Form 20-F
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 20-F
|
|
|
o |
|
Registration statement pursuant to Section 12(b) or 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
or
|
|
|
þ |
|
Annual report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010
or
|
|
|
o |
|
Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
or
|
|
|
o |
|
Shell company report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
Commission file number: 001-32734
TERNIUM S.A.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
N/A
(Translation of registrants name into English)
Grand Duchy of Luxembourg
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
29, Avenue de la Porte-Neuve 3rd floor
L-2227 Luxembourg
(Address of registrants registered office)
Alicia Alvarez
29, Avenue de la Porte-Neuve 3rd floor
L-2227 Luxembourg
Tel. +352 26 68 31 52, Fax. +352 26 68 31 53, e-mail: luxembourg@ternium.com
(Name, Telephone, E-Mail and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
Name of Each Exchange On Which Registered |
|
|
|
American Depositary Shares
|
|
New York Stock Exchange |
Ordinary Shares, par value USD1.00 per share
|
|
New York Stock Exchange* |
* |
|
Ordinary shares of Ternium S.A. are not listed for trading
but only in connection with the registration of American
Depositary Shares which are evidenced by American Depositary
Receipts. |
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act:
None
Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuers classes of capital or common
stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report.
2,004,743,442 ordinary shares, par value USD1.00 per share
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule
405 of the Securities Act.
Yes þ No o
If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is
not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934.
Yes o No þ
Notechecking the box above will not relieve any registrant required to file reports pursuant
to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 from their obligations under
those Sections.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such
files).
Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated
filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated Filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o |
Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the
financial statements included in this filing:
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. GAAP o
|
|
International Financial Reporting Standards as issued
by the International Accounting Standards Board þ
|
|
Other o |
If Other has been checked in response to the previous question indicate by check mark which
financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow
Item 17 o Item 18 o
If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
Please send copies of notices and communications from the Securities and Exchange Commission to:
|
|
|
Cristian J.P. Mitrani
Mitrani, Caballero, Rosso Alba, Francia,
Ojam & Ruiz Moreno Abogados
Alicia Moreau de Justo 400, 3rd Floor
C1007AAH Buenos Aires, Argentina
(54-11) 4590-8600
|
|
Robert S. Risoleo, Esq.
Sullivan & Cromwell LLP
1701 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20006
(202) 956-7500 |
CERTAIN DEFINED TERMS
In this annual report, unless otherwise specified or if the context so
requires: |
|
|
References to the Company refer exclusively to Ternium S.A., a Luxembourg public
limited liability company (société anonyme); |
|
|
References in this annual report to Ternium, we, us or our refer to
Ternium S.A. and its consolidated subsidiaries; |
|
|
References to the Ternium companies are to the Companys manufacturing
subsidiaries, namely Ternium México, S.A. de C.V., a Mexican corporation (Ternium
Mexico), Siderar S.A.I.C., an Argentine corporation (Siderar), and Ferrasa S.A.S., a
Colombian corporation (Ferrasa), and their respective subsidiaries; |
|
|
References to Tenaris are to Tenaris S.A., a Luxembourg public limited liability
company (société anonyme) and a significant shareholder of the Company; |
|
|
References to San Faustin are to San Faustin S.A., a Luxembourg corporation and
the Companys indirect controlling shareholder; |
|
|
References to the Ternium network or Ternium Internacional are to an
international group of companies wholly owned by Ternium that market and provide
worldwide distribution services for products offered primarily by Ternium; |
|
|
References to ADSs are to the American Depositary Shares, which are evidenced by
American Depositary Receipts; |
|
|
References to tons are to metric tons; one metric ton is equal to 1,000
kilograms, 2,204.62 pounds or 1.102 U.S. (short) tons; and |
|
|
References to billions are to thousands of millions, or 1,000,000,000. |
2
PRESENTATION OF CERTAIN FINANCIAL AND OTHER INFORMATION
Accounting Principles
We prepare our consolidated financial statements in conformity with International Financial
Reporting Standards and IFRIC interpretations as issued by the International Accounting Standards
Board, or IASB and adopted by the European Union (EU), or IFRS. IFRS differ in certain significant
respects from generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, commonly referred to
as U.S. GAAP.
3
Currencies
In this annual report, unless otherwise specified or the context otherwise requires:
|
|
dollars, U.S. dollars, USD or US$ each refers to the United States of America
dollar; |
|
|
Mexican pesos or MXN each refers to the Mexican peso; and |
|
|
Argentine pesos or ARP each refers to the Argentine peso. |
On December 31, 2010, the noon buying rate between the Mexican peso and the U.S. dollar (as
published by Banco de México, or the Mexican Bank) was MXN12.3496=USD1.0000, and the U.S. dollar
sell exchange rate in the Argentine Republic (as published by Banco Central de la República
Argentina, or the Argentine Central Bank) was ARP3.9760=USD1.0000. Those rates may differ from the
actual rates used in preparation of the Companys consolidated financial statements. We do not
represent that any of these currencies could have been or could be converted into U.S. dollars or
that U.S. dollars could have been or could be converted into any of these currencies.
Rounding; Comparability of Data
Certain monetary amounts, percentages and other figures included in this annual report have been
subject to rounding adjustments. Accordingly, figures shown as totals in certain tables may not be
the arithmetic aggregation of the figures that precede them, and figures expressed as percentages
in the text may not total 100% or, as applicable, when aggregated may not be the arithmetic
aggregation of the percentages that precede them.
Our Internet Site is Not Part of this Annual Report
We maintain an Internet site at www.ternium.com. Information contained in or otherwise accessible
through this website is not a part of this annual report. All references in this annual report to
this Internet site are inactive textual references to this URL, or uniform resource locator and
are for your informational reference only. We assume no responsibility for the information
contained on this site.
4
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This annual report and any other oral or written statements made by us to the public may
contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of and subject to the safe harbor
provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. This annual report contains
forward-looking statements, including with respect to certain of our plans and current goals and
expectations relating to Terniums future financial condition and performance.
Sections of this annual report that by their nature contain forward-looking statements
include, but are not limited to, Item 3. Key Information, Item 4. Information on the Company,
Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects and Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative
Disclosures About Market Risk.
We use words such as aim, will continue, will likely result, contemplate, seek to,
future, objective, goal, should, will pursue, anticipate, estimate, expect,
project, intend, plan, believe and words and terms of similar substance to identify
forward-looking statements, but they are not the only way we identify such statements. All
forward-looking statements are managements present expectations of future events and are subject
to a number of factors and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from
those described in the forward-looking statements. These factors include the risks related to our
business discussed under Item 3. Key InformationD. Risk Factors, and among them, the following:
|
|
uncertainties about the behavior of steel consumers in the markets in which Ternium operates
and sells its products; |
|
|
changes in the pricing environments in the countries in which Ternium operates; |
|
|
the impact in the markets in which Ternium operates of existing and new competitors,
including competitors that offer less expensive products and services, desirable or
innovative products, or have extensive resources or better financing, and whose presence may
affect Terniums customer mix, revenues and profitability; |
|
|
increases in the prices of raw materials, other inputs or energy or difficulties in
acquiring raw materials or other inputs or energy supply cut-offs; |
|
|
the policies of, and the economic, political and social developments and conditions in, the
countries in which Ternium owns facilities or other countries which have an impact on
Terniums business activities or investments; |
|
|
inflation or deflation and foreign exchange rates in the countries in which Ternium
operates; |
|
|
volatility in interest rates; |
|
|
the performance of the financial markets globally and in the countries in which Ternium
operates; |
|
|
changes in domestic and foreign laws, regulations and taxes; |
|
|
regional or general changes in asset valuations; |
|
|
our ability to successfully implement our business strategy or to grow through acquisitions,
greenfield projects, joint ventures and other investments; and |
|
|
other factors or trends affecting the flat and long steel industry generally and our
financial condition in particular. |
By their nature, certain disclosures relating to these and other risks are only estimates and could
be materially different from what actually occurs in the future. As a result, actual future gains
or losses that may affect Terniums financial condition and results of operations could differ
materially from those that have been estimated. You should not place undue reliance on the
forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this annual report. Except as
required by law, we are not under any obligation, and expressly disclaim any obligation, to update
or alter any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or
otherwise.
5
PART I
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers |
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable |
|
A. |
|
Selected Financial Data |
The selected consolidated financial data (or selected combined consolidated financial data, as
applicable) set forth below have been derived from our audited consolidated financial
statements (or combined consolidated financial statements, as applicable) for each of the
years and at the dates indicated. Our consolidated financial statements were prepared in
accordance with IFRS, and were audited by Price Waterhouse & Co. S.R.L., Argentina, an
independent registered public accounting firm that is a member firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers.
Ternium obtained control over Grupo Imsa, a Mexican steel processor, on July 26, 2007.
Accordingly, the audited consolidated financial statements of Ternium as of December 31, 2010,
2009 and 2008, and for the years then ended, included in this annual report consolidate the
results and other financial data of Grupo Imsa for the entire year, and the audited
consolidated financial statements of Ternium as of December 31, 2007, and for the year then
ended, included in this annual report consolidate the results and other financial data of
Grupo Imsa beginning on July 26, 2007. As a result, Terniums results and other financial data
for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 varied significantly from the results and
other financial data for the year ended December 31, 2007, and the results and other financial
data of each such year varied significantly from the results and other financial data for the
year ended December 31, 2006.
For a discussion of the currencies used in this annual report, exchange rates and accounting
principles affecting the financial information contained in this annual report, see
Presentation of Certain Financial and Other InformationAccounting Principles and
Currencies.
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands of U.S. dollars |
|
For the year ended December 31, |
|
(except number of shares and per share data) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Selected consolidated income statement data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
|
7,382,004 |
|
|
|
4,958,983 |
|
|
|
8,464,885 |
|
|
|
5,633,366 |
|
|
|
4,484,918 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
(5,665,254 |
) |
|
|
(4,110,370 |
) |
|
|
(6,128,027 |
) |
|
|
(4,287,671 |
) |
|
|
(3,107,629 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
1,716,750 |
|
|
|
848,613 |
|
|
|
2,336,858 |
|
|
|
1,345,695 |
|
|
|
1,377,289 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
(665,306 |
) |
|
|
(531,530 |
) |
|
|
(669,473 |
) |
|
|
(517,433 |
) |
|
|
(370,727 |
) |
Other operating income (expenses), net |
|
|
2,493 |
|
|
|
(20,700 |
) |
|
|
8,662 |
|
|
|
8,514 |
|
|
|
(4,739 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
1,053,937 |
|
|
|
296,383 |
|
|
|
1,676,047 |
|
|
|
836,776 |
|
|
|
1,001,823 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(72,969 |
) |
|
|
(105,810 |
) |
|
|
(136,111 |
) |
|
|
(133,109 |
) |
|
|
(96,814 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
27,347 |
|
|
|
21,141 |
|
|
|
32,178 |
|
|
|
41,613 |
|
|
|
33,903 |
|
Interest income Sidor financial asset |
|
|
61,012 |
|
|
|
135,952 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other financial income (expenses), net |
|
|
115,112 |
|
|
|
81,639 |
|
|
|
(693,192 |
) |
|
|
(38,498 |
) |
|
|
(40,432 |
) |
Equity in earnings of associated companies |
|
|
1,688 |
|
|
|
1,110 |
|
|
|
1,851 |
|
|
|
434 |
|
|
|
671 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax expense |
|
|
1,186,127 |
|
|
|
430,415 |
|
|
|
880,773 |
|
|
|
707,216 |
|
|
|
899,151 |
|
Income tax (expense) benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current and deferred income tax expense |
|
|
(406,657 |
) |
|
|
(91,314 |
) |
|
|
(258,969 |
) |
|
|
(291,345 |
) |
|
|
(353,044 |
) |
Reversal of deferred statutory profit sharing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96,265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
779,470 |
|
|
|
339,101 |
|
|
|
718,069 |
|
|
|
415,871 |
|
|
|
546,107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
428,023 |
|
|
|
157,095 |
|
|
|
579,925 |
|
|
|
444,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit for the year (1) |
|
|
779,470 |
|
|
|
767,124 |
|
|
|
875,164 |
|
|
|
995,796 |
|
|
|
990,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity holders of the Company |
|
|
622,076 |
|
|
|
717,400 |
|
|
|
715,418 |
|
|
|
784,490 |
|
|
|
795,424 |
|
Non-controlling interest |
|
|
157,394 |
|
|
|
49,724 |
|
|
|
159,746 |
|
|
|
211,306 |
|
|
|
195,151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
779,470 |
|
|
|
767,124 |
|
|
|
875,164 |
|
|
|
995,796 |
|
|
|
990,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
383,300 |
|
|
|
385,105 |
|
|
|
413,541 |
|
|
|
355,271 |
|
|
|
251,371 |
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding |
|
|
2,004,743,442 |
|
|
|
2,004,743,442 |
|
|
|
2,004,743,442 |
|
|
|
2,004,743,442 |
|
|
|
1,936,833,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share (expressed in USD per
share) for profit: (1) (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From continuing operations attributable to
the equity holders of the Company |
|
|
0.31 |
|
|
|
0.15 |
|
|
|
0.27 |
|
|
|
0.15 |
|
|
|
0.20 |
|
From discontinued operations attributable to the
equity holders of the Company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.21 |
|
|
|
0.09 |
|
|
|
0.24 |
|
|
|
0.21 |
|
For the year attributable to the equity holders
of the Company |
|
|
0.31 |
|
|
|
0.36 |
|
|
|
0.36 |
|
|
|
0.39 |
|
|
|
0.41 |
|
Dividends per share declared |
|
|
0.075 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
International Accounting Standard N° 1 (IAS 1) (Revised) requires that income for the
year as shown in the income statement includes the portion attributable to non-controlling
interest. Basic earnings per share, however, continue to be calculated on the basis of
income attributable solely to the equity holders of the Company. |
|
(2) |
|
Diluted earnings per share (expressed in USD per share), equals basic earnings per
share. Diluted earnings per share have been calculated giving effect to the conversion of
certain subordinated convertible loans. |
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands U.S. dollars |
|
|
|
(except number of shares and per |
|
At December 31, |
|
share data) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Selected consolidated balance
sheet data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current assets |
|
|
5,579,438 |
|
|
|
5,250,135 |
|
|
|
5,491,408 |
|
|
|
8,553,123 |
|
|
|
6,029,383 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
4,262,896 |
|
|
|
4,040,415 |
|
|
|
4,212,313 |
|
|
|
6,776,630 |
|
|
|
5,335,030 |
|
Other non-current assets (1) |
|
|
1,316,542 |
|
|
|
1,209,720 |
|
|
|
1,279,095 |
|
|
|
1,776,493 |
|
|
|
694,353 |
|
Current assets |
|
|
5,532,893 |
|
|
|
5,042,538 |
|
|
|
5,179,839 |
|
|
|
5,095,959 |
|
|
|
2,628,870 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
1,779,416 |
|
|
|
2,095,798 |
|
|
|
1,065,552 |
|
|
|
1,125,830 |
|
|
|
643,291 |
|
Other current assets (2) |
|
|
3,743,516 |
|
|
|
2,937,494 |
|
|
|
4,108,954 |
|
|
|
3,200,987 |
|
|
|
1,978,537 |
|
Non-current assets classified as
held for sale |
|
|
9,961 |
|
|
|
9,246 |
|
|
|
5,333 |
|
|
|
769,142 |
|
|
|
7,042 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
11,112,331 |
|
|
|
10,292,673 |
|
|
|
10,671,247 |
|
|
|
13,649,082 |
|
|
|
8,658,253 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital and reserves attributable
to the Companys equity holders
(3) |
|
|
5,880,740 |
|
|
|
5,296,342 |
|
|
|
4,597,370 |
|
|
|
4,452,680 |
|
|
|
3,757,558 |
|
Non-controlling interest |
|
|
1,135,361 |
|
|
|
964,897 |
|
|
|
964,094 |
|
|
|
1,805,243 |
|
|
|
1,626,119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current liabilities |
|
|
2,540,594 |
|
|
|
2,872,667 |
|
|
|
3,374,964 |
|
|
|
5,401,549 |
|
|
|
1,867,892 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings |
|
|
1,426,574 |
|
|
|
1,787,204 |
|
|
|
2,325,867 |
|
|
|
3,676,072 |
|
|
|
546,601 |
|
Deferred income tax |
|
|
877,742 |
|
|
|
857,297 |
|
|
|
810,160 |
|
|
|
1,327,768 |
|
|
|
982,091 |
|
Other non-current liabilities |
|
|
236,278 |
|
|
|
228,166 |
|
|
|
238,937 |
|
|
|
397,709 |
|
|
|
339,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
1,555,636 |
|
|
|
1,158,767 |
|
|
|
1,734,819 |
|
|
|
1,989,610 |
|
|
|
1,406,684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings |
|
|
513,083 |
|
|
|
539,525 |
|
|
|
941,460 |
|
|
|
406,239 |
|
|
|
507,241 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
1,042,553 |
|
|
|
619,242 |
|
|
|
793,359 |
|
|
|
1,369,608 |
|
|
|
899,443 |
|
Liabilities directly associated
with non-current assets
classified as held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
213,763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
4,096,230 |
|
|
|
4,031,434 |
|
|
|
5,109,783 |
|
|
|
7,391,159 |
|
|
|
3,274,576 |
|
Total equity and liabilities |
|
|
11,112,331 |
|
|
|
10,292,673 |
|
|
|
10,671,247 |
|
|
|
13,649,082 |
|
|
|
8,658,253 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of shares outstanding |
|
|
2,004,743,442 |
|
|
|
2,004,743,442 |
|
|
|
2,004,743,442 |
|
|
|
2,004,743,442 |
|
|
|
2,004,743,442 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As of December 31, 2010, 2009, 2008, 2007 and 2006, includes goodwill mainly related
to the acquisition of our Mexican subsidiaries for a total amount of USD750.1, USD708.6,
USD683.7, USD850.7 and USD397.9 million, respectively. |
|
(2) |
|
As of December 31, 2010, 2009, 2008 and 2007, includes deposits with maturity of more
than three months for a total amount of USD848.4, USD46.8, USD90.0 and USD65.3 million,
respectively. |
|
(3) |
|
The Companys share capital as of December 31, 2010, 2009, 2008, 2007 and 2006 was
represented by 2,004,743,442 shares, par value USD1.00 per share, for a total amount of
USD2,004.7 million. |
|
B. |
|
Capitalization and Indebtedness |
|
|
|
|
Not applicable. |
|
|
C. |
|
Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds |
|
|
|
|
Not applicable. |
|
|
D. |
|
Risk Factors |
|
|
|
|
You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below, together with all
other information contained in this annual report, before making any investment decision. Any
of these risks and uncertainties could have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition and results of operations, which could in turn affect the price of the
Companys shares and ADSs. |
8
Risks Relating to the Steel Industry
A downturn in the global economy would cause a reduction in worldwide demand for steel and
would have a material adverse effect on the steel industry and Ternium.
Terniums activities and results are affected by international economic conditions, as well as
by national and regional economic conditions in the markets where Ternium operates and/or
sells its products. A downturn in the global economy would reduce demand for steel products.
This would have a negative effect on Terniums business and results of operations.
If global macroeconomic conditions deteriorate, the outlook for steel producers would be
adversely affected. In particular, a recession or depression in the developed economies, such
as the one experienced by the United States and Europe in 2008 and 2009, or slower growth or
recessionary conditions in emerging economies that are substantial consumers of steel (such as
China and India, as well as emerging Asian markets, the Middle East, Latin America and the
Commonwealth of Independent States regions) would exact a heavy toll on the steel industry,
and would depress demand for our products and adversely affect our business and results of
operations.
A protracted fall in steel prices would have a material adverse effect on the results of
Ternium, as could price volatility.
Steel prices are volatile and are sensitive to trends in cyclical industries, such as the
construction, automotive, appliance and machinery industries, which are significant markets
for Terniums products. Steel prices in the international markets, which had been rising fast
during the first half of 2008, fell sharply beginning in the second half of 2008 as a result
of collapsing demand and the resulting excess capacity in the industry. The fall in prices
during this period adversely affected the results of steel producers generally, including
Ternium, as a result of lower revenues and writedowns of finished steel products and raw
material inventories. For example, in the second half of 2008 Ternium recorded a valuation
allowance on inventories in an amount of USD200 million and in the first half of 2009 it
recorded an additional valuation allowance in the amount of USD127.6 million. Beginning in the
second half of 2009, steel prices in the international markets rebounded mainly as a result of
the increase in the demand for steel in China and other emerging markets, and the subsidence
of the worldwide de-stocking process. This positive trend in international steel prices
partially reversed during the second half of 2010 as the increase in demand for steel products
was more than offset by new capacity additions and idled capacity restarts. A more balanced
market and the increase in steel demand by year-end 2010 supported a steel price rally during
the first quarter of 2011. Steel prices, however, decreased during the second quarter of 2011.
Historically, the length and nature of business cycles affecting the steel industry has been
unpredictable. A downturn in steel prices would materially and adversely affect Terniums
revenues and profitability.
In addition, the steel industry is highly competitive with respect to price, product quality,
customer service and technological advances, and competition has frequently limited the
ability of steel producers to raise the price of finished products to recover higher raw
material and energy costs. Moreover, in some cases, the governments of some countries are
reluctant to accept price increases of products which are used as raw materials for the
manufacture of other goods, as such increases could ultimately affect competitiveness or
increase inflation. In some other cases, governments restrict the ability of companies to pass
on to the domestic markets any increases in international prices. Accordingly, increases in
the purchase costs of raw materials, energy and other inputs might not be recoverable through
increased product prices.
A sudden increase in exports from China could have a significant impact on international steel
prices affecting Terniums profitability.
As demand for steel has surged in China, steel production capacity in that market has also
increased, and China is now the largest worldwide steel producing country, accounting for
approximately half of the worldwide steel production. Due to the size of the Chinese steel
market, a slowdown in steel consumption in that market could cause a sizable increase in the
volume of steel offered in the international steel markets, exerting a downward pressure on
sales and margins of steel companies operating in other markets and regions, including
Ternium.
9
Excess capacity, resulting in part from the recent financial crisis that reduced steel demand
and from a strong increase in steel production capacity in recent years, may hamper the steel
industrys ability to sustain adequate profitability.
In addition to economic conditions and prices, the steel industry is affected by other factors
such as worldwide production capacity and fluctuations in steel imports/exports and tariffs.
Historically, the steel industry has suffered, especially on downturn cycles, from substantial
over-capacity. Currently, as a result of the economic crisis and the increase in steel
production capacity in recent years, there are signs of excess capacity in all steel markets,
which is impacting the profitability of the steel industry. Accordingly, it is possible that
the industrys excess capacity will result in an extended period of depressed margins and
industry weakness.
Sales may fall as a result of fluctuations in industry inventory levels.
Inventory levels of steel products held by companies that purchase Terniums products can vary
significantly from period to period. These fluctuations can temporarily affect the demand for
Terniums products, as customers draw from existing inventory during periods of low investment
in construction and the other industry sectors that purchase Terniums products and accumulate
inventory during periods of high investment and, as a result, these companies may not purchase
additional steel products or maintain their current purchasing volume. Accordingly, Ternium
may not be able to increase or maintain its current levels of sales volumes or prices.
Price fluctuations or shortages in the supply of raw materials, slabs and energy could
adversely affect Terniums profitability.
Like other manufacturers of steel-related products, Terniums operations require substantial
amounts of raw materials, energy and other inputs from domestic and foreign suppliers. In
particular, the Ternium companies consume large quantities of iron ore, scrap, ferroalloys,
electricity, coal, natural gas, oxygen and other gases in operating their blast and electric
arc furnaces. In addition, Ternium is a large consumer of slabs and hot and cold-rolled steel,
which are used as inputs in the production process. Also, the availability and price of a
significant portion of the raw materials, slabs, energy and other inputs Ternium requires are
subject to market conditions and government regulation affecting supply and demand. For
example, shortages of natural gas in Argentina and the consequent supply restrictions imposed
by the government could lead to higher costs of production and eventually to production
cutbacks at Siderars facilities in Argentina. See Risks Relating to the Countries in Which
We OperateArgentinaRestrictions on the supply of energy to Siderars operations in
Argentina could curtail Siderars production and negatively impact Terniums results of
operations. In the past, Ternium has usually been able to procure sufficient supplies of raw
materials, slabs, energy and other inputs to meet its production needs; however, it could be
unable to procure adequate supplies in the future. Any protracted interruption,
discontinuation or other disruption of the supply of principal inputs to the Ternium companies
(including as a result of strikes, lockouts or other problems) would result in lost sales and
would have a material adverse effect on Terniums business and results of operations. For
example, during 2007 Companhia Vale do Rio Doce, or Vale, our main third party supplier of
iron ore, was unable to provide us with the quantities of iron ore required for Siderars
operations; in addition, there was limited transportation capacity from Brazil to Argentina
through the Paraguay and Parana rivers. For further information related to raw materials,
energy and other inputs requirements, see Item 4. Information on the CompanyB. Business
OverviewRaw Materials, Energy and Other Inputs.
The Ternium companies depend on a limited number of key suppliers.
The Ternium companies depend on certain key suppliers for their requirements of some of their
principal inputs, including Vale for iron ore and ArcelorMittal for slabs; there is also a
trend towards consolidation among suppliers of iron ore and other raw materials. The Ternium
companies have entered into long-term contracts for the supply of some
of their principal inputs (including iron ore) and it is expected that they will maintain and,
depending on the circumstances, renew these contracts. However, if any of the key suppliers
fails to deliver or there is a failure to renew these contracts, the Ternium companies could
face limited access to some raw materials, energy or other inputs, or higher costs and delays
resulting from the need to obtain their input requirements from other suppliers. As an
example, in 2007 Vale was unable to provide Siderar with the quantities of iron ore that it
required, forcing Siderar to import iron ore from Ternium Mexico.
10
Intense competition could cause Ternium to lose its share in certain markets and adversely
affect its sales and revenues.
The market for Terniums steel products is highly competitive, particularly with respect to
price, quality and service. In both the global and regional markets, Ternium competes against
other global and local producers of flat and long steel products, which in some cases have
greater financial and operating resources. Competition from larger steel manufacturers could
result in declining margins and reductions in sales volumes and revenues.
Terniums larger competitors could use their resources against Ternium in a variety of ways,
including by making additional acquisitions, implementing modernization programs, expanding
their production capacity, investing more aggressively in product development, and displacing
demand for Terniums products in certain markets. To the extent that these producers become
more efficient, Ternium could confront stronger competition and could fail to preserve its
current share of the relevant geographic or product markets. In addition, there has been a
trend in recent years toward steel industry consolidation among Terniums competitors, and
smaller competitors in the steel market today could become larger competitors in the future.
For example, in June 2006, Mittal Steel and Arcelor merged to create the worlds largest steel
company, ArcelorMittal; in April 2007, Tata Steel completed the acquisition of Corus; in 2008
Severstal acquired Sparrows Point, WCI Steel and Esmark (subsequently divesting in 2011
Sparrows Point, Warren and Wheeling); and in 2011 Sumitomo Metal Industries and Nippon Steel
Corporation announced plans to merge their operations. Regional players in Terniums markets
have also experienced consolidation through acquisitions; for example, Siderperu was acquired
by Gerdau in 2006, Sicartsa of Mexico was acquired by ArcelorMittal in December 2006 and
Aceria Paz del Rio of Colombia was acquired by Votorantim in March 2007. For further
information please see Item 4. Information on the CompanyB. Business
OverviewCompetition.
Moreover, competition from alternative materials (including aluminum, wood, concrete, plastic
and ceramics) could adversely affect the demand for, and consequently the market prices of,
certain steel products and, accordingly, could affect Terniums sales volumes and revenues.
Competition in the global and regional markets could also be affected by antidumping and
countervailing duties imposed on some producers in major steel markets and by the removal of
barriers to imported products in those countries where the Ternium companies direct their
sales. For further information please refer to Item 4. Information on the CompanyB.
Business OverviewRegulationsTrade regulations.
Risks Relating to our Business
If Ternium does not successfully implement its business strategy, its opportunities for growth
and its competitive position could be adversely affected.
Ternium plans to continue implementing its business strategy of enhancing its position as a
low cost steel producer, pursuing strategic growth opportunities, gaining further access to
iron ore and other inputs, developing value-added products, and providing services to a wider
range of customers in the local and export markets. Any of these components or Terniums
overall business strategy could be delayed or abandoned or could cost more than anticipated,
any of which could impact its competitive position and reduce its revenue and profitability.
For example, Ternium could fail to develop its projects to increase steel production capacity
and lose market share in its regional markets. Even if Ternium successfully implements its
business strategy, it may not yield the desired goals.
Recent and future acquisitions, green-field projects, significant investments and strategic
alliances could disrupt Terniums operations and adversely affect its profits. Ternium may not
realize the benefits it expects from these business decisions.
A key element of Terniums business strategy is to identify and pursue growth-enhancing
strategic opportunities. As part of this growth strategy, Ternium has acquired interests in
various companies, including Hylsamex, one of the
main steel producers in Mexico; and Grupo Imsa, a leading steel processor with operations in
Mexico, the United States and Guatemala. Additionally, Ternium has recently acquired a 54%
ownership interest in Colombia-based Ferrasa and Ferrasa Panamá S.A., a Panamanian corporation
(Ferrasa Panamá), and formed the Mexican joint venture company Tenigal S.R.L. de C.V.
(Tenigal) with Nippon Steel Corporation, for the manufacturing and sale of hot-dip
galvanized and galvannealed steel sheets to serve the Mexican automobile market.
We regularly consider capital investments, strategic acquisitions, greenfield projects and
alliances and we intend to actively pursue that growth strategy. However, any growth project
will depend upon market and financing conditions. We must necessarily base any assessment of
potential capital investments, acquisitions, green-field projects and alliances on assumptions
with respect to operations, profitability and other matters that may subsequently prove to be
incorrect. Our recent and future acquisitions, investments and alliances may not perform in
accordance with our expectations and could adversely affect our operations and profitability.
Furthermore, we may fail to find suitable acquisition targets or fail to consummate our
acquisitions under favorable conditions, or could be unable to successfully integrate any
acquired businesses into our operations. Moreover, we may also acquire, as part of future
acquisitions, assets unrelated to our business, and we may not be able to integrate them or
sell them under favorable terms and conditions.
11
These risks, and the fact that integration of any acquired businesses will require a
significant amount of time and resources of Terniums management and employees, could disrupt
Terniums ongoing business and could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial
condition and results of operations.
Ternium may be required to record a significant charge to earnings if it must reassess its
goodwill or other amortizable intangible assets.
In accordance with IFRS, management must test all of Terniums goodwill, intangible assets
with an indefinite useful life and intangible assets not yet available for use annually for
impairment, or more frequently if there are indicators of impairment, and recognize a non-cash
charge in an amount equal to any impairment. We recorded goodwill in connection with the
acquisition of our Mexican subsidiaries, the balance of which, as of December 31, 2010,
amounted to USD744.0 million. If Terniums management were to determine in the future that the
goodwill from the acquisition of our Mexican subsidiaries was impaired, Ternium would be
required to recognize a non-cash charge to write down the value of this goodwill, which would
adversely affect Terniums results of operations.
Labor disputes at Terniums operating subsidiaries could result in work stoppages and
disruptions to Terniums operations.
A substantial majority of Terniums employees at its manufacturing subsidiaries are
represented by labor unions and are covered by collective bargaining or similar agreements,
which are subject to periodic renegotiation. Strikes or work stoppages could occur prior to or
during the negotiations leading to new collective bargaining agreements, during wage and
benefits negotiations or, occasionally, during other periods for other reasons. Ternium could
also suffer plant stoppages or strikes if it were to implement cost reduction plans.
The various measures that Ternium has taken in order to become more competitive in Mexico,
during 2009 and 2010, and in Colombia, during 2010, have not resulted in significant labor
unrest. Notwithstanding this, we cannot assure that this situation will remain stable.
In Argentina, in early 2009, following a decrease in the level of activity since the last
quarter of 2008 due to the global economic downturn, Siderar downsized contractor and
subcontractor activities and temporary personnel, triggering adverse reactions from the
construction workers union and the steelworkers union. Later in 2009, during the
negotiations between Siderar and the steelworkers union regarding the annual bonuses related
to results, the unions called for work stoppages and other measures. During 2010, the various
measures that Siderar has taken in order to become more competitive did not result in
significant labor unrest. For more information on the collective bargaining agreement
applicable to most of Siderars employees in Argentina, see Item 6. Directors, Senior
Management and EmployeesD. EmployeesArgentina.
Any future stoppage, strike, disruption of operations or new collective bargaining agreements
could result in lost sales and could increase Terniums costs, thereby affecting our results
of operations. For more information on labor relations, see Item 6. Directors, Senior
Management and EmployeesD. Employees.
Terniums related party transactions with companies controlled by San Faustin may not always
be on terms as favorable as those that could be obtained from unaffiliated third parties.
Some of Terniums sales and purchases are made to and from other companies controlled by San
Faustin. These sales and purchases are primarily made in the ordinary course of business, and
we believe that they are made on terms no less favorable than those we could obtain from
unaffiliated third parties. Ternium will continue to engage in related party transactions in
the future, and these transactions may not be on terms as favorable as those that could be
obtained from unaffiliated third parties. For information concerning the principal
transactions between Ternium and related parties see Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related
Party TransactionsB. Related Party Transactions.
12
Following the completion of the Sidor nationalization process, Ternium is exposed to credit
concentration risk with Venezuela.
On May 7, 2009, Ternium completed the transfer of its entire 59.7% interest in Sidor to
Corporación Venezolana de Guayana, or CVG, a Venezuelan state-owned entity. Ternium agreed to
receive an aggregate amount of USD1.97 billion as compensation for its Sidor shares. Of that
amount, CVG paid USD400 million in cash at closing, and the balance was divided in two
tranches: the first tranche of USD945 million to be paid in six equal installments beginning
in August 2009 until November 2010, and the second tranche due in November 2010 and subject to
quarterly mandatory prepayment events based on the increase of the WTI crude oil price over
its May 6, 2009 level. CVG made all payments required to be made under the agreements
governing the transfer of Sidor to Venezuela except for the final payment due on November 8,
2010. On December 18, 2010, Ternium reached an agreement with CVG on the rescheduling of the
unpaid balance, which amounted to USD257 million. As provided in such refinancing agreement,
CVG paid USD7 million to Ternium in January 2011, and CVG is required to pay the remainder in
five quarterly installments, beginning on February 15, 2011 and ending on February 15, 2012.
The first two installments of USD31 million each were paid on February 16 and May 17, 2011.
The outstanding principal amount of the receivables with CVG is currently USD187 million.
Accordingly, we have significant credit concentration risk with Venezuela.
As security for the payment of the outstanding balance, Ternium received, duly endorsed in its
favor, promissory notes issued by Energía Argentina S.A. (Enarsa) and Compañía Administradora
del Mercado Mayorista Eléctrico S.A. (Cammesa) (both companies owned by the Argentine
government) to PDVSA Petróleo S.A. (a company owned by the Venezuelan government). Under the
agreements with CVG and Venezuela, in the event of non-compliance by CVG with its payment
obligations, Ternium has reserved the rights and remedies that it had prior to the transfer of
the Sidor shares in relation to any claim against Venezuela, subject to certain limitations,
including that Ternium may not claim an amount exceeding the outstanding balance due from CVG.
For more information on the Sidor nationalization process, see note 29 to our audited
consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report.
Changes in exchange rates or any limitation in the Ternium companies ability to hedge against
exchange rate fluctuations could adversely affect Terniums business and results.
The operations of the Ternium companies expose them to the effects of changes in foreign
currency exchange rates. Most of Terniums sales are carried out in currencies other than the
U.S. dollar. As a result of this foreign currency exposure, exchange rate fluctuations impact
the Ternium companies results and net worth as reported in their income statements and
statements of financial position in the form of both translation risk and transaction risk.
In the ordinary course of business, the Ternium companies enter from time to time into
exchange rate derivatives agreements to manage their exposure to exchange rate changes. Future
regulatory or financial restrictions in the countries where Ternium operates may affect its
ability to mitigate its exposure to exchange rate fluctuations, and thus cause an adverse
impact on Terniums results of operations and financial condition.
Risks Relating to our Mining Activities
Iron ore is one of the principal raw materials used by Terniums operating subsidiaries.
Ternium has equity interests in two iron ore mining companies in Mexico: a 100% interest in
Las Encinas and a 50% interest in Consorcio Minero Benito Juárez Peña Colorada, S.A. de C.V.,
which operates Peña Colorada, Mexicos largest iron ore mine. In addition, Ternium may seek to
expand its mining activities in the future. Our present and future mining activities are or
would be subject to particular risks, as follows:
Our mining activities depend on governmental concessions and on our ability to reach and
maintain lease agreements (or other agreements for the use of land) with the owner of the real
estate where the mines are located.
Our mining activities are subject to specific regulations and depend on concessions and
authorizations granted by governmental authorities. Amendments to applicable law and
regulations may change the terms pursuant to which we are required to pursue our exploration,
mining and ore processing activities. Such changes may result in new taxes or royalties or
require modifications to the processes and technologies used in our mining activities, leading
to unexpected capital expenditures and higher costs. If the relevant government authority
determines that we are not in compliance with our obligations as concessionaires, it may
terminate our concession. Furthermore, in order to explore or exploit mines it is necessary to
obtain the right to occupy and use the land where the mines are situated. Even though
government regulations frequently establish provisions intended to facilitate the
establishment of such rights, in some cases it may be difficult to reach and maintain
agreements with the owners or such agreements may be excessively onerous. If we are unable to
establish use and occupancy rights on acceptable terms, our mining activities may be
compromised.
13
Our exploration activities are subject to uncertainties as to the result of such exploration;
even if the exploration activities lead to the discovery of ore deposits, the effective
exploitation of such deposits remains subject to several risks.
Exploration activities are highly speculative, involve substantial risks and may be
unproductive. We may incur substantial costs for exploration which do not yield the expected
results. The failure to find sufficient and adequate reserves could adversely affect our
business. In addition, even if ore deposits are discovered, our ability to pursue exploitation
activities may be delayed for a long time during which market conditions may vary. Significant
resources and time need to be invested in order to establish ore resources through
exploration, define the appropriate processes that shall be undertaken, obtain environmental
licenses, concessions and other permits, build the necessary facilities and infrastructure for
greenfield projects and obtain the ore or extract the metals from the ore. If a project does
not turn out to be economically feasible by the time we are able to exploit it, we may incur
substantial write-offs.
Our expected costs for exploration or exploitation activities may vary significantly and
affect our expected results.
We may be subject to increased costs or delays relating to the acquisition of adequate
equipment for the exploration and exploitation of ore deposits. We may also fail to obtain any
necessary permits, or experience significant delays in connection with the issuance of such
permits. Adverse mining conditions, whether permanent or temporary, may lead to a significant
increase on our costs and/or affect our ability to produce the expected quantities of mineral.
All of the above may adversely affect our ability to conduct our mining activities as planned
and affect our expected results of operations.
Difficulties in the relationships with local communities may adversely affect our mining
activities.
Communities living near areas where we operate may take actions to oppose and interfere with
our mining activities. Although we make significant efforts to maintain good relationships
with such communities, actions taken by them may hamper our ability to conduct our mining
activities as planned, or significantly increase the cost of exploring and/or exploiting the
mines and adversely affect our business and results of operations. For example, in Aquila,
Mexico, during 2011, native communities blocked roads demanding higher compensation for the
use of land for mining activities. These actions prevented Ternium from transporting iron ore
from the mines to the pelletizing facilities for several weeks and ultimately resulted in a
technical stoppage of the mining activities in Aquila for several days.
Risks Relating to the Structure of the Company
As a holding company, the Companys ability to pay cash dividends depends on the results of
operations and financial condition of its subsidiaries and could be restricted by legal,
contractual or other limitations.
The Company conducts all its operations through subsidiaries. Dividends or other intercompany
transfers of funds from those subsidiaries are the Companys primary source of funds to pay
its expenses, debt service and dividends and to repurchase shares or ADSs. The Company does
not and will not conduct operations at the holding company level.
The ability of the Companys subsidiaries to pay dividends and make other payments to the
Company will depend on their results of operations and financial condition and could be
restricted by, among other things, applicable corporate and other laws and regulations,
including those imposing foreign exchange controls, and agreements and commitments of such
subsidiaries. If earnings and cash flows of the Companys operating subsidiaries are
substantially reduced, the Company may not be in a position to meet its operational needs or
to pay dividends. In addition, the Companys ability to pay dividends is subject to legal and
other requirements and restrictions in effect at the holding company level. For example, the
Company may only pay dividends out of net profits, retained earnings and distributable
reserves and premiums, each as defined and calculated in accordance with Luxembourg laws and
regulations.
14
The Companys controlling shareholder may be able to take actions that do not reflect the will
or best interests of other shareholders.
As
of June 6, 2011, San Faustin beneficially owned 62.02% and Tenaris, which is also
controlled by San Faustin, held 11.46% of our outstanding voting shares. Rocca & Partners
Stichting Administratiekantoor Aandelen San Faustin (RP STAK) controls a significant portion
of the voting power of San Faustin and has the ability to influence matters affecting, or
submitted to a vote of, the shareholders of San Faustin. As a result, RP STAK is indirectly
able to elect a substantial majority of the members of the Companys board of directors and
has the power to determine the outcome of most actions requiring shareholder approval,
including, subject to the requirements of Luxembourg law, the payment of dividends. The
decisions of the controlling shareholder may not reflect the will or best interests of other
shareholders. For example, the Companys articles of association permit the board of directors
to waive, limit or suppress preemptive rights in certain cases. Accordingly, our controlling
shareholder may cause our board of directors to approve an issuance of shares for
consideration without preemptive rights, thereby diluting the minority interest in the
Company. See Risk FactorsRisks Relating to our ADSsHolders of our shares and ADSs in
the United States may not be able to exercise preemptive rights in certain cases and Item 7.
Major Shareholders and Related Party TransactionsA. Major Shareholders.
Remaining minority interests in our subsidiaries could delay or impede our ability to complete
our strategy.
We do not own one hundred percent of the interests in certain of our subsidiaries.
Approximately 25.97% of Siderar is held by Administración Nacional de la Seguridad Social
(ANSeS), Argentinas governmental social security agency, approximately 10.53% is publicly
held, and approximately 2.56% is held by certain Siderar employees. ANSeS became a significant
shareholder of Siderar in the last quarter of 2008 as a result of the nationalization of
Argentinas private pension system, which caused assets under administration of Argentinas
private pension fundsincluding significant interests in publicly traded companies, such as
Siderar, held by such fundsto be transferred to ANSeS. For further information on the latest
developments involving Siderar following the enactment of Decree 441/2011, see Item 5.
Operating and Financial Review and ProspectsG. Recent Developments Recent developments
involving Siderar.
Ternium holds a 54% ownership interest in Ferrasa and Ferrasa Panamá, and the former
controlling shareholders hold the remaining 46% interest in each of Ferrasa and Ferrasa
Panamá.Ternium holds a 51% ownership interest in Tenigal, and Nippon Steel Corporation holds
the remaining 49%.
The existence of a minority interest in these subsidiaries could prevent Ternium from taking
actions that, while beneficial to Ternium, might not be beneficial to each relevant
subsidiary, considered separately. As a result, we could be delayed or impeded in the full
implementation of our strategy or the maximization of Terniums competitive strengths.
Risks Relating to the Countries in Which We Operate
Negative economic, political and regulatory developments in certain markets where Ternium has
a significant portion of its operations and assets could hurt Terniums financial condition,
shipments and prices and disrupt its manufacturing operations, thereby adversely affecting its
results of operations and financial condition.
The results of Terniums operations are subject to the risks of doing business in emerging
markets, principally in Mexico and Argentina and to a lesser extent in Colombia, and have
been, and could in the future be, affected from time to time to varying degrees by economic,
political and regulatory developments, such as forced divestiture of assets; restrictions on
production, domestic sales, imports and exports; interruptions to essential energy inputs;
exchange and/or transfer restrictions; inflation; devaluation; war or other international
conflicts; civil unrest and local security concerns that threaten the safe operation of our
facilities; direct and indirect price controls; tax increases; changes (including retroactive)
in the enforcement or interpretation of tax laws and other retroactive tax claims or
challenges; expropriation of property; changes in laws or regulations; cancellation of
contract rights; and delays or denial of governmental approvals. Both the likelihood of such
occurrences and their overall effect upon Ternium vary greatly from country to country and are
not predictable. Realization of these risks could have an adverse impact on the results of
operations and financial condition of Terniums subsidiaries located in the affected country
and, depending on their materiality, on the results of operations and financial condition of
Ternium as a whole.
Mexico
Ternium has significant manufacturing operations and assets located in Mexico and a majority
of its sales are made in this country. Terniums main revenues derive from its Mexican
operations, therefore, are related to market conditions in Mexico and to changes in its
economic activity. Terniums business could be materially and adversely affected by economic,
political and regulatory developments in in this country.
15
Economic and social conditions and government policies in Mexico could negatively impact
Terniums business and results of operations.
In the past, Mexico has experienced several periods of slow or negative economic growth, high
inflation, high interest rates, currency devaluation and other economic problems. Furthermore,
the Mexican national economy tends to reflect changes in the economic environment in the
United States. If problems such as deterioration in Mexicos economic conditions reemerge, or
social instability, political unrest, reduction in government spending or other adverse social
developments reemerge in the future, they could lead to continued volatility in the foreign
exchange and financial markets, and, depending on their severity and duration, could adversely
affect the business, results of operations, financial condition or liquidity of Ternium.
Moreover, adverse economic conditions in Mexico could result in, among other things, higher
interest rates accompanied by reduced opportunities for refunding or refinancing, reduced
domestic consumption of Terniums products, decreased operating results and delays in capital
expenditures. In addition, high incidences of violence and crime in Mexico related to drug
trafficking could affect our day-to-day operations and could also result in an economic
slowdown, reducing domestic demand for our products and thereby having an adverse effect on
our business. A continued deterioration of the security situation may result in significant
obstacles or additional costs to the implementation of our growth plans in Mexico.
Mexican peso volatility could have a negative impact on Terniums financial condition.
Ternium could have, at any given time, a long or short net Mexican peso financial position.
The fluctuation of the Mexican peso against the U.S. dollar (whether an appreciation or a
devaluation) could result in financial losses. For example, most of Ternium Mexicos trade
receivables are Mexican peso-denominated; accordingly, in the event of a Mexican peso
devaluation, the financial condition of our Mexican operations, when measured in U.S. dollars,
could be adversely affected.
Changes in the Mexican tax system could have an adverse effect on Terniums Mexican
operations.
On September 14, 2007, the Mexican Congress passed a tax reform act, which created a new flat
tax (the impuesto empresarial a tasa única or IETU) and, effective January 1, 2008, replaced
the Mexican assets tax (the impuesto al activo or IMPAC). The act also established certain
temporary and operational limits for the recoverability of assets tax credits. The IETU works
as a corporate income tax supplement and is levied on income received. Ternium Mexico
consolidates its various subsidiaries for purposes of determination and payment of Mexican
corporate income tax. However, consolidation was not permitted for purposes of determination
and payment of the new flat tax, nor was it possible to apply corporate income tax credits
against IETU liabilities.
Additionally, on November 5, 2009, the Mexican Congress passed a tax reform modifying the
Income Tax Law. As a result, the statutory tax rate was raised from 28% to 30% for the years
2010, 2011 and 2012, and subsequently reduced to 29% for 2013 and to 28% for 2014. The tax
consolidation regime was also modified. According to such changes and effective for the fiscal
years ending after January 1, 2010, the tax deferred in the sixth preceding fiscal year under
the tax consolidation regime has to be paid in five annual installments of 25%, 25%, 20%, 15%,
and 15%, respectively, with the first installment being due in 2010.
Future changes in the Mexican tax system may affect our Mexican subsidiaries tax burden,
thereby affecting our financial condition and results of operations.
Argentina
Terniums subsidiary Siderar has significant manufacturing operations and assets located in
Argentina and a significant portion of its sales are made in Argentina. Terniums main
revenues from Siderars operations, therefore, are related to market conditions in Argentina
and to changes in Argentinas gross domestic product, or GDP, and per capita disposable
income. Accordingly, Siderars business could be materially and adversely affected by
economic, political, social, fiscal and regulatory developments in Argentina.
16
Economic and political instability, which resulted in a severe recession in 2002, may occur in
the future, thereby adversely affecting our business, financial condition and results.
Our business and results of operations in Argentina have closely followed macroeconomic
conditions. Domestic sales of Siderar were severely affected by Argentinas recession during
2001 and 2002. The domestic economic recovery over the 2003 2008 period, with sustained
growth in construction, agriculture, industrial activity and particularly a significant
improvement in the automobile industry, led to a recovery of steel shipments to the Argentine
domestic market. During the last quarter of 2008, however, the downturn in the global economy
reached the Argentine economy and had a significant adverse impact on our shipments to the
Argentine domestic market until their recovery beginning in the second quarter of 2009.
The Argentine economy is currently facing significant challenges. Inflation is high, as
further discussed below, and the economy has been affected by supply constraints. Capital
investment in general has lagged due to, among other factors, political and economic
uncertainties and government actions, including price controls, export taxes, the
nationalization of Argentinas private pension system, an increased level of government
intervention in, or limitations to, the conduct of business in the private sector, and other
measures affecting investor confidence. For example, as price controls are concerned, in
February 2011, Argentinas Secretary of Commerce issued Resolution 14/2011 requiring that
prices for steel products sold in Argentina, including products sold by Siderar, be limited to
those in effect on January 21, 2011, and that sales of steel products be invoiced in Argentine
pesos. Although Ternium believes that price controls are illegal under Argentine law and
resolution 14/2011 was ultimately revoked, other price control measures could be imposed in
the future.
Declining capital investment may affect growth and, accordingly, cause demand for our local
subsidiarys products in the domestic market to drop. A lack of financing alternatives could
significantly impair Argentinas ability to sustain the economys activity level, foster
economic growth and/or avert a sovereign default.
Economic conditions in Argentina have deteriorated rapidly in the past and may deteriorate
rapidly in the future. The Argentine economy may not continue to grow and economic instability
may return. In addition, presidential and Congress elections in Argentina will take place in
October 2011, and the general uncertainty as to who will win the elections (and, thus, the
impact that the outcome of the elections could have on the Argentine economy) could have an
adverse effect on Siderar and the Argentine economy as a whole. Our business and results of
operations in Argentina could be adversely affected by rapidly changing economic conditions in
Argentina or by the Argentine governments policy response to such conditions.
Inflation may undermine economic growth in Argentina and impact our costs, thereby adversely
affecting our results of operations and financial position.
In the past, inflation has undermined the Argentine economy and the governments ability to
stimulate economic growth. Beginning in 2004, inflation indicators began showing significant
year-over-year increases, signaling a trend characteristic of an inflationary economy. The
pace of inflation has increased rapidly and significantly over the last few years; however,
since 2007 Argentinas official inflation data published by the Instituto Nacional de
Estadística y Censos (INDEC), Argentinas national statistics institute, have been subject
to changes in calculation; following the implementation of such changes, the official
inflation figures have been consistently disputed by independent economists. For example, the
annual inflation rates based on the data published by INDEC were 7.2%, 7.7% and 10.9% for
December 2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively, while private estimates, on average, refer to
annual rates of inflation significantly higher than those published by INDEC.
Sustained high inflation in Argentina could negatively impact our results of operations and
financial position as the Argentine peso-denominated costs (mainly labor-related costs) at
Siderar increase, thereby affecting its cost-competitiveness and deteriorating its margins. In
addition, a high inflation economy could undermine Argentinas foreign competitiveness in
international markets and negatively affect the economys activity and employment levels.
Argentine inflation rate volatility makes it impossible to estimate with reasonable certainty
the extent to which activity levels and results of operations of Siderar could be affected by
inflation in the future.
The Argentine government has increased taxes on Argentine companies and could further increase
the fiscal burden in the future.
Since 1992, the Argentine government has not permitted the application of an inflation
adjustment on the value of fixed assets for tax purposes. As a result of the substantial
devaluation of the Argentine peso in 2002 and a significant inflation in recent years, the
amounts that the Argentine tax authorities permit Siderar to deduct as depreciation for its
past investments in plant, property and equipment have been substantially reduced in real
terms, thus creating artificial gains for tax purposes which result in higher-than-nominal
effective income tax charges. If the Argentine government continues to increase the tax burden
on Siderars operations, Terniums results of operations and financial condition could be
adversely affected.
17
The Argentine Central Bank has imposed restrictions on the transfer of funds outside of
Argentina and other exchange controls in the past and may do so in the future, which could
prevent Ternium from paying dividends or other amounts from cash generated by Siderars
operations.
Since January 2002, the Argentine government and Central Bank have introduced several rules
and regulations to reduce volatility in the ARS/USD exchange rate, and has implemented formal
and informal restrictions on capital inflows into Argentina and capital outflows from
Argentina. In addition, Siderar is currently required to repatriate U.S. dollars collected in
connection with exports from Argentina (including U.S. dollars obtained through advance
payment and pre-financing facilities) into Argentina and convert them into Argentine pesos at
the relevant exchange rate applicable on the date of repatriation. The existing controls and
restrictions, and any additional restrictions of this kind that may be imposed in the future,
could expose Ternium to the risk of losses arising from fluctuations or affect Terniums
ability to finance its investments and operations in Argentina or impair Terniums ability to
transfer funds generated by Siderar in U.S. dollars outside Argentina, for example, to fund
the payment of dividends or to undertake investments and other activities that require
payments in U.S. dollars. For additional information on current Argentine exchange
controls and restrictions, see Item 10. Additional InformationD. Exchange Controls.
Restrictions on the supply of energy to Siderars operations in Argentina could curtail
Siderars production and negatively impact Terniums results of operations.
There has been an insufficient level of investment in natural gas and electricity supply and
transport capacity in Argentina in recent years. Over the course of the last several years,
demand for natural gas and electricity has increased substantially, driven by a recovery in
economic conditions and low prices in comparison with alternative fuel sources. This in turn
resulted in shortages of natural gas and electricity to residential and industrial users
during periods of high demand. For example, in recent years Siderars operations experienced
constraints in their natural gas supply requirements and interruptions in their electricity
supply at peak hours on many occasions. If demand for natural gas and electricity increases
and a matching increase in natural gas and electricity supply and transport capacity fails to
materialize on a timely basis, Siderars production in Argentina (or that of its main
customers and suppliers) could be curtailed, and Siderars sales and revenues could decline.
Although Siderar could take measures, such as the purchase of alternative fuels such as fuel
oil, to limit the effect of supply restrictions on its operations in Argentina, such efforts
might not be sufficient to avoid an impact on Siderars production in Argentina and Siderar
might not be able to similarly limit the effect of future supply restrictions. See Risks
Relating to the Steel IndustryPrice fluctuations or shortages in the supply of raw
materials, slabs and energy could adversely affect Terniums profitability above.
Colombia
Ternium has manufacturing operations and assets located in Colombia and a share of its sales
is made in Colombia. Terniums main revenues from its Colombian operations, therefore, are
related to market conditions in Colombia and
to changes in Colombias gross domestic product, or GDP, and per capita disposable income.
Accordingly, Terniums business could be adversely affected by economic, political and
regulatory developments in Colombia.
Colombia has experienced internal security issues that have had or could have in the future a
negative effect on the Colombian economy.
Colombia has experienced internal security issues, primarily due to the activities of
guerrillas, paramilitary groups and drug cartels. In the past, guerrillas have targeted the
crude oil pipelines, including the Oleoducto Transandino, Caño Limón-Coveñas and Ocensa
pipelines, and other related infrastructure disrupting activities in the oil industry. These
activities, their possible escalation and the effects associated with them have had and may
have in the future a negative impact on the Colombian economy, thus affecting our business in
the country.
18
Colombian peso volatility could have a negative impact on Terniums financial condition.
Ternium could have, at any given time, a long or short net Colombian peso financial position.
The fluctuation of the Colombian peso against the U.S. dollar (whether an appreciation or a
devaluation) could result in financial losses. For example, most of Ferrasas trade
receivables are Colombian peso-denominated; accordingly, in the event of a Colombian peso
devaluation, the financial condition of our Colombian operations, when measured in U.S.
dollars, could be adversely affected.
Certain Regulatory Risks and Litigation Risks
International trade actions or regulations and trade-related legal proceedings could adversely
affect Terniums sales, revenues and overall business.
International trade-related legal actions and restrictions pose a constant risk for Terniums
international operations and sales throughout the world. We are a significant purchaser of
slabs for our operations in Mexico (which we buy from various suppliers in Mexico and
overseas) and a significant purchaser of steel products for our operations in Colombia (which
we buy from our subsidiaries overseas and from various suppliers in Colombia and overseas).
Imports of slabs into Mexico and steel products in Colombia are, subject to certain
conditions, imported under lower import duties or through a temporary import regime. Should
imports of slabs into Mexico or steel products into Colombia grow, we may not be able to make
such imports under the lower duty regime, or the Mexican or Colombian government may increase
the applicable duties or impose restrictions in the quantities allowed to be imported.
Increased trade liberalization has reduced certain of Terniums imported input costs and
increased Terniums access to many foreign markets. However, greater trade liberalization in
its domestic markets is increasing competition for Ternium in such markets. In recent times,
as a consequence of the global downturn, the number of antidumping and countervailing actions
limiting trade has increased substantially. Accordingly, producers from certain countries find
themselves excluded from certain markets and in need to find alternatives for their products.
Terniums domestic market share could be eroded in the face of foreign imports if tariffs and
other barriers are reduced or eliminated in Terniums domestic markets. Terniums increased
exports to foreign markets where import barriers have been reduced may not completely offset
domestic market share losses resulting from increased foreign competition.
Countries can impose restrictive import duties and other restrictions on imports under various
national trade laws. The timing and nature of the imposition of trade-related restrictions
potentially affecting Terniums exports are unpredictable. Trade restrictions on Terniums
exports could adversely affect Terniums ability to sell products abroad and, as a result,
Terniums profit margins, financial condition and overall business could suffer. One
significant source of trade restrictions results from countries imposition of so-called
antidumping and countervailing duties, as well as safeguard measures. These duties can
severely limit or altogether impede an exporters ability to export to relevant markets. In
several of Terniums export destinations, such as the United States or Europe, safeguard
duties and other protective measures have been imposed against a broad array of steel imports
in certain periods of excess global production capacity, as is currently the case.
Furthermore, certain domestic producers have filed antidumping and/or countervailing duty
actions against particular steel imports. Some of these actions have led to restrictions on
Terniums exports of certain types of steel products to certain steel markets. As domestic
producers filing of such actions is largely unpredictable, additional antidumping,
countervailing duty or other such import restrictions could be imposed in the future, limiting
Terniums export sales to and potential growth in those markets. See Item 4. Information on
the CompanyB. Business OverviewRegulationsTrade regulations.
The cost of complying with environmental regulations and potential environmental and product
liabilities may increase our operating costs and negatively impact our business, financial
condition, results of operations and prospects.
We are subject to a wide range of local, provincial and national laws, regulations, permit
requirements and decrees relating to the protection of human health and the environment,
including laws and regulations relating to hazardous materials and radioactive materials and
environmental protection governing air emissions, water discharges and waste management. Laws
and regulations protecting the environment have become increasingly complex and more stringent
and expensive to implement in recent years. International environmental requirements vary.
Environmental laws and regulations may, in some cases, impose strict liability rendering a
person liable for damages to natural resources or threats to public health and safety without
regard to negligence or fault. Some environmental laws provide for joint and several strict
liability for remediation of spills and releases of hazardous substances. These laws and
regulations may expose us to liability for the conduct of or conditions caused by others or
for acts that were in compliance with all applicable laws at the time they were performed.
19
Compliance with applicable requirements and the adoption of new requirements could have a
material adverse effect on our consolidated statement of financial position, results of
operations or cash flows. The ultimate impact of complying with environmental laws and
regulations is not always clearly known or determinable since regulations under some of these
laws have not yet been promulgated or are undergoing revision. The expenditures necessary to
remain in compliance with these laws and regulations, including site or other remediation
costs, or costs incurred from potential environmental liabilities, could have a material
adverse effect on our financial condition and profitability. While we incur and will continue
to incur expenditures to comply with applicable laws and regulations, there always remains a
risk that environmental incidents or accidents may occur that may negatively affect our
reputation or our operations.
Some of the activities for which Ternium supplies products, such as canning for consumption,
construction and the automotive industry are subject to inherent risks that could result in
death, personal injury, property damage or environmental pollution, and subject us to
potential product liability risks that could extend to being held liable for the damages
produced by such products. Furthermore, Terniums products are also sold to, and used in,
certain safety-critical appliances. Actual or claimed defects in our products may give rise to
claims against us for losses suffered by our customers and expose us to claims for damages.
The insurance we maintain may not be adequate or available to protect us in the event of a
claim, its coverage may be limited, canceled or otherwise terminated, or the amount of our
insurance may be less than the related impact on enterprise value after a loss.
Risks Relating to our ADSs
The market price for our ADSs could be highly volatile.
Volatility in the price of our ADSs may be caused by factors outside of our control and may be
unrelated or disproportionate to Terniums operating results. In particular, announcements of
potentially adverse developments, such as proposed regulatory changes, new government
investigations or the commencement or threat of litigation against Ternium, as well as
announced changes in Terniums business plans or those of its competitors could adversely
affect the trading price of our ADSs, regardless of the likely outcome of those developments
or proceedings. Broad market and industry factors could adversely affect the market price of
our ADSs, regardless of its actual operating performance. As an example of this volatility,
the price of our ADSs reached USD45.99 on June 6, 2008, before falling to USD4.55 on November
20, 2008, and then recovering to a closing price of USD35.42 on December 31, 2009.
Furthermore, the trading price of our ADSs could suffer as a result of developments in
emerging markets. Although the Company is organized as a Luxembourg corporation, almost all of
its assets and operations are located in Latin America. Financial and securities markets for
companies with a substantial portion of their assets and operations in Latin America are, to
varying degrees, influenced by political, economic and market conditions in emerging market
countries. Although market conditions are different in each country, investor reaction to
developments in one country can have significant effects on the securities of issuers with
assets or operations in other emerging markets, including Mexico, Argentina and Colombia. See
Risks Relating to the Countries in Which We Operate.
In deciding whether to purchase, hold or sell our ADSs, you may not be able to access as much
information about us as you would in the case of a U.S. company.
There may be less publicly available information about us than is regularly published by or
about U.S. issuers. Also, Luxembourg regulations governing the securities of Luxembourg
companies may not be as extensive as those in effect in the United States, and Luxembourg law
and regulations in respect of corporate governance matters might not be as protective of
minority shareholders as state corporation laws in the United States. Furthermore, IFRS differ
in certain material aspects from the accounting standards used in the United States.
20
Holders of our ADSs may not be able to exercise, or may encounter difficulties in the exercise
of, certain rights afforded to shareholders.
Certain shareholders rights under Luxembourg law, including the right to vote, to receive
dividends and distributions, to bring actions, to examine the books and records and to
exercise appraisal rights may not be available to holders of ADSs, or may be subject to
restrictions and special procedures for their exercise, as holders of ADSs only have those
rights that are expressly granted to them in the deposit agreement. The Bank of New York
Mellon, as depositary, through its custodian agent, is the registered shareholder of the
deposited shares underlying the ADSs and therefore only the depositary can exercise the
shareholders rights in connection with the deposited shares. For example, if we make a
distribution in the form of securities, the depositary is allowed, at its discretion, to sell
that right to acquire those securities on your behalf and to instead distribute the net
proceeds to you. Also, under certain circumstances, such as our failure to provide the
depositary with voting materials on a timely basis, you may not be able to vote by giving
instructions to the depositary. In the circumstances specified in the deposit agreement, if
the depositary does not receive voting instructions from the holder of ADSs or the
instructions are not in proper form, then the depositary shall deem such holder to have
instructed the depositary to give, and the depositary shall give, a proxy to a person
designated by the Company with respect to that amount of shares underlying such ADSs to vote
that amount of shares underlying such ADSs in favor of any proposals or recommendations of the
Company (including any recommendation by the Company to vote that amount of shares underlying
such ADSs on any issue in accordance with the majority shareholders vote on that issue) as
determined by the appointed proxy. No instruction shall be deemed given and no proxy shall be
given with respect to any matter as to which the Company informs the depositary that (x) it
does not wish such proxy given, (y) substantial opposition exists, or (z) the matter
materially and adversely affects the rights of the holders of ADSs.
Holders of our shares and ADSs in the United States may not be able to exercise preemptive
rights in certain cases.
Pursuant to Luxembourg corporate law, existing shareholders of the Company are generally
entitled to preemptive subscription rights in the event of capital
increases and issues of shares against cash contributions. Under the Companys articles of association, the board of
directors had been authorized to waive, limit or suppress such preemptive subscription rights
until October 26, 2010; such authorization was renewed in the Extraordinary General Meeting of
Shareholders held on June 2, 2010 until July 15, 2015. The Company, however, may issue shares
without preemptive rights only if the newly issued shares are issued:
|
|
|
for, within, in conjunction with or related to, an initial
public offering of the shares of the Company on one or more regulated markets (in one or more instances); |
|
|
|
for consideration other than cash; |
|
|
|
upon conversion of convertible bonds or other instruments convertible into shares
of the Company; provided, however, that the preemptive subscription rights of the then
existing shareholders shall apply in connection with any issuance of convertible bonds or
other instruments convertible into shares of the Company for cash; or |
|
|
|
subject to a certain maximum percentage, as compensation to directors, officers,
agents or employees of the Company, its direct or indirect subsidiaries or its
affiliates, including without limitation the direct issuance of
shares or the issuance of shares upon exercise of options, rights convertible into shares or similar instruments
convertible or exchangeable into shares issued or created to provide compensation or
incentives to directors, officers, agents or employees of the Company, its direct or
indirect subsidiaries or its affiliates. |
For further details, see Item 10. Additional InformationB. Memorandum and Articles of
Association.
Furthermore, holders of our shares and ADSs in the United States may, in any event, not be
able to exercise any preemptive rights, if granted, for shares unless those shares are
registered under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act) with
respect to those rights or an exemption from registration is available. We intend to evaluate,
at the time of any rights offering, the costs and potential liabilities associated with the
exercise by holders of shares and ADSs of the preemptive rights for shares, and any other
factors we consider appropriate at the time, and then to make a decision as to whether to
register additional shares. We may decide not to register any additional shares, requiring a
sale by the depositary of the holders rights and a distribution of the proceeds thereof.
Should the depositary not be permitted or otherwise be unable to sell preemptive rights, the
rights may be allowed to lapse with no consideration to be received by the holders of the
ADSs.
21
It may be difficult to obtain or enforce judgments against the Company in U.S. courts or
courts outside of the United States.
The Company is a public limited liability company (société anonyme) organized under the laws
of Luxembourg, and most of its assets are located outside of the United States. Furthermore,
most of the Companys directors and officers named in this annual report reside outside the
United States. As a result, investors may not be able to effect service of process within the
United States upon the Company or its directors or officers or to enforce against the Company
or them in U.S. courts judgments predicated upon the civil liability provisions of U.S.
federal securities law. Likewise, it may be difficult for a U.S. investor to bring an original
action in a Luxembourg court predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the U.S.
federal securities laws against the Company, its directors or its officers. There is also
uncertainty with regard to the enforceability of original actions in courts outside the United
States of civil liabilities predicated upon the civil liability provisions of U.S. federal
securities laws. Furthermore, the enforceability in courts outside the United States of
judgments entered by U.S. courts predicated upon the civil liability provisions of U.S.
federal securities law will be subject to compliance with procedural requirements under
applicable local law, including the condition that the judgment does not violate the public
policy of the applicable jurisdiction.
|
|
|
Item 4. |
|
Information on the Company |
Overview
Ternium is a leading steel company in Latin America, manufacturing and processing a wide range of
flat and long steel products for customers active in the construction, home appliances, capital
goods, container, food, energy and automotive industries. Ternium has a production capacity of
finished steel products of approximately 10.4 million tons per year, and shipped approximately 8.1
million tons of steel products in 2010. The Company believes that it is a competitive steel
producer due to its proximity to customers and high-quality raw material sources, state-of-the-art
and flexible production facilities and downstream integration into value-added steel products.
Ternium produces and distributes a broad range of finished and semi-finished steel products,
including value-added steel products such as cold-rolled coils and sheets, galvanized and
electrogalvanized sheets, pre-painted sheets, tin plate, welded pipes, hot-rolled pickled and
annealed and tailor-made flat products. Ternium also produces long steel products such as bars and
wire rod.
Ternium primarily sells its flat and long steel products in the regional markets of the Americas.
Ternium provides specialized products and delivery services, mainly to customers in Mexico,
Argentina, Colombia and various Central American countries, through its network of manufacturing
facilities and service centers. We believe that Ternium is the leading supplier of flat steel
products in Mexico and Argentina, a significant supplier of steel products in Colombia and in
various other countries in South and Central America, and a competitive player in the international
steel market for flat and long steel products. Through its network of commercial offices in several
countries in Latin America, the United States and Spain, Ternium maintains an international
presence that allows it to reach customers outside its local markets, achieve improved
effectiveness in the supply of its products and in the procurement of semi-finished steel, and
maintain a fluid commercial relationship with its customers by providing continuous services and
assistance.
In 2010, approximately 57% of Terniums sales were made to North America, 41% to South and Central
America, and 2% to Europe and other markets. In 2010, Terniums net sales were USD7.4 billion,
gross profit was USD1.7 billion, and net income attributable to equity holders was USD622.1
million.
|
A. |
|
History and Development of the Company |
The Company
Our legal and commercial name is Ternium S.A. The Company was organized as a public limited
liability company (societé anonyme) under the laws of the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg on
December 22, 2003. Our Luxembourg office is located at 29, Avenue de la Porte-Neuve
3rd floor, L-2227 Luxembourg, telephone number +352 2668 3152. Our agent for U.S.
federal securities law purposes is Ternium International U.S.A. Corporation, located at 2200
West Loop South, 8th floor, Houston, TX 77027, United States.
Ternium
Terniums origins began in September 1961 with the founding of Propulsora Siderúrgica, or
Propulsora, by San Faustins predecessor in Argentina. Propulsora began its operations as a
producer of cold-rolled coils in December 1969 and in the early 1990s began to evolve through
a series of strategic investments aimed at transforming Propulsora into an integrated steel
producer. In 1993, Propulsora merged with Aceros Parana (a company formed by the Argentine
government in connection with the privatization of Somisa, at that time the main integrated
producer of flat steel in Argentina), Aceros Paranas subsidiary Sidercrom, a tin plate
processing company, and two other steel industry subsidiaries of Propulsora (Aceros Revestidos
and Bernal). After the merger, Propulsora changed its name to Siderar S.A.I.C. San Faustin
held a controlling interest in Siderar, with the remainder being held mainly by Usinas
Siderurgicas de Minas Gerais S/A (a steel company organized under the laws of Brazil)
(Usiminas), certain former employees of Somisa, and the public.
22
In December 1997, Amazonia (a consortium formed by San Faustin, Siderar, Usiminas, Hylsamex
and Sivensa) won the bid in the privatization of 70% of the shares of Sidor, the largest steel
company in the Andean Community, while Venezuela retained the remaining 30%. The continuing
worldwide steel production crisis, the deterioration of the financial markets, the
appreciation of the Venezuelan Bolívar and other adverse factors negatively affected Sidor and
Amazonia, which undertook debt restructurings in 2000 and 2003. In the 2003 restructuring,
Amazonias interest in Sidor was reduced to 59.7%, while Venezuela increased its interest to
40.3%. In addition, Ylopa (an entity formed by San Faustin, Siderar, Tenaris, Usiminas and
Hylsamexs former controlling shareholder) provided financial assistance to Sidor under a
participation account agreement. Subsequently, Venezuela transferred a 19.9% interest in Sidor
to present and former employees of Sidor under the terms of a special employee participation
plan.
As a part of a multiple-step corporate reorganization in 2005, San Faustin reorganized its
investments in flat and long steel manufacturing, processing and distribution businesses by
contributing its controlling interests in Siderar, Sidor (through Amazonia and Ylopa) and
Ternium Internacional to the Company. On August 22, 2005, we acquired, together with Siderar,
an indirect 99.3% interest in the Mexican company Hylsamex and its subsidiaries and the equity
stakes owned by Hylsamexs former controlling shareholder, Alfa, S.A. de C.V., in Amazonia and
Ylopa. We subsequently purchased additional shares of Hylsamex in the open market, subject to
applicable law, thereby increasing our and Siderars direct and indirect interest in Hylsamex
to 99.9%. In 2005, each of Tenaris and Usiminas exchanged its interests in Amazonia, Ylopa
and, in the case of Usiminas, Siderar for shares of the Company, and Sivensa exchanged its
interest in Amazonia for shares of the Company.
On January 11, 2006, the Company launched an initial public offering of 24,844,720 American
Depositary Shares, each representing 10 shares of the Company (each an ADS), in the United
States. In connection with the offering, the Company granted the underwriters of the Companys
initial public offering an option to purchase up to 3,726,708 additional ADSs to cover
over-allotments in the sale of the ADSs. The offering was settled on February 6, 2006.
On December 28, 2006, we acquired an additional 4.85% interest in Siderar from CVRD
Internacional S.A., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Vale, thereby increasing our ownership in
Siderar to 60.93%.
On April 29, 2007, the Company entered into an agreement with Grupo Imsa and Grupo Imsas
controlling shareholders pursuant to which Grupo Imsa came under our control on July 26, 2007.
Under the agreement, the Company, through a wholly owned subsidiary, made a cash tender offer
under applicable Mexican law for all of the issued and outstanding share capital of Grupo
Imsa. Pursuant to the tender offer, we acquired 25,133,856 shares representing 9.3% of the
issued and outstanding capital of Grupo Imsa. Concurrently with the consummation of the tender
offer, on July 26, 2007, all the shares of Grupo Imsa that were not tendered into the tender
offer (including the shares owned by Grupo Imsas majority shareholders), representing 90.7%
of Grupo Imsas issued and outstanding share capital, were redeemed for cash pursuant to a
capital reduction effected at the same price per share. Following this capital reduction, we
became the sole shareholder of Grupo Imsa.
In 2007, Grupo Imsa was renamed Ternium Mexico and, effective March 31, 2008, Hylsamex merged
with and into Ternium Mexico. In connection with this merger, Siderar became a shareholder of
Ternium Mexico with a 28.7% interest.
On
April 29, 2008, the National Assembly of Venezuela passed a resolution declaring that the shares of Sidor, together with all of its assets, were of public and social interest, and
authorizing the Venezuelan government to take any action it deemed appropriate in connection
with any such assets, including expropriation. On May 11, 2008, Decree Law 6058 of the
President of Venezuela regulating the steel production activity in the Guayana region in
Venezuela (the Decree), dated April 30, 2008, was published. The Decree ordered that Sidor
and its subsidiaries and associated companies be transformed into state-owned enterprises
(empresas del Estado), with Venezuela owning not less than 60% of their share capital. On
May 7, 2009, Ternium completed the transfer of its entire 59.7% interest in Sidor to CVG. For
more information on the Sidor nationalization process, see note 29 to our audited consolidated
financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report.
23
On August 25, 2010, Ternium completed the acquisition of a 54% ownership interest in Ferrasa
through a capital contribution in the amount of USD74.5 million. Ferrasa has a 100% ownership
interest in Sidecaldas S.A.S., Figuraciones S.A.S. and Perfilamos del Cauca S.A.S., all of
which are also Colombian companies. Ternium also completed the acquisition of a 54% ownership
interest in Ferrasa Panamá for USD0.5 million. Ferrasa Panamá is a long steel products
processor and distributor based in Panama. Through these investments Ternium is expanding its
business and commercial presence in Colombia, a country that has been experiencing significant
growth, as well as in Central America. For more information on the Ferrasa acquisition, see
note 3 to our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual
report.
On October 4, 2010 Ternium and Nippon Steel Corporation signed a definitive agreement to form
a joint venture in Mexico for the manufacturing and sale of hot-dip galvanized and
galvannealed steel sheets to serve the Mexican automobile market. The joint venture company,
Tenigal, was established in November 2010 with Ternium and Nippon Steel holding 51% and 49%
participations, respectively. Tenigal began work for the construction of a hot-dip galvanizing
plant in the vicinity of Monterrey City, which is expected to commence production of
high-grade and high-quality galvanized and galvannealed automotive steel sheets, including
outer-panel and high-strength qualities, in 2013. For more information on the Tenigal joint
venture, see note 31 to our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in
this annual report.
Our Business Strategy
Our main strategic objective is to enhance shareholder value by strengthening Terniums
position as a low cost producer of steel products, in a manner consistent with minority
shareholders rights, while further consolidating Terniums position as a leading flat and
long steel producer in Latin America and a strong competitor in the Americas with strategic
presence in other major steel markets.
The main elements of this strategy are:
|
Enhance Terniums position as a low cost steel producer. We are focused on improving
utilization levels of our plants, increasing efficiency and further reducing production costs
from levels that we already consider to be among the most competitive in the steel industry
through, among other measures, capital investments and further integration of our facilities; |
|
Pursue strategic growth opportunities. We have a history of strategically growing our
businesses through acquisitions and joint ventures. In addition to strongly pursuing organic
growth, we intend to identify and actively pursue growth-enhancing strategic opportunities to
consolidate Terniums presence in its main markets and expand it to the rest of Latin America,
gain further access to iron ore and other inputs, expand its offerings of value-added
products, increase its steel production, and increase its distribution capabilities. In this
regard, our Ferrasa acquisition in Colombia in 2010 allowed Ternium to expand its business and
commercial presence in a country that is experiencing significant growth; |
|
|
Maximize the benefits arising from Terniums broad distribution network. We intend to
maximize the benefits arising from Terniums broad network of distribution, sales and
marketing services to reach customers in major steel markets with a comprehensive range of
value-added products and services and to continue to expand its customer base and improve its
product mix; |
|
|
Focus on higher margin value-added products. We intend to continue to shift Terniums sales
mix towards higher margin value-added products, such as cold-rolled sheets and coated and
tailor-made products, and services, such as just-in-time delivery and inventory management. In
this regard, the pickling, cold-rolling, annealing and tempering lines planned in the vicinity
of Monterrey City, will allow Ternium to increase its offering of cold-rolled and galvanized
products to meet the demanding requirements of our industrial customers in Mexico; and |
|
|
Implementing Terniums best practices. We believe that the implementation of Terniums
managerial, commercial and production best practices in acquired new businesses should
generate additional benefits and savings. For example, the implementation of Terniums cost
control procedures and performance analysis in Ternium Mexico improved control over its
production variables and led to cost savings. |
24
Our Competitive Strengths
We believe that the following competitive strengths distinguish Ternium from its competitors
and enhance its leading market position:
|
State-of-the-art and flexible production system, low cost producer. The combination of a
portfolio of state-of-the-art, low cost steel production mills, access to diversified sources
of raw materials, including proprietary iron ore mines in Mexico, diversified technology base,
including blast furnace based, mini-mill based and non-integrated based steel processing
facilities, and cost-competitive labor sources makes Ternium a low-cost producer of steel and
a cost-competitive producer of value-added products; |
|
Strong market position and extensive market reach. Ternium has a leading participation in
the market for flat steel products in Mexico and Argentina and is a significant supplier of
steel products in Colombia and in various other countries in South and Central America. The
location of its production facilities gives Ternium favorable access to the most important
regional markets in the Americas, including the North American Free Trade Agreement, or NAFTA,
and Mercado Común del Sur, or Mercosur; and |
|
Experienced and committed management team. Our management team has extensive experience in,
and knowledge of, the steel industry, which enhances Terniums reputation in the global steel
markets. A large percentage of our senior managers have spent their entire careers working
within the steel businesses of San Faustin and its affiliates. Our management team has
substantial experience in increasing productivity and reducing costs, as well as in
identifying, evaluating and pursuing growth opportunities and integrating acquisitions. |
Our Products
The Ternium companies produce mainly finished and semi-finished flat and long steel products
which are sold either directly to steel processors or to end-users, after different
value-adding processes. Flat steel products include slabs (steel in its basic, semi-finished
state), hot-rolled coils and sheets, cold-rolled coils and sheets, tin plate, hot dipped
galvanized and electrogalvanized sheets and pre-painted sheets. Galvanized and pre-painted
sheets can be further processed into a variety of corrugated sheets, trapezoidal sheets and
other tailor-made products to serve Terniums customer requirements. Long steel products
include billets and round bars (steel in its basic, semi-finished state), wire rod, bars and
stirrups.
Flat steel products
Slabs: Slabs are semi-finished steel forms with dimensions suitable for its processing into
hot-rolled flat products. The use of slabs is determined by its dimensions and by its chemical
and metallurgical characteristics.
Hot-rolled flat products: Hot-rolled flat products are used by a variety of industrial
consumers in applications such as the manufacturing of wheels, auto parts, pipes, gas
cylinders and containers. They are also directly used for the construction of buildings,
bridges and railroad cars, and for the chassis of trucks and automobiles. Hot-rolled products
can be supplied as coils or as sheets cut to a specific length. These products also serve as
inputs for the production of cold-rolled products.
Cold-rolled products: Cold-rolled products are applied mainly to the automotive, home
appliance and capital goods industries, as well as to galvanizers, drummers, distributors and
service centers. Cold-rolled coils are sold as coils or cut into sheets or blanks to meet
customers needs. These products also serve as inputs for the production of coated products.
Tin plate and tin free: Given its resistance to corrosion and its mechanical and chemical
characteristics, tin plate is mainly sold to the packaging industry for food canning, sprays
and paint containers. Tin plate and tin free are produced by coating cold-rolled coils with a
layer of tin and thin chrome, respectively, that is attached by an electroplating continuous
process.
25
Hot dipped galvanized and pre-painted sheets: Hot dipped galvanized sheets are produced by
adding a layer of zinc to cold-rolled coils, which are afterwards cut into sheets. Galvanized
sheets can also be pre-painted, resulting in a product that is mainly sold to the construction
industry for building coverings, manufacturing of ceiling systems, panels, air conditioning
ducts and several other uses. Ternium also offers, under the trademark Zintroalum in Mexico
and Cincalum in Argentina, a distinctive type of galvanized product with coating composition
that contains approximately 55% aluminum and 44% zinc to improve product performance for
construction industry, including rural, industrial and marine sites.
Electrogalvanized and pre-painted sheets: Electro-galvanized and pre-painted sheets are sold
mainly to customers in the automotive and home appliance industries. Electro-galvanized and
pre-painted sheets are produced from cold-rolled coils by adding a layer of zinc that is
attached by an electroplating continuous process, in one or both sides. The electro-galvanized
coils are subsequently cut and sold either as sheets or are further processed with a color
coating to produce pre-painted sheets. Electro-galvanization provides products with a longer
useful life and more resistance to corrosion compared to other coating methods.
Steel pipes and tubular products: Products included are tubes for general use, structural
tubes, tubes for mechanical applications, conduction tubes, conduction electrical tubes and
oil tubes. These products, uncoated or galvanized, have applications in several sectors
including home accessories, furniture, scaffolding, automotive, bicycles, hospital equipment,
posts for wire mesh garden and poultry tools, handrails, guard-rails, agricultural machinery,
industrial equipment, conduction of water, air, gas, oil, high-pressure liquids and special
fluids and internal building electrical installations.
Beams: Obtained by roll forming of steel strips, include C and Z section steel profiles
(purlings) and tubular section beams, these products have applications in window frames,
stilts, mainstays, crossbeams, building structures, supports, guides and crossbars for
installing windows, doors, frames and boards.
Roll formed products: Products included are insultated panels, roofing and cladding, roof
tiles and steel decks. Obtained from the mechanical transformation of flat steel, uncoated,
galvanized or pre-painted, these products are used mainly in the construction industry in
warehouses, commercial and industrial refrigeration installations, grain storage, poultry and
porcine confinement facilities, roofing and side walls for buildings, and terraces and
mezzanine floorings.
Long steel products
Steel billets: Billets are semi-finished steel forms with dimensions suitable for its
processing into hot-rolled long steel products such as wire rod, bars and other shapes.
Steel round bars: Round bars are semi-finished steel forms with dimensions suitable for its
processing into hot-rolled steel products such as seamless tubes.
Wire rod: Rods are round, thin, semi-finished steel products that are rolled from a billet and
coiled for further processing. Rods are commonly drawn into wire products or used to make
bolts and nails. Wire rod can be produced in different qualities according to customers
demands.
Bars: Bars are long steel products that are rolled from billets. Two of the most common types
of bars produced are merchant bars and reinforcing bars (rebar). Merchant bars include
specific shape features such as rounds, flats, angles,
squares and channels that are used by customers to manufacture a wide variety of products such
as furniture, stair railings and farm equipment. Rebar is used to strengthen concrete
highways, bridges and buildings.
Stirrups: Obtained from the mechanical transformation of rebars, stirrups are used in the
construction industry in cement-based structures.
Other products
Pre-engineered metal building systems: These products are obtained from the mechanical
transformation of flat steel. The steel construction systems are destined to low-rise
non-residential buildings. Include frames, secondary steel members, roofs and walls panels, as
well as finishing and accessories.
26
Pig iron: A semifinished product obtained in the blast furnace, it is mostly used as metallic
charge in the steel shop for the production of crude steel and it is also marketed to other
steel producers and to manufactures of iron-based cast products.
Iron ore pellets: A raw material for the production of steel, it is mostly used as metallic
charge (after being reduced in DRI modules or blast furnaces) in the steel shop for the
production of crude steel and it is also marketed to other steel producers.
Within each of the basic product categories there is a range of different items of varying
qualities and prices that are produced either to meet the particular requirements of end users
or sold as commodity items.
Production Facilities and Processes
Ternium has steel production facilities, service centers and distribution centers, or DCs, in
North, Central and South America and iron ore mining operations in North America.
Terniums aggregate production capacity of steel products as of December 31, 2010, calculated
based on management estimates of standard productivity, product mix allocations, the maximum
number of possible working shifts and a continued flow of supplies to the production process,
was approximately 10.4 million tons, of which 8.7 million tons correspond to flat steel
products and 1.7 million tons correspond to long steel products, and of which 7.2 million tons
correspond to facilities located in North America and 3.2 million tons correspond to
facilities located in South and Central America.
Steel production facilities, service centers and distribution centers
The assets described in this section are owned by Terniums operating subsidiaries. The
following table provides an overview, by type of asset, of Terniums production capacity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capacity (thousand tons per year) 1 |
|
Production asset |
|
Quantity |
|
|
Mexico |
|
|
Argentina |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
Coke Plant |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,030 |
|
Sinter Plant |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,490 |
|
Direct Reduced Iron Plant |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2,690 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,690 |
|
Blast Furnace |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,890 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,890 |
|
Electric Arc Furnace |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
3,770 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
3,930 |
|
Basic Oxygen Furnace |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
Thin Slab Continuous Caster |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,050 |
|
Slab Continuous Caster |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,880 |
|
Billet Continuous Caster |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1,660 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
1,810 |
|
Slab Rolling Mill |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
5,700 |
|
|
|
2,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,490 |
|
Skin Pass Mill |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
2,130 |
|
|
|
940 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,070 |
|
Billet Rolling Mill |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
1,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
1,240 |
|
Pickling Line |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
3,500 |
|
|
|
1,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,290 |
|
Cold-Rolling Mill (Tandem or Reversing) |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
2,540 |
|
|
|
1,770 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,310 |
|
Electrolytic Cleaning |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
1,220 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,420 |
|
Annealing Line |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
1,240 |
|
|
|
1,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,480 |
|
Temper Mill |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
1,320 |
|
|
|
1,770 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,090 |
|
Tension-Leveling / Inspection Line |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
800 |
|
|
|
980 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,780 |
|
Electro-tin plating line |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160 |
|
Hot Dip Galvanizing Line |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
1,430 |
|
|
|
550 |
|
|
|
390 |
|
|
|
2,370 |
|
Electro-galvanizing Line |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120 |
|
Color Coating Line |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
660 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
950 |
|
Slitter |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
1,960 |
|
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
2,690 |
|
Cut to length |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
550 |
|
|
|
860 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
1,540 |
|
Roll forming Line |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
490 |
|
|
|
410 |
|
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
1,180 |
|
Panel Line |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80 |
|
Profile Line |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
270 |
|
Tube Line |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
750 |
|
Structural beams Lines |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
Wire drawing Lines |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
Wire Mesh Lines |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
Rebar Processing Lines2 |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
In this annual report annual production capacity is calculated based on
management estimates of standard productivity, product mix allocations, the maximum
number of possible working shifts and a continued flow of supplies to the production
process. |
|
2 |
|
Include shears, straighteners, stirrup benders and shaping centers. |
27
North America Region. Ternium has twelve steel production and/or processing units in this
region, consisting of three integrated steel-making plants (two of which produce long steel
products and one of which produces flat steel products and includes two steel service
centers), five downstream flat steel processing plants, combining hot-rolling, cold-rolling
and/or coating facilities (two of which include steel service centers), and four steel service
centers. In addition, Ternium has ten distribution centers in this region, aimed at serving
customers mainly in the construction sector.
The following table sets forth key items of information regarding Terniums principal
production locations and production units:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type of Plant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service |
|
Distribution |
|
|
|
|
|
Unit |
|
Country |
|
Integrated |
|
Downstream |
|
Center |
|
Center |
|
Location |
|
|
Products |
Guerrero1 |
|
Mexico |
|
X |
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
San Nicolás d.l.G., Nuevo León |
|
Flat |
Norte2 |
|
Mexico |
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apodaca, Nuevo León |
|
Long |
Puebla3 |
|
Mexico |
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puebla, Puebla |
|
Long |
Juventud4 |
|
Mexico |
|
|
|
X |
|
X |
|
|
|
San Nicolás d.l.G., Nuevo León |
|
Flat |
Churubusco5 |
|
Mexico |
|
|
|
X |
|
X |
|
|
|
Monterrey, Nuevo León |
|
Flat |
Monclova6 |
|
Mexico |
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
Monclova, Coahuila |
|
Flat |
Universidad7 |
|
Mexico |
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
San Nicolás d.l.G., Nuevo León |
|
Flat |
Apodaca Industrial8 |
|
Mexico |
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
Apodaca, Nuevo León |
|
Flat |
Apodaca Comercial9 |
|
Mexico |
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
Apodaca, Nuevo León |
|
Flat |
Varco-Pruden10 |
|
Mexico |
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
Ciénaga de Flores, Nuevo León |
|
Metal buildings |
San Luis11 |
|
Mexico |
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
San Luis, San Luis Potosí |
|
Flat |
DC Chihuahua |
|
Mexico |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
Chihuahua, Chihuahua |
|
Flat |
DC BC |
|
Mexico |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
Tijuana, Baja California |
|
Flat |
DC MTY |
|
Mexico |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
Monterrey, Nuevo León |
|
Flat |
DC Puebla |
|
Mexico |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
Puebla, Puebla |
|
Flat |
DC Guadalajara |
|
Mexico |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
Guadalajara, Jalisco |
|
Flat |
DC Mexico |
|
Mexico |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
Naucalpan, Estado De México |
|
Flat |
DC Culiacán |
|
Mexico |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
Culiacán, Sinaloa |
|
Flat |
DC Veracruz |
|
Mexico |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
Veracruz, Veracruz |
|
Flat |
DC Mérida |
|
Mexico |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
Mérida, Yucatán |
|
Flat |
DC Tuxtla |
|
Mexico |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
Tuxtla Gtz, Chiapas |
|
Flat |
Shreveport12 |
|
USA |
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
Shreveport, Louisiana |
|
Flat |
28
|
|
|
1 |
|
The Guerrero unit, located in the metropolitan area of Monterrey, Nuevo León,
Mexico, produces hot-rolled and cold-rolled coils for the industrial, construction and
home appliance sectors and for further processing in other Ternium Mexicos units. It
also produces slitted and cut-to-length products for the industrial sector, and profiles
and tubes for the industrial and construction sectors. This unit includes two steel
service centers, a slab-rolling mill, and an integrated facility based on direct reduced
iron, mini-mill steelmaking and thin-slab casting/rolling mill technologies that uses
iron ore pellets and steel scrap as main raw materials. The facility sources all of the
iron ore from Ternium Mexicos mining operations and the electricity and natural gas from
the Mexican grid. In addition, the facility sources its net requirements of slabs from
Mexican and international producers. Terniums procurement policy for these products is
described in greater depth in Item 4. Information on the CompanyB. Business Overview.
Raw Materials, Energy and Other Inputs. |
|
2 |
|
The Norte unit in Nuevo León, Mexico, produces billets and rebar for the
construction industry. It is an integrated facility based on mini-mill steelmaking
technology that uses steel scrap as its main raw material. The facility sources
electricity from the Mexican grid. Terniums procurement policy for these products is
described in greater depth in Item 4. Information on the CompanyB. Business Overview.
Raw Materials, Energy and Other Inputs. |
|
3 |
|
The Puebla unit in Puebla, Mexico, produces rebar and wire rod mainly for the
construction and industrial sectors, including high-carbon, low-carbon and micro-alloyed
wire rod. It is an integrated facility based on direct reduced iron and mini-mill
steelmaking technologies that uses iron ore pellets and steel scrap as main raw
materials. The facility sources all of the iron ore from Ternium Mexicos mining
operations and the electricity and natural gas from the Mexican grid. Terniums
procurement policy for these products is described in greater depth in Item 4.
Information on the CompanyB. Business Overview. Raw Materials, Energy and Other
Inputs. |
|
4 |
|
The Juventud unit in Nuevo León, Mexico, produces galvanized and color coated
coils for the construction, home appliance and other industries and has a steel service
center that produces slitted and roll-formed products, panels and tubes for the
construction and industrial sectors. This plant processes hot-rolled and cold-rolled
coils received from Ternium Mexicos units in Nuevo León. |
|
5 |
|
The Churubusco unit in Nuevo León, Mexico, produces hot-rolled and cold-rolled
coils for industrial, construction and home appliance sectors and for further processing
in other Ternium Mexicos units. It also produces slitted and cut-to-length products for
the industrial sector. The facility sources its requirements of slabs from other Mexican
producers and from the international markets. Terniums procurement policy for slabs is
described in greater depth in Item 4. Information on the CompanyB. Business Overview.
Raw Materials, Energy and Other Inputs. |
|
6 |
|
The Monclova unit in Coahuila, Mexico, produces galvanized and color coated
sheets for the home appliance industry. This plant procceses cold-rolled coils mainly
received from Ternium Mexicos units in Nuevo León. |
|
7 |
|
The Universidad unit in Nuevo León, Mexico, located across the street from the
Guerrero unit, produces galvanized and color coated coils for the construction, home
appliance and industrial sectors. This plant, which also has a cold-rolling mill,
processes hot-rolled coils received from Ternium Mexicos units in Nuevo León. |
|
8 |
|
The Apodaca Industrial unit in Nuevo León, Mexico, is a steel service center
that produces slitted and cut-to-length products for industrial customers. This plant
processes coated coils mainly received from Ternium Mexicos units in Nuevo León. |
|
9 |
|
The Apodaca Comercial unit in Nuevo León, Mexico, is a steel service center that
produces slitted and roll-formed products, profiles and tubes for the construction
industry. This plant processes coated coils mainly received from Ternium Mexicos units
in Nuevo León. |
|
10 |
|
The Varco-Pruden unit in Nuevo León, Mexico, produces metal buildings systems
for commercial construction. This plant processes heavy plates procured from the local
and international markets and coils received from Ternium Mexicos units in Nuevo León. |
|
11 |
|
The San Luis unit in San Luis Potosí, Mexico, is a steel service center that
produces slitted and cut-to-length products for the home appliance and other industries.
This plant processes coated coils received from Ternium Mexicos units in Nuevo León. |
|
12 |
|
The Shreveport unit in Lousiana, US, produces galvanized and color coated
sheets. It processes cold-rolled coils procured in the international markets. |
29
On October 4, 2010 Ternium and Nippon Steel Corporation signed a definitive agreement to form
a joint venture in Mexico for the manufacturing and sale of hot-dip galvanized and
galvannealed steel sheets to serve the Mexican automobile market. The joint venture company,
Tenigal, was established in November 2010 with Ternium and Nippon Steel holding 51% and 49%
participations, respectively. Tenigal began work for the construction of a hot-dip galvanizing
plant in the vicinity of Monterrey City (equivalent to the state-of-the art equipment now in
operation at Nippon Steels steelworks in Japan) with a production capacity of 400,000 metric
tons per year. The plant is expected to commence production of high-grade and high-quality
galvanized and galvannealed automotive steel sheets, including outer-panel and high-strength
qualities, in 2013. Tenigal is expected to serve the requirements of the growing automotive
industry in Mexico, including those of the Japanese car makers. In addition, Ternium Mexico
plans to construct new pickling, cold-rolling, annealing and tempering lines at the same site.
Part of the output from these lines will be used to supply the Tenigal plant. For more
information on the Tenigal joint venture, see note 31 to our audited consolidated financial
statements included elsewhere in this annual report.
South and Central America Region. Ternium has twenty-four steel production and/or processing
units in this region, consisting of two integrated steel-making plant (one of which produces
flat steel products and one of which produces long steel products), five downstream flat steel
processing plants, comprising cold-rolling, coating or tube making facilities (four of which
include steel service centers), and seventeen steel service centers. In addition, Ternium has
four steel retail distribution centers in this region, aimed at serving customers mainly in
the construction sector.
The following table set forth key items of information regarding Terniums principal
production locations and production units:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type of Plant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service |
|
Distribution |
|
|
|
|
Unit |
|
Country |
|
Integrated |
|
Downstream |
|
Center |
|
Center |
|
Location |
|
Products |
San Nicolás13
|
|
Argentina
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ramallo, Buenos Aires
|
|
Flat |
Canning14
|
|
Argentina
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
Canning, Buenos Aires
|
|
Flat |
Haedo14
|
|
Argentina
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
Haedo, Buenos Aires
|
|
Flat |
Florencio Varela15
|
|
Argentina
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
Florencio Varela, Buenos Aires
|
|
Flat |
Ensenada16
|
|
Argentina
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ensenada, Buenos Aires
|
|
Flat |
Rosario17
|
|
Argentina
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
Rosario, Santa Fe
|
|
Flat |
San Luis17
|
|
Argentina
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
San Luis, San Luis
|
|
Flat |
Serviacero III18
|
|
Argentina
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
Ramallo, Buenos Aires
|
|
Flat |
Sidercrom19
|
|
Argentina
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
Ramallo, Buenos Aires
|
|
Flat |
Manizales Acasa20
|
|
Colombia
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manizales, Caldas
|
|
Long |
Barranquilla21
|
|
Colombia
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
Malambo, Atlántico
|
|
Flat |
Itaguí22
|
|
Colombia
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
Itaguí, Antioquía
|
|
Long |
Calí Perfilamos23
|
|
Colombia
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
Puerto Tejada, Cauca
|
|
Flat |
Medellín24
|
|
Colombia
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
Medellín, Antioquía
|
|
Flat and long |
Bogotá24
|
|
Colombia
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
Bogotá, Cundinamarca
|
|
Flat and long |
Calí Ferrasa24
|
|
Colombia
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
Calí, Valle del Cauca
|
|
Flat and long |
Montería24
|
|
Colombia
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
Montería, Córdoba
|
|
Flat and long |
Manizales Ferrasa24
|
|
Colombia
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
Manizales, Caldas
|
|
Flat and long |
Villa Nueva25
|
|
Guatemala
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
Villa Nueva, Guatemala
|
|
Flat |
DC Norte
|
|
Guatemala
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
Guatemala, Guatemala
|
|
Flat |
DC Occidente
|
|
Guatemala
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
Mazatenango, Suchitepéquez
|
|
Flat |
Tegucigalpa26
|
|
Honduras
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
San Pedro Sula, Cortés
|
|
Flat |
DC Tegucigalpa
|
|
Honduras
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
Tegucigalpa, Distrito Central
|
|
Flat |
San Salvador26
|
|
El Salvador
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
San Salvador, San Salvador
|
|
Flat |
DC San Miguel
|
|
El Salvador
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
San Miguel, San Miguel
|
|
Flat |
Managua26
|
|
Nicaragua
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
Managua, Managua
|
|
Flat |
Heredia27
|
|
Costa Rica
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
Heredia, Heredia
|
|
Flat |
Panamá24
|
|
Panama
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
Panama, Panama
|
|
Long |
30
|
|
|
13 |
|
The San Nicolás unit in the Province of Buenos Aires, Argentina, produces
hot-rolled, cold-rolled and tinplate coils for the construction, industrial and packaging
sectors and for further processing in other Siderars units. San Nicolás includes an
integrated facility based on blast furnace and basic oxygen furnace technologies,
supplemented with a sinter plant, coking batteries, a by-product plant and a power plant.
It uses metallurgical coal and iron ore lumps, pellets and fines as main raw materials.
The facility sources all of its coal and iron ore needs from the international markets,
shipped to its own port on the banks of the Paraná river. It sources the natural gas from
the Argentine grid, produces most of its electricity needs in its own power plant and
sources its net requirements of electricity from the Argentine grid. Terniums
procurement policy for these products is described in greater depth in Item 4.
Information on the CompanyB. Business Overview. Raw Materials, Energy and Other
Inputs. |
|
14 |
|
The Canning and Haedo units in the Province of Buenos Aires, Argentina, produce
galvanized sheets, slitted and roll-formed products and profiles for the construction and
home appliance sectors. In addition, the Canning facility produces color coated sheets
for such markets. Both plants process cold-rolled coils received from Siderars San
Nicolás and Ensenada units. |
|
15 |
|
The Florencio Varela unit in the Province of Buenos Aires, Argentina, produces
electro-galvanized sheets, blanks and slitted products for the automotive, construction
and other industries. This plant processes cold-rolled coils received from Siderars San
Nicolás and Ensenada units. |
|
16 |
|
The Ensenada unit in the Province of Buenos Aires, Argentina, produces
cold-rolled coils for the construction and industrial sectors and for further processing
in Siderars own facilities. This plant processes hot-rolled coils received from
Siderars San Nicolás unit. |
|
17 |
|
The Rosario unit in the Province of Santa Fe, Argentina, and the San Luis unit
in the Province of San Luis, Argentina, are steel service centers that produce tubes for
the construction industry. These plants process hot-rolled coils received from Siderars
San Nicolás unit. |
|
18 |
|
The Serviacero III unit in the Province of Buenos Aires, Argentina, is a steel
service center that produces cut-to-length products for the construction and industrial
sectors. This plant processes hot-rolled coils received from Siderars San Nicolás unit. |
|
19 |
|
The Sidercrom unit in the Province of Buenos Aires, Argentina, is a steel
service center that produces cut-to-length and slitted products for the packaging sector.
This plant processes tinplate coils received from Siderars San Nicolás unit. |
|
20 |
|
The Manizales Acasa unit in Caldas, Colombia, produces billets and rebar for the
construction industry. It is an integrated facility based on mini-mill steelmaking
technology that uses steel scrap as its main raw material. The facility sources all of its scrap and electricity needs from local suppliers. Terniums
procurement policy for these products is described in greater depth in Item 4. Information
on the CompanyB. Business OverviewRaw Materials, Energy and Other Inputs. |
|
21 |
|
The Barranquilla unit in Atlántico, Colombia, is a steel service center that
produces slitted, cut-to-length, drawn wire, wire mesh and customized rebar-based
products for the construction industry. This plant processes wire rod purchased in the
international market and rebar received from Ferrasas Manizales unit and rebar purchased
in the international markets. Hot-rolled and cold-rolled coils are received mainly from
Ternium Mexicos units in Nuevo León. |
31
|
|
|
22 |
|
The Itaguaí unit in Antioquía, Colombia, is a steel service center that produces
drawn wire, wire mesh and customized rebar-based products for the construction industry.
This plant processes wire rod purchased in the international markets and rebar received
from Ferrasas Manizales unit and rebar purchased in the international markets. |
|
23 |
|
The Calí Perfilamos unit in Cauca, Colombia, is a steel service center that
produces profiles, tubes and structural beams for the construction industry. This plant
processes hot-rolled and cold-rolled coils received mainly from Ternium Mexicos units in
Nuevo León and purchased in the international markets. |
|
24 |
|
The Medellín unit in Antioquía, Colombia, the Bogotá unit in Cundinamarca,
Colombia, the Calí Ferrasa unit in Valle del Cauca, Colombia, the Montería unit in
Córdoba, Colombia, the Manizales Ferrasa unit in Caldas, Colombia and the Panamá unit in
Panama, Panama, are steel services centers that produce customized rebar-based products
for the construction industry. These plants process rebar received
from Ferrasas
Manizales unit and rebar purchased in the international markets. |
|
25 |
|
The Villa Nueva unit in Guatemala, Guatemala, produces galvanized sheets for the
construction industry and for further processing in other Ternium Mexicos units in
Central America. It also has a steel service center that produces slitted, roll-formed
and cut-to-length products, and profiles for the construction industry. This plant
processes hot-rolled, cold-rolled and coated coils received from Ternium Mexicos units
in the Nuevo León area and from the international markets. |
|
26 |
|
The Tegucigalpa unit in Cortés, Honduras, the San Salvador unit in San Salvador,
El Salvador, and the Managua unit in Managua, Nicaragua, are steel service centers that
produce roll-formed products for the construction industry. These plants process coated
coils received mainly from Ternium Mexicos Villa Nueva unit. |
|
27 |
|
The Heredia unit in Heredia, Costa Rica, is a steel service center that produces
roll-formed products and profiles for the construction industry. This plant processes
hot-rolled, cold-rolled and coated coils received from Ternium Mexicos units in Nuevo
León and from the Villa Nueva unit. |
Iron ore mining facilities
Ternium has a 100% interest in Las Encinas S.A. de C.V. (Las Encinas) and a 50% interest in
Consorcio Minero Benito Juárez Peña Colorada, S.A. de C.V (Peña Colorada). The following
table provides an overview, by type of asset, of Terniums production capacity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capacity (thousands of tons per year) |
|
Production asset |
|
Quantity |
|
|
Las Encinas |
|
|
Peña Colorada |
|
|
Total |
|
Crushing Plant |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
5,300 |
|
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
|
14,300 |
|
Beneficiation Plant |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
4,400 |
|
|
|
6,400 |
|
Pelletizing Line |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1,900 |
|
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
|
5,900 |
|
Las Encinas operates the Aquila open pit mine located in Michoacán, Mexico, and the El Encino
underground mine located in Jalisco, Mexico. Las Encinas produces iron ore pellets. The
facilities include crushing and beneficiation plants located close to the mines and
beneficiation and pelletizing plants located near Alzada in Colima, Mexico, approximately 160
kilometers from Aquila. The iron ore pellets are shipped by rail to Ternium Mexicos
integrated facilities.
Peña Colorada operates the Minatitlán open pit mine located in Colima, Mexico. Peña Colorada
produces iron ore pellets and magnetite concentrate. The facilities include crushing and
beneficiation plants located close to the mine, near Minatitlán, and a pelletizing plant,
including two pelletizing lines, located near the Manzanillo Port in the Pacific coast in
Colima, Mexico, 50 kilometers from Minatitlán. Ternium and ArcelorMittal each own 50% of Peña
Colorada. Under the existing arrangements, Peña Colorada is required to sell half of the
mines production to each of Ternium and ArcelorMittal. See Item 4. Information on the
CompanyB. Business OverviewRaw Materials, Energy and Other InputsMexicoIron Ore. Both
iron ore pellets and magnetite concentrates are shipped by rail or from the Manzanillo Port to
Terniums facilities, to ArcelorMittals facilities and abroad.
32
Production process
Ternium specializes in manufacturing and processing finished flat and long steel products.
Terniums facilities use different technologies and have different levels of integration. The
basic inputs for steel production are iron ore and energy. Iron ore is used in three different
formats: fines and lumps, which are purchased in the marketplace, and pellets, which are
partly purchased in the marketplace and partly produced by Ternium. Terniums steel production
processes consume energy mainly in the form of natural gas, coal and electricity.
Iron ore extraction and processing. The iron ore pellet production process begins with the
sourcing of iron ore from Terniums own mines in Mexico. The ore can be extracted from open
pit or underground mines. Extraction consists of removing waste and ore from the surface with
explosives, loading and transporting it by truck to the crushing facilities where it is
resized to a specified size.
After crushing, the ore goes through several grinding and concentration stages. Grinding
reduces the size and shape of the ore while concentration, through magnetic drums, separates
the iron from the sterile material to obtain an iron ore concentrate with high iron content.
This process is carried out using water as an auxiliary element. Excess water is afterwards
eliminated through a filtering process, leaving only the necessary humidity for the formation
of pellets using pelletizing disks. Pellets are separated according to their size and are then
hardened in ovens and shipped to the steel producing facilities.
Steel production. Ternium produces semi-finished steel in the form of thin slabs, slabs,
billets and round bars through the electric arc furnace and the blast furnace methods. Under
the electric arc furnace method, which is used in Mexico and Colombia, the iron metal charge
is heated with other elements to obtain molten steel. The molten steel is then cast using the
continuous casting method into billets and thin slabs. The iron metal charge in the Norte and
Manizales plants is steel scrap, and the iron metal charge in the Monterrey and Puebla Plants
is a mix of direct reduced iron (DRI) and steel scrap. The direct reduced iron (DRI) results
from the convertion of pellets in the DRI modules. One of Monterreys DRI plants includes the
latest DRI HYL ® technological advances, such as Hytemp ®, which permits the hot discharge of
the DRI to the electric arc furnace generating significant energy savings and improving
productivity.
Under the blast furnace method, which is used in Argentina, iron ore pellets, lumps, sinter (a
mixture of iron ore fines and limestone produced in our sinter plant) and coke (a solid
residue obtained from the distillation of coal produced in our coking batteries) are mixed in
the blast furnaces in a process that melts and reduces the iron ore, obtaining pig iron. The
molten pig iron is then mixed with steel scrap and other products in a basic oxygen furnace
through a process that removes impurities from the pig iron by injecting pure oxygen at high
pressure into the molten metal, burning-off carbon and other elements. The molten steel is
then cast using the continuous casting method into slabs.
Steel processing. Semi-finished steel is then processed into finished products using
hot-rolling, cold-rolling, coating, tubing, paneling, slitting and cut-to-length facilities
among other processes. Ternium purchases semi-finished steel in the marketplace in the form of
slabs, as its slabs processing capacity in Mexico is higher than its slabs production capacity
in the country. It may purchase hot-rolled and cold-rolled coils as well for further
processing in its lines.
Slabs and billets are processed in the hot-rolling mills in Mexico, Argentina and Colombia to
obtain hot-rolled products using different technologies. In the case of flat products,
hot-rolled coils are obtained from thin or conventional slabs. Thin slab hot-rolling, a
technology Ternium uses only in Mexico, requires less energy than conventional slab
hot-rolling, as it does not require a roughing section at the mill and does not need to be
reheated from room temperature to reach rolling temperature. In the production of long
products, which is carried out in Mexico and Colombia, billets are reheated and taken to
rolling temperature. The softened steel is processed in the rolling trains
to obtain wire rods and rebars as finished long products and, depending on its final use,
rebars can be further processed into stirrups and other customized shapes in our service
centers in Colombia and Panama.
Depending on its final use, the hot-rolled coils are then tempered and/or pickled, both in
Mexico and Argentina, before being sent for sale as coils or cut into steel sheets.
Alternatively, the hot-rolled coils may be sent to a cold-rolling mill where they are put
under a deformation process at room temperature to reduce their thickness and obtain
cold-rolled coils. Cold-rolled coils can be sold in crude form to the market (full hard) or
processed in the reheating ovens, annealing bays and tempers lines to modify their metallurgic
and physical characteristics. The tempered products can be sold as coils or sheets or further
processed by adding coatings.
33
Cold-rolled coils can be further processed into tin plate at Siderars facility in Argentina
(by adding a thin layer of tin), into galvanized or electro galvanized sheets at several of
Terniums facilities in Mexico, United States and Guatemala and at Siderars facility in
Argentina (by adding a thin layer of zinc to the products through different processes) or into
pre-painted products. Some of these products can be further processed into slit, cut-to-length
and tailor-made products according to customers needs at Terniums service centers, which are
located in several countries. In addition, coated, cold-rolled and hot-rolled coils can be
further processed into tubular products, such as welded pipes, insulated panels and
architectural panels, among other products.
Sales and Marketing
Net Sales
Ternium primarily sells its steel products in the regional markets of North America and
Central and South America, where it can leverage its strategically located manufacturing
facilities to provide specialized products, delivery services to its clients and reduced
freight costs.
Our total net sales amounted to USD7.4 billion in 2010, USD5.0 billion in 2009 and USD8.5
billion in 2008. For further information on our net sales see Item 5. Operating and Financial
Review and ProspectsA. Results of Operations.
The following table shows Terniums total consolidated net sales by product and geographical
region for the years indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31, |
|
In millions of U.S. dollars |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Flat Steel Product Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America |
|
|
3,464.9 |
|
|
|
2,371.9 |
|
|
|
4,294.7 |
|
South and Central America |
|
|
2,886.2 |
|
|
|
1,717.1 |
|
|
|
2,782.5 |
|
Europe and Other |
|
|
25.3 |
|
|
|
161.0 |
|
|
|
47.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Flat Steel Products Sales |
|
|
6,376.4 |
|
|
|
4,250.0 |
|
|
|
7,124.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long Steel Product Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America |
|
|
640.7 |
|
|
|
512.0 |
|
|
|
791.8 |
|
South and Central America |
|
|
163.9 |
|
|
|
57.3 |
|
|
|
274.2 |
|
Europe and Other |
|
|
28.6 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Long Steel Product Sales |
|
|
833.1 |
|
|
|
572.9 |
|
|
|
1,075.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Other Sales (1) |
|
|
172.5 |
|
|
|
136.1 |
|
|
|
265.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Sales |
|
|
7,382.0 |
|
|
|
4,959.0 |
|
|
|
8,464.9 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The item Other Sales primarily includes iron ore, pig iron and pre-engineered metal
buildings. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands of tons |
|
For the year ended December 31, |
|
(unaudited) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Flat Steel Product Sales Volume |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America |
|
|
3,852.1 |
|
|
|
3,114.5 |
|
|
|
3,666.1 |
|
South and Central America |
|
|
2,877.0 |
|
|
|
1,903.6 |
|
|
|
2,604.2 |
|
Europe and Other |
|
|
42.6 |
|
|
|
287.0 |
|
|
|
55.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Flat Steel Product Sales Volume |
|
|
6,771.7 |
|
|
|
5,305.2 |
|
|
|
6,325.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long Steel Product Sales Volume |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America |
|
|
974.2 |
|
|
|
931.2 |
|
|
|
901.3 |
|
South and Central America |
|
|
258.7 |
|
|
|
118.4 |
|
|
|
302.5 |
|
Europe and Other |
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
13.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Long Steel Product Sales Volume |
|
|
1,282.9 |
|
|
|
1,055.6 |
|
|
|
1,217.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Sales Volume (1) |
|
|
8,054.6 |
|
|
|
6,360.8 |
|
|
|
7,542.7 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Total Sales Volume does not include the tons of Other sales. |
34
North America Region
Sales to customers in the North America Region accounted for 57.0% of Terniums consolidated
sales during 2010, 60.0% during 2009 and 61.8% during 2008. See Item 5. Operating and
Financial Review and ProspectsA. Results of OperationsFiscal Year Ended December 31, 2010
compared to Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2009Net Sales and Fiscal Year Ended December
31, 2009 compared to Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2008Net Sales.
Terniums largest markets in the North America Region are Mexico and the United States.
Most of Terniums Mexican customers are located near its plants. Flat steel non-coated
products are mainly sold in Mexico to construction companies, industrial customers in the
packaging, electric motors and service center industries, and distributors and auto parts
manufacturers. The principal segments in the Mexican coated steel market are construction,
manufacturing (air conditioning, lamps and furniture), appliances and auto parts. Ternium
generally serves industrial customers, who require high-quality specifications, as well as
commercial customers through service centers and warehouses. Long steel rebar and wire rod
markets in Mexico are generally characterized by a large number of orders of small volume,
and competition is largely based on price. The customer base for bar and rod products in
Mexico consists primarily of independent dealers and distributors, who in turn retail the
products to their customers in the construction industry. Ternium markets its tubular
products mainly through Mexican independent distributors, and the balance is sold directly to
industrial customers.
Customers in the United States are served directly through the Shreveport plant and through
Ternium Internacionals Houston commercial office and distribution center, which manage
transport and logistics issues and provide local services and assistance. The Gulf Coast and
a large portion of the West Coast, in particular, are regions in which our Mexican facilities
have distribution advantages. Our main markets in the United States are the construction
industry and the energy related sectors.
South and Central America Region
Sales to customers in the South and Central America Region accounted for 41.4% of Terniums
consolidated sales during 2010, 35.9% during 2009 and 36.7% during 2008. See Item 5.
Operating and Financial Review and ProspectsA. Results of OperationsFiscal Year Ended
December 31, 2010 compared to Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2009Net Sales and Fiscal
Year Ended December 31, 2009 compared to Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2008Net Sales.
Terniums sales are oriented toward the construction and agriculture sectors, the automotive
industry, the packaging sector (for food, paints, sprays and petrochemicals), the tube and
pipe sector (related to liquids and gas transportation and distribution networks), the
capital goods sector and the home appliances sector.
The customer base in South and Central America consists primarily of independent small- and
medium-sized companies and distributors, which in turn process or retail products to their
customers in different market sectors. In addition, Ternium serves large industrial
customers, such as the automotive industry, that require customized products that Ternium can
produce through its service centers and finishing facilities.
Terniums principal customers in the region are
located near Siderars plants in Argentina and Terniums plants in Colombia and
Central America. We also sell to customers in other South
American countries, including Brazil, Bolivia, Chile, Ecuador, Paraguay, Peru and Uruguay.
35
Europe and Other
Sales to customers in Europe and other regions, which are generally made on a spot basis,
accounted for 1.6% of Terniums consolidated sales during 2010, 4.0% during 2009 and 1.5%
during 2008. See Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and ProspectsA. Results of
OperationsFiscal Year Ended December 31, 2010 compared to Fiscal Year Ended December 31,
2009Net Sales and Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2009 compared to Fiscal Year Ended
December 31, 2008Net Sales.
Terniums sales in Europe and other regions are carried out through the Ternium commercial
network and in 2010 were mainly destined for Vietnam, Italy, Pakistan and Australia.
Pricing
The prices of our steel products generally reflect international market prices for similar
products. We adjust prices for our products periodically in response to changes in the import
prices of foreign steel, export prices, and supply and demand. See Item 5. Operating and
Financial Review and ProspectsOverview. The actual sales prices that we obtain for our
products are also subject to the specifications, sizes and quantity of the products ordered.
Marketing
Our marketing strategy is to continue increasing higher margin value-added products and
services in Terniums sales mix. We expect to increase Terniums offerings of value-added
products, such as cold-rolled sheets and coated and tailor-made products, and services, such
as just-in-time deliveries and inventory management. In order to do so, Ternium will continue
to work with its customers to anticipate their needs and develop customized products for
particular applications and to maintain a strategic presence in several steel markets through
its network of commercial offices.
Ternium adapts its marketing strategy according to the different regions it serves. Its sales
force specializes in different regional requirements ranging from product specifications to
transport logistics.
In order to increase Terniums participation in regional markets and improve services
provided to customers, Ternium manages its exports through Ternium Internacionals network of
commercial offices. Ternium Internacional operates through subsidiaries strategically located
in Terniums key international markets, providing customers with support and services.
Ternium Internacional has extensive experience promoting steel products. Its marketing
expertise helps Ternium to expand its position in current markets and to develop new ones.
North America Region
The North American steel market is highly competitive, since most major international steel
producers direct part of their sales efforts to this region. Terniums steel customers in
Mexico are in the construction sector, automotive and home appliances industries, among other
sectors. In Mexico, where our main production facilities are located, we can offer customized
services.
Through our service centers, located in the southern United States and in northern and
central Mexico, Ternium can cut, paint or roll-form its products to specific client
requirements. Customized products include metallic roofing, auto parts and cut-to-length
products used in the home appliance and construction industries.
Ternium has commercial offices in Mexico and the United States. These offices provide
services such as logistics, stock management and customer assistance, as well as analysis of
businesses opportunities in their respective markets.
Ternium Mexico has a department focused on the development of small- and medium-sized
companies in Mexico under a program created by the Techint group for the development of its
customers and the local industry (Propymes). The objective of the program is to improve the
competitiveness of customers and suppliers, to increase their exports and allow them to
substitute imports with local products. Approximately 150 companies are part of this program
in Mexico, which provides support for industrial, training, and institutional requirements of
the participating companies.
Several Mexican steel producers compete with us in the flat and long steel markets, as
dicussed below in Competition. Terniums experienced sales force specializes in the needs
of each market sector and focuses on value-added products and services. In this competitive
and end-user oriented market, the extensive use of well-known commercial brands allows
customers to clearly recognize Terniums products. Ternium seeks to increase its competitive
advantage by providing value-added services, including the technical assistance related to
steel use and production, and developing new steel products.
36
South and Central America Region
A principal component of Terniums marketing strategy in South and Central America is
establishing lasting and close relationships with customers. This allows Ternium to provide
assistance to its customers in their use of steel products and to obtain downstream
information that can be applied to future product development.
Terniums sales force in this region is oriented toward serving the specific needs of
different market sectors, such as the construction industry, the automotive industry, the
home appliances sector, the packaging sector (for food, paints, sprays and petrochemicals),
the agricultural equipment and capital goods sector, the tube and pipe sector (related to
liquids and gas transportation and distribution), and steel processors.
Through Siderars service centers in Argentina
and Terniums service centers, located in Colombia, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala,
Honduras and Nicaragua, Ternium can cut, paint or roll-form
its products to specific client requirements. Customized products include metallic roofing,
auto parts, steel for agricultural machinery, different types of tin used to produce sprays
and food containers and cut-to-length products used in the home appliance and construction
industries.
Ternium has commercial offices in Argentina, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, El Salvador,
Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, Panama and Uruguay. These offices provide services such as
market development, analysis of businesses opportunities, and customer support in their
respective countries. Propymes was implemented in Argentina in 2002, with the objective of
promoting the local industry. Approximately 490 companies are part of this program, which
provides support for industrial, training, commercial, financial and institutional
requirements of the participating companies.
Europe and Other
A small share of Terniums shipments is destined for steel markets outside the Americas.
Sales to Europe, Asia and Africa are carried out mainly through Ternium Internacionals
office in Spain. Ternium Internacional is focused on trading activities, including the
development of commercial and marketing activities.
Competition
Global Market
The steel industry operates predominantly on a regional basis, with large industry
participants selling the bulk of their steel production in their home countries or regions,
where they have natural advantages and are able to more effectively market value-added
products and provide additional customized services. Despite the limitations associated with
significant transportation costs, as well as the restrictive effects of protective tariffs
and other trade restrictions,
international trade of steel has generally increased in the last decade as production has
shifted towards low-cost production regions. In addition, since 2002, several large steel
manufacturers have merged with each other or acquired steel companies in other parts of the
world. This wave of consolidation has resulted in a number of large, global producers with
significant operations in several regions and/or continents, contributing to the increasing
globalization of the steel industry. Considered as a whole, however, the steel industry still
remains considerably fragmented, compared with market conditions characterizing certain of
our suppliers and customers, e.g. iron ore suppliers and the automotive industry.
Steel consumption has historically been centered in developed economies such as the United
States, Western Europe and Japan. However, in recent years steel consumption in Asia, and in
particular China, has increased significantly. Moreover, while production in Europe, Japan
and the United States remains significant, steel producers in those regions have increasingly
focused on the rolling and finishing of semi-finished products.
There has been a trend in recent years toward steel industry consolidation among Terniums
competitors. In addition, the Venezuelan government has reestablished itself as a steel
producer with the nationalization of Sidor. Below is a summary of the most significant
transactions:
|
|
|
June 2006: Mittal Steel and Arcelor merge to create ArcelorMittal, the worlds largest
steel company. |
37
|
|
|
March 2007: Votorantim acquires Colombias Aceria Paz del Rio. |
|
|
|
April 2007: Tata Steel completes the acquisition of Corus. |
|
|
|
July 2007: Gerdau acquires Chaparral Steel. |
|
|
|
August 2007: US Steel acquires Stelco. |
|
|
|
March 2008 to May 2008: Severstal acquires Sparrows Point, WCI Steel and Esmark
(subsequently during 2011 it divested Sparrows Point, Warren and Wheeling). |
|
|
|
February 2011: Nippon Steel and Sumitomo announce a merger plan. |
|
Despite this trend, the global steel market remains highly fragmented. In 2010, the five
largest steel producers, ArcelorMittal, Hebei, Baosteel, Angang and Wuhan, accounted for 19%
of total worldwide steel production, compared to 15% for the five largest steel producers in
2000. |
Steel prices in general, including both flat and long products, have exhibited significant
volatility in recent years. From 2000 to 2002, the industry, especially in North America,
experienced fluctuating capacity utilization, low demand growth levels and other adverse
conditions, which led to depressed steel prices, adversely impacting many steel producers
profitability. In 2003 and 2004, steel prices increased worldwide, due to higher economic
growth in most regions, particularly China and other developing countries, as well as higher
raw material prices (iron ore, ferroalloys and energy). During the first quarter of 2008,
steel prices went up significantly due to higher demand for steel products and higher input
costs resulting from constraints in the availability of raw materials. However, this trend
reversed beginning in the second half of 2008 due to a global economic downturn, with prices
and costs declining steeply. In the second half of 2009 and first half of 2010, steel prices
recovered, reflecting the improving conditions in steel markets worldwide and higher raw
material costs, but gradually declined during most of the second half of the year as steel
demand was not strong enough to digest capacity restarts and additions mainly in the United
States. Finally, steel prices rebounded by year-end 2010 supported by an increase in
apparent steel demand, but decreased during the second quarter of 2011.
North America Region
Mexico. Ternium has strong domestic competitors in the Mexican steel market and faces
significant competition from imports. According to Canacero, the Mexican chamber of the iron
and steel industry, imports of hot-rolled, cold-rolled and galvanized steel products in
Mexico accounted for approximately 31%, 27% and 33% of the Mexican market in 2010, 2009 and
2008, respectively, as steel consumption in Mexico is higher than the installed steel
capacity in the country.
The largest Mexican competitor in the flat products market is AHMSA, an integrated steel
producer located in Monclova, Coahuila, that produces a wide variety of steel products. AHMSA
focuses on low value added products such as plate and commercial quality hot-rolled and
cold-rolled coils. Other significant domestic competitors are Lámina y Placa Comercial S.A.
de C.V. (Grupo Villacero), a producer of galvanized coils and a distributor of steel products
with operations throughout Mexico, and POSCO, a Korean steel company that produces galvanized
coils in Mexico.
In the rebar market, Terniums largest competitor is ArcelorMittal. To a lesser extent,
Ternium also faces competition from Aceros San Luis and Deacero. In the low-carbon wire rod
market, Terniums main competitors are Deacero, ArcelorMittal and, to a lesser extent,
Talleres y Aceros and Aceros San Luis.
In the small diameter welded pipe market, Terniums main competitors are Tubería Laguna,
Maquilacero and imports. Orders in this market are usually small and cover a wide range of
product specifications.
United States. Ternium has a very small participation in the U.S. steel markets in comparison
with U.S. domestic steel manufacturers and importers. It successfully competes in the Gulf
Coast and a large portion of the West Coast where its facilities have logistic advantages.
38
South and Central America Region
Terniums most significant markets in the South and Central America Region are Argentina and
Colombia. Other relevant markets in the region are Central America, Chile and Paraguay.
Argentina. Siderar is the main producer of flat rolled steel products in Argentina. Its main
competition in the Argentine flat steel market are imports, mainly from Brazil. The main
Brazilian producers of flat steel value-added products are Usiminas, Companhia Siderúrgica
Nacional and ArcelorMittal.
Although Siderar has been the principal flat steel provider in Argentina since its
foundation, foreign competition has challenged its market positioning in the country. For
example, during the 1990s, Siderars market share in Argentina decreased as a result of
imports of steel products at very low prices. See RegulationsTrade regulations.
Colombia. On August 25, 2010, Ternium completed the acquisition of a 54% ownership interest
in Ferrasa. Ferrasa has a 100% ownership interest in Sidecaldas S.A.S., Figuraciones S.A.S.
and Perfilamos del Cauca S.A.S., all of which are also Colombian companies. For more
information on the Ferrasa acquisition, see note 3 to our audited consolidated financial
statements included elsewhere in this annual report.
Ferrasa is the main flat steel processor in Colombia and a long steel producer. Its main
competitors in the Colombian steel market are Acerías de Colombia, Acerías Paz del Río and
Diaco. Through the acquisition of Ferrasa, Ternium intends to increase its market share in
Colombia, the third largest Latin American steel market in 2010.
Other South and Central American markets. Ternium keeps an active presence in the region,
particularly in those steel markets where there is absence or limited presence of domestic
competitors. Ternium keeps a leading position in the flat steel markets of Paraguay and
Uruguay and has a strong presence in the flat steel markets of Chile and Bolivia, where the
location of Terniums facilities in neighboring Argentina provides a logistical advantage to
supply these markets vis a vis its competitors. In addition, Ternium keeps an active presence
in the steel markets of Ecuador and Peru, although it usually faces strong competition in
these markets from steel producers located in Brazil and Venezuela. Finally, Ternium keeps a
leading position in the flat steel market of Central America, where it leverages its
logistical advantages stemming from the location of its facilities in Costa Rica, El
Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, Mexico and Panama.
Capital Expenditure Program
Capital expenditures in Terniums facilities during 2010 amounted to approximately USD350
million. In light of the global economic downturn, in 2009 we delayed, reassessed or canceled
a significant part of previously announced capital expenditure plans and projects. We
subsequently resumed our activities with a reassessed plan and currently expect that our
capital expenditures for 2011 will amount to approximately USD700 million and that such
amount will be financed mainly with cash from operations.
The main objectives of Terniums current capital expenditure program are to:
|
|
|
maintain and replace equipment; |
|
|
|
increase processing capacity; |
|
|
|
reduce production costs; |
|
|
|
improve product quality, equipment reliability and productivity; |
|
|
|
comply with applicable environmental standards; and |
|
|
|
provide enhanced customer services. |
In the past, we announced new investments and projects to be developed in Mexico and in
Argentina. These investments were aimed at increasing steel production and processing
capacity through the construction of new facilities and the expansion of existing ones. The
current status of these projects is discussed below.
39
North America Region
During 2010, Terniums capital expenditures in the region amounted to USD161 million. We
carried out a basic capital expenditure plan in order to maintain our equipments operating
performance and to improve logistics, and at the same time we continued with some projects of
which the most significant were:
|
|
|
Revamping of a cold-rolling mill in Mexico. This mill is part of the Churubusco
unit of Ternium Mexicos operations. This improvement involves an investment of
approximately USD60 million and is expected to provide an additional annual rolling
capacity of 380 thousand tons. |
|
|
|
Revamping of a grinding plant. This plant is part of the Las Encinas mining
operations in Mexico. The project is aimed at expanding the facilitys iron ore
processing capacity and is expected to be completed during 2011. |
In 2008, Ternium announced a greenfield project to build a flat steel plant in Mexico, which
was aimed at expanding its production capacity. In its initial phase, the project would
involve the design and construction of a mini-mill and a hot-rolling mill in the Monterrey
area, while its second phase would involve the construction of a cold-rolled and galvanizing
plant, including a pickling line and a cold-rolled tandem mill, and a hot-dipped galvanizing
line, to serve the industrial and commercial markets. Subsequently, Ternium changed the
sequence of the project, and resolved to build the cold-rolling and galvanizing facilities
first, thereby changing the second phase to first phase. As part of this project, in October
2010, Ternium and Nippon Steel Corporation signed a definitive agreement to form a joint
venture in Mexico for the manufacturing and sale of hot-dip galvanized and galvannealed steel
sheets to serve the Mexican automobile market. The joint venture company, Tenigal, was
established in November 2010 with Ternium and Nippon Steel holding 51% and 49% participations,
respectively. Ternium expects that construction of the facility would require a total
investment of approximately USD350 million. Tenigal began work for the construction of a
hot-dip galvanizing plant in the vicinity of Monterrey City, which is expected to commence
production of high-grade and high-quality galvanized and galvannealed automotive steel sheets,
including outer-panel and high-strength qualities, in 2013. In addition, Ternium Mexico plans
to construct new pickling, cold-rolling, annealing and tempering lines at the same site. Part
of the output from these lines will be used to supply the Tenigal plant. Ternium expects that
construction of these lines would require a total investment of approximately USD700 million
and commence production in 2013. For more information on the Tenigal joint venture, see note
31 to our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report.
South and Central America Region
During 2010, Terniums capital expenditures in the region amounted to USD189 million. We
carried out a basic capital expenditure plan to maintain our equipments operating performance
and continued with some projects, of which the most significant were carried out in Argentina:
|
|
|
Relining of blast furnace No. 1. This mill is part of the San Nicolás unit of
Siderars operations. The preparatory works for this project began in 2007, and the
relining work commenced in October 2008. The project was completed in the first half of
2010. |
|
|
|
Progress in the expansion of hot rolling mill capacity. This mill is part of the
San Nicolás unit of Siderars operations. The expansion entails the installation of an
additional coiler and exit, enabling an increase in the mills annual processing capacity
of approximately 100,000 tons of slabs. The project is expected to be completed during
2012. |
|
|
|
Revamping and expansion of the by-products plant at Siderars coking facilites.
These facilities are part of the San Nicolás unit of Siderars operations. The project is
expected to be completed during 2012. |
|
|
|
Progress in repairs and enhancements at Siderars coking facilities. Works included
repairs in one chimney (expected to be completed during 2011), in coke oven battery #2
(completed during 2010) and in coke oven battery #4 (expected to be completed during
2012). |
|
|
|
Construction of a river port for barges. This facility, which is part of the San
Nicolás unit of Siderars operations, is designed for unloading barged iron ore, which
represents approximately half of the total iron ore volume received in Siderars ports.
Construction of this port was completed in the first half of 2011. |
|
|
|
Expansion of service center processing capacity. These projects involved the
installation of new slitters at the Florencio Varela and Rosario units and a new roll
forming line at the Canning unit of Siderars operations. |
40
In 2011, Ternium intends to further develop its ongoing projects, to start new ones aimed at
fulfilling its main objectives, and to continue evaluating growth opportunities in the region.
Accordingly, we continue making progress in the projects describe above and, in addition, we
are advancing the following projects:
|
|
|
Revamping of Siderars continuous caster in the steel shop. The revamping is
expected to increase the operating reliability of the equipment. |
|
|
|
Construction of a vacuum degassing in the steel shop. This equipment will enable
the production of interstitial-free steel for certain applications in the automobile
industry. |
|
|
|
Replacement of staves in blast furnace No. 2 in Argentina. This is expected to
increase the operating reliability of the equipment and is expected to be completed
during 2012. |
|
|
|
Expansion of processing capacity in Argentina. Works include the revamping and
expansion of a hot-dip galvanizing mill, a new slitter and the expansion of warehouse
capacity. |
In addition, our subsidiary Ternium Brasil S.A. is currently assessing expansion opportunities
in Brazil. As part of this evaluation, Ternium Brasil has taken (and may continue to take)
several preparatory steps and has engaged (and may continue to engage) in negotiations with
third parties. Ternium, however, has not made any final decision in connection with any of
these expansion opportunities.
Information technology investments
We spent an aggregate of approximately USD20 million in information technology during 2010,
mainly for the integration of our Mexican facilities into Terniums core business
administration system.
Raw Materials, Energy and Other Inputs
The main inputs for Terniums facilities in Mexico are slabs, iron ore, steel scrap, natural
gas and electricity, while the main inputs materials at Siderars integrated steel facilities
in Argentina are iron ore and coal. Below is a more complete description of the supply
conditions for raw materials, energy and other inputs at Terniums facilities in these
countries. For a description of some of the risks associated with Terniums access to raw
materials, energy and
other inputs, see Item 3. Key InformationD. Risk FactorsRisks Relating to the Steel
IndustryPrice fluctuations or shortages in the supply of raw materials, slabs and energy
could adversely affect Terniums profitability.
Mexico
In Mexico, Terniums manufacturing of finished steel products relies on the supply of crude
steel from its steelmaking facilities, which are based on the mini-mill technology, and on the
purchase of crude steel slabs from third parties. The mini-mill technology melts a variable
combination of direct reduced iron and steel scrap to produce steel slabs, billets and round
bars. Terniums production process requires extensive use of natural gas and electricity.
Third-party slabs are the largest component of production costs; iron ore, scrap, electricity
and natural gas costs are also significant.
Slabs. Terniums Mexican subsidiary has some non-integrated facilities that consume large
quantities of slabs purchased from third-party steel suppliers. Currently, slabs are purchased
both in Mexico (primarily from ArcelorMittal) and in the international markets. In addition,
in the past Siderar supplied slabs from time to time to our Mexican operations. Slab
consumption varies significantly year to year in accordance with market conditions. Our
Mexican subsidiary purchased 2.6 million, 1.7 million and 2.4 million tons of slabs in 2010,
2009 and 2008, respectively. Slab purchase prices are market-based.
41
Iron ore. As described under Production Facilities and ProcessesIron ore mining
facilities above, Terniums subsidiaries own interests in two mining companies in Mexico:
100% of the equity of the Las Encinas and a 50% equity stake in Peña Colorada. In 2010,
Terniums Mexican facilities sourced 100% of their iron ore requirements from the mines
operated by these two companies. Under our arrangement with Peña Coloradas other shareholder,
an ArcelorMittal subsidiary, we are committed to off-take 50% of the annual production of the
Peña Colorada mine. In 2010, approximately 88% of the iron ore production available to Ternium
went to our own direct reduction plants and the remaining 12% was sold in the international
markets. Most of the iron ore exports during 2010 were made on a spot price basis.
Scrap. In 2010, approximately 83% of Terniums scrap requirements were obtained in the Mexican
market through its own steel scrap collecting and processing operations and approximately 17%
was purchased in the United States. Scrap is purchased at market prices.
Electricity. Electric arc furnaces consume large quantities of electricity. During 2010, 59%
of Ternium Mexicos total consumption was supplied by the Comisión Federal de Electricidad or
CFE, Mexicos state-owned electricity company. The remainder was mostly purchased under
long-term contracts from two other suppliers with power plants in the Monterrey area,
Iberdrola Energía Monterrey, S.A. de C.V. (Iberdrola), a subsidiary of a Spanish utility
company, and Tractebel Energía de Monterrey, S. de R.L. de C.V. (Tractebel), a subsidiary of
a U.S. utility company. We have a long-term contract with Iberdrola for approximately 111 MW
power capacity and a long-term contract with Tractebel for aproximately 90 MW power capacity.
Electricity purchases under these contracts are made at prices linked to prevailing market
conditions.
Natural gas. Natural gas is mainly used as a reducing agent for the production of DRI and for
the reheating of slabs and billets before the hot-rolling process. In Mexico, Ternium
purchases natural gas from Pemex, the Mexican state-owned oil and gas company that is Mexicos
sole producer of natural gas, and from three distributors: Gas Industrial de Monterrey S.A. de
C.V. (GIMSA), Compañía Mexicana de Gas (CMG) and Gas Natural Mexico. Natural gas prices for
Ternium Mexico are determined based on the average of the quoted prices of several indexes
plus transportation and service costs depending on the areas or cities or pursuant to the
methodology approved by the Energy Regulatory Commission for prices applicable to an area, as
the case may be. Those prices are related to the market prices of natural gas in the southern
United States.
Argentina
In Argentina, Siderar produces crude steel through the use of blast furnace technology. The
principal raw materials used to produce steel are iron ore and coal. The manufacturing process
also requires significant quantities of electricity and natural gas.
Iron ore. Iron ore is purchased under long-term agreements from suppliers in neighboring
Brazil. Prices under these contracts are determined in accordance with market conditions. Our
main suppliers of iron ore, in the form of lumps, pellets and sinter feed fines, are Vale and
MMX. Our geographic location provides favorable access to high quality
iron ore lump and fines produced in Brazils iron ore mines in the Pantanal Region (Mato
Grosso do Sul state), which are transported on barges navigating the Paraguay and Parana
Rivers; accordingly, our costs associated with the provision of iron ore are low in comparison
with customers requiring seaborne shipping. In addition, Siderars steelmaking facility in
Argentina receives iron ore pellets and fines from ports located on Brazils ocean coast.
Coking coal and related materials. Siderar obtains its coke through the distillation of coking
coal and petroleum coke in its coke ovens. Siderar requires different types of coal to produce
coke. Coking coal is purchased under short-term contracts and on the spot market from several
major international suppliers based mainly in Australia and the United States. Prices under
contracts are determined in accordance with market conditions. Petroleum coke is sourced
domestically from oil companies such as Exxon Mobil and Repsol YPF. The volume purchased from
each supplier mainly depends on technical quality requirements of the blast furnace
operations.
Electricity. Siderar consumes large quantities of electricity for its manufacturing
activities, particularly in its San Nicolás and Ensenada facilities. The electricity required
to cover most of our facilities needs is self-generated by a wholly-owned thermoelectric plant
with an installed power capacity of 110 MW located at the San Nicolás facility. Most of the
energy requirements of the thermoelectric plant are obtained from blast furnace and coke oven
gases and from steam that is purchased at market prices from a power plant located at the San
Nicolás facility owned by Siderca S.A.I.C., a subsidiary of Tenaris, under a long-term steam
sales agreement. The rest of the requirements are covered through the purchase of natural gas
from different market vendors, or with alternative sources of energy such as fuel oil. Siderar
covers electricity shortfalls or sells excesses, as the case may be, at spot prices in the
wholesale market. In order to mitigate these shortfalls, it entered into electricity supply
contracts with the Central Puerto and Genelba power plants, both owned by Petrobras. Over the
course of the last several years, demand for electricity has increased substantially,
resulting in shortages of electricity to residential and industrial users during periods of
high demand. Accordingly, in 2008 certain Siderar facilities suffered interruptions in their
electricity supply at peak hours.
42
Natural gas. Siderar also consumes substantial volumes of natural gas, particularly to operate
its blast furnace and power generation facilities. Siderar purchases natural gas at market
prices mainly from Pan American Energy, Total Austral, Tecpetrol S.A., a company controlled by
San Faustin, and natural gas traders, including MetroEnergía, Albanesi, Gas Patagonia and
Energy Traders. As is the case with electricity, natural gas demand has increased
significantly, and supply to industrial users (including Siderar) has often been restricted
during the Argentine winter.
Siderar has separate transportation agreements with Transportadora de Gas del Norte S.A.
(TGN), Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.A. (TGS), Camuzzi Gas Pampeana S.A. (Camuzzi),
Gas Natural Ban S.A. (Gasban) and Metrogas. The main transportation contract is with TGN, a
company partially owned by San Faustin, which expires in April 2013. For the final
distribution phase, Siderar has several distribution contracts with Litoral Gas (a company
partially owned by San Faustin), Camuzzi, Gasban and Metrogas. The principal contract is with
Litoral Gas, which expires in December 2011.
Other inputs. Siderar has on-site oxygen, nitrogen and argon separation plants in order to
extract these gases for use in the steelmaking process. Siderars separation plants are being
managed by Air Liquide Argentina S.A. (Air Liquide). Siderar is a party to a long-term
contract with Air Liquide for the supply of oxygen, nitrogen and argon. The agreement requires
Siderar to take or pay minimum daily amounts of these gases for an aggregate amount of USD62.9
million to satisfy Siderars current production needs through 2021, and to make incremental
purchases of these gases for an aggregate amount of USD113.5 million to satisfy the
requirements through 2025 of a new separation facility to be constructed as part of Siderars
expansion plan. As a result of the severe global crisis that began in 2008 and the
uncertainties surrounding the evolution of steel demand in the domestic and global markets,
the parties engaged in discussions for the renegotiation of the contract. In February 2011,
Siderar and Air Liquide reached agreement on the terms of the renegotiation; the obligations
of the parties under the agreement related to the new separation facility were suspended
through March 31, 2012, and Siderar agreed to purchase from Air Liquide certain equipment for
an aggregate amount of approximately USD22.3 million. If Siderar was to resume its expansion
plan on or prior to March 31, 2012, Air Liquide would be required to repurchase that
equipment, and all of the parties obligations under the contract would be reinstated;
otherwise, all rights and obligations relating to the new separation plant and the related
supply of gases would terminate automatically on March 31, 2012, and Siderar would be required
to pay to Air Liquide an aggregate amount currently estimated at USD12 million.
Colombia
In Colombia, Terniums manufacturing of finished steel products relies on two sources: (a) the
production of steel in its steelmaking facilities, which are based on the Electric Arc Furnace
(EAF) technology; and (b) on the purchase of steel products, both from our overseas
subsidiaries and from third parties. The EAF technology melts steel scrap to produce steel
billets, which are then rolled into various long products. Terniums production process
requires extensive use of electricity. Steel products are the largest component of production
costs; scrap and electricity costs are also significant.
Steel products. Terniums operations in Colombia include non-integrated facilities that
process steel supplied by Terniums overseas subsidiaries at market prices and also process
steel purchased from third-party suppliers. The majority of third-party purchased steel is
procured in the local market consisting mainly of long products. Steel products consumption
varies significantly year to year in accordance with market conditions. From August 25, 2010,
when we acquired our Colombian subsidiary, until year-end 2010, our subsidiary purchased more
than 50,000 tons of steel products from third parties.
Scrap. Scrap is the main raw material for producing steel in our steelmaking facilities in
Colombia. Ternium sources 100% of its steel scrap needs from the local scrap market.
Electricity. Manizales is our main electricity consuming unit in Colombia, mainly due to its
electric arc furnace-based steel production operations. Manizales purchases electricity from
ISAGEN S.A. E.S.P., a Colombian power company, under a five-year supply contract expiring in
April 2013. The contract is based on annual consumption rates of approximately 68,400 MWH.
Electricity prices under the contract are determined according to local regulations and
adjusted with the wholesale prices index.
43
Product Quality Standards
Ternium develops its products and services with a philosophy of continuous improvement and
seeks to excel in its internal quality control of its products and processes. Terniums
products are manufactured in accordance with proprietary standards and the requirements of
customers, and within the specifications of recognized international standardization entities
including the International Organization for Standardization, or ISO, the American Society for
Testing and Materials, or ASTM, the European Standards, or EN, the Japanese Industrial
Standards, or JIS, the Society of Automotive Engineers, or SAE, and the standards of the
American Petroleum Institute, or API.
Ternium established and implemented a Quality Management System (QMS) and continuously
improves its effectiveness in compliance with the requirements of the applicable ISO 9001:2008
and ISO / TS 16949:2009, intended for production to automotive supplies, and other specific
requirements. Terniums QMS operates with aligned strategies, objectives and criteria
throughout Terniums subsidiaries. To keep its ISO multisite certification, the QMS is yearly
audited by Lloyds Register Quality Assurance. In 2010, our Mexican and Guatemalan facilities,
as well as Siderars ones, were recertified as part of the multisite certification scheme.
Ternium Mexicos and Siderars metallurgical testing laboratories are accredited for the
performance of various technical tests in accordance with ISO/IEC 17025:2005 General
Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories or equivalent
standards.
Research and Development; Product Development
Product research and development activities at Ternium are conducted through a central Product
Development Department in coordination with local teams that operate in several of our
facilities. Applied research efforts are carried out in-house and in conjunction with
universities and research centers, as well as through the participation in international
consortia. Ternium also develops new products and processes in cooperation with its
industrial customers.
In 2010, Terniums product research and development activities focused on increasing the
industrial integration of its newly acquired facilities in Colombia and on the development of
products aimed at increasing market share and adding value to our products. Ternium continued
carrying out its medium-term product research and development plan, encompassing foreseen
product requirements and associated new equipment, which it considers a key input for the
design of Terniums capital expenditure projects and differentiating strategies.
In 2010, Ternium continued the development of processing routes aimed at integrating and
increasing utilization rates at its production units and, ultimately, at replacing steel
products procured from third parties with products manufactured in-house and developing new
markets. For example, hot-rolled, cold-rolled and coated coils manufactured in our production
units in Mexico were further processed in our recently acquired facilities in Colombia,
targeting the Andean steel market for structural products, pressure vessels, white goods and
enameled products. In addition, billets manufactured in our production units in Mexico were
further processed in our hot-rolling mill in Colombia to supply the local construction steel
market.
During 2010, Ternium developed new products for certain construction steel markets in Central
America, including various types of reinforcing bars and billets. In addition, Ternium
developed large diameter bars for the Andean market for use in mountain road infrastructure
development. Ternium expanded the product range of pre-engineered metal buildings through the
development of manufacturing processes of heavy structures used in large industrial buildings.
In addition, Ternium developed structural high-toughness hot-rolled steel for use in a mining
project in Argentina, and developed new panels in compliance with the Montreal Protocol
regulations and is now able, ahead of its schedules, to manufacture panels without using
foaming agents that could potentially damage the ozone layer.
In 2010 we continued certifying our products with existing customers in the automotive
industry in Mexico and Argentina, related to newly defined standards and new car models to be
produced in these countries. In this regard, Ternium gained market share upon receiving
customer approval of our electro-galvanized products for exposed surface and hot-rolled and
cold-rolled low-carbon drawing grade steels. We also received customer approval for hot-rolled
pickled and oiled structural grades for use in the wheel and hydro-formed tubes market
segments. Other products we developed in 2010 included novel silicon-killed wire rod steel
grades with enhanced toughness for the manufacturing of high resistance springs used in light
and heavy vehicles, hot-rolled grades for welded pipes applied in boilers and heat exchangers,
painted galvanized steel sheets for air conditioners, and high strength painted cold-rolled
steel for lighting fixtures.
44
Terniums medium-term product research and development plans are based on a continuing
assessment of steel product performance and the emerging requirements of the industry, carried
out in close collaboration with leading steel customers. Based on customer needs, we improve,
adapt and create new applications and define future technology requirements at our facilities.
With the aim at further developing our metallurgical knowledge and its applications, we
continued participating in various medium-term projects, including those relating to
high-quality low-inclusion steel in association with Cinvestav (a Mexican research center);
applications for the automotive industry through consortiums associated with Canadian McMaster
University and the International Zinc Association, as well as in association with the
University of Pittsburgh and the Argentine Steel Institute; applications for buildings through
a consortia associated with the French Corrosion Institute; and applications for the canning
industry through a consortia associated with the International Tin Research Institute.
In 2011, Ternium plans to expand its product range for the automotive, pressure vessels, heavy
machinery and agricultural sectors through the development of high-strength steel grades,
mainly to increase market share and the value added to our products. In addition, Ternium
expects to complete an ongoing project aimed at manufacturing high-quality low-inclusion bars
for the oil and gas industry, a new product family for seamless pipe manufacturing, and
expects to explore product development opportunities for application in oil and gas wells
aimed at participating in the high-end coiled tubing market. In addition, Ternium expects to
implement an IT system in Mexico fully integrating product and processing route specifications
among its plants. This effort should enable significant optimization in our processes and
products, including increasing opportunities for productivity enhancement, cost reduction and
inventory optimization. In applied research, Ternium intends to continue developing ongoing
projects with focus on several developments for the automobile and electric motor sectors, and
plans to launch projects aimed at developing continuous casting processes for ultra-low carbon
steel grades for application in the automobile sector. These developments should allow us to
assess future technology requirements as well as to incorporate, within its product range, a
new family of high-end finished steel products.
We spent an aggregate of USD5.7 million for research and development in 2010, compared to
USD6.0 million in 2009 and USD7.0 million in 2008.
Regulations
Environmental Regulation
Terniums operations (including mining activities in Mexico) are subject to a broad range of
environmental laws, regulations, permit requirements and decrees relating to the protection of
human health and environment, including laws and regulations relating to land use; air
emissions; wastewater treatment and discharges; the use, handling and disposal of hazardous or
toxic materials and the handling and disposal of solid wastes. Laws and regulations protecting
the environment have become increasingly complex and more stringent and expensive to implement
in recent years. International environmental requirements vary.
Terniums revised corporate environmental policy commits each of its business units to comply
with all applicable environmental laws and regulations and aims to achieve the highest
standards of environmental performance as a basis to enhance sustainable development.
Compliance with environmental laws and regulations, and monitoring regulatory changes, is
addressed primarily at the regional level.
Ternium reports to the World Steel Association eleven sustainability indicators, among which
carbon dioxide emissions data is being reported on an annual basis as part of the
associations initiative to collect emissions data from member companies. We support the steel
industrys ongoing effort to develop innovative solutions to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG)
emissions over the life cycle of steel products. According to the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change (IPCC), the steel industry accounts for approximately 3% to 4% of total world
GHG emissions.
Our steel production facilities in Mexico have achieved GHG-specific emission levels that are
close to the theoretical minimum. In Argentina, Siderars GHG-specific emission levels are
close to the industry average for blast furnace technology.
45
The ultimate impact of complying with existing laws and regulations is not always clearly
known or determinable since regulations under some of these laws have not yet been promulgated
or are undergoing revision. In addition, new laws and regulations could emerge as a result of
ongoing negotiations for new commitments on GHG emissions following the expiration of the
Kyoto Protocol in 2012. The expenditures necessary to remain in compliance with these laws and
regulations, including site or other remediation costs, or costs incurred from potential
environmental liabilities, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and
profitability. While we incur and will continue to incur expenditures to comply with
applicable laws and regulations, there always remains a risk that environmental incidents or
accidents may occur that may negatively affect our reputation or our operations.
Ternium has not been subject to any material penalty for any environmental violations in 2010,
and we are not aware of any current material legal or administrative proceedings pending
against Ternium with respect to environmental matters which could have an adverse material
impact on Terniums financial condition or results of operations.
Mining regulations in Mexico
Because our operations in Mexico include mining, we are also subject to Mexican regulations
relating to mining and mining concessions. Under Mexican law, mineral resources belong to the
Mexican nation and a concession from the Mexican federal government is required to explore for
or exploit mineral reserves. Pursuant to the Ley Minera (Mining Law), mining concessions may
only be granted to Mexican individuals and to legal entities incorporated under Mexican law.
Foreign investors may hold up to 100% of the shares of such entities.
A mining concession allows its holder to perform both exploration works (including identifying
mineral deposits and quantifying and evaluating economically minable reserves), and
exploitation works (including detaching and extracting mineral products from such deposits).
Mining concessions have a 50-year duration from the date of their recording in the Public
Mining Registry and may be extended for an equal term, provided certain requirements are met.
Mining concessions grant several specified rights to the concessionaire, including:
|
|
|
the right to dispose freely of mineral products obtained as a result of the
exploitation of the concession; |
|
|
|
the right to obtain the expropriation of, or an easement with respect to, the
land where the exploration or exploitation will be conducted; and |
|
|
|
the use of water in the mine to facilitate extraction. |
In addition, a concessionaire of a mining concession is obligated, among other things, to
explore or exploit the relevant concession, to pay for any relevant mining rights, to comply
with all environmental and safety standards, and to provide information to and permit
inspections by the Secretaría de Economía. Mining concessions may be terminated if the
obligations of the concessionaire are not satisfied.
A company that holds a concession must be registered with the Public Mining Registry. In
addition, mining concessions and permits, assignments, transfers and encumbrances must be
recorded with the Public Mining Registry to be enforceable. We believe that our material
mining concessions are duly registered in the Public Mining Registry.
Trade regulations
Intense global competition in the steel industry can lead many countries to increase duties or
impose restrictions on steel product imports to protect their domestic industries from trades
that are not made under market conditions or that are otherwise unfair. Such measures protect
domestic producers from increased imports sold at dumped or subsidized prices.
During a period of intense competition in 2001, some regions to which Ternium exports its
products, such as the United States and Europe, implemented these measures as well as other
general measures known as safeguards. While safeguards were lifted in December 2003,
antidumping and countervailing duties remain in place. At the same time, bilateral or regional
free trade agreements have liberalized trade among some countries, providing for reduced or
zero tariffs for many goods, including steel products.
46
Countries imposition of trade remedy measures and the entry into force of various free trade
agreements can and have both benefited and adversely affected Terniums home market and export
sales of steel products, as described below. See also Item 3. Key InformationD. Risk
FactorsCertain Regulatory Risks and Litigation RisksInternational trade actions or
regulations and trade-related legal proceedings could adversely affect Terniums sales,
revenues and overall business.
Mexico.
The Mexican government has imposed certain antidumping measures on steel import products that
are similar to the ones produced by Ternium Mexico. The following antidumping measures are
currently in effect:
Hot-rolled products: On March 28, 2000, the Mexican government imposed antidumping duties on
the Russian Federation and Ukraine of 30.31% and 46.66%, respectively. On March 25, 2005, the
first sunset review was initiated by the Mexican authorities, and on March 17, 2006 a final
resolution was issued, extending the antidumping duties for an additional five-year period. A
second sunset review was initiated on March 16, 2010 which is
still underway.
Furthermore, since September 2005, Mexico has imposed antidumping duties against Ukraine
(60.1%), Romania (67.60%) and Russia (36.80%) on cut-to-length plate in coils. Mexican
authorities are currently conducting a sunset review procedure which was initiated on
September 21, 2010. A final result is expected during September 2011.
In March 2008, the Mexican government imposed a provisional antidumping duty on cut-to-length
plate imports from China. The measure was lifted in October 6, 2008, as the Mexican
authorities concluded that their domestic industry was not suffering injury as a result of
such imports and thus decided not to conduct any further investigations thereon.
Cold-rolled products: In June 1999, Mexico imposed antidumping duties on cold-rolled steel
sheets from Bulgaria, the Russian Federation and Kazakhstan. On December 12, 2005, as a result
of the first sunset review, the Mexican authorities extended the antidumping duties for an
additional five-year period until June 2009. On December 28, 2010, following the completion of
the second sunset review procedure, the Mexican government published the final resolution
eliminating antidumping duties on cold-rolled steel sheets from Bulgaria and setting
antidumping duties on cold-rolled steel sheets from the Russian Federation at 15% and from
Kazakhstan at 22%.
Plate in coil: Since June 1996, an antidumping duty of 29.3% on imports from Russia has been
imposed. In June 2003, the first sunset review resolution concluded the application of the
antidumping duty should continue. In June 2007, the Ministry of Economy issued the final
resolution of the second sunset review, determining the continuation of the antidumping duties
for an additional five-year period. The third sunset review began on June 6, 2011.
Long products: Brazilian imports of reinforcing bars are currently subject to an antidumping
duty of 57.69%. In June 2006, the second sunset review resolution determined the continuation
of antidumping duties for an additional five-year period. On August 9, 2010, a third sunset
review was initiated. Wire rod imports from Ukraine are subject to a duty of 30.52% since
September 2000. In June 2006, the first sunset review resolution determined the continuation
of antidumping duties for an additional five-year period. On September 7, 2010, a second
sunset review was initiated which is
still underway.
U.S. authorities have imposed a number of measures on flat and long steel import products from
Mexico, thereby restricting Terniums exports to that country. Below is a description of
measures currently in effect:
|
|
|
Ternium Mexicos wire rod exports are subject to an antidumping duty of 17.94%
pursuant to an antidumping duty order on carbon and certain alloy steel wire rod from
Mexico. Following the most recent sunset review, such duty was extended for five more
years beginning in June 2008. |
|
|
|
During 2007, the Department of Commerce (DoC) initiated an antidumping
investigation of light-walled rectangular pipe and tube (LWRPT) from, among other
countries, Mexico. On June 13, 2008, the DoC made a final determination of sales at less
than fair value in the investigation of LWRPT from Mexico and, consequently LWRPT from
Mexico is subject to antidumping duties. On February 18, 2011, the DoC published the
final results of the first administrative review by which Ternium Mexicos LWRPT exports
are now subject to an antidumping duty of 6.13%. |
47
|
|
|
Since 1992, pursuant to an antidumping duty order on circular welded non-alloy steel
pipe -or standard pipe- from various countries, including Mexico, standard
pipes manufactured by Hylsamex and Grupo Imsa were subject to antidumping duties. In
2007, such measures were extended for five more years. In August 2009, the DoC published
the final results of a changed circumstances review, concluding that Ternium Mexico is
the successor-in-interest to Hylsamex for purposes of determining antidumping duty
liability. As of June 2011, in accordance with the latest administrative review, the
applicable duty for Ternium Mexico is 48.33%. |
Mexico has signed trade agreements with several countries or trade blocs aimed at
liberalizing trade between them:
NAFTA was signed among Canada, Mexico and the United States and came into effect on January
1, 1994. NAFTA provided for the progressive elimination over a ten-year period of duties on,
among other things, steel products traded between or among Mexico, the United States and
Canada. As a result, zero tariffs currently apply to steel products traded within NAFTA
countries. Accordingly, Ternium has greater access to the U.S. and Canadian markets through
Ternium Mexico, but also faces increased competition in Mexico from U.S. and Canadian steel
imports. NAFTA provides that NAFTA member companies (including Mexican steel producers such
as Ternium Mexico) can challenge trade restrictions imposed by other NAFTA countries before a
binational dispute resolution panel.
The Mexican-European Free Trade Agreement, or MEFTA, became effective on July 1, 2000. MEFTA
provides for the phase-out and eventual elimination of Mexican and European duties on all
industrial goods, including finished steel products. The European Union, or EU, eliminated
all import duties on Mexican industrial goods, including finished steel products, as of
January 1, 2003, while Mexico eliminated all import duties on European industrial goods,
including finished steel products, as of January 1, 2007. Accordingly, Ternium has increased
access to EU markets under MEFTA through Ternium Mexico, but also could face increased
competition in Mexico from EU steel imports.
In November 2003, Mexico and Argentina signed an Economic Complementation Agreement, or ACE
6, whereby reciprocal tariff preferences were granted. In 2006, Mexico and Argentina modified
the ACE 6 Agreement, reducing to zero import duties on imports of certain steel products from
the other country. Zero import duties included exports from Mexico to Argentina and from
Argentina to Mexico for up to 90,000 tons per year of slabs, 60,000 tons per year of cold
rolled coils and 30,000 tons per year of corrosion resistant coils, including hot dip
galvanized and pre-painted sheets.
In addition, the Mexican government has signed trade agreements with Venezuela, Colombia, the
European Free Trade Associationan intergovernmental organization set up by Liechtenstein,
Norway, Iceland and Switzerland, Japan, Chile, Bolivia, Nicaragua, Costa Rica and Uruguay,
among others. However, the Mexico-Venezuela free trade agreement was terminated in November
2006.
On February 9, 2010, the Mexican Government issued a decree reducing the tariffs on several
steel product groups. The tariff for finished flat and long products was set at 3% for 2011
(from 5% in 2010 and 7% in 2009). The tariff for semi-finished products was set at 3% since
2010 (from 5% in 2009) and the tariff for welded pipe products was set at 7% since 2010 (from
10% in 2009).
Argentina.
The Argentine government has imposed various antidumping measures on certain steel imports
that compete directly with Terniums sales in Argentina. The following measures are currently
in effect:
Hot-rolled products: Since December 1999, the Argentine government has imposed antidumping
measures requiring a minimum import price for hot-rolled steel imports from Brazil, the
Russian Federation and Ukraine. Argentina accepted a price undertaking agreement from
Brazilian exporters. In 2006 Argentine authorities conducted a sunset review of these
measures and decided to continue them for five more years. In its decision, the Argentine
government determined antidumping duties for Russian, Ukrainian and Brazilian hot-rolled
steel exports to Argentina. A price undertaking for Brazilian exports was also accepted by
Argentine authorities. These measures expired in June 2011 as a result of an Argentine
government resolution that denied Siderars request for the government to initiate a new
investigation for an extension of these antidumping measures before their expiration. Siderar
has appealed this resolution.
48
Argentina has also imposed antidumping measures on hot-rolled steel imports from Kazakhstan
(39.91%), Romania (40.48%), Slovak Republic (62.09%) and South Africa (55.26%), effective
since April 2002. In October 2008, following completion of a sunset review initiated in May
2007, Argentine authorities decided to continue these measures for five more years.
Cold-rolled products: Since January 2003, Argentina has also imposed antidumping measures on
cold-rolled steel imports from Korea (60.46%), South Africa (83.07%), Kazakhstan (80.61%) and
Ukraine (71.22%). In July 2009, following completion of a sunset review initiated in January
2008, the Argentine authorities decided to continue these antidumping measures for one
year. A new sunset review is under way.
Galvanized products: Since May 2003, Argentina has imposed antidumping duties on galvanized
steel sheets from South Korea (49.67%), South Africa (27.90%), Australia (70.37%) and Taiwan
(33.09%). The petitioners requested the initiation of a sunset review in May 2008 to
determine whether the antidumping duties will be maintained for five more years. In November
2009, following completion of a sunset review initiated in May 2008, the Argentine government
decided to renew measures for three years, replacing previous ad valorem rates by specific
antidumping measures: USD243/ton for South Korea; USD286/ton for South Africa; USD247/ton for
Australia; and USD223/ton for Taiwan.
U.S. authorities had imposed a number of measures on steel import products from Argentina,
thereby restricting Terniums exports to that country in the past. Such measures were revoked
and, accordingly, none of them are currently in effect.
Argentina has signed free trade agreements with several countries or trade blocs aimed at
liberalizing trade between them.
In early 1991, the Argentine government reduced import tariffs and eliminated most non-tariff
restrictions on trade as part of an effort to open the Argentine economy to foreign
competition. In March 1991, Argentina, Brazil, Uruguay and Paraguay entered into the Treaty
of Asunción, creating the Mercado Común del Sur (Common Market of the South), or Mercosur, a
common market organization that aimed to bring about the free movement of goods, capital,
services and people among its member states. The Treaty of Ouro Preto, signed in 2004,
formalized a customs union among Mercosurs member states. Over time, the Mercosur has
eliminated or significantly reduced import duties, tariffs and other trade barriers among
member states. In particular, zero tariffs have applied to steel products imported from other
member states since January 1, 2000. The current tariff applicable to steel products imported
from outside Mercosur ranges from 2% to 16%.
In 2005, Mercosur entered into a trade agreement with Chile, pursuant to which all tariffs on
steel products have been eliminated. In 1996, Mercosur signed a free trade agreement with
Bolivia, pursuant to which all steel products began receiving a 100% tariff preference on
January 1, 2006. In 2004, Mercosur and the Comunidad Andina de Naciones (Andean Community), or
CAN, currently including Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador and Peru, signed a free trade agreement
aimed at reducing and eventually eliminating tariffs on steel products traded among member
countries over a period of 8 to 12 years. Mercosur is also negotiating free-trade agreements
with the EU, Mexico, India and South Africa. In May 2006, Venezuela became a junior member of
Mercosur and is currently seeking full membership in the group. Brazil, Argentina and Uruguay
have already approved Venezuelas membership. The matter is still pending before Congress in
Paraguay.
In November 1993, Argentina and Mexico signed an Economic Complementation Agreement, or ACE 6.
See Item 4. Information on the CompanyB. Business OverviewRegulationsTrade
Regulations Mexico.
Colombia.
No antidumping measures have been imposed in Colombia. Colombia has signed free trade
agreements with several countries or trade blocs aimed at liberalizing trade between them.
49
The CAN is a trading bloc, currently including Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador and Peru,
established during 1993 and approved during 1994 for the purpose of promoting trade relations
among its members and between the CAN and the rest of the world. The treaty formalized a
customs union among the CANs member states. Over time, the CAN has eliminated or
significantly reduced import duties, tariffs and other trade barriers among member states. In
particular, zero tariffs have applied to steel products imported from other member states
since January 1, 2000. The current tariff applicable to steel products imported from outside
the CAN is 5%. The CAN and Mercosur, signed a free trade agreement. See Item 4. Information
on the CompanyB. Business OverviewRegulationsTrade RegulationsArgentina.
During June 1994, Colombia and Mexico signed a free trade agreement. See Item 4. Information
on the CompanyB. Business OverviewRegulationsTrade RegulationsMexico.
On August 9, 2007, Colombia, El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras established the Triángulo
Norte (North Triangle), or TN, free trade agreement. Members of the TN signed multilateral
agreements related to funds transfers and local and most favored nation statuses, and signed
bilateral agreements aimed at reducing trade duties. Colombias free trade agreement with
Guatemala started on November 12, 2009; with El Salvador on February 1, 2010; and with
Honduras on March 27, 2010. Under TN, zero tariffs apply to several steel products imported
from other member states.
Colombia has also signed a free trade agreement with Chile in effect since May 2009, and has
signed free trade agreements still not effective with Canada, the United States of America
and the European Union.
Insurance
Our subsidiaries carry insurance policies covering property damage (including machinery
breakdown and business interruption), general liability and other insurance such as, among
others, automobile, marine cargo and life and workers compensation insurance. These insurance
policies include coverage and contract amounts which are customary in the steel products
industry and in line with legal and domestic market requirements. General liability coverage
typically includes third party, employers, sudden and accidental seepage and pollution and
product liabilities within limits up to USD100 million.
|
C. |
|
Organizational Structure |
|
|
|
|
Below is a simplified diagram of Terniums corporate structure. |
50
Subsidiaries
Ternium operates entirely through subsidiaries. For a complete list of its subsidiaries and a
description of its investments in other companies, see note 2 to our audited consolidated
financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report.
Ternium Mexico. Ternium Mexico was formed, as result of the merger of Grupo Imsa, Hylsamex and
Hylsamexs major shareholder in March 2008. Ternium Mexico and its subsidiaries operate all of
Terniums mining and steel production activities in Mexico, the United States, Guatemala,
Honduras, El Salvador, Nicaragua and Costa Rica. Ternium Mexico and its subsidiaries produce
flat and long steel products, including value-added finished steel products for use mainly in
the construction and industrial sectors. Ternium Mexico has a finished steel annual production
capacity of 7.4 million tons.
Siderar. Siderar is the main integrated manufacturer of flat steel products in Argentina with
total annual finished steel production capacity of 2.6 million tons. The shareholders of
Siderar as of March 31, 2011 are set out in the following table, together with the share
percentage owned by each such shareholder as of that date:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Siderar Shareholders |
|
Number |
|
|
Percent |
|
Ternium |
|
|
211,754,474 |
|
|
|
60.94 |
% |
ANSeS |
|
|
90,225,841 |
|
|
|
25.97 |
% |
Inversora Siderurgia Argentina S.A. (employees) |
|
|
8,912,146 |
|
|
|
2.56 |
% |
Public |
|
|
36,576,310 |
|
|
|
10.53 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
347,468,771 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Siderars shares are listed on the Buenos Aires Stock Exchange (Bolsa de Comercio de
Buenos Aires), or BASE, under the symbol ERAR. The Buenos Aires Stock Market (Mercado de
Valores de Buenos Aires), which is affiliated with the BASE, is the largest stock market in
Argentina. On June 16, 2011, the closing price of the Siderar shares on the BASE was ARP29.00
per share (approximately USD7.02 per share). For further information on the latest
developments involving Siderar following the enactment of Decree 441/2011, see Item 5.
Operating and Financial Review and ProspectsG. Recent DevelopmentsRecent Developments
involving Siderar.
Ferrasa. Ferrasa is a significant flat steel products processor and distributor in Colombia
and a scrap-based long steel manufacturer, with annual shipments of approximately 400,000 tons
and annual billet production capacity of
approximately 140,000 tons. Ternium holds, since August 25, 2010, a 54% ownership interest in
Ferrasa and in Ferrasa Panamá. The former controlling shareholders have an option to sell to
Ternium, at any time, all or part of their remaining 46% interest in each of Ferrasa and
Ferrasa Panamá, and Ternium will have an option to purchase all or part of that remaining
interest from the former controlling shareholders, at any time after August 25, 2012.
Tenigal. Tenigal is a joint venture company established in November 2010 for the manufacturing
and sale of hot-dip galvanized and galvannealed steel sheets to serve the Mexican automobile
market. Ternium and Nippon Steel hold 51% and 49% participations in Tenigal, respectively. The
company started work for the construction of its facilities and expects to commence production
of high-grade and high-quality galvanized and galvannealed automotive steel sheets, including
outer-panel and high-strength qualities, in 2013.
Ternium Brasil. Ternium Brasil was formed for the purpose of assessing expansion opportunities
in that country.
Ternium Internacional. Ternium Internacional comprises a network of companies in Spain,
Uruguay, the Netherlands and the United States that market and provide services in relation to
the sales of Terniums products to several markets other than Terniums main markets. The
headquarters of the network are located in Uruguay. Ternium Internacionals services include
sales and trading, offices and human resources dedicated to export trading, technical
assistance, commercial back office and credit analysis.
Other Investments
Exiros. Exiros provides our subsidiaries with purchase agency services in connection with
purchases of raw materials and other products or services. Exiross objectives are to procure
better purchase conditions and prices by exercising the improved bargaining power that results
from combining the demand of products and services by both Ternium and Tenaris. We have a 50%
share ownership and Tenaris has the remaining 50% share ownership in Exiros. Exiros offices
are strategically located in nine countries: Argentina, Brazil, Canada, China, Colombia,
Italy, Mexico, Romania and the United States.
51
|
D. |
|
Property, Plants and Equipment |
|
|
|
|
See B. Business OverviewProduction Facilities and Processes. |
|
|
|
Item 4A. |
|
Unresolved Staff Comments |
None
|
|
|
Item 5. |
|
Operating and Financial Review and Prospects |
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is
based on, and should be read in conjunction with, our audited consolidated financial
statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this annual report. This discussion and
analysis presents our financial condition and results of operations on a consolidated basis.
We prepare our consolidated financial statements in conformity with IFRS, which differ in
certain significant respects from U.S. GAAP.
Certain information contained in this discussion and analysis is presented elsewhere in this
annual report, including information with respect to our plans and strategies for our
business, and includes forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. See
Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Statements. In evaluating this discussion
and analysis, you should specifically consider the various risk factors identified in this
annual report and others that could cause results to differ materially from those expressed in
such forward-looking statements.
Overview
Ternium is a leading steel company in Latin America, manufacturing and processing a wide range
of flat and long steel products for customers active in the construction, home appliances,
capital goods, container, food, energy and automotive industries. Ternium has production
facilities in Mexico, Argentina, Colombia, the United States and Guatemala, as well as a
network of service centers which provide it with a strong position from which to serve its
core markets.
Ternium primarily sells its flat and long steel products in the regional markets of the
Americas. Ternium provides specialized products and delivery services through its network of
manufacturing facilities and service centers. We believe that Ternium is a leading supplier of
flat steel products in Mexico and Argentina, a significant supplier of steel products in
Colombia and in various other countries in South and Central America, and a competitive player
in the international steel market for flat and long steel products. Through its network of
commercial offices in several countries in Latin America, the United States and Spain, Ternium
maintains an international presence that allows it to reach customers outside its local
markets, achieve improved effectiveness in the supply of its products and in the procurement
of semi-finished steel, and maintain a fluid commercial relationship with its customers by
providing continuous services and assistance.
Terniums revenues are affected by general global trends in the steel industry and more
specifically by the economic conditions in the countries in which it has manufacturing
operations and where its customers are located. Terniums revenues are also impacted by events
that affect the price and availability of raw materials, energy and other inputs needed for
its operations. Furthermore, due to the highly cyclical nature of the steel industry, recent
results may not be indicative of future performance, and historical results may not be
comparable to future results. Investors should not rely on the results of a single period,
particularly a period of peak prices, as an indication of Terniums annual results or future
performance. The variables and trends mentioned below could also affect the results of its
investments in steel related companies. See Item 4. Information on the CompanyB. Business
OverviewOur Business Strategy.
Terniums primary source of revenue is the sale of flat and long steel products. Management
expects sales of flat and long steel products to continue to be Terniums primary source of
revenue. The global market for such steel products is highly competitive, with the primary
competitive factors being price, cost, product quality and customer service. The majority of
Terniums sales are concentrated in the Americas. Specifically, Terniums largest markets are
Mexico, Argentina and Colombia, where its main manufacturing facilities are located.
52
Terniums results are sensitive to economic activity and steel consumption. Terniums results
of operations primarily depend on economic conditions in Mexico and Argentina and, to a lesser
extent, on economic conditions in international and regional markets such as NAFTA, Mercosur
and the Andean Community. Historically, annual steel consumption in the countries where
Ternium operates has varied at a rate that is linked to the annual change in each countrys
gross domestic product and per capita disposable income. The 2008 2009 global economic
downturn resulted in an overall decreased demand for Terniums products. For example, apparent
consumption of finished steel products in Mexico decreased by 1% during 2007 and 4% during
2008, due to subdued industrial activity in the NAFTA region, while in Argentina it increased
3% during 2007 and 4% during 2008, reflecting a sustained activity in the construction and
industrial sectors. During the fourth quarter of 2008, following a steep downturn in the
global economy, apparent demand for steel products fell sharply. As a result, apparent
consumption of finished steel products decreased in 2009 by 15% in Mexico and 33% in
Argentina. This economic downturn had a pronounced negative effect on Terniums business and
results of operations. In 2010, apparent steel consumption increased by 13% in Mexico, due
mainly to the recovery of the industrial sector, and by 43% in Argentina, due to a broad
recovery of economic activity. A protracted global recession or a depression would have a
material adverse effect on the steel industry and Ternium.
Terniums results are also sensitive to prices in the international steel markets. Steel
prices are volatile and are sensitive to trends in cyclical industries, such as the
construction, automotive, appliance and machinery industries, which are significant markets
for Terniums products. Steel prices in the international markets, which had been rising fast
during the first half of 2008, fell sharply beginning in the second half of 2008 as a result
of collapsing apparent demand and the resulting excess capacity in the industry. The fall in
prices during this period adversely affected the results of steel producers generally,
including Ternium, as a result of lower revenues and writedowns of finished steel products and
raw material inventories. For example, in the second half of 2008 Ternium recorded a valuation
allowance in an amount of USD200 million and in the first half of 2009 it recorded an
additional valuation allowance in an amount of USD127.6 million. Beginning in the second half
of 2009, steel prices in the international markets rebounded mainly as a result of the
increase in demand for steel in China and other emerging markets, and the subsidence of the
worldwide de-stocking process. This positive trend in international steel prices partially
reverted during the second half of 2010 as the increase in demand for steel products was more
than offset by new capacity additions and idled capacity restarts. A more balanced market and
the increase in steel demand by year-end 2010 supported a steel price rally during the first
quarter of 2011. Although steel prices decreased during the second quarter of 2011, they
remain at strong levels. Historically, the length and nature of business cycles affecting the
steel industry have been unpredictable. A protracted fall in steel prices would have a material adverse
effect on Terniums results, as could price volatility.
Trends in the steel industry may also have an impact on Terniums results. In addition to
economic conditions and prices, the steel industry is affected by other factors such as
worldwide production capacity and fluctuations in steel imports/exports and tariffs.
Historically, the steel industry has suffered, especially on downturn cycles, from substantial
overcapacity. Currently, as a result of the 2008-2009 economic crisis and from the increase in
steel production capacity in recent years, there are signs of excess capacity in all steel
markets. It is possible that the industrys excess capacity will result in depressed margins
and industry weakness. Furthermore, there has been a trend in recent years toward steel
industry consolidation among Terniums competitors, and smaller competitors in the steel
market today could become larger competitors in the future. Intense competition could cause
Ternium to lose its share in certain markets and adversely affect its sales and revenue.
Terniums production costs are generally sensitive to the international prices of raw
materials, slabs and energy, which reflect supply and demand factors in the global steel
industry. Ternium purchases substantial quantities of raw materials (including iron ore, coal,
ferroalloys and scrap) and slabs for use in the production of its steel products. The
availability and price of these and other inputs vary, sometimes significantly, according to
general market and economic conditions. In addition to raw materials and slabs, natural gas
and electricity are both important components of Terniums cost structure. Ternium generally
purchases these inputs at market or market based prices; accordingly, price fluctuations in
these inputs necessarily impact Terniums production costs.
53
Terniums export revenues could be affected by trade restrictions and its domestic revenues
could be affected by unfair competition from imports. During 2001, a period of strong
oversupply, several antidumping measures were imposed in several countries in which Ternium
operates (including Mexico and Argentina) to prevent foreign steel producers from dumping
certain steel products in local markets. The recovery in global economic conditions since 2003
and strong Chinese demand reduced the previously strong competition in the international
exports markets and, consequently, several countries reduced or eliminated protective measures
established in prior years. However, a number of trade restrictions, both in Terniums local
and export markets, remain in place. In the face of a protacted period of oversupply,
countries may reestablish antidumping duties and/or other safeguards to protect their domestic
markets. Terniums ability to profitably access the export markets may be adversely affected
by trade restrictions, including antidumping duties and countervailing measures, in those
markets. In addition, Terniums ability to sell its products in its principal markets could be
affected by unfair competition from imports of steel products if applicable trade regulations
are not in force.
Prevailing exchange rates have had an impact on Terniums results in the past and could impact
results again in the future. In accordance with IFRS, Terniums subsidiaries in Mexico,
Argentina and Colombia prepare financial statements in their local currencies and record
foreign exchange results on their net non-local currency positions when their local currencies
revaluate or devaluate to other currencies. Accordingly, fluctuations in the local currencies
against the U.S. dollar have had, and may also have in the future, an impact on Terniums
results. In 2008, net foreign exchange result was a loss of USD632.7 million, which was
primarily due to the impact of the Mexican pesos 25% devaluation on Ternium Mexicos U.S.
dollar denominated debt. This non-cash result when measured in U.S. dollars was offset by
changes in Terniums net equity position in the currency translation adjustment, or CTA, line,
as the value of Ternium Mexicos U.S. dollar-denominated debt was not affected by the Mexican
peso fluctuation when stated in U.S. dollar terms in Terniums consolidated financial
statements.
Terniums cash flows for 2009 and 2010 were strongly affected by the non-recurring payments
received in connection with the transfer of our interest in Sidor to Venezuela. On May 7,
2009, we completed the transfer of our entire 59.7% interest in Sidor to CVG. Ternium agreed
to receive an aggregate amount of USD1.97 billion as compensation for its Sidor shares. Of
that amount, CVG paid USD400 million in cash at closing, and the balance was divided in two
tranches: the first tranche of USD945 million to be paid in six equal installments beginning
in August 2009 until November 2010, and the second tranche due in November 2010 and subject to
quarterly mandatory prepayment events based on the increase of the WTI crude oil price over
its May 6, 2009 level. CVG made all payments required to be made under the agreements
governing the transfer of Sidor to Venezuela except for the final payment due on November 8,
2010. On December 18, 2010, Ternium reached an agreement with CVG on the rescheduling of the
unpaid balance, which amounted to USD257 million. As provided in the refinancing agreement,
CVG paid USD7 million to Ternium in January 2011, and CVG is required to pay the remainder in
five quarterly installments, beginning on February 15, 2011 and ending on February 15, 2012.
The first two installments of USD31
million each were paid on February 16 and May 17, 2011. Following the receipt of USD1,790
million in cash payments in the aggregate, the outstanding principal amount of the receivables
with CVG is currently USD187 million. Accordingly, we have significant credit concentration
risk with Venezuela.
Critical Accounting Estimates
This discussion of our operating and financial review and prospects is based on our audited
consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report, which have been
prepared in accordance with IFRS. The use of IFRS has an impact on our critical accounting
policies and estimates.
The preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments
that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and the
related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, management
evaluates its accounting estimates and assumptions, including those related to doubtful
accounts, obsolescence of inventory, impairment of long-term investments, goodwill, and other
assets and contingencies, and revises them when appropriate. Management bases its estimates on
historical experience and on various other assumptions that it believes to be reasonable under
the circumstances. These estimates form the basis for making judgments about the carrying
values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Although
management believes that its estimates and assumptions are reasonable, they are based upon
information available when the estimates and assumptions are made. Actual results may differ
significantly from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Our most critical accounting estimates are those that are most important to the portrayal of
our financial condition and results of operations, and which require us to make our most
difficult and subjective judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates of matters
that are inherently uncertain. Changes in these assumptions and estimates could have a
material impact on our consolidated financial statements. Our most critical accounting
estimates and judgments are set forth below.
54
Useful Lives and Impairment of Property, Plant and Equipment and Other Long-lived Assets
As permitted under IFRS 1First Time Adoption of IFRS, management has elected to use the
fair value of its property, plant and equipment as at January 1, 2003, as its deemed cost.
In determining useful lives, management considered, among others, the following factors: age,
operating condition and level of usage and maintenance. Management conducted visual
inspections for the purpose of (i) determining whether the current conditions of such assets
are consistent with normal conditions of assets of similar age; (ii) confirming that the
operating conditions and levels of usage of such assets are adequate and consistent with their
design; (iii) establishing obsolescence levels; and (iv) estimating life expectancy, all of
which were used in determining useful lives. Management believes, however, that it is possible
that the periods of economic utilization of property, plant and equipment may be different
than the useful lives so determined. Management also believes that this accounting policy
involves a critical accounting estimate because it is subject to change from period to period
as a result of variations in economic conditions and business performance.
When assessing whether an impairment indicator may exist, the Company evaluates both internal
and external sources of information, such as the following:
|
|
|
whether significant changes with an adverse effect on the entity have taken place
during the period, or will take place in the near future, in the technological, market,
economic or legal environment in which the entity operates or in the market to which an
asset is dedicated; |
|
|
|
whether market interest rates or other market rates of return on investments have
increased during the period, and those increases are likely to affect the discount rate
used in calculating an assets value in use and decrease the assets recoverable amount
materially; |
|
|
|
whether the carrying amount of the net assets of the entity is more than its market
capitalization; |
|
|
|
whether evidence is available of obsolescence or physical damage of an asset. |
|
|
|
whether significant changes with an adverse effect on the entity have taken place
during the period, or are expected to take place in the near future, in the extent to
which, or manner in which, an asset is used or is expected to be used.
These changes include the asset becoming idle, plans to discontinue or restructure the
operation to which an asset belongs, plans to dispose of an asset before the previously
expected date, and reassessing the useful life of an asset as finite rather than indefinite;
and |
|
|
|
whether evidence is available from internal reporting that indicates that the
economic performance of an asset is, or will be, worse than expected. |
Management identified the presence of impairment indicators in certain CGUs at December 31,
2008 and, accordingly, carried out impairment tests. These impairment indicators arose mainly
due to recessionary environment and the abrupt decline of demand and prices of steel products.
For the Mexico CGU, management carried out an impairment test for Property, Plant and
Equipment and for other long-lived assets with finite useful lives at December 31, 2008, and
concluded that no impairment was needed. The Company estimated the recoverable amount as the
value in use and compared it to the carrying amount of the corresponding assets (USD3.2
billion at that date). The discount rates used were based on the Mexico CGUs weighted average
cost of capital (WACC), which was 13.4%. Variables considered in forecasts included Mexican
GDP growth rates and correlation with steel demand, level of steel prices, and estimated raw
material costs as observed in industry reports.
For the Argentina CGU, management carried out an impairment test for Property, Plant and
Equipment and for other long-lived assets with finite useful lives at December 31, 2008, and
also concluded that no impairments were required. The Company estimated the recoverable amount
as the value in use and compared it to the carrying amount of the corresponding assets
(USD1.3 billion at that date). The discount rates used were based on the Argentina CGUs WACC,
which was 18.3%. Variables considered in forecasts included Argentinean GDP growth rates and
correlation with steel demand, level of steel prices, and estimated raw material costs as
observed in industry reports.
55
None of Terniums CGUs were tested for impairment in 2010 and 2009, as no impairment
indicators were identified. Furthermore, based on information currently available, management
believes that the recognition of a future impairment charge is not reasonably possible.
Any such impairment charges could have a material adverse effect on Terniums results of
operations, financial condition and net worth.
Under IFRS, assets that have an indefinite useful life are not subject to amortization and are
tested annually for impairment. An impairment loss is recognized for the amount by which the
assets carrying amount exceeds its recoverable amount. The recoverable amount is the higher
of an assets fair value less cost to sell and the value in use. For purposes of assessing
impairment, assets are grouped at the lowest level for which there are separately identifiable
cash flows (cash-generating units).
At December 31, 2009, an impairment loss over the intangible asset booked in connection with
the slab purchase agreement with Corus was recorded for the amount of USD27 million. For more
information see Item 8. Financial InformationA. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial
InformationLegal ProceedingsPreviously Reported Legal Proceedings and note 27 to our
consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report.
No other impairment losses were recorded from the impairment tests performed.
Impairment and recoverability of goodwill and
other assets, including identifiable intangible assets
Assessment
of the recoverability of the carrying value of goodwill and other
assets, including identifiable intangible assets, require
significant judgment. We evaluate goodwill allocated to the operating units for impairment on
an annual basis.
Goodwill is tested at the level of the cash generating units, or CGU. Impairment testing of
the CGU is carried out and the value in use determined in accordance with the discounted cash
flow method. In order to perform the test, we use projections for the next five years based on
past performance and expectations of market development. After the fifth year a perpetuity
rate with no growth increase is utilized. The discount rates used for these tests are based on
our weighted average cost of capital adjusted for specific country and currency risks
associated with the cash flow
projections. As of December 31, 2010, the discount rate used to test goodwill allocated to the
Mexico CGU for impairment was 11.4%.
The impairment tests performed as of December 31, 2010, resulted in no impairment charge.
Although we believe our estimates and projections are appropriate based on currently available
information, the actual operating performance of an asset or group of assets which has been
tested for impairment may be significantly different from current expectations. In such an
event, the carrying value of goodwill, investments in associated companies and deferred taxes
may be required to be reduced from the amounts currently recorded. Any such reductions may
materially affect asset values and results of operations.
Allowances for Doubtful Accounts
Management makes estimates of the uncollectibility of our accounts receivable. Management
analyzes our trade accounts receivable on a regular basis and, when aware of a third partys
inability to meet its financial commitments to us, management impairs the amounts due by means
of a charge to the allowance for doubtful accounts.
Management specifically analyzes accounts receivable and historical bad debts, customer
creditworthiness, current economic trends and changes in customer payment terms when
evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts.
Allowances for doubtful accounts are adjusted periodically in accordance with the aging of
overdue accounts. For this purpose, trade accounts receivable overdue by more than 90 days,
and which are not covered by a credit collateral, guarantee or similar surety, are fully
provisioned. As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, the allowance for doubtful accounts totaled
USD17.2 million and USD16.7 million, respectively.
56
Historically, losses due to credit failures, aging of overdue accounts and customer claims
have been within expectations and in line with the provisions established. If, however,
circumstances were to materially change (e.g., higher than expected defaults), managements
estimates of the recoverability of amounts due to us could be materially reduced and our
results of operations, financial condition and net worth could be materially and adversely
affected.
Allowance for Obsolescence of Supplies and Spare Parts, Inventorys Net Realizable Value and
Slow-Moving Inventory
Management assesses the recoverability of its inventories considering their selling prices, if
the inventories are damaged, or if they have become wholly or partially obsolete. Net
realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less the
costs of completion and selling expenses.
Ternium establishes an allowance for obsolete or slow-moving inventory in connection with
finished goods and goods in process. The allowance for slow-moving inventory is recognized for
finished goods and goods in process based on managements analysis of their aging. In
connection with supplies and spare parts the calculation is based on managements analysis of
their aging, the capacity of such materials to be used based on their levels of preservation
and maintenance, and the potential obsolescence due to technological change.
There was no allowance for net realizable value as of December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
The allowance for obsolescence as of December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 amounted to
USD68.2 million and USD58.2 million, respectively.
Historically, losses due to obsolescence and scrapping of inventory have been within
expectations and the provisions established. If, however, circumstances were to materially
change (e.g., significant changes in market conditions or in the technology used in the
mills), managements estimates of the recoverability of these inventories could be materially
reduced and our results of operations, financial condition and net worth could be materially
and adversely affected.
During
2010, no charges were recorded to the net realizable value allowance.
Charges to mark the inventory to net realizable value in 2009 and 2008 were USD127.6 million
and USD200.0 million, respectively. Of these amounts, USD82.8 million in 2009 and USD179.6
million in 2008 corresponded to inventories for shipments to
North America region, while USD44.8 million in 2009 and USD20.4 million in 2008 corresponded
to inventories for exports within the South and Central America region.
The additions to the allowance for net realizable value recorded during 2009 and 2008
resulted from the steep fall of steel prices as a result of the global financial crisis that
began in 2008. Beginning in the second half of 2008 up to the first half of 2009 average
prices of flat steel products decreased 41%. Accordingly, inventory values were compared to
their estimated net selling prices and written down when the selling prices were lower than
historical costs. This was the case of inventories produced from third-party slabs in Mexico
and certain raw materials in Argentina that had been acquired at market prices in force prior
to the beginning of the global financial crisis.
Loss Contingencies
We are subject to various claims, lawsuits and other legal proceedings that arise in the
ordinary course of our business, including customer claims in which a third party is seeking
reimbursement or indemnity. Our liability with respect to such claims, lawsuits and other
legal proceedings cannot be estimated with certainty. Periodically, management reviews the
status of each significant matter and assesses potential financial exposure. If the potential
loss from the claim or proceeding is considered probable and the amount can be reasonably
estimated, a liability is recorded. Management estimates the amount of such liability based on
the information available and the assumptions and methods it has concluded are appropriate, in
accordance with the provisions of IFRS. Accruals for such contingencies reflect a reasonable
estimate of the losses to be incurred based on information available, including the relevant
litigation or settlement strategy, as of the date of preparation of the applicable financial
statement. As additional information becomes available, management will reassess its
evaluation of the pending claims, lawsuits and other proceedings and revise its estimates.
57
With respect to the loss contingencies described in our financial statements, we do not expect
to incur any losses exceeding the amounts accrued as of December 31, 2010, that would be
material relative to our consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity
as of such date. However, if reserves prove to be inadequate and we incur a charge to
earnings, such charge could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations,
financial condition and net worth.
The loss contingencies provision amounts to USD16.1 million and USD18.9 million as of December
31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Valuation Allowance of Deferred Tax Assets
Management calculates current and deferred income taxes according to the tax laws applicable
to our subsidiaries in the countries in which such subsidiaries operate. However, certain
adjustments necessary to determine the income tax provision are finalized only after the
financial statements are issued. In cases in which the final tax outcome is different from the
amounts that were initially recorded, such differences will impact the income tax and deferred
tax provisions in the period in which such determination is made. When assessing the
recoverability of deferred tax assets, management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred
tax liabilities, projected future taxable income and tax planning strategies. As of December
31, 2010, the recognized tax losses amounted to USD22.2 million and the net unrecognized
deferred tax assets amounted to USD22.3 million. According to the tax law in force in the
jurisdictions in which the tax losses are generated, these amounts do not have a certain
expiration date.
Although we believe our estimates are appropriate, significant differences in actual
performance of the asset or group of assets may materially affect our asset values and results
of operation.
Sidor Financial Asset
As further described in note 29 to our audited consolidated financial statements included
elsewhere in this annual report, on May 7, 2009, Ternium reached an agreement with CVG for the
transfer of its entire 59.7% interest in Sidor in exchange for an aggregate amount of USD1.97
billion, out of which USD400 million were paid in cash on that date. The initial measurement
of the receivable and its subsequent measurements until November 8, 2010, were performed on
the basis of its discounted amount using an annual discount rate of 14.4%. This discount rate
was estimated on the basis of the yield (13.3%) of Venezuelan sovereign debt with maturities
similar to that of the receivable held by Ternium against CVG; however, as the Venezuelan
sovereign debt with similar maturities was governed by New York law, while the receivable with
CVG was governed by Venezuelan law, the discount rate was further adjusted to
adequately reflect the specific risk of Terniums receivable. After the rescheduling of the
last unpaid installment agreed on December 18, 2010, the annual discount rate used to measure
the receivable was estimated at 6.3%, on the basis of the specific risks associated to the
third-party promissory notes received as guarantee for full payment of CVG obligations.
58
|
A. |
|
Results of Operations |
|
|
|
|
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are
based on our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual
report. Accordingly, this discussion and analysis present our financial condition and results
of operations on a consolidated basis. See Presentation of Certain Financial and Other
InformationAccounting Principles and notes 2 and 4 to our audited consolidated financial
statements included elsewhere in this annual report. The following discussion should be read
in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and the related notes
included elsewhere in this annual report. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands of U.S. dollars |
|
For the year ended December 31, |
|
(except number of shares and per share data) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Selected consolidated income statement data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
|
7,382,004 |
|
|
|
4,958,983 |
|
|
|
8,464,885 |
|
|
|
5,633,366 |
|
|
|
4,484,918 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
(5,665,254 |
) |
|
|
(4,110,370 |
) |
|
|
(6,128,027 |
) |
|
|
(4,287,671 |
) |
|
|
(3,107,629 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
1,716,750 |
|
|
|
848,613 |
|
|
|
2,336,858 |
|
|
|
1,345,695 |
|
|
|
1,377,289 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
(665,306 |
) |
|
|
(531,530 |
) |
|
|
(669,473 |
) |
|
|
(517,433 |
) |
|
|
(370,727 |
) |
Other operating income (expenses), net |
|
|
2,493 |
|
|
|
(20,700 |
) |
|
|
8,662 |
|
|
|
8,514 |
|
|
|
(4,739 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
1,053,937 |
|
|
|
296,383 |
|
|
|
1,676,047 |
|
|
|
836,776 |
|
|
|
1,001,823 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(72,969 |
) |
|
|
(105,810 |
) |
|
|
(136,111 |
) |
|
|
(133,109 |
) |
|
|
(96,814 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
27,347 |
|
|
|
21,141 |
|
|
|
32,178 |
|
|
|
41,613 |
|
|
|
33,903 |
|
Interest income Sidor financial asset |
|
|
61,012 |
|
|
|
135,952 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other financial income (expenses), net |
|
|
115,112 |
|
|
|
81,639 |
|
|
|
(693,192 |
) |
|
|
(38,498 |
) |
|
|
(40,432 |
) |
Equity in earnings of associated companies |
|
|
1,688 |
|
|
|
1,110 |
|
|
|
1,851 |
|
|
|
434 |
|
|
|
671 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax expense |
|
|
1,186,127 |
|
|
|
430,415 |
|
|
|
880,773 |
|
|
|
707,216 |
|
|
|
899,151 |
|
Income tax (expense) benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current and deferred income tax expense |
|
|
(406,657 |
) |
|
|
(91,314 |
) |
|
|
(258,969 |
) |
|
|
(291,345 |
) |
|
|
(353,044 |
) |
Reversal of deferred statutory profit sharing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96,265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
779,470 |
|
|
|
339,101 |
|
|
|
718,069 |
|
|
|
415,871 |
|
|
|
546,107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
428,023 |
|
|
|
157,095 |
|
|
|
579,925 |
|
|
|
444,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit for the year (1) |
|
|
779,470 |
|
|
|
767,124 |
|
|
|
875,164 |
|
|
|
995,796 |
|
|
|
990,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity holders of the Company |
|
|
622,076 |
|
|
|
717,400 |
|
|
|
715,418 |
|
|
|
784,490 |
|
|
|
795,424 |
|
Non-controlling interest |
|
|
157,394 |
|
|
|
49,724 |
|
|
|
159,746 |
|
|
|
211,306 |
|
|
|
195,151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
779,470 |
|
|
|
767,124 |
|
|
|
875,164 |
|
|
|
995,796 |
|
|
|
990,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
383,300 |
|
|
|
385,105 |
|
|
|
413,541 |
|
|
|
355,271 |
|
|
|
251,371 |
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding |
|
|
2,004,743,442 |
|
|
|
2,004,743,442 |
|
|
|
2,004,743,442 |
|
|
|
2,004,743,442 |
|
|
|
1,936,833,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share (expressed in USD per
share) for profit: (1) (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From continuing operations attributable to
the equity holders of the Company |
|
|
0.31 |
|
|
|
0.15 |
|
|
|
0.27 |
|
|
|
0.15 |
|
|
|
0.20 |
|
From discontinued operations attributable to the
equity holders of the Company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.21 |
|
|
|
0.09 |
|
|
|
0.24 |
|
|
|
0.21 |
|
For the year attributable to the equity holders
of the Company |
|
|
0.31 |
|
|
|
0.36 |
|
|
|
0.36 |
|
|
|
0.39 |
|
|
|
0.41 |
|
Dividends per share declared |
|
|
0.075 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
International Accounting Standard N° 1 (IAS 1) (Revised) requires that income for the
year as shown in the income statement includes the portion attributable to non-controlling
interest. Basic earnings per share, however, continue to be calculated on the basis of
income attributable solely to the equity holders of the Company. |
|
(2) |
|
Diluted earnings per share (expressed in USD per share), equals basic earnings per
share. Diluted earnings per share have been calculated giving effect to the conversion of
certain subordinated convertible loans. |
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands U.S. dollars |
|
|
|
(except number of shares and per |
|
At December 31, |
|
share data) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Selected consolidated balance
sheet data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current assets |
|
|
5,579,438 |
|
|
|
5,250,135 |
|
|
|
5,491,408 |
|
|
|
8,553,123 |
|
|
|
6,029,383 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
4,262,896 |
|
|
|
4,040,415 |
|
|
|
4,212,313 |
|
|
|
6,776,630 |
|
|
|
5,335,030 |
|
Other non-current assets (1) |
|
|
1,316,542 |
|
|
|
1,209,720 |
|
|
|
1,279,095 |
|
|
|
1,776,493 |
|
|
|
694,353 |
|
Current assets |
|
|
5,532,893 |
|
|
|
5,042,538 |
|
|
|
5,179,839 |
|
|
|
5,095,959 |
|
|
|
2,628,870 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
1,779,416 |
|
|
|
2,095,798 |
|
|
|
1,065,552 |
|
|
|
1,125,830 |
|
|
|
643,291 |
|
Other current assets (2) |
|
|
3,743,516 |
|
|
|
2,937,494 |
|
|
|
4,108,954 |
|
|
|
3,200,987 |
|
|
|
1,978,537 |
|
Non-current assets classified as
held for sale |
|
|
9,961 |
|
|
|
9,246 |
|
|
|
5,333 |
|
|
|
769,142 |
|
|
|
7,042 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
11,112,331 |
|
|
|
10,292,673 |
|
|
|
10,671,247 |
|
|
|
13,649,082 |
|
|
|
8,658,253 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital and reserves attributable
to the Companys equity holders
(3) |
|
|
5,880,740 |
|
|
|
5,296,342 |
|
|
|
4,597,370 |
|
|
|
4,452,680 |
|
|
|
3,757,558 |
|
Non-controlling interest |
|
|
1,135,361 |
|
|
|
964,897 |
|
|
|
964,094 |
|
|
|
1,805,243 |
|
|
|
1,626,119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current liabilities |
|
|
2,540,594 |
|
|
|
2,872,667 |
|
|
|
3,374,964 |
|
|
|
5,401,549 |
|
|
|
1,867,892 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings |
|
|
1,426,574 |
|
|
|
1,787,204 |
|
|
|
2,325,867 |
|
|
|
3,676,072 |
|
|
|
546,601 |
|
Deferred income tax |
|
|
877,742 |
|
|
|
857,297 |
|
|
|
810,160 |
|
|
|
1,327,768 |
|
|
|
982,091 |
|
Other non-current liabilities |
|
|
236,278 |
|
|
|
228,166 |
|
|
|
238,937 |
|
|
|
397,709 |
|
|
|
339,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
1,555,636 |
|
|
|
1,158,767 |
|
|
|
1,734,819 |
|
|
|
1,989,610 |
|
|
|
1,406,684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings |
|
|
513,083 |
|
|
|
539,525 |
|
|
|
941,460 |
|
|
|
406,239 |
|
|
|
507,241 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
1,042,553 |
|
|
|
619,242 |
|
|
|
793,359 |
|
|
|
1,369,608 |
|
|
|
899,443 |
|
Liabilities directly associated
with non-current assets
classified as held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
213,763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
4,096,230 |
|
|
|
4,031,434 |
|
|
|
5,109,783 |
|
|
|
7,391,159 |
|
|
|
3,274,576 |
|
Total equity and liabilities |
|
|
11,112,331 |
|
|
|
10,292,673 |
|
|
|
10,671,247 |
|
|
|
13,649,082 |
|
|
|
8,658,253 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of shares outstanding |
|
|
2,004,743,442 |
|
|
|
2,004,743,442 |
|
|
|
2,004,743,442 |
|
|
|
2,004,743,442 |
|
|
|
2,004,743,442 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As of December 31, 2010, 2009, 2008, 2007 and 2006, includes goodwill mainly related
to the acquisition of our Mexican subsidiaries for a total amount of USD750.1, USD708.6,
USD683.7, USD850.7 and USD397.9 million, respectively. |
|
(2) |
|
As of December 31, 2010, 2009, 2008 and 2007, includes deposits with maturity of more
than three months for a total amount of USD848.4, USD46.8, USD90.0 and USD65.3 million,
respectively. |
|
(3) |
|
The Companys share capital as of December 31, 2010, 2009, 2008, 2007 and 2006 was
represented by 2,004,743,442 shares, par value USD1.00 per share, for a total amount of
USD2,004.7 million. |
The following table sets forth our operating and other costs and expenses as a
percentage of net sales for the years indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31, |
|
Percentage of net sales |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Cost of sales |
|
|
(76.7 |
)% |
|
|
(82.9 |
)% |
|
|
(72.4 |
)% |
|
|
(76.1 |
)% |
|
|
(69.3 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
23.3 |
% |
|
|
17.1 |
% |
|
|
27.6 |
% |
|
|
23.9 |
% |
|
|
30.7 |
% |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
(9.0 |
)% |
|
|
(10.7 |
)% |
|
|
(7.9 |
)% |
|
|
(9.2 |
)% |
|
|
(8.3 |
)% |
Other operating income (expenses), net |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
(0.4 |
)% |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
(0.1 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
14.3 |
% |
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
|
19.8 |
% |
|
|
14.9 |
% |
|
|
22.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(1.0 |
)% |
|
|
(2.1 |
)% |
|
|
(1.6 |
)% |
|
|
(2.4 |
)% |
|
|
(2.2 |
)% |
Interest income |
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
0.8 |
% |
Interest income Sidor financial asset |
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
2.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other financial income (expense), net |
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
|
(8.2 |
)% |
|
|
(0.7 |
)% |
|
|
(0.9) |
% |
Equity in earnings of associated companies |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax expense |
|
|
16.1 |
% |
|
|
8.7 |
% |
|
|
10.4 |
% |
|
|
12.6 |
% |
|
|
20.0 |
% |
Income tax expense |
|
|
(5.5 |
)% |
|
|
(1.8 |
)% |
|
|
(1.9 |
)% |
|
|
(5.3 |
)% |
|
|
(7.8 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
10.6 |
% |
|
|
6.8 |
% |
|
|
8.5 |
% |
|
|
7.4 |
% |
|
|
12.2 |
% |
Discontinued Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.6 |
% |
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
|
10.3 |
% |
|
|
9.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit for the year |
|
|
10.6 |
% |
|
|
15.5 |
% |
|
|
10.3 |
% |
|
|
17.7 |
% |
|
|
22.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity holders of the Company |
|
|
8.4 |
% |
|
|
14.5 |
% |
|
|
8.5 |
% |
|
|
13.9 |
% |
|
|
17.7 |
% |
Non-controlling interest |
|
|
2.1 |
% |
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
4.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2010 compared to Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2009
Overview
Terniums operating income in 2010 was USD1.1 billion, compared to USD296.4 million in 2009,
and shows a recovery from the 2009 global economic downturn, with higher sales volumes and
improved margins. The improvement was mainly due to a USD137 increase in revenue per ton and
a 1.7 million ton increase in shipments, partially offset by a USD57 increase in operating
cost per ton1. Net income was USD779.5 million in 2010, compared to USD767.1
million in 2009. Although the net income variation was slight in nominal terms, the drivers
for net income in each of these years were significantly different. There were no discontinued
operations results in 2010, whereas there was a USD428.0 million discontinued operations gain
in 2009 related to the transfer of the Sidor shares to Venezuela. The year-over-year change
in net income also included the above mentioned USD757.6 million increase in operating income
and a USD315.3 million increase in income tax expense.
In 2010, steel consumption in the North American market increased 31% year-over-year. The
economies in the NAFTA region expanded gradually during the year with a 4.0% GDP growth in
Mexico and a 2.9% GDP growth in the U.S. Mexican export-oriented industries were particularly
favored by the recovery of the economic activity in the United States. In contrast, the
construction sector in the country remained subdued during most of 2010 and only showed
evidence of improvement by year-end.
Likewise, the steel markets in Central and South America showed an estimated 28%
year-over-year increase in apparent steel use during 2010. The economic activity in the
region expanded during 2010, including a 7.5% GDP growth in Argentina and a 4.7% GDP growth in
Colombia. Construction activity in the region returned to solid growth rates and the
automotive sector, which was among the most affected sectors in 2009, significantly expanded
in 2010.
Net Sales
Net sales in 2010 were USD7.4 billion, 49% higher than net sales in 2009. Shipments of flat
and long products were 8.1 million tons in 2010, up 27% compared to shipments in 2009.
Revenue per ton shipped was USD895 in 2010, an 18% increase compared to 2009, mainly as a
result of higher prices.
The following table shows Terniums total consolidated net sales, shipments and revenue by
product and geographical region for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales (million USD) |
|
|
Shipments (thousand tons) |
|
|
Revenue / ton (USD/ton) |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Dif. |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Dif. |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Dif. |
|
North America |
|
|
3,464.9 |
|
|
|
2,371.9 |
|
|
|
46 |
% |
|
|
3,852.1 |
|
|
|
3,114.5 |
|
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
899 |
|
|
|
762 |
|
|
|
18 |
% |
South & Central America |
|
|
2,886.2 |
|
|
|
1,717.1 |
|
|
|
68 |
% |
|
|
2,877.0 |
|
|
|
1,903.6 |
|
|
|
51 |
% |
|
|
1,003 |
|
|
|
902 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
Europe & other |
|
|
25.3 |
|
|
|
161.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42.6 |
|
|
|
287.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
594 |
|
|
|
561 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total flat products |
|
|
6,376.4 |
|
|
|
4,250.0 |
|
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
6,771.7 |
|
|
|
5,305.2 |
|
|
|
28 |
% |
|
|
942 |
|
|
|
801 |
|
|
|
18 |
% |
North America |
|
|
640.7 |
|
|
|
512.0 |
|
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
974.2 |
|
|
|
931.2 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
658 |
|
|
|
550 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
South & Central America |
|
|
163.9 |
|
|
|
57.3 |
|
|
|
186 |
% |
|
|
258.7 |
|
|
|
118.4 |
|
|
|
118 |
% |
|
|
634 |
|
|
|
484 |
|
|
|
31 |
% |
Europe & other |
|
|
28.6 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
571 |
|
|
|
583 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total long products |
|
|
833.1 |
|
|
|
572.9 |
|
|
|
45 |
% |
|
|
1,282.9 |
|
|
|
1,055.6 |
|
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
649 |
|
|
|
543 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
Total flat and long products |
|
|
7,209.5 |
|
|
|
4,822.9 |
|
|
|
49 |
% |
|
|
8,054.6 |
|
|
|
6,360.8 |
|
|
|
27 |
% |
|
|
895 |
|
|
|
758 |
|
|
|
18 |
% |
Other products (1) |
|
|
172.5 |
|
|
|
136.1 |
|
|
|
27 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Net Sales |
|
|
7,382.0 |
|
|
|
4,959.0 |
|
|
|
49 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Primarily includes iron ore, pig iron and pre-engineered metal buildings. |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Operating cost per ton is equal to cost of sales plus selling, general and administrative expenses, divided by shipments. |
61
Sales of flat products in 2010 totaled USD6.4 billion, a 50% increase compared to 2009.
Net sales increased as a result of higher shipments and revenue per ton. Shipments of flat
products totaled 6.8 million tons in 2010, an increase of 28% compared to 2009 mainly due to a
recovery from the 2009 global economic downturn. Revenue per ton shipped increased 18% to
USD942 in 2010 compared with 2009, mainly due to higher steel prices in Terniums main steel
markets.
Sales of long products were USD833.1 million in 2010, an increase of 45% compared to 2009,
mainly due to higher volumes and prices. Shipments of long products totaled 1.3 million tons
in 2010, a 22% increase versus 2009. Revenue per ton shipped was USD649 in 2010, an increase
of 20% compared to 2009 due to higher prices.
Sales of other products totaled USD172.5 million in 2010, compared to USD136.1 million during
2009, an increase of 27%. The increase includes the impact of higher iron ore prices.
Sales of flat and long products in the North America Region were USD4.1 billion in 2010, an
increase of 42% versus 2009 due to higher shipments and prices. Shipments in the region
totaled 4.8 million tons in 2010, or 19% higher than 2009, as a result of higher demand.
Revenue per ton in the North Region increased 19% to USD851 in 2010 over 2009, mainly due to
higher prices.
Flat and long product sales in the South & Central America Region were USD3.1 billion in 2010,
an increase of 72% versus 2009, due to higher shipments and prices. Shipments in the region
totaled 3.1 million tons in 2010, or 55% higher than in 2009, mainly due to a recovery from
the 2009 global economic downturn. Revenue per ton shipped was USD973 in 2010, an increase of
11% compared to 2009.
Cost of sales
Cost of sales was USD5.7 billion in 2010 compared to USD4.1 billion in 2009. Cost of sales
increased mainly as a result of higher shipments and higher cost per ton. Cost per ton in
2010 increased compared to 2009 mainly due to higher raw material and purchased slab prices,
as well as higher labor, services and maintenance costs.
Selling, general and administrative expenses
Selling, General and Administrative (SG&A) expenses in 2010 were USD665.3 million, or 9% of
net sales, compared with USD531.5 million, or 11% of net sales, in 2009. The USD133.8 million
increase in SG&A was mainly due to higher freight expenses and taxes related to higher
activity levels, higher labor costs and the impact of the consolidation of Ferrasa on August
25, 2010, partially offset by lower personnel reduction charges.
Other operating income (expenses), net
Net other operating income in 2010 was USD2.5 million, compared with net other operating
expenses of USD20.7 million in 2009. The year-over-year difference was mainly due to a USD27.0
million full impairment in 2009 of the remaining intangible asset value of a contract related
to the purchase of steel slabs from Corus Teeside facility. For more information, see note 27
to our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report and
Item 8. Financial InformationA. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial
InformationLegal ProceedingsPreviously Reported Legal Proceedings.
Operating income
Operating income in 2010 was USD1.1 billion, or 14% of net sales, compared to an operating
income of USD296.4 million, or 6% of net sales, in 2009.
Net financial results
Net financial results were a USD130.5 million gain in 2010, compared with a USD132.9 million
gain in 2009.
In 2010, Terniums net interest expenses were USD45.6 million, compared to a net interest
expense of USD84.7 million in 2009, mainly as a result of lower net indebtedness and cost of
debt.
62
Net foreign exchange result was a gain of USD123.7 million in 2010 compared to a gain of
USD83.1 million in 2009. The gain in 2010 was primarily due to the impact of the Mexican
Pesos 5.4% revaluation on Terniums Mexican subsidiarys U.S. dollar denominated debt. This
result is non-cash when measured in U.S. dollars and is offset by changes in Terniums net
equity position in the currency translation adjustments line, as the value of Ternium Mexicos
U.S. dollar denominated debt is not altered by the Mexican Pesos fluctuations when stated in
U.S. dollars in Terniums consolidated financial statements. In accordance with IFRS, Ternium
Mexico prepares its financial statements in Mexican Pesos and registers foreign exchange
results on its net non-Mexican Peso positions when the Mexican Peso revaluates or devaluates
relative to other currencies.
Interest income on the Sidor financial asset was USD61.0 million in 2010, compared to USD136.0
million in 2009. These results are attributable to the Sidor financial asset in connection
with the transfer of Sidor shares on May 7, 2009.
Equity in earnings (losses) of associated companies
Terniums share in the results of associated companies (mainly Exiros) during 2010 was a gain
of USD1.7 million, compared to a gain of USD1.1 million in 2009.
Income tax expense
Income tax expense for 2010 was USD406.7 million, or 34% of income before income tax and
non-controlling interest, compared with an income tax expense of USD91.3 million in 2009 or
21% of income before income tax and non-controlling interest. The 2009 result included a
non-recurring gain of USD35.4 million due to a favorable resolution on a tax-related dispute
in México. In addition, Mexican statutory tax rate was raised from 28% in 2009 to
30% in 2010. For additional information regarding changes in Mexican tax system, see Item 3. Key InformationD. Risk FactorsRisks Relating to the Countries in Which We OperateMexico.
Net result of discontinued operations
There were no results of discontinued operations in 2010, while 2009 included a USD428.0
million gain in connection with the transfer of Sidor shares on May 7, 2009.
Net income attributable to non-controlling interest
Income attributable to non-controlling interest in 2010 was USD157.4 million, higher than
income attributable to non-controlling interest of USD49.7 million in 2009, mainly due to a
higher result attributable to non-controlling interest in Siderar and Ternium Mexico.
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2009 compared to Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2008
Overview
Terniums operating income in 2009 was USD296.4 million, an 82% decrease compared to operating
income in 2008. The 2008 2009 global economic downturn resulted in a sharp decline in
demand in the main steel consumer sectors of Terniums core markets during the second half of
2008 and led to subdued shipments levels in 2009. Shipments began to improve gradually only
in the second half of 2009. As a result, Terniums shipments in 2009 decreased by 1.2 million
tons year-over-year and revenue per ton decreased USD329, leading to a 41% drop in net sales
that was partially offset by a USD164 decrease in operating cost per ton.
Net income during 2009 decreased to USD767.1 million, from USD875.2 million in 2008, mainly as
a result of a USD1.4 billion decrease in operating income, partially offset by a USD715.8
million increase in non-cash net foreign exchange results (offset by changes in Terniums net
equity position in the currency translation adjustments line) and a USD564.0 million gain
related to the transfer of the Sidor shares to Venezuela.
63
During 2009 steel consumption in the North American market decreased 37% year-over-year. The
economies in the North America Region contracted in 2009, particularly the Mexican economy
which, in addition to the downturn in the United States, was affected by a sharp depreciation
of the Mexican Peso vis-à-vis other currencies during 2008. The entire NAFTA region suffered a reduction
in steel consumption rates that not only reflected a decrease in end user demand from steel
consuming sectors but also a significant de-stocking process in the steel value chain,
particularly during the first half of the year. Likewise, the steel markets in Central and
South America showed an estimated 24% decrease in apparent steel use during 2009, well above
the decrease recorded by key steel consuming sectors, an evidence of the size of the
de-stocking in the steel industrys value chain. Countries neighboring Argentina, the natural
export markets for Ternium in that geographic area, stagnated or contracted in 2009, recording
GDP growth rates of between 1% and minus 3% year-over-year. Argentina, the main market for
Ternium in South America, showed an estimated 33% decrease in steel consumption, due to the
combination of lower economic activity and relatively high inventories in the steel industrys
value chain early in 2009. The markets in Central and South America experienced the effects
of the global slowdown with some delay.
Net Sales
Net sales for 2009 decreased 41% to USD5.0 billion, compared to 2008. Net sales decreased due
to lower shipments and lower revenue per ton. Shipments of flat and long products were 6.4
million tons during 2009, a decrease of 16% compared to 2008, due to lower shipments in
Terniums core markets as a result of the effects of the global economic downturn. Revenue
per ton shipped was USD758 in 2009, a decrease of 30% when compared to 2008, mainly as a
result of lower prices in all of Terniums markets.
The following table shows Terniums total consolidated net sales, shipments and revenue by
product and geographical region for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales (million US$) |
|
|
Shipments (thousand tons) |
|
|
Revenue / ton (US$/ton) |
|
|
|
Year 2009 |
|
|
Year 2008 |
|
|
Dif. |
|
|
Year 2009 |
|
|
Year 2008 |
|
|
Dif. |
|
|
Year 2009 |
|
|
Year 2008 |
|
|
Dif. |
|
North America |
|
|
2,371.9 |
|
|
|
4,294.7 |
|
|
|
-45 |
% |
|
|
3,114.5 |
|
|
|
3,666.1 |
|
|
|
-15 |
% |
|
|
762 |
|
|
|
1,171 |
|
|
|
-35 |
% |
South & Central America |
|
|
1,717.1 |
|
|
|
2,782.5 |
|
|
|
-38 |
% |
|
|
1,903.6 |
|
|
|
2,604.2 |
|
|
|
-27 |
% |
|
|
902 |
|
|
|
1,068 |
|
|
|
-16 |
% |
Europe & other |
|
|
161.0 |
|
|
|
47.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
287.0 |
|
|
|
55.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
561 |
|
|
|
860 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total flat products |
|
|
4,250.0 |
|
|
|
7,124.7 |
|
|
|
-40 |
% |
|
|
5,305.2 |
|
|
|
6,325.5 |
|
|
|
-16 |
% |
|
|
801 |
|
|
|
1,126 |
|
|
|
-29 |
% |
North America |
|
|
512.0 |
|
|
|
791.8 |
|
|
|
-35 |
% |
|
|
931.2 |
|
|
|
901.3 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
550 |
|
|
|
878 |
|
|
|
-37 |
% |
South & Central America |
|
|
57.3 |
|
|
|
274.4 |
|
|
|
-79 |
% |
|
|
118.4 |
|
|
|
302.5 |
|
|
|
-61 |
% |
|
|
484 |
|
|
|
907 |
|
|
|
-47 |
% |
Europe & other |
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
13.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
583 |
|
|
|
669 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total long products |
|
|
572.9 |
|
|
|
1,075.1 |
|
|
|
-47 |
% |
|
|
1,055.6 |
|
|
|
1,217.2 |
|
|
|
-13 |
% |
|
|
543 |
|
|
|
883 |
|
|
|
-39 |
% |
Total flat and long products |
|
|
4,822.9 |
|
|
|
8,199.8 |
|
|
|
-41 |
% |
|
|
6,360.8 |
|
|
|
7,542.7 |
|
|
|
-16 |
% |
|
|
758 |
|
|
|
1,087 |
|
|
|
-30 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other products (1) |
|
|
136.1 |
|
|
|
265.1 |
|
|
|
-49 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Net Sales |
|
|
4,959.0 |
|
|
|
8,464.9 |
|
|
|
-41 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Primarily includes iron ore, pig iron and pre-engineered metal
buildings. |
Sales of flat products during 2009 were USD4.3 billion, a decrease of 40% compared to
2008. Net sales decreased as a result of lower shipments and revenue per ton. Shipments of
flat products were 5.3 million tons in 2009, a decrease of 16% compared with 2008, mainly due
to lower shipments in the South & Central America and the North America regions, partially
offset by higher shipments in the Europe and other Region. Revenue per ton decreased 29% to
USD801 in 2009 compared to 2008, as a result of lower steel prices.
Sales of long products were USD572.9 million during 2009, a decrease of 47% compared to 2008
due to lower revenue per ton and shipments. Revenue per ton was USD543 in 2009, a decrease of
39% compared to 2008 as a result of lower prices. Shipments of long products were 1.1 million
tons in 2009, a 13% decrease versus 2008, mainly due to lower billet shipments in the South &
Central America Region partially offset by higher bar shipments in the North America Region.
Sales of other products were USD136.1 million during 2009, compared to USD265.1 million during
2008. The decrease was mainly driven by lower iron ore shipments and prices and lower sales
of pre-engineered metal buildings.
Sales of flat and long products in the North America Region totaled USD2.9 billion in 2009, a
decrease of 43% versus 2008, mainly due to the effect of lower shipments and prices.
Shipments in the region totaled 4.0 million tons during 2009, or 11% lower than during 2008.
Revenue per ton shipped was USD713 in 2009, a decrease of 36% compared to 2008, as a result of
lower prices.
64
Flat and long product sales in the South & Central America Region were USD1.8 billion during
2009, a decrease of 42% versus 2008. This decrease was due to lower volumes and revenue per
ton. Shipments in the region totaled 2.0 million tons during 2009, or 30% lower than in 2008.
Revenue per ton shipped in the South & Central America Region was USD878 in 2009, a decrease
of 17% compared to 2008, mainly due to lower prices.
Cost of sales
Cost of sales was USD4.1 billion in 2009 compared to USD6.1 billion in 2008. Cost of sales
decreased as a result of lower shipments and lower cost per ton. Cost per ton decreased
year-over-over mainly as a result of lower costs for third party steel, raw materials, energy,
labor and services, as well as on account of the impact on costs of the Mexican Pesos and
Argentine Pesos devaluation versus the U.S. dollar and the initiatives Ternium launched to
mitigate the global economic downturn.
Selling, general and administrative expenses
SG&A expenses in 2009 were USD531.5 million, or 11% of net sales, compared with USD669.5
million, or 8% of net sales, in 2008. The decrease in SG&A was due mainly to Terniums
efforts to reduce headcount and services costs in response to the economic downturn, as well
as on account of lower freight volumes, tax charges and the impact on costs of the Mexican
Pesos and Argentine Pesos devaluation versus the U.S. dollar.
Other operating (expenses) income, net
Net other operating expenses in 2009 were USD20.7 million, compared with net other operating
income of USD8.7 million in 2008. The year-over-year difference was mainly due to a USD27.0
million full impairment of the remaining intangible asset value of a contract related to the
purchase of steel slabs from Corus Teeside facility. For more information, see note 27 to our
audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report and Item 8.
Financial InformationA. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial InformationLegal
ProceedingsPreviously Reported Legal Proceedings.
Operating income
Operating income in 2009 was USD296.4 million, or 6% of net sales, compared with USD1.7
billion, or 20% of net sales, in 2008.
Net financial results
Net financial income was USD132.9 million in 2009, compared with a net financial expense of
USD797.1 million in 2008. During 2009, Terniums net interest expense was USD84.7 million, a
decrease of USD19.3 million compared to 2008 due to lower indebtedness as a result of
amortizations of debt and lower interest rates.
Net foreign exchange result was a gain of USD83.1 million in 2009, compared to a loss of
USD632.7 million in 2008. These results were primarily due to the impact of the Mexican
Pesos 4% revaluation in 2009 and 25% devaluation in 2008, respectively, on Terniums Mexican
subsidiarys U.S. dollar denominated debt. These results are non-cash when measured in U.S.
dollars and are offset by changes in Terniums net equity position in the currency translation
adjustments line, as the value of Ternium Mexicos U.S. dollar denominated debt is not altered
by the Mexican Peso fluctuations when stated in U.S. dollars in Terniums consolidated
financial statements. In accordance with IFRS, Ternium Mexico prepares its financial
statements in Mexican Pesos and registers foreign exchange results on its net non-Mexican
Pesos positions when the Mexican Peso revaluates or devaluates to other currencies.
Interest income on the Sidor financial asset was USD136.0 million in 2009. This result is
attributable to the Sidor financial asset in connection with the transfer of the Sidor shares
to Venezuela on May 7, 2009.
Fair value of derivatives was a gain of USD10.6 million in 2009, compared to a loss of USD32.5
million in 2008. The result was related to certain derivative instruments entered into
primarily to mitigate the effect of interest rate and currency fluctuations.
65
Equity in earnings (losses) of associated companies
Terniums share in the results of associated companies (mainly Exiros) during 2009 was a gain
of USD1.1 million, compared to a gain of USD1.9 million in 2008.
Income tax expense
Income tax expense in 2009 was USD91.3 million or 21% of income before income tax,
discontinued operations and minority interest, compared with USD162.7 million, or 18% of
income before income tax, discontinued operations and minority interest, in 2008. The income
tax expense in 2008 included a non-recurring gain of USD96.3 million on account of Hylsas
reversal of deferred statutory profit sharing that reduced its effective tax rate for the year
(see note 4.M to our audited consolidated financial statements included in this annual
report).
Net result of discontinued operations
Net result of discontinued operations in 2009 was a gain of USD428.0 million, related to the
transfer of the Sidor shares to Venezuela on May 7, 2009. In 2008, the net result of
discontinued operations comprised an after-tax gain of USD59.6 million related to Sidor and an
after-tax gain of USD97.5 million from the sale of non-core US assets during the first quarter
of 2008.
Net income attributable to non-controlling interest
Net income attributable to non-controlling interest for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2009 was USD49.7 million, compared to USD159.7 million in 2008. The decrease was mainly
attributable to Siderars lower net income.
Foreign Currency Fluctuations
See Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market RiskForeign Exchange
Exposure Risk.
Governmental Economic, Fiscal, Monetary or Political Policies or Factors
See Item 3. Key InformationD. Risk Factors Risks Relating to the Countries in Which We
Operate.
|
B. |
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources |
We obtain funds from our operations and from short-term as well as long-term borrowings from
financial institutions. These funds are primarily used to finance our working capital and
capital expenditures requirements and acquisitions (for further information on capital
expenditures see Item 4. Information on the CompanyB. Business OverviewCapital
Expenditure Program). Also, during fiscal years 2009 and 2010, we had cash inflows of USD1.7
billion in connection with compensation payments for the nationalization of our participation
in Sidor. For more information on the Sidor nationalization process, see note 29 to our
audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report. We hold
money market investments, time deposits and variable-rate or fixed-rate securities from
investment grade issuers. During 2009 and 2010, we significantly decreased our financial
indebtedness, from USD3.3 billion at the end of 2008 to USD1.9 billion at the end of 2010,
using primarily cash provided by operating activities. For a description of the refinancing of
Ternium Mexicos 2007 syndicated loan facility, see Item 5. Operating and Financial Review
and ProspectsG. Recent DevelopmentsDebt Refinancing in Ternium Mexico.
Management believes that funds from operations will be sufficient to satisfy our current
working capital needs and service our debt in the foreseeable future. Although Ternium
believes it has access to the credit markets, it has not negotiated additional credit
facilities. Management also believes that our liquidity and capital resources give us adequate
flexibility to manage our planned capital spending programs and to address short-term changes
in business conditions.
66
The following table shows the changes in our cash and cash equivalents, excluding funds placed
in trust, for each of the periods indicated below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31, |
|
In thousands of U.S. dollars |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
806,825 |
|
|
|
1,161,758 |
|
|
|
517,513 |
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities |
|
|
(470,128 |
) |
|
|
791,233 |
|
|
|
350,530 |
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(654,118 |
) |
|
|
(922,588 |
) |
|
|
(752,909 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(317,421 |
) |
|
|
1,030,403 |
|
|
|
115,134 |
|
Effect of exchange rate changes |
|
|
1,039 |
|
|
|
(157 |
) |
|
|
(17,518 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year |
|
|
2,095,798 |
|
|
|
1,065,552 |
|
|
|
1,125,830 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents of discontinued operations at
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(157,894 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year (1) |
|
|
1,779,416 |
|
|
|
2,095,798 |
|
|
|
1,065,552 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In addition, at December 31,
2010, Ternium had USD848.4 million of other investments with maturities of more than three months
and USD12.3 million in restricted cash. |
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2010 compared to Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2009
Overview
During 2010, Terniums primary source of funding was net cash provided by operating
activities.
Cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2010 were USD1.8 billion, a USD316.4 million
decrease from USD2.1 billion at the end of the previous year. This decrease is mainly
attributable to net cash used in financing activities of USD654.1 million and net cash used in
investing activities of USD470.1 million, partially offset by net cash provided by operating
activities of USD806.8 million.
In
addition to cash and cash equivalents, as of December 31, 2010,
we held other investments with
maturity of more than three months for a total amount of
USD848.4 million, which increased substantially compared to December 31, 2009.
Operating activities
Net cash provided by operating activities was USD806.8 million in 2010 compared to USD1.2
billion in 2009, a decrease of USD354.9 million year-over-year. The main reasons for the
reduction were:
|
|
|
an increase in working capital of USD448.0 million in 2010 following the recovery
from the 2008 2009 global economic downturn, compared to a decrease in working capital
of USD635.2 million in 2009; |
partially offset by
|
|
|
an increase in net income from continuing operations of USD440.4 million; and |
|
|
|
|
a positive income tax accruals less payments adjustment of USD226.8 million in
2010, compared to a negative income tax accruals less payments adjustment of USD49.3
million in 2009. |
The significant variation in working capital during 2010, as indicated above, was attributable
to:
|
|
|
an increase of USD497.4 million in inventory, reflecting higher costs as a result
of higher input prices, as well as higher inventory volume of finished goods, goods in
process and raw materials as a result of increased operating activity (as shown in the
table below). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in inventory Dec10 / Dec09 |
|
|
|
(in millions of USD) |
|
|
|
Price |
|
|
Volume |
|
|
Total |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
56.8 |
|
|
|
104.1 |
|
|
|
160.9 |
|
Goods in process |
|
|
116.3 |
|
|
|
64.3 |
|
|
|
180.6 |
|
Raw materials, supplies and allowances |
|
|
97.5 |
|
|
|
58.4 |
|
|
|
155.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
270.6 |
|
|
|
226.8 |
|
|
|
497.4 |
|
67
|
|
|
an increase in trade and other receivables of USD149.3 million in 2010, mainly due
to higher shipments and steel prices during the fourth quarter of 2010 compared to the
fourth quarter of 2009; and |
partially offset by
|
|
|
an aggregate increase in accounts payable and other liabilities of USD198.7
million, mainly as a result of the higher activity levels in 2010. |
Investing activities
Net cash used in investing activities in 2010 was USD470.1 million, compared to net cash
provided by investing activities of USD791.2 million in 2009. This change was primarily
attributable to the following:
|
|
|
an increase in net cash used in other investing activities, net, of USD933.6
million, consisting mainly of financial investments with maturity of more than three
months, which increased USD801.6 million in 2010 (compared to a decrease of USD43.2
million in 2009); |
|
|
|
|
a decrease of USD186.2 million in the proceeds from the Sidor financial asset (from
USD953.6 million in 2009 to USD767.4 million in 2010); and |
|
|
|
|
an increase of USD141.5 million in capital expenditures (from USD208.6 million in
2009 to USD350.1 million in 2010). |
Financing activities
Net cash used in financing activities was USD654.1 million in 2010, compared to USD922.6
million in 2009. The reduction was mainly due to a lower net repayment of borrowings of
USD402.1 million in 2010, partially offset by higher dividend payments of USD138.5 million in
the same year.
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2009 compared to Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2008
Overview
During 2009, Terniums primary source of funding was net cash provided by operating and
investing activities.
Cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2009 were USD2.1 billion, a USD1.0 billion
(96.7%) increase from USD1.1 billion at the end of the previous year. This increase is mainly
attributable to net cash provided by operating activities of USD1.2 billion and net cash
provided by investing activities of USD791.2 million, partially offset by cash used in
financing activities.
In addition to cash and cash equivalents, as of December 31, 2009, we held other current
investments totaling USD46.8 million.
Operating activities
Net cash provided by operating activities was USD1.2 billion in 2009 compared to USD517.5
million in 2008, an increase of USD644.2 million year-over-year. The main reasons for the
variation in operating cash flow were:
|
|
|
a decrease in working capital of USD635.2 million in 2009 as a result of the global
economic downturn, compared to an increase in working capital of USD1.1 billion in 2008
(see below); |
68
partially offset by
|
|
|
a decrease in net income from continuing operations of USD379.0 million; |
|
|
|
|
adjustments for net foreign exchange results and others gain of USD53.6 million in
2009, compared to net foreign exchange results and others loss of USD629.5 million in
2008; and |
|
|
|
|
adjustments for net interest income related to the Sidor financial asset of USD136
million in 2009. |
The significant decrease in working capital during 2009, as indicated above, was attributable
to:
|
|
|
a decrease in trade and other receivables of USD308.9 million in 2009, mainly due
to lower export volumes and steel prices during the fourth quarter of 2009 compared to
the fourth quarter of 2008; and |
|
|
|
|
a decrease of USD429.1 million in inventory, mainly as a result of lower costs as
well as a lower volume of finished goods, goods in process and raw materials (as shown in
the table below). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in inventory (Dec09/Dec08) |
|
|
|
(in millions of USD) |
|
|
|
Price(1) |
|
|
Volume |
|
|
Total |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
(65.0 |
) |
|
|
(43.6 |
) |
|
|
(108.6 |
) |
Goods in process |
|
|
(156.9 |
) |
|
|
74.4 |
|
|
|
(82.5 |
) |
Raw materials, supplies and allowances |
|
|
(213.9 |
) |
|
|
(24.0 |
) |
|
|
(238.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
(435.9 |
) |
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
(429.1 |
)(1) |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
This amount was partially offset by a USD158.0 million write-down for net realizable
value of inventory |
The above was partially offset by an aggregate decrease in accounts payable and other
liabilities of USD102.9 million, mainly due to lower social security and other labor related
debts and lower capital expenditures during the fourth quarter of 2009 compared to the fourth
quarter of 2008.
Lower costs and inventory volume of finished goods, goods in process and raw materials in 2009
were primarily attributable to lower input prices and decreased demand during the year. In
particular, in the last quarter of 2008, generally as a result of the global crisis, demand
decreased substantially in Terniums markets. In that context, Ternium began to implement a
de-stocking process, with inventory levels decreasing mainly during the first half of 2009.
Investing activities
Net cash provided by investing activities in 2009 was USD791.2 million, compared to USD350.5
million in 2008. This variation was primarily attributable to the following events and
factors:
|
|
|
the proceeds from the Sidor financial asset of USD953.6 million in 2009; |
|
|
|
|
a decrease of USD379.3 million in capital expenditures (from USD587.9 million in
2008 to USD208.6 million in 2009); |
|
|
|
|
the proceeds from the sale of certain non-core U.S. assets in 2008, amounting to
USD718.6 million; and |
|
|
|
|
the cash generated by discontinued operations, mainly Sidor, of USD242.4 million in
2008. |
Financing activities
Net cash used in financing activities was USD922.6 million in 2009, compared to USD752.9
million in 2008. The variation was mainly due to a higher net repayment of borrowings of
USD289.5 million in 2009, partially offset by lower dividend payments of USD119.8 million in
the same year (in each case, such borrowings were mostly related to the Grupo Imsa transaction
in 2007).
69
Principal Sources of Funding
Funding Policies
Managements policy is to maintain a high degree of flexibility in operating and investment
activities by maintaining adequate liquidity levels and ensuring access to readily available
sources of financing. While Ternium currently does not have committed credit facilities
available for borrowing, management believes that Ternium could have access to external
borrowing in case of any shortfalls. We obtain financing primarily in U.S. dollars. Whenever
feasible, management bases its financing decisions, including the election of term and type of
the facility, on the intended use of proceeds for the proposed financing.
Financial Liabilities
Our financial liabilities currently consist of loans with financial institutions and minor
overdrafts transactions. These facilities are mainly denominated in U.S. dollars. As of
December 31, 2010, U.S. dollar-denominated financial liabilities represented 92.1% of total
financial liabilities. Total financial debt decreased from USD2.3 billion as of December 31,
2009, to USD1.9 billion as of December 31, 2010. During 2010, Terniums bank borrowings
(inclusive of principal and interest accrued thereon) decreased by USD387.1 million,
principally due to the repayment of a significant portion of principal and interest on
borrowings related to prior acquisitions. As of December 2010, current borrowings were 26.5%
of total borrowings, none of which corresponded to borrowings with related parties.
The following table shows Terniums financial liabilities as of December 31 of each of the
last three years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands of U.S. dollars |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Borrowings with related parties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank borrowings (1) |
|
|
1,939,657 |
|
|
|
2,326,729 |
|
|
|
3,267,327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total borrowings |
|
|
1,939,657 |
|
|
|
2,326,729 |
|
|
|
3,267,327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net of debt issuance costs |
The weighted average interest rates at December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 shown below were
calculated using the rates set for each instrument in its corresponding currency and weighted
using the U.S. dollar-equivalent outstanding principal amount of those instruments at December
31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively, after giving effect to any derivative financial
instruments used to mitigate interest rate risk.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank borrowings |
|
|
3.29 |
% |
|
|
3.04 |
% |
|
|
2.79 |
% |
As of December 31, 2010, the maturity of our financial liabilities was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands of U.S. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dollars |
|
1 year |
|
|
1 - 2 |
|
|
2 - 3 |
|
|
3 - 4 |
|
|
4 - 5 |
|
|
Over 5 |
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2010 |
|
Or less |
|
|
years |
|
|
Years |
|
|
Years |
|
|
Years |
|
|
Years |
|
|
Total |
|
Borrowings (1)(2) |
|
|
513,083 |
|
|
|
1,289,445 |
|
|
|
12,726 |
|
|
|
24,873 |
|
|
|
24,874 |
|
|
|
74,656 |
|
|
|
1,939,657 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total borrowings |
|
|
513,083 |
|
|
|
1,289,445 |
|
|
|
12,726 |
|
|
|
24,873 |
|
|
|
24,874 |
|
|
|
74,656 |
|
|
|
1,939,657 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Borrowings are bank borrowings with third parties. See B. Liquidity and Capital
ResourcesPrincipal Sources of FundingFinancial Liabilities. |
|
(2) |
|
Net of debt issuance costs. |
For a description of the refinancing of Ternium Mexicos 2007 syndicated loan
facility, see Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and ProspectsG. Recent
DevelopmentsDebt Refinancing in Ternium Mexico.
70
For information on our derivative financial instruments, please see Item 11. Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk and note 25 to our audited consolidated
financial statements included in this annual report.
Most Significant Borrowings
Our most significant borrowings as of December 31, 2010, were those incurred under Ternium
Mexicos syndicated loan facility in relation to the Grupo Imsa transaction in July 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Original |
|
|
Outstanding principal |
|
|
|
|
In Millions of U.S. dollars |
|
|
|
|
|
principal |
|
|
amount as of |
|
|
|
|
Date |
|
Borrower |
|
Type |
|
amount |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
Maturity |
|
July 2007 |
|
Ternium Mexico |
|
Syndicated loan |
|
|
3,485.0 |
|
|
|
1,789.7 |
(1) |
|
July 2012 |
(2) |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
On February 1, 2008, we completed the sale of our interests in Steelscape, Inc., ASC
Profiles Inc., Varco Pruden Buildings Inc. and Metl-Span LLC to BlueScope Steel North
America Corporation, a subsidiary of BlueScope Steel Limited, for a total consideration
of USD727 million. On February 28, 2008, we applied USD700.0 million of the proceeds of
such sale to partially prepay loans under the syndicated loan agreement. Beginning in
January 26, 2009 and until December 31, 2010 we paid four semi-annual installments of
USD249 million each. |
|
(2) |
|
In April 2011, Ternium Mexico extended the maturities under its 2007 syndicated
loan facility. See Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and ProspectsG. Recent
DevelopmentsDebt Refinancing in Ternium Mexico. |
The main covenants in our syndicated loan agreement are limitations on liens and
encumbrances, limitations on the sale or other dispositions of certain material assets, and
compliance with financial ratios (e.g., leverage ratio and interest coverage ratio).
As of December 31, 2010, we were in compliance with all covenants under our loan agreements.
For further information on our financial liabilities, borrowings and commitments please see
notes 26 and 27(ii) to our audited consolidated financial statements included in this annual
report.
|
C. |
|
Research and Development, Patents and Licenses, Etc. |
See Item 4. Information on the CompanyB. Business OverviewResearch and Development;
Product Development.
See Overview.
|
E. |
|
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements |
Ternium does not use off-balance sheet arrangements as such term is defined by applicable
SEC rules. However, as described above, Ternium has various off-balance sheet commitments to
purchase raw materials, energy (electricity, steam for the production of electricity, natural
gas and natural gas transportation), supplies (oxygen, nitrogen and argon) and production
equipment. Off-balance sheet commitments are discussed in note 27(ii) to our audited
consolidated financial statements included in this annual report.
|
F. |
|
Contractual Obligations |
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations at December 31, 2010, and the
effect such obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flow in future periods:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
as of December 31, 2010 |
|
In millions of U.S. dollars |
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 1 |
|
|
1-3 |
|
|
4-5 |
|
|
After 5 |
|
Contractual Obligations |
|
Total |
|
|
Year |
|
|
years |
|
|
years |
|
|
Years |
|
Borrowings (1) |
|
|
1,939.7 |
|
|
|
513.1 |
|
|
|
1,302.2 |
|
|
|
49.7 |
|
|
|
74.7 |
|
Estimated interest payments (2) |
|
|
70.7 |
|
|
|
26.6 |
|
|
|
27.1 |
|
|
|
13.5 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
Purchase Obligations (3) |
|
|
2,444.3 |
|
|
|
424.2 |
|
|
|
458.6 |
|
|
|
361.2 |
|
|
|
1,200.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Contractual Obligations |
|
|
4,454.7 |
|
|
|
963.9 |
|
|
|
1787.9 |
|
|
|
424.4 |
|
|
|
1,278.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Borrowings are bank borrowings with third parties. See B. Liquidity and Capital
ResourcesPrincipal Sources of FundingFinancial Liabilities. |
71
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Variable rates used in the projection are the ones settled in the current interest
period and are considered to be fixed over the years. In April 2011, we successfully
negotiated an extension of maturities under Ternium Mexicos 2007 syndicated loan
facility. Pursuant to this agreement, USD803 million originally maturing in July 2012
will be payed by Ternium Mexico in four equal semiannual installments commencing on
January 2013 and ending on July 2014, and estimated interest payments have increased
approximately USD21.8 million. |
|
(3) |
|
Purchase obligations include mainly electric power, raw materials, oxygen,
equipment and steam. Some of these purchase obligations are currently under
re-negotiation. |
|
G. |
|
Recent Developments |
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of shares from Usiminas concurrently with secondary public offering |
On January 31, 2011, Ternium entered into a transaction and registration rights agreement with
its 14.3% shareholder Usiminas and Techint Holdings S.à.r.l. (formerly known as I.I.I.
Industrial Investments Inc.) (Techint). The transaction and registration rights agreement
provided, among other things, for a SEC registered underwritten public offering of up to all
of Ternium shares held by Usiminas (less the number of shares that Ternium and Techint agreed
to purchase as discussed below) in the form of ADSs listed on the New York Stock Exchange.
Neither Ternium nor Techint offered to sell any Ternium shares or ADSs in the public offering.
On February 9, 2011, Ternium and Techint, following the pricing of the underwritten public
offering mentioned above, entered into purchase agreements with Usiminas relating to their
concurrent purchase transactions of Ternium shares. Under these agreements, on February 15,
2011, Ternium and Techint purchased from Usiminas 41,666,666 and 27,777,780 Ternium shares for
a total consideration of USD150 million and USD100 million, respectively. In connection with
the sale of Terniums shares by Usiminas, Ternium collected a USD10.2 million fee and was
reimbursed of all expenses relating to the offering and concurrent purchase.
Following consummation of these transactions, Techint owns directly 62.02% of the Companys
share capital and Tenaris holds directly 11.46% of the Companys share capital (both including
treasury shares) and Usiminas no longer owns any Ternium shares. Also, upon completion of the
transaction, the two members of Companys board of directors nominated by Usiminas resigned
from Companys board.
Debt refinancing in Ternium Mexico
On April 6, 2011, Ternium Mexico, Crédit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank, acting as
Administrative Agent, and certain banks parties to a loan agreement dated as of July 12, 2007,
partially refinanced a syndicated loan facility that had been incurred to finance Terniums
2007 acquisition of Grupo Imsa. The outstanding balance of the facility so refinanced amounted
to USD1.0 billion. As part of the refinancing, the final maturity date of bank loans in a
principal amount of USD0.8 billion was extended to July 23, 2014 (with the extended loans
being payable in four consecutive and equal semi-annual installments commencing on January 26,
2013), and the applicable margin structure for the extended loans was amended. On July 26,
2012, Ternium Mexico will repay the remaining USD0.2 billion principal amount of the loans
that were not so refinanced.
Recent developments involving Siderar
As of March 31, 2011 25.97% of Siderars equity is held by the ANSeS, Argentinas governmental
social security agency. ANSeS became a significant shareholder of Siderar in the last quarter
of 2008 as a result of the nationalization of Argentinas private pension system. Investments
held by the private pension funds were subject to certain restrictions, including a cap
preventing them to exercise more than 5% of any companys voting rights (regardless of their
share participation in any such company), and the act of Congress ordering the transfer of
assets from the private pension funds to ANSeS provided that all limitations applicable to the
pension funds would continue to apply to ANSeS. However, on April 13, 2011, the Argentine
Executive Branch issued Decree 441/2011, which purports to abrogate the 5% cap on voting
rights. If ANSeS were to exercise its voting rights in excess of the 5% cap, ANSeS may appoint
up to three out of eleven members of Siderars board of directors and one out of three members
of Siderars surveillance committee, thereby allowing the government to have an active role in
the governance of Siderar and ultimately influence its business policies. Ternium believes
that Decree 441/2011 is unconstitutional based on, among other reasons, the absence of the
urgency grounds that must be met for an act of Congress to be amended by a decree of the
Executive Branch.
72
On April 15, 2011, Siderars annual general shareholders meeting resolved, among other
things, to approve a dividend payment of ARP1.5 billion (USD370 million) to be made available
to shareholders (including Ternium) beginning on May 6, 2011. At that meeting, Ternium
objected to the exercise by ANSeS of voting rights in excess of the 5% cap; however, ANSeS was
allowed to record its vote as though the 5% restriction did not apply. Although the ANSeS
representative voted against the dividend payment and most of other resolutions proposed by
Siderars board of directors, ANSeS did not prevail in any vote, even computing its votes
without giving effect to the voting cap. Following the dividend approval, the annual
shareholders meeting was suspended until May 11, 2011.
After the meeting, the Comisión Nacional de Valores (CNV), Argentinas securities regulator,
declared Siderars shareholders meeting (including the resolution approving the USD370
million dividend) void for administrative purposes. Siderar challenged in court the CNV
resolution voiding Siderars shareholders meeting and Ternium took legal action against
Decree 441/2011. These legal actions are currently pending.
On May 2, 2011, Siderar received notice of a preliminary injunction issued at ANSeSs request
by a commercial court in the City of Buenos Aires, suspending the execution of certain
resolutions taken by Siderars shareholders meeting (including the allocation of results for
fiscal year 2010), and ordering Siderar to refrain from disposing, in whole or in part, of
certain reserves and retained earnings accounts recorded in its net equity, except for the
purpose of paying dividends. On May 5, 2011, the commercial court clarified that Siderar was
prevented from distributing dividends out of its results or reserves for the fiscal year 2010
and was solely allowed to make distributions out of results or reserves corresponding to
fiscal years prior to 2010. Siderar subsequently informed the market that, as a result of this
court decision, it was not permitted to make on May 11, 2011, the dividend payment approved by
its April 15, 2011 shareholders meeting, and filed an appeal against the court decisions in
accordance with applicable law. The appeal is currently pending.
On May 6, 2011, the CNV issued a resolution requesting Siderar to convene a new shareholders
meeting. But on May 11, 2011, at Terniums request, the Commercial Court of Appeals of the
City of Buenos Aires authorized Siderar to maintain its annual shareholders meeting suspended
for 60 days. While Siderar filed an appeal against this CNV resolution (which is currently
pending), Siderars board of directors convened a new general shareholders meeting to be held
on July 21, 2011.
On May 27, 2011, a federal prosecutor requested a federal criminal court in the City of Buenos
Aires to investigate whether the members of Siderars board of directors should be subject to
criminal penalties as a result of Siderars failure to provide additional information on the
allocation of Siderars ARP6.5 billion (or USD1.5 billion) special reserve for future
dividends or to distribute a higher amount of dividends out of the special reserve. The
special reserve, which increased significantly since 2003, had not previously been
objected to or challenged by Siderars shareholders or any regulatory authority. Ternium
believes that the prosecutors allegations are unsupported.
In addition, on June 2, 2011, the CNV instituted administrative proceedings against the
members of Siderars board of directors and supervisory committee. These proceedings are
intended to determine if these persons breached their legal duties by preventing ANSeS from
exercising its voting rights in excess of the 5% cap at the April 15, 2011 shareholders
meeting. These proceedings are currently ongoing.
While Ternium believes that Siderar and the members of its board of directors and surveillance
committee acted at all times in accordance with applicable law, Ternium cannot give any
assurance as to the ultímate outcome of the above described legal actions and proceedings.
Settlement of arbitration proceedings
The
disclosure below should be read in conjunction with Item 8. Financial InformationA. Consolidated Statements and
Other Financial InformationLegal ProceedingsPreviously Reported Legal Proceedings.
On April 15, 2011, the arbitration tribunal issued a second partial final award where it held
that the off-takers should pay to the claimant GBP 1.6 million for its reasonable legal and
other costs incurred before the first partial final award. The off-takers paid that amount
around mid May. In addition, on May 27, 2011, the off-takers paid to Tata an aggregate amount
of USD16.3 million (of which Ternium Procurement paid USD 3.2 million) as indemnification for
one of its claims under the arbitration proceedings.
73
On June 16, 2011, Tata, the off-takers and Ternium Mexico settled the dispute, and the
off-takers, in exchange for a full release and discharge of each of them and their respective
representatives and affiliates, from all claims and disputes that Tata may have against any of
them in relation to the off-take framework agreement and its related agreements, agreed to pay
to Tata an aggregate amount of USD124 million (including the USD16.3 million previously paid)
and authorized their agent under the off-take agreements to transfer to Tata UK£1.8 million
and 0.5 million which had been received by the agent from the off-takers under the off-take
framework agreement before the early termination of such agreement. Ternium Procurement paid
to Tata its share of the settlement amount (i.e., USD21.3 million) on June 17, 2011. On June
21, 2011, Tata notified the arbitration tribunal that the arbitration proceedings were
withdrawn. For more information, see Item 8. Financial InformationA. Consolidated
Statements and Other Financial InformationLegal ProceedingsPreviously Reported Legal
Proceedings.
Annual General Meeting and Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders
On June 1, 2011, the annual general meeting of shareholders of the Company approved all
resolutions on its agenda. Among other resolutions adopted at the meeting, the shareholders
approved the consolidated financial statements and annual accounts for the year ended December
31, 2010, as well as the payment of an annual dividend of USD0.075 per share (USD0.75 per
ADS), or an aggregate amount of approximately USD150.4 million. The Company paid such dividend
on June 9, 2011. For further information about payment of dividends, see Item 8. Financial
InformationConsolidated Statements and Other Financial InformationDividend Policy.
The shareholders meeting also re-elected Ubaldo Aguirre, Roberto Bonatti, Carlos Condorelli,
Pedro Pablo Kuczynski, Adrian Lajous, Bruno Marchettini, Gianfelice Mario Rocca, Paolo Rocca
and Daniel Agustín Novegil as members of the board of directors to serve until the next annual
shareholders meeting that will be convened to decide on the 2011 accounts, and appointed
PricewaterhouseCoopers S.àr.l., Réviseur dentreprises agréé, as our independent auditors for
the year ending December 31, 2011.
The board of directors subsequently re-appointed Paolo Rocca as its chairman and Daniel
Novegil as Terniums chief executive officer, and confirmed Ubaldo Aguirre, Pedro Pablo
Kuczynski and Adrián Lajous as members of the boards audit committee, with Mr. Aguirre to
continue chairing that committee. All three members of the audit committee qualify as
independent directors under our articles of association.
On June 1, 2011, the extraordinary general meeting of shareholders also approved, among other
amendments to the articles of association, amendment to Article 15 of the articles of
association regarding the date of the annual general meetings of shareholders so that in the
future they are held on the first Wednesday of May of each year. Additionally, such meeting
also approved the amendment of Article 2 of the articles of association in order to adapt it
to the abolishment of Luxembourg law of July 31, 1929.
|
|
|
Item 6. |
|
Directors, Senior Management and Employees |
|
A. |
|
Directors and Senior Management |
|
|
|
|
Board of Directors |
The Companys articles of association provide for a board of directors consisting of a minimum
of five members (when the shares of the Company are listed on a regulated market, as they
currently are) and a maximum of fifteen. The Companys current board of directors is composed
of nine directors, three of whom are independent directors. The board of directors is vested
with the broadest powers to act on behalf of the Company and accomplish or authorize all acts
and transactions of management and disposal that are within its corporate purpose and which
are not specifically reserved in the articles of association or by applicable law to the
general shareholders meeting.
74
The board of directors is required to meet as often as required by the interests of the
Company and at least four times per year. A majority of the members of the board of directors
in office present or represented at each board of directors meeting constitutes a quorum, and
resolutions may be adopted by the vote of a majority of the directors present or represented.
In case of a tie, the chairman is entitled to cast the deciding vote.
Directors are elected at the annual ordinary general shareholders meeting to serve one-year
renewable terms, as determined by the general shareholders meeting. The general shareholders
meeting also determines the directors compensation. The general shareholders meeting may
dismiss all or any one member of the board of directors at any time, with or without cause, by
resolution passed by a simple majority vote.
On January 9, 2006, Tenaris and a wholly-owned subsidiary of San Faustin entered into a
shareholders agreement, pursuant to which such San Faustin subsidiary is required to take all
actions in its power to cause one of the members of the Companys board of directors to be
nominated by Tenaris and any directors nominated by Tenaris only be removed pursuant to
written instructions by Tenaris. Tenaris and San Faustins subsidiary also agreed to cause any
vacancies on the board of directors to be filled with new directors nominated by either
Tenaris or the San Faustin subsidiary, as applicable. On April 27, 2007, the San Faustin
subsidiary assigned all of its rights and obligations under the shareholders agreement to
Techint. The shareholders agreement will remain in effect so long as each of the parties
holds at least 5% of the shares of the Company or until it is terminated by either Tenaris or
Techint pursuant to its terms. Carlos A. Condorelli was nominated by Tenaris and appointed as
a director pursuant to this agreement.
Within the limits of applicable law, the board of directors of the Company may delegate to one
or more persons, whether or not members of the board of directors, the Companys day-to-day
management and the authority to represent the Company, provided that such delegation shall be
subject to prior authorization by the general shareholders meeting. On September 14, 2005,
following the requisite authorization at the general shareholders meeting, the board of
directors delegated such day-to-day management and authority to Daniel A. Novegil. On June 1,
2011, the Companys annual general shareholders meeting re-elected Ubaldo Aguirre, Roberto
Bonatti, Carlos Condorelli, Pedro Pablo Kuczynski, Adrian Lajous, Bruno Marchettini,
Gianfelice Mario Rocca, Paolo Rocca and Daniel Agustin Novegil as members of the board of
directors to serve until the next annual shareholders meeting, which will be held in May
2012. The board of directors subsequently re-appointed Paolo Rocca as its chairman and Daniel
Novegil as chief executive officer of the Company.
The following table sets forth the current members of the board of directors of the Company,
their respective offices on the board, their principal occupation, their years of service as
board members and their age.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years as |
|
|
Age at May 5, |
|
Name |
|
Position |
|
Principal Occupation |
|
director |
|
|
2011 |
|
Paolo Rocca (1) |
|
Chairman |
|
Chairman and CEO of Tenaris, director and vice president of San Faustin |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
Ubaldo Jose Aguirre |
|
Director |
|
Managing director of AGM/R S.A. and Aguirre y Gonzalez S.A. |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
Roberto Bonatti (1) |
|
Director |
|
Director and president of San Faustin and director of Tenaris |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
Carlos Condorelli |
|
Director |
|
Director of Tenaris |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
Adrián Lajous Vargas |
|
Director |
|
Senior energy advisor at McKinsey & Company and president of Petrométrica, S.C. |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
Bruno Marchettini |
|
Director |
|
Director of San Faustin and senior advisor in technological matters for the Techint group |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
Daniel Agustín Novegil |
|
Director |
|
CEO of the Company |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
Gianfelice Mario Rocca (1) |
|
Director |
|
Chairman of the board of directors of San Faustin, director of Tenaris and president of Humanitas Group |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
Pedro Pablo Kuczynski |
|
Director |
|
Senior advisor of The Rohatyn Group |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Paolo Rocca and Gianfelice Rocca are brothers, and Roberto Bonatti is Paolo and
Gianfelice Roccas first cousin. |
Paolo Rocca. Mr. Rocca has served as chairman of the Board since 2005. He is a grandson of
Agostino Rocca. He is also chairman and chief executive officer of Tenaris and chairman of the
board of directors of Tamsa S.A. In addition, he is a member of the board of directors and
vice president of San Faustin and a director of Techint Financial Corporation N.V. Mr. Rocca
is vice-chairman of the World Steel Association and a member of the International Advisory
Committee of NYSE Euronext (New York Stock Exchange). Mr. Rocca is an Italian citizen.
75
Ubaldo Aguirre. Mr. Aguirre has served on the Board since 2006. He is a managing director of
AGM/R S.A. and Aguirre y Gonzalez S.A., both Argentine banking investment firms, and also
serves as a member of the board of directors and member of the audit committee of Juan Minetti
S.A., a subsidiary of Holcim, the Swiss cement producer. Since 2005, he also serves as
chairman of the board of directors of Permasur S.A., and since 2000 as member of the board of
directors of URS Argentina S.A. Mr. Aguirre formerly served as director and chairman of the
audit committee of Siderar. Mr. Aguirre began his career at the World Bank in Washington, D.C.
In addition, Mr. Aguirre has been a member of the boards of each of Argentinas Central Bank
where he was responsible for that countrys external borrowing program and financial
negotiations Banco de la Nación Argentina and Banco Nacional de Desarrollo. He also served
as the Republic of Argentinas financial representative for Europe in Geneva and negotiator on
behalf of the Republic of Argentina with the Paris Club. Mr. Aguirre is an Argentine citizen.
Roberto Bonatti. Mr. Bonatti has served as a director of the Company since 2005. He is a
grandson of Agostino Rocca, founder of the Techint group, a group of companies controlled by
San Faustin. Throughout his career in the Techint group he has been involved specifically in
the engineering and construction and corporate sectors. He was first employed by the Techint
group in 1976, as deputy resident engineer in Venezuela. In 1984, he became a director of San
Faustin, and since 2001 he has served as its president. In addition, Mr. Bonatti currently
serves as president of Techint Compañía Técnica Internacional S.A.C.I. and Tecpetrol S.A. He
is also a member of the board of directors of Tenaris, Siderca S.A.I.C. and Siderar. Mr.
Bonatti is an Italian citizen.
Carlos Condorelli. Mr. Condorelli has served as a director of the Company since 2005. He is
currently a member of the board of directors of Tenaris. He began his career within the
Techint group in 1975 as an analyst in the accounting and administration department of
Siderar. He has held several positions within Tenaris and other Techint group companies,
including chief financial officer of Tenaris, finance and administration director of Tubos de
Acero de México, S.A. and president of the board of directors of Empresa Distribuidora La
Plata S.A., an Argentine utilities company. Mr. Condorelli is an Argentine citizen.
Adrián Lajous Vargas. Mr. Lajous has served as a director of the Company since 2006. Mr.
Lajous currently serves as the senior energy advisor to McKinsey & Company, chairman of the
Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, president of Petrométrica, S.C. and non-executive
director of Schlumberger, Ltd. and Trinity Industries Inc. Mr. Lajous began his career
teaching economics at El Colegio de México and in 1977 was appointed director general for
energy at Mexicos Ministry of Energy. Mr. Lajous joined Pemex in 1983, where he held a
succession of key executive positions including executive coordinator for international trade,
corporate director of planning, corporate director of operations and director of refining and
marketing. From 1994 until 1999, he served as chief executive officer of Pemex and chairman of
the boards of the Pemex Group of operating companies. Mr. Lajous is a Mexican citizen.
Bruno Marchettini. Mr. Marchettini has served on the Board since 2006. Mr. Marchettini is
senior advisor in technological matters for the Techint group. Mr. Marchettini has retired
from executive positions and is presently engaged as a consultant by Siderar. Mr. Marchettini
is a director of San Faustin. Mr. Marchettini is an Italian citizen.
Daniel Agustín Novegil. Mr. Novegil has served as a director and chief executive officer of
the Company since 2005. Mr. Novegil joined Propulsora Siderurgica in 1978 and was appointed as
its general director in 1991. In 1993, following the merger of the privatized company Somisa
with Propulsora, he was appointed managing director of
Siderar. In 1998, after the acquisition of Sidor, Mr. Novegil was appointed chairman and chief
executive officer of Sidor. In March 2003, Mr. Novegil was designated executive vice-president
of the Techint Flat and Long Steel Division, with executive responsibilities over Siderar and
Sidor. He became president of Siderar in May 2005. Mr. Novegil is an Argentine citizen.
Gianfelice Mario Rocca. Mr. Rocca has served as a director of the Company since 2006. He is a
grandson of Agostino Rocca. He is chairman of the board of directors of San Faustin, a member
of the board of directors of Tenaris, president of the Humanitas Group, honorary president of
the board of directors of Techint Compagnia Tecnica Internazionale S.p.A. and president of the
board of directors of Tenova S.p.A. In addition, he sits on the board of directors or
executive committees of several companies, including Allianz S.p.A, RCS Quotidiani and Buzzi
Unicem. He is vice president of Confindustria, the leading association of Italian
industrialists. He is a member of the Advisory Board of Allianz Group, of the Trilateral
Commission and of the European Advisory Board of the Harvard Business School. Mr. Rocca is an
Italian citizen.
76
Pedro Pablo Kuczynski. Mr. Kuczynski has served as a member of the Board since 2007. He was
Prime Minister of Peru in 2005-2006 and prior to that he was the Minister of Economy and
Finance from 2001. He was the Republic of Perus Minister of Energy and Mines in 1980-82. He
was president until 2001 of a private equity firm he founded in 1992 after spending ten years
as Chairman of First Boston International (today Credit Suisse) in New York. Since 2007, he
is Senior Advisor to the Rohatyn Group, a firm specializing in emerging markets. He ran a
bauxite mining company affiliated with Alcoa between 1977 and 1980. He began his career at
the World Bank in 1961 and was in the 1970s head of its Policy Planning Division, Chief
Economist for Latin America and Chief Economist of IFC. He was born in Peru in 1938 and
educated in Peru and at Oxford and Princeton. Mr. Kuczynski is an U.S. and Peruvian national.
Director Liability
Under Luxembourg law, a director may be liable to the Company for any damage caused by
management errors, such as wrongful acts committed during the execution of the mandate granted
to them by the Company, and to the Company, its shareholders and third parties in the event
that the Company, its shareholders, or third parties suffer a loss due to an infringement of
either the Luxembourg Company Law or the Companys articles of association. A shareholder may
in certain circumstances have rights to damages if a duty owed by the directors is breached.
Under Luxembourg law, any director having a conflict of interest in respect of a transaction
submitted for approval to the board of directors may not take part in the deliberations
concerning such transaction and must inform the board of such conflict. Subject to certain
exceptions, transactions in which any directors may have had an interest conflicting with that
of the Company must be reported at the next shareholders meeting following any such
transaction.
The general shareholders meeting may dismiss all or any one member of the board of directors
at any time, with or without cause, by resolution passed by a simple majority vote,
irrespective of the number of shares present or represented at the meeting.
A director will not be liable for acts committed in accordance with a resolution if,
notwithstanding his presence at the meeting at which such a resolution was adopted, such
director advised the board of directors that he opposed the resolution and caused a record of
his statement of opposition to be included in the minutes of the meeting.
Causes of action against directors for damages may be initiated by the Company upon a
resolution of the shareholders passed by a simple majority vote, irrespective of the number of
shares present or represented at the meeting. Causes of action against directors who
misappropriate corporate assets (for example, by using corporate assets for their own benefit)
or commit a breach of trust (for example, by breaching their fiduciary duties to the Company)
may be brought by any shareholder for personal losses different from those of the Company. In
general, claims must be brought within five years from the occurrence of an action for which
liability may apply, or in the case of fraud, from the date the fraud is discovered.
It is customary in Luxembourg that the shareholders expressly discharge the members of the
board of directors from any liability arising out of or in connection with the exercise of
their mandate when approving the annual accounts of the Company at the annual shareholders
meeting. However, such discharge will not release the directors from liability for any damage
caused by wrongful acts committed during the execution of their mandate or due to an
infringement of either the Luxembourg Company Law or the Companys articles of association.
Auditors
The Companys articles of association require the appointment of at least one independent
auditor chosen from among the members of the Luxembourg Institute of Independent Auditors.
Auditors are appointed by the general shareholders meeting, on the audit committees
recommendation, through a resolution passed by a simple majority vote. Shareholders may
determine the number and the term of the office of the auditors at the ordinary general
shareholders meeting, provided however that an auditors term shall not exceed one year and
that any auditor may be reappointed or dismissed by the general shareholders meeting at any
time, with or without cause. Luxembourg law does not allow directors to serve concurrently as
independent auditors.
77
Our independent auditors for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 were
PricewaterhouseCoopers (acting, in connection with our annual accounts and annual consolidated
financial statements required under Luxembourg law, through PricewaterhouseCoopers S.àr.l.,
Réviseur d entreprises agréé, and in connection with our annual and interim consolidated
financial statements required under the laws of any other relevant jurisdiction, through Price
Waterhouse & Co. S.R.L.). Our independent auditors are appointed annually for one-year terms.
Following our recent corporate reorganization (see Item 10. Additional InformationE.
TaxationGrand Duchy of LuxembourgCorporate
Reorganization), our audit committee
recommended, and the annual shareholders meeting approved at a
meeting held on June 1, 2011, that PricewaterhouseCoopers
S.àr.l., Réviseur dentreprises agréé, be appointed as independent auditors for the year
ending December 31, 2011, in connection with all of our annual accounts and financial
statements.
Senior Management
The following table sets forth certain information concerning our senior management:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Age at |
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
Name |
|
2010 |
|
Position |
Daniel Novegil |
|
58 |
|
Chief Executive Officer; Director |
Pablo Brizzio |
|
40 |
|
Chief Financial Officer |
Julián Eguren |
|
47 |
|
North Region Area Manager |
Martín Berardi |
|
53 |
|
Siderar Executive Vice President |
Oscar Montero Martínez |
|
50 |
|
Planning and Operations General Director |
Paolo Bassetti |
|
46 |
|
Brazil General Director |
Luis Andreozzi |
|
60 |
|
Engineering and Environment Director |
Miguel Punte |
|
63 |
|
Human Resources Director |
Roberto Demidchuk |
|
49 |
|
Chief Information Officer |
Rubén Herrera |
|
53 |
|
Quality and Product Director |
Daniel A. Novegil. See Board of Directors.
Pablo Brizzio. Mr. Brizzio currently serves as our Chief Financial Officer. He began his
career with the Techint group in 1993 in Siderar. Since then, he has held several positions
within the Techint group. He served as finance director of Ternium from 2005 to 2007 and in
2009 and in 2008 he served as chief financial officer of Sidor. In 2010 he assumed his
position as chief financial officer of the Company. Mr. Brizzio is an Argentine citizen.
Martín Berardi. Mr. Berardi is our Siderar Executive Vice President. He began his career with
the Techint group in 1980 as a trainee in Propulsora Siderúrgica. He has held several
positions within the Techint group including in Propulsora Siderúrgica, Siat S.A.I.C. and
Siderca. He served as managing director of Siat (1992-1995), managing director of Tamsa
(1995-2000), president and chief executive officer of Sidor (2000-2004) and became managing
director of Siderar in October 2004, a position which he held until he assumed his present
position at the Company. He was president of the IVES between 2002 and 2004, president of
Mercofer between 2006 and 2009, and he has been vice-president of CAA (Iron Argentine Chamber)
since 2004 and a member of the board of directors of ITBA (Buenos Aires Institute of
Technology) since 2005. Mr. Berardi is an Argentine citizen.
Julián Eguren. Mr. Eguren is our North Region Area Manager. Since January 2008, he is chief
executive officer of Ternium Mexico. Prior to that, he served as chief executive officer of
Sidor. He has held several other executive
positions since joining the Techint group in 1987, such as commercial director of Sidor, chief
executive officer of Tavsa, Tubos de Acero de Venezuela S.A., general manager of Socominter
(Venezuela), economic planning manager and treasurer of Tamsa and commercial planning manager
of Siderca. He was also a director of IVES, ILAFA and Matesi, Materiales Siderúrgicos S.A.
(Matesi), and president of CAVEARG (Venezuelan Argentinean Chamber). Mr. Eguren is an
Argentine citizen.
Oscar Montero Martínez. Mr. Montero is our Planning and Operations General Director. He began
his career with the Techint group in 1984 as a commercial analyst in Siderar. Since then, he
has held several positions within Siderar in the planning, commercial and procurement areas.
In 1998, he assumed the position of strategic planning director of Sidor. Since 2005, he
serves as planning and operations general director of the Company. Mr. Montero is an Argentine
citizen.
78
Paolo Bassetti. Mr. Bassetti currently serves as our Brazil General Director. He began his
career with the Techint group in 1991 as an analyst. Since then, he has held several positions
within the Techint group in the commercial and procurement areas. In 2004 he assumed the
position of managing director of TenarisSilcotub (2004 2008). Since 2009 he serves as Brazil
General Director of the Company. Mr. Bassetti is an Italian citizen.
Luis Andreozzi. Mr. Andreozzi is our Engineering and Environment Director. He began his career
with the Techint group in 1968 as a trainee in Siderca. He has held several positions within
other Techint group companies, including Techint Engineering Company, or TEING, Siderar and
Sidor. Most recently, he served as construction manager of TEING (1986-1992), construction
manager of Siderar (1992-1998), engineering and environment general manager of Sidor
(1998-2004) and technology manager of the Techint Flat and Long Steel Division, a position he
held until he assumed his present position at the Company. Mr. Andreozzi is an Italian
citizen.
Miguel Punte. Mr. Punte is our Human Resources Director. In 1970, Mr. Punte joined Siderar,
where he held several positions within the human resources department. In 1984, he joined
Finma S.A., or Finma, an affiliate of the Techint group that provides human resources services
to Techint group companies. At Finma, Mr. Punte served first as human resources manager and
later as human resources director until 2005, when he was appointed human resources director
of Siderar, a position that he held until he assumed his present position at the Company. Mr.
Punte is an Argentine citizen.
Roberto Demidchuk. Mr. Demidchuk currently serves as our Chief Information Officer. He joined
the Techint group in 1986 as a trainee for Teing. Since then he has held several positions in
different Techint group companies, including programming manager and procurement manager at
Siderar and supply chain director at Ternium. Mr. Demidchuk is an Argentine citizen.
Rubén Herrera. Mr. Herrera is our Quality and Product Director since July 1, 2008. He is also
Quality and Product Director of Ternium Mexico since 2007. Since joining the Techint group in
1990, he has held several other executive positions, including Mechanical Metallurgical
Department Chief in Sidercas Industrial Research Center, Product Manager of Siderar, and
Quality and Product Director of Sidor. Mr. Herrera is an Argentine citizen.
The compensation of the members of the Companys board of directors is determined at the
annual ordinary general shareholders meeting. Each member of the board of directors received
for the year 2010 a fee of USD70,000, and the chairman of the board of directors received an
additional fee of USD280,000. The chairman of the audit committee received as additional
compensation a fee of USD60,000, while the other members of the audit committee received an
additional fee of USD50,000. Under the Companys articles of association the members of the
audit committee are not eligible to participate in any incentive compensation plan for
employees of the Company or any of its subsidiaries.
The aggregate cash compensation received by directors and senior management for the year 2010
amounted to approximately USD13.3 million. In addition, directors and senior management
received for the year 2010 1,170,415 units for a total amount of USD3.4 million, in connection
with the employee incentive retention program described in note 4.N.3 Employee
liabilitiesOther compensation obligations to our audited consolidated financial statements
included in this annual report.
There are no service contracts between any director and Ternium that provide for material
benefits upon termination of employment.
See A. Directors and Senior Management.
Audit Committee
On June 1, 2011, the Companys board of directors re-appointed Ubaldo Aguirre, Adrián Lajous
and Pedro Pablo Kuczynski as members of its audit committee, with Mr. Aguirre to continue
chairing that committee. All three members of the audit committee are independent directors as
defined under the Companys articles of association.
79
Under the Companys articles of association, an independent director is a director who:
|
(i) |
|
is not employed, and has not been employed in an executive capacity by the Company
or any of its subsidiaries within the five years preceding the ordinary general
shareholders meeting at which the candidate for the board of directors was voted upon; |
|
(ii) |
|
does not receive consulting, advisory or other compensatory fees from the Company
or any of its subsidiaries (other than fees received as a member of the board of
directors of any committee thereof and fees received as a member of the board of
directors or other governing body, or any committee thereof, of any of the Companys
subsidiaries); |
|
(iii) |
|
is not a person who directly or indirectly controls the Company;
|
|
(iv) |
|
does not have, and does not control a business entity that has, a material business
relationship with the Company, any of its subsidiaries or a person who directly or
indirectly controls the Company, if such material business relationship would reasonably
be expected to adversely affect the directors ability to properly discharge his or her
duties; |
|
(v) |
|
does not control, and is not and has not been, within the five years preceding the
ordinary general shareholders meeting at which the candidate for the board of directors
was voted upon, employed by a present or former internal or external auditor of the
Company, any of its subsidiaries or a person who directly or indirectly controls the
Company; and |
|
(vi) |
|
is not a spouse, parent, sibling or relative up to the third degree of, and does
not share a home with, any of the persons above described. |
Under our articles of association and the audit committee charter, the audit committee is
required, among other things, to report to the board of directors on its activity and the
adequacy of the Companys systems of internal control over financial reporting. In addition,
the charter of the audit committee sets forth, among other things, the audit committees
purpose and responsibilities. The audit committee assists the board of directors in its
oversight responsibilities with respect to the integrity of the Companys financial statements
and is responsible for making recommendations regarding the appointment, dismissal,
compensation, retention and oversight of, and assess the independence of the Companys
independent auditors (see Item 16.CPrincipal Accountant Fees and Services for additional
information about the audit committees procedures with respect to our independent auditors).
The audit committee also performs other duties imposed upon it by applicable laws and
regulations of the regulated market or markets on which the shares of the Company are listed,
as well as any other duty entrusted to it by the Companys board of directors.
In addition, the audit committee is required by the Companys articles of association to
review Material Transactions, as such term is defined by the Companys articles of
association, to be entered into by the Company or its subsidiaries with Related Parties, as
such term is defined by the Companys articles of association (other than transactions
reviewed and approved by the independent members of the board of directors of the Company or
through any other procedures that the board of directors may deem substantially equivalent to
the foregoing), in order to determine whether their terms are consistent with market
conditions or are otherwise fair to the Company and/or its subsidiaries. In the case of
Material Transactions entered into by the Companys subsidiaries with Related Parties, the
Companys audit committee will review those transactions entered into by those subsidiaries
whose boards of directors do not have independent members, or that have not been reviewed and
approved by such independent directors or through any other procedures that the board of
directors of the Company may deem substantially equivalent to the foregoing.
Under the Companys articles of association, as supplemented by the audit committees charter:
|
|
|
a Material Transaction is (i) any transaction with or involving a Related Party (x)
with an individual value equal to or greater than ten million U.S. dollars or (y) with an
individual value lower than ten million U.S. dollars, when the aggregate sum of any
series of transactions reflected in the financial statements of the four fiscal quarters
of the Company preceding the date of determination (excluding any transactions that were
reviewed and approved by any of the audit committee of the Company, or any of its
subsidiaries, the board of directors of the Company, the
independent members of the board of directors or other governing body of any subsidiary of
the Company, or a majority of the members of the board of directors or similar governing
body of any subsidiary of the Company that were not nominated by or at the request of the
Company or any entity that directly or indirectly controls or is under common control with
the Company) exceeds 1.5% of the Companys consolidated net sales made in the fiscal year
preceding the year on which the determination is made; or (ii) any corporate reorganization
transaction (including a merger, spin-off or bulk transfer of a business) involving the
Company or any of its direct or indirect subsidiaries for the benefit of or involving a
Related Party; and |
80
|
|
|
a Related Party is, in relation to the Company or its direct or indirect
subsidiaries, any of the following persons: (i) a member of the board of directors of the
Company or of the board of directors or other governing body of any of the Companys
subsidiaries; (ii) any member of the board of directors or other governing body of an
entity that directly or indirectly controls the Company; (iii) any entity that directly
or indirectly controls or is under common control with the Company (other than the
Companys subsidiaries); (iv) any entity controlled directly or indirectly by any member
of the board of directors of the Company, or of the board of directors or other governing
body of any subsidiary of the Company; and (v) any spouses, parents, siblings or
relatives up to the third degree of, and any person that shares a home with, any person
referred to in (i) or (ii). |
The audit committee has the power (to the maximum extent permitted by applicable laws) to
request that the Company or relevant subsidiary provide any information necessary for it to
review any Material Transaction. A Related Party transaction shall not be entered into unless
(i) the circumstances underlying the proposed transaction justify that it be entered into
before it can be reviewed by the Companys audit committee or approved by the board of
directors and (ii) the Related Party agrees to unwind the transaction if the Companys audit
committee or board of directors does not approve it.
The audit committee has the authority to conduct any investigation appropriate to fulfilling
its responsibilities, and has direct access to the Companys internal and external auditors as
well as Terniums management and employees and, subject to applicable laws, its subsidiaries.
The following table shows the number of persons employed by Ternium and its consolidated
subsidiaries and does not include the number of persons employed at its held-for-sale
subsidiaries as at the end of each of the past three financial years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Mexico |
|
|
8,575 |
|
|
|
8,051 |
|
|
|
8,597 |
|
Argentina |
|
|
5,416 |
|
|
|
5,281 |
|
|
|
5,609 |
|
Colombia |
|
|
1,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
562 |
|
|
|
547 |
|
|
|
586 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total employees (1) |
|
|
15,928 |
|
|
|
13,879 |
|
|
|
14,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
It does not include 2,137 employees of contractors who performed services at
Terniums facilities at year-end 2010, 2,092 employees at year-end 2009 and 1,241
employees at year-end 2008. Personnel of contractors who performed services at Terniums
facilities at year-end 2010 and 2009 increased compared to such personnel at year-end
2008 as a result of the normalization of production at Terniums facilities, following
the downturn that began in the fourth quarter 2008. |
At December 31, 2010, the number of persons employed by Ternium was 15,928. During 2010, the
aggregate number of employees increased compared to year-end 2009, mainly due to the
acquisition of Ferrasa and higher activity levels. During 2009, the aggregate number of
employees decreased compared to year-end 2008, mainly due to the initiatives that Ternium
launched to mitigate the economic downturn.
81
Mexico
In Mexico, approximately 64% of Ternium employees are
unionized. Of these, approximately,
53% of Mexicos unionized workers are members of FENASA (Federación Nacional de Asociaciones
Sindicales Autónomas), the national federation of autonomous union associations, and 47% are
members of FNSI (Federación Nacional de Sindicatos Independientes), the national federation
of independent unions. The unionized employees of Peña Colorada, however, are members of
Sindicato de Trabajadores Mineros, Metalúrgicos y Similares de la República Mexicana (Union of
Mexican Republic mine, metal and similar workers). The applicable collective bargaining
agreements are negotiated every two years and salary adjustments are made on an annual basis.
During 2010 and the beginning of 2011, Terniums subsidiaries and the unions reached
agreements regulating safety, operating flexibility, as required at some production lines,
transparency and conduct. Despite some minor social and union conflicts, Terniums Mexican
subsidiaries maintain good relations with their labor force in Mexico and have never
experienced a strike or work stoppage.
Under Mexican law, companies are required to pay to their employees an annual benefit of 10%
of their taxable income (profit sharing program), calculated similarly to income tax.
Under Mexican law, Ternium Mexico is required to pay social security and tax contributions as
follows: the companys social security contributions are equal to 20.4% of the minimum salary
plus additional contributions of around 20% over the employees total salary (subject to a
cap); Ternium Mexico must also withhold an additional percentage for social security
contributions (equal to 2.8%) from salaries up to a certain cap.
Under Mexican labor laws, when an employee is dismissed without cause or for a cause that is
challenged by the employee, an employee (other than trust employees and those with less than
one year of service) may choose to demand to be reinstated in his or her employment or to be
paid severance which is equal to three monthly salaries, plus accrued benefits, such as
vacations, thirteenth month salary, and seniority bonus
(prima de antigüedad) equal to
twelve days of salary per each year of service. In the former case, if the Conciliation and
Arbitration Board determines that even though dismissal was not properly grounded but
reinstatement is not possible, employer must pay a dismissed employee back wages accrued
during trial, severance equal to three monthly salaries, plus accrued benefits, such as
vacations, thirteenth month salary, seniority bonus (prima
de antigüedad) equal to twelve
days of salary per each year of service and additional compensation equal to twenty days per
each year of service.
In Mexico, Ternium has defined benefit and defined contribution plans which are granted to the
employees depending on several factors, such as their commencement date, whether they are or
not covered by a collective bargaining agreement, etc. Defined benefit employee retirement
plans (pensions and seniority premiums) are based primarily on their years of service, their
present age and their remuneration at the date of retirement. The formal retirement plans are
congruent with and complementary to the retirement benefits established by the Mexican
Institute of Social Security. Additionally, some high level employees benefit from a plan to
cover health-care expenses of retired employees. The defined contribution plans provide a
benefit equivalent to the capital accumulated with the companys contributions, which are
provided as a match of employees contributions to the plan. The plan provides vested rights
according to the years of service and cause of retirement. For further information see Note
4.(N) Accounting policiesEmployee liabilities to our consolidated financial statements
included elsewhere in this annual report.
Argentina
Most of Siderars employees are members of the Argentine metalworkers union (the Unión Obrera
Metalúrgica de la República Argentina, or UOM) and are covered by a collective agreement that
includes all workers in the Argentine steel industry. The employees are also covered by
certain complementary collective agreements between Siderar and the UOM that define specific
issues related to each or all plants, such as working structures, performance related
compensation, productivity, production quantity and quality and Siderars result-related
compensation. These agreements are subject to periodic modification and are updated in
relation to competitiveness, quality, safety and efficiency goals and to reflect inflation
adjustments.
As part of the privatization process in 1992, 20% of Siderars shares were sold to former
employees of the acquired state-owned company Somisa under the Programa de Propiedad
Participada (the Employee Stock Ownership Plan). For further information see Item 4.
Information on the CompanyC. Organizational StructureSubsidiariesSiderar.
Many foremen of Siderar are affiliated with the Asociación de Supervisores de Industria
Metalmecánica de la República Argentina (ASIMRA), the union of supervisors of different
activities in the metal manufacturing industry.
ASIMRA-affiliated employees are subject to an agreement signed with Siderar that establishes
regulations relating to salaries, working organization, absences, vacations, benefits and
labor relations. These agreements are subject to periodic modification and are updated in
relation to the requirements of the production processes.
82
In the last five years, nominal salaries in local currency increased substantially, reflecting
the economic situation of the country and inflation, and were the result of collective
agreements entered into with the labor authorities involvement. On March 31, 2011, agreement
on salaries between the employers entity representing steel companies in the collective
bargaining including Siderar and the steelworkers unions expired. Recently, an agreement
was reached on salaries between the employers entity representing steel companies in the
collective bargaining including Siderar and the steelworkers unions, for the period April
2011 March 2012.
We believe that Siderar maintains good relations with its unions, and the measures that it has
taken in order to make Siderar more competitive have not resulted in significant labor unrest.
In early 2009, following a decrease in the level of activity since the last quarter of 2008
due to the global economic downturn, Siderar downsized contractor and subcontractor activities
and temporary personnel, triggering adverse reactions from the construction workers union and
the steelworkers union. Later in 2009, during the negotiations between Siderar and the
steelworkers union regarding the annual bonuses related to results, the unions called for
work stoppages and other measures. These events have not had a significant impact on Siderars
operations. During 2010, the various measures that Siderar has taken in order to become more
competitive did not result in significant labor unrest.
Under Argentine law, Siderar is required to pay an amount equal to up to 23% of its employees
base salaries towards the social security system. Siderar must also withhold an additional
percentage from salaries for contribution to such funds up to a certain amount. As of March
2011, the maximum monthly amount from which social security contributions are withheld is
ARP13,879.33 (Law n° 26417 and its regulations). Part of those contributions finances a
state-controlled pension system. There are no mandatory company-supported pension plans.
Under Argentine labor laws, when an employee is dismissed without cause, an employer must pay
him or her severance equal to one month of its best, monthly and regular salary per each year
of service or fraction of more than three months, subject to certain floors and caps. In
addition, Siderar implemented an unfunded benefit plan for certain senior officers. The plan
is designed to provide certain benefits (additional to those contemplated under applicable
Argentine labor laws) in case of termination of the employment relationship due to certain
specified events, including retirement.
Colombia
Presently, Ferrasas employees are non-unionized workers. We believe that Ferrasa maintains
good relations with its employees. The measures that Ferrasa has taken in 2010 in order to
make it more competitive have not resulted in significant labor unrest.
Under Colombian labor laws, employers are required to pay its workers a monthly minimum wage,
which is increased by the government on an annual basis depending on the inflation rate in the
country during the previous year. In addition, labor laws provide for the payment of
transportation assistance and the supply of uniforms to those employees earning less than two
minimum monthly salaries. The minimum wage has increased, on average, 6.2% per year in the
period 2006-2010.
Under Colombian law, Ferrasa is required to pay an amount equal to 20.5% of its employees
base salaries towards the social security system. Ferrasa must also withhold 8.5% from
salaries for contribution to such funds. Those contributions finance a state-controlled
pension system. There are no mandatory company-supported pension plans.
Under Colombian labor laws, when an employee is dismissed without cause, an employer must pay
him or her severance equivalent to thirty days of wage for the first year of employment and
twenty days of wage per year of service thereafter if the worker earns less than ten minimum
monthly wages, or twenty days of wage for the first year of employment plus fifteen days of
wage per year of service thereafter if the worker earns ten minimum monthly wages or more.
83
To our knowledge, the total number of shares of the Company (including in the form of ADSs)
owned by our directors and executive officers as of March 31, 2011 was 1,097,560, which
represents 0.05% of our issued and outstanding shares. The following table provides
information regarding share ownership by our officers and directors.
|
|
|
|
|
Director or Officer |
|
Number of Shares
Held |
|
Adrián Lajous |
|
|
740,560 |
|
Daniel Novegil |
|
|
243,000 |
|
Paolo Bassetti |
|
|
67,000 |
|
Martín Berardi |
|
|
47,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1,097,560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 7. |
|
Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions |
The following table shows the
beneficial ownership of our securities (in the form of shares or ADSs) by (1) the Companys major shareholders
(persons or entities that own beneficially 5% or more of the Companys shares), (2) non-affiliated public
shareholders, and (3) the companys directors and senior management as a group. The information below is
based on the most recent information available to the Company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identity of Person or Group |
|
Number |
|
|
Percent |
|
Techint Holdings S.à r.l. (1) |
|
|
1,243,433,012 |
|
|
|
62.02 |
% |
Tenaris (2) |
|
|
229,713,194 |
|
|
|
11.46 |
% |
Ternium (3) |
|
|
41,666,666 |
|
|
|
2.08 |
% |
Directors and Senior Management as a group |
|
|
1,097,560 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
% |
Public |
|
|
488,833,010 |
|
|
|
24.38 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Techint Holdings S.à r.l. (Techint), formerly known as I.I.I. Industrial Investments Inc.,
is controlled by San Faustin S.A. (San Faustin), formerly known as San Faustin NV. Rocca &
Partners Stichting Administratiekantoor Aandelen San Faustin (RP STAK) holds shares in San
Faustin sufficient in number to control San Faustin and has the ability to influence
matters affecting, or submitted to a vote of, the shareholders of San
Faustin. Techint
transferred its domicile from the Cayman Islands to Luxembourg and San Faustin also
transferred its domicile from Curacao to Luxembourg. In connection with San Faustins 2011
redomiciliation, San Faustins controlling entity Rocca & Partners S.A. organized a Dutch
private foundation (Stichting) under the name of Rocca & Partners Stichting
Administratiekantoor Aandelen San Faustin (RP STAK). RP STAK holds shares in San Faustin
sufficient in number to control San Faustin. No person or group of persons controls RP
STAK. |
|
(2) |
|
Tenaris is controlled by Techint, which is controlled by San Faustin. RP STAK
controls a significant portion of the voting power of San Faustin and has the ability to
influence matters affecting, or submitted to a vote of, the shareholders of San Faustin. |
|
(3) |
|
Ternium holds its shares through its wholly-owned subsidiary Ternium International Inc
Panamá. |
On January 31, 2011, Ternium entered into a transaction and registration rights agreement with
its former shareholder Usiminas and Techint. The transaction and registration rights agreement
provided, among other things, for a SEC-registered underwritten public offering of up to all
of Ternium shares held by Usiminas (less the number of shares that Ternium and Techint agreed
to purchase as discussed below) in the form of ADSs listed on the New York Stock Exchange.
Neither Ternium nor Techint offered to sell any Ternium shares or ADSs in the public offering.
On February 9, 2011, Ternium and Techint, following the pricing of the underwritten public
offering mentioned above, entered into purchase agreements with Usiminas relating to their
concurrent purchase transactions of Ternium shares. Under these agreements, on February 15,
2011, Ternium and Techint purchased from Usiminas 41,666,666 and
27,777,780 Ternium shares for a total consideration of USD150 million and USD100 million,
respectively. In connection with the sale of Terniums shares by Usiminas, Ternium collected a
USD10.2 million fee and was reimbursed of all expenses relating to the offering and concurrent
purchase.
84
Following consummation of these transactions, Techint owns directly 62.02% of the Companys
share capital and Tenaris holds directly 11.46% of the Companys share capital (both including
treasury shares) and Usiminas no longer owns any Ternium shares. Also, upon completion of the
transaction, the two members of Companys board of directors nominated by Usiminas resigned
from Companys board.
As of May 31, 2011, 48,993,047 ADSs (representing 489,930,470 shares, or 24% of all
outstanding shares of the Company) were registered in the name of three record holders
resident in the United States, as informed by The Bank of New York Mellon.
The voting rights of our principal shareholders do not differ from the voting rights of other
shareholders. We are not aware of any arrangement which may at a later date result in a change
of control of the Company.
|
B. |
|
Related Party Transactions |
Ternium is a party to several related party transactions as described below. Material related
party transactions are subject to the review of the audit committee of the Companys board of
directors and the requirements of Luxembourg law. For further detail on the approval process
for related party transactions, see Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and EmployeesC.
Board PracticesAudit Committee.
As discussed elsewhere in this annual report, as from April 1, 2008, the Company ceased
consolidating Sidors results of operations and cash flows, with Sidors results and cash
flows during each period prior to April 1, 2008 being presented as discontinued operations.
The transactions between Sidor and related parties for periods prior to April 1, 2008 are
shown separately. For more information, see note 29 to our audited consolidated financial
statements included elsewhere in this annual report.
Purchases of Raw Materials
In the ordinary course of business, Ternium buys raw materials and other production inputs
from subsidiaries of Tenaris. These purchases are made on similar terms and conditions to
those purchases made by the Ternium companies from unrelated third parties. These transactions
include:
|
|
|
purchase of ferrous scrap and other raw material, which amounted to USD29.5 million
in 2010, USD14.3 million in 2009 and USD28.8 million in 2008; and |
|
|
|
purchase of steam and operational services from the Argentine electric power
generating facility of Siderca for Siderar in San Nicolás. These purchases amounted to
USD14.1 million in 2010, USD13.6 million in 2009 and USD22.3 million in 2008. |
Sales of Steel Products and Raw Materials
In the ordinary course of business, Ternium sells flat steel products, steel bars and other
raw materials to subsidiaries of Tenaris. These transactions include:
|
|
|
sales of flat steel products to be used in the production of welded pipes and
accessories, which amounted to USD126.5 million in 2010, USD24.7 million in 2009 and
USD91.6 million in 2008; |
|
|
|
sales of metal building components for a new rolling mill, which amounted to
USD18.7 million in 2010 and USD4.4 million in 2009; and |
|
|
|
sales of pig iron, DRI, scrap, pellets and other raw materials to be used in the
production of seamless pipes, which amounted to USD20.1 million in 2010, USD8.9 million
in 2009 and USD16.8 million in 2008. |
In certain circumstances, Ternium sells steel products to other companies in the Techint
group. These sales amounted to USD2.5 million in 2010, USD1.0 million in 2009 and USD100,000
in 2008.
All these sales are made on similar terms and conditions to those sales made by Ternium to
unrelated third parties.
85
Purchase Agency Services
Exiros, in which the Company has a 50% share ownership and Tenaris has the remaining 50% share
ownership, provides purchase agency services to us, and to Tenaris subsidiaries. In
connection with Exiros services, Ternium paid fees amounting to USD28.9 million in 2010,
USD23.6 million in 2009 and USD24.2 million in 2008.
Supply of Natural Gas
Siderar has natural gas supply agreements with Tecpetrol and Energy Consulting Services, and
natural gas transportation agreements with TGN and Litoral Gas. Tecpetrol is a company
controlled by San Faustin, engaged in oil and gas exploration and production and has rights to
various oil and gas fields in Argentina and elsewhere in Latin America. TGN operates two major
pipelines in Argentina connecting the major gas basins of Neuquén and Noroeste-Bolivia to the
major consumption centers in Argentina. Litoral Gas is a company that distributes gas in the
Province of Santa Fe and in the northeastern section of the Province of Buenos Aires. Energy
Consulting Services is a company engaged in energy and management consulting, representing one
of the major and most reliable natural gas traders in Argentina. San Faustin holds significant
but non-controlling interests in TGN, Litoral Gas and Energy Consulting Services.
Tecpetrol supplies natural gas at prices and on terms and conditions that are equivalent to
those charged by Siderars other suppliers of natural gas. Tecpetrols sales to Siderar
amounted to USD4.3 million in 2010, USD2.4 million in 2009 and USD1.3 million in 2008.
TGN charges Siderar a price to transport its natural gas supplies that is equivalent, on a
comparable basis, to prices paid by other industrial users. The Argentine government regulates
the general framework under which TGN operates and prices its services. TGNs sales to Ternium
amounted to USD1.8 million in 2010, USD2.0 million in 2009 and USD9.6 million in 2008.
Litoral Gas distributes gas to Siderars northern plants. Litoral Gas sales to Ternium
totaled USD1.1 million in 2010, USD1.3 million in 2009 and USD600,000 in 2008.
Energy Consulting Services provides Siderar with natural gas. Energy Consulting Services sales
amounted to USD3.0 million in 2009 and USD30,000 in 2008.
Provision of Engineering and Labor Services
Ternium contracts with certain companies controlled by San Faustin specialized in supplying
engineering services, construction services, labor and supervision services, for civil and
electromechanical works, and cleaning, general maintenance and handling of by-products
services. Fees accrued for these services amounted to USD104.5 million in 2010, USD87.1
million in 2009 and USD162.1 million in 2008.
Sales and Purchases of Other Products and Services
Ternium entered into other transactions with companies controlled by San Faustin. The most
important ones include purchase of plant equipment and spare parts from Tenova S.p.A.
(formerly Techint Compagnia Tecnica Internazionale) and other related companies, which
amounted to USD6.5 million in 2010, USD300,000 in 2009 and USD5.2 million in 2008.
Administrative Services
Finma S.A., a company owned by various Techint group companies, provides administrative and
legal support services to Techint group companies, including Siderar. Siderar has a 33.33%
participation in Finma S.A.s share capital. Fees accrued by Finma S.A. amounted to USD10.0
million in 2010, USD7.8 million in 2009 and USD8.6 million in 2008.
Other Transactions
Ternium sold welded steel pipes to Tenaris as part of orders to a Tenaris customer for an
amount of USD4.5 million in 2010, USD1.9 million in 2009 and USD500,000 in 2008. In the
ordinary course of business, from time to time, Ternium carries out other transactions and
enters into other arrangements with Techint group companies, none of which are believed to be
material.
86
Transactions between Sidor and related parties prior to April 1, 2008
As from April 1, 2008, the Company ceased consolidating Sidors results of operations and cash
flows, with Sidors results and cash flows during each period prior to April 1, 2008 being
presented as discontinued operations. The transactions between Sidor and related parties
during the first quarter of 2008 are shown below:
Purchases of Raw Materials. Sidor bought ferrous scrap from a subsidiary of Tenaris in
Venezuela for an amount of USD0.5 million in the first quarter of 2008.
Sales of Steel Products and Raw Materials. Sidor sold flat steel products, steel bars and raw
materials to subsidiaries of Tenaris. These transactions included:
|
|
|
sales of flat steel products to be used in the production of welded pipes and
accessories, which amounted to USD10.0 million in the first quarter of 2008; and |
|
|
|
sales of steel bars to be used in the production of seamless pipes, which amounted
to USD4.6 million in the first quarter of 2008. |
Transactions with Matesi. Sidor established Matesi jointly with a subsidiary of Tenaris to
operate an HBI production facility in Venezuela. As of March 31, 2008, Sidor held 49.8% of
Matesi, while Tenaris held the remaining 50.2%. Transactions associated with this operation
included:
|
|
|
purchases of HBI pursuant to an off-take agreement, which amounted to USD7.9
million in the first quarter of 2008. The agreement established that Matesi was required
to sell to Sidor, on a take-or-pay basis, 29.9% of Matesis HBI production, or up to
49.8% at the election of Sidor; |
|
|
|
during 2004, Sidor entered into a management assistance agreement with Matesi. As
part of this agreement, Sidor received fees from Matesi totaling USD0.1 million in the
first quarter of 2008, related to the provision of managerial services; |
|
|
|
as part of the investment agreement to finance the acquisition of Matesis assets
and its start-up, in July 2004 Sidor granted a loan to Matesi for an outstanding amount
at March 31, 2008, of USD26.8 million. This loan bore interest at a rate of LIBOR plus
2%. Interest earned on this loan amounted to USD0.5 million during the first quarter of
2008; |
|
|
|
during 2007, Sidor entered into a Service Agreement with Matesi under which Matesi
recycled pellets from Sidor into HBI. Sidor paid USD4.5 million in the first quarter of
2008 pursuant to this agreement. |
Provision of Engineering and Labor Services. Sidor contracted with certain Techint group
companies engineering services, construction services, specialized labor and supervision
services, for civil and electromechanical works, and cleaning, general maintenance and
handling of by-products services. Fees accrued for these services amounted to USD10.7 million
in the first quarter of 2008.
Sales and Purchases of Other Products and Services. Sidor entered into other transactions with
Techint group companies, the most important of which was the purchase of plant equipment and
spare parts from Tenova S.p.A. (formerly Techint Compagnia Tecnica Internazionale) and other
related companies, which amounted to USD5.9 million in the first quarter of 2008. In the
ordinary course of business, from time to time prior to April 1, 2008, Sidor carried out other
transactions and entered into other arrangements with Techint group companies, none of which
are believed to have been material.
|
C. |
|
Interest of Experts and Counsel |
Not applicable.
87
|
|
|
Item 8. |
|
Financial Information |
|
A. |
|
Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information |
See
Item 18 and pages F-1 through F-56 for our audited consolidated financial statements.
Legal Proceedings
Outstanding Legal Proceedings
The following legal proceedings were outstanding as of the date of this report:
Tax matters relating to Siderar
The Administración Federal de Ingresos Públicos (AFIP), the Argentine tax authority, has
challenged the charge to income of certain disbursements that Siderar has treated as expenses
necessary to maintain industrial installations, which as such should be deducted in the year
in which they take place. The AFIP asserts that these are investments or improvements that
must be capitalized and, therefore, it made a jeopardy assessment income tax due on a nominal
tax basis plus fines and interest in fiscal years 1995 to 1999 amounting to approximately
USD19.2 million as of December 31, 2010. Siderar appealed these assessments before the
National Tax Court. On April 13, 2005, Siderar was notified of a ruling issued by the National
Tax Court reducing the assessments made by the AFIP for fiscal years 1995 and 1996. The ruling
was appealed both by Siderar and the AFIP. On June 10, 2010, the Company was notified of a
ruling issued by the Court of Appeals in federal administrative law which mainly resulted in
favor of Siderar. The ruling was appealed both by Siderar and the AFIP. Based on the above,
Siderar recognized a provision amounting to USD2.1 million as of December 31, 2010 as
management considers there could be a potential cash outflow.
Previously Reported Legal Proceedings
The following previously reported legal proceedings were terminated, settled or otherwise
disposed of during the year covered by this report or during 2011 through the date of this
annual report:
Corus arbitration proceedings
Grupo Imsa (now Ternium Mexico), together with Marcegaglia, Duferco International Investment
Holding and Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., were parties to a ten-year steel slab off-take framework
agreement with Corus UK Limited (now Tata Steel UK Limited) dated as of December 16, 2004,
which was supplemented by bilateral off-take agreements. Under the agreements, the off-takers
could be required to purchase, in the aggregate, approximately 78% of the steel slab
production of Corus former Teesside facility in the North East of England, of which Grupo
Imsas share was 15.38%, or approximately 0.5 million tons per year, of the total production.
In addition, the off-takers were required to make, in the aggregate and according to their
respective pro rata shares, significant payments to Corus to finance capital expenditures. In
December 2007, all of Grupo Imsas rights and obligations under this contract were assigned to
Ternium Procurement S.A. (formerly known as Alvory S.A.).
On April 7, 2009, Ternium Procurement S.A., together with the other off-takers, declared the
early termination of the off-take framework agreement and their respective off-take agreements
with Corus pursuant to a provision allowing the off-takers to terminate the agreements upon
the occurrence of certain events specified in the off-take framework agreement. Corus
initially denied the occurrence of the alleged termination event, stated that it would pursue
specific performance and initiated an arbitration proceeding against the off-takers and
Ternium Mexico (as guarantor of Ternium Procurements obligations) seeking damages arising out
of the alleged wrongful termination of the off-take agreements, which damages Corus did not
quantify but stated that would exceed USD150 million (approximately USD29.7 million in the
case of Ternium Procurement), the maximum aggregate cap on liability that the off-takers would
have under the off-take framework agreement (a limitation that Corus disputed). In addition,
Corus threatened to submit to arbitration further claims in tort against the off-takers, and
also threatened to submit such claims against certain third-parties to such agreements,
including the Company. The off-takers and Ternium Mexico, in turn, denied Corus claims and
brought counterclaims against Corus which, in the aggregate, would also be greater than USD150
million.
On May 12, 2009, Corus, by a letter from its lawyers, alleged that the off-takerss
termination notice amounted to a repudiatory breach of the agreements and stated that it
accepted that the agreements had come to an end and that it would no longer pursue a claim for
specific performance in the arbitration; the claim for damages, for all losses caused by the
alleged off-takers wrongful repudiation of the agreements, however, would be maintained. On
July 9, 2009, Corus submitted an amended request for arbitration adding tortious claims
against the off-takers and adding to its claims the payment of punitive or exemplary damages.
88
On December 21, 2010, the arbitration tribunal issued a partial final award where it held that
the off-takers had invalidly terminated the off-take agreements. The tribunal also held that
the maximum aggregate USD150 million liability cap (out of which approximately USD29.7 million
corresponds to Ternium Procurement) provided in the off-take framework agreement applied to
all of Coruss claims against the off-takers, including tort as well as contract claims. The
tribunal formally admitted new claims and counterclaims into the arbitration proceedings on
April 10, 2011.
On April 15, 2011, the arbitration tribunal issued a second partial final award where it held
that the off-takers should pay to the claimant GBP 1.6 million for its reasonable legal and
other costs incurred before the first partial final award. The off-takers paid that amount
around mid May. In addition, on May 27, 2011, the off-takers paid to Tata an aggregate amount
of USD16.3 million (of which Ternium Procurement paid USD 3.2 million) as indemnification for
one of its claims under the arbitration proceedings.
On June 16, 2011, Tata, the off-takers and Ternium Mexico settled the dispute, and the
off-takers, in exchange for a full release and discharge of each of them and their respective
representatives and affiliates, from all claims and disputes that Tata may have against any of
them in relation to the off-take framework agreement and its related agreements, agreed to pay
to Tata an aggregate amount of USD124 million (including the USD16.3 million previously paid)
and authorized their agent under the off-take agreements to transfer to Tata UK£1.8 million
and 0.5 million which had been received by the agent from the off-takers under the off-take
framework agreement before the early termination of such agreement. Ternium Procurement paid
to Tata its share of the settlement amount (i.e., USD21.3 million) on June 17, 2011. On June
21, 2011, Tata notified the arbitration tribunal that the arbitration proceedings were
withdrawn. See note 37 to our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in
this annual report.
Dividend Policy
We do not have, and have no current plans to establish, a formal dividend policy governing the
amount and payment of dividends or other distributions. The amount and payment of dividends
will be determined by a simple majority vote at a general shareholders meeting, typically,
but not necessarily, based on the recommendation of the Companys board of directors. All
shares of the Companys share capital rank pari passu with respect to the payment of
dividends.
The following table shows the dividends approved by the Companys shareholders since its
incorporation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approved dividend |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Per share |
|
|
Per ADS |
|
|
|
|
Shareholders meeting date |
|
(USD million) |
|
|
(USD) |
|
|
(USD) |
|
|
Dividend payment date |
June 6, 2007 |
|
|
100.2 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
0.50 |
|
|
June 12, 2007 |
June 4, 2008 |
|
|
100.2 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
0.50 |
|
|
June 12, 2008 |
June 3, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/a |
June 2, 2010 |
|
|
100.2 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
0.50 |
|
|
June 10, 2010 |
June 1, 2011 |
|
|
150.4 |
|
|
|
0.075 |
|
|
|
0.75 |
|
|
June 9, 2011 |
We conduct all of our operations through subsidiaries and, accordingly, our main source of
cash to pay dividends is the dividends received from our subsidiaries. See Item 3. Key
InformationD. Risk FactorsRisks Relating to the Structure of the CompanyAs a holding
company, the Companys ability to pay cash dividends depends on the results of operations and
financial condition of its subsidiaries and could be restricted by legal, contractual or other
limitations. These dividend payments will likely depend on our subsidiaries results of
operations, financial condition, cash and capital requirements, future growth prospects and
other factors deemed significant by their respective boards of directors, as well as on any
applicable legal restrictions. See Item 3. Key InformationD. Risk FactorsRisks Relating
to the Countries in Which We OperateArgentina and Item 10. Additional InformationB.
Memorandum and Articles of AssociationDividends for a discussion of the current
restrictions on the payment of dividends.
Pursuant to our articles of association, the board of directors has the power to distribute
interim dividends in accordance with applicable Luxembourg law, but dividend payments must be
approved by our shareholders at the annual general meeting, subject to the approval of our
annual accounts. Dividends may be lawfully declared and paid if our net profits and
distributable reserves are sufficient under Luxembourg law.
89
Under Luxembourg law, at least 5% of our net profits per year must be allocated to the
creation of a legal reserve until such reserve has reached an amount equal to 10% of our
issued share capital. If the legal reserve later falls below the 10% threshold, at least 5% of
net profits again must be allocated toward the reserve. The Companys legal reserve
represented 10% of its share capital as of December 31, 2010. The legal reserve is not
available for distribution.
Except as otherwise disclosed in this annual report, there has been no undisclosed significant
change since the date of the annual financial statements.
|
|
|
Item 9. |
|
The Offer and Listing |
|
A. |
|
Offer and Listing Details |
The Companys ADSs are listed on the NYSE under the symbol TX. Trading on the NYSE began on
February 1, 2006. As of June 6, 2011, a total of 2,004,743,442 shares were registered in the
Companys shareholder register.
As of May 31, 2011, a total of 489,930,470 shares were registered in the name of the
depositary for the Companys ADR program. On June 16, 2011, the closing price for the
Companys ADSs reported by the NYSE was USD28.46.
New York Stock Exchange
As of May 31, 2011, a total of 48,993,047 ADSs were registered of record. Each ADS represents
10 shares of the Companys share capital. The Bank of New York Mellon acts as the Companys
depositary for issuing ADRs evidencing the ADSs. The following tables set forth, for the
periods indicated, the high and low daily quoted prices for the Companys shares, in the form
of ADSs, as reported by NYSE.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price per ADS |
|
Full Financial Years Since Listing |
|
High |
|
|
Low |
|
2006 |
|
|
30.00 |
|
|
|
20.15 |
|
2007 |
|
|
41.23 |
|
|
|
24.01 |
|
2008 |
|
|
45.18 |
|
|
|
4.65 |
|
2009 |
|
|
35.61 |
|
|
|
5.76 |
|
2010 |
|
|
43.07 |
|
|
|
29.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price per ADS |
|
Full Financial Quarters in 2009 |
|
High |
|
|
Low |
|
First quarter |
|
|
11.14 |
|
|
|
5.76 |
|
Second quarter |
|
|
18.64 |
|
|
|
7.05 |
|
Third quarter |
|
|
27.71 |
|
|
|
17.24 |
|
Fourth quarter |
|
|
35.61 |
|
|
|
23.63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price per ADS |
|
Full Financial Quarters in 2010 |
|
High |
|
|
Low |
|
First quarter |
|
|
41.34 |
|
|
|
29.16 |
|
Second quarter |
|
|
43.05 |
|
|
|
29.78 |
|
Third quarter |
|
|
37.94 |
|
|
|
30.87 |
|
Fourth quarter |
|
|
43.07 |
|
|
|
32.55 |
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price per ADS |
|
Last Six Months |
|
High |
|
|
Low |
|
January 2011 |
|
|
43.26 |
|
|
|
38.30 |
|
February 2011 |
|
|
40.01 |
|
|
|
35.21 |
|
March 2011 |
|
|
36.93 |
|
|
|
33.78 |
|
April 2011 |
|
|
36.61 |
|
|
|
32.55 |
|
May 2011 |
|
|
33.56 |
|
|
|
30.53 |
|
June 1 to June 16, 2011 |
|
|
30.55 |
|
|
|
28.46 |
|
|
|
|
Not applicable. |
|
|
C. |
|
Markets |
|
|
|
|
See A. Offer and Listing Details. |
|
D. |
|
Selling Shareholders |
|
|
|
|
Not applicable. |
|
|
E. |
|
Dilution |
|
|
|
|
Not applicable. |
|
F. |
|
Expenses of the Issue |
|
|
|
|
Not applicable. |
Item 10. Additional Information
|
A. |
|
Share Capital |
|
|
|
|
Not applicable. |
|
|
B. |
|
Memorandum and Articles of Association |
|
|
|
|
General |
The following is a summary of certain rights of holders of the Companys shares. These rights
are set out in the Companys articles of association or are provided by applicable Luxembourg
law, and may differ from those typically provided to shareholders of U.S. companies under the
corporation laws of some states of the United States of America. This summary is not
exhaustive and does not contain all information that may be important to you. For more
complete information, you should read the Companys articles of association, which are
attached as an exhibit to this annual report.
The Company is a public limited liability company (société anonyme) organized under the laws
of Luxembourg. Its object and purpose, as set forth in Article 2 of its articles of
association, is the taking of interests, in any form, in corporations or other business
entities, and the administration, management, control and development thereof. The Company is
registered under the number B98 668 in the Registre du Commerce et des Sociétés.
The Companys authorized share capital is fixed by the Companys articles of association, as
amended from time to time, with the approval of shareholders at an extraordinary general
shareholders meeting. The Company has an authorized share capital of a single class of 3.5
billion shares having a nominal value of USD1.00 per share. The general extraordinary meeting
of shareholders held on June 2, 2010, renewed the validity of the Companys authorized
share capital until July 15, 2015. As of June 6, 2011, there were 2,004,743,442 shares issued.
All issued shares are fully paid.
91
The Companys articles of association authorized the board of directors or any delegate(s)
duly appointed by the board of directors, to issue shares within the limits of its authorized
share capital against contributions in cash, contributions in kind or by way of incorporation
of available reserves, at such times and on such terms and conditions as the board of
directors or its delegates may determine. The extraordinary general meeting of shareholders
held on June 2, 2010 renewed this authorization until July 15, 2015.
The Companys shareholders have authorized the board of directors to waive, suppress or limit
any pre-emptive subscription rights of shareholders provided for by law to the extent it deems
such waiver, suppression or limitation advisable for any issue or issues of shares within the
authorized share capital. However, if and from the date the Companys shares are listed on a
regulated market (and only for as long as they are so listed), any issuance of shares for cash
within the limits of the authorized share capital shall be subject to the pre-emptive
subscription rights of the then existing shareholders (as set out in the articles of
association), except in the following cases (in which cases no pre-emptive rights shall
apply):
|
(a) |
|
any issuance of shares for, within, in conjunction with or related to, an initial
public offering of the Companys shares on one or more regulated markets (in one or more
instances); |
|
(b) |
|
any issuance of shares against a contribution other than in cash; |
|
(c) |
|
any issuance of shares upon conversion of convertible bonds or other instruments
convertible into shares; provided, however, that the pre-emptive subscription rights of
the then existing shareholders shall apply by provision of the Companys articles of
association in connection with any issuance of convertible bonds or other instruments
convertible into shares for cash; and |
|
(d) |
|
any issuance of shares (including by way of free shares or at a discount), up to an
amount of 1.5% of the issued share capital of the Company, to directors, officers, agents
or employees of the Company, its direct or indirect subsidiaries, or its Affiliates (as
such term is defined in the Companys articles of association), including without
limitation the direct issue of shares upon the exercise of options, rights convertible
into shares, or similar instruments convertible or exchangeable into shares issued for
the purpose of, or in relation to, compensation or incentive of any such persons. |
Dividends
Subject to applicable law, all shares (including shares underlying ADSs) are entitled to
participate equally in dividends when, as and if declared by the shareholders at the ordinary
general shareholders meeting, out of funds legally available for such purposes. Under
Luxembourg law, claims for dividends will lapse five years after the date such dividends are
declared. However, we may elect to pay a declared dividend after such period. The shareholders
may, at the ordinary general shareholders meeting, which every shareholder has the right to
attend in person or by proxy, declare a dividend under Article 21 of the Companys articles of
association.
Under Article 21 of the articles of association, the Companys board of directors has the
power to distribute interim dividends in accordance with the conditions that apply to
commercial companies set forth in particular in Section 72-2 of the Luxembourg law of August
10, 1915, on commercial companies.
Pursuant to Luxembourg law, at least 5% of our net profits per year must be allocated to the
creation of a legal reserve until such reserve has reached an amount equal to 10% of our
issued share capital. If the legal reserve later falls below the 10% threshold, at least 5%
(or such lower amount required to reach the 10% threshold) of net profits again must be
allocated toward the reserve. The Companys legal reserve represented 10% of its share capital
as of December 31, 2010. The legal reserve is not available for distribution.
92
Voting Rights; Shareholders Meetings; Election of Directors
Each share entitles the holder to one vote at the Companys general shareholders meetings.
Shareholder action by written consent is not permitted, but proxy voting is permitted. Notices
of general shareholders meetings are governed by the provisions of Luxembourg law and the
Companys articles of association. Notices of such meetings must be
published twice, at least at eight-day intervals, the second notice appearing at least eight
days prior to the meeting, in the Luxembourg Official Gazette and in a leading newspaper
having general circulation in Luxembourg. If an extraordinary general shareholders meeting is
adjourned for lack of a quorum, notices must be published twice, in the Luxembourg Official
Gazette and two Luxembourg newspapers, at 15-day intervals, the second notice appearing at
least 15 days prior to the meeting. In case the Companys shares are listed on a foreign
regulated market, notices of general shareholders meetings shall also be published in
accordance with the publicity requirements of such regulated market. No attendance quorum is
required at annual ordinary general shareholders meetings and resolutions are adopted by a
simple majority vote of the shares present or represented and voted at the meeting. An
extraordinary general shareholders meeting must have a quorum of at least 50% of the issued
and outstanding shares. If a quorum is not reached, such meeting may be reconvened at a later
date with no quorum requirements by means of the appropriate notification procedures provided
for by Luxembourg company law. In both cases, Luxembourg company law and the Companys
articles of association require that any resolution of an extraordinary general shareholders
meeting be adopted by a two-thirds majority vote of the shares present or represented. If a
proposed resolution consists of changing the Companys nationality or of increasing the
shareholders commitments, the unanimous consent of all shareholders is required. Directors
are elected at annual ordinary general shareholders meetings. Cumulative voting is not
permitted. As the Companys articles of association do not provide for staggered terms,
directors are elected for a maximum of one year and may be reappointed or removed at any time,
with or without cause, by resolution passed by a simple majority vote of the shares present or
represented and voted. In the case of a vacancy occurring in the board of directors, the
remaining directors shall have the right to temporarily fill such vacancy by the affirmative
vote of a majority of the remaining directors. The term of a temporary director elected to
fill a vacancy shall expire at the end of the term of office of the replaced director;
provided however that the next shareholders meeting shall be called upon to proceed with the
definitive election of any temporary member of the board of directors so elected.
The Companys articles of association provide that annual ordinary general shareholders
meetings, at which its annual financial statements are approved and the members of its board
of directors are appointed, must take place in Luxembourg on the first Wednesday of every May
at 2:30 p.m., Luxembourg time. If that day is a legal or banking holiday in Luxembourg, the
meeting shall be held on the following business day.
Any shareholder who holds one or more shares of the Company on the fifth calendar day
preceding the general shareholders meeting (the Record Date) shall be admitted to a general
shareholders meeting. Those shareholders who have sold their shares between the Record Date
and the date of the general shareholders meeting, may not attend or be represented at the
meeting.
In the case of shares held through fungible securities accounts, each shareholder may exercise
all rights attached to his shares and, in particular, may participate in and vote at
shareholders meetings of the Company upon presentation of a certificate issued by the
financial institution or professional depositary holding the shares, evidencing such deposit
and certifying the number of shares recorded in the relevant account on the Record Date. Such
certificate must be filed at least five days before the meeting with the Company at its
registered address or at the address stated in the convening notice or, in case the shares of
the Company are listed on a regulated market, with an agent of the Company located in the
country of the listing and designated in the convening notice. In case any such holder wishes
to vote by proxy, the holder shall have to present a completed proxy form together with the
certificate previously referred, by the same date and time and at the same addresses.
The board of directors and the shareholders meeting may, if they deem so advisable, reduce
these periods of time for all shareholders and admit all shareholders (or their proxies) who
have filed the appropriate documents to the general shareholders meeting, irrespective of
these time limits.
Holders of ADSs only have those rights that are expressly granted to them in the deposit
agreement dated as of January 31, 2006 among the Company, The Bank of New York Mellon
(formerly The Bank of New York), as depositary, and all owners and beneficial owners from time
to time of ADRs of the Company. ADS holders may not attend or directly exercise voting rights
in shareholders meetings, but may instruct the depositary how to exercise the voting rights
for the shares which underline their ADSs.
Access to Corporate Records
Luxembourg law and the Companys articles of association do not generally provide for
shareholder access to corporate records. Shareholders may inspect the annual accounts and
auditors reports at the Companys registered office during the fifteen-day period prior to a
general shareholders meeting.
93
Appraisal Rights
In case the shares of the Company are listed on one or more regulated markets, and in the
event the shareholders, in a general meeting, approve any of the following:
|
|
|
the delisting of the Companys shares from all regulated markets where the
Companys shares are listed at that time, excluding a delisting made pursuant to an offer
to all of the Companys shareholders made by a business entity subject to common control
with the Company, whereby such business entity offers to issue, in exchange for the
Companys shares, shares to be listed on the same regulated market(s) on which the
Companys shares are listed; |
|
|
|
a merger in which the Company is not the surviving entity (unless the shares or
other equity securities of such entity are listed on the New York or London stock
exchanges); |
|
|
|
a sale, lease, exchange or other disposition of all or substantially all of the
Companys assets; |
|
|
|
an amendment to the Companys articles of association that has the effect of
materially changing its corporate purpose; |
|
|
|
the relocation of the Companys domicile outside the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg; or |
|
|
|
amendments to the Companys articles of association that restrict the rights of its
shareholders (excluding any amendments in relation with, or to, the authorized share
capital and/or the waiver or suppression of any preferential subscription rights relating
thereto); |
dissenting or absent shareholders have the right to have their shares repurchased by the
Company at (i) the average market value of the shares over the 90 calendar days preceding the
applicable general shareholders meeting or (ii) in the event that the Companys shares are
not traded on any regulated market, the amount that results from applying the proportion of
the Companys equity that the shares being sold represent over the Companys net worth as
determined in its last consolidated financial statements approved by the shareholders or in
its last interim consolidated financial statements approved by the board of directors,
whichever is more recent. Shareholders who voted in favor of the relevant resolution are not
entitled to exercise this right.
Dissenting or absent shareholders must present their claim within one month following the date
of the applicable general shareholders meeting and supply the Company with evidence of their
shareholding at the time of such meeting. The Company must (to the extent permitted by
applicable laws and regulations and in compliance therewith) repurchase its shares within six
months following the date of the applicable general shareholders meeting. If delisting from
one or more, but not all, of the regulated markets where the Companys shares are listed is
approved by the shareholders meeting, only dissenting or absent shareholders with shares held
through participants in the local clearing system for that market or those markets can
exercise this appraisal right if:
|
|
|
they held the shares as of the date of the announcement by the Company of its
intention to delist or as of the date of publication of the first convening notice for
the general shareholders meeting that approved the delisting; |
|
|
|
they present their claim within one month following the date of the general
shareholders meeting and supply evidence of their shareholding as of the date of the
Companys announcement or the publication of the first convening notice to the meeting;
and |
|
|
|
the delisting is not being made pursuant to an offer to all of the Companys
shareholders made by a business entity subject to common control with the Company,
whereby such business entity offers to issue, in exchange for the Companys shares,
shares to be listed on the same regulated market(s) on which such dissenting or absent
shareholders hold their shares through participants in the local clearing system for that
market or markets. |
In the event a shareholder exercises its appraisal right, applicable Luxembourg law provisions
shall apply.
94
Distribution of Assets on Winding-up
In the event of the Companys liquidation, dissolution or winding-up, the net assets remaining
after allowing for the payment of all debts, charges and expenses shall be paid out to holders
of the Companys shares in proportion to their respective holdings.
Transferability and Form
The Companys articles of association do not impose restrictions on the transfer of its
shares. The shares are issuable in registered form only.
Pursuant to the Companys articles of association, the ownership of registered shares is
evidenced by the inscription of the name of the shareholder, the number of shares held by such
shareholder and the amount paid on each share in the Companys shareholders register. In
addition, the Companys articles of association provide that shares may be held through
fungible securities accounts with financial institutions or other professional depositaries.
Shares held through fungible securities accounts have the same rights and obligations as
shares recorded in the Companys shareholders register.
Shares held through fungible securities accounts may be transferred in accordance with
customary procedures for the transfer of securities in book-entry form. Shares that are not
held through fungible securities accounts may be transferred by a written statement of
transfer signed by both the transferor and the transferee or their respective duly appointed
attorney-in-fact and recorded in the Companys shareholders register. The transfer of shares
may also be made in accordance with the provisions of Article 1690 of the Luxembourg Civil
Code. As evidence of the transfer of registered shares, the Company may also accept any
correspondence or other documents evidencing the agreement between transferor and transferee
as to the transfer of registered shares.
BNP Paribas Securities Services, Luxembourg Branch, maintains the Companys shareholders
register.
Repurchase of Company Shares
The Company may repurchase its own shares in the cases and subject to the conditions set by
the Luxembourg law of August 10, 1915, as amended, and, in the case of acquisitions of shares
or ADSs made through NYSE, with any applicable laws and regulations of such market. See Item
16.E Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers for further
information on the authorization granted on June 2, 2010, by the Companys annual general
shareholders meeting to the Company or its subsidiaries to repurchase the Companys shares,
including shares represented by ADRs.
Limitation on Securities Ownership
There are no limitations currently imposed by Luxembourg law or the articles of association on
the rights of non-resident shareholders to hold or vote the Companys shares.
Change in Control
None of our outstanding securities has any special control rights. The Companys articles of
association do not contain any provision that would have the effect of delaying, deferring or
preventing a change in control of the Company and that would operate only with respect to a
merger, acquisition or corporate restructuring involving the Company. In addition, the Company
does not know of any significant agreements or other arrangements to which the Company is a
party and which take effect, alter or terminate in the event of a change of control of the
Company.
There are no rights associated with the Companys shares other than those described above.
For a summary of any material contract entered into by us outside of the ordinary course of
business during the last two years, see Item 4. Information on the CompanyB. Business
OverviewRaw Materials, Energy and Other Inputs. For a summary of the notes evidencing CVGs
indebtedness to the Company in connection with the Sidor nationalization process, see note 29
to our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report.
95
Many of the countries which are important markets for us or in which we have substantial
assets have a history of substantial government intervention in currency markets, volatile
exchange rates and government-imposed currency controls. These include Mexico, Argentina and
Colombia. Currently, only Argentina has exchange controls or limitations on capital
flowsincluding requirements for the repatriation of export proceedsin place.
Mexico
Between November 1991 and December 1994, the Mexican Central Bank maintained the exchange rate
between the U.S. dollar and the Mexican peso within a predetermined range through intervention
in the foreign exchange market. The Mexican Central Bank intervened in the foreign exchange
market as the exchange rate reached either the minimum or the maximum of the predetermined
range in order to reduce day-to-day fluctuations in the exchange rate. On December 20, 1994,
the Mexican government modified the predetermined range within which the Mexican peso was
permitted to float by increasing the maximum Mexican peso price of the U.S. dollar by MXN0.53,
which implied an effective 15% devaluation of the Mexican peso from December 19 to December
21, 1994. On December 22, 1994, the Mexican government suspended intervention by the Mexican
Central Bank in the foreign exchange market and allowed the Mexican peso to float freely
against the U.S. dollar. Factors that contributed to this decision included the size of
Mexicos current account deficit, a decline in the Mexican Central Banks foreign exchange
reserves, rising interest rates for other currencies (especially the U.S. dollar) and reduced
confidence in the Mexican economy on the part of investors due to political uncertainty
associated with events in the state of Chiapas and presidential and congressional elections in
that year. The value of the Mexican peso suffered a steep deterioration against the U.S.
dollar, declining by 43% from December 19, 1994 to December 31, 1994. The Mexican government
has since allowed the Mexican peso to float freely against the U.S. dollar. Since September
2008 until March 2009, the value of the Mexican peso against the U.S. dollar declined rapidly
mainly as a consecuence of the global economic downturn. Since March 2009, the Mexican peso
partly recovered its losses mainly reflecting the subsequent recovery of the economic
activity. Throughout 2008, the Mexican peso suffered 25% devaluation with respect to the U.S.
dollar, while throughout 2009 and 2010 it appreciated 4% and 5%, respectively.
Historically, the Mexican economy has suffered balance of payment deficits and shortages in
foreign exchange reserves. While the Mexican government does not currently restrict the
ability of Mexican or foreign persons or entities to convert Mexican pesos to U.S. dollars and
the terms of NAFTAto which Mexico is a signatory generally prohibit exchange controls, the
Mexican government could institute a restrictive exchange control policy in the future.
For additional information regarding factors affecting the value of the Mexican peso, see Item
3. Key InformationD. Risk FactorsRisks Relating to the Countries in Which We
OperateMexico.
Argentina
Since 2002, the Argentine government has maintained a dirty float of the peso. In addition,
following the enactment of the Public Emergency and Foreign Exchange System Reform Law No.
25,562 in January 2002, several rules and regulations have been introduced to reduce
volatility in the ARP/USD exchange rate. Below is a summary of the principal limitations on
the transfer of foreign currency in and out of Argentina:
|
|
|
the proceeds of certain foreign financial debt incurred by Argentine residents
(including private Argentine entities) as well as certain inflows for the purpose of
investments in the capital markets must remain in Argentina for at least 365 calendar
days and, with certain exceptions, 30% of the amount of off-shore
proceeds must be
deposited in a non-transferable, non-interest bearing account with an Argentine bank.
This deposit must be held for a period of 365 calendar days and may not be used as
collateral in any credit transaction; |
|
|
|
outflows from proceeds of investments in capital markets are restricted and subject
to certain requirements, such as, in certain cases, the mantainance of the investment for
a specific period of time; |
|
|
|
inflows and outflows of foreign currency through the local exchange market, and
indebtedness transactions by local residents that may result in a foreign currency
payment to non-residents, must be registered with the Argentine Central Bank; and |
|
|
|
funds from export revenues or financial loans received that are credited in foreign
currency overseas must be converted into local currency and credited to a local banking
account within a specific period of time. |
96
Regulations issued by the Argentine Central Bank establish specific exceptions pursuant to
which some of these requirements may not apply to foreign trade, export finance-related
transactions and certain medium term financial loans (subject to compliance with certain
requirements), nor to the primary placement of publicly traded securities listed in one or
more regulated markets.
Increasingly during 2008 and 2009, the Argentine government has imposed new restrictions on
foreign exchange outflows, including through certain transactions on securities traded
locally. Also, in October 2008, the time periods for the repatriation of export revenues
credited in foreign currency overseas were, in practice, substantially shortened.
For additional information regarding factors affecting the value of the Argentine peso, see
Item 3. Key InformationD. Risk FactorsRisks Relating to the Countries in Which We
OperateArgentina.
The market exchange rate of the Argentine peso against the U.S. dollar continues to be
determined by the forces of supply and demand in the foreign exchange market, although the
Argentine government, acting through the Argentine Central Bank, has a number of means by
which it may act to maintain exchange rate stability. See Item 3. Key InformationD. Risk
FactorsRisks Relating to our Business Changes in exchange rates or any limitation in the
Ternium companies ability to hedge against exchange rate fluctuations could adversely affect
Terniums business and results.
The following discussion of the material Luxembourg and United States federal income tax
consequences of an investment in the Companys ADSs is based upon laws and relevant
interpretations thereof in effect as of the date of this annual report, all of which are
subject to change. This discussion does not address all possible tax consequences relating to
an investment in the Companys ADSs, such as the tax consequences under United States state
and local tax laws.
Grand Duchy of Luxembourg
This section describes the material Luxembourg tax consequences of owning or disposing of
ADSs.
You should consult your own tax advisor regarding the Luxembourg tax consequences of owning
and disposing of ADSs in your particular circumstances.
As used herein, a Luxembourg individual means an individual resident in Luxembourg who is
subject to personal income tax (impôt sur le revenu) on his or her worldwide income from
Luxembourg or foreign sources, and a Luxembourg corporate holder means a company (that is, a
fully taxable collectivité within the meaning of Article 159 of the Luxembourg Income Tax Law)
resident in Luxembourg subject to corporate income tax (impôt sur le revenu des collectivités)
on its worldwide income from Luxembourg or foreign sources. For purposes of this summary,
Luxembourg individuals and Luxembourg corporate holders are collectively referred to as
Luxembourg Holders. A non-Luxembourg Holder means any investor in ADSs of the Company
other than a Luxembourg Holder.
Corporate reorganization
The Company was established as a Luxembourg société anonyme holding
under Luxembourgs 1929 holding company regime. Until termination of such regime on December
31, 2010, holding companies incorporated under the 1929 regime (including the Company) were
exempt from Luxembourg corporate income tax and Luxembourg withholding tax over dividends
distributed to shareholders.
On
January 1, 2011, the Company became an ordinary public limited
liability company (société anonyme) and,
effective as from that date, the Company is subject to all applicable Luxembourg taxes,
(including, among others, corporate income tax on its worldwide income), and its dividend
distributions will generally be subject to Luxembourg withholding tax. However, dividends
received by the Company from subsidiaries in high income tax jurisdictions, as defined under
Luxembourg law, will continue to be exempt from corporate income tax in Luxembourg under
Luxembourgs participation exemption.
97
In light of the impending termination of Luxembourgs 1929 holding company regime, in the
fourth quarter of 2010, the Company carried out a multi-step corporate reorganization, which
included, among other transactions, the contribution of all of the Companys assets and
liabilities to a wholly-owned, newly-incorporated Luxembourg subsidiary and the restructuring
of indirect holdings in certain subsidiaries. The reorganization was completed in December
2010, and resulted in a non-taxable revaluation of the accounting value (under Luxembourg
GAAP) of the Companys assets.
Following the completion of the corporate reorganization, and upon its conversion into an
ordinary Luxembourg holding company, the Company recorded a special reserve for tax purposes
in a significant amount. The Company expects that, as a result of its corporate
reorganization, its current overall tax burden will not increase, as all or substantially all
of its dividend income will come from high income tax jurisdictions. In addition, the Company
expects that dividend distributions for the foreseeable future will be imputed to the special
reserve and therefore should be exempt from Luxembourg withholding tax under current
Luxembourg law.
Tax regime applicable to realized capital gains
Luxembourg Holders
Luxembourg resident individual holders
Capital gains realized by Luxembourg resident individuals who do not hold their ADSs as part
of a commercial or industrial business and who hold no more than 10% of the share capital of
the Company will only be taxable if they are realized on a sale of ADSs that takes place
before their acquisition or within the first six months following their acquisition.
If such ADSs are held as part of a commercial or industrial business, capital gains would be
taxable in the same manner as income from such business.
Capital gains realized by Luxembourg resident individuals holding (together with his/her
spouse and underage children) directly or indirectly more than 10% of the capital of the
Company will be taxable at a special rate, regardless of the holding period.
Luxembourg resident corporate holders
Capital gains realized upon the disposal of ADSs by a fully taxable resident corporate holder
will in principle be subject to corporate income tax and municipal business tax. The combined
applicable rate (including an unemployment fund contribution) is 28.80% for the fiscal year
ending 2011 for a corporate holder established in Luxembourg-City. An exemption from such
taxes may be available to the holder pursuant to article 166 of the Luxembourg Income Tax law
subject to the fulfillment of the conditions set forth therein. The scope of the capital gains
exemption can be limited in the cases provided by the Grand Ducal Decree of December 21, 2001.
Non-Luxembourg Holders
An individual who is a non-Luxembourg Holder of ADSs (and who does not have a permanent
establishment, a permanent representative or a fixed place of business in Luxembourg) will
only be subject to Luxembourg taxation on capital gains arising upon disposal of such ADSs if
such holder has (together with his or her spouse and underage children) directly or indirectly
held more than 10% of the capital of the Company at any time during the past five years, and
either (i) such holder has been a resident of Luxembourg for tax purposes for at least 15
years and has become a non-resident within the last five years preceding the realization of
the gain, subject to any applicable tax treaty, or (ii) the disposal of ADSs occurs within six
months from their acquisition (or prior to their actual acquisition), subject to any
applicable tax treaty.
A corporate non-Luxembourg Holder (that is, a collectivité within the meaning of Article 159
of the Luxembourg Income Tax Law), which has a permanent establishment, a permanent
representative or a fixed place of business in Luxembourg to which ADSs are attributable, will
bear corporate income tax and municipal business tax on a gain realized on a disposal of such
ADSs as set forth above for a Luxembourg corporate holder. However, gains realized on the sale
of the ADSs may benefit from the full exemption provided for by Article 166 of the Luxembourg
Income Tax Law and by the Grand Ducal Decree of December 21, 2001 subject in each case to
fulfillment of the conditions set out
therein.
98
A corporate non-Luxembourg Holder, which has no permanent establishment in Luxembourg to which
the ADSs are attributable, will bear corporate income tax on a gain realized on a disposal of
such ADSs under the same conditions applicable to an individual non-Luxembourg Holder, as set
out above.
Tax regime applicable to distributions
Withholding tax
Distributions imputed for tax purposes to newly accumulated profits of the Company (on an
unconsolidated basis) are subject to a withholding tax of 15%. The rate of the withholding tax
may be reduced pursuant to double tax avoidance treaty existing between Luxembourg and the
country of residence of the relevant holder, subject to the fulfillment of the conditions set
forth therein.
No withholding tax applies if the distribution is made to (i) a Luxembourg resident corporate
holder (that is, a fully taxable collectivité within the meaning of Article 159 of the
Luxembourg Income Tax Law), (ii) an undertaking of collective character which is resident of a
Member State of the European Union and is referred to by article 2 of the Council Directive of
23rd July, 1990 concerning the common fiscal regime applicable to parent and subsidiary
companies of different member states (90/435/EEC), (iii) a corporation or a cooperative
company resident in Norway, Iceland or Liechtenstein and subject to a tax comparable to
corporate income tax as provided by the Luxembourg Income Tax Law, (iv) a company resident in
Switzerland which is subject to corporate income tax in Switzerland without benefiting from an
exemption, (i) an undertaking with a collective character subject to a tax comparable to
corporate income tax as provided by the Luxembourg Income Tax Law which is resident in a
country that has concluded a tax treaty with Luxembourg and (vi) a Luxembourg permanent
establishment of one of the above-mentioned categories, provided each time that at the date of
payment, the holder holds directly or through a tax transparent vehicle, during an
uninterrupted period of at least twelve months, ADSs representing at least 10% of the share
capital of the Company or acquired for an acquisition price of at least EUR 1,200,000.
Luxembourg Holders
With the exception of a Luxembourg corporate holders benefitting from the exemption referred
to above, Luxembourg individual holders, and Luxembourg corporate holders subject to
Luxembourg corporation taxes, must include the distributions paid on the ADSs in their taxable
income, 50% of the amount of such dividends being exempted from tax. The applicable
withholding tax can, under certain conditions, entitle the relevant Luxembourg Holder to a tax
credit.
Net wealth tax
Luxembourg Holders
Luxembourg net wealth tax will not be levied on a Luxembourg Holder with respect to the ADSs
held unless (i) the Luxembourg Holder is a legal entity subject to net wealth tax in
Luxembourg; or (ii) the ADSs are attributable to an enterprise or part thereof which is
carried on through a permanent establishment, a fixed place of business or a permanent
representative in Luxembourg.
Net wealth tax is levied annually at the rate of 0.5% on the net wealth of enterprises
resident in Luxembourg, as determined for net wealth tax purposes. The ADSs may be exempt from
net wealth tax subject to the conditions set forth by Paragraph 60 of the Law of October 16,
1934 on the valuation of assets (Bewertungsgesetz), as amended.
Non-Luxembourg Holders
Luxembourg net wealth tax will not be levied on a non-Luxembourg Holder with respect to the
ADSs held unless the ADSs are attributable to an enterprise or part thereof which is carried
on through a permanent establishment or a permanent representative in Luxembourg.
Stamp and registration taxes
No registration tax or stamp duty will be payable by a holder of ADSs in Luxembourg solely
upon the disposal of
ADSs by sale or exchange.
99
Estate and gift taxes
No estate or inheritance tax is levied on the transfer of ADSs upon the death of a holder of
ADSs in cases where the deceased was not a resident of Luxembourg for inheritance tax purposes
and no gift tax is levied upon a gift of ADSs if the gift is not passed before a Luxembourg
notary or recorded in a deed registered in Luxembourg.
Where a holder of ADSs is a resident of Luxembourg for tax purposes at the time of his death,
the ADSs are included in its taxable estate for inheritance tax or estate tax purposes.
United States federal income taxation
This section describes the material U.S. federal income tax consequences of owning ADSs. It
applies to you only if you hold your ADSs as capital assets for tax purposes. This section
does not apply to you if you are a member of a special class of holders subject to special
rules, including:
|
|
|
a dealer in securities, |
|
|
|
a trader in securities that elects to use a mark-to-market method of accounting for
securities holdings, |
|
|
|
a tax-exempt organization, |
|
|
|
a person who invests through a pass-through entity, including a partnership, |
|
|
|
a life insurance company, |
|
|
|
a person liable for alternative minimum tax, |
|
|
|
a former citizen of long-term resident of the United States, |
|
|
|
a person that actually or constructively owns 10% or more of our voting stock (including
ADSs), |
|
|
|
a person that holds ADSs as part of a straddle or a hedging or conversion transaction, or |
|
|
|
a U.S. holder (as defined below) whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar. |
This section is based on the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, its legislative
history, existing and proposed regulations, published rulings and court decisions all as
currently in effect. These laws are subject to change, possibly on a retroactive basis. In
addition, this section is based in part upon the representations of the Depositary and the
assumption that each obligation in the deposit agreement and any related agreement will be
performed in accordance with its terms.
If a partnership holds the ADSs, the U.S. federal income tax treatment of a partner will
generally depend upon the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. Each
such partner holding the ADSs is urged to consult his, her or its own tax advisor.
You are a U.S. holder if you are a beneficial owner of ADSs and you are, for U.S. federal
income tax purposes:
|
|
|
an individual citizen or resident of the United States, |
|
|
|
a domestic corporation, |
|
|
|
an estate whose income is subject to U.S. federal income tax regardless of its source, or |
|
|
|
a trust if (i) a U.S. court can exercise primary supervision over the trusts administration
and one or more U.S. persons are authorized to control all substantial decisions of the trust
or (ii) the trust has a valid electionin effect under applicable U.S. Treasury regulations to
be treated as a U.S. person. |
100
You should consult your own tax advisor regarding the U.S. federal, state and local and other
tax consequences of owning and disposing of ADSs in your particular circumstances.
This discussion addresses only U.S. federal income taxation.
In general, and taking into account the earlier assumptions, for U.S. federal income tax
purposes, if you hold ADRs evidencing ADSs, you will be treated as the owner of the Shares
represented by those ADRs. Exchanges of Shares for ADRs, and ADRs for Shares, generally will
not be subject to U.S. federal income tax.
Taxation of dividends
U.S. Holders. Under the U.S. federal income tax laws, and subject to the passive foreign
investment company, or PFIC, rules discussed below, if you are a U.S. holder, the gross amount
of any distribution we pay out of our current or accumulated earnings and profits (as
determined for U.S. federal income tax purposes) is subject to U.S. federal income taxation or
dividend income. If you are a noncorporate U.S. holder, dividends paid to you in taxable years
beginning before January 1, 2013 that constitute qualified dividend income will be taxable to
you at a maximum tax rate of 15% provided that you hold ADSs for more than 60 days during the
121-day period beginning 60 days before the ex-dividend date and meet other holding period
requirements. Dividends we pay with respect to the ADSs generally will be qualified dividend
income but there can be no assurance in this regard.
You must generally include any Luxembourg tax withheld from the dividend payment in this gross
amount even though you do not in fact receive it. The dividend is taxable to you when you
receive the dividend, actually or constructively. The dividend will not be eligible for the
dividends-received deduction generally allowed to U.S. corporations in respect of dividends
received from other U.S. corporations. Distributions in excess of current and accumulated
earnings and profits, as determined for U.S. federal income tax purposes, will be treated as a
non-taxable return of capital to the extent of your basis in the ADSs and thereafter as
capital gain. However, we do not expect to keep earnings and profits in accordance with U.S.
federal income tax principles. Therefore, you should expect that a distribution will generally
be treated as a dividend (as discussed above).
The amount of any dividend paid in foreign currency will equal the U.S. dollar value of the
foreign currency received calculated by reference to the exchange rate in effect on the date
the dividend is received by you, regardless of whether the foreign currency is converted into
U.S. dollars. If the foreign currency received as a dividend is converted into U.S. dollars on
the date of receipt, you generally will not be required to recognize foreign currency gain or
loss in respect of the dividend income. If the foreign currency received as a dividend is not
converted into U.S. dollars on the date of receipt, you will have a basis in the foreign
currency equal to its U.S. dollar value on the date of receipt. Any gain or loss realized on a
subsequent conversion or other disposition of the foreign currency will generally be treated
as ordinary income or loss from sources within the United States.
For foreign tax credit purposes, dividends will be income from sources outside the United
States and will generally constitute passive category income for purposes of computing the
foreign tax credit. In certain circumstances, if you have held ADSs for less than a specified
minimum period during which you are not protected from risk of loss, or are obligated to make
payments related to the dividends, you will not be allowed a foreign tax credit for foreign
taxes imposed on dividends that we pay.
Special rules apply in determining the foreign tax credit limitation with respect to dividends
that are subject to the maximum 15% tax rate. To the extent a refund of the tax withheld is
available to you under Luxembourg law or under any applicable treaty, the amount of tax
withheld that is refundable will not be eligible for credit against your U.S. federal income
tax liability. The rules governing the foreign tax credit are complex. You are urged to
consult your tax advisors regarding the availability of the foreign tax credit under your
particular circumstances.
Taxation of capital gains
U.S. Holders Subject to the PFIC rules discussed below, if you are a U.S. holder and you sell
or otherwise dispose of your ADSs, you will recognize capital gain or loss for U.S. federal
income tax purposes equal to the difference between the U.S. dollar value of the amount that
you realize and your tax basis, determined in U.S. dollars, in your ADSs. Capital gain of a
noncorporate U.S. holder is generally taxed at preferential rates where the property is held
for more than one year. The gain or loss will generally be income or loss from sources within
the United States for foreign tax credit limitation purposes.
101
Additional U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations
PFIC rules. Based on the Companys expected income and assets, the ADSs should not be treated
as stock of a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes, but this conclusion is a factual
determination that is made annually and thus may be subject to change. If we were to be
treated as a PFIC, unless a U.S. holder is permitted to elect and does elect to be taxed
annually on a mark-to-market basis with respect to the ADSs, gain realized on the sale or
other disposition of your ADSs would in general not be treated as capital gain. Instead, if
you are a U.S. holder, you would be treated as if you had realized such gain and certain
excess distributions ratably over your holding period for the ADSs and would be taxed at the
highest tax rate in effect for each such year to which the gain was allocated, together with
an interest charge in respect of the tax attributable to each such year. With certain
exceptions, your ADSs will be treated as stock in a PFIC if we were a PFIC at any time during
your holding period in your ADSs. Dividends that you receive from us and that are not treated
as excess distributions will not be eligible for the special tax rates applicable to qualified
dividend income if we are treated as a PFIC with respect to you either in the taxable year of
the distribution or the preceding taxable year, but instead will be taxable at rates
applicable to ordinary income.
|
F. |
|
Dividends and Paying Agents |
|
|
|
|
Not applicable. |
|
|
G. |
|
Statement by Experts |
|
|
|
|
Not applicable. |
|
|
H. |
|
Documents on Display |
We are required to file annual and special reports and other information with the SEC. You
may read and copy any documents filed by the Company at the SECs public reference room at
100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330
for further information on the public reference room. The SEC also maintains a website at
http://www.sec.gov which contains reports and other information regarding registrants that
file electronically with the SEC.
We are subject to the reporting requirements of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended as applied to foreign private issuers (the Exchange Act). Because we are a foreign
private issuer, the SECs rules do not require us to deliver proxy statements or to file
quarterly reports. In addition, our insiders are not subject to the SECs rules that
prohibit short-swing trading. We prepare quarterly and annual reports containing consolidated
financial statements in accordance with IFRS. Our annual consolidated financial statements
are certified by an independent accounting firm. We submit quarterly financial information to
the SEC on Form 6-K simultaneously with or promptly following the publication of that
information in Luxembourg or any other jurisdiction in which the Companys securities are
listed, and will file annual reports on Form 20-F within the time period required by the SEC,
which is currently six months from the close of the fiscal year on December 31, and will be
shortened to four months for annual reports on financial statements ending on or after 2011.
These quarterly and annual reports may be reviewed at the SECs Public Reference Room.
Reports and other information filed electronically with the SEC are also available at the
SECs website.
As a foreign private issuer under the Securities Act, we are not subject to the proxy rules
of Section 14 of the Exchange Act or the insider short-swing profit reporting requirements of
Section 16 of the Exchange Act.
We have appointed The Bank of New York Mellon to act as depositary for our ADSs. During the
time the deposit agreement remains in force, we will furnish the depositary with:
|
|
|
our annual reports; and |
|
|
|
summaries of all notices of general meetings of shareholders and other reports and
communications that are made generally available to our shareholders. |
102
The depositary will, as provided in the deposit agreement, if we so request, arrange for the
mailing of summaries in English of the reports and communications to all record holders of
our ADSs. Any record holder of ADSs may read the reports, notices, or summaries thereof, and
communications at the depositarys office located at 480 Washington Blvd., Jersey City, New
Jersey 07310.
Whenever a reference is made in this annual report to a contract or other document, please be
aware that such reference is not necessarily complete and that you should refer to the
exhibits that are a part of this annual report for a copy of the contract or other document.
You may review a copy of the annual report at the SECs public reference room in Washington,
D.C.
|
I. |
|
Subsidiary Information |
Not applicable.
|
|
|
Item 11. |
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
The multinational nature of our operations and customer base expose us to the risk of changes
in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and commodity prices. We selectively
manage these exposures through the use of derivative instruments to mitigate market risk.
Otherwise, we do not use derivative financial instruments for trading, other speculative
purposes or other exposures. In addition, in the ordinary course of business Ternium also
faces risks with respect to financial instruments that are either non-financial or
non-quantifiable. Such risks principally include country risk and credit risk and are not
presented in the following analysis. For additional information about our financial risk
management, see note 34 to our audited consolidated financial statements included in this
annual report.
The following tables provide a breakdown of Terniums debt instruments at December 31, 2010,
which included fixed and variable interest rate obligations detailed maturity date. The
following information should be read together with Note III, Financial Risk Management to
our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
In thousands of |
|
Expected maturity in the year ending December 31, |
|
U.S. Dollars |
|
2011 |
|
|
2012(3) |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
2014 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
Total |
|
Non-current Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floating Rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,289,445 |
|
|
|
12,726 |
|
|
|
24,873 |
|
|
|
24,874 |
|
|
|
74,656 |
|
|
|
1,426,574 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Rate |
|
|
14,206 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,206 |
|
Floating Rate |
|
|
498,877 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
498,877 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total (1) (2) |
|
|
513,083 |
|
|
|
1,289,445 |
|
|
|
12,726 |
|
|
|
24,873 |
|
|
|
24,874 |
|
|
|
74,656 |
|
|
|
1,939,657 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Borrowings are primarily bank borrowings with third parties. See Item 5.
Operating and Financial Review and ProspectsB. Liquidity and Capital
ResourcesPrincipal Sources of FundingFinancial Liabilities. |
|
(2) |
|
As most borrowings are subject to floating rates that approximate market rates,
with contractual repricing that occurs every one, three or six months, the fair value of
each borrowing approximates its carrying amount and is not disclosed separately. |
|
(3) |
|
In April 2011, we successfully negotiated an extension of maturities under Ternium
Mexicos 2007 syndicated loan facility. Pursuant to this agreement, USD803 million
originally maturing in July 2012 will be payed by Ternium Mexico in four equal semiannual
installments commencing on January 2013 and ending on July 2014. |
The weighted average interest rate of Terniums debt was 3.29% at December 31, 2010. This
figure, which incorporates instruments denominated mainly in U.S. dollars and also includes
the effect of derivative financial instruments, was calculated using the rates set for each
instrument in its corresponding currency and weighted using the dollar-equivalent outstanding
principal amount of said instruments at December 31, 2010.
103
Total Debt by Currency as of December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands of U.S. Dollars |
|
|
|
|
USD |
|
|
1,786,928 |
|
COP |
|
|
129,544 |
|
Other |
|
|
23,185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1,939,657 |
|
Interest Rate Exposure Risk
Interest rate movements create a degree of risk by affecting the amount of Terniums interest
payments and the value of Terniums floating-rate debt. Most of Terniums long-term borrowings
are at variable rates that are partially fixed through swaps and options. Terniums total
variable interest rate debt amounted to USD1.9 billion (99% of total borrowings) for the year
ended December 31, 2010.
Interest Rate Derivative Contracts
As of December 31, 2010, most of the Companys long-term borrowings were at floating rates.
Ternium Mexico entered into derivative instruments to manage the impact of the floating
interest rate changes on its financial debt.
On February 23, 2007, Ternium Mexico entered into four interest rate collar agreements that
fix the interest rate to be paid over an aggregate notional amount of USD250 million, in an
average range of 4.16% to 6.00%. These agreements expire in September 2011 and March 2012.
On June 18, 2008, Ternium Mexico entered into four knock-in swap agreements in an average swap
level of 5.22% and a knock-in (KI) level of 2.5%. As of December 31, 2010, the notional
amount outstanding was USD645 million. These agreements are due in July 2012. As of December
31, 2010, these contracts were accounted for under the hedge accounting method and generated a
pre-tax reserve in equity for USD32.0 million.
On August 13, 2010, Ternium Treasury Services entered into an interest rate swap agreement
that floats the interest rate to be paid over an aggregate notional amount of USD10.1 million,
to the equivalent of Fed Funds rate plus 38 bps. This agreement expires in April 2012.
As of December 31, 2010, Ternium Mexico was a party to interest rate collar and knock-in swaps
agreements as detailed in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2010 |
|
Total |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate collars Ternium Mexico |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract amount (in USD million) |
|
250 |
|
|
(9.9 |
) |
Average fixed pay range |
|
6.00%4.16% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knock-in swap agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract amount (in USD million) |
|
645 |
|
|
(44.8 |
) |
Average swap level and knock-in level |
|
5.22%2.50% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap agreement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract amount (in USD million) |
|
10 |
|
|
(0.0 |
) |
Average variable pay |
|
Fed Funds + 38 basis points |
|
|
|
|
104
Foreign Exchange Exposure Risk
A portion of Terniums business is carried out in currencies other than the U.S. dollar,
Terniums reporting currency. As a result of this foreign currency exposure, exchange rate
fluctuations impact Terniums results as reported in its income statement in the form of both
translation risk and transaction risk. Translation risk is the risk that Terniums
consolidated financial statements for a particular period or as of a certain date may be
affected by changes in the prevailing rates of the various functional currencies of the
reporting subsidiaries against the U.S. dollar. Transaction risk is the risk that the value of
transactions executed in currencies other than the subsidiarys functional currency may vary
according to currency fluctuations.
The following table shows a breakdown of Terniums assessed balance sheet exposure to currency
risk as of December 31, 2010. These balances include intercompany positions where the
intervening parties have different functional currencies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USD million |
|
Functional Currency |
|
Exposure to |
|
USD |
|
|
MXN |
|
|
ARP |
|
|
COP |
|
U.S. dollar (USD) |
|
|
(n/a |
) |
|
|
(1,922.2 |
) |
|
|
200.1 |
|
|
|
(48.1 |
) |
EU euro (EUR) |
|
|
(13.9 |
) |
|
|
(3.8 |
) |
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other currencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
We estimate that if the Mexican peso, Argentine peso and Colombian peso (COP) had devaluated
by 1% against the U.S. dollar with all other variables held constant, total pre-tax income for
the year would have been USD17.2 million lower, as a result of foreign exchange gains/losses
on translation of U.S. dollar-denominated financial position, mainly trade receivables,
borrowings and trade payables. This effect would have been offset by the change in the
currency translation adjustment recorded in equity.
Considering the same variation of the currencies against the U.S. dollar of all net
investments in foreign operations amounting to USD3.9 billion, the currency translation
adjustment included in total equity would have been USD38.8 million lower, arising from the
adjustment on translation of the equity related to the Mexican peso, the Argentine peso and
the Colombian peso.
Foreign Exchange Derivative Contracts
Ternium aims to manage the negative impact of fluctuations in the value of other currencies
with respect to the U.S. dollar. However, the fact that some subsidiaries have measurement
currencies other than the U.S. dollar may, at times, distort the result of these efforts as
reported under IFRS.
Ternium operates and sells its products in different countries, and as a result is exposed to
foreign exchange rate volatility. Terniums subsidiaries may use derivative contracts in order
to hedge their exposure to exchange rate risk derived from their trade and financial
operations.
During 2010, Siderar entered into several forward agreements to manage the exchange rate
exposure generated by its sales in Euros. The notional amount covered as of December 31, 2010
was EUR3.3 million with an average forward price of 1.39 U.S. dollars per Euro.
Beginning in August 2010, our wholly-owned subsidiary Ternium Treasury Services entered into a
cross-currency swap agreement over an aggregate notional amount of 5.0 million Euros, at an
exchange rate of 1.32 U.S. dollars per Euro, to manage its exposure to investments in Euros.
This agreement is due on November 18, 2011.
Furthermore, during 2010, Ternium International Costa Rica and Ternium Guatemala, subsidiaries
of Ternium Mexico, have been hedging their exposure denominated in their local currencies
through non-deliverable forward
agreements. As of December 31, 2010, the agreements aggregate notional amount were Costa Rican
colon (CRC) 4.1 billion at an exchange rate of 514
CRC per USD and GTQ249 million
at an exchange rate of 8.12 GTQ per USD.
105
The net fair values of the exchange rate derivative contracts as of December 31, 2010 were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USD Thousands |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currencies |
|
Contract |
|
Notional amount |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
USD/EUR |
|
Forward |
|
EUR |
3,300 |
|
|
|
212 |
|
USD/EUR |
|
Cross currency swap |
|
EUR |
5,000 |
|
|
|
(52 |
) |
CRC/USD |
|
ND forward |
|
CRC |
4,113,280 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
GTQ/USD |
|
ND forward |
|
GTQ |
48,711 |
|
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111 |
|
Commodities Exposure Risk
Terniums subsidiaries use certain commodities and raw materials that are subject to price
volatility caused by supply and weather conditions, political situations, financial variables
and other unpredictable factors. As a result, they are exposed to volatility in the price of
these commodities and raw materials. Terniums policy is to manage this risk by partially
fixing the underlying price or limiting its volatility for a defined period.
Natural Gas
As discussed in Item 4. Information on the CompanyB. Business OverviewRaw Materials,
Energy and Other Inputs, Siderar covers its needs for the supply of natural gas at spot local
market conditions. On the other hand, Ternium Mexico purchases all of its natural gas from
Pemex Gas and three distributors. Natural gas prices for Ternium Mexico are determined based
on the average of the quoted prices of several indexes plus transportation and service costs
depending on the areas or cities or pursuant to the methodology approved by the Energy
Regulatory Commission for prices applicable to an area as the case may be. Those prices are
related to market prices of natural gas in US and are, therefore, subject to price volatility
caused by natural gas demand conditions in US, including US weather conditions, natural gas
supply conditions in US and other factors that are outside Ternium Mexicos control and which
are generally unpredictable. Ternium Mexico constantly monitors the natural gas markets to
manage this exposure.
Commodities Derivative Contracts
Until August 2009, Ternium Mexico has entered into derivative structures to manage the impact
of the fluctuation of natural gas price over its cost. Since August 2009, Ternium Mexico has
not covered its natural gas price exposure with derivative structures, although has continued
monitoring the natural gas market.
Other Commodities and raw materials
In the past, management has used commodity derivative instruments to cover fluctuations in the
market prices of certain raw materials used in the production processes, such as zinc,
aluminum and tin. While these markets are monitored periodically, during 2008, 2009 and 2010
Ternium has not hedged any commodity positions other that those of natural gas.
|
|
|
Item 12. |
|
Description of Securities Other Than Equity Securities |
|
A. |
|
Debt Securities |
|
|
|
|
Not applicable. |
|
|
B. |
|
Warrants and Rights |
|
|
|
|
Not applicable. |
|
|
C. |
|
Other Securities |
|
|
|
|
Not applicable. |
106
|
D. |
|
American Depositary Shares |
According to our deposit agreement, holders of ADSs may have to pay to the Depositary, either
directly or indirectly, fees or charges up to the amounts set forth below:
|
|
|
A fee of USD5.00 (or less) per 100 ADSs (or portion of 100 ADSs) for: issuance of
ADSs, including issuances resulting from a distribution of shares or rights or other
property; and cancellation of ADSs for the purpose of withdrawal, including if the
deposit agreement terminates. |
|
|
|
A fee of USD0.02 (or less) per ADSs for any cash distribution to ADS registered
holders. |
|
|
|
As necessary, charges for: taxes and other governmental charges the Depositary or
the custodian have to pay on any ADS or share underlying an ADS (e.g., share transfer
taxes, stamp duty or withholding taxes); and any charges incurred by the depositary or
its agents for servicing the deposited securities. |
|
|
|
Registration or transfer fees for transfer and registration of shares on our share
register to or from the name of the Depositary or its agent when you deposit or withdraw
shares. |
|
|
|
Expenses of the Depositary for: cable, telex and facsimile transmissions; and
conversion of foreign currency. |
|
|
|
A fee equivalent to the fee that would be payable if securities distributed to ADS
holders had been shares and the shares had been deposited for issuance of ADSs for
distribution of securities distributed to holders of deposited securities which are
distributed by the Depositary to ADS registered holders. |
|
|
|
As necessary, charges for any costs incurred by the Depositary or its agents for
servicing the deposited securities. |
The Depositary collects its fees for delivery and surrender of ADSs directly from investors
depositing shares or surrendering ADSs for the purpose of withdrawal or from intermediaries
acting for them. The Depositary collects fees for making distributions to investors by
deducting those fees from the amounts distributed or by selling a portion of distributable
property to pay the fees. The Depositary may collect its annual fee for Depositary services by
deductions from cash distributions or by directly billing investors or by charging the
book-entry system accounts of participants acting for them. The Depositary may generally
refuse to provide fee-attracting services until its fees for those services are paid.
Fees payable by the Depositary to the Company
Fees incurred in 2010. In 2010, Ternium received no fees or other direct and indirect payment
from the depositary in conection with the deposited securities.
Fees to be paid in the future. Upon any listing of the Companys shares in a non-U.S. stock
exchange allowing for cross border activity, the Depositary has agreed to reimburse the
Company for expenses incurred related to the administration and maintenance of the ADS
program, including investor relations expenses, annual NYSE listing fees and other program
related expenses. There are limits on the amount of expenses for which the Depositary will
reimburse the Company. The Depositary has also agreed to pay the standard out-of-pocket
maintenance costs for the ADSs. The Company does not expect to receive any reimbursement from
the Depositary in the near future.
PART II
|
|
|
Item 13. |
|
Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies |
None.
|
|
|
Item 14. |
|
Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds |
None.
107
|
|
|
Item 15. |
|
Controls and Procedures |
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we have evaluated the effectiveness of the
design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-5(e) under the Exchange Act as of December 31, 2010. Based on that
evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of
December 31, 2010, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that
information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange
Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the
SECs rules and forms and to ensure that such information is accumulated and communicated to
management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosure. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed
to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives. Our Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are
effective at a reasonable assurance level.
Managements report on internal control over financial reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over
financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Terniums internal control over financial reporting was
designed by management to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation and fair presentation of its financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent
or detect misstatements or omissions. In addition, projections of any evaluation of
effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate
because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or
procedures may deteriorate.
Management conducted its assessment of the effectiveness of Terniums internal control over
financial reporting based on the framework in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by
the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
Based on this assessment, management has concluded that Terniums internal control over
financial reporting, as of December 31, 2010, is effective to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
for external purposes.
As allowed under certain SEC guidance, managements assessment of internal control over
financial reporting excludes the operations of Ferrasa, Ferrasa Panamá and its subsidiaries,
which were acquired in August 2010. These operations constituted, prior to giving effect to
the elimination in consolidation of intercompany transactions and balances and non-controlling
interest, USD355 million of total assets and USD128 million of total revenues for the year
ended December 31, 2010.
The effectiveness of Terniums internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,
2010 has been audited by Price Waterhouse & Co S.R.L., an independent registered public
accounting firm, as stated in their report included herein. See Report of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm.
Attestation Report of Registered Public Accounting Firm
See
page F-1 of the audited consolidated financial statements.
Change in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
During the period covered by this report, there were no changes in our internal control over
financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the
Exchange Act) that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect,
our internal control over financial reporting. No changes in our internal control over
financial reporting are anticipated to be made as a result of the acquisition of Ferrasa and
Ferrasa Panamá.
|
|
|
Item 16A. |
|
Audit Committee Financial Expert |
On June 1, 2011, our board of directors has determined that none of the independent members of
the audit committee, meets the attributes defined in Item 16A of Form 20-F for audit
committee financial experts. We do not have an
audit committee financial expert because we have concluded that the membership of the audit
committee as a whole has sufficient recent and relevant financial experience to properly
discharge its functions. In addition, the audit committee, from time to time as it deems
necessary, engages persons that meet all of the attributes of an audit committee financial
expert as consultants.
108
We have adopted a code of ethics that applies specifically to our principal executive
officers, and principal financial and accounting officer and controller, as well as persons
performing similar functions. We have also adopted a code of conduct that applies to all
company employees, including contractors, subcontractors and suppliers.
The text of our code of ethics for senior financial officers and code of conduct for employees
is posted on our web site at: www.ternium.com/en/Investor/corporategovernance.asp.
|
|
|
Item 16C. |
|
Principal Accountant Fees and Services |
Fees Paid to the Companys Principal Accountant
In 2010, Price Waterhouse & Co. S.R.L., Argentina, an independent registered public accounting
firm (PwC Argentina) served as the principal external auditor for the Company. Fees paid to
PwC Argentina and other PwC members firms in 2010 and 2009 are detailed below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31, |
|
In thousands of U.S. dollars |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audit Fees |
|
|
2,457 |
|
|
|
2,422 |
|
Audit-Related Fees |
|
|
449 |
|
|
|
213 |
|
Tax Fees |
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
|
|
All Other Fees |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
3,144 |
|
|
|
2,801 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audit Fees
Audit fees were paid for professional services rendered by the auditors for the audit of the
consolidated financial statements of the Company and the statutory financial statements of the
Company and its subsidiaries.
Audit-Related Fees
Audit-related fees are typically services that are reasonably related to the performance of
the audit or review of the consolidated financial statements and are not reported under the
audit fee item above. This item includes fees for attestation services on financial
information of the Company and its subsidiaries included in their annual reports that are
filed with their respective regulators.
Tax Fees
Tax fees were paid for tax compliance and tax advice professional services.
All Other Fees
Fees disclosed in the table above under All Other Fees consisted primarily of fees paid for
consulting services provided in connection with processing documentation. It also included
fees paid for services provided to Siderar related to fiscal information that is filed with
the tax regulators.
Audit Committees Pre-approval Policies and Procedures
The Companys audit committee is responsible for, among other things, the oversight of the
Companys independent auditors. The audit committee has adopted a policy of pre-approval of
audit and permissible non-audit services provided by its independent auditors in its charter.
109
Under the policy, the audit committee makes its recommendations through the board of Directors
to the shareholders meeting concerning the continuing appointment or termination of the
Companys independent auditors. On a yearly basis, the audit committee reviews together with
management and the independent auditor, the audit plan, audit related services and other
non-audit services and approves the related fees. Any changes to the approved fees must be
reviewed and approved by the audit committee. In addition, the audit committee delegated to
its Chairman the authority to consider and approve, on behalf of the Audit Committee,
additional non-audit services that were not recognized at the time of engagement, which must
be reported to the other members of the audit committee at its next meeting. No services
outside the scope of the audit committees approval can be undertaken by the independent
auditor.
During 2010, the audit committee did not approve any fees pursuant to the de minimis exception
to the pre-approval requirement provided by paragraph (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation
S-X.
|
|
|
Item 16D. |
|
Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees |
Not applicable.
|
|
|
Item 16E. |
|
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers |
In 2010, to our knowledge, there were no purchases of any class of registered equity
securities of the Company by the Company or any affiliated purchaser (as such term is
defined in Rule 10b-18(a)(3) under the Exchange Act).
On June 2, 2010, the Companys annual general shareholders meeting resolved to cancel the
authorization granted to the Company and to the Companys subsidiaries to acquire, from time
to time, shares, including shares represented by ADRs, granted by the general meeting of
shareholders held on June 3, 2009, and to grant a new authorization to the Company and to the
Companys subsidiaries to purchase, acquire or receive, from time to time shares of the
Company, including shares represented by ADRs, on the following terms and conditions:
|
|
|
The acquisitions of shares may be made in one or more transactions as the Board of Directors
of the Company or the board of directors or other governing body of the relevant entity, as
applicable, considers advisable. The number of shares acquired as a block may amount to the
maximum permitted amount of purchases; |
|
|
|
The maximum number of shares, including shares represented by ADRs, acquired
pursuant to this authorization may not exceed 10% of the Companys issued and outstanding
shares or, in the case of acquisitions made through a stock exchange in which the shares
or ADRs are traded, such lower amount as may not be exceeded pursuant to any applicable
laws or regulations of such market; |
|
|
|
The purchase price per ADR to be paid in cash may not exceed 125% (excluding
transaction costs and expenses), nor may it be lower than 75% (excluding transaction
costs and expenses), in each case of the average of the closing prices of the ADRs in the
New York Stock Exchange during the five trading days in which transactions in the ADRs
were recorded in the New York Stock Exchange preceding (but excluding) the day on which
the ADRs are purchased. In the case of purchases of shares other than in the form of
ADRs, the maximum and minimum per share purchase prices shall be equal to the prices that
would have applied in case of an ADR purchase pursuant to the formula above divided by
the number of underlying shares represented by an ADR at the time of the relevant
purchase. Such maximum and minimum purchase prices shall also apply to over-the-counter
or off-market transactions. Compliance with maximum and minimum purchase price
requirements in any and all acquisitions made pursuant to this authorization (including,
without limitation, acquisitions carried out through the use of derivative financial
instruments or option strategies) shall be determined on and as of the date on which the
relevant transaction is entered into, irrespective of the date on which the transaction
is to be settled; |
|
|
|
The above maximum and minimum purchase prices shall, in the event of a change in
the par value of the shares, a capital increase by means of a capitalization of reserves,
a distribution of shares under compensation or similar programs, a stock split or reverse
stock split, a distribution of reserves or any other assets, the redemption of capital,
or any other transaction impacting on the Companys equity be adapted automatically, so that
the impact of any such transaction on the value of the shares shall be reflected; |
|
|
|
The acquisitions of shares may not have the effect of reducing the Companys net
assets below the sum of the Companys share capital plus its undistributable reserves; |
110
|
|
|
Only fully paid-up shares may be acquired pursuant to this authorization; |
|
|
|
The acquisitions of shares may be carried out for any purpose, as may be permitted
under applicable laws and regulations, including, without limitation, to reduce the share
capital of the Company, to offer such shares to third parties in the context of corporate
mergers or acquisitions of other entities or participating interests therein, for
distribution to the Companys or the Companys subsidiaries directors, officers or
employees or to meet obligations arising from convertible debt instruments; |
|
|
|
The acquisitions of shares may be carried out by any and all means, as may be
permitted under applicable laws and regulations, including through any stock exchange in
which the shares or other securities representing shares are traded, through public
offers to all shareholders of the Company to buy shares, through the use of derivative
financial instruments or option strategies, or in over the counter or off-market
transactions or in any other manner; |
|
|
|
The acquisitions of shares may be carried out at any time and from time to time
during the duration of the authorization, including during a tender offer period, as may
be permitted under applicable laws and regulations; |
|
|
|
The authorization granted to acquire shares shall be valid for such maximum period
as may be provided for under applicable Luxembourg law as in effect from time to time
(such maximum period being, as of to date, five years); |
|
|
|
The acquisitions of shares shall be made at such times and on such other terms and
conditions as may be determined by the Board of Directors of the Company or the board of
directors or other governing body of the relevant Company subsidiary, provided that any
such purchase shall comply with Article 49-2 et.seq. of the Luxembourg law of August 10,
1915 on commercial companies, as amended (or any successor law) and, in the case of
acquisitions of shares made through a stock exchange in which the shares or other
securities representing shares are traded, with any applicable laws and regulations of
such market. |
On January 31, 2011, Ternium entered into a transaction and registration rights agreement with
its former shareholder Usiminas and Techint. The transaction and registration rights agreement
provided, among other things, for a SEC-registered underwritten public offering of up to all
of Ternium shares held by Usiminas (less the number of shares that Ternium and Techint agreed
to purchase as discussed below) in the form of ADSs listed on the New York Stock Exchange.
Neither Ternium nor Techint offered to sell any Ternium shares or ADSs in the public offering.
On February 9, 2011, Ternium and Techint, following the pricing of the underwritten public
offering mentioned above, entered into purchase agreements with Usiminas relating to their
concurrent purchase transactions of Ternium shares. Under these agreements, on February 15,
2011, Ternium and Techint purchased from Usiminas 41,666,666 and 27,777,780 Ternium shares for
a total consideration of USD150 million and USD100 million, respectively. In connection with
the sale of Terniums shares by Usiminas, Ternium collected a USD10.2 million fee and was
reimbursed of all expenses relating to the offering and concurrent purchase.
In the future, we may, on the terms and subject to the conditions above referred, initiate a
share capital repurchase or similar program or engage in other transactions pursuant to which
we would repurchase, directly or indirectly, the Companys ordinary shares, ADSs or both. In
addition, we or our subsidiaries may enter into transactions involving sales or purchases of
derivatives or other instruments (either settled in cash or through physical delivery of
securities) with returns linked to the Companys ordinary shares, ADSs or both. The timing and
amount of repurchase transactions under any such program, or sales or purchases of derivatives
or other instruments, would depend on market conditions as well as other corporate and
regulatory considerations.
|
|
|
Item 16F. |
|
Change in Registrants Certifying Accountant |
Our independent auditors for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 were
PricewaterhouseCoopers (acting, in connection with our annual accounts and annual consolidated
financial statements required under Luxembourg law, through PricewaterhouseCoopers S.àr.l.,
Réviseur d entreprises agréé, and in connection with our annual and interim consolidated
financial statements required under the laws of any other relevant jurisdiction, through Price
Waterhouse & Co. S.R.L.). Our independent auditors are appointed annually for one-year terms.
Following our recent corporate reorganization (see Item 10. Additional InformationE.
TaxationGrand Duchy of LuxembourgCorporate
Reorganization), our audit committee
recommended, and the annual shareholders meeting approved at a
meeting held on June 1, 2011, that PricewaterhouseCoopers
S.àr.l., Réviseur dentreprises agréé, be appointed as independent auditors for the year
ending December 31, 2011, in connection with all of our annual accounts and financial
statements.
111
|
|
|
Item 16G. |
|
Corporate Governance |
Our corporate governance practices are governed by Luxembourg law (particularly the law of
August 10th, 1915 on commercial companies) and our articles of association. As a Luxembourg
company listed on the New York Stock Exchange (the NYSE), we are not required to comply with
all of the corporate governance listing standards of the NYSE. We, however, believe that our
corporate governance practices meet or exceed, in all material respects, the corporate
governance standards that are generally required for controlled companies by the NYSE but the
following is a summary of the significant ways that our corporate governance practices differ
from the corporate governance standards required for controlled companies by the NYSE
(provided that our corporate governance practices may differ in non-material ways from the
standards required by the NYSE that are not detailed here):
Non-management Directors Meetings
Under NYSE standards, non-management directors must meet at regularly scheduled executive
sessions without management present and, if such group includes directors who are not
independent, a meeting should be scheduled once per year including only independent directors.
Neither Luxembourg law nor our articles of association require the holding of such meetings
and we do not have a set policy for these meetings. Our articles of association provide,
however, that the board shall meet as often as required by the interests of the Company and at
least four times a year, upon notice by the chairperson or by any two directors.
In addition, NYSE-listed companies are required to provide a method for interested parties to
communicate directly with the non-management directors as a group. While we do not have such a
method, we have set up a compliance line for investors and other interested parties to
communicate their concerns to members of our audit committee (which, as already stated, are
independent).
Audit Committee
Under NYSE standards, listed U.S. companies are required to have an audit committee composed
of independent directors that satisfies the requirements of Rule 10A-3 promulgated under the
Exchange Act. Our articles of association currently require us to have an audit committee
composed of three members, of which at least two must be independent (as defined in our
articles of association) and our audit committee complies with such requirements. In
accordance with NYSE standards, we have an audit committee entirely composed of independent
directors.
Under NYSE standards, all audit committee members of listed U.S. companies are required to be
financially literate or must acquire such financial knowledge within a reasonable period and
at least one of its members shall have experience in accounting or financial administration.
In addition, if a member of the audit committee is simultaneously a member of the audit
committee of more than three public companies, and the listed company does not limit the
number of audit committees on which its members may serve, then in each case the board must
determine whether the simultaneous service would prevent such member from effectively serving
on the listed companys audit committee and shall publicly disclose its decision. No
comparable provisions on audit committee membership exist under Luxembourg law or our articles
of association.
Standards for Evaluating Director Independence
Under NYSE standards, the board is required, on a case by case basis, to express an opinion
with regard to the independence or lack of independence of each individual director. Neither
Luxembourg law nor our articles of association require the board to express such an opinion.
In addition, the definition of independent under the rules of the NYSE differs in some
non-material respects from the definition contained in our articles of association.
112
Audit Committee Responsibilities
Pursuant to our articles of association, the audit committee shall assist the board of
directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities relating to the integrity of the
Companys financial statements, including periodically reporting to the Board of Directors on
its activity and the adequacy of the Companys system of internal controls over financial
reporting. As per the audit committee charter, as amended, the audit committee shall make
recommendations for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of, and consider
the independence of, the Companys external auditors. The audit committee is required to
review material transactions (as defined by the articles of association) between us or our
subsidiaries with related parties and also perform the other duties entrusted to it by the
board.
The NYSE requires certain matters to be set forth in the audit committee charter of U.S.
listed companies. Our audit committee charter provides for many of the responsibilities that
are expected from such bodies under the NYSE standard; however, due to our equity structure
and holding company nature, the charter does not contain all such responsibilities, including
provisions related to setting hiring policies for employees or former employees of independent
auditors, discussion of risk assessment and risk management policies, and an annual
performance evaluation of the audit committee.
Shareholder Voting on Equity Compensation Plans
Under NYSE standards, shareholders must be given the opportunity to vote on
equity-compensation plans and material revisions thereto, except for employment inducement
awards, certain grants, plans and amendments in the context of mergers and acquisitions, and
certain specific types of plans. We do not currently offer equity-based compensation to our
directors, executive officers or employees, and therefore do not have a policy on this matter.
Disclosure of Corporate Governance Guidelines
NYSE-listed companies must adopt and disclose corporate governance guidelines. Neither
Luxembourg law nor our articles of association require the adoption or disclosure of corporate
governance guidelines. Our board of directors follows corporate governance guidelines
consistent with our equity structure and holding company nature, but we have not codified them
and therefore do not disclose them on our website.
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
Under NYSE standards, listed companies must adopt and disclose a code of business conduct and
ethics for directors, officers and employees, and promptly disclose any waivers of the code
for directors or executive officers. Neither Luxembourg law nor our articles of association
require the adoption or disclosure of such a code of conduct. We have adopted a code of
conduct that applies to all directors, officers and employees, which is posted on our website
and complies with the NYSEs requirements, except that does not require the disclosure of
waivers of the code for directors and officers. In addition, we have adopted a supplementary
code of ethics for senior financial officers which is also posted on our website.
Chief Executive Officer Certification
A chief executive officer of a U.S. company listed on NYSE must annually certify that he or
she is not aware of any violation by the company of NYSE corporate governance standards. In
accordance with NYSE rules applicable to foreign private issuers, our chief executive officer
is not required to provide NYSE with this annual compliance certification. However, in
accordance with NYSE rules applicable to all listed companies, our chief executive officer
must promptly notify NYSE in writing after any of our executive officers becomes aware of any
noncompliance with any applicable provision of NYSEs corporate governance standards. In
addition, we must submit an executed written affirmation annually and an interim written
affirmation each time a change occurs to the board or the audit committee.
PART III
|
|
|
Item 17. |
|
Financial Statements |
We have responded to Item 18 in lieu of responding to this Item.
|
|
|
Item 18. |
|
Financial Statements |
See
pages F-1 through F-56 of this annual report.
113
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
1.1 |
|
|
Updated and Consolidated Articles of Association of Ternium S.A., dated as of June 1, 2011 |
|
2.1 |
|
|
Deposit Agreement entered into between Ternium S.A. and The Bank of New York* |
|
4.1 |
|
|
Shareholders Agreement, dated January 9, 2006, between Tenaris S.A. and Inversora Siderurgica Limited** |
|
4.2 |
|
|
Promissory Notes (pagarés) numbered 1 to 7 issued by CVG on May 7, 2009*** |
|
8.1 |
|
|
List of subsidiaries of Ternium S.A. |
|
12.1 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
12.2 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
13.1 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
13.2 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
15.1 |
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
|
15.2 |
|
|
Item
16-F letter issued by Price Waterhouse & Co. S.R.L. |
|
|
|
* |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement on Form F-6, filed by Ternium S.A. on
January 11, 2006 (File No. 333-130952). |
|
** |
|
Incorporated by reference to the F-1 Registration Statement filed by Ternium S.A. on January
27, 2006 (File No. 333-130950). |
|
*** |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Annual Report on Form 20-F, filed by Ternium S.A. on June
30, 2009 (File No.001-32734 09919440). |
114
SIGNATURES
The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and
that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this annual report on its behalf.
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
TERNIUM S.A.
|
|
|
By: |
|
/s/ Pablo Brizzio
|
|
|
|
|
Name: Pablo Brizzio |
|
|
|
|
Title: Chief Financial Officer |
|
115
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
1.1 |
|
|
Updated and Consolidated Articles of Association of Ternium S.A., dated as of June 1, 2011 |
|
2.1 |
|
|
Deposit Agreement entered into between Ternium S.A. and The Bank of New York* |
|
4.1 |
|
|
Shareholders Agreement, dated January 9, 2006, between Tenaris S.A. and Inversora Siderurgica Limited** |
|
4.2 |
|
|
Promissory Notes (pagarés) numbered 1 to 7 issued by CVG on May 7, 2009*** |
|
8.1 |
|
|
List of subsidiaries of Ternium S.A. |
|
12.1 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
12.2 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
13.1 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
13.2 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
15.1 |
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
|
15.2 |
|
|
Item
16-F letter issued by Price Waterhouse & Co. S.R.L.
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement on Form F-6, filed by Ternium S.A. on
January 11, 2006 (File No. 333-130952). |
|
** |
|
Incorporated by reference to the F-1 Registration Statement filed by Ternium S.A. on January
27, 2006 (File No. 333-130950). |
|
*** |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Annual Report on Form 20-F, filed by Ternium S.A. on June
30, 2009 (File No.001-32734 09919440). |
TERNIUM S.A.
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
As of December 31, 2010 and 2009 and
for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
46a, Avenue John F. Kennedy, 2nd floor
L 1855
R.C.S. Luxembourg : B 98 668
TERNIUM S.A.
Index to financial statements
Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
|
|
|
|
F-1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-10 |
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Ternium S.A.:
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated statements of financial position and the related
consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, shareholders equity and cash flows
present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Ternium S.A. and its
subsidiaries at December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the results of their operations and their cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010 in conformity with
International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards
Board and in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the European
Union. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on criteria established in Internal
Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO). The Companys management is responsible for these financial statements, for
maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Managements Report on
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 15. Our responsibility is to
express opinions on these financial statements and on the Companys internal control over financial
reporting based on our integrated audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards
of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we
plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements
are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting
was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining,
on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements,
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over
financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial
reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also
included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A
companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i)
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company;
and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
F-1
As described in Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting appearing under
Item 15, management has excluded Ferrasa S.A.S (and its subsidiaries) and Ferrasa Panamá S.A from
its assessment of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010 because they
were acquired by the Company in a purchase business combination in August 2010. We have also
excluded Ferrasa S.A.S (and its subsidiaries) and Ferrasa Panamá S.A. from our audit of internal
control over financial reporting. The Company holds a 54% ownership interest in Ferrasa S.A.S (and
its subsidiaries) and Ferrasa Panamá S.A., their total assets and total revenues, prior to giving
effect to the elimination in consolidation of intercompany transactions, balances and
non-controlling interest, amount to USD 355 million and USD 128 million, respectively, of the
related consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended December 31, 2010.
June 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRICE WATERHOUSE & CO. S.R.L. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by
|
|
/s/ Daniel A. López Lado (Partner)
Daniel A. López Lado
|
|
|
Price Waterhouse & Co. S.R.L., Bouchard 557, piso 8°, C1106ABG Ciudad de Buenos Aires
T: +(54.11) 4850.0000, F: +(54.11) 4850.1800, www.pwc.com/ar
© 2011 In Argentina, the member firms of the global network of PricewaterhouseCoopers International
Limited are PriceWaterhouse & Co. S.R.L, PriceWaterhouse & Co. Asesores de Empresas S.R.L. and
PricewaterhouseCoopers Jurídico Fiscal S.R.L, each of which, either separately or jointly, are
identified as PwC Argentina.
F-2
TERNIUM S.A.
Consolidated financial statements
as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 and
for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
(All amounts in USD thousands)
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
Notes |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,382,004 |
|
|
|
4,958,983 |
|
|
|
8,464,885 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(5,665,254 |
) |
|
|
(4,110,370 |
) |
|
|
(6,128,027 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,716,750 |
|
|
|
848,613 |
|
|
|
2,336,858 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
(665,306 |
) |
|
|
(531,530 |
) |
|
|
(669,473 |
) |
Other operating income (expenses), net |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
2,493 |
|
|
|
(20,700 |
) |
|
|
8,662 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,053,937 |
|
|
|
296,383 |
|
|
|
1,676,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(72,969 |
) |
|
|
(105,810 |
) |
|
|
(136,111 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,347 |
|
|
|
21,141 |
|
|
|
32,178 |
|
Interest income Sidor financial asset |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
61,012 |
|
|
|
135,952 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other financial income (expenses), net |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
115,112 |
|
|
|
81,639 |
|
|
|
(693,192 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings of associated companies |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
1,688 |
|
|
|
1,110 |
|
|
|
1,851 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,186,127 |
|
|
|
430,415 |
|
|
|
880,773 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax (expense) benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current and deferred income tax expense |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(406,657 |
) |
|
|
(91,314 |
) |
|
|
(258,969 |
) |
Reversal of deferred statutory profit sharing |
|
|
4 (m) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96,265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
779,470 |
|
|
|
339,101 |
|
|
|
718,069 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
428,023 |
|
|
|
157,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit for the year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
779,470 |
|
|
|
767,124 |
|
|
|
875,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity holders of the Company |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
622,076 |
|
|
|
717,400 |
|
|
|
715,418 |
|
Non-controlling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
157,394 |
|
|
|
49,724 |
|
|
|
159,746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
779,470 |
|
|
|
767,124 |
|
|
|
875,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
2,004,743,442 |
|
|
|
2,004,743,442 |
|
|
|
2,004,743,442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted earnings per share
(expressed in USD per share) for profit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- From continuing operations attributable to
the equity holders of the Company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.31 |
|
|
|
0.15 |
|
|
|
0.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- From discontinued operations attributable to
the equity holders of the Company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.21 |
|
|
|
0.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- For the year attributable to the equity
holders of the Company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.31 |
|
|
|
0.36 |
|
|
|
0.36 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-3
TERNIUM S.A.
Consolidated financial statements
as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 and
for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
(All amounts in USD thousands)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit for the year |
|
|
779,470 |
|
|
|
767,124 |
|
|
|
875,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment |
|
|
35,915 |
|
|
|
(93,922 |
) |
|
|
(502,996 |
)(1) |
Changes in the fair value of
derivatives classified
as cash flow hedges |
|
|
14,729 |
|
|
|
35,881 |
|
|
|
(82,574 |
) |
Income tax relating to cash flow hedges |
|
|
(4,419 |
) |
|
|
(9,112 |
) |
|
|
23,121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) for the year,
net of tax |
|
|
46,225 |
|
|
|
(67,153 |
) |
|
|
(562,449 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income for the year |
|
|
825,695 |
|
|
|
699,971 |
|
|
|
312,715 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity holders of the Company |
|
|
684,635 |
|
|
|
698,789 |
|
|
|
244,927 |
|
Non-controlling interest |
|
|
141,060 |
|
|
|
1,182 |
|
|
|
67,788 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
825,695 |
|
|
|
699,971 |
|
|
|
312,715 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes an increase of USD 151.5 million corresponding to the currency translation
adjustment from discontinued operations. See note 29 (ii). |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. |
F-4
TERNIUM S.A.
Consolidated financial statements
as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 and
for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
(All amounts in USD thousands)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
4,262,896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,040,415 |
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
1,129,348 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,085,412 |
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in associated companies |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
8,212 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,577 |
|
|
|
|
|
Sidor financial asset |
|
|
29 (ii) |
|
|
|
74,549 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other investments |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
35,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,414 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
12,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables, net |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
56,471 |
|
|
|
5,579,438 |
|
|
|
101,317 |
|
|
|
5,250,135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
94,573 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,588 |
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
1,953,390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,350,568 |
|
|
|
|
|
Trade receivables, net |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
663,502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
437,835 |
|
|
|
|
|
Sidor financial asset |
|
|
29 (ii) |
|
|
|
183,439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
964,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other investments |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
848,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,844 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
1,779,416 |
|
|
|
5,522,932 |
|
|
|
2,095,798 |
|
|
|
5,033,292 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current assets classified as held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,532,893 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,042,538 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,112,331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,292,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital and reserves attributable to the
companys equity holders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,880,740 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,296,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-controlling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,135,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
964,897 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,016,101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,261,239 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
16,144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,913 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
877,742 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
857,297 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
201,312 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
176,626 |
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
18,822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,627 |
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
1,426,574 |
|
|
|
2,540,594 |
|
|
|
1,787,204 |
|
|
|
2,872,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current tax liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
294,902 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103,171 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
123,610 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
Trade payables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
588,086 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
412,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
35,955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,083 |
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
513,083 |
|
|
|
1,555,636 |
|
|
|
539,525 |
|
|
|
1,158,767 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,096,230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,031,434 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity and liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,112,331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,292,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-5
TERNIUM S.A.
Consolidated financial statements
as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 and
for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
(All amounts in USD thousands)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable to the Companys equity holders (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
public |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Currency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital |
|
|
offering |
|
|
|
|
|
|
stock issue |
|
|
translation |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
|
|
|
|
controlling |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
stock (2) |
|
|
expenses |
|
|
Reserves (3) |
|
|
discount (4) |
|
|
adjustment |
|
|
earnings |
|
|
Total |
|
|
interest |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2010 |
|
|
2,004,743 |
|
|
|
(23,295 |
) |
|
|
1,726,216 |
|
|
|
(2,324,866 |
) |
|
|
(570,844 |
) |
|
|
4,484,388 |
|
|
|
5,296,342 |
|
|
|
964,897 |
|
|
|
6,261,239 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit for the year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
622,076 |
|
|
|
622,076 |
|
|
|
157,394 |
|
|
|
779,470 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss)
for the year: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,412 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,412 |
|
|
|
(17,497 |
) |
|
|
35,915 |
|
Cash flow hedges, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,147 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,147 |
|
|
|
1,163 |
|
|
|
10,310 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income for the year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,147 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,412 |
|
|
|
622,076 |
|
|
|
684,635 |
|
|
|
141,060 |
|
|
|
825,695 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid in cash (5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100,237 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100,237 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100,237 |
) |
Dividends paid in cash by subsidiary
companies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38,304 |
) |
|
|
(38,304 |
) |
Contributions from non-controlling
shareholders in consolidated
subsidiaries (See Note 31) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,900 |
|
|
|
4,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of business (See Note 3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,808 |
|
|
|
62,808 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2010 |
|
|
2,004,743 |
|
|
|
(23,295 |
) |
|
|
1,635,126 |
|
|
|
(2,324,866 |
) |
|
|
(517,432 |
) |
|
|
5,106,464 |
|
|
|
5,880,740 |
|
|
|
1,135,361 |
|
|
|
7,016,101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Shareholders equity determined in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in Luxembourg is disclosed in Note 27 (iii). |
|
(2) |
|
The Company has an authorized share capital of a single class of 3.5 billion shares
having a nominal value of USD1.00 per share. As of December 31, 2010, there were
2,004,743,442 shares issued. All issued shares are fully paid. |
|
(3) |
|
Include legal reserve under Luxembourg law for USD 200.5 million, distributable reserves
under Luxembourg law for USD 101.4 million, undistributable reserves under Luxembourg law
for USD 1.4 billion, hedge accounting reserve, net of tax effect, for USD (22.4) million and
reserves related to the acquisition of non-controlling interest in subsidiaries according to
IAS 27 for USD (58.5) million. |
|
(4) |
|
Represents the difference between book value of non-monetary contributions received from
shareholders under Luxembourg GAAP and IFRS. |
|
(5) |
|
Represents USD 0.05 per share (USD 0.50 per ADS) |
Dividends may be paid by Ternium to the extent distributable retained earnings calculated in
accordance with Luxembourg law and regulations exist. Therefore, retained earnings included in
these consolidated financial statements may not be wholly distributable. See Note 27 (iii). The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-6
TERNIUM S.A.
Consolidated financial statements
as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 and
for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
(All amounts in USD thousands)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable to the Companys equity holders (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
public |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Currency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital |
|
|
offering |
|
|
|
|
|
|
stock issue |
|
|
translation |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
|
|
|
|
controlling |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
stock (2) |
|
|
expenses |
|
|
Reserves |
|
|
discount (3) |
|
|
adjustment |
|
|
earnings |
|
|
Total |
|
|
interest |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2009 |
|
|
2,004,743 |
|
|
|
(23,295 |
) |
|
|
1,702,285 |
|
|
|
(2,324,866 |
) |
|
|
(528,485 |
) |
|
|
3,766,988 |
|
|
|
4,597,370 |
|
|
|
964,094 |
|
|
|
5,561,464 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit for the year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
717,400 |
|
|
|
717,400 |
|
|
|
49,724 |
|
|
|
767,124 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss)
for the year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(42,359 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(42,359 |
) |
|
|
(51,563 |
) |
|
|
(93,922 |
) |
Cash flow hedges, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,748 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,748 |
|
|
|
3,021 |
|
|
|
26,769 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income (loss) for
the year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,748 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(42,359 |
) |
|
|
717,400 |
|
|
|
698,789 |
|
|
|
1,182 |
|
|
|
699,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of non-controlling
interest (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
(379 |
) |
|
|
(196 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
2,004,743 |
|
|
|
(23,295 |
) |
|
|
1,726,216 |
|
|
|
(2,324,866 |
) |
|
|
(570,844 |
) |
|
|
4,484,388 |
|
|
|
5,296,342 |
|
|
|
964,897 |
|
|
|
6,261,239 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Shareholders equity determined in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in Luxembourg is disclosed in Note 27 (iii). |
|
(2) |
|
The Company has an authorized share capital of a single class of 3.5 billion shares
having a nominal value of USD1.00 per share. As of December 31, 2009, there were
2,004,743,442 shares issued. All issued shares are fully paid. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents the difference between book value of non-monetary contributions received from
shareholders under Luxembourg GAAP and IFRS. |
|
(4) |
|
On February 5, 2009, Ternium Internacional España S.L.U. acquired from its related
company Siderca S.A.I.C., 53,452 shares of Siderar S.A.I.C., representing 0.015% of that
companys share capital, for an aggregate purchase price of USD 196 thousand. After this
acquisition, Ternium increased its ownership in Siderar to 60.94%. |
|
|
|
As permitted by IFRS 3, the Company accounted for this acquisition under the economic entity
model, which requires that the acquisition of an additional equity interest in a controlled
subsidiary be accounted for at its carrying amount, with the difference arising on purchase
price allocation being recorded directly in equity. |
Dividends may be paid by Ternium to the extent distributable retained earnings calculated in
accordance with Luxembourg law and regulations exist. Therefore, retained earnings included in
these consolidated financial statements may not be wholly distributable. See Note 27 (iii). The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
F-7
TERNIUM S.A.
Consolidated financial statements
as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 and
for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
(All amounts in USD thousands)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable to the Companys equity holders (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
public |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Currency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital |
|
|
offering |
|
|
|
|
|
|
stock issue |
|
|
translation |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
|
|
|
|
controlling |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
stock (2) |
|
|
expenses |
|
|
Reserves |
|
|
discount (3) |
|
|
adjustment |
|
|
earnings |
|
|
Total |
|
|
interest |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2008 |
|
|
2,004,743 |
|
|
|
(23,295 |
) |
|
|
1,946,963 |
|
|
|
(2,324,866 |
) |
|
|
(110,739 |
) |
|
|
2,959,874 |
|
|
|
4,452,680 |
|
|
|
1,805,243 |
|
|
|
6,257,923 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit for the year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
715,418 |
|
|
|
715,418 |
|
|
|
159,746 |
|
|
|
875,164 |
|
Other comprehensive loss for the
year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(417,746 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(417,746 |
) |
|
|
(85,250 |
) |
|
|
(502,996 |
) |
Cash flow hedges, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(52,745 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(52,745 |
) |
|
|
(6,708 |
) |
|
|
(59,453 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive (loss) income for
the year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(52,745 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(417,746 |
) |
|
|
715,418 |
|
|
|
244,927 |
|
|
|
67,788 |
|
|
|
312,715 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reversal of revaluation reserves
related to discontinued operations (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(91,696 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,696 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid in cash (5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100,237 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100,237 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100,237 |
) |
Dividends paid in cash by subsidiary
companies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,595 |
) |
|
|
(19,595 |
) |
Non-controlling interest in
discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(889,342 |
) |
|
|
(889,342 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
2,004,743 |
|
|
|
(23,295 |
) |
|
|
1,702,285 |
|
|
|
(2,324,866 |
) |
|
|
(528,485 |
) |
|
|
3,766,988 |
|
|
|
4,597,370 |
|
|
|
964,094 |
|
|
|
5,561,464 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Shareholders equity determined in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in Luxembourg is disclosed in Note 27 (iii). |
|
(2) |
|
The Company has an authorized share capital of a single class of 3.5 billion shares
having a nominal value of USD1.00 per share. As of December 31, 2008, there were
2,004,743,442 shares issued. All issued shares are fully paid. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents the difference between book value of non-monetary contributions received from
shareholders under Luxembourg GAAP and IFRS. |
|
(4) |
|
Corresponds to the reversal of the revaluation reserve recorded in fiscal year 2005,
representing the excess of fair value over the book value of Terniums pre-acquisition
interest in the net assets of Sidor. |
|
(5) |
|
Represents USD 0.05 per share (USD 0.50 per ADS) |
Dividends may be paid by Ternium to the extent distributable retained earnings calculated in
accordance with Luxembourg law and regulations exist. Therefore, retained earnings included in
these consolidated financial statements may not be wholly distributable. See Note 27 (iii). The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-8
TERNIUM S.A.
Consolidated financial statements
as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 and
for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
(All amounts in USD thousands)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
Notes |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
779,470 |
|
|
|
339,101 |
|
|
|
718,069 |
|
Adjustments for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
12&13 |
|
|
|
383,300 |
|
|
|
385,105 |
|
|
|
413,541 |
|
Income tax accruals less payments |
|
|
32 (b) |
|
|
|
226,820 |
|
|
|
(49,342 |
) |
|
|
(88,511 |
) |
Equity in earnings of associated companies |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(1,688 |
) |
|
|
(1,110 |
) |
|
|
(1,851 |
) |
Interest accruals less payments |
|
|
32 (b) |
|
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
10,706 |
|
|
|
(84,151 |
) |
Impairment charge |
|
|
27 (ii) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,022 |
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in provisions |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
5,543 |
|
|
|
4,614 |
|
|
|
2,358 |
|
Changes in working capital |
|
|
32 (b) |
|
|
|
(447,973 |
) |
|
|
635,179 |
|
|
|
(1,071,472 |
) |
Interest income Sidor financial asset |
|
|
29 (ii) |
|
|
|
(61,012 |
) |
|
|
(135,952 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net foreign exchange results and others |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(77,576 |
) |
|
|
(53,565 |
) |
|
|
629,530 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
806,825 |
|
|
|
1,161,758 |
|
|
|
517,513 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
12&13 |
|
|
|
(350,124 |
) |
|
|
(208,590 |
) |
|
|
(587,904 |
) |
Acquisition of business: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase consideration |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(75,000 |
) |
|
|
(196 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Cash acquired |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
6,593 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase) Decrease in other investments |
|
|
15&20 |
|
|
|
(820,672 |
) |
|
|
43,163 |
|
|
|
(24,674 |
) |
Proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,693 |
|
|
|
3,245 |
|
|
|
2,103 |
|
Proceeds from Sidor financial asset |
|
|
29 (ii) |
|
|
|
767,382 |
|
|
|
953,611 |
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends received from associated companies |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contributions in associated companies |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(302 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from the sale of discontinued operations |
|
|
29 (i) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
718,635 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
29 (iv) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
242,370 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(470,128 |
) |
|
|
791,233 |
|
|
|
350,530 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid in cash to companys shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100,237 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100,237 |
) |
Dividends paid in cash by subsidiary companies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38,304 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,595 |
) |
Contributions from non-controlling shareholders in
consolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,441 |
|
|
|
219,037 |
|
|
|
519,809 |
|
Repayments of borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(555,918 |
) |
|
|
(1,141,625 |
) |
|
|
(1,152,886 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(654,118 |
) |
|
|
(922,588 |
) |
|
|
(752,909 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Decrease) Increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(317,421 |
) |
|
|
1,030,403 |
|
|
|
115,134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Movement in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At January 1, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,095,798 |
|
|
|
1,065,552 |
|
|
|
1,125,830 |
|
Effect of exchange rate changes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,039 |
|
|
|
(157 |
) |
|
|
(17,518 |
) |
(Decrease) Increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(317,421 |
) |
|
|
1,030,403 |
|
|
|
115,134 |
|
Cash & cash equivalents of discontinued operations at
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(157,894 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at December 31, (1) |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
1,779,416 |
|
|
|
2,095,798 |
|
|
|
1,065,552 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In addition, the Company had restricted cash for USD 12,343. As of December 31, 2009 and
2008, there were no restricted cash. Additionally, the Company had other investments with a
maturity of more than three months for USD 848,400 at
December 31, 2010. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-9
TERNIUM S.A.
Consolidated financial statements
as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 and
for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
(All amounts in USD thousands)
INDEX TO THE NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1 |
|
General information |
|
2 |
|
Basis of presentation |
|
3 |
|
Acquisition of business |
|
4 |
|
Accounting policies |
|
5 |
|
Segment information |
|
6 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
7 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
8 |
|
Labor costs (included in cost of sales, selling, general and administrative expenses) |
|
9 |
|
Other operating income (expenses), net |
|
10 |
|
Other financial income (expenses), net |
|
11 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
12 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
13 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
14 |
|
Investments in associated companies |
|
15 |
|
Other investments, net non current |
|
16 |
|
Receivables, net non current |
|
17 |
|
Receivables current |
|
18 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
19 |
|
Trade receivables, net |
|
20 |
|
Cash, cash equivalents and other investments |
|
21 |
|
Allowances and Provisions non current |
|
22 |
|
Allowances current |
|
23 |
|
Deferred income tax |
|
24 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
25 |
|
Derivative financial instruments |
|
26 |
|
Borrowings |
|
27 |
|
Contingencies, commitments and restrictions on the distribution of profits |
|
28 |
|
Earnings per share |
|
29 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
30 |
|
Related party transactions |
|
31 |
|
Joint Venture in Mexico |
|
32 |
|
Other required disclosures |
|
33 |
|
Recently issued accounting pronouncements |
|
34 |
|
Financial risk management |
|
35 |
|
Auditors fees |
|
36 |
|
Subsequent events Repurchase of Shares from Usiminas concurrently with secondary public offering |
|
37 |
|
Update as of June 30, 2011 |
F-10
TERNIUM S.A.
Consolidated financial statements
as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 and
for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
(All amounts in USD thousands)
1 General information
Ternium S.A. (the Company or Ternium), was incorporated on December 22, 2003 to hold
investments in flat and long steel manufacturing and distributing companies. The Company has an
authorized share capital of a single class of 3.5 billion shares having a nominal value of USD1.00
per share. As of December 31, 2010, there were 2,004,743,442 shares issued. All issued shares are
fully paid.
Following a corporate reorganization carried out during fiscal year 2005, in January 2006 the
Company successfully completed its registration process with the United States Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC). Terniums ADSs began trading on the New York Stock Exchange under the
symbol TX on February 1, 2006. The Companys initial public offering was settled on February 6,
2006. On January 31, 2011, the Company filed with the SEC a registration statement on form F-3
relating to sales of equity and debt securities.
The Company was initially established as a public limited liability company (société anonyme) under
Luxembourgs 1929 holding company regime. Until termination of such regime on December 31, 2010,
holding companies incorporated under the 1929 regime (including the Company) were exempt from
Luxembourg corporate and withholding tax over dividends distributed to shareholders.
On January 1, 2011, the Company became an ordinary public limited liability company (société
anonyme) and, effective as from that date, the Company is subject to all applicable Luxembourg
taxes (including, among others, corporate income tax on its worldwide income) and its dividend
distributions will generally be subject to Luxembourg withholding tax. However, dividends received
by the Company from subsidiaries in high income tax jurisdictions, as defined under Luxembourg law,
will continue to be exempt from corporate income tax in Luxembourg under Luxembourgs participation
exemption.
In light of the impending termination of Luxembourgs 1929 holding company regime, in the fourth
quarter of 2010, the Company carried out a multi-step corporate reorganization, which included,
among other transactions, the contribution of all of the Companys assets and liabilities to a
wholly-owned, newly-incorporated Luxembourg subsidiary and the restructuring of indirect holdings
in certain subsidiaries. The reorganization was completed in December 2010, and resulted in a
non-taxable revaluation of the accounting value (under Luxembourg GAAP) of the Companys assets.
Following the completion of the corporate reorganization, and upon its conversion into an ordinary
Luxembourg holding company, the Company recorded a special reserve for tax purposes in a
significant amount. The Company expects that, as a result of its corporate reorganization, its
current overall tax burden will not increase, as all or substantially all of its dividend income
will come from high income tax jurisdictions. In addition, the Company expects that dividend
distributions for the foreseeable future will be imputed to the special reserve and therefore
should be exempt from Luxembourg withholding tax under current Luxembourg law.
2 Basis of presentation
These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with IFRS
(International Financial Reporting Standards) issued and effective or issued and early adopted as
at the time of preparing these statements (February 2011), as issued by the International
Accounting Standards Board, and adopted by the European Union. These consolidated financial
statements are presented in thousands of United States dollars (USD), except otherwise indicated.
Elimination of all material intercompany transactions and balances between the Company and their
respective subsidiaries have been made in consolidation.
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost convention, as
modified by the revaluation of available-for-sale financial assets, and financial assets and
financial liabilities (including derivative instruments) at fair value through profit or loss.
Certain comparative amounts have been reclassified to conform to changes in presentation in the
current period. These reclassifications do not have a material effect on the Companys consolidated
financial statements.
These consolidated financial statements have been approved for issue by the Board of Directors on
February 22, 2011.
F-11
TERNIUM S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Contd.)
2 Basis of presentation (continued)
Detailed below are the companies whose financial statements have been included in these
consolidated financial statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of ownership at |
|
|
|
Country of |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
Company |
|
Organization |
|
Main activity |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Ternium S.A. |
|
Luxembourg |
|
Holding |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
Ternium Investments S.à.r.l. (1) |
|
Luxembourg |
|
Holding |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ternium Brasil S.A. (2) |
|
Brazil |
|
Holding |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
Siderúrgica do Norte Fluminense S.A. (3) |
|
Brazil |
|
Manufacturing and selling of steel products |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ylopa Servicos de Consultadoria Lda. (4) |
|
Portugal |
|
Holding |
|
|
94.38 |
% |
|
|
94.38 |
% |
|
|
94.38 |
% |
Consorcio Siderurgia Amazonia S.L.U. (5) |
|
Spain |
|
Holding |
|
|
94.38 |
% |
|
|
94.38 |
% |
|
|
94.38 |
% |
Secor- Servicios Corporativos S.A. (5) |
|
Venezuela |
|
Holding |
|
|
94.38 |
% |
|
|
94.38 |
% |
|
|
93.44 |
% |
Ternium Internacional España S.L.U. (2) |
|
Spain |
|
Marketing of steel products |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
Siderar S.A.I.C. (6) |
|
Argentina |
|
Manufacturing and selling of flat steel products |
|
|
60.94 |
% |
|
|
60.94 |
% |
|
|
60.93 |
% |
Impeco S.A. (7) |
|
Argentina |
|
Manufacturing of pipe products |
|
|
60.97 |
% |
|
|
60.97 |
% |
|
|
60.96 |
% |
Prosid Investments S.C.A. (7) |
|
Uruguay |
|
Holding |
|
|
60.94 |
% |
|
|
60.94 |
% |
|
|
60.93 |
% |
Inversiones Basilea S.A. (8) |
|
Chile |
|
Purchase and sale of real estate and other |
|
|
60.94 |
% |
|
|
60.94 |
% |
|
|
60.93 |
% |
Ternium Mexico S.A. de C.V. (9) |
|
Mexico |
|
Holding |
|
|
88.72 |
% |
|
|
88.71 |
% |
|
|
88.71 |
% |
Hylsa S.A. de C.V. (10) |
|
Mexico |
|
Manufacturing and selling of steel products |
|
|
88.72 |
% |
|
|
88.71 |
% |
|
|
88.71 |
% |
Las Encinas S.A. de C.V. (10) |
|
Mexico |
|
Exploration, exploitation and pelletizing of iron ore |
|
|
88.72 |
% |
|
|
88.71 |
% |
|
|
88.71 |
% |
Ferropak Comercial S.A. de C.V. (10) |
|
Mexico |
|
Scrap services company |
|
|
88.72 |
% |
|
|
88.71 |
% |
|
|
88.71 |
% |
Ferropak Servicios S.A. de C.V. (10) |
|
Mexico |
|
Services |
|
|
88.72 |
% |
|
|
88.71 |
% |
|
|
88.71 |
% |
Galvacer America Inc (10) |
|
USA |
|
Distributing company |
|
|
88.72 |
% |
|
|
88.71 |
% |
|
|
88.71 |
% |
Galvamet America Corp (10) |
|
USA |
|
Manufacturing and selling of insulated panel products |
|
|
88.72 |
% |
|
|
88.71 |
% |
|
|
88.71 |
% |
Transamerica E. & I. Trading Corp (10) |
|
USA |
|
Scrap company |
|
|
88.72 |
% |
|
|
88.71 |
% |
|
|
88.71 |
% |
Técnica Industrial S.A. de C.V. (10) |
|
Mexico |
|
Services |
|
|
88.72 |
% |
|
|
88.71 |
% |
|
|
88.71 |
% |
Sefimsa S.A. de C.V. (10) |
|
Mexico |
|
Financial Services |
|
|
88.72 |
% |
|
|
88.71 |
% |
|
|
88.71 |
% |
Ecore Holding S. de R.L. de C.V. (10) |
|
Mexico |
|
Holding |
|
|
88.72 |
% |
|
|
88.71 |
% |
|
|
88.71 |
% |
Neotec L.L.C. (10) |
|
USA |
|
Holding |
|
|
88.72 |
% |
|
|
88.71 |
% |
|
|
88.71 |
% |
Treasury Services S.A. de C.V. (10) |
|
Mexico |
|
Financial Services |
|
|
88.72 |
% |
|
|
88.71 |
% |
|
|
88.71 |
% |
APM, S.A. de C.V. (10) |
|
Mexico |
|
Manufacturing and selling of steel products |
|
|
88.72 |
% |
|
|
88.71 |
% |
|
|
88.71 |
% |
Acedor, S.A. de C.V. (10) |
|
Mexico |
|
Holding |
|
|
88.72 |
% |
|
|
88.71 |
% |
|
|
88.71 |
% |
Empresas Stabilit S.A. de C.V. (10) |
|
Mexico |
|
Holding |
|
|
88.72 |
% |
|
|
88.71 |
% |
|
|
88.71 |
% |
F-12
TERNIUM S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Contd.)
2 Basis of presentation (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of ownership at |
|
|
|
Country of |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
Company |
|
Organization |
|
Main activity |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Acerus S.A. de C.V. (10) |
|
Mexico |
|
Manufacturing and selling of steel products |
|
|
88.72 |
% |
|
|
88.71 |
% |
|
|
88.71 |
% |
Imsa Monclova S.A. de C.V. (10) |
|
Mexico |
|
Services |
|
|
88.72 |
% |
|
|
88.71 |
% |
|
|
88.71 |
% |
Ternium Internacional Guatemala S.A. (10) |
|
Guatemala |
|
Selling of steel products |
|
|
88.72 |
% |
|
|
88.71 |
% |
|
|
88.71 |
% |
Corporativo Grupo Imsa S.A. de C.V. (10) |
|
Mexico |
|
Services |
|
|
88.72 |
% |
|
|
88.71 |
% |
|
|
88.71 |
% |
Ternium USA Inc. (10) |
|
USA |
|
Manufacturing and selling of steel products |
|
|
88.72 |
% |
|
|
88.71 |
% |
|
|
88.71 |
% |
Consorcio Minero Benito Juarez Peña Colorada S.A.de C.V. (11) |
|
Mexico |
|
Exploration, exploitation and pelletizing of iron ore |
|
|
44.36 |
% |
|
|
44.36 |
% |
|
|
44.36 |
% |
Peña Colorada Servicios S.A. de C.V. (11) |
|
Mexico |
|
Services |
|
|
44.36 |
% |
|
|
44.36 |
% |
|
|
44.36 |
% |
Servicios Integrales Nova de Monterrey S.A. de C.V. (12) |
|
Mexico |
|
Medical and Social Services |
|
|
66.09 |
% |
|
|
66.09 |
% |
|
|
66.09 |
% |
Ternium Guatemala S.A. |
|
Guatemala |
|
Manufacturing and selling of steel products |
|
|
88.72 |
% |
|
|
88.71 |
% |
|
|
88.71 |
% |
Ternium Internacional Nicaragua S.A. |
|
Nicaragua |
|
Manufacturing and selling of steel products |
|
|
88.18 |
% |
|
|
88.18 |
% |
|
|
88.09 |
% |
Ternium Internacional Honduras S.A. de C.V. |
|
Honduras |
|
Manufacturing and selling of steel products |
|
|
88.01 |
% |
|
|
88.00 |
% |
|
|
88.00 |
% |
Ternium Internacional El Salvador, S.A. de C.V. |
|
El Salvador |
|
Manufacturing and selling of steel products |
|
|
88.66 |
% |
|
|
88.65 |
% |
|
|
88.65 |
% |
Ternium Internacional Costa Rica S.A. |
|
Costa Rica |
|
Manufacturing and selling of steel products |
|
|
88.72 |
% |
|
|
88.71 |
% |
|
|
88.71 |
% |
Ferrasa S.A.S. (13) |
|
Colombia |
|
Manufacturing and selling of steel products |
|
|
54.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Perfilamos del Cauca S.A.S. (13) |
|
Colombia |
|
Manufacturing and selling of steel products |
|
|
54.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Figuraciones S.A.S. (13) |
|
Colombia |
|
Manufacturing and selling of steel products |
|
|
54.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Siderúrgica de Caldas S.A.S. (13) |
|
Colombia |
|
Manufacturing and selling of steel products |
|
|
54.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recolectora Industrial de Colombia S.A. (1) |
|
Colombia |
|
Scrap services company |
|
|
28.70 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Procesadora de Materiales Industriales S.A. (1) |
|
Colombia |
|
Scrap services company |
|
|
32.40 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Desechos Industriales de Colombia S.A. (1) |
|
Colombia |
|
Scrap services company |
|
|
29.70 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tenigal S. de R.L. de C.V. (14) |
|
Mexico |
|
Manufacturing and selling of steel products |
|
|
51.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ternium Investments Switzerland AG (2) |
|
Switzerland |
|
Holding |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ternium Internacional S.A. (15) |
|
Uruguay |
|
Holding and marketing of steel products |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
Ternium International Ecuador S.A. (16) |
|
Ecuador |
|
Marketing of steel products |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
Ternium International USA Corporation (16) |
|
USA |
|
Marketing of steel products |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
F-13
TERNIUM S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Contd.)
2 Basis of presentation (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of ownership at |
|
|
|
Country of |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
Company |
|
Organization |
|
Main activity |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Ternium Internationaal B.V. (16) |
|
Netherlands |
|
Marketing of steel products |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
Ternium Internacional Perú S.A. (16) |
|
Peru |
|
Marketing of steel products |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
Ternium Internacional de Colombia S.A. (16) |
|
Colombia |
|
Marketing of steel products |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
Ternium Procurement S.A. (15) |
|
Uruguay |
|
Procurement services |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
Ternium International Inc. (15) |
|
Panama |
|
Marketing of steel products |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
Ternium Engineering & Services S.A. (17) |
|
Uruguay |
|
Engineering and other services |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Ternium Ingeniería y Servicios de Argentina S.A. |
|
Argentina |
|
Engineering and other services |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Ternium Ingeniería y Servicios de Mexico S.A. de C.V. |
|
Mexico |
|
Engineering and other services |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Ternium Treasury Services S.A. (15) |
|
Uruguay |
|
Financial Services |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
Ternium Treasury Services B.V. (15) |
|
Netherlands |
|
Financial Services |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
Ferrasa Panamá, S.A. (18) |
|
Panama |
|
Manufacturing and selling of steel products |
|
|
54.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aceros Transformados de Panamá, S.A. (18) |
|
Panama |
|
Manufacturing and selling of steel products |
|
|
54.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ternium Investments S.A. (formerly Dirken Company S.A.) (19) |
|
Uruguay |
|
Holding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Incorporated in the fourth quarter of 2010. |
|
(2) |
|
Indirectly through Ternium Investments S.à.r.l. Total voting rights held 100.00% |
|
(3) |
|
Indirectly through Ternium Brasil S.A. Total voting rights held: 100.00%. Incorporated during
2010. |
|
(4) |
|
Indirectly through Ternium Investments S.á.r.l. (85.62%) and Prosid Investments S.C.A.
(8.76%). Total voting rights held: 100.00% |
|
(5) |
|
Indirectly through Ylopa Servicos de Consultadoría Lda.. Total voting rights held:
100.00%. As of April 25, 2008, Consorcio Siderurgia Amazonia S.L.U. was relocated into Spain
(formerly Cayman Islands) |
|
(6) |
|
Indirectly through Ternium Internacional España S.L.U. Total voting rights held: 60.94% |
|
(7) |
|
Indirectly through Siderar S.A.I.C and Ternium Internacional S.A. Total voting rights held
100.00% |
|
(8) |
|
Indirectly through Siderar S.A.I.C. Total voting rights held 100.00% |
|
(9) |
|
Indirectly through Siderar S.A.I.C., Inversiones Basilea S.A. and Ternium Internacional
España S.L.U. Total voting rights held 99.93% |
|
(10) |
|
Indirectly through Ternium Mexico S.A. de C.V. Total voting rights held: 100.00% |
|
(11) |
|
Indirectly through Ternium Mexico S.A. de C.V. Total voting rights held: 50.00%. Consolidated
under the proportionate consolidation method. |
|
(12) |
|
Indirectly through Ternium Mexico S.A. de C.V. Total voting rights held: 74.50% |
|
(13) |
|
Indirectly through Ternium Internacional España S.L.U.. Total voting rights held: 54.00%.
Incorporated during 2010. (See note 3) |
|
(14) |
|
Indirectly through Ternium Internacional España S.L.U.. Total voting rights held: 51.00%.
Incorporated during 2010. (See note 31) |
|
(15) |
|
Indirectly through Ternium Investments Switzerland AG. Total voting rights held: 100.00% |
|
(16) |
|
Indirectly through Ternium Internacional S.A. Total voting rights held 100.00% |
|
(17) |
|
Indirectly through Ternium Internacional Inc.. Total voting rights held 100.00% |
|
(18) |
|
Indirectly through Ternium Treasury Services S.A. Total voting rights held: 54.00%.
Incorporated during 2010. (See note 3) |
|
(19) |
|
This company was dissolved as of December 6, 2010. |
F-14
TERNIUM S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Contd.)
3 Acquisition of business
Ferrasa S.A.S and Ferrasa Panamá S.A.
On August 25, 2010, Ternium completed the acquisition of a 54% ownership interest in Ferrasa
S.A.S., a company organized under the laws of Colombia (Ferrasa) through a capital contribution
in the amount of USD 74.5 million. Ferrasa has a 100% ownership interest in Sidecaldas S.A.S.
(Sidecaldas), Figuraciones S.A.S. (Figuraciones) and Perfilamos del Cauca S.A.S.
(Perfilamos), all of which are also Colombian companies. Ternium has also completed the
acquisition of a 54% ownership interest in Ferrasa Panamá S.A. (Ferrasa Panamá) and its
subsidiary Aceros Transformados de Panamá S.A. (Aceros) for USD 0.5 million. On the mentioned
date the Company obtained control over the assets and liabilities of the acquired companies.
Ferrasa is a long and flat steel products processor and distributor. Sidecaldas is a scrap-based
long steel making and rolling facility, with an annual production capacity of approximately 140,000
tons. Figuraciones and Perfilamos manufacture welded steel tubes, profiles and beams. These
companies have combined annual sales of approximately 300,000 tons, of which approximately 70% are
long products and 30% are flat and tubular products, used mainly in the construction sector.
Ferrasa Panamá is a long steel products processor and distributor based in Panama, with annual
sales of approximately 8,000 tons.
The former controlling shareholders have an option to sell to Ternium, at any time, all or part of
their remaining 46% interest in each of Ferrasa and Ferrasa Panamá, and Ternium has an option to
purchase all or part of that remaining interest from the former controlling shareholders, at any
time after the second anniversary of the closing.
Ferrasa and Ferrasa Panamá contributed revenues of USD 128.0 million and a net loss of USD 1.5
million (net of USD 1.3 million corresponding to non-controlling interests) in the period from
August 25, 2010 to December 31, 2010. The fair value and book value of assets and liabilities
arising from the transaction are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
Book value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
140,118 |
|
|
|
140,413 |
|
Previously recognized goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,377 |
|
Customer relationships |
|
|
15,403 |
|
|
|
|
|
Trademarks |
|
|
4,407 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other contractual rights |
|
|
4,064 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
76,771 |
|
|
|
76,241 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
6,593 |
|
|
|
6,593 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
7,832 |
|
|
|
1,180 |
|
Borrowings |
|
|
(134,120 |
) |
|
|
(134,120 |
) |
Other assets and liabilities, net |
|
|
15,141 |
|
|
|
15,141 |
|
Non-controlling interest in subsidiaries |
|
|
(236 |
) |
|
|
(236 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
136,015 |
|
|
|
142,631 |
|
Non-controlling interest |
|
|
(62,572 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
1,557 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Purchase Consideration |
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Company accounts for the acquired businesses using the purchase method of accounting which
requires that the assets acquired and liabilities assumed be recorded at the date of acquisition at
their respective fair values.
The application of the purchase method requires certain estimates and assumptions especially
concerning the determination of the fair values of the acquired intangible assets and property,
plant and equipment as well as the liabilities assumed at the date of the acquisition. Moreover the
useful lives of the acquired intangible assets, property, plant and equipment have to be
determined. The judgments made in the context of the purchase price allocation can materially
impact the Companys future results of operations. The valuations are based on information
available at the acquisition date.
F-15
TERNIUM S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Contd.)
3 Acquisition of business (continued)
Significant judgments and assumptions made regarding the purchase price allocation in the
course of the acquisition of Ferrasa and Ferrasa Panamá, included the following:
|
|
For valuation of customer relationship the excess earnings method was used, which is based on
calculating the present value of the future cash flows of the future economic benefits during the
remaining useful life attributable to the customer base. Customer relationships are being
amortized over an estimated useful life of 10 years. |
|
|
For the valuation of brands, the relief-from-royalty method was applied, both with the value that
a third party would have paid for these trademarks. The expected amortization of these assets is
determined on the basis of the expected benefit the asset provides the entity (e.g. expected
decline in value). For valuation of the other contractual rights, the postulated loss of income
method was used. Both intangible assets are being amortized over an estimated useful life of 10
years. |
|
|
The valuation of acquired intangible assets is to a great extent based on anticipated cash flows.
Nevertheless it is possible that actual outcomes could vary significantly from such estimated
future cash flows. |
|
|
For property, plant and equipment, fair values were derived from expert appraisals. |
|
|
The valuation of inventories at the date of acquisition was based on the corresponding selling
price less estimated costs of completion or estimated costs to make the sale. |
The excess of the purchase price for Ferrasa and Ferrasa Panamá over the estimated fair values of
the net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill amounting to USD 1.6 million as of August 25, 2010.
Goodwill derives mainly from the fair value of the going concern element of the acquiree.
The Company has chosen to recognize the non-controlling interest at its proportionate share in net
identifiable assets acquired.
Acquisition related costs are included in the income statement.
Pro forma data for the acquisitions
Had the Ferrasa transaction been consummated on January 1, 2010, unaudited pro forma net sales and
net loss totaling USD 336 million and USD 4 million, respectively, would have been included in
Terniums financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2010. These pro forma results were
prepared based on unaudited accounting records maintained prior to such transaction and adjusted by
depreciation and amortization of tangible and intangible assets and interest expense of the
borrowing incurred for the transaction as described above.
4 Accounting policies
These Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared following the same accounting
policies used in the preparation of the audited Consolidated Financial Statements for the year
ended December 31, 2009, except for the application of the following accounting pronouncements,
which became effective on January 1, 2010:
IFRS 3 (revised January 2008), Business Combinations
The revised standard continues to apply the acquisition method to business combinations, with
some significant changes. Those changes refer principally to the following:
|
|
Partial acquisitions: Non-controlling interests are measured either as their proportionate
interest in the net identifiable assets (which is the original IFRS 3 requirement) or at fair value
(which is the new requirement). |
|
|
Step acquisitions: The requirement to measure at fair value every asset and liability at each
step for the purposes of calculating a portion of goodwill has been removed. Instead, goodwill is
measured as the difference at acquisition date between the fair value of any investment in the
business held before the acquisition, the consideration transferred and the net assets acquired. |
|
|
Acquisition-related costs: Acquisition-related costs are generally recognized as expenses (rather
than included in goodwill). |
F-16
TERNIUM S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Contd.)
4 Accounting policies (continued)
The following is a summary of the principal accounting policies followed in the preparation of
these consolidated financial statements:
(a) Group accounting
(1) Subsidiary companies and transactions with non-controlling interests
Subsidiaries are all entities over which the Company has the power to govern the financial and
operating policies generally accompanying a shareholding of more than one half of the voting
rights. Subsidiaries are fully consolidated from the date on which control is transferred to the
Company. They are deconsolidated from the date that control ceases.
The Company uses the acquisition method of accounting to account for business combinations. The
consideration transferred for the acquisition of a subsidiary is the fair values of the assets
transferred, the liabilities incurred and the equity interests issued by the Company. The
consideration transferred includes the fair value of any asset or liability resulting from a
contingent consideration arrangement. Acquisition-related costs are expensed as incurred.
Identifiable assets acquired and liabilities and contingent liabilities assumed in a business
combination are measured initially at the fair values at the acquisition date. Indemnification
assets are recognized at the same time that the Company recognizes the indemnified item and
measures them on the same basis as the indemnified item, subject to the need for a valuation
allowance for uncollectible amounts. The Company measure the value of a reacquired right recognized
as an intangible asset on the basis of the remaining contractual term of the related contract
regardless of whether market participants would consider potential contractual renewals in
determining its fair value.
On an acquisition-by-acquisition basis, the Company recognizes any non-controlling interest in the
acquiree at the non-controlling interests proportionate share of the acquirees net assets.
The excess of the consideration transferred, the amount of any non-controlling interest in the
acquiree and the acquisition-date fair value of any previous equity interest in the acquiree over
the fair value of the Companys share of the identifiable net assets acquired is recorded as
goodwill. If this is less than the fair value of the net assets of the subsidiary acquired in the
case of a bargain purchase, the difference is recognized directly in the income statement.
The measurement period is the earlier of the date that the acquirer receives the information that
it is looking for or cannot obtain the information and one year after the acquisition date. Where
the accounting for a business combination is not complete by the end of the reporting period in
which the business combination occurred provisional amounts are reported.
The Company treats transactions with non-controlling interests as transactions with equity owners
of the Company. For purchases from non-controlling interests, the difference between any
consideration paid and the relevant share acquired of the carrying value of net assets of the
subsidiary is recorded in equity. Gains or losses on disposals to non-controlling interests are
also recorded in equity.
When the Company ceases to have control or significant influence, any retained interest in the
entity is remeasured to its fair value, with the change in carrying amount recognized in profit or
loss. The fair value is the initial carrying amount for the purposes of subsequently accounting for
the retained interest as an associate, joint venture or financial asset. In addition, any amounts
previously recognized in other comprehensive income in respect of that entity are accounted for as
if the group had directly disposed of the related assets or liabilities. This may mean that amounts
previously recognized in other comprehensive income are reclassified to profit or loss.
Inter-company transactions, balances and unrealized gains on transactions between group companies
are eliminated. Unrealized losses are also eliminated. Accounting policies of subsidiaries have
been changed where necessary to ensure consistency with the policies adopted by the group. However,
the fact that the functional currency of some subsidiaries is their respective local currency,
generates some financial gains (losses) arising from intercompany transactions, that are included
in the consolidated income statement under Other financial expenses, net.
(2) Joint ventures
The Company reports its interests in jointly controlled entities using proportionate consolidation.
The Companys share of the assets, liabilities, income, expenses and cash flows of jointly
controlled entities are combined on a line-by-line basis with similar items in the Companys
financial statements.
Where the Company transacts with its jointly controlled entities, unrealized profits and losses are
eliminated to the extent of the Companys interest in the joint venture.
F-17
TERNIUM S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Contd.)
4 Accounting policies (continued)
(3) Associated companies
Associated companies are entities in which Ternium generally has between 20% and 50% of the voting
rights, or over which Ternium has significant influence, but which it does not control. Investments
in associated companies are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. Under this method
the Companys share of the post-acquisition profits or losses of an associated company is
recognized in the income statement and its share of post-acquisition changes in reserves is
recognized in reserves. The cumulative post-acquisition changes are adjusted against the cost of
the investment. Unrealized gains on transactions among the Company and its associated companies are
eliminated to the extent of the Companys interest in such associated company; unrealized losses
are also eliminated unless the transaction provides evidence of an impairment of the transferred
asset. When the Companys share of losses in an associated company equals or exceeds its interest
in such associate, the Company does not recognize further losses unless it has incurred obligations
or made payments on behalf of such associated company.
If the ownership interest in an associate is reduced but significant influence is retained, only a
proportionate share of the amounts previously recognized in other comprehensive income are
reclassified to profit or loss where appropriate.
(b) Foreign currency translation
(1) Functional and presentation currency
Items included in the financial statements of each of the Companys subsidiaries and associated
companies are measured using the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity
operates (the functional currency). The functional and presentation currency of the Company is
the U.S. dollar. Although Ternium is located in Luxembourg, it operates in several countries with
different currencies. The USD is the currency that best reflects the economic substance of the
underlying events and circumstances relevant to Ternium as a whole.
(2) Subsidiary companies
The results and financial position of all the group entities (none of which operates in a
hyperinflationary economy) that have a functional currency different from the presentation
currency, are translated into the presentation currency as follows:
(i) assets and liabilities are translated at the closing rate of each statement of financial
position;
(ii) income and expenses for each income statement are translated at average exchange rates; and
(iii) all resulting translation differences are recognized within other comprehensive income.
In the case of a sale or other disposition of any such subsidiary, any accumulated translation
differences would be recognized in the income statement as part of the gain or loss on sale.
(3) Transactions in currencies other than the functional currency
Transactions in currencies other than the functional currency are translated into the functional
currency using the exchange rates prevailing at the date of the transactions or valuation where
items are re-measured.
At the end of each reporting period: (i) monetary items denominated in currencies other than the
functional currency are translated using the closing rates, (ii) non-monetary items that are
measured in terms of historical cost in a currency other than the functional currency are
translated using the exchange rates prevailing at the date of the transactions; and (iii)
non-monetary items that are measured at fair value in a currency other than the functional currency
are translated using the exchange rates prevailing at the date when the fair value was determined.
Foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from the settlement of such transactions and from the
translation at year-end exchange rates of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in currencies
other than the functional currency are recorded as gains and losses from foreign exchange and
included in Other financial income (expenses), net in the consolidated income statement, except
when deferred in equity as qualifying cash flow hedges and qualifying net investment hedges.
Translation differences on non-monetary financial assets and liabilities such as equities held at
fair value through profit or loss are recognized in profit or loss as part of the fair value gain
or loss, while translation differences on non-monetary financial assets such as equities
classified as available for sale are included in the available for sale reserve in equity.
Ternium had no such assets or liabilities for any of the periods presented.
F-18
TERNIUM S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Contd.)
4 Accounting policies (continued)
(c) Financial instruments
Non derivative financial instruments
Non derivative financial instruments comprise investments in equity and debt securities, trade and
other receivables, cash and cash equivalents, loans and borrowings, and trade and other payables.
Ternium non derivative financial instruments are classified into the following categories:
|
|
|
Financial instruments at fair value through profit or loss: comprises mainly cash
and cash equivalents and investments in debt securities held for trading; |
|
|
|
Held-to-maturity instruments: measured at amortized cost using the effective
interest method less impairment losses. As of December 31, 2010, there are no
instruments classified under this category; |
|
|
|
Loans and receivables: measured at amortized cost using the effective interest
method less impairment losses; |
|
|
|
Available-for-sale (AFS) financial assets: gains and losses arising from changes
in fair value are recognized within other comprehensive income (OCI) with the
exception of impairment losses, interest calculated using the effective interest method
and foreign exchange gains and losses on monetary assets, which are recognized directly
in profit or loss. Where the investment is disposed of or is determined to be impaired,
the cumulative gain or loss previously recognized in OCI is included in the income
statement for the period. As of December 31, 2010, there are no instruments classified
under this category; |
|
|
|
Other financial liabilities: measured at amortized cost using the effective interest
method. |
The classification depends on the nature and purpose of the financial assets and is determined at
the time of initial recognition.
Financial assets and liabilities are recognized and derecognized on the settlement date.
Financial assets are initially measured at fair value, net of transaction costs, except for those
financial assets classified as financial assets at fair value through profit or loss.
Financial liabilities, including borrowings, are initially measured at fair value, net of
transaction costs and subsequently measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method,
with interest expense recognized on an effective yield basis.
Impairment of financial assets
The Company assesses at the end of each reporting period whether there is objective evidence that a
financial asset or group of financial assets is impaired. A financial asset or a group of financial
assets is impaired and impairment losses are incurred only if there is objective evidence of
impairment as a result of one or more events that occurred after the initial recognition of the
asset (a loss event) and that loss event (or events) has an impact on the estimated future cash
flows of the financial asset or group of financial assets that can be reliably estimated. The
Company first assesses whether objective evidence of impairment exists.
For loans and receivables category and for held-to-maturity investments, the amount of the loss is
measured as the difference between the assets carrying amount and the present value of estimated
future cash flows (excluding future credit losses that have not been incurred) discounted at the
financial assets original effective interest rate. The carrying amount of the asset is reduced and
the amount of the loss is recognized in the consolidated income statement.
If, in a subsequent period, the amount of the impairment loss decreases and the decrease can be
related objectively to an event occurring after the impairment was recognized, the reversal of the
previously recognized impairment loss is recognized in the consolidated income statement.
Derivative financial instruments
Information about accounting for derivative financial instruments and hedging activities is
included in Note 34 Financial Risk management.
(d) Property, plant and equipment
Land and buildings comprise mainly factories and offices. All property, plant and equipment are
recognized at historical acquisition or construction cost less accumulated depreciation and
accumulated impairment (if applicable), except for land, which is carried at acquisition cost less
accumulated impairment (if applicable). There are no material residual values for property, plant
and equipment items.
Major overhaul and rebuilding expenditures are recognized as a separate asset when future economic
benefits are expected from the item, and the cost can be measured reliably.
F-19
TERNIUM S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Contd.)
4 Accounting policies (continued)
Ordinary maintenance expenses on manufacturing properties are recorded as cost of products sold
in the period in which they are incurred.
Where a tangible fixed asset comprises major components having different useful lives, these
components are accounted for as separate items.
Leases where the lessor retains a significant portion of the risks and rewards of ownership are
classified as operating leases. Payments made under operating leases (net of any incentives
received from the lessor) are charged to the income statement on a straight-line basis over the
period of the lease.
Depreciation method is reviewed at each year end. Depreciation is calculated using the
straight-line method to amortize the cost of each asset to its residual value over its estimated
useful life as follows:
|
|
|
Land |
|
No Depreciation |
Buildings and improvements |
|
15-40 years |
Production equipment |
|
5-25 years |
Vehicles, furniture and fixtures and other equipment |
|
5-15 years |
The assets useful lives are reviewed, and adjusted if appropriate, at each year end.
Gains and losses on disposals are determined by comparing the proceeds with the corresponding
carrying amounts and are included in the income statement.
If the carrying amount of an asset were greater than its estimated recoverable amount, it would be
written down to its recoverable amount. (see Note 4 (f) Impairment).
(e) Intangible assets
(1) Information system projects
Generally, costs associated with developing or maintaining computer software programs are
recognized as an expense as incurred. However, costs directly related to the acquisition and
implementation of information systems are recognized as intangible assets if they have a probable
economic benefit exceeding the cost beyond one year and comply with the recognition criteria of IAS
38.
Information system projects recognized as assets are amortized using the straight-line method over
their useful lives, not exceeding a period of 3 years. Amortization charges are included in cost of
sales, selling, general and administrative expenses.
(2) Mining concessions
Mining license was recognized as a separate intangible asset upon the acquisition of Hylsamex and
comprises the right to exploit the mines and is recognized at its fair value at acquisition date
less accumulated amortization. Amortization charge is calculated by using the unit-of-production
method, on the basis of actual mineral extracted in each period compared to the estimated mineral
reserves, and is included in cost of sales. The resulting amortization rate for the years ended
December 31, 2010 and 2009, is approximately 9% per annum.
(3) Exploration costs
Exploration and evaluation costs are measured at cost. Costs directly associated with exploration
activities and leasehold acquisition costs are capitalized until the determination of reserves is
evaluated. If it is determined that commercial discovery has not been achieved, these costs are
charged to expense. If it is determined that commercial discovery has been achieved, costs incurred
are reclassified into Property, Plant and Equipment or Intangible Assets according to the nature of
the expenditure and amortization starts. Exploration costs are tested for impairment annually. No
impairment losses have been recorded for any of the years presented.
(4) Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of the acquisition cost over the fair value of Terniums
participation in acquired companies net assets at the acquisition date. Under IFRS 3 (revised),
goodwill is considered to have an indefinite life and not amortized, but is subject to annual
impairment testing.
Goodwill is allocated to Cash-generating units (CGU) for the purpose of impairment testing. The
allocation is made to those cash-generating units expected to benefit from the business combination
which generated the goodwill being tested.
F-20
TERNIUM S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Contd.)
4 Accounting policies (continued)
As of December 31, 2010, the carrying amount of goodwill allocated to the Mexico CGU was USD
744.0 million, while the carrying amount of goodwill allocated to other CGUs totaled USD 6.1
million.
(5) Research and development
Research expenditures are recognized as expenses as incurred. Development costs are recorded as
cost of sales in the income statement as incurred because they do not fulfill the criteria for
capitalization. Research and development expenditures for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009
and 2008 totaled USD 5.7 million, USD 6.0 million and USD 7.0 million, respectively.
(6) Customer relationships acquired in a business combination
In accordance with IFRS 3 (revised) and IAS 38, Ternium has recognized the value of customer
relationships separately from goodwill in connection with the acquisitions of Grupo Imsa and
Ferrasa S.A.S.
Customer relationships are amortized using the straight-line method over a useful life of
approximately 10 years.
(7) Trademarks acquired in a business combination
In accordance with IFRS 3 and IAS 38, Ternium has recognized the value of trademarks separately
from goodwill in connection with the acquisitions of Grupo Imsa and Ferrasa S.A.S.
Trademarks are amortized using the straight-line method over a useful life of between 5 to 10
years.
(f) Impairment
Assets that have an indefinite useful life (including goodwill) are not subject to amortization and
are tested annually for impairment. Assets that are subject to amortization and investments in
affiliates are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that
the carrying amount may not be recoverable. An impairment loss is recognized for the amount by
which the assets carrying amount exceeds its recoverable amount. The recoverable amount is the
higher of an assets fair value less cost to sell and the value in use.
To carry out these tests, assets are grouped at the lowest levels for which there are separately
identifiable cash flows (each, a CGU). When evaluating long-lived assets for potential impairment,
the Company estimates the recoverable amount based on the value in use of the corresponding CGU.
The value in use of each CGU is determined on the basis of the present value of net future cash
flows which will be generated by the assets tested.
Determining the present value of future cash flows involves highly sensitive estimates and
assumptions specific to the nature of each CGUs activities, including estimates and assumptions
relating to amount and timing of projected future cash flows, expected changes in market prices,
expected changes in the demand of Ternium products and services, selected discount rate; and
selected tax rate.
Ternium uses cash flow projections for the next five years based on past performance and
expectations of market development; thereafter, it uses a perpetuity rate with no growth increase.
Application of the discounted cash flow (DCF) method to determine the value in use of a CGU begins
with a forecast of all expected future net cash flows. Variables considered in forecasts include
the gross domestic product (GDP) growth rates of the country under study and their correlation with
steel demand, level of steel prices and estimated raw material costs as observed in industry
reports.
Cash flows are discounted at post-tax rates that reflect specific country and currency risks
associated with the cash flow projections. The discount rates used are based on Terniums weighted
average cost of capital (WACC), which is considered to be a good indicator of cost of capital. As
of December 31, 2010, the discount rate used to test goodwill allocated to Mexico CGU for
impairment was 11.4%.
As a result of the above factors, actual cash flows and values could vary significantly from the
forecasted future cash flows and related values derived using discounting techniques. Based on the
information currently available, however, Ternium believes that it is not reasonably possible that
the variation would cause the carrying amount to exceed the recoverable amount of the CGUs.
At December 31, 2009, an impairment provision over the agreement with Corus recognized as
intangible assets, was recorded for the amount of USD 27.0 million. See note 27 (ii). At December
31, 2010 and 2008, no impairment provisions were recorded.
(g) Other investments
Other investments consist primarily of investments in financial debt instruments and equity
investments where the Company holds less than 20% of the outstanding equity and does not exert
significant influence.
F-21
TERNIUM S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Contd.)
4 Accounting policies (continued)
All purchases and sales of investments are recognized on the settlement date, which is not
significantly different from the trade date, which is the date that Ternium commits to purchase or
sell the investment.
Income from financial instruments is recognized in Other financial income (expenses), net in the
income statement. Interest receivable on investments in debt securities is calculated using the
effective rate. Dividends from investments in equity instruments are recognized in the income
statement when the Companys right to receive payments is established.
(h) Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (calculated using the first-in-first-out FIFO method)
or net realizable value. The cost of finished goods and goods in process comprises raw materials,
direct labor, depreciation, other direct costs and related production overhead costs. It excludes
borrowing costs. Goods acquired in transit at year end are valued at suppliers invoice cost.
The Company assesses the recoverability of its inventories considering their selling prices, if the
inventories are damaged, or if they have become wholly or partially obsolete (see note 4 (w) (4)).
(i) Trade receivables and other receivables
Trade and other receivables are carried at face value less an allowance for doubtful accounts,
if applicable. This amount does not differ significantly from fair value.
A provision for impairment is established when there is objective evidence that a financial asset
or group of assets is impaired. Objective evidence that a financial asset or group of assets is
impaired includes observable data that comes to the attention of the Company about a loss event,
such as a significant financial difficulty of the obligor or a breach of contract. The amount of
the impairment is determined as the difference between the assets carrying amount and the present
value of estimated future cash flows discounted at the assets original effective interest rate.
The amount of the loss is recognized in the income statement.
(j) Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents and highly liquid short-term securities are carried at fair market value,
except for time deposits which are carried at amortized cost and its amount does not differ
significantly from its fair value.
For purposes of the cash flow statement, cash and cash equivalents comprise cash, bank current
accounts and short-term highly liquid investments (original maturity of three months or less at
date of acquisition) and overdrafts.
In the consolidated statement of financial position, bank overdrafts are included in borrowings
within current liabilities.
(k) Non current assets (disposal groups) classified as held for sale
Non-current assets (disposal groups) are classified as assets held for sale, complying with the
recognition criteria of IFRS 5, and stated at the lower of carrying amount and fair value less
cost to sell if their carrying amount is recovered principally through a sale transaction rather
than through continuing use.
The carrying value of non-current assets classified as held for sale, at December 31, 2010 and 2009
totals USD 10.0 million and USD 9.2 million, respectively, which corresponds principally to land
and other real estate items. Sale is expected to be completed within a one-year period.
(l) Borrowings
Borrowings are recognized initially for an amount equal to the proceeds received. In subsequent
periods, borrowings are stated at amortized cost; any difference between proceeds and the
redemption value is recognized in the income statement over the period of the borrowings.
Capitalized costs for issue of debt are amortized over the life of their respective debt.
(m) Income taxes current and deferred
The current income tax charge is calculated on the basis of the tax laws in force in the countries
in which Terniums subsidiaries operate. Management evaluates positions taken in tax returns with
respect to situations in which applicable tax regulation could be subject to interpretation. A
liability is recorded for tax benefits that were taken in the applicable tax return but have not
been recognized for financial reporting.
Deferred income taxes are calculated using the liability method on temporary differences arising
between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts in the financial
statements. The principal temporary differences arise on fixed assets, intangible assets,
inventories valuation and provisions for pensions. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured
at the tax rates that are expected to apply in the period when the asset is realized or the
liability is settled, based on tax rates and tax laws that have been enacted or substantially
enacted at year end. Under IFRS, deferred income tax assets (liabilities) are classified as
non-current assets (liabilities).
F-22
TERNIUM S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Contd.)
4 Accounting policies (continued)
Deferred tax assets are recognized to the extent it is probable that future taxable income will
be available to offset temporary differences.
Deferred income tax is provided on temporary differences arising on investments in subsidiaries and
associated companies, except where the timing of the reversal of the temporary difference is
controlled by the Company and it is probable that the temporary difference will not reverse in the
foreseeable future.
Under Mexican law, Terniums subsidiaries are required to pay their employees an annual benefit
which is determined as a percentage of taxable profit for the year.
In 2008, Hylsa S.A. de C.V. (Hylsa) entered into a spin off that became effective on March 31,
2008. After this corporate reorganization, all of Hylsas employees stayed in the payroll of this
company, which is expected to generate non-significant taxable income and non-significant temporary
differences. Hylsa agreed to pay its employees a bonus salary that will be calculated on the basis
of agreed-upon criteria. Accordingly, during the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company reversed
the outstanding balance of the deferred tax liability recorded in connection with the statutory
profit sharing as of December 31, 2007 (amounting to USD 96 million) and disclosed the related gain
within Income tax (expense) benefit line item in the consolidated income statement.
(n) Employee liabilities
(1) Pension obligations
The Company has defined benefit and defined contribution plans. A defined benefit plan is a pension
plan that defines an amount of pension benefit that an employee will receive on retirement, usually
dependent on one or more factors such as age, years of service and compensation.
The liability recognized in the statement of financial position in respect of defined benefit
pension plans is the present value of the defined benefit obligation at year end, together with
adjustments for unrecognized actuarial gains or losses and past service costs. The defined benefit
obligation is calculated annually (at year end) by independent actuaries using the projected unit
credit method.
Actuarial gains and losses arising from experience adjustments and changes in actuarial
assumptions are charged or credited to income over the employees expected average remaining
working lives.
Past-service costs are recognized immediately in income, unless the changes to the pension plan are
conditional on the employees remaining in service for a specified period of time (the vesting
period). In this case, the past-service costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over the
vesting period.
Mexico
Ternium Mexico has defined benefit and defined contribution plans.
The valuation of the liabilities for the defined benefit employee retirement plans (pensions and
seniority premiums) covers all employees and is based primarily on their years of service, their
present age and their remuneration at the date of retirement. The cost of the employee retirement
plans (pension, health-care expenses and seniority premiums) is recognized as an expense in the
year in which services are rendered in accordance with actuarial studies made by independent
actuaries. The formal retirement plans are congruent with and complementary to the retirement
benefits established by the Mexican Institute of Social Security. Additionally, the Company has
established a plan to cover health-care expenses of retired employees. The Company has established
irrevocable trust funds for the payment of pensions and seniority premiums, as well as for
health-care expenses.
The defined contribution plans provides a benefit equivalent to the capital accumulated with the
companys contributions, which are provided as a match of employees contribution to the plan. The
plan provides vested rights according to the years of service and the cause of retirement.
Argentina
Siderar implemented an unfunded defined benefit employee retirement plan for certain senior
officers. The plan is designed to provide certain benefits to those officers (additional to those
contemplated under applicable argentine labor laws) in case of terminations of the employment
relationship due to certain specified events, including retirement. For its main plan, Siderar is
accumulating assets for the ultimate payment of those benefits in the form of investments that
carry time limitations for their redemption. The investments are not part of a particular plan, nor
are they segregated from Siderars other assets, and therefore this plan is classified as
unfunded under IFRS definitions. Benefits provided by the plan are denominated in U.S. Dollars
and are calculated based on a seven-year salary average.
F-23
TERNIUM S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Contd.)
4 Accounting policies (continued)
(2) Termination benefits
Termination benefits are payable when employment is terminated before the normal retirement date,
or whenever an employee accepts voluntary redundancy in exchange for these benefits. The Company
recognizes termination benefits when it is demonstrably committed to either: (i) terminating the
employment of current employees according to a detailed formal plan without possibility of
withdrawal or (ii) providing termination benefits as a result of an offer made to encourage
voluntary redundancy.
(3) Other compensation obligations
Employee entitlements to annual leave and long-service leave are accrued as earned.
During 2007, Ternium launched an incentive retention program (the Program) applicable to certain
senior officers and employees of the Company, who will be granted a number of Units throughout the
duration of the Program. The value of each of these Units is based on Terniums shareholders
equity (excluding minority interest). Also, the beneficiaries of the Program are entitled to
receive cash amounts based on (i) the amount of dividend payments made by Ternium to its
shareholders, and (ii) the number of Units held by each beneficiary to the Program. Units vest
ratably over a period of four years and will be redeemed by the Company ten years after grant date,
with the option of an early redemption at seven years after grant date.
As of December 31, 2010, the outstanding liability corresponding to the Program amounts to USD 10.8
million. The total value of the units granted to date under the program, considering the number of
units and the book value per share as of December 31, 2010, is USD 12.6 million.
(4) Social security contributions
Social security laws in force in the countries in which the Company operates provide for pension
benefits to be paid to retired employees from government pension plans and/or private fund managed
plans to which employees may elect to contribute. As stipulated by the respective laws, Siderar and
Ternium Mexico make monthly contributions calculated based on each employees salary to fund such
plans. The related amounts are expensed as incurred. No additional liabilities exist once the
contributions are paid.
(o) Provisions and other liabilities
Ternium has certain contingencies with respect to existing or potential claims, lawsuits and other
proceedings. Unless otherwise specified, Ternium accrues a provision for a present legal or
constructive obligation as a result of a past event, when it is probable that future cost could be
incurred and that cost can be reasonably estimated. Generally, accruals are based on developments
to date, Terniums estimates of the outcomes of these matters and the advice of Terniums legal
advisors.
(p) Trade payables
Trade payables are recognized initially at fair value and subsequently measured at amortized cost
using the effective interest method.
(q) Revenue recognition
Revenues are recognized as sales when revenue is earned and is realized or realizable. This
includes satisfying all of the following criteria: the arrangement with the customer is evident,
usually through the receipt of a purchase order; the sales price is fixed or determinable; delivery
as defined by the risk transfer provision of the sales contracts has occurred, and collectibility
is reasonably assured.
Interest income is recognized on an effective yield basis.
(r) Borrowing Costs
Beginning on January 1, 2009, and as required by IAS 23 revised, Ternium capitalizes the borrowing
costs incurred to finance construction, acquisition or production of qualifying assets. In the case
of specific borrowings, Ternium determines the amount of borrowing costs eligible for
capitalization as the actual borrowing costs incurred on that borrowing during the period less any
investment income on the temporary investment of those borrowings. For general borrowings, Ternium
determines the amount of borrowing costs eligible for capitalization by applying a capitalization
rate to the expenditures on that asset. The capitalization rate is the weighted average of the
borrowing costs applicable to the borrowings that are outstanding during the period, other than
borrowings made specifically for the purpose of obtaining a qualifying asset. The amount of
borrowing costs that Ternium capitalizes during a period will not exceed the amount of borrowing
costs incurred during that period. At December 31, 2010, the capitalized borrowing costs are not
material.
F-24
TERNIUM S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Contd.)
4 Accounting policies (continued)
(s) Cost of sales, selling, general and administrative expenses
Cost of sales and expenses are recognized in the income statement on the accrual basis of
accounting.
(t) Earnings per share
Earnings per share are calculated by dividing the net income attributable to shareholders by the
daily weighted average number of ordinary shares issued during the year (see Note 28).
(u) Derivative financial instruments and hedging activities
Ternium designates certain derivatives as hedges of a particular risk associated with a recognized
asset or liability or a highly probable forecast transaction. These transactions are classified as
cash flow hedges (mainly interest rate swaps, collars and commodities contracts). The effective
portion of the fair value of derivatives that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges is
recognized in OCI. Amounts accumulated in OCI are recognized in the income statement in the same
period as any offsetting losses and gains on the hedged item. The gain or loss relating to the
ineffective portion is recognized immediately in the income statement. The fair value of Ternium
derivative financial instruments (asset or liability) continues to be reflected on the statement of
financial position.
For transactions designated and qualifying for hedge accounting, Ternium documents the relationship
between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as its risk management objectives and
strategy for undertaking various hedge transactions. At December 31, 2010, the effective portion of
designated cash flow hedges amounts to USD 22.4 million (net of taxes for USD 9.6 million) and is
included under changes in the fair value of derivatives classified as cash flow hedges line item
in the statement of comprehensive income (see Note 32 (a)).
More information about accounting for derivative financial instruments and hedging activities is
included in Note 34 Financial risk management.
(v) Segment information
Reportable operating segments: for management purposes, the Company is organized on a worldwide
basis into the following segments: flat steel products, long steel products and others.
The flat steel products segment comprises the manufacturing and marketing of hot rolled coils and
sheets, cold rolled coils and sheets, tin plate, welded pipes, hot dipped galvanized and
electro-galvanized sheets, pre-painted sheets and other tailor-made products to serve its
customers requirements.
The long steel products segment comprises the manufacturing and marketing of billets (steel in its
basic, semi-finished state), wire rod and bars.
The other products segment includes products other than flat and long steel, mainly pig iron,
pellets and pre-engineered metal buildings.
(w) Critical Accounting Estimates
The preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that
affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and the related
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Estimates and judgments are continually evaluated
and are based on historical experience and other factors, including expectations of future events
that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Management makes estimates and
assumptions concerning the future. Actual results may differ significantly from these estimates
under different assumptions or conditions.
The principal estimates and assumptions that have a significant risk of causing a material
adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next financial year are
addressed below.
(1) Goodwill impairment test
Assessment of the recoverability of the carrying value of goodwill requires significant judgment.
Management evaluates goodwill allocated to the operating units for impairment on an annual basis.
Goodwill is tested at the level of the CGU. Impairment testing of the CGU is carried out and the
value in use determined in accordance with the accounting policy stated in Note 4(f). The discount
rates used for these tests are based on Terniums weighted average cost of capital adjusted for
specific country and currency risks associated with the cash flow projections. Discount rate used
at December 31, 2010 was 11.4% and no impairment charge resulted from the impairment test
performed.
F-25
TERNIUM S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Contd.)
4 Accounting policies (continued)
(2) Income taxes
Management calculates current and deferred income taxes according to the tax laws applicable to
each subsidiary in the countries in which such subsidiaries operate. However, certain adjustments
necessary to determine the income tax provision are finalized only after the balance sheet is
issued. In cases in which the final tax outcome is different from the amounts that were initially
recorded, such differences will impact the income tax and deferred tax provisions in the period in
which such determination is made.
Also, when assessing the recoverability of tax assets, management considers the scheduled reversal
of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income and tax planning strategies.
(3) Loss contingencies
Ternium is subject to various claims, lawsuits and other legal proceedings that arise in the
ordinary course of business, including customer claims in which a third party is seeking
reimbursement or indemnity. The Companys liability with respect to such claims, lawsuits and other
legal proceedings cannot be estimated with certainty. Periodically, management reviews the status
of each significant matter and assesses potential financial exposure. If the potential loss from
the claim or proceeding is considered probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated, a
liability is recorded. Management estimates the amount of such liability based on the information
available and the assumptions and methods it has concluded are appropriate, in accordance with the
provisions of IFRS. Accruals for such contingencies reflect a reasonable estimate of the losses to
be incurred based on information available, including the relevant litigation or settlement
strategy, as of the date of preparation of these financial statements. As additional information
becomes available, management will reassess its evaluation of the pending claims, lawsuits and
other proceedings and revise its estimates. The loss contingencies provision amounts to USD 16.1
million and USD 18.9 million as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
(4) Allowance for obsolescence of supplies and spare parts and slow-moving inventory
Management assesses the recoverability of its inventories considering their selling prices or
whether they are damaged or have become wholly or partly obsolete.
Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less the
costs of completion and selling expenses.
The Company establishes an allowance for obsolete or slow-moving inventory in connection with
finished goods and goods in process. The allowance for slow-moving inventory is recognized for
finished goods and goods in process based on managements analysis of their aging. In connection
with supplies and spare parts, the calculation is based on managements analysis of their aging,
the capacity of such materials to be used based on their levels of preservation and maintenance,
and their potential obsolescence due to technological change.
As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company recorded no allowance for net realizable value and
USD 68.2 million and USD 58.2 million, respectively, as allowance for obsolescence.
During 2010, no charges were recorded in connection with net realizable value allowance. Charges to
mark the inventory to net realizable value in 2009 and 2008 were USD 127.6 million and USD 200.0
million, respectively. Of these amounts, USD 82.8 million in 2009 and USD 179.6 million in 2008
corresponded to inventories for shipments to North America region, while USD 44.8 million in 2009
and USD 20.4 million in 2008 corresponded to inventories for exports within the South and Central
America region.
The additions to the allowance for net realizable value recorded during 2009 and 2008 responded to
the steep fall of steel prices as a result of the global financial crisis that began in 2008.
Beginning in the second half of 2008 up to the first half of 2009 average prices of flat steel
products decreased 41%. Accordingly, inventory values were compared to their estimated net selling
prices and written down when the selling prices were lower than historical costs. This was the case
of inventories produced from third-party slabs in Mexico and certain raw materials in Argentina
that had been acquired at market prices in force prior to the beginning of the global financial
crisis.
F-26
TERNIUM S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Contd.)
4 Accounting policies (continued)
(5) Valuation of the Sidor financial asset
The Sidor financial asset recorded as a result of the nationalization of Sidor was treated as a
receivable and valued at its amortized cost using the applicable effective interest rate. The
discount rate used to measure this receivable at amortized cost was estimated on the basis of
managements best estimate of market rates adjusted to reflect specific risks.
The initial measurement of the receivable and its subsequent measurements until November 8, 2010,
were performed on the basis of its discounted amount using an annual discount rate of 14.36%. This
discount rate was estimated on the basis of the yield (13.3%) of Venezuelan sovereign debt with
maturities similar to that of the receivable held by Ternium against CVG; however, as the
Venezuelan sovereign debt with similar maturities was governed by New York law, while the
receivable with CVG was governed by Venezuelan law, the discount rate was further adjusted to
adequately reflect the specific risk of Terniums receivable. After the rescheduling of the last
unpaid installment agreed on December 18, 2010, the annual discount rate used to measure the
receivable was estimated at 6.28%, on the basis of the specific risks associated to the third-party
promissory notes received as guarantee for full payment of CVG obligations.
For further information on the Sidor nationalization and the rescheduling of the related
receivable, refer to Note 29 (ii).
(6) Useful Lives and Impairment of Property, Plant and Equipment and Other Long-lived Assets
In determining useful lives, management considered, among others, the following factors: age,
operating condition and level of usage and maintenance. Management conducted visual inspections for
the purpose of (i) determining whether the current conditions of such assets are consistent with
normal conditions of assets of similar age; (ii) confirming that the operating conditions and
levels of usage of such assets are adequate and consistent with their design; (iii) establishing
obsolescence levels and (iv) estimating life expectancy, all of which were used in determining
useful lives. Management believes, however, that it is possible that the periods of economic
utilization of property, plant and equipment may be different than the useful lives so determined.
Furthermore, management believes that this accounting policy involves a critical accounting
estimate because it is subject to change from period to period as a result of variations in
economic conditions and business performance.
When assessing whether an impairment indicator may exist, the Company evaluates both internal and
external sources of information, such as the following:
|
|
whether significant changes with an adverse effect on the entity have taken place during the
period, or will take place in the near future, in the technological, market, economic or legal
environment in which the entity operates or in the market to which an asset is dedicated; |
|
|
|
whether market interest rates or other market rates of return on investments have increased
during the period, and those increases are likely to affect the discount rate used in calculating
an assets value in use and decrease the assets recoverable amount materially; |
|
|
|
whether the carrying amount of the net assets of the entity is more than its market
capitalization; |
|
|
|
whether evidence is available of obsolescence or physical damage of an asset. |
|
|
|
whether significant changes with an adverse effect on the entity have taken place during the
period, or are expected to take place in the near future, in the extent to which, or manner in
which, an asset is used or is expected to be used. These changes include the asset becoming
idle, plans to discontinue or restructure the operation to which an asset belongs, plans to dispose
of an asset before the previously expected date, and reassessing the useful life of an asset as
finite rather than indefinite; and |
|
|
|
whether evidence is available from internal reporting that indicates that the economic
performance of an asset is, or will be, worse than expected. |
Management identified the presence of impairment indicators in certain CGUs at December 31, 2008
and, accordingly, carried out impairment tests. These impairment indicators arose mainly due to
recessionary environment and the abrupt decline of demand and prices of steel products.
For the Mexico CGU, management carried out an impairment test for Property, Plant and Equipment and
for other long-lived assets with finite useful lives at December 31, 2008, and concluded that no
impairment was needed. The Company estimated the recoverable amount as the value in use and
compared it to the carrying amount of the corresponding assets (USD 3.2 billion at that date). The
discount rates used were based on the Mexico CGUs weighted average cost of capital (WACC), which
was 13.4%. Variables considered in forecasts included Mexican GDP growth rates and correlation with
steel demand, level of steel prices, and estimated raw material costs as observed in industry
reports.
For the Argentina CGU, management carried out an impairment test for Property, Plant and Equipment
and for other long-lived assets with finite useful lives at December 31, 2008, and also concluded
that no impairments were required. The Company estimated the recoverable amount as the value in
use and compared it to the carrying amount of the corresponding assets (USD 1.3 billion at that
date). The discount rates used were based on the Argentina CGUs WACC, which was 18.3%. Variables
considered in forecasts included Argentinean GDP growth rates and correlation with steel demand,
level of steel prices, and estimated raw material costs as observed in industry reports.
F-27
TERNIUM S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Contd.)
4 Accounting policies (continued)
None of the Companys CGUs were tested for impairment in 2010 and 2009, as no impairment
indicators were identified. Furthermore, based on information currently available, management
believes that the recognition of a future impairment charge is not reasonably possible.
(7) Allowances for doubtful accounts
Management makes estimates of the uncollectibility of our accounts receivable. Management analyses
the trade accounts receivable on a regular basis and, when aware of a third partys inability to
meet its financial commitments to the Company, managements impairs the amount due by means of a
charge to the allowance for doubtful accounts. Management specifically analyses accounts receivable
and historical bad debts, customer creditworthiness, current economic trends and changes in
customer payment terms when evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts.
Allowances for doubtful accounts are adjusted periodically in accordance with the aging of overdue
accounts. For this purpose, trade accounts receivable overdue by more than 90 days, and which are
not covered by a credit collateral, guarantee or similar surety, are fully provisioned. As of
December 31, 2010 and 2009, allowance for doubtful accounts totals USD 17.2 million and USD 16.7
million, respectively.
5 Segment information
Reportable operating segments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Flat steel |
|
|
Long steel |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
products |
|
|
products |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Unallocated |
|
|
Total |
|
Net sales |
|
|
6,376,380 |
|
|
|
833,137 |
|
|
|
172,487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,382,004 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
(4,932,551 |
) |
|
|
(633,958 |
) |
|
|
(98,745 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,665,254 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
1,443,829 |
|
|
|
199,179 |
|
|
|
73,742 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,716,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
(585,746 |
) |
|
|
(62,419 |
) |
|
|
(17,141 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(665,306 |
) |
Other operating income (expenses), net |
|
|
2,887 |
|
|
|
(506 |
) |
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,493 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
860,970 |
|
|
|
136,254 |
|
|
|
56,713 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,053,937 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures PP&E |
|
|
272,623 |
|
|
|
38,123 |
|
|
|
6,172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
316,918 |
|
Depreciation PP&E |
|
|
285,755 |
|
|
|
20,851 |
|
|
|
6,214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
312,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
1,804,896 |
|
|
|
117,721 |
|
|
|
30,773 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,953,390 |
|
Trade receivables, net |
|
|
514,521 |
|
|
|
121,872 |
|
|
|
27,109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
663,502 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
3,831,181 |
|
|
|
378,212 |
|
|
|
53,503 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,262,896 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
1,004,680 |
|
|
|
75,504 |
|
|
|
49,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,129,348 |
|
Assets discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
257,988 |
|
|
|
257,988 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,845,207 |
|
|
|
2,845,207 |
|
F-28
TERNIUM S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Contd.)
5 Segment information (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Flat steel |
|
|
Long steel |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
products |
|
|
products |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Unallocated |
|
|
Total |
|
Net sales |
|
|
4,249,979 |
|
|
|
572,900 |
|
|
|
136,104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,958,983 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
(3,634,854 |
) |
|
|
(392,983 |
) |
|
|
(82,533 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,110,370 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
615,125 |
|
|
|
179,917 |
|
|
|
53,571 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
848,613 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
(477,067 |
) |
|
|
(40,739 |
) |
|
|
(13,724 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(531,530 |
) |
Other operating income (expenses), net |
|
|
(21,303 |
) |
|
|
414 |
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,700 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
116,755 |
|
|
|
139,592 |
|
|
|
40,036 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
296,383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures PP&E |
|
|
178,425 |
|
|
|
10,270 |
|
|
|
1,983 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
190,678 |
|
Depreciation PP&E |
|
|
287,177 |
|
|
|
19,017 |
|
|
|
6,786 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
312,980 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
1,219,347 |
|
|
|
102,423 |
|
|
|
28,798 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,350,568 |
|
Trade receivables, net |
|
|
349,230 |
|
|
|
60,825 |
|
|
|
27,780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
437,835 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
3,724,825 |
|
|
|
263,461 |
|
|
|
52,129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,040,415 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
977,552 |
|
|
|
60,795 |
|
|
|
47,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,085,412 |
|
Assets discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
964,359 |
|
|
|
964,359 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,414,084 |
|
|
|
2,414,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Flat steel |
|
|
Long steel |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
products |
|
|
products |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Unallocated |
|
|
Total |
|
Net sales |
|
|
7,124,687 |
|
|
|
1,075,090 |
|
|
|
265,108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,464,885 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
(5,256,340 |
) |
|
|
(732,332 |
) |
|
|
(139,355 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,128,027 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
1,868,347 |
|
|
|
342,758 |
|
|
|
125,753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,336,858 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
(560,189 |
) |
|
|
(80,303 |
) |
|
|
(28,981 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(669,473 |
) |
Other operating income (expenses), net |
|
|
2,789 |
|
|
|
2,419 |
|
|
|
3,454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,662 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
1,310,947 |
|
|
|
264,874 |
|
|
|
100,226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,676,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures PP&E |
|
|
511,658 |
|
|
|
29,684 |
|
|
|
2,915 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
544,257 |
|
Depreciation PP&E |
|
|
311,624 |
|
|
|
18,422 |
|
|
|
3,715 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
333,761 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
1,708,324 |
|
|
|
100,494 |
|
|
|
17,729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,826,547 |
|
Trade receivables, net |
|
|
449,168 |
|
|
|
133,673 |
|
|
|
40,151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
622,992 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
3,911,919 |
|
|
|
260,925 |
|
|
|
39,469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,212,313 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
1,039,337 |
|
|
|
51,769 |
|
|
|
45,261 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,136,367 |
|
Assets discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,318,900 |
|
|
|
1,318,900 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,554,128 |
|
|
|
1,554,128 |
|
F-29
TERNIUM S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Contd.)
5 Segment information (continued)
Geographical information
There are no revenues from external customers attributable to the Companys country of
incorporation (Luxembourg). Ternium sells its products to three main geographical areas: South and
Central America, North America, and Europe and others. The North American area comprises
principally United States and Mexico. The South and Central American area comprises principally
Argentina, Colombia, Chile, Paraguay, Ecuador, Guatemala, Costa Rica and Brazil.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
South and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Central |
|
|
North |
|
|
Europe and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
America |
|
|
America |
|
|
other |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
|
3,057,676 |
|
|
|
4,208,617 |
|
|
|
115,711 |
|
|
|
7,382,004 |
|
Segment assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade receivables, net |
|
|
192,723 |
|
|
|
456,433 |
|
|
|
14,346 |
|
|
|
633,502 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
1,437,417 |
|
|
|
2,825,370 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
4,262,896 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
54,443 |
|
|
|
1,074,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,129,348 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures PP&E |
|
|
182,845 |
|
|
|
134,027 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
316,918 |
|
Depreciation PP&E |
|
|
118,774 |
|
|
|
194,029 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
312,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
South and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Central |
|
|
North |
|
|
Europe and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
America |
|
|
America |
|
|
other |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
|
1,782,446 |
|
|
|
2,976,938 |
|
|
|
199,599 |
|
|
|
4,958,983 |
|
Segment assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade receivables, net |
|
|
116,231 |
|
|
|
318,466 |
|
|
|
3,138 |
|
|
|
437,835 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
1,297,289 |
|
|
|
2,743,045 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
4,040,415 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
36,188 |
|
|
|
1,049,224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,085,412 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures PP&E |
|
|
117,583 |
|
|
|
73,044 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
190,678 |
|
Depreciation PP&E |
|
|
111,895 |
|
|
|
201,071 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
312,980 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
South and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Central |
|
|
North |
|
|
Europe and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
America |
|
|
America |
|
|
other |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
|
3,107,510 |
|
|
|
5,230,126 |
|
|
|
127,249 |
|
|
|
8,464,885 |
|
Segment assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade receivables, net |
|
|
176,348 |
|
|
|
425,163 |
|
|
|
21,481 |
|
|
|
622,992 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
1,424,382 |
|
|
|
2,787,903 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
4,212,313 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
50,864 |
|
|
|
1,085,503 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,136,367 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures PP&E |
|
|
325,496 |
|
|
|
218,753 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
544,257 |
|
Depreciation PP&E |
|
|
132,891 |
|
|
|
200,843 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
333,761 |
|
F-30
TERNIUM S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Contd.)
6 Cost of sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories at the beginning of the year |
|
|
1,350,568 |
|
|
|
1,826,547 |
|
|
|
1,449,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of business (Note 3) |
|
|
76,771 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translation differences |
|
|
28,621 |
|
|
|
(46,857 |
) |
|
|
(440,685 |
) |
Plus: Charges for the year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raw materials and consumables used and other
movements |
|
|
4,763,000 |
|
|
|
2,473,327 |
|
|
|
5,374,363 |
|
Services and fees |
|
|
197,873 |
|
|
|
126,325 |
|
|
|
154,176 |
|
Labor cost |
|
|
496,961 |
|
|
|
378,558 |
|
|
|
481,057 |
|
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
295,504 |
|
|
|
308,156 |
|
|
|
328,260 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
19,453 |
|
|
|
14,462 |
|
|
|
19,023 |
|
Maintenance expenses |
|
|
342,529 |
|
|
|
221,175 |
|
|
|
277,753 |
|
Office expenses |
|
|
6,662 |
|
|
|
4,997 |
|
|
|
8,347 |
|
Freight and transportation |
|
|
36,892 |
|
|
|
32,846 |
|
|
|
37,735 |
|
Insurance |
|
|
7,530 |
|
|
|
9,256 |
|
|
|
8,695 |
|
Charge (recovery) of obsolescence allowance |
|
|
11,710 |
|
|
|
(7,556 |
) |
|
|
82,125 |
|
Valuation allowance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
127,553 |
|
|
|
199,972 |
|
Recovery from sales of scrap and by-products |
|
|
(40,654 |
) |
|
|
(27,326 |
) |
|
|
(60,379 |
) |
Others |
|
|
25,224 |
|
|
|
19,475 |
|
|
|
34,656 |
|
Less: Inventories at the end of the year |
|
|
(1,953,390 |
) |
|
|
(1,350,568 |
) |
|
|
(1,826,547 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Sales |
|
|
5,665,254 |
|
|
|
4,110,370 |
|
|
|
6,128,027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services and fees |
|
|
60,874 |
|
|
|
46,923 |
|
|
|
65,221 |
|
Labor cost |
|
|
153,807 |
|
|
|
150,914 |
|
|
|
199,304 |
|
Depreciation of property plant and equipment |
|
|
17,316 |
|
|
|
4,824 |
|
|
|
5,501 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
51,027 |
|
|
|
57,663 |
|
|
|
60,757 |
|
Maintenance and expenses |
|
|
11,113 |
|
|
|
6,858 |
|
|
|
7,737 |
|
Taxes |
|
|
89,412 |
|
|
|
65,889 |
|
|
|
79,286 |
|
Office expenses |
|
|
29,567 |
|
|
|
26,134 |
|
|
|
32,682 |
|
Freight and transportation |
|
|
232,184 |
|
|
|
156,520 |
|
|
|
189,848 |
|
(Decrease) Increase of allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
(393 |
) |
|
|
(1,635 |
) |
|
|
2,861 |
|
Others |
|
|
20,399 |
|
|
|
17,440 |
|
|
|
26,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
665,306 |
|
|
|
531,530 |
|
|
|
669,473 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 Labor costs (included in cost of sales, selling, general and administrative expenses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Wages, salaries and social security costs |
|
|
594,909 |
|
|
|
450,828 |
|
|
|
636,018 |
|
Termination benefits |
|
|
27,872 |
|
|
|
55,358 |
|
|
|
22,604 |
|
Pension benefits (Note 24 (i)) |
|
|
27,987 |
|
|
|
23,286 |
|
|
|
21,739 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Labor costs |
|
|
650,768 |
|
|
|
529,472 |
|
|
|
680,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-31
TERNIUM S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Contd.)
9 Other operating income (expenses), net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Results from the sale of sundry assets |
|
|
(4,681 |
) |
|
|
(2,121 |
) |
|
|
5,535 |
|
Provision for legal claims and other matters (Note 21) |
|
|
(5,543 |
) |
|
|
(4,614 |
) |
|
|
(2,358 |
) |
Impairment charge (Note 27 (ii)) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27,022 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Others |
|
|
12,718 |
|
|
|
13,057 |
|
|
|
5,485 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating income (expenses), net |
|
|
2,494 |
|
|
|
(20,700 |
) |
|
|
8,662 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 Other financial income (expenses), net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31 |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Debt issue costs |
|
|
(4,562 |
) |
|
|
(5,149 |
) |
|
|
(11,314 |
) |
Net foreign exchange gain (loss) |
|
|
123,690 |
|
|
|
83,057 |
|
|
|
(632,735 |
) |
Change in fair value of derivative instruments |
|
|
1,545 |
|
|
|
10,607 |
|
|
|
(32,480 |
) |
Others |
|
|
(5,561 |
) |
|
|
(6,876 |
) |
|
|
(16,663 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other financial income (expenses), net |
|
|
115,112 |
|
|
|
81,639 |
|
|
|
(693,192 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 Income tax expense
Income tax
Income tax expense for each of the years presented is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 (1) |
|
Current tax |
|
|
(410,041 |
) |
|
|
(124,647 |
) |
|
|
(502,425 |
) |
Deferred tax (Note 23) |
|
|
(1,035 |
) |
|
|
(24,812 |
) |
|
|
300,614 |
|
Deferred tax effect of changes in tax rates (Note 23) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,216 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Effect of change in fair value of cash flow hedge |
|
|
4,419 |
|
|
|
9,112 |
|
|
|
(23,121 |
) |
Recovery of
income tax (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,249 |
|
|
|
62,228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
(406,657 |
) |
|
|
(91,314 |
) |
|
|
(162,704 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes the reversal of deferred statutory profit sharing. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents gains recorded in 2008 and 2009 for several income tax claims
filed against the tax authorities for which definitive favorable rulings were obtained in each such
year. |
Income tax expense for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 differed from the amount
computed by applying the statutory income tax rate in force in each country in which the company
operates to pre-tax income as a result of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Income before income tax |
|
|
1,186,127 |
|
|
|
430,415 |
|
|
|
880,773 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense at statutory tax rate |
|
|
(366,992 |
) |
|
|
(92,662 |
) |
|
|
(238,822 |
) |
Non taxable income |
|
|
2,797 |
|
|
|
1,940 |
|
|
|
40,785 |
|
Non deductible expenses |
|
|
(38,132 |
) |
|
|
(41,085 |
) |
|
|
(18,883 |
) |
Recovery of income tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,249 |
|
|
|
62,228 |
|
Unrecognized tax losses |
|
|
(4,330 |
) |
|
|
(8,540 |
) |
|
|
(8,012 |
) |
Effect of changes in tax rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,216 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
(406,657 |
) |
|
|
(91,314 |
) |
|
|
(162,704 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax rates used to perform the reconciliation between tax expense (income) and accounting profit are
those in effect at each relevant date or period in each applicable jurisdiction.
F-32
TERNIUM S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Contd.)
12 Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vehicles, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings and |
|
|
Production |
|
|
furniture |
|
|
Work in |
|
|
Spare |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
|
improvements |
|
|
equipment |
|
|
and fixtures |
|
|
progress |
|
|
parts |
|
|
Total |
|
Cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Values at the beginning of the year |
|
|
424,722 |
|
|
|
1,511,825 |
|
|
|
4,024,494 |
|
|
|
149,214 |
|
|
|
387,721 |
|
|
|
32,590 |
|
|
|
6,530,566 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translation differences |
|
|
20,717 |
|
|
|
(18,926 |
) |
|
|
43,439 |
|
|
|
(4,097 |
) |
|
|
(7,566 |
) |
|
|
(1,522 |
) |
|
|
32,045 |
|
Acquisition of business |
|
|
26,041 |
|
|
|
41,217 |
|
|
|
67,280 |
|
|
|
4,070 |
|
|
|
1,510 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140,118 |
|
Additions |
|
|
18,270 |
|
|
|
5,575 |
|
|
|
2,730 |
|
|
|
1,955 |
|
|
|
282,139 |
|
|
|
6,249 |
|
|
|
316,918 |
|
Disposals / Consumptions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,616 |
) |
|
|
(34,111 |
) |
|
|
(2,381 |
) |
|
|
(762 |
) |
|
|
(169 |
) |
|
|
(41,039 |
) |
Transfers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
263,329 |
|
|
|
77,864 |
|
|
|
3,519 |
|
|
|
(344,712 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Values at the end of the year |
|
|
489,750 |
|
|
|
1,799,404 |
|
|
|
4,181,696 |
|
|
|
152,280 |
|
|
|
318,330 |
|
|
|
37,148 |
|
|
|
6,978,608 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated at the beginning of the year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(554,581 |
) |
|
|
(1,809,902 |
) |
|
|
(124,455 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,213 |
) |
|
|
(2,490,151 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translation differences |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,341 |
|
|
|
29,192 |
|
|
|
4,128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
53,715 |
|
Depreciation charge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(78,000 |
) |
|
|
(225,866 |
) |
|
|
(8,464 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(490 |
) |
|
|
(312,820 |
) |
Disposals / Consumptions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,151 |
|
|
|
30,926 |
|
|
|
1,428 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
33,544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated at the end of the year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(611,089 |
) |
|
|
(1,975,650 |
) |
|
|
(127,363 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,610 |
) |
|
|
(2,715,712 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2010 |
|
|
489,750 |
|
|
|
1,188,315 |
|
|
|
2,206,046 |
|
|
|
24,917 |
|
|
|
318,330 |
|
|
|
35,538 |
|
|
|
4,262,896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vehicles, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings and |
|
|
Production |
|
|
furniture |
|
|
Work in |
|
|
Spare |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
|
improvements |
|
|
equipment |
|
|
and fixtures |
|
|
progress |
|
|
parts |
|
|
Total |
|
Cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Values at the beginning of the year |
|
|
412,087 |
|
|
|
1,536,847 |
|
|
|
4,030,337 |
|
|
|
162,173 |
|
|
|
380,050 |
|
|
|
40,192 |
|
|
|
6,561,686 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translation differences |
|
|
11,665 |
|
|
|
(81,486 |
) |
|
|
(101,317 |
) |
|
|
(11,286 |
) |
|
|
(16,901 |
) |
|
|
(4,314 |
) |
|
|
(203,639 |
) |
Additions |
|
|
6,892 |
|
|
|
1,276 |
|
|
|
1,692 |
|
|
|
1,170 |
|
|
|
179,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
190,678 |
|
Disposals / Consumptions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(760 |
) |
|
|
(4,613 |
) |
|
|
(2,483 |
) |
|
|
(3,288 |
) |
|
|
(11,144 |
) |
Transfers |
|
|
(5,922 |
) |
|
|
55,188 |
|
|
|
94,542 |
|
|
|
1,770 |
|
|
|
(152,593 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,015 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Values at the end of the year |
|
|
424,722 |
|
|
|
1,511,825 |
|
|
|
4,024,494 |
|
|
|
149,214 |
|
|
|
387,721 |
|
|
|
32,590 |
|
|
|
6,530,566 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated at the beginning of the year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(532,056 |
) |
|
|
(1,688,314 |
) |
|
|
(126,937 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,066 |
) |
|
|
(2,349,373 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translation differences |
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,341 |
|
|
|
112,784 |
|
|
|
9,743 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,269 |
|
|
|
169,137 |
|
Depreciation charge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(67,866 |
) |
|
|
(234,688 |
) |
|
|
(9,985 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(441 |
) |
|
|
(312,980 |
) |
Disposals / Consumptions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
316 |
|
|
|
2,724 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
3,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated at the end of the year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(554,581 |
) |
|
|
(1,809,902 |
) |
|
|
(124,455 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,213 |
) |
|
|
(2,490,151 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2009 |
|
|
424,722 |
|
|
|
957,244 |
|
|
|
2,214,592 |
|
|
|
24,759 |
|
|
|
387,721 |
|
|
|
31,377 |
|
|
|
4,040,415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-33
TERNIUM S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Contd.)
13 Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
relationships |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
system |
|
|
Mining |
|
|
Exploration |
|
|
contractual |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
projects |
|
|
concessions |
|
|
costs |
|
|
rights |
|
|
Trademarks |
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
Total |
|
Cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Values at the beginning of the year |
|
|
98,736 |
|
|
|
103,909 |
|
|
|
20,812 |
|
|
|
288,414 |
|
|
|
73,358 |
|
|
|
708,643 |
|
|
|
1,293,872 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translation differences |
|
|
(363 |
) |
|
|
5,900 |
|
|
|
1,412 |
|
|
|
14,795 |
|
|
|
3,258 |
|
|
|
39,927 |
|
|
|
64,929 |
|
Acquisition of business |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,467 |
|
|
|
4,407 |
|
|
|
1,557 |
|
|
|
25,473 |
|
Additions |
|
|
20,369 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,843 |
|
|
|
1,994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,206 |
|
Disposals / Consumptions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,379 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,379 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Values at the end of the year |
|
|
118,784 |
|
|
|
109,809 |
|
|
|
31,688 |
|
|
|
324,670 |
|
|
|
81,023 |
|
|
|
750,127 |
|
|
|
1,416,101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated at the beginning of the year |
|
|
(66,363 |
) |
|
|
(35,568 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(74,474 |
) |
|
|
(32,055 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(208,460 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translation differences |
|
|
690 |
|
|
|
(2,215 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,390 |
) |
|
|
(1,898 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,813 |
) |
Amortization charge |
|
|
(17,068 |
) |
|
|
(9,817 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29,847 |
) |
|
|
(13,748 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(70,480 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated at the end of the year |
|
|
(82,741 |
) |
|
|
(47,600 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(108,711 |
) |
|
|
(47,701 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(286,753 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2010 |
|
|
36,043 |
|
|
|
62,209 |
|
|
|
31,688 |
|
|
|
215,959 |
|
|
|
33,322 |
|
|
|
750,127 |
|
|
|
1,129,348 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
relationships |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
system |
|
|
Mining |
|
|
Exploration |
|
|
contractual |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
projects |
|
|
concessions |
|
|
costs |
|
|
rights |
|
|
Trademarks |
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
Total |
|
Cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Values at the beginning of the year |
|
|
97,358 |
|
|
|
96,856 |
|
|
|
15,984 |
|
|
|
304,931 |
|
|
|
71,358 |
|
|
|
683,702 |
|
|
|
1,270,189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translation differences |
|
|
(4,417 |
) |
|
|
3,893 |
|
|
|
885 |
|
|
|
10,505 |
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
24,941 |
|
|
|
37,807 |
|
Additions |
|
|
6,128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,784 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,912 |
|
Disposals / Consumptions |
|
|
(333 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,926 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,259 |
) |
Impairment charge (see note 27 (ii)) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27,022 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27,022 |
) |
Transfers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,160 |
|
|
|
(2,915 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Values at the end of the year |
|
|
98,736 |
|
|
|
103,909 |
|
|
|
20,812 |
|
|
|
288,414 |
|
|
|
73,358 |
|
|
|
708,643 |
|
|
|
1,293,872 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated at the beginning of the year |
|
|
(50,145 |
) |
|
|
(24,429 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(43,015 |
) |
|
|
(16,233 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(133,822 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translation differences |
|
|
2,841 |
|
|
|
(1,358 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,007 |
) |
|
|
(989 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,513 |
) |
Amortization charge |
|
|
(19,059 |
) |
|
|
(9,781 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,452 |
) |
|
|
(14,833 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(72,125 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated at the end of the year |
|
|
(66,363 |
) |
|
|
(35,568 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(74,474 |
) |
|
|
(32,055 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(208,460 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2009 |
|
|
32,373 |
|
|
|
68,341 |
|
|
|
20,812 |
|
|
|
213,940 |
|
|
|
41,303 |
|
|
|
708,643 |
|
|
|
1,085,412 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-34
TERNIUM S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Contd.)
14 Investments in associated companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
At the beginning of the year |
|
|
6,577 |
|
|
|
5,585 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translation adjustment |
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
(118 |
) |
Acquisitions |
|
|
302 |
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends received from associated companies |
|
|
(302 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings of associated companies |
|
|
1,688 |
|
|
|
1,110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At the end of the year |
|
|
8,212 |
|
|
|
6,577 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The principal associated companies, all of which are unlisted, are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voting rights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Country of |
|
at December 31, |
|
|
Value at December 31, |
|
Company |
|
incorporation |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Lomond Holdings BV. (1) |
|
Netherlands |
|
|
50.00 |
% |
|
|
50.00 |
% |
|
|
6,635 |
|
|
|
5,440 |
|
Finma S.A.I.F. (2) |
|
Argentina |
|
|
33.33 |
% |
|
|
33.33 |
% |
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
|
1,058 |
|
Techinst S.A. (2) |
|
Argentina |
|
|
33.33 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
|
|
Arhsa S.A. (2) |
|
Argentina |
|
|
33.33 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
|
|
Compañía Afianzadora
de Empresas
Siderúrgicas S.G.R.
(3) |
|
Argentina |
|
|
38.89 |
% |
|
|
38.89 |
% |
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,212 |
|
|
|
6,577 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Holding Company. Indirectly through the participation in Ternium Treasury Services S.A.
since August 9, 2010. Prior to this date, the participation was held by Ternium Procurement
S.A. |
|
(2) |
|
Consulting and financial services. Indirectly through the participation in Siderar. |
|
(3) |
|
Granting of guarantees to participating partners to facilitate or permit access to
credits for purchase of national raw material. Indirectly through the participation in
Siderar. In process of liquidation. |
15 Other investments, net non-current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Time deposits with related parties (i) (Note 30) |
|
|
18,086 |
|
|
|
16,161 |
|
Investments in debt instruments |
|
|
17,227 |
|
|
|
|
|
Others |
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
253 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other investments, net non-current |
|
|
35,575 |
|
|
|
16,414 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(i) Time deposits with related parties
The Company holds a savings fund denominated in U.S. dollars. Withdrawal of investments before
certain dates is subject to penalties on amounts invested.
F-35
TERNIUM S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Contd.)
16 Receivables, net non-current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Receivables with related parties (Note 30) |
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
372 |
|
Employee advances and loans |
|
|
8,821 |
|
|
|
10,103 |
|
Advances to suppliers for the purchase of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
21,125 |
|
|
|
36,446 |
|
Advances to suppliers for the purchase of property, plant and
equipment with related parties (Note 30) |
|
|
1,548 |
|
|
|
15,168 |
|
Tax credits |
|
|
18,369 |
|
|
|
29,676 |
|
Others |
|
|
6,677 |
|
|
|
9,968 |
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts (Note 21 ) |
|
|
(354 |
) |
|
|
(416 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables, net non-current |
|
|
56,471 |
|
|
|
101,317 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 Receivables current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Value added tax |
|
|
26,169 |
|
|
|
30,777 |
|
Tax credits |
|
|
26,806 |
|
|
|
66,271 |
|
Employee advances and loans |
|
|
10,465 |
|
|
|
8,822 |
|
Advances to suppliers |
|
|
4,815 |
|
|
|
4,059 |
|
Advances to suppliers with related parties (Note 30) |
|
|
552 |
|
|
|
519 |
|
Expenses paid in advance |
|
|
3,695 |
|
|
|
4,676 |
|
Government tax refunds on exports |
|
|
9,263 |
|
|
|
10,603 |
|
Receivables with related parties (Note 30) |
|
|
548 |
|
|
|
892 |
|
Others |
|
|
12,260 |
|
|
|
9,681 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables current |
|
|
94,573 |
|
|
|
136,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 Inventories, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Raw materials, materials and spare parts |
|
|
523,832 |
|
|
|
438,231 |
|
Goods in process |
|
|
998,552 |
|
|
|
678,977 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
415,985 |
|
|
|
213,025 |
|
Goods in transit |
|
|
83,214 |
|
|
|
78,488 |
|
Obsolescence allowance (Note 22) |
|
|
(68,193 |
) |
|
|
(58,153 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
1,953,390 |
|
|
|
1,350,568 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 Trade receivables, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Current accounts |
|
|
669,403 |
|
|
|
441,952 |
|
Trade receivables with related parties (Note 30) |
|
|
10,959 |
|
|
|
12,193 |
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts (Note 22) |
|
|
(16,860 |
) |
|
|
(16,310 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade receivables, net |
|
|
663,502 |
|
|
|
437,835 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 Cash, cash equivalents and other investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
(i) Other investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits with maturity of more than three months |
|
|
848,400 |
|
|
|
46,844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(ii) Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and banks |
|
|
98,811 |
|
|
|
135,917 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
12,343 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits with maturity of less than three months |
|
|
1,668,262 |
|
|
|
1,959,881 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
1,779,416 |
|
|
|
2,095,798 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-36
TERNIUM S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Contd.)
21 Allowances and Provisions non current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deducted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
from assets |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
Allowance for |
|
|
Legal claims |
|
|
|
doubtful |
|
|
and other |
|
|
|
accounts |
|
|
matters |
|
Year ended December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Values at the beginning of the year |
|
|
416 |
|
|
|
18,913 |
|
Translation differences |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(290 |
) |
Additions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,721 |
|
Reversals |
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
(1,178 |
) |
Uses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,022 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2010 |
|
|
354 |
|
|
|
16,144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Values at the beginning of the year |
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
24,400 |
|
Translation differences |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(1,538 |
) |
Additions |
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
7,887 |
|
Reversals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,273 |
) |
Uses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,563 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2009 |
|
|
416 |
|
|
|
18,913 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 Allowances current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deducted from assets |
|
|
|
Allowance for |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
doubtful |
|
|
Obsolescence |
|
|
Valuation |
|
|
|
accounts |
|
|
allowance |
|
|
allowance |
|
Year ended December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Values at the beginning of the year |
|
|
16,310 |
|
|
|
58,153 |
|
|
|
|
|
Translation differences |
|
|
(460 |
) |
|
|
1,911 |
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of business |
|
|
4,168 |
|
|
|
1,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
Reversals |
|
|
(3,885 |
) |
|
|
(17,719 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Additions |
|
|
3,536 |
|
|
|
29,429 |
|
|
|
|
|
Uses |
|
|
(2,809 |
) |
|
|
(4,871 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2010 |
|
|
16,860 |
|
|
|
68,193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Values at the beginning of the year |
|
|
23,350 |
|
|
|
124,883 |
|
|
|
160,935 |
|
Translation differences |
|
|
(561 |
) |
|
|
(216 |
) |
|
|
(2,918 |
) |
Reversals (1) |
|
|
(3,860 |
) |
|
|
(65,465 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Additions |
|
|
1,961 |
|
|
|
57,909 |
|
|
|
127,553 |
|
Uses |
|
|
(4,580 |
) |
|
|
(58,958 |
) |
|
|
(285,570 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2009 |
|
|
16,310 |
|
|
|
58,153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The world financial crisis that took place in part of 2009 and 2008 had a severe
negative impact on the volume of international steel trade, thus reducing the rotation of
the Companys stock. Accordingly, the Company recorded a provision for slow-moving
inventory taking the inventory to net realizable value. As market conditions improved
during fiscal year 2009, certain inventory items covered by the obsolescence allowance
were subsequently sold and their sales prices exceeded those initially estimated when the
obsolescence allowance was recorded, resulting in the reversal of such excess amount at
the time the related inventory was sold. |
F-37
TERNIUM S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Contd.)
23 Deferred income tax
Deferred income taxes are calculated in full on temporary differences under the liability
method using the tax rate of the applicable country.
Changes in deferred income tax are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
At beginning of the year |
|
|
(857,297 |
) |
|
|
(810,160 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translation differences |
|
|
(14,855 |
) |
|
|
11,574 |
|
Deferred income tax expense included within discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,683 |
) |
Effect of changes in tax rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,216 |
) |
Acquisition of business |
|
|
7,832 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax credit (charge) |
|
|
(1,035 |
) |
|
|
(24,812 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At end of the year |
|
|
(865,355 |
) |
|
|
(857,297 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities (prior to offsetting the balances within the
same tax jurisdiction) during the year are as follow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total at |
|
|
|
Fixed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible |
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
assets |
|
|
Inventories |
|
|
assets |
|
|
Other |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At beginning of year |
|
|
(687,120 |
) |
|
|
(55,225 |
) |
|
|
(94,728 |
) |
|
|
(130,022 |
) |
|
|
(967,095 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translation differences |
|
|
(14,378 |
) |
|
|
(3,880 |
) |
|
|
(5,314 |
) |
|
|
6,414 |
|
|
|
(17,158 |
) |
Acquisition of business |
|
|
(17,092 |
) |
|
|
426 |
|
|
|
5,188 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,478 |
) |
Deferred tax credit (charge) |
|
|
36,563 |
|
|
|
(11,819 |
) |
|
|
13,693 |
|
|
|
(45,765 |
) |
|
|
(7,328 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At end of year |
|
|
(682,027 |
) |
|
|
(70,498 |
) |
|
|
(81,161 |
) |
|
|
(169,373 |
) |
|
|
(1,003,059 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade |
|
|
Tax losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
Provisions |
|
|
Receivables |
|
|
(1) |
|
|
Other |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At beginning of year |
|
|
63,193 |
|
|
|
7,835 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,770 |
|
|
|
109,798 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translation differences |
|
|
1,104 |
|
|
|
383 |
|
|
|
(1,012 |
) |
|
|
1,828 |
|
|
|
2,303 |
|
Acquisition of business |
|
|
|
|
|
|
754 |
|
|
|
18,556 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,310 |
|
Income statement credit (charge) |
|
|
2,329 |
|
|
|
(1,001 |
) |
|
|
4,666 |
|
|
|
299 |
|
|
|
6,293 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At end of year |
|
|
66,626 |
|
|
|
7,971 |
|
|
|
22,210 |
|
|
|
40,897 |
|
|
|
137,704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As of December 31, 2010, the recognized tax losses amount to USD 22,210 and the net
unrecognized deferred tax assets amount to USD 22,302. According to the tax law in force in the
jurisdictions in which the tax losses are generated, these amounts do not have a certain expiration
date. |
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset when the entity a) has a legally enforceable right
to set off the recognized amounts; and b) intends to settle the tax on a net basis or to realize
the asset and settle the liability simultaneously.
The amounts shown in the statement of financial position include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Deferred tax assets to be recovered after more than 12 months |
|
|
82,980 |
|
|
|
61,916 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities to be settled after more than 12 months |
|
|
(922,136 |
) |
|
|
(911,289 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(839,156 |
) |
|
|
(849,373 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-38
TERNIUM S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Contd.)
24 Other liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
(i) Other liabilities non-current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination benefits |
|
|
4,877 |
|
|
|
4,114 |
|
Pension benefits |
|
|
166,812 |
|
|
|
151,562 |
|
Related parties (Note 30) |
|
|
507 |
|
|
|
1,058 |
|
Other |
|
|
29,116 |
|
|
|
19,892 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities non-current |
|
|
201,312 |
|
|
|
176,626 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension benefits
The amounts recognized in the consolidated statement of financial position are determined as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Present value of unfunded obligations |
|
|
262,366 |
|
|
|
201,145 |
|
Unrecognized prior service costs |
|
|
(3,694 |
) |
|
|
(4,120 |
) |
Unrecognized actuarial losses |
|
|
(72,946 |
) |
|
|
(45,463 |
) |
Fair value of plan assets |
|
|
(18,914 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability in the statement of financial position |
|
|
166,812 |
|
|
|
151,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amounts recognized in the consolidated income statement are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Current service cost |
|
|
4,697 |
|
|
|
4,594 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
17,351 |
|
Amortization of prior service costs |
|
|
634 |
|
|
|
529 |
|
Net actuarial losses recognized in the year |
|
|
2,656 |
|
|
|
812 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total included in labor costs |
|
|
27,987 |
|
|
|
23,286 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in the liability recognized in the consolidated statement of financial position are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
At the beginning of the year |
|
|
151,562 |
|
|
|
125,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers, new participants and funding of the plan |
|
|
(20,412 |
) |
|
|
(795 |
) |
Total expense |
|
|
27,987 |
|
|
|
23,286 |
|
Translation differences |
|
|
8,473 |
|
|
|
4,711 |
|
Contributions paid |
|
|
(798 |
) |
|
|
(1,340 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At the end of the year |
|
|
166,812 |
|
|
|
151,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The principal actuarial assumptions used were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
Mexico |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Discount rate |
|
|
8.75 |
% |
|
|
9.50 |
% |
Rate of compensation increase |
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
Argentina |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Discount rate |
|
|
7.00 |
% |
|
|
7.00 |
% |
Rate of compensation increase |
|
|
2.00 |
% |
|
|
2.00 |
% |
F-39
TERNIUM S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Contd.)
24 Other liabilities (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
(ii) Other liabilities current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payroll and social security payable |
|
|
88,727 |
|
|
|
40,656 |
|
Termination benefits |
|
|
6,693 |
|
|
|
7,663 |
|
Related Parties (Note 30) |
|
|
22,017 |
|
|
|
4,792 |
|
Others |
|
|
6,173 |
|
|
|
3,910 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities current |
|
|
123,610 |
|
|
|
57,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 Derivative financial instruments
Net fair values of derivative financial instruments
The net fair values of derivative financial instruments at December 31, 2010 and 2009 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Contracts with positive fair values: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
1,588 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
1,588 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contracts with negative fair values: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap contracts |
|
|
(54,675 |
) |
|
|
(78,710 |
) |
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
|
(102 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(54,777 |
) |
|
|
(78,710 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments breakdown is as follows:
a) Interest rate contracts
Fluctuations in market interest rates create a degree of risk by affecting the amount of the
Companys interest payments and the value of its floating-rate debt. As of December 31, 2010, most
of the Companys long-term borrowings were at variable rates.
Ternium Mexico entered into derivative instruments to manage the impact of the floating interest
rate changes on its financial debt. The notional amount represents 50% of its total exposure.
On February 23, 2007, Ternium Mexico entered into four interest rate collar agreements that fix the
interest rate to be paid over an aggregate notional amount of USD 250 million, in an average range
of 4.16% to 6.00%. These agreements are due in September 2011 and March 2012.
On June 18, 2008, Ternium Mexico entered into 4 knock-in swap agreements in an average swap level
of 5.22% and a knock-in level of 2.5%. As of December 31, 2010, the notional amount outstanding is
USD 645 million. These agreements are due in July 2012 and have been accounted for as cash flow
hedges. Changes in fair value of derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges for each of
the years presented are included below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow hedges |
|
|
|
Gross amount |
|
|
Income Tax |
|
|
Total |
|
At December 31, 2008 |
|
|
(82,574 |
) |
|
|
23,121 |
|
|
|
(59,453 |
) |
(Decrease) / Increase |
|
|
(19,348 |
) |
|
|
5,417 |
|
|
|
(13,931 |
) |
Reclassification to income statement |
|
|
55,229 |
|
|
|
(14,529 |
) |
|
|
40,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2009 |
|
|
(46,693 |
) |
|
|
14,009 |
|
|
|
(32,684 |
) |
(Decrease) / Increase |
|
|
(19,334 |
) |
|
|
5,800 |
|
|
|
(13,534 |
) |
Reclassification to income statement |
|
|
34,063 |
|
|
|
(10,219 |
) |
|
|
23,844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2010 |
|
|
(31,964 |
) |
|
|
9,590 |
|
|
|
(22,374 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The gross amount of the pre-tax reserve recorded in other comprehensive income at December 31, 2010
(amounting to a loss of USD 32.0 million) is expected to be reclassified to the income statements
as follows: USD 19.4 million in 2011, and USD 12.6 million in 2012.
F-40
TERNIUM S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Contd.)
25 Derivative financial instruments (continued)
On August 13, 2010, Ternium Treasury Services entered into an interest rate swap agreement that
floats the interest rate to be paid over an aggregate notional amount of USD 10.1 million, to the
equivalent of Fed Funds rate plus 38 bps. This agreement expires in April 2012.
b) Foreign exchange contracts
From time to time, Terniums subsidiaries enter into derivative agreements to manage their exposure
to currencies other than the USD.
During 2010, Siderar and its subsidiary Prosid Investments have entered into several forward
agreements to manage the exchange rate exposure generated by Siderars sales in EUR. The notional
amount hedged as of December 31, 2010 was EUR 3.3 million with an average forward price of 1.39 USD
per EUR.
Beginning in August 2010, Ternium Treasury Services entered into a cross currency swap agreement
over an aggregate notional amount of EUR 5.0 million, at an exchange rate of 1.32 USD per EUR, to
manage its exposure to investments in Euros. This agreement is due in November 18, 2011.
Furthermore, during 2010, Ternium International Costa Rica and Ternium Guatemala, subsidiaries of
Ternium Mexico, have been hedging their exposure denominated in their local currencies through
non-deliverable forward agreements. As of December 31, 2010, the agreements aggregate notional
amount were CRC 4.1 billion at an exchange rate of 514 CRC per USD and GTQ 49 million at an
exchange rate of 8.12 GTQ per USD.
The net fair values of the exchange rate derivative contracts as of December 31, 2010 and December
31, 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value at December 31, |
|
Currencies |
|
Contract |
|
Notional amount |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
USD/EUR |
|
Forward |
|
3,300 EUR |
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
177 |
|
USD/EUR |
|
Cross Currency Swap |
|
5,000 EUR |
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
|
|
CRC/USD |
|
ND Forward |
|
4,113,280 CRC |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
GTQ/USD |
|
ND Forward |
|
48,711 GTQ |
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
|
|
MXN/USD |
|
Forward |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
773 |
|
ARS/USD |
|
ND Forward |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
1,588 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
None of the foreign exchange contracts described above were accounted for as cash flow hedges.
USD: US dollars; ARS: Argentine pesos; BRL: Brazilian reales; MXN: Mexican pesos; COP: Colombian
pesos; GTQ: Guatemalan quetzales; CRC: Costa Rican colon.
26 Borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
(i) Non-current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank borrowings |
|
|
1,429,278 |
|
|
|
1,794,149 |
|
Less: debt issue costs |
|
|
(2,704 |
) |
|
|
(6,945 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,426,574 |
|
|
|
1,787,204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(ii) Current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank borrowings |
|
|
517,718 |
|
|
|
543,940 |
|
Less: debt issue costs |
|
|
(4,635 |
) |
|
|
(4,415 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
513,083 |
|
|
|
539,525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Borrowings |
|
|
1,939,657 |
|
|
|
2,326,729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-41
TERNIUM S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Contd.)
26 Borrowings (continued)
The maturity of borrowings is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected Maturity Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013 and |
|
|
At December 31, (1) |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
thereafter |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Rate |
|
|
14,206 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,206 |
|
|
|
15,595 |
|
Floating Rate |
|
|
498,877 |
|
|
|
1,289,445 |
|
|
|
137,129 |
|
|
|
1,925,451 |
|
|
|
2,311,134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
513,083 |
|
|
|
1,289,445 |
|
|
|
137,129 |
|
|
|
1,939,657 |
|
|
|
2,326,729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As most borrowings incorporate floating rates that approximate market rates and the
contractual repricing occurs every 3 to 6 months, the fair value of the borrowings
approximates their carrying amount and it is not disclosed separately. |
The weighted average interest rates which incorporate instruments denominated mainly in US
dollars and which also include the effect of derivative financial instruments- at year end were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Bank borrowings |
|
|
3.29 |
% |
|
|
3.04 |
% |
The nominal average interest rates shown above were calculated using the rates set for each
instrument in its corresponding currency and weighted using the dollar-equivalent outstanding
principal amount of said instruments at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Breakdown of borrowings by currency is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
Currency |
|
Interest rates |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
USD |
|
Floating |
|
|
1,786,928 |
|
|
|
2,311,134 |
|
USD |
|
Fixed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,971 |
|
ARS |
|
Fixed |
|
|
312 |
|
|
|
11,624 |
|
BRL |
|
Floating |
|
|
12,725 |
|
|
|
|
|
GTQ |
|
Fixed |
|
|
10,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
COP |
|
Floating |
|
|
125,798 |
|
|
|
|
|
COP |
|
Fixed |
|
|
3,746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Borrowings |
|
|
|
|
1,939,657 |
|
|
|
2,326,729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USD: US dollars; ARS: Argentine pesos; BRL: Brazilian reales; MXN: Mexican pesos; COP: Colombian
pesos; GTQ: Guatemalan quetzales
F-42
TERNIUM S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Contd.)
27 Contingencies, commitments and restrictions on the distribution of profits
Ternium is involved in litigation arising from time to time in the ordinary course of business.
The Company recorded a provision for those cases in which there is a probable cash outflow and the
outcome can be reliably estimated. Based on managements assessment and the advice of legal
counsel, it is not anticipated that the ultimate resolution of existing litigation would be
material to Terniums consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
(i) Tax claims
(a) Siderar. AFIP Income tax claim for fiscal years 1995 to 1999
The Administración Federal de Ingresos Públicos (AFIP the Argentine tax authority) has
challenged the charge to income of certain disbursements that Siderar has treated as expenses
necessary to maintain industrial installations, which as such should be deducted in the year in
which they take place. The AFIP asserts that these are investments or improvements that must be
capitalized and, therefore, it made a jeopardy assessment of income tax due on a nominal tax basis
plus fines and interest in fiscal years 1995 to 1999 amounting to approximately USD 19.2 million as
of December 31, 2010.
The Company appealed these assessments before the National Tax Court, as in the view of its legal
and tax advisors, there are reasons that would likely result in a favorable ruling for the Company.
On April 13, 2005 the Company was notified of a ruling issued by the National Tax Court reducing
the assessments made by the AFIP for fiscal years 1995 and 1996. The ruling was appealed both by
the Company and the AFIP.
On June 10, 2010 the Company was notified of a ruling issued by the Court of Appeals in federal
administrative law which mainly resulted in favor of the Company. The ruling was appealed both by
the Company and the AFIP.
Based on the above, the Company recognized a provision amounting to USD 2.1 million as of December
31, 2010 as management considers there could be a potential cash outflow.
(ii) Commitments
The following are Terniums main off-balance sheet commitments:
(a) Siderar entered into a contract with Tenaris, a related company of Ternium, for the supply of
steam generated at the power generation facility that Tenaris owns in the compound of the Ramallo
facility of Siderar. Under this contract, Tenaris has to provide 250 tn/hour of steam, and Siderar
has the obligation to take or pay this volume. The amount of this outsourcing agreement totals USD
107.3 million and is due to terminate in 2018.
(b) Siderar, within the investment plan to increase its production capacity, has entered into
several commitments to acquire new production equipment for a total consideration of USD 121.5
million.
(c) Siderar is a party to a long-term contract with Air Liquide Argentina S.A. for the operation
and maintenance of a separation facility at San Nicolás for a contracted amount of USD 177.2
million as of December 31, 2010, which is due to terminate in 2025.
Under the terms of the contract, Siderar is required to take or pay certain minimum daily amounts
of oxygen, nitrogen and argon, which amounts are consistent with its production requirements in
Argentina. As a result of the severe global crisis that began in 2008 and the uncertainties
surrounding the evolution of steel demand in the domestic and global markets, the parties engaged
in discussions for the renegotiation of the contract. In February 2011, Siderar and Air Liquide
Argentina reached agreement on the terms of the renegotiation. As a result of such negotiations,
the payment and supply obligations of the parties under the long-term contract were suspended
through March 31, 2012, and Siderar agreed to purchase from Air Liquide Argentine certain equipment
for an aggregate amount of approximately US$22.3 million. If Siderar were to resume its expansion
plan on or prior to March 31, 2012, Air Liquide would be required to repurchase that equipment at
the same price, and the payments and supply obligations under the contract would be reinstated;
otherwise, the contract and all rights and obligations thereunder would terminate automatically on
March 31, 2012, and Siderar would be required to pay to Air Liquide Argentina an aggregate amount
currently estimated at US$12 million.
(d) Siderar assumed fixed commitments for the purchase of raw materials for a total amount of USD
643.3 million, which include purchases of certain raw materials at prices that are USD 21.6 million
higher than market prices at the end of the period. The Company records the actual cost incurred
for the purchase of such raw materials and does not recognize any anticipated losses, as sales
prices of finished goods are expected to exceed production cost.
(e) The production process of Ternium Mexicos (former Hylsas plants) requires a large amount of
electricity. On December 20, 2000, Hylsa entered into a 25-year contract with Iberdrola Energia
Monterrey, S.A. de C.V. (Iberdrola), a Mexican subsidiary of the Spanish Company Iberdrola
Energía, S.A., for the supply to four of Mexicos plants of a contracted electrical demand of 111.2
MW, for a contracted amount of USD 1.1 billion, which is due to terminate in 2027. There are no
penalties if consumption is lower in 30 MW per year. This contract effectively started on April 30,
2002, and currently supplies approximately 27% of Ternium Mexicos electricity needs.
F-43
TERNIUM S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Contd.)
27 Contingencies, commitments and restrictions on the distribution of profits (continued)
(f) Ternium Mexico is a party to several long-term operating lease agreements for the rental of
machinery, materials handling equipment and computers. There are no due amounts for year 2011.
Total loss for lease payments recorded in the year ended December 31, 2010 accounts for USD 0.7
million.
(g) Several Ternium Mexicos subsidiaries which have facilities throughout the Mexican territory
are parties to a long term energy purchase agreement for approximately 90 MW of electricity as
purchased capacity with Tractebel Energía de Monterrey, S. de R.L. de C.V., distributed among each
plant defined as a capacity user. Each capacity user is committed to pay Tractebel for the
purchased capacity and for the net energy delivered. Ternium Mexico is required to provide its best
estimate of its expected nomination for capacity and energy under the specific limits and
timelines. The monthly payments are calculated considering the capacity charges, energy charges,
back-up power charges, and transmission charges, less any steam credits. The contracted amount is
of USD 257 million and the contract will terminate in 2018.
(h) Grupo Imsa (now Ternium Mexico), together with Grupo Marcegaglia, Duferco International and
Donkuk Steel were parties to a ten-year steel slab off-take framework agreement with Corus UK
Limited (now Tata Steel UK Limited) dated as of December 16, 2004, which was supplemented by
bilateral off-take agreements. Under the agreements, the off-takers could be required, in the
aggregate, to purchase approximately 78% of the steel slab production of Corus Teeside facility in
the North East of England, and Grupo Imsas share was 15.38%, or approximately 0.5 million tons per
year, of the total production.
In addition, the offtakers were required to make, in the aggregate and according to their
respective pro rata shares, significant payments to Corus to finance capital expenditures. In
December 2007, all of Grupo Imsas rights and obligations under this contract were assigned to
Ternium Procurement S.A. (formerly known as Alvory S.A.).
On April 7, 2009, Ternium Procurement S.A., together with the other off-takers, declared the early
termination of the off-take framework agreement and their respective off-take agreements with Corus
pursuant to a provision allowing the off-takers to terminate the agreements upon the occurrence of
certain events specified in the off-take framework agreement. Corus initially denied the occurrence
of the alleged termination event, stated that it would pursue specific performance and initiated an
arbitration proceeding against the off-takers and Ternium Mexico (as guarantor of Ternium
Procurements obligation) seeking damages arising out of the alleged wrongful termination of the
off-take agreements, which damages Corus did not quantify but stated would exceed the USD 150
million (approximately USD 29.7 million in the case of Ternium Procurement), the maximum aggregate
cap on liability that the off-takers understand would have under the off-take framework agreement
(a limitation that Corus disputed). In addition, Corus threatened to submit to arbitration further
claims in tort against the off-takers, and also threatened to submit such claims against certain
third parties to such agreements, including the Company. The off-takers and Ternium Mexico, in
turn, denied Corus claims and brought counterclaims against Corus which, in the aggregate, would
also be greater than USD 150 million.
On May 12, 2009, Corus, by a letter from its lawyers, alleged that the off-takers termination
notice amounted to a repudiatory breach of the agreements and stated that it accepted that the
agreements had come to an end and that it would no longer pursue a claim for specific performance
in the arbitration; the claim for damages, for all losses caused by the alleged off-takers
wrongful repudiation of the agreements, however, would be maintained. On July 9, 2009, Corus
submitted an amended request for arbitration adding tortious claims against the off-takers and
adding to its claims the payment of punitive or exemplary damages.
On December 21, 2010, the arbitration tribunal issued a partial final award where it held that the
off-takers had invalidly terminated the off-take agreements. The tribunal also held that the
maximum aggregate USD 150 million liability cap (out of which approximately USD 29.7 million
corresponds to Ternium Procurement) provided in the off-take framework agreement applied to all of
Coruss claims against the off-takers, including tort as well as contract claims. At the date
hereof, all other issues in this arbitration proceeding, including damages and costs awards and
off-takers counterclaims, are pending determination. As of the date hereof, Ternium believes that
Ternium Procurements liability in connection with this matter (which in no event may exceed the
amount of the cap) cannot be reasonably estimated.
At the time of obtaining control over Grupo Imsa in 2007, the Company valued the intangible asset
related to this contract at USD 29.7 million. As of March 31, 2009, the Company recorded an
impairment of the remaining value of this intangible asset for a total amount of USD 27.0 million,
as the value of such intangible asset was not representative of market conditions at that time.
F-44
TERNIUM S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Contd.)
27 Contingencies, commitments and restrictions on the distribution of profits (continued)
(iii) Restrictions on the distribution of profits
Under Luxembourg law, at least 5% of net income per year calculated in accordance with Luxembourg
law and regulations must be allocated to a reserve until such reserve has reached an amount equal
to 10% of the share capital. At December 31, 2010, this reserve reached the above-mentioned
threshold.
As of December 31, 2010, Ternium may pay dividends up to USD 6.3 billion in accordance with
Luxembourg law and regulations.
Shareholders equity under Luxembourg law and regulations comprises the following captions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December |
|
|
|
31, 2010 |
|
Share capital |
|
|
2,004,743 |
|
Legal reserve |
|
|
200,474 |
|
Distributable reserves |
|
|
101,437 |
|
Non distributable reserves |
|
|
1,414,122 |
|
Accumulated profit at January 1, 2010 (1) |
|
|
1,535,379 |
|
Profit for the year |
|
|
4,666,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity under Luxembourg GAAP |
|
|
9,922,710 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As a result of the repurchase of its own shares from Usiminas on February 15, 2011 (see note
36 Subsequent events), the Company is required under applicable Luxembourg law to create a
new non-distributable reserve in the amount of USD 150 million. |
28 Earnings per share
As of December 31, 2010, the capital was USD 2,004,743,442 represented by 2,004,743,442
shares, each having a nominal value of USD 1.00 each.
For fiscal years 2010, 2009 and 2008, the weighted average of shares outstanding totaled
2,004,743,442 shares.
Earnings per share are calculated by dividing the net income attributable to equity holders of the
Company by the daily weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Profit from continuing operations attributable to
equity holders of the Company |
|
|
622,076 |
|
|
|
305,830 |
|
|
|
544,987 |
|
Profit from discontinued operations attributable
to equity holders of the Company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
411,570 |
|
|
|
170,431 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue |
|
|
2,004,743,442 |
|
|
|
2,004,743,442 |
|
|
|
2,004,743,442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted earnings per share from
continuing operations attributable to equity
holders of the Company (USD per share) |
|
|
0.31 |
|
|
|
0.15 |
|
|
|
0.27 |
|
Basic and diluted earnings per share from
discontinued operations attributable to equity
holders of the Company (USD per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.21 |
|
|
|
0.09 |
|
29 Discontinued operations
(i) Sale of non strategic U.S. assets
On February 1, 2008, Ternium, through its subsidiary Imsa Acero S.A. de C.V., completed the
sale of its interests in Steelscape Inc., ASC Profiles Inc., Varco Pruden Buildings Inc. and
Metl-Span LLC to BlueScope Steel North America Corporation, a subsidiary of BlueScope Steel
Limited, for a total consideration of USD 722.7 million on a cash-free and debt-free basis, net of
working capital and other adjustments. Direct transaction costs paid by the Company in connection
with this sale totaled USD 4.1 million. The Company continues to own Steelscapes Shreveport, LA
plant. Ternium has also retained its pre-engineered metal buildings and insulated steel panels
businesses in Mexico. The result of this transaction was a gain of USD 97.5 million, calculated as
the net proceeds of the sale less the book value of discontinued net assets and the corresponding
tax effect.
F-45
TERNIUM S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Contd.)
29 Discontinued operations (continued)
(ii) Nationalization of Sidor
On March 31, 2008, Ternium S.A. (the Company) controlled approximately 59.7% of Sidor, while
Corporación Venezolana de Guayana, or CVG (a Venezuelan governmental entity), and Banco de
Desarrollo Económico y Social de Venezuela, or BANDES (a bank owned by the Venezuelan government),
held approximately 20.4% of Sidor and certain Sidor employees and former employees held the
remaining 19.9% interest.
Further to several threats of nationalization and various adverse interferences with management in
preceding years, on April 8, 2008, the Venezuelan government announced its intention to take
control over Sidor. On April 29, 2008, the National Assembly of Venezuela passed a resolution
declaring that the shares of Sidor, together with all of its assets, were of public and social
interest, and authorizing the Venezuelan government to take any action it deemed appropriate in
connection with any such assets, including expropriation. Subsequently, Decree Law 6058 of the
President of Venezuela dated April 30, 2008, ordered that Sidor and its subsidiaries and associated
companies be transformed into state-owned enterprises (empresas del Estado), with the government
owning not less than 60% of their share capital. On July 12, 2008, Venezuela, acting through CVG,
assumed operational control and complete responsibility for Sidors operations, and Sidors board
of directors ceased to function. However, negotiations between the Venezuelan government and the
Company regarding the terms of the compensation continued over several months, and the Company
retained formal title over the Sidor shares during that period.
On May 7, 2009, the Company completed the transfer of its entire 59.7% interest in Sidor to CVG.
The Company agreed to receive an aggregate amount of USD 1.97 billion as compensation for its Sidor
shares. Of that amount, CVG paid USD 400 million in cash at closing. The balance was divided in two
tranches: the first tranche of USD 945 million was scheduled to be paid in six equal quarterly
installments beginning in August 2009 until November 2010, while the second tranche would be due in
November 2010, subject to quarterly mandatory prepayment events based on the increase of the WTI
crude oil price over its May 6, 2009 level. Under the agreements with CVG and Venezuela, in the
event of non-compliance by CVG with its payment obligations, the Company reserved the rights and
remedies that it had prior to the transfer of the Sidor shares in relation to any claim against
Venezuela, subject to certain limitations, including that the Company may not claim an amount
exceeding the outstanding balance due from CVG.
CVG made all payments required to be made under the agreements governing the transfer of Sidor to
Venezuela except for the final payment due on November 8, 2010. On December 18, 2010, Ternium
reached an agreement with CVG, on the rescheduling of the unpaid balance, which amounted to USD
257.4 million. As provided in the refinancing agreement, CVG paid USD 7.0 million to Ternium in
January 2011, and CVG is required to pay the remainder in five quarterly installments, beginning on
February 15, 2011 and ending on February 15, 2012. The first installment of USD 31.2 million was
paid on February 16, 2011. As security for the payment of the outstanding balance, Ternium
received, duly endorsed in its favor, promissory notes issued by Energía Argentina S.A. (Enarsa)
and Compañía Administradora del Mercado Mayorista Eléctrico S.A. (Cammesa) (both companies owned
by the Argentine government) to PDVSA Petróleo S.A. (a company owned by the Venezuelan government).
In addition, Ternium continues to reserve all of its rights under contracts, investment treaties
and Venezuelan and international law in the event of non-payment of the amounts still owing to it.
The payments so rescheduled bear interest at 6.28% annual rate and, accordingly, the carrying
amount of the receivable does not differ significantly from the net present value, at market rates,
of the expected cash flows there under.
At December 31, 2010, the carrying amount of the Sidor financial asset (following the receipt of
USD 1,721.0 million cash payments up to December 31, 2010) amounted to USD 258.0 million (of which
USD 183.4 million were current and USD 74.5 million were non-current).
At December 31, 2009, the carrying amount of the Sidor financial asset (following the receipt of
USD 953.6 million cash payments up to December 31, 2009) amounted to USD 964.4 million after
application of a 14.36% annual discount rate to adequately reflect, and only for the purpose of
recording, the present accounting value of the receivable with CVG. The Company estimated, at May
7, 2009, the 14.36% annual discount rate on the basis of the yield (13.3%) of Venezuelan sovereign
debt with maturities similar to that of the receivable held by Ternium against CVG. However, as the
Venezuelan sovereign debt with similar maturities was governed by New York law while the receivable
with CVG was governed by Venezuelan law, the discount rate was further adjusted to adequately
reflect the specific risk of Terniums receivable.
At December 31, 2009, the Company recorded a net gain, for accounting purposes, of USD 428.0
million in connection with this transaction which was disclosed within Income from discontinued
operations in the Income Statement. This result represents the difference between (i) the fair
value, for accounting purposes, net of taxes and other transaction costs, of the compensation for
the Sidor financial asset (which comprised a USD 400 million cash payment and a receivable against
CVG that, at May 7, 2009, had a fair value of USD 1,382.0 million after application of the discount
rate stated above, net of taxes and other transaction costs of USD 35.1 million) and (ii) the
carrying amount of the Sidor financial asset at March 31, 2009.
In the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company recorded gains in the amount of USD 61.0
million and USD 136.0 million, respectively, included in Interest income Sidor financial asset
in the Income Statement, representing the accretion income over the receivable held against CVG.
F-46
TERNIUM S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Contd.)
29 Discontinued operations (continued)
(iii) Analysis of the result of discontinued operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
467,618 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(306,744 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160,874 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(90,362 |
) |
Other operating income (expenses), net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial expenses, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,330 |
) |
Loss from Participation Account Sidor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(96,525 |
) |
Income from Participation Account |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
210,205 |
|
Equity in (losses) earnings of associated companies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(150 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
169,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,326 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
211,118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain form the sale of non strategic U.S. assets see Note 29 (i) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97,481 |
|
Reversal of currency translation adjustment Sidor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(151,504 |
) |
Gain from the disposal of Sidor (net of income tax) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
428,023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
428,023 |
|
|
|
157,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes the results of Sidor for the period January 1, 2008 up to March 31, 2008. |
(iv) Analysis of cash flows from discontinued operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from discontinued operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income of from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
428,023 |
|
|
|
157,095 |
|
Adjustments for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,820 |
|
Income tax accruals less payments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41,613 |
) |
Gain from the sale of non strategic U.S. assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(97,481 |
) |
Reversal of currency translation adjustment Sidor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
151,504 |
|
Gain from the disposal of Sidor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(428,023 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Changes in working capital and others |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107,184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from discontinued operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
327,509 |
|
Net cash used in discontinued investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(54,923 |
) |
Net cash used in discontinued financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,216 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
242,370 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes cash flow movements from Sidor for the period January 1, 2008 up to March
31, 2008. |
F-47
TERNIUM S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Contd.)
30 Related party transactions
At December 31, 2010, Techint Holdings S.à.r.l. (formerly known as III Industrial Investments
Inc.), a Cayman Islands company (Techint) owned 60.64% of the Companys share capital and Tenaris
held 11.46%, of the Companys share capital. As of December 31, 2010, each of Techint and Tenaris
were controlled by San Faustin N.V., a Netherland Antilles company (San Faustin); Rocca &
Partners S.A. (R&P) controlled a significant portion of the voting power of San Faustin and had
the ability to influence matters affecting, or submitted to a vote of the shareholders of San
Faustin, such as the election of directors, the approval of certain corporate transactions and
other matters concerning its policies; and there were no controlling shareholders for R&P.
Prior to the date of issuance of these financial statements, the Company was informed by Techint
that there had been a reorganization in the chain of ownership of the Company pursuant to which the
Companys direct and indirect controlling shareholders had been redomiciled to Europe. The Company
was further informed that this reorganization does not involve any change in the control of the
Company. Based on the information received:
|
|
|
Techint transferred its domicile from the Cayman Islands to Luxembourg; |
|
|
|
San Faustin also transferred its domicile from Curacao to Luxembourg and changed its name
to San Faustin S.A. and |
|
|
|
In connection with the redomiciliation of San Faustin into Luxembourg, R&P organized a
Dutch private foundation (Stichting) under the name of Rocca & Partners Stichting
Administratiekantoor Aandelen San Faustin (RP STAK). As of the date hereof, RP STAK holds
shares in San Faustin sufficient in number to control San Faustin. No person or group of
persons controls RP STAK. |
For commitments with Related Parties see Note 27.
The following transactions were carried out with related parties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
(i) Transactions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Sales of goods and services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of goods to other related parties |
|
|
172,337 |
|
|
|
40,915 |
|
|
|
109,036 |
|
Sales of services to associated parties |
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
Sales of services to other related parties |
|
|
1,763 |
|
|
|
562 |
|
|
|
1,101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
174,615 |
|
|
|
41,553 |
|
|
|
110,180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) Purchases of goods and services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of goods from other related parties |
|
|
49,735 |
|
|
|
34,834 |
|
|
|
61,127 |
|
Purchases of services from associated parties |
|
|
38,939 |
|
|
|
31,403 |
|
|
|
32,796 |
|
Purchases of services from other related parties |
|
|
114,377 |
|
|
|
91,404 |
|
|
|
172,708 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
203,051 |
|
|
|
157,641 |
|
|
|
266,631 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) Financial results |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income with associated parties |
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
581 |
|
|
|
906 |
|
Income with other related parties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses with other related parties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
670 |
|
|
|
906 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d) Dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends received from associated parties |
|
|
302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
(ii) Year-end balances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a) Arising from sales/purchases of goods/services
and other transactions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables from associated parties |
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
329 |
|
Receivables from other related parties |
|
|
11,424 |
|
|
|
13,128 |
|
Advances to suppliers with other related parties |
|
|
2,101 |
|
|
|
15,687 |
|
Payables to associated parties |
|
|
(1,953 |
) |
|
|
(1,775 |
) |
Payables to other related parties |
|
|
(42,048 |
) |
|
|
(16,541 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,108 |
) |
|
|
10,828 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) Other investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time deposit |
|
|
18,086 |
|
|
|
16,161 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,086 |
|
|
|
16,161 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-48
TERNIUM S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Contd.)
30 Related party transactions (continued)
(iii) Officers and Directors compensation
During the year ended December 31, 2010 the cash compensation of Officers and Directors amounted to
USD 11,144.
In addition, Officers received 763 thousand Units for a total amount of USD 2,238 in connection
with the incentive retention program mentioned in note 4 (n) (3).
31 Joint Venture in Mexico
On October 4, 2010, Ternium and Nippon Steel Corporation signed a definitive agreement to form
a joint venture in Mexico for the manufacturing and sale of hot-dip galvanized and galvannealed
steel sheets to serve the Mexican automobile market. The joint venture company was established in
November 2010 and operates under the name of Tenigal, S.R.L. de C.V. Ternium and Nippon Steel hold
51% and 49% participations in Tenigal, respectively.
Tenigal plans to build a hot-dip galvanizing plant in the vicinity of Monterrey City (equivalent to
the state-of-the-art equipment now in operation at Nippon Steels steelworks in Japan) with a
production capacity of 400,000 metric tons per year. Ternium expects that construction of the
facility would require a total investment of approximately USD 350 million. The plant is currently
expected to commence production of high-grade and high-quality galvanized and galvannealed
automotive steel sheets, including outer-panel and high-strength qualities, in 2013. Tenigal is
expected to serve the requirements of the growing automotive industry in Mexico, including those of
the Japanese car makers.
In addition, Ternium Mexico plans to construct new pickling, cold-rolling, annealing and tempering
lines at the same site. Part of the output from these lines will be used to supply the Tenigal
plant. Ternium expects that construction of these lines would require a total investments of
approximately USD 700 million.
32 Other required disclosures
(a) Statement of comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow hedges |
|
|
Currency |
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
translation |
|
|
|
amount |
|
|
Income Tax |
|
|
Total |
|
|
adjustment |
|
At December 31, 2008 |
|
|
(82,574 |
) |
|
|
23,121 |
|
|
|
(59,453 |
) |
|
|
(621,450 |
) |
Increase / (Decrease) |
|
|
(19,348 |
) |
|
|
5,417 |
|
|
|
(13,931 |
) |
|
|
(93,922 |
) |
Reclassification to income statement |
|
|
55,229 |
|
|
|
(14,529 |
) |
|
|
40,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2009 |
|
|
(46,693 |
) |
|
|
14,009 |
|
|
|
(32,684 |
) |
|
|
(715,372 |
) |
Increase / (Decrease) |
|
|
(19,334 |
) |
|
|
5,800 |
|
|
|
(13,534 |
) |
|
|
35,915 |
|
Reclassification to income statement |
|
|
34,063 |
|
|
|
(10,219 |
) |
|
|
23,844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2010 |
|
|
(31,964 |
) |
|
|
9,590 |
|
|
|
(22,374 |
) |
|
|
(679,457 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) Statement of cash flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
(i) Changes in working capital (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories |
|
|
(497,430 |
) |
|
|
429,122 |
|
|
|
(821,713 |
) |
Receivables and others |
|
|
30,052 |
|
|
|
115,252 |
|
|
|
(35,031 |
) |
Trade receivables |
|
|
(179,308 |
) |
|
|
193,677 |
|
|
|
(22,535 |
) |
Other liabilities |
|
|
63,062 |
|
|
|
(67,778 |
) |
|
|
20,412 |
|
Trade payables |
|
|
135,651 |
|
|
|
(35,094 |
) |
|
|
(212,605 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(447,973 |
) |
|
|
635,179 |
|
|
|
(1,071,472 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(ii) Income tax accrual less payments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax accrued (Note 11) |
|
|
406,657 |
|
|
|
91,314 |
|
|
|
162,704 |
|
Taxes paid |
|
|
(179,837 |
) |
|
|
(140,656 |
) |
|
|
(251,215 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
226,820 |
|
|
|
(49,342 |
) |
|
|
(88,511 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(iii) Interest accruals less payments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest accrued |
|
|
70,771 |
|
|
|
105,655 |
|
|
|
138,979 |
|
Interest paid |
|
|
(70,830 |
) |
|
|
(94,949 |
) |
|
|
(223,130 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
10,706 |
|
|
|
(84,151 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Changes in working capital are shown net of the effect of exchange rate changes. |
F-49
TERNIUM S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Contd.)
33 Recently issued accounting pronouncements
(i) Improvements to International Financial Reporting Standards
In May 2010, the IASB issued Improvements to International Financial Reporting Standards by which
it amended several international accounting and financial reporting standards.
The effective date of each amendment is included in the IFRS affected.
The Companys management estimates that the application of these improvements will not have a
material effect on the Companys financial condition or results of operations.
(ii) Amendments to IFRS 7, Financial Instruments: Disclosures
In October 2010, the IASB amended International Financial Reporting Standard 7 Financial
Instruments- Disclosures. The amendment requires disclosures to help users of financial statements
evaluate the risk exposures relating to transfers of financial assets that are not derecognised and
the effect of those risks on an entitys financial position.
Entities shall apply these amendments for annual periods beginning on or after 1 July 2011. Earlier
application is permitted.
The Companys management estimates that the application of this amendment will not have a material
effect on the Companys financial condition or results of operations.
34 Financial risk management
1) Financial risk factors
Terniums activities expose the Company to a variety of risks: market risk (including the effects
of changes in foreign currency exchange rates, interest rates and commodities prices), credit risk
and liquidity risk.
Terniums overall risk management program focuses on the unpredictability of financial markets and
seeks to minimize potential adverse effects on the financial performance. Terniums subsidiaries
may use derivative financial instruments to hedge certain risk exposures.
1.1) Market Risk
(i) Foreign exchange rate risk
Ternium operates and sells its products in different countries, and as a result is exposed to
foreign exchange rate volatility. In addition, the Company entered into several borrowings that
contain covenants providing for the compliance with certain financial ratios, including ratios
measured in currencies other that the U.S. dollar. This situation exposes Ternium to a risk of
non-compliance derived from volatility in foreign exchange rates. Terniums subsidiaries may use
derivative contracts in order to hedge their exposure to exchange rate risk derived from their
trade and financial operations.
Ternium general policy is to minimize the negative impact of fluctuations in the value of other
currencies with respect to the U.S. dollar. Terniums subsidiaries monitor their net operating cash
flows in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, and analyze potential hedging according to market
conditions. These hedging can be carried out by netting operational positions or by financial
derivatives. However, regulatory or legal restrictions in the countries in which Terniums
subsidiaries operate, could limit the possibility of the Company carrying out its hedging policy.
Ternium has foreign operations, whose net assets are exposed to foreign currency translation risk,
some of which may impact net income. The fact that some subsidiaries have measurement currencies
other than the U.S. dollar may, at times, distort the results of the hedging efforts as reported
under IFRS.
The following table shows a breakdown of Terniums assessed financial position exposure to currency
risk as of December 31, 2010. These balances include intercompany positions where the intervening
parties have different functional currencies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USD million |
|
Functional Currency |
|
Exposure to |
|
USD |
|
|
MXN |
|
|
ARS |
|
|
COP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US dollar (USD) |
|
|
(n/a |
) |
|
|
(1,922.2 |
) |
|
|
200.1 |
|
|
|
(48.1 |
) |
EU euro (EUR) |
|
|
(13.9 |
) |
|
|
(3.8 |
) |
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other currencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-50
TERNIUM S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Contd.)
34 Financial risk management (continued)
We estimate that if the Argentine peso, Mexican peso and Colombian peso had weakened by 1%
against the US dollar with all other variables held constant, total pre-tax income for the year
would have been USD 17.2 million lower (USD 19.6 million lower as of December 31, 2009), as a
result of foreign exchange gains/losses on translation of US dollar-denominated financial position,
mainly trade receivables, borrowings and trade payables. This effect would have been offset by the
change in the currency translation adjustment recorded in equity.
Considering the same variation of the currencies against the US dollar of all net investments in
foreign operations amounting to USD 3.9 billion, the currency translation adjustment included in
total equity would have been USD 38.8 million lower (USD 32.5 million lower as of December 31,
2009), arising from the adjustment on translation of the equity related to the Mexican peso, the
Argentine peso and the Colombian peso.
(ii) Interest rate risk
Ternium manages its exposure to interest rate volatility through its financing alternatives and
hedging instruments. Borrowings issued at variable rates expose the Company to the risk of
increased interest expense in the event of a raise in market interest rates, while borrowings
issued at fixed rates expose the Company to a variation in its fair value. The Companys
interest-rate risk mainly arises from long-term borrowings that bear variable-rate interest that is
partially fixed through different derivative transactions, such as swaps and structures with
options. The Companys general policy is to maintain a balance between instruments exposed to fixed
and variable rates; which can be modified according to long term market conditions.
Terniums nominal weighted average interest rate for its debt instruments which also includes the
effect of derivative financial instruments- was 3.29% and 3.04% for 2010 and 2009, respectively.
These rates were calculated using the rates set for each instrument in its corresponding currency
and weighted using the dollar-equivalent outstanding principal amount of each instrument as of
December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Terniums total variable interest rate debt amounted to USD 1,925 million (99.3% of total
borrowings) at December 31, 2010 and USD 2,311 million (99.4% of total borrowings) at December 31,
2009.
If interest rates on the aggregate average notional of US dollar denominated borrowings held during
2010, excluding borrowings with derivatives contracts mentioned in Note 25(a), had been 100 basis
points higher with all other variables held constant, total pre-tax income for the year ended
December 31, 2010 would have been USD 10.3 million lower (USD 7.6 million lower as of December 31,
2009).
(iii) Commodity price risk
In the ordinary course of its operations, Ternium purchases raw materials (such as iron ore, coal
and slabs) and other commodities (including electricity and gas). Commodity prices are generally
volatile as a result of several factors, including those affecting supply and demand, political,
social and economic conditions, and other circumstances. Ternium monitors its exposure to commodity
price volatility on a regular basis and applies customary commodity price risk management
strategies. For further information on long-term commitments, see note 27(ii).
1.2) Credit risk
Credit risk arises from cash and cash equivalents, deposits with banks and financial institutions,
as well as credit exposures to customers, including outstanding receivables and committed
transactions. Terniums subsidiaries have credit guidelines in place to ensure that derivative and
treasury counterparties are limited to high credit quality financial institutions.
Ternium has no significant concentrations of credit risk from customers. No single customer
accounts for more than five percent of Terniums sales. Terniums subsidiaries have
policies in place to ensure that sales are made to customers with an appropriate credit history,
and that credit insurances, letters of credit or other instruments are requested to reduce credit
risk whenever deemed necessary. The subsidiaries maintain allowances for potential credit losses.
The utilization of credit limits is regularly monitored.
Trade and other receivables are carried at face value less allowance for doubtful accounts, if
applicable. This amount does not differ significantly from fair value. The other receivables do not
contain significant impaired assets.
As of December 31, 2010, trade receivables total USD 663.5 million. These trade receivables are
collateralized by guarantees under letter of credit and other bank guarantees of USD 15.3 million,
credit insurance of USD 375.5 million and other guarantees of USD 18.9 million.
As of December 31, 2010, trade receivables of USD 594.6 million were fully performing.
As of December 31, 2010, trade receivables of USD 55.7 million were past due. These trade
receivables as of December 31, 2010, are past due less than 3 months.
F-51
TERNIUM S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Contd.)
34 Financial risk management (continued)
The amount of the allowance for doubtful accounts was USD 17.2 million as of December 31, 2010.
The carrying amounts of the Companys trade and other receivables as of December 31, 2010, are
denominated in the following currencies:
|
|
|
|
|
Currency |
|
USD million |
|
US dollar (USD) |
|
|
387.9 |
|
EU euro (EUR) |
|
|
14.1 |
|
Argentine peso (ARS) |
|
|
34.2 |
|
Mexican peso (MXN) |
|
|
307.1 |
|
Colombian peso (COP) |
|
|
71.0 |
|
Other currencies |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
814.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
1.3) Liquidity risk
Management maintains sufficient cash and marketable securities and credit facilities to finance
normal operations.
Management monitors rolling forecasts of the groups liquidity reserve on the basis of expected
cash flow.
The Company has not negotiated additional credit facilities.
The table below analyses financial liabilities into relevant maturity groups based on the remaining
period at the date of the statement of financial position to the contractual maturity date. The
amounts disclosed in the table are the contractual undiscounted cash flows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USD million |
|
2011 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
2014 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings |
|
|
513.0 |
|
|
|
1,289.4 |
|
|
|
12.7 |
|
|
|
24.9 |
|
|
|
99.5 |
|
Interests to be accrued (1) |
|
|
26.6 |
|
|
|
17.6 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
Trade payables and other liabilities |
|
|
569.9 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives financial instruments |
|
|
35.9 |
|
|
|
19.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1,145.4 |
|
|
|
1,326.5 |
|
|
|
22.2 |
|
|
|
32.4 |
|
|
|
109.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
These amounts do not include the effect of derivative financial instruments. |
As of December 31, 2010 total cash and cash equivalents and other current investments less
borrowings amounted to USD 688.2 million.
1.4) Capital risk
Ternium seeks to maintain an adequate debt/equity ratio considering the industry and the markets
where it operates. The year-end ratio debt over debt plus equity is 0.22 and 0.27 as of December
31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The Company does not have to comply with regulatory capital
adequacy requirements as known in the financial services industry.
2) Financial instruments by category and fair value hierarchy level
The accounting policies for financial instruments have been applied to the line items below.
According to the scope and definitions set out in IFRS 7 and IAS 32, employers rights and
obligations under employee benefit plans, and non financial assets and liabilities such as advanced
payments and income tax payables, are not included.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets at fair |
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2010 |
|
Loans and |
|
|
value through |
|
|
|
|
(in USD thousands) |
|
receivables |
|
|
profit and loss |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(i) Assets as per statement of
financial position |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables |
|
|
38,693 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,693 |
|
Derivative financial instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
212 |
|
Trade receivables |
|
|
663,502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
663,502 |
|
Other investments |
|
|
23,864 |
|
|
|
859,849 |
|
|
|
883,713 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
113,342 |
|
|
|
1,666,073 |
|
|
|
1,779,416 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
839,401 |
|
|
|
2,526,134 |
|
|
|
3,365,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-52
TERNIUM S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Contd.)
34 Financial risk management (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
financial |
|
|
|
|
(in USD thousands) |
|
Derivatives |
|
|
liabilities |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(ii) Liabilities as per
statement of financial position |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,682 |
|
|
|
28,682 |
|
Trade payables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
541,709 |
|
|
|
541,709 |
|
Derivative financial instruments |
|
|
54,777 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,777 |
|
Borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,939,657 |
|
|
|
1,939,657 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
54,777 |
|
|
|
2,510,048 |
|
|
|
2,564,825 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade payables, borrowings and other liabilities are carried at amortized cost. These amounts do
not differ significantly from fair value.
Fair Value by Hierarchy
Following the requirements contained in paragraph 27B of IFRS 7, Ternium categorizes each class of
financial instrument measured at fair value in the statement of financial position into three
levels, depending on the significance of the judgment associated with the inputs used in making the
fair value measurements. Level 1 comprises financial assets and financial liabilities whose fair
values have been determined on the basis of quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for
identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 includes financial assets and financial liabilities for
which fair values have been estimated using inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1
that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly (i.e. as prices) or indirectly
(i.e. derived from prices). Level 3 comprises financial instruments for which inputs to estimate
fair value of the assets or liabilities are not based on observable market data (unobservable
inputs).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value measurement at December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
(in USD thousand): |
|
Description |
|
Total |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial assets at fair value
through profit or loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
1,666,073 |
|
|
|
1,531,082 |
|
|
|
134,991 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other investments |
|
|
859,849 |
|
|
|
811,824 |
|
|
|
48,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives financial instruments |
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
2,526,134 |
|
|
|
2,342,906 |
|
|
|
183,228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities at fair
value through profit or loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives financial instruments |
|
|
54,777 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,777 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
54,777 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,777 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were no significant transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
3) Accounting for derivative financial instruments and hedging activities
Derivative financial instruments are initially recognized in the statement of financial position at
cost and subsequently measured at fair value. Changes in fair value are disclosed under Other
financial income (expenses), net line item in the income statement. Ternium does not hedge its net
investments in foreign entities.
Ternium designates certain derivatives as hedges of a particular risk associated with a recognized
asset or liability or a highly probable forecast transaction. These transactions are classified as
cash flow hedges (mainly interest rate swaps, collars and commodities contracts). The effective
portion of the fair value of derivatives that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges is
recognized within other comprehensive income. Amounts accumulated in other comprehensive income are
recognized in the income statement in the same period than any offsetting losses and gains on the
hedged item. The gain or loss relating to the ineffective portion is recognized immediately in the
income statement. The fair value of Ternium derivative financial instruments (asset or liability)
continues to be reflected on the statement of financial position.
F-53
TERNIUM S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Contd.)
34 Financial risk management (continued)
For transactions designated and qualifying for hedge accounting, Ternium documents at inception the
relationship between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as its risk management
objectives and strategy for undertaking various hedge transactions. The Company also documents its
assessment, both at hedge inception and on an ongoing basis, of whether the derivatives that are
used in
hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in fair values or cash flows of
hedged items. At December 31, 2010, the effective portion of designated cash flow hedges amounts to
USD 22.4 million (net of taxes for USD 9.6 million) and is included as Cash flow hedges line item
in the statement of comprehensive income.
The fair values of various derivative instruments used for hedging purposes are disclosed in Note
25. The full fair value of a hedging derivative is classified as a non-current asset or liability
when the remaining maturity of the hedged item is more than 12 months and as a current asset or
liability when the remaining maturity of the hedged item is less than 12 months.
Changes in the fair value of any derivative instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting
under IAS 39 are recognized immediately in the income statement.
4) Fair value estimation
The estimated fair value of a financial instrument is the amount at which the instrument could be
exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced or liquidation
sale.
For the purpose of estimating the fair value of financial assets and liabilities with maturities of
less than one year, the Company uses the market value less any estimated credit adjustments. For
other investments, including the trust fund, the Company uses quoted market prices.
As most borrowings include variable rates or fixed rates that approximate market rates and the
contractual re-pricing occurs every 3 to 6 months, the fair value of the borrowings approximates
its carrying amount and is not disclosed separately.
In assessing the fair value of derivatives and other financial instruments, Ternium uses a variety
of methods, including, but not limited to, estimated discounted value of future cash flows using
assumptions based on market conditions existing at each year end.
35 Auditors fees
Total fees accrued for professional services rendered by PricewaterhouseCoopers to Ternium S.A.
and its subsidiaries during the year ended December 31, 2010 amounted to USD 3,144, including USD
2,457 for audit services, USD 449 for audit-related services, USD 232 for tax services and USD 6
for all other services.
36 Subsequent events Repurchase of Shares from Usiminas concurrently with secondary public
offering
On January 31, 2011, Ternium entered into a transaction and registration rights agreement with
its 14.3% shareholder Usinas Siderúrgicas de Minas Gerais S.A. Usiminas (Usiminas) and
Techint. The transaction and registration rights agreement provided, among other things, for a
SEC-registered underwritten public offering of up to all of Ternium shares held by Usiminas (less
the number of shares that Ternium and Techint agreed to purchase as discussed below) in the form of
ADSs listed on the New York Stock Exchange. Neither Ternium nor Techint offered to sell any Ternium
shares or ADSs in the public offering.
On February 9, 2011, Ternium and Techint, following the pricing of the underwritten public offering
mentioned above, entered into purchase agreements with Usiminas relating to their concurrent
purchase transactions of Ternium shares. Under these agreements, on February 15, 2011, Ternium and
Techint purchased from Usiminas 41,666,666 and 27,777,780 Ternium shares for a total consideration
of USD 150 million and USD 100 million, respectively. In connection with its repurchase of shares
from Usiminas, Ternium collected a USD 10.2 million fee and was reimbursed of all expenses relating
to the offering and concurrent purchase.
Following consummation of these transactions, Techint owns directly 62.02% of the Companys share
capital and Tenaris holds 11.46% of the Companys share capital and Usiminas will no longer own any
Ternium shares. Also, upon completion of the transaction, the two members of Terniums board of directors
nominated by Usiminas resigned from the Ternium board.
37 Update as of June 30, 20111
(a) Debt refinancing in Ternium Mexico
On April 6, 2011, Ternium Mexico, Crédit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank, acting as
Administrative Agent, and certain banks parties to a loan agreement dated as of July 12, 2007,
partially refinanced a syndicated loan facility that had been incurred to finance Terniums 2007
acquisition of Grupo Imsa. The outstanding balance of the facility so refinanced amounted to USD1.0
billion. As part of the refinancing, the final maturity date of bank loans in a principal amount of
USD0.8 billion was extended to July 23, 2014 (with the
extended loans being payable in four consecutive and equal semi-annual installments commencing on
January 26, 2013), and the applicable margin structure for the extended loans was amended. On July
26, 2012, Ternium Mexico will repay the remaining USD0.2 billion principal amount of the loans that
were not so refinanced.
|
|
|
1 |
|
This note was added subsequent to the
approval of these financial statements at the Annual General Meeting of
shareholders of the Company held on June 1, 2011. |
F-54
TERNIUM S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Contd.)
(b) Recent developments involving Siderar
As of March 31, 2011 25.97% of Siderars equity is held by the Administración Nacional de la
Seguridad Social (ANSeS), Argentinas governmental social security agency. ANSeS became a
significant shareholder of Siderar in the last quarter of 2008 as a result of the nationalization
of Argentinas private pension system. Investments held by the private pension funds were subject
to certain restrictions, including a cap preventing them to exercise more than 5% of any companys
voting rights (regardless of their share participation in any such company), and the act of
Congress ordering the transfer of assets from the private pension funds to ANSeS provided that all
limitations applicable to the pension funds would continue to apply to ANSeS. However, on April 13,
2011, the Argentine Executive Branch issued Decree 441/2011, which purports to abrogate the 5% cap
on voting rights. If ANSeS were to exercise its voting rights in excess of the 5% cap, ANSeS may
appoint up to three out of eleven members of Siderars board of directors and one out of three
members of Siderars surveillance committee, thereby allowing the government to have an active role
in the governance of Siderar and ultimately influence its business policies. Ternium believes that
Decree 441/2011 is unconstitutional based on, among other reasons, the absence of the urgency
grounds that must be met for an act of Congress to be amended by a decree of the Executive Branch.
On April 15, 2011, Siderars annual general shareholders meeting resolved, among other things, to
approve a dividend payment of ARS1.5 billion (USD370 million) to be made available to shareholders
(including Ternium) beginning on May 6, 2011. At that meeting, Ternium objected to the exercise by
ANSeS of voting rights in excess of the 5% cap; however, ANSeS was allowed to record its vote as
though the 5% restriction did not apply. Although the ANSeS representative voted against the
dividend payment and most of other resolutions proposed by Siderars board of directors, ANSeS did
not prevail in any vote, even computing its votes without giving effect to the voting cap.
Following the dividend approval, the annual shareholders meeting was suspended until May 11, 2011.
After the meeting, the Comisión Nacional de Valores (CNV), Argentinas securities regulator,
declared Siderars shareholders meeting (including the resolution approving the USD370 million
dividend) void for administrative purposes. Siderar challenged in court the CNV resolution
voiding Siderars shareholders meeting and Ternium took legal action against Decree 441/2011.
These legal actions are currently pending.
On May 2, 2011, Siderar received notice of a preliminary injunction issued at ANSeSs request by a
commercial court in the City of Buenos Aires, suspending the execution of certain resolutions taken
by Siderars shareholders meeting (including the allocation of results for fiscal year 2010), and
ordering Siderar to refrain from disposing, in whole or in part, of certain reserves and retained
earnings accounts recorded in its net equity, except for the purpose of paying dividends. On May 5,
2011, the commercial court clarified that Siderar was prevented from distributing dividends out of
its results or reserves for the fiscal year 2010 and was solely allowed to make distributions out
of results or reserves corresponding to fiscal years prior to 2010. Siderar subsequently informed
the market that, as a result of this court decision, it was not permitted to make on May 11, 2011,
the dividend payment approved by its April 15, 2011 shareholders meeting, and filed an appeal
against the court decisions in accordance with applicable law. The appeal is currently pending.
On May 6, 2011, the CNV issued a resolution requesting Siderar to convene a new shareholders
meeting. But on May 11, 2011, at Terniums request, the Commercial Court of Appeals of the City of
Buenos Aires authorized Siderar to maintain its annual shareholders meeting suspended for 60 days.
While Siderar filed an appeal against this CNV resolution (which is currently pending), Siderars
board of directors convened a new general shareholders meeting to be held on July 21, 2011.
On May 27, 2011, a federal prosecutor requested a federal criminal court in the City of Buenos
Aires to investigate whether the members of Siderars board of directors should be subject to
criminal penalties as a result of Siderars failure to provide additional information on the
allocation of Siderars ARS6.5 billion (or USD1.5 billion) special reserve for future dividends or
to distribute a higher amount of dividends out of the special reserve. The special reserve, which
increased significantly since 2003, had not previously been objected to or challenged by
Siderars shareholders or any regulatory authority. Ternium believes that the prosecutors
allegations are unsupported.
In addition, on June 2, 2011, the CNV instituted administrative proceedings against the members of
Siderars board of directors and supervisory committee. These proceedings are intended to determine
if these persons breached their legal duties by preventing ANSeS from exercising its voting rights
in excess of the 5% cap at the April 15, 2011 shareholders meeting. These proceedings are
currently ongoing.
(c) Settlement of arbitration proceedings
The disclosure below updates Note 27 (h).
On April 15, 2011, the arbitration tribunal issued a second partial final award where it held that
the off-takers should pay to the claimant GBP 1.6 million for its reasonable legal and other costs
incurred before the first partial final award. The off-takers paid that amount around mid May. In
addition, on May 27, 2011, the off-takers paid to Tata an aggregate amount of USD16.3 million (of
which Ternium
Procurement paid USD 3.2 million) as indemnification for one of its claims under the arbitration
proceedings.
F-55
TERNIUM S.A.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Contd.)
On June 16, 2011, Tata, the off-takers and Ternium Mexico settled the dispute, and the off-takers,
in exchange for a full release and discharge of each of them and their respective representatives
and affiliates, from all claims and disputes that Tata may have against any of them in relation to
the off-take framework agreement and its related agreements, agreed to pay to Tata an aggregate
amount of USD124 million (including the USD16.3 million previously paid) and authorized their agent
under the off-take agreements to transfer to Tata UK£1.8 million and 0.5 million which had been
received by the agent from the off-takers under the off-take framework agreement before the early
termination of such agreement. Ternium Procurement paid to Tata its share of the settlement amount
(i.e., USD21.3 million) on June 17, 2011. On June 21, 2011, Tata notified the arbitration tribunal
that the arbitration proceedings were withdrawn.
(d) Annual General Meeting and Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders
On June 1, 2011, the annual general meeting of shareholders of the Company approved all resolutions
on its agenda. Among other resolutions adopted at the meeting, the shareholders approved the
consolidated financial statements and annual accounts for the year ended December 31, 2010, as well
as the payment of an annual dividend of USD0.075 per share (USD0.75 per ADS), or an aggregate
amount of approximately USD150.4 million. The Company paid such dividend on June 9, 2011.
The shareholders meeting also re-elected Ubaldo Aguirre, Roberto Bonatti, Carlos Condorelli, Pedro
Pablo Kuczynski, Adrian Lajous, Bruno Marchettini, Gianfelice Mario Rocca, Paolo Rocca and Daniel
Agustín Novegil as members of the board of directors to serve until the next annual shareholders
meeting that will be convened to decide on the 2011 accounts, and appointed PricewaterhouseCoopers
S.àr.l., Réviseur dentreprises agréé, as our independent auditors for the year ending December 31,
2011.
The board of directors subsequently re-appointed Paolo Rocca as its chairman and Daniel Novegil as
Terniums chief executive officer, and confirmed Ubaldo Aguirre, Pedro Pablo Kuczynski and Adrián
Lajous as members of the boards audit committee, with Mr. Aguirre to continue chairing that
committee. All three members of the audit committee qualify as independent directors under our
articles of association.
On June 1, 2011, the extraordinary general meeting of shareholders also approved, among other
amendments to the articles of association, amendment to Article 15 of the articles of association
regarding the date of the annual general meetings of shareholders so that in the future they are
held on the first Wednesday of May of each year. Additionally, such meeting also approved the
amendment of Article 2 of the articles of association in order to adapt it to the abolishment of
Luxembourg law of July 31, 1929.
Pablo
Brizzio
Pablo Brizzio
Chief Financial Officer
F-56