewable at the discretion of the Provinces Minister of
Science, Technology, Energy and Mines. We hold six mineral
leases that cover 4,151 hectares in the Thompson nickel belt.
These mineral leases remain in effect until April 1, 2013.
Mining claims are rights issued by the Province of Manitoba
under provincial legislation, which convey to the holder
(i) exclusive rights to the minerals (other than quarry
minerals) existing on or under the land covered by the claim and
(ii) access rights to explore for and develop minerals
owned by the Province. A mining claim does not, however, entitle
the holder to extract minerals from the land covered by the
claim. In order to extract minerals from the land covered by a
mining claim, the holder must obtain a mineral lease from the
Province of Manitoba. We hold 161 mining claims covering 35,204
hectares.
Newfoundland
and Labrador
At our Voiseys Bay operations, we hold (i) a mining
lease, (ii) a surface lease, (iii) mining licenses and
(iv) mineral claims.
All of the current estimated proven and probable ore reserves at
Voiseys Bay are located on lands covered by the mining
lease, which has a duration of 25 years. The mining lease
confers the exclusive right to extract minerals and carry out
mineral exploration, mining operations or mining processing and
development in, on or under the lands, or part of the lands,
covered by the lease, subject to our continued compliance with
the terms and conditions of an agreement entered into in
September 2002 between Vale Inco and the government of
Newfoundland and Labrador. Under the terms of the mining lease,
production cannot exceed on average 2.2 million metric tons
of ore annually for the first 10 years of mining operations
and on average
70
5.5 million metric tons of ore annually thereafter. The
mining lease is subject to an order issued by the provincial
government requiring us to complete primary production
(smelting, processing or refining) in the Province of
Newfoundland and Labrador of all minerals extracted under the
lease. However, the government has also issued an order allowing
us to export nickel concentrates containing up to 440,000 metric
tons of contained nickel until we have completed the
construction of a nickel processing facility in the Province.
This mining lease can be renewed for further
10-year
terms so long as we do not violate the terms of the lease and
apply for renewal at least three months prior to the expiration
of the current lease.
In conjunction with the mining lease for Voiseys Bay, we
hold a surface lease entitling us to use certain lands necessary
for our mining operations. Like the mining lease, the surface
lease came into effect on September 30, 2002 for a period
of 25 years, and may be renewed for further
10-year
terms.
A mineral license is required to explore a parcel of land. We
hold 1,978 mineral claims, which have been grouped into mineral
licenses. The mineral licenses expire in 2014. There are no
further renewal rights for these mineral licenses.
Indonesiamining
regulation
PT Incos operations in Indonesia are conducted pursuant to
a Contract of Work with the Indonesian government, which expires
in 2025. The Contract of Work gives PT Inco the exclusive right
to mine nickel and nickel-containing minerals in certain areas
on the Island of Sulawesi and to process and export the nickel
and associated minerals recovered from those areas. In exchange,
PT Inco pays a royalty fee on, among other items, its nickel
production on the concession area and has made certain other
commitments. Until March 2008 the royalty was equal to 1.5% of
revenues from sales of nickel products. As of April 2008, the
royalty payment was changed to equal a fixed amount based on
sales volume (US$78 per metric ton).
In August 2008, we applied for permits to use forestry land
located within the Contract of Work area and are in the process
of providing supporting materials required for the forestry
permits for Pomalaa.
Under the Contract of Work, PT Inco undertook to construct,
subject to economic and technical feasibility, two additional
production plants in Sulawesi, one in Pomalaa and another in
Bahudopi. With respect to Pomalaa, we are reviewing the
construction of a high-pressure acid leach processing facility
to produce nickel hydroxide, an intermediate nickel product,
with an annual production capacity of approximately 30,000
metric tons. We are also considering building a refinery at
Bahudopi, with a capacity of approximately 30,000 metric tons
per year to process the nickel hydroxide from Pomalaa. We plan
to mine a saprolitic nickel orebody in Bahudopi. Ore from
Bahudopi would be combined with ore from the Sorowako area to
feed the existing pyrometallurgical processing facility in
Sorowako. We are required to deliver a report to the Indonesian
Department of Energy and Mineral Resources by the end of April
2009 evaluating the economic and technical feasibility of the
construction of processing facilities at Pomalaa and Bahudopi.
If PT Inco defaults on its obligations to build these
facilities, these properties may have to be relinquished. We do
not report reserves for the Bahudopi or Pomalaa areas.
In January 2009, a new Mining Law came into effect that
introduces a new mining licensing scheme. The impact of the new
Mining Law on PT Inco under the existing Contract of Work will
remain unclear until implementing regulations have been
promulgated, which is expected to occur by January 2010 at the
latest. We are investigating the potential impacts that the new
Mining Law on PT Incos current operations and future
prospects in Indonesia. Below are some of the issues raised
under the new Mining Law.
|
|
|
|
|
The new Mining Law provides that existing Contracts of Work
remain in effect until their expiry, but it also requires the
amendment of existing Contracts of Work to conform to the new
Mining Law. It is unclear how these two provisions will be
reconciled, but the government may require amendments to PT
Incos Contract of Work.
|
|
|
|
PT Incos Contract of Work covers an area of approximately
218,000 hectares, and it states that PT Inco is not subject to
further relinquishment obligations. However, the new Mining Law
provides for
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
a maximum exploration-phase area per license of 100,000 hectares
and a maximum production- phase area per license of 25,000
hectares. Under the new Mining Law, PT Inco is required to
submit to the government for approval a work plan for all areas
(including those not currently in production) for the remainder
of the term covered by the contract. If the work plan is not
approved, the new Mining Law calls for our mining area to be
adjusted to the limits set forth in the law. All of PT
Incos reported mineral reserves are located in Sorowako,
South Sulawesi province, in an area that PT Inco is currently
actively mining.
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is unclear whether a Contract of Work holder will
automatically obtain a mining business license (IUP or IUPK, as
defined under the new Mining Law) once the Contract of Work
expires. Based on current reserve estimates, PT Incos life
of mine plan for its Sorowako operations could last until 2037.
We are unsure what the terms of any new mining license or
renewal would be under the new Mining Law. If PT Inco is unable
to continue its operations after its Contract of Work expires in
2025, we anticipate (assuming current rates of production) that
approximately 92.2 million metric tons of our reported
mineral reserves would be mineable prior to the expiry of the
Contract of Work in 2025. Any further production would require
adjustments to the life-of-mine plan.
|
|
|
|
The new Mining Law includes provisions such as requirements for
domestic processing and refining, a new articulation of the
basis for the royalty regime, an additional payment obligation
equal to 10% of net profit for IUPK holders, priority for local
and national contractors and restrictions on use of affiliated
companies.
|
In August 2008, the Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources
announced a new regulation relating to the procedure for the
determination of production limitations, which would permit the
Minister to place a limit on PT Incos production level.
While a production quota policy is to be designated at the
national level, individual limits are to be allocated on a
region-by-region
basis (down to the Regency level) for those regions where a
particular mineral is located. In substance, the regulation
conflicts with PT Incos rights under its Contract of Work,
which currently leaves the determination of production level at
the discretion of PT Inco. It is unclear how the system will
work, and it is possible that a governmental regulation relating
to production limitations may be issued in connection with the
new Mining Law.
New
Caledoniamining regulation
Concessions in New Caledonia generally represent long-term
permits (usually
75-year
terms, with some having longer or perpetual terms) granted for
mining large deposits that entitle the holder to the exclusive
right to exploit, extract and mine. A concession applies to one
or several minerals defined by the granting decision along with
its geographical location. The granting of a concession is based
on the delineation of an exploitable ore body made during
exploration activities conducted pursuant to exploration
permits. Surface rights, which are rights to use surfaces on or
outside mining permits for mining-related activities, can be
granted independently of mineral rights.
Our 74%-owned subsidiary, Vale Inco Nouvelle-Calédonie
S.A.S. (Goro Nickel), currently holds 67 mining
concessions in the Massif du Sud in New Caledonia, covering
20,277 hectares and authorizing the mining of nickel, cobalt,
chrome, iron ore and manganese. Our Goro project covers 6,571
hectares within eight of these mining concessions, of which four
are perpetual in term, two are renewable prior to their expiry
in 2016 and one is renewable prior to its expiry date in 2051.
Goro Nickel holds 41 surface rights, including surfaces of other
owners and an additional free land of the domain. A subsidiary
of Vale Inco, Tiébaghi Nickel, holds an additional eight
mining concessions outside the Goro project area, in a mining
domain called Tiébaghi.
The enactment of a new mining law may occur as part of the
Noumea Accord between New Caledonia and France. New Caledonia is
an overseas territorial community (collectivité
territoriale) of France with significant autonomy except in
the areas of foreign relations, defense, judicial, currency and
certain other related areas. The Noumea Accord sets forth a
process and timetable for increasing the autonomy of New
Caledonia over the coming years, with a referendum to be held by
2014 on whether New Caledonia should
72
become fully independent from France. Although we do not believe
that these developments will have an adverse effect on the Goro
project, there can be no assurances in this regard.
A mining law was passed in March 2009 that prohibits exporting
ore from the Goro area and requires the ore to be processed in
New Caledonia. In 2008, the South provinces government,
the owner of the seabed on which a pipeline is to be installed
in order to evacuate the treated water from the plant, imposed a
1% royalty on the revenue of the business. The French State and
Goro are challenging the legality of the royalty.
Railroad
regulation
Brazilrailroad
regulation
The Brazilian Ministry of Transportation and the transportation
regulatory agency (Agência Nacional de Transportes
Terrestres), or ANTT, regulate and supervise the policies of the
railroad transportation sector. The federal government may grant
private companies concessions for the construction, operation or
commercial development of railroads.
Railroad concession contracts granted by the federal government
impose certain shareholder ownership limitations. The concession
contract for FCA limits shareholder ownership to 20% of the
voting capital of the concessionaire, unless such limit is
waived by ANTT. We own 99.9% of FCA, which ANTT has authorized.
The 20% ownership limitation does not apply to our EFVM and EFC
railroads. ANTT also sets different tariff limits for railroad
services for each of the concessionaires and each of the
different products transported. So long as these limits are
respected, the actual prices charged can be negotiated directly
with the users of such services.
The MRS concession contract provides that each shareholder can
only own up to 20% of the voting capital of the concessionaire,
unless otherwise permitted by ANTT. As a result of our
acquisitions of CAEMI and Ferteco, our share in the voting
capital of MRS surpassed this threshold. As a result, Vale
waived its voting and veto rights with respect to MRS shares in
accordance with a 2006 ANTT resolution. We continue to have some
voting rights through the shareholdings of a subsidiary.
Our railroad concession contracts have a duration of
30 years and are renewable. The FCA and MRS concessions
expire in 2026, and the concessions for EFC and EFVM expire in
2027. We also own the subconcession for commercial operation for
30 years of a
720-kilometer
segment of the FNS railroad, in Brazil. This concession expires
in 2037.
Electric
energy regulation
Brazilelectric
energy regulation
The power industry in Brazil is regulated by the Ministry of
Mines and Energy and the regulatory agency ANEEL. The role of
ANEEL is to implement and enforce policies and regulations
designated by the Ministry of Mines and Energy and aimed at
organizing and regulating the electricity sector and power
companies. ANEEL is responsible for ensuring an efficient and
economical energy market through regulation, enforcement, as
well as monitoring prices and the operational efficiency of
power companies.
Under the law governing the electricity sector, concessions
grant exclusive rights to generate and transmit or to distribute
electricity in a particular area for a period of time that
should be sufficient for the concessionaire to recover its
investment. The concessions for power generation before
December 11, 2003 were granted for up to 35 years and
are renewable at the Federal Governments discretion for an
additional period of up to 20 years. Concessions for power
generation granted after December 11, 2003 are granted for
up to 35 years, without the possibility of renewal.
Concessionaires (distributors) are required to supply
electricity for public services, on a continuing basis, in
sufficient quantity and within approved standards of quality.
73
All of our concessions for power generation in Brazil were
granted before December 11, 2003. The next concession to
expire has an expiration date in 2028.
Given the hydrologic and integrated nature of the Brazilian
electricity generation matrix, Decree No. 2655/1998 created
the Mecanismo de Realocação de Energia (Energy
Reallocation Mechanism), known as MRE, a mechanism for sharing
hydrological risk, and consequently reducing generation
volatility among all generators. In order to implement the MRE,
ANEEL designates a level of energy production, known as Assured
Energy, for each generator that may be reviewed every five
years. Assured Energy is calculated in accordance with a
statistical model based on average rainfalls in the relevant
region, water flows of rivers and water levels in each
plants reservoir over a multi-year time frame.
Each generator is allowed to enter into contracts to sell up to
100% of its Assured Energy. To the extent a generator has signed
contracts for the sale of its Assured Energy, and as long as MRE
members, as a whole, are able to meet MRE Assured Energy levels,
it receives payments based on these contractual terms,
regardless of its level of actual generation. If all MRE members
meet their contracted energy and there is a surplus of energy
remaining, the net regional surplus generation is allocated
among generators in different regions and this energy surplus
may be sold in the wholesale market.
All contracts for energy purchases and sales are currently
recorded in the wholesale market, the Câmara de
Comercialização de Energia Elétrica, or the CCEE.
The CCEE is a nonprofit private entity subject to the
authorization, regulation and supervision of ANEEL, and is
responsible for operating the wholesale energy market and for
ensuring that energy transactions in the short-term market are
settled and cleared in an efficient manner. The CCEE is
primarily designed to effect the settlement of differences
between the amount of energy contracted under bilateral
contracts of the several market agents (generators,
distributors, traders and large consumers), and the amount of
energy actually consumed and produced. The settlement is done in
accordance with the CCEE spot prices, which are expressed in
R$/MWh and are calculated for each settlement period for each
sub-market.
Under Law No. 10,848/2004 and the regulations promulgated
pursuant to it, jurisdiction of certain regulatory areas is
under the Ministry of Mines and Energy rather than ANEEL. Under
this law, all consumers of electricity, including large
consumers, such as Vale, must contract the totality of their
energy needs through contracts. This law creates two parallel
markets for energy: a regulated market, in which distributors
enter into supply contracts with regulated customers, subject to
regulated prices, and an unregulated market, in which
consumidores livres, or free consumers, enter
into contracts with independent power producers at prevailing
market prices. Regulated consumers may migrate to the
unregulated market, but only after the termination of their
long-term contracts. Self-generators of energy, such as Vale,
are required to provide a pre-determined percentage of their
generated energy from concessions acquired after 2004 to the
regulated market for distributors acquisition.
Canadaelectric
energy regulation
The Canadian provinces are given significant jurisdictional
responsibility in many key areas by the Canadian Constitution.
The Constitution assigns jurisdiction over electricity and
natural resources to the provinces, and as a result the Canadian
electricity industry is primarily organized along provincial
lines. As a consequence of this constitutional reality, as well
as the variations in each provinces political and physical
environments, there are significant differences between the
electricity industries of each of the provinces.
Federal
level
In the context of the electricity industry, the federal sphere
of responsibility is primarily derived from the constitutional
authority over international and inter-provincial trade and
commerce. As a result, the construction and operation of
international transmission lines as well as the regulation of
electricity exports to the United States are matters that fall
within the authority of the National Energy Board, a federal
regulatory tribunal. Canadas nuclear industry is also
federally-regulated; this responsibility falls to the Canadian
Nuclear Safety Commission. An additional important area of joint
responsibility is that of environmental protection.
74
Responsibility for environmental matters (including the
environmental assessment of electricity developments) is shared
between the federal and provincial governments; which level of
government may be paramount changes with various environmental,
regulatory and government funding considerations.
Provincial
level
With the exception of those areas of responsibility that are
carved out for the federal government, as discussed above, most
matters of electricity industry regulation and policy are
addressed at the provincial level. Project developers must also
obtain certain key environmental approvals at the provincial
level.
Ontario
The power industry in Ontario is regulated by the Ontario Energy
Board (the OEB). The OEB is responsible for setting
rates and the licensing of all participants in the electricity
sector in Ontario.
Under the legislative framework in Ontario, we are considered to
be a generator, transmitter, distributor and retailer of
electricity in Ontario. Pursuant to the Definitions and
Exemptions Regulations under the Electricity Act (Ontario) and
the Ontario Energy Board Act, the provincial government has
decided for public policy reasons to exempt various parties from
many of the regulatory requirements related to the electricity
industry in Ontario, including rate regulation, licensing
requirements, regulatory codes of conduct and financial
record-keeping. It has exempted us from requirements applicable
to our hydroelectric power plants. In order to maintain our
exemption under these rules, we must, among other things, ensure
that any price charged by us for transmitting or distributing
electricity is no greater than the reasonable costs associated
with transmission or distribution. In addition to meeting the
requirements of the OEB, we are required to comply with the
rules of the Independent Electricity System Operator
(IESO) administered market.
Indonesiaelectric
energy regulation
Under Electricity Law No. 15 of 1985 as implemented by
Government Regulation No. 10 of 1989 (the
Electricity Law), the electric power supply business
is primarily conducted by a state-owned electric utility company
(PLN), but private entities licensed by the
government may also engage in the electric power supply or
generation business, subject to certain limitations. PT
Incos existing hydroelectric power plants, which generate
the majority of its electricity requirements, were constructed
and are operated pursuant to a 1975 decree of the Indonesian
government permitting private power generation under certain
circumstances. We expect PT Inco to qualify for the IUKS
license, which is available to a private entity that owns
power generation facilities whose output is intended for its own
purposes. An IUKS holder is generally permitted to sell its
surplus of electricity to PLN.
The 1975 decree gives the government the right to acquire PT
Incos hydroelectric power plants upon two years
notice to PT Inco. No such notice has been given by the
government. If this right were to be exercised, the decree
provides that the hydroelectric power plants would be acquired
by the government at their depreciated value, subject to the
government providing PT Inco with sufficient electricity to meet
its operating requirements, at a rate based on cost plus a
normal profit margin, for the remaining term of PT Incos
Contract of Work. The new hydroelectric dam that will be
constructed as part of PT Incos latest expansion program
is also expected to be subject to this decree.
Environmental
regulation
Environmental legislation is becoming stricter worldwide, which
could lead to greater costs for environmental compliance. For
instance, if we are required to modify installations, develop
new procedures or purchase new equipment, our environmental
compliance costs could increase.
Australiaenvironmental
regulation
Environmental regulation in Australia occurs through legislation
at the federal, state and territory levels and, to a limited
extent, the common law. For constitutional reasons, most
environmental regulation occurs at
75
the state or territory level and affects operations conducted
within that state or territory. Environmental laws impact our
Australian operations, principally by regulating:
|
|
|
|
|
the rehabilitation of disturbed land;
|
|
|
|
the emission or discharge of pollutants from our facilities;
|
|
|
|
the remediation
and/or
cleanup of any contamination;
|
|
|
|
the construction of water storage structures / stream
diversions;
|
|
|
|
access to water (including overland flows, streams, groundwater
and reservoirs/pipelines);
|
|
|
|
the protection of biodiversity, including protected species and
ecosystems;
|
|
|
|
the protection of indigenous and European cultural heritage;
|
|
|
|
the management, storage and disposal of waste and hazardous
substances; and
|
|
|
|
the protection of air quality, including control of ground
vibration, noise and odor.
|
In order to conduct our mining, energy generation and industrial
activities in Australia, we must undertake environmental impact
studies and submit reports or statements to relevant authorities
that oversee the granting of environmental approvals. We seek to
comply with all legal requirements and to achieve good
relationships with interested parties, especially with
communities located near our operations. Our environmental
management processes are designed to provide a systematic
approach to protection of environmental and social values.
Mine tenement holders are required to rehabilitate areas
disturbed by mining to a post mining land use, as agreed with
stakeholders. The minimum requirement of post mining landforms
is that they be safe, stable, self-sustaining and non-polluting.
Conditions attached to planning consents and environmental
licenses include rehabilitation completion criteria.
Financial deposits and third party undertakings must be lodged
to cover the third party cost of carrying out rehabilitation
works. The financial undertakings must be maintained until the
completion criteria are satisfied and rehabilitation works are
completed to agreed standards.
There is a range of consequences for breaching Australias
environmental laws. Penalties range from substantial fines and
jail terms to warning notices. Other consequences include
compensation, suspension or revocation of a license, or an order
to control, prevent or lessen the environmental harm caused by
an offense. Directors and managers can, in some instances, be
personally liable for the offenses.
Carbon
Pollution Reduction Scheme
The Australian government is introducing a Carbon Pollution
Reduction Scheme (CPRS) as part of a overall
strategy to address climate change and its impact, both within
Australia and globally. The government has made an unconditional
commitment to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 95% of 2000
levels by 2020 and a conditional commitment to reduce greenhouse
gas emissions to 85% of 2000 levels by 2020 (provided that a
global agreement by major economies is in place). Draft
legislation was released in the first quarter of 2009, and the
governments intention is to commence the CPRS on
July 1, 2010.
The CPRS will be Australias primary policy tool to drive
reductions in emissions of the six greenhouse gases covered
under the Kyoto Protocol. The scheme will put a price on carbon
in a systematic way throughout the economy by employing a
cap and trade mechanism. Under the CPRS, we will be
required to acquire a permit for every metric ton of greenhouse
gas emitted per year. The number of permits issued by the
government each year will be limited and will decrease every
year. We will be required to compete in the market to purchase
the number of permits required, either through an auction
process or on a secondary
76
trading market. The initial permit price is anticipated to be
approximately A$25, with a cap on prices of A$40 for the first
five years.
In the early years some concessions will apply, in particular in
relation to the coal sector through a Climate Change Action
Fund. Under this Fund, assistance of up to A$250 million
over five years will be provided to coal mine operations with
high fugitive emissions to promote emissions abatement. A
further A$500 million over five years will be provided as
direct assistance to gassy coal mines to assist them to adjust
while they explore abatement opportunities.
We are taking steps to manage our exposure under the scheme
including improving systems to monitor, measure and report
greenhouse gas emissions, including cost of emissions in
modeling for decision making purposes and identifying
opportunities to reduce our carbon emissions.
Brazilenvironmental
regulation
Federal, state and municipal legislation contain provisions for
the control and protection of the environment in Brazil. These
laws govern the protection of vegetation, the use of natural
resources, the reclamation and rehabilitation of mined areas,
the control of atmospheric emissions, the treatment of
industrial effluents, as well as the use, handling and final
disposal of hazardous materials and the control of water
resources.
In order to conduct our mining, energy generation and industrial
activities, we must prepare environmental impact assessments and
submit them to authorities that oversee the granting of
environmental permits. We seek to comply with all legal
requirements and to achieve good relationships with interested
parties, especially communities located near our operations. Our
environmental management system is designed to provide a
systematic approach to environmental issues.
Under Brazilian Federal Law No. 9,605/1998, non-compliance
with environmental laws and regulations can result in criminal
penalties, such as imprisonment and other restrictions for
individuals (including directors, officers and managers of
companies), and fines and the mandatory rendering of public
services by companies. Administrative penalties range from
warnings and fines to the suspension of corporate activities,
and may also include the loss or reduction of incentives, or the
cancellation or interruption of credit facilities granted by
governmental institutions.
Issuance of environmental licenses. We must obtain environmental
licenses in order to build, develop, expand and operate
facilities that use natural resources or may pollute the
environment. License validities can vary from one to
10 years, and have to be renewed for the life of the
undertaking. We seek to obtain the legally required licenses for
each of our facilities and activities.
In some cases, this process requires a significant amount of
time for the preparation of comprehensive environmental reports
and their evaluation, as well as for the establishment of
appropriate programs for environmental education of communities
located in areas affected by the proposed projects. We enter
into agreements with the appropriate federal and state
governmental environmental authorities with respect to
facilities whenever environmental non-compliance is detected in
order to make these facilities compliant.
Environmental compensation. A federal
environmental law (No. 9,985/2000) requires payment of
environmental compensation to state and federal
authorities, in order to create and maintain conservation areas.
This law authorizes state governments to promulgate regulations
setting forth a state-specific rate, which must be calculated
for each project based on the degree of environmental impact
caused. There are a number of uncertainties regarding the
application of this law, including the rate that will be applied
by the state governments and the basis for valuing investments.
Protection of vegetation. All of our projects
in Brazil are located in areas subject to federal environmental
laws, like the Brazilian Forest Code and the legal reserves
decree. In order to develop projects in areas such as the Amazon
region and the Brazilian savanna, we must maintain a certain
amount of land
77
undeveloped for environmental conservation. In the Atlantic
Forest, which is protected by specific laws aimed at ensuring
its sustainable development, we are required to set aside land
for conservation that must be equivalent in both area and in
ecological characteristics to any land that we use for mining
activities in the forest. Additionally, mining activities in
certain areas of the Atlantic Forest are restricted depending on
the stage of vegetation growth.
Prevention and environmental control
measures. Our environmental policies also aim to
prevent, control and reduce the environmental impact caused by
our business operations. We invested US$310 million in
environment-related projects in 2008 in Brazil.
Water use. We are intensive water users in
various states with hydrological resources that vary from very
high water availability in the Amazon region to scarcity in the
northeast of Brazil. The Hydrological Resources Management
System implemented throughout Vale includes evaluation of the
availability of water in the areas where we operate and programs
to rationalize and control water use. We continually monitor new
water legislation and regulations and take particular interest
in requirements adopted under the National Policy of
Hydrological Resources, which defines the conditions for
obtaining water use grants and the fees applicable to that use
and for effluents disposal.
Environmental control systems. As a mining
company, air emissions control is one of our main objectives.
Control equipment and systems, such as stockpiles and road water
aspersion and use of chemical dust suppressants or installation
of filters and electrostatic precipitators at our facilities are
complemented by comprehensive monitoring systems and control
software. Besides achievement of legal compliance, air quality
in the installations and its effects in the neighboring
communities are continuously evaluated, and we believe we make
the necessary investments for air quality improvement.
With respect to improvements in water quality, we strive to
treat and control the pollutants discharged into the sea and
local rivers or other water bodies and also use extensive water
recycling in our operations. We are researching new processes
and technologies for the improvement of water use and recycling
and treatment. Through our comprehensive waste management
system, we aim to achieve greater control of the generation and
disposal of our waste, to develop opportunities to reuse,
recycle and to reduce waste.
Our mine decommissioning guidelines describe a complete set of
directives, including technical practices and procedures to be
followed during mine closures. The guidelines outline procedures
for the rehabilitation and monitoring of degraded areas, the
main steps and sequence to be followed during closure, and any
liabilities that may result after mine closure. The guidelines
also provide standardized basic criteria and procedures, based
on the directives of the CVM and the SEC (FAS 143), for
cost evaluation, the establishment of current budgets, future
decommissioning and reclamation (see Note 3 to our
consolidated financial statements).
The mines water and tailings storage dams and waste rock
deposits are classified according to a risk matrix involving all
the parameters related to construction, operation and safety
monitoring. A comprehensive audit program has been established,
which evaluates the stability of all those structures and
provides the inputs for the development of corrective or
preventative action plans when necessary.
Our environmental program also includes reclamation projects
intended to (i) protect against soil erosion,
(ii) create buffers between our activities and communities
in surrounding areas, and (iii) maintain biodiversity
through ecosystem restoration. We partner with universities and
governmental research entities to conduct extensive research on
methods for ecosystem protection. We regularly perform
comprehensive fauna and flora investigations to minimize the
environmental risks related to investing in potentially
sensitive areas.
We participate in the conservation of Brazilian ecosystems by
leaving land undeveloped and protecting certain private lands.
We also participate in the conservation of lands located in
federally-designated Conservation Units and develop
and support research on biodiversity. In the last three decades,
we have also provided support to indigenous communities in the
areas of education, health, infrastructure development and
technical assistance with the aim of enhancing quality of life
and self sufficiency in these communities.
78
Subterraneous development. A suit challenging
a new Brazilian environmental decree that permits mining in
certain subterraneous areas may adversely affect our ability to
conduct some mining operations.
Canadaenvironmental
regulation
Our operations in Canada are subject to numerous environmental
laws and regulations relating to air emissions, water
discharges, soils, recycling and waste management,
decommissioning and reclamation, and employee health and safety,
among other areas.
Sulfur dioxide
(SO2)
and metals emissions reduction in Ontario. Our
Sudbury smelting operations are subject to legislation of the
Ontario government requiring Vale Inco to significantly reduce
its emissions of sulfur dioxide. In 2008, total
SO2
emissions from our Sudbury operations were below the legislated
limit of 175,000 metric tons. By 2015, the
SO2
annual emission limit will fall to the federal emission
reduction target of 66,000 metric tons. Compliance with the
federal emission reduction target will require significant
capital expenditures.
A separate regulation, R419/05 Air PollutionLocal
Air Quality, was passed in November 2005. New air quality
standards and compliance requirements, demonstrated by both
measurement and air dispersion modeling, will be phased in
between 2010 and 2020 for different industrial sectors. These
standards will apply to Vale Inco in February 2010. Vale Inco
completed its assessment and determined that the Copper Cliff
Smelter Complex would not meet the compliance requirements for
nickel dust emissions. In October 2008, we applied to the
Ministry of Environment for an alternative standard for nickel
at this facility for a five-year period, and we are awaiting
formal feedback. There are provisions in the regulation for
applications for extensions. In addition, there are provisions
within the regulation for the Ministry to further review and
reduce emission limits even further on a priority basis.
As part of the Atmospheric Emission Reduction Project,
internally referred to as the AER, we are currently
investigating the best available technologies and operating
options to meet the lower 2015
SO2
limit and the reduced metal ambient air concentration limits.
The AER project team is staffed by the senior management of our
Ontario operations. Compliance with both emission limits will
require significant capital expenditures, estimates of which are
included in our five-year capital plan.
Sulfur dioxide
(SO2)
and particulate emissions reduction in
Manitoba. Emissions from our Thompson smelting
operations are also regulated under Manitoba legislation
limiting
SO2
emissions to 23,000 metric tons per month (on a four-month
rolling average) and 187,000 metric tons per calendar year. In
2008, emissions from our Thompson operations were within these
limits.
In April 2006, the federal government, through Environment
Canada, encouraged base metal smelters and refineries to
voluntarily prepare Pollution Prevention Plans,
addressing limit targets for
SO2
and particulate emissions. For Manitoba, the limit targets for
2015 are 22,800 metric tons for
SO2,
198 metric tons for particulate and a 90% reduction of the
Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA) toxic
metals from the 1988 baseline. These target levels are lower
than the current emission limits and we will not be able to meet
these targets without making significant capital expenditures.
Compliance with these targets could adversely affect our
financial results and cash flow, particularly for our Thompson
operations.
Sudbury and Port Colborne soils. We have been
working with regulatory authorities and other interested parties
to evaluate elevated levels of nickel and other metals in soils
in the vicinity of our processing facilities in Sudbury and Port
Colborne, Ontario that may be related to the historical emission
of windblown metal-containing particulates. We voluntarily
agreed to conduct detailed risk assessments in Port Colborne,
and methodologies for soil remediation have been evaluated
there. Any efforts we are required to undertake to investigate
or remediate these matters may involve significant expenditures.
Given the existence of various legal appeals and scientific and
medical studies underway, it is not possible to predict the
effect these studies and actions could have on our business,
results of operation or financial condition.
79
Canadian regulations for greenhouse gases and air
pollutants. In April 2007, the Canadian
government announced the Regulatory Framework for Industrial Air
Emissions, proposing intensity targets for greenhouse gases and
regulated emission targets for certain air pollutants.
Compliance with the greenhouse gas targets will require
investment in our Canadian operations
and/or the
purchase of carbon allowances or offsets through a proposed
Canadian Carbon Emissions Trading System. Compliance with the
proposed regulatory targets for air pollutants are anticipated
to be similar to the requirements in progress through the
previously discussed Pollution Prevention Plan. However, at this
stage in the legislative process, it is unclear whether
additional operating or capital expenditures will be required to
comply with enacted amendments or what effect these regulations
will have on our business, financial results or cash flow from
operations.
Canadian Environmental Protection
Act. Pursuant to CEPA, in 2006 the federal
government categorized approximately 23,000 chemical substances
in terms of two criteria: (a) persistence, bioaccumulation,
and inherent toxicity to the environment; and (b) high
hazard to humans with a high likelihood of exposure to
individuals in Canada. For substances that meet either or both
criteria for categorization, screening or detailed assessments
must be undertaken and, if deemed necessary, risk management
measures may be required. In late 2006, the government began a
study of 200 high-priority chemical substances. Cobalt and
cobalt chloride are among these chemicals, and specific studies
with respect to them could begin in early 2009. We cannot
predict what impact the CEPA data challenge will have on our
business, financial results or cash flow from operations;
however, previous assessments on nickel compounds have had no
material impact on our operations.
Sulfur dioxide (Canada and United States). In
2008, the American Conference of Governmental Industrial
Hygienists (ACGIH) ratified a new threshold limit
value for sulfur dioxide in the workplace. This new ACGIH value
will be legally binding in the Province of Manitoba in 2009. The
approach taken by the ACGIH in setting the new limit has
deviated significantly from their past practices and focused
solely on short term exposure. The new limit is effectively an
order of magnitude lower than the previous limit and will
represent a significant challenge for compliance. In the near
term, workplace exposures will be managed with procedural
improvements and with the use of personal protective equipment.
The potential future impact of the new limit on our financial
performance, including capital investment and compensation
claims, is unclear at this time.
Permitting for new operations. In August 2008,
Vale Inco Newfoundland & Labrador Limited was formally
released from the need for further environmental assessments on
its proposed hydrometallurgical commercial processing facility
in Long Harbour. As of February 2009, the project is currently
awaiting a permit for residue storage in Sandy Pond. This permit
is required before construction of the facility can begin. It is
anticipated that remaining technical issues will be resolved and
that a permit will be granted in 2009.
Indonesiaenvironmental
regulation
PT Incos operations are subject to environmental
regulations and permits issued by the Indonesian government. PT
Incos environmental, health and safety policy includes a
commitment to meet or exceed these requirements. In 2008, full
compliance with stack particulate emission limits was achieved
following the complete implementation of bag house filters on
all furnaces in 2007, at a capital cost of US$62 million.
The site remained in compliance in 2008 with regulations
concerning suspended solids in runoff water and virtually all
metals levels, including soluble nickel.
We are currently implementing an
SO2
mitigation feasibility study on alternatives to reduce stack
SO2
discharge levels so that compliance can be consistently
achieved. This program, which has been approved by the
Indonesian government, includes monitoring and engineering
assessments of available mitigation technologies.
In September 2007, a new discharge regulation for nickel mining
and processing activities was released by the Ministry of the
Environment. This lowered the acceptable level of chromium 6
from 0.5 milligrams per liter to 0.1 milligrams per liter. A
detailed engineering study was completed in 2008 to address this
new
80
regulation. The measures we are taking should be sufficient to
ensure a high level of confidence regarding compliance with this
new regulation.
Environmental performance at the site was recognized by the
government in the form of a gold award for rehabilitation (for
the second consecutive year), and an improved rating in the
governments Program for Pollution Control, Evaluation, and
Rating (PROPER).
New
Caledoniaenvironmental regulation
Our Goro project is subject to French and New Caledonian
environmental regulations. Environmental baseline monitoring,
particularly for the marine environment, continued in 2008. In
preparation for the operation phase, a new tree nursery capable
of producing over 260,000 seedlings was constructed and began
operations in 2008. We expect to increase the nursery capacity
to 1 million seedlings in 2013. In September 2008, we
entered into a community agreement with respect to the Goro
project. The agreement sets forth social and environmental
goals. The authorities granted us operating permits in October
2008.
European
regulation of hazardous substances
REACH. The European Commission has adopted a
European Chemicals Policy, known as REACH (Registration,
Evaluation, and Authorisation of Chemicals). REACH
establishes a system for the management of chemicals that are
manufactured in or imported into the EU. It is possible that our
ability to sell certain of our products into Europe,
particularly nickel products, will be adversely affected by the
application of REACH to chemical substances associated with our
products.
Under REACH, manufacturers and importers will be required to
register new substances prior to their entry into the European
market. There is a phase-in period for registering existing
substances based on volume and hazard, provided that the
substances were pre-registered within a six-month window during
2008. Except where specifically exempted from REACH
registration, all existing substances manufactured in or
imported into EU by us were pre-registered. In addition, the
uses of certain substances deemed to be of very high concern,
including some nickel and cobalt substances, will be subject to
an authorization process. Details about how the authorization
process will work in practice remain to be determined.
Comprehensive legislative review and risk
assessment. EU Regulation 793/93 (EEC), a
regulation covering the evaluation of the risks of and controls
for existing substances, includes five nickel substances (nickel
sulphate, nickel chloride, nickel nitrate, nickel carbonate and
nickel metal) as targets. The Danish Environmental Protection
Agency (the Danish EPA) was appointed the principal
agency for conducting risk assessments on these substances. The
final draft of the Human Health risk assessment was completed in
early 2006 and the final draft of the Environmental Risk
Assessment was completed in 2008. In 2009, it is expected that
the final, combined risk assessment document will be published.
To date, the risk assessment documents have led to hazard
classifications (or reclassifications) of approximately 145
nickel compounds in world commerce. At this time, due to other
legislative changes in the EU, the legal enforceability of the
hazard classifications is unclear. We are currently assessing
compliance plans and business implications.
Internationalenvironmental
regulation
ISO and OHSAS certifications. Our
environmental management system is based on the International
Organization for Standardization (ISO) standard
14001. We have ISO 14001 certificates covering:
|
|
|
|
|
iron ore and pelletizing operations (Alegria, Timbopeba,
Água Limpa, Fábrica Nova, Fazendão, Cauê,
Conceição, Córrego do Feijão, Brucutu, Morro
da Mina, Gongo Soco, Fábrica, Mutuca, Tamanduá,
Capitão do Mato, Pico, Capão Xavier, Jangada,
Aboboras, Mar Azul and Carajás mines and Fábrica and
Tubarão pelletizing plants);
|
|
|
|
manganese and ferroalloys plants (Azul and Morro da Mina mines
and Vale Manganèse France);
|
81
|
|
|
|
|
nickel operations (Clydach Refinery, Vale Inco Japan Matsuzaka
Plant, Jinco Nonferrous Metal, IATM Dalian, IATM Shenyang and
Taiwan Nickel Refining Corporation);
|
|
|
|
precious metals operations (Acton Refinery);
|
|
|
|
port operations (Tubarão port and Itaguaí maritime
terminal);
|
|
|
|
aluminum operations (Alunorte, Albrás and Valesul); and
|
|
|
|
kaolin production facilities (PPSA and CADAM).
|
Samarco and MRN are also certified under this standard. We also
have obtained OHSAS 18001 certificates for the MBR system,
Clydach refinery, Acton refinery, as well as the operations of
our IATM Dalian & IATM Shenyang, Taiwan Nickel
Refining Corporation (TNRC) and Jinco Nonferrous
Metals Co. subsidiaries. TNRC is OHSAS 18001 certified.
Harmonization of classification and labeling of
chemicals. The Globally Harmonized System
(GHS) is a global hazard classification and
compatible labeling system for chemicals published by the United
Nations. Although adoption of the GHS standard by individual
countries is voluntary, the Plan of Implementation of the World
Summit on Sustainable Development encouraged countries to
implement the GHS as soon as possible with a view to having the
system fully operational by 2008.
Implementation has been fragmented and has taken longer than
expected. Some countries, such as Japan, Korea, and Taiwan, have
so far implemented the GHS for workplace hazard communication
purposes only. In 2009, the International Maritime Organization
and Europe will implement the GHS for transportation purposes.
Most countries are in partial stages of implementation with a
work plan to completely adopt the GHS standard over the next
several years. We do not believe that the adoption of the GHS
will have a material impact on the results of operations or on
financial conditions; however, additional transportation
requirements may be implemented for some materials under the GHS
rules.
Investment
Canada Act undertakings
We made a number of undertakings to the Canadian Minister of
Industry in connection with his approval in 2006 of our
acquisition of Vale Inco. We believe we are substantially in
compliance with these undertakings, which are briefly described
below.
Creation of a Canada-based global nickel
business. We committed to locate the headquarters
of our global nickel business in Toronto, Ontario and gave Vale
Inco a mandate to expand its business as a global leader in the
nickel industry. In furtherance of this mandate, we have
transferred management responsibility for our interest in
existing and future nickel projects to Vale Inco, including our
interest in the Onça Puma and Vermelho projects in Brazil.
We also undertook, for at least three years from the date of
acquisition, not to carry out any layoffs at Vale Incos
Canadian operating facilities, and to maintain aggregate
employment at such facilities at no less than 85% of the
aggregate employment level as of the date on which the
acquisition occurred.
Acceleration of Voiseys Bay development
project. We undertook to fully support the
Voiseys Bay development project.
Enhanced investments in Vale Incos long-term
future. To help strengthen Vale Incos
position as a leader in the global nickel mining business and
contribute to ensuring the long-term viability of Vale
Incos operations in Sudbury and Thompson, we undertook to
increase Canadian expenditures in a number of areas, including
mineral exploration and research and development, for a
three-year period from the date of the acquisition.
82
Corporate social responsibility. We undertook
to increase spending on employee programs in Canada for a
three-year period from the date of the acquisition. We also
undertook to increase spending on environmental compliance
programs in Canada over that same period.
Continuing contributions to communities. We
undertook to maintain Vale Incos involvement and
commitment to the growth of Ontarios mining cluster,
including its membership in the Mineral Industry Cluster
Council. We agreed to respect all agreements entered into by
Vale Inco with provincial governments, local governments, labor
unions and aboriginal groups, including the Labrador Inuit
Association and the Innu Nation, in Canada. We also undertook to
honor all commitments made by Vale Inco with regard to the
funding of educational institutions in Canada, including
commitments made with respect to the Centre for Excellence in
Mining Innovation at Laurentian University in Sudbury, Ontario.
Each of the undertakings made by us to the Canadian Minister of
Industry is subject to the Investment Canada Act,
GuidelinesAdministrative Procedures, Monitoring of
Investments. Among other things, these guidelines state
that performance is judged in the context of overall results and
that an investor who is unable to fulfill a commitment will not
be held accountable where such inability is a result of factors
clearly beyond its control.
CAPITAL
EXPENDITURES
During 2008, we made capital expenditures and other investments
of US$10.319 billion, of which US$7.519 billion was on
organic growth, composed of US$6.457 billion on projects
and US$1.063 billion on research and development, while
US$2.672 billion was invested in maintaining existing
operations. Research and development expenditures are treated as
a current expense for accounting purposes.
In October 2008, our Board of Directors approved an investment
budget for 2009 of US$14.235 billion. We will implement the
investment budget in accordance with market conditions. The
amount of our investment will depend on various factors,
including changes in exchange rates relative to our basic
assumptions, prices of equipment and engineering services, the
scope of projects and the pace of project execution. Of the
total 2009 budget, 81.8%, or US$11.652 billion, is
allocated to expenditures for organic growth. Of this amount,
US$10.178 billion is budgeted for project execution, and
US$1.473 billion is budgeted for research and development,
of which US$736 million is allocated to mineral
exploration. The remaining US$2.584 billion is budgeted for
investments to support existing operations.
The following table summarizes by major business area the
breakdown of our capital expenditures in 2007 and 2008 and our
investment budget in 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009 budget
|
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
(% of total)
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
(% of total)
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
(% of total)
|
|
|
Ferrous minerals
|
|
US$
|
1,748
|
|
|
|
15.9
|
|
|
US$
|
2,171
|
|
|
|
21.0
|
|
|
US$
|
4,179
|
|
|
|
29.4%
|
|
Non-ferrous minerals
|
|
|
3,988
|
|
|
|
36.2
|
|
|
|
4,614
|
|
|
|
44.7
|
|
|
|
4,785
|
|
|
|
33.6%
|
|
Logistics
|
|
|
977
|
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
|
|
1,952
|
|
|
|
18.9
|
|
|
|
3,027
|
|
|
|
21.3%
|
|
Coal
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
392
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
808
|
|
|
|
5.7%
|
|
Energy
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
406
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
822
|
|
|
|
5.8%
|
|
Steel
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
357
|
|
|
|
2.5%
|
|
Other
|
|
|
298
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
510
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
|
1.8%
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
3,379
|
|
|
|
30.7
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
US$
|
11,004
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
US$
|
10,319
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
US$
|
14,235
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83
The following table describes our expenditures for our main
investment projects in 2008 and our budgeted expenditures for
projects in 2009, together with estimated total expenditures for
each project. All figures in the table are presented on a cash
basis. For a description of the status of each of the projects
in the table, see Lines of business.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Budgeted
|
|
Business area
|
|
Project
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Total capex(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
Ferrous minerals and logistics
|
|
Carajás 130 mtpy iron ore mine
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
798
|
|
|
|
2,478
|
|
|
|
Carajás - additional 10 mtpy iron ore mine
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
290
|
|
|
|
Fazendão iron ore mine
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
233
|
|
|
|
Serra Sul (mine S11D) iron ore mine
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
675
|
|
|
|
11,297
|
|
|
|
Apolo iron ore mine
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
2,509
|
|
|
|
Vargem Grande pelletizing plant
|
|
|
501
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
1,192
|
|
|
|
Tubarão VIII pelletizing plant
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
527
|
|
|
|
636
|
|
|
|
Oman pelletizing plant
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
458
|
|
|
|
1,356
|
|
|
|
Northern Corridor
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
956
|
|
|
|
Southeastern Corridor
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
553
|
|
|
|
Litorânea Sul railroad
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
935
|
|
Non-ferrous minerals
|
|
Onça Puma nickel mine
|
|
|
985
|
|
|
|
597
|
|
|
|
2,297
|
|
|
|
Goro nickel mine
|
|
|
1,063
|
|
|
|
520
|
|
|
|
4,083
|
|
|
|
Totten nickel and copper mine
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
362
|
|
|
|
Voiseys Bay nickel refinery
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
2,177
|
|
|
|
Salobo copper mine
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
459
|
|
|
|
1,152
|
|
|
|
Salobo expansion copper mine
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
855
|
|
|
|
Tres Valles copper mine
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
Bayovar phosphate mine
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
479
|
|
|
|
Paragominas II bauxite mine
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
|
Paragominas III bauxite mine
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
487
|
|
|
|
Alunorte: stages 6 & 7 - alumina refinery
|
|
|
320
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
846
|
|
|
|
CAP Alumina refinery
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
405
|
|
|
|
2,200
|
|
Coal
|
|
Moatize coal mine
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
444
|
|
|
|
1,322
|
|
|
|
Carborough Downs coal mine
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
330
|
|
Energy
|
|
Barcarena thermal power plant
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
314
|
|
|
|
898
|
|
|
|
Estreito hydroelectric power plant
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
514
|
|
|
|
Karebbe hydroelectric power plant
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
410
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Estimated total capital expenditure
cost for each project.
|
Item 4A. Unresolved
staff comments
None.
Item 5. Operating
and financial review and prospects
OVERVIEW
The year 2008 saw the end of a long period of growing demand and
rising prices for minerals and metals that began in 2002. The
acceleration of the global financial crisis since September 2008
precipitated a dramatic change in the pace of economic activity
around the world. The ensuing heightened levels of uncertainty
and retrenchment in the demand for minerals and metals resulted
in a weaker operational and financial performance in the fourth
quarter of 2008.
We have been very proactive in responding to the deterioration
of the economic environment. Production cutbacks, involving
primarily the shutdown of higher-cost operational units, and the
implementation of new strategic priorities are the main
components of our fast reaction to the global recession. Cost
minimization, operational and financial flexibility and
reconciliation of cash preservation with the pursuit of
profitable growth options have assumed great importance to deal
with the current scenario. Given powerful cash
84
generation, large cash holdings and a low-risk debt portfolio,
we are able to develop projects based on the merits of each
growth opportunity and unconstrained by short-term cash
restrictions.
Despite the sharp economic downturn in the fourth quarter, the
year 2008 was our sixth consecutive year of record growth in
revenues, operating income and net income. Our growth in 2008
reflected strong results for the first nine months of 2008
relative to the same period of 2007, which more than offset a
weaker fourth quarter. Below are the main highlights of
Vales performance in 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
Record sales volumes of iron ore (264 million metric tons),
nickel (276,000 metric tons), copper (320,000 metric tons),
alumina (4.2 million metric tons), cobalt (3,087 metric
tons), precious metals (2.4 million troy ounces), platinum
group metals (411,000 troy ounces) and coal (4.1 million
metric tons).
|
|
|
|
Gross operating revenue of US$38.5 billion, a 16.3%
increase over 2007, mainly due to higher prices.
|
|
|
|
Net income of US$13.2 billion, or US$2.61 per share on a
fully diluted basis. This was an 11.9% increase over 2007. The
increase in net income was driven primarily by an 11.8% increase
in operating income, reflecting a 16.1% increase in net
operating revenue.
|
|
|
|
Net income for 2008 included a charge of US$950 million for
impairment of goodwill we recorded upon the acquisition of Vale
Inco.
|
|
|
|
The acceleration of the global financial crisis in the fourth
quarter of 2008 resulted in weak demand for our iron ore and
iron ore pellets and substantial price declines for non-ferrous
minerals. In contrast to the significant gains in the first nine
months of 2008, when net income was 28.1% higher than in the
same period of 2007, net income in the fourth quarter of 2008
was 46.9% lower than in the fourth quarter of 2007. Net income
in the fourth quarter of 2008 was 71.6% lower than in the third
quarter of 2008, mainly due to the goodwill impairment charge
recognized in the fourth quarter, which in turn reduced net
income by 19.7% compared the third quarter of 2008.
|
In parts of the following discussion, we draw comparisons
between the third and fourth quarters of 2008 to show the
effects of the significantly different market conditions in the
fourth quarter.
85
Demand
and prices
The following table sets forth our average realized prices for
our principal products for each of the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
(US$ per metric ton, except where indicated)
|
|
Iron ore
|
|
|
40.00
|
|
|
|
45.33
|
|
|
|
67.32
|
|
|
|
73.92
|
Iron ore pellets
|
|
|
75.21
|
|
|
|
78.62
|
|
|
|
131.76
|
|
|
|
145.25
|
Manganese
|
|
|
70.60
|
|
|
|
107.34
|
|
|
|
350.46
|
|
|
|
393.44
|
Ferroalloys
|
|
|
886.97
|
|
|
|
1,311.48
|
|
|
|
2,709.60
|
|
|
|
2,603.77
|
Nickel
|
|
|
31,981.53
|
|
|
|
37,442.28
|
|
|
|
21,662.14
|
|
|
|
11,926.62
|
Copper
|
|
|
6,380.84
|
|
|
|
6,611.27
|
|
|
|
6,331.07
|
|
|
|
3,041.35
|
Kaolin
|
|
|
164.78
|
|
|
|
195.88
|
|
|
|
194.06
|
|
|
|
185.95
|
Potash
|
|
|
195.09
|
|
|
|
264.09
|
|
|
|
591.18
|
|
|
|
676.47
|
Platinum (US$/oz)
|
|
|
1,115.59
|
|
|
|
1,314.25
|
|
|
|
1,557.07
|
|
|
|
865.27
|
Cobalt (US$/lb)
|
|
|
14.93
|
|
|
|
24.56
|
|
|
|
31.01
|
|
|
|
19.68
|
Aluminum
|
|
|
2,558.76
|
|
|
|
2,784.70
|
|
|
|
2,805.86
|
|
|
|
2,470.15
|
Alumina
|
|
|
343.99
|
|
|
|
338.76
|
|
|
|
348.42
|
|
|
|
321.59
|
Bauxite
|
|
|
30.46
|
|
|
|
36.08
|
|
|
|
41.47
|
|
|
|
41.67
|
Coal:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thermal coal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53.73
|
|
|
|
85.38
|
|
|
|
93.32
|
Metallurgical coal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67.37
|
|
|
|
170.55
|
|
|
|
256.25
|
Iron
ore and iron ore pellets
Demand for our iron ore and iron ore pellets is a function of
global demand for carbon steel. Demand for carbon steel, in
turn, is strongly influenced by global industrial production.
In general, our iron ore sales are made pursuant to long-term
supply contracts, which provide for annual price adjustments.
Iron ore and iron ore pellets are not priced like commodities
because of the wide array of quality levels and physical
characteristics. Various factors influence price differences
among the various types of iron ore, such as the iron content of
specific ore deposits, the various beneficiation and purifying
processes required to produce the desired final product,
particle size, moisture content, and the type and concentration
of contaminants (such as phosphorus, alumina and manganese ore)
in the ore. Fines, lump ore and pellets typically command
different prices.
Our 2008 reference prices for iron ore fines increased by 65%,
and prices for our iron ore pellets were 86.67% higher than in
2007. Carajás iron ore fines were priced at a premium of
US$0.0619 per dry metric ton Fe unit over the 2008 reference
price for fines from the Southeastern and Southern Systems. In
2008, demand for iron ore and iron ore pellets exceeded our
production capacity in the first nine months of the year, but it
declined in the fourth quarter, when global steel production
contracted 19.5% compared to the prior quarter.
The global financial crisis has had a strong negative impact on
our markets for iron ore and iron ore pellets. Following
10 years of substantial increases in both Chinese steel
production and imports of iron ore, Chinese economic growth
decelerated sharply in the fourth quarter of 2008, as a result
of a tightening domestic credit market and slowing exports. The
contraction of Chinas credit market has significantly
impeded growth in the Chinese real estate sector, one of the
largest consumers of steel in the country. Although the Chinese
government has been increasing expenditures on infrastructure
and public housing, launching tax incentives, and taking
measures to ease credit tightness, there is uncertainty about
the extent and duration of the current economic downturn.
Furthermore, the European economy may recover more slowly than
other regions, which would negatively affect the volume of our
shipments of iron ore and iron ore pellets to this region.
Notwithstanding its severity, we believe the global cyclical
downturn will not disrupt long-term economic development of
emerging market economies and structural changes over the last
years that have caused a
86
rapid expansion in the demand for minerals and metals,
especially iron ore. In addition, China, the worlds
largest steel producer, has been increasingly dependent on
imported iron ore, and we expect this trend to continue in the
foreseeable future.
Manganese
and ferroalloys
The prices of manganese ore and ferroalloys are influenced by
trends in the carbon steel market. Ferroalloy prices are also
influenced by the prices of the main production inputs, such as
manganese ore, power and coke. Price negotiations for manganese
ore are held mainly on a spot or quarterly basis. Ferroalloy
prices are settled on a quarterly basis.
In 2008, our average realized price for manganese ore was 226.5%
higher than in 2007. After peaking mid-year, manganese prices
dropped in the fourth quarter of 2008 due to weakening demand.
In 2008, our average realized price for ferroalloys was 106.4%
lower than in 2007.
Nickel
Prices for our nickel products generally reflect prices at the
LME, the principal terminal market for primary nickel in the
world. Our nickel price realizations tend to lag LME cash nickel
price movements, due primarily to the terms of our contractual
sales arrangements with certain customers. Given our high
product quality, we typically realize a premium over prevailing
LME cash prices for our finished nickel products.
Demand for nickel, which is mainly used to produce stainless
steel, is strongly affected by stainless steel production. In
2008, demand for nickel for stainless steel production was weak,
and rising nickel inventories kept prices under pressure. Nickel
demand for sources of consumption other than stainless steel
production, which represents approximately 40% of global nickel
consumption, declined in the second half of 2008. The average
LME spot price of nickel in 2008 dropped 43.4% relative to 2007,
to US$21,027 per metric ton. In the fourth quarter of 2008, the
LME spot price of nickel declined 42.6% compared to the third
quarter of 2008, to US$10,885. Stainless steel production
declined 8% from 2007 levels, due to inventory de-stocking and
the global demand contraction. Production fell 2% in the first
half of 2008 compared to the same period of 2007, then declined
13% in the second half of 2008 compared to the same period of
2007.
Primary nickel (including ferro-nickel, nickel pig iron and
nickel cathode) and secondary nickel (i.e. scrap) are competing
nickel sources for stainless steel production. The choice
between different types of primary and secondary nickel is
largely driven by their relative prices and availability. In
2008, the stainless steel scrap ratio is estimated to have
remained relatively unchanged compared to 2007, at 49%. Nickel
pig iron production is estimated to have declined approximately
17% in 2008 relative to 2007, given depressed primary nickel
prices and high production costs for nickel pig iron. In 2008,
nickel pig iron represented approximately 5% of the global
supply of primary nickel, compared to 6% in 2007.
Despite the cyclical dynamics of the stainless steel industry,
we continue to have a positive long-term outlook for nickel. At
the end of 2008 and in early 2009, stainless steel production
remained weak in the United States, Europe and Japan, although
there were some signs of improvement in China. Per capita
consumption of stainless steel in high-growth emerging market
economies is still low, and strong growth potential remains for
nickel demand from non-stainless steel applications.
Aluminum
Our sales of aluminum are made at prices based on prices on the
LME or the New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX) at
the time of delivery. Our prices for bauxite and alumina are
determined by a formula linked to the price of aluminum for
three-month futures contracts on the LME and to the price of
alumina FOB Australia.
In 2008, demand and prices for aluminum declined as a result of
the global economic downturn. The average LME spot price of
aluminum declined 3.2% in 2008 relative to 2007, to US$2,554 per
metric ton. In
87
the fourth quarter of 2008, the average LME spot price of
aluminum declined 35.5% compared to the third quarter of 2008.
Copper
Growth in copper demand in recent years has been driven
primarily by Chinese imports. Copper prices are determined on
the basis of (i) prices of copper metal on terminal
markets, such as the LME and the NYMEX, and (ii) in the
case of intermediate products such as copper concentrate and
copper anode (which comprise most of our sales), treatment and
refining charges negotiated with each customer. Under a pricing
system referred to as MAMA (month after month of
arrival), sales of copper concentrates and anodes are
provisionally priced at the time of shipment, and final prices
are settled on the basis of the LME price for a future period,
generally one to three months after the shipment date.
In 2008, the copper market was negatively affected by the global
economic slowdown. World average copper prices on the LME
dropped 5.1% in 2008 compared to 2007. In the fourth quarter of
2008, the LME spot price of copper declined 52.8% compared to
the third quarter of 2008. In the medium term, however, we
expect copper supply to remain limited. Existing copper mines
are subject to a natural decline in grade, and a meaningful
increases in global mine capacity is unlikely, given the absence
of any significant project in an advanced development stage.
Coal
Demand for metallurgical coal is driven by demand for steel,
especially in Asia. Demand for thermal coal is closely related
to electricity consumption, which will continue to be driven by
global economic growth, particularly from emerging markets
economies.
Price negotiations for metallurgical coal are mainly held on an
annual basis. Price negotiations for thermal coal are held both
on a spot and annual basis.
Coal prices have increased in the past several years, but we
expect current economic conditions to revert this trend in the
short- to medium-term. In 2008, the average sale price of
metallurgical coal was 153.2% higher than in 2007, at US$170.55
per metric ton. The average sale price of thermal coal was 58.9%
higher than in 2007, at US$85.38 per metric ton.
Logistics
Demand for our transportation services in Brazil is primarily
driven by Brazilian economic growth, mainly in the agricultural
and steel sectors. Cargo volumes declined in 2008 due to a
reduction in the transportation of agricultural products,
particularly grains, as a result of weaker Brazilian exports
during the year. Our logistics businesses were also negatively
affected by the reduction of Brazilian steel output and pig iron
exports in the fourth quarter of 2008.
We earn our logistics revenues primarily from fees charged to
customers for the transportation of cargo via our railroads,
port and ships. Our railways generate most of these revenues.
Nearly all of our logistics revenues are denominated in reais
and subject to adjustments for changes in fuel prices.
Prices in the Brazilian market for railroad services are subject
to ceilings set by the Brazilian regulatory authorities, but
they primarily reflect competition with the trucking industry.
Production
capacity
Capacity expansions are a key factor affecting our revenues. We
continue to invest in increasing capacity in several facilities,
but we are managing expansion projects in accordance with
ongoing assessments of market conditions. The following
expansion projects started production in 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
In our iron ore business, Fazendão started up in the first
quarter of 2008, with annual production capacity of
15.8 million metric tons of run-of-mine.
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
In our nickel business, we completed the Dalian nickel
processing plant in 2008. Dalian, located in China, began
operations in April 2008 and has annual production capacity of
35,000 metric tons of finished nickel.
|
|
|
|
In our aluminum business, we completed in the first half of 2008
the first expansion of Paragominas (Paragominas II), from 5.4 to
9.9 million metric tons per year. We also completed the
construction of stages 6 and 7 at our Alunorte alumina facility
in Brazil, which started operating in the second half of 2008,
adding 1.9 million metric tons to its nominal production
capacity.
|
See Item 4. Information on the companyCapital
expenditures for more information about expansion projects
currently underway.
Currency
price changes
Our results of operations are affected in several ways by
changes in currency exchange rates. The most important of these
are the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Most of our revenues are denominated in U.S. dollars, while
most of our costs of goods sold are denominated in other
currencies, principally the real (62% in 2008) and
the Canadian dollar (20% in 2008). As a result, changes in
exchange rates affect our operating margins. Our margins are
adversely affected by a decline in the value of the
U.S. dollar. We experienced this effect on margins for
several years until the middle of 2008.
|
|
|
|
Most of our long-term debt is denominated in currencies other
than the real, principally the U.S. dollar
(US$13,267 million at December 31, 2008). Because our
functional currency for accounting purposes is the real,
changes in the value of the U.S. dollar against the real
result in exchange gain or loss on our net liabilities in
our financial results. In the second half of 2008, our higher
average cash holdings in U.S. dollars helped offset the
negative effect of exchange rate variation on our
U.S. dollar denominated liabilities.
|
|
|
|
We had real-denominated debt of US$4,590 million at
December 31, 2008. Since most of our revenue is in
U.S. dollars, we use derivatives to convert our debt
service from reais to U.S. dollars. Changes in the
value of the U.S. dollar against the real result in
fair value variation on these derivatives, affecting our
financial results. For more information on our use of
derivatives, see Item 11. Quantitative and qualitative
disclosures about market risk.
|
A decline in the value of the U.S. dollar tends to result
in: (i) lower operating margins and (ii) higher
financial results due to exchange gains on our
net U.S. dollar denominated liabilities and fair value
gains on our currency derivatives. Conversely, an increase in
the value of the U.S. dollar tends to result in:
(i) better operating margins and (ii) lower financial
results, due to exchange losses on our net U.S. dollar
denominated liabilities and fair value losses on our currency
derivatives.
The U.S. dollar was weak against the real and the
Canadian dollar during the first half of 2008 but began to
appreciate significantly in the third quarter of the year. At
December 31, 2008, the U.S. dollar had appreciated
31.9% against the real and 24.5% against the Canadian
dollar relative to December 31, 2007. These currency price
changes had the following impacts on our financial results.
|
|
|
|
|
Operating margins. During the first half of
2008, the weakness of the U.S. dollar had an adverse effect
on our operating margins. However, in the second half of the
year, the appreciation of the U.S. dollar against the
real and the Canadian dollar contributed to cost
reductions, which materialized mostly in the fourth quarter of
2008. These mitigated the adverse effects of the economic crisis
on our margins.
|
|
|
|
Exchange gains (losses). We recorded net
exchange gains of US$364 million in 2008, and losses of
US$241 million in the fourth quarter.
|
89
|
|
|
|
|
Gains (losses) on derivatives. We recorded net
fair value losses on derivatives of US$812 million in 2008,
including US$586 million in the fourth quarter. These
losses were primarily on cross-currency swap positions that
convert our real-denominated debt expense into
U.S. dollars. The U.S. dollar value of our
real-denominated debt decreased to US$4.7 billion as
of December 31, 2008, from US$5.4 billion as of
September 30, 2008.
|
Operating
expenses
Our principal operating expenses consist of: (i) cost of
goods sold, (ii) selling, general and administrative
expenses and (iii) research and development expenses.
Cost of goods sold. Our cost of goods sold
consists of costs of energy (fuel and electric energy),
materials (such as components for railroad and mining
equipment), outsourced services (especially ore and waste
removal, transportation and maintenance), purchased products for
processing or resale (such as iron ore, iron ore pellets, nickel
and aluminum products), personnel, and depreciation and
depletion.
Selling, general and administrative
expenses. Our selling, general and administrative
expenses consist principally of personnel expense, sales expense
and depreciation.
Research and development expenses. Our
research and development expenses consist primarily of
investments related to mineral exploration and studies for the
development of projects, which are recorded as expenses until
the economic viability of the related mining activities is
established.
90
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS2008 COMPARED TO 2007
Revenues
Our gross operating revenues rose to US$38.509 billion in
2008, a 16.3% increase over 2007. Our net operating revenues
increased 16.1% to US$37.426 billion in 2008. The following
table summarizes our gross revenues by product and our net
operating revenues for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
% change
|
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ferrous minerals:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iron ore
|
|
US $
|
11,908
|
|
|
US $
|
17,775
|
|
|
|
49.3%
|
|
Iron ore pellets
|
|
|
2,738
|
|
|
|
4,301
|
|
|
|
57.1
|
|
Manganese
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
245.5
|
|
Ferroalloys
|
|
|
711
|
|
|
|
1,211
|
|
|
|
70.3
|
|
Pig iron
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
80.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
15,515
|
|
|
|
23,699
|
|
|
|
52.7
|
|
Non-ferrous minerals:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nickel and other products(1)
|
|
|
11,789
|
|
|
|
7,829
|
|
|
|
(33.6)
|
|
Potash
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
65.7
|
|
Kaolin
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
|
(12.2)
|
|
Copper concentrate(2)
|
|
|
802
|
|
|
|
893
|
|
|
|
11.3
|
|
Aluminum
|
|
|
2,722
|
|
|
|
3,042
|
|
|
|
11.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
15,729
|
|
|
|
12,268
|
|
|
|
(22.0)
|
|
Total minerals and metals
|
|
|
31,244
|
|
|
|
35,967
|
|
|
|
15.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logistic services
|
|
|
1,525
|
|
|
|
1,607
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
Other products and services(3)
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
|
935
|
|
|
|
170.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross revenues
|
|
|
33,115
|
|
|
|
38,509
|
|
|
|
16.3
|
|
Value-added tax
|
|
|
(873)
|
|
|
|
(1,083)
|
|
|
|
24.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating revenues
|
|
US $
|
32,242
|
|
|
US $
|
37,426
|
|
|
|
16.1%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes copper, precious metals,
cobalt and other by-products produced by Vale Inco.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Does not include copper produced by
Vale Inco.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Includes coal.
|
Iron ore. Gross revenues from iron ore
increased by 49.3% due primarily to higher prices. The increase
in average selling prices resulted mostly from a 65.0% increase
in 2008 reference prices for iron ore fines, effective as of
April 2008 for the majority of our customers. Sales volume
increased slightly
year-on-year.
In the fourth quarter of 2008, our sales volume decreased by
37.9% compared to third quarter 2008, due to the impact of the
global macroeconomic conditions.
Iron ore pellets. Gross revenues from iron ore
pellets increased by 57.1% due to 67.6% higher average sales
prices, which more than offset a 4.3% reduction in sales volume.
The higher realized prices resulted from an 86.7% increase in
2008 reference prices for blast furnace and direct reduction
pellets. However, fourth quarter sales volume decreased by 20.9%
compared to third quarter 2008, due to lower global demand for
iron ore pellets.
Manganese ore. Gross revenues from manganese
ore increased by 245.5% due primarily to higher prices. However,
the deterioration of market conditions in the fourth quarter of
2008 had a negative impact on volumes sold, which decreased by
75.7% compared to the third quarter of 2008.
Ferroalloys. Gross revenues from ferroalloys
increased by 70.3% due to a substantial increase in average
selling prices, which was partially offset by an 18.9% decrease
in volume sold. The decline in volume is primarily attributable
to the shut-down of our ferroalloy operations in Dunkerque,
France, since August 2008
91
due to problems with the electric furnace. During the fourth
quarter of 2008, sales volume decreased by 44.2% compared to the
third quarter of 2008, as a result of a decline in demand.
Nickel and other products. Gross revenues from
this segment decreased by 33.6%, mainly due to the following
factors.
|
|
|
|
|
Gross revenues from nickel sales decreased 40.6%, from
US$10.043 billion in 2007 to US$5.970 billion in 2008,
due to a 42.1% decline in average nickel prices. In the fourth
quarter of 2008, the average nickel sales price declined by
39.4% compared to third quarter 2008. Nickel sales volume in the
fourth quarter of 2008 remained in line with volumes sold in the
third quarter of 2008.
|
|
|
|
Gross revenues from copper sales decreased by 4.0%, from
US$1.183 billion in 2007 to US$1.136 billion in 2008,
due to a 4.2% drop in the average sales price. In the fourth
quarter of 2008, the average copper sales price declined by
54.2% compared to the third quarter of 2008. Copper sales volume
in the fourth quarter of 2008 remained in line with volumes sold
in the third quarter of 2008.
|
|
|
|
Gross revenues from sales of precious metals and other products
increased 19.9%, from US$427 million in 2007 to
US$512 million in 2008.
|
Potash. Gross revenues from sales of potash
increased by 65.7%. The increase was due to a 123.9% increase in
average selling prices, which was partially offset by a 26.0%
decline in sales volume compared to the prior year. Volumes sold
in the fourth quarter of 2008 were 73.0% lower than in the third
quarter of 2008, as a result of the weak performance of the
Brazilian agricultural sector and the accumulation of large
inventories by farmers in anticipation of higher fertilizer
prices.
Kaolin. Gross revenues from sales of kaolin
decreased by 12.2%, due principally to an 11.4% decrease in
volume.
Copper concentrate. Gross revenues from sales
of copper concentrate increased by 11.3% due to an 8.1% increase
in sales volumes and a 3.0% increase in the average sales price.
Aluminum. Gross revenues from our aluminum
business increased by 11.8%. This increase is attributable to
the following factors.
|
|
|
|
|
Gross revenues from sales of aluminum decreased 1.6%, from
US$1.570 billion in 2007 to US$1.545 billion in 2008,
due to lower volume sold. Since there is a one-month lag between
aluminum market prices and sales prices, our average aluminum
sales price in the fourth quarter of 2008 did not fully reflect
the drop in aluminum market prices.
|
|
|
|
Gross revenues from sales of alumina increased 33.4%, from
US$1.470 billion in 2008 compared to US$1.102 billion
in 2007, due to higher volumes sold in connection with the
Alunorte expansion.
|
|
|
|
Gross revenues from sales of bauxite decreased 44.9%, from
US$49 million in 2007 to US$27 million in 2008, due to
a reduction in sales volume caused by increased usage of bauxite
at our alumina refinery.
|
Logistics services. Gross revenues from
logistics services increased by 5.4%. The increase reflects
higher prices caused by the increase in fuel costs and changes
in the mix of cargo, which more than offset the slight reduction
in volume of freight cargo.
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from railroad transportation increased by 6.8%, from
US$1.220 billion in 2007 to US$1.303 billion in 2008.
Average prices increased by 13.0%, and volume shipped decreased
by 5.5%. The decline in volumes of general cargo resulted from
the reduction in transportation of agricultural products, mainly
grains, as a consequence of weaker Brazilian exports during
2008. The
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
reduction of Brazilian steel output and pig iron exports in the
fourth quarter of 2008 also contributed to reduced levels of
activity in our logistics business.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from port operations increased by 13.9%, from
US$267 million in 2007 to US$304 million in 2008.
|
|
|
|
We had no revenues from shipping in 2008, compared to
US$38 million in 2007, due to the sale of our controlling
interest in Log-In in 2007 as a result of which Log-In is no
longer consolidated in our results.
|
Other products and services. Gross revenues
from other products and services increased from
US$346 million in 2007 to US$935 million in 2008,
primarily reflecting increased sales of coal. Revenues from
sales of metallurgical coal were US$457 million in 2008,
compared to US$128 million in 2007. Revenues from sales of
thermal coal were US$120 million in 2008, compared to
US$32 million in 2007. Increased coal sales were driven by
two factors: (i) a full year of consolidation of Vale
Australia in 2008, compared to eight months of consolidation in
2007; and (ii) the increase in average coal prices in 2008
compared to 2007.
Operating
costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
% change
|
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of ores and metals
|
|
US$
|
13,628
|
|
|
US$
|
14,055
|
|
|
|
3.1%
|
|
Cost of logistic services
|
|
|
853
|
|
|
|
930
|
|
|
|
9.0
|
|
Cost of aluminum products
|
|
|
1,705
|
|
|
|
2,267
|
|
|
|
33.0
|
|
Others
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
389
|
|
|
|
40.4
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
16,463
|
|
|
|
17,641
|
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
1,245
|
|
|
|
1,748
|
|
|
|
40.4
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
733
|
|
|
|
1,085
|
|
|
|
48.0
|
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
950
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other costs and expenses
|
|
|
607
|
|
|
|
1,254
|
|
|
|
106.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses
|
|
US$
|
19,048
|
|
|
US$
|
22,678
|
|
|
|
19.1%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93
Cost of
goods sold
The following table summarizes the components of our cost of
goods sold for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
% change
|
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outsourced services
|
|
US$
|
2,628
|
|
|
US$
|
2,880
|
|
|
|
9.6%
|
|
Materials costs
|
|
|
2,313
|
|
|
|
2,900
|
|
|
|
25.4
|
|
Energy:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel
|
|
|
1,406
|
|
|
|
1,842
|
|
|
|
31.0
|
|
Electric energy
|
|
|
878
|
|
|
|
1,078
|
|
|
|
22.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
2,284
|
|
|
|
2,920
|
|
|
|
27.8
|
|
Acquisition of iron ore and pellets
|
|
|
976
|
|
|
|
1,179
|
|
|
|
20.8
|
|
Acquisition of other products:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nickel
|
|
|
1,522
|
|
|
|
687
|
|
|
|
(54.9)
|
|
Aluminum
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
317
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Other
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
(64.0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
2,872
|
|
|
|
2,214
|
|
|
|
(22.9)
|
|
Personnel
|
|
|
1,873
|
|
|
|
2,139
|
|
|
|
14.2
|
|
Depreciation and depletion
|
|
|
2,049
|
|
|
|
2,664
|
|
|
|
30.0
|
|
Inventory adjustment
|
|
|
1,062
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Others
|
|
|
1,382
|
|
|
|
1,924
|
|
|
|
39.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
US$
|
16,463
|
|
|
US$
|
17,641
|
|
|
|
7.2%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our total cost of goods sold increased 7.2% from 2007 to 2008.
This increase resulted primarily from the factors described
below.
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation of the U.S. dollar. Given
most of our costs and expenses are denominated in currencies
other than the U.S. dollar, the depreciation of the
U.S. dollar during 2008 led to higher costs in 2008. COGS
currency exposure in 2008 was made up as follows: 62% in
Brazilian reais, 20% in Canadian dollars, 14% in
U.S. dollars, 2% in Indonesian rupiah and 2% in other
currencies.
|
|
|
|
Outsourced services. Outsourced services costs
increased by 9.6% in 2008 due to higher sales volumes, the
depreciation of the U.S. dollar against the real,
higher prices of services and maintenance costs. During the
fourth quarter, lower sales volumes and the appreciation of the
U.S. dollar contributed to reduce costs by 28.6% against
the third quarter of 2008.
|
|
|
|
Material costs. Material costs increased by
25.4% in 2008, primarily reflecting higher sales volumes and
higher costs for the maintenance of equipment. In the fourth
quarter of 2008, material costs dropped 24.8% compared to the
third quarter of 2008, due to an overall reduction in volumes
and the average U.S. dollar appreciation against the
real.
|
|
|
|
Energy costs. Energy costs increased by 27.8%
in 2008. This increase primarily reflected higher energy prices,
higher consumption due to the leasing of the pelletizing
operations from our joint ventures, and the depreciation of the
U.S. dollar. In the fourth quarter, the overall reduction
in volumes and the average U.S. dollar appreciation against
the real led to a 31.2% reduction compared to the third
quarter of 2008.
|
|
|
|
Personnel costs. Personnel costs increased by
14.2%, mainly reflecting the depreciation of the
U.S. dollar against the real and the impact of wage
increases pursuant to a two-year agreement with our Brazilian
employees entered into in November 2007. During the fourth
quarter, the overall reduction in volumes and the appreciation
of the U.S. dollar against the real contributed to a
12.9% decline in costs compared to the third quarter of 2008.
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of iron ore and iron ore
pellets. The cost of iron ore and iron ore
pellets purchased from third parties increased 20.8%, mainly due
to higher benchmark prices. We purchased 11.9 million
metric tons of iron ore from third parties in 2008 compared to
8.3 million metric tons in 2007, a 43.4% increase. This was
partly offset by a decrease in the volume of pellets purchased
from third parties, from 11.7 million metric tons in 2007
to 5.9 million metric tons in 2008, as a result of the
leasing of the pelletizing plants from our joint ventures.
|
|
|
|
Other costs. The increase of
US$542 million was mainly due to the operating lease
agreements signed during 2008 with our joint ventures Nibrasco,
Itabrasco and Kobrasco, under which we leased four pelletizing
plants for a period from five to 30 years.
|
The increase in total cost of good sold was partially offset by
the following factors.
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of products, which includes nickel concentrates for
processing under tolling contracts, intermediary products and
finished nickel, totaled US$2,214 million in 2008 compared
to US$2,872 million in 2007, as a result of lower prices
and volumes.
|
|
|
|
We recognized additional cost of goods sold in 2007, in the
amount of US$1.062 billion, because of the adjustment of
inventory resulting from the acquisition of Vale Inco.
|
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by 40.4%,
or US$503 million. The increase was mainly attributable to
an adjustment related to copper sales and to higher expenses
related to global integration of IT infrastructure advertising
and brand management. The adjustment for copper sales arose from
the effects of sharply declining copper prices under the MAMA
pricing system. In the fourth quarter of 2008, copper prices
declined 48.8% compared to the third quarter of 2008, causing
final prices for copper sales be much lower than the previously
set provisional prices. The difference was accounted for as an
adjustment of US$316 million.
Research
and development expenses
Research and development expenses increased by 48.0%. The
US$352 million increase primarily reflects an increase in
mineral exploration and project studies in several regions,
including South America, Asia, Africa and Australia.
Impairment
of goodwill
In 2008, we recognized a US$950 million impairment of the
goodwill associated with our 2006 acquisition of Vale Inco, of
which US$1.336 billion remains. For a full description of
the impairment test, see Note 13 of our financial
statements herein.
Other
costs and expenses
Other costs and expenses increased by US$647 million as a
consequence of non-recurring events, as follows:
US$204 million due to an additional payment related to tax
assessments on third-party railroad transportation services by
our iron ore operations in previous years, US$199 million
relating to provision for loss on materials and
US$77 million of market value assessment of nickel
inventories.
95
Operating
income by segment
The following table provides information concerning our
operating income by segment and as a percentage of revenues for
the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Segment operating income
(loss)
|
|
|
Segment operating income
(loss)
|
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
(% of net operating
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
(% of net operating
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
revenues)
|
|
|
|
|
|
revenues)
|
|
|
Ferrous minerals:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iron ore
|
|
US$
|
6,325
|
|
|
|
54.4%
|
|
|
US$
|
9,988
|
|
|
|
57.4%
|
|
Pellets
|
|
|
659
|
|
|
|
25.3
|
|
|
|
1,606
|
|
|
|
39.1
|
|
Manganese ore
|
|
|
(9)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
67.3
|
|
Ferroalloys
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
28.0
|
|
|
|
604
|
|
|
|
55.8
|
|
Pig iron
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
23.5
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
52.1
|
|
Non-ferrous minerals:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nickel and other products
|
|
|
4,785
|
|
|
|
40.6
|
|
|
|
1,131
|
|
|
|
14.5
|
|
Potash
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
22.0
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
50.2
|
|
Kaolin
|
|
|
(32)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copper concentrate
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
32.6
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
12.7
|
|
Aluminum products
|
|
|
828
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
|
|
516
|
|
|
|
17.3
|
|
Logistics:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Railroads
|
|
|
297
|
|
|
|
29.1
|
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
22.4
|
|
Ports
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
15.5
|
|
Ships
|
|
|
(12)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Others
|
|
|
(159)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
18.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
US$
|
13,194
|
|
|
|
40.9%
|
|
|
US$
|
14,748
|
|
|
|
39.4%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our operating income decreased as a percentage of net operating
revenues, from 40.9% in 2007 to 39.4% in 2008, due to the
impairment charge in the nickel segment. In the fourth quarter
of 2008, operating margin was 14.7%, compared to 47.2% in the
third quarter of 2008, due to lower shipment volumes and prices.
Our ferrous minerals business was responsible for 93.6% of our
cash generation in the fourth quarter of 2008, compared to 79.9%
in the third quarter.
|
|
|
|
|
This comparison reflects the effect of margin reductions in
nickel, copper concentrate, aluminum products and railroads,
counterbalanced by higher margins in iron ore, iron ore pellets,
manganese ore, ferroalloys, potash and ports.
|
|
|
|
The increase in operating margin for iron ore and iron ore
pellets primarily reflects higher average selling prices, which
were partially offset by (i) the impact of the appreciation
of the real against the U.S. dollar on our operating
costs and expenses and (ii) higher research and development
expenditures.
|
|
|
|
The significant increase in operating margins for manganese and
ferroalloys is attributable to higher prices, reflecting market
tightness during most of 2008.
|
|
|
|
The increase in operating margin for potash is attributable to
higher prices, which offset the decrease in volumes during the
fourth quarter of the year.
|
|
|
|
The decrease in operating margin for nickel and other products
primarily reflects (i) the decline in average selling
prices and (ii) the goodwill impairment in 2008.
|
|
|
|
The margin declines in the aluminum products segment resulted
primarily from higher energy costs and higher freight costs. The
higher freight costs are due to an increase in the volume of
bauxite transported from the Trombetas bauxite mine, which
belongs to MRN.
|
96
Non-operating
income (expenses)
The following table details our net non-operating income
(expenses) for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
Financial income
|
|
US$
|
295
|
|
|
US$
|
602
|
|
Financial expenses
|
|
|
(2,517)
|
|
|
|
(1,765)
|
|
Gains (losses) on derivatives, net
|
|
|
931
|
|
|
|
(812)
|
|
Foreign exchange and monetary gains, net
|
|
|
2,553
|
|
|
|
364
|
|
Gain on sale of investments
|
|
|
777
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
Non-operating income (expenses)
|
|
US$
|
2,039
|
|
|
US$
|
(1,531)
|
|
We had net non-operating expenses of US$1.531 billion in
2008, compared to net non-operating revenues of
US$2.039 billion in 2007. This change primarily reflects
the following factors.
|
|
|
|
|
An increase in financial income, principally due to higher
average cash balances, resulting from our global equity offer.
|
|
|
|
A decrease in financial expenses, mainly due to lower average
total debt.
|
|
|
|
A US$812 million loss in 2008, compared to a
US$931 million gain in 2007, principally related to a swap
of real-denominated debt into U.S. dollars. The
transaction generated a gain of US$791 million in 2007 and
a loss of US$833 million in 2008 due to the exchange rate
variation.
|
|
|
|
Lower foreign exchange gains due to the depreciation of the
U.S. dollar. Despite the appreciation of the
U.S. dollar against our functional currency, the
real, in the second half of the year, the larger average
cash holdings in U.S. dollar softened the negative effect
of the foreign exchange variation in our
U.S. dollar-denominated liabilities.
|
|
|
|
A US$80 million gain on sales of investments in 2008 from
the sale of our interest in Jubilee Mines, compared to a
US$777 million gain in 2007 from our sales of interests in
Usiminas (US$456 million gain), Log-In (US$238 million
gain) and Lion Ore Mining (US$80 million gain).
|
Income
taxes
For 2008, we recorded net income tax expense of
US$535 million, compared to US$3.201 billion in 2007.
Our effective tax rate has historically been lower than the
Brazilian statutory rate because: (i) income of some
non-Brazilian subsidiaries is subject to lower rates of tax;
(ii) we are entitled under Brazilian law to deduct the
amount of our distributions to shareholders that we classify as
interest on shareholders equity; and (iii) we benefit
from tax incentives applicable to our earnings on production in
certain regions of Brazil. As a result, the effective tax rate
on our pretax income was 4.0% in 2008 and 21% in 2007. In
addition, the effective tax rate on our pre-tax income decreased
from 21% to 4% in 2008 as a result of the accounting effects of
foreign exchange variation, which are not taxable.
Affiliates
and joint ventures
Our equity in the results of affiliates and joint ventures
resulted in a gain of US$794 million in 2008, compared to a
gain of US$595 million in 2007. The increase was primarily
due to higher net income at our investee Samarco, where a new
plant began operations in 2008. Note 12 to our financial
statements herein summarizes our equity in the results of
affiliates and joint ventures.
97
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS 2007 COMPARED TO 2006
Revenues
Our gross operating revenues rose to US$33.115 billion in
2007, a 62.6% increase over 2006. Our net operating revenues
increased 64.1% to US$32.242 billion in 2007. The following
table summarizes our gross revenues by product and our net
operating revenues for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
% change
|
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ferrous minerals:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iron ore
|
|
US$
|
10,027
|
|
|
US$
|
11,908
|
|
|
|
18.8%
|
|
Iron ore pellets
|
|
|
1,979
|
|
|
|
2,738
|
|
|
|
38.4
|
|
Manganese
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
40.0
|
|
Ferroalloys
|
|
|
508
|
|
|
|
711
|
|
|
|
40.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
12,569
|
|
|
|
15,434
|
|
|
|
22.8
|
|
Non-ferrous minerals:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nickel and other products(1)
|
|
|
2,802
|
|
|
|
11,789
|
|
|
|
320.7
|
|
Potash
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
24.5
|
|
Kaolin
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
|
9.2
|
|
Copper concentrate(2)
|
|
|
779
|
|
|
|
802
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
3,942
|
|
|
|
13,007
|
|
|
|
230.0
|
|
Aluminum
|
|
|
2,381
|
|
|
|
2,722
|
|
|
|
14.3
|
|
Total minerals and metals
|
|
|
16,511
|
|
|
|
28,441
|
|
|
|
72.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logistic services
|
|
|
1,376
|
|
|
|
1,525
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
Other products and services(3)
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
427
|
|
|
|
349.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross revenues
|
|
|
20,363
|
|
|
|
33,115
|
|
|
|
62.6
|
|
Value-added tax
|
|
|
(712)
|
|
|
|
(873)
|
|
|
|
22.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating revenues
|
|
US$
|
19,651
|
|
|
US$
|
32,242
|
|
|
|
64.1%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes copper, precious metals,
cobalt and other by-products produced by Vale Inco.
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Does not include copper produced by
Vale Inco.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Including coal.
|
Iron ore. Gross revenues from iron ore
increased by 18.8%, driven primarily by a 13.3% increase in
average selling prices and a 4.8% increase in the volume of iron
ore sold. The price increases resulted from a 9.5% increase in
2007 reference prices for iron ore fines, effective as of April
2007 for the majority of our customers, and a 19% increase in
2006 reference prices for iron ore fines, effective as of April
2006 for the majority of our customers. The increase in volumes
sold was made possible by the expansion of production capacity
at our Carajás mine in January 2007 and the
ramp-up of
our Brucutu mine. These production increases more than offset
the negative impact of heavy rain during the first quarter,
which slowed production in the mines and caused rail
transportation disruptions in the Southeastern System.
Iron ore pellets. Gross revenues from iron ore
pellets increased by 38.4% in 2007. Total volumes sold in 2007
were 32.8% higher than in 2006, primarily reflecting the
commencement of operations at São Luís after a
temporary shutdown in 2006. The 4.5% average price increase
resulted from a 5.28% increase in 2007 reference prices for
blast furnace and direct reduction pellets, effective as of
April 2007 for the majority of our customers, and a 3% reduction
in 2006 reference prices blast furnace and direct reduction
pellets, effective as of April 2006 for the majority of our
customers.
Manganese ore. Gross revenues from manganese
ore increased by 40%, reflecting a 52% increase in average
selling prices and 9.1% decrease in volume. The decrease in
volume was due to a temporary shutdown of our Azul mine from
July to December 2007 in order to allow the rail lines that
serve to transport our iron ore.
98
Ferroalloys. Gross revenues from ferroalloys
increased by 40.0% due to a 47.9% increase in average selling
prices, which was partially offset by a 6.5% decrease in volume
largely as a result of furnace repairs at our plant in France.
Nickel and other products. In 2007, revenues
from nickel and other products were US$11.789 billion,
compared to US$2.802 billion in 2006, when we consolidated
Vale Inco for only the last quarter of the year.
Potash. Gross revenues from sales of potash
increased by 24.5%, driven by a 35.4% increase in average
selling prices and an 8% decline in volume, reflecting problems
with mining equipment in the first half of 2007 and lower grade
of potash we mined.
Kaolin. Gross revenues from sales of kaolin
increased by 9.2%, due principally to a 18.9% increase in
average selling prices. Volume decreased by 8.2% due to problems
with machinery.
Copper concentrate. Gross revenues from sales
of copper concentrate increased by 3%, from US$779 million
in 2006 to US$802 million in 2007, due to a 4.7% increase
in average selling prices.
Aluminum. Gross revenues from aluminum
business increased by 14.3%. This reflected the following
factors:
|
|
|
|
|
A 26.2% increase in gross revenues from sales of aluminum, from
US$1.244 billion in 2006 to US$1.570 billion in 2007,
mainly driven by an 8.8% rise in average selling prices. Volume
increased by 15.9%, primarily due to the consolidation of
Valesul, which began in July 2006.
|
|
|
|
Stable gross revenues from sales of alumina at
US$1.102 billion in 2007, compared to US$1.108 billion
in 2006. Both average selling prices and volume sold remained
stable.
|
|
|
|
A 69% increase in gross revenues from sales of bauxite, from
US$29 million in 2006 to US$49 million in 2007. Volume
increased by 42.6%, reflecting MRNs increased volume
available for sale to unaffiliated customers, given the
start-up of
our Paragominas mine. Average selling prices increased by 18.5%
due to higher LME prices for aluminum, the reference price for
our bauxite sales.
|
Logistics services. Gross revenues from
logistics services increased by 10.8%. The increase reflects the
appreciation of the real, since our prices are generally
denominated in reais, as well as price increases in
reais. In particular:
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from railroad transportation increased by 20.7%, from
US$1.011 billion in 2006 to US$1.220 billion in 2007.
Average prices increased by 16.1% and volume shipped increased
by 3.9%.
|
|
|
|
Revenues from port operations increased by 2.3%, from
US$261 million in 2006 to US$267 million in 2007.
Average prices increased by 7.4%, while volume decreased by 4.4%.
|
|
|
|
Revenues from shipping decreased by 63.5%, from
US$104 million in 2006 to US$38 million in 2007, due
to the sale of our controlling interest in Log-In, which is no
longer consolidated.
|
Other products and services. Gross revenues
from other products and services increased from
US$95 million in 2006 to US$427 million in 2007,
primarily reflecting sales of coal following our acquisition of
AMCI Holdings Australia Pty.
Operating
costs and expenses
The acquisition of Vale Inco had a major impact on our operating
costs and expenses (US$2.230 billion in 2006 and
US$6.533 billion in 2007) due to the consolidation of
its operations and the accounting effect of the business
combination. Moreover, like other mining and metals companies,
we are currently experiencing higher prices for equipment,
replacement parts, energy, inputs and services. The depreciation
of the U.S. dollar
99
has increased these pressures, because of our costs denominated
in other currencies. The following table summarizes our
operating costs and expenses for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
variation
|
|
|
% change
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
attributable to
|
|
|
without
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
% change
|
|
|
Vale Inco
|
|
|
Vale Inco
|
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of ores and metals
|
|
US$
|
7,946
|
|
|
US$
|
13,628
|
|
|
|
71.5%
|
|
|
US$
|
4,303
|
|
|
|
24.1%
|
|
Cost of logistic services
|
|
|
777
|
|
|
|
853
|
|
|
|
9.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.8
|
|
Cost of aluminum products
|
|
|
1,355
|
|
|
|
1,705
|
|
|
|
25.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.8
|
|
Others
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
301.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
301.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
10,147
|
|
|
|
16,463
|
|
|
|
62.2
|
|
|
|
4,303
|
|
|
|
25.4
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
816
|
|
|
|
1,245
|
|
|
|
52.6
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
33.6
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
481
|
|
|
|
733
|
|
|
|
52.4
|
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
27.1
|
|
Other costs and expense
|
|
|
570
|
|
|
|
607
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses
|
|
US$
|
12,014
|
|
|
US$
|
19,048
|
|
|
|
58.5%
|
|
|
|
4,613
|
|
|
|
25.2%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
of goods sold
The following table summarizes the components of our cost of
goods sold for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
variation
|
|
|
% change
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
attributable to
|
|
|
without
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
% change
|
|
|
Vale Inco
|
|
|
Vale Inco
|
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outsourced services
|
|
US$
|
2,056
|
|
|
US$
|
2,628
|
|
|
|
27.8%
|
|
|
|
450
|
|
|
|
6.3%
|
|
Materials costs
|
|
|
1,584
|
|
|
|
2,313
|
|
|
|
46.0
|
|
|
|
425
|
|
|
|
21.0
|
|
Energy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel
|
|
|
912
|
|
|
|
1,406
|
|
|
|
54.2
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
29.8
|
|
Electric energy
|
|
|
623
|
|
|
|
878
|
|
|
|
40.9
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
23.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
1,535
|
|
|
|
2,284
|
|
|
|
48.8
|
|
|
|
362
|
|
|
|
27.4
|
|
Acquisition of iron ore and pellets
|
|
|
758
|
|
|
|
976
|
|
|
|
28.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28.8
|
|
Acquisition of other products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nickel
|
|
|
482
|
|
|
|
1,522
|
|
|
|
215.8
|
|
|
|
1,040
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum
|
|
|
336
|
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
(14.3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14.3)
|
|
Other
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
(11.3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11.3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
915
|
|
|
|
2,872
|
|
|
|
213.9
|
|
|
|
1,040
|
|
|
|
(13.6)
|
|
Personnel
|
|
|
917
|
|
|
|
1,873
|
|
|
|
104.3
|
|
|
|
781
|
|
|
|
24.9
|
|
Depreciation and depletion
|
|
|
899
|
|
|
|
2,049
|
|
|
|
127.9
|
|
|
|
802
|
|
|
|
44.9
|
|
Inventory adjustment
|
|
|
946
|
|
|
|
1,062
|
|
|
|
12.3
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
|
|
Others
|
|
|
537
|
|
|
|
1,382
|
|
|
|
157.4
|
|
|
|
327
|
|
|
|
39.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
US$
|
10,147
|
|
|
US$
|
16,463
|
|
|
|
62.2%
|
|
|
|
4,303
|
|
|
|
25.4%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our total cost of goods sold increased by 62.2% from 2006 to
2007. This increase resulted primarily from the following
factors:
|
|
|
|
|
Impact of Vale Inco. Of the total increase in
our cost of goods sold, US$4.303 billion represents the
difference between Vale Incos costs for the portion after
the acquisition became effective. As described above, part of
its costs (US$1.062 billion in 2007 and US$946 million
in 2006) related to the recognition of the final purchase
accounting adjustments concluded in 2007, relating to the value
of Vale Inco inventories.
|
|
|
|
Impact of depreciation of the U.S.
dollar. Because most of our costs and expenses
are denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, the
depreciation of the U.S. dollar led to higher costs as expressed
in that currency. For example, the average value of the
real against the U.S. dollar for the
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
year was 11.7% higher in 2007 than in 2006, which accounted for
US$677 million of the increase, excluding Vale Inco.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outsourced services. Vale Inco accounted for
US$450 million of outsourced services. Excluding Vale Inco,
outsourced services costs increased by 6.3% in 2007 due to
higher volumes and the depreciation of the U.S. dollar against
the real, partially offset by a decrease in outsourcing
contracts for ore and waste removal.
|
|
|
|
Material costs. Vale Inco accounted for
US$425 million of material costs. Excluding Vale Inco,
material costs increased by 21% in 2007, primarily reflecting
higher volumes, price increase and the depreciation of the U.S.
dollar against other currencies.
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of iron ore and iron ore
pellets. Cost of iron ore and iron ore pellets
purchased from other mining companies increased 28.8%. We
purchased 11.7 million metric tons of pellets from third
parties in 2007, an increase of 31.5% compared to
8.9 million metric tons purchased in 2006. This, and the
effect of increased price, were partly offset by an 18.6%
decrease in the volume of iron ore purchased from third-party
suppliers, to 8.3 million metric tons in 2007 compared to
10.2 million metric tons in 2006.
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of other products. Acquisition of
nickel products, which includes nickel concentrates for
processing under tolling contracts, intermediary products and
finished nickel, totaled US$1.522 billion in 2007.
|
|
|
|
Energy costs. Vale Inco accounted for
US$362 million of energy costs. Excluding Vale Inco, energy
costs increased by 27.4% in 2007. The increase in electricity
costs primarily reflects 8% higher electricity prices for
aluminum production under the Albras electricity contract, which
links a portion of the price to the LME price for aluminum,
while the increase in fuel costs was driven by higher production
and the depreciation of the U.S. dollar.
|
|
|
|
Personnel costs. Vale Inco accounted for
US$781 million of personnel costs. Excluding Vale Inco,
personnel costs increased by 24.9%, reflecting an increase in
the number of our employees because of the growth of our
operations and the return to in-house solutions for some
services such as ore and waste removal at our iron ore mines,
and the impact of the 2007 wage increases.
|
|
|
|
Other costs. The increase of
US$845 million is mainly due to payments of royalties and
the consolidation of Taiwan Nickel Refining Company
(TNRC) beginning in the fourth quarter of 2007. We
have a 49.9% stake of TNRC, but since we are the only supplier
of nickel feed to TNRC, we consolidated it in accordance with
Interpretation 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest
Entities, an Interpretation of ARB No. 51 (FIN 46),
issued in January 2003 and revised in December 2003
(FIN 46-R)
by the Financial Accounting Standard Board.
|
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by 52.6%.
Vale Inco accounted for US$175 million in selling, general
and administrative expenses. Excluding the impact of Vale Inco,
selling, general and administrative expenses increased by
US$254 million, as a result of higher selling expenses due
to the increase in sales volume, advertising (including
US$74 million related to the launch of the Vale brand) and
the appreciation of the other currencies against the U.S. dollar.
Research
and development expenses
Research and development expenses increased by 52.4%. Of the
US$252 million increase, US$132 million was
attributable to Vale Inco. The remainder of the increase
primarily reflects an increase in mineral exploration and
project studies in several regions, including South America,
Asia, Africa and Australia.
101
Operating
income by segment
The following table provides information concerning our
operating income by segment and as a percentage of revenues for
the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Segment operating income
(loss)
|
|
|
Segment operating income
(loss)
|
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
(% of net operating
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
(% of net operating
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
revenues)
|
|
|
|
|
|
revenues)
|
|
|
Ferrous minerals:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iron ore
|
|
US$
|
5,168
|
|
|
|
53.0%
|
|
|
US$
|
6,325
|
|
|
|
54.4%
|
|
Pellets
|
|
|
630
|
|
|
|
33.3
|
|
|
|
659
|
|
|
|
25.3
|
|
Manganese ore
|
|
|
(49)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ferroalloys
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
28.0
|
|
Non-ferrous minerals:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nickel and other products
|
|
|
411
|
|
|
|
14.7
|
|
|
|
4,785
|
|
|
|
40.6
|
|
Potash
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
20.7
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
22.0
|
|
Kaolin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copper concentrate
|
|
|
464
|
|
|
|
61.1
|
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
32.6
|
|
Aluminum:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alumina and bauxite
|
|
|
294
|
|
|
|
26.0
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
13.9
|
|
Aluminum
|
|
|
631
|
|
|
|
51.9
|
|
|
|
668
|
|
|
|
44.3
|
|
Logistics:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Railroads
|
|
|
274
|
|
|
|
32.9
|
|
|
|
297
|
|
|
|
29.1
|
|
Ports
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
29.5
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
Ships
|
|
|
(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Others
|
|
|
(275)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(140)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
US$
|
7,637
|
|
|
|
38.9%
|
|
|
US$
|
13,194
|
|
|
|
40.9%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our operating income increased as a percentage of net operating
revenues from 38.9% in 2006 to 40.9% in 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
This increase was driven primarily by increases in the margins
on our iron ore, nickel, ferroalloys and potash businesses,
which, together with the impact of consolidating Vale Inco and
its operating margin of 40.6%, more than offset lower margins in
our iron ore pellets, copper, alumina, aluminum and port
businesses.
|
|
|
|
The increase in margins in our iron ore business primarily
reflects higher average selling prices, which more than offset
the impact of the appreciation of the real against the
U.S. dollar, higher research and development expenditures and
higher depreciation charges due to the expansion of our asset
base.
|
|
|
|
The increased operating margin for nickel and other products
reflects in part the impact of the purchase accounting
adjustments relating to inventories described above, which
adversely affected margins in 2006 to a much greater degree than
in 2007. This will not affect our results in 2008.
|
|
|
|
The margin declines in the alumina, aluminum and port operations
segments resulted primarily from price increases of significant
inputs such as electricity, oil, coking coal and pitch, a
decrease in the average selling price of alumina, and the
appreciation of the real against the U.S. dollar.
|
|
|
|
The margin declines in the copper concentrate segment resulted
primarily from higher costs due to lower copper grades and the
appreciation of the real against the U.S. dollar.
|
|
|
|
The significant margin increases in the ferroalloys segment are
due to higher average prices.
|
102
Non-operating
income (expenses)
The following table details our net non-operating income
(expenses) for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
Financial income
|
|
US$
|
327
|
|
|
US$
|
295
|
|
Financial expenses
|
|
|
(1,338)
|
|
|
|
(1,592)
|
|
Foreign exchange and monetary gains, net
|
|
|
529
|
|
|
|
2,559
|
|
Gain on sale of investments
|
|
|
674
|
|
|
|
777
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-operating income
|
|
US$
|
192
|
|
|
US$
|
2,039
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We had net non-operating revenues of US$2.039 billion in
2007, compared to net non-operating revenues of
US$192 million in 2006. This change primarily reflects:
|
|
|
|
|
Higher exchange gains due to the higher average level of net
U.S. dollar-denominated liabilities resulting from the Inco
acquisition combined with the depreciation of the U.S. dollar.
|
|
|
|
A decrease in financial income, due mainly to lower average cash
balances.
|
|
|
|
An increase in financial expenses, principally due to the
increase in average debt resulting from the Inco acquisition.
This was largely offset by a gain of US$925 million in
derivative transactions that we entered into, including a swap
of real-denominated debt into U.S. dollar (gain of
US$791 million) and a swap hedging some of our personnel
costs from reais into dollars (gain of
US$127 million).
|
|
|
|
US$777 million gain on sale of investments in 2007,
including the sale of our interests in Usiminas
(US$456 million gain), Log-In (US$238 million gain)
and Lion Ore Mining (US$80 million gain).
|
Income
taxes
In 2007, we recorded net income tax expense of
US$3.201 billion, compared to US$1.432 billion in
2006. The effective tax rate on our pre-tax income was 21% in
2007 and 18.3% in 2006. Our effective tax rate is lower than the
statutory rate because (i) income of some non-Brazilian
subsidiaries is subject to lower rates of tax, (ii) we are
entitled under Brazilian law to deduct the amount of our
distributions to shareholders that we classify for tax purposes
as interest on shareholders equity and (iii) we
benefit from tax incentives applicable to our earnings on
production in certain regions of Brazil.
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Overview
In the ordinary course of business, our principal funding
requirements are for capital expenditures, dividend payments and
debt service. We have historically met these requirements by
using cash generated from operating activities and through
borrowings. In 2008, we also raised US$12.2 billion in a
global equity offering. For 2009, we have budgeted capital
expenditures of US$14.235 billion and announced minimum
dividend payments of US$2.5 billion. We expect our
operating cash flow and cash holdings to be sufficient to meet
these anticipated requirements.
We also regularly review acquisition and investment
opportunities, and when suitable opportunities arise we make
selected acquisitions and investments to implement our business
strategy. We may fund these investments with internally
generated funds or with borrowings, supplemented in some cases
by dispositions.
103
Sources
of funds
Our principal sources of funds are operating cash flow and
borrowings, which we supplemented in 2008 with our global equity
offering.
Our operating activities generated cash flows of
US$17.1 billion in 2008. Operating cash flows have grown
steadily in recent years, driven by the growth in our sales
volumes and by rising prices.
At December 31, 2008, we had available committed revolving
credit lines totaling US$1.9 billion, of which
US$1.15 billion was granted to Vale International and the
balance to Vale Inco. As of December 31, 2008, neither Vale
International nor Vale Inco had drawn any amounts under these
facilities, and US$101 million of letters of credit were
issued and outstanding pursuant to Vale Incos facility.
In April 2008, we entered into a credit line for investment with
BNDES for R$7.3 billion, or approximately
US$3.12 billion, of which we have drawn US$211 million.
During 2008, we signed framework agreements with the Japan Bank
for International Cooperation (JBIC) and Nippon
Export and Investment Insurance (NEXI) for the
financing of mining, logistics and power-generation projects.
These agreements represent US$5.0 billion of long-term
financing. We are also negotiating similar agreements with other
agencies and have already signed a memorandum of understanding
with the Export-Import Bank of Korea (KEXIM), the
Korean official credit agency for export and import financing.
Uses of
funds
Capital
expenditures
Capital expenditures amounted to US$10.319 billion in 2008,
and we have budgeted US$14.235 billion for 2009. Our actual
capital expenditures may differ from the budgeted amount for a
variety of reasons, including changes in exchange rates. Our
capital expenditures figures include some amounts that are
treated as current expense for accounting purposes, such as
project development, maintenance of existing assets, and
research and development. For more information about the
specific projects for which we have budgeted funds, see
Item 4. Information on the companyCapital
expenditures.
Distributions
We paid total dividends of US$2.850 billion in 2008
(including distributions classified for tax purposes as interest
on shareholders equity). The minimum dividend announced
for 2009 is US$2.5 billion. The first installment of this
dividend, in the amount of US$1.250 billion, will be paid
on April 30, 2008. See Item 8. Financial
informationDistributions.
In 2008, we also paid US$142 million of total interest
(quarterly interest plus additional interest based
on cash distributions in respect of ADSs) on our mandatorily
convertible notes.
Debt
At December 31, 2008, we had aggregate outstanding debt of
US$18.245 billion. Our outstanding long-term debt
(including the current portion of long-term debt and accrued
charges) was US$18.168 billion, compared with
US$18.857 billion at the end of 2007. At December 31,
2008, US$504 million of our debt was secured by liens on
some of our assets. At December 31, 2008, the average debt
maturity was 9.28 years, compared with 10.7 years in
2007.
For information about our management of interest rate and
currency risk on our debt, see Item 11. Quantitative and
qualitative disclosures about market risk.
We are currently rated BBB+ (Standard & Poors),
Baa2 (Moodys), BBB high (Dominion) and
BBB- (Fitch).
104
In general, our short-term debt consists primarily of U.S.
dollar-denominated trade financing, mainly in the form of export
prepayments and export sales advances with financial
institutions. At December 31, 2008, we had no outstanding
short-term debt.
Our major categories of long-term indebtedness are as follows.
The amounts given below include the current portion of long-term
debt and exclude accrued charges.
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollar-denominated loans and financing
(US$6.115 billion at December 31, 2008).
These loans include export financing lines, import
finance from export credit agencies, and loans from commercial
banks and multilateral organizations. The largest facility is a
pre-export financing facility, linked to future receivables from
export sales, that was originally entered into in the amount of
US$6.0 billion as part of the refinancing of the Inco
acquisition debt. The outstanding amount at December 31,
2008 was US$3.9 billion.
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollar-denominated fixed rate notes
(US$6.510 billion at December 31,
2008). We have issued through public offerings
several series of fixed rate debt securities through our finance
subsidiary Vale Overseas Limited with a Vale guarantee in the
amount of US$5.385 billion. Our subsidiary Vale Inco has
issued fixed rate debt in the amount of US$1.125 billion.
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollar-denominated loans secured by future export
receivables (US$204 million at December 31,
2008). We have a US$400 million
securitization program based on existing and future receivables
generated by our subsidiary CVRD Finance from exports of iron
ore and iron ore pellets to six of our customers in Europe, Asia
and the United States.
|
|
|
|
Real-denominated non-convertible debentures
(US$2.562 billion at December 31,
2008). In November 2006, we issued
non-convertible debentures in the amount of approximately
US$2.6 billion, in two series, with four- and seven-year
maturities. The first series, approximately US$700 million
at issuance, matures in 2010 and bears interest at 101.75% of
the accumulated variation of the Brazilian CDI (interbank
certificate of deposit) interest rate. The second series,
approximately US$1.9 billion at issuance, matures in 2013
and bears interest at the Brazilian CDI interest rate plus 0.25%
per year. At December 31, 2008, the total amount of these
two series was US$2.353 billion.
|
|
|
|
Perpetual notes (US$83 million at December 31,
2008). We have issued perpetual notes that are
exchangeable for 48.000 billion preferred shares of MRN.
Interest is payable on the notes in an amount equal to dividends
paid on the underlying preferred shares.
|
|
|
|
Other debt (US$2.383 billion at December 31,
2008). We have outstanding debt, principally owed
to BNDES and Brazilian commercial banks, and loans and financing
in other currencies.
|
Some of our long-term debt instruments contain financial
covenants. Our principal covenants require us to maintain
certain ratios, such as debt to equity, net debt to EBITDA and
interest coverage. We were in full compliance with our financial
covenants as of December 31, 2008, and we believe that our
existing covenants will not significantly restrict our ability
to borrow additional funds as needed to meet our capital
requirements. We believe we will be able to operate within the
terms of our financial covenants for the foreseeable future.
None of these covenants directly restricts our ability to pay
dividends on equity securities at the parent-company level.
Shareholder
Debentures
At the time of the first stage of our privatization in 1997, we
issued shareholder revenue interests known in Brazil as
debentures participativas to our
then-existing shareholders. The terms of the debentures were
established to ensure that our pre-privatization shareholders,
including the Brazilian government, would participate alongside
us in potential future financial benefits that we derive from
exploiting certain mineral resources that were not taken into
account in determining the minimum purchase price of our shares
in the privatization. In accordance with the debentures deed,
holders have the right to receive semi-annual payments
105
equal to an agreed percentage of our net revenues (revenues less
value-added tax, transport fee and insurance expenses related to
the trading of the products) from certain identified mineral
resources that we owned at the time of the privatization, to the
extent that we exceed defined thresholds of sales volume
relating to certain mineral resources, and from the sale of
mineral rights that we owned at that time. Our obligation to
make payments to the holders will cease when the relevant
mineral resources are exhausted.
The total payments made under the shareholder debentures
amounted to US$6 million in 2006, US$11 million in
2007 and US$11 million in 2008. See Note 20 to our
consolidated financial statements for a description of the terms
of the debentures.
CONTRACTUAL
OBLIGATIONS
The following table summarizes our long-term debt, short-term
debt, operating lease obligations, purchase obligations and
take-or-pay
obligations of our subsidiary MRN at December 31, 2008.
This table excludes other common non-contractual obligations
that we may have, including pension obligations, deferred tax
liabilities and contingent obligations arising from uncertain
tax positions, all of which are discussed in the notes to our
consolidated financial statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments due by period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 year
|
|
|
2010-2011
|
|
|
2012-2013
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt(1)
|
|
US$
|
17,857
|
|
|
US$
|
322
|
|
|
US$
|
4,922
|
|
|
US$
|
3,693
|
|
|
US$
|
8,920
|
|
Short-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest payments(2)
|
|
|
12,595
|
|
|
|
1,161
|
|
|
|
2,108
|
|
|
|
1,868
|
|
|
|
7,458
|
|
Operating lease obligations(3)
|
|
|
2,238
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
|
1,568
|
|
Ferrovia Norte Sul S.A. subconcession
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase obligations(4)
|
|
|
13,520
|
|
|
|
4,170
|
|
|
|
2,662
|
|
|
|
1,398
|
|
|
|
5,290
|
|
Take-or-pay
obligation (MRN)(5)
|
|
|
1,041
|
|
|
|
281
|
|
|
|
378
|
|
|
|
382
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
US$
|
47,651
|
|
|
US$
|
6,468
|
|
|
US$
|
10,338
|
|
|
US$
|
7,609
|
|
|
US$
|
23,236
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Amounts include the current portion
of long-term debt and do not include accrued charges.
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Consists of estimated future
payments of interest on our loans, financings and debentures,
calculated based on interest rates and foreign exchange rates
applicable at December 31, 2008 and assuming (i) that
all amortization payments and payments at maturity on our loans,
financings and debentures will be made on their scheduled
payments dates, and (ii) that our perpetual bonds are
redeemed on the first permitted redemption date.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Amounts include fixed payments
related to the operating lease contracts for the pelletizing
plants.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Obligations to purchase materials.
Amounts are based on contracted prices, except for purchases of
iron ore from mining companies located in Brazil, which are
based on 2008 average prices.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Our subsidiary Alunorte is
committed under a
take-or-pay
agreement to purchase bauxite from MRN at a price that is
determined by a formula based on prevailing world prices of
aluminum. The values in the table are based on year-end 2008
prices.
|
OFF-BALANCE
SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
At December 31, 2008, our off-balance sheet arrangements
consisted primarily of the following items. For more information
on our off-balance sheet arrangements see Note 20 to our
consolidated financial statements.
|
|
|
|
|
Sumic Nickel Netherlands B.V. (Sumic), owner of 21%
of the shares of Goro, has a put option to sell to Vale Inco
25%, 50%, or 100% of its shares of Goro. The put option can be
exercised if the cost of the Goro project exceeds
US$4.2 billion at projected exchange rates and an agreement
cannot be reached on how to proceed with the project.
|
|
|
|
We provided a guarantee to cover potential termination payments
under an energy supply agreement for the Goro project. The
amount of any termination payment depends on a number of
factors, including the date of any termination. The maximum
amount of any termination payment would be
145 million, decreasing over the term of the
agreement.
|
106
|
|
|
|
|
We provided certain guarantees on behalf of Goro in connection
with the Girardin tax-advantaged lease financing. We guaranteed
payments due from Goro of up to a maximum amount of
US$100 million in connection with an indemnity, and
provided an additional guarantee covering the payments due from
Goro of (a) amounts exceeding the maximum amount in
connection with the indemnity and (b) certain other amounts
payable by Goro under a lease agreement covering certain assets.
|
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
We believe that the following are our critical accounting
policies. We consider an accounting policy to be critical if it
is important to our financial condition and results of
operations and if it requires significant judgments and
estimates on the part of our management. For a summary of all of
our significant accounting policies, see Note 3 to our
consolidated financial statements.
Mineral
reserves and useful life of mines
We regularly evaluate and update our estimates of proven and
probable mineral reserves. Our proven and probable mineral
reserves are determined using generally accepted estimation
techniques. Calculating our reserves requires us to make
assumptions about future conditions that are highly uncertain,
including future ore prices, currency prices, inflation rates,
mining technology, availability of permits and production costs.
Changes in some or all of these assumptions could have a
significant impact on our recorded proven and probable reserves.
One of the ways we make our ore reserve estimates is to
determine the mine closure dates used in recording the fair
value of our asset retirement obligations for environmental and
site reclamation costs and the periods over which we amortize
our mining assets. Any change in our estimates of total expected
future mine or asset lives could have an impact on the
depreciation, depletion and amortization charges recorded in our
consolidated financial statements under cost of goods sold.
Changes in the estimated lives of our mines could also
significantly impact our estimates of environmental and site
reclamation costs, which are described in greater detail below.
Environmental
and site reclamation costs
Expenditures relating to ongoing compliance with environmental
regulations are charged against earnings or capitalized as
appropriate. These ongoing programs are designed to minimize the
environmental impact of our activities.
SFAS 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement
Obligations, requires that we recognize a liability for
the fair value of our estimated asset retirement obligations in
the period in which they are incurred, if a reasonable estimate
can be made. We consider the accounting estimates related to
reclamation and closure costs to be critical accounting
estimates because:
|
|
|
|
|
we will not incur most of these costs for a number of years,
requiring us to make estimates over a long period;
|
|
|
|
reclamation and closure laws and regulations could change in the
future or circumstances affecting our operations could change,
either of which could result in significant changes to our
current plans;
|
|
|
|
calculating the fair value of our asset retirement obligations
in accordance with SFAS 143 requires us to assign
probabilities to projected cash flows, to make long-term
assumptions about inflation rates, to determine our
credit-adjusted risk-free interest rates and to determine market
risk premiums that are appropriate for our operations; and
|
|
|
|
given the significance of these factors in the determination of
our estimated environmental and site reclamation costs, changes
in any or all of these estimates could have a material impact on
net income. In particular, given the long periods over which
many of these charges are discounted to
|
107
|
|
|
|
|
present value, changes in our assumptions about credit-adjusted
risk-free interest rates could have a significant impact on the
size of our provision.
|
Our Environmental Department defines the rules and procedures
that should be used to evaluate our asset retirement
obligations. The future costs of retirement of all of our mines
and sites are reviewed annually, considering the actual stage of
exhaustion and the projected exhaustion date of each mine and
site. The future estimated retirement costs are discounted to
present value using a credit-adjusted risk-free interest rate.
At December 31, 2008, we estimated the fair value of our
aggregate total asset retirement obligations to be
US$887 million.
Impairment
of long-lived assets and goodwill
We have made acquisitions that included a significant amount of
goodwill, as well as intangible and tangible assets. Under
generally accepted accounting principles, except for goodwill
and indefinite-life intangible assets, all long-lived assets,
including these acquired assets, are amortized over their
estimated useful lives, and are tested to determine if they are
recoverable from operating earnings on an undiscounted cash flow
basis over their useful lives whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be
recoverable. Factors that could trigger an impairment review
include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
significant underperformance relating to expected historical or
projected future operating results of entities or business units;
|
|
|
|
significant changes in the manner in which we use the acquired
assets or our overall business strategy; or
|
|
|
|
significant negative industry or economic trends.
|
When we determine that the carrying value of definite-life
intangible assets and long-lived assets may not be recoverable
based upon verification of one or more of the above indicators
of impairment, we measure any impairment loss based on a
projected discounted cash flow method using a discount rate
determined by our management to be commensurate with the risk
inherent in our current business model.
We are required to assign goodwill to reporting units and to
test each reporting units goodwill for impairment at least
annually and whenever circumstances indicating that recognized
goodwill might not be fully recovered are identified. In the
first step of a goodwill impairment test, we compare a reporting
units fair value with its carrying amount to identify any
potential goodwill impairment loss. If the carrying amount of a
reporting unit exceeds the units fair value, we must carry
out the second step of the impairment test to measure the
amount, if any, of the units goodwill impairment loss.
Goodwill arising from a business combination with a continuing
non-controlling interest must be tested for impairment by using
an approach that is consistent with the approach that the entity
used to measure the non-controlling interest at the acquisition
date. For equity investees we determine annually whether there
is an
other-than-temporary
decline in the fair value of the investment.
Following the downturn in the economy, which contributed to the
decline in the prices of certain commodities produced by us
during the last quarter of 2008, we updated our impairment test
initiated during the fourth quarter and performed throughout the
preparation of our 2008 annual financial statements, based on
revised forecasted discounted cash flows. As a result, we
determined that the goodwill associated with the acquisition of
Vale Inco, included within the reportable segment
Non-ferrous nickel, was partially
impaired. The impairment charge recorded in operating results in
the fourth quarter of 2008 was US$950 million. At
December 31, 2008, we had US$1.9 billion of goodwill.
For impairment test purposes, management determined discounted
cash flows based on approved budget assumptions. Gross margin
projections were based on past performance and managements
expectations of market developments. Information about sales
prices is consistent with the forecasts included in industry
reports, taking into account quoted prices when available and
appropriate. The discount rates used reflect
108
specific risks relating to the relevant assets in each reporting
unit, depending on their composition and location.
Recognition of additional goodwill impairment charges in the
future would depend on several estimates, including market
conditions, recent actual results and managements
forecasts. This information will be obtained when our assessment
is updated during the fourth quarter of 2009, or earlier if
impairment indicators are identified.
It is not possible at this time to determine whether an
impairment charge will be taken in the future and if it were to
be taken, whether such charge would be material. However, if the
global economy remains depressed, we could potentially face
additional goodwill impairment charges.
Derivatives
SFAS 133, Accounting for Derivative Financial
Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended by
SFAS 137, SFAS 138 and SFAS 149, requires that we
recognize all derivative financial instruments as either assets
or liabilities on our balance sheet and measure such instruments
at fair value. Changes in the fair value of derivatives are
recorded in each period in current earnings or in other
comprehensive income (outside net income), in the latter case
depending on whether a transaction is designated as an effective
cash flow hedge. Fair value adjustments to our derivatives are
recorded in current net income, unless designated as cash flow
hedges, as permitted under SFAS 133. The corresponding
unrealized fair value adjustments to cash flow hedges are
recognized directly to shareholders equity. We use
well-known market participants valuation methodologies to
compute the fair value of instruments. To evaluate the financial
instruments, we use estimates and judgments related to present
values, taking into account market curves, projected interest
rates, exchange rates, forward market prices and their
respective volatilities, when applicable. We consider
non-performance risk on financial instruments and derivative
transactions that are executed with financial institutions that
we consider to have a high credit quality. The exposure limits
to financial institutions are proposed annually by the Executive
Risk Committee and approved by the Executive Board. The
financial institutions credit risk tracking is performed
making use of a credit risk valuation methodology that
considers, among other information, published ratings provided
by international rating agencies and other management judgments.
At December 31, 2008, we did not have any derivative
instruments designated as cash flow hedges. In 2008, we recorded
to the income statement unrealized losses of US$811 million
in relation to fair value adjustments on derivative instruments.
Income
taxes
In accordance with SFAS 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes, we recognize deferred tax effects of tax losses
carryforward and temporary differences in our consolidated
financial statements. We record a valuation allowance when we
believe that it is more likely than not that tax assets will not
be fully recoverable in the future.
When we prepare our consolidated financial statements, we
estimate our income taxes based on regulations in the various
jurisdictions where we conduct business. This requires us to
estimate our actual current tax exposure and to assess temporary
differences that result from deferring treatment of certain
items for tax and accounting purposes. These differences result
in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which we show on our
consolidated balance sheet. We must then assess the likelihood
that our deferred tax assets will be recovered from future
taxable income. To the extent we believe that recovery is not
likely, we establish a valuation allowance. When we establish a
valuation allowance or increase this allowance in an accounting
period, we record a tax expense in our statement of income. When
we reduce the valuation allowance, we record a tax benefit in
our statement of income.
Determining our provision for income taxes, our deferred tax
assets and liabilities and any valuation allowance to be
recorded against our net deferred tax assets requires
significant management judgment, estimates and assumptions about
matters that are highly uncertain. For each income tax asset, we
evaluate the likelihood of whether some portion or the entire
asset will not be realized. The valuation allowance made in
109
relation to accumulated tax losses carryforward depends on our
assessment of the probability of generation of future taxable
profits within the legal entity in which the related deferred
tax asset is recorded based on our production and sales plans,
selling prices, operating costs, environmental costs, group
restructuring plans for subsidiaries and site reclamation costs
and planned capital costs.
Contingencies
We disclose material contingent liabilities unless the
possibility of any loss arising is considered remote, and we
disclose material contingent assets where the inflow of economic
benefits is probable. We discuss our material contingencies in
Note 20 to our financial statements.
We account for contingencies in accordance with SFAS 5,
Accounting for Contingencies, which requires that we
record an estimated loss from a loss contingency when
information available prior to the issuance of our financial
statements indicates that it is probable that a future event
will confirm that an asset has been impaired or a liability has
been incurred at the date of the financial statements, and the
amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. In particular,
given the nature of Brazilian tax legislation, the assessment of
potential tax liabilities requires significant management
judgment. By their nature, contingencies will only be resolved
when one or more future events occurs or fails to occur, and
typically those events will occur a number of years in the
future. Assessing such liabilities, particularly in the
Brazilian legal environment, inherently involves the exercise of
significant management judgment and estimates of the outcome of
future events.
The provision for contingencies at December 31, 2008,
totaling US$1.685 billion, consists of provisions of
US$458 million, US$386 million, US$828 million
and US$13 million for labor, civil, tax and other claims,
respectively.
Employee
post-retirement benefits
We sponsor a defined benefit pension plan covering some of our
employees. We account for these benefits in accordance with
SFAS No. 132, Employers Disclosure about
Pensions and Other
Post-Retirement
Benefits and SFAS No. 158, Employees
Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other
Post-Retirement
Plans, as amended.
The determination of the amount of our obligations for pension
benefits depends on certain actuarial assumptions. These
assumptions are described in Note 18 to our consolidated
financial statements and include, among others, the expected
long-term rate of return on plan assets and increases in
salaries. In accordance with U.S. GAAP, actual results that
differ from our assumptions and are not a component of net
benefit costs for the year are recorded in other comprehensive
income (loss).
Item 6. Directors,
senior management and employees
BOARD OF
DIRECTORS
Overview
Our Board of Directors sets general guidelines and policies for
our business and monitors the implementation of those guidelines
and policies by our executive officers. The Board of Directors
holds regularly scheduled meetings on a monthly basis and holds
additional meetings when called by its chairman, vice-chairman
or any two directors. Decisions of the Board of Directors
require a quorum of a majority of the directors and are taken by
majority vote.
Under Brazilian corporate law, the board of directors must have
at least three members. Each director and his or her respective
alternate, who must be a shareholder of Vale, are elected at a
general shareholders meeting and are subject to removal at
any time. Our bylaws state that the Board of Directors consists
of eleven members and eleven alternates. Our employees have the
right to appoint one director and an alternate. Members of the
Board of Directors are elected for two-year terms and can be
re-elected. Each alternate
110
director serves on behalf of a specific board member. In the
absence of the director for whom an alternate director is
acting, that alternate director may attend and vote at meetings
of the Board of Directors.
Nine of our 11 current directors and nine of our current
alternate directors were appointed to their positions by
Valepar, our controlling shareholder, pursuant to Valepars
shareholders agreement and the provisions of Brazilian
corporate law. For a description of the procedures under which
our directors are elected, see Item 10.
Additional informationMemorandum and articles of
incorporationCommon shares and preferred
sharesGeneral. For a description of Valepars
shareholders agreement, see Item 7. Major
shareholders and related party transactionsMajor
shareholdersControlling shareholder.
Directors
of Vale
The following table lists the current members of the Board of
Directors. All of our directors were elected or re-elected, as
the case may be, at our annual shareholders meeting in
April 2009. The terms of all of our directors will expire in
2011. The alternate position corresponding to Mr. Francisco
Augusto da Costa e Silva is vacant.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year first elected
|
|
|
Position
|
|
Age
|
|
|
Sérgio Ricardo Silva Rosa(1)
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
Chairman
|
|
|
49
|
|
Mário da Silveira Teixeira Júnior(1)
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
Vice-Chairman
|
|
|
63
|
|
José Ricardo Sasseron(1)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
52
|
|
Jorge Luiz Pacheco(1)
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
54
|
|
Sandro Kohler Marcondes(1)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
45
|
|
Renato da Cruz Gomes(1)
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
56
|
|
Ken Abe(1)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
61
|
|
Oscar Augusto de Camargo Filho(1)
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
71
|
|
Luciano Galvão Coutinho(1)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
62
|
|
Eduardo Fernando Jardim Pinto(2)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
46
|
|
Francisco Augusto da Costa e Silva(3)
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Appointed by Valepar and approved
at the shareholders meeting.
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Appointed by our employees and
approved at the shareholders meeting.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Nominated by Vales
non-controlling shareholders in 2005 and reappointed in 2007 and
2009.
|
The following table lists the alternate members of the Board of
Directors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year first elected
|
|
|
Position
|
|
|
Age
|
|
|
Luiz Felix de Freitas(1)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Alternate Director
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
João Moisés de Oliveira(1)
|
|
|
2000
|
|
|
|
Alternate Director
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
Rita de Cássia Paz Andrade Robles(1)
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Alternate Director
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
Deli Soares Pereira(1)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Alternate Director
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
Luiz Augusto Ckless Silva(1)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Alternate Director
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
Luiz Carlos de Freitas(1)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Alternate Director
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
Hidehiro Takahashi(1)
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Alternate Director
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
Wanderlei Viçoso Fagundes(1)
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
Alternate Director
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
Paulo Sérgio Moreira da Fonseca
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Alternate Director
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
Raimundo Nonato Alves Amorim(2)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Alternate Director
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Appointed by Valepar and approved
at the shareholders meeting.
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Appointed by our employees and
approved at the shareholders meeting.
|
Below is a summary of the business experience, areas of
expertise, and principal outside business interests of our
current directors.
Sérgio Ricardo Silva Rosa. Mr. Rosa
joined our Board of Directors in April 2003 and was designated
as chairman in May 2003. Mr. Rosa is currently the chief
executive officer of Caixa de Previdência dos
111
Funcionários do Banco do Brasil (Previ), where
he has been an executive officer since 2000. He is also a
director and chief executive officer of Valepar and chief
executive officer of Litel Participações S.A.
Mr. Rosa has been a director of Brasil Telecom
Participações since December 2000, and of Sauípe
S.A. since May 2001. Prior to joining Previ, Mr. Rosa
served as president of the Confederação Nacional dos
Bancários from June 1994 to May 2000. From January 1995 to
December 1996, Mr. Rosa was an alderman of the municipality
of São Paulo. He received his degree in journalism from the
Universidade de São Paulo.
Mário da Silveira Teixeira
Júnior. Mr. Teixeira joined our Board
of Directors in April 2003, and was designated vice-chairman in
May 2003. He started his career at Bradesco Organization in July
1971, at Bradesco S.A Corretora de Títulos e Valores
Mobiliários, and served as an officer there from March 1983
to January 1984; he was subsequently transferred to Banco
Bradesco de Investimento S.A. and Banco Bradesco S.A
(Banco Bradesco). At Banco Bradesco, he was elected
department director in January 1984; executive managing officer
in March 1992 and executive vice-president in March 1998. He was
also a member of the board of directors of Banco Bradesco from
March 1999 to July 2001, when he resigned to preside over
Bradespar S.A., a company created after partial spin-off of
Banco Bradesco. He returned as member of the board directors of
Banco Bradesco in March 2002, a position he holds to date.
Currently, he is a member of the board of directors of Bradesco
Leasing S.A.Arrendamento Mercantil. He is a member of the
managing body and managing director of Fundação
Bradesco. He is also a member of the board of directors and
managing director of Foundation Institute for Digestive System
and Nutrition Diseases (FIMADEN). In addition to
these activities, he is member of the board of directors of
Bradespar S.A., vice-chairman of the board of directors of
Valepar S.A., and a sitting member of the board of directors of
Banco Espírito Santo de Investimentos S.A., headquartered
in Lisbon, Portugal. He was executive vice-president of the
National Association of the Investment Banks
(ANBID); member of the board of directors of the
Brazilian Association of Publicly-Held Companies
(ABRASCA); vice-chairman of the board of directors
of BES Investimento do BrasilBanco de Investimento, member
of the board of directors of Companhia Paulista de Força e
LuzCPFL, Companhia Piratininga de Força e Luz,
Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional, CPFL Energia S.A., CPFL
Geração de Energia S.A., Latasa S.A., São Paulo
Alpargatas S.A., Tigre S.A. Tubos e Conexões, VBC Energia
S.A. and VBC Participações S.A. He received his degree
in civil engineering and business administration.
José Ricardo Sasseron. Mr. Sasseron
joined our Board of Directors in April 2007. Mr. Sasseron
is currently an officer of Previ. He began his career in 1980 at
Banco do Brasil S.A. (Banco do Brasil). From 1996 to 1998, he
was chairman of the fiscal council of Previ. Since 2001, he has
been a member of the Conselho de Gestão e Previdência
Complementar (CGPC) and president of the
Associação Nacional dos Participantes de Fundo de
Pensão (ANAPAR). From 2005 to 2007, he was
chairman of the board of directors of Sauípe S.A., and in
2004 he returned to Previ, where he was a member of the
Conselho Deliberativo until 2006. He received his degree
in history from the Universidade de São Paulo.
Jorge Luiz Pacheco. Mr. Pacheco joined
our Board of Directors in April 2003. Mr. Pacheco has been
manager of strategic investments at Previ since December 2000.
From 1973 to 2000, he worked at Banco do Brasil. He has also
served as a director of Valepar and an officer of Litel, and has
held an officer position in the fiscal council of Companhia
Siderúrgica Belgo-Mineira. He received his degree in
economics from Universidade Cândido Mendes, and
post-graduate degrees in finance and business management from
Instituto Brasileiro de Mercado de Capitais (IBMEC)
in Rio de Janeiro.
Sandro Kohler Marcondes. Mr. Marcondes
joined our Board of Directors in April 2007. He is currently an
officer of Banco do Brasil, where he has worked in various
capacities both in Brazil and abroad since 1982. Since 2005, he
has been an officer of BB Leasing, Banco do Brasil Securities in
New York, BB Securities in London and BB Tur. Mr. Marcondes
received his bachelors degree in business administration
from the Universidade Estadual de Guarapuava and a masters
degree from Fundação Getúlio Vargas in São
Paulo.
Renato da Cruz Gomes. Mr. Gomes joined
our Board of Directors in April 2001. Mr. Gomes has been an
executive officer of Bradespar S.A. since 2000. From 1976 to
2000, Mr. Gomes held a variety of positions at BNDES and he
has served on the boards of directors of Aracruz Celulose S.A.,
Iochpe Maxion S.A., Bahia
112
Sul Celulose S.A., Globo Cabo S.A. and Latasa. He was also a
member of the advisory board of Fator SinergiaFundo de
Investimento de Valores Mobiliários em Ações and
the investment committee of Bradesco Templeton Value and
Liquidity Fund. Mr. Gomes has been an executive officer of
Valepar since April 2001 and is a member of Valepars board
of directors. He received his degree in engineering from the
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, and his post-graduate
degree in management development from Sociedade de
Desenvolvimento Empresarial (SDE).
Ken Abe. Mr. Abe joined our Board of
Directors in April 2009. From October 2003 to April 2006,
Mr. Abe served as member of the board of directors of
Valepar. He joined Mitsui & Co., Ltd. in 1970, where
he has held a variety of positions, and is currently its
executive director, executive vice-president. Mr. Abe has a
degree in economics from Waseda University.
Oscar Augusto de Camargo
Filho. Mr. Camargo Filho joined our Board of
Directors in October 2003. He is currently a partner of CWH
Consultoria Empresarial. From 1999 to 2003, Mr. Camargo
Filho served as chairman of the board of directors of MRS. From
1973 to 2003, he held various positions with
CAEMIMineração e Metalurgia S.A.
(CAEMI), including chief executive officer and
member of its board of directors. From 1963 until 1973, he held
a variety of positions at Motores Perkins S.A., including
commercial officer and sales and services manager. He received
his law degree from the Universidade de São Paulo.
Luciano Galvão
Coutinho. Mr. Coutinho joined our Board of
Directors in August 2007. Mr. Coutinho is the president of
BNDES. He holds a Ph.D. in economics from Cornell University and
is an invited professor at Universidade Estadual de Campinas
(UNICAMP). A specialist in international and
industrial economics, he has written and edited several books
and articles, that have been published in Brazil and abroad. In
1994, Mr. Coutinho coordinated a study on the
competitiveness of the Brazilian industry, which entailed an
extensive mapping of the Brazilian industrial sector by nearly
one hundred specialists. He was executive secretary of the
Ministry of Science and Technology from 1985 to 1988, where he
participated in the restructuring of the ministry and in
policy-making with respect to complex areas such as
biotechnology, information technology, chemistry, mechanics and
new materials. Mr. Coutinho holds an undergraduate degree
in economics from the Universidade de São Paulo, where he
received the Gastão Vidigal award for best economics
student. He holds a masters degree in economics from the
Economic Research Institute of the Universidade de São
Paulo. Mr. Coutinho has been a visiting professor at the
Universidade de São Paulo, the University of Paris XIII,
the University of Texas and the Ortega y Gasset Institute.
Before assuming the presidency of BNDES, Mr. Coutinho was a
partner of LCA Consultores, where he provided expert advice on
antitrust, international trade and economics.
Eduardo Fernando Jardim Pinto. Mr. Jardim
Pinto joined our Board of Directors in April 2009. He also
served on our Board from 2005 to 2007. Since 1983 he has held
several positions at Vale, including specialized train
conductor. Currently, he is a coordinator of CUTVALE, and since
August 1997 he has been president of the railroad employees
union in the states of Pará, Maranhão and Tocantins.
He received a law degree from Faculdade São Luís.
Francisco Augusto da Costa e
Silva. Mr. Costa e Silva joined our Board of
Directors in April 2005. He is also a partner of Bocater,
Camargo, Costa e Silva Advogados Associados, a law firm in Rio
de Janeiro. Mr. Costa e Silva also serves as a director of
the Comitê de Ética de Associação dos
Analistas e Profissionais de Investimento do Mercado de
Capitais (APIMEC) of Banco de Brasil, and of the
development committee of Pontifícia Universidade
Católica in Rio de Janeiro. He started his career at BNDES,
where he held a variety of positions, including executive
officer. Previously, he served on the board of directors of
several companies and entities, namely Solpart
Participações S.A., Aracruz Celulose S.A., Pisa Papel
de Imprensa S.A., Fundação de Assistência e
Previdência Social do BNDES and the Rio de Janeiro
Stock Exchange. Mr. Costa e Silva also served as president
of the CVM and of the Council of Securities Regulators of the
Americas (COSRA) joined Comissão da Moeda e
do Crédito (COMOC) and the Supplemental
Pension Plan Council and served on the executive committee of
the International Organization of Securities Commissions
(IOSCO). Mr. Costa e Silva received his law
degree from the Universidade do Estado da Guanabara, currently
UERJ, and an MBA degree from the Universidade Federal do Rio de
Janeiro.
113
EXECUTIVE
OFFICERS
Overview
The executive officers are our legal representatives and are
responsible for
day-to-day
operations and the implementation of the general policies and
guidelines set forth by the Board of Directors. Our bylaws
provide for a minimum of six and a maximum of eleven executive
officers. The Board of Directors appoints executive officers for
two-year terms and may remove them at any time. Under Brazilian
corporate law, executive officers must be Brazilian residents.
The executive officers hold regularly scheduled meetings on a
weekly basis and hold additional meetings when called by any
executive officer.
Executive
officers
The following table lists our current executive officers. The
term of each of our executive officers expires in May 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
appointment
|
|
Position
|
|
Age
|
|
Roger Agnelli
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
49
|
|
Fabio de Oliveira Barbosa
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
48
|
|
José Carlos Martins
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Executive Officer (Ferrous Minerals)
|
|
|
59
|
|
Eduardo de Salles Bartolomeo
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Executive Officer (Logistics, Project Management and
Sustainability)
|
|
|
45
|
|
Carla Grasso
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
Executive Officer (Human Resources & Corporate Services)
|
|
|
47
|
|
Tito Botelho Martins
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Executive Officer (Non-ferrous Minerals)
|
|
|
46
|
|
We have summarized below the experience, areas of expertise, and
principal outside business interests of our current executive
officers.
Roger Agnelli. Mr. Agnelli was appointed
as our chief executive officer and president in July 2001. Prior
to his appointment, he was the chairman of our Board of
Directors from May 2000 until July 2001. Mr. Agnelli
developed his professional career at the Bradesco Financial
Group, one of the largest private financial institutions in
Brazil, from 1981 to 2001, where he served as executive director
of Banco Bradesco from 1998 until 2000. Given his experience in
the areas of investment, mergers & acquisitions and
asset management, he was director of UGB and vice-president of
Brazils National Association of Investment Banks
(ANBID). Mr. Agnelli was also president and
chief executive officer of Bradespar from March 2000 to July
2001 and a member of the board of directors of several major
companies in Brazil and abroad, such as Companhia Paulista de
Força e Luz, CSN, Latasa S.A., VBC Energia, Brasmotor,
Mahle Metal Leve, Rio Grande Energia, Suzano Petroquímica,
Serra da Mesa Energia, Duke Energy, Spectra Energy and
Petrobras. From 2003 until 2007, he was a member of the Economic
and Social Development Council (CDES), an advisory
body to the president of Brazil. He is presently a member of the
Private Sector Advisory Council (CONEX) of the
foreign trade chamber of the presidency of Brazil and a member
of the international advisory investment council to the
president of the Republic of Mozambique, Dr. Armando
Guebuza. He is vice-president of the center of industries of the
state of Rio de Janeiro, and a member of the strategic superior
council of the Federation of Industries of the State of São
Paulo (FIESP). He is also a member of the board of
directors of ABB Ltd, Anadarkos Global Advisory Board and
the international advisory committee of the NYSE.
Mr. Agnelli has a degree in economics from the
Fundação Armando Álvares Penteado in São
Paulo.
Carla Grasso. Ms. Grasso was appointed as
our executive officer for human resources and corporate services
in October 2001. She joined us in 1997 as chief of personnel,
management and information technology officer of our corporate
centre, a post she held until assuming her current position.
Prior to joining us, Ms. Grasso was chairperson of
Brazils Pension Fund Authority and head of the office
of international affairs of the Ministry of Social Welfare. She
was also head of the department of fiscal policies of the
Ministry of Finance and coordinator of the social and
macroeconomic areas in the office of the president of Brazil.
She is vice-president of Vale Incos executive board of
directors and member of Curators Council of
114
Fundação Vale. Ms. Grasso holds a degree in
economics from the Universidade de Brasília and a
masters degree in economic policies, and has attended
other executive education programs. For three years, she
lectured economics and advanced mathematics at the Centro
Universitário do Distrito Federal and at the Universidade
Católica de Brasília.
Eduardo de Salles
Bartolomeo. Mr. Bartolomeo was appointed as
our executive officer of logistics, engineering and projects
management in January 2007. From August to December 2006,
Mr. Bartolomeo was president of Petroflex. Between January
2004 and July 2006, he was an officer of our logistics
operations department. Mr. Bartolomeo began his career as a
trainee in 1988 at COSIPA, and a year later he became head of
the steel conversion sector, a position he held until 1991. His
next professional experience was at Americas Brewery Co.
(AMBEV), the worlds third largest brewery
company, where he worked from 1994 until 2003. At AMBEV, he held
several executive positions such as manager of corporate
planning, plant manager, corporate logistics manager and
regional director. Mr. Bartolomeo is a member of the boards
of directors of Log-in and MRS. Mr. Bartolomeo graduated in
metallurgical engineering from the Universidade Federal
Fluminense, and an MBA from the Katholieke University at Leuvin
in Belgium.
Fabio de Oliveira Barbosa. Mr. Barbosa
was appointed as our chief financial officer and investor
relations officer in May 2002, and he is also responsible for
the new business development area. From April 2000 to March
2002, Mr. Barbosa served as a member of our Board of
Directors. Prior to joining Vale, Mr. Barbosa has served as
Secretary of the National Treasury at the Ministry of Finance
from July 1999 until January 2002, after having held the
position of assistant secretary in previous years. From 1992 to
1995, he served as advisor to the executive board of directors
of the World Bank, in Washington, DC. From 1985 to 1990,
Mr. Barbosa held various relevant positions at different
public institutions, such as Institute for Applied Economic
Research (IPEA), the Ministry of Industry and
Commerce, the institute for development of the state of
Paraná, the Ministry of Labor, and the Ministry of Federal
Planning, where he worked as an economic advisor and head of the
unit for economic analysis. From 1990 to 1992, he was first a
deputy and then a head of the fiscal policy unit at the Ministry
of Finance. He has also been the chairman of the board of
directors of CAEMI, Banco do Estado de São Paulo S.A., and
member of the boards of Banco do Brasil, Caixa Econômica
Federal, Companhia Siderúrgica de Tubarão and
Telecomunicações de São Paulo
(TELESP). He is also a member of the Board of
Directors of BM&F Bovespa. Mr. Barbosa holds a degree
in economics from the Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais and
concluded a masters (all but dissertation) in economics
from the Universidade de Brasilia. He has attended several
executive educational programs at INSEAD (France), IMD
(Switzerland), Sloan School of Management, MIT (USA), and a
specialized course in financial programming and policy at the
International Monetary Fund.
José Carlos Martins. Mr. Martins was
appointed as our executive officer for ferrous minerals in April
2005. From April 2004 until March 2005, he was our executive
officer for new business development. With more than
40 years of solid experience in the metal industry, he
held, from 1986 until 1996, several important positions at
Aços Villares, including the position of officer and later
on chief executive officer. From 1997 to 1999, he was the
executive officer for steel production of CSN. In 1999, he
became president of Latasa, one of the largest producers of
aluminum beverage cans of Latin America. When Rexam UK bought
Latasa in 2003, he became the president of Rexam in South
America for the aluminum can production and marketing. He holds
a degree in economics from Pontifícia Universidade
Católica in São Paulo.
Tito Botelho Martins. Mr. Martins was
appointed Vale Incos president and chief executive officer
as of January 1, 2009, and continues to serve as our
executive officer for non-ferrous minerals. He oversees our
nickel, copper, aluminum and coal operations. He previously
served as the executive officer for corporate affairs and
energy. Prior to that, he served as the managing officer of the
corporate finance department from August 1999 to September 2003.
Previously, from 1985 to 1999, he held various positions in our
financial departments. Mr. Martins was also the chief
executive officer of CAEMI and chairman and chief executive
officer of MBR from 2003 to 2006. As a result of his expertise
in the fields of administration and finance, Mr. Martins
has been a member of the board of directors of several
corporations both in Brazil and abroad, including
Fundação Vale do Rio Doce de Seguridade Social
(Valia), FCA, Samarco Mineração S.A.,
FERROBAN Ferrovias Bandeirantes S.A., Aço Minas
Gerais S.A. (Açominas), Gulf Industrial
Investment Company (GIIC) in Bahrain, Itabrasco and
Hispanobras. He is the chairman of the boards of
115
directors of MRN, Alunorte and Albras. Mr. Martins holds a
degree in economics from the Universidade Federal de Minas
Gerais and a masters degree in management from the
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. He has attended
executive education programs at INSEAD, France, and at the
Kellogg School of Management of Northwestern University.
FISCAL
COUNCIL
Under Brazilian corporate law, corporations may have a fiscal
council, a corporate body whose members are elected by
shareholders and are independent of our management and external
auditors. The primary responsibility of the fiscal council under
Brazilian corporate law is to monitor managements
activities and review the financial statements, reporting its
findings to the shareholders. We have established a permanent
fiscal council, which may have from three to five members. In
addition, Vales bylaws have empowered our Fiscal Council
to take responsibility for additional matters as described below.
In compliance with the listed company audit committee rules of
the NYSE and the SEC, effective July 31, 2005, we have
designated and empowered our Fiscal Council to perform the role
of the audit committee in reliance on the exemption set forth in
Exchange Act
Rule 10A-3(c)(3).
This measure was undertaken pursuant to an amendment to our
bylaws approved by the shareholders on July 19, 2005.
Under our bylaws, our Fiscal Council is responsible for
establishing procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment
of any complaints related to accounting, controls and audit
issues, as well as procedures for the confidential, anonymous
submission of concerns regarding such matters; recommending and
assisting our Board of Directors in the appointment,
establishment of compensation and dismissal of the independent
auditors; pre-approving the services to be rendered by our
independent auditors; and overseeing the work performed by the
external auditors, with powers to suspend the payment of
compensation to the independent auditors and to resolve
disagreements between management and the auditors regarding
financial reporting.
The members of our Fiscal Council must meet applicable
eligibility requirements under Brazilian corporate law. A member
of our Fiscal Council cannot (i) hold office as a member of
the Board of Directors, fiscal council or advisory committee of
any company that competes with Vale or otherwise has conflicting
interests with Vale, unless compliance with this requirement is
expressly waived by a decision taken by the shareholders in a
shareholders meeting, (ii) be an employee or member
of the management of Vale or its subsidiaries and affiliates, or
(iii) be a spouse or relative within the third degree by
affinity or consanguinity of an officer or director of Vale.
On April 16, 2009, the shareholders elected the current
members of the Fiscal Council and their respective alternates.
The members of the Fiscal Council are elected for one-year
terms. Holders of preferred shares, including the golden shares,
may elect one member of the Fiscal Council and the respective
alternate. Minority holders of common shares comprising at least
10% of the common shares outstanding may also elect one member
of the Fiscal Council and the respective alternate. The terms of
the members of the Fiscal Council expire at the next annual
shareholders meeting following their election. The
following table lists the current members of the Fiscal Council.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First year of
appointment
|
|
|
Bernard Appy(1)
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Antônio José Figueiredo Ferreira(2)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Marcelo Amaral Moraes(2)
|
|
|
2004
|
|
Aníbal Moreira dos Santos(2)
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Appointed by the preferred
shareholders.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Appointed by Valepar.
|
116
The following table lists the alternate members of the Fiscal
Council.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First year of
appointment
|
|
|
Marcus Pereira Aucélio(1)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Cícero da Silva(2)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Oswaldo Mário Pêgo de Amorim Azevedo(2)
|
|
|
2004
|
|
Vacant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Appointed by the preferred
shareholders.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Appointed by Valepar.
|
We have summarized below the experience, areas of expertise, and
principal outside business interests of the current members of
our Fiscal Council.
Bernard Appy. Mr. Appy was elected as a
member of our Fiscal Council in April 2006. Since August 2008,
he has served as secretary for economic and fiscal reforms to
the Brazilian Ministry of Finance. From January 2003 to May 2005
and from March 2006 to April 2007, he was deputy minister at the
Brazilian Ministry of Finance. From May 2005 to March 2006 and
from April 2007 to August 2008, he held the position of
secretary for economic policies at the Ministry of Finance.
Mr. Appy is a member of faculty of the economics department
of Pontifícia Universidade Católica in São Paulo
since 1997. From 1995 to 2002, he was a partner of LCA
Consultores Ltda., a consulting firm in economics. Mr. Appy
received a graduate degree in economics from the Universidade de
São Paulo, and concluded a masters program in economics at
the Universidade Estadual de Campinas.
Antônio José de Figueiredo
Ferreira. Mr. Ferreira was appointed as a
member of our Fiscal Council in April 2008. From May 2005 until
April 2008, he was chairman of our accounting committee,
(previously known as the audit committee). Mr. Ferreira
worked for Banco do Brasil for 32 years, where he held
positions in the audit and information technology areas. From
1996 until May 2007, Mr. Ferreira served as internal audit
chief of Previ. Mr. Ferreira received a degree in
mechanical engineering from the Universidade do Estado do Rio de
Janeiro, and a law degree from the Universidade Federal do Rio
de Janeiro. He also concluded an MBA in internal auditing at the
Universidade de São Paulo and in finance and corporate law
at Fundação Getúlio Vargas in Rio de Janeiro.
Mr. Ferreira has also concluded an MBA in management and
private pension programs from the Wharton School of the
University of Pennsylvania.
Marcelo Amaral Moraes. Mr. Moraes has
served as a member of our Fiscal Council since 2004. He joined
Grupo Stratus in August 2006 as the officer responsible for
specialized funds area. Prior to that, Mr. Moraes worked at
Bradespar as an investment manager for six years. From 1995 to
2000, he worked in the mergers and acquisitions and capital
markets departments of Banco Bozano, Simonsen. In 2004, he was
an alternate member of the board of directors of Net
Serviços S.A., and in 2003, he was an alternate member of
our Board of Directors. Mr. Moraes has a graduate degree in
economics from the Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro and an
MBA from Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro/COPPEAD.
Aníbal Moreira dos
Santos. Mr. Santos has served as a member of
our Fiscal Council since 2005. He was an executive officer of
Caemi Canada Inc., Caemi Canada Investments Inc., CMM Overseas,
Ltd., Caemi International Holdings BV and Caemi International
Investments NV, subsidiaries of Caemi from 1998 to 2003, when he
retired. From 1983 to 2003, he was chief accounting officer of
CAEMI. From 1999 to 2003, he was a member of the fiscal council
of CADAM S.A., and from 1998 to 2003, he was an alternate member
of the board of directors of MBR and EBM. Mr. Santos has a
degree in accounting from Fundação Getúlio Vargas.
117
ADVISORY
COMMITTEES
Advisory
committees
Our bylaws establish the following technical and advisory
committees to the Board of Directors.
|
|
|
|
|
The Executive Development Committee is responsible for
reporting on general human resources policies, analyzing and
reporting on the adequacy of compensation levels for our
executive officers, proposing and updating guidelines for
evaluating the performance of our executive officers, and
reporting on policies relating to health and safety.
|
|
|
|
The Strategy Committee is responsible for reviewing and
making recommendations to the Board of Directors concerning: the
strategic guidelines and plan submitted annually to the board by
our executive officers, our annual and multi-annual investment
budgets, investment or divestiture opportunities submitted by
executive officers, and mergers and acquisitions.
|
|
|
|
The Finance Committee is responsible for reviewing and
making recommendations to the Board of Directors concerning: our
corporate risks and financial policies and the internal
financial control systems, compatibility between the level of
distributions to shareholders and the parameters established in
the annual budget, and the consistency between our general
dividend policy and capital structure.
|
|
|
|
The Accounting Committee is responsible for: nominating
an employee to be responsible for our internal auditing,
reporting on auditing policies and the execution of our annual
auditing plan, tracking the results of our internal auditing,
and identifying, prioritizing, and submitting recommendations to
the executive officers, and analyzing and making recommendations
with regard to our annual report and financial statements.
|
|
|
|
The Governance and Sustainability Committee is
responsible for: evaluating and recommending improvements to the
effectiveness of our corporate governance practices and the
functioning of our Board of Directors, recommending improvements
to the code of ethical conduct and our management system in
order to avoid conflicts of interests between Vale and its
shareholders or management, issuing reports on potential
conflicts of interest between Vale and its shareholders or
management, and reporting on policies relating to corporate
responsibility, such as environmental and social responsibility.
|
COMPENSATION
OF DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AND MEMBERS OF THE FISCAL
COUNCIL AND ADVISORY COMMITTEES
General
Under our bylaws, our shareholders are responsible for
establishing the aggregate compensation we pay to the members of
our Board of Directors and our executive officers. Our
shareholders determine this annual aggregate compensation at the
general shareholders meeting each year. In order to
establish aggregate director and officer compensation, our
shareholders usually take into account various factors, which
range from attributes, experience and skills of our directors
and executive officers to the recent performance of our
operations. Once aggregate compensation is established, the
members of our Board of Directors are then responsible for
distributing such aggregate compensation in compliance with our
bylaws among the directors and executive officers, in the latter
case, at the recommendation of the Chief Executive Officer. The
Executive Development Committee of our Board of Directors makes
recommendations to the board concerning the annual aggregate
compensation of the executive officers. In addition to fixed
compensation, our executive officers are also eligible for
bonuses and incentive payments.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, we paid
US$33 million in aggregate to the executive officers, of
which US$9 million was fixed compensation and
US$24 million was variable compensation and benefits in
kind granted, and US$0.9 million in aggregate to the
members of our Board of Directors for services in all
118
capacities, all of which was fixed compensation. The amounts
accrued to provide pension, retirement or similar benefits for
our executive officers was US$0.8 million. There are no
similar benefits for the members of our Board of Directors.
As of March 31, 2009, the total number of common shares
owned by our directors and executive officers was 158,535, and
the total number of preferred shares owned by our directors and
executive officers was 1,051,416. None of our directors or
executive officers beneficially owns 1% or more of any class of
our shares.
Fiscal
Council
We paid an aggregate of US$475,400 to members of the Fiscal
Council in 2008. In addition, the members of the Fiscal Council
are reimbursed for travel expenses related to the performance of
their functions.
Advisory
committees
We paid an aggregate of US$148,900 to members of our advisory
committees in 2008. Under article 15 of our bylaws, those
members who are directors or officers of Vale are not entitled
to additional compensation for participating on a committee.
Members of our advisory committees are reimbursed for travel
expenses related to the performance of their functions.
EMPLOYEES
General
The following table sets forth the number of our employees by
category as of the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Ferrous minerals
|
|
|
21,143
|
|
|
|
21,700
|
|
|
|
23,859
|
|
Logistics
|
|
|
10,661
|
|
|
|
11,679
|
|
|
|
13,049
|
|
Non-ferrous minerals
|
|
|
18,126
|
|
|
|
20,955
|
|
|
|
22,902
|
|
Administrative
|
|
|
2,716
|
|
|
|
2,709
|
|
|
|
2,680
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total(1)
|
|
|
52,646
|
|
|
|
57,043
|
|
|
|
62,490
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The increase in the number of
employees is mainly due to organic growth and the strategic
decision to move in-house certain previously outsourced services.
|
Labor
relations
We negotiate wages and benefits with a large number of unions
worldwide that represent our employees. We have experienced
strikes and work stoppages at our Voiseys Bay operations
as recently as September 2006, at our Sudbury operations as
recently as April 2007 and at our Indonesian operations as
recently as November 2007. We have collective agreements with
unionized employees at our Australian, Brazilian, Canadian,
Indonesian, New Caledonian and U.K. operations.
Wages and
benefits
Wages and benefits for Vale and its subsidiaries are generally
established on a
company-by-company
basis. Vale establishes its wage and benefits programs for Vale
and its subsidiaries other than Vale Inco in periodic
negotiations with its unions. In November 2007, Vale reached a
two-year agreement with the Brazilian unions, which is valid
until November 2009. A salary increase of 7% was implemented in
November 2008 for our employees in Brazil as part of a two-year
agreement reached in 2007. The provisions of Vales
collective bargaining agreements with its unions also apply to
Vales non-unionized employees. Vale Inco establishes wages
and benefits for unionized employees through collective
agreements. For non-unionized employees, Vale Inco establishes
its annual wage program in January of each year for all
locations other than
119
the U.K., which establishes its annual wage program in August.
Vale and its subsidiaries provide their employees and their
dependents with other benefits, including supplementary medical
assistance.
Pension
plans
Brazilian employees of Vale and of most of its Brazilian
subsidiaries are eligible to participate in pension plans
managed by Fundação Vale do Rio Doce de Seguridade
Social (Valia). Sponsored by Vale and such
subsidiaries, Valia is a closed, nonprofit, complementary social
security foundation with financial and administrative autonomy.
Most of the participants in plans held by Valia are participants
in a plan named Vale Mais, which Valia implemented
in May 2000. This plan is primarily a defined contribution plan
with a defined benefit feature relating to service prior to May
2000 and another defined benefit feature relating to the risk
coverage events such as temporary or permanent disability and
death. Valia also holds the old plan which is a
defined benefit plan, with benefits based on years of service,
salary and social security benefits. This plan covers retired
participants and their beneficiaries, as well as a relatively
small number of employees that declined to transfer from the old
plan to the Vale Mais plan when it was established
in May 2000. Employees of Albras and Alunorte participate in
different pension plans maintained by Bradesco Vida e
Previdência S.A.
Vale Inco sponsors defined benefit pension plans principally in
Canada, the United States, the United Kingdom and Indonesia.
Each of the jurisdictions in which these plans is offered has
legislation which, among other statutory requirements, cover
minimum contributions to be made to these plans to meet their
potential liabilities as calculated in accordance with such
legislation. Effective January 1, 2009 the defined benefit
plan for non-unionized staff employees in Canada was closed to
new participants and effective February 1, 2009 the defined
benefit plan in Indonesia was closed to new participants. A
defined contribution plan will be introduced for new employees
effective July 1, 2009, and existing employees will have
the opportunity to elect to move from the defined benefit to the
defined contribution plan effective January 1, 2010. Vale
Incos subsidiary, Vale Inco Newfoundland and Labrador
Limited, has a defined contribution pension plan. In addition,
Vale Inco provides supplemental retirement benefits arrangements
for eligible employees.
Performance-based
compensation
All Vale parent-company employees receive incentive compensation
each year in an amount based on the performance of Vale, the
performance of the employees department and the
performance of the individual employee. Similar incentive
compensation arrangements are in place at our subsidiaries.
Certain Vale employees also receive deferred bonuses with
vesting periods of three years based on Vales performance
as measured by total shareholder return relative to a group of
peer companies over the vesting period. Since 2008, qualifying
management personnel are eligible to participate in a bonus
program tied to share ownership. Under the program, an employee
may elect to invest part of his bonus in Vale shares. If the
employee continues to be employed by us and to hold all the
shares, after three years the employee will receive an
additional bonus payment sufficient to purchase for his account,
in the open market, a number of additional shares equal to the
number of shares the employee purchased under the program. In
2008, 883 employees elected to participate in the program,
and in 2009 1,144 employees elected to participate in the
program.
120
|
|
Item 7.
|
Major
shareholders and related party transactions
|
MAJOR
SHAREHOLDERS
Overview
Major Vale Shareholders. The following table
sets forth certain information regarding beneficial ownership of
our common and preferred shares as of March 31, 2009, by
each person we know to be the beneficial owner of more than 5%
of any class of our outstanding capital stock, and by all
directors and executive officers as a group.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares owned
|
|
|
% of class
|
|
|
Common shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valepar(1)
|
|
|
1,716,435,045
|
|
|
|
52.7%
|
|
BNDESPAR(2)
|
|
|
218,386,481
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
Directors and executive officers as a group
|
|
|
158,535
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Preferred shares(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directors and executive officers as a group
|
|
|
1,051,416
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Golden shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brazilian government
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
See the following table for more
information on Valepars shareholders. Because each of the
shareholders of Valepar has the right to veto the transfer by
Valepar of any shares it holds in Vale, each of the Valepar
shareholders may be deemed a beneficial owner of the entire
Valepar stake under the rules of the SEC. In general, a person
who has or shares voting power or investment power with respect
to securities is treated as a beneficial owner of those
securities. This does not imply that the person has the economic
or other benefits of ownership.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Excludes common shares owned
directly by Valepar, in which BNDESPAR has an ownership interest.
|
|
(3)
|
|
The Brazilian government (National
Treasury) owns, through Fundo Garantidor das Parcerias
Público-Privadas, 60,904,092 preferred shares, representing
2.9% of the outstanding preferred shares, and BNDESPAR owns
8,528,679 preferred shares, representing 0.4% of the outstanding
preferred shares.
|
|
(*)
|
|
Represents less than 1% of the
outstanding shares of the class.
|
Valepar shareholders. The tables below set
forth information as of March 31, 2009 regarding share
ownership of the common shares of Valepar and of its shareholder
Litel Participações S.A.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Valepar
|
|
|
Percent of Valepar
|
|
|
|
common shares owned
|
|
|
common shares owned
|
|
|
Valepar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Litel Participações S.A.(1)
|
|
|
637,443,857
|
|
|
|
49.00%
|
|
Eletron S.A.(2)
|
|
|
380,708
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
Bradespar S.A.(3)
|
|
|
275,965,821
|
|
|
|
21.21
|
|
Mitsui & Co. Ltd.(4)
|
|
|
237,328,059
|
|
|
|
18.24
|
|
BNDESPAR(5)
|
|
|
149,787,385
|
|
|
|
11.51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,300,905,830
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Litel owns 200,864,272 preferred
class A shares of Valepar, which represents 71.41% of the
preferred class A shares. Litela, an affiliate of Litel,
owns 80,416,931 preferred class A shares of Valepar, which
represents 28.59% of the preferred class A shares. LitelB,
also an affiliate of Litel, owns 25,862,068 preferred
class C shares of Valepar, which represents 29.25% of the
preferred class C shares.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Elétron owns 32,729 preferred
class C shares of Valepar, which represents 0.04% of the
preferred class C shares.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Bradespar is controlled by a
control group consisting of Cidade de DeusCia. Comercial
Participações, Fundação Bradesco, NCF
Participações S.A. and Nova Cidade de Deus
Participações S.A. Bradespar owns 23,724,193 preferred
class C shares of Valepar, which represents 26.83% of the
preferred class C shares.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Mitsui owns 20,402,587 preferred
class C shares of Valepar, which represents 23.08% of the
preferred class C shares.
|
|
(5)
|
|
BNDESPAR owns 18,394,143 preferred
class C shares of Valepar, which represents 20.80% of the
preferred class C shares.
|
121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Litel
|
|
|
Percent of Litel
|
|
|
|
common shares owned
|
|
|
common shares owned
|
|
|
Litel Participações S.A.(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BB Carteira Ativa
|
|
|
193,740,121
|
|
|
|
78.40%
|
|
Carteira Ativa II
|
|
|
53,387,982
|
|
|
|
21.60%
|
|
Previ
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
0%
|
|
Others
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
|
−
|
|
Directors and executive officers as a group
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
−
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
247,128,345
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Each of BB Carteira Ativa and
Carteira Ativa II is a Brazilian investment fund. BB
Carteira Ativa is 100% owned by Previ. Carteira Ativa II is
59.36% owned by Funcef, 35.81% owned by Petros and 4.84% owned
by Fundação Cesp. Each of Previ, Petros, Funcef and
Fundação Cesp is a Brazilian pension fund.
|
Brazilian government holdings. In 1997, we
were privatized by the Brazilian government, which sold its
controlling interest to Valepar. The National Treasury and
BNDES, the state-owned development bank, subsequently sold
additional shares in 2002. Currently, BNDESPAR, a wholly-owned
subsidiary of BNDES, owns common shares representing 6.7% of our
outstanding common shares and 0.4% of our outstanding preferred
shares. The Brazilian government now owns 2.9% of our
outstanding preferred shares (not counting shares held by
BNDESPAR), and 12 golden shares of Vale, which give it veto
powers over certain actions that we could propose to take, such
as changes to our name, the location of our headquarters and our
corporate purpose as it relates to mining activities. For a
detailed description of the veto powers granted to the Brazilian
government by virtue of its ownership of the golden shares, see
Item 10. Additional informationCommon shares and
preferred sharesGeneral.
Controlling
shareholder
Valepar S.A. is our controlling shareholder. The shareholders of
Valepar are parties to a shareholders agreement, ending in
2017. This agreement:
|
|
|
|
|
grants rights of first refusal on any transfer of Valepar shares
and preemptive rights on any new issue of Valepar shares;
|
|
|
|
prohibits the direct acquisition of Vale shares by
Valepars shareholders unless authorized by the other
shareholders party to the agreement;
|
|
|
|
prohibits encumbrances on Valepar shares (other than in
connection with financing an acquisition of Vale shares);
|
|
|
|
requires each party generally to retain control of its special
purpose company holding its interest in shares of Valepar,
unless the rights of first refusal mentioned above are observed;
|
|
|
|
allocates seats on Valepars and Vales boards among
representatives of the parties;
|
|
|
|
commits the Valepar shareholders to support a Vale dividend
policy of distributing 50% of Vales net profit for each
fiscal year, unless the Valepar shareholders commit to support a
different dividend policy for a given year;
|
|
|
|
provides for the maintenance by Vale of a capital structure that
does not exceed specified debt to equity thresholds;
|
|
|
|
requires the Valepar shareholders to vote their indirectly held
Vale shares and to cause their representatives on Vales
Board of Directors to vote only in accordance with decisions
made at Valepar meetings held prior to meetings of Vales
Board of Directors or shareholders; and
|
|
|
|
establishes supermajority voting requirements for certain
significant actions relating to Valepar and to Vale.
|
122
Pursuant to the Valepar shareholders agreement, Valepar
cannot support any of the following actions with respect to Vale
without the consent of at least 75% of the holders of
Valepars common shares:
|
|
|
|
|
any amendment of Vales bylaws;
|
|
|
|
any increase of Vales capital stock by share subscription,
creation of a new class of shares, change in the characteristics
of the existing shares or any reduction of Vales capital
stock;
|
|
|
|
any issuance of any debentures of Vale, whether convertible into
shares of Vale, participation certificates upon compensation,
call options or any other security of Vale;
|
|
|
|
any determination of issuance price for any new shares of
capital stock or other security of Vale;
|
|
|
|
any amalgamation, spin-off or merger to which Vale is a party,
as well as any change to Vales corporate form;
|
|
|
|
any dissolution, receivership, bankruptcy or any other voluntary
act for financial reorganization or any suspension thereof;
|
|
|
|
the election and replacement of Vales Board of Directors,
including the chairman of the board, and any executive officer
of Vale;
|
|
|
|
the disposal or acquisition by Vale of equity interest in any
company, as well as the acquisition of any shares of capital
stock of Vale or Valepar;
|
|
|
|
the participation by Vale in a group of companies or in a
consortium of any kind;
|
|
|
|
the execution by Vale of agreements relating to distribution,
investment, sales exportation, technology transfer, trademark
license, patent exploration, license to use and leases;
|
|
|
|
the approval and amendment of Vales business plan;
|
|
|
|
the determination of the compensation of the executive officers
and directors of Vale, as well as the duties of the Board of
Directors and the Board of Executive Officers;
|
|
|
|
any profit sharing among the administrators of Vale;
|
|
|
|
any change in the corporate purpose of Vale;
|
|
|
|
the distribution or non-distribution of any dividends (including
distributions classified as interest on shareholders
equity) on any shares of capital stock of Vale other than as
provided in Vales bylaws;
|
|
|
|
the appointment and replacement of Vales independent
auditor;
|
|
|
|
the creation of any in rem guarantee, granting of
guarantees including rendering of sureties by Vale with respect
to obligations of any unrelated party, including any affiliates
or subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
the passing of any resolution on any matter which, pursuant to
applicable law, entitles a shareholder to withdrawal rights;
|
|
|
|
the appointment and replacement by the Board of Directors of any
representative of Vale in subsidiaries, companies related to
Vale or other companies in which Vale is entitled to appoint
directors and officers; and
|
|
|
|
any change in the debt to equity threshold, as defined in the
shareholders agreement.
|
In addition, the shareholders agreement provides that any
issuance of participation certificates by Vale and any
disposition by Valepar of Vale shares requires the unanimous
consent of all of Valepars shareholders.
American
Depositary Shares
As of March 31, 2009, our ADSs represented 23.0% of our
outstanding common shares and 37.7% of our outstanding preferred
shares.
123
RELATED
PARTY TRANSACTIONS
We have arms-length commercial relationships in the
ordinary course of our business with Mitsui, a shareholder of
Valepar (our controlling shareholder), and with a number of
companies that are affiliated with shareholders of Valepar, such
as Cemig and Usiminas (in each of which Previ holds an
interest). We also have arms-length commercial
relationships in the ordinary course of our business with
subsidiaries of companies on whose boards our CEO currently
serves or has served as a director, such as Asea Brown Boveri
and Petrobras.
BNDES is the parent company of one of our major shareholders,
BNDESPAR. We and BNDES, the Brazilian state-owned development
bank, are parties to a contract relating to authorizations for
mining exploration. This contract, which we refer to as the
Mineral Risk Contract, provides for the joint development of
certain unexplored mineral deposits that form part of our
Northern System (Carajás), as well as proportional
participation in any profits earned from the development of such
resources. Iron ore and manganese ore deposits already
identified at the time we entered into the Mineral Risk Contract
(in March 1997) were specifically excluded from the
contract. In 2007, the Mineral Risk Contract was extended
indefinitely, with specific rules for all exploration projects
and exploration targets and mineral rights covered under the
contract. In addition, BNDES has participated in certain of our
financing arrangements. For more information on our transactions
with BNDES, see Item 5. Liquidity and capital
resourcesSources of funds.
For information regarding investments in affiliated companies
and joint ventures and for information regarding transactions
with major related parties, see Notes 12 and 24 to our
consolidated financial statements.
|
|
Item 8.
|
Financial
information
|
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
We and our subsidiaries are defendants in numerous legal actions
in the normal course of business, including civil,
administrative, tax, social security and labor proceedings. See
Note 20 to our consolidated financial statements.
CADE
proceedings
The primary Brazilian antitrust regulator, Conselho
Administrativo de Defesa Econômica, or CADE, conducts
post-transaction reviews of nearly all of our acquisitions and
joint ventures. In August 2005, CADE issued a decision in
connection with its post-transaction review of our acquisitions
of Mineração Socoimex S.A., Mineração
Trindade-Samitri, Ferteco Mineração S.A.,
Belém-Administrações e Participações
Ltda. and CAEMI Mineração e Metalurgia S.A., as well
as the unwinding of our former cross-shareholdings with
Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional (CSN). CADE
approved these transactions subject to the condition that we
either: (i) fully waive our preemptive rights relating to
the Casa de Pedra iron ore mine and restructure our stake in MRS
or (ii) sell all of our assets previously owned by Ferteco
Mineração S.A., a company we acquired in 2001 and
consolidated in August 2003. Pursuant to the conditions imposed
by CADE on its approval of these transactions, we decided to
waive our preemptive rights relating to the Casa de Pedra iron
ore mine, and we restructured our stake in MRS. In April 2009,
we signed an agreement with CSN pursuant to which we suspended
for a period of 30 days our action against it to recover
the value of the Casa de Pedra preemptive rights. The agreement
provides that if during this period CSN and certain direct and
indirect shareholders of Valepar (Previ, Litel and Bradespar),
which agreed in 2000 to unwind their cross-shareholdings with
CSN, execute an agreement that settles pending issues relating
to the unwinding, then (i) we will formerly terminate our
action against CSN, and (ii) CSN will grant us an option to
suspend or terminate a 2005 contract pursuant to which CSN
supplies us with iron ore from Casa de Pedra. If CSN and Previ,
Litel and Bradespar do not execute an agreement, then CSN may
elect during an additional
30-day
period to continue the agreement in effect with us. In January
2008, CADE fined us R$41 million (US$17.5 million) for
631 days of non-compliance with its decision, even though a
valid injunction was in effect during that period. We filed an
action with the federal circuit court to annul the penalty,
which is pending.
124
In two other proceedings, CADE is alleging that we have engaged
in illegal anticompetitive conduct in connection with our
logistics business. If CADE were to find that we have engaged in
anticompetitive conduct, it could order us to cease the conduct
and/or to
pay fines.
Privatization-related
suits
Numerous lawsuits challenging the legality of the minimum
auction price fixed in our 1997 privatization are pending,
including a number of class action lawsuits. The lower courts
issued favorable decisions in these lawsuits, which were
appealed by the respective plaintiffs. Certain cases were
resolved in our favor by the higher courts. In the remaining
cases, in which the plaintiffs have challenged the price paid
for the controlling block of Vale and other aspects of the
privatization, the higher courts overruled (in 2005) the
lower courts and ordered that the proceedings be re-submitted to
the lower courts to continue with discovery on the issue of the
basis for establishing the minimum price in the privatization
program. We have jointly appealed these decisions to the
Brazilian Supreme Court (STJ). We do not believe
that, individually or in the aggregate, these actions will
adversely affect the outcome of the privatization process or
otherwise have a material adverse effect on us.
Praia
Mole suit
We were a defendant in a public civil action seeking to annul
the concession agreement through which we and certain other
defendants operate the Praia Mole maritime terminal in the
Brazilian state of Espírito Santo. This case was decided in
our favor in November 2007, but the plaintiff filed an appeal
with the federal circuit court in April 2008, which is still
pending.
Itabira
suits
We are a defendant in two separate actions brought by the
municipality of Itabira, in the Brazilian state of Minas Gerais.
In one of the actions, filed in August 1996, the municipality of
Itabira alleges that our Itabira iron ore mining operations have
caused environmental and social damages and claims damages with
respect to the degradation of the site of one of our mines, as
well as the immediate restoration of the affected ecological
complex and the performance of compensatory environmental
programs in the region. The damages sought, as adjusted from the
date of the claim, amount to approximately R$2.029 billion
(US$868 million). In the other action, the municipality of
Itabira is claiming the right to be reimbursed for expenses it
has incurred in connection with public services rendered as a
consequence of our mining activities. The damages sought, as
adjusted from the date of the claim, amount to approximately
R$2.350 billion (US$1.006 billion). We believe these
suits are without merit.
CFEM-related
proceedings
We are currently a defendant in a series of administrative and
judicial proceedings brought by the National Mineral Production
Department (Departamento Nacional de Produção
Mineral), or DNPM, an agency of the Ministry of Mines and Energy
of the Brazilian government. The most significant of these
proceedings was brought against us in March 2006, alleging that
we have failed to pay the full amount of a mining royalty, known
as the CFEM, on revenues generated by our iron ore and manganese
activities. (For details about the CFEM, see Item 4.
Information on the companyRegulatory mattersMining
regulation.) We believe that the DNPMs allegations are
without merit. The aggregate amount claimed in the
administrative and judicial proceedings is approximately
R$3.9 billion (US$1.7 billion).
We are a defendant in a judicial proceeding brought in 2002 by
the Municipality of Mariana, alleging that we owe CFEM on our
pelletization activities. We do not believe pelletization
activities are subject to CFEM.
We are also involved in litigation with the DNPM regarding the
applicable CFEM rate for potash. Brazilian legislation
establishes a 2% rate for fertilizers. As the potash
commercialized by Vale is used as fertilizer, we believe the
applicable rate is 2%. The DNPM believes that the end-use of
potash is irrelevant for purposes of determining the applicable
rate and that the rate applicable to our potash products is 3%.
For more information about the CFEM, see Item 4.
Information on the companyRegulatory mattersMining
regulation.
125
Tax
litigation
As previously disclosed in the 2007 20-F, we are engaged in
litigation with respect to Article 74 of the Brazilian
Provisional Measure 2,158-34/2001, a tax regulation requiring
payment of income tax in Brazil on net income from foreign
subsidiaries. In 2003, we initiated a legal proceeding
challenging the applicability of this regulation to us, on the
basis of the following arguments: (i) Article 74 of
the Provisional Measure is inconsistent with double taxation
treaties between Brazil and the countries where certain of our
subsidiaries are based; (ii) the Brazilian Tax Code
prohibits the establishment of conditions on and timing of any
tax assessment by means of a regulation such as Article 74
of the Provisional Measure; (iii) even if Article 74
of the Provisional Measure is valid, exchange gain and loss must
be excluded from the net income of our foreign subsidiaries in
the calculation of taxes owed (in accordance with new Brazilian
accounting principles and IFRS; and (iv) the constitutional
principle prohibiting retroactive application of tax laws would
be violated if this regulation were applied to net income
generated before December 2001. We did not obtain a favorable
decision on the merits of the case, but we did obtain an
injunction suspending our obligation to pay the disputed
amounts. We appealed from the lower court decision in July 2005,
and the injunction remains in effect pending the resolution of
this appeal. The appeals courts decision on the merits is
suspended until final resolution of a parallel lawsuit filed by
the Brazilian Industry Association challenging the
constitutionality of Article 74 of the Provisional Measure.
Meanwhile, the tax authorities filed two administrative
proceedings claiming payment of R$10.997 billion
(US$4.706 billion) from us, of which R$5.928 billion
(US$2.536 billion) represents fines and interest for
non-payment of taxes and the remainder of which represents
unpaid income tax on the net income of our foreign subsidiaries.
We have filed our answer to these proceedings. We believe the
suits are without merit and are vigorously contesting them. In
accordance with our criteria for establishing provisions, we
have not made any provisions for these claims.
Valesul
litigation
In accordance with a resolution of ANEEL, the Brazilian
electricity regulatory agency, the electricity company of the
state of Rio de Janeiro (LIGHTServiços de
Eletricidade S.A.) was authorized to charge certain larger
consumers in Rio de Janeiro, including our aluminum subsidiary
Valesul, several additional fees as part of the tariff for the
use of the distribution system. Valesul began a challenge to the
legality of this charge in January 2004 and obtained a favorable
decision in June of that year. On appeal, this decision was
overruled, in September 2004, and Valesul was required to resume
making payments. The appeal to the STJ was unfavorable to
Valesul.
Gold
forward contracts
In 1988 and 1989, we entered into gold forward contracts with
various Brazilian private pension funds. Under the terms of
these contracts, settlement was permitted by either physical
delivery or cash payment. In 1990, however, the Brazilian
government passed a law prohibiting settlement by delivery, and
the funds were consequently prohibited from settling other than
in cash. During these years, Brazil experienced severe
inflation, and beginning in 2005, some of the pension funds sued
Vale, claiming that the inflation adjustment provided for in the
contracts did not adequately compensate them for monetary losses
arising from the governments measures to control inflation
during this period. There are 11 such suits pending final court
decisions.
126
DISTRIBUTIONS
Under our dividend policy, our Board of Executive Officers
proposes to our Board of Directors, no later than January 31 of
each year, a minimum value, expressed in U.S. dollars, that
will be distributed in that year to our shareholders.
Distributions may be classified for tax purposes either as
dividends or interest on shareholders equity, and
references to dividends should be understood to
include all distributions regardless of their tax
classification, unless stated otherwise. We determine the
minimum dividend payment in U.S. dollars, considering our
expected free cash flow generation in the year of distribution.
The proposal establishes two installments to be paid in the
months of April and October of each year. Each installment is
submitted to the Board of Directors at meetings in April and
October. Once approved, dividends are converted into and paid in
reais at prevailing exchange rates on the last business
day before the board meetings in April and October of each year.
The Board of Executive Officers can also propose to the Board of
Directors, depending on the evolution of our cash flow
performance, an additional payment to shareholders of an amount
over and above the minimum dividend initially established.
For 2009, our Executive Officers Board, has proposed a minimum
dividend of US$2.5 billion. Historically, we have paid the
same amount on both common and preferred shares in accordance
with our bylaws. The first installment of this dividend of
US$1.250 billion is expected to be paid on April 30,
2009.
Under Brazilian law and our bylaws, we are required to
distribute to our shareholders an annual amount equal to not
less than 25% of the distributable amount, referred to as the
mandatory dividend, unless the Board of Directors advises our
shareholders at our shareholders meeting that payment of
the mandatory dividend for the preceding year is inadvisable in
light of our financial condition. For a discussion of dividend
distribution provisions under Brazilian corporate law and our
bylaws, see Item 10. Additional information.
Distributions classified for tax purposes as dividends which are
paid to ADR holders and to non-resident shareholders will not be
subject to Brazilian withholding tax, unless the distribution is
paid from profits generated prior to December 31, 1995.
These distributions will be subject to Brazilian withholding tax
at varying rates. Distributions classified for tax purposes as
interest on shareholders equity which are paid to ADR
holders and to non-resident shareholders are currently subject
to Brazilian withholding tax. See Item 10. Additional
informationTaxationBrazilian tax considerations.
By law, we are required to hold an annual shareholders
meeting by April 30 of each year at which an annual dividend may
be declared. Additionally, our Board of Directors may declare
interim dividends. Under Brazilian corporate law, dividends are
generally required to be paid to the holder of record on a
dividend declaration date within 60 days following the date
the dividend was declared, unless a shareholders
resolution sets forth another date of payment, which, in either
case, must occur prior to the end of the fiscal year in which
the dividend was declared. A shareholder has a three-year period
from the dividend payment date to claim dividends (or payments
of interest on shareholders equity) in respect of its
shares, after which we will have no liability for such payments.
From 1997 to 2003, all distributions took the form of interest
on shareholders equity. In each year since 2004, part of
the distribution was made in the form of interest on
shareholders equity and part as dividends. See
Item 10. Additional informationCommon shares and
preferred sharesPayments on shareholders equity.
We make cash distributions on the common shares and preferred
shares underlying the ADSs in reais to the custodian on
behalf of the depositary. The custodian then converts such
proceeds into U.S. dollars and transfers such
U.S. dollars to be delivered to the depositary for
distribution to holders of American Depositary Receipts. The
depositary charges a fee of up to US$0.02 per ADS for each
distribution. For more information on Brazilian tax policies
regarding dividend distributions, see Item 10.
Additional informationTaxationBrazilian tax
considerations.
127
The following table sets forth the cash distributions we paid to
holders of common shares and preferred shares for the periods
indicated. Amounts have been restated to give effect to forward
stock splits that we have carried out in subsequent periods. We
have calculated U.S. dollar conversions using the
commercial selling rate in effect on the date of payment.
Amounts are stated before any applicable withholding tax.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reais per share at
|
|
|
U.S. dollars per share at
|
|
Year
|
|
Payment date
|
|
payment date
|
|
|
payment date
|
|
|
2002
|
|
April 30
|
|
|
0.19
|
|
|
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
December 10
|
|
|
0.22
|
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
2003
|
|
April 30
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
0.05
|
|
|
|
October 31
|
|
|
0.29
|
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
2004
|
|
April 30
|
|
|
0.17
|
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
October 29(1)
|
|
|
0.32
|
|
|
|
0.11
|
|
2005
|
|
April 29
|
|
|
0.28
|
|
|
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
October 31(2)
|
|
|
0.39
|
|
|
|
0.18
|
|
2006
|
|
April 28(3)
|
|
|
0.29
|
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
October 31(4)
|
|
|
0.29
|
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
2007
|
|
April 30(5)
|
|
|
0.35
|
|
|
|
0.17
|
|
|
|
October 31(6)
|
|
|
0.39
|
|
|
|
0.22
|
|
2008
|
|
April 30(7)
|
|
|
0.44
|
|
|
|
0.26
|
|
|
|
October 31(8)
|
|
|
0.65
|
|
|
|
0.30
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
R$0.26 per share classified for tax
purposes as interest on shareholders equity and R$0.06 per
share classified as dividends.
|
|
(2)
|
|
R$0.17 per share classified for tax
purposes as interest on shareholders equity and R$0.22 per
share classified as dividends.
|
|
(3)
|
|
R$0.17 per share classified for tax
purposes as interest on shareholders equity and R$0.12 per
share classified as dividends.
|
|
(4)
|
|
R$0.28 per share classified for tax
purposes as interest on shareholders equity and R$0.01 per
share classified as dividends.
|
|
(5)
|
|
R$0.13 per share classified for tax
purposes interest on shareholders equity and R$0.22 per
share classified as dividends.
|
|
(6)
|
|
R$0.38 per share classified as
interest on shareholders equity and R$0.01 per share
classified as dividends.
|
|
(7)
|
|
R$0.24 per share classified as
interest on shareholders equity and R$0.20 per share
classified as dividends.
|
|
(8)
|
|
R$0.51 per share classified as
interest on shareholders equity and R$0.14 per share
classified as dividends.
|
128
|
|
Item 9.
|
The
offer and listing
|
SHARE
PRICE HISTORY
The following table sets forth trading information for our ADSs,
as reported by the New York Stock Exchange and our shares, as
reported by the BOVESPA, for the periods indicated. Share prices
in the table have been adjusted to reflect stock splits.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$ per common
|
|
|
|
Reais per common share
|
|
|
Reais per preferred share
|
|
|
US$ per preferred ADS
|
|
|
ADS
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
14.24
|
|
|
|
6.74
|
|
|
|
12.34
|
|
|
|
6.46
|
|
|
|
4.33
|
|
|
|
2.03
|
|
|
|
4.97
|
|
|
|
2.15
|
|
2004
|
|
|
19.38
|
|
|
|
10.84
|
|
|
|
16.05
|
|
|
|
9.42
|
|
|
|
6.10
|
|
|
|
3.03
|
|
|
|
7.26
|
|
|
|
3.52
|
|
2005
|
|
|
24.98
|
|
|
|
16.00
|
|
|
|
21.75
|
|
|
|
13.75
|
|
|
|
9.89
|
|
|
|
5.49
|
|
|
|
11.27
|
|
|
|
6.40
|
|
2006
|
|
|
32.50
|
|
|
|
21.86
|
|
|
|
27.50
|
|
|
|
18.55
|
|
|
|
13.13
|
|
|
|
8.05
|
|
|
|
15.17
|
|
|
|
9.88
|
|
2007
|
|
|
65.90
|
|
|
|
29.40
|
|
|
|
55.62
|
|
|
|
25.42
|
|
|
|
31.59
|
|
|
|
11.83
|
|
|
|
37.75
|
|
|
|
13.76
|
|
1Q
|
|
|
38.58
|
|
|
|
29.40
|
|
|
|
32.95
|
|
|
|
25.42
|
|
|
|
15.91
|
|
|
|
11.83
|
|
|
|
18.80
|
|
|
|
13.76
|
|
2Q
|
|
|
45.35
|
|
|
|
38.10
|
|
|
|
37.95
|
|
|
|
32.08
|
|
|
|
19.98
|
|
|
|
15.78
|
|
|
|
23.78
|
|
|
|
18.69
|
|
3Q
|
|
|
63.00
|
|
|
|
40.01
|
|
|
|
52.87
|
|
|
|
33.67
|
|
|
|
28.58
|
|
|
|
15.73
|
|
|
|
33.98
|
|
|
|
19.11
|
|
4Q
|
|
|
65.90
|
|
|
|
56.60
|
|
|
|
55.62
|
|
|
|
47.60
|
|
|
|
31.59
|
|
|
|
25.80
|
|
|
|
37.75
|
|
|
|
31.00
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1Q
|
|
|
62.50
|
|
|
|
45.00
|
|
|
|
52.50
|
|
|
|
40.61
|
|
|
|
31.22
|
|
|
|
23.90
|
|
|
|
37.22
|
|
|
|
26.57
|
|
2Q
|
|
|
72.09
|
|
|
|
55.44
|
|
|
|
58.70
|
|
|
|
46.75
|
|
|
|
35.84
|
|
|
|
28.61
|
|
|
|
43.91
|
|
|
|
34.44
|
|
3Q
|
|
|
55.01
|
|
|
|
33.80
|
|
|
|
46.04
|
|
|
|
30.30
|
|
|
|
28.56
|
|
|
|
15.32
|
|
|
|
34.50
|
|
|
|
16.70
|
|
4Q
|
|
|
36.39
|
|
|
|
22.10
|
|
|
|
32.70
|
|
|
|
20.24
|
|
|
|
17.70
|
|
|
|
7.95
|
|
|
|
18.61
|
|
|
|
8.80
|
|
1Q 2009
|
|
|
38.75
|
|
|
|
27.69
|
|
|
|
32.48
|
|
|
|
23.89
|
|
|
|
14.70
|
|
|
|
10.36
|
|
|
|
17.70
|
|
|
|
11.90
|
|
December 2008
|
|
|
30.30
|
|
|
|
23.55
|
|
|
|
26.39
|
|
|
|
21.50
|
|
|
|
11.67
|
|
|
|
8.72
|
|
|
|
13.57
|
|
|
|
9.65
|
|
January 2009
|
|
|
33.94
|
|
|
|
27.69
|
|
|
|
29.37
|
|
|
|
23.89
|
|
|
|
13.21
|
|
|
|
10.56
|
|
|
|
15.11
|
|
|
|
11.90
|
|
February 2009
|
|
|
38.75
|
|
|
|
30.50
|
|
|
|
32.48
|
|
|
|
26.51
|
|
|
|
14.70
|
|
|
|
10.36
|
|
|
|
17.70
|
|
|
|
12.00
|
|
March 2009
|
|
|
33.32
|
|
|
|
29.12
|
|
|
|
28.40
|
|
|
|
25.25
|
|
|
|
12.78
|
|
|
|
10.40
|
|
|
|
14.96
|
|
|
|
11.94
|
|
April 2009(1)
|
|
|
35.89
|
|
|
|
31.50
|
|
|
|
30.42
|
|
|
|
27.05
|
|
|
|
13.97
|
|
|
|
11.93
|
|
|
|
16.37
|
|
|
|
13.82
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Until April 16, 2009.
|
TRADING
MARKETS
Our publicly traded share capital consists of common shares and
preferred shares, each without par value. Our common shares and
our preferred shares are publicly traded in Brazil on the
BOVESPA, under the ticker symbols VALE3 and VALE5, respectively.
Our common shares and preferred shares also trade on the
LATIBEX, under the ticker symbols XVALO and XVALP, respectively.
The LATIBEX is a non-regulated electronic market created in 1999
by the Madrid stock exchange in order to enable trading of Latin
American equity securities.
Our common ADSs, each representing one common share, are traded
on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), under the
ticker symbol RIO. Our preferred ADSs, each representing one
preferred share, are traded on the NYSE, under the ticker symbol
RIOPR. Our common ADSs and preferred ADSs are traded on Euronext
Paris, under the ticker symbols VALE3 and VALE5, respectively.
JPMorgan Chase Bank serves as the depositary for both the common
and the preferred ADSs.
On March 31, 2009, there were 1,542,052,176 ADSs
outstanding, representing 37.7% of our preferred shares and
23.0% of our common shares, or 28.7% of our total share capital.
|
|
Item 10.
|
Additional
information
|
Vales legal name is Companhia Vale do Rio Doce. Vale is a
stock corporation, or sociedade por ações, duly
organized on January 11, 1943, and existing under the laws
of the Federative Republic of Brazil. Vale
129
was privatized in three stages between 1997 and 2002, beginning
with the sale by the Brazilian government of a controlling stake
in Vale to Valepar in 1997. The last stage of the privatization
process took place in 2002, when the Brazilian government sold
its remaining minority stake of common shares through a global
equity offering. Vale is organized for an unlimited period of
time. Its head offices are located at Avenida Graça Aranha,
No. 26,
20030-900
Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil, and its telephone number is
55-21-3814-4477.
MEMORANDUM
AND ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION
Company
objectives and purposes
Our corporate purpose is defined by our bylaws to include:
|
|
|
|
|
the exploitation of mineral deposits in Brazil and abroad by
means of extraction, processing, industrialization,
transportation, shipment and commerce of mineral goods;
|
|
|
|
the building and operation of railways and the exploitation of
own or unrelated-party rail traffic;
|
|
|
|
the building and operation of our own or unrelated-party
maritime terminals, and the exploitation of nautical activities
for the provision of support within the harbor;
|
|
|
|
the provision of logistics services integrated with cargo
transport, comprising generation, storage, transshipment,
distribution and delivery within the context of a multimodal
transport system;
|
|
|
|
the production, processing, transport, industrialization and
commerce of all and any source and form of energy, also
involving activities of production, generation, transmission,
distribution and commerce of its products, derivatives and sub
products;
|
|
|
|
the carrying-on, in Brazil or abroad, of other activities that
may be of direct or indirect consequence for the achievement of
its corporate purpose, including research, industrialization,
purchase and sale, importation and exportation, the
exploitation, industrialization and commerce of forest resources
and the provision of services of any kind whatsoever; and
|
|
|
|
constituting or participating in any fashion in other companies,
consortia or associations directly or indirectly related to its
business purpose.
|
Directors
powers
Under Brazilian corporate law, if a director or an executive
officer has a conflict of interest with the company in
connection with any proposed transaction, the director or
executive officer may not vote in any decision of the board of
directors or of the board of executive officers regarding such
transaction and must disclose the nature and extent of the
conflicting interest for transcription in the minutes of the
meeting. In any case, a director or an executive officer may not
transact any business with the company, including any
borrowings, except on reasonable or fair terms and conditions
that are identical to the terms and conditions prevailing in the
market or offered by unrelated parties. Under our bylaws,
shareholders set the aggregate compensation payable to directors
and executive officers. The Board of Directors allocates the
compensation among its members and the executive officers. See
Item 6. Directors, management and
employeesCompensation. Our bylaws do not establish any
mandatory retirement age limits.
COMMON
SHARES AND PREFERRED SHARES
Set forth below is certain information concerning our authorized
and issued share capital and a brief summary of certain
significant provisions of our bylaws and the Brazilian corporate
law. This description does not purport to be complete and is
qualified by reference to our bylaws (an English translation of
which has been filed with the SEC) and to the Brazilian
corporate law.
130
General
Our bylaws authorize the issuance of up to 3.6 billion
common shares and up to 7.2 billion preferred shares, in
each case based solely on the approval of the Board of Directors
without any additional shareholder approval.
Each common share entitles the holder thereof to one vote at
meetings of our shareholders. Holders of common shares are not
entitled to any preference relating to our dividends or other
distributions.
Holders of preferred shares and the golden shares are generally
entitled to the same voting rights as holders of common shares,
except with respect to the election of members of the Board of
Directors, and are entitled to a minimum annual non-cumulative
preferential dividend of (i) at least 3% of the book value
per share, calculated in accordance with the financial
statements, which serve as reference for the payment of
dividends, or (ii) 6% of their pro rata share of our
paid-in capital, whichever is higher. Non-controlling
shareholders holding common shares representing at least 15% of
our voting capital, and preferred shares representing at least
10% of our total share capital, have the right to appoint each
one member and an alternate to our Board of Directors. If no
group of common or preferred shareholders meets the thresholds
described above, shareholders holding preferred or common shares
representing at least 10% of our total share capital are
entitled to combine their holdings to appoint one member and an
alternate to our Board of Directors. Holders of preferred
shares, including the golden shares, may elect one member of the
permanent Fiscal Council and the respective alternate.
Non-controlling holders of common shares comprising at least 10%
of the common shares outstanding may also elect one member of
the Fiscal Council and an alternate.
The Brazilian government holds 12 golden shares of Vale. The
golden shares are preferred shares that entitle its holder to
the same rights (including with respect to voting and dividend
preference) as holders of preferred shares. In addition, the
holder of the golden shares is entitled to veto any proposed
action relating to the following matters:
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
a change in our name;
|
|
|
(2)
|
a change in the location of our head office;
|
|
|
(3)
|
a change in our corporate purpose as regards the mining
activities;
|
|
|
(4)
|
any liquidation of our company;
|
|
|
(5)
|
any disposal or winding up of activities of any one or more of
the following stages of our iron ore mining integrated systems:
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
mineral deposits, ore deposits, mines;
|
|
|
(b)
|
railways; or
|
|
|
(c)
|
ports and maritime terminals;
|
|
|
|
|
(6)
|
any change in the bylaws relating to the rights accorded to the
classes of capital stock issued by us; and
|
|
|
(7)
|
any change in the bylaws relating to the rights accorded the
golden shares.
|
Calculation
of distributable amount
At each annual shareholders meeting, the Board of
Directors is required to recommend, based on the executive
officers proposal, how to allocate our earnings for the
preceding fiscal year. For purposes of the Brazilian corporate
law, a companys net income after income taxes and social
contribution taxes for such fiscal year, net of any accumulated
losses from prior fiscal years and amounts allocated to
employees and managements participation in earnings
represents its net profits for such fiscal year. In
accordance with the Brazilian corporate law, an amount equal to
our net profits, as further reduced by amounts
allocated to the legal reserve, to the contingency reserve or to
the unrealized income reserve established by us in compliance
131
with applicable law (discussed below) and increased by reversals
of reserves constituted in prior years, will be available for
distribution to shareholders in any particular year. Such
amount, the adjusted net profits, is herein referred to as the
distributable amount. We may also establish discretionary
reserves, reserves for investment projects and fiscal investment
reserves, as discussed below.
Legal reserve. Under Brazilian corporate law,
we are required to maintain a legal reserve to which we must
allocate 5% of our net profits for each fiscal year
until the amount of the reserve equals 20% of our paid-in
capital. Capital increases and net losses, if any, may be
charged against the legal reserve.
Depletion reserve. Our bylaws provide for one
depletion reserve, which has not been used since 1996, when the
related tax incentive expired.
Reserve for investment in projects. Under
Brazilian corporate law, we may allocate a portion of our
net profits to discretionary appropriations for
plant expansion and other capital investment projects. Our
bylaws provide for a reserve for investment in projects, but
whenever the amount allocated to this reserve exceeds 50% of
distributable net profits, such allocation has to be based on a
capital budget approved by shareholders. Capital budgets with a
duration longer than one year must be reviewed at each annual
shareholders meeting. After completion of the relevant
capital projects, we may retain the appropriation until our
shareholders vote to transfer all or a portion of the reserve to
capital or retained earnings.
Contingency reserve. Under Brazilian corporate
law, a portion of our net profits may also be
discretionally allocated to a contingency reserve
for an anticipated loss of an estimated amount that is deemed
probable in future years. Any amount so allocated in a prior
year must be either reversed in the fiscal year in which the
loss was anticipated if such loss does not in fact occur or
charged off in the event that the anticipated loss occurs. We
have never allocated an amount to the contingency reserve.
Unrealized income reserve. Under Brazilian
corporate law, the amount by which the mandatory dividend
exceeds the realized portion of net profits for any
particular year may be allocated to the unrealized income
reserve. The realized portion of net profits is the
amount by which net profits exceed the sum of: (i) our net
positive results, if any, from the equity method of accounting
for earnings and losses of our subsidiaries and certain
affiliates, and (ii) the profits, income or net gains
obtained on transactions, or the accounting for assets and
liabilities at market value, where the financial realization
occurs after the end of the following fiscal year.
Tax incentive investment reserve. Under
Brazilian corporate law, a portion of net profits
may also be allocated to a general tax incentive
investment reserve in amounts corresponding to reductions
in our income tax generated by credits for particular
government-approved investments.
The Brazilian corporate law provides that all discretionary
allocations of net profits, including discretionary
reserves, the contingency reserve, the unrealized income reserve
and the reserve for investment projects, are subject to approval
by the shareholders voting at the annual meeting and can be
transferred to capital or used for the payment of dividends in
subsequent years. The fiscal incentive investment reserve and
legal reserve are also subject to approval by the shareholders
voting at the annual meeting and may be transferred to capital
but are not available for the payment of dividends in subsequent
years.
The sum of the legal reserve, the depletion reserve and the
reserve for investment in projects may not exceed the amount of
our paid-in capital. When such limit is reached, our
shareholders may vote to use the excess to pay in capital,
increase capital or distribute dividends.
Our calculation of net profits and allocations to
reserves for any fiscal year are determined on the basis of
financial statements prepared in accordance with Brazilian
corporate law. Our consolidated financial statements have been
prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and, although our
allocations to reserves and dividends will be reflected in these
financial statements, investors will not be able to calculate
such allocations or required dividend amounts from our
consolidated financial statements.
132
Mandatory
dividend
Brazilian corporate law and our bylaws prescribe that we must
distribute to our shareholders in the form of dividends or
interest on shareholders equity an annual amount equal to
not less than 25% of the distributable amount, referred to as
the mandatory dividend, unless the Board of Directors advises
our shareholders at our general shareholders meeting that
payment of the mandatory dividend for the preceding year is
inadvisable in light of our financial condition. To date, our
Board of Directors has never determined that payment of the
mandatory dividend was inadvisable. The Fiscal Council must
review any such determination and report it to the shareholders.
In addition to the mandatory dividend, our Board of Directors
may recommend to the shareholders payment of dividends from
other funds legally available therefore. Any payment of interim
dividends will be netted against the amount of the mandatory
dividend for that fiscal year. The shareholders must also
approve the recommendation of the Board of Directors with
respect to any required distribution. The amount of the
mandatory dividend is subject to the size of the legal reserve,
the contingency reserve, and the unrealized income reserve. The
amount of the mandatory dividend is not subject to the size of
the discretionary depletion reserve. See Item 10.
Additional informationCommon shares and preferred
sharesCalculation of distributable amount.
Dividend
preference of preferred shares
Pursuant to our bylaws, holders of preferred shares and the
golden shares are entitled to a minimum annual non-cumulative
preferential dividend equal to (i) at least 3% of the book
value per share, calculated in accordance with the financial
statements which serve as reference for the payment of
dividends, or (ii) 6% of their pro rata share of our
paid-in capital, whichever is higher. To the extent that we
declare dividends in any particular year in amounts which exceed
the preferential dividends on preferred shares, and after
holders of common shares have received distributions equivalent,
on a per share basis, to the preferential dividends on preferred
shares, holders of common shares and preferred shares shall
receive the same additional dividend amount per share. Since the
first step of our privatization in 1997, we have had sufficient
distributable amounts to be able to distribute equal amounts to
both common and preferred shareholders.
Other
matters relating to our preferred shares
Our bylaws do not provide for the conversion of preferred shares
into common shares. In addition, the preferred shares do not
have any preference upon our liquidation and there are no
redemption provisions associated with the preferred shares.
Distributions
classified as shareholders equity
Pursuant to a change in Brazilian tax law effective
January 1, 1996, Brazilian companies are permitted to pay
limited amounts to shareholders and treat such payments as an
expense for Brazilian income tax purposes. In accordance with
Law No. 9,249 dated December 26, 1995, our bylaws
provide for the distribution of interest on shareholders
equity as an alternative form of payment to shareholders. The
interest rate applied is limited to the Brazilian long-term
interest rate, or TJLP, for the applicable period. The deduction
of the amount of interest paid cannot exceed the greater of
(1) 50% of net income (after the deduction of the provision
of social contribution on net profits and before the deduction
of the provision of the corporate income tax) before taking into
account any such distribution for the period in respect of which
the payment is made or (2) 50% of the sum of retained
earnings and profit reserves. Any payment of interest on
shareholders equity to shareholders is subject to
Brazilian withholding income tax at the rate of 15%, except for
a beneficiary located in a tax haven jurisdiction (i.e. a
country that does not impose income tax or that imposes it at a
maximum rate lower than 20%), in which case the rate is 25%.
Under our bylaws, the amount paid to shareholders as interest on
shareholders equity (net of any withholding tax) may be
included as part of any mandatory and minimum dividend. Under
Brazilian corporate law, we are obligated to distribute to
shareholders an amount sufficient to ensure that the net amount
received, after payment by us of applicable Brazilian
withholding taxes in respect of the distribution of interest on
shareholders equity, is at least equal to the mandatory
dividend.
133
Mandatorily
convertible notes
In 2007, our wholly-owned subsidiary Vale Capital Limited issued
mandatorily convertible notes in two series, both due
June 15, 2010. The series RIO notes
(US$1.296 billion principal amount) are mandatorily
convertible into ADSs representing an aggregate maximum of
56,582,040 common shares. The series RIO P notes
(US$584 million principal amount) are mandatorily
convertible into ADSs representing an aggregate maximum of
30,295,456 preferred shares. Both series can convert before
maturity under specified circumstances. The conversion rate for
both series will depend on the market price of the ADSs on the
conversion date. Under the indentures governing the notes,
additional interest is due to each noteholder in an amount in
U.S. dollars equal to any cash distribution net of any
applicable withholding tax and fees paid by the Depositary of
our ADSs to the holder of one ADS, multiplied by the number of
ADSs that would be received by the noteholder upon conversion of
the notes at the conversion rate specified in the applicable
indenture.
Voting
rights
Each common share entitles the holder thereof to one vote at
meetings of our shareholders. Holders of preferred shares are
entitled to the same voting rights as holders of common shares
except that they may not vote on the election of members of the
Board of Directors, except in the event of dividend arrearages,
as described below. One of the members of the permanent Fiscal
Council and his or her alternate are elected by majority vote of
the holders of preferred shares. Holders of preferred shares and
common shares may, in certain circumstances, combine their
respective holdings to elect members of our Board of Directors,
as described under Item 10. Additional
informationCommon shares and preferred
sharesGeneral.
The golden shares entitle the holder thereof to the same voting
rights as holders of preferred shares. The golden shares also
confer certain other significant voting rights in respect of
particular actions, as described under Item 10.
Additional informationCommon shares and preferred
sharesGeneral.
Brazilian corporate law provides that non-voting or
restricted-voting shares, such as the preferred shares, acquire
unrestricted voting rights beginning when a company has failed
for three consecutive fiscal years (or for any shorter period
set forth in a companys constituent documents) to pay any
fixed or minimum dividend to which such shares are entitled and
continuing until payment thereof is made. Our bylaws do not set
forth any such shorter period.
Any change in the preferences or advantages of our preferred
shares, or the creation of a class of shares having priority
over the preferred shares, would require the approval of the
holder of the golden shares, who can veto such matters, as well
as the approval of the holders of a majority of the outstanding
preferred shares, voting as a class at a special meeting.
Shareholders
meetings
A general shareholders meeting convenes each year to
decide all matters relating to our corporate purposes and to
pass such resolutions as they deem necessary for our protection
and well being.
Pursuant to Brazilian corporate law, shareholders voting at a
general shareholders meeting have the power, among other
powers, to:
|
|
|
|
|
amend the bylaws;
|
|
|
|
elect or dismiss members of the Board of Directors and members
of the Fiscal Council at any time;
|
|
|
|
establish the remuneration of senior management and members of
the Fiscal Council;
|
|
|
|
receive annual reports by management and accept or reject
managements financial statements and recommendations
including the allocation of net profits and the distributable
amount for payment of the mandatory dividend and allocation to
the various reserve accounts;
|
134
|
|
|
|
|
authorize the issuance of convertible and secured debentures;
|
|
|
|
suspend the rights of a shareholder in default of obligations
established by law or by the bylaws;
|
|
|
|
accept or reject the valuation of assets contributed by a
shareholder in consideration for issuance of capital stock;
|
|
|
|
pass resolutions to reorganize our legal form, to merge,
consolidate or split us, to dissolve and liquidate us, to elect
and dismiss our liquidators and to examine their
accounts; and
|
|
|
|
authorize management to file for bankruptcy or to request a
concordata.
|
All shareholders meetings, including the annual
shareholders meeting, are convened by publishing, no fewer
than 15 days prior to the scheduled meeting date and no
fewer than three times, a notice in the Diário Oficial
do Estado do Rio de Janeiro and in a newspaper with general
circulation in the city where we have our registered office, in
Rio de Janeiro. Our shareholders have previously designated
Jornal do Commercio for this purpose. Also, as our shares
are traded on the BOVESPA, we must publish a notice in a
São Paulo based newspaper. Such notice must contain the
agenda for the meeting and, in the case of an amendment to our
bylaws, an indication of the subject matter. In addition, under
our bylaws, the holder of the golden shares is entitled to a
minimum of 15 days prior formal notice to its legal
representative of any general shareholders meeting to
consider any proposed action subject to the veto rights accorded
to the golden shares. See Item 10. Additional
informationCommon shares and preferred
sharesGeneral.
A shareholders meeting may be held if shareholders
representing at least one-quarter of the voting capital are
present except for meetings convened to amend our bylaws, which
require a quorum of at least two-thirds of the voting capital.
If no such quorum is present, notice must again be given in the
same manner as described above except for the
eight-days
prior notice, and a meeting may then be convened without any
specific quorum requirement, subject to the minimum quorum and
voting requirements for certain matters, as discussed below. A
shareholder without a right to vote may attend a general
shareholders meeting and take part in the discussion of
matters submitted for consideration.
Except as otherwise provided by law, resolutions of a
shareholders meeting are passed by a simple majority vote,
abstentions not being taken into account. Under Brazilian
corporate law, the approval of shareholders representing at
least one-half of the issued and outstanding voting shares is
required for the types of action described below, as well as, in
the case of clause (a) and clause (b), a majority of issued
and outstanding shares of the affected class:
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
creating a new class of preferred shares or disproportionately
increasing an existing class of preferred shares relative to the
other classes of shares, other than to the extent permitted by
the bylaws;
|
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
changing a priority, preference, right, privilege or condition
of redemption or amortization of any class of preferred shares
or creating any class of non-voting preferred shares that has a
priority, preference, right, condition or redemption or
amortization superior to an existing class of shares, such as
the preferred shares;
|
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
reducing the mandatory dividend;
|
|
|
|
|
(d)
|
changing the corporate purposes;
|
|
|
|
|
(e)
|
merging us with another company or consolidating or splitting us;
|
|
|
|
|
(f)
|
dissolving or liquidating us;
|
|
|
|
|
(g)
|
participating in a centralized group of companies as defined
under Brazilian corporate law; and
|
|
|
(h)
|
canceling any ongoing liquidation of us.
|
135
Whenever the shares of any class of capital stock are entitled
to vote, each share is entitled to one vote. Annual
shareholders meetings must be held by April 30 of each
year. Shareholders meetings are called, convened and
presided over by the chairman or by the vice-chairman of our
Board of Directors. A shareholder may be represented at a
general shareholders meeting by an attorney-in-fact
appointed not more than one year before the meeting, who must be
a shareholder, a company officer or a lawyer. For a public
company, such as us, the attorney-in-fact may also be a
financial institution.
Redemption
rights
Our common shares and preferred shares are not redeemable,
except that a dissenting shareholder is entitled under Brazilian
corporate law to obtain redemption upon a decision made at a
shareholders meeting by shareholders representing at least
50% of the voting shares:
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
to create a new class of preferred shares or to
disproportionately increase an existing class of preferred
shares relative to the other classes of shares (unless such
actions are provided for or authorized by the bylaws);
|
|
|
(2)
|
to modify a preference, privilege or condition of redemption or
amortization conferred on one or more classes of preferred
shares, or to create a new class with greater privileges than
the existing classes of preferred shares;
|
|
|
(3)
|
to reduce the mandatory distribution of dividends;
|
|
|
(4)
|
to change our corporate purposes;
|
|
|
(5)
|
to merge us with another company or consolidate us;
|
|
|
(6)
|
to transfer all of our shares to another company in order to
make us a wholly-owned subsidiary of such company, a stock
merger;
|
|
|
(7)
|
to approve the acquisition of control of another company at a
price which exceeds certain limits set forth in Brazilian
corporate law;
|
|
|
(8)
|
to approve our participation in a centralized group of companies
as defined under Brazilian corporate law; or
|
|
|
(9)
|
in the event that the entity resulting from (a) a merger,
(b) a stock merger as described in clause (6) above or
(c) a spin-off that we conduct fails to become a listed
company within 120 days of the general shareholders
meeting at which such decision was taken.
|
Only holders of shares adversely affected by the changes
mentioned in items (1) and (2) above may require us to
redeem their shares. The right of redemption mentioned in items
(5), (6) and (8) above may only be exercised if our
shares do not satisfy certain tests of liquidity at the time of
the shareholder resolution. The right of redemption lapses
30 days after publication of the minutes of the relevant
general shareholders meeting, unless, in the case of items
(1) and (2) above, the resolution is subject to
confirmation by the preferred shareholders (which must be made
at a special meeting to be held within one year), in which case
the 30-day
term is counted from the publication of the minutes of the
special meeting.
We would be entitled to reconsider any action giving rise to
redemption rights within 10 days following the expiration
of such rights if the redemption of shares of dissenting
shareholders would jeopardize our financial stability. Law
No. 9,457, dated May 5, 1997, which amended the
Brazilian corporate law, contains provisions, which, among other
provisions, restrict redemption rights in certain cases and
allow companies to redeem their shares at their economic value,
subject to certain requirements. Our bylaws currently do not
provide that our capital stock will be redeemable at its
economic value and, consequently, any redemption pursuant to
Brazilian corporate law would be made at no less than the book
value per share, determined on the basis of the last balance
sheet approved by the shareholders; provided that if the
general shareholders meeting giving rise to redemption
rights occurred more than 60 days after the date of the
last approved
136
balance sheet, a shareholder would be entitled to demand that
his or her shares be valued on the basis of a new balance sheet
dated within 60 days of such general shareholders
meeting.
Preemptive
rights
Each of our shareholders has a general preemptive right to
subscribe for shares in any capital increase, in proportion to
his or her shareholding. A minimum period of 30 days
following the publication of notice of a capital increase is
assured for the exercise of the right, and the right is
negotiable. Under our bylaws and Brazilian corporate law, our
Board of Directors may decide not to extend preemptive rights to
our shareholders, or to reduce the
30-day
period for the exercise of preemptive rights, in each case with
respect to any issuance of shares, debentures convertible into
shares or warrants in the context of a public offering, subject
to the limit on the number of shares that may be issued with the
approval of the board without any additional shareholder
approval. In the event of a capital increase that would maintain
or increase the proportion of capital represented by preferred
shares, holders of preferred American Depositary Receipts will
have preemptive rights to subscribe only to newly issued
preferred shares. In the event of a capital increase that would
reduce the proportion of capital represented by preferred
shares, shareholders will have preemptive rights to subscribe
for preferred shares, in proportion to their shareholdings, and
for common shares only to the extent necessary to prevent
dilution of their overall interest in us. In the event of a
capital increase that would maintain or increase the proportion
of capital represented by common shares, shareholders will have
preemptive rights to subscribe only to newly issued common
shares. In the event of a capital increase that would reduce the
proportion of capital represented by common shares, holders of
common shares will have preemptive rights to subscribe for
preferred shares only to the extent necessary to prevent
dilution of their overall interest in us.
Tag-along
rights
According to Brazilian corporate law, in the event of a sale of
control of a company, the acquirer is obliged to offer to
holders of common voting shares the right to sell their shares
for a price equal to at least 80% of the price paid for the
common voting shares representing control.
Form and
transfer
Our preferred shares and common shares are in book-entry form
registered in the name of each shareholder or its nominee. The
transfer of such shares is made under Brazilian corporate law,
which provides that a transfer of shares is effected by our
transfer agent, Banco Bradesco S.A., upon presentation of valid
share transfer instructions to us by a transferor or its
representative. When preferred shares or common shares are
acquired or sold on a Brazilian stock exchange, the transfer is
effected on the records of our transfer agent by a
representative of a brokerage firm or the stock exchanges
clearing system. Transfers of shares by a foreign investor are
made in the same way and are executed by the investors
local agent, who is also responsible for updating the
information relating to the foreign investment furnished to the
Central Bank.
The BOVESPA operates a central clearing system through
Companhia Brasileira de Liquidação e
Custódia, or CBLC. A holder of our shares may
participate in this system and all shares elected to be put into
the system will be deposited in custody with CBLC (through a
Brazilian institution that is duly authorized to operate by the
Central Bank and maintains a clearing account with CBLC). The
fact that such shares are subject to custody with the relevant
stock exchange will be reflected in our registry of
shareholders. Each participating shareholder will, in turn, be
registered in the register of our beneficial shareholders that
is maintained by CBLC and will be treated in the same way as
registered shareholders.
MATERIAL
CONTRACTS
For information concerning our material contracts, see
Item 4. Information on the company, Item 5.
Operating and financial review and prospects, and
Item 7. Related party transactions.
137
EXCHANGE
CONTROLS AND OTHER LIMITATIONS
AFFECTING SECURITY HOLDERS
There are no restrictions on ownership of our capital stock by
individuals or legal entities domiciled outside Brazil. However,
the right to convert dividend payments and proceeds from the
sale of preferred shares or common shares into foreign currency
and to remit such amounts outside Brazil is subject to
restrictions under foreign investment legislation which
generally requires, among other things, that the relevant
investment be registered with the Central Bank of Brazil. These
restrictions on the remittance of foreign capital abroad could
hinder or prevent the custodian for the preferred shares or
common shares represented by ADSs, or holders who have exchanged
ADSs for preferred shares or common shares, from converting
dividends, distributions or the proceeds from any sale of
preferred shares or common shares, as the case may be, into
U.S. dollars and remitting such U.S. dollars abroad.
Delays in, or refusal to grant any required government approval
for conversions of Brazilian currency payments and remittances
abroad of amounts owed to holders of ADSs could adversely affect
holders of ADRs.
Under Resolution No. 2,689/2000, foreign investors may
invest in almost all financial assets and engage in almost all
transactions available in the Brazilian financial and capital
markets, provided that certain requirements are fulfilled. In
accordance with Resolution No. 2,689/2000, the definition
of foreign investor includes individuals, legal entities, mutual
funds and other collective investment entities, domiciled or
headquartered outside Brazil.
Under Resolution No. 2,689/2000, a foreign investor must:
|
|
|
|
|
appoint at least one representative in Brazil, with powers to
perform actions relating to its investment,
|
|
|
|
complete the appropriate foreign investor registration form,
|
|
|
|
register as a foreign investor with the CVM, and
|
|
|
|
register its foreign investment with the Central Bank.
|
Securities and other financial assets held by foreign investors
pursuant to Resolution No. 2,689/2000 must be registered or
maintained in deposit accounts or under the custody of an entity
duly licensed by the Central Bank or the CVM. In addition,
securities trading is restricted to transactions carried out on
stock exchanges or through organized over-the-counter markets
licensed by the CVM, except for subscription, bonification,
conversion of debentures into shares, securities indexes,
purchase and sale of investment funds quotas and, if permitted
by the CVM, going-private transactions, canceling or suspension
of trading. Moreover, the offshore transfer or assignment of the
securities or other financial assets held by foreign investors
pursuant to Resolution No. 2,689/2000 is prohibited, except
for transfers resulting from a corporate reorganization, or
occurring upon the death of an investor by operation of law or
will.
Resolution No. 1,927/1992 of the National Monetary Council,
which is the restated and amended Annex V to Resolution
No. 1,289/1997, provides for the issuance of depositary
receipts in foreign markets in respect of shares of Brazilian
issuers. It provides that the proceeds from the sale of ADSs by
holders of ADRs outside Brazil are free of Brazilian foreign
investment controls and holders of ADSs who are not resident in
a tax haven jurisdiction (i.e., a country or location
that does not impose taxes on income or where the maximum income
tax rate is lower than 20%, or where the legislation imposes
restrictions on disclosure of the shareholding composition or
the ownership of the investment) will be entitled to favorable
tax treatment.
An electronic registration has been issued to the custodian in
the name of the depositary with respect to the ADSs. Pursuant to
this electronic registration, the custodian and the depositary
are able to convert dividends and other distributions with
respect to the underlying shares into foreign currency and to
remit the proceeds outside Brazil. If a holder exchanges ADSs
for preferred shares or common shares, the holder may continue
to rely on the custodians electronic registration for only
five business days after the exchange. After
138
that, the holder must seek to obtain its own electronic
registration with the Central Bank under Law No. 4,131/1962
or Resolution No. 2,689/2000. Thereafter, unless the holder
has registered its investment with the Central Bank, such holder
may not convert into foreign currency and remit outside Brazil
the proceeds from the disposition of, or distributions with
respect to, such preferred shares or common shares.
Under Brazilian law, whenever there is a serious imbalance in
Brazils balance of payments or reasons to foresee a
serious imbalance, the Brazilian government may impose temporary
restrictions on the remittance to foreign investors of the
proceeds of their investments in Brazil, and on the conversion
of Brazilian currency into foreign currencies. Such restrictions
may hinder or prevent the custodian or holders who have
exchanged ADSs for underlying preferred shares or common shares
from converting distributions or the proceeds from any sale of
such shares, as the case may be, into U.S. dollars and
remitting such U.S. dollars abroad. In the event the
custodian is prevented from converting and remitting amounts
owed to foreign investors, the custodian will hold the reais
it cannot convert for the account of the holders of American
Depositary Receipts who have not been paid. The depositary will
not invest the reais and will not be liable for interest
on those amounts. Furthermore, any reais so held will be
subject to devaluation risk against the U.S. dollar.
TAXATION
The following summary contains a description of the principal
Brazilian and U.S. federal income tax consequences of the
ownership and disposition of preferred shares, common shares or
ADSs. You should know that this summary does not purport to be a
comprehensive description of all the tax considerations that may
be relevant to a holder of preferred shares, common shares or
ADSs.
Holders of preferred shares, common shares, or ADSs should
consult their own tax advisors to discuss the tax consequences
of the purchase, ownership and disposition of preferred shares,
common shares or ADSs, including, in particular, the effect of
any state, local or other national tax laws.
Although there is at present no treaty to avoid double taxation
between Brazil and the United States, but only a common
understanding between the two countries according to which
income taxes paid in one may be offset against taxes to be paid
in the other, both countries tax authorities have been
having discussions that may result in the execution of such a
treaty. In this regard, the two countries signed a Tax
Information Exchange Agreement on March 20, 2007. We cannot
predict whether or when such a treaty will enter into force or
how, if entered into, such a treaty will affect the
U.S. holders, as defined below, of preferred shares, common
shares, or ADSs.
Brazilian
tax considerations
The following discussion summarizes the principal Brazilian tax
consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of
preferred shares, common shares or ADSs by a holder not deemed
to be domiciled in Brazil for purposes of Brazilian taxation
(Non-Brazilian Holder). It is based on the tax laws
of Brazil and regulations thereunder in effect on the date
hereof, which are subject to change (possibly with retroactive
effect). This discussion does not specifically address all of
the Brazilian tax considerations applicable to any particular
Non-Brazilian Holder. Therefore, each Non-Brazilian Holder
should consult his or her own tax advisor concerning the
Brazilian tax consequences of an investment in preferred shares,
common shares, or ADSs.
Shareholder
distributions
Brazilian corporations, such as us, classify for tax purposes
distributions to shareholders as either dividends or interest on
shareholders equity.
Dividends. Amounts distributed as dividends,
including distributions in kind, will generally not be subject
to income tax withholding if the distribution is paid by us from
profits of periods beginning on or after January 1, 1996
(1) to the depositary in respect of the preferred shares or
common shares underlying the ADSs or (2) to a Non-Brazilian
Holder in respect of preferred shares or common shares.
Dividends paid from
139
profits generated before January 1, 1996 may be
subject to Brazilian withholding income tax at varying rates
depending on the year the profits were generated.
Interest on shareholders equity. Amounts
distributed as interest on shareholders equity are
generally subject to income tax withholding at the rate of 15%,
except if:
|
|
|
|
|
the beneficiary is exempt from tax in Brazil, in which case the
distribution is free of Brazilian tax, or
|
|
|
|
the beneficiary is located in a Tax Haven Jurisdiction (as
defined below) (a Tax Haven Holder), in which case
the applicable income tax withholding rate is 25%.
|
Interest on shareholders equity is calculated as a
percentage of shareholders equity, as stated in the
statutory accounting records. The interest rate applied may not
exceed the TJLP, as determined by the Central Bank of Brazil
from time to time. In addition, the amount of distributions
classified as interest on shareholders equity may not be
more than the greater of (1) 50% of net income (after the
deduction of the provision of social contribution on net profits
but before taking into account such payment of interest and the
provision of corporate income tax) for the period in respect of
which the payment is made, or (2) 50% of the sum of
retained earnings and profit reserves as of the date of the
beginning of the fiscal year in respect of which the payment is
made. Payments of interest on shareholders equity are
deductible for corporate income tax and social contribution on
net profit purposes, to the extent of the limits described
above. Therefore, the benefit to us, as opposed to making a
distribution classified as a dividend payment, is a reduction in
our corporate taxes charge equivalent to 34% of such amount.
Taxation of capital gains. Taxation of
Non-Brazilian Holders for capital gains depends on the status of
the holder as either:
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
not resident or domiciled in a Tax Haven Jurisdiction (as
defined below) and registered with the Central Bank of Brazil
and the CVM to invest in Brazil in accordance with Resolution
No. 2,689, or a holder of ADSs; or
|
|
|
(2)
|
any other Non-Brazilian Holder whose investment is not
registered with the Central Bank and Non-Brazilian Holders
resident in a Tax Haven Jurisdiction (i.e., a
jurisdiction that does not impose income tax or where the
maximum income tax rate is lower than 20% or where internal
legislation imposes restrictions on the disclosure of share or
investment ownership).
|
Investors identified in item (1) are subject to favorable
tax treatment, as described below.
According to Law No. 10,833, dated December 29, 2003,
capital gains realized by a Non-Brazilian Holder from the
disposition of assets located in Brazil are subject
to taxation in Brazil.
Preferred shares and common shares qualify as assets located in
Brazil, and the disposition of such assets by a Non-Brazilian
Holder may be subject to income tax on the gains assessed, in
accordance with the rules described below, regardless of where
or with whom the transaction is carried out.
There is some uncertainty as to whether ADSs qualify as
assets located in Brazil for purposes of Law
No. 10,833/03. Arguably, ADSs do not constitute assets
located in Brazil and therefore the gains realized by a
Non-Brazilian Holder on the disposition of ADSs to another
Non-Brazilian resident should not be subject to tax in Brazil.
However, we cannot assure you that the Brazilian courts would
uphold this interpretation of the definition of assets
located in Brazil in connection with the taxation of gains
realized by a Non-Brazilian Holder on the disposition of ADSs.
Consequently, gains on a disposition of ADSs by a Non-Brazilian
Holder (whether in a transaction carried out with another
Non-Brazilian Holder or a person domiciled in Brazil) may be
subject to income tax in Brazil in accordance with the rules
applicable to a disposition of shares.
140
Although there are grounds to sustain otherwise, the deposit of
preferred shares or common shares in exchange for ADSs may be
subject to Brazilian income tax if the acquisition cost of the
preferred shares or common shares is lower than the average
price of such shares, which is calculated as either:
|
|
|
|
(i)
|
the average price per preferred share or common share on the
Brazilian stock exchange in which the greatest number of such
shares were sold on the day of deposit; or
|
|
|
|
|
(ii)
|
if no preferred shares or common shares were sold on that day,
the average price on the Brazilian stock exchange in which the
greatest number of preferred shares or common shares were sold
in the 15 trading sessions immediately preceding such deposit.
|
The difference between the acquisition cost and the average
price of the preferred shares or common shares calculated as
described above will be considered to be a capital gain subject
to taxation. There are grounds to sustain that such taxation is
not applicable with respect to investors registered under the
rules of Resolution No. 2,689/2000, provided these are not
Tax Haven Holders.
The withdrawal of ADSs in exchange for preferred shares or
common shares is not subject to Brazilian income tax, assuming
compliance with applicable regulations regarding the
registration of the investment with the Brazilian Central Bank.
For purposes of Brazilian taxation, the income tax rules on
gains related to disposition of preferred shares or common
shares vary depending on:
|
|
|
|
|
the domicile of the Non-Brazilian Holder;
|
|
|
|
the method by which such Non-Brazilian Holder has registered its
investment with the Central Bank; and/or
|
|
|
|
how the disposition is carried out, as described below.
|
The gain realized as a result of a transaction on a Brazilian
stock, future and commodities exchange is the difference
between: (i) the amount in Brazilian currency realized on
the sale or disposition and (ii) the acquisition cost,
without any adjustment for inflation, of the shares sold.
Capital gains realized by a Non-Brazilian Holder on a sale or
disposition of preferred shares or common shares carried out on
a Brazilian stock exchange (which includes the transactions
carried out on the organized over-the-counter market) are:
|
|
|
|
|
exempt from income tax when the Non-Brazilian Holder
(i) has registered its investment in Brazil with the
Central Bank in accordance with Resolution No. 2,689/2000
(a 2,689 holder) and (ii) is not a Tax Haven
Holder; or
|
|
|
|
in all other cases, subject to income tax at a 15% rate. In
these cases, a withholding income tax at a rate of 0.005% of the
sale value is levied on the transaction and can be offset with
the eventual income tax due on the capital gain.
|
Any other gains assessed on a sale or disposition of preferred
shares or common shares that is not carried out on a Brazilian
stock exchange are subject to income tax at a 15%
rate except for gains realized by Tax Haven Holders,
which are subject to income tax at a 25% rate.
With respect to transactions conducted on the Brazilian
non-organized over-the-counter market, with brokerage, a
withholding income tax at a rate of 0.005% on the sale value is
also levied on the transaction and can be offset against the
eventual income tax due on the capital gain. There can be no
assurance that the current favorable treatment of 2,689 holders
will continue in the future.
In the case of a redemption of preferred shares, common shares,
or ADSs or a capital reduction by a Brazilian corporation, the
positive difference between the amount received by the
Non-Brazilian Holder and
141
the acquisition cost of the preferred shares, common shares or
ADSs redeemed is treated as capital gain derived from the sale
or exchange of shares not carried out on a Brazilian stock
exchange market and is therefore generally subject to income tax
at the rate of 15%, while the 25% rate applies to Tax Haven
Holders.
Any exercise of preemptive rights relating to the preferred
shares or common shares will not be subject to Brazilian
taxation. Any gains realized by a Non-Brazilian Holder on the
disposition of preemptive rights relating to preferred shares or
common shares in Brazil will be subject to Brazilian income
taxation in accordance with the same rules applicable to the
sale or disposition of preferred shares or common shares.
Tax on
foreign exchange and financial transactions
Foreign exchange transactions. Brazilian law
imposes a tax on foreign exchange transactions, or the
IOF/Exchange Tax. The IOF/Exchange Tax applies to the conversion
of reais into foreign currency and to the conversion of
foreign currency into reais. Currently, for most foreign
currency exchange transactions, the IOF/Exchange Tax is assessed
at a rate of 0.38%, although other rates may apply to particular
operations. Starting March 17, 2008, certain foreign
exchange transactions are not subject to the IOF/Exchange Tax,
namely those relating to share transactions carried out on a
stock exchange or in a public offering registered with the CVM,
or for the underwriting of shares, provided that the issuer is
authorized to trade its shares at the stock exchange and, as
long as supported by Decree No 6,391 of the National Monetary
Council. The same applies for dividends and interest on
shareholders equity. The Brazilian government may increase
the rate at any time up to 25% of the foreign exchange
transaction amount. However, any increase in rates cannot be
applied retroactively.
Transactions involving bonds and
securities. Brazilian law imposes a tax on
transactions involving bonds and securities, or the IOF/Bonds
Tax, including those carried out on a Brazilian stock exchange.
The rate of IOF/Bonds Tax applicable to transactions involving
preferred shares, common shares or ADSs is currently zero. The
Brazilian government may increase such rate at any time up to
1.5% of the transaction amount per day, but the tax cannot be
applied retroactively.
Temporary contribution on financial
transactions. Until December 31, 2007, as a
general rule, transactions carried out in Brazil that resulted
in the transfer of funds from an account maintained with a
Brazilian financial institution were subject to the temporary
contribution on financial transactions, or the CPMF Tax, which
was levied at a rate of 0.38% on any bank account withdrawals.
However, as of January 1, 2008, the CPMF Tax is no longer
in force and is not applicable to any transaction carried out
after that date.
Other Brazilian taxes. There are no Brazilian
inheritance, gift or succession taxes applicable to the
ownership, transfer or disposition of preferred shares, common
shares or ADSs by a Non-Brazilian Holder, except for gift and
inheritance taxes which are levied by some states of Brazil on
gifts made or inheritances bestowed by a Non-Brazilian Holder to
individuals or entities resident or domiciled within such states
in Brazil. There are no Brazilian stamp, issue, registration, or
similar taxes or duties payable by holders of preferred shares
or common shares or ADSs.
U.S.
federal income tax considerations
This summary does not purport to be a comprehensive description
of all the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the
acquisition, holding or disposition of the preferred shares,
common shares or ADSs. This summary applies to
U.S. holders, as defined below, who hold their preferred
shares, common shares or ADSs as capital assets and does not
apply to special classes of holders, such as:
|
|
|
|
|
certain financial institutions,
|
|
|
|
insurance companies,
|
142
|
|
|
|
|
dealers in securities or foreign currencies,
|
|
|
|
tax-exempt organizations,
|
|
|
|
securities traders who elect to account for their investment in
preferred shares, common shares or American Depository Shares on
a mark-to-market basis,
|
|
|
|
persons holding preferred shares, common shares or ADSs as part
of hedge, straddle, conversion or other integrated financial
transaction for tax purposes,
|
|
|
|
holders whose functional currency for U.S. federal income
tax purposes is not the U.S. dollar,
|
|
|
|
partnerships or other holders treated as pass-through
entities for U.S. federal income tax purposes,
|
|
|
|
persons subject to the alternative minimum tax, or
|
|
|
|
persons owning, actually or constructively, 10% or more of our
voting shares.
|
This discussion is based on the Internal Revenue Code of 1986,
as amended to the date hereof, administrative pronouncements,
judicial decisions and final, temporary and proposed Treasury
Regulations, all as in effect on the date hereof. These
authorities are subject to differing interpretations and may be
changed, perhaps retroactively, so as to result in
U.S. federal income tax consequences different from those
discussed below. There can be no assurance that the
U.S. Internal Revenue Service (the IRS) will
not challenge one or more of the tax consequences discussed
herein or that a court will not sustain such a challenge in the
event of litigation. This summary does not address any aspect of
state, local or
non-U.S. tax
law.
HOLDERS SHOULD CONSULT THEIR TAX ADVISORS WITH REGARD TO THE
APPLICATION OF THE U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX LAWS TO THEIR
PARTICULAR SITUATIONS AS WELL AS ANY TAX CONSEQUENCES ARISING
UNDER THE LAWS OF ANY STATE, LOCAL OR
NON-U.S. TAXING
JURISDICTION.
This discussion is also based, in part, on representations of
the depositary and the assumption that each obligation in the
deposit agreement and any related agreement will be performed in
accordance with its terms.
As used herein, the term U.S. holder means a
beneficial owner of preferred shares, common shares, or ADSs
that is, for U.S. federal income tax purposes:
|
|
|
|
|
a citizen or resident alien individual of the United States,
|
|
|
|
a corporation created or organized in or under the laws of the
United States or of any political subdivision thereof, or
|
|
|
|
otherwise subject to U.S. federal income taxation on a net
income basis with respect to the preferred shares, common
shares, or ADSs.
|
The term U.S. holder also includes certain former citizens
of the United States.
The U.S. federal income tax treatment of a partner in a
partnership (or any other entity classified as a pass
through entity for U.S. federal income tax purposes)
that holds preferred shares, common shares or ADSs generally
will depend on such partners particular circumstances and
on the activities of the partnership. Partners in such
partnerships (or other pass-through entities) should consult
their own tax advisors.
In general, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, holders
of American depositary receipts evidencing ADSs will be treated
as the beneficial owners of the preferred shares or common
shares represented by those ADSs. Deposits and withdrawals of
preferred shares or common shares by holders in exchange for
ADSs will not result in the realization of gain or loss for
U.S. federal income tax purposes.
143
Taxation
of dividends
The gross amount of a distribution paid on ADSs, preferred
shares or common shares, including distributions paid in the
form of payments of interest on capital for Brazilian tax
purposes, out of our current or accumulated earnings and profits
(as determined for U.S. federal income tax purposes) will
be taxable to you as foreign source dividend income and will not
be eligible for the dividends-received deduction allowed to
corporate shareholders under U.S. federal income tax law.
The amount of any such distribution will include the amount of
Brazilian withholding taxes, if any, withheld on the amount
distributed. To the extent that a distribution exceeds our
current and accumulated earnings and profits, such distribution
will be treated as a nontaxable return of capital to the extent
of your basis in the ADSs, preferred shares or common shares, as
the case may be, with respect to which such distribution is
made, and thereafter as a capital gain.
You will be required to include dividends paid in reais
in income in an amount equal to their U.S. dollar value
calculated by reference to an exchange rate in effect on the
date such distribution is received by the depositary, in the
case of ADSs, or by you, in the case of common shares or
preferred shares. If the depositary or you do not convert such
reais into U.S. dollars on the date they are
received, it is possible that you will recognize foreign
currency loss or gain, which would be ordinary loss or gain,
when the reais are converted into U.S. dollars. If
you hold ADSs, you will be considered to receive a dividend when
the dividend is received by the depositary.
Subject to certain exceptions for short-term and hedged
positions, the U.S. dollar amount of dividends received by
certain noncorporate taxpayers, including individuals, prior to
January 1, 2011 with respect to the ADSs will be subject to
taxation at a maximum rate of 15% if the dividends are
qualified dividends. Dividends paid on the ADSs will
be treated as qualified dividends if (i) the ADSs are
readily tradable on an established securities market in the
United States and (ii) the company was not, in the year
prior to the year in which the dividend was paid, and is not, in
the year in which the dividend is paid, a passive foreign
investment company (PFIC). The ADSs are listed on
the New York Stock Exchange and will qualify as readily tradable
on an established securities market in the United States so long
as they are so listed. Based on Vales audited financial
statements and relevant market and shareholder data, Vale
believes that it was not treated as a PFIC for U.S. federal
income tax purposes with respect to its 2007 or 2008 taxable
year. In addition, based on Vales audited financial
statements and its current expectations regarding the value and
nature of its assets, the sources and nature of its income, and
relevant market and shareholder data, Vale does not anticipate
becoming a PFIC for its 2009 taxable year.
Based on existing guidance, it is not entirely clear whether
dividends received with respect to the preferred shares and
common shares will be treated as qualified dividends (and
therefore whether such dividends will qualify for the maximum
rate of taxation of 15%), because the preferred shares and
common shares are not themselves listed on a U.S. exchange.
In addition, the U.S. Treasury has announced its intention
to promulgate rules pursuant to which holders of ADSs, preferred
shares or common stock and intermediaries through whom such
securities are held will be permitted to rely on certifications
from issuers to establish that dividends are treated as
qualified dividends. Because such procedures have not yet been
issued, it is unclear whether we will be able to comply with
them. Holders of ADSs, preferred shares and common shares should
consult their own tax advisors regarding the availability of the
reduced dividend tax rate in the light of their own particular
circumstances.
Subject to generally applicable limitations and restrictions,
you will be entitled to a credit against your United States
federal income tax liability, or a deduction in computing your
U.S. federal taxable income, for Brazilian income taxes
withheld by us. You must satisfy minimum holding period
requirements to be eligible to claim a foreign tax credit for
Brazilian taxes withheld on dividends. The limitation on foreign
taxes eligible for credit is calculated separately for specific
classes of income. For this purpose dividends paid by us on our
shares will generally constitute passive income.
Foreign tax credits may not be allowed for withholding taxes
imposed in respect of certain short-term or hedged positions in
securities or in respect of arrangements in which a
U.S. holders expected economic profit is
insubstantial. U.S. holders should consult their own tax
advisors concerning the implications of these rules in light of
their particular circumstances.
144
Taxation
of capital gains
Upon a sale or exchange of preferred shares, common shares or
ADSs, you will recognize a capital gain or loss for
U.S. federal income tax purposes equal to the difference,
if any, between the amount realized on the sale or exchange and
your adjusted tax basis in the preferred shares, common shares
or ADSs. This gain or loss will be long-term capital gain or
loss if your holding period in the preferred shares, common
shares or ADSs exceeds one year. The net amount of long-term
capital gain recognized by individual U.S. holders prior to
January 1, 2011 generally is subject to taxation at a
maximum rate of 15%. Your ability to use capital losses to
offset income is subject to limitations.
Any gain or loss will be U.S. source gain or loss for
U.S. foreign tax credit purposes. Consequently, if a
Brazilian withholding tax is imposed on the sale or disposition
of ADSs, preferred shares or common shares, and you do not
receive significant foreign source income from other sources you
may not be able to derive effective U.S. foreign tax credit
benefits in respect of such Brazilian withholding tax. You
should consult your own tax advisor regarding the application of
the foreign tax credit rules to your investment in, and
disposition of, ADSs, preferred shares or common shares.
If a Brazilian tax is withheld on the sale or disposition of
shares, the amount realized by a U.S. holder will include
the gross amount of the proceeds of such sale or disposition
before deduction of the Brazilian tax. See Item 10.
Additional informationTaxationBrazilian tax
considerations.
Information
reporting and backup withholding
Information returns may be filed with the Internal Revenue
Service in connection with distributions on the preferred
shares, common shares or ADSs and the proceeds from their sale
or other disposition. You may be subject to United States backup
withholding tax on these payments if you fail to provide your
taxpayer identification number or comply with certain
certification procedures or otherwise establish an exemption
from backup withholding. If you are required to make such a
certification or to establish such an exemption, you generally
must do so on IRS
Form W-9.
The amount of any backup withholding from a payment to you will
be allowed as a credit against your U.S. federal income tax
liability and may entitle you to a refund, provided that the
required information is timely furnished to the Internal Revenue
Service.
DOCUMENTS
ON DISPLAY
We are subject to the information requirements of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and accordingly file reports
and other information with the SEC. Reports and other
information filed by us with the SEC may be inspected and copied
at the public reference facilities maintained by the SEC at
100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. You
can obtain further information about the operation of the Public
Reference Room by calling the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330.
You may also inspect Vales reports and other information
at the offices of the New York Stock Exchange, 11 Wall Street,
New York, New York 10005, on which Vales ADSs are listed.
Our SEC filings are also available to the public from the
SECs website at
http://www.sec.gov.
For further information on obtaining copies of Vales
public filings at the New York Stock Exchange, you should call
(212) 656-5060.
We also file financial statements and other periodic reports
with the CVM.
145
|
|
Item 11.
|
Quantitative
and qualitative disclosures about market risk
|
RISK
MANAGEMENT
The aim of our risk management strategy is to promote
enterprise-wide risk management, through an integrated framework
that considers the impact on our business of not only market
risks but also of credit and operational risks. The benefit of
this integrated framework, which accounts for all kinds of
corporate risks as well as the correlations among different
market risk factors, is to enable us to accurately evaluate risk
after accounting for all of the natural hedges in Vales
portfolio. Using this framework highlights the diversification
of our mix of products and currencies, which tends to reduce our
overall risk.
We consider the effective management of risk a key objective to
support our growth strategy and financial flexibility.
Mitigating future cash flow risk enhances our credit quality,
improves our ability to access different credit markets and
reduces our cost of capital. In furtherance of this objective,
our Board of Directors has established an enterprise-wide risk
management policy and a risk management committee. Our risk
management strategy is designed to address market risk as well
as credit and operational risks to our business. Our strategy is
intended to promote the following principles: (1) enhance
the capital structure, (2) support the long-term corporate
strategy, (3) maintain financial flexibility, and
(4) implement best practices in corporate governance.
Our risk management policy requires that we regularly evaluate
cash flow risk and, when necessary, analyze and propose risk
mitigation strategies to reduce cash flow volatility. It
explicitly prohibits speculative transactions with derivatives
and requires diversification of transactions types and of
counterparties.
The risk management committee is responsible for assisting our
executive officers in overseeing and reviewing information
regarding our enterprise risk management activities, including
principles, significant policies, risk management processes and
procedures, and risk management instruments. The risk management
committee reports periodically to the Executive Board, and the
Executive Board is responsible for the evaluation and approval
of long-term risk mitigation strategies recommended by the risk
management committee. As of April 2009, the members of the risk
management committee were: Fabio de Oliveira Barbosa, Chief
Financial Officer, Tito Martins, Executive Officer (Non-ferrous
Minerals), Guilherme Cavalcanti, Corporate Finance Director, and
Jennifer Maki, Vale Inco Chief Financial Officer.
In addition to our risk management governance model, we also
rely on a well-defined corporate structure. Different and
independent departments recommend and implement derivative
transactions. The risk management department is responsible for
defining and proposing to the risk management committee market
risk mitigation strategies consistent with our corporate
strategy. The corporate finance department is responsible for
the execution of risk mitigation strategies through the use of
derivatives. The independence of these departments provides
effective control over these operations.
The consolidated market risk exposure and portfolio of
derivatives are measured monthly and monitored in order to
evaluate the financial results and the possible risk impacts on
our cash flows, monitoring achievement of the initial goals. The
mark-to-market on the derivatives portfolio is reported weekly
to management. We also periodically review the credit limits and
creditworthiness of our hedging counterparties.
Considering the nature of our business and operations, the
principal market risks we face are:
|
|
|
|
|
interest rate risk,
|
|
|
|
exchange rate risk,
|
|
|
|
product price risk, and
|
|
|
|
input price risk.
|
146
We mitigate operational risk by establishing new controls,
improving existing ones, obtaining insurance and establishing
financial provisions. As a result, we have a clear view of our
major operational risks, the best mitigation plans on a
cost-benefit basis, and the controls to monitor them.
We recognize all derivatives on our balance sheet at fair value,
and the gain or loss in fair value is accrued in our current
earnings, in accordance with SFAS 133, Accounting for
Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities,
as amended by SFAS 137 and SFAS 138. Fair value
accounting and the mark-to-market of derivatives may introduce
unintended volatility in our quarterly earnings. However, it
does not generate volatility in our cash flows, given the nature
of our derivatives transactions.
The asset (liability) balances at December 31, 2008 and
2007 and the movement in fair value of derivative financial
instruments are shown in the following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
rates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(LIBOR)/
|
|
|
Aluminum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
currencies
|
|
|
products
|
|
|
Copper
|
|
|
Nickel
|
|
|
Platinum
|
|
|
Gold
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Fair value at January 1, 2007
|
|
US$
|
(10)
|
|
|
US$
|
(318)
|
|
|
US$
|
(298)
|
|
|
US$
|
16
|
|
|
US$
|
(20)
|
|
|
US$
|
(53)
|
|
|
US$
|
(683)
|
|
Financial settlement
|
|
|
(290)
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
(38)
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) in the year
|
|
|
854
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
(129)
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
(17)
|
|
|
|
(7)
|
|
|
|
917
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
(45)
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9)
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) at December 31, 2007
|
|
US$
|
626
|
|
|
US$
|
(98)
|
|
|
US$
|
(188)
|
|
|
US$
|
42
|
|
|
US$
|
(24)
|
|
|
US$
|
(36)
|
|
|
US$
|
322
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value at January 1, 2008
|
|
US$
|
626
|
|
|
US$
|
(98)
|
|
|
US$
|
(188)
|
|
|
US$
|
42
|
|
|
US$
|
(24)
|
|
|
US$
|
(36)
|
|
|
US$
|
322
|
|
Financial settlement
|
|
|
(394)
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) in the year
|
|
|
(682)
|
|
|
|
(18)
|
|
|
|
(29)
|
|
|
|
(46)
|
|
|
|
(6)
|
|
|
|
(30)
|
|
|
|
(811)
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes
|
|
|
(123)
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
(57)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) December 31, 2008
|
|
US$
|
(573)
|
|
|
US$
|
0
|
|
|
US$
|
0
|
|
|
US$
|
32
|
|
|
US$
|
0
|
|
|
US$
|
0
|
|
|
US$
|
(541)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
rate and exchange rate risks
Our cash flows are exposed to the volatility of several
different currencies. While most of our product prices,
representing around 91% of total revenue, are denominated or
indexed to the U.S. dollar, most our costs, disbursements
and investments are denominated or indexed to other currencies,
mainly reais and Canadian dollars.
Derivative instruments may be used in order to reduce potential
cash flow volatility arising from the currency mismatch between
our debt service and our revenues. Our currency and interest
rate derivative portfolio consists basically of swaps to convert
floating cash flows in reais to fixed or floating
U.S. dollar cash flows, without any leverage.
We are also exposed to interest rate risk on loans and
financings. Our U.S. dollar-denominated floating rate debt
consists mainly of loans, including export pre-payments,
commercial bank loans and multilateral organization loans. In
general, interest on our U.S. dollar floating rate debt is
based on LIBOR (London Interbank Offer Rate in
U.S. dollars). To mitigate the impact of interest rate
volatility on our cash flows, we take advantage of natural
hedges resulting from the positive correlation of metal prices
and U.S. dollar floating rates. Where natural hedges are
not present, we may opt to realize the same effect using
financial instruments.
Our floating rate debt denominated in reais includes
debentures, loans obtained from BNDES and property and service
acquisition financing in the Brazilian market. Interest on these
obligations is mainly
147
based on the CDI (Interbank Deposit Certificate), the benchmark
interest rate in the Brazilian interbank market, and the TJLP,
the benchmark Brazilian long-term interest rate.
The following table sets forth our floating and fixed rate
long-term debt, categorized by Brazilian local and foreign
currency, and as a percentage of our total long-term debt
portfolio at the dates indicated, including loans from unrelated
parties, except for accrued charges and translation adjustments,
as reflected in our consolidated financial statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(US$ million, except percentages)
|
|
|
Floating rate debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real-denominated
|
|
|
5,071
|
|
|
|
27.4%
|
|
|
|
4,374
|
|
|
|
24.5%
|
|
Denominated in other currencies
|
|
|
6,272
|
|
|
|
33.8%
|
|
|
|
6,612
|
|
|
|
37.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
11,343
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,987
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real-denominated
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
0%
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
0%
|
|
Denominated in other currencies
|
|
|
7,180
|
|
|
|
38.8%
|
|
|
|
6,868
|
|
|
|
38.5%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
18,525
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
17,857
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
Accrued charges
|
|
|
331
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
311
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
18,856
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,168
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table provides information about our debt
obligations as of December 31, 2008. It presents the
principal cash flows and related weighted average interest rates
of these obligations by expected maturity date. Weighted average
variable interest rates are based on the applicable reference
rate at December 31, 2008. Actual cash flows of these debt
obligations are denominated mainly in U.S. dollars or
reais, as indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value
|
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cash flow
|
|
|
|
interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
at
|
|
|
|
rate(1)(2)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
To 2036
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
12/31/08(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
US$-denominated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonds
|
|
|
6.83%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
407.5
|
|
|
|
123.4
|
|
|
|
5,965.7
|
|
|
|
6,508.0
|
|
|
|
5,752.7
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
2.74%
|
|
|
|
12.4
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30.3
|
|
|
|
50.6
|
|
|
|
50.6
|
|
Securitization notes
|
|
|
5.58%
|
|
|
|
55.2
|
|
|
|
57.5
|
|
|
|
30.0
|
|
|
|
32.5
|
|
|
|
30.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
205.2
|
|
|
|
210.4
|
|
Floating rate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
2.74%
|
|
|
|
199.4
|
|
|
|
290.4
|
|
|
|
505.3
|
|
|
|
262.8
|
|
|
|
245.7
|
|
|
|
683.8
|
|
|
|
2,187.4
|
|
|
|
1,996.5
|
|
Trade finance
|
|
|
2.40%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,250.0
|
|
|
|
2,025.0
|
|
|
|
375.0
|
|
|
|
400.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,050.0
|
|
|
|
3,698.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
267.0
|
|
|
|
1,608.4
|
|
|
|
2,567.6
|
|
|
|
1,079.3
|
|
|
|
799.1
|
|
|
|
6,679.8
|
|
|
|
13,001.2
|
|
|
|
11,708.8
|
|
Real-denominated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate loans
|
|
|
12.90%
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
Floating rate loans
|
|
|
12.90%
|
|
|
|
32.5
|
|
|
|
674.3
|
|
|
|
34.3
|
|
|
|
45.4
|
|
|
|
1,744.9
|
|
|
|
1,842.8
|
|
|
|
4,374.3
|
|
|
|
4,400.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.5
|
|
|
|
674.3
|
|
|
|
34.3
|
|
|
|
45.4
|
|
|
|
1,744.9
|
|
|
|
1,843.9
|
|
|
|
4,375.4
|
|
|
|
4,401.6
|
|
Denominated in other currencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate loans
|
|
|
9.33%
|
|
|
|
6.24
|
|
|
|
10.84
|
|
|
|
5.45
|
|
|
|
5.60
|
|
|
|
5.30
|
|
|
|
71.5
|
|
|
|
104.5
|
|
|
|
105.0
|
|
Floating rate loans
|
|
|
3.88%
|
|
|
|
16.3
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
|
|
83.6
|
|
|
|
128.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
No maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
291.4
|
|
|
|
291.4
|
|
|
|
291.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
322.0
|
|
|
|
2,303.6
|
|
|
|
2,617.6
|
|
|
|
1,137.7
|
|
|
|
2,556.8
|
|
|
|
8,918.7
|
|
|
|
17,857
|
|
|
|
16,635
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Weighted average interest rates do
not take into account the effect of the derivatives.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Weighted average variable interest
rates are based on the applicable reference rate at
December 31, 2008.
|
148
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Includes only long-term debt
obligations.
|
We have entered into swaps to convert real-denominated
debt instruments linked to CDI or TJLP to U.S. dollar fixed
or floating rates. In fixed rate swaps, we pay fixed rates in
U.S. dollars and receive payments in reais linked to
the CDI or to the TJLP. In floating rate swaps, we pay a
floating rate in U.S. dollars linked to LIBOR and receive
payments in reais linked either to the CDI or the TJLP.
As of December 31, 2008, the value of our debt denominated
in reais swapped to U.S. dollars was
US$4.2 billion, with an average cost of 4.9% per year after
the currency swap. Our real-denominated debt matures from
November 2010 to December 2027, and interest payments are mainly
due on a semi-annual basis.
These swap transactions have settlement dates similar to the
interest and principal payment dates, taking into account the
liquidity restrictions of the market. At each settlement date
the results of the settlement of the swap transaction offset
part of the impact of the real/U.S. dollar exchange
rate in our obligations, contributing to a stable flow of cash
disbursements in U.S. dollars for the interest
and/or
principal payment of our real-denominated debt.
In the event of appreciation (depreciation) of the real
against the U.S. dollar, the negative (positive) impact
on our real-denominated debt obligations (interest
and/or
principal payment) measured in U.S. dollars will be largely
offset by a positive (negative) effect from any existing swap
transaction, regardless of the real/U.S. dollar
exchange rate on the payment date.
In the event of a sharp depreciation of the real against
the U.S. dollar, there would be the following effects:
|
|
|
|
|
Quarterly earnings: In the short term, the variation of
mark-to-market of the currency swaps would produce a negative
impact on our quarterly accounting earnings without any cash
effect.
|
|
|
|
Cash disbursement: Starting November 2010, at the settlement
date of the currency swap involving debt principal, we would
have a lower equivalent in U.S. dollar disbursement, with
the payment of debt principal offset by a disbursement with the
liquidation of the currency swap.
|
We have also entered into swaps to convert euro-denominated debt
with interest based on EURIBOR to U.S. dollar debt with
interest based on to LIBOR, and to convert U.S. dollar
floating rate debt with interest based on LIBOR into
U.S. dollar fixed rate debt.
We used to convert our Brazilian payroll denominated in reais
to U.S. dollars, employing currency swaps with monthly
settlement, hedging our cash flow. We decided on an early
settlement of our outstanding payroll hedging since part of the
cash obtained from our 2008 global equity offering was invested
in reais. The cash invested in real hedges our
cash flow to protect us against real volatility mostly
affecting our costs and investments.
149
The following table sets forth certain information about our
cross-currency swap transactions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2007
|
|
At December 31, 2008
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
Rate range
|
|
Rate range
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
Notional
|
|
Rate range
|
|
Rate range
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
Final
|
|
|
value
|
|
(payable)
|
|
(receivable)
|
|
gain (loss)
|
|
value
|
|
(payable)
|
|
(receivable)
|
|
gain (loss)
|
|
maturity
|
|
|
(US$ million, except interest rate ranges)
|
|
Real-denominated debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CDI vs. US$ floating rate swap
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
Libor+
0.676%
|
|
CDI+0.40%
|
|
|
30.7
|
|
|
|
430.0
|
|
|
Libor +
(0.676-0.99)%
|
|
CDI +
0.40%/
103.5% CDI
|
|
|
(95)
|
|
|
Jan 2015
|
CDI vs. US$ fixed rate swap
|
|
|
3,248
|
|
|
US$+(5.25
-5.98)%
|
|
(100-101.75%)
CDI
|
|
|
502.2
|
|
|
|
3,672
|
|
|
US$+
(0.90-5.98)%
|
|
(100-
103.5%)
CDI
|
|
|
(375)
|
|
|
Jan 2015
|
TJLP vs. US$ floating rate swap
|
|
|
56.3
|
|
|
Libor+
-(0.86-1)%
|
|
TJLP+1.80%
|
|
|
(1.4)
|
|
|
|
378
|
|
|
Libor +
-(1.89-0.86)%
|
|
TJLP +
(0.8-1.8)%
|
|
|
(29)
|
|
|
Dec 2019
|
TJLP vs. US$ fixed rate swap
|
|
|
85.2
|
|
|
US$+(3.57
-4.05)%
|
|
TJLP+1.8%
|
|
|
(4.3)
|
|
|
|
304
|
|
|
US$+
(2.83-4.30)%
|
|
TJLP
+(0.8-1.8)%
|
|
|
(61)
|
|
|
Dec 2019
|
Euro-denominated floating rate debt
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
|
Euribor+
0.875%
|
|
Libor+ 1.0425%
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
Euribor +
0.875%
|
|
Libor +
1.0425%
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
Dec 2011
|
US$ floating rate debt
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
US$+ 4.795%
|
|
Libor 3M
|
|
|
(4.9)
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
US$+4.76%
|
|
Libor 3M
|
|
|
(14)
|
|
|
Dec 2011
|
Cash flow hedging
|
|
|
814
|
|
|
R$+(-0.02
-17.4)%
|
|
100% CDI
|
|
|
105.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
US$
|
4,594
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$
|
631.4
|
|
|
US$
|
4,992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$
|
(572)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
price risk
We are exposed to various market risks relating to the
volatility of world market prices for the following products:
|
|
|
|
|
iron ore and iron ore pellets, which represented 57.4% of our
2008 gross consolidated revenues;
|
|
|
|
nickel, which represented 15.5% of our 2008 gross
consolidated revenues;
|
|
|
|
copper products, which represented 5.3% of our 2008 gross
consolidated revenues;
|
|
|
|
aluminum products, which represented 7.9% of our 2008 gross
consolidated revenues;
|
|
|
|
PGMs and other precious metals, which represented 1.3% of our
2008 gross consolidated revenues; and
|
|
|
|
other products.
|
Nickel
In order to maintain our exposure to nickel price fluctuations,
despite having fixed-price contracts to sell nickel, we entered
into derivative transactions converting our fixed-price
contracts to floating-price contracts. These transactions aim to
guarantee that when we deliver the product to the client, it has
the same average prices negotiated in the LME. This process
normally involves buying nickel forwards (over-the-counter) or
futures (exchange traded). These operations are usually settled
before maturity in order to match the settlement dates of the
fixed-price commercial contracts.
The following table sets forth certain information with respect
to our nickel derivatives related to our sales at
December 31, 2007 and 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2007
|
|
At December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Price
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
Final
|
|
|
Quantity
|
|
price
|
|
gain (loss)
|
|
Quantity
|
|
range
|
|
gain (loss)
|
|
maturity
|
|
|
(metric tons)
|
|
(US$ per
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
(metric tons)
|
|
(US$ per
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
metric ton)
|
|
|
|
|
|
metric ton)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nickel fixed-price program
|
|
|
8.229
|
|
|
|
19,950-46,300
|
|
|
|
(37.4)
|
|
|
|
10.140
|
|
|
|
9,355-37,480
|
|
|
|
(50)
|
|
|
|
Mar. 2011
|
|
150
Aluminum
We entered into hedging transactions aiming to reduce cash flow
volatility due to changes in LME aluminum prices. Usually these
transactions are implemented by the sale of forward
over-the-counter or future contracts, at the LME or by using
zero-cost collar contracts (purchase of put options associated
with the sale of call options). These transactions matured in
December 2008. The following table sets forth certain
information with respect to our aluminum derivatives portfolio
at December 31, 2007 and 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2007
|
|
|
At December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Final
|
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
range
|
|
|
gain (loss)
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
range
|
|
|
gain (loss)
|
|
|
maturity
|
|
|
|
(metric tons)
|
|
|
(US$ per
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
(metric tons)
|
|
|
(US$ per
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
metric ton)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
metric ton)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puts purchased
|
|
|
354,000
|
|
|
|
2,000-2,550
|
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forwards sold
|
|
|
48,000
|
|
|
|
2,200-2,750
|
|
|
|
(5.2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calls sold
|
|
|
354,000
|
|
|
|
2,300-3,150
|
|
|
|
(28.9)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other instruments
|
|
|
69,000
|
|
|
|
1,400-1,700
|
|
|
|
(54.7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(80.7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copper
We entered into hedging transactions to reduce cash flow
volatility due to changes in LME copper prices. These
transactions are usually implemented by the sale of forward
over-the-counter or future contracts, at the LME or the COMEX,
or by using zero-cost collar contracts. These transactions were
settled in December 2008. The following table sets forth certain
information with respect to our copper derivatives portfolio.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2007
|
|
|
At December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Final
|
|
|
|
Quantity
|
|
|
range
|
|
|
gain (loss)
|
|
|
Quantity
|
|
|
range
|
|
|
gain (loss)
|
|
|
maturity
|
|
|
|
(metric ton)
|
|
|
(US$ per
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
(metric tons)
|
|
|
(US$ per
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
metric ton)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
metric ton)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puts purchased
|
|
|
78,000
|
|
|
|
5,800-6,000
|
|
|
|
17.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calls sold
|
|
|
78,000
|
|
|
|
7,650-8,500
|
|
|
|
(18.1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puts purchased
|
|
|
9,996
|
|
|
|
2,485-2,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Range forward options
|
|
|
48,384
|
|
|
|
2,205-2,855
|
|
|
|
(186.8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gold
We entered into hedging transactions to reduce cash flow
volatility due to changes in gold prices, as gold is a
by-product of our copper production. These transactions are
usually implemented by the sale of forward contracts or
zero-cost collar contracts. These transactions matured in
December 2008. The following table sets forth certain
information with respect to our gold derivatives portfolio at
December 31, 2007 and 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2007
|
|
|
At December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Final
|
|
|
|
Quantity
|
|
|
range
|
|
|
gain (loss)
|
|
|
Quantity
|
|
|
range
|
|
|
gain (loss)
|
|
|
maturity
|
|
|
|
(oz.)
|
|
|
(US$ per oz.)
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
(oz.)
|
|
|
(US$ per oz.)
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puts purchased
|
|
|
77,700
|
|
|
|
305-345
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calls sold
|
|
|
82,740
|
|
|
|
353-426
|
|
|
|
(36.5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Platinum
We entered into hedging transactions to reduce cash flow
volatility due to changes in platinum prices. These transactions
are usually implemented by the sale of forward contracts
over-the-counter or at the LME and the COMEX or by using
zero-cost collar contracts. These transactions matured in
December 2008. The
151
following table sets forth certain information with respect to
our platinum derivatives portfolio at December 31, 2007 and
2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2007
|
|
At December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
Price
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Price
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
Final
|
|
|
Quantity
|
|
range
|
|
gain (loss)
|
|
Quantity
|
|
range
|
|
gain (loss)
|
|
maturity
|
|
|
(oz.)
|
|
(US$ per oz.)
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
(oz.)
|
|
(US$ per oz.)
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
|
Range forward options
|
|
|
34,644
|
|
|
|
675-830
|
|
|
|
(24.1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Input
price risk
We are exposed to various market risks relating to the
volatility of world market prices for the following inputs,
among others:
|
|
|
|
|
outsourced services, which represented 16.3% of our 2008 cost of
goods sold;
|
|
|
|
material, which represented 16.4% of our 2008 cost of goods sold;
|
|
|
|
energy, which represented 16.6% of our 2008 cost of goods sold;
|
|
|
|
acquisition of products, which represented 12.6% of our 2008
cost of goods sold; and
|
|
|
|
personnel, which represented 12.1% of our 2008 cost of goods
sold.
|
We may hedge certain input price risk with swap contracts,
long-term contracts, embedded derivatives or backward
integration.
Energy
As a large consumer of electricity, we are investing in power
generation projects and gas exploration to protect us against
volatility in the price of energy, regulatory uncertainties and
the risk of energy shortages. We own hydroelectricity power
generation plants in Brazil, Canada and Indonesia, and we
currently generate 34% of our worldwide electricity needs from
our own hydroelectric power plants.
We are developing hydroelectric and thermal power plants and
engaging in natural gas exploration programs in order to
increase our energy production and reduce our future exposure to
energy price and supply volatility.
Our subsidiary Albras has an embedded energy derivative, with
its electricity price linked to the price of aluminum. Albras
has a
20-year
contract, expiring in 2024, with Eletronorte, which provides for
a basic purchase price, in reais per MWh. In addition to
the basic price, there is a clause in the contract that requires
us to pay a premium if the price of primary aluminum trades in
the US$1,450 per metric ton to the US$2,773 per metric ton range
in the LME. This clause is an embedded derivative. It had an
unrealized loss of US$48 million as of December 31,
2008 and US$191 million as of December 31, 2007.
We have entered into derivatives in order to minimize the impact
of natural gas price volatility on the costs of our Canadian
nickel operations. These transactions are usually implemented
using swaps or by the purchase of forward contracts.
Under these contracts, we pay fixed prices for natural gas and
receive amounts based on monthly average spot prices. The
following table sets forth certain information about our natural
gas derivatives portfolio at December 31, 2007 and 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2007
|
|
At December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
Price
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Price
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
Final
|
|
|
Quantity
|
|
range
|
|
gain (loss)
|
|
Quantity
|
|
range
|
|
gain (loss)
|
|
maturity
|
|
|
(gigajoule)
|
|
(CAD per
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
(gigajoule)
|
|
(CAD per
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gigajoule)
|
|
|
|
|
|
gigajoule)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Swaps
|
|
|
5,476,500
|
|
|
|
7.34-8.48
|
|
|
|
(6.1)
|
|
|
|
1,773,000
|
|
|
|
7.34-7.97
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
Oct. 2009
|
|
152
Acquisition
of products
Nickel
The purchases of concentrate, cathode or other nickel metal for
use as feed in our processing facilities create price risk since
the feed price is generally fixed before the refined nickel is
available for sale. We have entered into hedging transactions
that aim to reduce cash flow volatility due to the price
mismatch. We enter into LME sell contracts to match the pricing
on the sale to the pricing of the purchase, or we sell nickel
forward or future contracts over-the-counter.
The following table sets forth certain information with respect
to our nickel purchase protection program at December 31,
2007 and 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2007
|
|
At December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
Price
|
|
Unrealized gain
|
|
|
|
Price
|
|
Unrealized gain
|
|
Final
|
|
|
Quantity
|
|
range
|
|
(loss)
|
|
Quantity
|
|
range
|
|
(loss)
|
|
maturity
|
|
|
(metric ton)
|
|
(US$ per
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
(metric ton)
|
|
(US$ per
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
metric ton)
|
|
|
|
|
|
metric ton)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nickel purchase protection program
|
|
|
3,072
|
|
|
|
25,565-32,890
|
|
|
|
15.9
|
|
|
|
4,944
|
|
|
|
9,117-16,900
|
|
|
|
(7)
|
|
|
|
Sep. 2009
|
|
Copper
We enter into hedging transactions to reduce cash flow
volatility due to the quotational period mismatch between the
pricing period of copper scrap purchases and the pricing period
of final product sales to the clients, as we buy copper scrap to
combine with other raw materials or inputs to produce copper.
This program is usually implemented by the sale of forwards
over-the-counter or futures at the LME.
The following table sets forth certain information with respect
to our copper scrap purchase protection program.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2007
|
|
|
At December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Unrealized gain
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Final
|
|
|
|
Quantity
|
|
|
range
|
|
|
(loss)
|
|
|
Quantity
|
|
|
range
|
|
|
gain (loss)
|
|
|
maturity
|
|
|
|
(metric ton)
|
|
|
(US$ per
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
(metric ton)
|
|
|
(US$ per
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
metric ton)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
metric ton)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Futures sold
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
6,622-8,080
|
|
|
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
3,743-6,895
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
March 2009
|
|
As of December 31, 2008, we had outstanding contracts to
purchase intermediate nickel and copper at provisional prices
based on commodity indices. For accounting purposes, we treated
the provisional pricing aspect of the contracts as an embedded
derivative. The unrealized gain on such embedded derivatives was
US$22 million at December 31, 2008 and
US$23 million at December 31, 2007.
Credit
risk
We are exposed to credit risk arising from trade receivables,
derivative transactions, payment guarantees and cash
investments. The credit risk process was implemented through a
set of credit risk governance documents that establish the
guidelines for granting counterparty limits and for measuring
and controlling credit exposure. The credit risk policy provides
a framework for assessing and managing counterparties
credit risk and for maintaining our risk at an acceptable level.
The policy also defines the role of the risk management
committee and the Executive Board. The risk management committee
analyzes and recommends to the Executive Board the maximum
credit risk exposure to trade receivables and the maximum credit
risk exposure to financial institutions that are acceptable at
both the counterparty and at the portfolio level.
We analyze and propose to the risk management committee credit
risk mitigation strategies to hedge our portfolio to avoid
concentration issues and, when necessary, to comply with the
acceptable risk levels established by the Executive Board. The
credit risk transactions implemented are strictly focused on
risk mitigation; speculative credit derivative transactions are
not permitted.
153
Customer credit quality is evaluated considering default
probability, measured by financial statements, company size,
past performance, country risk, credit rating, and equity and
credit market performance. A credit limit is established for
each customer in each business unit according to the guidelines
defined in our credit risk policy. Customers credit limits
are monitored according to their credit exposure and their
creditworthiness. Customer credit limits are updated annually.
If there are significant changes in the marketplace, we may
reevaluate the credit limits.
We are also exposed to financial institution credit risk arising
from our derivative transactions and our cash investments.
Financial institution credit quality is evaluated considering
default probability, evaluated by financial statements, foreign
and local currency credit ratings, and equity and credit market
performance. Financial institution credit quality is evaluated
at least annually according to our internal policy. Credit
exposure limits are submitted to the risk management committee
and to the Executive Board for approval. Our strategy may not be
effective in managing risks due to market fluctuations,
particularly those related to commodity prices, exchange rate
fluctuations, and changes in the composition of our sales.
|
|
Item 12.
|
Description
of securities other than equity securities
|
None.
PART II
|
|
Item 13.
|
Defaults,
dividend arrearages and delinquencies
|
None.
|
|
Item 14.
|
Material
modifications to the rights of security holders and use of
proceeds
|
None.
|
|
Item 15.
|
Controls
and procedures
|
EVALUATION
OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Our management, with the participation of our chief executive
officer and chief financial officer, has evaluated the
effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of
December 31, 2008. There are inherent limitations to the
effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and
procedures, including the possibility of human error and the
circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures.
Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures
can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control
objectives. Our chief executive officer and chief financial
officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and
procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that
information required to be disclosed by us in the reports filed
or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in
the applicable rules and forms, and that it is accumulated and
communicated to our management, including our chief executive
officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow
timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
MANAGEMENTS
REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting. Our internal
control over financial reporting is a process designed to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles. Our internal control over financial
reporting includes those policies and procedures that:
(i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in
reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company;
(ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are
recorded to permit preparation of financial statements in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and
that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made
only in accordance with authorizations of management and
directors of the company; and (iii) provide
154
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our assets that
could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness to
future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate and that the degree of compliance with the policies
or procedures may deteriorate.
Our management has assessed the effectiveness of Vales
internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2008 based on the criteria established in
Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by
the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO). Based on such assessment and
criteria, Our management has concluded that our internal control
over financial reporting was effective as of December 31,
2008. The effectiveness of our internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2008 has been audited by
PricewaterhouseCoopers Auditores Independentes, an independent
registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report
which appears herein.
CHANGES
IN INTERNAL CONTROLS
Our management identified no change in our internal control over
financial reporting during our fiscal year ended
December 31, 2008 that has materially affected or is
reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over
financial reporting.
|
|
Item 16A.
|
Audit
committee financial expert
|
As described in Item 16D of this
Form 20-F,
in lieu of establishing an independent audit committee, we have
given our Fiscal Council the necessary powers to qualify for the
exemption from the audit committee requirements set forth in
Exchange Act
Rule 10A-3(c)(3).
Our Board of Directors has determined that one of the members of
our Fiscal Council, Mr. Aníbal Moreira dos Santos, is
an audit committee financial expert. Mr. Moreira dos Santos
meets the applicable independence requirements for Fiscal
Council membership under Brazilian law. He also meets the NYSE
independence requirements that would apply to audit committee
members in the absence of our reliance on the exemption set
forth in Exchange Act
Rule 10A-3(c)(3).
Vale has adopted a code of ethical conduct that applies to all
board members, executive officers and employees, including the
chief executive officer, the chief financial officer and the
principal accounting officer. We have posted this code of
ethical conduct on our website at:
http://www.vale.com
(under English Version/Investors/Corporate Governance/Code of
Ethics). Copies of our code of ethical conduct may be obtained
without charge by writing to us at the address set forth on the
front cover of this
Form 20-F.
We have not granted any implicit or explicit waivers from any
provision of our code of ethical conduct since its adoption.
|
|
Item 16C.
|
Principal
accountant fees and services
|
PRINCIPAL
ACCOUNTANT FEES
PricewaterhouseCoopers Auditores Independentes billed the
following fees to us for professional services in 2007 and 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(US$ thousand)
|
|
|
Audit fees
|
|
|
7,385
|
|
|
|
8,327
|
|
Audit-related fees
|
|
|
614
|
|
|
|
777
|
|
Tax fees
|
|
|
327
|
|
|
|
512
|
|
All other fees
|
|
|
386
|
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fees
|
|
|
8,712
|
|
|
|
9,862
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155
Audit fees are the aggregate fees billed by
PricewaterhouseCoopers for the audit of our annual financial
statements and reviews of interim financial statements and
attestation services that are provided in connection with
statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.
Audit-related fees are fees charged by
PricewaterhouseCoopers for assurance and related services that
are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review
of our financial statements and are not reported under
Audit fees. In 2007 and 2008, Audit-related
fees consisted primarily of fees for services related to
due diligence and special reviews. Tax fees relate
primarily to the review of the annual federal tax return and
review of accuracy of the tax computation procedures with
respect to income tax and sales taxes.
AUDIT
COMMITTEE PRE-APPROVAL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
Our Fiscal Council currently serves as our audit committee for
purposes of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Pursuant to a
written policy, our Fiscal Council requires management to obtain
the Fiscal Councils approval before engaging any external
auditor to provide any audit or permitted non-audit services to
us or our consolidated subsidiaries.
Under the policy, the Fiscal Council has pre-approved a detailed
list of services based on detailed proposals from our auditors
up to specified monetary limits set forth in the policy.
Services that are not listed or that exceed the specified limits
must be separately pre-approved by the Fiscal Council. The
Fiscal Council is provided with reports on the services provided
under the policy on a periodic basis, and the list of
pre-approved services is updated periodically. The policy also
sets forth a list of prohibited services. Internal control
related services must be specifically pre-approved by the Fiscal
Council.
|
|
Item 16D.
|
Exemptions
from the listing standards for audit committees
|
We have designated and empowered our Fiscal Council to perform
the role of an audit committee pursuant to Exchange Act
Rule 10A-3.
We are required by both the SEC and the NYSE listed company
audit committee rules to comply with Exchange Act
Rule 10A-3,
which requires that we either establish an audit committee
composed of members of the Board of Directors that meets
specified requirements or designate and empower our Fiscal
Council to perform the role of the audit committee in reliance
on the exemption set forth in Exchange Act
Rule 10A-3(c)(3).
We believe our Fiscal Council satisfies the independence and
other requirements of Exchange Act
Rule 10A-3
that would apply in the absence of our reliance on the exemption.
|
|
Item 16E.
|
Purchases
of equity securities by the issuer and affiliated
purchasers
|
On October 16, 2008, our Board of Directors approved a
share buy-back program for the acquisition of up to 69,944,380
common shares and up to 169,210,249 preferred shares, to be
executed during 360 days. As of December 31, 2008, we
had acquired 18,355,859 common shares and 46,513,400 preferred
shares held in treasury for subsequent disposal or cancellation
at an average weighted unit cost of US$11.59.
156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total number of shares
|
|
|
Maximum number (or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(or units) purchased as
|
|
|
approximate US$ value)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
part of publicly
|
|
|
of shares (or units) that
|
|
|
|
Total number of shares
|
|
|
Average price paid per
|
|
|
announced plans or
|
|
|
may yet be purchased
|
|
Period
|
|
(or units) purchased
|
|
|
share (or units)
|
|
|
programs
|
|
|
under the program
|
|
|
Common shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 2008
|
|
|
988,900
|
|
|
|
11.03
|
|
|
|
988,900
|
|
|
|
68,955,480
|
|
November 2008
|
|
|
16,593,759
|
|
|
|
12.45
|
|
|
|
16,593,759
|
|
|
|
52,361,721
|
|
December 2008
|
|
|
773,200
|
|
|
|
11.61
|
|
|
|
773,200
|
|
|
|
51,588,521
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
18,355,859
|
|
|
|
12.34
|
|
|
|
18,355,859
|
|
|
|
51,588,521
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 2008
|
|
|
1,819,500
|
|
|
|
9.94
|
|
|
|
1,819,500
|
|
|
|
167,390,749
|
|
November 2008
|
|
|
43,284,400
|
|
|
|
11.39
|
|
|
|
43,284,400
|
|
|
|
124,106,349
|
|
December 2008
|
|
|
1,409,500
|
|
|
|
10.33
|
|
|
|
1,409,500
|
|
|
|
122,696,849
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
46,513,400
|
|
|
|
11.30
|
|
|
|
46,513,400
|
|
|
|
122,696,849
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 2008
|
|
|
2,808,400
|
|
|
|
10.33
|
|
|
|
2,808,400
|
|
|
|
236,346,229
|
|
November 2008
|
|
|
59,878,159
|
|
|
|
11.68
|
|
|
|
59,878,159
|
|
|
|
176,468,070
|
|
December 2008
|
|
|
2,182,700
|
|
|
|
10.78
|
|
|
|
2,182,700
|
|
|
|
174,285,370
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
64,869,259
|
|
|
|
11.59
|
|
|
|
64,869,259
|
|
|
|
174,285,370
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 16F.
|
Change
in registrants certifying accountant
|
Not applicable.
|
|
Item 16G.
|
Corporate
governance
|
Under NYSE rules, foreign private issuers are subject to a more
limited set of corporate governance requirements than
U.S. domestic issuers. As a foreign private issuer, we must
comply with four principal NYSE corporate governance rules:
(1) we must satisfy the requirements of Exchange Act
Rule 10A-3;
(2) our chief executive officer must promptly notify the
NYSE in writing after any executive officer becomes aware of any
material non-compliance with the applicable NYSE corporate
governance rules; (3) we must provide the NYSE with annual
and interim written affirmations as required under the NYSE
corporate governance rules; and (4) we must provide a brief
description of any significant differences between our corporate
governance practices and those followed by U.S. companies
under NYSE listing standards. The table below briefly describes
the significant differences between our domestic practice and
the NYSE corporate governance rules.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NYSE corporate governance rule for
|
|
|
Section
|
|
U.S. domestic issuers
|
|
Our approach
|
|
303A.01
|
|
A listed company must have a majority of independent directors.
Controlled companies are not required to comply with
this requirement.
|
|
We are a controlled company because more than a majority of our
voting power for the appointment of directors is controlled by
Valepar. As a controlled company, we would not be required to
comply with the majority of independent directors requirements
if we were a U.S. domestic issuer. There is no legal provision
or policy that requires us to have independent directors.
|
303A.03
|
|
The non-management directors of a listed company must meet at
regularly scheduled executive sessions without management.
|
|
Our non-management directors do not meet at regularly scheduled
executive sessions without management.
|
157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NYSE corporate governance rule for
|
|
|
Section
|
|
U.S. domestic issuers
|
|
Our approach
|
|
303A.04
|
|
A listed company must have a nominating/corporate governance
committee composed entirely of independent directors, with a
written charter that covers certain minimum specified duties.
Controlled companies are not required to comply with
this requirement.
|
|
We do not have a nominating committee. All but two of the
members of the Board of Directors are nominated by Valepar. As
a controlled company, we would not be required to comply with
the nominating/corporate governance committee requirements if we
were a U.S. domestic issuer. However, we do have a Governance
and Sustainability Committee, which is an advisory committee to
the Board of Directors. It has three members, two of whom are
directors. According to its charter, this committee is
responsible for:
|
|
|
|
|
evaluating and recommending improvements to
the effectiveness of our corporate governance practices and the
functioning of the Board of Directors;
|
|
|
|
|
recommending improvements to our code of
ethical conduct and management system in order to avoid
conflicts of interest between us and our shareholders or
management;
|
|
|
|
|
issuing reports on potential conflicts of
interest between us and our shareholders or management; and
|
|
|
|
|
reporting on policies relating to corporate
responsibility, such as environmental and social responsibility
|
|
|
|
|
Moreover, the committees charter requires at least one of
its members to be independent. For this purpose, an independent
member is a person who:
|
|
|
|
|
does not have any current relationship with us
other than being part of a committee, or being a shareholder of
the our company;
|
|
|
|
|
does not participate, directly or indirectly,
in the sales efforts or provision of services by Vale;
|
|
|
|
|
is not a representative of the controlling
shareholders;
|
|
|
|
|
has not been an employee of the controlling
shareholder or of entities affiliated with a controlling
shareholder;
|
|
|
|
|
has not been an executive officer of the
controlling shareholder.
|
303A.05
|
|
A listed company must have a compensation committee composed
entirely of independent directors, with a written charter that
covers certain minimum specified duties. Controlled
companies are not required to comply with this requirement.
|
|
As a controlled company, we would not be required to comply with
the compensation committee requirements if we were a U.S.
domestic issuer. However, we have an Executive Development
Committee, which is an advisory committee to the Board of
Directors. This committee has three members, all of whom are
directors. According to its charter, at least one of its members
is required to be independent (as defined above). This
committee is responsible for:
|
|
|
|
|
reporting on general human resources policies;
|
|
|
|
|
analyzing and reporting on the adequacy of
compensation levels for our executive officers;
|
158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NYSE corporate governance rule for
|
|
|
Section
|
|
U.S. domestic issuers
|
|
Our approach
|
|
|
|
|
|
proposing and updating guidelines for
evaluating the performance of our executive officers; and
|
|
|
|
|
reporting on policies relating to health and
safety.
|
303A.06
303A.07
|
|
A listed company must have an audit committee with a minimum of
three independent directors who satisfy the independence
requirements of Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act, with a
written charter that covers certain minimum specified duties.
|
|
In lieu of appointing an audit committee composed of independent
members of the Board of Directors, we have established a
permanent conselho fiscal, or fiscal council, in
accordance with the applicable provisions of Brazilian corporate
law, and provided the fiscal council with additional powers to
permit it to meet the requirements of Exchange Act Rule
10A-3(c)(3).
|
|
|
|
|
The Fiscal Council currently has four members. Under Brazilian
corporate law, which provides standards for the independence of
the Fiscal Council from us and our management, none of the
members of the Fiscal Council may be a member of the Board of
Directors or an executive officer. Management does not elect
any Fiscal Council member. One of the members of our Fiscal
Council meets the New York Stock Exchange independence
requirements that would apply to audit committee members in the
absence of our reliance on Exchange Act Rule 10A-3(c)(3).
|
|
|
|
|
The responsibilities of the Fiscal Council are set forth in its
charter. Our bylaws require the charter to give the Fiscal
Council, at a minimum, responsibility for the matters required
under Brazilian corporate law, as well as responsibility for:
|
|
|
|
|
establishing procedures for the receipt,
retention and treatment of complaints related to accounting,
controls and audit issues, as well as procedures for the
confidential, anonymous submission of concerns regarding such
matters;
|
|
|
|
|
recommending and assisting the Board of
Directors in the appointment, establishment of compensation and
dismissal of independent auditors;
|
|
|
|
|
pre-approving services to be rendered by the
independent auditors;
|
|
|
|
|
overseeing the work performed by the
independent auditors, with powers to suspend the payment of
compensation to the independent auditors; and
|
|
|
|
|
resolving disagreements between management and
the independent auditors regarding financial reporting.
|
303A.08
|
|
Shareholders must be given the opportunity to vote on all
equity-compensation plans and material revisions thereto, with
limited exemptions set forth in the NYSE rules.
|
|
Under Brazilian corporate law, shareholder pre-approval is
required for the adoption of any equity compensation plans.
|
303A.09
|
|
A listed company must adopt and disclose corporate governance
guidelines that cover certain minimum specified subjects.
|
|
We do not have formal corporate governance guidelines that
address all of the matters specified in the NYSE rules.
|
159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NYSE corporate governance rule for
|
|
|
Section
|
|
U.S. domestic issuers
|
|
Our approach
|
|
303A.10
|
|
A listed company must adopt and disclose a code of business
conduct and ethics for directors, officers and employees, and
promptly disclose any waivers of the code for directors or
executive officers.
|
|
We have adopted a formal code of ethical conduct, which applies
to our directors, officers and employees. We report each year
under Item 16B of our annual report on Form 20-F any waivers of
the code of ethical conduct granted for directors and executive
officers. Our code of ethical conduct has a scope that is
similar, but not identical, to that required for a U.S. domestic
company under the NYSE rules.
We also have a code of ethics that applies specifically to
employees in the corporate finance, investor relations and
accounting departments.
|
303A.12
|
|
Each listed company CEO must certify to the NYSE each year that
he or she is not aware of any violation by the company of NYSE
corporate governance listing standards.
|
|
Our CEO will promptly notify the NYSE in writing if any
executive officer becomes aware of any material non-compliance
with any applicable provisions of the NYSE corporate governance
rules.
|
PART III
|
|
Item 17.
|
Financial
statements
|
We have responded to Item 18 in lieu of responding to this
Item.
|
|
Item 18.
|
Financial
statements
|
Reference is made to pages F-1 to F-47.
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
Bylaws of Companhia Vale do Rio Doce, as amended August 30,
2007, incorporated by reference to our report on
Form 6-K
furnished to the SEC on September 4, 2007
|
|
8
|
|
|
List of subsidiaries
|
|
12
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Vale pursuant to
Rules 13a-14
and 15d-14 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
|
|
12
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Vale pursuant to
Rules 13a-14
and 15d-14 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
|
|
13
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of Vale, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
15
|
.1
|
|
Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers
|
|
15
|
.2
|
|
Consent of Mr. Colin Coxhead
|
|
15
|
.3
|
|
Consent of SRK Consulting
|
|
15
|
.4
|
|
Consent of MB Mining Consultants
|
|
15
|
.5
|
|
Consent of Hoskings Resource Management
|
|
15
|
.6
|
|
Consent of Snowden Mining Industry Consultants Pty Ltd
|
The amount of long-term debt securities of Vale or its
subsidiaries authorized under any individual outstanding
agreement does not exceed 10% of Vales total assets on a
consolidated basis. Vale hereby agrees to furnish the SEC, upon
its request, a copy of any instruments defining the rights of
holders of its long-term debt or of its subsidiaries for which
consolidated or unconsolidated financial statements are required
to be filed.
160
GLOSSARY
|
|
|
Alumina |
|
Aluminum oxide. It is the main component of bauxite, and
extracted from bauxite ore in a chemical refining process. It is
the principal raw material in the electro-chemical process from
which aluminum is produced. |
|
Anthracite |
|
The hardest coal type, which contains a high percentage of fixed
carbon and a low percentage of volatile matter. Anthracite is
the highest rank coal and it contains approximately 90% fixed
carbon, more than any other form of coal. Anthracite has a
semi-metallic luster and is capable of burning with little
smoke. Mainly used for metallurgical purposes. |
|
Austenitic stainless steel |
|
Steel that contains a significant amount of chromium and
sufficient nickel to stabilize the austenite microstructure,
giving to the steel good formability and ductibility and
improving its high temperature resistance. On average,
austenitic stainless steels usually contain 8-10% nickel. They
are used in a wide variety of applications, ranging from
consumer products to industrial process equipment, as well as
for power generation and transportation equipment, kitchen
appliances and many other applications where strength, corrosion
and high temperature resistance are required. |
|
Austenitic stainless steel ratio |
|
The ratio of nickel-based stainless steels (austenitic steels)
relative to all stainless steels produced. |
|
Bauxite |
|
A rock composed primarily of hydrated aluminum oxides. It is the
principal ore of alumina, the raw material from which aluminum
is made. |
|
Beneficiation |
|
A variety of processes whereby extracted ore from mining is
reduced to particles that can be separated into ore-mineral and
waste, the former suitable for further processing or direct use. |
|
BOF |
|
The vast majority of steel manufactured in the world is produced
using the basic oxygen furnace (BOF). Basic oxygen
steelmaking is a method of primary steelmaking in which
carbon-rich molten pig iron is made into steel. High purity
oxygen is blown through the molten bath to lower carbon,
silicon, manganese, and phosphorous content of the iron, while
various fluxes are used to reduce the sulfur and phosphorous
levels. |
|
Coal |
|
Coal is a black or brownish-black solid combustible substance
formed by the decomposition of vegetable matter without access
to air. The rank of coal, which includes anthracite, bituminous
coal (both are called hard coal), sub-bituminous coal, and
lignite, is based on fixed carbon, volatile matter, and heating
value. |
|
Cobalt |
|
Cobalt is a hard, lustrous, silver-gray metal found in ores, and
used in the preparation of magnetic, wear-resistant, and
high-strength alloys (particularly for jet engines and
turbines). Its compounds are also used in the production of
inks, paints, and varnishes. |
|
Coke |
|
Coal that has been processed in a coke oven, for use as a
reduction agent in blast furnaces and in foundries for the
purposes of transforming iron ore into pig iron. |
161
|
|
|
Concentration |
|
Physical, chemical or biological process to increase the grade
of the metal or mineral of interest. |
|
Copper |
|
A reddish brown metallic element. Copper is highly conductive,
both thermally and electrically. It is highly malleable and
ductile and is easily rolled into sheet and drawn into wire. |
|
Copper anode |
|
Copper anode is a metallic product of the converting stage of
smelting process that is cast into blocks and generally contains
99% copper grade, which requires further processing to produce
refined copper cathodes. |
|
Copper cathode |
|
Copper plate with purity higher than or equal to 99.9% that is
produced by an electrolytic process. |
|
Copper concentrate |
|
Material produced by concentration of copper minerals contained
in the copper ore. It is the raw material used in smelters to
produce copper metal. |
|
DR |
|
Direct reduction. Process that removes oxygen from iron ore by
using natural gas or coal. The resulting product has an iron
grade of
90-92%. |
|
DRI |
|
Direct reduced iron. Iron ore lumps or pellets converted by the
direct reduction process, used mainly as a scrap substitute in
electric arc furnace steelmaking. |
|
DWT |
|
Deadweight ton. The measurement unit of a vessels capacity
for cargo, fuel oil, stores and crew, measured in metric tons of
1,000 kg. A vessels total deadweight is the total weight
the vessel can carry when loaded to a particular load line. |
|
EAF |
|
The electric arc furnace (EAF) is the principle
furnace type for the electric production of steel. The primary
application of the EAF is for the re-melting of steel scrap;
however, EAFs can be charged with limited amounts of iron scrap,
pig iron and direct reduced iron. |
|
Electrowon copper cathode |
|
Refined copper cathode is a metallic product produced by an
electrochemical process in which copper is recovered by
dissolving copper anode in an electrolyte and plating it onto an
electrode. Electrowon copper cathodes generally contain 99.99%
copper grade. |
|
Embedded derivatives |
|
A financial instrument within a contractual arrangement such as
leases, purchase agreements, and guarantees. Its function is to
modify some or all of the cash flow that would otherwise be
required by the contract, such as caps, floors or collars. |
|
Fe unit |
|
A measure of the iron grade in the iron ore that is equivalent
to 1% iron grade in one metric ton of iron ore. |
|
Ferritic stainless steel |
|
Steel that contains significant amount of chromium, but does not
contain sufficient nickel and/or manganese to stabilize the
austenite microstructure. |
|
Ferroalloys |
|
Ferroalloys are alloys of iron that contain one or more other
chemical elements. These alloys are used to add these other |
162
|
|
|
|
|
elements into molten metal, usually in steelmaking. The
principal ferroalloys are those of manganese, silicon and
chromium. |
|
FOB |
|
Free on board. It indicates that the purchaser pays for
shipping, insurance and all the other costs associated with
transportation of the goods to their destination. |
|
Gold |
|
A precious metal sometimes found free in nature, but usually
found in conjunction with silver, quartz, calcite, lead,
tellurium, zinc or copper. It is the most malleable and ductile
metal, a good conductor of heat and electricity and unaffected
by air and most reagents. |
|
Grade |
|
The proportion of metal or mineral present in ore or any other
host material. |
|
Hard metallurgical coal |
|
Metallurgical coking coal with the required properties to
produce a stronger/harder metallurgical coke. |
|
Hematitinha |
|
A lump ore originated from our Southern System with the coarsest
particle size in the range of 6.35 mm to 19 mm in diameter,
varying from 75 to 90% between different mines and ores, that is
only sold in the Brazilian domestic market. |
|
HBI |
|
Hot briquetted iron. Direct reduced iron that has been processed
into briquettes. Because DRI may spontaneously combust during
transportation, HBI is preferred when the metallic material must
be stored or moved. |
|
Iridium |
|
A dense, hard, brittle, silvery-white transition metal of the
platinum family that occurs in natural alloys with platinum or
osmium. Iridium is used in high-strength alloys that can
withstand high temperatures, primarily in high-temperature
apparatus, electrical contacts, and as a hardening agent for
platinum. |
|
Iron ore pellets |
|
Agglomerated ultra-fine iron ore particles of a size and quality
suitable for particular iron making processes. Our iron ore
pellets range in size from 8 mm to 18 mm. |
|
Kaolin |
|
A fine white aluminum silicate clay derived from rock composed
chiefly of feldspar, which is used as a coating agent, filler,
extender and absorbent in the paper, paint, ceramics and other
industries. |
|
Lump ore |
|
Iron ore or manganese ore with the coarsest particle size in the
range of 6.35 mm to 50 mm in diameter, but varying slightly
between different mines and ores. |
|
Manganese |
|
A hard brittle metallic element found primarily in the minerals
pyrolusite, hausmannite and manganate. Manganese is essential to
the production of virtually all steels and is important in the
production of cast iron. |
|
Metallurgical coal |
|
A bituminous hard coal with a quality that allows the production
of coke. Normally used in coke ovens for metallurgical purposes. |
|
Methanol |
|
An alcohol fuel largely used in the production of chemical and
plastic compounds. |
163
|
|
|
Mineral deposit(s) or mineralized
material(s) |
|
A mineralized body that has been intersected by a sufficient
number of closely spaced drill holes and/or underground/surface
samples to support sufficient tonnage and grade of metal(s) or
mineral(s) of interest to warrant further
exploration-development work. |
|
Mineral resource |
|
A concentration or occurrence of minerals of economic interest
in such form and quantity that could justify an eventual
economic extraction. The location, quantity, grade, geological
characteristics and continuity of a mineral resource are known,
estimated or interpreted from specific geological evidence
through drill holes, trenches and/or outcrops. mineral resources
are sub-divided, in order of increasing geological confidence,
into Inferred, Indicated and Measured Resources. |
|
MK copper concentrate |
|
MK copper concentrate, or MK chalcocite copper concentrate, is
an intermediate copper product. The smelting process of combined
nickel-copper concentrate produces a nickel-copper matte
product, which is separated into two streams of intermediate
products, including MK chalcocite copper concentrate, for
further processing and refining. MK chalcocite copper
concentrate, which contains
70-75%
copper, is the feedstock material for copper smelter, producing
copper anodes. |
|
Nickel |
|
A silvery white metal that takes on a high polish. It is hard,
malleable, ductile, somewhat ferromagnetic, and a fair conductor
of heat and electricity. It belongs to the iron-cobalt group of
metals and is chiefly valuable for the alloys it forms, such as
stainless steel and other corrosion-resistant alloys. |
|
Nickel matte |
|
An intermediate smelter product that must be further refined to
obtain pure metal. |
|
Nickel pig iron |
|
A low-grade nickel product, made from lateritic ores, suitable
primarily for use in stainless steel production. Nickel pig iron
typically has a nickel grade of 1.5-6% if produced from blast
furnaces and
10-25% if
produced from electric furnaces, with iron accounting for most
of the balance. Nickel pig iron can also contain chrome,
manganese, and impurities such as silica, phosphorus, sulfur and
carbon. |
|
Ntk |
|
Net ton (the weight of the goods being transported excluding the
weight of the wagon) kilometer. |
|
Open-pit mining |
|
Method of extracting rock or minerals from the earth by their
removal from an open pit. Open-pit mines for extraction of ore
are used when deposits of commercially useful minerals or rock
are found near the surface; that is, where the overburden
(surface material covering the valuable deposit) is relatively
thin or the material of interest is structurally unsuitable for
underground mining. |
|
Oxides |
|
Compounds of oxygen with another element. For example, magnetite
is an oxide mineral formed by the chemical union of iron with
oxygen. |
164
|
|
|
Palladium |
|
A silver-white metal that is ductile and malleable, used
primarily in automobile-emissions control devices, jewelry,
electrical and chemical applications. |
|
Pellet feed fines |
|
Ultra-fine iron ore (less than 0.15 mm) generated by mining
and grinding. This material is aggregated into iron ore pellets
through an agglomeration process. |
|
Pelletizing |
|
Iron ore pelletizing is a process of agglomeration of
ultra-fines produced in iron ore exploitation and concentration
steps. The three basic stages of the process are: (i) ore
preparation (to get the correct fineness); (ii) mixing and
balling (additive mixing and ball formation); and
(iii) firing (to get ceramic bonding and strength). |
|
Phosphate |
|
A phosphorous compound, which occurs in natural ores and is used
as a raw material for primary production of fertilizers, animal
feeds and detergents. |
|
Pig iron |
|
Product of smelting iron ore usually with coke and limestone in
a blast furnace. |
|
Platinum |
|
A dense, precious, grey-white transition metal that is ductile
and malleable and occurs in some nickel and copper ores.
Platinum is resistant to corrosion and is used in jewelry,
laboratory equipment, electrical contacts, dentistry,
automobile-emissions control devices, flat panel TVs and hard
disk drives. |
|
Platinum-group metals (PGMs) |
|
Consist of platinum, palladium, rhodium, ruthenium, osmium and
iridium, of which osmium has no industrial application and no
economic value, while platinum and palladium have the greatest
economic value. |
|
Potash |
|
A potassium chloride compound, chiefly KCL, used as simple
fertilizer and in the production of mixture fertilizer. |
|
Precious metals |
|
Metals valued for their color, malleability, and rarity, with a
high economic value driven not only by their practical
industrial use, but also by their role as investments. The
widely-traded precious metals are gold, silver, platinum and
palladium. |
|
Primary aluminum |
|
White metal that is obtained in the electro-chemical process of
reduction of the aluminum oxide. |
|
Probable (indicated) reserves |
|
Reserves for which quantity and grade and/or quality are
computed form information similar to that used for proven
(measured) reserves, but the sites for inspection, sampling and
measurement are farther apart or are otherwise less adequately
spaced. The degree of assurance, although lower than that for
proven (measured) reserves, is high enough to assume continuity
between points of observation. |
|
Proven (measured) reserves |
|
Reserves for which (a) quantity is computed from dimensions
revealed in outcrops, trenches, working or drill holes; grade
and/or quality are computed from the results of detailed
sampling and (b) the sites for inspection, sampling and
measurement are spaced so closely and the geologic character is
so well defined that size, shape, depth and mineral content of
reserves are well-established. |
165
|
|
|
Pulverized coal injection (PCI) |
|
Type of coal with specific properties ideal for direct injection
via the tuyeres of blast furnaces. This type of coal does not
require any processing or coke making, and can be directly
injected into the blast furnaces, replacing lump cokes to be
charged from the top of the blast furnaces. |
|
Reserves |
|
The part of a mineral deposit that could be economically and
legally extracted or produced at the time of the reserve
determination. |
|
Rhodium |
|
A hard, silvery-white, durable metal that has a high reflectance
and is primarily used in combination with platinum for
automobile-emission control devices and as an alloying agent for
hardening platinum. |
|
Run-of-mine (ROM) |
|
Ore in its natural (unprocessed) state, as mined, without having
been crushed. |
|
Ruthenium |
|
A hard, white metal that can harden platinum and palladium used
to make severe wear-resistant electrical contacts and in other
applications in the electronics industry. |
|
Secondary or scrap nickel |
|
Stainless steel or other nickel containing scrap. |
|
Seaborne market |
|
Comprises the total ore trade between countries using ocean bulk
vessels. |
|
Silver |
|
A ductile and malleable metal used in photography, coins and
medal fabrication, and in industrial applications. |
|
Sinter feed (also known as fines) |
|
Iron ore fines with particles in the range of 0.15 mm to 6.35 mm
in diameter. Suitable for sintering. |
|
Sintering |
|
The agglomeration of sinter feed, binder and other materials,
into a coherent mass by heating without melting, to be used as
metallic charge into a blast furnace. |
|
Slabs |
|
The most common type of semi-finished steel. Traditional slabs
measure 10 inches thick and
30-85 inches
wide (and average approximately 20 feet long), while the
output of the recently developed thin slab casters
is approximately two inches thick. Subsequent to casting, slabs
are sent to the hot-strip mill to be rolled into coiled sheet
and plate products. |
|
Stainless steel |
|
Alloy steel containing at least 10% chromium and with superior
corrosion resistance. It may also contain other elements such as
nickel, manganese, niobium, titanium, molybdenum, copper, in
order to improve mechanical, thermal properties and service
life. It is primarily classified as austenitic (200 and 300
series), ferritic (400 series), martensitic, duplex or
precipitation hardening grades. |
|
Stainless steel scrap ratio |
|
The ratio of secondary nickel units (either in the form of
nickel-bearing, stainless steel scrap, or in alloy steel,
foundry and nickel-based alloy scrap) relative to all nickel
units consumed in the manufacture of new stainless steel. |
|
Thermal coal |
|
A type of coal that is suitable for energy generation in thermal
power stations. |
|
Troy ounce |
|
One troy ounce equals 31.103 grams. |
|
Underground mining |
|
Mineral exploitation in which extraction is carried out beneath
the earths surface. |
166
SIGNATURES
The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the
requirements for filing on
Form 20-F
and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to
sign this annual report on its behalf.
COMPANHIA VALE DO RIO DOCE
Name: Roger Agnelli
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Fabio
de Oliveira Barbosa
|
Name: Fabio de Oliveira Barbosa
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
Date: April 28, 2009
167
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Rua
da Candelária 65 11°-15°
20091-020
Rio de Janeiro, RJ Brasil
Caixa
Postal 949
Telefone
(21) 3232-6112
Fax
(21) 2516-6319
www.pwc.com.br
Report of
Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm
To
the Board of Directors and Stockholders
Companhia
Vale de Rio Doce
In our opinion, the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related
consolidated statements of income, of cash flows and of changes
in stockholders equity present fairly, in all material
respects, the financial position of Companhia Vale do Rio Doce
and its subsidiaries at December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the
results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 2008 in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company
maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on
criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The
Companys management is responsible for these financial
statements, for maintaining effective internal control over
financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting, included in the
accompanying Managements Report on internal control over
financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express opinions
on these financial statements and on the Companys internal
control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement and whether effective internal
control over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audits of the financial statements included
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, and evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial
reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a
material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design
and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the
assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinions.
A companys
internal control over financial reporting is a process designed
to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles. A companys internal control over
financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that
(i) pertain to the maintenance, of records that, in
reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company;
(ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are
recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its
inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting
may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of
any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to
the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes
in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the
policies or procedures may deteriorate.
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Auditores
Independentes
Rio
de Janeiro, Brazil
February 19,
2009
F-2
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
Expressed in
millions of United States Dollars
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
10,331
|
|
|
|
1,046
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
2,308
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related parties
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
281
|
|
Unrelated parties
|
|
|
3,067
|
|
|
|
3,671
|
|
Loans and advances to related parties
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
3,896
|
|
|
|
3,859
|
|
Deferred income tax
|
|
|
583
|
|
|
|
603
|
|
Recoverable taxes
|
|
|
1,993
|
|
|
|
1,159
|
|
Other
|
|
|
870
|
|
|
|
697
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,238
|
|
|
|
11,380
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net, and intangible assets
|
|
|
49,329
|
|
|
|
54,625
|
|
Investments in affiliated companies, joint ventures and other
investments
|
|
|
2,408
|
|
|
|
2,922
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill on acquisition of subsidiaries
|
|
|
1,898
|
|
|
|
3,791
|
|
Loans and advances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Unrelated parties
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
Prepaid pension cost
|
|
|
622
|
|
|
|
1,009
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
Judicial deposits
|
|
|
1,141
|
|
|
|
1,124
|
|
Advances to suppliers - energy
|
|
|
408
|
|
|
|
574
|
|
Recoverable taxes
|
|
|
394
|
|
|
|
199
|
|
Unrealized gains on derivative instruments
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
673
|
|
Other
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,956
|
|
|
|
7,790
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
|
79,931
|
|
|
|
76,717
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-3
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
Expressed in millions of United
States Dollars
(Except number of shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Continued)
|
|
|
|
As of
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suppliers
|
|
|
2,261
|
|
|
|
2,430
|
|
Payroll and related charges
|
|
|
591
|
|
|
|
734
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
633
|
|
|
|
1,249
|
|
Short-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
167
|
|
Loans from related parties
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
502
|
|
|
|
1,198
|
|
Taxes payable and royalties
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
322
|
|
Employees post-retirement benefits
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
Railway sub-concession agreement payable
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
Unrealized losses on derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
346
|
|
Provisions for asset retirement obligations
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
Minimum mandatory dividends payable
|
|
|
2,068
|
|
|
|
2,683
|
|
Other
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
543
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,237
|
|
|
|
10,083
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employees post-retirement benefits
|
|
|
1,485
|
|
|
|
2,204
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
17,535
|
|
|
|
17,608
|
|
Provisions for contingencies (Note 20 (b))
|
|
|
1,685
|
|
|
|
2,453
|
|
Unrealized losses on derivative instruments
|
|
|
573
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Deferred income tax
|
|
|
4,005
|
|
|
|
5,725
|
|
Provisions for asset retirement obligations
|
|
|
839
|
|
|
|
911
|
|
Railway sub-concession agreement payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1,525
|
|
|
|
1,687
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,647
|
|
|
|
30,803
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
2,491
|
|
|
|
2,555
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 20)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred class A stock - 7,200,000,000 no-par-value
shares authorized and 2,108,579,618 (2007 - 1,919,516,400)
issued
|
|
|
9,727
|
|
|
|
4,953
|
|
Common stock - 3,600,000,000 no-par-value shares authorized
and 3,256,724,482
(2007 - 2,999,797,716) issued
|
|
|
15,262
|
|
|
|
7,742
|
|
Treasury stock - 76,854,304 (2007 - 30,341,144)
preferred and 74,937,899 (2007 - 56,582,040) common shares
|
|
|
(1,141
|
)
|
|
|
(389
|
)
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
393
|
|
|
|
498
|
|
Mandatorily convertible notes - common shares
|
|
|
1,288
|
|
|
|
1,288
|
|
Mandatorily convertible notes - preferred shares
|
|
|
581
|
|
|
|
581
|
|
Other cumulative comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
(11,510
|
)
|
|
|
1,655
|
|
Undistributed retained earnings
|
|
|
18,340
|
|
|
|
15,317
|
|
Unappropriated retained earnings
|
|
|
9,616
|
|
|
|
1,631
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,556
|
|
|
|
33,276
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
|
79,931
|
|
|
|
76,717
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying
notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
F-4
Consolidated
Statements of Income
Expressed in millions of United
States Dollars
(Except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Operating revenues, net of discounts, returns and allowances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of ores and metals
|
|
|
32,779
|
|
|
|
28,441
|
|
|
|
16,511
|
|
Aluminum products
|
|
|
3,042
|
|
|
|
2,722
|
|
|
|
2,381
|
|
Revenues from logistic services
|
|
|
1,607
|
|
|
|
1,525
|
|
|
|
1,376
|
|
Other products and services
|
|
|
1,081
|
|
|
|
427
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,509
|
|
|
|
33,115
|
|
|
|
20,363
|
|
Taxes on revenues
|
|
|
(1,083
|
)
|
|
|
(873
|
)
|
|
|
(712
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating revenues
|
|
|
37,426
|
|
|
|
32,242
|
|
|
|
19,651
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of ores and metals sold
|
|
|
(14,055
|
)
|
|
|
(13,628
|
)
|
|
|
(7,946
|
)
|
Cost of aluminum products
|
|
|
(2,267
|
)
|
|
|
(1,705
|
)
|
|
|
(1,355
|
)
|
Cost of logistic services
|
|
|
(930
|
)
|
|
|
(853
|
)
|
|
|
(777
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(389
|
)
|
|
|
(277
|
)
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,641
|
)
|
|
|
(16,463
|
)
|
|
|
(10,147
|
)
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(1,748
|
)
|
|
|
(1,245
|
)
|
|
|
(816
|
)
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
(1,085
|
)
|
|
|
(733
|
)
|
|
|
(481
|
)
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
(950
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(1,254
|
)
|
|
|
(607
|
)
|
|
|
(570
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,678
|
)
|
|
|
(19,048
|
)
|
|
|
(12,014
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
14,748
|
|
|
|
13,194
|
|
|
|
7,637
|
|
Non-operating income (expenses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial income
|
|
|
602
|
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
327
|
|
Financial expenses
|
|
|
(1,765
|
)
|
|
|
(2,517
|
)
|
|
|
(1,222
|
)
|
Gains (losses) on derivatives, net
|
|
|
(812
|
)
|
|
|
931
|
|
|
|
(116
|
)
|
Foreign exchange and indexation gains (losses), net
|
|
|
364
|
|
|
|
2,553
|
|
|
|
529
|
|
Gain on sale of investments
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
777
|
|
|
|
674
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,531
|
)
|
|
|
2,039
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes, equity results and minority interests
|
|
|
13,217
|
|
|
|
15,233
|
|
|
|
7,829
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
(1,338
|
)
|
|
|
(3,901
|
)
|
|
|
(1,134
|
)
|
Deferred
|
|
|
803
|
|
|
|
700
|
|
|
|
(298
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(535
|
)
|
|
|
(3,201
|
)
|
|
|
(1,432
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in results of affiliates, joint ventures and other
investments
|
|
|
794
|
|
|
|
595
|
|
|
|
710
|
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
(258
|
)
|
|
|
(802
|
)
|
|
|
(579
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
13,218
|
|
|
|
11,825
|
|
|
|
6,528
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per preferred share
|
|
|
2.58
|
|
|
|
2.41
|
|
|
|
1.35
|
|
Earnings per common share
|
|
|
2.58
|
|
|
|
2.41
|
|
|
|
1.35
|
|
Earnings per preferred share linked to convertible note(*)
|
|
|
4.09
|
|
|
|
3.30
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share linked to convertible note(*)
|
|
|
4.29
|
|
|
|
3.51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*)
|
|
Basic
earnings per share only, as dilution assumes conversion.
|
The accompanying
notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
F-5
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
Expressed in
millions of United States Dollars
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
13,218
|
|
|
|
11,825
|
|
|
|
6,528
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash from operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
2,807
|
|
|
|
2,186
|
|
|
|
997
|
|
Dividends received
|
|
|
513
|
|
|
|
394
|
|
|
|
516
|
|
Equity in results of affiliates, joint ventures and other
investments
|
|
|
(794
|
)
|
|
|
(595
|
)
|
|
|
(710
|
)
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(803
|
)
|
|
|
(700
|
)
|
|
|
298
|
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
950
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
376
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
Gain on sale of investments
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
(777
|
)
|
|
|
(674
|
)
|
Foreign exchange and indexation losses (gains), net
|
|
|
451
|
|
|
|
(2,827
|
)
|
|
|
(917
|
)
|
Unrealized derivative losses (gains), net
|
|
|
812
|
|
|
|
(917
|
)
|
|
|
116
|
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
|
802
|
|
|
|
579
|
|
Unrealized interest (income) expense, net
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
Others
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
(93
|
)
|
Decrease (increase) in assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(466
|
)
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
|
(438
|
)
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(467
|
)
|
|
|
(343
|
)
|
|
|
859
|
|
Others
|
|
|
(242
|
)
|
|
|
(292
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
Increase (decrease) in liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suppliers
|
|
|
703
|
|
|
|
998
|
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
Payroll and related charges
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
(86
|
)
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(140
|
)
|
|
|
393
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
Others
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
17,114
|
|
|
|
11,012
|
|
|
|
7,232
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short term investments
|
|
|
(2,308
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and advances receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan proceeds
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
Repayments
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Others
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
Judicial deposits
|
|
|
(133
|
)
|
|
|
(125
|
)
|
|
|
(78
|
)
|
Investments
|
|
|
(128
|
)
|
|
|
(324
|
)
|
|
|
(107
|
)
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(8,972
|
)
|
|
|
(6,651
|
)
|
|
|
(4,431
|
)
|
Proceeds from disposal of investments
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
1,042
|
|
|
|
837
|
|
Proceeds from disposals of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
Acquisition of subsidiaries, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,926
|
)
|
|
|
(13,201
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(11,401
|
)
|
|
|
(9,006
|
)
|
|
|
(16,954
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt, additions
|
|
|
1,076
|
|
|
|
4,483
|
|
|
|
4,912
|
|
Short-term debt, repayments
|
|
|
(1,311
|
)
|
|
|
(5,040
|
)
|
|
|
(4,233
|
)
|
Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan proceeds
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
259
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Repayments
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(273
|
)
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
Issuances of long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Others
|
|
|
1,890
|
|
|
|
7,212
|
|
|
|
21,993
|
|
Repayments of long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Others
|
|
|
(1,130
|
)
|
|
|
(11,130
|
)
|
|
|
(7,635
|
)
|
Treasury stock
|
|
|
(752
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(301
|
)
|
Mandatorily convertible notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,869
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital increase
|
|
|
12,190
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends and interest attributed to stockholders
|
|
|
(2,850
|
)
|
|
|
(1,875
|
)
|
|
|
(1,300
|
)
|
Dividends to minority interest
|
|
|
(143
|
)
|
|
|
(714
|
)
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
9,004
|
|
|
|
(5,209
|
)
|
|
|
13,345
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
14,717
|
|
|
|
(3,203
|
)
|
|
|
3,623
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(5,432
|
)
|
|
|
(199
|
)
|
|
|
(216
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
1,046
|
|
|
|
4,448
|
|
|
|
1,041
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
|
10,331
|
|
|
|
1,046
|
|
|
|
4,448
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on short-term debt
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
Interest on long-term debt
|
|
|
(1,255
|
)
|
|
|
(1,289
|
)
|
|
|
(565
|
)
|
Income tax
|
|
|
(2,867
|
)
|
|
|
(3,284
|
)
|
|
|
(586
|
)
|
Non-cash transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest capitalized
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
Issuance of preferred stock for the acquisition of Caemi, net of
cash acquired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,552
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.
F-6
Consolidated
Statements of Changes in Stockholders Equity
Expressed in millions of
United States Dollars
(except number of shares and per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Preferred class A stock (including twelve special shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of the period
|
|
|
4,953
|
|
|
|
4,702
|
|
|
|
2,150
|
|
Capital increase
|
|
|
4,774
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,552
|
|
Transfer from undistributed retained earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of the period
|
|
|
9,727
|
|
|
|
4,953
|
|
|
|
4,702
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of the period
|
|
|
7,742
|
|
|
|
3,806
|
|
|
|
3,806
|
|
Capital increase
|
|
|
7,520
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfer from undistributed retained earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,936
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of the period
|
|
|
15,262
|
|
|
|
7,742
|
|
|
|
3,806
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of the period
|
|
|
(389
|
)
|
|
|
(389
|
)
|
|
|
(301
|
)
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
(752
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of the period
|
|
|
(1,141
|
)
|
|
|
(389
|
)
|
|
|
(389
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning and end of the period
|
|
|
498
|
|
|
|
498
|
|
|
|
498
|
|
Change in the period
|
|
|
(105
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of the period
|
|
|
393
|
|
|
|
498
|
|
|
|
498
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mandatorily convertible notes - common shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning and end of the period
|
|
|
1,288
|
|
|
|
1,288
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mandatorily convertible notes - preferred shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning and end of the period
|
|
|
581
|
|
|
|
581
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other cumulative comprehensive income (deficit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of the period
|
|
|
1,340
|
|
|
|
(1,628
|
)
|
|
|
(2,856
|
)
|
Change in the period
|
|
|
(12,833
|
)
|
|
|
2,968
|
|
|
|
1,228
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of the period
|
|
|
(11,493
|
)
|
|
|
1,340
|
|
|
|
(1,628
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) - available-for-sale securities, net
of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of the period
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
Change in the period
|
|
|
(194
|
)
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of the period
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Surplus (deficit) accrued pension plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of the period
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
353
|
|
|
|
460
|
|
Change in the period
|
|
|
(109
|
)
|
|
|
(278
|
)
|
|
|
(107
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of the period
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
353
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow hedge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of the period
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in the period
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of the period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other cumulative comprehensive income (deficit)
|
|
|
(11,510
|
)
|
|
|
1,655
|
|
|
|
(1,004
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undistributed retained earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of the period
|
|
|
15,317
|
|
|
|
9,555
|
|
|
|
4,357
|
|
Transfer from/to unappropriated retained earnings
|
|
|
3,023
|
|
|
|
9,949
|
|
|
|
5,198
|
|
Capitalized earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,187
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of the period
|
|
|
18,340
|
|
|
|
15,317
|
|
|
|
9,555
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unappropriated retained earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of the period
|
|
|
1,631
|
|
|
|
2,505
|
|
|
|
3,983
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
13,218
|
|
|
|
11,825
|
|
|
|
6,528
|
|
Interest on mandatorily convertible debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred class A stock
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends and interest attributed to stockholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred class A stock
|
|
|
(806
|
)
|
|
|
(1,049
|
)
|
|
|
(1,098
|
)
|
Common stock
|
|
|
(1,262
|
)
|
|
|
(1,634
|
)
|
|
|
(1,710
|
)
|
Appropriation from/to undistributed retained earnings
|
|
|
(3,023
|
)
|
|
|
(9,949
|
)
|
|
|
(5,198
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of the period
|
|
|
9,616
|
|
|
|
1,631
|
|
|
|
2,505
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
42,556
|
|
|
|
33,276
|
|
|
|
19,673
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred class A stock (including twelve special shares)
|
|
|
2,108,579,618
|
|
|
|
1,919,516,400
|
|
|
|
1,919,516,400
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
3,256,724,482
|
|
|
|
2,999,797,716
|
|
|
|
2,999,797,716
|
|
Buy-backs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of the period
|
|
|
(86,923,184
|
)
|
|
|
(86,927,072
|
)
|
|
|
(56,627,872
|
)
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
(64,869,259
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,299,200
|
)
|
Sales
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
3,888
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of the period
|
|
|
(151,792,203
|
)
|
|
|
(86,923,184
|
)
|
|
|
(86,927,072
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,213,511,897
|
|
|
|
4,832,390,932
|
|
|
|
4,832,387,044
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.
F-7
Notes
to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Expressed in
millions of United States Dollars, unless otherwise
stated
1 The
Company and its operation
Companhia Vale do
Rio Doce (Vale, the Company or
we) is a limited liability company incorporated in
Brazil. Operations are carried out through Vale and our
subsidiary companies, joint ventures and affiliates, and mainly
consist of mining, non-ferrous metal production, logistics and
steel activities.
At December 31,
2008, our principal consolidated operating subsidiaries are the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
% voting
|
|
|
Head office
|
|
|
Subsidiary
|
|
ownership
|
|
|
capital
|
|
|
location
|
|
Principal
activity
|
|
Alumina do Norte do Brasil S.A. (Alunorte)
|
|
|
57.03
|
|
|
|
59.02
|
|
|
Brazil
|
|
Alumina
|
Alumínio Brasileiro S.A. (Albras)
|
|
|
51.00
|
|
|
|
51.00
|
|
|
Brazil
|
|
Aluminum
|
CADAM S.A. (CADAM)
|
|
|
61.48
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
Brazil
|
|
Kaolin
|
CVRD Overseas Ltd.
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
Cayman Islands
|
|
Trading
|
Ferrovia Centro-Atlântica S.A.
|
|
|
99.99
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
Brazil
|
|
Logistics
|
Minerações Brasileiras Reunidas S.A. (MBR)
|
|
|
92.99
|
|
|
|
92.99
|
|
|
Brazil
|
|
Iron ore
|
Pará Pigmentos S.A. (PPSA)
|
|
|
86.17
|
|
|
|
85.57
|
|
|
Brazil
|
|
Kaolin
|
PT International Nickel Indonesia Tbk (PT Inco)
|
|
|
61.16
|
|
|
|
61.16
|
|
|
Indonesia
|
|
Nickel
|
Vale Manganês S.A. (formely Rio Doce
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manganese and
|
Manganês S.A.)
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
Brazil
|
|
Ferroalloys
|
Vale Manganèse France (formely Rio Doce
Manganèse Europe - RDME)
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
France
|
|
Ferroalloys
|
Rio Doce Manganese Norway (RDMN)
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
Norway
|
|
Ferroalloys
|
Vale Australia Pty Ltd.
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
Australia
|
|
Coal
|
Vale Inco Limited
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
Canada
|
|
Nickel
|
Vale International S.A. (formerly CVRD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International S.A.)
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
Switzerland
|
|
Trading
|
Valesul Alumínio S.A.
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
Brazil
|
|
Aluminum
|
2 Basis
of consolidation
All majority-owned
subsidiaries in which we have both share and management control
are consolidated. All significant intercompany accounts and
transactions are eliminated. Our variable interest entities in
which we are the primary beneficiary are consolidated.
Investments in unconsolidated affiliates and joint ventures are
accounted for under the equity method (Note 12).
We evaluate the
carrying value of our equity accounted investments in relation
to publicly quoted market prices when available. If the quoted
market price is below book value, and such decline is considered
other than temporary, we write-down our equity investments to
quoted market value.
We define joint
ventures as businesses in which we and a small group of other
partners each participate actively in the overall entity
management, based on a shareholders agreement. We define
affiliates as businesses in which we participate as a minority
stockholder but with significant influence over the operating
and financial policies of the investee.
Our participation in
hydroelectric projects are made via consortium contracts under
which we have undivided interests in the assets and are liable
for our proportionate share of liabilities and expenses, which
are based on our proportionate share of power output. We do not
have joint liability for any obligations. No separate legal or
tax status is granted to consortia under Brazilian law.
Accordingly, we recognize our proportionate share of costs and
our undivided interest in assets relating to hydroelectric
projects (Note 11).
F-8
3 Summary
of significant accounting policies
The preparation of
financial statements requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts
of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Estimates
are used for, but not limited to, the selection of useful lives
of property, plant and equipment, impairment, provisions
necessary for contingent liabilities, fair values assigned to
assets and liabilities acquired in business combinations, income
tax valuation allowances, employee post-retirement benefits and
other similar evaluations. Actual results could differ from
those estimates.
|
|
(a)
|
Basis of
presentation
|
We have prepared our
consolidated financial statements in accordance with United
States generally accepted accounting principles
(U.S. GAAP), which differ in certain respects
from the accounting practices adopted in Brazil (Brazilian
GAAP) which are the basis for our statutory financial
statements.
In December 2007,
significant modifications were made to Brazilian GAAP as part of
a convergence project with International Financial Reporting
Standards (IFRS). Such changes became effective for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, whereas other
changes will be introduced subsequently.
The Brazilian Real
is the parent Companys functional currency. We have
selected the U.S. dollar as our reporting currency. The
financial statements have been translated in accordance with the
criteria set forth in Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. (SFAS) 52 Foreign
Currency Translation.
All assets and
liabilities have been translated to U.S. dollars at the
closing rate of exchange at each balance sheet date (or, if
unavailable, the first available exchange rate). All statement
of income accounts have been translated to U.S. dollars at
the average exchange rates prevailing during the respective
periods. Capital accounts are recorded at historical exchange
rates. Translation gains and losses are recorded in the
Cumulative Translation Adjustments account (CTA) in
stockholders equity. The results of operations and
financial position of our entities that have a functional
currency other than the U.S. dollar have been translated in
accordance with SFAS 52.
The exchange rates
used to translate the assets and liabilities of the Brazilian
operations at December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007,
were R$2.3370 and R$1.7713, respectively.
The net transaction
gain (loss) included in our statement of income (Foreign
exchange and indexation gains (losses), net) was
US$(1,011), US$1,639 and US$452 for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
|
|
(b)
|
Cash equivalents
and short-tem investment
|
Cash flows from
overnight investments and fundings are reported net. Short-term
investments that have a ready market and original maturities of
90 days or less are classified as Cash
equivalents. The remaining investments, with longer
maturities are stated at fair value and presented as
Short-term investments.
Assets and
liabilities that are realizable or due more than 12 months
after the balance sheet date are classified as long-term.
Inventory is
recorded at the average cost of purchase or production, reduced
to market value (net realizable value less a reasonable margin)
when lower.
F-9
We classify proven
and probable reserve quantities attributable to stockpiled
inventories as inventories and account for them as processed
when they are removed from the mine. These reserve quantities
are not included in the total proven and probable reserve
quantities used in the units of production, depreciation,
depletion and amortization calculations.
We periodically
assess our inventories to identify obsolete or slow-moving
inventories, and if needed we recognize definitive allowances
for them.
|
|
(e)
|
Removal of waste
materials to access mineral deposits
|
Stripping costs (the
costs associated with the removal of overburden and other waste
materials) incurred during the development of a mine, before
production commences, are capitalized as part of the depreciable
cost of developing the property. Such costs are subsequently
amortized over the useful life of the mine based on proven and
probable reserves.
Post-production
stripping costs are included in the cost of the inventory
produced (that is extracted), at each mine individually during
the period that the stripping cost is incurred.
|
|
(f)
|
Property, plant
and equipment and intangible assets
|
Property, plant and
equipment are recorded at cost, including interest cost incurred
during the construction of major new facilities. We compute
depreciation on the straight-line basis at annual average rates
which take into consideration the useful lives of the assets, as
follows: 3.03% for railroads, 3.65% for buildings, 3.78% for
installations and 7.30% for other equipment. Expenditures for
maintenance and repairs are charged to operating costs and
expenses as incurred.
We capitalize the
costs of developing major new ore bodies or expanding the
capacity of operating mines and amortize these to operations on
the unit-of-production method based on the total probable and
proven quantity of ore to be recovered. Exploration costs are
expensed. Once the economic viability of mining activities is
established, subsequent development costs are capitalized.
Separately acquired
intangible assets are shown at historical cost. Intangible
assets acquired in a business combination are recognized at fair
value at the acquisition date. All our intangible assets have
definite useful lives and are carried at cost less accumulated
amortization, which is calculated using the straight-line method
over their estimated useful lives.
|
|
(g)
|
Business
combinations
|
We adopt
SFAS 141 Business Combinations to record
acquisitions of interests in other companies. This
purchase method requires that we reasonably
determine the fair value of the identifiable tangible and
intangible assets and liabilities of acquired companies and
segregate goodwill as an intangible asset.
We assign goodwill
to reporting units and test each reporting units goodwill
for impairment at least annually, and whenever circumstance
indicating that recognized goodwill may not be fully recovered
are identified. We perform the annual goodwill impairment tests
during the last quarter of the year using September 30 as our
base date.
Goodwill is reviewed
for impairment utilizing a two-step process. In the first step,
we compare a reporting units fair value with its carrying
amount to identify any potential goodwill impairment loss. If
the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds the units
fair value, based on a discounted cash flow analysis, we carry
out the second step of the impairment test, measuring and
recording the amount, if any, of the units goodwill
impairment loss.
F-10
|
|
(h)
|
Impairment of
long-lived assets
|
All long-lived
assets, are tested to determine if they are recoverable from
operating earnings on an undiscounted cash flow basis over their
useful lives whenever events or changes in circumstance indicate
that the carrying value may not be recoverable.
When we determine
that the carrying value of long-lived assets and definite-life
intangible assets may not be recoverable, we measure any
impairment loss based on a projected discounted cash flow method
using a discount rate determined to be commensurate with the
risk inherent in our current business model.
|
|
(i)
|
Available-for-sale
equity securities
|
Equity securities
classified as available-for-sale are recorded
pursuant to SFAS 115 Accounting for Certain
Investments in Debt and Equity Securities. Accordingly, we
classify unrealized holding gains and losses, net of taxes, as a
separate component of stockholders equity until realized.
The liability for
future compensation for employee vacations is fully accrued as
earned.
|
|
(k)
|
Derivatives and
hedging activities
|
We apply
SFAS 133 Accounting for Derivative Financial
Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended. This
standard requires that we recognize all derivative financial
instruments as either assets or liabilities on our balance sheet
and measure such instruments at fair value. Changes in the fair
value of derivatives are recorded in each period in current
earnings or in other comprehensive income, in the latter case
depending on whether a transaction is designated as an effective
hedge and has been effective during the period.
|
|
(l)
|
Asset retirement
obligations
|
Our retirement
obligations consist primarily of estimated closure costs, the
initial measurement of which is recognized as a liability
discounted to present value and subsequently accreted through
earnings. An asset retirement cost equal to the initial
liability is capitalized as part of the related assets
carrying value and depreciated over the assets useful life.
|
|
(m)
|
Revenues and
expenses
|
Revenues are
recognized when title is transferred to the customer or services
are rendered. Revenue from exported products is recognized when
such products are loaded on board the ship. Revenue from
products sold in the domestic market is recognized when delivery
is made to the customer. Revenue from logistic services is
recognized when the service order has been fulfilled. Expenses
and costs are recognized on the accrual basis.
The deferred tax
effects of tax loss carryforwards and temporary differences are
recognized pursuant to SFAS 109 Accounting for Income
Taxes. A valuation allowance is made when we believe that
it is more likely than not that tax assets will not be fully
recovered in the future.
Earnings per share
are computed by dividing net income by the weighted average
number of common and preferred shares outstanding during the
period.
|
|
(p)
|
Interest
attributed to stockholders equity (dividend)
|
Brazilian
corporations are permitted to distribute interest attributable
to stockholders equity. The calculation is based on the
stockholders equity amounts as stated in the statutory
accounting
F-11
records and the
interest rate applied may not exceed the long-term interest rate
(TJLP) determined by the Brazilian Central Bank. Also, such
interest may not exceed 50% of net income for the year nor 50%
of retained earnings plus revenue reserves as determined by
Brazilian GAAP.
As the notional
interest charge is tax deductible in Brazil, the benefit to us,
as opposed to making a dividend payment, is a reduction in our
income tax charge. Income tax of 15% is withheld on behalf of
the stockholders relative to the interest distribution. Under
Brazilian law, interest attributed to stockholders equity
is considered as part of the annual minimum mandatory dividend
(Note 16). This notional interest distribution is treated
for accounting purposes as a deduction from stockholders
equity in a manner similar to a dividend and the tax credit
recorded in income.
We present
comprehensive income as part of the Statement of Changes in
Stockholders Equity, in compliance with SFAS 130
Reporting Comprehensive Income, net of taxes.
|
|
(r)
|
Pension and other
post-retirement benefits
|
We sponsor private
pension and other post-retirement benefits for our employees
which are actuarially determined and recognized as an asset or
liability or both depending on the funded or unfunded status of
each plan in accordance with SFAS 158 Employees
Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Post-retirement
Plans. The cost of our defined benefit and prior service
costs or credits that arise during the period and are not
components of net periodic benefit costs are recorded in other
cumulative comprehensive income (deficit).
4 Recently-issued
accounting pronouncements
In January 2009, the
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued
EITF 99-20-1
Amendments to the Impairment Guidance of EITF Issue No.
99-20,
to achieve more consistent determination of whether an
other-than-temporary impairment has occurred. It is effective
for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim
periods beginning after December 15, 2008. We are currently
studying the effects of this pronouncement.
In December 2008,
the FASB issued Staff Position No. FAS 132(R)-1,
Employers Disclosures about Post-Retirement Benefit
Plan Assets. It is effective for financial statements
issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after
December 15, 2009. We are currently studying the effects of
this pronouncement.
In November 2008,
the FASB issued
EITF 08-08,
Accounting for an Instrument (or an Embedded Feature) with
a Settlement Amount That Is Based on the Stock of an
Entitys Consolidated Subsidiary, which addresses the
fair value of an outstanding instrument and its presentation. It
is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning
after December 15, 2008. We are currently studying the
effects of this pronouncement.
In November 2008,
the FASB issued
EITF 08-06,
Equity Method Investment Accounting Considerations,
which clarifies the accounting for certain transactions and
impairment considerations involving equity method investments.
It is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years
and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2008. We
are currently studying the effects of this pronouncement.
In October 2008, the
FASB issued Staff Position
No. FAS 157-3,
Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset in a
Market That Is Not Active
(FSP 157-3),
which clarifies the application of SFAS 157 when the market
for a financial asset is inactive. Specifically,
FSP 157-3
clarifies how (1) managements internal assumptions
should be considered in measuring fair value when observable
data are not present, (2) observable market information
from an inactive market should be taken into account, and
(3) the use of broker quotes or pricing services should be
considered in assessing the relevance of observable and
unobservable data to measure fair
F-12
value. The guidance
in
FSP 157-3
was effective immediately upon issuance and did not generate
impact on our Financial Statements.
In June 2008, the
FASB issued FSP
EITF 03-6-1,
Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based
Payment Transactions are Participating Securities. The FSP
provides that instruments granted in share-based payment
transactions that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or
dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating
securities prior to vesting and, therefore, need to be included
in the earnings allocation in computing earnings per share (EPS)
under the two-class method described in paragraphs 60 and
61 of FASB Statement No. 128, Earnings per Share. It is
effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and
interim periods beginning after December 15, 2008. Early
application is not permitted. We are currently studying the
effects of this pronouncement.
In May 2008, the
FASB issued FSP
APB 14-1,
Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be
Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash
Settlement). According to this FSP these debt instruments
are not addressed by paragraph 12 of APB Opinion
No. 14, Accounting for Convertible Debt and Debt Issued
with Stock Purchase Warrants. Additionally, it specifies that
issuers of such instruments should separately account for the
liability and equity components in a manner that will reflect
the entitys nonconvertible debt borrowing rate when
interest cost is recognized in subsequent periods. This FSP is
effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2008. We are currently
studying the effects of this pronouncement.
In May 2008, the
FASB issued FAS 162, The Hierarchy of Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles. The objective of this
Statement is to identify the sources of accounting principles
and the framework for selecting the principles used in the
preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities
that are presented in conformity with U.S. GAAP (the GAAP
hierarchy). This Statement shall be effective 60 days
following the SECs approval of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) amendments to AU
Section 411, The Meaning of Present Fairly in
Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.
There are no specific disclosure requirements with this
statement. We are currently assessing the effects of this
Statement and believe that it will not have a material impact on
our Consolidation Financial Statements.
In April 2008, the
FASB issued FSP
FAS 142-3,
Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible
Assets. The objective of this FSP is to address situations
of renewing or extending the useful life of a recognized
intangible asset. It is effective for financial statements
issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after
December 15, 2008. Early application is not permitted. We
are currently studying the effects of this pronouncement.
In December 2007,
the FASB issued SFAS 160, which clarifies that a no
controlling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership interest in
the consolidated entity that should be reported as equity in the
consolidated financial statements. SFAS 160 is effective
for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years,
beginning on or after December 15, 2008 (that is, in the
case of Vale, January 1, 2009).
In December 2007,
the FASB issued SFAS 141(R), that applies prospectively to
business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or
after the beginning of the first annual reporting period
beginning on or after December 15, 2008 (that is, in the
case of Vale, January 1, 2009).
5 Major
acquisitions and dispositions
In February 2008, we
sold our interest in Jubilee Mines N.L. (held through Vale
Inco), representing 4.83% of its common shares, for US$134
generating a gain of US$80.
F-13
In October 2007, we
were awarded, in a public auction, a
30-year
sub-concession agreement to operate the Ferrovia Norte Sul
S.A. FNS railway for R$1,482 million equivalent
to US$837 at the exchange rate in effect on that date, payable
in three installments. The first installment, equivalent to
US$412 and corresponding to 50% was paid in December 2007. The
second and third installments, each representing 25% of the
total amount, are to be paid upon the completion of the
railroad. The outstanding installments are indexed to the
general price index (IGP-DI) and accrue interest of 12% p.a.
This sub-concession right has been accounted for as an
intangible asset (Note 11).
In July 2007, we
sold our interest in Lion Ore Mining International Ltd. (held
through Vale Inco), representing 1.80% of its common shares for
US$105, generating a gain of US$80.
In June 2007, we
sold 25,213,664 common shares, representing 57.84% of the total
capital of our subsidiary Log-In Logística Intermodal S.A.
(Log-In) for US$179, recording a gain of US$155. In
July 2007, we sold an additional 5.10% stake in Log-In for US$24
recording a gain of US$21. At December 31, 2008, we held
31.33% of the voting and total capital of this entity, which is
accounted for under the equity method.
In May 2007, we sold
part (12.43%) of our stockholding in Usinas Siderúrgicas de
Minas Gerais S.A. - Usiminas, an available-for-sale
investee, for US$728, recording a gain of US$456. We have
retained 5.89% of the ordinary shares the minimum number of
shares required to participate in the current shareholders
agreement of the investee, representing 2.93% of the total
capital.
In May 2007, we
acquired a further 6.25% of the total share capital of
Empreendimentos Brasileiros de Mineração S.A. -
EBM, whose main asset is its interest in MBR, for US$231 and as
a result, our direct and indirect stake in MBR increased to
92.99% of total and voting capital. We simultaneously entered
into a usufruct agreement with minority shareholders whereby
they transferred to us all rights and obligations with respect
to their shares, including rights to dividends for the next
30 years, for which we will make an initial payment of
US$61 plus an annual fee of US$48 for each of the next
29 years. The present value of the future obligation is
recorded as a liability and the corresponding charge recorded to
minority interests in the balance sheet.
In April 2007, we
concluded the acquisition of 100% of Vale Australia (formerly
AMCI Holdings Australia Pty AMCI HA), a private
company based in Australia, which owns and operates coal mines
in that country, for US$656.
6 Income
taxes
Income taxes in
Brazil comprise federal income tax and social contribution,
which is an additional federal tax. The statutory composite
enacted tax rate applicable in the periods presented is 34%. In
other countries where we have operations, the applicable tax
rates vary from 1.67% to 40%.
F-14
The amount reported
as income tax expense in our consolidated financial statements
is reconciled to the statutory rates as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Brazil
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Brazil
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Income before income taxes, equity results and minority interests
|
|
|
2,434
|
|
|
|
10,783
|
|
|
|
13,217
|
|
|
|
7,769
|
|
|
|
7,464
|
|
|
|
15,233
|
|
|
|
7,829
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax at Brazilian composite rate
|
|
|
(828
|
)
|
|
|
(3,667
|
)
|
|
|
(4,495
|
)
|
|
|
(2,641
|
)
|
|
|
(2,538
|
)
|
|
|
(5,179
|
)
|
|
|
(2,662
|
)
|
Adjustments to derive effective tax rate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit on interest attributed to stockholders
|
|
|
692
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
692
|
|
|
|
474
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
474
|
|
|
|
343
|
|
Difference on tax rates of foreign income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,728
|
|
|
|
1,728
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,729
|
|
|
|
1,729
|
|
|
|
1,129
|
|
Exchange variation - not taxable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
982
|
|
|
|
982
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(290
|
)
|
|
|
(290
|
)
|
|
|
(125
|
)
|
Tax incentives
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
194
|
|
Valuation allowance reversal (provision)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
Other non-taxable gains (losses)
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
505
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
(188
|
)
|
|
|
(124
|
)
|
|
|
(290
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes per consolidated statements of income
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
|
(739
|
)
|
|
|
(535
|
)
|
|
|
(1,914
|
)
|
|
|
(1,287
|
)
|
|
|
(3,201
|
)
|
|
|
(1,432
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have certain
Brazilian income tax incentives relating to our manganese
operations in Carajás, our potash operations in Rosario do
Catete, our alumina and aluminum operations in Barcarena and our
kaolin operations in Ipixuna and Mazagão. The incentives
relating to manganese, aluminum and kaolin comprise partial
exemption up to 2013. The incentive relating to alumina and
potash comprises full income tax exemption on defined production
levels, which expires in 2009 and 2013, respectively. An amount
equal to the tax saving is appropriated from retained earnings
to a reserve account within stockholders equity and may
not be distributed in the form of cash dividends.
We also have income
tax incentives related to our Goro Project under development in
New Caledonia (The Goro Project). These incentives
include an income tax holiday during the construction phase of
the project and throughout a
15-year
period commencing in the first year in which commercial
production, as defined by the applicable legislation, is
achieved followed by a five-year, 50% income tax holiday. The
Goro Project also qualifies for certain exemptions from indirect
taxes such as import duties during the construction phase and
throughout the commercial life of the project. Certain of these
tax benefits, including the income tax holiday, are subject to
an earlier phase out should the project achieve a specified
cumulative rate of return. We are subject to a branch profit tax
commencing in the first year in which commercial production is
achieved, as defined by the applicable legislation. To date, we
have not recorded any taxable income for New Caledonian tax
purposes. The benefits of this legislation are expected to apply
with respect to taxes payable once the Goro project is in
operation.
We are subject to
examination by the tax authorities for up to five years
regarding our operations in Brazil, ten years for Indonesia, and
five and six years for Canada, except for Newfoundland which has
no limit.
Brazilian tax loss
carryforwards have no expiration date though offset is
restricted to 30% of annual taxable income.
Effective
January 1, 2007, the Company adopted the provisions of FASB
Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes.
F-15
The reconciliation
of the beginning and ending amounts of unrecognized tax benefits
is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Beginning of the period
|
|
|
1,046
|
|
|
|
663
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase resulting from tax positions taken
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
264
|
|
Decrease resulting from tax positions taken
|
|
|
(261
|
)
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
Changes in tax legislation
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
Cumulative translation adjustments
|
|
|
(233
|
)
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of the period
|
|
|
657
|
|
|
|
1,046
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized deferred
income tax assets and liabilities are composed as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Current deferred tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses deductible only when disbursed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term deferred tax assets and liabilities
|
|
|
583
|
|
|
|
603
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee post-retirement benefits provision
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
461
|
|
Tax loss carryforwards
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
348
|
|
Other temporary differences
|
|
|
548
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset retirement obligation
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,045
|
|
|
|
1,004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
Fair value of financial instruments
|
|
|
(326
|
)
|
|
|
(173
|
)
|
Unrealized tax indexation effects
|
|
|
(108
|
)
|
|
|
(138
|
)
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
(150
|
)
|
Prepaid retirement benefit
|
|
|
(199
|
)
|
|
|
(203
|
)
|
Fair value adjustments in business combinations
|
|
|
(4,446
|
)
|
|
|
(5,770
|
)
|
Other temporary differences
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
(191
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,928
|
)
|
|
|
(6,625
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
|
(104
|
)
|
|
|
(113
|
)
|
Translation adjustments
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
Change in allowance
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
|
(122
|
)
|
|
|
(104
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net long-term deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(4,005
|
)
|
|
|
(5,725
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 Cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
December 31,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
767
|
|
|
424
|
Short-term investments denominated in Brazilian Reais
|
|
|
7,548
|
|
|
123
|
Short-term investments denominated in other currencies, mainly
U.S. dollars
|
|
|
2,016
|
|
|
499
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,331
|
|
|
1,046
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in cash
and cash equivalents corresponds mainly to the proceeds received
from the global equity offering (Note 16).
F-16
8 Accounts
receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Customers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominated in Brazilian Reais
|
|
|
461
|
|
|
|
750
|
|
Denominated in other currencies, mainly U.S. dollars
|
|
|
2,828
|
|
|
|
3,311
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,289
|
|
|
|
4,061
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(85
|
)
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
Allowance for ore weight credits
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
3,204
|
|
|
|
3,952
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
from customers in the steel industry represent 47% of
receivables at December 31, 2008.
No single customer
accounted for more than 10% of total revenues.
Additional
allowances for doubtful accounts charged to the statement of
income as expenses in 2008 and 2007 totaled US$9 and US$31,
respectively. We did not make any write-offs in 2008, and we
wrote-off US$6 in 2007.
9 Inventories
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
December 31,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
Finished products
|
|
|
|
|
Nickel (co-products and by-products)
|
|
1,514
|
|
1,812
|
Iron ore and pellets
|
|
728
|
|
588
|
Manganese and ferroalloys
|
|
199
|
|
176
|
Aluminum products
|
|
150
|
|
106
|
Kaolin
|
|
40
|
|
42
|
Copper concentrate
|
|
26
|
|
15
|
Coal
|
|
43
|
|
38
|
Others
|
|
80
|
|
36
|
Spare parts and maintenance supplies
|
|
1,116
|
|
1,046
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,896
|
|
3,859
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
2008, we recorded an adjustment of US$77, to reduce nickel
inventory to its market value (nil in 2007 and 2006).
10 Recoverable
taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
December 31,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
Income tax
|
|
1,646
|
|
643
|
Value-added tax ICMS
|
|
258
|
|
294
|
PIS and COFINS
|
|
380
|
|
354
|
Others
|
|
103
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
2,387
|
|
1,358
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
1,993
|
|
1,159
|
Non-current
|
|
394
|
|
199
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,387
|
|
1,358
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-17
11 Property,
plant and equipment and intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December,
31
|
|
As of December,
31
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
depreciation
|
|
Net
|
|
Cost
|
|
depreciation
|
|
Net
|
|
Land
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
3,742
|
|
|
905
|
|
2,837
|
|
|
4,086
|
|
|
842
|
|
|
3,244
|
|
Installations
|
|
|
9,990
|
|
|
2,748
|
|
7,242
|
|
|
10,974
|
|
|
2,889
|
|
|
8,085
|
|
Equipment
|
|
|
5,391
|
|
|
1,626
|
|
3,765
|
|
|
5,703
|
|
|
1,709
|
|
|
3,994
|
|
Railroads
|
|
|
5,830
|
|
|
1,358
|
|
4,472
|
|
|
5,819
|
|
|
1,614
|
|
|
4,205
|
|
Mine development costs
|
|
|
15,976
|
|
|
2,062
|
|
13,914
|
|
|
19,270
|
|
|
1,632
|
|
|
17,638
|
|
Others
|
|
|
4,974
|
|
|
1,639
|
|
3,335
|
|
|
7,146
|
|
|
1,813
|
|
|
5,333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,085
|
|
|
10,338
|
|
35,747
|
|
|
53,108
|
|
|
10,499
|
|
|
42,609
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
13,582
|
|
|
|
|
13,582
|
|
|
12,016
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
59,667
|
|
|
10,338
|
|
49,329
|
|
|
65,124
|
|
|
10,499
|
|
|
54,625
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses on disposal
of property, plant and equipment totaled US$376, US$168 and
US$106 in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. These losses mainly
related to losses on sales of ships and trucks, locomotives and
other equipment, which were replaced in the normal course of
business.
Assets given in
guarantee of judicial processes totaled US$141.
Hydroelectric
assets
We participate in
several jointly-owned hydroelectric plants, already in operation
or under construction. We record our undivided interest in these
assets as property, plant and equipment.
At December 31,
2008, the cost of hydroelectric plants in service totaled
US$1,162 (2007 US$803) and the related depreciation in the year
was US$304 (2007 US$68). The cost of hydroelectric plant under
construction at December 31, 2008 totaled US$206 (2007
US$735). Income and operating expenses for such plants were not
material.
Intangibles
All of the
intangible assets recognized in our financial statements were
acquired from third parties, either directly or through a
business combination and have definite useful lives from 6 to
30 years.
At December 31,
2008 the intangibles amount to US$875 (December 31,
2007 - US$1,113), and are comprised of rights granted by
the government North-South Railroad of US$671 and
off- take agreements of US$204.
F-18
12 Investments
in affiliated companies and joint ventures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in
earnings (losses) of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
investee
adjustments
|
|
|
Dividends
received
|
|
|
|
Participation
in
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
(loss) for the
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
Year ended of
December, 31
|
|
|
Year ended of
December 31,
|
|
|
|
capital (%)
|
|
|
equity
|
|
|
year
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Voting
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ferrous
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Companhia Nipo-Brasileira de Pelotização
NIBRASCO(1)
|
|
|
51.11
|
|
|
|
51.00
|
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Companhia Hispano-Brasileira de
Pelotização HISPANOBRÁS(1)
|
|
|
51.00
|
|
|
|
50.89
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Companhia Coreano-Brasileira de
Pelotização KOBRASCO(1)
|
|
|
50.00
|
|
|
|
50.00
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
Companhia Ítalo-Brasileira de
Pelotização ITABRASCO(1)
|
|
|
51.00
|
|
|
|
50.90
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Minas da Serra Geral S.A. MSG
|
|
|
50.00
|
|
|
|
50.00
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
SAMARCO Mineração S.A. SAMARCO(2)
|
|
|
50.00
|
|
|
|
50.00
|
|
|
|
732
|
|
|
|
629
|
|
|
|
412
|
|
|
|
546
|
|
|
|
315
|
|
|
|
242
|
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
225
|
|
Others
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
755
|
|
|
|
801
|
|
|
|
543
|
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
|
312
|
|
|
|
319
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
295
|
|
Logistics
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LOG-IN Logística Intermodal S.A.(3)
|
|
|
31.33
|
|
|
|
31.33
|
|
|
|
282
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MRS Log ística S.A.
|
|
|
37.86
|
|
|
|
41.50
|
|
|
|
786
|
|
|
|
273
|
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
|
342
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
420
|
|
|
|
449
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
Holdings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California Steel Industries Inc. CSI
|
|
|
50.00
|
|
|
|
50.00
|
|
|
|
320
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
THYSSENKRUPP CSA Companhia Siderúrgica (cost $431)
available-for-sale
|
|
|
10.46
|
|
|
|
10.46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
443
|
|
|
|
388
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Usinas Siderúrgicas de Minas Gerais S.A.
USIMINAS (cost $180) available-for sale(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
465
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
767
|
|
|
|
1,016
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
Bauxite
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mineração Rio do Norte S.A. MRN
|
|
|
40.00
|
|
|
|
40.00
|
|
|
|
347
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
Valesul Alumínio S.A. VALESUL(5)
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
Coal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Henan Longyu Resources Co. Ltd.
|
|
|
25.00
|
|
|
|
25.00
|
|
|
|
703
|
|
|
|
315
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Shandong Yankuang International Company Ltd.
|
|
|
25.00
|
|
|
|
25.00
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Nickel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heron Resources Inc (cost $25) available-for-sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jubilee Mines N.L (cost $5) available-for-sale(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mirabela Nickel Ltd (cost $24) available-for-sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hudbay Minerals (cost $31) available-for-sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corea Nickel Corp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Skye Resources(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Others
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
299
|
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other affiliates and joint ventures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Others
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,233
|
|
|
|
1,672
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,408
|
|
|
|
2,922
|
|
|
|
794
|
|
|
|
595
|
|
|
|
710
|
|
|
|
513
|
|
|
|
394
|
|
|
|
516
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Although
Vale held a majority of the voting interest of investees
accounted for under the equity method, existing veto rights held
by minority shareholders under shareholder agreements preclude
consolidation.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Investment
includes goodwill of US$46 in 2008 and US$61 in 2007.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Consolidation
discontinued from June 2007.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Sold
in February 2008 (Note 5).
|
|
(5)
|
|
Equity
in results of affiliates refers to dividends received.
|
|
(6)
|
|
Losses
considered other than temporary.
|
F-19
13 Impairment
of goodwill
As described in
Note 3(g), we test goodwill and long-lived assets for
impairment at least annually, or more frequently when events or
changes in circumstances indicate that they might be impaired.
For impairment test purposes goodwill is allocated to reporting
units.
Following the
downturn in the economy, which contributed to the decline in the
prices of certain commodities produced by us during the last
quarter of 2008, we updated our impairment test based on
forecasted discounted cash flows. As a result, we determined
that the goodwill associated with the acquisition of Vale Inco,
included within the reportable segment
Non-ferrousnickel was partially impaired. In
the case of Vale Inco, goodwill has been allocated by us to the
finished products and intermediate products reporting units. The
impairment charge recorded in operating results in the fourth
quarter of 2008 was US$950.
Management
determined discounted cash flows based on approved financial
budgets. Gross margin projections were based on past performance
and managements expectations of market developments.
Information about sales prices are consistent with the forecasts
included in industry reports, considering quoted prices when
available and when appropriate. The discount rates used reflect
specific risks relating to the relevant assets in each reporting
unit, depending on their composition and location.
Recognition of
additional goodwill impairment charges in the future would
depend on several estimates including market conditions, recent
actual results and managements forecasts. This information
shall be obtained at the time when our assessment is to be
updated. It is not possible at this time to determine if any
such future impairment charge would result or, if it does,
whether such charge would be material.
14 Short-term
debt
Short-term
borrowings outstanding on December 31, 2007 were mainly
from commercial banks for export financing denominated in
U.S. dollars, with average annual interest rates of 5.5%.
F-20
15 Long-term
debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
liabilities
|
|
|
Long-term
liabilities
|
|
Foreign debt
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Loans and financing denominated in the following currencies:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollars
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
|
5,905
|
|
|
|
5,927
|
|
Others
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
214
|
|
Fixed rate notes U.S. dollar denominated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,510
|
|
|
|
6,680
|
|
Debt securities export sales(*) U.S.
dollar denominated
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
205
|
|
Perpetual notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
Accrued charges
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
282
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
505
|
|
|
|
611
|
|
|
|
12,814
|
|
|
|
13,113
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brazilian debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brazilian Reais indexed to Long-Term Interest Rate -
TJLP/CDI
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
586
|
|
|
|
1,989
|
|
|
|
1,148
|
|
Brazilian Reais indexed to General Price Index -Market
(IGPM)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Basket of currencies
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Non-convertible debentures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,562
|
|
|
|
3,340
|
|
U.S. dollar denominated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued charges
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
638
|
|
|
|
4,721
|
|
|
|
4,495
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
633
|
|
|
|
1,249
|
|
|
|
17,535
|
|
|
|
17,608
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*)
|
|
Secured
by receivables from future export sales.
|
The long-term
portion at December 31, 2008 falls due as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2,304
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2,618
|
|
2012
|
|
|
1,137
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2,556
|
|
2014 and thereafter
|
|
|
8,628
|
|
No due date (perpetual notes and non-convertible debentures)
|
|
|
292
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,535
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
2008 annual interest rates on long-term debt were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Up to 3%
|
|
|
690
|
|
3.1% to 5%
|
|
|
5,845
|
|
5.1% to 7%(*)
|
|
|
5,596
|
|
7.1% to 9%(*)
|
|
|
2,136
|
|
9.1% to 11%
|
|
|
87
|
|
Over 11%(*)
|
|
|
3,729
|
|
Variable (perpetual notes)
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,168
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*)
|
|
Includes
non-convertible debentures and other Brazilian Reais-denominated
debt that bear interest at CDI (Brazilian interbank certificate
of deposit) and TJLP (Brazilian government long-term interest)
rates plus a spread. For these operations we have entered into
derivative transactions to mitigate our exposure on the floating
rate debt denominated in Brazilian Reais, totaling US$4,169 of
which US$3,522 has original interest rate above 11%. The average
cost after taking into account the derivative transactions is
4.9%.
|
F-21
The indexation
indices/rates applied to our debt were as follows (unaudited):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
TJLP - Long-Term Interest Rate (effective rate)
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
IGP-M - General Price Index - Market
|
|
|
9.8
|
|
|
|
7.8
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
Appreciation (devaluation) of Real against U.S. dollar
|
|
|
(24.2
|
)
|
|
|
20.7
|
|
|
|
(8.7
|
)
|
In January 2008, we
entered into a trade finance agreement with a Brazilian bank in
the amount of US$1,100 with final maturity in 2018.
During 2008, we
entered into agreements with Banco Nacional de Desenvolvimento
Econômico e Social - BNDES (the Brazilian National
Development Bank), and with long-term Japanese financing
agencies, Japan Bank for International Cooperation - JBIC
and Nippon Export and Investment Insurance - NEXI related
to future lines of credit to finance mining, logistics and power
generation projects as part of our investment program for
2008-2012.
Additionally, we
have revolving credit lines available under which amounts can be
drawn down and repaid at the option of the borrower. At
December 31, 2008, the total amount available under
revolving credit lines was of US$1,900, of which US$1,150 was
granted to Vale International and the balance to Vale Inco. As
of December 31, 2008, neither Vale International nor Vale
Inco had drawn any amounts under these facilities.
Vale Inco had drawn
down US$101 by way of letters of credit.
At December 31,
2008, the U.S. dollar denominated Fixed Rate Notes of
US$6,510 (December 31, 2007 US$6,680) and other
debt of US$11,102 (December 31, 2007 US$11,511)
were unsecured. The export securitization of US$204
(December 31, 2007 US$258) represents debt
securities collateralized by receivables from future export
sales of CVRD Overseas Ltd. Loans from international lenders of
US$57 (December 31, 2007 US$82) are guaranteed
by the Brazilian Federal Government, to which we have provided
like counter guarantees. The remaining long-term debt of US$295
(December 31, 2007 US$326) is collateralized
mainly by receivables.
Our principal
covenants require us to maintain certain ratios, such as debt to
EBITDA and interest coverage. We were in full compliance with
our financial covenants as of December 31, 2008 and 2007.
16 Stockholders
equity
Each holder of
common and preferred A stock is entitled to one vote for each
share on all matters brought before stockholders meetings,
except for the election of the Board of Directors, which is
restricted to the holders of common stock. The Brazilian
government holds twelve preferred special shares which confer
permanent veto rights over certain matters.
Both common and
preferred stockholders are entitled to receive a mandatory
minimum dividend of 25% of annual adjusted net income under
Brazilian GAAP, once declared at the annual stockholders
meeting. In the case of preferred stockholders, this dividend
cannot be less than 6% of the preferred capital as stated in the
statutory accounting records or, if greater, 3% of the Brazilian
GAAP equity value per share. For the year ended
December 31, 2008, this dividend corresponded to US$2,068,
provided against stockholders equity.
In July 2008, we
issued 80,079,223 common ADS, 176,847,543 common shares,
63,506,751 preferred ADSs and 100,896,048 preferred shares
through a global equity offering. Our capital increased by
US$11,666, upon subscription of preferred stock of US$4,146
corresponding to 164,402,799 shares and common stock of
US$7,520 corresponding to 256,926,766 shares. In August
2008, we issued an additional 24,660,419 preferred shares,
representing an increase of US$628. After the closing of the
operation, our capital stock increased by US$12,294 in 2008; the
transaction costs of US$105 were recorded as a reduction of the
additional paid-in capital account.
F-22
In September 2007, a
stock split was effected whereby each existing common and
preferred share was split into two shares. After the split our
capital comprises 4,919,314,116 shares, of which
1,919,516,400 are preferred class A shares and
2,999,797,716 are common shares, including twelve golden shares
without par value. All references to numbers of share and per
share amounts included herein reflect retroactive application of
the stock split.
In June 2007, we
issued US$1,880 of mandatorily convertible notes due
June 15, 2010 for total proceeds of US$1,869, net of
commissions. The notes bear interest at 5.50% per year payable
quarterly and additional interest which will be payable based on
the net amount of cash distribution paid to ADS holders. A
tranche of US$1,296 notes are mandatorily convertible into an
aggregate maximum of 56,582,040 common shares and a tranche of
US$584 notes are mandatorily convertible into an aggregate
maximum of 30,295,456 preferred class A shares. On the
maturity date (whether at stated maturity or upon acceleration
following an event of default), the Series RIO Notes will
automatically convert into ADSs, each ADS representing one
common share of Vale, and the Series RIO P Notes will
automatically convert into ADSs, each ADS representing one
preferred class A share of Vale. We currently hold the
shares to be issued on conversion in treasury. The notes are not
repayable in cash. Holders of notes will have no voting rights.
We will pay to the holders of our Series RIO Notes or RIO P
Notes additional interest in the event that Vale makes cash
distributions to all holders of common ADSs or preferred ADSs,
respectively. We determined, using a statistical model, that the
potential variability in the number of shares to be converted is
not a predominant feature of this hybrid financial instrument
and thus classified it as an equity instrument within
stockholders equity. Other than during the cash
acquisition conversion period, holders of the notes have the
right to convert their notes, in whole or in part, at any time
prior to maturity in the case of the Series RIO Notes, into
common ADSs at the minimum conversion rate of 0.8664 common ADSs
per Series RIO Note, and in the case of Series RIO P
Notes, into preferred ADSs at the minimum conversion rate of
1.0283 preferred ADSs per Series RIO P Note.
In April 2007, at an
Extraordinary Shareholders Meeting,
paid-up
capital was increased by US$4,187 through transfer of reserves,
without issuance of shares, to US$12,695.
Brazilian law
permits the payment of cash dividends only from retained
earnings as stated in the BR GAAP statutory records and such
payments are made in Brazilian Reais. Pursuant to the
Companys statutory books, undistributed retained earnings
at December 31, 2008 totaled US$16,854, comprising the
unrealized income and expansion reserves, which could be freely
transferred to retained earnings and paid as dividends, if
approved by the stockholders, after deducting the minimum annual
mandatory dividend.
No withholding tax
is payable on distribution of profits earned except for
distributions in the form of interest attributed to
stockholders equity (Note 3(p)).
F-23
Brazilian law and
our bylaws require that certain appropriations be made from
retained earnings to reserve accounts on an annual basis, all
determined in accordance with amounts stated in the statutory
accounting records, as detailed below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Undistributed retained earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized income reserve
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of the period
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
Transfer from (to) retained earnings
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of the period
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
Expansion reserve
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of the period
|
|
|
13,881
|
|
|
|
8,485
|
|
|
|
3,621
|
|
Transfer to capital stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,776
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Transfer from (to) retained earnings
|
|
|
2,928
|
|
|
|
9,172
|
|
|
|
4,864
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of the period
|
|
|
16,809
|
|
|
|
13,881
|
|
|
|
8,485
|
|
Legal reserve
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of the period
|
|
|
1,310
|
|
|
|
970
|
|
|
|
599
|
|
Transfer to capital stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(370
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Transfer from (to) retained earnings
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
710
|
|
|
|
371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of the period
|
|
|
1,448
|
|
|
|
1,310
|
|
|
|
970
|
|
Fiscal incentive investment reserve
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of the period
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
Transfer to capital stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Transfer from (to) retained earnings
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of the period
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total undistributed retained earnings
|
|
|
18,340
|
|
|
|
15,317
|
|
|
|
9,555
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The purpose and
basis of appropriation to such reserves is described below:
Unrealized income
reserve - this represents principally our share of the
earnings of affiliates and joint ventures, not yet received in
the form of cash dividends.
Expansion
reserve - this is a general reserve for expansion of our
activities.
Legal reserve -
this reserve is a requirement for all Brazilian corporations and
represents the appropriation of 5% of annual net income up to a
limit of 20% of capital stock all determined under Brazilian
GAAP.
Fiscal incentive
investment reserve - this reserve results from an option to
designate a portion of income tax otherwise payable for
investment in government approved projects and is recorded in
the year following that in which the taxable income was earned.
Since 2000, this reserve basically contemplates income tax
incentives (Note 6).
F-24
Basic and diluted
earnings per share
Basic and diluted
earnings per share amounts have been calculated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Net income for the period
|
|
|
13,218
|
|
|
|
11,825
|
|
|
|
6,528
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest attributed to preferred convertible notes
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Interest attributed to common convertible notes
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net income for the period adjusted
|
|
|
13,076
|
|
|
|
11,772
|
|
|
|
6,528
|
|
Basic and diluted earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income available to preferred stockholders
|
|
|
5,027
|
|
|
|
4,552
|
|
|
|
2,568
|
|
Income available to common stockholders
|
|
|
7,823
|
|
|
|
7,092
|
|
|
|
3,960
|
|
Income available to convertible notes linked to preferred shares
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income available to convertible notes linked to common shares
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding (thousands of
shares) - preferred shares
|
|
|
1,946,454
|
|
|
|
1,889,171
|
|
|
|
1,908,852
|
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding (thousands of
shares) - common shares
|
|
|
3,028,817
|
|
|
|
2,943,216
|
|
|
|
2,943,216
|
|
Treasury preferred shares linked to mandatorily convertible notes
|
|
|
30,295
|
|
|
|
18,478
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury common shares linked to mandatorily convertible notes
|
|
|
56,582
|
|
|
|
34,510
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
5,062,148
|
|
|
|
4,885,375
|
|
|
|
4,852,068
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per preferred share
|
|
|
2.58
|
|
|
|
2.41
|
|
|
|
1.35
|
|
Earnings per common share
|
|
|
2.58
|
|
|
|
2.41
|
|
|
|
1.35
|
|
Earnings per preferred share linked to convertible note(*)
|
|
|
4.09
|
|
|
|
3.30
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share linked to convertible note(*)
|
|
|
4.29
|
|
|
|
3.51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) Basic earnings per share only, as dilution assumes
conversion.
|
Had the conversion
of the convertible notes been included in the calculation of
diluted earnings per share they would have generated the
following dilutive effect as shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
December 31,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Income available to preferred stockholders
|
|
|
5,151
|
|
|
|
4,613
|
|
|
|
|
Income available to common stockholders
|
|
|
8,067
|
|
|
|
7,212
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding (thousands of
shares) - preferred shares
|
|
|
1,976,749
|
|
|
|
1,907,649
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding (thousands of
shares) - common shares
|
|
|
3,085,399
|
|
|
|
2,977,726
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per preferred share
|
|
|
2.61
|
|
|
|
2.42
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share
|
|
|
2.61
|
|
|
|
2.42
|
|
|
|
|
F-25
17 Other
cumulative comprehensive income (deficit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (deficit) is comprised as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
13,218
|
|
|
|
11,825
|
|
|
|
6,528
|
|
Cumulative translation adjustments
|
|
|
(12,833
|
)
|
|
|
2,968
|
|
|
|
1,228
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) - available-for-sale securities, net
of tax
|
|
|
(194
|
)
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
|
|
144
|
|
Surplus (deficit) accrued pension plan
|
|
|
(109
|
)
|
|
|
(278
|
)
|
|
|
(107
|
)
|
Cash flow hedge
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income (deficit)
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
14,484
|
|
|
|
7,793
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax effect on other comprehensive income allocated to each
component
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) - available-for-sale securities, net
of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross balance as of the period end
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
395
|
|
Tax (expense) benefit
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
|
|
(124
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net balance as of the period end
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Surplus accrued pension plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross balance as of the period end
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
540
|
|
Tax (expense) benefit
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
(187
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net balance as of the period end
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
353
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 Pension
plans
Since 1973, we
sponsor a supplementary social security plan with
characteristics of a defined benefit plan (the Old
Plan) covering substantially all Brazilian employees, with
benefits calculated based on years of service, age, contribution
salary and supplementary social security benefits. This plan is
administered by Fundação Vale do Rio Doce de
Seguridade Social VALIA and was funded by monthly
contributions made by us and our employees, calculated based on
periodic actuarial appraisals.
In May 2000, we
implemented a new supplementary social security plan with
characteristics of defined contribution, which complements the
earnings of programmed retirements. The plan offers benefits to
cover death, physical handicap and sickness, with defined
benefit characteristics. Brazilian employees could opt to
migrate to the New Plan (a Benefit Mix
Plan Vale Mais) which was taken up by over 98% of
our employees. The Old Plan will continue in existence, covering
almost exclusively retired participants and their beneficiaries.
Additionally, we
provide supplementary payments to a specific group of former
Brazilian employees in addition to the regular benefits from
Valia. The plan provides represents a post-retirement health
care, dental and pharmaceutical benefits.
Upon the acquisition
of Inco, we assumed benefits through defined benefit pension
plans that cover essentially all its employees and
post-retirement benefits other than pensions that also provide
certain health care and life insurance benefits for retired
employees.
The following
information details the status of the defined benefit elements
of all plans in accordance with SFAS 132
Employers Disclosure about Pensions and Other
Post-Retirement Benefits and SFAS 158
Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and
Other Post-Retirement Plans, as amended.
F-26
(a) Change
in benefit obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Overfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
Overfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
|
pension
|
|
|
pension
|
|
|
other
|
|
|
pension
|
|
|
pension
|
|
|
other
|
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
benefits
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
benefits
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at beginning of year
|
|
|
3,178
|
|
|
|
4,436
|
|
|
|
1,671
|
|
|
|
2,531
|
|
|
|
3,743
|
|
|
|
1,287
|
|
Liability recognized upon consolidation of Inco
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
213
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
309
|
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
306
|
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
Plan amendment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(283
|
)
|
|
|
(291
|
)
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
|
|
(301
|
)
|
|
|
(279
|
)
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes
|
|
|
(779
|
)
|
|
|
(775
|
)
|
|
|
(272
|
)
|
|
|
526
|
|
|
|
607
|
|
|
|
215
|
|
Actuarial loss (gain)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(660
|
)
|
|
|
(370
|
)
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(79
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at end of year
|
|
|
2,424
|
|
|
|
3,031
|
|
|
|
1,069
|
|
|
|
3,178
|
|
|
|
4,436
|
|
|
|
1,671
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We use a measurement
date of December 31 for our pension and post-retirement benefit
plans.
(b) Change
in plan assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Overfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
Overfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
|
pension
|
|
|
pension
|
|
|
other
|
|
|
pension
|
|
|
pension
|
|
|
other
|
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
benefits
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
benefits
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year
|
|
|
4,187
|
|
|
|
3,762
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
3,508
|
|
|
|
3,078
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
(603
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Employer contributions
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
272
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
372
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(283
|
)
|
|
|
(291
|
)
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
|
|
(301
|
)
|
|
|
(279
|
)
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes
|
|
|
(959
|
)
|
|
|
(633
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
697
|
|
|
|
506
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at end of year
|
|
|
3,043
|
|
|
|
2,507
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
4,187
|
|
|
|
3,762
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan assets at
December 31, 2008 included US$188 (US$693 at
December 31, 2007) and US$53 (US$73 at
December 31, 2007) of portfolio investments in our own
shares and debentures, respectively, and US$44 (US$48 at
December 31, 2007) of shares of related parties. They
also included US$2,472 of Brazilian Federal Government
securities (US$1,116 at December 31, 2007) and US$347
of Canada Federal Government securities (US$475 at
December 31, 2007).
(c) Funded
status and financial position
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Overfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
Overfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
|
pension
|
|
|
pension
|
|
|
other
|
|
|
pension
|
|
|
pension
|
|
|
other
|
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
benefits
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
benefits
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
619
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1,009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
Long-term liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
486
|
|
|
|
999
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
620
|
|
|
|
1,584
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status
|
|
|
619
|
|
|
|
524
|
|
|
|
1,060
|
|
|
|
1,009
|
|
|
|
674
|
|
|
|
1,661
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-27
(d) Assumptions
used (nominal terms)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brazil
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Overfunded
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
Overfunded
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
pension
|
|
pension
|
|
other
|
|
pension
|
|
pension
|
|
other
|
|
|
plans
|
|
plans
|
|
benefits
|
|
plans
|
|
plans
|
|
benefits
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
11.28% p.a.
|
|
|
11.28% p.a.
|
|
|
11.28% p.a.
|
|
|
10.24% p.a.
|
|
|
10.24% p.a.
|
|
|
10.24% p.a.
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
12.22% p.a.
|
|
|
13.00% p.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.78% p.a.
|
|
|
11.70% p.a.
|
|
|
|
Rate of compensation increase up to 47 years
|
|
|
7.12% p.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.12% p.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate of compensation increase over 47 years
|
|
|
4.00% p.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.00% p.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inflation
|
|
|
4.00% p.a.
|
|
|
4.00% p.a.
|
|
|
4.00% p.a.
|
|
|
4.00% p.a.
|
|
|
4.00% p.a.
|
|
|
4.00% p.a.
|
Health care cost trend rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.12% p.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.64% p.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Overfunded
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
Overfunded
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
pension
|
|
pension
|
|
other
|
|
pension
|
|
pension
|
|
other
|
|
|
plans
|
|
plans
|
|
benefits
|
|
plans
|
|
plans
|
|
benefits
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.58% p.a.
|
|
|
7.32% p.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.21% p.a.
|
|
|
5.55% p.a.
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.99% p.a.
|
|
|
7.35% p.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.18% p.a.
|
|
|
7.50% p.a.
|
Rate of compensation increase up to 47 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.12% p.a.
|
|
|
3.58% p.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.01% p.a.
|
|
|
3.58% p.a.
|
Rate of compensation increase over 47 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.12% p.a.
|
|
|
3.58% p.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.01% p.a.
|
|
|
3.58% p.a.
|
Inflation
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.00% p.a.
|
|
|
2.00% p.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.00% p.a.
|
|
|
2.00% p.a.
|
Health care cost trend rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.19% p.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.35% p.a.
|
(e) Investment
targets and composition of plan assets
|
|
|
|
|
Overfunded
pension plans
|
The fair value of
the Brazil overfunded pension plan assets was US$3,043 and
US$4,187 at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. There
were no foreign overfunded pension plans assets at the period
end. The asset allocation for these plans at December 31,
2008 and 2007, and the target allocation for 2009, by asset
category, follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of
plan assets - Brazil
|
|
|
Target for
2009
|
|
At
December 31,
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
26%
|
|
|
20%
|
|
|
29%
|
Real estate
|
|
|
6%
|
|
|
4%
|
|
|
4%
|
Loans
|
|
|
7%
|
|
|
6%
|
|
|
4%
|
Fixed income
|
|
|
61%
|
|
|
70%
|
|
|
63%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underfunded
pension plans
|
The fair value of
the underfunded pension plan assets was US$146 and US$146 at the
end of 2008 and 2007, respectively, for Brazilian plans and
US$2,361 and US$3,616 at the end of 2008 and 2007, respectively,
for foreign plans. The asset allocation for these plans at the
end of 2008
F-28
(Brazil and foreign)
and 2007 (Brazil and foreign), and the target allocation for
2009, by asset category, follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of
plan assets - Brazil
|
|
|
Target for
2009
|
|
At
December 31,
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
0%
|
|
|
0%
|
|
|
5%
|
Fixed income
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
95%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of
plan assets - Foreign
|
|
|
Target for
2009
|
|
At
December 31,
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
61%
|
|
|
54%
|
|
|
61%
|
Fixed income
|
|
|
39%
|
|
|
46%
|
|
|
39%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The asset allocation
policy follows the asset class targets determined by our
ALM Asset Allocation Modeling. The fixed income
asset allocation target for the Brazilian plans was established
in order to surpass the benefit obligation and to be used for
the payment of short-term plans. The proposal for 2009 is to
increase the investments in inflation-indexed bonds.
The target for
equity securities of these plans reflects the expected
appreciation of the Brazilian stock markets and its expected
long term return.
The asset allocation
policy for the foreign plans of 39% fixed income and 61% equity
securities, approximates the policy mix through a rebalancing
policy.
|
|
|
|
|
Underfunded other
benefits
|
The fair value of
the foreign underfunded other benefit assets was US$9 and US$10
at the end of 2008 and 2007, respectively. There were no
Brazilian underfunded other benefit assets in our
post-retirement benefit other than pensions at the period end.
The asset allocation
for these benefits at the end of 2008 and target allocation for
2009, by asset category, follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of
plan assets - Foreign
|
|
|
Target for
2009
|
|
At
December 31,
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
61%
|
|
|
61%
|
|
|
61%
|
Fixed income
|
|
|
39%
|
|
|
39%
|
|
|
39%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The asset allocation
policy is the same for the foreign underfunded pension plan.
F-29
(f) Pension
costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Overfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
Overfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
|
pension
|
|
|
pension
|
|
|
other
|
|
|
pension
|
|
|
pension
|
|
|
other
|
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
benefits
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
benefits
|
|
|
Service cost benefits earned during the period
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation
|
|
|
309
|
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
306
|
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
Expected return on assets
|
|
|
(515
|
)
|
|
|
(253
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(570
|
)
|
|
|
(247
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Amortization of initial transition obligation
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferral
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension cost
|
|
|
(185
|
)
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
(258
|
)
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(g) Expected
contributions and benefits
Employer
contributions expected for 2009 are US$338.
The benefit
payments, which reflect future service, are expected to be made
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Overfunded
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
|
|
pension
|
|
pension
|
|
other
|
|
|
|
|
plans
|
|
plans
|
|
benefits
|
|
Total
|
|
2009
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
525
|
2010
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
532
|
2011
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
261
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
536
|
2012
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
260
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
539
|
2013
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
256
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
539
|
2014 and thereafter
|
|
|
1,011
|
|
|
1,265
|
|
|
412
|
|
|
2,688
|
(h) Accumulated
benefit obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Overfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
Overfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
|
pension
|
|
|
pension
|
|
|
other
|
|
|
pension
|
|
|
pension
|
|
|
other
|
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
benefits
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
benefits
|
|
|
Accumulated benefit obligation
|
|
|
2,415
|
|
|
|
2,955
|
|
|
|
1,069
|
|
|
|
3,166
|
|
|
|
4,293
|
|
|
|
1,671
|
|
Projected benefit obligation
|
|
|
2,424
|
|
|
|
3,031
|
|
|
|
1,069
|
|
|
|
3,178
|
|
|
|
4,436
|
|
|
|
1,671
|
|
Fair value of plan assets
|
|
|
(3,043
|
)
|
|
|
(2,507
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(4,187
|
)
|
|
|
(3,762
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
(i) Impact
of 1% variation in assumed health care cost trend rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1%
increase
|
|
1%
increase
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
Accumulated post-retirement benefit obligation (APBO)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
261
|
|
|
(110)
|
|
|
(201)
|
Interest and service costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
(14)
|
|
|
(12)
|
F-30
(j) Other
cumulative comprehensive income (deficit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Overfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
Overfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
|
pension
|
|
|
pension
|
|
|
other
|
|
|
pension
|
|
|
pension
|
|
|
other
|
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
benefits
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
benefits
|
|
|
Net transition assets
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net actuarial loss/(gain)
|
|
|
(240
|
)
|
|
|
(206
|
)
|
|
|
402
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
97
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Deferred income tax
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
(146
|
)
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts recognized in other cumulative comprehensive income
(deficit)
|
|
|
(180
|
)
|
|
|
(113
|
)
|
|
|
259
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(k) Change
in other cumulative comprehensive income (deficit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Overfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
Overfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
|
pension
|
|
|
pension
|
|
|
other
|
|
|
pension
|
|
|
pension
|
|
|
other
|
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
benefits
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
benefits
|
|
|
Net transition obligation/(asset) not yet recognized in NPPC at
beginning of period
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net actuarial loss/(gain) not yet recognized in NPPC at
beginning of period
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
491
|
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
Deferred income tax at beginning of period
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
(154
|
)
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of initial recognition of cumulative comprehensive income
(deficit)
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
290
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Change in the period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of net transition obligation/(asset)
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of net actuarial loss/(gain)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net actuarial loss/(gain) arising during period
|
|
|
(328
|
)
|
|
|
(166
|
)
|
|
|
307
|
|
|
|
(480
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
108
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Deferred income tax
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
(111
|
)
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recognized in other cumulative comprehensive income
(deficit)
|
|
|
(180
|
)
|
|
|
(113
|
)
|
|
|
259
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(l) Net
periodic pension cost for 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Overfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
|
pension
|
|
|
pension
|
|
|
other
|
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
benefits
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(362
|
)
|
|
|
(195
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Net transition obligation/(asset) amortization
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net prior service cost/(credit) amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net actuarial loss/(gain) amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(78
|
)
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 Long-term
incentive compensation plan
In 2008, the Board
of Directors approved a long-term incentive compensation plan,
which was implemented in April 2008, over a three-year cycle
(2008 to 2010).
F-31
Under the terms of
the plan, the participants, restricted to certain executives,
may elect to allocate part of their annual bonus to the plan.
The allocation is applied to purchase preferred shares of Vale,
through a predefined financial institution, at market conditions
and with no benefit provided by Vale.
The shares purchased
by each executive are unrestricted and may, at the
participants discretion, be sold at any time. However, the
shares must be held for a three-year period and the executive
must be continually employed by Vale during that period. The
participant then becomes entitled to receive from Vale, a cash
payment equivalent to the total amount of shares held, based on
market rates.
We account for the
compensation cost provided to our executives under this
long-term incentive compensation plan, following the
requirements of FAS 123(R) Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation. Liabilities are measured at each reporting
date at fair value, based on market rates. Compensation costs
incurred are recognized, over the defined three-year vesting
period. At December 2008, we recognized a long-term liability of
US$7, relating to 711,005 shares, through the Statements of
Income.
20 Commitments
and contingencies
|
|
(a)
|
We provided certain
guarantees on behalf of the Goro Project pursuant to which we
guaranteed payments due from Goro of up to a maximum amount of
US$100 (Maximum Amount) in connection with an
indemnity. We also provided additional guarantees covering the
amounts payable by Goro regarding (a) amounts exceeding the
Maximum Amount in connection with the indemnity and
(b) certain other amounts under lease agreements.
|
Sumic Nickel
Netherlands B.V. Sumic, a 21% shareholder of Goro,
has a put option to sell to Vale Inco 25%, 50% or 100% of its
share in Goro. The put option can be exercised if the defined
cost of the initial Goro project exceeds US$4,200 at project
rates and an agreement cannot be reached on how to proceed with
the project.
We provided
guarantees covering certain termination payments by Goro to a
supplier under an electricity supply agreement (ESA)
entered into in October 2004 for the Goro nickel-cobalt project.
The amount of the termination payments guaranteed depends upon a
number of factors, including whether any termination of the ESA
occurs as a result of a default by Goro and the date of such
early termination. If Goro defaults under the ESA prior to the
anticipated start date for electricity supply, the termination
payment, which currently is at its maximum amount, would be
145 million. Once the supply of electricity under the
ESA to the project begins, the guaranteed amounts will decrease
over the life of the ESA.
|
|
(b)
|
We and our
subsidiaries are defendants in numerous legal actions in the
normal course of business. Based on the advice of our legal
counsel, management believes that the amounts recognized are
sufficient to cover probable losses in connection with such
actions.
|
The provision for
contingencies and the related judicial deposits are composed as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
December 31,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Provision for
|
|
Judicial
|
|
Provision for
|
|
Judicial
|
|
|
contingencies
|
|
deposits
|
|
contingencies
|
|
deposits
|
|
Labor and social security claims
|
|
458
|
|
378
|
|
519
|
|
372
|
Civil claims
|
|
386
|
|
242
|
|
311
|
|
135
|
Tax-related actions
|
|
828
|
|
518
|
|
1,605
|
|
613
|
Others
|
|
13
|
|
3
|
|
18
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,685
|
|
1,141
|
|
2,453
|
|
1,124
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-32
Labor- and social
security-related actions principally comprise claims by
Brazilian employees and former employees for (i) payment of
time spent traveling from their residences to the work-place,
(ii) additional health and safety related payments and
(iii) various other matters, often in connection with
disputes about the amount of indemnities paid upon dismissal and
the one-third extra holiday pay.
Civil actions
principally related to claims made against us by contractors in
Brazil in connection with losses alleged to have been incurred
by them as a result of various past government economic plans
during which full inflation indexation of contracts was not
permitted, as well as for accidents and land appropriations
disputes.
Tax-related actions
principally comprise challenges initiated by us, on certain
taxes on revenues and value-added taxes and uncertain tax
positions. We continue to vigorously pursue our interests in all
the above actions but recognize that we probably will incur some
losses in the final instance, for which we have made provisions.
Judicial deposits
are made by us following the court requirements, in order to be
entitled to either initiate or continue a legal action. These
amounts are released to us, upon receipt of a final favorable
outcome from the legal action; in the case of an unfavorable
outcome, the deposits are transferred to the prevailing party.
Contingencies
settled in 2008, 2007 and 2006 totaled US$148, US$331, US$424,
respectively. Provisions recognized in the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, totaled US$213, US$364,
US$439, respectively, classified as other operating expenses.
During 2008, we reversed a provision of US$300 previously
recognized, in connection with a favorable decision obtained for
a process regarding income tax.
In addition to the
contingencies for which we have made provisions, we are
defendants in claims where in our opinion, and based on the
advice of our legal counsel, the likelihood of loss is possible
but not probable, in the total amount of US$2,476 at
December 31, 2008, and for which no provision has been made
(2007 US$2,381).
|
|
(c)
|
At the time of our
privatization in 1997, we issued shareholder revenue interest
instruments known in Brazil as debentures participativas
(debentures) to our then-existing shareholders,
including the Brazilian government. The terms of the debentures,
were set to ensure that our pre-privatization shareholders,
including the Brazilian government, would participate alongside
us in potential future financial benefits that we could be able
to derive from exploiting our mineral resources.
|
In preparation for
the issuance of the debentures, we issued series B
preferred shares on a one-for-one basis to all holders of our
common shares and series A preferred shares. We then
exchanged all of the series B shares for the debentures at par
value. The debentures are not redeemable or convertible, and do
not trade on a stapled basis or otherwise with our common or
preferred shares. During 2002 we registered the debentures with
the Brazilian Securities Commission (CVM) in order
to permit trading.
Under the terms of
the debentures, holders will have the right to receive
semi-annual payments equal to an agreed percentage of our net
revenues (revenues less value-added tax) from certain identified
mineral resources that we owned as of May 1997, to the extent
that we exceed defined threshold production volumes of these
resources, and from the sale of mineral rights that we owned as
of May 1997. Our obligation to make payments to the holders will
cease when the relevant mineral resources are exhausted at which
time we are required to repay the original par value plus
accrued interest.
F-33
The table below
summarizes the amounts we will be required to pay under the
debentures based on the net revenues we earn from the identified
mineral resources and the sale of mineral rights.
|
|
|
|
|
Area
|
|
Mineral
|
|
Required payments
by Vale
|
|
Southeastern System
|
|
Iron ore
|
|
1.8% of net revenue, after total sales from May 1997 exceeds 1.7
billion tons.
|
Northern System
|
|
Iron ore
|
|
1.8% of net revenue, after total sales from May 1997 exceeds 1.2
billion tons.
|
Pojuca, Andorinhas, Liberdade and Sossego
|
|
Gold and copper
|
|
2.5% of net revenue from the beginning of commercialization.
|
Igarapé Bahia and Alemão
|
|
Gold and copper
|
|
2.5% of net revenue, after total sales from May 1997 exceeds 70
tons of gold.
|
Other areas, excluding Carajás/Serra Leste
|
|
Gold
|
|
2.5% of net revenue.
|
Other areas owned as of May 1997
|
|
Other minerals
|
|
1% of net revenue, 4 years after the beginning of the
commercialization.
|
All areas
|
|
Sale of mineral rights owned as of May 1997
|
|
1% of the sales price.
|
In September 2008
and April 2008, we paid remuneration on these debentures of US$6
and US$5, respectively. During 2007, we paid a total of US$11.
|
|
(d)
|
We are committed
under a take-or-pay agreement to purchase approximately 32,300
metric tons of bauxite from Mineração Rio do Norte
S.A. MRN at a formula driven price, calculated based
on the current London Metal Exchange LME quotation
for aluminum. Based on a market price of US$32,26 per metric ton
as of December 31, 2008, this arrangement represents the
following total commitment per metric ton as of
December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
281
|
2010
|
|
191
|
2011
|
|
187
|
2012
|
|
190
|
2013
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,041
|
|
|
|
(e) Description
of leasing arrangements
Part of our railroad
operations includes leased facilities. The
30-year
lease, renewable for an additional 30 years, expires in
August 2026 and is classified as an operating lease. At the end
of the lease term, we are required to return the concession and
the lease assets. In most cases, management expects that in the
normal course of business, leases will be renewed.
The following is a
schedule by year of future minimum rental payments required
under the railroad operating leases that have initial or
remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of
December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
Year ending
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
53
|
|
2010
|
|
|
53
|
|
2011
|
|
|
53
|
|
2012
|
|
|
54
|
|
2013 thereafter
|
|
|
714
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum payments required
|
|
|
927
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-34
The total expenses
of operating leases for the years ended December 31, 2008,
2007 and 2006 was US$53, US$62 and US$48, respectively.
During 2008, we
leased four pelletizing plants that were previously operated by
the joint ventures that own them, Nibrasco, Itabrasco and
Kobrasco. The lease terms are from 5 to 30 years.
The following is a
schedule by year of future minimum rental payments required
under the pellet plant operating leases that have initial or
remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of
December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
Year ending
December 31:
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
81
|
2010
|
|
81
|
2011
|
|
81
|
2012
|
|
81
|
2013 thereafter
|
|
987
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
1,311
|
|
|
|
(f) Asset
retirement obligations
We use various
judgments and assumptions when measuring our asset retirement
obligations.
Changes in
circumstances, law or technology may affect our estimates and we
periodically review the amounts accrued and adjust them as
necessary. Our accruals do not reflect unasserted claims because
we are currently not aware of any such issues. Also the amounts
provided are not reduced by any potential recoveries under cost
sharing, insurance or indemnification arrangements because such
recoveries are considered uncertain.
The changes in the
provisions for asset retirement obligations are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Beginning of period
|
|
|
975
|
|
|
|
676
|
|
Accretion expense
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
Liabilities settled in the current period
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
Revisions in estimated cash flows
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
83
|
|
Cumulative translation adjustment
|
|
|
(198
|
)
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period
|
|
|
887
|
|
|
|
975
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 Other
expenses
The line item
Other operating expenses totaled US$1,254 in 2008
(US$607 in 2007). During the last quarter of 2008, we recognized
certain expenses considered to be one-off events which
substantially caused the increase in 2008 as compared to 2007.
The most significant items recognized during the last quarter of
2008 in this respect were: (i) a US$204 expense relating to
additional payment relating to tax assessments on transportation
services, (ii) inventory market value write-down of US$77,
and (iii) write-off of intangible asset (patent right) in
the amount of US$65.
22 Fair
value disclosure of financial assets and liabilities
In September 2006,
the FASB issued SFAS 157, Fair Value
Measurements, which defines fair value, establishes a
framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about
fair value measurements. SFAS 157 does not require any new
fair value measurements, but provides guidance on how to measure
fair value by providing a fair value hierarchy used to classify
the source of the information.
F-35
In February 2007,
the FASB issued SFAS 159, The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities Including
an amendment of FASB Statement 115. SFAS 159 permits
the choice of measuring financial instruments and certain other
items at fair value. SFAS 159 is effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007.
On January 1,
2008, the Company adopted SFAS 159 and elected not to apply
the provisions of SFAS 159 to its eligible financial assets
and financial liabilities on the date of adoption. Accordingly,
the initial application of both SFAS 157 and SFAS 159
had no effect on the Company.
Under SFAS 157,
the inputs used to measure fair value must be classified into
one of three levels as follows:
Level 1
Quoted prices in an active market for identical assets or
liabilities;
Level 2
Observable inputs other than Level 1, quoted prices for
similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices
for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that
are not active, and model-derived prices whose inputs are
observable or whose significant value drivers are
observable; and
Level 3
Assets and liabilities whose significant value drivers are
unobservable. The valuation of assets measured at fair value in
the Companys Consolidated Balance Sheet at
December 31, 2008 is summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value
measurements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted prices
in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
active markets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for identical
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
Fair value
|
|
|
assets or
|
|
|
Significant
other
|
|
|
unobservable
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
liabilities,
|
|
|
observable
|
|
|
inputs
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(Level
1)
|
|
|
inputs (Level
2)
|
|
|
(Level
3)
|
|
|
Available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
2,408
|
|
|
|
2,408
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized losses on derivatives
|
|
|
(539
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(539
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other financial liabilities
|
|
|
(380
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(380
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Our long-term debt
is reported at amortized cost, however its fair value
measurement at December 31, 2008 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
amount
|
|
Fair
value
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Long-term debt (less interests)
|
|
17,857
|
|
16,635
|
|
7,833
|
|
8,802
|
|
|
The carrying amount
of our current financial instruments generally approximates fair
market value because of the short-term maturity or frequent
repricing of these instruments.
The market value of
our listed long-term investments, where available, is disclosed
in Note 12.
23 Segment
and geographical information
We adopt
SFAS 131 Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise
and Related Information with respect to the information we
present about our operating segments. SFAS 131 introduced a
management approach concept for reporting segment
information, whereby such information is required to be reported
on the basis that the chief decision-maker uses internally for
evaluating segment performance and deciding how to allocate
resources to segments. We analyze our segment information on
aggregated and disaggregated basis as follows:
Ferrous
products comprises iron ore mining and pellet
production, as well as our Brazilian Northern and Southern
transportation systems, including railroads, ports and
terminals, as they pertain to mining operations. Manganese
mining and ferroalloys are also included in this segment.
F-36
Non-ferrous
comprises the production of non-ferrous minerals, including
nickel (co-products and by-products), potash, kaolin, copper and
aluminum comprises aluminum trading activities,
alumina refining and aluminum metal smelting and investments in
joint ventures and affiliates engaged in bauxite mining.
Logistics
comprises our transportation systems as they pertain to the
operation of our ships, ports and railroads for third-party
cargos.
Others
comprises our investments in joint ventures and affiliates
engaged in other businesses.
Information
presented to senior management with respect to the performance
of each segment is generally derived directly from the
accounting records maintained in accordance with accounting
practices adopted in Brazil together with certain minor
inter-segment allocations.
F-37
Consolidated net
income and principal assets are reconciled as follows:
Results by
segment before eliminations (aggregated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the
year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) Non
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) Non
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) Non
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ferrous
|
|
|
ferrous
|
|
|
Aluminum
|
|
|
Logistics
|
|
|
Others
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Ferrous
|
|
|
ferrous
|
|
|
Aluminum
|
|
|
Logistics
|
|
|
Others
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Ferrous
|
|
|
ferrous
|
|
|
Aluminum
|
|
|
Logistics
|
|
|
Others
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RESULTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross revenues - Foreign
|
|
|
33,369
|
|
|
|
9,752
|
|
|
|
3,916
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
588
|
|
|
|
(15,842
|
)
|
|
|
31,834
|
|
|
|
21,126
|
|
|
|
13,338
|
|
|
|
3,506
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
242
|
|
|
|
(10,437
|
)
|
|
|
27,836
|
|
|
|
15,729
|
|
|
|
4,199
|
|
|
|
3,125
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
(7,029
|
)
|
|
|
16,145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross revenues - Domestic
|
|
|
4,342
|
|
|
|
491
|
|
|
|
850
|
|
|
|
1,640
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
(882
|
)
|
|
|
6,675
|
|
|
|
3,865
|
|
|
|
487
|
|
|
|
751
|
|
|
|
1,519
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(1,344
|
)
|
|
|
5,279
|
|
|
|
2,738
|
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
474
|
|
|
|
1,373
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(651
|
)
|
|
|
4,218
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost and expenses
|
|
|
(24,143
|
)
|
|
|
(5,838
|
)
|
|
|
(3,948
|
)
|
|
|
(1,097
|
)
|
|
|
(617
|
)
|
|
|
16,724
|
|
|
|
(18,919
|
)
|
|
|
(16,882
|
)
|
|
|
(7,301
|
)
|
|
|
(3,307
|
)
|
|
|
(983
|
)
|
|
|
(310
|
)
|
|
|
11,781
|
|
|
|
(17,002
|
)
|
|
|
(12,004
|
)
|
|
|
(3,301
|
)
|
|
|
(2,597
|
)
|
|
|
(970
|
)
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
|
|
7,680
|
|
|
|
(11,248
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
(338
|
)
|
|
|
(380
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(101
|
)
|
|
|
(266
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,085
|
)
|
|
|
(175
|
)
|
|
|
(329
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
(190
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(733
|
)
|
|
|
(123
|
)
|
|
|
(166
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(182
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(481
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
(1,021
|
)
|
|
|
(1,452
|
)
|
|
|
(171
|
)
|
|
|
(128
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,807
|
)
|
|
|
(917
|
)
|
|
|
(1,039
|
)
|
|
|
(110
|
)
|
|
|
(103
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,186
|
)
|
|
|
(632
|
)
|
|
|
(219
|
)
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(997
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(950
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(950
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
12,209
|
|
|
|
1,623
|
|
|
|
647
|
|
|
|
365
|
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,748
|
|
|
|
7,017
|
|
|
|
5,156
|
|
|
|
840
|
|
|
|
455
|
|
|
|
(274
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,194
|
|
|
|
5,708
|
|
|
|
790
|
|
|
|
936
|
|
|
|
384
|
|
|
|
(181
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,637
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial income
|
|
|
3,048
|
|
|
|
768
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(3,255
|
)
|
|
|
602
|
|
|
|
2,514
|
|
|
|
578
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
(3,848
|
)
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
789
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(609
|
)
|
|
|
327
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial expenses
|
|
|
(3,479
|
)
|
|
|
(1,431
|
)
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
3,255
|
|
|
|
(1,765
|
)
|
|
|
(4,008
|
)
|
|
|
(1,152
|
)
|
|
|
(166
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
2,848
|
|
|
|
(2,509
|
)
|
|
|
(1,526
|
)
|
|
|
(172
|
)
|
|
|
(107
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
609
|
|
|
|
(1,222
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains (losses) on derivatives, net
|
|
|
(719
|
)
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(812
|
)
|
|
|
854
|
|
|
|
(90
|
)
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
917
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
(187
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(116
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Froeign exchange and monetary gains (losses), net
|
|
|
767
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
(275
|
)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(106
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
364
|
|
|
|
2,302
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,559
|
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
529
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale if investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
237
|
|
|
|
459
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
777
|
|
|
|
443
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
674
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in results of affiliates and joint ventures and change in
provision for losses on equity investments
|
|
|
543
|
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
794
|
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
595
|
|
|
|
312
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
710
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
(626
|
)
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(535
|
)
|
|
|
(1,959
|
)
|
|
|
(1,005
|
)
|
|
|
(231
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,201
|
)
|
|
|
(976
|
)
|
|
|
(250
|
)
|
|
|
(187
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,432
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Monthly interests
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(151
|
)
|
|
|
(105
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(258
|
)
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
(444
|
)
|
|
|
(326
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(802
|
)
|
|
|
(157
|
)
|
|
|
(190
|
)
|
|
|
(232
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(579
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
12,491
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
|
484
|
|
|
|
(128
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,218
|
|
|
|
6,990
|
|
|
|
3,226
|
|
|
|
552
|
|
|
|
777
|
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,825
|
|
|
|
4,784
|
|
|
|
575
|
|
|
|
438
|
|
|
|
471
|
|
|
|
260
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,528
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales classified by geographic destination
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign market
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
America, except United States
|
|
|
1,805
|
|
|
|
1,051
|
|
|
|
1,164
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,201
|
)
|
|
|
2,820
|
|
|
|
1,449
|
|
|
|
1,555
|
|
|
|
850
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,026
|
)
|
|
|
2,851
|
|
|
|
1,249
|
|
|
|
438
|
|
|
|
726
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(823
|
)
|
|
|
1,620
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
648
|
|
|
|
1,789
|
|
|
|
412
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
(392
|
)
|
|
|
2,467
|
|
|
|
432
|
|
|
|
2,462
|
|
|
|
308
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
(318
|
)
|
|
|
2,965
|
|
|
|
506
|
|
|
|
450
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
(237
|
)
|
|
|
868
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
11,215
|
|
|
|
2,598
|
|
|
|
1,534
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
(5,933
|
)
|
|
|
9,449
|
|
|
|
6,823
|
|
|
|
2,589
|
|
|
|
1,606
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,716
|
)
|
|
|
7,335
|
|
|
|
5,465
|
|
|
|
1,020
|
|
|
|
1,346
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,667
|
)
|
|
|
5,183
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Middle East/Africa/Oceania
|
|
|
1,904
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
(952
|
)
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
827
|
|
|
|
396
|
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
(412
|
)
|
|
|
1,114
|
|
|
|
767
|
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(239
|
)
|
|
|
1,010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
4,516
|
|
|
|
1,293
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
(1,918
|
)
|
|
|
4,737
|
|
|
|
2,131
|
|
|
|
2,041
|
|
|
|
584
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(929
|
)
|
|
|
3,827
|
|
|
|
1,779
|
|
|
|
523
|
|
|
|
548
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(662
|
)
|
|
|
2,188
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
China
|
|
|
9,743
|
|
|
|
864
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(3,949
|
)
|
|
|
6,706
|
|
|
|
7,570
|
|
|
|
1,457
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,168
|
)
|
|
|
5,863
|
|
|
|
4,781
|
|
|
|
499
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,716
|
)
|
|
|
3,706
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia, other than Japan and China
|
|
|
3,538
|
|
|
|
1,937
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
(1,497
|
)
|
|
|
4,155
|
|
|
|
1,894
|
|
|
|
2,838
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(868
|
)
|
|
|
3,881
|
|
|
|
1,182
|
|
|
|
1,050
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(684
|
)
|
|
|
1,570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,369
|
|
|
|
9,752
|
|
|
|
3,916
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
588
|
|
|
|
(15,842
|
)
|
|
|
31,834
|
|
|
|
21,126
|
|
|
|
13,338
|
|
|
|
3,506
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
242
|
|
|
|
(10,437
|
)
|
|
|
27,836
|
|
|
|
15,729
|
|
|
|
4,198
|
|
|
|
3,125
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
(7,028
|
)
|
|
|
16,145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic market
|
|
|
4,342
|
|
|
|
491
|
|
|
|
850
|
|
|
|
1,640
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
(882
|
)
|
|
|
6,675
|
|
|
|
3,865
|
|
|
|
487
|
|
|
|
751
|
|
|
|
1,519
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(1,344
|
)
|
|
|
5,279
|
|
|
|
2,738
|
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
474
|
|
|
|
1,373
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(651
|
)
|
|
|
4,218
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,711
|
|
|
|
10,243
|
|
|
|
4,766
|
|
|
|
1,691
|
|
|
|
822
|
|
|
|
(16,724
|
)
|
|
|
38,509
|
|
|
|
24,991
|
|
|
|
13,825
|
|
|
|
4,257
|
|
|
|
1,580
|
|
|
|
243
|
|
|
|
(11,781
|
)
|
|
|
33,115
|
|
|
|
18,467
|
|
|
|
4,475
|
|
|
|
3,599
|
|
|
|
1,440
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
(7,679
|
)
|
|
|
20,363
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-38
Operating
segment after eliminations (disaggregated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the
year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property,
|
|
|
Addition to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
plant and
|
|
|
property,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
equipment,
|
|
|
plant and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
net and
|
|
|
equipment,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Cost and
|
|
|
|
|
|
depletion and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
intangible
|
|
|
net and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
added
tax
|
|
|
revenues
|
|
|
expenses
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
amortization
|
|
|
Impairment
|
|
|
income
|
|
|
assets
|
|
|
intangible
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
Ferrous
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iron ore
|
|
|
15,102
|
|
|
|
2,673
|
|
|
|
17,775
|
|
|
|
(364
|
)
|
|
|
17,411
|
|
|
|
(6,547
|
)
|
|
|
10,864
|
|
|
|
(876
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,988
|
|
|
|
14,595
|
|
|
|
3,645
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
Pellets
|
|
|
3,481
|
|
|
|
820
|
|
|
|
4,301
|
|
|
|
(189
|
)
|
|
|
4,112
|
|
|
|
(2,394
|
)
|
|
|
1,718
|
|
|
|
(112
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,606
|
|
|
|
645
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
708
|
|
Manganese
|
|
|
221
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ferroalloys
|
|
|
704
|
|
|
|
507
|
|
|
|
1,211
|
|
|
|
(128
|
)
|
|
|
1,083
|
|
|
|
(457
|
)
|
|
|
626
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
604
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pig iron
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,654
|
|
|
|
4,045
|
|
|
|
23,699
|
|
|
|
(696
|
)
|
|
|
23,003
|
|
|
|
(9,542
|
)
|
|
|
13,461
|
|
|
|
(1,018
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,443
|
|
|
|
15,568
|
|
|
|
3,929
|
|
|
|
755
|
|
Non ferrous
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nickel and other products
|
|
|
7,785
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
7,829
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,829
|
|
|
|
(4,425
|
)
|
|
|
3,404
|
|
|
|
(1,323
|
)
|
|
|
(950
|
)
|
|
|
1,131
|
|
|
|
21,729
|
|
|
|
2,813
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
Potash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
(120
|
)
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kaolin
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
(213
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copper concentrate
|
|
|
787
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
893
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
871
|
|
|
|
(683
|
)
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
3,543
|
|
|
|
283
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum products
|
|
|
2,681
|
|
|
|
361
|
|
|
|
3.042
|
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
2,976
|
|
|
|
(2,288
|
)
|
|
|
688
|
|
|
|
(172
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
516
|
|
|
|
3,831
|
|
|
|
440
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,420
|
|
|
|
848
|
|
|
|
12,268
|
|
|
|
(113
|
)
|
|
|
12,155
|
|
|
|
(7,729
|
)
|
|
|
4,426
|
|
|
|
(1,623
|
)
|
|
|
(950
|
)
|
|
|
1,853
|
|
|
|
29,461
|
|
|
|
3,585
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logistics
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Railroads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,303
|
|
|
|
1,303
|
|
|
|
(205
|
)
|
|
|
1,098
|
|
|
|
(749
|
)
|
|
|
349
|
|
|
|
(103
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
1,431
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
326
|
|
Ports
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
304
|
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
|
(198
|
)
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
1,441
|
|
|
|
242
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ships
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
374
|
|
|
|
343
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
1,596
|
|
|
|
1,607
|
|
|
|
(244
|
)
|
|
|
1,363
|
|
|
|
(947
|
)
|
|
|
416
|
|
|
|
(129
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
|
3,246
|
|
|
|
706
|
|
|
|
420
|
|
Others
|
|
|
749
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
935
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
905
|
|
|
|
(703
|
)
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
1,054
|
|
|
|
752
|
|
|
|
1,040
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,834
|
|
|
|
6,675
|
|
|
|
38,509
|
|
|
|
(1,083
|
)
|
|
|
37,426
|
|
|
|
(18,921
|
)
|
|
|
18,505
|
|
|
|
(2,807
|
)
|
|
|
(950
|
)
|
|
|
14,748
|
|
|
|
49,329
|
|
|
|
8,972
|
|
|
|
2,408
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*)
|
|
Includes nickel
co-products (copper, precious metals, cobalt and others).
|
F-39
Operating
segment after eliminations (disaggregated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the
year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addition to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant
and
|
|
|
property, plant
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
depletion and
|
|
|
|
|
|
equipment, net
and
|
|
|
equipment, net
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
added
tax
|
|
|
Net
revenues
|
|
|
Cost and
expenses
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
amortization
|
|
|
Operating
income
|
|
|
intangible
assets
|
|
|
intangible
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
Ferrous
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iron ore
|
|
|
9,873
|
|
|
|
2,035
|
|
|
|
11,908
|
|
|
|
(286
|
)
|
|
|
11,622
|
|
|
|
(4,520
|
)
|
|
|
7,102
|
|
|
|
(777
|
)
|
|
|
6,325
|
|
|
|
17,031
|
|
|
|
2,496
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
Pellets
|
|
|
2,151
|
|
|
|
587
|
|
|
|
2,738
|
|
|
|
(132
|
)
|
|
|
2,606
|
|
|
|
(1,860
|
)
|
|
|
746
|
|
|
|
(87
|
)
|
|
|
659
|
|
|
|
754
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
741
|
|
Manganese
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ferroalloys
|
|
|
445
|
|
|
|
274
|
|
|
|
719
|
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
|
|
649
|
|
|
|
(442
|
)
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pig iron
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,598
|
|
|
|
2,917
|
|
|
|
15,515
|
|
|
|
(493
|
)
|
|
|
15,022
|
|
|
|
(6,945
|
)
|
|
|
8,077
|
|
|
|
(901
|
)
|
|
|
7,176
|
|
|
|
18,230
|
|
|
|
2,646
|
|
|
|
801
|
|
Non ferrous
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nickel and other products(*)
|
|
|
11,664
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
11,789
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,789
|
|
|
|
(6,077
|
)
|
|
|
5,712
|
|
|
|
(927
|
)
|
|
|
4,785
|
|
|
|
23,668
|
|
|
|
2,088
|
|
|
|
299
|
|
Potash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
(108
|
)
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kaolin
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
(228
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copper concentrate
|
|
|
663
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
802
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
772
|
|
|
|
(456
|
)
|
|
|
316
|
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
1,841
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum products
|
|
|
2,418
|
|
|
|
304
|
|
|
|
2,722
|
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
2,656
|
|
|
|
(1,717
|
)
|
|
|
939
|
|
|
|
(111
|
)
|
|
|
828
|
|
|
|
4,448
|
|
|
|
856
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,947
|
|
|
|
782
|
|
|
|
15,729
|
|
|
|
(115
|
)
|
|
|
15,614
|
|
|
|
(8,586
|
)
|
|
|
7,028
|
|
|
|
(1,158
|
)
|
|
|
5,870
|
|
|
|
30,470
|
|
|
|
3,193
|
|
|
|
483
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logistics
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Railroads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,220
|
|
|
|
1,220
|
|
|
|
(199
|
)
|
|
|
1,021
|
|
|
|
(636
|
)
|
|
|
385
|
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
|
|
297
|
|
|
|
1,735
|
|
|
|
491
|
|
|
|
342
|
|
Ports
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
254
|
|
|
|
267
|
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
221
|
|
|
|
(177
|
)
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
1,371
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ships
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
1,495
|
|
|
|
1,525
|
|
|
|
(248
|
)
|
|
|
1,277
|
|
|
|
(857
|
)
|
|
|
420
|
|
|
|
(113
|
)
|
|
|
307
|
|
|
|
3,142
|
|
|
|
605
|
|
|
|
449
|
|
Others
|
|
|
261
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
|
(474
|
)
|
|
|
(145
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(159
|
)
|
|
|
2,783
|
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
|
1,189
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,836
|
|
|
|
5,279
|
|
|
|
33,115
|
|
|
|
(873
|
)
|
|
|
32,242
|
|
|
|
(16,862
|
)
|
|
|
15,380
|
|
|
|
(2,186
|
)
|
|
|
13,194
|
|
|
|
54,625
|
|
|
|
6,651
|
|
|
|
2,922
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*)
|
|
Includes nickel
co-products (copper, precious metals, cobalt and others).
|
F-40
Operating
segment after eliminations (disaggregated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the
year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addition to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant
and
|
|
|
property, plant
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
depletion and
|
|
|
|
|
|
equipment, net
and
|
|
|
equipment, net
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
added
tax
|
|
|
Net
revenues
|
|
|
Cost and
expenses
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
amortization
|
|
|
Operating
income
|
|
|
intangible
assets
|
|
|
intangible
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
Ferrous
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iron ore
|
|
|
8,167
|
|
|
|
1,860
|
|
|
|
10,027
|
|
|
|
(271
|
)
|
|
|
9,756
|
|
|
|
(4,060
|
)
|
|
|
5,696
|
|
|
|
(528
|
)
|
|
|
5,168
|
|
|
|
13,235
|
|
|
|
2,616
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
Pellets
|
|
|
1,590
|
|
|
|
389
|
|
|
|
1,979
|
|
|
|
(86
|
)
|
|
|
1,893
|
|
|
|
(1,210
|
)
|
|
|
683
|
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
630
|
|
|
|
593
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
529
|
|
Manganese
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ferroalloys
|
|
|
342
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
508
|
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
465
|
|
|
|
(443
|
)
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,138
|
|
|
|
2,431
|
|
|
|
12,569
|
|
|
|
(403
|
)
|
|
|
12,166
|
|
|
|
(5,810
|
)
|
|
|
6,356
|
|
|
|
(604
|
)
|
|
|
5,752
|
|
|
|
14,079
|
|
|
|
2,779
|
|
|
|
577
|
|
Non ferrous
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nickel and other products(*)
|
|
|
2,786
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
2,802
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,802
|
|
|
|
(2,267
|
)
|
|
|
535
|
|
|
|
(124
|
)
|
|
|
411
|
|
|
|
17,193
|
|
|
|
483
|
|
|
|
222
|
|
Potash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kaolin
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
|
(182
|
)
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
249
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copper concentrate
|
|
|
690
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
779
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
759
|
|
|
|
(246
|
)
|
|
|
513
|
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
464
|
|
|
|
1,386
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum products
|
|
|
2,220
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
2,381
|
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
2,344
|
|
|
|
(1,354
|
)
|
|
|
990
|
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
925
|
|
|
|
2,829
|
|
|
|
749
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,884
|
|
|
|
439
|
|
|
|
6,323
|
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
|
|
6,249
|
|
|
|
(4,133
|
)
|
|
|
2,116
|
|
|
|
(288
|
)
|
|
|
1,828
|
|
|
|
21,835
|
|
|
|
1,417
|
|
|
|
386
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logistics
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Railroads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,011
|
|
|
|
1,011
|
|
|
|
(177
|
)
|
|
|
834
|
|
|
|
(488
|
)
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
|
|
274
|
|
|
|
720
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
222
|
|
Ports
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
261
|
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
(137
|
)
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
222
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ships
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
1,309
|
|
|
|
1,376
|
|
|
|
(229
|
)
|
|
|
1,147
|
|
|
|
(722
|
)
|
|
|
425
|
|
|
|
(93
|
)
|
|
|
332
|
|
|
|
987
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
222
|
|
Others
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
(352
|
)
|
|
|
(263
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(275
|
)
|
|
|
1,106
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
1,168
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,145
|
|
|
|
4,218
|
|
|
|
20,363
|
|
|
|
(712
|
)
|
|
|
19,651
|
|
|
|
(11,017
|
)
|
|
|
8,634
|
|
|
|
(997
|
)
|
|
|
7,637
|
|
|
|
38,077
|
|
|
|
4,431
|
|
|
|
2,353
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*)
|
|
Includes nickel
co-products (copper, precious metals, cobalt and others).
|
F-41
24 Related-party
transactions
Balances from
transactions with major related parties are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
December 31,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
Assets
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
AFFILIATED COMPANIES AND JOINT VENTURES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Companhia Hispano-Brasileira de
Pelotização HISPANOBRÁS
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
46
|
Companhia Ítalo-Brasileira de
Pelotização ITABRASCO
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
49
|
Companhia Nipo-Brasileira de Pelotização
NIBRASCO
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
30
|
Companhia Coreano-Brasileira de
Pelotização KOBRASCO
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
13
|
Baovale Mineração S.A.
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
41
|
Usinas Siderúrgicas de Minas Gerais S.A.
USIMINAS
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
Minas da Serra Geral S.A. MSG
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
MRS Logística S.A.
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
35
|
Mineração Rio Norte S.A.
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
Samarco Mineração S.A.
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
0
|
Korea Nickel Corporation
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
Mitsui & Co., Ltd.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
Others
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
505
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
414
|
|
|
345
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term
|
|
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These balances are
included in the following balance sheet classifications:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
281
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and advances to related parties
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and advances to related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suppliers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
302
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
281
|
|
Loans from related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
505
|
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-42
Income and expenses
from the principal transactions and financial operations carried
out with major related parties are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended of
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
Companhia Nipo-Brasileira de Pelotização
NIBRASCO
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
393
|
|
|
|
386
|
|
|
|
328
|
|
|
|
363
|
|
|
|
292
|
|
Samarco Mineração S.A.
|
|
|
259
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
|
Companhia Ítalo-Brasileira de
Pelotização ITABRASCO
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
233
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
Companhia Hispano-Brasileira de
Pelotização HISPANOBRÁS
|
|
|
342
|
|
|
|
378
|
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
Companhia Coreano-Brasileira de
Pelotização KOBRASCO
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
191
|
|
Usinas Siderúrgicas de Minas Gerais S.A.
USIMINAS
|
|
|
651
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
442
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
410
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valesul Aluminio S.A.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mineração Rio Norte S.A.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
249
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
232
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
Gulf Industrial Investment Company GIIC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
MRS Logística S.A.
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
829
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
593
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
516
|
|
Others
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,741
|
|
|
|
2,280
|
|
|
|
1,692
|
|
|
|
1,810
|
|
|
|
1,590
|
|
|
|
1,491
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These amounts are
included in the following statement of income line items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended of
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
Sales/cost of iron ore and pellets
|
|
|
1,698
|
|
|
|
1,369
|
|
|
|
1,649
|
|
|
|
960
|
|
|
|
1,553
|
|
|
|
712
|
|
Revenues/expense from logistical services
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
624
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
593
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
516
|
|
Sales/cost of aluminum products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
249
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
232
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
Financial income/expenses
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Others
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,741
|
|
|
|
2,280
|
|
|
|
1,692
|
|
|
|
1,810
|
|
|
|
1,590
|
|
|
|
1,491
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additionally, we
have loans payable to Mitsui & Co., Ltd., Banco
Nacional de Desenvolvimento Social and BNDES
Participações S.A. in the amounts of US$4, US$604 and
US$305, accruing with interest at market rates, which fall due
through 2013. We also maintain cash equivalent balances with
Banco Bradesco S.A. in the amount of US$18 at December 31,
2008.
25 Derivative
financial instruments
Risk management
policy
We consider the
effective management of risk a key objective to support our
growth strategy and financial flexibility. In furtherance of
this objective, the Board of Directors has established an
enterprise risk management policy and a risk management
committee. Under the policy, we measure, monitor, and manage
risk at the portfolio level, using a single framework, and
consider the natural diversification of our portfolio.
The risk management
committee is responsible to the assist our executive officers in
overseeing and reviewing information regarding our enterprise
risk management activities including the principles, significant
policies, risk management process and procedures and instruments
employed to manage risk. The risk management committee reports
periodically to the executive board how the risks have been
monitored, what are the most important risks and their impact on
our cash flows.
F-43
Any risk mitigation
strategy will only be implemented, whenever necessary, to
support our corporate strategy or to maintain our target level
of financial flexibility. The risk management policy and the
risk management norms, that complement the normatives of risk
management governance model, explicitly prohibit speculative
transactions with derivatives and require the diversification of
operations and counterparties.
Under SFAS 133
Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments and
Hedging Activities, as amended by SFAS 137 and
SFAS 138, we recognize all derivatives on our balance sheet
at fair value, and the gain or loss in fair value is included in
current earnings, unless designated as a cash flow hedge.
The main market
risks we face are interest rate risk, exchange rate risk and
product price risk. We manage some of these risks through the
use of derivative instruments. Our risk management activities
follow the risk management policy, which requires
diversification of transactions and counter-parties. We monitor
and evaluate our overall position regularly in order to evaluate
financial results and impact on our cash flow. We also
periodically review the credit limits and creditworthiness of
our hedging counter-parties.
Foreign exchange
and interest rate risk
Vales cash
flows are exposed to volatility of several different currencies.
While most of our product prices are indexed to
U.S. dollars, representing around 94% of the total revenue,
most of our costs, disbursements and investments are indexed to
currencies other than the U.S. dollar, mainly Brazilian
Reais and Canadian dollars.
Derivatives
instruments may be used in order to reduce Vales potential
cash flow volatility arising from the currencies mismatch
between the currencies under which the debt is denominated and
revenues are generated. Vales foreign exchange and
interest rate derivative portfolio consists, basically, of
interest rate swaps to convert floating cash flows in Brazilian
Reais to fixed or floating U.S. dollar cash flows, without
any leverage.
Vale is also exposed
to interest rate risks on loans and financings. Our
U.S. dollar denominated floating rate debt consists mainly
of loans including export pre-payments, commercial banks and
multilateral organizations loans. In general, our
U.S. dollars floating rate debt is subject to changes in
the LIBOR (London Interbank Offer Rate in U.S. dollars). To
mitigate the impact of the interest rate volatility on its cash
flows, Vale takes advantage of natural hedges resulting from the
positive correlation of metal prices and U.S. dollar
floating rates. When natural hedges are not present, we may opt
to realize the same effect by using financial instruments.
Our Real denominated
debt subject to floating interest rates are debentures, loans
obtained from Banco Nacional de Desenvolvimento Econômico e
Social (BNDES) and property and services acquisition financing
in the Brazilian market. These debts are mainly linked to CDI
and TJLP.
The swap
transactions entered into have settlement dates similar to the
interest and principal payment dates, taking into account the
liquidity restrictions of the market. At each settlement date,
the results on the swap transactions partially offset the impact
of the U.S. dollar/Brazilian Real exchange rate in our
obligations, contributing to a stable flow of cash disbursements
in U.S. dollars for interest
and/or
principal payment of our Real denominated debt.
In the event of an
appreciation (depreciation) of the Brazilian Real against the
U.S. dollar, the negative (positive) impact on our Real
denominated debt obligations (interest
and/or
principal payment) measured in U.S. dollars will be almost
totally offset by a positive (negative) effect from any existing
swap transaction, regardless of the U.S. dollar/Brazilian
Real exchange rate on the payment date.
We have other
exposures associated with our outstanding debt portfolio. In
order to reduce cash flow volatility associated with a financing
from KFW (Kreditanstalt Für Wiederaufbau) indexed to
F-44
Euribor, Vale
entered into a swap contract where the cash flows in Euros are
converted into cash flows in U.S. dollars.
Product price
risk
Vale is also exposed
to several market risks associated with global commodities
prices volatilities.
Currently,
derivative transactions entered into related to commodities
prices are nickel, aluminum, copper, gold platinum and natural
gas derivatives and all have the same purpose of mitigating
Vales cash flow volatility.
Nickel
The Company has purchased nickel future contracts in the London
Metal Exchange (LME), with the purpose of maintaining its
exposure to nickel price variation, regarding the fact that, in
some cases, the commodity is sold at a fixed price to some
customers. Vale has also sold nickel futures in the LME, in
order to minimize the risk of mismatch between the pricing on
the costs of intermediate products and finished goods.
Aluminum
In order to reduce cash flow volatility after Incos
acquisition when Vale increased its leverage, we entered in
aluminum hedging operations, which matured in December 2008.
Copper
Vale Inco Ltd., Vales wholly-owned subsidiary, makes use
of hedging to protect the price mismatch between the date of
copper scrap purchase and the date of selling the finished good.
Platinum-group
metals (PGMs) and other precious
metals
Transactions regarding gold and platinum are executed in order
to manage the risk associated with the volatility of these
commodities prices. Platinum and gold hedging transactions
matured in December 2008.
Natural
gas
Vale uses natural gas swap contracts to minimize the impact of
price fluctuation of this input cost in the cash flow.
In addition to the
contracts mentioned above, Vale Inco Ltd., Vales
wholly-owned subsidiary, has nickel concentrate and raw
materials purchase agreements, where there are provisions based
on nickel and copper future prices behavior. These provisions
are considered embedded derivatives.
There is also an
embedded derivative related to energy in our subsidiary Albras
on which we have no unrealized gain as of December 31, 2008
and US$17 as of December 31, 2007.
F-45
The asset
(liability) balances and the change in fair value of derivative
financial instruments are as follows (the quarterly information
is unaudited):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
rates
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(LIBOR)/
|
|
|
|
|
|
aluminum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currencies
|
|
|
Gold
|
|
|
area
|
|
|
Copper
|
|
|
Nickel
|
|
|
Platinum
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) at January 1, 2008
|
|
|
626
|
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
(188
|
)
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
322
|
|
Financial settlement
|
|
|
(394
|
)
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) in the period
|
|
|
(682
|
)
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(811
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes
|
|
|
(123
|
)
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
(573
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(541
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) at January 1, 2007
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
(318
|
)
|
|
|
(298
|
)
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(683
|
)
|
Financial settlement
|
|
|
(290
|
)
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) in the period
|
|
|
854
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
(129
|
)
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
917
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) at December 31,2007(*)
|
|
|
626
|
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
(188
|
)
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
322
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) at January 1, 2006
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
(210
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(259
|
)
|
Gain (loss) recognized upon consolidation of Inco
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(364
|
)
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
(311
|
)
|
Financial settlement
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(87
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) in the period
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(187
|
)
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(116
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
(318
|
)
|
|
|
(299
|
)
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(683
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*)
|
|
At December 31,
2007, US$5 was recorded in long-term liabilities.
|
Unrealized gains
(losses) in the period are included in our income statement
under the caption of Financial expenses and Foreign exchange and
monetary gains (losses), net.
Final maturity dates
for the above instruments are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Cross currency interest rate swaps
|
|
|
December 2019
|
|
Copper concentrate
|
|
|
March 2009
|
|
Nickel
|
|
|
March 2011
|
|
Under SFAS 133,
all derivatives, whether designated in hedging relationships or
not, are required to be recorded in the balance sheet at fair
value. A derivative must be designated in a hedging relationship
in order to qualify for hedge accounting. These requirements
include a determination of what portions of hedges are deemed to
be effective versus ineffective. In general, a hedging
relationship is effective when a change in the fair value of the
derivative is offset by an equal and opposite change in the fair
value of the underlying hedged item. In accordance with these
requirements, effectiveness tests are performed in order to
assess effectiveness and quantify ineffectiveness for all
designated hedges.
At December 31,
2008, we had no outstanding cash flow hedges. A cash flow hedge
is a hedge of the exposure to variability in expected future
cash flows that is attributable to a particular risk such as a
forecasted purchase or sale. If a derivative is designated as a
cash flow hedge, the effective portions of the changes in the
fair value of the derivative are recorded in other comprehensive
income and are recognized in earnings when the hedged item
affects earnings. Ineffective portions of changes in the fair
value of the derivatives designated as hedges are recognized
F-46
in earnings. If a
portion of a derivative contract is excluded for purposes of
effectiveness testing, such as time value, the value of such
excluded portion is included in earnings. At December 31,
2008, unrealized net losses in respect of derivative instruments
which were not qualified for hedge accounting amounted to
US$811. The unrealized net gain as of December 31, 2007
amounted to US$869.
26 Subsequent
events
On January 30,
2009 we entered into a purchase and sale agreement with Rio
Tinto Plc to acquire iron ore (in Brazil) and potash (in
Argentina and Canada) assets. The price to be paid for the iron
assets amounts to US$750, while the potash deposits will be
acquired for US$850.
F-47