e20vf
As filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on April 29, 2010
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 20-F
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended: December 31, 2009
Commission file number:
001-15030
VALE S.A.
(Exact name of Registrant as
specified in its charter)
Federative Republic of Brazil
(Jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
Fabio de Oliveira Barbosa, Chief
Financial Officer
fax: +55 21 3814 8820
Avenida Graça Aranha,
No. 26
20030-900
Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
(Address of principal
executive offices)
Securities registered or
to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
|
|
Name of Each Exchange on
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
Which Registered
|
|
Preferred class A shares of Vale, no par value per share
|
|
New York Stock Exchange*
|
American Depositary Shares (evidenced by American Depositary
Receipts), each representing one preferred class A share of
Vale
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
Common shares of Vale, no par value per share
|
|
New York Stock Exchange*
|
American Depositary Shares (evidenced by American Depositary
Receipts), each representing one common share of Vale
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
5.50% Guaranteed Notes due 2010, Series RIO, issued by Vale
Capital
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
5.50% Guaranteed Notes due 2010, Series RIO P, issued by
Vale Capital
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
6.75% Guaranteed Notes due 2012, Series VALE, issued by
Vale Capital II
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
6.75% Guaranteed Notes due 2012, Series VALE.P, issued by
Vale Capital II
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
9.0% Guaranteed Notes due 2013, issued by Vale Overseas
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
6.25% Guaranteed Notes due 2016, issued by Vale Overseas
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
6.250% Guaranteed Notes due 2017, issued by Vale Overseas
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
55/8%
Guaranteed Notes due 2019, issued by Vale Overseas
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
8.25% Guaranteed Notes due 2034, issued by Vale Overseas
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
6.875% Guaranteed Notes due 2036, issued by Vale Overseas
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
6.875% Guaranteed Notes due 2039, issued by Vale Overseas
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Shares are not listed for trading,
but only in connection with the registration of American
Depositary Shares pursuant to the requirements of the New York
Stock Exchange.
|
Securities registered or to be
registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to
Section 15(d) of the Act: None
The number of outstanding shares of each class of stock of Vale
as of December 31, 2009 was:
3,181,726,583 common shares, no par
value per share
2,030,997,714 preferred class A shares, no par value per
share
12 golden shares, no par value per share
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act.
Yes þ No o
If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by
check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports
pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934.
Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject
to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in Rule
12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
Large
accelerated
filer þ
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant
has used to prepare the financial statements included in this
filing:
U.S. GAAP þ International
Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International
Accounting Standards
Board o Other o
If Other has been checked in response to the
previous question, indicate by check mark which financial
statement item the registrant has elected to follow.
Item 17 o Item 18 o
If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the
registrant is a shell company (as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
ii
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
i
FORM 20-F
CROSS REFERENCE GUIDE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item
|
|
Form 20-F caption
|
|
Location in this
report
|
|
Page
|
|
|
1
|
|
Identity of directors, senior management
and advisers
|
|
Not applicable
|
|
-
|
|
2
|
|
Offer statistics and expected timetable
|
|
Not applicable
|
|
-
|
|
3
|
|
Key information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3A Selected financial data
|
|
Selected financial data
|
|
13
|
|
|
3B Capitalization and indebtedness
|
|
Not applicable
|
|
-
|
|
|
3C Reasons for the offer and use of proceeds
|
|
Not applicable
|
|
-
|
|
|
3D Risk factors
|
|
Risk factors
|
|
5
|
|
4
|
|
Information on the Company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4A History and development of the company
|
|
Business Overview, Capital expenditures and projects
|
|
15, 65
|
|
|
4B Business overview
|
|
Business overview, Lines of business, Reserves, Regulatory
matters
|
|
15, 22, 53, 69
|
|
|
4C Organizational structure
|
|
Exhibit 8
|
|
-
|
|
|
4D Property, plant and equipment
|
|
Lines of business, Capital expenditures and projects, Regulatory
matters
|
|
22, 65, 69
|
|
4A
|
|
Unresolved staff comments
|
|
None
|
|
-
|
|
5
|
|
Operating and financial review and prospects
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5A Operating results
|
|
Results of operations (2009 compared to 2008, and 2008 compared
to 2007)
|
|
79, 85
|
|
|
5B Liquidity and capital resources
|
|
Liquidity and capital resources
|
|
92
|
|
|
5C Research and development, patents and licences, etc.
|
|
Capital expenditures and projects
|
|
65
|
|
|
5D Trend information
|
|
Results of operations (2009 compared to 2008, and 2008 compared
to 2007)
|
|
79, 85
|
|
|
5E Off-balance sheet arrangements
|
|
Off-balance sheet arrangements
|
|
95
|
|
|
5F Tabular disclosure of contractual obligations
|
|
Contractual obligations
|
|
95
|
|
|
5G Safe harbor
|
|
Forward-looking statements
|
|
4
|
|
6
|
|
Directors, senior management and employees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6A Directors and senior management
|
|
Management
|
|
115
|
|
|
6B Compensation
|
|
Management compensation
|
|
123
|
|
|
6C Board practices
|
|
ManagementBoard of directors
|
|
115
|
|
|
6D Employees
|
|
Employees
|
|
124
|
|
|
6E Share ownership
|
|
Major shareholders; EmployeesPerformance-based compensation
|
|
108, 125
|
|
7
|
|
Major shareholders and related party transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7A Major shareholders
|
|
Major shareholders
|
|
108
|
|
|
7B Related party transactions
|
|
Related party transactions
|
|
111
|
|
|
7C Interests of experts and counsel
|
|
Not applicable
|
|
-
|
|
8
|
|
Financial information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8A Consolidated statements and other financial information
|
|
Financial statements
|
|
F-1
|
|
|
8B Significant changes
|
|
Not applicable
|
|
-
|
|
9
|
|
The offer and listing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9A Offer and listing details
|
|
Share price history
|
|
113
|
|
|
9B Plan of distribution
|
|
Not applicable
|
|
-
|
|
|
9C Markets
|
|
Trading markets
|
|
112
|
|
|
9D Selling shareholders
|
|
Not applicable
|
|
-
|
|
|
9E Dilution
|
|
Not applicable
|
|
-
|
|
|
9F Expenses of the issue
|
|
Not applicable
|
|
-
|
|
ii
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item
|
|
Form 20-F caption
|
|
Location in this
report
|
|
Page
|
|
|
10
|
|
Additional information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10A Share capital
|
|
Memorandum and articles of associationCommon shares and
preferred shares
|
|
127
|
|
|
10B Memorandum and articles of association
|
|
Memorandum and articles of association
|
|
127
|
|
|
10C Material contracts
|
|
Lines of business; Results of operations; Related party
transactions
|
|
22, 79, 111
|
|
|
10D Exchange controls
|
|
Exchange controls and other limitations affecting security
holders
|
|
134
|
|
|
10E Taxation
|
|
Taxation
|
|
135
|
|
|
10F Dividends and paying agents
|
|
Not applicable
|
|
-
|
|
|
10G Statement by experts
|
|
Reserves
|
|
53
|
|
|
10H Documents on display
|
|
Information filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission
|
|
146
|
|
|
10I Subsidiary information
|
|
Not applicable
|
|
-
|
|
11
|
|
Quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk
|
|
Risk management
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Description of securities other than equity securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12A Debt securities
|
|
Not applicable
|
|
-
|
|
|
12B Warrants and rights
|
|
Not applicable
|
|
-
|
|
|
12C Other securities
|
|
Not applicable
|
|
-
|
|
|
12D American Depositary Shares
|
|
American Depositary Shares
|
|
113
|
|
13
|
|
Defaults, dividend arrearages and delinquencies
|
|
Not applicable
|
|
-
|
|
14
|
|
Material modifications to the rights of security holders and
use of proceeds
|
|
Not applicable
|
|
-
|
|
15
|
|
Controls and procedures
|
|
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures
|
|
142
|
|
16
|
|
16A Audit Committee financial expert
|
|
ManagementFiscal Council
|
|
121
|
|
|
16B Code of ethics
|
|
Code of ethics
|
|
145
|
|
|
16C Principal accountant fees and services
|
|
Principal accountant fees and services
|
|
145
|
|
|
16D Exemptions from the listing standards for audit committees
|
|
ManagementFiscal Council; Corporate governance
|
|
121, 143
|
|
|
16E Purchase of equity securities by the issuer and affiliated
purchasers
|
|
Purchases of equity securities by the issuer and affiliated
purchasers
|
|
114
|
|
|
16F Change in registrants certifying accountant
|
|
Not applicable
|
|
-
|
|
|
16G Corporate governance
|
|
Corporate governance
|
|
143
|
|
17
|
|
Financial statements
|
|
Not applicable
|
|
-
|
|
18
|
|
Financial statements
|
|
Financial statements
|
|
F-1
|
|
19
|
|
Exhibits
|
|
Exhibits
|
|
146
|
|
iii
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
This annual report contains statements that may constitute
forward-looking statements within the meaning of the safe harbor
provisions of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform
Act of 1995. Many of those forward-looking statements can be
identified by the use of forward-looking words such as
anticipate, believe, could,
expect, should, plan,
intend, estimate and
potential, among others. Those statements appear in
a number of places and include statements regarding our intent,
belief or current expectations with respect to:
|
|
|
|
|
our direction and future operation;
|
|
|
|
the implementation of our principal operating strategies,
including our potential participation in acquisition,
divestiture or joint venture transactions or other investment
opportunities;
|
|
|
|
the implementation of our financing strategy and capital
expenditure plans;
|
|
|
|
the exploration of mineral reserves and development of mining
facilities;
|
|
|
|
the depletion and exhaustion of mines and mineral reserves;
|
|
|
|
trends in commodity prices and demand for commodities;
|
|
|
|
the future impact of competition and regulation;
|
|
|
|
the payment of dividends;
|
|
|
|
industry trends, including the direction of prices and expected
levels of supply and demand;
|
|
|
|
other factors or trends affecting our financial condition or
results of operations; and
|
|
|
|
the factors discussed under Risk factors.
|
We caution you that forward-looking statements are not
guarantees of future performance and involve risks and
uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from those
in forward-looking statements as a result of various factors.
These risks and uncertainties include factors relating to
(a) the countries in which we operate, mainly Brazil and
Canada, (b) the global economy, (c) capital markets,
(d) the mining and metals businesses and their dependence
upon global industrial production, which is cyclical by nature,
and (e) the high degree of global competition in the
markets in which we operate. For additional information on
factors that could cause our actual results to differ from
expectations reflected in forward-looking statements, see
Risk factors. Forward-looking statements speak only as of
the date they are made, and we do not undertake any obligation
to update them in light of new information or future
developments. All forward-looking statements attributed to us or
a person acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their
entirety by this cautionary statement, and you should not place
undue reliance on any forward-looking statement.
Vale S.A. is a stock corporation, or sociedade por
ações, organized on January 11, 1943 and existing
under the laws of the Federative Republic of Brazil for an
unlimited period of time. Its head offices are located at
Avenida Graça Aranha, No. 26,
20030-900
Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil, and its telephone number is
55-21-3814-4477.
In this report, references to Vale are to Vale
S.A. References to us or we are to Vale
and, except where the context otherwise requires, its
consolidated subsidiaries. References to our preferred
shares are to our preferred class A shares.
References to our ADSs or American Depositary
Shares include both our common American Depositary Shares
(our common ADSs), each of which represents one
common share of Vale, and our preferred American Depositary
Shares (our preferred ADSs), each of which
represents one
4
preferred share of Vale. American Depositary Shares are
represented by American Depositary Receipts (ADRs)
issued by the depositary. Unless otherwise specified, we use
metric units.
References to real, reais or
R$ are to the official currency of Brazil, the real
(singular) or reais (plural). References to
U.S. dollars or US$ are to United
States dollars. References to CAD are to Canadian
dollars, and references to A$ are to Australian
dollars.
RISK
FACTORS
Risks
relating to our business
The
mining industry is highly exposed to the cyclicality of global
economic activity and requires significant investments of
capital.
The mining industry is primarily a supplier of industrial raw
materials. Industrial production tends to be the most cyclical
and volatile component of global economic activity, which
affects demand for minerals and metals. At the same time,
investment in mining requires a substantial amount of funds in
order to replenish reserves, expand production capacity, build
infrastructure and preserve the environment. Both the
sensitivity to industrial production and the need for
significant capital investments are important sources of
financial risk for the mining industry.
Adverse
economic developments in China could have a negative impact on
our revenues, cash flow and profitability.
China has been the main driver of global demand for minerals and
metals over the last few years. In 2009, Chinese demand
represented 68% of global demand for seaborne iron ore, 44% of
global demand for nickel, 39% of global demand for aluminum and
40% of global demand for copper. The percentage of our operating
revenues attributable to sales to consumers in China was 38% in
2009. Although China largely withstood the recent global
recession, a contraction of Chinas economic growth could
result in lower demand for our products, leading to lower
revenues, cash flow and profitability. Poor performance in the
Chinese real estate sector, one of the largest consumers of
carbon steel in China, could also negatively impact our results.
A decline
in demand for steel would adversely affect our
business.
Demand for our most important products depends on global demand
for steel. Iron ore and iron ore pellets, which together
accounted for 59% of our 2009 operating revenues, are used to
produce carbon steel. Nickel, which accounted for 14% of our
2009 operating revenues, is used mainly to produce stainless and
alloy steels. Demand for steel depends heavily on global
economic conditions, but it also depends on a variety of
regional and sectoral factors. The prices of different steels
and the performance of the global steel industry are highly
cyclical and volatile, and these business cycles in the steel
industry affect demand and prices for our products. In addition,
vertical backward integration of the steel industry could reduce
the global seaborne trade of iron ore.
The global seaborne trade of iron ore could also suffer from
competition from metallics, such as semi-finished steel and
scrap. In certain cases, it may be more economical for
steelmakers to charge more scrap in basic oxygen furnaces
(BOF) and electric arc furnaces (EAF),
instead of producing pig iron. Semi-finished products, such as
billets and slabs, may also be available from fully-integrated
steel mills at low cost, reducing overall demand for seaborne
iron ore.
The
prices of nickel, aluminum and copper, which are actively traded
on world commodity exchanges, are subject to significant
volatility.
Nickel, aluminum and copper are sold in an active global market
and traded on commodity exchanges, such as the London Metal
Exchange and the New York Mercantile Exchange. Prices for these
metals are subject to significant fluctuations and are affected
by many factors, including actual and expected global
5
macroeconomic and political conditions, levels of supply and
demand, the availability and cost of substitutes, inventory
levels, investments by commodity funds and others and actions of
participants in the commodity markets.
Increased
availability of alternative nickel sources or substitution of
nickel from end use applications could adversely affect our
nickel business.
Scrap nickel competes directly with primary nickel as a source
of nickel for use in the production of stainless steel, and the
choice between them is largely driven by their relative prices
and availability. In 2009, the stainless steel scrap ratio fell
from 49% to 43%. Nickel pig iron, a product developed by Chinese
steel and alloy makers that utilizes lateritic nickel ores,
competes with other nickel sources in the production of
stainless steel. In 2009, estimated nickel pig iron production
increased 17%, representing 7% of global nickel output. Demand
for primary nickel may be negatively affected by the direct
substitution of primary nickel with other materials in current
applications. In response to high nickel prices or other
factors, producers and consumers of stainless steel may
partially shift from stainless steel with high nickel content
(series 300) to stainless steels with either lower
nickel content (series 200) or no nickel content
(series 400), which would adversely affect demand for
nickel.
We may
not be able to adjust production volume in a timely or
cost-efficient manner in response to changes in
demand.
During periods of high demand, our ability to rapidly increase
production capacity is limited, which could render us unable to
satisfy demand for our products. Moreover, we may be unable to
complete expansions and greenfield projects in time to take
advantage of rising demand for iron ore. When demand exceeds our
production capacity, we may meet excess customer demand by
purchasing iron ore, iron ore pellets or nickel from joint
ventures or unrelated parties and reselling it, which would
increase our costs and narrow our operating margins. If we are
unable to satisfy excess customer demand in this way, we may
lose customers. In addition, operating close to full capacity
may expose us to higher costs, including demurrage fees due to
capacity restraints in our logistics systems.
Conversely, operating at significant idle capacity during
periods of weak demand may expose us to higher unit production
costs since a significant portion of our cost structure is fixed
in the short-term due to the high capital intensity of mining
operations. In addition, efforts to reduce costs during periods
of weak demand could be limited by labor regulations or previous
labor or government agreements.
Regulatory,
political, economic and social conditions in the countries in
which we have operations or projects could adversely impact our
business and the market prices of our securities.
Our financial performance may be negatively affected by
regulatory, political, economic and social conditions in
countries in which we have significant operations or projects,
particularly Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, Colombia,
Indonesia, Mozambique, New Caledonia and Peru.
Our operations depend on authorizations and concessions from
governmental regulatory agencies of the countries in which we
operate. For details about the authorizations and concessions
upon which our operations depend, see Information on the
companyRegulatory matters. We are subject to
laws and regulations in many jurisdictions that can change at
any time, and changes in laws and regulations may require
modifications to our technologies and operations and result in
unanticipated capital expenditures.
Actual or potential political changes and changes in economic
policy may undermine investor confidence, result in economic
slowdowns and otherwise adversely affect the economic and other
conditions under which we operate in ways that could have a
material adverse effect on our business.
Protestors have taken actions to disrupt our operations and
projects, and they may continue to do so in the future. Although
we vigorously defend ourselves against illegal acts, while
supporting the communities living near our operations, future
attempts by protestors to harm our operations could adversely
affect our business.
6
We could
be adversely affected by changes in government policies,
including the imposition of new taxes or royalties on mining
activities.
Mining is subject to government regulation in the form of taxes
and royalties, which can have an important financial impact on
our operations. In the countries where we operate, governments
may impose new taxes, raise existing taxes and royalties, or
change the basis on which they are calculated in a manner that
is unfavorable to us.
Our
projects are subject to risks that may result in increased costs
or delay that prevent their successful implementation.
We are investing to further increase our production capacity,
logistics capabilities and to expand the scope of minerals we
produce. Our projects are subject to a number of risks that may
adversely affect our growth prospects and profitability,
including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
We may encounter delays or higher than expected costs in
obtaining the necessary equipment or services to build and
operate a project.
|
|
|
|
Our efforts to develop projects according to schedule may be
hampered by a lack of infrastructure, including a reliable power
supply.
|
|
|
|
We may fail to obtain, or experience delays or higher than
expected costs in obtaining, the required permits to build a
project.
|
|
|
|
Changes in market conditions or regulations may make a project
less profitable than expected at the time we initiated work
on it.
|
|
|
|
Adverse mining conditions may delay and hamper our ability to
produce the expected quantities of minerals.
|
|
|
|
Some of our development projects are located in regions where
tropical diseases, AIDS, malaria, yellow fever and other
contagious diseases are a major public health issue and pose
health and safety risks to our employees. If we are unable to
ensure the health and safety of our employees, our business may
be adversely affected.
|
Our
controlling shareholder has significant influence over Vale, and
the Brazilian government has certain veto rights.
As of March 31, 2010, Valepar S.A. owned 52.7% of our
outstanding common stock and 32.4% of our total outstanding
capital. As a result of its share ownership, Valepar can control
the outcome of some actions that require shareholder approval.
For a description of our ownership structure and of the Valepar
shareholders agreement, see Share ownership and
tradingMajor shareholders.
The Brazilian government owns 12 golden shares of Vale, granting
it limited veto power over certain company actions, such as
changes to our name, the location of our headquarters and our
corporate purpose as it relates to mining activities. For a
detailed description of the Brazilian governments veto
powers, see Additional informationMemorandum and
articles of associationCommon shares and preferred
shares.
Our
governance and compliance processes may fail to prevent
regulatory penalties and reputational harm.
We operate in a global environment, and our activities straddle
multiple jurisdictions and complex regulatory frameworks with
increased enforcement activities worldwide. Our governance and
compliance processes, which include the review of internal
control over financial reporting, may not prevent future
breaches of law, accounting or governance standards. We may be
subject to breaches of our Code of Ethical
7
Conduct, business conduct protocols and instances of fraudulent
behavior and dishonesty by our employees, contractors or other
agents. Our failure to comply with applicable laws and other
standards could subject us to fines, loss of operating licenses
and reputational harm.
Some of
our operations depend on joint ventures or consortia, and our
business could be adversely affected if our partners fail to
observe their commitments.
We currently operate important parts of our pelletizing,
bauxite, coal and steel businesses through joint ventures with
other companies. Important parts of our electricity investments
and all of our oil and gas projects are operated through
consortia. Our forecasts and plans for these joint ventures and
consortia assume that our partners will observe their
obligations to make capital contributions, purchase products
and, in some cases, provide skilled and competent managerial
personnel. If any of our partners fails to observe its
commitments, the affected joint venture or consortium may not be
able to operate in accordance with its business plans, or we may
have to increase the level of our investment to implement these
plans. For example, the joint venture company that owns our Goro
project in New Caledonia has a minority shareholder, Sumic
Nickel Netherlands B.V., with a put option to sell us 25%, 50%,
or 100% of its shares. Sumic may exercise the put option if the
cost of the project exceeds a certain value agreed between the
shareholders and certain other conditions are met. For more
information about our joint ventures, see Information on the
companyLines of business.
Environmental,
health and safety regulation may adversely affect our
business.
Our operations involve the use, handling, discharge and disposal
of hazardous materials into the environment and the use of
natural resources, and nearly all aspects of our activities,
products, services and projects around the world are subject to
environmental, health and safety regulation, which may expose us
to increased litigation or increased costs. Such regulations
require us to obtain environmental licenses, permits and
authorizations for our operations, and to conduct environmental
impact assessments in order to get the approval for our projects
and permission for initiating construction. Additionally, all
significant changes to existing operations must also undergo the
same procedure. Difficulties in obtaining permits may lead to
construction delays or cost increases, and in some cases may
lead us to postpone or even abandon a project. Environmental
regulation also imposes standards and controls on activities
relating to mineral research, mining, pelletizing activities,
railway and marine services, decomissioning, refining,
distribution and marketing of our products. Such regulation may
give rise to significant costs and liabilities. In addition,
community activist groups and other stakeholders may increase
demands for socially responsible and environmentally sustainable
practices, which could entail significant costs and reduce our
profitability. Private litigation relating to these or other
matters may adversely affect our financial condition or cause
harm to our reputation.
Environmental regulation in many countries in which we operate
has become stricter in recent years, and it is possible that
more regulation or more aggressive enforcement of existing
regulations will adversely affect us by imposing restrictions on
our activities and products, creating new requirements for the
issuance or renewal of environmental licenses, raising our costs
or requiring us to engage in expensive reclamation efforts.
Concern over climate change, and efforts to comply with
international undertakings under the Kyoto Protocol, could lead
governments to impose limits on carbon emissions applicable to
our operations, which could adversely affect our operating costs
or our capital expenditure requirements. For example, the
Brazilian government passed a carbon emissions law
(Política Nacional de Mudanças Climáticas)
in December 2009, although it has not yet promulgated rules
establishing specific limits on carbon emissions from mining
activities.
Our
reserve estimates may materially differ from mineral quantities
that we may be able to actually recover; our estimates of mine
life may prove inaccurate; and market price fluctuations and
changes in operating and capital costs may render certain ore
reserves uneconomical to mine.
Our reported ore reserves are estimated quantities of ore and
minerals that we have determined can be economically mined and
processed under present and anticipated conditions to extract
their mineral content.
8
There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating
quantities of reserves and in projecting potential future rates
of mineral production, including factors beyond our control.
Reserve engineering involves estimating deposits of minerals
that cannot be measured in an exact manner, and the accuracy of
any reserve estimate is a function of the quality of available
data and engineering and geological interpretation and judgment.
As a result, no assurance can be given that the indicated amount
of ore will be recovered or that it will be recovered at the
rates we anticipate. Estimates may vary, and results of our
mining and production subsequent to the date of an estimate may
lead to revisions of estimates. Reserve estimates and estimates
of mine life may require revisions based on actual production
experience and other factors. For example, fluctuations in the
market prices of minerals and metals, reduced recovery rates or
increased operating and capital costs due to inflation, exchange
rates or other factors may render proven and probable reserves
uneconomic to exploit and may ultimately result in a restatement
of reserves.
We may
not be able to replenish our reserves, which could adversely
affect our mining prospects.
We engage in mineral exploration, which is highly speculative in
nature, involves many risks and frequently is non-productive.
Our exploration programs, which involve significant capital
expenditures, may fail to result in the expansion or replacement
of reserves depleted by current production. If we do not develop
new reserves, we will not be able to sustain our current level
of production beyond the remaining lives of our existing mines.
Drilling
and production risks could adversely affect the mining
process.
Once mineral deposits are discovered, it can take a number of
years from the initial phases of drilling until production is
possible, during which the economic feasibility of production
may change. Substantial time and expenditures are required to:
|
|
|
|
|
establish mineral reserves through drilling;
|
|
|
|
determine appropriate mining and metallurgical processes for
optimizing the recovery of metal contained in ore;
|
|
|
|
obtain environmental and other licenses;
|
|
|
|
construct mining, processing facilities and infrastructure
required for greenfield properties; and
|
|
|
|
obtain the ore or extract the minerals from the ore.
|
If a project proves not to be economically feasible by the time
we are able to exploit it, we may incur substantial write-offs.
In addition, potential changes or complications involving
metallurgical and other technological processes arising during
the life of a project may result in cost overruns that may
render the project not economically feasible.
We face
rising extraction costs over time as reserves deplete.
Reserves are gradually depleted in the ordinary course of a
given mining operation. As mining progresses, distances to the
primary crusher and to waste deposits become longer, pits become
steeper and underground operations become deeper. As a result,
over time, we usually experience rising unit extraction costs
with respect to each mine. Several of our mines have been
operating for long periods, and we will likely experience rising
extraction costs per unit in the future at these operations in
particular.
Labor
disputes may disrupt our operations from time to time.
A substantial number of our employees, and some of the employees
of our subcontractors, are represented by labor unions and are
covered by collective bargaining or other labor agreements,
which are
9
subject to periodic negotiation. Negotiation may become more
difficult in times of higher prices and consequently higher
profits in the mining and metals industries, as labor unions may
seek wage increases.
Strikes and other labor disruptions at any of our operations
could adversely affect the operation of facilities and the
timing of completion and cost of our capital projects. A large
number of our unionized employees at our Canadian nickel
operations in Sudbury, Port Colborne and Voisey Bay have been on
strike since mid-2009, which has resulted in significantly
reduced production from these operations. For more information
about labor relations, see Management and
employeesEmployees. Moreover, we could be
adversely affected by labor disruptions involving unrelated
parties that may provide us with goods or services.
We may
face shortages of equipment, services and skilled
personnel.
The mining industry has faced worldwide shortages of mining and
construction equipment, spare parts, contractors and other
skilled personnel during periods of high demand for minerals and
metals and intense development of mining projects. We may
experience longer lead-times for mining equipment and problems
with the quality of contracted engineering, construction and
maintenance services. We compete with other mining companies for
highly skilled executives and staff with relevant industry and
technical experience, and we may not be able to attract and
retain such people. Shortages during peak periods could
negatively impact our operations, resulting in higher production
or capital expenditure costs, production interruptions, higher
inventory costs, project delays and potentially lower production
and revenues.
Higher
energy costs or energy shortages would adversely affect our
business.
Energy costs are a significant component of our cost of
production, representing 15.6% of our total cost of goods sold
in 2009. To fulfill our energy needs, we depend on the
following, all measured in tons of oil equivalent (TOE): oil
by-products, which represented 39% of total energy needs in
2009, electricity (38%), coal (15%) and natural gas (6%).
Fuel costs represented 9.4% of our cost of goods sold in 2009.
Increases in oil and gas prices adversely affect margins in our
logistics services, mining, iron ore pellets, nickel and alumina
businesses.
Electricity costs represented 6.2% of our total cost of goods
sold in 2009. If we are unable to secure reliable access to
electricity at acceptable prices, we may be forced to curtail
production or may experience higher production costs, either of
which would adversely affect our results of operations.
Electricity shortages have occurred in Brazil in the past and
could reoccur in the future, and there can be no assurance that
the Brazilian governments policies will succeed in
encouraging enough growth in power generation capacity to meet
future consumption increases. Future shortages, and government
efforts to respond to or prevent shortages, may adversely impact
the cost or supply of electricity for our Brazilian aluminum and
ferroalloy operations, which are electricity-intensive. Changes
in the laws, regulations or governmental policies regarding the
power sector or concession requirements could reduce our
expected returns from our investments in power generation.
Through our subsidiary PT International Nickel Indonesia Tbk
(PTI), we process lateritic nickel ores using a
pyrometallurgical process, which is energy-intensive. Although
PTI currently generates a majority of the electricity for its
operations from its own hydroelectric power plants, low rainfall
or other hydrological factors could adversely affect electricity
production at PTIs plants in the future, which could
significantly increase the risk of higher costs or lower
production volume.
Price
volatilityrelative to the U.S. dollarof the
currencies in which we conduct operations could adversely affect
our financial condition and results of operations.
A substantial portion of our revenues and debt is denominated in
U.S. dollars, and changes in exchange rates may result in
(i) losses or gains on our net U.S. dollar-denominated
indebtedness and accounts payable and (ii) fair value
losses or gains on our currency derivatives used to stabilize
our cash flow in U.S. dollars. In
10
2009 and 2007, we had currency gains of US$665 million and
US$1.639 billion, respectively; in 2008, we had currency
losses of US$1.011 billion. In addition, the price
volatility of the Brazilian real, the Canadian dollar,
the Indonesian rupiah and other currencies against the
U.S. dollar affect our results since most of our costs of
goods sold are denominated in currencies other than the
U.S. dollar, principally the real (64% in
2009) and the Canadian dollar (16% in 2009), while our
revenues are mostly U.S. dollar-denominated. We expect
currency fluctuations to continue to affect our financial
income, expense and cash flow generation.
Significant volatility in currency prices may also result in
disruption of foreign exchange markets and may limit our ability
to transfer or to convert certain currencies into
U.S. dollars and other currencies for the purpose of making
timely payments of interest and principal on our indebtedness.
The central banks and governments of the countries in which we
operate may institute restrictive exchange rate policies in the
future.
We may
not have adequate insurance coverage for some business
risks.
Our businesses are generally subject to a number of risks and
hazards, which could result in damage to, or destruction of,
mineral properties, facilities and equipment. The insurance we
maintain against risks that are typical in our business may not
provide adequate coverage. Insurance against some risks
(including liabilities for environmental pollution or certain
hazards or interruption of certain business activities) may not
be available at a reasonable cost, or at all. As a result,
accidents or other negative developments involving our mining,
production or transportation facilities could have a material
adverse effect on our operations.
Risks
relating to our American Depositary Shares
If ADR
holders exchange ADSs for the underlying shares, they risk
losing the ability to remit foreign currency abroad.
The custodian for the shares underlying our ADSs maintains a
registration with the Central Bank of Brazil entitling it to
remit U.S. dollars outside Brazil for payments of dividends
and other distributions relating to the shares underlying our
ADSs or upon the disposition of the underlying shares. If an ADR
holder exchanges its ADSs for the underlying shares, it will be
entitled to rely on the custodians registration for only
five business days from the date of exchange. Thereafter, an ADR
holder may not be able to obtain and remit U.S. dollars
abroad upon the disposition of, or distributions relating to,
the underlying shares unless it obtains its own registration
under Resolution No. 2,689 of the National Monetary
Council, which permits qualifying institutional foreign
investors to buy and sell securities on the BM&FBOVESPA.
For more information regarding these exchange controls, see
Additional informationExchange controls and
other limitations affecting security holders. If an ADR
holder attempts to obtain its own registration, it may incur
expenses or suffer delays in the application process, which
could delay the receipt of dividends or other distributions
relating to the underlying shares or the return of capital in a
timely manner.
We cannot assure ADR holders that the custodians
registration or any registration obtained will not be affected
by future legislative changes, or that additional restrictions
applicable to ADR holders, the disposition of the underlying
shares or the repatriation of the proceeds from disposition will
not be imposed in the future.
ADR
holders may be unable to exercise preemptive rights relating to
the shares underlying their ADSs.
ADR holders may not be able to exercise preemptive rights, or
exercise other types of rights, with respect to the underlying
shares. The ability of ADR holders to exercise preemptive rights
is not assured, particularly if the applicable law in the
holders jurisdiction (for example, the Securities Act in
the United States) requires that either a registration statement
be effective or an exemption from registration be available with
respect to those rights. We are not obligated to file a
registration statement in the United States, or to make any
other similar filing in any other jurisdiction, relating to
preemptive rights or to undertake steps that may be needed to
make exemptions from registration available, and we cannot
assure ADR holders that we will file any registration statement
or take such steps. For a more complete description of
preemptive rights
11
with respect to the underlying shares, see Additional
informationMemorandum and articles of
associationPreemptive rights.
ADR
holders may encounter difficulties in the exercise of voting
rights.
ADR holders do not have the rights of shareholders. They have
only the contractual rights set forth for their benefit under
the deposit agreements. ADR holders are not permitted to attend
shareholders meetings, and they may only vote by providing
instructions to the depositary. In the event that we fail to
provide the depositary with voting materials on a timely basis,
or the depositary does not provide sufficient time for ADR
holders to submit voting instructions, ADR holders will not be
able to vote. With respect to ADSs for which instructions are
not received, the depositary may, subject to certain
limitations, grant a proxy to a person designated by us.
The legal
protections for holders of our securities differ from one
jurisdiction to another and may be inconsistent, unfamiliar or
less effective than investors anticipate.
We are a global company with securities traded in several
different markets and investors located in many different
countries. The legal regime for the protection of investors
varies around the world, sometimes in important respects, and
investors in our securities should recognize that the
protections and remedies available to them may be different from
those to which they are accustomed in their home markets. We are
subject to securities legislation in several countries, which
have different rules, supervision and enforcement practices. The
only corporate law applicable to us is the law of Brazil, with
its specific substantive rules and judicial procedures. We are
subject to corporate governance rules in several jurisdictions
where our securities are listed, but as a foreign private
issuer, we are not required to follow many of the corporate
governance rules that apply to U.S. domestic issuers with
securities listed on the New York Stock Exchange, and we are not
subject to the U.S. proxy rules.
PRESENTATION
OF FINANCIAL INFORMATION
We have prepared our financial statements in this annual report
in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in
the United States (U.S. GAAP), which differ in
certain respects from accounting practices adopted in Brazil
(Brazilian GAAP). Brazilian GAAP is determined by
the requirements of Brazilian corporate law and the rules and
regulations of the Brazilian Securities Commission
(Comissão de Valores Mobiliários), or CVM. We also
publish Brazilian GAAP financial statements and use them for
reports to Brazilian shareholders, CVM filings, determining the
legal minimum dividend under Brazilian law and determining our
Brazilian tax liability.
Beginning in 2008, significant changes are being made to
Brazilian corporate law to permit Brazilian GAAP to converge
with International Financial Reporting Standards
(IFRS). Pursuant to CVM regulations, we are required
to report our financial statements in IFRS beginning with the
year ending December 31, 2010. We do not currently expect
to discontinue U.S. GAAP reporting for the year ended
December 31, 2010.
Our financial statements and the other financial information in
this annual report have been translated from Brazilian reais
into U.S. dollars on the basis explained in Note 3
to our financial statements, unless we indicate otherwise.
12
SELECTED
FINANCIAL DATA
The tables below present selected consolidated financial
information as of and for the periods indicated. You should read
this information together with our consolidated financial
statements in this annual report.
Statement
of income data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
Net operating revenues
|
|
|
12,792
|
|
|
|
19,651
|
|
|
|
32,242
|
|
|
|
37,426
|
|
|
|
23,311
|
|
Cost of products and services
|
|
|
(6,229
|
)
|
|
|
(10,147
|
)
|
|
|
(16,463
|
)
|
|
|
(17,641
|
)
|
|
|
(13,621
|
)
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(583
|
)
|
|
|
(816
|
)
|
|
|
(1,245
|
)
|
|
|
(1,748
|
)
|
|
|
(1,130
|
)
|
Research and development
|
|
|
(277
|
)
|
|
|
(481
|
)
|
|
|
(733
|
)
|
|
|
(1,085
|
)
|
|
|
(981
|
)
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(950
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
(271
|
)
|
|
|
(570
|
)
|
|
|
(607
|
)
|
|
|
(1,254
|
)
|
|
|
(1,522
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
5,432
|
|
|
|
7,637
|
|
|
|
13,194
|
|
|
|
14,748
|
|
|
|
6,057
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-operating income (expenses):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial income (expenses)
|
|
|
(437
|
)
|
|
|
(1,011
|
)
|
|
|
(1,291
|
)
|
|
|
(1,975
|
)
|
|
|
351
|
|
Exchange and monetary gains, net
|
|
|
299
|
|
|
|
529
|
|
|
|
2,553
|
|
|
|
364
|
|
|
|
675
|
|
Gain on sale of investments
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
674
|
|
|
|
777
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
2,039
|
|
|
|
(1,531
|
)
|
|
|
1,066
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes and equity results
|
|
|
5,420
|
|
|
|
7,829
|
|
|
|
15,233
|
|
|
|
13,217
|
|
|
|
7,123
|
|
Income taxes charge
|
|
|
(880
|
)
|
|
|
(1,432
|
)
|
|
|
(3,201
|
)
|
|
|
(535
|
)
|
|
|
(2,100
|
)
|
Equity in results of affiliates and joint ventures and change in
provision for gains on equity investments
|
|
|
760
|
|
|
|
710
|
|
|
|
595
|
|
|
|
794
|
|
|
|
433
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
5,300
|
|
|
|
7,107
|
|
|
|
12,627
|
|
|
|
13,476
|
|
|
|
5,456
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to non-controlling interests
|
|
|
(459
|
)
|
|
|
(579
|
)
|
|
|
(802
|
)
|
|
|
(258
|
)
|
|
|
(107
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Companys stockholders
|
|
|
4,841
|
|
|
|
6,528
|
|
|
|
11,825
|
|
|
|
13,218
|
|
|
|
5,349
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash paid to shareholders(1)
|
|
|
1,300
|
|
|
|
1,300
|
|
|
|
1,875
|
|
|
|
2,850
|
|
|
|
2,724
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Consists of total cash paid to
shareholders during the period, whether classified as dividends
or interest on shareholders equity.
|
13
Basic and
diluted earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31,(1)
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008(5)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(US$, except as noted)
|
|
|
Earnings per share(2):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per common share
|
|
|
1.05
|
|
|
|
1.35
|
|
|
|
2.41
|
|
|
|
2.58
|
|
|
|
0.97
|
|
Per preferred share
|
|
|
1.05
|
|
|
|
1.35
|
|
|
|
2.41
|
|
|
|
2.58
|
|
|
|
0.97
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.42
|
|
|
|
2.61
|
|
|
|
1.00
|
|
Per preferred share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.42
|
|
|
|
2.61
|
|
|
|
1.00
|
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding (in thousands)(3):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares
|
|
|
2,943,216
|
|
|
|
2,943,216
|
|
|
|
2,943,216
|
|
|
|
3,028,817
|
|
|
|
3,181,706
|
|
Preferred shares
|
|
|
1,662,864
|
|
|
|
1,908,852
|
|
|
|
1,889,171
|
|
|
|
1,946,454
|
|
|
|
2,030,700
|
|
Treasury common shares underlying convertible notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,510
|
|
|
|
56,582
|
|
|
|
74,998
|
|
Treasury preferred shares underlying convertible notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,478
|
|
|
|
30,295
|
|
|
|
77,580
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
4,606,080
|
|
|
|
4,852,068
|
|
|
|
4,885,375
|
|
|
|
5,062,148
|
|
|
|
5,364,984
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions to shareholders per share(4):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In US$
|
|
|
0.28
|
|
|
|
0.27
|
|
|
|
0.39
|
|
|
|
0.56
|
|
|
|
0.53
|
|
In R$
|
|
|
0.67
|
|
|
|
0.58
|
|
|
|
0.74
|
|
|
|
1.09
|
|
|
|
1.01
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Share and per-share amounts for all
periods give retroactive effect to all forward stock splits. We
carried out
two-for-one
forward stock splits in September 2007 and in May 2006.
|
(2)
|
|
Diluted earnings per share for
2007, 2008 and 2009 include preferred shares and common shares
underlying the mandatorily convertible notes issued in June
2007. Diluted earnings per share for 2009 also include preferred
shares and common shares underlying the mandatorily convertible
notes issued in July 2009.
|
(3)
|
|
Each common ADS represents one
common share and each preferred ADS represents one preferred
share.
|
(4)
|
|
Our distributions to shareholders
may be classified as either dividends or interest on
shareholders equity. Since 2005, part of each distribution
has been classified as interest on shareholders equity and
part as dividends. For information about distributions paid to
shareholders, see Share ownership and
tradingDistributions.
|
(5)
|
|
In July 2008, we issued 80,079,223
common ADSs, 176,847,543 common shares, 63,506,751 preferred
ADSs and 100,896,048 preferred shares in a global equity
offering. In August 2008, we issued an additional 24,660,419
preferred shares. In October 2008, our Board of Directors
approved a share buy-back program, which was terminated on
May 27, 2009. While the program was in effect, Vale
acquired 18,415,859 common shares and 47,284,800 preferred
class A shares, corresponding respectively to 1.5% and 2.4%
of the outstanding shares of each class on the date the program
was launched. For more information see Share ownership and
tradingPurchases of equity securities by the issuer
and affiliated purchasers.
|
Balance
sheet data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
4,775
|
|
|
|
12,940
|
|
|
|
11,380
|
|
|
|
23,238
|
|
|
|
21,294
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
14,166
|
|
|
|
38,007
|
|
|
|
54,625
|
|
|
|
49,329
|
|
|
|
68,810
|
|
Investments in affiliated companies and joint ventures and other
investments
|
|
|
1,672
|
|
|
|
2,353
|
|
|
|
2,922
|
|
|
|
2,408
|
|
|
|
4,585
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
2,031
|
|
|
|
7,626
|
|
|
|
7,790
|
|
|
|
5,017
|
|
|
|
7,590
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
22,644
|
|
|
|
60,926
|
|
|
|
76,717
|
|
|
|
79,992
|
|
|
|
102,279
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
3,325
|
|
|
|
7,312
|
|
|
|
10,083
|
|
|
|
7,237
|
|
|
|
9,181
|
|
Long-term liabilities(1)
|
|
|
2,410
|
|
|
|
10,008
|
|
|
|
13,195
|
|
|
|
10,173
|
|
|
|
12,703
|
|
Long-term debt(2)
|
|
|
3,714
|
|
|
|
21,122
|
|
|
|
17,608
|
|
|
|
17,535
|
|
|
|
19,898
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
9,449
|
|
|
|
38,442
|
|
|
|
40,886
|
|
|
|
34,945
|
|
|
|
32,601
|
|
Redeemable non-controlling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
|
375
|
|
|
|
599
|
|
|
|
731
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital stock
|
|
|
5,868
|
|
|
|
8,119
|
|
|
|
12,306
|
|
|
|
23,848
|
|
|
|
23,839
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
498
|
|
|
|
498
|
|
|
|
498
|
|
|
|
393
|
|
|
|
411
|
|
Mandatorily convertible notescommon ADSs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,288
|
|
|
|
1,288
|
|
|
|
1,578
|
|
Mandatorily convertible notespreferred ADSs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
581
|
|
|
|
581
|
|
|
|
1,225
|
|
Reserves and retained earnings
|
|
|
5,611
|
|
|
|
11,056
|
|
|
|
18,603
|
|
|
|
16,446
|
|
|
|
29,882
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Company shareholders equity
|
|
|
11,977
|
|
|
|
19,673
|
|
|
|
33,276
|
|
|
|
42,556
|
|
|
|
56,935
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-controlling interests
|
|
|
1,218
|
|
|
|
2,465
|
|
|
|
2,180
|
|
|
|
1,892
|
|
|
|
2,831
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
13,195
|
|
|
|
22,138
|
|
|
|
35,456
|
|
|
|
44,448
|
|
|
|
59,766
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
|
22,644
|
|
|
|
60,926
|
|
|
|
76,717
|
|
|
|
79,992
|
|
|
|
102,279
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Excludes long-term debt.
|
(2)
|
|
Excludes current portion of
long-term debt.
|
14
|
|
I.
|
INFORMATION
ON THE COMPANY
|
BUSINESS
OVERVIEW
Summary
We are the second-largest metals and mining company in the world
and the largest in the Americas, based on market capitalization.
We are the worlds largest producer of iron ore and iron
ore pellets and the worlds second-largest producer of
nickel. We are one of the worlds largest producers of
manganese ore, ferroalloys, bauxite, alumina and kaolin. We also
produce aluminum, copper, coal, potash, cobalt, platinum group
metals (PGMs) and other products. To support our
growth strategy, we are actively engaged in mineral exploration
efforts in 21 countries around the globe. We operate large
logistics systems in Brazil, including railroads, maritime
terminals and a port, which are integrated with our mining
operations. In addition, we are building a maritime freight
portfolio to transport iron ore. Directly and through affiliates
and joint ventures, we have investments in the energy and steel
businesses.
The following table presents the breakdown of our total
operating revenues attributable to each of our main lines of
business, each of which is described following the table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
(% of total)
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
(% of total)
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
(% of total)
|
|
|
Ferrous minerals:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iron ore
|
|
US$
|
11,908
|
|
|
|
36.0
|
%
|
|
US$
|
17,775
|
|
|
|
46.2
|
%
|
|
US$
|
12,831
|
|
|
|
53.6
|
%
|
Iron ore pellets
|
|
|
2,738
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
|
|
|
4,301
|
|
|
|
11.2
|
|
|
|
1,352
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
Manganese
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
Ferroalloys
|
|
|
719
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
1,211
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
372
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
Pig iron
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotalferrous minerals
|
|
US$
|
15,515
|
|
|
|
46.9
|
%
|
|
US$
|
23,699
|
|
|
|
61.6
|
%
|
|
US$
|
14,745
|
|
|
|
61.6
|
%
|
Non-ferrous minerals and metals:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nickel
|
|
US$
|
10,043
|
|
|
|
30.3
|
%
|
|
US$
|
5,970
|
|
|
|
15.5
|
%
|
|
US$
|
3,260
|
|
|
|
13.6
|
%
|
Aluminum
|
|
|
2,722
|
|
|
|
8.2
|
|
|
|
3,042
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
|
|
2,050
|
|
|
|
8.6
|
|
Copper
|
|
|
1,985
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
2,029
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
|
|
1,130
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
Fertilizer nutrients
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
413
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
PGMs
|
|
|
314
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
401
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
Other precious metals
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
Other non-ferrous minerals(1)
|
|
|
374
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
420
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotalnon-ferrous minerals/metals
|
|
US$
|
15,729
|
|
|
|
47.5
|
%
|
|
US$
|
12,268
|
|
|
|
31.9
|
%
|
|
US$
|
7,265
|
|
|
|
30.4
|
%
|
Coal
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
577
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
505
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
Logistics services
|
|
|
1,525
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
1,607
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
1,104
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
Other investments
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
358
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
320
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues
|
|
US$
|
33,115
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
US$
|
38,509
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
US$
|
23,939
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes kaolin and cobalt.
|
|
|
|
|
¡
|
Iron ore and iron ore pellets. We operate
three systems in Brazil for producing and distributing iron ore.
The Northern and the Southeastern Systems are fully integrated,
consisting of mines, railroads, a maritime terminal and a port.
The Southern System consists of three mining complexes and two
maritime terminals. We operate 10 pellet-producing plants in
Brazil. We also have a 50% stake in a joint venture that owns
three integrated pellet plants in Brazil and a 25% stake in a
pellet company in China.
|
15
|
|
|
|
¡
|
Manganese and ferroalloys. We conduct our
manganese mining operations through subsidiaries in Brazil, and
we produce several types of manganese ferroalloys through
subsidiaries in Brazil, France and Norway.
|
|
|
|
|
¡
|
Nickel. Our principal nickel mines and
processing operations are conducted by our wholly owned
subsidiary Vale Inco Limited (Vale Inco), which has
mining operations in Canada, Indonesia and New Caledonia. We own
and operate, or have interests in, nickel refining facilities in
the United Kingdom, Japan, Taiwan, South Korea and China.
|
|
|
¡
|
Aluminum. We are engaged in bauxite mining,
alumina refining, and aluminum metal smelting. In Brazil, we own
a bauxite mine, an alumina refinery and an aluminum smelter. We
have a 40% interest in Mineração Rio do Norte S.A.
(MRN), a bauxite producer, whose operations are also
located in Brazil.
|
|
|
¡
|
Copper. In Brazil, we produce copper
concentrates at Sossego in Carajás, in the state of
Pará. In Canada, we produce copper concentrate, copper
anode and copper cathode in conjunction with our nickel mining
operations at Sudbury and Voisey Bay.
|
|
|
¡
|
Fertilizer nutrients. We are Brazils
sole producer of potash, with operations in Rosario do Catete,
in the state of Sergipe. We are engaged in a major expansion of
our fertilizer nutrients business through acquisitions and
organic growth.
|
|
|
¡
|
PGMs. We produce PGMs as by-products of our
nickel mining and processing operations in Canada. The PGMs are
concentrated at our Port Colborne facilities, in the Province of
Ontario, Canada, and refined at our precious metals refinery in
Acton, England.
|
|
|
¡
|
Other precious metals. We produce gold and
silver as by-products of our nickel mining and processing
operations in Canada. Some of these precious metals are upgraded
at our facilities in Port Colborne, Ontario, and all are refined
by unrelated parties in Canada.
|
|
|
¡
|
Other non-ferrous minerals. We are one of the
worlds largest producers of kaolin for coating used by the
paper industry. We produce cobalt as a by-product of our nickel
mining and processing operations in Canada and refine it at our
Port Colborne facilities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coal: We produce metallurgical and
thermal coal through Vale Australia Holdings (Vale
Australia), which operates coal assets in Australia
through wholly owned subsidiaries and unincorporated joint
ventures. Through our subsidiary Vale Coal Colombia Ltd.
Sucursal Colombia (Vale Colombia) we produce thermal
coal in the Cesar department of Colombia. We have minority
interests in Chinese coal and coke producers.
|
|
|
|
Logistics services: We are a leading
provider of logistics services in Brazil, with railroads,
maritime terminals and a port. Two of our three iron ore systems
incorporate an integrated railroad network linked to automated
port and terminal facilities, which provide rail transportation
for our mining products, general cargo and passengers, bulk
terminal storage, and ship loading services for our mining
operations and for customers. We conduct seaborne dry bulk
shipping and provide tug boat services. We own and charter
vessels to transport our iron ore sold on a cost and freight
(CFR) basis to customers. Our tug boat services
provide an efficient and safe towing service at our terminals in
Brazil. We also own a 31.3% interest in Log-In Logística
Intermodal S.A. (Log-In), which provides intermodal
logistics services in Brazil, Argentina and Uruguay, and a 41.5%
interest in MRS Logística S.A. (MRS), which
transports our iron ore products from the Southern System mines
to our Guaíba Island and Itaguaí maritime terminals,
in the state of Rio de Janeiro.
|
16
Business
strategy
Our mission is to transform mineral resources into prosperity
and sustainable development. Our vision is to become the largest
mining company in the world, and to surpass established
standards of excellence in research, development, project
implementation and business operations. We aim to increase our
geographical and product diversification and logistics
capabilities. Iron ore and nickel will continue to be our main
businesses while we boost the production capacity of our copper,
coal and fertilizer nutrients businesses. To enhance our
competitiveness, we will continue to invest in our railroads,
maritime terminals, maritime freight portfolio and power
generation capacities. We continue to seek opportunities to make
strategic acquisitions, while focusing on disciplined capital
management in order to maximize return on invested capital and
total return to shareholders. Below we highlight our major
business strategies.
Maintaining
our leadership position in the global iron ore market
We continue to consolidate our leadership in the global iron ore
market. In 2008, we had an estimated market share of 30.2% of
the total volume traded in the seaborne market, and in 2009 it
decreased to 24.9% due to the severe impact of the global
recession on the steel industry in Brazil and Europe, two major
markets for the sale of our iron ore products. We are committed
to maintaining our leadership position in the global iron ore
market, by focusing our product line to capture industry trends,
increasing our production capacity in line with demand growth,
controlling costs, strengthening our logistics infrastructure of
railroads, ports, shipping and distribution centers, and
strengthening relationships with customers. Our diversified
portfolio of high quality products, strong technical marketing
strategy, efficient logistics and strong and long-standing
relationships with major customers will help us achieve this
goal. We have also encouraged steelmakers to develop steel
projects in Brazil through joint ventures in which we may
preferably hold minority stakes, in order to create additional
demand for our iron ore.
Achieving
leadership in the nickel business
We are the worlds second-largest nickel producer, with
large-scale, long-life and low-cost operations, a substantial
resource base, advanced technology and a robust growth profile.
We have refineries in North America, Europe and Asia, which
produce an array of products for use in most nickel
applications. We are a leading producer of high-quality nickel
products for non-stainless steel applications, such as plating,
alloy steels, high nickel alloys and batteries, which
represented 59% of our nickel sales in 2009. Our long-term goal
is to strengthen our leadership in the nickel business.
Developing
our copper resources
We believe that our copper projects, all of which are situated
in the Carajás mineral province in the Brazilian state of
Pará, could be among the most competitive in the world in
terms of investment cost per metric ton of ore. We are
developing the Salobo project to produce copper concentrate and
testing a new hydro-metallurgical technology at the Usina
Hidrometalúrgica de Carajás plant (UHC)
that could enable the development of other copper projects in
this region. We expect these copper mines to benefit from our
infrastructure facilities serving the Northern System. We are
developing the Tres Valles copper project in Chile, and we have
growth options in the copper business in Africa through a joint
venture with African Rainbow Minerals Limited (ARM).
We are engaged in mineral exploration in several countries to
increase our reserve base.
Investing
in coal
We are pursuing various opportunities to become a large global
player in the coal business. We have coal operating assets and a
portfolio of exploration projects in Australia and Colombia, and
minority interests in two joint ventures in China. We intend to
continue pursuing organic growth in the coal business through
the development of the Moatize project in Mozambique, the
development of more advanced coal exploration projects in
Australia and Colombia, and mineral exploration initiatives in
several countries, such as Mongolia.
17
Investing
in fertilizer nutrients
We are pursuing various opportunities to become a large producer
of fertilizer nutrients in order to benefit from rising global
consumption, which is expected to grow significantly in emerging
market countries. We expect per capita income growth and
biofuels to drive demand for fertilizers. In this context,
Brazil is expected to play a key role in the global agricultural
market, given its position as a global agricultural powerhouse
and its growth potential due to its access to water and arable
land for the expansion of the agricultural frontier.
We have developed an understanding of the fertilizer industry,
having successfully operated a potash mine in Brazil
(Taquari-Vassouras) since the early nineties. Our portfolio of
phosphate projects in Peru and Africa and potash projects in
Argentina, Brazil and Canada positions us to capture a
significant portion of market growth, especially in Brazil. We
are engaged in several phosphate and potash mineral exploration
projects around the world, and we are seeking opportunities to
accelerate our growth strategy. We are currently in the final
stage of negotiations to acquire fertilizer assets in Brazil.
For more information, see Significant changes in our
business below.
Diversification
and expansion of our resource base
We are actively engaged in a mineral exploration program, with
efforts in 21 countries around the globe. We are mainly seeking
new deposits of bauxite, coal, copper, iron ore, manganese ore,
nickel, phosphates, natural gas, PGMs, potash and uranium.
Mineral exploration is an important part of our organic growth
strategy.
Enhancing
our logistics capacity to support our iron ore
business
We believe that the quality of our railway assets and extensive
experience as a railroad and port operator, together with the
lack of efficient transportation for general cargo in Brazil,
position us as a leader in the logistics business in Brazil. We
have been expanding the capacity of our railroads primarily to
meet the needs of our iron ore business.
To support our commercial strategy for our iron ore business, we
continue to invest in a dedicated maritime freight shuttle
service from Brazil to Asia and in the development of
distribution centers in Asia and the Middle East in order to
minimize freight costs and maximize flexibility so as to enhance
the competitiveness of our iron ore business in these regions.
Developing
energy projects
Energy management and efficient supply have become a priority
for us. As a large consumer of electricity, we believe that
investing in power generation projects to support our operations
will help protect us against volatility in the price of energy,
regulatory uncertainties and the risk of energy shortages.
Accordingly, we have developed hydroelectric power generation
plants in Brazil, Canada and Indonesia, and we are using the
electricity from these projects to supply our internal needs. As
a potentially large consumer of natural gas, in 2007 we began
investing in natural gas exploration in Brazil through
consortia, and in 2009 we made our first discoveries. We are
seeking to diversify and optimize our energy matrix through
increased use of thermal coal, renewable fuels and natural gas.
Significant
changes in our business
We summarize below major acquisitions, divestitures and other
significant developments since the beginning of 2009.
18
Production
adjustments
During the second half of 2009, given the global economic
recovery and stronger demand fundamentals for minerals and
metals, we resumed iron ore operations in some mines in the
Southern and Southeastern Systems in the Brazilian state of
Minas Gerais, and we increased the pace of production at the
Carajás site. We resumed operations at the Itabrasco and
Hispanobras pellet plants in July and August, 2009,
respectively, and resumed production at the Fábrica and
São Luis plants in the first quarter of 2010, at which
point all of our pellet plants are in operation.
In the third quarter of 2009, we resumed our manganese ore and
ferroalloy operations, with the exception of two ferroalloy
plants in Brazil. During the course of 2009, in response to
improving market demand for kaolin, we increased production by
our subsidiaries CADAM S.A., in the state of Amapá, Brazil,
and PPSA, in the state of Pará, Brazil.
Acquisition
of fertilizer nutrient assets
In January 2010, we entered into an agreement to acquire 100% of
the outstanding shares of Bunge Participações e
Investimentos S.A. (BPI) for US$3.8 billion
from subsidiaries of Bunge Ltd. BPIs asset portfolio is
composed of (i) phosphate rock mines and phosphate assets
in Brazil and (ii) a 42.3% stake in the publicly traded
Brazilian company Fertilizantes Fosfatados S.A.-Fosfertil
(Fosfertil). Of the purchase price,
US$1.65 billion will be allocated to the phosphate rock and
phosphate assets, and the remaining US$2.15 billion to the
shares of Fosfertil. The acquisition does not involve any retail
or distribution business.
We also entered into contracts with Fertilizantes Heringer S.A.
(Heringer), Fertilizantes do Paraná Ltda.
(Fertipar), Yara Brasil Fertilizantes S.A.
(Yara) and The Mosaic Company (Mosaic)
that give us the right to directly and indirectly acquire
Fosfertil shares for the same price per share paid to BPI,
US$12.019, totaling US$1.9 billion, upon the closing of the
BPI acquisition and the satisfaction of other conditions.
As a result of these acquisitions, we will hold a 78.9% stake in
Fosfertil, corresponding to 99.8% of the common shares and 68.2%
of the preferred shares. The total price to be paid for the
acquisition of a 78.9% stake in Fosfertil is
US$4.007 billion. Including BPIs phosphate rock mines
and phosphate assets in Brazil, the acquisition of fertilizer
nutrients totals US$5.7 billion.
Pursuant to Brazilian corporate law and capital markets
regulations, once the acquisition of the above mentioned stakes
in Fosfertil are concluded, we will launch a mandatory offer to
buy the remaining 0.19% of the common shares held by the
minority shareholders for the same price per share agreed with
BPI, Heringer, Fertipar, Yara and Mosaic.
Acquisition
of copper exploration assets in the African copperbelt
In the first quarter of 2009, we acquired a 50% interest in a
joint venture with African Rainbow Minerals Limited
(ARM) for CAD81 million. The joint venture will
develop and operate the assets of TEAL Exploration &
Mining Incorporated (TEAL). TEAL has two copper
projects in the African copperbelt, Konkola North and Kalumines,
which together could represent a nominal production capacity of
65,000 metric tons of copper per year in the next few years, and
an extensive copper exploration portfolio.
Acquisition
of coal assets in Colombia
In the first quarter of 2009, we acquired 100% of the export
coal assets of Cementos Argos S.A. (Argos) in
Colombia for US$306 million, including inventories.
Argoss coal assets consist of the El Hatillo mine, the
Cerro Largo coal deposit, a port and a minority stake in a
railroad. Since Colombia is the worlds third-largest
exporter of high-quality thermal coal, given its low level of
sulfur and high calorific value, we are seeking to build a coal
asset platform in the country to enhance our growth options in
the coal business.
19
Acquisition
of potash deposits in Argentina and Canada
In the first quarter of 2009, we acquired 100% of the Rio
Colorado project (Rio Colorado) in Argentina and
100% of the Regina project in Canada, for US$850 million
from Rio Tinto plc. Rio Colorado includes the development of a
mine with an initial nominal capacity of 2.4 million metric
tons per year of potash, with potential for expansion to
4.35 million metric tons per year, construction of a
350-kilometer
railway spur, port facilities and a power plant. The Regina
project is still in the exploration stage, with potential to
deliver an estimated annual output of 2.8 million metric
tons of potash. Existing infrastructure near the project will
allow transportation of the final product to Vancouver on the
Canadian west coast, facilitating access to the fast-growing
Asian market, or Saint John on the east coast, facilitating
access to the Americas and the European market.
Acquisition
of Corumbá iron ore assets
In the third quarter of 2009, we acquired from Rio Tinto 100% of
the Corumbá open-pit iron ore mining operations in Brazil,
including associated logistics assets, inventory of final
products, and cash balance, for US$814 million. The
Corumbá iron ore mine is a world-class asset, characterized
by high grade and rich in direct-reduction lump ores. The
logistics assets support 70% of the operations
transportation needs.
Increasing
our stake in TKCSA
In the third quarter of 2009, we entered into an agreement with
ThyssenKrupp Steel AG to increase our stake in ThyssenKrupp CSA
Siderúrgica do Atlântico Ltda. (TKCSA)
from our current 10% interest to 26.87%, by investing
US$1.424 billion. TKCSA is building an integrated steel
slab plant, with nominal capacity of five million metric tons of
slab per year, in the state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Start-up is
currently scheduled for the first half of 2010. As a strategic
partner of ThyssenKrupp, we are the sole and exclusive supplier
of iron ore to TKCSA.
Organic
growth
We have an extensive program of investments in the organic
growth of our businesses. Our main investment projects are
summarized underCapital expenditures and projects.
The main projects that have come into stream since the beginning
of 2009 are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
We concluded Vargem Grande (formerly Itabiritos), a pellet
plant, in the first half of 2009. Vargem Grandes
operations have nominal production capacity of 7 million
metric tons per year.
|
|
|
|
In September 2009, we installed and commissioned a longwall at
the Carborough Downs coal mine in Queensland, Australia, which
is expected to significantly increase nominal production
capacity to 4.8 million metric tons per year in 2011.
|
|
|
|
We are in the initial stage of ramping up our Goro nickel
project in New Caledonia. We expect to
ramp-up Goro
over a three-year period to reach nominal production capacity of
60,000 metric tons per year of nickel and 4,600 metric tons of
cobalt.
|
|
|
|
We concluded the Southeastern Corridor project, expanding the
capacity of the EFVM railroad and the Tubarão port and
increasing our logistics capacity for iron ore in the
Southeastern System.
|
Divestitures
and asset sales
We are always seeking to optimize our portfolio structure. To
that end, we dispose of assets from time to time that we have
determined to be non-strategic. We summarize below our key
dispositions and asset sales since the beginning of 2009.
20
|
|
|
|
|
In the second quarter of 2009, we sold our remaining 2.93%
interest in Usiminas Siderúrgicas de Minas Gerais S.A.
(Usiminas) for US$273 million.
|
|
|
|
In July 2009, we entered into an agreement with Suzano Papel e
Celulose (Suzano) for the sale of forest assets to
Suzano, representing a total area of 84,700 hectares, including
preservation areas and a eucalyptus plantation in Maranhão,
for US$120 million.
|
|
|
|
In December 2009, as a result of a strategic review of our
downstream nickel operations, we sold The International Metals
Reclamation Company (INMETCO) for
US$38.6 million and our 65% stake in Jinco Nonferrous
Metals Co., Ltd (Jinco) for US$6.5 million.
During the same month, we entered into an agreement to sell our
76.7% stake in Inco Advanced Technology Materials (Dalian) Co.
Ltd. (IATM-D), and our 77% stake in Inco Advanced
Technology Materials (Shenyang) Co. Ltd. (IATM-S),
which operate nickel foam manufacturing plants in China, for
US$7 million, to affiliates of the other shareholders.
|
|
|
|
In January 2010, we entered into an agreement to sell mineral
rights for manganese and iron ore and related properties in the
Brazilian state of Bahia for US$16 million. In addition, we
sold three small hydroelectric power plants, which we had used
to supply part of the energy requirements of our ferroalloy
plants in Minas Gerais, for US$20 million.
|
|
|
|
In January 2010, our wholly owned subsidiary Valesul
Alumínio S.A. entered into an agreement to sell its
aluminum assets, in the state of Rio de Janeiro (Brazil), for
US$31.2 million.
|
|
|
|
In March 2010, we entered into an agreement with Mosaic and
Mitsui & Co. Ltd. (Mitsui) to sell
minority stakes in the Bayóvar project through a
newly-formed company that will control and operate the project
in Peru. We agreed to sell 35% of total capital to Mosaic for
US$385 million and 25% of total capital to Mitsui for
US$275 million. Following these transactions, we will
retain control of the Bayóvar project, holding 51% of the
voting shares and 40% of total capital of the newly formed
company.
|
21
LINES OF
BUSINESS
Our principal lines of business consist of mining and logistics
services. We also invest in energy to supply part of our
consumption. This section presents information about operations,
production, sales and competition and is organized as follows.
1. Ferrous
minerals
1.1 Iron ore
1.1.1 Operations
1.1.2 Production
1.2 Iron ore pellets
1.2.1 Operations
1.2.2 Production
1.3 Iron ore and iron ore pellets
1.3.1 Customers, sales and marketing
1.3.2 Competition
1.4 Manganese ore
1.5 Ferroalloys
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
Manganese ore and ferroalloys:
sales and competition
|
1.7 Pig iron
2. Non-ferrous
minerals
2.1 Nickel
2.1.1 Operations
2.1.2 Production
2.1.3 Customers and sales
2.1.4 Competition
2.2 Aluminum
2.2.1 Bauxite
2.2.2 Alumina
2.2.3 Aluminum
2.2.4 Customers and sales
2.2.5 Competition
2.3 Copper
2.3.1 Operations
2.3.2 Production
2.3.3 Customers and sales
2.3.4 Competition
2.4 Fertilizer nutrients
2.4.1 Potash
2.4.2 Phosphates
2.4.3 Customers and sales
2.4.4 Competition
2.5 PGMs and other precious metals
2.6 Other non-ferrous minerals
2.6.1 Cobalt
2.6.2 Kaolin
3. Coal
3.1 Operations
3.2 Production
3.3 Customers and sales
3.4 Competition
4. Infrastructure
4.1 Logistics services
4.1.1 Railroads
4.1.2 Ports and maritime terminals
4.1.3 Shipping
4.2. Energy
4.2.1 Electric power
4.2.2 Oil and natural gas
5. Other
investments
22
Our ferrous minerals business includes iron ore mining, iron ore
pellet production, manganese ore mining, ferroalloy production
and a pig iron operation. Each of these activities is described
below.
1.1 Iron
ore
1.1.1
Operations
We conduct our iron ore business in Brazil, primarily at the
parent-company level and through our wholly owned subsidiary
Urucum Mineração S.A. (Urucum). These
mining and related operations are concentrated in three systems:
the Southeastern System, the Southern System and the Northern
System, each with its own transportation capability. In
addition, we conduct mining operations through our joint venture
Samarco.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our share of capital
|
|
|
Company
|
|
System
|
|
Voting
|
|
Total
|
|
Partners
|
|
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vale
|
|
Northern, Southeastern and Southern
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Urucum
|
|
Southeastern
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
Samarco
|
|
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
|
BHP Billiton
|
Southeastern
System
The Southeastern System mines are located in the Iron Quadrangle
region of the state of Minas Gerais, where they are divided into
three mining complexes (Itabira, Minas Centrais and Mariana),
and in the state of Mato Grosso do Sul, where the mines of
Urucum and Corumbá are located.
The ore reserves in the three mining complexes have high ratios
of itabirite ore relative to hematite ore. Itabirite ore has
iron grade of
35-60% and
requires concentration to achieve shipping grade, which is at
least 63.5% average iron grade. Urucum ore reserves have high
ratios of hematite ore, which has an average grade of 63%.
We conduct open-pit mining operations in the Southeastern
System. At the three mining complexes, we generally process the
run-of-mine
by means of standard crushing, classification and concentration
steps, producing sinter feed, lump ore and pellet feed in the
beneficiation plants located at the mining sites. In September
2009, we concluded the acquisition of Corumbá, where we
produce lump ores. At the Urucum and Corumbá mines, we
generally process the
run-of-mine
by means of standard crushing and classification steps,
producing only lump ore. In 2009, we produced 100% of the
electric energy consumed in the Southeastern System at our
hydroelectric power plants (Igarapava, Porto Estrela, Funil,
Candonga, Aimorés, Capim Branco I and Capim Branco II).
We own and operate integrated railroad and terminal networks in
the three mining complexes, which are accessible by road or by
spur tracks of our EFVM railroad. The EFVM railroad connects
these mines to the Tubarão port in Vitória, in the
state of Espírito Santo. For a more detailed description of
the networks, seeLogistics. Urucum and Corumbá
iron ore is delivered to customers by barges through the
Paraguay River.
Southern
System
The Southern System mines are located in the Iron Quadrangle
region of the state of Minas Gerais in Brazil. The mines of our
subsidiary Minerações Brasileiras Reunidas S.A.-MBR
(MBR) are operated at the parent-company level
pursuant to an asset lease agreement. The Southern System has
three major mining complexes: the Minas Itabirito complex
(comprised of four mines, with two major beneficiation plants
and three secondary beneficiation plants); the Vargem Grande
complex (comprised of three mines and one major beneficiation
plant); and the Paraopeba complex (comprised of four mines and
three beneficiation plants).
24
We use wet beneficiation processes to convert
run-of-mine
obtained from open-pit mining operations into sinter feed, lump
ore and pellet feed, in addition to hematitinha, a
product used primarily by Brazilian pig-iron producers. In 2009,
we produced 100% of the electric energy consumed in the Southern
System at our hydroelectric power plants (Igarapava, Porto
Estrela, Funil, Candonga, Capim Branco I and
Capim Branco II).
We enter into freight contracts with our affiliate, MRS, a
railway company in which we own a 41.5% stake, to transport our
iron ore products at market prices from the mines to our
Guaíba Island and Itaguaí maritime terminals in the
state of Rio de Janeiro.
Northern
System
The Northern System mines, located in the Carajás mineral
province of the Brazilian state of Pará, contain some of
the largest iron ore deposits in the world. The reserves are
divided into northern, southern and eastern ranges situated 35
kilometers apart. Since 1985, we have been conducting mining
activities in the northern range, which is divided into three
main mining bodies (N4W, N4E and N5). The Northern System has
open-pit mines and an ore-processing plant. The mines are
located on public lands for which we hold mining concessions.
Because of the high grade (66.7% on average) of the Northern
System deposits, we do not need to operate a concentration plant
at Carajás. The beneficiation process consists simply of
sizing operations, including screening, hydrocycloning, crushing
and filtration. Output from the beneficiation process consists
of sinter feed, pellet feed, special fines for direct reduction
processes and lump ore. We obtain all of the electrical power
for the Northern System at market prices from regional utilities.
We operate an integrated railroad and maritime terminal network
in the Northern System. After completion of the beneficiation
process, our EFC railroad transports the iron ore to the Ponta
da Madeira maritime terminal in the state of Maranhão. To
support our Carajás operations, we have housing and other
facilities in a nearby township. These operations are accessible
by road, air and rail.
Samarco
We own 50% of Samarco, which operates an integrated system,
comprised of a mine, pipeline, three pellet plants and a port.
Samarcos Alegria mine complex, located in Mariana, Minas
Gerais, is in the same region as our Southeastern System.
25
1.1.2
Production
The following table sets forth information about our iron ore
production.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production for the year ended December 31,
|
|
|
Recovery
|
|
Mine/Plant
|
|
Type
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
rate
|
|
|
|
(million metric tons)
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
Southeastern System
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Itabira complex
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cauê(1)
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
24.8
|
|
|
|
21.5
|
|
|
|
13.8
|
|
|
|
65.5
|
|
Conceição(1)
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
21.9
|
|
|
|
20.3
|
|
|
|
17.3
|
|
|
|
74.4
|
|
Minas Centrais complex
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Água Limpa/Cururu(2)
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
51.7
|
|
Gongo Soco
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
88.0
|
|
Brucutu
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
21.9
|
|
|
|
26.4
|
|
|
|
23.6
|
|
|
|
76.0
|
|
Andrade(3)
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
97.9
|
|
Mariana complex
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alegria
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
13.5
|
|
|
|
12.3
|
|
|
|
12.1
|
|
|
|
73.3
|
|
Fábrica Nova(4)
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
14.6
|
|
|
|
14.0
|
|
|
|
13.7
|
|
|
|
77.8
|
|
Fazendão(5)
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
9.8
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
Timbopeba
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corumbá(6)
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
55.0
|
|
Urucum
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
61.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Southeastern System
|
|
|
114.9
|
|
|
|
116.4
|
|
|
|
89.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
Southern System(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minas Itabirito complex
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segredo/João Pereira
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
11.8
|
|
|
|
12.1
|
|
|
|
8.4
|
|
|
|
67.3
|
|
Sapecado/Galinheiro(8)
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
17.4
|
|
|
|
15.1
|
|
|
|
9.8
|
|
|
|
61.9
|
|
Vargem Grande complex
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tamanduá(9)
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
|
|
9.8
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
|
79.6
|
|
Capitão do Mato(9)
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
11.5
|
|
|
|
9.7
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
|
|
79.6
|
|
Abóboras
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
Paraopeba Complex
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jangada
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Córrego do Feijão
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
|
|
|
8.4
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
71.8
|
|
Capão Xavier
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
13.3
|
|
|
|
13.5
|
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
|
|
84.5
|
|
Mar Azul
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Southern System
|
|
|
89.3
|
|
|
|
80.5
|
|
|
|
55.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Northern System
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Serra Norte(10)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N4W
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
40.3
|
|
|
|
44.3
|
|
|
|
31.0
|
|
|
|
92.4
|
|
N4E
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
15.4
|
|
|
|
13.2
|
|
|
|
16.9
|
|
|
|
92.4
|
|
N5(11)
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
36.0
|
|
|
|
39.1
|
|
|
|
36.8
|
|
|
|
92.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Northern System
|
|
|
91.7
|
|
|
|
96.5
|
|
|
|
84.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vale
|
|
|
295.9
|
|
|
|
293.4
|
|
|
|
229.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Samarco(12)
|
|
|
14.5
|
|
|
|
16.6
|
|
|
|
17.2
|
|
|
|
57.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
310.4
|
|
|
|
310.0
|
|
|
|
246.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The
run-of-mine
from Minas do Meio is sent to the Cauê and
Conceição concentration plants.
|
(2)
|
|
Água Limpa/Cururu is owned by
Baovale, in which we own 100% of the voting shares and 50% of
the total shares. Production figures for Água Limpa/Curucu
have not been adjusted to reflect our ownership interest.
|
(3)
|
|
The lease for the Andrade mine was
terminated in 2009.
|
(4)
|
|
Fábrica Nova ore is sent to
the Alegria and Fábrica Nova plants.
|
(5)
|
|
Fazendão ore is sent to the
Alegria plant and Samarco.
|
(6)
|
|
Production relative to 4Q09. On a
pro forma basis, its production reached 2.0 Mt in 2009.
|
(7)
|
|
Former MBR mines were included in
other complexes in the Southern System.
|
(8)
|
|
Galinheiro mine was separated from
the Sapecado mine and includes the Pico mine.
|
(9)
|
|
Tamanduá and Capitão do
Mato ores are processed at the Vargem Grande plant.
|
(10)
|
|
All Serra Norte ores are processed
at the Carajás plant.
|
(11)
|
|
Our former N5E-N and N5-W mines
were incorporated in the N5 reserve model.
|
(12)
|
|
Production figures for Samarco, in
which we have a 50% interest, have not been adjusted to reflect
our ownership interest.
|
26
1.2 Iron
ore pellets
1.2.1
Operations
Directly and through joint ventures, we produce iron ore pellets
in Brazil and in China, as set forth in the following table. The
total estimated nominal capacity of the 10 pellet plants
directly operated by us, including Hispanobras, is
48 million metric tons per year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our share of capital
|
|
|
Company
|
|
Site of operation
|
|
Voting (%)
|
|
Total
|
|
Partners
|
|
|
|
Brazil:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vale
|
|
Tubarão, Fábrica,Vargem
Grande and São Luís
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hispanobras
|
|
Tubarão
|
|
|
51.0
|
|
|
|
50.9
|
|
|
Arcelor Mittal
|
Samarco
|
|
Mariana and Anchieta
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
|
BHP Billiton
|
|
|
China:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zhuhai YPM
|
|
Zhuhai, Guangdong
|
|
|
25.0
|
|
|
|
25.0
|
|
|
Zhuhai Yueyufeng Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. Pioneer Iron and Steel
Group Co. Ltd.
|
In the Tubarão port area, in the Brazilian state of
Espírito Santo, we operate our wholly owned pellet plants,
Tubarão I and II, four plants we lease under operating
leases and our jointly-owned plant, Hispanobras. We send iron
ore from our Southeastern System mines to these plants and use
our logistics infrastructure to distribute their final products.
Our São Luís pellet plant, located in the Brazilian
state of Maranhão, is part of the Northern System. We send
Carajás iron ore to this plant and ship its production to
customers through our Ponta da Madeira maritime terminal.
The Fábrica and Vargem Grande pellet plants, located in the
Brazilian state of Minas Gerais, are part of the Southern
System. We send some of the iron ore from the Fábrica Nova
mine to the Fábrica plant, and iron ore from the Pico mine
to the Vargem Grande plant. We transport pellets from these
plants using MRS.
Samarco operates three pellet plants in two operating sites with
nominal capacity of 21 million tons per year. The pellet
plants are located in the Ponta Ubu unit, in Anchieta,
Espírito Santo. Iron ore from Alegria and our Southeastern
System mine Fábrica Nova is sent to the Samarco pellet
plants using a
396-kilometer
pipeline, the longest pipeline in the world for the conveyance
of iron ore. Samarco has its own port facilities to transport
its production.
The Zhuhai YPM pellet plant, in China, is part of the Yueyufeng
Steelmaking Complex. It has port facilities, which we use to
send feed from our mines in Brazil. Zhuhai YPMs main
customer is Yueyufeng Iron & Steel (YYS),
which is also located in the Yueyufeng Steelmaking Complex.
We sell pellet feed to our pelletizing joint ventures at market
prices. Historically, we have supplied all of the iron ore
requirements of our wholly owned pellet plants and joint
ventures, except for Samarco and Zhuhai YPM, to which we supply
only part of their requirements. Of our total 2009 pellet
production, 58.8% was blast furnace pellets, and the remaining
41.2% was direct reduction pellets, which are used in steel
mills that employ the direct reduction process rather than blast
furnace technology.
27
The following table sets forth information about our iron ore
sales to our pelletizing joint ventures for the periods
indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales for the year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(million metric tons)
|
|
|
Hispanobras
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
Itabrasco
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
Kobrasco
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
Nibrasco
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
Samarco(4)
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
|
|
11.3
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
Zhuhai YPM(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
28.1
|
|
|
|
23.0
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Sales through September 2008. We
signed a
10-year
operating lease for Itabrascos pellet plant in October
2008.
|
(2)
|
|
Sales through May 2008. We signed a
five-year operating lease for Kobrascos pellet plant in
June 2008.
|
(3)
|
|
Sales through April 2008. We signed
a 30-year
operating lease for Nibrascos two pellet plants in May
2008.
|
(4)
|
|
In 2007, we sold 1.9 million
metric tons of concentrate and 5.2 million metric tons of
run-of-mine;
in 2008, we sold 1.8 million metric tons of concentrate and
9.5 million metric tons of
run-of-mine;
and in 2009, we sold 1.1 million metric tons of concentrate
and 3.8 million metric tons of
run-of-mine.
|
(5)
|
|
Zhuhai YPM started operations in
January 2008.
|
1.2.2
Production
The following table sets forth information about our iron ore
pellet production. The table reflects 100% of production at each
facility.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production for the year ended December 31,
|
|
Company
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(million metric tons)
|
|
|
Vale(1)
|
|
|
17.6
|
|
|
|
26.6
|
|
|
|
15.3
|
|
Hispanobras(5)
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
Itabrasco(2)
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kobrasco(3)
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nibrasco(4)
|
|
|
9.0
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
Samarco(5)
|
|
|
14.3
|
|
|
|
17.1
|
|
|
|
16.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
53.7
|
|
|
|
55.2
|
|
|
|
32.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Figure includes actual production,
including production from the four pellet plants we leased in
2008.
|
(2)
|
|
Production through September 2008.
We signed a
10-year
operating lease contract for Itabrascos pellet plant in
October 2008.
|
(3)
|
|
Production through May 2008. We
signed a five-year operating lease contract for Kobrascos
pellet plant in June 2008.
|
(4)
|
|
Production through April 2008. We
signed a
30-year
operating lease contract for Nibrascos two pellet plants
in May 2008.
|
(5)
|
|
Production figures for Hispanobras
and Samarco have not been adjusted to reflect our ownership
interest.
|
1.3 Iron
ore and iron ore pellets
1.3.1
Customers, sales and marketing
We supply all of our iron ore and iron ore pellets (including
our share of joint-venture pellet production) to the steel
industry. Prevailing and expected levels of demand for steel
products affect demand for our iron ore and iron ore pellets.
Demand for steel products is influenced by many factors, such as
global manufacturing production, civil construction and
infrastructure spending. For further information about demand
and prices, see Operating and financial review and
prospectsDemand and prices.
In 2009, China accounted for 56.8% of our iron ore and iron ore
pellet shipments, and Asia as a whole accounted for 72.7%.
Europe accounted for 13.4%, followed by Brazil with 10.2%. Our
10 largest customers collectively purchased 96.6 million
metric tons of iron ore and iron ore pellets from us,
representing 39% of our 2009 iron ore and iron ore pellet
shipments and 38% of our total iron ore and iron ore pellet
revenues. In 2009, no individual customer accounted for more
than 10.0% of our iron ore and iron ore pellet shipments.
28
In 2009, the Asian market (mainly Japan and South Korea) and the
European market were the primary markets for our blast furnace
pellets, while North America, the Middle East and North Africa
were the primary markets for our direct reduction pellets.
We strongly emphasize customer service in order to improve our
competitiveness. We work with our customers to understand their
main objectives and to provide them with iron ore solutions to
meet specific customer needs. Using our expertise in mining,
agglomeration and iron-making processes, we search for technical
solutions that will balance the best use of our world-class
mining assets and the satisfaction of our customers. We believe
that our ability to provide customers with a total iron ore
solution and the quality of our products are very important
advantages helping us to improve our competitiveness in relation
to competitors who may be more conveniently located
geographically. In addition to offering technical assistance to
our customers, we operate sales support offices in Tokyo
(Japan), Seoul (South Korea), Singapore, Muscat (Oman) and
Shanghai (China), which support the sales made by our wholly
owned subsidiary located in St. Prex, Switzerland. These offices
also allow us to stay in close contact with our customers,
monitor their requirements and our contract performance, and
ensure that our customers receive timely deliveries.
1.3.2
Competition
The global iron ore and iron ore pellet markets are highly
competitive. The main factors affecting competition are price,
quality, range of products offered, reliability, operating costs
and shipping costs.
Our biggest competitors in the Asian market are located in
Australia and include subsidiaries and affiliates of BHP
Billiton plc and Rio Tinto Ltd. Although the transportation
costs of delivering iron ore from Australia to Asian customers
are generally lower than ours as a result of Australias
geographical proximity, we are competitive in the Asian market
for two main reasons. First, steel companies generally seek to
obtain the types (or blends) of iron ore and iron ore pellets
that can produce the intended final product in the most economic
and efficient manner. Our iron ore has low impurity levels and
other properties that generally lead to lower processing costs.
For example, in addition to its high grade, the alumina grade of
our iron ore is very low compared to Australian ores, reducing
consumption of coke and increasing productivity in blast
furnaces, which is particularly important during periods of high
demand. When the market is very strong, our quality differential
is in many cases more valuable to customers than a freight
differential. Second, steel companies often develop sales
relationships based on a reliable supply of a specific mix of
iron ore and iron ore pellets. We have a customer-oriented
marketing policy and place specialized personnel in direct
contact with our customers to help determine the blend that best
suits each particular customer.
In terms of reliability, our ownership and operation of
logistics facilities in the Northern and Southeastern Systems
help us ensure that our products are delivered on time and at a
relatively low cost. In addition, we are developing a low-cost
freight portfolio, aimed at enhancing our ability to offer our
products in the Asian market at competitive prices and to
increase our market share. To support this strategy, we ordered
new ships, purchased used vessels and entered into medium- and
long-term freight contracts.
Our principal competitors in Europe are Kumba Iron Ore Limited,
Luossavaara Kiirunavaara AB (LKAB),
Société Nationale Industrielle et Minière
(SNIM), Rio Tinto Ltd. and BHP Billiton. We are
competitive in the European market not only for the same reasons
we are competitive in Asia, but also due to the proximity of our
port facilities to European customers.
The Brazilian iron ore market is also competitive. There are
several small iron ore producers and new companies with
developing projects, such as Anglo Ferrous Brazil, MMX, MHAG and
Bahia Mineração. At the same time, there are
vertically integrated steel companies such as Companhia
Siderúrgica Nacional (CSN) and V&M do
Brasil S.A. (Mannesmann). Usiminas has become
partially integrated with the acquisition of an iron ore
company. Although pricing is relevant, quality and reliability
are important competitive factors as well. We believe that our
integrated transportation systems, high-quality ore and
technical services make us a strong competitor in the Brazilian
market.
29
With respect to pellets, our major competitors are LKAB,
Cleveland-Cliffs Inc., Quebec Cartier Mining Co., Iron Ore
Company of Canada (a subsidiary of Rio Tinto Ltd.) and Gulf
Industrial Investment Co.
1.4
Manganese ore
We conduct our manganese mining operations in Brazil through our
wholly owned subsidiaries Vale Manganês S.A. (Vale
Manganês) and Urucum.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our share of capital
|
Company
|
|
Location
|
|
Voting
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
|
Brazil:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vale Manganês(1)
|
|
Pará and Minas Gerais
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Urucum
|
|
Mato Grosso do Sul
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Vale Manganêss mines are
Azul and Morro da Mina.
|
Our mines produce three types of manganese ore products:
|
|
|
|
|
metallurgical ore, used primarily for the production of
ferroalloys;
|
|
|
|
natural manganese dioxide, suitable for the manufacture of
electrolytic batteries; and
|
|
|
|
chemical ore, used in several industries for the production of
fertilizer, pesticides and animal feed, and used as a pigment in
the ceramics industry.
|
We operate
on-site
beneficiation plants at our Azul mine and at the Urucum mines,
which are accessible by road. The Azul and Urucum mines have
high-grade ores (at least 40% manganese grade), while our Morro
da Mina mine has low-grade ores. All of these mines obtain
electrical power at market prices from regional electric
utilities. The following table sets forth information about our
manganese production.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production for the year ended December 31,
|
|
|
Recovery
|
|
Mine
|
|
Type
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
rate
|
|
|
|
(million metric tons)
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
Azul(1)
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
62.4
|
|
Morro da Mina
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
93.2
|
|
Urucum(2)
|
|
Underground
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
83.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Given the need to prioritize iron
ore transportation through the EFC railroad, we shut down the
Azul mine from July to December 2007.
|
(2)
|
|
Urucum has a five-year renewable
lease agreement with CPFL for its plant in Corumbá, in the
Brazilian state of Mato Grosso do Sul.
|
1.5
Ferroalloys
The following table sets forth the subsidiaries through which we
conduct our ferroalloys business.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our share of capital
|
Company
|
|
Location
|
|
Voting
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
Vale Manganês
|
|
Minas Gerais and Bahia, Brazil
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Urucum
|
|
Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Vale Manganèse France
|
|
Dunkerque, France
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Vale Manganese Norway AS
|
|
Mo I Rana, Norway
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
We produce several types of manganese ferroalloys, such as high
carbon and medium carbon ferro-manganese and ferro-silicon
manganese. Our facilities have nominal capacity of 651,000
metric tons per year. The production of ferroalloys consumes
significant amounts of electricity, representing 4.8% of our
total
30
consumption in 2009. The electricity supply for our ferroalloy
plant in Dunkerque, France and Mo I Rana, Norway are provided
through long-term contracts. For information on the risks
associated with potential energy shortages, see Risk
factors.
The following table sets forth information about our ferroalloys
production.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production for the year ended December 31,
|
|
Company
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(thousand metric tons)
|
|
|
Vale Manganês(1)
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
Urucum(2)
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Vale Manganèse France(3)
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
Vale Manganese Norway AS
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
542
|
|
|
|
475
|
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Vale Manganês has five plants
in Brazil: Santa Rita, Barbacena and Ouro Preto in the state of
Minas Gerais; and Simões Filho in the state of Bahia. We
sold Vale Manganêss São João del-Rei plant
in June 2007.
|
(2)
|
|
Urucum has one plant in
Corumbá in the Brazilian state of Mato Grosso do Sul.
|
(3)
|
|
From August to October 2007, we
shut down our furnace at Vale Manganèse France due to
technical problems. We shut it down again in August 2008 due to
technical problems, and it was restarted in September 2009.
|
1.6
Manganese ore and ferroalloys: sales and competition
The markets for manganese ore and ferroalloys are highly
competitive. Competition in the manganese ore market takes place
in two segments. High-grade manganese ore competes on a global
seaborne basis, while low-grade ore competes on a regional
basis. For some ferroalloys, high-grade ore is mandatory, while
for others high- and low-grade ores are complementary. The main
suppliers of high-grade ores are located in South Africa, Gabon,
Australia and Brazil. The main producers of low-grade ores are
located in Ukraine, China, Ghana, Kazakhstan, India and Mexico.
The ferroalloy market is characterized by a large number of
participants who compete primarily on the basis of price. The
principal competitive factors in this market are the costs of
manganese ore, electricity and logistics and reductants. We
compete both with stand-alone producers and integrated producers
that also mine their own ore. Our competitors are located
principally in countries that produce manganese ore or steel.
For further information about demand and prices, see
Operating and financial review and prospectsDemand and
prices.
1.7 Pig
iron
We conduct a pig iron operation in northern
Brazil. This operation was conducted through our
wholly owned subsidiary Ferro-Gusa Carajás S.A.
(FGC) until April 2008, when FGC was merged into
Vale.
We utilize two conventional mini-blast furnaces to produce
350,000 metric tons of pig iron per year, using iron ore from
our Carajás mines in northern Brazil. The charcoal source
is exclusively from eucalyptus trees grown in a cultivated
forest of 82,000 acres, with the total project encompassing
200,000 acres. In July 2009, we sold this forest to Suzano
Papel e Celulose (Suzano) but retained a sufficient
wood inventory to keep the mini blast furnaces operating through
the first half of 2012.
31
2.1
Nickel
2.1.1
Operations
We conduct our nickel operations primarily through our wholly
owned subsidiary Vale Inco. Vale Inco operates two nickel
production systems, one in North America and Europe and the
other in Asia and the South Pacific, as set forth in the
following table.
|
|
|
|
|
System
|
|
Location
|
|
Operations
|
|
North America & Europe
|
|
Canada Sudbury, Ontario
|
|
Fully integrated mines, mill, smelter and refinery (producer of
intermediates and finished nickel and by-products)
|
|
|
Canada Thompson, Manitoba
|
|
Fully integrated mines, mill, smelter and refinery (producer of
finished nickel and by-products)
|
|
|
Canada Voisey Bay, Newfoundland and Labrador
|
|
Mine and mill (producer of nickel concentrates and by-products)
|
|
|
U.K. Clydach, Wales
|
|
Stand-alone nickel refinery (producer of finished nickel)
|
Asia & the South Pacific
|
|
Indonesia Sorowako, Sulawesi(1)
|
|
Mining and processing operations (producer of nickel matte, an
intermediate product)
|
|
|
New Caledonia Southern Province (2)
|
|
Mining and processing operations (producer of nickel oxide and
cobalt)
|
|
|
Japan Matsuzaka(3)
|
|
Stand-alone nickel refinery (producer of finished nickel)
|
|
|
Taiwan Kaoshiung(4)
|
|
Stand-alone nickel refinery (producer of finished nickel)
|
|
|
China Dalian, Liaoning(5)
|
|
Stand-alone nickel refinery (producer of finished nickel)
|
|
|
South Korea Onsan(6)
|
|
Stand-alone nickel refinery (producer of finished nickel)
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Operations conducted through our
59.1%-owned subsidiary PT International Nickel Indonesia Tbk.
|
(2)
|
|
Operations conducted though our
74%-owned subsidiary Vale Inco Nouvelle-Calédonie S.A.S.
|
(3)
|
|
Operations conducted through our
76%-owned subsidiary Vale Inco Japan Limited.
|
(4)
|
|
Operations conducted through our
49.9%-owned subsidiary Taiwan Nickel Refining Corporation.
|
(5)
|
|
Operations conducted through our
98.3%-owned subsidiary Vale Inco New Nickel Materials (Dalian)
Co. Ltd.
|
(6)
|
|
Operations conducted through our
25% interest in Korea Nickel Corporation.
|
North
America & Europe
Sudbury
operations
Our long-established mines in Sudbury, Ontario, are primarily
underground operations with nickel sulfide ore bodies. These ore
bodies also contain co-deposits of copper, cobalt, PGMs, gold
and silver. We have integrated mining, milling, smelting and
refining operations to process ore into finished nickel at
Sudbury. We also smelt and refine nickel concentrates from our
Voisey Bay operations. We ship a nickel intermediate product,
nickel oxide, from our Sudbury smelter to our nickel refineries
in Wales, Taiwan, China and South Korea for processing into
finished nickel. In 2009, we produced 31% of the electric energy
consumed in Sudbury at our hydroelectric power plants there. The
remaining electricity was purchased from Ontarios
provincial electricity grid.
In July 2009, unionized maintenance and production employees at
our Sudbury operations went on strike after rejecting a
settlement offer for a new three-year collective bargaining
agreement. We partially resumed production in September 2009,
with a focus on copper. We are operating two high-copper mining
zones and our Clarabelle Mill to produce copper concentrates.
During the first quarter of 2010, we shifted our focus to nickel
and partially resumed operations at the Garson and Coleman mines
and the Copper Cliff smelter in Sudbury from which we send feed
to the Clydach Refinery.
On March 31, 2009, members of USW Local
2020-005,
that represents office, technical and professional employees,
ratified a new three-year collective agreement with us. This
agreement includes increases to salaries in each of the three
years, a defined contribution pension plan for new employees and
the
32
introduction of an annual incentive plan that supports the
achievement of strategic objectives and rewards performance and
various other improvements to collective agreement language.
Thompson
operations
Our long-established mines in Thompson, Manitoba, are primarily
underground operations with nickel sulfide ore bodies. The ore
bodies also contain co-deposits of copper and cobalt. We have
integrated mining, milling, smelting and refining operations to
process ore into finished nickel at Thompson. We also smelt and
refine an intermediate product, nickel concentrate, from our
Voisey Bay operations. Low-cost energy is available from
purchased hydroelectric power at our Thompson operations.
Voisey
Bay operations
Our Voisey Bay operation in Newfoundland and Labrador is
comprised of Ovoid, an open-pit mine, and deposits with the
potential for underground operations at a later stage. We mine
nickel sulfide ore bodies, which also contain co-deposits of
copper and cobalt. We mill Voisey Bay ore on site and ship it as
an intermediate product (nickel concentrates) primarily to our
Sudbury and Thompson operations for final processing (smelting
and refining). The electricity requirements of our Voisey Bay
operations are supplied through diesel generators.
In August 2009, our unionized employees at our Voisey Bay
operations went on strike after rejecting a settlement offer for
a new three-year collective bargaining agreement. During the
first quarter of 2010, we resumed production at the Voisey Bay
Ovoid mine and the mill, which supplies nickel concentrates to
our operations in Thompson, Manitoba and Sudbury, Ontario and
copper concentrates to customers in Europe.
Clydach
operations
Clydach is a stand-alone nickel refinery in the U.K. that
processes a nickel intermediate product, nickel oxide, supplied
from our operations to produce finished nickel in the form of
powders and pellets.
Asia &
the South Pacific
Sulawesi
operations
Our subsidiary PTI operates an open cast mining area and related
processing facility in Sorowako on the Island of Sulawesi,
Indonesia. PTI mines nickel laterite saprolite ore and produces
an intermediate product (nickel matte), which is shipped
primarily to our nickel refinery in Japan. Pursuant to
life-of-mine
off-take agreements, PTI sells 80% of its production to our
wholly owned subsidiary Vale Inco and 20% of its production to
Sumitomo Metal Mining Co., Ltd. (Sumitomo). PTI is a
public company whose shares are traded on the Indonesia Stock
Exchange. We hold 59.1% of its share capital, Sumitomo holds
20.1%, 20.1% is publicly held and 0.7% is held by others.
Energy costs are a significant component of our nickel
production costs for the processing of lateritic ores at our PTI
operations in Indonesia. A major part of the electric furnace
power requirements of PTI is supplied at low cost by its two
hydroelectric power plants on the Larona River, Larona and
Balambano. PTI has thermal generating facilities in order to
supplement its hydroelectric power supply with a source of
energy that is not subject to hydrological factors. In 2009, the
hydroelectric power plants provided 96% of the electric energy
consumed at our Indonesian operations, and the thermal
generators provided the remainder.
We have committed to maintain a minimum 20% public float of PTI
shares. In furtherance of this commitment, in August 2009 we
sold, for US$88 million, 2.07% of PTIs outstanding
shares (205,680,000 shares).
33
Asian
refinery operations
Our 76%-owned subsidiary Vale Inco Japan Limited operates a
refinery in Matsuzaka, which produces intermediate and finished
nickel products, primarily using nickel matte sourced from PTI.
Vale Inco Japan is a private company. The minority interest is
held by Sumitomo (13%), Mitsui & Co., Ltd. (7%) and
other Japanese companies (4%).
We also operate or have investments in nickel refining
operations in Taiwan through our 49.9% stake in Taiwan Nickel
Refining Corporation (TNRC), China through our 98.3%
interest in Vale Inco New Nickel Materials (Dalian) Co. Ltd.
(VINNM) and South Korea through our 25% stake in
Korea Nickel Corporation (KNC). TNRC, INNM and KNC
produce finished nickel for the local stainless steel industry
in Taiwan, China and South Korea, primarily using intermediate
products containing about 75% nickel (in the form of nickel
oxide) from Vale Inco Japan and our Sudbury operations. These
refining operations are expected to start receiving nickel oxide
from Goro in 2010.
New
Caledonian operations
We are in the initial stage of ramping up our Goro nickel
project in New Caledonia in the South Pacific. Goro utilizes a
High Pressure Acid Leach (HPAL) process to treat
laterite ores. The construction of the project is complete and
commissioning is underway. We expect to
ramp-up Goro
over a three-year period to reach nominal production capacity of
60,000 metric tons per year of nickel contained in nickel oxide
and 4,600 metric tons of cobalt.
Other
operations
We process and sell nickel powders through our wholly owned
subsidiary Novamet Specialty Products Corporation, in Wyckoff,
New Jersey (United States).
2.1.2
Production
The following table sets forth our annual mine production by
operating mine (or on an aggregate basis for PTI because it has
mining areas rather than mines) and the average percentage
grades of nickel and copper. The mine production at PTI
represents the product from PTIs dryer kilns delivered to
PTIs smelting operations and does not include nickel
losses due to smelting. For our Sudbury, Thompson and Voisey Bay
operations, the production and average grades represent the mine
product delivered to those operations respective
processing plants and do not include adjustments due to
beneficiation, smelting or refining. The following table sets
forth information about ore production at our nickel mining
sites.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(thousands of metric tons, except percentages)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
Production
|
|
|
Copper
|
|
|
Nickel
|
|
|
Production
|
|
|
Copper
|
|
|
Nickel
|
|
|
Production
|
|
|
Copper
|
|
|
Nickel
|
|
|
Ontario operating mines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copper Cliff North
|
|
|
1,078
|
|
|
|
0.92
|
|
|
|
0.84
|
|
|
|
1,165
|
|
|
|
1.01
|
|
|
|
1.01
|
|
|
|
524
|
|
|
|
0.96
|
|
|
|
1.06
|
|
Copper Cliff South(1)
|
|
|
883
|
|
|
|
1.71
|
|
|
|
1.46
|
|
|
|
771
|
|
|
|
1.67
|
|
|
|
1.48
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
1.45
|
|
|
|
1.40
|
|
Creighton
|
|
|
963
|
|
|
|
1.62
|
|
|
|
2.08
|
|
|
|
1,001
|
|
|
|
1.56
|
|
|
|
2.14
|
|
|
|
395
|
|
|
|
1.57
|
|
|
|
1.82
|
|
Stobie
|
|
|
2,850
|
|
|
|
0.68
|
|
|
|
0.72
|
|
|
|
2,892
|
|
|
|
0.65
|
|
|
|
0.72
|
|
|
|
1,198
|
|
|
|
0.64
|
|
|
|
0.72
|
|
Garson
|
|
|
692
|
|
|
|
1.58
|
|
|
|
1.59
|
|
|
|
840
|
|
|
|
1.72
|
|
|
|
1.69
|
|
|
|
328
|
|
|
|
1.93
|
|
|
|
1.45
|
|
Coleman
|
|
|
1,408
|
|
|
|
2.75
|
|
|
|
1.74
|
|
|
|
1,425
|
|
|
|
2.66
|
|
|
|
1.62
|
|
|
|
624
|
|
|
|
3.28
|
|
|
|
1.64
|
|
Gertrude
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
0.66
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
0.29
|
|
|
|
0.72
|
|
|
|
−
|
|
|
|
−
|
|
|
|
−
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Ontario operations
|
|
|
7,887
|
|
|
|
1.39
|
%
|
|
|
1.25
|
%
|
|
|
8,219
|
|
|
|
1.36
|
%
|
|
|
1.26
|
%
|
|
|
3,145
|
|
|
|
1.49
|
|
|
|
1.19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manitoba operating mines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thompson
|
|
|
1,380
|
|
|
|
−
|
|
|
|
1.83
|
|
|
|
1,320
|
|
|
|
−
|
|
|
|
1.77
|
|
|
|
1,270
|
|
|
|
−
|
|
|
|
1.98
|
|
Birchtree
|
|
|
1,164
|
|
|
|
−
|
|
|
|
1.52
|
|
|
|
971
|
|
|
|
−
|
|
|
|
1.51
|
|
|
|
769
|
|
|
|
−
|
|
|
|
1.48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Manitoba operations
|
|
|
2,545
|
|
|
|
−
|
|
|
|
1.69
|
%
|
|
|
2,291
|
|
|
|
−
|
|
|
|
1.66
|
%
|
|
|
2,040
|
|
|
|
−
|
|
|
|
1.79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voisey Bay operating mines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ovoid
|
|
|
2,147
|
|
|
|
2.47
|
|
|
|
3.74
|
|
|
|
2,385
|
|
|
|
2.38
|
|
|
|
3.50
|
|
|
|
990
|
|
|
|
2.57
|
|
|
|
3.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Voisey Bay operations
|
|
|
2,147
|
|
|
|
2.47
|
%
|
|
|
3.74
|
%
|
|
|
2,385
|
|
|
|
2.38
|
%
|
|
|
3.50
|
%
|
|
|
990
|
|
|
|
2.57
|
|
|
|
3.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sulawesi operating mining areas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sorowako
|
|
|
4,615
|
|
|
|
−
|
|
|
|
2.03
|
|
|
|
4,258
|
|
|
|
−
|
|
|
|
2.08
|
|
|
|
3,598
|
|
|
|
−
|
|
|
|
2.02
|
|
Pomalaa(2)
|
|
|
645
|
|
|
|
−
|
|
|
|
2.30
|
|
|
|
417
|
|
|
|
−
|
|
|
|
2.29
|
|
|
|
−
|
|
|
|
−
|
|
|
|
−
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Sulawesi operations
|
|
|
5,260
|
|
|
|
−
|
|
|
|
2.06
|
%
|
|
|
4,675
|
|
|
|
−
|
|
|
|
2.10
|
%
|
|
|
3,598
|
|
|
|
−
|
|
|
|
2.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
This mine has been closed
indefinitely since January 2009.
|
(2)
|
|
This mine has been closed
indefinitely since May 2008.
|
The following table sets forth information about our nickel
production, including: (i) nickel refined through our
facilities, (ii) nickel further refined into specialty
products, and (iii) intermediates designated for sale. The
numbers below are reported on an ore-source basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production for the year ended December 31,
|
|
Mine
|
|
Type
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(thousand metric tons)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sudbury(1)
|
|
Underground
|
|
|
70.7
|
|
|
|
85.3
|
|
|
|
43.6
|
|
Thompson(1)
|
|
Underground
|
|
|
29.8
|
|
|
|
28.9
|
|
|
|
28.8
|
|
Voisey Bay(2)
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
58.9
|
|
|
|
77.5
|
|
|
|
39.7
|
|
Sorowako(3)
|
|
Open cast
|
|
|
75.8
|
|
|
|
68.3
|
|
|
|
68.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
External(4)
|
|
−
|
|
|
12.7
|
|
|
|
15.4
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total(5)
|
|
|
247.9
|
|
|
|
275.4
|
|
|
|
186.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Primary nickel production only
(i.e., does not include secondary nickel from unrelated parties).
|
(2)
|
|
Includes finished nickel produced
at our Sudbury and Thompson operations, as well as some finished
nickel produced by unrelated parties under toll-smelting and
toll-refining arrangements.
|
(3)
|
|
We have a 59.1% interest in PTI,
which owns the Sorowako mines, and these figures include the
minority interests.
|
(4)
|
|
Finished nickel processed at our
facilities using feeds purchased from unrelated parties.
|
(5)
|
|
Excludes finished nickel produced
under toll-smelting and refining arrangements covering purchased
intermediates with unrelated parties. Unrelated-party tolling of
purchased intermediates was 14.2 thousand metric tons in 2007,
7.5 thousand metric tons in 2008 and 5.2 thousand metric tons in
2009.
|
35
2.1.3
Customers and sales
Our nickel customers are broadly distributed on a global basis.
In 2009, 65.3% of our total nickel sales were delivered to
customers in Asia, 21.9% to North America, 11.7% to Europe and
1.1% to other markets. We have short-term fixed-volume contracts
with customers for the majority of our expected annual nickel
sales. These contracts generally provide stable demand for a
significant portion of our annual production.
Nickel is an exchange-traded metal, listed on the London Metal
Exchange (LME), and most nickel products are priced
according to a discount or premium to the LME price, depending
on the nickel products physical and technical
characteristics. Our finished nickel products represent what is
known in the industry as primary nickel, meaning
nickel produced principally from nickel ores (as opposed to
secondary nickel, which is recovered from recycled
nickel-containing material). Finished primary nickel products
are distinguishable in terms of the following characteristics,
which determine the product price level and the suitability for
various end-use applications:
|
|
|
|
|
nickel content and purity level: (i) intermediates with
various levels of nickel content, (ii) nickel pig iron has
1.5-6% nickel, (iii) ferro-nickel has
10-40%
nickel, (iv) standard LME grade nickel has a minimum of
99.8% nickel, and (v) high purity nickel has a minimum of
99.9% nickel and does not contain specific elemental impurities;
|
|
|
|
shape (such as pellets, discs, squares, strips and
foams); and
|
|
|
|
size.
|
In 2009, the principal end-use applications for nickel were:
|
|
|
|
|
austenitic stainless steel
(60-65% of
global nickel consumption);
|
|
|
|
non-ferrous alloys, alloy steels and foundry applications
(15-20% of
global nickel consumption);
|
|
|
|
nickel plating (9% of global nickel consumption); and
|
|
|
|
specialty applications, such as batteries, chemicals and powder
metallurgy (5-10% of global nickel consumption).
|
In 2009, 59% of our refined nickel sales were made into
non-stainless steel applications, compared to the industry
average for primary nickel producers of 35%. As a result of our
focus on such higher-value segments, our average realized nickel
prices for refined nickel have typically exceeded LME cash
nickel prices.
We offer sales and technical support to our customers on a
global basis. We have a well-established global marketing
network for finished nickel, based at our head office in
Toronto, Canada. We also have sales offices in Saddle Brook, New
Jersey (United States), London (England), St. Prex
(Switzerland), Tokyo (Japan), Hong Kong, Shanghai (China),
Kaohsiung (Taiwan), Bangkok (Thailand) and Bridgetown
(Barbados). For information about demand and prices, see below
Operating and financial review and prospects
Demand and prices.
2.1.4
Competition
The global nickel market is highly competitive. Our key
competitive strengths include our long-life mines, our low cash
costs of production relative to other nickel producers, and
sophisticated exploration and processing technologies. Our
global marketing reach, diverse product mix, and technical
support direct our products to the applications and geographic
regions that offer the highest margins for our products.
36
Our nickel deliveries represented 17% of global consumption for
primary nickel in 2009. In addition to us, the largest suppliers
in the nickel industry (each with its own integrated facilities,
including nickel mining, processing, refining and marketing
operations) are Mining and Metallurgical Company Norilsk Nickel,
Jinchuan Nonferrous Metals Corporation, BHP Billiton plc and
Xstrata plc. Together with us, these companies accounted for
about 58% of global finished primary nickel production in 2009.
While stainless steel production is a major driver of global
nickel demand, stainless steel producers can use nickel products
with a wide range of nickel content, including secondary nickel
(scrap). The choice between primary and secondary nickel is
largely based on their relative prices and availability. In
recent years, secondary nickel has accounted for about
43-49% of
total nickel used for stainless steels, and primary nickel has
accounted for about
51-57%. In
2006, a new primary nickel product entered the market, known as
nickel pig iron. This is a low-grade nickel product made in
China from imported lateritic ores (primarily from the
Philippines and Indonesia) that is suitable primarily for use in
stainless steel production. In 2009, Chinese nickel pig iron and
ferro-nickel production totaled an estimated 94,500 metric tons,
representing 7% of world primary nickel supply.
Competition in the nickel market is based primarily on quality,
reliability of supply and price. We believe our operations are
competitive in the nickel market because of the high quality of
our nickel products and our relatively low production costs.
2.2
Aluminum
We operate our aluminum businesses at the parent-company level
and through subsidiaries and joint ventures, as set forth in the
following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our share of capital
|
|
|
|
Company
|
|
Business
|
|
|
Voting
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Partners
|
|
|
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
|
|
Vale (Paragominas mine)
|
|
|
Bauxite
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
MRN
|
|
|
Bauxite
|
|
|
|
40.0
|
|
|
|
40.0
|
|
|
Rio Tinto Alcan Brasil Ltda.,
BHP Billiton Metais S.A.,
Companhia Brasileira de Alumínio,
Alcoa Alumínio S.A., Alcoa World
Alumina LLC,
Alcoa World Alumina Brasil
Participações Ltda. and
Norsk Hydro Brasil Ltda.
|
Alunorte
|
|
|
Alumina
|
|
|
|
59.0
|
|
|
|
57.0
|
|
|
Hydro Aluminum Brasil Investment BV,
Companhia Brasileira de Alumínio,
Nippon Amazon Aluminum Co., Ltd.,
Japan Alunorte Investment Co., Ltd. and
Mitsui & Co., Ltd.
|
CAP
|
|
|
Alumina
|
|
|
|
61.0
|
|
|
|
61.0
|
|
|
Hydro Aluminum Para BV and Dubai
Aluminum Company Limited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Albras
|
|
|
Aluminum
|
|
|
|
51.0
|
|
|
|
51.0
|
|
|
Nippon Amazon Aluminum Co., Ltd.
|
Valesul(1)
|
|
|
Aluminum
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
In January 2010, Valesul entered
into an agreement to sell its aluminum assets.
|
2.2.1
Bauxite
We conduct our bauxite operations through our joint venture
Mineração Rio do Norte S.A. (MRN) and at
the parent-company level.
|
|
|
|
|
MRN. MRN, which is located in the northern
region of the Brazilian state of Pará, is one of the
largest bauxite operations in the world, operating four open-pit
bauxite mines that produce high quality bauxite. In addition,
MRN controls substantial additional high quality bauxite
reserves.
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
MRN also operates ore beneficiation facilities at its mines,
which are connected by rail to a loading terminal and port
facilities on the Trombetas River, a tributary of the Amazon
River, that can handle vessels of up to 60,000 deadweight tons
(DWT). MRN owns and operates the rail and the port facilities
serving its mines. The MRN mines are accessible by road from the
port area and obtain electricity from their own thermal power
plant.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paragominas mine. Operations at our
Paragominas mine, in the Brazilian state of Pará, began in
the first quarter of 2007 to supply Alunortes alumina
refinery. The first expansion of Paragominas (Paragominas
II) was concluded in the second quarter of 2008. The mine
produces a wet 12% moisture bauxite, and the bauxite quality is
similar to that of MRN. The Paragominas site has a beneficiation
plant with milling and a
244-kilometer
slurry pipeline. We obtain electricity from Eletronorte, a
state-owned power generation company in Brazil.
|
The following table sets forth information about bauxite ore
production at our mining sites.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production for the year ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mine(1)
|
|
Type
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Recovery rate
|
|
|
|
(million metric tons)
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
MRN
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Almeidas
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aviso
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
14.4
|
|
|
|
14.5
|
|
|
|
13.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
Saracá V
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
Saracá W
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total MRN
|
|
|
24.8
|
|
|
|
24.2
|
|
|
|
20.7
|
|
|
|
72-77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paragominas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miltonia 3
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
These figures represent
run-of-mine
production.
|
The following table sets forth information about our bauxite
production.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production for the year ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mine
|
|
Type
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
Recovery rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(million metric tons)
|
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
MRN
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
18.1
|
|
|
|
18.1
|
|
|
|
15.6
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
Paragominas
|
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
2.2.2
Alumina
We conduct our alumina operations in Brazil, through our
subsidiary Alunorte Alumina do Norte do Brasil S.A.
(Alunorte), which produces alumina by refining
bauxite supplied by MRN and the Paragominas mine. The Alunorte
plant is the largest alumina refinery in the world, with a
nominal production capacity of 6.3 million metric tons per
year, after the last expansion concluded in the second quarter
of 2008.
Alunorte sells alumina to our subsidiary Albras
Alumínio Brasileiro S.A. (Albras), its
principal customer, and to unaffiliated customers. Albras
aluminum production facilities are located nearby, in the city
38
of Barcarena in the state of Pará, and Alunorte and Albras
share infrastructure and other resources. The following table
sets forth information on our alumina production.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production for the year ended December 31,
|
Company
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
(million metric tons)
|
|
|
|
Alunorte
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
2.2.3
Aluminum
We conduct our aluminum operations in Brazil through our
subsidiary Albras. The Albras smelter, located in Barcarena, in
the state of Pará, is one of the largest aluminum plants in
the Americas, with a nominal capacity of 455,000 metric tons per
year. Albras produces aluminum using alumina supplied by
Alunorte. Alunorte supplied 100% of Albras alumina
requirements in 2009. Albras produces pure metal ingots.
Aluminum is produced from alumina by means of a continuous
electro-chemical process, which requires substantial amounts of
electricity. Albras purchases electric power from Eletronorte, a
state-owned power generating facility. Eletronorte generates
electricity at the Tucuruí hydroelectric power plant
located on the Tocantins River. This plant is the sole source of
electrical power in the region in the quantities required for
Albras operations. Albras consumes approximately one-fifth
of the non-peak period output of the Tucuruí plant.
The following table sets forth information on our aluminum and
aluminum alloys production.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production for the year ended December 31,
|
|
Company
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(thousand metric tons)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Albras
|
|
|
455
|
|
|
|
455
|
|
|
|
450
|
|
Valesul(1)
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
551
|
|
|
|
543
|
|
|
|
459
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
In January 2010, we entered into an
agreement to sell Valesuls aluminum assets (in the
Brailian state of Rio de Janeiro) for US$31.2 million. In
2007, 2008 and 2009, Valesul recycled 13,000, 15,000 and 18,000
metric tons, respectively, of aluminum scrap from unrelated
parties. As of April 1, 2009, Valesul ceased its aluminum
smelting operations and began production of billets for
extrusion, using purchased aluminum ingots and scrap as its main
raw materials. It produced 25,800 metric tons of billets in 2009.
|
2.2.4
Customers and sales
Bauxite. MRN produces bauxite for sale on a
take-or-pay
basis to the joint venture partners. Excess production may be
sold to customers. The joint venture partners pay a price that
is determined by a formula linked to the price of aluminum for
three-month futures contracts on the LME and to the price of
alumina FOB Australia. In 2009, our subsidiary Alunorte
purchased 57.73% of its bauxite requirements from MRN.
Paragominas sells all of its production to our subsidiary
Alunorte, which corresponds to 42.27% of its bauxite
requirements in 2009.
Alumina. Each Alunorte partner must purchase
on a
take-or-pay
basis all alumina produced by Alunorte in proportion to its
respective interest. The partners pay the same price, which is
determined by a formula based on the price of aluminum for
three-month futures contracts on the LME. We usually use a
portion of our share of Alunortes alumina production to
supply Albras, and we sell the remainder to customers in
Argentina, Canada, Egypt, Norway, the United States and other
countries.
Aluminum. Each Albras partner must purchase on
a
take-or-pay
basis all aluminum produced by Albras in proportion to its
ownership interests. We generally market our aluminum in the
global markets, mainly Asia and Europe, to customers in the
aluminum industry. Valesuls aluminum products were sold
primarily in the Brazilian market.
39
2.2.5
Competition
Alumina. The alumina market is competitive,
but small compared to the primary aluminum market, because many
of the major aluminum-producing companies have integrated
bauxite, alumina and aluminum operations. Competition in the
alumina market is based primarily on quality, reliability of
supply and price, which is directly related to lower costs and
logistics. We believe that Alunorte is competitive in the
alumina market because of the high quality of its alumina, its
advantages in scale and technology, lower conversion costs
relative to other refineries on the Atlantic, its efficient port
facilities, and the ongoing commitment of its shareholders to
purchase a substantial portion of its annual production to place
it both in Brazilian and other markets.
Aluminum. The global aluminum market is highly
competitive. The worlds largest producers are subsidiaries
and affiliates of Alcoa, Rusal, Rio Tinto, Chalco, Norsk Hydro
and BHP Billiton. As primary aluminum is a commodity,
competition in the aluminum market is based primarily on the
economics of transportation and the costs of production. We
believe that Albras is competitive in the global aluminum market
because of its relatively efficient and accessible port
facilities and alumina supply.
2.3
Copper
2.3.1
Operations
We conduct our copper operations at the parent-company level in
Brazil and through our subsidiary Vale Inco in Canada.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our share of capital
|
Company
|
|
Location
|
|
Voting
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
Vale
|
|
Brazil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vale Inco
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Brazilian
operations
Our Sossego copper mine in Carajás, in the state of
Pará, has two main copper ore bodies, Sossego and
Sequeirinho. The copper ore is mined by open-pit method, and the
run-of-mine
is processed by means of standard primary crushing and
conveying, SAG milling (a semi-autogenous mill that uses a large
rotating drum filled with ore, water and steel grinding balls to
transform the ore into a fine slurry), ball milling, copper
concentrate flotation, tailings disposal, concentrate
thickening, filtration and load out. We truck the concentrate to
a storage terminal in Parauapebas and then transport it via the
EFC railroad to the Ponta da Madeira maritime terminal in
São Luís, in the state of Maranhão.
We constructed an
85-kilometer
road to link Sossego to the Carajás air and rail facilities
and a power line that allows us to purchase electrical power at
market prices. We have a long-term energy supply contract with
Eletronorte.
In December 2008, we concluded the construction of the Usina
Hidrometalúrgica de Carajás plant (UHC),
located at the Sossego mining site, to test the application of
hydro-metallurgical technology for the industrial-scale
processing of copper concentrate to produce copper cathode. In
2009, we produced 2,178 metric tons of copper cathode in this
plant using copper concentrate from our Sossego mine. The
testing program will continue until the end of 2010 and the
information gathered will be used to design and evaluate the
feasibility of a larger hydro-metallurgical plant. If proven to
be efficient, we believe this technology could be used to
process the sulfide ore produced at the mines in the
Carajás mineral province at a relatively low cost.
Canadian
operations
In Canada, we recover copper in conjunction with our nickel
operations, principally at Sudbury and Voisey Bay. At Sudbury,
we produce two intermediate copper products, copper concentrate
and copper anodes,
40
and we also produce electrowon copper cathode as a by-product of
our nickel refining operations. At Voisey Bay, we produce copper
concentrates. For information about strikes affecting some of
our Canadian nickel operations, see Management and
employeesEmployees.
2.3.2
Production
The following table sets forth information on our copper
production.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production for the year ended December 31,
|
|
Mine
|
|
Type
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(thousand metric tons)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brazil:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sossego
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
Canada:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sudbury
|
|
Underground
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
Voisey Bay
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
Thompson
|
|
Underground
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
External(1)
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
|
312
|
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
We process copper at our facilities
using feed purchased from unrelated parties.
|
2.3.3 Customers
and sales
Copper concentrates from Sossego are sold under medium- and
long-term contracts to copper smelters in South America, Europe
and Asia. We have long-term off-take agreements to sell the
entire production of copper concentrate from the first phase of
the Salobo project to smelters. Electrowon copper from UHC is
mainly sold in Brazil under short-term sales agreements. We have
long-term copper supply agreements with Xstrata Copper Canada
for the sale of copper anodes and copper concentrates produced
in Sudbury. Copper in concentrates from Voisey Bay are sold
under medium-term contracts to customers in Europe. Electrowon
copper from Sudbury is sold in North America under short-term
sales agreements.
2.3.4 Competition
The global copper cathode market is highly competitive.
Producers are integrated mining companies and custom smelters,
covering all regions of the world, while consumers are
principally wire, rod and copper-alloy producers. Competition
occurs mainly on a regional level and is based primarily on
production costs, quality, reliability of supply and logistics
costs. The worlds largest copper cathode producers are
Codelco, Freeport-McMoRan, Aurubis, Jiangxi and Xstrata,
operating at the parent-company level or through subsidiaries.
Our participation in the global copper cathode market is
marginal.
Copper concentrate and copper anode are intermediate products in
the copper production chain. Both the concentrate and anode
markets are competitive, having numerous producers but fewer
participants and smaller volumes than in the copper cathode
market due to high levels of integration by the major copper
producers.
In the copper concentrate market, the main producers are mining
companies located in South America, Indonesia and Australia,
while consumers are custom smelters located in Europe and Asia.
Competition in the copper concentrate market occurs mainly on a
global level and is based on production costs, quality,
logistics costs and reliability of supply. The largest
competitors in the copper concentrate market are
Freeport-McMoRan, BHP Billiton, Xstrata and Rio Tinto, operating
at the parent-company level or through subsidiaries. Our market
share in 2009 was about 3% of the total custom copper
concentrate market.
The copper anode/blister market has very limited trade within
the copper industry; generally, anodes are produced to supply
each companys integrated refinery. The trade in
anodes/blister is limited to those
41
facilities that have more smelting capacity than refining
capacity or to those situations where logistics cost savings
provide an incentive to source anodes from outside smelters. The
largest competitors in the copper anode market are Anglo
American, Xstrata and Codelco, operating at the parent-company
level or through subsidiaries.
2.4 Fertilizer
nutrients
2.4.1 Potash
We conduct potash operations in Brazil at the parent-company
level. We lease Taquari-Vassouras, the only potash mine in
Brazil (in Rosario do Catete, in the state of Sergipe), from
PetrobrasPetróleo Brasileiro S.A., the Brazilian
state-owned oil company. The lease, signed in 1991, became
effective in 1992 for a period of 25 years.
The following table sets forth information on our potash
production.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production for the year ended December 31,
|
|
|
Mine
|
|
Type
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
Recovery rate
|
|
|
|
|
(thousand metric tons)
|
|
(%)
|
|
Taquari-Vassouras
|
|
Underground
|
|
|
671
|
|
|
|
607
|
|
|
|
717
|
|
|
|
87.6
|
|
2.4.2 Phosphates
We have agreed to acquire a 78.9% stake (direct and indirect) in
Fosfertil and 100% of BPI. See Significant changes in
our business. Fosfertil is a Brazilian producer of phosphate
rock, phosphates fertilizers (P) (e.g., monoammonium
phosphate (MAP), diammonium phosphate (DAP), triple
superphosphate (TSP) and single superphosphate (SSP)) and
nitrogen (N) fertilizers (e.g., ammonium nitrate and
urea). It is the largest producer of P and N crop nutrients in
Brazil. Fosfertil operates three phosphate rock mines:
Catalão, in the state of Goiás, Tapira and Patos de
Minas, both in the state of Minas Gerais. In addition, it is
developing Salitre, a greenfield project in Patrocínio, in
the state of Minas Gerais. BPI owns two phosphate rock mines,
Araxá, in the state of Minas Gerais, and Cajati, in the
state of São Paulo. BPI also has four processing plants for
the production of phosphates fertilizers, located at Araxá,
Minas Gerais; Cajati, São Paulo; Cubatão, São
Paulo; and Guará, São Paulo.
2.4.3 Customers
and sales
All potash sales from the Taquari-Vassouras mine are to the
Brazilian market. Our production represents 8-10% of total
potash consumption in Brazil. We have a strong presence and
long-standing relationships with the major players in Brazil.
2.4.4 Competition
Fertilizers have a strong demand growth potential, which is
anchored in market fundamentals similar to those underlying the
global demand for minerals, metals and energy. Rapid per capita
income growth of emerging economies causes diet changes towards
an increasing intake of proteins that ultimately contribute to
boost fertilizer use. More recently, global output of biofuels
has started to boom as they emerged as an alternative source of
energy to reduce world reliance on sources of climate-changing
greenhouse gases. Given that key inputs for the production of
biofuels sugar cane, corn and palm
are intensive in the use of fertilizers, they are becoming
another major driver of the global demand for crop nutrients.
The industry is divided into three major nutrients: potash,
phosphate and nitrogen. There are limited resources of potash
around the world with Canada, Russia and Belarus being the most
important sources. Due to the lack of resources, the high level
of investment and the long time for a project to mature, it is
unlikely that other regions will emerge as major potash
producers. While potash is a very scarce resource, phosphate is
42
more available, but all major exporters are located in the
northern region of Africa (Morocco, Algeria and Tunisia) and in
the United States.
Brazil is one of the largest agribusiness markets in the world
due to its high production and consumption of grains and
biofuel. It is the fifth-largest consumer of fertilizers in the
world and one of the largest importers of phosphates, potash,
urea and phosphoric acid. Brazil imports 90% of its potash (6.8
Mt) from Canadian, Russian and German producers in descending
order. The United States, Brazil, China and India are important
consumers of potash, representing 60% of total global
consumption. Our projects portfolios are highly competitive in
terms of cost and logistics with these regions. The potash
industry is highly concentrated, with the eight major producers
being responsible for more than 80% of total world production
capacity.
We are building our expertise in solution mine technology for
potash mining. During the last period, we achieved very good
results applying this technology for silvinite and carnalite
resources in the Rio Colorado and Carnalita projects,
respectively. We believe that this technology will enhance our
competitive advantage in operating and capital expenditures.
Most phosphate concentrate is consumed locally by downstream
integrated producers, with the seaborne market corresponding to
15% of total phosphate rock production. Major phosphate rock
exporters are concentrated in North Africa, mainly through
state-owned companies, with OCP Group holding 49% of the total
seaborne market. Brazil imports 49% of its total phosphate
nutrients it needs in both phosphate fertilizer products and
phosphate rock. The phosphate rock imports supply non-integrated
producers of phosphate fertilizers products such as single
superphosphate (SSP), triple superphosphate (TSP) and
monoammonium phosphate (MAP).
2.5 PGMs
and other precious metals
As by-products of our Sudbury nickel operations in Canada, we
recover significant quantities of PGMs, as well as small
quantities of gold and silver. We operate a processing facility
in Port Colborne, Ontario, which produces PGMs, gold and silver
intermediate products. We have a refinery in Acton, England,
where we process our intermediate products, as well as feeds
purchased from unrelated parties and toll-refined materials. In
2009, PGM concentrates from our Sudbury operations supplied
about 36% of our PGM production. Our global nickel marketing
department sells our own PGMs and other precious metals, as well
as products from unrelated parties and toll-refined products, on
a sales agency basis. For information about strikes affecting
some of our Canadian operations, see Management and
employeesEmployees.
The following table sets forth information on our precious
metals production.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mine(1)
|
|
Type
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
(thousand troy ounces)
|
|
|
Sudbury:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Platinum
|
|
Underground
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
Palladium
|
|
Underground
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
Gold
|
|
Underground
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Production figures exclude precious
metals purchased from unrelated parties and toll-refined
materials.
|
2.6 Other
non-ferrous minerals
2.6.1 Cobalt
We recover significant quantities of cobalt as a by-product of
our Canadian nickel operations. In 2009, we produced 639 metric
tons of refined cobalt metal at our Port Colborne refinery and
554 metric tons of cobalt in a cobalt-based intermediate at our
Thompson nickel operations in Canada. Our remaining cobalt
production consisted of 491 metric tons of cobalt contained in
other intermediate products (such as nickel
43
concentrates). For information about strikes affecting some of
our Canadian operations, see Management and
employeesEmployees. We expect to increase our
production of cobalt as we increase nickel production in New
Caledonia at the Goro mine, because the nickel laterite ore at
this location contains significant co-deposits of cobalt.
We sell cobalt on a global basis. Our cobalt metal, which is
electro-refined at our Port Colborne refinery, has very high
purity levels (99.8%). Cobalt metal is used in the production of
various alloys, particularly for aerospace applications, as well
as the manufacture of cobalt-based chemicals.
The following table sets forth information on our cobalt
production.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production for the year ended December 31,
|
|
Mine
|
|
Type
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(metric tons)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sudbury
|
|
Underground
|
|
|
727
|
|
|
|
804
|
|
|
|
359
|
|
Thompson
|
|
Underground
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
Voisey Bay
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
1,239
|
|
|
|
1,695
|
|
|
|
971
|
|
External(1)
|
|
|
|
|
379
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2,524
|
|
|
|
2,828
|
|
|
|
1,575
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
These figures do not include
unrelated-party tolling of feeds purchased from unrelated
parties.
|
2.6.2 Kaolin
We conduct our kaolin business in Brazil, through the
subsidiaries set forth in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our share of capital
|
|
|
Company
|
|
Location
|
|
Voting
|
|
Total
|
|
Partners
|
|
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
|
CADAM
|
|
Vitória do Jari, Amapá
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
61.5
|
|
|
Banco do Brasil and BNDES
|
PPSA
|
|
Barcarena, Pará
|
|
|
85.6
|
|
|
|
86.2
|
|
|
Mitsubishi Corporation
|
CADAM S.A. (CADAM) and Pará Pigmentos S.A.
(PPSA) produce kaolin for paper coating. They also
conduct research into other uses for kaolin products in order to
develop a more diversified portfolio.
CADAM is located on the border of the states of Pará and
Amapá, in the Amazon area in northern Brazil. CADAMs
reserves are principally concentrated in the open-pit Morro do
Felipe mine, in Vitória do Jari, in the state of
Amapá. The beneficiation plant and private port facilities
are situated on the west bank of the Jari River, in Munguba, in
the state of Pará. CADAM produces the following products:
Amazon SB, Amazon Premium and Amazon Plus. They are sold mainly
in the European, Asian and Latin American markets.
PPSA operates an open-pit mine, Rio Capim, and a beneficiation
plant. These operations are linked to the land and port
facilities in Barcarena, via a
180-kilometer
pipeline. The beneficiated kaolin is pumped through a slurry
pipeline. PPSA produces the following products: Century, Century
S, Paraprint, Paraplate and Paralux. They are sold mainly in the
European, Asian and North American markets. We are in
preliminary negotiations to sell PPSA.
CADAM obtains electricity from its own thermal power plant,
whose nominal capacity is 25.0 MW. PPSA has an energy
supply contract with Rede Celpa, a power generation company in
the state of Pará, Brazil.
44
The following table sets forth information on our kaolin
production.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production for the year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recovery
|
|
Mine
|
|
Type
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
rate(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(thousand metric tons)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
CADAM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Morro do Felipe
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
714
|
|
|
|
602
|
|
|
|
427
|
|
|
|
52.1
|
|
PPSA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rio Capim
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
639
|
|
|
|
528
|
|
|
|
354
|
|
|
|
24.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,354
|
|
|
|
1,129
|
|
|
|
781
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 Operations
We produce thermal and metallurgical coal through our subsidiary
Vale Australia, which operates coal assets in Australia through
wholly owned companies and unincorporated joint ventures, and
thermal coal through our subsidiary Vale Colombia.
We also have a minority interest in two Chinese companies, Henan
Longyu Energy Resources Co., Ltd. (Longyu) and
Shandong Yankuang International Coking Company Ltd.
(Yankuang), as set forth in the following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our share
|
|
|
|
Company
|
|
Business
|
|
Location
|
|
of capital
|
|
|
Partners
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
|
|
Vale Australia
|
|
|
|
Australia:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Integra Coal
|
|
Thermal and metallurgical coal
|
|
Hunter Valley, New South
Wales
|
|
|
61.2
|
|
|
NSC, JFE, Posco, Toyota
|
Carborough Downs
|
|
Metallurgical coal
|
|
Bowen Basin, Queensland
|
|
|
80.0
|
|
|
NSC, JFE, Posco, Tata
|
Isaac Plains
|
|
Thermal and metallurgical coal
|
|
Bowen Basin, Queensland
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
|
Aquila
|
Broadlea
|
|
Thermal and metallurgical coal
|
|
Bowen Basin, Queensland
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vale Colombia
|
|
Thermal coal
|
|
Colombia
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Longyu
|
|
Coal and other related products
|
|
Henan Province, China
|
|
|
25.0
|
|
|
Yongmei Group Co., Ltd. (former
Yongcheng Coal & Electricity (Group) Co.
Ltd.), Shanghai Baosteel International
Economic & Trading Co., Ltd. and other
minority shareholders
|
Yankuang
|
|
Metallurgical coke and methanol
|
|
Shandong Province, China
|
|
|
25.0
|
|
|
Yankuang Group Co. Limited, Itochu
Corporation
|
Integra Coal Operations (underground and
open-cut). The Integra Coal Operations are
located 10 kilometers north-west of Singleton in the Hunter
Valley of New South Wales, Australia. The operations comprise an
underground coal mine that produces coal by longwall methods,
and an open-cut pit. Coal from the mine is processed at a coal
handling and processing plant (CHPP) with a capacity
of 1,200 metric tons per hour, loaded onto trains at a
purpose-built rail loadout facility for transport to the port of
Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
Carborough Downs. Carborough Downs is located
in the Central Bowen Basin in central Queensland, Australia, 15
kilometers east of the township of Moranbah and 180 kilometers
southwest of the coastal city of Mackay. Carborough Downs mining
leases overlie the Rangal Coal Measures of the Bowen Basin with
the
45
economic seams of Leichardt and Vermont. Both seams have coking
properties and can be beneficiated to produce coking and PCI
products. The Leichardt seam is currently our main target for
development and constitutes 100% of the current reserve and
resource base. Carborough Downs coal is processed at the
Carborough Downs CHPP, which is capable of processing 1000
metric tons per hour, and which operates seven days per week.
The product is loaded onto trains at a rail loadout facility and
transported 160 kilometers to the Dalrymple Bay Coal Terminal,
Queensland, Australia.
Isaac Plains. The Isaac Plains open-cut mine
is located close to Carborough Downs in central Queensland. The
mine is managed by Isaac Plains Coal Management on behalf of the
joint venture parties. The coal is classified as a medium
volatile bituminous coal with low ash and sulfur contents. Isaac
Plainss product split for the life of the mine is 75%
metallurgical coal and 25% thermal coal. Coal is processed at
the Isaac Plains CHPP and railed 172 kilometers to the Dalrymple
Bay Coal Terminal.
Broadlea. Broadlea is an open-cut operation
located just north of Carborough Downs underground mine,
consisting of a collection of small economic coal deposits.
Broadlea is mined using the
truck-and-shovel
method, and product coal is toll-washed at the Carborough Downs
CHPP and railed 172 kilometers to the Dalrymple Bay Coal
Terminal in Queensland, Australia. At the end of 2009, Broadlea
ceased operations and underwent maintenance due to increasing
unit costs. The mines economic viability will undergo
regular review to determine the potential recommencement of
operations.
El Hatillo. The El Hatillo thermal coal mine
is located in the central portion of the Cesar Department, 210
kilometers southeast of Santa Marta. The concession area is
adjacent to the town of La Loma and encompasses an area of
9,693 hectares.
3.2
Production
The following table sets forth information on our coal
production.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production for the year ended December 31,
|
Operation
|
|
Mine type
|
|
2007(1)
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(thousand metric tons)
|
|
|
|
Thermal coal:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
El Hatillo(2)
|
|
Open-cut
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,143
|
Integra Coal(3)
|
|
Open-cut
|
|
255
|
|
557
|
|
702
|
Isaac Plains(4)
|
|
Open-cut
|
|
171
|
|
147
|
|
551
|
Broadlea
|
|
Open-cut
|
|
14
|
|
582
|
|
497
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total thermal coal
|
|
440
|
|
1,286
|
|
2,892
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Metallurgical coal:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Integra Coal(3)
|
|
Underground and open-cut
|
|
1,214
|
|
1,747
|
|
1,184
|
Isaac Plains(4)
|
|
Open-cut
|
|
249
|
|
382
|
|
487
|
Carborough Downs(5)
|
|
Underground
|
|
269
|
|
429
|
|
604
|
Broadlea
|
|
Open-cut
|
|
32
|
|
249
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total metallurgical coal
|
|
1,764
|
|
2,808
|
|
2,527
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
We acquired AMCI HA, the previous
owner of these mines, in April 2007. Figures for 2007 include
production from May to December 2007 only.
|
(2)
|
|
We acquired El Hatillo in the first
quarter of 2009. Figures for 2009 include production from April
to December only.
|
(3)
|
|
These figures correspond to our
61.2% equity interest in Integra Coal, an unincorporated joint
venture.
|
(4)
|
|
These figures correspond to our 50%
equity interest in Isaac Plains, an unincorporated joint venture.
|
(5)
|
|
These figures correspond to our 80%
equity interest in Carborough Downs, an unincorporated joint
venture.
|
46
|
|
|
Operation
|
|
Mine type
|
|
El Hatillo(1)
|
|
Open-cut
|
Integra Coal(2)
|
|
Underground and open-cut
|
Isaac Plains(3)
|
|
Open-cut
|
Carborough Downs(4)
|
|
Underground
|
Broadlea
|
|
Open-cut
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
We acquired El Hatillo in the first
quarter of 2009. Figures for 2009 include production from April
to December only.
|
(2)
|
|
These figures correspond to our
61.2% equity interest in Integra Coal, an unincorporated joint
venture.
|
(3)
|
|
These figures correspond to our 50%
equity interest in Isaac Plains, an unincorporated joint venture.
|
(4)
|
|
These figures correspond to our 80%
equity interest in Carborough Downs, an unincorporated joint
venture.
|
Longyu produces coal and other related products. Yankuang, a
metallurgical coke plant, has production capacity of
2.0 million metric tons per year of coke and 200,000 metric
tons per year of methanol.
3.3
Customers and sales
The coal sales from our Australian operations are primarily
focused on East Asia. In 2009, 41% of our coal sales were made
to Japanese steel mills and power utilities. In 2009, our
Chinese coal joint ventures directed their sales mainly to the
Chinese domestic market. The coal sales from our Colombian
operations are primarily focused in Europe and the United States.
Integras operations in New South Wales are similar to many
Hunter Valley operations in that the vast majority of production
is consumed in northern Asia. Our Queensland operations
commenced production in late 2006. Aided by a strong market for
metallurgical coal, we were able to market various types of coal
from Carborough Downs, Broadlea and Isaac Plains mines in a
number of target markets, predominantly those mentioned above.
3.4
Competition
The global coal industry, which is primarily comprised of the
markets for hard coal (metallurgical coal and thermal coal) and
brown coal/lignite, is highly competitive. Growth in steel
demand, especially in Asia, underpins strong demand for
metallurgical coal. Major port and rail constraints in some of
the countries in which major suppliers are located could lead to
limited availability of incremental metallurgical coal
production.
The global seaborne thermal coal market has significantly
expanded in recent years. Growth in thermal coal demand is
closely related to growth in electricity consumption, which will
continue to be driven by global economic growth, particularly
from emerging economies. Large existing fleets of coal-fired
power plants with long life cycles take decades to replace or
upgrade, keeping a high share of thermal coal in the electricity
matrix in countries with high consumption. The cost of fuel is
typically the largest variable cost involved in electricity
generation and coal is currently the most competitively priced
fossil fuel for this purpose.
Competition in the coal industry is based primarily on the
economics of production costs, coal quality and transportation
costs. We believe that our operations and project pipeline are
competitive, and our key competitive strengths include the
strategic geographic location of our current and future supply
bases and our production cash costs relative to several other
coal producers.
Major participants in the coal seaborne market are subsidiaries
and affiliates of Xstrata plc, BHP Billiton plc, PT Bumi
Resources Tbk., Anglo Coal, Drummond Company, Inc., Rio Tinto
Ltd., Teck Cominco, Peabody and the Shenhua Group.
47
4.1 Logistics
services
We have developed our logistics business based on the
transportation needs of our mining operations, mainly iron ore,
and it also provides transportation services for customers
products and for passengers. We conduct logistics businesses at
the parent-company level, through subsidiaries and through joint
ventures, as set forth in the following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our share of capital
|
|
|
Company
|
|
Business
|
|
Location
|
|
Voting
|
|
Total
|
|
Partners
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
|
Vale
|
|
Railroad (EFVM and EFC), port and maritime terminal operations
|
|
Brazil
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
FCA
|
|
Railroad operations
|
|
Brazil
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
99.9
|
|
|
Former employees of Rede
Ferroviária Federal S.A.
|
FNS
|
|
Railroad operations
|
|
Brazil
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
MRS
|
|
Railroad operations
|
|
Brazil
|
|
|
37.9
|
|
|
|
41.5
|
|
|
CSN, Usiminas and Gerdau
|
CPBS
|
|
Port and maritime
terminal operations
|
|
Brazil
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
Log-In
|
|
Port and maritime
terminal operations and shipping activities
|
|
Brazil
|
|
|
31.3
|
|
|
|
31.3
|
|
|
Mitsui &Co., public
investors
|
PTI
|
|
Port and maritime
terminal operations
|
|
Indonesia
|
|
|
59.1
|
|
|
|
59.1
|
|
|
Sumitomo, public investors
|
SPRC
|
|
Port and maritime
terminal operations
|
|
Colombia
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
FENOCO
|
|
Railroad operations
|
|
Colombia
|
|
|
8.4
|
|
|
|
8.4
|
|
|
Drummond, Glencore and
Coalcorp
|
4.1.1
Railroads
Brazil
Vitória a Minas railroad
(EFVM). The EFVM railroad
links our Southeastern System mines in the Iron Quadrangle
region in the Brazilian state of Minas Gerais to the
Tubarão Port, in Vitória, in the Brazilian state of
Espírito Santo. We operate this
905-kilometer
railroad under a
30-year
renewable concession, which expires in 2027. The EFVM railroad
consists of two lines of track extending for a distance of 601
kilometers to permit continuous railroad travel in opposite
directions, and single-track branches of 304 kilometers.
Industrial manufacturers are located in this area and major
agricultural regions are also accessible to it. The EFVM
railroad has a daily capacity of 342,000 metric tons of iron
ore. In 2009, the EFVM railroad carried a total of
60.5 billion ntk of iron ore and other cargo, of which
13.5 billion ntk, or 22%, consisted of cargo transported
for customers, including iron ore for Brazilian customers. The
EFVM railroad also carried 0.9 million passengers in 2009.
In 2009, we had a fleet of 331 locomotives and 19,395 wagons at
EFVM.
Carajás railroad
(EFC). We operate the EFC
railroad under a
30-year
renewable concession, which expires in 2027. EFC is located in
the Northern System, beginning at our Carajás iron ore
mines in the Brazilian state of Pará and extending 892
kilometers to our Ponta da Madeira maritime terminal complex
facilities located near the Itaqui Port in the Brazilian state
of Maranhão. Its main cargo is iron ore, principally
carried for us. It has a daily capacity of 301,000 metric tons
of iron ore. In 2009, the EFC railroad carried a total of
85.04 billion ntk of iron ore and other cargo,
3.11 billion ntk of which was cargo for customers,
including iron ore for Brazilian customers. EFC also carried
342,665 passengers in 2009. EFC supports the largest capacity
train in Latin America, which measures 3.4 kilometers, weighs
42,300 gross metric tons when loaded and has 330 cars. In
2009, EFC also had a fleet of 226 locomotives and 12,627 wagons.
48
Ferrovia Centro-Atlântica
(FCA). Our subsidiary FCA
operates the central-east regional railway network of the
Brazilian national railway system under a
30-year
renewable concession, which expires in 2026. The central east
network has 8,023 kilometers of track extending into the states
of Sergipe, Bahia, Espírito Santo, Minas Gerais, Rio de
Janeiro and Goiás and Brasília, the Federal District
of Brazil. It connects with our EFVM railroad near the cities of
Belo Horizonte, in the state of Minas Gerais and Vitória,
in the state of Espírito Santo. FCA operates on the same
track gauge as our EFVM railroad and provides access to the
Santos Port in the state of São Paulo. In 2009, the FCA
railroad transported a total of 10.62 billion ntk of cargo
for customers. In 2009, FCA had a fleet of 498 locomotives and
13,061 wagons.
Ferrovia Norte-Sul railroad
(FNS). In October 2007, we won
the auction for the subconcession for commercial operation for
30 years of a
720-kilometer
stretch of the FNS railroad, in Brazil. Since 1989, we have
operated a segment of the FNS, which connects to the EFC
railroad, enabling access to the port of Itaqui, in São
Luís, where our Ponta da Madeira maritime terminal is
located. A
452-kilometer
extension was concluded in December 2008. In 2009, the FNS
railroad transported a total of 1.16 billion ntk of cargo
for customers. This new railroad creates a new corridor for the
transportation of general cargo, mainly for the export of
soybeans, rice and corn produced in the center-northern region
of Brazil. In 2009, FNS had a fleet of 6 locomotives and 370
wagons.
The principal items of cargo of the EFVM, EFC, FCA and FNS
railroads are:
|
|
|
|
|
iron ore and iron ore pellets, carried for us and customers;
|
|
|
|
steel, coal, pig iron, limestone and other raw materials carried
for customers with steel mills located along the railroad;
|
|
|
|
agricultural products, such as soybeans, soybean meal and
fertilizers; and
|
|
|
|
other general cargo, such as building materials, pulp, fuel and
chemical products.
|
We charge market prices for customer freight, including iron ore
pellets originating from joint ventures and other enterprises in
which we do not have a 100% equity interest. Market prices vary
based on the distance traveled, the type of product transported
and the weight of the freight in question, and are regulated by
the Brazilian transportation regulatory agency, ANTT
(Agência Nacional de Transportes Terrestres).
MRS Logística S.A. (MRS). The
MRS railroad is 1,643 kilometers long and links the Brazilian
states of Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo and Minas Gerais. In
2009, the MRS railroad carried a total of 56.25 million
metric tons of cargo, including 51.1 million metric tons of
iron ore and other cargo from Vale.
Colombia
Ferrocarriles del Norte de Colombia S.A.
(FENOCO). We own an 8.4% equity stake in
FENOCO, a company that owns a concession to restore and operate
the Chiriguana - Santa Marta tranche (220 kilometers) of the
Atlantic Railroad, which connects the Cesar coal-producing
region with various ports in the Atlantic Ocean.
4.1.2 Ports
and maritime terminals
Brazil
We operate a port and six maritime terminals principally as a
means to complete the delivery of our iron ore and iron ore
pellets to bulk carrier vessels serving the seaborne market.
SeeFerrous mineralsIron ore
pelletsOperations. We also use our port and
terminals to handle customers cargo. In 2009, 10% of the
cargo handled by our port and terminals represented cargo
handled for customers.
49
Tubarão Port. The Tubarão Port,
which covers an area of 18 square kilometers, is located
near the Vitória Port in the Brazilian state of
Espírito Santo and contains four maritime terminals:
(i) the iron ore maritime terminal, (ii) Praia Mole
Terminal, (iii) Terminal de Produtos Diversos, and
(iv) Terminal de Granéis Líquidos.
|
|
|
|
|
The iron ore maritime terminal has two piers. Pier I can
accommodate two vessels at a time, one of up to 170,000 DWT on
the southern side and one of up to 200,000 DWT on the northern
side. Pier II can accommodate one vessel of up to 365,000
DWT at a time, limited at 20 meters draft plus tide. In Pier I
there are two ship loaders, which can load up to a combined
total of 14,000 metric tons per hour. In Pier II there are
two ship loaders that work alternately and can each load up to
16,000 metric tons per hour. In 2009, 77.42 million metric
tons of iron ore and iron ore pellets were shipped through the
terminal for us. The iron ore maritime terminal has a stockyard
capacity of 2.8 million metric tons.
|
|
|
|
Praia Mole terminal is principally a coal terminal and handled
8.9 million metric tons in 2009. See Additional
informationLegal proceedings.
|
|
|
|
Terminal de Produtos Diversos handled 5.9 million metric
tons of grains and fertilizers in 2009.
|
|
|
|
Terminal de Granéis Líquidos handled 1 million
metric tons of bulk liquid in 2009.
|
Ponta da Madeira maritime terminal. The Ponta
da Madeira maritime terminal is located near the Itaqui Port in
the Brazilian state of Maranhão. The terminal facilities
can accommodate four vessels. Pier I can accommodate vessels
displacing up to 420,000 DWT. Pier II can accommodate
vessels of up to 155,000 DWT. Pier I has a maximum loading rate
of 16,000 tons per hour. Pier II has a maximum loading rate
of 8,000 tons per hour. Pier III, which has two berths and three
shiploaders, can accommodate vessels of up to 220,000 DWT and
has a maximum loading rate of 8,000 metric tons per hour in each
shiploader. Cargo shipped through our Ponta da Madeira maritime
terminal consists principally of our own iron ore production.
Other cargo includes manganese ore, copper concentrate and pig
iron produced by us and pig iron and soybeans for unrelated
parties. In 2009, 87.3 million metric tons were handled
through the terminal for us and 4.5 million metric tons for
customers. The Ponta da Madeira maritime terminal has a
stockyard capacity of 5.4 million metric tons.
Itaguaí maritime terminal Cia.
Portuária Baía de Sepetiba
(CPBS). CPBS is a wholly owned subsidiary
that operates the Itaguaí terminal, in the Sepetiba Port,
in the Brazilian state of Rio de Janeiro. Itaguaís
maritime terminal has a pier that allows the loading of ships up
to 18 meters of draft and up to 230,000 DWT. In 2009, the
terminal uploaded 19.6 million metric tons of iron ore.
From December 2007 to February 2008, Itaguaí operated with
limited capacity as a result of an accident with a ship in the
terminal.
Guaíba Island maritime terminal. We
operate a maritime terminal on Guaíba Island in the
Sepetiba Bay, in the Brazilian state of Rio de Janeiro. The iron
ore terminal has a pier that allows the loading of ships of up
to 300,000 DWT. In 2009, the terminal uploaded 36.8 million
metric tons of iron ore.
Inácio Barbosa maritime terminal
(TMIB). We operate the
Inácio Barbosa maritime terminal, located in the Brazilian
state of Sergipe. The terminal is owned by Petrobras. Vale and
Petrobras entered into an agreement in December 2002, which
allows Vale to operate this terminal for a period of
10 years. In 2009, 0.9 million metric tons of fuel and
agricultural and steel products were shipped through TMIB.
Colombia
Sociedad Portuaria Rio Cordoba
(SPRC). SPRC is a seaport facility
wholly owned by Vale and used to export coal from the El Hatillo
operation, as well as other nearby mines. The port is located in
Cienaga, on the Caribbean coast of Colombia, in the Magdalena
Department, about 67 kilometers from Barranquilla and 31
kilometers from Santa Marta.
50
Indonesia
PTI owns and operates two ports in Indonesia to support its
nickel mining activities.
|
|
|
|
|
The Balantang Special Port is located in Balantang Village,
South Sulawesi, and has a pier that can accommodate vessels
displacing up to 6,000 DWT.
|
|
|
|
The Harapan Tanjung Mangkasa Village is located in Harapan
Tanjung Mangkasa Village, South Sulawesi, and has a pier that
can accommodate vessels displacing up to 39,000 DWT.
|
4.1.3 Shipping
We operate in two distinct shipping areas: seaborne dry bulk
shipping and tug boat services. The following table sets forth
information on the volume of cargo that our seaborne dry bulk
shipping service carried for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(thousand metric tons)
|
|
|
Iron ore:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vale
|
|
|
1,324
|
|
|
|
1,884
|
|
|
|
2,739
|
|
Customers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coal
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,471
|
|
|
|
1,884
|
|
|
|
2,739
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We are developing a low-cost freight portfolio. Since 2007, we
have operated three capesize vessels, which have been fully
dedicated to performing shuttle services from Brazil to Asia. In
2009, we bought 17 used capesize vessels, seven of which begin
operation in 2010. We have also entered into long-term freight
contracts and have placed orders with shipyards for the
construction of 16 very large ore carriers, each with a capacity
of 400,000 DWT, and four additional capesize vessels, each with
a capacity of 180,000 DWT. We expect this service to enhance our
ability to offer our products in the Asian market at competitive
prices and to increase our market share in China and the global
seaborne market.
We have also entered into long-term freight contracts to
transport pellet feed from Brazil to Oman, where we are building
a pellet plant with nominal capacity of 9 million metric
tons of direct reduction iron ore pellets per year and a
distribution center with capacity to handle 40 million tons
of iron ore or iron ore pellets.
We own 31.3% of Log-In, which conducts intermodal shipping
business. Log-In offers port handling and container
transportation services, by sea or rail, as well as container
storage. It operates owned and chartered ships for coastal
shipping, a container terminal (Terminal Vila Velha, or
TVV) and two multimodal terminals. In 2009, Log-Ins
coastal shipping service transported 110,547 twenty-foot
equivalent units (teus), TVV handled 211,387 teus and its
express train service moved 41,475 teus.
We also operate a fleet of 25 tug boats (14 owned and 11
chartered) in maritime terminals in Brazil, in Vitória
(state of Espírito Santo), Trombetas (state of Pará),
São Luís (state of Maranhão) and Aracaju (state
of Sergipe).
51
4.2
Energy
4.2.1 Electric
power
We have developed our energy assets based on the current and
projected energy needs of our mining operations, with the goal
of reducing our energy costs and minimizing the risk of energy
shortages.
Brazil
Energy management and efficient supply in Brazil are priorities
for us, given the uncertainties associated with changes in the
regulatory environment, and the risk of rising electricity
prices and electric energy shortages (as experienced in Brazil
in the second half of 2001). We currently have seven
hydroelectric power plants in operation. In 2009, our total
energy capacity in Brazil was 12,509 GWh. We use the electricity
produced by these plants for our internal consumption needs. As
a large consumer of electricity, we expect that investing in
power projects will help us reduce costs and will protect us
against energy price volatility. However, we may experience
delays in the construction of certain generation projects due to
environmental and regulatory issues, which may lead to higher
costs.
Canada
In 2009, our wholly owned and operated hydroelectric power
plants in Sudbury generated 31% of the electricity requirements
of our Sudbury operations. The power plants consist of five
separate generation stations with an installed generator
nameplate capacity of 56 MW. The output of the plants is
limited by water availability, as well as constraints imposed by
a water management plan regulated by the provincial government.
Over the course of 2009, the power system operator distributed
electrical energy at the rate of 80.0 MW to all surface
plants and mines in the Sudbury area.
In 2009, diesel generation provided 100% of the electric
requirements of our Voisey Bay operations. We have six diesel
generators
on-site, of
which normally only four are in operation, producing 12 MW.
Indonesia
Energy costs are a significant component of our nickel
production costs for the processing of lateritic ores at PTI
operations in Indonesia. A major portion of PTIs electric
furnace power requirements are supplied at low-cost by its two
hydroelectric power plants on the Larona River: (i) the
Larona plant, which generates an average of 180 MW, and
(ii) the Balambano plant, which generates an average of
110 MW. PTI has thermal generating facilities which include
24 Caterpillar diesel generators, with capacity of 1 MW
each, five Mirrlees Blackstone diesel generators, and one oil
burning steam turbine generator. These generators have the
capacity to provide 80 MW of power.
4.2.2 Oil
and natural gas
The use of natural gas in our energy matrix in Brazil is
expected to increase from 1.3 million cubic meters per day
(Mm3/day) in 2009 to 12.8 Mm3/day in 2020. In
order to mitigate supply and price risks we started investing in
natural gas exploration. Since 2007, we have developed a
29-block portfolio in Brazilian onshore and offshore basins.
During 2009, the operators of the consortia in which we
participate drilled six offshore wells in the Santos and
Espírito Santo basins. These wells delivered two oil and
gas discoveries that are going to be delimited and tested in the
current year. Both of them are located in the Santos basin, on
the BM-S-48 concession area. Oil or gas existence has been
detected at three other wells but common technical or commercial
issues prevented their development.
52
We own a 50% stake in California Steel Industries, Inc.
(CSI), a producer of flat-rolled steel and pipe
products located in the United States. The remainder is owned by
JFE Steel. CSI has annual production capacity of
1.8 million metric tons of flat rolled steel and pipe. CSI
is adding a second reheat furnace with
state-of-the-art
environmental technology which will increase its capacity by
about 50%. The total cost of the project is estimated to be
US$71.0 million.
RESERVES
Presentation
of information concerning reserves
The estimates of proven and probable ore reserves at our mines
and projects and the estimates of mine life included in this
annual report have been prepared by our staff of experienced
geologists and engineers, unless otherwise stated, and
calculated in accordance with the technical definitions
established by the SEC. Under the SECs Industry Guide 7:
|
|
|
|
|
Reserves are the part of a mineral deposit that could be
economically and legally extracted or produced at the time of
the reserve determination.
|
|
|
|
Proven (measured) reserves are reserves for which
(a) quantity is computed from dimensions revealed in
outcrops, trenches, working or drill holes; grade
and/or
quality are computed from the results of detailed sampling; and
(b) the sites for inspection, sampling and measurement are
spaced so closely and the geologic character is so well defined
that size, shape, depth and mineral content of reserves are
well-established.
|
|
|
|
Probable (indicated) reserves are reserves for which quantity
and grade
and/or
quality are computed from information similar to that used for
proven (measured) reserves, but the sites for inspection,
sampling and measurement are farther apart or are otherwise less
adequately spaced. The degree of assurance, although lower than
that for proven (measured) reserves, is high enough to assume
continuity between points of observation.
|
We periodically revise our reserve estimates when we have new
geological data, economic assumptions or mining plans. During
2009, we performed an analysis of our reserve estimates for
certain projects, which is reflected in new estimates as of
December 31, 2009. Reserve estimates for each operation are
for 100% of the operation and assume that we either have or will
obtain all of the necessary rights to mine, extract and process
ore reserves at each mine. Where we own less than 100% of the
operation, reserve estimates have not been adjusted to reflect
our ownership interest. Certain figures in the tables,
discussions and notes have been rounded. For a description of
risks relating to reserves and reserve estimates, see Risk
factors.
Iron ore
reserves
In preparing iron ore reserve data, we used price assumptions
that did not exceed the three-year (2007 to
2009) historical average prices for iron ore of US$0.9217
per Fe unit for Southeastern System fines and US$0.9518 per Fe
unit for Carajás fines.
53
The following tables set forth our iron ore reserves and other
information about our iron ore mines. Our iron ore reserve
estimates are of in-place material after adjustments for mining
depletion, with no adjustments made for metal losses due to
processing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary of total iron ore reserves(1)
|
|
|
|
Proven 2009
|
|
|
Probable 2009
|
|
|
Total 2009
|
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Southeastern System
|
|
|
2,196.3
|
|
|
|
51.0
|
|
|
|
1,239.2
|
|
|
|
50.3
|
|
|
|
3,435.4
|
|
|
|
50.7
|
|
Southern System
|
|
|
1,508.2
|
|
|
|
52.4
|
|
|
|
1,864.8
|
|
|
|
49.0
|
|
|
|
3,373.0
|
|
|
|
50.5
|
|
Northern System
|
|
|
5,038.5
|
|
|
|
66.7
|
|
|
|
2,060.0
|
|
|
|
66.6
|
|
|
|
7,098.5
|
|
|
|
66.7
|
|
Samarco(2)
|
|
|
1,172.1
|
|
|
|
42.5
|
|
|
|
939.1
|
|
|
|
39.8
|
|
|
|
2,111.2
|
|
|
|
41.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
9,915.1
|
|
|
|
58.2
|
|
|
|
6,103.1
|
|
|
|
53.8
|
|
|
|
16,018.2
|
|
|
|
56.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Tonnage is stated in millions of
metric tons of wet
run-of-mine.
Grade is % of Fe.
|
(2)
|
|
Reserves of Samarcos Alegria
iron ore mines. Samarco is 50% owned by Vale.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iron ore reserves per mine in the Southeastern System(1)
|
|
|
|
Proven 2009
|
|
|
Probable 2009
|
|
|
Total 2009
|
|
|
Total 2008
|
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Itabira complex
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conceição
|
|
|
292.8
|
|
|
|
51.4
|
|
|
|
27.2
|
|
|
|
58.8
|
|
|
|
320.0
|
|
|
|
52.0
|
|
|
|
349.1
|
|
|
|
52.0
|
|
Minas do Meio
|
|
|
326.5
|
|
|
|
53.9
|
|
|
|
175.1
|
|
|
|
56.1
|
|
|
|
501.6
|
|
|
|
54.6
|
|
|
|
521.7
|
|
|
|
54.5
|
|
Minas Centrais complex
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Água Limpa(2)
|
|
|
44.8
|
|
|
|
41.8
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
42.2
|
|
|
|
50.8
|
|
|
|
41.8
|
|
|
|
52.8
|
|
|
|
41.8
|
|
Gongo Soco
|
|
|
50.9
|
|
|
|
64.7
|
|
|
|
20.2
|
|
|
|
58.6
|
|
|
|
71.1
|
|
|
|
63.0
|
|
|
|
74.4
|
|
|
|
63.0
|
|
Brucutu
|
|
|
429.5
|
|
|
|
50.5
|
|
|
|
252.6
|
|
|
|
47.2
|
|
|
|
682.1
|
|
|
|
49.3
|
|
|
|
659.2
|
|
|
|
51.1
|
|
Baú
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37.1
|
|
|
|
55.7
|
|
|
|
37.1
|
|
|
|
55.7
|
|
|
|
37.1
|
|
|
|
55.7
|
|
Apolo
|
|
|
145.2
|
|
|
|
60.3
|
|
|
|
133.5
|
|
|
|
56.2
|
|
|
|
278.7
|
|
|
|
58.3
|
|
|
|
278.7
|
|
|
|
58.3
|
|
Andrade(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120.9
|
|
|
|
59.2
|
|
Mariana complex
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alegria
|
|
|
179.1
|
|
|
|
50.2
|
|
|
|
41.3
|
|
|
|
47.1
|
|
|
|
220.5
|
|
|
|
49.7
|
|
|
|
240.8
|
|
|
|
49.7
|
|
Fábrica Nova
|
|
|
479.1
|
|
|
|
46.5
|
|
|
|
349.7
|
|
|
|
44.2
|
|
|
|
828.8
|
|
|
|
45.5
|
|
|
|
862.6
|
|
|
|
45.8
|
|
Fazendão
|
|
|
240.5
|
|
|
|
49.7
|
|
|
|
94.4
|
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
|
|
334.9
|
|
|
|
49.8
|
|
|
|
346.0
|
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
Timbopeba
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73.2
|
|
|
|
55.2
|
|
|
|
73.2
|
|
|
|
55.2
|
|
|
|
73.3
|
|
|
|
55.2
|
|
Corumbá complex(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Urucum
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
|
|
62.7
|
|
|
|
28.8
|
|
|
|
62.1
|
|
|
|
36.7
|
|
|
|
62.3
|
|
|
|
37.5
|
|
|
|
62.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Southeastern System
|
|
|
2,196.3
|
|
|
|
51.0
|
|
|
|
1,239.2
|
|
|
|
50.3
|
|
|
|
3,435.4
|
|
|
|
50.7
|
|
|
|
3,654.2
|
|
|
|
51.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Tonnage is stated in millions of
metric tons of wet
run-of-mine.
Grade is % of Fe. Approximate drill hole spacings used to
classify the reserves were: 100m x 100m to proven reserves and
200m x 200m to probable reserves.
|
(2)
|
|
Vales equity interest in
Água Limpa is 50%.
|
(3)
|
|
Vale and Companhia Siderúrgica
Belgo Mineira mutually agreed to terminate the lease for the
Andrade mine in 2009.
|
(4)
|
|
The Corumbá complex also
includes the Corumbá iron ore mine, which we acquired in
2009. We are conducting a review of the reserve model.
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iron ore reserves per mine in the Southern System(1)
|
|
|
|
Proven 2009
|
|
|
Probable 2009
|
|
|
Total 2009
|
|
|
Total 2008
|
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Minas Itabiritos complex
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segredo
|
|
|
141.1
|
|
|
|
51.9
|
|
|
|
162.7
|
|
|
|
48.2
|
|
|
|
303.9
|
|
|
|
49.9
|
|
|
|
308.6
|
|
|
|
49.9
|
|
João Pereira
|
|
|
243.6
|
|
|
|
42.8
|
|
|
|
307.5
|
|
|
|
41.5
|
|
|
|
551.1
|
|
|
|
42.0
|
|
|
|
567.4
|
|
|
|
42.1
|
|
Sapecado
|
|
|
107.7
|
|
|
|
52.7
|
|
|
|
142.5
|
|
|
|
53.5
|
|
|
|
250.2
|
|
|
|
53.1
|
|
|
|
254.4
|
|
|
|
53.2
|
|
Galinheiro
|
|
|
129.6
|
|
|
|
54.6
|
|
|
|
191.0
|
|
|
|
54.1
|
|
|
|
320.6
|
|
|
|
54.3
|
|
|
|
323.6
|
|
|
|
54.3
|
|
Vargem Grande complex
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tamanduá
|
|
|
267.1
|
|
|
|
54.8
|
|
|
|
248.4
|
|
|
|
51.3
|
|
|
|
515.4
|
|
|
|
53.1
|
|
|
|
516.0
|
|
|
|
54.5
|
|
Capitão do Mato
|
|
|
208.9
|
|
|
|
55.9
|
|
|
|
562.8
|
|
|
|
50.7
|
|
|
|
771.6
|
|
|
|
52.1
|
|
|
|
825.8
|
|
|
|
52.0
|
|
Abóboras
|
|
|
233.0
|
|
|
|
45.6
|
|
|
|
220.3
|
|
|
|
43.5
|
|
|
|
453.4
|
|
|
|
44.6
|
|
|
|
450.9
|
|
|
|
45.6
|
|
Paraopeba complex
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jangada
|
|
|
43.6
|
|
|
|
66.6
|
|
|
|
15.2
|
|
|
|
66.2
|
|
|
|
58.8
|
|
|
|
66.5
|
|
|
|
61.3
|
|
|
|
66.5
|
|
Córrego do Feijão
|
|
|
30.3
|
|
|
|
67.0
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
63.1
|
|
|
|
33.6
|
|
|
|
66.6
|
|
|
|
35.0
|
|
|
|
66.6
|
|
Capão Xavier
|
|
|
84.5
|
|
|
|
65.1
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
|
|
|
64.3
|
|
|
|
93.8
|
|
|
|
65.0
|
|
|
|
103.0
|
|
|
|
65.0
|
|
Mar Azul
|
|
|
18.8
|
|
|
|
58.6
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
58.7
|
|
|
|
20.6
|
|
|
|
58.6
|
|
|
|
26.6
|
|
|
|
55.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Southern System
|
|
|
1,508.2
|
|
|
|
52.4
|
|
|
|
1,864.8
|
|
|
|
49.0
|
|
|
|
3,373.0
|
|
|
|
50.5
|
|
|
|
3,472.6
|
|
|
|
50.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Tonnage is stated in millions of
metric tons of wet
run-of-mine.
Grade is % of Fe. Approximate drill hole spacings used to
classify the reserves were: 100m x 100m to proven reserves and
200m x 200m to probable reserves.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iron ore reserves per mine in the Northern System(1)
|
|
|
|
Proven 2009
|
|
|
Probable 2009
|
|
|
Total 2009
|
|
|
Total 2008
|
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Serra Norte complex
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N4W
|
|
|
1,243.5
|
|
|
|
66.5
|
|
|
|
283.7
|
|
|
|
66.1
|
|
|
|
1,527.3
|
|
|
|
66.5
|
|
|
|
1,569.7
|
|
|
|
66.5
|
|
N4E
|
|
|
315.8
|
|
|
|
66.6
|
|
|
|
92.2
|
|
|
|
66.0
|
|
|
|
408.0
|
|
|
|
66.4
|
|
|
|
427.7
|
|
|
|
66.4
|
|
N5(2)
|
|
|
377.6
|
|
|
|
67.3
|
|
|
|
485.1
|
|
|
|
66.9
|
|
|
|
862.7
|
|
|
|
67.1
|
|
|
|
904.1
|
|
|
|
67.1
|
|
Serra Sul
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S11
|
|
|
3,045.8
|
|
|
|
66.8
|
|
|
|
1,193.7
|
|
|
|
66.7
|
|
|
|
4,239.6
|
|
|
|
66.8
|
|
|
|
4,239.6
|
|
|
|
66.8
|
|
Serra Leste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SL1
|
|
|
55.7
|
|
|
|
66.2
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
66.4
|
|
|
|
60.9
|
|
|
|
66.2
|
|
|
|
60.9
|
|
|
|
66.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Northern System
|
|
|
5,038.5
|
|
|
|
66.7
|
|
|
|
2,060.0
|
|
|
|
66.6
|
|
|
|
7,098.5
|
|
|
|
66.7
|
|
|
|
7,202.0
|
|
|
|
66.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Tonnage is stated in millions of
metric tons of wet
run-of-mine.
Grade is % of Fe. Approximate drill hole spacings used to
classify the reserves are: 150m x 100 m to proven reserves and
300m x 200m to probable reserves, except SL1 which is 100m x
100m to proven reserves and 200m x 200m to probable reserves.
|
(2)
|
|
Reserves previously classified
under N5W and N5E are now grouped as the N5 reserve model.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iron ore reserves per Samarco mine
|
|
|
|
Proven 2009
|
|
|
Probable 2009
|
|
|
Total 2009
|
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Samarco
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alegria Norte/Centro
|
|
|
720.7
|
|
|
|
44.3
|
|
|
|
555.6
|
|
|
|
40.7
|
|
|
|
1,276.3
|
|
|
|
42.7
|
|
Alegria Sul
|
|
|
451.4
|
|
|
|
39.8
|
|
|
|
383.6
|
|
|
|
38.6
|
|
|
|
835.0
|
|
|
|
39.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Samarco
|
|
|
1,172.1
|
|
|
|
42.5
|
|
|
|
939.1
|
|
|
|
39.8
|
|
|
|
2,111.2
|
|
|
|
41.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in iron ore reserves reflect mining production during
2008 and small changes in new updated geological models or pit
designs and reserve classification.
55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other mine data: Southeastern System iron ore mines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type
|
|
Operating since
|
|
|
exhaustion date
|
|
|
Vale interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
Itabira complex
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conceição
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
1957
|
|
|
|
2023
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Minas do Meio
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
1976
|
|
|
|
2023
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Minas Centrais complex
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
Água Limpa
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
2000
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
Gongo Soco
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
2000
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Brucutu
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
1994
|
|
|
|
2023
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Baú
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2029
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Apolo
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2029
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Mariana complex
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alegria
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
2000
|
|
|
|
2024
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Fábrica Nova
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
2033
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Fazendão
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
1976
|
|
|
|
2040
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Timbopeba(1)
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
1984
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Corumbá complex
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Urucum
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
1994
|
|
|
|
2023
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The Timbopeba mine is running below
full capacity, and we are reviewing its life of mine.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other mine data: Southern System iron ore mines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type
|
|
Operating since
|
|
|
exhaustion date
|
|
|
Vale interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
Minas Itabiritos complex
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segredo
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
2034
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
João Pereira
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
2034
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Sapecado
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
1942
|
|
|
|
2030
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Galinheiro
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
1942
|
|
|
|
2030
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Vargem Grande complex
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tamanduá
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
1993
|
|
|
|
2039
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Capitão do Mato
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
1997
|
|
|
|
2040
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Abóboras
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
2029
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Paraopeba complex
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jangada
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Córrego do Feijão
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Capão Xavier
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
2021
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Mar Azul
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other mine data: Northern System iron ore mines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type
|
|
Operating since
|
|
|
exhaustion date
|
|
|
Vale interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
Serra Norte
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N4W
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
1994
|
|
|
|
2028
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
N4E
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
1984
|
|
|
|
2024
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
N5
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
1998
|
|
|
|
2024
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Serra Sul
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S11
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2059
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Serra Leste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SL1
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2039
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other mine data: Samarco iron ore mines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected
|
|
|
|
|
Type
|
|
Operating since
|
|
exhaustion date
|
|
Vale interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
Samarco
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alegria Norte/Centro
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
2000
|
|
|
|
2052
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
Alegria Sul
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
2000
|
|
|
|
2052
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
Manganese
ore reserves
In preparing manganese reserve data, we used price assumptions
that did not exceed the three-year (2007 to
2009) historical average price for manganese of US$353.76
per metric ton (published by CRU, CIF China, 44% manganese
grade). We have adjusted ore reserve estimates for extraction
losses and metallurgical recoveries during extraction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manganese ore reserves(1)
|
|
|
|
Proven 2009
|
|
|
Probable 2009
|
|
|
Total 2009
|
|
|
Total 2008
|
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Azul
|
|
|
43.3
|
|
|
|
41.1
|
|
|
|
8.5
|
|
|
|
39.5
|
|
|
|
51.8
|
|
|
|
40.9
|
|
|
|
42.6
|
|
|
|
35.2
|
|
Urucum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
|
|
45.1
|
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
|
|
45.1
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
|
|
44.4
|
|
Morro da Mina
|
|
|
9.2
|
|
|
|
24.3
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
24.3
|
|
|
|
15.2
|
|
|
|
24.3
|
|
|
|
15.3
|
|
|
|
24.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
52.5
|
|
|
|
38.2
|
|
|
|
21.4
|
|
|
|
37.0
|
|
|
|
73.9
|
|
|
|
37.9
|
|
|
|
64.9
|
|
|
|
33.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Tonnage is stated in millions of
metric tons of wet
run-of-mine.
Grade is % of Mn.
|
Our manganese ore reserve estimates increased in 2009, due to
new reserves at the Azul mine (pit and talings ore). The cut off
grade in the Azul mine changed, based on the new product
specifications required by the market. New ore bodies were
discovered in the 2008/2009 geological exploration program. In
addition, reserves also included some tailing material from the
Azul tailing dam that could be recovered in the mineral
processing plant after the reconstruction occurred in 2007.
Based on these new assumptions, some new materials were included
in these new reserves.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other mine data: manganese ore mines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected
|
|
|
|
|
Type
|
|
Operating since
|
|
exhaustion date
|
|
Vale interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
Azul
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
1985
|
|
|
|
2022
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Urucum
|
|
Underground
|
|
|
1976
|
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Morro da Mina
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
1902
|
|
|
|
2045
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
57
Nickel
ore reserves
In preparing nickel reserve data, we used price assumptions that
did not exceed the three-year (2007 to 2009) historical
average LME spot price for nickel of US$24,281 per metric ton.
Our nickel reserve estimates are of in-place material after
adjustments for mining depletion and mining losses (or screening
and drying in the cases of Sulawesi and Goro) and recoveries,
with no adjustments made for metal losses due to processing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nickel ore reserves(1)
|
|
|
|
Proven 2009
|
|
|
Probable 2009
|
|
|
Total 2009
|
|
|
Total 2008
|
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sudbury
|
|
|
69.9
|
|
|
|
1.23
|
|
|
|
47.0
|
|
|
|
1.15
|
|
|
|
116.9
|
|
|
|
1.20
|
|
|
|
150.4
|
|
|
|
1.17
|
|
Thompson
|
|
|
9.1
|
|
|
|
1.89
|
|
|
|
17.0
|
|
|
|
1.63
|
|
|
|
26.1
|
|
|
|
1.72
|
|
|
|
24.5
|
|
|
|
1.78
|
|
Voisey Bay
|
|
|
21.8
|
|
|
|
3.01
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
0.66
|
|
|
|
25.0
|
|
|
|
2.71
|
|
|
|
26.0
|
|
|
|
2.76
|
|
Indonesia(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sulawesi
|
|
|
82.3
|
|
|
|
1.84
|
|
|
|
38.8
|
|
|
|
1.70
|
|
|
|
121.1
|
|
|
|
1.79
|
|
|
|
152.7
|
|
|
|
1.77
|
|
New Caledonia(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goro
|
|
|
100.8
|
|
|
|
1.35
|
|
|
|
23.5
|
|
|
|
1.91
|
|
|
|
124.3
|
|
|
|
1.46
|
|
|
|
124.3
|
|
|
|
1.46
|
|
Brazil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Onça Puma
|
|
|
55.1
|
|
|
|
1.79
|
|
|
|
27.6
|
|
|
|
1.62
|
|
|
|
82.7
|
|
|
|
1.73
|
|
|
|
82.7
|
|
|
|
1.73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
339.0
|
|
|
|
1.64
|
|
|
|
157.1
|
|
|
|
1.52
|
|
|
|
496.1
|
|
|
|
1.60
|
|
|
|
560.6
|
|
|
|
1.58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Tonnage is stated in millions of
dry metric tons. Grade is % of nickel.
|
(2)
|
|
We have rights to other properties
in Indonesia, New Caledonia and in other locations, which have
not yet been fully explored.
|
In Canada, reserves at our Sudbury operations decreased due
primarily to mining depletion and reclassification of mineral
reserves to mineral resources at the non-operating Creighton 3
Shaft and Kelly Lake deposits, partially offset by exploration
additions at our operating mines. Reserves at our Thompson
operations increased slightly due to exploration. Reserves at
our Voisey Bay operations decreased primarily due to mining
depletion. This reduction is supported by the reconciliation of
production data with the
life-of-mine
plan estimates.
Reserves at Sulawesi decreased as a result of adjustments for
mining depletion, changes in plant feed chemistry operational
targets, changes to the duration of the
life-of-mine
plan (in accordance with the new mining law) and
reclassification of mineral reserves to mineral resources. These
adjustments were partially offset by drilling that converted
mineral resources to reserves.
Reserves at Goro and Onça Puma remained unchanged from 2008
estimates, since there was virtually no production at these
mines in 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other mine data: nickel ore mines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected
|
|
|
|
|
Type
|
|
Operating since
|
|
exhaustion date
|
|
Vale interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sudbury
|
|
Underground
|
|
|
1885
|
|
|
|
2040
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Thompson
|
|
Underground
|
|
|
1961
|
|
|
|
2023
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Voisey Bay
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
2022
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Indonesia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sulawesi
|
|
Open cast
|
|
|
1977
|
|
|
|
2035
|
|
|
|
59.1
|
|
New Caledonia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goro
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2041
|
|
|
|
74.0
|
|
Brazil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Onça Puma
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2042
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
58
Bauxite
ore reserves
In preparing bauxite reserve data, we used price assumptions
that did not exceed the three-year (2007 to
2009) historical average realized sales price for bauxite
of US$37.49 per metric ton. We have adjusted ore reserve
estimates for mass recoveries during washing, bone dry.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bauxite ore reserves(1)
|
|
|
|
Proven 2009
|
|
|
Probable 2009
|
|
|
Total 2009
|
|
|
Total 2008
|
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
MRN
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Almeidas
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
49.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
49.8
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
50.2
|
|
Aviso
|
|
|
14.4
|
|
|
|
49.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.4
|
|
|
|
49.7
|
|
|
|
22.1
|
|
|
|
51.2
|
|
Bacaba
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
|
|
52.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
|
|
52.2
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
|
53.5
|
|
Saracá V
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
46.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
46.8
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
47.9
|
|
Saracá W
|
|
|
11.1
|
|
|
|
48.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.1
|
|
|
|
48.9
|
|
|
|
11.7
|
|
|
|
49.8
|
|
Bela Cruz
|
|
|
50.5
|
|
|
|
51.0
|
|
|
|
24.9
|
|
|
|
50.9
|
|
|
|
75.4
|
|
|
|
51.0
|
|
|
|
67.3
|
|
|
|
52.1
|
|
Cipó
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
48.7
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
48.7
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
|
|
48.7
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
|
|
49.8
|
|
Teófilo
|
|
|
31.3
|
|
|
|
49.0
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
49.0
|
|
|
|
37.3
|
|
|
|
49.0
|
|
|
|
33.2
|
|
|
|
50.1
|
|
Aramã
|
|
|
9.7
|
|
|
|
48.7
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
48.9
|
|
|
|
11.0
|
|
|
|
48.7
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
49.8
|
|
Greigh
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
47.8
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
47.6
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
47.8
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
48.8
|
|
Monte Branco
|
|
|
18.9
|
|
|
|
47.9
|
|
|
|
26.0
|
|
|
|
47.5
|
|
|
|
44.9
|
|
|
|
47.7
|
|
|
|
41.2
|
|
|
|
48.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total MRN
|
|
|
150.1
|
|
|
|
49.7
|
|
|
|
64.3
|
|
|
|
49.2
|
|
|
|
214.3
|
|
|
|
49.6
|
|
|
|
205.4
|
|
|
|
50.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paragominas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miltonia 3
|
|
|
134.8
|
|
|
|
49.4
|
|
|
|
55.3
|
|
|
|
49.4
|
|
|
|
190.1
|
|
|
|
49.4
|
|
|
|
196.4
|
|
|
|
49.4
|
|
Miltonia 5
|
|
|
95.7
|
|
|
|
47.3
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
47.3
|
|
|
|
98.6
|
|
|
|
47.3
|
|
|
|
98.6
|
|
|
|
47.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Paragominas
|
|
|
230.5
|
|
|
|
48.5
|
|
|
|
58.2
|
|
|
|
49.3
|
|
|
|
288.7
|
|
|
|
48.7
|
|
|
|
295.0
|
|
|
|
48.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Tonnage is stated in millions of
metric tons of washed product (bone dry). Grade is % of
Al2O3.
|
MRNs bauxite reserves increased despite the depletion of
13 million metric tons in 2009 due to an update of the
geological model.
Paragominass bauxite reserves decreased primarily due to
mining depletion. The mine contains 692,000 metric tons of
stockpiled material that was taken into account in the reserve
calculations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other mine data: bauxite ore mines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected
|
|
|
|
|
Type
|
|
Operating since
|
|
exhaustion date
|
|
Vale interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
MRN
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Almeidas
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
40.0
|
|
Aviso
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
40.0
|
|
Bacaba
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
40.0
|
|
Saracá V
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
1979
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
40.0
|
|
Saracá W
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
40.0
|
|
Bela Cruz
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
40.0
|
|
Cipó
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023
|
|
|
|
40.0
|
|
Teófilo
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023
|
|
|
|
40.0
|
|
Aramã
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
40.0
|
|
Greigh
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022
|
|
|
|
40.0
|
|
Monte Branco
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
40.0
|
|
Paragominas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miltonia 3
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2032
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Miltonia 5
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2032
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
59
Copper
ore reserves
In preparing copper reserve data, we used price assumptions that
did not exceed the three-year (2007 to 2009) historical
average LME spot price for copper of US$6,414 per metric ton.
Our copper reserve estimates are of in-place material after
adjustments for mining depletion and mining losses and
recoveries, with no adjustments made for metal losses due to
processing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copper ore reserves(1)
|
|
|
|
Proven 2009
|
|
|
Probable 2009
|
|
|
Total 2009
|
|
|
Total 2008
|
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sudbury
|
|
|
69.9
|
|
|
|
1.49
|
|
|
|
47.0
|
|
|
|
1.53
|
|
|
|
116.9
|
|
|
|
1.51
|
|
|
|
150.4
|
|
|
|
1.35
|
|
Thompson
|
|
|
9.1
|
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
|
|
17.0
|
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
|
|
26.1
|
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
|
|
24.5
|
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
Voisey Bay
|
|
|
21.8
|
|
|
|
1.76
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
0.38
|
|
|
|
25.0
|
|
|
|
1.58
|
|
|
|
26.0
|
|
|
|
1.62
|
|
Brazil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sossego
|
|
|
122.1
|
|
|
|
0.91
|
|
|
|
39.3
|
|
|
|
0.91
|
|
|
|
161.4
|
|
|
|
0.91
|
|
|
|
166.5
|
|
|
|
0.93
|
|
Salobo
|
|
|
508.2
|
|
|
|
0.80
|
|
|
|
420.3
|
|
|
|
0.74
|
|
|
|
928.5
|
|
|
|
0.77
|
|
|
|
928.5
|
|
|
|
0.77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
731.1
|
|
|
|
0.90
|
|
|
|
526.8
|
|
|
|
0.80
|
|
|
|
1,257.9
|
|
|
|
0.86
|
|
|
|
1,295.9
|
|
|
|
0.86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Tonnage is stated in millions of
metric tons of dry
run-of-mine.
Grade is % of copper.
|
In Canada, our copper ore reserve estimates decreased for the
reasons discussed above in connection with nickel reserves.
In Brazil, reserves at Sossego decreased due primarily to mining
depletion and a review of pit optimization with an updated
economic model with increased operational costs. Reserves at
Salobo remain unchanged from 2008 estimates because no
production occurred in 2009. The Salobo mine is currently under
pre-stripping.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other mine data: copper ore mines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected
|
|
|
|
|
Type
|
|
Operating since
|
|
exhaustion date
|
|
Vale interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sudbury
|
|
Underground
|
|
|
1885
|
|
|
|
2040
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Thompson
|
|
Underground
|
|
|
1961
|
|
|
|
2023
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Voisey Bay
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
2022
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Brazil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sossego
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
2021
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Salobo
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2030
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Cobalt
ore reserves
In preparing cobalt reserve data, we used price assumptions that
did not exceed the three-year (2007 to 2009) historical
average realized sales price for cobalt of US$22.7 per pound. We
expect to recover significant quantities of cobalt as a
by-product of our Canadian operations and from the Goro project.
Our cobalt reserve
60
estimates are of in-place material after adjustments for mining
depletion and mining losses (or screening and drying in the case
of Goro) and recoveries, with no adjustments made for metal
losses due to processing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cobalt ore reserves(1)
|
|
|
|
Proven 2009
|
|
|
Probable 2009
|
|
|
Total 2009
|
|
|
Total 2008
|
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sudbury
|
|
|
69.9
|
|
|
|
0.04
|
|
|
|
47.0
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
116.9
|
|
|
|
0.04
|
|
|
|
150.4
|
|
|
|
0.04
|
|
Voisey Bay
|
|
|
21.8
|
|
|
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
25.0
|
|
|
|
0.13
|
|
|
|
26.0
|
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
New Caledonia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goro
|
|
|
100.8
|
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
|
|
23.5
|
|
|
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
124.3
|
|
|
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
124.3
|
|
|
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
192.6
|
|
|
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
73.7
|
|
|
|
0.05
|
|
|
|
266.3
|
|
|
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
300.7
|
|
|
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Tonnage is stated in millions of
metric tons. Grade is % of cobalt.
|
Our cobalt reserve estimates decreased in 2009 for the reasons
discussed above in connection with nickel reserves.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other mine data: cobalt ore mines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected
|
|
|
|
|
Type
|
|
Operating since
|
|
exhaustion date
|
|
Vale interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sudbury
|
|
Underground
|
|
|
1885
|
|
|
|
2040
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Voisey Bay
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
2022
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
New Caledonia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goro
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2041
|
|
|
|
74.0
|
|
PGMs and
other precious metals reserves
In preparing PGMs and other precious metals reserves data, we
used price assumptions that did not exceed the three-year (2007
to 2009) average NYMEX price for platinum of US$1,367.00
per troy ounce and the average Comex price for gold of US$847.30
per troy ounce. We expect to recover significant quantities of
precious metals as by-products of our Canadian operations,
Sossego and from the Salobo project. Our reserve estimates are
of in-place material after adjustments for mining depletion and
mining losses and recoveries, with no adjustments made for metal
losses due to processing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Precious metals reserves(1)
|
|
|
|
Proven 2009
|
|
|
Probable 2009
|
|
|
Total 2009
|
|
|
Total 2008
|
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sudbury
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Platinum
|
|
|
69.9
|
|
|
|
0.70
|
|
|
|
47.0
|
|
|
|
1.20
|
|
|
|
116.9
|
|
|
|
0.90
|
|
|
|
150.4
|
|
|
|
0.70
|
|
Palladium
|
|
|
69.9
|
|
|
|
0.80
|
|
|
|
47.0
|
|
|
|
1.40
|
|
|
|
116.9
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
150.4
|
|
|
|
0.90
|
|
Gold
|
|
|
69.9
|
|
|
|
0.30
|
|
|
|
47.0
|
|
|
|
0.50
|
|
|
|
116.9
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
150.4
|
|
|
|
0.30
|
|
Brazil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sossego
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gold
|
|
|
122.1
|
|
|
|
0.27
|
|
|
|
39.3
|
|
|
|
0.23
|
|
|
|
161.4
|
|
|
|
0.26
|
|
|
|
166.5
|
|
|
|
0.27
|
|
Salobo
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gold
|
|
|
508.2
|
|
|
|
0.48
|
|
|
|
420.3
|
|
|
|
0.43
|
|
|
|
928.5
|
|
|
|
0.46
|
|
|
|
928.5
|
|
|
|
0.46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Gold
|
|
|
700.2
|
|
|
|
0.43
|
|
|
|
506.6
|
|
|
|
0.42
|
|
|
|
1,206.8
|
|
|
|
0.43
|
|
|
|
1,245.4
|
|
|
|
0.42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Tonnage is stated in millions of
dry metric tons. Grade is grams per dry metric ton.
|
61
In Canada, our mineral reserve estimates of platinum, palladium
and gold decreased for the reasons discussed above in connection
with nickel reserves. In Brazil, reserves at Sossego decreased
due primarily to mining depletion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other mine data: precious metals mines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected
|
|
|
|
|
Type
|
|
Operating since
|
|
exhaustion date
|
|
Vale interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sudbury
|
|
Underground
|
|
|
1885
|
|
|
|
2040
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Brazil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sossego
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
2021
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Salobo
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2030
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Kaolin
ore reserves
In preparing kaolin reserve data, we used price assumptions that
did not exceed the three-year (2007 to 2009) historical
average realized sales price for kaolin of US$214.13 per metric
ton. Our reserve estimates are of in-place material after
adjustments for mining depletion and mining losses and
recoveries, with no adjustments made for metal losses due to
processing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kaolin ore reserves(1)
|
|
|
|
Proven 2009
|
|
|
Probable 2009
|
|
|
Total 2009
|
|
|
Total 2008
|
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Brightness
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Brightness
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Brightness
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Brightness
|
|
|
Morro do Felipe
|
|
|
9.1
|
|
|
|
86.6
|
|
|
|
23.0
|
|
|
|
86.8
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
|
|
86.7
|
|
|
|
32.7
|
|
|
|
86.7
|
|
Capim I
|
|
|
33.2
|
|
|
|
82.5
|
|
|
|
8.6
|
|
|
|
81.9
|
|
|
|
41.8
|
|
|
|
82.4
|
|
|
|
43.5
|
|
|
|
82.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
42.3
|
|
|
|
84.6
|
|
|
|
31.6
|
|
|
|
84.4
|
|
|
|
73.9
|
|
|
|
84.6
|
|
|
|
76.2
|
|
|
|
84.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Tonnage is stated in millions of
metric tons. Brightness is stated in percentage terms.
|
Reserves at Morro do Felipe and Capim I decreased primarily
reflecting mining depletion in 2009 and, to a lesser extent, a
reduction in estimates to reflect differences between actual
recoveries and amounts predicted by our reserve model.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other mine data: kaolin ore mines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected
|
|
|
|
|
Type
|
|
Operating since
|
|
exhaustion date
|
|
Vale interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
Morro do Felipe
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
1976
|
|
|
|
2030
|
|
|
|
86.2
|
|
Capim I
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
1996
|
|
|
|
2030
|
|
|
|
61.5
|
|
Potash
ore reserves
In preparing potash reserve data, we used price assumptions that
did not exceed the three-year (2007 to 2009) historical
average benchmark price for potash of US$521.0 per metric ton
(published by CRU BSC FOB Vancouver).
Our reserve estimates are of in-place material after adjustments
for mining depletion and mining losses and recoveries, with no
adjustments made for metal losses due to processing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potash ore reserves(1)
|
|
|
|
Proven 2009
|
|
|
Probable 2009
|
|
|
Total 2009
|
|
|
Total 2008
|
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Taquari-Vassouras
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
28.0
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
28.0
|
|
|
|
7.6
|
|
|
|
28.0
|
|
|
|
9.8
|
|
|
|
28.0
|
|
Rio Colorado
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
360.8
|
|
|
|
34.2
|
|
|
|
360.8
|
|
|
|
34.2
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
28.0
|
|
|
|
366.3
|
|
|
|
34.1
|
|
|
|
373.4
|
|
|
|
34.0
|
|
|
|
9.8
|
|
|
|
28.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Tonnage is stated in millions of
dry metric tons. Grade is % of KCI.
|
62
Our reserves increased in 2009 because we acquired Rio Colorado.
Our Taquari-Vassouras potash reserves decreased in 2009 mainly
reflecting mining depletion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other mine data: potash ore mines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected
|
|
|
|
|
Type
|
|
Operating since
|
|
exhaustion date
|
|
Vale interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
Taquari-Vassouras(1)
|
|
Underground
|
|
|
1986
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Rio Colorado
|
|
Solution mining
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2039
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
We have a
25-year
lease, which was signed in 1991, with Petrobras.
|
Phosphate
reserves
In preparing phosphate reserve data, we used price assumptions
that did not exceed the three year (2007 to
2009) historical average benchmarking prices for phosphate
concentrate of US$149.7 per metric ton (published by
CRU BSC FOB Marocco). Our phosphate
reserve estimates are of in-place material after adjustments for
mining dilution, with no adjustments made for process recovery.
The decrease in our phosphate reserves estimates reflects
adjustments in the reserve model.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phosphate reserves(1)
|
|
|
Proven 2009
|
|
Probable 2009
|
|
Total 2009
|
|
Total 2008
|
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
Grade
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
Grade
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
Grade
|
|
Tonnage
|
|
Grade
|
|
Bayóvar
|
|
|
237.1
|
|
|
|
17.3
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
15.9
|
|
|
|
239.0
|
|
|
|
17.2
|
|
|
|
247.5
|
|
|
|
17.1
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Tonnage is stated in millions of
dry metric tons. Grade is % of
P2O5.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other mine data: phosphate ore mine
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected
|
|
|
|
|
Type
|
|
Operating since
|
|
exhaustion date
|
|
Vale interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
Bayóvar
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2037
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Coal
reserves
In preparing coal reserve data, we used price assumptions that
did not exceed the following (2007 to 2009) historical
average prices (based on realized sales or reference prices):
for Australian reserves, realized prices of US$130 per metric
ton of hard metallurgical coal and US$104 per metric ton of
pulverized coal injection (PCI); realized prices of
US$58 per metric ton for the El Hatillo reserves; and for hard
metallurgical coal for Moatize reserves US$175 per metric ton
(hard coking coal FOB Australia reference price).
Our coal reserve estimates have been provided on an in-place
material basis after adjustments for mining depletion, derived
in-situ moisture content (other than Integra North Open-cut for
which air dried moisture applied), anticipated mining losses and
dilution, but excluding any adjustment for losses associated
with beneficiation of raw coal mined to meet saleable product
requirements. Our coal reserve estimates were prepared by the
following independent consultants: Colin Coxhead (Integra Coal),
SRK Consulting (Carborough Downs), MB Mining Services (Isaac
Plains), Snowden Mining Industry Consultants Pty Ltd.
63
(Moatize) and John T. Boyd Company (El Hatillo), each of whom
has consented to the inclusion of these estimates herein.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coal ore reserves(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proven
|
|
|
Probable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coal type
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Total 2009
|
|
|
Total 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
(tonnage)
|
|
|
(tonnage)
|
|
|
(calorific
|
|
|
(tonnage)
|
|
|
(calorific value)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
value)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Integra Coal:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South Open-cut
|
|
Metallurgical
& thermal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
28.5 (thermal
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28.5 (thermal
|
)
|
Middle Liddell Seam
|
|
Metallurgical
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.3
|
|
|
|
14.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Integra Coal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.3
|
|
|
|
15.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carborough Downs
|
|
Metallurgical
& PCI
|
|
|
39.1
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
44.3
|
|
|
|
31.7 (PCI
|
)
|
|
|
46.2
|
|
|
|
31.7 (PCI
|
)
|
Isaac Plains
|
|
Metallurgical,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.0 (PCI
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.0 (PCI
|
)
|
|
|
PCI & thermal
|
|
|
20.1
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
23.7
|
|
|
|
27.8 (thermal
|
)
|
|
|
23.7
|
|
|
|
27.8 (thermal
|
)
|
El Hatillo
|
|
Thermal
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
|
|
25.4 (thermal
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moatize
|
|
Metallurgical
& thermal
|
|
|
422
|
|
|
|
532
|
|
|
|
954
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
838
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
531.2
|
|
|
|
556.1
|
|
|
|
1,087.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
923.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Tonnage is stated in millions of
metric tons. All reserves are based on in-situ moisture except
for Integra North Open-cut which is reported on an air-dried
basis. Calorific value of product coal derived from
beneficiation of ROM coal is typically stated in Mj/kg.
Calorific value is used in marketing thermal and PCI coals.
Marketable coal quality reported is based on 2009 sales contract
specifications, except for Moatize.
|
Reserves at Middle Liddell Seam for Integra Underground
decreased in 2009 due to depletion. Reserves at Carborough Downs
decreased, mainly reflecting mining depletion, and an updated
reserve estimate was completed. Reserves at Isaac Plains were
maintained at the same level, mainly reflecting mining depletion
in accordance with ROM production in 2008 offset by increases
resulting from an updated reserve estimate. Reserves for El
Hatillo were included in 2009 following the completion of a
life-of-mine
options planning study. Reserves at Moatize increased,
reflecting a reserve update.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other mine data: coal mines
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
Projected
|
|
|
|
|
Type
|
|
since
|
|
exhaustion date
|
|
Vale interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
Integra Coal:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South Open-cut
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
1999
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
61.2
|
|
Middle Liddell Seam
|
|
Underground
|
|
|
1999
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
61.2
|
|
Carborough Downs
|
|
Underground
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2022
|
|
|
|
80.0
|
|
Isaac Plains
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
Broadlea
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
El Hatillo
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2021
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Moatize
|
|
Open pit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2046
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
64
CAPITAL
EXPENDITURES AND PROJECTS
Capital
expenditures
We have an extensive program of investments in the organic
growth of our businesses. During 2009, we made capital
expenditures and other investments of US$9.013 billion, of
which US$6.855 billion was on organic growth, while
US$2.157 billion was invested in maintaining existing
operations. Research and development expenditures are treated as
current expense for accounting purposes. As previously
disclosed, the 2010 investment budget approved by our Board of
Directors in October 2009 is US$12.9 billion. A large part
of the capital expenditures budget will be invested in Brazil
(US$8.165 billion, or 63.3%) and in Canada
(US$1.153 billion, or 8.9%). The remainder is allocated to
investments in Argentina, Australia, Chile, China, Indonesia,
Malaysia, Mozambique, Oman and Peru, among other countries. The
actual amount of our investment will depend on various factors,
including changes in exchange rates relative to our basic
assumptions, prices of equipment and engineering services, the
scope of projects and the pace of project execution. The
allocation of total expenditures in 2009 and budgeted
expenditures in 2010 is set forth in the following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 expenditures
|
|
|
2010 budget
|
|
|
|
|
(US$
|
million
|
)
|
|
(US$
|
million
|
)
|
|
|
(% of total
|
)
|
Organic growth
|
|
|
6,855
|
|
|
|
9,876
|
|
|
|
76.6
|
|
Project execution
|
|
|
5,845
|
|
|
|
8,647
|
|
|
|
67.1
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
1,010
|
|
|
|
1,228
|
|
|
|
9.5
|
|
Investments to support existing operations
|
|
|
2,158
|
|
|
|
3,019
|
|
|
|
23.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
9,013
|
|
|
|
12,894
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes by major business area the
breakdown of our capital expenditures in 2008 and 2009 and our
investment budget for 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010 budget
|
|
|
|
|
(US$
|
million
|
)
|
|
|
(% of total
|
)
|
|
(US$
|
million
|
)
|
|
|
(% of total
|
)
|
|
(US$
|
million
|
)
|
|
|
(% of total
|
)
|
Ferrous minerals
|
|
|
2,171
|
|
|
|
21.3
|
|
|
|
2,124
|
|
|
|
23.6
|
|
|
|
3,863
|
|
|
|
30.0
|
|
Non-ferrous minerals
|
|
|
4,614
|
|
|
|
45.3
|
|
|
|
3,144
|
|
|
|
34.9
|
|
|
|
4,075
|
|
|
|
31.6
|
|
Logistics services
|
|
|
1,952
|
|
|
|
19.2
|
|
|
|
1,985
|
|
|
|
22.0
|
|
|
|
2,654
|
|
|
|
20.6
|
|
Coal
|
|
|
392
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
564
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
|
|
892
|
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
Power generation
|
|
|
406
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
688
|
|
|
|
7.6
|
|
|
|
834
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
Steel
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
343
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
Other
|
|
|
510
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
324
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
10,191
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
9,013
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
12,894
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65
The following table sets forth total expenditures in 2009 for
our main investment projects and expenditures budgeted for those
projects in 2010, together with estimated total expenditures for
each project. The status of each project is described after the
table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual(1)
|
|
Budgeted
|
Business area
|
|
Project
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
Total(2)
|
|
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
Ferrous minerals and Logistics
|
|
Carajás additional 20 Mtpy iron ore mine
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
575
|
|
|
|
Carajás additional 30 Mtpy iron ore mine
|
|
|
384
|
|
|
|
480
|
|
|
|
2,478
|
|
|
|
Carajás Serra Sul (mine S11D) iron ore mine
|
|
|
213
|
|
|
|
1,126
|
|
|
|
11,297
|
|
|
|
Apolo iron ore mine
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
2,509
|
|
|
|
Vargem Grande Itabiritos iron ore mine
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
975
|
|
|
|
Conceição Itabiritos iron ore mine
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
1,174
|
|
|
|
Tubarão VIII pellet plant
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
636
|
|
|
|
Oman pellet plant and iron ore distribution center
|
|
|
344
|
|
|
|
484
|
|
|
|
1,356
|
|
|
|
Teluk Rubiah maritime terminal and distribution center
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-ferrous minerals
|
|
Onça Puma nickel mine
|
|
|
486
|
|
|
|
510
|
|
|
|
2,646
|
|
|
|
Totten nickel mine
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
362
|
|
|
|
Long-Harbour nickel processing facility
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
441
|
|
|
|
2,821
|
|
|
|
Tres Valles copper mine
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
Salobo copper mine
|
|
|
436
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
1,808
|
|
|
|
Salobo copper mine expansion
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
1,025
|
|
|
|
Konkola North copper mine
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
Bayóvar phosphate mine
|
|
|
296
|
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
|
566
|
|
|
|
Rio Colorado potash mine
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
304
|
|
|
|
4,118
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coal
|
|
Moatize coal mine
|
|
|
302
|
|
|
|
595
|
|
|
|
1,322
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy
|
|
Estreito hydroelectric power plant
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
703
|
|
|
|
Karebbe hydroelectric power plant
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
410
|
|
|
|
Biofuels
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
407
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
All figures presented on a cash
basis.
|
(2)
|
|
Estimated total capital expenditure
cost for each project.
|
Iron ore
and iron ore pellet projects
|
|
|
|
|
Carajás additional 20
Mtpy. This brownfield project is located in the
Northern System and consists of an expansion of the original
project (additional 10 Mtpy). Our estimated total investment in
this project is US$575 million, representing a relatively
low capital expenditure cost per ton of capacity of US$29. Our
investment will be applied in part to overhauling a dry plant
and the acquisition of a new plant.
Start-up is
scheduled for the first half of 2010.
|
|
|
|
Carajás additional 30
Mtpy. This brownfield project, also located in
the Northern System, will add 30 million metric tons per
year to our capacity with investments in the installation of a
new plant, composed of primary crushing, processing and
classification units and significant investment in logistics.
This project is currently scheduled to come on stream in the
first half of 2012, subject to obtaining the required
environmental licenses.
|
|
|
|
Vargem Grande Itabiritos. This project, in the
Southern System, also involves the construction of a
concentration plant, which will be fed by low grade iron ore
produced by the Abóboras mine, in the Vargem Grande complex
in the Southern System. It is expected to have nominal capacity
of
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
10 million metric tons per year of pellet feed.
Start-up is
expected for the second half of 2012, subject to Board approval
of the project.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conceição Itabiritos. This is a
brownfield project aimed at increasing pellet feed capacity
through the processing of low-grade itabirites. The project
involves the construction of a concentration plant to add
12 million metric tons per year to the current nominal
capacity of pellet feed, using as feed
run-of-mine
from the Conceição mine, in the Itabira complex in the
Southeastern System.
Start-up is
targeted for the second half of 2013.
|
|
|
|
Carajás Serra Sul (mine S11D). This
project, located in the Northern System, is the largest
greenfield project in our history and in the history of the iron
ore industry. We expect it to have a production capacity of
90 million metric tons of iron ore per year. Completion is
currently scheduled for the second half of 2013, subject to
obtaining the required environmental licenses. This project is
subject to approval by our Board of Directors.
|
|
|
|
Apolo. We expect this greenfield project,
located in the Southeastern System, to have production capacity
of 24 million metric tons per year and expected
start-up for
the first half of 2014, subject to Board approval.
|
|
|
|
Oman. In Oman, at the Sohar industrial
complex, we are developing a pellet plant, a bulk terminal and a
distribution center with capacity to handle 40 million
metric tons. The plant will have annual nominal production
capacity of 9 million metric tons of direct reduction
pellets. Operations are scheduled to begin in the second half of
2010.
|
|
|
|
Tubarão VIII. We are building a new
pellet plant at our existing seven-plant complex at the
Tubarão Port. We expect the plant to have production
capacity of 7.5 million metric tons per year.
Start-up is
scheduled for the second half of 2012.
|
|
|
|
Teluk Rubiah. In 2010, we will start
construction of distribution facilities in Teluk Rubiah,
Malaysia. The project comprises a maritime terminal with enough
depth to receive 400,000 dwt ore carriers and a stockyard
capable of handling up to 30 million metric tons per year
in an initial phase. There is potential to expand it in the
future to up to 90 million metric tons per year.
Start-up is
targeted for the first half of 2013, subject to Board approval
of the project.
|
Nickel
projects
|
|
|
|
|
Onça Puma. Onça Puma is a nickel
operation (mine and plant) built on deposits of nickel laterite
saprolite in the Brazilian state of Pará. We expect it to
reach nominal production capacity of 58,000 metric tons per year
of nickel contained in ferro-nickel, its final product.
Commissioning is scheduled to begin in the second half of 2010,
with commercial production starting in 2011.
|
|
|
|
Totten. We are working on the re-opening of
the Totten nickel mine in Sudbury, Ontario, which was closed in
1972. The mine will have annual production capacity of 8,200
metric tons of nickel, with copper and precious metals
(platinum, gold and silver) as by-products. Completion is
scheduled for the first half of 2011.
|
|
|
|
Long-Harbour. We are building a nickel
refining facility pursuant to a commitment with the government
of the Province of Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada. The
facility will have nominal production capacity of 50,000 metric
tons per year of finished nickel, utilizing feed from the Ovoid
mine at Voisey Bay.
Start-up is
scheduled for the first half of 2013.
|
67
Copper
projects
|
|
|
|
|
Tres Valles. We are investing in the Tres
Valles project in the Coquimbo region of Chile, which has an
estimated nominal production capacity of 18,000 metric tons per
year of copper cathode. The completion of this project is
scheduled for the second half of 2010.
|
|
|
|
Salobo. In the first phase of development of
the Salobo copper deposit in Carajás, annual nominal
capacity will be 100,000 metric tons of copper in concentrates,
with 130,000 troy ounces of gold in concentrate as a by-product.
The concentrate will be processed using conventional smelting
technology. Salobo is scheduled to come on stream in the second
half of 2011.
|
|
|
|
Salobo expansion. The project will expand the
Salobo mines production capacity from 100,000 to 200,000
metric tons per year of copper in concentrates. The scope of the
project contemplates the expansion of the industrial and support
facilities, raising the height of the tailing dam and increasing
mine movement. This project is scheduled to be completed by the
first half of 2013.
|
|
|
|
Konkola North. Konkola North, estimated to be
the second-largest known resource in the Zambian Copperbelt, is
an underground mine with estimated nominal production capacity
of 44,000 metric tons per year of copper in concentrate. This
project is part of our joint venture with African Rainbow
Minerals (ARM) in Africa. We will begin development
in the second half of 2010, and the conclusion of the project,
which is subject to Board approval, is targeted for 2013.
|
Fertilizer
nutrients projects
|
|
|
|
|
Bayóvar. We are developing a phosphate
project in Bayóvar, Peru, which consists of an open-pit
phosphate mine with nominal production capacity of
3.9 million metric tons per year and a maritime terminal.
Completion is expected in the second half of 2010. We have
started a marketing campaign and will focus on establishing
long-term contracts.
|
|
|
|
Rio Colorado. This project, in Argentina,
comprises an operation with initial nominal capacity of
2.4 million metric tons per year of potash, with potential
expansion to up to 4.35 million metric tons per year, the
construction of a
350-kilometer
railway spur, port facilities and a power plant.
Start-up is
targeted for the second half of 2013, subject to Board approval
of the project.
|
Coal
projects
|
|
|
|
|
Moatize. We have obtained all of the required
licenses from the government of Mozambique for the construction
of the Moatize mine, which will have nominal annual production
capacity of 11 million metric tons, comprising
8.5 million metric tons of metallurgical coal and
2.5 million metric tons of thermal coal. In 2008, we signed
a memorandum of understanding with the government of Mozambique
establishing railroad tariffs for the Sena-Beira line and a coal
port terminal will be built by a concessionaire owned by the
Mozambican government.
Start-up is
scheduled for the first half of 2011.
|
Energy
projects
|
|
|
|
|
Estreito. We are constructing the Estreito
hydroelectric power plant near the Tocantins River, on the
border of the Brazilian states of Maranhão and Tocantins.
The plant will have an installed capacity of 1,087 MW. We
have a 30% stake in the consortium that will build and operate
the plant. Completion is scheduled for the second half of 2010.
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
Karebbe. Karebbe will be the third
hydroelectric power plant built by PTI in Sulawesi, Indonesia.
It is intended to reduce production costs and to produce enough
energy to enable the potential expansion of annual production to
90,000 metric tons of nickel in matte.
Start-up is
scheduled for the second half of 2011.
|
|
|
|
Biofuels. We own a 41% stake in a consortium
with Biopalma da Amazônia S.A. to invest in biodiesel in
the Northern region of Brazil, using the B20 mix (20% of
biodiesel and 80% of ordinary diesel), from 2014 onwards. The
oil production related to our stake will be used to feed our
biodiesel plant, with estimated capacity of 160,000 metric tons
per year. Biodiesel production will supply our operations in
northern Brazil.
|
Steel
projects
We have the following steel projects, which will create
additional demand for our iron ore and iron ore pellets.
|
|
|
|
|
ThyssenKrupp-CSA Siderúrgica do
Atlântico Ltda (TKCSA). We have
a 26.87% stake in the TKCSA integrated steel slab plant in the
Brazilian state of Rio de Janeiro. Production of the first slab
is scheduled for the second semester. Once completed, it will
have a nominal annual production capacity of 5 million
metric tons.
|
|
|
|
Companhia Siderúrgica do Pecém
(CSP). In partnership with Dongkuk
Steel Mill Co. (Dongkuk), one of the largest steel
producers in South Korea, we are taking steps to build a steel
slab plant in the Brazilian state of Ceará. The plant will
have nominal production capacity of 3.0 million metric tons
per year, with potential for expansion to 6 million metric
tons per year in a second stage. The estimated total investment
for the first stage is US$4 billion, and our contribution
will depend on the size of our final stake in the project.
Start-up is
expected to occur in 2014. The development of this project
depends on the conclusion of feasibility studies and the
approval of CSPs shareholders.
|
|
|
|
Aços Laminados do Pará
(ALPA). We are taking steps to
implement the ALPA project, which involves the construction of a
steel plant in Marabá, in the Brazilian state of Pará.
The plant would have production capacity of 2.5 million
metric tons per year of slabs and would entail an estimated
investment of US$3.2 billion.
Start-up of
this project, which is subject to Board approval, is expected
for 2013. Our share of total investment has not yet been
determined.
|
|
|
|
Companhia Siderúrgica Ubu
(CSU). At CSU (formerly known as CSV)
we started in December 2009 the official licensing process for
an integrated steel slab project with nominal capacity of
5 million tons per year. We have initiated a feasibility
study, and
start-up is
expected for 2014. The project is subject to Board approval.
Total investment is currently estimated to be
US$6.2 billion and our share of total investment has not
yet been determined.
|
REGULATORY
MATTERS
We are subject to a wide range of governmental regulation in all
the jurisdictions in which we operate worldwide. The following
discussion summarizes the kinds of regulation that have the most
significant impact on our operations.
69
Mining
rights
In order to conduct mining activities, we generally require some
form of governmental permits, which differ in form depending on
the jurisdiction but may include concessions, licenses, claims,
tenements, leases or permits (all of which we refer to below as
concessions). Some concessions are of indefinite
duration, but many have specified expiration dates, and may not
be renewable. The legal and regulatory regime governing
concessions differs among jurisdictions, often in important
ways. For example in many jurisdictions, including Brazil,
mineral resources belong to the state and may only be extracted
pursuant to a concession. In other jurisdictions, including
Canada, a substantial part of our mining operations is conducted
pursuant to leases, often from government agencies.
The table below summarizes our principal mining concessions and
other similar rights. In addition to the concessions described
below, we have exploration licenses covering 5.1 million
hectares in Brazil and 16.1 million hectares in other
countries.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate area covered
|
|
|
Location
|
|
Concession or other right
|
|
(in hectares)
|
|
Expiration date
|
|
Brazil
|
|
Mining concessions
|
|
765,855
|
|
Undetermined
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ontario
|
|
Mining rights
|
|
82,085
|
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
Surface rights
|
|
60,000
|
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
Mining leases
|
|
14,116
|
|
2010-2028
|
|
|
License of occupation
|
|
2,939
|
|
Revocable on 30
days notice
|
Manitoba
|
|
Mineral claims
|
|
8,942(1)
|
|
2010-2015
|
|
|
Order in Council Leases
|
|
109,043
|
|
2020-2025
|
|
|
Mineral leases
|
|
4,151
|
|
2013
|
|
|
Mining claims
|
|
35,200
|
|
2010-2030
|
Newfoundland
and Labrador
|
|
Mining lease
|
|
1,600
|
|
2027
|
|
|
Surface lease
|
|
4,015
|
|
2027
|
|
|
Mineral licenses
|
|
49,450
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indonesia
|
|
Contract of Work
|
|
218,000
|
|
2025(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia
|
|
Mining tenements
|
|
32,857
|
|
2010-2040
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Caledonia
|
|
Mining concessions
|
|
20,300
|
|
2016-2051(2)
|
|
|
Mining concessions (outside the Goro project area)
|
|
12,191
|
|
2027-2040
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peru
|
|
Mining concessions
|
|
126,382
|
|
Undetermined
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Colombia
|
|
El Hatillo concessions
|
|
9,695
|
|
2027
|
|
|
Cerro Largo Sur concessions
|
|
1,092
|
|
2032
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Argentina
|
|
Mining concessions
|
|
63,978
|
|
Undetermined
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chile
|
|
Mining concessions
|
|
41,841
|
|
Undetermined
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mozambique
|
|
Mining concessions
|
|
23,780
|
|
2030
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
6,596 hectares are jointly held
with third parties.
|
(2)
|
|
Our Goro project is located on
eight mining concessions covering 6,571 hectares. Three of these
concessions are renewable in 2016 while the others are due for
renewal in 2048 and 2051.
|
(3)
|
|
The Contract of Work for our
Indonesian mining operations expires in 2025. However, under the
new Mining Law, we may be entitled to apply for at least one
10-year
extension.
|
70
Many concessions impose specific obligations on the
concessionaire governing such matters as how operations are
conducted and what investments are required to be made. For
example, under the concession for our Indonesian mining
operations (known as the Contract of Work), we are required to
construct two production plants, each in a specific region,
subject to economic and technical feasibility. Our ability to
maintain our mineral rights depends on meeting these
requirements, which often involve significant capital
expenditures and operating costs.
Regulation
of mining activities
Mining and processing are subject to extensive regulation, which
differs in each jurisdiction in which we operate. Our major
operations are subject to legislation and regulations that apply
to mining activities, which in many countries include state or
provincial law in addition to national or federal law. In
addition, many of our concessions, particularly for large
operations, impose additional obligations on the concessionaire.
The jurisdictions in which we operate typically have government
agencies that are charged with granting mining concessions and
monitoring compliance with mining law and regulations. For
example, mining activities in Brazil are supervised by the
National Mineral Production Department (Departamento Nacional
de Produção Mineral), or DNPM, an agency of the
federal Ministry of Mines and Energy.
Changes in mining legislation can have significant effects on
our operations. Among the jurisdictions in which we currently
have major operations, there are several proposed or recently
adopted changes in mining legislation that could materially
affect us. These include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
The Brazilian Ministry of Mining and Energy is planning to
propose changes to the Brazilian Mining Code, which if adopted
may have important implications for mining operations in Brazil
or require unexpected capital expenditures.
|
|
|
|
In Indonesia, a new Mining Law came into effect in January 2009
that introduces a new licensing regime. In 2010, certain
government regulations implementing the Mining Law were
promulgated, but some remain outstanding. PTI, in collaboration
with its Indonesian legal advisors, is investigating the impacts
that the new Mining Law and regulations may have on PTIs
current operations and its future prospects in Indonesia. Until
all of the implementing regulations are promulgated, we will be
unable to assess how and to what extent PTIs Contract of
Work and operations will be affected.
|
|
|
|
In New Caledonia, a new mining law was passed in March 2009
requiring new mining projects to obtain formal authorization
rather than a declaration. Our application for authorization
(replacing a 2005 declaration) must be made by April 2012 and,
once submitted, we should obtain the authorization by April
2015. We believe it is unlikely that the application for the
authorization will be rejected, but there is a risk that new
conditions will be imposed.
|
Environmental
regulations
We are also subject to environmental regulations that apply to
the specific types of mining and processing activities we
conduct. We require approvals, licenses or permits from
governmental authorities to operate, and in most jurisdictions
the development of new facilities requires us to submit
environmental impact statements for approval and often to make
additional investments to mitigate environmental impacts. We
must also operate our facilities in compliance with the terms of
the approvals, licenses or permits.
Environmental regulations affecting our operations relate, among
other matters, to emissions into the air, soil and water;
recycling and waste management; protection and preservation of
forests, coastlines, natural caverns, watersheds and other
features of the ecosystem; water use; and decommissioning and
reclamation. In many cases, the mining concessions or
environmental permits under which we operate impose specific
environmental requirements on our operations. Environmental
regulations can sometimes change and ongoing compliance can
require significant costs for capital expenditures, operating
costs, reclamation costs and
71
compliance. For example, in Brazil, a suit challenging a
Brazilian environmental decree that permits mining in certain
subterraneous areas may adversely affect our ability to conduct
some mining operations or even reserves.
Environmental legislation is becoming stricter worldwide, which
could lead to greater costs for environmental compliance. For
instance, if we are required to modify installations, develop
new operational procedures or purchase new equipment, our
environmental compliance costs could increase. In particular, we
expect heightened attention from various governments to reducing
greenhouse gas emissions as a result of concern over climate
change. For example:
|
|
|
|
|
Our operations in Canada and at PTI in Indonesia are subject to
air emission regulations that address, among other things,
sulfur dioxide
(SO2),
particulates and metals. We will be required to make significant
capital expenditures to ensure compliance with these emissions
standards. The imposition of more stringent standards in the
future, especially for
SO2and
nickel, could further increase our costs.
|
|
|
|
In 2007, the Canadian government launched its Turning the
Corner plan. The plan proposed Greenhouse Gas (GHG)
emissions reduction targets for each industrial sector. The
final targets are expected to align with the U.S. objective
of reducing emissions by 17%, below 2005 levels, by 2020. In
addition, several provinces, including Manitoba and Ontario,
have introduced mandatory emission reduction targets and
compliance mechanisms including emissions trading. Compliance
with the GHG targets will require investment in our Canadian
operations or the purchase of carbon allowances or offsets. At
this stage in the legislative process, however, it is unclear
whether additional operating or capital expenditures will be
required to comply with enacted amendments or what effect these
regulations will have on our business, financial results or cash
flow from operations.
|
|
|
|
In Canada, a number of studies have been completed or are in
progress in Sudbury and Port Colborne related to contamination
of soil and water from past and continuing activities. We are
taking steps, in partnership with other stakeholders, to
remediate the ecological impact of our activities.
|
|
|
|
The Australian government is seeking to introduce a Carbon
Pollution Reduction Scheme (CPRS) as part of an
overall strategy to address climate change and its impact, both
within Australia and globally. The government has committed to
certain reductions in greenhouse gas emissions by 2020, and
draft legislation was released in the first quarter of 2009. The
legislation has not yet been passed by the Australian
parliament. It is expected that whatever form the legislation
finally takes will include some form of a carbon tax. We are
taking steps to manage our greenhouse gas emission exposure,
including improving systems to monitor, measure and report
greenhouse gas emissions, including the cost of emissions in
modeling for decision making purposes and identifying
opportunities to reduce our carbon emissions.
|
|
|
|
In October 2009, Indonesia adopted new legislation on
Environmental Protection and Management. It sets out a broad
regulatory structure and provides that many important details
will be clarified in later implementing regulations, which the
law provides should be issued within one year of its effective
date.
|
72
Royalties
and other taxes on mining activities
We are required in many jurisdictions to pay royalties or taxes
on our revenues or profits from mineral extractions and sales.
These payments are an important element of the economic
performance of a mining operation. The following royalties and
taxes apply in some of the jurisdictions in which we have our
largest operations:
|
|
|
|
|
In Brazil, we pay a royalty known as the CFEM
(Compensação Financeira pela Exploração
de Recursos Minerais) on the revenues from the sale of
minerals we extract, net of taxes, insurance costs and costs of
transportation. The current annual rates on our products are: 2%
for iron ore, kaolin, copper, nickel, fertilizers and other
materials; 3% on bauxite, potash and manganese ore; and 1% on
gold. The Brazilian government is considering changes in the
CFEM regime. These changes will only be enforceable once a final
proposal is issued by DNPM and approved by the National
Congress. We are currently engaged in several administrative and
legal proceedings alleging that we have failed to pay the proper
amount of CFEM. See Additional informationLegal
proceedingsCFEM-related proceedings.
|
|
|
|
The Canadian provinces in which we operate charge us a tax on
profit from mining operations. Profit from mining operations is
generally determined by reference to gross revenue from the sale
of mine output and deducting certain costs, such as mining and
processing costs and investment in processing assets. The
statutory mining tax rates are 10% in Ontario; 17% in Manitoba;
and 15% in Newfoundland and Labrador.
|
|
|
|
In Indonesia, our subsidiary PTI pays a royalty fee on, among
other items, its nickel production on the concession area and
has made certain other commitments. Until March 2008 the royalty
was equal to 1.5% of revenues from sales of nickel products. As
of April 2008, the royalty payment was changed to equal a fixed
amount based on sales volume (US$78 per metric ton).
|
Regulation
of other activities
In addition to mining and environmental regulation, we are
subject to comprehensive regulatory regimes for some of our
other activities, including rail transport, electricity
generation, and oil and gas. We are also subject to more general
legislation on workers health and safety, safety and
support of communities near mines, and other matters.
Our Brazilian railroad business is subject to regulation and
supervision by the Brazilian Ministry of Transportation and the
transportation regulatory agency (Agência Nacional de
Transportes Terrestres), or ANTT, and operates pursuant to
concession contracts granted by the federal government. The
concession contracts impose certain shareholder ownership
limitations. The concession contract for FCA limits shareholder
ownership to 20% of the voting capital of the concessionaire,
unless such limit is waived by ANTT. We own 99.9% of FCA, which
ANTT has authorized. The 20% ownership limitation does not apply
to our EFVM, EFC and FNS railroads. ANTT also sets different
tariff limits for railroad services for each of the
concessionaires and each of the different products transported.
So long as these limits are respected, the actual prices charged
can be negotiated directly with the users of such services.
The MRS concession contract provides that each shareholder can
only own up to 20% of the voting capital of the concessionaire,
unless otherwise permitted by ANTT. As a result of our
acquisitions of CAEMI and Ferteco, our share in the voting
capital of MRS surpassed this threshold. As a result, Vale
waived its voting and veto rights with respect to MRS shares in
accordance with a 2006 ANTT resolution. We continue to have some
voting rights through the shareholdings of a subsidiary.
Our railroad concession contracts have a duration of
30 years and are renewable. The FCA and MRS concessions
expire in 2026, and the concessions for EFC and EFVM expire in
2027. We also own the
73
subconcession for commercial operation for 30 years of a
720-kilometer
segment of the FNS railroad, in Brazil. This concession expires
in 2037.
In connection with the approval in 2006 of our acquisition of
Vale Inco, we made a number of undertakings to the Canadian
Minister of Industry under the Investment Canada Act. We believe
we are substantially in compliance with these undertakings,
which include locating our global nickel business in Toronto,
Canada; accelerating the Voisey Bay development project;
enhancing investments in a number of areas in Canada; and
honoring agreements with provincial governments, local
governments, labor unions and aboriginal groups.
Some of our products are subject to regulations applicable to
the marketing and distribution of chemicals and other
substances. For example, the European Commission has adopted a
European Chemicals Policy, known as REACH (Registration,
Evaluation, and Authorization of Chemicals). Under REACH,
manufacturers and importers will be required to register new
substances prior to their entry into the European market and in
some cases may be subject to an authorization process. A company
that fails to comply with the REACH regulation could face
restrictions to commercialize its products in Europe. We have
complied with registration requirements for the substances we
import into or manufacture in the EU and continue to take
measures to manage our exposure to the authorization process.
|
|
II.
|
OPERATING
AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS
|
Overview
The year 2009 was a year of significant challenges brought on by
a major recession that caused one of the few episodes of global
GDP contraction over the last 40 years. As a producer of
minerals and metals, the end consumers of our products are
primarily the manufacturing and construction industries, two of
the most cyclical components of economic activity and thus
severely affected by recessions.
While severe economic downturns often cause serious negative
effects on financial and operational performance, they also
create extraordinary opportunities for companies that embrace
change and structural transformation. We have leveraged our
competitive advantages low-cost, world-class assets,
a healthy balance sheet, a large pool of liquidity, discipline
in capital allocation, a highly skilled and motivated labor
force and an entrepreneurial spirit to launch
several initiatives to make us stronger in the future, seeking
to reduce costs on a permanent basis and increase efficiency. We
have not cancelled any investment project, and we have
identified new growth opportunities, and as a result we believe
our growth potential has been enhanced.
Despite weaker performance compared to previous years, our
response to the recessionary environment has heightened our
capacity to create sustainable shareholder value. Below are the
main highlights of Vales performance in 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
Gross operating revenue of US$23.9 billion;
|
|
|
|
Net income of US$5.3 billion, or US$1.00 per share on a
fully diluted basis;
|
|
|
|
Operating margin, measured as the ratio of operating income to
net operating revenues, of 26.0%;
|
|
|
|
Operating income of US$6.1 billion;
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures, including organic growth and maintenance,
reached US$9.0 billion; and
|
|
|
|
Strong financial position, supported by large cash holdings of
US$11.0 billion, availability of significant medium and
long-term credit lines and a low-risk debt portfolio.
|
74
Demand
and prices
The following table sets forth our average realized prices for
our principal products for each of the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(US$ per metric ton, except where indicated)
|
|
Iron ore
|
|
|
40.00
|
|
|
|
45.33
|
|
|
|
67.32
|
|
|
|
55.99
|
|
Iron ore pellets
|
|
|
75.21
|
|
|
|
78.62
|
|
|
|
131.76
|
|
|
|
73.75
|
|
Manganese
|
|
|
70.60
|
|
|
|
107.34
|
|
|
|
350.46
|
|
|
|
147.06
|
|
Ferroalloys
|
|
|
886.97
|
|
|
|
1,311.48
|
|
|
|
2,709.60
|
|
|
|
1,395.26
|
|
Nickel
|
|
|
31,981.53
|
|
|
|
37,442.28
|
|
|
|
21,662.14
|
|
|
|
14,596.55
|
|
Copper
|
|
|
6,380.84
|
|
|
|
6,611.27
|
|
|
|
6,331.07
|
|
|
|
5,229.39
|
|
Kaolin
|
|
|
164.78
|
|
|
|
195.88
|
|
|
|
194.06
|
|
|
|
216.52
|
|
Potash
|
|
|
195.09
|
|
|
|
264.09
|
|
|
|
591.18
|
|
|
|
521.46
|
|
Platinum (US$/oz)
|
|
|
1,115.59
|
|
|
|
1,314.25
|
|
|
|
1,557.07
|
|
|
|
1,073.98
|
|
Cobalt (US$/lb)
|
|
|
14.93
|
|
|
|
24.56
|
|
|
|
31.01
|
|
|
|
10.03
|
|
Aluminum
|
|
|
2,558.76
|
|
|
|
2,784.70
|
|
|
|
2,805.86
|
|
|
|
1,686.87
|
|
Alumina
|
|
|
343.99
|
|
|
|
338.76
|
|
|
|
348.42
|
|
|
|
226.46
|
|
Bauxite
|
|
|
30.46
|
|
|
|
36.08
|
|
|
|
41.47
|
|
|
|
34.15
|
|
Coal:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thermal coal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53.73
|
|
|
|
85.38
|
|
|
|
66.60
|
|
Metallurgical coal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67.37
|
|
|
|
170.55
|
|
|
|
115.55
|
|
Iron
ore and iron ore pellets
Demand for our iron ore and iron ore pellets is a function of
global demand for carbon steel. Demand for carbon steel, in
turn, is strongly influenced by global industrial production.
Iron ore and iron ore pellets are priced according to the wide
array of quality levels and physical characteristics. Various
factors influence price differences among the various types of
iron ore, such as the iron content of specific ore deposits, the
various beneficiation and purifying processes required to
produce the desired final product, particle size, moisture
content, and the type and concentration of contaminants (such as
phosphorus, alumina and manganese ore) in the ore. Fines, lump
ore and pellets typically command different prices.
In general, our iron ore sales are made pursuant to long-term
supply contracts. Since April 2010, we reached agreements on a
new iron ore pricing regime with the majority of our customers
around the world based on short-term market references and price
changes on a quarterly basis. These agreements, some of which
are permanent and some of which are provisional, reached 97% of
our customer base, which corresponds to 90% of sales volumes
under contracts. Previously, a majority of our contracts
provided for annual price adjustments. Our 2009 annual reference
prices for iron ore fines decreased by 28.2%, and prices for our
iron ore pellets were 44.5% lower than in 2008. Carajás
iron ore fines were priced at a premium of US$0.0444 per dry
metric ton Fe unit over the 2009 reference price for fines from
the Southeastern and Southern Systems.
Chinese iron ore imports in 2009 reached an all-time high of
627.8 million metric tons, up 41.6% on a
year-on-year
basis, driven by steel production growth and the increasing
reliance on imported iron ore.
We expect Chinese imports to remain at a high level in 2010,
primarily due to strength in the final demand for carbon steel.
The increase in capacity utilization rates of the steel industry
in Japan, Korea, Brazil and Europe, although somewhat below
pre-crisis levels, coupled with very large Chinese import
volumes, has produced a dramatic change in the global iron ore
market from surplus to excess demand, and these conditions
should persist.
75
Manganese
and ferroalloys
The prices of manganese ore and ferroalloys are influenced by
trends in the carbon steel market. Ferroalloy prices are also
influenced by the prices of the main production inputs, such as
manganese ore, power and coke. Price negotiations for manganese
ore are held mainly on a spot or quarterly basis. Ferroalloy
prices are settled on a quarterly basis.
Nickel
Nickel is an exchange-traded metal, listed on the LME, that is
mainly used to produce stainless steel. Most nickel products are
priced according to a discount or premium to the LME price,
depending on the nickel products physical and technical
characteristics. Demand for nickel is strongly affected by
stainless steel production, which corresponds on average to
60-65% of
global nickel consumption. Nickel demand for sources of
consumption other than stainless steel production represents
35-40% of
global nickel consumption.
We have short-term fixed-volume contracts with customers for the
majority of our expected annual nickel sales. These contracts,
together with our sales for non-stainless steel applications
(alloy steels, high nickel alloys, plating and batteries),
provide stable demand for a significant portion of our annual
production. In 2009, 59% of our refined nickel sales were made
into non-stainless steel applications, compared to the industry
average for primary nickel producers of 35%. As a result of our
focus on such higher-value segments, our average realized nickel
prices for refined nickel have typically exceeded LME cash
nickel prices.
Primary nickel (including ferro-nickel, nickel pig iron and
nickel cathode) and secondary nickel (i.e., scrap) are competing
nickel sources for stainless steel production. The choice
between different types of primary and secondary nickel is
largely driven by their relative price and availability. In
2009, the stainless steel scrap ratio fell from 49% to 43%.
Nickel pig iron production is estimated to have reached 7% of
the global supply of primary nickel, compared to 5% in 2008.
We expect strong demand for nickel in 2010. Stainless steel
production is picking up in 2010 in major Asian producing
countries, including China, Japan, Korea and Taiwan. In North
America and Europe utilization rates are also increasing. The
per capita consumption of stainless steel in high-growth
emerging economies is still low, and there is still great
potential for demand of non-stainless steel applications to
grow. The demand for nickel in plating applications is expanding
as a consequence of the recovery of the automobile industry.
Similarly, there is growing demand for non-stainless steel
applications originating from a number of industries including
aerospace, energy, electronics and batteries.
Aluminum
Our sales of aluminum are realized at prices based on the LME of
the previous month. Our sales of alumina are based on a
percentage of the aluminum price traded on the LME, and our
prices for bauxite are determined by a formula linked to the
price of aluminum for the three-month futures contracts on the
LME and to the price of alumina FOB Australia.
Copper
Growth in copper demand in recent years has been driven
primarily by Chinese imports. Copper prices are determined on
the basis of (i) prices of copper metal on terminal
markets, such as the LME and the NYMEX, and (ii) in the
case of intermediate products such as copper concentrate and
copper anode (which comprise most of our sales), treatment and
refining charges negotiated with each customer. Under a pricing
system referred to as MAMA (month after month of
arrival), sales of copper concentrates and anodes are
provisionally priced at the time of shipment, and final prices
are settled on the basis of the LME price for a future period,
generally one to three months after the shipment date.
76
Copper consumption is expanding at a brisk pace, partly as a
result of the broadening global economic recovery. Given the
structural limitations to supply growth of concentrates, there
is fundamental support for the persistence of a relatively high
price level.
Fertilizer
nutrients
Demand for fertilizers is driven by agricultural production,
which is a function of food demand and driven mainly by
population growth, age distribution, economic development and
dietary preferences. Demand is also driven by bio-fuels
production, which is a function of economic growth,
competitiveness in relation to fossil fuels and environmental
regulations.
Price negotiations for fertilizers are mainly held in a spot
basis following international benchmarks, despite some large
importers, such as China and India, which often sign annual
contracts. Seasonality is an important factor for price
determination throughout the year, since agricultural production
in each region depends on climate conditions for crop production.
Coal
Demand for metallurgical coal is driven by demand for steel,
especially in Asia. Demand for thermal coal is closely related
to electricity consumption, which will continue to be driven by
global economic growth, particularly from emerging markets
economies. Price negotiations for metallurgical coal are mainly
held on an annual basis. Price negotiations for thermal coal are
held both on a spot and annual basis.
Logistics
Demand for our transportation services in Brazil is primarily
driven by Brazilian economic growth, mainly in the agricultural
and steel sectors. We earn our logistics revenues primarily from
fees charged to customers for the transportation of cargo via
our railroads, port and ships. Our railways generate most of
these revenues. Nearly all of our logistics revenues are
denominated in reais and subject to adjustments for
changes in fuel prices. Prices in the Brazilian market for
railroad services are subject to ceilings set by the Brazilian
regulatory authorities, but they primarily reflect competition
with the trucking industry.
Production
levels
Our financial performance depends, among other factors, on the
volume of production at our facilities. Increases in the
capacity of our facilities, resulting from our capital
expenditure program, accordingly have an important effect on our
performance. In 2008 and 2009, our results were also affected by
our decision to reduce or suspend production at several of our
facilities in late 2008 as a result of the economic crisis, and
by the resumption of normal operations in the second half of
2009 with the global economic recovery.
Our results have also been affected by acquisitions and
dispositions of businesses or assets, and they may be affected
in the future by new acquisitions or dispositions. For more
information on acquisitions and dispositions since the beginning
of 2009, see Information on the CompanyBusiness
overviewSignificant changes in our business.
Currency
price changes
Our results of operations are affected in several ways by
changes in currency exchange rates. The most important of these
are the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Most of our revenues are denominated in U.S. dollars, while
most of our costs of goods sold are denominated in other
currencies, principally the real (64% in 2009) and
the Canadian dollar (16% in 2009). As a result, changes in
exchange rates affect our costs and operating margins. Our
margins are adversely affected by a decline in the value of the
U.S. dollar.
|
77
Most of our long-term debt is denominated in
currencies other than the real, principally the
U.S. dollar (US$15,592 million at December 31,
2009). Because our functional currency for accounting purposes
is the Brazilian real, changes in the value of the
U.S. dollar against the real result in exchange gain
or loss on our net liabilities in our financial results.
|
|
|
|
|
We had real-denominated debt of US$6,952 million at
December 31, 2009. Since most of our revenue is in
U.S. dollars, we use swaps to convert our debt service from
reais to U.S. dollars. Changes in the value of the
U.S. dollar against the real result in fair value
variation on these derivatives, affecting our financial results.
For more information on our use of derivatives, see
Risk management.
|
A decline in the value of the U.S. dollar tends to result
in: (i) lower operating margins and (ii) higher
financial results due to currency gains on our net
U.S. dollar-denominated liabilities and fair value gains on
our currency derivatives. Conversely, an increase in the value
of the U.S. dollar tends to result in: (i) better
operating margins and (ii) lower financial results, due to
exchange losses on our net U.S. dollar-denominated
liabilities and fair value losses on our currency derivatives.
The U.S. dollar was strong against the real and the
Canadian dollar during the first half of 2009 but began to
depreciate in the second semester of the year. At
December 31, 2009, the U.S. dollar had depreciated
25.5% against the real and 14.1% against the Canadian
dollar relative to December 31, 2008. These currency price
changes affected our operating margins and resulted in higher
foreign exchange gains and gains on derivatives, as described
under Critical accounting policies and
estimatesDerivatives.
Operating
expenses
Our principal operating expenses consist of: (i) cost of
goods sold, (ii) selling, general and administrative
expenses and (iii) research and development expenses. Our
cost of goods sold consists of costs of energy (fuel and
electric energy), materials (such as components for railroad and
mining equipment), outsourced services (especially ore and waste
removal, transportation and maintenance), purchased products for
processing or resale (such as iron ore, iron ore pellets, nickel
and aluminum products), personnel, and depreciation and
depletion. Our selling, general and administrative expenses
consist principally of personnel expense, sales expense and
depreciation. Our research and development expenses consist
primarily of investments related to mineral exploration and
studies for the development of projects, which are recorded as
expenses until the economic viability of the related mining
activities is established.
78
Results
of operations2009 compared to 2008
Revenues
Our net operating revenues decreased 37.7%, to
US$23.311 billion, in 2009, as a result of a decline in
both volume sold and sale prices. The following table summarizes
our gross revenues by product and our net operating revenues for
the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
% change
|
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ferrous minerals:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iron ore
|
|
US$
|
17,775
|
|
|
US$
|
12,831
|
|
|
|
(27.8
|
%)
|
Iron ore pellets
|
|
|
4,301
|
|
|
|
1,352
|
|
|
|
(68.6
|
)
|
Manganese
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
(45.5
|
)
|
Ferroalloys
|
|
|
1,211
|
|
|
|
372
|
|
|
|
(69.3
|
)
|
Pig iron
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
(69.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
23,699
|
|
|
|
14,745
|
|
|
|
(37.8
|
)
|
Non-ferrous minerals:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nickel and other products(1)
|
|
|
7,829
|
|
|
|
3,947
|
|
|
|
(49.6
|
)
|
Potash
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
413
|
|
|
|
40.0
|
|
Kaolin
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
(17.2
|
)
|
Copper concentrate(2)
|
|
|
893
|
|
|
|
682
|
|
|
|
(23.6
|
)
|
Aluminum
|
|
|
3,042
|
|
|
|
2,050
|
|
|
|
(32.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
12,268
|
|
|
|
7,265
|
|
|
|
(40.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minerals and metals
|
|
|
35,967
|
|
|
|
22,010
|
|
|
|
(38.8
|
)
|
Logistic services
|
|
|
1,607
|
|
|
|
1,104
|
|
|
|
(31.3
|
)
|
Other products and services(3)
|
|
|
935
|
|
|
|
825
|
|
|
|
(11.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross revenues
|
|
|
38,509
|
|
|
|
23,939
|
|
|
|
(37.8
|
)
|
Value-added tax
|
|
|
(1,083
|
)
|
|
|
(628)
|
|
|
|
42.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating revenues
|
|
US$
|
37,426
|
|
|
US$
|
23,311
|
|
|
|
(37.7
|
%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Includes copper, precious metals,
cobalt and other by-products produced by Vale Inco.
|
(2)
|
Does not include copper produced by
Vale Inco.
|
(3)
|
Includes coal.
|
Iron ore. Gross revenues from iron ore
decreased by 27.8% primarily as a result of a 13.2% decrease in
volume sold and a 16.8% decrease in the average sale price.
Although 2009 benchmark prices were lower than 2008 benchmark
prices by 28.2% for fines and 44.5% for
lumps the average sale price for iron ore in 2009
was only 16.8% lower than in 2008. This is primarily because
(i) some of the 2008 benchmark prices did not take effect
until the second quarter of 2008, (ii) the 2009 benchmark
prices took effect in the second quarter of 2009 and
(ii) we began selling on a cost and freight basis in early
2009 in accordance with a more flexible stance towards iron ore
pricing.
Iron ore pellets. Gross revenues from iron ore
pellets decreased by 68.6% due to a 43.9% reduction in volume
sold as a result of weakened demand, and a 44.0% decrease in
average sale prices. During an economic downturn, demand for
iron ore pellets tends to be negatively affected earlier and
more strongly than the demand for iron ore fines.
Manganese ore. Gross revenues from manganese
ore decreased by 45.5% due primarily to lower prices. The effect
of lower prices was partially offset by higher volume sold as a
result of strong Chinese demand.
79
Ferroalloys. Gross revenues from ferroalloys
decreased by 69.3% due to a 48.5% decline in average selling
prices and a 36.1% decrease in volume sold. The decline in
volume is primarily attributable to a decline in demand.
Nickel and other products. Gross revenues from
this segment decreased by 49.6%, mainly due to the following
factors:
|
|
|
|
|
Gross revenues from nickel sales decreased 45.4%, to
US$3.260 billion in 2009 from US$5.970 billion in
2008. Due to weaker demand, average nickel prices declined
32.6%. Volume sold declined by 18.8% in 2009, primarily due to
lower demand and the shutdown of our Sudbury and Voisey Bay
operations as a result of labor strikes in the second half of
2009.
|
|
|
|
Gross revenues from copper sales decreased by 60.5%, from
US$1.136 billion in 2008 to US$449 million in 2009,
primarily due to a 52.7% drop in volume sold due to the
shutdowns described above.
|
|
|
|
Gross revenues from sales of precious metals and other products
decreased 61.4%, from US$511 million in 2008 to
US$197 million in 2009, primarily due to a decline in
volume sold.
|
Potash. Gross revenues from sales of potash
increased by 40.0%. The increase was due to a 58.7% increase in
volume sold as a result of the strong performance of the
Brazilian agricultural sector, which was partially offset by an
11.8% decline in average selling prices compared to the prior
year.
Kaolin. Gross revenues from sales of kaolin
decreased by 17.2%, due principally to a 25.8% decrease in
volume, which was partially offset by an 11.6% increase in the
average sale price.
Copper concentrate. Gross revenues from sales
of copper concentrate decreased by 23.6% due to a 5.3% decrease
in volume sold and a 19.3% decrease in the average sale price.
Aluminum. Gross revenues from our aluminum
business decreased by 32.6%. This decrease is attributable to
the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
Gross revenues from sales of aluminum decreased 44.7%, from
US$1.545 billion in 2008 to US$855 million in 2009,
primarily due to a 40% decline in the average sale price.
|
|
|
|
Gross revenues from sales of alumina decreased 19.2%, from
US$1.470 billion in 2008 to US$1.188 billion in 2009
due to a 34.9% lower average sale price. The decline was
partially offset by a 24.3% increase in volume sold.
|
|
|
|
Gross revenues from sales of bauxite decreased 74.1%, from
US$27 million in 2008 to US$7 million in 2009, due to
a reduction in volume sold.
|
Logistics services. Gross revenues from
logistics services decreased by 31.3%. The decrease reflects the
following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from railroad transportation decreased by 35.7%, from
US$1.303 billion in 2008 to US$838 million in 2009,
primarily reflecting the drop in Brazilian exports in 2009,
which caused a sharp decline in the volume of steel inputs and
products transported.
|
|
|
|
Revenues from port operations decreased by 13.2%, from
US$304 million in 2008 to US$264 million in 2009,
reflecting weaker demand.
|
Other products and services. Gross revenues
from other products and services decreased from
US$935 million in 2008 to US$825 million in 2009,
primarily due to lower revenue from coal sales, which was
partially offset by higher revenue from sales of electricity.
80
Operating
costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
% change
|
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of ores and metals
|
|
US$
|
14,055
|
|
|
US$
|
10,026
|
|
|
|
(28.7
|
%)
|
Cost of logistic services
|
|
|
930
|
|
|
|
779
|
|
|
|
(16.2
|
)
|
Cost of aluminum products
|
|
|
2,267
|
|
|
|
2,087
|
|
|
|
(7.9
|
)
|
Others
|
|
|
389
|
|
|
|
729
|
|
|
|
87.4
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
17,641
|
|
|
|
13,621
|
|
|
|
(22.8
|
)
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
1,748
|
|
|
|
1,130
|
|
|
|
(35.4
|
)
|
Research and development
|
|
|
1,085
|
|
|
|
981
|
|
|
|
(9.6
|
)
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
950
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100.0
|
)
|
Other costs and expenses
|
|
|
1,254
|
|
|
|
1,522
|
|
|
|
21.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses
|
|
US$
|
22,678
|
|
|
US$
|
17,254
|
|
|
|
(23.9
|
%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of
goods sold
The following table summarizes the components of our cost of
goods sold for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
% change
|
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outsourced services
|
|
US$
|
2,880
|
|
|
US$
|
2,264
|
|
|
|
(21.4
|
%)
|
Materials costs
|
|
|
2,900
|
|
|
|
2,698
|
|
|
|
(7.0
|
)
|
Energy:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel
|
|
|
1,842
|
|
|
|
1,277
|
|
|
|
(30.7
|
)
|
Electric energy
|
|
|
1,078
|
|
|
|
844
|
|
|
|
(21.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
2,920
|
|
|
|
2,121
|
|
|
|
(27.4
|
)
|
Acquisition of iron ore and pellets
|
|
|
1,179
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
(86.9
|
)
|
Acquisition of other products:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nickel
|
|
|
687
|
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
(60.6
|
)
|
Aluminum
|
|
|
317
|
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
(12.0
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
22.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
1,035
|
|
|
|
588
|
|
|
|
(43.2
|
)
|
Personnel
|
|
|
2,139
|
|
|
|
1,939
|
|
|
|
(9.4
|
)
|
Depreciation and depletion
|
|
|
2,664
|
|
|
|
2,332
|
|
|
|
(12.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Others
|
|
|
1,924
|
|
|
|
1,524
|
|
|
|
(20.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
US$
|
17,641
|
|
|
US$
|
13,621
|
|
|
|
(22.8
|
%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our total cost of goods sold decreased 22.8% from 2008 to 2009.
The decline is attributable to the decline in volume sold,
exchange rate variations and our efforts to reduce costs. Of the
US$4,020 million decline in cost of goods sold, lower
volume sold and exchange rate variations were responsible for
US$2,738 million and US$895 million, respectively.
Further details are set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
Outsourced services. Outsourced services costs
decreased by 21.4% in 2009 due to lower volume sold.
|
|
|
|
Material costs. Material costs decreased by
7.0% in 2009, primarily reflecting lower volume sold, the effect
of which was partially offset by increased maintenance expenses
due to the acceleration of scheduled maintenance for some
operations and the higher value of the Brazilian real
against the U.S. dollar.
|
|
|
|
Energy costs. Energy costs decreased by 27.4%
in 2009 driven primarily by lower volume sold, lower average
prices and exchange rate changes.
|
81
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel costs. Personnel costs decreased by
9.4%, mainly due to lower staffing levels and the effects of
idle capacity, which were offset by the impact of wage increases
pursuant to a two-year agreement with our Brazilian employees
entered into in November 2009.
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of products. Costs related to the
acquisition of iron ore and iron ore pellets decreased by 86.9%,
and costs related to the acquisition of other products declined
by 43.2%. These declines were primarily driven by lower
purchased volumes of iron ore, iron ore pellets and nickel
products and lower average prices of purchased products.
|
|
|
|
Other costs. The decrease of
US$400 million in other costs was mainly due to lower lease
payments for the Tubarão pellet plants and lower demurrage
charges, both due to lower volume sold.
|
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased by 35.4%,
or US$618 million. The
year-on-year
comparison reflects an adjustment of US$316 million related
to copper sales recognized in 2008, when sharply declining
copper prices in the fourth quarter resulted in an adjustment to
sales based on provisional prices in earlier quarters.
Research
and development expenses
Research and development expenses decreased by 9.6%. The
US$104 million decrease primarily reflects lower research
expenditures related to copper, nickel, coal and logistics and
was partially offset by an increase in research expenditures
related to gas and energy.
Impairment
of goodwill
No impairment was registered in 2009. In 2008, we recognized a
US$950 million impairment of the goodwill associated with
our 2006 acquisition of Vale Inco.
Other
costs and expenses
Other costs and expenses increased by US$268 million,
primarily as a result of an idle capacity increase of
US$880 million. The impact on the comparison was partially
offset by the effects in 2008 of one-off tax assessments on
third-party railroad transportation services used in our iron
ore operations in previous years (US$204 million), a
provision for loss on materials (US$199 million) and a fair
value assessment of nickel inventories (US$77 million).
82
Operating
income by segment
The following table provides information about our operating
income by segment and as a percentage of revenues for the years
indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Segment operating income (loss)
|
|
|
Segment operating income (loss)
|
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
(% of net operating
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
(% of net operating
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
revenues)
|
|
|
|
|
|
revenues)
|
|
|
Ferrous minerals:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iron ore
|
|
US$
|
9,988
|
|
|
|
57.4
|
%
|
|
US$
|
6,659
|
|
|
|
52.6
|
%
|
Iron ore pellets
|
|
|
1,606
|
|
|
|
39.1
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
Manganese ore
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
67.3
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
21.7
|
|
Ferroalloys
|
|
|
604
|
|
|
|
55.8
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
Pig iron
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
52.1
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Non-ferrous minerals:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nickel and other products
|
|
|
1,131
|
|
|
|
14.4
|
|
|
|
(361
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Potash
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
50.2
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
45.5
|
|
Kaolin
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Copper concentrate
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
12.7
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
19.5
|
|
Aluminum products
|
|
|
516
|
|
|
|
17.3
|
|
|
|
(191
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Logistics:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Railroads
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
22.4
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
|
Ports
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
15.5
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
15.9
|
|
Ships
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Others
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
18.2
|
|
|
|
(503
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
US$
|
14,748
|
|
|
|
39.4
|
%
|
|
US$
|
6,057
|
|
|
|
26.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our operating income decreased as a percentage of net operating
revenues, from 39.4% in 2008 to 26.0% in 2009, due to lower
shipment volumes and prices. The effects on individual segments
are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in operating margin for iron ore and iron ore
pellets primarily reflects lower average selling prices and
volume sold.
|
|
|
|
The decrease in operating margins for manganese and ferroalloys
is attributable to lower prices.
|
|
|
|
The decrease in operating margin for potash is attributable to
lower prices.
|
|
|
|
The decrease in operating margin for nickel and other products
primarily reflects (i) the decline in average selling
prices and volume sold and (ii) the shutdown of some
operations as a result of the continuing strikes at some of our
Canadian operations.
|
|
|
|
The margin declines in the aluminum products segment resulted
primarily from lower volume sold.
|
|
|
|
The decrease in railroad margins declined due to lower volume of
transported steel products.
|
|
|
|
The increase in the copper concentrate margin reflects the
effects of recognizing price adjustments in 2008.
|
83
Non-operating
income (expenses)
The following table details our net non-operating income
(expenses) for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
Financial income
|
|
US$
|
602
|
|
|
US$
|
381
|
|
Financial expenses
|
|
|
(1,765
|
)
|
|
|
(1,558
|
)
|
Gains (losses) on derivatives, net
|
|
|
(812
|
)
|
|
|
1,528
|
|
Foreign exchange and monetary gains, net
|
|
|
364
|
|
|
|
675
|
|
Gain on sale of assets
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-operating income (expenses)
|
|
US$
|
(1,531
|
)
|
|
US$
|
1,066
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We had net non-operating income of US$1.066 billion in
2009, compared to net non-operating expenses of
US$1.531 billion in 2008. This change primarily reflects a
US$1,528 million gain on derivatives in 2009, compared to a
US$812 million loss in 2008, primarily due to swaps of
real-denominated debt into U.S. dollars. These
transactions generated a US$1,600 million gain in 2009
compared to a US$833 million loss in 2008. The change in
net non-operating income was also affected by the following
factors:
|
|
|
|
|
A decrease in financial income, principally due to lower average
interest rates on cash balances in 2009.
|
|
|
|
A decrease in financial expenses, mainly due to lower floating
interest rates.
|
|
|
|
Higher foreign exchange gains due to the depreciation of the
U.S. dollar.
|
|
|
|
A US$40 million net gain on sales of assets in 2009
compared to a US$80 million gain on sales of assets in
2008. The net gain in 2009 was primarily attributable to the
sale of shares of Usiminas (US$153 million) and the sale of
certain assets to Suzano (US$61 million), partially offset
by losses recognized on Valesul assets (US$82 million) and
UTE Barcarena (US$70 million).
|
Income
taxes
For 2009, we recorded net income tax expense of
US$2.100 billion, compared to US$535 million in 2008.
Our effective tax rate has historically been lower than the
Brazilian statutory rate because: (i) income of some
non-Brazilian subsidiaries is subject to lower rates of tax;
(ii) we are entitled under Brazilian law to deduct the
amount of our distributions to shareholders that we classify as
interest on shareholders equity; (iii) we benefit
from tax incentives applicable to our earnings on production in
certain regions of Brazil, and (iv) functional currency
movements on some non-Brazilian subsidiaries are not taxable
under Brazilian law. In addition, some of the foreign exchange
variations that affect our operating results are not taxable.
These variations produced a net exchange loss in 2009, after a
net exchange gain in 2008, and contributed to the increase in
net income tax expense in 2009.
Affiliates
and joint ventures
Our equity in the results of affiliates and joint ventures
resulted in a gain of US$433 million in 2009, compared to a
gain of US$794 million in 2008. The decrease was primarily
due to lower prices and volume sold as a result of the global
economic downturn.
84
Results
of operations2008 compared to 2007
Revenues
Our gross operating revenues rose to US$38.509 billion in
2008, a 16.3% increase over 2007. Our net operating revenues
increased 16.1% to US$37.426 billion in 2008. The following
table summarizes our gross revenues by product and our net
operating revenues for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
% change
|
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ferrous minerals:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iron ore
|
|
US$
|
11,908
|
|
|
US$
|
17,775
|
|
|
|
49.3
|
%
|
Iron ore pellets
|
|
|
2,738
|
|
|
|
4,301
|
|
|
|
57.1
|
|
Manganese
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
245.5
|
|
Ferroalloys
|
|
|
711
|
|
|
|
1,211
|
|
|
|
70.3
|
|
Pig iron
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
80.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
15,515
|
|
|
|
23,699
|
|
|
|
52.7
|
|
Non-ferrous minerals:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nickel and other products (1)
|
|
|
11,789
|
|
|
|
7,829
|
|
|
|
(33.6
|
)
|
Potash
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
65.7
|
|
Kaolin
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
|
(12.2
|
)
|
Copper concentrate (2)
|
|
|
802
|
|
|
|
893
|
|
|
|
11.3
|
|
Aluminum
|
|
|
2,722
|
|
|
|
3,042
|
|
|
|
11.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
15,729
|
|
|
|
12,268
|
|
|
|
(22.0
|
)
|
Total minerals and metals
|
|
|
31,244
|
|
|
|
35,967
|
|
|
|
15.1
|
|
Logistic services
|
|
|
1,525
|
|
|
|
1,607
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
Other products and services (3)
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
|
935
|
|
|
|
170.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross revenues
|
|
|
33,115
|
|
|
|
38,509
|
|
|
|
16.3
|
|
Value-added tax
|
|
|
(873
|
)
|
|
|
(1,083
|
)
|
|
|
24.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating revenues
|
|
US$
|
32,242
|
|
|
US$
|
37,426
|
|
|
|
16.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes copper, precious metals,
cobalt and other by-products produced by Vale Inco.
|
(2)
|
|
Does not include copper produced by
Vale Inco.
|
(3)
|
|
Includes coal.
|
Iron ore. Gross revenues from iron ore
increased by 49.3% due primarily to higher prices. The increase
in average selling prices resulted mostly from a 65.0% increase
in 2008 reference prices for iron ore fines, effective as of
April 2008 for the majority of our customers. Sales volume
increased slightly
year-on-year.
In the fourth quarter of 2008, our sales volume decreased by
37.9% compared to third quarter 2008, due to the impact of the
global macroeconomic conditions.
Iron ore pellets. Gross revenues from iron ore
pellets increased by 57.1% due to 67.6% higher average sales
prices, which more than offset a 4.3% reduction in sales volume.
The higher realized prices resulted from an 86.7% increase in
2008 reference prices for blast furnace and direct reduction
pellets. However, fourth quarter sales volume decreased by 20.9%
compared to third quarter 2008, due to lower global demand for
iron ore pellets.
Manganese ore. Gross revenues from manganese
ore increased by 245.5% due primarily to higher prices. However,
the deterioration of market conditions in the fourth quarter of
2008 had a negative impact on volumes sold, which decreased by
75.7% compared to the third quarter of 2008.
Ferroalloys. Gross revenues from ferroalloys
increased by 70.3% due to a substantial increase in average
selling prices, which was partially offset by an 18.9% decrease
in volume sold. The decline in volume is primarily attributable
to the shut-down of our ferroalloy operations in Dunkerque,
France, since August 2008 due to problems with the electric
furnace. During the fourth quarter of 2008, sales volume
decreased by 44.2% compared to the third quarter of 2008, as a
result of a decline in demand.
85
Nickel and other products. Gross revenues from
this segment decreased by 33.6%, mainly due to the following
factors.
|
|
|
|
|
Gross revenues from nickel sales decreased 40.6%, from
US$10.043 billion in 2007 to US$5.970 billion in 2008,
due to a 42.1% decline in average nickel prices. In the fourth
quarter of 2008, the average nickel sales price declined by
39.4% compared to third quarter 2008. Nickel sales volume in the
fourth quarter of 2008 remained in line with volumes sold in the
third quarter of 2008.
|
|
|
|
Gross revenues from copper sales decreased by 4.0%, from
US$1.183 billion in 2007 to US$1.136 billion in 2008,
due to a 4.2% drop in the average sales price. In the fourth
quarter of 2008, the average copper sales price declined by
54.2% compared to the third quarter of 2008. Copper sales volume
in the fourth quarter of 2008 remained in line with volumes sold
in the third quarter of 2008.
|
|
|
|
Gross revenues from sales of precious metals and other products
increased 19.9%, from US$427 million in 2007 to
US$512 million in 2008.
|
Potash. Gross revenues from sales of potash
increased by 65.7%. The increase was due to a 123.9% increase in
average selling prices, which was partially offset by a 26.0%
decline in sales volume compared to the prior year. Volumes sold
in the fourth quarter of 2008 were 73.0% lower than in the third
quarter of 2008, as a result of the weak performance of the
Brazilian agricultural sector and the accumulation of large
inventories by farmers in anticipation of higher fertilizer
prices.
Kaolin. Gross revenues from sales of kaolin
decreased by 12.2%, due principally to an 11.4% decrease in
volume.
Copper concentrate. Gross revenues from sales
of copper concentrate increased by 11.3% due to an 8.1% increase
in sales volumes and a 3.0% increase in the average sales price.
Aluminum. Gross revenues from our aluminum
business increased by 11.8%. This increase is attributable to
the following factors.
|
|
|
|
|
Gross revenues from sales of aluminum decreased 1.6%, from
US$1.570 billion in 2007 to US$1.545 billion in 2008,
due to lower volume sold. Since there is a one-month lag between
aluminum market prices and sales prices, our average aluminum
sales price in the fourth quarter of 2008 did not fully reflect
the drop in aluminum market prices.
|
|
|
|
Gross revenues from sales of alumina increased 33.4%, from
US$1.470 billion in 2008 compared to US$1.102 billion
in 2007, due to higher volumes sold in connection with the
Alunorte expansion.
|
|
|
|
Gross revenues from sales of bauxite decreased 44.9%, from
US$49 million in 2007 to US$27 million in 2008, due to
a reduction in sales volume caused by increased usage of bauxite
at our alumina refinery.
|
Logistics services. Gross revenues from
logistics services increased by 5.4%. The increase reflects
higher prices caused by the increase in fuel costs and changes
in the mix of cargo, which more than offset the slight reduction
in volume of freight cargo.
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from railroad transportation increased by 6.8%, from
US$1.220 billion in 2007 to US$1.303 billion in 2008.
Average prices increased by 13.0%, and volume shipped decreased
by 5.5%. The decline in volumes of general cargo resulted from
the reduction in transportation of agricultural products, mainly
grains, as a consequence of weaker Brazilian exports during
2008.
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
The reduction of Brazilian steel output and pig iron exports in
the fourth quarter of 2008 also contributed to reduced levels of
activity in our logistics business.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from port operations increased by 13.9%, from
US$267 million in 2007 to US$304 million in 2008.
|
|
|
|
We had no revenues from shipping in 2008, compared to
US$38 million in 2007, due to the sale of our controlling
interest in Log-In in 2007 as a result of which Log-In is no
longer consolidated in our results.
|
Other products and services. Gross revenues
from other products and services increased from
US$346 million in 2007 to US$935 million in 2008,
primarily reflecting increased sales of coal. Revenues from
sales of metallurgical coal were US$457 million in 2008,
compared to US$128 million in 2007. Revenues from sales of
thermal coal were US$120 million in 2008, compared to
US$32 million in 2007. Increased coal sales were driven by
two factors: (i) a full year of consolidation of Vale
Australia in 2008, compared to eight months of consolidation in
2007; and (ii) the increase in average coal prices in 2008
compared to 2007.
Operating
costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
% change
|
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of ores and metals
|
|
US$
|
13,628
|
|
|
US$
|
14,055
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
Cost of logistic services
|
|
|
853
|
|
|
|
930
|
|
|
|
9.0
|
|
Cost of aluminum products
|
|
|
1,705
|
|
|
|
2,267
|
|
|
|
33.0
|
|
Others
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
389
|
|
|
|
40.4
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
16,463
|
|
|
|
17,641
|
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
1,245
|
|
|
|
1,748
|
|
|
|
40.4
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
733
|
|
|
|
1,085
|
|
|
|
48.0
|
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
950
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other costs and expenses
|
|
|
607
|
|
|
|
1,254
|
|
|
|
106.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses
|
|
US$
|
19,048
|
|
|
US$
|
22,678
|
|
|
|
19.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87
Cost
of goods sold
The following table summarizes the components of our cost of
goods sold for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
% change
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
|
|
Outsourced services
|
|
|
US$ 2,628
|
|
|
|
US$ 2,880
|
|
|
|
9
|
.6%
|
Materials costs
|
|
|
2,313
|
|
|
|
2,900
|
|
|
|
25
|
.4
|
Energy:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel
|
|
|
1,406
|
|
|
|
1,842
|
|
|
|
31
|
.0
|
Electric energy
|
|
|
878
|
|
|
|
1,078
|
|
|
|
22
|
.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
2,284
|
|
|
|
2,920
|
|
|
|
27
|
.8
|
Acquisition of iron ore and pellets
|
|
|
976
|
|
|
|
1,179
|
|
|
|
20
|
.8
|
Acquisition of other products:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nickel
|
|
|
1,522
|
|
|
|
687
|
|
|
|
(54
|
.9)
|
Aluminum
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
317
|
|
|
|
10
|
.1
|
Other
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
(64
|
.0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
2,872
|
|
|
|
2,214
|
|
|
|
(22
|
.9)
|
Personnel
|
|
|
1,873
|
|
|
|
2,139
|
|
|
|
14
|
.2
|
Depreciation and depletion
|
|
|
2,049
|
|
|
|
2,664
|
|
|
|
30
|
.0
|
Inventory adjustment
|
|
|
1,062
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Others
|
|
|
1,382
|
|
|
|
1,924
|
|
|
|
39
|
.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
US$ 16,463
|
|
|
|
US$ 17,641
|
|
|
|
7
|
.2%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our total cost of goods sold increased 7.2% from 2007 to 2008.
This increase resulted primarily from the factors described
below.
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation of the U.S. dollar. Given most of our
costs and expenses are denominated in currencies other than the
U.S. dollar, the depreciation of the U.S. dollar
during 2008 led to higher costs in 2008. COGS currency exposure
in 2008 was made up as follows: 62% in Brazilian reais,
20% in Canadian dollars, 14% in U.S. dollars, 2% in
Indonesian rupiah and 2% in other currencies.
|
|
|
|
Outsourced services. Outsourced services costs increased
by 9.6% in 2008 due to higher sales volumes, the depreciation of
the U.S. dollar against the real, higher prices of
services and maintenance costs. During the fourth quarter, lower
sales volumes and the appreciation of the U.S. dollar
contributed to reduce costs by 28.6% against the third quarter
of 2008.
|
|
|
|
Material costs. Material costs increased by 25.4% in
2008, primarily reflecting higher sales volumes and higher costs
for the maintenance of equipment. In the fourth quarter of 2008,
material costs dropped 24.8% compared to the third quarter of
2008, due to an overall reduction in volumes and the average
U.S. dollar appreciation against the real.
|
|
|
|
Energy costs. Energy costs increased by 27.8% in 2008.
This increase primarily reflected higher energy prices, higher
consumption due to the leasing of the pelletizing operations
from our joint ventures, and the depreciation of the
U.S. dollar. In the fourth quarter, the overall reduction
in volumes and the average U.S. dollar appreciation against
the real led to a 31.2% reduction compared to the third
quarter of 2008.
|
|
|
|
Personnel costs. Personnel costs increased by 14.2%,
mainly reflecting the depreciation of the U.S. dollar
against the real and the impact of wage increases
pursuant to a two-year agreement with our Brazilian employees
entered into in November 2007. During the fourth quarter, the
overall
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
reduction in volumes and the appreciation of the
U.S. dollar against the real contributed to a 12.9%
decline in costs compared to the third quarter of 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of iron ore and iron ore pellets. The cost of
iron ore and iron ore pellets purchased from third parties
increased 20.8%, mainly due to higher benchmark prices. We
purchased 11.9 million metric tons of iron ore from third
parties in 2008 compared to 8.3 million metric tons in
2007, a 43.4% increase. This was partly offset by a decrease in
the volume of pellets purchased from third parties, from
11.7 million metric tons in 2007 to 5.9 million metric
tons in 2008, as a result of the leasing of the pellet plants
from our joint ventures.
|
|
|
|
Other costs. The increase of US$542 million was
mainly due to the operating lease agreements signed during 2008
with our joint ventures Nibrasco, Itabrasco and Kobrasco, under
which we leased four pellet plants for a period from five to
30 years.
|
The increase in total cost of goods sold was partially offset by
the following factors.
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of products, which includes nickel concentrates for
processing under tolling contracts, intermediary products and
finished nickel, totaled US$2,214 million in 2008 compared
to US$2,872 million in 2007, as a result of lower prices
and volumes.
|
|
|
|
We recognized additional cost of goods sold in 2007, in the
amount of US$1.062 billion, because of the adjustment of
inventory resulting from the acquisition of Vale Inco.
|
|
|
|
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by 40.4%,
or US$503 million. The increase was mainly attributable to
an adjustment related to copper sales and to higher expenses
related to global integration of IT infrastructure advertising
and brand management. The adjustment for copper sales arose from
the effects of sharply declining copper prices under the MAMA
pricing system. In the fourth quarter of 2008, copper prices
declined 48.8% compared to the third quarter of 2008, causing
final prices for copper sales be much lower than the previously
set provisional prices. The difference was accounted for as an
adjustment of US$316 million.
|
|
|
Research
and development expenses
|
Research and development expenses increased by 48.0%. The
US$352 million increase primarily reflects an increase in
mineral exploration and project studies in several regions,
including South America, Asia, Africa and Australia.
In 2008, we recognized a US$950 million impairment of the
goodwill associated with our 2006 acquisition of Vale Inco, of
which US$1.336 billion remained at December 31, 2008.
For a full description of the impairment test, see Note 13
of our financial statements herein.
Other costs and expenses increased by US$647 million as a
consequence of non-recurring events, as follows:
US$204 million due to an additional payment related to tax
assessments on third-party railroad transportation services by
our iron ore operations in previous years, US$199 million
relating to provision for loss on materials and
US$77 million of market value assessment of nickel
inventories.
89
Operating
income by segment
The following table provides information concerning our
operating income by segment and as a percentage of revenues for
the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Segment operating income (loss)
|
|
|
Segment operating income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(% of net operating
|
|
|
|
|
|
(% of net operating
|
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
revenues)
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
revenues)
|
|
|
Ferrous minerals:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iron ore
|
|
US$
|
6,325
|
|
|
|
54.4
|
%
|
|
US$
|
9,988
|
|
|
|
57.4
|
%
|
Pellets
|
|
|
659
|
|
|
|
25.3
|
|
|
|
1,606
|
|
|
|
39.1
|
|
Manganese ore
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
67.3
|
|
Ferroalloys
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
28.0
|
|
|
|
604
|
|
|
|
55.8
|
|
Pig iron
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
23.5
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
52.1
|
|
Non-ferrous minerals:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nickel and other products
|
|
|
4,785
|
|
|
|
40.6
|
|
|
|
1,131
|
|
|
|
14.4
|
|
Potash
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
22.0
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
50.2
|
|
Kaolin
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Copper concentrate
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
32.6
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
12.7
|
|
Aluminum products
|
|
|
828
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
|
|
516
|
|
|
|
17.3
|
|
Logistics services:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Railroads
|
|
|
297
|
|
|
|
29.1
|
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
22.4
|
|
Ports
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
15.5
|
|
Ships
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Others
|
|
|
(159
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
18.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
US$
|
13,194
|
|
|
|
40.9
|
%
|
|
US$
|
14,748
|
|
|
|
39.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our operating income decreased as a percentage of net operating
revenues, from 40.9% in 2007 to 39.4% in 2008, due to the
impairment charge in the nickel segment. In the fourth quarter
of 2008, operating margin was 14.7%, compared to 47.2% in the
third quarter of 2008, due to lower shipment volumes and prices.
Our ferrous minerals business was responsible for 93.6% of our
cash generation in the fourth quarter of 2008, compared to 79.9%
in the third quarter.
|
|
|
|
|
This comparison reflects the effect of margin reductions in
nickel, copper concentrate, aluminum products and railroads,
counterbalanced by higher margins in iron ore, iron ore pellets,
manganese ore, ferroalloys, potash and ports.
|
|
|
|
The increase in operating margin for iron ore and iron ore
pellets primarily reflects higher average selling prices, which
were partially offset by (i) the impact of the appreciation
of the real against the U.S. dollar on our operating
costs and expenses and (ii) higher research and development
expenditures.
|
|
|
|
The significant increase in operating margins for manganese and
ferroalloys is attributable to higher prices, reflecting market
tightness during most of 2008.
|
|
|
|
The increase in operating margin for potash is attributable to
higher prices, which offset the decrease in volumes during the
fourth quarter of the year.
|
|
|
|
The decrease in operating margin for nickel and other products
primarily reflects (i) the decline in average selling
prices and (ii) the goodwill impairment in 2008.
|
|
|
|
The margin declines in the aluminum products segment resulted
primarily from higher energy costs and higher freight costs. The
higher freight costs are due to an increase in the volume of
bauxite transported from the Trombetas bauxite mine, which
belongs to MRN.
|
90
Non-operating
income (expenses)
The following table details our net non-operating income
(expenses) for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
Financial income
|
|
US$
|
295
|
|
|
US$
|
602
|
|
Financial expenses
|
|
|
(2,517
|
)
|
|
|
(1,765
|
)
|
Gains (losses) on derivatives, net
|
|
|
931
|
|
|
|
(812
|
)
|
Foreign exchange and monetary gains, net
|
|
|
2,553
|
|
|
|
364
|
|
Gain on sale of investments
|
|
|
777
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-operating income (expenses)
|
|
US$
|
2,039
|
|
|
US$
|
(1,531
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We had net non-operating expenses of US$1.531 billion in
2008, compared to net non-operating revenues of
US$2.039 billion in 2007. This change primarily reflects
the following factors.
|
|
|
|
|
An increase in financial income, principally due to higher
average cash balances, resulting from our global equity offer.
|
|
|
|
A decrease in financial expenses, mainly due to lower average
total debt.
|
|
|
|
A US$812 million loss in 2008, compared to a
US$931 million gain in 2007, principally related to a swap
of real-denominated debt into U.S. dollars. The
transaction generated a gain of US$791 million in 2007 and
a loss of US$833 million in 2008 due to the exchange rate
variation.
|
|
|
|
Lower foreign exchange gains due to the depreciation of the
U.S. dollar. Despite the appreciation of the
U.S. dollar against our functional currency, the
real, in the second half of the year, the larger average
cash holdings in U.S. dollar softened the negative effect
of the foreign exchange variation in our
U.S. dollar-denominated liabilities.
|
|
|
|
A US$80 million gain on sales of investments in 2008 from
the sale of our interest in Jubilee Mines, compared to a
US$777 million gain in 2007 from our sales of interests in
Usiminas (US$456 million gain), Log-In (US$238 million
gain) and Lion Ore Mining (US$80 million gain).
|
Income
taxes
For 2008, we recorded net income tax expense of
US$535 million, compared to US$3.201 billion in 2007.
Our effective tax rate has historically been lower than the
Brazilian statutory rate because: (i) income of some
non-Brazilian subsidiaries is subject to lower rates of tax;
(ii) we are entitled under Brazilian law to deduct the
amount of our distributions to shareholders that we classify as
interest on shareholders equity; and (iii) we benefit
from tax incentives applicable to our earnings on production in
certain regions of Brazil. As a result, the effective tax rate
on our pretax income was 4.0% in 2008 and 21% in 2007. The
accounting effects of foreign exchange variation, which are not
taxable, also contributed to lower net income tax expense in
2008.
Affiliates
and joint ventures
Our equity in the results of affiliates and joint ventures
resulted in a gain of US$794 million in 2008, compared to a
gain of US$595 million in 2007. The increase was primarily
due to higher net income at our investee Samarco, where a new
plant began operations in 2008. Note 12 to our financial
statements herein summarizes our equity in the results of
affiliates and joint ventures.
91
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Overview
In the ordinary course of business, our principal funding
requirements are for capital expenditures, dividend payments and
debt service. We have historically met these requirements by
using cash generated from operating activities and through
borrowings. In 2009, we issued US$2.0 billion in bonds and
US$942 million in mandatorily convertible notes. For 2010,
we have budgeted capital expenditures of US$12.9 billion,
and announced a minimum dividend payment of US$2.5 billion
and the acquisition for US$5.65 billion of BPI and
Fosfertil. We expect our operating cash flow and cash holdings
to be sufficient to meet these anticipated requirements. We also
regularly review acquisition and investment opportunities, and
when suitable opportunities arise we make acquisitions and
investments to implement our business strategy. We may fund
these investments with internally generated funds or with
borrowings, supplemented in some cases by dispositions of assets.
Sources
of funds
Our principal sources of funds are operating cash flow and
borrowings. Our operating activities generated cash flows of
US$7.1 billion in 2009.
We completed two debt offerings and an offering of mandatorily
convertible notes in 2009. In November 2009, our wholly owned
finance subsidiary Vale Overseas issued US$1 billion of
30-year
notes guaranteed by Vale. These notes bear interest at 6.875%.
In September 2009, Vale Overseas also issued US$1 billion
of 10-year
notes guaranteed by Vale. These notes bear interest at 5.625%
per annum. In July 2009, our wholly owned finance subsidiary
Vale Capital II issued US$942 million of notes due
2012 that are mandatorily convertible into American depositary
shares of Vale. These notes bear interest at 6.75% per annum,
and we will pay additional remuneration based on the net amount
of cash distributions paid to ADS holders.
During 2008, we signed framework agreements with the Japan Bank
for International Cooperation (JBIC) and Nippon
Export and Investment Insurance (NEXI) for the
financing of mining, logistics and power generation projects. In
November 2009, we entered into a US$300 million export
facility agreement with Japanese financial institutions to
finance the construction of the Karebbe hydroelectric power
plant on the Larona River in Sulawesi, Indonesia. As of
December 31, 2009, we had drawn US$150 million under
this facility.
In 2008, we established a credit line for R$7.3 billion, or
US$4.3 billion, with Banco Nacional de Desenvolvimento
Econômico e Social BNDES (the Brazilian
National Development Bank) to help finance our investment
program. As of December 31, 2009, we had drawn the
equivalent of US$892 million under this facility.
We also have revolving credit facilities. At December 31,
2009, the total amount available under these facilities was
US$1.9 billion, of which US$1.150 billion was granted
to Vale International and the remaining balance to our wholly
owned subsidiary Vale Inco. As of December 31, 2009,
neither Vale International nor Vale Inco had drawn any amounts
under these facilities, but US$115 million of letters of
credit were issued and outstanding pursuant to Vale Incos
facility.
On March 17, 2010 we issued 750 million notes,
equivalent to US$1.030 billion, due 2018 with a coupon of
4.375% per year, payable annually.
92
Uses of
funds
Capital expenditures
Capital expenditures amounted to US$9.013 billion in 2009,
and we have budgeted US$12.9 billion for 2010. Our actual
capital expenditures may differ from the budgeted amount for a
variety of reasons, including unexpected changes in currency
prices. These capital expenditure figures include some amounts
that are treated as current expenses for accounting purposes,
such as expenses for project development, maintenance of
existing assets, and research and development. For more
information about the specific projects for which we have
budgeted funds, see our report on
Form 6-K
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission on
November 3, 2009.
Distributions
We paid total dividends of US$2.724 billion in 2009
(including distributions classified for tax purposes as interest
on shareholders equity). The minimum dividend announced
for 2010 is US$2.5 billion. The first installment of this
dividend, in the amount of US$1.250 billion, will be paid
on April 30, 2010.
Debt
At December 31, 2009, we had aggregate outstanding debt of
US$22.880 billion. Our outstanding long-term debt
(including the current portion of long-term debt and accrued
charges) was US$22.831 billion, compared with
US$18.168 billion at the end of 2008. At December 31,
2009, US$719 million of our debt was secured by liens on
some of our assets. At December 31, 2009, the average debt
maturity was 9.17 years, compared to 9.28 years in
2008.
We are currently rated BBB+ (Standard & Poors),
Baa2 (Moodys), BBB high (Dominion) and BBB (Fitch).
Ratings are not a recommendation to purchase, hold or sell
notes, as ratings do not comment as to market price or
suitability for a particular investor. The ratings are based
upon current information furnished to the rating agencies by
Vale and information obtained by the rating agencies from other
sources. The ratings are only accurate as of the date thereof
and may be changed, superseded or withdrawn as a result of
changes in, or unavailability of, such information, and
therefore a prospective purchaser should check the current
ratings before purchasing notes. Each rating should be evaluated
independently of any other rating.
In general, our short-term debt consists primarily of
U.S. dollar-denominated trade financing, mainly in the form
of export prepayments and export sales advances with financial
institutions. At December 31, 2009, we had
US$30 million of outstanding short-term debt and
US$19 million of loans from related parties.
Our major categories of long-term indebtedness are as follows.
The amounts given below include the current portion of long-term
debt and exclude accrued charges.
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollar-denominated loans and financing
(US$5.875 billion at December 31,
2009). These loans include export financing
lines, import finance from export credit agencies, and loans
from commercial banks and multilateral organizations. The
largest facility is a pre-export financing facility, linked to
future receivables from export sales, that was originally
entered into in the amount of US$6.0 billion as part of the
refinancing of the acquisition debt for Vale Inco. The
outstanding amount at December 31, 2009 was
US$3.9 billion.
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollar-denominated fixed rate notes
(US$8.481 billion at December 31,
2009). We, through our finance subsidiary Vale
Overseas Limited, have issued in public offerings fixed-rate
debt securities guaranteed by Vale. The amount of these
securities outstanding at December 31, 2009 was
US$7.381 billion. Our subsidiary Vale Inco has issued fixed
rate debt in the amount of US$1.100 billion.
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollar-denominated loans secured by export
receivables (US$150 million at December 31,
2009). We had a US$400 million
securitization program based on existing and future receivables
generated by our subsidiary CVRD Finance from exports of iron
ore and iron ore pellets to customers in Europe, Asia and the
United States. On January 15, 2010 we redeemed all
outstanding export receivables securitization notes.
|
|
|
|
Real-denominated non-convertible debentures
(US$3.453 billion at December 31,
2009). In November 2006, we issued
US$2.6 billion of non-convertible debentures with four- and
seven-year maturities. The first series, representing
US$700 million at issuance, matures in 2010 and bears
interest at 101.75% of the accumulated variation of the
Brazilian CDI (interbank certificate of deposit) interest rate.
The second series, representing US$1.9 billion at issuance,
matures in 2013 and bears interest at the Brazilian CDI interest
rate plus 0.25% per year. At December 31, 2009, the total
outstanding amount of these two series was US$3.159 billion.
|
|
|
|
Perpetual notes (US$78 million at December 31,
2009). We have issued perpetual notes that are
exchangeable for 48 billion preferred shares of our
subsidiary Mineração Rio do Norte S.A. Interest is
payable on the notes in an amount equal to dividends paid on the
underlying preferred shares.
|
|
|
|
Other debt (US$4.507 billion at December 31,
2009). We have outstanding debt, principally owed
to BNDES and Brazilian commercial banks denominated in Brazilian
reais, and loans and financing in currencies other than
U.S. dollars and reais.
|
Some of our long-term debt instruments contain financial
covenants. Our principal covenants require us to maintain
certain ratios, such as debt to equity, debt to EBITDA and
interest coverage. We believe that our existing covenants will
not significantly restrict our ability to borrow additional
funds as needed to meet our capital requirements.
SHAREHOLDER
DEBENTURES
At the time of the first stage of our privatization in 1997, we
issued shareholder revenue interests known in Brazil as
debentures participativas to our
then-existing shareholders. The terms of the debentures were
established to ensure that our pre-privatization shareholders,
including the Brazilian government, would participate alongside
us in potential future financial benefits that we derive from
exploiting certain mineral resources that were not taken into
account in determining the minimum purchase price of our shares
in the privatization. In accordance with the debentures deed,
holders have the right to receive semi-annual payments equal to
an agreed percentage of our net revenues (revenues less
value-added tax, transport fee and insurance expenses related to
the trading of the products) from certain identified mineral
resources that we owned at the time of the privatization, to the
extent that we exceed defined thresholds of sales volume
relating to certain mineral resources, and from the sale of
mineral rights that we owned at that time. Our obligation to
make payments to the holders will cease when the relevant
mineral resources are exhausted.
Total payments made under the shareholder debentures amounted to
US$11 million in 2007, US$11 million in 2008 and
US$7 million in 2009. In April 2010, we paid semi-annual
remuneration of US$5 million. See Note 20 to our
consolidated financial statements for a description of the terms
of the debentures.
94
CONTRACTUAL
OBLIGATIONS
The following table summarizes our long-term debt, short-term
debt, operating lease obligations, purchase obligations and
take-or-pay
obligations of our subsidiary Alunorte at December 31,
2009. This table excludes other common non-contractual
obligations that we may have, including pension obligations,
deferred tax liabilities and contingent obligations arising from
uncertain tax positions, all of which are discussed in the notes
to our consolidated financial statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments due by period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 year
|
|
|
2011-2012
|
|
|
2013-2014
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
Long-term debt(1)
|
|
US$
|
22,545
|
|
|
US$
|
2,646
|
|
|
US$
|
3,832
|
|
|
US$
|
4,176
|
|
|
US$
|
11,891
|
|
Short-term debt
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Interest payments(2)
|
|
|
15,184
|
|
|
|
1,212
|
|
|
|
2,541
|
|
|
|
2,216
|
|
|
|
9,215
|
|
Operating lease obligations(3)
|
|
|
3,107
|
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
388
|
|
|
|
388
|
|
|
|
2,137
|
|
Purchase obligations(4)
|
|
|
12,589
|
|
|
|
3,764
|
|
|
|
2,819
|
|
|
|
1,349
|
|
|
|
4,657
|
|
Take-or-pay
obligation (Alunorte)(5)
|
|
|
874
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
335
|
|
|
|
344
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
US$
|
54,329
|
|
|
US$
|
8,041
|
|
|
US$
|
9,915
|
|
|
US$
|
8,473
|
|
|
US$
|
27,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Amounts include the current portion
of long-term debt and do not include accrued charges.
|
(2)
|
|
Consists of estimated future
payments of interest on our loans, financings and debentures,
calculated based on interest rates and foreign exchange rates
applicable at December 31, 2009 and assuming (i) that
all amortization payments and payments at maturity on our loans,
financings and debentures will be made on their scheduled
payments dates, and (ii) that our perpetual bonds are
redeemed on the first permitted redemption date.
|
(3)
|
|
Amounts include fixed payments
related to the operating lease contracts for the pellet plants.
|
(4)
|
|
Obligations to purchase materials.
Amounts are based on contracted prices, except for purchases of
iron ore from mining companies located in Brazil, which are
based on 2009 average prices.
|
(5)
|
|
Our subsidiary Alunorte is
committed under a
take-or-pay
agreement to purchase bauxite from MRN at a price that is
determined by a formula based on prevailing world prices of
aluminum. The values in the table are based on year-end 2009
aluminum prices.
|
OFF-BALANCE
SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
At December 31, 2009, we did not have any off-balance sheet
arrangements as defined in the SECs
Form 20-F.
For information on our contingent liabilities see Note 20
to our consolidated financial statements.
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
We believe that the following are our critical accounting
policies. We consider an accounting policy to be critical if it
is important to our financial condition and results of
operations and if it requires significant judgments and
estimates on the part of our management. For a summary of all of
our significant accounting policies, see Note 3 to our
consolidated financial statements.
Mineral
reserves and useful life of mines
We regularly evaluate and update our estimates of proven and
probable mineral reserves. Our proven and probable mineral
reserves are determined using generally accepted estimation
techniques. Calculating our reserves requires us to make
assumptions about future conditions that are highly uncertain,
including future ore prices, currency prices, inflation rates,
mining technology, availability of permits and production costs.
Changes in some or all of these assumptions could have a
significant impact on our recorded proven and probable reserves.
95
One of the ways we make our ore reserve estimates is to
determine the mine closure dates used in recording the fair
value of our asset retirement obligations for environmental and
site reclamation costs and the periods over which we amortize
our mining assets. Any change in our estimates of total expected
future mine or asset lives could have an impact on the
depreciation, depletion and amortization charges recorded in our
consolidated financial statements under cost of goods sold.
Changes in the estimated lives of our mines could also
significantly impact our estimates of environmental and site
reclamation costs, which are described in greater detail below.
Environmental
and site reclamation costs
Expenditures relating to ongoing compliance with environmental
regulations are charged against earnings or capitalized as
appropriate. These ongoing programs are designed to minimize the
environmental impact of our activities.
We recognize a liability for the fair value of our estimated
asset retirement obligations in the period in which they are
incurred, if a reasonable estimate can be made. We consider the
accounting estimates related to reclamation and closure costs to
be critical accounting estimates because:
|
|
|
|
|
we will not incur most of these costs for a number of years,
requiring us to make estimates over a long period;
|
|
|
|
reclamation and closure laws and regulations could change in the
future or circumstances affecting our operations could change,
either of which could result in significant changes to our
current plans;
|
|
|
|
calculating the fair value of our asset retirement obligations
requires us to assign probabilities to projected cash flows, to
make long-term assumptions about inflation rates, to determine
our credit-adjusted risk-free interest rates and to determine
market risk premiums that are appropriate for our operations; and
|
|
|
|
given the significance of these factors in the determination of
our estimated environmental and site reclamation costs, changes
in any or all of these estimates could have a material impact on
net income. In particular, given the long periods over which
many of these charges are discounted to present value, changes
in our assumptions about credit-adjusted risk-free interest
rates could have a significant impact on the size of our
provision.
|
Our Environmental Department defines the rules and procedures
that should be used to evaluate our asset retirement
obligations. The future costs of retirement of all of our mines
and sites are reviewed annually, considering the actual stage of
exhaustion and the projected exhaustion date of each mine and
site. The future estimated retirement costs are discounted to
present value using a credit-adjusted risk-free interest rate.
At December 31, 2009, we estimated the fair value of our
aggregate total asset retirement obligations to be
US$1.116 billion.
Impairment
of long-lived assets and goodwill
We have made acquisitions that included a significant amount of
goodwill, as well as intangible and tangible assets. Under
generally accepted accounting principles, except for goodwill
and indefinite-life intangible assets, all long-lived assets,
including these acquired assets, are amortized over their
estimated useful lives, and are tested to determine if they are
recoverable from operating earnings on an undiscounted
96
cash flow basis over their useful lives whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may
not be recoverable. Factors that could trigger an impairment
review include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
significant underperformance relating to expected historical or
projected future operating results of entities or business units;
|
|
|
|
significant changes in the manner in which we use the acquired
assets or our overall business strategy; or
|
|
|
|
significant negative industry or economic trends.
|
When we determine that the carrying value of definite-life
intangible assets and long-lived assets may not be recoverable
based upon verification of one or more of the above indicators
of impairment, we measure any impairment loss based on a
projected discounted cash flow method using a discount rate
determined by our management to be commensurate with the risk
inherent in our current business model.
We are required to assign goodwill to reporting units and to
test each reporting units goodwill for impairment at least
annually and whenever circumstances indicating that recognized
goodwill might not be fully recovered are identified. In the
first step of a goodwill impairment test, we compare a reporting
units fair value with its carrying amount to identify any
potential goodwill impairment loss. If the carrying amount of a
reporting unit exceeds the units fair value, we must carry
out the second step of the impairment test to measure the
amount, if any, of the units goodwill impairment loss.
Goodwill arising from a business combination with a continuing
non-controlling interest must be tested for impairment by using
an approach that is consistent with the approach that the entity
used to measure the non-controlling interest at the acquisition
date. For equity investees we determine annually whether there
is an
other-than-temporary
decline in the fair value of the investment.
Following the downturn in the economy, which contributed to the
decline in the prices of certain commodities produced by us
during the last quarter of 2008 we determined that the goodwill
associated with the acquisition of Vale Inco, included within
the reportable segment Non-ferrous
nickel, was partially impaired at
December 31, 2008. The impairment charge recorded in
operating results in the fourth quarter of 2008 was
US$950 million. We did not recognize any impairments in
2009.
For impairment test purposes, management determined discounted
cash flows based on approved budget assumptions. Gross margin
projections were based on past performance and managements
expectations of market developments. Information about sales
prices is consistent with the forecasts included in industry
reports, taking into account quoted prices when available and
appropriate. The discount rates used reflect specific risks
relating to the relevant assets in each reporting unit,
depending on their composition and location.
Recognition of additional goodwill impairment charges in the
future would depend on several estimates, including market
conditions, recent actual results and managements
forecasts. This information will be obtained when our assessment
is updated during the fourth quarter of 2010, or earlier if
impairment indicators are identified. It is not possible at this
time to determine whether an impairment charge will be taken in
the future and if it were to be taken, whether such charge would
be material.
Derivatives
We are required to recognize all derivative financial
instruments, whether designated in hedging relationships or not,
on our balance sheet and to measure such instruments at fair
value. The gain or loss in fair value is included in current
earnings, unless the derivative to which the gain or loss is
attributable qualifies for hedge accounting. We have entered
into cash flow hedges that qualify for hedge accounting.
Unrealized fair value adjustments to cash flow hedges are
recognized in other comprehensive income. We use well-known
market participants valuation methodologies to compute the
fair value of instruments. To evaluate
97
the financial instruments, we use estimates and judgments
related to present values, taking into account market curves,
projected interest rates, exchange rates, forward market prices
and their respective volatilities, when applicable. We consider
non-performance risk on financial instruments and derivative
transactions, and we enter into such transactions with financial
institutions that we consider to have a high credit quality. The
exposure limits to financial institutions are proposed annually
by the Executive Risk Committee and approved by the Board of
Executive Officers. The financial institutions credit risk
tracking is performed making use of a credit risk valuation
methodology that considers, among other information, published
ratings provided by international rating agencies and other
management judgments. During 2009, we implemented hedge
accounting partially for an aluminum hedge and for a foreign
exchange hedge. At December 31, 2009, we had
US$2 million of unrealized gains related to derivative
instruments designated as cash flow hedges. In 2009, we recorded
to the income statement unrealized gains of
US$1.528 billion in relation to fair value adjustments on
derivative instruments.
Income
taxes
We recognize deferred tax effects of tax losses carryforward and
temporary differences in our consolidated financial statements.
We record a valuation allowance when we believe that it is more
likely than not that tax assets will not be fully recoverable in
the future.
When we prepare our consolidated financial statements, we
estimate our income taxes based on regulations in the various
jurisdictions where we conduct business. This requires us to
estimate our actual current tax exposure and to assess temporary
differences that result from deferring treatment of certain
items for tax and accounting purposes. These differences result
in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which we show on our
consolidated balance sheet. We must then assess the likelihood
that our deferred tax assets will be recovered from future
taxable income. To the extent we believe that recovery is not
likely, we establish a valuation allowance. When we establish a
valuation allowance or increase this allowance in an accounting
period, we record a tax expense in our statement of income. When
we reduce the valuation allowance, we record a tax benefit in
our statement of income.
Determining our provision for income taxes, our deferred tax
assets and liabilities and any valuation allowance to be
recorded against our net deferred tax assets requires
significant management judgment, estimates and assumptions about
matters that are highly uncertain. For each income tax asset, we
evaluate the likelihood of whether some portion or the entire
asset will not be realized. The valuation allowance made in
relation to accumulated tax losses carryforward depends on our
assessment of the probability of generation of future taxable
profits within the legal entity in which the related deferred
tax asset is recorded based on our production and sales plans,
selling prices, operating costs, environmental costs, group
restructuring plans for subsidiaries and site reclamation costs
and planned capital costs.
Contingencies
We disclose material contingent liabilities unless the
possibility of any loss arising is considered remote, and we
disclose material contingent assets where the inflow of economic
benefits is probable. We discuss our material contingencies in
Note 20 to our financial statements.
We record an estimated loss from a loss contingency when
information available prior to the issuance of our financial
statements indicates that it is probable that a future event
will confirm that an asset has been impaired or a liability has
been incurred at the date of the financial statements, and the
amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. In particular,
given the nature of Brazilian tax legislation, the assessment of
potential tax liabilities requires significant management
judgment. By their nature, contingencies will only be resolved
when one or more future events occurs or fails to occur, and
typically those events will occur a number of years in the
future. Assessing such liabilities, particularly in the
Brazilian legal environment, inherently involves the exercise of
significant management judgment and estimates of the outcome of
future events.
98
The provision for contingencies at December 31, 2009,
totaling US$1.763 billion, consists of provisions of
US$657 million for labor, US$582 million for civil,
US$489 million for tax and US$35 million for other
claims.
Employee
post-retirement benefits
We sponsor defined benefit pension plans covering some of our
employees. The determination of the amount of our obligations
for pension benefits depends on certain actuarial assumptions.
These assumptions are described in Note 18 to our
consolidated financial statements and include, among others, the
expected long-term rate of return on plan assets and increases
in salaries. In accordance with U.S. GAAP, actual results
that differ from our assumptions and are not a component of net
benefit costs for the year are recorded in other comprehensive
income (loss).
RISK
MANAGEMENT
The aim of our risk management strategy is to promote
enterprise-wide risk management, through an integrated framework
that considers the impact on our business of not only market
risk factors (market risk), but also risks arising from third
party obligations (credit risk) and risks inherent in our
operational processes (operational risk). In furtherance of this
objective, our Board of Directors has established an
enterprise-wide risk management policy and a risk management
committee.
Our risk management policy requires that we regularly evaluate
the risk to our cash flow, as well as mitigation strategies. The
Board of Executive Officers is responsible for the evaluation
and approval of long-term risk mitigation strategies recommended
by the risk management committee. The committee is responsible
for overseeing and reviewing our risk management principles and
risk management instruments, in addition to reporting
periodically to the Board of Executive Officers regarding major
risks and exposures and their impact on our cash flow. As of
April 2010, the members of the risk management committee were:
Fabio de Oliveira Barbosa, Chief Financial Officer, Tito
Martins, Executive Officer for Non-Ferrous Minerals, Guilherme
Cavalcanti, Corporate Finance Director, and Jennifer Maki, Vale
Inco Chief Financial Officer.
In addition to our risk management governance model, we also
rely on our corporate structure with its well-defined roles and
responsibilities. The recommendation and execution of derivative
transactions are implemented by different and independent areas.
The strategy and risk management department is responsible for
defining and proposing to the risk management committee, risk
mitigation strategies consistent with our corporate strategy.
The finance department is responsible for the execution of risk
mitigation strategies through the use of derivatives. The
independence of these departments promotes an effective control
over these operations.
Market
risk
The consolidated market risk exposure and portfolio of
derivatives are measured monthly and monitored in order to
evaluate the financial results and the possible risk impacts on
our cash flows, measured against the initial goals. Fair value
changes in the derivatives portfolio are monitored weekly. We
also periodically review the credit limits and creditworthiness
of our hedging counterparties.
Considering the nature of our business and operations, the
principal market risks we face are interest rates, currency
prices, product prices and input prices.
We recognize all derivatives on our balance sheet at fair value,
and the gain or loss in fair value is recognized in our current
earnings, except as described in the next paragraph. Fair value
accounting of
99
derivatives may introduce unintended volatility in our quarterly
earnings. However, it does not generate volatility in our cash
flows, given the nature of our derivatives transactions.
During 2009, we implemented hedge accounting partially for an
aluminum hedge and for a currency price hedge. Hedge accounting
modifies the usual accounting treatment of a hedging instrument
by changing the timing of recognition of gains and losses on the
hedging instrument to enable gains and losses on the hedging
instrument to be recognized in the income statement in the same
period as offsetting losses or gains on the hedged item. This
avoids much of the volatility that would arise if the derivative
gains and losses were recognized in the income statement, as
otherwise required.
The asset (liability) balances at December 31, 2009 and
2008 and the movement in fair value of derivative financial
instruments are shown in the following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
rates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(LIBOR)/
|
|
|
Aluminum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currencies
|
|
|
products
|
|
|
Copper
|
|
|
Nickel
|
|
|
Platinum
|
|
|
Gold
|
|
|
Freight
|
|
|
Gas
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Fair value at January 1, 2008
|
|
US$
|
632
|
|
|
US$
|
(98
|
)
|
|
US$
|
(188
|
)
|
|
US$
|
42
|
|
|
US$
|
(24
|
)
|
|
US$
|
(36
|
)
|
|
US$
|
0
|
|
|
US$
|
(6
|
)
|
|
US$
|
322
|
|
Financial settlement
|
|
|
(394
|
)
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) in the year
|
|
|
(686
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(811
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes
|
|
|
(123
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) at December 31, 2008
|
|
US$
|
(571
|
)
|
|
US$
|
0
|
|
|
US$
|
0
|
|
|
US$
|
32
|
|
|
US$
|
0
|
|
|
US$
|
0
|
|
|
US$
|
0
|
|
|
US$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
US$
|
(541
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value at January 1, 2009
|
|
US$
|
(571
|
)
|
|
US$
|
0
|
|
|
US$
|
0
|
|
|
US$
|
32
|
|
|
US$
|
0
|
|
|
US$
|
0
|
|
|
US$
|
0
|
|
|
US$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
US$
|
(541
|
)
|
Financial settlement
|
|
|
(241
|
)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(146
|
)
|
Unrealized gains (losses) in the year
|
|
|
1,681
|
|
|
|
(90
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(188
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
1,527
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) December 31, 2009
|
|
US$
|
870
|
|
|
US$
|
(87
|
)
|
|
US$
|
0
|
|
|
US$
|
(28
|
)
|
|
US$
|
0
|
|
|
US$
|
0
|
|
|
US$
|
29
|
|
|
US$
|
49
|
|
|
US$
|
833
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
rate and foreign exchange rate risks
Our cash flows are exposed to the volatility of several
different currencies against the U.S. dollar. While most of
our product prices, representing around 90% of total revenue,
are denominated or indexed to the U.S. dollar, most of our
costs, disbursements and investments are denominated or indexed
to currencies other than the U.S. dollar, mainly reais
and Canadian dollars.
In order to reduce potential cash flow volatility arising from
this currency mismatch, we use foreign exchange derivative
instruments. Our currency and interest rate derivative portfolio
consists basically of swaps to convert floating cash flows in
reais to fixed or floating U.S. dollar cash flows,
without any leverage.
We are also exposed to interest rate risk on loans and
financings. Our U.S. dollar-denominated floating rate debt
consists mainly of loans, including export pre-payments,
commercial bank loans and multilateral organization loans. The
U.S. dollar floating rate debt is mainly subject to changes
in LIBOR (London Interbank Offer Rate in U.S. dollars). In
order to mitigate the impact of interest rate volatility on our
cash flows, we take advantage of natural hedges resulting from
the positive correlation between metal prices and
U.S. dollar floating interest rates. Where natural hedges
are not present, we may opt to obtain the same effect using
financial instruments.
Our floating rate debt denominated in reais includes
debentures, loans obtained from BNDES and property and service
acquisition financing in the Brazilian market. Interest on these
obligations is mainly based on the CDI (Interbank Deposit
Certificate), the benchmark interest rate in the Brazilian
interbank market, and the TJLP, the benchmark Brazilian
long-term interest rate.
100
The following table sets forth our floating and fixed rate
long-term debt, categorized by Brazilian reais and other
currencies, and as a percentage of our total long-term debt
portfolio at the dates indicated, except for accrued charges and
translation adjustments, as reflected in our consolidated
financial statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(US$ million, except percentages)
|
|
Floating rate debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real-denominated
|
|
|
4,374
|
|
|
|
24.5
|
%
|
|
|
6,949
|
|
|
|
30.8
|
%
|
Denominated in other currencies
|
|
|
6,612
|
|
|
|
37.0
|
%
|
|
|
6,764
|
|
|
|
30.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
10,987
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,713
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real-denominated
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
Denominated in other currencies
|
|
|
6,868
|
|
|
|
38.5
|
%
|
|
|
8,830
|
|
|
|
39.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
17,857
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
22,544
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Accrued charges
|
|
|
311
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
18,168
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,831
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table provides information about our debt
obligations as of December 31, 2009. It presents the
principal cash flows and related weighted average interest rates
of these obligations by expected maturity date. Weighted average
variable interest rates are based on the applicable reference
rate at December 31, 2009. Actual cash flows of these debt
obligations are denominated mainly in U.S. dollars or
reais, as indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cash flow
|
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
at
|
|
|
|
interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
rate(1)(2)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
To 2037
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2009(3)
|
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
US$-denominated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonds
|
|
6.70
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
401.8
|
|
|
|
122.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,961.7
|
|
|
|
8,497.8
|
|
|
|
8,871.9
|
|
Loans
|
|
8.22
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.9
|
|
|
|
39.1
|
|
|
|
39.3
|
|
Securitization notes
|
|
5.87
|
|
|
150.0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150.0
|
|
|
|
164.9
|
|
Floating rate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
1.89
|
|
|
290.4
|
|
|
|
505.3
|
|
|
|
293.4
|
|
|
|
303.3
|
|
|
|
181.1
|
|
|
|
817.8
|
|
|
|
2,391.3
|
|
|
|
2,591.5
|
|
Trade finance
|
|
1.57
|
|
|
1,250.0
|
|
|
|
2,025.0
|
|
|
|
375.0
|
|
|
|
400.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,050.0
|
|
|
|
4,190.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
|
|
1,700.8
|
|
|
|
2,537.5
|
|
|
|
1,070.2
|
|
|
|
826.2
|
|
|
|
181.1
|
|
|
|
8,812.4
|
|
|
|
15,128.2
|
|
|
|
15,857.8
|
|
Real-denominated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floating rate loans
|
|
9.26
|
|
|
923.6
|
|
|
|
68.7
|
|
|
|
109.3
|
|
|
|
2,394.0
|
|
|
|
716.7
|
|
|
|
2,441.7
|
|
|
|
6,654.0
|
|
|
|
6,724.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
|
|
923.6
|
|
|
|
68.7
|
|
|
|
109.3
|
|
|
|
2,394.0
|
|
|
|
716.7
|
|
|
|
2,441.7
|
|
|
|
6,654.0
|
|
|
|
6,724.0
|
|
Denominated in other currencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate loan
|
|
9.71
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
134.2
|
|
|
|
144.1
|
|
|
|
144.2
|
|
Floating rate loan
|
|
1.74
|
|
|
19.7
|
|
|
|
13.2
|
|
|
|
27.9
|
|
|
|
28.2
|
|
|
|
26.8
|
|
|
|
129.4
|
|
|
|
245.2
|
|
|
|
243.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
|
|
21.6
|
|
|
|
16.3
|
|
|
|
29.5
|
|
|
|
29.9
|
|
|
|
28.5
|
|
|
|
263.6
|
|
|
|
389.3
|
|
|
|
387.7
|
|
No maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
372.8
|
|
|
|
372.8
|
|
|
|
372.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
2,646.0
|
|
|
|
2,622.5
|
|
|
|
1,209.0
|
|
|
|
3,250.1
|
|
|
|
926.3
|
|
|
|
11,890.5
|
|
|
|
22,544.3
|
|
|
|
23,342.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Weighted average interest rates do
not take into account the effect of the derivatives.
|
(2)
|
|
Weighted average variable interest
rates are based on the applicable reference rate at
December 31, 2009.
|
(3)
|
|
Includes only long-term debt
obligations.
|
101
As of December 31, 2009, the total principal amount and
interest of our real-denominated debt converted through
swaps into U.S. dollars was US$6.7 billion, with an
average cost in U.S. dollars of 4.47% per year after swap
transactions and with maturity between November 2010 and
December 2027. Most of those contracts are subject to
semi-annual interest payments.
Some of these swap transactions have shorter settlement dates
than and similar notional amounts to the interest and principal
payment dates, taking into account the liquidity restrictions of
the market. At each settlement date the financial results of the
swap transaction partially offset the impact of the foreign
dollar exchange rate in our obligations, contributing to a
stable flow of cash disbursements in U.S. dollars for the
interest and principal payments on our real-denominated
debt.
In the event of an appreciation (depreciation) of the real
against the U.S. dollar, the negative (positive) impact
on our real-denominated debt obligations (interest
and/or
principal payment) measured in U.S. dollars will be largely
offset by a positive (negative) effect from any existing swap
transaction, regardless of the real/U.S. dollar
exchange rate on the payment date.
Protection program for real-denominated debt indexed to
CDI
In order to reduce cash flow volatility, we entered into swap
transactions to convert to U.S. dollars the cash flows on
debt instruments denominated in reais linked to CDI. In
those swaps, Vale pays either fixed rates or floating LIBOR
rates in U.S. dollars and receives payments linked to CDI.
These instruments were used to convert cash flows from:
debentures issued in 2006 with a nominal value of
R$5.5 billion (US$2.5 billion at the disbursement
date), credit export notes issued in 2008 with a nominal value
of R$2.0 billion (US$1.1 billion at the disbursement
date) and acquisition financing obtained in 2006 and 2007 with a
nominal value of R$1.0 billion (US$464 million at the
disbursement dates).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2008
|
|
|
At December 31, 2009
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
Rate range
|
|
Rate range
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
Rate range
|
|
Rate range
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Final
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
(payable)
|
|
(receivable)
|
|
gain (loss)
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
(payable)
|
|
(receivable)
|
|
gain (loss)
|
|
|
maturity
|
|
|
(US$ million, except interest rate ranges)
|
|
CDI vs. US$
floating rate
|
|
|
430.0
|
|
|
LIBOR +
(0.676-0.99%)
|
|
CDI + 0.40%/
103.5% CDI
|
|
|
(95
|
)
|
|
|
430.0
|
|
|
LIBOR +
(0.676-0.99%)
|
|
CDI +
0.40%/
103.5% CDI
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
Jan 2015
|
CDI vs. US$
fixed rate
|
|
|
3,672
|
|
|
US$ +
(0.90-5.98%)
|
|
(100-
103.5%) CDI
|
|
|
(375
|
)
|
|
|
3,670.0
|
|
|
US$ +
(4.40-5.98%)
|
|
(100-
103.5%)
CDI
|
|
|
633
|
|
|
Jan 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
US$
|
4,102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$
|
(470
|
)
|
|
US$
|
4,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$
|
685
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Protection program for real-denominated debt indexed to
TJLP
In order to reduce cash flow volatility, we entered into swap
transactions to convert to U.S. dollars the cash flows
related to loans with BNDES indexed to TJLP. In these swaps, we
pay either fixed or floating rates in U.S. dollars and
receive payments linked to TJLP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2008
|
|
|
At December 31, 2009
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
Rate range
|
|
Rate range
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
Rate range
|
|
Rate range
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Final
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
(payable)
|
|
(receivable)
|
|
gain (loss)
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
(payable)
|
|
(receivable)
|
|
gain (loss)
|
|
|
maturity
|
|
|
(US$ million, except interest rate ranges)
|
|
TJLP vs. US$
floating rate swap
|
|
|
378
|
|
|
LIBOR +
(1.89-0.86%)
|
|
TJLP +
-(0.8-1.8%)
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
385
|
|
|
LIBOR +
-(1.89-0.86%)
|
|
TJLP +
(0.8-1.8%)
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
Dec 2019
|
TJLP vs. US$
fixed rate swap
|
|
|
304
|
|
|
US$ +
(2.83-4.30%)
|
|
TJLP +
(0.8-1.8%)
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
|
|
1,048
|
|
|
US$ +
(1.88-4.30%)
|
|
TJLP +
(0.8-1.8%)
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
Dec 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
US$
|
682
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$
|
(90
|
)
|
|
US$
|
1,433
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$
|
108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102
Protection program for euro-denominated floating rate debt
We entered into a swap transaction to convert cash flows related
to a euro-denominated loan with an outstanding notional amount
of 5.3 million. In this swap, we receive floating
rates in EURIBOR and pay floating rates in LIBOR.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2008
|
|
|
At December 31, 2009
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
Rate range
|
|
Rate range
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
Rate range
|
|
Rate range
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Final
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
(payable)
|
|
(receivable)
|
|
gain (loss)
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
(payable)
|
|
(receivable)
|
|
gain (loss)
|
|
|
maturity
|
|
|
(US$ million, except interest rate ranges)
|
|
Euro-denominated debt
|
|
US$
|
8
|
|
|
EURIBOR +
0.875%
|
|
LIBOR +
1.0425%
|
|
US$
|
2
|
|
|
US$
|
5
|
|
|
EURIBOR +
0.875%
|
|
LIBOR +
1.0425%
|
|
US$
|
1.7
|
|
|
Dec 2011
|
Foreign exchange hedges
We entered into swap transactions (cash flow hedges and
non-deliverable forward transactions) to mitigate our exchange
rate exposure arising from the currency mismatch between our
revenues in U.S. dollars and our disbursements and
investments in reais. Those transactions were designated
as cash flow hedges.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2008
|
|
|
At December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
range
|
|
|
Rate range
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
Rate range
|
|
|
Rate range
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Final
|
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
(payable)
|
|
|
(receivable)
|
|
|
gain (loss)
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
(payable)
|
|
|
(receivable)
|
|
|
gain (loss)
|
|
|
maturity
|
|
|
|
(US$ million, except interest rate ranges)
|
|
|
Cash flow hedging
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$
|
1,469
|
|
|
|
USD + 0
|
%
|
|
|
6.12-8.29
|
|
|
US$
|
73.5
|
|
|
|
Dec 2011
|
|
Foreign exchange protection program on cash flow
This program follows the same concept as the previous one, but
in this case the transactions were not designated as cash flow
hedges.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2008
|
|
|
At December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
Rate range
|
|
|
Rate range
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
Rate range
|
|
|
Rate range
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Final
|
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
(payable)
|
|
|
(receivable)
|
|
|
gain (loss)
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
(payable)
|
|
|
(receivable)
|
|
|
gain (loss)
|
|
|
maturity
|
|
|
|
(US$ million, except interest rate ranges)
|
|
|
Forwards sold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.83-1.86
|
|
|
US$
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
|
Oct 2010
|
|
Protection program for dividends
We entered into a swap on October 14, 2009 to hedge the
exchange rate risk related to the disbursement of our
real-denominated dividend payment. We paid a fixed rate
in U.S. dollars and received payment linked to CDI. On the
settlement date, October 29, 2009, we paid
R$1.4 million.
103
Protection program for US$ floating rate debt
Our wholly owned subsidiary Vale Inco entered into a swap to
convert U.S. dollar floating rate debt into U.S dollar
fixed rate debt in connection with debt issued in 2004 with a
notional amount of US$200 million. In this swap, Vale pays
fixed rates in U.S. dollars and receives floating rates in
LIBOR.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2008
|
|
|
At December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
Rate range
|
|
Rate range
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
Rate range
|
|
Rate range
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Final
|
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
(payable)
|
|
(receivable)
|
|
|
gain (loss)
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
(payable)
|
|
(receivable)
|
|
|
gain (loss)
|
|
|
maturity
|
|
|
|
(US$ million, except interest rate ranges)
|
|
|
US$ floating rate debt
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
US$ +
4.795%
|
|
|
LIBOR 3M
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
US$ +
4.795%
|
|
|
LIBOR 3M
|
|
|
|
(8.0
|
)
|
|
|
Dec 2011
|
|
Foreign exchange protection program for fixed price coal
sales
In order to reduce cash flow volatility associated with a fixed
price coal contract, we entered into an Australian dollar
forward purchase contract to equalize production cost and
revenue currencies exposure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2008
|
|
At December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Price range
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
Price range
|
|
gain (loss)
|
|
Quantity
|
|
(USD/AUD)
|
|
gain (loss)
|
|
Final maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(AUD
|
|
|
|
(US$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
million)
|
|
|
|
million)
|
|
|
|
Forward purchase
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
0.66
|
|
|
|
8.61
|
|
|
Jan 2011
|
Product
price risk
We are exposed to various market risks relating to the
volatility of world market prices for the following products:
|
|
|
|
|
iron ore and iron ore pellets, which represented 59.2% of our
2009 gross consolidated revenues;
|
|
|
|
nickel, which represented 13.6% of our 2009 gross
consolidated revenues;
|
|
|
|
copper products, which represented 4.7% of our 2009 gross
consolidated revenues;
|
|
|
|
aluminum products, which represented 8.6% of our 2009 gross
consolidated revenues;
|
|
|
|
coal, which represented 2.1% of our 2009 gross consolidated
revenues;
|
|
|
|
PGMs and other precious metals, which represented 0.9% of our
2009 gross consolidated revenues; and
|
|
|
|
other products.
|
Nickel Strategic cash flow protection program
In order to reduce cash flow volatility in 2009 and 2010, we
entered into hedging transactions that effectively fix nickel
prices for part of our sales for these periods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2008
|
|
At December 31, 2009
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
Final
|
|
|
value
|
|
Price range
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss)
|
|
value
|
|
Price range
|
|
gain (loss)
|
|
maturity
|
|
|
(tons)
|
|
(US$ per ton)
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
(tons)
|
|
(US$ per ton)
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
|
Forwards sold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,122
|
|
|
|
15,300-21,050
|
|
|
|
(20.68
|
)
|
|
|
Dec 2010
|
|
104
Nickel fixed price program
In prior years, we have entered into derivatives in connection
with fixed price nickel contracts to maintain exposure to nickel
price fluctuations. These transactions are intended to achieve a
minimum price equal to the average LME price on the date of
product delivery. These transactions normally involve buying
nickel forwards
(over-the-counter)
or futures (exchange negotiated) and are usually settled on the
settlement dates of the related commercial contracts. We also
have contracts subject to margin calls for some nickel trades
executed by Vale Inco, but the total cash amount as of December
2009 was not material.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2008
|
|
At December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
Final
|
|
|
Quantity
|
|
Price range
|
|
(loss)
|
|
Quantity
|
|
Price range
|
|
gain (loss)
|
|
maturity
|
|
|
(metric
|
|
(US$ per
|
|
|
|
|
|
(US$ per metric
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tons)
|
|
metric ton)
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
(metric tons)
|
|
ton)
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
|
Nickel fixed price program
|
|
|
10,140
|
|
|
|
9,355-37,480
|
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
3,426
|
|
|
|
14,886
|
|
|
|
12.06
|
|
|
|
Mar 2011
|
|
Aluminum strategic cash flow protection program
In order to reduce cash flow volatility in 2009 and 2010, we
entered into hedging transactions that effectively fix aluminum
prices for part of our sales for these periods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2008
|
|
At December 31, 2009
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
Final
|
|
|
value
|
|
Price range
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss)
|
|
value
|
|
Price range
|
|
gain (loss)
|
|
maturity
|
|
|
(tons)
|
|
(US$ per ton)
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
(tons)
|
|
(US$ per ton)
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
|
Puts purchased
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120,000
|
|
|
|
1,900-1,975
|
|
|
|
8.61
|
|
|
|
Dec 2010
|
|
Forwards sold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120,000
|
|
|
|
1,910-2,004
|
|
|
|
(35.61
|
)
|
|
|
Dec 2010
|
|
Calls sold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120,000
|
|
|
|
2,025-2,135
|
|
|
|
(37.33
|
)
|
|
|
Dec 2010
|
|
Input
price risk
We are exposed to various market risks relating to the
volatility of world market prices for the following inputs,
among others:
|
|
|
|
|
outsourced services, which represented 16.6% of our 2009 cost of
goods sold;
|
|
|
|
materials, which represented 19.8% of our 2009 cost of goods
sold;
|
|
|
|
energy, which represented 15.6% of our 2009 cost of goods sold;
and
|
|
|
|
acquisition of products, which represented 5.5% of our 2009 cost
of goods sold.
|
We may hedge certain input price risks with swap contracts,
long-term contracts, embedded derivatives or upstream
integration.
Energy
As a large consumer of electricity, we are investing in power
generation projects and gas exploration to protect against
volatility in the price of energy, regulatory uncertainties and
the risk of energy shortages. We own hydroelectricity power
generation plants in Brazil, Canada and Indonesia, and we
currently generate 24% of our worldwide electricity needs from
our own hydroelectric power plants.
105
We are developing hydroelectric and thermal power plants and
engaging in natural gas exploration programs in order to
increase our energy production and reduce our future exposure to
energy price and supply volatility.
Embedded derivatives energy purchase
Our subsidiary Albras has an embedded energy derivative in a
20-year
contract, expiring in 2024, with Eletronorte, which provides for
an electricity purchase price in reais per MWh and
requires us to pay a premium if the LME trading price of primary
aluminum is in the range of US$1,450 to US$2,773 per metric ton.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2008
|
|
At December 31, 2009
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
Final
|
|
|
value
|
|
Price range
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss)
|
|
value
|
|
Price range
|
|
gain (loss)
|
|
maturity
|
|
|
(tons)
|
|
(US$ per ton)
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
(tons)
|
|
(US$ per ton)
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
|
Calls purchased
|
|
|
200,228
|
|
|
|
1,450-2,773
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
200,228
|
|
|
|
1,450-2,773
|
|
|
|
25.8
|
|
|
|
Dec 2011
|
|
Calls sold
|
|
|
200,228
|
|
|
|
1,450-2,773
|
|
|
|
(49.6
|
)
|
|
|
200,228
|
|
|
|
1,450-2,773
|
|
|
|
(171.7
|
)
|
|
|
Dec 2011
|
|
Protection
program of natural gas
In order to minimize the impact of input price volatility on our
costs, we have entered into natural gas derivative trades,
usually through the purchase of futures and forward contracts.
All positions matured in the fourth quarter of 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2008
|
|
At December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
Price
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Price
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
Final
|
|
|
Quantity
|
|
range
|
|
gain (loss)
|
|
Quantity
|
|
range
|
|
gain (loss)
|
|
maturity
|
|
|
(gigajoules)
|
|
(CAD per
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
(gigajoules)
|
|
(CAD per
|
|
(US$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gigajoule)
|
|
|
|
|
|
gigajoule)
|
|
million)
|
|
|
|
Swaps
|
|
|
1,773,000
|
|
|
|
7.34-7.97
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 2009
|
|
Bunker
oil purchase protection program
In order to reduce the impact of bunker oil price fluctuation on
our freight costs, we have entered into bunker oil derivatives,
usually through forward purchases and swaps.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2008
|
|
At December 31, 2009
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
Final
|
|
|
value
|
|
Price range
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss)
|
|
value
|
|
Price range
|
|
gain (loss)
|
|
maturity
|
|
|
(tons)
|
|
(US$ per ton)
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
(tons)
|
|
(US$ per ton)
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
|
Forwards purchased
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
452,000
|
|
|
|
275-488
|
|
|
|
44.80
|
|
|
|
Dec 2010
|
|
Acquisition
of products
Nickel
purchase protection program
In order to reduce cash flow volatility and eliminate the
mismatch between the pricing of purchased nickel (concentrate,
cathode, sinter and other) and the pricing of the final product
sold to our customers, we entered into hedging transactions. The
items purchased are raw materials utilized to produce refined
nickel. The transactions are usually implemented by the sale of
nickel forward or future contracts at LME or
over-the-counter
operations.
106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2008
|
|
At December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
Final
|
|
|
Quantity
|
|
Price range
|
|
gain (loss)
|
|
Quantity
|
|
Price range
|
|
gain (loss)
|
|
maturity
|
|
|
(metric
|
|
(US$ per
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
(metric
|
|
(US$ per metric
|
|
(US$
|
|
|
|
|
tons)
|
|
metric ton)
|
|
|
|
tons)
|
|
ton)
|
|
million)
|
|
|
|
Nickel purchase protection program
|
|
|
4,944
|
|
|
|
9,117-16,900
|
|
|
|
(6.7
|
)
|
|
|
1,446
|
|
|
|
9,117-16,900
|
|
|
|
(2.20
|
)
|
|
|
Mar 2010
|
|
Embedded
derivatives raw material and intermediate products
purchase
Our wholly owned subsidiary Vale Inco has embedded derivatives
in purchase agreements for nickel concentrate and raw materials
that are linked to nickel and copper future prices.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2008
|
|
At December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
Final
|
|
|
Quantity
|
|
Price range
|
|
gain (loss)
|
|
Quantity
|
|
Price range
|
|
gain (loss)
|
|
maturity
|
|
|
(metric
|
|
(US$ per
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
(metric
|
|
(US$ per metric
|
|
(US$
|
|
|
|
|
tons)
|
|
metric ton)
|
|
|
|
tons)
|
|
ton)
|
|
million)
|
|
|
|
For customer raw material contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nickel forwards
|
|
|
6,213
|
|
|
|
9,686-12,140
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
440
|
|
|
|
16,991-18,525
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
Apr 2010
|
|
Copper forwards
|
|
|
3,072-4,884
|
|
|
|
3,463
|
|
|
|
6,288-6,982
|
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
Apr 2010
|
|
For nickel concentrate customer sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nickel concentrate forwards
|
|
|
3,966
|
|
|
|
10,045-18,615
|
|
|
|
18.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outsourced
services
Maritime
freight hiring protection program
In order to reduce the impact of maritime freight price
fluctuations, we have entered into freight derivatives, usually
through forward purchases.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2008
|
|
At December 31, 2009
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
Final
|
|
|
value
|
|
Price range
|
|
gain (loss)
|
|
value
|
|
Price range
|
|
gain (loss)
|
|
maturity
|
|
|
(tons)
|
|
(US$ per ton)
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
(tons)
|
|
(US$ per day)
|
|
(US$ million)
|
|
|
|
Forwards sold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,125
|
|
|
|
29,000-31,900
|
|
|
|
28.72
|
|
|
|
Dec 2010
|
|
Credit
risk
We are exposed to credit risk arising from trade receivables,
derivative transactions, payment guarantees and cash
investments. The credit risk management process was implemented
through a set of governance documents that establish the
guidelines for granting counterparty limits and for measuring
and controlling credit exposure. The credit risk governance
provides a framework for assessing and managing
counterparties credit risk and for maintaining our risk at
an acceptable level. The risk management committee analyzes and
recommends to the Board of Executive Officers the maximum credit
risk exposure to trade receivables and the maximum credit risk
exposure to financial institutions that are acceptable at both
the counterparty and at the portfolio level.
Credit risk mitigation strategies are designed to hedge our
portfolio to avoid concentration issues and, when necessary, to
comply with the acceptable risk levels established by the Board
of Executive Officers. Speculative credit derivative
transactions are not permitted.
Customer credit limits are established through our risk
management governance guidelines and monitored according to
their credit exposure and their creditworthiness. Customer
credit limits are updated at least once a year, or more often if
there are significant changes in the marketplace.
107
Operational
risk
Operational risk management is the structured approach we take
to manage uncertainty related to inadequate or failed internal
processes, people and systems and to external events.
We mitigate operational risk with new controls and improvement
of existing ones, with transfer of risk through insurance and
establishment of financial provisions. As a result, the company
seeks to have a clear view of its major risks, the best
cost-benefit mitigation plans it must invest in, and the
controls in place to monitor the impact of operational risk
closely and to efficiently allocate capital to reduce it.
III. SHARE
OWNERSHIP AND TRADING
MAJOR
SHAREHOLDERS
Valepar S.A. is Vales controlling shareholder. The
following table sets forth information regarding ownership of
Vale shares as of March 31, 2010 by the shareholders we
know beneficially own more than 5% of any class of our
outstanding capital stock, and by our directors and executive
officers as a group.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares owned
|
|
% of class
|
|
Preferred shares owned
|
|
% of class
|
|
Valepar(1)
|
|
|
1,716,435,045
|
|
|
|
52.7
|
%
|
|
|
20,340,000
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
BNDESPAR(2)
|
|
|
218,386,481
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
|
|
69,432,771
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
Directors and executive officers as a group
|
|
|
141,307
|
|
|
|
Less than 1.0
|
%
|
|
|
1,197,075
|
|
|
|
Less than 1.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
See the following tables for
information about Valepars shareholders.
|
(2)
|
|
BNDESPAR is a wholly owned
subsidiary of BNDES. The figures do not include common shares
beneficially (as opposed to directly) owned by BNDESPAR.
|
The Brazilian government also owns 12 golden shares of Vale,
which give it veto powers over certain actions, such as changes
to our name, the location of our headquarters and our corporate
purpose as it relates to mining activities.
The table below set forth information regarding ownership of
Valepar common shares as of March 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares owned
|
|
|
% of class
|
|
|
Valepar shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Litel Participações S.A.(1)
|
|
|
637,443,857
|
|
|
|
49.00
|
%
|
Eletron S.A.(2)
|
|
|
380,708
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
Bradespar S.A.(3)
|
|
|
275,965,821
|
|
|
|
21.21
|
|
Mitsui & Co. Ltd.(4)
|
|
|
237,328,059
|
|
|
|
18.24
|
|
BNDESPAR(5)
|
|
|
149,787,385
|
|
|
|
11.51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,300,905,830
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Litel owns 200,864,272 preferred
class A shares of Valepar, which represents 71.41% of the
preferred class A shares. Litela, an affiliate of Litel,
owns 80,416,931 preferred class A shares of Valepar, which
represents 28.59% of the preferred class A shares. LitelB,
also an affiliate of Litel, owns 25,862,068 preferred
class C shares of Valepar, which represents 29.25% of the
preferred class C shares.
|
(2)
|
|
Eletron owns 32,729 preferred
class C shares of Valepar, which represents 0.04% of the
preferred class C shares.
|
(3)
|
|
Bradespar is controlled by a
control group consisting of Cidade de Deus Cia.
Comercial Participações, Fundação Bradesco,
NCF Participações S.A. and Nova Cidade de Deus
Participações S.A. Bradespar owns 16,137,193 preferred
class C shares of Valepar, which represents 18.25% of the
preferred class C shares. Brumado Holdings Ltda., a
subsidiary of Bradespar, owns 7,587,000 preferred class A
shares of Valepar, which represents 8.58% of the class.
|
(4)
|
|
Mitsui owns 20,402,587 preferred
class C shares of Valepar, which represents 23.08% of the
preferred class C shares.
|
(5)
|
|
BNDESPAR owns 18,394,143 preferred
class C shares of Valepar, which represents 20.80% of the
preferred class C shares.
|
108
The table below set forth information regarding ownership of
Litel Participações S.A., one of Valepars
shareholders, as of March 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares owned
|
|
|
% of class
|
|
|
Litel Participações S.A. shareholders(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BB Carteira Ativa
|
|
|
193,740,121
|
|
|
|
78.40
|
%
|
Carteira Ativa II
|
|
|
53,387,982
|
|
|
|
21.60
|
|
Previ
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
−
|
|
Others
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
|
−
|
|
Directors and executive officers as a group
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
−
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
247,128,345
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Each of BB Carteira Ativa and
Carteira Ativa II is a Brazilian investment fund. BB
Carteira Ativa is 100% owned by Previ. Carteira Ativa II is
59.36% owned by Funcef, 35.81% owned by Petros and 4.84% owned
by Fundação Cesp. Each of Previ, Petros, Funcef and
Fundação Cesp is a Brazilian pension fund.
|
The shareholders of Valepar are parties to a shareholders
agreement, ending in 2017. Under this agreement, each of the
shareholders of Valepar has the right to veto the transfer by
Valepar of any Vale shares it holds. The Valepar
shareholders agreement also:
|
|
|
|
|
grants rights of first refusal on any transfer of Valepar shares
and preemptive rights on any new issue of Valepar shares;
|
|
|
|
prohibits the direct acquisition of Vale shares by
Valepars shareholders unless authorized by the other
shareholders party to the agreement;
|
|
|
|
prohibits encumbrances on Valepar shares (other than in
connection with financing an acquisition of Vale shares);
|
|
|
|
requires each party generally to retain control of its special
purpose company holding its interest in shares of Valepar,
unless the rights of first refusal mentioned above are observed;
|
|
|
|
allocates seats on Valepars and Vales boards among
representatives of the parties;
|
|
|
|
commits the Valepar shareholders to support a Vale dividend
policy of distributing 50% of Vales net profit for each
fiscal year, unless the Valepar shareholders commit to support a
different dividend policy for a given year;
|
|
|
|
provides for the maintenance by Vale of a capital structure that
does not exceed specified debt to equity thresholds;
|
|
|
|
requires the Valepar shareholders to vote their indirectly held
Vale shares and to cause their representatives on Vales
Board of Directors to vote only in accordance with decisions
made at Valepar meetings held prior to meetings of Vales
Board of Directors or shareholders; and
|
|
|
|
establishes supermajority voting requirements for certain
significant actions relating to Valepar and to Vale.
|
Pursuant to the Valepar shareholders agreement, Valepar
cannot support any of the following actions with respect to Vale
without the consent of at least 75% of the holders of
Valepars common shares:
|
|
|
|
|
any amendment of Vales bylaws;
|
109
|
|
|
|
|
any increase of Vales capital stock by share subscription,
creation of a new class of shares, change in the characteristics
of the existing shares or any reduction of Vales capital
stock;
|
|
|
|
any issuance of debentures of Vale, whether or not convertible
into shares of Vale, participation certificates upon
compensation (partes beneficiárias), call options
(bônus de subscrição) or any other
security of Vale;
|
|
|
|
any determination of issuance price for any new shares of
capital stock or other security of Vale;
|
|
|
|
any amalgamation, spin-off or merger to which Vale is a party,
as well as any change to Vales corporate form;
|
|
|
|
any dissolution, receivership, bankruptcy or any other voluntary
act for financial reorganization or any suspension thereof;
|
|
|
|
the election and replacement of Vales Board of Directors,
including the Chairman of the Board, and any executive officer
of Vale;
|
|
|
|
the disposal or acquisition by Vale of an equity interest in any
company, as well as the acquisition of any shares of capital
stock of Vale or Valepar;
|
|
|
|
the participation by Vale in a group of companies or in a
consortium of any kind;
|
|
|
|
the execution by Vale of agreements relating to distribution,
investment, sales exportation, technology transfer, trademark
license, patent exploration, license to use and leases;
|
|
|
|
the approval and amendment of Vales business plan;
|
|
|
|
the determination of the compensation of the executive officers
and directors of Vale, as well as the duties of the Board of
Directors and the Board of Executive Officers;
|
|
|
|
any profit sharing among the members of the Board of Directors
or Board of Executive Officers of Vale;
|
|
|
|
any change in the corporate purpose of Vale;
|
|
|
|
the distribution or non-distribution of any dividends (including
distributions classified as interest on shareholders
equity) on any shares of capital stock of Vale other than as
provided in Vales bylaws;
|
|
|
|
the appointment and replacement of Vales independent
auditor;
|
|
|
|
the creation of any in rem guarantee, granting of
guarantees including rendering of sureties by Vale with respect
to obligations of any unrelated party, including any affiliates
or subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
the passing of any resolution on any matter which, pursuant to
applicable law, entitles a shareholder to withdrawal rights;
|
|
|
|
the appointment and replacement by the Board of Directors of any
representative of Vale in subsidiaries, companies related to
Vale or other companies in which Vale is entitled to appoint
directors and officers; and
|
|
|
|
any change in the debt to equity threshold, as defined in the
shareholders agreement.
|
In addition, the shareholders agreement provides that any
issuance of participation certificates by Vale and any
disposition by Valepar of Vale shares requires the unanimous
consent of all of Valepars shareholders.
110
RELATED
PARTY TRANSACTIONS
We have arms-length commercial relationships in the
ordinary course of our business with Mitsui, a shareholder of
Valepar (our controlling shareholder) and with a number of
companies that are affiliated with shareholders of Valepar, such
as Cemig and Usiminas (in each of which Previ holds an
interest), and we have financial relationships with Bradesco,
which is controlled by the same controlling group as Bradespar,
also a shareholder of Valepar.
BNDES is the parent company of one of our major shareholders,
BNDESPAR. We and BNDES, the Brazilian state-owned development
bank, are parties to a contract relating to authorizations for
mining exploration. This contract, which we refer to as the
Mineral Risk Contract, provides for the joint development of
certain unexplored mineral deposits that form part of our
Northern System (Carajás), as well as proportional
participation in any profits earned from the development of such
resources. Iron ore and manganese ore deposits already
identified at the time we entered into the Mineral Risk Contract
(in March 1997) were specifically excluded from the
contract. In 2007, the Mineral Risk Contract was extended
indefinitely, with specific rules for all exploration projects
and exploration targets and mineral rights covered under the
contract. In addition, BNDES has participated in certain of our
financing arrangements. For more information on our transactions
with BNDES, see Operating and financial review and
prospectsLiquidity and capital resources.
For information regarding investments in affiliated companies
and joint ventures and for information regarding transactions
with major related parties, see Notes 13 and 24 to our
consolidated financial statements.
DISTRIBUTIONS
Under our dividend policy, our Board of Executive Officers
proposes to our Board of Directors, no later than January 31 of
each year, a minimum value, expressed in U.S. dollars, that
will be distributed in that year to our shareholders.
Distributions may be classified for tax purposes either as
dividends or interest on shareholders equity, and
references to dividends should be understood to
include all distributions regardless of their tax
classification, unless stated otherwise. We determine the
minimum dividend payment in U.S. dollars, considering our
expected free cash flow generation in the year of distribution.
The proposal establishes two installments, to be paid in April
and October of each year. Each installment is submitted to the
Board of Directors for approval at meetings in April and
October. Once approved, dividends are converted into and paid in
reais at the Brazilian real/U.S. dollar
exchange rates announced by the Central Bank of Brazil on the
last business day before the Board meetings in April and October
of each year. The Board of Executive Officers can also propose
to the Board of Directors, depending on the evolution of our
cash flow performance, an additional payment to shareholders of
an amount over and above the minimum dividend initially
established.
For 2010, our Board of Executive Officers has proposed a minimum
dividend of US$2.5 billion. We pay the same amount per
share on both common and preferred shares in accordance with our
bylaws. The first installment of this dividend of
US$1.250 billion will be paid on April 30, 2010.
Under Brazilian law and our bylaws, we are required to
distribute to our shareholders an annual amount equal to not
less than 25% of the distributable amount, referred to as the
mandatory dividend, unless the Board of Directors advises our
shareholders at our shareholders meeting that payment of
the mandatory dividend for the preceding year is inadvisable in
light of our financial condition. For a discussion of dividend
distribution provisions under Brazilian corporate law and our
bylaws, see Additional information.
Distributions classified for tax purposes as dividends which are
paid to ADR holders and to
non-resident
shareholders will not be subject to Brazilian withholding tax,
except that a distribution from profits generated prior to
December 31, 1995 will be subject to Brazilian withholding
tax at varying rates. Distributions classified for tax purposes
as interest on shareholders equity which are paid to ADR
holders and
111
to non-resident shareholders are currently subject to Brazilian
withholding tax. See Additional
informationTaxationBrazilian tax
considerations.
By law, we are required to hold an annual shareholders
meeting by April 30 of each year at which an annual dividend may
be declared. Additionally, our Board of Directors may declare
interim dividends. Under Brazilian corporate law, dividends are
generally required to be paid to the holder of record on a
dividend declaration date within 60 days following the date
the dividend was declared, unless a shareholders
resolution sets forth another date of payment, which, in either
case, must occur prior to the end of the fiscal year in which
the dividend was declared. A shareholder has a three-year period
from the dividend payment date to claim dividends (or payments
of interest on shareholders equity) in respect of its
shares, after which we will have no liability for such payments.
From 1997 to 2003, all distributions took the form of interest
on shareholders equity. In each year since 2004, part of
the distribution was made in the form of interest on
shareholders equity and part as dividends. See
Additional informationMemorandum and articles of
associationCommon shares and preferred shares.
We make cash distributions on the common shares and preferred
shares underlying the ADSs in reais to the custodian on
behalf of the depositary. The custodian then converts such
proceeds into U.S. dollars and transfers such
U.S. dollars to be delivered to the depositary for
distribution to holders of American Depositary Receipts. The
depositary charges a fee of up to US$0.02 per ADS for each
distribution. For information on taxation of dividend
distributions, see Additional
informationTaxationBrazilian tax
considerations.
The following table sets forth the cash distributions we paid to
holders of common shares and preferred shares for the periods
indicated. Amounts have been restated to give effect to stock
splits that we carried out in subsequent periods. We have
calculated U.S. dollar conversions using the commercial
selling rate in effect on the date of payment. Amounts are
stated before any applicable withholding tax.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollars per share at
|
Year
|
|
Payment date
|
|
Reais per share
|
|
payment date
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends
|
|
Interest on equity
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
April 30
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
0.05
|
|
|
|
October 31
|
|
|
0.29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.29
|
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
2004
|
|
April 30
|
|
|
0.17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.17
|
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
October 29
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
0.26
|
|
|
|
0.32
|
|
|
|
0.11
|
|
2005
|
|
April 29
|
|
|
0.28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.28
|
|
|
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
October 31
|
|
|
0.22
|
|
|
|
0.17
|
|
|
|
0.39
|
|
|
|
0.18
|
|
2006
|
|
April 28
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
|
|
0.17
|
|
|
|
0.29
|
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
October 31
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
0.28
|
|
|
|
0.29
|
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
2007
|
|
April 30
|
|
|
0.22
|
|
|
|
0.13
|
|
|
|
0.35
|
|
|
|
0.17
|
|
|
|
October 31
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
0.38
|
|
|
|
0.39
|
|
|
|
0.22
|
|
2008
|
|
April 30
|
|
|
0.20
|
|
|
|
0.24
|
|
|
|
0.44
|
|
|
|
0.26
|
|
|
|
October 31
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
0.51
|
|
|
|
0.65
|
|
|
|
0.30
|
|
2009
|
|
April 30
|
|
|
0.52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.52
|
|
|
|
0.24
|
|
|
|
October 30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.49
|
|
|
|
0.49
|
|
|
|
0.29
|
|
2010
|
|
April 30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.42
|
|
|
|
0.42
|
|
|
|
0.24
|
|
TRADING
MARKETS
Our publicly traded share capital consists of common shares and
preferred shares, each without par value. Our common shares and
our preferred shares are publicly traded in Brazil on the
BM&FBOVESPA, under the ticker symbols VALE3 and VALE5,
respectively. Our common shares and preferred shares also trade
on the LATIBEX, under the ticker symbols XVALO and XVALP,
respectively. The LATIBEX is a
non-regulated
electronic market created in 1999 by the Madrid stock exchange
in order to enable trading of Latin American equity securities.
112
Our common ADSs, each representing one common share, are traded
on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), under the
ticker symbol VALE. Our preferred ADSs, each representing one
preferred share, are traded on the NYSE, under the ticker symbol
VALE.P. Our common ADSs and preferred ADSs are traded on
Euronext Paris, under the ticker symbols VALE3 and VALE5,
respectively. JPMorgan Chase Bank serves as the depositary for
both the common and the preferred ADSs.
On March 31, 2010, there were 1,486,890,471 ADSs
outstanding, 722,042,160 common ADSs and 768,848,311 preferred
ADSs, representing 23.0% of our common shares and 37.7% of our
preferred shares, or 28.7% of our total share capital.
SHARE
PRICE HISTORY
The following table sets forth trading information for our ADSs,
as reported by the New York Stock Exchange and our shares, as
reported by the BM&FBOVESPA, for the periods indicated.
Share prices in the table have been adjusted to reflect stock
splits.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BM&F BOVESPA (Reais per share)
|
|
NYSE (US$ per share)
|
|
|
Common share
|
|
Preferred share
|
|
Common ADS
|
|
Preferred ADS
|
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
2005
|
|
|
24.98
|
|
|
|
16.00
|
|
|
|
21.75
|
|
|
|
13.75
|
|
|
|
11.27
|
|
|
|
6.40
|
|
|
|
9.89
|
|
|
|
5.49
|
|
2006
|
|
|
32.50
|
|
|
|
21.86
|
|
|
|
27.50
|
|
|
|
18.55
|
|
|
|
15.17
|
|
|
|
9.88
|
|
|
|
13.13
|
|
|
|
8.05
|
|
2007
|
|
|
65.90
|
|
|
|
29.40
|
|
|
|
55.62
|
|
|
|
25.42
|
|
|
|
37.75
|
|
|
|
13.76
|
|
|
|
31.59
|
|
|
|
11.83
|
|
2008
|
|
|
72.09
|
|
|
|
22.10
|
|
|
|
58.70
|
|
|
|
20.24
|
|
|
|
43.91
|
|
|
|
8.80
|
|
|
|
35.84
|
|
|
|
7.95
|
|
1Q
|
|
|
62.50
|
|
|
|
45.00
|
|
|
|
52.50
|
|
|
|
40.61
|
|
|
|
37.22
|
|
|
|
26.57
|
|
|
|
31.22
|
|
|
|
23.90
|
|
2Q
|
|
|
72.09
|
|
|
|
55.44
|
|
|
|
58.70
|
|
|
|
46.75
|
|
|
|
43.91
|
|
|
|
34.44
|
|
|
|
35.84
|
|
|
|
28.61
|
|
3Q
|
|
|
55.01
|
|
|
|
33.80
|
|
|
|
46.04
|
|
|
|
30.30
|
|
|
|
34.50
|
|
|
|
16.70
|
|
|
|
28.56
|
|
|
|
15.32
|
|
4Q
|
|
|
36.39
|
|
|
|
22.10
|
|
|
|
32.70
|
|
|
|
20.24
|
|
|
|
18.61
|
|
|
|
8.80
|
|
|
|
17.70
|
|
|
|
7.95
|
|
2009
|
|
|
50.30
|
|
|
|
27.69
|
|
|
|
43.37
|
|
|
|
23.89
|
|
|
|
29.53
|
|
|
|
11.90
|
|
|
|
25.66
|
|
|
|
21.91
|
|
1Q
|
|
|
38.75
|
|
|
|
27.69
|
|
|
|
32.48
|
|
|
|
23.89
|
|
|
|
17.70
|
|
|
|
11.90
|
|
|
|
14.70
|
|
|
|
10.36
|
|
2Q
|
|
|
40.00
|
|
|
|
31.50
|
|
|
|
33.79
|
|
|
|
27.05
|
|
|
|
20.83
|
|
|
|
13.82
|
|
|
|
17.70
|
|
|
|
11.93
|
|
3Q
|
|
|
41.77
|
|
|
|
31.89
|
|
|
|
37.02
|
|
|
|
27.75
|
|
|
|
23.28
|
|
|
|
15.88
|
|
|
|
20.73
|
|
|
|
13.73
|
|
4Q
|
|
|
50.30
|
|
|
|
40.05
|
|
|
|
43.37
|
|
|
|
35.67
|
|
|
|
29.53
|
|
|
|
22.30
|
|
|
|
25.66
|
|
|
|
19.90
|
|
1Q 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 2009
|
|
|
50.28
|
|
|
|
47.70
|
|
|
|
43.20
|
|
|
|
40.90
|
|
|
|
29.40
|
|
|
|
27.45
|
|
|
|
25.33
|
|
|
|
23.25
|
|
January 2010
|
|
|
54.95
|
|
|
|
48.78
|
|
|
|
47.25
|
|
|
|
41.96
|
|
|
|
31.48
|
|
|
|
25.79
|
|
|
|
26.94
|
|
|
|
22.56
|
|
February 2010
|
|
|
52.17
|
|
|
|
47.16
|
|
|
|
45.20
|
|
|
|
40.80
|
|
|
|
28.82
|
|
|
|
25.18
|
|
|
|
24.94
|
|
|
|
21.91
|
|
March 2010
|
|
|
57.45
|
|
|
|
50.97
|
|
|
|
49.55
|
|
|
|
44.65
|
|
|
|
32.29
|
|
|
|
28.46
|
|
|
|
27.76
|
|
|
|
24.78
|
|
April 2010(1)
|
|
|
59.85
|
|
|
|
56.17
|
|
|
|
51.34
|
|
|
|
49.00
|
|
|
|
34.55
|
|
|
|
31.93
|
|
|
|
29.46
|
|
|
|
27.78
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Until April 26, 2010.
|
AMERICAN
DEPOSITARY SHARES
JPMorgan Chase Bank serves as the depositary for our ADSs. ADR
holders are required to pay various fees to the depositary, and
the depositary may refuse to provide any service for which a fee
is assessed until the applicable fee has been paid.
ADR holders are required to pay the depositary amounts in
respect of expenses incurred by the depositary or its agents on
behalf of ADR holders, including expenses arising from
compliance with applicable law, taxes or other governmental
charges, facsimile transmission or conversion of foreign
currency into U.S. dollars. In this case, the depositary
may decide in its sole discretion to seek payment by either
billing holders or by deducting the fee from one or more cash
dividends or other cash distributions.
113
ADR holders are also required to pay additional fees for certain
services provided by the depositary, as set forth in the table
below.
|
|
|
Depositary service
|
|
Fee payable by ADR holders
|
|
Issuance and delivery of ADRs, including in connection with
share distributions, stock splits
|
|
US$5.00 or less per 100 ADSs (or portion thereof)
|
Distribution of dividends
|
|
US$0.02 or less per ADS
|
Withdrawal of shares underlying ADSs
|
|
US$5.00 or less per 100 ADSs (or portion thereof)
|
Transfers, combining or grouping of ADRs
|
|
US$1.50 or less per ADS
|
Direct
and indirect payments by the depositary
The depositary reimburses us for certain expenses we incur in
connection with the ADR program, subject to a ceiling agreed
between us and the depositary from time to time. These
reimbursable expenses currently include legal and accounting
fees, listing fees, investor relations expenses and fees payable
to service providers for the distribution of material to ADR
holders. For the year ended December 31, 2009, such
reimbursements totaled US$9 million.
PURCHASES
OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED
PURCHASERS
In May 2009, our Board of Directors approved the termination of
a share buy-back program that was initiated in October 2008. The
program contemplated the acquisition of up to 69,944,380 common
shares and up to 169,210,249 preferred shares, corresponding
respectively to 5.5% and 8.5% of the free float of each class as
of the launch date. Upon termination, we had acquired 18,415,859
common shares and 47,284,800 preferred shares, corresponding
respectively to 1.5% and 2.4% of the free float of each class as
of the launch date, which will be held in treasury until
disposal or cancellation. The shares were acquired at an average
weighted unit cost of US$11.60.
The results of our share buy-back program for 2009 are set forth
below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total number of shares
|
|
|
Maximum number (or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(or units) purchased as
|
|
|
approximate US$ value)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
part of publicly
|
|
|
of shares (or units) that
|
|
|
Total number of shares
|
|
|
Average price paid per
|
|
|
announced plans or
|
|
|
may yet be purchased
|
Period
|
|
(or units) purchased
|
|
|
share (or units)
|
|
|
programs
|
|
|
under the program
|
|
Common shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 2009
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
|
|
14.22
|
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
|
|
Preferred shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 2009
|
|
|
771,400
|
|
|
|
12.18
|
|
|
|
771,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
831,400
|
|
|
|
12.33
|
|
|
|
831,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
IV.
|
MANAGEMENT
AND EMPLOYEES
|
MANAGEMENT
Board of
directors
Our Board of Directors sets general guidelines and policies for
our business and monitors the implementation of those guidelines
and policies by our executive officers. Our bylaws provide that
the Board of Directors consist of eleven members and eleven
alternates, each of whom serves on behalf of a particular
director. Each director (and his or her respective alternate) is
elected for a two-year term at a general shareholders
meeting, can be re-elected, and is subject to removal at any
time.
The Board of Directors holds regularly scheduled meetings on a
monthly basis and holds additional meetings when called by the
chairman, vice-chairman or any two directors. Decisions of the
Board of Directors require a quorum of a majority of the
directors and are taken by majority vote. Alternate directors
may attend and vote at meetings in the absence of the director
for whom the alternate director is acting.
Our bylaws establish the following technical and advisory
committees to the Board of Directors.
|
|
|
|
|
The Executive Development Committee is responsible for reporting
on general human resources policies, analyzing and reporting on
the adequacy of compensation levels for our executive officers,
proposing and updating guidelines for evaluating the performance
of our executive officers, and reporting on policies relating to
health and safety.
|
|
|
|
The Strategy Committee is responsible for reviewing and making
recommendations to the Board of Directors concerning: the
strategic guidelines and plan submitted annually to the Board by
our executive officers, our annual and multi-annual investment
budgets, investment or divestiture opportunities submitted by
executive officers, and mergers and acquisitions.
|
|
|
|
The Finance Committee is responsible for reviewing and making
recommendations to the Board of Directors concerning: our
corporate risks and financial policies and the internal
financial control systems, compatibility between the level of
distributions to shareholders and the parameters established in
the annual budget, and the consistency between our general
dividend policy and capital structure.
|
|
|
|
The Accounting Committee is responsible for: nominating an
employee to be responsible for our internal auditing, reporting
on auditing policies and the execution of our annual auditing
plan, tracking the results of our internal auditing, and
identifying, prioritizing, and submitting recommendations to the
executive officers, and analyzing and making recommendations
with regard to our annual report and financial statements.
|
|
|
|
The Governance and Sustainability Committee is responsible for:
evaluating and recommending improvements to the effectiveness of
our corporate governance practices and the functioning of our
Board of Directors, recommending improvements to the code of
ethical conduct and our management system in order to avoid
conflicts of interests between Vale and its shareholders or
management, issuing reports on potential conflicts of interest
between Vale and its shareholders or management, and reporting
on policies relating to corporate responsibility, such as
environmental and social responsibility.
|
Nine of our 10 current directors (and their respective
alternates) were appointed by Valepar, our controlling
shareholder, pursuant to Valepars shareholders
agreement. Non-controlling shareholders holding common shares
representing at least 15% of our voting capital, and preferred
shares representing at least 10% of our total share capital,
have the right to appoint one member and an alternate to our
Board of Directors. Our employees and our non-controlling
shareholders each have the right, as a class, to appoint one
director
115
and an alternate. All of our current directors were, except for
Mr. Tonoki, elected or re-elected, as the case may be, at our
annual shareholders meeting in April 2009. Their terms
will expire in 2011.
The following table lists the current members of the Board of
Directors and each directors alternate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director(1)
|
|
Year first elected
|
|
Alternate director(1)
|
|
Year first elected
|
|
Sérgio Ricardo Silva Rosa (chairman)
|
|
2003
|
|
Luiz Felix de Freitas
|
|
2009
|
Mário da Silveira Teixeira Júnior
(vice-chairman)
|
|
2003
|
|
João Moisés de Oliveira
|
|
2000
|
José Ricardo Sasseron
|
|
2007
|
|
Rita de Cássia Paz Andrade Robles
|
|
2005
|
Jorge Luiz Pacheco
|
|
2003
|
|
Deli Soares Pereira
|
|
2009
|
Sandro Kohler Marcondes
|
|
2007
|
|
Luiz Augusto Ckless Silva
|
|
2009
|
Renato da Cruz Gomes
|
|
2001
|
|
Luiz Carlos de Freitas
|
|
2007
|
Ken Abe
|
|
2009
|
|
Hajime Tonoki(3)
|
|
2009
|
Oscar Augusto de Camargo Filho
|
|
2003
|
|
Wanderlei Viçoso Fagundes
|
|
2003
|
Luciano Galvão Coutinho
|
|
2007
|
|
Paulo Sérgio Moreira da Fonseca
|
|
2007
|
Eduardo Fernando Jardim Pinto(2)
|
|
2009
|
|
Raimundo Nonato Alves Amorim(2)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Appointed by Valepar and approved
at the shareholders meeting unless otherwise indicated.
One seat on our Board of Directors is currently vacant.
|
(2)
|
|
Appointed by our employees and
approved at the shareholders meeting.
|
(3)
|
|
Nominated by the Board of Directors
in September 2009 to substitute Mr. Hidehiro Takahashi, who
resigned. The nomination of Mr. Tonoki was confirmed at the
shareholders meeting on January 22, 2010.
|
Below is a summary of the business experience, activities and
areas of expertise of our current directors.
Sérgio Ricardo Silva Rosa, 50: Director
of Vale since April 2003; Chairman of our Board of Directors
since May 2003; Chief Executive Officer of Caixa de
Previdência dos Funcionários do Banco do Brasil
(Previ) and Litel Participações S.A.; and
a member of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer
of Valepar.
Other current director or officer
positions: Member of the Boards of Directors of
Brasil Telecom Participações since 2000 and of
Sauípe S.A. since 2001.
Professional experience: President of
Confederação Nacional dos Bancários from June
1994 to May 2000; Alderman of the Municipality of São Paulo
from January 1995 to December 1996.
Academic background: Degree in Journalism from
the Universidade de São Paulo (USP).
Mário da Silveira Teixeira Júnior,
64: Director of Vale since April 2003 and
Vice-Chairman since May 2003, and Vice-Chairman of the Board of
Directors of Valepar S.A.
Other current director or officer
positions: Member of the Board of Directors of
Banco Bradesco since 2002; member of the Board of Directors of
Banco Espírito Santo de Investimentos S.A.; member of the
Board of Directors of Bradespar S.A.; and member of the Board of
Directors of Bradesco Leasing S.A.Arrendamento Mercantil.
Professional experience: Member of the Board
of Directors of Banco Bradesco from March 1999 to July 2001;
President of Bradespar S.A.; Executive Vice-President, Executive
Managing Officer and Department Director at Banco Bradesco S.A.
(Banco Bradesco); and officer of Bradesco S.A.
Corretora de Títulos e Valores Mobiliários from March
1983 to January 1984. Mr. Teixeira was executive
vice-president of the National Association of the Investment
Banks (ANBID); member of the Board of Directors of
the Brazilian Association of Publicly-Held Companies
(ABRASCA); vice-chairman of the Board of Directors
of BES Investimento do BrasilBanco de Investimento; and
member of the boards of directors of Companhia Paulista de
Força e LuzCPFL, Companhia Piratininga de Força
e Luz, Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional,
116
CPFL Energia S.A., CPFL Geração de Energia S.A.,
Latasa S.A., São Paulo Alpargatas S.A., Tigre S.A. Tubos e
Conexões, VBC Energia S.A. and VBC Participações
S.A.
Academic background: Degree in Civil
Engineering and Business Administration from Universidade
Presbiteriana Mackenzie, São Paulo.
José Ricardo Sasseron, 54: Director of
Vale since April 2007 and Officer of Previ.
Professional experience: Member of the
Conselho de Gestão e Previdência Complementar
(CGPC) and President of the Associação
Nacional dos Participantes de Fundo de Pensão
(ANAPAR) since 2001; chairman of the Board of
Directors of Sauípe S.A from 2005 to 2007; member of the
Advisory Board of Previ from 2004 to 2006 and chairman of the
fiscal council of Previ from 1996 to 1998.
Academic background: Degree in History from
the Universidade de São Paulo (USP).
Jorge Luiz Pacheco, 55: Director of Vale since
April 2003 and Manager of strategic investments at Previ since
2000.
Other current director or officer
positions: Director of Valepar and Officer of
Litel.
Professional experience: Worked at Banco do
Brasil from 1973 to 2000. Mr. Pacheco has held an officer
position in the fiscal council of Companhia Siderúrgica
Belgo-Mineira.
Academic background: Degree in Economics from
Universidade Cândido Mendes, and post-graduate degrees in
Finance and Business Management from Instituto Brasileiro de
Mercado de Capitais (IBMEC) in Rio de Janeiro.
Sandro Kohler Marcondes, 46: Director of Vale
since April 2007 and Officer of BB Leasing, Banco do Brasil
Securities in New York, BB Securities in London, and BB Tur.
Other current director or officer
positions: Officer of Banco do Brasil since July
2005.
Professional experience: Worked in various
capacities in Banco do Brasil, both in Brazil and abroad since
1982.
Academic background: Bachelors degree in
Business Administration from the Universidade Estadual de
Guarapuava and Masters degree from Fundação
Getúlio Vargas (FGV) in São Paulo.
Renato da Cruz Gomes, 57: Director of Vale
since April 2001 and Executive Officer and member of the Board
of Directors of Valepar.
Other current director or officer
positions: Executive Officer of Bradespar S.A.
since 2000.
Professional experience: Mr. Gomes held a
variety of positions at BNDES from 1976 to 2000, and served on
the boards of directors of Aracruz Celulose S.A., Iochpe Maxion
S.A., Bahia Sul Celulose S.A., Globo Cabo S.A. and Latasa.
Academic background: Degree in Engineering
from Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro and graduate degree
in Management Development from Sociedade de Desenvolvimento
Empresarial (SDE).
Ken Abe, 62: Director of Vale since April 2009.
Other current director or officer
positions: Representative and Executive
Vice-President of Mitsui & Co. since June 2008.
117
Professional experience: Variety of positions
at Mitsui & Co., Ltd. since 1970 and member of the
Board of Directors of Valepar from October 2003 until April 2006.
Academic background: Degree in Economics from
Waseda University, Japan.
Oscar Augusto de Camargo Filho,72: Director of
Vale since October 2003; Director of Valepar; and Partner of CWH
Consultoria Empresarial.
Professional experience: Chairman of the Board
of Directors of MRS from 1999 to 2003 and Chief Executive
Officer and member of the Board of Directors of
CAEMI Mineração e Metalurgia S.A.
(CAEMI), where Mr. Camargo Filho also held
various positions from 1973 to 2003. From 1963 to 1973,
Mr. Camargo Filho held positions at Motores Perkins S.A.,
including commercial officer and sales and services manager.
Academic background: Law degree from the
Universidade de São Paulo (USP).
Luciano Galvão Coutinho, 63: Director of
Vale since August 2007.
Other current director or officer
positions: President of BNDES.
Professional experience: Partner of LCA
Consultores from 1995 until 2007 and executive secretary of the
Ministry of Science and Technology from 1985 to 1988.
Mr. Coutinho is an invited professor at the Universidade
Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) and has been a
visiting professor at the Universidade de São Paulo, the
University of Paris XIII, the University of Texas and the Ortega
y Gasset Institute.
Academic background: Degree in Economics from
the Universidade de São Paulo, where Mr. Coutinho was
awarded the Gastão Vidigal prize for best economics
student; Masters degree in Economics from the Economic
Research Institute of the Universidade de São Paulo and
Ph.D. in Economics from Cornell University.
Eduardo Fernando Jardim Pinto, 47: Director of
Vale since April 2009 and Coordinator of CUTVALE.
Professional experience: Member of our Board
of Directors from 2005 to 2007 and President of the railroad
employees union in the states of Pará, Maranhão and
Tocantins. Since 1983, Mr. Jardim Pinto has held several
positions at Vale, including as a specialized train conductor.
Academic background: Law degree from Faculdade
São Luís, Maranhão.
Executive
officers
The executive officers are responsible for
day-to-day
operations and the implementation of the general policies and
guidelines set forth by the Board of Directors. Our bylaws
provide for a minimum of six and a maximum of eleven executive
officers. The executive officers hold weekly meetings and hold
additional meetings when called by any executive officer. Under
Brazilian corporate law, executive officers must be Brazilian
residents.
The Board of Directors appoints executive officers for two-year
terms and may remove them at any time. All of our current
executive officers were elected or re-elected, as the case may
be, at the Board of
118
Directors meeting held on May 21, 2009. Their terms
will expire in 2011. The following table lists our current
executive officers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
appointment
|
|
Position
|
|
Age
|
|
Roger Agnelli
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
50
|
|
Fabio de Oliveira Barbosa
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
49
|
|
José Carlos Martins
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Executive Officer (Ferrous Minerals)
|
|
|
60
|
|
Eduardo de Salles Bartolomeo
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Executive Officer (Logistics, Project Management and
Sustainability)
|
|
|
46
|
|
Carla Grasso
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
Executive Officer (Human Resources & Corporate Services)
|
|
|
48
|
|
Tito Botelho Martins
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Executive Officer (Non-Ferrous Minerals)
|
|
|
47
|
|
Below is a summary of the business experience, activities and
areas of expertise of our current executive officers.
Roger Agnelli, 50: Chief Executive Officer of
Vale since July 2001.
Other current director or officer
positions: Member of the Board of Directors of
ABB Ltd since 2002 and member of Anadarkos Global Advisory
Board since 2009.
Professional experience: Chairman of our Board
of Directors from May 2000 until July 2001; president and chief
executive officer of Bradespar from March 2000 to July 2001;
executive director of Banco Bradesco from 1998 until 2000;
member of the International Advisory Committee of the NYSE;
Vice-President of the center of industries of the state of Rio
de Janeiro; member of the Strategic Superior Council of the
Federation of Industries of the State of São Paulo
(FIESP); member of the Private Sector Advisory
Council (CONEX) of the foreign trade chamber of the
presidency of Brazil; member of the International Advisory
Investment Council to the president of the Republic of
Mozambique; and member of the Economic and Social Development
Council (CDES), an advisory body to the president of
Brazil from 2003 to 2007. Mr. Agnelli was also a member of
the boards of directors of Companhia Paulista de Força e
Luz, CSN, Latasa S.A., VBC Energia, Brasmotor, Mahle Metal Leve,
Rio Grande Energia, Suzano Petroquímica, Serra da Mesa
Energia, Duke Energy, Spectra Energy and Petrobras, and has been
a director of UGB and vice-president of Brazils National
Association of Investment Banks (ANBID).
Academic background: Degree in Economics from
Fundação Armando Álvares Penteado in São
Paulo.
Carla Grasso, 48: Executive Officer for Human
Resources and Corporate Services of Vale since October 2001.
Professional experience: Member of
Curators Council of Fundação Vale and chief of
personnel, management and information technology at our
corporate center from 1997 to 2001. Previously, Ms. Grasso
was chief of personnel, management and information technology
officer at our corporate center; chairperson of Brazils
Pension Fund Authority; head of the office of international
affairs of the Ministry of Social Welfare of Brazil; head of the
department of fiscal policies of the Ministry of Finance; and
coordinator of the social and macroeconomic areas in the Office
of the President of Brazil. Ms. Grasso has also been a
lecturer of economics and advanced mathematics at the Centro
Universitário do Distrito Federal and the Universidade
Católica de Brasília.
Academic background: Degree in Economics from
the Universidade de Brasília (UNB); Masters degree in
Economic Policies; and executive education programs at INSEAD
(France), IMD (Switzerland) and Sloan School of Management, MIT
(United States).
Eduardo de Salles Bartolomeo, 46: Executive
Officer of Logistics, Projects Management and Sustainability of
Vale since January 2007.
Other current director or officer
positions: Member of the Board of Directors of
Log-in since 2007.
119
Professional experience: President of
Petroflex from August to December 2006; officer of our logistics
operations department between January 2004 and July 2006;
manager of corporate planning, plant manager, corporate
logistics manager and regional director at Americas Brewery Co.
(AMBEV) from 1994 to 2003; and head of the steel
conversion sector at COSIPA until 1991.
Academic background: Degree in Metallurgical
Engineering from the Universidade Federal Fluminense and MBA
from the Katholieke Universiteit in Leuven, Belgium.
Fabio de Oliveira Barbosa, 49: Chief Financial
Officer of Vale since May 2002.
Other current director or officer
positions: Member of the Board of Directors of
BM&F Bovespa since 2009 and member of the International
Advisory Board of Fundação Dom Cabral.
Professional experience: Member of the Board
of Directors of Vale from April 2000 to March 2002; secretary of
the National Treasury at the Ministry of Finance of Brazil from
July 1999 to April 2002; assistant secretary of the National
Treasury from 1995 to 1999; advisor to the Executive Board of
Directors of the World Bank, Washington D.C., from 1992 to 1995.
Previously, Mr. Barbosa was chairman of the Board of
Directors of CAEMI, Banco do Estado de São Paulo S.A., and
a board member of Banco do Brasil, Caixa Econômica Federal,
Companhia Siderúrgica de Tubarão and
Telecomunicações de São Paulo
(TELESP).
Academic background: Degree in Economics from
the Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais; Masters degree
in Economics (all but dissertation), Universidade de Brasilia
(UnB); and executive education programs at INSEAD
(France), IMD (Switzerland), Sloan School of Management, MIT
(United States), and financial programming and policy at the
International Monetary Fund.
José Carlos Martins, 60: Executive
Officer for Ferrous Minerals of Vale since April 2005.
Other current director or officer
positions: Member of the Board of Directors of
Samarco Mineração S.A.
Professional experience: Executive officer of
Vale for new business development from April 2004 to March 2005;
formerly, president of Rexam in South America for aluminum can
production and marketing; president of Latasa from 1999 until
Rexam UK bought Latasa in 2003; executive officer for steel
production of CSN from 1997 until 1999; and Chief Executive
Officer at Aços Villares, where Mr. Martins held
several important positions from 1986 until 1996.
Academic background: Degree in Economics from
Pontifícia Universidade Católica in São Paulo.
Tito Botelho Martins, 47: Executive Officer
for Non-Ferrous Minerals of Vale since 2006; President and Chief
Executive Officer of Vale Inco; and Chairman of the boards of
directors of MRN, Alunorte and Albras.
Professional experience: Executive officer of
Vale for corporate affairs and energy; chief executive officer
of CAEMI and chairman and chief executive officer of MBR from
2003 to 2006; and managing officer of the corporate finance
department of Vale from August 1999 to September 2003.
Previously, Mr. Martins was a member of the boards of
directors of Fundação Vale do Rio Doce de Seguridade
Social (Valia), FCA, Samarco Mineração
S.A., FERROBAN Ferrovias Bandeirantes S.A.,
Aço Minas Gerais S.A. (Açominas), Gulf
Industrial Investment Company (GIIC) in Bahrain,
Itabrasco and Hispanobrás.
Academic Background: Degree in Economics from
the Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais; Masters degree
in management from the Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro;
and executive education programs at INSEAD (France) and at the
Kellogg School of Management of Northwestern University (United
States).
120
Conflicts
of interest
Under Brazilian corporate law, if a director or an executive
officer has a conflict of interest with the company in
connection with any proposed transaction, the director or
executive officer may not vote in any decision of the board of
directors or of the board of executive officers regarding such
transaction and must disclose the nature and extent of the
conflicting interest for transcription in the minutes of the
meeting. In any case, a director or an executive officer may not
transact any business with the company, except on reasonable or
fair terms and conditions that are identical to the terms and
conditions prevailing in the market or offered by unrelated
parties.
Fiscal
Council
We have a fiscal council established in accordance with
Brazilian law. The primary responsibility of the fiscal council
under Brazilian corporate law is to monitor managements
activities, review the companys financial statements, and
report its findings to the shareholders. Pursuant to a written
policy, our Fiscal Council requires management to obtain the
Fiscal Councils approval before engaging any external
auditor to provide any audit or permitted non-audit services to
Vale or its consolidated subsidiaries. Under the policy, the
Fiscal Council has pre-approved a detailed list of services
based on detailed proposals from our auditors up to specified
monetary limits. The list of pre approved services is updated
periodically. Services that are not listed, that exceed the
specified limits, or that relate to internal controls must be
separately pre-approved by the Fiscal Council. The policy also
sets forth a list of prohibited services. The Fiscal Council is
provided with reports on the services provided under the policy
on a periodic basis. It has the power to suspend the payment of
compensation to the independent auditors and to resolve
disagreements between management and the auditors regarding
financial reporting.
Under our bylaws, our Fiscal Council is also responsible for
establishing procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment
of any complaints related to accounting, controls and audit
issues, as well as procedures for the confidential, anonymous
submission of concerns regarding such matters.
Brazilian law requires the members of a fiscal council to meet
certain eligibility requirements. A member of our Fiscal Council
cannot (i) hold office as a member of the board of
directors, fiscal council or advisory committee of any company
that competes with Vale or otherwise has a conflicting interest
with Vale, unless compliance with this requirement is expressly
waived by shareholder vote, (ii) be an employee or member
of the management of Vale or its subsidiaries or affiliates, or
(iii) be a spouse or relative within the third degree by
affinity or consanguinity of an officer or director of Vale.
We are required by both the SEC and the NYSE listed company
audit committee rules to comply with Exchange Act
Rule 10A-3,
which requires, absent an exemption, a standing audit committee
composed of members of the Board of Directors that meet
specified requirements. In lieu of establishing an independent
audit committee, we have given our Fiscal Council the necessary
powers to qualify for the exemption set forth in Exchange Act
Rule 10A-3(c)(3).
We believe our Fiscal Council satisfies the independence and
other requirements of Exchange Act
Rule 10A-3
that would apply in the absence of our reliance on the exemption.
Our Board of Directors has determined that one of the members of
our Fiscal Council, Mr. Aníbal Moreira dos Santos, is
an audit committee financial expert. In addition,
Mr. Moreira dos Santos meets the applicable independence
requirements for Fiscal Council membership under Brazilian law
and the NYSE independence requirements that would apply to audit
committee members in the absence of our reliance on the
exemption set forth in Exchange Act
Rule 10A-3(c)(3).
Members of the Fiscal Council are elected by our shareholders
for one-year terms. The current members of the Fiscal Council
and their respective alternates were elected on April 27,
2010. The terms of the members of the Fiscal Council expire at
the next annual shareholders meeting following election.
121
Two members of our Fiscal Council (and the respective
alternates) may be elected by non-controlling shareholders: one
member may be appointed by our preferred shareholders and one
member may be appointed by minority holders of common shares
comprising at least 10% of the common shares outstanding.
The following table lists the current and alternate members of
the Fiscal Council.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current member
|
|
First year of appointment
|
|
Alternate
|
|
First year of appointment
|
|
Nelson Machado(1)
|
|
2010
|
|
Marcus Pereira Aucélio(1)
|
|
2008
|
Antonio José de Figueiredo Ferreira(2)
|
|
2008
|
|
Cícero da Silva(2)
|
|
2009
|
Marcelo Amaral Moraes(2)
|
|
2004
|
|
Oswaldo Mário Pêgo de Amorim Azevedo(2)
|
|
2004
|
Aníbal Moreira dos Santos(2)
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Appointed by preferred shareholders.
|
(2)
|
|
Appointed by Valepar.
|
Below is a summary of the business experience, activities and
areas of expertise of the members of our Fiscal Council.
Nelson Machado, 62: Member of the Fiscal
Council since 2010 and Executive Secretary of the Ministry of
Finance since 2007.
Other current director or officer
positions: Member of the Board of Directors of
Caixa Econômica Federal (CAIXA) and member of
the Board of Directors of Brasilprev Seguros e Previdência
S.A. (BRASILPREV).
Professional experience: Minister of Social
Security from 2005 to 2007; executive secretary from 2003 to
2005 and interim minister from 2004 to 2005 of the Ministry of
Planning, Budget and Management; member of the Board of
Directors of Brasilcap Capitalização S.A.
(BRASILCAP) from 2007 to 2010.
Academic background: Ph.D. in Accounting and
Controlling from FEA/USP.
Antonio José de Figueiredo Ferreira,
55: Member of the Fiscal Council since April 2008.
Professional experience: Chairman of our
accounting committee from May 2005 until April 2008. Internal
auditing chief of Previ from 1996 to May 2007. Mr. Ferreira
worked for Banco do Brasil for 32 years, where he held
positions in the audit and information technology areas.
Academic background: Degree in Mechanical
Engineering from the Universidade Estadual do Rio de Janeiro;
Law degree from the Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro; MBA
in internal auditing at the Universidade de São Paulo
(USP); MBA in Finance and Corporate Law at Fundação
Getúlio Vargas (FGV) in Rio de Janeiro; and certificate
from the executive education program in Management and Private
Pension Programs from the Wharton School of the University of
Pennsylvania (United States).
Marcelo Amaral Moraes, 42: Member of the
Fiscal Council since 2004 and Director for specialized funds of
Grupo Stratus.
Professional experience: Investment manager at
Bradespar for six years; worked in the mergers and acquisitions
and capital markets departments of Banco Bozano, Simonsen from
1995 to 2000; alternate member of the Board of Directors of Net
Serviços S.A. in 2004; alternate member of our Board of
Directors in 2003.
Academic background: Degree in Economics from
the Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro and an MBA from the
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro/COPPEAD.
122
Aníbal Moreira dos Santos, 71: Member of
the Fiscal Council since 2005 and of the Fiscal Council of
Log-In Logística Intermodal S.A. since April 2009.
Professional experience: From 1998 until his
retirement in 2003, served as executive officer of several CAEMI
subsidiaries, including: Caemi Canada Inc., Caemi Canada
Investments Inc., CMM Overseas, Ltd., Caemi International
Holdings BV and Caemi International Investments NV; member of
the Fiscal Council of CADAM S.A. from 1999 to 2003; and an
alternate member of the Board of Directors of MBR and EBM from
1998 to 2003; chief accounting officer of CAEMI from 1983 to
2003.
Academic background: Degree in Accounting from
Fundação Getúlio Vargas, Rio de Janeiro.
MANAGEMENT
COMPENSATION
Under our bylaws, our shareholders are responsible for
establishing the aggregate compensation we pay to the members of
our Board of Directors and our Board of Executive Officers, and
the Board of Directors allocates the compensation among its
members and the Board of Executive Officers.
Our shareholders determine this annual aggregate compensation at
the general shareholders meeting each year. In order to
establish aggregate director and officer compensation, our
shareholders usually take into account various factors, which
range from attributes, experience and skills of our directors
and executive officers to the recent performance of our
operations. Once aggregate compensation is established, the
members of our Board of Directors are then responsible for
distributing such aggregate compensation in compliance with our
bylaws among the directors and executive officers, in the latter
case, at the recommendation of the Chief Executive Officer. The
Executive Development Committee of our Board of Directors makes
recommendations to the Board concerning the annual aggregate
compensation of the executive officers. In addition to fixed
compensation, our executive officers are also eligible for
bonuses and incentive payments.
For the year ended December 31, 2009, we paid
US$19 million in aggregate to the executive officers, of
which US$7 million was fixed compensation and
US$12 million was variable compensation and benefits in
kind granted, and US$1 million in aggregate to the members
of our Board of Directors for services in all capacities, all of
which was fixed compensation. The amounts accrued to provide
pension, retirement or similar benefits for our executive
officers was US$0.6 million. There are no similar benefits
for the members of our Board of Directors.
As of March 31, 2010, the total number of common shares
owned by our directors and executive officers was 141,307, and
the total number of preferred shares owned by our directors and
executive officers was 1,197,075. None of our directors or
executive officers beneficially owns 1% or more of any class of
our shares.
Fiscal
Council
We paid an aggregate of US$413,000 to members of the Fiscal
Council in 2009. In addition, the members of the Fiscal Council
are reimbursed for travel expenses related to the performance of
their functions.
Advisory
committees
We paid an aggregate of US$135,000 to members of our advisory
committees in 2009. Under Article 15 of our bylaws, those
members who are directors or officers of Vale are not entitled
to additional compensation for participating on a committee.
Members of our advisory committees are reimbursed for travel
expenses related to the performance of their functions.
123
EMPLOYEES
The following table sets forth the number of our employees by
category as of the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Ferrous minerals
|
|
|
21,700
|
|
|
|
23,859
|
|
|
|
24,176
|
|
Logistics services
|
|
|
11,679
|
|
|
|
13,049
|
|
|
|
13,455
|
|
Non-ferrous minerals
|
|
|
20,955
|
|
|
|
22,902
|
|
|
|
19,728
|
|
Administrative
|
|
|
2,709
|
|
|
|
2,680
|
|
|
|
2,677
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
57,043
|
|
|
|
62,490
|
|
|
|
60,036
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We negotiate wages and benefits with a large number of unions
worldwide that represent our employees. We have collective
agreements with unionized employees at our Australian,
Brazilian, Canadian, Indonesian, New Caledonian and U.K.
operations.
Some of our Canadian nickel operations have been facing strikes
since mid-2009. Unionized employees at our operations in Sudbury
and Port Colborne, in the province of Ontario, and at Voisey
Bay, in the province of Newfoundland and Labrador, went on
strike in July and August 2009, respectively, after rejecting
our settlement offer for a new three-year collective bargaining
agreement. Our offer aims to provide the right incentives for
increasing labor productivity and enhancing the long-term
competitiveness of these operations and their capacity to
continue generating value. On March 31, 2009, members of
USW Local
2020-005,
which represents office, technical and professional employees,
ratified a new three-year collective agreement with us. This
agreement includes increases to salaries in each of the three
years, a defined contribution pension plan for new employees and
the introduction of an annual incentive plan that supports the
achievement of strategic objectives and rewards performance and
various other improvements to collective agreement language.
Wages and
benefits
Wages and benefits for Vale and its subsidiaries are generally
established on a
company-by-company
basis. Vale establishes its wage and benefits programs for Vale
and its subsidiaries, other than Vale Inco, in periodic
negotiations with unions. In November 2009, Vale reached a
two-year agreement with the Brazilian unions, which is valid
until November 2011. A salary increase of 7% was implemented in
November 2009 for our employees in Brazil as part of a two-year
agreement reached in 2009. The provisions of Vales
collective bargaining agreements with its unions also apply to
Vales non-unionized employees. Vale Inco establishes wages
and benefits for its unionized employees through collective
agreements. For non-unionized employees, Vale Inco undertakes an
annual review of salaries. Vale and its subsidiaries provide
their employees and their dependents with other benefits,
including supplementary medical assistance.
Pension
plans
Brazilian employees of Vale and of most of its Brazilian
subsidiaries are eligible to participate in pension plans
managed by Fundação Vale do Rio Doce de Seguridade
Social (Valia). Sponsored by Vale and such
subsidiaries, Valia is a closed, nonprofit, complementary social
security foundation with financial and administrative autonomy.
Most of the participants in plans held by Valia are participants
in a plan named Vale Mais, which Valia implemented
in May 2000. This plan is primarily a defined contribution plan
with a defined benefit feature relating to service prior to May
2000 and another defined benefit feature to cover temporary or
permanent disability, pension and financial protection to
dependents in case of death. Valia also operates a defined
benefit plan, closed to new participants since May 2000, with
benefits based on years of service, salary and social security
benefits. This plan covers retired participants and their
beneficiaries, as well as a relatively small number of employees
that declined to transfer from the old plan to the Vale
Mais plan when it was established in May 2000. Employees
of our subsidiaries Albras and Alunorte participate in different
124
pension plans maintained by Bradesco Vida e Previdência
S.A. This plan is closed to new participants and will not be
sponsored by Albras and Alunorte in the future. Since April
2010, Albras and Alunorte employees are eligible for ValiaPrevi,
another plan managed by Valia.
Our wholly owned subsidiary Vale Inco sponsors defined benefit
pension plans principally in Canada, the United States, the
United Kingdom and Indonesia. Each of the jurisdictions in which
these plans is offered has legislation which, among other
statutory requirements, cover minimum contributions to be made
to these plans to meet their potential liabilities as calculated
in accordance with such legislation. Effective January 1,
2009 the defined benefit plan for non-unionized staff employees
in Canada was closed to new participants. A defined contribution
plan was introduced for new employees effective July 1,
2009, and existing employees will have the opportunity to elect
to move from the defined benefit to the defined contribution
plan effective January 1, 2010. Vale Incos
subsidiary, Vale Inco Newfoundland and Labrador Limited, has a
defined contribution pension plan. In addition, Vale Inco
provides supplemental retirement benefits arrangements for
eligible employees.
Performance-based
compensation
All Vale parent-company employees receive incentive compensation
each year in an amount based on the performance of Vale, the
performance of the employees department and the
performance of the individual employee. Similar incentive
compensation arrangements are in place at our subsidiaries.
Certain Vale employees also receive deferred bonuses with
vesting periods of three years based on Vales performance
as measured by total shareholder return relative to a group of
peer companies over the vesting period. Since 2008, qualifying
management personnel are eligible to participate in a bonus
program tied to share ownership. Under the program, an employee
may elect to invest part of his bonus in Vale shares. If the
employee continues to be employed by us and to hold all the
shares, after three years the employee will receive an
additional bonus payment sufficient to purchase for his account,
in the open market, a number of additional shares equal to the
number of shares the employee purchased under the program. In
2010 and 2009, 1,200 employees elected to participate in
the program.
|
|
V.
|
ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION
|
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
We and our subsidiaries are defendants in numerous legal actions
in the normal course of business, including civil,
administrative, tax, social security and labor proceedings. See
Note 20 to our consolidated financial statements.
Praia
Mole suit
We were a defendant in a public civil action seeking to annul
the concession agreement through which we and certain other
defendants operate the Praia Mole maritime terminal in the
Brazilian state of Espírito Santo. This case was decided in
our favor in November 2007, but the plaintiff filed an appeal
with the federal circuit court in April 2008, which is still
pending.
Itabira
suits
We are a defendant in two separate actions brought by the
municipality of Itabira, in the Brazilian state of Minas Gerais.
In one of the actions, filed in August 1996, the municipality of
Itabira alleges that our Itabira iron ore mining operations have
caused environmental and social damages and claims damages with
respect to the degradation of the site of one of our mines, as
well as the immediate restoration of the affected ecological
complex and the performance of compensatory environmental
programs in the region. The damages sought, as
125
adjusted from the date of the claim, amount to
R$2.178 billion (US$1.251 billion). In the other
action, the municipality of Itabira is claiming the right to be
reimbursed for expenses it has incurred in connection with
public services rendered as a consequence of our mining
activities. The damages sought, as adjusted from the date of the
claim, amount to R$2.522 billion (US$1.448 billion).
We believe these suits are without merit.
CFEM-related
proceedings
We are currently a defendant in a series of administrative and
judicial proceedings brought by the National Mineral Production
Department (Departamento Nacional de Produção
Mineral), or DNPM, an agency of the Ministry of Mines and Energy
of the Brazilian government. The most significant of these
proceedings was brought against us in March 2006, alleging that
we have failed to pay the full amount of a mining royalty, known
as the CFEM, on revenues generated by our iron ore and manganese
activities. (For details about the CFEM, see Additional
informationRegulatory mattersRoyalties and
other taxes on mining activities.) We believe that the
DNPMs allegations are without merit. The aggregate amount
claimed in the administrative and judicial proceedings is
R$4.7 billion (US$2.7 billion).
We are a defendant in a judicial proceeding brought in 2002 by
the Municipality of Mariana, alleging that we owe CFEM on our
pelletization activities. We do not believe pelletization
activities are subject to CFEM.
We were also involved in litigation with the DNPM regarding the
applicable CFEM rate for certain potash products. We have
reached an agreement with DNPM to settle this claim.
Tax
litigation
We are engaged in litigation with respect to Article 74 of
the Brazilian Provisional Measure 2,158-34/2001
(Article 74 of the Provisional Measure), a tax
regulation requiring payment of income tax in Brazil on net
income from foreign subsidiaries. In 2003, we initiated a legal
proceeding challenging the applicability of such regulation
based on the following arguments: (i) Article 74 of
the Provisional Measure disregards double taxation treaties
between Brazil and the countries where some of our subsidiaries
are based; (ii) the Brazilian Tax Code prohibits the
establishment of conditions and timing of any tax assessment by
means of a regulation such as Article 74 of the Provisional
Measure; (iii) even if Article 74 of the Provisional
Measure is valid, exchange gain and loss must be excluded from
the net income of our foreign subsidiaries in the calculation of
taxes owed (in accordance with new Brazilian accounting
principles and IFRS); and (iv) the constitutional principle
prohibiting retroactive application of tax laws would be
violated if this regulation were applied to net income generated
before December 2001. We did not obtain a favorable decision on
the merits of the case, but we did obtain an injunction
suspending our obligation to pay the disputed amounts. We
appealed from the lower court decision in July 2005, and the
injunction remains in effect until the resolution of this
appeal. The appeals courts decision on the merits is
suspended until final resolution of a parallel lawsuit filed by
the Brazilian Industry Association challenging the
constitutionality of Article 74 of the Provisional Measure.
Meanwhile, the tax authorities filed two new administrative
proceedings, bringing our total to four, claiming payment of
R$25.567 billion (US$14.694 billion) from us, of which
R$13.153 billion (US$7.559 billion) represents
interest and penalties for non-payment of taxes and
R$12.414 billion (US$7.134 billion) represents unpaid
income tax on the net income from our foreign subsidiaries. We
have filed our answer to these proceedings. We believe the suits
are without merit and are vigorously contesting them. We have
not made any provisions for these claims.
Gold
forward contracts
In 1988 and 1989, we entered into gold forward contracts with
various Brazilian private pension funds. Under the terms of
these contracts, settlement was permitted by either physical
delivery or cash payment. In
126
May 1989, however, the Brazilian government, through the
Brazilian central bank, passed a law prohibiting settlement by
delivery, and Vale was consequently obligated to settle in cash.
During these years, Brazil experienced severe inflation, and
beginning in 2005, some of the pension funds sued Vale, claiming
that the inflation adjustment provided for in the contracts did
not adequately compensate them for monetary losses arising from
the governments measures to control inflation during this
period. There are 11 such suits. We have prevailed in two cases
in the lower court, and the amounts claimed in those cases and
the remaining cases are not material. We have lost in the lower
courts in four cases, and we are pursuing appeals in those
cases. The five remaining cases are still pending decision from
the lower courts (fase probatória). We had
provisions for most of this amount at December 31, 2009.
MEMORANDUM
AND ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION
Company
objectives and purposes
Our corporate purpose is defined by our bylaws to include:
|
|
|
|
|
the exploitation of mineral deposits in Brazil and abroad by
means of research, extraction, processing, industrialization,
transportation, shipment and commerce of mineral goods;
|
|
|
|
the building and operation of railways and the exploitation of
own or unrelated-party rail traffic;
|
|
|
|
the building and operation of our own or unrelated-party
maritime terminals, and the exploitation of nautical activities
for the provision of support within the harbor;
|
|
|
|
the provision of logistics services integrated with cargo
transport, comprising generation, storage, transshipment,
distribution and delivery within the context of a multimodal
transport system;
|
|
|
|
the production, processing, transport, industrialization and
commerce of all and any source and form of energy, also
involving activities of production, generation, transmission,
distribution and commerce of its products, derivatives and sub
products;
|
|
|
|
the carrying-on, in Brazil or abroad, of other activities that
may be of direct or indirect consequence for the achievement of
its corporate purpose, including research, industrialization,
purchase and sale, importation and exportation, the
exploitation, industrialization and commerce of forest resources
and the provision of services of any kind whatsoever; and
|
|
|
|
constituting or participating in any fashion in other companies,
consortia or associations directly or indirectly related to its
business purpose.
|
Common
shares and preferred shares
Set forth below is certain information concerning our authorized
and issued share capital and a brief summary of certain
significant provisions of our bylaws and Brazilian corporate
law. This description does not purport to be complete and is
qualified by reference to our bylaws (an English translation of
which we have filed with the SEC) and to Brazilian corporate law.
Our bylaws authorize the issuance of up to 3.6 billion
common shares and up to 7.2 billion preferred shares, in
each case based solely on the approval of the Board of Directors
without any additional shareholder approval.
Each common share entitles the holder thereof to one vote at
meetings of our shareholders. Holders of common shares are not
entitled to any preference relating to our dividends or other
distributions.
127
Holders of preferred shares and the golden shares are generally
entitled to the same voting rights as holders of common shares,
except with respect to the election of members of the Board of
Directors, and are entitled to a preferential dividend as
described below. Non-controlling shareholders holding common
shares representing at least 15% of our voting capital, and
preferred shares representing at least 10% of our total share
capital, have the right to appoint each one member and an
alternate to our Board of Directors. If no group of common or
preferred shareholders meets the thresholds described above,
shareholders holding preferred or common shares representing at
least 10% of our total share capital are entitled to combine
their holdings to appoint one member and an alternate to our
Board of Directors. Holders of preferred shares, including the
golden shares, may elect one member of the permanent Fiscal
Council and the respective alternate. Non-controlling holders of
common shares comprising at least 10% of the voting shares
outstanding may also elect one member of the Fiscal Council and
an alternate.
The Brazilian government holds 12 golden shares of Vale. The
golden shares are preferred shares that entitle the holder to
the same rights (including with respect to voting and dividend
preference) as holders of preferred shares. In addition, the
holder of the golden shares is entitled to veto any proposed
action relating to the following matters:
|
|
|
|
|
a change in our name;
|
|
|
|
a change in the location of our head office;
|
|
|
|
a change in our corporate purpose as regards mining activities;
|
|
|
|
any liquidation of our company;
|
|
|
|
any disposal or winding up of activities in any of the following
parts of our iron ore mining integrated systems:
|
mineral deposits, ore deposits, mines;
railways; or
ports and maritime terminals;
|
|
|
|
|
any change in the bylaws relating to the rights accorded to the
classes of capital stock issued by us; and
|
|
|
|
any change in the bylaws relating to the rights accorded the
golden shares.
|
Calculation
of distributable amount
At each annual shareholders meeting, the Board of
Directors is required to recommend, based on the executive
officers proposal, how to allocate our earnings for the
preceding fiscal year. For purposes of Brazilian corporate law,
a companys net income after income taxes and social
contribution taxes for such fiscal year, net of any accumulated
losses from prior fiscal years and amounts allocated to
employees and managements participation in earnings
represents its net profits for such fiscal year. In
accordance with Brazilian corporate law, an amount equal to our
net profits, as further reduced by amounts allocated to the
legal reserve, to the fiscal incentive investment reserve, to
the contingency reserve or to the unrealized income reserve
established by us in compliance with applicable law (discussed
below) and increased by reversals of reserves constituted in
prior years, is available for distribution to shareholders in
any given year. Such amount, the adjusted net profits, is
referred to herein as the distributable amount. We may also
establish discretionary reserves, such as reserves for
investment projects.
The Brazilian corporate law provides that all discretionary
allocations of net profits, including discretionary reserves,
the contingency reserve, the unrealized income reserve and the
reserve for investment
128
projects, are subject to approval by the shareholders voting at
the annual meeting and can be transferred to capital or used for
the payment of dividends in subsequent years. The fiscal
incentive investment reserve and legal reserve are also subject
to approval by the shareholders voting at the annual meeting and
may be transferred to capital but are not available for the
payment of dividends in subsequent years.
The sum of certain discretionary reserves may not exceed the
amount of our paid-in capital. When such limit is reached, our
shareholders may vote to use the excess to pay in capital,
increase capital or distribute dividends.
Our calculation of net profits and allocations to reserves for
any fiscal year are determined on the basis of financial
statements prepared in accordance with Brazilian corporate law.
Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with U.S. GAAP and, although our allocations to
reserves and dividends will be reflected in these financial
statements, investors will not be able to calculate such
allocations or required dividend amounts from our consolidated
financial statements.
Mandatory
dividend
The Brazilian corporate law and our bylaws prescribe that we
must distribute to our shareholders in the form of dividends or
interest on shareholders equity an annual amount equal to
not less than 25% of the distributable amount, referred to as
the mandatory dividend, unless the Board of Directors advises
our shareholders at our general shareholders meeting that
payment of the mandatory dividend for the preceding year is
inadvisable in light of our financial condition. To date, our
Board of Directors has never determined that payment of the
mandatory dividend was inadvisable. The Fiscal Council must
review any such determination and report it to the shareholders.
In addition to the mandatory dividend, our Board of Directors
may recommend to the shareholders payment of dividends from
other funds legally available therefore. Any payment of interim
dividends will be netted against the amount of the mandatory
dividend for that fiscal year. The shareholders must also
approve the recommendation of the Board of Directors with
respect to any required distribution. The amount of the
mandatory dividend is subject to the size of the legal reserve,
the contingency reserve, and the unrealized income reserve. The
amount of the mandatory dividend is not subject to the size of
the discretionary depletion reserve. SeeCalculation of
distributable amount.
Dividend
preference of preferred shares
Pursuant to our bylaws, holders of preferred shares and the
golden shares are entitled to a minimum annual non-cumulative
preferential dividend equal to (i) at least 3% of the book
value per share, calculated in accordance with the financial
statements which serve as reference for the payment of
dividends, or (ii) 6% of their pro rata share of our
paid-in capital, whichever is higher. To the extent that we
declare dividends in any particular year in amounts which exceed
the preferential dividends on preferred shares, and after
holders of common shares have received distributions equivalent,
on a per share basis, to the preferential dividends on preferred
shares, holders of common shares and preferred shares shall
receive the same additional dividend amount per share. Since the
first step of our privatization in 1997, we have had sufficient
distributable amounts to be able to distribute equal amounts to
both common and preferred shareholders.
Other
matters relating to our preferred shares
Our bylaws do not provide for the conversion of preferred shares
into common shares. In addition, the preferred shares do not
have any preference upon our liquidation and there are no
redemption provisions associated with the preferred shares.
Distributions
classified as shareholders equity
Brazilian companies are permitted to pay limited amounts to
shareholders and treat such payments as an expense for Brazilian
income tax purposes. Our bylaws provide for the distribution of
interest on shareholders equity as an alternative form of
payment to shareholders. The interest rate applied is limited to
the Brazilian long-term interest rate, or TJLP, for the
applicable period. The deduction of the amount of interest paid
cannot
129
exceed the greater of (1) 50% of net income (after the
deduction of the provision of social contribution on net profits
and before the deduction of the provision of the corporate
income tax) before taking into account any such distribution for
the period in respect of which the payment is made or
(2) 50% of the sum of retained earnings and profit
reserves. Any payment of interest on shareholders equity
is subject to Brazilian withholding income tax. See
Additional informationTaxation. Under our
bylaws, the amount paid to shareholders as interest on
shareholders equity (net of any withholding tax) may be
included as part of any mandatory and minimum dividend. Under
Brazilian corporate law, we are obligated to distribute to
shareholders an amount sufficient to ensure that the net amount
received, after payment by us of applicable Brazilian
withholding taxes in respect of the distribution of interest on
shareholders equity, is at least equal to the mandatory
dividend.
Mandatorily
convertible notes
In 2009, our wholly owned subsidiary Vale Capital II issued
mandatorily convertible notes in two series, both due
June 15, 2012. The
series VALE-2012
notes (US$293 million principal amount) are mandatorily
convertible into ADSs representing an aggregate maximum of
18,415,859 common shares. The
series VALE.P-2012
notes (US$649 million principal amount) are mandatorily
convertible into ADSs representing an aggregate maximum of
47,284,800 preferred shares.
In 2007, our wholly owned subsidiary Vale Capital Limited issued
mandatorily convertible notes in two series, both due
June 15, 2010. The series RIO notes
(US$1.296 billion principal amount) are mandatorily
convertible into ADSs representing an aggregate maximum of
56,582,040 common shares. The series RIO P notes
(US$584 million principal amount) are mandatorily
convertible into ADSs representing an aggregate maximum of
30,295,456 preferred shares.
The mandatorily convertible notes of Vale Capital Limited and
Vale Capital II can convert before maturity under specified
circumstances. The conversion rate for all series will depend on
the market price of the ADSs on the conversion date. Under the
indentures governing the notes, additional remuneration is due
to each noteholder in an amount in U.S. dollars equal to
any cash distribution net of any applicable withholding tax and
fees paid by the Depositary of our ADSs to the holder of one
ADS, multiplied by the number of ADSs that would be received by
the noteholder upon conversion of the notes at the conversion
rate specified in the applicable indenture.
Voting
rights
Each common share entitles the holder thereof to one vote at
meetings of our shareholders. Holders of preferred shares are
entitled to the same voting rights as holders of common shares
except that they may not vote on the election of members of the
Board of Directors, except in the event of dividend arrearages,
as described below. One of the members of the permanent Fiscal
Council and his or her alternate are elected by majority vote of
the holders of preferred shares. Holders of preferred shares and
common shares may, in certain circumstances, combine their
respective holdings to elect members of our Board of Directors,
as described underCommon shares and preferred
shares.
The golden shares entitle the holder thereof to the same voting
rights as holders of preferred shares. The golden shares also
confer certain other significant voting rights in respect of
particular actions, as described underCommon shares and
preferred shares.
The Brazilian corporate law provides that non-voting or
restricted-voting shares, such as the preferred shares, acquire
unrestricted voting rights beginning when a company has failed
for three consecutive fiscal years (or for any shorter period
set forth in a companys constituent documents) to pay any
fixed or minimum dividend to which such shares are entitled and
continuing until payment thereof is made. Our bylaws do not set
forth any such shorter period.
Any change in the preferences or advantages of our preferred
shares, or the creation of a class of shares having priority
over the preferred shares, would require the approval of the
holder of the golden shares,
130
who can veto such matters, as well as the approval of the
holders of a majority of the outstanding preferred shares,
voting as a class at a special meeting.
Shareholders
meetings
A general shareholders meeting convenes each year to
decide all matters relating to our corporate purposes and to
pass such resolutions as they deem necessary for our protection
and well being.
Pursuant to Brazilian corporate law, shareholders voting at a
general shareholders meeting have the power, among other
powers, to:
|
|
|
|
|
amend the bylaws;
|
|
|
|
elect or dismiss members of the Board of Directors and members
of the Fiscal Council at any time;
|
|
|
|
establish the remuneration of senior management and members of
the Fiscal Council;
|
|
|
|
receive annual reports by management and accept or reject
managements financial statements and recommendations
including the allocation of net profits and the distributable
amount for payment of the mandatory dividend and allocation to
the various reserve accounts;
|
|
|
|
authorize the issuance of convertible and secured debentures;
|
|
|
|
suspend the rights of a shareholder in default of obligations
established by law or by the bylaws;
|
|
|
|
accept or reject the valuation of assets contributed by a
shareholder in consideration for issuance of capital stock;
|
|
|
|
pass resolutions to reorganize our legal form, to merge,
consolidate or split us, to dissolve and liquidate us, to elect
and dismiss our liquidators and to examine their
accounts; and
|
|
|
|
authorize management to file for bankruptcy or to request a
concordata.
|
All shareholders meetings, including the annual
shareholders meeting, are convened by publishing, no fewer
than 15 days prior to the scheduled meeting date and no
fewer than three times, a notice in the Diário Oficial
do Estado do Rio de Janeiro and in a newspaper with general
circulation in the city where we have our registered office, in
Rio de Janeiro. Our shareholders have previously designated
Jornal do Commercio for this purpose. Also, because our
shares are traded on the BM&FBOVESPA, we must publish a
notice in a São Paulo based newspaper. Such notice must
contain the agenda for the meeting and, in the case of an
amendment to our bylaws, an indication of the subject matter. In
addition, under our bylaws, the holder of the golden shares is
entitled to a minimum of 15 days prior formal notice to its
legal representative of any general shareholders meeting
to consider any proposed action subject to the veto rights
accorded to the golden shares. See Common shares
and preferred shares.
A shareholders meeting may be held if shareholders
representing at least one-quarter of the voting capital are
present, except for meetings convened to amend our bylaws, which
require a quorum of at least two-thirds of the voting capital.
If no such quorum is present, notice must again be given in the
same manner as described above except for the
eight-days
prior notice, and a meeting may then be convened without any
specific quorum requirement, subject to the minimum quorum and
voting requirements for certain matters, as discussed below. A
shareholder without a right to vote may attend a general
shareholders meeting and take part in the discussion of
matters submitted for consideration.
Except as otherwise provided by law, resolutions of a
shareholders meeting are passed by a simple majority vote,
abstentions not being taken into account. Under Brazilian
corporate law, the approval of shareholders representing at
least one-half of the issued and outstanding voting shares is
required for the types
131
of action described below, as well as, in the case of
clause (a) and clause (b), a majority of issued and
outstanding shares of the affected class:
|
|
|
|
|
creating a new class of preferred shares or disproportionately
increasing an existing class of preferred shares relative to the
other classes of shares, other than to the extent permitted by
the bylaws;
|
|
|
|
changing a priority, preference, right, privilege or condition
of redemption or amortization of any class of preferred shares
or creating any class of non-voting preferred shares that has a
priority, preference, right, condition or redemption or
amortization superior to an existing class of shares, such as
the preferred shares;
|
|
|
|
reducing the mandatory dividend;
|
|
|
|
changing the corporate purposes;
|
|
|
|
merging us with another company or consolidating or splitting us;
|
|
|
|
dissolving or liquidating us;
|
|
|
|
participating in a centralized group of companies as defined
under Brazilian corporate law; and
|
|
|
|
canceling any ongoing liquidation of us.
|
Whenever the shares of any class of capital stock are entitled
to vote, each share is entitled to one vote. Annual
shareholders meetings must be held by April 30 of each
year. Shareholders meetings are called, convened and
presided over by the chairman or by the vice-chairman of our
Board of Directors. In the case of temporary absence or
impediment of the Chairman or Vice-Chairman of the Board of
Directors, the shareholders meetings may be chaired by
their respective alternates, or in the absence or impediment of
such alternates, by a director especially appointed by the
Chairman of the Board of Directors. A shareholder may be
represented at a general shareholders meeting by an
attorney-in-fact appointed not more than one year before the
meeting, who must be a shareholder, a company officer or a
lawyer. For a public company, such as us, the attorney-in-fact
may also be a financial institution.
Redemption
rights
Our common shares and preferred shares are not redeemable,
except that a dissenting shareholder is entitled under Brazilian
corporate law to obtain redemption upon a decision made at a
shareholders meeting by shareholders representing at least
50% of the voting shares:
|
|
|
|
|
to create a new class of preferred shares or to
disproportionately increase an existing class of preferred
shares relative to the other classes of shares (unless such
actions are provided for or authorized by the bylaws);
|
|
|
|
to modify a preference, privilege or condition of redemption or
amortization conferred on one or more classes of preferred
shares, or to create a new class with greater privileges than
the existing classes of preferred shares;
|
|
|
|
to reduce the mandatory distribution of dividends;
|
|
|
|
to change our corporate purposes;
|
|
|
|
to merge us with another company, consolidate or split us;
|
132
|
|
|
|
(6)
|
to transfer all of our shares to another company in order to
make us a wholly owned subsidiary of such company, a stock
merger;
|
|
|
(7)
|
to approve the acquisition of control of another company at a
price which exceeds certain limits set forth in Brazilian
corporate law;
|
|
|
(5)
|
to approve our participation in a centralized group of companies
as defined under Brazilian corporate law; or
|
|
|
(6)
|
in the event that the entity resulting from (a) a merger,
(b) a stock merger as described in clause (6) above or
(c) a spin-off that we conduct fails to become a listed
company within 120 days of the general shareholders
meeting at which such decision was taken.
|
Only holders of shares adversely affected by the changes
mentioned in items (1) and (2) above may require us to
redeem their shares. The right of redemption mentioned in items
(5), (6) and (8) above may only be exercised if our
shares do not satisfy certain tests of liquidity, among others,
at the time of the shareholder resolution. The right of
redemption lapses 30 days after publication of the minutes
of the relevant general shareholders meeting, unless, in
the case of items (1) and (2) above, the resolution is
subject to confirmation by the preferred shareholders (which
must be made at a special meeting to be held within one year),
in which case the
30-day term
is counted from the publication of the minutes of the special
meeting.
We would be entitled to reconsider any action giving rise to
redemption rights within 10 days following the expiration
of such rights if the redemption of shares of dissenting
shareholders would jeopardize our financial stability. Any
redemption pursuant to Brazilian corporate law would be made at
no less than the book value per share, determined on the basis
of the last balance sheet approved by the shareholders; provided
that if the general shareholders meeting giving rise to
redemption rights occurred more than 60 days after the date
of the last approved balance sheet, a shareholder would be
entitled to demand that his or her shares be valued on the basis
of a new balance sheet dated within 60 days of such general
shareholders meeting.
Preemptive
rights
Each of our shareholders has a general preemptive right to
subscribe for shares in any capital increase, in proportion to
his or her shareholding. A minimum period of 30 days
following the publication of notice of a capital increase is
assured for the exercise of the right, and the right is
transferable. Under our bylaws and Brazilian corporate law, our
Board of Directors may decide not to extend preemptive rights to
our shareholders, or to reduce the
30-day
period for the exercise of preemptive rights, in each case with
respect to any issuance of shares, debentures convertible into
shares or warrants in the context of a public offering, subject
to the limit on the number of shares that may be issued with the
approval of the Board without any additional shareholder
approval. In the event of a capital increase that would maintain
or increase the proportion of capital represented by preferred
shares, holders of preferred shares will have preemptive rights
to subscribe only to newly issued preferred shares. In the event
of a capital increase that would reduce the proportion of
capital represented by preferred shares, shareholders will have
preemptive rights to subscribe for preferred shares, in
proportion to their shareholdings, and for common shares only to
the extent necessary to prevent dilution of their overall
interest in us. In the event of a capital increase that would
maintain or increase the proportion of capital represented by
common shares, shareholders will have preemptive rights to
subscribe only to newly issued common shares. In the event of a
capital increase that would reduce the proportion of capital
represented by common shares, holders of common shares will have
preemptive rights to subscribe for preferred shares only to the
extent necessary to prevent dilution of their overall interest
in us.
Tag-along
rights
According to Brazilian corporate law, in the event of a sale of
control of a company, the acquirer is obliged to offer to
holders of voting shares the right to sell their shares for a
price equal to at least 80% of the price paid for the voting
shares representing control.
133
Form and
transfer
Our preferred shares and common shares are in book-entry form
registered in the name of each shareholder or its nominee. The
transfer of such shares is made under Brazilian corporate law,
which provides that a transfer of shares is effected by our
transfer agent, Banco Bradesco S.A., upon presentation of valid
share transfer instructions to us by a transferor or its
representative. When preferred shares or common shares are
acquired or sold on a Brazilian stock exchange, the transfer is
effected on the records of our transfer agent by a
representative of a brokerage firm or the stock exchanges
clearing system. Transfers of shares by a foreign investor are
made in the same way and are executed by the investors
local agent, who is also responsible for updating the
information relating to the foreign investment furnished to the
Central Bank.
The BM&FBOVESPA operates a central clearing system through
Companhia Brasileira de Liquidação e
Custódia, or CBLC. A holder of our shares may
participate in this system and all shares elected to be put into
the system will be deposited in custody with CBLC (through a
Brazilian institution that is duly authorized to operate by the
Central Bank and maintains a clearing account with CBLC). The
fact that such shares are subject to custody with the relevant
stock exchange will be reflected in our registry of
shareholders. Each participating shareholder will, in turn, be
registered in the register of our beneficial shareholders that
is maintained by CBLC and will be treated in the same way as
registered shareholders.
EXCHANGE
CONTROLS AND OTHER LIMITATIONS
AFFECTING SECURITY HOLDERS
There are no restrictions on ownership of our capital stock by
individuals or legal entities domiciled outside Brazil. However,
the right to convert dividend payments and proceeds from the
sale of preferred shares or common shares into foreign currency
and to remit such amounts outside Brazil is subject to
restrictions under foreign investment legislation which
generally requires, among other things, that the relevant
investment be registered with the Central Bank of Brazil. These
restrictions on the remittance of foreign capital abroad could
hinder or prevent the custodian for the preferred shares or
common shares represented by ADSs, or holders who have exchanged
ADSs for preferred shares or common shares, from converting
dividends, distributions or the proceeds from any sale of
preferred shares or common shares, as the case may be, into
U.S. dollars and remitting such U.S. dollars abroad.
Delays in, or refusal to grant any required government approval
for conversions of Brazilian currency payments and remittances
abroad of amounts owed to holders of ADSs could adversely affect
holders of ADRs.
Under Resolution No. 2,689/2000, foreign investors may
invest in almost all financial assets and engage in almost all
transactions available in the Brazilian financial and capital
markets, provided that certain requirements are fulfilled. In
accordance with Resolution No. 2,689/2000, the definition
of foreign investor includes individuals, legal entities, mutual
funds and other collective investment entities, domiciled or
headquartered outside Brazil.
Under Resolution No. 2,689/2000, a foreign investor must:
|
|
|
|
|
appoint at least one representative in Brazil, with powers to
perform actions relating to its investment,
|
|
|
|
complete the appropriate foreign investor registration form,
|
|
|
|
register as a foreign investor with the CVM, and
|
|
|
|
register its foreign investment with the Central Bank.
|
Securities and other financial assets held by foreign investors
pursuant to Resolution No. 2,689/2000 must be registered or
maintained in deposit accounts or under the custody of an entity
duly licensed by the Central Bank or the CVM. In addition,
securities trading is restricted to transactions carried out on
stock
134
exchanges or through organized
over-the-counter
markets licensed by the CVM, except for subscription,
bonification, conversion of debentures into shares, securities
indexes, purchase and sale of investment funds quotas and, if
permitted by the CVM, going-private transactions, canceling or
suspension of trading. Moreover, the offshore transfer or
assignment of the securities or other financial assets held by
foreign investors pursuant to Resolution No. 2,689/2000 is
prohibited, except for transfers resulting from a corporate
reorganization, or occurring upon the death of an investor by
operation of law or will.
Resolution No. 1,927/1992 of the National Monetary Council
provides for the issuance of depositary receipts in foreign
markets in respect of shares of Brazilian issuers. It provides
that the proceeds from the sale of ADSs by holders of ADRs
outside Brazil are free of Brazilian foreign investment controls
and holders of ADSs who are not resident in a tax haven
jurisdiction (i.e., a country or location that does not
impose taxes on income or where the maximum income tax rate is
lower than 20%, or where the legislation imposes restrictions on
disclosure of the shareholding composition or the ownership of
the investment) will be entitled to favorable tax treatment.
An electronic registration has been issued to the custodian in
the name of the depositary with respect to the ADSs. Pursuant to
this electronic registration, the custodian and the depositary
are able to convert dividends and other distributions with
respect to the underlying shares into foreign currency and to
remit the proceeds outside Brazil. If a holder exchanges ADSs
for preferred shares or common shares, the holder may continue
to rely on the custodians electronic registration for only
five business days after the exchange. After that, the holder
must seek to obtain its own electronic registration with the
Central Bank under Law No. 4,131/1962 or Resolution
No. 2,689/2000. Thereafter, unless the holder has
registered its investment with the Central Bank, such holder may
not convert into foreign currency and remit outside Brazil the
proceeds from the disposition of, or distributions with respect
to, such preferred shares or common shares.
Under Brazilian law, whenever there is a serious imbalance in
Brazils balance of payments or reasons to foresee a
serious imbalance, the Brazilian government may impose temporary
restrictions on the remittance to foreign investors of the
proceeds of their investments in Brazil, and on the conversion
of Brazilian currency into foreign currencies. Such restrictions
may hinder or prevent the custodian or holders who have
exchanged ADSs for underlying preferred shares or common shares
from converting distributions or the proceeds from any sale of
such shares, as the case may be, into U.S. dollars and
remitting such U.S. dollars abroad. In the event the
custodian is prevented from converting and remitting amounts
owed to foreign investors, the custodian will hold the
reais it cannot convert for the account of the holders of
American Depositary Receipts who have not been paid. The
depositary will not invest the reais and will not be
liable for interest on those amounts. Any reais so held
will be subject to devaluation risk against the U.S. dollar.
TAXATION
The following summary contains a description of the principal
Brazilian and U.S. federal income tax consequences of the
ownership and disposition of preferred shares, common shares or
ADSs. You should know that this summary does not purport to be a
comprehensive description of all the tax considerations that may
be relevant to a holder of preferred shares, common shares or
ADSs.
Holders of preferred shares, common shares, or ADSs should
consult their own tax advisors to discuss the tax consequences
of the purchase, ownership and disposition of preferred shares,
common shares or ADSs, including, in particular, the effect of
any state, local or other national tax laws.
Although there is at present no treaty to avoid double taxation
between Brazil and the United States, but only a common
understanding between the two countries according to which
income taxes paid in one may be offset against taxes to be paid
in the other, both countries tax authorities have been
having discussions that may result in the execution of such a
treaty. In this regard, the two countries signed a Tax
Information Exchange Agreement on March 20, 2007. We cannot
predict whether or when such a treaty will enter into force or
how, if entered into, such a treaty will affect the
U.S. holders, as defined below, of preferred shares, common
shares, or ADSs.
135
Brazilian
tax considerations
The following discussion summarizes the principal Brazilian tax
consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of
preferred shares, common shares or ADSs by a holder not deemed
to be domiciled in Brazil for purposes of Brazilian taxation
(Non-Brazilian Holder). It is based on the tax laws
of Brazil and regulations thereunder in effect on the date
hereof, which are subject to change (possibly with retroactive
effect). This discussion does not specifically address all of
the Brazilian tax considerations applicable to any particular
Non-Brazilian Holder. Therefore, each Non-Brazilian Holder
should consult his or her own tax advisor concerning the
Brazilian tax consequences of an investment in preferred shares,
common shares, or ADSs.
Shareholder
distributions
Brazilian corporations, such as us, classify for tax purposes
distributions to shareholders as either dividends or interest on
shareholders equity.
Dividends. Amounts distributed as dividends,
including distributions in kind, will generally not be subject
to income tax withholding if the distribution is paid by us from
profits of periods beginning on or after January 1, 1996
(1) to the depositary in respect of the preferred shares or
common shares underlying the ADSs or (2) to a Non-Brazilian
Holder in respect of preferred shares or common shares.
Dividends paid from profits generated before January 1,
1996 may be subject to Brazilian withholding income tax at
varying rates depending on the year the profits were generated.
Interest on shareholders equity. Amounts
distributed as interest on shareholders equity are
generally subject to income tax withholding at the rate of 15%,
except if:
|
|
|
|
|
the beneficiary is exempt from tax in Brazil, in which case the
distribution is free of Brazilian tax,
|
|
|
|
the beneficiary is located in a Tax Haven Jurisdiction (as
defined below) (a Tax Haven Holder), in which case
the applicable income tax withholding rate is 25%, or
|
|
|
|
the beneficiary is resident in Japan, in which case the
applicable income tax withholding rate is 12.5%.
|
Interest on shareholders equity is calculated as a
percentage of shareholders equity, as stated in the
statutory accounting records. The interest rate applied may not
exceed the TJLP, as determined by the Central Bank of Brazil
from time to time. In addition, the amount of distributions
classified as interest on shareholders equity may not be
more than the greater of (1) 50% of net income (after the
deduction of the provision of social contribution on net profits
but before taking into account such payment of interest and the
provision of corporate income tax) for the period in respect of
which the payment is made, or (2) 50% of the sum of
retained earnings and profit reserves as of the date of the
beginning of the fiscal year in respect of which the payment is
made. Payments of interest on shareholders equity are
deductible for corporate income tax and social contribution on
net profit purposes, to the extent of the limits described
above. Therefore, the benefit to us, as opposed to making a
distribution classified as a dividend payment, is a reduction in
our corporate taxes charge equivalent to 34% of such amount.
Taxation of capital gains. Taxation of
Non-Brazilian Holders for capital gains depends on the status of
the holder as either:
|
|
|
|
|
not resident or domiciled in a Tax Haven Jurisdiction (as
defined below) and registered with the Central Bank of Brazil
and the CVM to invest in Brazil in accordance with Resolution
No. 2,689, or a holder of ADSs; or
|
|
|
|
any other Non-Brazilian Holder whose investment is not
registered with the Central Bank and Non-Brazilian Holders
resident in a Tax Haven Jurisdiction (i.e., a
jurisdiction that does not impose
|
136
|
|
|
|
|
income tax or where the maximum income tax rate is lower than
20% or where internal legislation imposes restrictions on the
disclosure of share or investment ownership).
|
Investors identified in item (1) are subject to favorable
tax treatment, as described below.
According to Law No. 10,833, dated December 29, 2003,
capital gains realized by a Non-Brazilian Holder from the
disposition of assets located in Brazil are subject
to taxation in Brazil.
Preferred shares and common shares qualify as assets located in
Brazil, and the disposition of such assets by a Non-Brazilian
Holder may be subject to income tax on the gains assessed, in
accordance with the rules described below, regardless of where
or with whom the transaction is carried out.
There is some uncertainty as to whether ADSs qualify as
assets located in Brazil for purposes of Law
No. 10,833/03. Arguably, ADSs do not constitute assets
located in Brazil and therefore the gains realized by a
Non-Brazilian Holder on the disposition of ADSs to another
Non-Brazilian resident should not be subject to tax in Brazil.
However, we cannot assure you that the Brazilian courts would
uphold this interpretation of the definition of assets
located in Brazil in connection with the taxation of gains
realized by a Non-Brazilian Holder on the disposition of ADSs.
Consequently, gains on a disposition of ADSs by a Non-Brazilian
Holder (whether in a transaction carried out with another
Non-Brazilian Holder or a person domiciled in Brazil) may be
subject to income tax in Brazil in accordance with the rules
applicable to a disposition of shares.
Although there are grounds to sustain otherwise, the deposit of
preferred shares or common shares in exchange for ADSs may be
subject to Brazilian income tax if the acquisition cost of the
preferred shares or common shares is lower than the average
price of such shares, which is calculated as either:
|
|
|
|
(i)
|
the average price per preferred share or common share on the
Brazilian stock exchange in which the greatest number of such
shares were sold on the day of deposit; or
|
|
|
(ii)
|
if no preferred shares or common shares were sold on that day,
the average price on the Brazilian stock exchange in which the
greatest number of preferred shares or common shares were sold
in the 15 trading sessions immediately preceding such deposit.
|
The difference between the acquisition cost and the average
price of the preferred shares or common shares calculated as
described above will be considered to be a capital gain subject
to taxation. There are grounds to sustain that such taxation is
not applicable with respect to investors registered under the
rules of Resolution No. 2,689/2000, provided these are not
Tax Haven Holders.
The withdrawal of ADSs in exchange for preferred shares or
common shares is not subject to Brazilian income tax, assuming
compliance with applicable regulations regarding the
registration of the investment with the Brazilian Central Bank.
For purposes of Brazilian taxation, the income tax rules on
gains related to disposition of preferred shares or common
shares vary depending on:
|
|
|
|
|
the domicile of the Non-Brazilian Holder,
|
|
|
|
the method by which such Non-Brazilian Holder has registered its
investment with the Central Bank, and/or
|
|
|
|
how the disposition is carried out, as described below.
|
The gain realized as a result of a transaction on a Brazilian
stock, future and commodities exchange is the difference
between: (i) the amount in Brazilian currency realized on
the sale or disposition and (ii) the acquisition cost,
without any adjustment for inflation, of the shares sold.
137
Capital gains realized by a Non-Brazilian Holder on a sale or
disposition of preferred shares or common shares carried out on
a Brazilian stock exchange (which includes the transactions
carried out on the organized
over-the-counter
market) are:
|
|
|
|
|
exempt from income tax when the Non-Brazilian Holder
(i) has registered its investment in Brazil with the
Central Bank in accordance with Resolution No. 2,689/2000
(a 2,689 holder) and (ii) is not a Tax Haven
Holder; or
|
|
|
|
in all other cases, subject to income tax at a 15% rate. In
these cases, a withholding income tax at a rate of 0.005% of the
sale value is levied on the transaction and can be offset with
the eventual income tax due on the capital gain.
|
Any other gains assessed on a sale or disposition of preferred
shares or common shares that is not carried out on a Brazilian
stock exchange are subject to income tax at a 15% rate, except
for gains realized by Tax Haven Holders, which are subject to
income tax at a 25% rate.
With respect to transactions conducted on the Brazilian
non-organized
over-the-counter
market, with brokerage, a withholding income tax at a rate of
0.005% on the sale value is also levied on the transaction and
can be offset against the eventual income tax due on the capital
gain. There can be no assurance that the current favorable
treatment of 2,689 holders will continue in the future.
In the case of a redemption of preferred shares, common shares,
or ADSs or a capital reduction by a Brazilian corporation, the
positive difference between the amount received by the
Non-Brazilian Holder and the acquisition cost of the preferred
shares, common shares or ADSs redeemed is treated as capital
gain derived from the sale or exchange of shares not carried out
on a Brazilian stock exchange market and is therefore generally
subject to income tax at the rate of 15%, while the 25% rate
applies to Tax Haven Holders.
Any exercise of preemptive rights relating to the preferred
shares or common shares will not be subject to Brazilian
taxation. Any gains realized by a Non-Brazilian Holder on the
disposition of preemptive rights relating to preferred shares or
common shares in Brazil will be subject to Brazilian income
taxation in accordance with the same rules applicable to the
sale or disposition of preferred shares or common shares.
Tax on
foreign exchange and financial transactions
Foreign exchange transactions. Brazilian law
imposes a tax on foreign exchange transactions, or an
IOF/Exchange Tax, due on the conversion of reais into
foreign currency and on the conversion of foreign currency into
reais. Currently, for most foreign currency exchange
transactions, the rate of IOF/Exchange is 0.38%.
Effective as of October 20, 2009, the inflow of resources
into Brazil related to investments carried out in the Brazilian
financial and capital markets by non-Brazilian holders is
subject to the IOF/Exchange at a rate of 2%.
The outflow of resources from Brazil related to investments
carried out by non-Brazilian holders in the Brazilian financial
and capital markets is currently subject to IOF/Exchange at a
zero percent rate. In any case, the Brazilian Executive Branch
may increase such rates at any time, up to 25%, with no
retroactive effect.
Transactions involving bonds and
securities. Brazilian law imposes a tax on
transactions involving bonds and securities, or an IOF/Bonds
Tax, including those carried out on a Brazilian stock exchange.
The rate of IOF Bonds Tax applicable to transactions involving
BDRs is currently zero. However, the Brazilian government may
increase such rate at any time up to 1.5% of the transaction
amount per day, but the tax cannot be applied retroactively.
Shares traded on the Brazilian stock exchange that back
depositary receipts traded abroad are subject to IOF at a rate
of 1.5% starting November 19, 2009.
138
Other Brazilian taxes. There are no Brazilian
inheritance, gift or succession taxes applicable to the
ownership, transfer or disposition of preferred shares, common
shares or ADSs by a Non-Brazilian Holder, except for gift and
inheritance taxes which are levied by some states of Brazil on
gifts made or inheritances bestowed by a Non-Brazilian Holder to
individuals or entities resident or domiciled within such states
in Brazil. There are no Brazilian stamp, issue, registration, or
similar taxes or duties payable by holders of preferred shares
or common shares or ADSs.
U.S.
federal income tax considerations
This summary does not purport to be a comprehensive description
of all the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the
acquisition, holding or disposition of the preferred shares,
common shares or ADSs. This summary applies to
U.S. holders, as defined below, who hold their preferred
shares, common shares or ADSs as capital assets and does not
apply to special classes of holders, such as:
|
|
|
|
|
certain financial institutions,
|
|
|
|
insurance companies,
|
|
|
|
dealers in securities or foreign currencies,
|
|
|
|
tax-exempt organizations,
|
|
|
|
securities traders who elect to account for their investment in
preferred shares, common shares or ADSs on a
mark-to-market
basis,
|
|
|
|
persons holding preferred shares, common shares or ADSs as part
of hedge, straddle, conversion or other integrated financial
transactions for tax purposes,
|
|
|
|
holders whose functional currency for U.S. federal income
tax purposes is not the U.S. dollar,
|
|
|
|
partnerships or other holders treated as pass-through
entities for U.S. federal income tax purposes,
|
|
|
|
persons subject to the alternative minimum tax, or
|
|
|
|
persons owning, actually or constructively, 10% or more of our
voting shares.
|
This discussion is based on the Internal Revenue Code of 1986,
as amended to the date hereof, administrative pronouncements,
judicial decisions and final, temporary and proposed Treasury
Regulations, all as in effect on the date hereof. These
authorities are subject to differing interpretations and may be
changed, perhaps retroactively, so as to result in
U.S. federal income tax consequences different from those
discussed below. There can be no assurance that the
U.S. Internal Revenue Service (the IRS) will
not challenge one or more of the tax consequences discussed
herein or that a court will not sustain such a challenge in the
event of litigation. This summary does not address any aspect of
state, local or
non-U.S. tax
law.
YOU SHOULD CONSULT YOUR TAX ADVISORS WITH REGARD TO THE
APPLICATION OF THE U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX LAWS TO YOUR
PARTICULAR SITUATIONS AS WELL AS ANY TAX CONSEQUENCES ARISING
UNDER THE LAWS OF ANY STATE, LOCAL OR
NON-U.S. TAXING
JURISDICTION.
This discussion is also based, in part, on representations of
the depositary and the assumption that each obligation in the
deposit agreement and any related agreement will be performed in
accordance with its terms.
139
For purposes of this discussion, you are a
U.S. holder if you are a beneficial owner of
preferred shares, common shares, or ADSs that is, for
U.S. federal income tax purposes and are:
|
|
|
|
|
a citizen or resident alien individual of the United States,
|
|
|
|
a corporation created or organized in or under the laws of the
United States or of any political subdivision thereof, or
|
|
|
|
otherwise subject to U.S. federal income taxation on a net
income basis with respect to the preferred shares, common
shares, or ADSs.
|
The term U.S. holder also includes certain former citizens
of the United States.
In general, if you are the beneficial owner of American
depositary receipts evidencing ADSs, you will be treated as the
beneficial owner of the preferred shares or common shares
represented by those ADSs for U.S. federal income tax
purposes. Deposits and withdrawals of preferred shares or common
shares by you in exchange for ADSs will not result in the
realization of gain or loss for U.S. federal income tax
purposes. Your tax basis in such preferred shares will be the
same as your tax basis in such ADSs, and the holding period in
which preferred shares or common shares will include the holding
period in such ADSs.
Taxation
of dividends
The gross amount of a distribution paid on ADSs, preferred
shares or common shares, including distributions paid in the
form of payments of interest on capital for Brazilian tax
purposes, out of our current or accumulated earnings and profits
(as determined for U.S. federal income tax purposes) will
be taxable to you as foreign source dividend income and will not
be eligible for the dividends-received deduction allowed to
corporate shareholders under U.S. federal income tax law.
The amount of any such distribution will include the amount of
Brazilian withholding taxes, if any, withheld on the amount
distributed. To the extent that a distribution exceeds our
current and accumulated earnings and profits, such distribution
will be treated as a nontaxable return of capital to the extent
of your basis in the ADSs, preferred shares or common shares, as
the case may be, with respect to which such distribution is
made, and thereafter as a capital gain.
You will be required to include dividends paid in reais
in income in an amount equal to their U.S. dollar value
calculated by reference to an exchange rate in effect on the
date such distribution is received by the depositary, in the
case of ADSs, or by you, in the case of common shares or
preferred shares. If the depositary or you do not convert such
reais into U.S. dollars on the date they are
received, it is possible that you will recognize foreign
currency loss or gain, which would be ordinary loss or gain,
when the reais are converted into U.S. dollars. If
you hold ADSs, you will be considered to receive a dividend when
the dividend is received by the depositary.
Subject to certain exceptions for short-term and hedged
positions, the U.S. dollar amount of dividends received by
certain noncorporate taxpayers, including individuals, prior to
January 1, 2011 with respect to the ADSs will be subject to
taxation at a maximum rate of 15% if the dividends are
qualified dividends. Dividends paid on the ADSs will
be treated as qualified dividends if (i) the ADSs are
readily tradable on an established securities market in the
United States and (ii) the company was not, in the year
prior to the year in which the dividend was paid, and is not, in
the year in which the dividend is paid, a passive foreign
investment company (PFIC). The ADSs are listed on
the New York Stock Exchange and will qualify as readily tradable
on an established securities market in the United States so long
as they are so listed. Based on Vales audited financial
statements and relevant market and shareholder data, Vale
believes that it was not treated as a PFIC for U.S. federal
income tax purposes with respect to its 2008 or 2009 taxable
year. In addition, based on Vales audited financial
statements and its current expectations regarding the value and
nature of its assets, the sources and nature of its income, and
relevant market and shareholder data, Vale does not anticipate
becoming a PFIC for its 2010 taxable year.
140
Based on existing guidance, it is not entirely clear whether
dividends received with respect to the preferred shares and
common shares will be treated as qualified dividends (and
therefore whether such dividends will qualify for the maximum
rate of taxation of 15%), because the preferred shares and
common shares are not themselves listed on a U.S. exchange.
In addition, the U.S. Treasury has announced its intention
to promulgate rules pursuant to which holders of ADSs, preferred
shares or common stock and intermediaries through whom such
securities are held will be permitted to rely on certifications
from issuers to establish that dividends are treated as
qualified dividends. Because such procedures have not yet been
issued, it is unclear whether we will be able to comply with
them. You should consult your own tax advisors regarding the
availability of the reduced dividend tax rate in light of your
own particular circumstances.
Subject to generally applicable limitations and restrictions,
you will be entitled to a credit against your U.S. federal
income tax liability, or a deduction in computing your
U.S. federal taxable income, for Brazilian income taxes
withheld by us. You must satisfy minimum holding period
requirements to be eligible to claim a foreign tax credit for
Brazilian taxes withheld on dividends. The limitation on foreign
taxes eligible for credit is calculated separately for specific
classes of income. For this purpose dividends paid by us on our
shares will generally constitute passive income.
Foreign tax credits may not be allowed for withholding taxes
imposed in respect of certain short-term or hedged positions in
securities or in respect of arrangements in which a
U.S. holders expected economic profit is
insubstantial. You should consult your own tax advisors
concerning the implications of these rules in light of your
particular circumstances.
Taxation
of capital gains
Upon a sale or exchange of preferred shares, common shares or
ADSs, you will recognize a capital gain or loss for
U.S. federal income tax purposes equal to the difference,
if any, between the amount realized on the sale or exchange and
your adjusted tax basis in the preferred shares, common shares
or ADSs. This gain or loss will be long-term capital gain or
loss if your holding period in the preferred shares, common
shares or ADSs exceeds one year. The net amount of long-term
capital gain recognized by individual U.S. holders prior to
January 1, 2011 generally is subject to taxation at a
maximum rate of 15%. Your ability to use capital losses to
offset income is subject to limitations.
Any gain or loss will be U.S. source gain or loss for
U.S. foreign tax credit purposes. Consequently, if a
Brazilian withholding tax is imposed on the sale or disposition
of ADSs, preferred shares or common shares, and you do not
receive significant foreign source income from other sources you
may not be able to derive effective U.S. foreign tax credit
benefits in respect of such Brazilian withholding tax. You
should consult your own tax advisor regarding the application of
the foreign tax credit rules to your investment in, and
disposition of, ADSs, preferred shares or common shares.
If a Brazilian tax is withheld on the sale or disposition of
shares, the amount realized by a U.S. holder will include
the gross amount of the proceeds of such sale or disposition
before deduction of the Brazilian tax. See
Brazilian tax considerations above.
Information
reporting and backup withholding
Information returns may be filed with the Internal Revenue
Service in connection with distributions on the preferred
shares, common shares or ADSs and the proceeds from their sale
or other disposition. You may be subject to United States backup
withholding tax on these payments if you fail to provide your
taxpayer identification number or comply with certain
certification procedures or otherwise establish an exemption
from backup withholding. If you are required to make such a
certification or to establish such an exemption, you generally
must do so on IRS
Form W-9.
The amount of any backup withholding from a payment to you will
be allowed as a credit against your U.S. federal income tax
liability and may entitle you to a refund, provided that the
required information is timely furnished to the Internal Revenue
Service.
141
EVALUATION
OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Our management, with the participation of our chief executive
officer and chief financial officer, has evaluated the
effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of
December 31, 2009. There are inherent limitations to the
effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and
procedures, including the possibility of human error and the
circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures.
Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures
can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control
objectives.
Our chief executive officer and chief financial officer have
concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were
effective to provide reasonable assurance that information
required to be disclosed by us in the reports filed or submitted
under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported, within the time periods specified in the applicable
rules and forms, and that it is accumulated and communicated to
our management, including our chief executive officer and chief
financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure.
MANAGEMENTS
REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting. Our internal
control over financial reporting is a process designed to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles. Our internal control over financial
reporting includes those policies and procedures that:
(i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in
reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company;
(ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are
recorded to permit preparation of financial statements in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and
that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made
only in accordance with authorizations of management and
directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable
assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our assets that
could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness to
future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate and that the degree of compliance with the policies
or procedures may deteriorate.
Our management has assessed the effectiveness of Vales
internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2009 based on the criteria established in
Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by
the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO). Based on such assessment and
criteria, our management has concluded that our internal control
over financial reporting was effective as of December 31,
2009. The effectiveness of our internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2009 has been audited by
PricewaterhouseCoopers Auditores Independentes, an independent
registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report
which appears herein.
Our management identified no change in our internal control over
financial reporting during our fiscal year ended
December 31, 2009 that has materially affected or is
reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over
financial reporting.
142
CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE
Under NYSE rules, foreign private issuers are subject to more
limited corporate governance requirements than
U.S. domestic issuers. As a foreign private issuer, we must
comply with four principal NYSE corporate governance rules:
(1) we must satisfy the requirements of Exchange Act
Rule 10A-3
relating to audit committees; (2) our chief executive
officer must promptly notify the NYSE in writing after any
executive officer becomes aware of any non-compliance with the
applicable NYSE corporate governance rules; (3) we must
provide the NYSE with annual and interim written affirmations as
required under the NYSE corporate governance rules; and
(4) we must provide a brief description of any significant
differences between our corporate governance practices and those
followed by U.S. companies under NYSE listing standards.
The table below briefly describes the significant differences
between our domestic practice and the NYSE corporate governance
rules.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NYSE corporate governance rule for
|
|
|
Section
|
|
U.S. domestic issuers
|
|
Our approach
|
|
303A.01
|
|
A listed company must have a majority of independent directors.
Controlled companies are not required to comply with
this requirement.
|
|
We are a controlled company because more than a majority of our
voting power for the appointment of directors is controlled by
Valepar. As a controlled company, we would not be required to
comply with the majority of independent directors requirements
if we were a U.S. domestic issuer. There is no legal provision
or policy that requires us to have independent directors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
303A.03
|
|
The non-management directors of a listed company must meet at
regularly scheduled executive sessions without management.
|
|
Our non-management directors do not meet at regularly scheduled
executive sessions without management.
|
|
|
|
|
|
303A.04
|
|
A listed company must have a nominating/corporate governance
committee composed entirely of independent directors, with a
written charter that covers certain minimum specified duties.
Controlled companies are not required to comply with
this requirement.
|
|
We do not have a nominating committee. All but two of the
members of the Board of Directors are nominated by Valepar. As a
controlled company, we would not be required to comply with the
nominating/corporate governance committee requirements if we
were a U.S. domestic issuer. However, we do have a Governance
and Sustainability Committee, which is an advisory committee to
the Board of Directors. It has three members, two of whom are
directors. According to its charter, this committee is
responsible for:
|
|
|
|
|
evaluating and recommending improvements
to the effectiveness of our corporate governance practices and
the functioning of the Board of Directors;
recommending improvements to our code of
ethical conduct and management system in order to avoid
conflicts of interest between us and our shareholders or
management;
issuing reports on potential conflicts
of interest between us and our shareholders or management; and
|
|
|
|
|
reporting on policies relating to
corporate responsibility, such as environmental and social
responsibility
|
|
|
|
|
The committees charter requires at least one of its
members to be independent. For this purpose, an independent
member is a person who:
|
|
|
|
|
does not have any current relationship
with us other than being part of a committee, or being a
shareholder of the our company;
does not participate, directly or
indirectly, in the sales efforts or provision of services by
Vale;
is not a representative of the
controlling shareholders;
has not been an employee of the
controlling shareholder or of entities affiliated with a
controlling shareholder; and
has not been an executive officer of the
controlling shareholder.
|
143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NYSE corporate governance rule for
|
|
|
Section
|
|
U.S. domestic issuers
|
|
Our approach
|
|
303A.05
|
|
A listed company must have a compensation committee composed
entirely of independent directors, with a written charter that
covers certain minimum specified duties. Controlled
companies are not required to comply with this requirement.
|
|
As a controlled company, we would not be required to comply with
the compensation committee requirements if we were a U.S.
domestic issuer. However, we have an Executive Development
Committee, which is an advisory committee to the Board of
Directors. This committee has three members, all of whom are
directors. This committee is responsible for:
|
|
|
|
|
reporting on general human resources
policies;
analyzing and reporting on the adequacy
of compensation levels for our executive officers;
proposing and updating guidelines for
evaluating the performance of our executive officers; and
reporting on policies relating to health
and safety.
|
|
|
|
|
|
303A.06
303A.07
|
|
A listed company must have an audit committee with a minimum of
three independent directors who satisfy the independence
requirements of Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act, with a
written charter that covers certain minimum specified duties.
|
|
In lieu of appointing an audit committee composed of independent
members of the Board of Directors, we have established a
permanent conselho fiscal, or fiscal council, in
accordance with the applicable provisions of Brazilian corporate
law, and provided the fiscal council with additional powers to
permit it to meet the requirements of Exchange Act Rule
10A-3(c)(3).
|
|
|
|
|
The Fiscal Council currently has four members. Under Brazilian
corporate law, which provides standards for the independence of
the Fiscal Council from us and our management, none of the
members of the Fiscal Council may be a member of the Board of
Directors or an executive officer. Management does not elect
any Fiscal Council member. Our Board of Directors has
determined that one of the members of our Fiscal Council meets
the New York Stock Exchange independence requirements that would
apply to audit committee members in the absence of our reliance
on Exchange Act Rule 10A-3(c)(3).
|
|
|
|
|
The responsibilities of the Fiscal Council are set forth in its
charter. Under our bylaws, the charter must give the Fiscal
Council responsibility for the matters required under Brazilian
corporate law, as well as responsibility for:
|
|
|
|
|
establishing procedures for the receipt,
retention and treatment of complaints related to accounting,
controls and audit issues, as well as procedures for the
confidential, anonymous submission of concerns regarding such
matters;
recommending and assisting the Board of
Directors in the appointment, establishment of compensation and
dismissal of independent auditors;
pre-approving services to be rendered by
the independent auditors;
overseeing the work performed by the
independent auditors, with powers to suspend the payment of
compensation to the independent auditors; and
resolving disagreements between
management and the independent auditors regarding financial
reporting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
303A.08
|
|
Shareholders must be given the opportunity to vote on all
equity-compensation plans and material revisions thereto, with
limited exemptions set forth in the NYSE rules.
|
|
Under Brazilian corporate law, shareholder pre-approval is
required for the adoption of any equity compensation plans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
303A.09
|
|
A listed company must adopt and disclose corporate governance
guidelines that cover certain minimum specified subjects.
|
|
We have not published formal corporate governance guidelines.
|
144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NYSE corporate governance rule for
|
|
|
Section
|
|
U.S. domestic issuers
|
|
Our approach
|
|
303A.10
|
|
A listed company must adopt and disclose a code of business
conduct and ethics for directors, officers and employees, and
promptly disclose any waivers of the code for directors or
executive officers.
|
|
We have adopted a formal code of ethical conduct, which applies
to our directors, officers and employees. We report each year in
our annual report on Form 20-F any waivers of the code of
ethical conduct granted for directors or executive officers.
Our code of ethical conduct has a scope that is similar, but not
identical, to that required for a U.S. domestic company under
the NYSE rules. We also have a code of ethics that applies
specifically to employees in the corporate finance, investor
relations and accounting departments.
|
303A.12
|
|
a) Each listed company CEO must certify to the NYSE each year
that he or she is not aware of any violation by the company of
NYSE corporate governance listing standards.
|
|
We are subject to these requirements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
b) Each listed company CEO must promptly notify the NYSE in
writing after any executive officer of the listed company
becomes aware of any non-compliance with any applicable
provisions of this Section 303A.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
c) Each listed company must submit an executed Written
Affirmation annually to the NYSE. In addition, each listed
company must submit an interim Written Affirmation as and when
required by the interim Written Affirmation form specified by
the NYSE.
|
|
|
CODE OF
ETHICS
We have adopted a code of ethical conduct that applies to all
Board members, executive officers and employees, including the
chief executive officer, the chief financial officer and the
principal accounting officer. We have posted this code of
ethical conduct on our Web site, at:
http://www.vale.com
(under English Version/Investors/Corporate Governance/Code of
Ethics). Copies of our code of ethical conduct may be obtained
without charge by writing to us at the address set forth on the
front cover of this
Form 20-F.
We have not granted any implicit or explicit waivers from any
provision of our code of ethical conduct since its adoption.
PRINCIPAL
ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
PricewaterhouseCoopers Auditores Independentes billed the
following fees to us for professional services in 2008 and 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(US$ thousand)
|
|
|
Audit fees
|
|
|
8,327
|
|
|
|
8,036
|
|
Audit-related fees
|
|
|
972
|
|
|
|
229
|
|
Tax fees
|
|
|
512
|
|
|
|
278
|
|
All other fees
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fees
|
|
|
9,862
|
|
|
|
8,554
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145
Audit fees are the aggregate fees billed by
PricewaterhouseCoopers for the audit of our annual financial
statements, for the audit of the statutory financial statements
of our subsidiaries, and reviews of interim financial statements
and attestation services that are provided in connection with
statutory and regulatory filings or engagements. They also
include billed fees, which are services that only the
independent auditor reasonably can provide, including the
provision of comfort letters and consents in connection with
statutory and regulatory filings and the review of documents
filed with the SEC and other capital markets or local financial
reporting regulatory bodies. Audit-related fees are
fees charged by PricewaterhouseCoopers for assurance and related
services that are reasonably related to the performance of the
audit or review of our financial statements and are not reported
under Audit fees. In 2009 and 2008,
Audit-related fees consisted primarily of fees for
services related to due diligence and special reviews. Tax
fees relate primarily to the review of annual tax returns
and review of accuracy of the tax computation procedures with
respect to income tax and sales taxes.
INFORMATION
FILED WITH THE U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
We are subject to the information requirements of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and accordingly file reports
and other information with the SEC. Reports and other
information filed by us with the SEC may be inspected and copied
at the public reference facilities maintained by the SEC at
100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. You
can obtain further information about the operation of the Public
Reference Room by calling the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330.
You may also inspect Vales reports and other information
at the offices of the New York Stock Exchange, 11 Wall Street,
New York, New York 10005, on which Vales ADSs are listed.
Our SEC filings are also available to the public from the SEC at
http://www.sec.gov.
For further information on obtaining copies of Vales
public filings at the New York Stock Exchange, you should call
(212) 656-5060.
We also file financial statements and other periodic reports
with the CVM and the French Securities and Exchange Commission,
the Aurtorité des Marchés Financiers, or AMF.
EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit Number
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
Bylaws of Vale S.A., as amended on May 22, 2009
|
|
8
|
|
|
List of subsidiaries
|
|
12.1
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Vale pursuant to
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
|
|
12.2
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Vale pursuant to
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
|
|
13.1
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of Vale, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002
|
|
15.1
|
|
|
Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers
|
|
15.2
|
|
|
Consent of Mr. Colin Coxhead
|
|
15.3
|
|
|
Consent of SRK Consulting
|
|
15.4
|
|
|
Consent of MB Mining Consultants
|
|
15.5
|
|
|
Consent of Snowden Mining Industry Consultants Pty Ltd
|
|
15.6
|
|
|
Consent of J.T. Boyd
|
The amount of long-term debt securities of Vale or its
subsidiaries authorized under any individual outstanding
agreement does not exceed 10% of Vales total assets on a
consolidated basis. Vale hereby agrees to furnish the SEC, upon
its request, a copy of any instruments defining the rights of
holders of its long-term debt or of its subsidiaries for which
consolidated or unconsolidated financial statements are required
to be filed.
146
GLOSSARY
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alumina
|
|
Aluminum oxide. It is the main component of bauxite, and
extracted from bauxite ore in a chemical refining process. It
is the principal raw material in the electro-chemical process
from which aluminum is produced.
|
|
|
|
Aluminum
|
|
A white metal that is obtained in the electro-chemical process
of reducing aluminum oxide.
|
|
|
|
Anthracite
|
|
The hardest coal type, which contains a high percentage of fixed
carbon and a low percentage of volatile matter. Anthracite is
the highest ranked coal and it contains 90% fixed carbon, more
than any other form of coal. Anthracite has a semi-metallic
luster and is capable of burning with little smoke. Mainly used
for metallurgical purposes.
|
|
|
|
Austenitic stainless steel
|
|
Steel that contains a significant amount of chromium and
sufficient nickel to stabilize the austenite microstructure,
giving to the steel good formability and ductibility and
improving its high temperature resistance. On average,
austenitic stainless steels usually contain 8-10% nickel. They
are used in a wide variety of applications, ranging from
consumer products to industrial process equipment, as well as
for power generation and transportation equipment, kitchen
appliances and many other applications where strength, corrosion
and high temperature resistance are required.
|
|
|
|
Austenitic stainless steel ratio
|
|
The ratio of nickel-based stainless steels (austenitic steels)
relative to all stainless steels produced.
|
|
|
|
A$
|
|
Australian dollars.
|
|
|
|
Bauxite
|
|
A rock composed primarily of hydrated aluminum oxides. It is
the principal ore of alumina, the raw material from which
aluminum is made.
|
|
|
|
Beneficiation
|
|
A variety of processes whereby extracted ore from mining is
reduced to particles that can be separated into ore-mineral and
waste, the former suitable for further processing or direct use.
|
|
|
|
BOF
|
|
The vast majority of steel manufactured in the world is produced
using the basic oxygen furnace (BOF). Basic oxygen
steelmaking is a method of primary steelmaking in which
carbon-rich molten pig iron is made into steel. High purity
oxygen is blown through the molten bath to lower carbon,
silicon, manganese, and phosphorous content of the iron, while
various fluxes are used to reduce the sulfur and phosphorous
levels.
|
|
|
|
CAD
|
|
Canadian dollars.
|
|
|
|
CFR
|
|
Cost and freight. Indicates that all costs related to the
transportation of goods up to a named port of destination will
be paid by the seller of the goods.
|
|
|
|
Coal
|
|
Coal is a black or brownish-black solid combustible substance
formed by the decomposition of vegetable matter without access
to air. The rank of coal, which includes anthracite, bituminous
coal (both are called hard coal), sub-bituminous coal, and
lignite, is based on fixed carbon, volatile matter, and heating
value.
|
|
|
|
Cobalt
|
|
Cobalt is a hard, lustrous, silver-gray metal found in ores, and
used in the preparation of magnetic, wear-resistant, and
high-strength alloys (particularly for jet engines and
turbines). Its compounds are also used in the production of
inks, paints, and varnishes.
|
147
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coke
|
|
Coal that has been processed in a coke oven, for use as a
reduction agent in blast furnaces and in foundries for the
purposes of transforming iron ore into pig iron.
|
|
|
|
Concentration
|
|
Physical, chemical or biological process to increase the grade
of the metal or mineral of interest.
|
|
|
|
Copper
|
|
A reddish brown metallic element. Copper is highly conductive,
both thermally and electrically. It is highly malleable and
ductile and is easily rolled into sheet and drawn into wire.
|
|
|
|
Copper anode
|
|
Copper anode is a metallic product of the converting stage of
smelting process that is cast into blocks and generally contains
99% copper grade, which requires further processing to produce
refined copper cathodes.
|
|
|
|
Copper cathode
|
|
Copper plate with purity higher than or equal to 99.9% that is
produced by an electrolytic process.
|
|
|
|
Copper concentrate
|
|
Material produced by concentration of copper minerals contained
in the copper ore. It is the raw material used in smelters to
produce copper metal.
|
|
|
|
DR
|
|
Direct reduction. Process that removes oxygen from iron ore by
using natural gas or coal. The resulting product has an iron
grade of 90-92%.
|
|
|
|
DRI
|
|
Direct reduced iron. Iron ore lumps or pellets converted by the
direct reduction process, used mainly as a scrap substitute in
electric arc furnace steelmaking.
|
|
|
|
DWT
|
|
Deadweight ton. The measurement unit of a vessels
capacity for cargo, fuel oil, stores and crew, measured in
metric tons of 1,000 kg. A vessels total deadweight is
the total weight the vessel can carry when loaded to a
particular load line.
|
|
|
|
EAF
|
|
The electric arc furnace (EAF) is the principle
furnace type for the electric production of steel. The primary
application of the EAF is for the re-melting of steel scrap;
however, EAFs can be charged with limited amounts of iron scrap,
pig iron and direct reduced iron.
|
|
|
|
Electrowon copper cathode
|
|
Refined copper cathode is a metallic product produced by an
electrochemical process in which copper is recovered by
dissolving copper anode in an electrolyte and plating it onto an
electrode. Electrowon copper cathodes generally contain 99.99%
copper grade.
|
|
|
|
Embedded derivatives
|
|
A financial instrument within a contractual arrangement such as
leases, purchase agreements and guarantees. Its function is to
modify some or all of the cash flow that would otherwise be
required by the contract, such as caps, floors or collars.
|
|
|
|
Fe unit
|
|
A measure of the iron grade in the iron ore that is equivalent
to 1% iron grade in one metric ton of iron ore.
|
|
|
|
Ferritic stainless steel
|
|
Steel that contains significant amount of chromium, but does not
contain sufficient nickel and/or manganese to stabilize the
austenite microstructure.
|
|
|
|
Ferroalloys
|
|
Ferroalloys are alloys of iron that contain one or more other
chemical elements. These alloys are used to add these other
elements into molten metal, usually in steelmaking. The
principal ferroalloys are those of manganese, silicon and
chromium.
|
148
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOB
|
|
Free on board. It indicates that the purchaser pays for
shipping, insurance and all the other costs associated with
transportation of the goods to their destination.
|
|
|
|
Gold
|
|
A precious metal sometimes found free in nature, but usually
found in conjunction with silver, quartz, calcite, lead,
tellurium, zinc or copper. It is the most malleable and ductile
metal, a good conductor of heat and electricity and unaffected
by air and most reagents.
|
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
The proportion of metal or mineral present in ore or any other
host material.
|
|
|
|
Hard metallurgical coal
|
|
Metallurgical coking coal with the required properties to
produce a stronger/harder metallurgical coke.
|
|
|
|
Hematite Ore
|
|
Hematite is an iron oxide mineral, but also denotes the
high-grade iron ore type within the iron deposits.
|
|
|
|
Hematitinha
|
|
A lump ore originated from our Southern System with the coarsest
particle size in the range of 6.35 mm to 19 mm in diameter,
varying from 75 to 90% between different mines and ores, that is
only sold in the Brazilian domestic market.
|
|
|
|
HBI
|
|
Hot briquetted iron. Direct reduced iron that has been
processed into briquettes. Because DRI may spontaneously
combust during transportation, HBI is preferred when the
metallic material must be stored or moved.
|
|
|
|
Iridium
|
|
A dense, hard, brittle, silvery-white transition metal of the
platinum family that occurs in natural alloys with platinum or
osmium. Iridium is used in high-strength alloys that can
withstand high temperatures, primarily in high-temperature
apparatus, electrical contacts, and as a hardening agent for
platinum.
|
|
|
|
Iron ore pellets
|
|
Agglomerated ultra-fine iron ore particles of a size and quality
suitable for particular iron making processes. Our iron ore
pellets range in size from 8 mm to 18 mm.
|
|
|
|
Itabirite Ore
|
|
Itabirite is a banded iron formation and denotes the low-grade
iron ore type within the iron deposits.
|
|
|
|
Kaolin
|
|
A fine white aluminum silicate clay derived from rock composed
chiefly of feldspar, which is used as a coating agent, filler,
extender and absorbent in the paper, paint, ceramics and other
industries.
|
|
|
|
Lump ore
|
|
Iron ore or manganese ore with the coarsest particle size in the
range of 6.35 mm to 50 mm in diameter, but varying slightly
between different mines and ores.
|
|
|
|
Manganese
|
|
A hard brittle metallic element found primarily in the minerals
pyrolusite, hausmannite and manganate. Manganese is essential to
the production of virtually all steels and is important in the
production of cast iron.
|
|
|
|
Metallurgical coal
|
|
A bituminous hard coal with a quality that allows the production
of coke. Normally used in coke ovens for metallurgical purposes.
|
|
|
|
Methanol
|
|
An alcohol fuel largely used in the production of chemical and
plastic compounds.
|
149
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mineral deposit(s) or
mineralized material(s)
|
|
A mineralized body that has been intersected by a sufficient
number of closely spaced drill holes and/or underground/surface
samples to support sufficient tonnage and grade of metal(s) or
mineral(s) of interest to warrant further
exploration-development work.
|
|
|
|
Mineral resource
|
|
A concentration or occurrence of minerals of economic interest
in such form and quantity that could justify an eventual
economic extraction. The location, quantity, grade, geological
characteristics and continuity of a mineral resource are known,
estimated or interpreted from specific geological evidence
through drill holes, trenches and/or outcrops. Mineral
resources are sub-divided, in order of increasing geological
confidence, into Inferred, Indicated and Measured Resources.
|
|
|
|
MK copper concentrate
|
|
MK copper concentrate, or MK chalcocite copper concentrate, is
an intermediate copper product. The smelting process of
combined nickel-copper concentrate produces a nickel-copper
matte product, which is separated into two streams of
intermediate products, including MK chalcocite copper
concentrate, for further processing and refining. MK chalcocite
copper concentrate, which contains 70-75% copper, is the
feedstock material for copper smelter, producing copper anodes.
|
|
|
|
Nickel
|
|
A silvery white metal that takes on a high polish. It is hard,
malleable, ductile, somewhat ferromagnetic, and a fair conductor
of heat and electricity. It belongs to the iron-cobalt group of
metals and is chiefly valuable for the alloys it forms, such as
stainless steel and other corrosion-resistant alloys.
|
|
|
|
Nickel matte
|
|
An intermediate smelter product that must be further refined to
obtain pure metal.
|
|
|
|
Nickel pig iron
|
|
A low-grade nickel product, made from lateritic ores, suitable
primarily for use in stainless steel production. Nickel pig
iron typically has a nickel grade of 1.5-6% produced from blast
furnaces and 10-25% if produced from electric furnaces, with
iron accounting for most of the balance. Nickel pig iron can
also contain chrome, manganese, and impurities such as
phosphorus, sulfur and carbon.
|
|
|
|
Ntk
|
|
Net ton (the weight of the goods being transported excluding the
weight of the wagon) kilometer.
|
|
|
|
Open-pit mining
|
|
Method of extracting rock or minerals from the earth by their
removal from an open pit. Open-pit mines for extraction of ore
are used when deposits of commercially useful minerals or rock
are found near the surface; that is, where the overburden
(surface material covering the valuable deposit) is relatively
thin or the material of interest is structurally unsuitable for
underground mining.
|
|
|
|
Oxides
|
|
Compounds of oxygen with another element. For example,
magnetite is an oxide mineral formed by the chemical union of
iron with oxygen.
|
|
|
|
Palladium
|
|
A silver-white metal that is ductile and malleable, used
primarily in automobile-emissions control devices, jewelry,
electrical and chemical applications.
|
|
|
|
Pellet feed fines
|
|
Ultra-fine iron ore (less than 0.15 mm) generated by mining and
grinding. This material is aggregated into iron ore pellets
through an agglomeration process.
|
150
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pelletizing
|
|
Iron ore pelletizing is a process of agglomeration of
ultra-fines produced in iron ore exploitation and concentration
steps. The three basic stages of the process are: (i) ore
preparation (to get the correct fineness); (ii) mixing and
balling (additive mixing and ball formation); and (iii) firing
(to get ceramic bonding and strength).
|
|
|
|
Phosphate
|
|
A phosphorous compound, which occurs in natural ores and is used
as a raw material for primary production of fertilizer
nutrients, animal feeds and detergents.
|
|
|
|
Pig iron
|
|
Product of smelting iron ore usually with coke and limestone in
a blast furnace.
|
|
|
|
Platinum
|
|
A dense, precious, grey-white transition metal that is ductile
and malleable and occurs in some nickel and copper ores.
Platinum is resistant to corrosion and is used in jewelry,
laboratory equipment, electrical contacts, dentistry,
automobile-emissions control devices, flat panel TVs and hard
disk drives.
|
|
|
|
Platinum group metals
(PGMs)
|
|
Consist of platinum, palladium, rhodium, ruthenium, osmium and
iridium, of which osmium has no industrial application and no
economic value, while platinum and palladium have the greatest
economic value.
|
|
|
|
Potash
|
|
A potassium chloride compound, chiefly KCL, used as simple
fertilizer and in the production of mixture fertilizer.
|
|
|
|
Precious metals
|
|
Metals valued for their color, malleability, and rarity, with a
high economic value driven not only by their practical
industrial use, but also by their role as investments. The
widely-traded precious metals are gold, silver, platinum and
palladium.
|
|
|
|
Primary nickel
|
|
Nickel produced directly from mineral ores.
|
|
|
|
Probable (indicated) reserves
|
|
Reserves for which quantity and grade and/or quality are
computed from information similar to that used for proven
(measured) reserves, but the sites for inspection, sampling and
measurement are farther apart or are otherwise less adequately
spaced. The degree of assurance, although lower than that for
proven (measured) reserves, is high enough to assume continuity
between points of observation.
|
|
|
|
Proven (measured) reserves
|
|
Reserves for which (a) quantity is computed from dimensions
revealed in outcrops, trenches, working or drill holes; grade
and/or quality are computed from the results of detailed
sampling and (b) the sites for inspection, sampling and
measurement are spaced so closely and the geologic character is
so well defined that size, shape, depth and mineral content of
reserves are well-established.
|
|
|
|
Pulverized coal injection
(PCI)
|
|
Type of coal with specific properties ideal for direct injection
via the tuyeres of blast furnaces. This type of coal does not
require any processing or coke making, and can be directly
injected into the blast furnaces, replacing lump cokes to be
charged from the top of the blast furnaces.
|
|
|
|
Real, reais or R$
|
|
The official currency of Brazil is the real (singular)
(plural: reais).
|
|
|
|
Reserves
|
|
The part of a mineral deposit that could be economically and
legally extracted or produced at the time of the reserve
determination.
|
151
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rhodium
|
|
A hard, silvery-white, durable metal that has a high reflectance
and is primarily used in combination with platinum for
automobile-emission control devices and as an alloying agent for
hardening platinum.
|
|
|
|
Run-of-mine
(ROM)
|
|
Ore in its natural (unprocessed) state, as mined, without having
been crushed.
|
|
|
|
Ruthenium
|
|
A hard, white metal that can harden platinum and palladium used
to make severe wear-resistant electrical contacts and in other
applications in the electronics industry.
|
|
|
|
Secondary or scrap nickel
|
|
Stainless steel or other nickel-containing scrap.
|
|
|
|
Seaborne market
|
|
Comprises the total ore trade between countries using ocean bulk
vessels.
|
|
|
|
Silver
|
|
A ductile and malleable metal used in photography, coins and
medal fabrication, and in industrial applications.
|
|
|
|
Sinter feed (also known as
fines)
|
|
Iron ore fines with particles in the range of 0.15 mm to 6.35 mm
in diameter. Suitable for sintering.
|
|
|
|
Sintering
|
|
The agglomeration of sinter feed, binder and other materials,
into a coherent mass by heating without melting, to be used as
metallic charge into a blast furnace.
|
|
|
|
Slabs
|
|
The most common type of semi-finished steel. Traditional slabs
measure 10 inches thick and 30-85 inches wide (and
average 20 feet long), while the output of the recently
developed thin slab casters is two inches thick.
Subsequent to casting, slabs are sent to the hot-strip mill to
be rolled into coiled sheet and plate products.
|
|
|
|
Stainless steel
|
|
Alloy steel containing at least 10% chromium and with superior
corrosion resistance. It may also contain other elements such
as nickel, manganese, niobium, titanium, molybdenum, copper, in
order to improve mechanical, thermal properties and service
life. It is primarily classified as austenitic (200 and 300
series), ferritic (400 series), martensitic, duplex or
precipitation hardening grades.
|
|
|
|
Stainless steel scrap ratio
|
|
The ratio of secondary nickel units (either in the form of
nickel-bearing, stainless steel scrap, or in alloy steel,
foundry and nickel-based alloy scrap) relative to all nickel
units consumed in the manufacture of new stainless steel.
|
|
|
|
Thermal coal
|
|
A type of coal that is suitable for energy generation in thermal
power stations.
|
|
|
|
Troy ounce
|
|
One troy ounce equals 31.103 grams.
|
|
|
|
Underground mining
|
|
Mineral exploitation in which extraction is carried out beneath
the earths surface.
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollars or US$
|
|
United States dollars.
|
152
SIGNATURES
The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the
requirements for filing on
Form 20-F
and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to
sign this annual report on its behalf.
VALE S.A.
Name: Roger Agnelli
Title: Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Fabio
de Oliveira Barbosa
|
Name: Fabio de Oliveira Barbosa
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date: April 29, 2010
153
Public Accounting
Firm
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
Vale S.A.
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and
the related consolidated statements of income, of comprehensive
income, of cash flows and of changes in stockholders
equity present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of Vale S.A. (formerly Companhia Vale do Rio Doce) and
its subsidiaries (Company) at December 31, 2009
and 2008, and the results of their operations and their cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2009 in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our
opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects,
effective internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2009, based on criteria established in
Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO). The Companys management is responsible for these
financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control
over financial reporting and for its assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,
included in the accompanying Managements Report on
internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is
to express opinions on these financial statements and on the
Companys internal control over financial reporting based
on our integrated audits. We conducted our audits in accordance
with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the financial statements are free of material misstatement and
whether effective internal control over financial reporting was
maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial
statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements, assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the
overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal
control over financial reporting included obtaining an
understanding of internal control over financial reporting,
assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing
and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of
internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also
included performing such other procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits
provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
F-2
Vale S.A.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of
financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the
company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
As discussed in Note 2(a) to the consolidated financial
statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for
minority interest (now termed non controlling interests)
effective January 1, 2009 and, retrospectively, adjusted
the financial statements as of December 31, 2008 and 2007
and for the years then ended.
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Auditores Independentes
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
February 10, 2010
Managements
Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
The management of Vale S.A (Vale) is responsible for
establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over
financial reporting.
The companys internal control over financial reporting is
a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. The companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that: (i) pertain to the
maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately
and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the
assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance
that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and
expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance
with authorizations of management and directors of the company;
and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention
or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or
disposition of the companys assets that could have a
material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness to
future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, and that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Vales management has assessed the effectiveness of the
companys internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2009 based on the criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission COSO. Based on such assessment and
criteria, Vales management has concluded that the
companys internal control over financial reporting was
effective as of December 31, 2009.
The effectiveness of the companys internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2009 has been
audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers Auditores Independentes, an
independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in
their report which appears herein.
February 10, 2010
Roger Agnelli
Chief Executive Officer
Fabio de Oliveira Barbosa
Chief Financial Officer
F-4
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
Expressed in
millions of United States dollars
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
7,293
|
|
|
|
10,331
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
3,747
|
|
|
|
2,308
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related parties
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
Unrelated parties
|
|
|
3,041
|
|
|
|
3,067
|
|
|
|
Loans and advances to related parties
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
3,196
|
|
|
|
3,896
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax
|
|
|
852
|
|
|
|
583
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains on derivative instruments
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
Advances to suppliers
|
|
|
498
|
|
|
|
405
|
|
|
|
Recoverable taxes
|
|
|
1,511
|
|
|
|
1,993
|
|
|
|
Others
|
|
|
865
|
|
|
|
465
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,294
|
|
|
|
23,238
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
67,637
|
|
|
|
48,454
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
1,173
|
|
|
|
875
|
|
|
|
Investments in affiliated companies, joint ventures and
others
|
|
|
4,585
|
|
|
|
2,408
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill on acquisition of subsidiaries
|
|
|
2,313
|
|
|
|
1,898
|
|
|
|
Loans and advances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related parties
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
Unrelated parties
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
Prepaid pension cost
|
|
|
1,335
|
|
|
|
622
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
Judicial deposits
|
|
|
1,143
|
|
|
|
1,141
|
|
|
|
Advances to suppliers - energy
|
|
|
511
|
|
|
|
408
|
|
|
|
Recoverable taxes
|
|
|
817
|
|
|
|
394
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains on derivative instruments
|
|
|
865
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
Others
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,590
|
|
|
|
5,017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
|
102,279
|
|
|
|
79,992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-5
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Expressed in millions of United States dollars
(Except number of shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Continued)
|
|
|
As of December 31
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suppliers
|
|
|
2,309
|
|
|
|
2,261
|
|
|
|
Payroll and related charges
|
|
|
864
|
|
|
|
591
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
2,933
|
|
|
|
633
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
Loans from related parties
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
502
|
|
|
|
Taxes payable and royalties
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
Employees postretirement benefits
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
Railway sub-concession agreement payable
|
|
|
285
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
Unrealized losses on derivative instruments
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
Provisions for asset retirement obligations
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
Minimum mandatory dividends payable
|
|
|
1,464
|
|
|
|
2,068
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
618
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,181
|
|
|
|
7,237
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employees postretirement benefits
|
|
|
1,970
|
|
|
|
1,485
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
19,898
|
|
|
|
17,535
|
|
|
|
Provisions for contingencies (Note 20(b))
|
|
|
1,763
|
|
|
|
1,685
|
|
|
|
Unrealized losses on derivative instruments
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
634
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax
|
|
|
5,755
|
|
|
|
4,005
|
|
|
|
Provisions for asset retirement obligations
|
|
|
1,027
|
|
|
|
839
|
|
|
|
Debentures
|
|
|
752
|
|
|
|
379
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1,427
|
|
|
|
1,146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,601
|
|
|
|
27,708
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemable noncontrolling interest (Note 4(b))
|
|
|
731
|
|
|
|
599
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 20)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred class A stock - 7,200,000,000 no-par-value
shares authorized and 2,108,579,618 (2008 - 2,108,579,618)
issued
|
|
|
9,727
|
|
|
|
9,727
|
|
|
|
Common stock - 3,600,000,000 no-par-value shares authorized
and 3,256,724,482 (2008 - 3,256,724,482) issued
|
|
|
15,262
|
|
|
|
15,262
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock - 77,581,904 (2008 - 76,854,304)
preferred and 74,997,899 (2008 - 74,937,899) common shares
|
|
|
(1,150
|
)
|
|
|
(1,141
|
)
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
411
|
|
|
|
393
|
|
|
|
Mandatorily convertible notes - common shares
|
|
|
1,578
|
|
|
|
1,288
|
|
|
|
Mandatorily convertible notes - preferred shares
|
|
|
1,225
|
|
|
|
581
|
|
|
|
Other cumulative comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(1,808
|
)
|
|
|
(11,510
|
)
|
|
|
Undistributed retained earnings
|
|
|
28,508
|
|
|
|
18,340
|
|
|
|
Unappropriated retained earnings
|
|
|
3,182
|
|
|
|
9,616
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Company stockholders equity
|
|
|
56,935
|
|
|
|
42,556
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
2,831
|
|
|
|
1,892
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
59,766
|
|
|
|
44,448
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
|
102,279
|
|
|
|
79,992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-6
Consolidated
Statements of Income
Expressed in
millions of United States dollars
(Except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues, net of discounts, returns and
allowances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of ores and metals
|
|
|
19,915
|
|
|
|
32,779
|
|
|
|
28,441
|
|
|
|
Aluminum products
|
|
|
2,050
|
|
|
|
3,042
|
|
|
|
2,722
|
|
|
|
Revenues from logistic services
|
|
|
1,104
|
|
|
|
1,607
|
|
|
|
1,525
|
|
|
|
Other products and services
|
|
|
870
|
|
|
|
1,081
|
|
|
|
427
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,939
|
|
|
|
38,509
|
|
|
|
33,115
|
|
|
|
Taxes on revenues
|
|
|
(628
|
)
|
|
|
(1,083
|
)
|
|
|
(873
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating revenues
|
|
|
23,311
|
|
|
|
37,426
|
|
|
|
32,242
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of ores and metals sold
|
|
|
(10,026
|
)
|
|
|
(14,055
|
)
|
|
|
(13,628
|
)
|
|
|
Cost of aluminum products
|
|
|
(2,087
|
)
|
|
|
(2,267
|
)
|
|
|
(1,705
|
)
|
|
|
Cost of logistic services
|
|
|
(779
|
)
|
|
|
(930
|
)
|
|
|
(853
|
)
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(729
|
)
|
|
|
(389
|
)
|
|
|
(277
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,621
|
)
|
|
|
(17,641
|
)
|
|
|
(16,463
|
)
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(1,130
|
)
|
|
|
(1,748
|
)
|
|
|
(1,245
|
)
|
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
(981
|
)
|
|
|
(1,085
|
)
|
|
|
(733
|
)
|
|
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(950
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(1,522
|
)
|
|
|
(1,254
|
)
|
|
|
(607
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,254
|
)
|
|
|
(22,678
|
)
|
|
|
(19,048
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
6,057
|
|
|
|
14,748
|
|
|
|
13,194
|
|
|
|
Non-operating income (expenses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial income
|
|
|
381
|
|
|
|
602
|
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
Financial expenses
|
|
|
(1,558
|
)
|
|
|
(1,765
|
)
|
|
|
(2,517
|
)
|
|
|
Gains (losses) on derivatives, net
|
|
|
1,528
|
|
|
|
(812
|
)
|
|
|
931
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange and indexation gains (losses), net
|
|
|
675
|
|
|
|
364
|
|
|
|
2,553
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) on sale of assets
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
777
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,066
|
|
|
|
(1,531
|
)
|
|
|
2,039
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes and equity results
|
|
|
7,123
|
|
|
|
13,217
|
|
|
|
15,233
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
(2,084
|
)
|
|
|
(1,338
|
)
|
|
|
(3,901
|
)
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
803
|
|
|
|
700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,100
|
)
|
|
|
(535
|
)
|
|
|
(3,201
|
)
|
|
|
Equity in results of affiliates, joint ventures and other
investments
|
|
|
433
|
|
|
|
794
|
|
|
|
595
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
5,456
|
|
|
|
13,476
|
|
|
|
12,627
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
|
802
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to the Companys stockholders
|
|
|
5,349
|
|
|
|
13,218
|
|
|
|
11,825
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted earnings per share attributable to
Companys stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per preferred share
|
|
|
0.97
|
|
|
|
2.58
|
|
|
|
2.41
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share
|
|
|
0.97
|
|
|
|
2.58
|
|
|
|
2.41
|
|
|
|
Earnings per preferred share linked to mandatorily convertible
notes(*)
|
|
|
1.71
|
|
|
|
4.09
|
|
|
|
3.30
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share linked to mandatorily convertible
notes(*)
|
|
|
2.21
|
|
|
|
4.29
|
|
|
|
3.51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) Basic earnings per share
only, as dilution assumes conversion
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-7
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
Expressed in
millions of United States dollars
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
5,456
|
|
|
|
13,476
|
|
|
|
12,627
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash from
operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
2,722
|
|
|
|
2,807
|
|
|
|
2,186
|
|
|
|
Dividends received
|
|
|
386
|
|
|
|
513
|
|
|
|
394
|
|
|
|
Equity in results of affiliates, joint ventures and other
investments
|
|
|
(433
|
)
|
|
|
(794
|
)
|
|
|
(595
|
)
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
(803
|
)
|
|
|
(700
|
)
|
|
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
950
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
376
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
(Gain)/Loss on sale of investments
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
(777
|
)
|
|
|
Foreign exchange and indexation losses (gains), net
|
|
|
(1,095
|
)
|
|
|
451
|
|
|
|
(2,827
|
)
|
|
|
Unrealized derivative losses (gains), net
|
|
|
(1,382
|
)
|
|
|
809
|
|
|
|
(917
|
)
|
|
|
Unrealized interest (income) expense, net
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
Others
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
Decrease (increase) in assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
616
|
|
|
|
(466
|
)
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
530
|
|
|
|
(467
|
)
|
|
|
(343
|
)
|
|
|
Recoverable taxes
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
(263
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
Others
|
|
|
(455
|
)
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
(292
|
)
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suppliers
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
703
|
|
|
|
998
|
|
|
|
Payroll and related charges
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(234
|
)
|
|
|
(140
|
)
|
|
|
393
|
|
|
|
Others
|
|
|
373
|
|
|
|
(93
|
)
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
7,136
|
|
|
|
17,114
|
|
|
|
11,012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short term investments
|
|
|
(1,439
|
)
|
|
|
(2,308
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
Loans and advances receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan proceeds
|
|
|
(181
|
)
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
Repayments
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
Others
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
Judicial deposits
|
|
|
(132
|
)
|
|
|
(133
|
)
|
|
|
(125
|
)
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
(1,947
|
)
|
|
|
(128
|
)
|
|
|
(324
|
)
|
|
|
Additions to, property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(8,096
|
)
|
|
|
(8,972
|
)
|
|
|
(6,651
|
)
|
|
|
Proceeds from disposal of investments/property, plant and
equipment
|
|
|
606
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
1,042
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of subsidiaries, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(1,952
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2,926
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(13,159
|
)
|
|
|
(11,401
|
)
|
|
|
(9,006
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt, additions
|
|
|
1,285
|
|
|
|
1,076
|
|
|
|
4,483
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt, repayments
|
|
|
(1,254
|
)
|
|
|
(1,311
|
)
|
|
|
(5,040
|
)
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan proceeds
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
259
|
|
|
|
Repayments
|
|
|
(373
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(273
|
)
|
|
|
Issuances of long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third parties
|
|
|
3,104
|
|
|
|
1,890
|
|
|
|
7,212
|
|
|
|
Repayments of long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third parties
|
|
|
(307
|
)
|
|
|
(1,130
|
)
|
|
|
(11,130
|
)
|
|
|
Treasury stock
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(752
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
Mandatorily convertible notes
|
|
|
934
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,869
|
|
|
|
Capital increase
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
12,190
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
Dividends and interest attributed to Companys stockholders
|
|
|
(2,724
|
)
|
|
|
(2,850
|
)
|
|
|
(1,875
|
)
|
|
|
Dividends and interest attributed to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
(143
|
)
|
|
|
(714
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
625
|
|
|
|
9,004
|
|
|
|
(5,209
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(5,398
|
)
|
|
|
14,717
|
|
|
|
(3,203
|
)
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
2,360
|
|
|
|
(5,432
|
)
|
|
|
(199
|
)
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
10,331
|
|
|
|
1,046
|
|
|
|
4,448
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
|
7,293
|
|
|
|
10,331
|
|
|
|
1,046
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on short-term debt
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
Interest on long-term debt
|
|
|
(1,113
|
)
|
|
|
(1,255
|
)
|
|
|
(1,289
|
)
|
|
|
Income tax
|
|
|
(1,331
|
)
|
|
|
(2,867
|
)
|
|
|
(3,284
|
)
|
|
|
Non-cash transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest capitalized
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-8
Consolidated
Statements of Changes in Stockholders Equity
Expressed in
millions of United States dollars
(Except number of shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Preferred class A stock (including twelve special
shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of the period
|
|
|
9,727
|
|
|
|
4,953
|
|
|
|
4,702
|
|
|
|
Capital increase
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4,774
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
Transfer from undistributed retained earnings
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of the period
|
|
|
9,727
|
|
|
|
9,727
|
|
|
|
4,953
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of the period
|
|
|
15,262
|
|
|
|
7,742
|
|
|
|
3,806
|
|
|
|
Capital increase
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
7,520
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
Transfer from undistributed retained earnings
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,936
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of the period
|
|
|
15,262
|
|
|
|
15,262
|
|
|
|
7,742
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of the period
|
|
|
(1,141
|
)
|
|
|
(389
|
)
|
|
|
(389
|
)
|
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(752
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of the period
|
|
|
(1,150
|
)
|
|
|
(1,141
|
)
|
|
|
(389
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of the period
|
|
|
393
|
|
|
|
498
|
|
|
|
498
|
|
|
|
Change in the period
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
(105
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of the period
|
|
|
411
|
|
|
|
393
|
|
|
|
498
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mandatorily convertible notes - common shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of the period
|
|
|
1,288
|
|
|
|
1,288
|
|
|
|
1,288
|
|
|
|
Change in the period
|
|
|
290
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of the period
|
|
|
1,578
|
|
|
|
1,288
|
|
|
|
1,288
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mandatorily convertible notes - preferred shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of the period
|
|
|
581
|
|
|
|
581
|
|
|
|
581
|
|
|
|
Change in the period
|
|
|
644
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of the period
|
|
|
1,225
|
|
|
|
581
|
|
|
|
581
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other cumulative comprehensive income (deficit) Cumulative
translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of the period
|
|
|
(11,493
|
)
|
|
|
1,340
|
|
|
|
(1,628
|
)
|
|
|
Change in the period
|
|
|
9,721
|
|
|
|
(12,833
|
)
|
|
|
2,968
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of the period
|
|
|
(1,772
|
)
|
|
|
(11,493
|
)
|
|
|
1,340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) - available-for-sale securities,
net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of the period
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
Change in the period
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(194
|
)
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of the period
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Surplus (deficit) accrued pension plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of the period
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
353
|
|
|
|
Change in the period
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(109
|
)
|
|
|
(278
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of the period
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow hedge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of the period
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
Change in the period
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of the period
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other cumulative comprehensive income (deficit)
|
|
|
(1,808
|
)
|
|
|
(11,510
|
)
|
|
|
1,655
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undistributed retained earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of the period
|
|
|
18,340
|
|
|
|
15,317
|
|
|
|
9,555
|
|
|
|
Transfer from/to unappropriated retained earnings
|
|
|
10,168
|
|
|
|
3,023
|
|
|
|
9,949
|
|
|
|
Capitalized earnings
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(4,187
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of the period
|
|
|
28,508
|
|
|
|
18,340
|
|
|
|
15,317
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unappropriated retained earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of the period
|
|
|
9,616
|
|
|
|
1,631
|
|
|
|
2,505
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to the stockholders Company
|
|
|
5,349
|
|
|
|
13,218
|
|
|
|
11,825
|
|
|
|
Interest on mandatorily convertible debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred class A stock
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
(93
|
)
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
Dividends and interest attributed to stockholders
equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred class A stock
|
|
|
(570
|
)
|
|
|
(806
|
)
|
|
|
(1,049
|
)
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
(894
|
)
|
|
|
(1,262
|
)
|
|
|
(1,634
|
)
|
|
|
Appropriation from/to undistributed retained earnings
|
|
|
(10,168
|
)
|
|
|
(3,023
|
)
|
|
|
(9,949
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of the period
|
|
|
3,182
|
|
|
|
9,616
|
|
|
|
1,631
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Company stockholders equity
|
|
|
56,935
|
|
|
|
42,556
|
|
|
|
33,276
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of the period
|
|
|
1,892
|
|
|
|
2,180
|
|
|
|
2,465
|
|
|
|
Disposals and (acquisitions) of noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(817
|
)
|
|
|
Cumulative translation adjustments
|
|
|
823
|
|
|
|
(445
|
)
|
|
|
333
|
|
|
|
Cash flow hedge
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
|
802
|
|
|
|
Dividends and interest attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
|
|
(137
|
)
|
|
|
(700
|
)
|
|
|
Capitalization of stockholders advances
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of the period
|
|
|
2,831
|
|
|
|
1,892
|
|
|
|
2,180
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
59,766
|
|
|
|
44,448
|
|
|
|
35,456
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred class A stock (including twelve special shares)
|
|
|
2,108,579,618
|
|
|
|
2,108,579,618
|
|
|
|
1,919,516,400
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
3,256,724,482
|
|
|
|
3,256,724,482
|
|
|
|
2,999,797,716
|
|
|
|
Buy-backs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of the period
|
|
|
(151,792,203
|
)
|
|
|
(86,923,184
|
)
|
|
|
(86,927,072
|
)
|
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
(831,400
|
)
|
|
|
(64,869,259
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
43,800
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
3,888
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of the period
|
|
|
(152,579,803
|
)
|
|
|
(151,792,203
|
)
|
|
|
(86,923,184
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,212,724,297
|
|
|
|
5,213,511,897
|
|
|
|
4,832,390,932
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-9
Consolidated
Statements of Comprehensive Income (deficit)
Expressed in
millions of United States dollars
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (deficit) is comprised as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Companys stockholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Companys stockholders
|
|
|
5,349
|
|
|
|
13,218
|
|
|
|
11,825
|
|
|
|
Cumulative translation adjustments
|
|
|
9,721
|
|
|
|
(12,833
|
)
|
|
|
2,968
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) - available-for-sale
securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross balance as of the period/year end
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
(230
|
)
|
|
|
(123
|
)
|
|
|
Tax (expense) benefit
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(194
|
)
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
|
|
Surplus (deficit) accrued pension plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross balance as of the period/year end
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
(194
|
)
|
|
|
(410
|
)
|
|
|
Tax (expense) benefit
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(109
|
)
|
|
|
(278
|
)
|
|
|
Cash flow hedge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross balance as of the period/year end
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
Tax (expense) benefit
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income (deficit) attributable to
Companys stockholders
|
|
|
15,051
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
14,484
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interests:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
|
802
|
|
|
|
Cumulative translation adjustments
|
|
|
823
|
|
|
|
(445
|
)
|
|
|
333
|
|
|
|
Cash flow hedge
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income (deficit) attributable to
Noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
912
|
|
|
|
(208
|
)
|
|
|
1,156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income (deficit)
|
|
|
15,963
|
|
|
|
(155
|
)
|
|
|
15,640
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-10
Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements
Expressed in millions of United States dollars, unless
otherwise stated
1 The
Company and its operations
Vale S.A., formerly Companhia Vale do Rio Doce,
(Vale, the Company or we) is
a limited liability company incorporated in Brazil. Operations
are carried out through Vale and our subsidiary companies, joint
ventures and affiliates, and mainly consist of mining,
non-ferrous metal production, logistics and steel activities.
At December 31, 2009, our principal consolidated operating
subsidiaries are the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% voting
|
|
head office
|
|
|
Subsidiary
|
|
% ownership
|
|
capital
|
|
location
|
|
Principal activity
|
|
Alumina do Norte do Brasil S.A. - Alunorte
|
|
57.03
|
|
59.02
|
|
Brazil
|
|
Alumina
|
Alumínio Brasileiro S.A. - Albras
|
|
51.00
|
|
51.00
|
|
Brazil
|
|
Aluminum
|
CADAM S.A
|
|
61.48
|
|
100.00
|
|
Brazil
|
|
Kaolin
|
CVRD Overseas Ltd
|
|
100.00
|
|
100.00
|
|
Cayman Islands
|
|
Trading
|
Vale Colombia Ltd
|
|
100.00
|
|
100.00
|
|
Colombia
|
|
Coal
|
Ferrovia Centro-Atlântica S. A
|
|
99.99
|
|
99.99
|
|
Brazil
|
|
Logistic
|
Ferrovia Norte Sul S.A
|
|
100.00
|
|
100.00
|
|
Brazil
|
|
Logistic
|
Mineração Corumbá Reunidas S.A.
|
|
100.00
|
|
100.00
|
|
Brazil
|
|
Iron ore
|
Pará Pigmentos S.A.
|
|
86.17
|
|
85.57
|
|
Brazil
|
|
Kaolin
|
PT International Nickel Indonesia Tbk
|
|
59.09
|
|
59.09
|
|
Indonesia
|
|
Nickel
|
Vale Manganése Norway
|
|
100.00
|
|
100.00
|
|
Norway
|
|
Ferroalloys
|
Vale Manganês S.A.
|
|
100.00
|
|
100.00
|
|
Brazil
|
|
Manganese and Ferroalloys
|
Vale Manganèse France
|
|
100.00
|
|
100.00
|
|
France
|
|
Ferroalloys
|
Vale Australia Pty Ltd.
|
|
100.00
|
|
100.00
|
|
Australia
|
|
Coal
|
Vale Inco Limited
|
|
100.00
|
|
100.00
|
|
Canada
|
|
Nickel
|
Vale International S.A
|
|
100.00
|
|
100.00
|
|
Switzerland
|
|
Trading
|
All majority-owned subsidiaries in which we have both share and
management control are consolidated. All significant
intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated. Our
variable interest entities in which we are the primary
beneficiary are consolidated. Investments in unconsolidated
affiliates and joint ventures are accounted for under the equity
method (Note 13).
We evaluate the carrying value of our equity accounted
investments in relation to publicly quoted market prices when
available. If the quoted market price is below book value, and
such decline is considered other than temporary, we write-down
our equity investments to quoted market value.
We define joint ventures as businesses in which we and a small
group of other partners each participate actively in the overall
entity management, based on a stockholders agreement. We define
affiliates as businesses in which we participate as a minority
stockholder but with significant influence over the operating
and financial policies of the investee.
Our participation in hydroelectric projects is made via
consortium contracts under which we have undivided interests in
the assets and are liable for our proportionate share of
liabilities and expenses, which are based on our proportionate
share of power output. We do not have joint liability for any
obligations. No separate legal or tax status is granted to
consortia under Brazilian law. Accordingly, we recognize our
proportionate share of costs and our undivided interest in
assets relating to hydroelectric projects (Note 12).
F-11
|
|
3
|
Summary of
significant accounting policies
|
The preparation of financial statements requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets
and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
period. Estimates are used for, but not limited to, the
selection of useful lives of property, plant and equipment,
impairment, provisions necessary for contingent liabilities,
fair values assigned to assets and liabilities acquired in
business combinations, income tax valuation allowances, employee
post retirement benefits and other similar evaluations. Actual
results could differ from those estimated.
We have prepared our consolidated financial statements in
accordance with United States generally accepted accounting
principles (US GAAP), which differ in certain
respects from the accounting practices adopted in Brazil
(Brazilian GAAP) which are the basis for our
statutory financial statements.
These financial statements reflect the retrospective adoption of
the Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements Standard, as of December 31, 2008 and the three
years then ended. The noncontrolling interest standard, which
clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an
ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should be
reported as equity in the consolidated financial statements, as
shown in the consolidated statements of changes in
stockholders equity and consolidated statements of
comprehensive income (deficit). Noncontrolling interests that
could be redeemed upon the occurrence of certain events outside
the Companys control have been classified as redeemable
noncontrolling interest using the mezzanine presentation on the
balance sheet between liabilities and stockholders equity,
retroactively to all periods presented.
Since December 2007, significant modifications have been made to
Brazilian GAAP as part of a convergence project with
International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and as from
2010 full year financial statements the convergence will be
completed and therefore the IFRS will be the accounting practice
adopted in Brazil. The Company does not expect to discontinue
the US GAAP reporting during 2010.
The Brazilian Real is the parent Companys functional
currency. We have selected the US dollar as our reporting
currency.
All assets and liabilities have been translated to US dollars at
the closing rate of exchange at each balance sheet date (or, if
unavailable, the first available exchange rate). All statement
of income accounts have been translated to US dollars at the
average exchange rates prevailing during the respective periods.
Capital accounts are recorded at historical exchange rates.
Translation gains and losses are recorded in the Cumulative
Translation Adjustments account (CTA) in
stockholders equity.
The results of operations and financial position of our entities
that have a functional currency other than the US dollar,
have been translated into US dollars and adjustments to
translate those statements into US dollars are recorded in the
CTA in stockholders equity.
The exchange rates used to translate the assets and liabilities
of the Brazilian operations at December 31, 2009 and 2008,
were R$1.7412 and R$2.3370, respectively.
The net transaction gain (loss) included in our statement of
income (Foreign exchange and indexation gains (losses),
net) was US$665, US$(1,011) and US$1,639 in the years
ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
The Company has performed an evaluation of subsequent events
through February 10, 2010 which is the date the financial
statements were issued.
F-12
|
|
b)
|
Cash equivalents
and short-term investments
|
Cash flows from overnight investments and fundings are reported
net. Short-term investments that have a ready market and
original maturities of 90 days or less are classified as
Cash equivalents. The remaining investments, with,
between 91- to 360-day maturities are stated at fair value and
presented as Short-term investments.
Assets and liabilities that are realizable or due more than
12 months after the balance sheet date are classified as
long-term.
Inventories are recorded at the average cost of purchase or
production, reduced to market value (net realizable value less a
reasonable margin) when lower. Stockpiled inventories are
accounted for as processed when they are removed from the mine.
The cost of finished goods comprises depreciation and all direct
costs necessary to convert stockpiled inventories into finished
goods.
We classify proven and probable reserve quantities attributable
to stockpiled inventories as inventories. These reserve
quantities are not included in the total proven and probable
reserve quantities used in the units of production,
depreciation, depletion and amortization calculations.
We periodically assess our inventories to identify obsolete or
slow-moving inventories, and if needed we recognize definitive
allowances for them.
|
|
e)
|
Removal of waste
materials to access mineral deposits
|
Stripping costs (the costs associated with the removal of
overburdened and other waste materials) incurred during the
development of a mine, before production commences, are
capitalized as part of the depreciable cost of developing the
property. Such costs are subsequently amortized over the useful
life of the mine based on proven and probable reserves.
Post-production stripping costs are included in the cost of the
inventory produced (that is extracted), at each mine
individually during the period that the stripping costs are
incurred.
|
|
f)
|
Property, plant
and equipment and intangible assets
|
Property, plant and equipment are recorded as cost, including
interest cost incurred during the construction of major new
facilities. We compute depreciation on the straight-line method
at annual average rates which take into consideration the useful
lives of the assets, as follows: 3.73% for railroads, 1.5% for
buildings, 4.23% for installations and 7.73% for other
equipment. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged
to operating costs and expenses as incurred.
We capitalize the costs of developing major new ore bodies or
expanding the capacity of operating mines and amortize these to
operations on the unit-of-production method based on the total
probable and proven quantity of ore to be recovered. Exploration
costs are expensed. Once the economic viability of mining
activities is established, subsequent development costs are
capitalized.
Separately acquired intangible assets are shown at historical
cost. Intangible assets acquired in a business combination are
recognized at fair value at the acquisition date. All our
intangible assets have definite useful lives and are carried at
cost less accumulated amortization, which is calculated using
the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives.
F-13
We adopt business combinations to record acquisitions of
interests in other companies. This purchase method,
requires that we reasonably determine the fair value of the
identifiable tangible and intangible assets and liabilities of
acquired companies and segregate goodwill as an intangible asset.
We assign goodwill to reporting units and test each reporting
units goodwill for impairment at least annually, and
whenever circumstance indicating that recognized goodwill may
not be fully recovered are identified. We perform the annual
goodwill impairment tests during the last quarter of the year.
Goodwill is reviewed for impairment utilizing a two step
process. In the first step, we compare a reporting units
fair value with its carrying amount to identify any potential
goodwill impairment loss. If the carrying amount of a reporting
unit exceeds the units fair value, based on a discounted
cash flow analysis, we carry out the second step of the
impairment test, measuring and recording the amount, if any, of
the units goodwill impairment loss.
|
|
h)
|
Impairment of
long-lived assets
|
All long-lived assets, are tested to determine if they are
recoverable from operating earnings on an undiscounted cash flow
basis over their useful lives whenever events or changes in
circumstance indicate that the carrying value may not be
recoverable.
When we determine that the carrying value of long-lived assets
and definite-life intangible assets may not be recoverable, we
measure any impairment loss based on a projected discounted cash
flow method using a discount rate determined to be commensurate
with the risk inherent in our current business model.
|
|
i)
|
Available-for-sale
equity securities
|
Equity securities classified as available-for-sale
are recorded pursuant to accounting for certain investments in
debt and equity securities. Accordingly, we classify unrealized
holding gains and losses, net of taxes, as a separate component
of stockholders equity until realized.
The liability for future compensation for employee vacations is
fully accrued as earned.
|
|
k)
|
Derivatives and
hedging activities
|
We apply accounting for derivative financial instruments and
hedging activities, as amended. This standard requires that we
recognize all derivative financial instruments as either assets
or liabilities on our balance sheet and measure such instruments
at fair value. Changes in the fair value of derivatives are
recorded in each period in current earnings or in other
comprehensive income, in the latter case depending on whether a
transaction is designated as an effective hedge and has been
effective during the period.
|
|
l)
|
Asset retirement
obligations
|
Our retirement obligations consist primarily of estimated
closure costs, the initial measurement of which is recognized as
a liability discounted to present value and subsequently
accreted through earnings. An asset retirement cost equal to the
initial liability is capitalized as part of the related
assets carrying value and depreciated over the
assets useful life.
Revenues are recognized when title is transferred to the
customer or services are rendered. Revenue from exported
products is recognized when such products are loaded on board
the ship. Revenue from products sold in the domestic market is
recognized when delivery is made to the customer. Revenue from
logistic services is recognized when the service order has been
fulfilled. Expenses and costs are recognized on the accrual
basis.
F-14
The deferred tax effects of tax loss carryforwards and temporary
differences are recognized pursuant to accounting for income
taxes. A valuation allowance is made when we believe that it is
more likely than not that tax assets will not be fully recovered
in the future.
Earnings per share are computed by dividing net income by the
weighted average number of common and preferred shares
outstanding during the period.
|
|
p)
|
Interest
attributed to stockholders equity (dividend)
|
Brazilian corporations are permitted to distribute interest
attributable to stockholders equity. The calculation is
based on the stockholders equity amounts as stated in the
statutory accounting records and the interest rate applied may
not exceed the long-term interest rate (TJLP) determined by the
Brazilian Central Bank.
Also, such interest may not exceed 50% of net income for the
year nor 50% of retained earnings plus revenue reserves as
determined by Brazilian GAAP.
As the notional interest charge is tax deductible in Brazil, the
benefit to us, as opposed to making a dividend payment, is a
reduction in our income tax charge. Income tax of 15% is
withheld on behalf of the stockholders relative to the interest
distribution. Under Brazilian law, interest attributed to
stockholders equity is considered as part of the annual
minimum mandatory dividend (Note 17). This notional
interest distribution is treated for accounting purposes as a
deduction from stockholders equity in a manner similar to
a dividend and the tax credit recorded in income.
|
|
q)
|
Pension and other
post retirement benefits
|
We sponsor private pensions and other post retirement benefits
for our employees which are actuarially determined and
recognized as an asset or liability or both depending on the
funded or unfunded status of each plan in accordance with
employees accounting for defined benefit pension and other
post retirement plans. The cost of our defined benefit and
prior service costs or credits that arise during the period and
are not components of net periodic benefit costs are recorded in
other cumulative comprehensive income (deficit).
|
|
4
|
Accounting
pronouncements
|
|
|
a)
|
Newly issued
accounting pronouncements
|
Accounting Standards Update (ASU) number
2010-06 Fair
Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820): Improving
Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements. This update provides
amendments to Subtopic
820-10 and
are expected to provide more robust disclosures about
(1) the different classes of assets and liabilities
measured at fair value, (2) the valuation techniques and
inputs used, (3) the activity in Level 3 fair value
measurements, and (4) the transfers between Levels 1,
2, and 3. The Company will adopt this update in 2010 and does
not expect relevant impacts on fair value information currently
disclosed.
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued an amendment to Interpretation
No. 46(R) on the accounting and disclosure requirements for
the consolidation of variable interest entities
(VIEs). Subsequently, in December 2009, the
Accounting Standards Update (ASU) number
2009-17
Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) was issued. The
amendments replace the quantitative-based risks and rewards
calculation, for determining which reporting entity has a
controlling financial interest in a VIE, with a qualitative
analysis when determining whether or not it must consolidate a
VIE. The newly required approach is focused on identifying which
reporting entity has the power to direct the activities of a
variable interest entity that most significantly impact the
entitys economic performance and (1) the obligation
to absorb losses of the entity or (2) the right to receive
benefits from the entity. The amendments also require an
enterprise to continuously reassess whether it must consolidate
a VIE. Additionally, the amendments eliminated the scope
exception on qualifying special-purpose entities
(QSPE) and require enhanced disclosures about:
involvement
F-15
with VIEs, significant changes in risk exposures, impacts on the
financial statements, and, significant judgments and assumptions
used to determine whether or not to consolidate a VIE. The
Company will adopt these amendments in 2010. We are currently
assessing the potential impacts of this pronouncement and do not
expect major changes to the reported financial information.
In June 2009, the FASB issued an amendment to the
accounting and disclosure requirements for transfers of
financial assets. Subsequently, in December 2009, the Accounting
Standards Update (ASU) number
2009-16
Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets an
amendment of FASB Statement No. 140 was issued. The
amendments improve financial reporting requiring greater
transparency and additional disclosures for transfers of
financial assets and the entitys continuing involvement
with them and also change the requirements for derecognizing
financial assets. In addition, the amendments eliminate the
exceptions for QSPE from the consolidation guidance and the
exception that permitted sale accounting for certain mortgage
securitizations when a transferor has not surrendered control
over the transferred financial assets. The Company will adopt
the amendments in 2010 and do not expect major effect to its
financial statements.
Accounting Standards Update (ASU) number
2009-08
Earning per share issued by the FASB provides additional
guidance related to calculation of earnings per share. This
guidance amends ASC 260.
The Company understands that the other recently issued
accounting pronouncements, that are not effective as of and for
the year ended December 31, 2009, are not expected to be
relevant for its consolidated financial statements.
|
|
b)
|
Accounting
standards adopted in 2009
|
Accounting Standards Update (ASU) number
2009-05 Fair
value measurements and disclosures issued by the FASB provides
additional guidance related to address the lack of observable
market information to measure the fair value of a liability.
This guidance amends ASC 820. It is effective after the
issuance. The Company already adopts these statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards
Codification (Codification). The Codification became the single
source for all authoritative GAAP recognized by the FASB to be
applied for financial statements issued for periods ending after
September 15, 2009. The Codification does not change GAAP
and does not have an affect on our financial position, results
of operations or liquidity.
In June 2009, we adopted a newly issued accounting standard for
accounting and disclosures of events that occur after the
balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or
are available to be issued. In particular, this statement sets
forth (1) the period after the balance sheet date during
which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or
transactions that may occur for potential recognition or
disclosure in the financial statements; (2) the
circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or
transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its
financial statements; and (3) the disclosures that an
entity should make about events or transactions that occurred
after the balance sheet date. The standard is effective for
interim or annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The
Company already adopts this statement.
In June 2009, we adopted a newly issued accounting standard for
fair value of financial instruments which requires disclosures
about fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting
periods of publicly traded companies as well as in annual
financial statements. This standard also requires these
disclosures in summarized financial information at interim
reporting periods. This standard shall be effective for interim
reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, and we have
not opted for early adoption of this standard for the
three-month period ended March 31, 2009. The application of
this standard will expand the Companys disclosures
regarding the use of fair value in interim periods. The required
information is disclosed in Note 22 (d).
In January 2009, we adopted a newly issued accounting standard
regarding disclosure of derivative instruments and hedging
activities. As such, entities must now provide qualitative
disclosure about objectives and strategies for using
derivatives, quantitative disclosures about fair value amounts
of and gain and losses on derivative instruments and disclosures
about credit-risk related contingent features in derivative
agreements on a quarterly basis regarding how and why the entity
uses derivatives, how derivatives and related hedged items are
accounted for under the new standard and how derivatives and
related hedged items affect the entitys financial
position,
F-16
performance and cash flows. The required information is
disclosed in Note 25. In addition, unrealized gains or
losses on derivatives, previously reported net on balance sheet
are presented gross as assets and liabilities. Comparative
information for 2008 has been reclassified.
In January 2009, we adopted a newly issued accounting standard
for noncontrolling interests. This new accounting standard
clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an
ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should be
reported as equity in the consolidated financial statements and
consolidated statements of changes in stockholders equity.
Noncontrolling interests that could be redeemed upon the
occurrence of certain events outside the Companys control
have been classified as redeemable noncontrolling interest using
the mezzanine presentation on the balance sheet between
liabilities and stockholders equity, retroactive to all
periods presented.
In January 2009, we adopted a newly issued accounting standard
that applies prospectively to business combinations for which
the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first
annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15,
2008.
|
|
5
|
Major
acquisitions and disposals
|
|
|
a)
|
Mineração
Corumbá Reunidas S.A.
|
In September 2009, we acquired from Rio Tinto Plc,
Mineração Corumbá Reunidas S.A. (MCR). MCR is the
owner of an iron ore mining operation with high iron content and
a strategic importance to our product portfolio, adding a
substantial volume of lump ore to our reserves.
The purchase price allocation for Mineração
Corumbá Reunidas S.A. is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation
|
Total disbursements(*)
|
|
|
814
|
|
|
|
Cash acquired
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase price
|
|
|
802
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed, net of
cash acquired
|
|
|
(240
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to fair value of inventory
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
|
|
Adjustment to fair value of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(754
|
)
|
|
|
Adjustment to fair value of intangible assets
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
Deferred taxes on the above adjustments
|
|
|
290
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fair value adjustment
|
|
|
(562
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) Including the payment
related to working capital adjustment
The acquired business contributed revenues of US$24 and net
profit of US$(16) for the period from October 1, 2009 to
December 31, 2009. If the acquisition had occurred on
January 1, 2009, our revenue would have been US$52, and
profit before tax would have been US$(88). These amounts have
been calculated using the Companys accounting policies and
by adjusting the results of the subsidiary to reflect the
additional depreciation and amortization that would have been
charged assuming the fair value adjustments to property, plant
and equipment and intangibles assets applied from
January 1, 2009.
In March 2009, we acquired 100% of Diamond Coal Ltd that owns
coal assets in Colombia for US$300, from Cement Argos. Cash
payment was made during the quarter ending June 30, 2009.
The primary reason for the acquisition was that the coal assets
are an important part of our growth strategy. Therefore, Vale is
seeking to build a coal asset platform in Colombia, as it is the
worlds third largest exporter of high-quality thermal
coal, given its low level of sulfur and high calorific value.
F-17
The purchase price allocation for Diamond Coal Ltd. is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation
|
Total disbursements
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to fair value of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(280
|
)
|
|
|
Deferred taxes on above adjustments
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustment
|
|
|
(188
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
c)
|
Green Mineral
Resources
|
In February 2009, we acquired Green Mineral Resources that owns
the Regina Project (Canada) and Colorado Project (Argentina)
which are in development stage, from Rio Tinto, for US$850.
The acquisition of potash assets is aligned with Vales
strategy to become a large producer of fertilizers to benefit
from the exposure to rising global consumption. The purchase
price allocation for Green Mineral Resources is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation
|
Total disbursements
|
|
|
857
|
|
|
|
Cash acquired
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase price
|
|
|
850
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed, net of
cash acquired
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to fair value of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(1,159
|
)
|
|
|
Deferred taxes on above adjustments
|
|
|
406
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustment
|
|
|
(753
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In September 2009, we concluded an agreement with ThyssenKrupp
Steel AG signed in July, to increase our stake in ThyssenKrupp
CSA Siderúrgica do Atlântico Ltda. (CSA) to 26.87%,
through a capital subscription of US$1,424.
In April 2009, we concluded the sale of all common shares we
held in, Usiminas Siderúrgicas de Minas Gerais
S.A. Usiminas, for US$273 generating a gain of
US$153.
In March 2009, we acquired 50% of the joint venture with African
Rainbow Minerals Limited of Teal Minerals Incorporated for US$60.
In February 2008, we sold our interest in Jubilee Mines N.L.
(held through Vale Inco), representing 4.83% of its common
shares, for US$134 generating a gain of US$80.
Income taxes in Brazil comprise federal income tax and social
contribution, which is an additional federal tax. The statutory
composite enacted tax rate applicable in the periods presented
is 34%. In other countries where we have operations, the
applicable tax rates vary from 1.67% to 40%.
We analyze the potential tax impact associated with
undistributed earnings by each of our subsidiaries. For those
subsidiaries in which the undistributed earnings would be
taxable when remitted to the parent company, but we meet the
criteria in paragraph 12 of APB 23, no deferred tax is
recognized.
F-18
The amount reported as income tax expense in our consolidated
financial statements is reconciled to the statutory rates as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Brazil
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Brazil
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Brazil
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Income before income taxes, equity results and noncontrolling
interests
|
|
|
10,024
|
|
|
|
(2,901
|
)
|
|
|
7,123
|
|
|
|
2,434
|
|
|
|
10,783
|
|
|
|
13,217
|
|
|
|
7,769
|
|
|
|
7,464
|
|
|
|
15,233
|
|
Exchange variation (not taxable) or not deductible
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5,162
|
|
|
|
5,162
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2,887
|
)
|
|
|
(2,887
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
853
|
|
|
|
853
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,024
|
|
|
|
2,261
|
|
|
|
12,285
|
|
|
|
2,434
|
|
|
|
7,896
|
|
|
|
10,330
|
|
|
|
7,769
|
|
|
|
8,317
|
|
|
|
16,086
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax at Brazilian composite rate
|
|
|
(3,408
|
)
|
|
|
(769
|
)
|
|
|
(4,177
|
)
|
|
|
(828
|
)
|
|
|
(2,685
|
)
|
|
|
(3,513
|
)
|
|
|
(2,641
|
)
|
|
|
(2,828
|
)
|
|
|
(5,469
|
)
|
Adjustments to derive effective tax rate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit on interest attributed to stockholders
|
|
|
502
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
502
|
|
|
|
692
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
692
|
|
|
|
474
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
474
|
|
Difference on tax rates of foreign income
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,079
|
|
|
|
1,079
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,728
|
|
|
|
1,728
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,729
|
|
|
|
1,729
|
|
Tax incentives
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
Other non-taxable, income/non deductible expenses
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
505
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
(188
|
)
|
|
|
(108
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes per consolidated statements of income
|
|
|
(2,658
|
)
|
|
|
558
|
|
|
|
(2,100
|
)
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
|
(739
|
)
|
|
|
(535
|
)
|
|
|
(1,914
|
)
|
|
|
(1,287
|
)
|
|
|
(3,201
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vale and some related companies in Brazil were granted with a
tax incentive that provides for a partial reduction of the
income tax due related to certain regional operations of iron
ore, railroad, manganese, copper, bauxite, alumina, aluminum,
kaolin and potash. The tax benefit is calculated based on
taxable profit adjusted by the tax incentive (so-called
exploration profit) taking into consideration the
operational profit of the projects that benefit from the tax
incentive during a fixed period. In general, such tax incentives
expire in 2018. Part of the northern railroad and iron ore
operations have been granted with tax incentives for a period of
10 years starting as from 2009. The tax savings must be
registered in a special capital (profit) reserve in the net
equity of the entity that benefits from the tax incentive and
cannot be distributed as dividends to the stockholders.
We are also allowed to reinvest part of the tax savings in the
acquisition of new equipment to be used in the operations that
enjoy the tax benefit subject to subsequent approval from the
Brazilian regulatory agencies Superintendência de
Desenvolvimento da Amazônia SUDAM and
Superintendência de Desenvolvimento do Nordeste
SUDENE. When the reinvestment is approved, the corresponding tax
benefit must also be accounted in a special profit reserve and
is also subject to the same restrictions with respect to future
dividend distributions to the stockholders.
We also have income tax incentives related to our Goro project
under development in New Caledonia (The Goro
Project). These incentives include an income tax holiday
during the construction phase of the project and throughout a
15-year
period commencing in the first year in which commercial
production, as defined by the applicable legislation, is
achieved followed by a five-year, 50% income tax holiday. The
Goro Project also qualifies for certain exemptions from indirect
taxes such as import duties during the construction phase and
throughout the commercial life of the project. Certain of these
tax benefits, including the income tax holiday, are subject to
an earlier phase out should the project achieve a specified
cumulative rate of return. We are subject to a branch profit tax
commencing in the first year in which commercial production is
achieved, as defined by the applicable legislation. To date, we
have not recorded any taxable income for New Caledonian tax
purposes. The benefits of this legislation are expected to apply
with respect to taxes payable once the Goro Project is in
operation. We obtained tax incentives for its projects in
Mozambique, Oman and Malaysia, that will become effective when
those projects start their commercial operation.
We are subject to examination by the tax authorities for up to
five years regarding our operations in Brazil, up to ten years
for Indonesia, and up to seven years for Canada for income taxes.
Brazilian tax loss carryforwards have no expiration date, though
offset is restricted to 30% of annual taxable income.
On January 1, 2007, Company adopted the provisions
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes.
F-19
The reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts is as
follows: (see note 20(b)) tax related actions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Beginning and end of the period
|
|
|
657
|
|
|
|
1,046
|
|
|
|
663
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase resulting from tax positions taken
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
264
|
|
|
|
Decrease resulting from tax positions taken
|
|
|
(474
|
)
|
|
|
(261
|
)
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
Changes in tax legislation
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
Cumulative translation adjustments
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
(233
|
)
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of the period
|
|
|
396
|
|
|
|
657
|
|
|
|
1,046
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There has been write-off of values provisioned referring to
discussion about compensation for taxes losses and negative
basis of social contribution above 30% due to withdrawal of the
action and therefore the extinction of process with release of
funds deposited in escrow in favor of the Brazilian Unit.
Recognized deferred income tax assets and liabilities are
composed as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Current deferred tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses deductible only when disbursed
|
|
|
852
|
|
|
|
583
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term deferred tax assets and liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee postretirement benefits provision
|
|
|
384
|
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
Tax loss carryforwards
|
|
|
324
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
Other temporary differences
|
|
|
842
|
|
|
|
548
|
|
|
|
Asset retirement obligation
|
|
|
259
|
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,809
|
|
|
|
1,045
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized tax indexation effects
|
|
|
(154
|
)
|
|
|
(108
|
)
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(79
|
)
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
Prepaid retirement benefit
|
|
|
(435
|
)
|
|
|
(199
|
)
|
|
|
Fair value adjustments in business combinations
|
|
|
(5,929
|
)
|
|
|
(4,446
|
)
|
|
|
Social contribution
|
|
|
(758
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
Other temporary differences
|
|
|
(103
|
)
|
|
|
(128
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,458
|
)
|
|
|
(4,928
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
|
(122
|
)
|
|
|
(104
|
)
|
|
|
Translation adjustments
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
Change in allowance
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
|
(106
|
)
|
|
|
(122
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net long-term deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(5,755
|
)
|
|
|
(4,005
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
Cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
728
|
|
|
|
767
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
6,565
|
|
|
|
9,564
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,293
|
|
|
|
10,331
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All the above mentioned short-term investments are made through
the use of low risk fixed income securities, in a way that: the
ones denominated in Brazilian reais are concentrated in
investments indexed to the CDI, and the ones denominated in US
dollars are mainly time deposits, with the original due date
less than three-months.
F-20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Time deposit
|
|
|
3,747
|
|
|
|
2,308
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Represent low risk investments with original due date over
three-month.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Customers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominated in Brazilian Reais
|
|
|
885
|
|
|
|
461
|
|
|
|
Denominated in other currencies, mainly US dollars
|
|
|
2,362
|
|
|
|
2,828
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,247
|
|
|
|
3,289
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(127
|
)
|
|
|
(85
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
3,120
|
|
|
|
3,204
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable from customers in the steel industry
represent 51.1% of receivables at December 31, 2009.
No single customer accounted for more than 10% of total revenues.
Additional allowances for doubtful accounts charged to the
statement of income as expenses in 2009 and 2008 totaled US$48
and US$9, respectively. We wrote-off US$8 in 2009 and US$ nil in
2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Finished products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nickel (co-products and by-products)
|
|
|
1,083
|
|
|
|
1,514
|
|
|
|
Iron ore and pellets
|
|
|
677
|
|
|
|
728
|
|
|
|
Manganese and ferroalloys
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
|
Aluminum products
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
Kaolin
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
Copper concentrate
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
Coal
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
Others
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
Spare parts and maintenance supplies
|
|
|
958
|
|
|
|
1,116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,196
|
|
|
|
3,896
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In 2009, there were no adjustments to reduce inventories to the
market value. In 2008 we recorded an adjustment to reduce nickel
inventory, in an amount of US$77.
F-21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Income tax
|
|
|
908
|
|
|
|
1,646
|
|
|
|
Value-added tax - ICMS
|
|
|
290
|
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
|
PIS and COFINS
|
|
|
1,052
|
|
|
|
380
|
|
|
|
Others
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2,328
|
|
|
|
2,387
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
1,511
|
|
|
|
1,993
|
|
|
|
Non-current
|
|
|
817
|
|
|
|
394
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,328
|
|
|
|
2,387
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
Property, plant
and equipment and intangible assets
|
By type of
assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
4,324
|
|
|
|
1,143
|
|
|
|
3,181
|
|
|
|
3,742
|
|
|
|
905
|
|
|
|
2,837
|
|
Installations
|
|
|
14,063
|
|
|
|
4,160
|
|
|
|
9,903
|
|
|
|
9,990
|
|
|
|
2,748
|
|
|
|
7,242
|
|
Equipment
|
|
|
7,499
|
|
|
|
2,380
|
|
|
|
5,119
|
|
|
|
5,391
|
|
|
|
1,626
|
|
|
|
3,765
|
|
Railroads
|
|
|
6,685
|
|
|
|
2,016
|
|
|
|
4,669
|
|
|
|
5,830
|
|
|
|
1,358
|
|
|
|
4,472
|
|
Mine development costs
|
|
|
20,205
|
|
|
|
2,957
|
|
|
|
17,248
|
|
|
|
15,976
|
|
|
|
2,062
|
|
|
|
13,914
|
|
Others
|
|
|
10,418
|
|
|
|
3,123
|
|
|
|
7,295
|
|
|
|
4,974
|
|
|
|
1,639
|
|
|
|
3,335
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,478
|
|
|
|
15,779
|
|
|
|
47,699
|
|
|
|
46,085
|
|
|
|
10,338
|
|
|
|
35,747
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
19,938
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
19,938
|
|
|
|
12,707
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
12,707
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
83,416
|
|
|
|
15,779
|
|
|
|
67,637
|
|
|
|
58,792
|
|
|
|
10,338
|
|
|
|
48,454
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses on disposal of property, plant and equipment totaled
US$293, US$376 and US$168 in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Mainly relate to losses on sales of ships and trucks,
locomotives and other equipment, which were replaced in the
normal course of business.
Assets given in guarantee of judicial processes totaled US$222
as of December 31, 2009.
Hydroelectric
assets
We participate in several jointly-owned hydroelectric plants,
already in operation or under construction, in which we record
our undivided interest in these assets as property, plant and
equipment.
At December 31, 2009 the cost of hydroelectric plants in
service totaled US$1,382 (December 31, 2008 US$1,162) and
the related depreciation in the year was US$372
(December 31, 2008 US$304). The cost of hydroelectric plant
under construction at December 31, 2009 totaled US$521
(December 31, 2008 US$206). Income and operating expenses
for such plants were not material.
Intangibles
All of the intangible assets recognized in our financial
statements were acquired from third parties, either directly or
through a business combination and have definite useful lives
from 6 to 30 years.
At December 31, 2009 the intangible assets totaled US$1,173
(December 31, 2008 - US$875), and comprised of rights
granted by the government North-South Railroad of
US$924 and off take-agreements of US$239.
F-22
|
|
13
|
Investments in
affiliated companies and joint ventures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings (losses) of investee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
adjustments
|
|
|
Dividends Received
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(loss) of the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
Participation in capital (%)
|
|
|
Net equity
|
|
|
period
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Voting
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ferrous
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Companhia Nipo-Brasileira de Pelotização
NIBRASCO(1)
|
|
|
51.11
|
|
|
|
51.00
|
|
|
|
260
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Companhia Hispano-Brasileira de
Pelotização HISPANOBRÁS(1)
|
|
|
51.00
|
|
|
|
50.89
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Companhia Coreano-Brasileira de
Pelotização KOBRASCO(1)
|
|
|
50.00
|
|
|
|
50.00
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
Companhia Ítalo-Brasileira de
Pelotização ITABRASCO(1)
|
|
|
51.00
|
|
|
|
50.90
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Minas da Serra Geral SA MSG
|
|
|
50.00
|
|
|
|
50.00
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
SAMARCO Mineração SA SAMARCO(2)
|
|
|
50.00
|
|
|
|
50.00
|
|
|
|
1,224
|
|
|
|
598
|
|
|
|
673
|
|
|
|
412
|
|
|
|
299
|
|
|
|
315
|
|
|
|
242
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
Baovale Mineração SA BAOVALE
|
|
|
50.00
|
|
|
|
50.00
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Zhuhai YPM Pellet e Co,Ltd ZHUHAI
|
|
|
25.00
|
|
|
|
25.00
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,111
|
|
|
|
768
|
|
|
|
272
|
|
|
|
550
|
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
319
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
Logistic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LOG-IN Logística Intermodal SA
|
|
|
31.33
|
|
|
|
31.33
|
|
|
|
374
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
MRS Logística SA
|
|
|
37.86
|
|
|
|
41.50
|
|
|
|
1,126
|
|
|
|
340
|
|
|
|
468
|
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
593
|
|
|
|
420
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
Holdings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California Steel Industries Inc CSI
|
|
|
50.00
|
|
|
|
50.00
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
THYSSENKRUPP CSA Companhia Siderúrgica(5)
|
|
|
26.87
|
|
|
|
26.87
|
|
|
|
7,971
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
2,049
|
|
|
|
443
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Usinas Siderúrgicas de Minas Gerais SA
USIMINAS(4)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,199
|
|
|
|
767
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
Bauxite
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mineração Rio do Norte SA MRN
|
|
|
40.00
|
|
|
|
40.00
|
|
|
|
356
|
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
Coal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Henan Longyu Resources Co Ltd
|
|
|
25.00
|
|
|
|
25.00
|
|
|
|
999
|
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
Shandong Yankuang International Company Ltd
|
|
|
25.00
|
|
|
|
25.00
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
243
|
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
Copper
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Teal Minerals Incorporated(3)
|
|
|
50.00
|
|
|
|
50.00
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Nickel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heron Resources Inc (cost US$24) available-for-sale
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Mirabela Nickel Ltd available-for-sale
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Hudbay Minerals available for sale
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Korea Nickel Corp
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Skye Resources
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Others available for sale
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Other affiliates and joint ventures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vale Soluções em Energia
|
|
|
51.00
|
|
|
|
51.00
|
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Others
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,881
|
|
|
|
1,220
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,585
|
|
|
|
2,408
|
|
|
|
433
|
|
|
|
794
|
|
|
|
595
|
|
|
|
386
|
|
|
|
513
|
|
|
|
394
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Although Vale held a majority of the voting interest of
investees accounted for under the equity method, existing veto
rights held by noncontrolling shareholders under shareholder
agreements preclude consolidation;
(2) Investment includes goodwill of US$62 in December, 2009
and US$46 in December, 2008;
(3) Acquired in March, 2009 (Note 5 (d));
(4) Classified as available-for-sale until investment was
sold in April, 2009. Equity refers to dividends received;
(5) See Note 5 (d).
F-23
|
|
14
|
Impairment of
goodwill and long-lived assets
|
As described in note 3(g), we test goodwill and long-lived
assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances
indicate that they might be impaired. For impairment test
purposes goodwill is allocated to reporting units, and are
tested at least annually.
No impairment charges were recognized in 2009 as a result of the
annual goodwill impairment tests performed. In 2008, an
impairment charge, related to nickel operations was recorded in
operating results in the amount of US$950.
Management determined cash flows based on approved financial
budgets. Gross margin projections were based on past performance
and managements expectations of market developments.
Information about sales prices are consistent with the forecasts
included in industry reports, considering quoted prices when
available and when appropriate. The discount rates used reflect
specific risks relating to the relevant assets in each reporting
unit, depending on their composition and location.
Recognition of additional goodwill impairment charges in the
future would depend on several estimates including market
conditions, recent actual results and managements
forecasts. This information shall be obtained at the time when
our assessment is to be updated. It is not possible at this time
to determine if any such future impairment charge would result
or, if it does, whether such charge would be material.
There were no goodwill movements in 2009, expect for the
cumulative translation adjustments.
Short-term borrowings outstanding on December 31, 2009 are
from commercial banks for export financing denominated in US
dollars, with average annual interest rates of 2.02%.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
Long-term liabilities
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Foreign debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and financing denominated in the following currencies:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US dollars
|
|
|
1,543
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
4,332
|
|
|
|
5,905
|
|
Others
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
411
|
|
|
|
167
|
|
Fixed Rate Notes - US dollar denominated
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
8,481
|
|
|
|
6,510
|
|
Debt securities - export sales(*) - US dollar
denominated
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
Perpetual notes
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
Accrued charges
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,920
|
|
|
|
505
|
|
|
|
13,302
|
|
|
|
12,814
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brazilian debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brazilian Reais indexed to Long-term Interest Rate -
TJLP/CDI and General Price Index-Market (IGPM)
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
3,433
|
|
|
|
1,990
|
|
Basket of currencies
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Non-convertible debentures
|
|
|
861
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,592
|
|
|
|
2,562
|
|
US dollars denominated
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
568
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
Accrued charges
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,013
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
6,596
|
|
|
|
4,721
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2,933
|
|
|
|
633
|
|
|
|
19,898
|
|
|
|
17,535
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) Secured by receivables from future export sales.
Redeemed in January, 2010.
F-24
The long-term portion at December 31, 2009 falls due as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2,623
|
|
2012
|
|
|
1,209
|
|
2013
|
|
|
3,250
|
|
2014
|
|
|
925
|
|
2015 and thereafter
|
|
|
11,518
|
|
No due date (Perpetual notes and non-convertible debentures)
|
|
|
373
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,898
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2009 annual interest rates on long-term
debt were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Up to 3%
|
|
|
6,696
|
|
5.1% to 7%
|
|
|
8,148
|
|
7.1% to 9%
|
|
|
5,735
|
|
9.1% to 11%
|
|
|
978
|
|
Over 11%(*)
|
|
|
1,192
|
|
Variable (Perpetual notes)
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,831
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*)
|
Includes non-convertible debentures and other Brazilian Real
denominated debt that bear interest at the Brazilian Interbank
Certificate of Deposit (CDI) and Brazilian Government
Long-term Interest Rates (TJLP) plus a spread. For these
operations we have entered into derivative transactions to
mitigate our exposure to the floating rate debt denominated in
Brazilian Real, totaling US$6,675 of which US$3,949 has original
interest rate between 7.1% and 9% per year the remaining amount
has original interest rate above 9% per year. The average cost
after taking into account the derivative transactions is 4.47%
per year.
|
Vale has non-convertible debentures in Brazilian Reais
denominated as follow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quantity as of December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
Non Convertible Debentures
|
|
Issued
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
Interest
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
1st Series
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
November 20, 2010
|
|
101.75% CDI
|
|
|
869
|
|
|
|
651
|
|
2nd Series
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
November 20, 2013
|
|
100% CDI + 0.25%
|
|
|
2,318
|
|
|
|
1,736
|
|
Tranche B
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
No due date
|
|
6.5% p.a + IGP-DI
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,482
|
|
|
|
2,596
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
861
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Long-term portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,592
|
|
|
|
2,562
|
|
Accrued charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,482
|
|
|
|
2,596
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The indexation indices/rates applied to our debt were as follows
(unaudited):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
TJLP - Long-Term Interest Rate (effective rate)
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
IGP-M - General Price Index - Market
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
|
9.8
|
|
Appreciation (devaluation) of Real against US dollar
|
|
|
34.2
|
|
|
|
(24.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In November, 2009, Vale issued US$1 billion of
30-year
notes through its wholly-owned subsidiary Vale Overseas, fully
and unconditionally guaranteed by Vale. These notes will mature
in November 2039 and will bear a coupon of 6,875% per year,
payable semi-annually, at a price of 98,564% of the principal
amount.
In September, 2009, Vale issued US$1 billion of
10-year
notes through its wholly-owned subsidiary Vale Overseas, fully
and unconditionally guaranteed by Vale. These notes will mature
in September 2019 and will bear a coupon of 5.625% per year,
payable semi-annually, at a price of 99.232% of the principal
amount.
In January 2008 we entered into a trade finance agreement with a
Brazilian bank in the amount of US$1,147 with final maturity in
2018.
F-25
Credit
Lines
In November, 2009, Vale has signed a US$300 export facility
agreement, through its subsidiary PT International Nickel
Indonesia Tbk (PTI), with Japanese financial institutions using
credit insurance provided by Nippon Export and Investment
Insurance NEXI, to finance the construction of the
Karebbe hydroelectric power plant on the Larona river, island of
Sulawesi, Indonesia. Through December 31, 2009, PT
International had drawn down US$150 this facility.
During 2008, we entered into agreements with Banco Nacional de
Desenvolvimento Econômico e Social BNDES, (the
Brazilian National Development Bank) in the amount of
US$4 billion and with Japanese financing agencies in the
amount of US$5 billion, of which US$3 billion with
Japan Bank for International Cooperation JBIC and
US$2 billion with Nippon Export and Investment
Insurance NEXI related to future lines of credit to
finance mining, logistics and power generation projects as part
of our investment program for
2008-2012.
Through December 31, 2009, Vale had drawn down US$892 of
the committed credit facility with BNDES.
Additionally, we have revolving credit lines available under
which amounts can be drawn down and repaid at the option of the
borrower. At December 31, 2009, the total amount available
under revolving credit lines was US$1,900, of which US$1,150 was
granted to Vale International and the balance to Vale Inco. As
of December 31, 2009, neither Vale International nor Vale
Inco had drawn any amounts under these facilities, but US$115 of
letters of credit were issued and remained outstanding pursuant
to Vale Incos facility.
Guarantee
On December 31, 2009, US$753 (December 31,
2008 US$556) of the total aggregate outstanding debt
were secured, being US$152 (December 31, 2008
US$204) guaranteed by receivables from future export sales of
CVRD Overseas Ltd., US$34 (December 31, 2008
US$57) guaranteed by the Brazilian Federal Government and US$567
(December 31, 2008 US$295) guaranteed by other
receivables. The remaining outstanding debt in the amount of
US$22,078 (December 31, 2008 US$17,612) was
unsecured.
Our principal covenants require us to maintain certain ratios,
such as debt to EBITDA and interest coverage. We have not
identified any events of default as of December 31, 2009.
Each holder of common and preferred class A stock is
entitled to one vote for each share on all matters brought
before stockholders meetings, except for the election of
the Board of Directors, which is restricted to the holders of
common stock. The Brazilian Government holds twelve preferred
special shares which confer permanent veto rights over certain
matters.
Both common and preferred stockholders are entitled to receive a
mandatory minimum dividend of 25% of annual adjusted net income
under Brazilian GAAP, once declared at the annual
stockholders meeting. In the case of preferred
stockholders, this dividend cannot be less than 6% of the
preferred capital as stated in the statutory accounting records
or, if greater, 3% of the Brazilian GAAP equity value per share.
In October 2009 the Board of Directors approved the payment of
the second tranche of the minimum dividend, and an amount of
additional dividends to be distributed, totaling US$1,500,
corresponding to US$0.28775711 per common or preferred share in
circulation.
In April 2009, we paid US$1,250 as a first installment of the
dividend to stockholders. The distribution was made in the form
of dividends.
In July 2008, we issued 80,079,223 common ADS, 176,847,543
common shares, 63,506,751 preferred ADS and 100,896,048
preferred shares through a global equity offering. Our capital
increased by US$11,666, upon subscription of preferred stock of
US$4,146 corresponding to 164,402,799 shares and common
stock of US$7,520 corresponding to 256,926,766 shares. In
August, 2008, we issued an additional 24,660,419 preferred
shares, representing an increase of US$628. After the closing of
the operation, our capital stock increased by US$12,294 in 2008;
the transaction costs of US$105 were recorded as a reduction of
the additional paid-in capital account.
F-26
Vale issued mandatory convertible notes, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emission
|
|
|
Expiration
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Net of charges
|
|
|
Coupon
|
Tranches Rio and Rio P
|
|
|
June/2007
|
|
|
|
June/2010
|
|
|
|
1,880
|
|
|
|
1,869
|
|
|
5.50% p.a.
|
Tranches Vale and Vale P - 2012
|
|
|
July/2009
|
|
|
|
June/2012
|
|
|
|
942
|
|
|
|
934
|
|
|
6.75% p.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The notes pay a coupon quarterly and are entitled to an
additional remuneration equivalent to the cash distribution paid
to ADS holders. These notes were classified as a capital
instrument, mainly due to the fact that neither the Company nor
the holders have the option to settle the operation, whether
fully or partially, with cash, and the conversion is mandatory;
consequently, they were recognized as a specific component of
shareholders equity, net of financial charges.
The funds linked to future mandatory conversion, net of charges
are equivalent to the maximum of common shares and preferred
shares, as follows. All the shares are currently held in
treasury.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum amount of action
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Preferred
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Preferred
|
|
Tranches Rio and Rio P
|
|
|
56,582,040
|
|
|
|
30,295,456
|
|
|
|
1,296
|
|
|
|
584
|
|
Tranches Vale and Vale P - 2012
|
|
|
18,415,859
|
|
|
|
47,284,800
|
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
649
|
|
On October 30, 2009, we paid additional interest to holders
of the mandatorily convertible notes of series RIO and
series RIO P, equal to the US dollar equivalent of
R$0.857161 and R$1.017334 per notes, respectively, and to the
holders of the mandatorily convertible notes of
series VALE-2012
and VALE.P-2012, equal to the US dollar equivalent of R$1.236080
and R$1.429662 per notes, respectively.
In April 2009 we paid to holders of the mandatorily convertible
notes of series RIO and series RIO P, the US dollar
equivalent of US$0.490922 and US$0.582658, respectively.
Brazilian law permits the payment of cash dividends only from
retained earnings as stated in BR GAAP statutory records and
such payments are made in Brazilian Reais. Pursuant to the
Companys statutory books, undistributed retained earnings
at December 31, 2009, totaled US$26,150, comprising the
unrealized income and expansion reserves, which could be freely
transferred to retained earnings and paid as dividends, if
approved by the stockholders, after deducting the minimum annual
mandatory dividend.
No withholding tax is payable on distribution of profits earned
except for distributions in the form of interest attributed to
stockholders equity (Note 3 (p)).
F-27
Brazilian laws and our bylaws require that certain
appropriations be made from retained earnings to reserve
accounts on an annual basis, all determined in accordance with
amounts stated in the statutory accounting records, as detailed
below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Undistributed retained earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized income reserve
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of the period
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
Transfer from (to) retained earnings
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of the period
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
Expansion reserve
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of the period
|
|
|
16,809
|
|
|
|
13,881
|
|
|
|
8,485
|
|
Transfer to capital stock
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(3,776
|
)
|
Transfer from (to) retained earnings
|
|
|
9,302
|
|
|
|
2,928
|
|
|
|
9,172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of the period
|
|
|
26,111
|
|
|
|
16,809
|
|
|
|
13,881
|
|
Legal reserve
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of the period
|
|
|
1,448
|
|
|
|
1,310
|
|
|
|
970
|
|
Transfer to capital stock
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(370
|
)
|
Transfer from (to) retained earnings
|
|
|
790
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
710
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of the period
|
|
|
2,238
|
|
|
|
1,448
|
|
|
|
1,310
|
|
Fiscal incentive investment reserve
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of the period
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
Transfer to capital stock
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
Transfer from (to) retained earnings
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of the period
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total undistributed retained earnings
|
|
|
28,508
|
|
|
|
18,340
|
|
|
|
15,317
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The purpose and basis of appropriation to such reserves is
described below:
Unrealized income reserve this represents
principally our share of the earnings of affiliates and joint
ventures, not yet received in the form of cash dividends.
Expansion reserve this is a general reserve for
expansion of our activities.
Legal reserve this reserve is a requirement for all
Brazilian corporations and represents the appropriation of 5% of
annual net income up to a limit of 20% of capital stock all
determined under Brazilian GAAP.
Fiscal incentive investment reserve this reserve
results from an option to designate a portion of income tax
otherwise payable for investment in government approved projects
and is recorded in the year following that in which the taxable
income was earned. As from 2000, this reserve basically
contemplates income tax incentives (Note 6).
F-28
Basic and diluted
earnings per share
Basic and diluted earnings per share amounts have been
calculated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Net income attributable to Companys stockholders
|
|
|
5,349
|
|
|
|
13,218
|
|
|
|
11,825
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest attributed to preferred convertible notes
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
Interest attributed to common convertible notes
|
|
|
(93
|
)
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
Net income for the period adjusted
|
|
|
5,198
|
|
|
|
13,076
|
|
|
|
11,772
|
|
Basic and diluted earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income available to preferred stockholders
|
|
|
1,967
|
|
|
|
5,027
|
|
|
|
4,552
|
|
Income available to common stockholders
|
|
|
3,083
|
|
|
|
7,823
|
|
|
|
7,092
|
|
Income available to convertible notes linked to preferred shares
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
Income available to convertible notes linked to common shares
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding (thousands of
shares) - preferred shares
|
|
|
2,030,700
|
|
|
|
1,946,454
|
|
|
|
1,889,171
|
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding (thousands of
shares) - common shares
|
|
|
3,181,706
|
|
|
|
3,028,817
|
|
|
|
2,943,216
|
|
Treasury preferred shares linked to mandatorily convertible notes
|
|
|
77,580
|
|
|
|
30,295
|
|
|
|
18,478
|
|
Treasury common shares linked to mandatorily convertible notes
|
|
|
74,998
|
|
|
|
56,582
|
|
|
|
34,510
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
5,364,984
|
|
|
|
5,062,148
|
|
|
|
4,885,375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per preferred share
|
|
|
0.97
|
|
|
|
2.58
|
|
|
|
2.41
|
|
Earnings per common share
|
|
|
0.97
|
|
|
|
2.58
|
|
|
|
2.41
|
|
Earnings per convertible notes linked to
preferred share(*)
|
|
|
1.71
|
|
|
|
4.09
|
|
|
|
3.30
|
|
Earnings per convertible notes linked to common share(*)
|
|
|
2.21
|
|
|
|
4.29
|
|
|
|
3.51
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*)
|
Basic earnings per share only, as dilution assumes conversion
|
If the conversion of the convertible notes had been included in
the calculation of diluted earnings per share they would have
generated the following dilutive effect as shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Income available to preferred stockholders
|
|
|
2,100
|
|
|
|
5,151
|
|
|
|
4,613
|
|
Income available to common stockholders
|
|
|
3,249
|
|
|
|
8,067
|
|
|
|
7,212
|
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding (thousands of
shares) - preferred shares
|
|
|
2,108,280
|
|
|
|
1,976,749
|
|
|
|
1,907,649
|
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding (thousands of
shares) - common shares
|
|
|
3,256,704
|
|
|
|
3,085,399
|
|
|
|
2,977,726
|
|
Earnings per preferred share
|
|
|
1.00
|
|
|
|
2.61
|
|
|
|
2.42
|
|
Earnings per common share
|
|
|
1.00
|
|
|
|
2.61
|
|
|
|
2.42
|
|
Since 1973 we sponsor a supplementary social security plan with
characteristics of a defined benefit plan (the Old
Plan) covering substantially all Brazilian employees, with
benefits calculated based on years of service, age, contribution
salary and supplementary social security benefits. This plan is
administered by Fundação Vale do Rio Doce de
Seguridade Social VALIA and was funded by monthly
contributions made by us and our employees, calculated based on
periodic actuarial appraisals.
In May 2000, we implemented a new supplementary social security
plan with characteristics of defined contribution, which
complements the earnings of programmed retirements. The plan
offers benefits to cover death, physical invalidity, and
sickness, with defined benefit characteristics. Brazilian
employees could opt to migrate to the New Plan (a
Benefit Mix Plan Vale Mais) which was taken up by
over 98% of our employees. The Old Plan will continue in
existence, covering almost exclusively retired participants and
their beneficiaries.
F-29
Additionally we provide supplementary payments to a specific
group of former Brazilian employees, in addition to the regular
benefits from Valia. The plan provides postretirement health
care, dental and pharmaceutical benefits.
Upon the acquisition of Inco, we assumed benefits through
defined benefit pension plans that cover essentially all its
employees and post retirement benefits other than pensions that
also provide certain health care and life insurance benefits for
retired employees.
The following information details the status of the defined
benefit elements of all plans in accordance with employers
disclosure about pensions and other post retirement
benefits and employers accounting for defined
benefit pension and other postretirement plans, as amended.
We use a measurement date of December 31 for our pension and
post retirement benefit plans.
|
|
a)
|
Change in benefit
obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Overfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
Overfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
|
pension plans
|
|
|
pension plans
|
|
|
other benefits
|
|
|
pension plans
|
|
|
pension plans
|
|
|
other benefits
|
|
Benefit obligation at beginning of year
|
|
|
2,424
|
|
|
|
3,031
|
|
|
|
1,069
|
|
|
|
3,178
|
|
|
|
4,436
|
|
|
|
1,671
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
313
|
|
|
|
249
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
309
|
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
Plan amendment
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(226
|
)
|
|
|
(279
|
)
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
(283
|
)
|
|
|
(291
|
)
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes
|
|
|
843
|
|
|
|
555
|
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
(779
|
)
|
|
|
(775
|
)
|
|
|
(272
|
)
|
Actuarial loss (gain)
|
|
|
296
|
|
|
|
324
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(660
|
)
|
|
|
(370
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at end of year
|
|
|
3,661
|
|
|
|
3,923
|
|
|
|
1,431
|
|
|
|
2,424
|
|
|
|
3,031
|
|
|
|
1,069
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Overfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
Overfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
|
pension plans
|
|
|
pension plans
|
|
|
other benefits
|
|
|
pension plans
|
|
|
pension plans
|
|
|
other benefits
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year
|
|
|
3,043
|
|
|
|
2,507
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
4,187
|
|
|
|
3,762
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
1,121
|
|
|
|
402
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
(603
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
Employer contributions
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
272
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(226
|
)
|
|
|
(279
|
)
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
(283
|
)
|
|
|
(291
|
)
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes
|
|
|
1,018
|
|
|
|
444
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(959
|
)
|
|
|
(633
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at end of year
|
|
|
4,996
|
|
|
|
3,229
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
3,043
|
|
|
|
2,507
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan assets at December 31, 2009 included US$587 (US$188 at
December 31, 2008) and US$69 (US$53 at
December 31, 2008) of portfolio investments in our own
shares and debentures, respectively, and US$64 (US$44 at
December 31, 2008) of shares of related parties. They
also included US$3,261 of Brazilian Federal Government
securities (US$2,472 at December 31, 2008) and US$391
of Canada Federal Government securities (US$347 at
December 31, 2008).
|
|
c)
|
Funded Status and
Financial Position
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Overfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
Overfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
|
pension plans
|
|
|
pension plans
|
|
|
other benefits
|
|
|
pension plans
|
|
|
pension plans
|
|
|
other benefits
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
1,335
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
619
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
Non-current liabilities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
632
|
|
|
|
1,338
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
486
|
|
|
|
999
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status
|
|
|
1,335
|
|
|
|
694
|
|
|
|
1,420
|
|
|
|
619
|
|
|
|
524
|
|
|
|
1,060
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-30
|
|
d)
|
Assumptions used
(nominal terms)
|
Brazil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Overfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
Overfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
|
pension plans
|
|
|
pension plans
|
|
|
other benefits
|
|
|
pension plans
|
|
|
pension plans
|
|
|
other benefits
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
11.08% p.a.
|
|
|
|
11.08% p.a.
|
|
|
|
11.08% p.a.
|
|
|
|
11.28% p.a.
|
|
|
|
11.28% p.a.
|
|
|
|
11.28% p.a.
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
12.00% p.a.
|
|
|
|
11.50% p.a.
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
12.22% p.a.
|
|
|
|
13.00% p.a.
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Rate of compensation increase - up to 47 years
|
|
|
7.64% p.a.
|
|
|
|
7.64% p.a.
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
7.12% p.a.
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Rate of compensation increase - over 47 years
|
|
|
4.50% p.a.
|
|
|
|
4.50% p.a.
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4.00% p.a.
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Inflation
|
|
|
4.50% p.a.
|
|
|
|
4.50% p.a.
|
|
|
|
4.50% p.a.
|
|
|
|
4.00% p.a.
|
|
|
|
4.00% p.a.
|
|
|
|
4.00% p.a.
|
|
Health care cost trend rate
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
7.63% p.a.
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
7.12% p.a.
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded other
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pension plans
|
|
|
benefits
|
|
|
pension plans
|
|
|
benefits
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
6.21% p.a.
|
|
|
|
6.20% p.a.
|
|
|
|
5.58% p.a.
|
|
|
|
7.32% p.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
7.00% p.a.
|
|
|
|
6.23% p.a.
|
|
|
|
6.99% p.a.
|
|
|
|
7.35% p.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate of compensation increase - up to 47 years
|
|
|
4.11% p.a.
|
|
|
|
3.58% p.a.
|
|
|
|
4.12% p.a.
|
|
|
|
3.58% p.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate of compensation increase - over 47 years
|
|
|
4.11% p.a.
|
|
|
|
3.58% p.a.
|
|
|
|
4.12% p.a.
|
|
|
|
3.58% p.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inflation
|
|
|
2.00% p.a.
|
|
|
|
2.00% p.a.
|
|
|
|
2.00% p.a.
|
|
|
|
2.00% p.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health care cost trend rate
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
6.04% p.a.
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
6.19% p.a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected returns for all plans assets are generated within
the framework of a long term macroeconomic scenario provided by
Tendencias Consultoria and an ALM - Asset Liability Modelling
study prepared by Mercer Consulting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Overfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
Overfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
|
pension
|
|
|
pension
|
|
|
other
|
|
|
pension
|
|
|
pension
|
|
|
other
|
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
benefits
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
benefits
|
|
Service cost - benefits earned during the year
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation
|
|
|
313
|
|
|
|
255
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
309
|
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
Expected return on assets
|
|
|
(431
|
)
|
|
|
(202
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(515
|
)
|
|
|
(253
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Amortizations and (gain) / loss
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Net deferral
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension cost (credit)
|
|
|
(93
|
)
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
(185
|
)
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
f)
|
Accumulated
benefit obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Overfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
Overfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
|
pension plans
|
|
|
pension plans
|
|
|
other benefits
|
|
|
pension plans
|
|
|
pension plans
|
|
|
other benefits
|
|
Accumulated benefit obligation
|
|
|
3,645
|
|
|
|
3,826
|
|
|
|
1,431
|
|
|
|
2,415
|
|
|
|
2,955
|
|
|
|
1,069
|
|
Projected benefit obligation
|
|
|
3,661
|
|
|
|
3,923
|
|
|
|
1,431
|
|
|
|
2,424
|
|
|
|
3,031
|
|
|
|
1,069
|
|
Fair value of plan assets
|
|
|
(4,996
|
)
|
|
|
(3,229
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(3,043
|
)
|
|
|
(2,507
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
g)
|
Impact of 1%
variation in assumed health care cost trend rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1% increase
|
|
|
1% decrease
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Overfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
Overfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
|
pension plans
|
|
|
pension plans
|
|
|
pension plans
|
|
|
pension plans
|
|
Accumulated postretirement benefit obligation (APBO)
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
(163
|
)
|
|
|
(110
|
)
|
Interest and service costs
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-31
|
|
h)
|
Other Cumulative
Comprehensive Income (Deficit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Overfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
Overfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
|
pension plans
|
|
|
pension plans
|
|
|
other benefits
|
|
|
pension plans
|
|
|
pension plans
|
|
|
other benefits
|
|
Net transition (obligation) / asset
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Net actuarial (loss) / gain
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
(338
|
)
|
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
|
|
(240
|
)
|
|
|
|
(206
|
)
|
|
|
|
402
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes
|
|
|
(91
|
)
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
Deferred income tax
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
(146
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts recognized in other cumulative comprehensive income
(deficit)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
(234
|
)
|
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
|
|
(180
|
)
|
|
|
|
(113
|
)
|
|
|
|
259
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
i)
|
Change in Other
Cumulative Comprehensive Income (Deficit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Overfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
Overfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
|
pension plans
|
|
|
pension plans
|
|
|
other benefits
|
|
|
pension plans
|
|
|
pension plans
|
|
|
other benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net transition (obligation) / asset not yet recognized in NPPC
at beginning of the year
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net actuarial (loss) / gain not yet recognized in NPPC at
beginning of the year
|
|
|
(261
|
)
|
|
|
|
(196
|
)
|
|
|
|
406
|
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax at beginning of the year
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
(147
|
)
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of initial recognition of cumulative comprehensive
Income (deficit)
|
|
|
(180
|
)
|
|
|
|
(113
|
)
|
|
|
|
259
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of net transition (obligation) / asset
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of net actuarial (loss) / gain
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net actuarial (loss) / gain arising during the year
|
|
|
340
|
|
|
|
|
(112
|
)
|
|
|
|
(142
|
)
|
|
|
|
(328
|
)
|
|
|
|
(165
|
)
|
|
|
|
307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes
|
|
|
(91
|
)
|
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax
|
|
|
(90
|
)
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
(111
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recognized in other cumulative comprehensive income
(deficit)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
(234
|
)
|
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
|
|
(180
|
)
|
|
|
|
(113
|
)
|
|
|
|
259
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brazilian
Plans
The Investment Policy Statements of pension plans sponsored for
Brazilian employees are based on a long term macroeconomic
scenario and expected returns built by Tendências
Consultoria and an ALM Asset Liability Modeling
study prepared by Mercer Consulting. An Investment Policy
Statement was established for each obligation by following
results of this strategic asset allocation study (ALM) in 2009.
Plans asset allocations comply with pension funds local
regulation issued by CMN Conselho Monetário
Nacional (Resolução CMN 3792/09). We are allowed to
invest in six different asset classes, defined as segments by
the law, as follows: Fixed Income, Equity, Structured
Investments (Alternative Investments and Infra-Structure
Projects), International Investments, Real Estate and Loans to
Participants.
The Investment Policy Statements are approved by the Board, the
Executive Directors and two Investments Committees. The internal
and external portfolio managers are allowed to exercise the
investment discretion under the limitations imposed by the Board
and the Investment Committees.
The pension fund has a risk management process with established
policies that intend to identify measure and control all kinds
of risks faced by our plans, such as: market, liquidity, credit,
operational, systemic and legal.
Foreign
plans
The strategy for each of the pension plans sponsored by Vale
Inco is based upon a combination of local practices and the
specific characteristics of the pension plans in each country,
including the structure of the liabilities, the risk versus
reward trade-off between different asset classes and the
liquidity required to meet benefit payments.
F-32
Overfunded
pension plans
Brazilian
Plans
The Defined Benefit Plan (the Old Plan) has the
majority of its assets allocated in fixed income, mainly in
Brazilian government bonds (like TIPS) and corporate long term
inflation linked bonds with the objective to reduce the
asset-liability volatility. The target is 55% of the total
assets. This LDI (Liability Driven Investments) strategy, when
considered together with Loans to Participants segment, aims to
hedge plans liabilities against inflation risk and
volatility. Other segments or asset classes have their targets,
as follows: Equity 28%; Structured
Investments 5%; International
Investments 2%; Real estate 6% and Loans
to Participants 4%. Structured Investments segment
has invested only in Private Equity Funds in an amount of US$87
and US$67 at the end of December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
The Investment Policy has the objective to achieve the adequate
diversification, current income and long term capital growth
through the combination of all asset classes described above to
fulfill its obligations with the adequate level of risk. This
plan has an average nominal return of 21.3% p.a. in dollars
terms in the last 10 years.
The Vale Mais Plan (the New Plan) has obligations
with characteristics of defined benefit and defined contribution
plans, as mentioned. The majority of its investments is in fixed
income. It was also implemented a LDI (Liability Driven
Investments) strategy to reduce asset-liability volatility of
the defined benefits plans component by using inflation
linked bonds (like TIPS). The target allocation is 60% in fixed
income. Other segments or asset classes have their targets, as
follows: Equity 24%; Structured
Investments 2%; International
Investments 2%; Real estate 3% and Loans
to Participants 10%. Structured Investments segment
has invested only in Private Equity Funds in an amount of US$10
and US$5 at the end of December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
The Defined Contribution Vale Mais component offers three
options of asset classes mix that can be chosen by participants.
The options are: Fixed Income 100%; 80% Fixed Income
and 20% Equities and 65% Fixed Income and 35% Equities. Equity
option is an indexed- fund that has the Bovespa Index as a
benchmark.
The Investment Policy Statement has the objective to achieve the
adequate diversification, current income and long term capital
growth through the combination of all asset classes described
above to fulfill its obligations and targets with the adequate
level of risk. This plan has an average nominal return of 20%
p.a. in dollars terms in the last 10 years.
- Fair value
measurements by category - Overfunded Plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Asset by category
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Accounts Receivable
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Equity securities - liquid
|
|
|
1,303
|
|
|
|
1,303
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
461
|
|
|
|
461
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Equity securities - non-liquid
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Debt securities - Corporate bonds
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Debt securities - Financial Institutions
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Debt securities - Government bonds
|
|
|
1,744
|
|
|
|
1,744
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,109
|
|
|
|
1,109
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Investment funds - Fixed Income
|
|
|
2,037
|
|
|
|
2,037
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,361
|
|
|
|
1,361
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Investment funds - Equity
|
|
|
577
|
|
|
|
577
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Investment funds - Private Equity
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
Real estate
|
|
|
249
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
249
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
Loans to Participants
|
|
|
282
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
282
|
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
6,739
|
|
|
|
5,678
|
|
|
|
433
|
|
|
|
628
|
|
|
|
4,026
|
|
|
|
3,152
|
|
|
|
418
|
|
|
|
456
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds not related to risk plans
|
|
|
(1,743
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(983
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at end of year
|
|
|
4,996
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,043
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-33
- Fair value
measurements using significant unobservable inputs
Level 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Private
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans to
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds
|
|
|
Real State
|
|
|
Participants
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Funds
|
|
|
Real State
|
|
|
Participants
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of the year
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
457
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
458
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets sold during the year
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(112
|
)
|
|
|
(180
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets purchased, sales and settlements
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative translations adjustment
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
(111
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of the year
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
249
|
|
|
|
282
|
|
|
|
628
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
457
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The return target for private equity assets in 2010 is 10.20%.
The target allocation is 5%, ranging between 2% and 10%. These
investments have a longer investment horizon and low liquidity
that aim to profit from economic growth, especially in the
infra-structure sector of the Brazilian economy. Usually
non-liquid assets fair value is established considering:
acquisition cost or book value. Some private equity funds may,
alternatively, apply the following methodologies: discounted
cash flows analysis or analysis based on multiples.
The return target for loans to participants in 2010 is 11,90%.
The fair value pricing of these assets includes provisions for
non-paid loans, according to the local pension fund regulation.
The return target for real estate assets in 2010 is 9,90%. Fair
value for these assets is considered book value. The pension
fund hires companies specialized in real estate valuation that
do not act in the market as brokers. All valuation techniques
follow the local regulation.
Underfunded
pension plans
Brazilian
Obligation
This obligation has an exclusive allocation in fixed income. It
was also used a LDI (Liability Driven Investments) strategy for
this plan. Most of the resources were invested in long term
government and corporate inflation linked bonds with the
objective to minimize asset-liability volatility and reduce
inflation risk.
The Investment Policy Statement has the objective to achieve the
adequate diversification, current income and long term capital
growth through the combination of all asset classes described
above to fulfill its obligations with the adequate level of
risk. This obligation has an average nominal return of 22.8%
p.a. in dollars terms in the last 8 years.
Foreign
plans
For all pension plans except PT Inco, this has resulted in a
target asset allocation of 60% in equity investments and 40% in
fixed income investments, with all securities being traded in
the public markets. Fixed income investments are in domestic
bonds for each plans market and involve a mixture of
government and corporate bonds. Equity investments are primarily
global in nature and involve a mixture of large, mid and small
capitalization companies with a modest explicit investment in
domestic equities for each plan. The Canadian plans also use a
currency hedging strategy (each developed currencys
exposure is 50% hedged) due to the large exposure to foreign
securities. For PT Inco, the target allocation is 20% equity
investment and the remainder in fixed income, with the vast
majority of these investments being made within the domestic
market.
F-34
- Fair value
measurements by category - Underfunded Pension
Plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Asset by category
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Equity securities - liquid
|
|
|
1,347
|
|
|
|
1,347
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Equity securities - non-liquid
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
836
|
|
|
|
836
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Debt securities - Corporate bonds
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Debt securities - Financial Institutions
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Debt securities - Government bonds
|
|
|
445
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
395
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Investment funds - Fixed Income
|
|
|
988
|
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
|
701
|
|
|
|
391
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
350
|
|
Investment funds - Equity
|
|
|
409
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
322
|
|
|
|
839
|
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
660
|
|
Investment funds - Private Equity
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
342
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
3,253
|
|
|
|
1,783
|
|
|
|
1,470
|
|
|
|
2,529
|
|
|
|
1,133
|
|
|
|
1,396
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds not related to risk plans
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at end of year
|
|
|
3,229
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,507
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underfunded other
benefits
- Fair value
measurements by category Other Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Asset by category
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
k)
|
Cash flows
contributions
|
Employer contributions expected for 2010 are US$240.
|
|
l)
|
Estimated future
benefit payments
|
The benefit payments, which reflect future service, are expected
to be made as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Overfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
Underfunded
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pension plans
|
|
|
pension plans
|
|
|
other benefits
|
|
|
Total
|
|
2010
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
311
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
670
|
|
2011
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
313
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
680
|
|
2012
|
|
|
282
|
|
|
|
311
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
684
|
|
2013
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
|
308
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
686
|
|
2014
|
|
|
285
|
|
|
|
302
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
684
|
|
2015 and thereafter
|
|
|
1,434
|
|
|
|
1,454
|
|
|
|
479
|
|
|
|
3,367
|
|
|
|
19
|
Long-term
incentive compensation plan
|
Since 2008, a long-term incentive compensation plan, was
implemented.
Under the terms of the plan, the participants, restricted to
certain executives, may elect to allocate part of their annual
bonus to the plan. The allocation is applied to purchase
preferred shares of Vale, through a predefined financial
institution, at market conditions and with no benefit provided
by Vale.
The shares purchased by each executive are unrestricted and may,
at the participants discretion, be sold at any time.
However, the shares must be held for a three-year period and the
executive must be continually employed by Vale during that
period. The participant then becomes entitled to receive from
Vale a cash payment equivalent to the total amount of shares
held, based on their market rates. The total shares linked to
the plan at December 31, 2009 and 2008, were 1,809,117 and
711,005, respectively.
F-35
Additionally, as a long-term incentive certain eligible
executives have the opportunity to receive at the end of the
three-year cycle a certain number of shares at market rates,
based on an evaluation of their career and performance factors
measured as an indicator of total return to stockholders.
We account for the compensation cost provided to our executives
under this long-term incentive compensation plan, following the
requirements Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.
Liabilities are measured at each reporting date at fair value,
based on market rates. Compensation costs incurred are
recognized, over the defined three-year vesting period. At
December 31, 2009 and 2008, we recognized a liability of
US$72 and US$7, respectively, through the Statement of Income.
|
|
20
|
Commitments and
contingencies
|
a) In connection with a tax-advantaged lease
financing arrangement sponsored by the French Government, we
provided certain guarantees on behalf of Vale Inco New
Caledônia (VINC) pursuant to which we guaranteed payments
due from VINC of up to a maximum amount of US$100 (Maximum
Amount) in connection with an indemnity. We also provided
an additional guarantee covering the payments due from VINC of
(a) amounts exceeding the Maximum Amount in connection with
the indemnity and (b) certain other amounts payable by VINC
under a lease agreement covering certain assets.
During the second quarter two new bank guarantees totaling US$62
(43) were established by us on behalf of VINC in favour of
the South Province of New Caledonia in order to guarantee the
performance of VINC with respect to certain environmental
obligations in relation to the metallurgical plant and the Kwe
West residue storage facility.
Sumic Nickel Netherlands B.V., a 21% stockholder of VINC, has a
put option to sell us 25%, 50%, or 100% of the shares they own
of VINC. The put option can be exercised if the defined cost of
the nickel-cobalt development project exceeds a value agreed
between the shareholders at project rates and an agreement
cannot be reached on how to proceed with the project.
We provided a guarantee covering certain termination payments
due from VINC to the supplier under an electricity supply
agreement (ESA) entered into in October 2004 for the
VINC project. The amount of the termination payments guaranteed
depends upon a number of factors, including whether any
termination of the ESA is a result of a default by VINC and the
date on which an early termination of the ESA were to occur. If
VINC defaults under the ESA prior to the anticipated start date
for supply of electricity to the project, the termination
payment, which currently is at its maximum, would be US$209
(145). Once the supply of electricity under the ESA to the
project begins, the guaranteed amounts will decrease over the
life of the ESA.
In February 2009, we and our subsidiary, Vale Inco Newfoundland
and Labrador Limited (VINL), entered into a fourth
amendment to the Voiseys Bay Development agreement with
the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada, that
permitted VINL to ship up to 55,000 metric tons of nickel
concentrate from the Voiseys Bay area mines. As part of
the agreement, VINL agreed to provide the Government of
Newfoundland and Labrador financial assurance in the form of
letters of credit each in the amount of Canadian US$17 (CAD$16)
for each shipment of nickel concentrate shipped out of the
province from January 1, 2009 to August 31, 2009. The
amount of this financial assurance was Canadian US$118 (CAD$112)
based on seven shipments of nickel concentrate and as of
December 31, 2009, US$65 (CAD$62) remains outstanding.
As of December 31, 2009, there was an additional US$154 of
letters of credit issued and outstanding as US$47 in additional
bank guarantees. These are associated with environmental
reclamation and other operating associated items such as
insurance, electricity commitments and import and export duties.
b) We and our subsidiaries are defendants in
numerous legal actions in the normal course of business. Based
on the advice of our legal counsel, management believes that the
amounts recognized are sufficient to cover probable losses in
connection with such actions.
F-36
The provision for contingencies and the related judicial
deposits are composed as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Provision for
|
|
|
Judicial
|
|
|
Provision for
|
|
|
Judicial
|
|
|
|
contingencies
|
|
|
deposits
|
|
|
contingencies
|
|
|
deposits
|
|
Labor and social security claims
|
|
|
657
|
|
|
|
657
|
|
|
|
458
|
|
|
|
378
|
|
Civil claims
|
|
|
582
|
|
|
|
307
|
|
|
|
386
|
|
|
|
242
|
|
Tax - related actions
|
|
|
489
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
828
|
|
|
|
518
|
|
Others
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,763
|
|
|
|
1,143
|
|
|
|
1,685
|
|
|
|
1,141
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Labor and social security related actions
principally comprise claims by Brazilian employees and former
employees for (i) payment of time spent traveling from
their residence to the work-place, (ii) additional health
and safety related payments and (iii) various other
matters, often in connection with disputes about the amount of
indemnities paid upon dismissal and the one-third extra holiday
pay.
Civil actions principally related to claims made
against us by contractors in Brazil in connection with losses
alleged to have been incurred by them as a result of various
past Government economic plans during which full inflation
indexation of contracts was not permitted, as well, as for
accidents and land appropriation disputes.
Tax tax-related actions principally comprise
challenges initiated by us, on certain taxes on revenues and
uncertain tax positions. We continue to vigorously pursue our
interests in all the above actions but recognize that we
probably will incur some losses in the final instance, for which
we have made provisions.
Judicial deposits are made by us following the court
requirements, in order to be entitled to either initiate or
continue a legal action. These amounts are released to us, upon
receipt of a final favorable outcome from the legal action; in
the case of an unfavorable outcome, the deposits are transferred
to the prevailing party.
Contingencies settled during the years ended December 31,
2009, 2008 and 2007, totaled US$236, US$148 and US$331,
respectively. Provisions recognized in the years ended
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, totaled US$294, US$213
and US$364, respectively, classified as other operating expenses.
In addition to the contingencies for which we have made
provisions we are defendants in claims where in our opinion, and
based on the advice of our legal counsel, the likelihood of loss
is possible but not probable, in the total amount of US$4,190 at
December 31, 2009, and for which no provision has been made
(December 31, 2008 US$2,476).
c) At the time of our privatization in 1997, the
Company issued debentures to its then-existing stockholders,
including the Brazilian Government. The terms of the debentures,
were set to ensure that the pre-privatization stockholders,
including the Brazilian Government would participate in possible
future financial benefits that could be obtained from exploiting
certain mineral resources.
A total of 388,559,056 debentures were issued at a par value of
R$0.01 (one cent), whose value will be restated in accordance
with the variation in the General Market Price Index (IGP-M), as
set forth in the Issue Deed.
The debentures holders have the right to receive premiums, paid
semiannually, equivalent to a percentage of net revenues from
specific mine resources as set forth in the indenture.
In September and April 2009 we paid remuneration on these
debentures of US$4 and US$3, respectively. During 2009, we paid
a total of US$7.
d) We are committed under a take-or-pay agreement to
purchase approximately 30,425 thousand metric tons of bauxite
from Mineração Rio do Norte S.A. MRN at a
formula driven price, calculated based on the current London
Metal Exchange LME quotation for aluminum. Based on
a market price of US$28.71 per metric ton as of
F-37
December 31, 2009, this arrangement represented the
following total commitment per metric ton as of
December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
195
|
|
2011
|
|
|
166
|
|
2012
|
|
|
169
|
|
2013
|
|
|
172
|
|
2014
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
874
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
e)
|
Description of
Leasing Arrangements
|
Part of our railroad operations include leased facilities. The
30-year
lease, renewable for a further 30 years, expires in August,
2026 and is classified as an operating lease. At the end of the
lease term, we are required to return the concession and the
lease assets. In most cases, management expects that in the
normal course of business, leases will be renewed.
The following is a schedule by year of future minimum rental
payments required under the railroad operating leases that have
initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one
year as of December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
80
|
|
2011
|
|
|
80
|
|
2012
|
|
|
80
|
|
2013
|
|
|
80
|
|
2014 thereafter
|
|
|
1,018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum payments required
|
|
|
1,338
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total expenses of operating leases for the years ended
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 was US$80, US$53 and
US$62, respectively.
During 2008, we entered into operating lease agreements with our
joint ventures Nibrasco, Itabrasco and Kobrasco, under which we
leased four pellet plants. The lease terms are from 5 to
30 years.
The following is a schedule by year of future minimum rental
payments required under the pellet plants operating leases that
have initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess
of one year as of December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
114
|
|
2011
|
|
|
114
|
|
2012
|
|
|
114
|
|
2013
|
|
|
114
|
|
2014 thereafter
|
|
|
1,313
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,769
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total expenses of operating leases for the years ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008 was US$114 and US$49,
respectively.
|
|
f)
|
Assets retirement
obligations
|
We use various judgments and assumptions when measuring our
asset retirement obligations.
Changes in circumstances, law or technology may affect our
estimates and we periodically review the amounts accrued and
adjust them as necessary. Our accruals do not reflect unasserted
claims because we are currently not aware of any such issues.
Also the amounts provided are not reduced by any potential
recoveries under cost sharing, insurance or indemnification
arrangements because such recoveries are considered uncertain.
F-38
The changes in the provisions for asset retirement obligations
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Beginning of period
|
|
|
887
|
|
|
|
975
|
|
|
|
676
|
|
|
|
Accretion expense
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
Liabilities settled in the current period
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
Revisions in estimated cash flows
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
Cumulative translation adjustment
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
(198
|
)
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period
|
|
|
1,116
|
|
|
|
887
|
|
|
|
975
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
Non-current liabilities
|
|
|
1,027
|
|
|
|
839
|
|
|
|
911
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,116
|
|
|
|
887
|
|
|
|
975
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The line Other operating expenses totaled US$1,522
in 2009 (US$1,254 in 2008). The expenses of approximately US$880
related to idle capacity and stoppage of operations during the
downturn period in the economy is the most significant item
recorded in 2009.
|
|
22
|
Fair value
disclosure of financial assets and liabilities
|
The Financial Accounting Standards Board, through Accounting
Standards Codification and Accounting Standards Updates, define
fair value, set out a framework for measuring fair value, which
refers to valuation concepts and practices and require certain
disclosures about fair value measurements.
The pronouncements define fair value as the exchange price that
would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability
(an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for
the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market
participants on the measurement date. In determining fair value,
the Company uses various methods including market, income and
cost approaches. Based on these approaches, the Company often
utilizes certain assumptions that market participants would use
in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about
risk and or the risks inherent in the inputs to the valuation
technique.
These inputs can be readily observable, market corroborated, or
generally unobservable inputs. The Company utilizes techniques
that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use
of unobservable inputs. Under this standard, those inputs used
to measure the fair value are required to be classified on three
levels. Based on the characteristics of the inputs used in
valuation techniques the Company is required to provide the
following information according to the fair value hierarchy. The
fair value hierarchy ranks the quality and reliability of the
information used to determine fair values. Financial assets and
liabilities carried at fair value are classified and disclosed
as follows:
Level 1 Unadjusted quoted prices on an
active, liquid and visible market for identical assets or
liabilities that are accessible at the measurement date;
Level 2 Quoted prices for identical or
similar assets or liabilities on active markets, inputs other
than quoted prices that are observable, either directly or
indirectly, for the term of the asset or liability;
Level 3 Assets and liabilities, which
quoted prices, do not exist, or those prices or valuation
techniques are supported by little or no market activity,
unobservable or illiquid. At this point fair market valuation
becomes highly subjective.
F-39
|
|
b)
|
Measurements on a
recurring basis
|
The description of the valuation methodologies used for
recurring assets and liabilities measured at fair value in the
Companys Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31,
2009 and 2008 are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale securities
|
They are securities that are not classified either as
held-for-trading or as held-to-maturity for strategic reasons
and have readily available market prices. We evaluate the
carrying value of some of our investments in relation to
publicly quoted market prices when available. When there is no
market value, we use inputs other than quoted prices.
The market approach is used for the swaps to estimate the fair
value discounting their cash flows using the interest rate of
the currency they are denominated. Also for the commodities
contracts, since the fair value is computed by using forward
curves for each commodities.
|
|
|
|
|
Other Financial Liabilities
|
Comprise stockholders debentures, which have their fair
value measured by the market approach method, and their
reference price is available on the secondary market.
The tables below present the balances of assets and liabilities
measured at fair value on a recurring basis as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carry amount
|
|
|
Fair value
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain on derivatives
|
|
|
832
|
|
|
|
832
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
832
|
|
|
|
Other financial liabilities
|
|
|
(750
|
)
|
|
|
(750
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(750
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carry amount
|
|
|
Fair value
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
639
|
|
|
|
639
|
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
|
443
|
|
|
|
Unrealized losses on derivatives
|
|
|
(539
|
)
|
|
|
(539
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(539
|
)
|
|
|
Other financial liabilities
|
|
|
(380
|
)
|
|
|
(380
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(380
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
c)
|
Measurements on a
non-recurring basis
|
The Company also has assets under certain conditions that are
subject to measurement at fair value on a non-recurring basis.
These assets include goodwill and intangible assets. During the
year ended December 31, 2009 we have not recognized any
additional impairment losses for those items.
Long-term
debt
The valuation method used to estimate the fair value of our debt
is the market approach for the contracts that are quoted on the
secondary market, such as bonds and debentures. The fair value
of both fixed and floating rate debt is determined by
discounting future cash flows of LIBOR and Vales bond
curves (income approach).
Time
deposits
The method used is the income approach, through the prices
available on the active market. The fair value is close to the
carrying amount due to the short-term maturities of the
instruments.
F-40
Our long-term debt is reported at amortized cost, and the income
of time deposits is accrued monthly according to the contract
rate, however its estimated fair value measurement is disclosed
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carry
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
amount
|
|
|
Fair value
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
|
Time deposits
|
|
|
3,747
|
|
|
|
3,747
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,747
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt (less interests)(*)
|
|
|
(22,544
|
)
|
|
|
(23,344
|
)
|
|
|
(12,424
|
)
|
|
|
(10,920
|
)
|
|
|
(*) Less accrued charges US$287
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carry
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
amount
|
|
|
Fair value
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
|
Time deposits
|
|
|
2,308
|
|
|
|
2,308
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,308
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt (less interests)(*)
|
|
|
(17,857
|
)
|
|
|
(16,635
|
)
|
|
|
(7,833
|
)
|
|
|
(8,802
|
)
|
|
|
(*) Less accrued charges US$311
|
|
|
23
|
Segment and
geographical information
|
We adopt disclosures about segments of an enterprise and related
information with respect to the information we present about our
operating segments. The standard introduced a management
approach concept for reporting segment information,
whereby such information is required to be reported on the basis
that the chief decision-maker uses internally for evaluating
segment performance and deciding how to allocate resources to
segments. We analyze our segment information on an aggregated
and disaggregated basis as follows:
Ferrous products comprises iron ore mining
and pellet production, as well as our Brazilian Northern and
Southern transportation systems, including railroads, ports and
terminals, as they pertain to mining operations. Manganese
mining and ferroalloys are also included in this segment.
Non-ferrous comprises the production of
non-ferrous minerals, including nickel (co-products and
by-products), potash, kaolin, copper and aluminum -
comprises aluminum trading activities, alumina refining and
aluminum metal smelting and investments in joint ventures and
affiliates engaged in bauxite mining.
Logistics comprises our transportation
systems as they pertain to the operation of our ships, ports and
railroads for third-party cargos.
Others comprises our investments in joint
ventures and affiliates engaged in other businesses.
Information presented to senior management with respect to the
performance of each segment is generally derived directly from
the accounting records maintained in accordance with accounting
practices adopted in Brazil together with certain minor
inter-segment allocations.
F-41
Consolidated net income and principal assets are reconciled as
follows:
Results by segment before eliminations
(aggregated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) Non
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) Non
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) Non
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RESULTS
|
|
Ferrous
|
|
|
ferrous
|
|
|
Logistic
|
|
|
Others
|
|
|
Elimination
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Ferrous
|
|
|
ferrous
|
|
|
Logistic
|
|
|
Others
|
|
|
Elimination
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Ferrous
|
|
|
ferrous
|
|
|
Logistic
|
|
|
Others
|
|
|
Elimination
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
Gross revenues - Foreign
|
|
|
23,656
|
|
|
|
8,151
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
562
|
|
|
|
(12,152
|
)
|
|
|
20,284
|
|
|
|
33,369
|
|
|
|
13,668
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
588
|
|
|
|
(15,842
|
)
|
|
|
31,834
|
|
|
|
21,126
|
|
|
|
16,844
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
242
|
|
|
|
(10,437
|
)
|
|
|
27,836
|
|
Gross revenues - Domestic
|
|
|
1,779
|
|
|
|
1,148
|
|
|
|
1,101
|
|
|
|
389
|
|
|
|
(762
|
)
|
|
|
3,655
|
|
|
|
4,342
|
|
|
|
1,341
|
|
|
|
1,640
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
(882
|
)
|
|
|
6,675
|
|
|
|
3,865
|
|
|
|
1,238
|
|
|
|
1,519
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(1,344
|
)
|
|
|
5,279
|
|
Cost and expenses
|
|
|
(17,374
|
)
|
|
|
(7,927
|
)
|
|
|
(876
|
)
|
|
|
(916
|
)
|
|
|
12,914
|
|
|
|
(14,179
|
)
|
|
|
(24,143
|
)
|
|
|
(9,786
|
)
|
|
|
(1,097
|
)
|
|
|
(617
|
)
|
|
|
16,724
|
|
|
|
(18,919
|
)
|
|
|
(16,882
|
)
|
|
|
(10,608
|
)
|
|
|
(983
|
)
|
|
|
(310
|
)
|
|
|
11,781
|
|
|
|
(17,002
|
)
|
Research and development
|
|
|
(192
|
)
|
|
|
(253
|
)
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
(479
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(981
|
)
|
|
|
(338
|
)
|
|
|
(380
|
)
|
|
|
(101
|
)
|
|
|
(266
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,085
|
)
|
|
|
(175
|
)
|
|
|
(329
|
)
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
(190
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(733
|
)
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
(1,144
|
)
|
|
|
(1,385
|
)
|
|
|
(126
|
)
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2,722
|
)
|
|
|
(1,021
|
)
|
|
|
(1,623
|
)
|
|
|
(128
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2,807
|
)
|
|
|
(917
|
)
|
|
|
(1,149
|
)
|
|
|
(103
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2,186
|
)
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(950
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(950
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
6,725
|
|
|
|
(266
|
)
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
(511
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
6,057
|
|
|
|
12,209
|
|
|
|
2,270
|
|
|
|
365
|
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
14,748
|
|
|
|
7,017
|
|
|
|
5,996
|
|
|
|
455
|
|
|
|
(274
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
13,194
|
|
Financial income
|
|
|
2,439
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
711
|
|
|
|
(2,789
|
)
|
|
|
381
|
|
|
|
3,048
|
|
|
|
798
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(3,255
|
)
|
|
|
602
|
|
|
|
2,514
|
|
|
|
595
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
(2,848
|
)
|
|
|
295
|
|
Financial expenses
|
|
|
(2,941
|
)
|
|
|
(653
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(736
|
)
|
|
|
2,789
|
|
|
|
(1,558
|
)
|
|
|
(3,479
|
)
|
|
|
(1,490
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
3,255
|
|
|
|
(1,765
|
)
|
|
|
(4,008
|
)
|
|
|
(1,318
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
2,848
|
|
|
|
(2,509
|
)
|
Gains (losses) on derivatives, net
|
|
|
1,647
|
|
|
|
(119
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,528
|
|
|
|
(719
|
)
|
|
|
(93
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(812
|
)
|
|
|
854
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
917
|
|
Foreign exchange and monetary gains (losses), net
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
445
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
675
|
|
|
|
767
|
|
|
|
(265
|
)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(106
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
364
|
|
|
|
2,302
|
|
|
|
274
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,559
|
|
Gain on sale of investments
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
(108
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
237
|
|
|
|
459
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
777
|
|
change in provision for losses on equity investments
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
433
|
|
|
|
543
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
794
|
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
595
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(2,618
|
)
|
|
|
525
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2,100
|
)
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
(697
|
)
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(535
|
)
|
|
|
(1,959
|
)
|
|
|
(1,236
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(3,201
|
)
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
(121
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(107
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(256
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(258
|
)
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
(770
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(802
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to the Companys stockholders
|
|
|
5,799
|
|
|
|
(295
|
)
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
(375
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5,349
|
|
|
|
12,491
|
|
|
|
371
|
|
|
|
484
|
|
|
|
(128
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
13,218
|
|
|
|
6,990
|
|
|
|
3,778
|
|
|
|
777
|
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
11,825
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales classified by geographic destination:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign market
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
America, except United States
|
|
|
419
|
|
|
|
1,368
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
(596
|
)
|
|
|
1,252
|
|
|
|
1,805
|
|
|
|
2,215
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,201
|
)
|
|
|
2,820
|
|
|
|
1,449
|
|
|
|
2,405
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,026
|
)
|
|
|
2,851
|
|
United States
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
824
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
|
832
|
|
|
|
648
|
|
|
|
2,201
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
(392
|
)
|
|
|
2,467
|
|
|
|
432
|
|
|
|
2,770
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
(318
|
)
|
|
|
2,965
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
6,101
|
|
|
|
2,618
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
(4,726
|
)
|
|
|
4,036
|
|
|
|
11,215
|
|
|
|
4,132
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
(5,933
|
)
|
|
|
9,449
|
|
|
|
6,823
|
|
|
|
4,195
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(3,716
|
)
|
|
|
7,335
|
|
Middle East/Africa/Oceania
|
|
|
972
|
|
|
|
233
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
(707
|
)
|
|
|
531
|
|
|
|
1,904
|
|
|
|
394
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
(952
|
)
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
827
|
|
|
|
538
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
(412
|
)
|
|
|
1,114
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
2,356
|
|
|
|
972
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
(1,116
|
)
|
|
|
2,412
|
|
|
|
4,516
|
|
|
|
1,893
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
(1,918
|
)
|
|
|
4,737
|
|
|
|
2,131
|
|
|
|
2,625
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(929
|
)
|
|
|
3,827
|
|
China
|
|
|
12,019
|
|
|
|
878
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
(4,022
|
)
|
|
|
9,003
|
|
|
|
9,743
|
|
|
|
887
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(3,949
|
)
|
|
|
6,706
|
|
|
|
7,570
|
|
|
|
1,457
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(3,168
|
)
|
|
|
5,863
|
|
Asia, other than Japan and China
|
|
|
1,760
|
|
|
|
1,258
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
(923
|
)
|
|
|
2,218
|
|
|
|
3,538
|
|
|
|
1,946
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
(1,497
|
)
|
|
|
4,155
|
|
|
|
1,894
|
|
|
|
2,854
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(868
|
)
|
|
|
3,881
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,656
|
|
|
|
8,151
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
562
|
|
|
|
(12,152
|
)
|
|
|
20,284
|
|
|
|
33,369
|
|
|
|
13,668
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
588
|
|
|
|
(15,842
|
)
|
|
|
31,834
|
|
|
|
21,126
|
|
|
|
16,844
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
242
|
|
|
|
(10,437
|
)
|
|
|
27,836
|
|
Domestic market
|
|
|
1,779
|
|
|
|
1,148
|
|
|
|
1,101
|
|
|
|
389
|
|
|
|
(762
|
)
|
|
|
3,655
|
|
|
|
4,342
|
|
|
|
1,341
|
|
|
|
1,640
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
(882
|
)
|
|
|
6,675
|
|
|
|
3,865
|
|
|
|
1,238
|
|
|
|
1,519
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(1,344
|
)
|
|
|
5,279
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,435
|
|
|
|
9,299
|
|
|
|
1,168
|
|
|
|
951
|
|
|
|
(12,914
|
)
|
|
|
23,939
|
|
|
|
37,711
|
|
|
|
15,009
|
|
|
|
1,691
|
|
|
|
822
|
|
|
|
(16,724
|
)
|
|
|
38,509
|
|
|
|
24,991
|
|
|
|
18,082
|
|
|
|
1,580
|
|
|
|
243
|
|
|
|
(11,781
|
)
|
|
|
33,115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-42
Operating segment after eliminations
(disaggregated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property,
|
|
|
Addition to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
plant and
|
|
|
property,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation,
|
|
|
|
|
|
equipment,
|
|
|
plant and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
depletion
|
|
|
|
|
|
net and
|
|
|
equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value added
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Cost and
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
Operation
|
|
|
intangible
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
tax
|
|
|
revenues
|
|
|
expenses
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
amortization
|
|
|
income
|
|
|
assets
|
|
|
intangible
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
Ferrous
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iron ore
|
|
|
11,797
|
|
|
|
1,034
|
|
|
|
12,831
|
|
|
|
(172
|
)
|
|
|
12,659
|
|
|
|
(4,957
|
)
|
|
|
7,702
|
|
|
|
(1,043
|
)
|
|
|
6,659
|
|
|
|
21,736
|
|
|
|
3,361
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
Pellets
|
|
|
1,015
|
|
|
|
337
|
|
|
|
1,352
|
|
|
|
(92
|
)
|
|
|
1,260
|
|
|
|
(1,165
|
)
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
947
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
1,037
|
|
Manganese
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
(103
|
)
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Ferroalloys
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
372
|
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
327
|
|
|
|
(278
|
)
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
261
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Pig iron
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,165
|
|
|
|
1,580
|
|
|
|
14,745
|
|
|
|
(311
|
)
|
|
|
14,434
|
|
|
|
(6,566
|
)
|
|
|
7,868
|
|
|
|
(1,143
|
)
|
|
|
6,725
|
|
|
|
23,113
|
|
|
|
3,609
|
|
|
|
1,111
|
|
Non ferrous
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nickel and other products (*)
|
|
|
3,937
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
3,947
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,947
|
|
|
|
(3,292
|
)
|
|
|
655
|
|
|
|
(1,016
|
)
|
|
|
(361
|
)
|
|
|
24,206
|
|
|
|
1,464
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
Potash
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
413
|
|
|
|
413
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
396
|
|
|
|
(187
|
)
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Kaolin
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
(146
|
)
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Copper concentrate
|
|
|
597
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
682
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
663
|
|
|
|
(462
|
)
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
4,127
|
|
|
|
558
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Aluminum products
|
|
|
1,869
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
2,050
|
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
2,013
|
|
|
|
(1,969
|
)
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
(235
|
)
|
|
|
(191
|
)
|
|
|
4,663
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,541
|
|
|
|
724
|
|
|
|
7,265
|
|
|
|
(82
|
)
|
|
|
7,183
|
|
|
|
(6,056
|
)
|
|
|
1,127
|
|
|
|
(1,386
|
)
|
|
|
(259
|
)
|
|
|
33,345
|
|
|
|
2,218
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
Logistics
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Railroads
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
838
|
|
|
|
838
|
|
|
|
(137
|
)
|
|
|
701
|
|
|
|
(539
|
)
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
1,979
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
468
|
|
Ports
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
264
|
|
|
|
264
|
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
(161
|
)
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
1,441
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Ships
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
1,104
|
|
|
|
738
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1,102
|
|
|
|
1,104
|
|
|
|
(175
|
)
|
|
|
929
|
|
|
|
(709
|
)
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
(126
|
)
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
4,524
|
|
|
|
940
|
|
|
|
593
|
|
Others
|
|
|
576
|
|
|
|
249
|
|
|
|
825
|
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
|
|
765
|
|
|
|
(1,201
|
)
|
|
|
(436
|
)
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
|
|
(503
|
)
|
|
|
7,828
|
|
|
|
1,329
|
|
|
|
2,708
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,284
|
|
|
|
3,655
|
|
|
|
23,939
|
|
|
|
(628
|
)
|
|
|
23,311
|
|
|
|
(14,532
|
)
|
|
|
8,779
|
|
|
|
(2,722
|
)
|
|
|
6,057
|
|
|
|
68,810
|
|
|
|
8,096
|
|
|
|
4,585
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) Includes nickel co-products and by-products (copper,
precious metals, cobalt and others).
F-43
Operating segment after eliminations
(disaggregated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property,
|
|
|
Addition to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
plant and
|
|
|
property,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
equipment,
|
|
|
plant and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
net and
|
|
|
equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value added
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Cost and
|
|
|
|
|
|
depletion and
|
|
|
Impairment
|
|
|
Operation
|
|
|
intangible
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
tax
|
|
|
revenues
|
|
|
expenses
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
amortization
|
|
|
of goodwill
|
|
|
income
|
|
|
assets
|
|
|
intangible
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
Ferrous
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iron ore
|
|
|
15,102
|
|
|
|
2,673
|
|
|
|
17,775
|
|
|
|
(364
|
)
|
|
|
17,411
|
|
|
|
(6,547
|
)
|
|
|
10,864
|
|
|
|
(876
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
9,988
|
|
|
|
14,595
|
|
|
|
3,645
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
Pellets
|
|
|
3,481
|
|
|
|
820
|
|
|
|
4,301
|
|
|
|
(189
|
)
|
|
|
4,112
|
|
|
|
(2,394
|
)
|
|
|
1,718
|
|
|
|
(112
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,606
|
|
|
|
645
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
708
|
|
Manganese
|
|
|
221
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Ferroalloys
|
|
|
704
|
|
|
|
507
|
|
|
|
1,211
|
|
|
|
(128
|
)
|
|
|
1,083
|
|
|
|
(457
|
)
|
|
|
626
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
604
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Pig iron
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,654
|
|
|
|
4,045
|
|
|
|
23,699
|
|
|
|
(696
|
)
|
|
|
23,003
|
|
|
|
(9,542
|
)
|
|
|
13,461
|
|
|
|
(1,018
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
12,443
|
|
|
|
15,568
|
|
|
|
3,929
|
|
|
|
755
|
|
Non ferrous
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nickel and other products (*)
|
|
|
7,785
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
7,829
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
7,829
|
|
|
|
(4,425
|
)
|
|
|
3,404
|
|
|
|
(1,323
|
)
|
|
|
(950
|
)
|
|
|
1,131
|
|
|
|
21,729
|
|
|
|
2,813
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
Potash
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
(120
|
)
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Kaolin
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
(213
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Copper concentrate
|
|
|
787
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
893
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
871
|
|
|
|
(683
|
)
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
3,543
|
|
|
|
283
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Aluminum products
|
|
|
2,681
|
|
|
|
361
|
|
|
|
3,042
|
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
2,976
|
|
|
|
(2,288
|
)
|
|
|
688
|
|
|
|
(172
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
516
|
|
|
|
3,831
|
|
|
|
440
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,420
|
|
|
|
848
|
|
|
|
12,268
|
|
|
|
(113
|
)
|
|
|
12,155
|
|
|
|
(7,729
|
)
|
|
|
4,426
|
|
|
|
(1,623
|
)
|
|
|
(950
|
)
|
|
|
1,853
|
|
|
|
29,461
|
|
|
|
3,585
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
Logistics
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Railroads
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,303
|
|
|
|
1,303
|
|
|
|
(205
|
)
|
|
|
1,098
|
|
|
|
(749
|
)
|
|
|
349
|
|
|
|
(103
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
1,431
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
326
|
|
Ports
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
304
|
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
|
(198
|
)
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
1,441
|
|
|
|
242
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Ships
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
374
|
|
|
|
343
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
1,596
|
|
|
|
1,607
|
|
|
|
(244
|
)
|
|
|
1,363
|
|
|
|
(947
|
)
|
|
|
416
|
|
|
|
(129
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
|
3,246
|
|
|
|
706
|
|
|
|
420
|
|
Others
|
|
|
749
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
935
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
905
|
|
|
|
(703
|
)
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
1,054
|
|
|
|
752
|
|
|
|
1,040
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,834
|
|
|
|
6,675
|
|
|
|
38,509
|
|
|
|
(1,083
|
)
|
|
|
37,426
|
|
|
|
(18,921
|
)
|
|
|
18,505
|
|
|
|
(2,807
|
)
|
|
|
(950
|
)
|
|
|
14,748
|
|
|
|
49,329
|
|
|
|
8,972
|
|
|
|
2,408
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) Includes nickel co-products and by-products (copper,
precious metals, cobalt and others).
F-44
Operating segment after eliminations
(disaggregated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property,
|
|
|
Addition to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
plant and
|
|
|
property,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
equipment,
|
|
|
plant and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation,
|
|
|
|
|
|
net and
|
|
|
equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost and
|
|
|
|
|
|
depletion and
|
|
|
Operation
|
|
|
intangible
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
added tax
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
|
expenses
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
amortization
|
|
|
income
|
|
|
assets
|
|
|
intangible
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
Ferrous
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iron ore
|
|
|
9,873
|
|
|
|
2,035
|
|
|
|
11,908
|
|
|
|
(286
|
)
|
|
|
11,622
|
|
|
|
(4,520
|
)
|
|
|
7,102
|
|
|
|
(777
|
)
|
|
|
6,325
|
|
|
|
17,031
|
|
|
|
2,496
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
Pellets
|
|
|
2,151
|
|
|
|
587
|
|
|
|
2,738
|
|
|
|
(132
|
)
|
|
|
2,606
|
|
|
|
(1,860
|
)
|
|
|
746
|
|
|
|
(87
|
)
|
|
|
659
|
|
|
|
754
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
741
|
|
Manganese
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Ferroalloys
|
|
|
445
|
|
|
|
274
|
|
|
|
719
|
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
|
|
649
|
|
|
|
(442
|
)
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Pig iron
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,598
|
|
|
|
2,917
|
|
|
|
15,515
|
|
|
|
(493
|
)
|
|
|
15,022
|
|
|
|
(6,945
|
)
|
|
|
8,077
|
|
|
|
(901
|
)
|
|
|
7,176
|
|
|
|
18,230
|
|
|
|
2,646
|
|
|
|
801
|
|
Non ferrous
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nickel and other products (*)
|
|
|
11,664
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
11,789
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
11,789
|
|
|
|
(6,077
|
)
|
|
|
5,712
|
|
|
|
(927
|
)
|
|
|
4,785
|
|
|
|
23,668
|
|
|
|
2,088
|
|
|
|
299
|
|
Potash
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
(108
|
)
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Kaolin
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
(228
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Copper concentrate
|
|
|
663
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
802
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
772
|
|
|
|
(456
|
)
|
|
|
316
|
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
1,841
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Aluminum products
|
|
|
2,418
|
|
|
|
304
|
|
|
|
2,722
|
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
2,656
|
|
|
|
(1,717
|
)
|
|
|
939
|
|
|
|
(111
|
)
|
|
|
828
|
|
|
|
4,448
|
|
|
|
856
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,947
|
|
|
|
782
|
|
|
|
15,729
|
|
|
|
(115
|
)
|
|
|
15,614
|
|
|
|
(8,586
|
)
|
|
|
7,028
|
|
|
|
(1,158
|
)
|
|
|
5,870
|
|
|
|
30,470
|
|
|
|
3,193
|
|
|
|
483
|
|
Logistics
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Railroads
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,220
|
|
|
|
1,220
|
|
|
|
(199
|
)
|
|
|
1,021
|
|
|
|
(636
|
)
|
|
|
385
|
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
|
|
297
|
|
|
|
1,735
|
|
|
|
491
|
|
|
|
342
|
|
Ports
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
254
|
|
|
|
267
|
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
221
|
|
|
|
(177
|
)
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
1,371
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Ships
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
1,495
|
|
|
|
1,525
|
|
|
|
(248
|
)
|
|
|
1,277
|
|
|
|
(857
|
)
|
|
|
420
|
|
|
|
(113
|
)
|
|
|
307
|
|
|
|
3,142
|
|
|
|
605
|
|
|
|
449
|
|
Others
|
|
|
261
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
|
(474
|
)
|
|
|
(145
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(159
|
)
|
|
|
2,783
|
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
|
1,189
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,836
|
|
|
|
5,279
|
|
|
|
33,115
|
|
|
|
(873
|
)
|
|
|
32,242
|
|
|
|
(16,862
|
)
|
|
|
15,380
|
|
|
|
(2,186
|
)
|
|
|
13,194
|
|
|
|
54,625
|
|
|
|
6,651
|
|
|
|
2,922
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) Includes nickel co-products and by-products (copper,
precious metals, cobalt and others).
F-45
|
|
24
|
Related party
transactions
|
Balances from transactions with major related parties are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
AFFILIATED COMPANIES AND JOINT VENTURES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Companhia Hispano-Brasileira de
Pelotização HISPANOBRÁS
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
Companhia Ítalo-Brasileira de
Pelotização ITABRASCO
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
Companhia Nipo-Brasileira de Pelotização
NIBRASCO
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
Companhia Coreano-Brasileira de
Pelotização KOBRASCO
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Baovale Mineração SA
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Usinas Siderúrgicas de Minas Gerais SA
USIMINAS(*)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Minas da Serra Geral SA MSG
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
MRS Logística SA
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
418
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
219
|
|
Mineração Rio Norte SA
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
Samarco Mineração SA
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Teal Minerals Incorporated
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Korea Nickel Corporation
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Mitsui & CO, LTD
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Others
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
222
|
|
|
|
613
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
505
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
496
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
414
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) Sold in April 2009
These balances are included in the following balance sheet
classifications:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Loans and advances to related parties
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Non-current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and advances to related parties
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suppliers
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
463
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
302
|
|
Loans from related parties
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
Non-current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
222
|
|
|
|
613
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
505
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income and expenses from the principal transactions and
financial operations carried out with major related parties are
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
AFFILIATED COMPANIES AND JOINT VENTURES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Companhia Nipo-Brasileira de Pelotização
NIBRASCO
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
393
|
|
|
|
386
|
|
|
|
328
|
|
Samarco Mineração SA
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
259
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Companhia Ítalo-Brasileira de
Pelotização ITABRASCO
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
233
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
Companhia Hispano-Brasileira de
Pelotização HISPANOBRÁS
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
342
|
|
|
|
378
|
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
Companhia Coreano-Brasileira de
Pelotização KOBRASCO
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
270
|
|
Usinas Siderúrgicas de Minas Gerais SA
USIMINAS(*)
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
651
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
442
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Mineração Rio Norte SA
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
249
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
232
|
|
MRS Logística SA
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
484
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
829
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
593
|
|
Others
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
892
|
|
|
|
1,741
|
|
|
|
2,280
|
|
|
|
1,692
|
|
|
|
1,810
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) Sold in April 2009.
F-46
These amounts are included in the following statement of income
line items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
Sales / Cost of iron ore and pellets
|
|
|
233
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
1,698
|
|
|
|
1,369
|
|
|
|
1,649
|
|
|
|
960
|
|
Revenues / expense from logistic services
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
457
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
624
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
593
|
|
Sales / Cost of aluminum products
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
249
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
232
|
|
Financial income/expenses
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
Others
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
892
|
|
|
|
1,741
|
|
|
|
2,280
|
|
|
|
1,692
|
|
|
|
1,810
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additionally we have loans payable to Banco Nacional de
Desenvolvimento Social and BNDES Participações S.A in
the amounts of US$1,691 and US$662 respectively, accruing
interest at market rates, which fall due through 2029. The
operations generated interest expenses of US$94. We also
maintained cash equivalent balances with Banco Bradesco S.A. in
the amount of US$53 as of December 31, 2009. The effect of
these operations in results was US$39.
|
|
25
|
Derivative
financial instruments
|
Risk management
policy
Vales risk management strategy encompasses an enterprise
risk management approach where we evaluate not only market risk
impacts on the business, but also the impacts arising from
credit and operating risks.
An enterprise wide risk management approach is considered by us
to be mandatory for Vale as traditional market risk measures,
such as VaR (Value at Risk), are not sufficient to evaluate the
group exposures since our main goal is to avoid a possible lack
of cash to fulfill our future obligations and needs.
We also consider the correlations between different market risk
factors when evaluating our exposures. By doing so, we are able
to evaluate the net impact on our cash flows from all main
market variables. Using this framework we also identified a
natural diversification of products and currencies in our
portfolio. This diversification benefit implies in a natural
reduction of the overall risk of the Company. Additionally, we
are constantly working to implement risk mitigation strategies
that significantly contribute to reduce the volatility in our
cash flows beyond the levels initially observed and to
acceptable levels of risk.
Vale considers that the effective management of risk is a key
objective to support its growth strategy and financial
flexibility. The risk reduction on Vales future cash flows
contributes to a better perception of the Companys credit
quality, improving its ability to access different markets. As a
commitment to the risk management strategy, the Board of
Directors has established an enterprise-wide risk management
policy and a risk management committee.
The risk management policy determines that Vale should evaluate
regularly its cash flow risks and potential risk mitigation
strategies. Whenever considered necessary, mitigation strategies
should be put in place to reduce cash flow volatility. The
executive board is responsible for the evaluation and approval
of long-term risk mitigation strategies recommended by the risk
management committee.
The risk management committee assists our executive officers in
overseeing and reviewing our enterprise risk management
activities including the principles, policies, process,
procedures and instruments employed to manage risk. The risk
management committee reports periodically to the executive board
on how risks have been monitored, what are the most important
risks we are exposed to and their impact on cash flows.
The risk management policy and the risk management procedures,
that complement the normative of risk management governance
model, explicitly prohibit speculative transactions with
derivatives and require the diversification of operations and
counterparties.
Besides the risk management governance model, Vale has put in
place a well defined corporate governance structure. The
recommendation and execution of the derivative transactions are
implemented by different and independent areas. It is the
responsibility of the risk management department to define and
propose to the risk management committee market risk mitigation
strategies consistent with Vales and its wholly owned
subsidiaries corporate strategy. It is the responsibility of the
finance department the execution of the risk mitigation
strategies
F-47
through the use of derivatives. The independence of the areas
guarantees an effective control on these operations.
The consolidated market risk exposure and the portfolio of
derivatives are measured monthly and monitored in order to
evaluate the financial results and market risk impacts on our
cash flow, as well as to guarantee that the initial goals will
be achieved. The mark-to-market of the derivatives portfolio is
reported weekly to management.
Considering the nature of Vales business and operations,
the main market risk factors which the Company is exposed are:
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rates;
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange; and
|
|
|
|
Product prices and input costs
|
Foreign exchange
and interest rate risk
Vales cash flows are exposed to volatility of several
different currencies. While most of our product prices are
indexed to the US dollars, most of our costs, disbursements and
investments are indexed to currencies other than the US dollar,
mainly the Brazilian Real and Canadian dollar.
Derivative instruments may be used to reduce Vales
potential cash flow volatility arising from the currency
mismatch between our debt and our revenues. Vales foreign
exchange and interest rate derivative portfolio consists,
basically, of interest rate swaps to convert floating cash flows
in Brazilian Reais to fixed or floating US dollar cash flows,
without any leverage.
Vale is also exposed to interest rate risks on loans and
financings. Our floating rate debt consists mainly of loans
including export pre-payments, commercial banks and multilateral
organizations loans. In general, our US dollar floating rate
debt is subject to changes in the LIBOR (London Interbank Offer
Rate in US dollars). To mitigate the impact of the interest rate
volatility on its cash flows, Vale takes advantage of natural
hedges resulting from the correlation of metal prices and US
dollar floating rates. When natural hedges are not present, we
may opt to look for the same effect by using financial
instruments.
Our Brazilian Real denominated debt subject to floating interest
rates are debentures, loans obtained from Banco Nacional de
Desenvolvimento Econômico e Social (BNDES) and property and
services acquisition financing in the Brazilian market. These
debts are mainly linked to CDI and TJLP.
The swap transactions have similar settlement dates to the debt
interest and principal payment dates, taking into account the
liquidity restrictions of the market. At each settlement date,
the results on the swap transactions partially offset the impact
of the US dollar / Brazilian Real exchange rate in our
obligations, contributing to a stable flow of cash disbursements
in US dollars for interest
and/or
principal payment of our Brazilian Real denominated debt.
In the event of an appreciation (depreciation) of the Brazilian
Real against the US dollar, the negative (positive) impact on
our Brazilian Real denominated debt obligations (interest
and/or
principal payment) measured in US dollars will be partially
offset by a positive (negative) effect from any existing swap
transaction, regardless of the US dollar / Brazilian
Real exchange rate on the payment date.
We have other exposures associated with our outstanding debt
portfolio. In order to reduce cash flow volatility associated
with a financing from KFW (Kreditanstalt Für Wiederaufbau)
indexed to Euribor, Vale entered into a swap contract where cash
flows in Euros are converted into cash flows in US dollars.
In order to reduce the cash flows volatility associated with the
foreign exchange exposure from coal fixed price sales, Vale
purchased forward Australian dollars.
Product price
risk
Vale is also exposed to several market risks associated with
global commodities price volatilities.
Currently, our derivative transactions include nickel, aluminum,
bunker oil and maritime freight (FFA) derivatives and all have
the same purpose of mitigating Vales cash flow volatility.
F-48
Nickel The Company has the following
derivative instruments in this category:
|
|
|
|
|
Strategic derivative program in order to protect our
cash flows in 2009 and 2010, we entered into derivative
transactions where we fixed the prices of some of our nickel
sales during the period.
|
|
|
|
Fixed price sales program we use to enter into
nickel future contracts on the London Metal Exchange (LME) with
the purpose of maintaining our exposure to nickel price
variation, regarding the fact that, in some cases, the commodity
is sold at a fixed price to some customers. This program was
interrupted after the decision of the strategic derivative
program.
|
|
|
|
Nickel purchase program Vale has also sold nickel
futures on the LME, in order to minimize the risk of mismatch
between the pricing on the costs of intermediate products and
finished goods.
|
Aluminum in order to protect our cash flow in
2009 and 2010, we entered into derivatives transactions where we
fixed the prices of some of our aluminum sales during the period.
Bunker Oil In order to reduce the impact of
bunker oil price fluctuation on Vales freight hiring and
consequently on Vales cash flow, Vale implemented a
derivative program that consists of forward purchases and swaps.
Maritime Freight In order to reduce the
impact of freight price fluctuations on the Companys cash
flows, Vale implemented a derivative program that consists of
purchasing Forward Freight Agreements (FFA).
Embedded derivatives In addition to the
contracts mentioned above, Vale Inco Ltd., Vales
wholly-owned subsidiary, has nickel concentrate and raw
materials purchase agreements, where there are provisions based
on the movement of nickel and copper prices. These provisions
are considered embedded derivatives. There is also an embedded
derivative related to energy purchase in our subsidiary Albras
on which there is a premium that can be charged based on the
movement of aluminum prices.
Under the standard Accounting for Derivative Financial
Instruments and Hedging Activities, all derivatives, whether
designated in hedging relationships or not, are required to be
recorded in the balance sheet at fair value and the gain or loss
in fair value is included in current earnings, unless if
qualified as hedge accounting. A derivative must be designated
in a hedging relationship in order to qualify for hedge
accounting. These requirements include a determination of what
portions of hedges are deemed to be effective versus
ineffective. In general, a hedging relationship is effective
when a change in the fair value of the derivative is offset by
an equal and opposite change in the fair value of the underlying
hedged item. In accordance with these requirements,
effectiveness tests are performed in order to assess
effectiveness and quantify ineffectiveness for all designated
hedges.
At December 31, 2009, we had outstanding cash flow hedges.
A cash flow hedge is a hedge of the exposure to variability in
expected future cash flows that is attributable to a particular
risk such as a forecasted purchase or sale. If a derivative is
designated as a cash flow hedge, the effective portions of the
changes in the fair value of the derivative are recorded in
other comprehensive income and are recognized in earnings when
the hedged item affects earnings. Ineffective portions of
changes in the fair value of the derivatives designated as
hedges are recognized in earnings. If a portion of a derivative
contract is excluded for purposes of effectiveness testing, such
as time value, the value of such excluded portion is included in
earnings.
F-49
The assets and liabilities balances of derivatives measured at
fair value and the effects of their recognition are shown in the
following tables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
As of December 31
|
|
|
As of December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Short-term
|
|
|
Long-term
|
|
|
Short-term
|
|
|
Long-term
|
|
|
Short-term
|
|
|
Long-term
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange and interest rate risk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CDI & TJLP vs. floating & fixed swap
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
794
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(561
|
)
|
USD floating rate vs. fixed USD rate swap
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
EURO floating rate vs. USD floating rate swap
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
AUD floating rate vs. fixed USD rate swap
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
804
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(575
|
)
|
Commodities price risk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nickel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed price program
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
Purchase program
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Strategic program
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Aluminium
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Bunker Oil Hedge
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Maritime Freight Hiring Protection Program
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
Embedded derivatives:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For nickel fixed price sale
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Customer raw material contracts
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Natural gas hedge
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Derivatives designated as hedge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange cash flow hedge
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Aluminium
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
865
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
(129
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(634
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-50
The following table presents the
effects of derivatives for the years ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of gain or (loss) recognized in financial income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(expense)
|
|
|
Financial settlement
|
|
|
Amount of gain or (loss) recognized in OCI
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange and interest rate risk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Swap BRL denominated Brazilian payroll into USD
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(198
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CDI & TJLP vs. USD fixed and floating rate swap
|
|
|
1,598
|
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
934
|
|
|
|
(243
|
)
|
|
|
(199
|
)
|
|
|
(293
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EURO floating rate vs. USD floating rate swap
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(684
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USD floating rate vs. USD fixed rate swap
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AUD floating rate vs. fixed USD rate swap
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,610
|
|
|
|
(629
|
)
|
|
|
934
|
|
|
|
(241
|
)
|
|
|
(396
|
)
|
|
|
(293
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodities price risk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nickel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed price program
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
(102
|
)
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase program
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Strategic program
|
|
|
(95
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased scrap protection program
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Strategic hedging program
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(129
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Platinum
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gold
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(68
|
)
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maritime Freight Hiring Protection Program
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bunker Oil Hedge
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
(229
|
)
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
410
|
|
|
|
363
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Embedded derivatives:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For nickel concentrate costumer sales
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer raw material contracts
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy - Aluminum options
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(101
|
)
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives designated as hedge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum hedge
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bunker Oil Hedge
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange cash flow hedge
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,528
|
|
|
|
(812
|
)
|
|
|
931
|
|
|
|
(146
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-51
Unrealized gains (losses) in the period are included in our
income statement under the caption of gains (losses) on
derivatives, net.
Final maturity dates for the above instruments are as follows:
|
|
|
Interest rates / Currencies
|
|
December 2019
|
Bunker Oil
|
|
December 2010
|
Freight
|
|
December 2010
|
Nickel
|
|
May 2011
|
Aluminum
|
|
December 2010
|
In January, we entered into an agreement, to sell the aluminum
assets of our wholly-owned subsidiary Valesul Alumínio S.A,
located in the State of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, to Alumínio
Nordeste S.A., a company of the Metalis group, for US$31.
In January we redeemed all outstanding export receivables
securitization notes issued in September 2000 and July 2003. The
outstanding principal amounts were US$28 for the September 2000,
at an interest rate of 8.926% per annum notes due in 2010 and
US$122 for the July 2003, at an interest rate of 4.43% per annum
notes due in 2013. Redeemed debt amounts totaled US$150.
In January we entered into a purchase agreement with Bunge
Fertilizantes S.A. and Bunge Brasil Holdings B.V. to acquire
100% of the outstanding shares of Bunge Participações
e Investimentos S.A. (BPI), the Company which has assets in
Brazil and investments in Fertifos Administração e
Participações S.A. (Fertifos), which holds 42.3% of
Fertilizantes Fosfatados S.A. Fosfertil (Fosfertil),
for US$3,800, in all cash-transaction. The acquisition is still
subject to conditions precedent such as approvals from
governmental regulatory agencies. Also, as part of this
acquisition we entered into option contracts to buy the
additional shares of Fertifos Administração e
Participações S.A. (Fertifos) with Fertilizantes
Heringer S.A. Heringer (strike price US$2) ,
Fertilizantes do Paraná Ltda. Fertipar (strike
price US$40) and Yara Brasil Fertilizantes S.A. (strike price
US$785). These contracts give us the right to acquire 16.3% of
Fosfertil shares and are subject to certain conditions, among
them, the effective acquisition of the fertilizer assets of
Bunge Group in Brazil. Control over these businesses have not
been obtained when these financial statements were approved to
be issued.
F-52